The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2022/03/28 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, March 28, 2022 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Natalie Meeks • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Dave Vadodaria • Commissioners: Lucille Kring, LuisAndres Perez, Steve White, Phillip Wolfgramm, David Heywood • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Roll Call • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, March 24, 2022, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 03/28/2022 Page 2 of 6 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 03/28/2022 Page 3 of 6 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 Location: 2429 East Ball Road Request: Approval of a conditional use permit and a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with an existing 2,274 square convenience store. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Thomas Gorham tgorham@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 (DEV2021-00023) Location: 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard, and 523 West Victor Request: A conditional use permit and tentative tract map to permit a multiple-family attached development (townhomes) consisting of 31-residential dwelling units with modified development standards. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Class 32 (Infill Development) categorical exemption is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net 03/28/2022 Page 4 of 6 ITEM NO. 4 VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 (DEV2021-00094) Location: 100 South Manchester Avenue Request: The applicant requests to construct an 18,000 square foot administration and bus maintenance facility for the Anaheim Transportation Network with building and landscaping setbacks that are less than required by Code; and to permit fewer parking spaces than required by Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (In-fill Development Projects). . Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Thomas Gorham tgorham@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, April 11, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. 03/28/2022 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4 p.m. March 24, 2022 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: _ ____________________________ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 8:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 8:00 de la mañana un día hábil antes de la reunión programada. 03/28/2022 Page 6 of 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 28, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 LOCATION: 2429 East Ball Road APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Eli Jaloul, and the property owner is Sunana Properties. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with a new convenience store. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution (Attachment No. 1), determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approve Development Permit No. 2021-00224 subject to the recommended conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: The proposed use would occupy an existing 2,274 square foot freestanding one-story building located on a 10,500 square foot property. The building is currently vacant and has previously been used as a convenience store. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and the General Plan designates this property for Residential-Medium land uses. The property is surrounded to the north, south, and west by Multiple-Family Residential uses and to the east by an automotive-service station and convenience store (no alcohol sales). DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 7 View of subject property looking north from Ball Road PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the sale of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and spirits) for off-premises (off-sale) consumption in conjunction with an existing 2,274 square foot free- standing convenience store. The State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) requires a Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License, which are issued for grocery stores, markets, liquor stores, and convenience stores. The applicant has operated the His Nibs Liquor and Deli at 2501 E. Ball Road (northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street) for the past 30 years. The existing liquor store is located within a multi-tenant shopping center which will be demolished in order to develop a new gas station, convenience store, and car wash that was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2021. The applicant intends to move his existing liquor store to the subject location, which is 300 feet west of his existing location. Site Improvements: The applicant proposes to make various improvements to the property and building including the following: • Restripe the parking lot to comply with City parking standards • Provide a new trash enclosure • Provide new landscaping at the street frontage • Remove existing nonconforming pole sign • Remove the pay phone • Provide a new storefront entry and storefront glass • Paint the building • Install new signage • Provide a new loading area • Provide new accessible path of travel from sidewalk to store entry • Improve interior including shelving, coolers, stock room, and ADA compliant restroom DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 3 of 7 SITE PLAN Operations: The hours of operation would be as follows: • 7:00 am to 11:00 pm Monday - Thursday • 7:00 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday • 8:00 am to 10:00 pm Sundays In addition to alcohol sales, the store would offer everyday items such as snacks, soft drinks and a limited grocery selection. The business would have two full time employees and one part time employee, with one employee on the morning shift and two employees for the night shift. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 4 of 7 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises (off-sale) consumption requires approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Section 18.08.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. In addition, a determination of public convenience or necessity is required for this application because this property is located within a census tract with a crime rate above the citywide average. Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 5 of 7 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption requires the approval of a conditional use permit in the “C-G” General Commercial zone to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, and to ensure that the use would not be detrimental to the general health and safety of the community. Through the conditional use permit process, conditions of approval may be imposed to ensure that the subject use would operate in a manner that does not create nuisances, affect the general health and welfare of the community, and not adversely affect surrounding properties. Typical nuisances that may be associated with alcohol sales include loitering, public drunkenness, graffiti, noise, and trash. • Operations: In order to ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages does not create nuisances, affect the general health and welfare of the community, and not adversely affect surrounding properties, the following operational conditions are included in the draft resolution: o The owner/operator shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the storefront and the parking area and shall install and maintain a trash receptacle in front of the storefront. o The owner/operator shall install and use interior and exterior video surveillance to promote shopper and business safety and the appearance of safety. Video surveillance signs shall be posted notifying the shopper. o The exterior of the building and parking lot shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness. o The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall be consistent with the floor plan approved as part of the subject conditional use permit. o The business shall operate only between the hours of 7:00 am to 11:00 pm Monday – Thursday; 7:00 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday; and 8:00 am to 10:00 pm Sundays o There shall be no display of alcoholic beverages located outside of the store or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the store. o The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the premises. o Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. o The owner/operator shall police the area under their control to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. o There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. o Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS (Responsible Beverage Service), or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 6 of 7 o The owner/operator shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two-inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Traffic: Access to the site is provided by an existing driveway off of Ball Road. No modifications to the driveway would be required. The traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area. It is not expected that the proposed use would increase traffic from the previous convenience store use. Parking: The required parking for the proposed use is four spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area. Based on this requirement the proposed use would require nine parking spaces, and nine parking spaces are provided. Effect on adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area: The proposed project does not involve any new construction or expansion of the existing building. The proposed hours of operation are typical for similar types of uses. The existing parking lot will be re-striped and reconfigured to meet current code standards and the proposed use will meet the parking requirements. As such, with implementation of the recommended conditions of approval, staff believes the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety. Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN): State law limits the issuance of new alcohol sales licenses when a license is requested in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. A determination of public convenience or necessity is required for this application because this property is located within a reporting district with a crime rate above the City average. State law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed business would serve "public convenience or necessity." The subject site is in Census Tract Number 863.06 which has a population of 3,975. This population allows for two off-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses. and there is presently one license in the tract. It also allows for five on-sale licenses, and there are presently no licenses in the tract. This subject site is within Reporting District 1828 which is 73% above the city average in crime. Incident reports within a ¼-mile radius from 2429 E. Ball Rd. in the past year primarily consisted of: 36 thefts, 24 motor vehicle thefts, 21 simple assaults, and 19 vandalisms. The approval of a CUP for the sale of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and spirits) for off-premises (off-sale) consumption for the proposed convenience store would be a convenience to the public by providing a location to purchase alcohol that is easily and safely reachable by foot and by patrons in vehicles coming from the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the proposed location would replace the applicant’s existing location approximately 300 feet to the east, thereby allowing the applicant to maintain his existing customer base. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 March 28, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Based on staff’s review and the conditions of approval proposed for this permit, staff supports the request for determination of public convenience or necessity. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). The Class 1 exemption consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of the use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a request to allow the sales of alcoholic beverages for off- premises consumption in conjunction with an existing commercial building. The proposal does not include any physical changes to the building or the property that would result in a significant impact on the environment. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Subject to the recommended conditions of approval, staff believes that the proposed sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with the existing convenience store for off- premises consumption would be compatible with surrounding uses and the general vicinity, would not be detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety of the community, and would provide a public convenience or necessity. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Draft Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution (Attachment No. 1) and approve this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Contract Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 2. Applicant Letter of Request 3. Project Plans 4. Police Department Memo 3.17.22 5. Vicinity Map 6. Aerial Map [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00224) (2429 East Ball Road) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) a conditional use permit and (ii) a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (Type 21 Off-Sale General ABC License) in conjunction with a new liquor store (referred to herein as the "Proposed Project"), at a certain real property located at 2429 East Ball Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 10,500 square feet in area and is developed with an approximately 2,274 square foot one-story commercial building. The Property is designated for Residential- Medium land uses by the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the "C-G" Commercial General Zone and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“AMC”); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 28, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the AMC, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Development Permit No. 2021-00224 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in conjunction with a liquor store is an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone under Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. 2. The Proposed Project would be located within a 2,274 square foot single-tenant one-story commercial building on a 10,500 square foot property. The sale of alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, and spirits) for off-premises (off-sale) consumption in conjunction with a convenience store will require a Type 21 Off-Sale General License from the State of California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) which are issued for grocery stores, markets, liquor stores, and convenience stores. The applicant has operated the His Nibs Liquor and Deli at 2501 E. Ball Road (northeast corner of Ball Road and Sunkist Street) for the past 30 years. The applicant intends to move his existing liquor store to the subject location, which is 300 feet west of his existing location. In addition to liquor sales, the store would offer everyday items such as snacks, soft drinks and a limited grocery selection. The business would have two full time employees and one part time employee, with one employee on the morning shift and two employees for the night shift. The liquor store’s hours of operation would be 7:00 am to 11:00 pm Monday through Thursday; 7:00 am to 12:00 am Friday and Saturday; and 8:00 am to 10:00 pm Sundays. The Proposed Project will result various improvements to the property and building including the following: restripe the parking lot to comply with City parking standards; a new code compliant trash enclosure; new landscaping at the street frontage; removal of an existing nonconforming pole sign; a new storefront entry and storefront glass; painting of the building; new code compliant signage; a new loading area; a new accessible path of travel from sidewalk to store entry; and interior improvements including shelving, coolers, stock room, and ADA compliant restrooms. As outlined herein, the Proposed Project will operate in a manner consistent with the applicant’s existing operation and similar type uses and the subject site would be physically improved. Therefore, subject to the imposed conditions of approval, the Proposed Project will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 3. The Proposed Project will provide various aesthetic and code required improvements to the site and building, but does not involve any expansion of the existing building. The proposed hours of operation are typical for similar types of uses. The existing parking lot will be re-striped and reconfigured to meet current code standards and the proposed use will meet the zoning code required parking. As such, with implementation of the recommended conditions of approval, the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the area or health and safety. 4. The traffic generated by the use proposed under the conditions imposed, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways. Access to the site is provided by an existing driveway off Ball Road. No modifications to the driveway would - 3 - PC2022-*** be required. The traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area. It is not expected that the proposed use would increase the traffic load from the previous convenience store use. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption in conjunction with a convenience store subject to the conditions of approval imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of Anaheim and will provide an added convenience to the immediate neighborhood. Conditions imposed on the project will ensure that potential nuisances associated with the proposed use will be minimized, and the use would compatible with surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a determination of public convenience or necessity, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. - 4 - PC2022-*** 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The subject site is in Census Tract Number 863.06 which has a population of 3,975. This population allows for five on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently no licenses in the tract. It also allows for two off-sale licenses and there is presently one license in the tract. This subject site is within Reporting District 1828 which is 73% above the city average in crime. Since the crime rate is above the citywide average, a determination of public convenience or necessity is required. 6. The request to permit the sales of alcoholic beverage for off-premises consumption in conjunction with a convenience store subject to the conditions of approval imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of Anaheim. The proposed use would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed and will provide an added convenience to the public by providing a location to purchase alcohol that is easily and safely reachable by foot and by patrons in vehicles coming from the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, the proposed location would replace the applicant’s existing location approximately 300 feet to the east, thereby allowing the applicant to maintain his existing customer base. Conditions imposed on the project will ensure that potential nuisances associated with the proposed use will be minimized, and the use would compatible to surrounding land uses. 7. The determination of Public Convenience or Necessity can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guidelines for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim, and; WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Permit No. 2021-00224 for a conditional use permit and a determination of public convenience or necessity, contingent - 5 - PC2022-*** upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Development Permit No. 2021-00224 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Simonne Fannin, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 28, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 7 - PC2022-*** - 8 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00224; (DEV2021-00118) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1. The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Request/Operations Letter submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation, as described in that document(s), shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request/Operations Letter to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 2. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the business premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the business owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied or discovered by the business owner. Planning & Building Department, Code Enforcement Division Police Department 3. The owner/operator shall install and use interior and exterior video surveillance to promote shopper and business safety and the appearance of safety. Video surveillance signs shall be posted notifying the shopper. Police Department 4. The exterior of the building and parking lot shall be illuminated during all hours of darkness. Police Department 5. Trees and shrubs shall be pruned to allow visual access to all parts of the premises. Police Department 6. Entrance windows shall not be covered with posters and announcements that obstruct natural surveillance. Police Department 7. The hours of operation for the liquor store are Monday through Thursday 7am-11pm, Friday and Saturday 7am -12am, and Sunday 8am-10pm as stated by the applicant in the Operations Letter. The Police Department requests the hours of operation to remain the same to monitor calls for service. Police Department Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 8. No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 9. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around the premises. Police Department 10. The owner/operator(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the storefront and the parking area; and shall install a trash receptacle in front of the storefront. Police Department - 9 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 11. Owner/operator(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 12. Check-out counters shall be located near the front of the store, clearly visible from the outside and positioned near the main entrance, so employees can better watch any activities. Police Department 13. Use interior shelving and displays no higher than five feet, less than five feet in front of windows to maintain clear visibility from inside the store, and from the store to the street, sidewalk, parking area, and passing vehicles. Police Department 14. There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 15. There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 16. Managers/Owners shall contact the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS (Responsible Beverage Service), or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 17. The Owner/operator(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign facing the premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows: NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST The sign shall be at least two feet square with two-inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish. Police Department 18. There shall be no tables or seating for customers, no serving of meals or beverages on-site, and no sale of open containers, pre-prepared or mixed alcoholic beverages. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 19. Window signs shall comply with the maximum area allowed by the Zoning Code. At no time shall window signs exceed 20% of the window area. All advertising and signage shall be placed and maintained in a manner that ensures that law enforcement personnel have a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises, including the area in which the cash registers are maintained, from the exterior public sidewalk or entrance to the premises. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Police Department 20 That ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site. Delivery vehicles shall not block any part of the public right of way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering - 10 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 20. That prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer showing a R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign and a right-turn arrow pavement legend at the project driveway. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering That prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show conformance with the current version of Engineering Standard Detail 470 and 473 pertaining to parking standards. NO PARKING pavement markings shall be provided on both sides of trash enclosure. The subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 21. All CBC and CFC requirements shall be followed for permit issuance. Any fire permits which includes fire sprinklers, fire alarm, etc. shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire Prevention Department Fire Department, Community Risk Reduction Division 22. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Development Services 23. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works Department, Development Services 24. Prior to final building and zoning inspections: a. All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. b. All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. c. Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works Department, Development Services 25. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division - 11 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 26. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 27. The business premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the owner/operator, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division Proposed Business: Liquor Store Location: 2429 E ball rd Anaheim, CA 92806 The proposed business is located on a property used to be previously a liquor store. We will operate the business with taking into consideration all the necessary precautions for security and safety as follows: 1. Operation hours for the proposed liquor store: - From 7 am to 11 pm Mon- Thursday. - From 7 am to 12 am Friday and Saturday - From 8 am to 10 pm on Sundays. 2. Number of employees by shift: - There will be one employee to cover the morning shift - 2 employees for the night shift. 3. Safety and Security: - The front window of the store will comply with city recommendations, it will be visible from the outside, will be well lit as well as the outside of the premises. Also, the premises will be monitored through 24 hours video surveillance to maintain a safe and clean premises. - The premises will show the required signs that states no Loitering, and no drinking of alcoholic beverage allowed on premises. 4. percentage of estimated sales: - Sales estimated to be around 85 percent alcoholic beverages and 15 percent will divided between grocery, snacks and tobacco. ATTACHMENT 2 subject S HILDA STE ALKI PLE CALIFPARK WAYE BALL RDE BALL RDE OMEGA AVEE OMEGA AVEE LARK ELLEN LNE RILES CIRS CARL ST SUNKIST ST SUNKIST ST8"8"INTERNATIONAL SYMBOLOF ACCESSIBILITYIN WHITE ON BLUEBACKGROUNDPLATE PER CBC 310770 SQ. IN., 1/4" STEELACCESSIBLEVANPARKINGOF ACCESSIBILITY SIGNSIGN BELOW SYMBOLPLAN FOR LOCATION(S)SPACES - SEE SITEPROVIDE ADDITIONALAND FIELD PAINTENDS, SHOP PRIMEJOINTS, CAP ALL FRAME - WELD ALL1 1/2" X 1 1/2" TUBE STEELH/C SIGNSCOPE OF WORK:·RE-ROUTE PATH OF TRAVEL..·RE-STRIPE PARKING LOT TO MEET NEW REQUIREMENTS.·MOVE (E) ENTRANCE DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.·Remodel (e) bathroom to meet ADA Requirements.·provide electric light covers.·R&r (e) 2x4 ceiling panels and replace damaged ones.·provide concrete sealer for WALK IN COOLER and storage.·cabinetry AND gondolas (by others).·strap new cabinetry to structure.·paint all interior.·repair and paint exterior stucco.·sign (by others).·walking cooler under separate permit (by others).·provide storage as shown on plans.·saw-cut and provide 2 new floor sinks.sheet index:·a1.0 existing AND PROPOSED site plan·a2.0 floor plans·a3.0 elevations AND SECTIONS·a4.0 SPEC SHEET·A5.0 ADA RESTROOM DETAIL - door scheduleproject directory:·owner:elie jalloul·developer: habitant classique, inc109 e arrow hwysan dimas, ca 91773habitantusa@hotmail.com(626)380-8028project datA·apn:253-081-17·type:V non sprinklered·legal description:p bk 26 pg 17 par 2·lot area :0.241 acre·existing building area:2,274 sqft·parking required : 2,274 SF / 250 = 9 stallsparking provided :standard :8 stallshandicap van accessible : 1 stalltotal : 9 stalls·occupancy: m (market) + s (storage)occupant load calculationmarket 1,500/30= 50 occupantsstorage 710.2/300= 2.3 occupantstotal 50+3= 53 occupantsCLe. ball rd.(e) side walk8'-0"60'-4"42'-6" 150'-0"70'-0"(e) driveway approach(e) mart / liquor(2,274 sq. ft.)(e) flat roof(e) side walk(N) SIGN(N) PATH OF TRAVEL 8'-0"VAN ACCESSIBLE(E) FENCE(E) RMUFENCE(N) SIGNp18'-4"line ofstore front refer to 3/a1.0 4/a1.0PLPLPLPL(E) 5' WROUGHT IRON FENCE3"4'-0"18'-0"8'-0"9'-0"6'-6"22'-0" 8'-6"8'-6"8'-6" 18'-0"6'-6"6'-6"8'-6"50'-0"7'-0"50'-0"7'-0"24'-0" 2%SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2%SLOPE 3'-0"5'-0" 6'-6" 53'-0" right-Of-way 30'-0"right-of-wayp4trash enclosureas per City code(scout service)6'-6"8'-0" 3'-2"4'-0" 12'-0" sign rightturn only(n) Landscape to complywith the City guideline8'-0" 2%SLOPE 10'-0" 25'-2"p96'-6"2'-2"loading area24"typ20'-0"20'-0"3'-0"8'-0"18'-0"35'-0"12'-0"24" typ 24" typ2 bins one for recycleone for trash3A3.011A5.1(e) side walk8'-0"60'-4"42'-6"150'-0"70'-0"(e) drivewayapproach(e) mart / liquor(2,274 sq. ft.)9'-0"18'-0"p1(e) flat roof(e)Landscape(e)Landscape(e) side walk8'-0"3"PL21'-5"B.Y.SS.Y.S9'-1"(E) 5' WROUGHTIRON FENCE(E)FENCE(E) RMUFENCEp4p12p8PLPLPL(E) PAKING LOTTO REMAIN(E) PATH OF TRAVELto remove(e) pole sign9'-4"CLe. ball rd.36'-0"12'-0"3'-0"5'-0"24'-0"notes:-a- all signage are under separate permit-b- New landscaping to be installed in existing landscape areas complying with city of anaheim guideline-c- parking striping should 4" wideVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXSCOPE OF WORKSITE PLANS, VICINITY MAP PROJECT DATAA1.0(E) SITE PLANPROJECT DATAWSNESCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"HABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.D E S I G N , E N G I N E E R I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N S E R V I C E SW W W . H A B I T A N T C L A S S I Q U E . C O M109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001T I T L E S H E E TD A T EJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / / 03/07/2022S T A M P DEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/221(N) SITE PLANSCALE : 3/32" = 1'-0"234PROJECT DIRECTORYH/C SIGNATTACHMENT 3 9'-0"6'-0"42'-6"59'-8"7'-0"6'-0"6'-0"(E) SINK TO BErelocated(E) ELECT PANEL(e) 2 compartmentsink to remainexitINFILL (E) OPENING6'-0"PROVIDE (N) ADA EXIT(E) OFFICE3'-0"(N) storage26'-3"9'-4"exit22'-10"3'-0"(N) WALK-IN COOLER(N) WALK-IN COOLER TO REMAIN1'-0" 5'-10"6'-0"26'-3"3'-8"6'-6"8'-0"8'-0"(n)floor sink(e) SINK TO BEREMOVED &REPLACEDBY OTHERSBY OTHERS (e) pay phoneto be removed(e) 2 compartment sink3'-0"(N) WALK-IN COOLER(N) WALK-IN COOLER (e) OFFICE7'-0"(N) EXTIGUISHER2A-10BC min(N) H/C COUNTER 34" HEIGHT MAX 5'-0"5'-0"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"6'-0"5'-0"48" MIN.min. (TYP)18"5'-2"7'-4" 16'-5"6'-0"(N) ACCESSIBLEENTRANCE8'-4" 14'-10"9'-4"22'-11"18'-3"11'-9"6'-0"37'-0" UNISEXrestroom(e) 2 compartment sink18" shelvesA5.06'-10"(N) MOP SINK4'-6"3'-0"12"6'-0"3'-6"39'-10"18"4'-0"6 X 3' = 18'-0" 2 x 3' = 6'-0"16'-6"4'-0" 24"8'9'-0"18"d1d2d3d4D5D6D63A3.0AA3.0by others - SPECS A4-0by others - SPECS A4-0 24"(E) ELECT PANELTO REMAIN(n)floor sink4' - 0 " 5'-10"6'-0"26'-3" 8'-0" 4'-0" 42'-6"exitexit(N) HAND SINK(N) EMPLOYEE LOCKERS9/A5.0A4.0(N) trash receptaclewausau tile push top53 gallon or eq.5'-0"relocated sink(N) SIGN 4/a1.07'-9"BEER DISPLAY GROCERY SNACKS & CHIPS CANDY OVER THE COUNTER MEDECINE GUM SHELVES BELOW THE COUNTER BEER & WINE & LIQUOR LIQUOR & CIGARETTES BEER & WINEDISPLAYSOFT DRINK, ENERGY DRINK, JUICE, COLDCOFFEE, ETC... DISPLAYBEER & WINE & LIQUOR BEER & WINE & LIQUOR BEER & WINE & LIQUOR(N) storage(N) WALK-IN COOLER(N) WALK-IN COOLER (e) OFFICE(N) H/C COUNTER34" HEIGHT MAX(N) ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE UNISEXrestroom(E) ELECT PANEL(n) gfiexitexitF(e)(E) CELING, LIGHTING& A/C TO REMAINGLAZED, 15% ABRASIVEFLOORCERAMIC TILE OR VINYL***BASE COVE W/ 3/8" RADIUS6" HIGH DALTILE A-3601 6"X6" 6"X 8" COVE W/ 3/8" RADIUSSLIM-FOOT TOPSET CERAMICCERAMIC TILE(60" HIGH), CEILING ABOVE SIGNATURECOLORS SMOOTH & WHITE COLORCERAMIC TILE OVER 1/2", DUROCKOR EQUIVALENT TILE BACKER BOARD6"X 8" COVE W/ 3/8" RADIUS(FLUSH W/ FLOOR)CONCRETE W/APPROVEDBASECLEAR SEALER CERAMIC TILEW/APPROVED CLEAR SEALERSMOOTH FINISH "EE2043C END OF PAINTED WITH "SIGNATURE COLORS" RAINBOW"WALLSPAINTED WITH "SIGNATURE COLORS" CEILINGON 5/8"GYP. BOARD.SMOOTH FINISH "EE2043C END OF RAINBOW"PAINTED WITH "SIGNATURE COLORS" ON 5/8"GYP. BOARD. TYPE "X"SMOOTH FINISH "WHITE COLOR"MATTE ARCHITECTURAL GRAY Daltile Sierra Aspen 12 in.x12 in. STORAGEOR EQ.RESTROOMSnon- abrehasive, slip resistant, BACK RM/SALES/OR EQ.CASHIERROOMON 5/8"GYP. BOARD.CERAMIC TILE ***BY: COOLER MFGNSF APPROVED PRE-FABMETAL PANEL SMOOTH FINISH4" APPROVED METALTOPSET COVING SMOOTH FINISH W/A MIN 3/8" RADIUSCOOLERWALK-INMETAL PANEL SMOOTH FINISHNSF APPROVED PRE-FABBY: COOLER MFGCONCRETE SMOOTH FINISHBY: COOLER MFGLARR # 25154SMOOTH FINISH "WHITE COLOR"PAINTED WITH "SIGNATURE COLORS" T-BAR CEILING 2X4 ARMSTRONG OR EQDaltile Polaris Gloss White 8x8legendwall to be demolished(e) wall to remain(n) wallwalk in cooler wall by others(e) fluorescent light to remain(n) gfi CONVENIENCE OUTLET, DUPLEX. +15" AFCILIGHTED EXIT SIGNCEILING MOUNTEDexitF(e) fan to remain(e) a/c supply to remain(e) a/c return to remainW/BACK-UP BATTERYEXISTING & DEMO FLOOR PLAN1SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0"3PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN2SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0"(E) SUSPENDED CEILING PLAN4SCALE : 3/16" = 1'-0"FINISHING SCHEDULEHABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.DESIGN, ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION SERVICESWWW.HABITANTCLASSIQUE .COM109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001TITLE SHEETDATEJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / / 03/07/2022STAMPDEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/22EXISTING & DEMO. PLAN PROPOSED PLAN SUSPENDED CEILING PLANA2.0 exit(e) WALLS(e) ROOF & INSULATION(e) WALLS(e) CONCRETE SLAB(E) SUSPENDED CEILING15'-0"5'-0"2'-10" 10'-0"(E) SIGN(N) DOOR(N) WINDOWACCESSIBLE SIGNEXISTING RAMP15'-0"6'-0"10'-0"KNOX KEY BOXnote:all new signs underseparate permit(E) SIGN(E) DOOR TO BE REMOVED(E) WINDOW TO BE REPLACED WITH DOOR15'-0"10'-0"EXISTING RAMPHABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.DESIGN, ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION SERVICESWWW.HABITANTCLASSIQUE .COM109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001TITLE SHEETDATEJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / / 03/07/2022STAMPDEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/22ELEVATIONS AND SECTION SCALE : 3/8" = 1'-0"PROPOSED STORE FRONT ELEVATIONEXISTING STORE FRONT ELEVATION1SCALE : 3/8" = 1'-0"SCALE : 3/8" = 1'-0"SECTION23A3.0 SPECS.(E) DROPPED ceilingD.F.P.T. W/SHOT PINS.2x stud wall@ 16" O.C5/8" GYP. BD.CERAMIC TILECOVE BASE(E) CONCRETE SLABWALK INCOOLER WALLS(e) ROOF & INSULATIONBOTTOM PLATESHOT PINS OR DRILL 1/2" O HOLE,INSERT 1/2" O HILTI KWIK-BOLT 2-3/4"EMBEDMENT.LA RR23633 @4' O.C.HABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.DESIGN, ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION SERVICESWWW.HABITANTCLASSIQUE .COM109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001TITLE SHEETDATEJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / / 03/07/2022STAMPDEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/223WALL DETAILSCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"SPECIFICATION SHEETA4.04WALK IN COOLER SPECS2MOP SINK SPECS1SHELVES SPECS. FLOOR TILETILE COVE BASECEMENT1/2" PORTLAND 3/8" radius.4" MIN.13. DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO 5 POUNDS14. UNISEX FACILITIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A CIRCLE 1/4" THICK, 12" IN DIAMETER, WITH A 1/4" THICK TRIANGLE SUPERIMPOSED ON THE CIRCLE AND WITHIN THE 12" DIAMETER. SHOW FOR EXTERIOR RESTROOM.TO THE LATCH OUTSIDE THE RESTROOM DOOR. MOUNTING HEIGHTSHALL BE 60 INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE SIGN. 15. BRAILLE SIGNAGE SHALL BE MOUNTED ON THE WALL ADJACENT and should go from 90 degrees open topermitting the door to be opened by a wheelchair footrest without creating a trap or hazardous condition.8.Limit door operating force in compliance with Chapter 11b-309.4 & 1010.1.3. Operable parts shall be operable with onehand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist. The force required to activateoperable parts shall be 5 pounds (22 N) maximum.9.Provide door opening hardware complying with chapter 11b-404.2.7. hand-activated door Opening hardware between34" min. and 44" above the finish floor. Hand activates latching and locking doors, located in the path of travel,shall be operable with single effort by lever type hardware, by panic bars, push– pull activating bars, or otherhardware designed to provide passage without requiring the ability to tightly grasp, tightly pinch or twist the wristto open. Locked exit doors shall be accessible as Specified in direction of egress.10.Provide thresholds complying with chapter 11b-404.2.6.11.All egress doors should be openable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge or effort.12.THE EXTERIOR AND RESTROOM DOORS ARE SELF-CLOSING AND THAT ALL EXTERIOR WINDOWS ARE FIXED.12 degree opened in no less than 5 secondsIF WALL MOUNTED.1. DIMENSIONS FOR LOCATIONS OF RESTROOM FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT ARE from finish wall3. ACCESSORIES SHALL NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 4" FROM WALL SURFACEOR NOT FURNISHED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR.2. G.C. TO PROVIDE BLOCKING FOR ALL ACCESSORIES AND FIXTURES WHETHER DESCRIPTIONID. #B-6857MANUF.BOBRICKDISPENSER AND WASTE RECEPTACLEB-3944BOBRICKRECESSED COMBINATION PAPER TOWELSINGLE ROLL (SURFACE MOUNT.), SATIN FINISHITEMQTY.11TOILET PAPER DISP.111MARK11PAPER TOWEL DISP./WASTE RECEPTACLERestroom AccessoriesSATIN FINISH1 1/2" DIA. CONCEALED MOUNTING, B-6806BOBRICKGRAB BARSURFACE MOUNTED, SATIN FINISHB-4221BOBRICKDISPENSERTOILET SEAT COVERB-2111BOBRICKSTEEL LATHER VALVE, CAPACITY: 40 FL. OZ.WALL MOUNTED, SATIN FINISH, STAINLESS STEELCONTAINER, VANDAL-RESISTANT LID, STAINLESSSOAP DISPENSER1B-165 (1830)BOBRICK18x30 STAINLESS STEEL FRAMED MIRRORMIRRORB-6827BOBRICK11 GAUGE, STAINLESS STEEL, SATIN FINISHCOAT HOOK1.5 GALLONS PER FLUSH MAXIMUMINSULATE OR COVER HOT WATER SUPPLY AND DRAIN PIPES. NO SHARP OR ABRASIVE SURFACES ARE ALLOWED UNDER LAVATORIES.W/4" LEVER HANDLES OR COMPARABLE AMERICAN STANDARD FIXTURES.AND NO. 559-2550 CENTER SET LAVATORY FAUCET FOR 4" CENTERSNO. 803-0530 OFFSET DRAIN, NO. 804-1180 CAST BRASS 'P' TRAPCONCEALED ARM CARRIER FURNISHED SEPARATELY BY G.C. USE ELJERCENTERS. WALL HUNG LAVATORY WITH WALL HANGER FOR USE WITHLAVATORY - AMERICAN STANDARD REGALYN NO. 4867.016 19" x 17" W/ 4"WATER CLOSET - KOHLER "HIGHLINE LITE PC" PNEUMATICALLY ASSISTEDFLUSH TANK NO. K-3544 WITH LOCKING COVER AND K-4650 SEAT SURFACE MOUNTEDBOBRICKSANITARY NAPKINDISPOSALOR EQB-270NOTE:CONTROLS FOR WATERCLOSETS AND LAVATORIESSHALL BE ON THE WIDE SIDE.4. When a threshold is used, it shall be a maximum of 2 inches (50.8 mm) in height andhave a beveled or sloped angle not exceeding 1 unit vertical in 2 unitshorizontal (26.6 degrees from the horizontal). Thresholds 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) orless in height may have a beveled or sloped angle not exceeding 1 unitvertical in 1 unit horizontal (45 degrees from the horizontal).5. Faucet controls and operation mechanisms shall be operable with one handand shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist. Theforce required to activate controls shall be no greater than 5 pounds (22.2N). Lever operated, push-type and electronically controlled mechanisms areexamples of acceptable designs.GRAB BARS SHALL NOT ROTATE.WALL AND BAR IS TO BE 1 1/2"AN EQUIVALENT GRIPPING SURFACE.GRAB BARS AND MOUNTINGS SHALL WITHSTAND 250 LBS. PROVIDE 2X8 SOLIDBLOCKING IN WALLS @ WALL MOUNTED ACCESSORIES (TYP.).AS 36". BARS AT SIDE TO BE 42" LONG WITH FRONT END 24" IN FROMTOILET WHICH OBSTRUCTS PLACEMENT, THE GRAB BAR MAY BE AS HIGH33" ABOVE AND PARALLEL TO THE FLOOR, EXCEPT WITH A TANK-TYPELOCATE GRAB BARS ON EACH SIDE OR ONE SIDE AND BACK OF TOILET,OR ABRASIVE ELEMENTS. EDGES ARE TO HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 1/8".GRAB BARS AND ANY SURFACE ADJACENT TO THEM CANNOT HAVE ANY SHARPIF GRAB BARS ARE MOUNTED ADJACENT TO WALL THE SPACE BETWEENSURFACE IS REQUIRED TO BE 1 1/4" TO 1 1/2", OR SHAPE IS TO PROVIDETOILET. BARS IN BACK TO BE 36" LONG. DIAMETER OR WIDTH OF GRIPPING5.4.3.2.1.SECTION THROUGH TYP. GRAB BAR1 1/2" MAX.1 1/2"BLOCKINGLAG SCREW 1/4" X 2 1/2"TILE BURGLAR-PROOFCONCEALEDPAN WHERE REQUIREDCLOSER - PROVIDE TILECONCEALED FLOORINTERIOR FLOORING -SEE FINISH SCHEDULESTOP ON THRESHOLDSEE CIVILTHRESHOLD - SEEHADRDWARE SCH.EXTERIOR PAVINGBOTTOM SWEEP1/4"INT.EXT.1/2" maxTHAT DOES NOT REQUIRE tight TWISTING, tight PINCHING6'-8"1'-0"6"EQ.EQ.SLOPE TOP- PROVIDE LATCH AND LOCKING HARDWARE OR tight Grasping TO OPERATE.- PROVIDE SHELF AND POLE AT 48" MAX. Above Finished EQ.EQ. floor and lower shelve should be located at 15" above finished floor TILE COVE BASEFLOOR TILEBASE CABINETCEMENT1/2" PORTLAND 3/8" radius.4" MIN.AND EXTENDS 4" UP THE WALL AND IS * ALL COVE BASE TO BE 3/8" RADIUS, INSTALLED IN A SEAMLESS MANNERdoors scheduleCIRCLE marksizelocationmaterialtypeQty.d1refer to detail 5/a5.0HINGE DOOR1d236" x 80" X 2OFFICEhinge door1d336" x 80"ENTRANCE doorALUMINUM - existing to remainhinge doord436" x 80"wood doorselected by ownerHINGE doorD536" X 80"RESTROOMALUMINUM - tempered double glazing - self closingD6STORAGE ROOM36" x 80"EXIT DOORselected by ownerREMARKSselected by ownerselected by owner(e) wood door to remain - w/door closerWALK IN COOLERBY OTHERShinge door1112(e) wood door to remainDOOR NOTES1.ALL EXIT DOORS SHALL BE OPERABLE WITH A SINGLE EFFORT WITHOUT REQUIRING THE ABILITY TO GRASP THE HARDWARE. dOORHARDWARE IS TO BE LOCATED 34"MIN. TO 44" MAX. ABOVE FINISH FLOOR PER CBC 11B-404. DOORS SHALL BE OPENABLE FROM THEINSIDE WITHOUT THE USE OF A KEY OR ANY SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE.2.WEATHER STRIP ALL EXTERIOR DOORS.3.MOUNT HARDWARE PER LATEST EDITION OF GOVERNING CODE.4.ALL GLAZED DOORS AND RESTROOM DOORS SHALL HAVE 10" KICK PLATE.5.Provide Hydraulic closers 5 LBS max pressure and 3 sec. delay action TYP. where indicated the DOOR schedule.6.Provider activated air curtain where indicated the door schedule.7.Provide the bottom 10 inches of all doors (except automatic and sliding doors) with a smooth uninterrupted surfacepermitting the door to be opened by a wheelchair footrest without creating a trap or hazardous condition.UNISEXCLEAR6'-6"(E) ELECT PANELto remain12" max42" min24" minclear opening 32"12" min1'-6"36" min4'-0"5'-10"3'-0"1'-6"12" maxPAPER TOILET HOLDERROLLER CENTERAT 40" MAX H.2'-4"4'-0"9'-0"R2'-6"3'-8"(N) GRAB BARSHEIGHT MIN 33" - MAX 36"TO TOP OF CIRCULAR BAR(N) GRAB BARSHEIGHT MIN 33" - MAX 36"TO TOP OF CIRCULAR BAR2A5.018"(N) HAND SINK3'-4" MAX 0'-9" 2'-5" MIN. 2'-10" MAX.8" MAX.40" MAX. 33" MIN - 36" MAX TOP OF BAR (TYP) 19" MIN.12"12" MAXCL42" MIN54" MIN7" MIN9" MAX24" MIN17" MIN - 19" MAX 2X8 CONT. BRACINGBEHIND LAVATORY& GRAB BARINSTULATION(E) ELECTRICAL PANEL2'-10" 3 A5.0 A5.0RESTROOM SECTION28GRAB BAR NOTES3ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM NOTES7SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM & DETAILS4 TILE BASE @ RESTROOMNTSTILE BASE DETAILNTS56 STOREFRONT DOOR9DOOR SCHEDULELOCKER DETAILNTSNTSNTSHABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.DESIGN, ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION SERVICESWWW.HABITANTCLASSIQUE .COM109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001TITLE SHEETDATEJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / /03/07/2022STAMPDEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/22 6"x6"X16" concrete blocks,grout all cells solid#4 rebar @ 24" oc6"5'-6"24"36"12"2'-9"6" 2" X 2" X 316"angle curb guardon next to last courseuse bond beam blockswith #4 rebar6"8'-0"6"finish gradearea in front toremain clear toenable bins to berolled out for pickup2A5.1 door frame34" solidslide slot6"3"3"1" pipeskin: any material exceptchain link or grape stakedo not use canebolt from bottom ofdoor to pavementbar weldedto inside ofboth doorswelded door frame of 2"square tube or 2 12" anglebottom of door should be high enoughto pass clear above any adjacent curbfinish gradedoor frameconcreteblock2 1/2" X 2 1/2" X 14"square tubingwelded hinge180 degree swingdoor jamb post to beset in concrete as shown18"36"finishgradeCONCRETE1SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" PLAN 1N.T.S. SECTION 21HINGE DETAIL 4N.T.S.LATCH DETAIL 5HINGE DETAIL 6N.T.S.DOOR JAMB 3A5.1TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"HABITANT CLASSIQUE INC.DESIGN, ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION SERVICESWWW.HABITANTCLASSIQUE .COM109 E. ARROW HWY., SAN DIMAS, CA 91773PHONE: (626) 380-8028 FAX: (909) 394-2001DATEJOB NO.BID SETPLAN CHECKPERMIT SETPRINT DATE#2123 / / / / / /03/07/2022STAMPDEVELOPED FOR TENANT IMPROVEMENT LIQUOR STORE ELIE JALLOUL 2429 E BALL RD, ANAHIEM, CA 9280603/31/22 ATTACHMENT 4 C-G RETAIL RM-4 THE VILLAGER APARTMENTS 190 DU RM-4 CASA MADRID APARTMENTS 288 DU C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL O-L MEDICAL OFFICE C-G SERVICE STATION RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 TRIPLEX RM-4 TRIPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEXRM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEXRM-4 FOUR PLEXRS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE E BALL RD S SUNKIST STE CLIFPARK WAY S ATHENA WAY E ALKI PL E WHIDBY LN S HILDA ST E RILES CIR E OMEGA AVE E HILDA PL E. B A L L R D S. SUNKIST STS. EAST ST E. C E R R I T O S A V E S. STATE COLLEGE BLVDE. HOWELL AVE 2429 EAST BALL ROAD DEV No. 2021-00224 Subject Property APN: 253-081-17 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 C-G DEV2019-0024 RETAIL ATTACHMENT 5 E BALL RD S SUNKIST STE CLIFPARK WAY S ATHENA WAY E ALKI PL S CARL STE WHIDBY LN S HILDA ST S SUNBURST WAYE RILES CIR E OMEGA AVES LARAMIE STE HILDA PL E. B A L L R D S. SUNKIST STS. EAST ST E. C E R R I T O S A V E S. STATE COLLEGE BLVDE. HOWELL AVE 2429 EAST BALL ROAD DEV No. 2021-00224 Subject Property APN: 253-081-17 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MARCH 28, 2022 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 LOCATION: This property is generally located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, approximately 150 feet south of Romneya Drive (1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 West Victor Avenue). APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The property owner is Dennis S. Riff and the applicant is City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC, represented by Kim Prijatel. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) and tentative tract map to allow the construction of a 31-unit, attached single-family residential project (townhomes) with modified development standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; and: 1) By motion, adopt the attached draft resolution for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117 (Attachment 1); and 2) Adopt the attached draft resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19170 (Attachment 2) BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the March 14, 2022 Planning Commission meeting. This 1.75-acre property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone and is developed with three commercial buildings. The site is designated for Low Medium density land uses in the General Plan. There are a motel and mobile home park uses adjacent to the north, commercial uses across Harbor Boulevard to the east, commercial uses adjacent to the south and single-family residential uses across Victor Avenue, and multiple-family and single-family uses to the west. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 7 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct a 31-unit attached, single-family residential development (townhomes) using the RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential zone development standards. The units would be in six three-story buildings, ranging from four to seven units per building. The units would consist of an attached two-car garage, with six different plan types of two to four bedrooms, and ranging in size from 1,002 to 1,814 square feet. The project would provide access from Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The project would also require a 25- foot dedication along Harbor Boulevard that would include new landscaping and sidewalk. A new parkway and sidewalk would also be constructed along Victor Avenue. The portion of the property along Romneya Avenue would require a 12-foot dedication and include demolition of the existing driveway and construction of a new parkway and sidewalk. The project would have a modern contemporary architectural design with a variety of materials including stucco, stone veneer, metal awnings, and fiber cement sidings. The color palette would include a mix of whites, greys, blues, with yellows. The first story would include stucco with stone veneer accents. The second and third stories would be painted white and contrasting grays, and would incorporate stucco and fiber cement siding in white, shades of gray and blue, and ochre. Townhomes with second-story decks would have contrasting metal railings. Decorative metal accents are proposed on third story windows for façade articulation. The project architecture and design would also incorporate façade variations to provide further articulation. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Recreational-Leisure Area: A total of 12,941 square feet of recreational area is proposed, and 10,850 square feet is required. This area would be provided through a combination of common areas and private decks and patios. The common area would consist of a lawn area, shade structure and seating, and a fenced and landscaped dog park. Site Plan: The applicant requests to modify the minimum required setbacks between buildings where the Municipal Code requires a 40-foot setback, and the interior structural setback where the Code requires a 20-foot setback. The project would provide varied building-to-building setbacks, with a 25-foot setback at the narrowest point, and a 15-foot interior structural setback at the narrowest point. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested entitlement action: Conditional Use Permit: Pursuant to the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act (HAA), most recently amended in 2019, properties with a General Plan designation that allows for residential uses, but that have a zoning designation that does not allow for residential uses, are not required to reclassify the property’s zoning to be consistent with the General Plan when residential uses are proposed. Rather, the property may be developed for residential uses in accordance with the density prescribed by the General Plan land use designation. In this instance, the General Plan designates the subject property for Low Medium Density land uses, which allows residential density at 18 dwelling units per acre, and the property’s zoning is General Commercial. Therefore, pursuant to the HAA, the property would be subject to the RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential zone development standards, which is the implementing zone for the Low Medium Density General Plan designation, and would not require a zoning reclassification. Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit for a multiple-family development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The uses within the project are compatible; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 4 of 7 2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing buildings conform with the provisions of this title; 3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; 5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and 8) The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The project complies with the development standards of the RM-3 zone with the exception of the building-to-building and interior setbacks. In the RM-3 zone, development standards, including setbacks, may be modified as part of a conditional use permit as described below. Building-to-Building Setback: The applicant requests to modify the minimum required setbacks to 25-feet, where the Municipal Code requires a 40-foot separation between three-story buildings with parallel walls that are designated as “primary” walls. Primary walls are building walls that contain an entrance and/or windows opening into living areas. Setbacks for projects in the RM-3 zone may be modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The proposed project would provide reduced building-to-building setbacks of 25-feet at the narrowest point, and this is consistent with modifications granted previously to similar projects. The three-story primary building elevations would be separated by attractive landscaped paseos, common area landscape, or drive aisles for garages, and would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. The elevations would also be enhanced and articulated with quality design features. The proposed modification would help achieve a functional, pedestrian-friendly design and provide for a high-quality living environment. Interior Setback: The applicant requests to modify the interior setback along the south property line adjacent to the commercial property. The Code identifies structural setback requirements based on building height and building wall categories. Primary building walls contain entrances and exits and/or windows opening into living spaces where most activity occurs, such as dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms, kitchens and bedrooms. Secondary building walls contain windows opening into bathrooms, closets, stairwells and corridors. Buildings 1 and 2 of the project are proposed with three-story primary walls adjacent to the south property line setback a minimum of 15 feet where the Code requires 20 feet. The Code requires a 15-foot setback for secondary walls of a three-story structure. Though defined as a primary wall CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 5 of 7 because it would include a kitchen window on the second floor, the project design would include only bathroom windows on the third floor (one of which would be setback 15-feet as shown in in the figure below). Since the design would be limited to bathroom windows on the third floor and these buildings would be adjacent to a commercial use, staff believes the reduced setback would provide good design that is compatible with existing development and meets the intent of the interior setback requirement. Interior Setback Modification Parking Requirements: The Municipal Code requires 93 parking spaces for the proposed project. The project has been designed to provide 93 with 62 spaces in private, attached garages and 31 open parking spaces. Eight of these garages would be in tandem configuration, which is allowed by Code. Condition of Approval No. 10 in the draft CUP resolution requires the submittal of Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (CC&Rs) with requirements for parking areas, including that garages shall only be used for the parking of vehicles, and Attachment 4 describes how residents will be alerted to rules related to parking and how such rules will be enforced. Specifically, the applicant states: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 6 of 7 “To ensure the garage parking spaces remain open for the use of residential parking, all owners will be required to sign a disclosure (or CC&Rs) that specifies that only the parking of vehicles will be permitted in the designated parking areas and garages. In no instance shall items be stored in garages so as to impede the parking of two vehicles. Furthermore, the tandem spaces will be in a private, attached garage assigned to the same unit. The HOA management will be responsible for enforcement for quarterly inspections to ensure that no personal items are being stored in the garage parking spaces.” Affordable Housing: In 2018, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-106, which is a policy statement that encourages a dialogue between City staff and residential developers to consider options and approaches for addressing the City’s affordable housing needs. Pursuant to the resolution, City staff and the applicant discussed potential options to support the creation of affordable housing. Although the applicant does not propose any affordable units, the applicant has met with the Housing and Community Development Department and complied with this policy. Community Outreach and Correspondence: The applicant held a community Zoom meeting online, on September 8, 2021. A meeting notice was sent to all owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the project. Ten neighbors attended the meeting. The applicant answered their questions and addressed any concerns. The applicant has provided a summary of the community outreach meeting (Attachment 7). As of the date of this staff report, no additional correspondence has been received. Environmental Impact Analysis: The Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). Based on the analysis in the CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption Environmental Checklist (Attachment 3) staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further environmental review is required. CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is designed in a manner that will provide a quality living environment for its future residents and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. Staff recommends approval of the proposed request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 March 28, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP Niki Wetzel, AICP Senior Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Draft Tentative Tract Map Resolution 3. Class 32 Exemption 4. Project Description 5. Project Justification Letter 6. Project Plans 7. Community Outreach Summary C-G BUSINESS SCHOOL C-G CARL'S JR. C-G Starbucks C-G VACANT PR LA PALMA PARK & STADIUM RM-4 (MHP) MOBILEHOME PARK 50 RESIDENTS C-G PALM MOTOR LODGE C-G RETAIL T CITY OF FULLERTON WATER WELLS & PUMPING PLANT C-G RELIGIOUS USE C-G SERVICE STATIONC-GAUTO DEALERSHIPC-G TRAILER PARK 7 RESIDENTS RM-4 CORAL TREE APTS 17 DU RM-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE -- FAMILY -- RESIDENCEC-G PRESCHOOL RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERM-3FOURPLEXRM-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-4 OFFICES PRSPORTS FIELDPROFFICESPROFFICESC-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-4 OFFICES RM-4 OFFICES C-G SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N HARBOR BLVDW VICTOR AVE W JULIANNA ST W ROMNEYA DR N HOMER STN RIVIERA STN RALEIGH STN RAVENNA STN LA PALMA PARK WAY W CARL KARCHER WAY N. EUCLID STW. LA PALMA AVE N. EAST STE. LA PALMA AVE N. ANAHEI M BLVDN. HARBOR BLVD10 7 5 -10 8 5 N H ar b o r Bl vd , 5 2 3 W V ic to r A ve DE V N o . 2 0 2 1 -00 0 23 Subject Property APN: 271-071-07 271-071-08 271-071-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 20 21 ! C-GDEV2021-00023MEDICAL OFFICE, RETAIL, VACANT N HARBOR BLVDW VICTOR AVE W JULIANNA ST W ROMNEYA DR N HOMER STN RIVIERA STN RALEIGH STN RAVENNA STN LA PALMA PARK WAY W CARL KARCHER WAY N. EUCLID STW. LA PALMA AVE N. EAST STE. LA PALMA AVE N. ANAHEI M BLVDN. HARBOR BLVD10 7 5 -10 8 5 N H ar b o r Bl vd , 5 2 3 W V ic to r A ve DE V N o . 2 0 2 1 -00 0 23 Subject Property APN: 271-071-07 271-071-08 271-071-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 20 21 ! [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00023) (1075-1085 NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD AND 523 WEST VICTOR AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117 to permit the construction of a 31-unit attached, single-family residential project with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in building-to-building setbacks and interior structural setbacks for that certain real property generally located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard approximately 150 feet south of Romenya Drive, commonly referred to as 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 West Victor Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.75 acres in size and is currently developed with three commercial buildings. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low Medium density residential land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property, and pursuant to the provisions of the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, single-family, attached dwelling developments within the RM-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone are subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Table 6-A of Section 18.06.030 (Uses). Pursuant to subsection .030 of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), the minimum setbacks set forth in Section.090 of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) may be modified in order to achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If approved, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117 will permit the reduction in building-to- building setbacks and interior structural setbacks; and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing and continued the public hearing to March 28, 2022, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117 and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, - 2 - PC2022-*** the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In -Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .050 (Findings) of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117: 1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code because the project will implement the RM-3 zone standards pursuant to the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code, thereby allowing single-family attached residential uses subject to approval of a conditional use permit; 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the project is a townhome development designed at a density and scale that is compatible with the surrounding multiple-family residential, single-family residential, and commercial land uses in the vicinity. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the Project will include Code compliant parking, recreational areas, and sufficient building setbacks from the from surrounding properties. The Proposed Project will also include buildings that will be adequately setback from the surrounding structures to create massing that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because improvements to the public right-of-way and the project’s access will be constructed in accordance with City standards and are designed to carry the traffic in the area; 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and 6. The setback modifications achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The proposed design would include elevations that will be separated by attractive landscaped paseos, common area landscape, or drive aisles for garages, and would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. Buildings 1 and 2 of the project are proposed with three-story primary walls adjacent to the south property line and setback a minimum of 15-feet; though defined as a primary wall because it would include a kitchen window on the second floor, the project design would - 3 - PC2022-*** include only bathroom windows on the third floor. Since the design would be limited to bathroom windows on the third floor and these buildings would be adjacent to a commercial use, the project will provide good design that is compatible with existing development and meets the intent of the interior setback requirement. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim does approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117 the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter - 4 - PC2022-*** 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) - 5 - PC2022-*** I, Simonne Fannin, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 28, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2022-*** - 7 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06117, (DEV2021-00023) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 The Owner/Developer shall prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 2 The Owner/Developer shall prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 3 The Owner/Developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of any permits. Public Works, Development Services 4 The Owner/Developer shall ensure that all required plans and studies are prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in State of California. Public Works, Development Services 5 The Owner/Developer shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number Public Works, Development Services 6 The Owner/Developer shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services 7 The Owner/Developer shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects, identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; Public Works, Development Services - 8 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. 8 The Owner/Developer shall submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 9 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans to Public Utilities Water Engineering for review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 10 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Owner/Developer shall submit draft CC&Rs that are prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Planning and Building Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: a. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking areas, including the parking areas inside garages, only for the parking of vehicles. b. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the management or City of Anaheim staff. c. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Planning Director, or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. d. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs, and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the Rules and Regulations relative to common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division; Public Works, Development Services and Traffic Engineering 11 The Owner/Developer shall record Tract Map No. 19170 pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Code. Provide a duplicate phot Mylar of the recorded map to the City Engineer’s office. Public Works, Development Services 12 The Owner/Developer shall provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 13 The Owner/Developer shall abandon/quitclaim all existing easements in conflict with the proposed improvements on the project site. Public Works, Development Services 14 The Owner/Developer shall design full improvements per City Standards for all impacted public streets/facilities in accordance with City Code, Standards, and Specifications. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited to the following: curb removal, new curb and gutter, new commercial driveway approaches, new sidewalk at the ultimate right-of- Public Works, Development Services - 9 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT way location along Romneya Drive and Victor Avenue, and parkway landscaping with irrigation along Romneya Drive and Victor Avenue. 15 The Owner/Developer shall upsize the existing substandard 6-inch sewer main in Victor Avenue per the sewer study recommendation for this project and design and construct 10-inch sewer main improvements from the point of connection in Victor Avenue to the City Sewer line in Harbor Boulevard. Public Works, Development Services 16 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained by the Owner/Developer from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 17 The Owner/Developer shall ensure all landscape plans comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance complies with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Public Works, Development Services 18 The Owner/Developer shall submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works, Development Services 19 The Owner/Developer shall pay cash in lieu fee for the construction of the required ultimate public improvements along the project frontage of Harbor Boulevard, Romneya, Drive, and Victor Avenue per City of Anaheim Standard No. 160-A. The improvements include but are not limited to the following items: street widening, new pavement section, utilities relocation, concrete curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaped parkway with irrigation, driveway approach, parkway culvert, street light, and other appurtenances. The cash in lieu fee shall also include the removal of all improvements within the ultimate right of way area along Harbor Boulevard (landscaping, trees, walkway, fences, etc.). Public Works, Development Services 20 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided by the Owner/Developer and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 21 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer showing a R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign and a right-turn arrow pavement legend at the project driveway on Harbor Boulevard. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 22 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer showing a R6-1(R) (ONE-WAY) sign on the median directly in front of project driveway for review and approval. The sign shall be installed prior to the first building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 23 The property owner/project developer shall design and modify the existing median on Harbor Boulevard to restrict the access at the project driveway on Harbor Blvd to right-turn in/out only. Prior to the issuance of the building permits, the property Owner/Developer shall submit median modification Public Works, Traffic Engineering - 10 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT plans to the Public Works Department. All median modifications and improvements shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspection. 24 Prior to the issuance of building permits, street improvement plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer to the Public Works Department – Traffic Engineering for review and approval of proposed signing and/or red curb painting. Signage and curb painting modifications shall be installed per the approved plans and shall be completed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 25 That prior to issuance of building permits, a bond shall be posted by the Owner/Developer for all traffic related improvements including, but not limited to striping, signage, and median modifications as required for said project. All improvements identified as required for the project opening shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 26 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537- 537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 27 The Owner/Developer shall ensure all backflow equipment is located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 28 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted by the Owner/Developer through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 29 The Owner/Developer shall ensure all existing water services and fire services conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded by the Owner/Developer if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 30 The Owner/Developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 11 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement, and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. 31 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 32 Water improvement plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 33 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations, and shall be provided by the Owner/Developer. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 34 All California Building Code (CBC) and California Fire Code (CFC) requirements shall be followed by the Owner/Developer for permit issuance. Any fire permits shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire Prevention Bureau. Anaheim Fire & Rescue PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 35 All public improvements shall be constructed by the Owner/Developer, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 36 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full by the Owner/Developer. Public Works, Development Services 37 The Owner/Developer shall set all Monuments in accordance with the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services - 12 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 38 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted by the Owner/Developer for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services. Public Works, Development Services 39 Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections, the property Owner/Developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City Engineer, Planning and Building Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an amendment to the CC&R’s approved by the City Engineer, Planning and Building Director and the City Attorney's office shall be recorded. Gates, if any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 40 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 41 A second on-site fire hydrant for this project shall be provided by the Owner/Developer and located within the project parcel. Anaheim Fire & Rescue 42 Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. Police Department GENERAL 43 The Owner/Developer shall ensure that monument signs and addresses are well lighted during hours of darkness. Police Department 44 Adequate lighting of parking lots, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided by the Owner/Developer with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. The minimum recommended lighting level for covered portions of all parking structures is 1 foot-candle maintained, measured at the parking Police Department - 13 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT surface, with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 10:1. Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. 45 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 46 The Owner/Developer is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 47 The Applicant/Owner/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant/Owner/Developer’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 48 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00023) (1075-1085 NORTH HARBOR BOULEVARD AND 523 WEST VICTOR AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19170 to establish a 31-unit subdivision for 31 attached single-family homes for that certain real property generally located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard approximately 150 feet south of Romenya Drive, commonly referred to as 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 West Victor Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 19170 is proposed in conjunction with approval of a conditional use permit to permit the construction of 31 attached single-family residences. Development Project No. 2021-00023 including the conditional use permit, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.75 acres in size and is currently developed with three commercial buildings. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low Medium density residential land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property, and pursuant to the provisions of the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In -Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387); and - 2 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, on March 14, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing and continued the public hearing to March 28, 2022, 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed subdivision of the Property is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the Low Medium density residential land use designation which provides for development up to 18 dwelling units per acre; 2. The proposed design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim including street and utility improvements; 3. The proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the “RM-3” Multiple-Family Residential zone, which is the implementing zone for the Low-Medium density land use designation as required pursuant to California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code; 4. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project in that the 1.75 acre site allows for the development of the 31-unit attached single-family residential subdivision in compliance with the RM-3 zone development standards; 5. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified; 6. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19170 or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems; 7. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, or the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares - 3 - PC2022-*** that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19170, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06117, now pending; and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 2022. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section 17.08.170 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. - 4 - PC2022-*** CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Simonne Fannin, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 28, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19170 (DEV2021-00023) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP 1 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the right-of- way easements along Harbor Boulevard and Romneya Drive , as shown on TTM19170 and in locations listed below: a) 25.25 feet additional dedication along Harbor Boulevard frontage to achieve the ultimate half-street width of 60 feet from street centerline to property line. b) 12 feet additional dedication along Romneya Avenue frontage to achieve the ultimate half-street width of 32 feet from street centerline. Public Works, Development Services 2 All existing structures in conflict with the future property lines shall be demolished. The Owner/Developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division prior to any demolition work. Public Works, Development Services 3 The vehicular access rights to public streets shall be released and relinquished by the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim, except at approved driveway openings, as shown on the Tentative Tract Map Public Works, Development Services 4 The Owner/Developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 5 The Owner/Developer shall submit improvement plans for the construction of required public improvements along the project frontage of Harbor Boulevard, Romneya Avenue, and Victor Avenue to the Public Works Development Services Division for review, approval, and to determine the bond amounts. Public Works, Development Services 6 The final map shall be submitted by the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works, Development Services 7 The Owner/Developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 8 The Owner/Developer shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit shall be in accordance to City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services - 6 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 9 The Owner/Developer shall provide a Monumentation bond in an amount specified in writing by a Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works, Development Services 10 The Owner/Developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 11 The Owner/Developer shall design all public improvements in accordance with City standards and specifications. Public street improvements shall meet all City standards and requirements. Public Works, Development Services 12 The Owner/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 1 CITY OF ANAHEIM Environmental Checklist Form Class 32 Categorical Exemption Infill Development Projects CASE NO.: DEVELOPMENT CASE NO. 2021-00023 PROJECT APPLICANT: NAME: Kim Prijatel COMPANY: City Ventures ADDRESS: 3121 Michaelson Drive, Suite 150 CITY/ST/ZIP: Irvine, CA 92612 E-MAIL:Prijatel@cityventures.com PHONE:949.258.7540 LEAD AGENCY AND STAFF CONTACT: LEAD AGENCY: City of Anaheim STAFF CONTACT: Andy T. Uk ADDRESS: 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 CITY/ST/ZIP: Anaheim, CA 92805 E-MAIL:AUk@anaheim.net PHONE:714.765.5238 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 West Victor Avenue APN(s): 271-071-07, -08, and-10 ATTACHMENT 3 City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location and Setting The project site is located at 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 West Victor Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. The L-shaped project site is legally described as Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 271-071-07, -08, and-10, totaling approximately 1.75 acres. The site is bordered by Romneya Drive, the Palm Motor Lodge, and a mobile home park to the north, Harbor Boulevard to the east, a commercial strip mall and Victor Avenue to the south, and single-family and multi-family residences to the west. Regional vehicular access to the project site is provided via State Route 91 (SR-91) and Interstate 5 (I-5) approximately 0.23-mile north and 1.35 miles south of the site respectively. Local access is currently provided from Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The project site is depicted in a regional and local context on Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning describes in greater detail the surrounding land uses and zoning. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Direction Existing Land Uses Zone Classification North Palm Motor Lodge and Mobile Home Park north of project site. Single-family residences north of Romneya Drive with commercial uses fronting on to Harbor Boulevard. C-G General Commercial RS-2 Single Family Residential and C-G General Commercial South Existing commercial strip mall. Single-family residences south of Victor Avenue. C-G General Commercial RS-2 Single Family Residential East Harbor Pacific Plaza commercial retail strip mall across Harbor Boulevard. La Palma Park. C-G General Commercial PR Public Recreational West Existing multi-family and single-family residences directly west of the project site along Victor Avenue and Romneya Drive. RM-4 Multiple-Family Residential (up to 36 du/ac) RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential (up to 18 du/ac) Source: City of Anaheim. Property Info Map. Available at https://gis.anaheim.net/PropertyInfo/?APN=12809110. Accessed on January 18, 2022. Existing Conditions The project site is developed with no natural features. It is relatively flat and has an elevation of approximately 154 feet above mean sea level. The project site is currently occupied by three separate commercial buildings totaling 13,480 square feet with surface parking within the La Palma Park Plaza. Two building front on to Harbor Boulevard and one building fronts on to Victor Avenue. From south to north, there are three tenants in the one-story commercial building on Harbor Boulevard: El Naranjito Mexican Grill, Angeles Hair Design, and Anaheim Clinical Trials. The free-standing two-story medical office building is also occupied by Anaheim Clinical Trials and is located north of the one-story commercial building. Surface parking is located between the buildings and Harbor Boulevard. There are two existing driveways on Harbor Boulevard providing access to these uses as well as the one-story commercial building located on the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard at Victor Avenue; this commercial building is not a part of the project. Landscaping and signage for the on-site uses is provided between the surface parking area and the pedestrian sidewalk along Harbor Boulevard. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 3 A separate one-story building is located east of the one-story commercial building that fronts on to Harbor Boulevard. This separate building has a gated surface parking lot that is accessed from Victor Avenue as well as gated access from the surface parking lot for the land uses along Harbor Boulevard. Decorative wrought-iron fencing and landscaping is provided along the site frontage on Victor Avenue. There is a power pole near the center of the project site with overhead connections to each building and to power poles on Victor Avenue between the eastern project site boundary and Harbor Boulevard. Land Use Designations and Zoning The Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element land use designation for the project site is Residential Low- Medium Density. The Residential Low-Medium Density designation allows for a wide range of residential uses including detached and attached single-family residences, townhomes, mobile home parks, duplexes, zero lot line homes, and patio homes. Allowable density ranges from 0-18 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) under this General Plan land use designation. The project site has a zoning designation of General Commercial (C-G), which is not consistent with the General Plan Residential Low-Medium Density land use designation. The Housing Accountability Act ([HAA] Government Code, Section 65589.5, subdivision (j)(4)) clarifies that if the zoning standards and criteria are inconsistent with applicable, objective General Plan standards but the proposed development project is consistent with the applicable objective General Plan standards for the site, then the housing development project cannot be found inconsistent with the standards and criteria of the zoning. Further, if such an inconsistency exists, the local agency may not require rezoning prior to project approval. The project proposes a residential community at a density of 17.7 du/ac and is therefore is consistent with the intent and purpose of the General Plan Residential Low-Medium Density designation. As part of the project entitlements, no zone change would be required. Project Characteristics Site Development Project implementation requires the demolition of the three existing buildings and associated surface parking lots. The proposed project would allow for the construction of 31 multi-family townhomes with attached two-car garages, site amenities, and surface guest parking. As depicted in Exhibit 2: Site Plan, the attached townhomes would in six buildings ranging from four to seven units per building. Private drive aisles would provide access to the townhomes from Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The residential development breakdown is provided in Table 2: Project Plan Summary. The proposed project would have six different floor plans, ranging from 1,002 square feet to 1,814 square feet. Each dwelling unit would have an attached two car garage and be limited to three stories in height (39 feet to parapet). No roof decks are proposed. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 4 Table 2: Project Residential Plan Summary Plan Number Unit Count Unit (sf) No. Bedrooms No. Baths Garage Space Plan 1 4 1,002 2 2.5 2 Plan 2 10 1,335 3 2.5 2 Plan 3 8 1,312 3 3 2 Plan 4A 4 1,573 3 + Den 3.5 2 Plan 4 3 1,573 4 4 2 Plan 5 2 1,814 4 4 2 Total 31 sf = square feet Source: WHA Architects, 2021. Architecture and Design Exhibit 3A-B: Conceptual Exterior Elevations, depicts the project’s proposed architectural features. The proposed project would have a modern contemporary architecture with a variety of materials including stucco, stone veneer, metal awnings, and fiber cement sidings. The color palette would include a mix of whites, greys, blues, with yellows. The first story would be painted white with stone veneer accents. The second and third stories would be painted white and contrasting greys, incorporating fiber cement siding or white with shades of grey and ochre. Townhomes with second-story decks would have contrasting metal railings. Decorative metal railings and are proposed on third story windows for façade articulation. Overall, the project architecture and design would incorporate variations in setbacks between each floor to provide façade articulation. Open Space and Landscaping According to the Anaheim Municipal Code, the RS-3 zoning requires 350 square feet of open space per residential unit. Therefore, the proposed project requires 10,850 square feet of open space. The proposed project would provide 12,941 square feet of open space (417 square feet per unit), including 11,045 square feet of common open space and 1,896 square feet of private open space, the latter as private decks and patios. See Exhibit 4: Conceptual Open Space Plan for more details. The 11,045 square feet of common space includes landscaped areas abutting the commercial center site located on the northwest corner of Harbor Boulevard at Victor Avenue, and between the townhome buildings that are not separated by a drive aisle. Additional common space would be provided in a green space with a lawn area, shade structure, and seating. A fenced, landscaped dog park is proposed at the northwest corner of the project site and is counted toward the common open space requirement. The 1,896 square feet of private open space includes 1,066 square feet in private first floor patios and 830 square feet in private decks. In total, each dwelling unit would have approximately 417 square feet of open space, which would exceed the City’s requirements for private open space. Exhibit 5: Conceptual Landscape Plan depicts the proposed landscaping plan. The project proposes a variety of tree species, shrubs, and groundcover for landscaping. Tree species include Little Gem Magnolia, Western Sycamore, Jacaranda, Southern Live Oak, Yew Pine, Brisbane Box, and Marina Strawberry Tree. The majority of new trees would be planted around the project site perimeter to provide screening and privacy from adjacent uses. Shrubs, including Agave, Aloe, French Lavender, Dessert Spoon, Bougainvillea, and Hawthorns are proposed along internal walkways and the site perimeter. Groundcover would include City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 5 Tiny Tangerine Bulbine, Kleinia, Star Jasmine, and Green Carpet Natal Plum among others. An 8-foot screen wall is proposed along the project boundary. The project requires a 25.25-foot setback dedication along the project site frontage on Harbor Boulevard for future roadway improvements. The setback area would be landscaped with Magnolia trees, groundcover, and a walkway. Access and Parking As previously noted, there are two driveways on Harbor Boulevard: one at the project site and one at the adjacent off-site commercial building site, the latter which also provides access to the project site. The project would relocate but continue to provide one driveway on Harbor Boulevard, and one driveway on Victor Avenue. Access from Harbor Boulevard would be restricted to right-in/right-out turning movements due to the presence of a center median. Access from Victor Avenue would not be restricted. No gates or controlled access are proposed as part of the project. The main L-shaped private drive aisle around the project site perimeter would be 24 feet wide. Three 24-foot-wide shared alley loaded driveways would extend from the drive aisle to the townhomes in each residential building to provide access into the attached townhome garages. All drive aisles would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers for emergency and fire vehicles. The City’s parking standard is 2.25 parking spaces for two-bedroom dwelling units, 3.0 parking spaces for three-bedroom dwelling units, and 0.5 space for every additional bedroom. The project proposes 4 two- bedroom units, 22 three-bedroom units, and 5 four-bedroom units. Table 3: Project Parking Plan identifies the number of parking spaces required by unit type pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.42. The project requires and proposes 93 parking spaces, including 62 garage spaces and 31 guest and open stalls, inclusive of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and electric vehicle (EV) spaces. Most guest parking spaces would be along the project’s northern boundary. No curbside parking along alley loaded driveways would be permitted. Table 3: Project Parking Plan Plan Number Unit Count No. Bedrooms Minimum Parking Spaces per Unit Parking Required Parking Provided Plan 1 4 2 2.25 9 9 Plan 2 10 3 3 30 66 Plan 3 8 3 3 24 Plan 4A 4 3 + Den 3 12 Plan 4 3 4 3.5 11 18 Plan 5 2 4 3.5 7 Total 93 93 Source: WHA Architects, 2021. Utilities The project site is currently served by public utilities for water, wastewater and electricity. Project implementation would continue to be served by existing service purveyors, with infrastructure improvements to serve the project. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 6 Wastewater and Water Anaheim Public Utilities and Anaheim Sanitation provide wastewater and water services, respectively to the project site. There is an existing six-inch sanitary sewer line on Victor Avenue. A proposed six-inch sanitary sewer line connection would extend from Victor Avenue toward the project site and follow the on-site L-shaped drive aisle and terminate 80 feet from the proposed Harbor Boulevard driveway. Secondary six-inch sewer lines would extend from the main sewer line into the shared alley loaded driveways, where service to each townhome would be connected. The proposed sewer infrastructure would be gravity sewer; no pumps are required. There is an existing 4-inch domestic water line for residential services on Victor Avenue and a 12-inch domestic water line in Harbor Boulevard. Project implementation would create a loop system by connecting to existing water lines via two-inch residential service lines in Victor Avenue and Harbor Boulevard. The two-inch residential connections would lead to a backflow connector at the southwest and northeast portion of the project site, before increasing to a four-inch water line. From there, the 4-inch water line would follow the internal street layout and where individual townhomes would connect. Storm Water The project’s stormwater drainage conditions would be designed to match existing conditions. Under project implementation, the storm drain system would collect runoff via surface flow toward proposed modular wetland treatment systems (MWS) at the southwest and northeast corner of the project site, before discharging into the public rights-of-way on Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. Specifically, runoff would flow from the MWS to a sump pump before discharging into new parkway drains. Electricity There are electrical lines that run through the property and on Victor Avenue. Project implementation would remove four existing overhead electrical lines and replace with two transformers, one located between residential buildings 5 and 6 and the second located north of residential building 1. The proposed project would use and expand existing electrical infrastructure to serve the project site. Solid Waste Republic Services provides solid waste collection and services to the City. No individual trash bins are proposed for the project. Rather, two common trash dumpsters would be provided along the main access road. Dumpsters would be screened and comply with the City’s requirements for trash enclosures. Discretionary and Ministerial Approvals The following discretionary and ministerial actions and/or approvals are required for the proposed project:  Subdivision Tract Map to subdivide an existing lot for 31 townhomes.  Conditional Use Permit to permit 31 townhomes with modified standards. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 7 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/COMPLIANCE (CEQA) Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), sets forth that the CEQA Guidelines establish a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and which, therefore, are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. The project is consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32: In-fill development projects) applies to projects characterized as infill development meeting the following conditions: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project’s consistency with these conditions is described below. (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan land use designation of Residential Low-Medium Density. The Residential Low-Medium Density designation allows for a wide range of residential uses including townhomes at a density of 0-18 du/ac. The project site is zoned General Commercial (C-G), which is not consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The Housing Accountability Act clarifies that if the zoning standards and criteria are inconsistent with applicable objective General Plan standards, but the proposed development project is consistent with the applicable objective General Plan standards for the site, then the housing development cannot be found inconsistent with the standards and criteria of the zoning. As part of the project entitlements, no zone change would be required. The project proposes a residential community at a density of 17.7 du/ac and is therefore consistent with the intent and purpose of the General Plan Residential Low-Medium Density designation and RM-3 zoning. Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis summarizes the project’s consistency with applicable General Plan goals and policies. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 8 Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis Goals Policies Consistency Analysis Land Use Element Goal 1.1: Preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s mosaic of unique neighborhoods. Policy 1.1.1: Actively pursue development standards and design policies to preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s many neighborhoods. Consistent. The proposed project would have a modern contemporary architecture with a variety of materials including stucco, stone veneer, metal awnings, and fiber cement sidings. The color palette would include a mix of whites, greys, blues, and yellows. The first story would be painted white with stone veneer accents. The second and third stories would be painted white with contrasting greys, incorporating fiber cement siding or white with shades of grey and ochre. Decorative metal railings are proposed on third story windows for façade articulation. The project’s design includes visually appealing finishes that promote consistency with the City’s development standards and design policies. Therefore, the project would be consistent with or otherwise would not conflict with these policies. Policy 1.1.2: Ensure that new development is designed in a manner that preserves the quality of life in existing neighborhoods. Consistent. The proposed project proposes a modern contemporary architectural design with an articulated façade and decorative accents. The project would use similar design features and architectural elements that would be consistent with other residential townhome development in the area, including the active La Palma Village development located at the northeast corner of West La Palma Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard. The project site plan clusters the townhomes toward the southeast to provide a larger separation from the existing residential uses to the west. Therefore, the project would be consistent with or otherwise would not conflict with these policies. Policy 1.1.3: Encourage future development to provide functional public spaces that foster social interaction. Consistent. The proposed project would have 13,556 square feet of open space, including 11,045 square feet of common open space. Additional common space would be provided in a green space with a lawn area, shade structure, and seating. The common open space amenities would allow for social interaction. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 9 Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis Goals Policies Consistency Analysis Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. Policy 2.1.1: Facilitate new residential development on vacant or underutilized infill parcels. Consistent. The infill residential project would add 31 housing units to the City’s housing stock. Policy 2.1.6: Ensure quality development through appropriate development standards and by adherence to related Community Design Element policies and guidelines. Consistent. The proposed project will comply with Community Design Element policies and guidelines that are set forth to ensure quality development. The Community Design Element addresses multiple-family housing compatibility through varied architectural detailing and visual interest through setbacks, entry features and façade treatment. Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses. Policy 4.1.1: Ensure that land uses develop in accordance with the Land Use Plan and Zoning Code in an effort to attain land use compatibility. Consistent. The proposed project would develop 31 townhome units and be consistent with the General Plan designated land uses. The proposed project would meet the intent and goals of the Residential Low- Medium Density land use designation. Policy 4.1.2: Require landscape and/or open space buffers to maintain a natural edge for proposed private development directly adjacent to natural, public open space areas. Consistent. The proposed project would include a landscaped buffer around the site perimeter, including a 25.25-foot landscaped setback along the project site frontage on Harbor Boulevard. The landscaped buffer would be planted with new trees, shrubs, and groundcover to provide screening and privacy from adjacent uses. Additionally, the common space would be landscaped, including the areas between the townhome buildings. Community Design Element Goal 3.1: Single-family neighborhoods are attractive, safe and comfortable. Policy 3.1.11: Encourage a variety of architectural styles, massing, floor plans, facade treatment and elevations to create visual interest. Consistent. The proposed project would have modern contemporary architecture with a variety of materials including stone, stucco veneer, metal awnings, and fiber cement sidings. The first story would be painted white with stone veneer accents. The second and third stories would be painted white and contrasting greys, incorporating fiber cement siding or white with shades of grey and ochre. The townhomes with second-story decks would have contrasting metal railings. The proposed project would incorporate variations in setbacks between each floor to provide façade articulation. Therefore, the project’s design features would create visual interest. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 10 Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis Goals Policies Consistency Analysis Goal 11.1: Architecture in Anaheim has diversity and creativity of design and is consistent with the immediate surroundings. Policy 11.1.5: Encourage energy and environmental efficiency – such as “Green Development Standards” (see Green Element) – in the design and approval of new projects. Consistent. The project would also be required adhere to CALGreen provisions, which establish planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. Public Services Goal 1.1: Provide sufficient staffing, equipment and facilities to ensure effective fire protection, emergency medical and rescue services, permitting and fire inspection, and hazardous material response services that keep pace with growth. Policy 1.1.1: Maintain adequate resources to enable the Fire Department to meet response time standards, keep pace with growth, and provide high levels of service. Consistent. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable building and fire codes and pay the appropriate impact fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance to offset any incremental demand in calls for service. Internal driveways would accommodate fire truck turning movements. Goal 5.2: Meet the community’s needs for public safety and law enforcement by ensuring adequate resources for the prevention, detection, and investigation of crime, and response to calls for service Policy 2.1.1: Maintain adequate resources to enable the Police Department to meet response time standards, keep pace with growth, and provide high levels of service. Consistent. The Police Department would review the project during the plan check process to ensure that adequate safety and security features (i.e., lighting) are included in the project. The proposed project would be required to pay development impact fees to ensure adequate police resources are available to the project. Safety Goal 1.1: Minimize the risk to public health and safety and disruptions to vital services, economic vitality, and social order resulting from seismic and geologic activities. Policy 1.1.1: Minimize the risk to life and property through the identification of potentially hazardous areas, adherence to proper construction design criteria, and provision of public information. Consistent. The project would be subject to the current California Building Code (CBC), as adopted by the City’s Planning and Building Department, with respect to seismic design parameters. Conformance with these standard engineering practices and design criteria would reduce the risk to life and property. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. Located within the City of Anaheim, the 1.75-acre project site is developed with and bordered by urban development. Land uses proximate to the site are predominately residential and commercial, and include the Palm Motor Lodge and Mobile Home Park to the north, single-family residences north of Romneya Drive, single-family residences south of Victor Avenue, Harbor Pacific Plaza commercial retail strip mall City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 11 east of Harbor Boulevard, and multi-family and single-family residences to the west along Victor Avenue and Romneya Drive. Therefore, the project would comply with this condition. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Vegetation on the project site is limited to non-native trees and groundcover along the street frontages. According to the National Wetlands Inventory and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species online databases, there are no sensitive biological resources on the project site. The project site is developed with three separate commercial buildings and has no natural features. The surrounding area is developed with urban uses. La Palma Park is east of Harbor Boulevard and the project site; vegetation is limited to non-native landscape materials. There are no open space or habitat suitable for endangered, rare, or threatened species on, adjacent, or proximate to the project site. Further, the project site lacks the resources and conditions to support special-status species, sensitive habitats, wetlands and/or waters, wildlife corridors, nurseries or rookeries, and is not within any designated or proposed Critical Habitat or Habitat Conservation Plan area. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Attachments have been provided to transmit technical memorandums and reports addressing VMT screening and trip generation (Attachment A), noise (Attachment B), air quality/greenhouse gas emissions (Attachment C), and water quality (Attachment D). The project would not have significant effects on the environment related to these topical areas. Traffic Regional vehicular access to the project site is provided via SR-91 and I-5 approximately 0.23-mile north and 1.35 miles south of the site, respectively. Local access is currently provided from Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. Trip generation estimates for the proposed project’s residential use are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). The trip generation rate for the following land use category was used for the proposed project: Multi-Family Low-Rise Land Use Code 220. Daily, and morning and evening peak hour trip generation estimates are provided in Attachment A. It is estimated that the proposed project would generate 209 daily trips, with 12 trips in the morning peak hour and 16 trips in the evening peak hour. No credit has been assumed for the existing commercial uses on the project site. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessment. Senate Bill 743 (SB 743) was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 required changes to CEQA, specifically directing the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular “level of service” (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR prepared a technical advisory (“OPR Technical Advisory”) for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and requiring that VMT replace LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. The OPR Technical Advisory suggests that cities may screen out VMT impacts using project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing to quickly identify when a project should be expected to cause a less than significant impact without conducting a detailed study. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 12 The City of Anaheim VMT guidelines provide screening criteria for projects including Type 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening, Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening, and Type 3: Project Type Screening. The proposed project would screen out from VMT under the Type 2 screening criteria. Low VMT Area Screening indicates projects within a low VMT generating area are not required to complete a VMT assessment and are presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. A low VMT generating area is based on the Orange County Transit Authority’s (OCTA) Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM). The OCTAM was used to measure VMT performance for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). The OCTAM models total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) for each TAZ in Orange County. The project site is in TAZ 284 which exceeds 15 percent below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population. Land use data for TAZ 284 was reviewed to determine whether the proposed project would be consistent with the existing land use assumptions for TAZ 284. OCTAM assumes a total buildout of 1,889 multi-family dwelling units in TAZ 284. The project proposes a 31-unit townhome development and is within the buildout assumptions of the OCTAM land uses for multi-family residential. The proposed project does not contain unique features or characteristics; therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the OCTAM buildout assumptions. Traffic Conclusion. The proposed project falls within a low VMT-generating TAZ that exceeds 15 percent below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population. This is the threshold set forth by the City for determination of CEQA VMT impacts. Since the project falls within a low VMT-generating TAZ, it is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Noise Mobile sources of noise, especially cars and trucks, are the most common and significant sources of noise in the City. Other sources of noise are the various land uses (i.e., residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational and parks activities) throughout the City that generate stationary-source noise. The existing mobile noise sources in the project area are generated by motor vehicles traveling on Harbor Avenue, Victor Avenue, and Romneya Drive. The primary sources of stationary noise in the project vicinity are those associated with the surrounding commercial and residential uses. Such noise sources include idling vehicles, music playing, mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioning equipment), dogs barking, and people talking and are typical of urban areas. The noise associated with these sources may represent a single-event noise occurrence or short-term noise. Construction Noise. Construction noise typically occurs intermittently and varies depending on the nature or phase of construction (e.g., land clearing, grading, excavation, paving). Noise generated by construction equipment, including earthmovers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. During construction, exterior noise levels could affect the sensitive receptors near the construction site. Construction activities would include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Such activities may require graders, dozers, and tractors during site preparation and grading; cranes, forklifts, generators, tractors, and welders during building construction; pavers, rollers, mixers, tractors, and paving equipment during paving; and air compressors during architectural coating. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 13 dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Noise generated by construction equipment, including earthmovers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. Typical noise levels associated with individual construction equipment are listed in Table 5: Typical Construction Noise Levels. Table 5: Typical Construction Noise Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet from Source Air Compressor 81 Backhoe 80 Compactor 82 Concrete Mixer 85 Concrete Pump 82 Concrete Vibrator 76 Crane, Mobile 83 Dozer 85 Generator 82 Grader 85 Jack Hammer 88 Loader 80 Paver 85 Pneumatic Tool 85 Pump 77 Roller 85 Saw 76 Shovel 82 Truck 84 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. Following the methodology for quantitative construction noise assessments in the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) (FTA Noise and Vibration Manual), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) was used to predict construction noise at the nearest receptors (i.e., the residential uses 24 feet to the west of the project site). Table 6: Project Construction Noise Levels shows the estimated exterior construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors. Following FTA methodology, when calculating construction noise, all equipment is assumed to operate at the center of the project because equipment would operate throughout the project site and not at a fixed location for extended periods of time. Therefore, the distances used in the RCNM model were 125 feet for the mobile homes located to the north, 176 feet for multi-family residential uses to the west, and 276 feet for single-family residential uses to the south. As shown in Table 6, the highest anticipated construction noise level of 75.8 dBA (during the demolition phase) would not exceed the FTA noise threshold of 80 dBA for residential uses. In addition, compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010 would further minimize impacts from construction noise, as construction would be City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 14 limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Therefore, project construction noise levels would not exceed FTA noise standards. Construction noise impacts would be less than significant. Although construction noise levels may exceed the existing ambient levels in the area, construction would be temporary and would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the area. Table 6: Project Construction Noise Levels Construction Phase Receptor Location Worst Case Modeled Exterior Noise Level (dBA Leq)2 Noise Threshold (dBA Leq)3 Exceeded? Land Use Direction Distance (feet)1 Demolition Residential North 125 75.8 80 No Residential West 176 72.9 80 No Residential South 276 69.0 80 No Site Preparation Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Grading Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Building Construction Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Paving Residential North 125 68.7 80 No Residential West 176 65.7 80 No Residential South 276 61.8 80 No Architectural Coating Residential North 125 68.4 80 No Residential West 176 65.4 80 No Residential South 276 61.5 80 No 1. Per the methodology described in the FTA Noise and Vibration Manual (September 2018), distances are measured from the nearest receptors to the center of the project construction site. 2. Assumes a 5 dBA reduction from intervening perimeter walls along the eastern and western property boundary. 3. The City does not have a quantitative noise threshold for construction. Therefore, the construction noise thresholds from the FTA Noise and Vibration Manual (September 2018) are conservatively used for this analysis. Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006. Refer to Attachment B for RCNM Modeling Results for noise modeling results. Operational Noise. The project site is currently developed and occupied by several commercial uses, which generate noise. Project implementation would create new sources of noise in the project area. The primary noise sources associated with the project that could potentially impact nearby sensitive uses include mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioners, etc.), typical stationary noise from residential uses (e.g., dogs barking, use of landscape equipment, people talking, etc.), and off-site traffic noise. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 15 Mechanical Equipment Mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] equipment) typically generates noise levels of approximately 52 dBA at 50 feet.1 Sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.2 The nearest sensitive receptors (multi-family residences to the west) would be located as close as 30 feet from the HVAC equipment at the project site. At this distance, mechanical equipment noise levels would be approximately 56.4 dBA and would not exceed the City’s 60 dBA exterior noise standard set forth in Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010 and/or the 65 dBA noise standard for residential uses in the Anaheim General Plan. Therefore, impacts from mechanical equipment would be less than significant. Residential Stationary Noise The project would also result in stationary noise that is typical of residential uses/neighborhoods, including the use of landscaping equipment, dogs barking, music playing, people talking, etc. These noise sources can generate noise levels between up to 65 dBA at a distance of 50 feet.3 However, noise events from these stationary sources are generally sporadic, short in duration, and would not last for extended periods of time. In addition, stationary noise is generated by residences to the north, south, and west, and by the existing on-site commercial uses under existing conditions. Therefore, stationary noise levels from the project would not result in a noticeable increase in ambient noise levels. Further, the project would comply with the noise standards set forth in Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010. Impacts would be less than significant impact. Mobile Traffic Noise Project implementation would result in an increase of traffic trips to project area roadways. According to the 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard Traffic Impact Analysis Summary of (TJW Engineering Inc., December 2021) (Traffic Impact Analysis), the project would generate 209 daily trips, with 12 morning peak hour trips and 16 evening. peak hour trips. In general, a 3-dBA increase in traffic noise is barely perceptible to people, while a 5-dBA increase is readily noticeable. Traffic volumes on project area roadways would have to approximately double for the resulting traffic noise levels to generate a barely perceptible 3-dBA increase.4 Harbor Boulevard has approximately 34,900 ADT5. The proposed project would result in approximately 209 net daily trips, which is not enough to double the existing traffic volumes on Harbor Boulevard or Victor Avenue (the primary access roadways to the project site). Therefore, the proposed project would not generate enough traffic to result in a noticeable 3-dBA increase in ambient noise levels. Impacts would be less than significant. Vibration Impacts. Increases in ground-borne vibration levels attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with short-term construction-related activities. Project site construction would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary ground-borne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. 1 Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel1, and Cynthia A. Kladden, Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. 2 Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 3 Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel1, and Cynthia A. Kladden, Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. 4 According to the California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), it takes a doubling of traffic to create a noticeable (i.e., 3 dBA) noise increase. 5 According to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Department, Daily Traffic Counts – Average Daily Traffic Volume Map, Romneya Drive has 8,200 ADT and North Harbor Boulevard has 34,900 ADT. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 16 The FTA has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations. In general, the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations (i.e., 0.2 in/sec) appears to be conservative. The types of construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. For example, for a building that is constructed with reinforced concrete with no plaster, the FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.20 in/sec is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. This analysis uses the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations at non-engineered timber and masonry buildings of 0.2 inch-per-second peak particle velocity (PPV) and human annoyance criterion of 0.4 inch-per-second PPV in accordance with Caltrans guidance 6 to evaluate potential construction vibration impacts. Table 7: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, lists vibration levels at 25 feet for typical construction equipment. The nearest off-site building/structure is the commercial retail use to remain at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard at Victor Avenue located 25 feet southeast, and the multifamily residences located approximately 30 feet to the west of project construction activities. Groundborne vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. As indicated in the table, based on FTA data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operations that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet from the source of activity. Table 7: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Equipment Peak Particle Velocity at 25 Feet (in/sec) Peak Particle Velocity at 30 Feet (in/sec) Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.068 Caisson Drilling 0.089 0.068 Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.058 Rock Breaker 0.059 0.045 Jackhammer 0.035 0.027 Small Bulldozer/Tractors 0.003 0.002 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018. As shown in Table 7, at 25 feet, the vibration velocities from construction equipment would reach approximately 0.089 in/sec PPV, which is below the FTA’s 0.20 in/sec PPV threshold for building damage and Caltrans’ 0.4 in/sec PPV threshold for human annoyance. Further, construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the nearest off-site structures. Concentration of construction activities would occur at least 25 feet from the receptor. Some construction activity may occur right at the property line adjacent to mobile homes, but would be infrequent and short in duration. Once operational, the proposed project would not include vibration- 6 California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Table 20, September 2013. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 17 generating uses or operations. Therefore, vibration impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. Noise Conclusion. Project implementation would result in less than significant short-term and long-term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Air Quality Construction Emissions. Construction associated with the proposed project would generate short-term emissions of criteria air pollutants. The criteria pollutants of primary concern within the project area include ozone precursor pollutants (i.e., Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Nitrous Oxide (NOx), Particulate Matter 10 (PM10), and PM2.5). Construction-generated emissions are short term and of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Construction results in the temporary generation of emissions resulting from site grading, road paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, and the movement of construction equipment, especially on unpaved surfaces. Emissions of airborne particulate matter are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities as well as weather conditions and the appropriate application of water. The duration of construction activities for the project is estimated to be approximately 15 months, beginning in September 2022 and finishing in November 2023. The project would construct 31 townhomes with private drive aisles, common open space, and parking spaces. Construction- generated emissions associated the proposed project were calculated using the CARB-approved California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), which is designed to model emissions for land use development projects, based on typical construction requirements. See Attachment C: Air Quality and GHG Data for more information regarding the construction assumptions used in this analysis. Predicted maximum daily construction-generated emissions for the proposed project are identified in Table 8: Project Construction Emissions. Table 8: Project Construction Emissions Construction Year Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 2022 1.82 20.39 15.38 0.04 3.98 2.21 2023 36.18 12.18 13.69 0.03 0.92 0.61 Maximum Emissions 36.18 20.39 15.38 0.04 3.98 2.21 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No 1. SCAQMD Rule 403 Fugitive Dust applied. The Rule 403 reduction/credits include the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Reductions percentages from the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook (Tables XI-A through XI-E) were applied. No mitigation was applied to construction equipment. Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment C for model outputs. Table 8 shows that construction pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds. While impacts would be considered less than significant, the proposed project would also be subject to City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 18 SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, and 1113, which prohibit nuisances, require dust control measures, and limit VOC content in paints, respectively. Compliance with the standards SCAQMD rules would further reduce specific construction-related emissions. As shown above, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds and impacts would be less than significant. Operational Emissions. Operational emissions are typically associated with mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicle use) and area sources (such as the use of landscape maintenance equipment, hearths, consumer products, and architectural coatings). Energy source emissions would be generated from electricity and natural gas (non-hearth) usage. Table 9: Project Operational Emissions summarizes the operational emissions attributable to the proposed project. As shown in the table, the project’s emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, regional operational emissions would result in a less than significant long-term regional air quality impact. Table 9: Project Operational Emissions Source Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 1.35 <1 2.76 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile <1 <1 5.92 <1 1.51 <1 Total 1.95 1.33 8.77 <1 1.58 <1 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No 1. Emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0, as recommended by the SCAQMD. Worst-case seasonal maximum daily emissions are reported. Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment C for model outputs. Localized Construction Impacts. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project are a mobile home park located adjacent to the north, single-family residences located approximately 63 feet to the south of the project site, and multi-family residences located approximately 30 feet to the west of the project site. To identify impacts to sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD recommends addressing Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) for construction. Because CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily soil disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment, Table 10: Equipment- Specific Grading Rates is used to determine the maximum daily disturbed acreage for comparison to LSTs. The proposed project is located in source receptor area - Central Orange County (SRA 17). LSTs apply to NOX, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects that disturb areas less than or equal to five acres in size. Based on the daily equipment modeled in CalEEMod, project construction is anticipated to disturb approximately two acres in a single day. As such, the LSTs for a maximum daily disturbance of two acres were used in this analysis. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 19 Table 10: Equipment-Specific Grading Rates Construction Phase Equipment Type Equipment Quantity Acres Graded per 8-Hour Day Operating Hours per Day Acres Graded per Day Grading Crawler Tractor 2 0.5 8 1 Graders 1 0.5 8 0.5 Rubber-Tired Dozers 1 0.5 8 0.5 Scrapers 0 1.0 0 0 Total Acres Graded per Day 2 Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. SCAQMD’s methodology indicates that “off-site mobile emissions from the project should not be included in the emissions compared to LSTs.” Therefore, for purposes of the construction LST analysis, only emissions included in the CalEEMod “on-site” emissions outputs were considered. The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is the multi-family residences located 30 feet (9.1 meters) to the west of the project site. LST thresholds are provided for distances to sensitive receptors of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. Therefore, as recommended by the SCAQMD, LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters were used in this analysis for receptors closer than 25 meters. Table 11: Localized Significance of Emissions, presents the results of localized emissions during construction activity. Emissions of these pollutants on the peak day of construction would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during construction activities. Table 11: Localized Significance of Emissions Source/Activity Emissions (pounds per day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction Emissions Demolition 2022 16.62 13.96 2.98 1.11 Site Preparation 2022 14.63 7.09 3.30 1.86 Grading 2022 16.9 9.22 3.77 2.15 Building Construction 2022 12.50 12.73 0.59 0.57 Building Construction 2023 11.71 12.61 0.51 0.50 Paving 2023 6.24 8.80 0.31 0.28 Architectural Coating 2023 1.30 1.81 0.07 0.07 Maximum Daily Emissions 16.62 13.96 3.77 2.15 SCAQMD Localized Screening Threshold (2 acres of disturbance at 25 meters) 115 715 6 4 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold? No No No No Operational Emissions On-Site Emissions (Area + Energy Sources) 0.16 1.42 0.28 0.08 SCAQMD Localized Screening Threshold (2 acres of disturbance at 25 meters) 115 715 2 1 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold? No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment C for model data outputs. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 20 Localized Operational Impacts. According to the SCAQMD localized significance threshold methodology, LSTs apply to on-site sources. LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters for SRA 17 were conservatively used in this analysis. The 2-acre LST threshold was used for 1.75-acre project site. The operational emissions shown in Table 11 include all on-site project-related stationary sources (i.e., area and energy sources). The maximum daily emissions of these pollutants during operations would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during operational activities. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots. An analysis of CO “hot spots” is needed to determine whether the change in the level of service (LOS) of an intersection from the proposed project would have the potential to result in exceedances of the CAAQS or NAAQS. It has long been recognized that CO exceedances are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when vehicles are idling at intersections. Vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last 20 years. Currently, the CO standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams per mile for passenger cars (requirements for certain vehicles are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations have steadily declined. Accordingly, with the steadily decreasing CO emissions from vehicles, even very busy intersections do not result in exceedances of the CO standard. An analysis prepared for CO attainment in the South Coast Air Basin by the SCAQMD can assist in evaluating the potential for CO exceedances. CO attainment was thoroughly analyzed as part of the SCAQMD’s 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. The Basin was re-designated as attainment in 2007 and is no longer addressed in the SCAQMD’s AQMP. The 2003 Air Quality Management Plan is the most recent AQMP that addresses CO concentrations. As part of the SCAQMD CO Hot Spot analysis, the Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue intersection, one of the most congested intersections in Southern California with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day, was modeled for CO concentrations. This modeling effort identified a CO concentration high of 4.6 parts per million (ppm), which is well below the 35 ppm federal standard. The proposed project considered herein would not produce the volume of traffic required to generate a CO hot spot in the context of SCAQMD’s 2003 CO hot spot analysis. As the CO hot spots were not experienced at the Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue intersection even as it accommodates 100,000 vehicles daily, it can be reasonably inferred that CO hot spots would not be experienced at any vicinity intersections as the project would generate 209 daily vehicle trips. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Air Quality Conclusion. Project implementation would not have significant short-term or long-term air quality impacts. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project would include direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from project construction and operations. Construction is considered a direct source since these emissions occur at the site. Direct operational-related GHG emissions for the proposed project would include emissions from area and mobile sources, while indirect emissions are from energy consumption, water demand, and solid waste. Construction GHG Emissions. Project construction would result in direct emissions of CO2, N2O, and CH4 from construction equipment and the transport of materials and construction workers to and from the City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 21 project site. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of the project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.7 Total GHG emissions generated during all phases of construction were combined and are presented in Table 12: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The CalEEMod outputs are contained within Attachment C. As shown in the table, the project construction would result in 260 MTCO2e (approximately 8.67 MTCO2e/year when amortized over 30 years). Table 12: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction MTCO2e per Year Total Construction 260 Amortized over 30 Years 8.67 Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment C for model data outputs. Operational GHG Emissions. Operational or long-term emissions occur over the life of the proposed project. GHG emissions would result from direct emissions such as project generated vehicular traffic, on- site combustion of natural gas, operation of any landscaping equipment. Operational GHG emissions would also result from indirect sources, such as off-site generation of electrical power over the life of the project, the energy required to convey water to, and wastewater from the project site, the emissions associated with solid waste generated from the project site, and any fugitive refrigerants from air conditioning or refrigerators. Table 13: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions summarizes the total GHG emissions associated with proposed project. As shown, the project would generate approximately 260 MTCO2e/year. The project would not result in an increase in GHG emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Therefore, project-related GHG emissions would be less than significant. Table 13: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions Source MTCO2e per Year Construction Amortized over 30 Years 8.67 Area Source 7.28 Energy 107.00 Mobile 237.15 Waste 9.18 Water 8.87 Total Project Emissions 378.16 SCAQMD Project Threshold 3,000 Threshold Exceeded? No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment C for model data outputs. Greenhouse Gas Conclusion. Project implementation would result in less than significant construction and operational air quality and GHG impacts. No mitigation measures would be required. Therefore, the 7 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13, August 26, 2009). City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 22 proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Water Quality Under existing conditions, runoff surface flows in an easterly direction toward Harbor Boulevard and southerly direction toward Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Harbor Boulevard flows south and then west on Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Victor Avenue flows west through catch basins and into the Carbon Creek Channel at La Palma Avenue. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at Anaheim Bay. Construction and demolition activities subject to the Construction General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) include but not limited to clearing, grading, grubbing, or excavation, or any other activity that results in a land disturbance equal to or greater than one acre. The project would disturb approximately 1.75 gross acres; therefore, the project would be subject to the Construction General Permit. To obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, the applicant is required to file, with the State Water Board, Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), which include a Notice of Intent (NOI) and other compliance-related documents. The Construction General Permit requires development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and monitoring plan, which must include erosion-control and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would meet or exceed measures required by the Construction General Permit to control potential construction-related pollutants. Erosion-control BMPs prevent erosion, whereas sediment controls trap sediment once it has been mobilized. The types of required BMPs are relative to the amount of soil disturbed, the types of pollutants used or stored at the project site, and proximity to water bodies. Additionally, the project would be subject to compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 10.09.070, which requires compliance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and any conditions and requirements established by the City in order to meet federal and State water quality requirements related to stormwater runoff. The DAMP reduces the pollution content of stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). The purpose of the Orange County DAMP is to satisfy NPDES permit conditions for creating and implementing a Storm Water Management Plan to reduce pollutant discharges to the MEP. The DAMP contains guidelines on structural and nonstructural BMPs for meeting the NPDES goals. BMPs include erosion controls, sediment controls, wind erosion controls, tracking controls, non-storm water management, and waste and materials management. Following compliance with NPDES and Anaheim Municipal Code requirements, which include implementation of BMPs, the project’s construction-related activities would not violate any water quality standards or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. The applicant has submitted the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan on December 13, 2021. Once the applicant receives approval of the proposed project, the applicant will submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan at a future date. Project compliance with existing codes and regulations would result in less than significant impacts to water quality. Water Quality Conclusion. Project implementation would not result in significant water quality impacts. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 23 (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Project implementation would require the construction of new on-site utility infrastructure to serve the residences and associated project amenities. The project would connect the proposed utilities to existing off-site utility infrastructure, with the final sizing and design of on-site facilities occurring during final building design and plan check. Water and Sewer Anaheim Public Utilities provides for water and wastewater services to the project site. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) treats the wastewater collected within City. According to the Anaheim 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, water use per capita per day was 107 gallons.8 The California Department of Finance estimates the average persons per household in the City at approximately 3.31 persons per household.9 Therefore, the proposed project would generate approximately 103 new residents to the City. Water demand associated with the project is estimated at 12.35 acre-feet (AF) per year.10 This is a conservative assumption because it does not account for existing water use at the project site. The City estimates water supply sources over a 25-year period, from 2020-2045. The City’s water supply is projected to be approximately 66,337 AF by 2045. The project’s water demand would be less than one percent of expected total demand in 2045. Sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the project. A project-specific sewer study was prepared for the project. As noted in the Project Description, the project site is currently occupied by three separate commercial buildings totaling 13,480 square feet with surface parking within the La Palma Park Plaza. Estimated sewer demand from existing commercial uses is 8,118 gallons per day. The proposed residential use would generate a sewer demand of 18,600 gallons per day, a net increase of 10,482 gallons per day. Sewer flows would be treated at OCSD facilities, specifically Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 located in the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, respectively. Plant No. 1 treats an average of 117 million gallons of sewage per day and Plant No.2 treats an average of 67 million gallons of sewage per day. The net increase in sewer generation from the proposed project would represent a nominal increase in the average daily treated flows at OCSD facilities. The existing wastewater collection facilities have adequate capacity to serve the wastewater generated by the project. Solid Waste Republic Services, a private recycling and non-hazardous solid waste hauler, provides solid waste services to the City. Republic Services is responsible for all residential, commercial, and industrial waste and recycling services. Solid waste is disposed of in Orange County landfills. Currently, there are three active landfills in the County: Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, Olinda Alpha Landfill in Brea, and Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. Table 14: Orange County Landfill Capacities provides capacity details for each of the County landfills. 8 Psomas, City of Anaheim 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Available at: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=, Accessed February 27, 2022. 9 California Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates, Available at: https://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/e-5/, Accessed February 267, 2022. 10 3.31 persons per household * 31 townhomes = 103 new residents. 103*107 gallons per day*365 days = 4,022,665 gallons per year, or 12.35 AFY. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 24 Table 14: Orange County Landfill Capacities Landfill Maximum Daily Permitted Tonnage (tons per day) Maximum Permitted Capacity (Cubic Feet) Remaining Capacity Frank R. Bowerman 11,500 266,000,000 205,000,000 Olinda Alpha 8,000 148,800,000 34,200,000 Prima Deshecha 4,000 172,900,000 134,300,000 Source: CalRecycle. Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), 2022. Based on a generation rate of 12.23 pounds (lbs)/household/day for residential uses, the project would generate approximately 379 pounds per day of solid waste.11 This is a conservative assumption because it does not account for waste generation and disposal associated with the existing on-site land uses. The project’s projected solid waste generation would account for less than one percent of the overall daily capacity of the County landfills. The proposed project would include recycling programs to reduce the amount of solid waste produced on the project site. Existing landfills have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project and solid waste generated during construction and operations would represent a nominal increase compared to the daily permitted tonnage at landfills. Compliance with all applicable regulations and laws regarding solid waste would further disposal in landfills. Telecommunications The project site is located in a built-out, urban setting. Various telecom service providers serve the site and the surrounding properties. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades required to serve the project. Electricity Anaheim Public Utilities provides electric power to the City. The proposed project’s electricity demand would be approximately 377,181 kWh/year (see Attachment C for model outputs).12 The project site is in an urbanized area and connected to existing electricity infrastructure. The proposed project would underground some existing power poles on the project site. The project would not substantially increase service demand for electricity through substantial unplanned population growth and existing systems and supplies would be sufficient to support project residents. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) provides natural gas to the City. The proposed project’s natural gas demand would be approximately 740,830 KBtu/year (see Attachment C for model outputs).13 The project site is in an urbanized area and connected to existing natural gas infrastructure; no off-site infrastructure improvements would be required. The project would not substantially increase service 11 CalRecyle. 2006. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates: Residential Sector Generation Rates. Available at https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. Accessed February 17, 2022. 12 Project electrical demand does not take credit for existing commercial land uses. 13 Ibid. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 25 demand for natural gas through substantial unplanned population growth and existing systems and supplies would be sufficient to support project residents. Fire Services The City of Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department provides fire protection services throughout the City, inclusive to the existing development on the project site. The Fire and Rescue Department operates 12 fire stations and employs 209 sworn fire personnel.14 The proposed project would incrementally increase demands for fire protection services associated with service calls, inspections, etc. However, the demand for fire protection services would be minimal and met with existing fire resources. Additionally, the project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The City provides for additional fire personnel and associated facilities through its annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program review process. Annually, Fire Department needs would be assessed, and budget allocations revised accordingly to ensure that adequate levels of service are maintained throughout the City. The proposed project would contribute to the funding of fire services over an extended period, through an increase in tax revenue relative to the project site’s increase in development intensity. Additionally, building plans submitted for new development on the project site would be required to comply with fire safety requirements. Police Services The Anaheim Police Department provides police protection and law enforcement services throughout the City, including to the existing development on the project site. The Police Department provides emergency police response, nonemergency police response, routine police patrol, traffic violation enforcement, traffic accident investigation, animal control, and parking code enforcement. The Police Department headquarters are located at 425 South Harbor Boulevard, approximately 1.4 miles south of the project site. The Police Department operates 4 police stations and employs more than 400 sworn police personnel.15 The forecast population growth and increased demand for services as a result of project implementation would not exceed General Plan population projections and anticipated public service needs. The Police Department would review the proposed project during the plan check process to ensure that adequate lighting, safety and security features are included in the proposed project design. The project does not propose, and would not create a need for, new/physically altered police protection facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios/response times. Schools The project site is within the Anaheim Elementary School District and Anaheim Unified High School District boundaries. The project would construct 31 townhomes, which would increase the student population and demand for school services. However, the project would be subject to payment of school impact fees in accordance with Senate Bill 50. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65995(h), “The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed …are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization …on the provision of adequate school facilities.” The applicant would pay developer fees 14 City of Anaheim. 2021. Anaheim Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Adopted Budget. Available at https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/32083/20-21-Proposed-Budget-Book, Accessed February 18, 2022. 15 Anaheim Police Department. (2021). Command Staff. Available at: http://www.anaheim.net/172/Command-Staff, Accessed February 18, 2022. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 26 in compliance with the established regulatory framework to support provision of adequate school services. Therefore, the project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with such facilities. Parks As described in the Project Description, the proposed project would require 350 square feet of open space per residential unit. The proposed project would provide 12,941 square feet of open space (417 square feet per unit), including 11,045 square feet of common open space and 1,896 square feet of private open space, the latter as private decks and patios. The project’s open space and recreational facilities would provide recreational opportunities to future residents rather than relying solely on the City’s existing public park system. The forecasted population growth for the proposed project of 103 persons would have a nominal impact on the demand of recreational facilities. Further, the project is a residential development and therefore would be subject to Park Impact Fees as required by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 17.34.010. The project does not propose, and would not require construction or expansion of public recreational facilities. Therefore, the project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with such facilities. Utility and Public Services Conclusion. Project implementation would not result in any significant impacts to utilities or public services. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Exceptions to Exemptions Even if a project may be exempt under any of the potential categorical exemptions, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides specific instances where exceptions to otherwise applicable exemptions apply. The following text addresses each exception as it relates to the proposed City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project. A. Location. The exception states, “Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. A project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.” This exception applies only to CEQA exemptions under Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11. The project is pursuing an exemption under Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects; therefore, this exception is not applicable. Furthermore, the project is in an urbanized area and is developed, with no natural features. B. Cumulative Impact. This exception states, “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, is significant.” The proposed project is limited to the demolition of three existing commercial buildings and associated parking lots and construction of 31 multi-family townhomes. The project is not part of a larger phased development that would result in successive projects; therefore, the project City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 27 would not result in cumulative impacts from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. C. Significant Impact. The exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” As described above, the proposed project would involve the demolition of three existing commercial buildings and associated surface parking areas to develop 31 multi-family townhomes, common landscaped areas, a dog park, and two access driveways on Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The proposed project is a residential infill development. There are no activities associated with the project that would cause a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. D. Scenic Highways. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.” The California Department of Transportation State Scenic Highway System Map depicts locations and status of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways. According to the map, the proposed project is not located on or near an officially designated scenic highway.16 The nearest designated scenic highway is the Riverside Freeway (CA-91) located 5.5 miles east of the project site. Therefore, the project would have no impacts on an officially designated scenic highway. E. Hazardous Waste Sites. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Government Code Section 65962.5 refers specifically to a list of hazardous waste facilities compiled by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The project site is not included on the DTSC Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List.17 Therefore, the project site is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Further, no listed cases exist within the project vicinity. Therefore, no impacts would occur. F. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project is not identified in the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources and is not within the City of Anaheim’s four historic districts. A portion of the project located at 523 West Victor Avenue is listed on the City of Anaheim Structures of Historical Interest List. Kimley-Horn performed site reconnaissance and did not identify any structures associated with the address. City documents confirmed that the 523 West Victor Avenue local listing is no longer a valid listing. A residential structure previously at that address was demolished 16 California Department of Transportation. (20118). California State Scenic Highway System Map, Available at: https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa, Accessed January 26, 2022. 17 Department of Toxic Substances Control. (2022). Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List, Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/search?cmd=search&reporttype=CORTESE&site_type=CSITES,FUDS&status=ACT,BKLG,COM&re porttitle=HAZARDOUS+WASTE+AND+SUBSTANCES+SITE+LIST+%28CORTESE%29, Accessed January 26, 2022. City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project CEQA Categorical Exemption WORKING DRAFT-NOT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW 28 in 2016. 523 West Victor Avenue is now a paved parking lot and no longer considered under a historic classification. No impacts to historical resources would occur. 523 West Victor Avenue (2008) 523 West Victor Avenue (2021) DETERMINATION I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following each question and that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as infill development meeting the conditions of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date Printed Name, Title Phone Number March 14, 2022 Andy Uk, Associate Planner 714-765-5238 EXHIBIT 1: Vicinity Map City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project Project SiteProject Site West Victor AvenueWest Victor Avenue West Romneya DriveWest Romneya Drive North Harbor BoulevardNorth Harbor BoulevardLa P a l m a P a r k w a y La P a l m a P a r k w a y La Palma ParkLa Palma Park West Julianna StreetWest Julianna Street EXHIBIT 2: Site Plan City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project EXHIBIT 3A: Conceptual Exterior Elevations City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project EXHIBIT 3B: Conceptual Exterior Elevations City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project EXHIBIT 4: Conceptual Open Space Plan City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project EXHIBIT 5: Conceptual Landscape Plan City Ventures Harbor Townhomes Project Attachment A VMT Screening and Trip Generation Analysis Memorandum 9841 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 200 | Irvine, California 92618 | t: (949) 878-3509 www.tjwengineering.com December 7, 2021 Ms. Kim Prijatel CITY VENTURES 3121 Michaelson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard Trip Generation Analysis, City of Anaheim Dear Ms. Prijatel, TJW Engineering, Inc. (TJW) is pleased to submit this Trip Generation Analysis for the proposed project located at 1075-1085 N. Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project includes 31 multifamily residential dwelling units. A site plan is attached for reference. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the project Trip Generation Analysis. Proposed Project The proposed site is located at 1075-1085 N. Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The project will construct 31 multifamily residential dwelling units. Site access will be provided along Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The project is also located on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Highway System. Trip Generation Analysis Projected trip generation for the proposed project was developed based on the most recent City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. The guidelines state land uses that generate less than 100 peak hour trips will not require a TIA that includes LOS analysis. In addition, projects on the CMP Highway System generating less than 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) and projects that will add 50 or fewer peak hour trips to any CMP monitored intersection will not require a TIA. The trip generation for the proposed project was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (11 th Edition). Based on the proposed project’s intended use the projected trip generation was determined using the Multi-Family Low-Rise Land Use Code 220. It should be noted, trip credits were not applied for existing land uses when developing the trip generation for the proposed project; this was done to provide a conservative analysis. The proposed project is projected to generate 12 total AM peak hour trips, 16 total PM peak hour trips, and 209 total daily trips. Ms. Prijatel 1075-1085 N Harbor Trip Gen/VMT Analysis December 7, 2021 Page 2 TJW Engineering, Inc. CVR21003 1075-1085 N Harbor Trip Gen Memo 12072021.docx Table 1 – Trip Generation Proposed Land Use Qty Unit Daily Trips (ADTs) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In:Out Split Trips Rate In:Out Split Trips In Out Total In Out Total Multi-Family Low-Rise (221) 31 DU 6.74 209 0.40 24:76 3 9 12 0.51 63:37 10 6 16 Total 209 3 9 12 10 6 16 Notes: ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition, 2021); DU=Dwelling Unit Summary This memorandum provides an overview of the trip generation analysis for the proposed project. Based on the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020), the proposed project generates less than 100 peak hour trips and does not require a TIA that includes LOS analysis. In addition, as the project is also located on the CMP highway system and does not exceed 1,600 ADT or 50 peak hour trips it does not require a TIA that includes LOS analysis. Please contact us at (949) 878-3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE David Chew, PTP President Transportation Planner Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 5.0' 24.0' 25.5' 24.0'5.0' 5.0' 18.8' R10.0' 27.0' 24.0' Existing C-G - General Commercial: Mobile Home Lot Existing C-G - General Commercial: 1-Story Motel Existing RM-4 - 2-Story Condos Existing RM-3 - 1-Story SFD Existing C-G - General Commercial: Strip Mall 12 3 5 4 6 Victor Ave Harbor Blvd155.1' Romneya Dr 18.8' 65.2' 124.3' 122.0' 220.5' 119.6' 461.6' 2.4' EV 24.0' 27.8' 45.3' 75.7' 15.1' 10.0' 20.3' 8.8' 8.0' 10.0' 7.4'7.5' 24.0' 15.0'10.0' 5.0' 24.0' 24.1' 18.7' 5.0' 15.1' 20.0' 321.5' Amenity area including: - bocce ball - seating Notes: 1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only. 2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance. 3. Base information per civil engineer. 4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information 5. Building Footprints might change due to the final design elevation style. 6. Open space area is subject to change due to the balcony design of the elevation. 7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. | 2021022 | 04-05-21C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ANAHEIM B ANAHEIM, CA CONCEPT STUDY Project Summary Total Site Area:+ 1.75 Acres Total Units:31 Homes ▪(4) Plan 1: + 1,100 SF, 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath ▪(4) Plan 2a: + 1,329 SF, 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath, Loft ▪(6) Plan 2b: + 1,329 SF, 3 Bed, 2.5 Bath ▪(8) Plan 3: + 1,417 SF, 3 Bed, 3 Bath ▪(7) Plan 4: + 1,670 SF, 4 Bed, 4 Bath ▪(2) Plan 5: + 2,000 SF, 4 Bed, 4 Bath Density:17.7 Homes per Acre Parking: Required: 104 Spaces (3.06 spaces per home) ▪(8) 2 Bedroom x 2.25 Spaces = 18 Spaces ▪(14) 3 Bedroom x 3.0 Spaces = 42 Spaces ▪(9) 4 Bedroom x 3.5 Spaces = 31.5 Spaces Provided: 104 Spaces (3.06 spaces per home) ▪Garage: 68 Spaces ▪Head In: 25 Spaces (8.5' x 18') ▪ADA: 2 Spaces (9' x 18') ▪Parallel: 3 Spaces (8' x 22') ▪Future EV:1 Spaces (9' x 18') Open Space: Required: 10,850 SF Total (350 per home) ▪Common: xx SF (10' min. dim.) ▪Private: xx SF (10' min. dim. ground; 7' min. dim. deck) Provided: 11,986 SF Total (386 SF per home) ▪Common: 11,985 SF (10' Min. Dimension) ▪Private: xx SF (10' Min. Dimension) Lot Coverage:xx SF (xx% of site) Trash enclosure and bulky item pick up area Road acts as buffer and setback to existing residential Secondary trash enclosure Transformer location Secondary transformer 9841 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 200 | Irvine, California 92618 | t: (949) 878-3509 www.tjwengineering.com December 7, 2021 Ms. Kim Prijatel CITY VENTURES 3121 Michaelson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard VMT Screening, City of Anaheim Dear Ms. Prijatel, TJW Engineering, Inc. (TJW) is pleased to submit this VMT Screening for the proposed project located at 1075-1085 N. Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project includes 31 multifamily residential dwelling units. A site plan is attached for reference. The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the project VMT Screening. Proposed Project The proposed site is located at 1075-1085 N. Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The project will construct 31 multifamily residential dwelling units. Site access will be provided along Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. The project is also located on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Highway System. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Senate Bill (SB) 743 was adopted in 2013 requiring the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to identify new metrics for identifying and mitigating transportation impacts within the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For land use projects, OPR has identified Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the new metric for transportation analysis under CEQA. The regulatory changes to the CEQA guidelines that implement SB 743 were approved on December 28th, 2018 with an implementation date of July 1st, 2020 as the new metric. As the project falls within the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim, the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) was consulted. The document outlines guidelines for CEQA analysis including screening criteria and requirements for VMT assessment of land use projects. The VMT guidelines provide several screening criteria for projects including Type 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening, Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening, and Type 3: Project Type Screening. Ms. Prijatel 1075-1085 N Harbor Trip Gen/VMT Analysis December 7, 2021 Page 2 TJW Engineering, Inc. CVR21003 1075-1085 N Harbor VMT Memo 12072021.docx The City’s Guidelines for Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening indicates projects within a low VMT generating area are not required to complete a VMT assessment and are presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. A low VMT generating area is based on the Orange County Transit Authority’s (OCTA) Orange County Traffic Analysis Model (OCTAM). The OCTAM was used to measure VMT performance for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) was estimated for each TAZ in Orange County. The City’s Guidelines provides a map of low VMT-generating zones within Anaheim as compared to the County; see attached map for reference. Based on the OCTAM TAZ structure, the project falls within TAZ 284 which exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population. To ensure that the proposed project is consistent with the existing land uses within the OCTAM TAZ, a review of the land use data for TAZ 284 was conducted. The existing (2016) land uses assumed in the OCTAM includes a total of 1,889 multi-family dwelling units; a more detailed list of the land uses and socioeconomic data for TAZ 284 is attached for reference. As the proposed project is consistent with the OCTAM land uses of multi-family dwelling units and there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be mis-represented by the OCTAM data, it is reasonable to assume the proposed project could be represented by the OCTAM data. The proposed project falls within a low VMT-generating TAZ that exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population. This is the threshold set forth by the City for determination of CEQA VMT impacts. As the project falls within a low VMT-generating TAZ, it is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT. Summary This memorandum provides an overview of the VMT screening for the proposed project. Based on the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020), projects located within a low VMT-generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT and be screened from VMT analysis. As the proposed project falls within a low VMT-generating TAZ, and consistent with the City guidelines, the proposed project does not require additional traffic or VMT analysis. Ms. Prijatel 1075-1085 N Harbor Trip Gen/VMT Analysis December 7, 2021 Page 3 TJW Engineering, Inc. CVR21003 1075-1085 N Harbor VMT Memo 12072021.docx Please contact us at (949) 878-3509 if you have any questions regarding this analysis. Sincerely, Thomas Wheat, PE, TE David Chew, PTP President Transportation Planner Registered Civil Engineer #69467 Registered Traffic Engineer #2565 5.0' 24.0' 25.5' 24.0'5.0' 5.0' 18.8' R10.0' 27.0' 24.0' Existing C-G - General Commercial: Mobile Home Lot Existing C-G - General Commercial: 1-Story Motel Existing RM-4 - 2-Story Condos Existing RM-3 - 1-Story SFD Existing C-G - General Commercial: Strip Mall 12 3 5 4 6 Victor Ave Harbor Blvd155.1' Romneya Dr 18.8' 65.2' 124.3' 122.0' 220.5' 119.6' 461.6' 2.4' EV 24.0' 27.8' 45.3' 75.7' 15.1' 10.0' 20.3' 8.8' 8.0' 10.0' 7.4'7.5' 24.0' 15.0'10.0' 5.0' 24.0' 24.1' 18.7' 5.0' 15.1' 20.0' 321.5' Amenity area including: - bocce ball - seating Notes: 1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only. 2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance. 3. Base information per civil engineer. 4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information 5. Building Footprints might change due to the final design elevation style. 6. Open space area is subject to change due to the balcony design of the elevation. 7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. | 2021022 | 04-05-21C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ANAHEIM B ANAHEIM, CA CONCEPT STUDY Project Summary Total Site Area:+ 1.75 Acres Total Units:31 Homes ▪(4) Plan 1: + 1,100 SF, 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath ▪(4) Plan 2a: + 1,329 SF, 2 Bed, 2.5 Bath, Loft ▪(6) Plan 2b: + 1,329 SF, 3 Bed, 2.5 Bath ▪(8) Plan 3: + 1,417 SF, 3 Bed, 3 Bath ▪(7) Plan 4: + 1,670 SF, 4 Bed, 4 Bath ▪(2) Plan 5: + 2,000 SF, 4 Bed, 4 Bath Density:17.7 Homes per Acre Parking: Required: 104 Spaces (3.06 spaces per home) ▪(8) 2 Bedroom x 2.25 Spaces = 18 Spaces ▪(14) 3 Bedroom x 3.0 Spaces = 42 Spaces ▪(9) 4 Bedroom x 3.5 Spaces = 31.5 Spaces Provided: 104 Spaces (3.06 spaces per home) ▪Garage: 68 Spaces ▪Head In: 25 Spaces (8.5' x 18') ▪ADA: 2 Spaces (9' x 18') ▪Parallel: 3 Spaces (8' x 22') ▪Future EV:1 Spaces (9' x 18') Open Space: Required: 10,850 SF Total (350 per home) ▪Common: xx SF (10' min. dim.) ▪Private: xx SF (10' min. dim. ground; 7' min. dim. deck) Provided: 11,986 SF Total (386 SF per home) ▪Common: 11,985 SF (10' Min. Dimension) ▪Private: xx SF (10' Min. Dimension) Lot Coverage:xx SF (xx% of site) Trash enclosure and bulky item pick up area Road acts as buffer and setback to existing residential Secondary trash enclosure Transformer location Secondary transformer ·142 ·261 ·241 ∙91 ∙55 ∙57 ∙22 ∙90 ∙39 %&405 !"5 Source: OCTAM Version 5, Base Year (2016), March, 2020 Attachment B Daily VMT per Service Population in Anaheim TAZs as Compared to the Orange County Average (2016) Anaheim City No Service Population < -15% below the Orange County Average 0 to -15 % below the Orange County Average Higher than the Orange County Average A» ?l %&l( A¥ A¾ ?ê ?k A» !"^$ %&o( %&l( A¾ AÊ !"^$ !"^$Aß 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 141516 17 1819202122 23 2425 26 27 28 2930 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 4142 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 545556 57 58 59 60 6162 63 64 65 66 67 686970 71 72 7374 7576 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84 858687 88 89 90 919293 94 95 96 97 98 99100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156157 158159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186187188189 190 191 192 193 194195 196 197 198 199200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229230231232233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267268 269 270 271 272 273 274275 276 277 278 279 280 281282283284285 286 287 288 289 290291 292 293 294 295 296 297298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308309 310 311312 313 314315316317 318 319320321 322 323 324 325326 327 328329 330 331 332 333334335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344345 346 347348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360361 362 363 364365366 252 367 368 369 370371372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 394395396397398399 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419420 421 422 423424 426 427 428 429 430431432433 434 435 436 437 438439 440441442 443 444 445 446447448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462463464465466 467 468469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486487 488 489 490 491492493 494 495 496 497 498499 500 501 502 503504 505506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516517518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559560 561 562 563 564 565566 567 568 569570571 572573574575576577578579580581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634635 636 637638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653654 655 656 657 658 659660661 662 663664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672673674 675 676677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726727 729 730 731 732 733734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755756 757 758 759760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800801 802 803 804 805 806 807808 809810811812813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926927 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 941 942 943 944 945 946 948 949 950 951 952953 954 955 956957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 987 988 989 990 991 992993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1002 1004 1005 1006 1008 1010 1012 1015 1016 101710181020 10211022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 10281029 1030 1031 1032 10331034 1036 1039 1040 1041 1043 1044 1045 1046 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 105310541055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 10631064 1065 1066 1067 1068 10691070 1071 1072 107310741075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1081 1082 1083 1084 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1101 1102 1103 110411061107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1117 11181119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 11261127 1128 1129 11301131 1132 1133 11341135 1136 11371138 1139 1140 11411142 11431144 1145 1146 1148 1149 1150 1151 11521153 1154 1156 1157 1158 1159 11601161 11621163 1164 1165 1166 1167 11681169 1170 1172 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 11821183 1184 1185 1186 1188 1189 11901191 1192 1193 1195 1196 1197 11981199 12001201 120212041205 1207 12081210 12111212 12131214121512161217 1219 1221 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1229 12301231123212331234 1235 1236 1238 1240 12411242 1243 12441245 1246 1248 1249 1251 1252 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 12611262 1263 1265 1266 1267 12681269 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1278 1279 12801281 1282 1284 1285 1286 1287 1289 1290 1291 1292 12931294 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1308 1311 1312 1313 13141315 1316 131813191320 13211322 1323 1324 1328 1329 13311332 1333 1334 1335 133613371338 1339 1340 1341 134213431344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1351 1353 1355 13561357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1366 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1376 1377 1379 13801381 1382 1383 13841385 1386 1387 1388 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 13951396 1397 1398 1399 1401 14021403 1404 1405 14061407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 14131414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 14201421 1422 1423 1424 14251426 1427 14281429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 14371438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 14451447 14481449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 14561457 1458 1459 1460 1461 146314651466 1467 14681469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 14881489 14911492 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 15081510 1511 1512 1513 15151516 15171518 15191520 1521 15221523 1524 1525 1527 1526 1528 152915301531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1539 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 15481549 1550 1551 15521553 1554 15551556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 15801581 15821584 1585 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1604 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 16451646 1648 1649 1650 1651 1654 1655 16561657 1653 1658 165916601661 1662 1663 1664 1665 16661667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 170017011702 17051706 170717081709 17101711 17121713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 17221723 1724 1725 17261727 17281729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 17361737 1738 1740 1741 OCTAM 5.0 TAZ 2/19/2020 W:\Requests\PDCS\SP\PA\MODELING\TAZ\mxd\OCTAM5.0_2020-0219.mxd 0284 TAZ12_TEXT 2012 TAZ in Text format 284 TAZ12 2012 TAZ numerical format 2453 DU16 2016 Dwelling Units 9927 POP16 2016 Total Population 133 GQPOP16 2016 Group Quarters Population 9794 RPOP16 2016 Resident (Household) Population 564 SFD16 2016 Single Family Detached Dwelling Units 1889 MFD16 2016 Multi Family Dwelling Units 2302 TOCDU16 2016 Total Occupied Dwelling Units 538 OCSDU16 2016 Occupied Single Family Detached DUs 1764 OCMDU16 2016 Occupied Multiple Family DUs 747 SEN16 2016 K-12 School Enrollment 0 UEN16 2016 University Enrollment 3597 REM16 2016 Resident Employed Population 1623 EMP2016 2016 Total Employment 25 RE2016 2016 Retail Employment 1335 SE2016 2016 Service Employment 229 OTH2016 2016 Other Employment 34 PSCH2016 2016 K-12 Public School Employment $42,266 MHHINC16 2016 Median Household Income (2016 dollars) 320.96 ACRES Acres 4.254561 PPHH16 2016 Residential Persons Per Occupied Household Source: OCTA Attachment B Noise Memorandum kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Andy Uk, City of Anaheim Ryan Chiene, Jacqueline Tran, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 9, 2022 Subject: Harbor Townhomes Residential Development – Noise Analysis Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the noise impacts associated with construction and operations of the proposed Harbor Townhomes Residential Project (“project” or “proposed project”), located in the City of Anaheim, California. This memorandum has been prepared to support an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, this analysis addresses the noise impacts referenced in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d). Project Location The project site is located at 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 North Victor Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California (City). The project site is approximately 1.75acres and is comprised of three parcels (Accessor Parcel Numbers [APNs] 271-071-07, -08, and-10). The site is bordered by Palm Motor Lodge and a mobile home lot to the north, multi-family residences to the west, detached single- family residences and commercial services to the south, and North Harbor Boulevard to the east. The site is currently developed with a commercial center and associated surface parking. Project Description The proposed project would allow for the construction of 31 single-family attached homes on 1.75 acres (17.7 du-acre). All homes are proposed to be for-sale at market rate. The requested entitlements for the project include a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit with modified development standards. The attached townhome units will have attached two-car garages with a mix of tandem and side-by-side configurations, as well as private decks and patios (private open space). The homes range in size from 1,002 square feet to 1,814 square feet with 2-4 bedrooms and 2.5-4 bathrooms. The units will be served by private drive aisle accessed from two entries on Harbor and Victor. The private drive aisles as well as all common open space, private utilities serving the project, and building exteriors (including roofs) will be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association. In addition to the 62 garage parking spaces, there will be 31 guest parking spaces onsite including two ADA. See Exhibit 1: Page 2 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Conceptual Site Plan for more details. Construction is anticipated to commence in September 2022 and be completed by November 2023. kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Exhibit 1: Conceptual Site Plan Page 4 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Noise Background Sound is technically described in terms of amplitude (loudness) and frequency (pitch). The standard unit of sound amplitude measurement is the decibel (dB). The decibel scale is a logarithmic scale that describes the physical intensity of the pressure vibrations that make up any sound. The pitch of the sound is related to the frequency of the pressure vibration. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to a given sound level at all frequencies, a special frequency-dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A-weighted decibel scale (dBA) provides this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Noise, on the other hand, is typically defined as unwanted sound. A typical noise environment consists of a base of steady ambient noise that is the sum of various distant and indistinguishable noise sources. Superimposed on this background noise is the sound from individual local sources. These can vary from an occasional aircraft or train passing by to virtually continuous noise from traffic on a major highway. Several rating scales have been developed to analyze the adverse effect of community noise on people. Since environmental noise fluctuates over time, these scales consider that the effect of noise on people is largely dependent on the total acoustical energy content of the noise as well as the time of day when the noise occurs. For example, the equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) is the average acoustic energy content of noise for a stated period of time; thus, the Leq of a time-varying noise and that of a steady noise are the same if they deliver the same acoustic energy to the ear during exposure. The Day-Night Sound level (Ldn) is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA “weighting” added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the nighttime. The Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is a 24-hour average Leq with a 10 dBA weighting added to noise during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. and an additional 5 dBA weighting during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. to account for noise sensitivity in the evening and nighttime. Regulatory Setting City of Anaheim General Plan The Noise Element of the City’s General Plan contains noise and land use compatibility standards for various land uses throughout the City; refer to Table 1: Anaheim Noise and Land Use Compatibility. These standards and criteria are used in the land use planning process to reduce future noise and land use incompatibilities. The standards shown in the table are the primary tool that allows the City to ensure integrated planning for compatibility between land uses and outdoor noise. Page 5 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 1: Noise and Land Use Compatibility Land Use Category CNEL, dBA1 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential-Low Density Single-family, Duplex, Mobile Homes Residential – Multiple Family Transient Lodging – Motels, Hotels Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries Office Buildings, Businesses, Commercial and Professional Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture Normally Acceptable: Specified land use is satisfactory based on the assumption that any buildings involved are of conventional construction, without special noise insulation requirements. Conditionally Acceptable: New construction should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Outdoor environment will seem noisy. Normally Unacceptable: New construction should be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made with needed noise insulation features included in the design. Outdoor areas must be shielded. Page 6 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 1: Noise and Land Use Compatibility Land Use Category CNEL, dBA1 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Construction costs to make the indoor environment acceptable would be prohibitive and the outdoor environment would not be usable. Source: City of Anaheim,City of Anaheim General Plan, Figure N-2: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure (Exterior), May 2004. The Noise Element also contains the State of California interior and exterior noise standards for various land uses; refer to Table 2: Interior and Exterior Noise Standards. Table 2: Interior and Exterior Noise Standards Land Use CNEL (dBA) Categories Uses Interior1 Exterior 2 Residential Single and multiple-family, duplex 453 65 Mobile Homes -654 Commercial Hotel, motel, transient housing 45 - Commercial retail, bank, restaurant 55 - Office building, research and development, professional offices 50 - Amphitheater, concert hall, auditorium, movie theater 45 - Gymnasium 50 - Sports Club 55 - Manufacturing, warehousing, wholesale, utilities 65 - Movie Theaters 45 - Institutional/Public Hospital, school classrooms/playgrounds 45 65 Church, library 45 - Open Space Parks -65 Notes: 1.Indoor environment excluding: bathrooms, kitchens, toilets, closets, and corridors. 2.Outdoor environment limited to: private yard of single-family dwellings, multiple-family private patios or balconies accessed from within the dwelling (balconies 6 feet deep or less are exempt), mobile home parks, park picnic areas, school playgrounds, hospital patios. 3.Noise level requirement with closed windows, mechanical ventilation or other means of natural ventilation shall be provided as per Chapter 12, Section 1205 of the Uniform Building Code. 4.Exterior noise levels should be such that interior noise levels will not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. Source: City of Anaheim,City of Anaheim General Plan, Table N-3: State of California Interior and Exterior Noise Standards, May 2004. Page 7 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 City of Anaheim Municipal Code The following sections of the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) are applicable to the proposed project: Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels. AMC Section 6.70.010 (Sound Pressure Levels) states that no person shall, within the City, create any sound, radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property in excess of 60 dBA. Section 6.70.010 of the AMC also exempts certain noise sources from the provisions of this code, including traffic sounds, sound created by emergency activities, and construction or building repair of any premises during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. City of Anaheim Municipal Code: Section 18.40.090, Sound Attenuation for Residential Developments. AMC Section 6.70.0110 (Sound Attenuation for Residential Developments), applies to residential developments involving the construction of two or more dwelling units, or residential subdivisions resulting in two or more parcels, and located within 600 feet of any railroad, freeway, expressway, major arterial, primary arterial or secondary arterial, as designated by the Circulation Element of the General Plan. A noise level analysis is required for any new residential development or subdivision that meets these criteria, which must include mitigation measures that would be required to comply with applicable City noise standards including, but not limited to, the following: §Exterior noise within the private rear yard of any single-family lot and/or within any common recreation areas, shall be attenuated to a maximum of 65 dBA CNEL; interior noise levels shall be attenuated to a maximum of 45 dBA CNEL, or to a level designated by the Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City (identified in Section 18.40.090). §Exterior noise within common recreation areas of any single-family attached or multiple-family dwelling project shall be attenuated to a maximum of 65 dB CNEL; interior noise levels shall be attenuated to a maximum of 45 dB CNEL, or to a level designated by the Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City (identified in Section 18.40.090). According to Section 18.040.090.060, the Planning Commission may grant a deviation from the requirements pertaining to exterior noise levels, given that all of the following conditions exist: §The deviation does not exceed 5 dB above the prescribed levels for exterior noise;1and §Measures to attenuate noise to the prescribed levels would compromise or conflict with the aesthetic value of the project. 1 The deviation from prescribed levels does not pertain to interior noise levels. Page 8 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Existing Environmental Setting Mobile sources of noise, especially cars and trucks, are the most common and significant sources of noise in the City. Other sources of noise are the various land uses (i.e., residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational and parks activities) throughout the City that generate stationary- source noise. The existing mobile noise sources in the project area are generated by motor vehicles traveling on Harbor Avenue and Romneya Drive. The primary sources of stationary noise in the project vicinity are those associated with the surrounding commercial and residential uses. Such noise sources include idling vehicles, music playing, mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioning equipment), dogs barking, and people talking and are typical of urban areas. The noise associated with these sources may represent a single-event noise occurrence or short-term noise. Noise Impacts Construction Noise Construction noise typically occurs intermittently and varies depending on the nature or phase of construction (e.g., land clearing, grading, excavation, paving). Noise generated by construction equipment, including earth movers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. During construction, exterior noise levels could affect the sensitive receptors near the construction site. Construction activities would include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Such activities may require graders, dozers, and tractors during site preparation and grading; cranes, forklifts, generators, tractors, and welders during building construction; pavers, rollers, mixers, tractors, and paving equipment during paving; and air compressors during architectural coating. Typical operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve 1 or 2 minutes of full power operation followed by 3 to 4 minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts). Noise generated by construction equipment, including earth movers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. Typical noise levels associated with individual construction equipment are listed in Table 3: Typical Construction Noise Levels. Table 3: Typical Construction Noise Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet from Source Air Compressor 81 Backhoe 80 Compactor 82 Concrete Mixer 85 Concrete Pump 82 Concrete Vibrator 76 Crane, Mobile 83 Dozer 85 Page 9 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 3: Typical Construction Noise Levels Equipment Typical Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet from Source Generator 82 Grader 85 Jack Hammer 88 Loader 80 Paver 85 Pneumatic Tool 85 Pump 77 Roller 85 Saw 76 Shovel 82 Truck 84 Source: Federal Transit Administration,Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. Following the methodology for quantitative construction noise assessments in the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s)Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (September 2018) (FTA Noise and Vibration Manual), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) was used to predict construction noise at the nearest receptors (i.e., the residential uses 24 feet to the west of the project site). Table 4: Project Construction Noise Levels shows the estimated exterior construction noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors. Following FTA methodology, when calculating construction noise, all equipment is assumed to operate at the center of the project because equipment would operate throughout the project site and not at a fixed location for extended periods of time. Therefore, the distances used in the RCNM model were 125 feet for the mobile homes located to the north, 176 feet for multifamily residential uses to the west, and 276 feet for single family residential uses to the south. As shown in Table 4, the highest anticipated construction noise level of 75.8 dBA (during the demolition phase) would not exceed the FTA noise threshold of 80 dBA for residential uses. In addition, compliance with AMC Section 6.70.010 would further minimize impacts from construction noise, as construction would be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Therefore, because project construction noise levels would not exceed FTA noise standards and construction activities would be required to comply with AMC provisions, noise impacts would be less than significant noise impact in this regard. Although construction noise levels may exceed the existing ambient levels in the area, construction would be temporary and would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the area. Page 10 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 4: Project Construction Noise Levels Construction Phase Receptor Location Worst Case Modeled Exterior Noise Level (dBA Leq)2 Noise Threshold (dBA Leq)3 Exceeded?Land Use Direction Distance (feet)1 Demolition Residential North 125 75.8 80 No Residential West 176 72.9 80 No Residential South 276 69.0 80 No Site Preparation Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Grading Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Building Construction Residential North 125 73.8 80 No Residential West 176 70.8 80 No Residential South 276 66.9 80 No Paving Residential North 125 68.7 80 No Residential West 176 65.7 80 No Residential South 276 61.8 80 No Architectural Coating Residential North 125 68.4 80 No Residential West 176 65.4 80 No Residential South 276 61.5 80 No Notes: 1.Per the methodology described in the FTA Noise and Vibration Manual (September 2018), distances are measured from the nearest receptors to the center of the project construction site. 2.Assumes a 5 dBA reduction from intervening perimeter walls along the eastern and western property boundary. 3.The City does not have a quantitative noise threshold for construction. Therefore, the construction noise thresholds from the FTA Noise and Vibration Manual (September 2018) are conservatively used for this analysis. Source: Federal Highway Administration,Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006. Refer to Appendix A: RCNM Modeling Results for noise modeling results. Page 11 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Operational Noise The project site is currently developed and occupied by several commercial uses, which generate noise. Implementation of the proposed project would create new sources of noise in the project vicinity. The primary noise sources associated with the project that could potentially impact nearby sensitive uses include mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioners, etc.), typical stationary noise from residential uses (e.g., dogs barking, use of landscape equipment, people talking, etc.), and off-site traffic noise. Mechanical Equipment Mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] equipment) typically generates noise levels of approximately 52 dBA at 50 feet.2 Sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.3 The nearest sensitive receptors (multi-family residences to the west) would be located as close as 30 feet from the HVAC equipment at the project site. At this distance, mechanical equipment noise levels would be approximately 56.4 dBA and would not exceed the City’s 60 dBA exterior noise standard set forth in AMC Section 6.70.010 and/or the 65 dBA standard for residential in the Anaheim General Plan. Therefore, impacts from mechanical equipment would be less than significant. Residential Stationary Noise The project would also result in stationary noise that is typical of residential uses/neighborhoods, including the use of landscaping equipment, dogs barking, music playing, people talking, etc. These noise sources can generate noise levels between up to 65 dBA at a distance of 50 feet.4 However, noise events from these stationary sources are generally sporadic, short in duration, and would not last for extended periods of time. In addition, stationary noise is generated by residences to the north, south, and west, and by the existing on-site commercial uses on-site under existing conditions. Therefore, stationary noise levels from the project would not result in a noticeable increase in ambient noise levels and would comply with the noise standards set forth in AMC Section 6.70.010. Impacts would be less than significant impact. Mobile Traffic Noise Project implementation would result in an increase of traffic trips to project area roadways. According to the 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard Traffic Impact Analysis Summary of (TJW Engineering Inc., December 2021) (Traffic Impact Analysis), the project would generate 209 daily trips, with 12 morning 2 Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel1, and Cynthia A. Kladden,Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. 3 Cyril M. Harris,Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 4 Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel1, and Cynthia A. Kladden,Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. Page 12 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 peak hour trips and 16 evening peak hour trips. In general a 3-dBA increase in traffic noise is barely perceptible to people, while a 5-dBA increase is readily noticeable. Traffic volumes on project area roadways would have to approximately double for the resulting traffic noise levels to generate a barely perceptible 3-dBA increase.5 According to the City of Anaheim Daily Traffic Counts by OCTA6, North Harbor Boulevard has approximately 34,900 ADT. The proposed project would result in approximately 209 net daily trips, which is not enough to double the existing traffic volumes on North Harbor Boulevard or Victor Avenue (the primary access roadways to the project site). Therefore, the proposed project would not generate enough traffic to result in a noticeable 3-dBA increase in ambient noise levels. Impacts would be less than significant. Vibration Impacts Increases in ground-borne vibration levels attributable to the proposed project would be primarily associated with short-term construction-related activities. Construction on the project site would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary ground-borne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. The FTA has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations. In general, the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations (i.e., 0.2 in/sec) appears to be conservative. The types of construction vibration impacts include human annoyance and building damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. For example, for a building that is constructed with reinforced concrete with no plaster, the FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.20 in/sec is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. This analysis uses the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations at non-engineered timber and masonry buildings of 0.2 inch-per-second peak particle velocity (PPV) and human annoyance criterion of 0.4 inch-per-second PPV in accordance with Caltrans guidance7 to evaluate potential construction vibration impacts. Table 5: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, lists vibration levels at 25 feet for typical construction equipment. The nearest off-site building/structure is the commercial retail use to remain at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard at West Victor Avenue located 25 feet southeast, and 5 According to the California Department of Transportation,Technical Noise Supplement to Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), it takes a doubling of traffic to create a noticeable (i.e., 3 dBA) noise increase. 6 According to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Department,Daily Traffic Counts – Average Daily Traffic Volume Map, Romneya Drive has 8,200 ADT and North Harbor Bouelvard has 34,900 ADT. 7 California Department of Transportation,Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, Table 20, September 2013. Page 13 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 the multifamily residences located approximately 30 feet to the west of project construction activities. Groundborne vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. As indicated in the table, based on FTA data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operations that would be used during project construction range from 0.003 to 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet from the source of activity. Table 5: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Equipment Peak Particle Velocity at 25 Feet (in/sec) Peak Particle Velocity at 30 Feet (in/sec) Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.068 Caisson Drilling 0.089 0.068 Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.058 Rock Breaker 0.059 0.045 Jackhammer 0.035 0.027 Small Bulldozer/Tractors 0.003 0.002 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018. As shown in Table 5, at 25 feet the vibration velocities from construction equipment would reach approximately 0.089 in/sec PPV, which is below the FTA’s 0.20 in/sec PPV threshold for building damage and Caltrans’ 0.4 in/sec PPV threshold for human annoyance. It is also acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the nearest off-site structures. Concentration of construction activities would occur at least 30 feet from the receptor. It is acknowledged that some construction activity may occur right at the property line adjacent to mobile homes, but would be infrequent and short in duration. Once operational, the proposed project would not include vibration-generating uses or operations. Therefore, vibration impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. Conclusion Project implementation would result in less than significant short-term and long-term noise and vibration impacts., the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Appendix A RCNM Modeling Results Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 125.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 69.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 72.0 65.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.0 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 125.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 73.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 75.6 71.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.6 73.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 176.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 70.7 66.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 72.6 68.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.6 70.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 276.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 66.8 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 68.7 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.7 66.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 125.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 81.6 74.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 73.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 81.6 75.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 176.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 78.6 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 70.7 66.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 78.6 72.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 276.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 74.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 66.8 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 74.7 69.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 125.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 73.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 75.6 71.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.6 73.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 176.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 70.7 66.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 72.6 68.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.6 70.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 276.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 66.8 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 68.7 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.7 66.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Paver No 50 77.2 125.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Paver 69.3 66.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 72.0 65.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.0 68.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Paver No 50 77.2 176.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Paver 66.3 63.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 69.1 62.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.1 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Paver No 50 77.2 276.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Paver 62.4 59.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 65.2 58.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.2 61.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 02/07/2022 Case Description: Anaheim Harbor Townhomes **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential N Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 125.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 125.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 73.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 75.6 71.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.6 73.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential W Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 176.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 70.7 66.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 72.6 68.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.6 70.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Dozer No 40 81.7 276.0 0.0 Scraper No 40 83.6 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Dozer 66.8 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Scraper 68.7 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.7 66.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 176.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 176.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 66.7 62.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 69.1 62.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.1 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #3 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Residential S Residential 1.0 1.0 1.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 276.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 276.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 62.8 58.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 65.2 58.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.2 61.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Attachment C Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Memorandum Page 1 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Andy Uk, City of Anaheim Ryan Chiene and Jacqueline Tran, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. February 9, 2022 Subject:Harbor Townhomes Residential Development – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with construction and operations of the proposed Harbor Townhomes Residential Development Project (“project” or “proposed project”), located in the City of Anaheim, California. This memorandum has been prepared to support an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, this analysis addresses the air quality impacts referenced in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d). Project Location The project site is located at 1075-1085 North Harbor Boulevard and 523 North Victor Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (City). The project is approximately 1.75 acres and is comprised of three parcels (Accessor Parcel Numbers [APNs] 271-071-07, -08, and -10). The site is bordered by the Palm Motor Lodge and a mobile home lot to the north, multi-family residences to the west, detached single-family residences and commercial services to the south, and North Harbor Boulevard to the east. The site is currently developed with a commercial center and associated surface parking. Project Description The proposed project would allow for the construction of 31 single-family attached homes on 1.75 acres (17.7 du/acre). All homes are proposed to be for-sale at market rate. The requested entitlements for the project include a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit with modified development standards. The attached townhome units will have attached two-car garages with a mix of tandem and side-by-side configurations, as well as private decks and patios (private open space). The homes range in size from 1,002 square feet to 1,814 square feet with 2-4 bedrooms and 2.5-4 bathrooms. The units will be served by private drive aisle accessed from two entries on Harbor and Victor. The private drive aisles as well as all common open space, private utilities serving the project, and building exteriors (including roofs) will be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association. In addition Page 2 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 to the 62 garage parking spaces, there will be 31 guest parking spaces onsite including two ADA. See Exhibit 1: Conceptual Site Plan for more details. Construction is anticipated to commence in September 2022 and be completed by November 2023. Page 3 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Exhibit 1: Conceptual Site Plan Page 4 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Air Quality Impacts SCAQMD Thresholds The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook provides significance thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOC) (also referred to as reactive organic gases [ROG]), nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOX), particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter (PM10), and particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter (PM2.5). The thresholds apply to both project construction and operation within the SCAQMD jurisdictional boundaries. If the SCAQMD thresholds are exceeded, a potentially significant impact could result. However, ultimately the lead agency determines the thresholds of significance for impacts. If a project proposes development in excess of the established thresholds, as outlined in Table 1: South Coast Air Quality Management District Significance Thresholds, a significant air quality impact may occur and additional analysis is warranted to fully assess the significance of impacts. Table 1: South Coast Air Quality Management District Significance Thresholds Pollutant Mass Daily Thresholds (pounds per day) Construction Operations Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)100 55 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)1 75 55 Particulate Matter up to 10 Microns (PM10)150 150 Particulate Matter up to 2.5 Microns (PM2.5)55 55 Sulphur Oxides (SOX)150 150 Carbon Monoxide (CO)550 550 Notes: 1. VOCs and reactive organic gases (ROGs) are subsets of organic gases that are emitted from the incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons or other carbon-based fuels. Although they represent slightly different subsets of organic gases, they are used interchangeably for the purposes of this analysis. Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, April 2019. Construction Emissions Construction associated with the proposed project would generate short-term emissions of criteria air pollutants. The criteria pollutants of primary concern within the project area include ozone- precursor pollutants (i.e., Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Nitrous Oxide (NOX), Particulate Matter 10 (PM10), and PM2.5). Construction-generated emissions are short term and of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur, but would be considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Construction results in the temporary generation of emissions resulting from site grading, road paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, and the movement of construction equipment, especially on unpaved surfaces. Emissions of airborne particulate matter are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities as well as weather conditions and the appropriate application of water. Page 5 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 The duration of construction activities for the project is estimated to be approximately 15 months, beginning in September 2022 and finishing in November 2023. The project would construct 31 single- family attached homes with private drive aisles, common open space, and parking spaces. Construction-generated emissions associated the proposed project were calculated using the CARB- approved California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), which is designed to model emissions for land use development projects, based on typical construction requirements. See Appendix A: Air Quality and GHG Data for more information regarding the construction assumptions used in this analysis. Predicted maximum daily construction-generated emissions for the proposed project are identified in Table 2: Project Construction Emissions. Table 2: Project Construction Emissions Construction Year Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 2022 1.82 20.39 15.38 0.04 3.98 2.21 2023 36.18 12.18 13.69 0.03 0.92 0.61 Maximum Emissions 36.18 20.39 15.38 0.04 3.98 2.21 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded?No No No No No No Notes: 1. SCAQMD Rule 403 Fugitive Dust applied. The Rule 403 reduction/credits include the following: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. Reductions percentages from the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook (Tables XI-A through XI-E) were applied. No mitigation was applied to construction equipment. Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Appendix A for model outputs. Table 2 shows that construction pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds. While impacts would be considered less than significant, the proposed project would also be subject to SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, and 1113, which prohibit nuisances, require dust control measures, and limit VOC content in paints, respectively. Compliance with the standards SCAQMD rules would further reduce specific construction-related emissions. As shown above, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds and impacts would be less than significant. Operational Emissions Operational emissions are typically associated with mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicle use) and area sources (such as the use of landscape maintenance equipment, hearths, consumer products, and architectural coatings). Energy source emissions would be generated from electricity and natural gas (non-hearth) usage.Table 3: Project Operational Emissions summarizes the operational emissions attributable to the proposed project. As shown in the table, the project’s emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, regional operational emissions would result in a less than significant long-term regional air quality impact. Page 6 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 3: Project Operational Emissions Source Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area 1.35 <1 2.76 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile <1 <1 5.92 <1 1.51 <1 Total 1.95 1.33 8.77 <1 1.58 <1 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded?No No No No No No Notes: 1. Emissions were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0, as recommended by the SCAQMD. Worst-case seasonal maximum daily emissions are reported. Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Appendix A for model outputs. Localized Construction Impacts The nearest sensitive receptors to the project are a mobile home park located adjacent to the north, single-family residences located approximately 63 feet to the south of the project site, and multi- family residences located approximately 30 feet to the west of the project site. To identify impacts to sensitive receptors, the SCAQMD recommends addressing Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) for construction. LSTs were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards' Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (I-4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 2008]) for guidance. The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized impacts associated with project-specific level proposed projects. Because CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily soil disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment, Table 4: Equipment- Specific Grading Rates is used to determine the maximum daily disturbed acreage for comparison to LSTs. For this project, the appropriate source receptor area (SRA) for the localized significance thresholds is the Central Orange County (SRA 17) area since this area includes the project site. LSTs apply to NO X, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The SCAQMD produced look-up tables for projects that disturb areas less than or equal to 5 acres in size. Based on the daily equipment modeled in CalEEMod, project construction is anticipated to disturb approximately 2 acres in a single day. As such, the LSTs for a maximum daily disturbance of 2 acres were used in this analysis. Page 7 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 4: Equipment-Specific Grading Rates Construction Phase Equipment Type Equipment Quantity Acres Graded per 8-Hour Day Operating Hours per Day Acres Graded per Day Grading Crawler Tractor 2 0.5 8 1 Graders 1 0.5 8 0.5 Rubber-Tired Dozers 1 0.5 8 0.5 Scrapers 0 1.0 0 0 Total Acres Graded per Day 2 Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. SCAQMD’s methodology indicates that “off-site mobile emissions from the project should not be included in the emissions compared to LSTs.” Therefore, for purposes of the construction LST analysis, only emissions included in the CalEEMod “on-site” emissions outputs were considered. The nearest sensitive receptor to the project site is the multi-family residences located 30 feet (9.1 meters) to the west of the project site. LST thresholds are provided for distances to sensitive receptors of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. Therefore, as recommended by the SCAQMD, LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters were used in this analysis for receptors closer than 25 meters. Table 5: Localized Significance of Emissions, presents the results of localized emissions during construction activity. Emissions of these pollutants on the peak day of construction would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during construction activities. Table 5: Localized Significance of Emissions Source/Activity Emissions (pounds per day)1 NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction Emissions Demolition 2022 16.62 13.96 2.98 1.11 Site Preparation 2022 14.63 7.09 3.30 1.86 Grading 2022 16.9 9.22 3.77 2.15 Building Construction 2022 12.50 12.73 0.59 0.57 Building Construction 2023 11.71 12.61 0.51 0.50 Paving 2023 6.24 8.80 0.31 0.28 Architectural Coating 2023 1.30 1.81 0.07 0.07 Maximum Daily Emissions 16.62 13.96 3.77 2.15 SCAQMD Localized Screening Threshold (2 acres of disturbance at 25 meters)115 715 6 4 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold?No No No No Page 8 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 Table 5: Localized Significance of Emissions Source/Activity Emissions (pounds per day)1 NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Operational Emissions On-Site Emissions (Area + Energy Sources)0.16 1.42 0.28 0.08 SCAQMD Localized Screening Threshold (2 acres of disturbance at 25 meters)115 715 2 1 Exceed SCAQMD Threshold?No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Appendix A for model data outputs. Localized Operational Impacts According to the SCAQMD localized significance threshold methodology, LSTs apply to on-site sources. LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters for SRA 17 were conservatively used in this analysis. According to the SCAQMD localized significance threshold methodology, LSTs apply to on-site sources. LSTs for receptors located at 25 meters for SRA 17 were conservatively utilized in this analysis. The 2-acre LST threshold was used for 1.75-acre project site. The operational emissions shown in Table 5 include all on-site project-related stationary sources (i.e., area and energy sources). The maximum daily emissions of these pollutants during operations would not result in significant concentrations of pollutants at nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, significant impacts would not occur concerning LSTs during operational activities. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots An analysis of CO “hot spots” is needed to determine whether the change in the level of service (LOS) of an intersection from the proposed project would have the potential to result in exceedances of the CAAQS or NAAQS. It has long been recognized that CO exceedances are caused by vehicular emissions, primarily when vehicles are idling at intersections. Vehicle emissions standards have become increasingly stringent in the last 20 years. Currently, the CO standard in California is a maximum of 3.4 grams per mile for passenger cars (requirements for certain vehicles are more stringent). With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations have steadily declined. Accordingly, with the steadily decreasing CO emissions from vehicles, even very busy intersections do not result in exceedances of the CO standard. An analysis prepared for CO attainment in the South Coast Air Basin by the SCAQMD can assist in evaluating the potential for CO exceedances. CO attainment was thoroughly analyzed as part of the SCAQMD’s 2003 Air Quality Management Plan. The Basin was re-designated as attainment in 2007 and is no longer addressed in the SCAQMD’s AQMP. The 2003 Air Quality Management Plan is the most recent AQMP that addresses CO concentrations. As part of the SCAQMD CO Hotspot analysis, the Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue intersection, Page 9 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 one of the most congested intersections in Southern California with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day, was modeled for CO concentrations. This modeling effort identified a CO concentration high of 4.6 parts per million (ppm), which is well below the 35- ppm federal standard. The proposed project considered herein would not produce the volume of traffic required to generate a CO hot spot in the context of SCAQMD’s 2003 CO hot spot analysis. As the CO hotspots were not experienced at the Wilshire Boulevard/Veteran Avenue intersection even as it accommodates 100,000 vehicles daily, it can be reasonably inferred that CO hotspots would not be experienced at any vicinity intersections as the project would generate 209 daily vehicle trips. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project would include direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from project construction and operations. Construction is considered a direct source since these emissions occur at the site. Direct operational-related GHG emissions for the proposed project would include emissions from area and mobile sources, while indirect emissions are from energy consumption, water demand, and solid waste. Construction GHG Emissions Construction of the project would result in direct emissions of CO2, N2O, and CH4 from construction equipment and the transport of materials and construction workers to and from the project site. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of the project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.1 Total GHG emissions generated during all phases of construction were combined and are presented in Table 6: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The CalEEMod outputs are contained within Appendix A. As shown in the table, the project construction would result in 260 MTCO2e (approximately 8.67 MTCO2e/year when amortized over 30 years). Table 6: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction MTCO2e per Year Total Construction 260 Amortized over 30 Years 8.67 Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Appendix A for model data outputs. Operational GHG Emissions Operational or long-term emissions occur over the life of the proposed project. GHG emissions would result from direct emissions such as project generated vehicular traffic, on-site combustion of natural 1 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District,Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13, August 26, 2009). Page 10 kimley-horn.com 1100 W. Town and Country Road, Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030 gas, operation of any landscaping equipment. Operational GHG emissions would also result from indirect sources, such as off-site generation of electrical power over the life of the project, the energy required to convey water to, and wastewater from the project site, the emissions associated with solid waste generated from the project site, and any fugitive refrigerants from air conditioning or refrigerators. Table 7: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions summarizes the total GHG emissions associated with proposed project. As shown, the project would generate approximately 260 MTCO2e/year. The project would not result in an increase in GHG emissions that exceed the SCAQMD’s screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/yr. Therefore, project-related GHG emissions would be less than significant. Table 7: Total Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions Source MTCO2e per Year Construction Amortized over 30 Years 8.67 Area Source 7.28 Energy 107.00 Mobile 237.15 Waste 9.18 Water 8.87 Total Project Emissions 378.16 SCAQMD Project Threshold 3,000 Threshold Exceeded?No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Appendix A for model data outputs. Conclusion Project implementation would result in less than significant construction and operational air quality and GHG impacts. No mitigation measures would be required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Appendix A Air Quality and GHG Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0 Parking Lot 33.00 Space 0.30 13,200.00 0 Enclosed Parking Structure 62.00 Space 0.56 24,800.00 Anaheim Harbor Townhomes Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 89 City Park 0.25 Acre 0.25 11,042.46 0 Single Family Housing 31.00 Dwelling Unit 0.64 55,800.00 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Residential acreage based on total site acreage. City park = common area open space. Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 Precipitation Freq (Days)30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2023 Woodstoves - per SCAQMD Rule 445 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD rule compliance Energy Mitigation - Construction Phase - Construction Schedule: September 2022-November 2023 Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Trips and VMT - Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates based on Trip Gen Memo Area Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 60.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 220.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 6.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 4.8550e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 26.35 27.90 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.55 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 3.9420e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.13 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 6.5220e-003 0.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,890.00 11,042.46 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.06 0.64 tblFleetMix UBUS 3.8500e-004 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,606.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 6.5600e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 7.2300e-004 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 6.74 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 6.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 6.74 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 1.8216 20.2445 15.3985 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,527.8814 2,527.8814 0.4141 0.0378 2,548.1210 0.7440 0.2530 4,108.0383 2023 36.1808 12.1536 13.7507 0.0271 0.4280 0.5183 0.9463 0.1151 0.5004 0.6155 0.0000 0.8096 4.1707 0.0000 4,014.0399 4,014.03990.0392 7.2940 0.8659 8.0433 3.48112022 0.7440 0.2530 4,108.0383 Mitigated Construction 0.8096 4.1707 0.0000 4,014.0399 4,014.03990.0392 7.2940 0.8659 8.0433 3.4811Maximum 36.1808 20.2445 15.3985 1.8216 20.2445 15.3985 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.7440 0.2530 4,108.03830.8096 2.2071 0.0000 4,014.0399 4,014.03990.0392 3.2263 0.8659 3.9756 1.51752022 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,527.8814 2,527.8814 0.4141 0.0378 2,548.12102023 36.1808 12.1536 13.7507 0.0271 0.4064 0.5183 0.9247 0.1098 0.5004 0.6102 0.0000 0.7440 0.2530 4,108.0383 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 0.8096 2.2071 0.0000 4,014.0399 4,014.03990.0392 3.2263 0.8659 3.9756 1.5175Maximum 36.1808 20.2445 15.3985 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.96 0.00 45.49 54.75 0.00 41.14 0.00 2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 0.8711 0.0108 803.4048 Energy 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 595.4495 778.40030.0279 1.2911 1.2911Area 2,521.6375 0.0833 0.0563 1,478.0288 Total 2.7940 1.4116 16.4517 0.0433 1.5044 1.3158 2.8201 0.4010 1.3151 1.7161 182.9508 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 1,459.1816 1,459.18160.0142 1.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010Mobile0.5859 0.6082 6.0092 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,293.4161 2,476.3669 0.9590 0.0715 N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Area1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 Category lb/day lb/day 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010Mobile0.5859 0.6082 6.0092 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 Energy 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 ROG NOx CO SO2 2,293.4161 2,293.4161 0.1037 0.0715 2,317.3053 0.0833 0.0563 1,478.0288 Total 1.9573 1.2876 8.8536 0.0185 1.5044 0.0762 1.5806 0.4010 0.0756 0.4766 0.0000 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 1,459.1816 1,459.18160.0142 1.5044 89.18 0.00 8.10 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 29.94 8.78 46.18 57.30 0.00 94.21 43.95 0.00 94.25 72.23 100.00 0.00 7.39 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 5 6 3 Grading Grading 10/7/2022 12/29/2022 5 60 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/6/2022 Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date 5 10 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 5.63 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 60 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 220 5 Paving Paving 11/3/2023 11/16/2023 5 10 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/30/2022 11/2/2023 Acres of Paving: 0.86 Residential Indoor: 112,995; Residential Outdoor: 37,665; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,280 OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.73 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 462.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 326.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixSite Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixBuilding Construction 7 32.00 11.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixArchitectural Coating 1 6.00 0.00 0.00 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0042 0.0000 5.0042 0.7577 0.0000 0.7577 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.0000 2,338.2191 0.5921 2,338.2191 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 5.0042 0.8379 5.8421 0.7577 0.7829 1.5406 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.5921 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0272 0.4301 0.1103Hauling0.0936 3.5965 1.0102 0.0391 0.0263 0.4278 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1489 0.2501 1,640.0463 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0260 0.1364 1,561.7827 1,561.78270.0138 0.4029 1,690.6231 1,690.6231 0.1519 0.2530 1,769.8193 3.0100e- 003 2.8800e- 003 129.7729 Total 0.1327 3.6228 1.4381 0.0151 0.5482 0.0280 0.5762 0.1489 0.0268 0.1756 7.2000e- 004 0.0393 128.8404 128.84041.2700e- 003 0.1453 7.8000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385Worker N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.5921 2,338.2191 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 0.0000 0.0000 0.3239 0.00002.1393 0.0000 2.1393 0.3239Fugitive Dust 0.5921 2,338.2191 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.7829 1.1068 0.0000 2,323.4168 2,323.41680.0241 2.1393 0.8379 2.9772 0.3239Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0272 0.4118 0.1058Hauling0.0936 3.5965 1.0102 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.1489 0.2501 1,640.04630.0260 0.1319 1,561.7827 1,561.78270.0138 0.3846 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0391 0.0263 0.4278 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,690.6231 1,690.6231 0.1519 0.2530 1,769.8193 3.0100e- 003 2.8800e- 003 129.7729 Total 0.1327 3.6228 1.4381 0.0151 0.5223 0.0280 0.5503 0.1425 0.0268 0.1693 7.2000e- 004 0.0374 128.8404 128.84041.2700e- 003 0.1377 7.8000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367Worker N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,666.1738 1,666.1738 0.5389 1,679.6457 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 0.0000 3.0039 0.00006.2644 0.0000 6.2644 3.0039Fugitive Dust 0.5389 1,679.6457 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5727 3.5766 1,666.1738 1,666.17380.0172 6.2644 0.6225 6.8870 3.0039Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 79.2864 79.2864 1.8500e- 003 1.7700e- 003 79.8603 1.8500e- 003 1.7700e- 003 79.8603 Total 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 7.8000e- 004 0.0894 4.8000e- 004 0.0899 0.0237 4.4000e- 004 0.0242 4.4000e- 004 0.0242 79.2864 79.28647.8000e- 004 0.0894 4.8000e- 004 0.0899 0.0237Worker N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,666.1738 1,666.1738 0.5389 1,679.6457 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 0.0000 0.0000 1.2842 0.00002.6780 0.0000 2.6780 1.2842Fugitive Dust 0.5389 1,679.6457 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5727 1.8569 0.0000 1,666.1738 1,666.17380.0172 2.6780 0.6225 3.3006 1.2842Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 1.8500e- 003 1.7700e- 003 79.86034.4000e- 004 0.0230 79.2864 79.28647.8000e- 004 0.0848 4.8000e- 004 0.0852 0.0226Worker CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 79.2864 79.2864 1.8500e- 003 1.7700e- 003 79.8603Total 0.0241 0.0162 0.2633 7.8000e- 004 0.0848 4.8000e- 004 0.0852 0.0226 4.4000e- 004 0.0230 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,995.4825 1,995.4825 0.6454 2,011.6169 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 3.4255 0.00007.0875 0.0000 7.0875 3.4255Fugitive Dust 0.6454 2,011.6169 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.6829 4.1084 1,995.4825 1,995.48250.0206 7.0875 0.7423 7.8298 3.4255Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 6.4000e- 003 0.1012 0.0260Hauling0.0220 0.8459 0.2376 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0301 0.0202 0.3291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0350 0.0588 385.7540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.1200e- 003 0.0321 367.3457 367.34573.2400e- 003 0.0948 466.4537 466.4537 0.0373 0.0611 485.5794 2.3200e- 003 2.2100e- 003 99.8253 Total 0.0521 0.8661 0.5667 4.2100e- 003 0.2065 7.0000e- 003 0.2135 0.0556 6.6800e- 003 0.0623 5.6000e- 004 0.0302 99.1080 99.10809.7000e- 004 0.1118 6.0000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296Worker CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,995.4825 1,995.4825 0.6454 2,011.6169 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 0.0000 1.4644 0.00003.0299 0.0000 3.0299 1.4644Fugitive Dust 0.6454 2,011.6169 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.6829 2.1473 0.0000 1,995.4825 1,995.48250.0206 3.0299 0.7423 3.7722 1.4644Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 6.4000e- 003 0.0969 0.0249Hauling0.0220 0.8459 0.2376 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0301 0.0202 0.3291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0350 0.0588 385.7540 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.1200e- 003 0.0310 367.3457 367.34573.2400e- 003 0.0905 466.4537 466.4537 0.0373 0.0611 485.5794 2.3200e- 003 2.2100e- 003 99.8253 Total 0.0521 0.8661 0.5667 4.2100e- 003 0.1964 7.0000e- 003 0.2034 0.0531 6.6800e- 003 0.0598 5.6000e- 004 0.0288 99.1080 99.10809.7000e- 004 0.1060 6.0000e- 004 0.1066 0.0282Worker CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,010.2581 0.3486 2,010.2581 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.5429 2,001.54290.0221 0.5889 0.5889Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.5429 2,001.5429 0.3486 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 0.0963 0.0647 1.0531 228.0933 228.0933 0.0131 0.0327 238.1610 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0183 0.4936 0.1753 2.0800e- 003 0.0703 4.8000e- 003 0.0751 0.0202 4.5900e- 003 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 545.2389 545.2389 0.0205 0.0398 557.6021 7.4100e- 003 7.0800e- 003 319.4410 Total 0.1146 0.5583 1.2284 5.2000e- 003 0.4280 6.7300e- 003 0.4348 0.1151 6.3700e- 003 0.1215 1.7800e- 003 0.0966 317.1455 317.14553.1200e- 003 0.3577 1.9300e- 003 0.3596 0.0949Worker Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,010.2581 0.3486 2,010.2581 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.5429 2,001.54290.0221 0.5889 0.5889Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.5429 2,001.5429 0.3486 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 0.0963 0.0647 1.0531 228.0933 228.0933 0.0131 0.0327 238.1610 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0183 0.4936 0.1753 2.0800e- 003 0.0673 4.8000e- 003 0.0721 0.0195 4.5900e- 003 0.0241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 545.2389 545.2389 0.0205 0.0398 557.6021 7.4100e- 003 7.0800e- 003 319.4410 Total 0.1146 0.5583 1.2284 5.2000e- 003 0.4064 6.7300e- 003 0.4131 0.1098 6.3700e- 003 0.1162 1.7800e- 003 0.0921 317.1455 317.14553.1200e- 003 0.3390 1.9300e- 003 0.3410 0.0903Worker N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Category lb/day lb/day 2,010.2858 0.3399 2,010.2858 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.7877 2,001.78770.0221 0.5145 0.5145Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.7877 2,001.7877 0.3399 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 0.0902 0.0577 0.9799 217.1943 217.1943 0.0129 0.0312 226.8042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.3855 0.1598 1.9800e- 003 0.0703 1.9800e- 003 0.0723 0.0202 1.8900e- 003 0.0221 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 526.0937 526.0937 0.0196 0.0378 537.8352 6.7000e- 003 6.5900e- 003 311.0310 Total 0.1013 0.4432 1.1397 5.0000e- 003 0.4280 3.8100e- 003 0.4318 0.1151 3.5700e- 003 0.1187 1.6800e- 003 0.0965 308.8994 308.89943.0200e- 003 0.3577 1.8300e- 003 0.3595 0.0949Worker N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.3399 2,010.28580.4968 0.4968 0.0000 2,001.7877 2,001.78770.0221 0.5145 0.5145Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,010.2858Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.7877 2,001.7877 0.3399 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 0.0902 0.0577 0.9799 217.1943 217.1943 0.0129 0.0312 226.8042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0111 0.3855 0.1598 1.9800e- 003 0.0673 1.9800e- 003 0.0693 0.0195 1.8900e- 003 0.0214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 526.0937 526.0937 0.0196 0.0378 537.8352 6.7000e- 003 6.5900e- 003 311.0310 Total 0.1013 0.4432 1.1397 5.0000e- 003 0.4064 3.8100e- 003 0.4102 0.1098 3.5700e- 003 0.1134 1.6800e- 003 0.0920 308.8994 308.89943.0200e- 003 0.3390 1.8300e- 003 0.3409 0.0903Worker 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0000 0.0000 0.4114 1,307.9725 Paving 0.0786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Off-Road 0.4114 1,307.97250.2846 0.2846 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Total 0.7232 6.2357 8.8024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 125.4904 125.4904 2.7200e- 003 2.6800e- 003 126.3564 2.7200e- 003 2.6800e- 003 126.3564 Total 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 1.2300e- 003 0.1453 7.4000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 6.8000e- 004 0.0392 6.8000e- 004 0.0392 125.4904 125.49041.2300e- 003 0.1453 7.4000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385Worker 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0000 0.0000 0.4114 1,307.9725 Paving 0.0786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Off-Road 0.4114 1,307.97250.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Total 0.7232 6.2357 8.8024 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 125.4904 125.4904 2.7200e- 003 2.6800e- 003 126.3564 2.7200e- 003 2.6800e- 003 126.3564 Total 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 1.2300e- 003 0.1377 7.4000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367 6.8000e- 004 0.0374 6.8000e- 004 0.0374 125.4904 125.49041.2300e- 003 0.1377 7.4000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367Worker 35.9722 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.44812.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708Total 36.1639 1.3030 1.8111 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0169 0.0108 0.1837 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 57.9186 57.9186 1.2600e- 003 1.2400e- 003 58.3183 1.2600e- 003 1.2400e- 003 58.3183 Total 0.0169 0.0108 0.1837 5.7000e- 004 0.0671 3.4000e- 004 0.0674 0.0178 3.2000e- 004 0.0181 3.2000e- 004 0.0181 57.9186 57.91865.7000e- 004 0.0671 3.4000e- 004 0.0674 0.0178Worker 35.9722 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.44812.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708Total 36.1639 1.3030 1.8111 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 57.9186 57.91865.7000e- 004 0.0636 3.4000e- 004 0.0639 0.0169Worker0.0169 0.0108 0.1837 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 57.9186 57.9186 1.2600e- 003 1.2400e- 003 58.3183 1.2600e- 003 1.2400e- 003 58.3183 Total 0.0169 0.0108 0.1837 5.7000e- 004 0.0636 3.4000e- 004 0.0639 0.0169 3.2000e- 004 0.0172 3.2000e- 004 0.0172 1,459.1816 1,459.1816 0.0833 0.0563 1,478.0288 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.5859 0.6082 6.0092 0.0142 1.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.0563 1,478.0288 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 0.4098 1,459.1816 1,459.1816 0.08331.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010 8.8400e- 003 Unmitigated 0.5859 0.6082 6.0092 0.0142 Single Family Housing 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 19.20 40.60 86 11 3Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 48.00 19.00 66 28 6City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Parking Lot 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656Enclosed Parking Structure 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000City Park 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000723 0.003942 Single Family Housing 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.20390.0151 0.0151 238.7849 238.78491.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151NaturalGas Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.1871 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Total 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 238.78490.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151Single Family Housing 2029.67 0.0219 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Mitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0151 238.7849 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.00000.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151Single Family Housing 2.02967 0.0219 0.1871 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths 0.0151 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Total 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 238.78490.0796 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 803.4048 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 Unmitigated 2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 0.0279 1.2911 1.2911 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Mitigated1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 595.4495 778.4003 0.8711 0.0108 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0986 0.8908 0.5868 7.7951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.1189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6260 4.6260 4.4800e- 003 4.7380 0.8666 0.0108 798.6667 Landscaping 0.0780 0.0296 2.5678 1.4000e- 004 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 1.2769 1.2769 182.9508 590.8235 773.77430.0277 1.2769 1.2769Hearth CO 0.8711 0.0108 803.4048 Mitigated 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 595.4495 778.40030.0279 1.2911 1.2911Total 2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0986 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx 0.0374 0.0374Hearth0.0542 0.4628 0.1969 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.1189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 4.6260 4.6260 4.4800e- 003 4.7380 0.0113 0.0108 594.3345 Landscaping 0.0780 0.0296 2.5678 1.4000e- 004 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 590.8235 590.82352.9500e- 003 Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Total CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:05 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Woodstoves - per SCAQMD Rule 445 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD rule compliance Energy Mitigation - Construction Phase - Construction Schedule: September 2022-November 2023 Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Residential acreage based on total site acreage. City park = common area open space. Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 Precipitation Freq (Days)30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2023 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 89 City Park 0.25 Acre 0.25 11,042.46 0 Single Family Housing 31.00 Dwelling Unit 0.64 55,800.00 0 Parking Lot 33.00 Space 0.30 13,200.00 0 Enclosed Parking Structure 62.00 Space 0.56 24,800.00 Anaheim Harbor Townhomes Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,890.00 11,042.46 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.06 0.64 tblFleetMix UBUS 3.8500e-004 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,606.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 6.5600e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 7.2300e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 3.9420e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.13 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 6.5220e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 4.8550e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 26.35 27.90 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.55 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 60.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 220.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 6.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 Trips and VMT - Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates based on Trip Gen Memo Area Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.7439 0.2533 4,102.30520.8097 2.2071 0.0000 4,008.2337 4,008.23370.0391 3.2263 0.8660 3.9756 1.51752022 1.8228 20.3883 15.3836 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.7439 0.2533 4,102.3052 Mitigated Construction 0.8097 4.1707 0.0000 4,008.2337 4,008.23370.0391 7.2940 0.8660 8.0433 3.4811Maximum 36.1824 20.3883 15.3836 2,513.4315 2,513.4315 0.4142 0.0383 2,533.8210 0.7439 0.2533 4,102.3052 2023 36.1824 12.1764 13.6888 0.0269 0.4280 0.5183 0.9463 0.1151 0.5004 0.6155 0.0000 0.8097 4.1707 0.0000 4,008.2337 4,008.23370.0391 7.2940 0.8660 8.0433 3.48112022 1.8228 20.3883 15.3836 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 6.74 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 6.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 6.74 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,237.4315 2,420.3822 0.9616 0.0739 2,466.4293 0.0860 0.0586 1,422.8206 Total 2.7907 1.4569 16.3664 0.0427 1.5044 1.3158 2.8201 0.4010 1.3151 1.7161 182.9508 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 1,403.1970 1,403.19700.0136 1.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010Mobile0.5826 0.6535 5.9238 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 0.8711 0.0108 803.4048 Energy 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 595.4495 778.40030.0279 1.2911 1.2911Area2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.96 0.00 45.49 54.75 0.00 41.14 0.00 0.7439 0.2533 4,102.3052 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 0.8097 2.2071 0.0000 4,008.2337 4,008.23370.0391 3.2263 0.8660 3.9756 1.5175Maximum 36.1824 20.3883 15.3836 2,513.4315 2,513.4315 0.4142 0.0383 2,533.82102023 36.1824 12.1764 13.6888 0.0269 0.4064 0.5183 0.9247 0.1098 0.5004 0.6102 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Acres of Paving: 0.86 Residential Indoor: 112,995; Residential Outdoor: 37,665; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,280 OffRoad Equipment 5 10 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 5.63 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 60 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 220 5 Paving Paving 11/3/2023 11/16/2023 5 10 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/30/2022 11/2/2023 5 6 3 Grading Grading 10/7/2022 12/29/2022 5 60 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/6/2022 Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date 88.94 0.00 8.28 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 29.98 8.51 46.43 58.04 0.00 94.21 43.95 0.00 94.25 72.23 100.00 0.00 7.56 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 2,237.4315 2,237.4315 0.1064 0.0739 2,262.0970 0.0860 0.0586 1,422.8206 Total 1.9541 1.3329 8.7682 0.0179 1.5044 0.0762 1.5806 0.4010 0.0756 0.4766 0.0000 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 1,403.1970 1,403.19700.0136 1.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010Mobile0.5826 0.6535 5.9238 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 Energy 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Area1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 Category lb/day lb/day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixBuilding Construction 7 32.00 11.00 0.00 HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 326.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixSite Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 462.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.73 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.5921 2,338.2191 0.5921 2,338.2191 Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 5.0042 0.8379 5.8421 0.7577 0.7829 1.5406 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.0000 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0042 0.0000 5.0042 0.7577 0.0000 0.7577 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixArchitectural Coating 1 6.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.1487 0.2502 1,640.43370.0261 0.1319 1,562.1538 1,562.15380.0138 0.3846 0.0273 0.4118 0.1058Hauling 0.0913 3.7377 1.0250 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.5921 2,338.2191 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.7829 1.1068 0.0000 2,323.4168 2,323.41680.0241 2.1393 0.8379 2.9772 0.3239Total 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 2,323.4168 2,323.4168 0.5921 2,338.2191 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6889 16.6217 13.9605 0.0241 0.8379 0.8379 0.7829 0.7829 0.0000 0.0000 0.3239 0.00002.1393 0.0000 2.1393 0.3239Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,684.8169 1,684.8169 0.1518 0.2533 1,764.0861 3.0800e- 003 3.0600e- 003 123.6524 Total 0.1339 3.7666 1.4231 0.0150 0.5482 0.0281 0.5762 0.1489 0.0268 0.1757 7.2000e- 004 0.0393 122.6631 122.66311.2100e- 003 0.1453 7.8000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385Worker0.0426 0.0289 0.3981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1487 0.2502 1,640.4337 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0261 0.1364 1,562.1538 1,562.15380.0138 0.4029 0.0273 0.4302 0.1103Hauling 0.0913 3.7377 1.0250 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.5389 1,679.6457 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5727 3.5766 1,666.1738 1,666.17380.0172 6.2644 0.6225 6.8870 3.0039Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 1,666.1738 1,666.1738 0.5389 1,679.6457 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 0.0000 3.0039 0.00006.2644 0.0000 6.2644 3.0039Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 1,684.8169 1,684.8169 0.1518 0.2533 1,764.0861 3.0800e- 003 3.0600e- 003 123.6524 Total 0.1339 3.7666 1.4231 0.0150 0.5223 0.0281 0.5503 0.1425 0.0268 0.1693 7.2000e- 004 0.0374 122.6631 122.66311.2100e- 003 0.1377 7.8000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367Worker0.0426 0.0289 0.3981 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1.8900e- 003 1.8800e- 003 76.09384.4000e- 004 0.0230 75.4850 75.48507.4000e- 004 0.0848 4.8000e- 004 0.0852 0.0226Worker0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.5389 1,679.6457 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.5727 1.8569 0.0000 1,666.1738 1,666.17380.0172 2.6780 0.6225 3.3006 1.2842Total 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 1,666.1738 1,666.1738 0.5389 1,679.6457 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3122 14.6277 7.0939 0.0172 0.6225 0.6225 0.5727 0.5727 0.0000 0.0000 1.2842 0.00002.6780 0.0000 2.6780 1.2842Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 75.4850 75.4850 1.8900e- 003 1.8800e- 003 76.0938 1.8900e- 003 1.8800e- 003 76.0938 Total 0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 7.4000e- 004 0.0894 4.8000e- 004 0.0899 0.0237 4.4000e- 004 0.0242 4.4000e- 004 0.0242 75.4850 75.48507.4000e- 004 0.0894 4.8000e- 004 0.0899 0.0237Worker0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 461.7892 461.7892 0.0374 0.0612 480.9624 2.3700e- 003 2.3600e- 003 95.1173 Total 0.0542 0.9014 0.5473 4.1700e- 003 0.2065 7.0100e- 003 0.2136 0.0556 6.7000e- 003 0.0623 5.6000e- 004 0.0302 94.3562 94.35629.3000e- 004 0.1118 6.0000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296Worker0.0328 0.0222 0.3062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0350 0.0589 385.8452 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.1400e- 003 0.0321 367.4330 367.43303.2400e- 003 0.0948 6.4100e- 003 0.1012 0.0260Hauling 0.0215 0.8792 0.2411 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.6454 2,011.6169 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.6829 4.1084 1,995.4825 1,995.48250.0206 7.0875 0.7423 7.8298 3.4255Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 1,995.4825 1,995.4825 0.6454 2,011.6169 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 3.4255 0.00007.0875 0.0000 7.0875 3.4255Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 75.4850 75.4850 1.8900e- 003 1.8800e- 003 76.0938Total 0.0262 0.0178 0.2450 7.4000e- 004 0.0848 4.8000e- 004 0.0852 0.0226 4.4000e- 004 0.0230 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 461.7892 461.7892 0.0374 0.0612 480.9624 2.3700e- 003 2.3600e- 003 95.1173 Total 0.0542 0.9014 0.5473 4.1700e- 003 0.1964 7.0100e- 003 0.2034 0.0531 6.7000e- 003 0.0598 5.6000e- 004 0.0288 94.3562 94.35629.3000e- 004 0.1060 6.0000e- 004 0.1066 0.0282Worker0.0328 0.0222 0.3062 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0350 0.0589 385.8452 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.1400e- 003 0.0310 367.4330 367.43303.2400e- 003 0.0905 6.4100e- 003 0.0969 0.0249Hauling 0.0215 0.8792 0.2411 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.6454 2,011.6169 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.6829 2.1473 0.0000 1,995.4825 1,995.48250.0206 3.0299 0.7423 3.7722 1.4644Total 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 1,995.4825 1,995.4825 0.6454 2,011.6169 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5403 16.9836 9.2202 0.0206 0.7423 0.7423 0.6829 0.6829 0.0000 0.0000 1.4644 0.00003.0299 0.0000 3.0299 1.4644Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction On-Site 530.1048 530.1048 0.0206 0.0403 542.6172 7.5800e- 003 7.5400e- 003 304.3752 Total 0.1229 0.5840 1.1615 5.0500e- 003 0.4280 6.7500e- 003 0.4348 0.1151 6.3900e- 003 0.1215 1.7800e- 003 0.0966 301.9399 301.93992.9700e- 003 0.3577 1.9300e- 003 0.3596 0.0949Worker0.1049 0.0711 0.9800 228.1649 228.1649 0.0131 0.0327 238.2420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0180 0.5129 0.1815 2.0800e- 003 0.0703 4.8200e- 003 0.0752 0.0202 4.6100e- 003 0.0249 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.5429 2,001.5429 0.3486 2,010.2581 0.3486 2,010.2581 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.5689 0.5689 2,001.5429 2,001.54290.0221 0.5889 0.5889Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 530.1048 530.1048 0.0206 0.0403 542.6172 7.5800e- 003 7.5400e- 003 304.3752 Total 0.1229 0.5840 1.1615 5.0500e- 003 0.4064 6.7500e- 003 0.4131 0.1098 6.3900e- 003 0.1162 1.7800e- 003 0.0921 301.9399 301.93992.9700e- 003 0.3390 1.9300e- 003 0.3410 0.0903Worker0.1049 0.0711 0.9800 228.1649 228.1649 0.0131 0.0327 238.2420 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0180 0.5129 0.1815 2.0800e- 003 0.0673 4.8200e- 003 0.0722 0.0195 4.6100e- 003 0.0241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.5429 2,001.5429 0.3486 2,010.2581 0.3486 2,010.2581 Total 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 0.0221 0.5889 0.5889 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 0.5689 0.5689 0.0000 2,001.5429 2,001.54290.0221 0.5889 0.5889Off-Road 1.6487 12.5031 12.7264 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.3399 2,010.28580.4968 0.4968 0.0000 2,001.7877 2,001.78770.0221 0.5145 0.5145Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 511.6438 511.6438 0.0198 0.0383 523.5352 6.8700e- 003 7.0100e- 003 296.3913 Total 0.1093 0.4660 1.0777 4.8500e- 003 0.4280 3.8200e- 003 0.4318 0.1151 3.5800e- 003 0.1187 1.6800e- 003 0.0965 294.1301 294.13012.8700e- 003 0.3577 1.8300e- 003 0.3595 0.0949Worker0.0985 0.0633 0.9128 217.5138 217.5138 0.0129 0.0312 227.1439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0107 0.4027 0.1649 1.9800e- 003 0.0703 1.9900e- 003 0.0723 0.0202 1.9000e- 003 0.0222 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.7877 2,001.7877 0.3399 2,010.2858 0.3399 2,010.2858 Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.4968 0.4968 2,001.7877 2,001.78770.0221 0.5145 0.5145Off-Road 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 Category lb/day lb/day CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.4114 1,307.97250.2846 0.2846 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Total 0.7232 6.2357 8.8024 0.0000 0.0000 0.4114 1,307.9725 Paving 0.0786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Off-Road 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 511.6438 511.6438 0.0198 0.0383 523.5352 6.8700e- 003 7.0100e- 003 296.3913 Total 0.1093 0.4660 1.0777 4.8500e- 003 0.4064 3.8200e- 003 0.4102 0.1098 3.5800e- 003 0.1134 1.6800e- 003 0.0920 294.1301 294.13012.8700e- 003 0.3390 1.8300e- 003 0.3409 0.0903Worker0.0985 0.0633 0.9128 217.5138 217.5138 0.0129 0.0312 227.1439 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0107 0.4027 0.1649 1.9800e- 003 0.0673 1.9900e- 003 0.0693 0.0195 1.9000e- 003 0.0214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2,001.7877 2,001.7877 0.3399 2,010.2858Total 1.5233 11.7104 12.6111 0.0221 0.5145 0.5145 0.4968 0.4968 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.4114 1,307.97250.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Total 0.7232 6.2357 8.8024 0.0000 0.0000 0.4114 1,307.9725 Paving 0.0786 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 1,297.6880 1,297.68800.0136 0.3084 0.3084Off-Road 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 119.4903 119.4903 2.7900e- 003 2.8500e- 003 120.4090 2.7900e- 003 2.8500e- 003 120.4090 Total 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 1.1700e- 003 0.1453 7.4000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 6.8000e- 004 0.0392 6.8000e- 004 0.0392 119.4903 119.49031.1700e- 003 0.1453 7.4000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385Worker0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.44812.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708Total 36.1639 1.3030 1.8111 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 35.9722 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 119.4903 119.4903 2.7900e- 003 2.8500e- 003 120.4090 2.7900e- 003 2.8500e- 003 120.4090 Total 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 1.1700e- 003 0.1377 7.4000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367 6.8000e- 004 0.0374 6.8000e- 004 0.0374 119.4903 119.49031.1700e- 003 0.1377 7.4000e- 004 0.1385 0.0367Worker0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.44812.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708Total 36.1639 1.3030 1.8111 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 35.9722 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 55.1494 55.1494 1.2900e- 003 1.3100e- 003 55.5734 1.2900e- 003 1.3100e- 003 55.5734 Total 0.0185 0.0119 0.1712 5.4000e- 004 0.0671 3.4000e- 004 0.0674 0.0178 3.2000e- 004 0.0181 3.2000e- 004 0.0181 55.1494 55.14945.4000e- 004 0.0671 3.4000e- 004 0.0674 0.0178Worker0.0185 0.0119 0.1712 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Single Family Housing 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0586 1,422.8206 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 0.4098 1,403.1970 1,403.1970 0.08601.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010 8.8400e- 003 Unmitigated 0.5826 0.6535 5.9238 0.0136 1,403.1970 1,403.1970 0.0860 0.0586 1,422.8206 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.5826 0.6535 5.9238 0.0136 1.5044 9.5100e- 003 1.5139 0.4010 8.8400e- 003 0.4098 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 55.1494 55.1494 1.2900e- 003 1.3100e- 003 55.5734 1.2900e- 003 1.3100e- 003 55.5734 Total 0.0185 0.0119 0.1712 5.4000e- 004 0.0636 3.4000e- 004 0.0639 0.0169 3.2000e- 004 0.0172 3.2000e- 004 0.0172 55.1494 55.14945.4000e- 004 0.0636 3.4000e- 004 0.0639 0.0169Worker0.0185 0.0119 0.1712 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.20390.0151 0.0151 238.7849 238.78491.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000City Park 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000723 0.003942 Single Family Housing 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Parking Lot 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656Enclosed Parking Structure 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 48.00 19.00 66 28 6City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Mitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.0151 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Total 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 238.78490.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151Single Family Housing 2029.67 0.0219 0.1871 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 595.4495 778.4003 0.8711 0.0108 803.4048 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 Unmitigated 2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 0.0279 1.2911 1.2911 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Mitigated1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths 0.0151 238.7849 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 238.7849 4.5800e- 003 4.3800e- 003 240.2039 Total 0.0219 0.1871 0.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 238.78490.0796 1.1900e- 003 0.0151 0.0151Single Family Housing 2.02967 0.0219 0.1871 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet 0.0158 0.0108 599.0725 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 0.0516 0.0516 0.0000 595.4495 595.44953.0900e- 003 0.0516 0.0516Total 1.3496 0.4924 2.7648 4.6260 4.6260 4.4800e- 003 4.7380 0.0113 0.0108 594.3345 Landscaping 0.0780 0.0296 2.5678 1.4000e- 004 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 590.8235 590.82352.9500e- 003 0.0374 0.0374Hearth0.0542 0.4628 0.1969 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.1189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0986 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.8711 0.0108 803.4048 Mitigated 1.2911 1.2911 182.9508 595.4495 778.40030.0279 1.2911 1.2911Total 2.1862 0.6163 10.3629 4.6260 4.6260 4.4800e- 003 4.7380 0.8666 0.0108 798.6667 Landscaping 0.0780 0.0296 2.5678 1.4000e- 004 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 0.0142 1.2769 1.2769 182.9508 590.8235 773.77430.0277 1.2769 1.2769Hearth0.8908 0.5868 7.7951 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.1189 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0986 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 3:08 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System Woodstoves - per SCAQMD Rule 445 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD rule compliance Construction Phase - Construction Schedule: September 2022-November 2023 Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Residential acreage based on total site acreage. City park = common area open space. Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 390.98 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.033 Precipitation Freq (Days)30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2023 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 89 City Park 0.25 Acre 0.25 11,042.46 0 Single Family Housing 31.00 Dwelling Unit 0.64 55,800.00 0 Parking Lot 33.00 Space 0.30 13,200.00 0 Enclosed Parking Structure 62.00 Space 0.56 24,800.00 Anaheim Harbor Townhomes Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFleetMix UBUS 3.8500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS 6.5600e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 7.2300e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH 3.9420e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.01 0.00 tblFleetMix MCY 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV 0.13 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 6.5220e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.06 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.19 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 4.8550e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LDA 0.54 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 26.35 27.90 tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.55 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 60.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 220.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 6.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 6 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadMoistureContent 0 12 Trips and VMT - Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation rates based on Trip Gen Memo Area Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Energy Mitigation - Water Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0377 3.9900e- 003 260.1016 Mitigated Construction 0.0566 0.1534 0.0000 258.0193 258.01933.0400e-003 0.2934 0.0587 0.3267 0.1226Maximum0.3626 1.3715 1.5567 258.0193 258.0193 0.0377 3.8300e- 003 260.1016 0.0270 3.9900e- 003 111.0403 2023 0.3626 1.3715 1.5567 3.0400e-003 0.0471 0.0587 0.1058 0.0127 0.0566 0.0693 0.0000 0.0308 0.1534 0.0000 109.1777 109.17771.2000e-003 0.2934 0.0333 0.3267 0.122620220.0709 0.7917 0.4760 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 6.74 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 6.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 6.74 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 0.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 10,890.00 11,042.46 tblLandUse LotAcreage 10.06 0.64 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,606.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Highest 0.6490 0.6490 5 9-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.1476 0.1476 4 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.4527 0.4527 3 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.4530 0.4530 2 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 0.5033 0.5033 1 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 0.6490 0.6490 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.19 0.00 37.94 51.05 0.00 31.02 0.00 0.0377 3.9900e- 003 260.1014 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 0.0566 0.0849 0.0000 258.0191 258.01913.0400e-003 0.1317 0.0587 0.1650 0.0541Maximum0.3626 1.3715 1.5567 258.0191 258.0191 0.0377 3.8300e- 003 260.1014 0.0270 3.9900e- 003 111.0402 2023 0.3626 1.3715 1.5567 3.0400e-003 0.0447 0.0587 0.1034 0.0121 0.0566 0.0687 0.0000 0.0308 0.0849 0.0000 109.1776 109.17761.2000e-003 0.1317 0.0333 0.1650 0.054120220.0709 0.7917 0.4760 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N20 CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 354.1844 358.4027 0.2934 0.0126 369.4861 0.0532 1.3100e-003 8.8718 Total 0.3403 0.1643 1.4240 2.7800e-003 0.2690 6.7300e- 003 0.2757 0.0718 6.6100e- 003 0.0784 4.2182 0.0000 0.0000 0.5126 6.6382 7.15080.0000 0.0000Water 0.0000 3.7056 0.2190 0.0000 9.1805 0.0141 9.7400e-003 237.1520 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.7056 1.6100e- 003 0.0734 0.0000 233.8970 233.89702.5100e-003 0.2690 1.7300e- 003 0.2707 0.0718Mobile0.1037 0.1207 1.0860 106.4249 106.4249 6.4000e- 003 1.4100e-003 107.0049 6.4000e- 004 1.2000e-004 7.2769 Energy 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 2.2000e-004 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003 0.0000 7.2244 7.22445.0000e-005 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003Area0.2326 9.4800e-003 0.3234 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 355.3061 365.4327 0.5353 0.0129 382.6610 0.0665 1.6300e-003 10.5491 Total 0.3508 0.1659 1.5190 3.0900e-003 0.2690 0.0222 0.2912 0.0718 0.0221 0.0939 10.1266 0.0000 0.0000 0.6408 7.7599 8.40060.0000 0.0000Water 0.0000 7.4112 0.4380 0.0000 18.3609 0.0141 9.7400e-003 237.1520 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.4112 1.6100e- 003 0.0734 0.0000 233.8970 233.89702.5100e-003 0.2690 1.7300e- 003 0.2707 0.0718Mobile0.1037 0.1207 1.0860 106.4249 106.4249 6.4000e- 003 1.4100e-003 107.0049 0.0103 1.2000e-004 9.5940 Energy 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 2.2000e-004 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 0.0177 0.0177 2.0746 7.2244 9.29903.6000e-004 0.0177 0.0177Area0.2431 0.0110 0.4184 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.37 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.73 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 Acres of Paving: 0.86 Residential Indoor: 112,995; Residential Outdoor: 37,665; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 2,280 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 10 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 5.63 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 60 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/17/2023 11/30/2023 5 220 5 Paving Paving 11/3/2023 11/16/2023 5 10 4 Building Construction Building Construction 12/30/2022 11/2/2023 5 6 3 Grading Grading 10/7/2022 12/29/2022 5 60 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 9/29/2022 10/6/2022 Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2022 9/28/2022 5 20 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date 45.20 2.48 3.44 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Percent Reduction 2.98 0.93 6.25 10.03 0.00 69.73 5.32 0.00 70.10 16.51 58.35 0.32 1.92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixArchitectural Coating 1 6.00 0.00 0.00 HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixBuilding Construction 7 32.00 11.00 0.00 HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 326.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_MixSite Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 462.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 15.2976 15.2976 1.3800e- 003 2.3000e- 003 16.0167 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1370 Total 1.3200e- 003 0.0381 0.0142 1.5000e-004 5.4000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 5.6700e-003 1.4700e- 003 2.7000e- 004 1.7400e-003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e-004 0.0000 1.1279 1.12791.0000e-005 1.4300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e-003 3.8000e- 004 Worker 3.9000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 4.0700e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3500e- 003 2.2700e- 003 14.8797 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 1.3500e-003 0.0000 14.1697 14.16971.4000e-004 3.9700e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.2400e-003 1.0900e- 003 Hauling 9.3000e- 004 0.0378 0.0102 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e- 003 0.0000 21.2120 5.3700e- 003 0.0000 21.2120 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e-004 0.0500 8.3800e- 003 0.0584 7.5800e- 003 7.8300e- 003 0.0154 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e-004 8.3800e- 003 8.3800e-003 7.8300e- 003 7.8300e-003 0.0000 21.0777 21.0777 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0500 0.0000 0.0500 7.5800e- 003 0.0000 7.5800e-003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 15.2976 15.2976 1.3800e- 003 2.3000e- 003 16.0167 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1370 Total 1.3200e- 003 0.0381 0.0142 1.5000e-004 5.1400e- 003 2.8000e- 004 5.4200e-003 1.4000e- 003 2.7000e- 004 1.6700e-003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e-004 0.0000 1.1279 1.12791.0000e-005 1.3500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3600e-003 3.6000e- 004 Worker 3.9000e- 004 2.9000e- 004 4.0700e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.3500e- 003 2.2700e- 003 14.8797 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 1.3000e-003 0.0000 14.1697 14.16971.4000e-004 3.7900e- 003 2.7000e- 004 4.0600e-003 1.0400e- 003 Hauling 9.3000e- 004 0.0378 0.0102 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 5.3700e- 003 0.0000 21.2119 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 7.8300e- 003 0.0111 0.0000 21.0777 21.07772.4000e-004 0.0214 8.3800e- 003 0.0298 3.2400e- 003 Total 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 21.0777 21.0777 5.3700e- 003 0.0000 21.2119 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0169 0.1662 0.1396 2.4000e-004 8.3800e- 003 8.3800e-003 7.8300e- 003 7.8300e-003 0.0000 0.0000 3.2400e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0214 0.0000 0.0214 3.2400e- 003 Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.2082 0.2082 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2099 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2099 Total 7.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 7.5000e-004 0.0000 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.6000e-004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2082 0.20820.0000 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 2.6000e-004 7.0000e- 005 Worker 7.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 7.5000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.5713 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 1.7200e- 003 0.0107 0.0000 4.5346 4.53465.0000e-005 0.0188 1.8700e- 003 0.0207 9.0100e- 003 Total 3.9400e- 003 0.0439 0.0213 4.5346 4.5346 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.5713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9400e- 003 0.0439 0.0213 5.0000e-005 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e-003 1.7200e- 003 1.7200e-003 0.0000 0.0000 9.0100e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0188 0.0000 0.0188 9.0100e- 003 Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.2082 0.2082 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2099 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2099 Total 7.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 7.5000e-004 0.0000 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.5000e-004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2082 0.20820.0000 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.5000e-004 7.0000e- 005 Worker 7.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 7.5000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.5712 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 1.7200e- 003 5.5700e-003 0.0000 4.5346 4.53465.0000e-005 8.0300e- 003 1.8700e- 003 9.9000e-003 3.8500e- 003 Total 3.9400e- 003 0.0439 0.0213 4.5346 4.5346 1.4700e- 003 0.0000 4.5712 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.9400e- 003 0.0439 0.0213 5.0000e-005 1.8700e- 003 1.8700e-003 1.7200e- 003 1.7200e-003 0.0000 0.0000 3.8500e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.00008.0300e- 003 0.0000 8.0300e-003 3.8500e- 003 Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 12.6014 12.6014 1.0100e- 003 1.6700e- 003 13.1234 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.6238 Total 1.5500e- 003 0.0274 0.0166 1.3000e-004 6.0900e- 003 2.1000e- 004 6.3000e-003 1.6400e- 003 2.0000e- 004 1.8400e-003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 8.9000e-004 0.0000 2.6029 2.60293.0000e-005 3.2900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.3100e-003 8.7000e- 004 Worker 9.0000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 9.4000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 003 10.4996 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 9.5000e-004 0.0000 9.9985 9.99851.0000e-004 2.8000e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.9900e-003 7.7000e- 004 Hauling 6.5000e- 004 0.0267 7.1700e-003 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0176 0.0000 54.7473 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0205 0.1233 0.0000 54.3081 54.30816.2000e-004 0.2126 0.0223 0.2349 0.1028Total0.0462 0.5095 0.2766 54.3081 54.3081 0.0176 0.0000 54.7473 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0462 0.5095 0.2766 6.2000e-004 0.0223 0.0223 0.0205 0.0205 0.0000 0.0000 0.1028 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.2126 0.0000 0.2126 0.1028Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 12.6014 12.6014 1.0100e- 003 1.6700e- 003 13.1234 6.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.6238 Total 1.5500e- 003 0.0274 0.0166 1.3000e-004 5.7900e- 003 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e-003 1.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 004 1.7700e-003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 8.5000e-004 0.0000 2.6029 2.60293.0000e-005 3.1200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1400e-003 8.3000e- 004 Worker 9.0000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 9.4000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 003 10.4996 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 9.2000e-004 0.0000 9.9985 9.99851.0000e-004 2.6700e- 003 1.9000e- 004 2.8600e-003 7.4000e- 004 Hauling 6.5000e- 004 0.0267 7.1700e-003 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0176 0.0000 54.7472 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0.0205 0.0644 0.0000 54.3081 54.30816.2000e-004 0.0909 0.0223 0.1132 0.0439Total0.0462 0.5095 0.2766 54.3081 54.3081 0.0176 0.0000 54.7472 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0462 0.5095 0.2766 6.2000e-004 0.0223 0.0223 0.0205 0.0205 0.0000 0.0000 0.0439 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0909 0.0000 0.0909 0.0439Fugitive Dust N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.2423 0.2423 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2480 0.0000 0.0000 0.1399 Total 6.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 5.9000e-004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.2000e-004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.1388 0.13880.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e-004 5.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.0000e-004 0.1035 0.1035 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.1081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 9.0000e-005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.9079 0.9079 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.9118 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.9118 Total 8.2000e- 004 6.2500e- 003 6.3600e-003 1.0000e-005 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e-004 2.8000e- 004 2.8000e-004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 2.8000e-004 0.0000 0.9079 0.90791.0000e-005 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e-004Off-Road 8.2000e- 004 6.2500e- 003 6.3600e-003 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 0.2423 0.2423 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2480 0.0000 0.0000 0.1399 Total 6.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 5.9000e-004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e-004 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e-005 0.0000 0.1388 0.13880.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e-004 4.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 5.0000e-004 0.1035 0.1035 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.1081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 9.0000e-005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e-005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.9079 0.9079 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.9118 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.9118 Total 8.2000e- 004 6.2500e- 003 6.3600e-003 1.0000e-005 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e-004 2.8000e- 004 2.8000e-004 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 2.8000e-004 0.0000 0.9079 0.90791.0000e-005 2.9000e- 004 2.9000e-004Off-Road 8.2000e- 004 6.2500e- 003 6.3600e-003 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction On-Site 51.2025 51.2025 1.9600e- 003 3.8100e- 003 52.3860 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 29.8413 Total 0.0111 0.0513 0.1200 5.4000e-004 0.0461 4.2000e- 004 0.0465 0.0124 3.9000e- 004 0.0128 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 0.0104 0.0000 29.6138 29.61383.2000e-004 0.0385 2.0000e- 004 0.0387 0.0102Worker9.9000e- 003 7.0800e- 003 0.1022 21.5887 21.5887 1.2800e- 003 3.1000e- 003 22.5446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1900e- 003 0.0442 0.0178 2.2000e-004 7.5900e- 003 2.2000e- 004 7.8100e-003 2.1900e- 003 2.1000e- 004 2.4000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 198.8510 198.8510 0.0338 0.0000 199.6952 0.0338 0.0000 199.6952 Total 0.1668 1.2823 1.3809 2.4200e-003 0.0563 0.0563 0.0544 0.0544 0.0000 0.0544 0.0544 0.0000 198.8510 198.85102.4200e-003 0.0563 0.0563Off-Road 0.1668 1.2823 1.3809 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 51.2025 51.2025 1.9600e- 003 3.8100e- 003 52.3860 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 29.8413 Total 0.0111 0.0513 0.1200 5.4000e-004 0.0437 4.2000e- 004 0.0442 0.0118 3.9000e- 004 0.0122 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 9.9100e-003 0.0000 29.6138 29.61383.2000e-004 0.0365 2.0000e- 004 0.0367 9.7200e- 003 Worker 9.9000e- 003 7.0800e- 003 0.1022 21.5887 21.5887 1.2800e- 003 3.1000e- 003 22.5446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1900e- 003 0.0442 0.0178 2.2000e-004 7.2700e- 003 2.2000e- 004 7.4800e-003 2.1100e- 003 2.1000e- 004 2.3200e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 198.8508 198.8508 0.0338 0.0000 199.6950 0.0338 0.0000 199.6950 Total 0.1668 1.2823 1.3809 2.4200e-003 0.0563 0.0563 0.0544 0.0544 0.0000 0.0544 0.0544 0.0000 198.8508 198.85082.4200e-003 0.0563 0.0563Off-Road 0.1668 1.2823 1.3809 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.5493 0.5493 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5536 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5536 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.9000e-003 1.0000e-005 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.2000e-004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 1.9000e-004 0.0000 0.5493 0.54931.0000e-005 7.1000e- 004 0.0000 7.2000e-004 1.9000e- 004 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.9000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 5.9329 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e-003 0.0000 5.8862 5.88627.0000e-005 1.5400e- 003 1.5400e-003Total3.6100e- 003 0.0312 0.0440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 5.9329 Paving 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e-003 0.0000 5.8862 5.88627.0000e-005 1.5400e- 003 1.5400e-003Off-Road 3.2200e- 003 0.0312 0.0440 Category tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.5493 0.5493 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5536 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5536 Total 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.9000e-003 1.0000e-005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e-004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e-004 0.0000 0.5493 0.54931.0000e-005 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e-004 1.8000e- 004 Worker 1.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.9000e-003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 5.9329 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e-003 0.0000 5.8862 5.88627.0000e-005 1.5400e- 003 1.5400e-003Total3.6100e- 003 0.0312 0.0440 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8700e- 003 0.0000 5.9329 Paving 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e-003 0.0000 5.8862 5.88627.0000e-005 1.5400e- 003 1.5400e-003Off-Road 3.2200e- 003 0.0312 0.0440 Category tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied N2O CO2ePM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.2535 0.2535 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2555 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2555 Total 8.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e-004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e-004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2535 0.25350.0000 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e-004 9.0000e- 005 Worker 8.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2785 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 0.0000 1.2766 1.27661.0000e-005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004Total0.1808 6.5100e- 003 9.0600e-003 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2785 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.6000e- 004 6.5100e- 003 9.0600e-003 1.0000e-005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.1799 Category tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 0.2535 0.2535 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2555 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2555 Total 8.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e-004 0.0000 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.1000e-004 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e-005 0.0000 0.0000 8.0000e-005 0.0000 0.2535 0.25350.0000 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 3.1000e-004 8.0000e- 005 Worker 8.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 8.8000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2785 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 0.0000 1.2766 1.27661.0000e-005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004Total0.1808 6.5100e- 003 9.0600e-003 1.2766 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2785 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.6000e- 004 6.5100e- 003 9.0600e-003 1.0000e-005 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e-004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.1799 Category tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.0039420.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656Enclosed Parking Structure 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHMDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 48.00 19.00 66 28 6City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3Single Family Housing 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0Enclosed Parking Structure 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-byLand Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Total 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Single Family Housing 208.94 208.94 208.94 713,980 713,980 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0141 9.7400e-003 237.1520 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated 237.1520 Unmitigated 0.1037 0.1207 1.0860 2.5100e-003 0.2690 1.7300e- 003 0.2707 0.0718 1.6100e- 003 0.0734 0.0000 233.8970 233.8970 0.0000 233.8970 233.8970 0.0141 9.7400e-003 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1037 0.1207 1.0860 2.5100e-003 0.2690 1.7300e- 003 0.2707 0.0718 1.6100e- 003 0.0734 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OExhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CH4 N2O CO2eExhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 39.5335 39.5335 7.6000e- 004 7.2000e-004 39.7685 7.6000e- 004 7.2000e-004 39.7685 NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 2.2000e-004 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 39.5335 39.53352.2000e-004 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003NaturalGas Mitigated 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 66.8913 66.8913 5.6500e- 003 6.8000e-004 67.2364 5.6500e- 003 6.8000e-004 67.2364 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 66.8913 66.89130.0000 0.0000Electricity Mitigated N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000City Park 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000723 0.003942 Single Family Housing 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 0.000723 0.003942 Parking Lot 0.544795 0.058861 0.186903 0.129401 0.024381 0.006522 0.014242 0.004855 0.000656 0.000385 0.024332 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 7.2000e- 004 39.7685 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated 2.7600e-003 0.0000 39.5335 39.5335 7.6000e-004 39.5335 7.6000e-004 7.2000e- 004 39.7685 Total 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 2.2000e- 004 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 39.53350.0145 2.2000e- 004 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 Single Family Housing 740830 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 7.2000e- 004 39.7685 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2.7600e-003 0.0000 39.5335 39.5335 7.6000e-004 39.5335 7.6000e-004 7.2000e- 004 39.7685 Total 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0145 2.2000e- 004 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e- 003 2.7600e-003 0.0000 39.53350.0145 2.2000e- 004 2.7600e-003 2.7600e- 003 Single Family Housing 740830 3.9900e- 003 0.0341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4.4000e-004 43.2033 Total 66.8913 5.6500e-003 6.9000e-004 67.2364 Single Family Housing 242361 42.9816 3.6300e-003 2.4000e-004 23.2095 Parking Lot 4620 0.8193 7.0000e-005 1.0000e-005 0.8236 Enclosed Parking Structure 130200 23.0904 1.9500e-003 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 4.4000e-004 43.2033 Total 66.8913 5.6500e-003 6.9000e-004 67.2364 Single Family Housing 242361 42.9816 3.6300e-003 2.4000e-004 23.2095 Parking Lot 4620 0.8193 7.0000e-005 1.0000e-005 0.8236 Enclosed Parking Structure 130200 23.0904 1.9500e-003 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0180 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0103 1.2000e-004 9.5940 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated 0.0177 0.0177 2.0746 7.2244 9.29903.6000e-004 0.0177 0.0177Unmitigated0.2431 0.0110 0.4184 7.2244 7.2244 6.4000e- 004 1.2000e-004 7.2769 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2326 9.4800e-003 0.3234 5.0000e-005 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Use only Natural Gas Hearths ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet 6.4000e- 004 1.2000e-004 7.2769 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003 0.0000 7.2244 7.22446.0000e-005 2.2400e- 003 2.2400e-003Total0.2326 9.4900e-003 0.3234 0.5246 0.5246 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.5373 1.3000e- 004 1.2000e-004 6.7396 Landscaping 9.7500e- 003 3.7000e-003 0.3210 2.0000e-005 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e-003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e-003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 4.7000e-004 0.0000 6.6998 6.69984.0000e-005 4.7000e- 004 4.7000e-004Hearth6.8000e- 004 5.7900e-003 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.2042 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0180 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2SO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 ROG NOx CO 0.0103 1.2000e-004 9.5940 Mitigated 0.0177 0.0177 2.0746 7.2244 9.29903.7000e-004 0.0177 0.0177Total0.2431 0.0110 0.4184 0.5246 0.5246 5.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.5373 9.8300e- 003 1.2000e-004 9.0567 Landscaping 9.7500e- 003 3.7000e-003 0.3210 2.0000e-005 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e-003 1.7700e- 003 1.7700e-003 0.0000 0.0160 0.0160 2.0746 6.6998 8.77453.5000e-004 0.0160 0.0160Hearth0.0111 7.3300e-003 0.0974 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1.6300e-003 9.9592 Total 8.4006 0.0665 1.6400e-003 10.5491 Single Family Housing 2.01977 / 1.27334 7.8137 0.0664 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr City Park 0 / 0.29787 0.5869 5.0000e-005 1.0000e-005 0.5899 10.5491 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 8.4006 0.0665 1.6300e- 003 CO2e Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 7.1508 0.0532 1.3100e- 003 8.8718 Total CO2 CH4 N2O Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 1.3100e-003 8.3179 Total 7.1508 0.0532 1.3200e-003 8.8718 Single Family Housing 1.61582 / 1.19566 6.5997 0.0532 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr City Park 0 / 0.2797 0.5511 5.0000e-005 1.0000e-005 0.5539 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 18.3509 Total 7.4112 0.4380 0.0000 18.3609 Single Family Housing 36.49 7.4071 0.4378 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr City Park 0.02 4.0600e- 003 2.4000e-004 0.0000 0.0101 18.3609 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 7.4112 0.4380 0.0000 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 3.7056 0.2190 0.0000 9.1805 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1 Date: 2/1/2022 2:43 PM Anaheim Harbor Townhomes - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year 0.0000 9.1754 Total 3.7056 0.2190 0.0000 9.1805 Single Family Housing 18.245 3.7036 0.2189 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr City Park 0.01 2.0300e- 003 1.2000e-004 0.0000 5.0300e- 003 Attachment D Water Quality 3/2/2022, 11:50:45 AM ANAH-OTH2021-01384 Naiim Khoury Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave - RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Table of Contents CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page iii Contents Page No. Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance ........... 1 Section II Project Description .................................................................................. 2 Section III Site Description ....................................................................................... 9 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) ...................................................... 14 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ................................. 31 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) .......................................................................... 36 Section VII Educational Materials ............................................................................ 37 Attachments Attachment A .......................................................................... TGD Worksheets & Figures Attachment B ........................................................................... Preliminary WQMP Exhibit Attachment C ..................................................................................................... Site BMPs Attachment D ....................................................................................... Reference Material Attachment E ................................................................... Operations & Maintenance Plan Attachment F .......................Geotechnical Report & Additional Infiltration Testing Letter Attachment G ............................................................. Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Attachment H ................................................... 2-Year 24-Hour Storm Event Calculations Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section I CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 1 Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Project Infomation Permit/Application No. (If applicable) DEV2021- 00023 OTH2021-01384 Grading Permit No. & RCP No. TBD Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section I CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 2 Gabriel River Estuary) Chlordane, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Total DDT (sum of 4,4’ – and 2,4’ – isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD), Toxicity (San Pedro Bay Near/ Off Shore Zones Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM Home Building, LLC CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 3 Section II Project Description II.1 Project Description Description of Proposed Project Development Category (From Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or -3): The priority project development categories that apply to this development are as follows: All significant redevelopment projects, where significant redevelopment is defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site. Redevelopment does not include routine maintenance activities that are conducted to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, original purpose of the facility, or emergency redevelopment activity required to protect public health and safety. If the redevelopment results in the addition or replacement of less than 50 percent of the impervious area on-site and the existing development was not subject to WQMP requirement, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 7.II-2.0 only applies to the addition or replacement area. If the addition or replacement accounts for 50 percent or more of the impervious area, the Project WQMP requirements apply to the entire development. Parking lots 5,000 square feet or more including associated drive aisle, and potentially exposed to urban stormwater runoff. A parking lot is defined as a land area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally, for business, or for commerce Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM Home Building, LLC CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 4 Drainage Patterns/Connections The proposed residential development will consist of 1.75 acres. The existing site is relatively flat. The elevation of the existing site ranges from approximately 155.3’ to 152.5’ above mean sea level. In the current condition, the site runoff is split as it surface flows overland in the easterly direction towards the public right-of-way at Harbor Blvd and the southerly direction towards the public right-of-way at W. Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Harbor Blvd flows south and then west on Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Victor Avenue flows west through catch basins and into the Carbon Creek Channel at La Palma Avenue. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. Refer to Attachment D of this report for a copy of the OCFCD Drainage Facilities Maps. The proposed project will be designed to match existing historical drainage conditions via surface flow. The drainage system will be designed to collect and convey stormwater runoff to the proposed treatment systems at the south west corner and the northeast corner of the site prior to discharge into the public right- of way on Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue. All existing onsite storm drain connections, piping, and inlets will be demolished and capped at the right-of-way as part of this development’s construction. Refer to Attachment B of this report for the Preliminary WQMP Exhibit. *Note that the project area excludes the proposed 25.25’ right-of-way dedication along Harbor Blvd. The dedication area consists of approximately 4,723 square feet. The project area excludes the 9’ right- of-way dedication along Victor Avenue which consists of approximately 1,119 square feet. The project area excludes the 12’ right-of-way dedication along Romneya Drive which accounts for approximately 225 square feet. In lieu of providing water quality treatment of these areas as part of the proposed development, City Ventures will pay a fee to support future, public water quality improvements within this dedication area **Post-Project perviousness was assumed to be 100% to produce a conservative value for preliminary design. During final engineering, actual pervious coverage will be calculated as landscape plans become available. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM Home Building, LLC CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 5 Narrative Project Description: (Use as much space as necessary.) The proposed 1.75-acre site is currently occupied by three commercial buildings, planters, and asphalt concrete parking/drive aisles. Existing landscaped areas amount to approximately 6% pervious coverage within this area. Perimeter walls are located along the western property line and northern property line as well as the interior eastern property line. Perimeter fencing is along the interior southern property line. The proposed residential development will consist of six (6) 3-story, multi-family residential buildings which will consist of 31 total units over approximately 1.75 acres. There is a 25.25’ wide right-of-way dedication to the city of Anaheim along the project frontage on N. Harbor Boulevard and a 12’ right-of-way dedication along the project frontage on W. Victor Avenue. This accounts for the difference between the pre-developed site area and the post developed site area. Units will consist of 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom layouts and will range in between 1,002 and 1,814 square feet. The 25.25’ right of way dedication along N. Harbor Boulevard will consist of various landscape improvements. The proposed parkway culvert will extend from the new Right of way boundary to the existing face of curb. The right of way dedication along Victor Avenue will consist of a new parkway and landscape and a sidewalk. Associated parking areas will consist of 62 private garage spaces, 25 open stalls, and 2 ADA stalls. In addition, the residential development will include a private drive aisle, recreational areas, sidewalks, and landscaped open-space areas. The drive aisle will be asphalt concrete pavement and sidewalks will be Portland cement concrete (PCC). Landscaped areas are assumed to amount to approximately 20% pervious coverage. During final engineering, actual project perviousness will be calculated. Best Management Practice (BMP) selection for treatment of stormwater has been described in Section IV of this report. Implementation of BMPs will address the pollutants of concern associated with multi-family residential development. The project will be serviced by onsite private water system and onsite private sanitary sewer system that will be maintained by a homeowner’s association. The proposed private water system will have four points of connection to the existing City maintained water line within Harbor Boulevard (2 for domestic, 1 for irrigation, and 1 for fire). The domestic water line will create a looped system and will have a point of connection to the water main located in W. Victor Avenue. The proposed public sewer system will be gravity fed to one of point connection to an existing public City 6” sewer main located within W. Victor Avenue. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor/ 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM Home Building, LLC CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 6 Long-term maintenance is planned to be handled by a Homeowner’s Association appointed by City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC. Refer to Attachment B of this report for a copy of the Preliminary WQMP Exhibit. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section II CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 7 II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Pollutants of Concern Pollutant Check One for each: E=Expected to be of concern N=Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended-Solid/ Sediment E N Expected by proposed landscaped areas. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section II CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 8 II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern No – Calculations shown below Yes – The site is in a susceptible area but the post development flows do not exceed the pre development flows. Per the TGD Figure 1, Susceptibility Analysis of San Gabriel-Coyote Creek dated February 2013, the project site is indicated as a potential area of erosion, habitat, and physical structure susceptibility. The project site indirectly drains to the San Gabriel River. The Post Development volume for the 2-year 24-hour storm event does not exceed the Pre- development volume for the 2-year 24-hour storm event by more than 5%. Per Section 5.3.1 of the Technical Guidance Document, the following calculation was developed: Volume to Harbor Blvd (V2‐year, post/ V2‐year, pre) ≤ 1.05 (1,650 cf / 4,006 cf) = 0.41 ≤ 1.05 √ Acceptable Volume to Victor Ave (V2‐year, post/ V2‐year, pre) ≤ 1.05 (7,974 cf / 8,271 cf) =0.96 ≤ 1.05 √ Acceptable * See HCOC Calculations in Appendix H Time of Concentration to Harbor Blvd (Tc2‐year, post/ Tc2‐year, pre) ≥ 1.05 Pre-Development Tc= 7.5 min Post Development Tc= 4.25 min (4.25 min / 7.5 min) = 0.56 ≥ 1.05 X Not Acceptable Time of Concentration to Victor Avenue (Tc2‐year, post/ Tc2‐year, pre) ≥ 1.05 Pre-Development Tc= 8.5 min Post Development Tc= 10.0 min (10.00 min / 8.5 min) = 1.18 ≥ 1.05 √ Acceptable** Flow Rate to Harbor Blvd (Q2‐year, post/ Q2‐year, pre) ≤ 1.05 (0.64cfs / 0.83 cfs) = 0.77 ≤ 1.05 √ Acceptable Flow Rate to Victor Ave (Q2‐year, post/ Q2‐year, pre) ≤ 1.05 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section II CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 9 (1.85cfs / 1.89cfs) =0.98 ≤ 1.05 √ Acceptable * Reference Nomograph sheet for pre and post conditions in Attachment H for time of concentration information for the 2‐year storm event. Hydrologic Conditions of Concern will not be considered for this project because although the proposed Time of Concentration of a portion of the site does not follow the required criteria of the Technical Guidance Document and Model WQMP, the post development flow rates and the post development volumes for the site as a whole do not exceed the pre development values. **According to Footnote 8 of the Technical Guidance Document, increases in Tc of more than 5% would be acceptable. II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Post–development drainage will be consistent with a proposed attached Multi-Family Residential project. The tributary areas and direction of run-off flows for the proposed site are delineated on the attached Preliminary WQMP Exhibit based on the grading and drainage design. Refer to the Preliminary WQMP Exhibit in Attachment B of this report. In the current condition, the site runoff is split as it sheet flows overland in the easterly direction towards the public right-of-way at Harbor Blvd and the southerly direction towards the public right-of-way at W. Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Harbor Blvd flows south and then west on Victor Avenue. Stormwater entering Victor Avenue flows west and through catch basins and into the Carbon Creek Channel at La Palma Avenue. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. Proposed drainage runoff will be collected by a series of area drains and by two (2) proposed sump Modular Wetlands Systems (MWS) Biofiltration Curb Inlet systems within the proposed private drive aisle. Water quality flows will be treated via the proposed biofiltration system and discharge through proposed parkways drains via a stormwater sump pump system. Larger storm event flows will enter the Modular Wetlands Systems and flow through the internal bypass and discharge into the public right of way on Victor Avenue and Harbor Boulevard via parkway drains. The proposed drainage pattern matches the existing historical drainage pattern from the site. Runoff from this area historically flows in the westerly direction and ultimately enters Carbon Creek Channel which flows in the southeasterly direction towards the Pacific Ocean. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section II CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 10 II.5 Property Ownership/Management The property is currently owned by City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC. The Owner will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the project’s storm water facilities and conformance to this WQMP after construction is complete. A Notice of Transfer of Responsibility is located in Attachment G of this report and should be executed as part of any ownership transfer after construction is complete. City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC will appoint a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) to provide long term BMP maintenance for the proposed development. Refer to Section V of this report for additional information. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 11 Section III Site Description III.1 Physical Setting Name of Planned Community/Planning Area (if applicable) City of Anaheim Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 12 III.2 Site Characteristics Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone The site falls under the 0.9” per the TGD, Figure XVI-1, Rainfall Zones map. Refer to Attachment A of this report for a copy of the map. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 13 potential (0≤EI≤50, Appendix C) when tested per ASTM D: 482” Refer to Attachment F of this report for a copy of the geotechnical report. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 14 Refer to Attachment F of this report for a copy of the referenced geotechnical recommendations. The North Basin Groundwater Plume is directly north of the site. Exact boundaries of the plume are unknown. Infiltration is infeasible for this site due to the proximity to the plume. See Figure XVI-2f in Appendix A for site proximity to the North Basin Groundwater Plume. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 15 III.3 Watershed Description Receiving Waters Site runoff drains towards the surrounding rights-of-way of the site and enters the existing Carbon Creek Channel. Carbon Creek Channel conveys all site runoff in the southwesterly direction and converges with Coyote Creek which drains to San Gabriel River and eventually the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. The site is located within the San Gabriel-Coyote Creek Watershed. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave – RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section III CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 16 Indicator Bacteria, Iron, Malathion, Toxicity, pH (Coyote Creek) Temperature, water, pH (San Gabriel River Reach 1 (Estuary to Firestone)) Copper, Dioxin, Indicator Bacteria, Nickel, Oxygen (Dissolved) (San Gabriel River Estuary) Chlordane, PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls), Total DDT (sum of 4,4’ – and 2,4’ – isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD), Toxicity (San Pedro Bay Near/ Off Shore Zones Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 17 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis? YES NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. There are currently no approved WIHMPs for the Santa Ana Region. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 18 Project Performance Criteria If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification control performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) Per 7.II‐2.4.2.2 of the MWQMP, HCOCs exist when the post‐construction time of concentration decreases beyond 5% of a 2‐year storm event and volume of storm water increases beyond 5% of a 2‐year storm event thus potentially increasing the downstream erosion and adversely impacts on physical structure, aquatic, and riparian habitat. However, a site that infiltrates at least the runoff from a two‐year storm event does not have an HCOC. If the excess volume cannot feasibly be retained, then retain the excess volume from the two‐year runoff event to the maximum extent possible and implement on‐site hydromodification controls such that post development runoff two‐year peak flow rate is not greater than 110 percent of the predevelopment runoff two‐year peak flow rate. Since the project does not increase the volume for the 2-year storm event nor does the project increase the flowrate for the 2-year storm event, the project will not contribute to erosion of downstream drainage facilities and HCOC’s do not exist for the proposed development. Volume and flow rate calculations of the pre and post development quantities for the 2-year 24 hour storm are presented in Appendix H. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 19 Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project. Biotreatment BMPs will be utilized for the required treatment flow rate The proposed project residential site will generate a total DCV of 5,145 cf. DMA 1 will generate 882 cf and DMA 2 will generate 4,263 cf. The DCV for the DMAs was calculated as follows: DMA 1: Vdesign = 0.9*0.9 inches*0.30 acres*43,560 (sf/acre)*(1 foot/12 inches) = 882 cf DMA 2: Vdesign = 0.9*0.9 inches*1.45 acres*43,560 (sf/acre)*(1 foot/12 inches) = 4,263 cf Due to infiltration being infeasible at the site, biofiltration vaults will treat the required water quality design flow rate. The site will generate a total water quality design flowrate of 0.41 cfs DMA 1: Qdesign = 0.90*0.26 (in/hr)*0.30 acres = 0.07 cfs DMA 2: Qdesign = 0.90*0.26 (in/hr)*1.45 acres = 0.34 cfs See Attachment A of this report for DCV and treatment flow rate calculations. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 20 IV.2. Site Design and Drainage The site proposes two (2) Drainage Management Areas as indicated on the Preliminary WQMP Exhibit. The DMAs are based on the Preliminary Grading and Drainage design. The DMAs will have area drain systems to collect and convey runoff from landscape, surface, and roof drainage to the proposed treatment devices. Pervious coverages located throughout the site will promote impervious area dispersion from roof and sidewalk runoff. Street/ parking lot surface runoff will be collected and conveyed via concrete gutters to proposed Modular Wetlands System (MWS), Biofiltration curb inlets for water quality treatment. An onsite area drain system will connect directly to the MWS Biofiltration systems for treatment of landscaped areas. Treated runoff will be discharged through a proposed parkway drain via the stormwater sump pump systems. Overflow during large storm events will be conveyed through the Biofiltration system and internal bypass to the proposed parkway drain to the public right-of- way on N. Harbor Blvd. or W. Victor Avenue. The Modular Wetland System (MWS) Biofiltration vaults are designed to provide a 3-phase treatment train. Initially, when the stormwater enters the system, a trash rack, filter media and settling chamber will capture large trash/ debris and sediment in the stormwater before entering the planting media. This system is designed to treat stormwater flow horizontally. Before the stormwater enters the planting or “wetland” chamber, the runoff flows through the 2nd phase, a pre-filter cartridge which captures fines TSS, metals, nutrients and bacteria. The pre-filter chamber eliminates additional maintenance of the planting area. The wetland chamber is the 3rd phase of the system which provides final treatment through a combination of physical, chemical and biological processes. Refer to Section IV.3.4 of this report for sizing information of the Biofiltration Vault. Refer to the Preliminary WQMP Exhibit in Attachment B for the location of the proposed BMPs. Refer to Attachment C for manufacturer’s specifications of the selected BMPs. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 21 IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) The full Design Capture Volume (DCV) is being treated with LID BMPs, therefore HSCs are not proposed. Name Included? Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: * The entire DCV will be treated with an LID BMP, therefore HSC BMPs are not required. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 22 IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Name Included? Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: Infiltration BMPs will not be utilized and have been determined to be infeasible for this site due to the close proximity to the North Basin Groundwater Plume. Biotreatment BMPs will be utilized to provide the required treatment flow rates. Refer to Table 2.7 Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet located within Attachment A for additional information. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 23 IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other: Other: Other: Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs will not be utilized and have been determined to be infeasible for this site due to development type, density and available amount of landscaped area for irrigation purposes. Refer to Worksheet J for feasibility calculations within Attachment A of this report. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 24 IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other: Modular Wetland System (MWS) Biofiltration vaults will be utilized to treat the design capture volume using the treatment flow rate method per the Orange County Technical Guidance Document worksheets. The MWS Biofiltration vaults utilize a 3-phase treatment train by collecting the stormwater runoff in a Pre- Treatment Chamber, Planting or “Wetland” Chamber and Discharge Chamber. Treated storm water runoff will be pumped and discharged into proposed parkway drains on N. Harbor Boulevard and W. Victor Avenue at flow rates that do not exceed pre development flow rates. DMA Acreage Tributary to Proposed Catch Basins (ac) Required Treatment Flow Rate, Q (cfs) MWS Model Treatment Capacity, Q (cfs) 1 0.3 0.07 MWS-L-4-6-C 0.073 2 1.45 0.34 MWS-L-8-12-C 0.346 * Project-specific details will be provided during final engineering. Refer to Attachment C for additional manufacturer information. Conclusion: The utilization of a curb inlet MWS Biofiltration at two (2) sump locations will provide more than the required pre-treatment flow rate for the tributary drainage area. N/E Coordinates of Modular Wetlands Systems: DMA 1 Modular Wetland System: 6053276.7155E, 2257072.324N DMA 2 Modular Wetland System 6052992.8178E, 2256838.5313N Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 25 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description n/a n/a IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Not Applicable for this project. IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) Device The proposed onsite catch basins in DMAs 1 and 2 will be equipped with a Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) device sized for the 1-year 1-hour storm event Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 26 IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants N2 Activity Restrictions Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 27 N1: Education for Property Owners, Tenants & Occupants Project conditions of approval will require that the Homeowner’s Association (HOA) periodically provide environmental awarness education materials, made available by the municipalities, to all of its members. Among other things, these materials will be descrive the use of chemcials (including household type) that should be limited to the property, with no discharge of wastes via hosing or other direct discharge to gutters, catch basins and storm drains. Educational materials available from the County of Orange can be downloaded here: http://www.ocwatersheds.com/PublicEd/resources/default.aspx N2: Activity Restrictions Conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs) must be prepared by the developer for the appointed HOA for the purpose of surface water quality protection. The CC&Rs shall incorporate the restrictions based on the Project WQMP. N3: Common Area Landscape Management All common landscaping and/ or open space areas shall have on-going landscape maintenance by an appointed professional landscaping maintenance company as selected by the HOA. Maintenance shall incorporate all current County Water Conservation Resolution usage and follow the Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers per the DAMP Section 5.5. Refer to Section 5 of this report for additional landscape maintenance requirements. N4: BMP Maintenance Refer to Section 5 and Attachment E of this report for additional non-structural BMP maintenance requirements, responsibility and frequency. N5: Title 22 CCR Compliance HOA is responsible for compliance with Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR) and relevant sections of the California Health & Safety Code regarding hazardous waste management is enforced by the County Environmental Heath and behalf of the State. Information regarding hazardous waste management must be provided to all employees, homeowners, tenants and occupants. N9: Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance HOA is responsible for compliance with the local agencies’ ordinances enforced by City Fire Department for the management of hazardous materials including enforcement, waste handling, disposal regulations and documentation. N10: Uniform Fire Code Implementation HOA is responsible for compliance with Article 80 of the Uniform Fire Code enforced by the local fire protection agency. N11: Common Area Litter Control HOA to implement trash management and litter control procedures in the common areas aimed at reducing pollution of drainage water. HOA to contract with landscape maintenance company to provide this service during regularly scheduled maintenance, which will consist of litter patrol, Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 28 emptying of trash receptacles in common areas, and noting trash disposals violations by homeowners, tenants or occupants and reporting the violations to the HOA for investigation. N12: Employee Training HOA to provide Educational Materials and Property Management manuals to all employees upon initial hiring. Any updated information shall be provided to employees within a timely manner along with information on implementation. N14: Common Area Catch Basin Inspections HOA to inspect, clean and repair common area catch basins within the development to verify that the private drainage system is working properly. All trash/ debris and sediment build up is removed and any repairs/ replacements are conducted. Cleaning should take place in late summer/ early fall prior to the start of the raining season. Drainage facilities include catch basins (storm drain inlets), detention basins, retention basins, sediment basins, open drainage channels, area drains, and lift stations. Records shall be kept onsite to document the annual maintenance. N15: Street Sweeping of Private Streets & Parking Lots HOA to schedule at a minimum street sweeping of private streets and parking areas prior to the start of the rainy seasons, in late summer or early fall. Additional sweeping may be required to remove landscaping foliage and/ or pollution. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 29 IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage S2 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction No proposed outdoor storage areas. S3 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction S4 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation No proposed slopes or channels. Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) Not Applicable. S6 Dock areas No proposed dock areas. S7 Maintenance bays No proposed maintenance bay areas. S8 Vehicle wash areas No proposed vehicle wash areas. S9 Outdoor processing areas No proposed outdoor processing areas. S10 Equipment wash areas No proposed equipment wash areas. S11 Fueling areas No proposed fueling areas. S12 Hillside landscaping No proposed hillside landscaping areas. S13 Wash water control for food preparation areas No wash water control for food preparation areas. S14 Community car wash racks No proposed community car washing racks. S1 (CASQA Fact Sheet SD-13): Storm Drain Stenciling & Signage Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 30 HOA to inspect, repair and/ or replace storm drain stenciling and signage immediately. Inspection of stenciling and signage shall occur at least once per month and prior to the start of the raining season. Storm Drain stenciling and signage with a reference that indicates “Drains to Ocean” per CASQA BMP SD-13 Fact Sheet is required. S3 (CASQA Fact Sheet SD-32): Trash Storage Areas HOA shall implement measures to prevent or reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff associated with trash storage and handling. HOA to implement the following methods to reduce the likelihood of contamination: • Reduce leaking of liquid waste by using lines bins or dumpsters • Minimize direct precipitation and rainfall from entering containers • Post signs on dumpsters prohibiting dumping of hazardous materials S4 (CASQA Fact Sheet SD-12): Use Efficient Irrigation Systems & Landscape Design HOA shall implement the timing and application methods of irrigation water to minimize the runoff of excess irrigation water into the storm drain systems. HOA to implement the following methods to reduce excessive irrigation water runoff, where applicable: • Employ rain shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after precipitation. • Utilizing landscape specific irrigation water requirements • Utilize flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by pressure drop to control water loss due to broken sprinkler heads. • Implement landscaping practices per the County Water Conservation Resolution or City agency equivalent. • Group plants or landscaping with similar water consumption in order to promote surface infiltration. Refer to CASQA BMP Fact Sheet SD-12 for additional information. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 31 IV.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (Not Applicable) IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Description of Proposed Project Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. Brownfield redevelopment, meaning redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real property which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which have the potential to contribute to adverse ground or surface WQ if not redeveloped. Higher density development projects which include two distinct categories (credits can only be taken for one category): those with more than seven units per acre of development (lower credit allowance); vertical density developments, for example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance). Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section IV CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 32 IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Not applicable for this project. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VI CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 33 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs The property is currently owned by City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC. The Owner will be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the project’s storm water facilities and conformance to this WQMP after construction is complete. A Notice of Transfer of Responsibility is located in Attachment G of this report and should be executed as part of any ownership transfer after construction is complete. The owner will appoint a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) to provide long term BMP maintenance for the proposed development upon completion of construction. Owner/ Developer: City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 258-7540 Kim Prijatel, Senior Vice President of Development Homeowner’s Association To be determined The owner is aware of the maintenance responsibilities of the proposed BMPs. A funding mechanism is in place to maintain the BMPs at the frequency stated in the WQMP. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VI CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 34 BMP Inspection/Maintenance BMP Reponsible Party(s) Inspection/ Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities Education for Property Owners, Tenants, Occupants & Employees Owner/ Future Homeowner’s Association (HOA) HOA to provide education material, a copy of the approved WQMP and Operation & Maintenance Plan (O&M) to new property owners, tenants, occupants & employees. At time of hiring, leasing and/ or home purchase. Activity Restrictions Owner/ Future HOA HOA employees notified of activities that are prohibited by homeowners. Restrictions identified in Employee Manual and reviewed yearly by employees. Common Area Landscape Management Owner/ Future HOA HOA to hire professional landscape company to conduct maintenance of landscaping to meet current water efficiency and keep plants healthy and bio areas maintained with proper soil amendments. Regular maintenance once a week and monthly inspection to determine deficiencies. Trash and Waste Storage Area Owner/ Future HOA HOA to maintain the integrity of the structural elements subject to damage such as screens, covers, and signs. Maintenance agreements between the local agency and owner/ operator may be required. A minimum 2 inspections/ cleanings per year per manufacturer’s specifications prior to October 1st (before rainy season) BMP Maintenance Owner/ Future HOA HOA to hire professional BMP maintenance company to conduct regular inspections, repairs and cleanings per manufacturer’s A minimum 2 inspections/ cleanings per year per manufacturer’s specifications prior to Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VI CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 35 specifications. October 1st (before rainy season) Title 22 CCR Compliance Owner/ Future HOA The distribution of these materials will be the responsibility of the HOA at the time of hire, lease signing or home purchase per property owner, tenant or occupant or at the initial time of hiring. At time of hiring, leasing and/ or home purchase. Uniform Fire Code Implementation Owner/ Future HOA HOA to comply with fire regulations and keep informed of the latest rules and requirements. Comply with annual fire inspections and maintain building and access per the latest fire codes. Common Area Litter Control Owner/ Future HOA HOA to provide litter removal of site parking lot and landscape areas and to empty common area trash bins. Once per week. Employee Training Owner/ Future HOA The distribution of these materials will be the responsibility of the HOA at the initial hiring of the employee. At time of hiring. Private Street & Parking Lot Sweeping Owner/ Future HOA HOA to provide maintenance of Parking Lot and provide Street Sweeping services. Weekly basis. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control Owner/ Future HOA HOA to provide maintenance of landscaping to meet current water efficiency standards, and keep plants healthily. Regular maintenance once a week and monthly inspection to determine any water deficiencies. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VI CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 36 Common Area Catch Basin Inspections Owner/ Future HOA HOA shall inspection common areas where catch basins are located within the surrounding area and remove any trash/ debris. Inspections/ Cleaning shall occur at least twice per month. Storm Drain System Stencilling & Signage Owner/ Future HOA HOA to inspect and repair as needed all onsite storm drain stencilling & signage. Inspection should occur at minimum twice per year. Modular Wetlands System (MWS) Biofiltration Vaults Owner/ Future HOA HOA will be required to hire a professional maintenance company to provide regular inspections, repairs and cleaning per manufacturer’s specifications. Inspections/ Cleanings should occur at least two times per year and before the start of the rainy season (October 1st). Refer to Attachment C for additional information and manufacturer’s specifications. Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) Device Owner/ Future HOA HOA to inspect and schedule maintenance to remove debris bluid-up, repair/ replace screen and mechanism, and clean as needed within catch basin and screen area. Inspections shall occur at least two times per year and once per year for maintenance services before the start of the rainy season (October 1st). Storm Water Sump Pump Owner/ Future HOA Owner/ HOA to conduct regular inspections and cleanings of pump station area, report performance deficiencies, and schedule regular inspections by professional technician. Inspections/ cleanings should occur at least two times per year and before the start of the rainy season (October 1st). Scheduled inspections by technician should occur at least once per year/ per manufacturer’s recommendation. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VI CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 37 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) VI.1 BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) Refer to Attachment B of this report for the WQMP Exhibit which provides the location of all proposed BMPs and a site plan of the project. VI.2 Submittal and Recordation of Water Quality Management Plan Following approval of the Final Project-Specific WQMP, three copies of the approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) will be submitted. Each approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) will be recorded in the Orange County Clerk-Recorder’s Office, prior to close-out of grading and/or building permit. Educational Materials are not required to be included. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave– RESIDENTIAL, ANAHEIM City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC Section VII CVEN-153 Preliminary WQMP Page 38 Section VII Educational Materials Refer to the Orange County Stormwater Program (www.ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds .com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint Attachment A TGD Worksheets and Figures Attachment A TGD Worksheets and Figures Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 1 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix VII (Worksheet I) for guidance on groundwater-related infiltration feasibility criteria. X Provide basis: 2 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): • The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent • The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. • A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. X Provide basis: 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate downstream water rights? X Provide basis: X The proposed site is located within the North Basin Groundwater Plume. See Appendix A for TGD Figure XVI-2d Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil characteristics which support categorization as D soils? X Provide basis: 5 Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be based on the methods described in Appendix VII. X Provide basis: 6 Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: 7 Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): 8 Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: No 9 If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. Provide basis: No DMA 1 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= 0.9 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= 0.9 inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 0.30 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 1.00 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.9 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= 882 cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate N/A 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured / Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx DMA 2 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= 0.9 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= 0.9 inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 1.45 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 1.00 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.9 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= 4,263 cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate N/A 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured / Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs - DMA 1 Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 5.00 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= 0.26 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= 0 % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 0 in/hr 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= 0.26 in/hr Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 0.30 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 1.00* 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.90 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= 0.07 cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Surface runoff will be conveyed through the private street to the proposed curb inlet Biofiltration Vault for water quality treatment. *Assumed 100% impervious coverage utilized for preliminary calculations. Actual impervious coverage will be calculated in final engineering. Provide time of concentration assumptions: The time of concentration was assumed to be 5 minutes for conservative purposes. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs – DMA 2 Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 5.00 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= 0.26 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= 0 % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 0 in/hr 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= 0.26 in/hr Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= 1.45 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 1.00* 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.90 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= 0.34 cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Surface runoff will be conveyed through the private street to the proposed curb inlet Biofiltration Vault for water quality treatment. *Assumed 100% impervious coverage utilized for preliminary calculations. Actual impervious coverage will be calculated in final engineering. Provide time of concentration assumptions: The time of concentration was assumed to be 5 minutes for conservative purposes. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Graphical Operations Worksheet J: Summary of Harvested Water Demand and Feasibility Entire Site 1 What demands for harvested water exist in the tributary area (check all that apply): 2 Toilet and urinal flushing □ 3 Landscape irrigation  4 Other:_______________________________________________________ □ 5 What is the design capture storm depth? (Figure III.1) d 0.90 inches 6 What is the project size? A 1.75 ac 7 What is the acreage of impervious area? * IA 1.75 ac For projects with multiple types of demand (toilet flushing, irrigation demand, and/or other demand) 8 What is the minimum use required for partial capture? (Table X.6) gpd 9 What is the project estimated wet season total daily use (Section X.2)? gpd 10 Is partial capture potentially feasible? (Line 9 > Line 8?) For projects with only toilet flushing demand 11 What is the minimum TUTIA for partial capture? (Table X.7) 12 What is the project estimated TUTIA? 13 Is partial capture potentially feasible? (Line 12 > Line 11?) For projects with only irrigation demand 14 What is the minimum irrigation area required based on conservation landscape design? (Table X.8) [1.75x1.01] 1.77 ac 15 What is the proposed project irrigated area? (multiply conservation landscaping by 1; multiply active turf by 2) 1.49 ac 16 Is partial capture potentially feasible? (Line 15 > Line 14?) No Provide supporting assumptions and citations for controlling demand calculation: Due to the proposed development type, density and amount of available landscaping, Harvest and Use BMPs for irrigation purposes will not be feasible. * For preliminary purposes, an assumed 100% impervious coverage based on development type was utilized for these calculations. ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTY O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY1.05 0.7 10.950.90.850.80.750.70.650. 9 5 0.70.90.9 0. 7 5 P:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-1_RainfallZones_20110215.mxdFIGUREJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP04/22/10DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYTECHNICAL GUIDANCEDOCUMENTORANGE CO.CARAINFALL ZONESSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION 03.67.21.8 Miles 06123 Kilometers LEGEND Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated City Boundaries Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches) 0.65" 0.7 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10" Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judgment shall be applied. XVI-1 PROJECT SITE ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTY O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYP:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-2a_HydroSoils_20110215.mxdFIGURE XVI-2aJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP02/09/11DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYINFILTRATION STUDYORANGE CO.CANRCS HYDROLOGICSOILS GROUPSSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION Source: Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western Riverside Date of publication: 2006-02-08 !I 03.67.21.8 Miles 05102.5 Kilometers LEGEND City Boundaries Hydrologic Soil Groups A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm PROJECT SITE ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTY O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY1010 3 51030103010 20 10 10 5 50 3 3 0 30 303020 5 102 0 30 50 1030 20 P:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-2d_DepthToGroundwaterOverview_20110215.mxdFIGURE XVI-2dJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.25 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP02/09/11DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYINFILTRATION STUDYORANGE CO.CANORTH ORANGE COUNTYMAPPED DEPTH TO FIRST GROUNDWATERSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION Note: Data are not available for South Orange County at this ti me. Source: Sprotte, Fuller and Greenwood, 1980. California Division of Mines and Geology; California Geological Survey !I 02.551.25 Miles 0482 Kilometers LEGEND Depth To First Groundwater Contours City Boundaries OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary PROJECT SITE ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTY O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYP:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Re ports\Infiltratio nFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-2f_No rthOCGroundwaterProte c tio nAre asStreetMap_20110215.mxd FIGURE XVI-2fJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.25 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP04/22/10DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYINFILTRATION STUDYORANGE CO.CANORTH ORANGE COUNTYGROUNDWATER PROTECTIONAREASSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION Note: Individual contamination sites are not plotted. See State Water Resources Control Board Geotracker database (http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov), Department of Toxic Substance Control Envirostor database (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov) and other applicable sources for current listing of active contaminated sites. Groundwater basin and plume protection boundaries for South Orange County are not shown on this exhibit at this time !I 0 2.5 51.25 Miles 0 4 82 Kilometers LEGEND City Boundaries OCWD Groundwater Basin Protection Boundary Plume Protection Boundaries North Basin Groundwater Protection Project South Basin Groundwater Protection Project El Toro Marine Base Tustin Marine Air Base Approximate Selenium Contamination Area PROJECT SITE PROJECT SITE P:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Suc e ptabilityMaps_20100505\9526E_SanGabrie lCo yo te Cre e kSusc e ptibility_20100430.mxd Anaheim Bay-Huntington Harbor Watershed Newport Bay- Newport Coastal Streams Watershed Santa River Watershed Los Angeles County Channel in Retarding Basin Los Alamitos Naval Air Station Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station Fullerton Airport Hillcrest Park Reservoir Orange County La Jolla Recharge Basin Kraemer Basin Fullerton Reservoir Fullerton ReservoirBrea Creek Reservior Humble Reservoir Valencia Reservoir Fullerton Reservoir Miller Retarding Basin Cypress Retarding Basin Los Alamitos Retarding Basin Placentia Retarding Basin Raymond Retarding Basin Gilbert Retarding Basin Crescent Retarding Basin Loftus Diversion Channel Desilting Basin Rossmoor Retarding Basin 1JOBTITLESCALE1" = 8000'DESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP04/30/10DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYWATERSHEDMASTER PLANNINGORANGE CO.CASUSCEPTIBILITY ANALYISSAN GABRIEL-COYOTE CREEK!I 0 8,000 16,000 Feet Susceptibility Potential Areas of Erosion, Habitat, & Physical Structure Susceptibility Channel Type Earth (Unstable) Earth (Stabilized) Stabilized Tidel Influence <= Mean High Water Line (4.28') Water Body Basin Lake Reservoir Other Lands Airport/Military SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP UPATE (FEB 2013) Project Site Attachment B Preliminary WQMP Exhibit Attachment B Preliminary WQMP Exhibit EV 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 Attachment C Site BMPs Attachment C Site BMPs 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90 3.95 MWS‐L‐4‐4 6.70 1.0 0.022 0.023 0.025 0.026 0.028 0.029 0.031 0.032 0.034 0.035 0.037 0.038 0.040 0.042 0.043 0.045 0.046 0.048 0.049 0.051 0.052 0.054 0.055 0.056 0.057 0.058 0.058 0.059 0.060 0.061 MWS‐L‐3‐6 10.06 1.0 0.032 0.035 0.037 0.039 0.042 0.044 0.046 0.048 0.051 0.053 0.055 0.058 0.060 0.062 0.065 0.067 0.069 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.078 0.081 0.083 0.084 0.085 0.087 0.088 0.089 0.090 0.091 MWS‐L‐4‐6 9.30 1.0 0.030 0.032 0.034 0.036 0.038 0.041 0.043 0.045 0.047 0.049 0.051 0.053 0.055 0.058 0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.070 0.073 0.075 0.077 0.078 0.079 0.080 0.081 0.082 0.083 0.084 MWS‐L‐4‐8 14.80 1.0 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.058 0.061 0.065 0.068 0.071 0.075 0.078 0.082 0.085 0.088 0.092 0.095 0.099 0.102 0.105 0.109 0.112 0.115 0.119 0.122 0.124 0.126 0.127 0.129 0.131 0.132 0.134 MWS‐L‐4‐13 18.40 1.0 0.059 0.063 0.068 0.072 0.076 0.080 0.084 0.089 0.093 0.097 0.101 0.106 0.110 0.114 0.118 0.122 0.127 0.131 0.135 0.139 0.144 0.148 0.152 0.154 0.156 0.158 0.160 0.163 0.165 0.167 MWS‐L‐4‐15 22.40 1.0 0.072 0.077 0.082 0.087 0.093 0.098 0.103 0.108 0.113 0.118 0.123 0.129 0.134 0.139 0.144 0.149 0.154 0.159 0.165 0.170 0.175 0.180 0.185 0.188 0.190 0.193 0.195 0.198 0.200 0.203 MWS‐L‐4‐17 26.40 1.0 0.085 0.091 0.097 0.103 0.109 0.115 0.121 0.127 0.133 0.139 0.145 0.151 0.158 0.164 0.170 0.176 0.182 0.188 0.194 0.200 0.206 0.212 0.218 0.221 0.224 0.227 0.230 0.233 0.236 0.239 MWS‐L‐4‐19 30.40 1.0 0.098 0.105 0.112 0.119 0.126 0.133 0.140 0.147 0.153 0.160 0.167 0.174 0.181 0.188 0.195 0.202 0.209 0.216 0.223 0.230 0.237 0.244 0.251 0.255 0.258 0.262 0.265 0.269 0.272 0.276 MWS‐L‐4‐21 34.40 1.0 0.111 0.118 0.126 0.134 0.142 0.150 0.158 0.166 0.174 0.182 0.189 0.197 0.205 0.213 0.221 0.229 0.237 0.245 0.253 0.261 0.268 0.276 0.284 0.288 0.292 0.296 0.300 0.304 0.308 0.312 MWS‐L‐6‐8 18.80 1.0 0.060 0.065 0.069 0.073 0.078 0.082 0.086 0.091 0.095 0.099 0.104 0.108 0.112 0.116 0.121 0.125 0.129 0.134 0.138 0.142 0.147 0.151 0.155 0.157 0.160 0.162 0.164 0.166 0.168 0.170 MWS‐L‐8‐8 29.60 1.0 0.095 0.102 0.109 0.115 0.122 0.129 0.136 0.143 0.149 0.156 0.163 0.170 0.177 0.183 0.190 0.197 0.204 0.211 0.217 0.224 0.231 0.238 0.245 0.248 0.251 0.255 0.258 0.262 0.265 0.268 MWS‐L‐8‐12 44.40 1.0 0.143 0.153 0.163 0.173 0.183 0.194 0.204 0.214 0.224 0.234 0.245 0.255 0.265 0.275 0.285 0.296 0.306 0.316 0.326 0.336 0.346 0.357 0.367 0.372 0.377 0.382 0.387 0.392 0.397 0.402 MWS‐L‐8‐16 59.20 1.0 0.190 0.204 0.217 0.231 0.245 0.258 0.272 0.285 0.299 0.312 0.326 0.340 0.353 0.367 0.380 0.394 0.408 0.421 0.435 0.448 0.462 0.476 0.489 0.496 0.503 0.509 0.516 0.523 0.530 0.537 MWS‐L‐8‐20 74.00 1.0 0.238 0.255 0.272 0.289 0.306 0.323 0.340 0.357 0.374 0.391 0.408 0.425 0.442 0.459 0.476 0.493 0.509 0.526 0.543 0.560 0.577 0.594 0.611 0.620 0.628 0.637 0.645 0.654 0.662 0.671 MWS‐L‐10‐20 or MWS‐L‐8‐24 88.80 1.0 0.285 0.306 0.326 0.346 0.367 0.387 0.408 0.428 0.448 0.469 0.489 0.509 0.530 0.550 0.571 0.591 0.611 0.632 0.652 0.673 0.693 0.713 0.734 0.744 0.754 0.764 0.774 0.785 0.795 0.805 4'x'4 media cage 14.80 1.0 0.048 0.051 0.054 0.058 0.061 0.065 0.068 0.071 0.075 0.078 0.082 0.085 0.088 0.092 0.095 0.099 0.102 0.105 0.109 0.112 0.115 0.119 0.122 0.124 MWS MODEL SIZE WETLAND PERMITER LENGTH LOADING RATE GPM/SF HGL HEIGHT SHALLOW MODELS STANDARD HEIGHT MODEL HIGH CAPACITY MODELS MWS Linear 2.0 HGL Sizing Calculations MWS – Linear Hybrid Stormwater Filtration System SPECIFICATIONS Modular Wetland Systems, Inc. www.modularwetlands.com P.O. Box 869 P 760-433-7640 Oceanside, CA 92049 F 760-433-3179 MWS – Linear Hybrid Stormwater Filtration System Save valuable space with small otprint for urban sites. d tropical ndscape plants. er and ss expensive maintenance ystem unoff is in d ischarge chamber the rate of discharge is controlled by valves set to a desired rate”. ested Pollutant Removal Efficiencies: fo Improve BMP aesthetics with attractive native an la Reduce lifetime costs with saf le “The MWS – Linear hybrid stormwater treatment system is described as a self contained treatment train. This system utilizes an innovative combination of l treatment processes. Stormwater runoff flows into the s via pipe or curb/grate type catch basin opening. Polluted runoff first encounters a screening device to remove larger pollutants and then enters a hydrodynamic separation chamber which settles out the sediments and larger suspended solids. Next the r treated by a revolutionary filter media, BioMediaGREEN that removes fines and associated pollutants, including bacteria. From there runoff enters of bioretention filter the form of a subsurface flow vegetated gravel wetland. Within the wetland physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms remove the remaining particulate and dissolve pollutants. The purified runoff leaves the system via the discharge chamber. In the d T Removal Di d Removal D Removal TPH Removal Removal TSS ssolve Lead issolved Copper E. coli Turbidity 98% 81% 92% 99% 60.2% 92% “Nature and Harmony Working Together in Perfect Harmony” SPECIFICATIONS – MWS- LINEAR gaged in the engineering design and roduction of treatment systems for stormwater. treat the entire water quality olume when used with pre-storage and properly sized. ls. g ¾” x 1 nels are g ted of UV protected/marine grade berglass and stainless steel hinge and mount. uires tails of this are provided in the installation section of the WS-Linear Design Kit. Track Record: The MWS- Linear Hybrid Stormwater Treatment System is manufactured by a company whom is regularly en p Coverage: The MWS- Linear is designed to treat the water quality volume or water quality flow. For flow based design, high flow bypass is internal, for volume based design, high flow bypass is external and prior to pre-detention system. For offline volume based designs the MWS - Linear has the ability to v Non-Corrosive Materials: The MWS – Linear is designed with non-corrosive materia All internal piping is SD35 PVC. Catch basin filter components, including mountin hardware, fasteners, support brackets, filtration material, and support frame are constructed of non-corrosive materials (316 stainless steel, and UV protected/marine grade fiberglass). Fasteners are stainless steel. Primary filter mesh is 316 stainless steel welded screens. Filtration basket screens for coarse, medium and fine filtration is ¾“expanded, 10 x 10 mesh, and 35 x 35 mesh, respectively. No polypropylene, monofilament netting or fabrics shall be used in this system. Media Protective Pa constructed of UV protected/marine grade fiberglass. Mounts are constructed of stainless steel. BioMediaGREEN is an inert rock substrate and is non-corrosive. Perimeter filter structure is constructed of lightweight injection molded plastic. Mountin brackets are constructed of SD40 PVC and are mounted with 3/8” diameter stainless steel redheads. Drain down filter cover is construc fi Weight: Each complete unit weighs approximately 29,000 to 40,000 pounds and req a boom crane to install. De M Transportation: The Modular Wetland System – Linear is designed to be transported a standard flat bed t on ruck. The unit easily fits on a flat bed truck without the need of pecial permitting. d noff can enter the system through a pipe, and/or a uilt in curb or grate type opening. etland System – Linear is completely passive and quires no external energy sources. he tation. As a precaution a footing can lso be built into the systems concrete structure. re o slippage, breaking, or tearing. All filters are warranted for a minimum of five (5) years. e hydrocarbon removal abilities. Within the wetland filter biological processes capture and s Alternative Technology Configurations: The Modular Wetland System – Linear is modular is design. Each module will be up to 22 feet long and 5 feet wide. The system can be made in lengths varying from 13 to 100s of feet long. For lengths longer than 22 feet the system will shipped in modules and assembled on site. The Modular Wetlan System – Linear has many alternative configurations. This allows the system to be adapted to many site conditions. Ru b Energy Requirements: The Modular W re Buoyancy Issues: Buoyancy is only a an issue when ground water levels rise above t bottom of the Modular Wetland System – Linear’s concrete structure. With 8.5 cubic yards of wetland media there is no concern of floa a Durability: The structure of the box will be precast concrete. The concrete will be 28 day compressive strength fc = 5,000 psi. Steel reinforcing will be ASTM A – C857. Structu will support an H20 loading as indicted by AASHTO. The joint between the concrete sections will ship lap and joint sealed with ram-nek. Filter (excluding oil absorbent media) and support structures are of proven durability. The filter and mounting structures are of sufficient strength to support water, sediment, and debris loads when the filter is full, with n Oil Absorbent Media: The MWS – Linear utilizes both physical and biological mechanisms to capture and filter oil and grease. A skimmer and boom system will b positioned on the internal perimeter of the catch basin insert. The primary filtration media, BioMediaGreen, utilized in the perimeter and drain down filters, has excellent break down oil and grease. Much of the breakdown and transformation of oil and grease performed by natural occurring bacteria. n system. For eak flows that exceed internal bypass capacity, external bypass is use. for internally bypassed flows. External bypass will bypass of eatment processes. ze. Annual een and quarter-scale boratory tests on the MWS – Linear flow based system. POLLUTANT FICIENCY is Overflow Protection: The grate and curb type MWS – Linear are designed with an internal bypass consisting of two SD PVC pipes which direct high flows around the perimeter and wetland filter, directly into the discharge chamber. For the volume based vault type configuration, bypass should be located prior to the pre-detentio p Filter Bypass: Runoff will bypass filtration (BioMediaGREEN and wetland filter) components of the MWS - Linear. The system will still provide screening and settling during higher flow rates tr Pollutant Removal Efficiency: The MWS - Linear is capable of removing over 90% of the net annual total suspended solids (TSS) load based on a 20-micron particle si TSS removal efficiency models are based on documented removal efficiency performance from full-scale laboratory tests on BioMediaGr la REMOVAL EF Trash & Litter 99% TPH (mg/L) 99% TSS (mg/L) 98% E. Coli (MPN/100ml) 60% Turbidity (NTU) 92% Dissolved Metals (mg/L) 76% Non-Scouring: During heavy storm events the runoff bypasses perimeter and wetland lter components. The system will not re-suspend solids at design flows. rticle diameter = 19 microns Sil-Co-Sil 106. Mean pa fi Uniqueness: The Modular Wetland System – Linear is a complete self contain treatment train that incorporates capture, screening, sedimentation, filtration, bioretention, high flow bypass, and flow control into a single modular structure. This system provides four stages of treatment making it the only 4 stage treatment train stormwater filtration system, therefore making it unique to the industry. Other s not incorporate all the necessary attributes to make it a complete stormwater management device as ed ystems do with the Modular Wetland System – Linear. Therefore, no equal xists for this system. ter management system no external retreatment of preconditioning is necessary. PECIFICATIONS – BioMediaGREEN se nd is also biodegradable. It is stable with no nown adverse environmental effects. injection) studies have hown that the products disappear very rapidly from the lung. dies that show no relation between inhalation exposure nd the development of tumors. e Pretreatment & Preconditioning: Since the Modular Wetland System – Linear is a complete capture and treatment train stormwa p S BioMediaGREEN is a proprietary engineered filter media. Made of a unique combination of the inert naturally occurring material this product is non-combustible and do not po a fire hazard, stable and non-reactive, a k This product has been tested in long-term carcinogenicity studies [inhalation and intraperitoneal injection (i.p.)] with no significant increase in lung tumors or abdominal tumors. Short-term biopersistent (inhalation and intra-tracheal s In October 2001, IARC classified this product as Group 3, "not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans". The 2001 decision was based on the latest epidemiological studies and animal inhalation stu a The product can typically be disposed of in an ordinary landfill (local regulations may apply). If you are unsure of the regulations, contact your local Public Health Department r the local office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). nt REEN ut ut filters, catch basin inserts, ater polishing units, and hydrodynamic separators. ve Materials: The BioMediaGreen material is made of non-corrosive aterials. MediaGREEN material has been tested through gorous flow and loading conditions. has been proven to capture and tain hydrocarbons. and liage, sediments, TSS, particulate and dissolved etals, nutrients, and bacteria. le o Coverage: When properly installed BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks provide sufficie contact time, at rated flows, of passing contaminate water. The BioMediaG material will capture and retain most pollutants that pass through it. The BioMediaGREEN material is made of a proprietary blend of inert substances. The BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks can be used in different treatment devices, including b not limited to flume filters, trench drain filters, downspo w Non-Corrosi m Durability: The BioMediaGREEN material has been chosen for its proven durability, with an expected life of 2 plus years. The BioMediaGREEN material is of sufficient strength to support water, sediment, and debris loads when the media is at maximum flow; with no slippage, breaking, or tearing. The Bio ri Oil Absorbent Media: The BioMediaGREEN material re Pollutant Removal Efficiency: The BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks are designed to capture high levels of Hydrocarbons including but not limited to oils & grease, gasoline, diesel, and PAHs. BioMediaGREEN Filter Blocks have the physical ability to block filter trash and litter, grass and fo m BioMediaGREEN technology is based on a proprietary blend of synthetic inert natural substances aimed at removal of various stormwater pollutants. BioMediaGREEN was created to have a very porous structure capable of selectively removing pollutants whi allowing high flow through rates for water. As pollutants are captured by its structure, ioMediaGREEN captures most pollutants and maintains porosity and filtering rge percentage of TSS, hydrocarbons, nutrients, and heavy metals. Microbial reduction ary depending on colony size, flow rates and site specific conditions. REMOVAL EFFICIENCY B capabilities. Field and laboratory tests have confirmed the BioMediaGREEN capability to capture la efficiency will v POLLUTANT Oil & Grease (mg/L) 90% TPH (mg/L) 99% TSS (mg/L) 85% Turbidity (NTU) 99% Total Phosphorus (mg/L) 69.6% Dissolved Metals (mg/L) 75.6% Replacement: Removal and replacement of the blocks is simple. Remove blocks from ltration system. Replace with new block of equal size. Sil-Co-Sil 106. Mean particle diameter = 19 microns fi MWS Linear Advanced Stormwater Biofiltration Contents 1 Introduction 2 Applications 3 Configurations 4 Advantages 5 Operation 6 Orientations | Bypass 7 Performance | Approvals 8 Sizing 9 Installation | Maintenance | Plants www.ModularWetlands.com The Urban Impact For hundreds of years natural wetlands surrounding our shores have played an integral role as nature’s stormwater treatment system. But as our cities grow and develop, these natural wet- lands have perished under countless roads, rooftops, and parking lots. Plant A Wetland Without natural wetlands our cities are deprived of water purification, flood control, and land stability. Modular Wetlands and the MWS Linear re-establish nature’s presence and rejuvenate water ways in urban areas. MWS Linear The Modular Wetland System Linear represents a pioneering breakthrough in stormwater tech- nology as the only biofiltration system to utilize patented horizontal flow, allowing for a smaller footprint and higher treatment capacity. While most biofilters use little or no pre-treatment, the MWS Linear incorporates an advanced pre-treatment chamber that includes separation and pre- filter cartridges. In this chamber sediment and hydrocarbons are removed from runoff before it enters the biofiltration chamber, in turn reducing maintenance costs and improving performance. Parking Lots Parking lots are designed to maximize space and the MWS Linear’s 4 ft. standard planter width al- lows for easy integration into parking lot islands and other landscape medians. Mixed Use The MWS Linear can be installed as a raised plant- er to treat runoff from rooftops or patios, making it perfect for sustainable “live-work” spaces. Industrial Many states enforce strict regulations for dis- charges from industrial sites. The MWS Linear has helped various sites meet difficult EPA mandated effluent limits for dissolved metals and other pol- lutants. Residential Low to high density developments can benefit from the versatile design of the MWS Linear. The system can be used in both decentralized LID de- sign and cost-effective end-of-the-line configura- tions. Streets Street applications can be challenging due to limited space. The MWS Linear is very adaptable, and offers the smallest footprint to work around the constraints of existing utilities on retrofit pro- jects. Commercial Compared to bioretention systems, the MWS Lin- ear can treat far more area in less space - meeting treatment and volume control requirements. Applications The MWS Linear has been successfully used on numerous new construction and retrofit projects. The system’s superior versatility makes it beneficial for a wide range of stormwater and waste water applications - treating rooftops, streetscapes, parking lots, and industrial sites. More applications are available on our website: www.ModularWetlands.com/Applications • Agriculture • Reuse • Low Impact Development • Waste Water www.ModularWetlands.com Configurations The MWS Linear is the preferred biofiltration system of Civil Engineers across the country due to its versatile design. This highly versatile system has available “pipe-in” options on most models, along with built-in curb or grated inlets for simple integration into your stormdrain design. Curb Type The Curb Type configuration accepts sheet flow through a curb opening and is commonly used along road ways and parking lots. It can be used in sump or flow by conditions. Length of curb opening varies based on model and size. Grate Type The Grate Type configuration offers the same features and benefits as the Curb Type but with a grated/drop inlet above the systems pre-treatment chamber. It has the added benefit of allowing for pedestrian access over the inlet. ADA compliant grates are available to assure easy and safe access. The Grate Type can also be used in scenarios where runoff needs to be intercepted on both sides of landscape islands. Downspout Type The Downspout Type is a variation of the Vault Type and is designed to accept a vertical downspout pipe from roof top and podium areas. Some models have the option of utilizing an internal bypass, simplifying the overall design. The system can be installed as a raised planter and the exterior can be stuccoed or covered with other finishes to match the look of adjacent buildings. Vault Type The system’s patented horizontal flow biofilter is able to accept inflow pipes directly into the pre-treatment chamber, meaning the MWS Linear can be used in end-of-the-line installations. This greatly improves feasibility over typical decentralized designs that are required with other biofiltration/bioretention systems. Another benefit of the “pipe in” design is the ability to install the system downstream of underground detention systems to meet water quality volume requirements. Page 3 Cartridge Housing Pre-filter Cartridge Curb Inlet Individual Media Filters Advantages & Operation The MWS Linear is the most efficient and versatile biofiltration system on the market, and the only system with horizontal flow which improves performance, reduces footprint, and minimizes maintenance. Figure-1 and Figure-2 illustrate the invaluable benefits of horizontal flow and the multiple treatment stages. • Horizontal Flow Biofiltration • Greater Filter Surface Area • Pre-Treatment Chamber • Patented Perimeter Void Area • Flow Control • No Depressed Planter Area Separation • Trash, sediment, and debris are separated before entering the pre-filter cartridges • Designed for easy maintenance access Pre-Filter Cartridges • Over 25 ft2 of surface area per cartridge • Utilizes BioMediaGREEN filter material • Removes over 80% of TSS & 90% of hydrocarbons • Prevents pollutants that cause clogging from migrating to the biofiltration chamber Pre-Treatment1 1 2 Drain- 1 2Vertical Underdrain Manifold Featured Advantages www.ModularWetlands.com Fig. 1 Horizontal Flow • Less clogging than downward flow biofilters • Water flow is subsurface • Improves biological filtration Patented Perimeter Void Area • Vertically extends void area between the walls and the WetlandMEDIA on all four sides. • Maximizes surface area of the media for higher treatment capacity WetlandMEDIA • Contains no organics and removes phosphorus • Greater surface area and 48% void space • Maximum evapotranspiration • High ion exchange capacity and light weight Flow Control • Orifice plate controls flow of water through WetlandMEDIA to a level lower than the media’s capacity. • Extends the life of the media and improves performance Drain-Down Filter • The Drain-Down is an optional feature that completely drains the pre-treatment chamber • Water that drains from the pre-treatment chamber between storm events will be treated 2x to 3x More Surface Area Than Traditional Downward Flow Bioretention Systems.Fig. 2 - Top View Biofiltration2 Discharge3 Perimeter V o i d A r e a 3 4 3 Flow Control Riser -Down Line Outlet Pipe Page 5 Orientations Bypass Internal Bypass Weir (Side-by-Side Only) The Side-By-Side orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chambers adjacent to one an- other allowing for integration of internal bypass. The wall between these chambers can act as a by- pass weir when flows exceed the system’s treatment capacity, thus allowing bypass from the pre-treat- ment chamber directly to the discharge chamber. External Diversion Weir Structure This traditional offline diversion method can be used with the MWS Linear in scenarios where run- off is being piped to the system. These simple and effective structures are generally configured with two outflow pipes. The first is a smaller pipe on the upstream side of the diversion weir - to divert low flows over to the MWS Linear for treatment. The second is the main pipe that receives water once the system has exceeded treatment capacity and water flows over the weir. Flow By Design This method is one in which the system is placed just upstream of a standard curb or grate inlet to intercept the first flush. Higher flows simply pass by the MWS Linear and into the standard inlet down- stream. End-To-End The End-To-End orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chambers on opposite ends of the biofiltration chamber therefore minimizing the width of the system to 5 ft (outside dimension). This orientation is perfect for linear projects and street retrofits where existing utilities and sidewalks limit the amount of space available for installation. One limitation of this orientation is bypass must be ex- ternal. Side-By-Side The Side-By-Side orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chamber adjacent to one an- other with the biofiltration chamber running paral- lel on either side. This minimizes the system length, providing a highly compact footprint. It has been proven useful in situations such as streets with di- rectly adjacent sidewalks, as half of the system can be placed under that sidewalk. This orientation also offers internal bypass options as discussed below. This simple yet innovative diversion trough can be installed in existing or new curb and grate inlets to divert the first flush to the MWS Linear via pipe. It works similar to a rain gutter and is installed just below the opening into the inlet. It captures the low flows and channels them over to a connecting pipe exiting out the wall of the inlet and leading to the MWS Linear. The DVERT is perfect for retrofit and green street applications that allows the MWS Lin- ear to be installed anywhere space is available. DVERT Low Flow Diversion DVERT Trough www.ModularWetlands.com Rhode Island DEM Approved Approved as an authorized BMP and noted to achieve the following minimum removal efficiencies: 85% TSS, 60% Pathogens, 30% Total Phosphorus for discharges to freshwater systems, and 30% Total Nitrogen for discharges to saltwater or tidal systems. MASTEP Evaluation The University of Massachusetts at Amherst – Water Resources Research Center, issued a technical evaluation report noting removal rates up to 84% TSS, 70% Total Phosphorus, 68.5% Total Zinc, and more. Washington State DOE Approved The MWS Linear is approved for General Use Level Designation (GULD) for Basic, En- hanced, and Phosphorus treatment at 1 gpm/ft2 loading rate. The highest performing BMP on the market for all main pollutant categories. Approvals The MWS Linear has successfully met years of challenging technical reviews and testing from some of the most prestigious and demanding agencies in the nation, and perhaps the world. DEQ Assignment The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality assigned the MWS Linear, the highest phosphorus removal rating for manufactured treatment devices to meet the new Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Technical Criteria. VA TSS Total Phosphorus Ortho Phosphorus Nitrogen Dissolved Zinc Dissolved Copper Total Zinc Total Copper Motor Oil 85%64%67%45%66%38%69%50%95% Performance The MWS Linear continues to outperform other treatment methods with superior pollutant removal for TSS, heavy metals, nutrients, hydrocarbons and bacteria. Since 2007 the MWS Linear has been field tested on nu- merous sites across the country. With it’s advanced pre-treatment chamber and innovative horizontal flow biofilter, the system is able to effectively remove pollutants through a combination of physical, chemical, and biological filtration processes. With the same biological processes found in natural wetlands, the MWS Linear harnesses natures ability to process, transform, and remove even the most harmful pollutants. Page 7 Treatment Flow Sizing Table Model #Dimensions WetlandMedia Surface Area Treatment Flow Rate (cfs) MWS-L-4-4 4’ x 4’23 ft2 0.052 MWS-L-4-6 4’ x 6’32 ft2 0.073 MWS-L-4-8 4’ x 8’50 ft2 0.115 MWS-L-4-13 4’ x 13’63 ft2 0.144 MWS-L-4-15 4’ x 15’76 ft2 0.175 MWS-L-4-17 4’ x 17’90 ft2 0.206 MWS-L-4-19 4’ x 19’103 ft2 0.237 MWS-L-4-21 4’ x 21’117 ft2 0.268 MWS-L-8-8 8’ x 8’100 ft2 0.230 MWS-L-8-12 8’ x 12’151 ft2 0.346 MWS-L-8-16 8’ x 16’201 ft2 0.462 Flow Based Sizing The MWS Linear can be used in stand alone applica- tions to meet treatment flow requirements. Since the MWS Linear is the only biofiltration system that can ac- cept inflow pipes several feet below the surface it can be used not only in decentralized design applications but also as a large central end-of-the-line application for maximum feasibility. Volume Based Sizing Many states require treatment of a water quality volume and do not offer the option of flow based design. The MWS Linear and its unique horizontal flow makes it the only biofilter that can be used in volume based design installed downstream of ponds, detention basins, and underground storage systems. Treatment Volume Sizing Table Model #Treatment Capacity (cu. ft.) @ 24-Hour Drain Down Treatment Capacity (cu. ft.) @ 48-Hour Drain Down MWS-L-4-4 1140 2280 MWS-L-4-6 1600 3200 MWS-L-4-8 2518 5036 MWS-L-4-13 3131 6261 MWS-L-4-15 3811 7623 MWS-L-4-17 4492 8984 MWS-L-4-19 5172 10345 MWS-L-4-21 5853 11706 MWS-L-8-8 5036 10072 MWS-L-8-12 7554 15109 MWS-L-8-16 10073 20145 www.ModularWetlands.com Installation The MWS Linear is simple, easy to install, and has a space efficient design that offers lower excavation and in- stallation costs compared to traditional tree-box type systems. The structure of the system resembles pre-cast catch basin or utility vaults and is installed in a similar fashion. The system is delivered fully assembled for quick in- stallation. Generally, the structure can be unloaded and set in place in 15 minutes. Our experienced team of field technicians are available to supervise installations and provide technical support. Plant Selection Abundant plants, trees, and grasses bring value and an aesthetic benefit to any urban setting, but those in the MWS Linear do even more - they increase pollutant removal. What’s not seen, but very important, is that below grade the stormwater runoff/flow is being subjected to nature’s secret weapon: a dynamic physical, chemi- cal, and biological process working to break down and remove non-point source pollutants. The flow rate is controlled in the MWS Linear, giving the plants more “contact time” so that pollutants are more successfully decomposed, volatilized and incorporated into the biomass of The MWS Linear’s micro/macro flora and fauna. A wide range of plants are suitable for use in the MWS Linear, but selec- tions vary by location and climate. View suitable plants by selecting the list relative to your project location’s hardy zone. Please visit www.ModularWetlands.com/Plants for more information and various plant lists. Maintenance Reduce your maintenance costs, man hours, and materials with the MWS Linear. Unlike other biofiltration systems that provide no pre-treatment, the MWS Linear is a self-contained treatment train which incorporates simple and effective pre-treatment. Maintenance requirements for the biofilter itself are almost completely eliminated, as the pre-treatment chamber removes and isolates trash, sediments, and hydrocarbons. What’s left is the simple maintenance of an easily accessible pre-treatment chamber that can be cleaned by hand or with a standard vac truck. Only periodic replacement of low- cost media in the pre-filter cartridges is required for long term opera- tion and there is absolutely no need to replace expensive biofiltration media. Page 9 GENERAL NOTES INSTALLATION NOTES ISO VIEW - U SHAPE TOP SECTION VIEW - U SHAPE Bio Clean CPS A Stormwater Trash Capture Solution A Forterra Company OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL 5796 Armada Drive Suite 250 | Carlsbad, CA 92008 | 855.566.3938 stormwater@forterrabp.com | biocleanenvironmental.com 1 | Page OPERATION & MAINTENANCE CPS devices should be maintained by individuals who are trained in proper disposal procedures, confined space entry and traffic safety regulations. When servicing a Bio Clean CPS device be sure to follow all safety and traffic control protocols as well as wearing all proper personal protection equipment such as gloves, safety glasses, hard-hat, safety vest and work boots. Visua l Inspection 1.Begin by inspecting the inflow of the catch basin where the Bio Clean CPS device is located. Check for any obstructions to inflow of the CB unit. If any large obstructions are found, have them removed. Once the inflow inspection is completed, remove the man-hole cover for further inspection. (Note: Confined Space Entry Procedures may apply if trained personnel intend to enter the interior space of any Catch Basin. Please follow all applicable confined space entry procedures) 2.Remove the manhole cover and visually estimate the amount and types of debris found in the CB unit. Look for any visual signs of damage that may compromise the CB unit to function properly. Inspect for any standing water in the CB unit as well as for large amounts of sediment and debris surrounding the CPS device. If standing water and high sediment volume is found, remove water, sediment and debris by vacuum truck or by other debris removal methods. 2 | Page Clea ning Procedures a nd Frequencies 1.Like all other storm water BMP’s, Bio Clean CPS devices require periodic maintenance. Routine inspection and maintenance intervals for all CPS devices are typically twice per year for inspections and once per year for maintenance service. Bio Clean CPS devices may require more frequent maintenance service if the device is located in a high debris loading drainage area, such as certain downtown areas, retail/restaurant, or residential areas where a significant amount of vegetation/foliage is located. In such cases, Bio Clean CPS devices may require more frequent inspection and maintenance service, which could range from twice per year to monthly inspection and maintenance service, depending on pollutant load conditions. 2.To begin Bio Clean CPS cleaning procedures, conduct a visual inspection of the CPS device and the surrounding area to ensure a safe working environment. Setup appropriate barriers and signage as necessary to establish a work zone surrounding the catch basin. Once the work zone has been established, remove the manhole cover from the catch basin. 3.Once the manhole cover is removed from the basin the Bio Clean CPS is ready for servicing. All debris can be removed by either a vacuum truck or manually removing sediment and debris by hand. 4. Bio Clean CPS devices shall be cleaned using a pressure washer as may be necessary if any materials are found to cause occlusion or clogging of the screen. Disposa l 1.All trash and debris removed from the Bio Clean CPS unit shall be disposed of in accordance with local, state and federal regulation. 2.Solid waste disposal can be coordinated with local landfills. Liquids may need to be disposed of by wastewater treatment plant, municipal vacuum truck decant facility or approved facility. For Maintenance Services or Information Please Contact Us At: 760-433-7640 Or Email: info@biocleanenvironmental.com Stormwater Connector Pipe Screen Page 1 of 4 Section [________] Stormwater Connector Pipe Screen PART 1 – GENERAL 01.01.00 Purpose The purpose of this specification is to establish generally acceptable criteria for Connector Pipe Screens used for collecting trash and debris inside catch basins. It is intended to serve as a guide to producers, distributors, architects, engineers, contractors, plumbers, installers, inspectors, agencies and users; to promote understanding regarding materials, manufacture and installation; and to provide for identification of devices complying with this specification. 01.02.00 Description Stormwater Connector Pipe Screens (CPS) are used to prevent trash and debris from entering the stormwater system during dry weather and moderate storm flows by keeping the trash inside the catch basin. The CPS is a screen placed permanently or temporarily in a catch basin at the location of the outlet pipe. The screen separates trash and debris from stormwater treatment flows. Flows that exceed the treatment flow rate bypass over the top of the screen. When the outlet pipe is located below a curb opening the CPS features a lid to prevent debris from passing behind the screen and flowing directly to the outlet pipe. The CPS shall be designed to retain all trash larger than 5 mm (0.197 inches) in the catch basin. 01.03.00 Manufacturer The manufacturer of the CPS shall be one that is regularly engaged in the engineering, design and production of systems developed for the treatment of stormwater runoff for at least (10) years, and which has a history of successful production, acceptable to the engineer of work. In accordance with the drawings, the CPS(s) shall be a screen device manufactured/distributed by Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc., or assigned distributors or licensees. Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc. can be reached at: 5796 Armada Drive, Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 433-7640 Fax: (760) 433-3176 www.biocleanenvironmental.net 01.04.00 Submittals 01.04.01 Submittal drawings will be provided with each order to the contractor and engineer of work. 01.04.02 Submittal drawings are to detail the CPS, its components and the sequence for installation, including: • CPS configuration with primary dimensions • Various CPS components • Any accessory equipment 01.04.03 Inspection and maintenance documentation submitted upon request. 01.05.00 Work Included 01.05.01 Specification requirements for installation of CPS. 01.05.02 Manufacturer to supply CPS(s): Stormwater Connector Pipe Screen Page 2 of 4 • Screen • Mounting hardware • Bypass lid with supports (when required) PART 2 – COMPONENTS 02.01.01 The CPS shall have a sufficient structural integrity to withstand a lateral force of standing water within the catch basin area when the screen becomes 100% clogged. The CPS unit shall be bolted to the catch basin walls. 02.01.02 The CPS shall be configured with deflector plates or screens preventing trash from falling between the screen and connector pipe. The deflector plate shall be designed to withstand a vertical load. 02.01.03 The gap at the bottom, sides, and joints of the CPS unit shall not exceed 5 mm (0.197 inches). 02.01.04 The CPS shall include vertical structural stiffeners extending the full length of the screen in the form as bends in the screen itself, a bolting surface to fasten the CPS to the wall of the catch basin, and support for the upper portion of the CPS unit referred to as the “bypass.” 02.01.05 All parts/components of the CPS unit must be sized to fit through the catch basin’s manhole opening. 02.01.06 The CPS frame shall be fabricated from 304 stainless steel. 02.01.07 The CPS screen shall be fabricated from perforated 304 stainless steel. The screen shall have a minimum thickness of 16 gauge. The geometrical opening shape shall have a diameter of 5 mm (0.197 inches). 02.01.08 The screen material used shall have at least 45% open area. 02.01.09 Any edge of the CPS that is not flush with the wall or floor of the catch basin shall be smooth with no prongs or jagged edges. 02.01.10 The assembly bolts, screws, nuts, and washers shall be fabricated entirely from 316 stainless steel. The concrete anchor bolts shall use a wedge anchor, with Type 316 stainless steel threaded rods, nuts, and washers. PART 3 – PERFORMANCE 03.01.00 General 03.01.01 Function - The CPS has no moving internal components and functions based on gravity flow, unless otherwise specified. Stormwater runoff enters the catch basin through a curb opening and flows toward the connector pipe. The CPS is placed to intercept flows prior to exiting the catch basin through the connector pipe. The CPS must be able to be removed through the catch basin opening. Stormwater flow up to the peak treatment rate is processed through the screen. Flows in excess of the peak treatment rate will overtop the screen in a bypass. The lid (when required) shall be place high enough above the screen to allow for full bypass flow. 03.01.02 Pollutants - The CPS will remove and retain trash and debris larger than 5 mm in diameter entering the catch basin during frequent storm events and specified flow rates. 03.01.03 Treatment Flow Rate - The CPS operates through gravity flow. The CPS is to be sized so the screen is capable of passing the calculated project specific water quality flow rate per local standards. All treatment flow rates must include a 50% screen clogging factor. Stormwater Connector Pipe Screen Page 3 of 4 03.01.04 Bypass Flow Rate – The CPS is designed to fit within the catch basin in a way not to affect the existing hydraulics and treat or bypass all flows. The bypass must be sized with a surface area greater than the outlet pipe size, thus the CPS shall not be a critical point of flow restriction. PART 4 - EXECUTION 04.01.00 General The installation and use of the CPS shall conform to all applicable national, state, municipal and local specifications. 04.02.00 Installation The contractor shall furnish all labor, equipment, materials and incidentals required to install the CPS device(s) and appurtenances in accordance with the drawings, installation manual, and these specifications, and be inspected and approved by the local governing agency. Any damage to catch basin and surrounding infrastructure caused by the installation of the CPS is the responsibility of the installation contractor. 04.02.01 CPS and all components or accessories shall be inserted through the catch basin and properly secured per manufactures installation manual and these specifications. 04.03.00 Shipping, Storage and Handling 04.03.01 Shipping – CPS shall be shipped to the contractor’s address and is the responsibility of the contractor to transport the unit(s) to the exact site of installation. 04.03.02 Storage and Handling– The contractor shall exercise care in the storage and handling of the CPS(s) and its components prior to and during installation. Any repair or replacement costs associated with events occurring after delivery is accepted, and unloading has commenced shall be born by the contractor. The CPS(s) and its components shall always be stored indoors and transported inside the original shipping container(s) until the CPS(s) are ready to be installed. The CPS shall always be handled with care and lifted according to OSHA and NIOSA lifting recommendations and/or contractor’s workplace safety professional recommendations. 04.04.00 Maintenance and Inspection 04.04.01 Inspection – After installation, the contractor shall demonstrate that the CPS has been properly installed at the correct location(s), elevations, and with appropriate supports and fasteners. All components associated with the CPS and its installation shall be subject to inspection by the engineer of work, governing agency, and the manufacture at the place of installation. In addition, the contractor shall demonstrate that the CPS has been installed per the manufacturer’s specifications and recommendations. CPS(s) shall be physically inspected regularly in accordance to owner’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and manufacture’s recommendations. An inspection record shall be kept by the inspection operator. The record shall include the condition of the CPS and its appurtenances. The most current copy of the inspection record shall always be copied and placed in the owner’s SWPPP. 04.04.02 Maintenance – The maintenance shall be performed by someone qualified. A Maintenance Manual is available upon request from the manufacturer. The Stormwater Connector Pipe Screen Page 4 of 4 manual has detailed information regarding the maintenance of the CPS(s). A detailed Maintenance Record shall be kept by the maintenance operator. The Maintenance Record shall include any maintenance activities preformed, amount and description of debris collected, and the condition of the CPS. The most current copy of the Maintenance Record shall always be copied and placed in the owner’s Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per governing agency. Upon cleaning: no trash or debris shall be located in the catch basin, on top of the bypass lid, or between the screen; no vegetation shall block the catch basin opening or connector pipe; and no trash or debris shall be located within the catch basin opening. 04.04.03 Material Disposal - All debris, trash, organics, and sediments captured and removed from the CPS shall be transported and disposed of at an approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state regulations. Please refer to state and local regulations for the proper disposal of toxic and non- toxic material. PART 5 – QUALITY ASSURANCE 05.01.00 Warranty The manufacturer shall guarantee the CPS against all manufacturing defects in materials and workmanship for a period of (3) years from the date of delivery to the contractor. The manufacturer shall be notified of repair or replacement issues in writing within the warranty period. The CPS is limited to recommended application for which it was designed. [End of This Section] TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-69 December 20, 2013 BIO-7: Proprietary Biotreatment Proprietary biotreatment devices are devices that are manufactured to mimic natural systems such as bioretention areas by incorporating plants, soil, and microbes engineered to provide treatment at higher flow rates or volumes and with smaller footprints than their natural counterparts. Incoming flows are typically filtered through a planting media (mulch, compost, soil, plants, microbes, etc.) and either infiltrated or collected by an underdrain and delivered to the storm water conveyance system. Tree box filters are an increasingly common type of proprietary biotreatment device that are installed at curb level and filled with a bioretention type soil. For low to moderate flows they operate similarly to bioretention systems and are bypassed during high flows. Tree box filters are highly adaptable solutions that can be used in all types of development and in all types of soils but are especially applicable to dense urban parking lots, street, and roadways. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Proprietary biotreatment devices that are unlined may cause incidental infiltration. Therefore, an evaluation of site conditions should be conducted to evaluate whether the BMP should include an impermeable liner to avoid infiltration into the subsurface. Opportunity Criteria x Drainage areas of 0.25 to 1.0 acres. x Land use may include commercial, residential, mixed use, institutional, and subdivisions. Proprietary biotreatment facilities may also be applied in parking lot islands, traffic circles, road shoulders, and road medians. x Must not adversely affect the level of flood protection provided by the drainage system. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Frequent maintenance and the use of screens and grates to keep trash out may decrease the likelihood of clogging and prevent obstruction and bypass of incoming flows. □ Consult proprietors for specific criteria concerning the design and performance. □ Proprietary biotreatment may include specific media to address pollutants of concern. However, for proprietary device to be considered a biotreatment device the media must be capable of supporting rigorous growth of vegetation. □ Proprietary systems must be acceptable to the reviewing agency. Reviewing agencies shall have the discretion to request performance information. Reviewing agencies shall have the discretion to deny the use of a proprietary BMP on the grounds of performance, maintenance considerations, or other relevant factors. Also known as: ¾Catch basin planter box ¾Bioretention vault ¾Tree box filter TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-70 December 20, 2013 □ In right of way areas, plant selection should not impair traffic lines of site. Local jurisdictions may also limit plant selection in keeping with landscaping themes. Computing Sizing Criteria for Proprietary Biotreatment Device x Proprietary biotreatment devices can be volume based or flow-based BMPs. x Volume-based proprietary devices should be sized using the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1 or the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs described in Appendix III.3.2. x The required design flowrate for flow-based proprietary devices should be computed using the Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-based BMPs described in Appendix III.3.3). In South Orange County, the provided ponding plus pore volume must be checked to demonstrate that it is greater than 0.75 of the remaining DCV that this BMP is designed to address. Many propretary biotreatment BMPs will not be able to meet the definition of “biofiltration” that applies in South Orange County. See Section III.7 and Worksheet SOC-1. Additional References for Design Guidance x Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 4: http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850 x Los Angeles County Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual, Chapter 9: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/DES/design_manuals/StormwaterBMPDesignandMaintenance.pdf x Santa Barbara BMP Guidance Manual, Chapter 6: http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/91D1FA75-C185-491E-A882- 49EE17789DF8/0/Manual_071008_Final.pdf Attachment D Reference Material Attachment D Reference Material PROJECT SITE 50 m Report a map errorMap data ©2021 Google GeoTracker  Home  Contact UsSearch for a Project Search for an Address  Download Data  Tools LEGEND - CHOOSE MORE SITES PROJECT SITE Attachment E O peration and Maintenance Plan To be provided during final engineering Attachment E Operation and Maintenance Plan To Be Provided During Final Engineering Attachment F G eotechnical Report Attachment F Geotechnical Report Corona Office Phone: 951.509.7090 CITY VENTURES June 11, 2021 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150 Project No. 1‐0386 Irvine, California 92612 Attention: Ms. Megan Moore Subject: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Anaheim 2 Project, APN: 271‐071‐07, ‐08 and ‐10 City of Anaheim, California References: See Appendix A Dear Ms. Moore: Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta) is pleased to present this geotechnical investigation for the proposed Anaheim 2 project, APNs: 271‐071‐07, ‐08 and ‐10, located northwest of the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, California. This report is based on a recent subsurface investigation conducted by Alta, laboratory testing, review of the conceptual site plan and a review of the referenced reports. Alta’s review of the data indicates that the proposed development is feasible, from a geotechnical perspective, provided that the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the grading and improvement plans and implemented during site development. Also included in this report are:  Discussion of the site geotechnical conditions.  Recommendations for remedial and site grading, including unsuitable soil removals.  Geotechnical site construction recommendations.  Foundation design parameters. Project Number 1‐0386 Page ii June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. If you have any questions or should you require any additional information, please contact the undersigned at (951) 509‐7090. Alta appreciates the opportunity to provide geotechnical consulting services for your project. Sincerely, Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. Reviewed By: _______________________________ FERNANDO RUIZ Civil Engineering Associate _______________________________ SCOTT A. GRAY/RGE 2857 Reg. Exp.: 12‐31‐22 Registered Geotechnical Engineer President _______________________________ JAMES COYNE Engineering Geology Associate _________________________________ THOMAS J. MCCARTHY/CEG 2080 Reg. Exp.: 9‐30‐22 Engineering Geologist Vice President Distribution: (1) Addressee FR: JCB: SAG: TJM:‐1‐0386, June 11, 2021 (Geo Investigation, Anaheim 2 Project) Project Number 1‐0386 Page 1 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................4 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Scope of Work ....................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Report Limitations ................................................................................................. 5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................5 2.1 Site Location and Existing Conditions .................................................................... 5 2.2 Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 5 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................................6 3.1 Investigation and Laboratory Testing .................................................................... 6 3.2 Infiltration Testing ................................................................................................. 6 4.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................7 4.1 Geologic and Geomorphic Setting ......................................................................... 7 4.2 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................... 7 4.2.1 Artificial Fill ‐ Undocumented (map symbol afu) ............................ 7 4.2.2 Young Alluvial Fan Deposits (map symbol Qyf) .............................. 8 4.3 Geologic Structure ................................................................................................. 8 4.3.1 Tectonic Framework ...................................................................... 8 4.3.2 Regionally Mapped Active Faults ................................................... 9 4.3.3 Geologic Structure ......................................................................... 9 4.4 Groundwater ......................................................................................................... 9 4.5 Earthquake Hazards ............................................................................................... 9 4.5.1 Local and Regional Faulting ............................................................ 9 4.5.2 Surface Rupture ........................................................................... 10 4.5.3 Seismicity ..................................................................................... 10 4.5.4 Liquefaction ................................................................................. 10 4.5.5 Dry Sand Settlement .................................................................... 11 5.0 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND ANALYSIS .......................................................................11 5.1 Materials Properties ............................................................................................ 11 5.1.1 Excavation Characteristics ............................................................ 11 5.1.2 Compressibility ............................................................................. 11 5.1.3 Hydro‐Consolidation .................................................................... 11 5.1.4 Expansion Potential ...................................................................... 12 5.1.5 Earthwork Adjustments ............................................................... 12 5.1.6 Chemical Analyses ........................................................................ 13 5.2 Engineering Analysis ............................................................................................ 13 5.2.1 Bearing Capacity and Lateral Earth Pressures .............................. 13 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................14 6.1 Remedial Grading Recommendations ................................................................. 14 6.1.1 Site Preparation ........................................................................... 14 Project Number 1‐0386 Page 2 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 6.1.2 Unsuitable Soil Removals ............................................................. 15 6.2 General Earthwork Recommendations ................................................................ 16 6.2.1 Compaction Standards ................................................................. 16 6.2.2 Groundwater/Seepage ................................................................. 16 6.2.3 Documentation of Removals ........................................................ 16 6.2.4 Treatment of Removal Bottoms ................................................... 17 6.2.5 Fill Placement ............................................................................... 17 6.2.6 Moisture Content ......................................................................... 17 6.2.7 Mixing .......................................................................................... 17 6.2.8 Import Soils .................................................................................. 17 6.2.9 Utility Trenches ............................................................................ 18 6.2.10 Backcut Stability ......................................................................... 19 6.3 Storm Water Infiltration Systems ........................................................................ 20 6.4 Boundary Conditions ........................................................................................... 20 7.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................21 7.1 Structural Design ................................................................................................. 21 7.1.1 Foundation Design ....................................................................... 21 7.1.2 Conventional Foundation Systems ............................................... 22 7.1.3 Post‐Tensioned Slabs/Foundation Design Recommendations ..... 23 7.2 Moisture Barrier .................................................................................................. 24 7.3 Seismic Design ..................................................................................................... 24 7.4 Fence and Garden Walls ...................................................................................... 26 7.5 Footing Excavations ............................................................................................. 27 7.6 Retaining Walls .................................................................................................... 27 7.7 Exterior Slabs and Walkways ............................................................................... 28 7.7.1 Subgrade Compaction .................................................................. 29 7.7.2 Subgrade Moisture ....................................................................... 29 7.7.3 Concrete Slab Thickness ............................................................... 29 7.7.4 Concrete Slab Reinforcement ...................................................... 29 7.7.5 Control Joints ............................................................................... 29 7.8 Concrete Design .................................................................................................. 29 7.9 Corrosion ............................................................................................................. 30 7.10 Pavement Design ................................................................................................. 30 8.0 LOT MAINTENANCE ............................................................................................................31 8.1 Lot Drainage ........................................................................................................ 31 8.2 Burrowing Animals .............................................................................................. 32 9.0 FUTURE PLAN REVIEWS .....................................................................................................32 Project Number 1‐0386 Page 3 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 10.0 CLOSURE.............................................................................................................................32 10.1 Geotechnical Review ........................................................................................... 32 10.2 Limitations ........................................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX A: REFERENCES APPENDIX B: SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION APPENDIX C: LABORATORY TESTING APPENDIX D: MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS APPENDIX E: EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS Project Number 1‐0386 Page 4 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The following report presents Alta’s findings, conclusions, and geotechnical recommendations for the proposed Anaheim 2 project, APN: 271‐071‐07, ‐08 and ‐10, located northwest of the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, California. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this report is to examine the existing onsite geotechnical conditions and assess the impacts that the geotechnical conditions may have on the proposed development. The property is depicted on the enclosed Plate 1. This report is suitable for use in developing grading plans and engineer’s cost estimates. 1.2 Scope of Work Alta’s Scope of Work for this geotechnical investigation included the following:  Reviewing the referenced reports and air photos (Appendix A).  Site geologic mapping.  Excavating, logging, and sampling five (5) hollow‐stem auger borings to a maximum depth of 26‐feet below the existing surface (Appendix B).  Conducting laboratory testing on samples obtained during our investigation (Appendix C).  Performing an infiltration study on two (2) additional borings to provide an assessment of the infiltration characteristics of the onsite soil and their impact on storm water disposal.  Evaluating engineering geologic and geotechnical engineering data, including laboratory data, to develop recommendations for site remedial grading including specialized grading techniques for unsuitable soil removals along the property boundary, import soil, foundations and utilities.  Preparing this report and accompanying exhibits. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 5 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 1.3 Report Limitations The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the field and laboratory information generated during this investigation, and a review of the referenced reports. The information contained in this report is intended to be used for development of grading plans and preliminary construction cost estimates. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Existing Conditions The irregular‐shaped approximately 1.75‐acre site is relatively flat and is currently occupied by three commercial structures and asphalt paving. The site is bounded to the south by Victor Avenue and a commercial property, to the west by residential properties, to the north by a commercial property, and to the east by Harbor Boulevard and a commercial property. Historic aerial photographs indicate that by 1963 the site was developed for commercial purposes. The site has remained relatively unchanged since then. 2.2 Proposed Development Based on our review of the Conceptual Site Plan, the existing parking lot will be demolished, and the site will be redeveloped to support six (6) multi‐family residential structures (31 units), an amenity area and associated streets and drives (Plate 1). Alta anticipates that grading techniques will be used to develop the site to support the proposed structures with shallow foundations and reinforced concrete slabs‐on‐grade, and associated improvements. Significant height slopes are not anticipated for the project. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 6 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION 3.1 Investigation and Laboratory Testing Alta conducted a subsurface investigation on May 19, 2021 consisting of the excavation, logging and select sampling of five (5) hollow‐stem auger borings up to a maximum depth of 26 feet and the installation of two (2) five feet deep wells for infiltration testing. The locations of the exploratory excavations are shown on Plate 1 and the boring logs are presented in Appendix B. Laboratory testing was performed on bulk and ring samples obtained during the field investigation. A brief description of the laboratory test procedures and the test results are presented in Appendix C. 3.2 Infiltration Testing It is Alta’s understanding that the project may utilize infiltration systems for storm water disposal. Details of the system are not known at this time. Infiltration testing was undertaken using two (2) five‐foot‐deep borings (P‐1 and P‐2). The testing was performed in general accordance with the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document. The two test wells were presoaked at least 24 hours prior to testing. During testing, the water level readings were recorded every 10 minutes until the readings stabilized. The data was then adjusted to provide an infiltration rate utilizing the Porchet Method. The resulting infiltration rates are presented in Table 3‐1. The results do not include a factor of safety. Recommendations for infiltration BMP design are presented in Section 6.2. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 7 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Table 3‐1‐Summary of Infiltration Testing (No Factor of Safety) Test Designation P‐1 P‐2 Approximate Depth of Test 5 ft 5 ft Time Interval 10 minutes 10 minutes Radius of Test Hole 4 inches 4 inches Tested Infiltration Rate 7.8 (in/hr) 10.5 (in/hr) 4.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Geologic and Geomorphic Setting Regionally, the subject site is located in the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province, which characterizes the southwest portion of southern California where right lateral major active fault zones predominately trend northwest‐ southeast. The Peninsular Ranges province is composed of plutonic and metamorphic rock, with lesser amounts of Tertiary volcanic and sedimentary rock, Quaternary drainage in‐fills and sedimentary veneers. 4.2 Stratigraphy Based on our literature review and subsurface investigation, the site is underlain by undocumented artificial fill and young alluvial fan deposits. These geologic units are briefly described below. 4.2.1 Artificial Fill ‐ Undocumented (map symbol afu) The undocumented artificial fill observed at the site consists mainly of brown silty sand in a moist, medium dense condition. The unit was logged to a depth of up to 2.0 feet below the ground surface and is underlain by young alluvial fan deposits. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 8 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 4.2.2 Young Alluvial Fan Deposits (map symbol Qyf) The young alluvial fan deposits observed at the site consists mainly of light brown to brown sand, sandy silt and clayey silt in a slightly moist to moist, medium dense/stiff to very dense/very stiff condition. The unit was logged to a depth of 26 feet below the ground surface. 4.3 Geologic Structure 4.3.1 Tectonic Framework Jennings (1985) defined eight structural provinces within California that have been classified by predominant regional fault trends and similar fold structure. These provinces are in turn divided into blocks and sub‐blocks that are defined by “major Quaternary faults.” These blocks and sub‐ blocks exhibit similar structural features. Within this framework, the subject site is located within Structural Province I, which is controlled by the dominant northwest trend of the San Andreas Fault and is divided into two blocks, the Coast Range Block and the Peninsular Range Block. The Peninsular Range Block, on which this site is located, is characterized by a series of parallel, northwest trending faults that exhibit right lateral dip‐slip movement. These faults are terminated by the Transverse Range block to the north and extend southward into the Baja Peninsula. These northwest trending faults divide the Peninsular Range block into eight sub‐blocks. The site is located on the northwest portion of the Santa Ana Sub‐block, one of the eight sub‐blocks, which is bound on the east by the Elsinore fault zone and on the west by the Newport‐Inglewood fault zone. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 9 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 4.3.2 Regionally Mapped Active Faults Several large, active fault systems including the Elsinore‐Whittier, Newport‐Inglewood, and the San Andreas occur in the region surrounding the site. These fault systems have been studied extensively and in a large part control the geologic structure of southern California. 4.3.3 Geologic Structure Based upon our site investigation and literature review, the sediments are of Quaternary age, and are not folded or faulted. 4.4 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface investigation. Based on state‐provided information, the historic‐high groundwater is greater than 50‐ feet below the ground surface (CDMG, 1997). Groundwater data from a nearby well (State Well No. 04S10W04R001S), at elevation 153.08‐ft, showed that groundwater was greater than 100 feet below the ground surface in October of 2000. 4.5 Earthquake Hazards The subject site is located in southern California, which is a tectonically active area. The type and magnitude of seismic hazards affecting a site are dependent on the distance to the causative fault and the intensity and magnitude of the seismic event. The seismic hazard may be primary, such as surface rupture and/or ground shaking, or secondary, such as liquefaction and/or ground lurching. 4.5.1 Local and Regional Faulting The site is located on the western portion of the Santa Ana sub‐block, where the Coyote Hills, Elsinore, Puente Hills, San Joaquin Hills and Newport‐Inglewood faults surround the site approximately 1.5, 6.6, 7.7, 10.7, and 11.8 miles away, respectively. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 10 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 4.5.2 Surface Rupture Active faults are not known to exist within the project and a review of Special Publication 42 indicates the site is not within a California State designated earthquake fault zone. Accordingly, the potential for fault surface rupture on the subject site is very low. 4.5.3 Seismicity Ground shaking hazards caused by earthquakes along other active regional faults do exist. The 2019 California Building Code requires use‐ modified spectral accelerations and velocities for most structural designs. Seismic design parameters using soil profile types identified in the 2019 California Building Code are presented in Section 7.3. 4.5.4 Liquefaction Seismic agitation of relatively loose saturated sands, silty sands, and some silts can result in a buildup of pore pressure. If the pore pressure exceeds the overburden stresses, a temporary quick condition known as liquefaction can occur. Liquefaction effects can manifest in several ways including: 1) loss of bearing; 2) lateral spread; 3) dynamic settlement; and 4) flow failure. Lateral spreading has typically been the most damaging mode of failure. In general, the more recent that a sediment has been deposited, the more likely it will be susceptible to liquefaction. Other factors that must be considered are groundwater, confining stresses, relative density, and the intensity and duration of seismically induced ground shaking. Based on the depth to groundwater, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction to occur onsite is considered nil. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 11 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 4.5.5 Dry Sand Settlement Dry sand settlement is the process of non‐uniform settlement of the ground surface during a seismic event. Based on our subsurface investigation and our removal/recompaction recommendations, the potential for dry sand settlement is anticipated to be low and within foundation design tolerances. Design dynamic settlement parameters are presented in Table 7‐1. 5.0 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND ANALYSIS 5.1 Materials Properties Presented herein is a general discussion of the engineering properties of the onsite materials that will be encountered during construction of the proposed project. Descriptions of the soil (Unified Soil Classification System) are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B. 5.1.1 Excavation Characteristics Based on the data provided from the subsurface investigations, it is our opinion that the majority of the onsite materials possess favorable excavation characteristics such that conventional earth moving equipment can be utilized. 5.1.2 Compressibility The artificial fill and upper portions of the young alluvial fan deposits onsite are considered compressible and unsuitable to support the proposed improvements. Recommended removal depths are presented in Section 6.1.2. 5.1.3 Hydro‐Consolidation Hydro‐consolidation is the effect of introducing water into soil that is prone to collapse. Upon loading and initial wetting, the soil structure and apparent strength are altered resulting in almost immediate settlement. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 12 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. That settlement can have adverse impacts on engineered structures, particularly in areas where it is manifested differentially. Differential settlements are typically associated with differential wetting, irregularities in the subsurface soil conditions, or irregular loading patterns. Based on our laboratory testing (Appendix C), there is a minimal potential for hydro‐collapse in the younger fan deposits onsite. 5.1.4 Expansion Potential Expansion index testing was performed on samples taken during our subsurface investigation. Based on the results, it is anticipated that the majority of materials onsite are “very low” to “low” in expansion potential (0≤EI≤50, Appendix C) when tested per ASTM D: 4829. 5.1.5 Earthwork Adjustments The values presented in Table 5‐1 are deemed appropriate for estimating purposes and may be used in an effort to balance earthwork quantities. As is the case with every project, contingencies should be made to adjust the earthwork balance when grading is in‐progress and actual conditions are better defined. TABLE 5‐1 Earthwork Adjustment Factors Geologic Unit Adjustment Factor Range Average Artificial Fill‐ Undocumented/Younger Fan Deposits Shrink 6% to 10% 8% Project Number 1‐0386 Page 13 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5.1.6 Chemical Analyses Chemical testing was performed on samples of material underlying the proposed site. Soluble sulfate test results indicate that the soluble sulfate concentrations of the soils tested are classified as negligible (Category S0) per ACI 318‐14. Negligible chloride levels were detected in the onsite soils. Resistivity testing conducted as part of this investigation, indicates that the soils are mildly corrosive to buried metals (per Romanoff, 1989). Additional discussions on corrosion are presented in Section 7.9. Corrosion tests results are presented in Appendix C. 5.2 Engineering Analysis Presented below is a general discussion of the engineering analysis methods that were utilized to develop the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. 5.2.1 Bearing Capacity and Lateral Earth Pressures Ultimate bearing capacity values were obtained using the graphs and formula presented in NAVFAC DM‐7.1. Allowable bearing was determined by applying a factor of safety of at least 3 to the ultimate bearing capacity. Static lateral earth pressures were calculated using Rankine methods for active and passive cases. If it is desired to use Coulomb forces, a separate analysis specific to the application can be conducted. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 14 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on Alta’s findings during our subsurface investigation, the laboratory test results, our staff’s previous experience in the area, it is Alta’s opinion that the development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical perspective. Presented below are recommendations that should be incorporated into site development and construction plans. 6.1 Remedial Grading Recommendations All grading shall be accomplished under the observation and testing of the project geotechnical consultant in accordance with the recommendations contained herein and the City of Anaheim criteria. 6.1.1 Site Preparation Vegetation, construction debris, and other deleterious materials are unsuitable as structural fill material and should be disposed of off‐site prior to commencing grading/construction. Any septic tanks, seepage pits or wells should be abandoned as per the County of Orange Department of Health Services. Existing concrete should be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill. The demolished concrete may be incorporated into compacted, engineered fills after it is crushed to a maximum size of six (6) inches. Prior to placement as engineered fill any protruding steel rebar should be cut from the concrete pieces and disposed of offsite. Existing asphaltic concrete should be removed prior to the placement of engineered fill. From a geotechnical perspective, this material may be incorporated into compacted, engineered fills after it is crushed to a maximum size of six (6) inches. The crushed asphalt should not be placed under residential structures, but rather, it can be placed in approved non‐ Project Number 1‐0386 Page 15 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. residential areas, such as streets, parking areas or open space. These recommendations should be verified by the environmental consultant. 6.1.2 Unsuitable Soil Removals The artificial fill and the upper portions of the young alluvial fan deposits near the surface are compressible and as such, are not suitable to support the proposed structures. It is anticipated that, on average, the upper five (5) feet of existing soils will require removal and recompaction, extending a minimum of five (5) feet horizontally outside the structures. This recommended removal combined with the foundation recommendations presented in Section 7.1 should provide suitable support for the proposed structures. Footings for structures should be underlain by a minimum of two (2) feet of compacted fill. As such, for building pads where unsuitable soil removals do not provide the minimum depth of compacted fill, or where design grades and/or remedial grading activities create cut/fill transitions, the cut and shallow fill portions of the building pads should be over‐excavated during grading and replaced with compacted fill. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should observe the removal bottom prior to placing fill. If unsuitable soils such as undocumented artificial fill is exposed upon the completion of the removals recommended above, additional removals may be required. For fill areas in streets, in general, a minimum removal and recompaction of the upper two (2) feet is recommended, however all undocumented artificial fill shall be removed and recompacted. For cuts greater than two (2) feet in street areas, removals are not required. For cuts less than two (2) feet, the two (2) foot removal and recompaction applies. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 16 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Material removed as part of the unsuitable soil removals can be used as artificial fill, provided it is free of deleterious materials. 6.2 General Earthwork Recommendations 6.2.1 Compaction Standards All fill and processed natural ground shall be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, as determined by ASTM Test Method: D‐1557. Fill material should be moisture conditioned to optimum moisture or above, and as generally discussed in Alta’s Earthwork Specification Section presented in Appendix E. Compaction shall be achieved with the use of sheepsfoot rollers or similar kneading type equipment. Mixing and moisture conditioning will be required in order to achieve the recommended moisture conditions. 6.2.2 Groundwater/Seepage It is anticipated that groundwater will not be encountered during construction. It is possible that perched water conditions could be encountered depending on the time of year construction occurs. 6.2.3 Documentation of Removals All removal/over‐excavation bottoms should be observed and approved by the project Geotechnical Consultant prior to fill placement. Consideration should be given to surveying the removal bottoms and undercuts after approval by the geotechnical consultant and prior to the placement of fill. Staking should be provided in order to verify undercut locations and depths. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 17 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 6.2.4 Treatment of Removal Bottoms At the completion of removals/over‐excavation, the exposed removal bottom should be ripped to a minimum depth of eight (8) inches, moisture‐conditioned to above optimum moisture content and compacted in‐place to the project standards. 6.2.5 Fill Placement After removals, scarification, and compaction of in‐place materials are completed, additional fill may be placed. Fill should be placed in eight‐ inch bulk maximum lifts, moisture conditioned to optimum moisture content or above, compacted and tested as grading/construction progresses until final grades are attained. 6.2.6 Moisture Content The moisture content of the upper in‐situ soils is below optimum, as shown on the boring logs in Appendix B. Moisture conditioning will be required during grading to achieve optimum or above conditions. 6.2.7 Mixing Mixing of materials may be necessary to prevent layering of different soil types and/or different moisture contents. The mixing should be accomplished prior to and as part of compaction of each fill lift. 6.2.8 Import Soils Import soils, if necessary, should consist of clean, structural quality, compactable materials similar to the on‐site soils and should be free of trash, debris, or other objectionable materials. The project Geotechnical Consultant should be notified not less than 72 hours in advance of the locations of any soils proposed for import. Import sources should be sampled, tested, and approved by the project Geotechnical Consultant at the source prior to the importation of the soils to the site. The project Project Number 1‐0386 Page 18 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Civil Engineer should include these requirements on plans and specifications for the project. 6.2.9 Utility Trenches 6.2.9.1 Excavation Utility trenches should be supported, either by laying back excavations or shoring, in accordance with applicable OSHA standards. In general, existing site soils are classified as Soil Type “B” and "C" per OSHA standards. Upon completion of the recommended removals and recompaction, the artificial fill will be classified as Soil Type "B". The Project Geotechnical Consultant should be consulted if geologic conditions vary from what is presented in this report. 6.2.9.2 Backfill Trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D‐1557. Onsite soils will not be suitable for use as bedding material but will be suitable for use in backfill provided oversized materials are removed. No surcharge loads should be imposed above excavations. This includes spoil piles, lumber, concrete trucks, or other construction materials and equipment. Drainage above excavations should be directed away from the banks. Care should be taken to avoid saturation of the soils. Compaction should be accomplished by mechanical means. Jetting of native soils will not be acceptable. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 19 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Under‐slab trenches should also be compacted to project specifications. If select granular backfill (SE > 30) is used, compaction by flooding will be acceptable. 6.2.10 Backcut Stability Temporary backcuts, if required during unsuitable soil removals, should be made no steeper than 1:1 without review and approval of the geotechnical consultant. Flatter backcuts may be necessary where geologic conditions dictate and where minimum width dimensions are to be maintained. Care should be taken during remedial grading operations in order to minimize risk of failure. Should failure occur, complete removal of the disturbed material will be required. In consideration of the inherent instability created by temporary construction backcuts for removals, it is imperative that grading schedules are coordinated to minimize the unsupported exposure time of these excavations. Once started, these excavations and subsequent fill operations should be maintained to completion without intervening delays imposed by avoidable circumstances. In cases where five‐day workweeks comprise a normal schedule, grading should be planned to avoid exposing at‐grade or near‐grade excavations through a non‐work weekend. Where improvements may be affected by temporary instability, either on or offsite, further restrictions such as slot cutting, extending workdays, implementing weekend schedules, and/or other requirements considered critical to serving specific circumstances may be imposed. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 20 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 6.3 Storm Water Infiltration Systems From a geotechnical perspective, allowing storm water to infiltrate the onsite soil in concentrated areas increases the potential for settlement, liquefaction, and water‐related damage to structures/improvements, such as wet slabs or pumping subgrade, and should be avoided where possible. If infiltration systems are required on this site, care should be taken in designing systems that control the storm water as much as possible. Preliminary infiltration testing was conducted at the site as part of this investigation, and the methodology is discussed in 3.2. The resulting infiltration rates for P‐1 and P‐2 were calculated to be 7.8‐inches per hour and 10.5‐inches per hour, respectively. The results do not include a factor of safety. Test P‐1 and P‐2 were conducted in sand lenses of the young alluvial fan deposits. Tests P‐1 and P‐2 were conducted at approximately 5‐feet below the ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered during our investigation at a depth of approximately 26 feet below the ground surface. The historic high ground water is greater than 50 feet below the ground surface (CDMG, 1997). Nearby groundwater wells indicate groundwater is deeper than 100‐feet. Based on the infiltration rates of the underlying soil, infiltration‐type WQMP’s are likely feasible for project within the depths tested. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should review the final WQMP design prior to construction. 6.4 Boundary Conditions The site is bounded to the south by Victor Avenue and a commercial property, to the west by residential properties, to the north by a commercial property, and the east by Harbor Boulevard and a commercial property. Construction of retaining/screen walls along these boundaries may require additional geotechnical recommendations concerning unsuitable soil removals and Project Number 1‐0386 Page 21 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. foundation design parameters. Boundary conditions for the project should be reviewed by the Project Geotechnical Consultant as the design progresses. 7.0 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 Structural Design It is anticipated that multi‐story wood‐framed residential structures with slab on‐ grade and shallow foundations will be constructed. Upon the completion of rough grading, finish grade samples should be collected and tested in order to provide specific recommendations as they relate to the individual building pads. These test results and corresponding design recommendations should be presented in a final rough grading report. Final slab and foundation design recommendations should be made based upon specific structure sitings, loading conditions, and as‐graded soil conditions. It is anticipated that the majority of onsite soils will possess “very low” to “low” expansion potential when tested in general accordance with ASTM Test Method D: 4829. For budgeting purposes, the following foundation design requirements for this range of potential expansion characteristics are presented. 7.1.1 Foundation Design Foundations may be preliminary designed based on the values presented in Table 7‐1 below. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 22 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Table 7‐1 Foundation Design Parameters* Allowable Bearing 2000 lbs/ft2 (assuming a minimum embedment depth and width of 12 inches) Lateral Bearing 250 lbs/ft2 at a depth of 12 inches plus 250 lbs/ft2 for each additional 12 inches of embedment to a maximum of 2000 lbs/ft2. Sliding Coefficient 0.30 Settlement Static Settlement – 0.5 inch in 40 feet Dynamic Settlement – 0.5 inches in 40 feet *These values may be increased as allowed by Code to resist transient loads such as wind or seismic. Building code and structural design considerations may govern depth and reinforcement requirements and should be evaluated. 7.1.2 Conventional Foundation Systems Based on the onsite soils conditions and information supplied by the 2019 CBC, conventional foundation systems may be designed in accordance with Tables 7‐1 and 7‐2. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 23 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 7‐2 CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATION DESIGN PARAMETERS Expansion Potential Very Low to Low Soil Category I Design Plasticity Index 10 Minimum Footing Embedment 12 inches* *The minimum footing embedments presented herein are based on expansion indexes. The structural engineer should determine minimum embedments based on the number of floors supported by the footings, the structural loading, and the requirements of the latest California Building Code. Minimum Footing Width 12‐inches‐The structural engineer should determine the minimum footing width based on loading and the latest California Building Code. Footing Reinforcement No. 4 rebar, one (1) on top, one (1) on bottom Slab Thickness 4 inches (actual) Slab Reinforcement No. 3 rebar spaced 18 inches on center, each way Under‐Slab Requirement See Section 7.2 Slab Subgrade Moisture Minimum of 110 percent of optimum moisture to a depth of 12 inches prior to placing concrete. Footing Embedment Adjacent to Swales and Slopes If exterior footings adjacent to drainage swales are to exist within five (5) feet horizontally of the swale, the footing should be embedded sufficiently to assure embedment below the swale bottom is maintained. Footings adjacent to slopes should be embedded such that at least five‐ (5) feet is provided horizontally from edge of the footing to the face of the slope. Garages A grade beam reinforced continuously with the garage footings shall be constructed across the garage entrance, tying together the ends of the perimeter footings and between individual spread footings. This grade beam should be embedded at the same depth as the adjacent perimeter footings. A thickened slab, separated by a cold joint from the garage beam, should be provided at the garage entrance. Minimum dimensions of the thickened edge shall be six (6) inches deep. Footing depth, width and reinforcement should be the same as the structure. Slab thickness, reinforcement and under‐slab treatment should be the same as the structure. 7.1.3 Post‐Tensioned Slabs/Foundation Design Recommendations Post‐tensioned slabs for the project may be designed utilizing the parameters presented in Tables 7‐1 and 7‐3. The parameters presented herein are based on methodology provided in the Design of Post‐ Tensioned Slabs‐On‐Ground, Third Edition, by the Post‐Tensioning Institute, in accordance with the 2019 CBC. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 24 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 7‐3 POST‐TENSION SLAB DESIGN PARAMETERS Category Expansion Potential Minimum Embedment* Edge Lift Center Lift Project Number 1‐0386 Page 25 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. (https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/index.php) and the USGS National Seismic Hazard Map source model was utilized to perform the analysis. The site class was determined based on the referenced reports and published geologic maps in the area in general conformance with Chapter 20 of ASCE 7‐16. Based on density of the underlying soil, a Site Class of D was selected (shear wave velocity of 259 m/s). Probabilistic (MCER) ground motions were determined in accordance with Method 2 of Section 21.2.1 of ACE 7‐16. The site specific MCER was taken as the lesser of the probabilistic and deterministic ground motions. The design response spectrum was determined per Section 21.3 of ASCE 7‐16. Design acceleration parameters were determined per Section 21.4 of ASCE 7‐16 and the results are presented in Table 7‐4. These parameters should be verified by the structural engineer. Additional parameters should be determined by the structural engineer based on the Occupancy Category of the proposed structures. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 26 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 7‐4 Seismic Ground Motion Values 2019 CBC and ASCE 7‐16 Parameter Value Site Class D Site Latitude 33.8499 Site Longitude ‐117.9248 Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SS 1.534 Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, S1 0.541 Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv (Per Table 11.4‐2 of ASCE 7‐16. Site Specific Parameters Govern) 1.75 Site Specific Parameters Per Chapter 21 of ASCE 7‐16 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SMS 1.534 MCE Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SM1 1.17 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SDS 1.023 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SD1 0.78 Peak Ground Acceleration, PGAM 0.72 7.4 Fence and Garden Walls Block walls, if used, should be embedded a minimum of 2 feet below the lowest adjacent grade. Construction joints (not more than 20 feet apart) should be included in the block wall construction. Side yard walls should be structurally separated from the rear yard wall. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 27 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 7.5 Footing Excavations Soils from the footing excavations should not be placed in slab‐on‐grade areas unless properly compacted and tested. The excavations should be cleaned of all loose/sloughed materials and be neatly trimmed at the time of concrete placement. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should observe the footing excavations prior to the placement of concrete to determine that the excavations are founded in suitably compacted material. 7.6 Retaining Walls Retaining walls should be founded on engineered fill and should be backfilled with granular soils that allow for drainage behind the wall. Foundations may be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in Table 7‐1, above. Unrestrained walls, free to horizontally move 0.0005H (for dense cohesionless backfill), may be designed to resist lateral pressures imposed by a fluid with a unit weight determined in accordance with the Table 7‐5 below. The table also presents design parameters for restrained (at‐rest) retaining walls. These parameters may be used to design retaining walls that may be considered as restrained due to the method of construction or location (corner sections of unrestrained retaining walls). TABLE 7‐5 Equivalent Fluid Pressures for 90% Compacted Fill (Select Material) Backfill Active Pressure (psf/ft) At‐Rest Pressure (psf/ft) Level 35 55 Per the requirements of the 2019 CBC, the seismic force acting on the retaining walls with backfill exceeding 6‐feet in height may be resolved utilizing the formula 15H2 lb/lineal ft (H=height of the wall). This force acts at approximately 0.6H above the base of the wall. The seismic value can be converted as required by Project Number 1‐0386 Page 28 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. the retaining wall engineer. Retaining walls should be designed in general accordance with Section 1807A.2 of the 2019 CBC.  Restrained retaining walls should be designed for “at‐rest” conditions.  The design loads presented in the above table are to be applied on the retaining wall in a horizontal fashion and as such friction between wall and retained soils should not be allowed in the retaining wall analyses.  Additional allowances should be made in the retaining wall design to account for the influence of construction loads, temporary loads, and possible nearby structural footing loads.  Select backfill should be granular, structural quality backfill with a Sand Equivalent of 20 or better and an ASCE Expansion Index of 20 or less. The backfill must encompass the full active wedge area. The upper one foot of backfill should be comprised of native on‐site soils (see Plate A).  The wall design should include waterproofing (where appropriate) and backdrains or weep holes for relieving possible hydrostatic pressures. The backdrain should be comprised of a 4‐inch perforated PVC pipe in a 1 ft. by 1 ft., ¾‐inch gravel matrix, wrapped with a geofabric. The backdrain should be installed with a minimum gradient of 2 percent and should be outletted to an appropriate location. For subterranean walls this may include drainage by sump pumps.  No backfill should be placed against concrete until minimum design strengths are achieved. It should be noted that the allowable bearing and lateral bearing values presented in Table 7‐1 are based on level conditions at the toe. Modified design parameters can be presented for retaining walls with sloping condition at the toe. Other conditions should be evaluated on a case by case basis. 7.7 Exterior Slabs and Walkways Exterior concrete slabs and walkways should be designed and constructed in consideration of the following recommendations. RETAINING WALL BACKFILL DETAIL NATIVE BACKFILL 12 tN. MtN. *OR AS MODIFIED BY A SPECIFIC REPORT DRAIN I.ATERALLY, OR PROVIDE WEEP HOLES AS REQUIRED TO DMIN PIPE: 4-INCH PERFORATED PVC, SCHEDULE 40, SDR35 OR APPROVED ALTERNATE MINIMUM 8 PERFORATIONS (1/4-IN. DIA.) PER LINEAL FT. IN BOTTOM HALF OF PIPE ROCK: MINIMUM VOLUME OF 1 CU. FT. OF 3/4_IN. MAX. ROCK PER. LINEAL FOOT OF PIPE, OR APPROVED ALTERNATE FILTER FABRIC: MIRAFI 140 FILTER FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT "64 ALTA cALTFoRNTA eEorEcl{NrcAL, tNc, 'vER, tTto PI-ATE A PATH: S\Drofllns\ALTA GEoTECHNICAI\GRAoING DETAIIS\PLATE A.dws Project Number 1‐0386 Page 29 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 7.7.1 Subgrade Compaction The subgrade below exterior concrete slabs should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM Test Method: D 1557. 7.7.2 Subgrade Moisture The subgrade below concrete slabs should be moisture conditioned to a minimum of 110 percent of optimum moisture prior to concrete placement. 7.7.3 Concrete Slab Thickness Concrete flatwork and driveways should be designed utilizing four‐inch minimum thickness. 7.7.4 Concrete Slab Reinforcement Utilization of reinforcement for flatwork and driveways is subject to a cost/benefit analysis. Reinforcement will decrease the amount of cracking that may occur in flatwork, however, planning for occasional repairs may be more cost effective. Utilizing closely spaced control joints is likely more cost‐effective than utilizing reinforcement. The majority of the soils onsite are classified as very low in expansion potential. Consideration should be given to reinforcing flatwork with irregular (non‐ square/rectangular) shapes. 7.7.5 Control Joints Weakened plane joints should be installed on walkways at intervals of approximately eight feet (maximum) or less. Exterior slabs should be designed to withstand shrinkage of the concrete. 7.8 Concrete Design As stated in Section 5.1.6, negligible concentrations of sulfates were detected in the onsite soils (Class S0). Therefore, the use of sulfate resistant concrete is not Project Number 1‐0386 Page 30 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. required per ACI 318‐14 at this time. Post‐grading conditions should be evaluated, and final recommendations made at that time. 7.9 Corrosion Based on preliminary testing, the onsite soils are mildly corrosive to buried metal objects. Buried ferrous metals should be protected against the effects of corrosive soils in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Typical measures may include using non‐corrosive backfill, protective coatings, wrapping, plastic pipes, or a combination of these methods. A corrosion engineer should be consulted if specific design recommendations are required by the improvement designer. Per ACI 318‐14, an exposure class of C1 would be applicable to metals encased in concrete (rebar in footings) due to being exposed to moisture from surrounding soils. Per Table 19.3.2.1 of ACI 318‐14, the requirements for concrete with an exposure class of C1 are a minimum compressive strength of 2500 psi and a maximum water‐soluble chloride ion content in concrete of 0.30 (percent by weight of cement). 7.10 Pavement Design Pavement sections for the proposed streets shall be designed based on laboratory testing conducted on samples taken from the soil subgrade. Preliminarily, based on an assumed R‐Value of 30, the pavement may be designed utilizing the sections presented in Table 7‐6. These sections should be verified upon the completion of grading, based on R‐Value testing. The ultimate pavement section design for public streets is under the City of Anaheim’s purview. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 31 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Table 7‐6 Preliminary Pavement Sections Traffic Index Pavement Section Options OR 5.0 3‐inch AC on 6‐inch AB 4‐inch AC on 4‐inch AB 5.5 3‐inch AC on 7‐inch AB 4‐inch AC on 5‐inch AB 6.0 3.5‐inch AC on 7.5‐inch AB 4‐inch AC on 6.5‐inch AB AC‐Asphalt Concrete AB‐Caltrans Class II Base Construction of the streets should be accomplished in accordance with the current criteria of the City of Anaheim. Prior to the placement of base material, the subgrade should be suitably moisture conditioned, processed and compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the laboratory maximum density (ASTM: D 1557) to at least twelve (12) inches below subgrade. After subgrade compaction, the exposed grade should then be "proof"‐rolled with heavy equipment to ensure the grade does not "pump" and is verified as non‐yielding. Aggregate base material should be placed on the compacted subgrade and compacted in‐place to a minimum 95 percent of the laboratory standard obtained per ASTM: D 1557. 8.0 LOT MAINTENANCE Ongoing maintenance of the improvements is essential to the long‐term performance of structures. As such, the owners must implement certain maintenance procedures. The attached " Maintenance and Improvement Considerations" presented in the Appendix D may be included as part of the sales packet to educate the owners in issues related to drainage, maintenance, improvements, etc. The following recommendations should also be implemented. 8.1 Lot Drainage Roof, pad, and lot drainage should be collected and directed away from structures and slopes and toward approved disposal areas. Design fine grade elevations should be maintained through the life of the structure or if design fine grade elevations are altered, adequate area drains should be installed in order to Project Number 1‐0386 Page 32 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. provide rapid discharge of water, away from structures and slopes. Residents should be made aware that they are responsible for maintenance and cleaning of all drainage terraces, down drains, and other devices that have been installed to promote structure and slope stability. 8.2 Burrowing Animals Owners should undertake a program for the elimination of burrowing animals. 9.0 FUTURE PLAN REVIEWS This report represents a geotechnical review of the site. As the project design for the project progresses, site specific geologic and geotechnical issues should be considered in the design and construction of the project. Consequently, future plan reviews may be necessary. These reviews may include reviews of:  Grading Plans  Foundation Plans  Utility Plans These plans should be forwarded to the project Geotechnical Consultant for review. 10.0 CLOSURE 10.1 Geotechnical Review For the purposes of this report, multiple working hypotheses were established for the project, utilizing the available data and the most probable model is used for the analysis. Future information collected during the proposed grading operations is intended to evaluate the hypothesis and as such, some of the assumptions summarized in this report may need to be changed. Some modifications of the grading recommendations may become necessary, should the conditions encountered in the field differ from the conditions hypothesized in this report. Project Number 1‐0386 Page 33 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Plans and sections of the project specifications should be reviewed by Alta to evaluate conformance with the intent of the recommendations contained in this report. If the project description or final design varies from that described in herein, Alta must be consulted regarding the applicability of the recommendations contained herein and whether any changes are required. Alta accepts no liability for any use of its recommendations if the project description or final design varies and Alta is not consulted regarding the alterations. 10.2 Limitations This report is based on the following: 1) the project as presented on the attached plan; 2) the information obtained from Alta's laboratory testing included herein; and 3) from the information presented in the referenced reports. The findings and recommendations are based on the results of the subsurface investigation, laboratory testing, and office analysis combined with an interpolation and extrapolation of conditions between and beyond the subsurface excavation locations. However, the materials adjacent to or beneath those observed may have different characteristics than those observed, and no precise representations are made as to the quality or extent of the materials not observed. The results reflect an interpretation of the direct evidence obtained. Work performed by Alta has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the geotechnical profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representation, either expressed or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended. The recommendations presented in this report are based on the assumption that an appropriate level of field review will be provided by a geotechnical consultant who is familiar with the design and site geologic conditions. That field review shall be sufficient to confirm that geotechnical and geologic conditions exposed Project Number 1‐0386 Page 34 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. during grading are consistent with the geologic representations and corresponding recommendations presented in this report. The conclusions and recommendations included in this report are applicable to the specific design of this project as discussed in this report. They have no applicability to any other project or to any other location and any and all subsequent users accept any and all liability resulting from any use or reuse of the data, opinions, and recommendations without the prior written consent of Alta. Alta has no responsibility for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, procedures, safety precautions, programs in connection with the construction, acts or omissions of the CONTRACTOR or any other person performing any of the construction, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the construction in accordance with the final design drawings and specifications. ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX A REFERENCES Project Number 1‐0386 Page A‐1 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX A Selected References 1. California Code of Regulations, 2019, California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2, Based on the 2018 International Building Code, Effective Date January 1, 2020. 2. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5‐Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03. 3. California Geological Survey, 2018, Earthquake Fault Zones, A guide for Government Agencies, Property Owners/Developers, and Geoscience Practitioners for Assessing Fault Rupture Hazards in California, Special Publication 42, revised 2018, 83 pages. 4. California Geological Survey, 1999, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Anaheim Quadrangle, Released: April 15, scale 1:24,000. 5. Historic Aerials, 2021, www.historicaerials.com, by NETROnline, Copyright 1999‐2020, accessed June 2021, online review of vintage air photos from 1953, 1963, 1972, 1980, 1995, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016. 6. Jennings, C.W., and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California: California Geological Survey Geologic Data Map No. 6, map scale 1:750,000. 7. Jennings, C. W., and Bryant, W.A., 2010, An explanatory text to accompany the 1:750,000 scale fault and geologic map of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, special publication 42, revised 1985, 24 p. 8. Jennings, C. W., 1985, An explanatory text to accompany the 1:750,000 scale fault and geologic maps of California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 201, 197 p. 9. Romanoff, Melvin, 1989, Underground Corrosion, NBS Circular 579, Reprinted by NACE, Houston, TX, 1989 10. U.S. Geological Survey, 2008, National Seismic Hazards Maps – Source Parameters, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_2008_search/query_main.cfm. ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX B Subsurface Investigation Project Number 1‐0386 Page B‐1 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX B Subsurface Investigation Alta's subsurface investigation consisted of excavating, logging, and sampling five (5) hollow‐ stem auger borings. Details of the subsurface investigation are presented in Table B. The approximate location of the exploratory excavation is shown on the accompanying Plate 1 and the Geotechnical Logs are attached. TABLE B SURFACE INVESTIGATION DETAILS Equipment Range of Depths Sampling Methods Sample Locations Hollow‐ stem auger Up to 26 feet 1. Bulk 2. Ring Samples 1. Bulk‐Select Depths 2. Rings‐Every 2.5 feet or 5 feet UNIFIED SOI L CLASSIFIICATION SYSTEM Major Divisions lfl tr Description Major Divisions an tr Coarse Grained Soils N4ore than 50% retained on No 200 steve Gravel and Sravelly Soils han 50% frachon relained on No, 4 'l ts* ,-l*EIF GW Well-graded grcvels or gravel sand mixtures, little or no fines Fine (lrained isoils l\lore than Silts And Clays LL,<50 n ML Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands or clavev silts with slioht olasticitv GP Poorly-graded gravels or gravel sand mixture, little or no fines CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean claysSilty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures OL Organic silts and organic silt-clays of low plasticity Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay mixtures Silts And Clays LL,<50 MF Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine or silty soils, elastic siltsSand and Sandy Soils than 50% fraclion Passes on No, 4 i'+. 3_'.JV! Well-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines on No 200 steve VH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat claysSP Poorly-graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines SM Silty sands, sarrd-silt mixtures OF Organic clays of medium to high plasticity sc Clayey sands, and-clay mixtures Highly Organic Soils PT Peat and other highly organic soils BoUNDARY CLASSIFICATIoN: Soils possessing characteristics of two groups are designated by combinations of group symbols PARTICLE SIZ:E LIMITS U.S. STANDA,RD SiERIES SIEVE 200 40 10 4 CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENINGS 3t4" 3,, ,t2" LABORATORY TESTS Symbol Tesl DS DSR cc)N SA MAX RV EI SE AL CHEM HY Direct Shear Direct Shear (Remolded) Sieve Analysis Maximum Density Resistance (R) Value Expansion Index Sand Equivalent Atterberg Limits Chemical Analysis Hydrometer Analysis SOIL MOISTURE SIZE PROPORTIONS Trace - <5% Few-5to10% Some - 15 to 25% Increasing \/isual Moisture Content Silts an0 Clays Sand Gravel Cobbles Boulders Fine Medium Coarsi€r Fine Coarse RELATIVE DENSITY Sands and Gravels Blows/Foot (SPT) Very Loose Loose Medium Dense Dense Very Dense <4 4-10 11-30 31 -50 >50 CON SI STENCY C IASSI FI CATI ON Silts and Clays Criteria Very Soft Soft Firm stiff Very Stiff Thumb penetrates soil >1 in. Thumb penetrates soil 1 in, Thumb penetrates soil 1/4 in Readily indented with thumbnail Thumbnail will not indent soil HARDNESS KEY TO EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS} ,n /L>//J, ALTA CALIFORNTA GEOTECHNTCAL tNC. /\PI-ATE B 3.5" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to coarse grained, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, few silt @ 10.0ft. medium grained @ 20.0ft. SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very stiff, fine grained sand @ 25.0ft. trace clay TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED R R R R R R 20 15 36 46 31 14 4.3 2.3 4.7 3.1 19.9 26.1 17 9 22 13 89 96 100 98 105 101 104 96 SM SP ML 5 10 15 20 25 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTH140 lbs. Anaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)B-1PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 30 in. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-1 5" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to coarse grained, brown, slightly moist, medium dense @ 2.5ft. trace silt @ 10.0ft. medium to coarse grained @ 21.0ft. SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very stiff, fine to coarse grained sand @ 25.0ft. fine to medium grained sand TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED R R R R R R 17 23 32 48 20 19 4.3 5.5 3.2 2.9 4.7 19.5 18 22 13 13 19 98 CON, HY 101 99 101 105 100 108 SM SP ML 5 10 15 20 25 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTH140 lbs. Anaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)B-2PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 30 in. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-2 3" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, slightly moist, medium dense, few silt @ 10.0ft. fine to coarse grained, trace silt, trace gravel up to 0.5" in diameter @ 15.0ft. medium to coarse grained, light brown to brown @ 20.0ft. very dense @ 25.0ft. CLAYEY SILT, brown, moist, stiff TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED B R R R R R R 17 17 23 37 64 15 3.8 1.8 6.4 4.7 3.1 21.9 16 12 24 21 14 90 MAX, EI, HY, CHEM CON, HY 102 118 97 103 105 101 SM SP ML 5 10 15 20 25 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTH140 lbs. Anaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)B-3PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 30 in. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-3 5" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to medium grained, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, trace silt @ 5.0ft. medium to coarse grained @ 10.0ft. dense @ 15.0ft. medium dense @ 20.0ft. fine to medium grained, very dense @ 25.0ft. CLAYEY SILT, brown, moist, stiff TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED R R R R R R 12 11 45 25 57 15 4.7 3.5 2.1 5.0 2.7 25.0 24 13 9 25 11 99 109 98 104 108 101 99 SM SP ML 5 10 15 20 25 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTH140 lbs. Anaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)B-4PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 30 in. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-4 5" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to medium grained, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, trace silt @ 5.0ft. fine to coarse grained @ 10.0ft. medium to coarse grained, dense, trace gravel up to 0.5" in diameter @ 15.0ft. fine to coarse grained @ 20.0ft. very dense @ 25.0ft. SANDY SILT, brown, moist, very stiff, few clay, fine grained sand TOTAL DEPTH 26.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED R R R R R R 16 15 46 37 61 23 3.9 2.8 2.4 3.8 3.1 21.0 15 10 11 15 13 98 98 96 104 99 101 106 SM SP ML 5 10 15 20 25 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTH140 lbs. Anaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)B-5PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 30 in. Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-5 5" Asphalt over no Base ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to coarse grained, brown, slightly moist, medium dense @ 2.5ft. trace silt TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SM SP 5 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTHAnaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)P-1PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-6 ARTIFICIAL FILL-UNDOCUMENTED (afu): SILTY SAND, fine to medium grained, brown, moist, medium dense, few gravel up to 0.75" in diameter YOUNG ALLUVIAL FAN DEPOSITS (Qyf): SAND, fine to medium grained, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, trace silt TOTAL DEPTH 5.0 FEET NO GROUNDWATER ENCOUNTERED NO CAVING OBSERVED SM SP 5 TYPE OF DRILL RIG DRILLER SAT-CONT (%)MOISTURE5/19/21 (%)URATIONDATE STARTED 5/19/21 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OTHERSAMPLEELEVDENSITYDRY (pcf)BORING DESIG. DROP DRIVE WT. GW DEPTH (FT) PROJECT NAME DATE FINISHED FR DEPTHAnaheim 2 TESTSS SPT (SPLIT SPOON) SAMPLE R RING (DRIVE) SAMPLE SAMPLE TYPES: SHEET NOTE LOGGED BY GROUPJ: JOINTINGB: BEDDINGS: SHEAR C: CONTACTF: FAULTRS: RUPTURE SURFACE 1-0386 GROUNDWATER SEEPAGE(Feet)P-2PROJECT NO. GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG GROUND ELEV. 8" Hollow Stem Auger 2R Drilling SYMBOLLITHOLOGYBLOWST TUBE SAMPLEB BULK SAMPLETYPE 1 OF 1 Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 PLATE B-7 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX C Laboratory Testing Project Number 1‐0378 Page C‐1 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LABORATORY TESTING The following laboratory tests were performed on a representative sample in accordance with the applicable latest standards or methods from the ASTM, California Building Code (CBC) and California Department of Transportation. Classification Soils were classified with respect to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in accordance with ASTM D‐2487 and D‐2488. Particle Size Analysis Modified hydrometer testing was conducted to aid in classification of the soil. The results of the particle size analysis are presented in Table C. Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of two representative bulk samples were evaluated in accordance with ASTM D‐1557. The results are summarized in Table C. Expansion Index Tests One (1) expansion index test was performed to evaluate the expansion potential of typical on‐ site soil. Testing was carried out in general conformance with ASTM Test Method D‐4829. The results are presented in Table C. Consolidation Tests Consolidation testing was performed on two (2) relatively “undisturbed” soil samples at their natural moisture content in accordance with procedures outlined in ASTM D‐2435. The samples were placed in a consolidometer and loads were applied incrementally in geometric progression. The samples (2.42‐inches in diameter and 1‐inch in height) were permitted to consolidate under each load increment until the slope of the characteristic linear secondary compression portion of the thickness versus log of time plot was apparent. The percent consolidation for each load cycle was recorded as the ratio of the amount of vertical Project Number 1‐0378 Page C‐2 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. compression to the original 1‐inch height. The consolidation test results are shown on Plates C‐ 1 and C‐2. Chemical Analyses Chemical testing was performed on two select samples by Alta. The results of these tests (sulfate content, resistivity, chloride content and pH) are presented on Table C. Boring/Pit No. Depth (Feet) Soil Description Group Symbol - Unified Soil Classification System Maximum Density (pcf) Optimum Moisture (%) Direct Shear Gravel (% + No. 4 Screen) % Sand %Silt (0.074 to 0.005mm) % Clay (-0.005 mm) Expansion IndexSulfate Content (%) Consolidation Other Tests RemarksB-2 5 Sand (Qyf)SP ---2 93 3 2 - - See Plate C-1 - B-3 1-4 Sand (Qyf)SP 113.7 11.6 -1 87 8 4 0 ND - Min. Resistivity: 19,000 OHM-CM Chloride: 5ppm PH: 8.61 B-3 10 Sand (Qyf)SP ---2 85 10 3 - - See Plate C-2 - TABLE C SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA P.N. 1-0386 Maximum Dry Density Grain Size Analysis Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. -2.0 -1.0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 REMARKS: WATER ADDED AT 1.07 TSF CONSOLIDATION CURVEPERCENT CHANGE IN HEIGHTPLATE C-1 COMPRESSIVE STRESS IN TSF satur. (%) 99 -200 Sand (Qyf)SP boring in situ 22 group typical namessymbolsieve (%)density (pcf) 5.5 moist. (%) in situdrydepth (ft.) 5.0B-2 5 Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 -2.0 -1.0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 REMARKS: WATER ADDED AT 1.07 TSF CONSOLIDATION CURVEPERCENT CHANGE IN HEIGHTPLATE C-2 COMPRESSIVE STRESS IN TSF satur. (%) 97 -200 Sand (Qyf)SP boring in situ 24 group typical namessymbolsieve (%)density (pcf) 6.4 moist. (%) in situdrydepth (ft.) 10.0B-3 13 Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. P.N. 1-0386 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX D Maintenance and Improvement Considerations Project Number 1‐0386 Page D‐1 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENT CONSIDERATIONS General Owners purchasing property must assume a certain degree of responsibility for improvements and for maintaining conditions around their home. Of primary importance from a geotechnical standpoint are maintaining drainage patterns and minimizing the soil moisture variation below all improvements. Such design, construction and owner maintenance provisions may include:  Employing contractors for improvements who design and build in recognition of local building codes and specific site soils conditions.  Establishing and maintaining positive drainage away from all foundations, walkways, driveways, patios, and other improvements.  Avoiding the construction of planters adjacent to structural improvements. Alternatively, planter sides/bottoms can be sealed with an impermeable membrane and drained away from the improvements via subdrains into approved disposal areas.  Sealing and maintaining construction/control joints within concrete slabs and walkways to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the subgrade soils.  Utilizing landscaping schemes with vegetation that requires minimal watering. Watering should be done in a uniform manner, as equally as possible on all sides of the foundation, keeping the soil "moist" but not allowing the soil to become saturated.  Maintaining positive drainage away from structures and providing roof gutters on all structures with downspouts that are designed to carry roof runoff directly into area drains or discharged well away from the foundation areas.  Avoiding the placement of trees closer to the proposed structures than a distance of one‐half the mature height of the tree.  Observation of the soil conditions around the perimeter of the structure during extremely hot/dry or unusually wet weather conditions so that modifications can be made in irrigation programs to maintain relatively uniform moisture conditions. Project Number 1‐0386 Page D‐2 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Sulfates Owners should be cautioned against the import and use of certain inorganic fertilizers, soil amendments, and/or other soils from offsite sources in the absence of specific information relating to their chemical composition. Some fertilizers have been known to leach sulfate compounds into soils and increase the sulfate concentrations to potentially detrimental levels. Site Drainage  The owners should be made aware of the potential problems that may develop when drainage is altered through construction of hardscape improvements. Ponded water, drainage over the slope face, leaking irrigation systems, overwatering, or other conditions which could lead to ground saturation must be avoided.  No water should be allowed to flow over the slopes. No alteration of pad gradients should be allowed that would prevent pad and roof runoff from being directed to approved disposal areas.  Drainage patterns have been established at the time of the fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. No alterations to these drainage patterns should be made unless designed by qualified professionals in compliance with local code requirements and site‐specific soils conditions. Slope Drainage  Residents should be made aware of the importance of maintaining and cleaning all interceptor ditches, drainage terraces, down drains, and any other drainage devices, which have been installed to promote slope stability.  Subsurface drainage pipe outlets may protrude through slope surfaces and/or wall faces. These pipes, in conjunction with the graded features, are essential to slope and wall stability and must be protected in‐place. They should not be altered or damaged in any way. Planting and Irrigation of Slopes  Seeding and planting of the slopes should be planned to achieve, as rapidly as possible, a well‐established and deep‐rooted vegetal cover requiring minimal watering.  It is the responsibility of the landscape architect to provide such plants initially and of the residents to maintain such planting. Alteration of such a planting scheme is at the resident's risk. Project Number 1‐0386 Page D‐3 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC.  The resident is responsible for proper irrigation and for maintenance and repair of properly installed irrigation systems. Leaks should be fixed immediately.  Sprinklers should be adjusted to provide maximum uniform coverage with a minimum of water usage and overlap. Overwatering with consequent wasteful runoff and serious ground saturation must be avoided.  If automatic sprinkler systems are installed, their use must be adjusted to account for seasonal and natural rainfall conditions. Burrowing Animals  Residents must undertake a program to eliminate burrowing animals. This must be an ongoing program in order to promote slope stability. Owner Improvement Owner improvements (pools, spas, patio slabs, retaining walls, planters, etc.) should be designed to account for the terrain of the project, as well as expansive soil conditions and chemical characteristics. Design considerations on any given lot may need to include provisions for differential bearing materials, ascending/descending slope conditions, bedrock structure, perched (irrigation) water, special geologic surcharge loading conditions, expansive soil stresses, and long‐term creep/settlement. All owner improvements should be designed and constructed by qualified professionals utilizing appropriate design methodologies, which account for the on‐site soils and geologic conditions. Each lot and proposed improvement should be evaluated on an individual basis. Project Number 1‐0386 Page D‐4 June 11, 2021 ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Setback Zones Manufactured slopes maybe subject to long‐term settlement and creep that can manifest itself in the form of both horizontal and vertical movement. These movements typically are produced as a result of weathering, erosion, gravity forces, and other natural phenomenon. A setback adjacent to slopes is required by most building codes, including the California Building Code. This zone is intended to locate and support the residential structures away from these slopes and onto soils that are not subject to the potential adverse effects of these natural phenomena. The owner may wish to construct patios, walls, walkways, planters, swimming pools, spas, etc. within this zone. Such facilities may be sensitive to settlement and creep and should not be constructed within the setback zone unless properly engineered. It is suggested that plans for such improvements be designed by a professional engineer who is familiar with grading ordinances and design and construction requirements. In addition, we recommend that the designer and contractor familiarize themselves with the site specific geologic and geotechnical conditions on the specific lot. ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC. APPENDIX E Earthwork Specifications Attachment H Educational Materials To be provided during final engineering Please visit http://www.ocwatersheds.com for educational materials as needed G Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Attachment G Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Water Quality Management Plan Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Submission of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City of Anaheim that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”) for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/ her agent) of the site (or a portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Previous Owner/ Previous Responsibility Party Information Company/ Individual Name Contact Person Street Address Title City State Zip Phone II. Information about Site Transferred Name of Project Title of WQMP Applicable to Site: Street Address of Site Tract Number(s) for Site Lot Numbers Date WQMP Prepared (or Revised) III. New Owner/ New Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual Name Contact Person Street Address Title City State Zip Phone IV. Ownership Transfer Information General Description of Site Transferred to New Owner General Description of Portion of Project/ Parcel Subject to WQMP Retained by Owner (if any) Lot/ Tract Number(s) of Site Transferred to New Owner Remaining Lot/ Tract Number(s) to WQMP still held by Owner (if any) Date of Ownership Transfer Note: When the Previous Owner is transferring a Site that is a portion of a larger project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP, as opposed to the entire project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP, the General Description of the Site transferred and the remainder of the project/ parcel no transferred shall be set forth as maps attached to this notice. These maps shall show those portions of the project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP that are transferred to the New Owner (the Transferred Site), those portions retained by the Previous Owner, and those portions previously transferred by the Previous Owner. Those portions retained by the Previous Owner shall be labeled “Previous Owner,” and those portions previously transferred by the Previous Owner shall be labeled as “Previously Transferred.” V. Purpose of Notice of Transfer The purposes of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility are: 1) to track transfer of responsibility for implementation and amendment of the WQMP when property to which the WQMP is transferred from the Previous Owner to the New Owner, and 2) to facilitate notification to a transferee of property subject to a WQMP that such New Owner is now the Responsible Party of record for the WQMP for this portions of the site that it owns. VI. Certifications A. Previous Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am no longer the owner of the Transferred Site as described in Section II above. I have provided the New Owner with a copy of the WQMP applicable to the Transferred Site that the New Owner is acquiring from the New Owner. Print Name of Previous Owner Representative Title Signature of Previous Owner Representative Date B. New Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am the owner of the Transferred Site, as described in Section II above, that I have been provided a copy of the WQMP, and that I have informed myself and understand the New Owner’s responsibilities related to the WQMP, its implementation, and Best Management Practices associated with it. I understand that by signing this notice, the New Owner is accepting all ongoing responsibilities for implementation and amendment of the WQMP for the Transferred Site, which the New Owner has acquired from the Previous Owner. Print Name of New Owner Representative Title Signature of New Owner Representative Date Attachment H 2-Yr 24-Hour Storm Event Calculations DATE: 02/01/2022 DATE: 02/01/2022 PAGE 1 OF 1 CONC. PT.SOIL DEV. Tt Tc I Fm Q FLOW SLOPE V HYDRAULICS AND (MAP AREA) SUBAREA TOTAL BEGINNING NODE ENDING NODE TYPE (Ap) MIN. MIN. in/hr in/hr TOTAL PATH, FT FT/FT FT/SEC NOTES Proposed Area P1 (Harbor)0.30 0.30 100 101 B 0.35 4.3 2.49 0.105 0.64 96 0.026 Harbor Blvd P2 (Victor)1.45 1.45 300 302 B 0.35 10 1.52 0.105 1.85 584 0.009 Victor Avenue Existing Area X1 (Harbor)0.52 0.52 100 102 B 0.1 7.5 1.79 0.030 0.83 264 0.0083 Harbor Blvd X2 (Victor)1.28 1.28 200 202 B 0.1 8.5 1.67 0.030 1.89 384 0.0081 Victor Avenue Refer to Appendix F for Mean Precipitation Intensities ("a" and "b" values). Orange County HYDROLOGY MANUAL LONGEST FLOWPATH RANGEAREA (ACRES) NOTES: I(t) = at^b a=5.702, b=-0.574 ; C = 0.90 ; Q = C*(I - Fm)*A; Fm=Ap*Fp; Fp=0.30 (Soil B, USDA Soils Map) RATIONAL METHOD STUDY FORM STUDY NAME: 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd, ANAHEIM CALCULATED BY: sp 2 YEAR STORM RATIONAL METHOD STUDY CHECKED BY: SP Page 1 of 1 1077 AND 1085 N. HARBOR BLVD AND 523 W. VICTOR AVE TR 19170 Anaheim, CA HCOC Calculations 2-Year, 24-hour storm even volume and Time of Concentration calculations were derived from the Orange County Hydrology Manual. The following equations were utilized: V2-YEAR = C(D)(A) C = Runoff Coefficient D = Mean Precipitation Depth for 24 Hours A = Area C = 0.90(ai), for Intensities (I) less than or equal to FP * ai = Ratio of Impervious areas to total area FP = Infiltration Rate for Pervious areas = 0.30 * Refer to Orange County Hydrology Manual Section C.6.4 Intensity: (OC Hydrology Manual Figure B-3) I t = a t a = 5.702 t = 1440 minutes (24 hours) b = -0.574 I t = 1440 = 5.702 1440.= . Depth: (OC Hydrology Manual Figure B-1) D t = a t a = 0.095 t = 1,440 minutes (24 hours) b = 0.426 D t = 1440 = 0.095 1,440.= . "# Existing Conditions Total Area = 1.90 ac (82,764 sf) ai = 0.94 C = 0.90(0.94) = 0.846 DMA X1 (Harbor) = 0.62 ac (27,007.2 sf) V2-YEAR-PRE = 0.846(2.104 in)( 27,007.2 sf)(1 ft/12 in) = 4,006 cf DMA X2 (Victor) = 1.28 ac (55,756.8 sf) V2-YEAR-PRE = 0.846(2.104 in)(55,756.8 sf)(1 ft/12 in) = 8,270.5 cf Proposed Conditions Total Area = 1.75 ac (76,230 sf) ai = 0.8 (Actual imperviousness will be calculated during final engineering) C = 0.9(0.8) = 0.72 DMA 1 (Harbor)= 0.30 ac (13,068 sf) V2-YEAR-POST = 0.72(2.104 in)(13,068 sf)(1 ft/12 in) = 1,650 cf DMA 2 (Victor)= 1.45 ac (63,162 sf) V2-YEAR-POST = 0.72(2.104 in)(63,162 sf)(1 ft/12 in) = 7,974 cf AREA X1 L = 264' H =2.2' Pi = 90 Tc = 7.5 min AREA P1 L = 103' H =2.35' Pi = 100 Tc = 4.25 min Harbor Blvd AREA X2 L = 384' H =3.1' Pi = 100 Tc = 8.5 min AREA P2 L = 584' H =5.38' Pi = 100 Tc = 10 min Victor Avenue PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor and 523 W. Victor Avenue ANAHEIM, CA TTM No. 19170 OTH2021-01385 DEV2021-00023 Project Address: 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave Anaheim, CA 92806 Prepared For: City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92612 Kim Prijatel, Senior Vice President of Development (949) 258-7540 Prepared By: C&V Consulting Inc. 9830 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, CA 92630 Ryan Bittner, P.E. (949) 916-3800 Prepared: August 2021 Revised: February 2022 3/2/2022, 1:14:58 PM ANAH-OTH2021-01385 Naiim Khoury TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 3.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY 2 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 2 5.0 METHODOLOGY 2 6.0 RESULTS 3 7.0 CONCLUSION 4 8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 5 9.0 REFERENCES 5 APPENDIX A: Hydrology Maps Existing Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map APPENDIX B: Hydrology Calculations Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (10-year Storm Event) Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year Storm Event) Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (100-year Storm Event) APPENDIX C: USDA Soil Map APPENDIX D: Portions of the City of Anaheim, Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area APPENDIX E: Orange County Drainage Facilities Maps APPENDIX F: Hydraulic Calculations Catch Basin Sizing Parkway Culvert Sizing 100-Yr Ponding Calculations 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 1 1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed development encompasses three (3) parcels consisting of approximately 1.91 gross acres and is located at 1075 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange. The site is bounded by W. Victor Avenue, single family homes, and a strip mall to the south, the Coral Tree Apartments and single family homes to the west, Romneya Drive, a single family home, and the Palm Motor Lounge to the north, and Harbor Blvd, La Palma Park, and a strip mall to the east. The site is currently occupied by three (3) existing buildings. Most of the site is currently paved with asphalt concrete utilized for parking and drive aisles. Concrete walkways and planters exist throughout the site as well. Along the north and west property lines and portions of the east property line there is a perimeter wall. The northwest portion of the site also consists of a narrow alley that extends north to Romenya Drive. In the proposed condition, this alley will be privately owned and maintained by the HOA and consist of landscape features. The proposed development will consist of six attached residential buildings with associated drive aisles, parking, open space recreational area, landscaping, and two entry driveways. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is currently occupied by Anaheim Clinical Trials, Angeles Hair Design, and El Naranjito Mexican Grill. The current zoning for all 3 parcels is C-G, General Commercial. This zone is defined as land used for “a variety of land uses, including some identified for the Neighborhood Center Commercial zone. Areas designated as C-G General Commercial do not necessarily serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods.” The site is not located within a specific plan area. According to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department review letter of the conceptual site plan, dated March 16, 2021 (Case No. PRE2021-00003/ DEV2021-00023), the city will not require a Zoning Reclassification but will apply the development standards for the RM-3 zone (Low Medium Density Residential). Based on site topography, the existing project site contains approximately 95% impervious coverage. In the current condition, the site generally sheet flows overland in the easterly direction towards the right-of-way on Harbor Blvd and the southerly direction towards the right-of-way on W. Victor Avenue. Runoff entering N. Harbor Blvd surface flows south on Harbor Blvd and then west in W. Victor Avenue. Runoff entering W. Victor Avenue, surface flows west to a catch basin at the end of the street and continues into the Carbon Creek Channel at La Palma Avenue. N. Harbor Blvd and W. Victor Avenue currently do not have gutters to convey runoff. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. According to the City of Anaheim, Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area, the site is located within Drainage Basin 16. Drainage Basin 8 has a tributary drainage area of approximately 407 acres consisting of 27 Drainage Areas. The project site is located within the Drainage Area 16-1 which is defined by the City of Anaheim to drain directly to Carbon Creek. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 2 The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) Drainage Facilities Maps were utilized to verify the drainage pattern of site runoff. The topographic survey was utilized to identify existing onsite high points and overall site conveyance of storm water runoff. The entire site runoff was quantified based on the longest hydraulic path from the most remote high point to drop inlet low point. Refer to Appendix E for the applicable OCFCD Drainage Facilities Maps. Refer to the “Existing Conditions Hydrology Map” located within Appendix A of this study for additional information. 3.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY The preliminary hydrology study will estimate the amount of stormwater runoff generated from the project site in the existing and proposed conditions. This study will determine whether detention or other peak flow mitigation methods will be required by comparing the proposed and existing condition peak flow rates for the 10-, 25-, and 100-year storm events. 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS The proposed development will consist of 1.75 acres and provide a total of 31 attached, multi-family residential condominiums. The 2-, 3-, and 4-bedroom units will range in square footage between 1,062 and 1,742. Associated resident and guest parking areas, a private drive aisle, recreational areas, sidewalks, and landscaped areas are also proposed within the development. Based on the proposed land use of the residential lot, the imperviousness was assumed to be 80% per the Orange County Hydrology Manual, Figure C-4. Actual imperviousness will be calculated during final engineering, and hydrology calculations will be updated. The residential site will be graded to convey stormwater as surface flow to two (2) biofiltration curb inlet treatment devices. During the design storm event, the Biofiltration systems will treat the required water quality design flow rate; runoff will be pumped into the proposed parkway culverts and surface flow into the public right of way. During larger storm events, stormwater runoff will overflow within the biofiltration system and into the public right of way via proposed parkway culverts. New concrete curb and gutter will be constructed along the project frontage on both streets to convey runoff appropriately. Treated flows will exit the biofiltration systems, enter the stormwater sump pumps, and outlet through the same parkway drains. Emergency (secondary) overflow will pond around the curb inlets and surface flow into the right-of-way over the proposed driveways. Upon entering the public storm drain, site runoff will follow the historic drainage pattern and drain to Carbon Creek Channel which confluences with Coyote Creek, and further downstream with San Gabriel River before discharging into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. Refer to “Proposed Conditions Preliminary Hydrology Map” in Appendix A within this study for additional information. 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 3 5.0 METHODOLOGY The project site was analyzed using the Orange County Hydrology Manual 1986 and released addendums. The initial subareas were analyzed for acreage, land-use, soil type, peak flow rate and time of concentration according to the Rational Method described in the manual. In this preliminary hydrology study, the recommended values per the Orange County Hydrology Manual 1986 were utilized for the percentage of impervious area of the proposed condition. Assumptions for impervious cover are shown in the Hydrology Calculations in Appendix B. 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 4 6.0 RESULTS Existing Condition Drainage Area Area (ac) Q10 (cfs) Q25 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) Tc (min) X1 0.08 0.29 0.34 0.44 5.00 X2 0.54 1.59 1.91 2.47 6.96 Total to Harbor Blvd 0.62 1.83 2.19 2.83 6.96 X3 0.06 0.22 0.26 0.33 5.00 X4 1.22 3.34 4.02 5.23 7.78 Total to Victor Ave 1.28 3.51 4.22 5.49 7.78 Proposed Condition Drainage Area Area (ac) Q10 (cfs) Q25 (cfs) Q100 (cfs) Tc (min) P1 0.08 0.28 0.34 0.44 5.0 P2 0.22 0.78 0.93 1.20 5.0 Total to Harbor Blvd 0.30 1.06 1.26 1.63 5.0 P3 0.08 0.23 0.27 0.35 7.17 P4 1.37 3.02 3.67 4.78 10.58 Total to Victor Ave 1.45 3.20 3.88 5.06 10.58 Note: All time of concentrations indicated above refer to the 100-year storm event. Catch Basin Sizing Catch basin Sizing was analyzed for the 100-year storm event peak flow. If ponding occurs at this catch basin during larger storm events. Runoff will overtop the driveway and run into N. Harbor Blvd and W. Victor Ave. Catch basin sizing and a Ponding Exhibit are provided in Appendix F of this report. 100-Year Water Surface Elevations Water surface elevations for the 100-year storm event peak flow rates will verify that the proposed finished floor elevations are set at least 1 foot above the water surface elevation. A ponding exhibit has been prepared based on the 100-year water surface elevation tributary to each subarea. Refer to Appendix H. Pipe Sizing Onsite underground storm drain pipe will be analyzed for the 100-year storm event peak flow rate utilizing WSPG software and provided during final engineering. 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 5 7.0 CONCLUSION The results from this preliminary hydrology study demonstrate that the proposed condition of the project site will discharge at lower flow rates to N. Harbor Blvd. and W. Victor Ave. than the existing condition. No infiltration will be occurring as part of the proposed development. Downstream facilities will not be hydrologically or hydraulically impacted by the proposed condition of the project site. Refer to Appendix B for Peak Runoff Calculations. Proposed habitable structures have been designed to be at least 1’ above the 100- year water surface elevation at designated sump location onsite. Proper emergency overflow has been established at the sump locations. 1077, 1085 N Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC 6 8.0 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 1. The property is located in the City of Anaheim, Orange County rainfall region. 2. 100-year storm event flood level protection analysis required for habitable structures per the requirements of the Orange County Flood Control District Design Manual. 3. Site located within Hydrologic Soil Type “B” per the USDA Web Soil Survey Data, (See Appendix D of this report for reference). The Orange County TGD indicates the project site is within Soil Type “A”. Soil Type A was used for this study. 4. Existing Conditions use the AES Land use of “Commercial” corresponding to 90% impervious cover. Proposed conditions use the AES land use of “Condominiums” corresponding to 80% impervious cover. 5. Peak flow rates and time of concentrations were calculated using Rational Method described in Orange County Hydrology Manual 1986. 6. Per FEMA Flood Map No. 06059C0131J, the project is located within Zone X, “Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood.” Refer to Appendix J for a copy of the FEMA Flood Map and additional information regarding the flood elevation. 9.0 REFERENCES 1. Orange County Hydrology Manual 1986 2. Orange County Flood Control District Design Manual 2000 3. NRCS Web Soil Survey 4. City of Anaheim, Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area 2010 5. City of Anaheim, Street and Storm Drain Improvements. Plan Number 18368 6. Orange County Drainage Facilities Map No. 13 and Carbon Creek Channel As-Built Plans 7. FEMA Firm Map Number 06059C0128J, December 3, 2009 and LOMR-F, Case No. No. 13- 09-2281A dated September 19, 2013 8. Orange County Technical Guidance Document Figure XVI-2a, NRCS Hydrologic Soils Groups APPENDIX A HYDROLOGY MAPS Existing Conditions Hydrology Map 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60STOP3535STOP Proposed Conditions Hydrology Map EV 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (10-year Storm Event) ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * EXISTING Q10 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153X10.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:55 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 10.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 49.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 155.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.060 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.08 0.30 0.100 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.29 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.29 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 155.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 153.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 215.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.313 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 0.54 0.30 0.100 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.06 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.68 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.12 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 10.76 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.13 Tc(MIN.) = 7.13 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.60 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.62 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.83 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.15 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 13.51 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.90 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.28 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 102.00 = 264.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 201.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 53.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 154.83 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.060 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.06 0.30 0.100 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.22 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.06 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.22 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 201.00 TO NODE 202.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 154.83 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 152.10 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 331.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.073 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 1.22 0.30 0.100 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.74 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.76 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.15 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 13.68 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.13 Tc(MIN.) = 8.13 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.34 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.51 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.19 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 18.15 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.07 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.40 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 202.00 = 384.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 TC(MIN.) = 8.13 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.51 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * PROPOSED Q10 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153P10.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:12 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 10.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 96.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 107.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.060 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.28 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 5.00 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.060 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 0.22 0.30 0.350 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.78 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.10 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.07 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 301.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 146.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.28 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 156.29 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.174 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.301 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 56 7.17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.23 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.23 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 301.00 TO NODE 302.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 156.29 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 151.73 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 438.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 10 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 2.588 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 1.37 0.30 0.350 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.64 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.92 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.14 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 12.65 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.79 Tc(MIN.) = 10.97 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.37 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.06 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.24 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.18 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.77 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.22 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.40 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 302.00 = 584.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 TC(MIN.) = 10.97 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.350 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.24 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (25-year Storm Event) ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * EXISTING Q25 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153X25.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:56 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 25.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 49.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 155.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.08 0.30 0.100 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.35 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 155.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 153.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 215.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.970 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 0.54 0.30 0.100 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.27 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.75 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.13 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 11.62 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.05 Tc(MIN.) = 7.05 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.91 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.62 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.20 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.16 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 14.54 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.99 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.31 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 102.00 = 264.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 201.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 53.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 154.83 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.06 0.30 0.100 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.26 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.06 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.26 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 201.00 TO NODE 202.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 154.83 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 152.10 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 331.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.704 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 1.22 0.30 0.100 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.10 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.86 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.16 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 14.71 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.97 Tc(MIN.) = 7.97 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.03 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.23 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.21 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 19.52 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.16 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.44 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 202.00 = 384.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 TC(MIN.) = 7.97 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 4.23 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * PROPOSED Q25 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153P25.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:10 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 25.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) II ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 96.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 107.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 56 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.34 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.34 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 5.00 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.824 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 0.22 0.30 0.350 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.93 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.10 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.27 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 301.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 146.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.28 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 156.29 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.174 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.932 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 56 7.17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.28 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.28 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 301.00 TO NODE 302.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 156.29 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 151.73 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 438.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 25 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 3.122 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC II): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 1.37 0.30 0.350 56 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.99 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.02 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.15 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 13.68 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.61 Tc(MIN.) = 10.78 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.37 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 3.72 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.94 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.19 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 18.15 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.32 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.44 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 302.00 = 584.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 TC(MIN.) = 10.78 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.350 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.94 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Existing & Proposed Conditions Hydrology Calculations (100-year Storm Event) ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * EXISTING Q100 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153X100.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:57 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 49.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 155.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.08 0.30 0.100 76 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.44 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.44 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 102.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 155.00 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 153.00 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 215.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.121 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 0.54 0.30 0.100 76 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.64 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.83 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.14 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 12.99 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.96 Tc(MIN.) = 6.96 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.47 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.62 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.6 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.84 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.17 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.26 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.07 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.36 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 102.00 = 264.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 201.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 53.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 155.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 154.83 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL B 0.06 0.30 0.100 76 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.33 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.06 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.33 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 201.00 TO NODE 202.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 154.83 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 152.10 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 331.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.784 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL B 1.22 0.30 0.100 76 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.73 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.95 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.17 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 16.43 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 2.83 Tc(MIN.) = 7.83 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 5.22 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.48 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.23 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 21.59 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.30 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.52 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 200.00 TO NODE 202.00 = 384.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.3 TC(MIN.) = 7.83 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.28 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.03 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.48 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1580 Analysis prepared by: ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * CVEN153 * * ANAHEIM B * * PROPOSED Q100 * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: C153P100.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 15:11 08/04/2021 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 100.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 18.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.95 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) III ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 100.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 96.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.20 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 107.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 5.000 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 76 5.00 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.44 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.44 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 101.00 TO NODE 101.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 5.00 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 6.187 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 0.22 0.30 0.350 76 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.22 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.20 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.10 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.64 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 301.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 146.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 157.28 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 156.29 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.174 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 5.031 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) CONDOMINIUMS B 0.08 0.30 0.350 76 7.17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.08 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.35 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 301.00 TO NODE 302.00 IS CODE = 91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< ============================================================================ UPSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 156.29 DOWNSTREAM NODE ELEVATION(FEET) = 151.73 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 438.00 "V" GUTTER WIDTH(FEET) = 5.00 GUTTER HIKE(FEET) = 0.050 PAVEMENT LIP(FEET) = 0.010 MANNING'S N = .0150 PAVEMENT CROSSFALL(DECIMAL NOTATION) = 0.02000 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 0.50 * 100 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 4.027 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC III): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN CONDOMINIUMS B 1.37 0.30 0.350 76 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.350 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 2.59 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.14 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.16 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 15.23 "V" GUTTER FLOW TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.41 Tc(MIN.) = 10.58 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.37 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 4.84 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.35 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.12 END OF SUBAREA "V" GUTTER HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.21 FLOOD WIDTH(FEET) = 20.04 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.49 DEPTH*VELOCITY(FT*FT/SEC) = 0.52 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 300.00 TO NODE 302.00 = 584.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.5 TC(MIN.) = 10.58 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.45 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.11 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.30 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.350 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.12 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS APPENDIX C USDA Soil Map and Orange County TGD Figure XVI-2a Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California 163—Metz loamy sand Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: hcn8 Elevation: 30 to 2,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 57 to 61 degrees F Frost-free period: 200 to 340 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Metz and similar soils:80 percent Minor components:20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Metz Setting Landform:Alluvial fans Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional):Side slope Down-slope shape:Concave Across-slope shape:Convex Parent material:Alluvium derived from mixed Typical profile H1 - 0 to 17 inches: loamy sand H2 - 17 to 63 inches: stratified sand to fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Somewhat excessively drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:5 percent Maximum salinity:Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Map Unit Description: Metz loamy sand---Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California Ecological site: R019XD035CA - SANDY (1975) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components San emigdio, fine sandy loam Percent of map unit:4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Hueneme, fine sandy loam Percent of map unit:4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Corralitos, loamy sand Percent of map unit:4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Riverwash Percent of map unit:4 percent Landform:Fans Hydric soil rating: Yes Metz, mod fine substratum Percent of map unit:4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California Survey Area Data: Version 15, Sep 13, 2021 Map Unit Description: Metz loamy sand---Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California Soil Map—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 163 Metz loamy sand 2.0 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 2.0 100.0% Soil Map—Orange County and Part of Riverside County, California ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTYRIVERS IDE COUNTY O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y S A N B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTY LOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTY ORANGE COUNTYORANGE COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYLOS ANGELES COUNTYP:\9526E\6-GIS\Mxds\Reports\InfiltrationFeasability_20110215\9526E_FigureXVI-2a_HydroSoils_20110215.mxdFIGURE XVI-2aJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 milesDESIGNEDDRAWINGCHECKEDBMP02/09/11DATEJOB NO.9526-ETHTHORANGE COUNTYINFILTRATION STUDYORANGE CO.CANRCS HYDROLOGICSOILS GROUPSSUBJECT TO FURTHER REVISION Source: Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western Riverside Date of publication: 2006-02-08 !I 03.67.21.8 Miles 05102.5 Kilometers LEGEND City Boundaries Hydrologic Soil Groups A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm PROJECT SITE APPENDIX D Portions of the City of Anaheim, Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area ".’!7"’2)""2’;’ 70#,’"$+)007) 07 ’! 0)07"*2)"0,+0,#)7 "2%)0""""""0.%, "")!%+60)06+ 67676"60.",0!0)2(+ 60)06760)067"60)06,0!0" "!’2( .&$$/ /00’"!’%,%"!!"!,000’"! !)"0"!)""+"./00’"’% !)""+"./0%,20000%,(’" "%+,000%,"&."/0 20,!"""%,%6767"6’ Table 19 – Basin 16 Summary of Hydrology Drainage Area Node Location Drainage Area (ac) 10-Year Flow (cfs) 25-Year Flow (cfs) 100-Year Flow (cfs) 16-3 1603 Victor St. at Village St. 14 30 35 40 16-3 1604 Village St at Carbon Creek 32 50 60 80 16-4 1633 La Palma Park at Harbor Blvd. 23 40 50 65 16-4 1635 Harbor Blvd. at Carbon Creek 40 60 70 95 16-6 1609 Mayfair St. at Carbon Creek 19 25 30 40 16-20 16203 Sycamore St. at Olive St. 12 13 16 20 16-20 16204 Wilhelmina St. at Olive St. 26 25 30 40 16-20 16206 Olive St. at Carbon Creek 50 45 55 75 16-21 16214 Wilhelmina St. at Zeyn St. 29 35 45 60 16-21 16215 North St. at Zeyn St. 68 85 105 140 16-21 16216 Zeyn St. at Carbon Creek 75 85 105 145 16-22 16233 Wilhelmina St. at Harbor Blvd. 34 40 50 65 16-22 16234 North St. at Harbor Blvd. 64 70 85 115 16-22 16235 Harbor Blvd. at Carbon Creek 102 100 130 175 16-23 16242 Northgate St. at Citron St. 28 30 40 50 16-23 16243 Citron St. at Carbon Creek 31 30 40 55 /$)#"$ ,!’"0)0%)."’ +670"2%0%$+)*2)" "%,)02(/0"A%6!06!0; /0’!!’.)%!%7,0!0>)!%6’ /0.0’")!!!)%!)""+". +670"2 ’! "5 /0"%, 05 ,0)2(/0"A%6 !06!0;7"!!’.)%!%7,0!0>)6’ +670"2+2 "+0)"/0" %,0+0)"),<0")0D’ ,0)2(/0"A%6!06!0;7 "!!’.)%!%7,0!0>)6’ +670"2 ’! "*2)"/0" %,0*2)",0)2(/0"A %6!06!0;7"!!’.)%!%7,0!0>) !%6’ %$"$&#"$ "%’0’8>)%!’06’0 "7"%’0%"","0!70%, !""%+6767676"6/%’0’8%"" ,"0!+67%%6!0;!""C /%’0’8%"","0!+67.%0. "!%%%6!0;"*2)""" %%6!0;" /%’0’8%"","0!+67%%6!0; "?0 +67%%6!0"6!0 "" /%’0’8%"","0!+67,"!% %%6!0;" /0"% 0,#)700’")!!!)!)""+".-"0 %,!!)+".# !$ /0"!)A"/2!)"!%!)!77 "7)’7"!)!!%%" 02!"!)".!7072""72!(%7!!7 %.!7"!0)%!/0""!% !)""+".+ !0!)!%0!""%!,2"))2% ’70!%,2)29!%))!)!! !/0%7!""00%)"20"% %01% (%0!" !%"%"!)!%%!0)"2"%!!%!’8 !0! )A"/20!)!! 2’9!!%+67676767"+6 Table 20 – Basin 16 Cost Estimate Area Storm Drain ID Street Type of Facility Length (feet) Estimated Cost (2010 Dollars) Area Total 16-1 SD 16-1_01 (P) Village St. New 36-inch RCP 815 $ 867,000 $ 867,000 16-4 SD 16-4_01 (P) Harbor Blvd. Parallel 36-inch RCP 400 $ 408,000 $1,190,000 16-4 SD 16-4_02 (P) Harbor Blvd. New 42-inch RCP 625 $ 782,000 16-21 SD 16-21_01 (P) North St. Parallel 30-inch RCP 355 $ 306,000 $ 306,000 16-22 SD 16-22_01 (P) Harbor Blvd. Parallel 30-inch/42- inch RCP 2,410 $2,735,000 $2,735,000 16-23 SD 16-23_01 (P) Citron St. New 36-inch RCP 525 $ 575,000 $ 575,000 TOTAL FOR BASIN 16 $5,673,000 $5,673,000 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) )) ) )) )) )) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) )) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) )) )) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ) ) )) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ))) )) ) ) ))) ) ) ) )))))) ))) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) ) ) ) )) )) ) ) ) ) ) ))) ) ) )) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) )) ) ) )) ) )))) ))) )) ))))))) ) ) ) ) !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(SD_16-4_01 (P)CITRON STVILLAGE STHARBOR BLVDCarbon Creek (B01)36"30"42"36"3 0 "42"36"SD_16-22_01 (P)SD_16-1_01 (P)SD_16-4_02 (P)SD_16-23_01 (P)) S D_16-21_0 1 (P) ) 16-22 16-21 16-23 16-20 16-1 16-416-6 16-3 16-16 16-25 16-18 16-2 16-1016-5 16-26 16-11 16-12 16-24 16-1416-1516-19 16-17 16-13 16-27 91 OLIVE STCITRON STW I L HE L M I NA S T C Y PR ES S S TZEYN STA D E L E S TLEMON STPAULINE STPINE STSABINA STJANSS STN O R T H S TPATT STCLAUDINA STDICKEL STHELENA STLENZ DRPHILADELPHIA STROBIN STCLEMENTINE STC E N T E R S TRESH STMAVIS STDWYER DRPIN E W A Y CANARY ST COMMERCIAL ST PARK AVE RIVIERA STORANGEFAIR MALL KEMP STJ A N S S WA Y SWAN STEMILY STPI O N EE R D R BALSAM AVE C IT R O N L N B LU EJ A Y LN C I T Y C TCHARTRES S TRAVENNA STOHIO STA L B E R T A S T K E N W A YWREN STSUMMER STPOMONA AVERALSTON STCARLETON AVEJ A D E W A Y AF T O N L N ROWAN ST JULIANNA AVE HALL AVE WESTWOOD PLL E O N O R A S TPIN E PLMALBORO AVE A L B E R T A S TLEMON STJULIANNA AVE PAULINE STRESH ST91 HELENA ST91 COMMERCIAL ST 91 9 1 JANSS STCLAUDINA ST91 PINE STSABINA STSABINA STPATT ST91 C E N T E R S THARBOR BLVDN O R T H S T S Y C A M O R E S T OLIVE STANAHEIM BLVDWEST STROMNEYA DR LEMON STN OR T H ST RAYMOND BASIN54 9 0 9 3 66 6078393642 6 4 5 27 1 8 577 .2 5 ' X 1 6 '30487' X 12'331 2 24 1 57.0' X 12.0'216 '3 " X 3 '3 " 27 4 2 3 6 1 23666 361 2 2 4 39 333 6 54 18 663 0 5733243027 183342 24 481 8 1830 2 4 Figure 13 Drainage Basin 16 Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area± 1 inch equals 1,000 feet \\CHERON\Projects\AnaheimCaCityOf\381357\GIS\Maps January 22, 2010 SD 1-1_01 (P) Proposed Pipeline ID Drainage Area_Line No. (Proposed) Note: Priority 2 proposed improvements will parallel existing storm drains unless otherwise noted APPENDIX E Orange County Drainage Facilities Maps PROJECT SITE PROJECT SITE APPENDIX F Hydraulic Calculations Catch Basin Sizing Inlet Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Aug 4 2021 Curb Inlet #1 Curb Inlet Location = Sag Curb Length (ft) = 4.00 Throat Height (in) = 6.00 Grate Area (sqft) = -0- Grate Width (ft) = -0- Grate Length (ft) = -0- Gutter Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.076 Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.083 Local Depr (in) = 2.00 Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00 Gutter Slope (%) = -0- Gutter n-value = -0- Calculations Compute by:Known Q Q (cfs)= 0.44 Highlighted Q Total (cfs)= 0.44 Q Capt (cfs)= 0.44 Q Bypass (cfs) = -0- Depth at Inlet (in) = 3.03 Efficiency (%)= 100 Gutter Spread (ft) = 1.13 Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0- Bypass Spread (ft) = -0- Bypass Depth (in) = -0- Inlet Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Wednesday, Aug 4 2021 Curb Inlet #2 Curb Inlet Location = Sag Curb Length (ft) = 4.00 Throat Height (in) = 6.00 Grate Area (sqft) = -0- Grate Width (ft) = -0- Grate Length (ft) = -0- Gutter Slope, Sw (ft/ft) = 0.076 Slope, Sx (ft/ft) = 0.083 Local Depr (in) = 2.00 Gutter Width (ft) = 2.00 Gutter Slope (%) = -0- Gutter n-value = -0- Calculations Compute by:Known Q Q (cfs)= 4.84 Highlighted Q Total (cfs)= 4.84 Q Capt (cfs)= 4.84 Q Bypass (cfs) = -0- Depth at Inlet (in) = 7.10 Efficiency (%)= 100 Gutter Spread (ft) = 5.28 Gutter Vel (ft/s) = -0- Bypass Spread (ft) = -0- Bypass Depth (in) = -0- Parkway Drain Sizing Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, Aug 5 2021 Q100 Parkway Culvert #1 Rectangular Bottom Width (ft) = 1.00 Total Depth (ft) = 0.33 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 2.00 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 0.44 Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.13 Q (cfs)= 0.440 Area (sqft)= 0.13 Velocity (ft/s)= 3.38 Wetted Perim (ft) = 1.26 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.19 Top Width (ft)= 1.00 EGL (ft)= 0.31 0 .25 .5 .75 1 1.25 1.5 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Reach (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, Aug 5 2021 Q100 Parkway Culvert #2 Rectangular Bottom Width (ft) = 3.00 Total Depth (ft) = 0.33 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Slope (%)= 2.00 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 4.84 Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.27 Q (cfs)= 4.840 Area (sqft)= 0.81 Velocity (ft/s)= 5.98 Wetted Perim (ft) = 3.54 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.33 Top Width (ft)= 3.00 EGL (ft)= 0.83 0 .5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 99.75 -0.25 100.00 0.00 100.25 0.25 100.50 0.50 100.75 0.75 101.00 1.00 Reach (ft) 100-Year Ponding Calculations Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, Aug 5 2021 Q100_CB #! Depth of Flow User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 155.06 Slope (%)= 0.80 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 0.44 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( 0.00, 156.19)-(10.99, 155.64, 0.013)-(14.99, 155.56, 0.013)-(15.09, 155.06, 0.013)-(16.49, 155.09, 0.013)-(26.99, 155.30, 0.013)-(38.98, 155.54, 0.013) -(38.99, 156.04, 0.013)-(61.06, 156.48, 0.013)-(62.00, 156.50, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.12 Q (cfs)= 0.440 Area (sqft)= 0.35 Velocity (ft/s)= 1.25 Wetted Perim (ft) = 6.02 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.12 Top Width (ft)= 5.92 EGL (ft)= 0.14 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 154.50 -0.56 155.00 -0.06 155.50 0.44 156.00 0.94 156.50 1.44 157.00 1.94 Sta (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc.Thursday, Aug 5 2021 Q100_CB #2 Depth of Flow User-defined Invert Elev (ft) = 151.90 Slope (%)= 0.80 N-Value = 0.013 Calculations Compute by:Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 4.84 (Sta, El, n)-(Sta, El, n)... ( 0.00, 153.03)-(11.00, 152.48, 0.013)-(15.00, 152.40, 0.013)-(15.05, 151.90, 0.013)-(16.50, 151.92, 0.013)-(27.00, 152.10, 0.013)-(38.92, 152.30, 0.013) -(39.00, 152.80, 0.013)-(44.05, 152.92, 0.013) Highlighted Depth (ft)= 0.25 Q (cfs)= 4.840 Area (sqft)= 1.90 Velocity (ft/s)= 2.55 Wetted Perim (ft) = 15.18 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.28 Top Width (ft)= 14.95 EGL (ft)= 0.35 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Elev (ft)Depth (ft)Section 151.00 -0.90 151.50 -0.40 152.00 0.10 152.50 0.60 153.00 1.10 153.50 1.60 154.00 2.10 Sta (ft) EV 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 00011 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: Keith Linker From: Mike Swan Date: March 10, 2022 Subject: Sewer Study – 1075 N. Harbor Blvd. City Project Tracking No.: TECH2022-01415 The purpose of this memorandum is to document a sewer study prepared for the proposed residential development consisting of 31 dwelling units (du). The site consists of Assessor Parcel Nos. (APN) 271-071-07, -08, -10, with an area of approximately 1.88 acres. The project would include the demolition of the existing three commercial buildings on the site, consisting of 15,510 square feet (sf) of building area. The site is bounded on the north by Romneya Drive and on the east by Harbor Boulevard, on the west by existing apartment buildings and on the south by Victor Avenue as shown on Figure 1. According to the Central Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (CAMPSS), dated December 2017, sewer generation from the site and adjacent parcels to the north and south in the Buildout System computer model scenario were loaded as commercial use based on acreage to the existing 6-inch sewer in Victor Avenue and 24-inch sewer in Romneya Drive to the south and north, respectively. Sewage from the project site is proposed to discharge at manholes SW060406 on Victor Avenue. The existing three buildings on the project site plus the buildout increase of 1,418 gallons per day (gpd) for the project site of 1.88 acres will be removed from manhole SW060406 in Victor Ave and manhole SW060221 in Romneya Drive. Sewage from the proposed 31 DUs will add an average load of 7,750 gpd, to manhole SW060406. The existing and proposed manhole loading with flow generation is summarized in Table 1. Flow factors are in gallons per day (gpd)/acre and gpd/du The existing downstream sewer collection system and the location of the proposed project site are shown on Figure 2. The proposed flow factor for the residential development units is 250 gpd/du based on the CAMPSS. As shown in Table 1, the proposed project would result in a total flow decrease from the existing commercial site of 1,418 gpd. The proposed flow increase for the project to Victor Avenue is 7,750 gpd (31x250) minus 378 gpd, for a total net average daily flow increase to the La Palma sewer collection system of 7,372 gpd. There would also be a net decrease in flow to the Romneya system of 1,040 gpd (average). 1075 N. Harbor Blvd. Sewer Study Page 2 of 3 March 10, 2022 2ANA015042 2 Table 1 – Existing and Proposed Manhole Flow Loading Red fonts indicate removals or decreases in flow The Buildout Condition Scenario plus the peak project flow over a 24-hour simulation period and the maximum depth-to-Diameter (d/D) ratios for the sewer collection system from the latest hydraulic model are shown in Table 2. The sewer system manholes are shown in detail in the immediate vicinity of the project on Figure 1 with manhole numbers corresponding to the Upstream and Downstream IDs in Table 2. The entire downstream sewer collection system is shown graphically on Figure 2 with manhole numbers at key locations shown. Flow from the project runs southerly in Harbor Boulevard and westerly in La Palma Avenue. There are two parallel sewers in La Palma Avenue west of Harbor Boulevard. The project flow is proposed to discharge into a 6-inch line on Victor Avenue which then turns south along Harbor Boulevard and upsizes to 8-, 10-, and 12-inch reaches before connecting to the 21-inch southerly line on La Palma Avenue and continues to flow westerly. Downstream of Harbor Boulevard, the southerly La Palma line is 21-inch in diameter increasing to 24-inch between Lido and Laguna Streets. It continues westerly, eventually discharging to the Orange County Sanitation District trunk sewer system in Euclid Street. As shown on Table 2, Buildout Scenario, the proposed condition shows no deficiencies with a maximum d/D ratio of 0.57 in the 6-inch line on Victor Avenue. This is a borderline capacity concern since it is over the d/D criteria of 0.50 for new construction but below the criteria of 0.67 1075 N. Harbor Blvd. Sewer Study Page 3 of 3 March 10, 2022 2ANA015042 3 for replacement. However, the City should require the developer to replace the 272-foot segment of 6-inch sewer in Victor Avenue from SW060406 to SW060410, consistent with the policy to replace all 6-inch sewers over time. The Buildout Condition Scenario plus the project flows and d/D ratios for the sewer collection system from the hydraulic model are shown in Table 2. As seen in Table 2, there are no deficiencies present in the downstream collection system from the proposed project. Model output was not printed out as the flows actually decreased slightly but the hydraulic model has been updated to reflect this reduction. Conclusion Sewer system improvements are not required for the proposed residential development on Harbor Boulevard and Victor Avenue consisting of 31 du. The model results show sufficient capacity within the existing sewer collection pipelines for the minor increased sewer flow generated by the proposed project for buildout demand. However, since the project is connecting to and increasing flow beyond a d/D ratio of 0.50 for a 6-inch sewer, that segment should be upgraded to an 8-inch fronting the property and downstream to the next manhole. Attachments: Figures 1 & 2, Table 2 Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Figure 1Location Map/SW071101SW060406SW060410 HARBOR BLVDPROJECT SITE APN: 271-071-07 271-071-08 271-071-10 24" 6" 21" LA PALMA AVE SW0602218" 10"SW061105 ROMNEYA DR VICTOR AVE 12" JULIANNA AVE Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Figure 2Tributary Basin Map/ ROMNEYA DR LA PALMA AVE PROJECT SITE 6" 8" 10" 21"HARBOR BLVDCITRON STWEST STEUCLID ST24"24"SW071101SW060406SW060410SW060221SW052205ARBOR STSW05212824" 21" Table 2 - Buildout Land Use Scenario Plus Project Street Cross Street Upstrm MH-Dwnstrm MH Size (in) Length (ft) Slope (ft/ft) Peak Flow (gpm) d/D Victor Ave SW060406-SW060410 6 318.99 0.0010 31.44 0.57 Victor Ave SW060410-SW060417 8 271.73 0.0020 35.38 0.30 Julianna Ave SW060417-SW060418 10 93.70 0.0010 49.84 0.29 SW060418-SW070314 10 409.21 0.0020 51.64 0.26 La Palma Ave SW070314-SW071101 12 84.96 0.0440 54.04 0.09 Harbor Blvd SW071101-SW061203 21 347.64 0.0030 1747.99 0.50 SW061203-SW061202 21 386.15 0.0030 1749.45 0.50 Lemon St SW061202-SW060430 21 431.70 0.0030 1749.45 0.50 SW060430-SW061201 21 199.95 0.0030 1892.71 0.52 Citron St SW061201-SW061106 21 105.36 0.0030 1894.21 0.52 SW061106-SW061105 21 135.47 0.0030 1985.00 0.54 SW061105-SW061104 21 177.36 0.0030 1992.27 0.54 Mayfair Ave SW061104-SW061103 21 272.14 0.0030 2069.97 0.55 Leisure Ct SW061103-SW061102 21 337.49 0.0030 2070.53 0.55 SW061102-SW061101 21 115.70 0.0040 2070.84 0.50 West St SW061101-SW052207 21 275.00 0.0020 2139.18 0.66 Lomita St SW052207-SW052206 21 149.58 0.0020 2139.13 0.65 SW052206-SW052205 21 260.42 0.0020 2139.13 0.68 SW052205-SW052204 24 58.79 0.0060 2155.38 0.39 SW052204-SW052203 24 345.38 0.0020 2155.34 0.51 Hermosa Dr SW052203-SW052202 24 122.25 0.0020 2155.31 0.51 SW052202-SW052201 24 130.49 0.0020 2155.27 0.54 Loara St SW052201-SW052103 24 337.26 0.0010 2235.71 0.64 SW052103-SW052102 24 381.89 0.0010 2318.98 0.73 Dresden St SW052102-SW052105 24 259.22 0.0010 2318.91 0.63 SW052105-SW052104 24 262.57 0.0020 2320.09 0.55 Euclid St SW052104-SW052128 24 82.51 0.0100 2320.03 0.35 Harbor Blvd L A P A L M A A V E Page 1 of 1 Project Description Proposed Residential at 1075-1085 N. Harbor & 523 W. Victor The proposed residential project includes 31 single family attached homes on 1.75 acres (17.7 du/acre). All homes are proposed to be for-sale at market rate. The requested entitlements for the project include a Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit for one modified development standard. The attached townhome units will have attached two-car garages with a mix of tandem and side-by-side configurations, as well as private decks and patios (private open space). The homes range in size from 1,002 square feet to 1,814 square feet with 2-4 bedrooms and 2.5-4 bathrooms. The units will be served by private drive aisles accessed from two entries on Harbor and Victor. The private drive aisles as well as all common open space, private utilities serving the project, and building exteriors (including roofs) will be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association. In addition to the 62 garage parking spaces, there will be 31 guest parking spaces onsite including two ADA. To ensure the garage parking spaces remain open for the use of residential parking, all owners will be required to sign a disclosure (or CC&Rs) that specifies that only the parking of vehicles will be permitted in the designated parking areas and garages. In no instance shall items be stored in garages so as to impede the parking of two vehicles. Furthermore, the tandem spaces will be in a private, attached garage assigned to the same unit. The HOA management will be responsible for enforcement for quarterly inspections to ensure that no personal items are being stored in the garage parking spaces. The project site currently contains a commercial center with tenants including a pharmaceutical testing facility, Mexican restaurant, and hair salon totaling 13,480 square feet. The site is surrounded by a commercial center to the southeast (tenants include another restaurant, hair salon laundry facility), Palm Motor Lodge motel to the north and multi-family residential to the west. ATTACHMENT 4 ATTACHMENT 5 2021022 | 03-17-22 City Ventures Contact: Kim Prijatel 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612 949.258.7540 | www.CityVentures.com WHA. Architects . Planners . Designers . Contact: Nick Manea 680 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.250.0607 | www.WHAinc.com First City Submittal Second City Submittal Third City Submittal Planning Commission Submittal Submittal Log File No.: 08/03/2021 10/29/2021 12/14/2021 03/17/2022 ARCHITECTURE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN .................................................SP-1 CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN .....................................SP-2 SITE PLAN WINDOW ANALYSIS ........................................SP-3 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-1 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-2 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-3 BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-4 BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-5 BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-6 TRASH ENCLOSURE|Conceptual Floor Plan & Elevations ....A-7 SHEET LIST: CIVIL Title Sheet .......................................................................C-1 Preliminary Site Plan ........................................................C-2 Preliminary Grading Plan ..................................................C-3 Sections ..........................................................................C-4 Preliminary Utility Plan .....................................................C-5 Preliminary Fire Access & Hydrant Location Plan ...............C-6 LANDSCAPE Existing Landscape Condition ...........................................L-1 Conceptual Landscape Plan ..............................................L-2 Transformer Landscape Screening Exhibit ..........................L-3 Design Imagery ................................................................L-4 Conceptual Irrigation Master Plan ......................................L-5 Conceptual Wall and Fence Plan ........................................L-6 Conceptual Master Plant Palette ........................................L-7 Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. ANAHEIM 2 Anaheim, CA C2 Collaborative Contact: Niki Wu 100 Avenida Miramar, San Clemente, CA 92672 949.366.6624 | www.c2collaborative.com C&V Consulting Contact: Sarah Pfeifer 9830 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 949.916.3800 | www.cvc-inc.net ATTACHMENT 6 SP-1ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SP-2ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN SP-3ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 SITE PLAN WINDOW ANALYSIS WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Stairway 4. Stairway 5. Bath 1 6. Bath 2 7. Stairway 8. Walk In Closet *All windows at least 22' from property line WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Stairway 4. Stairway 5. Bath 1 6. Bath 2 7. Stairway 8. Walk In Closet *All windows at least 22' from property line BUILDING 200 BUILDING 200 WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Den 2. Den 3. Living 4. Dining 5. Kitchen 6. Bath 2 7. Master Bath 8. Master Bedroom *Windows 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 are setback 20' WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Den 2. Den 3. Living 4. Dining 5. Kitchen 6. Bath 2 7. Master Bath 8. Master Bedroom *Windows 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 are setback 20' BUILDING 400 BUILDING 400 1 1 2 2 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 3 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 A-1ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Floor Plans Occupancy: R3 Consturction: VB Sprinkler System: 13D FX2050 FX5050 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR30SC80UP17RHYBRIDW/HFXTEMP. GL.462028SC6816'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR 30SC80UP 17R HYBRID W/H FX TEMP. GL. 46 2028SC68 TEMP. GL. SLIDER8050 FX2050 FX5050TEMP. GL. SLIDER80502-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 13'-7"13'-2"x LIVING ENTRY 9'-3"8'-1"x DINING CTS BATH 2 PDR S KITCHEN P 11'-0"10'-7"x BEDROOM 2 10'-10"13'-2"x MASTER BEDROOM M. BATH WIC WIC LIN. Plan 1 2 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,002 SF 2'-9"10'-10"x DECK WH SL. 0.25:12 SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12D.S.SL.0.5:12D.S.D.S.SL.0.5:12SL. 0.25:12SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 | 2021022 | 07-29-21C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 100 NOTE: 1.SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2.FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. First Floor Second FloorThird Floor Roof STORAGE AREA 1'-0" X 5'-0" X 5'-0" (26 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 4'-11" X 5'-2" X 3'-0" (76 CU. FT.) A-2ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Elevations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding, Stone Veneer Exterior Accents: Metal Awning, Decorative Light Fixture Deck Accents: Metal Railings Window & Door Trim: Fiber Cement Trim Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors Right Rear FrontLeft Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. A-3ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans Occupancy: R2 Consturction: VB Sprinkler System: Full 13 CHS VC C HS 17R DN 2468###########266824 68 24 6821068 VC VC246824 68 28682468+24" SHELF VC 26 68 OPTIONAL6050SL TEMP. GL.2040SHDN 17R EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*EVSEELEC CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELECEVSE UP 17R(U.N.O.)*C HS CHSCHSUP 17R DN 18R 246826682468 24 68 VC 60 50 SL C HS CHSUP 17R DN 17R 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR TANDEM 10'-0" x 40'-0" CLR. ENTRY CTS 12'-0"10'-3"x BEDROOM 4 ENTRYENTRY BATH 3 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 3 16'-6"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 6'-0"15'-3"x DECK 5'-7"15'-5"x DECK 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC 16'-6"13'-9"x LIVING 11'-7"9'-0"x DINING KITCHEN 10'-2"7'-2"x DECK PDR S 12'-0"12'-6"x MASTER BEDROOM 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 10'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC LIN. BATH 2 M.BATH 11'-1"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM M.BATH WIC WIC LIN. S WIC 12'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 13'-6"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM WIC WIC M.BATH WIC W D 11'-6"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 Plan 2 3 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba / Opt. Loft 2 Car Garage +/-1,335 SFPlan 3 3 Bdrm / 3 Ba 2 Car Tandem +/-1,312 SF Plan 4 4 Bdrm / 4 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,573 SF WH WH WH SL. 0.25:12 SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12D.S. D.S.SL.0.5:12SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12D.S.| 2021022 | 07-29-21C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 200 NOTE: 1.SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2.FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. First Floor Second FloorThird Floor Roof STORAGE AREA 4'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (128.6 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 6'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (181.9 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 3'-11" X 4'-4" X 8'-0" (135.8 CU. FT.) A-4ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding, Stone Veneer Exterior Accents: Metal Awning, Decorative Light Fixture Deck Accents: Metal Railings Window & Door Trim: Fiber Cement Trim Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Elevations Right Rear Front Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary.Left A-5ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans Occupancy: R2 Consturction: VB Sprinkler System: Full 13 CHS VC C HS 17R DN 2468VC VC VC DN 17R VC VC VC DN 17R EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*EVSEELEC CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELECEVSE UP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELECEVSE UP 17R(U.N.O.)*FX6020 C HS CHSCHSUP 17R DN 18R VC C HS CHSUP 17R DN 17R VC C HS CHSUP 17R DN 17R 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR TANDEM 10'-0" x 40'-0" CLR. 16'-6"13'-9"x LIVING 11'-7"9'-0"x DINING KITCHEN 10'-2"7'-2"x DECK 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 3 16'-6"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 6'-0"14'-11"x DECK 5'-1"15'-5"x DECK 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC 11'-1"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM M.BATH WIC WIC LIN. S WIC 12'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 13'-6"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM WIC WIC M.BATH WIC W D 11'-6"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 12'-0"10'-3"x BEDROOM 4 ENTRYENTRY BATH 4 ENTRY CTS 12'-0"12'-6"x MASTER BEDROOM 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 10'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC LIN. BATH 2 M.BATH Plan 3 3 Bdrm / 3 Ba 2 Car Tandem +/-1,312 SF Plan 4 4 Bdrm / 4 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,573 SF BATH 3 BATH 3 WH WH WH Plan 2 3 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba / Opt. Loft 2 Car Garage +/-1,335 SF SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12D.S. D.S.D.S.| 2021022 | 07-29-21C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 300 NOTE: 1.SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2.FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. First Floor Second FloorThird Floor Roof STORAGE AREA 4'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (128.6 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 6'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (181.9 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 3'-11" X 4'-4" X 8'-0" (135.8 CU. FT.) A-6ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Floor Plans VC DN 17R CHS VC C HS 17R DN CHS VC C HS 17R DNVC VC VC DN 17R VC VC VC DN 17R EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELECEVSE UP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELECEVSE UP 17R(U.N.O.)*ELEC EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*CHSEVSEELEC CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*44"X60" CLEAR 36"X48" CLEAR 42"X54" CLEAR 54"X60" CLEAR 42"X48" CLEAR 30"X48" CLEAR 54"X48" CLEAR EVSEELEC CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*44"X60" CLEAR 36"X48" CLEAR 42"X54" CLEAR 54"X60" CLEAR 42"X48" CLEAR 30"X48" CLEAR 54"X48" CLEAR EVSEUP 17R(U.N.O.)*UP 17R DN 18R C HS CHSCHSUP 17R DN 18R VC C HS CHSUP 17R DN 17R C HS CHSCHSUP 17R DN 18R VC C HS CHSUP 17R DN 17R Plan 5 4 Bdrm / 3 Ba / Den 2 Car Garage +/-1,814 SF Plan 3 3 Bdrm / 3 Ba 2 Car Tandem +/-1,312 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. ENTRY CTS ENTRY 2-CAR TANDEM 10'-0" x 40'-0" CLR. 16'-6"13'-9"x LIVING 11'-7"9'-0"x DINING KITCHEN 10'-2"7'-2"x DECK PDR S 12'-11"10'-3"x DEN ENTRY 5'-3"15'-3"x DECK 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 3 16'-6"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM KITCHEN CTS 5'-1"15'-5"x DECK 12'-0"12'-6"x MASTER BEDROOM 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 10'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 WIC LIN. BATH 2 M.BATH 11'-4"12'-8"x BEDROOM 4 11'-8"15'-5"x LIVING 10'-10"12'-4"x DINING KITCHEN CTS LIN. BATH 310'-4"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 10'-4"10'-2"x BEDROOM 3 13'-3"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM WIC WIC BATH 2 M.BATH LIN. LIN. WD SERV. 16'-7"11'-8"x DEN ENTRY PDR BATH 3 12'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 11'-1"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM M.BATH 11'-6"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 WIC WIC SERV. D W WIC WIC 11'-6"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM LIN.LIN. WIC WIC 5'-3"15'-3"x DECK BATH 3 6'-0"15'-3"x DECK P. M.BATH S Plan 4 (Adaptable) 3 Bdrm / 3.5 Ba / Den 2 Car Garage +/-1,573 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. WHWH WH Plan 2 3 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba / Opt. Loft 2 Car Garage +/-1,335 SF SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12D.S.D.S.D.S. D.S.SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 | 2021022 | 07-29-21C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 400 NOTE: 1.SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2.FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. First Floor Second FloorThird Floor Roof Occupancy: R2 Consturction: VB Sprinkler System: Full 13 (Configuration at Building 1 Shown) STORAGE AREA 4'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (128.6 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 4'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (128.6 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 6'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (181.9 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 3'-11" X 4'-4" X 8'-0" (135.8 CU. FT.) A-7ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 BUILDING 400 | Conceptual Elevations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding, Stone Veneer Exterior Accents: Metal Awning, Decorative Light Fixture Deck Accents: Metal Railings Window & Door Trim: Fiber Cement Trim Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations Right Rear Front Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary.Left A-8ANAHEIM 2 ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2021022 | 03-17-22 0 2 4 8 TRASH ENCLOSURE | Conceptual Floor Plan & Elevations Rear ElevationLeft Elevation Right Elevation Roof Plan Front Elevation Floor Plan N. HARBOR BLVD W. VICTOR AVEW. ROMNEYA DR.03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-1 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITION To be removed To be removed Phoenix roebelenii Washingtonia robusta Dwarf Date Palm Mexican Fan Palm 1-4 Multi Trunks 40’ - 50’ BTH SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT EXISTING TREE SCHEDULE: Scale: N.T.S. W. ROMNEYA DR.**The proposed landscape frontage improvements along Harbor Blvd within the Ultimate Right of Way will be temporary improvements and shall be maintained by the Developer/ HOA. These improvements will remain in place until the city accepts the irrevocable offer of dedication.” 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-2 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 2 2 1 12 7 7 10 11 11 1 1 9 9 10 8 3 LEGEND Concrete Sidewalk Accent Node Paving Front Patio with Patio Fence and Gate Harbor Frontage • Canopy Tree Array • Passive Walkway • 36” Screening Fence Social Space • Overhead Structure • Open Lawn Area • Seating Walls Dog Park • Fence/Gate • Bark Mulch • Canopy Tree Array • Benches Screening Trees Mailboxes Trash Enclosure Transformer The end of parking stall planters should have minimum 3’ high shrubs and groundcover. Street Trees (20’ o.c. max) 5 4 9 10 11 12 4 8 3 6 5 7 6 2 1 0 10’20’40’ Scale: 1”= 20’-0” ADA Path of Travel (refer to Civil for directional slope % and ramp details) N. HARBOR BLVD W. VICTOR AVE12 KEYMAP 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-3 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -TRANSFORMER LANDSCAPE SCREENING EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN VIEW 1 PEDESTRIAN VIEW 2 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-4 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -DESIGN IMAGERY MATERIAL PLANTING GREEN SPACE LIFESTYLE N. HARBOR BLVD W. VICTOR AVEW. ROMNEYA DR.03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-5 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION MASTER PLAN Hydrozone:Eto:KL LA Sq. Ft.Conversion SLA Sq. Ft.MAWA Landscaped Area 49.7 0.55 18,965 0.62 NA 321,413 MAWA= Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) 0.50= Evapotraspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) 1.0= ETAF for Sprcial Landscaped Area LA= Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) 0.3= the additional ET adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area (1.0- 0.7= 0.3) SLA= Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Applicant to fill in boxes below: Eto (Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C inches per year) Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Hydrozone:Eto:KL Sq. Ft.Conversion IE EAWU Low Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.2 8,541 0.62 0.80 65,796 Medium Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.5 9,355 0.62 0.85 169,568 High Water Use (Rotor)49.7 0.8 1,069 0.62 0.70 37,646 High (Water Feature)49.7 1.0 - 0.62 1.00 - Total EAWU:18,965 273,009 EAWU= Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) KI= Landscape Coefficient LA= Landscaped Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) IE= Irrigation Efficiency= IME X DU (See definication in Appendix E for exmaplne IE percentages) IME= Irrigation Management Efficiency (90%) DU= Distribution Uniformity of Irrigation Head KI= Ks x Kc x Kmc Ks= species factor (range 1.0- 0.9) (see WUCOLS list for values) Kd= density factor (range 0.5- 1.3) (see WUCOLS list for density value) Kmc= microclimatic factor (range 0.5- 1.4) (see WUCOLS) Table A- PF (Plant Factor) Cool Season Turf= 0.8 Warm Season Turf= 0.7 High Water Use Plants= 0.7 (can be between 0.7-0.9) Moderate Water Use Plants= 0.5 (can be between 0.4-0.6) Low Water Use Plants= 0.3 (can be between 0.1-0.3) Very Low Water Use Plants= 0.1 IE (Irrigation Efficiency)- Appendix E Pop-up Stream Rotor= 0.75 Rotor Head= 0.75 Microspray= 0.75 Bubblers= 0.8 Drip Emitters= 0.85 Subsurface Irrigation= 0.9 Project Name: 1077 and 1085 N. Harbor Blvd and 523 W. Victor Ave, Anaheim, CA WATER EFFICIENT WORK SHEET Total EAWU = (Eto x KL x LA in Sq.ft. / IE)= Gallons per Year 49.7 18,965 0 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) Estimated Annual Water Use: Total MAWA = (Eto x 0.50 x LA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)+(Eto x 1.0 x SLA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)= Gallons per year for LA + SLA Date: November 9, 2021 Irrigation Note: 1. All planting areas shall have a fully automatic irrigation system. Utilization water conserving features such as low-precipitation rate heads; low-flow micro sprays or drip irrigation, water sensors and multi-program controllers with weather station capability and drip circuit features. “Water Efficient Landscapes” irrigation system, scheduling and water use WELO calculations shall be designed to meet the requirements of the specifications of the City of Anaheim. 2. Irrigation shown are diagrammatic. Irrigation mainline and lateral shall be installed in shrub beds where allows- lateral piping shall be installed 12” min. below grade and mainline 18” min. below grade, and provide sleeves under all hardscape areas. All irrigation valve boxes shall be located in planting areas- setback from front edge of each valve box to be a minimum of 1’ from the edge of paving or turf areas. 3. All utility infrastructure and other potential conflicts including off site and below-grade that could affect irrigation design considered. IRRIGATION LEGEND High Water Use Medium Water Use Low Water Use 0 10’20’40’ Scale: 1”= 20’-0” N. HARBOR BLVD W. VICTOR AVEW. ROMNEYA DR.03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-6 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN 0 10’20’40’ Scale: 1”= 20’-0” Wood Fence, 36” ht. Wood Fence, 24” ht. Wood Gate, Match Height of Adjacent Fence LEGEND WOOD GATE Color: Per Colorist WOOD FENCE Color: Per Colorist 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-7 ANAHEIM B HARBOR -CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANT PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WUCOLS SHRUB SCHEDULE: Agave spp. Aloe spp. Asparagus densiflorus ‘Myers Fern’ Bougainvillea ‘La Jolla’ Dianella revoluta ‘Little Rev’ Dasylirion wheeleri Hesperaloe parviflora ‘Brake Lights’ Lavandula dentata Leucophyllum f. ‘Green Cloud’ Ligustrum japonicum ‘Texanum’ Lomandra longifolia Prunus caroliniana ‘Bright n Tight’ Rhaphiolepis i. ‘Clara’ Rhaphiolepis i. ‘Majestic Beauty’ Rosa spp. Agave spp. Aloe spp. Myers Fern Asparagus La Jolla Bougainvillea Little Rev Flax Lily Desert Spoon Brake Lights Red Yucca French Lavender Green Cloud Texas Sage Waxleaf Privet Spiny-headed Mat Rush Cherry Laurel Clara Indian Hawthorn Majestic Beauty Hawthorn Rose spp. 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 15 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 15 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 36” o.c. 30” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 24” o.c. 48” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 30” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 36” o.c. 24: o.c. 36” o.c. 30” o.c. L L M L L VL VL L L M L M L L M BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE FORM WUCOLS TREE SCHEDULE: Street Trees Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Platanus racemosa Accent Trees Jacaranda mimosifolia Quercus virginiana Patio Trees Arbutus unedo ‘Marina’ Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’ Screen Trees Podocarpus macrophyllus Tristania conferta Vertical Trees Aloe ‘Hercules’ Podocarpus macrophyllus Little Gem Magnolia Western Sycamore Jacaranda Southern Live Oak Marina Strawberry Tree Bradford Pear Yew Pine Brisbane Box Hercules Aloe Yew Pine 36” min 24” min 36” min 24”min 24” min 36” min 24” min 24” min 24” min 24” min Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard M M M M L M M M L M BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WUCOLS GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE: Bulbine frutescens ‘Tiny Tangerine’ Carissa macrocarpa ‘Green Carpet’ Lantana montevidensis Senecio mandraliscae Trachelospermum jasminoides Tiny Tangerine Bulbine Green Carpet Natal Plum Trailing Lantana Kleinia Star Jasmine 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 18” o.c. 24” o.c. 24” o.c. 18” o.c. 24” o.c. L L L L M Note: 1. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Shrubbery or ground cover should not generally exceed three feet in height and tree branches should not descend below six feet from the ground. 2. Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. 0 SCALE: 1" = 40' 20 40 80 EV EV EV EV FIRE LANE ATTACHMENT 7 From:Nancy Holloway To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:[EXTERNAL] Harbor/Victor project on Planning Agenda Date:Monday, March 28, 2022 1:53:54 PM Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Nicholas, I will be attending the meeting this afternoon but would like to get a couple of things out before. The 'dog run' along the north/south portion of the property would make a great exit only for the complex since the Harbor exit will be 'right' turn only. I understand it is too narrow for an entrance and exit. Victor would be the primary exit for all vehicles (as noted in the study) and for cars making a left turn. Is there a signal proposed? If not, you may have a huge increase of accidents with people making left turns onto Harbor which is extremely busy in both directions. If the exit for Romneya could be used as an exit only the vehicles could use the signal at Harbor for their left turns which is so much safer. I cannot agree with the studies estimates for 12 AM trips at peak time and 16 in the PM. 209 daily trips for the entire complex is absurd. I see some of the garages proposed are tandem. From my experience as a Realtor, buyers do not like and do not use the front spot for parking and will park elsewhere in the complex or outside. I understand it will be in the CC&Rs that they must use their garage for parking but will it be enforced? I doubt it. Victor has been impacted by the permit parking on Romney and some side streets so our street is already heavily used by non residents. The mobile home park on Romneya has 57 trailers and not enough parking. The small trailer park also has more than 7 residential units and minimal parking. Residents of Julianna have also complained about parking by non residents. Thank you. -- Nancy Holloway Regeneration Property Group LATE CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 3 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 28, 2022 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 (DEV2021-00094) LOCATION: 100 South Manchester Avenue APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Anaheim Transportation Network, represented by Diana Kotler, and the property owner is The City of Anaheim. REQUEST: The applicant requests to construct an 18,349 square foot administration and bus maintenance facility for the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) with a request for landscape setbacks that are less than required by Code and fewer parking spaces than required by Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, and approving Variance No. 2021-05153. BACKGROUND: Project Site: The linear, irregularly-shaped project site is 1.29-acres in area. The site is currently vacant and was previously used as a construction vehicle storage yard. The project site is bordered by Lincoln Avenue to the north, Interstate 5 (I-5) to the east, Adams Street to the south, and Manchester Avenue to the west. Surrounding Uses: Direction Existing Land Uses Zone Classification North Lincoln Avenue and I-5 Not Applicable South Light industrial uses including automobile repair and body work, and Union Pacific West Anaheim Yard across Manchester Avenue I Industrial East I-5 Not Applicable West Light industrial uses including self-storage, automobile repair, and a salvage yard across Manchester Avenue I Industrial VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 2 of 7 General Plan and Zoning Designation: The project site is zoned “C-G” General Commercial and is designated for General Commercial land uses in the Anaheim General Plan. PROPOSAL: Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) is a public transportation services provider that provides a public transit service known as Anaheim Resort Transportation (ART) in the greater Anaheim Resort area, including the cities of Anaheim, Orange, Garden Grove, Buena Park, and Costa Mesa. ART service connects 72 area hospitality establishments with local destinations and attractions. The applicant proposes to construct a two-story concrete tilt-up bus maintenance and administration building sited in the northern half of the project site. The 18,349 square foot two- story building would have a lobby, breakroom, offices, lockers, and bus maintenance workshop area on the first floor, and conference rooms, additional offices, and open loft area on the second floor. In addition, a 2,120-square-foot bus wash station is proposed in the southern portion of the site which would be developed as part of a future project phase. The proposed project would support the ATN transit operations and maintenance. The proposal includes a request for landscape setbacks that are less than required by Code and fewer parking spaces than required by Code. Parking: Off-street parking would be provided in a surface parking lot containing 21 stalls located north of the proposed building near the Manchester Avenue and Lincoln Avenue intersection. In addition, 12 parallel parking spaces would be located in the southern portion of the project site abutting the I-5 right-of-way. In total, the project would provide 33 passenger vehicle stalls, including 11 standard stalls, 12 parallel stalls, 2 van accessible stalls, 1 delivery and loading stall, 3 standard electric vehicle (EV) stalls, 1 van accessible EV stall, and 3 clean air vanpool stalls. Circulation/Project Driveways: The applicant has requested deviations from the City’s standard driveway width in order to accommodate bus ingress and egress. The City’s standard maximum driveway width for commercial development is 30 feet. The City Engineer has approved deviations from this standard for bus ingress and egress (Attachment 4) as outlined in the table below: VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Proposed Driveways Driveway Location Width Movement Restriction 1 380 feet south of Lincoln Avenue 24 feet Right-In, Right Out Open to public 2 Across Adams Street 56 feet Right-In Only Gated – only for ATN vehicles and buses 3 435 feet north of Broadway 66 feet Right-Out Only Gated – only for ATN vehicles and buses ATN buses would enter the project site from Driveway 3 to access the proposed bus wash facility or maintenance bays at the southern end of the bus facility building. ATN buses would have radio frequency identification (RFID) to permit ingress to the sliding gate access. As a result, gates would automatically open when buses approach the driveway. To exit the project site, buses would use Driveway 2. Both Driveway 2 and 3 would be restricted to right-turn in and out movements due to the raised median on Manchester Avenue. All driveways would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers for emergency and fire vehicles. CIRCULATION Building Design: The proposed architecture is modern industrial. The proposed bus maintenance and administration building would use a variety of different materials including aluminum composite metal coverings, plaster, metal coping, and exposed concrete masonry units. The building would have a blue and grey color scheme. The bus maintenance and administration building would have an aluminum storefront main entrance with insulated glass. Windows would be provided on the second floor for the administrative offices. 3 2 1 VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 4 of 7 BUILDING DESIGN Operations: Administration operations would occur seven days a week between the hours of 6:00 AM and 10:00 PM, with up to 28 administrative and four maintenance staff on the project site between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Fleet preparation and routine upkeep maintenance activities would occur seven days a week between 10:00 PM and 4:30 AM. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The proposed administration and bus maintenance facility is classified as a Public Services use, which is a permitted use in the C-G zone. However, due to the request for landscape setback and parking variances, the proposed project is subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. Parking Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve the parking variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; 2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance with subsection .030 of Section 18.42.050 (Non- Residential Uses- Shared Parking Arrangements)); 4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 5 of 7 Section 18.42.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Code provides off-street parking requirements for non-residential uses. The requirements are determined by the type of use or use class. ATN’s bus operations and maintenance facility land use classification is Public Services facility. This use class consists of administrative, clerical, direct service-related, or public contact offices of federal, state or local government agencies, together with incidental storage and maintenance of government vehicles. This classification includes offices and post offices. The parking requirement for a Public Service facility is four parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area for buildings of three stories or lower. Code requires 73 parking spaces on the subject site and the applicant proposes 33 parking spaces. Given the physical constraints of the site, including the odd shape and narrow width, it is not possible to provide 73 parking spaces on the site. ATN’s proposed bus operations and maintenance bus facility would house a bus maintenance facility with three bus bays on the ground floor. The majority of the maintenance work would occur outside of regular business hours. A maximum of 4 maintenance staff are expected to be on site between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM, when the peak parking demand will be generated by the operations portion of the building. Fleet preparation and routine upkeep maintenance activities would occur seven days a week between 10 PM and 4:30 AM when the 33 on-site parking spaces would be available. The bus maintenance area would be used to service ATN’s fleet only, with no visitors from the general public generating vehicle trips or parking demand at the site other than for employees. The 7,000 square feet of space on the second level of the building would be used by ATN employees for administrative staff and operations use. For this space, the off-street requirement calculations for public services use could reasonably be applied. Based on the above, the applicant’s parking demand analysis has determined that the parking demand for the subject use during the peak hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM is 32 spaces as outlined below: Use Size Parking Demand Spaces Needed Spaces Provided Bus Maintenance 11,349 sf 1 per employee 4 employees/4 spaces 4 Office 7,000 sf 4 spaces per 1,000 sf 28 spaces 29 Total Spaces 32 33 Staff believes that the findings can be made to approve the requested parking variance based on the following: The physical constraints of the subject site limit the amount of parking that can be provided on-site; the maximum parking demand of the proposed use is expected to be 32 parking spaces and the proposed site plan includes 33 spaces; the proposed use will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets, or private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; the proposed use will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and the proposed use will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 6 of 7 Setback Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve the setback variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of special circumstances shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Section 18.08.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code outlines setback requirements in commercial zones. For properties within General Commercial zones, the minimum landscape setback requirement is 10 feet from a freeway right-of-way (ROW). Parking spaces may encroach into required structural setback areas, but shall not encroach into minimum required landscape setbacks. The subject site is significantly constrained due to its odd shape and extremely narrow depth. At the longest point, the site is approximately 93 feet deep, but less than a quarter of the site measures 93 feet. The site narrows to the south down to 45 feet near the south access driveway. The proposed off-street parking lot would be located on the north side of the building. In addition, parallel parking spaces are proposed on the southern portion of the site along the I-5 ROW. Due to the 10-foot landscape setback requirement along Manchester Avenue and the 10-foot landscape setback along the I-5 freeway ROW, providing the required parking on the site is not feasible if parking spaces are not allowed within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway ROW. As outlined on the project plans the following elements would encroach within the 10-foot I-5 Freeway ROW landscape setback: • 14 parking stalls and 1 loading space in the parking lot on the north side of the building • A solar canopy shade structure over the parking 14 stalls • 13 parallel parking stalls and a trash enclosure along the east property line south of the building Due to the odd shape and significantly constrained depth of the subject site, and the requirement for a 10-foot front landscape setback and a 10-foot rear landscape setback, the usable site area is less than 19 feet wide in certain areas. Due to these site constraints, staff believes the variance request for a reduced landscaped setback along the I-5 ROW is justified. Environmental Impact Analysis: The Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Section 15332 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). Based on the analysis in the CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption Environmental Checklist (Attachment 7), staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 March 28, 2022 Page 7 of 7 requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further environmental review is required. CONCLUSION: The proposed administration and bus maintenance facility is classified as a public service facility, which is a permitted use in the C-G zone. The requested variances for reduced parking and a reduced landscape setback are justified given the physical constraints of the subject site as outlined in the analysis contained herein. Based on the analysis included in this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution and approve the parking and landscape setback variances. Prepared by, Submitted by, Thomas Gorham Niki Wetzel, AICP Contract Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Project Plans 3. Applicant Letter of Request 4. City Engineer Driveway Width Deviation Approval 5. Variance Justification- Parking 6. Variance Justification – Setbacks 7. CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption Environmental Checklist 8. Vicinity Map 9. Aerial Map [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2021-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00094) (100 South Manchester Avenue) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Variance No. 2021-05153 for approval to construct an 18,349 square foot administration and bus maintenance facility for the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) landscape setbacks that are less than required by Code; and to permit fewer parking spaces than required by Code (the “Proposed Project”), on certain real property located at 100 South Manchester Avenue (the “Property”) in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.29 acres in area and is currently vacant. The Property is designated for General Commercial land uses by the Anaheim General Plan and is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 28, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., with notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance No. 2021-05153 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000- 21189.57) as set forth in Section 15332and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387); and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Variance No. 2021-05153 to permit fewer parking spaces than required by Code and to permit building and landscaping setbacks that are less than required by Code, does find and determine the following: - 2 - PC2022-*** SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum Number of Parking Spaces. (73 spaces required; 33 spaces proposed) 1. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the Property than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to all uses at the Property under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such uses. The applicant submitted a Parking Variance Justification, which included a parking demand analysis to determine the actual parking demand for the administration and bus maintenance facility. The parking demand analysis determined that the parking demand for the subject use during the peak hours of 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM is 32 parking spaces. The project will provide 33 parking spaces on-site. Based on the information provided, there would be adequate on-site parking for the Proposed Project. 2. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands of the use on the Property. 3. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Property because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of the use on Property. 4. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas because the Property provides adequate ingress and egress points, which are designed to allow for adequate on- site circulation. 5. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity because the Property will provide ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Property; and Landscape Setback Variance 1. The subject site is significantly constrained due to its odd shape and narrow depth. The site is approximately 800 feet long, and varies in width from 45 feet to 93 feet. These unique site configuration circumstances generally do not apply to other commercial zoned properties in the vicinity. 2. Given the physical constraints of the site, including the odd shape and narrow width, as well as the code required 10-foot landscape setback requirement along Manchester Avenue and the 10-foot landscape setback along the I-5 freeway right- of-way, providing the required parking on the site is not feasible if parking spaces are not allowed within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway ROW. In this - 3 - PC2022-*** instance, the strict application of the zoning code would deprive the property privileges enjoyed by other commercial zoned properties in the vicinity; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2021-05153, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property for which Variance No. 2021-05153 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. - 4 - PC2022-*** CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Simonne Fannin, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 28, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of March, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2021-05153 (DEV2021-00094) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. All onsite utilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Owner and the grading plans shall be labeled accordingly. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 Prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build- out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The Owner/Developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of the Right of Way Construction Permit. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 The Owner/Developer shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 7 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 6 Submit the final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects, identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 7 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 A Fire Master Plan (Fire access plan) shall be submitted to the fire department for review. Fire Department Community Risk Reduction Division 9 All drivable surfaces - Permanent, temporary, and phased emergency access roads shall be designed and maintained to support an imposed load of 78,000 lbs. and surfaced to provide all-weather driving capabilities Fire Department Community Risk Reduction Division 10 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 11 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS 12 The Owner/Developer is responsible for obtaining any required permit and/or other form of approval from Caltrans for any proposed project improvement within the State right-of-way and improvement such as freeway signs within the City right-of-way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 13 That prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans shall show R1- 1 (STOP) sign, R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign, STOP pavement legend, and right-turn arrow pavement legend at the north project driveway to the employee parking lot. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division - 8 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 14 That prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans shall show R3- 5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign at the bus exit driveway and R6- 1(R) (ONE-WAY) sign on the median directly in front of the project driveway. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 15 Prior to the issuance of building permits, street improvement plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department – Traffic Engineering for review and approval of proposed signing and/or red curb painting on the east side of Manchester Avenue adjacent to the project accesses. Signage and curb painting modifications shall be installed per the approved plans and shall be completed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 16 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 17 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 18 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 19 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) A twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement, Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 9 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner/Developer and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. 20 The Car Wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 21 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 22 Water improvement plans shall be submitted by the applicant to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 23 Individual water service and/or fire line connections shall be provided by the applicant for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 24 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 25 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 26 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate (varies to 6.25') to the City of Anaheim an easement along Manchester Ave to accommodate the deficient supplemental right turn lane, for road, public utilities and other public purposes. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 27 The Owner/Developer shall submit improvement plans to obtain a Right of Way Construction Permit (RCP) to Development Services Division for the construction of required public improvements on Manchester Ave and all work performed in the public right-of-way for review and approval. The improvements shall include but not limited to curb and gutter, pavement, pavement transitions, driveway, parkway, sidewalk, parkway drains, water meter removals, sewer laterals, etc. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 10 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 28 The Owner/Developer’s engineer shall submit to the City for review and approval an engineering cost estimate for the cost of the required improvements on Manchester Ave. The Developer shall post a security (Performance and Labor & Materials Bonds) in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney for the construction of all required off-site and public improvements within Manchester Ave. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 29 A cash-in-lieu payment, in an amount determined and approved by the City Engineer to pay for future street widening and improvements along Manchester Ave, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 30 The legal owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Development Services Division. The Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 31 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Lot Line Adjustment document. The document shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with conforming deed, in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 32 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works Department, Development Services Division 33 Submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works Department, Development Services Division PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 34 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 35 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering - 11 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 36 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer/applicant, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 37 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 38 All required WQMP improvements shall be operational and verified by the Construction Services Division Inspector. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 39 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 40 The Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division ON-GOING DURING OPERATIONS 41 All new landscaping shall be installed by the applicant in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 42 A total of 33 parking spaces shall be continuously maintained on the project site consistent with the approved project plans. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 43 The applicant shall maintain trees in good health in perpetuity along the easterly property line to provide adequate screening and privacy from adjacent property, in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 44 The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right- of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface Public Utilities Water Engineering - 12 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. 45 Ongoing during project operation, transponder from incoming buses shall be activated at a distance in advance of gate opening to allow sufficient time for the gate to be opened prior to buses arrival to prevent bus from queuing on Manchester Avenue. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division GENERAL 46 The following minimum horizontal clearances shall be maintained by the owner/applicant between proposed water main and other facilities: a. 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals b. 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities, including storm drains, gas, and electric c. 6-feet minimum separation from curb face d. 10-feet minimum separation from structures, footings, and trees. e. 12-inch minimum vertical separation from other utilities. The following minimum clearances shall be provided by the owner/applicant around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): a. 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. b. 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities Water Engineering 47 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities Water Engineering 48 Vehicle gates to the employee parking lot shall not be installed across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, gates shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division - 13 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 49 The project driveways on Manchester Avenue shall be right-turn in/out only driveways. Should the measures constructed at the driveways on Manchester Avenue to prevent southbound left-turns in and westbound left-turns out of the project prove to be ineffective, project developer/owner shall be required to revise the measures and construct alternative measures, at owner cost, until an effective measure is found and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 50 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant, which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 51 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed by the applicant on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 52 The Applicant/Owner/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division N NOT TO SCALE 5 PROJECT SITE W. BROADWAY W . B R O A D W A Y W . C H E S T N U T S T .S. WEST ST.W . C E N T E R S T .S. WALNUT ST.S. CHERRT ST.W. MABLE ST. L I N C O L N A V E . N. WILSHIRE AVE. SANTA ANA FW Y S. MANCHESTER AVE.5 5 OWNER GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARCHITECT OWNER'S CONSULTANTS ARCHITECT'S CONSULTANTSVICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802 ANAHEIM RESORT TRANSPORTATION ANAHEIM TRANSPORTATION NETWORK JIM APPLEBY 1354 SOUTH ANAHEIM BLVD. ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 PH: (714) 563-5287 JAppleby@atnetwork.org 18301 VON KARMAN UPRITE CONSTRUCTION VIKRAM SUNDARAM SUITE 210 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92612 PH: (949) 877-8877 vikram.sundaram@upriteco.com P 949.660.912810 EDELMAN IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 F 949.863.1581 CORY ADAMS MTGL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRUCE HICK 2993 E/\. L.A. PALMA AVE, SUITE A ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92806 PH: (661) 233-5229 BHICK@MTGINC.COM STANTEC UTILITY CONSULTANT PATRICK M. MCKELVEY 523 EST 6TH STREET SUITE 1200 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014 PH: (213) 955-3530 pat.mckelvey@stantec.com IBI GROUP PROGRAMMING CONSULTANT LYDIA LA POINT 421 FAYETTEVILLE STREET, SUITE 1609 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27601 PH: (310) 561-0065 llapoint@IBIGroup.com ANSER ADVISORY PROJECT MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT ADAM TOBIN 1820 E. FIRST STREET, SUITE 410 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9705 PH: (310) 561-0065 adam.tobin@anseradvisory.com RPM ENGINEERS, INC. MECHANICAL ENGINEER RAYMOND PHUA, P.E. 102 DISCOVERY IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PH: (949) 450-1229 X201 rayp@rpmpe.com RPM ENGINEERS, INC. PLUMBING ENGINEER RAYMOND PHUA, P.E. 102 DISCOVERY IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PH: (949) 450-1229 X201 rayp@rpmpe.com BTI CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER RAFEEK BUSHRA, S.E. 2564 W. WOODLAND DR. ANAHEIN, CALIFORNIA 92801 PH: (714) 522-0911 X 303 rafeek@btincse.com RPM ENGINEERS, INC. ELECTRICAL RAYMOND PHUA, P.E. 102 DISCOVERY IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PH: (949) 450-1229 X201 rayp@rpmpe.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT COLLEEN M. NOLAN 13355 SILVERADO COURT CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92883 PH: (714) 743-7915 CNOLAN@COX.NET WARE MALCOMB CIVIL ENGINEER LUCAR CORSBIE 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PH: (949) 660-9128 lcorsbie@waremalcomb.com NEW CONSTRUCTION OF ADMINISTRATION & BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY FOR ANEHEIM TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, WHICH CONSISTS OF BUS MAINTENANCE WORKSHOP ON THE GROUND FLOOR WITH STORAGE & EMPLOYEE BREAK AREA AND ATN'S ADMINISTRATION OFFICE ON THE SECOND FLOOR. THERE IS ALSO A FUTURE BUS WASH STATION THAT IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A FUTURE PHASE. SCOPE OF WORK ADMINISTRATION & BUS MAINTENANCE FACILITY ARCHITECTURAL A-01 TITLE SHEET A-01a PROJECT DATA A-10 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A-11 ENLARGED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A-21 FLOOR PLANS A-41 COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-42 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-71 DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS A-81 DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL SHEET COUNT: 9 CIVIL C-1.0 SITE PLAN C-2.0 TURNING STUDY C-3.0 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C-3.1 GRADING SECTIONS C-4.0 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN CIVIL SHEET COUNT: 5 ELECTRICAL E-2.2 SITE PLAN & SITE PHOTOMETRIC ELECTRICAL SHEET COUNT: 1 PHOTOVOLTAIC G-100 PROPOSED SITE PLAN G-101 PV ARRAY AND EQUIPMENT DETAIL E-5.0 LIGHTING PLAN E-7.0 ELECTRICAL DETAILS PHOTOVOLTAIC SHEET COUNT: 4 LANDSCAPE L1.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE SHEET COUNT: 1 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:59:30 PMC.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00TITLE SHEET A-01ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023ATTACHMENT 2 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:45:05 PMApprover Author IRV19-0222-00PROJECT DATAA-01aATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802QUAL. QUALITY QUAN. QUANTITY R. RISER R.B. RUBBER / RESILIENT BASE R.C.P. REFLECTED CEILING PLAN R.D. ROOF DRAIN R.O. ROUGH OPENING R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY R.T.U. ROOF TOP UNIT R.W.L. RAIN WATER LEADER RAD. RADIUS REF. REFERENCE REFR. REFRIGERATOR REINF. REINFORCE(D) REQ. REQUIRED RESIL. RESILIENT RGTR. REGISTER RM. ROOM RWD. REDWOOD S. SOUTH S.A.F. SELF-ADHERED FLASHING S.C. SOLID CORE S.C.D. SEAT COVER DISPENSER S.D. SOAP DISPENSER S.F. SQUARE FOOT S.I. SQUARE INCH S.N.D. SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER S.N.R. SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE S.S. STAINLESS STEEL S.SK. SERVICE SINK S.T.C. SOUND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENT SCHED. SCHEDULE SCWD. SOLID CORE WOOD SECT. SECTION SH. SHELF SHR. SHOWER SHT. SHEET SIM. SIMILAR SPEC. SPECIFIED or SPECIFICATION SQ. SQUARE STA. STATION STD. STANDARD STL. STEEL STOR. STORAGE STRL. STRUCTURE or STRUCTURAL SUPP. SUPPLEMENT or SUPPLEMENTARY SUSP. SUSPENDED SYMM. SYMMETRICAL T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE T. TREAD T.B. TOWEL BAR T.C. TOP OF CURB T.D. TRENCH DRAIN T.O.C. TOP OF CONCRETE T.O.M. TOP OF MULLION T.O.P. TOP OF PARAPET T.O.R. TOP OF REVEAL T.O.REC. TOP OF DEEP RECESS T.O.S. TOP OF STEEL T.O.W. TOP OF WALL T.P. TOP OF PAVEMENT T.P.D. TOILET PAPER DISPENSER T.V. TELEVISION TEL. TELEPHONE TER. TERRAZZO THK. THICK TOL. TOLERANCE TYP. TYPICAL U.C. UNDERCUT U.H. UNIT HEATER U.L. UNDERWRITERS' LABORATORIES U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED UNF. UNFINISHED UR. URINAL V.C.T. VINYL COMPOSITE TILE V.I.F. VERIFY IN FIELD V.P. VISION PANEL V.R. VAPOR RETARDER VAC. VACUUM VERT. VERTICAL VEST. VESTIBULE VIT. VITREOUS W. WEST W.C. WATER CLOSET W.I. WROUGHT IRON W.P. WORKING POINT W.S. WEATHER STOP or STRIPPING W.W.F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WD. WOOD WPM WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE WRB WEATHER / WATER RESISTIVE BARRIER WSCT. WAINSCOT WT. WEIGHT FURR. FURRING FUT. FUTURE G.B. GRAB BAR G.C. GENERAL CONTRACTOR G.F.I. GROUND FAULT INTERRUPT GA. GAUGE GALV. GALVANIZED GL. GLASS GND. GROUND GR. GRADE GYP. GYPSUM H.B. HOSE BIBB H.C. HOLLOW CORE H.M. HOLLOW METAL H.P. HIGH POINT H.V. HIGH VOLTAGE HDWD. HARDWOOD HDWE. HARDWARE HORIZ. HORIZONTAL HR. HOUR HT. HEIGHT I.D. INSIDE DIMENSION I.H.P. INTERMEDIATE HIGH POINT INSUL. INSULATION or INSULATED INT. INTERIOR J.B. JUNCTION BOX JAN. JANITOR JST. JOIST JT. JOINT K.O. KNOCK-OUT K.P. KICK PLATE K.W.H. KILOWATT HOUR KIT. KITCHEN L.P. LOW POINT L.S. LIMESTONE L.V. LOW VOLTAGE L.W.C. LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE LAB. LABORATORY LAM. LAMINATE(D) LAV. LAVATORY LIN. LINEAR LIQ. LIQUID LKR. LOCKER LT. LIGHT LTL. LINTEL LVR. LOUVER M.B. MOP BASIN M.C. MEDICINE CABINET M.O. MASONRY OPENING MAINT. MAINTENANCE MAN. MANUAL MAS. MASONRY MAX. MAXIMUM MECH. MECHANICAL MEMB. MEMBRANE MET. METAL MEZZ. MEZZANINE MFR. MANUFACTURER MH. MANHOLE MIN. MINIMUM MIR. MIRROR MISC. MISCELLANEOUS MTD. MOUNTED MUL. MULLION N. NORTH N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT N.R.C. NOISE REDUCTION COEFFICIENT N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE NO. NUMBER NOM. NOMINAL O.A. OVERALL O.C. ON CENTER O.D. OUTSIDE DIAMETER O.F. OUTSIDE FACE O.H. OVERHEAD or OPPOSITE HAND OBS. OBSCURE OFF. OFFICE OPNG. OPENING OPP. OPPOSITE P.C. PRECAST P.J. PANEL JOINT P.LAM. PLASTIC LAMINATE P.S.F. POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT P.T.D. PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER P.T.R. PAPER TOWER RECEPTACLE PL. PLATE PLAS. PLASTER PLYWD. PLYWOOD POL. POLISH(ED) PR. PAIR PT. POINT Q.T. QUARRY TILE ANGLE CENTERLINE # POUND or NUMBER & AND (E) EXISTING @ AT ~ DIAMETER or ROUND Ø DIAMETER A.D. AREA DRAIN ACOUS. ACOUSTICAL ADJ. ADJUST, ADJUSTABLE or ADJACENT AGGR. AGGREGATE AL. ALUMINUM APPROX. APPROXIMATE(LY) ARCH. ARCHITECTURAL ASB. ASBESTOS ASPH. ASPHALT B.O.C. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE B.O.CMU. BOTTOM OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT B.O.M. BOTTOM OF MULLION B.O.P. BOTTOM OF PANEL B.O.R. BOTTOM OF REVEAL BD. BOARD BITUM. BITUMINOUS BLDG. BUILDING BLK. BLOCK BLKG. BLOCKING BM. BEAM BOT. BOTTOM C.B. CATCH BASIN C.G. CORNER GUARD C.I. CAST IRON C.O. CASED OPENING C.O.M. CENTER OF MULLION C.O.R. CENTER OF REVEAL CAB. CABINET CEM. CEMENT(ITIOUS) CER. CERAMIC CLG. CEILING CLKG. CAULKING CLO. CLOSET CLR. CLEAR CNTR. COUNTER COL. COLUMN CONC. CONCRETE CONN. CONNECTION CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CONTINUOUS CORR. CORRIDOR CTR. CENTER CTSK. COUNTER-SUNK D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN D.O. DOOR OPENING D.S. DOWNSPOUT D.S.P. DRY STANDPIPE DBL. DOUBLE DEPT. DEPARTMENT DET. DETAIL DIA. DIAMETER DIM. DIMENSION DISP. DISPENSER DN. DOWN DR. DOOR DWG. DRAWING DWR. DRAWER E. EAST E.J. EXPANSION JOINT E.P. ELECTRIC PANELBOARD E.W.C. ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EA. EACH EL. ELEVATION ELEC. ELECTRIC(AL) ELEV. ELEVATOR EMER. EMERGENCY ENCL. ENCLOSED or ENCLOSURE EQ. EQUAL EQPT. EQUIPMENT EXP. EXPANSION EXPO. EXPOSED EXST. EXISTING EXT. EXTERIOR F.A. FIRE ALARM F.A.R. FLOOR AREA RATIO F.B. FLAT BAR F.D. FLOOR DRAIN F.E. FIRE EXTINGUISHER F.E.C. FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET F.H.C. FIRE HOSE CABINET F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.CMU. FACE OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT F.O.F. FACE OF FINISH F.O.M. FACE OF MULLION F.O.SH. FACE OF SHEATHING F.P. FIREPROOF F.S. FULL SIZE FDN. FOUNDATION FIN. FINISH(ED) FL. FLOOR FLASH. FLASHING FLUOR. FLUORESCENT FT. FOOT or FEET FTG. FOOTING ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS PROJECT DATA NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST > 20 UNLIMITED UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ARE PERMITTED FLOOR 1EXTERIOR WALLS (Ap/ap)+(Au/au)ALLWBL. AREA OF UNPRTCT'D OPENINGS (au)ACTUAL AREA OF UNPRTCT'D OPENINGS (Au)ALLWBL. AREA OF PROTECTED OPENINGS (ap)ACTUAL AREA OF PROTECTED OPENINGS (Ap)EXTERIOR WALL AREA (SF)ALLOWABLE AREA (%)FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE (FT)OCCUPANCY SECTION USE PROPOSED AREA (SF) SEE ALLOWABLE AREA BELOWS-1 / STORAGE (311)BUS MAINTENANCE/REPAIR MAIN OCCUPANCY (TABLE 504.3)ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEETSPRINKLER CONDITION(504.4) ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANEPROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEETALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT:PROPOSED NUMBER OF STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANE33'-6"2 STORY3 STORY75'-0"S-1 S UNLIMITED AREA ALLOWED PER W/ AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER AND OPEN YARDS GREATER THAN 60 FEET ON ALL SIDES ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA: 507.9 PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA 18,349 S.F. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (602)TYPE:III-B STRUCTURAL FRAME 0 HR. EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS 2 HR. BUILDING ELEMENTS (TABLE 601) INTERIOR BEARING WALLS 0 HR. EXTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS SEE BELOW INTERIOR NON-BEARING WALLS 0 HR. FLOORS 0 HR. ROOF 0 HR. EXTERIOR WALLS BASED ON FIRE SEPARATION (TABLE 602) EXTERIOR WALLS ( 10< X < 30)1 HR. CHAPTER 6 - TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION CHAPTER 5 - GENERAL BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREAS CHAPTER 3 - USE & OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION LOT 55,756 S.F.(1.28 ACRES) BUILDING 1 AREA 18,349 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE 20 % LANDSCAPE AREA 11,016 S.F. LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 19 % PARKING REQUIRED 1/300 OFFICE OFFICE 28 REQUIRED BUILDING 1 STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED 30 STALLS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED 3 STALLS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 33 STALLS MOTORCYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 0 STALLS ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NO:2501329 SITE DATA CHAPTER 10 - MEANS OF EGRESS (SEE OCCUPANCY AND EGRESS PLANS) APPLICABLE CODES CITY OF:ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA BUILDING:2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE STRUCTURE:2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE MECHANICAL:2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE ELECTRICAL:2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE PLUMBING:2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE FIRE / LIFE SAFETY:2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS) ENERGY:2019 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 2019 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE ACCESSIBILITY:2019 STATE OF CALIFORNIA TITLE 24 ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS CHAPTER 9 - FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (903.3.1.1) AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED AND INSTALLED WITH ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13. (903.4) AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM MONITORING AND ALARMS WILL BE PROVIDED. CHAPTER 7 - FIRE AND SMOKE PROTECTION FEATURES ALLOWABLE AREA OF OPENINGS (TABLE 705.8)(FULLY SPRINKLERED THROUGHOUT) FINISH AND MATERIALS LEGEND BUILDING ELEMENT TYPES RF1 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING OVER WOOD DECK. ROOF TYPES CL1 GYPSUM BOARD OVER 6" CEILING JOIST. CL2 1 HOUR RATED FIRE RESISTANT GYPSUM BOARD OVER 6" CEILING JOISTS. CL3 1 HOUR RATED FIRE RESISTANT PLASTER DIRECTLY APPLIED. CL4 PLASTER DIRECTLY APPLIED. CL5 GYPSUM BOARD DIRECTLY APPLIED ON TJI FRAMING. CEILING TYPES GLAZING SYSTEMS SF EXTERIOR STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" THICK INSULATED GLASS, CENTER-GLAZED. EXTERIOR WALL TYPES CMU EXTERIOR CONCRETE MASONRY WALL. MTL EXTERIOR CORRUGATED METAL PANEL OVER WRB OVER CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT. PST EXTERIOR PLASTER OVER METAL LATH AND WRB OVER 1/2" GLASS-MAT GYPSUM SHEATHING BOARD OVER CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT. PST1 EXTERIOR PLASTER OVER METAL LATH AND WRB OVER 1/2" GLASS-MAT GYPSUM SHEATHING BOARD OVER 3-5/8" METAL STUD FRAMING. FLOOR TYPES INTERIOR WALL TYPES 1b3 FULL HEIGHT 1-HR RATED BARRIER WITH TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OVER 3-5/8" METAL STUD FRAMING 1p3 FULL HEIGHT 1-HR RATED PARTITION WITH TYPE "X" GYPSUM BOARD BOTH SIDES OVER 3-5/8" METAL STUD FRAMING 1s4 1HR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED SHAFT WALL CONSTRUCTION. 4" CH STUD FRAMING. B3 PLUMBING WALL WITH MOISTURE-RESISTANT BOARD ON ONE SIDE OVER 3-5/8" METAL STUD FRAMING, PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING. Bf6 FULL HEIGHT PLUMBING WALL WITH MOISTURE-RESISTANT BOARD ON BOTH SIDES OVER 3-5/8" METAL STUD FRAMING. CMU CONCRETE MASONRY WALL. CON CONCRETE CURB WALL. F3 FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTURE U2 PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING WITH GYPSUM BOARD ONE SIDE OVER 2-1/2" METAL STUD FRAMING. Uf2 FULL HEIGHT PARTITION WITH GYPSUM BOARD ONE SIDE OVER 2-1/2" METAL STUD FRAMING. WM WIRE MESH FENCING SYSTEM. FR1 CONCRETE SLAB, PROVIDE VAPOR BARRIER OVER SAND PER SOILS REPORT. FR2 1.5" LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE OVER PLY SHEATHING OVER I TRUS JOIST. COORDINATE WITH STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ST1 CONCRETE-FILLED METAL PAN STEEL STAIRS, WITH METAL GUARD AND HANDRAILS. PAINTED. STAIR TYPES SEE ALLOWABLE AREA BELOWB / BUSINESS (304) OFFICE SEE ALLOWABLE AREA BELOWA-3 / ASSEMBLY (303.4)CONFERENCE ROOM MATERIALS LEGEND FIRST FLOOR 11,286 S.F. SECOND FLOOR 7,063 S.F.DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTALEXTERIOR ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS. EXTERIOR SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH WITH INTEGRAL COLOR OVER MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS. MATERIALS: METAL COPING, PAINTED EXPOSED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: SOLARBAN R100 (2) CLEAR U FACTOR = 0.29 AND SHGC = 0.23 GLASS: VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS MATERIALS LEGEND 06/30/2023 8'-6" TYP.18'-0"TYP.24'-0"18'-0"9'-0"10'-0"15'-0"22'-0" TYP.8'-0" TYP.15'-0"12'-0" T 10 5 6 12 TYP. 107 118 136 118 107 105 103 111 104 100 126 EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYT E E E E E E E E MMMEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYNO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV 18" 18" 18" 24"24"24" 18" 24"24"16"12" 24"24" 24" 16"16" 16" 24" 16" 24"30" S DSD S D S D S D E E E E E E E E MMM T S D UP SEE SHEET A0.2 FOR GENERAL NOTES 100. PROPERTY LINE. 101. (N) ACCESSIBLE ENTRY SIGNAGE. 102. (N) ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH SIGNAGE. 103. FUTURE BUS WASH STATION. (NOT) IN CURRENT SCOPE) 104. (N) PAINTED PARKING STRIPING PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STANDARDS. 105. (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH RECYCLE BIN. 106. (N) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. 107. (N) LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREA. 108. NOT USED. 109. (N) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES. 110. (N) TUBE STEEL FENCE. 111. (N) TUBE STEEL ROLLING GATE. 112. (N) AC PAVING. 113. (N) CONCRETE RAMP. 114. (E) CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 115. (E) SETBACK LINE. 116. (E) GRAVEL AREA. 117. (N) BUILDING, GATES, FENCES OR WALLS WITHIN SETBACK. 118. (N) SITE WALLS THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC STREET WILL HAVE ANTI-GRAFFITI PAINT. PER CITY FORM Z410. TYP. 119. (N) PCC PAVING. 120. (E) CAL TRANS EASEMENT. 121. (E) CITY OF ANAHEIM EASEMENT. 122. (N) PV CANOPY ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL FACILITIES 123. (N) PV CANOPY EXTENTS BY OTHERS 124. (N) R1-1 (STOP) & R3-5(R) (RIGHT TURN ONLY) SIGNS. 125. (N) KNOX BOX FOR FIRE ACCESS. 126. STRIPED TURN AROUND AREA. 127. ELECTRIC VEHICLE VAN STALL. 128. ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALL. 129. 6" CONCRETE BOLLARDS, PERMANENT. 130. PAVING AND DRIVE APRON PAVING MATERIAL, TYPICAL BOTH LOTS, ALL APRONS. SEE CIVIL DRAWING. 131. (N) DRIVEWAY APRON, SEE CIVIL DRAWING. 132. (N) LIGHT POLES. 133. HEAVY DASHED LINE INDICATES PATH OF TRAVEL. 134. PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC ROW. 135. (N) "NO TRESPASSING 602(K) P.C." SIGN 136. (N) TOW AWAY SIGN, PURSUANT TO 22658 (a) OF THE C.V.C. AND ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4.75.090. AND R100V(CA). 137. PROPOSED REDUCED SETBACK AREA PER VARIANCE APPLICATION 138. RELOCATED "NO PARKING ANYTIME" SIGN 139. RELOCATED LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN NOTES SITE LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 1. NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS NEEDED, DRIVEWAY SPACING AND DISTANCE TO R.O.W. CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 473. 2. DRIVEWAY DESIGN CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 115. 3. PARKING SPACE DESIGN CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 402,470,471. 4. ANY RELOCATION OF FREEWAY SIGNAGE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CALTRANS. 5. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. 11,000 7,000 SQ. FOOTAGE BUS MAINTENANCE OFFICE USE PARKING REQ'D 28 4 TOTAL: 32 TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 33 PARKING SUMMARY PER LETTER OF OPERATIONS PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL FIRE HYDRANT (VERIFY LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS) (N) TREES EVERY 20'-0" PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STANDARDSLINCOLN A V E N U E N MANCHESTER AVENUE W CENTER STREETS ADAMS STREET SANTA ANA FREEWAY A-11 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 1 123 123 X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XLANDSCAPESETBACK PROVIDED STANDARD STALLS (8.5' X 18')11 PARALLEL STALLS (8' X 22')12 ACCESSIBLE -VAN ACCESSIBLE 2 DELIVERY AND LOADING (12' X 18')1 EV CHARGING -STANDARD 3 -VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV 3 33 SEE DETAILS 3 & 4 ON SHEET A-8.1 SEE DETAILS 5 & 6 ON SHEET A-8.1 SEE DETAILS 1 & 2 ON SHEET A-8.1 FREESTANDING CMU WALL architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:59:32 PMC.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A-10ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN N 0 20'40'80'200' 1"=40'DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 SEE SHEET A0.2 FOR GENERAL NOTES 100. PROPERTY LINE. 101. (N) ACCESSIBLE ENTRY SIGNAGE. 102. (N) ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL WITH SIGNAGE. 103. FUTURE BUS WASH STATION. (NOT) IN CURRENT SCOPE) 104. (N) PAINTED PARKING STRIPING PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STANDARDS. 105. (N) TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH RECYCLE BIN. 106. (N) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL. 1:20 MAX. SLOPE, 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE. 107. (N) LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AREA. 108. NOT USED. 109. (N) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES. 110. (N) TUBE STEEL FENCE. 111. (N) TUBE STEEL ROLLING GATE. 112. (N) AC PAVING. 113. (N) CONCRETE RAMP. 114. (E) CONCRETE SIDEWALK. 115. (E) SETBACK LINE. 116. (E) GRAVEL AREA. 117. (N) BUILDING, GATES, FENCES OR WALLS WITHIN SETBACK. 118. (N) SITE WALLS THAT ARE VISIBLE TO PUBLIC STREET WILL HAVE ANTI-GRAFFITI PAINT. PER CITY FORM Z410. TYP. 119. (N) PCC PAVING. 120. (E) CAL TRANS EASEMENT. 121. (E) CITY OF ANAHEIM EASEMENT. 122. (N) PV CANOPY ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL FACILITIES 123. (N) PV CANOPY EXTENTS BY OTHERS 124. (N) R1-1 (STOP) & R3-5(R) (RIGHT TURN ONLY) SIGNS. 125. (N) KNOX BOX FOR FIRE ACCESS. 126. STRIPED TURN AROUND AREA. 127. ELECTRIC VEHICLE VAN STALL. 128. ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALL. 129. 6" CONCRETE BOLLARDS, PERMANENT. 130. PAVING AND DRIVE APRON PAVING MATERIAL, TYPICAL BOTH LOTS, ALL APRONS. SEE CIVIL DRAWING. 131. (N) DRIVEWAY APRON, SEE CIVIL DRAWING. 132. (N) LIGHT POLES. 133. HEAVY DASHED LINE INDICATES PATH OF TRAVEL. 134. PATH OF TRAVEL FROM PUBLIC ROW. 135. (N) "NO TRESPASSING 602(K) P.C." SIGN 136. (N) TOW AWAY SIGN, PURSUANT TO 22658 (a) OF THE C.V.C. AND ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4.75.090. AND R100V(CA). 137. PROPOSED REDUCED SETBACK AREA PER VARIANCE APPLICATION 138. RELOCATED "NO PARKING ANYTIME" SIGN 139. RELOCATED LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN NOTES SITE LEGEND GENERAL NOTES 1. NUMBER OF DRIVEWAYS NEEDED, DRIVEWAY SPACING AND DISTANCE TO R.O.W. CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 473. 2. DRIVEWAY DESIGN CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 115. 3. PARKING SPACE DESIGN CONFORMS TO ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 402,470,471. 4. ANY RELOCATION OF FREEWAY SIGNAGE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CALTRANS. 5. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. 11,000 7,000 SQ. FOOTAGE BUS MAINTENANCE OFFICE USE PARKING REQ'D 28 4 TOTAL: 32 TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED: 33 PARKING SUMMARY PER LETTER OF OPERATIONS PARKING STALL COUNT TOTAL FIRE HYDRANT (VERIFY LOCATION WITH CIVIL DRAWINGS) POLE MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE TRANSFORMER WITH CONCRETE PAD. (PROVIDE PROTECTION BOLLARDS PER LOCAL UTILITY OR PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS) (N) TREES EVERY 20'-0" PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STANDARDS STANDARD STALLS (8.5' X 18')11 PARALLEL STALLS (8' X 22')12 ACCESSIBLE -VAN ACCESSIBLE 2 DELIVERY AND LOADING (12' X 18')1 EV CHARGING -STANDARD 3 -VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV PROVIDED STANDARD STALLS (8.5' X 18')13 PARALLEL STALLS (8' X 22')12 ACCESSIBLE -VAN ACCESSIBLE 2 DELIVERY AND LOADING (12' X 18')1 EV CHARGING -STANDARD 3 -VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 33 SEE DETAILS 3 & 4 ON SHEET A-8.1 SEE DETAILS 5 & 6 ON SHEET A-8.1 SEE DETAILS 1 & 2 ON SHEET A-8.1 architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:45:06 PMApprover Author IRV19-0222-00ENLARGED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANA-11ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALT 10 5 6 EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYE E EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYNO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV 16"12" 24"24" S DSDSD S DE ESD UP L IN C O L N A V E N U E 114 120 121 138 139 115 134 124 125 136 101 113 106 113 TYP. 104 102102 133 127 TYP. 128 122 122122122 123 107116 120 137 109 123 100 12'-0"18'-0"TYP. 8'-6" 9'-0"24'-0"18'-0"SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"2ENLARGED ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN N JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 UP RUP 1 1 5 5 D D C C 2 2 A A 3 3 4 4 B B 182'-6" 30'-0" 7'-1"68'-2"77'-3" ALL GENDER TOILET/SHOWER 105 VESTIBULE 100 FACILITY & FLEET MANAGER 103 COPY/BREAK ROOM 102 ALL GENDER RESTROOM 106 LOCKERS 107 STORAGE 109 LOBBY 101 ASSISTANT MAINTENANCE MANAGER 104 INVENTORY CONTROL SYSTEM 113 BATTERY CHARGING 114 COMPRESSOOR ROOM 115 STS 116 ASSISTANCE MAINTENANCE MANAGER 108 JANITOR'S CLOSET 117 FIRE RISER ROOM 112 ELECTRICAL ROOM 111 3 A-41 11'-4"30'-0"25'-4"66'-8"ELEVATOR EL1 STAIR #1 ST1 STAIR #2 ST2 5 A-41 6 A-41 3 A-41 4 A-41 1 A-41 UP 26R UP 26R MAINTENANCE AREA 119 1ST2 111 112 114 115 118b 119f 119b 117 119a 103 106105 102 FR2 101100 104 118 116 109 FR2 1 1 5 5 D D C C 2 2 A A 3 3 4 4 3 A-41 B B 182'-6" 30'-0" 7'-1"68'-2"77'-3"66'-8"11'-4"30'-0"25'-4"QUIET ROOM 218 IT CLOSET 217 CONFERENCE ROOM 203 SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM 204 DK OFFICE 207 OFFICE 208 OFFICE 209 OFFICE 210 OFFICE 211 OFFICE 212 DISPATCH 213 STORAGE 202 BREAK AREA 214 MEN'S RESTROOM 215 WOMEN'S RESTROOM 216 OPEN OFFICE 219 WAITING ROOM 201 HALLWAY 200 OPEN TO BELOW ELECTRICAL ROOM 206 ELEVATOR EL1 3 A-41 4 A-41 1 A-41 STAIR #2 ST2 STAIR #1 ST1 DN 26R DN 26R 204 2ST2 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 203b 203a202 218 216 217 215 213 1HR FIRE-RESISTANCE RATED PARTITION TO 6" ABOVE CEILING FULL HEIGHT NON-RATED PARTITION TO STRUCTURE CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONCRETE WALL architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:59:35 PMC.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00FLOOR PLANS A-21ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1SECOND FLOOR PLAN SEE SHEETS A0.2 & A0.2a FOR GENERAL NOTES FLOOR PLAN 1. FOR METAL STUD SIZES AND SPACING SEE LIMITING WALL HEIGHT TABLE L/240. 2. ALL WALL STUDS TO BE 3-5/8", U.O.N. 3. ALL RESTROOM WALL STUDS TO BE 6" AND FULLY INSULATED, U.O.N. 4. SEE KEYNOTE INFORMATION FOR ANY REQUIRED INSULATION. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DOCUMENTS AND PROVIDE SAID DOCUMENTATION TO TENANT CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR OR ARCHITECT UPON COMPLETION. 6. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS (IF ANY) AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 7. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE ALL FLOOR PREPARATIONS IN BASE BID. 8. ALL DRYWALL CORNERS AND COLUMN EDGES TO BE FINISHED WITH CORNER "L" BEAD. 9. DIMENSIONS OF COLUMN FURRING IN A COMMON AREA ARE TO BE EQUAL DIMENSIONS WITH EDGE ALIGNED, U.O.N. 10. INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD WALL SHALL CONFORM TO ICC REPORT ESR-1338 GENERAL NOTES N 0 4'8'16'32' 1/8"=1'-0" WALL LEGEND DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" DCAB T.O.P. 10'-0" F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" 15234 T.O.P. 10'-0" F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" 1 5234 T.O.P. 10'-0" F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" D C AB T.O.P. 10'-0" TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: SOLARBAN R100 (2) CLEAR U FACTOR = 0.29 AND SHGC = 0.23 GLASS: VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS F.F.E. 0" 1 2 T.O.P. 10'-0" F.F.E. 0" 12 T.O.P. 10'-0" STUCCO: SHERWIN WILLIAMS -NEBULOUS WHITE SW 7063 PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW. CORRUGATED METAL: PANTONE 2925 U ACCENT COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS -SERIOUS GRAY SW 6256 COLORS: A B C architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:59:41 PMC.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-41ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4SOUTH COLORED EXTERIOR ELVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2EAST COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3WEST COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATION 0 4' 8' 16' 32' 1/8"=1'-0" MATERIALS LEGEND SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"5COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"6COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES:DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 SHERWIN WILLIAMS -NEBULOUS WHITE SW 7063 PROVIDE 6'-0" WIDE PAINT COLOR MOCK-UP FULL HEIGHT OF BUILDING FOR OWNER/ARCHITECT REVIEW. PANTONE 2925 U ACCENT COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS -SERIOUS GRAY SW 6256 COLORS: A B C TEMPERED GLASS ALL GLASS USED ON THE ENVELOPE OF THE BUILDING TO BE: SOLARBAN R100 (2) CLEAR U FACTOR = 0.29 AND SHGC = 0.23 GLASS: VISION GLASS SPANDREL GLASS F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" D C AB B C C T.O.P. 10'-0" 407 404 405 402 410 413 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" 15234 BB CA 410 402 410 T.O.P. 10'-0" 409 409 413 412 411 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" 1 5234 B CAB407 410 411 406 410 T.O.P. 10'-0" 412 402 F.F.E. 0" SECOND FLOOR 12'-0" T.O.P. 26'-0" DCAB C B 413 410 T.O.P. 10'-0" 413 F.F.E. 0" 1 T.O.P. 10'-0" F.F.E. 0" 12 413 T.O.P. 10'-0" EXTERIOR ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS. EXTERIOR SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH WITH INTEGRAL COLOR OVER MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS. MATERIALS: METAL COPING, PAINTED EXPOSED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:59:46 PMC.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-42ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802MATERIALS LEGEND SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"4SOUTH EXTERIOR ELVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"5EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"6EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES: 402 CONTINUOUS PRE-FINISHED METAL CAP. 404 ADDRESS PLACED ABOVE DOORS THAT ALLOW FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS. NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 4" HIGH WITH 1/2" STROKE. 405 BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBER, EACH CHARACTER TO BE MINIMUM 4" IN HEIGHT AND 0.5" IN WIDTH. NUMBERS TO BE INSTALLED ON A CONTRASTING BACKGROUND. 406 FUTURE TENANT SIGNAGE, UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 407 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH 1" INSULATED GLASS. 409 DRAIN LEADER, PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL. 410 PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM COMPOSITE METAL PANEL OVER CMU. 411 EXTERIOR PLASTER WITH INTEGRAL COLOR OVER CMU. 412 ALUMINUM WALL JOINT. 413 EXTERIOR WALL LIGHTING. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS. 0 4' 8' 16' 32' 1/8"=1'-0"DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 RU1 ROLL UP DOOR WIDTH HEIGHTA8.4 8 A8.4 6 A8.4 7 SD1 SECTIONAL DOOR WIDTH HEIGHTA8.4 11 A8.4 12 A8.4 13 SOLID FLUSH WIDTH F1 A8.4 14 HEIGHTSG2 STRUCTURAL GLASS HEIGHTWIDTH --- - A8.4 3 SG1 HERCULITEHEIGHTFULL HEIGHT BUTT-JOINTED GLASS EQ EQ F2 DOUBLE FLUSH WIDTH HEIGHTarchitectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:45:08 PMApprover Author IRV19-0222-00DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILSA-71ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802DOOR HARDWARE GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO THE PARTITION PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DOOR INFORMATION. 2. DOOR FRAMES TO BE ALUMINUM. 3. HOLLOW METAL DOORS TO BE PAINTED SAME COLOR AS THE ADJACENT WALL; FINISH TO BE SEMIGLOSS. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 4. PROVIDE RATED WIRE GLASS IN RATED ASSEMBLIES, U.O.N. 5. ALL HOLLOW METAL FRAMES TO BE WELDED TYPE, U.O.N. 6. RATED DOORS SHALL HAVE AUTOMATIC CLOSERS AND COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF ALL GOVERNING CODES & STANDARDS. 7. T = TEMPERED GLASS 8. ALL GLAZING SIDELIGHTS AND TRANSOMS TO RECEIVE TEMPERED GLASS SEE SHEET A0.2 FOR GENERAL DOOR NOTESSET 01 PAIR DOOR STOREFRONT 2 CONTINUOUS HINGE CFMHD1 PE 2 SURFACE VERT ROD EXIT CA 8200T MEX-US32D 628 AD 2 DOOR PULL BF156 XHD TB US10 RO 2 CONCEALED CLOSER PF91N 613 RF 2 DOOR STOP 466-RKW BLACK RO 2 SWEEP 18061CNB PE 2 ASTRAGAL 18061CNB PE 1 SEAL BY ALUM DOOR MANUF.OT SET 02 INTERIOR -FOCUS ROOM 3 HINGE, FULL MORTISE TA2314 US32D MK 1 ENTRACE LOCK CL3357 PZD ACP 606 RU 1 SURFACE CLOSER 7500HM 689 NO 1 WALL STOP RM861 RM861 RO 1 DOOR BOTTOM 420APKL PE 1 SEALS BY ALUM DOOR MANUF.OT SET 03 INTERIOR -STORAGE 3 HINGE, FULL MORTISE TA2314 US32D IVE 1 STOREFROOM LOCK CL3357 PZD ACP 626 SVH 1 SURFACE CLOSER CPS7500 TM 630 GLY 1 GASKETING S88D 630 IVE 1 DOOR BOTTOM 420APKL GRY IVE SET 04 EXTERIOR -STORAGE, MACHINE ROOM 3 HINGE, FULL MORTISE 5BB1 4.5 X 4.5 652 IVE 1 PRIVACY LOCK AS40S SAT 626 SVH 1 OH STOP 450S 630 GLY 1 KICK PLATE 1 1/2" LDW B4E 630 IVE 1 SILENCER SR64 GRY IVE SET 05 ONTERIOR -RESTROOMS 3 HINGE, FULL MORTISE 5BB1 4.5 X 4.5 652 IVE 1 PRIVAC LOCK AS40S SAT 626 SVH 1 OH STOP 450S 630 GLY 1 KICK PLATE 1 1/2" LDW B4E 630 IVE 1 SLINCER SR64 GRY IVE SET 06 EXTERIOR-EXISTING DOOR 3 EA -HING, FULL MORTISE 5BB1 4.5 X 4.5 NRP 652 IVE 1 EA -PANIC HARDWARE 98 -EO 626 VON 1 EA -SURFACE CLOSER 4040XP SCUSH TBWMS 689 LCN 1 EA -CUSH SHOE SUPPORT 4040XP-30 689 LCN 1 EA -KICK PLATE 8400 10" X 1 1/2" LDW B4E 630 IVE 1 SET -SEALS 700SA CL NGP 1 EA -DOOR SWEEP C627A CL NGP 1 EA -THRESHOLD 425HD AL NGP DOOR SCHEDULE DOOR NO.ROOM NAME DOOR FRAME FIRE RATING HDWARE NO.COMMENTSTYPE WIDTH HEIGHT THICK MATERIAL FINISH MATERIAL FINISH 1EL1 ELEVATOR EL 4'-0" 7'-0" 1ST2 STAIR #2 F1 3'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Security Hardware Required 100 VESTIBULE SG2 6'-0" 8'-0" 1/2" STRUCTURAL GLASS CLEAR FRAMELESS N/A 01 Security Hardware Required 101 LOBBY F2 6'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 01 Security Hardware Required 102 COPY/BREAK ROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 103 FACILITY & FLEET MANAGER F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 03 Card Access Hardware Required 105 ALL GENDER TOILET/SHOWER F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 05 Privacy Lock Required 106 ALL GENDER RESTROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 05 Privacy Lock Required 104 WORKSHOP F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 109 STORAGE F2 6'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 03 Security Hardware Required 111 ELECTRICAL ROOM F2 6'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 03 Security Hardware Required 112 FIRE RISER ROOM F1 3'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 20 03 Security Hardware Required 114 BATTERY CHARGING F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 03 Card Access Hardware Required 115 COMPRESSOOR ROOM F2 6'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 03 Card Access Hardware Required 116 STS WM 3'-0" 8'-0" 1/8" WIRE MESH FENCE WIRE MESH Man Gate Security Hardware Required 117 JANITOR'S CLOSET F2 6'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 03 Card Access Hardware Required 118 WORKSHOP F1 3'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED Man Gate Security Hardware Required 118a WORKSHOP RU1 8'-0" 8'-0" 2" STEEL PAINT Man Gate Security Hardware Required 118b WORKSHOP WM 6'-0" 8'-0" 1/8" WIRE MESH Man Gate Security Hardware Required 119a MAINTENANCE AREA F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 03 Security Hardware Required 119b MAINTENANCE AREA F1 3'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 20 03 Security Hardware Required 119c MAINTENANCE AREA SD1 14'-0" 15'-0" 2" STEEL PAINT Security Hardware Required 119d MAINTENANCE AREA SD1 14'-0" 15'-0" 2" STEEL PAINT Security Hardware Required to include interior locking cylinder 119e MAINTENANCE AREA SD1 14'-0" 15'-0" 2" STEEL PAINT Security Hardware Required to include interior locking cylinder 119f MAINTENANCE AREA F1 3'-0" 7'-10" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 20 03 Security Hardware Required to include interior locking cylinder 2EL1 ELEVATOR EL 4'-0" 7'-0" 202 STORAGE F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 03 Card Access Hardware Required 203b CONFERENCE ROOM FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 - By Manufacturer 203a CONFERENCE ROOM FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 - By Manufacturer 204 SMALL CONFERENCE ROOM FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED - By Manufacturer 2ST2 STAIR #2 F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 02 Card Access Hardware Required 206 ELECTRICAL ROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 45 02 Card Access Hardware Required 207 DK OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 02 Card Access Hardware Required 208 OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 209 OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 210 OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 211 OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 212 OFFICE FS1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 04 Card Access Hardware Required 213 DISPATCH F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 02 Card Access Hardware Required 215 MEN'S RESTROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 05 Privacy Lock Required 216 WOMEN'S RESTROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 05 Privacy Lock Required 217 IT CLOSET F2 6'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 90 04 Card Access Hardware Required 218 QUIET ROOM F1 3'-0" 8'-0" 1 3/4" HOLLOW METAL PAINTED HOLLOW METAL PAINTED 02 Privacy Lock Required NOTES: 1. COORDINATE DOOR HARDWARE WITH SURVEILLANCE EQUIPMENT/ VENDOR 2. WIDE ANGLE PEEPHOLE OR OTHER VIEWING DEVICE IS REQUIRED WHERE NATURAL SURVEILLANCE IS COMPROMISED DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 C L SECTION A SCALE: N.T.S. PROP. R.O.W. EX. R.O.W. 99.75' 46.75'46.75' 8.25'36.75' EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING DIRT EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EX. R.O.W. 6.25' ±2%±2% PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ±2%±2% 10.00'36.75' 93.50' PROPOSED PARKWAY 5.00'10.56' PROPOSED STREET TREE C L PROP. R.O.W. EX. R.O.W. VARIES 46.75'46.75' 8.25'36.75' EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING DIRT EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EX. R.O.W. DEDICATION (WIDTH VARIES) ±2%±2% PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ±2%±2% 10.00'36.75' 93.50' PROPOSED PARKWAY 5.21' SECTION B SCALE: N.T.S. PROPOSED STREET TREE C L PROP. R.O.W. EX. R.O.W. 85.00' 40.00'40.00' 7.75'37.25' EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING DIRT EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EX. R.O.W. 5.00' DEDICATION ±2%±2% PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ±2%±2% 2.75'37.25' 80.00' SECTION C SCALE: N.T.S. CL EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PROP. R.O.W. EX. R.O.W. 85.00' 40.00' 2.75' 45.00' 7.75'37.25'37.25' EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ±2%±2%±2%±2% SECTION D SCALE: N.T.S. CL ±2%±2%±2%±2% EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EX. R.O.W. EX. R.O.W. 90.00' 45.00' 7.75' 45.00' 7.75' 2.75' 34.50'34.50' 2.75' EXISTING AC PAVEMENT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER SECTION E SCALE: N.T.S.EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYSD D.V. NO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV SDSDSD SD SD MMMSD SANTA ANA FREEWAY S MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUE10' REARSETBACK(1.75'-3.2'LANDSCAPINGPER VARIANCE)10.0' FRONTSETBACK8.5' TYP 24.0'17.0' 12.5' 9.0' 8.0' 9.0' 24.0'W CENTER STS ADAMS ST93.5' EX ROWEX ROW PROPOSED ROW PATIO 10' REARSETBACK(0' LANDSCAPINGPERVARIANCE)EX CENTER ST ROW TO BE VACATED 23.1'66.0' 56.0' PROPOSED ROW JOINS EX ROW PROPOSED ROW JOINS EX ROW PA PA PLANTED AREA (PA)PA PA PA PA18.0'22.0' GATE 31.0'39.1'22.8'PA PA 30.4'25.6'23.3' C A L T R A N S ROW C I T Y ROW CALTRANS ROW 8.0'1.48'8.0'12.0'22.0'8.0'9.0' 12.0' FUTURE BUS WASH STATION APPROX FOOTPRINT: 2,120 SF 80.00'EX ROW85.00'PROP ROW40.00'5.00'BTW (N)PL& EX PL45.00'7.95'45.00'45.00'46.75'35.00'30.00'LOADING AREA ∆=40°19'14" R=203.25' L=143.03' S43°24'25"W 6.75' S46°35'35"E 111.71'N75°29'45"E115.12'N46°35'35"W 252.82'N46°35'35"W 218.75' ∆=2°21'40" R=170.00' L=7.01' N43°24'25"E 1.61'∆=8°05'51" R=203.25' L=28.73' ∆=17°26'03" R=170.00' L=51.73' N17°03'35"W 23.35' ∆=10°47'36" R=196.89' L=37.09' N06°16'21"W 18.69' APN 250-132-15 APN 250-132-13 (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 11,286 SF APN 250-132-10 5.00'4.80'37.14'45.00'93.50'46.75'53.00'46.75'6.25'16.70'5.00'5.28'5.00'53.00'51.62'45.00'90.00'40.00'99.75'R 1 0 . 0 0 'R10.00'R15.00 'R15.00'R15.00 'R15.00'20.00'14.00'6.00'14.00'21.00'13.00'11.00'12.00'12.00'12.00'13.00'01 02 TYP 26 03 TYP 26 208.5' WIDE 2005 04 22 27 14 06 19 25 06 23 28 28 16 03 10 TYP 090909BEGIN 09END 13BEGIN 01 2929 28 07 28 06 08 29 1413 END 12 18 18 13 09 10TYP 11 17 17 16 09 1312 15 06 2017 16 201.1' FULL HEIGHT CURB BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS 170.9' FULL HEIGHT CURB BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS 30 30 30 30 11.00' 09 ∆=1°14 '4 2 " R =8 0 4 5 .0 0 ' L =17 4.81'S75°28'02"W49.63'S40°27'01"E 429.54' N40°27'01"W 57.59' N45°59'14"W 22.54' N45°59'14"W 260.15' ∆=98°40'17" R=25.00' L=43.05' N46°11'29"W 29.53' S75°29'45"W 74.55' ∆=122°05'20" R=15.00' L=31.96'207.3' WIDE31 TYP 1 OF 3 23 32 TYP 34 33 CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG LLACRO YBFEE D GI UO Underground Service Alert of Southern California 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' WARE MALCOMB assumes no responsibility for utility locations. The utilities shown on this drawing have been plotted from the best available information. It is, however, the contractors responsibility to field verify the location of all utilities prior to the commencement of any construction. LEGEND: ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL NOTES: 1.PV CANOPIES, BATTERY, SWITCHBOARD AND TRANSFORMER BY OTHERS FOR EV CHARGING SYSTEM. THESE ELEMENTS ARE SCHEMATIC IN NATURE AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. 2.ALL EXISTING LOTS ON THE PLANS WILL BE MERGED VIA LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS 3.SEE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR ALL SIGNAGE IMPROVEMENTS.A-PARKING COUNT 90° 11 STANDARD (8.5'X18') 1 DELIVERY AND LOADING (12'X18') 3 STANDARD (8.5'X18') - EV CHARGING ONLY 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE - EV CHARGING ONLY 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE (3 CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV) PARALLEL 12 STANDARD (8'X22') TOTAL 33 STALLS C-D-B-E-PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR 135 134 (135) (134) XX.XX PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AT FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) PROPOSED SLOPE AND DIRECTION FLOW DIRECTION X.XX% 4" AC/4" AB PAVEMENT 4" AC/6" AB PAVEMENT 7" PCC/6" AB PAVEMENT CONCRETE WALKWAY/ CONCRETE V-GUTTER DETECTABLE WARNING EASEMENT LINE SITE PLAN C1.0 CONSTRUCTION NOTES STRIPED TURNAROUND AREA DOUBLE STRIPED PARKING STALL PER CITY STD 470 VERTICAL CURB VAN ACCESSIBLE EV STALL CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV STALL CONCRETE WALK RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT. SIDEWALK REPAIR PER CITY STD 113-1. ROLL UP DOOR TUBE STEEL FENCING. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-81. BOLLARD TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-81. SLIDING GATE. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-81. FREE STANDING WALL. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-81. MAN GATE. SEE DETAILS ON SHEET A-81. 66' WIDE DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD 115-B CASE 2 R=15' SIGHT TRIANGLE PER CITY STD 115-B BOTH SIDES OF DRIVEWAY REMOVE EX DRIVEWAY AND INSTALL SIDEWALK PER CITY STD 110-B 56' WIDE DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD 115-B CASE 2 R=15' 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SIGN RELOCATED PER CALTRANS STANDARDS. COORDINATION IN PROGRESS. JOIN EX WALK 24' WIDE DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD 115-B CASE 2 R=10' ACCESSIBLE STALL CURB RAMP PER CITY STD 111-3 FENCE RELOCATED PER CALTRANS STANDARDS. COORDINATION IN PROGRESS. LANDSCAPE STRIP WIDTH VARIES (3'-11' WIDE). NEW ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDEWALK 5' WIDE PER CITY STD 110-B. PV ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL FACILITIES. SEE NOTE 1. FLUSH CURB FOR LOADING AREA PROPOSED UTILITY CONNNECTIONS. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION. SIDEWALK REPAIR AS REQUIRED PER CITY STD 110-B. CONCRETE V-GUTTER PV CANOPY. SEE NOTE 1. STREET TREE PER CITY STD 530A IN LANDSCAPE STRIP. ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER BY OTHERS. ELECTRICAL SWITCH VAULT BY OTHERS. ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR BY OTHERS. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1 SDSD SD SD SD SD SANTA ANA FREEWAY S MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUEEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYD.V. NO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV W CENTER STS ADAMS S T 24.0'66.0' 56.0' CL (E) LANE STRIPING, TYP R10.0'R2.5 ' R2.5'R10.0 'R10.0'VERTICAL CURB, TYP R 1 5 . 0 'R5.0'R5.0' R15. 0' R 1 5 . 0 'R5.0 'R5 . 0 'R15.0'TRASH ENCLOSURE 18.0'22.5'EX ROW PROPOSED ROW (E) DRIVEWAY (E) DRIVEWAY (E) DRIVEWAY BUS-40 - Inter City Bus 60' ARTICULATED BUS, TYP 40' INTERCITY BUS (RED), TYP R2.5' SU-40 - Single Unit Truck PARKED 60' ARTICULATED BUS, TYP 35' STANDARD SIZED TRASH TRUCK (CYAN), TYP BUS-40 - Inter City Bus BUS-40 - Inter City Bus BUS-40 - Inter City Bus (F) BUS WASH BUILDING FUTURE BUS WASH STATION (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BUILDING 93.5' EX ROWPROPOSED ROW JOINS EX ROW C A L T R A N S ROW C I T Y ROW CALTRANS ROW 80.00'EX ROW85.00'PROP ROW40.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'46.75'93.50'46.75'53.00'46.75'53.00'51.62'45.00'90.00'40.00'99.75'20.00'14.00'6.00'14.00'21.00'13.00'11.00'12.00'12.00'12.00'13.00'37.14'45.00'40.5 6.2 23.3 4 BUS-40 - Inter City Bus Overall Length 40.500ft Overall Width 8.500ft Overall Body Height 12.000ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.158ft Track Width 8.500ft Lock-to-lock time 5.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual)41.90° 39.5 4 23 4 SU-40 - Single Unit Truck Overall Length 39.500ft Overall Width 8.000ft Overall Body Height 13.500ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.367ft Track Width 8.000ft Lock-to-lock time 5.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual)31.80° CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG LLACRO YBFEE D GI UO Underground Service Alert of Southern California 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 CIRCULATION PLAN 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' C2.0 2 SDSD SD SD SD MMM SD EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYSD D.V. NO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV SANTA ANA FREE W A Y S MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUE(1 3 9 ) ( 1 4 0 ) ( 1 3 8 ) ( 1 3 8 ) (137) (1 3 7 )(139)(138)(137) (138) (13 9 ) (138) (1 4 0 )(140)(139) PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE(6.0%)(136.7)TC (136.0)FL (136.7)TC (136.1)FL (142.8)FS (138.4±) TC=FS 0" CURB 138.8TC (138.1±)FG 9" CURB 138.0TC (137.6±)FG 6" CURB 138.0TC (137.9±)FG 0" CURB 138.0TC=FS (138.3±)FG 6" CURB (139.5±)FG 141.7FS 141.4FG (140.9±)FG (138.0)TC (137.4)FL (136.8)TC (136.2)FL (136.8)TC (136.0)FL (136.8)TC (136.1)FL (136.8)TC (135.9)FL (136.7)TC (135.8)FL (136.7)TC (136.1)FL (141.6)TC (141.9)FL (142.7)FS (139.2±)FG (139.4±)FG (139.6±)FG (140.0±)TC=FG 139.50FL 6" CURB (140.3±) TC=FG (140.0±)FG (139.6±)FS (139.3±)FS (142.3)FS (137.0)FS (139.1)FS (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BLDG FFE=138.25 PAD=137.5± (137.2)TC (136.4±)FL (136.7)FL (137.8)TC (137.0)FL (138.0)TC (137.2)FL (138.2)TC (137.3)FL (138.4)TC (137.6)FL (138.6)TC (137.8)FL SANTA ANA FREE W A Y (0.8%) 138.3TC 137.8FS 137.3FS 137.8FS 138.0FS 2.0% (139.2±)FG 138.1TC 137.6FS 2.0%1401371 3 7 137 137 13 8 138139139 137.6TC 137.1FS 137.9TC 137.4FS 138.6TC 138.1FS 138.1TC 137.6FL 138.7TC 138.2FS 136.8TG 0.9%137.7TC 137.2FS 0.8%2.5%1.2%1.0%2.6% 2.6%0.6%1.9%2.5%2.6%1.9%139.4FS 139.4FS 139.4FS 139.4FS139.0TG (F) BUS WASH BLDG 2.5%1.7%1.7%2.6%138.3FS 137.3TG 138.2FS DOOR 138.2FS DOOR 137.7FS 138.4FS138 138 1 3 8 139139 139 13 9 139 139 1 3 9 139 139 (139.7)TC=FG 138.8TG (139.4)TC=FG 138.9TG 6" CURB 139.7FS 139.7FS 140.5TC 140.0FS 139.43 139.4TG 139.4TG1.8%2.6% 1.9% 4.0%2.1% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5%1.5% 1.7%2.1%1.3%7.3%0.6%9.7%1.4% 1.8%CENTER STREETADAMS ST C I T Y R OW C A L T R A N S R OW CALTRANS ROW (0.8%) (0.8%) (4. 0 % ) (2.2%) 1 2 7 1 9 2 66 6 6 4 3 3 5 9 10 10 8 9 TYP 6TYP 2 11 6 6 6 (125) (130) (135) (130) (135) 12 CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG LLACRO YBFEE D GI UO Underground Service Alert of Southern California 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' LFGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR EXISTING 1' CONTOUR 135 134 (135) (134) XX.XX PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (AT FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) PROPOSED SLOPE AND DIRECTIONX.XX% CONSTRUCTION NOTES CURB & GUTTER INTEGRAL WITH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE FREE STANDING WALL DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD 115-B CASE 2 , R=15' DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD 115-B CASE 2, R=10' VERTICAL CURB INTEGRAL WITH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE SIDEWALK PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD 110-B TRASH ENCLOSURE SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION BMP. SEE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN VERTICAL CURB 3' WIDE V-GUTTER PROPRIETARY BIOFILTRATION PRETREATMENT BMP. SEE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN. OFFSITE BMP TO BE FINALIZED WITH FINAL WQMP. SHALLOW INFILTRATION WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT APPROVAL OR BIOFILTRATION. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 C3.0PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 3 S MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BLDG FFE=138.25 (F) BUS WASH BLDGEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYD.V. NO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV SDSD SD SD SD MMMSD PV CANOPY OVERHEAD PV CANOPY OVERHEAD SECURED BUS LOT SECURED BUS LOT SECTION A-A HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 135 140 145 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 12+00.00 12+50.00 13+00.00 13+50.00 14+00.00 14+50.00 14+75.11 146.00' PARKING LOT 5.50' WALK 182.63' (N) BUILDING SECURED BUS LOT PL 31.45' PLANTED AREA EG FG SECTION B-B HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+00.00 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 12+00.00 12+50.00 13+00.00 13+50.00 14+00.00 14+50.00 15+00.00 15+50.00 16+00.00 16+50.00 17+00.0017+12.50 24.00' ENTRY DRIVE 5.50' WALK 182.63' (N) BUILDING 437.83' SECURED BUS LOT 91.33' (F) BUS WASH BLDG 7.96' PLANTED AREA FREE STANDING WALL @ PL EG FG SECTION C-C HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+00.00 10+50.0010+62.50 (N) PL 20.66' PLANTED AREA PARKING LOT EG FG SECTION D-D HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 11+75.00 (N) PL 90.98' PARKING LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL 20.70' PV CANOPY EG FG SECTION E-E HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 PL 81.23' SECURED BUS LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL EGFG SECTION F-F HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+25.00 PL 53.16' SECURED BUS LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL EGFG CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG LLACRO YBFEE D GI UO Underground Service Alert of Southern California 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' D E F CA B C3.1GRADING SECTIONS 4 S MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BLDG FFE=138.25 (F) BUS WASH BLDGEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYD.V. NO PARKING SDSD SD SD SD MMMSD PV CANOPY OVERHEAD PV CANOPY OVERHEAD SECURED BUS LOT SECURED BUS LOT SECTION A-A HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 135 140 145 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 12+00.00 12+50.00 13+00.00 13+50.00 14+00.00 14+50.00 14+75.11 146.00' PARKING LOT 5.50' WALK 182.63' (N) BUILDING SECURED BUS LOT PL 31.45' PLANTED AREA EG FG SECTION B-B HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+00.00 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 12+00.00 12+50.00 13+00.00 13+50.00 14+00.00 14+50.00 15+00.00 15+50.00 16+00.00 16+50.00 17+00.0017+12.50 24.00' ENTRY DRIVE 5.50' WALK 182.63' (N) BUILDING 437.83' SECURED BUS LOT 91.33' (F) BUS WASH BLDG 7.96' PLANTED AREA FREE STANDING WALL @ PL EG FG SECTION C-C HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+00.00 10+50.0010+62.50 (N) PL 20.66' PLANTED AREA PARKING LOT EG FG SECTION D-D HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 11+75.00 (N) PL 90.98' PARKING LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL 20.70' PV CANOPY EG FG SECTION E-E HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+50.00 PL 81.23' SECURED BUS LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL EGFG SECTION F-F HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1"=30' VERTICAL EXAGGERATION: 4X 135 140 145 150 135 140 145 150 10+50.00 11+00.00 11+25.00 PL 53.16' SECURED BUS LOT TUBE STEEL FENCE @ PL PL EGFG CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG LLACRO YBFEE D GI UO Underground Service Alert of Southern California 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' D E F CA B C3.1GRADING SECTIONS 4 SDSD SD SD SD SD EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYSD D.V. NO PARKING CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/ EV SANTA ANA FREE W A Y S. MANCHESTER AVENUELINCOLN AVENUEPROPOSED PROPERTY LINE (N) ADMIN & WORKSHOP BLDG FFE=138.25 SANTA ANA FREE W A Y (F) BUS WASH BLDG CENTER STREETADAMS ST C I T Y R OW C A L T R A N S R OW CALTRANS ROW 6"FW 4"DW 6"FW 4"DW (E) 4"W (E) 4"W CAPPED PER CITY OF ANAHEIM WATER MAP 63 4"SS 3"DW TYP STUB 3"DW TYP CLOSED TOP 6"SD 12"SD 4"SD 4"SD 4"SD 6"SD 6"SD 8"SD 8"SD 8"SD 6"SD 6"SD 8"SD 6"SD (E) FH PROPOSED WATER EASEMENT PV CANOPY OVERHEAD 15"SD 15"SD6"SD 4"SS 6"SS 12"SD (E) 12"W (E) 8"W (E) 6"W (E) 6"W (E) 8"W PV CANOPY OVERHEAD 10' FRONT SETBACK 10' CLR(N) TREE, TYP 5'CLR 10'CLR10'CLR 10'CL R IRR POCPV CANOPY COLUMN, TYP 4 4 12 8 12 7 4 4 14 19 3 14 16 18 14 17 5 10 11 15 20 20 20 1 18 13 4 4 4 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 9 13 13 13 2 2 13 18 21 22 23 CITY OF ANAHEIM 10 EDELMAN IRVINE, CA 92618 5 1 NR 08/04/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 2 NR 10/12/21 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 3 NR 02/07/22 DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL 02 / 07 / 2022 0 SCALE: 1" = 15 30 60 30' LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED SEWER EXISTING SEWER PROPOSED FIRE WATER (N) STORM DRAIN PIPE. SIZE PER PLAN. (N) CATCH BASIN. (N) 3' WIDE PARKWAY DRAIN PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD PLAN 151-1. (N) PROPRIETARY BIOFILTRATION VAULT (PRETREATMENT). BIOCLEAN MODULAR WETLANDS MWS-L-4-8 OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. (N) 11,368 CF SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION BMP. STORMTRAP SINGLETRAP BOTTOMLESS PRECAST TANK ON BED OF ROCK OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. (N) STORM DRAIN NYLOPOLAST RISER OR PRECAST MANHOLE. (N) DIVERSION VALVE TO DIRECT FLOWS TO STORM DRAIN DURING RAIN EVENTS. (N) TRENCH DRAIN. (N) ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR BY OTHERS. (N) ELECTRICAL SWITCH VAULT BY OTHERS. (N) ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER BY OTHERS. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 C4.0PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES (N) 6" SEWER LATERAL. CONNECT TO (E) SSMH. (N) SEWER PIPE. SIZE PER PLAN. (N) OIL-WATER SEPARATOR. BUILDING POINT OF CONNECTION (N) 4" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE. (N) ABOVE GROUND COMPOUND METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-207 & W-229. NOT USED. (N) ABOVE GROUND 6" DOUBLE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-220. (N) 6" FIRE WATER SERVICE PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-201. (N) PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-110. (N) 2" IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-102. (N) ABOVE GROUND 2" REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPAL BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD W-104. (N) WATER PIPE. SIZE PER PLAN. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER PROPOSED IRRIGATION WATER EXISTING WATER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING OIL LINE REMOVE EXISTING UTILITY UTILITY NOTES: THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CLEARANCES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER MAIN AND OTHER FACILITIES: 1.10 FEET MINIMUM FROM STRUCTURES, FOOTINGS, WALLS, STORMWATER BMPS, POWER POLES, STREET LIGHTS AND TREES. 2.5 FEET MINIMUM FROM BCR/ECR OF CURB RETURNS AND ALL OTHER UTILITIES OR ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES. 3.10 FEET MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION (OUTSIDE WALL TO OUTSIDE WALL) FROM SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND LATERALS. 4.6 FEET MINIMUM SEPARATION FROM CURB FACE 5.1 FOOT MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION FROM OTHER UTILITIES. 5 93/4" Varies With Height Base Material Uniform Zinc Coating (Hot Dip) Zinc Phosphate Coating Epoxy Primer INDUSTRIAL FLAT MOUNT BRACKET Acrylic Topcoat Bracket Options MONTAGE II RAIL Specially formed high strength architectural shape. TM PROFUSION WELDING PROCESS No exposed welds, Good Neighbor profile - Same appearance on both sides TM E-COAT COATING SYSTEM BX301BX304 INDUSTRIAL SWIVEL BRACKET NOTES: 1.) Post size depends on fence height and wind loads. See MONTAGE II specifications for post sizing chart and setting dimensions. 2.) Third & Forth rail optional. 3.) Available in Flush Bottom. TM 13/4"MONTAGE II Rail (See Cross- Section Below) TM Post size varies with Height (See MONTAGE II Post-Sizing chart)TM 1 1" 14ga Picket 8' O.C. Nom. Varies With Height 2" Nom. Standard Heights 7', 8' 1" 2 3 2 36" Min. Footing Depth TYPICAL33/4" 13/4" 13/4" MONTAGE II RAILTM 20" 10 1 Values shown are nominal and not to be used for installation purposes. See product specification for installation requirements. 93/4" Varies with Height 33/4" TYPICAL 13/4"MONTAGE II Rail (See Cross- Section on Panel Drawing) TM 1" SQ Picket 1 Gate Upright 2" SQ Weld on Box Hinge 3 1" 4 Varies with Height Standard Heights 7', 8' 36" Min. Footing depth 23" (Latch Clearance)Ameristar Standard Leaf Widths 2" (Hinge Clearance) Single Gate Arrangement Post size varies with Height (See MONTAGE II Post-Sizing chart)TM NOTES: 1.) Post size depends on fence height, weight and wind loads. See MONTAGE II specifications for post sizing chart. 2.) See Ameristar gate table for standard out to outs. Custom gate openings available for special out to out/leaf widths.3.) Additional styles of gate hardware are available on request This could change the Latch & Hinge Clearance. 4.) Third & Forth rail optional. TM 2" Nom. 4 13/4"FORERUNNER RailTM 20" 10 4"6'-0" +4' - 0" +4"NOTE: ALL GATE & FRAME SURFACES TO HAVE PAINTED FINISH. 2" X 2" X 3/16" ANGLE FRAME TS 2 X 2 X .120 GATE BACK SUPPORT 1/2" DIA. HORIZONTAL CANE BOLT GATE LOCK 22 GA. GALV. STEEL DECK PROFILE "B" W/ 4" RIB SPACING 1/2" DIA. VERTICAL CANE BOLT WITH STEEL SLEEVE AT SLAB PLACED ON BACK OF GATES 4". STEEL ANGLE, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. CONCRETE WALL SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PAINT WALLS TO MATCH BUILDING FIELD COLOR, TYP. MONOLITHIC POUR CONCRETE CURB FINISH SURFACE, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. CONCRETE FOOTING, SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.4"6"6" EXTERIOR GUIDE WHEEL & BRACKET HEAVY DUTY STEEL "V" GROOVE WHEELS, TYP. @ EA. END AND MIDDLE OF GATE INTERIOR SLOPE CONC. MIN. 1/4" PER FOOT TO DRIVE AISLE CONC. CURB/FTG. SEE CIVIL. WROUGHT IRON GATE STATIONARY FENCE -SEE OTHER DETAILS 6"1'-0"6"6"PER CIVIL6'-0"4"1 -#4 CONTINOUS AT EACH CORNER 3 A-81 2" X 2" X 1/4" STEEL CONT. W/ 5/8"Ø X 6" LONG STUD ANCHOR @ 24" O.C. CONC. FOOTING WROUGHT IRON GATE, SEE GATE WHEEL ASSEMBLY NOTE: PROVIDE WEEP HOLES IN STEEL ANGLE FOR SITE WATER DRAINAGE. 1'-6".1".2'-0".6".1 -#4 CONTINOUS AT EACH CORNER DESIGN CRITERIA: MATERIALS DESIGN DATA: REINFORCING STEEL ...................................................................... fy = 60 KSI (40CI MPa) CONCRETE 28TH—DAY STRENGTH: FOOTING ..................................................................................... f 'c = 2,500 P51 (17 MRa) CONCRETE MASONRY: PARTIALLY GROUTED ............................................................... f 'm = 1,500 PSI (10 MPa) DESIGN CODE:................................................................................. GOVERNING BUILDING CODE DESIGN METHOD: CONCRETE ....................................................................................... ULTIMATE STRENGTH METHQD CONCRETE MASQNRY .................................................................... WORKING STRESS METHOD FOUNDATION: ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING PRESSURE ...................................... 1,000 PSF (48 kPa) ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL BEARING PRESSURE ..................... 100 PSF / FT 0~ DEPTH (157 kPa / m OF QEPTH) LATERAL SENDING RESISTANCE AT CONTACT AREA ..................... 130 PSF (6.2 kPa) BUT NOT TO EXCEED 0.40 X DL SOIL DENSITY ...................................................... 110 PCF (1760 k9~m"3) FACTORS OF SAFETY FOR SPREAD FOOTING (BASED ON SERVICE LOAD CONDITIONS): OVERTURNING .............................................................................. 1..75 MINIMUM SLIDING............................................................................................ L5 MINIMUM ONE THIRD INCREASE IS ALLOWED FOR SHORT TERM LOADS GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONSULT WITH LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY FOR DETERMINATION OF LATERAL LOAD AND WALL TYPE LISTED IN TABLES, FOR PROJECT—SPECIFIC USE. 2. DISTANCE OF THE SOOTING FROM DESCENDING SLOPE SHALL BE PER LATEST GOVERNING BUILDING CODE OR PER AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. 3. SPECIAL INSRECTION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR WALLS. 4. GROUND LINE TO BE AT THE SAME ELEVATION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE WALL. WALL SHALL NOT BE USED TO RETAIN EARTH. 5, USE TABULAR INFORMATION FOR THE NEXT HIGHER H FOR INTERMEDIATE WALL HEIGHTS THAT ARE BETWEEN THE H'S GIVEN. 6. CONCRETE SHALL B~ 500—G-2500 (295—C-17) PER SSPWC 201-1.1.2. 7. REINFORCING SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM 48 BAR DIA. GRADE 60 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE PER SSPWC SECTION 209-2, 3Q3-4.1.3, JOINT REINFORCING WIRE: ASTM A82. 8. ALL REINFORCED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WfTH SSPWC 303. 9. FOR TYPE OF BLOCKS, BOND PATTERN AND JOINT FINISH, SEE PROJECT PLANS. 1d. ALL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH. SSPWC 303-4. 11. 'HOLLOW MASONRY UNITS...ASTM G-90. TYPE I. NORMAL WEIGHT UNITS. MORTAR ...1:1/ 2.3, PORTLAND CEMENT —LIME —SAND RATIO, 1800 PSI (13 MPa) PER SSPWC 202-2.2.1 GROUT ......1:3:2 PORTLAND CEMENT —SAND —`PEA GRAVEL RATIO, 2,000 PSI. (14 MPa) PER SSPWG 202-2.2.2. 12. PROVIDE FULL MORTAR BED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FIRST COURSE AND OMIT MORTAR BETWEEN VERTICAL JOINTS OF LOWEST EXPOSED COURSE. 13. WHEN BLOCKS ARE LAID IN STACKED BOND, CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL JOINT REINFORCEMENT SPACED AT 4'-0° (1200 mm) QC SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE BOND BEAM REINFORCEMENT RER SSPWC 303-4.1.2., LOCATE REINFORCEMENT IN JOINTS THAT ARE APPROXIMATE MIDPOINT BETWEEN BOND BEAMS. 14. BOND BEAMS SHALL BE PLACED AT TOP OF WALL AND SUBSEQUENTLY SPACED NOT TO EXCEED 4'-0" (1200 mm) O.C., BELOW 15. ONLY CELLS IMTH REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GROUTED PER SSPWC 303-4.1.3. 16. HORIZONTAL JOINTS SHALL BE TOOLED CONCAVE OR WEATHERED. VERTICAL JOIN7S SHALL BE TOOLED CONCAVE OR RAKED. WEATHERED AND RAKED JOINTS ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR SLUMPED BLOCKS.architectureplanninginteriorsgraphicscivil engineering10 EdelmanIrvine, CA 92618P 949.660.9128F 949.863.1581JOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM: SHEET THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKCAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT C:\_Revit\0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER_hbelloKZV4V.rvt2/16/2022 7:45:09 PMApprover Author IRV19-0222-00DETAILS A-81ATN -MANCHESTER100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUEANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"5TRASH ENCLOSURE GATE SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"4TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"3ROLLING GATE SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"1SLIDING GATE TRACK SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"10TUBE STEEL FENCE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/8" = 1'-0"6TUBE STEEL GATE ELEVATION N.T.S.13 DESIGN CRITERIA - FOR REFERENCE ONLY SCALE: 12" = 1'-0"7REINFORCEMENT DETAILS - FOR REFERENCE ONLY N.T.S.15 GEN. NOTES - FOR REFERENCE ONLY DATEREMARKS02/17/2021PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALJOB NO.: DRAWN BY.: PA/PM:C.ADAMS H.A. IRV19-0222-00DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE RESUBMITTAL06/30/2023 E-1.0ELECTRICAL SYMBOL LIST, LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE, DETAILS & NOTES LIGHTING FIXTURE NOTESIMPORTANT BID NOTEDEMOLITION NOTESMANUFACTURERDESCRIPTIONVOLTSLAMPSLIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULETYPETITLE 24 ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION NOTEGENERAL ELECTRICAL NOTESTITLE 24 GENERAL NOTEELECTRICAL SYMBOL LISTBIM 360://IRV19-0222-00_Uprite ATN Claudina Anaheim/0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER.rvt --IRV19-0222-00ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802 DATE REMARKS architecture planning interiors graphics civil engineering 10 Edelman Irvine, CA 92618 P 949.660.9128 F 949.863.1581JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY1056 12EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY EVCHARGINGONLY SDD.V.NOPARKINGCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVTYP.EVCHA R GI N G ONLY EVCHA R GI N G ONL Y EV CHAR GI N G ONLY EV CHA R GI N G ONLY 105610711813611810510311112104100SDSDSDSDSDSDEVCHA R GI N G ONLY EVCHA R GI N G ONL Y EV CHAR GI N G ONLY EV CHA R GI N G ONLY SDD.V.NOPARKINGCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EV:$:$:$:$:$:$:$:$6$6$6$6$:$:$6$:$:$:$:$E-2.2ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING AND SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS BIM 360://IRV19-0222-00_Uprite ATN Claudina Anaheim/0222_ARCH_MANCHESTER.rvt --IRV19-0222-00ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802 DATE REMARKS architecture planning interiors graphics civil engineering 10 Edelman Irvine, CA 92618 P 949.660.9128 F 949.863.1581JOB NO.:DRAWN BY.:PA/PM:SHEETTHESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF WARE MALCOMB AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH WARE MALCOMB. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF WARE MALCOMB PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK CAUTION:IF THIS SHEET IS NOT 30"x42" IT IS A REDUCED PRINTPOLE BASE DETAILBSITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN1SITE LIGHTING PLAN1 MANCHESTER AVEMANCHESTER AVEADMIN ANDFUTURE BUS WASH STATIONWORKSHOP BUILDINGPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINELIMIT OF WORKPROPERTY LINELIMIT OF WORKPROPERTY LINELIMIT OF WORKSDSD SDSD SD SDEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLY SDSDNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVCLEAN AIR/VANPOOL/EVS. ADAMS STREETW. CENTER S T R E E T LINCOLN AVESANTA ANA FREEWAY5(CALTRANS RIGHT-OF-WAY)NOT A PART10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACK10' SETBACKPROPOSED STREET TREE TO BESELECTED BY CITY OF ANAHEIMPUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPE GROUPDURING FINAL DESIGN AND PERMITTING.PROPERTY LINEINDICATES SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION (2 TOTAL) - REFER TO PLANTINGNOTES, ITEM 'H', SHEET L6.1 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONSYMBOL DESCRIPTIONNOTES:1. ON-CENTER SPACINGS NOTED ON THE PLANT LEGEND TAKE PRECEDENCE OVERPLANT COUNTS OR SYMBOLS SHOWN ON THE DRAWING.2. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL SPECIFICATIONS TOLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AT LEAST FOURTEEN (14)DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SOIL PREPARATION OR PLANT MATERIALS.3. SOIL PREPARATION AND BACKFILL AMENDMENTS PER SPECIFICATION ASRECOMMENDED BY AGRONOMIC SOIL TEST REPORT.4. PROVIDE LINEAR ROOT BARRIERS TO ALL TREES WITHIN 3'-0" OF HARDSCAPE.5. APPLY 3" DEEP LAYER OF APPROVED MULCH TO ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVERAREAS. BARK MULCH SHALL NOT BE APPLIED TO BIOSWALE AREAS.SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE PROPOSED TREESPRELIMINARY PLANTING LEGENDTRISTANIA CONFERTA /BRISBANE BOX24" BOXSTANDARDMUHLENBERGIA RIGENS /DEER GRASS1 GAL /36" O.C.SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE PROPOSED SHRUBSLEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS /TEXAS RANGER5 GAL /36" O.C.ALYOGYNE HUEGELII /BLUE HIBISCUS5 GAL /42" O.C.HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA /RED YUCCA1 GAL /30" O.C.ELAEAGNUS P. 'FRUITLANDII' /FRUITLAND SILVERBERRY5 GAL /36" O.C.DIETES VEGETA /FORTNIGHT LILY5 GAL /36" O.C.CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' /DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH1 GAL /30" O.C.CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS /WESTERN REDBUD24" BOXSTANDARDROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS' /PROSTRATE ROSEMARY1 GAL /36" O.C.CEANOTHUS 'YANKEE POINT' /YANKEE POINT WILD LILAC1 GAL /42" O.C.MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM /MYOPORUM1 GAL /36" O.C.PROPOSED GROUNDCOVERCISTUS PURPUREUS /ORCHID ROCKROSE5 GAL /42" O.C.SALVIA GREGII 'FURHMAN'S RED' /FURHMANS RED SAGE1 GAL /36" O.C.PROPOSED STREET TREE TO BESELECTED BY CITY OF ANAHEIM15 GALLONSTANDARDPUBLIC WORKSCITY OF ANAHEIM 11CN08/04/21DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL1(Date)(Signature)Lic. #5439Colleen M. Nolan02.09.2022Colleen M. NolanLandscape Architect, #543913355 Silverado CourtCorona, CA 92883714.743.7915 cellcnolan@cox.net10/12/21DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL2CN02/09/22DEVELOPMENT PLAN RESUBMITTAL3CNPRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLANL1.1SCALE: 1"=30'-0"0306090 SD S D SD SD SD EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYSDD.V.EV+PV+BESS SYSTEM SITE PLAN1-SCALE: 1"= 30'-0"1234BC56DE1"12"0ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36"SHEET SIZE ARCH "D"REVISION DATENO.INIT.ASHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPROJECT #221128BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92802 BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773PRELIMINARY EQUIPMENT SCHEDULEQTYEQUIPMENTPART #DESCRIPTION280 KW AC CHARGERBYD EVA080KS/012200KW AC CHARGERBYD EVA0200KS/0118L2 CHARGER250 KW PV INVERTERCPS SCA50KTL-DO/US-480160 KW PV INVERTERCPS SCA60KTL-DO/US-4801150 KVA 372 KWH BESSSOCOMEC SUNSYS HES LPROPOSEDSITE PLANG-100.0 EVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYPV ARRAY AND EQUIPMENT DETAIL1-SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1234BC56DE1"12"0ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36"SHEET SIZE ARCH "D"REVISION DATENO.INIT.ASHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPROJECT #221128BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92802 BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773PRELIMINARYPV ARRAY ANDEQUIPMENTDETAILG-100.1 SD SD SD SD N MANCHESTER BOULEVARDSANTA ANA FREEWAYLINCOLN AVENUESD W CEN TER S TREE T S ADAMS STREETEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYEVCHARGINGONLYSDD.V.LIGHTING SITE PLAN1-SCALE: 1"= 20'-0"LIGHTINGPLANE-5.01234BC56DE1"12"0ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36"SHEET SIZE ARCH "D"REVISION DATENO.INIT.ASHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPROJECT #221128BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92802 BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773PRELIMINARYGENERAL NOTES KEYED NOTES:#LIGHTING FIXTURE INSTALLATION 2E-5.0NTSLEGENDV##V8 "T" PV CANOPY UNDER CANOPY LED LIGHT1-1/2" = 1'-0"1234BC56DE1"12"0ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36"SHEET SIZE ARCH "D"REVISION DATENO.INIT.ASHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPROJECT #221128BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773ATN - MANCHESTER 100 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92802 BLYMYERENGINEERS1101 MARINA VILLAGE PARKWAY # 100ALAMEDA, CA 94501 510.521.3773PRELIMINARYELECTRICALDETAILSE-7.0"L" PV CANOPY UNDER CANOPY LED LIGHT2-1/2" = 1'-0""L" PV CANOPY UNDER CANOPY LED LIGHT3-1/2" = 1'-0" ANAHEIM TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 1354 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim CA 92805 tel (714) 563-5287 April 22, 2021 City of Anaheim Planning Department Arlette Kim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Letter of Request – Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility at 100 S. Manchester Avenue The Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) is building a new maintenance and operation facility in Anaheim, California, which will become the base of operations for ATN and will house operations, staff, maintenance and storage facilities for 82 buses, and electric bus charging infrastructure. ATN was not able to acquire a parcel large enough to house their operations and maintenance buildings and store the full fleet of buses, so the new facilities will be constructed on two separate properties, located at 1227 Claudina Street (Claudina site), and at 100 South Manchester Avenue (Manchester site). The Manchester site is significantly constrained due to its odd shape and extremely narrow depth. At the widest point, the site is approximately 93 feet deep, but less than a quarter of the site measures 93 feet. The site narrows to the south down to 45 feet near the south access driveway. With a 10-foot front setback and a 10-foot rear setback, the usable portion of the site is less than 19 feet wide in these segments. The following zoning code variances are required to provide a usable site: Variance for Standard Detail 115-B, Arterial Highway and Commercial Driveway Approach Variance for Section 18.08.060.0308 regarding Parking within Landscape Setback Areas Variance for Manchester Avenue to maintain the Existing Curb-to-Curb Width Existing Conditions ATN is a public transportation services provider located in the City of Anaheim, California. ATN is governed by the Board of Directors and is the primary policy making body for the provision of public transit services in the greater Anaheim Resort, Platinum Triangle and other areas of Anaheim. ATN provides a comprehensive public transit service, known as the Anaheim Resort Transportation (ART) in the greater Anaheim Resort area, including cities of Anaheim, Orange and Garden Grove, Buena Park and Costa Mesa. ART service connects seventy-two (72) area hospitality establishments with local destinations and attractions including Disneyland® Resort, Disney® California Adventure, Downtown Disney®, Anaheim Convention Center, Anaheim ATTACHMENT 3 Anaheim Transportation Network Letter of Operations – 100 S. Manchester Avenue Error! Reference source not found. 2 GardenWalk, Angel Stadium & ARTIC Station, the Outlets at Orange, Christ’s Cathedral, the Honda Center, Buena Park Destinations and Center City Anaheim. ATN employs 189 people, including 140 drivers, 36 administration and management professionals, and 13 maintenance staff. The new bus operation and maintenance facilities are being designed based on these staff levels. ATN currently operates out of 1354 South Anaheim Boulevard in Anaheim, California with a fleet of about 81 buses. The Manchester site covers approximately 1.29 acres bounded by Manchester Avenue to the west, Lincoln Avenue to the north, the Interstate 5 (I-5) freeway to the east and industrial land use to the south. Future Conditions ATN has purchased 40 electric buses that will be delivered in December 2020. ATN will need electric charging infrastructure installed by the delivery date in order to operate the electric buses. By 2022, ATN expects to retire all of its non-electric buses and to operate with an all- electric fleet. The types and quantities of battery electric buses are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Future Bus Fleet Phase Model No. Length (ft) Bus Quantity Charger Capacity (kw) Charger Quantity Note 1 K7 30 12 80 12 2 to be delivered Dec. 2019 1 K9 40 24 80 24 1 K11 60 10 200 10 4 on site, 20 ordered for 2020 delivery. 2 TBD 35 10 TBD TBD 2 TBD 40 25 TBD TBD 2 TBD 60 5 TBD TBD Note: All battery electric buses to be delivered December 2020 unless otherwise noted. The property at 100 South Manchester Avenue (the Manchester site) will be used for bus maintenance, bus wash, fleet preparation and administrative staff use. The operations and maintenance building will have a footprint of 11,000 square feet, and include a bus maintenance facility on the ground floor. The second floor will include 7,000 square feet of space for ATN administrative staff use. The site will include 21 parking spaces (including 2 accessible spaces with a shared 96-inch wide access aisle, 2 parking spaces with a shared 96-inch wide access aisle that are reserved for electric vehicles, and two additional parking spaces reserved for electric vehicles) in a general use surface parking lot located on the north side of the building. There will be 12 parking spaces for ATN’s maintenance staff and employee use only on the south side of the building, for a total parking supply of 33 spaces. Anaheim Transportation Network Letter of Operations – 100 S. Manchester Avenue Error! Reference source not found. 3 Table 2. Parking Space Inventory - Manchester Site Parking Spaces (General) 21 ADA – Van (included in General Space Count) 2 EV Charging (included in General Space Count) 4 Parking Spaces (Employee Access Only) 12 Parking Spaces (TOTAL) 33 Land Use Designation The zoning for this property is General Commercial, but the proposed use will be Public Services. The bus operations and maintenance site will not operate as a transit facility. There are no boardings that occur on-site and the operation is strictly for the administration and maintenance of ATN’s bus fleet. Operations The majority of the administrative and management activity will occur at the Manchester site. At least one person will be on site between 6:00 AM and 10:00 PM, with up to 28 administrative staff and 4 maintenance staff on site between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Drivers are not expected to visit the Manchester site as part of typical operations. Bus Maintenance Bus maintenance will occur at the Manchester site. Maintenance staff will travel from the Manchester site to the Claudina site and drive buses to and from the Manchester site for service. Fleet preparation and routine upkeep activities are expected to occur 7 days a week between the hours of 10:00 PM and 4:30 AM. Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual does not include a land use category for bus maintenance and operations facility. Based on current and planned future operations, the expected daily and peak hour trip generation is summarized in Table 3. Note that daily bus traffic to the Manchester site is only expected after the future bus wash is installed, and the bus wash activity will occur outside of peak hours of adjacent street traffic. Each bus will be washed about once per week. Bus traffic to and from the site for maintenance and repairs will be negligible. Anaheim Transportation Network Letter of Operations – 100 S. Manchester Avenue Error! Reference source not found. 4 Table 3. Trip Generation - Manchester Site Vehicle Type Daily AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Admin Staff 34 34 68 7 1 8 1 7 8 Maintenance Staff 6 6 12 1 1 2 0 0 0 Buses 10 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 50 50 100 8 2 10 7 7 8 Table 4 includes the ITE (10th Edition) Trip Generation rates and the calculation for Admin Staff in Table 3. Table 4. ITE (10th Edition) Trip Generation for General Office Building (ITE Code 710) Size (TSF) Daily AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Rates 4.87 4.87 9.74 1.00 0.16 1.16 0.18 0.97 1.15 7.0 34 34 68 7 1 8 1 7 8 Parking Demand Table 7 summarizes the non-residential parking requirements for the Manchester site. The proposed operations and maintenance building will include 11,000 square feet of space on the ground level for bus maintenance, and 7,000 square feet of space on the second level for administrative staff use. There are no use classes listed in Table 42-A Non-Residential Parking Requirements in Section 18.42.040 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code that are applicable to bus maintenance for a transit fleet. There will be no general public access to the bus maintenance facility, and it will be used by ATN employees only. The parking demand for the bus maintenance portion of the building is based on the number of maintenance employees that will be on site by time of day. For the second level use, rates from Table 42-A for the Office- General use class were used. Table 5. Off-Street Parking Requirements Use Class Size Parking Requirement Required Spaces Bus Maintenance 11.3 TSF 4 Office – General 3 stories or lower 7.0 TSF 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA 28 TOTAL SPACES 32 Notes:  Requirements from Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.42.040  TSF – thousand square feet  GFA – gross floor area Anaheim Transportation Network Letter of Operations – 100 S. Manchester Avenue Error! Reference source not found. 5 Based on expected uses and code requirements, the off street parking space requirement for the Manchester site is 32 spaces. However, based on activity at the existing facility, parking demand at the Manchester site is not expected to exceed 20 spaces on a typical day. Site Circulation The proposed civil site plan is shown in Exhibit 1 and includes three driveways on Manchester Avenue. The north driveway (Driveway 1) is 24 feet wide and serves the off-street surface parking lot. This driveway will be limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only, and will be used by administrative employees and for deliveries. There are two driveways proposed on the south side of the maintenance building. The center driveway (Driveway 2) is 56 feet wide and is located just south of the maintenance building. The south driveway (Driveway 3) will be located near the south end of the site and will be 66 feet wide. A future bus wash facility will be installed between Driveway 2 and 3. Bus vehicles will enter the site from Driveway 3 to access the bus wash facility or the maintenance bays, which will be located on the south side of the building. Buses will drive forward into the maintenance bays, and back out of the bays. Driveway 2 and 3 will be limited to right-turn movements due to the existing raised median on Manchester Avenue. Wider driveways are needed for both the center and south access points because the site is narrow and there is limited space for circulation. Access Control The area on the north side of the building will be open to the public. The driveway that serves the surface parking lot will not be gate controlled or fenced. The two driveways on the south side of the maintenance building lead to secure areas, and will be controlled by rolling gates. A man gate will provide controlled pedestrian access from Manchester Avenue. Bus Access Bus vehicles will enter the site from Driveway 3, a 66-foot wide driveway on Manchester Avenue located at the south end of the site. The gate across this driveway will remain closed and will open automatically when it senses an approaching ATN bus, which will be equipped with transponder equipment. ATN plans to install transponder tags equipped with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) on the buses so they will be detected automatically, and the gate will open without action required by the bus driver. If more than one bus approaches the gate, the gate will remain open until all buses within range have entered the driveway. Only ATN authorized vehicles and sanitation trucks will be permitted to enter the secure portion of the site south of the maintenance building via Driveway 3. Bus vehicles will exit the site from Driveway 2, the 56-foot wide driveway on Manchester Avenue located near the center of the site, just south of the maintenance building. Pedestrian Access A man gate will be located on Manchester Avenue just south of the maintenance building. This gate will remain locked 24 hours a day, and will be for staff use only. A second man gate will be located near the northwest corner of the building, and will also be locked 24 hours a day to provide a secure perimeter around the bus maintenance area. Anaheim Transportation Network Letter of Operations – 100 S. Manchester Avenue Error! Reference source not found. 7 Public access to the administrative portion of the building will be available through the building lobby. Guests will be screened by ATN staff before being allowed to pass into the secure portion of the building. Electrical Service and Charging One 220-volt charger and one 80-volt charger will be installed at the Manchester site in Phase 1. These chargers will be available for the buses that are receiving maintenance or repair service. Regular bus charging will occur at ATN’s facility at 1227 S. Claudina Street. In Phase 2, there will be four (4) Level 2 chargers for staff and ATN support vehicle use at the Manchester site. Solid Waste Management and Recycling A Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP) has been submitted to Public Works Department for review and approval. The trash enclosure will be 8 feet wide (inside clearance) and 20 feet long, and designed to City of Anaheim standards. Sanitation trucks will enter the site via Driveway 3 to access the trash enclosure, and exit via Driveway 2. The design team has coordinated with the City of Anaheim sanitation contract specialist to identify the location of the trash enclosure. The sanitation truck path through the site is shown in Exhibit 2, and meets the required 37-foot turning radius to accommodate a 35-foot long truck. The truck path does not pass under any structures, so the 14’-6” vertical clearance requirement is met. The truck can pull right next to the enclosure, so the bin will not need to be rolled out more than 25 feet. ATTACHMENT 4 ANAHEIM TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 1354 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim CA 92805 tel (714) 563-5287 October 1, 2021 City of Anaheim Planning Department Arlette Kim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Variance Justification – Off-street Parking Requirement Section 18.42.040 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code provides off-street parking requirements for non-residential uses. The requirements are determined by the type of use or use class. ATN’s bus operations and maintenance facility does not fall neatly into any of the categories listed in Table 42-A. The land use for the site is categorized as Public Services, however, the requirement of 4 parking spaces per 1,000 feet of gross floor area for buildings of 3 stories or lower does not provide an appropriate space requirement for the intended use. This letter provides a calculation of the off-street parking demand generated by the site based on staff levels and intended use of the site. This variance justification applies to the off-street parking requirement for the property located at 100 S. Manchester Avenue. Background The Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) is a public transportation services provider located in the City of Anaheim, California. ATN is governed by the Board of Directors and is the primary policy making body for the provision of public transit services in the greater Anaheim Resort, Platinum Triangle and other areas of Anaheim. ATN provides a comprehensive public transit service, known as the Anaheim Resort Transportation (ART) in the greater Anaheim Resort area, including cities of Anaheim, Orange and Garden Grove, Buena Park and Costa Mesa. ATN is building a new maintenance and operation facility in Anaheim, California, which will become the base of operations for ATN and will house operations, staff, maintenance and storage facilities for 82 buses, and electric bus charging infrastructure. ATN was not able to acquire a parcel large enough to house their operations and maintenance buildings and store the full bus fleet, so the new facilities will be constructed on two separate properties, located at 1227 Claudina Street (Claudina site), and at 100 South Manchester Avenue (Manchester site). Existing Condition The Manchester site covers approximately 1.29 acres bounded by Manchester Avenue to the west, Lincoln Avenue to the north, the I-5 freeway to the east and industrial land use to the south. The site is approximately 800 feet long, and varies in width from 45 feet to 93 feet. The land use designation for this property is General Commercial. Variance Justification: Off-street Parking Requirement – 100 S. Manchester Avenue, Anaheim CA 92802 ATTACHMENT 5 2 Proposed Condition The Manchester site will be used for bus maintenance, bus wash, fleet preparation and administrative staff use. The proposed site plan is shown in Exhibit 1. As shown in Exhibit 2, the site is extremely constrained, and the space in the secure portion of the site south of the building is required for bus circulation, and to allow buses to back out of the maintenance bays and navigate to the exit driveway. The operations and maintenance building will have a footprint of approximately 11,286 square feet, and include a bus maintenance facility on the ground floor. The second floor will include about 7,000 square feet of space for ATN administrative staff use. There will be a general use surface parking lot at the north/west end of the site, near the intersection of Manchester Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. The surface lot will include 20 parking spaces, including: 2 van accessible spaces (9’ X 18’ with a shared 96-inch wide access aisle), 1 van accessible space (9’ X 18’ with a 96-inch wide access aisle) reserved for electric vehicles, 3 standard parking spaces (8.5’ X 18’) reserved for electric vehicles, one delivery and loading space (12’ X 18’), and 13 standard spaces (8.5’ X 18’). On the south side of the building, access will be limited to bus vehicles and authorized employees. Large delivery trucks and sanitation trucks will also be permitted on this portion of the site. There will be 12 parallel parking spaces (8.5’ X 22’) for ATN’s maintenance staff and employee use only striped along the I-5 freeway property line on the south side of the building. Table 1. Parking Space Inventory - Manchester Site 90° Parking Spaces (General Access) 21 ADA – Van (9’ X 18’ with a shared 96-inch wide access aisle) 2 EV Charging – Van Accessible (9’ X 18’ with a 96-inch wide access aisle) 1 EV Charging – Standard (8.5’ X 18’) 3 Delivery and Loading (12’ X 18’) 1 Standard (8.5’ X 18’) 13 Parallel Parking Spaces (Employee Access Only) 12 Standard Parallel (8.5’ X 22’) 12 Parking Spaces (TOTAL) 32 LAND USE DESIGNATION The zoning for this property is General Commercial, but the proposed use will be Public Services. The bus operations and maintenance site will not operate as a transit facility. There are no boardings that occur on-site and the operation is strictly for the administration and maintenance of ATN’s bus fleet. PARKING DEMAND ATN’s bus operations and maintenance facility will have a total gross floor area (GFA) of 18,286 square feet. Public Services land uses are required to provide 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for buildings of 3 stories or lower. To comply with these requirements, there would need to be 73 parking spaces at the Manchester site. 5 ATN’s bus facility will not operate like other Public Services uses. The ground floor will house a bus maintenance facility with three bus bays. The majority of the maintenance work will occur outside of regular business hours. A maximum of 4 maintenance staff are expected to be on site between 9 AM and 5 PM, when the peak parking demand will be generated by the operations portion of the building. The bus maintenance facility will not operate like an automotive repair facility, with customers driving to the site for service. The ground floor bus maintenance area will be used to service ATN’s fleet only, with no visitors from the general public generating vehicle trips or parking demand at the site. The 7,000 square feet of space on the second level of the building will be used by ATN employees for administrative staff and operations use. For this space, the off-street requirement calculations for Public Services use could reasonably be applied. Table 2 summarizes the expected peak parking demand for the Manchester site based on planned use. The parking demand for the bus maintenance portion of the building is based on the number of maintenance employees that will be on site by time of day. For the second level use, rates from Table 42-A for the Public Services use class were used. There will be no general public access to the bus maintenance facility, and it will be used by ATN employees only. Table 2. Parking Demand Generated by ATN’s Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility Use Class Size Parking Requirement Required Spaces Bus Maintenance 11.3 TSF 4 Public Services 3 stories or lower 7.0 TSF 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA 28 TOTAL SPACES 32 Notes: x Requirements from Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.42.040 x TSF – thousand square feet x GFA – gross floor area Based on expected uses and code requirements, the off street parking demand for the Manchester site is 32 spaces. 6 Variance Justification – Landscape and Structural Setback Section 18.42.040 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code requires 4 off-street parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for buildings within a Public Services use class. To satisfy this requirement, ATN would have to provide 73 parking spaces at the Manchester site. Given the physical constraints of the site, including the odd shape and narrow width, it is not possible to provide 73 parking spaces on the site. More importantly, as a bus operations and maintenance facility, the daily parking demand is expected to be significantly lower than 73 spaces. The typical parking demand based on planned use is expected to be 32 parking spaces, and the proposed site plan includes 32 spaces. A variance is requested to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces at the Manchester site from 73 spaces to 32 spaces. Thank you for your consideration. ______________________________________________ _________________ Diana Kotler Date Executive Director Anaheim Resort Transportation 10/01/2021 ANAHEIM TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 1354 S. Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim CA 92805 tel (714) 563-5287 August 11, 2021 City of Anaheim Planning Department Arlette Kim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Variance Justification – Landscape and Structural Setbacks along Freeway ROW Section 18.08.060 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code refers to structural setback requirements in commercial zones. For properties within General Commercial zones, the minimum landscape and structural setback requirement is 10 feet from freeway right-of-way. According to Section 18.08.060.0308, parking spaces may encroach into required structural setback areas, but shall not encroach into minimum required landscape setbacks. This variance justification applies to the landscape and structural setback requirements along the Interstate 5 (I-5) right-of-way for the property located at 100 S. Manchester Avenue. Background The Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) is a public transportation services provider located in the City of Anaheim, California. ATN is governed by the Board of Directors and is the primary policy making body for the provision of public transit services in the greater Anaheim Resort, Platinum Triangle and other areas of Anaheim. ATN provides a comprehensive public transit service, known as the Anaheim Resort Transportation (ART) in the greater Anaheim Resort area, including cities of Anaheim, Orange and Garden Grove, Buena Park and Costa Mesa. ATN is building a new maintenance and operation facility in Anaheim, California, which will become the base of operations for ATN and will house operations, staff, maintenance and storage facilities for 82 buses, and electric bus charging infrastructure. ATN was not able to acquire a parcel large enough to house their operations and maintenance buildings and store the full bus fleet, so the new facilities will be constructed on two separate properties, located at 1227 Claudina Street (Claudina site), and at 100 South Manchester Avenue (Manchester site). Existing Condition The Manchester site covers approximately 1.29 acres bounded by Manchester Avenue to the west, Lincoln Avenue to the north, the I-5 freeway to the east and industrial land use to the south. The site is approximately 800 feet long, and varies in width from 45 feet to 93 feet. The land use designation for this property is General Commercial, and the proposed use is Public Services. Variance Justification: Landscape and Structural Setbacks along Freeway – 100 S. Manchester Avenue, Anaheim CA 92802 ATTACHMENT 6 2 Proposed Condition The Manchester site will be used for bus maintenance, bus wash, fleet preparation and administrative staff use. The proposed architectural site plan (Sheet A-10) is shown in Exhibit 1. The operations and maintenance building will have a footprint of approximately 11,286 square feet, and include a bus maintenance facility on the ground floor. The second floor will include about 7,000 square feet of space for ATN administrative staff use. There will be a general use surface parking lot at the north/west end of the site, near the intersection of Manchester Avenue and Lincoln Avenue. The surface lot will include 21 parking spaces, including: 2 van accessible spaces (9’ X 18’ with a shared 96-inch wide access aisle), 1 van accessible space (9’ X 18’ with a 96-inch wide access aisle) reserved for electric vehicles, 3 standard parking spaces (8.5’ X 18’) reserved for electric vehicles, one delivery and loading space (12’ X 18’), and 14 standard spaces (8.5’ X 18’). Solar canopy structures will be installed over the surface parking spaces, along with a battery energy storage system (BESS) and related equipment. On the south side of the building, access will be limited to bus vehicles and authorized employees. Large delivery trucks and sanitation trucks will also be permitted on this portion of the site. There will be 12 parking spaces for ATN’s maintenance staff and employee use only striped along the I-5 freeway property line on the south side of the building. LANDSCAPE AND STRUCTURAL SETBACK ALONG I-5 FREEWAY The Manchester site is significantly constrained due to its odd shape and extremely narrow depth. At the longest point, the site is approximately 93 feet deep, but less than a quarter of the site measures 93 feet. The site narrows to the south down to 45 feet near the south access driveway. The proposed off-street parking lot will be located on the north side of the building. With the new property line location and 10-foot landscape setback requirement along Manchester Avenue, a functional surface parking lot is not feasible if parking spaces are not allowed within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway ROW. Additional parking spaces for ATN employees with authorized access have been proposed on the south side of the building along the I-5 freeway property line, within the structural and landscape setback area. These 12 spaces will not be available for visitor or general public use, and limited to ATN staff and authorized vehicles only. The south side of the building will be utilized for bus circulation on the site. Buses will enter the site from the south driveway (Driveway 3) to access one of the three maintenance bays. Buses will back out of the maintenance bays and exit the site from the center driveway (Driveway 2). When funding is available, a bus wash will be installed on the south side of the operations and maintenance building, between Driveway 2 and Driveway 3. Bus vehicles will enter the site from Driveway 3 to pass through the future bus wash. As shown in the circulation plan (Sheet C2.0) in Exhibit 2, space for bus circulation on the site is extremely constrained. The elements that will encroach into the 10-foot landscape and structural setback along the I-5 freeway includes: 1.Fourteen (14) 90-degree parking spaces in the general purpose surface parking lot on the north side of the building, and one (1) 12-foot wide delivery and loading space. 2.A solar canopy structure (approximately 21 feet by 125 feet) supported by four columns. 3.A trash enclosure (approximately 8.5 feet by 20.25 feet). 4.Twelve (12) parallel parking spaces for employee use only in the secure bus circulation area south of the building. 5 GENERAL PURPOSE 90-DEGREE PARKING SPACES The surface parking lot on the north side of the building is constrained by the irregular and narrow shape of the property. Due to the proximity to Lincoln Avenue and the Caltrans right-of- way limitations, the parking lot can only be served by a single driveway. If parking is not permitted on the Manchester site within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway, this would eliminate almost all of the off-street parking for the site. The Caltrans property adjacent to the Manchester site contains a landscaped berm and slope. If the rear landscape setback requirement is waived for the site to allow for off-street parking, there will still be more than 10 feet of landscaping along the rear property line on the Caltrans side, providing the desired aesthetic intended by the rear landscape setback requirement. SOLAR (PV) CANOPY STRUCTURE AND EQUIPMENT Canopies will be installed over the parking spaces in the surface parking lot on the north side of the building. One of the canopies will encroach into the landscape and structural setback along the I-5 freeway. Detailed structural design of the canopies has not been completed, but based on a standard configuration, the canopy is expected to be 124’-6” long and 20’-10” deep. The canopy will be supported by four rectangular columns, which will be located in the landscaped strip between the surface parking lot curb and the property line. The columns are expected to be 8 inches by 12 inches, with a 2-foot diameter foundation that will not extend above ground level. Equipment associated with the solar canopy including a charger transformer, disconnect and panelboard will also be located within the 10-foot landscape and structural setback. The solar canopy footprint, equipment and column locations are highlighted in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3. Solar canopy footprint and column locations. Minimum vertical clearance under the canopy will be 12 feet. Photovoltaic cells will be mounted on the roof of each canopy. A typical section for the solar canopy structure is shown in Exhibit 4. 6 Exhibit 4. Typical PV Canopy section. This solar canopy structure can not be relocated outside of the landscape and structural setback. Moving the canopy outside of the setback would place the support columns within the surface parking lot, and result in the loss of three parking spaces. The canopy would also no longer cover about half of each parking space, and would not provide shade for the parked vehicles. TRASH ENCLOSURE The trash enclosure has been designed according to the City of Anaheim Trash Enclosure Requirements. The enclosure will be approximately 20.25 feet wide and 8.5-feet deep, with space for a trash bin and a recycle bin located side by side. ATN’s designer coordinated with the Sanitation Department to determine the preferred location for the trash enclosure, based on the sanitation truck path through the site and bus circulation in and out of the maintenance bays. The Sanitation Department’s recommended location for the trash enclosure is along the Caltrans property line, and within the landscape and structural setback. The proposed location of the trash enclosure is highlighted in Exhibit 5. 7 Exhibit 5. Proposed trash enclosure location. SECURE PARALLEL PARKING SPACES The general use surface parking lot on the north side of the operations and maintenance building includes 21 parking spaces. A parking demand analysis for the site based on expected use and the number of employees on site by time of day determined that 32 parking spaces are required. To meet this demand, 12 additional parallel parking spaces (8.5’ X 22’) are proposed on the south side of the building along the I-5 freeway right-of-way. These parking spaces would be available for use by ATN employees with authorized access to the secure portion of the site only. These 12 parking spaces, which are highlighted in Exhibit 6, are located within the 10-foot landscape setback. Due to the constrained size of the property, there are no other places where these parking spaces can be accommodated. Exhibit 6. Proposed parallel parking spaces within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway right-of-way. The Caltrans property adjacent to the Manchester site contains a landscaped berm and slope. If the rear landscape setback requirement is waived for the site to allow for off-street parking, there will still be more than 10 feet of landscaping along the rear property line on the Caltrans side, providing the desired aesthetic intended by the rear landscape setback requirement. 8 Variance Justification – Landscape and Structural Setback Section 18.08.060.0308 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code states that parking spaces may encroach into required structural setback areas, but shall not encroach into minimum required landscape setbacks. The Manchester site is oddly shaped and significantly constrained in depth, particularly for bus circulation. The south end of the site is less than 45 feet wide. With a 10-foot front setback and a 10-foot rear setback, usable site is less than 19 feet wide. If parking is not permitted on the Manchester site within the landscape setback along the I-5 freeway, this would eliminate almost all of the off-street parking for the site. The rear property line is adjacent to the I-5 freeway, and there is a landscaped berm abutting the rear property line. If the rear landscape setback requirement is waived for the site to allow for bus circulation and parking, there will still be more than 10 feet of landscaping along the rear property line on the Caltrans side, providing the desired aesthetic intended by the rear landscape setback requirement. A variance is required to allow parking, a solar canopy shade structure, and bus circulation within the landscape and structural setback along the I-5 freeway right-of-way. Thank you for your consideration. ______________________________________________ _________________ Diana Kotler Date Executive Director Anaheim Resort Transportation 08/11/2021 1 CITY OF ANAHEIM Environmental Checklist Form Class 32 Categorical Exemption Infill Development Projects CASE NO.:DEVELOPMENT CASE NO. 2021‐00094 PROJECT APPLICANT: Anaheim Transportation Network NAME: Diana Kotler, Executive Director COMPANY: Anaheim Transportation Network ADDRESS:2626 East Katella Avenue CITY/ST/ZIP: Anaheim, CA E‐MAIL: dkotler@atnetwork.org PHONE: 714‐563‐5287 LEAD AGENCY AND STAFF CONTACT: LEAD AGENCY: City of Anaheim STAFF CONTACT:Andy T. Uk ADDRESS:200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 CITY/ST/ZIP: Anaheim, CA 92805 E‐MAIL: AUk@anaheim.net PHONE: 714.765.5238 PROJECT ADDRESS: 100 South Manchester Avenue APN(s): 250‐132‐15, ‐13, ‐10, ‐09, ‐07 ATTACHMENT 7 Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location and Setting The project site is located at 100 South Manchester Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. The approximate 1.29‐acre site includes five parcels: Assessor Parcel Numbers 250‐132‐15, ‐13, ‐10, ‐09, and ‐07. The project site is bordered by Lincoln Avenue to the north, Interstate 5 (I‐5) to the east, Adams Street to the south, and Manchester Avenue to the west. Regional vehicular access to the project site is provided from I‐5, which is immediately east of the site. Local access is provided from Lincoln Avenue, Manchester Avenue, and Broadway. The project site is depicted in a regional and local context on Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning describes in greater detail the surrounding land uses and zoning. Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Direction Existing Land Uses Zone Classification North Lincoln Avenue and I‐5 Not Applicable South Light industrial uses including automobile repair and body work, Union Pacific West Anaheim Yard across Manchester Avenue I Industrial East I‐5 Not Applicable West Light industrial uses including self‐storage, automobile repair, salvage yard, Union Pacific Railroad tracks across Manchester Avenue I Industrial Source: City of Anaheim. Property Info Map. Available at https://gis.anaheim.net/PropertyInfo/?APN=12809110. Accessed on February 24, 2022. Existing Conditions The linear, irregularly shaped project site is currently vacant but has several existing curb cuts along Manchester Avenue and a chain link fence around the site’s perimeter. Vegetation is limited to shrubs and weeds with several palm tree stumps on the site behind the public sidewalk along Manchester Avenue and within the project site. The project site has been paved in the past. It is relatively flat and has an elevation of approximately 135 feet above mean sea level. Land Use Designations and Zoning The Anaheim General Plan land use designation for the project site is General Commercial (C‐G). The C‐G designation allows for a wide range of uses including highway‐serving uses such as fast food, restaurants, auto‐oriented uses such as tire stores, service stations, auto parts stores, and other stand‐alone retail uses. The C‐G land use designation permits a Floor Area Ratio of 0.25 to 0.50. Similarly, the project site is zoned General Commercial (C‐G), which allows for automotive parts sales, retail centers, and restaurants. The proposed bus maintenance and administration use is classified as a Public Service Use, which is a permitted use under the C‐G zoning district designation pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030.. The project proposes a bus maintenance facility with administrative offices and bus wash. The proposed project has a FAR of 0.36 and would be consistent with the C‐G FAR requirements. EXHIBIT 1: Vicinity Map Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project Lincoln AvenueLincoln Avenue M a n c h e s t e r A v e n u e M a n c h e s t e r A v e n u e BroadwayBroadwaySouth Adam South Adam StreetStreet West Center West Center StreetStreet Project SiteProject Site Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 3 Project Characteristics Site Development The project site plan is depicted in Exhibit 2: Site Plan. The proposed project would allow for the construction of a two‐story concrete tilt‐up bus maintenance and administration building sited in the northern half of the project site. The 18,349‐square‐foot two‐story building would have a lobby, breakroom, offices, lockers, and bus maintenance workshop area on the first floor, and conference rooms, additional offices, and open loft area on the second floor. In addition, a 2,120‐square‐foot bus wash station is proposed in the southern portion of the site and would be developed as part of a future project phase. The proposed project would support the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) transit operations and maintenance. Off‐street parking would be provided at a surface parking lot for employees and visitors near the Manchester Avenue at Lincoln Avenue intersection and southern portion of the project site. The proposed project would have 21 stalls in the surface lot and 12 parallel stalls along the project site’s eastern boundary in the southern portion of the site. In total, the proposed project includes 33 passenger vehicle stalls, with 11 standard stalls, 12 parallel stalls, 2 van accessible stall, 1 delivery and loading stall, 3 standard electric vehicle (EV) stalls, 1 van accessible EV stall, and 3 clean air vanpool stalls. The proposed project would include EV chargers and solar infrastructure. Specifically, a 220‐volt (Level 2) charger and 80‐volt (Level 3) chargers would be in the maintenance area and east of the future bus wash station. These chargers would be available for ATN buses that are receiving maintenance or repair services and are not intended for regular bus charging activities. The proposed project would also install six, Level 2 chargers in the surface parking lot for staff and ATN support vehicle use. A photovoltaic carport canopy system would be installed over the surface parking lot and would power Level 2 and Level 3 electric vehicle chargers, as well as a battery energy storage system (BESS). Administration operations are expected to occur seven days a week between the hours of 6:00 AM and 10 PM, with majority of staff on the project site between 10 AM and 4 PM. Meanwhile, fleet preparation and routine upkeep maintenance activities would occur seven days a week between 10 PM and 4:30 AM. Architecture and Design Exhibit 3: Conceptual Exterior Elevations depicts the proposed project’s architectural features, which is characterized as modern industrial design. The proposed bus maintenance and administration building would use a variety of different materials including aluminum composite metal coverings, plaster, metal coping, and exposed concrete masonry units. The building would have a blue and grey color scheme. The bus maintenance and administration building would have an aluminum storefront main entrance with insulated glass. Windows are proposed on the second floor for the administrative offices. Open Space and Landscaping Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.090 requires developments within C‐G zoning districts to provide a minimum of 1 tree for every 20 linear feet of street frontage, drought tolerant shrubbery and groundcover, and landscaped parking lots. The proposed project’s landscaping includes trees, shrubs, and groundcover, as shown in Exhibit 4: Conceptual Landscape Space Plan. Brisbane box trees are proposed along the Manchester Avenue frontage, with blue hibiscus, dwarf bottle brush, fortnight lily, and deergrass shrubs and groundcover. The vehicular access to the surface parking lot would be landscaped with western redbud trees with deer grass and prostrate rosemary as groundcover. The eastern boundary EXHIBIT 2: Site Plan Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project EXHIBIT 3: Conceptual Exterior Elevations Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project EXHIBIT 4: Conceptual Landscape Plan Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 4 of the project site fronting I‐5 would be landscaped with fruitland silverberry and red yucca shrubs. Landscaping would be drought tolerant and comply with City requirements (Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance). Access and Parking Exhibit 5: Circulation Plan shows the proposed project’s on‐site circulation. As previously noted, there existing curb cuts along the project site frontage on Manchester Avenue. Project implementation would redevelop and propose three new driveways on Manchester Avenue, as described in Table 2: Project Driveways. Table 2: Project Driveways Driveway Location Width Movement Restriction 1 380 feet south of Lincoln Avenue 24 feet Right‐In, Right Out Open to public 2 Across Adams Street 56 feet Right‐In Only Gated – only for ATN vehicles and buses 3 435 feet north of Broadway 66 feet Right‐Out Only Gated – only for ATN vehicles and buses Source: Ware Malcomb, 2022. ATN buses would enter the project site from Driveway 3 to access the proposed bus wash facility or maintenance bays at the southern end of the bus facility building. ATN buses would have radio frequency identification (RFID) to permit ingress to the sliding gate access. As a result, gates would automatically open when buses are proximate to the project site. To exit the project site, buses would use Driveway 2. Both Driveway 2 and 3 would be restricted to right‐turn in and out movements due to the raised median on Manchester Avenue. All driveways would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers for emergency and fire vehicles. Table 3: Project Parking Plan identifies the number of parking spaces required by land use pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.42. The proposed project requires 32 spaces and would provide 33 parking spaces, including 13 standard spaces and 12 parallel stalls, 2 van accessible stalls, 1 delivery loading, and 4 electric vehicle (EV) spaces, inclusive of one EV van accessible space. The parking demand for the bus maintenance land use is based on the maximum number of bus maintenance employees that would be on the site at any given time. The proposed project would include 33 parking spaces and satisfy the City’s requirements. Table 3: Project Parking Plan Land Use Size Parking Required Required Spaces Spaces Provided Bus Maintenance 11,000 sf ‐ 4 4 Office/Administrative 7,000 sf 4 spaces per 1,000 sf of gross floor area 28 29 32 33 Source: Ware Malcomb, 2022. EXHIBIT 5: Circulation Plan Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 5 Utilities The proposed project would require water utilities for office, landscaping, and bus wash uses, wastewater utilities to convey sewage from the project site, and electric utilities for the bus maintenance building, administrative office, outdoor lighting, charging infrastructure, and entrance gate uses. Wastewater and Water Anaheim Public Utilities and Anaheim Sanitation provide wastewater and water services, respectively to the project site. There is an existing six‐inch sanitary sewer line in Manchester Avenue. A proposed six‐ inch sanitary sewer line connection would extend from Manchester Avenue toward the project site and connect via a 4‐inch point of connection at the southern end of the bus maintenance and administration building. The sanitary sewer line would then extend south toward the bus wash facility and terminate 20 feet west of Driveway 3. There is an existing 8‐inch to 12‐inch domestic water line in Manchester Avenue, and an existing 6‐inch domestic water line in Center Street that bisects the project site. Project implementation would remove the existing water line bisecting the site. Water service would be provided by connecting to the existing water line in Manchester Avenue near Driveway 1 via a new 4‐inch line. The proposed water line would extend into the main surface parking lot until reaching the bus maintenance and administration building. Storm Water Storm flows would sheet flow into proposed catch basins located throughout the project site, which would conveyed surface water via a looped storm drain system to pre‐treatment biotreatment vault located near Driveway 1, before flowing into a subsurface infiltration basin located underneath the surface parking lot. During low flow scenarios, stormwater would infiltrate. Under high flow scenarios and storm events, flows would by‐pass the biotreatment vault and infiltration basin and directly drain into a gutter system on Manchester Avenue. Electricity There are underground transformers and electrical lines in Manchester Avenue. As described above, the proposed project would include Level 2 and Level 3 EV chargers, and a photovoltaic carport canopy at the main surface lot. A new utility transformer and BESS to support the photovoltaic infrastructure, and panel boards are proposed at the northern portion of the surface parking lot. Project implementation would connect to existing electrical infrastructure in Manchester Avenue. A new proposed on‐site transformer would support the bus maintenance operations as well as the energy demand from charging electric vehicles. Discretionary and Ministerial Approvals The following discretionary and ministerial actions and/or approvals are required for the proposed project:  Grading and Building Permits by Anaheim Building Division  Deviation to increase standard driveway width from 30‐foot wide maximum to 56‐foot wide and 66‐foot wide driveways to accommodate buses  Variance to reduce required 10‐foot landscaped setback to 0‐foot setback along the rear property line  Variance to reduce the number of required parking stalls from 72 parking spaces to 32 parking spaces Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/COMPLIANCE (CEQA) Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), sets forth that the CEQA Guidelines establish a list of classes of projects that have been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and which, therefore, are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. The proposed project is consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32: In‐fill development projects) applies to projects characterized as infill development meeting the following conditions: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The proposed project’s consistency with these conditions is described below. (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan land use designation of Commercial General and zoning district of C‐G (General Commercial). The proposed project would construct a bus maintenance and administration building and bus wash facility for the ATN. The C‐G zone allows for a wide variety of commercial‐related uses, including highway‐serving uses and auto‐oriented uses such as restaurants, fast food, tire stores, service stations, and auto part stores, office uses, public services, and limited industrial uses. The proposed bus maintenance and administration use is classified as a Public Service Use and is a permitted use under the C‐G zoning district designation pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030. The maximum FAR is 0.5 in the C‐G zoning district. The proposed project would have a FAR of 0.36. The proposed project would require two variances (parking and setbacks) due to the project site’s irregular shape and physical limitations. In addition, a Public Works administrative deviation from the City’s standard driveway width is required to accommodate bus ingress and egress from the site. The first variance would allow for a reduction in the number of on‐site parking spaces from 72 parking spaces to 32 parking spaces. Section 18.42.040 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code requires 4 off‐street parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for buildings within a Public Services use class. To satisfy this requirement, ATN would have to provide 73 parking spaces at the subject site. Given the physical constraints of the site, including the odd shape and narrow width, it is not possible to provide 73 parking spaces on the site. Based on a parking demand study prepared for the bus operations and maintenance facility, the daily parking demand is expected to be expected to be 32 parking spaces, and the proposed project includes 33 spaces. The second variance would allow for development within the landscape setbacks. Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.060 does not allow for parking spaces to encroach into the minimum required Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 7 landscape setbacks. Due to the project site’s irregular shape and width constraints, adhering to the typical development standards would further limit the project site’s buildable area. The variance would allow for the development of parking spaces within the landscape setbacks so that the project site can meet off‐ street parking requirements. Without the variance, the project site could not support the required off‐ street parking. The administrative deviation would allow the proposed project to deviate from the standard 24‐ to 30‐ foot width for commercial driveways. The proposed project would remove the existing 3 driveways and construct 3 new driveways measuring 24 feet (Driveway 1), 56 feet (Driveway 2), and 66 feet wide (Driveway 3). Driveways 2 and 3, which would be the primary access points for ATN buses, would be wider than the standard width to accommodate the buses and sanitation trucks, and would provide additional room to prevent queues onto Manchester Street. Due to the physical limitations of the project site, and the specific proposed use of the site, a variance is needed for wider driveways. Although the proposed project would require variances, it would still be consistent with General Plan goals and policies. Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis summarizes the proposed project’s consistency with applicable General Plan goals and policies. Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis Goals Policies Consistency Analysis Land Use Element Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses. Policy 4.1.1: Ensure that land uses develop in accordance with the Land Use Plan and Zoning Code in an effort to attain land use compatibility. Consistent. The project site has a land use designation and zoning district of General Commercial (C‐G), which allows highway‐ serving uses such as fast‐food restaurants, auto‐oriented uses such as tire stores and auto parts, and stand‐alone‐retail uses. Transit facilities are permitted under the C‐G zoning district with a conditional use permit (Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030). The maximum FAR under the C‐G land use designation is 0.50, and the proposed project’s FAR would be 0.36. The proposed project is a bus maintenance facility with administrative offices and bus wash and is consistent with transit facility uses. Surrounding land uses include light industrial uses (e.g., automotive repair, a salvage yard, self‐storage) and I‐5. Therefore, the development is compatible with the Land Use Plan and Zoning Code. Circulation Element Goal 12.1: Ensure adequate parking is made available to City residents, visitors, and businesses. Policy 12.1.1: Assess the adequacy of existing or proposed on‐ and off‐ street parking, as needed, especially in urban and commercial areas, to ensure that an adequate supply is provided. Consistent. Proposed parking would be consistent with the requirements outlined in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.42. The proposed project requires 32 and proposes 33 parking spaces, including with 11 standard stalls, 12 parallel stalls, 2 van accessible stall, Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 8 Table 4: General Plan Consistency Analysis Goals Policies Consistency Analysis 1 delivery and loading stall, 3 standard electric vehicle (EV) stalls, 1 van accessible EV stall, and 3 clean air vanpool stalls. Therefore, an adequate parking is provided. Green Element Goal 10.1: Improve the efficiency and ridership of public transit within the City. Policy 10.1.1: Continue to expand the convenience and quality of local transit service. Consistent. The proposed project would develop a two‐story concrete tilt‐up bus maintenance building that will serve ATN, the City’s local transit provider. This maintenance facility would ensure the resources are in place to improve the quality of the local transit service. Goal 12.1: Continue to be a county leader in the use of electric and alternative fuel vehicles. Policy 12.1.3: Continue to work with Anaheim businesses to assist with fleet conversion to alternative fuels. Consistent. The proposed project would include EV chargers and solar infrastructure to support ATN’s transition to zero emission electric fleet. The proposed project includes a 220‐volt (Level 2) charger and 80‐volt (Level 3) chargers for the buses that are receiving maintenance or repair services. Six Level 2 chargers for staff and ATN support vehicle use would be provided at the surface parking lot. Project implementation would assist ATN with the conversion from gas powered bus fleet to a zero emission electric fleet. Goal 17.1 Encourage building and site design standards that reduce energy costs. Policy 17.1.1: Encourage designs that incorporate solar and wind exposure features such as daylighting design, natural ventilation, space planning and thermal massing. Consistent. A photovoltaic carport canopy system would be installed over the surface parking lot and would power Level 2 and Level 3 EV chargers, as well as the battery energy storage system (BESS). The use of solar panels would capture renewable energy to power EV chargers on the project site. Community Design Element Goal 9.1: Anaheim’s industrial areas and the buildings within them are strategically planned, visually distinctive and attractive, abundantly landscaped, and appropriately signed. Policy 9.1.5: Use abundant landscaping to minimize views of surface parking, storage and service areas. Consistent. The proposed project would minimize views of surface parking and storage areas by including landscaping along the perimeter of the parking area, including several Tristania Conferta (Brisbane Box) trees along Manchester Avenue. Further, Driveway 1 would be landscaped with western redbud trees with deer grass and prostrate rosemary as groundcover. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 9 (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The 1.29‐acre project site is currently vacant but surrounded by a developed and urban environment within the City of Anaheim’s jurisdictional boundaries. Land uses proximate to the site are predominately industrial with I‐5 immediately to the east. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with this condition. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Vegetation on the project site is limited to shrubs and weeds. The project site has been paved in the past and the surrounding area is developed with urban uses. According to the National Wetlands Inventory and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species online databases, there are no sensitive biological resources on or proximate to the project site. Further, the project site lacks the resources and conditions to support special‐status species, sensitive habitats, wetlands and/or waters, wildlife corridors, nurseries or rookeries. (c) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Attachments as appendices to this Class 32 Exemption are used to transmit technical memorandums and reports that address Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) screening (Attachment A), air quality (Attachment B), and water quality (Attachment C). The proposed project would not have significant effects on the environment related to these topical areas. Traffic The project site’s regional vehicular access would be via I‐5 which is immediately east of the site. The project site’s local access would be from Lincoln Avenue, Manchester Avenue, and Broadway. As part of the proposed project operations, the ATN bus fleet would be stored and charged at a separate ATN facility. Bus drivers are not expected to visit the project site as part of typical daily operations. As a result, the proposed project is not expected to generate daily bus trips to and from the site. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) does not have a trip generation for bus maintenance and operations facilities. Rather, trip generation was generated based on current and planned future operations, which is detailed within Attachment A. The proposed project would generate approximately 100 daily trips (bus and passenger vehicle trips), with 10 trips in the morning peak hour and 8 trips in the evening peak hour. Daily bus traffic to the project site would occur once the bus wash facility is operational and are included in the total trip generation estimate. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessment. Senate Bill (SB) 743 was approved by the California legislature in September 2013. SB 743 required changes to CEQA, specifically directing the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to develop alternative metrics to the use of vehicular “level of service” (LOS) for evaluating transportation projects. OPR prepared a technical advisory (“OPR Technical Advisory”) for evaluating transportation impacts in CEQA and requiring that VMT replace LOS as the primary measure of transportation impacts. The OPR Technical Advisory suggests that cities may screen out VMT impacts using project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing to quickly identify when a project should be expected to cause a less than significant impact without conducting a detailed study. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 10 The City of Anaheim VMT guidelines provide screening criteria for projects including Type 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening, Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening, and Type 3: Project Type Screening. The proposed project would be screened from providing a detailed VMT analysis based on the Type 3 screening criteria. The City’s Type 3 Project Type Screening specifies that certain project types are eligible to screen from VMT assessment since the project type is assumed to be a low‐VMT generating project. Projects that provide services to the local community or generate less than 110 daily vehicle trips are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact and are eligible for Type 3 screening. The proposed project is not a retail or public service use that would generate significant visitors. The proposed project would support ATN local transit operations and maintenance. It is expected to generate 80 vehicle trips per day from administrative and maintenance employees traveling to and from the project site. In addition, 20 bus trips per day are anticipated once the bus wash facility is operational. In total, the proposed project would generate 100 daily trips, which is under the 110 daily trip threshold for Type 3 Screening. Additionally, the proposed project would support transit service operations that has a net impact of reducing vehicle miles traveled in the City of Anaheim. Traffic Conclusion. Since the proposed project generates less than 110 daily vehicle trips, it is presumed to have a less than significant traffic impact. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Noise Mobile sources of noise are the most common and significant sources of noise in the City. The most common mobile sources of noise come from automobiles, such as cars and trucks. Other sources of noise that is generated throughout the City comes from stationary noise sources. Stationary noise sources are produced via various land use activities from residential, commercial, institutional, and recreational and parks activities. The existing mobile noise sources in the project area are generated by motor vehicles traveling on I‐5, Manchester Avenue, and Lincoln Avenue. The primary sources of stationary noise in the project area are those associated with the surrounding industrial uses. Mobile noise sources are associated with train activities at the Union Pacific Railroad tracks across Manchester Avenue and vehicles on I‐5. The nearest sensitive receptors1 are single‐family residences along West Center Street, which are approximately 745 feet east of the project site and east of I‐5. Noise generated by construction equipment, including earthmovers, material handlers, and portable generators, can reach high levels. Specifically, graders, pavers, and trucks can generate noise levels of 85, 85, and 84 decibels at 50 feet from the source.2 During construction, exterior noise levels can affect sensitive receptors near the construction site. However, given the proximity to existing noise sources including mobile noise from I‐5, Manchester Avenue, and Lincoln Avenue, and the general industrial nature of the surrounding area, construction noise would not impact sensitive receptors. Although construction noise levels may exceed the existing ambient levels in the area, construction would be temporary and would not result in a permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the area. Further, proposed project construction would adhere to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, which would 1 City of Anaheim General Plan defines noise sensitive land uses as schools, libraries, and churches 2 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 11 further minimize impacts from construction noise, as construction would be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Project implementation would create new sources of noise in the project area. Project operations would include a bus maintenance and administration building and bus wash facility for ATN vehicles. Specifically, the proposed project would include EV charging infrastructure which would enable ATN to electrify their bus fleet and replace their existing gas‐fueled fleet. Other primary sources associated with the proposed project would include mechanical equipment and off‐site traffic noise. Mechanical equipment (e.g., heating, ventilation, and air conditioning [HVAC] equipment) typically generates noise levels of approximately 52 dBA at 50 feet.3 Sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.4 The nearest sensitive receptors (single‐family residences 745 feet east of the project site and I‐5) would not be located proximate to HVAC equipment at the project site. Further, mechanical equipment would be located internal to the project site and would not exceed the City’s 60 dBA exterior noise standard set forth in Municipal Code Section 6.70.010. Therefore, impacts from mechanical equipment would be less than significant. Project implementation would result in an increase of traffic trips to project area roadways. As discussed above, the proposed project would generate 100 daily trips, including 80 daily trips from employees and maintenance staff and 20 bus trips. In general, a 3‐dBA increase in traffic noise is barely perceptible to people, while a 5‐dBA increase is readily noticeable. Traffic volumes on project area roadways would have to approximately double for the resulting traffic noise levels to generate a barely perceptible 3‐dBA increase.5According to the City of Anaheim Daily Traffic Counts by OCTA, Manchester Avenue has approximately 7,800 average daily trips.6 The proposed project would result in approximately 100 net daily trips, which is not enough to double the existing traffic volumes on Manchester Avenue. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate enough traffic to result in a noticeable 3‐dBA increase in ambient noise levels. Noise Conclusion. Project implementation would result in less than significant short‐term and long‐term noise impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Air Quality Construction Emissions. Construction associated with the proposed project would generate short‐term emissions of criteria air pollutants. The criteria pollutants of primary concern within the project area include ozone precursor pollutants (i.e., Reactive Organic Gases [ROG] and Nitrous Oxide [NOx], Particulate Matter 10 [PM10], and [PM2.5]). Construction‐generated emissions are short term and of temporary duration, lasting only as long as construction activities occur. However, construction emissions are considered a significant air quality impact if the volume of pollutants generated exceeds the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Construction results in the 3 Elliott H. Berger, Rick Neitzel1, and Cynthia A. Kladden, Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015. 4 Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 5 According to the California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), it takes a doubling of traffic to create a noticeable (i.e., 3 dBA) noise increase. 6 According to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Department, Daily Traffic Counts – Average Daily Traffic Volume Map, Manchester Avenue has 7,800 ADT Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 12 temporary generation of emissions resulting from site grading, road paving, motor vehicle exhaust associated with construction equipment and worker trips, and the movement of construction equipment, especially on unpaved surfaces. Emissions of airborne particulate matter are largely dependent on the amount of ground disturbance associated with site preparation activities as well as weather conditions and the appropriate application of water. The duration of construction activities for the proposed project is estimated to be 24 months, based on the applicant’s construction schedule. Construction‐generated emissions associated the proposed project were calculated using the CARB‐approved California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), which is designed to model emissions for land use development projects based on typical construction requirements. See Attachment B: Air Quality Data for more information regarding the construction assumptions used in this analysis. Predicted maximum daily construction‐generated emissions for the proposed project are identified in Table 5: Project Construction Emissions. It should be noted that the air quality analysis assumed a construction schedule from 2021 to 2022. No new air quality modeling would be required because proposed project emissions are far below SCAQMD thresholds. Additionally, construction years in the future would use more efficient construction equipment due to adoption of Tier IV standards, which would result in less emissions. Therefore, the air quality analysis with an earlier construction schedule represents a conservative proposed project emissions estimate. Table 5: Project Construction Emissions Construction Year Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 2021 2.2 22.9 14.8 6.0 3.6 2022 35.4 22.5 17.4 6.1 3.6 SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment B for model outputs. Table 5 shows that construction pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds. While impacts would be considered less than significant, the proposed project would also be subject to SCAQMD Rules 402, 403, and 1113, which prohibit nuisances, require dust control measures, and limit VOC content in paints, respectively. Compliance with the standards SCAQMD rules would further reduce specific construction‐related emissions. As shown above, all criteria pollutant emissions would remain below their respective thresholds and impacts would be less than significant. Operational Emissions. Operational emissions are typically associated with mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicle use) and area sources (such as the use of landscape maintenance equipment, hearths, consumer products, and architectural coatings). Energy source emissions would be generated from electricity and natural gas (non‐hearth) usage. Table 6: Project Operational Emissions summarizes the operational emissions attributable to the proposed project. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s emissions would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, regional operational emissions would result in a less than significant long‐term regional air quality impact. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 13 Table 6: Project Operational Emissions Source Emissions (pounds per day)1 ROG NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 Mobile 0.19 0.20 1.9 0.47 0.13 Total 0.61 0.22 1.9 0.47 0.13 SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 55 SCAQMD Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No Source: CalEEMod version 2020.4.0. Refer to Attachment B for model outputs. Air Quality Conclusion. Project implementation would not have significant short‐term or long‐term air quality impacts. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Water Quality Under existing conditions, runoff sheet flows in a northeasterly direction toward I‐5 and northwesterly direction toward a gutter system along Manchester Avenue. There is no existing storm drain infrastructure onsite. As discussed above, with implementation of the proposed project, storm water would sheet flow toward gutters and catch basins located throughout the site. Flows would be conveyed toward a biotreatment Best Management Practice (BMP) for pre‐treatment before flowing to an underground infiltration BMP. During high flow scenarios, flows would bypass the pre‐treatment and infiltration BMP via outlet pipes to flow out through a parkway drain toward a gutter system on Manchester Avenue. Construction and demolition activities subject to the Construction General Permit for Stormwater Discharge Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) include but not limited to clearing, grading, grubbing, or excavation, or any other activity that results in a land disturbance equal to or greater than one acre. The proposed project would disturb approximately 1.28 gross acres and would be subject to the Construction General Permit. To obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit, the applicant is required to file, with the State Water Board, Permit Registration Documents (PRDs), which include a Notice of Intent (NOI) and other compliance‐related documents. The Construction General Permit requires development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and monitoring plan, which must include erosion‐control and sediment control BMPs that would meet or exceed measures required by the Construction General Permit to control potential construction‐related pollutants. Erosion‐control BMPs prevent erosion, whereas sediment controls trap sediment once it has been mobilized. The types of required BMPs are relative to the amount of soil disturbed, the types of pollutants used or stored at the project site, and proximity to water bodies. Additionally, the proposed project would be subject to compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Section 10.09.070, which requires compliance with the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and any conditions and requirements established by the City in order to meet federal and State water quality requirements related to stormwater runoff. The DAMP reduces the pollution content of stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). The purpose of the Orange County DAMP is to Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 14 satisfy the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit conditions for creating and implementing a Storm Water Management Plan to reduce pollutant discharges to the MEP.7 The DAMP contains guidelines on structural and nonstructural BMPs for meeting the NPDES goals. BMPs include erosion controls, sediment controls, wind erosion controls, tracking controls, non‐storm water management, and waste and materials management. Following compliance with NPDES and Anaheim Municipal Code requirements, which include implementation of BMPs, the proposed project’s construction‐related activities would not violate any water quality standards or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan has been prepared. Subsequent to approval of the proposed project, the applicant will submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan. Project compliance with existing codes and regulations would result in less than significant impacts to water quality. Water Quality Conclusion. Project implementation would not result in significant water quality impacts. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. (d) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Project implementation would require the construction of new on‐site utility infrastructure to serve the bus maintenance and administration building and bus wash facility. The proposed project would connect the proposed utilities to existing off‐site utility infrastructure, with the final sizing and design of on‐site facilities occurring during final building design and plan check. Water and Sewer Anaheim Public Utilities provides for water and wastewater services to the project site. According to the Anaheim 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, commercial, institutional and industrial land uses in the City used 20,912‐acre feet (AF) in 2020, and is expected to increase to 29,523 AF by 20458. Anaheim Public Utilities is expected to supply the estimated water needs for the City between 2020 to 2045 for normal, single‐dry year, and multiple‐dry year conditions, and is looking to expand its recycled water facility to increase water reliability. The proposed project is estimated to use 431,162 gallons (1.32 AF) annually, inclusive of approximately 155,722 gallons annually for irrigation, 93,440 gallons annually for plumbing fixtures such as sinks and toilets, and 182,000 gallons annually for the bus wash facility. The City’s water supply is projected to be approximately 66,337 AF by 2045. The proposed project’s water demand would be less than one percent of expected total demand in 2045. Sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the proposed project. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) treats wastewater collected within City. The OCSD service area comprises 479 square miles of northern and central Orange County and has 579 miles of sewer lines, 15 off‐site pumping stations, 2 regional wastewater treatment plants, and an ocean disposal system. 7 The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program was established by the Clean Water Act to regulate municipal and industrial discharges to surface waters of the US from their municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). Under the NPDES program, all facilities which discharge pollutants into waters of the US are required to obtain an NPDES permit. Requirements for storm water discharges are also regulated under this program. 8 City of Anaheim, 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Table 4‐2, available at: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim‐2020‐UWMP?bidId= . Accessed March 4, 2022 Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 15 Wastewater flows by gravity from the City sewer system to OCSD’s trunk and interceptor sewers, then to regional treatment and disposal facilities. OCSD operates two regional facilities, specifically Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2 located in the cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach, respectively. Plant No. 1 treats an average of 117 million gallons of sewage per day and Plant No.2 treats an average of 67 million gallons of sewage per day. The proposed project would generate 256 gallons of sewage a day, a negligible amount compared available wastewater treatment plant capacity at OCSD facilities. Therefore, the project site would be adequately served by wastewater utilities. Telecommunications The project site is located in a built‐out, urban setting. Various telecom service providers serve the site and the surrounding properties. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades required to serve the proposed project. Electricity Anaheim Public Utilities provides electric power to the City. The proposed project is expected to use 1,172 megawatt hours (MWh) annually to power 9 buses and 1,032 MWh annually for utility consumption, totaling 2,205.09 MWh. The photovoltaic array at the main surface parking lot would produce 140 MWh annually, which would reduce the proposed project’s annual electricity usage to 2,064.69 MWh. The City’s expected energy demand would increase by 82,000 MWh from 2018‐2030 due to planned expansion projects and electric demand growth. The proposed project would represent a small fraction of the City’s expected 82,000 MWh increase in electricity usage. Therefore, the proposed project would be adequately served by electric utilities. The proposed project would not substantially increase service demand for electricity through substantial unplanned population growth and existing systems and supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project. Natural Gas The Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) provides natural gas to the City, inclusive of the project site. The project site is in an urbanized area and connected to existing natural gas infrastructure; no off‐ site infrastructure improvements would be required. The proposed project would not substantially increase service demand for natural gas through substantial unplanned population growth and existing systems and supplies would be sufficient to support ATN operations at the project site. Fire Services The City of Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department provides fire protection services throughout the City, inclusive to the project area. The Fire and Rescue Department operates 12 fire stations and employs 209 sworn fire personnel.9 The proposed project would incrementally increase demands for fire protection services associated with service calls, inspections, etc. However, the demand for fire protection services would be minimal and can be met with existing fire resources. Additionally, the proposed project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The City provides for additional fire personnel and associated facilities through its annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program review process. Annually, Fire Department needs would be assessed, and budget allocations revised accordingly to ensure that adequate levels of service are maintained throughout the City. The proposed project would contribute to the funding of fire services over an extended period, through an 9 City of Anaheim. 2021. Anaheim Fiscal Year 2020‐2021 Adopted Budget. Available at https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/32083/20‐21‐Proposed‐Budget‐Book, Accessed February 18, 2022. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 16 increase in tax revenue relative to the project site’s increase in development intensity. Additionally, building plans submitted for new development on the project site would be required to comply with fire safety requirements. Police Services The Anaheim Police Department provides police protection and law enforcement services throughout the City. The Police Department provides emergency police response, nonemergency police response, routine police patrol, traffic violation enforcement, traffic accident investigation, animal control, and parking code enforcement. The Police Department headquarters is located at 425 South Harbor Boulevard, approximately 0.75 mile east of the project site. The Police Department operates 4 police stations and employs more than 400 sworn police personnel.10 The proposed project is not a typical land use which would result in population growth, and therefore substantially increase demand for services. Further, the proposed project is consistent with the City’s General Plan and zoning, meaning that future development and buildout on the project site has already been considered in previous planning documents. The Police Department would review the proposed project during the plan check process to ensure that adequate lighting, safety and security features are included in the proposed project design. The proposed project does not propose, and would not create a need for, new/physically altered police protection facilities to maintain acceptable service ratios/response times. Schools The proposed land use is not a typical land use associated with population growth, and would not generate new students. Nevertheless, the proposed project would be subject to payment of school impact fees in accordance with SB 50. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65995(h), “The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed …are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization …on the provision of adequate school facilities.” The applicant would pay developer fees in compliance with the established regulatory framework to support provision of adequate school services. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with such facilities. Libraries The Anaheim Public Library system provides library services to the City. The proposed project is a public use, supporting ATN operations and maintenance. The proposed project is a not a land use which would generate increased demand for liberty services. Therefore, no impact would occur. Solid Waste Republic Services, a private recycling and non‐hazardous solid waste hauler, provides solid waste services to the City. Republic Services is responsible for all residential, commercial, and industrial waste and recycling services. Solid waste is disposed of in Orange County landfills. Currently, there are three active landfills in the County: Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, Olinda Alpha Landfill in Brea, and Prima 10 Anaheim Police Department. (2021). Command Staff. Available at: http://www.anaheim.net/172/Command‐Staff, Accessed February 18, 2022. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 17 Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. Table 7: Orange County Landfill Capacities provides capacity details for each of the County landfills. Table 7: Orange County Landfill Capacities Landfill Maximum Daily Permitted Tonnage (tons per day) Maximum Permitted Capacity (Cubic Feet) Remaining Capacity Frank R. Bowerman 11,500 266,000,000 205,000,000 Olinda Alpha 8,000 148,800,000 34,200,000 Prima Deshecha 4,000 172,900,000 134,300,000 Source: CalRecycle. Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), 2022. Based on a generation rate of 6 pounds (lbs)/1,000 sf/day for office uses, the proposed project would generate approximately 110 pounds per day of solid waste.11 The proposed project’s projected solid waste generation would account for less than one percent of the overall daily capacity of the County landfills. Existing landfills have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project and solid waste generated during construction and operations would represent a nominal increase compared to the daily permitted tonnage at landfills. Compliance with all applicable regulations and laws regarding solid waste would further reduce disposal in landfills. Parks The proposed project is not a residential land use, and is not a land use typically associated with demand for parkland. The project proposes a bus maintenance facility with administrative offices and bus wash. No impacts to parkland would occur. Utility and Public Services Conclusion. Project implementation would not result in any significant impacts to utilities or public services. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant effects that would preclude the use of a Categorical Exemption as set forth in Section 15332(d) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Exceptions to Exemptions Even if a project may be exempt under any of the potential categorical exemptions, State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides specific instances where exceptions to otherwise applicable exemptions apply. The following text addresses each exception as it relates to the proposed Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility Project. A. Location. The exception states, “Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. A project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.” 11 CalRecyle. 2006. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates: Residential Sector Generation Rates. Available at https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. Accessed March 17, 2022. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 18 This exception applies only to CEQA exemptions under Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11. The proposed project is pursuing an exemption under Class 32 In‐Fill Development Projects; therefore, this exception is not applicable. Further, the project site is in an urbanized area and has no natural features. B. Cumulative Impact. This exception states, “All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time, is significant.” The proposed project is limited to the construction of a bus maintenance facility with administrative offices and bus wash. Project operations would allow ATN to operate electric buses for transit operations, therefore decreasing the level of environmental impacts compared to the existing bus fleet. The proposed project would be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would include construction and operation of the bus maintenance facility with administrative offices. Phase 2 would only include construction and operation of the bus wash facility. The proposed project is not part of a larger phased master plan development that would result in successive projects; therefore, the proposed project would not result in cumulative impacts from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. C. Significant Impact. The exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” The proposed project is an infill development. There are no activities associated with the proposed project that would cause a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. D. Scenic Highways. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.” The California Department of Transportation State Scenic Highway System Map depicts locations and status of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways. According to the map, the project site is not located on or near an officially designated scenic highway.12 The nearest designated scenic highway is the Riverside Freeway (CA‐91) located six miles northeast of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impacts on an officially designated scenic highway. E. Hazardous Waste Sites. This exception states, “A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Government Code Section 65962.5 refers specifically to a list of hazardous waste facilities compiled by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). Two hazardous waste sites listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 are located near the project site: 12 California Department of Transportation. (20118). California State Scenic Highway System Map, Available at: https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa, Accessed March 2, 2022. Anaheim Transportation Network Bus Maintenance Facility CEQA Categorical Exemption 19  Import Auto Supply, at 110 North Manchester Avenue: leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site; gasoline release affected soil; case closed 1996.  Import Auto Facility, 101 North Manchester Avenue: LUST site, diesel release affected soil; case closed 1995. Both hazardous waste sites have been closed for more than 20 years, and do not pose a concern for the proposed project. Therefore, no impacts would occur. F. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project site does not include any structures identified in the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources and is not within the City of Anaheim’s four historic districts. There are no existing structures on the project site. A site‐specific cultural resources study was prepared for the proposed project (Attachment D). Furthermore, the pedestrian assessment and the SCCIC records search results indicate there are no recoded prehistoric or historical resources on or near the project site. Therefore, no impacts to historical resources would occur. DETERMINATION I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following each question and that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as infill development meeting the conditions of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date Printed Name, Title Phone Number March 22, 2022 Andy Uk, Associate Planner 714-765-5238 I RETAIL I AUTO SALVAGE YARD I INDUSTRIAL I RAILROAD RS-3 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE I RETAIL I SELF STORAGE FACILITY I SELF STORAGE FACILITY I AUTO REPAIR/ SERVICE I INDUSTRIAL I AUTO REPAIR/ SERVICE I INDUSTRIAL I VACANT C-G VACANT RS-2 SFR RS-2 DUPLEX RS-2 APTS 12 DU RM-4 APTS 10 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU C-G OFFICES C-G RESTAURANT I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I SELF STORAGE FACILITY I SELF STORAGE FACILITY C-G DEV 2021-00094 VACANT C-G VACANT 5 F R E E W A Y 5 F R E E W A Y W LINCOLN AVE S M A N C H E S T E R A V E W BROADWAY N M A N C H E S T E R A V E W LINCOLN AVE N WILSHIRE AVE W M A B L E S T S CHERRY ST W CENTER ST W. S. EUCLID ST W. BROADW A Y W. LINCOLN AVE S. WALNUT STN. HARBOR BLVDN.EUCLIDSTN. LOARA STS. HARBOR BLVDS. ANAHE IM BLVD W. B R O A D W A Y S. ANAHE IM BLVD 100 South Manchester Avenue DEV No. 2021-00094 Subject Property APN: 250-132-09 250-132-13 250-132-10 250-132-07 250-132-16 250-132-15 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT 8 5 F R E E W A Y 5 F R E E W A Y W LINCOLN AVE S M A N C H E S T E R A V E W BROADWAY N M A N C H E S T E R A V E W LINCOLN AVE N M A N C H E S T E R A V E N WILSHIRE AVE W M A B L E S T S CHERRY STS ADAMS ST W. S. EUCLID ST W. BROADW A Y W. LINCOLN AVE S. WALNUT STN. HARBOR BLVDN.EUCLIDSTN. LOARA STS. HARBOR BLVDS. ANAHE IM BLVD W. B R O A D W A Y S. ANAHE IM BLVD 100 South Manchester Avenue DEV No. 2021-00094 Subject Property APN: 250-132-09 250-132-13 250-132-10 250-132-07 250-132-16 250-132-15 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT 7