Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 2020/04/27
City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, April 27, 2020 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Michelle Lieberman • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Kimberly Keys • Commissioners: John Armstrong, Natalie Meeks, Rosa Mulleady, Dave Vadodaria, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Consent Calendar • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment SPECIAL NOTICE DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC On March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act- related provisions of Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20, please be advised that Planning Commission members will participate in this meeting remotely. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 and given the current health concerns, members of the public can access the meeting live on-line, with audio and limited video, at www.anaheim.net/planning. In addition, members of the public can submit comments electronically for Planning Commission consideration by sending them to planningcommission@anaheim.net or directly to the project planner as indicated on each item below. To ensure distribution to the Planning Commission prior to consideration of the agenda, please submit comments prior to 3:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Those comments, as well as any comments received after 3:00 p.m., will be distributed to the Planning Commission members and will be made part of the official public record of the meeting. Contact the Planning and Building Department at 714-765-5139, the project planner listed below, or planningcommission@anaheim.net with any questions. A copy of the staff report may be obtained on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, April 23, 2020, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection by contacting the Building and Planning Department at 714-765-5139 or planningcommission@anaheim.net during regular business hours. 04-27-2020 Page 2 of 8 ACCESSIBILITY: If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, in order to observe and/or offer public comment may request such reasonable modification, accommodation, aid, or service by contacting the Building and Planning Department at 714-765-5139 or planningcommission@anaheim.net, no later than 8:00 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting. APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. 04-27-2020 Page 3 of 8 Consent Calendar There will be no separate discussion on the item prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Reports and Recommendations ITEM NO. 1A MISCELLEANOUS CASE NO. 2020-00732 (DEV2020-00082) Location: Citywide Request: This is a City-initiated request for City Council approval of Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Thresholds. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15060(c)(3), in that the activity is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and, even if it is determined to be a project, it would be Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15308, Class 8 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment). Motion Project Planner: Susan Kim skim@anaheim.net 04-27-2020 Page 4 of 8 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 (DEV2020-00038) Location: 1045 North Armando Street, Unit E Request: The applicant requests approval to permit a homebrewing retail supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building (Windsor Homebrew Supply). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 (DEV2018-00008) Location: 4900 East La Palma Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval to permit and retain an indoor softball training facility within an existing industrial building (Softball Performance Workshop). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net 04-27-2020 Page 5 of 8 ITEM NO. 4 VARIANCE NO. 2019-05127 (DEV2019-00144) Location: 3430 West Lincoln Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of a variance to permit a wall sign which exceeds the maximum sign area allowed by the Municipal Code in conjunction with an existing retail store. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15311, Class 11 (Accessory Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Jose Barriga JBarriga@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2019-128 (DEV2019-00054) Location: 1150-1178 Knollwood Circle and 2621-2651 Woodland Drive Request: The applicant requests approval of a tentative parcel map to establish a 1-lot, 31-unit commercial airspace condominium subdivision for an existing business park. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15315, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Peter Lange PLange@anaheim.net 04-27-2020 Page 6 of 8 ITEM NO. 6 VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 (DEV2019-00066) Location: 1325 South Euclid Street Request: The applicant requests approval of a variance to permit a front landscape and structural setback less than permitted by the Municipal Code to permit the construction of a 3,853 square foot one-story office building. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Peter Lange PLange@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06056 VARIANCE NO. 2020-05138 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00152 (DEV2019-00160) Location: 2790 West Lincoln Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of the following zoning entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to demolish an existing commercial building and construct a new service station with a convenience store; (ii) a variance to permit reduced front and interior landscaped setbacks and maximum building height adjacent to a residential zone, and (iii) an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with the convenience store. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures).* *This item was advertised as being categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development Projects). Request for a continuance to the June 8, 2020 meeting Project Planner: Jose Barriga JBarriga@anaheim.net This item was continued from the April 13, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. 04-27-2020 Page 7 of 8 ITEM NO. 8 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979 (DEV2017-00128) Location: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements to allow construction of a four-story mixed-use development that consists of 315 apartment units, a 2,031 square-foot leasing office for the apartment units and 3,413 square-foot retail space with 639 on-site parking spaces (636 spaces in a parking structure and 3 surface spaces): (i) a General Plan Amendment to amend the General Plan land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High; (ii) a Zoning Reclassification to apply the Mixed-Use (MU) Overlay Zone to the existing C-G (General Commercial) Zone; (iii) a conditional use permit to allow a mixed-use development with modified standards; and (iv) a Development Agreement to permit a voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs (i.e. Senior Safety Net Program). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Joanne Hwang jhwang@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 9 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2019-00168 (DEV2019-00174) Location: Citywide Request: A City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to modify Chapter 18.52 (Density Bonuses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to reflect recent changes to the State Density Bonus Law. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15060(c)(2) and 15061(b)(3), in that the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment. This item was continued from the April 13, 2020 Planning Commission meeting. Motion Project Planner: Joanne Hwang jhwang@anaheim.net 04-27-2020 Page 8 of 8 Adjourn to Monday, May 11 , 2020 at 5:00 p.m. CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 5:00 p.m. April 22, 2020 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1A PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2020-00732 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ANALYSIS AND VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Anaheim REQUEST: City Council adoption of Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Thresholds of Significance. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that this action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per Section 115060(c)(3), 15378, and 15308 of the CEQA Guidelines; and, recommend City Council approval of the attached TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis and Draft City Council Resolution to adopt VMT Thresholds of Significance. BACKGROUND: CEQA generally requires state and local government agencies, referred to as lead agencies, to inform decision makers and the public about the potential environmental impacts of proposed projects, and to reduce those environmental impacts to the extent feasible. Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed by the Governor in 2013, changed the way local jurisdictions identify transportation impacts pursuant to CEQA. Specifically, this legislation has directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a CEQA impact. OPR released the final guidelines for these transportation metrics in December 2018. The guidelines identified VMT as the preferred metric moving forward and stated that a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA Guidelines in December of 2018. The Planning Commission received a workshop on these changes on January 22, 2020. Section 15064.3 (Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts) of the CEQA Guidelines provides criteria for analyzing transportation impacts and identifies that, by July of 2020, all lead agencies must use VMT as the new transportation metric for identifying such impacts. Section 15064.7 (Thresholds of Significance) of the CEQA Guidelines provides guidance on adopting thresholds of significance for analyzing project impacts. MISCELLANEOUS NO. 2020-00732 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 4 The City of Anaheim has adopted vehicle Level of Service policies (i.e. acceptable degrees of traffic congestion). These policies set standards for which local transportation infrastructure will strive to maintain. These policies are contained in the City of Anaheim General Plan. The City will continue to use these policies in relation to potential changes in land use and transportation infrastructure; however, pursuant to the State’s guidance on the implementation of SB 743, the analysis of Level of Service will no longer be a part of CEQA analysis. PROPOSAL: City staff, in consultation with Fehr and Peers, has prepared the attached TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis (Attachment 1) to outline the specific steps for complying with the new CEQA requirements for VMT analysis. Staff is recommending that Council authorize the Public Works Director and/or his/her designee to revise the TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis, on an as needed basis subsequent to the adoption of the guidelines. The TIA guidelines for CEQA Analysis document includes the following proposed VMT Thresholds of Significance, which staff is recommending for approval of through the attached Draft City Council Resolution (Attachment 2). 1. A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if the baseline project-generated or cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population 2. The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if the baseline or cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus projects condition compared to the no project condition Changes to the proposed VMT Thresholds of Significance would require amendment by City Council resolution. ANALYSIS: The following analysis of the CEQA requirements for determining the significance of transportation impacts and determining thresholds of significance supports the proposed TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis and VMT Thresholds of Significance. Section 15064.3 (Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts) of the CEQA Guidelines describes specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. This section states that the lead agency should use the following criteria for analyzing transportation impacts for development/land use projects. 1. Determining Significant Impacts. Vehicle miles traveled exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally, the lead agency can presume that projects within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high quality transit corridor cause a less than significant transportation impact. The lead agency can also presume that projects that decrease vehicle miles traveled in the project area compared to existing conditions would also have a less than significant transportation impact. 2. Qualitative Analysis. If existing models or methods are not available to estimate the vehicle miles traveled for the particular project, the lead agency may analyze the project’s vehicle miles traveled qualitatively. Such a qualitative analysis would evaluate factors such as the availability of transit, proximity to other destinations, etc. For many projects, a qualitative analysis of construction traffic may be appropriate. MISCELLANEOUS NO. 2020-00732 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 4 3. Methodology. A lead agency has discretion to choose the most appropriate methodology to evaluate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, including whether to express the change in absolute terms, per capita, per household or in any other measure. A lead agency may use models to estimate a project’s vehicle miles traveled, and may revise those estimates to reflect professional judgment based on substantial evidence. The lead agency should document any assumptions used to estimate vehicle miles traveled and any revisions to model outputs in the environmental document prepared for the project. Section 15064.7 (Thresholds of Significance) of the CEQA Guidelines defines a threshold of significance as an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant. CEQA encourages each public agency to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case-by-case basis. The proposed TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis and VMT Thresholds of Significance have been prepared pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. The proposed guidelines outline the specific steps for complying with the CEQA requirements for VMT analysis. A TIA for VMT assessment is required for any project that does not satisfy the following identified project screening criteria, described in detail in the guidelines document: • Transit Priority Areas Screening • Low VMT-generating Areas Screening • Project Type Screening In cases where insufficient information is available to make a preliminary assessment of a proposal’s effect on traffic, the City Traffic Engineer shall determine, at his/her discretion, whether a TIA will be required. The TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis require the TIA to be prepared using one of the City’s transportation planning on-call consultants or another certified transportation professional with documented experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project under the following scenarios: 1. Baseline conditions - This scenario is consistent with traffic model baseline conditions 2. Baseline plus project - This scenario includes the proposed project’s land use in base year model runs 3. Cumulative no project - This scenario is consistent with future traffic model conditions 4. Cumulative plus project - This scenario includes the proposed project’s land use in future year model runs MISCELLANEOUS NO. 2020-00732 April 27, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Both “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize two types of VMT: 1. Project generated VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the thresholds of significance, and 2. The project’s effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at Citywide VMT per service population comparing it to the no project condition. The VMT thresholds to determine potential VMT impacts are below: 1. A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if the baseline project-generated or cumulative project-generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population; and, 2. The project’s effect on VMT would be significant if the baseline or cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition. To mitigate VMT impacts, the following choices are available to the applicant: 1. Modify the project’s built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project; and, 2. Implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT generated by the project. Because the CEQA Guidelines are periodically updated and/or legal opinions may change how analysis is completed, staff is recommending that the City Council approve the proposed guidelines and authorize the Public Works Director and/or his/her designee to continually review and revise these guidelines for applicability, on an as needed basis. Staff is recommending City Council approval of the proposed VMT Thresholds by resolution, consistent with the CEQA Guidelines; modifications to the VMT thresholds would require City Council approval of a subsequent resolution. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the proposed action to recommend City Council adoption of Proposed Traffic Analysis Guidelines for CEQA Analysis is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15060(c)(3). The request is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and, even if it were determined to be a project, it would be Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15308, Class 8 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment). CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Council adopt the proposed Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for CEQA Analysis, in accordance with State law. Prepared and submitted by, Concurred by, Susan Kim Rafael Cobian Principal Planner City Traffic Engineer Attachments: 1. Proposed TIA Guidelines for CEQA Analysis 2. Draft City Council Resolution 1 DRAFT City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis April 2020 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 2 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Background Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Level of Service (LOS) Standards and General Plan Consistency .............................................................. 4 CEQA Changes ................................................................................................................................................. 4 When is a TIA Required? 4 CEQA Assessment ‐ VMT Analysis 5 Analysis Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Project Screening ..................................................................................................................................... 5 VMT Assessment for Non‐Screened Development .................................................................................. 8 CEQA VMT Impact Thresholds ......................................................................................................................... 9 VMT Mitigation Measures ............................................................................................................................... 9 Transportation Impact Study Format ............................................................................................................ 10 VMT Assessment Requirements ............................................................................................................ 10 CEQA Assessment ‐ Active Transportation and Public Transit Analysis 10 Attachments 12 A. Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) in Anaheim .................................................................................................. 12 B. Low VMT‐Generating Areas in Anaheim ................................................................................................... 13 C. Detailed VMT Forecasting Information ..................................................................................................... 14 VMT Forecasting Instructions ................................................................................................................ 14 Appropriateness Checks ......................................................................................................................... 15 VMT Assessment Modeling Scenarios ................................................................................................... 15 DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines April 2020 3 INTRODUCTION State and Federal laws require the correlation of Land Use Element building intensities in a General Plan with the Circulation Element capacity. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required by the City of Anaheim so that the impact of land use proposals on the existing and future circulation system can be adequately assessed and to ensure that the California Environmental Qualities Act (CEQA) and Congestion Management Program laws and guidelines are met. The following TIA requirements are intended for any person or entity who is proposing development in the City of Anaheim and should be used in coordination with the CEQA Guidelines and Anaheim Municipal Code to guide the development review process. For the past several decades, the preparation of a TIA was integrated into the CEQA process, in which the TIA was used primarily to analyze a project’s impacts under CEQA. However, with the passage of Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), changes to the TIA process are necessary. Specifically, a TIA may be needed as a stand‐ alone document which is a requirement of project approval and will include information for the decision makers that is not required as part of the CEQA process. The purpose of TIA Guidelines is to provide general instructions for analyzing the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects. These guidelines present the recommended format and methodology that should generally be utilized in the preparation of TIAs for CEQA analysis. BACKGROUND INFORMATION SB 743, signed by the Governor in 2013, is changing the way transportation impacts are identified. Specifically, the legislation has directed the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) to look at different metrics for identifying transportation as a CEQA impact. The Final OPR guidelines were released in December 2018 and identified Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) as the preferred metric moving forward. The Natural Resources Agency completed the rule making process to modify the CEQA guidelines in December of 2018. The CEQA Guidelines identify that, by July of 2020 all lead agencies must use VMT as the new transportation metric for identifying impacts for land use project. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b) below, lead agencies are encouraged to formally adopt their significance thresholds, and this is key part of the SB 743 implementation process. (b) Each public agency is encouraged to develop and publish thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. Thresholds of significance to be adopted for general use as part of the lead agency’s environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation, and developed through a public review process and be supported by substantial evidence. Lead agencies may also use thresholds on a case‐by‐case basis as provided in Section 15064(b)(2). To complement the previous work, the City of Anaheim has produced these TIA Guidelines to outline the specific steps for complying with the new CEQA expectations for VMT analysis. It should be noted that CEQA requirements change as the CEQA Guidelines are periodically updated and/or legal opinions are rendered that change how analysis is completed. As such, the City of Anaheim will DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 4 continually review these guidelines for applicability and consultants should contact the City to ensure that they are applying the most recent guidelines for project impact assessment. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The City of Anaheim has adopted vehicle LOS policies that set standards for which local infrastructure will strive to maintain. These policies are contained in the City of Anaheim General Plan and therefore apply to discretionary approvals of new land use and transportation projects. Therefore, a vehicle LOS analysis may be required, consistent with the General Plan requirements. The City Traffic Engineer reserves the right to request VMT analysis, LOS analysis, or both in a traffic study for any proposed project. Site specific traffic studies analyzing site access and LOS must be scoped with the City Traffic Engineer per the requirements outlined in the most recent City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. CEQA CHANGES Since the last TIA Guidelines update, SB 743 was signed into law. A key element of this law is the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts under CEQA. This change is intended to assist in balancing the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. SB 743 contains amendments to current congestion management law that allows cities and counties to effectively opt‐out of the LOS standards that would otherwise apply in areas where Congestion Management Plans (CMPs) are still used (including Orange County). Further, SB 743 required the Governor’s OPR to update the CEQA Guidelines and establish criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. In December 2018, OPR released their final recommended guidelines based on feedback with the public, public agencies, and various organizations and individuals. OPR recommended VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts for land use projects and land use plans. For transportation projects, lead agencies may select their own preferred metric but must support their decision with substantial evidence that complies with CEQA expectations. SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS outside of CEQA review for other transportation planning or analysis purposes (i.e., general plans, impact fee programs, corridor studies, congestion mitigation, or ongoing network monitoring); but these metrics may no longer constitute the sole basis for CEQA impacts. WHEN IS A TIA REQUIRED? An applicant seeking project approval will submit the proposed project to the Planning Department with a planning and land use approval application. The Planning Department will transmit the application to Traffic Engineering for preliminary review, as part of its interdepartmental coordination process. After a preliminary review of the project by Traffic Engineering, the applicant will be notified by Planning Department in writing within 30 days of the application submittal date as to whether a TIA is required. An application may require a traffic analysis even if it does not require discretionary action if the project meets the minimum thresholds for a TIA. The TIA should consider deficiencies in LOS and impacts under CEQA on VMT. All requirements for TIA’s analyzing LOS can be found in most recent City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 5 Studies and should be verified with the City Traffic Engineer. This document focuses on VMT analysis for CEQA requirements only. A TIA with VMT assessment shall be required for a proposed project that does not satisfy the identified project screening criteria: Transit Priority Areas Screening Low VMT‐generating Areas Screening Project Type Screening See below for details on this screening criteria. Projects may be screened from VMT analysis and require level‐of‐service analysis, or vice‐versa. In cases where insufficient information is available to make a preliminary assessment of a proposal’s effect on traffic, the City Traffic Engineer shall determine, at their discretion, whether a TIA will be required. A TIA must be prepared using one of the City’s transportation planning on‐call consultants or other certified transportation professional with documented experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. The TIA shall be submitted to the Traffic Engineering Division in a draft form. Comments relative to the analysis shall be provided by the City Traffic Engineer, or their designee, in writing to the project proponent and their engineer so that any necessary revisions can be made prior to final submittal. The TIA is not deemed complete or final until it incorporates all necessary revisions and is prepared to the City’s satisfaction. CEQA ASSESSMENT ‐ VMT ANALYSIS A key element of SB 743, signed in 2013, is the elimination of automobile delay and LOS as the sole basis of determining CEQA impacts. The most recent CEQA guidelines, released in December 2018, recommend VMT as the most appropriate measure of project transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does not prevent a city or county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS as part of other plans (i.e., the general plan), studies, or ongoing network monitoring. The following recommendations assist in determining VMT impact thresholds and mitigation requirements for various land use projects’ TIAs. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY For purposes of SB 743 compliance, a VMT analysis should be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the Traffic Division and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population (e.g. population plus employment) compared to the County of Orange boundary. Normalizing VMT per service population provides a transportation efficiency metric that the analysis is based on. Using this efficiency metric allows the user to compare the project to the remainder of the County for purposes of identifying transportation impacts. PROJECT SCREENING There are three types of project screening that lead agencies can apply to effectively screen projects from project‐level assessment. The project only needs to fulfill one of the screening types below to qualify for screening. These screening steps are summarized below: DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 6 Type 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening Projects located within a TPA1 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project: 1. Has a total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75; 2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking); 3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or 4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate‐ or high‐income residential units. To identify if the project is in a TPA, the analyst shall refer to Attachment A which provides a map of TPAs in Anaheim. Note that this map shall update from time to time. The City does not control bus frequencies, so this map may update as OCTA changes their service patterns over time. Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening Residential and office projects located within a low VMT‐generating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Other employment‐related and mixed‐ use projects within a low VMT‐generating area may also be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the project can reasonably be expected to generate VMT per service population similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project land uses would alter the existing built environment in such a way as to increase the rate or length of vehicle trips. For this screening in Anaheim, the OCTAM travel forecasting model was used to measure VMT performance for individual traffic analysis zones (TAZs). TAZs are geographic polygons, typically bound by arterial streets or other geographical barriers, that are modeled as areas of homogenous travel behavior. Total daily VMT per service population (population plus employment) was estimated for each TAZ in Orange County. To identify if the project is in a low VMT‐generating area, the analyst shall refer to Attachment B which provides a map of low VMT‐generating zones in Anaheim as compared to the County 2 . A low VMT‐ generating area produces VMT per service population that is 15% below the County average. Additionally, as noted above, the analyst must identify if the project is consistent with the existing land use within that 1 A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high‐quality transit corridor per the definitions below. Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 ‐ ‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 ‐ For purposes of this section, a ‘high‐quality transit corridor’ means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours. 2 Attachment B was created with outputs from the Base Year (2012) OCTAM Version 4 in March of 2020. As OCTA updates OCTAM versions, this attachment should be periodically updated to represent the latest information. DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 7 TAZ and use professional judgement that there is nothing unique about the project that would otherwise be mis‐represented utilizing the data from the travel demand model. Type 3: Project Type Screening Some project types are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature. Local serving retail generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel. The following uses can be screened from project‐level assessment as they are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature: Local‐serving K‐12 schools Pocket, neighborhood and community parks as defined by the General Plan Day care centers Local‐serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet3,4, including: o Alcoholic Beverage Sales (Off‐Sale and On‐Sale) o Animal‐Grooming and Animal‐Boarding o Automotive Washing o Automotive‐Parts Sales o Automotive‐Repair and Modification (Major and Minor) o Automotive‐Service Stations o Business & Financial Services o Commercial Retail Centers (Large and Small) o Computer Internet & Amusement Facilities o Convenience Stores o Dance & Fitness Studios (Large and Small) o Drive‐Through Facilities o Equipment Rental (Large and Small) o Group Care Facilities o Gym o Markets (Large and Small) o Personal Services‐General o Plant Nurseries o Restaurants (Full Service, General and Outdoor dining) o Retail Sales (General, Kiosks, Outdoor and Used Merchandise) o Self‐Storage o Wine Bar 3 The City of Anaheim may require a full VMT assessment if discretionary action is required. 4 Typically uses consistent with Anaheim Municipal Code 18.36.040 Non‐Residential Primary Use Classes. Uses may be excluded and/or other uses may be included as determined by the Planning and Building Director. DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 8 Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses Community and Religious Assembly Uses Public Services Local‐serving community colleges that are consistent with the assumptions noted in the RTP/SCS Affordable or supportive housing Convalescent & Rest Homes Senior housing (as defined by HUD) Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips5 VMT ASSESSMENT FOR NON‐SCREENED DEVELOPMENT Projects not screened through the steps above shall complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the OCTAM model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact. This analysis should include ‘project generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project TAZ (or TAZs) under the following scenarios: Baseline conditions ‐ This scenario is consistent with OCTAM baseline conditions Baseline plus project ‐ This scenario includes the project land use in OCTAM base year model runs Cumulative no project ‐ This scenario is consistent with OCTAM future model conditions Cumulative plus project ‐ This scenario includes the project land use in OCTAM future year model runs The model output should include total VMT, which includes all vehicle trips and trip purposes, and VMT per service population (population plus employment). Total VMT (by speed bin) is needed as an input for air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), and energy impact analysis while total VMT per service population is recommended for transportation impact analysis. Both “plus project” scenarios noted above will summarize two types of VMT: (1) project‐generated VMT per service population and comparing it back to the appropriate benchmark noted in the thresholds of significance, and (2) the project effect on VMT, comparing how the project changes VMT on the network looking at Citywide VMT per service population comparing it to the no project condition. Project‐generated VMT shall be extracted from the travel demand forecasting model using the origin‐ destination trip matrix and shall multiply that matrix by the final assignment skims. The project‐effect on 5 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110‐124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact. DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 9 VMT shall be estimated using the City boundary and extracting the total link‐level VMT for both the no project and with project condition. A detailed description of this process is included with these guidelines as Attachment C. CEQA VMT IMPACT THRESHOLDS VMT thresholds to determine potential VMT impacts is provided below. 1. A project would result in a significant project‐generated VMT impact if the baseline project‐ generated or cumulative project‐generated VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population 2. The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if the baseline or cumulative link‐ level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition Please note that the cumulative no project shall reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than significant subject to consideration of other substantial evidence. VMT MITIGATION MEASURES To mitigate VMT impacts, the following choices are available to the applicant: 1. Modify the project’s built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project 2. Implement transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to reduce VMT generated by the project As part of the City SB 743 Implementation Study, key TDM measures that are appropriate to the region were identified. Measures appropriate for most of the City of Anaheim are summarized in Appendix B of the SB 743 Implementation Mitigation and TDM Strategy Assessment Memorandum. Evaluation of VMT reductions should be evaluated using state‐of‐the‐practice methodologies recognizing that many of the TDM strategies are dependent on building tenant performance over time. The City of Anaheim requires developers and the business community to assist in reducing peak hour and total vehicular trips by implementing Transportation Demand Management Plans (TDMs). The potential of a proposed project to reduce traffic through the use of a TDM plan should be addressed in the traffic study. This plan is in addition to Regulation 15 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. If a TDM plan is proposed as a mitigation measure for a project, and the traffic study attributes a reduction in peak and total traffic to the TDM plan, the following information must be provided: 1. A detailed description of the major components of the TDM plan and how it would be implemented and maintained on a continuing basis 2. Case studies or empirical data that supports the anticipated reduction of traffic attributed to the TDM plan DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 10 3. Additional Volume/Capacity ratio calculations that illustrate the circulation benefits of the TDM plan 4. How it complies with the South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORMAT Prior to the beginning of any study, the project proponent shall coordinate with Planning Department staff and Traffic Engineering staff. A tentative schedule for reviewing and processing the TIA will be developed. Initial discussions shall also include a conversation of any key issues along with the development scope and boundaries of the study area. The proponent will submit a detailed site plan at this meeting. City staff will provide input into the following specific areas of the analysis: Defining the general study area boundaries Project access Approved development in the vicinity of the project for cumulative analysis Appropriate Trip Generation rates for the project The project proponent shall coordinate with the Traffic Engineering staff so that detailed and technical aspects of the analysis can be discussed prior to a formal submittal. Topics of discussion will include: Potential for project level VMT screening VMT Analysis assumptions Inclusion of a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM) to mitigate traffic impacts and promote the use of alternate modes of transportation Any specific issues that require special consideration such as pedestrian circulation, access, parking and on‐site circulation Potential of LOS traffic analysis The content and level of analysis necessary to evaluate a project will vary and are dependent on the scope of lane use proposal and location within the City. VMT ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS Present the Project VMT per service population (population and employment) for all analysis scenarios and the Project effect on VMT for all analysis scenarios. Data should be presented in tabular format. If the project meets the criteria for screening from project‐generated VMT analysis, this should be documented. All VMT impacts should be identified in accordance with the VMT Impact Thresholds described above. Proposed VMT mitigation measures should be identified. CEQA ASSESSMENT ‐ ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC TRANSIT ANALYSIS Potential impacts to public transit, pedestrian facilities and travel, and bicycle facilities and travel can be evaluated using the following criteria. DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 11 A significant impact occurs if the project conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance6 or safety of such facilities. Therefore, the TIA should include analysis of a project to examine if it is inconsistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding active transportation or public transit facilities, or otherwise decreases the performance or safety of such facilities and make a determination as to whether it has the potential to conflict with existing or proposed facilities supporting these travel modes. 6 Per the OPR Technical Advisory, decrease of performance does not include increase in users. IrvineRanch OS ChinoHills SP Ro s e D r B e a c h B l Garden Grove Bl Cent u r y B l S t a t e C o ll e g e B l Yorba Linda Bl T u s t i n A v Va l l e y V i e w S t Th e C i t y D r i v e S o u t h B e a c h B l 17 th S t W Orangethorpe Av E u c l i d S t Villa P a r k R d S a n t a A n a C a n y o n R d Ea s t I m p er i a l Hw N o r t h H a r b o r B l Westminster Bl Newp o r t A v Trask Av Chapman Av Ha r b o r B l La Palm a A v Ka t e l la A v OrangethorpeAv No r t h M a i n S t So u t h B r o o k h u r s t S t So E s p e r a n z a R d No r t h C a n n o n S t L a M i r a d a B l So u t h N e w p o r t B l ImperialHw K n o t t S t Ja m b o r e e R d South W eirC a n y o n R d East Chapman Av ·142 ·261 ·241 ∙91 ∙55 ∙57 ∙22 ∙90 ∙39 %&405 !"5 Transit Priority Areas (TPAs) in Anaheim Attachment A Anaheim Metrolink Stations HQT Bus Stops Buffer(0.5 mile) An a h e i m B l Source: OCTA, March, 2020, http://www.octa.net/Bus/Routes-and-Schedules/Overview/ IrvineRanch OS SantaAna RiverTrail ChinoHills SP ·261 ·142 ·241 ∙91 ∙55 ∙57 ∙22 ∙39 ∙90 %&405 !"5 Attachment B Daily VMT per Service Population in Anaheim TAZs as Compared to the Orange County Average (2012) Anaheim City No Service Population < -15% below the Orange County Average 0 to -15% below the Orange County Average Higher than the Orange County Average Source: OCTAM Version 4, Base Year (2012), March, 2020 DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 14 C. DETAILED VMT FORECASTING INFORMATION This section provides detailed VMT forecasting instructions for use with the OCTAM travel demand forecasting model. Please note that OCTA periodically updates OCTAM and the latest version available should be utilized for VMT assessment in the City of Anaheim. OCTA is also in the development of a VMT estimation tool for OCTAM. Upon completion of the tool, it should be reviewed for appropriateness for CEQA compliance before use on a City of Anaheim project. OCTAM is a trip‐based model that generates daily person trip‐ends for each TAZ across various trip purposes (Home‐based‐work, home‐based‐other, and non‐home‐based for example) based on population, household, and employment variables. This may create challenges for complying with the VMT guidance because trip generation is not directly tied to specific land use categories. The following methodology addresses this particular challenge among others. Production and attraction trip‐ends are separately calculated for each zone, and generally: production trip‐ ends are generated by residential land uses and attraction trip‐ends are generated by non‐residential land uses. Focusing on residential and employment land uses, the first step to forecasting VMT requires translating the land use into model terms, the closest approximations are: Residential: home‐based production trips Employment: home‐based work attraction trips Note that this excludes all non‐home‐based trips including work‐based other and other‐based other trips. The challenges with computing VMT for these two types of trips in a trip‐based model are 1) production and attraction trip‐ends are not distinguishable after the PA to OD conversion process and 2) trip purposes are not maintained after the mode choice step. For these reasons, it not possible to use the VMT results from the standard vehicle assignment (even using a select zone re‐assignment). A separate post‐process must be developed to re‐estimate VMT for each zone that includes trip‐end types and trip purposes. In order to provide the most accurate estimates possible, Anaheim’s recommended approach to estimating VMT is outlined below. Deviating from this approach will require justification and approval from the City Traffic Engineer. VMT FORECASTING INSTRUCTIONS This approach will calculate total Origin/Destination (OD) VMT using standard OCTAM model output files. The OD method for calculating total VMT includes all vehicle trips that start in a specific traffic analysis zone, and all vehicle trips that end in a specific traffic analysis zone. The major steps of this approach are listed as follows: Re‐skim final loaded congested networks and adjust the external skim for each mode and time period to account for truncated trips Multiply appropriate distance skim matrices by OD trip matrices to estimate VMT by time period Sum matrices by time period and mode to calculate daily automobile VMT Calculate automobile VMT for individual TAZs DRAFT City of Anaheim TIA Guidelines for CEQA April 2020 15 APPROPRIATENESS CHECKS The number of vehicle trips from the total VMT estimation should match as closely as possible with the results from the traditional model process. The estimated results should be checked against the results from a full model run to understand the degree of accuracy. Note that these custom processes may or may not include full lengths of IX/XI trips (trips with origins or destinations outside of the model roadway network) or special generator trips (airport, seaport, stadium, etc.). When calculating VMT for comparison at the study area, citywide, or regional geography, the same methodology that was used to estimate project‐specific VMT should be used. The VMT for these comparisons can be easily calculated by aggregating the row or column totals for all zones that are within the desired geography. VMT ASSESSMENT MODELING SCENARIOS Projects required to complete VMT analysis and forecasting through the OCTAM model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact should include ‘project generated VMT’ and ‘project effect on VMT’ estimates for the project TAZ (or TAZs) under the following scenarios: Baseline conditions ‐ This data is already available from OCTAM. Baseline plus project ‐ The project land use would be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. A full base year model run would be performed and VMT changes would be isolated for the project TAZ and across the full model network. The model output must include reasonableness checks of the production and attraction balancing to ensure the project effect is accurately captured. If this scenario results in a less‐ than‐significant impact, then additional cumulative scenario analysis may not be required (more information about this outcome can be found in the Thresholds Evaluation discussion later in this chapter). Cumulative no project ‐ This data is available from OCTAM. Cumulative plus project ‐ The project land use would either be added to the project TAZ or a separate TAZ would be created to contain the project land uses. The addition of project land uses should be accompanied by a reallocation of a similar amount of land use from other TAZs; especially if the proposed project is significant in size such that it would change other future developments. Land use projects will generally not change the cumulative no project control totals for population and employment growth. Instead, they will influence the land use supply through changes in general plan land use designations and zoning. If project land uses are simply added to the cumulative no project scenario, then the analysis should reflect this limitation in the methodology and acknowledge that the analysis may overestimate the project’s effect on VMT. RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE FOR PURPOSES OF ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (DEV2020-00082) (MIS2020-00732) WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA Guidelines”) encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable “thresholds of significance” to be used in determining the significance of a project’s environmental effects; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(a) defines a threshold of significance as “an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant”; and WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(b) requires that thresholds of significance used as part of the environmental review process must be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7(c), when adopting thresholds of significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section 21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects; and WHEREAS, in 2018, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) proposed, and the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) – meaning the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project – as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts; and WHEREAS, as a result, automobile delay, as measured by “level of service” (“LOS”) and other similar metrics, will generally no longer constitute a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and ATTACHMENT NO. 2 WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 requires agencies to stop treating automobile delay/LOS as an environmental impact effective on July 1, 2020, though public agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and WHEREAS, City staff, in consultation with Fehr and Peers, has prepared Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for CEQA Analysis (“TIA Guidelines”) to outline the specific steps for complying with CEQA requirements for VMT analysis, which guidelines are on file with the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, the TIA Guidelines include proposed VMT Thresholds of Significance, which staff is recommending for approval by City Council Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine that the approval of the TIA Guidelines and VMT Thresholds of Significance is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) because this approval is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and, even if it were determined to be a project, it is categorically exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15308, Class 8 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council, adopts the following VMT Thresholds of Significance for purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA: 1. A project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if the baseline project-generated or cumulative VMT per service population exceeds 15% below the County of Orange baseline VMT per service population 2. The project’s effect on VMT would be considered significant if the baseline or cumulative link-level boundary Citywide VMT per service population increases under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes and directs City staff to file with the Clerk of the County of Orange a Notice of Exemption in accordance with Section 15062(c)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: ___________________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite No.162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 LOCATION: 1045 North Armando Street, Unit E (Windsor Homebrew Supply) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Scott Windsor and the property owner is Voit La Palma Partners I, LLC. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to permit a homebrewing supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building and an associated determination of public convenience or necessity. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061 and an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151. BACKGROUND: The 5.18-acre property is developed with a commercial and industrial business park. The property is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, DA-7 (Flex) zone. The General Plan designates the property for Non-Residential Mixed-Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include a self-storage facility and industrial uses to the south, industrial uses to the west and north across La Palma Boulevard, and a brewery and industrial uses to the east across Armando Street. Windsor Homebrew Supply is a retail shop in Costa Mesa specializing in selling equipment and ingredients to make beer and wine at home. This location includes a small portion of the store often called a “bottle shop” where customers can purchase bottles of beer and some wine for off-premises consumption. This bottle shop offers rare, unique, and limited release products from breweries that are difficult to find in other stores. These items typically range in price from $10 to $40 per bottle. The majority of the store is dedicated to equipment and ingredients for making beer at home and the bottle shop is an ancillary service to the customer. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAL: Windsor Homebrew Supply proposes to establish a new 1,600 square foot retail store in Anaheim to serve a growing customer base and provide a local store for customers in north Orange County. Similar to the store in Costa Mesa, the applicant is requesting to sell bottles for off-premises consumption, but also add a small tasting area for customers to sample beer and wine at the store. The purpose of the tasting area is to allow customers to try different beers before purchasing bottles and to learn more about the beer making process. This tasting area will function in a manner similar to those found in larger stores like Beverages and More (BevMo) and Whole Foods. The overall sale of beer and wine will constitute approximately 10-15% of gross sales for the shop. The on-premises sales and service will be located in a 300 square foot portion of the shop with a small bar and three seats. The beverages for off-premises consumption will be kept on shelves and in a cooler. The applicant is proposing to be open Monday through Friday from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and on Saturday and Sunday from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The sale of alcoholic beverages for on and off-site consumption requires approval of a conditional use permit in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, DA-7 (Flex) zone to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. The intent of the Flex Area (DA-7) is to provide locations for a wide range of industrial, office and commercial uses. Staff believes that the proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for on and off-site consumption would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses or the growth and development of the area as the property is located in a commercial and industrial flex area and the hours of operation are limited to daytime hours. Additionally, Planning and Building staff in conjunction with the Anaheim Police Department have recommended conditions of approval contained in the attached resolution. These conditions include security measures, prohibition of outdoor consumption, prohibition of any exterior advertising of alcoholic beverages, and a requirement that all employees complete ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Alcohol and Drugs) training. The tasting area will be separated from the rest of the retail store by a 3-4 foot high fencing or other appropriate material. The state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) requires this separation as minors are allowed in the retail portion of the store, but not in the on-premises tasting area. A condition of approval has been included in the draft resolution requiring this separation and signs at the entry indicating that no minors are allowed in the tasting area. The condition also requires signs informing customers that open beverages are not allowed in the retail portion and must remain in the tasting area. The Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan encourages the creation a successful business climate with flexible regulations as well as new food service, restaurants, and retail spaces that serve daytime customers. Staff believes that the addition of Windsor Homebrew Supply would continue to implement the vision of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan and recommends approval of the conditional use permit. Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN): The proposed sale of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption will require issuance of a Type 20 Off Sale Beer and Wine license and a Type 42 On Sale Beer and Wine – Public Premises license from ABC. State law limits the issuance of ABC licenses when a business requests this type of license for a property located in a police-reporting district with a crime rate above the City average, or when there is an over-concentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. However, the law also states that ABC can waive this restriction if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed license would serve a "public convenience or necessity." The location is in Census Tract Number 117.14 which has a population of 499 people. This population allows for zero on-sale licenses and there are presently 11 licenses in the tract. It also allows for zero off-sale licenses and there are presently three licenses in the tract. Attachment 4 to this report includes the ABC License and Reporting District Map that shows the locations of these licenses. This location is also within Police Reporting District 1431 which is below the city average in crime. There have been four calls for service at this location in the last year and they were all burglaries. The ¼-mile radius surrounding this location is 21% above the city average in crime. The calls for service within this area primarily consisted of: 39 petty thefts, 9 drug violations, 8 simple assaults, 8 thefts from vehicles, and 10 vandalisms. The proposed use requires such a determination because of a higher concentration of licenses than allowed in the census tract. Staff believes that the license would serve a convenience or necessity to the customers seeking a specialized market for beer and wine at this new location and recommends approval of this request. Parking: The Municipal Code requires 10 parking spaces for the retail shop and tasting area. The property includes 363 parking spaces shared by the businesses in the business park. A comprehensive analysis of the parking available parking was conducted when a brewery was previously approved in this business park in 2013. At that time, there was a surplus of 78 parking spaces provided on the property beyond what was required by Code. Since that time, a second brewery opened by right in the business park with a parking demand of 13 spaces. The remaining businesses are parked according to Municipal Code requirements. With the previous brewery opening and the proposed Windsor Homebrew Supply, there remains a surplus of 57 spaces beyond what is required by the Municipal Code. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 April 27, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 1, Existing Facilities, Categorical Exemption. Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a request to permit a homebrewing supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building. As such, the proposed project meets the criteria for a Class 1 categorical exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Windsor Homebrew Supply, as conditioned, would operate in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. Staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit and determination of public convenience or necessity. Prepared by, Submitted by, G. Scott Koehm David See Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft CUP and PCN Resolution 2. Police Department Memorandum 3. Applicant’s Letter of Operation/Justification 4. ABC Licenses and Reporting District Map 5. Photos 6. Plans 7. Letters of Support SP 2015-1 DEV 2020-00038 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 VACANT SP 2015-1 DA7 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 BUSINESS PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA7 BUSINESS PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 SELF STORAGE FACILITY SP 2015-1 DA7 BREWERY SP 2015-1 DA7 BREWERY SP 2015-1 DA7 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA7 LA PALMA - KRAEMER BUSINES PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 LA PALMA - KRAEMER BUSINES PARK SP 2015-1 DA1 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 RETAIL SP 2015-1 DA1 RETAIL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 BUSINESS PARK SP 2015-1 DA7 INDUSTRIAL E L A P A L M A A V E N A R M A N D O S T E WHITE STAR AVE N K R A E M E R P L E L A M E S A S T N A R M A N D O S T E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N . B L U E G U M S T N . K R A E M E R B L V D E. LINCOLN AVE N . M I L L E R S T N . S U N K I S T S T N . R I O V I S T A S T 1045 Nort h Armando Street DE V N o. 2020-00038 Subject Property APN: 344-423-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 E L A P A L M A A V E N A R M A N D O S T E WHITE STAR AVE N K R A E M E R P L E L A M E S A S T N A R M A N D O S T E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N . B L U E G U M S T N . K R A E M E R B L V D E. LINCOLN AVE N . M I L L E R S T N . S U N K I S T S T N . R I O V I S T A S T 1045 Nort h Armando Street DE V N o. 2020-00038 Subject Property APN: 344-423-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2020 -*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00038) (1045 NORTH ARMANDO STREET, UNIT E) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit No. 2020- 06061 to permit a homebrewing supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building (Type 20 Off Sale Beer and Wine and Type 42 On Sale Beer and Wine – Public Premises license); and (ii) an associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151 to permit the sale of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption at that certain real property located at 1045 North Armando Street, Unit E in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is on a 5.18-acre commercial lot, which is located within the "MU NR" Non-Residential Mixed-Use land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the “SP-2015-1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Development Area 7 (Flex Area), meaning that the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 Zoning and Development Standards) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151 (collectively, the “Proposed Project”), and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2020 -*** WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit a homebrewing supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building is an allowable use within the “SP-2015-1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Development Area 7 (Flex Area) Zone under subsection .100 of Section 18.120.040 (Uses) of Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the “SP-2015- 1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Development Area 7 (Flex Area) Zone. 2. The Proposed Project would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the use of the property as a retail store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption is compatible with the existing uses within the commercial site and uses in the surrounding area. There are similar uses in the business park and three breweries within the vicinity with similar services. 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with a commercial/industrial building and no expansion to the building is proposed. 4. The traffic generated by permitting the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a homebrewing supply store with sales of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption within an existing industrial building would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the use is consistent with uses permitted in the zone. The number of vehicles entering and exiting the Property would not increase in conjunction with this request. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). - 3 - PC2020 -*** 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The Property is located Census Tract Number 117.14 which has a population of 499 people. This population allows for zero on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 11 licenses in the tract. It also allows for zero off-sale licenses and there are presently three licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 1431 which is below the city average in crime. The ¼- mile radius surrounding this location is 21% above the city average in crime. Since the crime rate is above the city-wide average, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required. 6. The request to permit alcoholic beverage sales for on and off-premises consumption would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposed development of the premises is compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area; and - 4 - PC2020 -*** 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guideline for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151 contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Conditional Use Permit No. 2020-06061 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2020-00151 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 5 - PC2020 -*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2020 -*** - 7 - PC2020 -*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06061 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00151 (DEV2020-00038) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 2 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department 3 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 4 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises, except for the tasting area. Police Department 5 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement 6 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 7 There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 8 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 9 Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department - 8 - PC2020 -*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 Petitioner(s) shall not require an admission/cover charge. Police Department 11 The area where tastings are allowed shall be made separate with a pony wall, barrels, or other approved material, to clearly define the tasting space. This is the only space approved for a Type 42 license. The rest of the building shall be a Type 20 off-sale alcoholic beverage control license. Police Department 12 A sign shall be posted on the outside of the tasting area that reads, “Patrons 21 and Over Only.” There shall be another sign on the inside of the tasting area leading out that reads, “No Alcohol Beyond This Point.” The tasting area shall be made up of a bar type counter with three seats. This is approved as a tasting area only. Police Department 13 There shall be no entertainment or amplified music on the premise at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police Department 14 Hours of operation shall be limited from 10:00 am to 7:00 pm seven days a week. Changes to the hours of operation may be amended at the request of the business owner and is subject to the approval of the Planning and Building Department Director and the Chief of Police. Police Department and Planning and Building Department, Planning Services GENERAL 15 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services 16 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services - 9 - PC2020 -*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 17 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services 18 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services City of Anaheim INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE To: Scott Koehm/Planning Department Case No.: DEV 2020-00038 Windsor Homebrew Supply Co. 1045 N. Armando Street, Suite E Date: March 9, 2020 From: Lieutenant Willie Triplett Anaheim Police Department Crime Suppression Section Commander Contact: Name: Civilian Investigator Michele Murray Phone: 714-765-1461 Email: mmurray@anaheim.net The Police Department has reviewed the above case. Please see the following comments and conditions for more information: COMMENTS: Public Convenience and Necessity Information: The Police Department has received an I.D.C. Route Sheet for DEV 2020-00038. Request to permit a home brewing retail supply store with sale of beer and wine for on and off-premises consumption. The location is in Census Tract Number 117.14 which has a population of 499. This population allows for 0 on-sale Alcoholic Beverage Control licenses and there are presently 11 licenses in the tract. It also allows for 0 off-sale licenses and there are presently 3 licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 1431 which is below the city average in crime. There have been 4 calls for service to this location in the last year and they consisted of: 4 burglaries. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 21% above the city average in crime. The calls for service primarily consisted of: 32 petty thefts, 9 drug violations, 8 simple assaults, 10 vandalisms, and 8 thefts from vehicles. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: The above location is predominately an off-sale location but would like to offer tastings of certain beers they sell. For that reason alone they have to get a Type 20 off-sale license and a Type 42 public premises ABC license. The area for tasting is limited to persons 21 and over only and is for tastings only. Similar to the tastings available in grocery stores. This is meant for a tasting area only, not a brewery which would brew its own beer and sell that to customers. This will allow the tasting of beer only, and no other Type 42 privileges. The Police Department requests the following conditions be placed on the Conditional Use Permit: ATTACHMENT NO. 2 1. The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 2. The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department 3. No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 4. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises, except for the tasting area. Police Department 5. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours. Police Department 6. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the premises. Police Department 7. There shall be no pay to play amusement machines or video game devices maintained upon the premises at any time. Police Department 8. There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 9. Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program), RBS, or similar certificate training for themselves and register employees. The contact number for ABC is 657-205-3533. Police Department 10. Petitioner(s) shall not require an admission/cover charge. Police Department 11. Thea area where tastings are allowed shall be made separate with a pony wall, barrels, or other approved material, to clearly define the tasting space. This is the only space approved for a Type 42 license. The rest of the building shall be a Type 20 off-sale alcoholic beverage control license. Police Department 12. A sign shall be posted on the outside of the area that reads, “Patrons 21 and Over Only.” There shall be another sign on the inside of the tasting area leading out that reads, “No Alcohol Beyond This Point.” The tasting area shall be made up of a bar type counter and no seating. This is approved as a tasting area only. Police Department 13. There shall be no entertainment or amplified music on the premise at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police Department 14. Hours of operation shall be limited from 10:00 am to 7:00 pm seven days a week. Police Department Concur: Office of Chief of Police f:\home\mmurray\Dev 2020-00038 1045 N Armando E Windsor Homebrew.doc Letter of Operation Windsor Homebrew Supply Co is a specialty retail shop selling equipment and ingredients to make beer and wine at home with a strong focus on community and education. We have been in operation for 5 years now in Costa Mesa and would love to expand to Anaheim. We are proposing adding on a small “bottle shop” to the current retail location measuring roughly 450 square feet. With this bottle shop we plan to sell unique, high end bottles from local breweries and wineries not found anywhere else in the area. We will also have a small number of taps to have limited, craft beers on draft. We will by no means operate as a traditional liquor store or bar. This is an addition to our current retail shop. Our Current hours are 10-6 and we are open 5 days a week. In the future we might be open 6 or 7 days a week and possibly open until 7. All of this to say that we are not a late night destination and have no intention to be. We will not offer hard liquor, cigarettes, lotto tickets ect. The sale of beer and wine is estimated to be around 10-15% of gross sales for the shop. We have watched as the beer scene in Anaheim has grown and flourished into Brew City and we want to be a part of it. We want to help continue the momentum and help grow the community further. We feel we would be beneficial to Brew City due to the fact that we carry hyper local products from the Anaheim breweries and also harder to find beer and wine not found elsewhere in the area. We plan to continue classes and educational events that help promote safe and responsible consumption of alcohol. We are also a proud member of the Orange County Brewers Guild that seeks to educate the public and participate in local community events that raise funds for various local charities. We are committed to making the store a safe, well lit place to shop. We will abide by all ABC rules and post signs that deter loitering. We plan to have 2-3 employees running the shop. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Conditional Use Permit Letter of Justification A.Indicate how the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. The proposed use is located in an existing industrial development. The property is located in the Canyon Specific Plan in DA7 which is a flex area designed to allow industrial and commercial uses. The proposed use is a retail shop with sales of beer for on and off-premises consumption. There are other retail businesses in the development as well as breweries who sell beer for on and off-premises consumption. This shop will have hours of operation that are less than the breweries. The parking in the development exceeds the number of spaces required by the Anaheim Municipal Code. For these reasons, the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. B.Explain how the site proposed for the use is large enough to accommodate anticipated growth of the development and allow the continued operation without causing a detriment to the particular area or to health and safety. There are greater than 70 parking spaces provided on the property beyond what is required by Code. The retail shop will not cause a detriment to the area due to the excess parking available and the limited hours of operation. C.Indicate how the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the roads designed and constructed to handle the traffic in the area. The traffic generated by the retail shop will be consistent with the zoning and General Plan designation for the property. The roads have been designed and constructed to accommodate this type of use in this zone. D.Indicate how approval of this Conditional Use Permit or Minor Conditional Use Permit with any conditions of approval, will not harm the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The retail shop will operate mainly during the day and will comply with all ABC requirements. The purpose of the sale of beer for on and off-premises consumption is to provide customers with local high-end craft beer and hard to acquire brands. The shop will not operate as a bar but as a place to taste beers before purchasing, similar to tasting counters found in stores like BevMo and Total Wine. |91 K R A E M E R B L V D G L A S S E L L S T RIVERDALE A V E B L U E G U M S T RIO VIS T A S T ORANGET H O R P E A V E TU S T I N A V E JE F F E R S O N S T LA PALM A A V E R O S E D R CROWTHER AVE LA P A L M A A V E MIRALOM A A V E FRO N T E R A S T M I L L E R S T 5914 Quarter Mile Buffer City Boundary Subject Site Census Tract 117.14 Police Reporting District Key to Features City of Anaheim GIS Central April 21, 2020 °0 700 1,400 Feet On-Sale11 Total Off_Sale3 Total 1:18,000 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 AT T A C H M E N T NO. 6 CO N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T LEDGEND N T S To whom it may concern, Myself and my team at Bo6le Logic became fast friends with Sco6 and Windsor Homebrew Supply a?er making various trips down to Costa Mesa for supplies when we were short on brewing ingredients. We also crossed paths with Sco6 as he helped with local beer fesDvals and put on educaDonal events with the Orange County Brewers Guild. It was exciDng news when Sco6 opened a small bo6le shop in his Costa Mesa locaDon and starDng using his contacts around the country and Europe to source limited and hard to find cra? beers. I made more and more trips down to Costa Mesa when I could find the Dme for these limited beers. I could not have been more thrilled when Sco6 told us his plans on opening a new locaDon across the street from our brewery Bo6le Logic. We highly recommend that he be allowed to sell high end rare bo6les to go and have a small tasDng area to further the beer educaDon in Brew City and the La Palma Beer Trail. Sco6 will be a great addiDon to the Anaheim beer scene as he is extremely knowledgeable about beer and cares greatly about it. He is kind, responsible and highly respected by everyone in the brewing community. Thanks for your Dme and consideraDon. Regards, Brandon Buckner Co-Owner Bo6le Logic Brewing 714-244-5977 buckner@bo6lelogic.com ATTACHMENT NO. 7 From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Support For Windsor Date:Saturday, March 28, 2020 11:19:09 AM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Crea <mike@unsungbrewing.com> Subject: Support For Windsor Date: February 13, 2020 at 2:00:53 PM PST To: scott@windsorhomebrewsupply.com “Scott is one of the most genuine people I have met here in Orange County. He cares about his customers, cares about quality, and cares about helping the craft beer movement through constant education and interaction with all of his customers. Before I began brewing professionally, there was zero places that had high quality ingredients. I feel that Scott and his success is entirely surrounded because of the person he is. We are extremely happy to see him expand and reach even more folks eager to get into this fun industry of ours!" Best, Mike Crea, Owner - Certified Cicerone™ Unsung Brewing Company Anaheim, CA 92805 www.unsungbrewing.com April 19, 2020 To Whom It May Concern: I write this letter in support of the Windsor Homebrew Supply Company. As an Anaheim resident and amateur home brewer, I have found myself going to their Costa Mesa establishment to find the quality brewing supplies I need. But of course, one does not leave the shop without picking up a few libations as well because tasting, analyzing, and bonding with friends over beer while homebrewing is part of what makes the experience so special. I would much rather do that all here, in the community I have chosen to call home. I would love to see this company that believes so much in the community be able to provide its full services to our Anaheim community. Should you grant the request to allow them to further expand their business, I think you will find it will provide great dividends and deepen our community's connection. And frankly, in our City of Kindness, you will find no kinder business owner than Scott Windsor. These are certainly unique, trying times we are experiencing, and allowing a small business like Windsor to grow contrary to all of that is a beacon of hope for our community. I urge you to support and allow Windsor Homebrew Supply to provide the whole package and allow beer sales. Most Sincerely, Craig Spratt 2071 West Coronet Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Letter of support Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:57:41 AM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Focaccia Boi <focacciaboi@gmail.com> Subject: Letter of support Date: April 18, 2020 at 6:58:13 PM PDT To: info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com To whom it may concern, I moved back to Anaheim from Seattle a couple years ago and was introduced to Scott and his shop in Costa Mesa very soon after. His shop instantly became a destination for me, he developed a community of patrons that cared about small business, craft and quality. With all the new small business opening up in this uncertain time we need people who are developing something special to bring people to our city and that person is Scott. An independent craft focused shop would be a welcomed addition to Anaheim. Sincerely, Anaheim resident Derek Bracho Dear Reviewers: As a patron to Windsor Homebrew Supply Co I would like to express my support for the continued growth of this small business. This team is important to myself and others in supporting a growing hobby and close knit community. I would like to see this business obtain an additional means of gaining revenue so we can keep this “Mom and Pop” business surviving through these uncertain times. I am extremely grateful for the new friendships this shop has made possible. And I again strongly recommend and support the continued growth for my Home Brewing family. Sincerely , Kyle Wells From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Proposal For Bottle Distribution Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:57:54 AM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Jose <josephthe2nd@gmail.com> Subject: Proposal For Bottle Distribution Date: April 18, 2020 at 6:15:10 PM PDT To: Scott Windsor <info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com> To Whom It May Concern, As an Orange County resident who spends an overwhelming amount of money at local and small businesses, I fully support Windsor Homebrew Supply’s effort to distribute bottled and canned alcoholic beverages at a new location. They have built an establishment that is well respected and appreciated among responsible craft beer consumers. Their commitment to high quality service, as well as products will be beneficial to the local community. Respectfully, Jose Torrres From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Bottle Shop in North OC Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:58:10 AM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Jacob Suarez <jnsuarez44@gmail.com> Subject: Bottle Shop in North OC Date: April 18, 2020 at 6:02:02 PM PDT To: info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com To whom it may concern, Having a bottle shop like Windsor located in North Orange County would bring a diverse supply of beer for people to shop and sample local or distant breweries. Jacob S. From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Anaheim Bottle Shop Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 3:58:49 PM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Gabe <gaberlonghi@gmail.com> Subject: Anaheim Bottle Shop Date: April 19, 2020 at 1:19:21 PM PDT To: Scott Windsor <info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com> The city of Anaheim not only needs a high quality craft beer bottle shop like Windsor to supplement it's local breweries, it needs people like Scott and his staff. They are true ambassadors of craft beer; knowledgeable, personable, and the best possible face of the community that is craft beer you could ask for. Support small business and let this local, community focused shop thrive and build up the community around it in the process. From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 10:58:29 AM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Chris R <cleer322@gmail.com> Date: April 18, 2020 at 5:34:45 PM PDT To: info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com To whom it may concern, I am an OC native, currently living in Orange. My frequent bottle shop is Windsor Homebrew Supply in Costa Mesa. I drive all the way to Costa Mesa to buy beer from them vs going to any other store down the street. THIS IS THE SPOT. The owner, Scott Windsor, has literally never let me down on recommendations when I come in asking for a certain style of beer to purchase. He is super knowledgeable about the craft beer scene, styles, flavors, profiles, you name it. They have beer that I've never seen, heard of, or drank before. Plus he even educates you on the brewery he recommends!!! This is my go to spot. Hearing that he has a location closer to me is beyond exciting! IF ONLY HE COULD SELL BEER CANS AND BOTTLES AT THE NEW LOCATION TOO!!! Sincerely, Christopher Roth From:Scott Windsor To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Bottle Shop in Anaheim Date:Sunday, April 19, 2020 3:59:17 PM Windsor Homebrew Supply Co 743 Baker Suite D Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714-668-9850 1045 N Armando Suite E Anaheim, CA 92806 714-666-8727 Begin forwarded message: From: Jonathan Tuttle <jdtuttle@sbcglobal.net> Subject: Bottle Shop in Anaheim Date: April 19, 2020 at 1:03:15 PM PDT To: info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com Hello Scott, I am in full support of a bottle shop at your Anaheim location. The location is perfect for one and it goes without saying that it pairs well with Homebrew supply. Finding different beers to try is important in growing as a home brewer and broadening you’re knowledge of beer. Always in support, Jonathan Tuttle Sent from my iPhone From:Scott To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Anaheim Bottle shop Date:Monday, April 20, 2020 6:25:57 PM Another one from an Anaheim resident Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Scott Windsor <anaheim@windsorhomebrewsupply.com> Date: April 20, 2020 at 6:24:17 PM PDT To: Scott Windsor <info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com> Subject: Fwd: Anaheim Bottle shop ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Daren Lacher <icatchemall@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:43 PM Subject: Anaheim Bottle shop To: Scott Windsor <anaheim@windsorhomebrewsupply.com> Scott, I was really happy to learn you decided to open a homebrew supply shop so close to my house, and even happier when I learned you had intentions to carry off site sales, and even happier when I learned you would have a small amount of taps within the shop. I think this is a great supplement to the tasting rooms in the area and will only draw more consumers and beer lovers to the area. Welcome Windsor Home Brew to North Orange County Daren Lacher Homebrewer/Beer Nerd From:Scott To:Scott Koehm Subject:Fwd: Support for Bottle Shop Date:Tuesday, April 21, 2020 11:13:05 PM Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Ismael Coronel <coronel88@csu.fullerton.edu> Date: April 21, 2020 at 11:11:14 PM PDT To: info@windsorhomebrewsupply.com Subject: Support for Bottle Shop To who this may concern, As a proud resident of Anaheim and its commitment to craft beer, one area our city is seriously lacking in is a quality craft beer store. I frequently travel out of the city to find any decent stores, so hearing that Scott Windsor wants to offer the great service and selection that he already does at his Costa Mesa store would be a great way of spending my money locally. Not only would this encourage more local support for the brew city that’s been built up, but it would add a missing piece of the La Palma beer corridor that me and other craft beer enthusiasts have been clamoring for. Thank you for your time and consideration, Ismael Coronel 542 S Casita Street Anaheim, 92805 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 LOCATION: 4900 East La Palma Avenue (Softball Performance Workshop) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Jennifer Schroeder of Softball Performance Workshop, and the property owner is Kurt and Anna Krumes of Anaheim Door Company. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to permit and retain an indoor softball training facility within an existing industrial building. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines, and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954. BACKGROUND: The 1.7-acre property is developed with two businesses operating in two existing industrial buildings: a garage door contractor, and the subject indoor softball training facility. The property is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan “SP2015-01” (Industrial Area – DA 1, and the General Plan designates the property for Industrial land uses. Surrounding land uses include a private school across La Palma Avenue to the north, industrial land uses to the east and west, and the Santa Ana River to the south. The northerly building closest to La Palma Avenue is occupied by the Anaheim Door Company and the southerly, or rear building, is occupied by the Softball Performance Workshop (SPW). SPW has been in operation at this location since at least 2017 without the required Conditional Use Permit, when Code Enforcement cited SPW for no business license. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to retain the existing 14,400 square foot indoor softball training facility. Tenant improvements to the building include offices, batting cages, pitching areas, and open fielding areas. Many of these tenant improvements have been constructed without building permits and would require approvals through the City’s tenant improvement permitting process. Business operations include private training (hitting, catching, pitching, etc.) by appointment. Private training is conducted in groups of 1-8 athletes with up to three coaches. Typical operations include 20-30 people on site at any given time, including coaches and parents. The maximum number of people is 40 people. Hours of operation are from 5:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Monday-Wednesday; and 5:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Thursdays. The business is open occasionally on weekends (Friday to Sunday, up to five times per year) for only one team at a time, when rain prevents outdoor practices. The property is shared with Anaheim Door Company which is open Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and Saturdays 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. FLOOR PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 4 The applicant proposes a restriping plan that would result in 54 parking spaces. SITE PLAN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Municipal Code requires approval of a conditional use permit for “Recreation Commercial – Indoor” uses to ensure that the uses are appropriate for the site, compatible with surrounding land uses, and in compliance with Municipal Code requirements. Staff believes this request to permit and retain the existing training facility is appropriate because the business would not create any adverse impacts to surrounding land uses. The Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan encourages the creation a successful business climate with flexible regulations as well as new amenities, such as the proposed training facility, that serve a variety of clientele during both the daytime and nighttime hours. Staff believes that the addition of training facility would continue to implement the vision of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan and recommends approval of the conditional use permit. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 April 27, 2020 Page 4 of 4 The existing parking lot is in a state of disrepair and would require repaving and restriping. As a result of the applicant’s proposed restriping plan, there would be 54 parking spaces. Staff estimates that restriping will actually result in 51 spaces, rather than the proposed 54. The Municipal Code requires that parking demand be calculated by parking demand study or by parking letter. In order to demonstrate adequate parking exists on the property, the applicant conducted parking counts during normal business operations, when both businesses were open, and later in the evening when Anaheim Door had closed. Peak demand was found to be 35 cars on a Wednesday evening at 7:30 p.m., resulting in a surplus of 16 parking spaces. Staff conducted two field visits and verified the results of the applicant’s study. The draft resolution includes a condition of approval requiring repaving and restriping of the parking lot. The unpermitted tenant improvements are required to be addressed through the Building Division. Accordingly, staff has included conditions of approval to ensure timely compliance. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 1, Existing Facilities, Categorical Exemption. Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is a request to permit and retain the unpermitted indoor softball training facility an existing industrial building. The unpermitted use includes an batting cages, indoor training areas, and ancillary offices. CEQA permits the use of the Class 1 Exemption for interior alterations. As such, the proposed project meets the criteria for a Class 1 categorical exemption. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that conditions exist for the Planning Commission to make the required findings to approve this request. The proposed indoor softball training facility would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Additionally, the number of parking spaces provided would be adequate to accommodate both uses on the property. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP David See Associate Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Letter of Request 3. Parking Letter 4. Plans 5. Site Photographs SP 2015-1 DEV 2018-00008 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 SELF STORAGE FACILITY SP 2015-1 DA1 PRIVATE SCHOOL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 SANTA ANA RIVER SP 2015-1 DA6 SANTA ANA RIVER SP 2015-1 DA6 SANTA ANA RIVER SP 2015-1 DA1 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 OFFICES E LA PALMA AVE N M A N A S S E R O S T E. LA PALMA AVE N . I M P E R I A L H W Y N . L A K E V I E W A V E E . R I V E R D A L E A V E E. S A N TA A N A C A N Y O N R D E. MIRALOMA AVE E. ORANGETHORPE AVE 4900 Ea st L a Palma Aven ue DE V N o. 2018-00008 Subject Property APN: 346-403-07 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 E LA PALMA AVE N M A N A S S E R O S T E. LA PALMA AVE N . I M P E R I A L H W Y N . L A K E V I E W A V E E . R I V E R D A L E A V E E. S A N TA A N A C A N Y O N R D E. MIRALOMA AVE E. ORANGETHORPE AVE 4900 Ea st L a Palma Aven ue DE V N o. 2018-00008 Subject Property APN: 346-403-07 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2018-00008) (4900 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954 to permit and retain an existing indoor softball training facility (the "Proposed Project") for premises located at that certain real property at 4900 East La Palma Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.7-acres in size and is currently developed with two industrial buildings. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Industrial land uses. The Property is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan “SP2015-1” Development Area 1 (Industrial Area), and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the Planning Commission at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2020-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit and retain an indoor softball training facility in an existing industrial building is an allowable use within the "SP2015-1" Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan under subsection .040 of Section 18.120.040 (Uses) of Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of Development Area 1. 2. The conditional use permit, subject to compliance with the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area because the Property is developed with two industrial buildings and there is a sufficient amount of parking spaces to accommodate the parking demand for the indoor traning facility and the existing industrial use. 3. The size and shape of the Property is adequate to allow the full operation of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health, safety and general welfare because the facility is located within an industrial building with a sufficient number of on- site parking spaces being provided, adequate vehicle circulation is provided on site, and compliance with the conditions of approval contained herein will ensure that the indoor training facility does not have an adverse impact on the adjacent uses. 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets to accommodate the use. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 3 - PC2020-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954, and further contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05954 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2020-*** - 6 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05954 (DEV2018-00008) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 All doors shall remain closed at all times to prevent noise impacts to surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 Sufficient parking for all uses located at the subject property shall be maintained at all times, so that the uses will not cause any parking impacts to surrounding uses. Should the parking demand exceed the existing parking supply, or otherwise be determined as insufficient, the Planning and Building Director may require a modification to the indoor training facility operations until such time that parking issues have been adequately addressed. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 The facility shall operate in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application. Any changes to the facility’s operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 Ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site. Deliveries shall not take place on any part of the public right of way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 5 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the property owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement Division 6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 7 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 8 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 Within 30 days of the date of this resolution, the applicant shall secure the services of a licensed architect or other qualified design professional to prepare plans for all unpermitted work and any other proposed improvements, including the building’s change of occupancy, batting cages, offices, and parking lot paving and restriping. These timelines may be modified due to an unforeseen hardship, such as a State of Emergency declaration by the City, State, or Federal government, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 10 Within 90 days of the date of this resolution, all necessary plans and documentation for unpermitted and proposed improvements, including the relocation and the building’s change of occupancy and the parking lot paving and restriping, shall be submitted to the Building Division, demonstrating that the use complies with all applicable requirements of the California Building and Fire Codes. A parking lot paving and restriping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. This plan shall adequately address any outstanding comments from the Traffic Division related to parking lot striping. These timelines may be modified due to an unforeseen hardship, such as a State of Emergency declaration by the City, State, or Federal government, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services and Building Divisions 11 Within 150 days of the date of this resolution, the applicant shall obtain all applicable building permits for unpermitted and proposed improvements, including the building’s change of occupancy and parking lot paving and restriping. These timelines may be modified due to an unforeseen hardship, such as a State of Emergency declaration by the City, State, or Federal government, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services and Building Divisions - 8 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 12 Within 240 days of the date of this resolution (approximately eight months), the applicant shall have completed all work and obtained all necessary building permit inspections and approvals, including final inspections, and a certificate of occupancy for all work described in the prior conditions of approval. These timelines may be modified due to an unforeseen hardship, such as a State of Emergency declaration by the City, State, or Federal government, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 13 Prior to final Building and Zoning Inspections, the legal property owner shall submit a Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department for review and approval. The Certificate of Compliance shall be recorded with the Orange County Recorder’s office prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works Department, Development Services 14 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works Department, Development Services 15 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Softball Performance Workshop 4900 E. La Palma Ave Anaheim, CA 92807 May 2019: Updated To Whom It May Concern: The Softball Performance Workshop is the premier softball training facility in California. We offer private hitting, catching, defense, and pitching classes. All classes are by appointment only. Hitting lessons are booked, by appointment, every hour and half hour, Monday- Wednesday from 5:00-8:00 pm. One hitter has a lesson every half hour. One coach instructs our hitting clients at a time. We have one designated hitting lesson cage. We have one defensive coach whose classes are booked by appointment, every hour, on the half hour, Monday-Wednesday, from 6:30-9:30pm. There are 3-6 athletes in a class at a time, classes are one hour long. We have a specifically designated defense area. Catching lessons are booked, by appointment, every hour, on the half hour, Monday- Wednesday, from 5:30-9:30pm. A minimum of 4 catchers and a maximum of 8 catchers workout at one time alongside 2-3 coaches. We have one designated catching area. Pitching is done on a 1 on 1 basis. We have one pitching coach who works, by appointment only. Our pitching coach works one day a week, only. We have one pitching coach who has her own designated lesson-cage. We no longer have a strength and conditioning classes, nor private team workouts. We are strictly a private training center. Most all of our students come once a week and stay for multiple classes. On average, a student is taking 2 classes a night. It is very rare for a student to only take one class and therefore the parking lot is not loaded and cleared each hour or half hour. A majority of our students are under the driving age and are dropped off for the evening and picked up at the end of her sessions. If a parent stays for the evening, they ATTACHMENT NO. 2 typically park and stay for all of their daughter’s classes. Usually if a parent comes they are alone. It is very rare a parent comes with their spouse. All of our business hours are “after typical business hours” and do not interfere with any of ur neighboring businesses. Our busiest hour is from 6:30-7:30pm. The front building, Anaheim Door Company, has opposite business hours as us and all of their employees have left the parking lot no later than 4:30pm. In almost 5 years of doing business here, we have never had a parking issue with Anaheim Door’s employees or their clients. Occasionally, on a rainy Saturday or Sunday (less than 5 times a year), softball teams will rent our facility for their practices. Weekend use is very rare as it rarely rains in Southern California, however, if the building is used, typically approximately 12 cars fill our parking lot for 2 hours at a time. At most, we will have 2 teams rent the space a day and never at the same time. Ample parking exists in the back of the building for this usage. Please note, we are aware our parking lot is not in good shape as the striping is barely visible. The owners of the property (also owners of Anaheim Door Company) have agreed to make the needed upgrades once I supply them an order list from The City of Anaheim. On another note, as someone who travels the world throwing softball clinics each week, I cannot stress enough the role our Workshop plays in female athletes’ and their families’ lives. Without a doubt, we are the premier softball training facility; a place where girls travel from all over the world to feel the energy of our atmosphere and work alongside our renowned coaches. Our space is where they work towards their dreams which we help understand they CAN achieve. I know it’s cliche, but we truly change lives. Please let me know if there is anything else I can supply to you. Sincerely, Jen Schroeder SOFTBALL PERFORMANCE WORKSHOP 4900 E. LA PALMA, AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92807 HOURS OF OPERATION: BY APPOINTMENT ONLY The Softball Performance Workshop will be open from 5:30pm-9:30pm, Monday- Wednesday and 5:30-8:30 on Thursdays. We are only open about 5 weekends a year (Friday- Sunday), and mostly when there is rain and softball teams cannot practice outside. This mostly happens on Saturday and Sundays and when this occurs, we only allow one team in the building at a time, which is less than 20 people. Parking has never been an issue on the weekends. Our business hours are very close to exact opposite of the neighboring businesses and parking does not interfere with the business hours of the company we share a parking lot with. Anaheim Door Company is open M-F, 8-6pm and Saturday 9-4pm. Appointments at The Softball Performance Workshop can be made by telephone or email. PARKING STUDY: UPDATED: With our new site plan, there are 42 available parking spaces and 4 handicapped spaces. The most number of people at the facility at one time will be 35, and on average, there are 20-30 people, including parents and coaches, inside our facility at one time. Most of the training will be for children ranging from the ages of 9-17, so only a few will be driving. A majority of students will be dropped off by parents or a parent will wait for a child and sit inside the facility as a student completes typically 1-2 hours of training. There will be no more than 6 coaches at the facility and all of these coaches will park there vehicles around the 6pm hour and leave around 9pm. All classes are by appointment only and no walk-ins are welcome. I conducted a parking study and counted cars on 3 separate occasions; here are the total number of cars that were in the parking lot: Monday, July 15th 530- 20 cars 630- 31 cars 730- 33 cars 830- 26 cars Tuesday, August 6th 530- 15 cars 630- 20 cars 730- 21 cars 830- 18 cars Wednesday, August 30th 530- 19 cars 630- 31 cars 730- 35 cars 830- 25 cars ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Front, Northern facing, building of 4900 E La Palma, “Anaheim Door” front facing to La Palma Western side of properties and side parking area. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 South side of the back building & back parking area faces the riverbed. South side of property, facing the back building West side of building, entrance to the proposed space in the back of the lot West side of building and parking spaces Front building of 4900 E La Palma. Proposed space is behind this building. Properties to the East. Proposed office/administration space. Open turfed area. Parent and waiting area. “Soft-Net Cages” 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 LOCATION: 3430 West Lincoln Avenue (Grocery Outlet Bargain Center) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Sean Campbell of United Sign Systems. The property owner is Young Lee of Premier Management LLC. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of variance to exceed the maximum sign area allowed by the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) for a secondary wall sign in conjunction with an existing grocery store. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution denying Variance No. 2019-05129. BACKGROUND: The site is developed with a large commercial retail center located on a 2-acre parcel that is part of an integrated 6-acre shopping center on five separate parcels. The property is zoned “C-G” General Commercial and the General Plan designates the property for Neighborhood Center land uses. The shopping center is bordered by a large commercial retail center to east and west, a self-storage facility to the south, and a large commercial retail center to the north across Lincoln Avenue in the City of Buena Park. Grocery Outlet Bargain Center is a tenant within a large commercial center, occupying a 26,500 square foot tenant space previously occupied by the Stater Brothers. Grocery Outlet Bargain Center opened in October 2019, at which time a new building wall sign was installed and a non-conforming pylon sign was refaced. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to install a secondary 103 square foot wall sign along the primary north façade of an existing grocery store. The applicant states in the Letter of Request (Attachment 2) that the additional wall sign area is needed to adequately display the basic services found within the store due to partial obstruction of visibility for eastbound traffic on Lincoln Avenue, as well as the large setback of the storefront from the street. Additionally, the applicant states that there is a need to identify all services provided on-site to customers not familiar with their store. VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Proposed Building Elevation FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: The applicant requests a variance to exceed the maximum sign area for a secondary wall sign. The Planning Commission may grant the requested variance upon a finding that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of special circumstances shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Currently there exists a 191.25 square foot building wall sign, installed on north façade, and a non-conforming pole sign refaced with a 160 square foot sign with a sign copy that states “Grocery Outlet Bargain Center.” The following table identifies a comparison between the existing and proposed signs: AMC Sign Code standards Existing Signage Proposed Signage Wall Sign Area 193 square feet 191.25 square feet 103 square feet No. of Wall Signs 3* 1 2 Pole Sign Not permitted 160 square feet 160 square feet *Two additional wall signs are permitted on building elevations greater than 100 feet in length, except for elevations abutting a freeway or railroad per AMC Section 18.44.110.010.0102.05. VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Existing Non-Conforming Pole and Building Wall Signs Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Anaheim Municipal Code permits one wall sign per tenant space; however, two additional wall signs are permitted on building elevations greater than 100 feet in length. The total permitted sign area is limited to one square foot of sign area per lineal foot of that building elevation, which may include up to three permitted wall signs because the building length is 193 feet. Additionally, the sign display shall be limited to the name of the business and general services provided. Promotional messages and specific products or services rendered are not permitted. Although the Municipal Code allows a total of up to three wall signs, the existing wall sign utilizes nearly all of the permitted sign area (193 sq. ft. permitted; 191 sq. ft. existing). Staff believes that the basic services found within the store can be incorporated into the existing 191 sq. ft. wall sign. Despite the building having a large setback of 210 feet from the property line adjacent to Lincoln Avenue, staff does not believe that traffic traveling eastbound has limited visibility of the store because no trees or other visual obstructions exist in the parking lot area. Additionally, the existing non-conforming pole sign, located along Lincoln Avenue, provides sufficient advertising for customers traveling in both directions. There is opportunity to redesign the sign copy on the pole sign to include the various services provided within the store. Staff believes that a larger wall sign area is not needed to advertise the business on the north building wall; therefore, staff believes that the variance findings cannot be made and recommends denial of the applicant’s request to exceed the maximum sign area for a secondary wall sign on the front building façade. VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 April 27, 2020 Page 4 of 4 CONCLUSION: Staff does not support the applicant’s request to exceed the maximum sign area for a secondary wall sign. There is no special circumstance, including size, shape, topography, location or surrounding, that deprives the business from complying with the appropriate sign requirements. There is opportunity to redesign the existing signs to provide all of the sign copy without exceeding the maximum sign area permitted. For these reasons, staff recommends denial of this variance request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Jose Barriga David See Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Variance Resolution for Denial 2. Applicant’s Letter of Request 3. Applicant’s Variance Justification Letter 4. Site Plan and Sign Elevations C-G DEV 2019-00144 RETAIL RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 CYPRESS MEADOWS APTS 22 DU C-G SERVICE STATION C-G SELF STORAGE FACILITY C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G EL DORADO INN C-G RETAIL RM-4 DEL MONTE APARTMENTS 35 DU RM-4 RENAISSANCE PARK APARTMENTS 64 DU RM-4 RENAISSANCE PARK APARTMENTS 64 DU T MEDICAL OFFICE RM-4 KNOTT AVE APARTMENTS 9 DU RM-4 JOY APTS 9 DU RM-4 RENAISSANCE PARK APARTMENTS 90 DU RM-4 RENAISSANCE PARK APARTMENTS 90 DU RM-4 DEL MONTE APARTMENTS 28 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU C-G SOLARA COURT SENIOR APT HOMES 132 DU W LIN COLN AVE S K N O T T A V E K N O T T A V E W LIN COL N AVE W D EL M ON TE DR S B E L L A V I S T A S T W. LINCOLN AVE W. ORANGE AVE . CRESCENT AVE S . K N O T T A V E S . B E A C H B L V D W. LINCOLN AVE 3430 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2019-00144 Subject Property APN: 135-331-24 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 BUENA PARK W LIN COLN AVE S K N O T T A V E K N O T T A V E W LIN COL N AVE W D EL M ON TE DR S B E L L A V I S T A S T W. LINCOLN AVE W. ORANGE AVE . CRESCENT AVE S . K N O T T A V E S . B E A C H B L V D W. LINCOLN AVE 3430 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2019-00144 Subject Property APN: 135-331-24 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 BUENA PARK [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2020*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA FOR AN EXISTING GROCERY STORE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00144) (3430 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Variance No. 2019-01529 to exceed the maximum sign area for a grocery store located at 3430 West Lincoln Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. The existing large market is located within a large commercial retail center on real property generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Variance No. 2019-05129 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property located on a 2-acre parcel is part of an integrated 6-acre shopping center on five separate parcels, which is located within the "C-NC" Neighborhood Center land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the "C- G" General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance. No. 2019-05129 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Variance No. 2019-05129, does find and determine the following: SECTION NO. 18.44.110.010.0102 Maximum Wall Sign Area. (193 sq. ft. permitted; 294 sq. ft. proposed) - 2 - PC2020-*** 1. Strict application of the sign standards to the Property does not result in practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships or inconsistencies with the general intent of the Zoning Code. Although the Zoning Code allows a total of up to three wall signs, the existing wall sign utilizes nearly all of the Code permitted sign area. The need to identify the basic services found within can be redesigned into one wall sign that includes all the existing and proposed sign copy. Despite the building having a large setback, vehicular traffic traveling on Lincoln Avenue has adequare visibility of the store with no obstructions. The existing non-conforming pole sign, located along Lincoln Avenue, provides further advertising opportunities to traffic traveling both directions on Lincoln Avenue. There is opportunity to redesign the sign copy on the pole sign to include the various services provided within the store; and 2. That strict application of the sign standards does not prohibit the business owner from proposing reasonable alternatives to redesign existing signs to advertise all products and services within the grocery store. Additionally, no similar wall sign variances have been granted for other retail stores within the City. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby deny Variance No. 2019-05129, subject to the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 3 - PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2020-*** September 25, 2019 Project location: 3430 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801, APN: 135-331-24 Property owner: Premier Management Llc Young Lee 949-351-6517 landlinvestments@yahoo.com 3430 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Applicant: Sean Campbell c/o Grocery Outlet United Sign Systems 5201 Pentecost Dr., Modesto, CA 95356 209-572-5865; Fax: 209-543-1326 sean@unitedsign.net Agent: Mitch Chemers & Jeff Aran 18960 Ventura Blvd #127, Tarzana, CA 91356 818-468-2955; Fax: 916-395-6028 mitch@signbump.com Letter of Request The proposal includes a request for a variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three wall signs. The variance applies to one business within the shopping center. The subject business is a retail Grocery Outlet. The store is within a shopping center. All of the stores in the shopping center are also retail businesses. The subject building is located on a lot owned by one property owner. The other buildings in the shopping center are on lots owned by different property owners. At approximately 29,000 square feet, Grocery Outlet is the largest store in the shopping center, with the 99¢ Only Store the second largest at approximately 28,200 square feet. The Grocery Outlet store has one storefront elevation facing Lincoln Ave, with no secondary elevations for signage. The issues that affect Grocery Outlet storefront signage are a combination of the following: A critical need for all relevant department names on the storefront; a partial obstruction of visibility to eastbound traffic along Lincoln Ave; and relatively deep setback from the street. Grocery Outlet is requesting additional quantity of signs in order to adequately display the basic services found within the store. Based on extensive experience, the primary wall sign is fundamental and all five of the department names are critical for conveying the store’s offerings. The proposed signage consists of one primary wall sign and five smaller secondary department names. The primary wall sign is illuminated channel letters that reads “Grocery Outlet bargain market” at 105.5 square feet of sign area on a red non-illuminated background. The illuminated channel letter “department” names are relatively small compared to the primary sign. Those five secondary signs read: “Produce” (11.2 sf), “Dairy” (7 sf), “Meat” (6.6 sf), “Organics” (12.2 sf), and “Wine” (7 sf). The individual and combined area of the department names are relatively small compared to the primary wall sign and fit well on the storefront. With the thin strokes of the text and distance from each other, the department names provide the feel of being a single sign. The municipal code’s requirement that each sign be counted ATTACHMENT NO. 2 as individual is a technical one. In spirit, the combined department names feel like a second sign on the building, especially within the large scale of the storefront. There are modest visibility issues caused by a combination of issues including the storefront’s lack of visibility to Knott Ave and limited visibility to eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave. Along with deep setbacks and some visibility obstacles due to trees. These visibility issues work together with the identity issue to compound the signage problem for Grocery Outlet. This combination of issues is not common in the C-G zone and not common citywide. The applicant requests relief from the code in order to convey all of the critical service messaging so the store can install identity and visibility on par with other similar businesses in the zone and citywide. September 25, 2019 Project location: 3430 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801, APN: 135-331-24 Property owner: Premier Management Llc Young Lee 949-351-6517 landlinvestments@yahoo.com 3430 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Applicant: Sean Campbell c/o Grocery Outlet United Sign Systems 5201 Pentecost Dr., Modesto, CA 95356 209-572-5865; Fax: 209-543-1326 sean@unitedsign.net Agent: Mitch Chemers & Jeff Aran 18960 Ventura Blvd #127, Tarzana, CA 91356 818-468-2955; Fax: 916-395-6028 mitch@signbump.com Variance Justification Letter Sections 18.74.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that before any variance may be granted by the Planning Commission, the following shall be shown: 1.That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and The applicant’s storefront is subject to Chapter 18.44.110.0101.04 of the municipal code for wall signs on commercial storefronts: “Two additional wall signs are permitted on building elevations greater than 100 feet in length, except for elevations abutting a freeway or railroad”. Since the tenant’s building frontage is 193 lineal feet, it is entitled to a total of three wall signs. Due to a combination of conditions at the site, the applicant requests the right to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum of three. The issues that affect storefront signage are a combination of the following: A critical need for all relevant department names on the storefront; a partial obstruction of visibility to eastbound traffic along Lincoln Ave; and relatively deep setback from the street. A critical special circumstance is in regard to secondary signage, in the form of department names. The secondary department names are needed in addition to the primary business name. The Grocery Outlet identity includes five store department titles. The department titles are included because they are absolutely necessary to visually communicate the store’s message and purpose to the public. After extensive research and experience Grocery Outlet has confirmed the department names are essential, and their exclusion will result in a material loss of adequate identification for the business. The inability to include the critical department names, in combination with the modest visibility issues at this site is not an ordinary condition found in the city. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Based on a visibility study of the storefront, there will be a reduced opportunity for visibility of the storefront to drivers from specific directions. Due to the layout of the shopping center, the subject storefront can receive no visibility from northbound Knott Ave. The storefront can receive no functional visibility to southbound drivers along Knott Ave. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave approaching the site are not able to see the storefront from the intersection of Lincoln Ave and Knott Ave because of the Chevron building and pole sign. Only when eastbound drivers are just about in front of the store along Lincoln Ave can they get an unobstructed view of the storefront. Westbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are able to obtain a modestly unobstructed view of the storefront as they approach the shopping center, yet there are some trees along the street that create intermittent blockages. At the closest distance from the Grocery Outlet storefront to the street is approximately 234’. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are approximately 320’ away from the storefront when around 45 degrees from perpendicular to the storefront as they approach the shopping center. Although the storefront and signage is visible to traffic, it is limited to a very short distance in the eastbound direction of traffic, and can only facilitate proper reaction times for westbound traffic. As the larger of two anchors in the shopping center, these two issues have an impact on the storefront and its signage. These various circumstances work together to compound the issue of identity and functionality for Grocery Outlet signage. This combination of issues is not common in the C-G zone and not common citywide. 2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Other grocery stores in the same zone are able to communicate their message with a minimum of identity. It can be argued that those stores could communicate to the public and thrive in any community without any department names or only with one or two, as the average citizen is aware of their branding and which services those stores provide. Without the specific requested titles: “Produce Dairy Meat Organics Wine”, the public does not automatically presume all of those services are offered within. Grocery Outlet would suffer a verifiable disadvantage because of this issue. The store has had difficulty competing with similar businesses in similar types of communities. This identity challenge, combined with the modest impact of the storefront’s visibility challenge is unique in the city. The applicant has not been able to find a similar type of business that suffers from the same issues. Therefore, other properties in this zone and citywide are not currently deprived of the ability to convey their message to the public in the way this store would experience with strictly conforming signage. Denial of the sign variance would result in a disparity of visibility privileges which competitors and other buildings and tenants enjoy. In determining special circumstances, the California Supreme Court has held that disparities between properties need not be physical, but may also include a disparate impact of land use regulations in a particular zone. Topanga Assoc for Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 520; Craik v. County of Santa Cruz (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 880, 890. In order to determine if special circumstances exist, and to assist the Planning Commission to arrive at a decision, please provide a letter of justification to answer each of the following questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, as fully and completely as possible. The letter should list each code section for which a variance is required including a brief description of the requirement. Justification must be provided for each separate variance request. 1. Identify any special physical characteristics of the property such as shape, topography, location or surroundings that cause the requested development to not meet zoning codes. Chapter 18.44.110.0101.04 in regard to wall signs states that “Two additional wall signs are permitted on building elevations greater than 100 feet in length, except for elevations abutting a freeway or railroad”. Since the tenant’s building frontage is 193 lineal feet, it is entitled to a total of three wall signs. Due to a combination of conditions at the site, the applicant requests the right to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum of three. A critical special circumstance is in regard to secondary signage, in the form of department names. The secondary department names are needed in addition to the primary business name. The Grocery Outlet identity includes five store department titles. The department titles are included because they are absolutely necessary to visually communicate the store’s message and purpose to the public. After extensive research and experience, Grocery Outlet has confirmed the department names are essential, and their exclusion will result in a material loss of adequate identification for the business. The inability to include the critical department names, in combination with the visibility issues at this site is not an ordinary condition found in the city. The issues that affect storefront signage are a combination of the following: A critical need for all relevant department names on the storefront; a partial obstruction of visibility to eastbound traffic along Lincoln Ave; and relatively deep setback from the street. These various circumstances work together to compound the issue of identity and functionality for Grocery Outlet signage. This combination of issues is not common in the C-G zone and not common citywide. 2. Do other properties in the vicinity have the same type of physical characteristics as this property? If so, please identify a few of them. The identity and visibility challenges conforming sign size creates is unique to this shopping center and is unique throughout the city. This situation creates a special circumstance. Other shopping centers of this size throughout the city are able to effectively communicate their storefront identities to the public. Although Grocery Outlet is an anchor and should be prominently located within the shopping center, conforming signage would result in limited visibility with the orientation of the shopping center impacting and compounding its visibility challenges. A similar site with this combination of challenges has not been identified in the city. Granting of the variance does not constitute a special privilege because the variance would give the storefront signage parity with other retail stores throughout the city. The net result of the variance would be signage that “complements the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape”. The size and scale the wall signs will be appropriate for the scale of the building frontage, the buildings located on the property and the surrounding land uses and zone. 3. Identify any other neighboring properties that have the same type of improvement that you are requesting. The proposed signage consists of one primary wall sign and five smaller secondary department names. The primary wall sign is illuminated channel letters that reads “Grocery Outlet bargain market” at 105.5 square feet of sign area on a red non-illuminated background. The illuminated channel letter department names are relatively small compared to the primary sign. Those five secondary signs read: “Produce” (11.2 sf), “Dairy” (7 sf), “Meat” (6.6 sf), “Organics” (12.2 sf), and “Wine” (7 sf). The individual and combined area of the department names are relatively small compared to the primary wall sign. With the thin strokes of the text and distance from each other, the department names provide the feel of being a single sign. The municipal code’s requirement that each sign be counted as individual is a technical one. In spirit, the combined department names feel like a second sign on the building, especially within the large scale of the storefront. In summary, the request is to install a total of six wall signs on the primary storefront elevation There are a number of other businesses throughout the city in commercial zones that have more than the code’s allowable quantity of wall signs on a primary elevation, as well as secondary elevations. The list below shows a minimum of two dozen sites that verifiably have more signs that the municipal code allows. Note that not all signs in the city are included in this list, as there are a number of commercial buildings under 100 lineal feet that more that one sign, but that could have taken substantially more space here. The applicant acknowledges that some of these examples could be existing non-conforming, allowed with an entitlement, or simply installed illegally. And a small minority of these examples could be out of date. Regardless of the reasons for additional quantity beyond code, the majority of these examples include quantities larger than what the applicant is proposing. And some of these examples include sizes that exceed what the applicant is requesting, on smaller frontages than the Grocery Outlet frontage. Some of these examples clearly defy the intent of the municipal code, while many appear to work well in their environment. On the whole, the applicant posits that the proposed additional sign quantity is appropriately scaled to the storefront, fits well within the shopping center, and has a combined area and grouping that does not defy the spirit of the code. Like many of the examples throughout the city, a larger quantity (and ultimately larger area) of wall signs is not harming their respective zone or their environment. Especially because the requested sign sizes are quite a bit smaller than those at the sites on this list. Near major street Business Address Primary elev sign qty Secondary elev sign qty 3rd elev sign qty 4th elev sign qty La Palma Orange County Industrial Plastics 4850 La Palma Ave 8 Lincoln Meineke 80 S Citron St 7 2 Ball Road Alta Dena 3199 W Ball Rd 7 1 La Palma Reborn Cabinets 2954 E La Palma Ave 6 Lincoln Test Only Center 3180 W Lincoln Ave 5 2 Lincoln Style Decore 1683 W Lincoln Ave 5 Ball Road Guadalajara Super Market 2950 W Ball Rd 5 2 La Palma Allen Tire Company 955 N Harbor Blvd 4 4 La Palma Pro Wheel 929 Anaheim Blvd #B 4 Lincoln CVS 270 W Lincoln Ave 4 Ball Road Anaheim Auto Repair 2583 W Ball Rd 4 1 4 La Palma Walgreens 1717 W La Palma 3 3 1 La Palma Weir Canyon Honda 8323 E La Palma Ave 3 1 Lincoln McDonald's 3210 W Lincoln Ave 3 1 2 Lincoln First Class Auto Center 1745 W Lincoln Ave 3 2 Lincoln American Tire Depot 840 W Lincoln Ave 3 1 Lincoln Walgreens 128 S State College Blvd 3 5 1 Ball Road Walgreens 2560 W Ball Rd 3 2 La Palma Auto Xpert Service 929 Anaheim Blvd #B 2 La Palma Sun Muffler 929 Anaheim Blvd #B 2 2 Lincoln KFC 100 S Magnolia Ave 2 1 1 Lincoln Target 101 S Euclid St 2 2 1 1 Lincoln Eva's Barber Shop 605 W Lincoln Ave 2 1 1 La Palma Midas 1100 N Eulclid St 1 4 La Palma Del Taco 950 N Harbor Blvd 1 2 1 Lincoln CTL Printing 1741 W Lincoln Ave #E 1 3 1 Lincoln JR's Wheels & Tires 1695 W Lincoln Ave 1 4 Lincoln Jack in the Box 290 W Lincoln Ave 1 2 1 Lincoln CitiBank 198 W Lincoln Ave 1 1 1 Lincoln T Mobile 200 W Lincoln Ave 1 1 1 Lincoln KFC 2026 E Lincoln Ave 1 1 1 1 Ball Road El Pollo Loco 1201 State Rte 39 1 1 1 4. Identify the cause of the special characteristics of the site that limits the ability to comply w ith code requirements (e.g. natural slope of the land, placement of other structures). Based on a visibility study of the storefront, there will be a reduced opportunity for visibility of the storefront to drivers from specific directions. Due to the layout of the shopping center, the subject storefront can receive no visibility from northbound Knott Ave. The storefront can receive no functional visibility to southbound drivers along Knott Ave. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave approaching the site are not able to see the storefront from the intersection of Lincoln Ave and Knott Ave because of the Chevron building and pole sign. Only when eastbound drivers are just about in front of the store along Lincoln Ave can they get an unobstructed view of the storefront. Westbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are able to obtain a modestly unobstructed view of the storefront as they approach the shopping center, yet there are some trees along the street that create intermittent blockages. At the closest distance from the Grocery Outlet storefront to the street is approximately 234’. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are approximately 320’ away from the storefront when around 45 degrees from perpendicular to the storefront as they approach the shopping center. Although the storefront and signage is visible to traffic, it is limited to a very short distance in the eastbound direction of traffic, and can only facilitate proper reaction times for westbound traffic. As the larger of two anchors in the shopping center, these two issues have an impact on the storefront and its signage. Sheet 1 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow additional sign area.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Title Sheet Table of Contents Title Sheet ........................................................1 Site Plan ...........................................................2 Elevations .........................................................3 Rendering & Permitted Wall Sign A ..................4 Proposed Sign B...............................................5 Existing Pole Signs ...........................................6 Storefront Visibility ............................................7 Storefront Visibility Photos 1 .............................8 Storefront Visibility Photos 2 .............................9 Photo Key .......................................................10 Shopping Center Photos ................................11 Photos of shopping center from the streets ....12 Photos of Neighboring Properties...................13 3430 W. Lincoln Ave.Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow combined total of 294.55 square feet of wall signs in lieu of maximum 193 square feet allowed for a building with 193 linear feet of frontage. SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 APN: 135-331-24 Zone: C-G (General Commercial) General Plan Land Use: Neighborhood Center Lot size: 2.042 acres Legal description: P-Book: 22 Page: 5 Par: 1 Property owner: Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 Applicant: Sean Campbell c/o Grocery Outlet United Sign Systems 5201 Pentecost Dr. Modesto, CA 95356 209-572-5865 - Direct 209-543-1326 - Fax sean@unitedsign.net Agent: Mitch Chemers & Jeff Aran Imagetech Services 18960 Ventura Blvd #127 Tarzana, CA 91356 818-468-2955 mitch@signbump.com Vicinity Map Citywide contextNeighboring zones C-G C-G C-G C-G C-G Residential Medium C-G C-G C-G Aerial View City of Buena ParkCity of Buena Park City of Buena Park ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Sheet 2 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow additional sign area.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Site Plan SCALE 1" = 70'A SITE PLAN Legend Subject site property line Shopping center perimeter Interior lot lines City boundary K N O T T A V E LINCOLN AVE Chevron Inline shops 99¢ Only Store O'Reilly Auto Parts Apartment building Public Storage Public Storage Public Storage Public Storage City of Buena Park City of Buena Park City of Buena Park Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave 193'-0" Storefront 270.96' Lot frontage 598.6' shopping center street frontage DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY SIDEWALK S I D E W A L K 2 5 3 . 0 6 ' s h o p p i n g c e n t e r s t r e e t f r o n t a g e Curb face APN 135-331-242.042 acres CITY BOUNDARY SUBJECT LOTPROPERTY LINE Pole sign(In-line shops) Chevronpole sign Pole sign (99¢ Only & O’Reilly) Existing pole sign(Grocery Outlet) 2 3 4 ' f r o m s i g n a g e d i r e c t l y t o e d g e o f s t r e e t Sheet 3 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow additional sign area.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Elevations SCALE 1" = 15'A ELEVATION 193'-0" STOREFRONT 1 7 ' - 1 " t o g r a d e 2 2 ' - 5 " t o g r a d e Permitted Sign A. Permit #SGN2019-00132. 191.25 sq ft.2" deep non-illuminated background with internally illuminatedchannel letters. 36" Photo-Composite.View of storefront fromdirectly across the street. M 5 ' - 0 " 2'-0" 20'-8"EQ"EQ" Sign BProposed wall sign. 103.3 square foot borderless 2” deep non-illuminatedbackground painted to match wall, with illuminated5” deep channel letters. Sheet 4 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow additional sign area.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Rendering & Permitted Wall Sign A N SCALE 1" = 15'A RENDERING Scaled Rendering SCALE 1/4" = 1'B SIGN A DETAILS NTSCEND VIEW NTSDATTACHMENT LED illuminated channel letters on aluminum background (with behind the wall raceway) Clear acrylic letter faces with 2nd surface vinyl decoration: White and Golden Yellow #3630-125. 5” deep black returns with black 1” trimcap. UL approved white LED illumination. 0.100 aluminum face. Paint dark red #3630-73 mathews. 36” 19” 36"x308"= 77 sq.ft. 19"x216"= 28.5 sq.ft. 14” 26”23” 29” bkgd wall metal bkgd p/c letter 5” 2” 5” building fascia acrylic face trimcap led illumination 2" deep alum. bkgd aluminum return Led P/C Letter Detail on Metal Bkgd 12 volt power supply 12 volt wiring 3/8" all-thread thur-bolt (top & bottom) power supply can uni-strut reinforcement 105.5 square feet combined. 27'-0" (background) 8' - 0 " ( b a c k g r o u n d ) Sign A. Approved Wall SignPermit #SGN2019-00132191.25 square feet Sheet 5 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to allow additional sign area.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Proposed Sign B SCALE 3/8" = 1'A SIGN B DETAILS SCALE 3/8" = 1'B SIGN B CHANNEL LETTERS SIZES Sign B. Proposed Wall Sign White LEDs 3/16” White Acrylic face .040” Alum. Returns 1” Trim Cap .040” Alum. backs 5”2” elec. box LED power supply in metal box w/disc. switch Pan background Fascia Wall 1/4” Tek-screwsevery 2’ O.C. 3/8” Dia. lag bolts 1/2” flex w/ connector to primary 1 1/2” x 1 1/2” x 3/16” Alum. mounting angles low voltage wires 1/4” Tek-screws, 4 minper letter low voltage wires NTSCEND VIEW NTSDATTACHMENT bkgd wall metal bkgd p/c letter 5”2” Sign B: Led Illuminated P/C Letters on Pan Background clear acrylic letter faces with 2nd surface vinyl decoration; dark red #3630-73 & clear protective. 5" deep black returns with black 1" trimcap. ul approved red Led illumination. Pan background: alum. construction - paint to match wall (Putnam Ivory #H C-39) Putnam Ivory #HC-39 20’-8” 5’ - 0 ” 1’ - 6 ” 1’ - 1 ” 1’ - 6 ” 1’ - 1 ” to match wall 9.1 sq ft 7.1 sq ft 16.1 sq ft 6.8 sq ft 11.5 sq ft Combined area of text: 50.6 square feet 103.3 square feet Borderless non-illuminated background Sheet 6 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Existing Pole Signs K N O T T A V E LINCOLN AVE Chevron Inline shops 99¢ Only Store O'Reilly Auto PartsGrocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY S I D E W A L K Sheet 7 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 K N O T T A V E LINCOLN AVE Chevron Inline shops 99¢ Only Store O'Reilly Auto PartsGrocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY S I D E W A L K NTS Storefront Visibility Photo Key ABCD EF G H U LKJ M N Storefront Visibility Sheet 8 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Storefront Visibility Photos 1 A B C D E F Sheet 9 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Storefront Visibility Photos 2 G H I J K L Sheet 10 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Photo Key K N O T T A V E LINCOLN AVE Chevron Inline shops 99¢ Only Store O'Reilly Auto PartsGrocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY DRIVEWAY S I D E W A L K NTS Apartment building Public Storage Public Storage Public Storage Public Storage 01 02030405 10 09 07 11 08 12 13 14 15 City of Buena Park City of Buena Park City of Buena Park Sheet 11 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Shopping Center Photos 01 02 05 03 04 06 07 Sheet 12 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Photos of shopping center from the streets 08 10 11 12 09 Sheet 13 of 13 Project: Grocery Outlet 3430 W. Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Variance to install six wall signs in lieu of maximum three allowed.DESIGN MANUFACTURING INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE C.S.C.L. # 718965 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto, Calif. 95356 1-800-481-SIGN FAX (209) 543-1326 Property Owner Premier Management Llc 3430 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim, CA 92801 Photos of Neighboring Properties City of Buena ParkCity of Anaheim 13 15 14 April 27, 2019 Project location: 3430 W. Lincoln Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801, APN: 135-331-24 Update to Justifications Sections 18.74.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that before any variance may be granted by the Planning Commission, the following shall be shown: 1.That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and The applicant’s storefront is subject to Chapter 18.44.110.0101.05 of the municipal code for wall signs on commercial storefronts: “The maximum aggregate area of allowable wall signs per building elevation is limited to one square foot of sign area per lineal foot of that building elevation. Wall signs for individual tenants shall not exceed one square foot of area per lineal foot of said tenant’s building elevation”. Since the tenant’s building frontage is 193 lineal feet, it is entitled to a total of 193 square feet maximum sign area per code. Due to a combination of conditions at the site, the applicant requests the right to install 294.55 square feet of wall sign area in lieu of maximum of 193 square feet. The issues that affect storefront signage are a combination of the following: A critical need for all relevant department names on the storefront; a partial obstruction of visibility to eastbound traffic along Lincoln Ave; and relatively deep setback from the street. A critical special circumstance is in regard to secondary signage, in the form of department names. The secondary department names are needed in addition to the primary business name. The Grocery Outlet identity includes five store department titles. The department titles are included because they are absolutely necessary to visually communicate the store’s message and purpose to the public. After extensive research and experience Grocery Outlet has confirmed the department names are essential, and their exclusion will result in a material loss of adequate identification for the business. The inability to include the critical department names, in combination with the modest visibility issues at this site is not an ordinary condition found in the city. Based on a visibility study of the storefront, there will be a reduced opportunity for visibility of the storefront to drivers from specific directions. Due to the layout of the shopping center, the subject storefront can receive no visibility from northbound Knott Ave. The storefront can receive no functional visibility to southbound drivers along Knott Ave. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave approaching the site are not able to see the storefront from the intersection of Lincoln Ave and Knott Ave because of the Chevron building and pole sign. Only when eastbound drivers are just about in front of the store along Lincoln Ave can they get an unobstructed view of the storefront. Westbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are able to obtain a modestly unobstructed view of the storefront as they approach the shopping center, yet there are some trees along the street that create intermittent blockages. At the closest distance from the Grocery Outlet storefront to the street is approximately 234’. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are approximately 320’ away from the storefront when around 45 degrees from perpendicular to the storefront as they approach the shopping center. Although the storefront and signage is visible to traffic, it is limited to a very short distance in the eastbound direction of traffic, and can only facilitate proper reaction times for westbound traffic. As the larger of two anchors in the shopping center, these two issues have an impact on the storefront and its signage. While the applicant has the option to reduce the size of the permitted primary wall sign to accommodate the critical department titles, this would certainly result in a substantially smaller main sign without providing enough readability for the department names. NEW CORRESPONDENCE - BY APPLICANT While the applicant has the option to utilize the existing freestanding sign for identity, this is not an adequate solution. Titles that convey the services offered within the store must be installed on the primary storefront to be useful. Inclusion of department titles on an accessory freestanding sign have consistently proven to make such sign panels too busy and do not translate into effective wayfinding. Multiple department names on a freestanding sign are rarely found in within the city. It is well established that any identity on a freestanding sign panel needs to be limited to the most basic brand information. This makes the signs safer for drivers and dramatically less likely to be ignored, as human nature leads people to block out busy content. Especially while driving. Inclusion of the department titles on the building façade provides a location that can accommodate the modest additional size without creating any visual tension or safety issues. City of Anaheim Planning Department has suggested informally and formally that the existing non- conforming freestanding sign includes additional sign area for the store. Yet the applicant is not inclined to add the critical department names to the freestanding sign for the reasons mentioned above. The applicant took staff’s suggestion into consideration, but they declined to take that action because they are aware of the wayfinding impact and are certain it would not benefit the store. This decision was based on extensive experience over many years. More important, staff’s suggestion is based on what the applicant views as an opinion that lacks any data or evidence. Rejection of a request based solely on speculation about an outcome would not be fair to this store. See case information below. "Regulations affecting protected First Amendment activities must be justified by something more than "mere legislative preferences or beliefs respecting matters of public convenience" (Schneider v. State, supra, 308 U.S. 147, 161 [84 L.Ed. 155, 165]) and are constitutionally permissible "only if they are clearly and narrowly drawn to avoid arbitrary and unnecessary curtailment of freedom of speech...." (Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 19 Cal.3d 294, 303.) (2) The burden of establishing whether the regulation in question is sufficiently narrowly drawn in serving a compelling state interest is placed upon the government seeking to impose the regulation. (Verrilli v. City of Concord (9th Cir.1977) 548 F.2d 262, 265; Talley v. California (1960) 362 U.S. 60, 66-67 [4 L.Ed.2d 559, 563-564, 80 S.Ct. 536] (conc. opn.); Tribe, op. cit. supra, at p. 722, fn. 3.) These various circumstances work together to compound the issue of identity and functionality for Grocery Outlet signage. This combination of issues is not common in the C-G zone and not common citywide. 2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Inclusion of department names within total 193 square feet would force the applicant to install relatively smaller letter heights for the department titles and a smaller primary wall sign size. These reductions would prevent sufficient readability from the streets compared to similar businesses within the zone. Other grocery stores in the same zone are able to communicate their message with a minimum of identity. It can be argued that those stores could communicate to the public and thrive in any community without any department names or only with one or two, as the average citizen is aware of their branding and which services those stores provide. Without the specific requested titles: “Produce Dairy Meat Organics Wine”, the public does not automatically presume all of those services are offered within. Grocery Outlet would suffer a verifiable disadvantage because of this issue. The store has had difficulty competing with similar businesses in similar types of communities. This identity challenge, combined with the modest impact of the storefront’s visibility challenge is unique in the city. The applicant has not been able to find a similar type of business that suffers from the same issues. Therefore, other properties in this zone and citywide are not currently deprived of the ability to convey their message to the public in the way this store would experience with strictly conforming signage. Denial of the sign variance would result in a disparity of visibility privileges which competitors and other buildings and tenants enjoy. In determining special circumstances, the California Supreme Court has held that disparities between properties need not be physical, but may also include a disparate impact of land use regulations in a particular zone. Topanga Assoc for Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 520; Craik v. County of Santa Cruz (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 880, 890. In order to determine if special circumstances exist, and to assist the Planning Commission to arrive at a decision, please provide a letter of justification to answer each of the following questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, as fully and completely as possible. The letter should list each code section for which a variance is required including a brief description of the requirement. Justification must be provided for each separate variance request. 1. Identify any special physical characteristics of the property such as shape, topography, location or surroundings that cause the requested development to not meet zoning codes. Chapter 18.44.110.0101.05 in regard to wall signs states that “The maximum aggregate area of allowable wall signs per building elevation is limited to one square foot of sign area per lineal foot of that building elevation. Wall signs for individual tenants shall not exceed one square foot of area per lineal foot of said tenant’s building elevation”. Since the tenant’s building frontage is 193 lineal feet, it is entitled to a total of 193 square feet maximum sign area per code. Due to a combination of conditions at the site, the applicant requests the right to install 294.55 square feet of wall sign area in lieu of maximum of 193 square feet. A critical special circumstance is in regard to secondary signage, in the form of department names. The secondary department names are needed in addition to the primary business name. The Grocery Outlet identity includes five store department titles. The department titles are included because they are absolutely necessary to visually communicate the store’s message and purpose to the public. After extensive research and experience, Grocery Outlet has confirmed the department names are essential, and their exclusion will result in a material loss of adequate identification for the business. The inability to include the critical department names, in combination with the visibility issues at this site is not an ordinary condition found in the city. The issues that affect storefront signage are a combination of the following: A critical need for all relevant department names on the storefront; a partial obstruction of visibility to eastbound traffic along Lincoln Ave; and relatively deep setback from the street. These various circumstances work together to compound the issue of identity and functionality for Grocery Outlet signage. This combination of issues is not common in the C-G zone and not common citywide. 2. Do other properties in the vicinity have the same type of physical characteristics as this property? If so, please identify a few of them. The identity and visibility challenges conforming sign size creates is unique to this shopping center and is unique throughout the city. This situation creates a special circumstance. Other shopping centers of this size throughout the city are able to effectively communicate their storefront identities to the public. Although Grocery Outlet is an anchor and should be prominently located within the shopping center, conforming signage would result in limited visibility with the orientation of the shopping center impacting and compounding its visibility challenges. A similar site with this combination of challenges has not been identified in the city. Granting of the variance does not constitute a special privilege because the variance would give the storefront signage parity with other retail stores throughout the city. The net result of the variance would be signage that “complements the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape”. The size and scale the wall signs will be appropriate for the scale of the building frontage, the buildings located on the property and the surrounding land uses and zone. 3. Identify any other neighboring properties that have the same type of improvement that you are requesting. This identity challenge, combined with the modest impact of the storefront’s visibility challenge is unique in the city. The applicant has not been able to find a similar type of business that suffers from the same issues. Therefore, other properties in this zone and citywide are not currently deprived of the ability to convey their message to the public in the way this store would experience with strictly conforming signage. On the whole, the applicant posits that the proposed additional sign quantity is appropriately scaled to the storefront, fits well within the shopping center, and has a combined area and grouping that does not defy the spirit of the code. 4. Identify the cause of the special characteristics of the site that limits the ability to comply with code requirements (e.g. natural slope of the land, placement of other structures). Based on a visibility study of the storefront, there will be a reduced opportunity for visibility of the storefront to drivers from specific directions. Due to the layout of the shopping center, the subject storefront can receive no visibility from northbound Knott Ave. The storefront can receive no functional visibility to southbound drivers along Knott Ave. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave approaching the site are not able to see the storefront from the intersection of Lincoln Ave and Knott Ave because of the Chevron building and pole sign. Only when eastbound drivers are just about in front of the store along Lincoln Ave can they get an unobstructed view of the storefront. Westbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are able to obtain a modestly unobstructed view of the storefront as they approach the shopping center, yet there are some trees along the street that create intermittent blockages. At the closest distance from the Grocery Outlet storefront to the street is approximately 234’. Eastbound drivers along Lincoln Ave are approximately 320’ away from the storefront when around 45 degrees from perpendicular to the storefront as they approach the shopping center. Although the storefront and signage is visible to traffic, it is limited to a very short distance in the eastbound direction of traffic, and can only facilitate proper reaction times for westbound traffic. As the larger of two anchors in the shopping center, these two issues have an impact on the storefront and its signage. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2019-128 LOCATION: 1150-1178 Knollwood Circle and 2621-2651 Woodland Drive APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Jesus Perez of KPFF Consulting Engineers. The property owner is Matthew Hogan Hillerud of GHH Co, LLC. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a tentative parcel map to permit a one- lot, 31-unit commercial/industrial airspace condominium subdivision for the individual ownership of tenant spaces in two existing, one-story multi-tenant buildings. BACKGROUND: The subject property is developed with a 28,836 square foot commercial/industrial building at 2621-2651 Woodland Drive, and a second 25,085 square foot commercial/industrial building at 1150-1178 Knollwood Circle. The property has a General Plan designation of Industrial and a Zoning Classification of “I” Industrial. The property is surrounded by industrial uses to the north, east, and west, and commercial uses to the south. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a one-lot subdivision of the 3.73 acre project site to create a 31-unit commercial/industrial airspace subdivision which would allow for individual ownership of each unit for both of the existing commercial buildings. The buildings are 25,085 square feet and 28,386 square feet. No expansion of the existing commercial/industrial buildings are proposed under the project scope. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Tentative Parcel Map: Before the Planning Commission may approve the tentative parcel map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed subdivision of the property, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim. 2) That the proposed subdivision of the property, as show on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the Industrial Zoning District. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2019-128 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 3 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project. 4) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128 or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Tentative Parcel Map TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2019-128 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 3 The proposed subdivision will create separate air space units which will be individually owned. No physical modifications to the property or buildings are included with this application. The existing configuration of driveways and access ways provide adequate circulation and off-street parking. Staff has include a condition of approval in the draft resolution which will require recordation of a reciprocal easement for ingress and egress, parking, maintenance and trash pick- up for the entire property prior to recordation of the final map. The proposed subdivision would not cause substantial environmental damage, serious public health problems, not conflict with any existing easements, as the proposed parcel would remain industrially zoned in conformance with the Industrial land use designation in the General Plan. As part of the entitlement process, the applicant shall irrevocably offer to dedicate six feet along Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle, and a corner-cut off easement at the corner of Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle, for road, public utilities, and other public purposes. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within the Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions, 15315) Categorical Exemption. Class 15 consists of the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial uses into four or fewer parcels. This exemption applies when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available. In addition, the parcel cannot have been part of a division of a larger parcel within the previous two years, and the parcel’s average slope cannot be greater than 20 percent. The Project would permit a one-lot, 31-unit commercial airspace condominium subdivision for the individual ownership of tenant spaces in two existing, one-story multi-tenant office buildings. The Project is consistent with the Industrial General Plan land use designation and the Industrial (I) Zone. The subject property is one parcel and is not proposed to be subdivided to create additional parcels nor been subdivided within the past two years, and no special circumstances (i.e. variance or administrative adjustments) are required to process the request. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and 15315 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128. The commercial/industrial air space subdivision will be in compliance with the zoning and development standards of the Industrial zone and the goals of the General Plan. The proposed subdivision will include access easements to allow for adequate on-site circulation and parking and is sufficient to accommodate all of the uses on the site. Prepared by, Submitted by, Peter Lange David See Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Tentative Parcel Map Resolution 2. Tentative Parcel Map I DEV 2019-00054 INDUSTRIAL C-G RESTAURANT C-G ECONOLODGE ANAHEIM NORTH C-G OFFICES I MEDICAL OFFICE C-G RESTAURANT I OFFICES C-G IMPERIAL THEATER I NORTHGATE DISTRIBUTION CENTER I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIALI INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIALI INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL C-G RESTAURANT C-G RESTAURANT C-G OFFICES C-G OFFICES C-G OFFICES C-G SERVICE STATION N M A G N O L I A A V E W W O O D L A N D D R N K N O LL W O O D CIR W. LA PALMA AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N . M A G N O L I A A V E N . D A L E A V E . CRESCENT AVE . ORANGETHORPE AVE 1150-1 178 North Knollwo od Circ le and 2621-2 651 Wes t Woodland Drive DE V N o. 2019-00054 Subject Property APN: 070-772-13 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 N M A G N O L I A A V E W W O O D L A N D D R N KNOLLW OOD CIR W. LA PALMA AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N . M A G N O L I A A V E N . D A L E A V E . CRESCENT AVE . ORANGETHORPE AVE 1150-1 178 North Knollwo od Circ le and 2621-2 651 Wes t Woodland Drive DE V N o. 2019-00054 Subject Property APN: 070-772-13 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2019-128 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00054) (1150-1178 KNOLLWOOD CIRCLE AND 2621-2651 WOODLAND DRIVE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128 to permit a one-lot 31-unit commercial/industrial airspace subdivision (collectively referred to herein as the “Project”) on that certain real property located at 1150-1178 Knollwood Circle and 2621-2651 Woodland Drive in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the 3.69-acre Property is currently developed with two, single-story commercial/industrial buildings with a floor area of 25,085 and 28,386 square feet, is located in the Industrial (I) zone and has a General Plan land use designation of Industrial; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing have been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed Project to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of Projects which consists of the division of property meeting the conditions described in Section 15315 of Tittle 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“CEQA Guidelines”); that consists of the division of property in urbanized areas zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous two (2) years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. The Project complies with all of the conditions described in Section 15315 of the CEQA Guidelines. Accordingly, the proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2020-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to permit a one-lot 31-unit commercial/industrial air space subdivision, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed Project, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the Industrial land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan and, more specifically, the Industrial zone and with the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.10 of the Code for industrial uses. 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project. 3. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as no expansion is proposed to the existing office buildings. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence and reached these findings are due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128 contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Tentative Parcel Map No. 2019-128 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfied the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. - 3 - PC2020-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEM - 5 - PC2020-*** - 6 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2019-128 (DEV2019-00054) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL PARCEL MAP 1 The legal property owner shall submit an Encroachment License application to Public Works for review and approval for any encroachments within the public property along Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle. The Encroachment License shall be executed and submitted to the Public Works, Development Services prior to parcel map approval. Public Works, Development Services 2 The vehicular access rights to Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim, except as approved street openings. Public Works, Development Services 3 A maximum of 31 commercial/industrial airspace units may be permitted for the two, one-story office buildings. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 An improvement certificate shall be placed on the parcel map to indicate that all street, sewer and storm drain improvements along Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle per the latest version of Public Works City Standard requirements at the time of construction and as approved by the City Engineer shall be constructed prior to final building and zoning inspections as directed by the City Engineer for future building permit issuance. Public Works, Development Services 5 The legal property owner shall submit to the City for review and approval a Reciprocal Easement Agreement for the benefit of all parcels for parking, access, ingress and egress and sewer purposes. Public Works, Development Services 6 The developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, private drives, all common areas, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the parcel map. Public Works, Development Services 7 The parcel map shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and ensure that all applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works, Development Services 8 The developer shall post a Monumentation bond in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. Public Works, Development Services - 7 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 9 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 10 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 11 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 12 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water, if fire sprinkler system is required by Fire Department, shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 13 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water, if fire sprinkler system is required by Fire Department, shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 14 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 15 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 16 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim up to 6-ft. along Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle and a corner- cut off easement at the corner of Woodland Drive and Knollwood Circle as shown on the tentative parcel map for road, public utilities, and other public purposes. Public Works, Development Services GENERAL CONDITIONS 17 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 18 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division ∆ – – A T T A C H M E N T N O . 2 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 LOCATION: 1325 South Euclid Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Joseph Karaki of Karaki, Western States. The property owner is Rabih Azar. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a variance to permit a reduced front structural and landscape setback to construct a 3,853 square foot one story office building. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), and approving Variance No. 2019- 05126. BACKGROUND: The subject 0.35-acre vacant property is designated by the General Plan for Corridor Residential land uses and within the General Commercial (C-G) Zone. The property is bordered by commercial properties to the north, east, and south, and single-family residential dwellings to the west. PROPOSAL: The request is for a variance to permit a 10-foot structural and landscape setback within the front setback area whereas 15 feet is required by the Municipal Code. The application request also includes a development proposal to construct a new 3,853 square foot, single-story commercial office building on the 0.35-acre parcel. The office building would have three office suites, ranging from 1,225 square feet to 1,358 square feet and each suite would contain a designated office space area and restroom. The exterior design of the office building would incorporate neutral tone stucco elements of tan and grey, as well as stone veneer along the base of the building and metal panel elements along the roof line. The office development would have a total of 16 parking spaces with one parking space designated as handicapped and one designated clean air vehicle parking space; a total of 16 spaces are required. Access to the site would be from an existing 24-foot wide driveway located on Chalet Avenue and from the commercial parcel to the north through a joint reciprocal access agreement with the neighboring property owner. The perimeter and the parking area of the project site would be landscaped with various trees (strawberry tree and western red bud), shrubs (examples of blue hibiscus, English lavender, and African boxwood), and ground cover (redwood mulch and lantana). VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS: The applicant requests approval of a variance to permit a 10-foot side front structural and landscape setback were a 15-foot setback is required. The Planning Commission may grant the requested Variance upon a finding that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of special circumstances shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the development standards outlined in the Municipal Code and further analyzed in the attached Development Summary (Attachment No. 1). With the exception of the front structural and landscape setback reduction, the project complies with all required development standards of the C-G zone. A variance recognizes that there may be individual properties that, because of size, irregular shape, or unusual topography, cannot be reasonably developed if all the development standards for the zone are strictly applied. The project site is a vacant 15,013 square foot corner lot located along the intersection of Euclid Street and Chalet Avenue. The small size of the property makes it difficult to meet all of the development standards to accommodate an office development. Development of the project site would be further constrained based on the Public Works required ten-foot side yard dedication along Euclid Street, which reduces the lot width from 145 feet to 135 feet. The site is also a corner lot and as such, a 25-foot unobstructed radius along the two intersecting streets (i.e. Euclid Street and Chalet Avenue) would be required and would further reduce the potential development footprint. With a reduced side yard structural and landscape setback, the proposed office development would be consistent in terms of building placement with neighboring commercial buildings as the side yard setbacks of these buildings range from four to seven feet. Providing a 10-foot setback along the Euclid Street setback area would be adequate as it would a minor deviation in comparison to the required 15-foot setback and would provide a sufficient development of the site. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is a request for a Variance to allow a 10-foot side yard structural and landscape setback, where the Code requires a 15-foot structural and landscape setback, to construct a 3,853 square foot one-story office building; and, therefore, this exemption is applicable. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 3 CONCLUSION: Staff believes that granting the variance to permit a reduced front structural and landscape setback of 10 feet to accommodate the construction of the proposed office building would be compatible with the residential and commercial properties. Based on the stated justification, staff supports this request and recommends approval of the variance application. Prepared by, Submitted by, Peter Lange David See Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Development Summary 2. Draft Variance Resolution 3. Project Plans 4. Variance Justification C-G DEV 2019-00066 MEDICAL OFFICE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE T FIRE STATION RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 PALMILLA APARTMENTS 169 DU T ANAHEIM CITY LIBRARY EUCLID BRANCH RS-2 RELIGIOUS USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL O-L OFFICES RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 CHARLESTON SQUARE APARTMENTS 118 DU T LOARA HIGH SCHOOL O-L OFFICES C-G RETAIL C -G M E D I C A L O F F I C E C -G M E D I C A L O F F I C E C-G AUTO DEALERSHIP RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S E U C L I D S T W CHALET AVE W PALM LN W PALAIS RD S F A N N S T S F A L C O N S T W B OW L IN G S T W. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE S . E U C L I D S T S . W A L N U T S T S . B R O O K H U R S T S T W. CERRITOS AVE S . D I S N E Y L A N D D R 1325 So uth Euc lid Stree t DE V N o. 2019-00066 Subject Property APN: 128-384-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 S E U C L I D S T W CHALET AVE W PALM LN W PALAIS RD S F A N N S T S F A L C O N S T W B OW L IN G S T W. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE S . E U C L I D S T S . W A L N U T S T S . B R O O K H U R S T S T W. CERRITOS AVE S . D I S N E Y L A N D D R 1325 So uth Euc lid Stree t DE V N o. 2019-00066 Subject Property APN: 128-384-14 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Variance No. 2019-05126 C-G Development Standards Proposed Office Development Determination Floor Area Ratio 0.50 FAR 0.26 FAR Consistent Front Setback Ten (10) feet Ten (10) feet Consistent Side Setback Abutting any local street: 15 feet Abutting alleyway: 10 feet Street oriented setback: 10 feet Alley setback: 68’- 5” Street oriented setback inconsistent Rear Setback Abutting any non- residential interior site boundary line: None Rear property line abuts commercial zoned property. Zero foot setback proposed. Consistent Building Height Maximum three stories (38 feet) when 76-100 feet from single-family residential Twenty four (24) feet from exiting grade Consistent Parking Four (4) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area Sixteen (16) parking spaces Consistent Landscaping Front Setback: 10’ Rear Setback: None when abutting nonresidential Front Setback: 10’ Rear Setback: None All setbacks comply with landscaping requirement with exception to street oriented side yard. ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Side Setback: 15’ Alley side yard: 68’-5” Street Oriented setback: 10’ Side yard setback required 15’ and 10’ proposed Fencing Required Fences and Walls: Abutting Commercial: None Maximum Height 3 feet maximum for front or street setback 6 feet for rear or side yard setback 6-8 feet for abutting public alleyways Front yard 4’ CMU wall Side yard (alley adjacent) Existing 7’ tall cmu and wall fence Rear yard New 6’ CMU wall The side yard and rear yard fencing and materials are consistent with AMC requirements. A COA has been added which will require the existing 4’ tall front yard fence to comply with AMC fencing height requirements [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00066) (1325 SOUTH EUCLID STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Variance No. 2019-05126 to permit a structural and landscape front yard setback less than required by the Anaheim Muncipal Code to allow for the construction of a 3,853 square foot office building on certain real property located at 1325 South Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the property is approximately 0.35 acres in size and is currently undeveloped. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”). The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property as Corridor Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance No. 2019-05126 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of Projects (i.e., Class 3 – New Construction) which consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Variance No. 2019-05126, does find and determine that the required findings for approval of a Variance to allow for a reduced front yard structural and landscape setback can be made for the following reasons: - 2 - PC2020-*** SECTION NO. 18.08.060.010.0101&.0102 Minimum front structural and landscaped setback. (15 feet required; 10 feet proposed) 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Such circumstances include that development of the site would be restrictive due to the Euclid Street road widening which would reduce the width of the Project site from 145 feet to 135 feet. In addition, the Project site is a corner lot and as such, a 24-foot unobstructed radius along the two intersecting street (i.e. Euclid Street and Chalet Avenue) would be required and would further reduce potential development of the site. The requested ten (10) foot side yard setback would deviate slightly from the required fifteen (15) foot side yard setback requirement; however, the proposed Project would meet all other development requirements outlined in the C-G zone and would be closer to development code compliance than neighboring commercial buildings along Euclid Street which range from a side yard structural setback of four (4) feet to seven (7) feet. 2) That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because similar front landscape setback variances were previously- approved in 2018 for the service station located at the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Broadway, and in 2017 for the service station at the northeast corner of Beach Boulevard and Ball Road. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence and reached these findings are due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2019-05126 contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Variance No. 2019-05126 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfied the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. - 3 - PC2020-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2020-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEM - 5 - PC2020-*** - 6 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2019-05126 (DEV2019-00066) - 7 - PC2020-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 2 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, draining routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. All onsite utilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the property owner. The grading plan shall be labeled accordingly. Public Works Department, Development Services 3 Prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City’s adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project’s contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works Department, Development Services 4 The Owner shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works Department, Development Services 5 Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/Significant Redevelopment projects identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; defined Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff, and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Public Works Department, Development Services 6 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works Department, Development Services - 8 - PC2020-*** 7 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in State of California. Public Works Department, Development Services PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 8 Any relocation of City electronic facilities shall be at the developer’s expense. That landscape and/or hardscape screening of all pad-mounted equipment shall be required and shall be shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering 9 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 10 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 11 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 12 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 13 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape constructions. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 14 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works Department, Development Services - 9 - PC2020-*** 15 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the right- of-way easements described below: 7 ft. in width on Euclid Street Corner cutback at Euclid Street and Chalet Avenue Public Works Department, Development Services 16 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Development Services 17 The developer shall construct all improvements along the project’s frontage on Euclid Street or a cash-in-lieu payment will be accepted based on the project engineer’s cost estimate, in an amount approved by the City Engineer to be sufficient to pay for the future street widening in compliance with City Standard 160-A. The developer’s engineer shall submit to the City for review and approval an engineering cost estimate for the cost of the required improvements. Public Works Department, Development Services 18 The developer shall repair any damaged, broken, and lifted sidewalk in the perimeter of the property and shall reconstruct in accordance with City Engineering Standard Detail 110-B. These areas shall be identified on the improvement plans. Public Works Department, Development Services 19 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement which dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 20 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 21 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 22 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical services requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering - 10 - PC2020-*** 23 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 24 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works Department, Development Services PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION 25 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Development Services 26 All remaining impact fees including cash in-lieu of public improvements required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works Department, Development Services ON-GOING DURING OPERATIONS 27 The subject property shall be developed substantially in the accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which are on file with the Planning Department; provided however, that the signs shall display only advertising or business identification pertaining to on premise businesses, and that there shall be no display of any off-site uses, products or services on the signs. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 28 That ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site. Delivery vehicles shall not block any part of the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation GENERAL CONDITIONS 29 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 30 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 11 - PC2020-*** indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 31 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 32 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning Department, Planning Services Division LEGAL DESCRIPTION M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ _ T - 1 . 0 C O V E R S H E E T . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS KARAKI WSe RE V I S I O N DA T E 6Ä SHEET NUMBER JOB No CUP No 1 2 3 PR O P O S E D O F F I C E B U I L D I N G 13 2 5 S E U C L I D S T R E E T A N A H E I M C A 9 2 8 0 4 1 ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOLS GENERAL PROJECT NOTES SCALE:1 SHEET DESIGNATION 1/4" = 1'-0" Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 4:28 PM Fmendoza PLOT DATE:3.9.2020 SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION ARCHITECTURAL SHEET INDEX T-1.0 A-1.0 A-2.0 SCOPE OF WORK OWNER/CLIENT INFORMATION PROJECT TEAM DESIGN CIVIL DESIGN PROJECT DIRECTORY DEVELOPMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT POWER GAS PLANNING DIVISION SERVICES RABIH AZAR A N A H E I M APPLICABLE CODES POLICE DEPARTMENT ANAHEIM POLICE DEPT WASTE REPUBLIC SERVICES WATER LANDSCAPE DESIGN 128-384-14 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES M.E.P. DESIGN ZONING LAND USE TYPE OF CONST NUMBER OF STORY BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA BLDG HEIGHT AREA OF SITE BLDG SETBACKS FRONT (WEST) REAR (EAST) LEFT SD YD (NORTH) RIGHT SD ST (SOUTH) REQUIRED PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA FLOOR AREA RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT PARKING PROJECT DATA PARKING STANDARDS HANDICAP PARKING REQUIREMENTS FORMULA REQUIRED PROVIDED OTHER PARKING REQUIREMENTS CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING FORMULA SIZE REGULAR PARALLEL HANDICAP TYPE COMPACT PARKING REQUIREMENTS USE FORMULA REQUIRED PROVIDED TENANT 2 SPRINKLERS TENANT 1 TENANT 3 A-3.0 BUILDING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION CITY OF ANAHEIM FIRE DEPT ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITIES SOCAL GAS COMPANY ANAHEIM PUBLIC UTILITIES AS-1.0 CIVIL SHEET 1 SHEET 2 LANDSCAPE L0.01 L1.01 L2.01 L3.01 L4.01 L5.01 L5.02 PARKING COMPUTATION BUILDING DATA SURVEY SHEET 1 AFTER R.O.W. DEDICATION: BEFORE R.O.W. DEDICATION: AS-2.0 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 SCALE:1 SOUTH ELEVATION (@ CHALET AVE.) 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE:3 EAST ELEVATION (@EUCLID STREET) 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE:4 WEST ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE:2 NORTH ELEVATION 3/16" = 1'-0"ELEVATION KEYNOTES MATERIAL A B.1 CB J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO.DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ A - 3 . 0 E L E V S _ O F F I C E . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E99719 - RABIH AZAR PROPOSED 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 KARAKI WSe OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 3:55 PM Fmendoza 3.9.2020 - WS WS JK 3/16" = 1'-0" ':6'4+14 '.'8#6+105 #Ä ELEVATION KEYNOTES MATERIAL A B.1 C 1 2 4 B 102 103 201 202 301 302 101 P1 P3 P3 P3 P3 P3 P1 P1 P1 P3 P1 P3 P1 P3 P3 P1 P1 P3 P4 P4 P5 P5 P5 P5 TENANT-3 300 P6 P6 P 3 P 1 P 3 J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO.DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ A - 1 . 0 P L A N _ O F F I C E . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E99719 - RABIH AZAR PROPOSED 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 KARAKI WSe OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 3:54 PM Fmendoza 3.9.2020 - SCALE:1 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" WS WS JK 3/16" = 1'-0" (.1142.#0 56(.114 #Ä P3 P4 WALL LEGEND P1 P5 P6 J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO.DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ A - 2 . 0 R O O F P L A N _ O F F I C E . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E99719 - RABIH AZAR PROPOSED 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 KARAKI WSe OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 3:56 PM Fmendoza 3.9.2020 - WS WS JK 3/16" = 1'-0" 411(2.#0 #Ä ROOF FINISHES ROOF KEYNOTES SCALE:1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE NTSPARKING STRIPING DETAIL 2 SCALE NTS 3 DETAIL 1E DETAIL 2F PLANA ELEVATIONA ELEVATIONB ELEVATIONC ELEVATIOND SCALE 1/4" : 1'-0"TRASH ENCLOSURE 1 PLAN KEYNOTES MATERIAL ELEVATION KEYNOTES MATERIAL WS WS JK 09.12.17 AS SHOWN 5+6'&'6#+.5 #5Ä J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO.DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ A S - 2 . 0 S I T E D E T A I L S . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E99719 - RABIH AZAR PROPOSED 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 KARAKI WSe OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 4:22 PM Fmendoza 3.9.2020 - 0' J I H G F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 3 4 2 1 DESCRIPTIONNO.BY DATE REVISIONS SUBMITTAL OWNER NAME & ADDRESS PROJECT NAME & ADDRESS CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 A B C D E F G H 2 3 4 5 6 J 7 8 109 11 12 13 14 DRAWN BY: PLOT DATE: CHECKED BY: DATEBYNO.DESCRIPTION DESIGNED BY: SCALE: I JOB No CUP No M: \ _ C u r r e n t P r o j e c t s \ E 9 9 7 1 9 O f f i c e B l d g S . E u c l i d S t A N A H E I M C A \ _ C A D \ 1 . A r c h i t e c t u r a l \ S H E E T S \ A S - 1 . 0 S I T E P L A N . d w g CONSULTANT/ SEALS E99719 - RABIH AZAR PROPOSED 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 KARAKI WSe OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. EUCLID STREET ANAHEIM CA 92802 Plotted: Monday, March 09, 2020 4:23 PM Fmendoza 3.9.2020 - WS WS JK 1" = 10'-0" 241215'& 5+6'2.#0 #5Ä 1 LEGEND VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION WM SCALE:1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1" = 10'-0" 00 10'20' 128 - 384 - 14 SITE KEY NOTES 1 4 5 6B 7A 9 3 3A 5A 6A 2 3B 3C 3D 6C 8 7 14 15 13 12 17 2A 19 2B 2C 21 22 23 24 25 26 PROJECT SITE K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.KARAKIWS.COM Date January 10, 2020 To: Ms. Lucita Tong– Planner City of Anaheim Project: PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING 1325 S. Euclid Street Anaheim CA 92802 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CASE NO. PRE2019-00013 (DEV2019-00066) Subject: BUILDING SETBACK VARIANCE JUSTIFICATION LETTER Dear Ms. Tong, On behalf of the client, we would like to request a variance for the required front building setback for the proposed office building. This property was bought by the client, Mr. Rabih Azar( Razar 2-3 LLC ) in 2017 and at that time the property was being leased by a Nursery company. The Nursery company fenced the property with the proper permits obtained from and approved by the City of Anaheim. When the lease with the Nursery Company ended, the property was vacated and was cleaned by the the client Back in the 50’s, this property served as an alternative entry/exit to the northside of the adjacent property since the entry/exit at Euclid was not sufficient to serve the on going traffic for the tenants and its customers. This alternative entry/exit is along Chalet having two driveways. Less than a year ago, the City of Anaheim did some ROW work on the sidewalk along Chalet Avenue and removed one of the existing driways closer to Euclid Street without the knowledge of the client. Being vacant and unused for quite some time now, the client wants now to develop and improve this vacant lot. But due to the nature of the lot being small that this variance on the building setback is being requested. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.KARAKIWS.COM Per Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.060, the required building setback abutting any Arterial Highway (Euclid Street) shall be 15 feet, whereas the proposed project will only have 8 feet building setback. The following answers to the justifications are as follows: 1. Identify any special physical characteristics of the property such as shape, topography, location or surroundings that cause the requested development to not meet zoning codes. The project site has an existing area of only 0.34 acre. But due to the proposed Euclid Street ROW widening, the property shall be further reduced from a depth of 145’ to 135’ thus taking away 10’ off the property at the eastern side. In Addition to this, the corner lot sight clearance requirements will also reduce the property even further. Because of these issues stated above, the already small lot size makes it difficult to develop the project site to the maximum allowable FAR of 0.35 and deprives the client of maximizing the use of the property for the proposed office building. 2. Do other properties in the vicinity have the same type of physical characteristics as this property? If so, please identify a few of them. -Several existing buildings in the vicinity of the project site have currently less than 15’ building setback as well as not having any ROW dedications (see image below) PROJECT SITE A B C D E G F K A R A K I l WESTERN STATES 4887 E. LA PALMA AVE. STE 707 ANAHEIM CA 92807 T: 714-695-9300 F: 714-693-1002 WWW.KARAKIWS.COM ADJACENT PROPERTIES A. 1333 S. EUCLID ST B. 1311 S. EUCLID ST C. 1309 S. EUCLID ST D. 1307 S. EUCLID ST E. 1243 S. EUCLID ST F. 1300 S. EUCLID ST G. 1314 S. EUCLID ST 3. Identify any other neighboring properties that have the same type of improvement that you are requesting. -The properties to the north and south and east of the project site have the same office uses. As per image and list of adjacent properties above, the same offices uses are A, B, C, D, E & G A. 1333 S. EUCLID ST B. 1311 S. EUCLID ST C. 1309 S. EUCLID ST D. 1307 S. EUCLID ST E. 1243 S. EUCLID ST G. 1314 S. EUCLID ST 4. Identify the cause of the special characteristics of the site that limits the ability to comply with code requirements (e.g. natural slope of the land, placement of other structures). -As stated on item-1 above, the ROW widening and corner sight clearance requirements reduces the project site significantly and limits the development of the project to the allowed extent and deprives the client of maximizing the use of the property for the proposed office building. We hope that City Planning Department will grant this request for the building setback variance. Thank you Joseph Karaki PRESIDENT jkaraki@westernsec.com 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2020-06056 VARIANCE NO. 2020-05138, AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2020-00152 LOCATION: 2790 West Lincoln Avenue (Convenience Store and 76 Service Station) APPLICANT: The applicant and agent is Joseph Karaki of Western States Engineering, representing the owner, Paul Nikolau of The Nikolau Living Trust. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: 1) A Conditional Use Permit to demolish an existing commercial building and construct a new service station and convenience store; 2) A Variance to allow front landscape setback, interior structural and landscape setbacks, and maximum building height adjacent to a residential zone less than required by the Municipal Code; and 3) An associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption in the convenience store. BACKGROUND: The applicant submitted a request to continue the public hearing for this item an additional six weeks to the Planning Commission meeting of June 8, 2020. The applicant is currently working to address public comments that were received from the surrounding community regarding the proposed development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing for the subject project to the meeting of June 8, 2020. Prepared by, Submitted by, Jose Barriga David See Planner Principal Planner C-G DEV 2019-00160 RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4 MOROCCO APARTMENTS 35 DU RM-4 ADELPHI APARTMENTS 35 DU RM-4 LINDALE VILLA APARTMENTS 88 DU RM-4 VILLA DEL SOL APARTMENTS 207 DU C-G RETAIL C-G SERVICE STATION C-G BROOKDALE 117 DU RM-4 NORMANDY APARTMENTS 70 DU C-G RETAIL T (MHP) WESTERN SKIES TRAILER PARK T SCHWEITZER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL O.C.F.C.D. RM-4 VILLA DEL SOL APARTMENTS 207 DU RM-4 WESTDALE APTS 16 DU C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-3 DALE VILLAS TOWNHOMES 14 DU RM-3 TOWNHOMES 14 DU O.C.F.C.D. T VACANT T (MHP) LIBERTY TRAVEL PARK RM-4 CROSSINGS AT CHERRY ORCHARDS APARTMENTS 45 DU RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G ANAHEIM NATIONAL INN C-G RELIGIOUS USE T (MHP) WESTERN SKIES TRAILER PARK RM-4 FRANCISCAN APARTMENTS 70 DU C-G RETAIL W LIN COLN AVE S D A L E A V E N D A L E A V E W LIN COL N AVE N S Y R A C U S E S T S S U N S E T V I A W OCEAN VIA S S U N R I S E V I A W MOUNTAIN VIA W. LINCOLN AVE W. ORANGE AVE W. BROADWAY W. CRESCENT AVE S . D A L E A V E . CRESCENT AVE S . W E S T E R N A V E W. LINCOLN AVE 2790 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2019-00160 Subject Property APN: 126-022-02 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 W LIN COLN AVE S D A L E A V E N D A L E A V E W LIN COL N AVE N S Y R A C U S E S T S S U N S E T V I A W OCEAN VIA PRIVATE ST S S U N R I S E V I A W MOUNTAIN VIA P R I V A T E S T W. LINCOLN AVE W. ORANGE AVE W. BROADWAY W. CRESCENT AVE S . D A L E A V E . CRESCENT AVE S . W E S T E R N A V E W. LINCOLN AVE 2790 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2019-00160 Subject Property APN: 126-022-02 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 From:Joseph Karaki To:Jose Barriga Subject:RE: Request for Continuance Date:Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:53:55 PM Attachments:image001.png Jose, June 8th is better. At least we will know status of Covid 19 on economy as well. Best Regards, Joseph Karaki I PRESIDENT jkaraki@karakiws.com 4887 E. La Palma Ave | Suite 707 Anaheim, Ca 92807 T 714 695 9300 | 714 693 1002 | F www.karakiws.com “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.” -Vladimir Lenin- From: Jose Barriga [mailto:JBarriga@anaheim.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:51 PM To: Joseph Karaki Subject: RE: Request for Continuance Hello Joseph, The upcoming PC meeting dates are as follows: · May 11th · May 25th · June 8th Did you have a preference as to which date in May or June? Best, Jose From: Joseph Karaki <jkaraki@karakiws.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:33 PM To: Jose Barriga <JBarriga@anaheim.net> Subject: RE: Request for Continuance Hello Jose, Thank you for the follow up. I would prefer to have PC hearing end of May or first week of June. Best Regards, Joseph Karaki I PRESIDENT jkaraki@karakiws.com 4887 E. La Palma Ave | Suite 707 Anaheim, Ca 92807 T 714 695 9300 | 714 693 1002 | F www.karakiws.com “There are decades where nothing happens; and there are weeks where decades happen.” -Vladimir Lenin- From: Jose Barriga [mailto:JBarriga@anaheim.net] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:31 PM To: Joseph Karaki Subject: Request for Continuance Good afternoon Mr. Karaki, Based on our last conversation you had expressed interest in request a 2 week continuance of DEV2019-00160 from the April 27th to May 11th Planning Commission. Can you please provide me with an email confirming this request? Sincerely, Jose Jose Barriga Planner Anaheim Planning and Building Department │ Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard │ Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 E-mail jbarriga@anaheim.net Planning Services | Zoning Code | Zoning Information | Permit Forms and Applications California’s current directive to stay at home, except for essential exceptions, is in effect until further notice. Anaheim City Hall and other City facilities are currently closed to the public. The City is following the State’s directive and will continue to provide updates on the public reopening of City Hall, libraries, community centers and other places as they come available. During this closure, Anaheim staff will continue to provide service to our residents and businesses. Please click here or visit https://www.anaheim.net/5464/City-Hall-Services-During-Coronavirus for City Hall services in this unique time. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 27, 2020 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 LOCATION: This property is located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street (1600 West Lincoln Avenue). APPLICANT/AGENT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and the property owner is KNT I Enterprises, LLC, represented by Greg McCafferty and Michael Wallace. The agent is Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, represented by Lindsay Ortega. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following zoning entitlements: 1) A General Plan Amendment to amend the land use designation from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High; 2) A Zoning Reclassification to apply “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone to the existing “C-G” General Commercial base zone; 3) A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the construction of a mixed-use development consisting of a 315 residential units (apartments) with a 2,031 square-foot leasing office, a 3,413 square- foot retail space and a parking structure with modified development standards; and 4) A Development Agreement to permit a voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs (i.e. Senior Safety Net Program). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001; and, by motion, recommend that the City Council approve Reclassification No. 2018-00316 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 and determine that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act, and approve and adopt the resolution for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) No. 366. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 2 of 9 BACKGROUND: This 5.25-acre site is comprised of three contiguous parcels, and is currently developed with automobile related uses, which includes an automobile dealership and automobile and recreational repair and storage facilities. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding uses include commercial and industrial uses to the north, across Lincoln Avenue, commercial and light industrial uses to the east, across Loara Street, commercial and multi-family residential uses to the west, and commercial, multi-family residential and an elementary school to the south. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to demolish the existing automobile related facilities and construct a four story mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartments), a 2,031 square foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot commercial spaces and a parking structure, using the Mixed-Use Overlay zone development standards. The residential portion of the proposed project is comprised of 64 studio units, 135 one-bedroom units, and 116 two-bedroom units, ranging between 592 square feet and 1,104 square feet in size. The proposed commercial spaces are located on the ground floor, at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. Anticipated tenants are general retail and fast casual restaurants. The proposed building would be 72 feet, 6 inches at its highest point, which is located at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The proposed mixed-use building wraps around the proposed parking structure, which is 47 feet to top of parapet and 54 feet, 4 inches to top of elevator overrun. The proposed project provides a total of 639 parking spaces, of which 636 spaces are provided in the proposed parking structure and three spaces are provided as surface parking spaces located near the leasing office. Of this total, 611 spaces would be designated for residential units (532 resident spaces and 79 residential guest spaces) and 28 spaces would be available for commercial and leasing office visitors. As required by the Code, a parking demand study was prepared and determined that the proposed 639 parking spaces are sufficient to accommodate the proposed project. Vehicular ingress and egress would be provided by a total of four access driveways, two on Lincoln Avenue and two on Loara Street. The primary access would be provided by the eastern driveway on Lincoln Avenue and the northern driveway on Loara Street. The other two driveways would serve as service lanes for sanitation services, emergency vehicles, and/or move-in trucks. An 8- foot right-of-way dedication would be required along Lincoln Avenue to accommodate a new 5- foot parkway, 5-foot sidewalk and a future bike lane. Additional public right-of-way improvements include 45-foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue westbound left-turn lane beyond the railroad tracks, 100-foot extension of the Loara Street northbound left-turn lane, and a 145- foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue eastbound right turn lane. The project site would be secured with new perimeter walls and fences. A total of 59,849 square feet of recreational area would be provided, of which 43,196 square feet would be provided in the common area. The common recreational areas include a main courtyard area with a pool, spa, a half basketball court, a barbeque area, three smaller courtyards with barbeque areas and seating areas, a dog park and a spa, a fitness center, two club rooms, and one multi-use recreational room. The Code requires a total recreational area of 59,800 square feet. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 3 of 9 Site Plan Conceptual Rendering – View from the Corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street N GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 4 of 9 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested entitlement action: General Plan Amendment: The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan is the guide for the City’s future development. It designates the distribution and location of specific land uses and establishes the permitted densities for each land use designation. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment in order to redesignate the property from General Commercial to Mixed- Use High land uses. Before the Planning Commission may recommend approval of a General Plan Amendment to the City Council, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; 2) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; 3) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and 4) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. Staff believes that consideration of a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the site to a mixed- use land use is appropriate. Under the proposed Mixed-Use High land use designation, the applicant proposes a mixed-use development consisting of a 315 apartment units and 3,413 square- foot of commercial space that is intended for uses such as retail, small markets, and fast casual restaurants. The project site is located within an area that consists of a mixture of uses, which includes a variety of commercial uses and light industrial uses, a school, and multi-family residential uses (apartments). Staff believes that the requested Mixed-Use High land use designation would be compatible with and be complementary to other complimentary retail uses (i.e. Target store), the existing industrial uses (i.e. offices, warehouses), and other residential uses in the area, including another development project located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street that was recently reviewed by the Planning Commission. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested General Plan Amendment. The Land Use Element describes the Mixed-Use High designation as providing a mix of uses including residential, commercial, services, hotel and professional offices uses in a high-quality environment. The permitted density range for residential component of mixed-use development is from zero to 60 dwelling units per gross acre, and non-residential component of mixed-use development is permitted at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.35. The proposed project would have a residential density of 60 dwelling units per acre and 0.01 FAR for non-residential component. The proposed modification to the General Plan also supports the following General GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 5 of 9 Plan policies intended to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs: o Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. o Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations. o Goal 3.2: Maximize development opportunities along transportation routes. o Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses. o Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development. o Goal 7.1: Address the jobs-housing relationship by developing housing near job centers and transportation facilities. Reclassification: The project site is comprised of three parcels with a “C-G” General Commercial zoning classification. The project includes a proposed General Plan Amendment to Mixed-Use High as described above, and the implementing zone would be “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone. Accordingly, the applicant proposes to reclassify the property to apply the “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone over the existing “C-G” General Commercial zone. Staff supports this request because the proposed “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone would comply with the proposed Mixed- Use High land use designation. Conditional Use Permit: With the proposed Reclassification, the project would be subject to the “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay and “C-G” General Commercial base zoning requirements. In these zones, mixed-use developments require approval of a conditional use permit, and development standards such as setbacks may be modified as part of the required conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications promote increased pedestrian activity, provide for a unified street frontage, ensure privacy and light for residential uses, provide for public spaces, and promote compatibility with existing development. Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit for a mixed-use development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The uses within the project are compatible; 2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing buildings conform with the provisions of this title; 3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 6 of 9 5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7) The project complies with the General Plan and any applicable zoning or specific plan; and 8) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The project complies with the development standards of the “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone with the exception of interior setback requirement. The applicant is requesting to modify the minimum required interior structural and landscape setbacks along the west property line that abuts the neighboring multi-family residential zone. Setbacks for projects in the Mixed-Use Overlay zone may be modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications promote increased pedestrian activity, provide for a unified street frontage, ensure privacy and light for residential uses, provide for public spaces, and promote compatibility with existing development. The following table summarizes proposed setback modifications: Types of Setback Required Setback* Proposed Setbacks Interior Setback - Structural (Adjacent to Residential Zone Boundary) 101 ft. (4 story building) 12 ft. 7 in. to 40 ft. Interior Setback - Landscape (Adjacent to Residential Zone Boundary) 10 ft. 10 ft.; however, pedestrian walkways encroach into the setback * “MU” Overlay zone defers to the setback requirements of the base zone, which is “C-G” General Commercial for the proposed project. The applicant is proposing a minimum structural setback of 12’-7” along the interior property lines that abuts a residential zone, instead of the required 101-foot structural setback. The intent of the 101-foot structural setback is to ensure that there is sufficient separation between a 4-story commercial development and a residential use to reduce potential impact of the commercial development on the neighboring residential use. Although located in a commercial base zone, the proposed project consists of multi-family residential uses where the reduced setback is proposed, which is compatible with the neighboring multi-family residential use (apartments). Also, the existing apartment building is located approximately 65 feet from the property lines, which provides additional separation from the proposed project, ensuring sufficient privacy and livability for both the residents of the existing apartment and the future residents. As such, staff believes that the proposed setback reduction is appropriate. In addition, the applicant is proposing a meandering walkway that encroaches into the required 10-foot landscape setback area along the west property line that abuts a residential zone. Staff is supportive of this request as the proposed walkway provides pedestrian access for the future residents to on-site amenities (i.e. the dog park), is well integrated into the landscape design and does not significantly reduce the landscape area. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 7 of 9 Development Agreement: A Development Agreement is a contract for development which provides a property owner or developer a vested right to proceed with an approved development, “freezing” the entitlement along with established regulations and fees, in exchange for the City obtaining benefits beyond what would otherwise be required by existing regulations and ordinances. State law allows cities and project applicants to enter into a Development Agreement for their mutual benefit. The proposed development agreement would provide the applicant with the certainty desired to develop the project and in return would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs, such as recently created Senior Safety Net program. In 1982 the City Council approved a resolution establishing procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements. This resolution identifies four items necessary for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council. These items are: 1) The proposed development agreement is consistent with the General Plan; 2) The proposed development agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the proposed project is and will be located; 3) The proposed development agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; and 4) The proposed development agreement is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Staff believes that the proposed project and development agreement meet the requirements listed above. As described in this report, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, as proposed to be amended, and compatible with the surrounding uses and regulations of the “MU” Overlay zone, allowing for orderly development. Also, the proposed development agreement would serve to provide surety for the developer and includes benefits to the City by providing funding for affordable housing programs. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the development agreement. Affordable Housing: In 2018, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-106, which is a policy statement that encourages a dialogue between City staff and residential developers to consider options and approaches for addressing the City’s affordable housing needs. Pursuant to the resolution, City staff and the applicant discussed potential options to support the creation of affordable housing. Although the applicant decided not to provide any on-site affordable units, the applicant has offered to provide a voluntary financial contribution in an amount of $300,000 to assist in the City’s affordable housing programs. Such funding would be used to fund the City’s affordable housing programs such as the recently created Senior Safety Net program, which is a pilot program that offers emergency financial help, assistance paying monthly rent, and counseling and service referrals to prevent housing challenges among seniors. Details of this voluntary financial contribution is included in the proposed Development Agreement (Attachment 6). GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 8 of 9 Community Outreach and Correspondence: The applicant mailed out a project information brochure to adjacent property owners of properties located within close proximity of the project site on April 15, 2020. In addition, a project notification sign was posted in accordance with the City’s “Sunshine Ordinance.” No public comments were received as of the date of this report. Environmental Impact Analysis: An Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to identify necessary mitigation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The IS/MND was circulated to public agencies and interested parties on March 26, 2020, for a 20-day comment period. Two written comments were received as a result of the public notification. None of the comments received resulted in the need to recirculate the MND or to prepare an environmental impact report. Attachment 13 (Response to Comments) provides the comments received on the IS/MND and responses to these comments. Also, the City’s Public Works Department recommended modifications to the mitigation measures related to transportation (MM TRAF-1 and MM TRAF-2) during the public comment period. Mitigation measures have been identified in the IS/MND and are included in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 366, attached to this report (Attachment 8). These mitigation measures are related to air quality, cultural resources, geology and soils, noise, transportation, and tribal cultural resources. The mitigation measures are being recommended to the Planning Commission as conditions of approval in the attached draft conditional use permit resolution for the approval of the proposed project. With implementation of these measures, the IS/MND concluded that project impacts will be reduced to levels considered less than significant and there would be no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. In addition, the Noise Impact Analysis that was completed for the IS/MND included an acoustical analysis to ensure that the proposed project would comply with the maximum exterior and interior noise level standards established in Section 18.40.090 of the Zoning Code. Based on the analysis, the proposed project would comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code if certain improvements are incorporated into the project design. Such improvements include installation of sound walls of certain height along certain property lines and utilization of windows and doors with certain Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings. These improvements have been incorporated into the project design. The conditions of approval includes provisions requiring building permit plans to show all necessary measures recommended by the acoustical analysis to comply with the requirements of the Zoning Code. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 April 27, 2020 Page 9 of 9 CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is designed in a manner that will provide a quality living environment for its future residents and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. Staff recommends approval of the proposed request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Joanne Hwang, AICP David See Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Development Summary 2. Draft Planning Commission General Plan Amendment and Development Agreement Resolution a. Draft Development Agreement 3. Draft City Council MND Resolution 4. Draft City Council Reclassification Ordinance 5. Draft City Council Conditional Use Permit Resolution 6. Mitigated Negative Declaration 7. Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 366 8. Letter of Request 9. Parking Study 10. Applicant’s Letter of Justifications 11. Project Plans 12. Project Information Brochure 13. Response to Comments C-G DEV 2017-00128 AUTO SALES, REPAIR, STORAGE C-G CAR WASH T VACANT C-G VACANT RM-4 PAMPAS APARTMENTS 77 DU T LOARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C-G RETAIL C-G AUTO REPAIR I INDUSTRIALC-G VACANTC-G RETAIL C-G AUTO REPAIR I BREWERY I OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE I OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL I FAIRMONT PRIVATE SCHOOL C-G VACANT I INDUSTRIAL I OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE I INDUSTRIAL T SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE T VACANT C-G RETAIL RM-4 PAMPAS LANE APARTMENTS 40 DU RM-4 PALM WEST APTS 20 DU RM-4 PARK PLACE APTS 20 DU RM-4 GEI LING APARTMENTS 41 DU RM-4 HAWAIIAN APTS 30 DU C-G MEDICAL OFFICE C-G VACANT C-G VACANT C-G VACANT C-G VACANT RAILROAD C-G VEHICLE STAGING C-G AUTO STORAGE I OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE I OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE I OFFICE/ WAREHOUSE I OFFICE/ INDUSTRIAL W W L I N C O L N AV E W LI N COL N AV E S L O A R A S T W PAM PA S L N W M A B LE S T N L O A R A S T W E MBA S SY S T N MANCHESTER CT S . E U C L I D S T W. LINCOLN AVE S . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . H A R B O R B L V D W . B R O A D W A Y S . W A L N U T S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . E U C L I D S T S . M A N C H E S T E R A V E N . L O A R A S T W. BROADWAY W.L I N COL N A V E 1600 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2017-00128 Subject Property APN: 250-091-10 250-091-09 250-091-11 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 W W L I N C O L N AV E W LI N COL N AV E S L O A R A S T W PAM PA S L N W M A B LE S T N L O A R A S T W E MBA S SY S T N MANCHESTER CT S . E U C L I D S T W. LINCOLN AVE S . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . H A R B O R B L V D W . B R O A D W A Y S . W A L N U T S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . E U C L I D S T S . M A N C H E S T E R A V E N . L O A R A S T W. BROADWAY 1600 Wes t Linc oln Av enue DE V N o. 2017-00128 Subject Property APN: 250-091-10 250-091-09 250-091-11 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial P hoto: May 2019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEV2017-00128 Development Standard Proposed Project MU Overlay & C-G Base Zone Standards Site Area 5.25 acres None Density 60 du/acre for residential 0.01 FAR for non-residential Up to 60 du/acre for residential Up to .35 FAR for non-residential Unit Sizes • Studio: 592 to 671 sq. ft. • 1-bed: 703 to 884 sq. ft. • 2-bed: 898 to 1,104 sq. ft. • Studio: 550 sq. ft. min • 1-bed: 700 sq. ft. min • 2-bed: 825 sq. ft. min Building Height 72 ft. 4 in. 75 ft. Street Setback (both landscape and structural) Lincoln Avenue • Building: 16 ft. • Patios: 16 ft. 3 in. 15 ft. min Loara Street • Buildings: 13 ft. • Patios: 10 ft. 1 in. 10 ft. min Interior Setback (structural) Adjacent to Residential Zone 10 ft.* 101 ft. min Adjacent to Non-Residential Zone 36 ft. None Interior Setback (landscape) Adjacent to Residential Zone 10 ft.** 10 ft. min Adjacent to Non-Residential Zone 4 ft. 10 in. None Building to Building Setback 50 ft. 50 ft. min. for primary elevations Parking 639 spaces (636 spaces in garages, 3 surface spaces) 639 spaces (established by a parking study) Recreational-Leisure area 59,849 sq. ft. 59,800 sq. ft. min General Storage Space 100 cu. ft. min/du 100 cu. ft. min/du * Proposed setback modification under CUP ** Applicant is requesting a walkway to encroach into the landscape setback area ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523 AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND KNT I ENTERPRISES, LLC. (DEV2017-00128) (1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65864) of the Government Code of the State of California (herein referred to as the “Statute”) authorizes a city to enter into a contract which is called a development agreement in order to establish with certainty what regulations will govern the construction of a development; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “City Council”), as a charter city, enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the “Enabling Ordinance”), making the City subject to the Statute; and WHEREAS, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65865 of the Statute, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the “Procedures Resolution”), establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of development agreements by the City upon receipt of an application therefor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523") and a Development Agreement (“Development Agreement No. 2019-00001), for that certain real propert y located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street and commonly referred to as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), for the purpose of allowing the applicant to construct mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 and Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is proposed in conjunction with a request for (i) Reclassification No. 2018-00316 to reclassify the property to apply the “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay Zone over the existing “C-G” General Commercial Base Zone; and (ii) Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 to permit a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure, with modified development standards. General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and - 2 - PC2020-*** WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 5.25 acres in size. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.32 (Mixed-Use Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 proposes to amend "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate the Property from the "General Commercial" to the "Mixed-Use High" land use designation; and WHEREAS, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is proposed to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on March 26, 2020, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. On March 16, 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local emergency regarding Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and in conjunction with this action closed the City Hall and the Public Libraries to public access. Therefore the IS/MND was not available in these locations, but was made available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 366"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and - 3 - PC2020-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on April 27, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, does hereby find: 1. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan, as the proposed modifications to the General Plan are consistent with Goals 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 4.1, 6.1, and 7.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs, to pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations, to maximize development opportunities along transportation routes, to promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding neighborhoods, to enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development, and to address the jobs-housing relationship by development housing near job centers and transportation facilities; 2. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed amendment to the Anaheim General Plan would result in residential and commercial development opportunities that would be compatible with the existing commercial and multi-family residential uses within the vicinity of the project; 3. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 would maintain the balance of land uses within the City because the proposed amendment would provide quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs and would be compatible with and complementary to these surrounding land uses to the east, west, north and south; and 4. That the Property to be re-designated by proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2018- 00523 is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses because the project is designed to complement the surrounding land uses. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the Development Agreement No. 2019-0000100523, does hereby further find and determine that proposed Development Agreement meets all of the standards and requirements set forth in the Procedures Resolution, which was adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982, that is: - 4 - PC2020-*** 1. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is consistent with the General Plan, upon adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, now pending, and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in the General Plan; 2. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the Project is and will be located, upon adoption of Reclassification No. 2018-00316, now pending; 3. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; 4. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as it will provide funding to the City’s affordable housing programs; and 5. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under, is entered into pursuant to, and is in compliance with the City’s charter powers, the requirements of Section 65867 of California Government Code and the Procedures Resolution. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B and Development Agreement No. 2019-00001, in the form presented at this meeting, contingent upon and subject to the approval of (1) Reclassification No. 2018-00316 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, now pending; (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 366 for the Project; and (3) the conditions of approval associated with Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 5 - PC2020-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2020-*** - 7 - PC2020-*** EXHIBIT “B” ATTACHMENT NO. 2a -1- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2018-00523, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2019-00001 (DEV2017-00128) (1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive a verified petition for General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018- 00316, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, and Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 to demolish existing buildings and construct a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure, with modified development standards (the "Proposed Project"), on that certain real propertylocated at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street and commonly referred to as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 5.25 acres in size. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.32 (Mixed-Use Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Project is to construct a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure with modified development standards subject to approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 18.32.030 (Uses), of Chapter 18.32 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Code; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 is to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2018-00316 is to reclassify the property to apply “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay Zone over the existing “C-G” General Commercial Zone; and WHEREAS, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 proposes to provide the developer a vested right to develop the Proposed Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316, and Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs; and ATTACHMENT NO. 3 -2- WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on March 26, 2020, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. On March 16, 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local emergency regarding Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and in conjunction with this action closed the City Hall and the Public Libraries to public access. Therefore the IS/MND was not available in these locations, but was made available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 366"). A complete copy of MMP No. 366 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on April 27, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by its motion, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA -3- Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP No. 366, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 366; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ____________day of __________, 2020, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including MMP No. 366 and the comments received to date and the responses prepared, the City Council does find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMP No. 366, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project; 3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impacts upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 366 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. ;and WHEREAS, this City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the evidence received to date, does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the -4- Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) based on the findings and determinations as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMP No. 366, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 366 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council; 3. That the City Council hereby approves and adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 366; and 4. That the City Council authorizes and directs City staff to file with the Clerk of the County of Orange a Notice of Determination in accordance with Section 15075(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR OF THE CITY OFANAHEIM ATTEST: ___________________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -5- -6- “EXHIBIT B” 600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM NO. 366 Project Name: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development (DEV2017-00128) Project Location: The Proposed Project is located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (APNs 250-091- 09, 250-09110 and 250-091-11), in the north western portion of Anaheim, approximately 25 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles. The Proposed Project encompasses approximately 5.25 acres. The Proposed Project is located south of Lincoln Avenue, west of South Loara Street, north of West Broadway, and east of Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim. Address: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue CEQA Action: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative was prepared to identify any potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project and incorporate mitigation measures into the Proposed Project as necessary to eliminate the potentially significant effects of the Proposed Project or to reduce the effects to a level of less than significant.) Entitlement Requests: A General Plan Amendment (GPA2018-00523) to re-designate the Project Site from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High; A zoning reclassification (RCL2018-00316) to apply Mixed-Use Overlay over the existing General Commercial base zone; A Conditional Use Permit (CUP2018-05979) to allow a mixed-use project and reduced interior structural and landscape setbacks adjacent to residential use; and A Development Agreement (DAG2019-00001) for the proposed voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs (i.e. Senior Safety Net Program). Project Description: KNT I Enterprises, LLC (Applicant) proposes to demolish existing auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility, and construct a mixed-use development consisting of a 381,525 square foot (SF) mixed-use building, which wraps around a 239,072 SF parking structure. Uses within the proposed building includes 315 residential apartment (rental) units, a 2,031 sq. ft. leasing office for the apartment units and 3,413 sq. ft. of retail space (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project would have 639 on-site parking spaces; 636 spaces in the parking structure and three (3) surface spaces. The Proposed Project is located on 5.25-acres of land consisting of three parcels, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 250-091-09, 250-091-10 and 250-091-11 located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue (Project Site). -7- Terms and Definitions: 1. Property Owner/Developer – Owner or developer of 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Project. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed "environmental equivalent/timing" and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be done by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City's adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit – For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. -8- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION III. AIR QUALITY MM AIR-1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the building plans and require that the painting contractor for the interior areas of the residential portion of Proposed Project shall utilize “Super-Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 and contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. A list of “Super-Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural-coatings/super-compliant- coatings . Planning and Building Department/Building Division MM AIR-2 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans and require that off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. Planning and Building Department/Building Division IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES MM CUL-1 Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall provide a note on plans indicating and require, that in the event that any evidence of cultural resources is discovered during ground-disturbing activities, all work within the vicinity of the find shall stop until a qualified archaeological consultant can assess the find and make recommendations. Project Applicant shall not attempt excavation of potential cultural resources. The qualified archaeologist shall ensure that the Proposed Project complies with the following measures: Planning and Building Department/Building Division -9- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION • Prior to any ground disturbance, the qualified archaeologist, or their designee, shall provide a worker environmental awareness protection (WEAP) training to construction personnel regarding regulatory requirements for the protection of cultural (prehistoric and historic) resources. As part of this training, construction personnel shall receive proper procedures to follow if unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during construction. Workers will have contact information and protocols to follow in the event of any inadvertent discoveries. The WEAP training can be in the form of a video or PowerPoint presentation. Printed literature (handouts) can accompany the training and given to new workers and contractors to avoid continuous training over the course of the construction. • If unanticipated cultural material is encountered during any phase of project construction, all construction work within 50 feet (15 meters) of the find shall cease and the qualified archaeologist shall assess the find for importance. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If, in consultation with the City, the discovery is determined not to be important, work will be permitted to continue in the area. • If the qualified archaeologist determines a resource to constitute a “historical resource” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a “unique archaeological resource” pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the qualified archaeologist shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer and the City to develop a formal treatment plan. The plan should serve to reduce impacts to the resources and allow construction to proceed. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) -10- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. • If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. • The Property Owner/Developer shall provide any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin for curation at a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the South-Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, the Property Owner/Developer shall donate the archaeological material to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes, as determined to be appropriate by the City of Anaheim. VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS MM GEO-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. Planning and Building Department/Building Division -11- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION XII. NOISE MM NOI-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall perform one of the following actions to reduce the construction- related noise impacts to Loara Elementary School, located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site: • Restrict all demolition and grading equipment from operating within 50 feet of the shared south property line with Loara Elementary School, while Loara Elementary School is in session; • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct a temporary 8-foot high wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School. The temporary wall shall be constructed with minimum 5/8-inch plywood or oriented strand board (OSB) and shall be maintained until completion of the grading phase; or • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct the proposed 8-foot high CMU wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School that is detailed in Project Design Feature 1. Planning and Building Department/Building Division XVII. TRAFFIC MM TRAF-1 Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the westbound left-turn storage length an additional 45 feet east of the railroad crossing to provide 105 feet of total storage; • Add striping to designate the additional storage length for the westbound left-turn lane; • Relocate the railroad crossing arm onto the remaining median strip. Public Works Department/Traffic and Transportation Division -12- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. MM TRAF-2 Prior to issuance of the first building permit Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the northbound left-turn storage lane by restriping an additional 85 feet of lane to the south to provide 200 feet total storage; • Restrict on-street parking along the eastern and western sides of Loara Street from Lincoln Avenue to the southern boundary of the Project Site by adding additional red curb striping and/or “no parking” signs; • Restripe Loara Street with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) from the end of the extended 200 foot northbound left turn lane to at least 100 feet south of its intersection with Embassy Street (the existing “KEEP CLEAR” pavement markings at Loara Street/Embassy Street intersection shall remain). Transitional striping shall be provided from the end of the TWLTL to the existing center lane striping beyond the southern boundary of the Project Site, and the exact lengths of striping will be determined through the street Improvement Plans; • Extend the eastbound right turn lane striping (current striping is approximately 90 feet in length) an additional 155 feet west of the driveway to provide 245 feet total storage (based on General Plan Amendment queuing). • Retain and extend existing red curb striping or “no parking” signs along the southern side of Lincoln Avenue for the 245-foot approach to the intersection. Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Public Works Department/Traffic and Transportation Division -13- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION Certificate of Occupancy. XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES MM TCR-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the Project area. This list is provided by the NAHC. The Tribal monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The onsite monitoring shall end when the Project Site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the Project Site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Planning and Building Department/Building Division MM TCR-2 Upon discovery of any archaeological resources. Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, construction activities shall be ceased in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Planning and Building Department/Building Division -14- MITIGATION NUMBER TIMING MEASURE RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING COMPLETION Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 - 1 - PC2020-*** ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2018-00316) (DEV2017-00128) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive a verified petition to rezone or reclassify that certain real property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street and commonly referred to as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") to apply “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay Zone to the existing "C-G" General Commercial base zone, which reclassification is designated as Reclassification No. 2018-00316; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 5.25 acres in size, and is currently developed with an automobile dealership and automobile and recreational repair and storage facilities. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2018-00316 is proposed in conjunction with a request for (i) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 to re-designate the Property from the “General Commerial” to the “Mixed-Use High” land use designation; (ii) approval of a Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 to permit a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure, with modified development standards; and (iii) approval of a Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 to provide the Developer a vested right to develop the Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on March 26, 2020, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. On March 16, 2020, the Anaheim - 2 - City Council approved a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local emergency regarding Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and in conjunction with this action closed the City Hall and the Public Libraries to public access. Therefore the IS/MND was not available in these locations, but was made available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 366"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on April 27, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by its motion, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP No. 366, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 366; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to Proposed Project, the Planning Commission, by motion, recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Reclassification No. 2018-00316, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to the adoption by the City Council of (1) a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979; (2) a resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2018- 00523; and, (3) an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2019-00001; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ___ day of _____, 2020, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and - 3 - WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find and determine as follows: 1. Reclassification of the Property to apply “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone to the existing "C-G" General Commercial zone is consistent with the Property’s proposed Mixed- Use High land use designation in the General Plan, now pending. 2. The proposed reclassification of the Property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community and is compatible with the neighboring properties, which are developed with a mix of commercial, light industrial, and multi-family residential uses. 3. The proposed reclassification of the Property does properly relate to the zone and its permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the Property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community in that surrounding properties include commercial uses in “C-G” General Commercial Zone, light industrial uses (i.e. offices, warehouses) in “I” Industrial Zone, and multi-family residential uses in “RM-4” Multiple Family Residential Zone. WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Ordinance, that the facts stated in this Ordinance are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Ordinance. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended by rezoning and reclassifying the subject Property, as described above, to apply “MU” Mixed-Use Overaly Zone over the existing “C-G” General Commercial Zone of the City of Anaheim. SECTION 2. The City Zoning Map shall be, and the same is hereby, amended and the above-described Property shall be excluded from the zone in which it is now situated and incorporated in and made a part of the zone or zones as above set forth, and said City Zoning Map, as amended, is hereby adopted and the Planning Department is hereby directed to prepare a sectional zoning map to be added to the City Zoning Map showing the changes hereby approved and adopted. - 4 - SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim, and thirty (30) days from and after its final passage, it shall take effect and be in full force. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2020, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN : CITY OF ANAHEIM _________________________________ MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: _____________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - ATTACHMENT NO. 5 - 1 - PC2020-*** RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979 (DEV2017-00128) (1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council ") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 to permit the construction of a mixed- use development consisting of 315 residential units (apartment) with 2,031 square-foot leasing office, 3,413 square-foot retail space and a parking structure, with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in the interior setback requirements of the "MU" Mixed-Use Overlay Zone, on that certain real property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street and commonly referred to as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 is proposed in conjunction with (i) approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523 to re-designate the Property from the “General Commercial” to the “Mixed-Use High” land use designation; (ii) Reclassification No. 2018-00316 to reclassify the property to appl y “MU” Mixed-Use Overlay zone over the existing “C-G” General Commercial zone, and (iii) approval of a Development Agreement No. 2019-00001 to provide the Developer a vested right to develop the Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2018- 00523, Reclassification No. 2018-00316, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, Development Agreement No. 2019-00001, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, a mixed-use development within the "MU" Mixed-Use Zone is subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection .120 of Section 18.32.030 (Uses). Pursuant to Subsection .020 of Section 18.32.070 (Building Setbacks), the minimum setbacks set forth in Section 18.32.070 (Building Setbacks) of Chapter 18.32 (Mixed-Use Overlay Zone) may be modified in order to achieve a high quality project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If approved, Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979 will permit the reduction in interior structural and landscape setback requirement of the "MU" Mixed-Use Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 5.25 acres in size, and is currently developed with an automobile dealership and automobile and recreational repair and storage facilities. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan; and - 2 - WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on March 26, 2020, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. On March 16, 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local emergency regarding Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19), and in conjunction with this action closed the City Hall and the Public Libraries to public access. Therefore the IS/MND was not available in these locations, but was made available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 366"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on April 27, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by its motion, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP No. 366, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 366; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to Proposed Project, the Planning Commission, by motion, recommended that the City - 3 - Council approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to the adoption by the City Council of (1) an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2019-00001; (2) an ordinance approving and adopting Reclassification No. 2018-00316; and, (3) resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ___ day of _____, 2020, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .020 (Modifications) of Section 18.32.070 (Building Setbacks), this City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979: 1. The uses within the Project are compatible with the surrounding land uses; 2. New buildings or structures related to the Project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area. The proposed project consists of a mixed-used development at a density and scale that is compatible with the surrounding commercial, light industrial, and multiple-family land uses in the vicinity; 3. Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate because improvements to Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street and the project’s ingress/egress will be constructed in accordance with City standards, along with installation of a new sidewalk and parkways adjacent to the streets; 4. The Project is consistent with any adopted design guidelines applicable to the Property because the project has been designed to include quality architecture, sound attenuation, common recreational areas, and sufficient building setbacks and landscape screening; 5. The size and shape of the site proposed for the Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area because the Project has been designed to include Code compliant parking and recreational areas, sufficient building and landscape setbacks from the adjacent properties, and new pedestrian paths throughout the neighborhood; 6. The traffic generated by the Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area as the Traffic Study conducted for the Propose Project determined that there are no significant impacts to the surrounding roadways with incorporation of the mitigation measures; 7. The Project will comply with the General Plan and zoning for the Property because the Project will provide for the development of a quality multiple-family living environment with compatible commercial uses, along with various design amenities, such as private open space or - 4 - common recreation areas. The permitted residential density range under the Mixed-Use High designation is from zero to 60 dwelling units per acre and maximum 0.35 floor area ratio (FAR) for non-residential uses. The proposed project will have a residential density of 60 dwelling units per acre and 0.01 non-residential FAR; 8. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. and; WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the City Council does hereby approve and adopt Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05979, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption by the City Council of (i) a resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2018-00523, (ii) an ordinance approving and adopting Reclassification No. 2018-00316 and (iii) an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 22019-00001, all of which entitlements are now pending; (2) the mitigation measures set forth in MMP 366, and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 5 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ____ day of ______________, 2020, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR OF THE CITY OFANAHEIM ATTEST: ______________________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - - 7 - EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05979 (DEV2017-00128) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim a 60-ft easement from the construction centerline on Lincoln Ave and a corner cutback, for road, public utilities and other public purposes. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 The applicant shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Lot Line Adjustment document. The document shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with conforming deed, in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The legal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division for APN: 350-091-11. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 The developer shall submit improvement plans, for the construction of required public improvements, to the Public Works Development Services Division for review, approval, and to determine the bond amounts. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. All onsite utilities shall be privately owned and maintained by the Owner, the grading plans shall be labeled accordingly. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 Prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on- site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 8 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 The owner shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 The owner shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 9 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 10 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in State of California. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 11 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering 12 MM AIR-2 The property owner/developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans and require that off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. Planning and Building Department, Building Division 13 MM CUL-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall provide a note on plans indicating that in the event that any evidence of cultural resources is discovered during ground-disturbing activities, all work within the vicinity of the find shall stop until a qualified archaeological consultant can assess the find and make recommendations. Project Applicant shall not attempt excavation of potential cultural resources. The qualified archaeologist shall ensure that the Proposed Project complies with the following measures. • Prior to any ground disturbance, the qualified archaeologist, or their designee, shall provide a worker environmental awareness protection (WEAP) training to construction personnel regarding Planning and Building Department, Building and Planning Services Divisions - 9 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT regulatory requirements for the protection of cultural (prehistoric and historic) resources. As part of this training, construction personnel shall receive proper procedures to follow if unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during construction. Workers will have contact information and protocols to follow in the event of any inadvertent discoveries. The WEAP training can be in the form of a video or PowerPoint presentation. Printed literature (handouts) can accompany the training and given to new workers and contractors to avoid continuous training over the course of the construction. • If unanticipated cultural material is encountered during any phase of project construction, all construction work within 50 feet (15 meters) of the find shall cease and the qualified archaeologist shall assess the find for importance. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If, in consultation with the City, the discovery is determined not to be important, work will be permitted to continue in the area. • If the qualified archaeologist determines a resource to constitute a “historical resource” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a “unique archaeological resource” pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the qualified archaeologist shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer and the City to develop a formal treatment plan. The plan should serve to reduce impacts to the resources and allow construction to proceed. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. • If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. • The Property Owner/Developer shall provide any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin for curation at a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the South-Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, the Property Owner/Developer shall donate the archaeological material to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes, as determined to be appropriate by the City of Anaheim. - 10 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 14 MM GEO-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. Planning and Building Department, Building and Planning Services Divisions 15 MM NOI-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall perform one of the following actions to reduce the construction-related noise impacts to Loara Elementary School, located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site: • Restrict all demolition and grading equipment from operating within 50 feet of the shared south property line with Loara Elementary School, while Loara Elementary School is in session; • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct a temporary 8-foot high wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School. The temporary wall shall be constructed with minimum 5/8-inch plywood or oriented strand board (OSB) and shall be maintained until completion of the grading phase; or • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct the proposed 8-foot high CMU wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School that is detailed in Project Design Feature 1. Planning and Building Department, Building and Planning Services Divisions 16 MM TCR-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the Project area. This list is provided by the NAHC. The Tribal monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground- disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 11 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The onsite monitoring shall end when the Project Site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the Project Site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS 17 A Certificate of Compliance pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Code for APN 350-091-11 shall be approved by the City and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 18 A Lot Line Adjustment shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with conforming deeds, in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 19 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 20 The developer shall obtain a right of way construction permit to construct all improvements along the project’s frontage on Lincoln Ave and Loara Street. The improvements shall include but not limited to curb widening on Lincoln Ave, construction of a new bus pad, traffic signal modifications, curb and gutter, pavement, pavement transitions, driveway, parkway, sidewalk, ADA ramps, parkway drains, water meter removals, sewer laterals, etc. All improvements identified in MM TRAF-1 and MM TRAF-2 shall be included. Additional grind and overlay may be required to achieve the required street cross slope. Limits of the grind and overlay will be determined by the City Engineer during the final design phase. All improvements shall be installed completely prior to the first final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 21 The developer’s engineer shall submit to the City for review and approval an engineering cost estimate for the cost of the required improvements on Lincoln Ave and Loara Street. The Developer shall post a security (Performance and Labor & Materials Bonds) in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney for the construction of all required off-site and public improvements within Lincoln Ave and Loara Street. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 12 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 22 Building permit plans shall demonstrate the following: • At-grade ducts and overhead pipes do encroach in the parking space areas or required vehicle clearance areas. • Curbs at driveways are painted red to preserve line of sight. • Curbs along fire access lanes are designated as fire lanes. • Stop sign, stop bar, and stop legend shown at the intersection of Loara Street and the minor street approach, per City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Details 434 and 435. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 23 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 24 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537- 537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 25 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 26 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 27 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 28 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 13 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. 29 The Owner/Developer shall submit a water system master plan, including a hydraulic distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval. The master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed on-site water system to meet the project’s water demands and fire protection requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 30 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 31 Water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 32 The property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 33 All electrically operated gates (both pedestrian and vehicle gates) shall include installation of an electronic access system which allows for the use of a public safety radio frequency to open the gate Police Department 34 All above-ground utility devices including, but no limited to, electrical transformers, water backflow devices, gas, communications and cable devices, air condition facilities, and etc., shall be located outside all required street setbacks and screened. Location of such devices shall be shown on plans submitted for building permits. Plans shall also identify the specific screening treatment of each device (i.e. landscape screening, color of walls, materials, identifiers, access points, etc.) and shall be subject to the review and approval of all appropriate City departments. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 35 Final landscaping plans in compliance with all Code requirements shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department. The said Planning and Building Department, - 14 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT landscaping plan must be in conformance with the City’s Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance (Chapter 10.19) and the Zoning Code. Landscaping shall be installed prior to the final zoning inspection or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Planning Services Division 36 All signs shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 37 MM AIR-1 the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the building plans and require that the painting contractor for the interior areas of the residential portion of Proposed Project shall utilize “Super- Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 and contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. A list of “Super-Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural-coatings/super-compliant- coatings Planning and Building Department, Building Division 38 The plans submitted for the building plan check shall show all improvements listed as Project Design Features #1, 2, 3, and 4 of the IS/MND prepared for the project, which are as follows: • 8-foot high CMU wall along the portion of the south property line that is shared with the school to the south and along the portion of the west property line that is shared with the existing commercial use; Preservation of the existing 6-foot high CMU wall along the remaining portion of the west property line; • Mechanical ventilation per Chapter 12, Section 1205 of the Uniform Building Code for each proposed residential unit (i.e. a standard forced air conditioning and heating system with a filtered outside air intake vent for each residential unit) • 8-foot high sound wall along the east side (next to Loara Street) of the Northeast Courtyard and a 6-foot high sound wall along the east side (next to Loara Street) of the East Courtyard. The sound walls shall be constructed of either CMU, stucco or glass or a combination of these materials. • Installation of the windows and doors with minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 29 STC for all residential units that are located on the eastern portion of the north side of the proposed building. All other windows and exterior doors installed on the rest of the residential units shall be standard dual paned windows and exterior doors that have a minimum 26 STC rating. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES - 15 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 39 MM TCR-2 Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, construction activities shall be ceased in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 40 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 41 All required WQMP improvements shall be operational and verified by the Construction Services Division Inspector. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 42 MM TRAF-1 The Property Owner/Developer shall complete construction of the following improvements: Public Works Department, - 16 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT • Extend the westbound left-turn storage length an additional 45 feet east of the railroad crossing to provide 105 feet of total storage; • Add striping to designate the additional storage length for the westbound left-turn lane; • Relocate the railroad crossing arm onto the remaining median strip. These improvements shall be included on the street improvement plans prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Development Services and Traffic Engineering Divisions 43 MM TRAF-2 The Property Owner/Developer shall complete construction of the following improvements: • Extend the northbound left-turn storage lane by restriping an additional 85 feet of lane to the south to provide 200 feet total storage; • Restrict on-street parking along the eastern and western sides of Loara Street from Lincoln Avenue to the southern boundary of the Project Site by adding additional red curb striping and/or “no parking” signs; • Restripe Loara Street with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) from the end of the extended 200 foot northbound left turn lane to at least 100 feet south of its intersection with Embassy Street (the existing “KEEP CLEAR” pavement markings at Loara Street/Embassy Street intersection shall remain). Transitional striping shall be provided from the end of the TWLTL to the existing center lane striping beyond the southern boundary of the Project Site, and the exact lengths of striping will be determined through the street Improvement Plans; • Extend the eastbound right turn lane striping (current striping is approximately 90 feet in length) an additional 155 feet west of the driveway to provide 245 feet total storage (based on General Plan Amendment queuing). • Retain and extend existing red curb striping or “no parking” signs along the southern side of Lincoln Avenue for the 245-foot approach to the intersection. These improvements shall be included on the street improvement plans prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Public Works Department, Development Services and Traffic Engineering Divisions 44 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 45 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division - 17 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 46 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 47 File Emergency Listing Card, Form APD-281, with the Police Department Police Department 48 A complex map shall be provided in electronic form to the Anaheim Police Department. Police Department 49 Post “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” at the entrances of parking areas and other appropriate places (i.e. resident gathering points and access points, bicycle parking, etc.). Such signs must be at least 1’ wide and 2’ high in overall size, with white background and black 2” lettering. Police Department 50 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owner’s/homeowners association’s request Police Department ON-GOING DURING OPERATIONS 51 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 52 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division GENERAL 53 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 18 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 54 A minimum of two connections to public water mains (one on Loara Street and one on Lincoln Avenue) and water looping inside the project are required. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 55 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 56 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 57 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 58 The property owner shall comply with all terms of the Development Agreement No. 2019-00001. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 59 Internal modifications that result in creation of an additional bedroom, as defined by the Zoning Code, is prohibited for all apartment units. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 60 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 61 Trees shall be maintained in perpetuity and in good health along the northerly property line to provide adequate screening and privacy from adjacent property, in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 62 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 19 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 63 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 64 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DEV2017-00128 Prepared for: The City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Contact: Andy Uk, Associate Planner Applicant: KNT I Enterprises, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Prepared By: 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 783-1863 Contact: Lindsay Ortega, AICP, Senior Project Manager March 2020 Revised April 2020 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 This page is intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance ............................................................. 2 1.2 Content and Format of a Mitigated Negative Declaration ................................................. 2 1.3 Public Review Process ......................................................................................................... 3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 4 2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Existing Project Site Conditions Setting .............................................................................. 4 2.3 Project Description ............................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Construction Schedule ...................................................................................................... 41 2.5 Discretionary Actions ........................................................................................................ 41 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ........................................................................... 42 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: .................................................................... 46 3.2 Determination: .................................................................................................................. 46 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS .......................................................... 47 4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................... 48 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................. 51 4.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 53 4.4 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 72 4.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 75 4.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................... 79 4.7 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 85 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................................... 91 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 94 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ......................................................................................... 102 4.11 Land Use and Planning .................................................................................................... 108 4.12 Mineral Resources .......................................................................................................... 111 4.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................... 112 4.14 Population and Housing .................................................................................................. 122 4.15 Public Services ................................................................................................................. 124 4.16 Recreation ....................................................................................................................... 129 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ii 4.17 Transportation ................................................................................................................ 131 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 167 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems .......................................................................................... 172 4.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................... 177 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................................ 180 5 LIST OF PREPARERS .................................................................................. 182 6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 183 FIGURES Figure 1 - Regional Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2 - Project Vicinity Map ........................................................................................................ 8 Figure 3 - Conceptual Site Plan ..................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4 – Conceptual Floor Plans (1) ........................................................................................... 16 Figure 5 – Conceptual Floor Plans (2) ........................................................................................... 17 Figure 6 – Conceptual Floor Plans (3) ........................................................................................... 18 Figure 7 – Conceptual Floor Plans (4) ........................................................................................... 19 Figure 8 – Conceptual Floor Plans (5) ........................................................................................... 20 Figure 9 – Conceptual Elevations .................................................................................................. 21 Figure 10 – Conceptual Building Plans (1) .................................................................................... 22 Figure 11 – Conceptual Building Plans (2) .................................................................................... 23 Figure 12 – Conceptual Building Plans (3) .................................................................................... 24 Figure 13 – Conceptual Building Plans (4) .................................................................................... 25 Figure 14 – Overall Conceptual Landscape Plan ........................................................................... 26 Figure 15 – Conceptual Open Space Plan ..................................................................................... 27 Figure 16 - Conceptual Recreation Areas ..................................................................................... 28 Figure 17 – Conceptual Tree and Ground Cover Plan .................................................................. 29 Figure 18 - Conceptual Shrub Plan ................................................................................................ 30 Figure 19 - Conceptual Irrigation Plan .......................................................................................... 31 Figure 20 – Conceptual Courtyard Landscape Plan ...................................................................... 32 Figure 21 – Conceptual Grading Plan ............................................................................................ 33 Figure 22 - Conceptual Utilities Plan ............................................................................................. 34 Figure 23 – Conceptual Fire Access Plan ....................................................................................... 35 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration iii Figure 24 – Conceptual Waste Management Plan ....................................................................... 36 Figure 25 – Conceptual Color and Material Board ....................................................................... 37 Figure 26 – Conceptual Project Renderings .................................................................................. 38 Figure 27 – Conceptual Building Sections ..................................................................................... 39 TABLES Table 1 – Project Site Information .................................................................................................. 4 Table 2 – SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance .................. 54 Table 3 – SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance .................................................. 54 Table 4 – Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation ......... 58 Table 5 – Mitigated Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ....................... 59 Table 6 – Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions .............................................. 60 Table 7 – Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ....................................................... 61 Table 8 – Project’s Contribution to Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin ................... 62 Table 9 – Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions................................................. 63 Table 10 – Cancer Risk Calculation Parameters ............................................................................ 65 Table 11 – Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation ....................................................................................................................................................... 66 Table 12 – Mitigated Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors ........... 67 Table 13 – Proposed Project Compliance with the General Plan Energy Conservation Policies . 84 Table 14 – Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions ................................................... 92 Table 15 – Construction Noise Levels at the Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation .. 115 Table 16 – Mitigated Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Sensitive Receptors ....................... 116 Table 17 – Existing Year Project Traffic Noise Contributions ..................................................... 117 Table 18 – Opening Year 2023 Project Traffic Noise Contributions ........................................... 118 Table 19 – Project Operational Noise Levels at the Adjacent Residential and School Properties ..................................................................................................................................................... 119 Table 20 - Population and Housing Growth Projections for the City of Anaheim ...................... 123 Table 21 – Project Trip Generation Summary ............................................................................ 132 Table 22 – Traffic Impact Analysis Study Segments and Intersections ...................................... 135 Table 23 – Existing Roadway Segment ADT LOS ......................................................................... 137 Table 24 – Existing Roadway Segment Peak Hour LOS ............................................................... 138 Table 25 – Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS ......................................................... 139 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration iv Table 26 – Existing Queuing Analysis .......................................................................................... 140 Table 27 – Existing plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS ..................................... 143 Table 28 - Existing plus Project Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service .................................. 147 Table 29 - Existing plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service ........................ 148 Table 30 – Existing plus Project Queuing Analysis ...................................................................... 149 Table 31 - Opening Year plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS ............................ 151 Table 32 - Opening Year plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service ............... 152 Table 33 - Opening Year plus Project Queuing Analysis ............................................................. 154 Table 34 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service .. 157 Table 35 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service ......................................................................................................................................... 158 Table 36 - General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Queuing Analysis ...................................... 160 Table 37 – Project Access Intersection Queuing Analysis .......................................................... 161 APPENDICES Appendix A – Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Assessment Impact Analysis Appendix B – Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix C – Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Appendix D – Geotechnical Evaluation Appendix E – Infiltration Study Appendix F – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix G – Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Appendix H – Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Appendix I – Preliminary Hydrology Report Appendix J – Noise Impact Analysis Appendix K – Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix L – AB52/SB18 Consultation Appendix M – Sewer Study 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration v ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS Acronyms/Abbreviation Definition ADT average daily traffic AFD Anaheim Fire Department afy acre feet per year AMC Anaheim Municipal Code APD Anaheim Police Department Applicant KNT I Enterprises, LLC APN Assessor’s Parcel Number APUD Anaheim Public Utilities Department AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ASTs above ground storage tanks BMPs Best Management Practices CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act cfs cubic feet per second CGS California Geologic Survey CHSC California Health and Safety Code City City of Anaheim CMP Congestion Management Program CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Value CO carbon monoxide County Orange County CRPR California Rare Plant Rank CWA Clean Water Act dB Decibel dBA A-weighted decibels EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Environmental Site Assessment FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program GHG greenhouse gas GPA General Plan Amendment gpd gallons per day HCM Highway Capacity Manual 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration vi Acronyms/Abbreviation Definition ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization IS Initial Study Leq Equivalent sound level LBP lead-based paint LOS level of service LSTs Localized Significant Thresholds MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act mgd million gallons per day MLD most likely descendent MND Mitigated Negative Declaration MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MSL mean sea level MTCO2e million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MWD Metropolitan Water District NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCCP Natural Communities Conservation Plan NO2 nitrogen dioxide NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System OCSD Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OUSD Orange Unified School District PM2.5 fine particulate matter PM10 Respirable particulate matter ppm parts per million PPV peak particle velocity RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SLF Sacred Lands File SO2 sulfur dioxide SR-55 State Route 55 SR-91 State Route 91 SWCRB State Water Resources Control Board SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TAC toxic air contaminant 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration vii Acronyms/Abbreviation Definition TMDLs total maximum daily loads TWC Time Warner Cable USTs underground storage tanks UWMP Urban Water Management Plan V/C volume-to-capacity VOC volatile organic compound WoUS Waters of the United States 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 | Page 1 INTRODUCTION KNT I Enterprises, LLC (Applicant) proposes to demolish existing auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility, and construct a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential apartment (rental) unit complex with a 2,031 sq. ft. leasing office and 3,413 sq. ft. of retail space (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project is located on 5.25-acres of land consisting of three parcels, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 250-091-09, 250-091-10 and 250-091-11 located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue (Project Site). The Applicant is requesting the following entitlements: • A General Plan Amendment (GPA2018-00523) to re-designate the Project Site from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High; • A zoning reclassification (RCL2018-00316) to apply Mixed-Use Overlay over the existing General Commercial base zone; • A Conditional Use Permit (CUP2018-05979) to allow a mixed-use project and reduced interior structural and landscape setbacks adjacent to residential use; and • A Development Agreement (DAG2019-00001) for the proposed voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs (i.e. Senior Safety Net Program). The Proposed Project would implement the City’s Mixed-Use overlay standards with a residential density of 60 dwelling units/acre. The Proposed Project will feature approximately 43,196 square feet of community amenities that include open space, lushly landscaped courtyards, a pool and spa area, a fitness center, a dog spa and a dog park. The residential units will range from studio to two-bedroom units and would range in size from 592 to 1,104 square feet and includes either patios or balconies ranging in size from 70 to 100 square feet. Parking for the Proposed Project’s residential units would include 620 spaces, resulting in a parking rate of 1.9 spaces/unit. Additionally, a total of 19 parking spaces would be provided for the retail and office space, for a total of 639 spaces provided on-site for the Proposed Project. A total of 636 spaces would be in the proposed central parking garage, and three (3) would be provided at surface level accessible from Loara Street. The Proposed Project is a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resource Code § 21000 et seq.: “CEQA”). The primary purpose of CEQA is to inform the public and decision makers as to the potential impacts of a project and to allow an opportunity for public input to ensure informed decision-making. CEQA requires all state and local government agencies to consider the environmental effects of projects over which they have discretionary authority. CEQA also requires each public agency to mitigate or avoid any significant environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of projects subject to CEQA. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim (the City) is the lead agency for the Proposed Project. The lead agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. The City, as the lead agency for the Proposed Project, is responsible for preparing environmental documentation in accordance with 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 | Page CEQA to determine if approval of the discretionary actions requested and subsequent development of the Proposed Project would have a significant impact on the environment. 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act Compliance A Lead Agency may prepare Mitigated Negative Declaration for a project that is subject to CEQA when an Initial Study has identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21064.5). This IS/MND has been prepared for the Proposed Project, in conformance with Section 15070(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The purpose of the IS/MND is to identify any potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project and incorporate mitigation measures into the Proposed Project as necessary to eliminate the potentially significant effects of the Proposed Project or to reduce the effects to a level of less than significant. 1.2 Content and Format of a Mitigated Negative Declaration The IS/MND is an informational document intended to disclose to agencies and to the public the environmental consequences of approving and implementing the Proposed Project. This IS/MND includes the following: Section 1: Introduction: This section introduces the Proposed Project, including project background, CEQA compliance, and public review process. Section 2: Project Description: This section provides a detailed description of the Proposed Project, including the Proposed Project location, geographic and environmental setting, project characteristics, and discretionary actions related to the Proposed Project. Section 3: Initial Study Checklist: This section provides the findings that the Proposed Project would not have a significant effect on the environment and the support for this finding. Section 4: Environmental Impact Analysis: This section provides an analysis of the Proposed Project against the standards outlined in the environmental issue categories in the Initial Study checklist. The Initial Study analyzes environmental issues and concerns surrounding the Proposed Project, determines the level of significance of the Proposed Project’s environmental effects, and identifies corresponding mitigation measures to lessen potentially significant impacts to a less than significant level. Section 5: List of Preparers: This section provides a list of professionals who contributed to the preparation of the IS/MND. Section 6: References: This section provides a list of references used to prepare the IS/MND. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 | Page 1.3 Public Review Process Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15105(b), the IS/MND will be available for a 20-day public review and comment period from March 26, 2020 to April 15, 2020 on the City of Anaheim’s website (www.anaheim.net, go to the Planning & Building Department and click on the link to Current Environmental Documents). If a paper copy of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is needed, please contact Andy Uk at the email address or phone number listed below.1: In reviewing the IS/MND, affected public agencies and the interested members of the public should focus on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts on the environment, as well as ways in which the significant effects of the Proposed Project would be avoided or mitigated. Comments may be made on the IS/MND in writing before the end of the comment period. Following the close of the public comment period, the City will consider this IS/MND and comments thereto in determining whether to approve the Proposed Project. Written comments on the IS/MND should be sent to the following address by April 15, 2020: City of Anaheim Attn: Andy Uk, Associate Planner 200 S Anaheim Blvd., Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 714-765-5238 auk@anaheim.net 1On March 16, 2020, the Anaheim City Council approved a resolution proclaiming the existence of a local emergency regarding Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). In conjunction, with this action and other related actions the City closed City Hall and the Public Libraries to public access. Therefore the IS/MND is not available in these locations. If a paper copy of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration is needed, please contact Andy Uk at the email address or phone number listed above. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 4 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location The Proposed Project is located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (APNs 250-091-09, 250-09110 and 250-091-11) in the City of Anaheim (City), in the northern portion of Orange County, California (Project Site). The Project Site is within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) “Anaheim, California” 7.5-minute quadrangle (2015) and located in the northwestern portion of the City on the south of Lincoln Avenue, west of South Loara Street, north of West Broadway, and east of Euclid Street. Freeway access to the Project Site is provided via Interstate 5 (I-5) (Figure 1 - Regional Vicinity Map). 2.2 Existing Project Site Conditions Setting The Project Site is 5.25-acres consisting of three parcels, located south of Lincoln Avenue, west of South Loara Street, north of West Broadway, and east of Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim (Figure 2 – Project Vicinity Map). The Project Site contains auto related facilities that includes an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. Topography on the Project Site is generally flat at approximately 129 to 135 feet above mean sea level. Existing site drainage occurs in three directions and discharges from the property at West Lincoln Avenue, South Loara Street, and West Pampas Lane. Vehicular access to the Project Site is currently provided via three driveway access points on South Loara Street and one on West Lincoln Street. Table 1 - Project Site Information summarizes key information related to the Project Site. Table 1 – Project Site Information Address 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Assessor’s Parcel Number 250-091-09, 250-091-10, and 250-091-11 Size 5.25 acres Existing General Plan Designation General Commercial Existing Zoning General Commercial Existing Use Auto dealership with Auto/Recreational Vehicle Storage, Sales Lot, and Repair Facility Surrounding Uses and Zoning North General Plan Designation: General Commercial Zoning: General Commercial and Industrial Uses: Manufacturing and Auto Service Facilities South: General Plan Designation: Industrial, Medium Density Residential, and Public Zoning: Multiple Family Residential (RM-4), Industrial and Transition Uses: Offices, Multiple-Family Residential Apartments, Elementary School East General Plan Designation: General Commercial and Industrial Zoning: Industrial Uses: Brewery, Commercial Wholesale, and Auto Service Facilities West General Plan Designation: General Commercial and Medium Density Residential, Zoning: General Commercial and Multiple-Family Residential (RM-4) Uses: Auto Service Facility, commercial uses, Multiple-Family Residential Apartments 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 5 General Plan Amendment The Project Site is currently designated as General Commercial in the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan and would require a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to re-designate the Project Site to Mixed-Use High. The existing land use designation of General Commercial includes a variety of land uses, which may, but do not necessarily, serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods. Typical uses include large grocery stores, appliance stores, neighborhood-serving restaurants, banks, specialty shops, low intensity civic uses, and bakeries. Addition uses served by the General Commercial land use designation include highway-serving uses such as fast-food restaurants, auto-oriented uses such as tire stores, service stations, auto parts stores, and other stand-alone retail uses. Generally, Mixed-Use land use designations are designed to function differently from the typical patterns of individual, segregated land uses. Uses and activities are designed together in an integrated fashion to create a dynamic urban environment that serves as the center of activity for the surrounding area. The designation provides opportunities for an integrated mix of residential, retail, service, entertainment and office opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment. Continuous commercial street frontage on the first and, perhaps, second floors, supported by residential and/or office uses above, is the typical pattern of vertically mixed land use. Typical uses include a mix of commercial, office, and residential. The proposed land use designation of Mixed-Use High is intended to allow a mix of uses including residential, commercial, services, hotel, and professional office uses in a high-quality environment. Zoning Reclassification The Project Site is currently zoned General Commercial, which is intended for general commercial uses including retail sales, professional offices, personal services, research and development, retail, and business and financial services. The Proposed Project would require a zoning reclassification of the Project Site to apply the Mixed-Use Overlay to the existing General Commercial (C-G) base zoning designation. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 6 This page is intentionally left blank 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 1: Regional Location Map Source: Google Maps Project Site 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 2: Project Vicinity Map Source: Google Maps Project Site 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 9 Surrounding Land Uses The Project Site is located within an area with mixed zoning, including a predominant amount of General Commercial, Industrial, Multiple-Family Residential and Single-Family Residential zoned lots. The surrounding area includes industrial and commercial uses to the north, across West Lincoln Avenue, and to the east, commercial and multiple family residential uses, and an elementary school to the south, and commercial and multiple family residential uses to the west. Beyond the adjacent uses to the Project Site are commercial, single-family and multiple-family residential uses located to the west, south, and southwest, and commercial and industrial uses to the east, southeast, north, and northwest. 2.3 Project Description The Proposed Project includes the demolition of existing auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility, and construction of a 381,525 square foot (SF) mixed use building containing 315 residential apartments (rental) with 2,031 SF leasing office and amenities, 639 on-site parking spaces (636 spaces in a 239,072 SF parking garage and three surface spaces), and 3,413 SF of retail space. The proposed building would be 72-feet 6-inches at its highest point, which is located at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The proposed parking structure would be 47-feet to top of parapet and 54-feet 4-inches to top of elevator overrun. The Proposed Project utilizes the Mixed-Use Overlay zone standards at a density of 60 units/acre and features a four-story mixed-use building comprised of residential and commercial uses. The Proposed Project includes community amenity spaces, encompassing 43,196 square feet, which includes open space, lushly landscaped courtyards, a pool and spa area, and a dog park, along with interior amenities such as a club and game room, dog park, pool, fitness area, dog spa, and lounges and community areas for residents. The Proposed Project also includes a six-level parking garage, 6- to 8-foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls along the western and southern property lines, fencing, sidewalks, landscaping and internal service roads separating the existing adjacent uses to the south and portion to the west. The residential component includes studios, one- and two-bedroom units, which ranges in size from 592 to 1,104 SF. All units would have access to the internal parking garage. The proposed parking garage houses 636 of the Proposed Project’s 639 on-site parking spaces in six levels, including one subterranean level. The remaining three parking spaces would be located on-grade off Loara Street near the proposed leasing office. The Proposed Project provides 620 residential parking spaces, which is nine (9) spaces in excess of the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) required 1.25 spaces per studio, 2 spaces per one-bedroom, and 2.25 spaces per two-bedroom, and 19 non-residential parking spaces. Of the proposed parking, 19 spaces would have electric vehicle charging spaces and four (4) spaces would be designated as “clean air vehicles only” spaces. Solar ready rooftops would be included as a part of the Proposed Project’s energy efficiency features in addition to the electric vehicle charging and clean air vehicle parking spaces. Design materials for the Proposed Project include white and grey plaster façade with stone veneer and fiber cement board architectural detailing. Balconies for the residential units would consist of metal railing with engraved metal paneling. Metal awnings would be provided above 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 10 the exterior façade’s white vinyl windows. The proposed building would have foam corbels and red tile roofing. The commercial portion of the proposed building façade would include aluminum store fronts with large glass windows and doors. The required development standards for the Proposed Project would be subject to the Mixed- Use Overlay zoning designation of AMC Chapter 18.32 – Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone. Structural Setbacks Pursuant to Section 18.32.070 of the AMC, the landscape and building setbacks of the underlying zone (C-G) apply to the Proposed Project. Such setback requirements can be modified through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process (AMC Chapter 18.66). Per the underlying General Commercial zoning designation, Chapter 18.08 – Commercial Zones, a 15-foot setback is required for all property lines abutting an arterial street, while a 10-foot setback is required for all property lines abutting a local street. For property lines abutting any nonresidential zone, no setback is required. For property lines abutting any residential zones, any proposed structures would be subject to a setback based on the proposed building stories. Per Table 8-G of Chapter 18.08, the proposed four-story building would be required to maintain a 101-foot setback. As part of the required CUP process to permit a mixed-use development, the Proposed Project includes a request for a modified setback to allow a minimum of 10-foot structural setback along the interior property lines abutting the existing multi-family residential development, instead of the required 101 feet. The Proposed Project would comply with the remaining setback requirements. Landscape Setbacks and Open Space Per Section 18.08.060, Table 8-G of the AMC, a 10-foot landscape setback is required for all property lines abutting residential zones or local streets, and a 15-foot landscape setback is required for all property lines abutting arterial streets. Such setback areas must be maintained with lawns, trees, shrubs or other plants. No landscape setback is required for property lines abutting nonresidential zones. The Proposed Project would provide landscaping in all required landscape setback areas, except in the portions of the Project Site that abut the existing multi- family residential development (along west property line), which includes a pedestrian walkway. As such, the Proposed Project includes a request for modified interior landscape setback to allow such walkway through the required CUP process, as allowed by Section 18.32.070.020 of the AMC. The total landscaped area for the Proposed Project is 107,494 square feet. Private and community open space would be provided as a part of the Proposed Project. These open space areas would be for recreation purposes, which differentiates them from passive landscaped area. The Proposed Projects community open space is approximately 43,196 square feet, which consists of four (4) lushly landscaped courtyards, walking path and a dog park. Private open spaces include patios and balconies ranging in size between 70 and 100 square feet. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 11 Waste Management/Loading and Delivery The Proposed Project would provide solid waste receptacles on the ground level of the proposed parking structure. Seven (7) solid waste rooms are provided throughout the Proposed Project, with three (3) large solid waste rooms located within the parking structure. Four (4) minor solid waste rooms would be located within the residential and commercial floor areas. The Proposed Project would provide all solid waste receptacles in a designated staging area located at the northwestern portion of the Project Site via a trash/retail servicing corridor. This corridor would provide access to the solid waste staging and pick-up area from the parking structure’s primary solid waste collection rooms. The receptacle staging area would be located directly adjacent truck loading areas, where enough turnaround room is provided for a large solid waste truck to enter and exit for pick-up service. Loading and delivery of goods would be provided in the same location as the solid waste pick-up area. The Proposed Project provides a service lane on the northwestern side of the Project Site which would allow all truck deliveries/pick-ups to be made with the required turnaround room. A loading area would be provided (same area as solid waste staging area) which provides access to the parking structure. Pedestrian corridors connect the loading area and commercial floor areas. Security The four (4) community courtyards proposed would be inaccessible by the general public via secured fences/walls and gates. The proposed access driveway located at the southern property line of the Project Site would be secured via a gate; however, the service driveway located at the northwestern portion of the Project Site would not be gated. Entrances to the parking garage would also not be gated. The western property line would include an 8-foot CMU wall adjacent to the existing commercial land use and a 6-foot CMU wall adjacent to the existing multi-family use to the west of the Project Site. The existing chain link fence located at the southern property line would be replaced with an 8-foot CMU wall. Lot Merger A lot merger is proposed to consolidate the three existing parcels into one lot, and public improvements to the Loara Street and Lincoln Avenue street frontages would occur, including new curb cuts for access to the Project Site on both Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, expansion of the public right-of-way for the Lincoln Avenue street frontage, demolition of the existing Lincoln Avenue curb and gutter and sidewalk and construction of new curb and gutter, and sidewalk/landscaped area, 40-foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue westbound left-turn lane, 100-foot extension of the Loara Street northbound left-turn lane, and a 145-foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue eastbound right turn lane. Demolition The Project Site currently contains auto related facilities that includes an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. The demolition phase would consist of demolishing the existing auto dealership with service center on the Project Site that includes approximately 17,000 SF of office building space and 34,300 SF of auto service bays/canopies, totaling 51,300 SF of building space to be demolished. An estimated total of 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 12 174,240 SF of paved lot area would be demolished. The existing pavement is assumed to be an average of 4-inches thick and weigh 145 pounds per square foot, which results in 4,211 tons of pavement that would be removed from the Project Site that would require a total of 650 haul truck trips to remove. In addition, the top two to five feet of soil would be replaced with engineered fill compacted from the excavated soil. Proposed Construction Grading Earthwork quantities for grading include 5,000 cubic yards of cut and 1,500 cubic yards of fill, which would require approximately 3,500 cubic yards of dirt to be exported from the Project Site. The export of dirt would require a total of 438 haul truck trips (average 21.9 haul truck trips per day). Expected onsite equipment utilized during the grading phase include one excavator, one grader, one rubber-tired dozer, and three of either tractors, loaders, or backhoes. The grading activities would also generate 15 automobile trips per day for the workers and six (6) daily water truck trips. Construction Upon completion of grading, the Property Owner/Developer would construct of 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF of leasing office, and 3,413 square feet of retail space(Figure 3 – Conceptual Site Plan). The building construction phase would generate 328 worker trips and 73 vendor trips per day. Expected onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of one crane, three forklifts, one generator, one welder, and three of either tractors, loaders, or backhoes. The residential portion of the Proposed Project would include 64 studio units, 135 one-bedroom units and 116 two-bedroom units, totaling 10 different floor plans (Figures 4 – 8 – Conceptual Floor Plans). The Proposed Project would consist of one structure, comprised of a 381,525 SF residential portion and 239,072 SF parking structure, attached via multiple floors spanning across the access driveways (Figure 9 – Conceptual Elevations and Figures 10 – 13 – Conceptual Building Plan). Mechanical equipment would be roof mounted and screen from view (Figure 13). Portions of the Project Site’s west property lines have a zero setback from the uses on the neighboring properties. An existing 6’ CMU wall on a portion of the western property line adjacent to the multi-family residential land use would remain, and the farthest northwest property line adjacent to the commercial land use would be improved with an 8’ CMU wall. The existing chain link fence on the farthest south property line would be replaced with an 8’ CMU wall. The setback on the Project Site side of the west and south property lines would include landscaping, trees, a meandering decomposed granite path, and enclosed dog park(Figure 14 - Overall Conceptual Landscape Plan) and have a total of 43,196 SF of common open space, including four (4) recreation courtyards (Figure 15 – Conceptual Open Space Plan and Figure 16 – Conceptual Recreation Areas). Planting for the Proposed Project would include a variety of drought tolerant plant species with irrigation system (Figure 17 – Conceptual Tree and Ground Cover Plan, Figure 18 – Conceptual Shrub Plan, and Figure 19 – Conceptual Irrigation Plan). Additional site amenities include 35,001 SF of landscaping, 3,575 SF of synthetic turf, one (1) recreation center with pool, three (3) resident courtyards, a dog park and a dog spa, enhanced decorative paving, and 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 13 pedestrian connectivity from the parking garage to the ground floor retail (Figure 15, Figure 17, and Figure 20 – Conceptual Courtyard Landscape Design). A total of 5,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut and 1,500 cy of fill, which would require 3,500 cy of dirt to be exported, would be performed as a part of the Proposed Project (Figure 21 – Conceptual Grading Plan). On-site drainage would be collected and conveyed to three (3) drywells at proposed discharge locations using proposed on- site area drain systems. The Proposed Project would connect to existing water mains that are serviced by the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD), the water service provider for the City. Existing water mains are located within Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The Proposed Project would connect to an existing 8-inch domestic water line and connect to an existing 12-inch domestic water line at two points in both Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The Project Site is served by an existing public sewer system. The Proposed Project would involve one connection to an existing 8-inch sewer line located within Loara Street and two connections to an existing 10-inch sewer line within Lincoln Avenue. The Proposed Project’s site drainage would be like existing conditions except that on-site drainage would be collected and conveyed to three drywells for water quality purposes using a low flow subdrain system. Best Management Practices (BMP) pertaining to stormwater would be adhered to as part of the Proposed Project. These BMPs would include non-structural source controls, including education for property owners, tenants, and occupants; activity restrictions, common area landscape management; BMP maintenance through scheduled inspections; common area litter control; employee training; common area catch basin inspections; and, street sweeping private streets and parking lots. Structural BMPs for the Proposed Project would include the use of efficient irrigation systems and landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers and source control. Treatment control BMPs would include the use of cartridge media filters within the proposed drywells. All utilities would be installed to serve the Project Site, including the water, sewer, and stormwater (Figure 22 – Conceptual Utilities Plan). The Proposed Project would also include fire access lanes surrounding the Project Site, with exception of a portion of the western property line (Figure 23 – Conceptual Fire Access Plan). Refuse receptacles would be located within the proposed parking garage and would not be externally visible (Figure 24 – Conceptual Waste Management Plan). Proposed materials for the exterior of the project include, but are not limited to, plaster finishing, stone veneer, fiber cement board, and engraved metal paneling (Figure 25 – Conceptual Color and Material Board). Conceptual renderings of the proposed exterior of the project are provided under Figure 26 – Conceptual Project Renderings. Conceptual building sections of the proposed structure are provided under Figure 27 – Conceptual Building Sections. Off-Site Improvements Improvements within the public right-of-way would occur, including new curb cuts for access driveways to the Project Site on both Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, expansion of the public right-of-way for the Lincoln Street frontage, demolition of the Lincoln Street existing curb and gutter and sidewalk and construction of new curb and gutter, and sidewalk/landscaped area, 40- foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue westbound left-turn lane, 100-foot extension of the Loara Street northbound left-turn lane, and a 145-foot extension of the Lincoln Avenue eastbound right 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 14 turn lane. Any associated stormwater quality BMPs would also be included in this work, or an impact fee to address this requirement could be paid, provided an existing improvement to accommodate this requirement is already in place and operational. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 3: Conceptual Site Plan Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 4: Conceptual Floor Plans (1)Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 5: Conceptual Floor Plans (2) Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 6: Conceptual Floor Plans (3)Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 7: Conceptual Floor Plans (4) Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 8: Conceptual Floor Plans (5)Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 9: Conceptual Elevations Source: Architects Orange North Elevation East Elevation South Elevation West Elevation 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 10: Conceptual Building Plans (1)Source: Architects Orange Level 1 Partial Subterranean Parking 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 11: Conceptual Building Plans (2)Source: Architects Orange Level 3 Level 2 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 12: Conceptual Building Plans (3)Source: Architects Orange Partial Roof Plan/Level 4 Residential Over Retail Level 4 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 13: Conceptual Building Plans (4)Source: Architects Orange Roof Plan 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 14: Overall Conceptual Landscape Plan Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 15: Conceptual Open Space PlanSource: Architects of Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 16: Conceptual Recreation AreasSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 17: Conceptual Tree and Ground Cover PlanSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 3: Conceptual Tree and Ground Cover Plan Source: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 18: Conceptual Shrub PlanSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 19: Conceptual Irrigation PlanSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 20: Conceptual Courtyard Landscape PlanSource: Architects Orange 3 2 1 1 2 3 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 21: Conceptual Grading PlanSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 22: Conceptual Utilities PlanSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 23: Conceptual Fire Access PlanSource: Architects of Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Figure 24: Conceptual Waste Management PlanSource: Architecture of Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 25: Conceptual Color and Material BoardSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 26: Conceptual Project RenderingSource: Architects Orange 3 1 6 4 2 5 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Figure 27: Conceptual Building SectionsSource: Architects Orange 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 40 This page is intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 41 2.4 Construction Schedule Construction activities for the Proposed Project are anticipated to begin October 2021 and buildout is expected to be completed by end of the year 2022. Construction duration is estimated to be approximately 14 months. Demolition: Start October 2021 and would take approximately four (4) weeks to complete. Demolition would consist of removing the surface asphalt paving and demolishing existing structures on-site. Site Preparation: The Project Site is currently developed and would not require site preparation activities that consist of removal of rocks and tree stumps. Grading: The grading phase would occur after completion of the demolition phase in November 2021 and is anticipated to take place over approximately four (4) weeks. Consists of 5,000 cubic yards of cut and 1,500 cubic yards of fill, which would require approximately 3,500 cubic yards of dirt to be exported from the Project Site. Building Construction: The building construction would occur after the completion of the grading phase in winter 2021 and is anticipated to take place over approximately 11 months. Paving: The paving of the interior drive aisles would occur after the completion of the building construction phase in winter/spring of 2022 and is anticipated to take place over approximately four (4) weeks. Application of Architectural Coatings: The application of architectural coatings would occur after the completion of the building construction phase in spring of 2022 and is anticipated to take place over approximately four (4) weeks. Although the paving and architectural coating phases are projected to occur consecutively after the completion of the building construction phase, it is possible that all three phases may occur concurrently. 2.5 Discretionary Actions The Applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements for the Proposed Project: • General Plan Amendment (GPA2018-00523) to change the Project Site’s existing General Plan Land Use designation from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High. • Reclassification (RCL2018-00316) to apply Mixed Use Overlay over the existing C-G (General Commercial) base zoning designation. • Conditional Use Permit (CUP2018-05979) to allow a mixed-use project and a modification of standards (interior structural and landscape setback adjacent to residential use). • A Development Agreement (DAG2019-00001) for the proposed voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs (i.e. Senior Safety Net Program). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 42 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST CASE NOs.: Development Project - DEV2017-00128 General Plan Amendment - GPA 2018-00523 Reclassification - RCL 2018-00316 Conditional Use Permit - CUP 2018-05979 Development Agreement - DAG2019-00001 SITE ADDRESS: 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 APNs 250-091-09, 250-091-10, & 250-091-11 PROJECT NAME: 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Andy Uk, Associate Planner (714) 765-5238 auk@anaheim.net PROJECT LOCATION: The Proposed Project is located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (APNs 250-091-09, 250-09110 and 250-091-11) in the City of Anaheim (City), in the northern portion of Orange County, California (Project Site). The Project Site is within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) “Anaheim, California” 7.5-minute quadrangle (2015) and located in the northwestern portion of the City on the south of Lincoln Avenue, west of South Loara Street, north of West Broadway, and east of Euclid Street. Freeway access to the Project Site is provided via Interstate 5 (I-5). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 43 PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: KNT I Enterprises, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial The Project Site is currently designated as General Commercial in the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan and would require a General Plan Amendment (GPA2018-00523) to re- designate the Project Site to Mixed-Use High. ZONING: General Commercial The Project Site is currently zoned General Commercial, which is applied to uses including professional offices, personal services, research and development, retail, and business and financial services. The Proposed Project would require a zoning reclassification of the Project Site to apply the Mixed-Use Overlay to the existing General Commercial (C-G) base zoning designation (C-G/MU Overlay) (RCL 2018-00316). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Proposed Project includes the demolition of existing auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility, and construction of a 381,525 SF mixed use building containing 315 residential apartment (rental) unit complex with 2,031 SF leasing office and amenities, 639 on-site parking spaces (636 spaces in a 239,072 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 44 SF parking garage and three surface spaces) 3,413 SF of retail space. The proposed building would be 72-feet 6-inches at its highest point, which is located at the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The proposed parking structure would be 47-feet to top of parapet and 54-feet 4-inches to top of elevator overrun. The Proposed Project utilizes the Mixed-Use Overlay zone standards at a density of 60 units/acre and features a four-story mixed-use building comprised of residential and commercial uses. PROJECT SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The Project Site is 5.25-acres consisting of three parcels, located south of Lincoln Avenue, west of South Loara Street, north of West Broadway, and east of Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim. The Project Site contains auto related facilities that includes an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. Topography on the Project Site is generally flat at approximately 129 to 135 feet above mean sea level. Existing site drainage occurs in three directions and discharges from the property at West Lincoln Avenue, South Loara Street, and West Pampas Lane. Vehicular access to the Project Site is currently provided via three driveway access points on South Loara Street and one on West Lincoln Street. The Project Site is located within an area with mixed zoning, including a predominant amount of General Commercial, Industrial, Multiple-Family Residential and Single-Family Residential zoned lots. The surrounding area includes industrial and commercial uses to the north, across West Lincoln Avenue, and to the east, commercial and multiple family residential uses, and an elementary school to the south, and commercial and multiple family residential uses to the west. Beyond the adjacent uses to the Project Site are commercial, single-family and multiple-family residential uses located to the west, south, and southwest, and commercial and industrial uses to the east, southeast, north, and northwest. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED: N/A CONSULTATION WITH NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES: In accordance with the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52, the City sent notification to three (3) Native American Tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area on August 1, 2018. Of the tribes notified, The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation requested formal government-to-government consultation under AB 52. Consultation was concluded on October 30, 2019 with, The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. Mitigation measures have been added to address the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources and human remains during groundbreaking activities. Please see Section 4.18, Tribal Cultural Resources of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist for more detail. In accordance with the requirements of Senate Bill (SB) 18, the City sent notification to eight (8) Native American Tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area on August 21, 2018. Of the tribes notified, The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation requested formal government-to-government consultation under SB 18. Consultation was concluded on October 30, 2019 with, The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation. Mitigation 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 45 measures have been added to address the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources and human remains during groundbreaking activities. Please see Section 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist for more detail. Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 46 3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the Proposed Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. None of the environmental factors were checked because the Proposed Project would not result in any potential significant impacts after the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. ☐ Aesthetics ☐ Agriculture & Forestry Resources ☐ Air Quality ☐ Biological Resources ☐ Cultural Resources ☐ Energy ☐ Geology/Soils ☐ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ☐ Hazards & Hazardous Material ☐ Hydrology/Water Quality ☐ Land Use/Planning ☐ Mineral Resources ☐ Noise ☐ Population/Housing ☐ Public Services ☐ Recreation ☐ Transportation ☐ Tribal Cultural Resources ☐ Utilities/Service Systems ☐ Wildfire ☐ Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.2 Determination: Based on this initial evaluation: ☐ I find that the Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ☒ I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ☐ I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ☐ I find that the Proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ☐ I find that although the Proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Proposed Project, nothing further is required. _________________________________________ March 24, 2020 Signature Date Andy Uk Associate Planner 714-765-5238 Printed Name/Title Phone 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 47 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section. 3) Response Column Heading Definitions: a) Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. c) Less Than Significant Impact applies where the project creates no significant impacts, only Less Than Significant impacts. d) No Impact applies where a project does not create an impact in that category. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed (e.g., the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15062(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., the General Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 6) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 48 4.1 Aesthetics Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experiences from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact: A scenic vista is a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the benefit of the public. According to the General Plan EIR (May 2004), views and vistas in the Hill and Canyon Area are important visual amenities in the City. No other important views and vistas exist are identified in the City. However, the Project Site is over 5-miles west of the Hill and Canyon areas, with intervening topography and urban development located between the Project Site and designated areas. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not have visual impacts on the designated scenic vistas. The Project Site is generally flat and is surrounded by commercial, industrial and single and multiple-family residential uses. Therefore, potential impacts associated with a scenic vista would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact: The Project Site is currently occupied by auto related facilities, which includes an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. The City General Plan’s Circulation Element designates a portion of Santa Ana Canyon Road as a scenic expressway, and the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) designates the a portion of the State Route 91 (SR-91) and State Route 55 (SR-55) as a state scenic highway, with an additional portion of the 91-expressway eligible for designation as a scenic highway. These state scenic highways are approximately 5-miles directly east of the Project Site with intervening urban development. The Project Site does not contain any scenic resources, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings. Therefore, no impacts associated with scenic resources within a state scenic highway would occur and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 49 c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site currently consists of auto-related commercial uses with a portion of its operations located outside (vehicle sales lot). The surrounding uses include single-family and multiple-family residential buildings, industrial and commercial uses with one- and two-story buildings. While the Proposed Project would involve the construction of a four- story mixed-use structure, visually pleasing elements such as landscaping and elevated architectural design lessen the visual impact of the development. The Proposed Project requests the reclassification of the zoning to allow for the Mixed-Use overlay; however, the existing zoning for the Project Site would remain General Commercial. The application of the Mixed-Use overlay would result in the Proposed Project being consistent with applicable zoning standards for mixed-use development. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project is for the construction of 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF of leasing office, and 3,413 square feet of retail space. The Project Site is located adjacent to existing commercial, industrial and single-family and multiple-family homes. Construction of the mixed-use development would primarily emit nighttime lighting from exterior security lighting. Operation of the mixed-use development would primarily emit nighttime lighting from exterior security lighting, festive roof deck lighting, and interior lights. Existing sources of light on the Project Site include nighttime security lighting. The amount of lighting generated by the Proposed Project would be like that used in the surrounding areas. Residential uses on the Project Site would result in less than significant increases in nighttime light or glare as the Proposed Project is replacing an existing commercial use in an urbanized neighborhood, which utilizes light posts throughout the existing outdoor vehicle sales lot. The Proposed Project would use typical construction materials such a wood, stucco and glass, and would not use reflective materials that would result in glare for the residential units. The retail and office portion of the Proposed Project would be oriented away from all surrounding residential uses and would face Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. Glass store fronts would be limited to the ground floor level, with architectural design elements that would break up the glass storefront area and reduce possible glare, such as stucco archways and stone columns. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Proposed Project would be subject to building code requirements that include an assessment of exterior lighting plans to ensure lighting fixtures are shielded to prevent light spill. With the layout of the Proposed Project (orienting residential uses toward residential uses, and retail/office toward street frontages) and the approval of lighting plans, there would be no new or increase in significant impacts related to lighting and glare. Therefore, potential impacts associated with light and glare would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 50 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Aesthetics apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Aesthetics would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 51 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact: According to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Important Farmland map database,2 the Proposed Project is designated as Urban and Built-Up Land, as are all surrounding land uses. The Project Site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, no impacts associated with farmland would occur and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact: The Proposed Project is zoned General Commercial (C-G) and not located on parcels zoned for agricultural use. There are no existing agricultural uses on the Project Site. According to the California Department of Conservation’s Williamson Act Program map,1F1F 3 the Project Site is not located on or adjacent to lands under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, no impacts 2 ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/ora16.pdf Accessed September 10, 2019 3 State of California Williamson Act Contract Land; see: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange_WA_03_04.pdf Accessed September 10, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 52 associated with agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract would occur, and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact: Public Resources Code 12220 (g) defines forestland as that which “can support 10- percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits.” CA Government Code 51104 (g) identifies a timberland production zone as “an area which has been zoned pursuant to Section 51112 or 51113 and is devoted to and used for growing and harvesting timber, or for growing and harvesting timber and compatible uses.” The Project Site is located within an urbanized area, and is not located near or adjacent to forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Therefore, no impacts associated with forest land or timberland would occur and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact: The Project Site is currently paved with asphalt and used for outdoor storage of vehicles and developed with auto-related commercial buildings. The Project Site and surrounding properties do not contain any forestland, as the Project Site and the surrounding properties are categorized as urban and built out according to the California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Important Farmland map database. Therefore, no impacts associated with forest land would occur and no mitigation would be required. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact: The Project Site is currently paved with asphalt and used for outdoor storage of vehicles and developed with auto-related commercial buildings. The Project Site does not contain any farmland or forestland. The construction of the Proposed Project would not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or the conversation of forestland to non-forest use. Therefore, no impacts associated with forest land or timberland would occur and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Agriculture and Forestry Services apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion There would be no impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Agriculture and Forestry Services and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 53 4.3 Air Quality Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ d) Result in other emission (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people?) ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ An Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to air quality associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix A - Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis, November 2019, Revised March 2020). The results of the analysis are based on CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. The Project Site is located within the north central part of Orange County in the City of Anaheim, in Air Monitoring Area 17 of the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) that includes all of Orange County, as well as the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The Basin has been designated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a federal non- attainment area for ozone, fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and partial non-attainment for lead. Currently, the Basin is in attainment with the National Ambient Air Quality (NAAQS) standards for carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and respirable particulate matter (PM10). The Basin has been designated by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a non-attainment area for Ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. Currently, the SCAB is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, SO2, lead, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency responsible for comprehensive air pollution control within the Basin. SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. Many air quality impacts that derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominate pollution generators in the Air Basin, often occurs hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 54 significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table 2 - SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance. Table 2 – SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Lead Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Operation 55 55 550 150 150 55 3 Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project- related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), July 2008, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The LST Methodology provides Look-Up Tables with different thresholds based on the location and size of the Project Site and distance to the nearest sensitive receptors. The Project Site is in Air Monitoring Area 17. The Look-Up Tables provided in the LST Methodology include Project Site acreage sizes of 1-acre, 2-acres and 5-acres. The 5-acre Project Site values in the Look-Up Tables have been utilized in this analysis, since that is the nearest size available for the 5.25-acre Project Site. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School that is located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25-meter thresholds. Table 3 - SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance shows the LSTs for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 for both construction and operational activities. Table 3 – SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance Activity Allowable Emissions (pounds/day)1 NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction 183 1,253 13 7 Operation 183 1,253 3 2 Notes: 1 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 55 Environmental Analysis a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a Proposed Project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the Proposed Project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the Proposed Project with the AQMP. If the decision-makers determine that the Proposed Project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A Proposed Project would be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the forecasted growth assumptions incorporated within the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance shown in Tables 2 and 3 with the implementation of mitigation measures (MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2), as shown in Table 4 - Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation and Table 5 - Mitigated Construction- Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions, and detailed in Section 4.3.1(b). For MM AIR-1, all interior areas of the residential portion of the proposed structure would be required by the painting contractor to utilize “Super-Compliance” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 and contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less. MM AIR-2 would require all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50-horsepower meet Tier 4 Final emissions standards and be registered with CARB and labelled detailing the equipment meets the Tier 4 standard. Therefore, with implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2, short-term impacts associated with the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Air pollutant emissions resulting from the ongoing operation of the Proposed Project would be inconsequential on a regional basis and would not result in significant impacts, as shown in Table 7 - Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions and detailed in Section 4.3.1(b). Long-term operational local pollutant concentrations would not exceed air quality standards, as shown in 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 56 Table 9 - Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Therefore, long-term impacts associated with the Proposed Project would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. With implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2, the Proposed Project would be consistent with Criterion 1. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the Proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure the analyses conducted for the Proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The AQMP is developed through use of the planning forecasts provided in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) and the Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). The RTP/SCS is a major planning document for the regional transportation and land use network within Southern California. The RTP/SCS is a long-range plan that is required by federal and state requirements placed on SCAG and is updated every four years. The FTIP provides long-range planning for future transportation improvement projects that are constructed with state and/or federal funds within Southern California. Local governments are required to use these plans as the basis of their plans for the purpose of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For the Proposed Project, the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in AQMP. The Project Site is currently designated as General Commercial in the General Plan and is zoned General Commercial (C-G). The proposed mixed-use residential and commercial development would require both a General Plan Amendment to Mixed-Use High and a zoning reclassification to apply Mixed-Use (MU) Overlay to the existing General Commercial based zone (C-G) to allow for the commercial retail component of the Proposed Project. Although the Proposed Project is currently inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation and zoning for the Project Site, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the adjacent residential and commercial land uses and would be in substantial compliance with the Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, due to the Proposed Project’s consistency with the surrounding neighborhood, the Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designations with respect to the regional forecasts utilized by the AQMPs. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Project Site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would be consistent with Criterion 2. With implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2 the Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the conflict with or obstruction of implementation of the applicable air quality plan would be less than significant with the implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 57 b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard with implementation of mitigation measures. Construction Emissions The construction activities for the Proposed Project was modeled as starting in October 2021 and would be completed by the end of 2022, for a total duration of 14 months. Construction activities would include demolition of the existing auto-related commercial structures and pavement on the Project Site, grading of the Project Site that would include the export of approximately 3,500 cubic yards of dirt, building construction of the proposed 381,525 square foot mixed use building and 239,072 square foot parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. The construction emissions are analyzed for both regional and local air quality impacts. Short-Term Construction Related Regional Impacts The CalEEMod model utilized to calculate the construction-related regional emissions from the Proposed Project and the input parameters utilized in this analysis are detailed in Section 7.1. (Appendix A). The worst-case summer or winter daily construction-related criteria pollutant emissions from the Proposed Project for each phase of construction activities are shown in Table 4 - Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation and the CalEEMod daily printouts are in Appendix A. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 4 also shows the combined regional criteria pollutant emissions from year 2022 building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 58 Table 4 – Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition1 Onsite 3.17 31.44 21.57 0.04 4.72 1.92 Offsite 0.32 8.96 2.97 0.03 0.80 0.24 Total 3.49 40.40 24.54 0.07 5.52 2.16 Grading1 Onsite 2.29 24.74 15.86 0.03 4.12 2.58 Offsite 0.24 6.23 2.19 0.02 0.61 0.18 Total 2.53 30.97 18.05 0.05 4.73 2.76 Building Construction (Year 2021) Onsite 1.90 17.43 16.58 0.03 0.96 0.90 Offsite 1.54 7.62 11.82 0.05 4.17 1.14 Total 3.44 25.05 28.40 0.08 5.13 2.04 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings Onsite 126.22 28.15 32.75 0.05 1.46 1.36 Offsite 1.78 7.34 13.39 0.06 4.95 1.38 Total 128.00 35.49 46.14 0.11 6.41 2.74 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 128.00 40.40 46.14 0.11 6.41 2.76 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? Yes No No No No No Notes: 1 Demolition and Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 2 Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 3 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Table 4 shows the combined building construction, paving and architectural coatings activities for the Proposed Project would exceed the SCAQMD’s regional significance threshold for VOC emissions. The other analyzed emissions of NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 would be within the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for all phases of construction. This would be considered a significant impact. MM AIR-1 would require that for the interior areas of the residential portion of the Proposed Project, the Property Owner/Developer shall require that the painting contractor utilize “Super- Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 and contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less. A list of “Super-Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural-coatings/super-compliant-coatings MM AIR-2 would require that all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards. Although MM AIR- 2 provides a nominal improvement to VOC emissions, MM AIR-2 is required for the construction- related cancer risk assessment provided in Appendix A and is included here to show the anticipated criteria pollutant emissions with implementation of all proposed mitigation. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 59 The CalEEMod model was re-run with the residential interior architectural coatings set to 10 grams per liter of VOC emission (default is 50 grams per liter) and with mitigation of Tier 4 Final set for all off-road equipment that is greater than 50 horsepower. A summary of the CalEEMod results with implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2 are shown in Table 5 - Mitigated Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions and the mitigated CalEEMod printouts are provided in Appendix A. Table 5 – Mitigated Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1 Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition2 Onsite3 0.46 2.00 23.28 0.04 3.23 0.54 Offsite4 0.32 8.96 2.97 0.03 0.80 0.24 Total 0.78 10.96 26.25 0.07 4.03 0.78 Grading2 Onsite 0.36 1.57 17.75 0.03 3.30 1.60 Offsite 0.24 6.23 2.19 0.02 0.61 0.18 Total 0.60 7.80 19.94 0.05 3.91 1.78 Building Construction (Year 2021) Onsite 0.59 2.74 17.68 0.03 0.11 0.11 Offsite 1.54 7.62 11.82 0.05 4.17 1.14 Total 2.13 10.36 29.50 0.08 4.28 1.25 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings Onsite 53.10 4.04 36.79 0.05 0.14 0.14 Offsite 1.78 7.34 13.39 0.06 4.95 1.38 Total 54.88 11.38 50.18 0.11 5.09 1.52 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 54.88 11.38 50.18 0.11 5.09 1.78 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Calculated emissions include implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2. 2 Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 3 Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 4 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Table 5 shows that with implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants for any phase of construction activities. Therefore, with implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2, the Proposed Project’s construction related impacts to regional air quality would be less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 60 Short-Term Construction Related Local Impacts Construction-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed through utilization of the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The LST Methodology found the primary criteria pollutant emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. In order to determine if any of these pollutants require a detailed analysis of the local air quality impacts, each phase of construction was screened using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily onsite emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the Proposed Project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table 6 - Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model for the different construction phases and the calculated localized emissions thresholds (Appendix A). Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table 6 also shows the combined local criteria pollutant emissions from year 2022 building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table 6 – Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1,2 Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition2 3.12 23.65 3.33 0.57 Grading2 2.35 18.02 3.38 1.62 Building Construction (Year 2021) 3.69 19.16 0.63 0.25 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings 4.96 38.46 0.76 0.31 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 3.12 38.46 3.38 1.62 SCAQMD Local Construction Thresholds3 183 1,253 13 7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 The calculated emissions include implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2 as shown in Table 5. The Pollutant Emissions include 100% of the On-Site emissions (off-road equipment and fugitive dust) and 1/8 of the Off-Site emissions (on road trucks and worker vehicles), in order to account for the on-road emissions that occur within a ¼ mile of the Project Site. 2 Demolition and Grading phases based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 3 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. Table 6 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds during either grading, combined building construction and architectural coatings, or paving phases with implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2. Additionally, it is mandatory for all construction projects in the SCAB to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for Fugitive Dust. Specific Rule 403 control requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 61 areas, re-establishing ground cover as quickly as possible, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. Vehicle and equipment speeds would be limited to 15 miles per hour to prevent dust suspension. Compliance with Rule 403 would reduce PM2.5 and PM10 emissions associated with construction activities by approximately 61 percent. Therefore, potential impacts to local air quality impact would be less than significant from construction of the Proposed Project. Operational Emission The on-going operation of the Proposed Project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project-generated vehicle trips, emissions from energy usage, and onsite area source emissions created from the on-going use of the Proposed Project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the Proposed Project. Operations Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations-related regional criteria air quality impacts created by the Proposed Project were analyzed through use of the CalEEMod model and the input parameters utilized in Appendix A. The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, SO¬2, PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions created from the Proposed Project’s long-term operations were calculated and are summarized in Table 7 - Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions and the CalEEMod daily emissions printouts are shown in Appendix A. Table 7 – Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources1 9.11 0.37 26.09 0.00 0.15 0.15 Energy Usage2 0.10 0.88 0.37 0.01 0.07 0.07 Mobile Sources3 2.31 4.01 23.26 0.08 7.98 2.16 Total Emissions 11.52 5.26 49.72 0.09 8.20 2.38 SCQAMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, natural gas fireplaces, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of emissions from natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Source: Calculated from CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 and CAPCO, 1997. Table 7 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants created from operation of the Proposed Project would exceed SCAQMD’s regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, potential impacts to regional air quality impact would be less than significant from operation of the Proposed Project. Table 7 shows that the primary source of operational air emissions would be created from mobile source emissions that would be generated throughout the Air Basin. Any adverse health impacts created from the Proposed Project should be assessed on a basin-wide level. The SCAB has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non-attainment area for ozone, PM2.5, and partial non-attainment for lead. In addition, PM10 is designated by the State as non-attainment. VOC and NOx are ozone precursors, as such they have been considered as non-attainment 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 62 pollutants. According to the 2016 AQMP, in 2016 the total emissions of: VOC was 500 tons per year; NOx was 522 tons per year; SOx was 18 tons per year; and PM2.5 was 66 tons per year. Since the 2016 AQMP did not calculate total PM10 emissions, the total PM10 emissions are obtained from The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, for the year 2020. The project contribution to each criteria pollutant in the SCAB is shown in Table 8 - Project’s Contribution to Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin. Table 8 – Project’s Contribution to Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Emissions Source VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Project Emissions1 11.52 5.26 49.72 0.09 8.20 2.38 Total Emissions in Air Basin2 1,000,000 1,044,000 4,246,000 36,000 322,000 132,000 Project’s Percent of Air Emissions 0.0012% 0.0005% 0.0012% 0.0003% 0.0025% 0.0018% SCAQMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 From the project’s total operational emissions shown in Table 7. 2 VOC, NOx, CO, SO2 and PM2.5 from 2016 AQMP and PM10 from the California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition. As shown in Table 8, the Proposed Project would increase criteria pollutant emissions by as much as 0.0025 percent for PM10 in the SCAB. Due to these nominal increases in the Air Basin-wide criteria pollutant emissions, no increases in days of non-attainment are anticipated to occur from operation of the Proposed Project. Operation of the Proposed Project is not anticipated to result in a quantitative increase in premature deaths, asthma in children, days children will miss school, asthma-related emergency room visits, or an increase in acute bronchitis among children due to the criteria pollutants created by the Proposed Project, Therefore, potential impacts to air quality would be less than significant. Operations Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The Proposed Project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on-site operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards of 20 ppm over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the SCAB was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the SCAB and 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 63 in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the SCAB was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO hot spot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles4 during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict a violation of CO standards. Since the nearby intersections to the Proposed Project are much smaller with less traffic than what was analyzed by the SCAQMD, no local CO Hotspot are anticipated to be created from the Proposed Project and no CO Hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, potential impacts to local, long-term air quality with the on-going use of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations Project-related air emissions from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances may have the potential to create emissions areas that exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from onsite operations were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables and the methodology described in LST Methodology. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the Proposed Project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table 9 - Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes area sources, energy usage, and vehicles operating in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site and the calculated emissions thresholds. Table 9 – Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Onsite Emission Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources 0.37 26.09 0.15 0.15 Energy Usage 0.88 0.37 0.07 0.07 Onsite Vehicle Emissions1 0.50 2.91 1.00 0.27 Total Emissions 1.75 29.37 1.22 0.49 SCAQMD Local Operational Thresholds2 183 1,253 3 2 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Onsite vehicle emissions based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions, which is the estimated portion of vehicle emissions occurring within a quarter mile of the Project Site. 2 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. 4 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway; Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. (Appendix A, p. 62) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 64 Table 9 shows that the on-going operations of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, potential impacts associated with local air quality due to operations-related onsite emissions and the on-going operations of the Proposed Project would be less than significant and the Proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. With implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2 the Proposed Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Therefore, potential impacts associated with cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant would be less than significant with the implementation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The local concentrations of criteria pollutant emissions produced in the nearby vicinity of the Proposed Project, which may expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations, have been calculated in Section 4.3.1(b). for both construction and operations. The discussion below also includes an analysis of the potential impacts from toxic air contaminant emissions. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project Site are the multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School that is located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site. Construction Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The construction activities for the Proposed Project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto-related commercial structures and pavement on the Project Site,, grading of the Project Site, building construction of the proposed mixed use building and parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. Construction activities may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of localized criteria pollutant concentrations and from toxic air contaminant emissions created from onsite construction equipment. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Construction The local air quality impacts from construction of the Proposed Project are analyzed in Section 4.3.1(b) and found that the construction of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed in Appendix A. Therefore, construction-related impacts to local air quality would be less than significant. Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs) Impacts from Construction The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the Proposed Project. Health risks from TACs are twofold. First, TACs are carcinogens according to the State of California. Second, short-term acute and long-term chronic exposure to TACs can cause health effects to the respiratory system. Each of these health risks is discussed below. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 65 Construction-Related Cancer Risks from DPM Emissions According to the OEHHA Guidance (OEHHA, 2015) and Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212, (SCAQMD, 2017), the cancer risk should be calculated using the following formula: Cancer Risk = [Dose-inh (mg/(Kg-day)] * [Cancer Potency Factor (kg-day)/mg]*[1x106] * Age Sensitivity Factor * Fraction of Time at Home Dose-inh = (Cair * DBR * A * EF * ED * 106) / AT Where: Cair [Concentration in air (µg/m3)] = (Calculated by AERMOD Model) DBR [Daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight – day)] A [Inhalation absorption factor] EF [Exposure frequency (days/year)] ED [Exposure duration (years)] 106 [Micrograms to milligrams conversion] AT [Average time period over which exposure is averaged in days] The cancer risk parameters used in this evaluation for both the nearby residential uses and nearby school uses are shown in Table 10 - Cancer Risk Calculation Parameters. Table 10 – Cancer Risk Calculation Parameters Parameter Residential Uses School Uses Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg-day) for DPM 1.1 1.1 Daily Breathing Rate1 (L/kg body weight-day) 934 934 Inhalation Absorption Factor 1 1 Exposure Frequency (days/year) 350 250 Exposure Duration2 (years) 1.2 1.2 Age Sensitivity Factor 10 10 Fraction of Time at Home 1.0 1.0 Averaging Time3 (days) 25,550 25,550 Potential Cancer Risk = Cair * 169 Cair * 121 Notes: 1 Based on 95th percentile breathing rate of 361 for 3rd trimester for 3 months and 1,090 for 0 to 2 years for 11 months (OEHHA, 2015; SCAQMD, 2017). 2 Based on the duration of construction activities for the Proposed Project, which was obtained from the default construction schedule provided in the CalEEMod model. 3 Based on a 70-year average lifetime (OEHHA, 2015; SCAQMD, 2017) As shown in Table 10, the potential cancer risk for residential receptors equates to Cair * 169 and for school receptors equates to Cair * 121. Table 11 provides a summary of the maximum calculated DPM concentrations at each nearby sensitive receptor as well as the coordinates of the receptor where the maximum DPM concentration was measured for each nearby sensitive receptor. Table 11 - Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation also shows the calculated cancer risk based on whether it the receptor is located at either a nearby residential or school use, which have been based on the parameters detailed in Table 10. The AERMOD model run printouts are provided in Appendix A. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 66 Table 11 – Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation Sensitive Receiver Land Use Receptor Location1 Annual DPM Concentration (µg/m3) Cancer Risk Per Million People2 X Y 1631 Pampas Lane MFR 413,160 3,743,879 0.813 137.3 1651 Pampas Lane MFR 413,076 3,743,854 0.323 54.5 1655 Pampas Lane MFR 413,052 3,743,854 0.270 45.6 1675 Pampas Lane MFR 413,030 3,743,856 0.233 39.3 1666 Pampas Lane MFR 413,038 3,743,770 0.169 28.5 1650 Pampas Lane MFR 413,075 3,743,770 0.203 34.3 229 S Loara St SFR 413,238 3,743,742 0.268 45.3 Loara Elementary School School 413,224 3,743,746 0.289 34.8 Fairmont Private School School 413,388 3,743,746 0.144 17.4 SCAQMD Threshold 10 Exceed Threshold? Yes Notes: 1 Receptor location based on World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). 2 The residential cancer risk based on: Cair * 169. The school cancer risk based on Cair * 121. Source: Calculated from ISC-AERMOD View Version 9.8.1. Table 11 shows that the Proposed Project’s construction related DPM emissions would result in a cancer risk as high as 137.3 per million persons at the nearby sensitive receptors. The cancer risk calculated at all analyzed sensitive receptors would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 per million. This would be considered a significant impact. MM AIR-2 requires all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower to meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards. The CalEEMod model was re-run with implementation of MM AIR-2 (see Appendix A), which found that with implementation of MM AIR-2, the off-road diesel powered construction equipment would create a total of 0.01791 tons of PM10 exhaust or 0.083 pounds per day of PM10 exhaust from construction of the Proposed Project. For reference, implementation of MM AIR-2 would reduce the off-road equipment PM10 exhaust by 86 percent. The AERMOD model was re-run with the emission rate for the area source that represents the off-road equipment PM10 exhaust changed to 5.78E-08 grams per second, that was calculated by converting the 0.083 pound per day to grams per second based on a 9-hour workday (7 a.m. to 3 p.m.) and then dividing by 20,044 square meters. No other changes were made to the AERMOD model run. A summary of the AERMOD results with implementation of MM AIR-2 are shown in Table 12 - Mitigated Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors and the mitigated AERMOD printouts are provided in Appendix A. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 67 Table 12 – Mitigated Construction-Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Sensitive Receiver Land Use Receptor Location1 Annual DPM Concentration (µg/m3) Cancer Risk Per Million People2 X Y 1631 Pampas Lane MFR 413,160 3,743,879 0.013 2.2 1651 Pampas Lane MFR 413,076 3,743,854 0.004 0.6 1655 Pampas Lane MFR 413,052 3,743,854 0.003 0.5 1675 Pampas Lane MFR 413,030 3,743,856 0.003 0.4 1666 Pampas Lane MFR 413,038 3,743,770 0.001 0.3 1650 Pampas Lane MFR 413,075 3,743,770 0.002 0.3 229 S Loara St SFR 413,238 3,743,742 0.003 0.5 Loara Elementary School School 413,224 3,743,746 0.003 0.4 Fairmont Private School School 413,388 3,743,746 0.002 0.2 SCAQMD Threshold 10 Exceed Threshold? No Notes: 1 Receptor location based on World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). 2 The residential cancer risk based on: Cair * 169. The school cancer risk based on Cair * 121. Source: Calculated from ISC-AERMOD View Version 9.8.1. Table 12 shows that with implementation of MM AIR-2, the DPM emissions created from construction of the Proposed Project would not result in a cancer risk that exceeds SCAQMD’s thresholds for any nearby sensitive receptor. Therefore, with implementation of MM AIR-2, impacts from the construction of the Proposed Project would not create a significant cancer risk to the nearby sensitive receptors. Construction-Related Non-Cancer Risks from DPM Emissions In addition to the cancer risk from exposure to TAC emissions there is also the potential TAC exposure may result in adverse health impacts from acute and chronic illnesses. Chronic Health Impacts Chronic health effects are characterized by prolonged or repeated exposure to a TAC over many days, months, or years. Symptoms from chronic health impacts may not be immediately apparent and are often irreversible. The chronic hazard index is based on the most impacted sensitive receptor from the Proposed Project and is calculated from the annual average concentrations of PM10. The relationship for non-cancer chronic health effects is given by the equation: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 68 HIDPM = CDPM / RELDPM Where, HIDPM = Hazard Index; an expression of the potential for non-cancer health effects. CDPM = Annual average diesel particulate matter concentration in µg/m3. RELDPM= Reference Exposure Level (REL) for diesel particulate matter; the diesel particulate matter concentration at which no adverse health effects are anticipated. The RELDPM is 5 µg/m3. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as protective for the respiratory system has established this concentration. As shown in Table 12, with implementation of MM AIR-2, the AERMOD model found that the highest annual DPM concentration of 0.013 µg/m3 for DPM chronic non-cancer risk emissions. The resulting Hazard Index is: HIDPM = 0.013 / 5 = 0.0026 The criterion for significance is a Chronic Hazard Index increase of 1.0 or greater. Therefore, the non-cancer chronic health risks from construction of the Proposed Project to the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Acute Health Impacts Acute health effects are characterized by sudden and severe exposure and rapid absorption of a TAC. Normally, a single large exposure is involved. Acute health effects are often treatable and reversible. The acute hazard index is calculated from the maximum 1-hour concentrations of PM10 at the point of maximum impact (PMI), which has been calculated with the AERMOD model with implementation of MM AIR-2 (Appendix A). The relationship for non-cancer acute health effects is given by the equation: AHI = C / AREL Where, AHI = Acute Hazard Index; an expression of the potential for non-cancer health effects. C = Maximum hourly concentration of either PM10 in µg/m3. AREL = Acute Reference Exposure Level. No acute risk has been found to be directly created from DPM, so there is no AREL assigned to DPM, however in order to provide an DPM equivalent AREL, the ARELs from all of the other TACs that are emitted in diesel exhaust were added together based on their diesel weighting shown in Table A (Appendix A). This resulted in a diesel emission weighted equivalent AREL of 137 µg/m3. The AERMOD model found that the highest 1-hour concentration at the PMI is 0.614 µg/m3 for DPM equivalent acute non-cancer risk emissions. The resulting Hazard Index is: AHI = 0.614 / 137 = 0.00448 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 69 The criterion for significance is an Acute Hazard Index increase of 1.0 or greater, which is detailed in Appendix A. Therefore, the non-cancer acute health risks from construction of the Proposed Project to the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. With implementation of MM AIR-2, impacts exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations from construction of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Operations-Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The on-going operations of the Proposed Project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions. Local criteria pollutant impacts from onsite operations, and toxic air contaminant impacts. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The Mobile Sources Activity in Table 7 shows that no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, potential impacts exposing offsite sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations from operation of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the Proposed Project would occur from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, natural gas only fireplaces, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances. Table 8 shows that the operation of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, potential impacts from the on-going operations of the Proposed Project to local air quality due to on-site emissions would be less than significant. Operations-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. As detailed in Appendix A, Section 7.1 under operational mobile emissions, the residential portion of the Proposed Project would generate approximately 34 daily truck trips and the retail portion of the Proposed Project would generate eight daily trips, resulting in a total of 42 daily truck trips generated from the Proposed Project. A trip is defined as either to the Project Site or from the Project Site to another location, so the 42 daily truck trips represent 21 daily truck deliveries. According to Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Project, prepared by CAPCOA, July 2009, sensitive receptors should not be placed near distribution centers that generate more than 100 truck deliveries per day or more than 40 truck deliveries per day with transport refrigeration units (TRUs). Since the Proposed 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 70 Project would generate well below the 100 trucks per day threshold that would have the potential to create a significant TAC impact at the nearby sensitive receptors, as determined by CAPCOA’s screening criteria, potential TAC impacts during the on-going operations of the Proposed Project would be less than significant. Therefore, potential impacts exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations from operation of the Proposed Project would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the project result in other emission (such as those leading to odors adversely affecting a substantial number of people)? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Individual responses to odors are highly variable and can result in a variety of effects. Generally, the impact of an odor results from a variety of factors such as frequency, duration, offensiveness, location, and sensory perception. The frequency is a measure of how often an individual is exposed to an odor in the ambient environment. The intensity refers to an individual’s or group’s perception of the odor strength or concentration. The duration of an odor refers to the elapsed time over which an odor is experienced. The offensiveness of the odor is the subjective rating of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of an odor. The location accounts for the type of area in which a potentially affected person lives, works, or visits; the type of activity in which he or she is engaged; and the sensitivity of the impacted receptor. Sensory perception has four major components: detectability, intensity, character, and hedonic tone. The detection (or threshold) of an odor is based on a panel of responses to the odor. There are two types of thresholds: the odor detection threshold and the recognition threshold. The detection threshold is the lowest concentration of an odor that will elicit a response in a percentage of the people that live and work in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site and is typically presented as the mean (or 50 percent of the population). The recognition threshold is the minimum concentration that is recognized as having a characteristic odor quality, this is typically represented by recognition by 50 percent of the population. The intensity refers to the perceived strength of the odor. The odor character is what the substance smells like. The hedonic tone is a judgment of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor. The hedonic tone varies in subjective experience, frequency, odor character, odor intensity, and duration. Potential odor impacts have been analyzed separately for construction and operations. Construction-Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of coatings such as asphalt pavement, paints and solvents and from emissions from diesel equipment. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process would be temporary and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the Project Site’s boundaries. Due to the transitory nature of construction odors, adverse impacts associated with construction related odors would be less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 71 Operations-Related Odor Impacts The Proposed Project would consist of the development of 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF of leasing office, and 3,413 square feet of retail space. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the Proposed Project would primarily occur from the outdoor kitchen, BBQ areas, and trash storage areas. Pursuant to City regulations, permanent trash enclosures that protect trash bins from rain as well as limit air circulation would be required for the trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the Project Site and through compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402 and City trash storage regulations, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the Proposed Project. Therefore, adverse impacts associated with operation related odors would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures MM AIR-1: Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the building plans that the painting contractor for the interior areas of the residential portion of Proposed Project shall utilize “Super-Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113 and contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. A list of “Super-Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural-coatings/super-compliant-coatings MM AIR-2: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall include a note on the grading and building plans that off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards, and shall ensure compliance during construction activities. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Air Quality would be less than significant with the incorporation of MM AIR-1 and MM AIR-2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 72 4.4 Biological Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact: The Project Site is an approximate 5.25-acre site in an urbanized area of Anaheim that is surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial development, including a railroad line to the east of the Project Site. The Project Site is entirely paved with asphalt and the existing vegetation on the Project Site, which includes a few trees and shrubs., are minimal. The Project Site has no capacity to support any species of plants or wildlife that would be identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Therefore, no impact associated with special status species of plants or wildlife would occur and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 73 b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact: Riparian habitat is composed of the trees and other vegetation and physical features normally found on the stream banks and flood plains associated with streams, lakes, or other bodies of water. The City of Anaheim is largely urbanized; however, there are a few remaining areas of natural habitat, including portions of the Santa Ana River located in the eastern part of the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The Project Site is a 5.25-acre parcel in an urbanized area of western Anaheim that is surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial development, including a railroad line to the east of the Project Site. The Project Site is entirely paved with asphalt and there is no existing body of water on the Project Site that would support riparian habitat. Therefore, no impact associated with riparian habitat would occur and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact: Wetlands and “waters of the U.S.” (WoUS), are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). WoUS include navigable coastal and inland waters; lakes, rivers, streams, and their tributaries; interstate waters and their tributaries; wetlands adjacent to such waters; intermittent streams; and other waters that could affect interstate commerce. The Project Site is a 5.25-acre parcel in an urbanized area of western Anaheim that is surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial development, including a railroad line to the east of the Project Site. The Project Site is entirely paved with asphalt and there is no existing body of water on the Project Site that would support federally protected wetlands. Therefore, no impacts associated with federally protected wetlands would occur and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact: The Project Site is located within an existing urbanized area consisting of residential and industrial developments. The most significant area near the Project Site that has the potential to serve as a wildlife corridor is the Santa Ana River, located approximately 3.5 miles east of the Project Site, which is considered a regional movement corridor for wildlife. The Project Site is a 5.25-acre parcel in an urbanized area of western Anaheim that is surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial development, including a railroad line to the east of the Project Site. The Project Site is entirely paved with asphalt and there is no existing vegetation or body of water on the Project Site that would support any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Therefore, no impact associated with the substantial interference with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with an established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor, or the use of native wildlife nursery sites would occur and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 74 e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact: The Project Site is a 5.25-acre parcel in an urbanized area of western Anaheim that is surrounded by residential, commercial and industrial development, including a railroad line to the east of the Project Site. The Project Site is entirely paved with asphalt and there are no existing biological resources on the Project Site that would be subject to any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Therefore, no impacts associated with biological resources resulting from conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or the City’s tree preservation policy would occur and no mitigation would be required. f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact: According to the City’s General Plan Green Element, the portion of the City generally south of SR-91 and east of SR-55 falls within the Orange County Central-Coast Sub-regional Natural Communities Conservation Plan (NCCP). The Project Site is not within the NCCP area.5 Therefore, no impacts associated with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan nor a Natural Community Conservation Plan, or any other approved conservation plan would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Biological Resources apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion There would be no impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Biological Resources and no mitigation would be required. 5 City of Anaheim Parcel Info, Zoning; see: https://gis.anaheim.net/PropertyInfo/?APN=25009111 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 75 4.5 Cultural Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5 and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (April 15, 2010)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment was completed to determine potential impacts to cultural resources associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix B – Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project Anaheim, California, VCS Environmental, April 2019, Revised March 2020). A Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report was completed to determine potential impacts to historical resources associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix C – Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report for 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County, CA, Daly & Associates, April 2019). Appendix B and C consist of cultural resources records searches and a historic era built environment evaluation of existing structures on the Project Site. Tribal consultation under SB18 is required because the project proposes a General Plan Amendment, and under AB52 as a CEQA project. More detailed information pertaining to SB18 and AB52 is in Section 4.19 – Tribal Cultural Resources. Environmental Analysis a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5 and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (April 15, 2010)? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site is currently developed with buildings used for auto sales and servicing, including an outdoor vehicle sales lot and parking. Appendix C details data used to discern the buildings and structures currently on the Project Site as developed in 1965. These built-environment resources are of sufficient age for them to be recorded on the Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series Site Recording Forms and evaluated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and/or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). The National Register and California Register historical significance criteria were utilized to evaluate the significance of the Project Site’s built- environment resources. In addition, a site visit and inspection were conducted on March 26, 2019. However, based on the criteria for listing in the National Register and California Register, the built-environment resources present on the Project Site do not meet the criteria for listing as a historical resource. Refer to Appendix C for detailed information on listing criteria. Further, the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 76 Project Site is not identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan. Therefore, substantial adverse impacts associated with a historical resource would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: On February 18, 2019, a records search and literature review were conducted through the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at the California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) for the Project Site. The SCCIC resources search failed to identify any cultural resources recorded within the Project Site boundaries. As no cultural resources were identified as a result of the records search and because of the total development of the Project Site, the presence of cultural resources in the subsurface is unlikely; however, because of the relative proximity to the Santa Ana River floodplain, there remains the potential for buried resources to be present. MM CUL-1 details that an archaeologist be on-call during project grading activities, prepared to examine and evaluate any discoveries. Therefore, potential impacts associated with archaeological resources would be less than significant with implementation of MM CUL-1. c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact: Due to the level of past disturbance in the project area, it is not anticipated that human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, would be encountered during earth removal or disturbance activities. However, in the unexpected event human remains are found, those remains would require proper treatment, in accordance with applicable laws. Procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains on non-federal lands have been mandated by California Health and Safety Code (CHSC) §7050.5, PRC §5097.98 and the California Code of Regulations (CCR) §15064.5(e). According to the provisions in CEQA, should human remains be encountered, all work in the immediate vicinity of the burial must cease, and any necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area must be taken. The Construction Contractor shall notify the County Coroner of the find immediately and no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98 (State of California 2006). If human remains are found during grading, all work in the immediate area (a radius of at least 100 feet) shall stop, and all parties shall follow all applicable state laws regarding human remains. If the remains are Native American, the coroner is responsible for contacting the NAHC within 24 hours. The NAHC, pursuant to Section 5097.98, shall immediately notify those persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the Project Site within 48 hours of being allowed access to the Project Site and shall recommend preservation in place, reburial, or the scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials. Therefore, potential impacts associated with human remains would be less than significant with compliance with existing regulations and procedures outlined in the CHSC and the CCR and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 77 Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1: Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall provide a note on plans indicating that in the event that any evidence of cultural resources is discovered during ground-disturbing activities, all work within the vicinity of the find shall stop until a qualified archaeological consultant can assess the find and make recommendations. Project Applicant shall not attempt excavation of potential cultural resources. The qualified archaeologist shall ensure that the Proposed Project complies with the following measures. • Prior to any ground disturbance, the qualified archaeologist, or their designee, shall provide a worker environmental awareness protection (WEAP) training to construction personnel regarding regulatory requirements for the protection of cultural (prehistoric and historic) resources. As part of this training, construction personnel shall receive proper procedures to follow if unanticipated cultural resources are discovered during construction. Workers will have contact information and protocols to follow in the event of any inadvertent discoveries. The WEAP training can be in the form of a video or PowerPoint presentation. Printed literature (handouts) can accompany the training and given to new workers and contractors to avoid continuous training over the course of the construction. • If unanticipated cultural material is encountered during any phase of project construction, all construction work within 50 feet (15 meters) of the find shall cease and the qualified archaeologist shall assess the find for importance. Construction activities may continue in other areas. If, in consultation with the City, the discovery is determined not to be important, work will be permitted to continue in the area. • If the qualified archaeologist determines a resource to constitute a “historical resource” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a “unique archaeological resource” pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the qualified archaeologist shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer and the City to develop a formal treatment plan. The plan should serve to reduce impacts to the resources and allow construction to proceed. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. • If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. • The Property Owner/Developer shall provide any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin for curation at a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the South-Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, the Property Owner/Developer shall donate the archaeological material to a local school 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 78 or historical society in the area for educational purposes, as determined to be appropriate by the City of Anaheim. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Cultural Resources would be less than significant with the incorporation of MM CUL-1. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 79 4.6 Energy Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ An Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to air quality associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix A - Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis, November 2019, Revised March 2020). The results of the analysis are based on CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. The Proposed Project would impact energy resources during construction and operation. Energy resources that would be potentially impacted include electricity, natural gas, and petroleum- based fuel supplies and distribution systems. This analysis includes a discussion of the potential energy impacts of the Proposed Project, with emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. A general definition of each of these energy resources are provided below. Electricity, a consumptive utility, is a man-made resource. The production of electricity requires the consumption or conversion of energy resources, including water, wind, oil, gas, coal, solar, geothermal, and nuclear resources, into energy. The delivery of electricity involves several system components, including substations and transformers that lower transmission line power (voltage) to a level appropriate for on-site distribution and use. The electricity generated is distributed through a network of transmission and distribution lines commonly called a power grid. Conveyance of electricity through transmission lines is typically responsive to market demands. Natural gas is a combustible mixture of simple hydrocarbon compounds (primarily methane) that is used as a fuel source. Natural gas consumed in California is obtained from naturally occurring reservoirs, mainly located outside the State, and delivered through high-pressure transmission pipelines. The natural gas transportation system is a nationwide network and, therefore, resource availability is typically not an issue. Natural gas satisfies almost one-third of the State’s total energy requirements and is used in electricity generation, space heating, cooking, water heating, industrial processes, and as a transportation fuel. Natural gas is measured in terms of cubic feet. Petroleum-based fuels currently account for a majority of the California’s transportation energy sources and primarily consist of diesel and gasoline types of fuels. However, the state has been working on developing strategies to reduce petroleum use. Over the last decade California has implemented several policies, rules, and regulations to improve vehicle efficiency, increase the development and use of alternative fuels, reduce air pollutants and GHG emissions from the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 80 transportation sector, and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Accordingly, petroleum-based fuel consumption in California has declined. Environmental Analysis a) Would the project result in a significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact: The following section calculates the potential energy consumption associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project and provides a determination if any energy utilized by the Proposed Project is wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Construction Energy The construction activities for the Proposed Project would include demolition of the existing auto-related commercial structures and pavement on the Project Site, grading of the Project Site, building construction of the proposed 381,525 square foot mixed use building and 239,072 square foot parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. The Proposed Project would consume energy resources during construction in three (3) general forms: i. Petroleum-based fuels used to power off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the Project Site, construction worker travel to and from the Project Site, as well as delivery and haul truck trips (e.g. hauling of demolition material to off-site reuse and disposal facilities); ii. Electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during Project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power; and, iii. Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Construction-Related Electricity During construction, the Proposed Project would consume electricity to construct the new structures and infrastructure. Electricity would be supplied to the Project Site by Anaheim Public Utilities and would be obtained from the existing electrical lines in the vicinity of the Project Site. The use of electricity from existing power lines rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered generators would minimize impacts on energy use. Electricity consumed during project construction would vary throughout the construction period based on the construction activities being performed. Various construction activities include electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. Such electricity demand would be temporary, nominal, and would cease upon the completion of construction. Overall, construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would require limited electricity consumption that would not be expected to have an adverse impact on available 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 81 electricity supplies and infrastructure. Therefore, the use of electricity during project construction would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Since the Project Site already has electrical service, it is anticipated that only nominal improvements would be required to Anaheim Public Utilities distribution lines and equipment with development of the Proposed Project. Where feasible, the new service installations and connections would be scheduled and implemented in a manner that would not result in electrical service interruptions to other properties. Compliance with City’s guidelines and requirements would ensure that the Proposed Project fulfills its responsibilities relative to infrastructure installation, coordinates any electrical infrastructure removals or relocations, and limits any impacts associated with demolition, grading, construction, and development. Construction of the Proposed Project’s electrical infrastructure is not anticipated to adversely affect the electrical infrastructure serving the surrounding uses or utility system capacity. Construction-Related Natural Gas Construction of the Proposed Project typically would not involve the consumption of natural gas. Natural gas would not be supplied to support construction activities, thus there would be no demand generated by construction. Since the Project Site is currently developed that currently has natural gas service to the Project Site, construction of the Proposed Project would be limited to installation of new natural gas connections within the Project Site. Development of the Proposed Project would likely not require extensive infrastructure improvements to serve the Project Site. Construction-related energy usage impacts associated with the installation of natural gas connections are expected to be confined to trenching in order to place the lines below surface. In addition, prior to ground disturbance, the Proposed Project would notify and coordinate with SoCalGas to identify the locations and depth of all existing gas lines and avoid disruption of gas service. Therefore, construction-related impacts to natural gas supply and infrastructure would be less than significant. Construction-Related Petroleum Fuel Use Petroleum-based fuel usage represents the highest amount of transportation energy potentially consumed during construction, which would utilized by both off-road equipment operating on the Project Site and on-road automobiles transporting workers to and from the Project Site and on-road trucks transporting equipment and supplies to the Project Site. The off-road construction equipment fuel usage was calculated through use of the off-road equipment assumptions and fuel use assumptions detailed in Section 7.3 (Appendix A), which found that the off-road equipment utilized during construction of the Proposed Project would consume 38,748 gallons of fuel. The on-road construction trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the construction vehicle trip assumptions and fuel use assumptions shown in Section 7.3 (Appendix A), which found that the on-road trips generated from construction of the Proposed Project would consume 62,680 gallons of fuel. As such, the combined fuel used from off-road construction equipment and on-road construction trips for the Proposed Project would result in the consumption of 101,428 gallons of petroleum fuel. This equates to 0.00053 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed in the State annually. As such, the construction-related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current petroleum usage rates. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 82 Construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would be required to adhere to all State and SCAQMD regulations for off-road equipment and on-road trucks, which provide minimum fuel efficiency standards. As such, construction activities for the Proposed Project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Impacts regarding transportation energy would be less than significant. Development of the Project would not result in the need to manufacture construction materials or create new building material facilities specifically to supply the Proposed Project. It is difficult to measure the energy used in the production of construction materials such as asphalt, steel, and concrete, it is reasonable to assume that the production of building materials such as concrete, steel, etc., would employ all reasonable energy conservation practices in the interest of minimizing the cost of doing business. Therefore, construction-related impacts associated with petroleum fuel use would be less than significant. Operational Energy The on-going operation of the of 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF of leasing office, 3,413 SF of retail space, and 639 space parking structure would require the use of energy resources for multiple purposes including, but not limited to, gas pumps, heating/ventilating/air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, lighting, appliances, and electronics. Energy would also be consumed during operations related to water usage, solid waste disposal, landscape equipment and vehicle trips. Operations-Related Electricity Operation of the Proposed Project would result in consumption of electricity at the Project Site. As detailed in Section 7.3 (Appendix A) the Proposed Project would consume 2,688,265 kilowatt- hours per year of electricity. This equates to 0.12 percent of the electricity consumed annually by Anaheim Public Utilities. As such, the operations-related electricity use would be nominal, when compared to current electricity usage rates in the City. The Proposed Project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of electricity, that includes CCR Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards. The CCR Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed buildings, including enhanced insulation, use of energy efficient lighting and appliances as well as requiring a variety of other energy-efficiency measures to be incorporated into all of the proposed structures. Therefore, it is anticipated the Proposed Project will be designed and built to minimize electricity use and that existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be enough to support the Proposed Project’s electricity demand. Therefore, potential impacts associated with electrical supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant. Operations-Related Natural Gas Operation of the Proposed Project would result in increased consumption of natural gas at the Project Site. As detailed in Section 7.3 (Appendix A) the Proposed Project would consume 3,476 MBTU per year of natural gas. This equates to 0.006 percent of the natural gas consumed annually in Orange County. As such, the operations-related natural gas use would be nominal, when compared to current natural gas usage rates in the County. The Proposed Project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of natural gas, 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 83 that includes CCR Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards. The CCR Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed structures, including enhanced insulation as well as use of efficient natural gas appliances and HVAC units. Therefore, it is anticipated the Proposed Project will be designed and built to minimize natural gas use and that existing and planned natural gas capacity and natural gas supplies would be enough to support the Proposed Project’s natural gas demand. Therefore, potential impacts associated with natural gas supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant. Operations-Related Vehicular Petroleum Fuel Usage Operation of the Proposed Project would result in increased consumption of petroleum-based fuels related to vehicular travel to and from the Project Site. As detailed in Section 7.3 (Appendix A) the Proposed Project would consume 40,305 gallons of petroleum fuel per year from vehicle travel. This equates to 0.00021 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed in the State annually. As such, the operations-related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current petroleum usage rates. The Proposed Project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of transportation energy that includes California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11 California Green Building Standards that require the Proposed Project to provide 19 parking spaces with electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces that are designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. Therefore, it is anticipated the Proposed Project will be designed and built to minimize transportation energy through the promotion of the use of clean air vehicles, including electric-powered vehicles and it is anticipated that existing and planned capacity and supplies of transportation fuels would be sufficient to support the Proposed Project’s demand. Therefore, potential impacts with regard transportation energy supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant. The Proposed Project would comply with regulatory compliance measures outlined by the State and City related to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), Transportation/Circulation, and Water Supply. The Proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable City Building and Fire Codes. The Proposed Project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. Therefore, potential impacts associated with wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The applicable energy plan for the Proposed Project is the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, adopted May 2004. The Proposed Project’s consistency with the energy conservation policies from the General Plan are shown in Table 13 - Proposed Project Compliance with the General Plan Energy Conservation Policies. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 84 Table 13 – Proposed Project Compliance with the General Plan Energy Conservation Policies General Plan Policy Proposed Project Implementation Actions Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and information provided on the City’s website. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable to City Staff for maintain the City’s website. Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling, effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). Consistent. The Proposed Project is designed to orient buildings to maximize exposure to cooling and the landscape plan has been designed to locate landscaping to shade structures. Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. Not Applicable. The Proposed Project consists of the demolition of the existing structures on the Project Site and construction of new buildings. No existing structures would remain onsite that could be retrofitted. Continue to provide free energy audits for the public. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable for the City as a service that the City provides. Source: City of Anaheim, 2004. As shown in Table 13, the Proposed Project would be consistent with all applicable energy conservation policies from the General Plan. The Proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Therefore, potential impacts associated with conflicts of a plan for renewable or energy efficient would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Energy Resources apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion There would be no impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Energy Resources and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 85 4.7 Geology and Soils Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iv. Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Section 1803.5.3 of the California Building Code (2016), creating substantial risks to life or property? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment was completed to determine potential impacts to cultural resources associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix B – Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project Anaheim, California, VCS Environmental, April 2019, Revised March 2020) A Geotechnical Due-Diligence Evaluation was completed to determine potential impacts to geology and soils associated with the development of the Proposed Project and includes response to comments to Anaheim City staff (Appendix D – Geotechnical Due-Diligence Evaluation, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., October 2018). An Infiltration Study was completed to determine potential impacts to geology and soils associated with development of the Proposed Project (Appendix E – Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., May 2018). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 86 Environmental Analysis a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Less Than Significant Impact: No known active faults are known to project through the Project Site nor does the Project Site lie within the boundaries of an “Earthquake Fault Zone” as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The closest known active fault if the Whittier Fault located 8.5 miles northeast of the Project Site. Therefore, the potential for ground rupture due to an earthquake beneath the Project Site is considered low. Although the Project Site is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone, it is in a seismically active area of Southern California. The type and magnitude of seismic hazards that may affect the Project Site are dependent on both the distance to causative faults and the intensity and duration of the seismic event. Although the probability of primary surface rupture is considered low, ground shaking hazards caused by earthquakes along regional active faults do exist and are accounted for in the design and construction of the proposed structures. The residential structures proposed for the Project Site would be constructed to the standards prescribed by the California Building Code (CBC), as amended by the City, which would reduce risks associated with seismic activity. Therefore, potential impacts associated with people or structures from a surface rupture would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in Section 4.6.1(a)(i), the Project Site is in a seismically active area of Southern California that has been affected by generally moderate to occasionally high levels of ground motion. Although the probability of primary surface rupture is considered low, ground shaking hazards caused by earthquakes along regional active faults are accounted for in the design and construction of the proposed structures. The Project Site lies within relative proximity to several active faults and would likely experience similar moderate to occasionally high levels of shaking from these faults as well as some background shaking from other seismically active parts of the Southern California region. The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with CBC requirements, as amended by the City, which would reduce risks associated with seismic activity. Therefore, potential impacts to people or structures from seismic ground shaking would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact: Appendix D for the Proposed Project evaluated the potential for seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, at the Project Site. Additionally, Appendix E concludes use of the proposed dry well system is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence, land sliding, or liquefaction. Engineering research of soil liquefaction potential (Youd, et al., 2001) indicates that generally three basic factors must 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 87 exist concurrently for liquefaction to occur. These factors include, 1) a source of ground shaking, such as an earthquake, capable of generating soil mass distortions; 2) a relatively loose silty and/or sandy soil; and 3) a relative shallow groundwater table (within approximately 50 feet below ground surface) or completely saturated soil conditions that will allow positive pore pressure generation. The liquefaction susceptibility of the on-site soils was evaluated by analyzing the potential concurrent occurrence of the above-mentioned three basic factors. The liquefaction evaluation for the site was completed under the guidance of Special Publication 117A: Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California (CDMG, 2008) and Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines (SCEC 1999). No groundwater was encountered during the investigation of the Project Site. Historical high groundwater has been documented at a depth greater than 50-feet in the vicinity of the site; therefore, the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is very low. Furthermore, the site is not located within a mapped California Geologic Survey liquefaction hazard zone. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer Proposed Project would be required to submit grading and foundation plans to the City for review to demonstrate compliance with the City’s grading requirements (AMC 17.04) as well as any applicable recommendations contained in Appendix E. The Proposed Project would be designed and constructed in accordance with CBC requirements, as amended by the City, which would reduce risks associated with liquefaction. Therefore, potential impacts to people or structures from liquefaction shaking would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. iv. Landslides? No Impact: Landslides result from the downward movement of earth or rock materials that have been influenced by gravity. In general, landslides occur due to various factors including steep slope conditions, erosion, rainfall, groundwater, adverse geologic structure, and grading impacts.6 According to Figure S-2 in the City’s General Plan Safety Element, the Project Site is not located in an area of known, possible, or conjectured landslide potential. Furthermore, as shown in Figure S-3 of the Safety Element, the Project Site is not located in an area with the potential for earthquake-induced landslides. There are no significant slopes located on or near the Project Site, and no significant slopes are proposed as part of the project design. Therefore, no impacts to people or structures from landslides would occur and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site currently consists of multiple buildings with an outdoor vehicle sales lot, and on-site parking for the existing auto sales and service uses. Construction activity associated with Proposed Project’s development may result in wind driven 6 http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2039/I-Safety-Element-?bidId= Page S-9, Accessed September 23, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 88 soil erosion and loss of topsoil due to grading activities. However, all construction and grading activities would comply with City’s grading ordinance (AMC Chapter 17.04) using BMPs, including the use of fiber rolls, and street sweeping. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would implement BMPs to control project runoff and protect water quality, which would limit operational impacts from the Proposed Project. Details on these BMPs are listed in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Appendix H. The Proposed Project would be designed in accordance with the BMPs outlined in Appendix H and those required pursuant to Chapter 17 of the AMC. Upon project completion, the Project Site would be developed with residential units, commercial and office space, paved surfaces, and landscaping, which would prevent substantial erosion from occurring. Therefore, potential impacts associated with soil erosion would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact: Seismically induced lateral spreading involves primarily lateral movement of earth materials due to ground shaking. For lateral spreading to occur, the liquefiable zone must be continuous, unconstrained laterally, and free to move along gently sloping ground toward an unconfined area. Lateral spreading results in near-vertical cracks with predominantly horizontal movement of the soil mass involved. A gentle slope in the ground face or the presence of a slope face nearby can cause the ground to slide or spread on layers of liquefied soil. The Project Site is generally flat, and no substantial slopes are present on-site. The Project Site is not located in an area of landslide potential, as shown in Figures S-2 and S-3 of the General Plan Safety Element. However, the results detailed in Appendix D indicated that in general, all existing artificial fills and the upper one to two feet of alluvium deposits are considered unsuitable in their existing condition to support proposed structural fills and site development. Based on the subsurface exploration, these materials range from two (2) to five (5) feet in thickness across the Project Site. These unsuitable materials would be removed and replaced with engineered compacted fill. Temporary slopes and trench excavations would be required for the construction of the subterranean level of the proposed parking structure and may impact remedial removals for the proposed adjacent mixed-use building. Should this occur, over-excavation requirements for the mixed-use building may need to be increased in order to limit the potential differential settlement between engineered fill and native soils. Further, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to adhere to the findings of Appendix D, the final grading plan per AMC 17.04, and the CBC. Therefore, potential impacts associated with unstable soils, lateral spreading, liquefaction, and collapse would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Section 1803.5.3 of the California Building Code (2016), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact: Based on laboratory test results outlined in Appendix D and the USCS visual manual classification, the near-surface soils within the Project Site are generally anticipated to possess a Very Low expansion potential, and no special design considerations are anticipated to mitigate expansive soils. Additional testing for soil expansion may be required 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 89 after rough grading and prior to construction of foundations and other concrete work to confirm these conditions. The Proposed Project would be constructed to the recommendations in Appendix D and to the standards prescribed by the CBC, as amended by the City. Therefore, potential impacts associated with expansive and corrosive soils would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact: The Project Site is served by a public sewer system. The Proposed Project would involve one connection to an existing 8” sewer line located within Loara Street and two connections to an existing 10” sewer line within Lincoln Avenue, as shown in Figure 22 – Conceptual Utilities Plan. The Proposed Project would not include the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no impacts associated with soils incapable of disposing wastewater would occur and no mitigation would be required. f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: On January 24, 2019, a paleontological records search was completed by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) for the Project Site, which revealed that paleontologically sensitive older Quaternary alluvium lies at what could be relatively shallow depth below younger Quaternary Alluvium at the surface. Excavations into the deeper, finer-grained older Quaternary Alluvium may encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Therefore, MM GEO-1 would require these deeper excavations be monitored by a qualified paleontologist to identify and recover any significant fossil remains. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. Therefore, with implementation of MM GEO-1 for paleontological monitoring of excavation activities three feet or greater below ground surface, potential impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures MM GEO-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall retain a qualified paleontologist to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The paleontologist shall attend the pre-grading conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 90 Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Geology and Soils would be less than significant with incorporation of MM GEO-1. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 91 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ An Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to air quality associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix A - Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis, November 2019, Revised March 2020). The results of the analysis are based on CalEEMod version 2016.3.2. Environmental Analysis a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The Proposed Project would consist of development of 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF of leasing office, 3,413 square feet of retail space, and 636 space parking structure. The Proposed Project would generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The City of Anaheim has adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, July 2015, that includes measures for new development within the City to implement in order to meet the State’s 2030 GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 baseline levels. In order to show consistency with the GHG Reduction Plan, quantification of the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions is not required. The Proposed Project’s GHG emissions are shown in Table 14 - Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions and have been provided for informational purposes only. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 92 Table 14 – Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Category CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Area Sources1 6.28 0.01 0.00 6.42 Energy Usage2 1,085.08 0.02 0.01 1,087.66 Mobile Sources3 1,100.88 0.04 0.00 1,101.77 Solid Waste4 15.07 0.89 0.00 37.34 Water and Wastewater5 126.39 0.54 0.01 143.94 Construction6 31.26 0.00 0.00 31.35 Total GHG Emissions 2,364.95 1.50 0.02 2,408.47 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance 3,000 Notes: 1 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, hearths, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4 Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6 Construction emissions amortized over 30 years as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group on November 19, 2009. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Table 14 shows that the Proposed Project would create 2,408.47 MTCO2e per year, which is below SCAQMD’s draft threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. As detailed in Section 4.8.1(b), the Proposed Project would be consistent with the applicable measures in the City’s GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, potential impacts associated the generation of greenhouse gas emissions would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Anaheim Public Utilities adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), July 2015. The GHG Reduction Plan was prepared to assist the City’s power supplies in conforming to the GHG emissions reductions as mandated under AB 32. The GHG Reduction Plan provides utilities GHG emission reduction targets of 20 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020 and a 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The Plan provides reduction targets for energy usage, photovoltaic (PV) rooftop installations, and use of electric vehicles. For energy usage, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of a 15 percent reduction by 2020 and a 30 percent reduction by 2030 of the energy utilized by homes in Anaheim. This target will be met through application of State regulations including CCR Title 24, Part 6. The 2019 Title 24 Building Standards became effective on January 1, 2020 and will be required to be met for the Proposed Project’s structures. Homes built with the 2019 Standards will use about 7 percent less energy than the current 2016 Standards. The 2016 Title 24 Standards included new energy- efficiency requirements that resulted in new homes being 15 percent more efficient than the 2013 Title 24 Part 6 Standards that were in effect at the time of the preparation of the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the Proposed Project would meet the energy use reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 93 For PV rooftop installations, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 27,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2020 and 37,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2030. This target will be met through application of State regulations including Title 24, Part 6. The 2019 Title 24 Building Standards require that new high-rise residential structures, such as the Proposed Project are constructed to be solar ready to facilitate the installation of rooftop solar systems. This requirement is typically met through structural design to ensure that rooftops are designed to handle the weight of PV systems and through installation of electrical conduit from the main circuit panel area to the roof. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the Proposed Project would meet the PV rooftop installation targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. For electric vehicles, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 2,000 low or zero emission vehicles by 2020 and 5,000 low or zero emission vehicles by 2030. As detailed on the site plan for the Proposed Project (Figure 3), 19 parking spaces would have electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces would be designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. Therefore, development of the Proposed Project would assist the City in meeting the electric vehicle usage targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. Development of the Proposed Project would meet the targets outlined in the GHG Reduction Plan. The Proposed Project would comply with the GHG Reduction Plan reduction targets and would not conflict with the applicable plan for reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, potential impacts associated with conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Greenhouse Gas Emissions apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Greenhouse Gas Emissions would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 94 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ h) Include a new or retrofitted stormwater treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g., water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands, etc.), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g., increased vectors and noxious odors)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was completed to determine potential impacts to hazards and hazardous materials associated with the development of the Project Site. (Appendix F – Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., April 2017). A Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report was completed to identify the locations of on-site underground storage tanks (USTs), former tankholds, clarifiers, and/or other associated features and to investigate the potential impacts from hazardous chemicals to the soil from the existing on-site automotive service uses. (Appendix G – Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., July 2017). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 95 A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan was completed to determine applicable stormwater treatment. (Appendix H – Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., September 2019) The Phase I ESA (Appendix F) revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions and an environmental issue in connection with the Project Site. According to the available historical documentation, the Project Site was developed with the current structures and associated subsurface features by 1966 for automotive maintenance service, repair, auto body, and sales. A site assessment was conducted on April 17, 2017, where the following features capable of impacting the subsurface were observed: approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts; a compressor room with staining surrounding a floor drain; a former hazardous waste storage room (currently maintenance storage room) with stained concrete foundation surrounding a floor drain, which is reportedly connected to a two-stage clarifier; automotive washing and detailing with two active floor drains reportedly connected to a single-stage clarifier; recreational vehicle washing with associated floor drains connected to a four-stage clarifier; prefabricated spray paint booths; storage of waste paints within 30-gallon drums (without secondary containment); and one recreational vehicle sanitary waste dump station which is reportedly connected to the sewer system. Based on age, polychlorinated Biphenyl’s (PCB’s) were likely used in the past in dielectric fluids and oils in a variety of equipment, including hydraulic-lifting equipment. Additionally, due to the age of the existing buildings on the Project Site, there is a potential for asbestos-containing material (ACM) and/or lead-based paint (LBP) to be present. Additionally, the Project Site is listed as an Underground Storage Tank (UST) facility and Historical UST site with nine (9) USTs. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) database identified the following USTs for the Project Site: one (1) 1,000-gallon UST for unleaded fuel; one (1) transmission oil tank; two (2) motor oil tanks; three (3) waste oil tanks; and two (2) steam cleaning runoff sumps. As a result of the Project Site’s designation as a Historical UST site, a Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report (Appendix G) was completed. In addition to the recorded nine USTs, a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) case dated December 5, 1989 was listed as “closed” on the SWRCB database. The confirmatory soil data in the USE removal report for the closed LUST case indicated the contamination did not remain once the UST, dispenser and piping were removed. The tank construction material, location, installation and/or removal dates, and tank capacities of the eight remaining USTs were not reported due to operations of the existing uses occurring at a time of little-to-no regulatory oversight (1966). The Phase II investigation includes the results of a geophysical survey, conducted July 17, 2017, and evaluation of four borings of soil samples (B1 and B7 through B9). The purpose of the geophysical survey was to identify clarifiers, USTs remaining in place and/or backfilled tankholds and clear boring locations of utilities. The geophysical survey identified seven (7) backfilled excavations throughout the Project Site, which coincide with the UST locations from the UST removal permit and the Phase I ESA (Appendix F); refer to Figure 3 in Appendix G for these locations. None of the analyzed soil samples contained detectable concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-cc) or polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) above the laboratory practical quantification limits (PQLs). Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were detected in two of the analyzed soil samples (B1-5 and B7-5) at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 96 The remaining VOCs were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQL. Maximum Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) are concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons that can remain in soil without potentially degrading the quality of groundwater underlying a site. Maximum SSLs are established and enforced by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). Department of Toxic Substances Control Attenuation Factor and Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) are generic, risk-based chemical concentrations developed by the EPA Region 9 for use in initial screening-level evaluations. RSLs combine human health toxicity values with standard exposure factors to estimate contaminant concentrations that are considered to be health protective of human exposures over a lifetime through direct-contact exposure pathways (e.g., via inhalation and/or ingestion of and/or dermal contact with impacted soil and/or indoor air). RSLs are not legally enforceable standards, but rather are considered guidelines to evaluate if potential risks associated with encountered chemical impacts may warrant further evaluation. The DTSC Office of Human and Ecological Risk (HERO) developed California-Modified RSLs based on a review of 1) the differences in methodology between PRGs and RSLs 2) RSL concentrations, and 3) recent toxicity values. As detailed in Appendix G, no analyzed soil samples contained concentrations of TPH-cc or PCBs above laboratory PQLs and the PQLs did not exceed the Maximum Soil Screening Levels or Regional Screening Levels. The detected concentrations of benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene in samples B1-5 and B7-5 were below the residential and commercial/industrial RSLs. No other VOCs were detected above laboratory PQLs and the PQLs did not exceed residential or commercial/industrial RSLs. There appears to be a de minimis release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface in the vicinity of the two older clarifiers; however, there does not appear to be a concern to human health or the environment. The Phase I ESA and Phase II Investigation conclude that prior to demolition, a demolition level asbestos survey and abatement are to be performed if required by reviewing agencies. Additionally, as a part of the Proposed Project, subgrade features should be removed according to state and/or local regulations upon redevelopment of the Project Site. Environmental Analysis a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site is currently used for auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. The Phase I ESA found evidence of potential ACM and LBP presence on-site in the existing buildings. State-level agencies, in conjunction with the EPA and OSHA, regulate removal, abatement, and transport procedures for ACMs. Releases of asbestos from industrial, demolition, or construction activities are prohibited by these regulations, and medical evaluation and monitoring are required for employees performing activities that could expose them to asbestos. Additionally, the regulations include warnings and practices to reduce risks of asbestos emissions and exposure. Finally, federal, state, and local agencies must be notified prior to the onset of demolition or construction activities with the potential to release asbestos. Similar regulations are also required for LBP during demolition and renovations activities. These regulations include 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 97 the California Code of Regulations (Title 8, Section 1529); California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1529 [Asbestos] and Section 1532.1 [Lead]); Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, Part 61 [asbestos], Title 40, Part 763 [asbestos] and Title 29, Part 1926 [asbestos and lead]); California Health and Safety Code (Section 39650 et seq.); and South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities). Therefore, compliance with existing regulations associated with potential impacts from ACMs and LBPs would be less than significant and no mitigation measures related to ACMs and LBPs would be required. The Phase I ESA (Appendix F) included a search for regulatory records associated with the Project Site and identified a LUST case dated December 1989, which has subsequently been closed. The Phase I ESA also found evidence of potential existing USTs and concluded a Phase II Investigation should be conducted. A Phase II Subsurface Investigation (Appendix G) was conducted and found that in 1989, a Facility Modification Application on file with the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency was completed by Mills Ford to remove one UST with six USTs to remain in place. No additional records for tank removal were available for the Project Site with the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency, and the Anaheim Fire Department did not identify the Project Site as an active UST facility. Partner supervised a geophysical survey to identify clarifiers, USTs remaining in place and/or backfilled tankholds and clear boring locations of utilities. The geophysical survey concluded that seven backfilled excavations located throughout the Project Site coincided with the UST locations from the UST removal permits and no additional excavations were identified. No metallic signatures were identified in any of the backfilled excavations, which indicates that the UST have been removed. In the event any unknown USTs are located on the Project Site, the subgrade features should be removed according to state and/or local regulations including California Fire Code, 2007 Edition; California Health & Safety Code, Chapter 6.7; California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16.. The City of Anaheim, in conjunction with oversight from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), maintains specification and requirements for the removal of USTs.7 A permit through the Anaheim Fire Department would be required prior to the start of UST removal activities to ensure public health and welfare. Further, during the demolition and construction phases of the Proposed Project, the transport of demolition and construction waste for disposal could result in accidental release of hazardous materials. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste to reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit. The disposal of all demolition waste would be conducted in accordance with current regulations. Operation of the Proposed Project would not involve the transport, use, or disposal of large quantities of hazardous materials. The use of hazardous materials on the Project Site post- 7 http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1371/UST-Removal-Guidelines?bidId= Accessed September 24, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 98 construction would consist of those commonly used in a residential and retail commercial setting for routine maintenance and cleaning. Proper handling of the use and disposal of hazardous materials would reduce the potential for exposure. Therefore, potential impacts to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Section 4.9.1(a), the Property Owner/Developer would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste during the construction phase to reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit. Additionally, removal of any unknown USTs from the Project Site would be subject to all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to their removal. Proper handling of the use and disposal of hazardous materials associated with residential and retail commercial uses would reduce the potential for exposure. Operation of the Proposed Project would not involve the transport, use, or disposal of large quantities of hazardous materials. The use of hazardous materials on the Project Site post-construction would consist of those commonly used in a residential setting for routine maintenance and cleaning. Proper handling of the use and disposal of hazardous materials would reduce the potential for exposure. Therefore, potential impacts to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. Loara Elementary School and Fairmont Private School are located within a quarter mile of the Proposed Project. Loara Elementary School is located directly south adjacent of the Project Site and Fairmont Private School is located approximately 300 feet to the southeast of the Project Site. As stated in Section 4.9.1(a) and (b), the Property Owner/Developer would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to the transport, use, disposal, handling, and storage of hazardous waste during the construction phase to reduce the likelihood and severity of accidents during transit, including obtaining the required ACM survey from SCAQMD and UST removal permit from the City. Both required standards would be subject to review and regulation by each applicable jurisdiction. Further, proper handling of the use and disposal of hazardous materials associated with residential and retail commercial uses would reduce the potential for exposure of any school in proximity to the Project Site to hazardous materials. Therefore, potential impacts associated with an existing or proposed school within one-quarter mile of the Project Site through emission of hazardous emissions or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 99 d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less Than Significant Impact: Based on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor Site/Facility Search3F3F 8, the Project Site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. However, the Phase I ESA identified that a Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) case dated December 5, 1989 which reportedly impacted soils was listed on the GeoTracker database. The LUST was identified as a closed case cleanup site on the GeoTracker database dated June 20, 1990. The information indicates that this was a soil only case. Operation of the Proposed Project would not result in the use or storage of large quantities of hazardous materials, Therefore, no impacts associated with hazardous materials sites to the public or the environment would occur, and no mitigation would be required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact: The Proposed Project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or public use airport.9 The closest public use airports are John Wayne Airport located 10 miles to the south, and Fullerton Municipal Airport located over three miles to the northwest. The Proposed Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area because of its proximity to a public airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with public use airports would occur and no mitigation would be required. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact: The Proposed Project would not substantially change the way emergency access is provided to the Project Site via West Lincoln Avenue or Loara Street. The closest emergency services facility is Fire Station no. 2 located approximately 1.1 miles northwest of the Project Site on Crescent Avenue, just west of I-5. The proposed on-site accessways meet the turning radii and street width requirements of the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department as shown on Figure 23 – Conceptual Fire Access Plan. The Proposed Project includes design features such as fire separation walls, areas of enhance fire protection, in addition to required 150-foot hose pulls. These standards would ensure adequate access within the Project Site for emergency response or evacuation plan. In addition, as part of the plan check process, the Project Site plan would undergo a fire, life, and safety review by the Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department (AFR) and Anaheim Police Department (APD) to ensure adequate infrastructure for emergency response 8 https://calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/ Accessed September 24, 2019 9 Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County Airport Planning Areas, certified 7/21/05; see: http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/airportlu.pdf 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 100 and access. Therefore, no impacts associated with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would occur and no mitigation would be required. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site is in a highly urbanized area and is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to Figure S-5, Fire Protection Areas in the City’s General Plan Safety Element. As part of the plan check process, the Project Site plan would undergo a fire, life, and safety review by the AFR and would be required to comply with all fire regulations applicable to the project area. Therefore, potential impacts associated with wildland fires would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. h) Would the project include a new or retrofitted stormwater treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g., water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetlands, etc.), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g., increased vectors and noxious odors)? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project involves the construction of a mixed-use development with residential and retail commercial uses on the Project Site which would introduce landscaped pervious areas typical of this type of development. Under existing conditions, runoff from the northern half of the Project Site flows in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue and then continues in a westerly direction along the street. Flows from the southern half of the site drain in a southerly direction towards Pampas Lane and continue in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue along Euclid Street. All flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street, and discharge out to Carbon Canyon Creek via public storm drain lines. The Proposed Project would maintain existing drainage patterns and runoff would generally drain towards the perimeter of the Project Site. High flows would bypass the detention system and sheet flow to the adjacent roadways, like existing conditions. BMP for site water quality treatment would be comprised of new on-site storm drain facilities which would collect low flows and convey them to one of three detention systems. From the detention systems, runoff would flow into one of three adjacent drywells that would infiltrate runoff back into the site. Infiltration BMPs would be utilized for retaining the design capture volume on-site. The proposed street widening on Lincoln Avenue and the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street would be treated pursuant to EPA Green Street Standards using a Bioclean Modular Wetlands System or equivalent. Final street widening footprint, treatment volume, and BMP sizing would be provided as part of the Final WQMP. Appendix H states the most important part of all drywell systems is the incorporation of proper upstream pre - treatment to remove solids and fines from entering the final infiltration chamber. The MaxWell IV drywell system itself includes a pretreatment settling chamber and slotted inlet to provide treatment prior to entering the infiltration chamber. However, in order to provide additional pre- treatment and filtration of runoff prior to infiltrating, the detention systems would include upstream pre-treatment devices (Contech StormFilter or equivalent). The Stormfilter unit has been certified for effectiveness as an enhanced pretreatment device by the Washington Department of Ecology Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology (TAPE) program, and all devices would be designed and constructed according to City standards. Therefore, potential 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 101 impacts associated with environmental effects of a new or retrofitted stormwater treatment control BMP would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Hazards and Hazardous Materials apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Hazards and Hazardous Materials would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 102 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ii. substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or offsite; ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iii. create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of runoff; or ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan was completed to determine potential impacts associated with water quality (PWQMP) (Appendix H – Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., September 2019). A Preliminary Hydrology Report was completed to determine potential impacts associated with hydrology (Appendix I – Preliminary Hydrology Report, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., July 2019). An Infiltration Study was completed to determine potential impacts to geology and soils associated with development of the Proposed Project (Appendix E – Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., May 2018). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 103 Environmental Analysis a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Less Than Significant Impact: Construction of the Proposed Project would include grading, excavation, and other earthmoving activities that have the potential to cause erosion that would subsequently degrade water quality and/or violate water quality standards. As required by the Clean Water Act, the Property Owner/Developer must comply with the Santa Ana Municipal Separate Storm Sewer (MS4) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, which is administered in the project area by the City of Anaheim and County of Orange and is issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), regulates storm water and urban runoff discharges from developments to natural and constructed storm drain systems in the City of Anaheim. Since the Proposed Project would disturb one or more acres of soil, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activities subject to the Construction General Permit include clearing, grading, and disturbances such as stockpiling or excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the Project Site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP must also include BMPs designed to protect against storm water runoff; a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants should the BMPs fail; and a sediment monitoring plan, should the Project Site discharge directly into a water body listed on the 303(d) list for sediment. The Project Site is within the San Gabriel River/Coyote Creek Watershed, which covers 689 square miles, 85.5 square miles of which are in Orange County, including most of the western portion of Anaheim. Drainage on the northern half of the Project Site currently flows in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue and then continues in a westerly direction along the street. Drainage on the southern half of the Project Site currently flows in a southerly direction towards Pampas Lane and continues in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue along Euclid Street. All flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street. Under the operating condition, the Project Site drainage would be similar except that on-site drainage would be collected and conveyed to three drywells for water quality purposes using a low flow subdrain system. Appendix E details groundwater depths of over 100-feet and is anticipated to remain below a depth of 50-feet during the life of the project. Section A of the Construction General Permit describes the elements that must be contained in the SWPPP. Therefore, with incorporation of these policies and requirements, potential impacts associated with water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 104 b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Anaheim receives water from two main sources: The Orange County Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) and imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Groundwater is pumped from 18 active wells within the City, and imported water is delivered through seven treated water connections and one untreated connection. According to the City of Anaheim 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)10, local groundwater has been the least expensive and most reliable source of water supply for the City. The City depends heavily on the groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin each year. The City of Anaheim General Plan identifies an average household size of 3.4 persons. The Proposed Project would include the construction of 315 new residential units and generate approximately 1,071 new residents, which would increase water demand. Based on the City’s 2015 UWMP 11 , the estimated water demand for 2020 is 62,050 acre-feet per year (afy) or approximately 151 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). An estimated 1,071 new residents would result in a water demand of approximately 161,721 Gallons Per Day (GPD) or 181 afy. Under normal conditions, the 2015 UWMP predicts total potable and raw water demand of 61,895 afy in 2020, and 66,910 afy in 2030. Of the total projected water supply of 62,050 afy in 2020 and 67,065 afy in 2030 under normal year conditions, 43,435 afy in 2020 and 46,946 afy in 2030 are estimated to be groundwater. The estimated water demand for the Proposed Project is 181 afy, which is nominal compared to the projected supply. The City would have enough water supply to service the Proposed Project. The Project Site is not an identified groundwater recharge facility 12 . Development of the Proposed Project would not interfere with groundwater recharge through the development of impervious areas on the Project Site. The existing Project Site is 95 percent of impervious area. Development of the Proposed Project would reduce the impervious surface to approximately 85 percent of the Project Site. Aside from the mixed-use structures, concrete driveways, asphalt streets, and concrete walkways, the remainder of the Project Site would consist of landscaping and other pervious materials. The total area of open space and common area landscaping would be approximately 35,001 SF. Therefore, potential impacts associated with groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 10 City of Anaheim 2015 Urban Water Management Plan http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/11777/Anaheim-UWMP-2016?bidId= Accessed September 25, 2019 11 Per City Staff, 1 AF = 325,851 gallons 2020 Water demand: 62,050 AF/year * 325,851 gallons = 20,219,054,550 gallons 20,219,054,550 gallons / 365 days: = 55,394,670 GPD 55,394,670 GPD / 2020 population: 366,938 = ~151 GPCD 151 GPCD * 1,071 residents = 161,721 GPCD161,721 GPCD x 365 days/year = 59,028,165 gallons annual demand 59,028,165 / 325,851 = 181 afy 12 https://www.ocwd.com/media/6750/surfacewaterrechargefacilities.pdf Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 105 c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact: Grading activities during construction of the Proposed Project may result in wind driven soil erosion and loss of topsoil. However, all construction and grading activities would comply with City’s grading ordinance using BMPs, including the use of fiber rolls, street sweeping, sandbag barriers, straw bale barriers, and storm drain inlet protection. Upon project completion, the Project Site would be developed with a mixed-use development consisting of residential rental units, retail commercial, paved surfaces, and landscaping, which would prevent substantial erosion from occurring. Therefore, potential impacts from erosion would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in Section 4.10.1(a), the Proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site. The Proposed Project would not involve an alteration of the course of a stream or river. Appendix I concludes the post- construction drainage pattern would remain the same as the preconstruction drainage pattern, and on-site runoff would not exceed that of the existing condition. The proposed drywells and low flow subdrain system would be designed to temporarily store and infiltrate runoff, primarily from rooftops and another impervious area. The drywells would be used to treat stormwater runoff for water quality purposes. The Proposed Project would not increase the runoff from the site as the existing site is 95 percent impervious while Proposed Project includes a landscape area of more than 35,000 SF. Therefore, this development would not have a negative impact on downstream facilities. The proposed drywells and low flow subdrain system on the Project Site would retain and treat project run-off, therefore reducing flow rates from the pre-development condition. Therefore, potential impacts associated with on or off-site flooding due to an altered drainage pattern would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in Section 4.10.1(a), the Proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site, and would result in decreased flow rates from the existing condition due to the reduction in impervious surfaces from 95 percent to 85 percent of the Project Site. The drywells and low flow subdrain system would be designed to temporarily store and infiltrate runoff, primarily from rooftops and other impervious area. The drywells would be used to treat stormwater runoff for water quality purposes. Non- structural BMPs such as activity restrictions, street sweeping, and common area landscape maintenance and litter control would also contribute towards runoff control and water quality 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 106 protection. In addition, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to comply with the NPDES permit requirements to reduce any potential water quality impacts. The reduced discharges from Project Site post-development would effectively improve the drainage characteristics of the Project Site and drainage would follow existing conditions. Therefore, potential impacts from runoff that would exceed the capacity of the drainage systems or provide additional sources of polluted runoff would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. d) In flood, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? No Impact: Seismic seiches are standing waves set up on rivers, reservoirs, ponds, and lakes when seismic waves from an earthquake pass through the area. They are in direct contrast to tsunamis which are giant sea waves created by the sudden uplift of the sea floor.13 The Project Site is surrounded by a relatively flat and urbanized area and not adjacent to any enclosed body of water, such as a lake or reservoir. Further, the Project Site is located approximately 10 miles from the Pacific Ocean and would not likely be impacted by a tsunami. The surrounding topography of the Project Site is generally flat and would not be subject to inundation by mudflow. Therefore, no impacts related to seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would occur, and no mitigation would be required. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would preserve the existing drainage pattern for the Project Site. Drainage on the northern half of the Project Site currently flows in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue and then continues in a westerly direction along the street. Drainage on the southern half of the Project Site currently flows in a southerly direction towards Pampas Lane and continues in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue along Euclid Street. All flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street. Under the operating condition, the Project Site drainage would be similar except that on- site drainage would be collected and conveyed to three drywells for water quality purposes using a low flow subdrain system. High flows would be diverted from the detention system and sheet flow to adjacent roadways, like existing conditions. Infiltration BMPs would be utilized for retaining the design capture volume on-site. The proposed street widening on Lincoln Avenue and the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street would be treated pursuant to EPA Green Street Standards using a Bioclean Modular Wetlands System or equivalent. Final street widening footprint, treatment volume, and BMP sizing would be provided as part of the Final WQMP. Appendix H states the most important part of all drywell systems is the incorporation of proper upstream pre - treatment to remove solids and fines from entering the final infiltration chamber. The MaxWell IV drywell system itself includes a pretreatment settling chamber and slotted inlet to provide treatment prior to entering the 13 https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/seiche.php 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 107 infiltration chamber. However, in order to provide additional pre-treatment and filtration of runoff prior to infiltrating, the detention systems would include upstream pre-treatment devices (Contech StormFilter or equivalent). The Stormfilter unit has been certified for effectiveness as an enhanced pretreatment device by the Washington Department of Ecology Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology (TAPE) program, and all devices would be designed and constructed according to City standards. Development of the Proposed Project would not significantly alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site or alter the course of a stream or river. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements would reduce potential impacts from erosion and siltation during the Project Site’s preparation and earthmoving phases to less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Hydrology and Water Quality apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Hydrology and Water Quality would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 108 4.11 Land Use and Planning Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project physically divide an established community? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would add 315 residential units and 3,414 SF of retail commercial to an already urbanized area that is adjacent to existing multi-family residential development and other commercial uses. The Project Site is located on the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, which is on the northeastern edge of a predominantly residentially zones area and located approximately 650-feet east of the I-5 freeway which bisects the City. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not physically divide an established community and impacts associated with physically dividing an established community would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact: The Applicant proposes to amend the General Plan to change the land use designation of the Project Site from General Commercial to Mixed-use High and reclassify the zone to apply the Mixed-Use Overlay to the existing General Commercial base zone in order to construct the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project supports the following policies of the City’s General Plan Land Use Element: Goal 1.1: Preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s mosaic of unique neighborhoods: Policy 1. Actively pursue development standards and design policies to preserve and enhance the quality and character of Anaheim’s many neighborhoods. Policy 2. Ensure that new development is designed in a manner that preserves the quality of life in existing neighborhoods. Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs: Policy 1. Facilitate new residential development on vacant or underutilized infill parcels. Policy 6. Ensure quality development through appropriate development standards and by adherence to related Community Design Element policies and guidelines. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 109 Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses: Policy 2. Promote compatible development through adherence to Community Design Element policies and guidelines. Policy 3. Ensure that developers consider and address project impacts upon surrounding neighborhoods during the design and development process. The Proposed Project would construct new housing on an underutilized infill parcels, which would help address the City’s housing needs. According to the General Plan EIR, the City is nearing its buildout potential8F8F 14 The projected population at buildout is 389,417 according to the 2019 Orange County Progress Report prepared by the Center for Demographic Research at California State University Fullerton, which represents a 18% increase over the 2000 population of 328,0149F9F 15 The Recommended Land Use Alternative contained in the General Plan EIR provides for 126,570 dwelling units and 260,335 jobs, making the City job-rich, further increasing the jobs- housing imbalance. Identifying additional housing opportunities in the City is consistent with SCAG’s strategy to increase housing opportunities in job-rich areas. Development of the Proposed Project would require a General Plan Amendment from General Commercial to Mixed-Use High, and a Reclassification to apply the Mixed-Use Overlay to the existing General Commercial base zone. The intent for the Mixed-Use designation is to function differently from the typical patterns of individual, segregated land uses. Uses and activities are designed together in an integrated fashion to create a dynamic urban environment that serves as the center of activity for the surrounding area. The designation provides opportunities for an integrated mix of residential, retail, service, entertainment and office opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment. The Mixed-Use Overlay implemented together with the General Commercial Zone, allows for the construction of a mixed-use development through the Conditional Use Permit process. Structured parking is an essential component in most-mixed- use developments and the Proposed Project would include a six-level parking structure located in the center of the development, shielding it from view. The Proposed Project is consistent with the density for the Mixed-Use High designation, which allows up to 60 dwelling units/acre. The Proposed Project’s density and design is consistent with and implements the Mixed-Use High General Plan Designation and the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone. Upon the approval of the requested General Plan Amendment and Reclassification, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the adjacent residential and commercial land uses and with the 14 Buildout Statistical Summary Table 5.12-5; see: 5.12 Population and Housing http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2194; Buildout Statistical Summary of the Recommended Alternative Table 5.8-3; see: 5.8 Land Use and Relevant Planning, Accessed September 10, 2019 http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2190 15 Center for Demographic Research, California State University Fullerton. Orange County Jurisdiction Demographics: Anaheim; http://www.fullerton.edu/cdr/_resources/pdf/progressreport/Anaheim.pdf Accessed September 10, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 110 development pattern of the surrounding area. Moreover, the GPA would facilitate the replacement of a less compatible auto-related uses with a mixed-use development with residential and retail. The Proposed Project would construct 315 residential units on 5.25 gross acres at a density of 60 units per gross acre. The proposed density is consistent with the permitted density range under the Mixed-Use High designation. Therefore, potential impacts associated with compliance with the General Plan Land Use Element and Zoning requirements would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Land Use and Planning apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Land Use and Planning would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 111 4.12 Mineral Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact: According to the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element,11F11F 16 the Project Site is not designated as a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area Urbanized or Urbanizing, nor within the MRZ-2 Mineral Resource Zone Aggregate Resources Only Area by the California Geological Survey. Therefore, no impacts associated with any known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state would occur and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact: As discussed in Section 4.11(a), the Project Site is not located within a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area Urbanized or Urbanizing, nor within an MRZ-2 Mineral Resource Zone Aggregate Resources Only area. Therefore, no impacts associated with the availability of any locally important mineral resource recovery sites would occur and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Mineral Resources apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Mineral Resources would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 16 Figure G-3, City of Anaheim General Plan Program Mineral Resources Map, 1995. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 112 4.13 Noise Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Noise Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to noise associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix J – Noise Impact Analysis 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, City of Anaheim, Vista Environmental, January 2020, Revised March 2020). The Proposed Project will be required to comply with the following regulatory conditions from the City of Anaheim and State of California (State). AMC Section 6.70.010 Sound Pressure Levels AMC Section 6.70.010 restricts noise levels to 60 dBA at any point on the property line. Section 6.70.010 exempts construction noise that occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from the 60 dBA stationary noise standard. Compliance with this regulation will reduce the construction- related and operational-related noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors. AMC Section 18.40.090 Sound Attenuation for Residential Developments AMC Section 18.40.090 requires that residential developments that are constructed within 600 feet of any railroad, freeway or arterial roadway be analyzed to determine if the noise levels would exceed 65 dBA CNEL within common recreation areas or 45 dBA CNEL at the interior of the proposed residential apartments. Compliance with this regulation will reduce operational noise impacts to the future residents of the proposed residential apartments. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 113 California Department of Health Services Office of Noise Control Established in 1973, the California Department of Health Services Office of Noise Control (ONC) was instrumental in developing regularity tools to control and abate noise for use by local agencies. One significant model is the “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Matrix,” which allows the local jurisdiction to clearly delineate compatibility of sensitive uses with various incremental levels of noise. California Noise Insulation Standards Title 24, Chapter 1, Article 4 of the California Administrative Code (California Noise Insulation Standards) requires noise insulation in new hotels, motels, apartment houses, and dwellings (other than single-family detached housing) that provides an annual average noise level of no more than 45 dBA CNEL. When such structures are located within a 60-dBA CNEL (or greater) noise contour, an acoustical analysis is required to ensure that interior levels do not exceed the 45-dBA CNEL annual threshold. In addition, Title 21, Chapter 6, Article 1 of the California Administrative Code requires that all habitable rooms, hospitals, convalescent homes, and places of worship shall have an interior CNEL of 45 dB or less due to aircraft noise. Government Code Section 65302 Government Code Section 65302 mandates that the legislative body of each county and city in California adopt a noise element as part of its comprehensive general plan. The local noise element must recognize the land use compatibility guidelines published by the State Department of Health Services. The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable. Project Design Features The analysis of Appendix J is based on implementation of the following project design features that are either already depicted on the Proposed Project’s site plan and architectural plans or are required from City and State Regulations. These Project Design Features would ensure that the Proposed Project would comply with the City and State Regulations, specifically, AMC Section 18.40.090 Sound Attenuation for Residential Developments. Project Design Feature 1: The Property Owner/Developer shall construct an 8-foot high (CMU) wall along the portion of the south property line that is shared with the school to the south and along the portion of the west property line that is shared with the existing commercial uses. The existing 6-foot high CMU wall on the remaining portion of the west property line would be maintained. Project Design Feature 2: The Property Owner/Developer shall provide a means of mechanical ventilation per Chapter 12, Section 1205 of the Uniform Building Code for each proposed residential unit. This shall be achieved with a standard forced air conditioning and heating system with a filtered outside air intake vent for each residential unit. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 114 Project Design Feature 3: The Property Owner/Developer shall construct an 8-foot high sound wall along the east side (next to Loara Street) of the Northeast Courtyard and a 6-foot high sound wall along the east side (next to Loara Street) of the East Courtyard. The sound walls shall be constructed of either CMU, stucco or glass or a combination of these materials. Project Design Feature 4: The Property Owner/Developer shall provide upgraded windows and exterior doors for all residential units that are located on the eastern portion of the north side of the proposed building. The upgraded windows and doors shall have a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 29 STC. All other windows and exterior doors installed on the rest of the residential units shall be standard dual paned windows and exterior doors that have a minimum 26 STC rating. Environmental Analysis a) Would the project result in a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies, with mitigation incorporated. The following section calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the temporary construction activities and long-term operations of the Proposed Project and compares the noise levels to the City standards. Construction Related Noise Construction activities for the Proposed Project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto-related commercial structures and pavement on the Project Site, grading of the Project Site, building construction of the proposed mixed use building and parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project Site are multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School, where the nearest designated play area (two basketball courts) is as near as 25 feet south of the Project Site and nearest school structure is 120 feet south of the Project Site. Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code exempts construction noise that occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from the stationary noise standard of 60 dB at the nearby residential property lines. All construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would occur during the allowable hours for construction activities as detailed in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities and even with adherence to the City standards, the resultant construction noise levels may result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby residents. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 115 In order to determine if the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the FTA construction noise criteria thresholds detailed in Appendix J, Section 4.1 are utilized, which shows that a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeds 80 dBA Leq over an eight hour period during the daytime at the nearby homes and school. Construction noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors have been calculated through use of the RCNM and the parameters and assumptions detailed in Section 6.1 of Appendix J, including Table C – Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors (Appendix J, p. 21). The results are shown in Table 15 - Construction Noise Levels at the Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation and the RCNM printouts are provided in Appendix J. Table 15 – Construction Noise Levels at the Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation Construction Phase Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq) at: Multi-Family Homes to West1 School to South2 Demolition 75 84 Grading 76 84 Building Construction 73 77 Paving 71 80 Painting 68 72 FTA Construction Noise Threshold3 80 80 Exceed Thresholds? No Yes 1 5 dB of attenuation was added to the multi-family homes to the west in the RCNM model in order to account for the 6-foot plus walls that are located at the shared property line between the homes and Project Site. Construction activities were modeled as occurring as near as 45 feet from the multi-family homes. 2 Construction activities were modeled as occurring as near as 25 feet from the nearest school activity area (two basketball courts as near as 25 feet south of the Project Site). 3 FTA Construction Noise Threshold obtained from Appendix J, Table A. Source: RCNM, Federal Highway Administration, 2006 Table 15 shows that greatest construction noise impacts would be as high as 76 dBA Leq during the grading phase at the multi-family homes to the west and would be as high as 84 dBA Leq during the demolition and grading phases at the school to the south. The calculated construction noise levels would be within the FTA daytime construction noise standard of 80 dBA at the multi- family homes to the west but would exceed the 80 dBA noise standard at the school to the south. This would be considered a significant impact. MM NOI-1 would require the Property Owner/Developer to do one of the following prior to the start of demolition or grading activities: 1) restrict any demolition or grading equipment from operating within 50 feet of the south property line while school is in session, 2) construct a temporary 8-foot high wall along the shared property line with Loara elementary School, constructed with a minimum 5/8-inch plywood or oriented strand board (OSB) to be maintained until completion of the grading phase, or 3) construct the proposed 8-foot high CMU wall identified in Project Design Feature 1 prior to the start of any demolition or grading activities. According to Caltrans (Caltrans, 2013), a sound wall provides approximately 5 dB of attenuation at the height where it blocks the line-of-sight (approximately 6 feet high for a person standing at the nearest outside activity area at the school) and then an additional 0.9 dB for each additional foot of height, which would result in 6.8 dBA of attenuation for an 8-foot high wall. However, in 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 116 order to provide a conservative analysis, the mitigated construction noise levels shown in Table 16 - Mitigated Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Sensitive Receptors utilized a 6dB attenuation rate for the proposed wall in MM NOI-1. Table 16 – Mitigated Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Construction Phase Construction Noise Level (dBA Leq) at: Multi-Family Homes to West1 School to South2 Demolition 75 78 Grading 76 78 Building Construction 73 77 Paving 71 80 Painting 68 72 FTA Construction Noise Threshold3 80 80 Exceed Thresholds? No No 1 5 dB of attenuation was added to the multi-family homes to the west in the RCNM model in order to account for the 6-foot plus walls that are located at the shared property line between the homes and Project Site. Construction activities were modeled as occurring as near as 45 feet from the multi-family homes. 2 6 dB of attenuation was assed to the school to the south in the RCNM model in order to account for the 8-foot high wall detailed in MM NOI-1. Construction activities were modeled as occurring as near as 25 feet from the nearest school activity area (two basketball courts as near as 25 feet south of the Project Site). 3 FTA Construction Noise Threshold obtained from Appendix J, Table A. Source: RCNM, Federal Highway Administration, 2006 Table 16 shows that with implementation of MM NOI-1, the noise levels from all phases of construction at the school to the south would be below the FTA daytime construction noise standard of 80 dBA. Therefore, with implementation of MM NOI-1, and the construction time restrictions detailed in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code, potential impacts associated with construction noise would be less than significant. Operational Related Noise The Proposed Project would consist of the development of a 4-story mixed-use building with 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF leasing office and 3,413 SF retail commercial space. Potential noise impacts associated with the operations of the Proposed Project would be from project-generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways and from onsite noise sources to the adjacent school and residential properties. Project Generated Roadway Vehicular Noise Impacts to Offsite Sensitive Receptors Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The Proposed Project does not propose any uses that would require a substantial number of truck trips and the Proposed Project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway. The Proposed Project’s potential offsite noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the Proposed Project. The City’s General Plan Noise Element, Goal 2.I, Policy 3 requires new development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in noise to noise-sensitive land uses to provide appropriate mitigation. However, since the General Plan does not define what increase in roadway noise would be considered significant, the noise increase thresholds detailed in the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 117 City’s General Plan EIR has been utilized in this analysis. The General Plan EIR utilized a mobile- source noise threshold of: A 5 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are below 65 dBA CNEL at the nearest homes; or A 3 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are 65 dBA CNEL or higher. The potential offsite traffic noise impacts created by the on-going operations of the Proposed Project have been analyzed through utilization of the FHWA model and parameters described in Appendix J, Section 6.2. The Proposed Project’s potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been analyzed for the existing year and opening year 2023 scenarios. Existing Year Conditions The Proposed Project’s potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the Existing scenario to the Existing with Project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 17 - Existing Year Project Traffic Noise Contributions. Table 17 – Existing Year Project Traffic Noise Contributions dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Roadway Segment Existing No Project Existing Plus Project Project Contribution Brookhurst Street North of Lincoln Avenue 69.1 69.1 0.0 +3 dBA Euclid Street South of Broadway 66.7 66.7 0.0 +3 dBA Loara Street South of Embassy Street 60.4 60.7 0.3 +5 dBA West Street North of Lincoln Avenue 64.0 64.0 0.0 +5 dBA West Street South of Broadway 60.5 60.5 0.0 +5 dBA Harbor Boulevard North of Lincoln Avenue 68.5 68.5 0.0 +3 dBA Harbor Boulevard South of Broadway 66.0 66.0 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue West of Brookhurst Street 65.6 65.6 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of Brookhurst Street 66.2 66.2 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue West of Euclid Street 67.5 67.5 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of I-5 NB Ramps 66.3 66.3 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of West Street 63.4 63.4 0.0 +5 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of Harbor Boulevard 67.9 67.9 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Brookhurst Street 67.2 67.2 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of Brookhurst Street 67.1 67.1 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Euclid Street 68.0 68.0 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Loara Street 67.9 68.0 0.1 +3 dBA Broadway East of Loara Street 67.5 67.5 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of West Street 67.4 67.4 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of West Street 67.4 67.4 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of Harbor Boulevard 65.1 65.1 0.0 +3 dBA Notes: 1 Distance to nearest residential use shown in Table H, Appendix J, does not consider existing noise barriers. 2 Increase Threshold obtained from Anaheim General Plan Goal 2.1; Policy 3 detailed in Section 4.3,Appendix J. Source: FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Table 17 shows that for the existing year conditions, the Proposed Project’s permanent noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the noise increase thresholds. The Proposed Project would not result in a substantial 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 118 permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the existing year conditions. Therefore, potentially significant noise impacts associated with existing year conditions would be less than significant. Opening Year 2023 Conditions The Proposed Project’s potential offsite traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the opening year 2023 scenario to the opening year 2023 with project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 18 - Opening Year 2023 Project Traffic Noise Contributions. Table 18 – Opening Year 2023 Project Traffic Noise Contributions dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Roadway Segment Year 2023 No Project Year 2023 Plus Project Project Contribution Brookhurst Street North of Lincoln Avenue 69.4 69.4 0.0 +3 dBA Euclid Street South of Broadway 67.1 67.2 0.1 +3 dBA Loara Street South of Embassy Street 61.2 61.5 0.3 +5 dBA West Street North of Lincoln Avenue 64.3 64.3 0.0 +5 dBA West Street South of Broadway 60.9 60.9 0.0 +5 dBA Harbor Boulevard North of Lincoln Avenue 68.7 68.8 0.1 +3 dBA Harbor Boulevard South of Broadway 66.3 66.3 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue West of Brookhurst Street 66.0 66.0 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of Brookhurst Street 66.6 66.6 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue West of Euclid Street 67.8 67.8 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of I-5 NB Ramps 66.7 66.7 0.0 +3 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of West Street 63.8 63.9 0.1 +5 dBA Lincoln Avenue East of Harbor Boulevard 68.4 68.4 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Brookhurst Street 67.6 67.6 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of Brookhurst Street 67.5 67.5 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Euclid Street 68.5 68.5 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of Loara Street 68.6 68.6 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of Loara Street 68.0 68.0 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway West of West Street 67.9 67.9 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of West Street 67.8 67.8 0.0 +3 dBA Broadway East of Harbor Boulevard 65.4 65.4 0.0 +3 dBA Notes: 1 Distance to nearest residential use shown in Table H, Appendix J, does not consider existing noise barriers. 2 Increase Threshold obtained from Anaheim General Plan Goal 2.1; Policy 3 detailed in Section 4.3,Appendix J. Source: FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Table 18 shows that for the opening year 2023 conditions, the Proposed Project’s permanent noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the noise increase thresholds. The Proposed Project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the opening year 2023 conditions. Therefore, potentially significant noise impacts associated with opening year 2023 conditions would be less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 119 Project Generated Onsite Noise Impacts to Offsite Sensitive Receptors The operation of the Proposed Project may create an increase in onsite noise levels from noise created from the proposed rooftop mechanical equipment, dog park, basketball court, pool and spa area, and truck deliveries. Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code limits noise created on any properties to 60 dBA at any point on the adjacent residential and school properties located on the west and south side of the Project Site. In order to determine the noise impacts from the proposed rooftop mechanical equipment, dog park, basketball court, pool and spa area, and truck deliveries reference noise measurements were taken of each noise source and are shown in Table 19 - Project Operational Noise Levels at the Adjacent Residential and School Properties, which also shows the anticipated noise level from each source at the nearest off-site receptors. The operational reference noise measurements and sound wall noise reduction calculations are shown in Appendix J (see Appendix G). Table 19 – Project Operational Noise Levels at the Adjacent Residential and School Properties Location At Residential Property Line to West At School Property Line to South Distance - Source to Property Line (feet) Noise Level1 (dBA Leq) Distance - Source to Property Line (feet) Noise Level2 (dBA Leq) Rooftop Equipment3 20 43 45 37 Dog Park4 5 54 5 50 Basketball Court5 100 33 40 35 Pool and Spa Area6 100 43 40 45 Truck Delivery7 40 45 30 41 Combined Noise Level from all Sources 55 -- 52 City Noise Standard 60 60 Exceed City Noise Standard? No No Notes: 1 The calculated noise levels account for the noise reduction provided by the existing 6-foot high wall on the west property line and the proposed 4-foot parapet wall on the roof for the Rooftop Equipment (see Noise Impact Analysis Appendix G). 2 The calculated noise levels account the noise reduction provided by the proposed 8-foot high wall on the south property line that is detailed in Project Design Feature 1 and a 4-foot parapet wall on the roof for the Rooftop Equipment (see Noise Impact Analysis Appendix G). 3 The rooftop equipment was based on a noise measurement 10 feet from an operational rooftop HVAC unit that measured 66.6 dBA Leq. 4 The dog park was based on a noise measurement as near as 10 feet from dogs at Laguna Beach Dog Park that measured 60.2 dBA Leq. 5 The basketball court was based on a noise measurement as near as 5 feet from children playing at basketball court that measured 66.6 dBA Leq. 6 The pool and spa area were based on a noise measurement as near as 15 feet from a pool area with 50 people that measured 66.6 dBA Leq. 7 The truck delivery was based on a noise measurement 30 feet from a truck unloading that produced a noise level of 54.8 dBA Leq. Source: Noise calculation methodology from Caltrans, 2013. Table 19 shows that the combined noise levels from all onsite sources occurring simultaneously would be as high as 55 dBA at the shared property line with the residential uses to the west and as high as 52 dBA at the shared property line with the school to the south. The worst-case combined noise levels would be within the City’s 60 dBA noise standard. Therefore, with implementation of Project Design Feature 1 that requires construction of an 8-foot high wall along the shared property line with the school to the south, potential impacts to off-site sensitive receptors associated with noise would be less than significant. Therefore, with implementation of MM NOI-1 potential significant impacts associated with a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in excess of standards would be less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 120 b) Would the project result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would not expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The following section analyzes the potential vibration impacts associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project. Construction-Related Vibration Impacts The construction activities for the Proposed Project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto-related commercial structures and pavement on the Project Site, grading of the Project Site, building construction of the proposed mixed use building and parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. Vibration impacts from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would typically be created from the operation of heavy off-road equipment. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Project Site are multi-family homes located as near as 45 feet to the west side of the Project Site and Loara Elementary School, where the nearest school structure is 120 feet south of the Project Site. Since neither the City’s General Plan nor the Municipal Code provide a quantifiable vibration threshold for construction equipment, Caltrans guidance that is detailed in Appendix J, Section 4.2 has been utilized, which defines the threshold of perception from transient sources at 0.25 inch per second PPV. The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. As detailed in Appendix J, Table K (p. 29), a large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.089 inch per second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite sensitive receptor (multi-family homes 45 feet to the west) would be 0.10 inch per second PPV. The vibration level at the nearest offsite receptor would be within the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold. Therefore, potentially significant impacts associated with construction related vibration would be less than significant. Operations-Related Vibration Impacts The Proposed Project would consist of the development of a 4-story mixed-use building with 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF leasing office and 3,413 SF retail commercial space. The on-going operation of the Proposed Project would not include the operation of any known vibration sources other than typical onsite vehicle operations for a residential and retail commercial development. Therefore, potentially significant impacts associated with operation related vibration would be less than significant. Therefore, potential significant impacts associated with the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise level would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 121 c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport) or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project may expose people residing or working in the project area to some noise levels from aircraft. The nearest airport is Fullerton Municipal Airport which is located as near as 3.5 miles northwest of the Project Site; however, the Project Site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of this airport. The proposed residential units would not be exposed to excessive aircraft noise. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the exposure of people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures MM NOI-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall perform one of the following actions to reduce the construction-related noise impacts to Loara Elementary School, located adjacent to the south side of the Project Site: • Restrict all demolition and grading equipment from operating within 50 feet of the shared south property line with Loara Elementary School, while Loara Elementary School is in session; • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct a temporary 8-foot high wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School. The temporary wall shall be constructed with minimum 5/8-inch plywood or oriented strand board (OSB) and shall be maintained until completion of the grading phase; or • Prior to the start of demolition or grading activities, construct the proposed 8-foot high CMU wall along the shared property line with Loara Elementary School that is detailed in Project Design Feature 1. Conclusion Compliance with City and State regulations, implementation of Project Design Features 1 through 4, and implementation of MM-NOI-1 would reduce potential impacts associated with Noise to less than significant. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 122 4.14 Population and Housing Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would result in a substantial unplanned population growth if estimated development would exceed local or regional population growth projections. Federal and State law requires SCAG to develop an RTP/SCS every four years. The purpose of the RTP/SCS is to provide a “long-range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental and public health goals” (SCAG 2019). The RTP/SCS is an important regional document to guide land use planning and transportation projects in the region. Demographic projections and changes in the region are therefore an essential component for the RTP/SCS. In conjunction with the RTP/SCS, SCAG develops the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) every eight years. SCAG is currently preparing the RHNA for the 2021-2029 timeframe in conjunction with the 2020 RTP/SCS, which SCAG anticipates to it Regional Council to adopt in April 2020. The Proposed Project would consist of the development of a 4-story mixed-use building with 315 residential apartment units with 2,031 SF leasing office and 3,413 SF retail commercial space on 5.25-acres, with a projected population of 1,071 based on the average household size of 3.4 persons per the City17 and employment of approximately 8 employees based on employment density of one worker per 450 sf of retail space in Orange County18. Table 20 - Population and Housing Growth Projections for the City of Anaheim shows that the 2016-2040 RTP/SCS projects that the City of Anaheim will experience a growth of 12.5 percent, 17 https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/13910/Anaheim-Demographic-Profile?bidId= Accessed September 24, 20019 18 http://www.mwcog.org/file.aspx?A=QTTlTR24POOOUIw5mPNzK8F4d8djdJe4LF9Exj6lXOU%3D Table 5A, Page 19, Accessed March 8, 2020 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 123 17.21 percent, and 18.7 percent in population, housing, and employment respectively, by 2040 based on 2020 levels19. Table 20 - Population and Housing Growth Projections for the City of Anaheim 2020 2035 2040 Change 2019-2040 Percent Increase Proposed Project 2040 Plus Project Population 358,600 382,000 403,400 44,800 12.49% 1,071 404,471 Household 104,600 114,100 122,600 18,000 17.21% 315 122,915 Employment 207,000 236,000 245,600 38,600 18.65% 8 245,608 Jobs-Housing Ratio 1.98 2.07 2.00 n/a n/a n/a 2.00 Source: SCAG. 2016. 2016-2040 RTP-SCS. Appendix: Demographics & Growth Forecast. The additional 1,071 residents would represent less than 0.3 percent of the City’s 2040 population and an additional eight employees would represent less than .003 percent of the City’s 2040 Employment. The Proposed Project would not construct or extend roads or other infrastructure that may indirectly induce population growth; rather, existing infrastructure would be upgraded and/or replaced to accommodate the new dwelling units. The Project Site is a geographically constrained site, with two street frontages and development surrounding it on the remaining two interior property lines. Therefore, potential impacts associated with population growth would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact: The Project Site is currently developed with auto related facilities, including an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. There are no existing residential uses or structures on the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts associated with housing displacement would occur and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Population and Housing apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Population and Housing would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 19 http://www.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2016_2040RTPSCS_FinalGrowthForecastbyJurisdiction.pdf, Accessed March 8, 2020 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 124 4.15 Public Services Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ ii. Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iii. Schools? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ iv. Parks? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ v. Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact: Fire protection services for the Project Site are provided by the Anaheim Fire and Rescue (AFR), which operates 11 fire stations. AFR employs approximately 276 full-time personnel, of which 209 are sworn safety employees, 35 are civilians, and 32 are Joint Powers Authority (JPA).20F20F 20.The closest fire station to the Project Site is Fire Station No. 2, located approximately 1.1 miles northwest on Crescent Avenue.21F21F 21 Based on the proximity of the Project Site to existing AFR facilities, and since the Project Site is located in a developed portion of the City that is within the service area of AFR, the Proposed Project would be served by AFR. The construction of 315 residential units would result in approximately 1,071 residents which would represent less than 0.3 percent of the City’s build-out population, and therefore could incrementally increase demand for fire protection services. The retail commercial component of 20 Anaheim Fire & Rescue Organization Chart; see: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1275 Accessed September 25, 2019 21 Anaheim Fire & Rescue, Station Locations; see: http://www.anaheim.net/650/Station-Locations Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 125 the mixed-use development would include a nonresidential facet of the Proposed Project which would also be served by AFR. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to submit building plans that comply with AMC Title 15 - Buildings and Housing, and Title 16 – Fire to ensure the Proposed Project is developed in compliance with all applicable Building and Fire safety requirement, as well as pay the appropriate impact fees in effect at the time building permits are issued to offset any potential impact to fire facilities. Development of the Project Site would be within the growth projections for the City, and payment of impact fees would offset the nominal incremental increase in demand on fire protection services and would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. Therefore, potential impacts associated with fire protection would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. ii. Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact: The Anaheim Police Department (APD) provides law enforcement and crime prevention services in Anaheim, including emergency and non-emergency response to crimes in progress, threats to public safety, requests for assistance, accident investigation, traffic enforcement, air support, crime mapping, and narcotics/vice-related investigation and apprehension. APD employs approximately 400 sworn officers and a support staff of more than 173. The APD operates out of three stations 22 and the City is divided into four service districts – West, South, Central, and East 23. The locations of the three stations are: Headquarters Station (425 South Harbor Boulevard), East Station (8201 East Santa Ana Canyon Road), and West Station (320 South Beach Boulevard). The closest station to the Project Site is the West Station, located approximately 3 miles southwest. Based on the proximity of the Project Site to the existing APD station and since the Project Site is in a developed portion of the City that is within the service area of the APD, the Proposed Project would be served by APD. The construction of 315 residential units would result in approximately 1,071 residents which would represent less than 0.3 percent of the City’s build-out population, which could incrementally increase demand for police protection services. Further, the retail commercial component of the mixed-use development would include a nonresidential facet of the Proposed Project which would also be served by APD; however, the Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay development impact fees at the time building permits are issued to offset any potential impact to police facilities. Development of the Project Site would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, potential impacts associated with police protection would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. iii. Schools? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would include 315 residential rental units which would result in approximately 1,071 residents, representing less than 0.3 percent of the City’s build-out population. Anaheim is served by eleven school districts that oversee 49 22 https://www.anaheim.net/363/Locations Accessed September 25, 2019 23 City of Anaheim General Plan, Public Services and Facilities Element, pg. PSF-7 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 126 elementary, 10 junior high, and 14 high schools within City boundaries. These public schools currently educate well over 100,000 students and offer additional educational opportunities and facilities to the community at large. The Anaheim Elementary School District would provide elementary school education services (kindergarten through 6th grade) for students who live at the Project Site. The AESD operates 25 schools in the City. Loara Elementary School would serve the Project Site and is located adjacent to the Project Site, to the south. According to the California Department of Education, during the 2017-2018 school year, Loara Elementary had an enrollment of 590 students, which was less than the 2016-2017 school year 24. The Anaheim Union High School District would serve students in 7th through 12th grades who live at the Project Site. The AUHSD operates 20 schools in the City. Ball Junior High School serves the Project Site and is located approximately 0.9 miles to the south. According to the California Department of Education, during the 2017-2018 school year, Ball Junior High School had an enrollment of 1,090 students, which was less than the 2016-2017 school year 25. Loara High School serves the Project Site and is located approximately 1.4 miles to the southwest. According to the California Department of Education, during the 2017-2018 school year, Loara High School had an enrollment of 2,235 students, which was less than the 2016-2017 school year 26. The Proposed Project would be subject to Senate Bill 50 (SB 50), which requires the payment of mandatory impact fees to offset any impact to school facilities. The Property Owner/Developer would be required to pay its fair share of school fees in accordance with SB 50 based on the number of proposed dwelling units and square footage to offset the potential impact to school services. Therefore, potential impacts associated with schools would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. iv. Parks? Less Than Significant Impact: The Proposed Project would include 315 residential rental units that would house approximately 1,071 residents. At least a portion of these residents would patronize the park and recreation facilities located in proximity to the Project Site. There are two parks located relatively equidistant from the Project Site, which includes Chaparral Park, located approximately 0.3 miles southwest and Betsy Ross Park, located approximately 0.4 miles southeast of the Project Site. Chaparral Park offers a children’s play area, basketball court, picnic tables, fire ring, football/soccer area, recreation center, restrooms, and softball field. Betsy Ross Park offers a children’s play area, baseball field, lighted football/soccer area, lighted softball fields, outdoor basketball court, picnic shelters and picnic tables. In addition, the Proposed Project would include community outdoor recreation areas located throughout the Project Site, including four (4) community open space courtyard areas. Between all four community courtyard 24 https://www.ed-data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Elementary/Loara-Elementary Accessed September 25, 2019 25 https://www.ed-data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Union-High/Ball-Junior-High Accessed September 25, 2019 26 https://www.ed-data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Union-High/Loara-High Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 127 areas there would be three (3) outdoor kitchen/barbeque areas, a pool with shade structure, a fire pit, basketball court, entertainment plaza and night lounge, and specimen trees for shade with seating for small social events and group gatherings. In addition to the four courtyards for residents, there is a dog park and spa, walking path, and other landscaped areas throughout the site. These on-site amenities would provide an alternative to off-site public parks and recreational facilities, allowing the residents of the Proposed Project to recreate on the Project Site while incrementally reducing impacts associated with off-site public park and recreational facilities. In addition, the Proposed Project would be subject to the Quimby Act and AMC Section 17.34.010, which requires development projects to set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay in-lieu fees for park improvements. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the Property Owner/Developer would pay its fair share of in-lieu fees based on the number and type of dwelling units. Therefore, potential impacts associated with park facilities would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. v. Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact: It is reasonable to assume that at least a portion of the approximately 1,071 residents generated by the Proposed Project would patronize public facilities such as local library branches operated by the City. The Anaheim Public Library system consists of a Central Library, six branches, Anaheim Heritage Center, and Founders Park, self- service kiosk at the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), and a Mobile Library 27. The Central Library is the closest library to the Project Site, located approximately 1.0 mile to the east. According to the City’s General Plan EIR (City of Anaheim 2004), approximately 330,000 people use the Anaheim Public Library system. The Proposed Project would add approximately 1,071 residents, which represents less than 0.3% of the existing City residents who are served by the Anaheim Public Library system. The Library system provides a total of149,892 square feet of library space in variously sized facilities throughout Anaheim to serve 359,000 citizens. Additional population in the City reduces the per capita availability of physical collections, computers, programs, and space. Online resources are impacted by population growth because the licensing fees for these databases, eBooks, and other digital resources are generally linked to the population of the library’s service area. With additional residents to serve, the Proposed Project may reduce the overall availability per capita of books, media, computers, and space. Therefore, in order to maintain current per capita levels and licensing agreements, additional physical and virtual resources need to be added to the Anaheim library system. The Proposed Project would increase the City’s population by 1,071 residents. Table IV-C3, Existing Library Standards per Resident, in City’s Development Impact Fee Justification Study identifies the existing facilities standard is 0.4547 building square feet per resident and the 27 https://www.anaheim.net/903/Locations-Hours Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 128 existing materials standard is 1.7674 collection items per resident (City of Anaheim 2017). Thus, the project would require an expansion of 487 square feet to library facilities and 1,893 collection items for the Proposed Project. According to the City’s Development Impact Fee Justification Study, the City will build approximately 24,000 building square feet and acquire approximately 92,000 collection items to serve new development (City of Anaheim 2017). While the location of all future libraries has not been identified, the City anticipates building a new 10,000 square foot library facility in the Platinum Triangle area within the next five years as well as adding 14,000 square feet of library facilities within the next ten years by either building a new facility at a location to be determined in the future or by allocating this square footage to improve other library facilities to serve new development. In addition, a new bookmobile will be acquired prior to 2040 (City of Anaheim 2017). The Adopted 2019-2020 Operations Budget for the City of Anaheim further allocates $600,000 for several community service enhancements, including library materials and security gates. The Property Owner/Developer would pay all applicable impact fees designed to mitigate impacts due to new developments and would allow the City to adapt to its growing population. No physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically/altered governmental facilities would occur. Therefore, potential impacts associated with libraries and other public facilities would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Public Services apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Public Services would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 129 4.16 Recreation Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less Than Significant Impact: The Anaheim Parks Division of the Community Services Department is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of 57 parks that make up nearly 800 acres within Anaheim.28 Seven parks are located within a mile of the Project Site. The City’s goal is to provide at least two acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The Proposed Project would include 315 residential rental units that would house approximately 1,071 residents. At least a portion of these residents are anticipated to patronize the various public park and recreation facilities in proximity to the Project Site; however, the Proposed Project involves 43,196 SF of community outdoor recreation area and amenities for its residents. According to the Anaheim General Plan, Green Element Figure G-1, the Project Site is not located within a Park Deficiency Area. In addition to City parks, regional parks in Orange County provide recreational opportunities for Anaheim residents. Ralph B. Clark Regional Park in the City of Buena Park, Craig Regional Park in the City of Fullerton, and Tri-City Regional Park in the City of Placentia are within 6 miles of the Project Site to the north, and Santiago Oaks Regional Park and Yorba Regional Park are approximately 9 miles and 10 miles to the east, respectively. The closest regional park to the Project Site is Ralph B. Clark Regional Park, approximately 4.5 miles to the north. This regional park is approximately 104 acres, and equipped with softball fields, tennis courts, picnic shelters, playgrounds, group area, fishing area, amphitheater, paved walkway, unpaved trail, etc. Craig Regional Park is approximately 5.2 miles to the north, and the 124-acre regional park is characterized by rolling hills, a large variety of mature trees, open space, a small lake, three year-round creeks and a rose garden. Other park amenities also include ball fields, racquetball courts, volleyball courts, basketball courts, and horseshoe pits. These regional 28 http://ca-anaheim.civicplus.com/916/Parks-Facilities Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 130 parks are operated by OC Parks and serve regional population. Addition of 1,071 residents to the OC Parks’ regional park facilities that serve the Orange County population of 3,155,816 residents (Census 2017) would have negligible impact. The Proposed Project would be subject to the state’s Quimby Act and AMC Section 17.34.010, which requires development projects to set aside land, donate conservation easements, or pay in-lieu fees for park improvements. Pursuant to the Quimby Act, the Property Owner/Developer would pay its fair share of in-lieu fees based on the number and type of dwelling units. The Proposed Project would include community outdoor recreation areas located throughout the Project Site, including four (4) community open space courtyard areas. Between all four community courtyard areas there are three (3) outdoor kitchen/barbeque areas, a pool with shade structure, a fire pit, basketball court, entertainment plaza and night lounge, and specimen trees for shade with seating for small social events and group gatherings. In addition to the four courtyards for residents, there is a dog park and spa, walking path, and other landscaped areas throughout the site. These on-site amenities would provide an alternative to off-site public parks and recreational facilities, allowing the residents of the Proposed Project to recreate on the Project Site while incrementally reducing impacts associated with off-site public park and recreational facilities. Therefore, potential impacts associated with existing recreational facilities would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact: The Proposed Project would include outdoor community recreation areas located throughout the Project Site for the residents, including four (4) community open space courtyard areas, with three (3) outdoor kitchen/barbeque areas, a pool with shade structure, a fire pit, basketball court, entertainment plaza and night lounge, and specimen trees for shade with seating for small social events and group gatherings. As well as a dog park and spa, walking path, and other landscaped areas located on-site. These amenities would be fully contained on the Project Site and are part of the Proposed Project. As such, any potential environmental impacts related to the construction and operation of these on-site recreational amenities are accounted for in this IS/MND as part of the impact assessment conducted for the entirety of the Proposed Project. No adverse physical impacts beyond those already disclosed in this document would occur because of implementation of the Proposed Project’s on-site recreational facilities. Further, no construction or expansion of existing facilities off-site would occur as a result of the Proposed Project. Therefore, no impacts associated with the construction or expansion of recreational facilities would occur and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Recreation apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Recreation would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 131 4.17 Transportation Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Traffic Impact Analysis was completed to determine potential impacts to traffic associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix K – Traffic Impact Analysis 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments, City of Anaheim, Dudek, January 2020 (Revised April 2020)). Trip Generation To determine the Proposed Project’s traffic impacts for the Existing plus Project and Opening Year plus Project conditions, a manual trip generation, distribution, and assignment approach was utilized based on current trip rates of existing and proposed uses from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). At the time the base traffic counts were collected in the study area, there was traffic being generated from existing auto-related commercial uses on the Project Site. Trip credits were given to those existing uses, and the net project trip generation was distributed and assigned to the study area. Trip generation estimates for the Proposed Project are based on trip rates from ITE’s Trip Generation 10th Edition (2017). Trip generation rates, trip generation estimates for the existing land use, and the resulting net trip generation estimates for the Proposed Project are summarized in Table 21 - Project Trip Generation Summary which shows that the Proposed Project would generate a net of approximately 1,789 daily trips, 115 AM peak hour trips (30 inbound and 85 outbound), and 142 PM peak hour trips (86 inbound and 56 outbound). With trip credits applied for the existing uses on the site, the Proposed Project would generate a net of approximately 1,292 net daily trips, 68 AM peak hour net trips (-7 inbound and 75 outbound), and 70 PM peak hour trips (48 inbound and 22 outbound). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 132 Table 21 – Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use ITE Code Size/Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 per DU 5.44 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 Shopping Center 820 per TSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 Automobile Pars & Service Center 943 per TSF 16.28 1.43 0.53 1.96 0.90 1.36 2.26 Automobile Sales Used 841 per TSF 27.06 1.62 0.51 2.13 1.76 1.99 3.75 RV Sales 842 per TSF 5.00 0.39 0.07 0.46 0.53 0.24 0.77 Trip Generation Proposed Land Uses 4-story residential 221 315 DU 1,714 29 84 113 85 54 139 Retail (ground floor) 820 3.413 TSF 129 2 1 3 6 7 13 Total 1,842 31 85 117 91 61 152 Retail pass-by trips (33% Daily/AM, 66% PM)1 -43 -1 0 -1 -4 -4 -8 Internal trip capture (8.2% Daily, 3.3% AM, 10.0% PM)2 -11 0 0 0 -1 -1 -2 Total with trip reductions 1,789 30 85 115 86 56 142 Existing Land Uses (to be removed) Mills Collision Center 943 8.21 TSF -134 -12 -4 -16 -7 -11 -19 Hertz Car Sales 841 7.41 TSF -201 -12 -4 -16 -13 -15 -28 RV Service Solutions 842 32.69 TSF -163 -13 -2 -15 -17 -8 -25 Miranda Detail3 n/a 5 stalls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Trip Credits -498 -37 -10 -47 -38 -34 -72 NET Trip Generation 1,292 -7 75 68 48 22 70 Notes: TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Unit Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. 1 ITE Trip Generation Handbook does not provide daily and AM peak hour pass-by percentages. Daily and AM pass-by percentages were assumed to be one-half of the PM Peak Hour pass-by percentage. 2 Consistent with the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, project trip generation was adjusted to account for internal capture between the retail and residential components. As the Handbook does not contain AM Peak Hour internal capture data, NCHRP methodology was used to quantify AM peak hour internal capture trip reductions. Appendix E provides spreadsheet for internal trip capture reductions; however, due to the small size of the proposed retail land use, internal trip capture percentage reductions are applied to retail trips only for a conservative analysis. 3 The Miranda Detail Center is assumed to be an ancillary use to Mills Collision Center and Hertz Car Sales; therefore, this land use is not considered a trip generator. To determine the Proposed Project’s traffic impacts for the General Plan Amendment (i.e., plus project) condition, the City’s ATAM model was used, and the Proposed Project’s transportation analysis zone (TAZ) was modified to replace the maximum development density of the current land use designation (commercial) with the Proposed Project’s land use designation (residential mixed-use). The City’s contract traffic modeler provided all post-process General Plan level daily and peak hour traffic volumes. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 133 Trip Distribution and Assignment For the Existing plus Project and Opening Year plus Project conditions, project trip distribution percentages were based on logical travel paths to commute corridors in the study area, as well as, review of site traffic volumes in ATAM model plots provided by the City of Anaheim Public Works Department. Based on the site plan, project traffic will enter the Project Site from the right turn in/out only driveway along Lincoln Avenue and the full-access driveway along Loara Street. The westernmost driveway on Lincoln Avenue is designated as access to move-in loading area and emergency access. Project trips were assigned to the study area intersections by applying project trip generation estimates to the trip distribution percentages at each study area roadway segment and intersection. The resulting project trip distribution percentages and assignments are shown in Figures 9 and 10 (Appendix K), respectively. This trip assignment approach applies to the Existing plus Project and Opening Year plus Project conditions. For the General Plan traffic analyses, ATAM was used to determine the Proposed Project’s trip generation, distribution, and assignment. Significance Criteria Roadway Segments The City has established specific thresholds for project related increases in the V/C of study area roadway segments. The City considers LOS C, or daily V/C to not exceed 0.80 V/C, as the satisfactory LOS standard for roadway segments in its jurisdiction. Therefore, if a roadway segment is operating at LOS D or worse, a peak-hour link LOS analysis must be conducted to determine the significance of project impacts. A project is considered to have a significant impact if the roadway segments operates at LOS D, E, or F under peak-hour conditions and the project traffic increases the V/C ratio by 0.01 or greater. Intersections The City has established specific thresholds for project related increases in the V/C of study intersections. A project would create a significant impact if it causes an intersection to operate from LOS D (minimum satisfactory LOS) or better, to LOS E or F with addition of project traffic, or if the project contributes the following V/C increases at LOS C, D, E, or F: • Increase ≥ 0.050 if final V/C ratio > 0.700 – 0.800 (LOS C) • Increase ≥ 0.030 if final V/C ratio > 0.800 – 0.900 (LOS D) • Increase ≥ 0.010 if final V/C ratio > 0.900 (LOS E and F) Caltrans Ramp Intersections For Caltrans ramp intersections, the HCM 6th Edition methodology is required for the determination of project impacts. Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and D on State highway facilities. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS. If an existing State highway facility is operating at less than the appropriate target LOS, the existing MOE should be maintained. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 134 A project would create a significant impact if one of these conditions are met: • The project causes a Caltrans ramp intersection to operate from LOS D or better, to LOS E or F with addition of project traffic; or • The project would add a delay of 10 seconds or more to a Caltrans ramp intersection that is already operating at LOS E or F in the baseline (no project) condition. Traffic Impact Analysis Study Area Project Scenarios • Existing (201929) Conditions (Baseline) • Existing plus Cumulative Projects (without Proposed Project) • Existing plus Proposed Project • Opening Year Baseline (without Proposed Project) • Opening Year plus Proposed Project • General Plan (current) Condition • General Plan plus Cumulative Project – Lincoln at Euclid (without Proposed Project) • General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project Conditions Study Segments and Intersections As coordinated and scoped with the City Public Works Department, the study area is comprised of 10 roadway segments and 16 intersections shown in Table 22 - Traffic Impact Analysis Study Segments and Intersections. Figure 1 of Appendix K shows the locations of the study area intersections and roadway segments. 29 Per the City, the traffic volumes from 2017 and 2018 have been adjusted to 2019 conditions using an annual ambient growth rate of 1% (Appendix K, p. 10). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 135 Table 22 – Traffic Impact Analysis Study Segments and Intersections Study Intersections 1. Brookhurst Street/Lincoln Avenue 9. Manchester Avenue/Lincoln Avenue 2. Brookhurst Street/Broadway 10. Manchester Avenue/Broadway 3. Euclid Street/Interstate 5 (I-5) ramps 11. I-5 northbound ramps – Wilshire Avenue/Lincoln Avenue 4. Euclid Street/Lincoln Avenue 12. West Street/Lincoln Avenue 5. Euclid Street/Broadway 13. West Street/Broadway 6. Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue 14. Harbor Boulevard/Lincoln Avenue 7. Loara Street/Broadway 15. Harbor Boulevard/Broadway 8. I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue 16. Loara Street/Project Driveway – Embassy Street Roadway Segments 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller Street to Euclid Street 2. Lincoln Avenue, Euclid Street to Loara Street 3. Lincoln Avenue, Interstate 5 (I-5) northbound ramps to West Street 4. Lincoln Avenue, West Street to Harbor Boulevard 5. Broadway, Nutwood Street to Euclid Street 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street 7. Broadway, Manchester Avenue to West Street 8. Euclid Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway 9. Euclid Street, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Avenue 10. Loara Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway Existing Conditions The degree of congestion at an intersection is described by the level of service (LOS), which ranges from LOS A to LOS F, with LOS A representing free-flow conditions with little delay and LOS F representing over-saturated traffic flow throughout the peak hour. Roadway System The major arterials that serve the study area include Lincoln Avenue, Broadway, Brookhurst Street, Euclid Street, and Harbor Boulevard. Interstate 5 is located north and east of the Project Site. I-5 is a 10-lane divided freeway within the vicinity of the Project Site and serves as a main thoroughfare for traffic traveling north towards Los Angeles and south towards San Diego. The posted speed limit is 65 miles per hour (MPH), and ramp interchanges in the study area are located at Euclid Street and Lincoln Avenue. Lincoln Avenue borders the Project Site to the north and runs generally east-west through the City. Lincoln Avenue is a four-lane divided roadway and is identified as a Primary Arterial by the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH within the vicinity of the Project Site, and street parking is allowed in marked areas. Direct access to I-5 is provided from Lincoln Avenue. Broadway is located south of the Project Site and runs generally east-west through the City. Broadway is a four-lane, undivided roadway and is identified as a Secondary Arterial by the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH within the vicinity of the Project Site, and street parking is allowed in marked areas. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 136 Brookhurst Street is located west of the Project Site and serves as a primary north-south corridor through the City. Brookhurst Street is a six-lane, undivided roadway with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) and is identified as a Major Arterial by the City of Anaheim Circulation Element. The posted speed limit is 40 MPH within the vicinity of the Project Site, and street parking is not allowed within the study area. Euclid Street is located west of the Project Site and serves as a primary north-south corridor through the City. Euclid Street is a six-lane, divided roadway north of Broadway, and a four-lane divided road with a TWLTL south of Broadway. The City of Anaheim Circulation Element identifies Euclid Street as a Primary Arterial. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH within the vicinity of the Project Site, and street parking is not allowed within the study area. Harbor Boulevard is located east of the Project Site and serves as a primary north-south corridor through the City. Harbor Boulevard is a four-lane, divided roadway within the study area, and is identified as a Major Arterial by the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element. The posted speed limit is 35 MPH, and street parking is not allowed within the study area. Loara Street borders the Project Site to the east and would provide access to the Proposed Project. Loara Street is a two-lane, undivided roadway within the study area, with a posted speed of 30 MPH. Street parking is allowed in marked areas. Transit System The Metrolink Orange County Line and the Amtrak Pacific Surfliner provide rail transit within the City of Anaheim. The two nearest rail transit stations are located approximately 4 to 5 miles northeast or southeast of the Project Site, at the Fullerton Station and at the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center, respectively. In addition to Metrolink and Amtrak services, local public transportation services operated by OCTA are also available in the study area. The Project Site is currently served by the following routes: • OCTA Bus Route #42 • OCTA Bus Route #37 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street provide pedestrian access to and from the Project Site. Existing sidewalks, with curb and gutter, are available on both sides of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, with the exception of an approximately 150 – 200-foot stretch along either side of Lincoln Avenue, east of the train tracks and along either side of Loara Street, north of the train tracks, adjacent to unimproved parcels. There is an existing Class II bike lane along Euclid Street between Ball Road and Lincoln Avenue, and along Brookhurst Street, south of Crescent Avenue. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 137 Roadway Segments A roadway segment LOS analysis was prepared for the existing condition and Table 23 - Existing Roadway Segment ADT LOS shows the results of the existing condition LOS analysis for the study roadway segments. Table 23 – Existing Roadway Segment ADT LOS Roadway Segment Facility Type Daily Capacity (vehicles/day)1 Existing ADT V/C LOS 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller Street to Euclid Street 4D 37,500 36,063 0.962 E 2. Lincoln Avenue, Euclid Street to Loara Street 4D 37,500 25,043 0.668 B 3. Lincoln Avenue, I-5 NB ramps to West Street 6D 56,300 34,052 0.605 B 4. Lincoln Avenue, West Street to Harbor Boulevard 4U 25,000 28,594 1.144 F 5. Broadway, Nutwood Street to Euclid Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 20,332 0.813 D 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 19,854 0.794 C 7. Broadway, Manchester Avenue to West Street 4U 25,000 19,977 0.799 C 8. Euclid Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway 6D 56,300 41,896 0.744 C 9. Euclid Street, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Avenue 6D 56,300 48,693 0.865 D 10. Loara Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway 2U 12,500 7,782 0.623 B Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ADT – Average Daily Traffic; V/C = volume-to-capacity; LOS – Level of Service; XD – # lanes, divided; XU – # lanes, undivided; TWLTL – two-way left-turn lane 1 Daily capacity provided by the Orange County General Plan, Circulation Element, Table IV-2B, Appendix IV-2 for each facility type BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS If a roadway segment is found to be operating at a deficient LOS (LOS D, E, or F) in the daily condition, a peak hour link analysis is required to be conducted to determine the significance of project impacts. A peak hour link analysis was conducted for the four deficient segments in the daily condition. As shown in Table 24 - Existing Roadway Segment Peak Hour LOS, under peak hour conditions, the impacted segments during daily conditions currently operate with satisfactory LOS (LOS C or better). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 138 Table 24 – Existing Roadway Segment Peak Hour LOS Roadway Segment Mid- Block Lanes Link Capacity (vehicles/hour)1 Peak Hour Existing Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS NB or EB SB or WB 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,591 771 0.328 A 7,200 PM 1,230 1,085 0.322 A 4. Lincoln Ave, West St to Harbor Blvd 4 7,200 AM 1,286 1,056 0.325 A 7,200 PM 1,125 1,279 0.334 A 5. Broadway, Nutwood St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,139 643 0.248 A 7,200 PM 720 892 0.224 A 9. Euclid St, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Ave 6 10,800 AM 1,684 1,701 0.313 A 10,800 PM 1,702 2,150 0.357 A Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: V/C = volume-to-capacity 1 Link capacity determined from Equation 16-1 of the HCM. 2 Peak hour flow determined from study area peak hour intersection approach volumes at the downstream intersection. BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS Existing Intersection Operations An intersection LOS analysis was prepared for the existing conditions and Table 25 - Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS shows the existing conditions LOS analysis. Existing Queuing A queuing analysis was conducted for the three freeway ramp intersections within the study area. Table 26 - Existing Queuing Analysis summarizes existing queuing results at each of the freeway off-ramps in the study area. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 139 Table 25 – Existing Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS No. Intersection LOS Method Existing AM Peak PM Peak V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 1 Brookhurst Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.617 B 0.651 B 2 Brookhurst Street/Broadway ICU 0.606 B 0.660 B 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps ICU 0.697 B 0.780 C HCM 47.1 D 56.2 E 4 Euclid Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.659 B 0.687 B 5 Euclid Street/Broadway ICU 0.829 D 0.864 D 6 Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.691 B 0.539 A 7 Loara Street/Broadway ICU 0.570 A 0.572 A 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.610 B 0.542 A HCM 31.2 C 17.9 B 9 Manchester Avenue/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.475 A 0.420 A 10 Manchester Avenue/Broadway ICU 0.607 B 0.526 A 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.663 B 0.627 B HCM 49.9 D 38.9 D 12 West Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.541 A 0.581 A 13 West Street/Broadway ICU 0.540 A 0.546 A 14 Harbor Boulevard/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.765 C 0.813 D 15 Harbor Boulevard/Broadway ICU 0.720 C 0.705 C 16 Loara St/Project Dwy – Embassy St (TWSC) HCM 13.6 B 16.7 C Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; HCM = Highway Capacity Manual; TWSC = two-way stop-controlled intersection 1 Volume-to-capacity ratio for signalized intersections; delay in seconds per vehicle for Caltrans intersections. 2 Level of Service (LOS). BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 140 Table 26 – Existing Queuing Analysis No. Intersection Movement Pocket Length1 Existing2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? AM PM AM PM 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps NBL1 480 260 500 No Yes NBL2 480 304 531 No Yes NBR 145 110 112 No No SBL1 175 176 190 Yes Yes SBL2 200 186 185 No No SBR 280 181 219 No No EBL 400 253 351 No No EBLTR3 1,900 321 464 No No EBR 400 265 377 No No WBL 900 243 320 No No WBLTR3 1,450 303 388 No No WBR 425 263 354 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue SBL1 1,185 105 112 No No SBL23 2,215 146 158 No No SBR 765 46 63 No No EBL1 270 330 225 Yes No EBL2 270 376 244 Yes No WBR 475 226 159 No No 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue NBL 500 133 292 No No NBTL3 1,135 211 382 No No NBR 195 131 253 No Yes4 EBL 250 107 145 No No EBTR 700 299 243 No No WBL1 130 191 173 Yes Yes WBL2 130 189 159 Yes Yes WBTR 825 211 290 No No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: 1 Measured in feet. 2 Based on 95th percentile (design) queue length in SimTraffic 10. 3 Primary offramp lane; approximate length measured from freeway mainline. 4 While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,135 feet, therefore queue would not impact the mainline lanes. XX – Queue exceeds storage length. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 141 Environmental Analysis a) Would the project conflict with program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would generate a net of approximately 1,789 daily trips, 115 AM peak hour trips (30 inbound and 85 outbound), and 142 PM peak hour trips (86 inbound and 56 outbound). With trip credits applied for the existing uses on the site, the Proposed Project would generate a net of approximately 1,292 net daily trips, 68 AM peak hour net trips (-7 inbound and 75 outbound), and 70 PM peak hour trips (48 inbound and 22 outbound). In the Existing plus Proposed Project condition, all the study area roadway segments would continue to operate at LOS C or better under daily segment operations, except for the same four segments identified in the Existing conditions (Table 23). The peak hour analysis (Table 24) shows all roadway segments operating at LOS A. Existing plus Proposed Project Intersections All the study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate with satisfactory LOS, at LOS D or better, under Existing plus Proposed Project conditions during both peak hours, except for the intersection of Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps. This intersection is forecast to continue to operate at LOS E in the PM peak hour with addition of project traffic as shown below in Table 27 – Existing plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS, which is acceptable as it’s an existing condition that would not be further degraded. Therefore, no impacts associated with Existing plus Proposed Project intersections and project traffic would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 142 This page intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 143 Table 27 – Existing plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS No. Intersection LOS Method Existing Existing plus Project Change in V/C or Delay Significant Impact? AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 AM PM AM PM 1 Brookhurst Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.617 B 0.651 B 0.617 B 0.653 B 0.000 0.002 No No 2 Brookhurst Street/Broadway ICU 0.606 B 0.66 B 0.609 B 0.662 B 0.003 0.002 No No 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps ICU 0.697 B 0.78 C 0.697 B 0.784 C 0.000 0.004 No No HCM 47.1 D 56.2 E 47.3 D 56.8 E 0.200 0.600 No No 4 Euclid Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.659 B 0.687 B 0.659 B 0.689 B 0.000 0.002 No No 5 Euclid Street/Broadway ICU 0.829 D 0.864 D 0.832 D 0.865 D 0.003 0.001 No No 6 Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.691 B 0.539 A 0.699 B 0.549 A 0.008 0.010 No No 7 Loara Street/Broadway ICU 0.57 A 0.572 A 0.573 A 0.582 A 0.003 0.010 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.61 B 0.542 A 0.613 B 0.546 A 0.003 0.004 No No HCM 31.2 C 17.9 B 31.7 C 17.9 B 0.500 0.000 No No 9 Manchester Avenue/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.475 A 0.42 A 0.476 A 0.421 A 0.001 0.001 No No 10 Manchester Avenue/Broadway ICU 0.607 A 0.526 A 0.609 B 0.526 A 0.002 0.000 No No 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.663 A 0.627 A 0.664 B 0.628 B 0.001 0.001 No No HCM 49.9 D 38.9 D 50.5 D 39.0 D 0.600 0.100 No No 12 West Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.541 A 0.581 A 0.542 A 0.582 A 0.001 0.001 No No 13 West Street/Broadway ICU 0.54 A 0.546 A 0.541 A 0.547 A 0.001 0.001 No No 14 Harbor Boulevard/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.765 C 0.813 D 0.765 C 0.814 D 0.000 0.001 No No 15 Harbor Boulevard/Broadway ICU 0.72 C 0.705 C 0.721 C 0.706 C 0.001 0.001 No No 16 Loara/Project Dwy- Embassy (TWSC) HCM 13.6 B 16.7 C 17.7 C 15.9 C 4.1 -0.8 Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; HCM = Highway Capacity Manual; TWSC = two-way stop-controlled intersection 1 Volume-to-capacity ratio for signalized intersections; delay in seconds per vehicle for Caltrans intersections. 2 Level of Service (LOS). Bold value indicates unsatisfactory LOS; Bold indicates significant impact 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 144 This page intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 145 Roadway Segments Under Existing plus Proposed Project conditions, the following roadway segments are forecast to continue to operate with unsatisfactory LOS (LOS D) or worse based on daily (ADT) conditions, as shown in Table 28 - Existing plus Project Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller Street to Euclid Street (LOS E, +0.005 V/C increase) 4. Lincoln Avenue, West Street to Harbor Boulevard (LOS F, +0.0023 V/C increase) 5. Broadway, Nutwood Street to Euclid Street (LOS D, +0.007 V/C increase) 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street (LOS D, +0.010 V/C increase) 7. Broadway, Manchester Avenue to Harbor Boulevard (LOS D, +0.003 V/C increase) 9. Euclid Street, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Avenue (LOS D, 0.007 V/C increase) Based on the V/C increases created by the Proposed Project shown in Table 28, the Proposed Project would not create a significant impact at all segments as the V/C increases are less than 0.010 V/C per the City’s significance criteria, with the exception of the Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street segment due to a 0.010 V/C increase. Additionally, per the City’s guidance, Table 29 – Existing plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service, a peak hour analysis was performed at these six roadway segments, and found that all roadway segments are forecast to operate at LOS A under peak hour conditions, which demonstrates that the Proposed Project would not impact the study area roadway segments under Existing plus Proposed Project conditions. Therefore, no impacts associated with Existing plus Proposed Project queuing roadway segments would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 146 This page intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 147 Table 28 - Existing plus Project Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service Roadway Segment Facility Type Daily Capacity (vehicles/ day)1 Existing Existing plus Project Change in V/C Significant Impact? ADT V/C L O S ADT V/C LOS 1. Lincoln Avenue, East of Crescent Way 4D 37,500 36,063 0.962 E 36,257 0.967 E 0.005 No 2. Lincoln Avenue, East of Euclid Street 4D 37,500 25,043 0.668 B 25,689 0.685 B 0.017 No 3. Lincoln Avenue, East of Wilshire Avenue 6D 56,300 34,052 0.605 B 34,142 0.606 B 0.001 No 4. Lincoln Avenue, West of Harbor Boulevard 4U 25,000 28,594 1.144 F 28,658 1.146 F 0.002 No 5. Broadway, West of Euclid Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 20,332 0.813 D 20,500 0.820 D 0.007 No 6. Broadway, East of Euclid Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 19,854 0.794 C 20,112 0.804 D 0.010 Yes 7. Broadway, West of West Street 4U 25,000 19,977 0.799 C 20,041 0.802 D 0.003 No 8. Euclid Street, South of Lincoln Avenue 6D 56,300 41,896 0.744 C 41,934 0.745 C 0.001 No 9. Euclid Street, North of Lincoln Avenue 6D 56,300 48,693 0.865 D 49,107 0.872 D 0.007 No 10. Loara Street, South of Lincoln Avenue 2U 12,500 7,782 0.623 B 8,386 0.671 B 0.048 No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ADT – Average Daily Traffic; V/C = volume-to-capacity; LOS – Level of Service; XD – # lanes, divided; XU – # lanes, undivided; TWLTL – two-way left-turn lane 1 Daily capacity provided by the Orange County General Plan, Circulation Element, Table IV-2B, Appendix IV-2 for each facility type BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 148 Table 29 - Existing plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service Roadway Segment Mid- Block Lanes Link Capacity (vehicles/hour)1 Peak Hour Existing Existing plus Project Change in V/C Significant Impact? Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS NB or EB SB or WB NB or EB SB or WB 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,591 771 0.328 A 1,590 783 0.330 A 0.002 No 7,200 PM 1,230 1,085 0.322 A 1,237 1,088 0.323 A 0.001 No 4. Lincoln Ave, West St to Harbor Blvd 4 7,200 AM 1,286 1,056 0.325 A 1,290 1,056 0.326 A 0.001 No 7,200 PM 1,125 1,279 0.334 A 1,126 1,281 0.334 A 0.000 No 5. Broadway, Nutwood St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,139 643 0.248 A 1,138 653 0.249 A 0.001 No 7,200 PM 720 892 0.224 A 726 895 0.225 A 0.001 No 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara St 4 7,200 AM 1,223 685 0.265 A 1,222 700 0.267 A 0.002 No 7,200 PM 812 1,048 0.258 A 822 1,053 0.260 A 0.002 No 7. Broadway, Manchester to West St 4 7,200 AM 1,126 846 0.274 A 1,130 846 0.274 A 0.000 No 7,200 PM 905 1,153 0.286 A 906 1,155 0.286 A 0.000 No 9. Euclid St, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Ave 6 10,800 AM 1,684 1,701 0.313 A 1,7097 1,699 0.316 A 0.003 No 10,800 PM 1,702 2,150 0.357 A 1,7097 2,165 0.359 A 0.002 No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: V/C = volume-to-capacity 1 Link capacity determined from Equation 16-1 of the HCM. 2 Peak hour flow determined from study area peak hour intersection approach volumes at the downstream intersection Bold value indicates unsatisfactory LOS; Bold indicates significant impact 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 149 Queuing Under Existing plus Proposed Project conditions, all study area off-ramps are forecast to exceed some of the storage pockets lengths on the southbound turn lanes on Euclid Street; and, the east- and westbound turn lanes on Lincoln Avenue at both ramp intersections, as shown in Table 30 – Existing plus Project Queuing Analysis. None of the off-ramp queues would exceed their storage pocket lengths with exception of the northbound right turn lane at I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue (intersection #11). While the PM peak hour queue of 273 feet is forecast to continue to extend beyond the existing 195-foot storage lane, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,135 feet and the queue would not extend to the I-5 mainline lanes and impede mainline operations. Therefore, no impacts associated with Existing plus Proposed Project queuing would occur. Table 30 – Existing plus Project Queuing Analysis No. Movement Pocket Length1 Existing plus Project2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? AM PM AM PM 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps NBL1 480 301 516 No Yes NBL2 480 353 552 No Yes NBR 145 126 98 No No SBL1 175 178 177 Yes Yes SBL2 200 186 185 No No SBR 280 188 223 No No EBL 400 270 386 No No EBLTR3 1,900 338 506 No No EBR 400 297 390 No No WBL 900 240 313 No No WBLTR3 1,450 309 396 No No WBR 425 259 360 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue SBL1 1,185 114 124 No No SBL23 2,215 155 163 No No SBR 765 41 58 No No EBL1 270 323 228 Yes No EBL2 270 366 246 Yes No WBR 475 237 194 No No 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue NBL 500 149 336 No No NBTL3 1,135 222 416 No No NBR 195 145 273 No Yes4 EBL 250 136 155 No No EBTR 700 331 263 No No WBL1 130 193 175 Yes Yes WBL2 130 186 157 Yes Yes WBTR 825 207 286 No No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: 1 Measured in feet. 2 Based on 95th percentile (design) queue length in SimTraffic 10. 3 Primarily offramp lane; approximate length measured from freeway mainline. 4 While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the offramp is 1,135 feet, therefore queue would not impact mainline lanes. XX – Queue exceeds storage length 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 150 Opening Year Plus Proposed Project Intersections All of the study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate with satisfactory LOS, at LOS D or better, under Opening Year plus Proposed Project conditions during both peak hours, as shown in Table 31 – Opening Year plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS(, except for the intersection of Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps (Intersection #3) and Euclid Street/Broadway (Intersection #5). Intersection #3 is forecast to continue to operate at LOS E in both peak hours under the HCM 6 methodology required by Caltrans. However, since the Proposed Project’s addition of delay to this ramp intersection is less than 10 seconds in the AM and PM peak hours (Table 31), the Proposed Project’s impact to this intersection would be less than significant. Additionally, intersection #5 is forecast to continue to operate at LOS E in both peak hours; however, since the Proposed Project’s addition of traffic to this intersection results in a V/C ratio increase less than 0.01 in the AM and PM peak hours, the Proposed Project’s impact to this intersection would be less than significant (Table 31). Roadway Segments Under Opening Year Plus Proposed Project conditions, the following roadway segments are forecast to continue to operate with unsatisfactory LOS (LOS D) or worse based on daily (ADT) conditions: 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller Street to Euclid Street (LOS F) 4. Lincoln Avenue, West Street to Harbor Boulevard (LOS F) 5. Broadway, Nutwood Street to Euclid Street (LOS E) 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street (LOS E) 7. Broadway, Manchester Avenue to West Street (LOS E) 8. Euclid Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway (LOS D) 9. Euclid Street, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Avenue (LOS E) Based on the V/C increases created by the Proposed Project (Table 21 – Appendix K, p. 74), the Proposed Project would not create a significant impact at these segments as the Proposed Project’s V/C increases are less than 0.010 V/C per the City’s significance criteria, with the exception of the Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street segment due to a 0.010 V/C increase. Additionally, per the City’s guidance, a peak hour analysis was performed at these seven roadway segments as shown in Table 32 – Opening Year plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service, and found that all roadway segments are forecast to operate at LOS A under peak hour conditions, which demonstrates that the Proposed Project would not impact the study area roadway segments under Opening Year plus Proposed Project conditions. Therefore, no impacts associated with Opening Year plus Proposed Project roadway segments would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 151 Table 31 - Opening Year plus Project Weekday Peak Hour Intersection LOS No. Intersection LOS Method Opening Year (without Project) Opening Year plus Project Change in V/C or Delay Significant Impact? AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 V/C or Delay1 LOS2 AM PM AM PM 1 Brookhurst Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.657 B 0.693 B 0.657 B 0.695 B 0.000 0.002 No No 2 Brookhurst Street/Broadway ICU 0.688 B 0.710 C 0.691 B 0.711 C 0.003 0.001 No No 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps ICU 0.734 C 0.839 D 0.735 C 0.843 D 0.001 0.004 No No HCM 55.2 E 66.5 E 55.7 E 67.1 E 0.5 0.6 No No 4 Euclid Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.713 C 0.744 C 0.713 C 0.746 C 0.000 0.002 No No 5 Euclid Street/Broadway ICU 0.959 E 0.945 E 0.962 E 0.946 E 0.003 0.001 No No 6 Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.796 C 0.619 B 0.802 D 0.628 B 0.008 0.009 No No 7 Loara Street/Broadway ICU 0.73 C 0.685 B 0.740 C 0.694 B 0.010 0.009 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.653 B 0.618 B 0.656 B 0.622 B 0.003 0.004 No No HCM 35.5 D 19.5 B 35.5 D 19.5 B 0.0 0.0 No No 9 Manchester Avenue/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.507 A 0.451 A 0.509 A 0.452 A 0.002 0.001 No No 10 Manchester Avenue/ Broadway ICU 0.678 B 0.575 A 0.680 B 0.576 A 0.002 0.001 No No 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.711 B 0.672 B 0.712 C 0.675 B 0.001 0.003 No No HCM 50.6 D 46.5 D 51.1 D 46.7 D 0.5 0.2 No No 12 West Street/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.595 A 0.626 B 0.596 A 0.627 B 0.001 0.001 No No 13 West Street/Broadway ICU 0.593 A 0.603 B 0.594 A 0.604 B 0.001 0.001 No No 14 Harbor Boulevard/Lincoln Avenue ICU 0.813 D 0.879 D 0.820 D 0.880 D 0.001 0.001 No No 15 Harbor Boulevard/Broadway ICU 0.789 C 0.756 C 0.791 C 0.756 C 0.002 0.000 No No 16 Loara/Project Dwy- Embassy (TWSC) HCM 19.3 C 20.5 C 32.5 D 19.5 C 13.2 -1.0 No No 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 152 Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; HCM = Highway Capacity Manual 1 Volume-to-capacity ratio for signalized intersections; delay in seconds per vehicle for Caltrans intersections 2 Level of Service (LOS). BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS; BOLD indicates significant impact Table 32 - Opening Year plus Project Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service Roadway Segment Mid- Block Lanes Link Capacity (vehicles/hour)1 Peak Hour Opening Year (without Project) Opening Year plus Project Change in V/C Significant Impact? Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS NB or EB SB or WB NB or EB SB or WB 1. Lincoln Avenue, Muller St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,706 845 0.354 A 1,705 857 0.356 A 0.002 No 7,200 PM 1,341 1,182 0.350 A 1,348 1,185 0.352 A 0.002 No 4. Lincoln Ave, West St to Harbor Blvd 4 7,200 AM 1,414 1,195 0.362 A 1,418 1,195 0.363 A 0.001 No 7,200 PM 1,272 1,424 0.374 A 1,273 1,426 0.375 A 0.001 No 5. Broadway, Nutwood St to Euclid St 4 7,200 AM 1,295 762 0.286 A 1,294 772 0.287 A 0.001 No 7,200 PM 808 985 0.249 A 814 988 0.250 A 0.001 No 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara St 4 7,200 AM 1,457 872 0.323 A 1,456 887 0.325 A 0.002 No 7,200 PM 943 1,184 0.295 A 953 1,187 0.298 A 0.003 No 7. Broadway, Manchester to West St 4 7,200 AM 1,265 983 0.312 A 1,269 983 0.313 A 0.001 No 7,200 PM 1,015 1,273 0.318 A 1,016 1,275 0.318 A 0.000 No 8. Euclid St, Lincoln Ave to Broadway 6 10,800 AM 1,637 1,458 0.287 A 1,637 1,460 0.287 A 0.000 No 10,800 PM 1,658 1,967 0.336 A 1,659 1,968 0.336 A 0.000 No 9. Euclid St, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Ave 6 10,800 AM 1,855 1,836 0.342 A 1,880 1,834 0.344 A 0.002 No 10,800 PM 1,890 2,334 0.391 A 1,897 2,349 0.393 A 0.002 No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: V/C = volume-to-capacity 1 Link capacity determined from Equation 16-1 of the HCM. 2 Peak hour flow determined from study area peak hour intersection approach volumes at the downstream intersection. BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS; BOLD indicates significant impact 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 153 Queuing Under Opening Year Plus Proposed Project conditions, forecasted queue lengths are expected to exceed some of the turn pockets lengths at Caltrans ramp intersections from the local streets. These locations are on the north- and southbound turn lanes on Euclid Street; and, the east- and westbound turn lanes on Lincoln Avenue at both ramp intersections, as shown in Table 33 – Opening Year plus Project Queuing Analysis. None of the off-ramp queues would exceed their storage pocket lengths with exception of the eastbound left- and right-turn lanes at Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps (intersection #3) and northbound right turn lane at I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue (intersection #11). While the PM peak hour queues of 436 feet and 426 feet for the eastbound left- and right- turn lanes, respectively, at intersection #3 would extend beyond the existing 400-foot striped storage lanes, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,900 feet. Similarly, while the PM peak hour queue of 292 feet would extend beyond the existing 195-foot striped storage lane at intersection #11, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,135 feet and the queues would not extend to the I-5 mainline lanes and impede mainline operations. Therefore, no impacts associated with Opening Year plus Proposed Project queuing would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 154 Table 33 - Opening Year plus Project Queuing Analysis No. Intersection Movement Pocket Length1 Opening Year plus Project2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? AM PM AM PM 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps NBL1 480 517 577 Yes Yes NBL2 480 558 586 Yes Yes NBR 145 149 129 Yes No SBL1 175 176 176 Yes Yes SBL2 200 185 186 No No SBR 280 169 219 No No EBL 400 288 436 No Yes4 EBLTR3 1,900 348 562 No No EBR 400 289 426 No Yes4 WBL 900 252 361 No No WBLTR3 1,450 316 450 No No WBR 425 268 407 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue SBL1 1,185 137 138 No No SBL23 2,215 176 175 No No SBR 765 56 69 No No EBL1 270 333 255 Yes No EBL2 270 375 285 Yes Yes WBR 475 270 185 No No 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue NBL 500 207 420 No No NBTL3 1,135 256 524 No No NBR 195 196 292 Yes Yes5 EBL 250 166 166 No No EBTR 700 348 287 No No WBL1 130 189 173 Yes Yes WBL2 130 194 151 Yes Yes WBTR 825 229 382 No No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: 1 Measured in feet. 2 Based on 95th percentile (design) queue length in SimTraffic 10. 3 Primarily offramp lane; approximate length measured from freeway mainline. 4 While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the offramp is 1,900 feet, therefore queue would not impact mainline lanes. 5 While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the offramp is 1,135 feet, therefore queue would not impact mainline lanes. XX – Queue exceeds storage length 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 155 General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project Intersections Most of the study area intersections are forecast to continue to operate at LOS D or better, except for the same unsatisfactory intersections noted in the General Plan plus Cumulative Project – Lincoln at Euclid (without Proposed Project) condition, which is acceptable as it’s an existing condition that would not be further degraded. Therefore, no significant impacts associated with General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project intersections and project traffic would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Roadway Segments Under General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project conditions shown in Table 34 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service, the following roadway segments are forecast to continue to operate with unsatisfactory LOS (LOS D) or worse based on daily (ADT) conditions, which is acceptable as it’s an existing condition that would not be further degraded: 5. Broadway, Nutwood Street to Euclid Street (LOS D) 6. Broadway, Euclid Street to Loara Street (LOS D) 7. Broadway, Manchester Avenue to West Street (LOS D) 8. Euclid Street, Lincoln Avenue to Broadway (LOS D) 9. Euclid Street, I-5 ramps to Lincoln Avenue (LOS E) Based on the V/C increases created by the Proposed Project (Table 34), the Proposed Project would not create a significant impact at these segments as the Proposed Project’s V/C increases are less than 0.010 V/C per the City’s significance criteria. Additionally, per the City’s guidance, a peak hour analysis was performed at these five roadway segments shown in Table 35 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service, and found that all roadway segments are forecast to operate at LOS A under peak hour conditions, which further demonstrates that the Proposed Project would not impact the study area roadway segments under Existing plus Proposed Project conditions. Therefore, no significant impacts associated with General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project roadway segments would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 156 This page intentionally left blank. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 157 Table 34 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment ADT Level of Service Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: ADT – Average Daily Traffic; V/C = volume-to-capacity; LOS – Level of Service; XD – # lanes, divided; XU – # lanes, undivided; TWLTL – two-way left-turn lane 1 Daily capacity provided by the Orange County General Plan, Circulation Element, Table IV-2B, Appendix IV-2 for each facility type BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS Roadway Segment Facility Type Daily Capacity (vehicles/day)1 General Plan plus Shopoff Site (without Project) General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Change in V/C ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS 1. Lincoln Avenue, East of Crescent Way 6D 56,300 42,450 0.754 C 42,350 0.752 C -0.002 2. Lincoln Avenue, East of Euclid Street 6D 56,300 37,800 0.671 B 37,700 0.670 B -0.001 3. Lincoln Avenue, East of Wilshire Avenue 6D 56,300 37,700 0.670 B 37,800 0.671 B 0.002 4. Lincoln Avenue, West of Harbor Boulevard 6D 56,300 32,900 0.584 A 33,100 0.588 A 0.004 5. Broadway, West of Euclid Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 22,200 0.888 D 22,200 0.888 D 0.000 6. Broadway, East of Euclid Street 4U (w/TWLTL) 25,000 21,700 0.868 D 21,700 0.868 D 0.000 7. Broadway, West of West Street 4U 25,000 21,800 0.872 D 21,800 0.872 D 0.000 8. Euclid Street, South of Lincoln Avenue 6D 56,300 48,000 0.853 D 48,100 0.854 D 0.001 9. Euclid Street, North of Lincoln Avenue 6D 56,300 52,800 0.938 E 52,800 0.938 E 0.000 10. Loara Street, South of Lincoln Avenue 2U 12,500 8,500 0.680 B 8,500 0.680 B 0.000 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 158 Table 35 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Roadway Segment Peak Hour Level of Service Roadway Segment Mid- Block Lanes Link Capacity (vehicles/hour)1 Peak Hour General Plan plus Cumulative Project (without Project) General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Change in V/C Significant Impact? Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS Peak Hour Flow2 V/C LOS 5. Broadway, West of Euclid Street 4 7,200 AM 1,840 0.256 A 1,840 0.256 A 0.000 No 7,200 PM 1,940 0.269 A 1,940 0.269 A 0.000 No 6. Broadway, East of Euclid Street 4 7,200 AM 2,010 0.279 A 2,010 0.279 A 0.000 No 7,200 PM 1,990 0.276 A 1,990 0.276 A 0.000 No 7. Broadway, West of West Street 4 7,200 AM 1,900 0.264 A 1,900 0.264 A 0.000 No 7,200 PM 2,140 0.297 A 2,140 0.297 A 0.000 No 8. Euclid Street, South of Lincoln Ave 6 7,200 AM 2,800 0.259 A 2,800 0.259 A 0.000 No 7,200 PM 3,430 0.318 A 3,440 0.319 A 0.001 No 9. Euclid Street, North of Lincoln Ave 6 10,800 AM 3,120 0.289 A 3,120 0.289 A 0.000 No 10,800 PM 3,770 0.349 A 3,770 0.349 A 0.000 No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: V/C = volume-to-capacity 1 Link capacity determined from Equation 16-1 of the HCM. 2 Peak hour flow determined from study area peak hour intersection approach volumes at the downstream intersection. BOLD value indicates unsatisfactory LOS; BOLD indicates significant impact 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 159 Queuing Under General Plan Amendment plus Proposed Project conditions, all study area off-ramps are forecast to exceed some of the storage pocket lengths on the north- and southbound turn lanes on Euclid Street; and, the east- and westbound turn lanes on Lincoln Avenue at both ramp intersections as shown in Table 36 – General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Queuing Analysis. None of the off-ramp queues would exceed their storage pocket lengths with exception of the eastbound left- and right-turn lanes at Euclid Street/I-5 ramps (intersection #3), and the northbound right turn lane at I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue (intersection #11). While the PM peak hour queues of 426 feet and 416 feet for the eastbound left and right lanes, respectively, are forecast to continue to extend beyond the existing 400 foot storage lanes, the total length of the eastbound off-ramp is 1,900 feet at Euclid Street/I-5 ramps. Similarly, while the PM peak hour queues of 284 feet and 505 feet are forecast to continue to extend beyond the existing 195-foot storage lane at the northbound off-ramp at Lincoln Avenue, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,135 feet and the queues would not extend to the I-5 mainline lanes and impede mainline operations. Therefore, no impacts associated with General Plan Amendment Plus Proposed Project queuing would occur, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 160 Table 36 - General Plan Amendment (plus Project) Queuing Analysis No. Intersection Movement Pocket Length1 General Plan Amendment (plus Project)2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? AM PM AM PM 3 Euclid Street/I-5 Ramps NBL1 480 592 479 Yes No NBL2 480 598 519 Yes Yes NBR 145 147 107 Yes No SBL1 175 177 195 Yes Yes SBL2 200 185 201 No Yes SBR 280 225 216 No No EBL 400 249 426 No Yes4 EBLTR3 1,900 316 536 No No EBR 400 266 416 No Yes4 WBL 900 300 345 No No WBLTR3 1,450 382 432 No No WBR 425 346 402 No No 8 I-5 southbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue SBL1 1,185 172 299 No No SBL23 2,215 193 341 No No SBR 765 64 57 No No EBL1 270 342 274 Yes Yes EBL2 270 382 298 Yes Yes WBR 475 441 652 No Yes 11 I-5 northbound ramps/Lincoln Avenue NBL 500 367 505 No Yes5 NBTL3 1,135 450 604 No No NBR 195 271 284 Yes5 Yes5 EBL 250 310 331 Yes Yes EBTR 700 650 592 No No WBL1 130 181 151 Yes Yes WBL2 130 188 146 Yes Yes WBTR 825 290 408 No No Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: 1 Measured in feet. 2 Based on 95th percentile (design) queue length in SimTraffic 10. 3 Primarily offramp lane; approximate length measured from freeway mainline. 4. While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,900 feet, therefore queue would not impact the mainline lanes. 5. While queue exceeds storage lane, the total length of the off-ramp is 1,135 feet, therefore queue would not impact the mainline lanes. XX – Queue exceeds storage length. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 161 Intersection Queuing At the intersection of Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue, the 95th percentile (design) queue for the westbound left-turn lane exceeds the storage capacity in all analysis scenarios as shown in Table 37 - Project Access Intersection Queuing Analysis. Table 37 – Project Access Intersection Queuing Analysis No. Intersection Scenario Movement Pocket Length1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 95th Percentile Queue2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? 95th Percentile Queue2 Exceeds Turn Pocket Length? 6 Lincoln Avenue/ Loara Street Existing NBL 115 95 No 76 No EBR3 155 127 No 69 No WBL 60 90 Yes 101 Yes Existing plus Cumulative Projects (without Project) NBL 115 119 Yes 79 No EBR3 155 159 Yes 65 No WBL 60 97 Yes 96 Yes Existing plus Project NBL 115 114 No 83 No EBR3 155 136 No 57 No WBL 60 95 Yes 97 Yes Opening Year Baseline (without Project) NBL 115 116 Yes 87 No EBR3 155 194 Yes 73 No WBL 60 96 Yes 94 Yes Opening Year plus Project NBL 115 152 Yes 85 No EBR3 155 190 Yes 84 No WBL 60 98 Yes 96 Yes General Plan (current) Condition NBL 115 197 Yes 119 Yes EBR3 155 240 Yes 183 Yes WBL 60 99 Yes 86 Yes General Plan plus Shopoff Site (without Project) NBL 115 197 Yes 119 Yes EBR3 155 240 Yes 183 Yes WBL 60 99 Yes 86 Yes General Plan Amendment (plus Project) NBL 115 192 Yes 108 No EBR3 155 243 Yes 192 Yes WBL 60 97 Yes 86 Yes Source: Dudek 2019 Notes: 1 Measured in feet. 2 Based on 95th percentile (design) queue length in SimTraffic 10. 3 Measured from intersection to edge of driveway along Lincoln Avenue. XX – Queue exceeds storage length. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 162 Due to insufficient storage capacity for this movement, MM TRAF-1 would require the Property Owner/Developer to pay its fair share contribution to extend the westbound left-turn storage length an additional 45 feet (providing 105 feet total storage) east of the railroad crossing. MM TRAF-1: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall pay their equitable fair-share cost submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the westbound left-turn storage length an additional 45 feet east of the railroad crossing to provide 105 feet of total storage; • Add striping to designate the additional storage length for the westbound left-turn lane; • Relocate the railroad crossing arm onto the remaining median strip. The total improvement and fair-share costs shall be approved by the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The 95th percentile (design) queue for the northbound left-turn lane does not provide adequate storage capacity in all Opening Year and General Plan scenarios. MM TRAF-2 accommodates for the additional storage needed. The eastbound right turn movement at this intersection is impacted in the Existing plus Cumulative Projects, Opening Year, and General Plan conditions. As such, mitigation is provided to extend the eastbound right turn storage lane as detailed in MM TRAF-2. MM TRAF-2: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall pay their equitable fair-share cost submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the northbound left-turn storage lane by restriping an additional 85 feet of lane to the south to provide 200 feet total storage; • Restrict on-street parking along the eastern and western sides of Loara Street from Lincoln Avenue to the southern boundary of the Project Site by adding additional red curb striping and/or “no parking” signs; • Restripe Loara Street with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) from the end of the extended 200 foot northbound left turn lane to at least 100 feet south of its intersection with Embassy Street (the existing “KEEP CLEAR” pavement markings at Loara Street/Embassy Street intersection shall remain). Transitional striping shall be provided from the end of the TWLTL to the existing center lane striping beyond the southern boundary of the Project Site, and the exact lengths of striping will be determined through the street Improvement Plans; • Extend the eastbound right turn lane striping (current striping is approximately 90 feet in length) an additional 155 feet west of the driveway to provide 245 feet total storage (based on General Plan Amendment queuing). • Retain and extend existing red curb striping or “no parking” signs along the southern side of Lincoln Avenue for the 245-foot approach to the intersection. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 163 The total improvement and fair-share costs shall be approved by the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The on-street parking restriction and lane re-striping would ensure adequate line of sight for exiting vehicles from the Project Site driveway, and would also allow for ingress and egress of vehicles from the driveway when the railroad crossing is activated at the Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue intersection, which causes queuing to occur on Loara Street beyond the Project Site driveway. With these modifications, adequate storage length would be provided for the westbound and northbound left-turn lanes at Loara Street/Lincoln Avenue. Therefore, with implementation of MM TRAF-1 and MM TRAF-2, intersection queuing impacts associated with the Proposed Project would be less than significant. With implementation of MM TRAF-1 and MM TRAF-2, the Proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy that establishes measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the circulation system would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact: On December 28, 2018, updates to the CEQA Guidelines were approved by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). As part of the updates to the CEQA Guidelines, thresholds of significance for evaluation of impacts to transportation have changed. The CEQA Guidelines update eliminated the threshold of significance for evaluating impacts due to changes to air traffic patterns and consolidated the evaluation of impacts due to a conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs into an analysis of impacts due to a conflict with programs, plans, ordinances, or policies addressing the circulation system (i.e., new Threshold a.). However, new Threshold b. of the CEQA Guidelines for Transportation and Traffic requires an evaluation of impacts due to Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMTs), instead of evaluating impacts based on Level of Service (LOS) criteria, as required by California Senate Bill (SB) 743. LOS has been used as the basis for determining the significance of traffic impacts as standard practice in CEQA documents for decades. In 2013, SB 743 was passed, which is intended to balance the need for LOS for traffic planning with the need to build infill housing and mixed-use commercial developments within walking distance of mass transit facilities, downtowns, and town centers and to provide greater flexibility to local governments to balance these sometimes-competing needs. At full implementation of SB 743, the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) is expected to replace LOS as the metric against which traffic impacts are evaluated, with a metric based on VMTs. As a component of OPR’s revisions to the CEQA Guidelines in December 2018, lead agencies will be required to adopt VMT thresholds of significance by July 2020. At the time this Initial Study/MND was prepared, a VMT metric was not published by OPR, and the City of Anaheim in its capacity as Lead Agency, as well as surrounding local agencies in which the Proposed Project’s traffic would circulate, use LOS as the significance criteria for evaluating a 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 164 project’s traffic impacts. For this reason, a LOS metric and not a VMT metric is appropriately used in this Initial Study/MND. In late 2019, the 3rd District Court of Appeals ruled on Citizens for Positive Growth v. City of Sacramento regarding the use of delay and capacity-based metrics for transportation impacts. The ruling stated that under Section 21099, Subdivision (b)(2), existing law is that “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects. While the City does not currently have analysis thresholds for impacts using VMT, the court ruling states that agencies can no longer use delay or capacity metric to determine transportation impacts under CEQA. While the Proposed Project does not create a significant impact through LOS or delay per the City’s guidelines, for the purposes of this recent court decision, the Proposed Project was also screened for VMT analysis to be consistent with the recent court ruling. For the VMT screening analysis, the Proposed Project was analyzed using the example screening criteria identified in the “Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA”, dated December 2018 from the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). A projects proximity to high quality transit is one of the screening thresholds that could be used for determining if a VMT analysis is required. CEQA Section 15064.3, Subdivision (b)(1) states that lead agencies should generally presume that certain projects, including residential, will have a less than significant impact on VMT within one half mile of a fixed stop along a high-quality transit corridor. Public Resources Code 21155 defines a high-quality transit corridor as a fixed route bus corridor with headways of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. The Project Site is located approximately 1,300 feet from bus stops on Euclid Street at Lincoln Avenue. The peak hour headways for buses on Euclid Street are 15 minutes or less. Therefore, the Proposed Project was screened from a VMT analysis, and is presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT, per the OPR Technical Advisory. As a result, Appendix K provides analysis on potential transportation and traffic impacts associated with the Proposed Project, of which LOS is utilized. Therefore, transportation impacts are evaluated based on current City policy, and impacts associated with conflict or inconsistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(b) would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact: The Property Owner/Developer would be responsible for various on-site circulation improvements (driveways and internal drive aisles), as well as improvements to the public right- of-way to City standards. These on-site and adjacent improvements would be designed in accordance with all applicable design standards set forth by the City, which were established to ensure safe and efficient vehicular circulation on City roadway facilities. The City reviews all site plans to ensure that adequate line-of-sight is provided at all driveways, making sure that no structures or landscaping block the views of vehicles entering and exiting a site. As such, no sharp 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 165 curves, dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses would be introduced by the Proposed Project. The Project Site would be accessible through four (4) points of entry: two (2) along Lincoln Avenue and two (2) along Loara Street. However, only two of these four access areas would be utilized by residents and patrons, as they directly lead to the parking structure. The remaining two access points located at the western and southern most property lines are intended for emergency access. For parking and circulation within the proposed parking structure, each driveway would transition into an internal drive aisle that would connect in a manner for egress and ingress within the structure and provide access to the residential units, the leasing office, and retail commercial areas. Therefore, no impacts associated with hazardous design features or incompatible land uses would occur. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact: The Project Site would be accessible through four (4) points of entry: two (2) along Lincoln Avenue and two (2) along Loara Street. For parking and circulation within the proposed parking structure, each driveway would transition into an internal drive aisle that would connect in a manner for egress and ingress within the structure and provide access to the residential units, the leasing office, and retail commercial areas. The two access points located at the western and southern most property lines are intended for emergency access and would allow for emergency vehicles to access the Proposed Project. Figure 23 – Conceptual Fire Access Plan denotes areas of fire access lanes designed to meet 26-foot widths. The project proposes an area of enhanced fire protection to ensure the Proposed Project meets fire requirements. Fire separation walls, hose pulls, and roof access are also denoted on Figure 23. Each of the Proposed Project’s driveways would be designed and constructed to City standards and comply with City width, clearance, and turning-radius requirements. The Project Site would be accessible to emergency responders during construction and operation of the Proposed Project. Because of the Proposed Project’s multiple access driveways and because it would comply with all applicable local requirements related to emergency vehicle access and circulation, the Proposed Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, potential impacts associated with inadequate emergency access would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures MM TRAF-1: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall pay their equitable fair-share cost submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the westbound left-turn storage length an additional 45 feet east of the railroad crossing to provide 105 feet of total storage; • Add striping to designate the additional storage length for the westbound left-turn lane; • Relocate the railroad crossing arm onto the remaining median strip. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 166 The total improvement and fair-share costs shall be approved by the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. MM TRAF-2: Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the first building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall pay their equitable fair-share cost submit to the Public Works Department for review and approval of the street improvement plans for the following improvements: • Extend the northbound left-turn storage lane by restriping an additional 85 feet of lane to the south to provide 200 feet total storage; • Restrict on-street parking along the eastern and western sides of Loara Street from Lincoln Avenue to the southern boundary of the Project Site by adding additional red curb striping and/or “no parking” signs; • Restripe Loara Street with a two-way left-turn lane (TWLTL) from the end of the extended 200 foot northbound left turn lane to at least 100 feet south of its intersection with Embassy Street (the existing “KEEP CLEAR” pavement markings at Loara Street/Embassy Street intersection shall remain). Transitional striping shall be provided from the end of the TWLTL to the existing center lane striping beyond the southern boundary of the Project Site, and the exact lengths of striping will be determined through the street Improvement Plans; • Extend the eastbound right turn lane striping (current striping is approximately 90 feet in length) an additional 155 feet west of the driveway to provide 245 feet total storage (based on General Plan Amendment queuing). • Retain and extend existing red curb striping or “no parking” signs along the southern side of Lincoln Avenue for the 245-foot approach to the intersection. The total improvement and fair-share costs shall be approved by the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Transportation would be less than significant with the incorporation of MM TRAF-1 and MM TRAF-2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 167 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment was completed to determine potential impacts to cultural resources associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix B – Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project Anaheim, California, VCS Environmental, April 2019, Revised March 2020). A Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report was completed to determine potential impacts to historical resources associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix C – Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report for 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County, CA, Daly & Associates, April 2019). The City conducted tribal consultation in accordance with AB52 for CEQA projects, and with SB18 for the General Plan Amendment (Appendix L – AB52/SB18 Tribal Consultation, Sagecrest Planning + Environmental, January 2020) Environmental Analysis Effective July 1, 2015, Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) requires meaningful consultation with California Native American Tribes on potential impacts associated with tribal cultural resources, as defined in §21074. A tribe must submit a written request to the relevant lead agency if it wishes to be notified of projects within its traditionally and culturally affiliated area. The lead agency must provide written, formal notification to the tribes that have requested it within 14 days of determining that a project application is complete or deciding to undertake a project. The tribe must respond to the lead agency within 30 days of receipt of the notification if it wishes to engage in consultation on the project, and the lead agency must begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving the request for consultation. Consultation concludes when either 1) the parties agree to mitigation measures to avoid a significant effect, if one exists, on a tribal cultural 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 168 resource, or 2) a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that agreement cannot be reached. AB 52 also addresses confidentiality during tribal consultation per Public Resources Code §21082.3(c). The City of Anaheim has received notification requests from three Native American tribes, who were each notified of the Proposed Project in accordance with AB52. Senate Bill 18 (SB18) places requirements on local governments for developments within or near traditional tribal cultural places. SB18 requires local jurisdictions to provide opportunities for involvement of California Native American Tribes in the land-planning process for the purpose of preserving traditional tribal cultural places (TTCP). The Final Tribal Guidelines recommends that the NAHC provide written information as soon as possible but no later than 30 days after the receipt of the notification to inform the lead agency if the Proposed Project is determined to be in proximity to a TTCP, and another 90 days for tribes to respond to if they want to consult with the local government to determine whether the project would have an adverse impact on the TTCP. There is no statutory limit on the consultation duration. Forty-five days before the action is publicly considered by the local government council, the local government refers action to agencies, following the CEQA public review time frame. The CEQA public distribution list may include tribes listed by the NAHC who have requested consultation, or it may not. If the NAHC, the tribe, and interested parties agree upon the mitigation measures necessary for the Proposed Project, it would be included in the project’s environmental document. If both the lead agency and the tribe agree that adequate mitigation or preservation measures cannot be taken, then neither party is obligated to act. SB 18 requires a city or county to consult with the NAHC and any appropriate Native American tribe prior to the adoption, revision, amendment, or update of a city’s or county’s General Plan. In addition, SB 18 provides a new definition of TTCP that requires a traditional association of the site with Native American traditional beliefs, cultural practices, or ceremonies, or the site must be shown to actually have been used for activities related to traditional beliefs, cultural practices, or ceremonies. Previously, the site was defined to require only an association with traditional beliefs, practices, lifeways, and ceremonial activities. In addition, SB 18 law amended Civil Code Section 815.3 and added California Native American tribes to the list of entities that can acquire and hold conservation easements for the purpose of protecting their cultural places. a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in Section 4.5(a), there are no existing buildings or other cultural resources on the Project Site that are listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. None of the historic documents reviewed as part of Appendices B and C indicate that the Project Site is associated with any significant historical event. The records search from the SCCIC indicated that no cultural resources have been previously recorded on the Project Site. Therefore, substantial adverse impacts associated with historical resources listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or the Citywide Historic Preservation Plan would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 169 b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated: Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), signed into law in 2014, amended CEQA and established new requirements for tribal notification and consultation. AB 52 applies to all projects for which a notice of preparation or notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative declaration is issued after July 1, 2015. AB 52 also broadly defines a new resource category of tribal cultural resources and established a more robust process for meaningful consultation that includes: • Prescribed notification and response timelines; • Consultation on alternatives, resource identification, significance determinations, impact evaluation, and mitigation measures; and • Documentation of all consultation efforts to support CEQA findings. A tribe must submit a written request to the relevant lead agency if it wishes to be notified of projects within its traditionally and culturally affiliated area. The lead agency must provide written, formal notification to the tribes that have requested it within 14 days of determining that a project application is complete or deciding to undertake a project. The tribe must respond to the lead agency within 30 days of receipt of the notification if it wishes to engage in consultation on the Proposed Project, and the lead agency must begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving the request for consultation. Consultation concludes when either 1) the parties agree to mitigation measures to avoid a significant effect, if one exists, on a tribal cultural resource, or 2) a party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached. AB 52 also addresses confidentiality during tribal consultation per Public Resources Code §21082.3(c). AB52 Consultation The City of Anaheim received requests from three California Native American Tribes to be notified of projects in which the City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency under CEQA. The Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians and the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians – Acjachemen Nation were notified of the Proposed Project on August 1, 2018, and the 30-day notification period lapsed on August 31, 2018, with no response from either tribe. The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation was also notified of the Proposed Project on August 1, 2018 and requested consultation by letter on August 3, 2018. Consultation took place between the City and Chairman Andrew Salas via email and a phone conversation between October 30 and November 1, 2019. Chairman Salas indicated that the Project Site is in a sensitive area and grading activities may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. In order to avoid a potentially significant impact, Chairman Salas agreed with the implementation of MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2 and successfully concluding consultation. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 170 SB18 Consultation At the request of the City of Anaheim, NAHC provided a list of eight California Native American Tribes to be notified pursuant to SB18. The Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, Garbieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrielino/Tongva Nation, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation – Belardes, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians - Acjachemen Nation, Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, and Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation – Romero, were notified of the Proposed Project on August 21, 2018, and the 30-day notification period lapsed on September 19, 2018, with no response from any of the above listed tribes. The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation was also notified of the Proposed Project on August 21, 2018 and requested consultation by letter on August 22, 2018. Consultation took place between the City and Chairman Andrew Salas via email and a phone conversation between October 30 and November 1, 2019 resulted in Chairman Salas agreeing with the implementation of MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2 and successfully concluding consultation. There is little potential for the inadvertent discovery of intact subsurface archaeological deposits on the Project Site. Nonetheless, given that a cultural resources evaluation was likely not conducted when the Project Site was originally paved, the possibility exists, albeit remote, that tribal cultural resources of significance could be encountered during subsurface ground- disturbing activities. With the incorporation of MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2, potential impacts associated with tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures MM TCR-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the Project area. This list is provided by the NAHC. The Tribal monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The onsite monitoring shall end when the Project Site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the Project Site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, construction activities shall be ceased in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 171 activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the Property Owner/Developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Tribal Cultural Resources would be less than significant with the incorporation of MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 172 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ A Sewer Study was completed to determine potential impacts to sewers associated with the development of the Proposed Project (Appendix M – Sewer Study – 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Psomas, January 2017). Environmental Analysis a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Anaheim General Plan identifies an average household size of 3.4 persons. The Proposed Project would construct 315 residential units with 2,031 SF of leasing office and 3,413 SF of retail commercial spaces on a Project Site that is currently occupied by auto related facilities that includes an auto dealership with auto/recreational vehicle storage, sales lot, and repair facility. The Proposed Project would connect to existing water mains that are serviced by the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD), the water service provider for the City. Based on the City’s 2015 UWMP, the estimated water demand for 2020 is 62,050 afy or approximately 151 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). An estimated 1,071 new residents would result in a water demand of approximately 161,721 GPD or 181 afy. Under normal conditions, 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 173 the 2015 UWMP predicts total potable and raw water demand of 61,895 afy in 2020, and 66,910 afy in 2030. Of the total projected water supply of 62,050 afy in 2020 and 67,065 afy in 2030 under normal year conditions, 43,435 afy in 2020 and 46,946 afy in 2030 are estimated to be groundwater. The estimated water demand for the Proposed Project is 181 afy, which is nominal compared to the projected supply. The City would have enough water supply to service the Proposed Project. According to the UWMP, the City relies on approximately 70 percent groundwater from OCWD, and 30 percent imported water from MWD. The Proposed Project would be served by these sources. The City anticipates the same water supply mix to be available through 2040. With the projects and programs implemented by MWD, OCWD, and the City, water supplies are projected to meet full-service demands, through 2040 with an anticipated demand of 67,143 afy under normal year conditions. The water demand of the Proposed Project would account for approximately 0.2 percent of the City’s projected 2040 water demand. In addition, MWD’s 2015 UWMP found that it would be able to meet full-service demands of its member agencies from 2020 through 2040 during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years. The Proposed Project would use a relatively nominal percentage of the projected water supply available to the City in future year scenarios. The City can meet its water demand under multiple dry years with diversified supply and conservation measures. Therefore, with implementation of required water-saving measures, potential impacts associated with the construction or expansion of water facilities and would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. According to the Sewer Study (Appendix M), the Project Site would connect to the existing sewer running along Lincoln Avenue along the north side of the Project Site. The Proposed Project flow would be all be loaded to manhole SW054201. The entire sewer collection system discharges into the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Euclid Trunk Sewer. The existing uses on the Project Site are commercial land uses including auto sales and services. In researching the Combined West Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (CWAAMPSS) Second Revision dated March 2005, it was determined this small model basin was modeled incorrectly so a separate new model was created for Appendix M. The land use for this small study area was obtained from the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Plan dated November 23, 2016, from the City’s website. The Project Site and the entire tributary area to the downstream sewer is designated General Commercial so the acreage in the new model is designated as commercial land use for the Existing Condition Scenario at the appropriate manhole locations, on the existing 10-inch VCP sewer, running along Lincoln Avenue. As-built plans were researched to obtain pipeline diameters, slopes and lengths for this new model. Existing flow rates and those proposed are detailed in Appendix M, Table 1 – Existing and Proposed Manhole Flow Loading. Appendix M analyzed 368 residential (rental) dwelling units on the Project Site, with a flow generation factor of 210 gpd/dwelling unit, which results in a flow rate of 77,280 gpd of wastewater. The Proposed Project was subsequently reduced to 315 residential units with 3,413 SF of retail, which would result in a lower flow rate than what was analyzed in the Sewer Study. The increase flow is detailed in Appendix M, Table 2 – Existing and Proposed Flow Increases Due 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 174 to Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would result in an average flow increase of 68,236 gpd of wastewater. The Existing Condition Scenario plus the Proposed Project flows and depth- to-Diameter (d/D) ratios for the sewer collection system from the newly created hydraulic model are detailed in Appendix M, Table 3 – Existing Land Use Scenario Plus Project. The d/D deficiency criteria for pipes less than 12 inches in diameter is a ratio greater than 0.67. As shown, the greatest d/D ratio in any downstream sewer reach in the existing condition is 0.41. Therefore, the proposed additional flow does not trigger any capacity deficiencies in the downstream sewer collection system in the Existing Scenario plus the Proposed Project. The existing sewer collection system is projected to have enough capacity to serve the Proposed Project. Therefore, potential impacts associated with sewer capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Wastewater from the Proposed Project would enter the City’s sewer system and discharge into the manhole SW054201. According to the UWMP, wastewater generated by the Proposed Project would be treated at OCSD’s Reclamation Plant No. 1, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, which has a capacity of 320 million gallons per day (mgd), and Treatment Plant No. 2 located at 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach, which has a capacity of 312 mgd. The estimated average daily influent flow between both facilities is 185 mgd for 2018-2019, which is approximately 29% of the cumulative rated capacity for the facilities 30. The amount of wastewater generated by the Proposed Project is nominal compared to the average daily amount of wastewater treated by OCSD’s wastewater treatment facilities and their combined capacity. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the construction or expansion of water treatment facilities would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. As discussed in Section 4.10.1(a), the Proposed Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Project Site and the post-construction drainage pattern would remain the same as the preconstruction drainage pattern. However, new proposed drywells and a low flow subdrain system would be designed to temporarily store and infiltrate runoff, primarily from rooftops and another impervious area. The drywells would be used to treat stormwater runoff for water quality purposes. The Proposed Project would not increase the runoff from the site as the existing site is 95 percent impervious while Proposed Project includes a landscape area of more than 35,000 SF. Therefore, this development would not have a negative impact on downstream facilities. The proposed drywells and low flow subdrain system on the Project Site would retain and treat project run-off, therefore reducing flow rates from the pre-development condition. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the construction or expansion of storm water drainage would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Other utilities, such as electrical power and telecommunications, would be connected to existing infrastructure in the area, consistent with City and provider regulations. Therefore, potential 30 https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service Accessed September 25, 2019 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 175 impacts associated with the relocation or construction of utility systems would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less Than Significant Impact: According to the City’s General Plan, the City utilizes two primary sources of water supply: groundwater produced from City-owned wells and imported water from the MWD. Based on the City’s 2015 UWMP , the estimated water demand for 2020 is 62,050 afy or approximately 151 GPCD. An estimated 1,071 new residents would result in a water demand of approximately 161,721 GPD or 181 afy. Under normal conditions, the 2015 UWMP predicts total potable and raw water demand of 61,895 afy in 2020, and 66,910 afy in 2030. Of the total projected water supply of 62,050 afy in 2020 and 67,065 afy in 2030 under normal year conditions, 43,435 afy in 2020 and 46,946 afy in 2030 are estimated to be groundwater. The estimated water demand for the Proposed Project is 181 afy, which is nominal compared to the projected supply. The City would have enough water supply to service the Proposed Project. As defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15155, the Proposed Project is not a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units and would not be considered a water demand project. Water demand for the Proposed Project would equate to less than one percent of the total water supply. Based on the UWMP, it is not expected that expanded entitlements would be needed to provide water for the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts associated with water supply would occur and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact: Wastewater generated by the Proposed Project would be treated at the OCSD Reclamation Plant No. 1, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located at 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. Both OCSD facilities have design capacities that exceed their current utilization. The Proposed Project would generate approximately 77,280 gallons of wastewater per day (Appendix M). The amount of wastewater generated is nominal compared to the average daily amount of wastewater treated by OCSD’s wastewater facilities and its surplus capacity. Therefore, potential impacts associated with wastewater treatment capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 176 d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact: OC Waste & Recycling operates three active landfills in Orange County: Olinda Alpha Landfill near Brea; the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill near Irvine; and the Prima Deschecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. The Olinda Alpha Landfill is the closest facility to the Project Site and would most likely receive waste from the Proposed Project. This landfill has a daily maximum of 8,000 tons per day 31. The Proposed Project would construct 315 residential units and 5,444 SF of leasing office space on the Project Site with an estimated 1,071 residents. Using CalRecycle’s 2014 generation rate of 5.2 pounds per resident per day,32 the Proposed Project would generate approximately 5,569 pounds per day, or 2.7 tons per day of solid waste. According to OC Waste & Recycling, the Olinda Alpha Landfill received a daily average of 5,322 tons in 2013 and has an average residual capacity of 2,678 tons per day. The 2.7 tons per day of solid waste generated by the Proposed Project is nominal compared to Olinda Alpha Landfill’s average residual capacity of 2,678 tons per day. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not be served by a landfill with insufficient permitted capacity to accommodate solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, potential impacts associated with solid waste disposal would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed above, solid waste generated by the Proposed Project would be disposed of at one of the three landfills in Orange County. Disposal of solid waste would be required to comply with all federal state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. This would include providing receptacles for green waste, recyclables and garbage. Therefore, potential impacts associated with compliance with solid waste statutes and regulations would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Utilities and Service Systems apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Utilities and Service Systems would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 31 http://www.ocagcomm.com/gov/waste/landfill/active/olinda.asp Accessed September 25, 2019 32 CalRecycle, California’s 2014 Per Capita Disposal Rate; see: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/lgcentral/goalmeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default.htm 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 177 4.20 Wildfire Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water resources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐ d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ Environmental Analysis a) Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated in Section 4.9.1(f), the Proposed Project would not substantially impair the way emergency access is provided to the Project Site via West Lincoln Avenue or Loara Street. The closest emergency services facility is Fire Station no. 2 located approximately 1.1 miles northwest of the Project Site on Crescent Avenue, just west of I-5. The proposed on-site accessways meet the turning radii and street width requirements of the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department as shown on Figure 23 – Conceptual Fire Access Plan. The Proposed Project includes design features such as fire separation walls, areas of enhance fire protection, in addition to required 150-foot hose pulls. These standards would ensure adequate access within the Project Site for emergency response or evacuation plan. In addition, as part of the plan check process, the Project Site plan would undergo a fire, life, and safety review by the Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department (AFR) and Anaheim Police Department (APD) to ensure adequate infrastructure for emergency response and access. Therefore, potential impacts associated with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. b) Would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Less Than Significant Impact. Fires can occur in urban environments and can also impact unpopulated areas that may contain brush or grasslands. The central and western portions of Anaheim are highly urbanized and relatively built out, and the Hill and Canyon Area is approaching its buildout potential. As a result, the City must continue to address the growing need to defend both persons and property from urban and wildland fires. In urban areas, the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 178 effectiveness of fire protection efforts is based upon several factors, including the age of structures, efficiency of circulation routes that ultimately affect response times and availability of water resources to combat fires. As shown in Figure 2 – Project Vicinity Map, the Project Site is in the highly urbanized area of western Anaheim. Other factors contribute to the severity of fires including weather and winds. Specifically, winds commonly referred to as Santa Ana winds, which occur during fire season (typically from June to the first significant rain in November) are particularly significant. Such “fire weather” is characterized by several days of hot dry weather and high winds, resulting in low fuel moisture in vegetation. Properties within Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones have been identified by the City. As shown in Figure S-5 - Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, such areas include the ridgeline areas and undeveloped wildland areas located east of the Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway and south of the Riverside (SR-91) Freeway. All other areas within the City located east of the Costa Mesa (SR-55) Freeway, and south of the Riverside (SR-91) Freeway, are designated as a Special Protection Area. The City provides safeguards to prevent devastation from fires such as routine inspections of homes and the surrounding areas. The Project Site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as designated by the City. Additionally, the Proposed Project would adhere to the development standards outlined in both the 2019 Building Code and 2016 Fire Code, including the use of fire suppression devices such as fire sprinklers and incorporation of enhance fire protection building materials for portions of the project. Further, the Project Site is relatively flat, and does not contain significant slopes which could exacerbate wildland fire risk. Therefore, potential impacts due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, which exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water resources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is in a built-out area of the City and is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, with surrounding development and roadway infrastructure existing in place. The Proposed Project would not require infrastructure improvements that would exacerbate fire risk. Additionally, the Proposed Project would adhere to the development standards outlined in both the 2019 Building Code and 2019 Fire Code, including the use of fire suppression devices such as fire sprinklers and incorporation of enhance fire protection building materials for portions of the project. Impacts to the environment from the Proposed Project are detailed throughout the entirety of this document, and are either less than significant, or less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Therefore, potential impacts associated with the exacerbation of fire risk or result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 179 d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No Impact. The Project Site’s existing drainage sheet flows toward the east within the southern portion of the Project Site and to the north in the northern portion of the Project Site. Directly adjacent to the Project Site’s north and east boundary are Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street respectively. The current site drainage would not be altered significantly where drainage patters would change from their current directions. Additionally, the Project Site is relatively flat, with no substantial slopes on-site. Therefore, no impacts associated with the exposure of people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes would occur, and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Wildfire apply to the Proposed Project. Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated Wildfire risk would be less than significant and no mitigation would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 180 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance Does the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ b) Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ c) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: As previously described, the Proposed Project is an infill development project located in an urbanized area of the City and the Project Site is not within or adjacent to and would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. According to the Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (Appendix B), Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report (Appendix C) and Sacred Land File Search (Appendix L), no cultural resources have been recorded within the Project Site, and the Project Site does not contain any resources that are important to major periods of California history or prehistory. Although the Project Site does not contain any documented cultural resources, there is a possibility that undiscovered, buried resources (including paleontological and tribal cultural resources) might be encountered during construction. Therefore, implementation of MM CUL-1, MM GEO-1, MM TCR-1, and MM TCR-2 would reduce any potential impacts associated with any undiscovered resources to less than significant and ensure that the Proposed Project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 181 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: The Proposed Project would result in potentially significant project-specific impacts to air quality, cultural and paleontological resources, tribal cultural resources, noise, and traffic. However, MM AIR-1, MM AIR-2, MM CUL- 1, MM GEO-1, MM NOI-1, MM TRAF-1, MM TRAF-2, MM TCR-1, and MM TCR-2 would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. Furthermore, the Air Quality and Transportation analyses presented in Section 4.3 and Section 4.17, respectively, of this document considered cumulative impacts and determined that cumulative air and traffic impacts would less than significant with mitigation incorporated, as outlined in those sections. No additional mitigation measures would be required to reduce cumulative impacts to less than significant levels. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated: All potential impacts of the Proposed Project have been identified, and mitigation measures have been provided, where applicable, to reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Upon implementation of mitigation measures, the Proposed Project would not have the potential to result in substantial adverse impacts on human beings either directly or indirectly. No additional mitigation measures would be required. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 182 5 LIST OF PREPARERS Sagecrest Planning+Environmental Christine Saunders, Director, Environmental Services Veronica Morones, Planning Consultant Lindsay Ortega, AICP, Senior Project Manager Subconsultants Patrick Maxon, M.A., RPA - VCS Environmental Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. - Daly & Associates Michael Swan - Psomas Greg Tonkovich, AICP - Vista Environmental Brittany Knott - Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. Andrew Atry - Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. Paul Kim - Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. Mark Principe - Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. David Albus - Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. Patrick Keefe - Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. Debbie Scott - Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. Ramiro Vejar - Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. Samantha Fujita - Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. Joshua Cain - Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. A. Wahab Noori, PE - CEM Lab Corp. Dennis Pascua - Dudek City Staff Planning Services Division Joanne Hwang, AICP, Senior Planner Andy Uk, Associate Planner Development Services Division Esperanza Rios, Assistant Engineer Traffic Engineering Division David Kennedy, P.E., Associate Transportation Planner 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 183 6 REFERENCES Appendix A - Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis, November 2019 (Revised March 2020) Appendix B – Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project Anaheim, California, VCS Environmental, April 2019 (Revised March 2020) Appendix C – Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report for 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County, CA, Daly & Associates, April 2019 Appendix D – Geotechnical Due-Diligence Evaluation, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., October 2018 Appendix E – Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., May 2018 Appendix F - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., April 2017 Appendix G – Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., July 2017 Appendix H – Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., September 2019 Appendix I – Preliminary Hydrology Report, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., July 2019 Appendix J – Noise Impact Analysis 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, City of Anaheim, Vista Environmental, January 2020 (Revised March 2020) Appendix K – Traffic Impact Analysis 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments, City of Anaheim, Dudek, January 2020 (Revised April 2020) Appendix L - AB52/SB18 Tribal Consultation, Sagecrest Planning+Environmental, February 2020 Appendix M – Sewer Study – 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Psomas, January 2017 Airport Land Use Commission. Orange County Airport Planning Areas Certified 7/21/05. http://www.ocair.com/commissions/aluc/docs/airportlu.pdf California Department of Conservation. Agricultural Preserves 2004, Williamson Act Parcels, Orange County. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange_WA_03_04.pdf [PDF] (Accessed September 10, 2019). California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection. Orange County Important Farmland 2016. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/ora16.pdf [PDF] (Accessed September 10, 2019). California Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). Cortese List Data Resources. https://calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/ (Accessed September 24, 2019). CalRecycle. (2019). California’s 2014 Per Capita Disposal Rate. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/lgcentral/goalmeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default .htm (Accessed September 25, 2019). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 184 Center for Demographic Research, California State University Fullerton. (2019). Orange County Jurisdiction Demographics: Anaheim; http://www.fullerton.edu/cdr/_resources/pdf/progressreport/Anaheim.pdf [PDF] (Accessed September 10, 2019). City of Anaheim. (2019). Anaheim By the Numbers. https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/13910/Anaheim-Demographic- Profile?bidId= (Accessed September 24, 2019). City of Anaheim. (2016). 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/11777/Anaheim-UWMP-2016?bidId= (Accessed September 25, 2019). City of Anaheim. Anaheim Fire Department. (2008). Underground Storage Tank Removal Guidelines. Fire Prevention Bureau Specifications and Requirements. http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1371/UST-Removal-Guidelines?bidId= (Accessed September 24, 2019). City of Anaheim. (2019-20). Fire and Rescue organizational chart. http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1275/Organization-Chart-?bidId= (Accessed September 25, 2019). City of Anaheim. Anaheim Fire Department Website. Fire station locations. http://www.anaheim.net/650/Station-Locations (Accessed September 25, 2019). City of Anaheim. Anaheim Municipal Code, October 2018. City of Anaheim. Anaheim Police Department Website. Locations. https://www.anaheim.net/363/Locations Accessed September 25, 2019 City of Anaheim. City of Anaheim General Plan. May 2004. City of Anaheim. Library Website. Locations and Hours. https://www.anaheim.net/903/Locations-Hours (Accessed September 25, 2019). City of Anaheim. (2004). Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330 SCH #2003041105. Certified May 25, 2004. City of Anaheim. Community Services Website. Parks and Facilities. http://ca- anaheim.civicplus.com/916/Parks-Facilities (Accessed September 25, 2019). City of Anaheim. Property Information. Property Info. https://gis.anaheim.net/PropertyInfo/?APN=25009111 City of Anaheim. Anaheim Public Utilities Website. Drought Response FAQ. http://www.anaheim.net/2553/Drought-Response-FAQ (Accessed September 25, 2019). Ed-Data. (2019). Loara Elementary. School Summary. https://www.ed-data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Elementary/Loara-Elementary (Accessed September 25, 2019). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Mixed-Use Development Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page | 185 Ed-Data. (2019). Ball Junior High. School Summary. https://www.ed- data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Union-High/Ball-Junior-High (Accessed September 25, 2019). Ed-Data. (2019). Loara Highschool. School Summary. https://www.ed- data.org/school/Orange/Anaheim-Union-High/Loara-High Accessed (September 25, 2019). Orange County Sanitation District. Facts and Key Statistics. https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service (Accessed September 25, 2019). Orange County Water District. (2018). Orange County Water District Surface Water Recharge Facilities. https://www.ocwd.com/media/6750/surfacewaterrechargefacilities.pdf (Accessed September 25, 2019) Orange County Waste and Recycling. Olinda Customer Information. http://www.ocagcomm.com/gov/waste/landfill/active/olinda.asp (Accessed September 25, 2019). US Geological Survey. Education. Earthquake Hazards. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/seiche.php (Accessed September 25, 2019) US Geological Survey. (2015). US Topo. https://prd-tnm.s3.amazonaws.com/StagedProducts/Maps/USTopo/PDF/CA/CA_Anaheim_20150310_TM_geo.pdf 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix A Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis March 2020 AIR QUALITY, ENERGY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE APARTMENTS PROJECT CITY OF ANAHEIM Lead Agency: City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Prepared by: Vista Environmental 1021 Didrickson Way Laguna Beach, California 92651 949 510 5355 Greg Tonkovich, AICP Project No. 19006 March 4, 2020 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Site Location and Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Project Description .................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Project ......................................................................... 3 2.0 Air Pollutants ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Criteria Pollutants and Ozone Precursors .................................................................................. 7 2.2 Other Pollutants of Concern ...................................................................................................... 9 3.0 Greenhouse Gases ................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 Greenhouse Gases ................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Global Warming Potential ........................................................................................................ 14 3.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ...................................................................................... 15 4.0 Air Quality Management ....................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Federal – United States Environmental Protection Agency..................................................... 16 4.2 State – California Air Resources Board .................................................................................... 19 4.3 Regional – Southern California ................................................................................................ 21 4.4 Local – City of Anaheim ............................................................................................................ 23 5.0 Global Climate Change Management ..................................................................................... 25 5.1 International ............................................................................................................................ 25 5.2 Federal – United States Environmental Protection Agency..................................................... 25 5.3 State ......................................................................................................................................... 26 5.3 Regional – Southern California ................................................................................................ 32 5.4 Local – City of Anaheim ............................................................................................................ 33 6.0 Atmospheric Setting .............................................................................................................. 35 6.1 South Coast Air Basin ............................................................................................................... 35 6.2 Local Climate ............................................................................................................................ 35 6.3 Monitored Local Air Quality ..................................................................................................... 36 6.4 Toxic Air Contaminant Levels in the Air Basin ......................................................................... 38 7.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions ................................................................................. 39 7.1 CalEEMod Model Input Parameters ........................................................................................ 39 7.2 AERMOD Model Input Parameters .......................................................................................... 43 7.3 Energy Use Calculations ........................................................................................................... 46 8.0 Thresholds of Significance ...................................................................................................... 51 8.1 Regional Air Quality ................................................................................................................. 51 8.2 Local Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 51 8.3 Toxic Air Contaminants ............................................................................................................ 52 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED 8.4 Odor Impacts ............................................................................................................................ 52 8.5 Energy Conservation ................................................................................................................ 52 8.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................................................................................... 53 9.0 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 55 9.1 CEQA Thresholds of Significance.............................................................................................. 55 9.2 Air Quality Compliance ............................................................................................................ 55 9.3 Cumulative Net Increase in Non‐Attainment Pollution ........................................................... 57 9.4 Sensitive Receptors .................................................................................................................. 64 9.5 Odor Emissions Adversely Affecting a Substantial Number of People .................................... 70 9.6 Energy Consumption ................................................................................................................ 71 9.7 Energy Plan Consistency .......................................................................................................... 75 9.8 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................................... 75 9.9 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency ........................................................................................... 76 10.0 References ............................................................................................................................. 78 APPENDIX Appendix A – CalEEMod Model Daily Prior to Mitigation Printouts Appendix B – EMFAC2017 Model Printouts Appendix C – CalEEMod Model Daily Mitigated Printouts Appendix D – AERMOD Model Prior to Mitigation DPM Concentration Printouts Appendix E – AERMOD Model Mitigated DPM Concentration Printouts Appendix F – CalEEMod Model Annual Printouts 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Project Local Study Area .............................................................................................................. 5 Figure 2 – Proposed Site Plan ....................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3 – Air Dispersion Model Emission Sources and Receptor Locations .............................................. 50 LIST OF TABLES Table A – Diesel Emission Pollutants that Cause Acute and Chronic Health Impacts ................................ 10 Table B – Global Warming Potentials, Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs ......................... 14 Table C – State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards ........................................................................... 17 Table D – South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status .................................................................................... 18 Table E – Monthly Climate Data ................................................................................................................. 36 Table F – Local Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary ............................................................................... 37 Table G – CalEEMod Land Use Parameters ................................................................................................. 39 Table H – Project Daily Trip Rates and Total Project Generated Trips ....................................................... 42 Table I – Project Construction Haul and Material Delivery Truck Trips ...................................................... 45 Table J – Construction‐Related Truck Travel Emissions Rates used in the AERMOD Model ...................... 46 Table K – Off‐Road Equipment and Fuel Consumption from Construction of the Proposed Project ......... 47 Table L – On‐Road Vehicle Trips and Fuel Consumption from Construction of the Proposed Project ...... 48 Table M – SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance ............................... 51 Table N – SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance ............................................................... 52 Table O – Construction‐Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation ....................... 58 Table P – Mitigated Construction‐Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ...................................... 59 Table Q – Construction‐Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions ........................................................... 60 Table R – Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ..................................................................... 61 Table S – Project’s Contribution to Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin .................................. 62 Table T – Operations‐Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions ............................................................... 63 Table U – Cancer Risk Calculation Parameters ........................................................................................... 65 Table V – Construction‐Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation ............. 66 Table W – Mitigated Construction‐Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors .......................... 67 Table X – Proposed Project Compliance with the General Plan Energy Conservation Policies .................. 75 Table Y – Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions .................................................................... 76 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AB Assembly Bill Air Basin South Coast Air Basin AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BACT Best Available Control Technology BSFC Brake Specific Fuel Consumption CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CCAA California Clean Air Act CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFCs chlorofluorocarbons Cf4 tetrafluoromethane C2F6 hexafluoroethane C2H6 ethane CH4 Methane City City of Anaheim CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent CPUC California Public Utilities Commission DPM Diesel particulate matter EPA Environmental Protection Agency ºF Fahrenheit FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program GHG Greenhouse gas GWP Global warming potential HAP Hazardous Air Pollutants HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page v IPCC International Panel on Climate Change kWhr kilowatt‐hour LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard LST Localized Significant Thresholds MATES Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization MSAT Mobile Source Air Toxics MWh Megawatt‐hour NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NOx Nitrogen oxides NO2 Nitrogen dioxide O3 Ozone OPR Office of Planning and Research Pb Lead Pfc Perfluorocarbons PM Particle matter PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter PPM Parts per million PPB Parts per billion PPT Parts per trillion RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SB Senate Bill SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride SIP State Implementation Plan SOx Sulfur oxides TAC Toxic air contaminants UNFCCC United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change VOC Volatile organic compounds 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives This Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions, and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Impact Analysis has been completed to determine the air quality, energy, GHG emissions, and HRA impacts associated with the proposed 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments project (proposed project). The following is provided in this report: A description of the proposed project; A description of the atmospheric setting; A description of the criteria pollutants and GHGs; A description of the air quality regulatory framework; A description of the GHG emissions regulatory framework; A description of the air quality, energy, GHG emissions, and toxic air contaminant (TAC) thresholds including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) significance thresholds; An analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP); An analysis of the short‐term construction related and long‐term operational air quality, energy, and GHG emissions impacts; An analysis of the cancer and non‐cancer risks (acute and chronic) from construction emissions created by the proposed project and from existing nearby sources of TAC emissions to the proposed residents; and An analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with all applicable energy and GHG emissions reduction plans and policies. 1.2 Site Location and Study Area The project site is located in the City of Anaheim (City) on the southwest corner of the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. The approximately 5.25‐acre project site is currently utilized as an auto dealership with service center and is bounded by Lincoln Avenue and commercial uses to the north, Loara Street and commercial and industrial uses to the east, a school and office uses to the south, and multi‐ family homes and auto repair uses to the west. The project local study area is shown in Figure 1. Sensitive Receptors in Project Vicinity The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School that is located adjacent to the south side of the project site. 1.3 Proposed Project Description The proposed project consists of demolition of the existing auto dealership and construction of a mixed‐ use development that would include a 4‐story, 381,525 square foot mixed‐use building of which 378,112 square feet would be utilized for residential uses and would include 315 residential apartment units and 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 2 a 2,031 square foot leasing office. The remaining 3,413 square feet of the mixed‐use building would be utilized as retail space. A 5‐level 239,072 square foot parking structure would be constructed in the center of the mixed‐use building and would contain 639 parking spaces of which 19 parking spaces would have electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces would be designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. The proposed project would also include landscaped courtyards, pool and spa area and fitness center. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. 1.4 Executive Summary Standard Air Quality, Energy, and GHG Regulatory Conditions The proposed project will be required to comply with the following regulatory conditions from the SCAQMD and State of California (State). South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules The following lists the SCAQMD rules that are applicable, but not limited to the proposed project. Rule 402 Nuisance – Controls the emissions of odors and other air contaminants; Rule 403 Fugitive Dust – Controls the emissions of fugitive dust; Rule 445 Wood Burning Devices – Controls the emissions from fire places and fire pits; Rules 1108 and 1108.1 Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt – Controls the VOC content in asphalt; Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings – Controls the VOC content in paints and solvents; and Rule 1143 Paint Thinners – Controls the VOC content in paint thinners; State of California Rules The following lists the State of California Code of Regulations (CCR) air quality emission rules that are applicable, but not limited to the proposed project. CCR Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 – In use Off‐Road Diesel Vehicles; CCR Title 13, Section 2025 – On‐Road Diesel Truck Fleets; CCR Title 24 Part 6 – California Building Energy Standards; and CCR Title 24 Part 11 – California Green Building Standards. Summary of Analysis Results The following is a summary of the proposed project’s impacts with regard to the State CEQA Guidelines air quality, energy, and GHG emissions checklist questions. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 have been provided to reduce this impact to less than significant levels. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 3 Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non‐attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 have been provided to reduce this impact to less than significant levels. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measure 2 has been provided to reduce this impact to less than significant levels. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than significant impact. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; Less than significant impact. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy; Less than significant impact. Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than significant impact. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs? Less than significant impact. 1.5 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Project This analysis found that implementation of the State and SCAQMD air quality, energy, GHG, and TAC emissions reductions regulations listed above as well as implementation of the following mitigation would limit criteria pollutants, TAC, odors, energy consumption, and GHG emissions from the proposed project to less than significant levels. Mitigation Measure 1 For the interior areas of the residential portion of the proposed project, the project applicant shall require that the painting contractor utilize “Super‐Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113. A list of “Super‐Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules‐compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural‐coatings/super‐ compliant‐coatings 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 4 Mitigation Measure 2 The project applicant shall require that all off‐road diesel‐powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards. Fi g u r e 1 Pr o j e c t L o c a l S t u d y A r e a SO U R C E : G o o g l e M a p s . Pr o j e c t S i t e N Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan SOURCE: Architects Orange. N 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 7 2.0 AIR POLLUTANTS Air pollutants are generally classified as either criteria pollutants or non‐criteria pollutants. Federal ambient air quality standards have been established for criteria pollutants, whereas no ambient standards have been established for non‐criteria pollutants. For some criteria pollutants, separate standards have been set for different periods. Most standards have been set to protect public health. For some pollutants, standards have been based on other values (such as protection of crops, protection of materials, or avoidance of nuisance conditions). A summary of federal and state ambient air quality standards is provided in the Regulatory Framework section. 2.1 Criteria Pollutants and Ozone Precursors The criteria pollutants consist of: ozone, NOx, CO, SOx, lead (Pb), and particulate matter (PM). The ozone precursors consist of NOx and VOC. These pollutants can harm your health and the environment, and cause property damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calls these pollutants “criteria” air pollutants because it regulates them by developing human health‐based and/or environmentally‐based criteria for setting permissible levels. The following provides descriptions of each of the criteria pollutants and ozone precursors. Nitrogen Oxides Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) is the generic term for a group of highly reactive gases which contain nitrogen and oxygen. While most NOx are colorless and odorless, concentrations of NO2 can often be seen as a reddish‐ brown layer over many urban areas. NOx form when fuel is burned at high temperatures, as in a combustion process. The primary manmade sources of NOx are motor vehicles, electric utilities, and other industrial, commercial, and residential sources that burn fuel. NOx reacts with other pollutants to form, ground‐level ozone, nitrate particles, acid aerosols, as well as NO2, which cause respiratory problems. NOx and the pollutants formed from NOx can be transported over long distances, following the patterns of prevailing winds. Therefore, controlling NOx is often most effective if done from a regional perspective, rather than focusing on the nearest sources. Ozone Ozone is not usually emitted directly into the air but in the vicinity of ground‐level is created by a chemical reaction between NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, gasoline vapors, chemical solvents as well as natural sources emit NOx and VOC that help form ozone. Ground‐level ozone is the primary constituent of smog. Sunlight and hot weather cause ground‐level ozone to form with the greatest concentrations usually occurring downwind from urban areas. Ozone is subsequently considered a regional pollutant. Ground‐level ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and can cause substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. Because NOx and VOC are ozone precursors, the health effects associated with ozone are also indirect health effects associated with significant levels of NOx and VOC emissions. Carbon Monoxide Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas that is formed when carbon in fuel is not burned completely. It is a component of motor vehicle exhaust, which contributes approximately 56 percent of all CO emissions nationwide. In cities, 85 to 95 percent of all CO emissions may come from motor vehicle exhaust. Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes (such as metals processing and 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 8 chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires. Woodstoves, gas stoves, cigarette smoke, and unvented gas and kerosene space heaters are indoor sources of CO. The highest levels of CO in the outside air typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion conditions are more frequent. The air pollution becomes trapped near the ground beneath a layer of warm air. CO is described as having only a local influence because it dissipates quickly. Since CO concentrations are strongly associated with motor vehicle emissions, high CO concentrations generally occur in the immediate vicinity of roadways with high traffic volumes and traffic congestion, active parking lots, and in automobile tunnels. Areas adjacent to heavily traveled and congested intersections are particularly susceptible to high CO concentrations. CO is a public health concern because it combines readily with hemoglobin and thus reduces the amount of oxygen transported in the bloodstream. The health threat from lower levels of CO is most serious for those who suffer from heart disease such as angina, clogged arteries, or congestive heart failure. For a person with heart disease, a single exposure to CO at low levels may cause chest pain and reduce that person’s ability to exercise; repeated exposures may contribute to other cardiovascular effects. High levels of CO can affect even healthy people. People who breathe high levels of CO can develop vision problems, reduced ability to work or learn, reduced manual dexterity, and difficulty performing complex tasks. At extremely high levels, CO is poisonous and can cause death. Sulfur Oxides Sulfur Oxide (SOx) gases are formed when fuel containing sulfur, such as coal and oil is burned, as well as from the refining of gasoline. SOx dissolves easily in water vapor to form acid and interacts with other gases and particles in the air to form sulfates and other products that can be harmful to people and the environment. Lead Lead is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been motor vehicles and industrial sources. Due to the phase out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is now the primary source of lead emissions to the air. High levels of lead in the air are typically only found near lead smelters, waste incinerators, utilities, and lead‐acid battery manufacturers. Exposure of fetuses, infants and children to low levels of Pb can adversely affect the development and function of the central nervous system, leading to learning disorders, distractibility, inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased lead levels are associated with increased blood pressure. Particulate Matter Particle matter (PM) is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air. PM is made up of a number of components including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10) that are also known as Respirable Particulate Matter are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) that are also known as Fine Particulate Matter have been designated as a subset of PM10 due to their increased negative health impacts and its ability to remain suspended in the air longer and travel further. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 9 Volatile Organic Compounds Hydrocarbons are organic gases that are formed from hydrogen and carbon and sometimes other elements. Hydrocarbons that contribute to formation of O3 are referred to and regulated as VOCs (also referred to as reactive organic gases). Combustion engine exhaust, oil refineries, and fossil‐fueled power plants are the sources of hydrocarbons. Other sources of hydrocarbons include evaporation from petroleum fuels, solvents, dry cleaning solutions, and paint. VOC is not classified as a criteria pollutant, since VOCs by themselves are not a known source of adverse health effects. The primary health effects of VOCs result from the formation of O3 and its related health effects. High levels of VOCs in the atmosphere can interfere with oxygen intake by reducing the amount of available oxygen through displacement. Carcinogenic forms of hydrocarbons, such as benzene, are considered toxic air contaminants (TACs). There are no separate health standards for VOCs as a group. 2.2 Other Pollutants of Concern Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to the above‐listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. TACs is a term that is defined under the California Clean Air Act and consists of the same substances that are defined as Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) in the Federal Clean Air Act. There are over 700 hundred different types of TACs with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of TACs include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least 40 different toxic air contaminants. The most important of these TACs, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3‐butadiene, and acetaldehyde. Public exposure to TACs can result from emissions from normal operations as well as from accidental releases. Health effects of TACs include cancer, birth defects, neurological damage, and death. TACs are less pervasive in the urban atmosphere than criteria air pollutants, however they are linked to short‐term (acute) or long‐term (chronic or carcinogenic) adverse human health effects. There are hundreds of different types of TACs with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of TACs include industrial processes, commercial operations (e.g., gasoline stations and dry cleaners), and motor vehicle exhaust. According to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, the majority of the estimated health risk from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important of which is DPM. DPM is a subset of PM2.5 because the size of diesel particles are typically 2.5 microns and smaller. The identification of DPM as a TAC in 1998 led the CARB to adopt the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel‐fueled Engines and Vehicles in September 2000. The plan’s goals are a 75‐percent reduction in DPM by 2010 and an 85‐percent reduction by 2020 from the 2000 baseline. Diesel engines emit a complex mixture of air pollutants, composed of gaseous and solid material. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust are known as particulate matter or PM, which includes carbon particles or “soot.” Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and over 40 other cancer‐causing substances. California’s identification of DPM as a toxic air contaminant was based on its potential to cause cancer, premature deaths, and other health problems. Exposure to DPM is a health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. Overall, diesel engine emissions are responsible for the majority of California’s potential airborne cancer risk from combustion sources. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 10 The various pollutants within DPM that also cause acute and chronic health impacts are detailed below in Table A. Table A was developed through crosschecking all diesel emissions pollutants provided in San Diego Air Pollutant Control District’s (SDAPCD) Diesel Fired Engines Emissions Factor Table to the list of acute and chronic reference exposure levels provided at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/allrels.html. According to the California Office of Environmental Health and Hazards Assessment (OEHHA), no acute risk had been found to be directly created from DPM, so there is no acute AREL assigned to DPM. However, as detailed in Table A, other TAC emissions associated with diesel exhaust do have an acute REL assigned to them. In order to account for the acute risk from all TAC emissions associated with diesel emissions, a hypothetical acute REL was calculated for DPM through multiplying each TAC with an acute REL to its diesel weight fraction and then adding together the results, which resulted in a hypothetical acute AREL of 2,189 for diesel emissions. Table A – Diesel Emission Pollutants that Cause Acute and Chronic Health Impacts TAC TAC Potency Factors (µg/m3)1 Percent of DPM Emission Rate3 Target Organ Systems Acute REL2 Chronic REL 1,3‐Butadiene 660 140 0.51% Development Acetaldehyde 470 140 1.84% Eyes, respiratory system (sensory irritation) Acrolein 2.5 0.35 0.08% Eyes, respiratory system Arsenic 0.2 0.015 0.004% Reproductive/developmental, cardiovascular system, nervous system Benzene 27 3 0.44% Hematologic system, immune system, reproductive/developmental Cadmium ‐‐ 0.02 0.004% kidney, respiratory system Chlorobenzene ‐‐ 1,000 0.0005% Eyes, respiratory system Chromium (hexavalent) ‐‐ 0.2 0.001% Respiratory system, hematologic system Copper 100 ‐‐ 0.01% Respiratory system Ethyl benzene ‐‐ 5 0.03% Liver, kidney, developmental Formaldehyde 55 9 4.07% Eyes, immune system, respiratory Hexane ‐‐ 200 0.06% Nervous system Hydrogen Chloride 2,100 9 0.44% Eyes, respiratory system Manganese ‐‐ 0.09 0.01% Nervous system Mercury 0.6 0.03 0.005% Reproductive/developmental Naphthalene ‐‐ 9 0.05% Respiratory system Nickel 0.2 002 0.01% Immune system, respiratory system Propylene ‐‐ 3000 1.10% Respiratory System Selenium ‐‐ 20 0.01% Liver, cardiovascular system, nervous system Toluene 37000 300 0.25% Nervous system, eyes, respiratory system, reproductive/developmental Xylene 22000 700 0.10% Eyes, nervous and respiratory systems DPM ‐‐ 5 ‐‐ Respiratory system Notes: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 11 1 Potency factors obtained from: http://www.oehha.ca.gov/risk/ChemicalDB/index.asp 2 REL = Reference Exposure Level 3 Percentage of DPM Emission Rate calculated by dividing the pollutant’s pounds per 1,000 gallons rate by the PM2.5 pounds per 1,000 gallons rate provided by the SDAPCD Sources: SDAPCD, 2011 and OEHHA, 2014. Asbestos Asbestos is listed as a TAC by CARB and as a HAP by the EPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other means, can release asbestiform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of asbestos‐containing materials, road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining. The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. The nearest likely locations of naturally occurring asbestos, as identified in the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California, prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology, is located in Santa Barbara County. The nearest historic asbestos mine to the project site, as identified in the Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences of Asbestos in California, prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, is located at Asbestos Mountain, which is approximately 85 miles east of the project site in the San Jacinto Mountains. Due to the distance to the nearest natural occurrences of asbestos, the project site is not likely to contain asbestos. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 12 3.0 GREENHOUSE GASES 3.1 Greenhouse Gases Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the Earth’s surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Emissions of CO2 and N2O are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off‐gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. Water Vapor Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warmer, the relative humidity can be higher (in essence, the air is able to “hold” more water when it is warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a “positive feedback loop.” The extent to which this positive feedback loop will continue is unknown as there is also dynamics that put the positive feedback loop in check. As an example, when water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth’s surface and heat it up). Carbon Dioxide The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Since the industrial revolution began in the mid 1700s, each of these activities has increased in scale and distribution. CO2 was the first GHG demonstrated to be increasing in atmospheric concentration with the first conclusive measurements being made in the last half of the 20th century. Prior to the industrial revolution, concentrations were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) indicates that concentrations were 379 ppm in 2005, an increase of more than 30 percent. Left unchecked, the IPCC projects that concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is projected to increase to a minimum of 540 ppm by 2100 as a direct result of anthropogenic sources. This 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 13 could result in an average global temperature rise of at least two degrees Celsius or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Methane CH4 is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Its lifetime in the atmosphere is brief (10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs (such as CO2, N2O, and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)). CH4 has both natural and anthropogenic sources. It is released as part of the biological processes in low oxygen environments, such as in swamplands or in rice production (at the roots of the plants). Over the last 50 years, human activities such as growing rice, raising cattle, using natural gas, and mining coal have added to the atmospheric concentration of methane. Other anthropocentric sources include fossil‐fuel combustion and biomass burning. Nitrous Oxide Concentrations of N2O also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998, the global concentration of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion (ppb). N2O is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel‐fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions) also contribute to its atmospheric load. N2O is also commonly used as an aerosol spray propellant (i.e., in whipped cream bottles, in potato chip bags to keep chips fresh, and in rocket engines and race cars). Chlorofluorocarbons CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the Earth’s surface). CFCs have no natural source, but were first synthesized in 1928. They were used for refrigerants, aerosol propellants, and cleaning solvents. Due to the discovery that they are able to destroy stratospheric ozone, a global effort to halt their production was undertaken and in 1989 the European Community agreed to ban CFCs by 2000 and subsequent treaties banned CFCs worldwide by 2010. This effort was extremely successful, and the levels of the major CFCs are now remaining level or declining. However, their long atmospheric lifetimes mean that some of the CFCs will remain in the atmosphere for over 100 years. Hydrofluorocarbons HFCs are synthetic man‐made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured atmospheric abundances are (in order), HFC‐23 (CHF3), HFC‐134a (CF3CH2F), and HFC‐152a (CH3CHF2). Prior to 1990, the only significant emissions were HFC‐23. HFC‐134a use is increasing due to its use as a refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC‐23 and HFC‐134a in the atmosphere are now about 10 parts per trillion (ppt) each. Concentrations of HFC‐152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade for applications such as automobile air conditioners and refrigerants. Perfluorocarbons Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High‐energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth’s surface are able to destroy the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and hexafluoroethane (C2F6). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 14 Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. Sulfur Hexafluoride Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warming potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. Aerosols Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light. Cloud formation can also be affected by aerosols. Sulfate aerosols are emitted when fuel containing sulfur is burned. Black carbon (or soot) is emitted during biomass burning due to the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Particulate matter regulation has been lowering aerosol concentrations in the United States; however, global concentrations are likely increasing. 3.2 Global Warming Potential GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The GWP is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere; it is the cumulative radiative forcing effects of a gas over a specified time horizon resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to the reference gas, CO2. The GHGs listed by the IPCC and the CEQA Guidelines are discussed in this section in order of abundance in the atmosphere. Water vapor, the most abundant GHG, is not included in this list because its natural concentrations and fluctuations far outweigh its anthropogenic (human‐made) sources. To simplify reporting and analysis, GHGs are commonly defined in terms of their GWP. The IPCC defines the GWP of various GHG emissions on a normalized scale that recasts all GHG emissions in terms of CO2e. As such, the GWP of CO2 is equal to 1. The GWP values used in this analysis are based on the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, which are used in CARB’s 2014 Scoping Plan Update and the CalEEMod Model Version 2016.3.2 and are detailed in Table B. The IPCC has updated the Global Warming Potentials of some gases in their Fifth Assessment Report, however the new values have not yet been incorporated into the CalEEMod model that has been utilized in this analysis. Table B – Global Warming Potentials, Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs Gas Atmospheric Lifetime (years)1 Global Warming Potential (100 Year Horizon)2 Atmospheric Abundance Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 50‐200 1 379 ppm Methane (CH4) 9‐15 25 1,774 ppb Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 114 298 319 ppb HFC‐23 270 14,800 18 ppt HFC‐134a 14 1,430 35 ppt HFC‐152a 1.4 124 3.9 ppt PFC: Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) 50,000 7,390 74 ppt PFC: Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) 10,000 12,200 2.9 ppt Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) 3,200 22,800 5.6 ppt Notes: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 15 1 Defined as the half‐life of the gas. 2 Compared to the same quantity of CO2 emissions and is based on the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 standard, which is utilized in CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2),that is used in this report (CalEEMod user guide: Appendix A). Definitions: ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; ppt = parts per trillion Source: IPCC 2007, EPA 2015 3.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory According to https://cdiac.ess‐dive.lbl.gov/trends/emis/tre_glob_2014.html 9,855 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions were created globally in the year 2014. According to https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global‐greenhouse‐gas‐emissions‐data the breakdown of global GHG emissions by sector consists of: 25 percent from electricity and heat production; 21 percent from industry; 24 percent from agriculture, forestry and other land use activities; 14 percent from transportation; 6 percent from building energy use; and 10 percent from all other sources of energy use. According to Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990‐2016, prepared by EPA, in 2016 total U.S. GHG emissions were 6,511.3 million metric tons (MMT) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) emissions. Total U.S. emissions have increased by 2.4 percent between 1990 and 2016 and GHG emissions decreased by 1.9 percent between 2015 and 2016. The recent decrease in GHG emissions was a result of multiple factors, including substitution from coal to natural gas in the electricity sector and from a warmer winter and a slow‐down in the economy in 2016. However, according to https://rhg.com/research/preliminary‐ us‐emissions‐estimates‐for‐2018/ the preliminary estimates for 2018 show that GHG emissions have increased by 3.4 percent, which is primarily a result from a strong economy that required the use of more transportation fuels and power generation. According to https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm the State of California created 429.4 MMTCO2e in 2016. The breakdown of California GHG emissions by sector consists of: 41 percent from transportation; 23 percent from industrial; 16 percent from electricity generation; 8 percent from agriculture; 7 percent from residential buildings; 5 percent from commercial buildings; and 1 percent from other uses of energy. In 2016, GHG emissions were 12 MMTCO2e lower than 2015 levels, which represent a 6 percent year‐over‐year decline. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 16 4.0 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT The air quality at the project site is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to improve air quality through legislation, regulations, planning, policy‐making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for improving the air quality are discussed below. 4.1 Federal – United States Environmental Protection Agency The Clean Air Act, first passed in 1963 with major amendments in 1970, 1977 and 1990, is the overarching legislation covering regulation of air pollution in the United States. The Clean Air Act has established the mandate for requiring regulation of both mobile and stationary sources of air pollution at the state and federal level. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created in 1970 in order to consolidate research, monitoring, standard‐setting and enforcement authority into a single agency. The EPA is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for atmospheric pollutants. It regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain locomotives. NAAQS pollutants were identified using medical evidence and are shown below in Table C. As part of its enforcement responsibilities, the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The SIP must integrate federal, state, and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to reduce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market‐ based programs within the timeframe identified in the SIP. The CARB defines attainment as the category given to an area with no violations in the past three years. As indicated below in Table D, the Air Basin has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non‐attainment area for ozone and PM2.5 and partial non‐attainment for lead. Currently, the Air Basin is in attainment with the national ambient air quality standards for CO, PM10, SO2, and NO2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 17 Table C – State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards Air Pollutant Concentration / Averaging Time Most Relevant Effects California Standards Federal Primary Standards Ozone (O3) 0.09 ppm / 1‐hour 0.07 ppm / 8‐hour 0.070 ppm, / 8‐hour (a) Pulmonary function decrements and localized lung edema in humans and animals; (b) Risk to public health implied by alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in animals; (c) Increased mortality risk; (d) Risk to public health implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary morphology in animals after long‐term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans; (e) Vegetation damage; and (f) Property damage. Carbon Monoxide (CO) 20.0 ppm / 1‐hour 9.0 ppm / 8‐hour 35.0 ppm / 1‐hour 9.0 ppm / 8‐hour (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of coronary heart disease; (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung disease; (c) Impairment of central nervous system functions; and (d) Possible increased risk to fetuses. Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 0.18 ppm / 1‐hour 0.030 ppm / annual 100 ppb / 1‐hour 0.053 ppm / annual (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and respiratory symptoms in sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public health implied by pulmonary and extra‐pulmonary biochemical and cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes; and (c) Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 0.25 ppm / 1‐hour 0.04 ppm / 24‐hour 75 ppb / 1‐hour 0.14 ppm/annual (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which may include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness, during exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma. Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10) 50 µg/m3 / 24‐hour 20 µg/m3 / annual 150 µg/m3 / 24‐ hour (a) Exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with respiratory or cardiovascular disease; (b) Declines in pulmonary function growth in children; and (c) Increased risk of premature death from heart or lung diseases in elderly. Suspended Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 12 µg/m3 / annual 35 µg/m3 / 24‐hour 12 µg/m3 / annual Sulfates 25 µg/m3 / 24‐hour No Federal Standards (a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of asthmatic symptoms; (c ) Aggravation of cardio‐pulmonary disease; (d) Vegetation damage; (e) Degradation of visibility; and (f) Property damage. Lead 1.5 µg/m3 / 30‐day 0.15 µg/m3 /3‐ month rolling (a) Learning disabilities; and (b) Impairment of blood formation and nerve conduction. Visibility Reducing Particles Extinction coefficient of 0.23 per kilometer ‐ visibility of ten miles or more due to particles when relative humidity is less than 70 percent. No Federal Standards Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less than 70 percent. Source: http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf . 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 18 Table D – South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Criteria Pollutant Standard Averaging Time Designationa) Attainment Dateb) 1‐Hour Ozonec) NAAQS 1979 1‐Hour (0.12 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 2/6/2023 (revised deadline) CAAQS 1‐Hour (0.09 ppm) Nonattainment N/A 8‐Hour Ozoned) NAAQS 1997 8‐Hour (0.08 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 6/15/2024 NAAQS 2008 8‐Hour (0.075 ppm) Nonattainment (Extreme) 8/3/2038 NAAQS 2015 8‐Hour (0.070 ppm) Pending – Expect Nonattainment (Extreme) Pending (beyond 2032) CAAQS 8‐Hour (0.070 ppm) Nonattainment Beyond 2032 CO NAAQS 1‐Hour (35 ppm) 8‐Hour (9 ppm) Attainment (Maintenance) 6/11/2007 (attained) CAAQS 1‐Hour (20 ppm) 8‐Hour (9 ppm) Attainment 6/11/2007 (attained) NO2e) NAAQS 2010 1‐Hour (0.10 ppm) Unclassifiable/ Attainment N/A (attained) NAAQS 1971 Annual (0.053 ppm) Attainment (Maintenance) 9/22/1998 (attained) CAAQS 1‐Hour (0.18 ppm) Annual (0.030 ppm) Attainment ‐‐‐ SO2f) NAAQS 2010 1‐Hour (75 ppb) Designations Pending (expect Unclassifiable/ Attainment) N/A (attained) NAAQS 1971 24‐Hour (0.14 ppm) 1971 Annual (0.03 ppm) Unclassifiable/ Attainment 3/19/1979 (attained) PM10 NAAQS 1987 24‐hour (150 μg/m3) Attainment (Maintenance)g) 7/26/2013 (attained) CAAQS 24‐hour (50 μg/m3) Annual (20 μg/m3) Nonattainment N/A PM2.5h) NAAQS 2006 24‐Hour (35 μg/m3) Nonattainment (Serious) 12/31/2019 NAAQS 1997 Annual (15.0 μg/m3) Attainment (final determination pending) 8/24/2016 (attained 2013) NAAQS 2012 Annual (12.0 μg/m3) Nonattainment (Moderate) 12/31/2021 CAAQS Annual (12.0 μg/m3) Nonattainment N/A Leadi) NAAQS 2008 3‐Months Rolling (0.15 μg/m3) Nonattainment (Partial) (Attainment determination requested) 12/31/2015 Source: SCAQMD, February 2016 Notes: a) U.S. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassifiable/Attainment or Unclassifiable b) A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration c) The 1979 1‐hour O3 standard (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective June 15, 2005; however, the Basin has not attained this standard and therefore has some continuing obligations with respect to the revoked standard d) The 2008 8‐hour ozone NAAQS (0.075 ppm) was revised to 0.070 ppm. Effective 12/28/15 with classifications and implementation goals to be finalized by 10/1/17; the 1997 8‐hour O3 NAAQS (0.08 ppm) was revoked in the 2008 O3 implementation rule, effective 4/6/15;there are continuing obligations under the revoked 1997 and revised 2008 O3 until they are attained. e) New NO2 1‐hour standard, effective August 2, 2010; attainment designations January 20, 2012; annual NO2 standard retained f) The 1971 annual and 24‐hour SO2 standards were revoked, effective August 23, 2010; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 19 until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1‐hour standard. Area designations are still pending, with Basin expected to be designated Unclassifiable /Attainment. g) Annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective December 18, 2006; 24‐hour PM10 NAAQS deadline was 12/31/2006; SCAQMD request for attainment redesignation and PM10 maintenance plan was approved by U.S. EPA on June 26, 2013, effective July 26, 2013. h) The attainment deadline for the 2006 24‐Hour PM2.5 NAAQS was 12/31/15 for the former “moderate” classification; EPA approved reclassification to “serious”, effective 2/12/16 with an attainment deadline of 12/31/19; the 2012 (proposal year) annual PM2.5 NAAQS was revised on 1/15/13, effective 3/18/13, from 15 to 12 μg/m3; new annual designations were final 1/15/15, effective 4/15/15; on July 25, 2016 EPA finalized a determination that the Basin attained the 1997 annual (15.0 μg/m3) and 24‐hour PM2.5 (65 μg/m3) NAAQS, effective August 24, 2016 i) Partial Nonattainment designation – Los Angeles County portion of Basin only for near‐source monitors. Expect to remain in attainment based on current monitoring data; attainment re‐designation request pending. In 2015, one or more stations in the Air Basin exceeded the most current federal standards on a total of 146 days (40 percent of the year), including: 8‐hour ozone (113 days over 2015 ozone NAAQS), 24‐hour PM2.5 (30 days, including near‐road sites; 25 days for ambient sites only), PM10 (2 days), and NO2 (1 day). Despite substantial improvement in air quality over the past few decades, some air monitoring stations in the Air Basin still exceed the NAAQS for ozone more frequently than any other area in the United States. Seven of the top 10 stations in the nation most frequently exceeding the 2015 8‐hour ozone NAAQS in 2015 were located within the Air Basin, including stations in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties (SCAQMD, 2016). PM2.5 levels in the Air Basin have improved significantly in recent years. By 2013 and again in 2014 and 2015, there were no stations measuring PM2.5 in the Air Basin that violated the former 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS (15.0 µg/m3) for the 3‐year design value period. On July 25, 2016 the EPA finalized a determination that the Basin attained the 1997 annual (15.0 µg/m3) and 24‐hour PM2.5 (65 µg/m3) NAAQS, effective August 24, 2016. Of the 17 federal PM2.5 monitors at ambient stations in the Air Basin for the 2013‐2015 period, five stations had design values over the current 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS (12.0 µg/m3), including: Mira Loma (Air Basin maximum at 14.1 µg/m3), Rubidoux, Fontana, Ontario, Central Los Angeles, and Compton. For the 24‐hour PM2.5 NAAQS (35.0 µg/m3) there were 14 stations in the Air Basin in 2015 that had one or more daily exceedances of the standard, with a combined total of 25 days over that standard in the Air Basin. While it was previously anticipated that the Air Basin’s 24‐ hour PM2.5 NAAQS would be attained by 2015, this did not occur based on the data for 2013 through 2015. The higher number of days exceeding the 24‐hour PM2.5 NAAQS over what was expected is largely attributed to the severe drought conditions over this period that allowed for more stagnant conditions in the Air Basin with multi‐day buildups of higher PM2.5 concentrations. This was caused by the lack of storm‐related dispersion and rain‐out of PM and its precursors (SCAQMD, 2016). The Air Basin is currently in attainment for the federal standards for SO2, CO, NO2, and PM10 and the Orange County portion of the Air Basin is currently in attainment for the federal standards for lead. While the concentration level of the 1‐hour NO2 federal standard (100 ppb) was exceeded in the Air Basin for one day in 2015 (Long Beach‐ Hudson Station), the NAAQS NO2 design value has not been exceeded. Therefore, the Air Basin remains in attainment of the NO2 NAAQS (SCAQMD, 2016). 4.2 State – California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the SIP. The CAAQS for criteria pollutants are shown above in Table C. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 20 in California, consumer products (e.g. hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The Air Basin has been designated by the CARB as a non‐attainment area for ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Currently, the Air Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, NO2, SO2, lead, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. The following lists the State of California Code of Regulations (CCR) air quality emission rules that are applicable, but not limited to all warehouse projects in the State. Assembly Bill 2588 The Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Information and Assessment Act (Assembly Bill [AB] 2588, 1987, Connelly) was enacted in 1987 as a means to establish a formal air toxics emission inventory risk quantification program. AB 2588, as amended, establishes a process that requires stationary sources to report the type and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely release in California. The data is ranked by high, intermediate, and low categories, which are determined by: the potency, toxicity, quantity, volume, and proximity of the facility to nearby receptors. CARB Regulation for In‐Use Off‐Road Diesel Vehicles On July 26, 2007, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) adopted California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 to reduce diesel particulate matter (DPM) and NOx emissions from in‐use off‐road heavy‐duty diesel vehicles in California. Such vehicles are used in construction, mining, and industrial operations. The regulation limits idling to no more than five consecutive minutes, requires reporting and labeling, and requires disclosure of the regulation upon vehicle sale. Performance requirements of the rule are based on a fleet’s average NOx emissions, which can be met by replacing older vehicles with newer, cleaner vehicles or by applying exhaust retrofits. The regulation was amended in 2010 to delay the original timeline of the performance requirement making the first compliance deadline January 1, 2014 for large fleets (over 5,000 horsepower), 2017 for medium fleets (2,501‐5,000 horsepower), and 2019 for small fleets (2,500 horsepower or less). Currently, no commercial operation in California may add any equipment to their fleet that has a Tier 0 or Tier 1 engine. By January 1, 2018 medium and large fleets will be restricted from adding Tier 2 engines to their fleets and by January 2023, no commercial operation will be allowed to add Tier 2 engines to their fleets. It should be noted that commercial fleets may continue to use their existing Tier 0 and 1 equipment, if they can demonstrate that the average emissions from their entire fleet emissions meet the NOx emissions targets. CARB Resolution 08‐43 for On‐Road Diesel Truck Fleets On December 12, 2008 the CARB adopted Resolution 08‐43, which limits NOx, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from on‐road diesel truck fleets that operate in California. On October 12, 2009 Executive Order R‐09‐010 was adopted that codified Resolution 08‐43 into Section 2025, title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. This regulation requires that by the year 2023 all commercial diesel trucks that operate in California shall meet model year 2010 (Tier 4 Final) or latter emission standards. In the interim period, this regulation provides annual interim targets for fleet owners to meet. By January 1, 2014, 50 percent of a truck fleet is required to have installed Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for NOx emissions and 100 percent of a truck fleet installed BACT for PM10 emissions. This regulation also provides a few exemptions including a onetime per year 3‐day pass for trucks registered outside of California. All on‐ road diesel trucks utilized during construction of the proposed project will be required to comply with Resolution 08‐43. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 21 4.3 Regional – Southern California The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin. To that end, as a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. The Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on March 3, 2016 and was adopted by CARB on March 23, 2017 for inclusion into the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 2016 AQMP was prepared in order to meet the following standards: 8‐hour Ozone (75 ppb) by 2032 Annual PM2.5 (12 µg/m3) by 2021‐2025 8‐hour Ozone (80 ppb) by 2024 (updated from the 2007 and 2012 AQMPs) 1‐hour Ozone (120 ppb) by 2023 (updated from the 2012 AQMP) 24‐hour PM2.5 (35 µg/m3) by 2019 (updated from the 2012 AQMP) In addition to meeting the above standards, the 2016 AQMP also includes revisions to the attainment demonstrations for the 1997 8‐hour ozone NAAQS and the 1979 1‐hour ozone NAAQS. The prior 2012 AQMP was prepared in order to demonstrate attainment with the 24‐hour PM2.5 standard by 2014 through adoption of all feasible measures. The prior 2007 AQMP demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8‐hour ozone (80 ppb) standard by 2023, through implementation of future improvements in control techniques and technologies. These “black box” emissions reductions represent 65 percent of the remaining NOx emission reductions by 2023 in order to show attainment with the 1997 8‐hour ozone NAAQS. Given the magnitude of these needed emissions reductions, additional NOx control measures have been provided in the 2012 AQMP even though the primary purpose was to show compliance with 24‐hour PM2.5 emissions standards. The 2016 AQMP provides a new approach that focuses on available, proven and cost effective alternatives to traditional strategies, while seeking to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities to promote reductions in GHG emissions and TAC emissions as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement. The 2016 AQMP recognizes the critical importance of working with other agencies to develop funding and other incentives that encourage the accelerated transition of vehicles, buildings and industrial facilities to cleaner technologies in a manner that benefits not only air quality, but also local businesses and the regional economy. Although SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts, it does not have the authority to directly regulate air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects throughout the Air Basin. Instead, this is controlled through local jurisdictions in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In order to assist local jurisdictions with air quality compliance issues the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook), prepared by SCAQMD, 1993, with the most 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 22 current updates found at http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/hdbk.html, was developed in accordance with the projections and programs detailed in the AQMPs. The purpose of the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties in evaluating a proposed project’s potential air quality impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook explains the procedures that SCAQMD recommends be followed for the environmental review process required by CEQA. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook provides direction on how to evaluate potential air quality impacts, how to determine whether these impacts are significant, and how to mitigate these impacts. The SCAQMD intends that by providing this guidance, the air quality impacts of plans and development proposals will be analyzed accurately and consistently throughout the Air Basin, and adverse impacts will be minimized. The following lists the SCAQMD rules that are applicable but not limited to mixed‐use development projects in the Air Basin. Rule 402 ‐ Nuisance Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which causes injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Compliance with Rule 402 will reduce local air quality and odor impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Rule 403‐ Fugitive Dust Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction activities and requires that no person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust such that dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line or the dust emission exceeds 20 percent opacity, if the dust is from the operation of a motorized vehicle. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Available Control Measures, which include but are not limited to the measures below. Compliance with these rules would reduce local air quality impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Utilize either a pad of washed gravel 50 feet long, 100 feet of paved surface, a wheel shaker, or a wheel washing device to remove material from vehicle tires and undercarriages before leaving project site. Do not allow any track out of material to extend more than 25 feet onto a public roadway and remove all track out at the end of each workday. Water all exposed areas on active sites at least three times per day and pre‐water all areas prior to clearing and soil moving activities. Apply nontoxic chemical stabilizers according to manufacturer specifications to all construction areas that will remain inactive for 10 days or longer. Pre‐water all material to be exported prior to loading, and either cover all loads or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 23114. Replant all disturbed area as soon as practical. Suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including wind gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 23 Restrict traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour or less. Rule 445‐ Fireplaces Rule 445 governs emissions from fireplaces. This rule restricts the installation of wood‐burning fireplaces into any new development and only allows the installation of dedicated gaseous‐fueled fireplaces. Rules 1108 and 1108.1 – Cutback and Emulsified Asphalt Rules 1108 and 1108.1 govern the sale, use, and manufacturing of asphalt and limits the VOC content in asphalt. This rule regulates the VOC contents of asphalt used during construction as well as any on‐going maintenance during operations. Therefore, all asphalt used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1108.1. Rule 1113 – Architectural Coatings Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coatings and limits the VOC content in sealers, coatings, paints and solvents. This rule regulates the VOC contents of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Rule 1143 – Paint Thinners Rule 1143 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of paint thinners and multi‐purpose solvents that are used in thinning of coating materials, cleaning of coating application equipment, and other solvent cleaning operations. This rule regulates the VOC content of solvents used during construction. Solvents used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1143. Southern California Association of Governments The SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), adopted April, 2016 and the 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), adopted October 2013, which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. Although the RTP/SCS and FTIP are primarily planning documents for future transportation projects a key component of these plans are to integrate land use planning with transportation planning that promotes higher density infill development in close proximity to existing transit service. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP/SCS, FTIP, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. 4.4 Local – City of Anaheim Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Anaheim, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through its police power and decision‐making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the AQMPs. Examples of such measures include bus turnouts, energy‐efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 24 signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. In accordance with the CEQA requirements, the City does not, however, have the expertise to develop plans, programs, procedures, and methodologies to ensure that air quality within the City and region will meet federal and state standards. Instead, the City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. City of Anaheim General Plan The City of Anaheim General Plan provides the following air quality‐related goals and policies that are applicable to the proposed project. Goal 8.1 Reduce locally generated emissions through improved traffic flows and construction management practices. Policies 2) Regulate construction practices, including grading, dust suppression, chemical management, and encourage pre‐determined construction routes that minimize dust and particulate matter pollution. Goal 9.1 Reduce single‐occupancy vehicle trips. Policies 3) Encourage bicycle and pedestrian travel by improving the City’s trail and bikeway master plan and by providing convenient links between the trail system and desired destinations. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 25 5.0 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE MANAGEMENT The regulatory setting related to global climate change is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional, and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly, as well as individually, to reduce GHG emissions through legislation, regulations, planning, policy‐making, education, and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for global climate change regulations are discussed below. 5.1 International In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to evaluate the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreement with the goal of controlling GHG emissions. The parties of the UNFCCC adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which set binding GHG reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries, the objective of reducing their collective GHG emissions by five percent below 1990 levels by 2012. The Kyoto Protocol has been ratified by 182 countries, but has not been ratified by the United States. It should be noted that Japan and Canada opted out of the Kyoto Protocol and the remaining developed countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol have not met their Kyoto targets. The Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012 and the amendment for the second commitment period from 2013 to 2020 has not yet entered into legal force. The Parties to the Kyoto Protocol negotiated the Paris Agreement in December 2015, agreeing to set a goal of limiting global warming to less than 2 degrees Celsius compared with pre‐industrial levels. The Paris Agreement has been adopted by 195 nations with 147 ratifying it, including the United States by President Obama, who ratified it by Executive Order on September 3, 2016. On June 1, 2017, President Trump announced that the United States is withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, however the Paris Agreement is still legally binding by the other remaining nations. Additionally, the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and 1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete ozone in the stratosphere—CFCs, halons, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform—were to be phased out, with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005. 5.2 Federal – United States Environmental Protection Agency The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for implementing federal policy to address global climate change. The Federal government administers a wide array of public‐private partnerships to reduce U.S. GHG intensity. These programs focus on energy efficiency, renewable energy, methane, and other non‐CO2 gases, agricultural practices and implementation of technologies to achieve GHG reductions. EPA implements several voluntary programs that substantially contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions. In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (Docket No. 05–1120), argued November 29, 2006 and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to regulate greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory requirements. As such, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA should be required to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 26 In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110‐161), EPA proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009, the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December 29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual reports to EPA. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions did not impose any requirements on industry or other entities, however, since 2009 the EPA has been providing GHG emission standards for vehicles and other stationary sources of GHG emissions that are regulated by the EPA. On September 13, 2013 the EPA Administrator signed 40 CFR Part 60, that limits emissions from new sources to 1,100 pounds of CO2 per MWh for fossil fuel‐fired utility boilers and 1,000 pounds of CO2 per MWh for large natural gas‐fired combustion units. On August 3, 2015, the EPA announced the Clean Power Plan, emissions guidelines for U.S. states to follow in developing plans to reduce GHG emissions from existing fossil fuel‐fired power plants (Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 205, October 23 2015). On October 11, 2017, the EPA issued a formal proposal to repeal the Clean Power Plan and on June 19, 2019 the EPA replaced the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy rule that is anticipated to lower power sector GHG emissions by 11 million tons by the year 2030. 5.3 State The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has the primary responsible for implementing state policy to address global climate change, however there are State regulations related to global climate change that affect a variety of State agencies. CARB, which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both the federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the SIP. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g. hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. In 2008, CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan that proposes a “comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall carbon GHG emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health” (CARB 2008). The Climate Change Scoping Plan has a range of GHG reduction actions which include direct regulations; alternative compliance mechanisms; monetary and non‐monetary incentives; voluntary actions; market‐based mechanisms such as a cap‐and‐trade system. In 2014, CARB approved the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB, 2014) that identifies additional strategies moving beyond the 2020 targets to the year 2050. On December 14, 2017 CARB adopted the California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, November 2017 (CARB, 2017) that provides specific statewide policies and measures to achieve the 2030 GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 27 aspirational 2050 GHG reduction target of 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. In addition, the State has passed the following laws directing CARB to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions, which are listed below in chronological order, with the most current first. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6 CCR Title 24, Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The California Energy Commission (CEC) is the agency responsible for the standards that are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. In 2008 the State set an energy‐use reduction goal of zero‐net‐energy use of all new homes by 2020 and the CEC was mandated to meet this goal through revisions to the Title 24, Part 6 regulations. The Title 24 standards are updated on a three‐year schedule and since 2008 the standards have been incrementally moving to the 2020 goal of the zero‐net‐energy use. Currently the 2016 Title 24 standards are in effect and on January 1, 2020 the 2019 standards will go into effect, that have been designed so that the average new home built in California will now use zero‐net‐energy. Single‐family homes built with 2019 standards will use about 7 percent less energy due to energy efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 standards. The 2019 standards also now require that all single‐family homes to have rooftop solar photovoltaic systems and when the solar systems are factored in, homes built under the 2019 standards will use about 53 percent less energy than homes built under the 2016 standards. In addition to requiring rooftop solar systems, the 2019 standards also encourage the use of battery storage and heat pump water heaters, require the more widespread use of LED lighting, as well as improve the building’s thermal envelope through high performance attics, walls and windows. The 2019 standards also require improvements to ventilation systems by requiring highly efficient air filters to trap hazardous air particulates as well as improvements to kitchen ventilation systems. (https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Standar ds_FAQ.pdf) California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11 CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (CalGreen) was developed in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. The CalGreen Building Standards are also updated every three years and the current version is the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code, which became effective on January 1, 2017. The 2019 California Green Building Standard Code will become effective on January 1, 2020. The CALGreen Code contains requirements for construction site selection; storm water control during construction; construction waste reduction; indoor water use reduction; material selection; natural resource conservation; site irrigation conservation; and more. The code provides for design options allowing the designer to determine how best to achieve compliance for a given site or building condition. The code also requires building commissioning, which is a process for verifying that all building systems (e.g., heating and cooling equipment and lighting systems) are functioning at their maximum efficiency. The CALGreen Code provides standards for bicycle parking, carpool/vanpool/electric vehicle spaces, light and glare reduction, grading and paving, energy efficient appliances, renewable energy, graywater systems, water efficient plumbing fixtures, recycling and recycled materials, pollutant controls (including moisture control and indoor air quality), acoustical controls, storm water management, building design, 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 28 insulation, flooring, and framing, among others. Implementation of the CALGreen Code measures reduces energy consumption and vehicle trips and encourages the use of alternative‐fuel vehicles, which reduces pollutant emissions. Some of the notable changes in the 2019 CALGreen Code over the current 2016 CALGreen Code include: an alignment of building code engineering requirements with the national standards that include anchorage requirements for solar panels, provides design requirements for buildings in tsunami zones, increases Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) for air filters from 8 to 13, increased electric vehicle charging requirements in parking areas, and sets minimum requirements for use of shade trees. Senate Bill 100 Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) was adopted September 2018 and requires that by December 1, 2045 that 100 percent of retail sales of electricity to be generated from renewable or zero‐carbon emission sources of electricity. SB 100 supersedes the renewable energy requirements set by SB 350, SB 1078, SB 107, and SB X1‐2. However, the interim renewable energy thresholds from the prior Bills of 44 percent by December 31, 2024, 52 percent by December 31, 2027, and 60 percent by December 31, 2030, will remain in effect. Executive Order B‐48‐18 and Assembly Bill 2127 The California Governor issued Executive Order B‐48‐18 on January 26, 2018 that orders all state entities to work with the private sector to put at least five million zero‐emission vehicles on California roads by 2030 and to install 200 hydrogen fueling stations and 250,000 electric vehicle chargers by 2025. Currently there are approximately 350,000 electric vehicles operating in California, which represents approximately 1.5 percent of the 24 million vehicles total currently operating in California. Implementation of Executive Order B‐48‐18 would result in approximately 20 percent of all vehicles in California to be zero emission electric vehicles. Assembly Bill 2127 (AB 2127) was codified into statute on September 13, 2018 and requires that the California Energy Commission working with the State Air Resources Board prepare biannual assessments of the statewide electric vehicle charging infrastructure needed to support the levels of zero emission vehicle adoption required for the State to meet its goals of putting at least 5 million zero‐emission vehicles on California roads by 2030. Executive Order B‐30‐15, Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197 The California Governor issued Executive Order B‐30‐15 on April 29, 2015 that aims to reduce California’s GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This executive order aligns California’s GHG reduction targets with those of other international governments, such as the European Union that set the same target for 2030 in October, 2014. This target will make it possible to reach the ultimate goal of reducing GHG emissions 80 percent under 1990 levels by 2050 that is based on scientifically established levels needed in the U.S.A to limit global warming below 2 degrees Celsius – the warming threshold at which scientists say there will likely be major climate disruptions such as super droughts and rising sea levels. Assembly Bill 197 (AB 197) (September 8, 2016) and Senate Bill 32 (SB 32) (September 8, 2016) codified into statute the GHG emissions reduction targets of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 as detailed in Executive Order B‐30‐15. AB 197 also requires additional GHG emissions reporting that is broken down to sub‐county levels and requires CARB to consider the social costs of emissions impacting disadvantaged communities. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 29 Executive Order B‐29‐15 The California Governor issued Executive Order B‐29‐15 on April 1, 2015 and directed the State Water Resources Control Board to impose restrictions to achieve a statewide 25% reduction in urban water usage and directed the Department of Water Resources to replace 50 million square feet of lawn with drought tolerant landscaping through an update to the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The Ordinance also requires installation of more efficient irrigation systems, promotion of greywater usage and onsite stormwater capture, and limits the turf planted in new residential landscapes to 25 percent of the total area and restricts turf from being planted in median strips or in parkways unless the parkway is next to a parking strip and a flat surface is required to enter and exit vehicles. Executive Order B‐29‐15 would reduce GHG emissions associated with the energy used to transport and filter water. Assembly Bill 341 and Senate Bills 939 and 1374 Senate Bill 939 (SB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling or other means. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills. Assembly Bill 341 (AB 341) was adopted in 2011 and builds upon the waste reduction measures of SB 939 and 1374, and sets a new target of a 75 percent reduction in solid waste generated by the year 2020. Senate Bill 375 Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 in order to support the State’s climate action goals to reduce GHG emissions through coordinated regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires CARB to set regional targets for GHG emissions reductions from passenger vehicle use. In 2010, CARB established targets for 2020 and 2035 for each Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) within the State. It was up to each MPO to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) to meet CARB’s 2020 and 2035 GHG emission reduction targets. These reduction targets are required to be updated every eight years and the most current targets are detailed at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our‐work/programs/sustainable‐communities‐program/regional‐ plan‐targets, which provides GHG emissions reduction targets for SCAG of 8 percent by 2020 and 19 percent by 2035. The 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), adopted by SCAG April, 2016 provides a 2020 GHG emission reduction target of 8 percent and a 2035 GHG emission reduction target of 18 percent. SCAG will need to develop additional strategies in its next revision of the RTP/SCS in order to meet CARB’s new 19 percent GHG emission reduction target for 2035. CARB is also charged with reviewing SCAG’s RTP/SCS for consistency with its assigned targets. City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS. However, new provisions of CEQA incentivize, through streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS and categorized as “transit priority projects.” Assembly Bill 1109 California Assembly Bill 1109 (AB 1109) was adopted October 2007, also known as the Lighting Efficiency and Toxics Reduction Act, prohibits the manufacturing of lights after January 1, 2010 that contain levels 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 30 of hazardous substances prohibited by the European Union pursuant to the RoHS Directive. AB 1109 also requires reductions in energy usage for lighting and is structured to reduce lighting electrical consumption by: (1) At least 50 percent reduction from 2007 levels for indoor residential lighting; and (2) At least 25 percent reduction from 2007 levels for indoor commercial and all outdoor lighting by 2018. AB 1109 would reduce GHG emissions through reducing the amount of electricity required to be generated by fossil fuels in California. Executive Order S‐1‐07 Executive Order S‐1‐07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Executive Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early‐action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32. In 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the LCFS. The standard was challenged in the courts, but has been in effect since 2011 and was re‐approved by the CARB in 2015. The LCFS is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. The LCFS is designed to provide a framework that uses market mechanisms to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards that fuel producers and importers must meet annually. Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn‐derived ethanol and low‐sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low‐carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles, are also considered as low‐carbon fuels. Senate Bill 97 Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Natural Resources Agency, to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Natural Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010. Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the State CEQA guidelines that addresses GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporated GHG language throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance were provided and no specific mitigation measures were identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below: Climate Action Plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan. Local governments are encouraged to quantify the GHG emissions of proposed projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 31 complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment. When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts. New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of GHG emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. OPR is clear to state that “to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation.” OPR’s emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach. Environmental impact reports must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential. Assembly Bill 32 In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which will be phased in starting in 2012. Emission reductions shall include carbon sequestration projects that would remove carbon from the atmosphere and utilize best management practices that are technologically feasible and cost effective. In 2007 CARB released the calculated Year 1990 GHG emissions of 431 million metric tons of CO2e (MMTCO2e). The 2020 target of 431 MMTCO2e requires the reduction of 78 MMTCO2e, or approximately 16 percent from the State’s projected 2020 business as usual emissions of 509 MMTCO2e (CARB, 2014). Under AB 32, CARB was required to adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to achieve reductions in GHGs to meet the 1990 cap by 2020. Early measures CARB took to lower GHG emissions included requiring operators of the largest industrial facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of CO2 in a calendar year to submit verification of GHG emissions by December 1, 2010. The CARB Board also approved nine discrete early action measures that include regulations affecting landfills, motor vehicle fuels, refrigerants in cars, port operations and other sources, all of which became enforceable on or before January 1, 2010. CARB’s Scoping Plan that was adopted in 2009, proposes a variety of measures including: strengthening energy efficiency and building standards; targeted fees on water and energy use; a market‐based cap‐ and‐trade system; achieving a 33 percent renewable energy mix; and a fee regulation to fund the program. The 2014 update to the Scoping Plan identifies strategies moving beyond the 2020 targets to the year 2050. The Cap and Trade Program established under the Scoping Plan sets a statewide limit on sources responsible for 85 percent of California’s GHG emissions, and has established a market for long‐term investment in energy efficiency and cleaner fuels since 2012. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 32 Executive Order S‐3‐05 In 2005 the California Governor issued Executive Order S 3‐05, GHG Emission, which established the following reduction targets: 2010: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels; 2020: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels; 2050: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The Executive Order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi‐agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs. The State achieved its first goal of reducing GHG emissions to 2000 levels by 2010. Assembly Bill 1493 California Assembly Bill 1493 (also known as the Pavley Bill, in reference to its author Fran Pavley) was enacted on July 22, 2002 and required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2004, CARB approved the development of “Pavley I” regulations limiting the amount of GHGs that may be released from new passenger automobiles that are being phased in between model years 2009 through 2016. These regulations will reduce GHG emissions by 30 percent from 2002 levels by 2016. In June 2009, the EPA granted California the authority to implement GHG emission reduction standards for light duty vehicles, in September 2009, amendments to the Pavley I regulations were adopted by CARB and implementation of the “Pavley I” regulations started in 2009. The second set of regulations “Pavley II” was developed in 2010, and is being phased in between model years 2017 through 2025 with the goal of reducing GHG emissions by 45 percent by the year 2020 as compared to the 2002 fleet. The Pavley II standards were developed by linking the GHG emissions and formerly separate toxic tailpipe emissions standards previously known as the “LEV III” (third stage of the Low Emission Vehicle standards) into a single regulatory framework. The new rules reduce emissions from gasoline‐powered cars as well as promote zero‐emissions auto technologies such as electricity and hydrogen, and through increasing the infrastructure for fueling hydrogen vehicles. In 2009, the U.S. EPA granted California the authority to implement the GHG standards for passenger cars, pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles and these GHG emissions standards are currently being implemented nationwide. However, EPA has performed a midterm evaluation of the longer‐term standards for model years 2022‐ 2025, and based on the findings of this midterm evaluation, the EPA has proposed to amend the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) and GHG emissions standards for light vehicles for model years 2021 through 2026. The EPA’s proposed amendments do not include any extension of the legal waiver granted to California by the 1970 Clean Air Act and which has allowed the State to set tighter standards for vehicle pipe emissions than the EPA standards. On September 20, 2019, California filed suit over the EPA decision to revoke California’s legal waiver that has been joined by 22 other states. 5.3 Regional – Southern California The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin. To that end, as a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 33 Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources. The SCAQMD is also responsible for GHG emissions for projects where it is the lead agency. However, for other projects in the SCAB where it is not the lead agency, it is limited to providing resources to other lead agencies in order to assist them in determining GHG emission thresholds and GHG reduction measures. In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a working group, which is described below. SCAQMD Working Group Since neither CARB nor the OPR has developed GHG emissions threshold, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to develop significance thresholds related to GHG emissions. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that either provides a quantitative annual thresholds of 3,500 MTCO2e for residential uses, 1,400 MTCO2e for commercial uses, and 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed uses. An alternative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for all land use types is also proposed. Southern California Association of Governments The SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), adopted April, 2016 and the 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), adopted October 2013, which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. Although the RTP/SCS and FTIP are primarily planning documents for future transportation projects a key component of these plans are to integrate land use planning with transportation planning that promotes higher density infill development in close proximity to existing transit service. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP/SCS, FTIP, and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. 5.4 Local – City of Anaheim Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Anaheim, have the authority and responsibility to reduce GHG emissions through their police power and decision‐making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of GHG emissions resulting from its land use decisions. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the global climate change potential of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant global climate change impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan: Sustainable Electric & Water Initiatives (GHG Reduction Plan), prepared by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, July 2015, provides targets to energy use, water conservation, photovoltaic (PV) rooftop installations, and transportation emissions. The 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 34 targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan that are applicable to the proposed project are detailed below: Power Supply Targets 2020 Target 20% (480,000 MTCO2e) GHG emissions reduction from 1990 baseline levels annually. 2030 Target 40% (920,000 MTCO2e) GHG emissions reduction from 1990 baseline levels annually. Energy Efficiency Targets 2020 Target 15 percent reduction in energy utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim. 2030 Target 30 percent reduction in energy utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim. Water Conservation Targets 2020 Target 20 percent reduction in water utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim. 2030 Target 25 percent reduction in water utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim. Photovoltaic (PV) Targets 2020 Target 27,000 kW of PV systems installed. 2030 Target 37,000 kW of PV systems installed. Vehicle Emissions Targets 2020 Target 6,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions. 2030 Target 20,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 35 6.0 ATMOSPHERIC SETTING 6.1 South Coast Air Basin The project site is located within Orange County, which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (Air Basin) that includes the non‐desert portions of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties and all of Orange County. The Air Basin is located on a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills to the east. Regionally, the Air Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains to the east forming the inland perimeter. 6.2 Local Climate Orange County is located on a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills to the east. The general region lies in the semi‐permanent high‐pressure zone of the eastern Pacific. As a result, the climate is mild, tempered by cool sea breezes. Occasional periods of strong Santa Ana winds and winter storms interrupt the otherwise mild weather pattern. Although the Air Basin has a semi‐arid climate, the air near the surface is typically moist because of the presence of a shallow marine layer. Except for infrequent periods when dry air is brought into the Air Basin by offshore winds, the ocean effect is dominant. Periods of heavy fog are frequent and low stratus clouds, often referred to as “high fog” are a characteristic climate feature. Winds are an important parameter in characterizing the air quality environment of a project site because they determine the regional pattern of air pollution transport and control the rate of dispersion near a source. Daytime winds in Orange County are usually light breezes from off the coast as air moves regionally onshore from the cool Pacific Ocean. These winds are usually the strongest in the dry summer months. Nighttime winds in Orange County are a result mainly from the drainage of cool air off of the mountains to the east and they occur more often during the winter months and are usually lighter than the daytime winds. Between the periods of dominant airflow, periods of air stagnation may occur, both in the morning and evening hours. Whether such a period of stagnation occurs is one of the critical determinants of air quality conditions on any given day. During the winter and fall months, surface high‐pressure systems north of the Air Basin combined with other meteorological conditions, can result in very strong winds, called “Santa Ana Winds”, from the northeast. These winds normally have durations of a few days before predominant meteorological conditions are reestablished. The highest wind speed typically occurs during the afternoon due to daytime thermal convection caused by surface heating. This convection brings about a downward transfer of momentum from stronger winds aloft. It is not uncommon to have sustained winds of 60 miles per hour with higher gusts during a Santa Ana Wind event. The temperature and precipitation levels for the Anaheim Monitoring Station is shown below in Table E. Table E shows that August is typically the warmest month and December is typically the coolest month. Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space. Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid‐latitude storms from late November to early April, with summers being almost completely dry. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 36 Table E – Monthly Climate Data Month Average Maximum Temperature (°F) Average Minimum Temperature (°F) Average Total Precipitation (inches) January 70.0 47.5 3.34 February 70.0 48.2 3.47 March 72.4 50.4 1.86 April 74.7 52.8 0.83 May 77.1 57.3 0.53 June 80.1 60.5 0.15 July 85.2 64.2 0.07 August 87.1 64.5 0.01 September 86.5 62.7 0.10 October 81.2 57.7 0.72 November 75.4 51.8 0.99 December 69.7 46.9 2.02 Annual 77.4 55.4 14.09 Source: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi‐bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca0192 6.3 Monitored Local Air Quality The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the Air Basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Air Basin provided in the 2012 AQMP, indicate that collectively, mobile sources account for 59 percent of the VOC, 88 percent of the NOx emissions and 40 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 10 percent of PM2.5 from road dust. The 2016 AQMP found that since 2012 AQMP projections were made stationary source VOC emissions have decreased by approximately 12 percent, but mobile VOC emissions have increased by 5 percent. The percentage of NOx emissions remain unchanged between the 2012 and 2016 projections. SCAQMD has divided the Air Basin into 38 air‐monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project site is located in air monitoring area 17, which covers the central portion of Orange County. The nearest air monitoring station to the project site is the Anaheim‐ Pampas Lane Monitoring Station (Anaheim Station), which is located approximately 80 feet southwest of the project site at 1630 Pampas Lane, Anaheim. The monitoring data presented in Table F shows that ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) are the air pollutants of primary concern in the project area, which are detailed below: Ozone During the last three years, the State 1‐hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded between zero and two days each year at the Anaheim Station. Both the State and federal 8‐hour ozone standards have been exceeded between one and four days each year over the last three years at the Anaheim Station. Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of Southern California 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 37 contribute to the ozone levels experienced at this monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind. Table F – Local Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary Pollutant (Standard) Year1 2016 2017 2018 Ozone: Maximum 1‐Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.103 0.090 0.112 Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 2 0 1 Maximum 8‐Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.074 0.076 0.071 Days > NAAQS (0.070 ppm) 4 4 1 Days > CAAQs (0.070 ppm) 4 4 1 Nitrogen Dioxide: Maximum 1‐Hour Concentration (ppb) 64.3 81.2 66.0 Days > NAAQS (100 ppb) 0 0 0 Days > CAAQS (180 ppb) 0 0 0 Inhalable Particulates (PM10) : Maximum 24‐Hour National Measurement (ug/m3) 74.0 95.7 94.6 Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3) 0 0 0 Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3) 3 5 2 Annual Arithmetic Mean (AAM) (ug/m3) 27.5 26.9 27.9 Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3) No No No Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3) Yes Yes Yes Ultra‐Fine Particulates (PM2.5): Maximum 24‐Hour National Measurement (ug/m3) 44.4 53.9 63.1 Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3) 1 7 7 Annual Arithmetic Mean (AAM) (ug/m3) 9.4 ND 11.4 Annual > NAAQS and CAAQS (12 ug/m3) No ND No Notes: Exceedances are listed in bold. CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; ND = no data available. 1 Data obtained from the Anaheim Station. Source: http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/ Nitrogen Dioxide The Anaheim Station did not record an exceedance of either the Federal or State 1‐hour NO2 standards for the last three years. Particulate Matter The State 24‐hour concentration standard for PM10 has been exceeded between two and five days each year over the past three years at the Anaheim Station. Over the past three years the Federal 24‐hour standard for PM10 has not been exceeded at the Anaheim Station. The annual PM10 concentration at 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 38 the Anaheim Station has exceeded the State standard for the past three years and has not exceeded the Federal standard for the past three years. Over the past three years the 24‐hour concentration standard for PM2.5 has been exceeded between one and seven days each year over the past three years at the Anaheim Station. The annual PM2.5 concentrations at the Anaheim Station has not exceeded either the State or Federal standard for the past three years. Particulate levels in the area are due to natural sources, grading operations, and motor vehicles. According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths during exercise. 6.4 Toxic Air Contaminant Levels in the Air Basin In order to determine the Air Basin‐wide risks associated with major airborne carcinogens, the SCAQMD conducted the Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES) studies. According to the SCAQMD’s MATES‐ IV study, the project site has an estimated cancer risk of 977 per million persons chance of cancer. In comparison, the average cancer risk for the Air Basin is 991 per million persons, which is based on the use of age‐sensitivity factors detailed in the OEHHA Guidelines (OEHHA, 2015). In order to provide a perspective of risk, it is often estimated that the incidence in cancer over a lifetime for the U.S. population ranges between 1 in 3 to 4 and 1 in 3, or a risk of about 300,000 per million persons. The MATES‐III study referenced a Harvard Report on Cancer Prevention, which estimated that of cancers associated with known risk factors, about 30 percent were related to tobacco, about 30 percent were related to diet and obesity, and about 2 percent were associated with environmental pollution related exposures that includes hazardous air pollutants. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 39 7.0 MODELING PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS 7.1 CalEEMod Model Input Parameters The criteria air pollution and GHG emissions impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2014 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for Orange County for employee, vendor and haul truck vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy equipment operations. EMFAC2014 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. The project characteristics in the CalEEMod model were set to a project location of Orange County, a Climate Zone of 8, utility company of City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department and an opening year of 2023 was utilized in this analysis. Land Use Parameters The proposed project consists of development of a 4‐story, 381,525 square foot residential building with 315 residential apartment units with 3,413 square feet of retail space. A 5‐level 239,072 square foot parking structure would be constructed in the center of the residential building and would contain 639 parking spaces of which 19 parking spaces would have electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces would be designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. The proposed project’s land use parameters that were entered into the CalEEMod model are shown in Table G. Table G – CalEEMod Land Use Parameters Proposed Land Use Land Use Subtype in CalEEMod Land Use Size1 Lot Acreage2 Building/Paving3 (square feet) Residential Building Apartment Mid Rise4 315 DU 3.42 378,112 Retail Space Regional Shopping Center 3.413 TSF 0.08 3,413 Parking Lot Parking Lot 639 PS 1.75 239,072 Notes: 1 DU = Dwelling Unit; TSF = Thousand Square Feet; PS = Parking Space 2 Lot acreage calculated based on the total project area of 5.25 acre. 3 Building/Paving square feet represent area where architectural coatings will be applied. 4 Apartment Mid Rise is defined as Mid‐rise apartments in rental building that have between 3 and 10 levels. 5 Regional Shopping Center is defined as a group of commercial establishments and is based on ITE Code 820, which is the same ITE Code utilized in the Traffic Impact Analysis (Dudek, 2019) Source: CalEEMod User’s Guide (CAPCOA, 2017) Electricity Emission Factors The default CalEEMod emission factors for Anaheim Public Utilities for the Reporting year of 2007 (CalEEMod User Guide Appendix D, Table 1.2) are as follows: Carbon dioxide: 1,543.28 pounds per megawatt‐hour Methane: 0.029 pounds per megawatt‐hour Nitrous oxide: 0.00617 pounds per megawatt‐hour 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 40 According to the City of Anaheim 2018 Power Content Label (http://www.anaheim.net/3452/Power‐ Content‐Label) the 2018 Anaheim Power Mix consisted of 33.97% renewable and 32.84% coal. The City of Anaheim 2007 Power Content Label found that Anaheim Power Mix consisted of 6% renewable and 67% coal. This equates to approximately a 51 percent reduction in GHG emissions between year 2018 and year 2007, which CalEEMod’s default emission factors are based on. As such the CalEEMod default intensity factors have been reduced by 51 percent and the resultant intensity factors that have been utilized in this analysis are shown below: Carbon dioxide: 756.4 pounds per megawatt‐hour Methane: 0.014 pounds per megawatt‐hour Nitrous oxide: 0.003 pounds per megawatt‐hour It should be noted that the use of the above intensity factors is a conservative estimate as they are based on the year 2018 rates and by opening year GHG emissions intensity factors are anticipated to be much lower. Construction Parameters Construction activities have been modeled based on the default construction schedule provided by CalEEMod for a project of this size and set for construction to be completed at the end of the year 2022. This default construction schedule is based on the project being constructed over a 14 month period and starting in October 2021. The construction‐related GHG emissions were based on a 30‐year amortization rate as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group meeting on November 19, 2009. The phases of construction activities that have been analyzed are detailed below and include: 1) Demolition, 2) Grading, 3) Building construction, 4) Application of architectural coatings, and 5) Paving. Since the project site is currently developed, the site preparation activities that consist of removal of rocks and tree stumps would not be required during construction of the proposed project. Demolition The demolition phase would consist of demolishing the existing auto dealership with service center on the project site that includes approximately 17,000 square feet of office building space and 34,300 square feet of auto service bays/canopies, which totals 51,300 square feet of building space to be demolished. In addition, approximately 4 acres of pavement (174,240 square feet) on the project site would also need to be demolished. The pavement was assumed to be an average of 4‐inches thick and weigh 145 pounds per square foot, which results in 4,211 tons of pavement that would be removed from the project site. For the existing structures, CalEEMod utilizes a factor of 0.046 tons of debris of building material per building square foot. This results in 2,360 tons of debris that would be generated from demolition of the 51,300 square feet of existing building space. Therefore, the combined demolition of the structures and pavement area would require the removal of 6,571 tons of debris that would be exported from the site and would require a total of 650 haul truck trips (average 32.5 haul truck trips per day). The demolition phase has been modeled as starting in October 2021 and occurring over four weeks. The demolition activities would require 15 worker trips per day. In order to account for water truck emissions, six vendor truck emissions were added to the demolition phase. The onsite equipment would consist of one concrete/industrial saw, three excavators and two rubber tired dozers, which is based on the CalEEMod default equipment mix. The mitigation of water all exposed areas two times per day was chosen in order to account for the fugitive dust reduction that would occur through adhering to SCAQMD 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 41 Rule 403, which requires that the Best Available Control Measures be utilized to reduce fugitive dust emissions. Grading The grading phase was modeled as starting after completion of the demolition phase and occurring over four weeks. According to Fuscoe Engineering, the rough earthwork quantities for grading include 5,000 cubic yards of cut and 1,500 cubic yards of fill, which would require approximately 3,500 cubic yards of dirt to be exported from the project site. The export of dirt would require a total of 438 haul truck trips (average 21.9 haul truck trips per day). The onsite equipment utilized during the grading phase was based on the CalEEMod default equipment list of one excavator, one grader, one rubber tired dozer, and three of either tractors, loaders, or backhoes. The grading activities would also generate 15 automobile trips per day for the workers. In order to account for water truck emissions, six daily vendor truck trips were added to the grading phase. The mitigation of water all exposed areas two times per day was chosen in order to account for the fugitive dust reduction that would occur through adhering to SCAQMD Rule 403, which requires that the Best Available Control Measures be utilized to reduce fugitive dust emissions. Building Construction The building construction would occur after the completion of the grading phase and was modeled as occurring over 11 months. The building construction phase would generate 328 worker trips and 73 vendor trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of one crane, three forklifts, one generator, one welder, and three of either tractors, loaders, or backhoes, which is based on the CalEEMod default equipment mix. Paving The paving phase was modeled as occurring after completion of the building construction phase and taking four weeks to complete. The paving phase would require up to 15 worker trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of two pavers, two paving equipment, two rollers, which is based on the CalEEMod default equipment mix. Architectural Coating The application of architectural coatings was modeled as occurring after completion of the paving phase and taking four weeks to complete. The architectural coating phase was modeled based on covering 765,677 square feet of residential interior area, 255,226 square feet of residential exterior area, 5,120 square feet of non‐residential interior area, 1,707 square feet of non‐residential exterior area, and 14,344 square feet of parking area. The architectural coating phase would generate 66 worker trip per day. The onsite equipment would consist of one air compressor, which is based on the CalEEMod default equipment mix. Operational Emissions Modeling The operations‐related criteria air pollutant emissions and GHG emissions created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CalEEMod model. The proposed project was analyzed in the CalEEMod model based on the land use parameters provided above. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 42 Mobile Sources Mobile sources include emissions the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. According to the Draft Traffic Impact Analysis 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments (Traffic Impact Analysis), prepared by Dudek, October 2019, the proposed project would generate 1,842 gross weekday vehicle trips. It should be noted that the Traffic Impact Analysis took a credit of 498 daily trips that are generated from the existing uses on the project site, however in order to provide a conservative analysis, this credit was not utilized in this analysis. Since the Traffic Impact Analysis did not provide Saturday and Sunday daily trip rates, the CalEEMod default rates have been utilized and are shown below in Table H below. According to Final Report Residential Trip Generation: Ground Counts (Virginia Transportation Research Council, 2003, found at: http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/03‐r18.pdf), which analyzed the generation of trips for residential homes found that the combined category of Trucks, Visitors and Miscellaneous generated 0.5 vehicle trips per dwelling unit. Since this category is based on three sub‐categories (i.e., trucks, visitors and miscellaneous), it was assumed that each of these subcategories generated similar trips. As such, the vehicle mix in the CalEEMod model for the proposed apartment units were adjusted so that all truck trips equate two percent of the daily trips, which results in 34 daily truck trips generated by the proposed residential apartment units. No changes were made to the shopping center land use vehicle mix or any of the other CalEEMod default mobile source parameters. Table H – Project Daily Trip Rates and Total Project Generated Trips CalEEMod Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Trip Rate1 ADT Trip Rate2 ADT Trip Rate2 ADT Apartment Mid Rise (315 DU) 5.44 1,714 6.39 2,013 5.86 1,846 Shopping Center (3.413 TSF) 37.75 129 49.97 170 25.24 86 Enclosed Parking Structure with elevator 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 Total Project Trips per Day ‐‐ 1,842 ‐‐ 2,183 ‐‐ 1,932 Notes: DU = Dwelling Units; TSF = Thousand Square Feet 1 Weekday trip rate obtained from the Traffic Impact Analysis (Dudek, 2019) 2 Saturday and Sunday trip rates obtained from CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 default values. The mobile source emissions analysis included the CalEEMod mitigation of increase density to 60 dwelling units per acre, improved pedestrian network onsite and connecting offsite, since the proposed project would include construction of an onsite pedestrian network that would connect to the existing sidewalks. In addition, the CalEEMod mitigation of increase transit accessibility was also selected in order to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 that has a bus stop located approximately 80 feet (0.02 mile) north and east of the project site, near the intersection of Loara Street and Lincoln Avenue. Area Sources Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment, hearths and architectural coatings. The area source emissions were based on the on‐going use of the proposed project in the CalEEMod model. According to the proposed project plans, no fireplaces or wood stoves would be installed into the proposed residential apartment units. However, the Landscape Plan shows that the Number 6 Recreation Center would have one communal fire table and Number 12 Large Entertainment Courtyard would have three fire pits. Since SCAQMD Rule 445 restricts the installation of wood‐burning 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 43 devices into new developments, the fire table and three fire pits were modeled as four natural gas only fireplaces in the CalEEMod model. No other changes were made to the default area source parameters in the CalEEMod model. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from electricity and natural gas used onsite. The energy usage was based on the ongoing use of the proposed project in the CalEEMod Model. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters in the CalEEMod model. The new 2019 Title 24, Part 6 building energy efficiency standards go into effect January 1, 2020 and will be required by the time the applicant obtains the building permits for the proposed project. The 2019 Title 24, Part 6 standards have been developed so that the average new home built in California will have zero‐net‐energy use. In order to account for the new 2019 Title 24, Part 6 standards, this analysis included the CalEEMod mitigation of exceed the 2016 Title 24 standards by 7 percent, since the 2019 building standards have been calculated to result in new homes using about 7 percent less energy than homes built with the 2016 building standards (https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Standar ds_FAQ.pdf Solid Waste Waste includes the GHG emissions associated with the processing of waste from the proposed project as well as the GHG emissions from the waste once it is interred into a landfill. The analysis was based on the default CalEEMod waste generation rates of 148 tons of solid waste per year generated from the proposed project. No changes were made to the default solid waste parameters or mitigation measures in the CalEEMod model. The CalEEMod mitigation of a 50 percent reduction in landfill waste was selected to account for implementation of AB 341 that provides strategies to reduce, recycle or compost solid waste by 75 percent by 2020. Only 50 percent was selected, since AB 341 builds upon the waste reduction measures of SB 939 and 1374 and therefore, it was assumed approximately 25 percent of the waste reduction target has already been accounted for in the CalEEMod model. Water and Wastewater Water includes the water used for the interior of the buildings as well as for landscaping and is based on the GHG emissions associated with the energy used to transport and filter the water. The analysis was based on the default CalEEMod water usage rate of 20,523,518 gallons per year of indoor water use and 13,093,552 gallons per year of outdoor water use. No changes were made to the default water and wastewater parameters in the CalEEMod model. The CalEEMod mitigation of the use of low flow faucets, showers, and toilets and use of smart irrigation system controllers were selected to account for the implementation of the 2016 CCR Title 24 Part 11 (CalGreen) requirements. 7.2 AERMOD Model Input Parameters The dispersion modeling utilized for analyzing diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions created from construction of the proposed project to the nearby sensitive receptors has been based on the 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 44 recommended methodology described in Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects (CAPCOA Guidance), prepared by CCAPCOA, July 2009, Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments (OEHHA Guidance), prepared by OEHHA, February 2015, and Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212, prepared by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), September 1, 2017. Important issues that affect the dispersion modeling include the following: 1) Model Selection, 2) Source Treatment, 3) Meteorological Data, and 4) Receptor Grid. Each of these issues are addressed below. Model Selection The AERMOD View Version 9.8.1 Model was used for all dispersion modeling. Key dispersion modeling options selected include the regulatory default option and urban modeling option for Orange County with a population of 3,010,759. Flagpole receptor height was set to 0 meters. AERMAP was run with a 1 degree USGS DEM Map of Santa Ana. Meteorological Data The nearest meteorological data that has been processed by SCAQMD for use in the AERMOD model is from the monitoring station at Fullerton Airport, that was utilized in this analysis. Five full years of meteorological data was collected at the Fullerton Airport Monitoring Station that included years 2012 to 2016. The base elevation for the meteorological tower was set to 29 meters. The data was obtained at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air‐quality/meteorological‐data/data‐for‐aermod Receptor Grid Discrete Receptors were placed 6 meters (20 feet) apart along the nearest edge of all structures that contain sensitive receptors that are located within 500 feet of the project site. The heights of the school receptors were set to 1 meter (3.3 feet) above ground level, in order to represent the breathing heights of children. All other receptors that are located at residential uses alternated between 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) and 4.5 meters (14.8 feet) in order to represent receptors on the first and second floors. Figure 4 shows the locations of the sources and receptors modeled in the AERMOD model. DPM Emissions Assumptions The Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF) that are defined in the OEHHA Guidance (OEHHA 2015) have been utilized in this analysis. The ASF requirements, utilize separate emission factors over a person’s life segmented into three distinct periods with the first period starting at the third trimester of a pregnancy to 2 years of age, the second period is from 2 to 16 years, and the third if from 16 to 70 years old. Since the construction emissions would occur within a 14 month period, only the age sensitivity factor for the third trimester to 2 years of age was utilized, as this represents a worst‐case assumption that a woman who is in her third trimester is living in one of the nearby homes at the start of construction and the newborn child would remain at the home through the duration of construction. Off‐Road Construction Equipment DPM Emissions Construction of the proposed project has been modeled as starting October 2021 and would be completed by the end of the year 2022. Construction activities have been modeled as occurring from 7 a.m. to 4 p.m. every day over the 14 month period. All construction activities have been assumed to occur in the first analysis period of the third trimester of a pregnancy to 2 years of age. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 45 TAC emissions from construction activities would be primarily from DPM emissions associated with the onsite operation of off‐road diesel equipment. The off‐road equipment exhaust emissions that would be created from construction of the proposed project has been calculated by the CalEEMod Model, based on the parameters detailed above in Section 7.1 for the criteria pollution analysis. Although DPM would typically be in the form of PM2.5, which is a subset of PM10, in order to provide a conservative analysis, this analysis has analyzed the exhaust PM10 emissions as DPM emissions. The CalEEMod model calculated that the off‐road equipment would generate a total of 0.1322 tons of PM10 exhaust emissions or 0.61 pounds of PM10 per day averaged over the 14 month (433 day) construction period. The off‐road equipment PM10 exhaust emissions were analyzed in the AERMOD model as a 20,044 square meter (4.95 acre) area source with a release height of 13 feet, and an initial vertical dimension of the plume of 39 feet. The emission rate was calculated by converting the 0.61 pound per day to grams per second based on a 9‐hour workday (7 a.m. to 3 p.m.) and then dividing by 20,044 square meters, which results in emission rates of 4.26E‐07 grams per second. Figure 3 shows the location of the area source. On‐Road Haul and Material Delivery Truck Running Emissions A summary of the haul and material delivery truck trips associated with construction of the project is shown in Table 6. The truck trips represent one‐way trips (i.e., either to or from project site). Table I – Project Construction Haul and Material Delivery Truck Trips Construction Phase Total Truck Trips per Construction Phase Demolition 650 Grading 438 Combined Building Construction, Paving and Architectural Coatings 16,790 Total Construction Truck Trips from the Proposed Project 17,878 Truck Trips per Day Averaged over duration of Construction1 41.3 Notes: 1 Average truck trips per day calculated by dividing the 17,878 truck trips by 433 days. Source: CalEEMod Model (see Appendix A). The onsite haul truck travel was modeled based on each truck traveling from the project driveway on Loara Street that is aligned with W Embassy Street to the main project driveway on Lincoln Avenue. The offsite truck travel was modeled as all trucks traveling on Lincoln Avenue from the main project driveway on Lincoln Avenue eastward to approximately a quarter mile east of the project site. The offsite truck travel also modeled the section of Loara Street that is located between Lincoln Avenue and W Embassy Street. The emission factors used for the roadway line volume sources were derived from the CARB EMFAC2017 Version 1.02. The parameters entered into the EMFAC2017 model included the Orange County region, calendar year of 2021, a vehicle category of T7 CAIRP Construction, model year of aggregated, speeds of 10 miles per hour for the onsite road and 35 miles per hour for the offsite roads, temperature of 55 degrees Fahrenheit, humidity of 50 percent, and set for diesel fuel. The EMFAC2017 model calculated running emission rates of 0.037 grams per second at 10 miles per hour and 0.020 grams per second at 35 miles per hour. The EMFAC2017 model run printouts are provided in Appendix B. The truck travel emissions were modeled in the AERMOD model by using line volume sources. The line volume sources were modeled with a plume height of 6 feet and plume width of 12 feet for the onsite 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 46 haul road, a plume width of 50 feet for Lincoln Avenue and a plume width of 20 feet for Loara Street. The road source emissions rates entered into the AERMOD model are shown in Table J. The road source emissions were determined by calculating the time it takes for each truck to cross the road length and then multiplying that amount of time by the daily truck operations and dividing it by 9 hours in order to determine the percent of daily running time. The daily running time was then multiplied by the EMFAC2017 emissions rates that are detailed above and were converted to grams per second. The placement of the truck travel line volume sources in the AERMOD model is shown in Exhibit 4. Table J – Construction‐Related Truck Travel Emissions Rates used in the AERMOD Model Source ID Description Daily Truck Trips1 Length of Road (Meters) DPM Emission Rates (grams/second) RDON Construction Trucks Onsite 41.3 161 4.66E‐06 RDLINCOLN Construction Trucks on Lincoln Avenue 41.3 436 6.90E‐06 RDLOARA Construction Trucks on Loara Street 41.3 121 1.91E‐06 Notes: 1 The daily truck trips represent one trip for either a truck arriving at the project site or a truck leaving the project site. Source: EMFAC2017 (see Appendix B) Haul and Material Delivery Truck Idling Emissions The haul and material delivery diesel truck idling was modeled as a point source located approximately in the middle of the project site. The analysis was based on each truck delivery idling on the project site for 10 minutes (5 minutes per trip). The 5‐minute period is based on Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations that limits commercial truck idling to 5 minutes at any location. The emissions factor used for the truck idling point source was based on the EMFAC2017 Idling Emission Rate of 0.0209 grams per hour that is shown in the EMFAC2017 model run printout provided in Appendix B. The idling point source was modeled in the AERMOD model with a 12‐foot height, a 0.1‐meter diameter, a velocity of 50 meters per second, a temperature of 366°K and an emission rate of 2.22E‐06 grams per second, which is based on a 9‐hour workday. The placement of the idling point source in the AERMOD model is shown in Figure 3. 7.3 Energy Use Calculations The proposed project is anticipated to consume energy during both construction and operation of the proposed project and the parameters utilized to calculate energy use from construction and operation of the proposed project are detailed separately below. Construction‐Related Energy Use Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to use energy in the forms of petroleum fuel for both off‐road equipment as well as from the transport of workers and materials to and from the project site and the calculations for each source are described below. Off‐Road Construction Equipment The off‐road construction equipment fuel usage was calculated through use of the CalEEMod model’s default off‐road equipment assumptions detailed above in Section 7.1. For each piece of off‐road equipment, the fuel usage was calculated through use of the 2017 Off‐road Diesel Emission Factors 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 47 spreadsheet, prepared by CARB (https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msei/ordiesel.htm). The Spreadsheet provides the following formula to calculate fuel usage from off‐road equipment: Fuel Used = Load Factor x Horsepower x Total Operational Hours x BSFC / Unit Conversion Where: Load Factor ‐ Obtained from CalEEMod default values Horsepower – Obtained from CalEEMod default values Total Operational Hours – Calculated by multiplying CalEEMod default daily hours by CalEEMod default number of working days for each phase of construction BSFC – Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (pounds per horsepower‐hour) – If less than 100 Horsepower = 0.408, if greater than 100 Horsepower = 0.367 Unit Conversion – Converts pounds to gallons = 7.109 Table K shows the off‐road construction equipment fuel calculations based on the above formula. Table K – Off‐Road Equipment and Fuel Consumption from Construction of the Proposed Project Equipment Type Equipment Quantity Horse‐ power Load Factor Operating Hours per Day Total Operational Hours1 Fuel Used (gallons) Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 0.73 8 160 543 Excavators 3 158 0.38 8 480 1,488 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 247 0.40 8 320 1,632 Grading Excavators 1 158 0.38 8 160 496 Graders 1 187 0.41 8 160 633 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 247 0.40 8 160 816 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 97 0.37 8 480 989 Building Construction Cranes 1 231 0.29 7 1,610 5,568 Forklifts 3 89 0.20 8 5,520 5,639 Generator Sets 1 84 0.74 8 1,840 6,564 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 97 0.37 7 4,830 9,949 Welders 1 46 0.45 8 1,840 2,186 Paving Pavers 2 130 0.42 8 320 902 Paving Equipment 2 132 0.36 8 320 785 Rollers 2 80 0.38 8 320 558 Architectural Coating Air Compressor 1 78 0.48 6 120 558 Total Off‐Road Equipment Fuel Used during Construction (gallons) 38,748 Notes: 1 Based on: 20 days for Demolition; 20 days for Grading; 230 days for Building Construction; 20 days for Paving; and 20 days for Painting. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 (see Appendix A); CARB, 2017. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 48 Table K shows that the off‐road equipment utilized during construction of the proposed project would consume 38,748 gallons of fuel. On‐Road Construction‐Related Vehicle Trips The on‐road construction‐related vehicle trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the construction vehicle trip assumptions from the CalEEMod model run as detailed above in Section 7.1. The calculated total construction miles was then divided by the fleet average for all of Southern California miles per gallon rates for the year 2021 calculated through use of the EMFAC2017 model (https://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2017/) and the EMFAC2017 model printouts are shown in Appendix B. Table L shows the on‐road construction vehicle trips modeled in CalEEMod and the fuel usage calculations. Table L – On‐Road Vehicle Trips and Fuel Consumption from Construction of the Proposed Project Vehicle Trip Types Daily Trips Trip Length (miles) Total Miles per Day Total Miles per Phase1 Fleet Average Miles per Gallon2 Fuel Used (gallons) Demolition Worker Trips 15 14.7 221 4,410 25.3 175 Vendor Truck Trips 6 6.9 41 828 8.0 104 Haul Truck Trips 32.5 20 650 13,000 8.0 1,631 Grading Worker Trips 15 14.7 221 4,410 25.3 175 Vendor Truck Trips 6 6.9 41 828 8.0 104 Haul Truck Trips 21.9 20 438 8,760 8.0 1,099 Building Construction Worker Trips 328 14.7 4,822 1,108,968 25.3 43,912 Vendor Truck Trips 73 6.9 504 115,851 8.0 14,537 Paving Worker Trips 15 14.7 221 4,410 25.3 175 Architectural Coating Worker Trips 66 14.7 970 19,404 25.3 768 Total Fuel Used from On‐Road Construction Vehicles (gallons) 62,680 Notes: 1 Based on: 20 days for Demolition; 20 days for Grading; 230 days for Building Construction; 20 days for Paving; and 20 days for Painting. 2 From EMFAC 2017 model (Attached to Letter). Worker Trips based on entire fleet of gasoline vehicles and Vendor Trips based on only truck fleet of diesel vehicles. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2; CARB, 2018. Table L shows that the on‐road construction‐related vehicle trips would consume 62,680 gallons of fuel and as detailed above, Table K shows that the off‐road construction equipment would consume 38,748 gallons of fuel. This would result in the total consumption of 101,428 gallons of petroleum fuel from construction of the proposed project. Operations‐Related Energy Use The operation of the proposed project is anticipated to use energy in the forms of petroleum fuel, electricity, and natural gas, and the calculations for each source are described below. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 49 Operational Petroleum Fuel The on‐road operations‐related vehicle trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the total annual vehicle miles traveled assumptions from the CalEEMod model run as detailed above in Section 7.1, which found that operation of the proposed project would generate 3,311,247 vehicle miles traveled per year. The calculated total construction miles was then divided by the Southern California fleet average rate of 25.3 miles per gallon, which was calculated through use of the EMFAC2017 model and based on the year 2021. The EMFAC2017 model printouts are shown in Appendix B. Based on the above calculation methodology, operation of the proposed project would consume 40,305 gallons per year. Operational Electricity Use The operations‐related electricity usage was calculated in the CalEEMod model run that is detailed above in Section 7.1 that found the proposed apartments will use 1,248,260 kilowatt hours (kWh) per year, the proposed parking structure will use 1,400,960 kWh per year and the proposed commercial retail space will use 39,045 kWh per year. Based on the above, it is anticipated that the proposed project would utilize 2,688,265 kWh per year of electricity. Operational Natural Gas Use The operations‐related natural gas usage was calculated in the CalEEMod model run that is provided in the Air Quality analysis that found the proposed apartments will use 3,469,300 kilo British Thermal Units (kBTU) per year, the proposed parking structure will use 0 kBTU per year and the proposed commercial retail space will use 6,599 kBTU per year. Based on the above, it is anticipated that the proposed project would utilize 3,475,899 kBTU per year of natural gas, which is equivalent to 3,476 mega‐British Thermal units (MBTU) per year of natural gas. Fi g u r e 3 Ai r D i s p e r s i o n M o d e l E m i s s i o n S o u r c e s a n d R e c e p t o r L o c a t i o n s SO U R C E : A E R M O D V i e w V e r s i o n 9 . 8 . 1 . N 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 51 8.0 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE 8.1 Regional Air Quality Many air quality impacts that derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominate pollution generators in the Air Basin, often occurs hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the Air Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table M. Table M – SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Lead Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Operation 55 55 550 150 150 55 3 Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 8.2 Local Air Quality Project‐related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project‐related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), July 2008, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The LST Methodology provides Look‐Up Tables with different thresholds based on the location and size of the project site and distance to the nearest sensitive receptors. As detailed above in Section 4.1, the project site is located in Air Monitoring Area 17, which covers the central portion of Orange County. The Look‐Up Tables provided in the LST Methodology include project site acreage sizes of 1‐acre, 2‐acres and 5‐acres. The 5‐acre project site values in the Look‐Up Tables have been utilized in this analysis, since that is the nearest size available for the 5.25‐acre project site. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School that is located adjacent to the south side of the project site. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25 meter thresholds. Table N below shows the LSTs for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 for both construction and operational activities. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 52 Table N – SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance Activity Allowable Emissions (pounds/day)1 NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction 183 1,253 13 7 Operation 183 1,253 3 2 Notes: 1 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look‐up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. 8.3 Toxic Air Contaminants According to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, any project that has the potential to expose the public to toxic air contaminants in excess of the following thresholds would be considered to have a significant air quality impact: If the Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk is 10 in one million or greater; or Toxic air contaminants from the proposed project would result in a Hazard Index increase of 1 or greater. In order to determine if the proposed project may have a significant impact related to toxic air contaminants (TACs), the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, (Diesel Analysis) prepared by SCAQMD, August 2003, recommends that if the proposed project is anticipated to create TACs through stationary sources or regular operations of diesel trucks on the project site, then the proximity of the nearest receptors to the source of the TAC and the toxicity of the hazardous air pollutant (HAP) should be analyzed through a comprehensive facility‐wide health risk assessment (HRA). 8.4 Odor Impacts The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that an odor impact would occur if the proposed project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402, which states: “A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals.” If the proposed project results in a violation of Rule 402 with regards to odor impacts, then the proposed project would create a significant odor impact. 8.5 Energy Conservation The new 2018 amendments and additions to the CEQA Checklist now includes an Energy Section that analyzes the proposed project’s energy consumption in order to avoid or reduce inefficient, wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy. Since the Energy Section was just added, no state or local agencies 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 53 have adopted specific criteria or thresholds to be utilized in an energy impact analysis. However, the 2018 Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, provide the following direction on how to analyze a project’s energy consumption: “If analysis of the project’s energy use reveals that the project may result in significant environmental effects due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, the EIR shall mitigate that energy use. This analysis should include the project’s energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation‐related energy, during construction and operation. In addition to building code compliance, other relevant considerations may include, among others, the project’s size, location, orientation, equipment use and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the project. (Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F.) This analysis is subject to the rule of reason and shall focus on energy use that is caused by the project. This analysis may be included in related analyses of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, transportation or utilities in the discretion of the lead agency.” If the proposed project creates inefficient, wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction or operation activities or conflicts with a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, then the proposed project would create a significant energy impact. 8.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Anaheim Public Utilities has adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), July 2015. The GHG Reduction Plan has been prepared to assist the City’s power supplies in conforming to the GHG emissions reductions as mandated under AB 32. The GHG Reduction Plan provides a utilities GHG emission reduction targets of 20 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020 and a 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Since the GHG Reduction Plan does not provide any quantitative GHG emissions thresholds for new development projects nor does it provide any direction on how to analyze new development projects within the City, the SCAQMD GHG emissions reduction thresholds have been utilized in this analysis. In order to identify significance criteria under CEQA for development projects, SCAQMD initiated a Working Group, which provided detailed methodology for evaluating significance under CEQA. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for all land use projects. Although the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence supporting the use of the above threshold, as of November 2017, the SCAQMD Board has not yet considered or approved the Working Group’s thresholds. It should be noted that SCAQMD’s Working Group’s thresholds were prepared prior to the issuance of Executive Order B‐30‐15 on April 29, 2015 that provided a reduction goal of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This target was codified into statute through passage of AB 197 and SB 32 in September 2016. However, to date no air district or local agency within California has provided guidance on how to address AB 197 and SB 32 with relation to land use projects. In addition, the California Supreme Court’s ruling on Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (Cleveland v. SANDAG), Filed July 13, 2017 stated: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 54 SANDAG did not abuse its discretion in declining to adopt the 2050 goal as a measure of significance in light of the fact that the Executive Order does not specify any plan or implementation measures to achieve its goal. In its response to comments, the EIR said: “It is uncertain what role regional land use and transportation strategies can or should play in achieving the EO’s 2050 emissions reduction target. A recent California Energy Commission report concludes, however, that the primary strategies to achieve this target should be major ‘decarbonization’ of electricity supplies and fuels, and major improvements in energy efficiency [citation]. Although, the above court case was referencing California’s GHG emission targets for the year 2050, at this time it is also unclear what role land use strategies can or should play in achieving the AB 197 and SB 32 reduction goal of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. As such this analysis has relied on the SCAQMD Working Group’s recommended thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would be considered to create a significant cumulative GHG impact if the proposed project would exceed the annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. The GHG emissions analysis for both construction and operation of the proposed project can be found below in Sections 9.8 and 9.9. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 55 9.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS 9.1 CEQA Thresholds of Significance Consistent with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to air quality, energy, and GHG emissions would occur if the proposed project is determined to: Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non‐attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard; Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people; Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy; Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. 9.2 Air Quality Compliance The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The following section discusses the proposed project’s consistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable General Plans and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision‐makers determine that the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 56 (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections. Criterion 1 ‐ Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this report, short‐term regional construction air emissions with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 8.1 or local thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 8.2. The ongoing operation of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions that are inconsequential on a regional basis and would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 8.1. The analysis for long‐term operational local air quality impacts showed that local pollutant concentrations would not be projected to exceed the air quality standards. Therefore, a less than significant long‐term impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, based on the information provided above, with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the proposed project would be consistent with the first criterion. Criterion 2 ‐ Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to insure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The AQMP is developed through use of the planning forecasts provided in the RTP/SCS and FTIP. The RTP/SCS is a major planning document for the regional transportation and land use network within Southern California. The RTP/SCS is a long‐range plan that is required by federal and state requirements placed on SCAG and is updated every four years. The FTIP provides long‐range planning for future transportation improvement projects that are constructed with state and/or federal funds within Southern California. Local governments are required to use these plans as the basis of their plans for the purpose of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in AQMP. The project site is currently designated as General Commercial in the General Plan and is zoned General Commercial (C‐G). The proposed mixed‐use residential and commercial retail development would require both a General Plan Amendment to Mixed‐Use and a zoning reclassification to Multi‐Family Residential (RM‐4) that allows for a minimum building site area of 1,200 square feet per dwelling unit and a Mixed‐ Use Overlay (MU) zone to allow for the commercial retail component of the proposed project. Although the proposed project is currently inconsistent with the General Plan land use designation and zoning for the project site, the proposed project would be consistent with the adjacent residential and commercial land uses and would be in substantial compliance with the Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, due to the proposed project’s consistency with the surrounding neighborhood, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designations with respect to the regional forecasts utilized by the AQMPs. Furthermore, the proposed project consists of an infill 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 57 residential development in an area of Southern California that has a shortage of housing. As such, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur in relation to implementation of the AQMP. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1 For the interior areas of the residential portion of the proposed project, the project applicant shall require that the painting contractor utilize “Super‐Compliant” VOC paints, which are defined in SCAQMD’s Rule 1113. A list of “Super‐Compliant” paints are provided at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules‐compliance/compliance/vocs/architectural‐coatings/super‐ compliant‐coatings Mitigation Measure 2 The project applicant shall require that all off‐road diesel‐powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower shall meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards and shall be registered with CARB and labelled detailing that the equipment meets Tier 4 emissions standards. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. 9.3 Cumulative Net Increase in Non‐Attainment Pollution The proposed project may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non‐attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard. The following section calculates the potential air emissions associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and compares the emissions to the SCAQMD standards. Construction Emissions The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto dealership structures and pavement on the project site, grading of the project site that would include the export of approximately 3,500 cubic yards of dirt, building construction of the proposed 381,525 square foot mixed use building and 239,072 square foot parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. The construction emissions have been analyzed for both regional and local air quality impacts. Construction‐Related Regional Impacts The CalEEMod model has been utilized to calculate the construction‐related regional emissions from the proposed project and the input parameters utilized in this analysis have been detailed in Section 7.1. The worst‐case summer or winter daily construction‐related criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed project for each phase of construction activities are shown below in Table O and the CalEEMod daily 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 58 printouts are shown in Appendix A. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table O also shows the combined regional criteria pollutant emissions from year 2022 building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table O – Construction‐Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Prior to Mitigation Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition1 Onsite 3.17 31.44 21.57 0.04 4.72 1.92 Offsite 0.32 8.96 2.97 0.03 0.80 0.24 Total 3.49 40.40 24.54 0.07 5.52 2.16 Grading1 Onsite 2.29 24.74 15.86 0.03 4.12 2.58 Offsite 0.24 6.23 2.19 0.02 0.61 0.18 Total 2.53 30.97 18.05 0.05 4.73 2.76 Building Construction (Year 2021) Onsite 1.90 17.43 16.58 0.03 0.96 0.90 Offsite 1.54 7.62 11.82 0.05 4.17 1.14 Total 3.44 25.05 28.40 0.08 5.13 2.04 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings Onsite 126.22 28.15 32.75 0.05 1.46 1.36 Offsite 1.78 7.34 13.39 0.06 4.95 1.38 Total 128.00 35.49 46.14 0.11 6.41 2.74 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 128.00 40.40 46.14 0.11 6.41 2.76 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? Yes No No No No No Notes: 1 Demolition and Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 2 Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 3 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Table O shows that the combined building construction, paving and architectural coatings activities for the proposed project would exceed the SCAQMD’s regional significance threshold for VOC emissions. The other analyzed emissions of NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 would be within the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for all phases of construction. This would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 1 is provided that requires all interior architectural coatings utilized in the residential portion of the proposed project to meet SCAQMD’s standards for “Super‐Compliant” architectural coatings, which contain 10 grams per liter of VOC or less. Mitigation Measure 2 is also provided that requires all off‐road diesel powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower to meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards. Although Mitigation Measure 2 only provides a nominal improvement to VOC emissions, Mitigation Measure 2 is required for the construction‐related cancer risk assessment provided below in Section 9.4 and has been included here to show the anticipated criteria pollutant emissions with implementation of all proposed mitigation. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 59 The CalEEMod model was re‐run with the residential interior architectural coatings set to 10 grams per liter of VOC emission (default is 50 grams per liter) and with mitigation of Tier 4 Final set for all off‐road equipment that is greater than 50 horsepower. A summary of the CalEEMod results with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 are shown in Table P and the mitigated CalEEMod printouts are provided in Appendix C. Table P – Mitigated Construction‐Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1 Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition2 Onsite3 0.46 2.00 23.28 0.04 3.23 0.54 Offsite4 0.32 8.96 2.97 0.03 0.80 0.24 Total 0.78 10.96 26.25 0.07 4.03 0.78 Grading2 Onsite 0.36 1.57 17.75 0.03 3.30 1.60 Offsite 0.24 6.23 2.19 0.02 0.61 0.18 Total 0.60 7.80 19.94 0.05 3.91 1.78 Building Construction (Year 2021) Onsite 0.59 2.74 17.68 0.03 0.11 0.11 Offsite 1.54 7.62 11.82 0.05 4.17 1.14 Total 2.13 10.36 29.50 0.08 4.28 1.25 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings Onsite 53.10 4.04 36.79 0.05 0.14 0.14 Offsite 1.78 7.34 13.39 0.06 4.95 1.38 Total 54.88 11.38 50.18 0.11 5.09 1.52 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 54.88 11.38 50.18 0.11 5.09 1.78 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Calculated emissions include implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2. 2 Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 3 Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 4 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Table P shows that with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds for criteria pollutants for any phase of construction activities. Therefore with implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Construction‐Related Local Impacts Construction‐related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 60 The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed through utilizing the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The LST Methodology found the primary criteria pollutant emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. In order to determine if any of these pollutants require a detailed analysis of the local air quality impacts, each phase of construction was screened using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look‐up Tables. The Look‐up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily onsite emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table Q shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model for the different construction phases and the calculated localized emissions thresholds that have been detailed above in Section 8.2. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently towards the end of the building construction phase, Table Q also shows the combined local criteria pollutant emissions from year 2022 building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table Q – Construction‐Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)1,2 Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition2 3.12 23.65 3.33 0.57 Grading2 2.35 18.02 3.38 1.62 Building Construction (Year 2021) 3.69 19.16 0.63 0.25 Combined Building Construction (Year 2022), Paving and Architectural Coatings 4.96 38.46 0.76 0.31 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 3.12 38.46 3.38 1.62 SCAQMD Local Construction Thresholds3 183 1,253 13 7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 The calculated emissions include implementation of Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 as shown above in Table P. 1 The Pollutant Emissions include 100% of the On‐Site emissions (off‐road equipment and fugitive dust) and 1/8 of the Off‐Site emissions (on road trucks and worker vehicles), in order to account for the on‐road emissions that occur within a ¼ mile of the project site. 2 Demolition and Grading phases based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 3 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look‐up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. The data provided in Table Q shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds during either grading, combined building construction and architectural coatings, or paving phases. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Operational Emissions The on‐going operation of the proposed project would result in a long‐term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project‐generated vehicle trips, emissions from energy usage, and onsite area source emissions created from the on‐going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long‐term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on‐going operations of the proposed project. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 61 Operations‐Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations‐related regional criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CalEEMod model and the input parameters utilized in this analysis have been detailed in Section 7.1. The worst‐case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions created from the proposed project’s long‐term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table R and the CalEEMod daily emissions printouts are shown in Appendix A. Table R – Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources1 9.11 0.37 26.09 0.00 0.15 0.15 Energy Usage2 0.10 0.88 0.37 0.01 0.07 0.07 Mobile Sources3 2.31 4.01 23.26 0.08 7.98 2.16 Total Emissions 11.52 5.26 49.72 0.09 8.20 2.38 SCQAMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, natural gas fireplaces, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of emissions from natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Source: Calculated from CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. The data provided in Table R shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants created from operation of the proposed project would exceed SCAQMD’s regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. Pursuant to the Sierra Club v. Friant Ranch Supreme Court Ruling (Case No. S219783, December 24, 2018), which found on page 6 of the ruling that EIRs need to “makes a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences.” Also, on page 24 of the ruling it states “The Court of Appeal identified several ways in which the EIR could have framed the analysis so as to adequately inform the public and decision makers of possible adverse health effects. The County could have, for example, identified the Project’s impact on the days of nonattainment per year.” Table R above shows that the primary source of operational air emissions would be created from mobile source emissions that would be generated throughout the Air Basin. As such, any adverse health impacts created from the proposed project should be assessed on a basin‐wide level. As indicated above in Table C, the Air Basin has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non‐attainment area for ozone, PM2.5, and partial non‐attainment for lead. In addition, PM10 has been designated by the State as non‐ attainment. It should be noted that VOC and NOx are ozone precursors, as such they have been considered as non‐attainment pollutants. According to the 2016 AQMP, in 2016 the total emissions of: VOC was 500 tons per year; NOx was 522 tons per year; SOx was 18 tons per year; and PM2.5 was 66 tons per year. Since the 2016 AQMP did not calculate total PM10 emissions, the total PM10 emissions were obtained from The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, for the year 2020. The project contribution to each criteria pollutant in the South Coast Air Basin is shown in Table S. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 62 Table S – Project’s Contribution to Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Emissions Source VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Project Emissions1 11.52 5.26 49.72 0.09 8.20 2.38 Total Emissions in Air Basin2 1,000,000 1,044,000 4,246,000 36,000 322,000 132,000 Project’s Percent of Air Emissions 0.0012% 0.0005% 0.0012% 0.0003% 0.0025% 0.0018% SCQAMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 From the project’s total operational emissions shown above in Table R. 2 VOC, NOx, CO, SO2 and PM2.5 from 2016 AQMP and PM10 from the California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition. As shown in Table S, the project would increase criteria pollutant emissions by as much as 0.0025 percent for PM10 in the South Coast Air Basin. Due to these nominal increases in the Air Basin‐wide criteria pollutant emissions, no increases in days of non‐attainment are anticipated to occur from operation of the proposed project. As such, operation of the project is not anticipated to result in a quantitative increase in premature deaths, asthma in children, days children will miss school, asthma‐related emergency room visits, or an increase in acute bronchitis among children due to the criteria pollutants created by the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Operations‐Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project‐related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project‐generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on‐site operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on‐site operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project‐Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards of 20 ppm over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the Air Basin was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the Air Basin and in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the Air Basin was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO hot spot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles1 during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict a violation of CO standards. Since the nearby intersections to the proposed project are much smaller with less traffic than what was analyzed 1 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway; Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 63 by the SCAQMD, no local CO Hotspot are anticipated to be created from the proposed project and no CO Hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, a less than significant long‐term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on‐going use of the proposed project. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations Project‐related air emissions from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances may have the potential to create emissions areas that exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from onsite operations were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look‐up Tables and the methodology described in LST Methodology. The Look‐up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table N shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes area sources, energy usage, and vehicles operating in the immediate vicinity of the project site and the calculated emissions thresholds. Table T – Operations‐Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Onsite Emission Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources 0.37 26.09 0.15 0.15 Energy Usage 0.88 0.37 0.07 0.07 Onsite Vehicle Emissions1 0.50 2.91 1.00 0.27 Total Emissions 1.75 29.37 1.22 0.49 SCAQMD Local Operational Thresholds2 183 1,253 3 2 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Onsite vehicle emissions based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions, which is the estimated portion of vehicle emissions occurring within a quarter mile of the project site. 2 The nearest offsite sensitive receptors include multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet (14 meters) to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School located adjacent to the south side of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25 meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look‐up Tables for five acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. The data provided in Table T shows that the on‐going operations of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 9.2. Therefore, the on‐going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations‐related impact to local air quality due to onsite emissions and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 provided above in Section 9.2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 64 Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. 9.4 Sensitive Receptors The proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The local concentrations of criteria pollutant emissions produced in the nearby vicinity of the proposed project, which may expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations have been calculated above in Section 9.3 for both construction and operations, which are discussed separately below. The discussion below also includes an analysis of the potential impacts from toxic air contaminant emissions. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the multi‐family homes located as near as 45 feet to the west side of the project site and Loara Elementary School that is located adjacent to the south side of the project site. Construction‐Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto dealership structures and pavement on the project site, grading of the project site, building construction of the proposed mixed use building and parking structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. Construction activities may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of localized criteria pollutant concentrations and from toxic air contaminant emissions created from onsite construction equipment, which are described below. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Construction The local air quality impacts from construction of the proposed project has been analyzed above in Section 9.3 and found that the construction of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 8.2. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would create a less than significant construction‐related impact to local air quality and no mitigation would be required. Toxic Air Contaminants Impacts from Construction The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. Health risks from TACs are twofold. First, TACs are carcinogens according to the State of California. Second, short‐term acute and long‐term chronic exposure to TACs can cause health effects to the respiratory system. Each of these health risks is discussed below. Construction‐Related Cancer Risks from DPM Emissions According to the OEHHA Guidance (OEHHA, 2015) and Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1 and 212, (SCAQMD, 2017), the cancer risk should be calculated using the following formula: Cancer Risk = [Dose‐inh (mg/(Kg‐day)] * [Cancer Potency Factor (kg‐day)/mg]*[1x106] * Age Sensitivity Factor * Fraction of Time at Home Dose‐inh = (Cair * DBR * A * EF * ED * 106) / AT Where: Cair [Concentration in air (µg/m3)] = (Calculated by AERMOD Model) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 65 DBR [Daily breathing rate (L/kg body weight – day)] A [Inhalation absorption factor] EF [Exposure frequency (days/year)] ED [Exposure duration (years)] 106 [Micrograms to milligrams conversion] AT [Average time period over which exposure is averaged in days] The cancer risk parameters used in this evaluation for both the nearby residential uses and nearby school uses are shown in Table U. Table U – Cancer Risk Calculation Parameters Parameter Residential Uses School Uses Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg‐day) for DPM 1.1 1.1 Daily Breathing Rate1 (L/kg body weight‐day) 934 934 Inhalation Absorption Factor 1 1 Exposure Frequency (days/year) 350 250 Exposure Duration2 (years) 1.2 1.2 Age Sensitivity Factor 10 10 Fraction of Time at Home 1.0 1.0 Averaging Time3 (days) 25,550 25,550 Potential Cancer Risk = Cair * 169 Cair * 121 Notes: 1 Based on 95th percentile breathing rate of 361 for 3rd trimester for 3 months and 1,090 for 0 to 2 years for 11 months (OEHHA, 2015; SCAQMD, 2017). 2 Based on the duration of construction activities for the proposed project, which was obtained from the default construction schedule provided in the CalEEMod model. 3 Based on a 70‐year average lifetime (OEHHA, 2015; SCAQMD, 2017) As shown above in Table U, the potential cancer risk for residential receptors equates to Cair * 169 and for school receptors equates to Cair * 121. Table V provides a summary of the maximum calculated DPM concentrations at each nearby sensitive receptor as well as the coordinates of the receptor where the maximum DPM concentration was measured for each nearby sensitive receptor. Table V also shows the calculated cancer risk based on whether it the receptor is located at either a nearby residential or school use, which have been based on the parameters detailed above in Table U. The AERMOD model run printouts are provided in Appendix D. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 66 Table V – Construction‐Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Prior to Mitigation Sensitive Receiver Land Use Receptor Location1 Annual DPM Concentration (µg/m3) Cancer Risk Per Million People2 X Y 1631 Pampas Lane MFR 413,160 3,743,879 0.813 137.3 1651 Pampas Lane MFR 413,076 3,743,854 0.323 54.5 1655 Pampas Lane MFR 413,052 3,743,854 0.270 45.6 1675 Pampas Lane MFR 413,030 3,743,856 0.233 39.3 1666 Pampas Lane MFR 413,038 3,743,770 0.169 28.5 1650 Pampas Lane MFR 413,075 3,743,770 0.203 34.3 229 S Loara St SFR 413,238 3,743,742 0.268 45.3 Loara Elementary School School 413,224 3,743,746 0.289 34.8 Fairmont Private School School 413,388 3,743,746 0.144 17.4 SCAQMD Threshold 10 Exceed Threshold? Yes Notes: 1 Receptor location based on World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). 2 The residential cancer risk based on: Cair * 169. The school cancer risk based on Cair * 121. Source: Calculated from ISC‐AERMOD View Version 9.8.1. Table V shows that the proposed project’s construction‐related DPM emissions would result in a cancer risk as high as 137.3 per million persons at the nearby sensitive receptors. The cancer risk calculated at all analyzed sensitive receptors would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 per million. This would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 2 has been provided that requires all off‐road diesel powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower to meet the Tier 4 Final emissions standards. The CalEEMod model was re‐ run with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2 (see Appendix C), which found that with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the off‐road diesel powered construction equipment would create a total of 0.01791 tons of PM10 exhaust or 0.083 pounds per day of PM10 exhaust from construction of the proposed project. For reference, implementation of Mitigation Measure 2 would reduce the off‐road equipment PM10 exhaust by 86 percent. The AERMOD model was re‐run with the emission rate for the area source that represents the off‐road equipment PM10 exhaust changed to 5.78E‐08 grams per second, that was calculated by converting the 0.083 pound per day to grams per second based on a 9‐hour workday (7 a.m. to 3 p.m.) and then dividing by 20,044 square meters. No other changes were made to the AERMOD model run. A summary of the AERMOD results with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2 are shown in Table W and the mitigated AERMOD printouts are provided in Appendix E. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 67 Table W – Mitigated Construction‐Related Cancer Risks at Nearby Sensitive Receptors Sensitive Receiver Land Use Receptor Location1 Annual DPM Concentration (µg/m3) Cancer Risk Per Million People2 X Y 1631 Pampas Lane MFR 413,160 3,743,879 0.013 2.2 1651 Pampas Lane MFR 413,076 3,743,854 0.004 0.6 1655 Pampas Lane MFR 413,052 3,743,854 0.003 0.5 1675 Pampas Lane MFR 413,030 3,743,856 0.003 0.4 1666 Pampas Lane MFR 413,038 3,743,770 0.001 0.3 1650 Pampas Lane MFR 413,075 3,743,770 0.002 0.3 229 S Loara St SFR 413,238 3,743,742 0.003 0.5 Loara Elementary School School 413,224 3,743,746 0.003 0.4 Fairmont Private School School 413,388 3,743,746 0.002 0.2 SCAQMD Threshold 10 Exceed Threshold? No Notes: 1 Receptor location based on World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84), Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM). 2 The residential cancer risk based on: Cair * 169. The school cancer risk based on Cair * 121. Source: Calculated from ISC‐AERMOD View Version 9.8.1. Table W shows that with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the DPM emissions created from construction of the proposed project would not result in a cancer risk that exceeds SCAQMD’s thresholds for any nearby sensitive receptor. Therefore with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, construction of the proposed project would not create a significant cancer risk to the nearby sensitive receptors. Construction‐Related Non‐Cancer Risks from DPM Emissions In addition to the cancer risk from exposure to TAC emissions there is also the potential TAC exposure may result in adverse health impacts from acute and chronic illnesses, which are detailed below. Chronic Health Impacts Chronic health effects are characterized by prolonged or repeated exposure to a TAC over many days, months, or years. Symptoms from chronic health impacts may not be immediately apparent and are often irreversible. The chronic hazard index is based on the most impacted sensitive receptor from the proposed project and is calculated from the annual average concentrations of PM10. The relationship for non‐cancer chronic health effects is given by the equation: HIDPM = CDPM / RELDPM Where, HIDPM = Hazard Index; an expression of the potential for non‐cancer health effects. CDPM = Annual average diesel particulate matter concentration in g/m3. RELDPM= Reference Exposure Level (REL) for diesel particulate matter; the diesel particulate matter concentration at which no adverse health effects are anticipated. The RELDPM is 5 µg/m3. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as protective for the respiratory system has established this concentration. As shown above in Table W shows that with 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 68 implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, the AERMOD model found that the highest annual DPM concentration of 0.013 µg/m3 for DPM chronic non‐cancer risk emissions. The resulting Hazard Index is: HIDPM = 0.013 / 5 = 0.0026 The criterion for significance is a Chronic Hazard Index increase of 1.0 or greater, which is detailed above in Section 5.0. Therefore, the non‐cancer chronic health risks from construction of the proposed project to the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. Acute Health Impacts Acute health effects are characterized by sudden and severe exposure and rapid absorption of a TAC. Normally, a single large exposure is involved. Acute health effects are often treatable and reversible. The acute hazard index is calculated from the maximum 1‐hour concentrations of PM10 at the point of maximum impact (PMI), which has been calculated with the AERMOD model with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2 (see Appendix C). The relationship for non‐cancer acute health effects is given by the equation: AHI = C / AREL Where, AHI = Acute Hazard Index; an expression of the potential for non‐cancer health effects. C = Maximum hourly concentration of either PM10 in g/m3. AREL = Acute Reference Exposure Level. No acute risk has been found to be directly created from DPM, so there is no AREL assigned to DPM, however in order to provide an DPM equivalent AREL, the ARELs from all of the other TACs that are emitted in diesel exhaust were added together based on their diesel weighting shown above in Table A. This resulted in a diesel emission weighted equivalent AREL of 137 µg/m3. The AERMOD model found that the highest 1‐hour concentration at the PMI is 0.614 µg/m3 for DPM equivalent acute non‐cancer risk emissions. The resulting Hazard Index is: AHI = 0.614 / 137 = 0.00448 The criterion for significance is an Acute Hazard Index increase of 1.0 or greater, which is detailed above in Section 5.0. Therefore, the non‐cancer acute health risks from construction of the proposed project to the nearby sensitive receptors would be less than significant. As such, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2, construction of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Operations‐Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The on‐going operations of the proposed project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of local CO emission impacts from the project‐generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions. Local criteria pollutant impacts from onsite operations, and toxic air contaminant impacts. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 69 Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project‐Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The analysis provided above in Section 9.3 shows that no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of offsite sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the proposed project would occur from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, natural gas only fireplaces, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances. The analysis provided above in Section 9.3 found that the operation of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 8.2. Therefore, the on‐going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations‐related impact to local air quality due to on‐site emissions and no mitigation would be required. Operations‐Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. As detailed above in Section 7.1 under operational mobile emissions, the proposed residential portion of the project is anticipated to generate approximately 34 daily truck trips and the CalEEMod model (see Appendices A and C) calculated that the retail portion of the project would generate 8 daily trips, which would result in a total of 42 daily truck trips generated from the project. A trip is either to the project site or from the project site to another location, so the 42 daily truck trips would equate to 21 daily truck deliveries. According to Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Project, prepared by CAPCOA, July 2009, recommends that sensitive receptors should not be placed near distribution centers that generate more than 100 truck deliveries per day or more than 40 truck deliveries per day with transport refrigeration units (TRUs). Since the proposed project would generate well below the 100 trucks per day threshold that would have the potential to create a significant TAC impact at the nearby sensitive receptors as determined by CAPCOA’s screening criteria, a less than significant TAC impact would occur during the on‐going operations of the proposed project and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Level of Significance Before Mitigation Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 2 provided above in Section 9.2. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 70 Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. 9.5 Odor Emissions Adversely Affecting a Substantial Number of People The proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Individual responses to odors are highly variable and can result in a variety of effects. Generally, the impact of an odor results from a variety of factors such as frequency, duration, offensiveness, location, and sensory perception. The frequency is a measure of how often an individual is exposed to an odor in the ambient environment. The intensity refers to an individual’s or group’s perception of the odor strength or concentration. The duration of an odor refers to the elapsed time over which an odor is experienced. The offensiveness of the odor is the subjective rating of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of an odor. The location accounts for the type of area in which a potentially affected person lives, works, or visits; the type of activity in which he or she is engaged; and the sensitivity of the impacted receptor. Sensory perception has four major components: detectability, intensity, character, and hedonic tone. The detection (or threshold) of an odor is based on a panel of responses to the odor. There are two types of thresholds: the odor detection threshold and the recognition threshold. The detection threshold is the lowest concentration of an odor that will elicit a response in a percentage of the people that live and work in the immediate vicinity of the project site and is typically presented as the mean (or 50 percent of the population). The recognition threshold is the minimum concentration that is recognized as having a characteristic odor quality, this is typically represented by recognition by 50 percent of the population. The intensity refers to the perceived strength of the odor. The odor character is what the substance smells like. The hedonic tone is a judgment of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor. The hedonic tone varies in subjective experience, frequency, odor character, odor intensity, and duration. Potential odor impacts have been analyzed separately for construction and operations below. Construction‐Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of coatings such as asphalt pavement, paints and solvents and from emissions from diesel equipment. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process would be temporary and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the project site’s boundaries. Due to the transitory nature of construction odors, a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Operations‐Related Odor Impacts The proposed project would consist of the development of 315 residential apartment units 3,413 square feet of retail space. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on‐going operations of the proposed project would primarily occur from the trash storage areas. Pursuant to City regulations, permanent trash enclosures that protect trash bins from rain as well as limit air circulation would be required for the trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402 and City trash storage regulations, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on‐going operations of the proposed project. Therefore, a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 71 9.6 Energy Consumption The proposed project would impact energy resources during construction and operation. Energy resources that would be potentially impacted include electricity, natural gas, and petroleum based fuel supplies and distribution systems. This analysis includes a discussion of the potential energy impacts of the proposed projects, with particular emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. A general definition of each of these energy resources are provided below. Electricity, a consumptive utility, is a man‐made resource. The production of electricity requires the consumption or conversion of energy resources, including water, wind, oil, gas, coal, solar, geothermal, and nuclear resources, into energy. The delivery of electricity involves a number of system components, including substations and transformers that lower transmission line power (voltage) to a level appropriate for on‐site distribution and use. The electricity generated is distributed through a network of transmission and distribution lines commonly called a power grid. Conveyance of electricity through transmission lines is typically responsive to market demands. In 2018, the City of Anaheim Public Utilities provided 2,306.51 Gigawatt‐hours per year of electricity to the City (http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyutil.aspx). Natural gas is a combustible mixture of simple hydrocarbon compounds (primarily methane) that is used as a fuel source. Natural gas consumed in California is obtained from naturally occurring reservoirs, mainly located outside the State, and delivered through high‐pressure transmission pipelines. The natural gas transportation system is a nationwide network and, therefore, resource availability is typically not an issue. Natural gas satisfies almost one‐third of the State’s total energy requirements and is used in electricity generation, space heating, cooking, water heating, industrial processes, and as a transportation fuel. Natural gas is measured in terms of cubic feet. In 2018, Orange County consumed 575.12 Million Therms of natural gas2. Petroleum‐based fuels currently account for a majority of the California’s transportation energy sources and primarily consist of diesel and gasoline types of fuels. However, the state has been working on developing strategies to reduce petroleum use. Over the last decade California has implemented several policies, rules, and regulations to improve vehicle efficiency, increase the development and use of alternative fuels, reduce air pollutants and GHG emissions from the transportation sector, and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Accordingly, petroleum‐based fuel consumption in California has declined. In 2015, 15.1 billion gallons of gasoline was sold in the State3. Diesel represents 17 percent of total fuel sales behind gasoline and in 2015, 4.2 billion gallons of diesel was sold in California4. The following section calculates the potential energy consumption associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and provides a determination if any energy utilized by the proposed project is wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Construction Energy The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing auto dealership structures and pavement on the project site, grading of the project site, building construction of the proposed 381,525 square foot mixed use building and 239,072 square foot parking 2 Obtained from: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx 3 Obtained from: https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/ 4 Obtained from: https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/diesel.html 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 72 structure, paving of onsite roads and driveways, and application of architectural coatings. The proposed project would consume energy resources during construction in three (3) general forms: 1. Petroleum‐based fuels used to power off‐road construction vehicles and equipment on the Project Site, construction worker travel to and from the Project Site, as well as delivery and haul truck trips (e.g. hauling of demolition material to off‐site reuse and disposal facilities); 2. Electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during Project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power; and, 3. Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Construction‐Related Electricity During construction the proposed project would consume electricity to construct the new structures and infrastructure. Electricity would be supplied to the project site by Anaheim Public Utilities and would be obtained from the existing electrical lines in the vicinity of the project site. The use of electricity from existing power lines rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered generators would minimize impacts on energy use. Electricity consumed during project construction would vary throughout the construction period based on the construction activities being performed. Various construction activities include electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. Such electricity demand would be temporary, nominal, and would cease upon the completion of construction. Overall, construction activities associated with the proposed project would require limited electricity consumption that would not be expected to have an adverse impact on available electricity supplies and infrastructure. Therefore, the use of electricity during project construction would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Since the project site already has electrical service, it is anticipated that only nominal improvements would be required to Anaheim Public Utilities distribution lines and equipment with development of the proposed project. Where feasible, the new service installations and connections would be scheduled and implemented in a manner that would not result in electrical service interruptions to other properties. Compliance with City’s guidelines and requirements would ensure that the proposed project fulfills its responsibilities relative to infrastructure installation, coordinates any electrical infrastructure removals or relocations, and limits any impacts associated with demolition, grading, construction, and development. Construction of the project’s electrical infrastructure is not anticipated to adversely affect the electrical infrastructure serving the surrounding uses or utility system capacity. Construction‐Related Natural Gas Construction of the proposed project typically would not involve the consumption of natural gas. Natural gas would not be supplied to support construction activities, thus there would be no demand generated by construction. Since the project site is currently developed that currently has natural gas service to the project site, construction of the proposed project would be limited to installation of new natural gas connections within the project site. Development of the proposed project would likely not require extensive infrastructure improvements to serve the project site. Construction‐related energy usage 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 73 impacts associated with the installation of natural gas connections are expected to be confined to trenching in order to place the lines below surface. In addition, prior to ground disturbance, the proposed project would notify and coordinate with SoCalGas to identify the locations and depth of all existing gas lines and avoid disruption of gas service. Therefore, construction‐related impacts to natural gas supply and infrastructure would be less than significant. Construction‐Related Petroleum Fuel Use Petroleum‐based fuel usage represents the highest amount of transportation energy potentially consumed during construction, which would utilized by both off‐road equipment operating on the project site and on‐road automobiles transporting workers to and from the project site and on‐road trucks transporting equipment and supplies to the project site. The off‐road construction equipment fuel usage was calculated through use of the off‐road equipment assumptions and fuel use assumptions shown above in Section 7.3, which found that the off‐road equipment utilized during construction of the proposed Project would consume 38,748 gallons of fuel. The on‐road construction trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the construction vehicle trip assumptions and fuel use assumptions shown above in Section 7.3, which found that the on‐road trips generated from construction of the proposed Project would consume 62,680 gallons of fuel. As such, the combined fuel used from off‐road construction equipment and on‐road construction trips for the proposed Project would result in the consumption of 101,428 gallons of petroleum fuel. This equates to 0.00053 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed in the State annually. As such, the construction‐ related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current petroleum usage rates. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be required to adhere to all State and SCAQMD regulations for off‐road equipment and on‐road trucks, which provide minimum fuel efficiency standards. As such, construction activities for the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Impacts regarding transportation energy would be less than significant. Development of the Project would not result in the need to manufacture construction materials or create new building material facilities specifically to supply the proposed project. It is difficult to measure the energy used in the production of construction materials such as asphalt, steel, and concrete, it is reasonable to assume that the production of building materials such as concrete, steel, etc., would employ all reasonable energy conservation practices in the interest of minimizing the cost of doing business. Operational Energy The on‐going operation of the of 315 residential apartment units, 3,413 square feet of retail space, and 639 space parking structure would require the use of energy resources for multiple purposes including, but not limited to, gas pumps, heating/ventilating/air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, lighting, appliances, and electronics. Energy would also be consumed during operations related to water usage, solid waste disposal, landscape equipment and vehicle trips. Operations‐Related Electricity Operation of the proposed project would result in consumption of electricity at the project site. As detailed above in Section 7.3 the proposed project would consume 2,688,265 kilowatt‐hours per year of electricity. This equates to 0.12 percent of the electricity consumed annually by Anaheim Public Utilities. As such, the operations‐related electricity use would be nominal, when compared to current electricity usage rates in the City. It should be noted that, the proposed project would comply with all Federal, State, 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 74 and City requirements related to the consumption of electricity, that includes CCR Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards. The CCR Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed buildings, including enhanced insulation, use of energy efficient lighting and appliances as well as requiring a variety of other energy‐efficiency measures to be incorporated into all of the proposed structures. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project will be designed and built to minimize electricity use and that existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s electricity demand. Thus, impacts with regard to electrical supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations‐Related Natural Gas Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of natural gas at the project site. As detailed above in Section 7.3 the proposed project would consume 3,476 MBTU per year of natural gas. This equates to 0.006 percent of the natural gas consumed annually in Orange County. As such, the operations‐related natural gas use would be nominal, when compared to current natural gas usage rates in the County. It should be noted that, the proposed project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of natural gas, that includes CCR Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards. The CCR Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed structures, including enhanced insulation as well as use of efficient natural gas appliances and HVAC units. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project will be designed and built to minimize natural gas use and that existing and planned natural gas capacity and natural gas supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s natural gas demand. Thus, impacts with regard to natural gas supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations‐Related Vehicular Petroleum Fuel Usage Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of petroleum‐based fuels related to vehicular travel to and from the project site. As detailed above in Section 7.3 the proposed project would consume 40,305 gallons of petroleum fuel per year from vehicle travel. This equates to 0.00021 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed in the State annually. As such, the operations‐ related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current petroleum usage rates. It should be noted that, the proposed project would comply with all Federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of transportation energy that includes California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11 California Green Building Standards that require the proposed project to provide 19 parking spaces with electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces that are designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project will be designed and built to minimize transportation energy through the promotion of the use of clean air vehicles, including electric‐powered vehicles and it is anticipated that existing and planned capacity and supplies of transportation fuels would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s demand. Thus, impacts with regard transportation energy supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. In conclusion, the proposed project would comply with regulatory compliance measures outlined by the State and City related to Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG), Transportation/Circulation, and Water Supply. Additionally, the proposed project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable City Building and Fire Codes. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 75 or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 9.7 Energy Plan Consistency The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The applicable energy plan for the proposed project is the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, adopted May 2004. The proposed project’s consistency with the energy conservation policies from the General Plan are shown in Table X. Table X – Proposed Project Compliance with the General Plan Energy Conservation Policies General Plan Policy Proposed Project Implementation Actions Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and information provided on the City’s website. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable to City Staff for maintain the City’s website. Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling, effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). Consistent. The proposed project has been designed to orient buildings to maximize exposure to cooling and the landscape plan has been designed to locate landscaping to shade structures. Encourage energy‐efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. Not Applicable. The proposed project consists of the demolition of the existing structures on the project site and construction of new buildings. No existing structures would remain onsite that could be retrofitted. Continue to provide free energy audits for the public. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable for the City as a service that the City provides. Source: City of Anaheim, 2004. As shown in Table X, the proposed project would be consistent with all applicable energy conservation policies from the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 9.8 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project would consist of development of 315 residential apartment units, 3,413 square feet of retail space, and 639 space parking structure. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The City of Anaheim has adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, July 2015, that details measures for the City that includes new development within the City to implement in order to meet the State’s 2030 GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 baseline levels. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 76 In order to show consistency with the GHG Reduction Plan, quantification of the proposed project’s GHG emissions are not required. As such, the proposed project’s GHG emissions have been provided for informational purposes only. The project’s GHG emissions have been calculated with the CalEEMod model based on the construction and operational parameters detailed above in Section 7.1. A summary of the results is shown below in Table Y and the CalEEMod model run is provided in Appendix F. Table Y – Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Category CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Area Sources1 6.28 0.01 0.00 6.42 Energy Usage2 1,085.08 0.02 0.01 1,087.66 Mobile Sources3 1,100.88 0.04 0.00 1,101.77 Solid Waste4 15.07 0.89 0.00 37.34 Water and Wastewater5 126.39 0.54 0.01 143.94 Construction6 31.26 0.00 0.00 31.35 Total GHG Emissions 2,364.95 1.50 0.02 2,408.47 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance 3,000 Notes: 1 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, hearths, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4 Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6 Construction emissions amortized over 30 years as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group on November 19, 2009. Source: CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. The data provided in Table Y shows that the proposed project would create 2,408.47 MTCO2e per year. For reference purposes Table Y also shows, the SCAQMD’s draft threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e, which the proposed project would be within this threshold. . As detailed below in Section 9.9, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable measures in the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from development of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 9.9 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Anaheim Public Utilities adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), July 2015. The GHG Reduction Plan was prepared to assist the City’s power supplies in conforming to the GHG emissions reductions as mandated under AB 32. The GHG Reduction Plan provides a utilities GHG emission reduction targets of 20 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020 and a 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The Plan provides reduction targets for energy usage, photovoltaic (PV) rooftop installations, and use of electric vehicles. For energy usage, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of a 15 percent reduction by 2020 and a 30 percent reduction by 2030 of the energy utilized by homes in Anaheim. This target will be met through application of State regulations including CCR Title 24, Part 6. The 2019 Title 24 Building Standards will go 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 77 into effect on January 1, 2020 and will be required to be met for the proposed project’s structures. Homes built with the 2019 Standards will use about 7 percent less energy than the current 2016 Standards. It should also be noted that the 2016 Title 24 Standards included new energy‐efficiency requirements that resulted in new homes being 15 percent more efficient than the 2013 Title 24 Part 6 Standards that were in effect at the time of the preparation of the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the proposed project will meet the energy use reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. For PV rooftop installations, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 27,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2020 and 37,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2030. This target will be met through application of State regulations including Title 24, Part 6. The 2019 Title 24 Building Standards require that new high‐rise residential structures, such as the proposed project are constructed to be solar ready to facilitate the installation of rooftop solar systems. This requirement is typically met through structural design to ensure that rooftops are designed to handle the weight of PV systems and through installation of electrical conduit from the main circuit panel area to the roof. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the proposed project will meet the PV rooftop installation targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. For electric vehicles, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 2,000 low or zero emission vehicles by 2020 and 5,000 low or zero emission vehicles by 2030. As detailed on the site plan for the proposed project, 19 parking spaces would have electric vehicle charging stations and 4 parking spaces would be designated as clean air vehicles only spaces. Therefore, development of the proposed project will assist the City in meeting the electric vehicle usage targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. As detailed above, development of the proposed project would meet the targets outlined in the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with the GHG Reduction Plan reduction targets and would not conflict with the applicable plan for reducing GHG emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 78 10.0 REFERENCES Breeze Software, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), California Emissions Estimator Model User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2, October 2017. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Gasoline Service Station Industrywide Risk Assessment Guidelines, November 1997. California Air Resources Board, 2017 Off‐Road Diesel Emission Factor Update for NOx and PM, 2017. California Air Resources Board, Appendix VII Risk Characterization Scenarios, October 2000. California Air Resources Board, First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, May 2014. California Air Resources Board, Resolution 08‐43, December 12, 2008. California Air Resources Board, Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, on October 24, 2008. California Air Resources Board, Final Staff Report Proposed Update to the SB 375 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets, October 2017. California Air Resources Board, The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition. California Department of Conservation, A General Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos, August, 2000. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan, May 2004. City of Anaheim, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan Sustainable Electric & Water Initiatives, July 2015. Dudek, Draft Traffic Impact Analysis 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments City of Anaheim, October 2019. Environmental Protection Agency, Nonattainment Major New Source Review Implementation Under 8‐ Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard: Reconsideration, June 30, 2005. Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990‐2016. International Code Council, Guide to the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code Nonresidential, January 2017. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, June 1, 2007. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod, February 2011. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 79 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, December, 2012. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, March, 2017. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised July 2008. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised Draft – 2012 Lead State Implementation Plan Los Angeles County, May 4, 2012. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 402 Nuisance, Adopted May 7, 1976. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 403 Fugitive Dust, Amended June 3, 2005. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1108 Cutback Asphalt, Amended February 1, 1985. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1108.1 Emulsified Asphalt, Amended November 4, 1983. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings, Amended September 6, 2013. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1143 Consumer Paint Thinners & Multi‐Purpose Solvents, Amended December 3, 2010. South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, March 2015. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Report Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin, MATES III, January 2008. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Report Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin, MATES‐IV, October 2014. Southern California Association of Governments, 2016‐2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, April 2016. Southern California Association of Governments, 2015 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) Guidelines, October 2013. University of California, Davis, Transportation Project‐Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol, December 1997. U.S. Geological Survey, Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences of Asbestos in California, 2011. 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix A APPENDIX A CalEEMod Model Daily Prior to Mitigation Printouts 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 639.00 Space 1.75 239,072.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 315.00 Dwelling Unit 3.42 378,112.00 901 Regional Shopping Center 3.41 1000sqft 0.08 3,413.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 756.4 0.014CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.003N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 1 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - GHG Intensity Factors reduced by 51% to account for GHG reductions between the default year 2007 values and 2018 values. Land Use - Total Project Site 5.25 acres Construction Phase - Construction schedule provided by applicant Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips per day added to Demolition and Grading phases to account for water truck emissions Demolition - 51,300 sq ft of building space to be demolished (2,360 tons) + 4 acres of paved area (4,211 tons) = 6,571 tons of debris Grading - 3,500 cubic yards of dirt exported from project site Vehicle Trips - Daily trip rates from Traffic Report Woodstoves - No Woodstoves or Wood Fireplaces. 4 Natural Gas Fireplaces included to account for the proposed Fire Table and three Fire Pits. Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requirements, water exposure 2x per day selected Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Urban, 60 Dwelling Units/acre, 0.02 mile to transit selected to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 and Improve Pedestrian Network Onsite and Connecting Offsite Energy Mitigation - Exceed Title 24 by 7% selected to account for the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards Water Mitigation - Install low flow fixtures and water-efficient irrigation selected to account for Title 24 Part 11 requirements Waste Mitigation - 50% reduction in waste selected to account for AB 341. Fleet Mix - Apartment vehicle mix adjusted so that trucks equal 2% of all trips. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces NumberGas 267.75 4.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 15.75 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.59 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.22 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7840e-003 2.0000e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.9410e-003 5.0000e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 2 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix MH 9.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.7750e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.9800e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5240e-003 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,500.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 255,600.00 239,072.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 315,000.00 378,112.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,410.00 3,413.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.75 1.75 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.29 3.42 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.014 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 756.4 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 15.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 15.75 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 3 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4693 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 7.8025 1.5796 9.3820 3.5304 1.4680 4.6163 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 2022 123.6332 22.7437 27.4549 0.0781 4.1327 0.8447 4.9773 1.1065 0.7944 1.9009 0.0000 7,820.547 7 7,820.547 7 0.8281 0.0000 7,841.250 5 Maximum 123.6332 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 7.8025 1.5796 9.3820 3.5304 1.4680 4.6163 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4693 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 4.1327 1.5796 5.5152 1.6766 1.4680 2.7626 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 2022 123.6332 22.7437 27.4549 0.0781 4.1327 0.8447 4.9773 1.1065 0.7944 1.9009 0.0000 7,820.547 7 7,820.547 7 0.8281 0.0000 7,841.250 5 Maximum 123.6332 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 4.1327 1.5796 5.5152 1.6766 1.4680 2.7626 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.75 0.00 26.93 39.98 0.00 28.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 4 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Mobile 2.8341 5.4884 39.5276 0.1467 15.1878 0.0978 15.2856 4.0346 0.0903 4.1249 14,732.26 81 14,732.26 81 0.4316 14,743.05 84 Total 12.0516 6.7656 66.0034 0.1543 15.1878 0.3209 15.5087 4.0346 0.3134 4.3480 0.0000 16,026.35 04 16,026.35 04 0.5009 0.0229 16,045.68 61 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mobile 2.3083 3.8713 23.2600 0.0788 7.9267 0.0564 7.9832 2.1057 0.0521 2.1578 7,914.641 3 7,914.641 3 0.2486 7,920.857 0 Total 11.5219 5.1156 49.7218 0.0862 7.9267 0.2769 8.2036 2.1057 0.2725 2.3782 0.0000 9,166.636 7 9,166.636 7 0.3171 0.0221 9,181.147 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 5 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/22/2021 11/18/2021 5 20 2 Grading Grading 11/19/2021 12/16/2021 5 20 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/17/2021 11/3/2022 5 230 4 Paving Paving 11/4/2022 12/1/2022 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/2/2022 12/29/2022 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.40 24.39 24.67 44.15 47.81 13.72 47.10 47.81 13.04 45.30 0.00 42.80 42.80 36.69 3.37 42.78 Residential Indoor: 765,677; Residential Outdoor: 255,226; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,120; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,707; Striped Parking Area: 14,344 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10 Acres of Paving: 1.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 6 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 6.00 650.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 438.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 328.00 73.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 66.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 7 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0306 0.0000 7.0306 1.0645 0.0000 1.0645 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 7.0306 1.5513 8.5820 1.0645 1.4411 2.5056 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 8 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2341 8.2620 2.2697 0.0245 0.5658 0.0260 0.5918 0.1549 0.0248 0.1797 2,738.508 0 2,738.508 0 0.2839 2,745.606 0 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.3042 8.8576 2.8780 0.0276 0.7718 0.0282 0.8001 0.2104 0.0270 0.2373 3,057.612 6 3,057.612 6 0.3000 3,065.111 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.1638 0.0000 3.1638 0.4790 0.0000 0.4790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.1638 1.5513 4.7151 0.4790 1.4411 1.9201 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 9 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2341 8.2620 2.2697 0.0245 0.5658 0.0260 0.5918 0.1549 0.0248 0.1797 2,738.508 0 2,738.508 0 0.2839 2,745.606 0 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.3042 8.8576 2.8780 0.0276 0.7718 0.0282 0.8001 0.2104 0.0270 0.2373 3,057.612 6 3,057.612 6 0.3000 3,065.111 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5721 0.0000 6.5721 3.3705 0.0000 3.3705 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 6.5721 1.1599 7.7320 3.3705 1.0671 4.4376 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 10 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1577 5.5673 1.5294 0.0165 0.3813 0.0175 0.3988 0.1044 0.0167 0.1211 1,845.333 1 1,845.333 1 0.1913 1,850.1161 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.2279 6.1630 2.1377 0.0196 0.5873 0.0198 0.6070 0.1599 0.0189 0.1787 2,164.437 7 2,164.437 7 0.2074 2,169.621 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9575 0.0000 2.9575 1.5167 0.0000 1.5167 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 2.9575 1.1599 4.1174 1.5167 1.0671 2.5838 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 11 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1577 5.5673 1.5294 0.0165 0.3813 0.0175 0.3988 0.1044 0.0167 0.1211 1,845.333 1 1,845.333 1 0.1913 1,850.1161 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.2279 6.1630 2.1377 0.0196 0.5873 0.0198 0.6070 0.1599 0.0189 0.1787 2,164.437 7 2,164.437 7 0.2074 2,169.621 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 12 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1948 6.8484 1.8573 0.0180 0.4664 0.0142 0.4806 0.1342 0.0136 0.1478 1,962.185 3 1,962.185 3 0.1539 1,966.031 8 Worker 1.1839 0.7163 9.9623 0.0346 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,451.196 8 3,451.196 8 0.0739 3,453.044 4 Total 1.3787 7.5648 11.8196 0.0526 4.1327 0.0380 4.1706 1.1065 0.0355 1.1420 5,413.382 1 5,413.382 1 0.2278 5,419.076 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 13 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1948 6.8484 1.8573 0.0180 0.4664 0.0142 0.4806 0.1342 0.0136 0.1478 1,962.185 3 1,962.185 3 0.1539 1,966.031 8 Worker 1.1839 0.7163 9.9623 0.0346 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,451.196 8 3,451.196 8 0.0739 3,453.044 4 Total 1.3787 7.5648 11.8196 0.0526 4.1327 0.0380 4.1706 1.1065 0.0355 1.1420 5,413.382 1 5,413.382 1 0.2278 5,419.076 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 14 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1831 6.4791 1.7934 0.0178 0.4664 0.0124 0.4788 0.1342 0.0118 0.1461 1,942.914 1 1,942.914 1 0.1490 1,946.640 2 Worker 1.1189 0.6490 9.2981 0.0333 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,323.300 0 3,323.300 0 0.0671 3,324.978 1 Total 1.3020 7.1281 11.0915 0.0511 4.1327 0.0357 4.1683 1.1065 0.0333 1.1398 5,266.214 1 5,266.214 1 0.2162 5,271.618 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 15 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1831 6.4791 1.7934 0.0178 0.4664 0.0124 0.4788 0.1342 0.0118 0.1461 1,942.914 1 1,942.914 1 0.1490 1,946.640 2 Worker 1.1189 0.6490 9.2981 0.0333 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,323.300 0 3,323.300 0 0.0671 3,324.978 1 Total 1.3020 7.1281 11.0915 0.0511 4.1327 0.0357 4.1683 1.1065 0.0333 1.1398 5,266.214 1 5,266.214 1 0.2162 5,271.618 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 16 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Total 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 17 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Total 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 123.2035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 123.4081 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 18 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Total 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 123.2035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 123.4081 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 19 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Total 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 20 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3083 3.8713 23.2600 0.0788 7.9267 0.0564 7.9832 2.1057 0.0521 2.1578 7,914.641 3 7,914.641 3 0.2486 7,920.857 0 Unmitigated 2.8341 5.4884 39.5276 0.1467 15.1878 0.0978 15.2856 4.0346 0.0903 4.1249 14,732.26 81 14,732.26 81 0.4316 14,743.05 84 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 1,713.60 2,012.85 1845.90 6,066,299 3,166,096 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 128.73 170.40 86.07 278,112 145,151 Total 1,842.33 2,183.25 1,931.97 6,344,411 3,311,247 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 21 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.593000 0.045000 0.220000 0.116000 0.005000 0.002000 0.007000 0.007000 0.000000 0.000000 0.005000 0.000000 0.000000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Regional Shopping Center 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 22 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9862.05 0.1064 0.9089 0.3868 5.8000e- 003 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 1,160.241 7 1,160.241 7 0.0222 0.0213 1,167.136 4 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.7014 2.0000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 2.2002 2.2002 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2132 Total 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9.50494 0.1025 0.8760 0.3727 5.5900e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 1,118.2280 1,118.2280 0.0214 0.0205 1,124.873 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.0180795 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 2.1270 2.1270 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.1397 Total 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 23 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 24 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 25 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 26 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer Institute Recycling and Composting Services 11.0 Vegetation 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 27 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 639.00 Space 1.75 239,072.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 315.00 Dwelling Unit 3.42 378,112.00 901 Regional Shopping Center 3.41 1000sqft 0.08 3,413.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 756.4 0.014CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.003N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 1 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - GHG Intensity Factors reduced by 51% to account for GHG reductions between the default year 2007 values and 2018 values. Land Use - Total Project Site 5.25 acres Construction Phase - Construction schedule provided by applicant Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips per day added to Demolition and Grading phases to account for water truck emissions Demolition - 51,300 sq ft of building space to be demolished (2,360 tons) + 4 acres of paved area (4,211 tons) = 6,571 tons of debris Grading - 3,500 cubic yards of dirt exported from project site Vehicle Trips - Daily trip rates from Traffic Report Woodstoves - No Woodstoves or Wood Fireplaces. 4 Natural Gas Fireplaces included to account for the proposed Fire Table and three Fire Pits. Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requirements, water exposure 2x per day selected Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Urban, 60 Dwelling Units/acre, 0.02 mile to transit selected to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 and Improve Pedestrian Network Onsite and Connecting Offsite Energy Mitigation - Exceed Title 24 by 7% selected to account for the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards Water Mitigation - Install low flow fixtures and water-efficient irrigation selected to account for Title 24 Part 11 requirements Waste Mitigation - 50% reduction in waste selected to account for AB 341. Fleet Mix - Apartment vehicle mix adjusted so that trucks equal 2% of all trips. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces NumberGas 267.75 4.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 15.75 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.59 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.22 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7840e-003 2.0000e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.9410e-003 5.0000e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 2 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix MH 9.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.7750e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.9800e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5240e-003 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,500.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 255,600.00 239,072.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 315,000.00 378,112.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,410.00 3,413.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.75 1.75 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.29 3.42 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.014 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 756.4 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 15.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 15.75 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 3 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4831 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 7.8025 1.5801 9.3826 3.5304 1.4685 4.6167 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 2022 123.6636 22.7881 26.8948 0.0758 4.1327 0.8451 4.9778 1.1065 0.7949 1.9014 0.0000 7,594.785 8 7,594.785 8 0.8315 0.0000 7,615.572 0 Maximum 123.6636 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 7.8025 1.5801 9.3826 3.5304 1.4685 4.6167 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4831 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 4.1327 1.5801 5.5157 1.6766 1.4685 2.7629 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 2022 123.6636 22.7881 26.8948 0.0758 4.1327 0.8451 4.9778 1.1065 0.7949 1.9014 0.0000 7,594.785 8 7,594.785 8 0.8315 0.0000 7,615.572 0 Maximum 123.6636 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 4.1327 1.5801 5.5157 1.6766 1.4685 2.7629 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.75 0.00 26.93 39.98 0.00 28.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 4 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Mobile 2.7700 5.7530 37.4121 0.1394 15.1878 0.0980 15.2857 4.0346 0.0905 4.1251 14,001.65 91 14,001.65 91 0.4252 14,012.28 90 Total 11.9875 7.0303 63.8879 0.1470 15.1878 0.3211 15.5088 4.0346 0.3136 4.3481 0.0000 15,295.74 14 15,295.74 14 0.4945 0.0229 15,314.91 67 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mobile 2.2556 4.0080 22.6313 0.0749 7.9267 0.0566 7.9833 2.1057 0.0523 2.1580 7,523.060 2 7,523.060 2 0.2483 7,529.267 5 Total 11.4692 5.2523 49.0930 0.0823 7.9267 0.2770 8.2038 2.1057 0.2727 2.3784 0.0000 8,775.055 6 8,775.055 6 0.3168 0.0221 8,789.558 2 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 5 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/22/2021 11/18/2021 5 20 2 Grading Grading 11/19/2021 12/16/2021 5 20 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/17/2021 11/3/2022 5 230 4 Paving Paving 11/4/2022 12/1/2022 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/2/2022 12/29/2022 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.32 25.29 23.16 44.02 47.81 13.71 47.10 47.81 13.03 45.30 0.00 42.63 42.63 35.94 3.37 42.61 Residential Indoor: 765,677; Residential Outdoor: 255,226; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,120; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,707; Striped Parking Area: 14,344 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10 Acres of Paving: 1.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 6 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 6.00 650.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 438.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 328.00 73.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 66.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 7 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0306 0.0000 7.0306 1.0645 0.0000 1.0645 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 7.0306 1.5513 8.5820 1.0645 1.4411 2.5056 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 8 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2398 8.3595 2.3827 0.0241 0.5658 0.0264 0.5923 0.1549 0.0253 0.1802 2,697.013 6 2,697.013 6 0.2903 2,704.270 5 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.3179 8.9571 2.9706 0.0271 0.7718 0.0287 0.8006 0.2104 0.0274 0.2378 3,003.701 8 3,003.701 8 0.3067 3,011.370 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.1638 0.0000 3.1638 0.4790 0.0000 0.4790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.1638 1.5513 4.7151 0.4790 1.4411 1.9201 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 9 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2398 8.3595 2.3827 0.0241 0.5658 0.0264 0.5923 0.1549 0.0253 0.1802 2,697.013 6 2,697.013 6 0.2903 2,704.270 5 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.3179 8.9571 2.9706 0.0271 0.7718 0.0287 0.8006 0.2104 0.0274 0.2378 3,003.701 8 3,003.701 8 0.3067 3,011.370 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5721 0.0000 6.5721 3.3705 0.0000 3.3705 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 6.5721 1.1599 7.7320 3.3705 1.0671 4.4376 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 10 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1616 5.6331 1.6056 0.0163 0.3813 0.0178 0.3991 0.1044 0.0170 0.1214 1,817.372 2 1,817.372 2 0.1956 1,822.262 3 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.2397 6.2306 2.1935 0.0192 0.5873 0.0201 0.6074 0.1599 0.0192 0.1791 2,124.060 5 2,124.060 5 0.2121 2,129.362 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9575 0.0000 2.9575 1.5167 0.0000 1.5167 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 2.9575 1.1599 4.1174 1.5167 1.0671 2.5838 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 11 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1616 5.6331 1.6056 0.0163 0.3813 0.0178 0.3991 0.1044 0.0170 0.1214 1,817.372 2 1,817.372 2 0.1956 1,822.262 3 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.2397 6.2306 2.1935 0.0192 0.5873 0.0201 0.6074 0.1599 0.0192 0.1791 2,124.060 5 2,124.060 5 0.2121 2,129.362 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 12 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2045 6.8323 2.0376 0.0176 0.4664 0.0148 0.4812 0.1342 0.0141 0.1483 1,913.979 7 1,913.979 7 0.1614 1,918.014 3 Worker 1.3404 0.7871 9.1928 0.0328 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,266.329 6 3,266.329 6 0.0699 3,268.078 2 Total 1.5448 7.6194 11.2304 0.0503 4.1327 0.0385 4.1712 1.1065 0.0360 1.1425 5,180.309 3 5,180.309 3 0.2313 5,186.092 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 13 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2045 6.8323 2.0376 0.0176 0.4664 0.0148 0.4812 0.1342 0.0141 0.1483 1,913.979 7 1,913.979 7 0.1614 1,918.014 3 Worker 1.3404 0.7871 9.1928 0.0328 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,266.329 6 3,266.329 6 0.0699 3,268.078 2 Total 1.5448 7.6194 11.2304 0.0503 4.1327 0.0385 4.1712 1.1065 0.0360 1.1425 5,180.309 3 5,180.309 3 0.2313 5,186.092 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 14 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1923 6.4594 1.9647 0.0174 0.4664 0.0129 0.4792 0.1342 0.0123 0.1465 1,895.001 8 1,895.001 8 0.1560 1,898.902 6 Worker 1.2700 0.7130 8.5667 0.0315 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,145.450 4 3,145.450 4 0.0635 3,147.037 2 Total 1.4623 7.1724 10.5314 0.0489 4.1327 0.0361 4.1688 1.1065 0.0337 1.1402 5,040.452 2 5,040.452 2 0.2195 5,045.939 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 15 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1923 6.4594 1.9647 0.0174 0.4664 0.0129 0.4792 0.1342 0.0123 0.1465 1,895.001 8 1,895.001 8 0.1560 1,898.902 6 Worker 1.2700 0.7130 8.5667 0.0315 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,145.450 4 3,145.450 4 0.0635 3,147.037 2 Total 1.4623 7.1724 10.5314 0.0489 4.1327 0.0361 4.1688 1.1065 0.0337 1.1402 5,040.452 2 5,040.452 2 0.2195 5,045.939 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 16 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Total 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 17 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Total 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 123.2035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 123.4081 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 18 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Total 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 123.2035 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 123.4081 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 19 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Total 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 20 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.2556 4.0080 22.6313 0.0749 7.9267 0.0566 7.9833 2.1057 0.0523 2.1580 7,523.060 2 7,523.060 2 0.2483 7,529.267 5 Unmitigated 2.7700 5.7530 37.4121 0.1394 15.1878 0.0980 15.2857 4.0346 0.0905 4.1251 14,001.65 91 14,001.65 91 0.4252 14,012.28 90 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 1,713.60 2,012.85 1845.90 6,066,299 3,166,096 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 128.73 170.40 86.07 278,112 145,151 Total 1,842.33 2,183.25 1,931.97 6,344,411 3,311,247 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 21 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.593000 0.045000 0.220000 0.116000 0.005000 0.002000 0.007000 0.007000 0.000000 0.000000 0.005000 0.000000 0.000000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Regional Shopping Center 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 22 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9862.05 0.1064 0.9089 0.3868 5.8000e- 003 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 1,160.241 7 1,160.241 7 0.0222 0.0213 1,167.136 4 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.7014 2.0000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 2.2002 2.2002 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2132 Total 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9.50494 0.1025 0.8760 0.3727 5.5900e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 1,118.2280 1,118.228 0 0.0214 0.0205 1,124.873 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.0180795 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 2.1270 2.1270 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.1397 Total 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 23 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 24 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 25 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 26 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter Institute Recycling and Composting Services 11.0 Vegetation 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:57 PMPage 27 of 27 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Winter 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix B APPENDIX B EMFAC2017 Model Printouts EM F A C 2 0 1 7 (v 1 . 0 . 2 ) Em i s s i o n Ra t e s ca l e n d a r _ y e a r s e a s o n _ m su b _ a r e a v e h i c l e _ c l a s s t e m p e r a t u r e r e l a t i v e _ h u pr o c e s s s p e e d _ t i m e p o l l u t a n t e m i s s i o n _ r a t e 20 2 1 A n n u a l O r a n g e (S C T7 CA I R P Co n s t r u c t i o n 5 5 5 0 R U N E X 1 0 P M 1 0 0 . 0 3 6 5 6 1 20 2 1 A n n u a l O r a n g e (S C T7 CA I R P Co n s t r u c t i o n 5 5 5 0 R U N E X 3 5 P M 1 0 0 . 0 1 9 9 7 3 20 2 1 A n n u a l O r a n g e (S C T7 CA I R P Co n s t r u c t i o n I D L E X P M 1 0 0 . 0 2 0 9 0 6 20 2 1 A n n u a l O r a n g e (S C T7 CA I R P Co n s t r u c t i o n P M T W P M 1 0 0 . 0 3 6 20 2 1 A n n u a l O r a n g e (S C T7 CA I R P Co n s t r u c t i o n P M B W P M 1 0 0 . 0 6 1 7 4 EM F A C 2 0 1 7 (v 1 . 0 . 2 ) Em i s s i o n s In v e n t o r y Re g i o n Ty p e : Ai r Ba s i n Re g i o n : SO U T H CO A S T Ca l e n d a r Ye a r : 20 2 1 Se a s o n : An n u a l Ve h i c l e Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n : EM F A C 2 0 0 7 Ca t e g o r i e s Un i t s : mi l e s / d a y fo r VM T , tr i p s / d a y fo r Tr i p s , to n s / d a y fo r Em i s s i o n s , 10 0 0 ga l l o n s / d a y fo r Fu e l Co n s u m p t i o n Re g i o n C a l e n d a r Ye a r V e h i c l e Ca t Mo d e l Ye a r S p e e d F u e l P o p u l a t i o n V M T T r i p s F u e l Co n s u m p t i o n SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 H H D T A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 8 1 7 6 2 9 1 6 2 8 1 . 9 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D A A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 6 2 7 6 2 3 4 2 4 6 1 8 1 2 7 6 2 9 6 4 7 1 8 6 8 1 9 5 . 8 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D T 1 A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 6 9 5 1 4 6 2 6 0 6 6 0 4 2 3 2 0 0 4 1 7 1 0 0 9 . 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D T 2 A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 2 1 4 4 8 0 4 8 1 9 9 1 2 3 6 1 0 0 5 2 3 4 2 3 4 4 1 . 7 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L H D T 1 A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 1 7 2 4 3 0 6 2 3 0 8 0 5 2 5 6 8 9 5 3 5 9 8 . 1 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L H D T 2 A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 2 8 9 1 4 1 0 1 4 3 1 5 4 3 0 7 7 3 1 1 1 . 8 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M C Y A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 2 7 9 2 0 9 1 9 5 8 6 7 7 5 5 8 4 1 9 5 3 . 9 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M D V A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 1 5 2 0 8 7 7 5 4 4 2 1 1 7 3 7 0 2 6 6 4 6 2 8 0 8 . 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M H A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 3 4 5 5 6 3 2 7 7 2 1 3 4 5 7 6 4 . 5 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M H D T A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 2 4 6 8 4 1 3 2 5 2 1 0 4 9 3 8 7 0 2 6 4 . 5 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 O B U S A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 5 8 4 5 2 4 6 4 7 7 1 1 6 9 5 5 4 9 . 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 S B U S A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 2 4 1 5 9 8 0 9 9 9 6 6 0 1 0 . 9 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 U B U S A g g r e g a t e d A g g r e g a t e d G A S 9 4 4 8 8 7 2 9 3 7 7 6 1 8 . 5 ve h i c l e mi l e s pe r da y (A l l Ca t e g o r i e s ) 4 1 9 9 5 7 3 9 1 1 6 , 6 2 9 1, 0 0 0 ga l l pe r da y 16 , 6 2 9 , 1 8 8 ga l l o n s pe r da y Fl e e t Av g Mi l e s pe r ga l l o n 2 5 . 3 EM F A C 2 0 1 7 (v 1 . 0 . 2 ) Em i s s i o n s In v e n t o r y Re g i o n Ty p e : Ai r Ba s i n Re g i o n : SO U T H CO A S T Ca l e n d a r Ye a r : 20 2 1 Se a s o n : An n u a l Ve h i c l e Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n : EM F A C 2 0 0 7 Ca t e g o r i e s Un i t s : mi l e s / d a y fo r VM T , tr i p s / d a y fo r Tr i p s , to n s / d a y fo r Em i s s i o n s , 10 0 0 ga l l o n s / d a y fo r Fu e l Co n s u m p t i o n Re g i o n C a l e n d a r Y V e h i c l e Ca t Mo d e l Ye a S p e e d F u e l P o p u l a t i o n V M T T r i p s F u e l Co n s u m p t i o n SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 H H D T A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 9 6 7 2 7 1 1 5 4 5 8 2 0 9 7 4 4 0 6 1 7 7 4 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D A A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 5 3 7 1 0 2 1 8 5 2 3 9 2 5 4 8 4 0 4 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D T 1 A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 4 0 6 9 5 2 0 1 4 2 0 0 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L D T 2 A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 1 2 4 7 2 5 4 8 3 9 4 6 1 7 1 8 1 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L H D T 1 A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 1 0 9 6 1 0 4 4 8 9 6 7 0 1 3 7 8 7 5 6 2 1 1 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 L H D T 2 A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 4 3 2 4 2 1 7 3 0 6 2 9 5 4 3 9 3 3 9 0 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M D V A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 2 9 6 0 4 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 4 5 6 0 5 4 6 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M H A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 1 1 8 2 9 1 1 5 3 6 6 1 1 8 3 1 1 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 M H D T A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 1 1 9 0 7 5 7 5 3 5 1 4 7 1 1 9 2 8 5 5 7 2 7 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 O B U S A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 4 1 3 1 3 0 8 8 8 7 4 0 3 9 0 3 8 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 S B U S A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 6 3 1 4 1 9 9 4 7 7 7 2 8 6 3 2 7 SO U T H CO A 20 2 1 U B U S A g g r e g a t e d Ag g r e g a t e d DS L 1 4 1 4 7 8 5 7 0 Di e s e l Tr u c k (H H D T , MD V , MH D T ) ve h i c l e mi l e s pe r da y 2 0 , 3 0 3 , 0 8 0 2, 5 4 8 1, 0 0 0 ga l l pe r da y 2, 5 4 7 , 6 8 1 ga l l o n s pe r da y Di e s e l Tr u c k Fl e e t Av g Mi l e s pe r ga l l o n 8 . 0 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix C APPENDIX C CalEEMod Model Mitigated Daily Printouts 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 639.00 Space 1.75 239,072.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 315.00 Dwelling Unit 3.42 378,112.00 901 Regional Shopping Center 3.41 1000sqft 0.08 3,413.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 756.4 0.014CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.003N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation Orange County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 1 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer Project Characteristics - GHG Intensity Factors reduced by 51% to account for GHG reductions between the default year 2007 values and 2018 values. Land Use - Total Project Site 5.25 acres Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on Opening Year of 2023 Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips per day added to Demolition and Grading phases to account for water truck emissions Demolition - 51,300 sq ft of building space to be demolished (2,360 tons) + 4 acres of paved area (4,211 tons) = 6,571 tons of debris Grading - 3,500 cubic yards of dirt exported from project site Architectural Coating - Mitigation - Residential Interior Super Compliant Paint 10 grams VOC per liter of Less Vehicle Trips - Daily trip rates from Traffic Report Woodstoves - No Woodstoves or Wood Fireplaces. 4 Natural Gas Fireplaces included to account for the proposed Fire Table and three Fire Pits. Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water Exposed Area 2 times per day selected to account for SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requirements. Mitigation Tier 4 Final Equipment greater than 50 HP Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Urban, 60 Dwelling Units/acre, 0.02 mile to transit selected to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 and Improve Pedestrian Network Onsite and Connecting Offsite Energy Mitigation - Exceed Title 24 by 7% selected to account for the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards Water Mitigation - Install low flow fixtures and water-efficient irrigation selected to account for Title 24 Part 11 requirements Waste Mitigation - 50% reduction in waste selected to account for AB 341. Fleet Mix - Apartment vehicle mix adjusted so that trucks equal 2% of all trips. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 50.00 10.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 2 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblFireplaces NumberGas 267.75 4.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 15.75 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.59 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.22 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7840e-003 2.0000e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.9410e-003 5.0000e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 3 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix MH 9.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.7750e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.9800e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5240e-003 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 22.50 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,500.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 255,600.00 239,072.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 315,000.00 378,112.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,410.00 3,413.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.75 1.75 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.29 3.42 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.014 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 756.4 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 15.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 15.75 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 4 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4693 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 7.8222 1.5796 9.3820 3.6019 1.4680 4.6879 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 2022 52.6549 22.7437 27.4549 0.0781 4.1327 0.8447 4.9773 1.1065 0.7944 1.9009 0.0000 7,820.547 7 7,820.547 7 0.8281 0.0000 7,841.250 5 Maximum 52.6549 40.2983 28.3948 0.0795 7.8222 1.5796 9.3820 3.6019 1.4680 4.6879 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 1.9653 10.8609 29.5019 0.0795 4.1327 0.1499 4.2826 1.7088 0.1474 1.7761 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 2022 52.4801 9.8217 28.7507 0.0781 4.1327 0.1374 4.2701 1.1065 0.1350 1.2415 0.0000 7,820.547 7 7,820.547 7 0.8281 0.0000 7,841.250 5 Maximum 52.4801 10.8609 29.5019 0.0795 4.1327 0.1499 4.2826 1.7088 0.1474 1.7761 0.0000 7,966.746 0 7,966.746 0 1.3549 0.0000 7,987.840 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.99 67.19 -4.30 0.00 30.86 88.15 40.44 40.21 87.52 54.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 5 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Mobile 2.8341 5.4884 39.5276 0.1467 15.1878 0.0978 15.2856 4.0346 0.0903 4.1249 14,732.26 81 14,732.26 81 0.4316 14,743.05 84 Total 12.0516 6.7656 66.0034 0.1543 15.1878 0.3209 15.5087 4.0346 0.3134 4.3480 0.0000 16,026.35 04 16,026.35 04 0.5009 0.0229 16,045.68 61 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mobile 2.3083 3.8713 23.2600 0.0788 7.9267 0.0564 7.9832 2.1057 0.0521 2.1578 7,914.641 3 7,914.641 3 0.2486 7,920.857 0 Total 11.5219 5.1156 49.7218 0.0862 7.9267 0.2769 8.2036 2.1057 0.2725 2.3782 0.0000 9,166.636 7 9,166.636 7 0.3171 0.0221 9,181.147 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 6 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/22/2021 11/18/2021 5 20 2 Grading Grading 11/19/2021 12/16/2021 5 20 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/17/2021 11/3/2022 5 230 4 Paving Paving 11/4/2022 12/1/2022 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/2/2022 12/29/2022 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.40 24.39 24.67 44.15 47.81 13.72 47.10 47.81 13.04 45.30 0.00 42.80 42.80 36.69 3.37 42.78 Residential Indoor: 765,677; Residential Outdoor: 255,226; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,120; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,707; Striped Parking Area: 14,344 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 22.5 Acres of Paving: 1.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 7 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 6.00 650.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 438.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 328.00 73.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 66.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 8 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0306 0.0000 7.0306 1.0645 0.0000 1.0645 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 7.0306 1.5513 8.5820 1.0645 1.4411 2.5056 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 9 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2341 8.2620 2.2697 0.0245 0.5658 0.0260 0.5918 0.1549 0.0248 0.1797 2,738.508 0 2,738.508 0 0.2839 2,745.606 0 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.3042 8.8576 2.8780 0.0276 0.7718 0.0282 0.8001 0.2104 0.0270 0.2373 3,057.612 6 3,057.612 6 0.3000 3,065.111 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.1638 0.0000 3.1638 0.4790 0.0000 0.4790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 3.1638 0.0616 3.2254 0.4790 0.0616 0.5407 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 10 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2341 8.2620 2.2697 0.0245 0.5658 0.0260 0.5918 0.1549 0.0248 0.1797 2,738.508 0 2,738.508 0 0.2839 2,745.606 0 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.3042 8.8576 2.8780 0.0276 0.7718 0.0282 0.8001 0.2104 0.0270 0.2373 3,057.612 6 3,057.612 6 0.3000 3,065.111 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.2349 0.0000 7.2349 3.4421 0.0000 3.4421 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 7.2349 1.1599 8.3949 3.4421 1.0671 4.5092 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 11 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1577 5.5673 1.5294 0.0165 0.3813 0.0175 0.3988 0.1044 0.0167 0.1211 1,845.333 1 1,845.333 1 0.1913 1,850.1161 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.2279 6.1630 2.1377 0.0196 0.5873 0.0198 0.6070 0.1599 0.0189 0.1787 2,164.437 7 2,164.437 7 0.2074 2,169.621 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.2557 0.0000 3.2557 1.5489 0.0000 1.5489 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.3632 1.5737 17.7527 0.0296 0.0484 0.0484 0.0484 0.0484 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 0.3632 1.5737 17.7527 0.0296 3.2557 0.0484 3.3041 1.5489 0.0484 1.5973 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 12 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1577 5.5673 1.5294 0.0165 0.3813 0.0175 0.3988 0.1044 0.0167 0.1211 1,845.333 1 1,845.333 1 0.1913 1,850.1161 Vendor 0.0160 0.5629 0.1527 1.4800e- 003 0.0383 1.1700e- 003 0.0395 0.0110 1.1200e- 003 0.0122 161.2755 161.2755 0.0127 161.5917 Worker 0.0541 0.0328 0.4556 1.5800e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 157.8291 157.8291 3.3800e- 003 157.9136 Total 0.2279 6.1630 2.1377 0.0196 0.5873 0.0198 0.6070 0.1599 0.0189 0.1787 2,164.437 7 2,164.437 7 0.2074 2,169.621 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 13 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1948 6.8484 1.8573 0.0180 0.4664 0.0142 0.4806 0.1342 0.0136 0.1478 1,962.185 3 1,962.185 3 0.1539 1,966.031 8 Worker 1.1839 0.7163 9.9623 0.0346 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,451.196 8 3,451.196 8 0.0739 3,453.044 4 Total 1.3787 7.5648 11.8196 0.0526 4.1327 0.0380 4.1706 1.1065 0.0355 1.1420 5,413.382 1 5,413.382 1 0.2278 5,419.076 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.5867 2.7396 17.6822 0.0269 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 0.5867 2.7396 17.6822 0.0269 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 14 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1948 6.8484 1.8573 0.0180 0.4664 0.0142 0.4806 0.1342 0.0136 0.1478 1,962.185 3 1,962.185 3 0.1539 1,966.031 8 Worker 1.1839 0.7163 9.9623 0.0346 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,451.196 8 3,451.196 8 0.0739 3,453.044 4 Total 1.3787 7.5648 11.8196 0.0526 4.1327 0.0380 4.1706 1.1065 0.0355 1.1420 5,413.382 1 5,413.382 1 0.2278 5,419.076 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 15 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1831 6.4791 1.7934 0.0178 0.4664 0.0124 0.4788 0.1342 0.0118 0.1461 1,942.914 1 1,942.914 1 0.1490 1,946.640 2 Worker 1.1189 0.6490 9.2981 0.0333 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,323.300 0 3,323.300 0 0.0671 3,324.978 1 Total 1.3020 7.1281 11.0915 0.0511 4.1327 0.0357 4.1683 1.1065 0.0333 1.1398 5,266.214 1 5,266.214 1 0.2162 5,271.618 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.5608 2.6936 17.6592 0.0269 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 0.5608 2.6936 17.6592 0.0269 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 16 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1831 6.4791 1.7934 0.0178 0.4664 0.0124 0.4788 0.1342 0.0118 0.1461 1,942.914 1 1,942.914 1 0.1490 1,946.640 2 Worker 1.1189 0.6490 9.2981 0.0333 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,323.300 0 3,323.300 0 0.0671 3,324.978 1 Total 1.3020 7.1281 11.0915 0.0511 4.1327 0.0357 4.1683 1.1065 0.0333 1.1398 5,266.214 1 5,266.214 1 0.2162 5,271.618 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 17 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Total 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 18 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Total 0.0512 0.0297 0.4252 1.5200e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 151.9802 151.9802 3.0700e- 003 152.0569 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 52.2253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 52.4298 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 19 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Total 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 52.2253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 52.2550 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 20 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Total 0.2251 0.1306 1.8710 6.7000e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 668.7128 668.7128 0.0135 669.0505 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 21 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3083 3.8713 23.2600 0.0788 7.9267 0.0564 7.9832 2.1057 0.0521 2.1578 7,914.641 3 7,914.641 3 0.2486 7,920.857 0 Unmitigated 2.8341 5.4884 39.5276 0.1467 15.1878 0.0978 15.2856 4.0346 0.0903 4.1249 14,732.26 81 14,732.26 81 0.4316 14,743.05 84 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 1,713.60 2,012.85 1845.90 6,066,299 3,166,096 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 128.73 170.40 86.07 278,112 145,151 Total 1,842.33 2,183.25 1,931.97 6,344,411 3,311,247 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 22 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.593000 0.045000 0.220000 0.116000 0.005000 0.002000 0.007000 0.007000 0.000000 0.000000 0.005000 0.000000 0.000000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Regional Shopping Center 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 23 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9862.05 0.1064 0.9089 0.3868 5.8000e- 003 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 1,160.241 7 1,160.241 7 0.0222 0.0213 1,167.136 4 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.7014 2.0000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 2.2002 2.2002 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2132 Total 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9.50494 0.1025 0.8760 0.3727 5.5900e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 1,118.2280 1,118.2280 0.0214 0.0205 1,124.873 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.0180795 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 2.1270 2.1270 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.1397 Total 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 24 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 25 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 26 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 27 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer Institute Recycling and Composting Services 11.0 Vegetation 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 28 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Summer 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 639.00 Space 1.75 239,072.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 315.00 Dwelling Unit 3.42 378,112.00 901 Regional Shopping Center 3.41 1000sqft 0.08 3,413.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 756.4 0.014CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.003N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation Orange County, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 1 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter Project Characteristics - GHG Intensity Factors reduced by 51% to account for GHG reductions between the default year 2007 values and 2018 values. Land Use - Total Project Site 5.25 acres Construction Phase - Construction schedule based on Opening Year of 2023 Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips per day added to Demolition and Grading phases to account for water truck emissions Demolition - 51,300 sq ft of building space to be demolished (2,360 tons) + 4 acres of paved area (4,211 tons) = 6,571 tons of debris Grading - 3,500 cubic yards of dirt exported from project site Architectural Coating - Mitigation - Residential Interior Super Compliant Paint 10 grams VOC per liter of Less Vehicle Trips - Daily trip rates from Traffic Report Woodstoves - No Woodstoves or Wood Fireplaces. 4 Natural Gas Fireplaces included to account for the proposed Fire Table and three Fire Pits. Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water Exposed Area 2 times per day selected to account for SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requirements. Mitigation Tier 4 Final Equipment greater than 50 HP Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Urban, 60 Dwelling Units/acre, 0.02 mile to transit selected to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 and Improve Pedestrian Network Onsite and Connecting Offsite Energy Mitigation - Exceed Title 24 by 7% selected to account for the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards Water Mitigation - Install low flow fixtures and water-efficient irrigation selected to account for Title 24 Part 11 requirements Waste Mitigation - 50% reduction in waste selected to account for AB 341. Fleet Mix - Apartment vehicle mix adjusted so that trucks equal 2% of all trips. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 50.00 10.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 2 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final tblFireplaces NumberGas 267.75 4.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 15.75 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.59 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.22 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7840e-003 2.0000e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.9410e-003 5.0000e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 3 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix MH 9.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.7750e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.9800e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5240e-003 0.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 10.00 22.50 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,500.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 255,600.00 239,072.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 315,000.00 378,112.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,410.00 3,413.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.75 1.75 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.29 3.42 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.014 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 756.4 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 15.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 15.75 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 4 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 3.4831 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 7.8222 1.5801 9.3826 3.6019 1.4685 4.6882 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 2022 52.6854 22.7881 26.8948 0.0758 4.1327 0.8451 4.9778 1.1065 0.7949 1.9014 0.0000 7,594.785 8 7,594.785 8 0.8315 0.0000 7,615.572 0 Maximum 52.6854 40.3978 27.8056 0.0772 7.8222 1.5801 9.3826 3.6019 1.4685 4.6882 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 2.1315 10.9603 28.9126 0.0772 4.1327 0.1505 4.2831 1.7088 0.1480 1.7764 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 2022 52.5105 9.8660 28.1906 0.0758 4.1327 0.1379 4.2705 1.1065 0.1355 1.2420 0.0000 7,594.785 8 7,594.785 8 0.8315 0.0000 7,615.572 0 Maximum 52.5105 10.9603 28.9126 0.0772 4.1327 0.1505 4.2831 1.7088 0.1480 1.7764 0.0000 7,733.673 2 7,733.673 2 1.3616 0.0000 7,754.856 8 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.72 67.04 -4.39 0.00 30.86 88.11 40.44 40.21 87.48 54.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 5 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Mobile 2.7700 5.7530 37.4121 0.1394 15.1878 0.0980 15.2857 4.0346 0.0905 4.1251 14,001.65 91 14,001.65 91 0.4252 14,012.28 90 Total 11.9875 7.0303 63.8879 0.1470 15.1878 0.3211 15.5088 4.0346 0.3136 4.3481 0.0000 15,295.74 14 15,295.74 14 0.4945 0.0229 15,314.91 67 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Energy 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mobile 2.2556 4.0080 22.6313 0.0749 7.9267 0.0566 7.9833 2.1057 0.0523 2.1580 7,523.060 2 7,523.060 2 0.2483 7,529.267 5 Total 11.4692 5.2523 49.0930 0.0823 7.9267 0.2770 8.2038 2.1057 0.2727 2.3784 0.0000 8,775.055 6 8,775.055 6 0.3168 0.0221 8,789.558 2 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 6 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/22/2021 11/18/2021 5 20 2 Grading Grading 11/19/2021 12/16/2021 5 20 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/17/2021 11/3/2022 5 230 4 Paving Paving 11/4/2022 12/1/2022 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/2/2022 12/29/2022 5 20 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.32 25.29 23.16 44.02 47.81 13.71 47.10 47.81 13.03 45.30 0.00 42.63 42.63 35.94 3.37 42.61 Residential Indoor: 765,677; Residential Outdoor: 255,226; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,120; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,707; Striped Parking Area: 14,344 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 22.5 Acres of Paving: 1.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 7 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 6.00 650.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 438.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 328.00 73.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 66.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 8 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0306 0.0000 7.0306 1.0645 0.0000 1.0645 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 7.0306 1.5513 8.5820 1.0645 1.4411 2.5056 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 9 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2398 8.3595 2.3827 0.0241 0.5658 0.0264 0.5923 0.1549 0.0253 0.1802 2,697.013 6 2,697.013 6 0.2903 2,704.270 5 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.3179 8.9571 2.9706 0.0271 0.7718 0.0287 0.8006 0.2104 0.0274 0.2378 3,003.701 8 3,003.701 8 0.3067 3,011.370 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.1638 0.0000 3.1638 0.4790 0.0000 0.4790 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0616 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Total 0.4623 2.0032 23.2798 0.0388 3.1638 0.0616 3.2254 0.4790 0.0616 0.5407 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944 9 1.0549 3,774.317 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 10 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2398 8.3595 2.3827 0.0241 0.5658 0.0264 0.5923 0.1549 0.0253 0.1802 2,697.013 6 2,697.013 6 0.2903 2,704.270 5 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.3179 8.9571 2.9706 0.0271 0.7718 0.0287 0.8006 0.2104 0.0274 0.2378 3,003.701 8 3,003.701 8 0.3067 3,011.370 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.2349 0.0000 7.2349 3.4421 0.0000 3.4421 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 1.1599 1.1599 1.0671 1.0671 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 2.2903 24.7367 15.8575 0.0296 7.2349 1.1599 8.3949 3.4421 1.0671 4.5092 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 11 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1616 5.6331 1.6056 0.0163 0.3813 0.0178 0.3991 0.1044 0.0170 0.1214 1,817.372 2 1,817.372 2 0.1956 1,822.262 3 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.2397 6.2306 2.1935 0.0192 0.5873 0.0201 0.6074 0.1599 0.0192 0.1791 2,124.060 5 2,124.060 5 0.2121 2,129.362 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 3.2557 0.0000 3.2557 1.5489 0.0000 1.5489 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.3632 1.5737 17.7527 0.0296 0.0484 0.0484 0.0484 0.0484 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Total 0.3632 1.5737 17.7527 0.0296 3.2557 0.0484 3.3041 1.5489 0.0484 1.5973 0.0000 2,871.928 5 2,871.928 5 0.9288 2,895.149 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 12 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1616 5.6331 1.6056 0.0163 0.3813 0.0178 0.3991 0.1044 0.0170 0.1214 1,817.372 2 1,817.372 2 0.1956 1,822.262 3 Vendor 0.0168 0.5616 0.1675 1.4400e- 003 0.0383 1.2100e- 003 0.0396 0.0110 1.1600e- 003 0.0122 157.3134 157.3134 0.0133 157.6450 Worker 0.0613 0.0360 0.4204 1.5000e- 003 0.1677 1.0900e- 003 0.1688 0.0445 1.0000e- 003 0.0455 149.3748 149.3748 3.2000e- 003 149.4548 Total 0.2397 6.2306 2.1935 0.0192 0.5873 0.0201 0.6074 0.1599 0.0192 0.1791 2,124.060 5 2,124.060 5 0.2121 2,129.362 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 13 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2045 6.8323 2.0376 0.0176 0.4664 0.0148 0.4812 0.1342 0.0141 0.1483 1,913.979 7 1,913.979 7 0.1614 1,918.014 3 Worker 1.3404 0.7871 9.1928 0.0328 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,266.329 6 3,266.329 6 0.0699 3,268.078 2 Total 1.5448 7.6194 11.2304 0.0503 4.1327 0.0385 4.1712 1.1065 0.0360 1.1425 5,180.309 3 5,180.309 3 0.2313 5,186.092 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.5867 2.7396 17.6822 0.0269 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Total 0.5867 2.7396 17.6822 0.0269 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.1120 0.0000 2,553.363 9 2,553.363 9 0.6160 2,568.764 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 14 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2045 6.8323 2.0376 0.0176 0.4664 0.0148 0.4812 0.1342 0.0141 0.1483 1,913.979 7 1,913.979 7 0.1614 1,918.014 3 Worker 1.3404 0.7871 9.1928 0.0328 3.6663 0.0237 3.6900 0.9723 0.0219 0.9942 3,266.329 6 3,266.329 6 0.0699 3,268.078 2 Total 1.5448 7.6194 11.2304 0.0503 4.1327 0.0385 4.1712 1.1065 0.0360 1.1425 5,180.309 3 5,180.309 3 0.2313 5,186.092 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 15 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1923 6.4594 1.9647 0.0174 0.4664 0.0129 0.4792 0.1342 0.0123 0.1465 1,895.001 8 1,895.001 8 0.1560 1,898.902 6 Worker 1.2700 0.7130 8.5667 0.0315 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,145.450 4 3,145.450 4 0.0635 3,147.037 2 Total 1.4623 7.1724 10.5314 0.0489 4.1327 0.0361 4.1688 1.1065 0.0337 1.1402 5,040.452 2 5,040.452 2 0.2195 5,045.939 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.5608 2.6936 17.6592 0.0269 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 0.5608 2.6936 17.6592 0.0269 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.1018 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 16 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1923 6.4594 1.9647 0.0174 0.4664 0.0129 0.4792 0.1342 0.0123 0.1465 1,895.001 8 1,895.001 8 0.1560 1,898.902 6 Worker 1.2700 0.7130 8.5667 0.0315 3.6663 0.0233 3.6895 0.9723 0.0214 0.9937 3,145.450 4 3,145.450 4 0.0635 3,147.037 2 Total 1.4623 7.1724 10.5314 0.0489 4.1327 0.0361 4.1688 1.1065 0.0337 1.1402 5,040.452 2 5,040.452 2 0.2195 5,045.939 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 17 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Total 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.2805 1.2154 17.2957 0.0228 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0374 0.0000 2,207.660 3 2,207.660 3 0.7140 2,225.510 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 18 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Total 0.0581 0.0326 0.3918 1.4400e- 003 0.1677 1.0600e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.8000e- 004 0.0455 143.8468 143.8468 2.9000e- 003 143.9194 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 52.2253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 52.4298 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 19 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Total 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 52.2253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 52.2550 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 3.9600e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 20 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Total 0.2556 0.1435 1.7238 6.3400e- 003 0.7377 4.6800e- 003 0.7424 0.1957 4.3100e- 003 0.2000 632.9260 632.9260 0.0128 633.2453 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 21 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.2556 4.0080 22.6313 0.0749 7.9267 0.0566 7.9833 2.1057 0.0523 2.1580 7,523.060 2 7,523.060 2 0.2483 7,529.267 5 Unmitigated 2.7700 5.7530 37.4121 0.1394 15.1878 0.0980 15.2857 4.0346 0.0905 4.1251 14,001.65 91 14,001.65 91 0.4252 14,012.28 90 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 1,713.60 2,012.85 1845.90 6,066,299 3,166,096 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 128.73 170.40 86.07 278,112 145,151 Total 1,842.33 2,183.25 1,931.97 6,344,411 3,311,247 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 22 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.593000 0.045000 0.220000 0.116000 0.005000 0.002000 0.007000 0.007000 0.000000 0.000000 0.005000 0.000000 0.000000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Regional Shopping Center 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 23 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9862.05 0.1064 0.9089 0.3868 5.8000e- 003 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 0.0735 1,160.241 7 1,160.241 7 0.0222 0.0213 1,167.136 4 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 18.7014 2.0000e- 004 1.8300e- 003 1.5400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 2.2002 2.2002 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.2132 Total 0.1066 0.9107 0.3883 5.8100e- 003 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 0.0736 1,162.441 9 1,162.441 9 0.0223 0.0213 1,169.349 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Mid Rise 9.50494 0.1025 0.8760 0.3727 5.5900e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 1,118.2280 1,118.2280 0.0214 0.0205 1,124.873 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.0180795 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 1.4900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 2.1270 2.1270 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.1397 Total 0.1027 0.8777 0.3742 5.6000e- 003 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 0.0710 1,120.355 0 1,120.355 0 0.0215 0.0205 1,127.012 7 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 24 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 25 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 26 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.6751 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 7.6389 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 7.7600e- 003 0.0664 0.0282 4.2000e- 004 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 0.0000 84.7059 84.7059 1.6200e- 003 1.5500e- 003 85.2093 Landscaping 0.7892 0.3002 26.0593 1.3800e- 003 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 0.1441 46.9346 46.9346 0.0454 48.0687 Total 9.1109 0.3666 26.0875 1.8000e- 003 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.1495 0.0000 131.6405 131.6405 0.0470 1.5500e- 003 133.2780 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 27 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter Institute Recycling and Composting Services 11.0 Vegetation 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 4:10 PMPage 28 of 28 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - With Mitigation - Orange County, Winter 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix D APPENDIX D AERMOD Model Prior to Mitigation DPM Concentration Printouts ** **************************************** ** ** AERMOD Input Produced by: ** AERMOD View Ver. 9.8.1 ** Lakes Environmental Software Inc. ** Date: 10/31/2019 ** File: C:\Vista Env\2019\19006 Anaheim\AERMOD\Constr\Constr.ADI ** **************************************** ** ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Control Pathway **************************************** ** ** CO STARTING TITLEONE 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments TITLETWO Unmitigated Construction PM10 Exhaust Emissions MODELOPT DFAULT CONC AVERTIME 24 ANNUAL URBANOPT 3010759 Orange_County POLLUTID PM_10 RUNORNOT RUN ERRORFIL Constr.err CO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Source Pathway **************************************** ** ** SO STARTING ** Source Location ** ** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION OFFROAD AREAPOLY 413126.288 3743969.693 35.000 ** DESCRSRC Off-Road Equipment PM10 Exhaust ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks Onsite ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 3.66 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 4.66E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 3 ** 413277.634, 3743862.616, 35.23, 0.00, 1.70 ** 413231.551, 3743862.616, 35.06, 0.00, 1.70 ** 413224.848, 3743977.404, 35.72, 0.00, 1.70 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000094 VOLUME 413275.805 3743862.616 35.23 LOCATION L0000095 VOLUME 413272.148 3743862.616 35.19 LOCATION L0000096 VOLUME 413268.490 3743862.616 35.16 LOCATION L0000097 VOLUME 413264.832 3743862.616 35.12 LOCATION L0000098 VOLUME 413261.175 3743862.616 35.09 LOCATION L0000099 VOLUME 413257.517 3743862.616 35.05 LOCATION L0000100 VOLUME 413253.860 3743862.616 35.02 LOCATION L0000101 VOLUME 413250.202 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000102 VOLUME 413246.544 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000103 VOLUME 413242.887 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000104 VOLUME 413239.229 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000105 VOLUME 413235.572 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000106 VOLUME 413231.914 3743862.616 35.00 LOCATION L0000107 VOLUME 413231.359 3743865.906 35.00 LOCATION L0000108 VOLUME 413231.146 3743869.557 35.00 LOCATION L0000109 VOLUME 413230.933 3743873.209 35.00 LOCATION L0000110 VOLUME 413230.720 3743876.860 35.00 LOCATION L0000111 VOLUME 413230.506 3743880.511 35.00 LOCATION L0000112 VOLUME 413230.293 3743884.163 35.00 LOCATION L0000113 VOLUME 413230.080 3743887.814 35.01 LOCATION L0000114 VOLUME 413229.867 3743891.466 35.03 LOCATION L0000115 VOLUME 413229.654 3743895.117 35.06 LOCATION L0000116 VOLUME 413229.440 3743898.768 35.09 LOCATION L0000117 VOLUME 413229.227 3743902.420 35.12 LOCATION L0000118 VOLUME 413229.014 3743906.071 35.14 LOCATION L0000119 VOLUME 413228.801 3743909.722 35.17 LOCATION L0000120 VOLUME 413228.587 3743913.374 35.20 LOCATION L0000121 VOLUME 413228.374 3743917.025 35.22 LOCATION L0000122 VOLUME 413228.161 3743920.677 35.25 LOCATION L0000123 VOLUME 413227.948 3743924.328 35.28 LOCATION L0000124 VOLUME 413227.735 3743927.979 35.30 LOCATION L0000125 VOLUME 413227.521 3743931.631 35.33 LOCATION L0000126 VOLUME 413227.308 3743935.282 35.35 LOCATION L0000127 VOLUME 413227.095 3743938.934 35.38 LOCATION L0000128 VOLUME 413226.882 3743942.585 35.40 LOCATION L0000129 VOLUME 413226.668 3743946.236 35.42 LOCATION L0000130 VOLUME 413226.455 3743949.888 35.45 LOCATION L0000131 VOLUME 413226.242 3743953.539 35.47 LOCATION L0000132 VOLUME 413226.029 3743957.190 35.50 LOCATION L0000133 VOLUME 413225.816 3743960.842 35.52 LOCATION L0000134 VOLUME 413225.602 3743964.493 35.54 LOCATION L0000135 VOLUME 413225.389 3743968.145 35.57 LOCATION L0000136 VOLUME 413225.176 3743971.796 35.59 LOCATION L0000137 VOLUME 413224.963 3743975.447 35.61 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks on Lincoln Avenue ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 15.24 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 6.9E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 6 ** 413222.022, 3743991.504, 35.66, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413392.163, 3743993.109, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413461.985, 3743982.676, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413580.763, 3743955.389, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413615.273, 3743949.771, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413653.795, 3743948.166, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000138 VOLUME 413229.642 3743991.576 35.74 LOCATION L0000139 VOLUME 413244.881 3743991.719 35.91 LOCATION L0000140 VOLUME 413260.120 3743991.863 36.01 LOCATION L0000141 VOLUME 413275.360 3743992.007 36.04 LOCATION L0000142 VOLUME 413290.599 3743992.151 36.07 LOCATION L0000143 VOLUME 413305.838 3743992.295 36.10 LOCATION L0000144 VOLUME 413321.078 3743992.438 36.13 LOCATION L0000145 VOLUME 413336.317 3743992.582 36.15 LOCATION L0000146 VOLUME 413351.556 3743992.726 36.15 LOCATION L0000147 VOLUME 413366.796 3743992.870 36.16 LOCATION L0000148 VOLUME 413382.035 3743993.013 36.16 LOCATION L0000149 VOLUME 413397.218 3743992.354 36.16 LOCATION L0000150 VOLUME 413412.291 3743990.101 36.13 LOCATION L0000151 VOLUME 413427.364 3743987.849 36.11 LOCATION L0000152 VOLUME 413442.436 3743985.597 36.09 LOCATION L0000153 VOLUME 413457.509 3743983.345 36.06 LOCATION L0000154 VOLUME 413472.427 3743980.277 36.03 LOCATION L0000155 VOLUME 413487.280 3743976.865 36.00 LOCATION L0000156 VOLUME 413502.133 3743973.453 36.00 LOCATION L0000157 VOLUME 413516.987 3743970.040 36.00 LOCATION L0000158 VOLUME 413531.840 3743966.628 36.00 LOCATION L0000159 VOLUME 413546.693 3743963.216 36.00 LOCATION L0000160 VOLUME 413561.546 3743959.804 36.00 LOCATION L0000161 VOLUME 413576.399 3743956.392 36.00 LOCATION L0000162 VOLUME 413591.385 3743953.660 36.00 LOCATION L0000163 VOLUME 413606.427 3743951.211 36.00 LOCATION L0000164 VOLUME 413621.546 3743949.510 36.00 LOCATION L0000165 VOLUME 413636.772 3743948.875 36.00 LOCATION L0000166 VOLUME 413651.999 3743948.241 36.00 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks on Loara St ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 6.10 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 1.91E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 2 ** 413283.995, 3743859.113, 35.37, 0.00, 2.84 ** 413282.570, 3743980.543, 36.00, 0.00, 2.84 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000167 VOLUME 413283.959 3743862.160 35.31 LOCATION L0000168 VOLUME 413283.887 3743868.256 35.33 LOCATION L0000169 VOLUME 413283.816 3743874.351 35.36 LOCATION L0000170 VOLUME 413283.744 3743880.447 35.38 LOCATION L0000171 VOLUME 413283.673 3743886.543 35.41 LOCATION L0000172 VOLUME 413283.601 3743892.638 35.45 LOCATION L0000173 VOLUME 413283.530 3743898.734 35.48 LOCATION L0000174 VOLUME 413283.458 3743904.829 35.52 LOCATION L0000175 VOLUME 413283.387 3743910.925 35.56 LOCATION L0000176 VOLUME 413283.315 3743917.021 35.60 LOCATION L0000177 VOLUME 413283.244 3743923.116 35.64 LOCATION L0000178 VOLUME 413283.172 3743929.212 35.68 LOCATION L0000179 VOLUME 413283.101 3743935.307 35.71 LOCATION L0000180 VOLUME 413283.029 3743941.403 35.75 LOCATION L0000181 VOLUME 413282.958 3743947.498 35.79 LOCATION L0000182 VOLUME 413282.886 3743953.594 35.83 LOCATION L0000183 VOLUME 413282.815 3743959.690 35.87 LOCATION L0000184 VOLUME 413282.743 3743965.785 35.91 LOCATION L0000185 VOLUME 413282.672 3743971.881 35.95 LOCATION L0000186 VOLUME 413282.600 3743977.976 35.99 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA LOCATION IDLE POINT 413220.360 3743917.710 35.190 ** DESCRSRC Construction Truck Idling ** Source Parameters ** SRCPARAM OFFROAD 4.26E-07 3.962 7 11.887 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413126.288 3743969.693 413126.670 3743900.928 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413186.267 3743900.163 413185.503 3743788.610 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413270.696 3743787.464 413272.224 3743969.693 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413265.730 3743975.042 ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON SRCPARAM L0000094 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000095 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000096 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000097 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000098 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000099 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000100 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000101 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000102 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000103 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000104 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000105 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000106 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000107 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000108 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000109 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000110 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000111 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000112 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000113 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000114 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000115 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000116 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000117 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000118 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000119 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000120 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000121 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000122 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000123 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000124 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000125 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000126 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000127 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000128 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000129 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000130 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000131 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000132 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000133 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000134 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000135 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000136 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000137 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN SRCPARAM L0000138 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000139 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000140 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000141 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000142 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000143 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000144 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000145 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000146 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000147 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000148 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000149 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000150 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000151 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000152 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000153 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000154 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000155 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000156 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000157 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000158 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000159 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000160 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000161 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000162 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000163 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000164 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000165 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000166 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA SRCPARAM L0000167 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000168 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000169 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000170 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000171 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000172 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000173 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000174 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000175 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000176 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000177 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000178 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000179 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000180 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000181 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000182 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000183 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000184 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000185 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000186 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- SRCPARAM IDLE 2.22E-06 3.658 366.000 50.00000 0.100 URBANSRC ALL ** Variable Emissions Type: "By Hour-of-Day (HROFDY)" ** Variable Emission Scenario: "Scenario 2" SRCGROUP ALL SO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Receptor Pathway **************************************** ** ** RE STARTING INCLUDED Constr.rou RE FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway **************************************** ** ** ME STARTING SURFFILE ..\FullertonAirportADJU\KFUL_V9_ADJU\KFUL_v9.SFC PROFFILE ..\FullertonAirportADJU\KFUL_V9_ADJU\KFUL_v9.PFL SURFDATA 3166 2012 Fullerton_Airport UAIRDATA 3190 2012 PROFBASE 29.0 METERS ME FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Output Pathway **************************************** ** ** OU STARTING RECTABLE ALLAVE 1ST RECTABLE 24 1ST ** Auto-Generated Plotfiles PLOTFILE 24 ALL 1ST Constr.AD\24H1GALL.PLT 31 PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL Constr.AD\AN00GALL.PLT 32 SUMMFILE Constr.sum OU FINISHED ** **************************************** ** Project Parameters **************************************** ** PROJCTN CoordinateSystemUTM ** DESCPTN UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator ** DATUM World Geodetic System 1984 ** DTMRGN Global Definition ** UNITS m ** ZONE 11 ** ZONEINX 0 ** * A E R M O D ( 1 9 1 9 1 ) : 1 6 0 0 W L i n c o l n A v e n u e A p a r t m e n t s 1 0 / 3 1 / 1 9 * A E R M E T ( 1 6 2 1 6 ) : 2 1 : 4 8 : 0 5 * M O D E L I N G O P T I O N S U S E D : R e g D F A U L T C O N C E L E V U R B A N A D J _ U * * P L O T F I L E O F A N N U A L V A L U E S A V E R A G E D A C R O S S 5 Y E A R S F O R S O U R C E G R O U P : A L L * F O R A T O T A L O F 1 9 8 R E C E P T O R S . * F O R M A T : ( 3 ( 1 X , F 1 3 . 5 ) , 3 ( 1 X , F 8 . 2 ) , 2 X , A 6 , 2 X , A 8 , 2 X , I 8 . 8 , 2 X , A 8 ) * X Y A V E R A G E C O N C Z E L E V Z H I L L Z F L A G A V E G R P N U M Y R S N E T I D * _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 1 3 1 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 3 7 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 7 5 7 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 1 7 2 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 6 2 5 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 8 1 2 9 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 7 8 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 5 0 4 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 2 6 6 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 7 0 5 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 8 6 0 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 6 7 3 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 4 8 6 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 2 9 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 9 6 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 8 8 2 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 6 5 0 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 3 9 6 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 1 1 8 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 8 1 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 3 0 8 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 0 9 7 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 9 1 4 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 7 5 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 6 0 1 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 4 6 0 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 3 2 4 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 1 9 0 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 0 5 5 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 9 1 8 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 7 7 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 6 3 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 4 8 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 3 1 0 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 4 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 0 8 3 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 2 2 8 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 1 4 5 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 0 6 2 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 7 9 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 9 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 1 4 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 3 1 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 4 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 6 2 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 7 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 9 1 1 3 4 . 9 8 3 4 . 9 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 4 3 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 8 4 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 8 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 2 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 6 8 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 1 0 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 5 1 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 9 0 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 2 9 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 0 6 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 4 0 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 7 4 0 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 8 1 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 8 4 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 1 6 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 8 9 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 6 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 4 9 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 3 6 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 2 8 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 9 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 4 8 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 0 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 5 9 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 1 1 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 6 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 1 2 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 6 1 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 0 9 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 8 5 7 0 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 9 4 1 3 4 . 8 0 3 4 . 8 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 3 1 0 3 4 . 7 8 3 4 . 7 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 6 9 3 3 4 . 7 5 3 4 . 7 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 0 9 2 3 4 . 7 3 3 4 . 7 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 5 0 8 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 9 4 2 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 3 9 5 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 8 6 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 4 4 3 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 8 6 0 3 4 . 5 8 3 4 . 5 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 2 8 6 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 7 2 1 3 4 . 4 5 3 4 . 4 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 1 6 7 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 6 2 7 3 4 . 3 2 3 4 . 3 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 1 0 0 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 5 8 9 3 4 . 1 9 3 4 . 1 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 0 9 5 3 4 . 1 3 3 4 . 1 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 4 4 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 9 7 2 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 8 5 2 1 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 0 9 7 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 7 0 3 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 3 4 1 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 5 0 1 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 8 6 7 6 3 4 . 5 9 3 4 . 5 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 8 6 7 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 0 8 0 3 4 . 4 6 3 4 . 4 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 3 1 6 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 5 7 9 3 4 . 3 3 3 4 . 3 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 8 7 0 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 1 9 0 3 4 . 2 0 3 4 . 2 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 8 2 9 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 6 1 7 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 5 3 9 3 4 . 4 2 3 4 . 4 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 1 9 6 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 8 4 5 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 8 8 6 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 8 3 9 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 1 5 3 3 4 . 4 1 3 4 . 4 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 8 7 7 3 4 . 3 4 3 4 . 3 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 9 2 7 3 4 . 2 8 3 4 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 3 8 3 4 . 2 1 3 4 . 2 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 8 7 6 4 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 7 4 6 5 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 6 3 1 4 3 4 . 0 2 3 4 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 2 8 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 3 7 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 5 4 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 7 9 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 3 4 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 5 5 1 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 5 6 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 7 1 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 9 4 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 2 4 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 4 2 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 3 9 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 2 8 5 3 4 . 0 6 3 4 . 0 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 2 1 3 3 4 . 1 1 3 4 . 1 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 1 3 0 3 4 . 1 7 3 4 . 1 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 5 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 9 5 0 3 4 . 1 4 3 4 . 1 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 4 6 1 3 4 . 1 0 3 4 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 9 7 8 3 4 . 0 9 3 4 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 3 1 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 1 1 6 3 4 . 0 7 3 4 . 0 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 3 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 8 7 2 9 3 4 . 0 5 3 4 . 0 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 2 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 8 3 7 0 3 4 . 0 4 3 4 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 4 1 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 5 0 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 5 9 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 6 7 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 7 5 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 8 3 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 9 0 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 9 6 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 0 2 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 0 7 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 1 1 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 1 5 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 1 7 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 8 9 9 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 0 6 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 1 3 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 1 9 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 2 5 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 3 1 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 3 7 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 4 2 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 4 6 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 0 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 6 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 8 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 9 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 5 9 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 4 4 2 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 9 8 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 5 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 1 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 7 9 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 8 8 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 3 3 5 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 8 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 3 4 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 8 5 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 3 9 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 9 5 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 5 2 4 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 5 1 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 8 3 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 2 1 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 7 8 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 4 0 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 1 0 3 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 6 6 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 0 3 0 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 9 5 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 9 6 1 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ** C O N C U N I T u g / m ^ 3 ** D E P U N I T g / m ^ 2 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix E APPENDIX E AERMOD Model Mitigated DPM Concentration Printouts ** **************************************** ** ** AERMOD Input Produced by: ** AERMOD View Ver. 9.8.1 ** Lakes Environmental Software Inc. ** Date: 11/1/2019 ** File: C:\Vista Env\2019\19006 Anaheim\AERMOD\ConstrMit\ConstrMit.ADI ** **************************************** ** ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Control Pathway **************************************** ** ** CO STARTING TITLEONE 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments - Mitigated TITLETWO Construction PM10 Exhaust Emissions with Tier 4 Final Equipment MODELOPT DFAULT CONC AVERTIME 1 ANNUAL URBANOPT 3010759 Orange_County POLLUTID PM_10 RUNORNOT RUN ERRORFIL ConstrMit.err CO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Source Pathway **************************************** ** ** SO STARTING ** Source Location ** ** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. ** LOCATION OFFROAD AREAPOLY 413126.288 3743969.693 35.000 ** DESCRSRC Off-Road Equipment PM10 Exhaust ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks Onsite ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 3.66 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 4.66E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 3 ** 413277.634, 3743862.616, 35.23, 0.00, 1.70 ** 413231.551, 3743862.616, 35.06, 0.00, 1.70 ** 413224.848, 3743977.404, 35.72, 0.00, 1.70 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000280 VOLUME 413275.805 3743862.616 35.22 LOCATION L0000281 VOLUME 413272.148 3743862.616 35.21 LOCATION L0000282 VOLUME 413268.490 3743862.616 35.20 LOCATION L0000283 VOLUME 413264.832 3743862.616 35.18 LOCATION L0000284 VOLUME 413261.175 3743862.616 35.17 LOCATION L0000285 VOLUME 413257.517 3743862.616 35.16 LOCATION L0000286 VOLUME 413253.860 3743862.616 35.14 LOCATION L0000287 VOLUME 413250.202 3743862.616 35.13 LOCATION L0000288 VOLUME 413246.544 3743862.616 35.12 LOCATION L0000289 VOLUME 413242.887 3743862.616 35.10 LOCATION L0000290 VOLUME 413239.229 3743862.616 35.09 LOCATION L0000291 VOLUME 413235.572 3743862.616 35.07 LOCATION L0000292 VOLUME 413231.914 3743862.616 35.06 LOCATION L0000293 VOLUME 413231.359 3743865.906 35.08 LOCATION L0000294 VOLUME 413231.146 3743869.557 35.10 LOCATION L0000295 VOLUME 413230.933 3743873.209 35.12 LOCATION L0000296 VOLUME 413230.720 3743876.860 35.14 LOCATION L0000297 VOLUME 413230.506 3743880.511 35.16 LOCATION L0000298 VOLUME 413230.293 3743884.163 35.18 LOCATION L0000299 VOLUME 413230.080 3743887.814 35.20 LOCATION L0000300 VOLUME 413229.867 3743891.466 35.23 LOCATION L0000301 VOLUME 413229.654 3743895.117 35.25 LOCATION L0000302 VOLUME 413229.440 3743898.768 35.27 LOCATION L0000303 VOLUME 413229.227 3743902.420 35.29 LOCATION L0000304 VOLUME 413229.014 3743906.071 35.31 LOCATION L0000305 VOLUME 413228.801 3743909.722 35.33 LOCATION L0000306 VOLUME 413228.587 3743913.374 35.35 LOCATION L0000307 VOLUME 413228.374 3743917.025 35.37 LOCATION L0000308 VOLUME 413228.161 3743920.677 35.39 LOCATION L0000309 VOLUME 413227.948 3743924.328 35.41 LOCATION L0000310 VOLUME 413227.735 3743927.979 35.44 LOCATION L0000311 VOLUME 413227.521 3743931.631 35.46 LOCATION L0000312 VOLUME 413227.308 3743935.282 35.48 LOCATION L0000313 VOLUME 413227.095 3743938.934 35.50 LOCATION L0000314 VOLUME 413226.882 3743942.585 35.52 LOCATION L0000315 VOLUME 413226.668 3743946.236 35.54 LOCATION L0000316 VOLUME 413226.455 3743949.888 35.56 LOCATION L0000317 VOLUME 413226.242 3743953.539 35.58 LOCATION L0000318 VOLUME 413226.029 3743957.190 35.60 LOCATION L0000319 VOLUME 413225.816 3743960.842 35.62 LOCATION L0000320 VOLUME 413225.602 3743964.493 35.65 LOCATION L0000321 VOLUME 413225.389 3743968.145 35.67 LOCATION L0000322 VOLUME 413225.176 3743971.796 35.69 LOCATION L0000323 VOLUME 413224.963 3743975.447 35.71 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks on Lincoln Avenue ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 15.24 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 6.9E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 6 ** 413222.022, 3743991.504, 35.66, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413392.163, 3743993.109, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413461.985, 3743982.676, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413580.763, 3743955.389, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413615.273, 3743949.771, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** 413653.795, 3743948.166, 36.00, 0.00, 7.09 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000324 VOLUME 413229.642 3743991.576 35.68 LOCATION L0000325 VOLUME 413244.881 3743991.719 35.71 LOCATION L0000326 VOLUME 413260.120 3743991.863 35.74 LOCATION L0000327 VOLUME 413275.360 3743992.007 35.77 LOCATION L0000328 VOLUME 413290.599 3743992.151 35.80 LOCATION L0000329 VOLUME 413305.838 3743992.295 35.83 LOCATION L0000330 VOLUME 413321.078 3743992.438 35.86 LOCATION L0000331 VOLUME 413336.317 3743992.582 35.89 LOCATION L0000332 VOLUME 413351.556 3743992.726 35.92 LOCATION L0000333 VOLUME 413366.796 3743992.870 35.95 LOCATION L0000334 VOLUME 413382.035 3743993.013 35.98 LOCATION L0000335 VOLUME 413397.218 3743992.354 36.00 LOCATION L0000336 VOLUME 413412.291 3743990.101 36.00 LOCATION L0000337 VOLUME 413427.364 3743987.849 36.00 LOCATION L0000338 VOLUME 413442.436 3743985.597 36.00 LOCATION L0000339 VOLUME 413457.509 3743983.345 36.00 LOCATION L0000340 VOLUME 413472.427 3743980.277 36.00 LOCATION L0000341 VOLUME 413487.280 3743976.865 36.00 LOCATION L0000342 VOLUME 413502.133 3743973.453 36.00 LOCATION L0000343 VOLUME 413516.987 3743970.040 36.00 LOCATION L0000344 VOLUME 413531.840 3743966.628 36.00 LOCATION L0000345 VOLUME 413546.693 3743963.216 36.00 LOCATION L0000346 VOLUME 413561.546 3743959.804 36.00 LOCATION L0000347 VOLUME 413576.399 3743956.392 36.00 LOCATION L0000348 VOLUME 413591.385 3743953.660 36.00 LOCATION L0000349 VOLUME 413606.427 3743951.211 36.00 LOCATION L0000350 VOLUME 413621.546 3743949.510 36.00 LOCATION L0000351 VOLUME 413636.772 3743948.875 36.00 LOCATION L0000352 VOLUME 413651.999 3743948.241 36.00 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA ** DESCRSRC Construction Trucks on Loara St ** PREFIX ** Length of Side = 6.10 ** Configuration = Adjacent ** Emission Rate = 1.91E-06 ** Vertical Dimension = 1.83 ** SZINIT = 0.85 ** Nodes = 2 ** 413283.995, 3743859.113, 35.37, 0.00, 2.84 ** 413282.570, 3743980.543, 36.00, 0.00, 2.84 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000353 VOLUME 413283.959 3743862.160 35.39 LOCATION L0000354 VOLUME 413283.887 3743868.256 35.42 LOCATION L0000355 VOLUME 413283.816 3743874.351 35.45 LOCATION L0000356 VOLUME 413283.744 3743880.447 35.48 LOCATION L0000357 VOLUME 413283.673 3743886.543 35.51 LOCATION L0000358 VOLUME 413283.601 3743892.638 35.54 LOCATION L0000359 VOLUME 413283.530 3743898.734 35.58 LOCATION L0000360 VOLUME 413283.458 3743904.829 35.61 LOCATION L0000361 VOLUME 413283.387 3743910.925 35.64 LOCATION L0000362 VOLUME 413283.315 3743917.021 35.67 LOCATION L0000363 VOLUME 413283.244 3743923.116 35.70 LOCATION L0000364 VOLUME 413283.172 3743929.212 35.73 LOCATION L0000365 VOLUME 413283.101 3743935.307 35.77 LOCATION L0000366 VOLUME 413283.029 3743941.403 35.80 LOCATION L0000367 VOLUME 413282.958 3743947.498 35.83 LOCATION L0000368 VOLUME 413282.886 3743953.594 35.86 LOCATION L0000369 VOLUME 413282.815 3743959.690 35.89 LOCATION L0000370 VOLUME 413282.743 3743965.785 35.92 LOCATION L0000371 VOLUME 413282.672 3743971.881 35.96 LOCATION L0000372 VOLUME 413282.600 3743977.976 35.99 ** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA LOCATION IDLE POINT 413220.360 3743917.710 35.190 ** DESCRSRC Construction Truck Idling ** Source Parameters ** SRCPARAM OFFROAD 5.78E-08 3.962 7 11.887 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413126.288 3743969.693 413126.670 3743900.928 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413186.267 3743900.163 413185.503 3743788.610 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413270.696 3743787.464 413272.224 3743969.693 AREAVERT OFFROAD 413265.730 3743975.042 ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDON SRCPARAM L0000280 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000281 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000282 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000283 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000284 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000285 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000286 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000287 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000288 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000289 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000290 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000291 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000292 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000293 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000294 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000295 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000296 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000297 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000298 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000299 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000300 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000301 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000302 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000303 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000304 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000305 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000306 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000307 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000308 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000309 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000310 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000311 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000312 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000313 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000314 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000315 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000316 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000317 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000318 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000319 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000320 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000321 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000322 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000323 0.0000001059 0.00 1.70 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLINCOLN SRCPARAM L0000324 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000325 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000326 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000327 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000328 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000329 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000330 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000331 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000332 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000333 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000334 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000335 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000336 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000337 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000338 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000339 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000340 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000341 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000342 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000343 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000344 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000345 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000346 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000347 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000348 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000349 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000350 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000351 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000352 0.0000002379 0.00 7.09 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = RDLOARA SRCPARAM L0000353 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000354 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000355 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000356 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000357 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000358 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000359 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000360 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000361 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000362 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000363 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000364 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000365 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000366 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000367 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000368 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000369 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000370 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000371 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 SRCPARAM L0000372 0.0000000955 0.00 2.84 0.85 ** --------------------------------------------------------------------- SRCPARAM IDLE 2.22E-06 3.658 366.000 50.00000 0.100 URBANSRC ALL ** Variable Emissions Type: "By Hour-of-Day (HROFDY)" ** Variable Emission Scenario: "Scenario 2" EMISFACT OFFROAD HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT OFFROAD HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT OFFROAD HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT OFFROAD HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000324 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000325 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000326 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000327 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000328 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000329 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000330 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000331 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000332 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000333 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000334 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000335 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000336 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000337 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000338 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000339 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000340 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000341 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000342 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000343 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000344 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000345 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000346 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000347 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000348 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000349 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000350 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000351 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000352 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000353 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000354 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000355 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000356 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000357 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000358 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000359 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000360 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000361 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000362 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000363 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000364 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000365 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000366 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000367 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000368 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000369 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000370 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000371 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000372 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000280 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000281 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000282 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000283 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000284 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000285 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000286 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000287 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000288 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000289 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000290 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000291 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000292 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000293 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000294 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000295 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000296 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000297 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000298 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000299 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000300 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000301 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000302 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000303 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000304 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000305 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000306 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000307 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000308 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000309 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000310 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000311 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000312 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000313 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000314 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000315 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000316 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000317 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000318 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000319 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000320 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000321 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000322 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 EMISFACT L0000323 HROFDY 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SRCGROUP ALL SO FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Receptor Pathway **************************************** ** ** RE STARTING INCLUDED ConstrMit.rou RE FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway **************************************** ** ** ME STARTING SURFFILE ..\FullertonAirportADJU\KFUL_V9_ADJU\KFUL_v9.SFC PROFFILE ..\FullertonAirportADJU\KFUL_V9_ADJU\KFUL_v9.PFL SURFDATA 3166 2012 Fullerton_Airport UAIRDATA 3190 2012 PROFBASE 29.0 METERS ME FINISHED ** **************************************** ** AERMOD Output Pathway **************************************** ** ** OU STARTING RECTABLE ALLAVE 1ST RECTABLE 1 1ST ** Auto-Generated Plotfiles PLOTFILE 1 ALL 1ST CONSTRMIT.AD\01H1GALL.PLT 31 PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL CONSTRMIT.AD\AN00GALL.PLT 32 SUMMFILE ConstrMit.sum OU FINISHED ** **************************************** ** Project Parameters **************************************** ** PROJCTN CoordinateSystemUTM ** DESCPTN UTM: Universal Transverse Mercator ** DATUM World Geodetic System 1984 ** DTMRGN Global Definition ** UNITS m ** ZONE 11 ** ZONEINX 0 ** * A E R M O D ( 1 9 1 9 1 ) : 1 6 0 0 W L i n c o l n A v e n u e A p a r t m e n t s - M i t i g a t e d 1 1 / 0 1 / 1 9 * A E R M E T ( 1 6 2 1 6 ) : 1 1 : 4 3 : 4 9 * M O D E L I N G O P T I O N S U S E D : R e g D F A U L T C O N C E L E V U R B A N A D J _ U * * P L O T F I L E O F A N N U A L V A L U E S A V E R A G E D A C R O S S 5 Y E A R S F O R S O U R C E G R O U P : A L L * F O R A T O T A L O F 1 9 8 R E C E P T O R S . * F O R M A T : ( 3 ( 1 X , F 1 3 . 5 ) , 3 ( 1 X , F 8 . 2 ) , 2 X , A 6 , 2 X , A 8 , 2 X , I 8 . 8 , 2 X , A 8 ) * X Y A V E R A G E C O N C Z E L E V Z H I L L Z F L A G A V E G R P N U M Y R S N E T I D * _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 1 3 1 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 9 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 3 0 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 3 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 7 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 1 2 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 3 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 9 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 5 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 9 0 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 6 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 8 1 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 6 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 1 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 9 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 6 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 3 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 0 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 8 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 3 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 8 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 6 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 8 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 6 2 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 4 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 7 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 5 3 4 . 9 8 3 4 . 9 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 8 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 5 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 4 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 2 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 0 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 5 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 2 9 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 3 4 . 8 0 3 4 . 8 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 3 3 4 . 7 8 3 4 . 7 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 7 3 4 . 7 5 3 4 . 7 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 1 3 4 . 7 3 3 4 . 7 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 5 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 3 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 8 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 2 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 4 3 4 . 5 8 3 4 . 5 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 7 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 0 3 4 . 4 5 3 4 . 4 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 3 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 7 3 4 . 3 2 3 4 . 3 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 1 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 9 5 3 4 . 1 9 3 4 . 1 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 9 3 4 . 1 3 3 4 . 1 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 4 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 5 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 5 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 1 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 6 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 8 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 5 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 3 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 2 3 4 . 5 9 3 4 . 5 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 2 3 4 . 4 6 3 4 . 4 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 3 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 4 3 4 . 3 3 3 4 . 3 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 6 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 8 3 4 . 2 0 3 4 . 2 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 7 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 4 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 0 7 3 4 . 4 2 3 4 . 4 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 1 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 2 4 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 3 4 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 9 4 3 4 . 4 1 3 4 . 4 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 6 0 3 4 . 3 4 3 4 . 3 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 3 3 3 4 . 2 8 3 4 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 0 3 4 . 2 1 3 4 . 2 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 0 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 3 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 8 3 4 . 0 2 3 4 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 1 3 4 . 0 6 3 4 . 0 6 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 3 3 4 . 1 1 3 4 . 1 1 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 4 3 4 . 1 7 3 4 . 1 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 6 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 8 3 4 . 1 4 3 4 . 1 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 0 1 3 4 . 1 0 3 4 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 9 4 3 4 . 0 9 3 4 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 9 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 4 3 4 . 0 7 3 4 . 0 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 3 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 9 3 4 . 0 5 3 4 . 0 5 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 2 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 5 3 4 . 0 4 3 4 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 9 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 9 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 6 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 9 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 8 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 7 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 6 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 7 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 5 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 4 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 3 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 1 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 A N N U A L A L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 ** C O N C U N I T u g / m ^ 3 ** D E P U N I T g / m ^ 2 * A E R M O D ( 1 9 1 9 1 ) : 1 6 0 0 W L i n c o l n A v e n u e A p a r t m e n t s - M i t i g a t e d 1 1 / 0 1 / 1 9 * A E R M E T ( 1 6 2 1 6 ) : C o n s t r u c t i o n P M 1 0 E x h a u s t E m i s s i o n s w i t h T i e r 4 F i n a l E q u i p m e n t 1 1 : 4 3 : 4 9 * M O D E L I N G O P T I O N S U S E D : R e g D F A U L T C O N C E L E V U R B A N A D J _ U * * P L O T F I L E O F H I G H 1 S T H I G H 1 - H R V A L U E S F O R S O U R C E G R O U P : A L L * F O R A T O T A L O F 1 9 8 R E C E P T O R S . * F O R M A T : ( 3 ( 1 X , F 1 3 . 5 ) , 3 ( 1 X , F 8 . 2 ) , 3 X , A 5 , 2 X , A 8 , 2 X , A 5 , 5 X , A 8 , 2 X , I 8 ) * X Y A V E R A G E C O N C Z E L E V Z H I L L Z F L A G A V E G R P R A N K N E T I D D A T E ( C O N C ) * _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 1 3 1 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 7 7 3 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 8 3 0 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 0 4 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 0 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 1 4 2 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 2 4 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 5 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 1 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 0 2 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 0 2 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 1 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 2 1 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 3 3 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 4 1 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 3 5 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 9 0 6 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 8 3 4 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 6 9 9 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 4 8 7 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 7 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 2 9 6 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 0 9 8 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 9 4 1 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 8 1 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 7 2 0 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 6 4 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 5 7 9 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 5 2 4 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 4 7 2 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 4 1 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 3 5 1 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 2 7 3 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 1 8 0 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 0 7 1 2 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 8 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 0 9 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 6 3 7 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 9 3 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 6 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 3 5 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 0 1 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 4 6 4 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 4 2 2 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 7 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 2 4 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 2 6 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 2 0 4 7 3 4 . 9 8 3 4 . 9 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 1 4 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 1 0 1 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 0 5 1 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 5 1 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 0 9 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 0 7 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 9 8 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 8 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 6 5 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 4 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 3 2 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 9 7 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 5 6 2 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 2 9 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 6 1 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 8 4 1 2 9 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 2 8 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 0 6 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 8 8 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 7 3 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 6 4 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 5 8 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 5 7 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 3 7 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 1 1 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 7 8 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 9 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 2 6 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 2 5 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 2 0 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 0 9 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 8 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 9 2 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 7 0 8 3 4 . 9 9 3 4 . 9 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 2 9 9 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 9 9 2 3 4 . 8 0 3 4 . 8 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 0 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 5 4 1 3 4 . 7 8 3 4 . 7 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 0 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 1 0 1 3 4 . 7 5 3 4 . 7 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 1 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 6 6 6 3 4 . 7 3 3 4 . 7 3 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 2 3 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 2 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 8 2 1 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 4 1 2 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 0 0 8 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 6 6 9 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 0 9 5 3 4 . 5 8 3 4 . 5 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 4 8 8 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 8 5 2 3 4 . 4 5 3 4 . 4 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 1 9 3 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 5 1 3 3 4 . 3 2 3 4 . 3 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 8 1 8 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 6 8 3 4 . 1 9 3 4 . 1 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 9 9 5 1 3 4 . 1 3 3 4 . 1 3 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 7 0 9 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 2 4 3 4 . 7 1 3 4 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 5 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 9 4 1 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 6 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 5 6 4 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 6 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 2 0 2 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 8 4 6 3 4 . 7 2 3 4 . 7 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 9 6 2 3 4 . 6 5 3 4 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 4 0 3 4 . 5 9 3 4 . 5 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 0 8 8 3 4 . 5 2 3 4 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 2 7 6 3 4 . 4 6 3 4 . 4 6 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 7 8 9 3 4 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 2 7 0 3 4 . 3 3 3 4 . 3 3 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 7 1 3 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 . 2 6 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 0 7 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 1 3 3 3 4 . 2 0 3 4 . 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 1 2 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 9 8 4 4 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 4 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 9 9 8 5 3 4 . 4 3 3 4 . 4 3 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 5 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 7 7 4 0 3 4 . 4 2 3 4 . 4 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 7 1 5 8 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 4 5 3 7 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 4 4 8 9 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 3 8 7 0 3 4 . 4 7 3 4 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 5 0 2 8 8 3 4 . 4 1 3 4 . 4 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 7 1 0 8 3 4 . 3 4 3 4 . 3 4 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 4 2 6 7 3 4 . 2 8 3 4 . 2 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 4 1 7 2 8 3 4 . 2 1 3 4 . 2 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 9 4 3 8 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 7 3 7 3 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 5 4 9 4 3 4 . 0 2 3 4 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 7 8 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 2 2 2 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 0 7 8 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 4 6 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 6 0 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 4 2 3 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 4 6 7 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 3 1 1 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 1 6 7 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 3 0 3 4 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 9 1 0 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 8 2 6 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 6 2 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 5 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 4 3 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 5 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 7 0 8 3 4 . 0 6 3 4 . 0 6 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 8 5 2 3 4 . 1 1 3 4 . 1 1 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 8 6 5 3 4 . 1 7 3 4 . 1 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 7 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 7 2 4 3 4 . 1 5 3 4 . 1 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 6 5 7 3 4 . 1 4 3 4 . 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 6 2 3 3 4 . 1 0 3 4 . 1 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 5 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 6 7 4 3 4 . 0 9 3 4 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 8 3 3 4 . 0 8 3 4 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 9 4 5 3 4 . 0 7 3 4 . 0 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 3 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 1 5 6 3 4 . 0 5 3 4 . 0 5 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 2 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 2 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 4 1 1 3 4 . 0 4 3 4 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 6 1 2 1 3 0 8 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 0 1 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 1 2 1 7 0 8 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 5 4 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 1 5 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 7 1 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 1 9 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 5 8 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 8 8 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 1 8 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 5 8 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 8 7 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 6 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 1 2 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 6 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 6 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 0 1 3 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 5 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 5 2 4 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 5 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 9 7 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 3 8 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 7 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 9 7 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 8 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 1 5 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 8 4 1 3 1 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 4 8 0 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 1 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 7 6 5 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 9 6 6 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 0 8 1 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 0 9 7 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 1 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 0 2 2 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 2 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 8 4 8 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 2 3 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 5 7 9 3 4 . 0 0 3 4 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 4 0 1 2 2 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 6 1 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 9 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 6 8 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 7 8 1 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 0 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 8 9 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 0 3 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 6 2 6 3 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 8 4 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 5 3 7 9 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 2 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 8 6 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 6 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 4 3 1 2 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 7 2 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 4 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 3 1 1 5 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 3 8 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 6 9 8 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 4 8 2 3 4 . 9 7 3 4 . 9 7 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 4 8 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 2 4 8 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 2 0 3 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 9 4 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 3 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 8 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 2 5 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 6 1 0 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 3 7 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 1 3 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 1 1 0 4 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 7 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 7 9 6 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 4 1 3 4 1 9 . 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 3 7 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 4 5 7 3 5 . 0 0 3 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 1 - H R A L L 1 S T 1 2 0 2 0 8 0 8 ** C O N C U N I T u g / m ^ 3 ** D E P U N I T g / m ^ 2 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Air Quality, Energy, GHG and HRA Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix F APPENDIX F CalEEMod Model Annual Printouts 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 639.00 Space 1.75 239,072.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 315.00 Dwelling Unit 3.42 378,112.00 901 Regional Shopping Center 3.41 1000sqft 0.08 3,413.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 756.4 0.014CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.003N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments Orange County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 1 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Project Characteristics - GHG Intensity Factors reduced by 51% to account for GHG reductions between the default year 2007 values and 2018 values. Land Use - Total Project Site 5.25 acres Construction Phase - Construction schedule provided by applicant Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips per day added to Demolition and Grading phases to account for water truck emissions Demolition - 51,300 sq ft of building space to be demolished (2,360 tons) + 4 acres of paved area (4,211 tons) = 6,571 tons of debris Grading - 3,500 cubic yards of dirt exported from project site Vehicle Trips - Daily trip rates from Traffic Report Woodstoves - No Woodstoves or Wood Fireplaces. 4 Natural Gas Fireplaces included to account for the proposed Fire Table and three Fire Pits. Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum requirements, water exposure 2x per day selected Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Urban, 60 Dwelling Units/acre, 0.02 mile to transit selected to account for OCTA Bus Route 42 and Improve Pedestrian Network Onsite and Connecting Offsite Energy Mitigation - Exceed Title 24 by 7% selected to account for the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards Water Mitigation - Install low flow fixtures and water-efficient irrigation selected to account for Title 24 Part 11 requirements Waste Mitigation - 50% reduction in waste selected to account for AB 341. Fleet Mix - Apartment vehicle mix adjusted so that trucks equal 2% of all trips. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces NumberGas 267.75 4.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 15.75 0.00 tblFleetMix HHD 0.02 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LDA 0.56 0.59 tblFleetMix LDT1 0.04 0.05 tblFleetMix LDT2 0.21 0.22 tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 5.0000e-003 tblFleetMix LHD2 5.7840e-003 2.0000e-003 tblFleetMix MCY 4.9410e-003 5.0000e-003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 2 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary tblFleetMix MDV 0.11 0.12 tblFleetMix MH 9.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.03 7.0000e-003 tblFleetMix OBUS 1.7750e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS 5.9800e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.5240e-003 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,500.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 255,600.00 239,072.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 315,000.00 378,112.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,410.00 3,413.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.75 1.75 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.29 3.42 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.014 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 756.4 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.003 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 37.75 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 15.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 15.75 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 3 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.0781 0.8551 0.5786 1.5800e- 003 0.1717 0.0331 0.2048 0.0540 0.0307 0.0847 0.0000 145.9968 145.9968 0.0269 0.0000 146.6681 2022 1.5798 2.6369 3.1452 8.7200e- 003 0.4535 0.0991 0.5526 0.1216 0.0931 0.2147 0.0000 791.7000 791.7000 0.0891 0.0000 793.9273 Maximum 1.5798 2.6369 3.1452 8.7200e- 003 0.4535 0.0991 0.5526 0.1216 0.0931 0.2147 0.0000 791.7000 791.7000 0.0891 0.0000 793.9273 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.0781 0.8551 0.5786 1.5800e- 003 0.0969 0.0331 0.1300 0.0296 0.0307 0.0603 0.0000 145.9967 145.9967 0.0269 0.0000 146.6680 2022 1.5798 2.6369 3.1452 8.7200e- 003 0.4535 0.0991 0.5526 0.1216 0.0931 0.2147 0.0000 791.6997 791.6997 0.0891 0.0000 793.9270 Maximum 1.5798 2.6369 3.1452 8.7200e- 003 0.4535 0.0991 0.5526 0.1216 0.0931 0.2147 0.0000 791.6997 791.6997 0.0891 0.0000 793.9270 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.97 0.00 9.88 13.90 0.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 4 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 Energy 0.0195 0.1662 0.0709 1.0600e- 003 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 1,116.1507 1,116.1507 0.0208 7.1900e- 003 1,118.8135 Mobile 0.4271 0.9249 6.0567 0.0225 2.3767 0.0156 2.3922 0.6322 0.0144 0.6466 0.0000 2,048.605 3 2,048.605 3 0.0613 0.0000 2,050.138 1 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 30.1401 0.0000 30.1401 1.7812 0.0000 74.6708 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.5913 142.7268 149.3181 0.6796 0.0166 171.2411 Total 2.0626 1.1295 9.3853 0.0237 2.3767 0.0471 2.4238 0.6322 0.0459 0.6781 36.7314 3,313.765 6 3,350.497 0 2.5481 0.0238 3,421.280 8 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-22-2021 1-21-2022 1.1211 1.1211 2 1-22-2022 4-21-2022 0.8328 0.8328 3 4-22-2022 7-21-2022 0.8369 0.8369 4 7-22-2022 9-30-2022 0.6530 0.6530 Highest 1.1211 1.1211 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 5 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 Energy 0.0187 0.1602 0.0683 1.0200e- 003 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0000 1,085.075 0 1,085.075 0 0.0202 6.9700e- 003 1,087.656 8 Mobile 0.3445 0.6410 3.6382 0.0121 1.2404 8.9800e- 003 1.2494 0.3300 8.2900e- 003 0.3382 0.0000 1,100.876 7 1,100.876 7 0.0356 0.0000 1,101.767 2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.0701 0.0000 15.0701 0.8906 0.0000 37.3354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2730 121.1189 126.3920 0.5438 0.0133 143.9418 Total 1.9793 0.8396 6.9643 0.0133 1.2404 0.0400 1.2804 0.3300 0.0393 0.3693 20.3431 2,313.353 4 2,333.696 5 1.4954 0.0203 2,377.118 4 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.04 25.67 25.80 44.01 47.81 15.02 47.17 47.81 14.32 45.54 44.62 30.19 30.35 41.31 14.73 30.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 6 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/22/2021 11/18/2021 5 20 2 Grading Grading 11/19/2021 12/16/2021 5 20 3 Building Construction Building Construction 12/17/2021 11/3/2022 5 230 4 Paving Paving 11/4/2022 12/1/2022 5 20 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/2/2022 12/29/2022 5 20 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 765,677; Residential Outdoor: 255,226; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,120; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,707; Striped Parking Area: 14,344 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10 Acres of Paving: 1.75 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 7 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 6.00 650.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 438.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 328.00 73.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 66.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 8 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0703 0.0000 0.0703 0.0107 0.0000 0.0107 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e- 003 0.0000 34.2400 Total 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e- 004 0.0703 0.0155 0.0858 0.0107 0.0144 0.0251 0.0000 34.0008 34.0008 9.5700e- 003 0.0000 34.2400 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 9 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 2.3700e- 003 0.0852 0.0232 2.4000e- 004 5.5700e- 003 2.6000e- 004 5.8300e- 003 1.5300e- 003 2.5000e- 004 1.7800e- 003 0.0000 24.6852 24.6852 2.6000e- 003 0.0000 24.7502 Vendor 1.6000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 1.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4480 1.4480 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4509 Worker 5.5000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3758 1.3758 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3765 Total 3.0800e- 003 0.0913 0.0291 2.7000e- 004 7.6000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 7.8800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.7000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 27.5090 27.5090 2.7500e- 003 0.0000 27.5777 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0316 0.0000 0.0316 4.7900e- 003 0.0000 4.7900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0144 0.0144 0.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e- 003 0.0000 34.2400 Total 0.0317 0.3144 0.2157 3.9000e- 004 0.0316 0.0155 0.0472 4.7900e- 003 0.0144 0.0192 0.0000 34.0007 34.0007 9.5700e- 003 0.0000 34.2400 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 10 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 2.3700e- 003 0.0852 0.0232 2.4000e- 004 5.5700e- 003 2.6000e- 004 5.8300e- 003 1.5300e- 003 2.5000e- 004 1.7800e- 003 0.0000 24.6852 24.6852 2.6000e- 003 0.0000 24.7502 Vendor 1.6000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 1.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4480 1.4480 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4509 Worker 5.5000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3758 1.3758 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3765 Total 3.0800e- 003 0.0913 0.0291 2.7000e- 004 7.6000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 7.8800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.7000e- 004 2.3500e- 003 0.0000 27.5090 27.5090 2.7500e- 003 0.0000 27.5777 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0657 0.0000 0.0657 0.0337 0.0000 0.0337 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0229 0.2474 0.1586 3.0000e- 004 0.0116 0.0116 0.0107 0.0107 0.0000 26.0537 26.0537 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 26.2644 Total 0.0229 0.2474 0.1586 3.0000e- 004 0.0657 0.0116 0.0773 0.0337 0.0107 0.0444 0.0000 26.0537 26.0537 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 26.2644 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 11 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.5900e- 003 0.0574 0.0156 1.6000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.8000e- 004 3.9300e- 003 1.0300e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 16.6340 16.6340 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 16.6779 Vendor 1.6000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 1.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4480 1.4480 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4509 Worker 5.5000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3758 1.3758 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3765 Total 2.3000e- 003 0.0635 0.0215 1.9000e- 004 5.7800e- 003 2.0000e- 004 5.9800e- 003 1.5800e- 003 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 0.0000 19.4578 19.4578 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 19.5053 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0296 0.0000 0.0296 0.0152 0.0000 0.0152 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0229 0.2474 0.1586 3.0000e- 004 0.0116 0.0116 0.0107 0.0107 0.0000 26.0537 26.0537 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 26.2643 Total 0.0229 0.2474 0.1586 3.0000e- 004 0.0296 0.0116 0.0412 0.0152 0.0107 0.0258 0.0000 26.0537 26.0537 8.4300e- 003 0.0000 26.2643 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 12 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.5900e- 003 0.0574 0.0156 1.6000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.8000e- 004 3.9300e- 003 1.0300e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 16.6340 16.6340 1.7500e- 003 0.0000 16.6779 Vendor 1.6000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 1.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4480 1.4480 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4509 Worker 5.5000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.3100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3758 1.3758 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3765 Total 2.3000e- 003 0.0635 0.0215 1.9000e- 004 5.7800e- 003 2.0000e- 004 5.9800e- 003 1.5800e- 003 1.9000e- 004 1.7700e- 003 0.0000 19.4578 19.4578 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 19.5053 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0105 0.0959 0.0912 1.5000e- 004 5.2700e- 003 5.2700e- 003 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 12.7401 12.7401 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 12.8169 Total 0.0105 0.0959 0.0912 1.5000e- 004 5.2700e- 003 5.2700e- 003 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 12.7401 12.7401 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 12.8169 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 13 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0900e- 003 0.0383 0.0107 1.0000e- 004 2.5300e- 003 8.0000e- 005 2.6100e- 003 7.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 9.6893 9.6893 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.7090 Worker 6.6100e- 003 4.4400e- 003 0.0518 1.8000e- 004 0.0198 1.3000e- 004 0.0199 5.2600e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.3800e- 003 0.0000 16.5461 16.5461 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.5550 Total 7.7000e- 003 0.0427 0.0625 2.8000e- 004 0.0223 2.1000e- 004 0.0225 5.9900e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.1800e- 003 0.0000 26.2354 26.2354 1.1300e- 003 0.0000 26.2639 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0105 0.0959 0.0912 1.5000e- 004 5.2700e- 003 5.2700e- 003 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 12.7400 12.7400 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 12.8169 Total 0.0105 0.0959 0.0912 1.5000e- 004 5.2700e- 003 5.2700e- 003 4.9600e- 003 4.9600e- 003 0.0000 12.7400 12.7400 3.0700e- 003 0.0000 12.8169 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 14 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.0900e- 003 0.0383 0.0107 1.0000e- 004 2.5300e- 003 8.0000e- 005 2.6100e- 003 7.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 004 0.0000 9.6893 9.6893 7.8000e- 004 0.0000 9.7090 Worker 6.6100e- 003 4.4400e- 003 0.0518 1.8000e- 004 0.0198 1.3000e- 004 0.0199 5.2600e- 003 1.2000e- 004 5.3800e- 003 0.0000 16.5461 16.5461 3.5000e- 004 0.0000 16.5550 Total 7.7000e- 003 0.0427 0.0625 2.8000e- 004 0.0223 2.1000e- 004 0.0225 5.9900e- 003 2.0000e- 004 6.1800e- 003 0.0000 26.2354 26.2354 1.1300e- 003 0.0000 26.2639 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1868 1.7099 1.7918 2.9500e- 003 0.0886 0.0886 0.0834 0.0834 0.0000 253.7391 253.7391 0.0608 0.0000 255.2589 Total 0.1868 1.7099 1.7918 2.9500e- 003 0.0886 0.0886 0.0834 0.0834 0.0000 253.7391 253.7391 0.0608 0.0000 255.2589 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 15 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0205 0.7197 0.2060 1.9300e- 003 0.0503 1.3800e- 003 0.0517 0.0145 1.3200e- 003 0.0158 0.0000 191.0038 191.0038 0.0151 0.0000 191.3816 Worker 0.1245 0.0802 0.9619 3.5100e- 003 0.3943 2.5500e- 003 0.3968 0.1047 2.3500e- 003 0.1071 0.0000 317.2221 317.2221 6.4000e- 003 0.0000 317.3822 Total 0.1450 0.7999 1.1678 5.4400e- 003 0.4446 3.9300e- 003 0.4485 0.1192 3.6700e- 003 0.1229 0.0000 508.2259 508.2259 0.0215 0.0000 508.7638 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1868 1.7099 1.7918 2.9500e- 003 0.0886 0.0886 0.0834 0.0834 0.0000 253.7388 253.7388 0.0608 0.0000 255.2586 Total 0.1868 1.7099 1.7918 2.9500e- 003 0.0886 0.0886 0.0834 0.0834 0.0000 253.7388 253.7388 0.0608 0.0000 255.2586 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 16 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0205 0.7197 0.2060 1.9300e- 003 0.0503 1.3800e- 003 0.0517 0.0145 1.3200e- 003 0.0158 0.0000 191.0038 191.0038 0.0151 0.0000 191.3816 Worker 0.1245 0.0802 0.9619 3.5100e- 003 0.3943 2.5500e- 003 0.3968 0.1047 2.3500e- 003 0.1071 0.0000 317.2221 317.2221 6.4000e- 003 0.0000 317.3822 Total 0.1450 0.7999 1.1678 5.4400e- 003 0.4446 3.9300e- 003 0.4485 0.1192 3.6700e- 003 0.1229 0.0000 508.2259 508.2259 0.0215 0.0000 508.7638 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0110 0.1113 0.1458 2.3000e- 004 5.6800e- 003 5.6800e- 003 5.2200e- 003 5.2200e- 003 0.0000 20.0276 20.0276 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1895 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0110 0.1113 0.1458 2.3000e- 004 5.6800e- 003 5.6800e- 003 5.2200e- 003 5.2200e- 003 0.0000 20.0276 20.0276 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1895 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 17 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 4.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3249 1.3249 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3255 Total 5.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 4.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3249 1.3249 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3255 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0110 0.1113 0.1458 2.3000e- 004 5.6800e- 003 5.6800e- 003 5.2200e- 003 5.2200e- 003 0.0000 20.0275 20.0275 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1895 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0110 0.1113 0.1458 2.3000e- 004 5.6800e- 003 5.6800e- 003 5.2200e- 003 5.2200e- 003 0.0000 20.0275 20.0275 6.4800e- 003 0.0000 20.1895 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 18 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 4.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3249 1.3249 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3255 Total 5.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 4.0200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.3249 1.3249 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3255 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 1.2320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0500e- 003 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5574 Total 1.2341 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5574 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 19 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2900e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0177 6.0000e- 005 7.2500e- 003 5.0000e- 005 7.2900e- 003 1.9200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.8293 5.8293 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.8323 Total 2.2900e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0177 6.0000e- 005 7.2500e- 003 5.0000e- 005 7.2900e- 003 1.9200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.8293 5.8293 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.8323 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 1.2320 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0500e- 003 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5574 Total 1.2341 0.0141 0.0181 3.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.5574 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 20 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Density Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2900e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0177 6.0000e- 005 7.2500e- 003 5.0000e- 005 7.2900e- 003 1.9200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.8293 5.8293 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.8323 Total 2.2900e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0177 6.0000e- 005 7.2500e- 003 5.0000e- 005 7.2900e- 003 1.9200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 1.9700e- 003 0.0000 5.8293 5.8293 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 5.8323 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 21 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.3445 0.6410 3.6382 0.0121 1.2404 8.9800e- 003 1.2494 0.3300 8.2900e- 003 0.3382 0.0000 1,100.876 7 1,100.876 7 0.0356 0.0000 1,101.767 2 Unmitigated 0.4271 0.9249 6.0567 0.0225 2.3767 0.0156 2.3922 0.6322 0.0144 0.6466 0.0000 2,048.605 3 2,048.605 3 0.0613 0.0000 2,050.138 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 1,713.60 2,012.85 1845.90 6,066,299 3,166,096 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 128.73 170.40 86.07 278,112 145,151 Total 1,842.33 2,183.25 1,931.97 6,344,411 3,311,247 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 22 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 899.5877 899.5877 0.0167 3.5700e- 003 901.0672 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 923.6954 923.6954 0.0171 3.6600e- 003 925.2146 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0187 0.1602 0.0683 1.0200e- 003 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0130 0.0000 185.4873 185.4873 3.5600e- 003 3.4000e- 003 186.5896 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0195 0.1662 0.0709 1.0600e- 003 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 192.4553 192.4553 3.6900e- 003 3.5300e- 003 193.5990 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.593000 0.045000 0.220000 0.116000 0.005000 0.002000 0.007000 0.007000 0.000000 0.000000 0.005000 0.000000 0.000000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Regional Shopping Center 0.563406 0.043070 0.209298 0.109958 0.015015 0.005784 0.026182 0.017546 0.001775 0.001524 0.004941 0.000598 0.000904 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 23 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 3.59965e +006 0.0194 0.1659 0.0706 1.0600e- 003 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 192.0910 192.0910 3.6800e- 003 3.5200e- 003 193.2325 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 6826 4.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3643 0.3643 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3664 Total 0.0195 0.1662 0.0709 1.0600e- 003 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 192.4553 192.4553 3.6900e- 003 3.5300e- 003 193.5990 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 3.4693e +006 0.0187 0.1599 0.0680 1.0200e- 003 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0000 185.1352 185.1352 3.5500e- 003 3.3900e- 003 186.2353 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 6599.04 4.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3522 0.3522 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3542 Total 0.0188 0.1602 0.0683 1.0200e- 003 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0000 185.4873 185.4873 3.5600e- 003 3.4000e- 003 186.5896 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 24 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 1.25222e +006 429.6331 7.9500e- 003 1.7000e- 003 430.3397 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1.40096e +006 480.6662 8.9000e- 003 1.9100e- 003 481.4567 Regional Shopping Center 39044.7 13.3961 2.5000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 13.4182 Total 923.6954 0.0171 3.6600e- 003 925.2146 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 1.24826e +006 428.2732 7.9300e- 003 1.7000e- 003 428.9775 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1.33536e +006 458.1586 8.4800e- 003 1.8200e- 003 458.9121 Regional Shopping Center 38344.7 13.1560 2.4000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 13.1776 Total 899.5877 0.0167 3.5700e- 003 901.0672 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 25 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 Unmitigated 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 26 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.1232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3941 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.0000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9606 0.9606 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.9663 Landscaping 0.0987 0.0375 3.2574 1.7000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0180 0.0180 0.0000 5.3223 5.3223 5.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.4509 Total 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 27 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Use Water Efficient Irrigation System 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.1232 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 1.3941 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 1.0000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9606 0.9606 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.9663 Landscaping 0.0987 0.0375 3.2574 1.7000e- 004 0.0180 0.0180 0.0180 0.0180 0.0000 5.3223 5.3223 5.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.4509 Total 1.6160 0.0384 3.2578 1.8000e- 004 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0181 0.0000 6.2828 6.2828 5.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.4172 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 28 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 126.3920 0.5438 0.0133 143.9418 Unmitigated 149.3181 0.6796 0.0166 171.2411 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 20.5235 / 12.9387 147.5194 0.6714 0.0164 169.1759 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.252587 / 0.154812 1.7987 8.2600e- 003 2.0000e- 004 2.0652 Total 149.3181 0.6796 0.0166 171.2411 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 29 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 16.4188 / 12.1495 124.8710 0.5372 0.0131 142.2075 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.20207 / 0.145368 1.5210 6.6100e- 003 1.6000e- 004 1.7343 Total 126.3920 0.5438 0.0133 143.9418 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 30 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 15.0701 0.8906 0.0000 37.3354 Unmitigated 30.1401 1.7812 0.0000 74.6708 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 144.9 29.4134 1.7383 0.0000 72.8704 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 3.58 0.7267 0.0430 0.0000 1.8004 Total 30.1401 1.7812 0.0000 74.6708 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 31 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 72.45 14.7067 0.8691 0.0000 36.4352 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 1.79 0.3634 0.0215 0.0000 0.9002 Total 15.0701 0.8906 0.0000 37.3354 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 32 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 10/31/2019 3:56 PMPage 33 of 33 1600 W Lincoln Ave Apartments - Orange County, Annual 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project Anaheim, California, VCS Environmental March 2020 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE 1600 W. LINCOLN AVENUE APARTMENTS PROJECT ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Development Project No. DEV2017-00128 Prepared For Christine Saunders Senior Project Manager Sagecrest Planning+Environmental 2400 E Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Prepared By Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 pmaxon@vcsenvironmental.com March 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page National Archaeological Database (NADB) Information Sheet ................................................ S-1 Management Summary ........................................................................................................... S-2 1.0 Undertaking Information/Introduction ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Site ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Personnel................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................................ 2 2.1 California Environmental Quality Act ................................................................... 2 2.2 Human Remains ................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Project Setting .............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Existing Setting ................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Geologic Setting ................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Cultural Setting ................................................................................................... 4 Prehistoric Background ....................................................................................... 4 3.4 Ethnographic Setting ........................................................................................... 6 Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh ....................................................................................... 6 3.5 Historic Setting .................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Methods ........................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Cultural Resources Records Search ................................................................... 7 4.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search ....................................................... 7 4.3 Native American Consultation ............................................................................. 7 4.4 Pedestrian Survey ............................................................................................... 7 4.5 Built Environment Evaluation .............................................................................. 7 5.0 Results .......................................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Cultural Resources Records Search ................................................................... 8 5.2 Paleontological Resources Records Search ....................................................... 9 5.3 Native American Consultation ............................................................................. 9 5.4 Pedestrian Survey ............................................................................................... 9 5.5 Built Environment Evaluation .............................................................................. 9 6.0 Recommended Mitigation Measures ......................................................................... 10 6.1 Archaeological Resources .................................................................................10 6.2 Paleontological Resources .................................................................................10 6.3 Historic-Era Resources ......................................................................................11 6.4 Regulatory Requirement ....................................................................................11 7.0 Certification ................................................................................................................ 11 8.0 References .................................................................................................................. 12 TABLES Table Page Table 1: Cultural Resources Studies Within One-Half Mile of the Project Site ............................ 8 Table 2: Cultural Resources Recorded Within One-Half Mile of the Project Site ........................ 8 EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page Exhibit 1: Project Site USGS Quadrangle........………………………………………………………..1 Exhibit 2: Project Site Aerial……………………………….…………………………………………….1 Attachments A Cultural Resources Records Search (EIC) B Paleontological Resources Records Search (NHMLAC) C Sacred Lands File Search and Contacts List (NAHC) D Historic Resource Evaluation Report (Daly 2019) E Personnel Qualifications U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx NADB Information Sheet S-1 PHASE I CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE 1600 W. LINCOLN AVENUE APARTMENTS PROJECT ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA By Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. March 2020 Submitted by: VCS Environmental Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA 30900 Rancho Viejo Road San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 (949) 489-2700 Submitted to: Christine Saunders Senior Project Manager Sagecrest Planning+Environmental 2400 E Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Section 16, Township 4 South; Range 10 West on the USGS Anaheim 7.5-Minute Quadrangle (S.B.B.M.) Key Words: 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments; Anaheim; McCoy Ford U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Management Summary S-2 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PURPOSE AND SCOPE VCS Environmental was retained by Sagecrest Planning and Environmental to complete a partial California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) cultural resources assessment for the 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project. The Development Project Number is DEV2017-00128. The study described in this report consists of cultural and paleontological resources records searches and an historic-era built environment evaluation of existing structures on the Project site. Tribal consultation under SB 18 is required because the project requires a General Plan amendment, and under AB 52 as a CEQA project. This consultation is not part of this study. The report follows the guidelines contained in Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format (Office of Historic Preservation 1990). DATES OF INVESTIGATION A records search and literature review requested of the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) for the Project site was completed on February 18, 2019 (Attachment A). A paleontological records search was completed by Sam McLeod of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) On January 24, 2019 (Attachment B). A Sacred Lands File search was completed by the Native American Heritage Committee (NAHC) on March 4, 2020 (Attachment C). An evaluation of the built environment on the site was completed by Pam Daly or Daly and Associates on April 29, 2019 (Attachment D). This report was completed by Patrick Maxon, RPA and Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. in March 2020. Personnel qualification are in Attachment E. FINDINGS OF THE INVESTIGATION The SCCIC records search failed to identify any cultural resources recorded within the project site boundaries. The Sacred Lands File search performed by the NAHC was negative. The NHMLAC records search identified sensitive paleontological sediments at depth. The historic evaluation (Daly 2019:24) resulted in a finding of not eligible for listing in the National Register and California Register. CONSTRAINTS The entire site is developed with buildings, parking lots, and sidewalks. No open ground is present. RECOMMENDATIONS/MITIGATION MEASURES Archaeological Resources No cultural resources were identified as a result of the records searches and the sacred lands file search, and because of the total development of the project site, the presence of cultural resources in the subsurface is unlikely. However, because of the relative proximity to the Santa Ana River floodplain, there remains the potential for buried resources to be present. Therefore, it is recommended that an archaeologist be on-call during project grading activities, prepared to examine and evaluate any discoveries. The following mitigation measure describes the recommended action: MM-1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Archaeologist shall be retained to be on-call during grading activities in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Management Summary S-3 Archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference and shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work, if any is ongoing, to protect the find and permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the discovery when the Archaeologist is present. If archaeological resources are discovered, the Archaeologist shall be immediately informed and shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the lead agency, for exploration and/or salvage of the find. Significant sites that cannot be avoided may require data recovery measures and shall be completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan. Paleontological Resources The Paleontological records search revealed that paleontologically sensitive older Quaternary alluvium lies at what could be relatively shallow depth below younger Quaternary Alluvium at the surface. Excavations into the deeper, finer-grained older Quaternary Alluvium may encounter significant vertebrate fossils. These deeper excavations; therefore, should be monitored by a qualified paleontologist to identify and recover any significant fossil remains. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. MM-2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre-grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. Implementation of these mitigation measures would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. Historic-Era Resources The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue and the buildings therein, home of the McCoy Ford dealership from 1965 to 2014, does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or California Register as a historical resource. For purposes of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue is assigned California Historical Resource Status Code 6Z, to represent a property that has been found ineligible for listing in the National Register or California Register through survey evaluation. Regulatory Requirement RR-1. Project-related earth disturbance has the potential to unearth previously undiscovered human remains, resulting in a potentially significant impact. If human remains are encountered during excavation activities, all work shall halt and the County Coroner shall be notified (California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, s/he will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall be responsible for designating the most likely descendant (MLD), who will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The MLD shall make his/her recommendation within 48 hours of being U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Management Summary S-4 granted access to the site. The MLD’s recommendation shall be followed if feasible, and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials (California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5). If the landowner rejects the MLD’s recommendations, the landowner may elect to rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location that will not be subject to further subsurface disturbance (California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98). Compliance with Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code would preclude significant impacts to human remains. DISPOSITION OF DATA This report will be filed with the Sagecrest Planning and Environmental, the SCCIC, and with VCS. All notes and other documentation related to the study are on file at the VCS Orange County office. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 1 1.0 UNDERTAKING INFORMATION/INTRODUCTION Inland Harbor, LLC retained VCS to complete a Phase I cultural resources study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed Clay Street project. KNT I Enterprises, LLC (Applicant) proposes to demolish an existing auto dealership and repair facility and construct a mixed-use development consisting of 315 residential apartment (rental) units with 678 parking spaces and 10,500 sq. ft. of retail space (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project would implement the City’s Mixed Use overlay standards with a residential density of 60 dwelling units/acre. Residential units consist of a mix of studio, 1-bedroom, and 2-bedroom units totaling approximately 243,448 square feet of rentable area with 678 parking stalls contained within the parking structure. The Proposed Project will also feature approximately 66,007 square feet of interior amenity space, lushly landscape courtyards, pool and spa area, fitness center and an approximately 2,877 square feet leasing office, and 10,500 square feet of retail. 1.1 PROJECT SITE The Proposed Project is located on 5.28-acres consisting of two parcels, Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 250-091-09&10, 250-091-11 located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue. The Project Site is bordered by West Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, Loara Elementary School, a single-family residence and commercial development to the south, and a multifamily residential community to the west. The Project site can be seen on the USGS 7.5’ Anaheim Quadrangle (Exhibit 1) and on an aerial photograph (Exhibit 2) below. 1.2 PROJECT PERSONNEL This cultural resources study was completed by Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA and Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. Personnel qualifications are located in Attachment E. I 1:24,000 Map Created: Jan 2019 7.5-min Quadrangle: Anaheim Section S16 Township T4S R10W Meridian San Bernardino State California County Orange Prepared By: VCS Environmental 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000Feet Project Site 1600 W. Lincoln Project Exhibit 1: USGS Topography I 1:3,000 Map Created: Feb 2019 Prepared By: VCS Environmental 0 50 100 150 200Feet Imagery Source: BING Project Site 1600 W. Lincoln Project Exhibit 2: Aerial U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 2 2.0 REGULATORY SETTING This section contains a discussion of the applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards that govern cultural resources and must be adhered to both prior to and during project implementation. The report is intended to satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC], Section 21083.2) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, Section 15064.5), as well as the cultural resources goals set forth in the City of Jurupa Valley Draft General Plan (2017). 2.1 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to determine whether a project would have a significant effect on one or more historical resources. According to Section 15064.5(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a “historical resource” is defined as a resource listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) (PRC Section21084.1); a resource included in a local register of historical resources (14 CCR 15064.5[a][2]); or any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant (14 CCR 15064.5[a][3]). The basic guidelines that were used for the cultural resources study were Section 5024.1 of the PRC; Section 15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR); and Sections 21083.2 and 21084.1 of the CEQA Statutes. PRC 5024.1 requires evaluation of historical resources to determine their eligibility for listing on the CRHR. The purpose of the CRHR is to maintain a list of the State’s historical resources and to indicate which properties are to be protected from substantial adverse change. The criteria for listing resources in the CRHR, which were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP (per the criteria listed at 36 CFR 60.4), are stated below. The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association and that: (1) Are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; or (2) Are associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; or (3) Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values; or (4) Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. In addition, according to Section 15064.5(a)(3)(A–D) of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR), a resource is considered historically significant if it meets the criteria for listing in the NRHP (per the criteria listed at 36 CFR 60.4). Impacts that affect those characteristics of the resource that qualify it for the NRHP or that would adversely alter the significance of a resource listed in or eligible for listing in the CRHR are considered to have a significant effect on the environment. Impacts to cultural resources from a proposed project are thus considered significant if the project would (1) physically destroy or damage all or part of a resource; (2) change the character of the use of the resource or physical feature within the setting of the resource that contributes to its significance; U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 3 or (3) introduce visual, atmospheric, or audible elements that diminish the integrity of significant features of the resource. The purpose of a cultural resources investigation is to evaluate whether any cultural resources remain exposed on the surface of the project site or can reasonably be expected to exist in the subsurface. If resources are discovered, management recommendations would be required for evaluation of the resources for NRHP or CRHR eligibility. Broad mitigation guidelines for treating historical resources are codified in Section 15126.4(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines. To the extent feasible, public agencies should seek to avoid significant effects to historical resources, with preservation in place being the preferred alternative. If not feasible, a data recovery plan shall be prepared to guide subsequent excavation. Mitigation for historical resources (e.g., buildings, bridges, and other structures) that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Weeks and Grimmer 1995) is generally considered mitigated to below a level of significance. 2.2 HUMAN REMAINS Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code provides for the disposition of accidentally discovered human remains. Section 7050.5 states that, if human remains are found, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. Section 5097.98 of the PRC states that, if remains are determined by the Coroner to be of Native American origin, they must notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours which, in turn, must identify the person or persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendant(s) shall complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 4 3.0 PROJECT SETTING 3.1 EXISTING SETTING Situated adjacent West Lincoln Avenue, just west and south of Interstate 5, the Project site is in a fully developed section of Anaheim. The entire Project site has been heavily impacted by historic and modern industrial and commercial activities and the results of those activities can still be seen on the site. An existing auto dealership and repair facility, consisting of four building complexes including warehouses, sales offices, and garages. Parking lots cover the remainder of the site. 3.2 GEOLOGIC SETTING The project site is located at the northern portion of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province—a linear structural block extending from the Transverse Ranges to the north to the tip of Baja California to the south. The mountains and valleys extend in a northwest/southeast direction (Norris and Webb 1976). The Los Angeles Basin, in which the Project site is situated, is a broad alluvial lowland or coastal plain within the province, bound by the San Gabriel and Santa Ana Mountains and the Pacific Ocean. The basin has been uplifted, subsided, eroded, and has accumulated alluvial sediment from the Santa Ana River and Carbon Creek drainages for millennia (Yerkes et al. 1965). These older Alluvial sediments are paleontologically sensitive. 3.3 CULTURAL SETTING Prehistoric Background Several chronologies are generally used to describe the sequence of the later prehistoric periods of Southern California. William Wallace (1955) developed the first comprehensive California chronologies and defines four periods for the southern coastal region. Wallace’s synthesis is largely “descriptive and classificatory, emphasizing the content of archaeological cultures and the relationships among them” (Moratto 1984:159). Wallace relies upon the concept of “cultural horizons”, which are generally defined by the temporal and spatial distribution of a set of normative cultural traits, such as the distribution of a group of commonly associated artifact types. As a result, Wallace’s model does not allow for much cultural variation in the same time period, nor does it provide precise chronological dates for each temporal division. Although now more than 50 years old, the general schema of the Wallace chronology has provided a general framework for Southern California prehistory that remains valid today. Horizon I: Early Man or Paleo-Indian Period (11,000 BCE 1 to 7,500 BCE). While Wallace (1955) initially termed this period the Early Man Horizon (I), this early stage of human occupation is commonly referred to as the Paleo-Indian Period today (Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984:24). The precise start of this period is still a topic of considerable debate. At inland archaeological sites, the surviving material culture of this period is primarily lithic, consisting of large, extremely well made stone projectile points and tools such as scrapers and choppers. Encampments were probably temporary, located near major kills or important resource areas. Horizon II: Milling Stone Assemblages (7,500 BCE to 1,000 BCE). Encompassing a broad expanse of time, the Milling Stone Period was named for the abundant millingstone tools associated with sites of this period. These tools, the mano and metate, were used to process small, hard seeds from plants associated with shrub-scrub vegetation communities. An annual round of seasonal migrations was likely practiced, with movements coinciding with ripening 1 BCE is defined as “Before Common Era” and generally refers to that time period commonly referred to as “Before Christ” (B.C.). U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 5 vegetal resources and the periods of maximal availability of various animal resources. Along the coast, shell midden sites are common site types. Some formal burials, occasionally with associated grave goods, are also evident. This period of time is roughly equivalent to Warren’s (1968) Encinitas Tradition. Warren (1968) suggests that, as millingstones are common and projectile points are comparatively rare during this period of time, hunting was less important than the gathering of vegetable resources. More recent studies suggest that a diversity of subsistence activities, including hunting of various game animals, were practiced during this period (Koerper 1981; Koerper and Drover 1983). At present, little is known about cultural change during this time period in Southern California. While this lack of noticeable change gives the appearance of cultural stasis, almost certainly many regional and temporal cultural shifts did occur. Future research that is focused on temporal change in the Milling Stone Period would greatly benefit the current understanding of Southern California prehistory. Horizon III: Intermediate Cultures (1,000 BCE to 750 CE2). The Intermediate Period is identified by a mixed strategy of plant exploitation, terrestrial hunting, and maritime subsistence strategies. Chipped stone tools (e.g., projectile points) generally decrease in size, but increase in number. Abundant bone and shell remains have been recovered from sites dating to these time periods. In coastal areas, the introduction of the circular shell fishhook and the growing abundance of fish remains in sites over the course of the period suggest a substantial increase in fishing activity during the Intermediate Horizon. It is also during this time period that mortar and pestle use intensified dramatically. The mano and metate continued to be in use on a reduced scale, but the greatly intensified use of the mortar and pestle signaled a shift away from a subsistence strategy based on seed resources to that of the acorn. It is probably during this time period that the acorn became the food staple of the majority of the indigenous tribes in Southern California. This subsistence strategy continued until European contact. Material culture became more diverse and elaborate and included steatite containers, perforated stones, bone tools, ornamental items, and asphalt adhesive. Horizon IV: Late Prehistoric Cultures (750 CE to 1769 CE). During the Late Prehistoric Period, exploitation of many food resources, particularly marine resources among coastal groups, continued to intensify. The material culture in the Late Prehistoric Horizon increased in complexity in terms of the abundance and diversity of artifacts being produced. The recovery and identification of a number of small projectile points during this period likely suggests a greater utilization of the bow and arrow, which was likely introduced near the end of the Intermediate Period. Shell beads, ornaments, and other elements of material culture continue to be ornate, varied, and widely distributed; the latter evidence suggests elaborate trade networks. Warren’s (1968) scheme divides the late prehistoric period into several regional traditions. Western Riverside County, Orange County, and the Los Angeles Basin area are considered part of the “Shoshonean” tradition, which may be related to a possible incursion of Takic speakers into these areas during this period. The Late Prehistoric Period includes the first few centuries of early European contact (1542–1769 CE); it is also known as the Protohistoric Period as there was a low level of interaction between native Californians and Europeans prior to Portolá’s overland expedition in 1769. In the few centuries prior to European contact, the archaeological record reveals substantial increases in the indigenous population (Wallace 1955:223). Some village sites may have contained as many as 1,500 individuals. Apparently, many of these village sites were occupied throughout the year rather than seasonally. This shift in settlement strategy was likely influenced 2 CE is defined as “Common Era” and generally refers to that time period commonly referred to as “annō Dominī” (A.D.). U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 6 by improved food procurement and storage technology, which enabled population growth and may have helped stimulate changes in sociopolitical organization. Evidence is growing that prehistoric cultural change has been much more variable through time and across culture areas than previously thought. Cultural traits such as maritime economies, seafaring, complex trade networks, and year-round occupation of villages appear to have developed much earlier than previously thought. Culture change during the Late Prehistoric Period, in particular, may have been driven more by environmental and resource pressures than optimal adaptation to the environment (Byrd and Raab 2007). 3.4 ETHNOGRAPHIC SETTING Gabrielino/Tongva/Kizh At the time of European contact, this part of Orange County was the home of the Gabrielino. The Gabrielino are those people and their descendants who became associated with Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, which was established in south-central Los Angeles County on September 8, 1771, in what has ever since been called the San Gabriel Valley. Today, these people are sometimes referred to as the Tongva, although the term apparently originally (i.e., before the arrival of Euro-Americans) referred to the inhabitants of the San Gabriel Valley only, or the Kizh. In either case, the inhabitants of Santa Catalina Island and San Clemente Island are often included as being parts of this tribe, as are the Fernandeño, who inhabited most of the San Fernando Valley. The ancestral Gabrielino arrived in the Los Angeles Basin probably before 500 BCE as part of the so-called Shoshonean (Takic speaking) Wedge from the Great Basin region and gradually displaced the indigenous peoples, who were probably Hokan speakers. Large, permanent villages were established in the fertile lowlands along rivers and streams and in sheltered areas along the coast. Eventually, Gabrielino territory encompassed the watersheds of the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, Rio Hondo, and Santa Ana Rivers, which includes the greater Los Angeles Basin, to perhaps as far south as Aliso Creek, as well as portions of the San Fernando, San Gabriel, and San Bernardino Valleys. Gabrielino territory also included the islands of San Clemente, San Nicholas, and Santa Catalina (McCawley 1996:23–24; Bean and Smith 1978:538–540). Populations may have numbered as many as 10,000 individuals at their peak in the Precontact Period. The subsistence economy of the Gabrielino was one of hunting and gathering. The surrounding environment was rich and varied, and the natives were able to exploit mountains, foothills, valleys, deserts, and coasts. As was the case for most native Californians, acorns were the staple food (by the Intermediate Horizon), supplemented by the roots, leaves, seeds, and fruit of a wide variety of flora (i.e., cactus, yucca, sage, and agave). Fresh and saltwater fish, shellfish, birds, insects, and large and small mammals were exploited. Kroeber (1925:621) considered the Gabrielino: . . . to have been the most advanced group south of Tehachapi, except perhaps the Chumash. They certainly were the wealthiest and most thoughtful of all the Shoshoneans of the State, and dominated these civilizations wherever contacts occurred. The ethnohistoric Gabrielino community known to be located nearest the Project site was known as Hotuuknga. It was reported as meaning “night”. The village was located adjacent the Santa Ana River, on the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana; the site of the former Bernardo Yorba adobe. It was downstream of Santa Ana Canyon, approximately one-quarter mile upstream of the Yorba Church (McCawley 1996:59–60). U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 7 3.5 HISTORIC SETTING See Daly (2019) in Attachment D. 4.0 METHODS 4.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH A Records search and literature review of the Project site was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF) on February 18, 2019 (Attachment A). Sources consulted included archaeological records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, historic maps, and the Historic Property Data File (HPDF) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation. The HPDF contains listings for the CRHR and/or NRHP, California Historical Landmarks, and California Points of Historical Interest. This report was completed in April 2019. It follows the guidelines contained in Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format (Office of Historic Preservation 1990). 4.2 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH Sam McLeod of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) conducted a review of the museum’s geologic and vertebrate paleontological records for the Project site and vicinity on January 24, 2019 (Attachment B). 4.3 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION Native American scoping and consultation under Assembly Bill (AB) 52 is being undertaken by the City of Anaheim and is not a part of this study; however, a Sacred Lands File search request was made to the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on February 26, 2020 (Attachment C). 4.4 PEDESTRIAN SURVEY An architectural history pedestrian survey was conducted by Pamela Daly in April 2019. The site was examined via a combination of pedestrian and windshield survey. An archaeological survey was not conducted. 4.5 BUILT ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION This historic resource assessment, and evaluation of the built-environment properties within the proposed project area, was conducted by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Principal Architectural Historian. In order to identify and evaluate the subject properties as potential historical resources, a multi-step methodology was utilized. An inspection of the site and the existing structures, combined with a review of data for this parcel was performed to document existing conditions and assist in assessing and evaluating the property for significance. Photographs were taken of the structures, landscape, or other points of interest situated in the proposed project area, during the intensive-level survey. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 8 5.0 RESULTS 5.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH Nine cultural resources studies have been completed within ½ mile of the Project site. None are within the project boundary. Five are linear surveys and studies, four are cellular facility projects, and the remaining two are for small parcels. None resulted in the discovery of significant cultural resources within or near the Project site. Table 1: Cultural Resources Studies Within One-Half Mile of the Project Site Report Number Author/Year Type of Study OR-00814 Romani/1982 Survey, linear. PM 21.30/44.38; 0.00/6.85 OR-01658 Mason/1997 Survey; cellular facility OR-01898 Anon./1990 Finding of Effect report, linear. 2 resources OR-02752 Duke/2002 Survey; cellular facility OR-02847 Bonner/1999 Survey; cellular facility OR-03373 Arrington & Sikes/2006 Survey, linear; monitoring OR-03693 Bonner/2007 Survey; cellular facility OR-04196 Wlodarski/2012 Survey OR-04255 Billat/2012 Survey. 1 resource The SCCIC records search and literature review revealed that 21 cultural resources have been recorded within ½ mile of the Project site. None are within the project boundary; most are located along the Interstate (I) 5 freeway corridor. All 21 resources are historic-era buildings. Over half (11) are single family homes, six are commercial properties, two are industrial properties, and there is one religious building. None will be affected by the project. No indigenous tribal sites are recorded nearby. This may have been a function of the complete modern development of the area. Table 2: Cultural Resources Recorded Within One-Half Mile of the Project Site Site Number Recorder/Year (most recent) Description/OHP Attribute Code P-30-176593 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176594 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176595 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176596 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176597 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176598 Marsh/1987 Industrial property/HP08 P-30-176599 Marsh/1987 Industrial property/HP08 P-30-176600 Marsh/1987 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176601 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176602 Marsh/1987 Religious building/HP16 P-30-176603 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176604 Marsh/1987 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176605 Marsh/1987 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176606 Marsh/1987 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176607 Marsh/1987 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176608 Marsh/1987 Industrial property/HP08 P-30-176609 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 9 Site Number Recorder/Year (most recent) Description/OHP Attribute Code P-30-176611 Marsh/1987 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176612 Johnson Huemnan/1988 Commercial building/HP06 P-30-176613 Johnson Huemnan/1988 Single family property/HP02 P-30-176614 Johnson Huemnan/1988 Single family property/HP02 5.2 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH The NHMLAC literature revealed that no known vertebrate fossil localities lie directly within the Project site; however, the museum does have records of vertebrate fossil localities near the Project that occur in similar sedimentary deposits as those that occur on the Project site. Surficial sediments at the proposed project area site and in the surrounding vicinity consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the floodplain deposits from the Santa Ana River that currently flows to the east and possibly from Carbon Creek that currently flows just to the north. These deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, almost due east of the proposed project area on the west side of the Santa Ana River along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated a little farther east of the proposed project area east of the Santa Ana River along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8- 10 feet below the surface. (McLeod 2019). According to McLeod (2019), excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary Alluvium are unlikely to uncover significant fossils. Deeper excavations that extend down into older Quaternary deposits may encounter fossil vertebrates. Substantial, deeper excavations in the uppermost layers of the project area, therefore, should be monitored to identify and recover any significant fossil remains, and sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small- fossil potential of the site. 5.3 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION The NAHC provided the Sacred Lands File search results and contacts list on March 4, 2020. The result of the search was negative. Refer to Attachment C for the results and a tribal contacts list. 5.4 PEDESTRIAN SURVEY An architectural history pedestrian survey was conducted by Pamela Daly on September 14, 2018. The site was examined via a combination of pedestrian and windshield survey. An archaeological survey was not conducted nor recommended. No significant cultural resources were noted as a result of the survey. 5.5 BUILT ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION The National Register and California Register historical significance criteria were employed to evaluate the significance of the subject property. The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue and the buildings therein, home of the McCoy Ford dealership from 1965 to 2014, does not meet the U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 10 criteria for listing in the National Register or California Register as a historical resource. For purposes of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue is assigned California Historical Resource Status Code 6Z, to represent a property that has been found ineligible for listing in the National Register or California Register through survey evaluation (Daly 2019:24). Refer to Attachment D. 6.0 RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES 6.1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES No cultural resources were identified as a result of the records searches and the sacred lands file search, and because of the total development of the project site, the presence of cultural resources in the subsurface is unlikely. However, because of the relative proximity to the Santa Ana River floodplain, there remains the potential for buried resources to be present. Therefore, it is recommended that an archaeologist be on-call during project grading activities, prepared to examine and evaluate any discoveries. The following mitigation measure describes the recommended action: MM-1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified Archaeologist shall be retained to be on-call during grading activities in the event of a cultural resources discovery. The Archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference and shall establish, in cooperation with the lead agency, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work, if any is ongoing, to protect the find and permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the discovery when the Archaeologist is present. If archaeological resources are discovered, the Archaeologist shall be immediately informed and shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the lead agency, for exploration and/or salvage of the find. Significant sites that cannot be avoided may require data recovery measures and shall be completed upon approval of a Data Recovery Plan. 6.2 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Paleontological records search revealed that paleontologically sensitive older Quaternary alluvium lies at what could be relatively shallow depth below younger Quaternary Alluvium at the surface. Excavations into the deeper, finer-grained older Quaternary Alluvium may encounter significant vertebrate fossils. These deeper excavations; therefore, should be monitored by a qualified paleontologist to identify and recover any significant fossil remains. Sediment samples should be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. MM-2. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained to observe ground disturbing activities and recover fossil resources as necessary when construction activities will impact the older Quaternary Alluvium. The Paleontologist will attend the pre-grade conference and establish procedures and protocols for paleontological monitoring and to temporarily halt ground disturbing activities to permit sampling, evaluation, and recovery of any discovery. Substantial excavations below the uppermost layers (below 3 feet below surface) should be monitored. Sediment samples should also be recovered to determine the small-fossil potential of the site. If a discovery is determined to be significant, additional excavations and salvage of the fossil may be necessary to ensure that any impacts to it are mitigated to a less than significant level. Implementation of these mitigation measures would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 11 6.3 HISTORIC-ERA RESOURCES Because the 1600 West Lincoln Avenue property and the buildings therein, home of the McCoy Ford dealership from 1965 to 2014, have been determined not eligible for listing on the National Register and the California Register, no mitigation measures are necessary prior to the demolition of these buildings. 6.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENT RR-1. Project-related earth disturbance has the potential to unearth previously undiscovered human remains, resulting in a potentially significant impact. If human remains are encountered during excavation activities, all work shall halt and the County Coroner shall be notified (California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98). The Coroner will determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, s/he will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The NAHC shall be responsible for designating the most likely descendant (MLD), who will be responsible for the ultimate disposition of the remains, as required by Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The MLD shall make his/her recommendation within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD’s recommendation shall be followed if feasible, and may include scientific removal and non-destructive analysis of the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials (California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5). If the landowner rejects the MLD’s recommendations, the landowner shall rebury the remains with appropriate dignity on the property in a location that will not be subject to further subsurface disturbance (California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98). Compliance with Section 5097.9 of the California Public Resources Code would preclude significant impacts to human remains. 7.0 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this cultural resources report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. DATE: March 2020 SIGNED: ______________________________ Patrick O. Maxon, M.A., RPA Director – Cultural Services U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 12 8.0 REFERENCES Bean, Lowell John and Charles R. Smith 1978 Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, California, pp. 538-549. Robert F. Heizer, volume editor. Smithsonian Institution. Washington, D.C. Byrd, B. and M. Raab 2007 Prehistory if the Southern Bight: Models for a New Millennium. In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity (pp. 215–227). Terry Jones and Kathryn Klar, Editors. Altamira Press, a Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Chartkoff, J.L. and K.K. Chartkoff 1984 The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Jurupa Valley, City of 2017 Draft General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element. Koerper, H. C. 1981 Prehistoric Subsistence and Settlement in the Newport Bay Area and Environs, Orange County, California (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, Riverside. Koerper, H. C. and C. Drover 1983 Chronology Building for Coastal Orange County, The Case from CA-ORA-119-A. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 19(2):1–34. Kroeber, Alfred 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Washington, D.C. McCawley, W. 1996 The First Angelenos: The Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press/Ballena Press Cooperative Publication, Banning and Novato, California. McLeod, S. 2019 Vertebrate Paleontology Records Check for paleontological resources for the proposed 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Project, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, project area. Moratto, M. J. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, San Diego, California. Norris, R.M., and R.W. Webb 1976 Geology of California, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Santa Barbara. Office of Historic Preservation 1990 Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format. Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento, California. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 13 Wallace, W. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11: 214–230. Warren, C. N. 1968 Cultural Traditions and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States. Eastern New Mexico Contributions in Anthropology 1(3): 1–14. Weeks, K. and Grimmer, A. 1995 The Secretary of The Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties: With Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring & Reconstructing Historic Buildings. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resource Stewardship and Partnerships, Heritage Preservation Services (Washington, D.C.). Yerkes, R.F., McCulloh, T.H., Schoellhamer, J.E., and Vedder, J.G. 1965 Geology of the Los Angeles Basin California—an Introduction. U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 1 CONFIDENTIAL ATTACHMENT A CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH (SCCIC) South Central Coastal Information Center California State University, Fullerton Department of Anthropology MH-426 800 North State College Boulevard Fullerton, CA 92834-6846 657.278.5395 / FAX 657.278.5542 sccic@fullerton.edu C alifornia H istorical R esources I nformation S ystem Orange, Los Angeles, and Ventura Counties _____________________________________________________________________________ 2/18/2019 Records Search File No.: 19896.5895 Patrick Maxon VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Rd San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Re: Records Search Results for the 1600 W Lincoln Ave Project The South Central Coastal Information Center received your records search request for the project area referenced above, located on the Anaheim, CA USGS 7.5’ quadrangle. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and a ½-mile radius: As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☒ custom GIS maps ☐ shape files ☐ hand-drawn maps Resources within project area: 0 None Resources within ½-mile radius: 21 SEE ATTACHED MAP or LIST Resources listed in the OHP Historic Properties Directory within project area: 0 None Resources listed in the OHP Historic Properties Directory within ½-mile radius: 4 SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY STATUS CODES – resource locations from the OHP HPD may or may not be plotted on the custom GIS map or provided as a shape file Reports within project area: 0 None Reports within ½-mile radius: 9 SEE ATTACHED MAP or LIST Resource Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database (spreadsheet): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Report Copies: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed OHP Historic Properties Directory: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☐ not requested ☒ nothing listed Historical Maps: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Ethnographic Information: ☒ not available at SCCIC Historical Literature: ☒ not available at SCCIC GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: ☒ not available at SCCIC Caltrans Bridge Survey: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/historic.htm Shipwreck Inventory: ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://shipwrecks.slc.ca.gov/ShipwrecksDatabase/Shipwrecks_Database.asp Soil Survey Maps: (see below) ☒ not available at SCCIC; please go to http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above. The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission. Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts. Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Requests made after initial invoicing will result in the preparation of a separate invoice. Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System, Michelle Galaz Assistant Coordinator Enclosures: (X) Custom Maps – 2 pages (X) Resource Database Printout (list) – 2 pages (X) Resource Database Printout (details) – 21 pages (X) Report Database Printout (details) – 9 pages (X) OHP Historic Properties Directory – 1 page (X) National Register Status Codes – 1 page (X) Historical Maps – 4 pages OFFICE OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ** *Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for ORANGE County.Page 5 04-05-12 ROPERTY-NOMBER PRIMARY-ti STREETAOORESS NAMES CITY.HAME OWN YR-C OHP-PROG..PRO-REFERENCE-NUMBER STAT-OAT NRS CRIT 184604 11922 SANDY OR ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HU0101206B 12/20/10 6Y 070081 30-161876 23472 SANTA ANA CANYON RD ANAHEIM U 1920 HIST.RES.OOE-30-91-0011-0000 03/13/91 61 PROJ.REVW.FHWA91O214A 03/13/91 6Y 180241 SKYTOP CT SCE-SAN ONOFRE-SERNAN M38-T4:CA-O ANAHEIM P 1965 PROJ.REVW.FCC100527G 11/04/10 6Y 182868 415 SOUTH CITRON ANAHEIM P 1930 PROJ.REVW.HUO11OS16Q 06/09/11 6Y 147679 1924 SYCAMORE ST ANAHEIM P HIST.RES.DOE-30-03-0017-0000 12/22/03 6Y PROJ.REVW.FCC031006C 12/22/03 61 147681 1930 SYCAMORE ST ANAHEIM P HIST.RES.OOE-30-03-0019-0000 12/22/03 6Y PROJ.REVW.FCCO31006C 12/22/03 61 147680 1940 SYCAMORE ST ANAHEIM P HIST.RES.DOE-30-03-0018-0000 12/22/03 6Y PROJ.REVW.FCCO31006C 12/22/03 6Y 179889 8932 SYRACUSE AVE ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.H0O100902J 09/08/10 6Y 186964 3115 W A.LISO PL ANAHEIM P 1961 PROJ.REVW.HOD111O21O 10/24/11 6Y 065849 30-161817 2424 W BALL RD MORRIS PLAN ANAHEIM P HIST.RES.DOE-30-89-000l-0000 05/31/89 61 PROJ.REVW.FOIC89OS11A 05/31/99 61 183824 2719 W BALL RD ANAHEIM P 1959 PROJ.REVW.FCC100SO3D 05/28/10 6Y 182954 1651 W BEACON AVE ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUO11O62OF 06/29/11 61 182819 1913 W BEACON AVE ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUD11OSO9D 05/09/11 6Y 187264 1654 W BRANDE AVE ANAHEIM P 1956 PROJ.REVW.HUD12O2O6H 02/10/12 61 PROJ.REVW.HUD12O2O6H 02/10/12 61 041193 30-161785 221 W BROADWAY GERMAN METHODIST CHURCH,CHURCH DI ANAHEIM P 1900 HIST.SURV.2803-0010-0015 04/22/78 30 041194 30-161786 325 W BROADWAY CHURCH OF THE HOLY PRESENCE ANAHEIM P 1924 HIST.SURV.2603-0010-0016 04/22/78 30 185018 2448 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUD11OBO1J 08/29/li 6Y 139211 1129 W CENTER ST FRED GRIMM HOUSE ANAHEIM P 1925 HIST.RES.OOE-30-03-0005-0000 04/30/03 6Y PROJ.REVW.HUDO3O317E 04/30/03 6Y 173610 1219 W CENTER ST ANAHEIM P 1924 PROJ.REVW.HUDOB1003P 10/31/08 61 173657 1225 W CENTER ST ANAHEIM P 1911 PROJ.REVW.HUDO81003O 10/31/08 6Y 066969 30-161839 1593 M CERRITOS AVE BLDG REHABILITATION ANAHEIM U PROJ.REVW.HUDB9102SA 11/27/89 6Y 187009 1596 W CHATEAU AVE ANAHEIM P 1958 PROJ.REVW.HUD111212B 12/21/11 6Y 187618 1331 W CHEVY CHASE DR ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUD120119A 02/10/12 61 182274 2309 W CLOVER AVE ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUD1104251 04/27/il 6Y 185916 1820 W GRANERCY ANAHEIM P 1960 PROJ.REVW.HUD1002O4L 02/03/10 61 182293 1818 W GRAMERCY ST ANAHEIM P 1969 PROJ.REVW.MUD11O418R 04/20/li 6Y 187282 2471 W GREENBRIER ANAHEIM P 1956 PROJ.REVW.HUD12O2O6G 02/10/12 6Y 187263 2471 W GREENBRIER AVE ANAHEIM P 1956 PROJ.REVW.HUD12O2O6G 02/10/12 61 183186 2122 W NARLE AVE ANAHEIM P 1954 PROJ.REVW.1-JUD1106O6A 06/30/li 6Y 041185 30-161777 124 W LINCOLN AVE CASSDU BUILDING/FAIRYLAND THEATER,ANAHEIM P 1917 HIST.SURV.2803-0010-0007 04/22/78 3D 041187 30-161779 200 W LINCOLN AVE CALIFORNIA THEATER BLOCK,FOX THEA ANAHEIM P 1921 MIST.SURV.2803-0010-0009 04/22/78 65 041180 30-161773 212 W LINCOLN AVE S Q R STORE ANAHEIM P 1925 HIST.SURV.2803-0010-0002 04/22/78 3D 041181 30-161774 301 W LINCOLN AVE ROSE MARIE APARTMENTS SITE ANAHEIM P 1924 MIST.SURV.2803-0010-0003 01/01/78 6Z 041179 30-161772 323 W LINCOLN AVE KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS LODGE SITE ANAHEIM P 1924 HIST.SURV.2803-0010-0001 01/01/78 65 139210 1100 W LINCOLN AVE FIVE POINTS BUILDING ANAHEIM N 1922 HIST.RES.DOE-30-03-0004-0000 04/30/03 6Y PROJ.REVW.HUDO3O317D 04/30/03 61 185340 2903 W LYNROSE DR ANAHEIM P 1955 PROJ.REVW.HUD11O919B 09/19/11 6Y 182869 2441 W MALL AVE ANAHEIM P 1957 PROJ.REVW.HUD11O6O9K 06/24/11 61 147212 1592 W DRANGEMOOD AVE ANAHEIM P 1963 HIST.RES.DOE-30-04-0003-0000 04/21/04 61 PROJ.REVW.HUDO4O33OB 04/21/04 6Y 182314 2120 W PACIFIC AVE ANAHEIM P 1954 PROJ.REVW.HUD11O428H 05/03/11 61 185333 1016 W PIONEER DR ANAHEIM P 1961 PROJ.REVW.HUD11O922A 09/22/11 6Y 155837 1280 W SAHTA ANA ST ANAHEIM P 1920 PROJ.REVW.HUDOBO12BE 02/19/06 6Y PRGJ.REVW.HUDOSOB24D 10/03/05 61 041102 30-161715 2200 W SEQUOIA AVE PHILIP ACKLEY STANTON HOUSE,NORRA ANAHEIM P 1926 HIST.RES.NPS-80000B2B-0000 11/21/80 iS 162313 211 W SIMMONS AVE ANAHEIM P 1956 PROJ.REVW.HUD11O42SR 04/29/il 6Y 130243 311 W SOUTH ST ST MICHAEL’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH ANAHEIM P 1676 HIST.RES.MPS-04000017-0000 02/11/04 iS C NATREG.30-0065 03/12/02 3S C Report Detail: OR-00814 Citation information Year:1982 Title:ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT for the Route I-5 Santa Ana Transportation Corridor, Route 405 in Orange County to Route 605 in Los Angeles County Pm 21.30/44.38; 0.00/6.85 Affliliation:Caltrans No. pages:26 Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified:9/12/2017 ikott IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections:No Disclosure:Not for publication Record status:Database Complete Location information Author(s):Romani, John F. Attributes:Archaeological, Field study County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM, EL TORO, LOS ALAMITOS, ORANGE, TUSTIN Inventory size:QC No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-00814 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 1/21/2015 agarcia GIS QC Extends into another county as LA-03356 Page 1 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:57 PM Report Detail: OR-01658 Citation information Year:1997 Title:Cultural Resources Records Search and Literature Review Report for a Pacific Bell Mobile Services Telecommunications Facility: Cm 021-13, in the City of Anaheim, Ca. Affliliation:Chambers Group, Inc. No. pages:4 Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified:10/18/201 mgalaz IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Mason, Roger D. Attributes:Archaeological, Field study County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size: No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-01658 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. Page 2 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:57 PM Report Detail: OR-01898 Citation information Year:1990 Title:Finding of Effect Widening of Interstate 5 and Reconstruction of Interchanges Between State Routes 22/57 and 91 in the Cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Fullerton and Buena Park Affliliation:Caltrans No. pages:26 Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified:1/22/2015 agarcia IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Anonymous Attributes:Other research County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM, ORANGE Inventory size:QC No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-01898 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:2 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 1/22/2015 agarcia GIS QC Primary No.Trinomial Name P-30-161815 Melrose Abbey Mausoleum P-30-161816 Anaheim Public Utility District Page 3 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:58 PM Report Detail: OR-02752 Citation information Year:2002 Title:Cultural Resource Assessment at & T Wireless Services Facility No. 13226a Orange County, California Affliliation:LSA Associates, Inc. No. pages: Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified: IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Duke, Curt Attributes:Literature search County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size:.25 ac No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-02752 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. Page 4 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:58 PM Report Detail: OR-02847 Citation information Year:1999 Title:Records Search for Attws Site Number R138.1, 105 S. Manchester Avenue, Anaheim; Anaheim Quadrangle Affliliation:W.H. Bonner Associates No. pages: Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified: IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Bonner, Wayne H. Attributes:Literature search County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size:.25 ac No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-02847 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. Page 5 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:58 PM Report Detail: OR-03373 Citation information Year:2006 Title:Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network Construction Project State of California: Volumes I and Ii Affliliation:SWCA Environmental Consultants, Inc. No. pages:652 Database record metadata Entered:5/5/2008 jay Last modified:12/22/201 agarcia IC actions: Associated resources General notes Same as LA8255, VN2504 - QC for Orange County section 12/22/14 Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Arrington, Cindy and Nancy Sikes Attributes:Archaeological, Field study, Monitoring, Other research County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM, BLACK MTN, BURBANK, CAMARILLO, CANOGA PARK, DANA POINT, EL TORO, FRAZIER MOUNTAIN, HOLLYWOOD, INGLEWOOD, LEBEC, LIEBRE MTN, LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS, LOS ANGELES, MOORPARK, NEWHALL, NEWPORT BEACH, OAT MOUNTAIN, ORANGE, OXNARD, PITAS POINT, SAN CLEMENTE, SAN FERNANDO, SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, SANTA SUSANA, SATICOY, SIMI, SOUTH GATE, TUSTIN, VAN NUYS, VENICE, VENTURA, WARM SPRINGS MOUNTAIN, WHITAKER PEAK, WHITE LEDGE PEAK, WHITTIER Inventory size:QC No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-03373 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 5/6/2008 jay Appended records from old Surveys database. 12/22/201 agarcia GIS QC Page 6 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:58 PM Report Detail: OR-03693 Citation information Year:2007 Title:Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for T-Mobile Candidate LA02893H (MAG Wheels),528 West Central Park South, Anaheim, Orange County, California Affliliation:Michael Brandman Associates No. pages:13 Database record metadata Entered:9/3/2008 Last modified: IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Bonner, Wayne H. Attributes:Archaeological, Field study County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size: No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-03693 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Date User Action taken 9/3/2008 jay Appended records from Biblio database (second round of additions) Page 7 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:58 PM Report Detail: OR-04196 Citation information Year:2012 Title:LAR138 -- Manchester/Broadway, 1500 West Center Street Anaheim, CA 92802 Affliliation:ATC No. pages:42 Database record metadata Entered:8/20/2012 lnoyes Last modified:8/20/2012 lnoyes IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Wlodarski, Robert Attributes:Archaeological, Field study County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size: No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-04196 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:0 PLSS: Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1500 West Center St Anaheim, CA Page 8 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:59 PM Report Detail: OR-04255 Citation information Year:2012 Title:All Aboard Storage 155 S Adams Street, Anaheim, Orange County Affliliation:EarthTouch No. pages:45 Database record metadata Entered:3/7/2013 lnoyes Last modified:3/7/2013 lnoyes IC actions: Associated resources General notes Date User Address: Collections: Disclosure: Record status: Location information Author(s):Billat, Lorna Attributes:Archaeological, Field study County(ies):Orange USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Inventory size: No. maps: Identifiers Report No.:OR-04255 Other IDs: Cross-refs: Has informals: No. resources:1 PLSS: Primary No.Trinomial Name P-30-176614 1721 W Lincoln Ave Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 155 S Adams St Anaheim, CA Page 9 of 9 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:04:59 PM OR-02752 OR-03693OR-04255 OR-02847 OR-04196 OR-03373 OR-01658 OR-01898 OR-00814 May depict confidential cultural resource locations. Do not distribute. 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles-Anaheim, CAUSGS 7.5' PR: 1981 1:24,000SCCIC #19896FEB 2019 Reports within project area: None9 reports within 1/2-mile radius South Central Coastal Information Center Resource Detail: P-30-176593 P-30-176593 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Frasier HouseName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Frasier House Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 201 S Walnut Anaheim 36-031-25 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 1 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176594 P-30-176594 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 123 S CherryName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 123 S Cherry Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 123 S Cherry Anaheim 36-032-24 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 2 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176595 P-30-176595 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 119 S CherryName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 119 S Cherry Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 119 S Cherry Anaheim 36-032-17 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 3 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176596 P-30-176596 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 117 S CherryName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 117 S Cherry Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 117 S Cherry Anaheim 36-032-16 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 4 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176597 P-30-176597 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 1310 W CenterName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 1310 W Center Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1310 W Center Anaheim 36-032-29 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 5 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176598 P-30-176598 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Anaheim Spray Chemical CoName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP08 (Industrial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Anaheim Spray Chemical Co Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 275 N Manchester Anaheim 34-07-31 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 6 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176599 P-30-176599 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Pump & Agricultural Supplies IncName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP08 (Industrial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Pump & Agricultural Supplies Inc Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 303 N Manchester Anaheim 34-070-30 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 7 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176600 P-30-176600 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Doll's HutName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Doll's Hut Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 107 S Manchester Anaheim 250-135-03 92805 107 Adams Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 8 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176601 P-30-176601 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 217 S WalnutName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 217 S Walnut Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 217 S Walnut Anaheim 36-031-23 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 9 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:21 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176602 P-30-176602 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Anaheim Foursquare ChurchName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP16 (Religious building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Anaheim Foursquare Church Other Pentacostal Foursquare Church Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1310 W Broadway Anaheim 250-131-3 92805 250-131-4 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 10 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176603 P-30-176603 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Malmstrom HouseName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Malmstrom House Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 206 S Thalia Anaheim 250-131-5 92805 250-131-6 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 11 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176604 P-30-176604 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Anaheim Scale CoName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Anaheim Scale Co Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code Corner of Thalia and Manchester Anaheim 250-132-04 92805 200 S Manchester Ave Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 12 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176605 P-30-176605 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Anaheim WineryName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Anaheim Winery Other Boege Winery Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 127 S Manchester Anaheim 250-136-2 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 13 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176606 P-30-176606 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Klein Construction CoName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Klein Construction Co Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 201 S Thalia Anaheim 250-131-02 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 14 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176607 P-30-176607 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Lincoln Ave Service StationName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Lincoln Ave Service Station Other Patio Fireside Shop Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1312 W Lincoln Anaheim 36-04-38 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 15 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176608 P-30-176608 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted Anaheim Cooperative Orange AssnName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP08 (Industrial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name Anaheim Cooperative Orange Assn Other Moonigs Floor Coverings Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1544 W Lincoln Anaheim 250-122-07 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 16 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176609 P-30-176609 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 219 N EuclidName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 219 N Euclid Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 219 N Euclid Anaheim 072-100-7 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 17 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176611 P-30-176611 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 223 N EuclidName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 223 N Euclid Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes D. Marsh LSA Associates, Inc12/1/1987 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 223 N Euclid Anaheim 072-100-6 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 18 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176612 P-30-176612 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 1717 W LincolnName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP06 (1-3 story commercial building)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 1717 W Lincoln Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes Johnson Huemnan LSA Associates, Inc4/29/1988 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1717 W Lincoln Anaheim 072-100-41 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 19 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176613 P-30-176613 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 1735 W LincolnName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 1735 W Lincoln Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes Johnson Huemnan LSA Associates, Inc4/29/1988 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. 2006 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for Modeo Candidate 501004a (crescent Way), 301 North Crescent Way, Anaheim, Orange County, California OR-03427 Michael Brandman Associates Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1735 W Lincoln Anaheim 072-100-42 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 20 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:22 PM Resource Detail: P-30-176614 P-30-176614 Identifying information Primary No.: Trinomial: Attributes General notes Other IDs: Recording events Associated reports Location information County:Orange Address: Database record metadata Entered:5/1/2008 jay Last modified:3/12/2014 mgalaz IC actions: Date User Collections: Management status Cross-refs: Disclosure:Unrestricted 1721 W Lincoln AveName: Resource type: Age: Information base: Accession no(s): Facility: PLSS: UTMs: Record status: Building Historic Survey HP02 (Single family property)Attribute codes: USGS quad(s):ANAHEIM Type Name Resource Name 1721 W Lincoln Ave Date Recorder(s)Affiliation Notes Johnson Huemnan LSA Associates, Inc4/29/1988 Report No.Year Title Affiliation 1987 Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-00980 LSA Associates, Inc. 1987 (Duplicate of OR980) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 Pm 34.0 to 42.1 Pm OR-01961 LSA Associates, Inc. 2006 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for Modeo Candidate 501004a (crescent Way), 301 North Crescent Way, Anaheim, Orange County, California OR-03427 Michael Brandman Associates 2012 All Aboard Storage 155 S Adams Street, Anaheim, Orange County OR-04255 EarthTouch Address City Assessor's parcel no.Zip code 1721 W Lincoln Ave Anaheim 072-100-33 92805 Date User Action taken 5/1/2008 jay Appended records from Encodent database. Page 21 of 21 SCCIC 2/18/2019 5:05:23 PM P-30-176604 P-30-176613P-30-176614 P-30-176608 P-30-176607 P-30-176605P-30-176600 P-30-176594P-30-176595P-30-176596P-30-176597 P-30-176593P-30-176612 P-30-176603P-30-176606 P-30-176601 P-30-176602 P-30-176599 P-30-176609P-30-176611 P-30-176598 May depict confidential cultural resource locations. Do not distribute. 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles-Anaheim, CAUSGS 7.5' PR: 1981 1:24,000SCCIC #19896FEB 2019 Resources within project area: None21 resource within 1/2-mile radius South Central Coastal Information Center U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 2 ATTACHMENT B PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH (NHMLAC) Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 24 January 2019 VCS Environmental 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attn: Patrick O. Maxon, Director, Cultural Services re: Vertebrate Paleontology Records Check for paleontological resources for the proposed 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Project, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, project area Dear Patrick: I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Project, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, project area as outlined on the portion of the Anaheim USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 10 January 2019. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie directly within the proposed project area boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from deposits similar to those that occur in the proposed project area, either at the surface or at depth. Surficial sediments at the proposed project area site and in the surrounding vicinity consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the floodplain deposits from the Santa Ana River that currently flows to the east and possibly from Carbon Creek that currently flows just to the north. These deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils, at least in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, almost due east of the proposed project area on the west side of the Santa Ana River along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated a little farther east of the proposed project area east of the Santa Ana River along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8-10 feet below the surface. Surface grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary Alluvium in the proposed project area are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations in the proposed project area, however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils in older Quaternary deposits. Any substantial excavations in the proposed project area below the uppermost layers, therefore, should be closely monitored to quickly and professionally collect any specimens without impeding development. Also, sediment samples should be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project area. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 3 ATTACHMENT C SACRED LANDS FILE SEARCH AND CONTACTS LIST (NAHC) STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION Page 1 of 2 March 4, 2020 Patrick O. Maxon City of Anaheim Via Email to: PMaxon@vcsenvironmental.com Re: Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3, 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Orange County Dear Mr. Maxon: Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above-listed project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) (“Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.”) Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides: Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section. The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe’s areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources. The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as: 1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to: CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Luiseño VICE CHAIRPERSON Reginald Pagaling Chumash SECRETARY Merri Lopez-Keifer Luiseño PARLIAMENTARIAN Russell Attebery Karuk COMMISSIONER Marshall McKay Wintun COMMISSIONER William Mungary Paiute/White Mountain Apache COMMISSIONER Joseph Myers Pomo COMMISSIONER Julie Tumamait- Stenslie Chumash COMMISSIONER [Vacant] EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Christina Snider Pomo NAHC HEADQUARTERS 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 373-3710 nahc@nahc.ca.gov NAHC.ca.gov Page 2 of 2 • A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites; • Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response; • Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and • If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including: • Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10. 3. The result of any Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was negative. 4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and 5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE. Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current. If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address: Andrew.Green@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, Andrew Green Cultural Resources Analyst Attachment Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Jeff Grubbe, Chairperson 5401 Dinah Shore Drive Palm Springs, CA, 92264 Phone: (760) 699 - 6800 Fax: (760) 699-6919 Cahuilla Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina, CA, 91723 Phone: (626) 926 - 4131 admin@gabrielenoindians.org Gabrieleno Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Anthony Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 San Gabriel, CA, 91778 Phone: (626) 483 - 3564 Fax: (626) 286-1262 GTTribalcouncil@aol.com Gabrieleno Gabrielino /Tongva Nation Sandonne Goad, Chairperson 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 Los Angeles, CA, 90012 Phone: (951) 807 - 0479 sgoad@gabrielino-tongva.com Gabrielino Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council Robert Dorame, Chairperson P.O. Box 490 Bellflower, CA, 90707 Phone: (562) 761 - 6417 Fax: (562) 761-6417 gtongva@gmail.com Gabrielino Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe Charles Alvarez, 23454 Vanowen Street West Hills, CA, 91307 Phone: (310) 403 - 6048 roadkingcharles@aol.com Gabrielino Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Sonia Johnston, Chairperson P.O. Box 25628 Santa Ana, CA, 92799 sonia.johnston@sbcglobal.net Juaneno Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation - Belardes Matias Belardes, Chairperson 32161 Avenida Los Amigos San Juan Capisttrano, CA, 92675 Phone: (949) 293 - 8522 kaamalam@gmail.com Juaneno Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation - Romero Teresa Romero, Chairperson 31411-A La Matanza Street San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675 Phone: (949) 488 - 3484 Fax: (949) 488-3294 tromero@juaneno.com Juaneno Juaneno Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation - Romero Heidi Lucero, Cultural Resources Director 31411-A La Matanza Street San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675 Phone: (949) 488 - 3484 sos@juaneno.com Juaneno La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians Fred Nelson, Chairperson 22000 Highway 76 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760) 742 - 3771 Luiseno 1 of 2 This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Orange County. PROJ-2019- 005005 03/04/2020 10:56 AM Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Orange County 3/4/2020 Pala Band of Mission Indians Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula Rd. Pala, CA, 92059 Phone: (760) 891 - 3515 Fax: (760) 742-3189 sgaughen@palatribe.com Cupeno Luiseno Pauma Band of Luiseno Indians Temet Aguilar, Chairperson P.O. Box 369 Pauma Valley, CA, 92061 Phone: (760) 742 - 1289 Fax: (760) 742-3422 bennaecalac@aol.com Luiseno Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Mark Macarro, Chairperson P.O. Box 1477 Temecula, CA, 92593 Phone: (951) 770 - 6000 Fax: (951) 695-1778 epreston@pechanga-nsn.gov Luiseno Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer One Government Center Lane Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760) 297 - 2635 crd@rincon-nsn.gov Luiseno Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson One Government Center Lane Valley Center, CA, 92082 Phone: (760) 749 - 1051 Fax: (760) 749-5144 bomazzetti@aol.com Luiseno San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians San Luis Rey, Tribal Council 1889 Sunset Drive Vista, CA, 92081 Phone: (760) 724 - 8505 Fax: (760) 724-2172 cjmojado@slrmissionindians.org Luiseno Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Scott Cozart, Chairperson P. O. Box 487 San Jacinto, CA, 92583 Phone: (951) 654 - 2765 Fax: (951) 654-4198 jontiveros@soboba-nsn.gov Cahuilla Luiseno 2 of 2 This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Apartments Project, Orange County. PROJ-2019- 005005 03/04/2020 10:56 AM Native American Heritage Commission Tribal Consultation List Orange County 3/4/2020 U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 4 ATTACHMENT D HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION REPORT (DALY 2019) FINAL HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION REPORT for 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Assessor Parcel Numbers: 250-091-009; 250-091-010; 250-091-011 Anaheim, Orange County, CA Prepared for: VCS Environmental, Inc. 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. Daly & Associates 2242 El Capitan Drive Riverside, CA 92506 April 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 B. Background Information ...................................................................................................... 1 C. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 1 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 6 A. Federal Level ........................................................................................................................ 6 1. National Register of Historic Places .................................................................................... 6 B. State Level ............................................................................................................................ 8 1. California Register of Historical Resources .......................................................................... 9 2. California Office of Historical Preservation Survey Methodology ..................................... 10 III. EVALUATION ............................................................................................................................ 12 A. Historic Context ................................................................................................................. 12 1. Anaheim ............................................................................................................................. 12 2. Post World War II (1945 to 1965) ...................................................................................... 12 3. McCoy Ford ........................................................................................................................ 12 B. Historic Resources Identified ............................................................................................. 17 C. Significance ........................................................................................................................ 22 IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................... 25 V. INVENTORY SITE FORMS (DPR SERIES 523) .............................................................................. 26 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This assessment report documents and evaluates the federal and state significance, and eligibility of the automotive-related commercial property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, within the boundary of the City of Anaheim (City), in Orange County, California (Figures 1, 2, and 3). The property is comprised of three legal parcels with the Orange County Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) of 250-091-009, 250-091-010, and 250-091-011. The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue has upon it built-environment resources that are of sufficient age for them to be recorded on Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series Site Recording Forms and evaluated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and/or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). Our report includes a discussion of the survey methodology used, a brief historic context of the property and surrounding area, and the identification and formal evaluation of the subject property for historical significance. B. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The current study of the three parcels, identified as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, within the Project boundary was conducted using data from historic aerial photographs and original architectural drawings for the buildings and structures constructed on the property in 1965. As the built-environment resources on the property have achieved a sufficient age (generally over 50 year old for buildings, structures, features, objects, or man-made landscapes, under the California Environmental Quality Act), the properties were investigated under the auspices of a qualified architectural historian to evaluate the eligibility of listing the buildings and structures that comprised McCoy Ford from 1966 to 2014 as historical resources in the National Register or California Register. C. METHODOLOGY This historic resource assessment, and evaluation of the built-environment properties within the proposed project area, was conducted by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Principal Architectural Historian. Ms. Daly holds a Master of Science Degree in Historic Preservation from the University of Vermont, and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Management (with a minor in History). In order to identify and evaluate the subject properties as potential historical resources, a multi-step methodology was utilized. An inspection of the site and the existing structures, 2 3 4 5 combined with a review of data for this parcel, was performed to document existing conditions and assist in assessing and evaluating the property for significance. Photographs were taken of the structures, landscape, or other points of interest situated in the proposed project area, during the intensive-level survey. The National Register and California Register historical significance criteria were employed to evaluate the significance of the subject property. In addition, the following tasks were performed for the study: • The National Register and California Register property inventories were searched. • Site-specific research was conducted on the subject property utilizing historic topographic and road maps, Orange County/Anaheim City Directories, newspaper articles and advertisement from the Los Angeles Times, historic photographs, and other published sources. • Background research of prior land owners was performed at local and regional historic archives, and through internet resources such as available from Ancestry.com and GenealogyBank.com. • Ordinances, statutes, regulations, bulletins, and technical materials relating to federal, state, and local historic preservation, designation assessment processes, and related programs were reviewed and analyzed. 6 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Historic resources fall within the jurisdiction of several levels of government. Federal laws provide the framework for the identification, and in certain instances, protection of historic resources. Additionally, states and local jurisdictions play active roles in the identification, documentation, and protection of such resources within their communities. The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, particularly Section 106 of the NHPA, and CEQA are the primary laws and regulations governing the evaluation and significance of historic resources of national, state, regional, and local importance. A description of these relevant laws and regulations is presented below. In analyzing the historic significance of the subject property, criteria for designation under federal, state, and local landmark programs were considered. Additionally, the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) survey methodology was used to survey and rate the relative significance of the subject property. A. FEDERAL LEVEL 1. National Register of Historic Places First authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935, the National Register was established by the NHPA as “an authoritative guide to be used by Federal, State, and local governments, private groups and citizens to identify the Nation’s cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment.”1 The National Register recognizes properties that are significant at the national, state and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the National Register, the quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture must be in a district, site, building, structure, or object that possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, and:2 A. is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 1 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 36 § 60.2. 2 Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms, National Register Bulletin 16, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, September 30, 1986 (“National Register Bulletin 16”). This bulletin contains technical information on comprehensive planning, survey of cultural resources, and registration in the National Register of Historic Places. 7 D. yields, or may be likely to yield, information important to prehistory or history. A property eligible for listing in the National Register must meet one or more of the four criteria (A-D) defined above. In addition, unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it must be at least 50 years old to be eligible for National Register listing. In addition to meeting the criteria of significance, a property must have integrity. “Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance.”3 According to National Register Bulletin 15, within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognize seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of these seven aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance.4 The seven factors that define integrity are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The following is excerpted from National Register Bulletin 15, which provides guidance on the interpretation and application of these factors. • Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.5 • Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of the property.6 • Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.7 • Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.8 • Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.9 • Feeling is property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.10 3 National Register Bulletin 15, page 44. 4 Ibid. 5 “The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the property was created or why something happened. The actual location of a historic property, complemented by its setting is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Except in rare cases, the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved.” Ibid. 6 “A property’s design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes such considerations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces; pattern of fenestration; textures and colors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing; and arrangement and type of plantings in a designed landscape.” Ibid. 7 National Register Bulletin 15, page 45. 8 “The choice and combination of materials reveals the preferences of those who created the property and indicated the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. Indigenous materials are often the focus of regional building traditions and thereby help define an area’s sense of time and place.” Ibid. 9 “Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or to its individual components. It can be expressed in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations and ornamental detailing. In can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques.” Ibid. 8 • Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.11 In assessing a property’s integrity, the National Register criteria recognize that properties change over time; therefore, it is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. The property must, however, retain the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity.12 For properties that are considered significant under National Register criteria A and B, National Register Bulletin 15 states that a property that is significant for its historic association is eligible if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance during the period of its association with the important event, historical pattern, or person(s).13 In assessing the integrity of properties that are considered significant under National Register criterion C, National Register Bulletin 15 provides that a property important for illustrating a particular architectural style or construction technique must retain most of the physical features that constitute that style or technique.14 The primary effects of listing in the National Register on private property owners of historic buildings is the availability of financial and tax incentives.15 In addition, for projects that receive federal funding, the NHPA Section 106 clearance process (published at 36 CFR Part 800) must be completed. State and local laws and regulations may apply to properties listed in the National Register. For example, demolition or inappropriate alteration of National Register eligible or listed properties may be subject to CEQA. B. STATE LEVEL The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), as an office of the California Department of Parks and Recreation, implements the policies of the NHPA on a statewide level. The OHP also carries out the duties as set forth in the Public Resources Code (PRC) and maintains the California Historical Resources Inventory. The State Historic Preservation Officer 10 “It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property’s historic character.” Ibid. 11 “A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to the observer. Like feeling, associations require the presence of physical features that convey a property’s historic character…Because feeling and association depend on individual perceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the National Register.” Ibid. 12 National Register Bulletin 15, page 46. 13 Ibid. 14 “A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, patter of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basic features conveying massing but has lost the majority of features that once characterized its style.” Ibid. 15 See 36 CFR 60.2(b) (c). 9 (SHPO) is an appointed official who implements historic preservation programs within the state’s jurisdictions. 1. California Register of Historical Resources Created by Assembly Bill 2881, which was signed into law on September 27, 1992, the California Register is “an authoritative listing and guide to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens in identifying the existing historical resources of the state and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change.”16 The criteria for eligibility for the California Register are based upon National Register criteria.17 Certain resources are determined by the statute to be automatically included in the California Register, including California properties formally determined eligible for, or listed in, the National Register.18 The California Register consists of resources that are listed automatically and those that must be nominated through an application and public hearing process. The California Register automatically includes the following: • California properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and those formally determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places; • California Registered Historical Landmarks from No. 770 onward; • Those California Points of Historical Interest that have been evaluated by the OHP and have been recommended to the State Historical Resources Commission for inclusion in the California Register.19 Other resources which may be nominated to the California Register include: • Individual historical resources; • Historical resources contributing to historic districts; • Historical resources identified as significant in historical resources surveys with significance ratings of Category 1 through 5; • Historical resources designated or listed as local landmarks, or designated under any local ordinance, such as a historic preservation overlay zone.20 To be eligible for the California Register, a historic resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria: 16 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(a). 17 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(b). 18 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(d). 19 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(d). 20 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(e). 10 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Additionally, a historic resource eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one or more of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of its historic character or appearance to be recognizable as a historic resource and to convey the reasons for its significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing.21 Integrity under the California Register is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The resource must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which it is proposed for eligibility. It is possible that a historic resource may not retain sufficient integrity to meet criteria for listing in the National Register, but it may still be eligible for listing in the California Register.22 2. California Office of Historical Preservation Survey Methodology The evaluation instructions and classification system prescribed by the California OHP in its Instructions for Recording Historical Resources provide a three-digit evaluation rating code for use in classifying potential historical resources. The first digit indicates one of the following general seven evaluation categories for use in conducting cultural resources surveys: 1. Listed in the National Register or the California Register; 2. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register or the California Register; 3. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through survey evaluation; 4. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through other evaluation; 5. Recognized as Historically Significant by Local Government; 6. Not eligible for any Listing or Designation; and 7. Not evaluated for the National Register or California Register or needs re-evaluation. The second digit of the evaluation status code is a letter code indicating whether the resource is separately eligible (S), eligible as part of a district (D), or both (B). The third digit is a number that is used to further specify significance and refine the relationship of the property to 21 California Code of Regulations, California Register of Historical Resources (Title 14, Chapter11.5), Section 4852(c). 22 Ibid. 11 the National Register and/or California Register. Under this evaluation system, categories 1 through 4 pertain to various levels of National Register eligibility. The California Register, however, may include surveyed resources with evaluation rating codes through level 5. In addition, properties found ineligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, or for designation under a local ordinance are given an evaluation status code of 6. 12 III. EVALUATION A. HISTORIC CONTEXT 1. Anaheim The community of Anaheim began as a settlement of German farmers and grape growers who came to the area in the mid-1800s. The town of Anaheim was built on a parcel of 200 acres surveyed by George Hanson, one of the colonies founding members. The town activities were primarily associated with the growing of orange and lemons trees after it was found that these crops thrived in the southern California soil and weather. The population of the town grew steadily over the years with 1,456 residents in 1900, to 2,658 residents in 1910.23 This jump of almost 85% every ten years held until the influx of new residents after the close of World War II. 2. Post World War II (1945 to 1965) In 1950, the population of Anaheim had risen to 14,556 residents. The city was still mostly agriculturally based, with citrus ranches and groves covering the majority of the land outside of the city center. Then, in the early 1950’s, Walt Disney decided to construct his new amusement park in Anaheim. Construction of the Disneyland was announced in 1954.24 Anaheim not only drew thousands of new residents to staff the park, but simultaneously, the area also became a “bedroom” community for employees of the aeronautic and manufacturing industries in Long Beach, Wilmington, Torrance, and El Segundo. By 1960, the population of Anaheim had grown over 600% to 104,184 residents. New houses were being built in the thousands within housing tracts to create homes for the families moving into the area. To meet the shopping needs of Orange County residents, strip malls, department stores, restaurants, and automobile dealerships were popping up along all the major roadways, and near freeway exits. 3. McCoy Ford The 1924 Voter Registration Roll for Los Angeles County notes that 21-year-old Elton Revelon “Bus” McCoy, and 22-year-old William Arlee Mills were operating an “oil station business” that year, and were rooming together at 3811 West Washington Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.25 That was the same year that W. Arlee Mills’ sister, Adalene M. Mills married Elton R. McCoy, thereby making the two friends brothers-in-law as well. By 1928, the Los Angeles County voter registration information for McCoy and Mills had been updated to 23 U.S. Census Records for Anaheim, CA. 24 “History of Anaheim: The 1950s-1960s”. https://www.anaheim.net/156/The-1950s---1980s 25 Los Angeles County Voter Registration Roll, 1924 for “Elton R. McCoy” and “William A. Mills”. Accessed by Ancestry.com 13 state that both McCoy and Mills were now the proprietors/owners of the gas station business in the City of Los Angeles.26 Mills was also married by 1930, and the United States Census of 1930 recorded that Mills had moved to Fullerton, and was a “Ford Dealer”, while McCoy was still living in Los Angeles, and was running a “Service Station”.27 Within just a year, the Orange County City Directory of 1931 noted that McCoy and Mills had established the McCoy & Mills Ford Tire & Tractor Company at 125 Commonwealth Avenue in Fullerton, and both families were living in Fullerton as well.28/29 As they were in the business of selling and repairing the most popular and plentiful Ford brand of automobile in the Unites States, the men appeared to be weathering the effects of the Great Depression, and had been able to purchase homes in Fullerton. At the end of the decade, the Mills and McCoy had expanded their businesses to have the McCoy Ford Car and Tractor dealership at 320 North Anaheim Boulevard, in Anaheim, and the McCoy & Mills dealership (selling Ford, Zephyr, and Mercury automobiles) at 125 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton.30/31 Mills was managing the McCoy & Mills dealership in Fullerton, and McCoy managed the McCoy Ford dealership in Anaheim. By the early 1960s, it was apparent that McCoy Ford had outgrown its available space on Anaheim Boulevard, and the decision was made to move westward to a larger site at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (Figures 4 and 5) to house the new car showroom, new and used car lots, repair and service facilities, and collision repair services. The new McCoy Ford dealership opened for business in late 1965 (Figures 6 and 7). Over the 40+ years of their partnership, McCoy and Mills had created two very successful Ford dealerships in Orange County. The businesses were managed by the families after Mills died in 1967, and McCoy died in 1968. McCoy Ford in Anaheim became a McCoy & Mills Ford dealership in 1980, and was closed for business in 2014. The previous Ford showroom area now houses a Hertz [Used] Car Sales operation, with the other support buildings currently being occupied by Mills Collision Center (operated by a grandson of W. Arlee Mills), RV Service Solutions, and Miranda Detail Service. 26 Los Angeles County Voter Registration Roll, 1930 for “Elton R. McCoy” and “William A. Mills”. Accessed by Ancestry.com 27 U.S. Census for 1930, “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 28 McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ 29 Orange County Directory for Fullerton, 1931; “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 30 McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ 31 Orange County Directory for Fullerton, 1939; “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 14 Figure 4: Advertisement in the Los Angeles Times, June 1965. 15 Figure 5: Los Angeles Times, December 1965. 16 Figure 6: Aerial view of the future site of McCoy Ford in 1953. (Source: NETR Historic Aerials) Figure 7: Aerial view of McCoy Ford in 1972. (Source: NETR Historic Aerials) 17 B. HISTORIC RESOURCES IDENTIFIED A site visit and intensive-level inspection of the built-environment resources at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, was performed by Pamela Daly, Architectural Historian, on March 26, 2019. The property, which had been the site of McCoy Ford from 1965 to 2014, is now comprised of four independent commercial businesses located on the property within Buildings 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown below (Figure 8)32. The four businesses are Hertz Car Sales (Building 1), Miranda Detail (Building 2), Mills Collision Center (Building 1 and Building 3), and RV Service Solutions (Building 4). The buildings and structures on the site were surveyed for evaluation of historical significance. Figure 8: Aerial view of 1600 West Lincoln Avenue with individual buildings. Based on a small number of original drawings of the McCoy Ford dealership buildings, now in the possession of Ron Mills (grandson of W. Arlee Mills), it was revealed that the main showroom building was designed by Maxwell David Jadlli, A.I.A. of Techline Designs, which was 32 The numbers assigned for each building are for the purposes of this study, and do not correlate to the building numbers noted on the original drawings. Bldg 2 Bldg 1 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 18 located in South Gate. Jadlli had been born in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1929, with the given name of Maxwell David Livschitz, which he changed to Maxwell David Jadlli when he moved to the United States in 1958.33 Jadlli is listed in the American Institute of Architects (A.I.A.) Directory for 1972, but the listing contains only his name and address, and no information about any projects he had worked on in the United States. Although Jadlli appears to have been primarily employed on projects in the Los Angeles area, his name appears in only a handful of articles in the Los Angeles Times archives, with only two of the Times articles about architectural projects. A Times article in March of 1981, presents Jadlli as an early convert to using computer-aided design and graphics for creating architectural drawings, and his presentation at a local A.I.A. meeting.34 While the showroom building (Building 1) appears to have designed by Los Angeles architect Maxwell Jadlli, the three other automobile-associated buildings (Buildings 2, 3, 4) were designed and constructed using Butler Manufacturing Company’s pre-fabricated steel frames, structural members, siding, and roofing. The steel framing members used primarily in the open-bay service structures would have been shipped to the site from Butler’s headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri. To create the concrete-masonry unit walls of the service buildings, the blocks would have been purchased locally, and the walls constructed under building specifications provided by Butler Manufacturing Company engineers/designers to tie in with the their steel frame systems. Building 1: This International style building was used primarily as the indoor showroom for the new cars, but also provided office space for the new car salesmen, the new car sales manager, and finance/warranty/auto loan manager (Figure 9). The southern portion of the building would have provided space for additional administrative support services (Figure 10). The building is one-story, has a rectangular-massing, and a flat roof system. The building was constructed on a slight grade (upwards to the south), so that the main showroom floor is at a higher elevation than West Lincoln Avenue. Drivers and passengers passing on West Lincoln Avenue would be able to see the cars on the showroom floor, and also those cars outside, surrounding the showroom building since the dealership buildings were easily visible from West Lincoln Avenue. The enclosed showroom floor portion of the building is a simple structure comprised of the showroom space walled-in on three sides by curtain-glass walls, and covered by a flat roof with wide overhanging eaves, convex-shaped fascia, and supported by steel beam columns. The curtain glass walls facing west, north, and east, set well under the roof and create a “glass display box” for the cars to be seen by the passing drivers. There is an “open air” showroom area that is situated outside of the east wall of the enclosed showroom area, under an extension of the main roof. The glass-walled and “open air” showroom areas of the building have a footprint of approximately 4,300 square feet (sf). 33 United States Petition for Naturalization for Maxwell David Jadlli, May 24, 1959. Accessed at Ancestry.com. 34 Los Angeles Times. “AIA Session to Feature Computer Designing”, March 22, 1981. 19 The portion of the building south of the showroom area, which contained the administrative and support services of the dealership, has an upside-down “U” massing, and has a footprint of approximately 6,833 sf. This portion of the building is walled almost entirely d by concrete-masonry block walls with occasional window or door openings. A 25-foot wide, flat roof awing structure supported by round steel columns spans from the rear of the showroom building, south to the RV Services (Building 4) across the customer driveways to the service areas of the property. Figure 9: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, main showroom. View looking southeast. Figure 10: Rear (south) elevation of the main showroom building. Covered walkway connects to the RV Services building (Building 4). View looking northeast. 20 Building 2: The building was constructed in 1965. It is a steel frame building from Butler Manufacturing Company that was assembled on site, and it features six separate bays within a rectangular-massed structure (Figure 11). The building measures approximately 143 feet long by 24 feet wide, is set on an east-west axis, and it has a low-pitch shed roof. The roof and sidewalls are clad with steel panels, and the steel support beams that frame the building are set in a poured concrete foundation. At some point in time, concrete-masonry unit wall was built along the north elevation of the shed-roof structure, and a 14-foot wide modular office unit was attached to the north elevation of the wall and shed-roof structure. The modular unit provided office space for the dealership’s used car operations. Figure 11: Building 2 with the detailing service bays. View looking northwest. Building 3: The building was constructed in 1965. It is a rectangular-massed, steel frame building with a low pitch gable roof set on a north-south axis, which was ordered from Butler Manufacturing Company and assembled on site. Except for the space used for an office at the northwest corner of the building, the structure has open stalls/bays for the service of automobiles and other types of motor vehicles (Figure 12). The main building was augmented with the addition of a flat roofed shed structure, built with steel support beams and steel wall panels on its west wall (Figure 13). The roof of the shed structure is attached to the main building under its eaves, and the shed was installed to provide additional covered work space for the body shop facilities. The main building measures approximately 70 feet wide by 245 feet long, and the additional shed measures 35 feet wide by 120 feet long. 21 Figure 12: Building 3 with repair and collision bays. View looking southwest. Figure 13: Additional covered area of Building 3. View looking south. Building 4: The building was constructed in 1965, and is comprised of a two-story, concrete- masonry unit, commercial building with a one-story, Butler Manufacturing Company service bay building attached to the south elevation of the concrete block structure. The concrete block portion of the building measures approximately 50 feet wide by 125 feet long, and the attached Butler Manufacturing Company building measures 62 feet wide by 120 feet long (Figures 14 and 15). Both the concrete-block structure and Butler building are rectangular-massed buildings with low-pitch gable roofs set on a north-south axis. A one-story, shed roof, T-111 sided utility building, measuring approximately 50 feet wide by 15 feet long by 15 feet tall, is attached to the south end of the service bay structure. 22 Figure 14: Building 4 with RV Services. View looking southwest. Figure 15: Service bays of Building 4. View looking northeast. C. SIGNIFICANCE The property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, has buildings and structures that were constructed over 50 years ago. Below, we will evaluate the property under federal and state criteria for significance as a historical resource. “Bus” McCoy had built a Ford dealership on Anaheim Boulevard in 1930, but by the early 1960s he knew that a larger automobile dealership complex was needed to meet the 23 needs of his existing service customers, and to allow him to expand his sales department. McCoy Ford was built in 1965 on a 5+ acre lot in the western outskirts of Anaheim. Under Criterion A of the National Register, and Criterion 1 of the California Register, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue does not appear to have been associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history in Anaheim, Orange County, or California. The McCoy Ford dealership had been built in 1965 on land previously occupied by residential buildings that had been surrounded by acres of citrus groves. With the population and associated housing boom in Southern California after the end of World War II, the acres of citrus trees were replaced by housing tracts, strip malls, shopping centers, all connected by a vastly expanded highway system. Choosing to build the new McCoy Ford dealership on West Lincoln Avenue was merely a move to expand the company’s sales and service potential as Anaheim’s commercial/retail center grew westward. McCoy Ford was not Anaheim’s first automobile dealership, nor was it a facility that contributed to the history of Ford brand automobiles in Orange County or California. The property has not made a significant contribution to the local, regional, or national history, and does not appear eligible for listing as a historical resource in the National Register or California Register. Under the criterion for evaluating properties for listing in the National Register or California Register for their association with the lives of persons important to the history of Anaheim, California, or the United States, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue does not appear eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B, or the California Register under Criterion 2. We could find no evidence that Elton R. McCoy, or any other individuals associated with the property, was a person identified as having a direct effect on the history of Ford brand automobiles or the City of Anaheim. Criterion C of the National Register, and Criterion 3 the California Register, was used to evaluate the possible significance of the architecture, design, or construction of the built- environment resources at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue. It is apparent that the automobile showroom building was designed by Mathew Jadlli as a modest interpretation of International style architecture. The showroom building used the architectural feature of curtain glass walls, which had been incorporated into residential and commercial buildings in the United States since the late 1930s, as a method of displaying the automobiles for sale. Important residential examples of the use of curtain glass walls include The Glass House (1949) by architect Phillip Johnson, the A. Conger Goodyear House (1938) by architect Edward Durrell Stone, and the Farnsworth House (1951) by architect Miles van de Rohe. Although automobile dealerships were standalone retail display structures, their purpose was no different than how department stores, banks, hotels, and motels were designed after World War II by using large areas of glass to display the products within the building, or entice the customers to come inside for a closer look. Whether it was Ford, Chevrolet, or even Volkswagen, almost all dealerships in the 1960s built dealership buildings in some variation of International style architecture, and these can 24 still be found in cities across the United States.35 There was no important aspect of design, or element of architectural detailing contributed by the architect, that caused the McCoy Ford showroom building to rise above the norm. Buildings 2, 3, and 4, that were designed and fabricated by Butler Manufacturing Company, for McCoy Ford at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, do not appear to have involved any innovative aspects of engineering design, or use of steel construction materials, to be considered significant resources. The built-environment resources on the subject property have retained a majority of their original aspects of physical integrity. These aspects include the location of the buildings within the dealership and the dealership itself in Anaheim; the architectural and engineering design of the buildings; the materials used in construction of the buildings; the workmanship applied in the construction of the buildings; the property’s association with the sales and service of motor vehicles, and the setting of the property on West Lincoln Avenue. Because the buildings, associated with the construction of the dealership in 1965 are so ubiquitous and plentiful throughout the nation, they are not able to convey a strong sense of feeling to the specific era of the late 1960s. The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue has not yielded, nor does it appear to have the potential to yield, information important to the history of the local area, California or the nation. The property does not appear eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion D, or the California Register under Criterion 4. To summarize, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue and the buildings therein, home of the McCoy Ford dealership from 1965 to 2014, does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or California Register as a historical resource. For purposes of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue is assigned California Historical Resource Status Code 6Z, to represent a property that has been found ineligible for listing in the National Register or California Register through survey evaluation. 35 The author of this report worked in the automotive industry in Ithaca, New York, in the 1970s, and can attest to the modest interpretations of the International style of architecture used to design the dealerships in a small town of 30,000. IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ancestry.com. U.S. Census data for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Los Angeles County Voter Registration data for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Los Angeles City Directory for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Orange County City Directory for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Butler Manufacturing Company. “About Us”; https://www.butlermfg.com/about/ Los Angeles Times. “AIA Session to Feature Computer Designing”, March 22, 1981. McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ Mills, Ron. Interview with Mr. Mills, March 26, 2019. NETR Historic Aerials: http://www.historicaerials.com/ Office of State Historic Preservation. California Historic Resources Inventory, Survey Workbook (excerpts). State of California: Sacramento, 1986. Parker, Patricia L. National Register Bulletin 24, “Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning.” Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985. United States Department of the Interior. National Register Bulletin 15, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” Washington, DC: National Park Service, Interagency Resources Division, rev. 1991. United States Department of the Interior. Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms, National Register Bulletin 16. Washington, DC: National Park Service, September 30, 1986. V. INVENTORY SITE FORMS (DPR SERIES 523) Will be delivered at acceptance of Draft Report U:\Projects\Old Projects\1600 W. Lincoln\Reporting\Final\1600 Lincoln report_030620.docx Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment 5 ATTACHMENT E PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA Director | Cultural Resources A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com ABOUT Patrick Maxon M.A., RPA is a Registered Professional Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of Interior's standards for historic preservation programs for archaeology and who has a permit to perform work on Bureau of Land Management land. Patrick has more than 25 years of experience in all aspects of cultural resources management, including prehistoric and historic archaeology, paleontology, ethnography, and tribal consultation. He has expertise in compliance with NEPA, CEQA, the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, and the Clean Water Act, among others. Patrick has completed hundreds of cultural resources projects that have involved (1) agency, client, Native American, and subcontractor coordination; (2) treatment plans and research design development; (3) archival research; (4) field reconnaissance; (5) site testing; (6) data recovery excavation; (7) construction monitoring; (8) site recordation; (9) site protection/preservation; (10) mapping/cartography; (11) laboratory analysis; and (12) report production. He has managed a number of projects within the jurisdiction of the USACE, the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Reclamation, and other federal agencies that require compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. He has also completed projects throughout Southern California under CEQA for State and local governments and municipalities, including Caltrans, the Department of General Services (DGS), the California Energy Commission, the California Department of Water Resources, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the Los Angeles Unified School District, and others. SELECT EXPERIENCE/PROJECTS Noppenberger Work/Live Development Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment, Laguna Beach, CA: Cultural Resources Manager for the project which consisted of a plan to raze existing structures on site in order to build a combined Work/Live development for the owner’s business. Pat completed a cultural resources literature review of the project site at the SCCIC located at California State University, Fullerton, and examined the Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) maintained by the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) for Orange County. The results of this research were used to help guide the subsequent field survey and were compiled and summarized in the Cultural Resources Technical Report. Pat also contacted the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for a review of their Sacred Lands File and obtained a list of Native American contacts for the project area. He then prepared and sent informational letters to all NAHC-listed contacts in order to ensure a good-faith effort of participation. Additionally, an intensive cultural resources field survey of the project site was conducted for prehistoric (Native American) or historic (non-Native American) archaeological and other potential historic resources (e.g., buildings, structures). A historic evaluation of the existing structures found that the existing bungalow cottage on the property is eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and mitigation measures including preserving the site or documenting it under the Historic American Building Survey (HABS, Level III) was recommended. Psomas presented the results of the study to the City of Laguna Beach in a CEQA-compliant technical letter report. Newport Banning Ranch Cultural Resources Services, Newport Beach, CA: Cultural Resources Manager for the ongoing Cultural Resources services for the Newport Banning Ranch Project which would have initially allow for the development of hundreds of residential dwelling units; thousands of square feet (sf) of commercial uses; EDUCATION 1994/MA/Anthropology/Califo rnia State University, Fullerton 1987/BA/Psychology/Sociology /Towson State University, Towson, MD VCS TEAM MEMBER SINCE 2017 CERTIFICATIONS/TRAINING Riverside County Transportation and Land Management Agency Certified Archaeologist/Riverside County California Energy Commission Cultural Resources Specialist/ Registered Professional Archaeologist (National)/No. 11468/Register of Professional Archaeologists Orange County Certified Archaeologist/Orange County National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Compliance Advanced Certification, 2002/ Principal Investigator, Southern California/Bureau of Land Management Qualified Archaeologist- Secretary of Interior Standards and Guidelines of Professional Qualification & Standards for Archeology, as per Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 61/ PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA Director| Cultural Resources VCS Environmental A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com a resort inn; and public parks on the 401-acre site. A large portion of the site was proposed for permanent open space including restored habitat, public trails, and consolidated oil production facilities. Cultural resources studies conducted included archaeological, historical, and paleontological investigations to support the project's EIR. Initial investigations consisted of (1) a Phase I reconnaissance of the Project site to confirm that the existing conditions of the site were the same as found during the previous survey in 2008; (2) Phase II test-level excavation of eight prehistoric and three historic archaeological sites present on the site to characterize the sites and determine eligibility for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources; (3) an assessment and evaluation of the built-environment resources associated with the West Newport Oil Company development on site; and (4) a paleontological assessment of the project site's potential for the presence of sensitive rock formations and fossil resources. Three archaeological sites were deemed significant as a result of the study, and the project site’s paleontological significance was deemed “high”. However, no historical resources associated with oil extraction operations were identified. Mr. Maxon oversaw the completion of fieldwork, the preparation of archaeological, historical and paleontological technical reports, and subsequently prepared the cultural resources section of the EIR for the project. This initial work was followed by extensive Native American and California Coastal Commission (CCC) consultations; preparation of an Archaeological Research Plan; and excavation and monitoring of shovel and backhoe test pits to test the boundaries of five known archaeological sites on the property that would be impacted by the planned development. After the CCC denied the residential project in late 2016, we were retained by Armstrong Petroleum to assist with the cultural resources investigations necessary to facilitate the planned consolidation of the oil production facilities on site. This included the development of an Archaeological Research Plan to guide boundary studies at the site, an Archaeological Mitigation and Monitoring Plan to guide monitoring during ground disturbing activities at the site and an Archaeological Avoidance Plan to facilitate the avoidance of one known archaeological site that lies near the planned development. These plans were approved by the California Coastal Commission and are in place when project activities commence. Future work will include data recovery excavations and/or site protection/preservation of significant cultural and paleontological resources impacted by the proposed project. Archaeological/Paleontological monitoring will be undertaken during grading of the project site. Newport Dunes Resort Hotel Project, Newport Beach, CA: Mr. Maxon was the project manager for the cultural resources study of the Newport Dunes project in Newport Beach. The project plans include the construction of a hotel and other amenities to complement the existing amenities on site. The Phase I study consists of a records search and literature review, Native American scoping, a pedestrian survey, and preparation of a technical report. The entire Newport Dunes site, initially constructed around 1958, is a historic landscape. Sunset Ridge Park Project Phase I Cultural Resources Study, Newport Beach, CA: Project Manager for this project, which proposed to develop the approximate 18.9-acre site with active and passive recreational uses. Components of the park project would include one baseball field; two youth soccer fields; a playground area including a tot lot; a picnic area with shade structures, picnic tables, and seating areas; a memorial garden; an overlook area with a shade structure and seating; and restroom facilities. The park is also proposed to include three pedestrian access areas: one along West Coast Highway PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Society for California Archaeology Society for American Archaeology Association of Environmental Professionals American Cultural Resources Association PATRICK MAXON, M.A., RPA Director| Cultural Resources VCS Environmental A certified DBE, SBE & WBE firm 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949.489.2700 | vcsenvironmental.com and two along Superior Avenue. Pat conducted a Phase I cultural resources study for the property, which consisted of cultural and paleontological records searches, Native American consultation, and a pedestrian survey. Four cultural resources (CA-ORA-1600, CA-ORA-1601H, CA-ORA-1602H, and CA-ORA-1610H) are recorded on the project site and five cultural resources studies have included the project area. The four sites were evaluated as part of the adjacent proposed Newport Banning Ranch development and were found not to be significant; however, monitoring of grading for the development was recommended. Subsequent monitoring of grading yielded a host of fossil specimens, included Pleistocene vertebrate species such as bison, camel, and horse; as well as invertebrate species including fish, crustaceans, and shell, recovered from the mechanical screening machine employed during grading. All specimens were cleaned, identified and evaluated, then were submitted to the Cooper Center in Santa Ana for permanent curation. Lido House Hotel, Newport Beach, CA.: Mr. Maxon was the project manager during grading for the Lido House Hotel, a Cape Cod style boutique hotel at the former location of Newport Beach City Hall. All grading related to development of the hotel was monitored. No cultural or paleontological resources were recovered. Orange Coast College Maritime Academy, Newport Beach, CA.: Mr. Maxon was the project manager during a Phase I cultural resources study for the new building project on PCH. The project anticipates construction of a new building on the inland side of the PCH to complement the main location of the college’s School of Sailing and Seamanship. The Phase I study consisted of a records search and literature review, Native American scoping, a pedestrian survey, and preparation of a technical report. No resources were discovered. State Route 73 Northbound Widening Project Biological and Cultural Resources Monitoring, Orange County, CA: Cultural Resources Manager for the State Route (SR) 73 Northbound Widening project. The improvements increased traffic lanes and bridge structures within the center median area. The project team was responsible for daily monitoring and for preparing the monitoring reports required as part of the environmental documentation. Pat was the Project Manager for the archaeological and paleontological compliance monitoring. Monitoring occurred when native sediments, potentially sensitive for cultural and/or paleontological resources, were expected to be encountered, and continued on an as-needed basis throughout project-related ground- disturbing activities. Daily logs of all monitoring activities were maintained and provided to the client and TCA on a weekly basis. One fossil locality consisting of sand dollar fossil impressions was collected, cleaned, bagged, and given to the TCA. Pat recommended that the fossils be prepared for curation by a qualified Invertebrate Paleontologist and submitted to an appropriate storage facility. Cultural Resources Assessment Orange County Sanitation District 6 Trunk Sewer Relief Project, Newport Beach, CA: Cultural Resources Manager for the cultural resources technical report prepared for the trunk relief project that would modify the existing trunk sewer to prevent future sewage spills. Psomas completed a Phase I cultural resources assessment of the project site to determine if cultural resources would be impacted by the proposed project and to prepare a cultural resources sensitivity map depicting the relative cultural resources sensitivity of different segments of the pipeline alignment. PAMELA DALY 2242 El Capitan Drive, Riverside, California 92506 (951) 369-1366 Education •Master of Science - Historic Preservation - University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. 1998 Awarded Graduate Teaching Fellowship in Historic Preservation. •Bachelor of Science - Business Administration - Elmira College, Elmira, New York. 1994 Experience and Skills Historic Preservation ● Federal Level Projects Section 106 – Historic Resource Evaluation of Hillsdale Cinema Building, San Mateo, CA Section 106 – Edwards Air Force Base, CA – Evaluation of 27 Cold War-era buildings for listing in the National Register, and review of building survey records for all built-environment resources on the entire base. Section 106 - Riverside Auto Camp, Red Bluff, CA Section 106 – Programmatic Agreement for the Waterman Housing Development Project, San Bernardino, CA Section 106 – Kelly Cutover Transmission Project, Daggett, San Bernardino County, CA Section 106 – Ballona Wetlands Restoration Project, Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA Section 106 – Diablo Country Club Pump System, Diablo, Contra Costa County, CA Section 106 – Tahoe City Water Company Tank, Tahoe National Forest, Tahoe City, CA Section 106 – Carbon Canyon Diversion Channel, Orange County Flood Control District, Anaheim, CA Section 106 – 404 Permit – Historic Context for Phase I Ballona Creek Wetlands Restoration, Culver City, CA Section 106 – 404 Permit – Historic Resource Evaluation for Lake Street Improvements, Lake Elsinore, CA Section 106 - 404 Permit – Historic Resource Evaluation for Foothill Parkway Extension Project, Corona, CA Section 106 – NEPA Historic Resource Evaluation of Green Beach Trestle, San Onofre, CA Section 106 – NHPA Historic Resource Evaluation of Brea Tracks Project, Brea, CA Section 106 – NEPA Historic Resource Evaluation of Upper Arroyo Seco Canyon, Pasadena, CA Section 106 – NEPA Historic Resource Evaluation of Big Santa Anita Wash, Angeles National Forest, CA. Section 106 – NEPA Historic Resource Evaluation of a segment of the California Aqueduct, Kings County, CA. Section 106 – Federal Highway Administration – Historic Resources Evaluation, Mitigation, and Treatment Plan for the Westside Subway Extension, Metropolitan Transportation Agency, Los Angeles, CA. Survey and evaluation of buildings, bridges, landscapes dating from 1910 to 1975 in an eight-mile long corridor. Section 106 – U.S. Housing and Urban Development – San Bernardino Housing Agency – Historic Resource Evaluation of Waterman Housing Development, San Bernardino County, CA. Survey and evaluation of a public housing development dating from 1943. Section 106 – Claremont Police Communication Tower, Los Angeles County, CA. Perform evaluation for siting of a communications cell tower. Section 106 – U.S. Forest Service, San Bernardino National Forest. Developed building plans for the construction of a new recreational cabin to be constructed in a historic cabin tract. Plans reviewed and accepted by California SHPO. Section 106 – Cobb Reservoir, Angeles National Forest, Altadena, CA. Perform a Historic Resource Survey and Eligibility Investigation of a privately owned reservoir constructed in 1910. Section 106 – Keyes Mine and Walker Cabin, Sequoia National Forest, Keyesville, CA. Perform a Historic Resource Survey and Eligibility Investigation for structures related to the early mining days of California. The project also included the preparation of detailed drawings and structural evaluations of the stamp mill building and Walker barn. Section 106 – Bitter Creek National Wildlife Refuge, Maricopa, CA. Perform a Historic Resource Survey and Eligibility Investigation for the Hudson Family Homestead Ranch Historic District for eligibility to the National Register. The project also included the preparation of detailed drawings and structural evaluations of the building known as “Percy’s Place”. Section 106 – Ivanpah Valley, Eastern Mojave Desert, CA. Perform a Historic Resource Survey and Eligibility Investigation for two historic roads and a railroad line for eligibility to the National Register. Pamela Daly – Resume Page 2 of 8 Section 106 – Army Corp of Engineers, 404 Permit Historic Resource Assessment Report of the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel, part of the Orange County Flood Control System, Bolsa Chica, CA. Section 106 – Evaluate impact of proposed removal and storage of National Register-eligible object at Camp Parks Army Reserve Base, Dublin, CA. Section 106 – Naval Air Station, North Island, San Diego, California. Historic Resources Survey and Eligibility Investigation of thirteen historic airplane hangars for eligibility to the National Register. Section 106 - Edwards Air Force Base, California – Report of findings on 37 Historic Wells and Homesteads. Includes HAER documentation, analysis and curation of historic and pre-historic artifacts, site form preparation, archival research, Phase II and Phase III reports. Section 106 – Air Force Research Laboratory, Mesa, Arizona – Historic Building Assessment and Evaluation Report. Project included archival research, historic context, building description and site form. Section 106 – Army Corp of Engineers, 404 Permit review of the decommissioned Marine Corps Air Station El Toro, California. Project consisted of re-surveying 76 buildings and structures previously reviewed in 1996 for National Register Eligibility. Project included field survey, archival research, and updating site forms. Section 106 - Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada – Historic Building Report on Capehart & Wherry Housing. Project included archival research, site forms, photography. Section 106 - Andersen Air Force Base, Guam - Supervise archaeological subcontractors Phase III survey project for Air Force client. Section 106 - Clear Air Force Base, Alaska – Project to create booklet, bronze plaque and outdoor interpretive signs to record the Cold War radar operations. Section 106 – Bureau of Land Management, Kern Front Oil Fields, Bakersfield, CA - Historic Building Assessment and Evaluation Report for leaseholder. Project included archival research, historic context, building description, industrial archeology investigation and site form. Section 106 – Army Corp of Engineers, Union Pacific Railroad - Historic Building Assessment and Evaluation Report of all the bridges and culverts located in 102 mile section. Project included field survey, archival research, historic context, bridge and culvert descriptions, and site forms. Section 106 review of Jim’s Corner Store, Burlington, VT. Section 106 Level 1 Reconnaissance of Jericho, VT, Rt. 15 intersection. Section 106 Level 1 Reconnaissance of Milton, VT, sidewalk project. Section 106 Level 1 Reconnaissance of Essex, VT, sidewalk project. Section 106 Level 1 Reconnaissance of Town of Hartford, VT, sidewalk/bike project. CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Olney Creek Bridge Replacement, Redding, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Pacific Electric ROW, Garden Grove, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Sharon Avenue Bridge over A.C.I.D. canal, Redding, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of SR14 and SR138 Interchange Project, Palmdale, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Interstate 405 Widening Project, Irvine, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Old Newport Blvd. Improvement, Newport Beach, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Brittan School Sidewalk Improvements, Sutter, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of Interstate 10 and Avenue 50 Interchange, Coachella, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Survey of APE, Route 94, Jumal, San Diego County, CA CALTRANS – Finding of Effects for High Desert Corridor Project, Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties CALTRANS – Historic Resource Survey of APE for Park Avenue Bridge, Balboa Island, Orange County, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resource Evaluation of two bridges in Madera County, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resources Evaluation of Kentucky Avenue and Streets Widening, Woodland, CA CALTRANS – Historic Resources Evaluation of five housing tracts and two individual resources for the Brookhurst Road Widening Project, Anaheim, CA. CALTRANS – Historic Resources Evaluation, Lincoln Avenue Widening Project, Orange, CA. CALTRANS – Historic Resources Evaluation, Bridge Evaluation, and Finding of Effect for Araz Bridge in the All-American Canal Historic District, Araz Junction, CA. CALTRANS – Historic Resources Evaluation Report and Finding of Effect for the Park Once Transit Parking Structure, Redlands Santa Fe Depot Historic District, Redlands, CA. CALTRANS – Survey and evaluation of the project corridor for the proposed Cabot-Camino Bridge, Mission Viejo, CA. Pamela Daly – Resume Page 3 of 8 CALTRANS – Survey and evaluation of Pacific Mobile Home Park, Huntington Beach, CA. CALTRANS – Finding of Project Effects, Victoria Avenue, Riverside, CA. CALTRANS - Survey and evaluation of 45 buildings and structures along State Route 99, Stockton, CA. CALTRANS - Survey and evaluation of 1915 railroad bridge for seismic repair project, El Monte, CA. CALTRANS - Survey and evaluation of 75 buildings and structures along State Route 99, Manteca, CA. CALTRANS - Survey and evaluation of Pacific Coast Highway Interchange, Long Beach, CA. CALTRANS - Review of residential structures located in the project area, Red Hill Avenue, Orange County. NYSDOT - Survey of historic bridges in Owego, Oswego and Onondaga Counties, New York. ISTEA Historic Resource survey, Lake Champlain Railroad Causeway/Bikepath, Colchester, VT. VSA22 Historic Resource review, Goodrich Memorial Library, Newport, VT. VAOT Highway Resurfacing Program, Dufresne-Henry Engineers. 2001-2003. National Register Historic Landscape survey of historic agricultural properties in Essex County, NY. Intensive level survey of 8 historic farmsteads. National Register Nomination for Residential Historic District, Vergennes, VT. NR nomination of 110 residences and outbuildings dating ca. 1790 to 1950. National Register Nomination of Fairfield Baptist Church, Fairfield, VT. Nomination of rural community church with ties to President Chester Arthur. National Register nomination for Laurel Hall, Cuttingsville, VT. Nomination of private country villa, conservatory, carriage barn, and mausoleum. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) Update – Corona Naval Weapons Center – update historic properties treatment. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) Update – Seal Beach Naval Weapons Center – update historic properties treatment. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) Update – Fort Hunter Liggett, U.S. Army Reserves Base – update historic properties treatment. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) Update – Camp Parks, U.S. Army Reserves Base – update historic properties treatment. Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) – Moffat Field, U.S. Army Real Property – create historic properties treatment for ICRMP. ● State Level Projects CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of Vanguard University Master Plan, Costa Mesa, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of Properties within Hampton Inn Project, Santa Ana, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Evaluation of Historic Lopez Vineyard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment for Colony Center East Project, Ontario, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Evaluation of 281 Cypress Drive, Laguna Beach, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Evaluation of Canyon Crest Family Housing Complex, UC Riverside, CA CEQA – Phase I Evaluation of project activities to Andersen School and UCLA campus, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Evaluation of three parcels on Old Santa Susana Pass Road, Chatsworth, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of Orange County Water District pump station, Huntington Beach, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of 40174 Lakeview Drive, Big Bear City, CA CEQA – Evaluation of project impacts to Metropolitan Hospital Historic District, Norwalk, CA CEQA - Historic Resource Assessment of Margan Apartment Building, U.C.L.A., CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of First Baptist Church, Ontario, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment of North School Campus, Hermosa Beach, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Sunkist Water Tower, Ontario, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resources, Culver Oil Field, Culver City, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resources, Rosecrans Pump Station, Fullerton, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Huntington Middle School, San Marino, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Galvin Park and Baseball Field, Ontario, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resource, Orange County Sewer District, Newport Beach, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resources, Santa Clarita, Ca CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Lincoln Street Improvements, Taft, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Chollas Creek Bikeway Project, San Diego, CA Pamela Daly – Resume Page 4 of 8 CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Brookside Equestrian Center, Walnut, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of George Washington School, Colton Joint Unified School District, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 985 South Hamilton Blvd., Pomona, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Oak Crest School, San Dieguito School District, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 812 North State Street, Hemet, Riverside County, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Killefer School, Orange Unified School District, Orange County, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the Dam at Lake Gregory, San Bernardino County, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 1336 – 1365 East Colorado Boulevard Project, Pasadena, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of St. George Catholic Church (1923), Ontario, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Upper Arroyo Seco Parkway, Pasadena, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for Old Schoolhouse, Azusa School District, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resources, West Desert Hot Springs Master Drainage Project, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 12655 Garber Street, Pacoima, Los Angeles County, CA CEQA – Phase 1 Evaluation of Potential Historic Resources, Moorpark, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Magnolia-Plaza Substations, Riverside, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 777-779 South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Granite Mountain Biology Center, University California Riverside, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of UCLA Stuart House, Santa Monica, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 705 No. Camden Drive, Beverly Hills, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 56831 Olive Avenue, Thermal, CA CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 18771 Oriente Drive, Yorba Linda, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Beckman Coulter complex, Fullerton, CA. CEQA – Evaluation of proposed project to Central Historic District, Pasadena, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Palm Springs High School campus, Palm Springs, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of El Camino Community College, Torrance, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Camp Kilpatrick Juvenile Detention Camp, Los Angeles County, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Jordan High School, Long Beach, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Pitchess Detention Center, Los Angeles County, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for Santa Anita Wash Debris Basin, Los Angeles County, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Ramon Academy Administration Building, Palm Springs High School, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Bryn Mawr Schoolhouse, Loma Linda, CA. CEQA – Evaluation of proposed project to Irvine Regional Park, Orange County, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Holtz Ranch property, Silverado Canyon, CA. CEQA – Evaluation of new construction on Santa Fe Avenue, Fullerton, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Upper Sunset Canyon Debris Basin Dam, Los Angeles County, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 1920s adobe-brick homestead in Lancaster, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the Glendale Courthouse, Glendale, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the California State Printing Plant, Sacramento, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the Olympic Tank Farm, Wilmington, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the Swiss Ross (Albion) Dairy property, Los Angeles, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of three parcels on Cole Avenue and the El Nido Hotel, Hollywood, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the property at 255 St. Ann’s Drive, Laguna Beach, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for the properties at 625 and 641 Landfair Avenue, and 548 and 564 Glenrock Avenue, Westwood Village, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of the property at 37162 South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of a 1940s self-contained sewage treatment plant, Lancaster, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for the Riverside County Economic Development Agency - Coachella Valley Rescue Mission, Indio, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for the Brookhurst Street Widening Project, Anaheim, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for Riverside County Economic Development Agency – Riviera Restaurant, Rubidoux, CA. Pamela Daly – Resume Page 5 of 8 CEQA – Perform peer review services on documents prepared for California Energy Commission for a project in Palmdale, CA. Prepare historic context of project area, and describe potential impacts to built-environment resources and provide recommended mitigation measures. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for 4149 Chestnut Street, Riverside, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for 942 West Holt Avenue, Pomona, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Banning Ranch, Newport Beach, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report for Centennial Ranch Project, Gorman, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of historic irrigation system, Turlock, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of 2385 South Willow Avenue, Rialto, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report, Orange County Civic Center, Santa Ana, CA. CEQA – Historic Resource Assessment Report of Los Angeles County Fire Station, Malibu, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of water diversion features, Sonoma, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report for Fontana Fire Station #1, and American Legion Post 262, constructed in 1927. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report for Department of Water Resources, Redlands, CA. Record and research historic Cold War-era structures and landscape. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of historic date and citrus farm in Coachella, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report for Glendale College Expansion Project. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of residential structure in Apple Valley, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of structures in Loma Linda, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of residence on Cedar Street, Glendale, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of 1894 carriage house in Los Angeles, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of farmhouse in the City of Moreno Valley, CA. CEQA – Historic Resources Assessment Report of four properties on Carlton Avenue, Hollywood, CA. CEQA - Wrightwood Housing Development – record and research historic structure located in the project ROW. Consult with San Bernardino County environmental department. CEQA – White Springs Sulphur Pools, Riverside, CA – Phase I survey for determination of CRHR and NR eligibility. CEQA – Fitch Avenue Bridge – Phase I survey determination of rural one-lane bridge. CEQA –New Model Colony housing development – Phase I & II survey of rural agricultural properties, Ontario, CA. ● Local Level Projects Evaluate building projects for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, Riverside, CA Create interpretive signage for Sunkist Water Tower and Tank, Ontario, CA Construction monitoring for excavation road work near Pacific Electric rails, Los Angeles, CA Create interpretive signage for Waterman Gardens Housing Complex, San Bernardino, CA HABS-level documentation of Waterman Gardens Housing Complex, San Bernardino, CA Evaluation of proposed project to historic property in Rancho Cucamonga, CA HAER-level documentation of Sunkist Water Tank and Tower, Ontario, CA HABS-level documentation of Mabey Canyon Creek stone bridge, Corona, CA Evaluation of proposed project to stone wall at 18771 Oriente Drive, Yorba Linda, CA Construction monitoring of the Beckman Coulter project, Fullerton, CA Evaluation of proposed project to Governor’s Mansion, Sacramento, CA HABS Level 1 documentation for Sexlinger House and Orchard, Santa Ana, CA Construction monitoring for the Pine Valley Highway Bridge, San Diego County, CA Evaluation of proposed alterations to Rawlins House, City Landmark Property, Fullerton, CA HABS-level documentation for mitigation of rock walls in Irvine Regional Park, Orange County, CA. Develop Mitigation Measures Plan (MMP) for historic resource listed on the National Register and California Register of Historic Resources, in accordance with the Secretary of the Interiors Standard of Treatment for Preservation of Historic Structures. Redlands, CA. HAER-level documentation of Reservoir #1, Yorba Linda, CA. HABS-level documentation of Fire Station #1, Fontana, CA. HABS-level documentation of American Legion Post 261, Fontana, CA. Pamela Daly – Resume Page 6 of 8 HABS level documentation of Riverock bungalows in Riverside, CA. HABS-level documentation of The Quilt Stop, Sparks, NV. HABS-level documentation of the Snyder Ranch, Apple Valley, CA. Historic resource evaluation of commercial property on Euclid Avenue, Ontario, CA. Viewscape review for proposed housing development, Reno, NV. Historic Sites and Structures Survey for the Town of Shelburne, VT. Phase II survey of 40 residential and agricultural properties Survey Plan for the City of Burlington, Burlington, VT. Ten-year plan for future survey work in city. Urban Survey, 2000, City of Burlington, Burlington, VT. Phase I survey and photographs of 250 urban historic resources. Urban Survey, 2001, City of Burlington, Burlington, VT. Phase I survey and photographs of 220 urban historic resources. Historic Sites and Structures Survey: Phase IV for the Town of Windsor, VT. Phase II survey of 40 structures and historic context of Buena Vista District. Historic Sites and Structures Survey: Phase V for the Town of Windsor, VT. Review of 1977 National Register nomination, proposed additions, and additional description of resources. ● Architectural Conservation Projects (per Secretary of the Interior’s Standards) Develop exterior paint treatment for the historic Sunkist Water Tank and Tower, Ontario, CA Prepare preliminary cost estimate for the rehabilitation/adaptive reuse of historic Azusa Schoolhouse. Develop exterior alteration plans for alterations to Palm Springs High School Auditorium, Palm Springs, CA Develop exterior design plans for the rehabilitation and addition to a historic cabin in the San Bernardino National Forest. Provide consulting services to the City of LaVerne to review the proposed alterations to the auditorium in Founder’s Hall on LaVerne University. Review exterior design plans for the alteration of the Johnson Cabin in the San Bernardino National Forest. Develop exterior design plans for the alteration of a historic cabin in the San Bernardino National Forest. Develop exterior design plans for the rebuilding of a historic cabin in San Bernardino National Forest. Historic Structures Report, including conditions assessment and treatment plan for 1885 Lindo Lake Boathouse, Lakeside, CA. Historic Structures Report, including conditions assessment and treatment plan for 1887 Bancroft Rock House, Spring Valley, CA. Historic Structures Report, including conditions assessment and treatment plan for 1865Rutland Railroad Train Station, Vergennes, VT. Historic Structures Report for emergency stabilization of endangered historic property in Essex, NY. Repair and restoration of early 20th century house in Riverside, CA. Architectural repair specifications for the 1805 Bradley Law Office, Westminster, VT Project management of early 19th century house rehabilitation, St. Albans, VT. Repairs and maintenance of converted barn in Ithaca, NY. Historic paint finishes analysis for Town of Rockingham, VT. Historic paint finishes analysis for Middlebury Town Hall, VT. Historic paint finishes analysis for Labor Union Hall, Barre, VT. Repair and restoration of cast iron fence for Greystone Mansion, Essex, NY. Photo survey of Labor Union Hall, Barre, VT, prior to rehabilitation. Evaluation and research of historic colonial tannery structure in Essex, NY. Rehabilitation of 19th century barn for use as residence, Trumansburg, NY. ● Historic Preservation Educational Projects Presentation to the Orange County Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) “Current Issues with CEQA and Historic Resources.” Presentation to the Mission Inn Museum – “Hidden Histories.” Presentation to the Moreno Valley Historical Society – “Explaining Historic Resource Eligibility Criteria.” Presentation to the U.S. Forest Service – Region 5, “Evaluating Historic Resources.” Create text on the history of the San Antonio Valley after 1850 for Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve. Education and slide presentation of American architectural styles. Pamela Daly – Resume Page 7 of 8 Education and slide presentation of California revival architectural styles. Walking tours of Windsor, Vergennes and Shelburne, Vermont. Research paper on decorative historic painted finishes created in Vermont public buildings during the late 19th century. ● Other Preservation Projects: Adaptive Reuse – Downtown Development Project for six historic structures in Morrisville, VT. Develop Revised Design Review and Zoning Guidelines, City of Burlington, VT. Part of team to develop guidelines for protecting historic resources in the city. Presenter at Vermont Historic Preservation Conference on Industrial Archeology and site research. Developed and implemented educational tours and day programs of historic sites and properties. Awarded grant proposals for educational and historic preservation projects. Developed and designed fundraising and publicity brochures. ● Preservation Skills Maintenance and repairs to historic structures including painting, mortar analysis, mortar repointing, and plaster repair. Historic Structures Reports - condition assessment reports. Use of the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the restoration, rehabilitation, or restoration of historic buildings. Historical paint analysis (chromochronology). Research of historic structures using deeds, wills, public records and archival documentation. Nomination of historic sites and structures for the National Register of Historic Places. Section 106 and 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentive program. California “Mills Act” historic preservation program. Business Management/Accounting • Over 25 years experience in financial management and accounting. • Competence in all accounting aspects: profit and not-for-profit organizations. • Successful grant writing and funding from state, private and federal agencies. • Extensive experience corresponding with federal, state, county and private organizations regarding agency fiscal requirements. • Analyzed the efficiency of business internal accounting systems, implementing procedures to improve financial accuracy and operating cost-effectiveness. Financial Project Management/Supervision • Managed agency and individual project budgets from $350,000 to $2.5 million. • Responsible for overseeing budget and direct labor requirements of Government contracts. • Financial project management for 26 concurrent projects valued at $29 million. • Coordinated five departments to meet financial and organizational goals. • Supervised eight project managers to meet contractual agreements. • Negotiated prime and sub-contractor agreements and purchase orders. • Qualified contract specialist with U.S. Department of Defense, NASA and National Park Service. Experience with FAR, DFAR and associated regulations. Employment History 2005 - present Architectural Historian Consultant Daly & Associates, Riverside, CA. 2003 – 2005 Sr. Architectural Historian Earth Tech, Inc., Colton, CA. 1998 to June 2003 Architectural Historian Consultant Daly & Associates, Shelburne, VT. 1998 (two semesters) Teaching Assistant Historic Preservation Dept., Pamela Daly – Resume Page 8 of 8 University of Vermont 1989 - 1997 Director of Contracts Odyssey Research Assoc., Inc., Ithaca, NY. 1987 - 1989 Senior Corporate Accountant Emerson Power Transmission, Ithaca, NY. Volunteer History 1999– 2003 Commission Member – Town of Shelburne, Vermont Historic Preservation Design Review Board. 1996 - 1997 President - Board of Directors, Historic Ithaca, NY. 1993 - 1996 Board Member, Secretary, Historic Ithaca, NY. Professional Affiliations APT – Association for Preservation Technology LTA - Land Trust Alliance NTHP - National Trust for Historic Preservation SIA - Society for Industrial Archeology VAF - Vernacular Architecture Forum 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix C Draft Historic Resource Evaluation Report for 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County, CA, Daly & Associates, April 2019 DRAFT HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION REPORT for 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Assessor Parcel Numbers: 250-091-009; 250-091-010; 250-091-011 Anaheim, Orange County, CA Prepared for: VCS Environmental, Inc. 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Prepared by: Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P. Daly & Associates 2242 El Capitan Drive Riverside, CA 92506 April 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 A. Project Description .............................................................................................................. 1 B. Background Information ...................................................................................................... 1 C. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 1 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................................ 6 A. Federal Level ........................................................................................................................ 6 1. National Register of Historic Places .................................................................................... 6 B. State Level ............................................................................................................................ 8 1. California Register of Historical Resources .......................................................................... 9 2. California Office of Historical Preservation Survey Methodology ..................................... 10 III. EVALUATION ............................................................................................................................ 12 A. Historic Context ................................................................................................................. 12 1. Anaheim ............................................................................................................................. 12 2. Post World War II (1945 to 1965) ...................................................................................... 12 3. McCoy Ford ........................................................................................................................ 12 B. Historic Resources Identified ............................................................................................. 17 C. Significance ........................................................................................................................ 22 IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................................... 25 V. INVENTORY SITE FORMS (DPR SERIES 523) .............................................................................. 26 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This assessment report documents and evaluates the federal and state significance, and eligibility of the automotive-related commercial property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, within the boundary of the City of Anaheim (City), in Orange County, California (Figures 1, 2, and 3). The property is comprised of three legal parcels with the Orange County Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) of 250-091-009, 250-091-010, and 250-091-011. The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue has upon it built-environment resources that are of sufficient age for them to be recorded on Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 Series Site Recording Forms and evaluated for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) and/or the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). Our report includes a discussion of the survey methodology used, a brief historic context of the property and surrounding area, and the identification and formal evaluation of the subject property for historical significance. B. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The current study of the three parcels, identified as 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, within the Project boundary was conducted using data from historic aerial photographs and original architectural drawings for the buildings and structures constructed on the property in 1965. As the built-environment resources on the property have achieved a sufficient age (generally over 50 year old for buildings, structures, features, objects, or man-made landscapes, under the California Environmental Quality Act), the properties were investigated under the auspices of a qualified architectural historian to evaluate the eligibility of listing the buildings and structures that comprised McCoy Ford from 1966 to 2014 as historical resources in the National Register or California Register. C. METHODOLOGY This historic resource assessment, and evaluation of the built-environment properties within the proposed project area, was conducted by Pamela Daly, M.S.H.P., Principal Architectural Historian. Ms. Daly holds a Master of Science Degree in Historic Preservation from the University of Vermont, and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Management (with a minor in History). In order to identify and evaluate the subject properties as potential historical resources, a multi-step methodology was utilized. An inspection of the site and the existing structures, 2 3 4 5 combined with a review of data for this parcel, was performed to document existing conditions and assist in assessing and evaluating the property for significance. Photographs were taken of the structures, landscape, or other points of interest situated in the proposed project area, during the intensive-level survey. The National Register and California Register historical significance criteria were employed to evaluate the significance of the subject property. In addition, the following tasks were performed for the study: • The National Register and California Register property inventories were searched. • Site-specific research was conducted on the subject property utilizing historic topographic and road maps, Orange County/Anaheim City Directories, newspaper articles and advertisement from the Los Angeles Times, historic photographs, and other published sources. • Background research of prior land owners was performed at local and regional historic archives, and through internet resources such as available from Ancestry.com and GenealogyBank.com. • Ordinances, statutes, regulations, bulletins, and technical materials relating to federal, state, and local historic preservation, designation assessment processes, and related programs were reviewed and analyzed. 6 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Historic resources fall within the jurisdiction of several levels of government. Federal laws provide the framework for the identification, and in certain instances, protection of historic resources. Additionally, states and local jurisdictions play active roles in the identification, documentation, and protection of such resources within their communities. The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, particularly Section 106 of the NHPA, and CEQA are the primary laws and regulations governing the evaluation and significance of historic resources of national, state, regional, and local importance. A description of these relevant laws and regulations is presented below. In analyzing the historic significance of the subject property, criteria for designation under federal, state, and local landmark programs were considered. Additionally, the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) survey methodology was used to survey and rate the relative significance of the subject property. A. FEDERAL LEVEL 1. National Register of Historic Places First authorized by the Historic Sites Act of 1935, the National Register was established by the NHPA as “an authoritative guide to be used by Federal, State, and local governments, private groups and citizens to identify the Nation’s cultural resources and to indicate what properties should be considered for protection from destruction or impairment.”1 The National Register recognizes properties that are significant at the national, state and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the National Register, the quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture must be in a district, site, building, structure, or object that possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, and:2 A. is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or that represents the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or 1 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 36 § 60.2. 2 Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms, National Register Bulletin 16, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, September 30, 1986 (“National Register Bulletin 16”). This bulletin contains technical information on comprehensive planning, survey of cultural resources, and registration in the National Register of Historic Places. 7 D. yields, or may be likely to yield, information important to prehistory or history. A property eligible for listing in the National Register must meet one or more of the four criteria (A-D) defined above. In addition, unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it must be at least 50 years old to be eligible for National Register listing. In addition to meeting the criteria of significance, a property must have integrity. “Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance.”3 According to National Register Bulletin 15, within the concept of integrity, the National Register criteria recognize seven aspects or qualities that, in various combinations, define integrity. To retain historic integrity a property will always possess several, and usually most, of these seven aspects. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is paramount for a property to convey its significance.4 The seven factors that define integrity are location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The following is excerpted from National Register Bulletin 15, which provides guidance on the interpretation and application of these factors. • Location is the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred.5 • Design is the combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of the property.6 • Setting is the physical environment of a historic property.7 • Materials are the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property.8 • Workmanship is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory.9 • Feeling is property’s expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time.10 3 National Register Bulletin 15, page 44. 4 Ibid. 5 “The relationship between the property and its location is often important to understanding why the property was created or why something happened. The actual location of a historic property, complemented by its setting is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Except in rare cases, the relationship between a property and its historic associations is destroyed if the property is moved.” Ibid. 6 “A property’s design reflects historic functions and technologies as well as aesthetics. It includes such considerations as the structural system; massing; arrangement of spaces; pattern of fenestration; textures and colors of surface materials; type, amount, and style of ornamental detailing; and arrangement and type of plantings in a designed landscape.” Ibid. 7 National Register Bulletin 15, page 45. 8 “The choice and combination of materials reveals the preferences of those who created the property and indicated the availability of particular types of materials and technologies. Indigenous materials are often the focus of regional building traditions and thereby help define an area’s sense of time and place.” Ibid. 9 “Workmanship can apply to the property as a whole or to its individual components. It can be expressed in vernacular methods of construction and plain finishes or in highly sophisticated configurations and ornamental detailing. In can be based on common traditions or innovative period techniques.” Ibid. 8 • Association is the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property.11 In assessing a property’s integrity, the National Register criteria recognize that properties change over time; therefore, it is not necessary for a property to retain all its historic physical features or characteristics. The property must, however, retain the essential physical features that enable it to convey its historic identity.12 For properties that are considered significant under National Register criteria A and B, National Register Bulletin 15 states that a property that is significant for its historic association is eligible if it retains the essential physical features that made up its character or appearance during the period of its association with the important event, historical pattern, or person(s).13 In assessing the integrity of properties that are considered significant under National Register criterion C, National Register Bulletin 15 provides that a property important for illustrating a particular architectural style or construction technique must retain most of the physical features that constitute that style or technique.14 The primary effects of listing in the National Register on private property owners of historic buildings is the availability of financial and tax incentives.15 In addition, for projects that receive federal funding, the NHPA Section 106 clearance process (published at 36 CFR Part 800) must be completed. State and local laws and regulations may apply to properties listed in the National Register. For example, demolition or inappropriate alteration of National Register eligible or listed properties may be subject to CEQA. B. STATE LEVEL The California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), as an office of the California Department of Parks and Recreation, implements the policies of the NHPA on a statewide level. The OHP also carries out the duties as set forth in the Public Resources Code (PRC) and maintains the California Historical Resources Inventory. The State Historic Preservation Officer 10 “It results from the presence of physical features that, taken together, convey the property’s historic character.” Ibid. 11 “A property retains association if it is the place where the event or activity occurred and is sufficiently intact to convey that relationship to the observer. Like feeling, associations require the presence of physical features that convey a property’s historic character…Because feeling and association depend on individual perceptions, their retention alone is never sufficient to support eligibility of a property for the National Register.” Ibid. 12 National Register Bulletin 15, page 46. 13 Ibid. 14 “A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, patter of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basic features conveying massing but has lost the majority of features that once characterized its style.” Ibid. 15 See 36 CFR 60.2(b) (c). 9 (SHPO) is an appointed official who implements historic preservation programs within the state’s jurisdictions. 1. California Register of Historical Resources Created by Assembly Bill 2881, which was signed into law on September 27, 1992, the California Register is “an authoritative listing and guide to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens in identifying the existing historical resources of the state and to indicate which resources deserve to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change.”16 The criteria for eligibility for the California Register are based upon National Register criteria.17 Certain resources are determined by the statute to be automatically included in the California Register, including California properties formally determined eligible for, or listed in, the National Register.18 The California Register consists of resources that are listed automatically and those that must be nominated through an application and public hearing process. The California Register automatically includes the following: • California properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and those formally determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places; • California Registered Historical Landmarks from No. 770 onward; • Those California Points of Historical Interest that have been evaluated by the OHP and have been recommended to the State Historical Resources Commission for inclusion in the California Register.19 Other resources which may be nominated to the California Register include: • Individual historical resources; • Historical resources contributing to historic districts; • Historical resources identified as significant in historical resources surveys with significance ratings of Category 1 through 5; • Historical resources designated or listed as local landmarks, or designated under any local ordinance, such as a historic preservation overlay zone.20 To be eligible for the California Register, a historic resource must be significant at the local, state, or national level under one or more of the following four criteria: 16 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(a). 17 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(b). 18 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(d). 19 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(d). 20 California Public Resources Code § 5024.1(e). 10 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Additionally, a historic resource eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one or more of the criteria of significance described above and retain enough of its historic character or appearance to be recognizable as a historic resource and to convey the reasons for its significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing.21 Integrity under the California Register is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. The resource must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which it is proposed for eligibility. It is possible that a historic resource may not retain sufficient integrity to meet criteria for listing in the National Register, but it may still be eligible for listing in the California Register.22 2. California Office of Historical Preservation Survey Methodology The evaluation instructions and classification system prescribed by the California OHP in its Instructions for Recording Historical Resources provide a three-digit evaluation rating code for use in classifying potential historical resources. The first digit indicates one of the following general seven evaluation categories for use in conducting cultural resources surveys: 1. Listed in the National Register or the California Register; 2. Determined eligible for listing in the National Register or the California Register; 3. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through survey evaluation; 4. Appears eligible for the National Register or the California Register through other evaluation; 5. Recognized as Historically Significant by Local Government; 6. Not eligible for any Listing or Designation; and 7. Not evaluated for the National Register or California Register or needs re-evaluation. The second digit of the evaluation status code is a letter code indicating whether the resource is separately eligible (S), eligible as part of a district (D), or both (B). The third digit is a number that is used to further specify significance and refine the relationship of the property to 21 California Code of Regulations, California Register of Historical Resources (Title 14, Chapter11.5), Section 4852(c). 22 Ibid. 11 the National Register and/or California Register. Under this evaluation system, categories 1 through 4 pertain to various levels of National Register eligibility. The California Register, however, may include surveyed resources with evaluation rating codes through level 5. In addition, properties found ineligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, or for designation under a local ordinance are given an evaluation status code of 6. 12 III. EVALUATION A. HISTORIC CONTEXT 1. Anaheim The community of Anaheim began as a settlement of German farmers and grape growers who came to the area in the mid-1800s. The town of Anaheim was built on a parcel of 200 acres surveyed by George Hanson, one of the colonies founding members. The town activities were primarily associated with the growing of orange and lemons trees after it was found that these crops thrived in the southern California soil and weather. The population of the town grew steadily over the years with 1,456 residents in 1900, to 2,658 residents in 1910.23 This jump of almost 85% every ten years held until the influx of new residents after the close of World War II. 2. Post World War II (1945 to 1965) In 1950, the population of Anaheim had risen to 14,556 residents. The city was still mostly agriculturally based, with citrus ranches and groves covering the majority of the land outside of the city center. Then, in the early 1950’s, Walt Disney decided to construct his new amusement park in Anaheim. Construction of the Disneyland was announced in 1954.24 Anaheim not only drew thousands of new residents to staff the park, but simultaneously, the area also became a “bedroom” community for employees of the aeronautic and manufacturing industries in Long Beach, Wilmington, Torrance, and El Segundo. By 1960, the population of Anaheim had grown over 600% to 104,184 residents. New houses were being built in the thousands within housing tracts to create homes for the families moving into the area. To meet the shopping needs of Orange County residents, strip malls, department stores, restaurants, and automobile dealerships were popping up along all the major roadways, and near freeway exits. 3. McCoy Ford The 1924 Voter Registration Roll for Los Angeles County notes that 21-year-old Elton Revelon “Bus” McCoy, and 22-year-old William Arlee Mills were operating an “oil station business” that year, and were rooming together at 3811 West Washington Boulevard, in the City of Los Angeles.25 That was the same year that W. Arlee Mills’ sister, Adalene M. Mills married Elton R. McCoy, thereby making the two friends brothers-in-law as well. By 1928, the Los Angeles County voter registration information for McCoy and Mills had been updated to 23 U.S. Census Records for Anaheim, CA. 24 “History of Anaheim: The 1950s-1960s”. https://www.anaheim.net/156/The-1950s---1980s 25 Los Angeles County Voter Registration Roll, 1924 for “Elton R. McCoy” and “William A. Mills”. Accessed by Ancestry.com 13 state that both McCoy and Mills were now the proprietors/owners of the gas station business in the City of Los Angeles.26 Mills was also married by 1930, and the United States Census of 1930 recorded that Mills had moved to Fullerton, and was a “Ford Dealer”, while McCoy was still living in Los Angeles, and was running a “Service Station”.27 Within just a year, the Orange County City Directory of 1931 noted that McCoy and Mills had established the McCoy & Mills Ford Tire & Tractor Company at 125 Commonwealth Avenue in Fullerton, and both families were living in Fullerton as well.28/29 As they were in the business of selling and repairing the most popular and plentiful Ford brand of automobile in the Unites States, the men appeared to be weathering the effects of the Great Depression, and had been able to purchase homes in Fullerton. At the end of the decade, the Mills and McCoy had expanded their businesses to have the McCoy Ford Car and Tractor dealership at 320 North Anaheim Boulevard, in Anaheim, and the McCoy & Mills dealership (selling Ford, Zephyr, and Mercury automobiles) at 125 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton.30/31 Mills was managing the McCoy & Mills dealership in Fullerton, and McCoy managed the McCoy Ford dealership in Anaheim. By the early 1960s, it was apparent that McCoy Ford had outgrown its available space on Anaheim Boulevard, and the decision was made to move westward to a larger site at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (Figures 4 and 5) to house the new car showroom, new and used car lots, repair and service facilities, and collision repair services. The new McCoy Ford dealership opened for business in late 1965 (Figures 6 and 7). Over the 40+ years of their partnership, McCoy and Mills had created two very successful Ford dealerships in Orange County. The businesses were managed by the families after Mills died in 1967, and McCoy died in 1968. McCoy Ford in Anaheim became a McCoy & Mills Ford dealership in 1980, and was closed for business in 2014. The previous Ford showroom area now houses a Hertz [Used] Car Sales operation, with the other support buildings currently being occupied by Mills Collision Center (operated by a grandson of W. Arlee Mills), RV Service Solutions, and Miranda Detail Service. 26 Los Angeles County Voter Registration Roll, 1930 for “Elton R. McCoy” and “William A. Mills”. Accessed by Ancestry.com 27 U.S. Census for 1930, “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 28 McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ 29 Orange County Directory for Fullerton, 1931; “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 30 McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ 31 Orange County Directory for Fullerton, 1939; “Elton R. McCoy” and “W. Arlee Mills”. Accessed from Ancestry.com. 14 Figure 4: Advertisement in the Los Angeles Times, June 1965. 15 Figure 5: Los Angeles Times, December 1965. 16 Figure 6: Aerial view of the future site of McCoy Ford in 1953. (Source: NETR Historic Aerials) Figure 7: Aerial view of McCoy Ford in 1972. (Source: NETR Historic Aerials) 17 B. HISTORIC RESOURCES IDENTIFIED A site visit and intensive-level inspection of the built-environment resources at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, was performed by Pamela Daly, Architectural Historian, on March 26, 2019. The property, which had been the site of McCoy Ford from 1965 to 2014, is now comprised of four independent commercial businesses located on the property within Buildings 1, 2, 3, and 4 as shown below (Figure 8)32. The four businesses are Hertz Car Sales (Building 1), Miranda Detail (Building 2), Mills Collision Center (Building 1 and Building 3), and RV Service Solutions (Building 4). The buildings and structures on the site were surveyed for evaluation of historical significance. Figure 8: Aerial view of 1600 West Lincoln Avenue with individual buildings. Based on a small number of original drawings of the McCoy Ford dealership buildings, now in the possession of Ron Mills (grandson of W. Arlee Mills), it was revealed that the main showroom building was designed by Maxwell David Jadlli, A.I.A. of Techline Designs, which was 32 The numbers assigned for each building are for the purposes of this study, and do not correlate to the building numbers noted on the original drawings. Bldg 2 Bldg 1 Bldg 3 Bldg 4 18 located in South Gate. Jadlli had been born in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 1929, with the given name of Maxwell David Livschitz, which he changed to Maxwell David Jadlli when he moved to the United States in 1958.33 Jadlli is listed in the American Institute of Architects (A.I.A.) Directory for 1972, but the listing contains only his name and address, and no information about any projects he had worked on in the United States. Although Jadlli appears to have been primarily employed on projects in the Los Angeles area, his name appears in only a handful of articles in the Los Angeles Times archives, with only two of the Times articles about architectural projects. A Times article in March of 1981, presents Jadlli as an early convert to using computer-aided design and graphics for creating architectural drawings, and his presentation at a local A.I.A. meeting.34 While the showroom building (Building 1) appears to have designed by Los Angeles architect Maxwell Jadlli, the three other automobile-associated buildings (Buildings 2, 3, 4) were designed and constructed using Butler Manufacturing Company’s pre-fabricated steel frames, structural members, siding, and roofing. The steel framing members used primarily in the open-bay service structures would have been shipped to the site from Butler’s headquarters in Kansas City, Missouri. To create the concrete-masonry unit walls of the service buildings, the blocks would have been purchased locally, and the walls constructed under building specifications provided by Butler Manufacturing Company engineers/designers to tie in with the their steel frame systems. Building 1: This International style building was used primarily as the indoor showroom for the new cars, but also provided office space for the new car salesmen, the new car sales manager, and finance/warranty/auto loan manager (Figure 9). The southern portion of the building would have provided space for additional administrative support services (Figure 10). The building is one-story, has a rectangular-massing, and a flat roof system. The building was constructed on a slight grade (upwards to the south), so that the main showroom floor is at a higher elevation than West Lincoln Avenue. Drivers and passengers passing on West Lincoln Avenue would be able to see the cars on the showroom floor, and also those cars outside, surrounding the showroom building since the dealership buildings were easily visible from West Lincoln Avenue. The enclosed showroom floor portion of the building is a simple structure comprised of the showroom space walled-in on three sides by curtain-glass walls, and covered by a flat roof with wide overhanging eaves, convex-shaped fascia, and supported by steel beam columns. The curtain glass walls facing west, north, and east, set well under the roof and create a “glass display box” for the cars to be seen by the passing drivers. There is an “open air” showroom area that is situated outside of the east wall of the enclosed showroom area, under an extension of the main roof. The glass-walled and “open air” showroom areas of the building have a footprint of approximately 4,300 square feet (sf). 33 United States Petition for Naturalization for Maxwell David Jadlli, May 24, 1959. Accessed at Ancestry.com. 34 Los Angeles Times. “AIA Session to Feature Computer Designing”, March 22, 1981. 19 The portion of the building south of the showroom area, which contained the administrative and support services of the dealership, has an upside-down “U” massing, and has a footprint of approximately 6,833 sf. This portion of the building is walled almost entirely d by concrete-masonry block walls with occasional window or door openings. A 25-foot wide, flat roof awing structure supported by round steel columns spans from the rear of the showroom building, south to the RV Services (Building 4) across the customer driveways to the service areas of the property. Figure 9: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, main showroom. View looking southeast. Figure 10: Rear (south) elevation of the main showroom building. Covered walkway connects to the RV Services building (Building 4). View looking northeast. 20 Building 2: The building was constructed in 1965. It is a steel frame building from Butler Manufacturing Company that was assembled on site, and it features six separate bays within a rectangular-massed structure (Figure 11). The building measures approximately 143 feet long by 24 feet wide, is set on an east-west axis, and it has a low-pitch shed roof. The roof and sidewalls are clad with steel panels, and the steel support beams that frame the building are set in a poured concrete foundation. At some point in time, concrete-masonry unit wall was built along the north elevation of the shed-roof structure, and a 14-foot wide modular office unit was attached to the north elevation of the wall and shed-roof structure. The modular unit provided office space for the dealership’s used car operations. Figure 11: Building 2 with the detailing service bays. View looking northwest. Building 3: The building was constructed in 1965. It is a rectangular-massed, steel frame building with a low pitch gable roof set on a north-south axis, which was ordered from Butler Manufacturing Company and assembled on site. Except for the space used for an office at the northwest corner of the building, the structure has open stalls/bays for the service of automobiles and other types of motor vehicles (Figure 12). The main building was augmented with the addition of a flat roofed shed structure, built with steel support beams and steel wall panels on its west wall (Figure 13). The roof of the shed structure is attached to the main building under its eaves, and the shed was installed to provide additional covered work space for the body shop facilities. The main building measures approximately 70 feet wide by 245 feet long, and the additional shed measures 35 feet wide by 120 feet long. 21 Figure 12: Building 3 with repair and collision bays. View looking southwest. Figure 13: Additional covered area of Building 3. View looking south. Building 4: The building was constructed in 1965, and is comprised of a two-story, concrete- masonry unit, commercial building with a one-story, Butler Manufacturing Company service bay building attached to the south elevation of the concrete block structure. The concrete block portion of the building measures approximately 50 feet wide by 125 feet long, and the attached Butler Manufacturing Company building measures 62 feet wide by 120 feet long (Figures 14 and 15). Both the concrete-block structure and Butler building are rectangular-massed buildings with low-pitch gable roofs set on a north-south axis. A one-story, shed roof, T-111 sided utility building, measuring approximately 50 feet wide by 15 feet long by 15 feet tall, is attached to the south end of the service bay structure. 22 Figure 14: Building 4 with RV Services. View looking southwest. Figure 15: Service bays of Building 4. View looking northeast. C. SIGNIFICANCE The property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, has buildings and structures that were constructed over 50 years ago. Below, we will evaluate the property under federal and state criteria for significance as a historical resource. “Bus” McCoy had built a Ford dealership on Anaheim Boulevard in 1930, but by the early 1960s he knew that a larger automobile dealership complex was needed to meet the 23 needs of his existing service customers, and to allow him to expand his sales department. McCoy Ford was built in 1965 on a 5+ acre lot in the western outskirts of Anaheim. Under Criterion A of the National Register, and Criterion 1 of the California Register, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue does not appear to have been associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history in Anaheim, Orange County, or California. The McCoy Ford dealership had been built in 1965 on land previously occupied by residential buildings that had been surrounded by acres of citrus groves. With the population and associated housing boom in Southern California after the end of World War II, the acres of citrus trees were replaced by housing tracts, strip malls, shopping centers, all connected by a vastly expanded highway system. Choosing to build the new McCoy Ford dealership on West Lincoln Avenue was merely a move to expand the company’s sales and service potential as Anaheim’s commercial/retail center grew westward. McCoy Ford was not Anaheim’s first automobile dealership, nor was it a facility that contributed to the history of Ford brand automobiles in Orange County or California. The property has not made a significant contribution to the local, regional, or national history, and does not appear eligible for listing as a historical resource in the National Register or California Register. Under the criterion for evaluating properties for listing in the National Register or California Register for their association with the lives of persons important to the history of Anaheim, California, or the United States, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue does not appear eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B, or the California Register under Criterion 2. We could find no evidence that Elton R. McCoy, or any other individuals associated with the property, was a person identified as having a direct effect on the history of Ford brand automobiles or the City of Anaheim. Criterion C of the National Register, and Criterion 3 the California Register, was used to evaluate the possible significance of the architecture, design, or construction of the built- environment resources at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue. It is apparent that the automobile showroom building was designed by Mathew Jadlli as a modest interpretation of International style architecture. The showroom building used the architectural feature of curtain glass walls, which had been incorporated into residential and commercial buildings in the United States since the late 1930s, as a method of displaying the automobiles for sale. Important residential examples of the use of curtain glass walls include The Glass House (1949) by architect Phillip Johnson, the A. Conger Goodyear House (1938) by architect Edward Durrell Stone, and the Farnsworth House (1951) by architect Miles van de Rohe. Although automobile dealerships were standalone retail display structures, their purpose was no different than how department stores, banks, hotels, and motels were designed after World War II by using large areas of glass to display the products within the building, or entice the customers to come inside for a closer look. Whether it was Ford, Chevrolet, or even Volkswagen, almost all dealerships in the 1960s built dealership buildings in some variation of International style architecture, and these can 24 still be found in cities across the United States.35 There was no important aspect of design, or element of architectural detailing contributed by the architect, that caused the McCoy Ford showroom building to rise above the norm. Buildings 2, 3, and 4, that were designed and fabricated by Butler Manufacturing Company, for McCoy Ford at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, do not appear to have involved any innovative aspects of engineering design, or use of steel construction materials, to be considered significant resources. The built-environment resources on the subject property have retained a majority of their original aspects of physical integrity. These aspects include the location of the buildings within the dealership and the dealership itself in Anaheim; the architectural and engineering design of the buildings; the materials used in construction of the buildings; the workmanship applied in the construction of the buildings; the property’s association with the sales and service of motor vehicles, and the setting of the property on West Lincoln Avenue. Because the buildings, associated with the construction of the dealership in 1965 are so ubiquitous and plentiful throughout the nation, they are not able to convey a strong sense of feeling to the specific era of the late 1960s. The property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue has not yielded, nor does it appear to have the potential to yield, information important to the history of the local area, California or the nation. The property does not appear eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion D, or the California Register under Criterion 4. To summarize, the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue and the buildings therein, home of the McCoy Ford dealership from 1965 to 2014, does not meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or California Register as a historical resource. For purposes of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), the property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue is assigned California Historical Resource Status Code 6Z, to represent a property that has been found ineligible for listing in the National Register or California Register through survey evaluation. 35 The author of this report worked in the automotive industry in Ithaca, New York, in the 1970s, and can attest to the modest interpretations of the International style of architecture used to design the dealerships in a small town of 30,000. IV. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ancestry.com. U.S. Census data for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Los Angeles County Voter Registration data for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Los Angeles City Directory for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Ancestry.com. Orange County City Directory for “Elton R. McCoy”, “W. Arlee Mills”, “Maxwell D. Jadlli”. Accessed April 20, 2019. Butler Manufacturing Company. “About Us”; https://www.butlermfg.com/about/ Los Angeles Times. “AIA Session to Feature Computer Designing”, March 22, 1981. McCoy Mills Ford; “About Us”. https://www.mccoymillsford.com/ Mills, Ron. Interview with Mr. Mills, March 26, 2019. NETR Historic Aerials: http://www.historicaerials.com/ Office of State Historic Preservation. California Historic Resources Inventory, Survey Workbook (excerpts). State of California: Sacramento, 1986. Parker, Patricia L. National Register Bulletin 24, “Guidelines for Local Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning.” Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1985. United States Department of the Interior. National Register Bulletin 15, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” Washington, DC: National Park Service, Interagency Resources Division, rev. 1991. United States Department of the Interior. Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms, National Register Bulletin 16. Washington, DC: National Park Service, September 30, 1986. V. INVENTORY SITE FORMS (DPR SERIES 523) Will be delivered at acceptance of Draft Report 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix D Geotechnical Due-Diligence Evaluation, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., October 2018 October 9, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Subject: Response to City of Anaheim Review Comments, OTH2018-01082, Proposed Multi- Family Residential Development and Parking garage, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California. Reference: First Review Comments Pertaining to the Referenced Report for the Proposed Multi- Family Development & Parking Garage at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, OTH 2018-01082, Dated/Stamped by the Public Works Engineering on July 23, 2018, prepared by CEM Lab, dated August 13, 2018 (File No. CEM2018- 119). Geotechnical Due-Diligence Evaluation, Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking garage, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, prepared by Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., dated October 6, 2018 (J.N.: 2623.00). Dear Mr. Haskins, We are pleased to provide you with our responses to the comments by the city of Anaheim’s consultant during their review of our referenced report. A copy of the review comments is attached herein for your reference. Our responses to the comments are provided below. Comment 1: The information presented in the referenced report is intended only for preliminary feasibility, planning and budgetary evaluation. It is not intended to satisfy the requirements of a site specific and detailed geotechnical investigation required for further planning and permitting. Please acknowledge. Response 1: Acknowledged. Similar language was included in the first paragraph of Section 1.1 of our referenced report. Development Advisors, LLC October 9, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Page 2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Comment 2: Referring to pages 4 & 5 under section 3.3. Table 3.1 presents a summary of all the known seismically active faults within 10 miles. However, under the section 5.2 in page 6, the closest known active fault is reported to be Whittier Fault located about 8.5 miles northeast from the site which contradicts information contained in Table 3.1. In fact, Whittier Fault is not included in Table 3.1. Please clarify. Response 2: The U.S.G.S database information presented in Table 3.1 is a discussion of faults capable of producing ground motion. The fault information presented in Table 3.1 includes the Whittier fault as being a segment of the northwestern extension of the much larger Elsinore Fault System. For clarification, “Elsinore;W” presented in the fourth row of Table 3.1 represents only Whittier fault segment of the overall Elsinore Fault System. The southerly continuation of the Elsinore fault system is subdivided into specific section depending on locale, such as Glen Ivy (GI) segment, Temecula segment (T), etc. In Section 5.2.1 of our report, we refer specifically to the Whittier fault (unassociated with the Elsinore Fault System) as commonly referred to in the local southern California region. The closest known active fault (capable of ground rupture) distance provided in Section 5.2.1 was an approximate measurement from the site to the surface trace of the Whittier fault as presented on the California Geological Survey, Earthquake Fault Zone map. Comment 3: Referring to page 3 under Section 2.2, a total of two (2) percolation tests were performed by the consultant. Reportedly, Boring B-1 and B-4 was utilized for percolation tests upon completion of soil sampling. The details and results of percolation tests were not made available to us. Please provide the test results and specify the method utilized for establishing design infiltration rate. Also, provide the procedures and calculations applied to determine infiltration rate from percolation tests. We understand, more testing will be necessary once the location and invert elevation of the proposed BMP is determined. Response 3: A report of our infiltration study for proposed Water Quality Improvements was presented under separate cover. A copy of this report is included with this response. Comment 4: In reference to the laboratory test program in Appendix B, the Direct Shear Test in Plate No. B-2 missing the essential data such as internal friction angle and cohesion. Response 4: A revised copy of Plate B-2 is attached herein, and now includes friction angles and cohesion values for both Peak and Ultimate conditions. Development Advisors, LLC October 9, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Page 3 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Comment 5: Referring to the laboratory test program in Appendix B, the consolidation test results in Plate No. B- 3. It is unlikely for a soil sample with an initial dry density of 131.8 pcf to consolidate over 8.0%. It also contradict the data at depth 5 ft in Boring B-2. Therefore, we believe the laboratory test is erroneous. Response 5: The initial dry density of 131.8 pcf indicated on Plate No. B-3 was inadvertently reported in error. A corrected copy of Plate No. B-3 is attached herein. Comment 6: Please provide an actual size updated legible geotechnical map to scale, utilizing the current grading plan for the project and clearly show (at a minimum) a) the existing site topography, b) proposed structures/improvements, c) proposed finish grade, geologic units, contacts etc. d) the locations of the subsurface exploration, and, e) the locations of the proposed structures/improvements superimposed over previous structures. Response 6: The purpose of our referenced geotechnical due-diligence evaluation report for the subject property was intended to evaluate the feasibility of proposed site development for preliminary planning purposes only. The supplemental information requested by the reviewer in Comment 6 will be addressed during preparation of a design-level geotechnical report subsequent to our review of detailed construction drawings that were not available at the time of our due-diligence study. Comment 7: Consistent with the geotechnical map per comment 6, please specify the depth of removal for uncertified fill including loose or disturbed soil caused by site cleanup per requirements of Phase II ESA. Please discuss and provide supporting evidence if the remedial earthwork after the site cleanup was properly documented. Response 7: The purpose of our referenced geotechnical due-diligence evaluation report for the subject property was intended to evaluate the feasibility of proposed site development for preliminary planning purposes only. The supplemental information requested by the reviewer in Comment 7 will be addressed during preparation of a design-level geotechnical report subsequent to our review of the Phase II report and our review of detailed construction drawings that were not available at the time of our due-diligence study. Comment 8: Provide recommendations for shoring, underpinning, and sequence of construction in the event that any excavation would remove lateral support to the public way, adjacent property or an existing structure. A plot plan and cross-section(s) showing the construction type, number of stories, and location of the structures adjacent to the excavation shall be part of the excavation plans. Development Advisors, LLC October 9, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Page 4 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Response 8: The purpose of our referenced geotechnical due-diligence evaluation report for the subject property was intended to evaluate the feasibility of proposed site development for preliminary planning purposes only. The supplemental information requested by the reviewer in Comment 8 will be addressed during preparation of a design-level geotechnical report subsequent to our review of detailed construction drawings that were not available at the time of our due-diligence study. CLOSING We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul Hyun Jin Kim Patrick M. Keefe Associate Engineer Principal Engineering Geologist GE 3106 CEG 2022 Attachments: First Review Comments Pertaining to the Referenced Report for the Proposed Multi- Family Development & Parking Garage at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, OTH 2018-01082, Dated/Stamped by the Public Works Engineering on July 23, 2018, prepared by CEM Lab, dated August 13, 2018 (File No. CEM2018- 119). Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi-Family Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Prepared by Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., dated May 8, 2018 (J.N.: 2623.00). Direct Shear Test, Plate B-2 Consolidation Test Results, Plate B-3 Job No: Plate No: B-2DIRECT SHEAR SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION B-5 @ 0-5 feet Remolded @ 90% of 121.5 pcf @ 12%Silty Sand (SM) Strain Rate (in/min)0.01 Initial Moisture Content (%)13.8 13.8 13.8 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 107.6 107.6 107.6 Ultimate Displacement (in)0.25 0.25 0.25 Ultimate Shear Stress (ksf)0.636 1.128 2.208 Peak Displacement (in)0.008 0.005 0.01 Peak Shear Stress (ksf)0.72 1.296 2.256 Normal Stress (ksf)1 2 4 1 2 3Specimen No. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 NORMAL STRESS (ksf) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 SH E A R S T R E S S ( k s f ) 0246810 Axial Strain (%) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) 0246810 Axial Strain (%) -0.025 0.000 0.025 Ve r t i c a l D i s p l a c e m e n t ( i n . ) 1 2 4 Strain Legend Peak Strength Legend Ultimate Sample Location: CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Sample Depth: Classification: Initial Dry Density (pcf): Initial Moisure Content (%): Final Moisture Content (%): Job No: Plate No: B-3 100 1000 10000 100000 NORMAL STRESS (psf) 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 CO N S O L I D A T I O N ( % ) 5 ft B-2 ML 100.4 19.8 21.9 2623.00 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix E Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc., May 2018 May 8, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Subject: Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi- Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California. Dear Mr. Haskins, Pursuant to your request, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. has completed an infiltration study for proposed water quality improvements. The scope of this investigation consisted of the following: Exploratory drilling, soil sampling and test well installation Field percolation testing Laboratory testing of selected soil samples Engineering analysis of the data Preparation of this report SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Location and Description The site is located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, within the city of Anaheim, California. The property is irregular in shape and comprises approximately 5.3 acres of land. The location of the site is depicted on Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by an auto dealership with an auto mechanics shop. The site is bordered by West Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, Loara Elementary School, a single family residence, and commercial development to the south, and a multi-family residential community to the west. At the time of this evaluation, the southern portion of the site was occupied by two buildings that house an automotive body shop and RV repair facility; the northern portion of the site is currently occupied by a used car dealership. A paved parking lot occupies the remainder of the property. Free standing walls were located along the perimeter of the property except on the northern portion of the site. The north is bordered by planters and sidewalks. The site is relatively level with elevations, based on GoogleEarth 2018, varying from approximately 129 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 135 feet above MSL. Drainage at the site appears to be directed as sheet flow towards the east within the southern portion of the site and to the north within the norther portion. Vegetation at the site consists of a few palm trees and shrubs along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. © 2017 Google SITE LOCATION MAP N The Olson Company Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1 SITE Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 3 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Development We understand the site will be developed for residential use. We anticipate the proposed site development will consist of 35 three-story townhomes and either a four- or five-story apartment building with a six- to seven-level parking structure. We also anticipate that all proposed structures will be constructed on grade (i.e. no subterranean elements). Associated interior driveways, perimeter/retaining walls, underground utilities and a storm water infiltration system are also anticipated. No grading or structural plans were available in preparing of this report. However, we anticipate that minor rough grading of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect the proposed residential dwellings will be wood-framed structures with concrete slabs on grade yielding relatively light foundation loads. The multi-level parking structure is anticipated to be a concrete and masonry block supported by conventional foundations. SUMMARY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK Subsurface Investigation Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on July 18, 2017, and consisted of drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 15 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-stem-auger drill rig. Representatives of Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings. Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling. Borings B-1 and B-4 were converted into percolation test wells (P-1 and P-2) at the completion of drilling. Two-inch-diameter casings were installed in each boring for subsequent percolation testing. The locations of the percolation wells are depicted on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Well screens having a length of approximately 10 feet where installed at the bottom of the percolation wells with solid pipe extending the remainder of the distance to the ground surface. The annular space of the well screen sections was filled with sand. Subsequent to completion of testing, the well casings were removed and the boring was refilled with drill cuttings. Percolation Testing Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 4 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation testing was performed on July 18, 2017, in general conformance with the constant-head test procedures outlined in the referenced Well Permeameter Method (USBR 7300-89). A water hose attached to a water source on site was connected to an inline flow meter to measure the water flow. The flow meter is capable of measuring flow rates up to 10 gallons per minute and as low as 0.1 gallons per minute. A valve was connected in line with the flow meter to control the flow rate. A filling hose was used to connect the flow meter and the test wells. Water was introduced by the filling hose near the bottom of the test wells. A water level meter with 1/100-foot divisions was used to measure the depths to water surface from the top of well casings. Flow to the wells was terminated upon either completion of testing of all the pre-determined water levels or the flow rate exceeded the maximum capacity of the flow meter. Measurements obtained during the percolation testing are provided on Plates C-1 and C-2. Laboratory Testing Selected soil samples of representative earth materials were tested to assist in the formulation of conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. Tests consisted of grain-size analysis. Laboratory testing relevant to percolation characteristics are presented in Appendix B. ANALYSIS OF DATA Subsurface Conditions The subsurface soils observed within the site are comprised of up to approximately 4 feet of artificial fill overlying alluvial deposits. The artificial fill is comprised of loose to medium dense silty sand. The alluvial deposits are comprised of loose to dense interlayers of silty sand and sand with variable amounts of gravel. Some discontinuous layers and lenses comprised of sandy silt were occasionally observed within the alluvium. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface explorations to a maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. A review of the CDMG Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03 indicates that historical high groundwater levels for the general site area have been estimated to be greater than 50 feet below the existing ground surface. Based on the referenced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report for the property, the groundwater depth is inferred to be approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) based on the subsurface investigation conducted on a nearby property (1631 West Lincoln Avenue and Closed Case #083004014T). Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 5 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation Data Analyses were performed to evaluate permeability using the flow rate obtained at the end of the constant-head stage of field percolation testing for the data obtained from percolation test well P-1 and P-2. These analyses were performed in accordance with the procedures provided in the referenced USBR method as presented on Plates C-4 through C-6 and summarized below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Summary of Back-Calculated Permeability Coefficient from Constant Head Test Location Total Depth of Well (ft) Depth to Water in Well (ft) Height of Water in Well (ft) Static Flow Rate (gal./min.) Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr.) P-1 (B-1) 25 20 5 2.0 3.27 P-2 (B-4) 15 13.5 1.5 6.25 68.23 Using the Kozeny-Carman equation, we estimated permeability rates based on laboratory testing consisting of particle-size analyses. The estimated permeability based on correlations with particle- size analyses are summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Estimated Permeability Coefficient Based on Gradation Location USCS Classification Depth (ft) Dry unit weight (pcf) Specific Gravity Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr) B-1 SM 20 - 2.65 2.71 B-4 SP 10 99.1 2.65 61.6 Design of Dry Well Infiltration in a dry well was modeled using the software Seep/W, version 2007, by Geo-Slope International. The program allows for modeling of both partially-saturated and saturated porous medium using a finite element approach to solve Darcy’s Law. The program can evaluate both steady- state and transient flow in planer and axisymmetric cases. Boundaries of the model can be identified with various conditions including fix total head, fix pressure head, fix flow rate, and head as a function of flow. Soil conductivity properties can be modeled with either Fredlund et al (1994), Green and Corey (1971), or Van Genuchten (1980). The Van Genuchten parameters were selected for use in our models and were based on test results of particle-size analyses and estimated in-place densities. The saturated conductivities for the infiltration zones were selected based on the results obtained from back-calculation of the percolation tests. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 6 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Seep/W model was setup with the bottom of the dry well at a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. The total depth of the dry well was assumed to be 6 feet in diameter and contain a settling chamber 18 feet in depth, have an inside diameter of 4 feet, and an outside diameter of 4.5 feet. Annular space around the chamber and below the chamber is assumed to consist of gravel. A more detailed model of the dry well design can be found on Plate 2. The model consisted of three zones of material to represent the general soil profile. The upper zone (Material # 1) was modeled to be relatively impermeable to represent artificial fill and to ignore contributions from this layer. The second zone (Material No. 2) was modeled to represent the poorly- graded sands encountered during our subsurface investigation that extend to the depth of 17 feet near Borings 1 and 4. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back-analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. The conductivity of the bottom zone (Material No. 3) was modeled to represent the interbedded sands and silty sands that were encountered during our subsurface investigation below a depth of 17 feet. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back- analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. A summary of the properties for each zone is provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Characteristic Curve Parameters Material No. Depth (ft) USCS Ks (in/hr) Van Genuchten Parameters a (1/cm) n m Sat. Water Content Residual Water Content 1 Impermeable Soils 0.001 0.0001 1.22 0.18 0.42 0.01 2 Sand 50.0 59.63 1.25 0.20 0.31 0.025 3 Silty Sand & Sand 3.0 3.00 1.36 0.27 0.33 0.025 Steady state analyses were performed to estimate the maximum inflow that a well can accommodate. The water head was set at 5 feet below the ground surface in the well. Using the well configuration described above, we obtain a peak static total flow of 0.29 ft³/sec. A plot depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors for the model are provided on Plate C-5. To evaluate the time required to empty the well once no more water is introduced, the model was reanalyzed with a variable head condition that was dependent upon the volume of water leaving the well. As water infiltrates into the surrounding soil, the volume of water remaining in the well is reduced as well as the resulting water head. A graph of the well head versus exit volume for the well configuration is provided in Figure 2. The function assumes a void ratio of 0.4 within the zones occupied by gravel. If some other well configuration is used, then the analyses will require updating. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 7 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Figure 2 –Well Head Function The analyses were performed as a transient case over a total time of approximately 4 hours. The water is evacuated from the chamber portion of the well in approximately 3 hours assuming the well utilizes a chamber 18 feet in depth. Plots depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors at selected times during the drawdown phase is provided in Appendix C on Plates C-6 through C-10. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on results of our testing, infiltration of storm water at the site is feasible using a shallow chamber system such as Stormtech chambers or dry wells. Recommendations pertinent to each type of system is provided below. The use of shallow chamber systems or dry wells is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction. As discussed above, the groundwater is approximately 100 feet deep and is anticipated to remain below a depth of 50 during the design life of the project. Therefore, chambers systems founded within the upper 10 feet and a dry well having a total depth of 20 will maintain the minimum clearance of 10 feet above groundwater as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Shallow System The infiltration rate of a shallow chamber system will be dependent upon the depth and width of the system as well as the depth of water contained in the chambers. For purposes of developing an infiltration rate, we have conservatively assumed a negligible ponding depth in the chambers. Since the soil profile consists of a higher permeability layer (SP) over a lower permeability layer (SM), the overall infiltration rate will depend essentially on the vertical clearance of the chamber bottom from the lower SM soil layer and the width of the system. We have assumed the infiltration rate can be 80 85 90 95 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 To t a l H e a d ( f t ) Volume (ft3) Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. estimated by using a weight average of the permeabilities of the upper SP layer with a permeability of 50 in/hr. and lower SM layer with a permeability of 3 in/hr. depending upon the depth and width of the system. The weighting is based on the giving full weight to the upper layer when the clearance is 3 times the system width. Where the clearance is less than 3 times the system width, the permeabilities are weighted according to the ratios of the permeabilities to 3 times the system width. The results of weighting of these two factors is summarized in Table 3 below. TABLE 3 Summary of Measured Infiltration Rates for Shallow Chamber Systems Depth to Bottom of Chamber System Width (ft) 6 ft 8 ft 10ft 10 20 in/hr. 17 in/hr. 14 in/hr. 20 12 in/hr. 10 in/hr. 9 in/hr. 30 9 in/hr. 8 in/hr. 7 in/hr. The system width should be based on the total minimum dimension across the chamber area regardless of how many individual chambers are used or the spacing between chambers. The project civil engineer should incorporate an appropriate factor of safety to the measured values indicated in Table 3 to develop the design infiltration rate. Excavation bottoms should be observed by the geotechnical consultant to verify that appropriate soils are present. Any soils that do not meet the anticipated minimum infiltration rate should be excavated and replaced with a granular material that meets or exceeds a permeability rate of 50 in./hr. Such a material may consist of a Caltrans Class II permeable base or other material approved by the geotechnical engineer. Chambers should be placed at least 20 feet horizontally from any building or property line. Once WQMP plans and calculations are developed, they should be reviewed by this office to confirm the intent of this report has been properly incorporated into the project. We also recommend that a representative of this office be present during construction to confirm the exposed soil conditions are as anticipated and to provide recommendations in the event they differ. Dry Well Results of our work indicate a storm water disposal system consisting of dry wells is feasible at the site. Based on results of percolation testing and analyses, a well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize an unfactored peak flow rate of 0.29 ft³/sec. in proximity to the infiltration test well locations (B-1 and B-4) indicated on Plate 1. An appropriate factor of safety should be applied to the flow rate as required by the governmental authority. Wells with differing diameters or lengths will result in differing infiltration rates. As such, this value should not be used for evaluation of other well configurations. The wells should be located at least 15 feet horizontally from any habitable structure or property line. Should you require multiple dry wells across the site, the wells should be spaced at least 70 feet, center Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 9 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. to center, to avoid cross influence. Provided the recommendations above are incorporated into the design of the drywell, permanent groundwater mounding is not anticipated to occur. The actual flow capacity of the dry well could be more or less than the estimated value. As such, provisions should be made to accommodate excess flow quantities in the event the dry well does not infiltrate the anticipated amount. The design also assumes that sediments will be removed from the inflowing water through an upper chamber or other device. Sediments that are allowed to enter the dry well will tend to degrade the flow capacity by plugging up the infiltration surfaces. In general, the dry well may consist of a concrete inner chamber surrounded by ½-inch open graded gravel. The concrete chamber should have perforations to allow the chamber to drain. The holes should be sized to prevent piping of the gravel into the chamber. A sand/cement slurry should be used as backfill outside the entire diameter of the drilled shaft within the upper 5 feet of the wells to restrict water from entering the upper 5 feet. A general diagram of the dry well is provided on Plate 2. In general, the dry well shaft is anticipated to be prone to sloughing and caving due to the layers of granular materials encountered during the subsurface investigation. We anticipate that casing will be required to install the well. Workers should not enter the shaft unless the excavation is laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements. The placement and compaction of backfill materials, including the gravel should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant. LIMITATIONS This report is based on the geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered in our boring excavations and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed representative of the project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observations by a geotechnical consultant during the construction phase of the storm water infiltration systems are essential to confirming the basis of this report. This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty. This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Development Advisors to assist the project consultants in the design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 10 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Principe David E. Albus Staff Engineer Principal Engineer G.E. 2455 Enclosures: Plate 1- Geotechnical Map Plate 2 – Typical Dry Well Exhibit Appendix A - Exploratory Logs Appendix B - Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Percolation Testing and Analyses Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES Publications California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Report 03, “Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California”, 1998. State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim and Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated April 17, 1997. Procedure for Performing Field Permeability Testing by the Well Permeameter Method, by United States Department of The Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR 7300-89). Saxton, K.E., W.J. Rawls, J.S. Romberger, and R.I. Papendick. 1986. Estimating generalized soil- water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50(4):1031-103 Reports Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 1600 West Lincoln, 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, City of Anaheim, California, prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., dated April 28, 2017 (Partner Project No. 16-177713.1). W. LINCOLN AVE. S. LOARA ST. P R O J E C T L I M I T B - 2 B-3 B - 6 B - 5 B - 1 / P - 1 B - 4 / P - 2 W. PAMPAS LN. A L B U S - K E E F E & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . G E O T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S G E O T E C H N I C A L M A P 2 6 2 3 . 0 0 J o b N o . : P l a t e : 1 D a t e : 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 8 Google 2017 E X P L A N A T I O N ( L o c a t i o n s A p p r o x i m a t e ) - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g B - 6 - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g & P e r c o l a t i o n T e s t B o r i n g B - 1 / P - 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 A P P R O X . S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 0 ' CALCULATINGMAXWELLIVREQUIREMENTS Thetypeofproperty,soilpermeability,rainfallintensityandlocaldrainageordinancesdeterminethenumberanddesignofMaxWellSystems.Forgeneralapplicationsdrainingretained stormwater, use one standard MaxWell IV per the instructions below for up to 3 acres of landscaped contributory area, and up to 1 acre of paved surface. For larger paved surfaces, subdivisiondrainage,nuisancewaterdrainage,connectingpipeslargerthan4"Øfromcatchbasinsorundergroundstorage,orotherdemandingapplications,refertoour MaxWell ®Plus System.Forindustrialdrainage,includinggasolineservicestations,our Envibro®System mayberecommended.Foradditionalconsiderations,pleasereferto “DesignSuggestionsFor RetentionAndDrainageSystems”orconsultourDesignStaff. COMPLETINGTHEMAXWELLIVDRAWING Toapplythe MaxWellIV drawingtoyourspecificproject,simplyfillintheblueboxesperinstructionsbelow.Forassistance,pleaseconsultourDesignStaff. DRAINAGEPIPE Thisdimensionalsoappliestothe PureFlo®DebrisShield,the FloFast®DrainageScreen, and fittings. The size selected is based upon system design rates, soil conditions, and the need for adequate venting. Choices are 6", 8",or 12" diameter. Refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems” for recommendations on which size best matches your application. BOLTEDRING&GRATE Standard models are quality cast iron and available to fit 24" Ø or 30" Ø manhole openings. All units are bolted in two locations with wording “Storm Water Only” in raised letters. For other surface treatments, please refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems.” INLET PIPE INVERT Pipesupto4"indiameterfromcatchbasins,undergroundstorage,etc.maybeconnected into the settling chamber. Inverts deeper than 5 feet will require additional settling chamber depth to maintain effective overflow height. "Ø "Ø "Ø ® TORRENT RESOURCES (CA) INCORPORATED phone 661~947~9836 CA Lic.886759 A, C-42 www.TorrentResources.com An evolution of McGuckin Drilling The referenced drawing and specifications are available on CAD either through our office or web site. This detail is copyrighted (2004) but may be used as is in construction plans without further release. For information on product application, individual project specifications or site evaluation, contact our DesignStaffforno-charge assistanceinanyphaseofyourplanning. 1. ManholeCone -ModifiedFlatBottom. 2. MoistureMembrane -6Mil.Plastic.Appliesonlywhen nativematerialisusedforbackfill.Placemembrane securelyagainsteccentricconeandholesidewall. 3. Bolted Ring & Grate - Diameter as shown. Clean cast iron withwording “StormWaterOnly”inraisedletters.Bolted in2locations andsecuredtoconewithmortar.Rimelevation ±0.02'ofplans. 4. GradedBasinorPaving (byOthers). 5. CompactedBaseMaterial - 1-SackSlurryexceptin landscapedinstalltionswithnopipeconnections. 6. PureFlo ®DebrisShield -Rolled16ga.steelX24"length withventedanti-siphonandInternal.265"Max.SWO flattened expanded steel screen X 12" length.Fusion bondedepoxycoated. 7. Pre-castLiner -4000PSIconcrete 48"ID.X54"OD.Center inhole andalignsections tomaximizebearingsurface. 8. Min.6'Ø DrilledShaft. 9. SupportBracket -Formed12Ga.steel.Fusionbonded epoxycoated. 10. OverflowPipe -Sch.40PVCmatedtodrainagepipeat baseseal. 11. DrainagePipe -ADShighwaygradewithTRI-Acoupler. Suspendpipe duringbackfilloperationstoprevent bucklingorbreakage.Diameterasnoted. 12. BaseSeal -Geotextileorconcreteslurry. 13.Rock -Washed,sizedbetween3/8"and1-1/2"to best complementsoilconditions. 14. FloFast ®DrainageScreen -Sch.40PVC0.120"slotted wellscreenwith32slotsperrow/ft.Diametervaries120" overalllengthwithTRI-Bcoupler. 15. Min.4'Ø Shaft -Drilledto maintainpermeability of drainagesoils. 16. FabricSeal -U.V.resistantgeotextile-toberemoved bycustomer atprojectcompletion. 17. Absorbent–HydrophobicPetrochemicalSponge. Min.to128oz.capacity. 18. FreeboardDepth Varieswithinletpipeelevation.Increase settlingchamberdepthasneededtomaintainallinlet pipeelevationsaboveoverflowpipeinlet. 19. Optional Inlet Pipe (Maximum 4", by Others). Extend moisture membraneandcompactedbasematerialor 1sackslurrybackfillbelowpipeinvert. ITEM NUMBERS MAXWELL®IVDRAINAGESYSTEMDETAILANDSPECIFICATIONS Thewatermarkfordrainagesolutions.®1/12 Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 ®Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4, ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080, C-42, HAZ. NV Lic. 0035350 A - NM Lic. 90504 GF04 U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 - TM Trademark 1974, 1990, 2004 ® 114188a:084318a1 1/10/12 8:17 AM Page 2 20 ft 20 f t 20 feet ESTIMATED TOTAL DEPTH The Estimated Total Depth is the approximate depth required to achieve 10 continuous feet of penetration into permeable soils. Torrent utilizes specialized “crowd” equipped drill rigs to penetrate difficult, cemented soils and to reach permeable materials at depths up to 180 feet. Our extensive database of drilling logs and soils information is available for use as a reference. Please contact our Design Staff for site-specific information on your project. 18 feet SETTLING CHAMBER DEPTH On MaxWell IV Systems of over 30 feet overall depth and up to 0.25cfs design rate, the standard Settling Chamber Depth is 18 feet . For systems exposed to greater contributory area than noted above, extreme service conditions, or that require higher design rates, chamber depths up to 25 feet are recommended. ' OVERFLOW HEIGHT The Overflow Height and Settling Chamber Depth determine the effectiveness of the settling process. The higher the overflow pipe, the deeper the chamber, the greater the settling capacity. For normal drainage applications, an overflow height of 13 feet is used with the standard settling chamber depth of 18 feet. Sites with higher design rates than noted above, heavy debris loading or unusual service conditions require greater settling capacities TORRENT RESOURCES INCORPORATED 1509 East Elwood Street, Phoenix Arizona 85040~1391 phone 602~268~0785 fax 602~268~0820 Nevada 702~366~1234 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4; ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080 A, C-42, HAZ ~ NV Lic. 0035350 A ~ NM Lic. 90504 GF04 18 ft 15 m i l M E M B R A N E D E P T H ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A EXPLORATORY LOGS Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G W a t e r C o r e B u l k 5 10 15 20 EXPLANATION Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types. Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or material type change. Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD). Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler. Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag sample. Other Laboratory Tests: Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content EI = Expansion Index SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve) Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer) 200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve Consol = Consolidation SE = Sand Equivalent Rval = R-Value ATT = Atterberg Limits Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/18/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-1 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 25 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inches Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inches ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qoal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous, Trace Fine gravel Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp to moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous @ 10 ft, trace fine to coarse gravel, decreased fines Silty Sand (SM): Pale brown, moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Boring ended at 25ft. No groundwater was encountered. Boring was converted into percolation test well (P-1) 18 17 18 16 12 11 13 2.5 2.9 8.5 4.8 98.3 101.7 91.9 94 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp to moist, loose, fine grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, medium dense, increased fines, few pinhole pores @ 15 ft, loose, decreased fines, grades to sand in tip @ 20 ft, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, decreased fines 13 12 10 11 25.4 22.7 15.3 16.6 95.1 97.6 Dist. 101.1 Consol Consol Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 35 40 45 @ 25 ft, Sample grades to sandy silt then back to silty sand @ 30 ft, loose Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 40 ft, dense, fine to medium grained sand @ 45 ft, fine to coarse grained sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide stains 14 8 22 26 34 11.5 19.7 12 16.8 Dist. Dist. Dist. Dist. Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 51.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 17 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-3 129.5 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine grained sand, trace construction debris (i.e.:clay pipe fragments) ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, moist, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceaous Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous, Iron oxide stains, grades to dark brown fine sand in tip Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide, trace pinhole pores Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Pale gray, damp, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 20 ft, Brown Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 14 10 12 12 9 25.1 4.4 20 96.9 97.5 98 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-4 132.0 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, some palm tree roots @ 4 ft, medium dense, some small sand lenses Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous, no roots present @ 10 ft, damp, medium dense Boring ended at 15 feet. No groundwater encountered. Converted into percolation test well (P-2). 18 12 10 15 9 2.7 7.2 10.9 2.2 99.1 92.3 98.5 93.7 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Light brown, damp to moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand, micaceous, trace amounts of fine gravel @ 10 ft, fine to coarse gravel, thin sandy silt lens @ 15 ft, medium to coarse grained sand, no silt lenses, no gravel @ 20 ft, dense, trace fine to coarse gravel Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, medium stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous. trace iron oxide staining 16 35 11 24 7 16 10.4 2.2 21.8 15.1 2.6 95.9 100.3 96.6 101.7 93.6 Max EI SO4 DS pH Resist Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 @ 30 ft, Olive brown, very moist, very stiff Sand (SP): Light brown, moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 31.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 6 15 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-9 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-6 133.1 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, thin silty sand lense in tip Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, same Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 15 ft, Silty Sand (SM): grades to silty sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, very stiff, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 5 6 18 10 14 22 2.7 2 19.2 3.1 97.4 95.1 98.7 95.4 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING 6" 3 " 1 . 5 " 3 / 4 " 3 / 8 " 4 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 U. S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E S I Z E S 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 Plate No: B-1 Job No: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GR A V E L S A N D SI L T A N D C L A Y CO A R S E F I N E ME D I U M UN I F I E D S O I L C L A S S I F I C A T I O N CO A R S E FI N E CO B B L E S CL A S S I F I C A T I O N PI LL SY M B O L SA M P L E LO C A T I O N 0.0001 0. 0 0 1 0. 0 1 0. 1 1 10 10 0 GR A I N S I Z E I N M I L L I M E T E R S 1009080706050403020100PERCENT RETAINED 0102030405060708090 10 0 P E R C E N T P A S S I N G Job No: Plate No: B-2DIRECT SHEAR SAMPLE LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE SAMPLE DESCRIPTION B-5 @ 0-5 feet Remolded @ 90% of 121.5 pcf @ 12%Silty Sand (SM) Strain Rate (in/min)0.01 Initial Moisture Content (%)13.8 13.8 13.8 Initial Dry Density (pcf) 107.6 107.6 107.6 Ultimate Displacement (in)0.25 0.25 0.25 Ultimate Shear Stress (ksf)0.636 1.128 2.208 Peak Displacement (in)0.008 0.005 0.01 Peak Shear Stress (ksf)0.72 1.296 2.256 Normal Stress (ksf)1 2 4 1 2 3Specimen No. 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 NORMAL STRESS (ksf) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 SH E A R S T R E S S ( k s f ) 0246810 Axial Strain (%) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) 0246810 Axial Strain (%) -0.025 0.000 0.025 Ve r t i c a l D i s p l a c e m e n t ( i n . ) 1 2 4 Strain Legend Peak Strength Legend Ultimate ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C PERCOLATION TESTING AND ANALYSES Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 25 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 134.8 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal.) 0 10:22 20 7.00 0.00 5 10:27 20 4.00 27.50 10 10:32 20 3.50 55.00 15 10:37 20 3.00 73.75 20 10:42 20 3.00 90.00 25 10:47 20 2.50 105.00 30 10:52 20 2.50 118.75 40 11:02 20 2.00 143.75 50 11:12 20 2.00 166.25 60 11:22 20 2.00 186.25 70 11:32 20 2.00 206.25 90 11:52 20 2.00 246.25 Constant Head Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head 7/18/2017 P-1 Development Services 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-1 Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 15 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 132 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal) 0 12:55 13 6.25 0.00 10 13:05 13 6.25 62.50 20 13:15 13 6.25 125.00 30 13:25 13.2 6.25 187.50 40 13:35 13.3 6.25 250.00 50 13:45 13.4 6.25 312.50 60 13:55 13.5 6.25 375.00 70 14:05 13.5 6.25 437.50 80 14:15 13.5 6.25 500.00 90 14:25 13.5 6.25 562.50 Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head Development Services 7/18/2017 P-2 Constant Head 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-2 J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐1 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 25 feet 20 feet 5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required: 1243.8 Gal. 2 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 4.54E‐03 ft/min. 3.27 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-3 Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Low Water Table High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Depth to Water (h₂): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. Temperature (T): (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐2 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 15 feet 13.5 feet 1.5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required:81.3 Gal. 6.25 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 9.48E‐02 ft/min. 68.23 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-4 Temperature (T): Depth to Water (h₂): Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well Low Water Table INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-5 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. STEADY STATE FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-6 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 15 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 3 . 2 5 h r ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-7 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 45 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -10 -6 -2 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-8 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 1.5 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-9 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 2.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 -2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-10 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 3.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 May 8, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Subject: Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi- Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California. Dear Mr. Haskins, Pursuant to your request, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. has completed an infiltration study for proposed water quality improvements. The scope of this investigation consisted of the following: Exploratory drilling, soil sampling and test well installation Field percolation testing Laboratory testing of selected soil samples Engineering analysis of the data Preparation of this report SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Location and Description The site is located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, within the city of Anaheim, California. The property is irregular in shape and comprises approximately 5.3 acres of land. The location of the site is depicted on Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by an auto dealership with an auto mechanics shop. The site is bordered by West Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, Loara Elementary School, a single family residence, and commercial development to the south, and a multi-family residential community to the west. At the time of this evaluation, the southern portion of the site was occupied by two buildings that house an automotive body shop and RV repair facility; the northern portion of the site is currently occupied by a used car dealership. A paved parking lot occupies the remainder of the property. Free standing walls were located along the perimeter of the property except on the northern portion of the site. The north is bordered by planters and sidewalks. The site is relatively level with elevations, based on GoogleEarth 2018, varying from approximately 129 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 135 feet above MSL. Drainage at the site appears to be directed as sheet flow towards the east within the southern portion of the site and to the north within the norther portion. Vegetation at the site consists of a few palm trees and shrubs along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. © 2017 Google SITE LOCATION MAP N The Olson Company Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1 SITE Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 3 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Development We understand the site will be developed for residential use. We anticipate the proposed site development will consist of 35 three-story townhomes and either a four- or five-story apartment building with a six- to seven-level parking structure. We also anticipate that all proposed structures will be constructed on grade (i.e. no subterranean elements). Associated interior driveways, perimeter/retaining walls, underground utilities and a storm water infiltration system are also anticipated. No grading or structural plans were available in preparing of this report. However, we anticipate that minor rough grading of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect the proposed residential dwellings will be wood-framed structures with concrete slabs on grade yielding relatively light foundation loads. The multi-level parking structure is anticipated to be a concrete and masonry block supported by conventional foundations. SUMMARY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK Subsurface Investigation Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on July 18, 2017, and consisted of drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 15 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-stem-auger drill rig. Representatives of Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings. Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling. Borings B-1 and B-4 were converted into percolation test wells (P-1 and P-2) at the completion of drilling. Two-inch-diameter casings were installed in each boring for subsequent percolation testing. The locations of the percolation wells are depicted on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Well screens having a length of approximately 10 feet where installed at the bottom of the percolation wells with solid pipe extending the remainder of the distance to the ground surface. The annular space of the well screen sections was filled with sand. Subsequent to completion of testing, the well casings were removed and the boring was refilled with drill cuttings. Percolation Testing Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 4 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation testing was performed on July 18, 2017, in general conformance with the constant-head test procedures outlined in the referenced Well Permeameter Method (USBR 7300-89). A water hose attached to a water source on site was connected to an inline flow meter to measure the water flow. The flow meter is capable of measuring flow rates up to 10 gallons per minute and as low as 0.1 gallons per minute. A valve was connected in line with the flow meter to control the flow rate. A filling hose was used to connect the flow meter and the test wells. Water was introduced by the filling hose near the bottom of the test wells. A water level meter with 1/100-foot divisions was used to measure the depths to water surface from the top of well casings. Flow to the wells was terminated upon either completion of testing of all the pre-determined water levels or the flow rate exceeded the maximum capacity of the flow meter. Measurements obtained during the percolation testing are provided on Plates C-1 and C-2. Laboratory Testing Selected soil samples of representative earth materials were tested to assist in the formulation of conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. Tests consisted of grain-size analysis. Laboratory testing relevant to percolation characteristics are presented in Appendix B. ANALYSIS OF DATA Subsurface Conditions The subsurface soils observed within the site are comprised of up to approximately 4 feet of artificial fill overlying alluvial deposits. The artificial fill is comprised of loose to medium dense silty sand. The alluvial deposits are comprised of loose to dense interlayers of silty sand and sand with variable amounts of gravel. Some discontinuous layers and lenses comprised of sandy silt were occasionally observed within the alluvium. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface explorations to a maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. A review of the CDMG Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03 indicates that historical high groundwater levels for the general site area have been estimated to be greater than 50 feet below the existing ground surface. Based on the referenced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report for the property, the groundwater depth is inferred to be approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) based on the subsurface investigation conducted on a nearby property (1631 West Lincoln Avenue and Closed Case #083004014T). Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 5 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation Data Analyses were performed to evaluate permeability using the flow rate obtained at the end of the constant-head stage of field percolation testing for the data obtained from percolation test well P-1 and P-2. These analyses were performed in accordance with the procedures provided in the referenced USBR method as presented on Plates C-4 through C-6 and summarized below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Summary of Back-Calculated Permeability Coefficient from Constant Head Test Location Total Depth of Well (ft) Depth to Water in Well (ft) Height of Water in Well (ft) Static Flow Rate (gal./min.) Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr.) P-1 (B-1) 25 20 5 2.0 3.27 P-2 (B-4) 15 13.5 1.5 6.25 68.23 Using the Kozeny-Carman equation, we estimated permeability rates based on laboratory testing consisting of particle-size analyses. The estimated permeability based on correlations with particle- size analyses are summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Estimated Permeability Coefficient Based on Gradation Location USCS Classification Depth (ft) Dry unit weight (pcf) Specific Gravity Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr) B-1 SM 20 - 2.65 2.71 B-4 SP 10 99.1 2.65 61.6 Design of Dry Well Infiltration in a dry well was modeled using the software Seep/W, version 2007, by Geo-Slope International. The program allows for modeling of both partially-saturated and saturated porous medium using a finite element approach to solve Darcy’s Law. The program can evaluate both steady- state and transient flow in planer and axisymmetric cases. Boundaries of the model can be identified with various conditions including fix total head, fix pressure head, fix flow rate, and head as a function of flow. Soil conductivity properties can be modeled with either Fredlund et al (1994), Green and Corey (1971), or Van Genuchten (1980). The Van Genuchten parameters were selected for use in our models and were based on test results of particle-size analyses and estimated in-place densities. The saturated conductivities for the infiltration zones were selected based on the results obtained from back-calculation of the percolation tests. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 6 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Seep/W model was setup with the bottom of the dry well at a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. The total depth of the dry well was assumed to be 6 feet in diameter and contain a settling chamber 18 feet in depth, have an inside diameter of 4 feet, and an outside diameter of 4.5 feet. Annular space around the chamber and below the chamber is assumed to consist of gravel. A more detailed model of the dry well design can be found on Plate 2. The model consisted of three zones of material to represent the general soil profile. The upper zone (Material # 1) was modeled to be relatively impermeable to represent artificial fill and to ignore contributions from this layer. The second zone (Material No. 2) was modeled to represent the poorly- graded sands encountered during our subsurface investigation that extend to the depth of 17 feet near Borings 1 and 4. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back-analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. The conductivity of the bottom zone (Material No. 3) was modeled to represent the interbedded sands and silty sands that were encountered during our subsurface investigation below a depth of 17 feet. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back- analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. A summary of the properties for each zone is provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Characteristic Curve Parameters Material No. Depth (ft) USCS Ks (in/hr) Van Genuchten Parameters a (1/cm) n m Sat. Water Content Residual Water Content 1 Impermeable Soils 0.001 0.0001 1.22 0.18 0.42 0.01 2 Sand 50.0 59.63 1.25 0.20 0.31 0.025 3 Silty Sand & Sand 3.0 3.00 1.36 0.27 0.33 0.025 Steady state analyses were performed to estimate the maximum inflow that a well can accommodate. The water head was set at 5 feet below the ground surface in the well. Using the well configuration described above, we obtain a peak static total flow of 0.29 ft³/sec. A plot depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors for the model are provided on Plate C-5. To evaluate the time required to empty the well once no more water is introduced, the model was reanalyzed with a variable head condition that was dependent upon the volume of water leaving the well. As water infiltrates into the surrounding soil, the volume of water remaining in the well is reduced as well as the resulting water head. A graph of the well head versus exit volume for the well configuration is provided in Figure 2. The function assumes a void ratio of 0.4 within the zones occupied by gravel. If some other well configuration is used, then the analyses will require updating. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 7 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Figure 2 –Well Head Function The analyses were performed as a transient case over a total time of approximately 4 hours. The water is evacuated from the chamber portion of the well in approximately 3 hours assuming the well utilizes a chamber 18 feet in depth. Plots depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors at selected times during the drawdown phase is provided in Appendix C on Plates C-6 through C-10. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on results of our testing, infiltration of storm water at the site is feasible using a shallow chamber system such as Stormtech chambers or dry wells. Recommendations pertinent to each type of system is provided below. The use of shallow chamber systems or dry wells is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction. As discussed above, the groundwater is approximately 100 feet deep and is anticipated to remain below a depth of 50 during the design life of the project. Therefore, chambers systems founded within the upper 10 feet and a dry well having a total depth of 20 will maintain the minimum clearance of 10 feet above groundwater as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Shallow System The infiltration rate of a shallow chamber system will be dependent upon the depth and width of the system as well as the depth of water contained in the chambers. For purposes of developing an infiltration rate, we have conservatively assumed a negligible ponding depth in the chambers. Since the soil profile consists of a higher permeability layer (SP) over a lower permeability layer (SM), the overall infiltration rate will depend essentially on the vertical clearance of the chamber bottom from the lower SM soil layer and the width of the system. We have assumed the infiltration rate can be 80 85 90 95 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 To t a l H e a d ( f t ) Volume (ft3) Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. estimated by using a weight average of the permeabilities of the upper SP layer with a permeability of 50 in/hr. and lower SM layer with a permeability of 3 in/hr. depending upon the depth and width of the system. The weighting is based on the giving full weight to the upper layer when the clearance is 3 times the system width. Where the clearance is less than 3 times the system width, the permeabilities are weighted according to the ratios of the permeabilities to 3 times the system width. The results of weighting of these two factors is summarized in Table 3 below. TABLE 3 Summary of Measured Infiltration Rates for Shallow Chamber Systems Depth to Bottom of Chamber System Width (ft) 6 ft 8 ft 10ft 10 20 in/hr. 17 in/hr. 14 in/hr. 20 12 in/hr. 10 in/hr. 9 in/hr. 30 9 in/hr. 8 in/hr. 7 in/hr. The system width should be based on the total minimum dimension across the chamber area regardless of how many individual chambers are used or the spacing between chambers. The project civil engineer should incorporate an appropriate factor of safety to the measured values indicated in Table 3 to develop the design infiltration rate. Excavation bottoms should be observed by the geotechnical consultant to verify that appropriate soils are present. Any soils that do not meet the anticipated minimum infiltration rate should be excavated and replaced with a granular material that meets or exceeds a permeability rate of 50 in./hr. Such a material may consist of a Caltrans Class II permeable base or other material approved by the geotechnical engineer. Chambers should be placed at least 20 feet horizontally from any building or property line. Once WQMP plans and calculations are developed, they should be reviewed by this office to confirm the intent of this report has been properly incorporated into the project. We also recommend that a representative of this office be present during construction to confirm the exposed soil conditions are as anticipated and to provide recommendations in the event they differ. Dry Well Results of our work indicate a storm water disposal system consisting of dry wells is feasible at the site. Based on results of percolation testing and analyses, a well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize an unfactored peak flow rate of 0.29 ft³/sec. in proximity to the infiltration test well locations (B-1 and B-4) indicated on Plate 1. An appropriate factor of safety should be applied to the flow rate as required by the governmental authority. Wells with differing diameters or lengths will result in differing infiltration rates. As such, this value should not be used for evaluation of other well configurations. The wells should be located at least 15 feet horizontally from any habitable structure or property line. Should you require multiple dry wells across the site, the wells should be spaced at least 70 feet, center Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 9 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. to center, to avoid cross influence. Provided the recommendations above are incorporated into the design of the drywell, permanent groundwater mounding is not anticipated to occur. The actual flow capacity of the dry well could be more or less than the estimated value. As such, provisions should be made to accommodate excess flow quantities in the event the dry well does not infiltrate the anticipated amount. The design also assumes that sediments will be removed from the inflowing water through an upper chamber or other device. Sediments that are allowed to enter the dry well will tend to degrade the flow capacity by plugging up the infiltration surfaces. In general, the dry well may consist of a concrete inner chamber surrounded by ½-inch open graded gravel. The concrete chamber should have perforations to allow the chamber to drain. The holes should be sized to prevent piping of the gravel into the chamber. A sand/cement slurry should be used as backfill outside the entire diameter of the drilled shaft within the upper 5 feet of the wells to restrict water from entering the upper 5 feet. A general diagram of the dry well is provided on Plate 2. In general, the dry well shaft is anticipated to be prone to sloughing and caving due to the layers of granular materials encountered during the subsurface investigation. We anticipate that casing will be required to install the well. Workers should not enter the shaft unless the excavation is laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements. The placement and compaction of backfill materials, including the gravel should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant. LIMITATIONS This report is based on the geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered in our boring excavations and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed representative of the project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observations by a geotechnical consultant during the construction phase of the storm water infiltration systems are essential to confirming the basis of this report. This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty. This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Development Advisors to assist the project consultants in the design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 10 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Principe David E. Albus Staff Engineer Principal Engineer G.E. 2455 Enclosures: Plate 1- Geotechnical Map Plate 2 – Typical Dry Well Exhibit Appendix A - Exploratory Logs Appendix B - Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Percolation Testing and Analyses Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES Publications California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Report 03, “Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California”, 1998. State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim and Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated April 17, 1997. Procedure for Performing Field Permeability Testing by the Well Permeameter Method, by United States Department of The Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR 7300-89). Saxton, K.E., W.J. Rawls, J.S. Romberger, and R.I. Papendick. 1986. Estimating generalized soil- water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50(4):1031-103 Reports Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 1600 West Lincoln, 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, City of Anaheim, California, prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., dated April 28, 2017 (Partner Project No. 16-177713.1). W. LINCOLN AVE. S. LOARA ST. P R O J E C T L I M I T B - 2 B-3 B - 6 B - 5 B - 1 / P - 1 B - 4 / P - 2 W. PAMPAS LN. A L B U S - K E E F E & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . G E O T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S G E O T E C H N I C A L M A P 2 6 2 3 . 0 0 J o b N o . : P l a t e : 1 D a t e : 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 8 Google 2017 E X P L A N A T I O N ( L o c a t i o n s A p p r o x i m a t e ) - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g B - 6 - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g & P e r c o l a t i o n T e s t B o r i n g B - 1 / P - 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 A P P R O X . S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 0 ' CALCULATINGMAXWELLIVREQUIREMENTS Thetypeofproperty,soilpermeability,rainfallintensityandlocaldrainageordinancesdeterminethenumberanddesignofMaxWellSystems.Forgeneralapplicationsdrainingretained stormwater, use one standard MaxWell IV per the instructions below for up to 3 acres of landscaped contributory area, and up to 1 acre of paved surface. For larger paved surfaces, subdivisiondrainage,nuisancewaterdrainage,connectingpipeslargerthan4"Øfromcatchbasinsorundergroundstorage,orotherdemandingapplications,refertoour MaxWell ®Plus System.Forindustrialdrainage,includinggasolineservicestations,our Envibro®System mayberecommended.Foradditionalconsiderations,pleasereferto “DesignSuggestionsFor RetentionAndDrainageSystems”orconsultourDesignStaff. COMPLETINGTHEMAXWELLIVDRAWING Toapplythe MaxWellIV drawingtoyourspecificproject,simplyfillintheblueboxesperinstructionsbelow.Forassistance,pleaseconsultourDesignStaff. DRAINAGEPIPE Thisdimensionalsoappliestothe PureFlo®DebrisShield,the FloFast®DrainageScreen, and fittings. The size selected is based upon system design rates, soil conditions, and the need for adequate venting. Choices are 6", 8",or 12" diameter. Refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems” for recommendations on which size best matches your application. BOLTEDRING&GRATE Standard models are quality cast iron and available to fit 24" Ø or 30" Ø manhole openings. All units are bolted in two locations with wording “Storm Water Only” in raised letters. For other surface treatments, please refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems.” INLET PIPE INVERT Pipesupto4"indiameterfromcatchbasins,undergroundstorage,etc.maybeconnected into the settling chamber. Inverts deeper than 5 feet will require additional settling chamber depth to maintain effective overflow height. "Ø "Ø "Ø ® TORRENT RESOURCES (CA) INCORPORATED phone 661~947~9836 CA Lic.886759 A, C-42 www.TorrentResources.com An evolution of McGuckin Drilling The referenced drawing and specifications are available on CAD either through our office or web site. This detail is copyrighted (2004) but may be used as is in construction plans without further release. For information on product application, individual project specifications or site evaluation, contact our DesignStaffforno-charge assistanceinanyphaseofyourplanning. 1. ManholeCone -ModifiedFlatBottom. 2. MoistureMembrane -6Mil.Plastic.Appliesonlywhen nativematerialisusedforbackfill.Placemembrane securelyagainsteccentricconeandholesidewall. 3. Bolted Ring & Grate - Diameter as shown. Clean cast iron withwording “StormWaterOnly”inraisedletters.Bolted in2locations andsecuredtoconewithmortar.Rimelevation ±0.02'ofplans. 4. GradedBasinorPaving (byOthers). 5. CompactedBaseMaterial - 1-SackSlurryexceptin landscapedinstalltionswithnopipeconnections. 6. PureFlo ®DebrisShield -Rolled16ga.steelX24"length withventedanti-siphonandInternal.265"Max.SWO flattened expanded steel screen X 12" length.Fusion bondedepoxycoated. 7. Pre-castLiner -4000PSIconcrete 48"ID.X54"OD.Center inhole andalignsections tomaximizebearingsurface. 8. Min.6'Ø DrilledShaft. 9. SupportBracket -Formed12Ga.steel.Fusionbonded epoxycoated. 10. OverflowPipe -Sch.40PVCmatedtodrainagepipeat baseseal. 11. DrainagePipe -ADShighwaygradewithTRI-Acoupler. Suspendpipe duringbackfilloperationstoprevent bucklingorbreakage.Diameterasnoted. 12. BaseSeal -Geotextileorconcreteslurry. 13.Rock -Washed,sizedbetween3/8"and1-1/2"to best complementsoilconditions. 14. FloFast ®DrainageScreen -Sch.40PVC0.120"slotted wellscreenwith32slotsperrow/ft.Diametervaries120" overalllengthwithTRI-Bcoupler. 15. Min.4'Ø Shaft -Drilledto maintainpermeability of drainagesoils. 16. FabricSeal -U.V.resistantgeotextile-toberemoved bycustomer atprojectcompletion. 17. Absorbent–HydrophobicPetrochemicalSponge. Min.to128oz.capacity. 18. FreeboardDepth Varieswithinletpipeelevation.Increase settlingchamberdepthasneededtomaintainallinlet pipeelevationsaboveoverflowpipeinlet. 19. Optional Inlet Pipe (Maximum 4", by Others). Extend moisture membraneandcompactedbasematerialor 1sackslurrybackfillbelowpipeinvert. ITEM NUMBERS MAXWELL®IVDRAINAGESYSTEMDETAILANDSPECIFICATIONS Thewatermarkfordrainagesolutions.®1/12 Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 ®Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4, ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080, C-42, HAZ. NV Lic. 0035350 A - NM Lic. 90504 GF04 U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 - TM Trademark 1974, 1990, 2004 ® 114188a:084318a1 1/10/12 8:17 AM Page 2 20 ft 20 f t 20 feet ESTIMATED TOTAL DEPTH The Estimated Total Depth is the approximate depth required to achieve 10 continuous feet of penetration into permeable soils. Torrent utilizes specialized “crowd” equipped drill rigs to penetrate difficult, cemented soils and to reach permeable materials at depths up to 180 feet. Our extensive database of drilling logs and soils information is available for use as a reference. Please contact our Design Staff for site-specific information on your project. 18 feet SETTLING CHAMBER DEPTH On MaxWell IV Systems of over 30 feet overall depth and up to 0.25cfs design rate, the standard Settling Chamber Depth is 18 feet . For systems exposed to greater contributory area than noted above, extreme service conditions, or that require higher design rates, chamber depths up to 25 feet are recommended. ' OVERFLOW HEIGHT The Overflow Height and Settling Chamber Depth determine the effectiveness of the settling process. The higher the overflow pipe, the deeper the chamber, the greater the settling capacity. For normal drainage applications, an overflow height of 13 feet is used with the standard settling chamber depth of 18 feet. Sites with higher design rates than noted above, heavy debris loading or unusual service conditions require greater settling capacities TORRENT RESOURCES INCORPORATED 1509 East Elwood Street, Phoenix Arizona 85040~1391 phone 602~268~0785 fax 602~268~0820 Nevada 702~366~1234 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4; ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080 A, C-42, HAZ ~ NV Lic. 0035350 A ~ NM Lic. 90504 GF04 18 ft 15 m i l M E M B R A N E D E P T H ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A EXPLORATORY LOGS Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G W a t e r C o r e B u l k 5 10 15 20 EXPLANATION Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types. Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or material type change. Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD). Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler. Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag sample. Other Laboratory Tests: Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content EI = Expansion Index SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve) Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer) 200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve Consol = Consolidation SE = Sand Equivalent Rval = R-Value ATT = Atterberg Limits Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/18/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-1 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 25 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inches Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inches ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qoal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous, Trace Fine gravel Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp to moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous @ 10 ft, trace fine to coarse gravel, decreased fines Silty Sand (SM): Pale brown, moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Boring ended at 25ft. No groundwater was encountered. Boring was converted into percolation test well (P-1) 18 17 18 16 12 11 13 2.5 2.9 8.5 4.8 98.3 101.7 91.9 94 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp to moist, loose, fine grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, medium dense, increased fines, few pinhole pores @ 15 ft, loose, decreased fines, grades to sand in tip @ 20 ft, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, decreased fines 13 12 10 11 25.4 22.7 15.3 16.6 95.1 97.6 Dist. 101.1 Consol Consol Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 35 40 45 @ 25 ft, Sample grades to sandy silt then back to silty sand @ 30 ft, loose Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 40 ft, dense, fine to medium grained sand @ 45 ft, fine to coarse grained sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide stains 14 8 22 26 34 11.5 19.7 12 16.8 Dist. Dist. Dist. Dist. Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 51.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 17 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-3 129.5 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine grained sand, trace construction debris (i.e.:clay pipe fragments) ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, moist, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceaous Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous, Iron oxide stains, grades to dark brown fine sand in tip Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide, trace pinhole pores Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Pale gray, damp, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 20 ft, Brown Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 14 10 12 12 9 25.1 4.4 20 96.9 97.5 98 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-4 132.0 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, some palm tree roots @ 4 ft, medium dense, some small sand lenses Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous, no roots present @ 10 ft, damp, medium dense Boring ended at 15 feet. No groundwater encountered. Converted into percolation test well (P-2). 18 12 10 15 9 2.7 7.2 10.9 2.2 99.1 92.3 98.5 93.7 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Light brown, damp to moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand, micaceous, trace amounts of fine gravel @ 10 ft, fine to coarse gravel, thin sandy silt lens @ 15 ft, medium to coarse grained sand, no silt lenses, no gravel @ 20 ft, dense, trace fine to coarse gravel Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, medium stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous. trace iron oxide staining 16 35 11 24 7 16 10.4 2.2 21.8 15.1 2.6 95.9 100.3 96.6 101.7 93.6 Max EI SO4 DS pH Resist Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 @ 30 ft, Olive brown, very moist, very stiff Sand (SP): Light brown, moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 31.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 6 15 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-9 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-6 133.1 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, thin silty sand lense in tip Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, same Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 15 ft, Silty Sand (SM): grades to silty sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, very stiff, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 5 6 18 10 14 22 2.7 2 19.2 3.1 97.4 95.1 98.7 95.4 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING 6" 3 " 1 . 5 " 3 / 4 " 3 / 8 " 4 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 U. S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E S I Z E S 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 Plate No: B-1 Job No: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GR A V E L S A N D SI L T A N D C L A Y CO A R S E F I N E ME D I U M UN I F I E D S O I L C L A S S I F I C A T I O N CO A R S E FI N E CO B B L E S CL A S S I F I C A T I O N PI LL SY M B O L SA M P L E LO C A T I O N 0.0001 0. 0 0 1 0. 0 1 0. 1 1 10 10 0 GR A I N S I Z E I N M I L L I M E T E R S 1009080706050403020100PERCENT RETAINED 0102030405060708090 10 0 P E R C E N T P A S S I N G ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C PERCOLATION TESTING AND ANALYSES Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 25 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 134.8 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal.) 0 10:22 20 7.00 0.00 5 10:27 20 4.00 27.50 10 10:32 20 3.50 55.00 15 10:37 20 3.00 73.75 20 10:42 20 3.00 90.00 25 10:47 20 2.50 105.00 30 10:52 20 2.50 118.75 40 11:02 20 2.00 143.75 50 11:12 20 2.00 166.25 60 11:22 20 2.00 186.25 70 11:32 20 2.00 206.25 90 11:52 20 2.00 246.25 Constant Head Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head 7/18/2017 P-1 Development Services 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-1 Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 15 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 132 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal) 0 12:55 13 6.25 0.00 10 13:05 13 6.25 62.50 20 13:15 13 6.25 125.00 30 13:25 13.2 6.25 187.50 40 13:35 13.3 6.25 250.00 50 13:45 13.4 6.25 312.50 60 13:55 13.5 6.25 375.00 70 14:05 13.5 6.25 437.50 80 14:15 13.5 6.25 500.00 90 14:25 13.5 6.25 562.50 Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head Development Services 7/18/2017 P-2 Constant Head 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-2 J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐1 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 25 feet 20 feet 5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required: 1243.8 Gal. 2 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 4.54E‐03 ft/min. 3.27 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-3 Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Low Water Table High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Depth to Water (h₂): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. Temperature (T): (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐2 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 15 feet 13.5 feet 1.5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required:81.3 Gal. 6.25 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 9.48E‐02 ft/min. 68.23 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-4 Temperature (T): Depth to Water (h₂): Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well Low Water Table INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-5 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. STEADY STATE FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-6 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 15 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 3 . 2 5 h r ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-7 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 45 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -10 -6 -2 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-8 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 1.5 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-9 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 2.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 -2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-10 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 3.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., April 2017 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT 1600 West Lincoln 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Report Date: April 28, 2017 Partner Project No. 16-177713.1 Prepared for: Development Advisors, LLC 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA 90501 ◊ Phone 800-419-4923 ◊ Fax 866-928-7418 April 28, 2017 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Partner Project No. 16-177713.1 Dear Mr. Haskins: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) report of the abovementioned address (the “subject property”). This assessment was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in the ASTM Practice E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. This assessment included a site reconnaissance as well as research and interviews with representatives of the public, property ownership, site manager, and regulatory agencies. An assessment was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at 310-622-8855. Sincerely, Debbie Stott, P.G. Principal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) and set forth by Development Advisors, LLC for the property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the “subject property”). The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Development Advisors, LLC with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property. Property Description The subject property is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of West Lincoln Avenue and South Loara Street within a mixed commercial, industrial, and residential area of Orange County. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property: Subject Property Data Address: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California Historical Addresses: 1602, 1628 West Lincoln Avenue, 109 South Loara Avenue (Dwellings) Property Use: Auto body repair/paint, Automotive sales, Recreational vehicle storage and minor servicing, Automotive wash/detail Land Acreage (Ac): 5.339 Acres Number of Buildings: Four Number of Floors: One (Mezzanine storage in the RV Service Solutions office building Gross Building Area (SF): Approximately 17,000 SF (Offices) and Approximately 34,300 SF (Canopy/Bays) Date of Construction: 1966 Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN): 250-091-009; 250-091-010; 250-091-011 Type of Construction: Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU) and Steel Current Tenants: Mills Collision Center, Hertz Car Sales, RV Service Solutions, Miranda Detail Site Assessment Performed By: Ramiro Vejar of Partner Site Assessment Conducted On: April 17, 2017 The subject property is currently occupied by Mills Collision Center, Hertz Car Sales, RV Service Solutions, and Miranda Detail for multi-tenant vehicle sales and servicing within four detached structures. Onsite operations consist of automotive vehicle sales (Hertz), auto body repair, paint, and storage of associated waste paints (Mills), minor recreational vehicle service, upholstery repair, and storage (RV Service Solutions), and automotive washing and detailing (Miranda). In addition to the current structures, the subject property is also improved with approximately twenty-six in ground hydraulic lifts, three in-ground clarifiers to manage waste water associated with former automotive servicing and currently car washing activities, a recreational vehicle dump station connected to the city sewer system, spray paint booths, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page ii approximately six floor drains which are reportedly connected to the onsite clarifiers, asphalt-paved parking areas, and associated landscaping According to available historical sources, the subject property was formerly developed with orchards for agricultural use and two dwellings from as early as 1938. By 1965 the former dwellings had been demolished and in 1966 the property was developed with the current structures for automotive sales and servicing. Tenants on the subject property have included McCoy Ford (1966-2014); Mills Ford (1980- 2011); RV Service Solutions (2014-Present); Mills Collision Center (2011-Present); and Hertz Car Sales, Miranda Detail (Present). The immediately surrounding properties consist of West Lincoln Avenue followed by CTS Cement Manufacturing, Arce Mufflers, Auto Regio, J&V Auto Repair, and Lincoln Smog Checks to the north; Loara Elementary School, Infinity Contactors, and Emazing Group to the south; South Loara Street followed by a vacant unoccupied building, Embassy Fitness, and a multi-tenant industrial building to the east; and an multi-tenant automotive servicing building and Pampas Apartments to the west. According to groundwater monitoring data obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker website and topographic map interpretation, the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) with flow toward the southwest. Findings A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: According to the available historical documentation, the subject property was developed with the current structures and associated subsurface features by 1966 for automotive maintenance service, repair, auto body, and sales. During the onsite reconnaissance, Partner observed the following features capable of impacting the subsurface: approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts, a compressor room with staining surrounding a floor drain, a former hazardous waste storage room (currently maintenance storage room) with stained concrete foundation surrounding a floor drain which is reportedly connected to a two-stage clarifier, automotive washing and detailing with two active floor drains reportedly connected to a single-stage clarifier, recreational vehicle washing with associated floor drains connected to a four-stage clarifier, prefabricated spray paint booths, storage of waste paints within 30-gallon drums (without secondary containment), and one recreational vehicle sanitary waste dump station which is reportedly connected to the sewer system. Based on age, polychlorinated Biphenyl’s (PCB’s) were likely used in the past in dielectric fluids and oils in a variety of equipment, including hydraulic- lifting equipment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page iii According to the EDR regulatory database listings, the subject property is listed as an Underground Storage Tank (UST) facility and Historical UST (HIST UST) site with nine (9) USTs. A HIST UST listing link to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) database identifies McCoy Motor Co. as operating from the subject property with (1) 1,000-gallon UST for unleaded fuel, one (1) transmission oil tank, two (2) motor oil tanks, three (3) waste oil tanks, and two (2) steam cleaning runoff sumps. The tank construction material, location, installation and/or removal dates, and tank capacities of eight tanks were not reported and the current occupants were not knowledgeable about past operations. Operations began at a time of little to no regulatory oversight, as such during redevelopment activities the potential to encounter additional subsurface features cannot be completely ruled out. A Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) case dated December 5, 1989 which reportedly impacted soils was listed on the regulatory database. The lead agencies identified as the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) did not have records for the LUST cleanup case. The LUST was identified as a closed case cleanup site on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online GeoTracker database dated June 20, 1990. The information indicates that this was a soil only case. According to onsite property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, a UST and dispenser was removed in the late 1980s from the subject property near the center of the parcel; however Mr. Mills was unaware of any additional USTs. As of this date, Partner has not received a response from the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency pertaining to releases, spills, or cleanup documentation. It should be noted that the City of Anaheim Fire Department did not identify the subject property as an active UST facility. No previous subsurface investigation reports were provided or available for Partner to review during the course of this assessment. The regulatory closure of the release with oversight is considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. Partner cannot confirm the former UST location, actual removal, or soil analytical results. Based on the length of time automotive servicing and repair operations have been conducted onsite (approximately 51 years), hazardous material storage and generated waste, current staining, lack of subsurface investigations, lack of information regarding the disposition of the eight SWRCB registered tanks at the facility, hydraulic lifts, and clarifier systems, the historical use, subsurface features, and current condition are considered a recognized environmental condition. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page iv Partner did not identify any controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: See REC above for closed LUST case. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Due to the age of the subject property buildings, there is a potential that asbestos-containing material (ACM) and/or lead-based paint (LBP) are present. A few areas of the building materials including ceiling drywall, acoustic ceiling materials, and drop down ceiling tiles were noted during the assessment to have signs of water damage. The identified suspect ACMs would need to be sampled to confirm the presence or absence of asbestos prior to any renovation or demolition activities to prevent potential exposure to workers and/or building occupants. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions and an environmental issue in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends the following: A limited subsurface investigation should be conducted in order to determine the presence or absence of soil and/or groundwater contamination due to the historical use of the subject property. Prior to demolition, a demolition level asbestos survey and abatement, if required, must be performed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Limitations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 User Reliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Limiting Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Current Property Use ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.4.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4.3 Geology/Soils .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information ...................................................................................................................................... 6 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION............................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Fire Insurance Maps ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 City Directories .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps ................................................................................................................................... 10 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ..................................................................................................... 13 4.1 Regulatory Agencies .................................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.1 Health Department ............................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.2 Public Utilities Department ............................................................................................................................. 13 4.1.3 City Fire Department ......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.4 Air Pollution Control Agency .......................................................................................................................... 14 4.1.5 Regional Water Quality Agency .................................................................................................................... 15 4.1.6 Department of Toxic Substances Control ................................................................................................. 15 4.1.7 Building Department ......................................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.8 Planning Department ........................................................................................................................................ 16 4.1.9 Oil & Gas Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 17 4.1.10 Assessor’s Office .................................................................................................................................................. 17 4.2 Mapped Database Records Search ........................................................................................................................ 17 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary ..................................................................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings ................................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings .............................................................................................................................. 19 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings .................................................................................................................................. 23 4.2.5 Orphan Listings .................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS .................................................................... 24 5.1 Interviews ......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.1 Interview with Owner ........................................................................................................................................ 25 5.1.2 Interview with Report User .............................................................................................................................. 25 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page vi 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager .................................................................................................................. 25 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants .................................................................... 25 5.1.5 Interview with Others ........................................................................................................................................ 25 5.2 User Provided Information ........................................................................................................................................ 25 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs ......................................................................................... 25 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge ..................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User ....................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ....................................................................................... 26 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .......................................................... 26 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation ....................................................................... 26 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................................................... 27 6.1 General Site Characteristics....................................................................................................................................... 27 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards............................................................................................................................ 28 6.3 Non-ASTM Services...................................................................................................................................................... 31 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ..................................................................................................... 31 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) ..................................................................................................................................... 32 6.3.3 Radon ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water ..................................................................................................................................... 32 6.3.5 Mold ......................................................................................................................................................................... 32 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance ........................................................................................................................ 33 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 34 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................................................................. 37 9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 38 Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Topographic Map Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Historical/Regulatory Documentation Appendix C Regulatory Database Report Appendix D Qualifications Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this ESA is to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-13) affecting the subject property that: 1) constitute or result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicable environmental law; 2) impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or require a material change in the use thereof; 3) require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4) may affect the value of the subject property; and 5) may require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1) evaluate its legal and financial liabilities for transactions related to foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing; 2) evaluate the subject property’s overall development potential, the associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property; and/or 3) determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing of the subject property. This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E1527-13 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(3 5)(B). 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527- 13. This assessment included: 1) a property and adjacent site reconnaissance; 2) interviews with key personnel; 3) a review of historical sources; 4) a review of regulatory agency records; and 5) a review of a regulatory database report provided by a third-party vendor. Partner contacted local agencies, such as environmental health departments, fire departments and building departments in order to determine any current and/or former hazardous substances usage, storage and/or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property. Additionally, Partner researched information on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) at these agencies. As defined by ASTM E1527-13, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: 1) to reduce or eliminate potential Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 2 exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the subject property; or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property. If requested by Client, this report may also include the identification, discussion of, and/or limited sampling of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), mold, and/or radon. 1.3 Limitations Partner warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the all appropriate inquiry provisions of the LLPs. Further, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property. Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA as defined by ASTM include the following: ACMs, LBP, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in Section 6.3. 1.4 User Reliance Development Advisors, LLC engaged Partner to perform this assessment in accordance with an agreement governing the nature, scope and purpose of the work as well as other matters critical to the engagement. All reports, both verbal and written, are for the sole use and benefit of Development Advisors, LLC. Either Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 3 verbally or in writing, third parties may come into possession of this report or all or part of the information generated as a result of this work. In the absence of a written agreement with Partner granting such rights, no third parties shall have rights of recourse or recovery whatsoever under any course of action against Partner, its officers, employees, vendors, successors or assigns. Any such unauthorized user shall be responsible to protect, indemnify and hold Partner, Client and their respective officers, employees, vendors, successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) and costs attributable to such Use. Unauthorized use of this report shall constitute acceptance of and commitment to these responsibilities, which shall be irrevocable and shall apply regardless of the cause of action or legal theory pled or asserted. Additional legal penalties may apply. This report has been completed under specific Terms and Conditions relating to scope, relying parties, limitations of liability, indemnification, dispute resolution, and other factors relevant to any reliance on this report. Any parties relying on this report do so having accepted the Terms and Conditions for which this report was completed. A copy of Partner’s standard Terms and Conditions can be found at http://www.partneresi.com/terms-and-conditions.php. 1.5 Limiting Conditions The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E1527-13. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below: Interviews with past or current owners, operators and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. Based on information obtained from other historical sources (as discussed in Section 3.0), this data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this assessment. Partner submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to Anaheim Public Utilities Environmental Services for information pertaining to hazardous substances, underground storage tanks, releases, inspection records, etc. for the subject property. As of this writing, this agency has not responded to Partner’s request. Based on information obtained from other historical sources, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment. Partner’s view of the ground during the site assessment was obstructed due to parked cars and excessive storage. Based on information obtained from other historical sources, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment. Due to time constraints associated with this report, the Client has requested the report despite the above- listed limitations. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description The subject property at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in Anaheim, California is located on the southwest corner intersection of West Lincoln Avenue and South Loara Street. According to the Orange County Public Works, the subject property is legally described as Parcels 2 and 3 of Parcel Map Book 19 Page 47 and Lot 3 of Helen & Lynch Addition L.A. 3-118. Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map, and Appendix A: Site Photographs for the location and site characteristics of the subject property. 2.2 Current Property Use The subject property is currently occupied by Mills Collision Center, Hertz Car Sales, RV Service Solutions, and Miranda Detail for multi-tenant vehicle sales and servicing within four detached structures. Onsite operations consist of automotive vehicle sales (Hertz), auto body repair, paint, and storage of associated waste paints (Mills), minor recreational vehicle service, upholstery repair, and storage (RV Service Solutions), and automotive washing and detailing (Miranda). During the onsite reconnaissance, Partner observed the following features capable of impacting the subsurface: approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts, a compressor room with staining surrounding a floor drain, a former hazardous waste storage room (currently maintenance storage room) with stained concrete foundation surrounding a floor drain which is reportedly connected to a two-stage clarifier, automotive washing and detailing with two active floor drains reportedly connected to a single-stage clarifier, recreational vehicle washing with associated floor drains connected to a four-stage clarifier, prefabricated spray paint booths, storage of waste paints within 30-gallon drums (without secondary containment), and one recreational vehicle sanitary waste dump station which is reportedly connected to the sewer system. In addition to the current structures, and described equipment, the subject property is also improved with asphalt-paved parking areas and associated landscaping. The subject property is designated for general commercial development by the City of Anaheim. The subject property was identified as a Underground Storage Tank (UST), Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank (RGA LUST), Aboveground Storage Tank (AST), Emissions Inventory Database (EMI), Facility and Manifest Data (HAZNET), Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List (HIST CORTESE), Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), and Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) site in the regulatory database report, as further discussed in Section 4.2. 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties The subject property is located within a mixed commercial, industrial, and residential area of Orange County. During the vicinity reconnaissance, Partner observed the following land use on properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: Immediately Surrounding Properties Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 5 Immediately Surrounding Properties North: West Lincoln Avenue followed by CTS Cement Manufacturing (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Auto Regio (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), Arce Mufflers (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), J&V Auto Repair (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Lincoln Smog Checks (1611 West Lincoln Avenue) South: Loara Elementary School (1601 West Broadway), Infinity Contractors (225 South Loara Street) and South Loara Street followed by Emazing Group (220 South Loara Street) to the southeast East: South Loara Street followed by an unoccupied building under construction (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), Embassy Fitness (1567 Embassy Street, 118 South Loara Street), and a multi-tenant industrial building (1566 Embassy Street0 West: Pampas Apartments (1631 West Pampas Lane (1631 West Pampas Lane) and a multi-tenant automotive service complex (1640-1648 West Lincoln Avenue) The adjacent properties were identified as Underground Storage Tank (UST), Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Superfund Enterprise Management System, Emissions Inventory Database (EMI), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Small Quantity Generator (RCRA-SQG), EDR Historical Auto Station Site, Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), and Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) sites in the regulatory database report summarized in Section 4.2. 2.4 Physical Setting Sources 2.4.1 Topography The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic map was reviewed for this ESA. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, the subject property is located at approximately 130-feet above mean sea level (MSL). The contour lines in the area of the subject property indicate the area is sloping toward the southwest. No improvements are depicted on the subject property in the 2015 map. A copy of the most recent topographic map is included as Figure 3 of this report. 2.4.2 Hydrology According to a previous subsurface investigation conducted on a nearby property (1631 West Lincoln Avenue and Closed Case #083004014T), the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs). Based on topographic map interpretation, groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to flow toward the southwest. The nearest surface water in the vicinity of the subject property is the Carbon Creek located approximately 0.65-miles north of the subject property. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands or natural catch basins were observed at the subject property during this assessment. According to available information, a public water system operated by Anaheim Public Utilities (APU) serves the subject property vicinity. According to the 2016 Water Quality Report, shallow groundwater beneath the subject property is not utilized for domestic purposes. The sources of public water for the City of Anaheim are local groundwater and surface water imported from Northern California and the Colorado River. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 6 2.4.3 Geology/Soils The subject property lies within the Orange County Coastal Plain area of the Los Angeles Basin. The plain consists of predominantly alluvial basin-fill material deposited by meandering tributaries of the Santa Ana River system (Morton, et al., 1979). Surficial geology in the subject property vicinity consists of recent alluvium consisting of gravel, sand, silty sand, and clayey silt with an average thickness of 200 feet (Poland, et al., 1956; California DWR, 1967). This recent alluvium is underlain by the upper Pleistocene Lakewood Formation, which averages 500 feet in thickness and consists of alternating stratigraphic zones of coarse- grained sand and clayey silt. The estimated depth to bedrock is more than 200 feet. Based on information obtained from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey online database, the subject property is mapped as 61% San Emigdio fine sandy loam (194), 30% Sam Emigdio fine sandy loam, moderately fine substratum (196), and 9% Hueneme fine sandy loam (158). The San Emigdio 194 series is deep and well drained soils that were formed in riser and toeslope alluvial fans derived from sedimentary rock. The typical San Emigdio 194 series consists of fine sandy loam at 0 to 7 inches and stratified gravelly loamy coarse sand to very fine sandy loam at 7 to 61 inches on 0 to 2 percent slopes. The San Emigdio 196 series is deep and well drained soils that were formed in riser, flat, and toeslope alluvial fans derived from sedimentary rock. The typical San Emigdio 196 series consists of fine sandy loam at 0 to 7 inches, stratified gravelly loamy coarse sand to very fine sandy loam at 7 to 40 inches, silty clay loam at 40 to 44 inches, and stratified gravelly loamy coarse sand to very fine sandy loam on 0 to 2 percent slopes. The typical Hueneme 158 series is deep and poorly drained soils that were formed in toeslope and rise alluvial fans of stratified alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. The typical Hueneme 158 series consists of fine sandy loam at 0 to 27 inches and stratified sand to silt loam at 27 to 60 inches on 0 to 2 percen t slopes. 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information Partner performed a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. According to Community Panel Number 06059C0129J, dated December 3, 2009, the subject property appears to be located in shaded Flood Zone X, an area of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas, protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. A copy of the reviewed flood map is not included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 7 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below: Historical Use Information Period/Date Source Description/Use 1896-1902 Topographic Maps Depicted with a small single structure 1935-1965 Aerial Photographs, Interviews, Topographic Maps Agricultural land with residential dwellings 1966-Present Aerial Photographs, Building Records, City Directories, Interviews, Onsite Observations Current structures for automotive sales, maintenance, and repairs According to available historical sources, the subject property was formerly developed with orchards for agricultural use and two dwellings from as early as 1938. By 1965 the former dwellings had been demolished and in 1966 the property was developed with the current structures for automotive sales and servicing. Tenants on the subject property have included McCoy Ford (1966-2014); Mills Ford (1980- 2011); RV Service Solutions (2014-Present); Mills Collision Center (2011-Present); and Hertz Car Sales, Miranda Detail (Present). Potential environmental concerns were identified in association with the current and former use of the subject property, as further discussed in sections 4.2.2 and 6.2. 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review Partner obtained available aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from Environmental Data Resources (EDR) on April 25, 2017. The following observations were noted to be visible on the subject property and adjacent properties during the aerial photograph review: Date: 1938, 1953 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Agricultural developed land with orchards and dwellings to the northeast and northwest North: Agricultural developed land with a small structure across West Lincoln Avenue South: Agricultural developed land with orchards East: Agricultural developed land with orchard across South Loara Street West: Agricultural developed land with orchards Date: 1963 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Fallow land, removed of the orchards. Dwellings remain on the northeast and northwest North: Appears to be developed with the current structures across West Lincoln Avenue South: Fallow land and developed with small structures East: Developed with the current industrial buildings across South Loara Street West: Fallow land Date: 1972, 1977, 1987 Scale: 1”=500’ Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 8 Date: 1972, 1977, 1987 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Developed with the current service bay buildings to the southeast, southwest, and northwest and current office building to the northeast, the paved areas appear to be occupied by an auto sales parking lot North: Developed with the current structures across West Lincoln Avenue South: Developed with the current school fields to the southwest, small structures to the south, and current industrial building to the southeast East: Developed with the current industrial buildings across South Loara Street West: Developed with the current multi-tenant automotive building and residential apartment buildings Date: 1990, 1995, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Developed with the current service bay buildings to the southeast, southwest, and northwest and current office building to the northeast, the paved areas appear to be occupied by an auto sales parking lot North: Developed with the current structures across West Lincoln Avenue South: Developed with the current school fields to the southwest, current structure to the south, and current industrial building to the southeast East: Developed with the current industrial buildings across South Loara Street West: Developed with the current multi-tenant automotive building and residential apartment buildings Copies of select aerial photographs are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.2 Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn map coverage was not available for the subject property. 3.3 City Directories Partner reviewed historical city directories obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR) on April 25, 2017 for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property and adjacent properties. The findings are presented in the following table: City Directory Search for 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (Subject Property) Year(s) Occupant Listed 1941 Paul H Yorde 1955 JB Williams 1966 McCoy Ford 1970 McCoy Ford, Car Rental & Leasing 1975 McCoy Ford, Car Rental & Leasing 1980 Mills Ford 1986 Mills Ford 1991 McCoy Ford, Mills Ford 1995 McCoy Ford, Mills Ford 2005 McCoy Motor Co., Property Investors Partnership, Southwest-Tex Leasing Co Inc., Warpar LLC 2010 McCoy Motor Co. 2014 McCoy Motor Co., RV Service Solutions Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 9 According to the city directory review, the subject property has been occupied by auto dealerships from as early as 1966. The subject property tenants were identified as LUST, UST, and HAZNET sites on the EDR regulatory database as further discussed in section 4.2.2. City Directory Search for Adjacent Properties Year(s) Occupant Listed 1955 La Habra Stucco (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Peerless Spray Chemical Co. (225 South Loara Street) 1966 National Auto Glass of Anaheim (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Nationwide Safti Brake Centers (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), La Habra Stucco (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Prudential Overall Supply (1567 West Embassy Street) 1970 Advance Auto Safety Centers (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Clem Schmitt -Adv. & Designs (1621 West Lincoln Avenue), La Habra Products Inc. (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Goodway Copy Center (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), AAMCO Transmissions (1644 West Lincoln Avenue), Anaheim Motorcycle Rental & Assemblers (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Anaheim Motorcycle Rental & Assemblers (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), La Habra Products Inc. (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Goodway Copy Centers (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), Amco Automatic Transmissions (1644 West Lincoln Avenue), The Taylor System (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), Ace Fixture Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), Body Shop (1566 West Embassy Street), Quali fied Systems Inc. (1567 West Embassy Street), King O Lawn Distributor Inc. (225 South Loara Street) 1975 National Auto Glass of Anaheim (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Herbs Foreign Car Service (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), Russ Auto Service (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Cycle Painting g(1621 Auto Regio (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), La Habra Products Inc. (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Scuba Schools of Anaheim (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), J&G Radiator Service (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), California Woodworking Machinery Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), Orange County Service Station Equipment (225 South Loara Street) 1980 Anaheim National Auto Glass Co (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Herbs Foreign Car Service (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), RUS Auto Service (1613 West Lincoln Aven ue), Red Fox Camera Center (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), Sales Order Desk (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Suba Schools (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), J&G Radiator Service (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), McLeod Tool & Gage (1567 West Embassy Street), Machinery Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), Orange County Service Station Equipment (225 South Loara Street) 1986 Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Crescent Auto Repair (1609 West Lincoln Avenue), SPR Foreign Auto Repair (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), Randy’s Ingenuity (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Redfox Photographic Rentals (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), Scuba Toys & Schools Inc. (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), J&G Radiator Service (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), McLeod Tool & Gage (1567 West Embassy Street), California Woodworking Machinery Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), Orange County Service Station Equipment (225 South Loara Street) 1991 Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Magic Window Tinting (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Red Fox Camera Center (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), Sales Order Desk (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), MD Custom Bikes (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), J&G Radiator Service (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), McLeod Tool & Gage (1567 West Embassy Street), California Woodworking Machinery Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), The California Leaguer (225 South Loara Street) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 10 City Directory Search for Adjacent Properties Year(s) Occupant Listed 1995 Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), K&K Auto Repair Center (1609 West Lincoln Avenue), D&N Auto Discount Brake & Tire Service (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), Preferred Customers Automotive (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), MD Custom Bikes (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), Overhead Door Emergency Service (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), Custom Creations (1566 West Embassy Street), California Woodworking Machinery Co. (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), California Lawnmower Products (225 South Loara Street) 2005 J&V Auto Repair (1609 West Lincoln Avenue), Lincoln Smoke Check (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), Los Primos Auto Service (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Auto Regio (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), Parelx La Habra Inc. (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), B&B Smog (1644 West Lincoln Avenue), Anaheim Auto Body (1646 West Lincoln Avenue), T Auto Repair, Overhead Door Emergency Services (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), R&S Automation Inc. (1566 West Embassy Street), Mendenhall Richard Enterprises (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), NSI Architectural Lighting (225 South Loara Street) 2010 J&V Auto Repair (1609 West Lincoln Avenue), Lincoln Smoke Check (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), Los Primos Auto Service (1613 West Lincoln Avenue), Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Auto Regio (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), CTS Cement Manufacturing (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Nino Auto Service (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), Martinez Tires & Wheels (1644 West Lincoln Avenue), Anaheim Auto Body (1646 West Lincoln Avenue), T Auto Repair (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), Jaeso Studio, One Day Sings Inc. (1566 West Embassy Street), Cal Wood (1566 West Lincoln Avenue), One Solution Light and Control Ledworks (225 South Loara Street) 2014 J&V Auto Repair (1609 West Lincoln Avenue), Lincoln Smoke Check (1611 West Lincoln Avenue), David’s Auto Repair, Los Primos Auto Service (1613 West Lincoln Avenue) Action Muffler (1615 West Lincoln Avenue), Auto Regio (1617 West Lincoln Avenue), CTS Cement Manufacturing (1631 West Lincoln Avenue), Nino Auto Service (1640 West Lincoln Avenue), Martinez Tires & Wheels (1644 West Lincoln Avenue), Anaheim Auto Body (1646 West Lincoln Avenue), T Auto Repair (1648 West Lincoln Avenue), Bonded By Integrity, One Day Signs Inc., Drizzle Studios (1566 West Embassy Street), One Solution Light and Control Ledworks (225 South Loara Street) According to the city directory review, the adjacent properties have been occupied by commercial and industrial businesses from as early as 1955. The adjacent properties to the north, east, west, and south were identified on the EDR regulatory database as further discussed in section 4.2.3. Copies of reviewed city directories are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps Partner reviewed historical topographic maps obtained from Environmental Data Resources (EDR) on April 25, 2017. The following observations were noted to be depicted on the subject property and adjacent properties during the topographic map review: Date: 1896,1898 Subject Property: Depicted with a single structure on the southeast North: Undeveloped across a road followed by train tracks South: Undeveloped Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 11 Date: 1896,1898 East: Depicted with a single small structure to the southeast across a road West: Depicted with a single structure to the west-northwest Date: 1901,1902 Subject Property: Depicted with a single structure on the southeast North: Undeveloped across a road followed by train tracks South: Depicted with a single small structure East: Depicted two small structures across a road West: Depicted with a single structure to the west-northwest Date: 1935 Subject Property: Depicted with one small structure to the northwest and two small structures to the northwest; undeveloped to the south of the structures North: Depicted with a small structure across a road followed by train tracks South: Depicted with a single small structure East: Depicted two small structures across a road West: Depicted with two small structures to the west-northwest Date: 1942,1949,1950 Subject Property: Depicted with one small structure to the northwest and two small structures to the northwest; the remainder of the property is depicted as agriculturally developed North: Depicted with a small structure across a road followed by train tracks and agricultural land beyond that South: Depicted with a single small structure, agricultural land, and a school structure East: Depicted two small structures across a road and agricultural land West: Depicted with two small structures to the west-northwest and agricultural land Date: 1965 Subject Property: Depicted with one small structure to the northwest and one small structure to the northwest; the remainder of the property is depicted as undeveloped North: Depicted with small structures across West Lincoln Avenue South: Depicted with a single small structure and a school property East: Depicted with Loara Street followed by a shaded area, indicating an urban developed area West: Depicted with rectangular buildings Date: 1972 Subject Property: Depicted with one small structure to the northwest and one small structure to the northwest and two of the current rectangular structures to the south North: Depicted with small structures across West Lincoln Avenue Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 12 Date: 1972 South: Depicted with a single small structure and a school property East: Depicted with Loara Street followed by a shaded area, indicating an urban developed area West: Depicted with the current rectangular buildings Date: 1981 Subject Property: Depicted with the current building layout and one of the historic dwellings on the northwest corner North: Depicted with small structures across West Lincoln Avenue South: Depicted with a single small structure and a school property East: Depicted with Loara Street followed by a shaded area, indicating an urban developed area West: Depicted with the current rectangular buildings Copies of reviewed topographic maps are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 13 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Regulatory Agencies 4.1.1 Health Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Point of Contact: Liza Rodriguez Agency Address: 1241 East Dyer Road Suite 120, Santa Ana, California 92702 Agency Phone Number: (714) 433-6000 Date of Contact: April 6 and 24, 2017 Method of Communication: Faxed Request/Telephone Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the OCHCA. 4.1.2 Public Utilities Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Public Utilities (APU) Agency Address: 201 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805 Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-4189 Date of Contact: April 24, 2017; April 25, 2017 Method of Communication: Telephone/Email Summary of Communication: As of the date of this report, Partner has not received a response from the APU for inclusion in this report. 4.1.3 City Fire Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Fire Department (AFD) Point of Contact: Kallita Daniel Agency Address: 201 South Anaheim Boulevard Suite 300, Anaheim, California 92805 Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-4040 Date of Contact: April 6 and 11, 2017 Method of Communication: Faxed Request/Mail Summary of Communication: According to reviewed AFD records, Mills Collision Center Inc. is identified as facility case number FEP-0002419, an active Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) permitted Hazardous Waste Generator with a Hazardous Materials Business Plan. Mills Ford was on file with AFD as a former permitted standard generator with an aboveground storage tank between 2006 and 2010. On April 5, 2011 a facility status change with the AFD updated Mills Ford as Mills Auto Sales. Available 2006 and 2011 hazardous material inventories for Mills Ford on file with the AFD includes aqueous parts cleaning solution, paint thinners, reducers & catalysts, waste antifreeze, waste Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 14 Regulatory Agency Data lubricating oils, waste paint materials, antifreeze, propane, floor cleaners, motor & gear lubricating oils, and welding gasses. The latest Mills Collision chemical inventory on file with the AFD dated February 26, 2015 includes welding gases, paint thinners, reducers, automotive paint, and waste related to paint materials. The subject property was not identified on active AFD UST and AST database listings. 4.1.4 Air Pollution Control Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Point of Contact: FINDS Database Agency Address: 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California 91765 Agency Phone Number: (909) 396-2000 Date of Contact: April 6, 2017 and April 25, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: According to available information, Mills Collision Center is on file with the AQMD from as early as October 5, 1966 as facility identification number 1082. A renewed permit to operate with one 980-gallon UST was issued to Mills Ford on April 12, 1988. The tank was identified as submerged with an offset fill pipe and one fueling nozzle. The UST permit was identified as inactive. A permit to operate a waste water evaporation/solvent recovery system was issued to Mills Ford on January 14, 1988 for the recovery of contaminated lacquer thinner and cleaning solvent generated. Additional expired permits issued between 1991 and 1996 include a CFC-12 permit for refrigerants recovery and recycling and an inactive spray booth equipment in 1990. Mills Collision is identified as an active facility to operate with spray paint booth equipment as permit numbers D46655 and F92416. No open Notices of Violation (NOV) or Notices to Comply (NTC) or the presence of AULs, dry cleaning machines, or active USTs were on file for the subject property with the AQMD. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 15 4.1.5 Regional Water Quality Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Point of Contact: Mary Edwards Agency Address: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ Agency Phone Number: (951) 782-4499 Date of Contact: April 7, 2017 and April 25, 2017 Method of Communication: Email and Online database Summary of Communication: According to available information obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online GeoTracker database, the subject property identified as Mills Ford reported a release of gasoline which impacted soil on December 5, 1989. According to Ms. Mary Edwards of the Santa Ana RWQCB, no records were on file for the release identified as case number T0605901074. The lead agency is identified as Orange County LOP (OCHCA) with Case #90UT031. However, according to Ms. Liza Rodriguez with the OCHCA, no records for the subject property were on file for the subject property with the OCHCA. The release was listed on the GeoTracker database as case closed dated June 20, 1990. Partner has reached out to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities to review any records which may be on-file associated to the reported release. As of this date the City of Anaheim Public Utilities has not responded to Partners request. 4.1.6 Department of Toxic Substances Control Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Agency Address: http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ http://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov/report_list.cfm Agency Phone Number: (877) 786-9427 Date of Contact: April 3, 2017 and April 25, 2017 Method of Communication: Online database Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the following subject property tenants were identified as Hazardous Waste Tracking System Sites: M&D Custom Bikes at 1600 West Lincoln is listed as inactive identification number CAL000017199 between 1989 and 1995 with no reported waste generated. Mills Collision Center, Inc. at 1600 West Lincoln is listed as active identification number CAD981388002 from as early as 1990 and waste inventories generated between 1993 and 2016. Waste inventories are further discussed in the regulatory database Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 16 Regulatory Agency Data section 4.2.2. No records regarding a release or the presence of AULs on the subject property were on file with the DTSC. 4.1.7 Building Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Building Department (ABD) Source: http://records.anaheim.net/building/Welcome.aspx?cr=1 Agency Address: 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805 Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-5153 Date of Contact: April 14, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: Records were available for review, as further discussed in the following table. Building Records Reviewed for 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (Subject Property) Year(s) Owner/Applicant Description 1964 Charles & Frank Permit to demolish dwellings at 109 South Laura and 1602 West Lincoln 1965 McCoy Motors Permit for sewer connection 1965 C.B. Frank Permit to demolish dwellings at 1628 West Lincoln 1965 McCoy Motor Co., Inc. Permit for service manager booth; service sign; used car office; office show room; shop; parts building; 1966 McCoy Motors Co. Inc. Permit application, office show room 1968 McCoy Motors Permit to construct a new car shop 1968 McCoy Motors Permit for a new car ready shop 1985 Mills Ford Certificate of Occupancy, Parts, Storage, Dispatch, Retail 1985 Mills Ford Permit to demo building interiors and remodel with parts storage, dispatch, retail 1988 Mills Ford Install clarifier, wash down service bays 1992 Mills Ford Permit to alter spray paint booth and dry chemical system 1992 Mills Ford Permit for a gas line to spray booth area A copy of pertinent documents is included in Appendix B of this report. 4.1.8 Planning Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Planning Department (APD) Source: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/Home/View/1871 Agency Address: 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805 Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-5139 Date of Contact: April 14, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is zoned CG for Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 17 Regulatory Agency Data General Commercial development by the City of Anaheim. 4.1.9 Oil & Gas Exploration Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) Agency Address: http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/doms-app.html Agency Phone Number: (916) 322-1080 Date of Contact: April 6, 2017 Method of Communication: Online database Summary of Communication: According to DOGGR, no oil and/or gas wells are located on or adjacent to the subject property. 4.1.10 Assessor’s Office Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Orange County Public Works (OCPW) Land Records Agency Address: 333 West Santa Ana Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92701 Agency Phone Number: (714) 734-5400 Date of Contact: April 3, 2017 and April 20, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Database Summary of Communication: According to the online OCPW Land Records, the subject property is identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 250-091-009, 250- 091-010, and 2580-091-011. 4.2 Mapped Database Records Search Information from standard federal, state, county, and city environmental record sources was provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The information contained in this report was compiled from publicly available sources and the locations of the sites are plotted utilizing a geographic information system, which geocodes the site addresses. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Using the ASTM definition of migration, Partner considers the migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form onto the subject property during the evaluation of each site listed on the radius report, which includes solid, liquid, and vapor. 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary Radius Report Data Database Search Radius (mile) Subject Property Adjacent Properties Sites of Concern Federal NPL or Delisted NPL Site 1.00 N N N Federal CERCLIS Site 0.50 N N N Federal CERCLIS-NFRAP Site 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facility 1.00 N N N Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 18 Radius Report Data Database Search Radius (mile) Subject Property Adjacent Properties Sites of Concern Federal RCRA TSDF Facility 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA Generators Site (LQG, SQG, CESQG) 0.25 N N N Federal IC/EC Registries 0.50 N N N Federal ERNS Site Subject Property N N/A N State/Tribal Equivalent NPL 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Equivalent CERCLIS 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Site 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Site 0.50 Y Y N State/Tribal Registered Storage Tank Sites (UST/AST) 0.25 Y Y N State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites (VCP) 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Spills 0.50 N N N Federal Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N State Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List (HIST CORTESE) 0.50 Y N N Emissions Inventory Database (EMI) Varies Y Y N Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS) Varies Y Y N Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) Varies Y Y N EDR MGP Varies N N N EDR US Hist Auto Station Varies N Y N EDR US Hist Cleaners Varies N N N 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings The subject property is identified as an Aboveground Storage Tank (AST), Underground Storage Tank (UST), Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank, Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), and Emissions Inventory Database (EMI) site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: According to the EDR regulatory database listings, the subject property is listed as an Underground Storage Tank (UST) facility and Hazardous Substance Storage Container UST (HIST UST) site with nine (9) USTs. A HIST UST listing link to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) database identifies McCoy Motor Co. as operating from the subject property with (1) 1,000-gallon UST for unleaded fuel, one (1) transmission oil tank, two (2) motor oil tanks, three (3) waste oil tanks, and two (2) steam cleaning runoff sumps. The tank construction material, location, installation and/or removal dates, and tank capacities of eight tanks were not reported. A Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) and associated HIST CORTESE database listing dated December 5, 1989 for a release of gasoline which impacted soils was reported on the regulatory Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 19 database. The lead agency identified as the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) did not have records associated to the LUST cleanup case. The LUST was identified as a soil only case and as a closed case cleanup site on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online GeoTracker database dated June 20, 1990. Mills Ford is listed as permitted by the city of Anaheim to operate with one 2,110-gallon AST of unreported contents. Mills Ford is registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Facility Registry System Identification Number 1000139855 on the online ECHO database. No enforcement, violations, or compliance information was available on the ECHO online database. The FINDS listing is a cross-reference to a RCRA listing and identifies this facility as Registry ID 110002417037. Available HAZNET listings for Mills Ford between 1993 and 2015 include unspecified aqueous solution, unspecified solvent mixture, hydrocarbon solvents, aqueous solution with total organic residues 10 percent or more, waste oil, mixed oil, unspecified sludge waste, oil/water separation sludge, and two listing of liquids with halogenated compounds >=1,000 Milligrams per liter (Mg.L) in 1996. The reported waste was reportedly recycled, bulked, stored, and transferred off-site for disposal. In addition, Mills Ford is listed between 1987 and 2013 with oversight provided by South Coast AQMD for Emissions Inventory Database (EMI) listings. According to onsite property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, a UST and dispenser was historically removed in the late 1980s from the subject property near the center of the parcel. Mr. Mills was unaware of any additional USTs having been installed subject property. As of this date, Partner has not received a response from the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency pertaining to releases, spills, or cleanup documentation. It should be noted that the City of Anaheim Fire Department did not identify the subject property as an active UST facility. No previous subsurface investigation reports were provided or available for Partner to review during the course of this assessment. The regulatory closure of the release with oversight is considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. However without the available documentation the confirmation of the release location, UST removal, and analytical results cannot be confirmed. Based on the length of time the property has been in use for automotive related services and the number of in ground features, the former and current use are of environmental concern. 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings The adjacent property to the east is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Argo Motor Sports at 118 South Loara Street is listed as located adjacent to the east (hydrologically up to cross-gradient) of the subject property, across South Loara Street. Argo Motor Sports is listed between 2006 and 2010 as an EDR Historical Auto Station site. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 20 relative distance, lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the north is identified as a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Small Quantity Generator, Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS), and Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: A1 Auto Repair Service at 1613 West Lincoln Street is listed as located adjacent to the north (hydrologically up-gradient) of the subject property, across West Lincoln Street. A1 Auto Repair Service is listed as an RCRA-SQG generating between 100 to 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste per calendar month. HAZNET waste inventories were not reported. A1 Auto Repair Service is registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Facility Registry System Identification Number 1000595761 on the online ECHO database. No enforcement, violations, or compliance information was available on the ECHO online database. The FINDS listing is a cross- reference to the RCRA database listing and identifies this facility as Registry ID 110002854625. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the relative distance, lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the north is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Los Primos Auto Service and David’s Auto Repair at 1613 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the north (hydrologically up-gradient) of the subject property, across West Lincoln Street. These businesses were identified between 2005 and 2013 as EDR Historical Auto Station sites. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the relative distance, lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, these sites are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the north is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Discount Auto Repair and J&V Auto Repair at 1609 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the north (hydrologically up-gradient) of the subject property, across West Lincoln Street. These businesses were identified between 2001 and 2012 as EDR Historical Auto Station sites. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the relative distance, lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, these sites are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the north is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Action Muffler at 1609 West Lincoln Street is listed as located adjacent to the north (hydrologically up-gradient) of the subject property, across West Lincoln Street. Action Muffler is listed in 2002 as an EDR Historical Auto Station site. No other information or indications of Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 21 violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the relative distance, lack of violations, limited listing, and depth to groundwater, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the west is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Reyes Auto Service and T Auto Repair at 1640 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. These businesses were identified between 2005 and 2012 as EDR Historical Auto Station sites. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, these sites are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the northwest is identified as an Underground Storage Tank (UST), Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), Superfund Enterprise Management System, and Emissions Inventory Database (EMI) site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: La Habra Stucco at 1631 West Lincoln Avenue is listed as located adjacent to the northwest (hydrologically cross-gradient) of the subject property. La Habra Stucco is listed with a release of diesel fuel which reportedly impacted soil only on December 21, 2004. The lead agency, identified as City of Anaheim provided oversight during site cleanup. According to available SWRCB online GeoTracker documentation, a 12,000-gallon diesel fuel UST was removed by CHS on December 21, 2004. During tank removal activities soils collected and analyzed detected 670 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) of total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) in one sample near the dispenser. In order to fully delineate additional soils were collected to a depth of 40-feet below ground surface (bgs) in the vicinity of the former dispenser and UST. On September 15, 2005 the City of Anaheim issued a case closed no further action letter to La Habra Stucco. La Habra Products Inc. is listed from as early as 1964 on the HIST UST database with one (1) 10,000- gallon diesel UST and one (1) 5,000-gallon unleaded product UST. No further information documenting the 1964 USTs status was reported. Based on the regulatory oversight with closure, UST removal, lack of additional violations, depth to groundwater, and inferred direction of groundwater flow this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the west is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Easy Auto Paint & Body and Fast & Easy Auto Body at 1646 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. These businesses were identified between 2003 and 2010 as EDR Historical Auto Station sites. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, these sites are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 22 The adjacent property to the west is identified as a UST and HIST UST site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Aamco Transmissions at 1644 West Lincoln Street is listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. Aamco Transmissions is listed as UST facility identification number 3531 and a HIST UST facility with three USTs including one (1) 550- waste oil tank, one (1) 550-gallon transmission oil tank, and a second waste oil tank with an unreported capacity. The tank construction material and installation and/or removal dates were not reported. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the depth to groundwater and inferred direction of groundwater flow, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the west is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: B&G Auto Repair at 1644 West Lincoln Street is listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. B&G Auto Repair was identified between 2002 and 2003 as an EDR Historical Auto Station site. No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the west is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: J&G Radiator at 1648 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. J&G Radiator is listed as an RCRA-SQG generating between 100 to 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste per calendar month. HAZNET waste inventories were not reported. J&G Radiator is registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as Facility Registry System Identification Number 1000129386 on the online ECHO database. No enforcement, violations, or compliance information was available on the ECHO online database. The FINDS listing is a cross-reference to the RCRA database listing and identifies this facility as Registry ID 110002799384 . No other information or indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the lack of violations, regulatory status, depth to groundwater, and inferred direction of groundwater flow, this site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The adjacent property to the west is identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: Percy’s Auto and T Auto Repair at 1648 West Lincoln Street are listed as located adjacent to the west (hydrologically down to cross-gradient) of the subject property. These businesses were identified between 2001 and 2008 as EDR Historical Auto Station sites. No other information or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 23 indications of violations were provided in the regulatory database. Based on the lack of violations, limited listings, and depth to groundwater, these sites are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Based on the findings, vapor migration is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings No sites of concern are identified in the regulatory database report. Listed sites within the specified search radius of the subject property which appeared on local, State, or Federally published lists of sites that have had releases of hazardous substances have received regulatory closure and/or were determined to be of sufficient distance and/or situated hydrologically cross- or down-gradient such that impact to the subject property is unlikely. Based on the findings, vapor migration is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.5 Orphan Listings No orphan listings identified in the regulatory database report were found to be sites of concern. A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix C of this report. . Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 24 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the User must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31. The User should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiries is not complete. The User is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following: Review Title and Judicial Records for Environmental Liens and AULs Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User Actual Knowledge of the User Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable information Degree of Obviousness Reason for Preparation of this Phase I ESA Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. Partner requested our Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, Partner requested the following site information from Development Advisors, LLC (User of this report). User Responsibilities Item Provided By User Not Provided By User Discussed Below Does Not Apply Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs X Specialized Knowledge X Actual Knowledge X Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues X Identification of Key Site Manager Section 5.1.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA Section 1.1 Prior Environmental Reports X Other X Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 25 5.1 Interviews 5.1.1 Interview with Owner Mr. Mike Wallace, subject property owner, was not available to be interviewed at the time of the assessment. 5.1.2 Interview with Report User Please refer to Section 5.2 below for information requested from the Report User. The information requested was not received prior to the issuance of this report. Because the Report User (Client) is a potential developer/purchaser, it is understood that the Report User would not have knowledge of the property that would significantly impact our ability to satisfy the objectives of this assessment. The lack of this information is not considered to represent a significant data gap. 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager According to Mr. Ron Mills, the subject property was developed in the 1960s for automotive sales and service use. Mr. Mills stated that automotive servicing performed on the subject property was discontinued in 2010. Mr. Mills provided access to former hazardous material and waste storage areas. Mr. Mills further stated that to his knowledge all in-ground hydraulic lifts and clarifiers had been in place since original construction of the subject property buildings. Pacific Resource Recovery Services was reported by Mr. Mills as the licensed hazardous waste paint and associated liquid sludge hauler. 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants Interviews with past owners, operators and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. 5.1.5 Interview with Others As the subject property is not an abandoned property as defined in ASTM 1527-13, interview with others were not performed. 5.2 User Provided Information 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs Partner was not provided with title records or environmental lien and AUL information for review as part of this assessment. 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User No actual knowledge of any environmental lien or AULs encumbering the subject property or in connection with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 26 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No knowledge of valuation reductions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The User did not provide information that is commonly known or reasonably ascertainable within the local community about the subject property at the time of the assessment. 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation No previous reports or other pertinent documentation was provided to Partner for review during the course of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 27 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The weather at the time of the site visit was sunny and clear. Refer to Section 1.5 for limitations encountered during the field reconnaissance and Sections 2.1 and 2.2 for subject property operations. The table below provides the site assessment details: Site Assessment Data Site Assessment Performed By: Ramiro Vejar Site Assessment Conducted On: April 17, 2017 The table below provides the subject property personnel interviewed during the field reconnaissance: Site Visit Personnel for 1600 West Lincoln Avenue (Subject Property) Name Title/Role Contact Number Site Walk* Yes/No Ron Mills Key Site Manager (714) 776-1331 Yes * Accompanied Partner during the field reconnaissance activities and provided information pertaining to the current operations and maintenance of the subject property Environmental concerns were identified during the onsite reconnaissance related to current and former storage, use, and generation of hazardous substances, signs of a release, and subsurface lifts, drains, and clarifiers, as further discussed in Sections 6.1 and 6.2. 6.1 General Site Characteristics 6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste generated at the subject property is disposed of in commercial dumpsters located on the subject property. An independent solid waste disposal contractor, removes solid waste from the subject property. No evidence of illegal dumping of solid waste was observed during the Partner site reconnaissance. 6.1.2 Sewage Discharge and Disposal Sanitary discharges on the subject property are directed into the municipal sanitary sewer system. The City of Anaheim services the subject property vicinity. No wastewater treatment facilities or septic systems are observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.3 Surface Water Drainage Storm water is removed from the subject property primarily by sheet flow action across the paved surfaces towards storm water drains located throughout the subject property and in the public right of way. The subject property is connected to a municipal owned and maintained sewer system. The subject property does not appear to be a designated wetland area, based on information obtained from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service; however, a comprehensive wetlands survey would be required in order to formally determine actual wetlands on the subject property. No surface impoundments, wetlands, natural catch basins, settling ponds, or lagoons are located on the subject property. No drywells were identified on the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 28 6.1.4 Source of Heating and Cooling Heating and cooling systems as well as domestic hot water equipment are fueled by electricity and natural gas provided by Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. Heating and cooling is provided in the buildings by rooftop mounted packaged HVAC units. Hot water heating equipment was not observed. 6.1.5 Wells and Cisterns No aboveground evidence of wells or cisterns was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.1.6 Wastewater Domestic wastewater generated at the subject property is disposed by means of the sanitary sewer system. No industrial process is currently performed at the subject property. 6.1.7 Septic Systems No septic systems were observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.8 Additional Site Observations Two prefabricated spray paint booths were observed near the center of the subject property. The spray paint booths were in use during the site reconnaissance and Partner was unable to verify that any subsurface features were present within the spray booths. The paint booths are actively permitted with oversight provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD). No open NOVs or NOCs were on file for the subject property with the AQMD. No additional general site characteristics were observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards 6.2.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site Partner identified hazardous substances used, stored, and/or generated on the subject property as noted in the following table: Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products Noted Onsite Substance Container Size Location Nature of Use Disposal Method Waste Paints 2x 30-gallon drum South of Spray Paint Booths Automotive Spray Painting Transported off-site by Pacific Resource Recovery Services 2085B Compliant Cleaning Solvent 1x 30-gallon drum South of Spray Paint Booths Parts Washer Transported off-site by Pacific Resource Recovery Services Aqueous Parts Washer Unknown South of Spray Paint Booths Parts Washer Transported off-site by Pacific Resource Recovery Services Paint Thinner 2x 1-gallon cans Paint Booth Shop Automotive Spray Painting N/A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 29 Hazardous Substances and/or Petroleum Products Noted Onsite Substance Container Size Location Nature of Use Disposal Method Paint Remover 3x 1-gallon cans Paint Booth Shop Automotive Spray Painting N/A Envirobase Spray Paints Various approximately 1 quart size Paint Booth Shop Automotive Spray Painting N/A Waste oil 5x 5-gallon containers RV Solutions Shop Minor Servicing N/A The materials were found to be properly labeled at the time of the assessment with no signs of leaks, stains, or spills. Secondary containment is not provided. Based on the nature of use and overall small quantities observed, hazardous materials associated to automotive paint operations are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. However, secondary containment is recommended for all drums. 6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) No evidence of current or former ASTs or USTs was observed during the site reconnaissance. However a concrete foundation on the east of the detailing bays and west of the offices was reported by the property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, as the former location of a UST for fuel dispensing. Mr. Mills further stated that the UST was removed in the late 1980s. 6.2.3 Evidence of Releases De minims staining near the compressor room and on the concrete slab of the maintenance storage room were observed. The compressor room was observed with oily buildup surrounding a drain leading from compressor equipment. The maintenance storage room was equipped with an approximately 3” diameter drain. The maintenance storage room was previously the hazardous material storage room. On the east of the maintenance storage room exterior Partner also observed piping protruding from the concrete and a two-stage clarifier on the exterior. According to the property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, the piping was presumably used for previous compressor equipment. Mr. Mills further stated that all drains on the subject property are connected to clarifier equipment prior to entering the public sewer system. No spills, stains or other indications that a surficial release has occurred at the subject property were observed. 6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Older transformers and other electrical equipment could contain PCBs at a level that subjects them to regulation by the U.S. EPA. PCBs in electrical equipment are controlled by United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations 40 CFR, Part 761. Under the regulations, there are three categories into which electrical equipment can be classified: 1) Less than 50 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs – “Non-PCB;” 2) 50 ppm-500 ppm – “PCB-Contaminated;” and, 3) Greater than 500 ppm – “PCB-Containing.” The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 30 manufacture, process, or distribution in commerce or use of any PCB in any manner other than in a totally enclosed manner was prohibited after January 1, 1977. The on-site reconnaissance addressed indoor and outdoor transformers that may contain PCBs. One pad- mounted transformer was observed on the subject property. The transformer is not labeled indicating PCB content. No staining or leakage was observed in the vicinity of the transformer. Southern California Edison maintains ownership and operational responsibility for the transformer. Based on the good condition of the equipment, the transformer is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. During the onsite reconnaissance, Partner observed the presence of approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts. According to the property manager Mr. Ron Mills, the lifts were presumed to have been installed during the construction of the current buildings in the 1960s. Polychlorinated Biphenyl’s (PCB’s) were used in the past in dielectric fluids and oils in a variety of equipment, including hydraulic-lifting equipment and may be present in the hydraulics. No other potential PCB-containing equipment (interior transformers, oil-filled switches, hoists, lifts, dock levelers, hydraulic elevators, balers, etc.) was observed on the subject property during Partner’s reconnaissance. 6.2.5 Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors No strong, pungent or noxious odors were evident during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.6 Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.7 Drains, Sumps and Clarifiers In addition to the previously discussed clarifier in section 6.2.3 on the exterior of the maintenance storage room, an automotive washing and detailing business operates from the northwest building has two active floor drains which are reportedly connected to a single-stage clarifier. Partner observed the single stage clarifier on the east bay of the northwest building. Lastly, the third clarifier system observed located on the southwest of the subject property was observed during the site reconnaissance as receiving recreational vehicle washing waste water from associated floor drains. According to the property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, he presumes the clarifiers were installed at the time of building construction. The clarifiers are reportedly regularly serviced by Evergreen and receive only detergents from washing operations. The clarifiers have the potential to impact the subsurface of the subject property should the systems become compromised. 6.2.8 Pits, Ponds and Lagoons No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on the subject property. 6.2.9 Stressed Vegetation No stressed vegetation was observed on the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 31 6.2.10 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards No additional environmental hazards, including landfill activities or radiological hazards, were observed. 6.3 Non-ASTM Services 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Asbestos is the name given to a number of naturally occurring, fibrous silicate minerals mined for their useful properties such as thermal insulation, chemical and thermal stability, and high tensile strength. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires certain construction materials to be presumed to contain asbestos, for purposes of this regulation. All thermal system insulation (TSI), surfacing material, and asphalt/vinyl flooring that are present in a building constructed prior to 1981 and have not been appropriately tested are “presumed asbestos-containing material” (PACM). The subject property buildings were constructed in 1966. Partner has conducted a limited, visual evaluation of accessible areas for the presence of suspect ACMs at the subject property. The objective of this visual survey was to note the presence and condition of suspect ACM observed. Please refer to the table below for identified suspect ACMs: Suspect ACMs Suspect ACM Location Friable Yes/No Physical Condition Drywall Systems Office Interiors No Good/Isolated Damage* Floor Tiles Office Interiors No Good Floor Tile Mastic Office Interiors No Good Spray-Applied Acoustical Material Office Interiors Yes Good/Isolated Damage* Drop Down Acoustical Tiles Office Interiors Yes Good/Isolated Damage* *Water damaged building materials were observed in the RV Service Solutions building and a vacant office building on the northwest. The limited visual survey consisted of noting observable materials (materials which were readily accessible and visible during the course of the site reconnaissance) that are commonly known to potentially contain asbestos. This activity was not designed to discover all sources of suspect ACM, PACM, or asbestos at the site; or to comply with any regulations and/or laws relative to planned disturbance of building materials such as renovation or demolition, or any other regulatory purpose. Rather, it is intended to give the User an indication if significant (significant due to quantity, accessibility, or condition) potential sources of ACM or PACM are present at the subject property. Additional sampling, assessment, and evaluation will be warranted for any other use. Partner was not provided building plans or specifications for review, which may have been useful in determining areas likely to have used ACM. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 32 According to the US EPA, ACM and PACM that is intact and in good condition can, in general, be managed safely in-place under an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Program until removal is dictated by renovation, demolition, or deteriorating material condition. Prior to any disturbance of the construction materials within this facility, a comprehensive ACM survey is recommended. 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Due to the commercial nature of use of the subject property, LBP was not considered within the scope of this assessment. However, based on the 1960s construction, the presence pf LBP is assumed. 6.3.3 Radon Radon is a colorless, odorless, naturally occurring, radioactive, inert, gaseous element formed by radioactive decay of radium (Ra) atoms. The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones, according to the table below: EPA Radon Zones EPA Zones Average Predicted Radon Levels Potential Zone 1 Exceed 4.0 pCi/L Highest Zone 2 Between 2.0 and 4.0 pCi/L Moderate Zone 3 Less than 2.0 pCi/L Low It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the US EPA recommends site-specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Radon sampling was not conducted as part of this assessment. Review of the US EPA Map of Radon Zones places the subject property in Zone 3. Based upon the radon zone classification, radon is not considered to be a significant environmental concern. 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water According to available information, a public water system operated by the APU serves the subject property vicinity. According to the 2016 Water Quality Report, shallow groundwater beneath the subject property is not utilized for domestic purposes. The sources of public water for the City of Anaheim are local groundwater and surface water imported from Northern California and the Colorado River. According to the City of Anaheim and the 2016 Water Quality Report, water supplied to the subject property is in compliance with all State and Federal regulations pertaining to drinking water standards, including lead and copper. Water sampling was not conducted to verify water quality. 6.3.5 Mold Molds are microscopic organisms found virtually everywhere, indoors and outdoors. Mold will grow and multiply under the right conditions, needing only sufficient moisture (e.g.in the form of very high Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 33 humidity, condensation, or water from a leaking pipe, etc.) and organic material (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, paper, or natural fiber carpet padding). Partner observed accessible, interior areas for the subject property buildings for significant evidence of mold growth with the exceptions detailed in Section 1.5 of this report; however, this ESA should not be used as a mold survey or inspection. Additionally, this limited assessment was not designed to assess all areas of potential mold growth that may be affected by mold growth on the subject property. Rather, it is intended to give the client an indication as to whether or not conspicuous (based on observed areas) mold growth is present at the subject property. This evaluation did not include a review of pipe chases, mechanical systems, or areas behind enclosed walls and ceilings. The following indications of water damage or mold growth were observed during Partner’s visual assessment: Mold Observations Location of area affected Condition Drop Down Acoustic Ceiling Tile – RV Solutions Building Water stained Spray Applied Acoustic Material/Drywall at the vacant offices on the northwest Water damaged with mold The vacant offices on the northwest were observed with water damaged building materials and mold. 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance The adjacent property reconnaissance consisted of observing the adjacent properties from the subject property premises. No items of environmental concern were identified on the adjacent properties during the site assessment, including hazardous substances, petroleum products, ASTs, USTs, evidence of releases, PCBs, strong or noxious odors, pools of liquids, sumps or clarifiers, pits or lagoons, stressed vegetation, or any other potential environmental hazards. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 34 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Findings A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: According to the available historical documentation, the subject property was developed with the current structures and associated subsurface features by 1966 for automotive maintenance service, repair, auto body, and sales. During the onsite reconnaissance, Partner observed the following features capable of impacting the subsurface: approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts, a compressor room with staining surrounding a floor drain, a former hazardous waste storage room (currently maintenance storage room) with stained concrete foundation surrounding a floor drain which is reportedly connected to a two-stage clarifier, automotive washing and detailing with two active floor drains reportedly connected to a single-stage clarifier, recreational vehicle washing with associated floor drains connected to a four-stage clarifier, prefabricated spray paint booths, storage of waste paints within 30-gallon drums (without secondary containment), and one recreational vehicle sanitary waste dump station which is reportedly connected to the sewer system. Polychlorinated Biphenyl’s (PCB’s) were used in the past in dielectric fluids and oils in a variety of equipment, including hydraulic-lifting equipment. According to the EDR regulatory database listings, the subject property is listed as an Underground Storage Tank (UST) facility and Historical UST (HIST UST) site with nine (9) USTs. A HIST UST listing link to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) database identifies McCoy Motor Co. as operating from the subject property with (1) 1,000-gallon UST for unleaded fuel, one (1) transmission oil tank, two (2) motor oil tanks, three (3) waste oil tanks, and two (2) steam cleaning runoff sumps. The tank construction material, location, installation and/or removal dates, and tank capacities of eight tanks were not reported and the current occupants were not knowledgeable about past operations. Operations began at a time of little to no regulatory oversight, as such during redevelopment activities the potential to encounter additional subsurface features cannot be completely ruled out. A Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) case dated December 5, 1989 which reportedly impacted soils was listed on the regulatory database. The lead agencies identified as the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) did not have records for the LUST cleanup case. The LUST was identified as a closed case cleanup site on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online GeoTracker database dated June 20, 1990. The information indicates that this was a soil only case. According Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 35 to onsite property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, a UST and dispenser was removed in the late 1980s from the subject property near the center of the parcel; however Mr. Mills was unaware of any additional USTs. As of this date, Partner has not received a response from the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency pertaining to releases, spills, or cleanup documentation. It should be noted that the City of Anaheim Fire Department did not identify the subject property as an active UST facility. No previous subsurface investigation reports were provided or available for Partner to review during the course of this assessment. The regulatory closure of the release with oversight is considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition. Partner cannot confirm the former UST location, actual removal, or soil analytical results. Based on the length of time automotive servicing and repair operations have been conducted onsite (approximately 51 years), hazardous material storage and generated waste, current staining, lack of subsurface investigations, lack of information regarding the disposition of the eight SWRCB registered tanks at the facility, hydraulic lifts, and clarifier systems, the historical use, subsurface features, and current condition are considered a recognized environmental condition. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: See REC above for closed LUST case. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Due to the age of the subject property buildings, there is a potential that asbestos-containing material (ACM) and/or lead-based paint (LBP) are present. A few areas of the building materials including ceiling drywall, acoustic ceiling materials, and drop down ceiling tiles were noted during the assessment to have signs of water damage. The identified suspect ACMs would need to be Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 36 sampled to confirm the presence or absence of asbestos prior to any renovation or demolition activities to prevent potential exposure to workers and/or building occupants. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed evidence of recognized environmental conditions and an environmental issue in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends the following: A limited subsurface investigation should be conducted in order to determine the presence or absence of soil and/or groundwater contamination due to the historical use of the subject property. Prior to demolition, a demolition level asbestos survey and abatement, if required, must be performed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 37 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property located at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report. By signing below, Partner declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR §312. Partner has the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. Partner has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Prepared By: Ramiro Vejar Environmental Scientist Reviewed By: Debbie Stott, P.G. Senior Author Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-177713.1 April 28, 2017 Page 38 9.0 REFERENCES Reference Documents American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13. Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Radius Report, April 2017 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via internet, April 2017 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via internet, April 2017 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, accessed via the internet, April 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Map of Radon Zones (Document EPA-402-R-93-071), accessed via the internet, April 2017 United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet, April 2017 United States Geological Survey Topographic Map 2015, 7.5 minute series, accessed via internet, April 2017 FIGURES 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2 SITE PLAN 3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP Project No. 16- 177713.1 Drawing Not To Scale KEY: Subject Property FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN Project No. 17-177713.1 KEY: Subject Property GROUNDWATER FLOW Loara Elementary School 1601 W. Broadway Pampas Apartments 1631 West Pampas Lane Infinity Contractors 225 S. Loara St. S O U T H L O A R A S T R E E T Mu l t i -te n a n t A u t o m o t i v e 16 4 0 -16 4 8 W . L i n c o l n A v e . CTS Cement Manufacturing 1631 W. Lincoln Ave. Automotive Businesses 1617, 1615, 1613, 1611, 1609 W. Lincoln Avenue Vacant Unimproved WEST LINCOLN AVENUE Unoccupied 1566 W. Lincoln Embassy Fitness 1567 Embassy 118 S. Loara Multi-Tenant Industrial 1566 Embassy Emazing Group 220 S. Loara EMBASSY STREET Maintenance Room Clarifier RV Clarifier Detail Clarifier Removed UST LIFTS Approx. X4 X6 LIFTS Approx. X5 X6 Office Storage Solutions RV Office/Storage LIFTS X3 X2 Hertz Offices Mills Offices RV Dump Station Drains Drains Compressor Room Spray Booth Drains FIGURE 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Project No. 16-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 2015 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1.View of the subject property form the northeast looking southwest. 3.View of the car sales lot on the north. 5.View of the RV Solutions occupied building on the southeast. 2.View of the Hertz auto sales tenant space on the north. 4.View of vacant offices on the northwest. 6.View of the Mills Collision building on the east. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 7.View of a pad-mounted transformer on the northeast. 9.View of the reported former UST and fuel dis- pensing location, now a concrete slab. 11.View of the RV covered parking on the south- ern buildings. 8.View of the detail service building on the north- west. 10.View of the southwest service building and spray paint booth location. 12.View of an RV domestic waste dumps station on the east building exterior. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 13.View of RV Service Solutions building interior. 15.View of a water damaged ceiling tile within RV Solutions. 17.View of a lift within the southeast building. 14.View of mezzanine storage room within the RV Solutions building. 16.View of a former lift location and bay on the southeast building. 18.View of the shop and waste oil storage within an RV Solution service bay. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 19.View of the maintenance storage room. 21.View of protruding pipes on the east of the storage room—reportedly former compressor line. 23.View of a drain on the west of the maintenance room. 20.View of the clarifier on the east of the mainte- nance storage room. 22.View of the maintenance storage room interior. 24.View of the detailing and car wash building to the northwest. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 25.View of the detail shop to the northwest and typical in-ground lift. 27.View of the clarifier in the northwest detail building. 29.View of staining and absorbent within the com- pressor room. 26.View of a floor drain in the northwest detail building. 28.View of the compressor room on the south- west. 30.View of staining surrounding the compressor room drain. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 31.View of the west building and collision center bays. 33.View of the southeast of the west building in- cluding a RV washing water tank 35.View of the drains reportedly connected to the RV clarifier. 32.View of the west building and collision center bays with lifts. 34.View of the water tank and RV washing clarifier. 36.View of a storm water drain on the south. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 37.View of the paint booths. 39.View of the paint shop. 41.View of the typical offices. 38.View of stored paints. 40.View of stored waste paints and paint equip- ment washing area. 42.View of water damaged ceiling tiles within the vacant offices to the northeast. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 43.View of the adjacent unoccupied building with ongoing improvements to the east. 45.View of the adjacent property to the northwest. 47.View of the adjacent multi-tenant businesses to the east and southeast. 44.View of the adjacent multi-tenant automotive building to the west. 46.View of the adjacent automotive businesses to the north. 48.View of the adjacent building to the south. APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 17-177713.1 APPENDIX B: HISTORICAL/REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1938 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1953 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1963 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1972 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1977 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1987 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1990 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 1995 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 2005 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 2009 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 2010 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 16-177713.1 Date of Photograph: 2012 KEY: Subject Property Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 1600 West Lincoln 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92802 April 06, 2017 4901213.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification # Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: PO # Project 04/06/17 1600 West Lincoln Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 Anaheim, CA 92802 Torrance, CA 90501-0000 4901213.3 Colleen Tubridy The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 3F53-4E57-B5C8 NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 16-177713.1 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 3F53-4E57-B5C8 Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4901213 3 2 1600 West Lincoln 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92802 Inquiry Number: 4901213.5 April 07, 2017 The EDR-City Directory Abstract 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2014. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 2014 EDR Digital Archive - X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2010 EDR Digital Archive - X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2005 EDR Digital Archive - X X - EDR Digital Archive X X X - 2002 Haines Company ---- 2001 Pacific Telephone - --- 1997 Pacific Bell - --- 1995 Pacific Bell X X X - 1992 Pacific Bell - --- 1991 Pacific Bell X X X - 4901213-5 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1986 Pacific Bell X X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone X X X - 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.X X X - Luskeys Brothers & Co.X X X - Pacific Telephone X X X - 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc.- --- 1970 General Telephone Co., of California X X X - Ross Publications X X X - 1966 Pacific Telephone X X X - 1965 Ross Publications, Inc.,- --- 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co.,- X X - 1960 Unknown - --- 1956 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.- --- 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.- X X - 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co.- --- 1950 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.- X X - 1946 Southern California Telephone Co.- --- 1945 Western Directory Co.- --- 1936 Western Directory Co.- --- 1930 Western Directory Co.- --- 1926 Pacific Telephone - --- 1925 Western Directory Co.- --- 1922 Kaasen Directory Co.- --- 1921 Western Directory Co.- --- 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co.- --- 4901213-5 Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SELECTED ADDRESSES The following addresses were selected by the client, for EDR to research. An "X" indicates where information was identified. Address Type Findings 1561 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 1609 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 1611 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 1615 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 1640 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 1642 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered 1644 West Lincoln Avenue Client Entered X 225 South Loara Street Client Entered X 104 South Loara Street Client Entered X 4901213-5 Page 3 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1600 W est Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92802 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. LINCOLN 1600 LINCOLN Year Uses Source 1941 Yorde Paul H r Southern California Telephone Co. LINCOLN AVE W 1600 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 MCCOY FORD W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications W Lincoln Ave 1600 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 MCCOY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive RV SERVICE SOLUTIONS EDR Digital Archive 2010 MCCOY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive 2005 MC COY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive PROPERTY INVESTORS PARTNERSHIP EDR Digital Archive SOUTHWEST-TEX LEASING CO INC EDR Digital Archive WARPAR LLC EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1600 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 MCCOY FORD MILLS FORD Pacific Bell MILLS FORD Pacific Bell 1991 Mc Coy Ford Mills Ford Pacific Bell Mills Ford Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 4 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 MILLS FORD Pacific Bell 1980 MILLS FORD Pacific Telephone 1975 Car Rental & Leasing Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. MC COY FORD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Car Rental & Leasing General Telephone Co., of California MCO FORD General Telephone Co., of California 1966 MC COY FORD Pacific Telephone Mc Coy Motor Co Auto Div Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 5 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. EMBASSY ST 1532 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 EVERGLOW CO INC EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1536 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 SPECK GABRIEL ENGINEERING CO EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1537 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 ANSPACH ROY INC EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1541 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 ACE BRAKE WAREHOUSE INC EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1542 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 AMBASSADOR SAUNA EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications LANGE CONSTRUCTION CO EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1544 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 AUTHORIZED SUPPLY CORP EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1545 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 AYERST ENGINEERING INC EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1546 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 KEN-LEE PROFILING EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 4901213-5 Page 6 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 KENYON MACHINE ENGINEERING EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1549 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 SPACE AGE ELASTOMERS EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1552 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1555 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 LION NOTIONS OF SOU CALIF INC EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1556 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 JACK X CHANGE EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1558 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 SAFETQUIP CORP EMBASSY ANH Ross Publications 1563 EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 BAL CORP EMBASSY AV ANH Ross Publications LINCOLN 1561 LINCOLN Year Uses Source 1995 Anaheim Door Co 6611724 Pacific Bell Anaheim Door Co 6611724 Pacific Bell 1619 LINCOLN Year Uses Source 1970 YELLOW CAB CO OF GARDEN GROVE STANTON & LOS ALAMITOS General Telephone Co., of California 4901213-5 Page 7 Year Uses Source FINDINGS LINCOLN AVE W 1533 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 EARL S PLUMBING INC THE W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications EARL S PLUMBING INC THE W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1557 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 EK SPORTS CENTER W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1561 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 KIRKLAND ED L VET W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications ANH DOG & CAT HOSP W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1563 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 ANAHEIM POODLE PARLOR W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1566 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 ACE FIXTURE CO W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1568 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 PBX REAL ESTATE INC W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications HFRC W LINCOLN ANH Ross Publications 1615 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 ADVANCE AUTO SAFETY CNTRS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications BRUNDIGE BILL NATL AUTO GLASS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 4901213-5 Page 8 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1621 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 CLEM SCHMITT-ADV & DESIGNS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1631 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 LAHABRA PRODUCTS INC W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1640 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 GOODWAY COPY CENTER W LINCOLN ANH Ross Publications 1644 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS W LINCOLN ANH Ross Publications 1650 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 TR MOTORS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1652 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 FAMILY HOFBRAU W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1654 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 ARTISTIC CARPETS OF ANH W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1658 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 COIN CENTER W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1659 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 QUALITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 4901213-5 Page 9 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1660 LINCOLN AVE W Year Uses Source 1970 BLUE CHIP STAMPS REDEMPTION STRS W LINCLN ANH Ross Publications LOARA ST N 214 LOARA ST N Year Uses Source 1970 W ILSON CLAUDE PLUMBING CONTR N LOARA ANH Ross Publications 221 LOARA ST N Year Uses Source 1970 ECONOMY GLASS N LOARA ANH Ross Publications 225 LOARA ST N Year Uses Source 1970 KING O LAW N DISTRS INC N LOARA ANH Ross Publications LOARA ST S 118 LOARA ST S Year Uses Source 1970 THOMPSON PRINTING S LOARA ANH Ross Publications MANCHESTER 137 MANCHESTER Year Uses Source 1995 MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Bell MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Bell 246 MANCHESTER Year Uses Source 1970 POWER TOL & SUPLY CO General Telephone Co., of California MANCHESTER N 200 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 Garden City fruits The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4901213-5 Page 10 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1950 Twin Pines Motel 5042 Hoag RA The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 226 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 Morocco Drive In restr The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 228 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 8962Samon J The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 240 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 Square Deal Tailer Sis The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Greenstreet M Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 244 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 0 & M Painting & Sign Serv The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Walter W G carp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 246 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 Citrus Reaming Equip Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 270 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 Grigsby R A The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Freeway Motel The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 275 MANCHESTER N Year Uses Source 1950 City limits The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Harrison T E pumps The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Smiley Heating Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. MANCHESTER AVE 211 MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Nottingham P L Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 11 Year Uses Source FINDINGS MANCHESTER AVE N 137 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 MANCHESTER KEN CLARK AUTO SALVAGE N MNCHSTR ANH Ross Publications 200 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 BIG O TIRES N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 216 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 MOLTZ RED & ASSOCS N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 226 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 COUNTRY GIRL BAR & GRILL N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 246 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 ANH POWER TOOL & SUP N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications AIR FASTENERS SALES INC N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 255 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 STYLECRAFT MFG N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 264 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 ALL BEARING SERVICE INC N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 266 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 DYNAMIC DESIGN INDUSTRIES N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications 4901213-5 Page 12 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 270 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 FREEWAY MOTELS N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 273 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 GUARANTEE AUTO PAINTING N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications 275 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 GEAR HOUSE AUTO PARTS N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 300 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 BROADWAY MOTEL N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 303 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 NIAGARA CHEMICAL N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 309 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 ACE S N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications 315 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 BROWN VIC CABINET SHOP N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications BOUAS LEONARD V CONTR N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 329 MANCHESTER AVE N Year Uses Source 1970 ACRS CO N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications ROYAL PLUMBING & HEATING CO N MANCHESTER ANH Ross Publications RITEMP CO N MANCHESTER AV ANH Ross Publications 4901213-5 Page 13 Year Uses Source FINDINGS N LOARA ST 100 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1980 Buer Edw R Pacific Telephone 101 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Oestreich E Pacific Bell 102 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 J PFRKINS o KE 1 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 104 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Marston G J Pacific Bell 110 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Parsons J G Pacific Bell Young L Pacific Bell 115 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1991 Auga Emile M Pacific Bell 1986 Auga Emile M Pacific Bell 1975 Auga Emile M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Spencer Scane E Mrs The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 119 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Contreras Martin Pacific Bell Llamas Jalme Pacific Bell Renterla Alicia Pacific Bell 1991 Salas Leonardo Pacific Bell 1986 Padilla Apolonio Pacific Bell 1975 Malm Gregory Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Felegy John M Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1955 Van Bebber J E The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Roberts Benj S The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4901213-5 Page 14 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 191 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1970 Pope Francis D L General Telephone Co., of California 203 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1991 Superior Upholstering Pacific Bell 205 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1975 SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY Customer Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 214 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Lancaster Motors Foreign Car Repairs Pacific Bell 1991 Lancaster Motors Foreign Car Repairs Pacific Bell 1986 Lancaster Motors Foreign Car Repairs Pacific Bell Crowley Enterprises Pacific Bell 1975 J & J AUTO ELECTRIC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Schmitz R J Enterprises General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Wilson Claude plmbng contr Pacific Telephone 1961 VACANT Luskey Brothers & Co., 1955 Harrison Thos E pumps The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Park Lawn Sprinkler System Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 221 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 Economy Glass Service Pacific Bell Economy Auto Specialties Pacific Bell 1991 Economy Glass Service Pacific Bell 1986 Economy Glass Service Pacific Bell 1980 E CON OMY IMPORT AUTO PARTS Pacific Telephone E CON OMY GLAS S S E RVICE Pacific Telephone 1975 ECONOMY GLASS SERVICE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Economy Glass Co General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Economy Glass Co Pacific Telephone 1961 DALMAR GLASI 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 4901213-5 Page 15 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 225 N LOARA ST Year Uses Source 2014 ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE STN EQP EDR Digital Archive 2010 ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE STN EQP EDR Digital Archive HEANEY BRIAN EDR Digital Archive 2005 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS INC EDR Digital Archive ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE STN EQP EDR Digital Archive 1995 Orange County Service Station Equip & Tank Testin 30 Pacific Bell Anaheim Communications Pacific Bell 1986 ORAN GE COUN TY S E RVICE S TATION E QUIP Pacific Bell 1980 I Orange County Service Station Equi P Pacific Telephone 1975 Orange County Service Station Equip Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 ing OLawn DIstrs Inc General Telephone Co., of California King of Spain Apartments General Telephone Co., of California 1961 VACANT Luskey Brothers & Co., SPRR INt S Luskey Brothers & Co., 1955 Muckenthaler L A Peerless Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Peerless Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. N MANCHESTER AVE 137 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Bell 1991 MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Bell 1980 From Downey Telephones Call Pacific Telephone From Beach Area Telephones Call Pacific Telephone 1975 MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 MANCHESTER KEN CLARK AUTO SALVAGE General Telephone Co., of California 1966 CLARK KEN MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Telephone Ken Clark Manchester Auto Salvage Pacific Telephone MANCHESTER KEN CLARK AUTO SALVAGE Pacific Telephone 1961 MANCHESTER AUTO Luskey Brothers & Co., SALVAGE KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., MANCHESTER AUTO Luskey Brothers & Co., SALVAGE KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 4901213-5 Page 16 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 140 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Pacific Carblide Pacific Bell 1991 Pacific Carbide Pacific Bell 146 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP Pacific Bell 200 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Discount Auto Mart Pacific Bell 1991 Anaheim Auto Mart Pacific Bell 1986 Big Joe Tires Pacific Bell Gehnnger Auto Repair Pacific Bell Spirnaks Big Joe Tires Pacific Bell 1975 BIG JOE TIRES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. SPIRNAKS BIG JOE TIRES Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 BIG O TIRES Pacific Telephone 1961 0 K RUBBER Luskey Brothers & Co., WLDRS TIRES PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 211 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Builders Carpet & Drapery Co General Telephone Co., of California 216 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Builders Carpet & Drapery Co Pacific Bell 1986 Builders Carpet & Drapery Co Pacific Bell 1980 Builders Carpet & Drapery Co Pacific Telephone 1975 Builders Carpet & Drapery Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Drapery Workroom Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DRAPERY WORLD STYLE INTERIORS Sales Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 PROFESSIONAL RESUME SERVICE General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Rousselle Termite Co Inc Pacific Telephone Roan Builders Inc Pacific Telephone Professional Resume Serv Pacific Telephone ORANGE COAST ORTHOTIG & PROSTHETIC CENTER Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 17 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Hermes Co Pacific Telephone Eastmont Builders Inc Pacific Telephone 1961 TALMON CONSTR PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., BLDG CONTRS PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., RIJANO INC Luskey Brothers & Co., MIL MAR CONSTR PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., LATHING PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., J & J SPRAY Luskey Brothers & Co., ELFORD EMP SERV Luskey Brothers & Co., AGCY PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 226 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Mexi Casa Mexican Food Pacific Bell 1991 Mexi Casa Mexican Food Pacific Bell 1986 Mexi Casa Mexican Food Pacific Bell 1980 i Pacific Telephone 1975 Mexi Casa Mexican Food Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Country Girl The General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Country Girl Restaurant Pacific Telephone Stanley D C rl est Pacific Telephone 233 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1970 Earls W holesale Supply Co The General Telephone Co., of California 242 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Radan Construction Pacific Bell Radan Construction Pacific Bell Professional Printers Pacific Bell 1991 ORCO APARTMENTS SUPPLY INC Pacific Bell 1986 ORCO APARTME N T S UPPLY CO Pacific Bell 1966 DAME WOOD PRODUCTS cabnts Pacific Telephone 1961 DAME WOOD PRODTS KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 244 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1961 VACANT Luskey Brothers & Co., 1950 Markham Fred S The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4901213-5 Page 18 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 246 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Phillips Company Pacific Bell 1991 Flame Products Pacific Bell Phillips Company Pacific Bell Administrative Offices Pacific Bell Phillips Company Pacific Bell 1986 Flame Products Pacific Bell PHILLIPS COMPANZ Pacific Bell 1980 Air Fastener Sales Pacific Telephone Air Fasteners Sales Inc Pacific Telephone Air Filter Sales & Service Co Pacific Telephone Anaheim Power Tool & Supply Pacific Telephone Phillips Wmn T Pacific Telephone 1975 Air Fasteners Sales Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anaheim Power Tool & Supply Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Phillips Wm T Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. POWER TOOL & SUPPLY CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 AIR EXPRESS DIV OF REA EXPRESS General Telephone Co., of California Air Fasteners Sales Inc General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Power Tool & Supply General Telephone Co., of California Phillips Wn T General Telephone Co., of California POWER TOL & SUPLY CO General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Anaheim Power Tool & Supply Pacific Telephone PHILLIPS WM T Pacific Telephone POWER TOOL & SUPPLY CO Pacific Telephone 1961 POWER TOOL & SUP KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 1950 Cal Flo Citrus Reaming Equipt Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Citrus Reaming Equipt Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 250 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Tn Star Landscape Management Pacific Bell From Norwalk Telephones Call Pacific Bell 1986 Gardner Jack Company Pacific Bell 1980 KE E LE R ADVE RTIS IN G S PE CIALTIE S Pacific Telephone Gardner Jack Company Pacific Telephone 1975 Orange Hills Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 4901213-5 Page 19 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Vintage Cellars W ine Warehouse & Tasting Room Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 UNDERWOOD CORP See Olivetti Corporation of America General Telephone Co., of California Olivetti Underwood Customers Service General Telephone Co., of California Olivetti Corporation of America General Telephone Co., of California Grant H S & Associates General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Underwood Corp Pacific Telephone OLIVETTI UNDERWOOD CORP Pacific Telephone Culligan & Mc Callum Inc Pacific Telephone 1961 ASSN KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., TON PNTRS KE 3 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., WILSON & HAMP Luskey Brothers & Co., 255 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Ph Pllip SCompany W arehouse Pacific Bell 1966 National Auto Painting Systems Inc Pacific Telephone 264 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Kaman Industrial Technologies Corporation Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim Branch Pacific Telephone 1975 Anaheim Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 ALL BEARING SERV INC General Telephone Co., of California 1966 ALL BEARING SERV INC Pacific Telephone 1961 NO RETURN Luskey Brothers & Co., 266 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 CGRConstruction Pacific Bell 1980 L Pacific Telephone L Fr Pom Powney Taephones Call Pacific Telephone 1975 Renco C General Contractors Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Coast Imports General Telephone Co., of California 1966 ANAHEIM SPEED ENGINEERS Pacific Telephone 1961 FEDERATED PURCH ASER ELECTRONIC Luskey Brothers & Co., COMPONENTS PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 4901213-5 Page 20 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 270 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Freeway Motel Pacific Bell 1986 Choux International Inc Pacific Bell Freeway Motel Pacific Bell 1980 Freeway Motel Pacific Telephone 1975 FREEWAY MOTEL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 FREEWAY MOTEL General Telephone Co., of California 1966 FREEWAY MOTELS Pacific Telephone 1961 FREEWAY MOTEL KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 1950 Freeway Motel The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Grigsby R A r The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 271 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1961 HADERLIES CAFE Luskey Brothers & Co., 273 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Terra Paclfica Pacific Bell 1991 Extrusion Die Co Pacific Bell 1986 Anaheim Collision Specialists Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Crowley Enterprises Pacific Telephone Lancaster Motors Foreign Car Repairs Pacific Telephone 1975 Lancaster Motors Foreign Car Repairs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Vans Vettes & Cycles Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Say On Paint & Body Shop General Telephone Co., of California 1966 ANAHEIM AUTO REPAIRS Pacific Telephone 1961 PENHALL CONCRETE SAWING & BREAK Luskey Brothers & Co., ING KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., PENHALL CONCRETE SAWING & BREAK Luskey Brothers & Co., ING P PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 275 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Advantage Fire Control Systems Inc Pacific Bell 1986 Silva Peter Auto Detail Pacific Bell 1980 i Auto Clinic Pacific Telephone Domans Brake And Gear House Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 21 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Gear House Pacific Telephone Gear House The Pacific Telephone 1975 Gear House auto prts Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. DORNONS BRAKE SERVICE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Dornons Bra Ise Service General Telephone Co., of California 1966 GEAR HOUSE auto pts Pacific Telephone 1961 AUTOMATIC Luskey Brothers & Co., TRANSMISSION SER KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., GEAR HSE KE 5 aa 8033 15 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 300 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Patel Dilip Pacific Bell Naek Pradip G&Tarulata Pacific Bell Broadway Motel Pacific Bell 1991 Naik Pradip G & Tarulata Pacific Bell Broadway Motel Pacific Bell 1986 Naik Pradip G & Tarulata Pacific Bell Broadway Motel Pacific Bell 1980 Naik Pradip G & Tarulata Pacific Telephone 1975 BROADWAY MOTEL Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 BROADWAY MOTEL General Telephone Co., of California 1966 BROADWAY MOTEL Pacific Telephone 303 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 B C Cabinets Pacific Bell 1991 Ftster David Paul Pacific Bell Stone Deck Pacific Bell 1986 Rustlick Of Calif Pacific Bell Rust Lick Of Calif Pacific Bell 1980 Rust Llck Of Calif Pacific Telephone 1975 Rustlick Of Calif Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Rust Lick Of Calif Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Rust Lick of Calif General Telephone Co., of California Rustlick of Calif General Telephone Co., of California A M Blending Co General Telephone Co., of California 1966 NIAGARA CHEMICAL DIVISION FMC CORPORATION Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 22 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1961 NIAGARA CHEM Luskey Brothers & Co., DIVISION KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 1950 Elmer A W Anaheim Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Anaheim Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 309 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 EI Dos De Oros Pacific Bell 1991 Dans Hideaway Pacific Bell 1986 Dans Hideaway Pacific Bell 1970 Aces General Telephone Co., of California 1961 ACES INN K 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 315 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Bouas Leonard V contr Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Brown Vic Cabinet Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Bouas Leonard V contr General Telephone Co., of California Brown Vic Cabinet Shop General Telephone Co., of California 1966 BOUAS LEONARD V contr Pacific Telephone BROWN VIC CABINET SHOP Pacific Telephone 1961 BROWN VICTOR Luskey Brothers & Co., CBT KE 5 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 329 N MANCHESTER AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Conger & Associates Pacific Bell 1991 Enviro Com Pacific Bell Metro Lubrication Equip Pacific Bell Orange County Lubrication Equipment Pacific Bell 1986 Jones Bubby Pacific Bell Metro Gallery Pacific Bell Orange County Lubrication Equipment Pacific Bell 1975 RITEMP CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Royal Plumbing & Heating Co General Telephone Co., of California Ritemp Co General Telephone Co., of California Acrs Co General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Royal Plumbing & Heating Co Pacific Telephone 1961 HALMARK DNTL Luskey Brothers & Co., 4901213-5 Page 23 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1961 LABY KE 3 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., HALMARK DNTL Luskey Brothers & Co., LABY KE 3 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., N MANCHESTER PL 137 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Ken Clark Manchester Auto Salvage The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. MANCHESTER AUTO SALVAGE KEN CLARK The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 242 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Dame Wood Products cabnts The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 244 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1950 W alter W erner The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 246 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Power Tool & Supply Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 250 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Anaheim Equipt Rentals The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 270 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Grigsby R A The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Freeway Motel The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 271 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Quality Concrete Products The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 275 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Gearhouse auto pts The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Harrison Thos E pumps The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4901213-5 Page 24 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 303 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Anaheim Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Elmer A W Anaheim Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. NIAGARA CHEMICAL DIV The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 309 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 Aces Inn The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 329 N MANCHESTER PL Year Uses Source 1955 W alker & Lee Inc The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. S LOARA ST 102 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1966 FEDERAL MOGUL SERV auto pts Pacific Telephone 1961 NO RETURN Luskey Brothers & Co., 110 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1995 J & L Enterprise Pacific Bell 115 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1966 Kipp Geo Mrs Pacific Telephone 1955 Booms L The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. S Loara St 118 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 BICYCLE SOURCE EDR Digital Archive PACIFIC STONE CONSTRUCTION INC EDR Digital Archive ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive BICYCLE SOURCE EDR Digital Archive PACIFIC STONE CONSTRUCTION INC EDR Digital Archive ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive 2010 ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 25 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2010 ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive 2005 ARGO MOTORSPORTS EDR Digital Archive J T AUDIO & ACCESSORIES EDR Digital Archive ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive ARGO MOTORSPORTS EDR Digital Archive J T AUDIO & ACCESSORIES EDR Digital Archive ARGO ENTERPRISES EDR Digital Archive S LOARA ST 118 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1975 Prototype Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Thompson Printing Co General Telephone Co., of California Lowel Company General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Thompson Printing Co Pacific Telephone 1961 VACANT Luskey Brothers & Co., MAf l E INTA Luskey Brothers & Co., 121 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 JM CROYSRY a PQ Luskey Brothers & Co., RP 4 5 PR 2 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., fi DIAMONO MFRS Luskey Brothers & Co., 123 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 EDn HAPVY Luskey Brothers & Co., MOORE Luskey Brothers & Co., 6 MA KFY Luskey Brothers & Co., 125 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 ML HAf FMFI TVR Luskey Brothers & Co., 128 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 HP MOHNEN Luskey Brothers & Co., 4901213-5 Page 26 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 135 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1980 Huntle JD Pacific Telephone 157 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1961 W M Hr ND OK a 9 K PPR 4 aa Luskey Brothers & Co., 206 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1980 Briney Frank E Pacific Telephone S Loara St 212 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2010 AJ MOTORS EDR Digital Archive AJ MOTORS EDR Digital Archive 2005 AJ MOTORS EDR Digital Archive A2 EXPRESS TOW ING & TRANSPORT EDR Digital Archive AJ MOTORS EDR Digital Archive A2 EXPRESS TOWING & TRANSPORT EDR Digital Archive 220 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 ROCORP INVESTMENTS INC EDR Digital Archive ROJAS SPICES COMPANY EDR Digital Archive SALSA SPICES INC EDR Digital Archive FOMAR IMPORT/EXPORT INC EDR Digital Archive FOMAR IMPORT/EXPORT INC EDR Digital Archive ROJAS SPICES COMPANY EDR Digital Archive SALSA SPICES INC EDR Digital Archive ROCORP INVESTMENTS INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 LOVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH EDR Digital Archive FOMAR IMPORT/EXPORT INC EDR Digital Archive ROCORP INVESTMENTS INC EDR Digital Archive ROJAS SPICES COMPANY EDR Digital Archive CHOICE ONE HOMES REALTY EDR Digital Archive LOVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH EDR Digital Archive FOMAR IMPORT/EXPORT INC EDR Digital Archive ROCORP INVESTMENTS INC EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 27 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2010 ROJAS SPICES COMPANY EDR Digital Archive CHOICE ONE HOMES REALTY EDR Digital Archive 2005 K P METAL FINISHING INC EDR Digital Archive K P METAL FINISHING INC EDR Digital Archive 225 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 EXPLORELED EDR Digital Archive LOARA STREET PARTNERS 2014 LLC EDR Digital Archive ONESOLUTION LIGHT AND CONTROL EDR Digital Archive INFINITY DRYWALL CONTG INC EDR Digital Archive LEDWORKS EDR Digital Archive ONESOLUTION LIGHT AND CONTROL EDR Digital Archive INFINITY DRYWALL CONTG INC EDR Digital Archive LEDWORKS EDR Digital Archive LOARA STREET PARTNERS 2014 LLC EDR Digital Archive EXPLORELED EDR Digital Archive 2010 ONESOLUTION LIGHT AND CONTROL EDR Digital Archive LEDWORKS EDR Digital Archive ONESOLUTION LIGHT AND CONTROL EDR Digital Archive LEDWORKS EDR Digital Archive 2005 NSI ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING EDR Digital Archive NSI ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING EDR Digital Archive 235 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive 2005 QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive QUICK START BOOSTERS INC EDR Digital Archive 240 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 EMAZING LIGHTS LLC EDR Digital Archive INTO AM CLOTHING LLC EDR Digital Archive EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive INTO AM CLOTHING LLC EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 28 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 EMAZING LIGHTS LLC EDR Digital Archive EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive 2010 EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive 2005 EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive VISWRTEK EDR Digital Archive EDGE CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY EDR Digital Archive VISWRTEK EDR Digital Archive 241 S Loara St Year Uses Source 2014 MALOY W ILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive MALOY W ILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive 2010 MALOY WILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive MALOY WILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive 2005 MALOY WILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive WMADM INC EDR Digital Archive WMADM INC EDR Digital Archive MALOY WILLIAM CO EDR Digital Archive S LOARA ST 0140 S LOARA ST Year Uses Source 1980 Tayek W m D Pacific Telephone South Loara Street 104 South Loara Street Year Uses Source 1995 Marston G J Pacific Bell 225 South Loara Street Year Uses Source 1995 Calif Lawnmower Products Pacific Bell Orange County Service Station Equip & Tank Testin 30 Pacific Bell Anaheim Communications Pacific Bell 1991 Calif Lawnmower Products Pacific Bell California Lawns & Landscaping Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 29 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1991 Calif Leaguer The Pacific Bell 1986 ORAN GE COUN TY S E RVICE S TATION E QUIP Pacific Bell 1980 I Orange County Service Station Equi P Pacific Telephone 1975 Orange County Service Station Equip Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 KING O LAWN DISTRS INC N LOARA ANH Ross Publications King of Spain Apartments General Telephone Co., of California ing OLawn DIstrs Inc General Telephone Co., of California 1961 VACANT Luskey Brothers & Co., SPRR INt S Luskey Brothers & Co., 1955 Peerless Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Muckenthaler L A Peerless Spray Chemical Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. W EMBASSY AVE 1542 W EMBASSY AVE Year Uses Source 1980 Ashley R Thomas & Associates Pacific Telephone 1566 W EMBASSY AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Body Shop Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. W EMBASSY ST 1532 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 Pacific W estline Pacific Bell 1991 Pacific Westline Pacific Bell 1986 Authorized Supply Corp Pacific Bell 1980 Authorized Supply Corp Pacific Telephone From Downey Telephones Call Pacific Telephone 1975 AUTHORIZED SUPPLY CORP Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Delta Lite General Telephone Co., of California Delta Pacific Corp General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Everglow Gas Lamps Pacific Telephone EVERGLOW CO INC Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 30 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1537 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1991 Sentry Fire Protection Inc Pacific Bell Kern Morton 6 Pacific Bell Kern Miriam& Michael @Brea@ Pacific Bell Kern Mechanical Pacific Bell 1986 Pacific W estline Pacific Bell 1980 All Diameter Grinding Pacific Telephone 1975 ANSPACH ROY INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ROY ANSPACH INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 ROY ANSPACH INC General Telephone Co., of California ANSPACH ROY INC General Telephone Co., of California 1966 ANSPACH ROY INC Pacific Telephone ROY ANSPACH INC Pacific Telephone W Embassy St 1541 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2010 TAI SPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive TAI SPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive 2005 CREST CABINETS INC EDR Digital Archive CREST CABINETS INC EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1541 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 Crest Cabinets Pacific Bell 1975 Ace Brake W hse Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Ace Brake Whse Inc General Telephone Co., of California 1542 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1986 Apparel Graphics Pacific Bell Dela Carpet Corp Pacific Bell 1980 IMPE RIAL ALARM S CRE E N S OFW N AHE IM Pacific Telephone 1975 Brandt Development LTD Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Lange Industries Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ashley R Thomas & Associates Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 4901213-5 Page 31 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 Lange Industries Inc General Telephone Co., of California Ambassador Sauna General Telephone Co., of California 1544 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1975 W ebster Distributors Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Ritschel Distributors Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 AUTHORIZED SUPPLY CORP General Telephone Co., of California W Embassy St 1545 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 MANLEY STEEL RULE DIE CORP EDR Digital Archive MANLEY STEEL RULE DIE CORP EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1545 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 MANLEY STEEL RULE DIE CORP Pacific Bell 1991 MANLEY STEEL RULE DIE CO Pacific Bell 1975 AYERST ENGINEERING INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 AYERST ENGINEERING INC General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Vermax Gauge Inc Pacific Telephone 1546 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1986 Advertising Graphics Pacific Bell 1980 Advertising Graphics Pacific Telephone 1548 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1970 Chemn Sonlcs Corp General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Apagee Tool & Engineering Pacific Telephone W Embassy St 1549 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2010 GB SALES EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 32 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2010 ORANGE COUNTY FLYERS EDR Digital Archive GB SALES EDR Digital Archive ORANGE COUNTY FLYERS EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1549 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 Contrx Service Center Pacific Bell 1991 Redhill Systems Pacific Bell 1986 Cryogenic Components Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Cryomec Inc Pacific Telephone 1970 AII Nu Products Inc General Telephone Co., of California W Embassy St 1552 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive 2010 NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive S AND S MACHINERY SLS EDR Digital Archive S AND S MACHINERY SLS EDR Digital Archive NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive 2005 NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive NEWPORT ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1552 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 S & S Machinery Sales Inc Pacific Bell 1991 Double Eleven Pacific Bell Canvas City Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 33 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Simpl Cau I S Euclid @Anaheim@ Pacific Telephone Si n Division Pacific Telephone Simpl Ic It Y Eng uneelun Pacific Telephone 1975 Simplex Time Recorder Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Simplex Time Recorder Co General Telephone Co., of California 1554 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1986 Allied Heat Treating Co Pacific Bell Burch Theodore F Pacific Bell 1980 Allied Heat Treating Co Pacific Telephone 1970 Globe Auto Glass Co General Telephone Co., of California 1966 BEST PRINTING CO Pacific Telephone W Embassy St 1555 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 SIGNATURE KITCHEN AND BATH INC EDR Digital Archive PACIFIC STONE DESIGN CTR INC EDR Digital Archive PACIFIC STONE DESIGN CTR INC EDR Digital Archive SIGNATURE KITCHEN AND BATH INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 PACIFIC STONE DESIGN CTR INC EDR Digital Archive AAA REMODELING INC EDR Digital Archive PACIFIC STONE DESIGN CTR INC EDR Digital Archive AAA REMODELING INC EDR Digital Archive 2005 NUBIC INC EDR Digital Archive DCS DIVERSIFIED INC EDR Digital Archive NUBIC INC EDR Digital Archive DCS DIVERSIFIED INC EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1555 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1986 Embassy Automotive Warehouse Pacific Bell 1980 Jenel CCo Pacific Telephone 1975 Van Wood & Co whsle flowrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Wood Van & Co whsle flowrs Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Lion Notions of So Calif Inc General Telephone Co., of California 4901213-5 Page 34 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1966 Trio Sales Co Inc Pacific Telephone W Embassy St 1556 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 LUXOR IMPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION INC EDR Digital Archive LUXOR IMPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION INC EDR Digital Archive LUXOR IMPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive LUXOR IMPORTS INC EDR Digital Archive FANTASIA DISTRIBUTION INC EDR Digital Archive 2005 MR DISTRIBUTOR EDR Digital Archive MR DISTRIBUTOR S T USA EDR Digital Archive SULTAN TOBACCO USA INC EDR Digital Archive MR DISTRIBUTOR S T USA EDR Digital Archive SULTAN TOBACCO USA INC EDR Digital Archive MR DISTRIBUTOR EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1556 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1991 Louvers International Pacific Bell 1986 JACKXCHAN GE Pacific Bell JackEx Change Pacific Bell Far West Tool Co Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Far Weso Tool Co Inc Pacific Telephone From Downey Telephones Call Pacific Telephone Jack Ex Change Pacific Telephone 1975 Jack Ex Change Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 JACK X CHANGE General Telephone Co., of California Jack Ex Change General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Jack X Change Pacific Telephone Jack Exch Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 35 Year Uses Source FINDINGS W Embassy St 1559 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 HYDRO HERBAL EDR Digital Archive HYDRO HERBAL EDR Digital Archive 2010 HYDRO HERBAL EDR Digital Archive HYDRO HERBAL EDR Digital Archive 2005 LYNETTE DECOR PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive LYNETTE DECOR PRODUCTS EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1559 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 Lynette Decor Products Pacific Bell 1991 Lynette Decor Products Pacific Bell Lynette Decor Products Pacific Bell 1986 LYN E TTE DE COR PRODUCTS Pacific Bell Lynette Decor Products Pacific Bell 1980 I AME C Pacific Telephone Lynette Decor Products Pacific Telephone LYN E TTE N ATION AL Pacific Telephone 1975 Natl Picture Frame Mfg Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 CALART artfcl flowrs Pacific Telephone CALIF ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS Pacific Telephone 1562 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1991 MCCUNE AUDIO VISUAL VIDEO Pacific Bell MCCUNE SOUND SERVICE Pacific Bell Mc Cune Sound Pacific Bell 1986 MC CUN E HARRY S OUN D S E RVICE Pacific Bell MC CUN E AUDIOVIS UAL Pacific Bell MC CUN E S OUN D S E RVICE Pacific Bell W Embassy St 1563 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 ADVANCED SURFACES INC EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 36 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 AUSSIE PET MOBILE ORANGE CTY EDR Digital Archive ADVANCED SURFACES INC EDR Digital Archive AUSSIE PET MOBILE ORANGE CTY EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1563 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1975 Scoobie Enterprises Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Scoobie Enterprises Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 B A L Corp General Telephone Co., of California W Embassy St 1566 W Embassy St Year Uses Source 2014 BONDED BY INTEGRITY EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive DRIZZLE STUDIOS EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive DRIZZLE STUDIOS EDR Digital Archive BONDED BY INTEGRITY EDR Digital Archive 2010 JAESO STUDIO EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive ONE DAY SIGNS INC EDR Digital Archive JAESO STUDIO EDR Digital Archive 2005 R & S AUTOMATION INC EDR Digital Archive R & S AUTOMATION INC EDR Digital Archive W EMBASSY ST 1566 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1995 Customs Creations Pacific Bell 1970 Body Shop General Telephone Co., of California MCO FORD General Telephone Co., of California 1567 W EMBASSY ST Year Uses Source 1991 Mc Leod Tool & Gage Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 37 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Mc Leod Tool & Gage Pacific Bell 1980 Mc Leod Tool & Gage Pacific Telephone 1970 Qualified Systems Inc General Telephone Co., of California 1966 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Pacific Telephone W LINCOLN AVE 1533 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Anaheim Pacific Bell Anaheim Pacific Bell 1986 Anaheim Pacific Bell Earls Country Kitchen The accesrs Pacific Bell E ARLS BATH & KITCHE N S HOPS THE Pacific Bell 1980 Amuin hni Pacific Telephone Anaheim Pacific Telephone 1975 Earl V Neliesen Luskeys Brothers & Co. EAT V NELLESEN Pacific Telephone Anaheim Main Office Sales & Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sales & Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Earls Bathroom Boutique Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Earls Plumbing Inc The Anaheim Main Office General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Main Office General Telephone Co., of California THE EARLS PLUMBING INC General Telephone Co., of California Sales & Service General Telephone Co., of California Earls Plumbing Inc The Anaheim Main Office General Telephone Co., of California Warehouse General Telephone Co., of California 1541 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 AALTOS GRAPHICS Pacific Bell Anahelm Pacific Bell 1991 Aamco Transmissions Pacific Bell 1955 Kabrich J P Westside Building Material Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Westside Building Material Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Westside Building Material Corp The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1950 Vista Furn Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 4901213-5 Page 38 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1557 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Guerrero Auto Sales Pacific Bell 1991 Ron Browns Auto Center Pacific Bell Top Performers Pacific Bell Automotive Concepts Pacific Bell 1980 AN AHE IM S IJBARU Pacific Telephone iubaru Of Anaheim Pacific Telephone 1975 PACIFIC MOTOR IMPORTS INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. P M I Leasing Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 West Anaheim Marine General Telephone Co., of California E K Sports Center General Telephone Co., of California 1966 CENTRAL RAMBLER INC Pacific Telephone CENTRAL RAMBLER INC Pacific Telephone 1561 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Lin Shyng DVM MPVM Pacific Bell Real Joseph J DVM Pacific Bell 1991 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Lin Shyng DVMMPVM Pacific Bell 1986 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone i LTsak Drago DVM Pacific Telephone Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone 1975 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dean C Ross @Anaheim@ Dog & Cat Hospital Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California Butler Jack Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone Kirkland Ed L Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 39 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1955 Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1563 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1986 AN AHE IM POODLE PARLOR Pacific Bell 1975 ANAHEIM POODLE PARLOR Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 ANAHEIM POODLE PARLOR Pacific Telephone W Lincoln Ave 1566 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2010 CAL W OOD EDR Digital Archive RICHARD N MENDENHALL ENTPS EDR Digital Archive KESKIN GROUP NA EDR Digital Archive KESKIN GROUP NA EDR Digital Archive CAL WOOD EDR Digital Archive RICHARD N MENDENHALL ENTPS EDR Digital Archive 2005 MENDENHALL RICHARD N ENTPS EDR Digital Archive MENDENHALL RICHARD N ENTPS EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1566 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 CALIFORNIA WOODW ORKING MACHINERY CO Pacific Bell 1991 CALIFORNIA WOODWORKING MACHINERY CO Pacific Bell 1986 CAUFORN IA W OODW ORKIN G MACHIN E RY CO Pacific Bell 1980 MACHIN E RY CO Pacific Telephone 1975 CALIFORNIA WOODWORKING MACHINERY CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. W Lincoln Ave 1568 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 STAR AUTO SMOG EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 40 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 STAR AUTO SMOG EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1568 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Dyna Gym Of Orange County Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bedroom The Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 CUSTOM FURNITURE RENTAL CORP General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Watkins Carpet Cleaning Pacific Telephone BUILDERS CONTRACT INTERIORS Pacific Telephone W Lincoln Ave 1600 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 RV SERVICE SOLUTIONS EDR Digital Archive MCCOY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive 2010 MCCOY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive 2005 SOUTHW EST-TEX LEASING CO INC EDR Digital Archive MC COY MOTOR CO EDR Digital Archive PROPERTY INVESTORS PARTNERSHIP EDR Digital Archive WARPAR LLC EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1607 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1950 Anaheim Animal Hospital The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. W Lincoln Ave 1609 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 2010 J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 2005 J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive J & V AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 41 Year Uses Source FINDINGS W LINCOLN AVE 1609 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 K &K AUTO REPAIR CENTER Pacific Bell 1986 Crescent Auto Repair Pacific Bell 1980 Bnundlge Bil Nat I Auto Glass Pacific Telephone W Lincoln Ave 1610 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2010 AAR W IRELESS LLC EDR Digital Archive AAR W IRELESS LLC EDR Digital Archive 1611 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive 2010 LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive 2005 LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive LINCOLN SMOKE CHECK EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1611 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 D & N Auto Discount Brake & Tire Service Pacific Bell 1986 S P R Foreign Auto Repair Pacific Bell 1980 HE RBS FORE IGN CAR S E RVICE Pacific Telephone Herbs Foreign Car Prts Pacific Telephone 1975 Herbs Foreign Car Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. W Lincoln Ave 1613 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 DAVIDS AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 42 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2014 DAVIDS AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 2010 LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive 2005 LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1613 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Preferred Customers Automotive Pacific Bell 1991 Magic W indow Tinting Pacific Bell 1986 Randys Enginuity Pacific Bell 1980 RUS S AUTO S E RVICE Pacific Telephone 1975 Russ Auto Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Anaheim Motorcycle Rental & Assemblers General Telephone Co., of California W Lincoln Ave 1615 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 ARCE MUFFLERS EDR Digital Archive ACTION MFFLER A CAL LTD PARTNR EDR Digital Archive ACTION MFFLER A CAL LTD PARTNR EDR Digital Archive ARCE MUFFLERS EDR Digital Archive 2010 ARCE MUFFLERS EDR Digital Archive ARCE MUFFLERS EDR Digital Archive 2005 ACTION MUFFLER EDR Digital Archive ACTION MUFFLER EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1615 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Action Muffler Pacific Bell 1991 Action Muffler Pacific Bell 1986 ACTION MUFFLE R Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim National Auto Glass Co Pacific Telephone Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Pacific Telephone 1975 NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 4901213-5 Page 43 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Brundige Bill Natl Auto Glass Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ACTION MUFFLER Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California ACTION MUFFLER General Telephone Co., of California Bill Brundise National Auto Glass General Telephone Co., of California Brundige Bill Nati Auto Glass General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Pacific Telephone Brundige Bill Natl Auto Glass Pacific Telephone NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM Pacific Telephone W Lincoln Ave 1617 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 AR CAR RENTAL EDR Digital Archive AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive AR CAR RENTAL EDR Digital Archive AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive 2010 AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive 2005 GOMES SUSAN PATRICIA EDR Digital Archive QUINTERO RICARDO HORACIO EDR Digital Archive AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive AUTO REGIO EDR Digital Archive GOMES SUSAN PATRICIA EDR Digital Archive QUINTERO RICARDO HORACIO EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1617 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Red Fox Camera Center Pacific Bell Redfox Camera Rentals Pacific Bell Redfox Photographic Rentals Pacific Bell 1986 Red Fox Camera Center Pacific Bell Redfox Camera & Audio Visual Inc Pacific Bell Redfox Camera Rentals Pacific Bell Redfox Photographic Rentals Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 44 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Red Fox Camera Center Pacific Telephone Redfox Camera Rentals Pacific Telephone 1966 Nationwide Safti Brake Centers Anaheim Pacific Telephone 1621 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1975 Rajas Cycle Painting Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Cycle Painting Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1622 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Agul ar Angela Pacific Bell 1623 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1955 W illiams J B The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. W Lincoln Ave 1631 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 C T S CEMENT MANUFACTURING EDR Digital Archive LA HABRA STUCCO DIV OF LA HABR EDR Digital Archive C T S CEMENT MANUFACTURING EDR Digital Archive LA HABRA STUCCO DIV OF LA HABR EDR Digital Archive 2010 C T S CEMENT MANUFACTURING EDR Digital Archive LA HABRA STUCCO DIV OF LA HABR EDR Digital Archive C T S CEMENT MANUFACTURING EDR Digital Archive LA HABRA STUCCO DIV OF LA HABR EDR Digital Archive 2005 PAREXLAHABRA INC EDR Digital Archive PAREXLAHABRA INC EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1631 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 LA HABRA STUCCO DIV OF LA HABRA PRODUCTS Anaheim Pacific Bell Sales Order Desk Pacific Bell 1991 Sales Order Desk Pacific Bell 1986 Sales Order Desk Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 45 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1980 Sales Order Desk Pacific Telephone From @Los Angeles@ Telephones Call Pacific Telephone 1975 LA HABRA PRODUCTS INC Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 LA HABRA PRODUCTS INC General Telephone Co., of California 1966 LA HABRA PRODUCTS INC Pacific Telephone La Habra Stucco Co See La Habra Products Inc Pacific Telephone LAHABRALITE CO See La Habra Products Inc Pacific Telephone 1955 La Habra Stucco Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Lahabralite Co The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. LA HABRA STUCCO CO The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. W Lincoln Ave 1640 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 NINO AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive NINO AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive 2010 NINO AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive NINO AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1640 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 MDCustom Bikes Pacific Bell 1991 M D Custom Bikes Pacific Bell Emard Door Service Of @Brea@ Placentla Pacific Bell Emard Door Service Of Anaheim Fullerton Pacific Bell Emard Door & Gate Service Pacific Bell 1986 Scuba Toys & Schools Inc Pacific Bell 1980 S CUBA S CHOOLS v Pacific Telephone 1975 SCUBA SCHOOLS OF ANAHEIM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Anaheim Ofc General Telephone Co., of California GOODWAY COPY CENTERS General Telephone Co., of California 4901213-5 Page 46 Year Uses Source FINDINGS W Lincoln Ave 1644 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 MARTINEZ TIRES & WHEELS EDR Digital Archive V4AUTOMOTIVE EDR Digital Archive V4AUTOMOTIVE EDR Digital Archive MARTINEZ TIRES & WHEELS EDR Digital Archive 2010 MARTINEZ TIRES & WHEELS EDR Digital Archive MARTINEZ TIRES & WHEELS EDR Digital Archive 2005 B & G SMOG EDR Digital Archive B & G SMOG EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1644 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1986 Anaheim Pacific Bell 1975 Anaheim Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 AMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS General Telephone Co., of California Aamco Automatic Transmissions General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim General Telephone Co., of California AMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim General Telephone Co., of California W Lincoln Ave 1646 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive 2010 ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive 2005 ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive ANAHEIM AUTO BODY EDR Digital Archive 1648 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 2010 T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 47 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2010 T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive 2005 T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive OVERHEAD DOOR EMERGENCY SVC EDR Digital Archive T AUTO REPAIR EDR Digital Archive OVERHEAD DOOR EMERGENCY SVC EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1648 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Overhead Door Emergency Service Pacific Bell Emard Door & Gate Service Pacific Bell Emard Door & Gate Service Pacific Bell Overhead Door Emergency Service Pacific Bell 1991 Overhead Door Emergency Service Pacific Bell J & G Radiator Service Pacific Bell Emard Door & Gate Service Pacific Bell 1986 J & G RADIATOR S E RVICE Pacific Bell 1980 Si& G JADIATOR S E RVICE Pacific Telephone 1975 J & G RADIATOR SERVICE Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Taylor System The General Telephone Co., of California W Lincoln Ave 1650 W Lincoln Ave Year Uses Source 2014 EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive R AND A SMOG EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive R AND A SMOG EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive 2010 EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive PALAZIOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive POWER SPORTS CONNECTION EDR Digital Archive PALAZIOS AUTO SERVICE EDR Digital Archive EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 48 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2010 POWER SPORTS CONNECTION EDR Digital Archive 2005 GATE OPERATOR EMERGENCY SVC EDR Digital Archive EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive C&J AUTO REPAIR & TOWING SERVI EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive GATE OPERATOR EMERGENCY SVC EDR Digital Archive EMARD CORP EDR Digital Archive C&J AUTO REPAIR & TOWING SERVI EDR Digital Archive JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERY EDR Digital Archive W LINCOLN AVE 1650 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1986 KAMAf LS AUTO RE PAIR Pacific Bell 1980 T R MOTORS Pacific Telephone 1975 Helmuts V Dub Transaxle Clinic Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 TR Motors General Telephone Co., of California 1652 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Time Out Sports Bar Pacific Bell 1991 Radan Construction Pacific Bell 1986 Geons Gilbert Pacific Bell Distillery The Pacific Bell 1980 I Elies Place Pacific Telephone 1975 Ellies Place Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Family Hofbrau General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Family Hofbrau Pacific Telephone 1654 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1975 GENUINE PARTS CO Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Discount Lighting Center Kelly Prell Lighting Inc Pacific Telephone KELLY PRELL LIGHTING INC Pacific Telephone 1658 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1995 Moms Thrift Pacific Bell 4901213-5 Page 49 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 Jesco Furniture & Carpets Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 COIN CENTER Pacific Telephone 1659 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Rolllt Motors Pacific Bell 1986 Dory Ent Pacific Bell Alexander Motors Pacific Bell 1980 Coastline Auto Brokers Pacific Telephone 1975 Trucks & Recreational Vehicles Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 QUALITY CONCRETE PRODUCTS Pacific Telephone 1660 W LINCOLN AVE Year Uses Source 1991 Super Discount Bed & Furniture Pacific Bell 1986 Super Discount Bed & Furniture Pacific Bell 1980 American Handicrafts Merribee Needlearts Pacific Telephone Mernibee Needlearts Pacific Telephone 1975 Merribee Needlecraft Co Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1966 Anaheim Pacific Telephone Blue Chip Stamp Co Pacific Telephone W Pampas Ln 1631 W Pampas Ln Year Uses Source 2014 J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive 2010 J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive MADRID FASHIONS EDR Digital Archive MADRID FASHIONS EDR Digital Archive J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive 2005 J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive GT ENTERPRISES INC EDR Digital Archive J K PROPERTIES INC EDR Digital Archive GT ENTERPRISES INC EDR Digital Archive 4901213-5 Page 50 Year Uses Source FINDINGS West Lincoln Avenue 1561 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1995 Real Joseph J DVM Pacific Bell Lin Shyng DVM MPVM Pacific Bell Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Anaheim Door Co 6611724 Pacific Bell Anaheim Door Co 6611724 Pacific Bell 1991 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Lin Shyng DVMMPVM Pacific Bell 1986 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone i LTsak Drago DVM Pacific Telephone 1975 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Dean C Ross @Anaheim@ Dog & Cat Hospital Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California Butler Jack Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital General Telephone Co., of California ANH DOG & CAT HOSP W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications KIRKLAND ED L VET W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications 1966 Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone Kirkland Ed L Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital Pacific Telephone 1955 Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. Dean C Ross Anaheim Dog & Cat Hospital The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. 1609 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1995 K &K AUTO REPAIR CENTER Pacific Bell 1986 Crescent Auto Repair Pacific Bell 1980 Bnundlge Bil Nat I Auto Glass Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 51 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1611 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1995 D & N Auto Discount Brake & Tire Service Pacific Bell 1986 S P R Foreign Auto Repair Pacific Bell 1980 Herbs Foreign Car Prts Pacific Telephone HE RBS FORE IGN CAR S E RVICE Pacific Telephone 1975 Herbs Foreign Car Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1615 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1995 Action Muffler Pacific Bell 1991 Action Muffler Pacific Bell 1986 ACTION MUFFLE R Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim National Auto Glass Co Pacific Telephone Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Pacific Telephone 1975 Brundige Bill Natl Auto Glass Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ACTION MUFFLER Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 ADVANCE AUTO SAFETY CNTRS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications BRUNDIGE BILL NATL AUTO GLASS W LINCOLN AV ANH Ross Publications NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM General Telephone Co., of California ACTION MUFFLER General Telephone Co., of California Bill Brundise National Auto Glass General Telephone Co., of California Brundige Bill Nati Auto Glass General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Bill Brundige National Auto Glass Pacific Telephone Brundige Bill Natl Auto Glass Pacific Telephone NATL AUTO GLASS OF ANAHEIM Pacific Telephone 1640 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1995 MDCustom Bikes Pacific Bell 1991 Emard Door & Gate Service Pacific Bell Emard Door Service Of Anaheim Fullerton Pacific Bell Emard Door Service Of @Brea@ Placentla Pacific Bell M D Custom Bikes Pacific Bell 1986 Scuba Toys & Schools Inc Pacific Bell 1980 S CUBA S CHOOLS v Pacific Telephone 4901213-5 Page 52 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1975 SCUBA SCHOOLS OF ANAHEIM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 GOODWAY COPY CENTERS General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Ofc General Telephone Co., of California GOODWAY COPY CENTER W LINCOLN ANH Ross Publications 1644 West Lincoln Avenue Year Uses Source 1986 Anaheim Pacific Bell 1975 Anaheim Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 1970 AMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS General Telephone Co., of California AAMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS W LINCOLN ANH Ross Publications Aamco Automatic Transmissions General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim General Telephone Co., of California AMCO AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim General Telephone Co., of California 4901213-5 Page 53 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 0140 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 100 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 101 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 102 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 102 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 104 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 104 South Loara Street 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 110 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 115 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 115 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 118 LOARA ST S 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 118 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 118 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 118 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 119 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 121 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 123 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 125 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 128 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 135 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 MANCHESTER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 137 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 140 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 146 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1532 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1532 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1533 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1533 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1536 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1537 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1537 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1541 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1541 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1541 W Embassy St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1541 W Embassy St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1541 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1542 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1542 W EMBASSY AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1542 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1544 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1544 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1545 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1545 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1545 W Embassy St 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1545 W Embassy St 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1546 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1546 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1548 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1549 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1549 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1549 W Embassy St 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1549 W Embassy St 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1552 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1552 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1552 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1552 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1554 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1555 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1555 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1555 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1555 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1556 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1556 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1556 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1556 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1557 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1557 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1558 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1559 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1559 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1559 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1561 LINCOLN 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1561 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1561 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1561 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1562 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1563 EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1563 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1563 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1563 W Embassy St 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1563 W Embassy St 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1563 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W EMBASSY AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W Embassy St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W Lincoln Ave 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W Lincoln Ave 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1566 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1567 W EMBASSY ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1568 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1568 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1568 W Lincoln Ave 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1568 W Lincoln Ave 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 157 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1600 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1607 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1609 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1609 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1609 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1609 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1610 W Lincoln Ave 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1610 W Lincoln Ave 2014, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1611 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1611 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1611 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1611 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1613 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1613 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1613 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1615 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1615 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1615 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1615 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1615 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1617 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1617 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1617 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1619 LINCOLN 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1621 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1621 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1622 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1623 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 W Pampas Ln 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1631 W Pampas Ln 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1640 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1640 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1640 W Lincoln Ave 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1640 W Lincoln Ave 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1640 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1642 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1644 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1644 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1644 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1644 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1644 West Lincoln Avenue 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1646 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1646 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1648 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1648 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1648 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1650 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1650 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1650 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1650 W Lincoln Ave 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1652 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1652 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1654 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1654 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1658 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1658 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1659 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1659 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1660 LINCOLN AVE W 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1660 W LINCOLN AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 191 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 200 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 200 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 200 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 203 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 205 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 206 S LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 211 MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 211 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 212 S Loara St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 212 S Loara St 2014, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 214 LOARA ST N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 214 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 216 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 216 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 220 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 220 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 221 LOARA ST N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 221 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 LOARA ST N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 N LOARA ST 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 N LOARA ST 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 225 South Loara Street 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 226 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 226 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 226 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 228 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 233 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 235 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 235 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 240 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 240 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 240 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 241 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 241 S Loara St 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 242 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 242 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 244 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 244 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 244 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 246 MANCHESTER 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 246 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 246 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 246 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 246 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 250 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 250 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 255 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 255 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 264 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 264 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 266 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 266 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 270 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 270 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 270 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 270 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 271 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 271 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 273 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 273 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 275 MANCHESTER N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 275 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 275 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 275 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 300 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 300 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 303 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 303 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 303 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 309 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 309 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 309 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 315 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 315 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 329 MANCHESTER AVE N 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 329 N MANCHESTER AVE 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1971, 1965, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 329 N MANCHESTER PL 2014, 2010, 2005, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1896 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1898 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1901 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Corona, California Quadrangle Created: 1902 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Garden Grove, California Quadrangle Created: 1935 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1942 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1949 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1950 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1965 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1972 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 1981 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX B: HISTORIC TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Project No. 17-177713.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 2012 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX C: REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT FORM-LBC-ASH ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 1600 West Lincoln 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92802 Inquiry Number: 4901213.2s April 07, 2017 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 268 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-11 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC4901213.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92802 COORDINATES 33.8316080 - 33˚ 49’ 53.78’’Latitude (North): 117.9377350 - 117˚ 56’ 15.84’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 413228.3UTM X (Meters): 3743686.8UTM Y (Meters): 133 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5641294 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140513Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 4901213.2s Page 2 E39 1646 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 447, 0.085, WNW G38 ORANGE CO SVC STA EQ 225 N LOARA SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST, RCRA NonGen /... Higher 428, 0.081, NNE G37 ORANGE CO SERVICE ST 225 N LOARA ST UST Higher 428, 0.081, NNE G36 225 N LOARA ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 428, 0.081, NNE G35 RUST LICK INC 303 N MANCHESTER AVE SEMS-ARCHIVE Higher 416, 0.079, North G34 RUST LICK INCORPORAT 303 MANCHESTER ENVIROSTOR, HIST CORTESE Higher 416, 0.079, North F33 LAHABRA PRODUCTS INC 1631 W LINCOLN AVE HIST UST Higher 388, 0.073, NNW F32 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE CA FID UST, EMI Higher 388, 0.073, NNW F31 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE. SEMS-ARCHIVE, UST Higher 388, 0.073, NNW F30 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 LINCOLN AVE. W. LUST Higher 388, 0.073, NNW F29 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE SWEEPS UST Higher 388, 0.073, NNW C28 CRYOGENIC COMPONENTS 1549 W EMBASSY STREE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 351, 0.066, East B27 JESSE GARCIA 275 N MANCHESTER AVE UST Higher 313, 0.059, NNE B26 GARCIA SITE 275 MANCHESTER LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 313, 0.059, NNE D25 LA HABRA PRODUCTS 240 S LOARA ST UST Higher 283, 0.054, SE C24 1552 W EMBASSY ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 276, 0.052, ESE C23 B K F INDUSTRIES INC 1559 W EMBASSY ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 269, 0.051, East E22 1640 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Lower 263, 0.050, WNW D21 QUICK START 235 S LOARA ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 237, 0.045, South B20 RON BROWNS AUTO CENT 1557 W LINCOLN AVE CA FID UST Higher 230, 0.044, NE B19 RON BROWNS AUTO CENT 1557 W LINCOLN AVE UST, SWEEPS UST Higher 230, 0.044, NE C18 JACK-X-CHANGE 1556 W EMBASSY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 221, 0.042, ESE B17 214 N LOARA ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 175, 0.033, NNE B16 ANAHEIM TOC ANH 205 NORTH LOARA AVE HIST UST Higher 139, 0.026, NNE B15 ANAHEIM TOC "ANH" 205 N LOARA ST HIST UST Higher 139, 0.026, NNE B14 1615 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 138, 0.026, North B13 1609 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 109, 0.021, NNE B12 1613 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 105, 0.020, NNE B11 A 1 AUTO RPR SERVICE 1613 W LINCOLN RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 105, 0.020, NNE A10 118 S LOARA ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 53, 0.010, ENE A9 MILLS FORD 1600 WEST LINCOLN AV RGA LUST TP A8 MILLS FORD 1600 W LINCOLN AVE HAZNET TP A7 MILLS FORD 1600 W LINCOLN AVE HIST UST TP A6 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE RGA LUST TP A5 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, RGA LUST TP A4 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE W RGA LUST TP A3 MILLS COLLISION CENT 1600 W LINCOLN AVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, AST, HIST UST, FINDS, EMI, HIST... TP A2 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN RGA LUST TP A1 MILLS FORD COMPANY 1600 W LINCOLN AVE UST TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92802 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 4901213.2s Page 3 M78 TARGET #2421 101 S EUCLID ST RCRA-LQG Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW M77 CVS PHARMACY #17478 101 S EUCLID ST STE RCRA-CESQG, ECHO Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW M76 MOBIL #18-GY7 101 S EUCLID ST LUST, HIST UST Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW M75 MOBIL #18-GY7 101 EUCLID ST LUST Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW N74 ANAHEIM CHEVROLET GE 215 S EUCLID RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 1041, 0.197, WSW N73 WOODY CHEVROLET INC 215 S EUCLID HIST UST Lower 1041, 0.197, WSW N72 WOODY CHEVROLET 215 S EUCLID ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, EMI Lower 1041, 0.197, WSW N71 BEACON BAY AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST UST Lower 1000, 0.189, WSW N70 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1000, 0.189, WSW N69 CARWASH OF AMERICA 216 LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 1000, 0.189, WSW N68 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST LUST, HIST UST Lower 1000, 0.189, WSW M67 PICOFARAD INC. 237-D N EUCLID RCRA-SQG Lower 970, 0.184, WNW N66 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 SOUTH EUCLID AVE HIST UST Lower 913, 0.173, WSW M65 ARMOUR OIL COMPANY 1680 W LINCOLN BLVD HIST UST Lower 875, 0.166, WNW M64 ARMOUR OIL COMPANY 1680 W LINCOLN AVE LUST, HIST UST Lower 875, 0.166, WNW 63 WISEMAN ENGINEERING 1555 W BROADWAY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 858, 0.162, SE L62 ECONO LUBE N TUNE #4 1512 W LINCOLN AVE # UST Higher 837, 0.159, East L61 JONES AUTO BODY & PA 1520 W LINCOLN AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 837, 0.159, East L60 ECONO LUBE N TUNE #4 1512 W LINCOLN AVE SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 837, 0.159, East K59 RAYCO AUTO CENTERS 1687 W LINCOLN RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 737, 0.140, WNW J58 HARBOR PALLET CO 1516 EMBASSY LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 659, 0.125, East J57 HARBOR PALLET COMPAN 1516 W EMBASSY ST LUST, Orange Co. Industrial Site Higher 659, 0.125, East J56 HARBOR PALLET COMPAN 1516 W EMBASSY ST UST Higher 659, 0.125, East J55 1522 W EMBASSY ST EDR Hist Auto Higher 640, 0.121, East H54 SHORE MARBLE 1541 W BROADWAY SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Higher 636, 0.120, SE H53 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST CA FID UST Higher 636, 0.120, SE H52 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST UST, SWEEPS UST Higher 636, 0.120, SE K51 AFTER 5 TUX SHOPS 1683 W LINCOLN RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 613, 0.116, WNW J50 KEMMER CORP 1526 W EMBASSY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 593, 0.112, East 49 1666 W PAMPAS LN EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 570, 0.108, WSW I48 PHILLIPS CO. 246 N MANCHESTER AVE HIST UST Higher 554, 0.105, NE I47 PHILLIPS CO 255 N MANCHESTER AVE UST Higher 513, 0.097, NE H46 GENERAL VAN AND STOR 1565 WEST MABLE HIST UST Higher 511, 0.097, SE H45 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST HIST UST Higher 511, 0.097, SE E44 1648 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 447, 0.085, WNW E43 J&G RADIATOR 1648 W LINCOLN RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 447, 0.085, WNW E42 1644 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 447, 0.085, WNW E41 1650 W LINCOLN AVE EDR Hist Auto Higher 447, 0.085, WNW E40 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 1644 W LINCOLN AVE UST, HIST UST Higher 447, 0.085, WNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92802 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 4901213.2s Page 4 S117 GALAXY OIL CO, MERCU 1406 W BROADWAY LUST, HIST UST, EMI Higher 1821, 0.345, ESE S116 HOME OIL COMPANY 1422 W. BROADWAY LUST, CHMIRS Higher 1786, 0.338, ESE S115 HOME OIL CO OF ANAHE 1422 W BROADWAY SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, LUST, HIST... Higher 1786, 0.338, ESE P114 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY 110 N MANCHESTER AVE LUST Higher 1376, 0.261, East P113 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY 110 MANCHESTER AVE LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1339, 0.254, East O112 EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIA 231-307 NORTH EUCLID ENVIROSTOR Lower 1299, 0.246, WNW 111 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY F 101 N MANCHESTER AVE LUST, Orange Co. Industrial Site, HIST CORTESE,... Higher 1267, 0.240, East O110 J&H DEBURRING, INC. 307 N. EUCLID WAY #H ENVIROSTOR Higher 1249, 0.237, NW O109 J AND H DEBURRING IN 307 N EUCLID WY BLDG Orange Co. Industrial Site, RCRA NonGen / NLR, EMI Higher 1249, 0.237, NW O108 BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 307 N. EUCLID WAY, F ENVIROSTOR Higher 1249, 0.237, NW O107 L C PRINGLE SALE INC 307 EUCLID WAY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 1249, 0.237, NW O106 ARCO #1795 301 EUCLID ST LUST Higher 1232, 0.233, NW R105 GARO MANUELIAN 301 S EUCLID ST HIST UST Lower 1229, 0.233, SW R104 ARCO # 1795 301 S EUCLID AVE LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST Lower 1229, 0.233, SW R103 SMOG PROS (ARCO #179 301 S EUCLID ST UST Lower 1229, 0.233, SW Q102 SYLVANIA LIGHTING SE 1521 W BROADWAY HIST UST Higher 1205, 0.228, SE Q101 SYLVANIA LIGHTING SE 1521 W BRODWAY HIST UST Higher 1205, 0.228, SE R100 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP. 1680 W BROADWAY RCRA-LQG, FINDS Lower 1200, 0.227, SW R99 MOBIL STATION (18-G0 1680 W BROADWAY SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1200, 0.227, SW R98 MOBIL- STATION- (18- 1680 W BROADWAY UST Lower 1200, 0.227, SW R97 DEAN P RICHTER 1680 W BROADWAY LUST, HIST UST Lower 1200, 0.227, SW R96 MOBIL #18-G06 1680 LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 1200, 0.227, SW O95 DAISY CLEANERS 277 EUCLID RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 1188, 0.225, NW O94 POWDERCOAT SERVICES 307 N. EUCLID WAY UN RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1181, 0.224, NW O93 BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 307 N EUCLUD WAT UNI RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 1181, 0.224, NW R92 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 260 S EUCLID ST LUST, HIST UST Lower 1179, 0.223, SW R91 EXXON #7-7727 260 S EUCLID ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1179, 0.223, SW R90 NOEL ENTERPRISES (EX 260 S EUCLID ST UST Lower 1179, 0.223, SW R89 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 260 EUCLID ST LUST Lower 1179, 0.223, SW Q88 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 W MABLE ST UST Higher 1178, 0.223, ESE Q87 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 MABLE STREET RCRA-SQG, RAATS, ICIS, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1178, 0.223, ESE Q86 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 MABLE ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 1178, 0.223, ESE O85 TOWER PARK INDUSTRIA 313-353 EUCLID WAY ENVIROSTOR Higher 1170, 0.222, NW O84 COAST COLOR 313 B N EUCLID WY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1170, 0.222, NW P83 JIFFY LUBE 1440 W LINCOLN AVE RCRA-SQG, UST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, FINDS,... Higher 1145, 0.217, East O82 EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIA 231 EUCLID ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 1126, 0.213, NW O81 PICOFARAD, INC. 237-D N. EUCLID ENVIROSTOR Higher 1102, 0.209, NW M80 TARGET STORE T2421 101 S EUCLID ST RCRA-SQG Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW M79 MOBIL STATION (18-GY 101 S EUCLID ST SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1042, 0.197, WNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92802 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 4901213.2s Page 5 144 ANAWOOD CLEANERS 1223 S EUCLID RCRA-SQG, ENVIROSTOR, Orange Co. Industrial Site,... Lower 5102, 0.966, SSW Y143 ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL 811 WEST LINCOLN AVE ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 4037, 0.765, East Y142 TAORMINA FAMILY / CI 903-925 W. LINCOLN A ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 3973, 0.752, East 141 ANAHEIM UNION HIGH S 501 CRESCENT WAY ENVIROSTOR, LUST, SCH, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST,... Lower 3317, 0.628, NW 140 KCA ELECTRONICS, INC 223 N. CRESCENT WAY ENVIROSTOR, SLIC, Orange Co. Industrial Site,... Lower 2831, 0.536, WNW 139 ANAHEIM PLAZA 556 EUCLID N. LUST Higher 2628, 0.498, NNW X138 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 1131 LINCOLN AVE LUST Higher 2627, 0.498, East X137 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 1131 W LINCOLN RCRA-SQG, LUST, HIST UST, FINDS, HAZNET, ECHO Higher 2627, 0.498, East 136 GOODYEAR TIRE 1200 BROADWAY LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2421, 0.459, ESE 135 J-TRON INC 512 E CENTRAL PK AVE SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, HAZNET,... Higher 2272, 0.430, SE W134 BUD’S DELIVERY SERVI 528 CENTRAL PARK AVE LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2207, 0.418, SE W133 LINCO INDUSTRIES, IN 528 S. CENTRAL PARK ENVIROSTOR, NPDES Higher 2205, 0.418, SE W132 YUKI TRUCKING 549 CENTRAL PARK LUST Higher 2191, 0.415, SE V131 ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS 333 EUCLID LUST Lower 2191, 0.415, NW W130 YUKI TRUCKING 549 CENTRAL PARK LUST, HIST UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2162, 0.409, SE V129 U.S. SPRINT 1750 W PENHALL WAY LUST Lower 2143, 0.406, WNW V128 U S SPRINT 1750 PENHALL WAY LUST, CA FID UST, HIST CORTESE Lower 2143, 0.406, WNW T127 AL ROHRS AND SONS 1436 SANTA ANA ST LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2098, 0.397, SE U126 DURAN COMPANY 1773 WEST LINCOLN AV ENVIROSTOR Lower 2038, 0.386, West U125 DURAN CO 1773 W LINCOLN AVE # SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 2038, 0.386, West U124 FIRST STATE BANK PRO 1771 LUST, HIST CORTESE Lower 2016, 0.382, West S123 ROSS PARK EXPANSION 318 HESSEL STREET US BROWNFIELDS Higher 1959, 0.371, ESE U122 ECONOMY RENTALS INC 1771 W LINCOLN AVE LUST, HIST UST Lower 1949, 0.369, WNW T121 AL ROHRS SON 1436 W SANTA ANA ST LUST, SLIC, EMI, NPDES Higher 1903, 0.360, SE T120 AL ROHRS AND SON, IN 1436 W. SANTA ANA ST LUST Higher 1903, 0.360, SE 119 FACILITY 8232-1 1747 LINCOLN BLDG. L HIST CORTESE Lower 1836, 0.348, WNW S118 GALAXY OIL 1406 BROADWAY LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST CORTESE Higher 1821, 0.345, ESE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92802 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site MILLS FORD COMPANY 1600 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92801 N/AUST Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 1923 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN ANAHEIM, CA N/ARGA LUST MILLS COLLISION CENT 1600 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92801 CAD981388002RCRA-SQG EPA ID:: CAD981388002 LUST Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901074 Global ID: T0605901074 AST HIST UST FINDS Registry ID:: 110002417037 EMI Facility Id: 1082 HIST CORTESE Reg Id: 083001421T ECHO MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE W ANAHEIM, CA N/ARGA LUST MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA N/ARGA LUST MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM, CA N/ARGA LUST MILLS FORD 1600 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92801 N/AHIST UST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Facility Id: 00000038575 MILLS FORD 1600 W LINCOLN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92801 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAD981388002 MILLS FORD 1600 WEST LINCOLN AV ANAHEIM, CA N/ARGA LUST DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE ICE HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/10/2016 has revealed that there are 5 SEMS-ARCHIVE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE. NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F31 38 RUST LICK INC 303 N MANCHESTER AVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.079 mi.) G35 43 HOME OIL CO OF ANAHE 1422 W BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.338 mi.) S115 168 J-TRON INC 512 E CENTRAL PK AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.430 mi.) 135 227 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DURAN CO 1773 W LINCOLN AVE # W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.386 mi.) U125 210 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TARGET #2421 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M78 93 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP. 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R100 135 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there are 19 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ A 1 AUTO RPR SERVICE 1613 W LINCOLN NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.) B11 20 JACK-X-CHANGE 1556 W EMBASSY ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.042 mi.) C18 25 B K F INDUSTRIES INC 1559 W EMBASSY ST E 0 - 1/8 (0.051 mi.) C23 29 CRYOGENIC COMPONENTS 1549 W EMBASSY STREE E 0 - 1/8 (0.066 mi.) C28 33 J&G RADIATOR 1648 W LINCOLN WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E43 50 KEMMER CORP 1526 W EMBASSY E 0 - 1/8 (0.112 mi.) J50 55 AFTER 5 TUX SHOPS 1683 W LINCOLN WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.116 mi.) K51 56 JONES AUTO BODY & PA 1520 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) L61 68 WISEMAN ENGINEERING 1555 W BROADWAY SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.162 mi.) 63 70 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIA 231 EUCLID ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.213 mi.) O82 103 JIFFY LUBE 1440 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.) P83 105 COAST COLOR 313 B N EUCLID WY NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) O84 109 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 MABLE STREET ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) Q87 113 BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 307 N EUCLUD WAT UNI NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.224 mi.) O93 123 DAISY CLEANERS 277 EUCLID NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.225 mi.) O95 126 L C PRINGLE SALE INC 307 EUCLID WAY NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) O107 146 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PICOFARAD INC. 237-D N EUCLID WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.184 mi.) M67 75 ANAHEIM CHEVROLET GE 215 S EUCLID WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) N74 84 TARGET STORE T2421 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M80 97 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CVS PHARMACY #17478 101 S EUCLID ST STE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M77 90 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/2016 has revealed that there are 14 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RUST LICK INCORPORAT 303 MANCHESTER N 0 - 1/8 (0.079 mi.) G34 42 Facility Id: 30280411 Status: Refer: Other Agency PICOFARAD, INC. 237-D N. EUCLID NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.209 mi.) O81 102 Facility Id: 71002494 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation TOWER PARK INDUSTRIA 313-353 EUCLID WAY NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) O85 111 Facility Id: 60000725 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency BURLINGTON ENGINEERI 307 N. EUCLID WAY, F NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) O108 149 Facility Id: 71002988 Status: No Action Required J&H DEBURRING, INC. 307 N. EUCLID WAY #H NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) O110 156 Facility Id: 71002799 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation HOME OIL CO OF ANAHE 1422 W BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.338 mi.) S115 168 Facility Id: 30510020 Status: Refer: Other Agency LINCO INDUSTRIES, IN 528 S. CENTRAL PARK SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.418 mi.) W133 222 Facility Id: 60002426 Status: Active TAORMINA FAMILY / CI 903-925 W. LINCOLN A E 1/2 - 1 (0.752 mi.) Y142 256 Facility Id: 60002105 Status: Inactive - Action Required ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL 811 WEST LINCOLN AVE E 1/2 - 1 (0.765 mi.) Y143 259 Facility Id: 30820020 Status: No Further Action PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIA 231-307 NORTH EUCLID WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) O112 162 Facility Id: 71003714 Status: Active DURAN COMPANY 1773 WEST LINCOLN AV W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.386 mi.) U126 211 Facility Id: 30270003 Status: Refer: Other Agency KCA ELECTRONICS, INC 223 N. CRESCENT WAY WNW 1/2 - 1 (0.536 mi.) 140 246 Facility Id: 71003492 Status: Refer: Local Agency ANAHEIM UNION HIGH S 501 CRESCENT WAY NW 1/2 - 1 (0.628 mi.) 141 250 Facility Id: 30820008 Status: No Further Action ANAWOOD CLEANERS 1223 S EUCLID SSW 1/2 - 1 (0.966 mi.) 144 263 Facility Id: 30720011 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 37 LUST sites within EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GARCIA SITE 275 MANCHESTER NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.) B26 31 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901245 Global ID: T0605901245 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 LINCOLN AVE. W. NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F30 35 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Leak being confirmed Global Id: T0605955516 Global ID: T0605955516 HARBOR PALLET COMPAN 1516 W EMBASSY ST E 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) J57 60 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901981 HARBOR PALLET CO 1516 EMBASSY E 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) J58 62 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901164 Global ID: T0605901164 Global ID: T0605901981 ARCO #1795 301 EUCLID ST NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) O106 145 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901686 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY F 101 N MANCHESTER AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) 111 157 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605901805 Global ID: T0605901805 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY 110 MANCHESTER AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.) P113 165 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901683 IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY 110 N MANCHESTER AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.261 mi.) P114 166 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901683 HOME OIL CO OF ANAHE 1422 W BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.338 mi.) S115 168 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Open - Remediation Global Id: T0605927641 HOME OIL COMPANY 1422 W. BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.338 mi.) S116 181 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global ID: T0605927641 GALAXY OIL CO, MERCU 1406 W BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) S117 183 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900129 GALAXY OIL 1406 BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) S118 189 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605900129 AL ROHRS AND SON, IN 1436 W. SANTA ANA ST SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.) T120 191 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway Global ID: T0605951040 AL ROHRS SON 1436 W SANTA ANA ST SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.) T121 192 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902245 AL ROHRS AND SONS 1436 SANTA ANA ST SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.397 mi.) T127 212 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605902245 YUKI TRUCKING 549 CENTRAL PARK SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.409 mi.) W130 217 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901267 YUKI TRUCKING 549 CENTRAL PARK SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.) W132 220 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901267 BUD’S DELIVERY SERVI 528 CENTRAL PARK AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.418 mi.) W134 225 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900382 Global ID: T0605900382 GOODYEAR TIRE 1200 BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.459 mi.) 136 232 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605900957 Global Id: T0605901318 Global ID: T0605901318 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 1131 W LINCOLN E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) X137 236 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900323 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 1131 LINCOLN AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) X138 241 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Global ID: T0605900323 ANAHEIM PLAZA 556 EUCLID N. NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) 139 242 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway Global Id: T0605907715 Global ID: T0605907715 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARMOUR OIL COMPANY 1680 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) M64 71 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900959 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N68 76 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902329 CARWASH OF AMERICA 216 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N69 79 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605902329 MOBIL #18-GY7 101 EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M75 86 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Remediation Plan Global ID: T0605902046 MOBIL #18-GY7 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M76 87 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902046 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 260 EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R89 117 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605901402 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 260 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R92 120 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901402 MOBIL #18-G06 1680 SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R96 128 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway Global ID: T0605900625 DEAN P RICHTER 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R97 129 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900625 ARCO # 1795 301 S EUCLID AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R104 138 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 Global Id: T0605901686 ECONOMY RENTALS INC 1771 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.369 mi.) U122 198 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605902332 FIRST STATE BANK PRO 1771 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) U124 207 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0605900429 Global ID: T0605902332 U S SPRINT 1750 PENHALL WAY WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.) V128 213 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Pollution Characterization Global ID: T0605900348 U.S. SPRINT 1750 W PENHALL WAY WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.) V129 215 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605900348 ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS 333 EUCLID NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.415 mi.) V131 218 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605968412 Global ID: T0605968412 SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ AL ROHRS SON 1436 W SANTA ANA ST SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.360 mi.) T121 192 Database: SLIC, Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605951040 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 16 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RON BROWNS AUTO CENT 1557 W LINCOLN AVE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B19 26 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 1951 LA HABRA PRODUCTS 240 S LOARA ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.054 mi.) D25 30 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 10065 JESSE GARCIA 275 N MANCHESTER AVE NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.) B27 33 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 11406 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE. NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F31 38 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 6805 ORANGE CO SERVICE ST 225 N LOARA ST NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G37 44 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 4467 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 1644 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E40 48 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 3531 PHILLIPS CO 255 N MANCHESTER AVE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) I47 54 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 4469 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.120 mi.) H52 58 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 7443 HARBOR PALLET COMPAN 1516 W EMBASSY ST E 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) J56 60 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 1750 ECONO LUBE N TUNE #4 1512 W LINCOLN AVE # E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) L62 70 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 3646 JIFFY LUBE 1440 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.) P83 105 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 10786 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 W MABLE ST ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) Q88 117 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 2990 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BEACON BAY AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N71 82 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 4494 NOEL ENTERPRISES (EX 260 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R90 118 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 5078 MOBIL- STATION- (18- 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R98 133 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Facility Id: 1274 SMOG PROS (ARCO #179 301 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R103 138 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Facility Id: 4474 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: The EPA’s listing of Brownfields properties from the Cleanups in My Community program, which provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. A review of the US BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/19/2016 has revealed that there is 1 US BROWNFIELDS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ROSS PARK EXPANSION 318 HESSEL STREET ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.371 mi.) S123 200 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 15 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RON BROWNS AUTO CENT 1557 W LINCOLN AVE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B19 26 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 1951 LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F29 35 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 4509 ORANGE CO SVC STA EQ 225 N LOARA NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G38 45 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 4467 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.120 mi.) H52 58 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 7443 SHORE MARBLE 1541 W BROADWAY SE 0 - 1/8 (0.120 mi.) H54 59 Comp Number: 1230 ECONO LUBE N TUNE #4 1512 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) L60 67 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 3646 JIFFY LUBE 1440 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.) P83 105 Status: A Comp Number: 10786 WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 MABLE ST ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) Q86 112 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 2990 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ QUICK START 235 S LOARA ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.045 mi.) D21 27 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 10581 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N70 80 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 4494 WOODY CHEVROLET 215 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) N72 82 Comp Number: 3467 MOBIL STATION (18-GY 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M79 95 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 2398 EXXON #7-7727 260 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R91 118 Comp Number: 5078 MOBIL STATION (18-G0 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R99 133 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 3555 ARCO # 1795 301 S EUCLID AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R104 138 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 4474 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 21 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM TOC "ANH" 205 N LOARA ST NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.026 mi.) B15 24 Facility Id: 00000059608 ANAHEIM TOC ANH 205 NORTH LOARA AVE NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.026 mi.) B16 24 LAHABRA PRODUCTS INC 1631 W LINCOLN AVE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F33 41 Facility Id: 00000013181 ORANGE CO SVC STA EQ 225 N LOARA NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G38 45 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 21 Facility Id: 00000052408 AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 1644 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E40 48 Facility Id: 00000056604 GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) H45 52 Facility Id: 00000067528 GENERAL VAN AND STOR 1565 WEST MABLE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.097 mi.) H46 53 PHILLIPS CO. 246 N MANCHESTER AVE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) I48 54 Facility Id: 00000005974 SHORE MARBLE 1541 W BROADWAY SE 0 - 1/8 (0.120 mi.) H54 59 Facility Id: 00000053137 SYLVANIA LIGHTING SE 1521 W BRODWAY SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) Q101 136 SYLVANIA LIGHTING SE 1521 W BROADWAY SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) Q102 137 Facility Id: 00000002080 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARMOUR OIL COMPANY 1680 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) M64 71 Facility Id: 00000008758 ARMOUR OIL COMPANY 1680 W LINCOLN BLVD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) M65 74 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 SOUTH EUCLID AVE WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) N66 74 ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N68 76 Facility Id: 00000043008 WOODY CHEVROLET INC 215 S EUCLID WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) N73 84 Facility Id: 00000064285 MOBIL #18-GY7 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M76 87 Facility Id: 00000039294 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 260 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R92 120 Facility Id: 00000024013 DEAN P RICHTER 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R97 129 Facility Id: 00000039157 ARCO # 1795 301 S EUCLID AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R104 138 GARO MANUELIAN 301 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R105 143 Facility Id: 00000026630 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 14 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RON BROWNS AUTO CENT 1557 W LINCOLN AVE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B20 27 Facility Id: 30003900 Status: A LA HABRA STUCCO 1631 W LINCOLN AVE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.073 mi.) F32 39 Facility Id: 30017724 Status: A ORANGE CO SVC STA EQ 225 N LOARA NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G38 45 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 22 Facility Id: 30008656 Status: A GENERAL VAN & STORAG 1565 W MABLE ST SE 0 - 1/8 (0.120 mi.) H53 59 Facility Id: 30007941 Status: A ECONO LUBE N TUNE #4 1512 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.159 mi.) L60 67 Facility Id: 30011612 Status: A JIFFY LUBE 1440 W LINCOLN AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.217 mi.) P83 105 Facility Id: 30009994 Status: A WILSON & HAMPTON PAI 1524 MABLE ST ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) Q86 112 Facility Id: 30003487 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ QUICK START 235 S LOARA ST S 0 - 1/8 (0.045 mi.) D21 27 Facility Id: 30013431 Status: A ANAHEIM AUTO WASH 216 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N70 80 Facility Id: 30017723 Status: A WOODY CHEVROLET 215 S EUCLID ST WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) N72 82 Facility Id: 30007331 Status: I MOBIL STATION (18-GY 101 S EUCLID ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.197 mi.) M79 95 Facility Id: 30001753 Status: A EXXON #7-7727 260 S EUCLID ST SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) R91 118 Facility Id: 30001173 Status: A MOBIL STATION (18-G0 1680 W BROADWAY SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R99 133 Facility Id: 30000757 Status: A ARCO # 1795 301 S EUCLID AVE SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.233 mi.) R104 138 Facility Id: 30004349 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 23 there are 4 RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE CO SVC STA EQ 225 N LOARA NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G38 45 RAYCO AUTO CENTERS 1687 W LINCOLN WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.140 mi.) K59 65 POWDERCOAT SERVICES 307 N. EUCLID WAY UN NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.224 mi.) O94 124 J AND H DEBURRING IN 307 N EUCLID WY BLDG NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.237 mi.) O109 150 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 15 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GARCIA SITE 275 MANCHESTER NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.059 mi.) B26 31 Reg Id: 083001637T RUST LICK INCORPORAT 303 MANCHESTER N 0 - 1/8 (0.079 mi.) G34 42 Reg Id: 30280411 HARBOR PALLET CO 1516 EMBASSY E 0 - 1/8 (0.125 mi.) J58 62 Reg Id: 083001524T Reg Id: 083002891T IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY F 101 N MANCHESTER AVE E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.240 mi.) 111 157 Reg Id: 083002574T IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY 110 MANCHESTER AVE E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.) P113 165 Reg Id: 083002309T GALAXY OIL 1406 BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.345 mi.) S118 189 Reg Id: 083000169T AL ROHRS AND SONS 1436 SANTA ANA ST SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.397 mi.) T127 212 Reg Id: 083003368T YUKI TRUCKING 549 CENTRAL PARK SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.409 mi.) W130 217 Reg Id: 083001681T BUD’S DELIVERY SERVI 528 CENTRAL PARK AVE SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.418 mi.) W134 225 Reg Id: 083000476T GOODYEAR TIRE 1200 BROADWAY ESE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.459 mi.) 136 232 Reg Id: 083001752T PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CARWASH OF AMERICA 216 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.189 mi.) N69 79 Reg Id: 083003567T MOBIL #18-G06 1680 SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.227 mi.) R96 128 Reg Id: 083000787T Reg Id: 083003182T FACILITY 8232-1 1747 LINCOLN BLDG. L WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.348 mi.) 119 191 Reg Id: 2621 FIRST STATE BANK PRO 1771 W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) U124 207 Reg Id: 083000537T EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 24 Reg Id: 083003570T U S SPRINT 1750 PENHALL WAY WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.406 mi.) V128 213 Reg Id: 083000435T EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 13 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 118 S LOARA ST ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.010 mi.) A10 20 Not reported 1613 W LINCOLN AVE NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.) B12 22 Not reported 1609 W LINCOLN AVE NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.021 mi.) B13 23 Not reported 1615 W LINCOLN AVE N 0 - 1/8 (0.026 mi.) B14 23 Not reported 214 N LOARA ST NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.033 mi.) B17 25 Not reported 1552 W EMBASSY ST ESE 0 - 1/8 (0.052 mi.) C24 30 Not reported 225 N LOARA ST NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.081 mi.) G36 44 Not reported 1646 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E39 48 Not reported 1650 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E41 49 Not reported 1644 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E42 50 Not reported 1648 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) E44 52 Not reported 1522 W EMBASSY ST E 0 - 1/8 (0.121 mi.) J55 60 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 1640 W LINCOLN AVE WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.050 mi.) E22 28 EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 25 Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 1666 W PAMPAS LN WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.108 mi.) 49 54 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4901213.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 26 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ METROPOLITAN RESIDENTIAL (PARCEL B ENVIROSTOR, VCP EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV Natural Gas 160 1 120 1 2 0 1 2 0 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 5 NR NR 3 0 2 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 2 NR NR NR 2 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 20 NR NR NR 12 7 0.250 1RCRA-SQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 14 NR 5 3 5 1 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 38 NR NR 21 12 4 0.500 1LUST TC4901213.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 17 NR NR NR 7 9 0.250 1UST 1 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250 1AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 15 NR NR NR 9 6 0.250SWEEPS UST 23 NR NR NR 12 9 0.250 2HIST UST 14 NR NR NR 9 5 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS TC4901213.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPOrange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 4 NR NR NR 3 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1EMI 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICE 16 NR NR 9 3 3 0.500 1HIST CORTESE TC4901213.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1ECHO EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 13 NR NR NR NR 13 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 5 NR NR NR NR NR TP 5RGA LUST 195 0 5 38 75 61 16- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4901213.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.9361704Longitude: 33.8334281Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 1923Facility ID: UST: Site 1 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92801 Target 1600 W LINCOLN AVE N/A A1 USTMILLS FORD COMPANY U003779606 2005 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2006 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2007 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2008 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2009 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2010 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2011 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN 2012 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN RGA LUST: Site 2 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target 1600 LINCOLN N/A A2 RGA LUSTMILLS FORD S114651487 hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: MILLSFORD@AOL.COMContact email: 714-776-1330Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1600 W LINCOLN AVEContact address: RON MILLSContact: CAD981388002EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1600 W LINCOLN AVEFacility address: MILLS COLLISION CENTERFacility name: 04/18/2011Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: ECHO HIST CORTESE EMI FINDSSite 3 of 10 in cluster A HIST UST Actual: 133 ft. Property ASTANAHEIM, CA 92801 Target LUST1600 W LINCOLN AVE CAD981388002 A3 RCRA-SQGMILLS COLLISION CENTER 1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 221. Waste name: 221. Waste code: 135. Waste name: 135. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/01/1964Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: RON MILLSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/01/1964Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: 213-489-4656Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: LOS ANGELES, CA 90004 116 S MCCADDEN PLOwner/operator address: MICHAEL WALLACEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued) 1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/20/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901074Global Id: 12/05/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901074Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901074Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901074Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT031LOC Case Number: 083001421TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 06/20/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.938368Longitude: 33.832097Latitude: T0605901074Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: MILLS FORDSite name: 09/26/1995Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued) 1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9382992Longitude: 33.8324943Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 6/20/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/5/1989Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901074Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT031Local Case Num: 083001421TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/05/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901074Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 12/05/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901074Global Id: Regulatory Activities: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued)1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EB2A.pdfURL: 0002EB2AFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedEPAID: Not reportedProperty Owner Country: Not reportedProperty Owner Zip Code: Not reportedProperty Owner Stat : Not reportedProperty Owner City: Not reportedProperty Owner Mailing Address: Not reportedProperty Owner Phone: Not reportedProperty Owner Name: Not reportedOwner Country: Not reportedOwner Zip Code: Not reportedOwner State: Not reportedOwner Mail Address: Not reportedOwner Phone: Not reportedOperator Phone: Not reportedOperator Name: Not reportedMailing Address Zip Code: Not reportedMailing Address State: Not reportedMailing Address City: Not reportedMailing Address: Not reportedFax: Not reportedPhone: Not reportedBusiness Name: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedCERSID: 2,110Total Gallons: MILLS FORDOwner: AnaheimCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued)1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 3Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System 110002417037Registry ID: FINDS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued) 1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1.7913754496Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.851997566240376389Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2008Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 3Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued)1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002417037DFR URL: 110002417037Registry ID: 1000139855Envid: ECHO: 083001421TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 7.14e-007Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 7.14e-007Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 7.9e-008SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1e-005NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 3.33e-006Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.011390666Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.011488338257Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2013Year: 0.00072Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.00072Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 7e-005SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.01249NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.00336Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.005892Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.0068642875064Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 1082Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2012Year: .001473696Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .001473696Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .000163089024SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .02NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .006877248Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: MILLS COLLISION CENTER (Continued) 1000139855 TC4901213.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2003 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE W RGA LUST: Site 4 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target 1600 LINCOLN AVE W N/A A4 RGA LUSTMILLS FORD S114651484 1993 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST 1994 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST 1995 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST 1996 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST 1997 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST 1998 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST RGA LUST: Site 5 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target 1600 LINCOLN AVENUE, WEST N/A A5 RGA LUSTMILLS FORD S114651486 2001 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE 2002 MILLS FORD 1600 LINCOLN AVE RGA LUST: Site 6 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target 1600 LINCOLN AVE N/A A6 RGA LUSTMILLS FORD S114651485 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: #1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0009Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92801Owner City,St,Zip: 1600 W. LINCOLN AVEOwner Address: MCCOY MOTOR CO.Owner Name: 7147761330Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: AUTOMOBILE AGENCYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000038575Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Site 7 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92801 Target 1600 W LINCOLN AVE N/A A7 HIST USTMILLS FORD 1000291890 TC4901213.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 7Container Num: 007Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 6Container Num: 006Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 5Container Num: 005Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: #3Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: #2Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: MILLS FORD (Continued)1000291890 TC4901213.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 9Container Num: 009Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 8Container Num: 008Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: MILLS FORD (Continued)1000291890 Los AngelesTSD County: CAD981696420TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015501Mailing City,St,Zip: 1600 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147761330Telephone: RON MILLS, PRES.Contact: CAD981388002GEPAID: 2014Year: S113004474envid: OrangeFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Aqueous solution with total organic residues 10 percent or moreCat Decode: 0.2502Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues 10 percent or moreWaste Category: Los AngelesTSD County: CAD981696420TSD EPA ID: OrangeGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015501Mailing City,St,Zip: 1600 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147761330Telephone: RON MILLSContact: CAD981388002GEPAID: 2015Year: S113004474envid: HAZNET: Site 8 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92801 Target 1600 W LINCOLN AVE N/A A8 HAZNETMILLS FORD S113004474 TC4901213.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTSD County: CAD981696420TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015501Mailing City,St,Zip: 1600 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147761330Telephone: RON MILLS, PRES.Contact: CAD981388002GEPAID: 2011Year: S113004474envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.204Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD982444481TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015501Mailing City,St,Zip: 1600 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147761330Telephone: RON MILLS, PRES.Contact: CAD981388002GEPAID: 2011Year: S113004474envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.204Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD982444481TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015501Mailing City,St,Zip: 1600 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147761330Telephone: RON MILLS, PRES.Contact: CAD981388002GEPAID: 2011Year: S113004474envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.1251Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues 10 percent or moreWaste Category: MILLS FORD (Continued)S113004474 TC4901213.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 65 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.1Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: MILLS FORD (Continued)S113004474 1992 MILLS FORD 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE RGA LUST: Site 9 of 10 in cluster A Actual: 133 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA Target 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE N/A A9 RGA LUSTMILLS FORD S114651489 118 S LOARA STAddress: 2010Year: ARGO MOTOR SPORTSName: 118 S LOARA STAddress: 2009Year: ARGO MOTORSPORTName: 118 S LOARA STAddress: 2008Year: ARGO MOTORSPORTName: 118 S LOARA STAddress: 2006Year: ARGO MOTORSPORTName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 53 ft. Site 10 of 10 in cluster A 0.010 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 ENE 118 S LOARA ST N/A A10 EDR Hist Auto 1015174182 CAD983597154EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1613 W LINCOLNFacility address: A 1 AUTO RPR SERVICEFacility name: 07/30/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 105 ft. Site 1 of 11 in cluster B 0.020 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE FINDS1613 W LINCOLN CAD983597154 B11 RCRA-SQGA 1 AUTO RPR SERVICE 1000595761 TC4901213.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: BOB WONGOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 491-3821Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1613 W LINCOLNContact address: NAM HOANGContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 W LINCOLNMailing address: A 1 AUTO RPR SERVICE (Continued) 1000595761 TC4901213.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002854625DFR URL: 110002854625Registry ID: 1000595761Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002854625Registry ID: STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System 110057056484Registry ID: FINDS: A 1 AUTO RPR SERVICE (Continued) 1000595761 1613 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2012Year: DAVIDS AUTO REPAIRName: 1613 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2011Year: DAVIDS AUTO REPAIRName: 1613 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2009Year: DAVIDS AUTO REPAIRName: 1613 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2008Year: DAVIDS AUTO REPAIRName: 1613 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2005Year: LOS PRIMOS AUTO SERVICEName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 105 ft. Site 2 of 11 in cluster B 0.020 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 1613 W LINCOLN AVE N/A B12 EDR Hist Auto 1015255389 TC4901213.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2012Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2011Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2010Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2009Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2008Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2007Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2006Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2004Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2003Year: J & V AUTO REPAIRName: 1609 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2001Year: DISCOUNT AUTO REPAIRName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 109 ft. Site 3 of 11 in cluster B 0.021 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 1609 W LINCOLN AVE N/A B13 EDR Hist Auto 1015254450 1615 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2002Year: ACTION MUFFLERName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 138 ft. Site 4 of 11 in cluster B 0.026 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 North 1615 W LINCOLN AVE N/A B14 EDR Hist Auto 1015255712 TC4901213.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock Inventor, Vapor Sniff WellLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1984Year Installed: ONEContainer Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: BURLINGAME, CA 94010Owner City,St,Zip: ONE ADRIAN COURTOwner Address: GTE SPRINTOwner Name: 7149562620Telephone: TED CHRISTENSENContact Name: TELECOMMUNICATIONSOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000059608Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 139 ft. Site 5 of 11 in cluster B 0.026 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 205 N LOARA ST N/A B15 HIST USTANAHEIM TOC "ANH"U001578534 Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E9A4.pdfURL: 0002E9A4File Number: HIST UST: 139 ft. Site 6 of 11 in cluster B 0.026 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 205 NORTH LOARA AVE N/A B16 HIST USTANAHEIM TOC ANH S118407462 TC4901213.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: ANAHEIM TOC ANH (Continued)S118407462 214 N LOARA STAddress: 2001Year: BANGLA MOTOR REPAIRName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 175 ft. Site 7 of 11 in cluster B 0.033 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 214 N LOARA ST N/A B17 EDR Hist Auto 1015326170 Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 W EMBASSYMailing address: CAD980888770EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1556 W EMBASSYFacility address: JACK-X-CHANGEFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 221 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C 0.042 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE FINDS1556 W EMBASSY CAD980888770 C18 RCRA-SQGJACK-X-CHANGE 1000267673 TC4901213.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002675267DFR URL: 110002675267Registry ID: 1000267673Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002675267Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: JACK-X-CHANGE (Continued)1000267673 ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.93636Longitude: 33.83267Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 1951Facility ID: UST: 230 ft. Site 8 of 11 in cluster B 0.044 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NE SWEEPS UST1557 W LINCOLN AVE N/A B19 USTRON BROWNS AUTO CENTER U003779637 TC4901213.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: JET FUELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001951-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 428Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 03-18-92Action Date: 03-18-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1951Comp Number: RON BROWNS AUTO CENTER (Continued) U003779637 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1557 W LINCOLNMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147748861Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30003900Facility ID: CA FID UST: 230 ft. Site 9 of 11 in cluster B 0.044 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NE 1557 W LINCOLN AVE N/A B20 CA FID USTRON BROWNS AUTO CENTER S101589220 1Owner Tank Id: 07-14-92Created Date: 07-14-92Action Date: 07-14-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 10581Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 237 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D 0.045 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 131 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 South CA FID UST235 S LOARA ST N/A D21 SWEEPS USTQUICK START S101589460 TC4901213.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 235 S LOARA STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7145351127Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30013431Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 07-14-92Active Date: 280Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-010581-000001SWRCB Tank Id: QUICK START (Continued)S101589460 1640 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2012Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1640 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2011Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1640 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2010Year: REYES AUTO SVCName: 1640 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2009Year: RAYES AUTO SERVICEName: 1640 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2005Year: REYES AUTO SERVICEName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 263 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster E 0.050 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 132 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1640 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E22 EDR Hist Auto 1015259344 TC4901213.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: B K F INDUSTRIES INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 956-2161Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1559 W EMBASSY STContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD982436842EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1559 W EMBASSY STFacility address: B K F INDUSTRIES INCFacility name: 11/29/1990Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 269 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C 0.051 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 East FINDS1559 W EMBASSY ST CAD982436842 C23 RCRA-SQGB K F INDUSTRIES INC 1000472973 TC4901213.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002811896DFR URL: 110002811896Registry ID: 1000472973Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002811896Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: B K F INDUSTRIES INC (Continued)1000472973 1552 W EMBASSY STAddress: 2003Year: TURRETS BRAKES & SHEARS INCName: 1552 W EMBASSY STAddress: 2002Year: TURRETS BRAKES & SHEARS INCName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 276 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C 0.052 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE 1552 W EMBASSY ST N/A C24 EDR Hist Auto 1015247004 -117.935294Longitude: 33.831515Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 10065Facility ID: UST: 283 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D 0.054 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 240 S LOARA ST N/A D25 USTLA HABRA PRODUCTS U003778668 TC4901213.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 06/22/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901245Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/27/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901245Global Id: 06/22/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901245Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901245Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901245Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT188LOC Case Number: 083001637TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/27/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9363592Longitude: 33.8334453Latitude: T0605901245Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 313 ft. Site 10 of 11 in cluster B 0.059 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE HIST CORTESE275 MANCHESTER N/A B26 LUSTGARCIA SITE S103248986 TC4901213.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9363592Longitude: 33.8334453Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/27/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 6/22/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901245Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT188Local Case Num: 083001637TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak DiscoveryAction: 06/22/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901245Global Id: GARCIA SITE (Continued)S103248986 TC4901213.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001637TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: GARCIA SITE (Continued)S103248986 -117.935631Longitude: 33.8347069Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 11406Facility ID: UST: 313 ft. Site 11 of 11 in cluster B 0.059 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 275 N MANCHESTER AVE N/A B27 USTJESSE GARCIA U003778855 HAROLD RICHOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 772-8420Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1549 W EMBASSY STREETContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 W EMBASSY STREETMailing address: CAD017350166EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1549 W EMBASSY STREETFacility address: CRYOGENIC COMPONENTS INCFacility name: 09/09/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 351 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C 0.066 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 East FINDS1549 W EMBASSY STREET CAD017350166 C28 RCRA-SQGCRYOGENIC COMPONENTS INC 1000332494 TC4901213.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002638496DFR URL: 110002638496Registry ID: 1000332494Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002638496Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: CRYOGENIC COMPONENTS INC (Continued) 1000332494 TC4901213.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: GASHOLContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004509-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 61Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4509Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 388 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster F 0.073 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNW 1631 W LINCOLN AVE N/A F29 SWEEPS USTLA HABRA STUCCO U003984160 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605955516Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083004014TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 09/15/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.939066Longitude: 33.833508Latitude: T0605955516Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 388 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster F 0.073 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92803 NNW 1631 LINCOLN AVE. W. N/A F30 LUSTLA HABRA STUCCO S106784754 TC4901213.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605955516Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 09/15/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605955516Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 02/02/2005Date: OtherAction Type: T0605955516Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/21/2004Date: OtherAction Type: T0605955516Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 09/15/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 08/01/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 07/25/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 07/22/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 05/02/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 04/07/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605955516Global Id: 12/21/2004Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605955516Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605955516Global Id: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)S106784754 TC4901213.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: RMStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/21/2004Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605955516Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: LOCFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: LOARACross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083004014TCase Number: Leak being confirmedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Not reportedAction: 12/21/2004Date: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)S106784754 TC4901213.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)S106784754 06/12/03Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/02/00Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRE-CERCLIS SCREENINGAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/02/00Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Vermiculite InvestigationDescription: Program Priority: ANAHEIM, CA 1631 W LINCOLN AVE.Alias Address: LA HABRA PRODUCTS, INCAlias Name: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): 13004003.00000Person ID: 13301572.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13295714.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13290119.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0905632Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAN000905632EPA ID: 905632Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: 388 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster F 0.073 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNW UST1631 W LINCOLN AVE.CAN000905632 F31 SEMS-ARCHIVELA HABRA STUCCO 1003073262 TC4901213.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.937819Longitude: 33.834501Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 6805Facility ID: UST: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 11/27/02Date Completed: 10/01/01Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)1003073262 1990Year: 3Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 5Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3275SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 240 S LOARAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147741186Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30017724Facility ID: CA FID UST: 388 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster F 0.073 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNW EMI1631 W LINCOLN AVE N/A F32 CA FID USTLA HABRA STUCCO S101589602 TC4901213.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3299SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: 3Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 4Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3299SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: 3Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 4Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3299SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3241SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)S101589602 TC4901213.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .028704Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .0312Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3299SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 18087Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2005Year: 3.42Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 3.72Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.00133Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: LA HABRA STUCCO (Continued)S101589602 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1964Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92803Owner City,St,Zip: 240 S. LOARAOwner Address: LAHABRA PRODUCTS, INC.Owner Name: 7147741186Telephone: ED FITCHContact Name: BUILDING MATERIALSOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000013181Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EAB5.pdfURL: 0002EAB5File Number: HIST UST: 388 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster F 0.073 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92803 NNW 1631 W LINCOLN AVE N/A F33 HIST USTLAHABRA PRODUCTS INC U001578643 TC4901213.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1964Year Installed: LAHABRA PRODUCTS INC (Continued) U001578643 RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO THE ENVIRONMENT. ALSO THERE IS NO INFO 11/24/94 ADDENDUM TO PA INDICATES THE SITE HAS HAD NO RECORD OF AComments: 04/25/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280411Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FMC NIAGRA CHEMICAL DIVISIONAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: COMMERCIAL LIGHTING SERVICESAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM SPRAY CHEMICAL CO.Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: * Pesticides - Wastes From Production * CONTAMINATED SOILPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9376Longitude: 33.83343Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/25/1995Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30280411Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 416 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster G 0.079 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 North HIST CORTESE303 MANCHESTER N/A G34 ENVIROSTORRUST LICK INCORPORATED S105022505 TC4901213.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30280411Reg Id: CALSIReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM TELEPHONE DIRECTORY.Comments: 08/15/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DHS REGIONAL FILES SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDEDComments: 06/05/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ADDRESSED FACILITY; DATA GAPS CONCERNING WST GENERATION &/OR HANDLING TO BE PRELIM ASSESS DONE SI TO ASCERTAIN IF HAZ SOIL CONTMN EXIST ATComments: 02/28/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: THEREFORE DTSC RECOMMENDS NO FURTHER ACTION. TO INDICATE PCB’S WERE USED, STORED, OR DISPOSED OF AT THIS FACILITY. RUST LICK INCORPORATED (Continued) S105022505 NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0900457Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD049897879EPA ID: 900457Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: 416 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster G 0.079 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 North 303 N MANCHESTER AVE CAD049897879 G35 SEMS-ARCHIVERUST LICK INC 1003878044 TC4901213.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 03/15/89Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 03/15/89Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13297777.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13291919.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13286324.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: RUST LICK INC (Continued)1003878044 225 N LOARA STAddress: 2002Year: ORANGE COUNTY SERVICE STATIONName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 428 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster G 0.081 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 225 N LOARA ST N/A G36 EDR Hist Auto 1015339909 -117.9359353Longitude: 33.8348119Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 4467Facility ID: UST: 428 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster G 0.081 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE 225 N LOARA ST N/A G37 USTORANGE CO SERVICE STATION U003713555 TC4901213.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92801Owner City,St,Zip: 225 N. LOARA ST.Owner Address: LARRY P. HENRYOwner Name: 7147760300Telephone: LARRY P. HENRYContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000052408Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EABD.pdfURL: 0002EABDFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004467-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 4467Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 8000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004467-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 2Number: 4467Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: ECHO FINDS 428 ft.RAATSSite 5 of 5 in cluster G 0.081 mi.RCRA NonGen / NLR Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNE HIST UST225 N LOARA CAD064454804 G38 SWEEPS USTORANGE CO SVC STA EQUIP 1000315107 TC4901213.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 776-0300Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 225 N LOARAContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 N LOARAMailing address: CAD064454804EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 225 N LOARAFacility address: ORANGE CO SVC STA EQUIPFacility name: 04/29/1981Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 225 N LOARA STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147760300Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30008656Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1978Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1978Year Installed: ORANGE CO SVC STA EQUIP (Continued) 1000315107 TC4901213.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110002653995Registry ID: 1000315107Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002653995Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: YesTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: LARRY P HENRYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: ORANGE CO SVC STA EQUIP (Continued) 1000315107 TC4901213.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002653995DFR URL: ORANGE CO SVC STA EQUIP (Continued) 1000315107 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2010Year: FAST & EASY AUTO BODY & PAINTName: 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2008Year: EASY AUTO PAINT & BODY INCName: 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2007Year: EASY AUTO PAINT & BODY INCName: 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2006Year: EASY AUTO PAINT & BODY INCName: 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2005Year: EASY AUTO PAINT & BODY INCName: 1646 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2003Year: EASY AUTO PAINT & BODYName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 447 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1646 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E39 EDR Hist Auto 1015259867 1644 W. LINCOLN AVEOwner Address: PONTIUS CORP.Owner Name: 7146350860Telephone: JAMES PONTIUSContact Name: TRANSMISSION REPAIROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056604Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002ECE4.pdfURL: 0002ECE4File Number: HIST UST: -117.9375716Longitude: 33.8337752Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 3531Facility ID: UST: 447 ft. Site 3 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW HIST UST1644 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E40 USTAAMCO TRANSMISSIONS 1000178117 TC4901213.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 003Tank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92801Owner City,St,Zip: AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS (Continued) 1000178117 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2006Year: ALT AUTO REPAIRName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2005Year: JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERYName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2004Year: C & J AUTO REPAIR & TWNG SRVCName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2003Year: C & J AUTO REPAIR & TOWING SERName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2002Year: C & J AUTO REPAIR & TWNG SRVCName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 447 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1650 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E41 EDR Hist Auto 1015260572 TC4901213.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2012Year: JACOBOS AUTO UPHOLSTERYName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2011Year: JACOBOS AUTO UPHOLSTERYName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2010Year: PALAZIOS AUTO SVCName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2009Year: JACOBS AUTO UPHOLSTERYName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2008Year: ARC AUTO REPAIRName: 1650 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2007Year: ALT AUTO REPAIRName: (Continued)1015260572 1644 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2003Year: B & G AUTO REPAIRName: 1644 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2002Year: B & G AUTO REPAIRName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 447 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1644 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E42 EDR Hist Auto 1015259698 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1648 W LINCOLNContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 W LINCOLNMailing address: CAD982350068EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1648 W LINCOLNFacility address: J&G RADIATORFacility name: 07/23/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 447 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS1648 W LINCOLN CAD982350068 E43 RCRA-SQGJ&G RADIATOR 1000129386 TC4901213.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002799384Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: GARY COFFMANOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 778-3070Contact telephone: USContact country: J&G RADIATOR (Continued)1000129386 TC4901213.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002799384DFR URL: 110002799384Registry ID: 1000129386Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of J&G RADIATOR (Continued)1000129386 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2008Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2007Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2006Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2005Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2004Year: T AUTO REPAIRName: 1648 W LINCOLN AVEAddress: 2001Year: PERCYS AUTOName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 447 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster E 0.085 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1648 W LINCOLN AVE N/A E44 EDR Hist Auto 1015260007 Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000067528Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 511 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster H 0.097 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 1565 W MABLE ST N/A H45 HIST USTGENERAL VAN & STORAGE U001578605 TC4901213.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: XContainer Construction Thickness: 2Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: #1AContainer Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92802Owner City,St,Zip: 1565 W. MABLEOwner Address: GENERAL VAN & STORAGE CO., INCOwner Name: 7147743646Telephone: MIKE EVANSContact Name: GENERAL VAN & STORAGE (Continued) U001578605 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E961.pdfURL: 0002E961File Number: HIST UST: 511 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster H 0.097 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 1565 WEST MABLE N/A H46 HIST USTGENERAL VAN AND STORAGE S118410542 TC4901213.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.93586Longitude: 33.83334Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 4469Facility ID: UST: 513 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster I 0.097 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NE 255 N MANCHESTER AVE N/A I47 USTPHILLIPS CO U003713289 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92801Owner City,St,Zip: 246 N. MANCHESTEROwner Address: PHILLIPS CO.Owner Name: 7147768100Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: DISTRIBUTOROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000005974Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 554 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster I 0.105 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NE 246 N MANCHESTER AVE N/A I48 HIST USTPHILLIPS CO.U001578561 1666 W PAMPAS LNAddress: 2002Year: ESTRADA CLEANING SERVICESName: EDR Historical Cleaners: 570 ft. 0.108 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 129 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW 1666 W PAMPAS LN N/A 49 EDR Hist Cleaner 1015002407 TC4901213.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: EDWARD MCCLONEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 W EMBASSYMailing address: CAD037381050EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1526 W EMBASSYFacility address: KEMMER CORPFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 593 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster J 0.112 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 East FINDS1526 W EMBASSY CAD037381050 J50 RCRA-SQGKEMMER CORP 1000297877 TC4901213.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002643168DFR URL: 110002643168Registry ID: 1000297877Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002643168Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: KEMMER CORP (Continued)1000297877 Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 533-6808Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1683 W LINCOLNContact address: GAYE ROELOFSContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 W LINCOLNMailing address: CAD983642752EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1683 W LINCOLNFacility address: AFTER 5 TUX SHOPSFacility name: 07/07/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 613 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster K 0.116 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. < 1/8 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW FINDS1683 W LINCOLN CAD983642752 K51 RCRA-SQGAFTER 5 TUX SHOPS 1000818404 TC4901213.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015502Mailing City,St,Zip: 1683 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146806808Telephone: GAYE ROELOFSContact: CAD983642752GEPAID: 1996Year: 1000818404envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002880687Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 680-6808Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1683 W LINCOLNOwner/operator address: GAYE ROELOFSOwner/operator name: AFTER 5 TUX SHOPS (Continued)1000818404 TC4901213.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002880687DFR URL: 110002880687Registry ID: 1000818404Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .6485Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015502Mailing City,St,Zip: 1683 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146806808Telephone: GAYE ROELOFSContact: CAD983642752GEPAID: 1995Year: 1000818404envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .4942Tons: AFTER 5 TUX SHOPS (Continued)1000818404 LEADEDContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007443-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 446Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-12-92Action Date: 02-12-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 7443Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.934283Longitude: 33.831723Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 7443Facility ID: UST: 636 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster H 0.120 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE SWEEPS UST1565 W MABLE ST N/A H52 USTGENERAL VAN & STORAGE CO U003939933 TC4901213.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: GENERAL VAN & STORAGE CO (Continued) U003939933 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1565 W MABLE STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147743646Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30007941Facility ID: CA FID UST: 636 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster H 0.120 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 1565 W MABLE ST N/A H53 CA FID USTGENERAL VAN & STORAGE CO S101619849 00000053137Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E7E7.pdfURL: 0002E7E7File Number: HIST UST: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-001230-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-035007Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 1230Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 636 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster H 0.120 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SE HIST UST1541 W BROADWAY N/A H54 SWEEPS USTSHORE MARBLE U001578616 TC4901213.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 01Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RIVERSIDE, CA 92507Owner City,St,Zip: 1510 PALMYRITAOwner Address: COAST PRODUCTSOwner Name: 7147766240Telephone: ED MCCLOSKEYContact Name: WHOLESALE PLUMVING SOther Type: OtherFacility Type: SHORE MARBLE (Continued)U001578616 1522 W EMBASSY STAddress: 2012Year: ARGO MOTOR SPORTSName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 640 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster J 0.121 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East 1522 W EMBASSY ST N/A J55 EDR Hist Auto 1015242844 -117.93533Longitude: 33.83141Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 1750Facility ID: UST: 659 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster J 0.125 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East 1516 W EMBASSY ST N/A J56 USTHARBOR PALLET COMPANY U003779304 LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9350655Longitude: 33.8314201Latitude: T0605901981Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 659 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster J 0.125 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East Orange Co. Industrial Site1516 W EMBASSY ST N/A J57 LUSTHARBOR PALLET COMPANY S103632284 TC4901213.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605901981Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 06/11/1992Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901981Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 03/28/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901981Global Id: 12/01/1994Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901981Global Id: 04/01/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901981Global Id: 04/01/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901981Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901981Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901981Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Insecticides / Pesticide / Fumigants / HerbicidesPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002891TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 03/28/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: HARBOR PALLET COMPANY (Continued) S103632284 TC4901213.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DIOXIN / PCBsReleased Chemical: Transferred to City ProgramClosure Type: CLOSED 7/8/1992Current Status: RO0000302Record ID: 91IC017Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/01/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901981Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 03/28/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: HARBOR PALLET COMPANY (Continued) S103632284 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901164Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901164Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT116LOC Case Number: 083001524TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/25/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9354731Longitude: 33.8313293Latitude: T0605901164Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 659 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster J 0.125 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East HIST CORTESE1516 EMBASSY N/A J58 LUSTHARBOR PALLET CO S101126243 TC4901213.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/25/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 5/2/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901164Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT116Local Case Num: 083001524TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak DiscoveryAction: 05/02/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901164Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 05/02/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901164Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/25/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901164Global Id: 05/02/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901164Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: HARBOR PALLET CO (Continued)S101126243 TC4901213.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/28/1997Close Date: 1/1/1965Enforcement Date: 4/1/1991Discover Date: 12/1/1994Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 4/1/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/1/1996Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901981Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: None TakenEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: PentachlorophenolSubstance: Other ground water affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002891TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9354731Longitude: 33.8313293Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: HARBOR PALLET CO (Continued)S101126243 TC4901213.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002891TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083001524TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: MOTOR OIL, PCE, AND TCESummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9354731Longitude: 33.8313293Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 10/1/1996Enter Date: HARBOR PALLET CO (Continued)S101126243 (714) 774-8416Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1687 W LINCOLNContact address: LUISO JOSEPHContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 W LINCOLNMailing address: CAD983586934EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1687 W LINCOLNFacility address: RAYCO AUTO CENTERSFacility name: 08/07/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 737 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K 0.140 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW FINDS1687 W LINCOLN CAD983586934 K59 RCRA NonGen / NLRRAYCO AUTO CENTERS 1000594809 TC4901213.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002847466Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: JOSEPH S LUISOOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: RAYCO AUTO CENTERS (Continued) 1000594809 TC4901213.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002847466DFR URL: 110002847466Registry ID: 1000594809Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .0666Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD093459485TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015502Mailing City,St,Zip: 1687 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4155551212Telephone: JOSEPH S LUISOContact: CAD983586934GEPAID: 1995Year: 1000594809envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .0333Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD093459485TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928015502Mailing City,St,Zip: 1687 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4155551212Telephone: JOSEPH S LUISOContact: CAD983586934GEPAID: 1996Year: 1000594809envid: HAZNET: RAYCO AUTO CENTERS (Continued) 1000594809 1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-24-94Action Date: 02-28-94Referral Date: 44-016077Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 3646Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 837 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster L 0.159 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 East CA FID UST1512 W LINCOLN AVE N/A L60 SWEEPS USTECONO LUBE N TUNE #45 S101589423 TC4901213.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1512 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149911521Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30011612Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 02-28-94Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003646-000001SWRCB Tank Id: ECONO LUBE N TUNE #45 (Continued) S101589423 hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 772-3400Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1520 W LINCOLN AVEContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 W LINCOLN AVEMailing address: CAD981653314EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1520 W LINCOLN AVEFacility address: JONES AUTO BODY & PAINT COFacility name: 09/13/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 837 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster L 0.159 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92801 East FINDS1520 W LINCOLN AVE CAD981653314 L61 RCRA-SQGJONES AUTO BODY & PAINT CO 1000220372 TC4901213.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110002738592Registry ID: 1000220372Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002738592Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: JONES JEFFOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: JONES AUTO BODY & PAINT CO (Continued) 1000220372 TC4901213.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002738592DFR URL: JONES AUTO BODY & PAINT CO (Continued) 1000220372 -117.93443Longitude: 33.83233Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 3646Facility ID: UST: 837 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster L 0.159 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 East 1512 W LINCOLN AVE # 45 N/A L62 USTECONO LUBE N TUNE #45 U003939593 NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 776-3495Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1555 W BROADWAYOwner/operator address: WISEMAN ENGINEERINGOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 776-3495Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1555 W BROADWAYContact address: CHUCK WISEMANContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 W BROADWAYMailing address: CAD983642166EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1555 W BROADWAYFacility address: WISEMAN ENGINEERINGFacility name: 07/13/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 858 ft. 0.162 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE FINDS1555 W BROADWAY CAD983642166 63 RCRA-SQGWISEMAN ENGINEERING 1000818350 TC4901213.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002880259DFR URL: 110002880259Registry ID: 1000818350Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002880259Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): WISEMAN ENGINEERING (Continued) 1000818350 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001235TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 12/16/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9409778Longitude: 33.8324232Latitude: T0605900959Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 875 ft. Site 1 of 9 in cluster M 0.166 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW HIST UST1680 W LINCOLN AVE N/A M64 LUSTARMOUR OIL COMPANY U001578536 TC4901213.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/09/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900959Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 04/26/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900959Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 12/16/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900959Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/16/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900959Global Id: 08/28/1991Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900959Global Id: 07/26/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900959Global Id: 04/23/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900959Global Id: 04/23/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900959Global Id: Status History: 9513206375Phone Number: rscott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900959Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900959Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: ARMOUR OIL COMPANY (Continued) U001578536 TC4901213.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedYear Installed: 92-4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 92-3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 92-2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 92-1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: SAN DIEGO, CA 92110Owner City,St,Zip: 3500 ESTUDILLO ST.Owner Address: ARMOUR OIL COMPANYOwner Name: 7149999018Telephone: RICK C. ROBERTSContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000008758Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/26/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900959Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/14/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900959Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: ARMOUR OIL COMPANY (Continued) U001578536 TC4901213.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: ARMOUR OIL COMPANY (Continued) U001578536 Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E540.pdfURL: 0002E540File Number: HIST UST: 875 ft. Site 2 of 9 in cluster M 0.166 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1680 W LINCOLN BLVD N/A M65 HIST USTARMOUR OIL COMPANY S118407574 Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E571.pdfURL: 0002E571File Number: HIST UST: 913 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster N 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW 216 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE N/A N66 HIST USTANAHEIM AUTO WASH S118407460 TC4901213.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)S118407460 Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: PICOFARAD INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD060761376EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 237-D N EUCLIDFacility address: PICOFARAD INC.Facility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 970 ft. Site 3 of 9 in cluster M 0.184 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 237-D N EUCLID CAD060761376 M67 RCRA-SQGPICOFARAD INC.1000332380 TC4901213.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/18/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PICOFARAD INC.Site name: 07/24/1980Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PICOFARAD INC.Site name: 02/18/1992Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: PICOFARAD INC. (Continued)1000332380 Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003567TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 02/03/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.941334Longitude: 33.830895Latitude: T0605902329Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1000 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster N 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW HIST UST216 S EUCLID ST N/A N68 LUSTANAHEIM AUTO WASH U001578592 TC4901213.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/03/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902329Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 06/10/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902329Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/03/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902329Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/03/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902329Global Id: 09/15/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902329Global Id: 06/10/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902329Global Id: 06/10/1999Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902329Global Id: Status History: 9517824903Phone Number: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902329Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902329Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)U001578592 TC4901213.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 005Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: #1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0005Total Tanks: NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Owner City,St,Zip: 260 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVEOwner Address: BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC.Owner Name: 7149563521Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: RETAIL GAS CAR WASHOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000043008Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 06/10/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902329Global Id: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)U001578592 TC4901213.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: 5Container Num: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)U001578592 .258Max MTBE Soil: 1MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.941334Longitude: 33.830895Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 11/4/1999Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/3/2000Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 6/10/1999Discover Date: 9/15/1999Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 6/10/1999Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 11/4/1999Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902329Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: LINCOLNCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003567TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1000 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster N 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW HIST CORTESE216 N/A N69 LUSTCARWASH OF AMERICA S104405117 TC4901213.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083003567TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: NoWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: CARWASH OF AMERICA (Continued) S104405117 M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004494-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 4494Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004494-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 4494Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1000 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster N 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW CA FID UST216 S EUCLID ST N/A N70 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM AUTO WASH S101619847 TC4901213.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30017723Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004494-000005SWRCB Tank Id: 5Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 4494Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004494-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 4Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 4494Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 12-16-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004494-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 3Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 12-16-92Action Date: 12-16-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 4494Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)S101619847 TC4901213.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 260 NEWPORT CENTER DRMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149563521Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: ANAHEIM AUTO WASH (Continued)S101619847 -117.9393925Longitude: 33.8325012Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 4494Facility ID: UST: 1000 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster N 0.189 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW 216 S EUCLID ST N/A N71 USTBEACON BAY AUTO WASH U003782857 UTNKIRegulated By: 30007331Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 1000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-003467-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 3467Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1041 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster N 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/8-1/4 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW CA FID UST215 S EUCLID ST N/A N72 SWEEPS USTWOODY CHEVROLET S101619853 TC4901213.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 13501Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5511SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 13501Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: InactiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 215 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149913100Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: WOODY CHEVROLET (Continued)S101619853 TC4901213.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92802Owner City,St,Zip: 215 S. EUCLIDOwner Address: WOODY CHEVROLET, INC.Owner Name: 7149913100Telephone: SHERWOOD OKLEJASContact Name: CAR DEALERSHIPOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000064285Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0001F121.pdfURL: 0001F121File Number: HIST UST: 1041 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster N 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW 215 S EUCLID N/A N73 HIST USTWOODY CHEVROLET INC U001578626 SHERWOOD OKLEJASOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 991-3100Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 90802 215 S EUCLIDContact address: KIRK MICHENERContact: CAD981971773EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 215 S EUCLIDFacility address: ANAHEIM CHEVROLET GEOFacility name: 09/25/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1041 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster N 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW FINDS215 S EUCLID CAD981971773 N74 RCRA-SQGANAHEIM CHEVROLET GEO 1000193697 TC4901213.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110009540657Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 991-3100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 215 S EUCLIDOwner/operator address: ANAHEIM CHEVROLET GEO (Continued) 1000193697 TC4901213.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110009540657DFR URL: 110009540657Registry ID: 1000193697Envid: ECHO: ANAHEIM CHEVROLET GEO (Continued) 1000193697 MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 32Max MTBE Soil: 3MTBE Concentration: 1.1Max MTBE GW: 1/15/2002MTBE Date: -117.9416291Longitude: 33.83242214Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: =GW Qualifies: 2/10/1998Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 9/3/1998Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/14/1997Discover Date: 3/31/1998Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 3/26/1997Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 2/10/1998Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902046Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: LINCOLNCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002987TCase Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1042 ft. Site 4 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 101 EUCLID ST N/A M75 LUSTMOBIL #18-GY7 S106784778 TC4901213.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMOVED IN APRIL. FURTHER SITE ASSESSMENT NEEDED. SITE IS BEING DISMANTLED. MTBE DETECTED IN SOIL 32 PPM AT 20 FT. UST TO BESummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: SWStaff Initials: RSStaff: DMTBE Class: MOBIL #18-GY7 (Continued)S106784778 9513206375Phone Number: rscott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902046Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902046Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002987TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 10/08/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9416131Longitude: 33.8324181Latitude: T0605902046Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1042 ft. Site 5 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW HIST UST101 S EUCLID ST N/A M76 LUSTMOBIL #18-GY7 U001578610 TC4901213.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EB9C.pdfURL: 0002EB9CFile Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/14/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/13/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/08/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 07/01/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 11/15/2000Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 03/26/1997Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902046Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/08/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902046Global Id: 09/03/1998Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902046Global Id: 03/31/1998Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902046Global Id: 03/26/1997Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902046Global Id: 03/14/1997Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902046Global Id: Status History: MOBIL #18-GY7 (Continued)U001578610 TC4901213.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Owner City,St,Zip: 612 S. FLOWER STREETOwner Address: MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner Name: 7145333300Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000039294Facility ID: STATERegion: MOBIL #18-GY7 (Continued)U001578610 TC4901213.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 12/16/2015Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: GARFIELD BEACH CVS LLCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/04/2009Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (612) 304-6073Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 NICOLLET MALLOwner/operator address: TARGET CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: NICOLE.WILKINSON@CVSHEALTH.COMContact email: (401) 770-7132Contact telephone: USContact country: WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 ONE CVS DR MAIL CODE 2340Contact address: NICOLE WILKINSONContact: WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 ONE CVS DRMailing address: CAR000258699EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 101 S EUCLID ST STE BFacility address: CVS PHARMACY #17478Facility name: 02/16/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 1042 ft. Site 6 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW ECHO101 S EUCLID ST STE B CAR000258699 M77 RCRA-CESQGCVS PHARMACY #17478 1018273696 TC4901213.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 791. Waste name: 791. Waste code: 561. Waste name: 561. Waste code: 541. Waste name: 541. Waste code: 352. Waste name: 352. Waste code: 331. Waste name: 331. Waste code: 311. Waste name: 311. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: 141. Waste name: 141. Waste code: 134. Waste name: 134. Waste code: 123. Waste name: 123. Waste code: 122. Waste name: 122. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: CVS PHARMACY #17478 (Continued) 1018273696 TC4901213.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110067552678DFR URL: 110067552678Registry ID: 1018273696Envid: ECHO: No violations foundViolation Status: SELENIUM SULFIDE (OR) SELENIUM SULFIDE SES2 (R,T). Waste name: U205. Waste code: 1,3-BENZENEDIOL (OR) RESORCINOL. Waste name: U201. Waste code: PHENOL. Waste name: U188. Waste code: 5ALPHA, 6BETA)- (OR) LINDANE CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEXACHLORO-, (1ALPHA, 2ALPHA, 3BETA, 4ALPHA,. Waste name: U129. Waste code: FORMALDEHYDE. Waste name: U122. Waste code: CHLOROFORM (OR) METHANE, TRICHLORO-. Waste name: U044. Waste code: ACETALDEHYDE, TRICHLORO- (OR) CHLORAL. Waste name: U034. Waste code: SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: M-CRESOL. Waste name: D024. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: CVS PHARMACY #17478 (Continued) 1018273696 TC4901213.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/23/2008Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/23/2008Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (800) 587-2228Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 1000 NICOLLET MALLOwner/operator address: TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: CORPORATE.COMPLIANCE@TARGET.COMContact email: (800) 587-2228Contact telephone: USContact country: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 P.O. BOX 111Contact address: JANNA ADAIR-POTTSContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 P.O. BOX 111Mailing address: CAL000333812EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 101 S EUCLID STFacility address: TARGET #2421Facility name: 06/24/2010Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1042 ft. Site 7 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 101 S EUCLID ST CAL000333812 M78 RCRA-LQGTARGET #2421 1014386982 TC4901213.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 791. Waste name: 791. Waste code: 561. Waste name: 561. Waste code: 331. Waste name: 331. Waste code: 311. Waste name: 311. Waste code: 291. Waste name: 291. Waste code: 232. Waste name: 232. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: 141. Waste name: 141. Waste code: 123. Waste name: 123. Waste code: 122. Waste name: 122. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): TARGET #2421 (Continued)1014386982 TC4901213.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: & ESTERS (OR) DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID 2,4-D 2,4-D, SALTS & ESTERS (OR) ACETIC ACID, (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY)-, SALTS. Waste name: U240. Waste code: 2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: SALTS NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &. Waste name: P075. Waste code: ALPHA-DIMETHYL- ALPHA,ALPHA-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE (OR) BENZENEETHANAMINE, ALPHA,. Waste name: P046. Waste code: SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: TARGET #2421 (Continued)1014386982 M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-11-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002398-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 18-GY7-2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-11-92Action Date: 08-11-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 2398Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-11-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002398-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 18-GY7-1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-11-92Action Date: 08-11-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 2398Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1042 ft. Site 8 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW CA FID UST101 S EUCLID ST N/A M79 SWEEPS USTMOBIL STATION (18-GY7)S101589150 TC4901213.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 3225 GALLOWS RDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147727797Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30001753Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 08-11-92Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002398-000006SWRCB Tank Id: 18-GY7-4Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-11-92Action Date: 08-11-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 2398Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-11-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002398-000005SWRCB Tank Id: 18-GY7-3Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-11-92Action Date: 08-11-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 2398Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: MOBIL STATION (18-GY7) (Continued)S101589150 TC4901213.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/23/2008Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 07/23/2008Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (800) 587-2228Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 PO BOX 111Owner/operator address: TARGET CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: POC@TARGET.COMContact email: (800) 587-2228Contact telephone: USContact country: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 PO BOX 111Contact address: STEVE MUSSERContact: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440 PO BOX 111Mailing address: CAR000218768EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 101 S EUCLID STFacility address: TARGET STORE T2421Facility name: 02/19/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1042 ft. Site 9 of 9 in cluster M 0.197 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 128 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 101 S EUCLID ST CAR000218768 M80 RCRA-SQGTARGET STORE T2421 1014465406 TC4901213.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: CRESOL. Waste name: D026. Waste code: M-CRESOL. Waste name: D024. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: 2,4-D (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID). Waste name: D016. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: ARSENIC. Waste name: D004. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: TARGET STORE T2421 (Continued)1014465406 TC4901213.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CARBARYL (OR) 1-NAPHTHALENOL, METHYLCARBAMATE. Waste name: U279. Waste code: 1,3-BENZENEDIOL (OR) RESORCINOL. Waste name: U201. Waste code: (3BETA, 16BETA, 17ALPHA, 18BETA, 20ALPHA)- 11,17-DIMETHOXY-18-[(3,4,5-TRIMETHOXYBENZOYL)OXY]-, METHYL ESTER, RESERPINE (OR) YOHIMBAN-16-CARBOXYLIC ACID,. Waste name: U200. Waste code: PHENOL. Waste name: U188. Waste code: METHANOL (I) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (I). Waste name: U154. Waste code: L-PHENYLALANINE, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) MELPHALAN. Waste name: U150. Waste code: 5ALPHA, 6BETA)- (OR) LINDANE CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEXACHLORO-, (1ALPHA, 2ALPHA, 3BETA, 4ALPHA,. Waste name: U129. Waste code: FORMALDEHYDE. Waste name: U122. Waste code: BENZENE, 1,4-DICHLORO- (OR) P-DICHLOROBENZENE. Waste name: U072. Waste code: 2-OXIDE (OR) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE 2H-1,3,2-OXAZAPHOSPHORIN-2-AMINE, N,N-BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)TETRAHYDRO-,. Waste name: U058. Waste code: CHLOROFORM (OR) METHANE, TRICHLORO-. Waste name: U044. Waste code: BENZENEBUTANOIC ACID, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) CHLORAMBUCIL. Waste name: U035. Waste code: ACETALDEHYDE, TRICHLORO- (OR) CHLORAL. Waste name: U034. Waste code: 2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: 1,2,3-PROPANETRIOL, TRINITRATE (R) (OR) NITROGLYCERINE (R). Waste name: P081. Waste code: SALTS NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &. Waste name: P075. Waste code: EPINEPHRINE 1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)- (OR). Waste name: P042. Waste code: TARGET STORE T2421 (Continued)1014465406 TC4901213.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P001. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE. Waste name: D028. Waste code: CRESOL. Waste name: D026. Waste code: M-CRESOL. Waste name: D024. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: 2,4-D (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID). Waste name: D016. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: ARSENIC. Waste name: D004. Waste code: REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: TARGET STORE T2421Site name: 03/01/2014Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: TARGET STORE T2421 (Continued)1014465406 TC4901213.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1,3-BENZENEDIOL (OR) RESORCINOL. Waste name: U201. Waste code: (3BETA, 16BETA, 17ALPHA, 18BETA, 20ALPHA)- 11,17-DIMETHOXY-18-[(3,4,5-TRIMETHOXYBENZOYL)OXY]-, METHYL ESTER, RESERPINE (OR) YOHIMBAN-16-CARBOXYLIC ACID,. Waste name: U200. Waste code: PHENOL. Waste name: U188. Waste code: METHANOL (I) (OR) METHYL ALCOHOL (I). Waste name: U154. Waste code: L-PHENYLALANINE, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) MELPHALAN. Waste name: U150. Waste code: 5ALPHA, 6BETA)- (OR) LINDANE CYCLOHEXANE, 1,2,3,4,5,6-HEXACHLORO-, (1ALPHA, 2ALPHA, 3BETA, 4ALPHA,. Waste name: U129. Waste code: FORMALDEHYDE. Waste name: U122. Waste code: BENZENE, 1,4-DICHLORO- (OR) P-DICHLOROBENZENE. Waste name: U072. Waste code: 2-OXIDE (OR) CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE 2H-1,3,2-OXAZAPHOSPHORIN-2-AMINE, N,N-BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)TETRAHYDRO-,. Waste name: U058. Waste code: CHLOROFORM (OR) METHANE, TRICHLORO-. Waste name: U044. Waste code: BENZENEBUTANOIC ACID, 4-[BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL)AMINO]- (OR) CHLORAMBUCIL. Waste name: U035. Waste code: ACETALDEHYDE, TRICHLORO- (OR) CHLORAL. Waste name: U034. Waste code: 2-PROPANONE (I) (OR) ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: 1,2,3-PROPANETRIOL, TRINITRATE (R) (OR) NITROGLYCERINE (R). Waste name: P081. Waste code: SALTS NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &. Waste name: P075. Waste code: EPINEPHRINE 1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)- (OR). Waste name: P042. Waste code: SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: TARGET STORE T2421 (Continued)1014465406 TC4901213.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: SALTS NICOTINE, & SALTS (OR) PYRIDINE, 3-(1-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDINYL)-,(S)-, &. Waste name: P075. Waste code: ALPHA-DIMETHYL- ALPHA,ALPHA-DIMETHYLPHENETHYLAMINE (OR) BENZENEETHANAMINE, ALPHA,. Waste name: P046. Waste code: SALTS, WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% (OR) WARFARIN, & 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: 2,4-D (2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXYACETIC ACID). Waste name: D016. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: TARGET STORE NO 2421Site name: 04/11/2011Date form received by agency: CARBARYL (OR) 1-NAPHTHALENOL, METHYLCARBAMATE. Waste name: U279. Waste code: TARGET STORE T2421 (Continued)1014465406 NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002494Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1102 ft. Site 1 of 13 in cluster O 0.209 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 237-D N. EUCLID N/A O81 ENVIROSTORPICOFARAD, INC.S110494162 TC4901213.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003714Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002799Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002494Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD060761376Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9414Longitude: 33.83392Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: PICOFARAD, INC. (Continued)S110494162 RACHEL R MILLSContact: BUENA PARK, CA 906201828 WESTERN AVEMailing address: CAR000140657EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 231 EUCLID STFacility address: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARKFacility name: 12/30/2002Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1126 ft. Site 2 of 13 in cluster O 0.213 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 141 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW FINDS231 EUCLID ST CAR000140657 O82 RCRA-SQGEUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK 1006805741 TC4901213.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/30/2002Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/23/1987Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: DONLAN INVESTMENTSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/23/1987Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: DONLAN INVESTMENTSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (909) 658-0114Contact telephone: USContact country: BUENA PARK, CA 906201828 WESTERN AVEContact address: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK (Continued) 1006805741 TC4901213.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110014377129DFR URL: 110014377129Registry ID: 1006805741Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 3.85Tons: Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method: Contaminated soil from site clean-upWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: BUENA PARK, CA 906201828Mailing City,St,Zip: 7121 WESTERN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: Not reportedTelephone: ENVIRONMENTAL MNGRContact: CAR000140657GEPAID: 2004Year: 1006805741envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110014377129Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARKSite name: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK (Continued) 1006805741 12/18/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: ECHO HAZNET 1145 ft.FINDSSite 1 of 3 in cluster P 0.217 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM, CA 92801 East UST1440 W LINCOLN AVE CAD983582693 P83 RCRA-SQGJIFFY LUBE 1000594439 TC4901213.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 774-5823Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1440 W LINCOLN AVEOwner/operator address: JIFFY LUBEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 774-5823Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1440 W LINCOLN AVEContact address: RICHARD HYNANContact: CAD983582693EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 1440 W LINCOLN AVEFacility address: JIFFY LUBEFacility name: JIFFY LUBE (Continued)1000594439 TC4901213.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002844593Registry ID: FINDS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 23436 MADEROMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147745823Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30009994Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedSTG: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedSWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 06-30-90Created Date: 03-19-92Action Date: 03-19-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 10786Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.93365Longitude: 33.83221Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 10786Facility ID: UST: No violations foundViolation Status: JIFFY LUBE (Continued)1000594439 TC4901213.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1994Year: 1000594439envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 2.2100Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928010000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1440 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147745823Telephone: JIFFY LUBEContact: CAD983582693GEPAID: 1994Year: 1000594439envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.8378Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928010000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1440 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147745823Telephone: JIFFY LUBEContact: CAD983582693GEPAID: 1994Year: 1000594439envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 1.6221Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928010000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1440 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147745823Telephone: JIFFY LUBEContact: CAD983582693GEPAID: 1995Year: 1000594439envid: HAZNET: JIFFY LUBE (Continued)1000594439 TC4901213.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002844593DFR URL: 110002844593Registry ID: 1000594439Envid: ECHO: additional CA_HAZNET: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2293Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928010000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1440 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147745823Telephone: JIFFY LUBEContact: CAD983582693GEPAID: 1993Year: 1000594439envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .6880Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD099452708TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928010000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1440 W LINCOLN AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147745823Telephone: JIFFY LUBEContact: CAD983582693GEPAID: JIFFY LUBE (Continued)1000594439 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 313 B N EUCLID WYContact address: WAYNE YARYContact: CAD983624388EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 313 B N EUCLID WYFacility address: COAST COLORFacility name: 03/26/1992Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1170 ft. Site 3 of 13 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW FINDS313 B N EUCLID WY CAD983624388 O84 RCRA-SQGCOAST COLOR 1000685784 TC4901213.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1000685784Envid: ECHO: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002871633Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (213) 535-5600Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 313 B N EUCLID WYOwner/operator address: WAYNE R YARYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 635-8680Contact telephone: USContact country: COAST COLOR (Continued)1000685784 TC4901213.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002871633DFR URL: 110002871633Registry ID: COAST COLOR (Continued)1000685784 Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000725Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: Not reportedAssembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 08/30/2007Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 60000725Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1170 ft. Site 4 of 13 in cluster O 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 313-353 EUCLID WAY N/A O85 ENVIROSTORTOWER PARK INDUSTRIAL S108936063 TC4901213.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147725091Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30003487Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002990-000007SWRCB Tank Id: 858Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 2990Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 7500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-002990-000006SWRCB Tank Id: 858Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 2990Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1178 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster Q 0.223 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE CA FID UST1524 MABLE ST N/A Q86 SWEEPS USTWILSON & HAMPTON PAINTING S101589209 TC4901213.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAT080013808EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92804 1524 MABLE STFacility address: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1178 ft.ECHOSite 2 of 5 in cluster Q 0.223 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 ICISANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE RAATS1524 MABLE STREET CAT080013808 Q87 RCRA-SQGWILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRS 1000385057 TC4901213.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation FR - 268.7Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/08/1990 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: 02/26/1990Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.50-60Regulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/08/1990 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: 02/26/1990Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.20-23.BRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/08/1990 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: 02/26/1990Date violation determined: Transporters - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 263Regulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSSite name: 12/04/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRS (Continued) 1000385057 TC4901213.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFacility NAICS Code: 7205Program System Acronym: Not reportedPermit Type Desc: -117.93361Longitude in Decimal Degrees: 33.829761Latitude in Decimal Degrees: Not reportedFederal Facility ID: 1721Facility SIC Code: 3008AEA Type Code: Administrative - FormalEnforcement Action Forum Desc: ICISProgram System Acronym: ORANGEFacility County: RCRA 3008A AO For Comp And/Or PenaltyEnforcement Action Type: ANAHEIM, CA 92804 1524 MABLE STFacility Address: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility Name: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTING CONTRACTORSAction Name: 110002946331FRS ID: 08-1991-0003Enforcement Action ID: ICIS: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: Transporters - GeneralArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 02/26/1990Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 02/26/1990Evaluation date: EPAEvaluation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: NON-FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: 02/26/1990Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 09/20/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/08/1990 Enforcement action date: INITIAL 3008(A) COMPLIANCE Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 09/20/1994Date achieved compliance: 02/26/1990Date violation determined: LDR - GeneralArea of violation: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRS (Continued) 1000385057 TC4901213.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance System (PCS) which supports the NPDES and will integrate it Headquarters. A future release of ICIS will replace the Permit information is maintained in ICIS by EPA in the Regional offices and Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions. This a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all replace EPA’s independent databases that contain Enforcement data with information across most of EPA’s programs. The vision for ICIS is to complete, will contain integrated Enforcement and Compliance Compliance Information System and provides a database that, when ICIS (Integrated Compliance Information System) is the Integrated STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR Environmental Interest/Information System 110002946331Registry ID: FINDS: 1721SIC Code: Not reportedNAIC Code: NoFed Facility: NTribal Indicator: 1524 MABLE STREETAddress: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility Name: 1721SIC Code: Not reportedNAIC Code: NoFed Facility: NTribal Indicator: 1524 MABLE STREETAddress: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility Name: 1721SIC Code: Not reportedNAIC Code: NoFed Facility: NTribal Indicator: 1524 MABLE STREETAddress: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility Name: 1721SIC Code: Not reportedNAIC Code: NoFed Facility: NTribal Indicator: 1524 MABLE STREETAddress: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRSFacility Name: Not reportedTribal Land Code: WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRS (Continued) 1000385057 TC4901213.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002946331DFR URL: 110002946331Registry ID: 1000385057Envid: ECHO: Incident Tracking, Compliance Assistance, and Compliance Monitoring. that support Compliance and Enforcement programs. These include; has the capability to track other activities occurring in the Region that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also WILSON & HAMPTON PAINTNG CONTRCTRS (Continued) 1000385057 -117.93269Longitude: 33.8311347Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 2990Facility ID: UST: 1178 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster Q 0.223 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE 1524 W MABLE ST N/A Q88 USTWILSON & HAMPTON PAINTING CONTRACTORS INC U003981934 8/2/1991Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 1/14/1998Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/22/1991Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 8/15/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 7/20/1991Enter Date: 4/22/1991How Stopped Date: T0605901402Global ID: PipingLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: OMHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: BROADWAYCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Regular GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001880TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1179 ft. Site 1 of 12 in cluster R 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 260 EUCLID ST N/A R89 LUSTEXXON SERVICE STATION #7727 S102429531 TC4901213.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9413526Longitude: 33.82901564Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 7/20/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 10/4/1991Date Pollution Characterization Began: EXXON SERVICE STATION #7727 (Continued) S102429531 -117.939714Longitude: 33.830553Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 5078Facility ID: UST: 1179 ft. Site 2 of 12 in cluster R 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 260 S EUCLID ST N/A R90 USTNOEL ENTERPRISES (EXXON #7-7727) U003781866 Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000285Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 5078Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1179 ft. Site 3 of 12 in cluster R 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW CA FID UST260 S EUCLID ST N/A R91 SWEEPS USTEXXON #7-7727 S101589061 TC4901213.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActive Date: 8000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-005078-000007SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000285Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 5078Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: PETROLEUMTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 1000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-005078-000006SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000285Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 5078Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 8000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-005078-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000285Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 5078Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 8000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-005078-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: EXXON #7-7727 (Continued)S101589061 TC4901213.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 4550 DACOMAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7145338530Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30001173Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: EXXON #7-7727 (Continued)S101589061 cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901402Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001880TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 01/14/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.941058Longitude: 33.829199Latitude: T0605901402Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1179 ft. Site 4 of 12 in cluster R 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW HIST UST260 S EUCLID ST N/A R92 LUSTEXXON SERVICE STATION #7727 U001560177 TC4901213.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04/22/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901402Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/13/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901402Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/14/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901402Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 07/09/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901402Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 04/22/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901402Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/14/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901402Global Id: 10/04/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901402Global Id: 08/15/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901402Global Id: 08/02/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901402Global Id: 04/22/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901402Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901402Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: EXXON SERVICE STATION #7727 (Continued) U001560177 TC4901213.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00007000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1982Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: HOUSTON, TX 77210Owner City,St,Zip: 16945 NORTHCHASE BLVD.Owner Address: EXXON COMPANY U.S.A.Owner Name: 7145338530Telephone: HARRY MOUNTAFIANContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000024013Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E8CB.pdfURL: 0002E8CBFile Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: EXXON SERVICE STATION #7727 (Continued) U001560177 TC4901213.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: WELSH BILL & DON FRANKOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 991-3131Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N EUCLUD WAT UNIT F2Contact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N EUCLID WAY UNIT F2Mailing address: CAD982052540EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N EUCLUD WAT UNIT F2Facility address: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INCFacility name: 10/05/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1181 ft. Site 5 of 13 in cluster O 0.224 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 146 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW FINDS307 N EUCLUD WAT UNIT F2 CAD982052540 O93 RCRA-SQGBURLINGTON ENGINEERING INC 1000285899 TC4901213.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002789910DFR URL: 110002789910Registry ID: 1000285899Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 2.5284Tons: Disposal, Land FillDisposal Method: Metal sludge (Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ORANGE, CA 928653204Mailing City,St,Zip: 220 W GROVE AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149214045Telephone: WILLIAM P WELSH IIIContact: CAD982052540GEPAID: 1994Year: 1000285899envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002789910Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING INC (Continued) 1000285899 307 N. EUCLID WAY UNIT E 1&2Facility address: POWDERCOAT SERVICESFacility name: 06/11/1981Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1181 ft. Site 6 of 13 in cluster O 0.224 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 146 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 307 N. EUCLID WAY UNIT E 1&2 CAT080033269 O94 RCRA NonGen / NLRPOWDERCOAT SERVICES 1000188059 TC4901213.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 533-2251Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N. EUCLID WAY UNIT E 1&2Contact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N. EUCLID WAY, UNIT E-1&2Mailing address: CAT080033269EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 POWDERCOAT SERVICES (Continued) 1000188059 TC4901213.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: LARRY PRINGLEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 EUCLIDMailing address: CAD981635543EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 277 EUCLIDFacility address: DAISY CLEANERSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1188 ft. Site 7 of 13 in cluster O 0.225 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW FINDS277 EUCLID CAD981635543 O95 RCRA-SQGDAISY CLEANERS 1000390527 TC4901213.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCat Decode: 0.39000000000Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613976TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 277 EUCLIDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635543GEPAID: 1993Year: 1000390527envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.14000000000Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 277 EUCLIDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635543GEPAID: 1993Year: 1000390527envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002732696Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: DAISY CLEANERS (Continued)1000390527 TC4901213.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002732696DFR URL: 110002732696Registry ID: 1000390527Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: DAISY CLEANERS (Continued)1000390527 0MTBE Concentration: 2740Max MTBE GW: 6/30/2004MTBE Date: -117.9412772Longitude: 33.8287064Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: YesInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: =GW Qualifies: 3/25/1988Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 11/7/2003Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 3/25/1988Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 2/22/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 5/16/1988Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 3/25/1988Enter Date: 2/22/1988How Stopped Date: T0605900625Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: EUCLIDCross Street: EDETAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000787TCase Number: Remedial action (cleanup) UnderwayFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1200 ft. Site 5 of 12 in cluster R 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW HIST CORTESE1680 N/A R96 LUSTMOBIL #18-G06 S101299261 TC4901213.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083003182TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083000787TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: RMStaff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 110Max MTBE Soil: MOBIL #18-G06 (Continued)S101299261 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900625Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Gasoline, Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000787TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 02/26/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9412772Longitude: 33.828706396Latitude: T0605900625Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1200 ft. Site 6 of 12 in cluster R 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 90017 SW HIST UST1680 W BROADWAY N/A R97 LUSTDEAN P RICHTER U001560703 TC4901213.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/18/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 04/19/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/25/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 05/21/2004Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 11/07/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 11/05/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 06/03/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/02/2001Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 05/16/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 03/25/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/22/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900625Global Id: Status History: 9513206375Phone Number: rscott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900625Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: DEAN P RICHTER (Continued)U001560703 TC4901213.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605900625Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 03/08/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 05/11/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 02/22/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/26/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 03/27/2009Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/04/2008Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 07/12/2007Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 05/03/2007Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/02/2007Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 05/17/2006Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 02/08/2006Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 12/08/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: 08/29/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900625Global Id: DEAN P RICHTER (Continued)U001560703 TC4901213.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Owner City,St,Zip: 612 S. FLOWER STREETOwner Address: MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner Name: 7145359834Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000039157Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EB77.pdfURL: 0002EB77File Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 02/22/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: ExcavationAction: 06/18/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 02/02/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 07/01/1991Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605900625Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/26/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: DEAN P RICHTER (Continued)U001560703 TC4901213.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: DEAN P RICHTER (Continued)U001560703 -117.9396861Longitude: 33.8298491Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 1274Facility ID: UST: 1200 ft. Site 7 of 12 in cluster R 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 1680 W BROADWAY N/A R98 USTMOBIL- STATION- (18-G06)U003779061 4Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-14-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003555-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 18-606-1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-14-92Action Date: 08-14-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 3555Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1200 ft. Site 8 of 12 in cluster R 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW CA FID UST1680 W BROADWAY N/A R99 SWEEPS USTMOBIL STATION (18-G06)S101588990 TC4901213.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30000757Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 08-14-92Active Date: 550Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003555-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 18-G06-4Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-14-92Action Date: 08-14-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 3555Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-14-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003555-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 18-G06-3Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-14-92Action Date: 08-14-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 3555Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-14-92Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003555-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 18-G06-2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 08-14-92Action Date: 08-14-92Referral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 3555Comp Number: ActiveStatus: MOBIL STATION (18-G06) (Continued)S101588990 TC4901213.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92802Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 3225 GALLOWS ROADMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7145359834Facility Phone: MOBIL STATION (18-G06) (Continued) S101588990 05/31/2002Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP.Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (800) 253-8054Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: JOHN HOOVERContact: LAKEWOOD, CO 80228 WEST BAYAUD AVE.Mailing address: CAL000055696EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1680 W BROADWAYFacility address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP.Facility name: 02/28/2002Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1200 ft. Site 9 of 12 in cluster R 0.227 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW FINDS1680 W BROADWAY CAL000055696 R100 RCRA-LQGEXXONMOBIL OIL CORP.1007200089 TC4901213.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System 110055771954Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORP. (Continued) 1007200089 Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EEB0.pdfURL: 0002EEB0File Number: HIST UST: 1205 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster Q 0.228 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 1521 W BRODWAY N/A Q101 HIST USTSYLVANIA LIGHTING SERVICES S118415893 TC4901213.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: SYLVANIA LIGHTING SERVICES (Continued) S118415893 VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009950Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92802Owner City,St,Zip: 1521 W. BROADWAYOwner Address: SYLVANIA LIGHTING SERVICES COROwner Name: 7146355640Telephone: AL GUARINOContact Name: LIGHTING SERVICESOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000002080Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 1205 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster Q 0.228 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 1521 W BROADWAY N/A Q102 HIST USTSYLVANIA LIGHTING SERVICES 1000429423 TC4901213.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.940544Longitude: 33.829893Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 4474Facility ID: UST: 1229 ft. Site 10 of 12 in cluster R 0.233 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 301 S EUCLID ST N/A R103 USTSMOG PROS (ARCO #1795)U003937602 Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901686Global Id: Status History: 9517824903Phone Number: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901686Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901686Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002313TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 06/16/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.941897Longitude: 33.828533Latitude: T0605901686Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1229 ft. Site 11 of 12 in cluster R 0.233 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST USTANAHEIM, CA 92801 SW SWEEPS UST301 S EUCLID AVE N/A R104 LUSTARCO # 1795 S101589241 TC4901213.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 6Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 12000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 07/20/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901686Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 06/16/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901686Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 08/02/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901686Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/13/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901686Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 06/16/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901686Global Id: 07/20/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901686Global Id: 07/20/1993Status Date: ARCO # 1795 (Continued)S101589241 TC4901213.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActive Date: 4000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 4000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: ARCO # 1795 (Continued)S101589241 TC4901213.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004474-000008SWRCB Tank Id: TANK-#2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4474Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004474-000007SWRCB Tank Id: TANK-#1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4474Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 280Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004474-000006SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4474Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: ARCO # 1795 (Continued)S101589241 TC4901213.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E508.pdfURL: 0002E508File Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 550Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004474-000011SWRCB Tank Id: TANK-#5Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4474Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004474-000010SWRCB Tank Id: TANK-#4Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4474Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004474-000009SWRCB Tank Id: TANK-#3Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4474Comp Number: ARCO # 1795 (Continued)S101589241 TC4901213.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 17315 STUDEBAKER ROADMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7147763382Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30004349Facility ID: CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: ARCO # 1795 (Continued)S101589241 0006Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90071Owner City,St,Zip: 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREETOwner Address: ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO.Owner Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000026630Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 1229 ft. Site 12 of 12 in cluster R 0.233 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 SW 301 S EUCLID ST N/A R105 HIST USTGARO MANUELIAN U001578545 TC4901213.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000093Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: 1966Year Installed: 0000000006Container Num: 006Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1984Year Installed: 0000000005Container Num: 005Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1966Year Installed: 0000000004Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1966Year Installed: 0000000003Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1966Year Installed: 0000000002Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 0000000001Container Num: 001Tank Num: GARO MANUELIAN (Continued)U001578545 TC4901213.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9415873Longitude: 33.8288613Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 6/16/1999Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 7/20/1993Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 7/20/1993Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901686Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002313TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1232 ft. Site 8 of 13 in cluster O 0.233 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW 301 EUCLID ST N/A O106 LUSTARCO #1795 S102424406 TC4901213.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: ARCO #1795 (Continued)S102424406 NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: LARRY PRINGLEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 307 EUCLID WAYFacility address: L C PRINGLE SALE INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1249 ft. Site 9 of 13 in cluster O 0.237 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW FINDS307 EUCLID WAY CAD981635246 O107 RCRA-SQGL C PRINGLE SALE INC 1000128413 TC4901213.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .4214Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 307 EUCLID WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246GEPAID: 1999Year: 1000128413envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110009538704Registry ID: FINDS: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/06/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: L C PRINGLE SALE INCSite name: 12/15/1986Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: L C PRINGLE SALE INC (Continued) 1000128413 TC4901213.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCat Decode: .4214Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 307 EUCLID WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246GEPAID: 1997Year: 1000128413envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .0000Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 307 EUCLID WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246GEPAID: 1997Year: 1000128413envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .9303Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 307 EUCLID WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246GEPAID: 1998Year: 1000128413envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: L C PRINGLE SALE INC (Continued)1000128413 TC4901213.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110009538704DFR URL: 110009538704Registry ID: 1000128413Envid: ECHO: 5 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .4214Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981397417TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 307 EUCLID WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981635246GEPAID: 1996Year: 1000128413envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: L C PRINGLE SALE INC (Continued) 1000128413 33.83502Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 71002988Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1249 ft. Site 10 of 13 in cluster O 0.237 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 307 N. EUCLID WAY, F-2 N/A O108 ENVIROSTORBURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC.S118757435 TC4901213.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/13/2000Completed Date: Phase I VerificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002988Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002789910Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD982052540Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - METAL, METAL FINISHING, METAL PLATING - OTHERPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9417Longitude: BURLINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. (Continued) S118757435 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-998-2254Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92803 PO BOX 3700Contact address: MARK NELSONContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92803 PO BOX 3700Mailing address: CAD981391360EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92801 307 N EUCLID WY BLDG H2Facility address: J AND H DEBURRING INCFacility name: 08/13/2009Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: PERCHLOROETHYLENEReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 6/6/1995Current Status: RO0000438Record ID: 93IC025Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: 1249 ft. Site 11 of 13 in cluster O 0.237 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW RCRA NonGen / NLR307 N EUCLID WY BLDG H2 CAD981391360 O109 Orange Co. Industrial SiteJ AND H DEBURRING INC 1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J&H DEBURRING, INC.Site name: 02/15/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRING, INC.Site name: 02/28/1996Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRING INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRING INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRINGSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J&H DEBURRINGSite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: J AND H DEBURRING INC (Continued) 1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: EMI: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 04/06/1994Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 05/14/1992Evaluation date: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/06/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 04/06/1994Date achieved compliance: 05/14/1992Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: FR - 262.10-12.ARegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRING INCSite name: 02/21/1986Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J & H DEBURRING, INC.Site name: 03/31/1992Date form received by agency: J AND H DEBURRING INC (Continued) 1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3499SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3499SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 4Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: J AND H DEBURRING INC (Continued)1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3499SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3499SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3499SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 3Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: J AND H DEBURRING INC (Continued)1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.005405Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.0004783SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.0749NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.02014Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.03Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.043636Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3471SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2621Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: J AND H DEBURRING INC (Continued) 1000116500 TC4901213.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003714Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002799Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002494Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981391360Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: Not reportedAssembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002799Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1249 ft. Site 12 of 13 in cluster O 0.237 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 138 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 307 N. EUCLID WAY #H N/A O110 ENVIROSTORJ&H DEBURRING, INC.S103651425 TC4901213.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/31/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901805Global Id: 10/28/1994Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901805Global Id: 10/14/1994Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901805Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901805Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901805Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002574TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 07/31/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9323478Longitude: 33.8312728Latitude: T0605901805Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1267 ft. 0.240 mi.NPDES Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92805 East Orange Co. Industrial Site101 N MANCHESTER AVE N/A 111 LUSTIMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY S101335413 TC4901213.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 10/28/1994Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 12/13/1994Enter Date: 10/14/1994How Stopped Date: T0605901805Global ID: TankLeak Source: CorrosionLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: CENTERCross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002574TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/14/1994Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: File reviewAction: 10/11/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 07/31/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 07/31/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 10/14/1994Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 10/14/1994Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901805Global Id: Regulatory Activities: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY (Continued) S101335413 TC4901213.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 288934Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: 083002574TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: WASTE (OR SLOP) OIL; ORGANIC COMPOUNDSReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 1/16/1997Current Status: RO0000542Record ID: 96IC021Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.932186Longitude: 33.8311443Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 12/13/1994Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 7/31/1995Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/14/1994Discover Date: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY (Continued)S101335413 TC4901213.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-776-9900EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: oparada07@yahoo.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-299-1194OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Oscar ParadaOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92802OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnaheimOPERATOR CITY: 101 N Manchester AveOPERATOR ADDRESS: Import Auto Supply SalvageOPERATOR NAME: oparada07@yahoo.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-776-9900FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Oscar ParadaFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 27000PLACE SIZE: 5/25/2005STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 5/25/2005PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I019544WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY (Continued)S101335413 TC4901213.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92802Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnaheimDischarge City: 101 N Manchester AveDischarge Address: Import Auto Supply SalvageDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 05/25/2005Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I019544WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 288934Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 5015-Motor Vehicle Parts, UsedPRIMARY SIC: 28-JUL-15CERTIFICATION DATE: OwnerCERTIFIER TITLE: Oscar ParadaCERTIFIER NAME: Storm DrainRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY (Continued)S101335413 TC4901213.2s Page 161 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY FACILITY (Continued) S101335413 33.83502Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Manny AlonzoSupervisor: Irena EdwardsProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 4.5Acres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: 540070Site Code: 07/22/2015Status Date: ActiveStatus: 71003714Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1299 ft. Site 13 of 13 in cluster O 0.246 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 130 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 231-307 NORTH EUCLID WAY N/A O112 ENVIROSTOREUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK S110493832 TC4901213.2s Page 162 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 12/11/2001Completed Date: Consent AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Second Collection letter sent certified mail.Comments: 05/04/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CompletedComments: 11/04/2010Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Inspection report sent on 1/1/2001Comments: 01/01/2001Completed Date: Phase I VerificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Reminder sent for unpaid past due invoice.Comments: 04/01/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CompletedComments: 07/29/2015Completed Date: Consent AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003714Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002799Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002494Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 540070Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD981391360Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD060761376Alias Name: CSS, IA, OTH, SOIL, SVPotential Description: 1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis Trichloroethylene (TCE 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethylene (PCE 1,1-DichloroethaneConfirmed COC: 1,1-Dichloroethylene 1,2-Dichloroethylene (cis 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Tetrachloroethylene (PCE Trichloroethylene (TCE 1,1-DichloroethanePotential COC: OTHER DEGREASING FACILITY, DRY CLEANING, METAL FINISHING, METAL PLATING -Past Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9417Longitude: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK (Continued) S110493832 TC4901213.2s Page 163 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/23/2015Completed Date: Pilot Study/Treatability WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/28/2011Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/16/2011Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/10/2011Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/10/2011Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: completedComments: 10/25/2010Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CompletedComments: 10/18/2010Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Final Demand letter sent certified mail.Comments: 06/17/2011Completed Date: Letter - DemandCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/16/2016Completed Date: Monitoring PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK (Continued) S110493832 TC4901213.2s Page 164 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Corrective Measures Proposal ApprovalFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Community ProfileFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2017Future Due Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: Acknowledgement of SatisfactionFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: Land Use RestrictionFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/23/2015Completed Date: EUCLID WAY INDUSTRIAL PARK (Continued) S110493832 Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 4/18/1993Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901683Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002309TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1339 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster P 0.254 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East HIST CORTESE110 MANCHESTER AVE N/A P113 LUSTIMPORT AUTO SUPPLY S102852344 TC4901213.2s Page 165 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083002309TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.932199Longitude: 33.8314473Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/30/1996Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 2/19/1993Discover Date: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY (Continued) S102852344 ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 03/30/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.932199Longitude: 33.8314473Latitude: T0605901683Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1376 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster P 0.261 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 East 110 N MANCHESTER AVE N/A P114 LUSTIMPORT AUTO SUPPLY S101307724 TC4901213.2s Page 166 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak DiscoveryAction: 02/19/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901683Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 03/30/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901683Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/28/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901683Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 03/30/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901683Global Id: 04/18/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901683Global Id: 02/19/1993Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901683Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901683Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901683Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002309TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: IMPORT AUTO SUPPLY (Continued) S101307724 TC4901213.2s Page 167 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIMFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 08/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: CA Not reportedAlias Address: HOME OIL COAlias Name: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): 13004003.00000Person ID: 13299604.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13293746.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13288151.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0900123Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD027830678EPA ID: 900123Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: ECHO HAZNET FINDS SSTS 1786 ft.HIST USTSite 1 of 5 in cluster S 0.338 mi.LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ENVIROSTORANAHEIM, CA 92803 ESE RCRA-SQG1422 W BROADWAY CAD027830678 S115 SEMS-ARCHIVEHOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 168 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM A CORPOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92803 PO BOX 3580Mailing address: CAD027830678EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92803 1422 W BROADWAYFacility address: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 169 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04/14/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.Comments: 10/25/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30510020Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: * CONTAMINATED SOILPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8980Longitude: 33.83653Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/14/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30510020Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 02/08/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIMSite name: 08/15/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 170 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605927641Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605927641Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Diesel, GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003921TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: CABCase Worker: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: 04/12/2010Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.931499999998Longitude: 33.8287730666667Latitude: T0605927641Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED I’D VIA TELEPHONE DIRECTORY (1966) OIL & GAS COComments: 08/15/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE CERCLA GRANT PA REQ’D.Comments: 04/23/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: INCLUDES WST OILS AND SMALL QUANITIES OF SOLVENTS. WST ARE RECYCLED PRELIM ASSESS DONE ONLY WST GENERATED IS FROM THE MACHINE SHOP WHICHComments: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 171 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605927641Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 09/24/2012Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: ExcavationAction: 03/29/2011Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/12/2010Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 09/18/2008Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 09/04/2005Status Date: Open - InactiveStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 03/26/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 09/23/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 04/10/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 01/24/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 04/19/2002Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605927641Global Id: 09/18/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605927641Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 172 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/05/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 03/13/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 04/28/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 11/10/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: MeetingAction: 02/25/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 09/29/2010Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Email CorrespondenceAction: 12/14/2015Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Interim Remedial Action ReportAction: 05/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 05/05/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 09/18/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Notice of ViolationAction: 09/25/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 173 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Warning LetterAction: 04/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 04/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/30/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: File reviewAction: 04/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 09/12/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 12/28/2011Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 07/15/2012Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Responded Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan - Addendum - RegulatorAction: 11/13/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 09/21/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 03/28/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/19/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 174 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Request for Closure - Regulator RespondedAction: 09/09/2015Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Request for Closure - Regulator RespondedAction: 06/22/2015Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Email Correspondence - Regulator RespondedAction: 02/25/2016Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Email Correspondence - Regulator RespondedAction: 11/09/2015Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 06/14/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 05/21/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 10/01/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation Workplan - Regulator RespondedAction: 07/17/2014Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Request for Closure - Regulator RespondedAction: 04/24/2014Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 10/30/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/31/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 175 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Verbal CommunicationAction: 11/24/2015Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: File reviewAction: 12/05/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Pilot Study/ Treatability ReportAction: 07/14/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action Plan - AddendumAction: 07/14/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Preparation of Agenda ItemAction: 09/19/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 04/12/2010Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review SummaryAction: 12/11/2014Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 03/30/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 09/22/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Preparation of Record for Appeal/Referral/PetitionAction: 08/02/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 02/16/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: * No ActionAction: 07/05/2005Date: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 176 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 10/09/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 07/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 01/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 10/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 10/31/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 177 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92803Owner City,St,Zip: 1422 W. BROADWAYOwner Address: HOME OIL CO. OF ANAHEIMOwner Name: 7145352126Telephone: ROBERT V. BARTONContact Name: BULK PLANTOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000022629Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E9D2.pdfURL: 0002E9D2File Number: HIST UST: Other Report / DocumentAction: 12/01/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 04/01/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 04/01/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 11/04/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/18/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 06/06/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 11/03/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605927641Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 06/10/2003Date: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 178 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPesticide RUP report: Not reportedZero product: Not reportedRegion: Marketed in the United StatesMarket: GUOM: All other productsProduct Use: Not reportedProduct Class: Technical material or active ingredientProduct Type: 01018200392Product Number: RegisteredPermit: 1996Report Year: 046024CA 001Registration Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedContact: VAPAM HLProduct: Not reportedPesticide RUP report: Not reportedZero product: Not reportedRegion: Marketed in the United StatesMarket: Not reportedUOM: Restricted use onlyProduct Use: Other Pesticides (includes insect repellents such as DEET)Product Class: Repackaged or relabeledProduct Type: 00548100423034704Product Number: RegisteredPermit: Not reportedReport Year: 046024CA 001Registration Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedContact: NEMASOL 426Product: SSTS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 10Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued)1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 179 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 1.37Tons: Disposal, OtherDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3580Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7145352126Telephone: MARK LOPEZ MGRContact: CAD027830678GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000197839envid: HAZNET: STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource and settlements. regions and states with cooperative agreements, enforcement actions, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The system tracks inspections in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the NCDB (National Compliance Data Base) supports implementation of the Environmental Interest/Information System 110002639486Registry ID: FINDS: Not reportedPesticide RUP report: Not reportedZero product: Not reportedRegion: Marketed in the United StatesMarket: GUOM: All other productsProduct Use: Not reportedProduct Class: Technical material or active ingredientProduct Type: 00548100468Product Number: RegisteredPermit: 1997Report Year: 046024CA 001Registration Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedContact: VAPAM HLProduct: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 TC4901213.2s Page 180 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002639486DFR URL: 110002639486Registry ID: 1000197839Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .8340Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Tank bottom wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928030000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 3580Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM A CORPContact: CAD027830678GEPAID: 1998Year: 1000197839envid: HOME OIL CO OF ANAHEIM (Continued) 1000197839 9/23/2003Date Pollution Characterization Began: 1/24/2003Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/18/1998Discover Date: 4/10/2003Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 4/19/2002Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/18/1998How Stopped Date: T0605927641Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: PSTHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: SELEnf Type: EUCLIDCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003921TCase Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1786 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster S 0.338 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 ESE CHMIRS1422 W. BROADWAY N/A S116 LUSTHOME OIL COMPANY S105624515 TC4901213.2s Page 181 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 06/12/2002OES notification: 2-3231OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: AGR, PROC, IND, MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 130Max MTBE Soil: 1MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 3/26/2004Date Remediation Plan Submitted: HOME OIL COMPANY (Continued)S105624515 TC4901213.2s Page 182 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ttanks. contamination to the soil, possibly from leaking facility. A report was done stating there was oil is leased to Home Oil Company as an oil storage as an agent for UPRR. UPRR owns the property that The caller is reporting on behalf of UPRR workingDescription: Not reportedComments: Not reportedFatals: Not reportedInjuries: Not reportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: 0Number of Fatalities: 0Number of Injuries: 0Evacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: 0Unknown: 0.000000Gallons: OilSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Industrial PlantSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: Anaheim Fire DepartmentAdmin Agency: 3/4/200212:00:00 AMIncident Date: HDR EngineeringAgency: 2002Year: Not reportedDate/Time: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Responsible PartyCleanup By: Not reportedSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: HOME OIL COMPANY (Continued)S105624515 LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.93104109364Longitude: 33.8289811156431Latitude: T0605900129Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1821 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster S 0.345 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92806 ESE HIST UST1406 W BROADWAY N/A S117 LUSTGALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 183 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/30/2000Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 02/11/2000Status Date: Open - Reopen CaseStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 01/24/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 06/12/1986Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 05/28/1986Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 05/08/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900129Global Id: Status History: 9513206375Phone Number: rscott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900129Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900129Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000169TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RSCase Worker: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: 07/30/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 184 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation * Verbal CommunicationAction: 09/10/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 09/12/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: * Historical EnforcementAction: 01/31/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Interim Remedial Action ReportAction: 11/15/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: UnknownAction: 07/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/17/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 05/08/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/30/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 07/18/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 10/05/2001Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900129Global Id: 05/10/2001Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900129Global Id: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 185 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 02/05/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: MeetingAction: 02/19/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 05/18/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 03/20/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 10/04/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 10/28/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 02/11/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 07/30/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 06/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 05/08/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 01/31/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 186 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Risk Assessment ReportAction: 05/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/10/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: MeetingAction: 06/04/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Request for ClosureAction: 05/24/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 10/10/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Leak BeganAction: 05/08/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Notification - Fee Title Owners NoticeAction: 05/28/2004Date: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 187 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92806Owner City,St,Zip: 1406 W. BROADWAYOwner Address: MERCURY REFUELING, INC.Owner Name: 7147742527Telephone: JEAN MULLISContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000004532Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002EB3B.pdfURL: 0002EB3BFile Number: HIST UST: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: CAP/RAP - Other ReportAction: 07/31/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 08/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Final Remedial Action Report / Corrective Action ReportAction: 05/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: CAP/RAP - Other ReportAction: 05/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900129Global Id: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 TC4901213.2s Page 188 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5171SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 46778Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 2Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 3Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: GALAXY OIL CO, MERCURY REFUELI (Continued) U001578852 Vapor ExtractionAbate Method: 1900Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000169TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1821 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster S 0.345 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92802 ESE SWEEPS UST1406 BROADWAY N/A S118 LUSTGALAXY OIL S103619039 TC4901213.2s Page 189 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 10148Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: RP MERCURY OIL AT 6851 WEST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 PREVIOUSLY CLOSED 1/24/97 BY REGBOARD, HAS NOW BEEN REOPENED 2/11/00. FORMERSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: RSStaff: Not reportedMTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: .035Max MTBE Soil: 2MTBE Concentration: 10Max MTBE GW: 11/1/1999MTBE Date: -117.93254Longitude: 33.8289064Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: <Soil Qualifies: <GW Qualifies: 5/21/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 7/18/2003Date Remedial Action Underway: 8/30/2000Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 6/12/1986Date Pollution Characterization Began: 5/10/2001Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 7/30/2004Close Date: 1/31/2001Enforcement Date: 12/10/1999Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 5/28/1986Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 5/21/1987Enter Date: 5/8/1986How Stopped Date: T0605900129Global ID: UNKLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: CLOSEnf Type: MANCHESTERCross Street: GALAXY OIL (Continued)S103619039 TC4901213.2s Page 190 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083000169TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-010148-000001SWRCB Tank Id: GALAXY OIL (Continued)S103619039 2621Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1836 ft. 0.348 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/4-1/2 , CA 92801 WNW 1747 LINCOLN BLDG. L N/A 119 HIST CORTESEFACILITY 8232-1 S105022416 9/22/2003Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 9/22/2003Date Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/22/2003How Stopped Date: T0605951040Global ID: SLeak Source: SpillLeak Cause: RPPHow Stopped: UMHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: HESSELCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 1Qty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 083003984TLocal Case Num: 083003984TCase Number: Preliminary site assessment underwayFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1903 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster T 0.360 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92815 SE 1436 W. SANTA ANA STREET N/A T120 LUSTAL ROHRS AND SON, INC.S106109177 TC4901213.2s Page 191 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SITE ASSESSMENT TO BE CONDUCTEDSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: SWStaff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: Not reportedOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/22/2003Discover Date: AL ROHRS AND SON, INC. (Continued) S106109177 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003368TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 02/20/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.932042Longitude: 33.827798Latitude: T0605902245Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1903 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster T 0.360 mi.NPDES Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/4-1/2 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE SLIC1436 W SANTA ANA ST N/A T121 LUSTAL ROHRS SON S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 192 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherAction Type: T0605902245Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/14/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902245Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/20/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902245Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 02/16/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902245Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/20/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902245Global Id: 05/11/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902245Global Id: 08/15/1998Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902245Global Id: 08/15/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902245Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902245Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902245Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 193 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5171SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 49880Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5171SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 5460Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 083003984TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.932071Longitude: 33.827842Latitude: 083003984TLead Agency Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: T0605951040Global Id: 08/21/2008Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: Leak DiscoveryAction: 08/15/1998Date: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 194 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 92815Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnaheimDischarge City: PO Box 147Discharge Address: Al Rohrs SonDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 04/20/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I006029WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 208567Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: NPDES: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5171SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 5460Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5171SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 5460Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 195 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 196 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-776-1651EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: alrohrs@sbcglobal.netOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-776-1651OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Vice PresidentOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Donn RohrsOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92815OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnaheimOPERATOR CITY: PO Box 147OPERATOR ADDRESS: Al Rohrs SonOPERATOR NAME: alrohrs@sbcglobal.netFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-776-1651FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Vice PresidentFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Donn RohrsFACILITY CONTACT NAME: AcresPLACE SIZE UNIT: 1PLACE SIZE: 4/20/1992STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 4/20/1992PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I006029WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 208567Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 TC4901213.2s Page 197 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 2999-Products of Petroleum and Coal, NECPRIMARY SIC: 18-MAY-15CERTIFICATION DATE: Vice PresidentCERTIFIER TITLE: Donn RohrsCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: AL ROHRS SON (Continued)S106825519 RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902332Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902332Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003570TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 02/22/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9445023Longitude: 33.8325777Latitude: T0605902332Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1949 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster U 0.369 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW HIST UST1771 W LINCOLN AVE N/A U122 LUSTECONOMY RENTALS INC U001578541 TC4901213.2s Page 198 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 5511 WHITTIER BLVD.Owner Address: ECOMONY RENTALS, INC.Owner Name: 7145333118Telephone: DON MYERSContact Name: EQUIPMENT RENTALOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000004442Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E886.pdfURL: 0002E886File Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/29/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902332Global Id: File reviewAction: 08/14/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902332Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/21/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902332Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 09/29/1999Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902332Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/22/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902332Global Id: 10/18/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902332Global Id: 09/29/1999Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902332Global Id: 09/29/1999Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902332Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: ECONOMY RENTALS INC (Continued) U001578541 TC4901213.2s Page 199 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 013Container Num: 003Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 012Container Num: 002Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 011Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90022Owner City,St,Zip: ECONOMY RENTALS INC (Continued) U001578541 Not reportedCleanup funding: Not reportedAcres cleaned up: Not reportedCompleted date: Not reportedStart date: 78529ACRES property ID: North American Datum of 1983Datum: Center of a Facility or StationPoint of reference: 1’ = 20 mMap scale: Global Positioning Method-Unspecified ParametersHCM label: -117.930978Longitude: 33.82885Latitude: approximately 75 years. agricultural chemicals, petrochemicals, and diesel fuels for The site contained facilities for the transfer and storage ofProperty Description: 4Parcel size: APN 036-050-04, 036-050-30 & 036-050-29Property #: ROSS PARK EXPANSIONProperty name: AssessmentGrant type: Anaheim, City ofRecipient name: US BROWNFIELDS: 1959 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster S 0.371 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 137 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 ESE 318 HESSEL STREET N/A S123 US BROWNFIELDSROSS PARK EXPANSION 1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 200 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation YSoil affected: Not reportedSediments cleaned: Not reportedSediments found: Not reportedPetro products cleaned: YPetro products found: Not reportedPCBs cleaned up: Not reportedPCBs found: Not reportedPAHs cleaned up: YPAHs found: Not reportedOther contams found description: Not reportedOther contaminants found: Not reportedOther metals cleaned: Not reportedOther metals found: Not reportedOther cleaned up: Not reportedUnknown media affected: Not reportedNo media affected: Not reportedLead cleaned up: YLead contaminant found: Not reportedGroundwater cleaned: Not reportedGroundwater affected: Not reportedDrinking water cleaned: Not reportedDrinking water affected: Not reportedControled substance cleaned: Not reportedControled substance found: Not reportedAsbestos cleaned: YAsbestos found: Not reportedAir cleaned: Not reportedAir contaminated: Not reportedState/tribal NFA date: Not reportedState/tribal program ID: Not reportedState/tribal program date: Not reportedIC in place: Not reportedIC in place date: Not reportedIC cat. enforcement permit tools: Not reportedIC cat. gov. controls: Not reportedIC cat. info. devices: Not reportedIC Category proprietary controls: NInstitutional controls required: YesPhoto available: NoVideo available: YesCleanup required: NDid owner change: City of AnaheimCurrent owner: GovernmentOwnership entity: 99958101Cooperative agreement #: 1Accomplishment count: Phase II Environmental AssessmentAccomplishment type: HazardousGrant type: Not reportedCleanup funding entity: HUD - CDBGAssessment funding entity: Not reportedRedevelopment start date: Not reportedRedev. funding entity name: Not reportedRedev. funding source: Not reportedRedevelopment funding: Other Federal FundingAssessment funding source: 30699Assessment funding: Not reportedCleanup funding source: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 201 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20.1%% Unemployed: 350# Unemployed: 5162Meidan Income: 2.9%% Low Income: 2397# Low Income: 8.1%% Below Poverty: 874# Below Poverty: Not reportedRedev Completition Date: Not reportedIC Data Address: Not reportedHighlights: Not reportedPast Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown media cleaned up: Not reportedIndoor air media cleaned up: Not reportedBuilding material media cleaned up: Not reportedMedia affected indoor air: Not reportedMedia affected Bluiding Material: Not reportedFuture Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown contaminant found: Not reportedSVOCs contaminant found: Not reportedSelenium contaminant found: Not reportedPesticides contaminant found: Not reportedNo contaminant found: Not reportedNickel contaminant found: Not reportedMercury contaminant found: Not reportedIron contaminant found: Not reportedCopper contaminant found: Not reportedChromium contaminant found: Not reportedCadmium contaminant found: Not reportedArsenic contaminant found: Not reportedUnknown clean up: Not reportedSVOCs cleaned up: Not reportedSelenium cleaned up: Not reportedPesticides cleaned up: Not reportedNo clean up: Not reportednickel cleaned up: Not reportedmercury cleaned up: Not reportedIron cleaned up: Not reportedCopper cleaned up: Not reportedChromium cleaned up: Not reportedCadmium cleaned up: Not reportedArsenic cleaned up: NSuperfund Fed. landowner flag: Not reportedGreenspace acreage and type: Not reportedFuture use industrial acreage: Not reportedFuture use commercial acreage: Not reportedFuture use residential acreage: Not reportedFuture use greenspace acreage: 4Past use industrial acreage: Not reportedPast use commercial acreage: Not reportedPast use residential acreage: Not reportedPast use greenspace acreage: 0Num. of cleanup and re-dev. jobs: Not reportedCleanup other description: Not reportedVOCs cleaned: YVOCs found: Not reportedSurface water cleaned: Not reportedSoil cleaned up: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 202 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedControled substance cleaned: Not reportedControled substance found: Not reportedAsbestos cleaned: YAsbestos found: Not reportedAir cleaned: Not reportedAir contaminated: Not reportedState/tribal NFA date: Not reportedState/tribal program ID: Not reportedState/tribal program date: Not reportedIC in place: Not reportedIC in place date: Not reportedIC cat. enforcement permit tools: Not reportedIC cat. gov. controls: Not reportedIC cat. info. devices: Not reportedIC Category proprietary controls: NInstitutional controls required: YesPhoto available: NoVideo available: YesCleanup required: NDid owner change: City of AnaheimCurrent owner: GovernmentOwnership entity: 99958101Cooperative agreement #: 1Accomplishment count: Phase II Environmental AssessmentAccomplishment type: HazardousGrant type: Not reportedCleanup funding entity: EPAAssessment funding entity: Not reportedRedevelopment start date: Not reportedRedev. funding entity name: Not reportedRedev. funding source: Not reportedRedevelopment funding: US EPA - Brownfields Assessment Cooperative AgreementAssessment funding source: 200000Assessment funding: Not reportedCleanup funding source: Not reportedCleanup funding: Not reportedAcres cleaned up: Not reportedCompleted date: Not reportedStart date: 78529ACRES property ID: North American Datum of 1983Datum: Center of a Facility or StationPoint of reference: 1’ = 20 mMap scale: Global Positioning Method-Unspecified ParametersHCM label: -117.930978Longitude: 33.82885Latitude: approximately 75 years. agricultural chemicals, petrochemicals, and diesel fuels for The site contained facilities for the transfer and storage ofProperty Description: 4Parcel size: APN 036-050-04, 036-050-30 & 036-050-29Property #: ROSS PARK EXPANSIONProperty name: AssessmentGrant type: Anaheim, City ofRecipient name: 56.3%% Vacant Housing: 125# Vacant Housing: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 203 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNickel contaminant found: Not reportedMercury contaminant found: Not reportedIron contaminant found: Not reportedCopper contaminant found: Not reportedChromium contaminant found: Not reportedCadmium contaminant found: Not reportedArsenic contaminant found: Not reportedUnknown clean up: Not reportedSVOCs cleaned up: Not reportedSelenium cleaned up: Not reportedPesticides cleaned up: Not reportedNo clean up: Not reportednickel cleaned up: Not reportedmercury cleaned up: Not reportedIron cleaned up: Not reportedCopper cleaned up: Not reportedChromium cleaned up: Not reportedCadmium cleaned up: Not reportedArsenic cleaned up: NSuperfund Fed. landowner flag: Not reportedGreenspace acreage and type: Not reportedFuture use industrial acreage: Not reportedFuture use commercial acreage: Not reportedFuture use residential acreage: Not reportedFuture use greenspace acreage: 4Past use industrial acreage: Not reportedPast use commercial acreage: Not reportedPast use residential acreage: Not reportedPast use greenspace acreage: 0Num. of cleanup and re-dev. jobs: Not reportedCleanup other description: Not reportedVOCs cleaned: YVOCs found: Not reportedSurface water cleaned: Not reportedSoil cleaned up: YSoil affected: Not reportedSediments cleaned: Not reportedSediments found: Not reportedPetro products cleaned: YPetro products found: Not reportedPCBs cleaned up: Not reportedPCBs found: Not reportedPAHs cleaned up: YPAHs found: Not reportedOther contams found description: Not reportedOther contaminants found: Not reportedOther metals cleaned: Not reportedOther metals found: Not reportedOther cleaned up: Not reportedUnknown media affected: Not reportedNo media affected: Not reportedLead cleaned up: YLead contaminant found: Not reportedGroundwater cleaned: Not reportedGroundwater affected: Not reportedDrinking water cleaned: Not reportedDrinking water affected: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 204 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00T31501Cooperative agreement #: 0Accomplishment count: Not reportedAccomplishment type: HazardousGrant type: EPACleanup funding entity: Not reportedAssessment funding entity: Not reportedRedevelopment start date: Not reportedRedev. funding entity name: Not reportedRedev. funding source: Not reportedRedevelopment funding: Not reportedAssessment funding source: Not reportedAssessment funding: Brownfields RLF Grant Funds SubgrantedCleanup funding source: 450000Cleanup funding: Not reportedAcres cleaned up: Not reportedCompleted date: 04/01/2010 00:00:00Start date: 78529ACRES property ID: North American Datum of 1983Datum: Center of a Facility or StationPoint of reference: 1’ = 20 mMap scale: Global Positioning Method-Unspecified ParametersHCM label: -117.930978Longitude: 33.82885Latitude: approximately 75 years. agricultural chemicals, petrochemicals, and diesel fuels for The site contained facilities for the transfer and storage ofProperty Description: 4Parcel size: APN 036-050-04, 036-050-30 & 036-050-29Property #: ROSS PARK EXPANSIONProperty name: BCRLFGrant type: Anaheim Redevelopment AgencyRecipient name: 56.3%% Vacant Housing: 125# Vacant Housing: 20.1%% Unemployed: 350# Unemployed: 5162Meidan Income: 2.9%% Low Income: 2397# Low Income: 8.1%% Below Poverty: 874# Below Poverty: Not reportedRedev Completition Date: Not reportedIC Data Address: Not reportedHighlights: Not reportedPast Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown media cleaned up: Not reportedIndoor air media cleaned up: Not reportedBuilding material media cleaned up: Not reportedMedia affected indoor air: Not reportedMedia affected Bluiding Material: Not reportedFuture Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown contaminant found: Not reportedSVOCs contaminant found: Not reportedSelenium contaminant found: Not reportedPesticides contaminant found: Not reportedNo contaminant found: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 205 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture use commercial acreage: Not reportedFuture use residential acreage: Not reportedFuture use greenspace acreage: 4Past use industrial acreage: Not reportedPast use commercial acreage: Not reportedPast use residential acreage: Not reportedPast use greenspace acreage: Not reportedNum. of cleanup and re-dev. jobs: Not reportedCleanup other description: Not reportedVOCs cleaned: YVOCs found: Not reportedSurface water cleaned: Not reportedSoil cleaned up: YSoil affected: Not reportedSediments cleaned: Not reportedSediments found: Not reportedPetro products cleaned: YPetro products found: Not reportedPCBs cleaned up: Not reportedPCBs found: Not reportedPAHs cleaned up: YPAHs found: Not reportedOther contams found description: Not reportedOther contaminants found: Not reportedOther metals cleaned: Not reportedOther metals found: Not reportedOther cleaned up: Not reportedUnknown media affected: Not reportedNo media affected: Not reportedLead cleaned up: YLead contaminant found: Not reportedGroundwater cleaned: Not reportedGroundwater affected: Not reportedDrinking water cleaned: Not reportedDrinking water affected: Not reportedControled substance cleaned: Not reportedControled substance found: Not reportedAsbestos cleaned: YAsbestos found: Not reportedAir cleaned: Not reportedAir contaminated: Not reportedState/tribal NFA date: Not reportedState/tribal program ID: Not reportedState/tribal program date: Not reportedIC in place: Not reportedIC in place date: Not reportedIC cat. enforcement permit tools: Not reportedIC cat. gov. controls: Not reportedIC cat. info. devices: Not reportedIC Category proprietary controls: NInstitutional controls required: YesPhoto available: NoVideo available: YesCleanup required: NDid owner change: City of AnaheimCurrent owner: GovernmentOwnership entity: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued)1014349499 TC4901213.2s Page 206 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 56.3%% Vacant Housing: 125# Vacant Housing: 20.1%% Unemployed: 350# Unemployed: 5162Meidan Income: 2.9%% Low Income: 2397# Low Income: 8.1%% Below Poverty: 874# Below Poverty: Not reportedRedev Completition Date: Not reportedIC Data Address: Not reportedHighlights: Not reportedPast Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown media cleaned up: Not reportedIndoor air media cleaned up: Not reportedBuilding material media cleaned up: Not reportedMedia affected indoor air: Not reportedMedia affected Bluiding Material: Not reportedFuture Use: Multistory Not reportedUnknown contaminant found: Not reportedSVOCs contaminant found: Not reportedSelenium contaminant found: Not reportedPesticides contaminant found: Not reportedNo contaminant found: Not reportedNickel contaminant found: Not reportedMercury contaminant found: Not reportedIron contaminant found: Not reportedCopper contaminant found: Not reportedChromium contaminant found: Not reportedCadmium contaminant found: Not reportedArsenic contaminant found: Not reportedUnknown clean up: Not reportedSVOCs cleaned up: Not reportedSelenium cleaned up: Not reportedPesticides cleaned up: Not reportedNo clean up: Not reportednickel cleaned up: Not reportedmercury cleaned up: Not reportedIron cleaned up: Not reportedCopper cleaned up: Not reportedChromium cleaned up: Not reportedCadmium cleaned up: Not reportedArsenic cleaned up: NSuperfund Fed. landowner flag: Not reportedGreenspace acreage and type: Not reportedFuture use industrial acreage: ROSS PARK EXPANSION (Continued) 1014349499 Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2016 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster U 0.382 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 West HIST CORTESE1771 N/A U124 LUSTFIRST STATE BANK PROP.S104405116 TC4901213.2s Page 207 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeCounty: 8Region: TO THE SOUTH. REFERED TO RB 6/29/99 EXCAVATED SOIL IN DIESEL DISPENSER AREA. 6/97 3 WELLS INSTALLED, FLOW DIRECTION 10/96 - GW 50 FT.BGS. BENZENE MAX 250 PPB AND MTBE MAX. 220 PPB. 4/96Summary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: NOMStaff: Not reportedMTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 1MTBE Concentration: 220Max MTBE GW: 4/15/1996MTBE Date: -117.9589813Longitude: 33.8035627Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: =GW Qualifies: 10/1/1992Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 11/1/2000Date Remedial Action Underway: 7/27/2000Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 9/9/1997Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 7/1/2003Close Date: 1/1/1965Enforcement Date: 2/26/1992Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/1/1992Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900429Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: EDVEAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000537TCase Number: FIRST STATE BANK PROP. (Continued)S104405116 TC4901213.2s Page 208 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: NoWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 1340Max MTBE Soil: 1MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9446167Longitude: 33.83295245Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 11/4/1999Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 10/18/1999Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/22/2001Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/29/1999Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 9/29/1999Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 11/4/1999Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902332Global ID: TankLeak Source: Other CauseLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: EUCLIDCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003570TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: FIRST STATE BANK PROP. (Continued)S104405116 TC4901213.2s Page 209 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083003570TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083000537TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: FIRST STATE BANK PROP. (Continued) S104405116 Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 08/01/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13300344.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13294486.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13288891.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0900136Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD982359515EPA ID: 900136Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: 2038 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster U 0.386 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 West 1773 W LINCOLN AVE #1 CAD982359515 U125 SEMS-ARCHIVEDURAN CO 1003877997 TC4901213.2s Page 210 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE CERCLA GRANT SITEComments: 06/08/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: EVIDENCE OF ON-SITE DISP. PRELIM ASSESS DONE ONLY WASTE IS RINSE WTR. - NOW RECINCU- LATED, NOComments: 01/29/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.Comments: 01/19/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30270003Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: * CONTAMINATED SOIL * UNSPECIFIED SLUDGE WASTEPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9441Longitude: 33.83222Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 02/28/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30270003Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2038 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster U 0.386 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 124 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 West 1773 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE #1 N/A U126 ENVIROSTORDURAN COMPANY S101481412 TC4901213.2s Page 211 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: DURAN COMPANY (Continued)S101481412 Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9313179Longitude: 33.8276394Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 3/19/1999Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 5/11/1999Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/20/2001Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 8/15/1998Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 8/15/1998Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 3/19/1999Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902245Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003368TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2098 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster T 0.397 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92815 SE HIST CORTESE1436 SANTA ANA ST N/A T127 LUSTAL ROHRS AND SONS S105003899 TC4901213.2s Page 212 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083003368TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: AL ROHRS AND SONS (Continued)S105003899 Not reportedGW Qualifies: 5/20/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 9/17/1986Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 5/20/1987Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900348Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: CRESCENTCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000435TCase Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2143 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster V 0.406 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW CA FID UST1750 PENHALL WAY N/A V128 LUSTU S SPRINT S101588949 TC4901213.2s Page 213 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083000435TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 901 E 104TH STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7145209698Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30000544Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: TMEStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9454045Longitude: 33.8350912Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: U S SPRINT (Continued)S101588949 TC4901213.2s Page 214 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605900348Global Id: 08/07/2006Status Date: Open - InactiveStatus: T0605900348Global Id: 09/17/1986Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900348Global Id: 08/27/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900348Global Id: Status History: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900348Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900348Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000435TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 03/14/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9454045Longitude: 33.8350912Latitude: T0605900348Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2143 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster V 0.406 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 126 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW 1750 W PENHALL WAY N/A V129 LUSTU.S. SPRINT S109284219 TC4901213.2s Page 215 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff LetterAction: 10/31/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: LOP Case Closure Summary to RBAction: 01/25/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: File reviewAction: 01/23/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: File reviewAction: 04/23/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 08/27/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 04/01/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 03/14/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/10/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900348Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 03/14/2013Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900348Global Id: 03/05/2012Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900348Global Id: 03/27/2009Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: U.S. SPRINT (Continued)S109284219 TC4901213.2s Page 216 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 10/12/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901267Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/27/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901267Global Id: 10/12/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901267Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901267Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901267Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT228LOC Case Number: 083001681TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/27/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9311252Longitude: 33.8266292Latitude: T0605901267Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2162 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster W 0.409 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE HIST UST549 CENTRAL PARK N/A W130 LUSTYUKI TRUCKING U001578627 TC4901213.2s Page 217 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001681TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 10Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 002Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00007500Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 001Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92802Owner City,St,Zip: 549 W. CENTRAL PARK AVENUEOwner Address: YUKI TRUCKING, INC.Owner Name: 7147798214Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000008322Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/12/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901267Global Id: YUKI TRUCKING (Continued)U001578627 Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.941685Longitude: 33.836731Latitude: T0605968412Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2191 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster V 0.415 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 127 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW 333 EUCLID N/A V131 LUSTROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO S105695853 TC4901213.2s Page 218 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: HydrocarbonsSubstance: UndefinedCase Type: 85UT021Local Case Num: Not reportedCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 03/18/1985Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605968412Global Id: 03/18/1985Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605968412Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: RIVERSIDECity: Not reportedAddress: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NONEContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605968412Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605968412Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 85UT021LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 03/18/1985Status Date: ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO (Continued) S105695853 TC4901213.2s Page 219 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: Not reportedStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/18/1985Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605968412Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO (Continued) S105695853 GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT228Local Case Num: 083001681TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2191 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster W 0.415 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE 549 CENTRAL PARK N/A W132 LUSTYUKI TRUCKING S105033085 TC4901213.2s Page 220 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9320729Longitude: 33.8265344Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/27/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/12/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901267Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: YUKI TRUCKING (Continued)S105033085 TC4901213.2s Page 221 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NPDES: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 09/21/2016Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 12/20/2016Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002426Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9318Longitude: 33.82667Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Violeta MislangProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0.5Acres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 09/21/2016Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60002426Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2205 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster W 0.418 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE NPDES528 S. CENTRAL PARK WEST N/A W133 ENVIROSTORLINCO INDUSTRIES, INC.S109448598 TC4901213.2s Page 222 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-635-2800EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: dcshelly@att.netOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-635-2800OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: General ManagerOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Dean ShellyOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92802OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnahiemOPERATOR CITY: 528 S Central Park Ave WOPERATOR ADDRESS: Linco Industries IncOPERATOR NAME: dcshelly@att.netFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-635-2800FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: General ManagerFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Dean ShellyFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 16000PLACE SIZE: 8/23/2006STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 8/23/2006PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I020427WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 308099Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: LINCO INDUSTRIES, INC. (Continued)S109448598 TC4901213.2s Page 223 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92802Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnahiemDischarge City: 528 S Central Park Ave WDischarge Address: Linco Industries IncDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 08/23/2006Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I020427WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 308099Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3479-Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services, NECPRIMARY SIC: 29-JUN-15CERTIFICATION DATE: GENERAL MANAGERCERTIFIER TITLE: DEAN SHELLYCERTIFIER NAME: Bolsa Chica ChannelRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: LINCO INDUSTRIES, INC. (Continued)S109448598 TC4901213.2s Page 224 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: LINCO INDUSTRIES, INC. (Continued) S109448598 Local AgencyFile Location: 87UT044LOC Case Number: 083000476TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 05/20/1988Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9317889Longitude: 33.8267534Latitude: T0605900382Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2207 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster W 0.418 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE HIST CORTESE528 CENTRAL PARK AVENUE N/A W134 LUSTBUD’S DELIVERY SERVICE S105022497 TC4901213.2s Page 225 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900382Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: UndefinedCase Type: 87UT044Local Case Num: 083000476TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 05/20/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900382Global Id: 05/20/1988Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900382Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900382Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900382Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affect: BUD’S DELIVERY SERVICE (Continued) S105022497 TC4901213.2s Page 226 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083000476TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9317889Longitude: 33.8267534Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/20/1988Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: BUD’S DELIVERY SERVICE (Continued) S105022497 0901393Site ID: :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFederal Facility: CAD048768931EPA ID: 901393Site ID: SEMS-ARCHIVE: 2272 ft.ECHO 0.430 mi.HAZNET Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDSANAHEIM, CA 92802 SE RCRA NonGen / NLR512 E CENTRAL PK AVE CAD048768931 135 SEMS-ARCHIVEJ-TRON INC 1000367604 TC4901213.2s Page 227 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: SEDONA, AZ 86336 71 JUNIPER LNOwner/operator address: TILLIE JONESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (928) 634-0254Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: RICHARD SANCHEZContact: COTTONWOOD, AZ 86326 4450 E MUSTANG DRMailing address: CAD048768931EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 512 E CENTRAL PK AVEFacility address: J-TRON INCFacility name: 02/04/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Not reportedPriority Level: 01/01/81Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 08/01/85Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 08/01/85Date Completed: 02/01/85Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: 13004003.00000Person ID: 13300040.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13294182.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13288587.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: J-TRON INC (Continued)1000367604 TC4901213.2s Page 228 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110002647477Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J-TRON INCSite name: 06/03/1991Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J-TRON INCSite name: 02/11/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J-TRON INCSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: J-TRON INCSite name: 02/06/2002Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/13/1979Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: RICHARD SANCHEZOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1974Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: J-TRON INC (Continued)1000367604 TC4901213.2s Page 229 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 512 E CENTRAL PARK AVE SMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: CHARLES R. SANCHEZ-VPContact: CAD048768931GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000367604envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 6.67Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified aqueous solutionWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 512 E CENTRAL PARK AVE SMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: CHARLES R. SANCHEZ-VPContact: CAD048768931GEPAID: 2003Year: 1000367604envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 6.25Tons: Invalid CodeDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NJD052204854TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 512 E CENTRAL PARK AVE SMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: CHARLES R. SANCHEZ-VPContact: CAD048768931GEPAID: 2003Year: 1000367604envid: HAZNET: HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System J-TRON INC (Continued)1000367604 TC4901213.2s Page 230 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002647477DFR URL: 110002647477Registry ID: 1000367604Envid: ECHO: 14 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 4.17Tons: Invalid CodeDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NJD062204864TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 512 E CENTRAL PARK AVE SMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: CHARLES R. SANCHEZ-VPContact: CAD048768931GEPAID: 2000Year: 1000367604envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 7.08Tons: Invalid CodeDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NJD052204854TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 512 E CENTRAL PARK AVE SMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: CHARLES R. SANCHEZ-VPContact: CAD048768931GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000367604envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 3.33Tons: Invalid CodeDisposal Method: Liquids with pH <= 2 with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NJD052204854TSD EPA ID: J-TRON INC (Continued)1000367604 TC4901213.2s Page 231 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605900957Global Id: 12/11/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 01/07/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 12/11/1992Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900957Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900957Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900957Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001233TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 12/27/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.928926Longitude: 33.8291929Latitude: T0605900957Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2421 ft. 0.459 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 135 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 ESE HIST CORTESE1200 BROADWAY N/A 136 LUSTGOODYEAR TIRE S101299259 TC4901213.2s Page 232 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 12/27/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 11/06/1995Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 12/27/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: ExcavationAction: 06/01/1995Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/07/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment WorkplanAction: 12/27/1994Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 02/21/1995Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900957Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/27/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 04/03/1995Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 02/27/1995Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 02/21/1995Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900957Global Id: 12/27/1994Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: GOODYEAR TIRE (Continued)S101299259 TC4901213.2s Page 233 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605901318Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 05/26/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901318Global Id: 06/09/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901318Global Id: 06/09/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901318Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901318Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901318Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001752TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 05/26/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.928926Longitude: 33.8291929Latitude: T0605901318Global Id: STATERegion: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/11/1992Date: GOODYEAR TIRE (Continued)S101299259 TC4901213.2s Page 234 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 1/19/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/26/1992Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/20/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 6/9/1989Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 1/19/1991Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901318Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Subsurface MonitoringHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001752TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/20/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901318Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/26/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901318Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/26/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901318Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 02/08/1991Date: OtherAction Type: GOODYEAR TIRE (Continued)S101299259 TC4901213.2s Page 235 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083001752TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: ACQUISITION PROCESS 12/21/92. CASE REOPENED 1/7/93. PREVIOUSLY CLSD 5/26/92. CALTRANS FOUND SOIL CONT. DURINGSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: NOMStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.928726Longitude: 33.82962761Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: GOODYEAR TIRE (Continued)S101299259 hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (713) 241-5036Contact telephone: USContact country: HOUSTON, TX 772522648 P O BOX 2648Contact address: SONDRA BIENVENUContact: HOUSTON, TX 772522648 P O BOX 2648Mailing address: CAR000119479EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 S A P 120514 1131 W LINCOLNFacility address: TEXACO SERVICE STATIONFacility name: 06/07/2002Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: ECHO 2627 ft.HAZNETSite 1 of 2 in cluster X 0.498 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST USTANAHEIM, CA 92805 East LUST1131 W LINCOLN CAR000119479 X137 RCRA-SQGTEXACO SERVICE STATION 1006804996 TC4901213.2s Page 236 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000405TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 04/18/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9270319Longitude: 33.8326953Latitude: T0605900323Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (713) 241-5036Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77252 P O BOX 2648Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENT LLC DBA S O P USOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1006804996 TC4901213.2s Page 237 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 12/08/2005Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 05/26/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 08/04/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 05/23/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 03/21/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 10/31/2002Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 10/14/1986Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 07/07/1986Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900323Global Id: 07/07/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900323Global Id: Status History: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900323Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900323Global Id: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1006804996 TC4901213.2s Page 238 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110013310835Registry ID: FINDS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002E97E.pdfURL: 0002E97EFile Number: HIST UST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/12/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900323Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 10/09/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900323Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/18/2006Status Date: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1006804996 TC4901213.2s Page 239 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110013310835DFR URL: 110013310835Registry ID: 1006804996Envid: ECHO: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 12Tons: Disposal, OtherDisposal Method: Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD982484933TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: Houston, TX 770672508Mailing City,St,Zip: 12700 NORTHBOROUGH DRIVE MFT 240-GMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 2818742224Telephone: N CORTEZ/ENVT’L DATA ANALYSTContact: CAR000119479GEPAID: 2002Year: 1006804996envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 3.12Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: Houston, TX 770672508Mailing City,St,Zip: 12700 NORTHBOROUGH DRIVE MFT 240-GMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 2818742224Telephone: N CORTEZ/ENVT’L DATA ANALYSTContact: CAR000119479GEPAID: 2002Year: 1006804996envid: HAZNET: STATE MASTER HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1006804996 TC4901213.2s Page 240 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: SWStaff Initials: TMEStaff: CMTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 11Max MTBE Soil: 4MTBE Concentration: 1.2Max MTBE GW: 12/17/2003MTBE Date: -117.9270319Longitude: 33.8326953Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: =GW Qualifies: 5/20/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 8/4/2003Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 10/14/1986Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 7/7/1986Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 5/20/1987Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900323Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: WESTCross Street: Vapor ExtractionAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000405TCase Number: Remedial action (cleanup) UnderwayFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 2627 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster X 0.498 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 142 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 East 1131 LINCOLN AVE N/A X138 LUSTTEXACO SERVICE STATION S101299302 TC4901213.2s Page 241 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) S101299302 04/10/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 08/16/2002Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605907715Global Id: Status History: 9517824903Phone Number: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605907715Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605907715Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Diesel, GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003956TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: 07/29/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.941572Longitude: 33.839258Latitude: T0605907715Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2628 ft. 0.498 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 133 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NNW 556 EUCLID N. N/A 139 LUSTANAHEIM PLAZA S105774282 TC4901213.2s Page 242 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605907715Global Id: 09/27/2007Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 08/27/2007Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 10/31/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 03/20/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 08/23/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 05/18/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 11/01/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 05/01/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 04/27/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 02/12/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 08/18/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 07/31/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 06/25/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 05/30/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605907715Global Id: ANAHEIM PLAZA (Continued)S105774282 TC4901213.2s Page 243 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/29/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 11/01/2005Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: File Review - ClosureAction: 05/05/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/31/2003Date: OtherAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 09/22/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 08/16/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 08/16/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605907715Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 07/29/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 03/27/2009Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 03/26/2009Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 06/03/2008Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 02/14/2008Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605907715Global Id: 12/06/2007Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: ANAHEIM PLAZA (Continued)S105774282 TC4901213.2s Page 244 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: RMStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 4/10/2003Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 8/16/2002Discover Date: 8/18/2003Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 8/16/2002How Stopped Date: T0605907715Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: SASHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: CRESCENTCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: O, SCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003956TCase Number: Preliminary site assessment underwayFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: ANAHEIM PLAZA (Continued)S105774282 TC4901213.2s Page 245 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: ANAHEIM PLAZA (Continued)S105774282 Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003492Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAT000613372Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9479Longitude: 33.83463Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1Acres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/10/2015Status Date: Refer: Local AgencyStatus: 71003492Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2831 ft. 0.536 mi.NPDES Relative: Lower Actual: 123 ft. 1/2-1 Orange Co. Industrial SiteANAHEIM, CA 92801 WNW SLIC223 N. CRESCENT WAY N/A 140 ENVIROSTORKCA ELECTRONICS, INC.S110169034 TC4901213.2s Page 246 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 714-780-1234FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Johnny VillagranaFACILITY CONTACT NAME: AcresPLACE SIZE UNIT: 2PLACE SIZE: 12/15/1992STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 12/15/1992PROCESSED DATE: 5/9/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I009568WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 208684Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: ETCHANT / STRIPPERReleased Chemical: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure typeClosure Type: CLOSED 5/20/1992Current Status: RO0000355Record ID: 92IC010Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Chlorinated HydrocarbonsPotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supply, Soil, Soil VaporPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: RSCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.947952Longitude: 33.8346329Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: T10000001873Global Id: 04/12/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: KCA ELECTRONICS, INC. (Continued)S110169034 TC4901213.2s Page 247 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8 30I009568WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 208684Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3672-Printed Circuit BoardsPRIMARY SIC: 16-JUL-15CERTIFICATION DATE: EHS ManagerCERTIFIER TITLE: Johnny VillagranaCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-780-1234EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: johnnyv@kcamerica.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-780-1234OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Johnny VillagranaOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92801OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnaheimOPERATOR CITY: 223 N Crescent WayOPERATOR ADDRESS: KCA ElectronicsOPERATOR NAME: johnnyv@kcamerica.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: KCA ELECTRONICS, INC. (Continued)S110169034 TC4901213.2s Page 248 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92801Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnaheimDischarge City: 223 N Crescent WayDischarge Address: KCA ElectronicsDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 12/15/1992Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: KCA ELECTRONICS, INC. (Continued)S110169034 TC4901213.2s Page 249 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: KCA ELECTRONICS, INC. (Continued) S110169034 PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820008Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404427Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021658295Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SD-MASTER AGREEMENTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 31001-NO 31001-NOConfirmed COC: Under Investigation Under InvestigationPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9488Longitude: 33.83774Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 65Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404427Site Code: 08/15/2005Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 30820008Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: WDS HIST CORTESE 3317 ft.CA FID UST 0.628 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 125 ft. 1/2-1 SCHANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW LUST501 CRESCENT WAY N/A 141 ENVIROSTORANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 250 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/11/1998Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 8/25/1998Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/23/1999Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 6/15/1998Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 6/23/1998Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/11/1998Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902178Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003212TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: School District. The Agreement was fully executed on March 13, 2003. preparation of the Master Oversight Agreement for Anaheim Union High This site code was set up only to cover activities involved in theComments: 11/10/2011Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: oversight of PEAs and other remedial activities if necessary. DTSC entered into a Master Oversight Agreement with AUHSD for theComments: 02/10/2003Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued)S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 251 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SD-MASTER AGREEMENTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 31001-NO, , 31001-NOConfirmed COC: Under InvestigationPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9488Longitude: 33.83774Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/15/2005Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 29Senate: 65Assembly: 404427Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30820008Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: TMEStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 134Max MTBE Soil: 1MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9124788Longitude: 33.8490751Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued)S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 252 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016627Board Of Equalization: 6Number: 7763Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 11-23-92Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007763-000001SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-09-94Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016627Board Of Equalization: 6Number: 7763Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: School District. The Agreement was fully executed on March 13, 2003. preparation of the Master Oversight Agreement for Anaheim Union High This site code was set up only to cover activities involved in theComments: 11/10/2011Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: oversight of PEAs and other remedial activities if necessary. DTSC entered into a Master Oversight Agreement with AUHSD for theComments: 02/10/2003Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820008Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404427Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021658295Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued) S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 253 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007763-000012SWRCB Tank Id: 1413Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-09-94Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016627Board Of Equalization: 6Number: 7763Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-23-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007763-000004SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-09-94Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016627Board Of Equalization: 6Number: 7763Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-23-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007763-000003SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-09-94Action Date: 10-28-92Referral Date: 44-016627Board Of Equalization: 6Number: 7763Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 11-23-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-007763-000002SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-09-94Action Date: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued)S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 254 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I017973Facility ID: WDS: 083002786TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083003476TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083003212TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083002988TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92801Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 501 CRESCENT WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149993581Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30001741Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: JET FUELContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued) S101589149 TC4901213.2s Page 255 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: sanitary districts, water districts irrigation districts, etc.) Special District (Includes districts established under general acts,Agency Type: 7149993540Agency Telephone: JOHN JESSIEAgency Contact: ANAHEIM 92704Agency City,St,Zip: 501 CRESCENT WAYAgency Address: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTAgency Name: JOHN JESSIEFacility Contact: 7149993540Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (Continued) S101589149 Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1.7Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School CleanupSite Type: 404904Site Code: 07/05/2016Status Date: Inactive - Action RequiredStatus: 60002105Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3973 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster Y 0.752 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 East SCH903-925 W. LINCOLN AVE. & 109 N. OHIO ST. N/A Y142 ENVIROSTORTAORMINA FAMILY / CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPERTIES S117038743 TC4901213.2s Page 256 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation mailed to BP on 09/16/15 Scarlett Zhai. Annual Cost Estimate FY 15/16 letter emailed and DTSC cost estimated was conducted on 9/11/2015 by Shahir Haddad andComments: 09/16/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC concurred the PEA is adequate for public comment.Comments: 06/09/2015Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/06/2015Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/29/2014Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/24/2014Completed Date: Environmental Oversight Agreement ApplicationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002105Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404904Alias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: LeadConfirmed COC: Naphthalene Pyrene Toluene Xylenes Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Chrysene risk, e.g. Aroclor 1254 Acenaphthene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene mixture, low risk, e.g. Aroclor 1016 PCBs (unspeciated mixture, high biphenyls Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, see IRIS PCBs (unspeciated (beta HCH (gamma) Lindane HCH-technical Mirex Polybrominated Endosulfan Ethylbenzene Heptachlor Heptachlor epoxide HCH (alpha HCH Arsenic Benzene Lead Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs DieldrinPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREA, RETAIL - SERVICE STATIONPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9242Longitude: 33.83311Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 69Assembly: TAORMINA FAMILY / CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPERTIES (Continued) S117038743 TC4901213.2s Page 257 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NORestricted Use: 07/05/2016Status Date: Inactive - Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 29Senate: 69Assembly: 404904Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1.7Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School CleanupSite Type: 60002105Facility ID: SCH: 07/29/2017Schedule Revised Date: 03/29/2016Schedule Due Date: CEQA - Initial Study/ Mitigated Neg. Dec. (MND)Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 11/13/2017Schedule Revised Date: 09/12/2016Schedule Due Date: Removal Action Completion ReportSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 05/15/2017Schedule Revised Date: 03/14/2016Schedule Due Date: Fact SheetsSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 05/05/2017Schedule Revised Date: 03/04/2016Schedule Due Date: Community ProfileSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 05/14/2017Schedule Revised Date: 03/13/2016Schedule Due Date: Removal Action WorkplanSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Fully executed EOA sent (FedEx) to District.Comments: 10/21/2014Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: TAORMINA FAMILY / CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPERTIES (Continued)S117038743 TC4901213.2s Page 258 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Xylenes Fluorene, Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, Naphthalene, Pyrene, Toluene, Benzo[a]pyrene, Chrysene, Dibenz[ah]anthracene, Fluoranthene, Benz[a]anthracene, Benzo[b]fluoranthene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, mixture, high risk, e.g. Aroclor 1254, Acenaphthene, Anthracene, (unspeciated mixture, low risk, e.g. Aroclor 1016, PCBs (unspeciated biphenyls, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, see IRIS, PCBs HCH (beta, HCH (gamma) Lindane, HCH-technical, Mirex, Polybrominated Endosulfan, Ethylbenzene, Heptachlor, Heptachlor epoxide, HCH (alpha, Arsenic, Benzene, Lead, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Dieldrin,Potential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREA, RETAIL - SERVICE STATIONPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9242Longitude: 33.83311Latitude: School DistrictFunding: TAORMINA FAMILY / CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPERTIES (Continued) S117038743 Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820020Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404433Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HSD-ANAHEIM HSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Arsenic Lead DDE Dieldrin DDT ChlordanePotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9250Longitude: 33.83543Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 29Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404433Site Code: 05/13/2004Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 30820020Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4037 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster Y 0.765 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 East SCH811 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE N/A Y143 ENVIROSTORANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL S103950110 TC4901213.2s Page 259 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 01/14/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Draft PEA WorkplanComments: 04/11/2003Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/04/2003Completed Date: * WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/08/2004Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/18/2004Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/29/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/15/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S103950110 TC4901213.2s Page 260 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/15/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820020Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404433Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HSD-ANAHEIM HSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOLAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Arsenic, Lead, DDE, Dieldrin, DDT, ChlordanePotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9250Longitude: 33.83543Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 05/13/2004Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 29Senate: 69Assembly: 404433Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30820020Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL (Continued)S103950110 TC4901213.2s Page 261 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Phase 1Comments: 01/14/2003Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Draft PEA WorkplanComments: 04/11/2003Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/04/2003Completed Date: * WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/08/2004Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/18/2004Completed Date: Supplemental Site Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/29/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: ANAHEIM HIGH SCHOOL (Continued) S103950110 TC4901213.2s Page 262 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: DEIRMENJIAN HAGOPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CAD982042160EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1223 S EUCLIDFacility address: ANAWOOD CLEANERSFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: ECHO HAZNET 5102 ft.DRYCLEANERS 0.966 mi.FINDS Relative: Lower Actual: 118 ft. 1/2-1 Orange Co. Industrial SiteANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW ENVIROSTOR1223 S EUCLID CAD982042160 144 RCRA-SQGANAWOOD CLEANERS 1000438495 TC4901213.2s Page 263 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SB 1248 NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30720011Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: Not reportedSenate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 01/04/2001Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30720011Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/18/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ANAWOOD CLEANERSSite name: 09/16/1987Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: ANAWOOD CLEANERS (Continued)1000438495 TC4901213.2s Page 264 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation --Contact Telephone: Not reportedContact Address 2: 1223 S EUCLID STContact Address: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact Name: 0000000000Owner Telephone: Not reportedOwner Address 2: 1223 S ECULID STOwner Address: HAGOP DIRMENJIANOwner Name: Not reportedFacility Addr2: 06/30/2004Inactive Date: NoFacility Active: 03/01/1988Create Date: Power Laundries, Family and CommercialSIC Description: 7211SIC Code: Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-Operated)NAICS Description: 81232NAICS Code: CAD982042160EPA Id: DRYCLEANERS: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002786281Registry ID: FINDS: PERCHLOROETHYLENEReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 3/28/2001Current Status: RO0000040Record ID: 01IC002Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: SB 1248 Orange CountyComments: 01/04/2001Completed Date: ANAWOOD CLEANERS (Continued)1000438495 TC4901213.2s Page 265 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact: CAD982042160GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000438495envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact: CAD982042160GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000438495envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.06Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact: CAD982042160GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000438495envid: HAZNET: 4Region Code: Not reportedOwner Fax: 928020000Mailing Zip: CAMailing State: ANAHEIMMailing City: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address 1: Not reportedMailing Name: ANAWOOD CLEANERS (Continued)1000438495 TC4901213.2s Page 266 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed_facility_report?fid=110002786281DFR URL: 110002786281Registry ID: 1000438495Envid: ECHO: 17 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.77Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact: CAD982042160GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000438495envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.06Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928020000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1223 S EUCLID STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: HAGOP DEIRMENJIAN OWNERContact: CAD982042160GEPAID: 2001Year: 1000438495envid: OrangeFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: etc) Halogenated solvents (chloroforms, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene,Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: ANAWOOD CLEANERS (Continued)1000438495 TC4901213.2s Page 267 OR P H A N S U M M A R Y Ci t y ED R I D Si t e N a m e Si t e A d d r e s s Zip Database(s) Co u n t : 1 r e c o r d s . AN A H E I M S1 1 2 0 5 7 1 8 1 ME T R O P O L I T A N R E S I D E N T I A L ( P A R C E L B 40 7 - 4 2 5 S . A N A H E I M B L V D . , 1 0 0 - 92805 ENVIROSTOR, VCP TC 4 9 0 1 2 1 3 . 2 s P a g e 2 6 8 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4901213.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC4901213.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/06/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 11/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC4901213.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4901213.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska TC4901213.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 118 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4901213.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4901213.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 03/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 12/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 119 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/19/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. TC4901213.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 08/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. TC4901213.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 02/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC4901213.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/11/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC4901213.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4901213.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 02/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 127 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC4901213.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC4901213.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/01/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2016 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. TC4901213.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 07/15/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 571-373-0407 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). TC4901213.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2016 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/25/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC4901213.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. TC4901213.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 02/15/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 03/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water board?s review found that more than one-third of the region?s active disposal pits are operating without permission. TC4901213.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 01/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 06/09/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 11/21/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records TC4901213.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 10/10/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 11/10/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: TC4901213.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 11/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: TC4901213.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: TC4901213.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 01/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4901213.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/17/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 10/04/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: TC4901213.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/05/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/24/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC4901213.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 11/03/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 01/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 10/20/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 10/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 03/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4901213.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 02/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 12/21/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/03/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: TC4901213.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4901213.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2017 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 02/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list TC4901213.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/22/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4901213.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 02/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/29/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2017 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 11/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/15/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 10/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. TC4901213.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2016 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 123 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/26/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. TC4901213.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey TC4901213.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4901213.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC4901213.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5641294 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 133 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3743686.8UTM Y (Meters): 413228.3UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.937735 - 117˚ 56’ 15.85’’Longitude (West): 33.831608 - 33˚ 49’ 53.79’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ANAHEIM, CA 92802 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE 1600 WEST LINCOLN TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC4901213.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES El e v a t i o n ( f t ) El e v a t i o n ( f t ) TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 133 ft. North South West East 1 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 4 1 2 4 1 2 4 1 2 6 1 2 8 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 9 1 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 7 1 2 9 1 3 7 1 3 7 1 3 9 1 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 1 9 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 2 5 1 2 7 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 4 3 1 4 4 1 4 5 1 4 7 1 4 9 General SWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-3 Not Reported1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWB9 W1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWB8 W1/8 - 1/4 Mile SWB7 Not Reported1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWA4 SW1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWA3 SW1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNWA2 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapANAHEIM NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0133J FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0131J FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0127J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0129J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-4 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. S1/2 - 1 Mile West16 SSW1/2 - 1 Mile East11 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-5 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 4 1 3 4 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC4901213.2s Page A-7 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 50%), Lean Clay limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysilty clay loam44 inches40 inches 3 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 50%), Lean Clay limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam very fine sandy coarse sand to gravelly loamy stratified40 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: SAN EMIGDIOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-8 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reported loam very fine sandy coarse sand to gravelly loamy stratified61 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedfine sandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: SAN EMIGDIOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 7.9 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 50%), Lean Clay limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam very fine sandy coarse sand to gravelly loamy stratified61 inches44 inches 4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-9 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reported to silt loam stratified sand59 inches27 inches 2 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedfine sandy loam27 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HUENEMESoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-10 Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile SWUSGS40000138436 23 1/2 - 1 Mile NWUSGS40000138530 D18 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam to fine sandy stratified sand62 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4901213.2s Page A-11 1/2 - 1 Mile WestCAOG11000217667 4 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWCAOG11000217846 A3 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWCAOG11000217845 A2 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNECAOG11000217913 1 STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION 1/2 - 1 Mile West5116 E22 1/2 - 1 Mile West5112 E21 1/2 - 1 Mile SW5127 20 1/2 - 1 Mile NWCADW60000020980 D19 1/2 - 1 Mile SWCADW60000020988 17 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADW60000020987 15 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthCADW60000003480 C14 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthCADW60000003479 C13 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthCADW60000003478 C12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile WSWCADW60000003005 10 1/8 - 1/4 Mile ENE5128 5 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 0 160 16 0 16016 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 2 0 120 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 12 0 1 2 0 CA TC4901213.2s Page A-13 ANAHEIMArea Served: 57397Connections:292900Pop Served: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P.O. BOX 3222 (#559) Organization That Operates System: City of AnaheimSystem Name: 3010001System Number: WELL 035 - INACTIVESource Name: UndefinedPrecision:335000.0 1175600.0Source Lat/Long: Inactive UntreatedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010001028FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-17H01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 5 ENE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher 5128CA WELLS Date:02/06/1998 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:86.6 Shallow Water Depth: 74.1 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001662TA4 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54914AQUIFLOW Date:06/01/1998 Average Water Depth: 80 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:SW Site ID:083002987TA3 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54913AQUIFLOW Date:06/01/1998 Average Water Depth: 80 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:SW Site ID:083002987TA2 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54912AQUIFLOW Date:08/05/1991 Average Water Depth: 120 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001235TA1 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher 67259AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-14 CADW60000003005Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W17H001SState well numbe: 338285N1179436W001Site code: -117.9436Longitude: 33.8285Latitude: 3005Objectid: 10 WSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADW60000003005CA WELLS Date:12/13/1996 Average Water Depth: 91 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083000255TB9 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54905AQUIFLOW Date:02/1989 Average Water Depth: 113 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:W Site ID:083000787TB8 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54904AQUIFLOW Date:02/1989 Average Water Depth: 113 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:W Site ID:083000787TB7 SW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 54903AQUIFLOW Date:08/05/1997 Average Water Depth: 80 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001880TB6 WSW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 38887AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-15 C14 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000003480CA WELLS CADW60000003479Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’AMD-7/MP14’Local well name: Not ReportedState well numbe: 338229N1179374W002Site code: -117.937393Longitude: 33.822943Latitude: 3479Objectid: C13 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000003479CA WELLS CADW60000003478Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’AMD-7/MP1’Local well name: 04S10W16M004SState well numbe: 338229N1179374W001Site code: -117.937393Longitude: 33.822943Latitude: 3478Objectid: C12 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000003478CA WELLS Date:09/08/1998 Average Water Depth: 87 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:SSW Site ID:083000405T11 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 67298AQUIFLOW Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-16 OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W17J002SState well numbe: 338250N1179465W001Site code: -117.9465Longitude: 33.825Latitude: 20988Objectid: 17 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000020988CA WELLS Date:07/30/1997 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:69.42 Shallow Water Depth: 67.18 Groundwater Flow:S Site ID:083002048T16 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 38969AQUIFLOW CADW60000020987Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W17J001SState well numbe: 338234N1179433W001Site code: -117.9433Longitude: 33.8234Latitude: 20987Objectid: 15 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000020987CA WELLS CADW60000003480Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’AMD-7/MP7’Local well name: Not ReportedState well numbe: 338229N1179374W003Site code: -117.937393Longitude: 33.822943Latitude: 3480Objectid: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-17 1979-02-05 106.05 1978-11-01 113.87 1979-07-31 113.10 1979-05-02 102.86 1980-02-07 101.78 1979-11-15 108.53 1980-08-26 104.18 1980-06-10 93.03 1981-02-05 93.77 1980-10-28 102.72 1981-07-31 104.15 1981-05-06 84.04 Note: An obstruction was encountered in the well above the water surface (no water level recorded). 1981-11-04 Note: An obstruction was encountered in the well above the water surface (no water level recorded). 1981-11-07 1982-04-29 100.00 1982-01-25 96.40 1982-11-04 111.17 1982-08-04 111.12 1983-05-11 99.83 1983-02-11 99.08 1983-11-02 97.53 1983-08-18 107.13 1984-05-16 93.23 1984-02-16 78.59 1985-03-01 82.03 1984-11-14 105.88 1985-08-21 112.39 1985-05-09 96.83 1986-02-12 101.14 1985-11-05 109.12 1986-09-04 119.89 1986-05-06 106.75 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 45 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 126.10Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.9470047Longitude: 33.8380707Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070201Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W08K001SMonloc name: USGS-335017117564601Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: D18 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138530FED USGS CADW60000020988Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-18 E21 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5112CA WELLS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: GAY MUTUAL WATER COMPANY INCSystem Name: 3000513System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334930.0 1175650.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000513001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-17G01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 20 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5127CA WELLS CADW60000020980Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc: ’8-1’Basin code: OrangeCounty name: 30County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 04S10W08K001SState well numbe: 338381N1179479W001Site code: -117.9479Longitude: 33.8381Latitude: 20980Objectid: D19 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000020980CA WELLS 1974-07-02 119.80 1975-01-03 117.90 1974-08-29 121.60 1975-04-29 116.00 1975-03-18 116.80 1976-01-06 112.90 1975-10-31 124.70 1976-05-05 128.20 1976-03-09 110.10 1977-03-15 125.30 1976-10-28 136.90 1978-09-18 114.52 1977-10-31 135.10 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, continued. ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-19 Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 112.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.9497823Longitude: 33.8214043Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070201Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W17Q001SMonloc name: USGS-334917117565601Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 23 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138436FED USGS ANAHEIMArea Served: 57397Connections:292900Pop Served: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P.O. BOX 3222 (#559) Organization That Operates System: City of AnaheimSystem Name: 3010001System Number: WELL 016Source Name: UndefinedPrecision:335000.0 1175700.0Source Lat/Long: Active UntreatedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010001011FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-08N05 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: E22 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 5116CA WELLS ANAHEIMArea Served: 57397Connections:292900Pop Served: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P.O. BOX 3222 (#559) Organization That Operates System: City of AnaheimSystem Name: 3010001System Number: WELL 037 - DESTROYEDSource Name: UndefinedPrecision:335000.0 1175700.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010001030FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-07J01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-20 1970-06-29 67.30 1970-05-29 66.30 1970-08-31 71.60 1970-08-06 68.20 1970-10-29 74.00 1970-10-01 73.60 1971-03-02 69.70 1970-12-09 69.50 1971-04-29 69.80 1971-04-12 69.10 1971-07-07 73.70 1971-06-07 72.00 1971-11-01 83.20 1971-08-30 78.70 1972-02-28 73.30 1972-01-11 76.20 1972-06-29 81.20 1972-04-28 76.40 1972-10-31 102.10 1972-09-11 86.90 1973-03-01 88.00 1973-01-04 88.80 1973-07-03 94.80 1973-05-09 78.80 1973-10-31 96.20 1973-09-06 100.10 1974-03-18 89.10 1974-01-23 93.80 1974-07-08 91.30 1974-04-30 89.90 1974-10-30 92.60 1974-07-29 92.60 1975-03-18 91.20 1975-01-03 91.50 1975-06-27 92.60 1975-04-29 91.90 1975-10-31 93.10 1975-08-29 90.80 1976-05-05 97.80 1976-03-09 93.40 1977-10-31 100.40 1976-10-28 107.00 1978-11-01 95.70 1978-08-30 101.98 1979-05-02 89.23 1979-02-05 92.16 1979-11-15 87.08 1979-07-31 88.92 1980-06-10 81.28 1980-02-07 84.74 1980-10-28 82.47 1980-08-26 79.65 1981-05-06 78.53 1981-02-05 75.40 Note: An obstruction was encountered in the well above the water surface (no water level recorded). 1981-08-07 Note: An obstruction was encountered in the well above the water surface (no water level recorded). 1982-01-27 Note: The measurement was discontinued. 1982-05-17 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 57 ftWellholedepth units: 250Wellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-21 A3 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile CAOG11000217846OIL_GAS CAOG11000217845Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: Not ReportedCompletion:Not ReportedAbandonedd: 0Redrillfoo: 0Welldeptha: Not ReportedSpuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 1Wellnumber:Not ReportedLeasename: Not ReportedComments: hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde: Not ReportedElevation:SBBase meridian: 10WRange:04STownship: 17Section:Any AreaArea name: Any FieldFieldname:OrangeCounty name: Miley Petro. Corp.LtdOperator name: PWell status:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrill can:NBlm well: 05901062Api number:1District nun: A2 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile CAOG11000217845OIL_GAS CAOG11000217913Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: Not ReportedCompletion:Not ReportedAbandonedd: 0Redrillfoo: 0Welldeptha: Not ReportedSpuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 1Wellnumber:HarbesonLeasename: Not ReportedComments: hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde: Not ReportedElevation:SBBase meridian: 10WRange:04STownship: 9Section:Any AreaArea name: Any FieldFieldname:OrangeCounty name: Shell Western Exploration & Production Inc.Operator name: PWell status:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrill can:NBlm well: 05901130Api number:1District nun: 1 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile CAOG11000217913OIL_GAS Map ID Direction Distance EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-22 CAOG11000217667Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: Not ReportedCompletion:Not ReportedAbandonedd: 0Redrillfoo: 0Welldeptha: Not ReportedSpuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 48-8Wellnumber:Anaheim CommunityLeasename: Not ReportedComments: hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde: Not ReportedElevation:SBBase meridian: 10WRange:04STownship: 8Section:Any AreaArea name: Any FieldFieldname:OrangeCounty name: Amerada Petroleum CorporationOperator name: PWell status:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrill can:NBlm well: 05900855Api number:1District nun: 4 West 1/2 - 1 Mile CAOG11000217667OIL_GAS CAOG11000217846Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: Not ReportedCompletion:Not ReportedAbandonedd: 0Redrillfoo: 0Welldeptha: Not ReportedSpuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 1-AWellnumber:Not ReportedLeasename: Not ReportedComments: hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde: Not ReportedElevation:SBBase meridian: 10WRange:04STownship: 17Section:Any AreaArea name: Any FieldFieldname:OrangeCounty name: Miley Petro. Corp.LtdOperator name: PWell status:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrill can:NBlm well: 05901063Api number:1District nun: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4901213.2s Page A-23 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.763 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 30 Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 01792802 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4901213.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC4901213.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4901213.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED APPENDIX D: QUALIFICATIONS 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Ramiro Vejar Project Scientist Education Westwood College, Associate of Science in Computer Networking Technology Registrations Asbestos Building Inspector, ABIR0308160011N9319 Training Asbestos Building Inspector Initial Course DOSH #: CA-015-06 2015 Compliance Training: Hazard Communicating, Asbestos, Lead, and Mold Awareness, Chemical Inventory, Personal Protective Equipment Highlights 5 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Records Search Risk Assessment Reports Experience Summary Mr. Vejar has over 5 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry conducting Database Reviews (DR), Records Search Risk Assessment Reports (RS RA), Historical Records Review (HRR), Historical Records and Database Review (HRDR), Extended Database Search (EDS), Environmental Transaction Screen (ETS), Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESA), Asbestos Sampling and Radon Screenings and other related environmental assessments for sites including apartment buildings/complexes, commercial office buildings, shopping centers, multi-tenant commercial complexes, industrial warehouses, manufacturing facilities, gasoline service stations, and dry cleaning operations. Project Experience Santa Fe Springs Marketplace, Santa Fe Springs, California, 12-94019.1. A 100,133 SF retail center on 13.07 acres including restaurants, retail, and an active drycleaner release site with ongoing remediation. Harbor Auto Care Center, Santa Ana, California, 13-103977.1. An eleven tenant automotive repair and service center with storage of hazardous materials and generated hazardous waste. Mass Kansas, Riverside, California, 14-128096.1. A 102,742 SF fiberglass and composite manufacturing of below ground enclosures on a 14.42 acre facility. Impacted with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from historic manufacturing an industrial operations that operated from the facility since the 1940s. Park @ VNY, Van Nuys, California, 16-176577.1. A 37.34 acre historic Former Used Defense Site during World War II occupied by the United States Army between 1942 and 1946 and by the California Air National Guard between 1954 and 1989. Contact RVejar@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Debbie Stott, P.G. Nevada CEM Technical Director Education BA Geology, The Ohio State University Registrations California Professional Geologist No. 6221 Nevada Certified Environmental Manager No. 2359 Training OSHA, Hazardous Waste Operator (HAZWOPER) 40 hour Certification AHERA Certified Asbestos Inspector Certified Project Manager Highlights Over 25 years of experience in the environmental service industry with a focus on due diligence assessments Knowledgeable with ASTM, EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), and customized client formats. 100+ Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Experience Summary As Technical Director for due diligence services as part of the Investment Advisory Group, Ms. Stott focuses on report quality, client service, and sharing her years of expertise with staff and clients. Ms. Stott has performed hundreds of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Third Party Reviews, Due Diligence Audits, Record Search and Risk Assessments, Phase II and III Subsurface Investigations, Underground storage tank investigations, Remedial Investigations, Radon Studies, Mold Assessments, Methane Surveys, Indoor Air Quality Assessments, and Lead-in-water sampling and analysis. Clients have varied and have included: individual investors, City of Los Angeles Agencies, Los Angeles County, City of Anaheim, institutional investors, private and institutional equity companies, insurance companies, attorneys, brokers, developers, and multiple lenders. Project Experience Ms. Stott has conducted, managed and directed thousands of ESAs throughout her career and has been Senior Project Manager for hundreds of site investigations, characterization studies and remediation projects throughout California and the US. The following select projects summarize her experience and due diligence background: Transaction Due Diligence Project Manager, Western US and Southern California, LBA Realty. For over 16 years performed due diligence services related to real estate transfers as well as asset refinances for LBA Realty. The relationship requires close coordination and communication with property managers and representatives to provide a smooth process with client and lenders. Services have also included review of third party reports, asbestos surveys, subsurface investigations, and development of soil management plans. Many projects involved multiple locations in several states thus requiring coordination with other offices and client contacts. Debbie Stott, P.G. 2 | P a g e Environmental Lead, West Coast, Barings, LLC (Barings). Ms. Stott assists with management and review of environmental due diligence and environmental actions associated with acquisitions, property development, joint venture developments, property divestments and finance group loan transactions. Environmental due diligence includes Phase I ESAs, Phase II ESAs, indoor air quality assessments, mold assessment and mitigation planning, providing third party review, asbestos investigations, asbestos abatement, operation and maintenance plan development, remedial action development and implementation, regulatory correspondence and permitting. Phase I ESAs – multiple clients throughout US.. Ms. Stott manages and oversees preparation of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for several confidential clients. All are completed to ASTM guidelines with various special criteria specific to each client. Subsurface Investigations/Vapor Intrusion Project Manager, Whittier, CA, Confidential Client. Conducted several investigations to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion associated with contaminated groundwater into client buildings. At one location a horizontal well system was installed to passively vent vapors. Site investigations involved the installation of multiple, multi-depth vapor probes through the property to map the plume and to assist in decision making for potential further investigation. Data collected from both soil vapor and indoor air monitoring was subjected to risk assessment in order to determine if indoor air quality had been negatively impacted and engineering controls needed to protect workers. Client was able to purchase and redevelop portions of the desired parcels for use as parking. Project Manager and Environmental Lead, Berkeley, CA, LBA Realty. Evaluation of potential risks associated with the presence of trichloroethylene (TCE) and breakdown products cis 1,2- dichloroethene (cis 1,2-DCE) and vinyl chloride (VC), and methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE) in groundwater and ambient air at an existing building in Berkeley, CA. Worked with outside counsel to evaluate, summarize, and present the risks and potential risks of continued investment in the property. Remedial systems were installed under DTSC oversight, risk assessment performed and the building remodeled and reused for office space. Municipal/State Contracts Project Manager, ESAs for City of Anaheim widening of Lincoln Avenue. As a subcontractor to the geotechnical consultant, Partner provided Environmental Site Assessments for multiple properties along the project alignment. The parcel uses ranged from car wash, to older office and motel properties, automotive repair, banks, public school, and a church. Partner finished the multi-site project on time and within budget. Contact Dstott@partneresi.com 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix G Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., July 2017 Engineers who understand your business PHASE II SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 July 31, 2017 Partner Project Number: 16-177713.2 Prepared for: Development Advisors, LLC. 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com July 31, 2017 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Telephone: (949) 300-8501 Email:josh@development-advisors.com Subject: Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Partner Project Number: 16-177713.2 Dear Mr. Haskins: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the assessment performed on the above-referenced property. The following report describes the field activities, methods, and findings of the Phase II Subsurface Investigation conducted at the above-referenced property. This assessment was performed utilizing methods and procedures consistent with good commercial or customary practices designed to conform to acceptable industry standards. The independent conclusions represent Partner’s best professional judgment based upon existing conditions and the information and data available to us during the course of this assignment. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact Debra Stott at (310) 615-4500. Sincerely, Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. DRAFT DRAFT Joshua S. Cain Samantha J. Fujita, PG Staff Scientist – Subsurface Investigation Regional Manager – Subsurface Investigation DRAFT Debra Stott, PG Principal TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Limitations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 User Reliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Site Background .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Site Description ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Site History ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Geology and Hydrogeology ........................................................................................................................................ 3 3.0 Field Activities ................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Preparatory Activities...................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 Utility Clearance ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.2 Health and Safety Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Geophysical Survey ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Drilling Equipment ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Boring Locations ............................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Soil Sampling ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 3.6 Post-Sampling Activities................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.0 Laboratory Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Laboratory Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Laboratory Analytical Results ...................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2.1 Soil Sample Analytical Results ............................................................................................................................... 7 5.0 Discussion and Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Regulatory Agency Guidance ...................................................................................................................................... 8 5.2 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Summary and Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 8 ATTACHMENTS Tables 1. Summary of Investigation Scope 2. Soil Sample VOCs Figures 1. Site Plan 2. Topographic Map 3. Sample Location Map Appendices A. Boring Logs B. Geophysical Survey Report C. Laboratory Analytical Report Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the investigation was to identify the locations of on-site underground storage tanks (USTs), former tankholds, clarifiers, and/or other associated features and to investigate the potential impact of petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and/or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to soil as a consequence of a release or releases from the on-site automotive maintenance services operations. Development Advisors, LLC provided project authorization of Partner Proposal Number P16-177713.2. 1.2 Limitations This report presents a summary of work conducted by Partner. The work includes observations of site conditions encountered and the analytical results provided by an independent third party laboratory of samples collected during the course of the project. The number and location of samples were selected to provide the required information. However, it cannot be assumed that the limited available data are representative of subsurface conditions in areas not sampled. Conclusions and/or recommendations are based on the observations, laboratory analyses, and the governing regulations. Conclusions and/or recommendations beyond those stated and reported herein should not be inferred from this document. Partner warrants that the environmental consulting services contained herein were accomplished in accordance with generally-accepted practices in the environmental engineering, geology, and hydrogeology fields that existed at the time and location of work. No other warranties are implied or expressed. 1.3 User Reliance Partner was engaged by Development Advisors, LLC (the Addressee), or their authorized representative, to perform this investigation. The engagement agreement specifically states the scope and purpose of the investigation, as well as the contractual obligations and limitations of both parties. This report and the information therein, are for the exclusive use of the Addressee. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon, or used, by any other person or entity without the written consent of Partner. Third parties that obtain this report, or the information therein, shall have no rights of recourse or recovery against Partner, its officers, employees, vendors, successors or assigns. Any such unauthorized user shall be responsible to protect, indemnify and hold Partner, the Addressee and their respective officers, employees, vendors, successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) and costs attributable to such use. Unauthorized use of this report shall constitute acceptance of, and commitment to, these responsibilities, which shall be irrevocable and shall apply regardless of the cause of action or legal theory pled or asserted. This report has been completed under specific Terms and Conditions relating to scope, relying parties, limitations of liability, indemnification, dispute resolution, and other factors relevant to any reliance on this report. Any parties relying on this report do so having accepted the Terms and Conditions for which this report was completed. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 2 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND 2.1 Site Description The subject property consists of three parcels of land comprising 5.339 acres located on the southwest corner of the West Lincoln Avenue and South Loara Street intersection within a mixed residential and commercial area of Anaheim, Orange County, California. The subject property is currently developed with four single-story buildings, which were constructed in 1966. The subject property is currently occupied by Mills Collision Center, Hertz Car Sales, RV Service Solutions, and Miranda Detail for multi-tenant vehicle sales and servicing within four detached structures. On-site operations consist of automotive vehicle sales (Hertz), auto body repair, paint, and storage of associated waste paints (Mills), minor recreational vehicle service, upholstery repair, and storage (RV Service Solutions), and automotive washing and detailing (Miranda). In addition to the current structures, the subject property is also improved with asphalt-paved parking areas and associated landscaping. The subject property is bound by Lincoln Smog Checks/Auto Repair shop to the north, a tire shop and gym to the east, Loara Elementary School and commercial properties to the south, and Pampas Apartments and commercial properties to the west. Refer to Figure 1 for a site plan showing site features and surrounding properties. 2.2 Site History Partner completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) Report, dated April 28, 2017, prepared on behalf of Development Advisors, LLC. According to historical records reviewed, the subject property was formerly developed with orchards for agricultural use and two dwellings from as early as 1938. By 1965, the former dwellings had been demolished and in 1966 the property was developed with the current structures for automotive sales and servicing. According to the available historical documentation, the subject property was developed with the current structures and associated subsurface features by 1966 for automotive maintenance service, repair, auto body, and sales. During the on-site reconnaissance, Partner observed the following features capable of impacting the subsurface: approximately 26 in-ground hydraulic lifts, a compressor room with staining surrounding a floor drain, a former hazardous waste storage room (currently maintenance storage room) with stained concrete foundation surrounding a floor drain which is reportedly connected to a two-stage clarifier, automotive washing and detailing with two active floor drains reportedly connected to a single- stage clarifier, recreational vehicle washing with associated floor drains connected to a four-stage clarifier, prefabricated spray paint booths, storage of waste paints within 30-gallon drums (without secondary containment), and one recreational vehicle sanitary waste dump station which is reportedly connected to the sewer system. Based on age, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were likely used in the past in dielectric fluids and oils in a variety of equipment, including pre 1980’s hydraulic-lifting equipment. According to the EDR regulatory database listings, the subject property is listed as a UST facility and Historical UST (HIST UST) site with nine USTs. A HIST UST listing link to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) database identifies McCoy Motor Co. as operating from the subject property with a 1,000- gallon UST for unleaded fuel, one transmission oil tank, two motor oil tanks, three waste oil tanks, and two steam cleaning runoff sumps. The tank construction material, location, installation and/or removal dates, Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 3 and tank capacities of eight tanks were not reported and the current occupants were not knowledgeable about past operations. Operations began at a time of little to no regulatory oversight, as such during redevelopment activities the potential to encounter additional subsurface features cannot be completely ruled out. A Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) case dated December 5, 1989 which reportedly impacted on- site soils was listed on the regulatory database. The confirmatory soil data in the UST removal report indicated that fuel hydrocarbons did not remain once the UST, dispenser and piping were removed. The LUST was identified as a closed case cleanup site on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) online GeoTracker database dated June 20, 1990. The information indicates that this was a soil only case. According to a reviewed Facility Modification Application on file with the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency, completed by Mills Ford on November 27, 1989, one UST was to be removed with a total of six USTs to remain in place. A tank closure report for the removal of one gasoline UST was completed by Hekimian & Associates on January 10, 1990. The tank removal map dated November 27, 1989 depicted six additional USTs including one 500-gallon waste oil tank, one 1,000-gallon waste oil tank, three 550-gallon fresh oil tanks, and one 550 waste oil tank. No additional records for tank removal were available for the subject property with the Anaheim Environmental Health Agency. Partner cannot confirm the actual removal of the other USTs. According to onsite property manager, Mr. Ron Mills, a UST and dispenser was removed in the late 1980s from the subject property near the center of the parcel; however, Mr. Mills was unaware of any additional USTs. It should be noted that the City of Anaheim Fire Department did not identify the subject property as an active UST facility. The regulatory closure of the release with oversight is considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) and further assessment of the closed UST is not warranted. Based on the length of time automotive servicing and repair operations have been conducted on-site (approximately 51 years), hazardous material storage and generated waste, current staining, lack of subsurface investigations, lack of information regarding the disposition of the six other USTs at the facility, hydraulic lifts, and clarifier systems, the historical use, subsurface features, and current condition are considered a recognized environmental condition (REC). 2.3 Geology and Hydrogeology Based on a review of the United States Geological Survey (USGS)Anaheim, California Quadrangle topographic map, the subject property is situated at an elevation approximately 130 feet above mean sea level, and the local topography is sloping gently to the southwest. Refer to Figure 2 for a topographic map of the site vicinity. According to the California Geological Survey, the subject property is situated in the Peninsular Ranges which are a series of ranges separated by northwest trending valleys, subparallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The trend of topography is similar to the Coast Ranges, but the geology is more like the Sierra Nevada, with granitic rock intruding the older metamorphic rocks. The Peninsular Ranges extend into lower California and are bound on the east by the Colorado Desert. The Los Angeles Basin and the island group (Santa Catalina, Santa Barbara, and the distinctly terraced San Clemente and San Nicolas Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 4 islands), together with the surrounding continental shelf (cut by deep submarine fault troughs), are included in the province. Based on borings advanced during this investigation, the underlying subsurface consists predominantly of poorly graded sand with silt (fill material) from the ground surface to approximately 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). Refer to Appendix A for boring logs from this investigation. Groundwater was not encountered during this investigation and was not a part of the scope of work. According to the GeoTracker Website a nearby Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) site is Home Oil Company at 1422 West Broadway in the City of Martell, which is approximately 0.5 mile southeast of the subject property and is overseen by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) as Case Number 083003921T. The site maintains three groundwater monitoring wells in the area. The most recent monitoring data available on the GeoTracker Website was for February 9, 2010, with depth to groundwater ranging from 89.97 to 90.49 feet bgs with a direction of flow to the northeast. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 5 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES The scope of the Phase II Subsurface Investigation included a geophysical survey and the advancement of four borings (B1 and B7 through B9) for the collection of representative soil samples. Refer to Table 1 for a summary of the borings, sampling schedule and laboratory analyses for this investigation. 3.1 Preparatory Activities Prior to the initiation of fieldwork, Partner completed the following activities. 3.1.1 Utility Clearance Partner delineated the work area with white spray paint and notified Underground Service Alert of Southern California (USA/SC) to clear public utility lines as required by law at least 48 hours prior to drilling activities. USA/SC issued ticket number B71930362-00B for the project. 3.1.2 Health and Safety Plan Partner reviewed the site-specific Health and Safety Plan with on-site personnel involved in the project prior to the commencement of drilling activities. 3.2 Geophysical Survey On July 17, 2017, SSS conducted a geophysical survey under the supervision of Partner. The purpose of the geophysical survey was to identify clarifiers, USTs remaining in place and/or backfilled tankholds and clear boring locations of utilities. The geophysical survey was conducted with a Geonics EM-61 and a Fischer M- Scope electromagnetic induction (EM) equipment, a Schonstedt GA-52 magnetic gradiometer, a Sensors and Software Noggin ground penetrating radar (GPR) unit, and a Metrotech 9890 utility locator with line- tracing capabilities. SSS systematically free-traversed the investigation areas with the aforementioned equipment. The equipment data were interpreted in real time and compiled as necessary in order to identify subsurface anomalies consistent with USTs, disturbed soil resembling backfilled tankholds, piping trenches, utility lines, and/or other subsurface conduits/features. The geophysical survey identified seven backfilled excavations throughout the subject property. The locations of the backfilled excavations coincided with the UST locations from the UST removal permit and the Phase I. No additional excavations were noted during the survey and no metallic signatures were identified in any of the backfilled excavations, indicating that the tanks have been removed. In addition, SSS systematically free-traversed each proposed boring location with the aforementioned equipment and the equipment data were interpreted in real time for evidence of utility lines and/or other subsurface features of potential concern. Boring placement was modified as necessary based on the geophysical survey results to avoid damaging underground features. Refer to Figure 3 for a map of the backfilled excavation anomalies. Refer to Appendix B for a copy of the geophysical survey report, which provides additional details regarding the geophysical survey equipment and methodology. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 6 3.3 Drilling Equipment On July 18, 2017, Partner subcontracted with Munoz Direct Push (Munoz) to provide and operate drilling equipment. Munoz, under the direction of Partner, advanced borings B1 and B7 through B9 with a limited- access Geoprobe Model 540MT direct push rig. Sampling equipment was decontaminated between sample intervals and boring locations to prevent cross-contamination. 3.4 Boring Locations Boring B1 was advanced to the southeast of the RV clarifier on the southern portion of the property. Boring B7 was advanced to the northeast of the maintenance room clarifier on the central portion of the property. Borings B8 and B9 were advanced in the western and eastern hydraulic lift bay buildings, respectively. Refer to Figure 3 for a map indicating sample locations. 3.5 Soil Sampling Borings B1 and B7 were overlain by asphalt, which was penetrated using a punch bit attachment advanced by the direct-push drill rig. Borings B8 and B9 were overlain by concrete, which was penetrated using a concrete coring attachment advanced by the direct-push drill rig. Borings B1 and B7 were advanced to a terminal depth of 15 feet bgs. Borings B8 and B9 were advanced to a terminal depth of 12 feet bgs. Soil samples were collected using a two-foot long by 1.5-inch diameter sampler with a two-foot long acetate liner and sampling point. The sampler was advanced by the direct-push drill rig using three-foot long by 1.25-inch diameter hollow rods with the inner rods in place. At approximately one foot above the desired sampling depth, an inner rod was removed and the sampler was advanced to the desired sampling depth to allow undisturbed soil to enter the sampling liner. The sampler was retrieved from the subsurface and the soil-filled liner was removed. Each acetate liner was cut using a hacksaw or pipe-cutter. Samples were collected from the lower half of the liner using a disposable plastic syringe and retained in two sodium bisulfate-preserved volatile organics analysis (VOA) vials in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 5035 sampling protocol. The remainder of the lower half of the liner was capped on either end with Teflon tape and plastic caps. The capped liners and VOA vials were labeled for identification and stored in an iced cooler. The soil in the upper half of the liner was visually inspected for discoloration, monitored for odors, classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, placed in a sealable plastic bag, and field-screened with a photoionization detector (PID). None of the samples exhibited discoloration or an odor and none of the PID readings suggested the presence of elevated volatile organics concentrations. Soil samples were collected from borings B1 and B7 at five, 10, and 15 feet bgs and from borings B8 and B9 at four, eight, and 12 feet bgs. 3.6 Post-Sampling Activities The boreholes were backfilled with hydrated bentonite chips following sampling activities. Boreholes advanced in improved areas were capped with concrete or asphalt patch to match existing ground cover after being backfilled. No significant amounts of derived wastes were generated during this investigation. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 7 4.0 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 4.1 Laboratory Analysis Partner collected 12 soil samples on July 18, 2017, which were transported in an iced cooler under proper chain-of-custody protocol to Jones Environmental, Inc., a state-certified laboratory [California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) certificate number 6C73103] in the City of Santa Fe Springs, California, for analysis on July 19, 2017. Based on field-screening results, visual observations, and/or olfactory observations, two soil samples per clarifier boring (four soil samples total) were analyzed for carbon chain total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-cc) in accordance with EPA Method 8015M and VOCs in accordance with EPA Method 8260B and two soil samples per hydraulic lift boring (four soil samples total) were analyzed for TPH-cc in accordance with EPA Method 8015 and PCBs in accordance with EPA Method 8082. The remaining soil samples were placed on hold at the laboratory. 4.2 Laboratory Analytical Results Laboratory analytical results are included in Appendix C and discussed below. 4.2.1 Soil Sample Analytical Results None of the analyzed soil samples contained detectable concentrations of TPH-cc or PCBs above the laboratory practical quantification limits (PQLs). Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were detected in two of the analyzed soil samples (B1-5 and B7-5) at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs. The remaining VOCs were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs. Refer to Table 2 for a summary of the soil sample VOCs laboratory analysis results. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 8 5.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 5.1 Regulatory Agency Guidance Maximum Soil Screening Levels Maximum Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) are concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons that are allowed to remain in soil without potentially degrading the quality of groundwater underlying a site. Maximum SSLs are established and enforced by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). Department of Toxic Substances Control Attenuation Factor and Regional Screening Levels Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) [formerly Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs)] are generic, risk-based chemical concentrations developed by the EPA Region 9 for use in initial screening-level evaluations. RSLs combine human health toxicity values with standard exposure factors to estimate contaminant concentrations that are considered to be health protective of human exposures over a lifetime through direct-contact exposure pathways (e.g., via inhalation and/or ingestion of and/or dermal contact with impacted soil and/or indoor air). RSLs are not legally enforceable standards, but rather are considered guidelines to evaluate if potential risks associated with encountered chemical impacts may warrant further evaluation. The DTSC Office of Human and Ecological Risk (HERO) developed California-Modified RSLs based on a review of 1) the differences in methodology between PRGs and RSLs 2) RSL concentrations, and 3) recent toxicity values. 5.2 Discussion No analyzed soil samples contained concentrations of TPH-cc or PCBs above laboratory PQLs and the PQLs did not exceed the Maximum SSLs or RSLs. The detected concentrations of benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene in samples B1-5 and B7-5 were below the residential and commercial/industrial RSLs. No other VOCs were detected above laboratory PQLs and the PQLs did not exceed residential or commercial/industrial RSLs. There appears to be a de minimis release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface in the vicinity of the two older clarifiers. There does not appear to be a concern to human health or the environment at this time. Subgrade features should be removed according to state and/or local regulations upon redevelopment of the subject property. 5.3 Summary and Conclusions Partner conducted a Phase II Subsurface Investigation at the subject property to investigate the potential impact of petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs, and/or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to soil as a consequence of a release or releases from the on-site automotive maintenance services operations. The scope of the Phase II Subsurface Investigation included a geophysical survey and four soil borings. Four soil samples were analyzed for TPH-cc and two soil samples each were analyzed for VOCs and PCBs. The geophysical survey identified seven backfilled excavations throughout the subject property. The locations of the backfilled excavations coincided with the UST locations from the UST removal permit and Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report Project No. 16-177713.2 July 31, 2017 Page 9 the Phase I. No additional excavations were noted during the survey and no metallic signatures were identified in any of the backfilled excavations, indicating that the tanks have been removed. Subsurface lithology encountered in the upper 15 feet bgs consisted of fill material comprised predominately of sand with patches of silty sand. Groundwater was not encountered and was not part of the scope of work. The detected concentrations of benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene did not exceed applicable screening levels. No other VOCs, TPH-cc, or PCBs were detected above laboratory PQLs and the PQLs did not exceed the screening levels. Based on the Subsurface Investigation, there appears to be a de minimis release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface in the vicinity of the two older clarifiers. There does not appear to be a concern to human health or the environment at this time and Partner recommends no further investigation. Subgrade features should be removed according to state and/or local regulations upon redevelopment of the subject property. TABLES Table 1: Summary of Investigation Scope 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Partner Project Number 16-177713.2 July 2017 Boring Identification Location Terminal Depth (feet bgs) Matrix Sampled Sampling Depths* (feet bgs) Target Analytes B1 Southeast of RV Clarifier 15 Soil 5 ,10,15 TPH-cc, VOCs B7 Northeast of Maintenance Room Clarifier 15 Soil 5 ,10 ,15 TPH-cc, VOCs B8 Area of Western Hydraulic Lifts 12 Soil 4, 8,12 TPH-cc, PCBs B9 Area of Eastern Hydraulic Lifts 12 Soil 4, 8,12 TPH-cc, PCBs Notes: bgs = below ground surface *Depths in bold analyzed for carbon chain total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-cc) in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015. Depths in italics analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B. Underlined depths analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in accordance with EPA Method 8082. Table 2: Soil Sample VOCs Laboratory Results 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Partner Project Number 16-177713.2 July 2017 EPA Method Units Analyte Residential Soil RSL Industrial Soil RSL B1-5 B1-10 B7-5 B7-10 Benzene 1,100 5,400 1.6 <1.0 2.0 <1.0 Toluene 5,000,000 45,000,000 2.2 <1.0 2.5 <1.0 Ethylbenzene 5,400 27,000 1.9 <1.0 1.7 <1.0 Other VOCs NA NA ND ND ND ND Notes: VOCs = volatile organic compounds EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency mg/kg = micrograms per kilogram < = not detected above indicated laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) NA = not applicable ND = not detected above laboratory PQLs Values in bold exceed laboratory PQLs VOCs via 8260B (mg/kg) RSL = June 2017 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). If DTSC RSLs do not exist, June 2017 EPA Region 9 RSLs were utilized, as denoted by *. FIGURES Commercial Commercial Commercial Residential Project Number: 16-177713.2 Site Plan 1 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 J. Cain July 2017NSubject Site Approximate Scale: 1” = 140’ 0’ 140’70’70’ 35’ Commercial Commercial Elementary School 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Torrance, California 90501 Legend Figure DatePrepared By Project Number: 16-177713.2 Topographic Map 2 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 July 2017N USGS Anaheim, California Quadrangle Version: 1978 Current as of: 1981 J. Cain Figure DatePrepared By 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Torrance, California 90501 Subject Site Pampas Apartments Commercial Hertz Offices Mills Offices First Class Limousine Office/Storage Detailing Bay Hydraulic Lifts Hydraulic Lifts Spray Booth B8 B1 B9 B7 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801Project Number: 17-187549.2 Sample Location Map 3 J. Cain June 2017 N Backfilled Excavation Boring Location 0 804040 20 Clarifier Maintenance Room Clarifier RV Clarifier Legend Figure Date Approximate Scale: 1” = 80’ Prepared By 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Torrance, California 90501 APPENDIX A: BORING LOGS Date Started: 7/18/2017 Date Completed: 7/18/2017 Depth to Groundwater: NA Field Technician: J.Cain Depth PID USCS 1 2 3 4 5 1 B1-5 4.4 SM 6 7 8 9 10 1 B1-10 3.8 SP 11 12 13 14 15 1 B1-15 2.0 SP 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Boring terminated at 15 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered. Borehole backfilled with hydrated bentonite and capped with concrete after sampling. Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/3), 100 % poorly graded sand, loose, dry Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/3), 100 % poorly graded sand, loose, dry Light olive brown (2.5 Y 5/4), 80% poorly graded sand, 20 % silt, loose, dry 3-4 inches of asphalt at surface Borehole Diameter:2.25 inches Torrance, California 90501 Sample Description Notes Sampling Equipment:Acetate Sleve, VOAs 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Boring Number:B1 Page 1 of 1 Location: Southeast of RV Clarifier Site Address:1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Project Number: 16-177713.2 Drill Rig Type: Geoprobe Model M420 Limited Access drill rig Partner Engineering and Science Date Started: 7/18/2017 Date Completed: 7/18/2017 Depth to Groundwater: NA Field Technician: J.Cain Depth PID USCS 1 2 3 4 5 1 B7-5 4.1 ML 6 7 8 9 10 1 B7-10 5.2 SP 11 12 13 14 15 1 B7-15 2.3 SP 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Project Number: Drill Rig Type: Sampling Equipment: Borehole Diameter: 3-4 inches of asphalt at surface Boring terminated at 15 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered. Borehole backfilled with hydrated bentonite and capped with concrete after sampling. Light olive brown (2.5 Y 5/4) 90 % poorly graded sand, 10 % silt, loose, dry Olive Brown (2.5 Y 4/4), 90 % silt, 10 % fine sand, medium dense, dry Light brownish gray (2.5 Y 6/2) 100% poorly graded sand, loose, dry Torrance, California 90501 NotesDescriptionSample 2.25 inches 16-177713.2 Geoprobe Model M420 Limited Access drill rig Acetate Sleve, VOAs Partner Engineering and Science 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Northeast of Maintenance Room Clarifier B7 Page 1 of 1 Site Address:1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Boring Number: Location: Date Started: 7/18/2017 Date Completed: 7/18/2017 Depth to Groundwater: NA Field Technician: J.Cain Depth PID USCS 1 2 3 4 1 B8-4 3.5 ML 5 6 7 8 1 B8-8 2.8 SP 9 10 11 12 1 B8-12 2.5 SP 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Boring terminated at 12 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered. Borehole backfilled with hydrated bentonite and capped with concrete after sampling. Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/3), 100% poorly graded sand, loose, dry Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/4), 100% poorly graded sand, loose, dry Olive (5 Y 4/3), 75 % silt, 25 % clay, medium dense, moist 4-5 inches of concrete at surface Borehole Diameter:2.25 inches Torrance, California 90501 Sample Description Notes Sampling Equipment:Acetate Sleve, VOAs 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Boring Number:B8 Page 1 of 1 Location: Area of Western Hydraulic Lifts Site Address:1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Project Number: 16-177713.2 Drill Rig Type: Geoprobe Model M420 Limited Access drill rig Partner Engineering and Science Date Started: 7/18/2017 Date Completed: 7/18/2017 Depth to Groundwater: NA Field Technician: J.Cain Depth PID USCS 1 2 3 4 1 B9-4 0.1 SP 5 6 7 8 1 B9-8 0.0 SP 9 10 11 12 1 B9-12 0.0 SP 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Boring terminated at 12 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered. Borehole backfilled with hydrated bentonite and capped with concrete after sampling. Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/3), 100% poorly graded sand, loose, dry Light yellowish brown (2.5 Y 6/3), 100% poorly graded sand, loose, dry Olive gray (5 Y 4/2), 90 % poorly graded sand, 10 % silt, loose, dry 4-5 inches of concrete at surface Borehole Diameter:2.25 inches Torrance, California 90501 Sample Description Notes Sampling Equipment:Acetate Sleve, VOAs 2154 Torrance Boulevard, Suite 200 Boring Number:B9 Page 1 of 1 Location: Area of Eastern Hydraulic Lifts Site Address:1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 92801 Project Number: 16-177713.2 Drill Rig Type: Geoprobe Model M420 Limited Access drill rig Partner Engineering and Science APPENDIX B: GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT SSuubbSSuurrffaaccee SSuurrvveeyyss && AA ss ss oo cc ii aa tt ee ss ,, II nn cc .. AAnn AApppplliieedd GGeeoopphhyyssiiccaall CCoommppaannyy 2075 Corte Del Nogal, Suite W Carlsbad, CA 92011 Office: (760) 476-0492 Fax: (760) 476-0493 Subsurface Surveys & Associates, Inc. www.subsurfacesurveys.com contactus@subsurfacesurveys.com July 20, 2017 Project/Invoice No. 17-280 Partner 2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 Torrance, California 90501 Attn: Samantha Fujita Re: Geophysical Investigation Report, 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California. This report is to present the results of our geophysical survey carried out at 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California (Figure 1). The survey was performed on July 17, 2017, and its purpose was to locate and identify, twelve (12) known targets including three (3) clarifiers, two (2) hydraulic lifts, and seven (7) backfilled excavations. A secondary purpose of the survey was to detect and delineate, insofar as possible, any pipes, conduits, utilities, and other underground obstructions in the immediate vicinity of twelve (12) proposed boreholes located at or near the targets. A combination of electromagnetic induction (EM), magnetometry, and ground penetrating radar (GPR) were brought to the field in anticipation of use. Utility locators with line tracing capabilities were also used where applicable. FIGURE 1. Site location map. 2 Survey Design – The survey site was located at a limo storage and repair facility and the exact locations of the targets and twelve (12) boreholes were indicated in the field by the client. For this particular site and survey objectives, the best use of time was achieved by systematically free- traversing with the instruments while monitoring them manually, continuously, and in real-time to determine which responses were significant and due to true subsurface targets, and which were due to other non-target or above-ground features and must be ignored (an example being the nearby rebar reinforced concrete). In these situations, the free-traversing method is advantageous in that it allows for immediate detection of anomalous objects and facilitates the opportunity to investigate them further despite any obstructions and without the need to first download data. Where applicable, and depending on location, the EM devices, magnetic gradiometer, and GPR were traversed systematically over the survey areas in multiple, organized directions. Other traverses were taken for detailing and confirmation where anomalous conditions were found. In addition, the line tracers were used to impress signals onto pipes, generally through accessible risers and tracer wires when present, to delineate the lines’ locations and orientations. The instruments were also used in passive mode, configured to detect 60 Hz electrical signals and other common radio-frequency signals found in active electrical and communication lines. A Geonic’s model EM61 and a Fischer TW-6 M-Scope was used for the EM sampling. A Sensors & Software Noggin Ground Penetrating Radar unit with a 500 MHz antenna produced the radar images. The magnetic gradiometer was a Schonstedt GA-52, and a Metrotech 9890 and RIDGID SR-60 SeekTech utility locator rounded out the tools applied. Brief Description of the Geophysical Methods Applied – The EM61 instrument is a high resolution, time- domain device for detecting buried conductive objects. It consists of a powerful transmitter that generates a pulsed primary magnetic field when its coils are energized, which induces eddy currents in nearby conductive objects. The decay of the eddy currents, following the input pulse, is measured by the coils, which in turn serve as receiver coils. The decay rate is measured for two coils, mounted concentrically, one above the other. By making the measurements at a relatively long time interval (measured in milliseconds) after termination of the primary pulse, the response is nearly independent of the electrical conductivity of the ground. Thus, the instrument is a super-sensitive metal detector. Due to its unique coil arrangement, the response curve is a single well-defined positive peak directly over a buried conductive object. This facilitates quick and accurate location of targets. The M-Scope device energizes the ground by producing an alternating primary magnetic field with AC current in a transmitting coil. If conducting materials are within the area of influence of the primary field, AC eddy currents are induced to flow in the conductors. A receiving coil senses the secondary magnetic field produced by these eddy currents, and outputs the response as anomalous conditions. The strength of the secondary field is a function of the conductivity of the object, say a pipe, tank or cluster of drums, its size, and its depth and position relative to the instrument's two coils. Conductive objects, to a depth of approximately 7 feet below ground surface (bgs) for the M-Scope are sensed. The device is also somewhat focused; that is, it is more sensitive to conductors below the instrument than they are to conductors off to the side. The GPR instrument beams energy into the ground from its transducer/antenna, in the form of electromagnetic waves. A portion of this energy is reflected back to the antenna at a boundary in the 3 subsurface across which there is an electrical contrast. The instrument produces a continuous record of the reflected energy as the antenna is traversed across the ground surface. The greater the electrical contrast, the higher the amplitude of the returned energy. The radar wave travels at a velocity unique to the material properties of the ground being investigated, and when these velocities are known, the two-way travel times can be converted to depth. The depth of penetration and image resolution produced are a function of ground electrical conductivity and dielectric constant. The magnetic gradiometer has two flux gate magnetic fixed sensors that are passed closely to and over the ground. When not in close proximity to a magnetic object, that is, only in the earth's field, the instrument emits a sound signal at a low frequency. When the instrument passes over a buried iron or steel object, so that locally there is a high magnetic gradient, the frequency of the emitted sound increases. The frequency is a function of the gradient between the two sensors. The line locator is used to passively detect energized high voltage electric lines and electrical conduit (50-60 Hz), VLF signals (14-22 kHz), as well as to actively trace other utilities. Where risers are present, the utility locator transmitter can be connected directly to the object, and a signal (9.8-82 kHz) is sent traveling along the conductor, pipe, conduit, etc. In the absence of a riser, the transmitter can be used to impress an input signal on the utility by induction. In either case, the receiver unit is tuned to the input signal, and is used to actively trace the signal along the pipe’s surface projection. Interpretation and Conclusions - The interpretation took place in real time as the survey progressed, and accordingly, the findings of our investigation were marked on the ground cover at the site using spray chalk, reported to the client, and are further documented with site photographs of all targets and borehole locations (Figures 2-14). Items detected in the vicinity of the boreholes and targets were marked in coordinated standard colors including red for electric, yellow vent and product lines, green for sewer and drain, blue for water, and white for lines of unknown utility type or hydraulic lift control lines. Additionally orange was used to mark out the extent of the target backfilled excavations (Figures 3-8, 12), yellow was used to mark out a shallow soil disturbance (Figure 13), white was used to mark out the boundaries of target hydraulic lift bases (Figures 9, 11), and green was used to mark out the extent of the target clarifiers (Figures 2, 8, 14). Please review the site photographs for the locations and orientations of all items found within the vicinity of the boreholes and targets. At the conclusion of the survey, all boreholes were positioned in order to provide adequate clearance from detected obstructions. In their final locations, they were marked in white with a yellow “SSS” to indicate that each had been checked by company personnel. Limitations and Further Recommendations - It should be understood that limitations inherent in geophysical instruments and/or surveying techniques exist at all sites, and nearly all sites exhibit conditions under which such might not perform optimally. Consequently, the detection of buried objects in all circumstances cannot be guaranteed. Such limitations are numerous and include, but are not limited to, rebar-reinforced ground cover, abrupt changes in ground cover type, above-ground obstacles preventing full traverses or traverses in one direction only, above-ground conductive objects interfering with instrument signal, nearby powerlines or EM transmitters, highly conductive background soil conditions, limited GPR penetration, non-metallic targets, shallower or larger objects shielding deeper or smaller targets, tracing signal jumping from one line to another, and inaccessible risers, cleanouts, valve boxes, and manholes. If 4 one or more geophysical instrument is rendered ineffective and cannot be utilized, the quality of the survey can be somewhat degraded. For the above reasons, and in the interest of maximum safety, we encourage our clients to take advantage of Underground Service Alert (USA), Dig Alert, or other similar services, when possible. Furthermore, we recommend hand-auguring and the use of a drilling method known as air knifing or vacuum extraction, when feasible or if applicable to this project. These methods may significantly limit damage to underground pipes, conduits, and utilities that might not have been detectable during the course of this survey. Please bear in mind, that geophysical surveying is only one of several levels of protection that is available to our clients. SubSurface Surveys may include maps in some reports. While they are an accurate general representation of the site and our findings, they are not of engineering quality (i.e., measured and mapped by a licensed land surveyor). SubSurface Surveys and Associates makes no guarantee either expressed or implied regarding the accuracy of the findings and interpretations present. And, in no event will SubSurface Surveys and Associates be liable for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages resulting from interpretations and opinions presented herewith. All data generated on this project are in confidential file in this office, and are available for review by authorized persons at any time. The opportunity to participate in this investigation is very much appreciated. Please call, if there are questions. Dustin Renck Travis Crosby Staff Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys CA State Geophysics Registration GP1044 Senior Geophysicist, SubSurface Surveys TITLE: SSS PROJECT NO: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 17-280 June 17, 2017 SITE:SURVEY DATE: PREPARED FOR: Partner Borehole Photographs Figure 7Figure 6 Figure 5Figure 4 Figure 3Figure 2 BH Backfilled Excavation BH BH Backfilled Excavation Backfilled Excavation BH ?? Backfilled Excavation BH Clarifier Backfilled Excavation BH BH Clarifier TITLE: SSS PROJECT NO: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 17-280 June 17, 2017 SITE:SURVEY DATE: PREPARED FOR: Partner Borehole Photographs Figure 13Figure 12 Figure 11Figure 10 Figure 9Figure 8 ClarifierV e nt Lin e s Backfilled Excavation BH BH Lift BH Alt BH BH Backfilled Excavation Shallow Soil Disturbance Backfilled Excavation BH Lift TITLE: SSS PROJECT NO: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California 17-280 June 17, 2017 SITE:SURVEY DATE: PREPARED FOR: Partner Borehole Photographs Figure 14 No Photo No Photo No Photo No Photo No Photo BH Clarifier APPENDIX C: LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT ANALYSES REQUESTED 1. EPA 8015M – Semivolatile Hydrocarbons as Diesel & Oil 2. EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics 3. EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Client: Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. Report date: 7/24/2017 Client Address: 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 JEL Ref. No.: ST-10930 Torrance, CA 90501 Client Ref. No: 16-177713.2 Attn: Samantha Fujita Date Sampled: 7/18/2017 Date Received: 7/19/2017 Project: West Lincoln Avenue Date Analyzed: 7/19-20,24/2017 Project Address: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Physical State: Soil Anaheim, CA 92801 1 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:B1-5 B1-10 B7-5 B7-10 B8-4 JEL ID:ST-10930-01 ST-10930-02 ST-10930-19 ST-10930-20 ST-10930-22 Carbon Chain Range Diesel Range Organics (C10-C28)ND ND ND ND ND 10.0 mg/kg Oil Range Organics (C29-C40)ND ND ND ND ND 10.0 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 1 1 1 Surrogate Recovery: Hexacosane 102%122%70%90%116% Batch ID:8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 ND = Not Detected QC Limits 30 - 120 Units Practical Quantitation Limit EPA 8015M – Semivolatile Hydrocarbons as Diesel & Oil Anaheim, CA 92801 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL Samantha Fujita Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. LABORATORY RESULTS 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 West Lincoln Avenue 2 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:B8-12 B9-4 B9-12 JEL ID:ST-10930-24 ST-10930-25 ST-10930-27 Carbon Chain Range Diesel Range Organics (C10-C28)ND ND ND 10.0 mg/kg Oil Range Organics (C29-C40)ND ND ND 10.0 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 1 Surrogate Recovery: Hexacosane 105%97%116% Batch ID:8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 8015_ 170720_01 ND = Not Detected EPA 8015M – Semivolatile Hydrocarbons as Diesel & Oil Practical Quantitation Limit Units QC Limits 30 - 120 Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 3 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:METHOD BLANK JEL ID:MB- 170720_01 Carbon Chain Range Diesel Range Organics (C10-C28)ND 10.0 mg/kg Oil Range Organics (C29-C40)ND 10.0 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 Surrogate Recovery: Hexacosane 95% Batch ID:8015_ 170720_01 ND = Not Detected Samantha Fujita JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 30 - 120 EPA 8015M – Semivolatile Hydrocarbons as Diesel & Oil Practical Quantitation Limit Units QC Limits 4 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil BATCH:Prepared:7/20/2017 Analyzed:7/20/2017 Result Spike Level Source Result % Recovery % RPD % Recovery Limits Units LCS:LCS-170720_01 SAMPLE SPIKED:CLEAN SOIL Analyte: Diesel 615 600 ND 103%60 - 140 mg/kg Surrogate Recovery: Hexacosane 105%30 - 120 LCSD:LCSD-170720_01 SAMPLE SPIKED:CLEAN SOIL Analyte: Diesel 622 600 ND 104%1.1%60 - 140 mg/kg Hexacosane 112%30 - 120 LCS = Laboratory Control Sample RPD = Relative Percent Difference 8015_170720_01 EPA 8015M – Semivolatile Hydrocarbons as Diesel & Oil Surrogate Recoveries: Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 5 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/19/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:B1-5 B1-10 B7-5 B7-10 JEL ID:ST-10930-01 ST-10930-02 ST-10930-19 ST-10930-20 Analytes: Benzene 1.6 ND 2.0 ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromodichloromethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromoform ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg n-Butylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg sec-Butylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg tert-Butylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Carbon tetrachloride ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Chlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Chloroform ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 2-Chlorotoluene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 4-Chlorotoluene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dibromochloromethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dibromomethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Samantha Fujita Anaheim, CA 92801 West Lincoln Avenue Torrance, CA 90501 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Practical Quantitation Limit EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics Units JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 6 of 23 Sample ID:B1-5 B1-10 B7-5 B7-10 JEL ID:ST-10930-01 ST-10930-02 ST-10930-19 ST-10930-20 Analytes: cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Ethylbenzene 1.9 ND 1.7 ND 1.0 μg/kg Freon 113 ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Isopropylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 4-Isopropyltoluene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Methylene chloride ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Naphthalene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg n-Propylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Styrene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Tetrachloroethylene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Toluene 2.2 ND 2.5 ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Vinyl chloride ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg m,p-Xylene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg o-Xylene ND ND ND ND 1.0 μg/kg MTBE ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Ethyl-tert-butylether ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Di-isopropylether ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg tert-amylmethylether ND ND ND ND 5.0 μg/kg tert-Butylalcohol ND ND ND ND 50.0 μg/kg Gasoline Range Organics (C4-C12)ND ND ND ND 0.20 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 1 1 Surrogate Recoveries: Dibromofluoromethane 110%120%120%124% Toluene-d₈105%107%107%107% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106%113%111%108% VOC4-071917- CHECKS VOC4-071917- CHECKS VOC4-071917- CHECKS VOC4-071917- CHECKS ND= Not Detected JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS 60 - 140 Practical Quantitation Limit Units EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics 60 - 140 QC Limits 60 - 140 7 of 23 Client: Report date:7/20/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/19/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:B8-4 B8-12 B9-4 B9-12 JEL ID:ST-10930-22 ST-10930-24 ST-10930-25 ST-10930-27 Analytes: Gasoline Range Organics (C4-C12)ND ND ND ND 0.20 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 1 1 Surrogate Recoveries: Dibromofluoromethane 103%107%107%109% Toluene-d₈99%103%103%101% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 112%115%112%115% VOC1-072417- CHECKS VOC1-072417- CHECKS VOC1-072417- CHECKS VOC1-072417- CHECKS ND= Not Detected JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 Practical Quantitation Limit Units Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics QC Limits 60 - 140 60 - 140 60 - 140 8 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/19/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:METHOD BLANK 072417- V1MB1 JEL ID:071917- V4MB1 072417- V1MB1 Analytes: Benzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromodichloromethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Bromoform ND ND 1.0 μg/kg n-Butylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg sec-Butylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg tert-Butylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Carbon tetrachloride ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Chlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Chloroform ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 2-Chlorotoluene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 4-Chlorotoluene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dibromochloromethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dibromomethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2- Dichlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ND 5.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3-Dichloropropane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 2,2-Dichloropropane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1-Dichloropropene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Practical Quantitation Limit Units Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 9 of 23 Sample ID:METHOD BLANK 072417- V1MB1 JEL ID:071917- V4MB1 072417- V1MB1 Analytes: cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Ethylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Freon 113 ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Isopropylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 4-Isopropyltoluene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Methylene chloride ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Naphthalene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg n-Propylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Styrene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Tetrachloroethylene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Toluene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Trichloroethylene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Trichlorofluoromethane ND ND 5.0 μg/kg 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg Vinyl chloride ND ND 1.0 μg/kg m,p-Xylene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg o-Xylene ND ND 1.0 μg/kg MTBE ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Ethyl-tert-butylether ND ND 5.0 μg/kg Di-isopropylether ND ND 5.0 μg/kg tert-amylmethylether ND ND 5.0 μg/kg tert-Butylalcohol ND ND 50.0 μg/kg Gasoline Range Organics (C4-C12)ND ND 0.20 mg/kg Dilution Factor 1 1 Surrogate Recoveries: Dibromofluoromethane 113%106% Toluene-d₈106%103% 4-Bromofluorobenzene 109%118% VOC4-071917- CHECKS VOC1-072417- CHECKS ND= Not Detected QC Limits 60 - 140 60 - 140 60 - 140 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics Practical Quantitation Limit Units 10 of 23 Client: 7/24/2017 Client Address:ST-10930 16-177713.2 Attn:7/18/2017 7/19/2017 Project:7/19/2017 Project Address:Soil Sample Spiked:GC#: JEL ID:071917-V4MSD1 Parameter RPD Acceptability Range (%)LCS Acceptability Range (%) Vinyl Chloride 9.6%60 - 140 94%70 - 130 1,1-Dichloroethylene 5.4%60 - 140 92%70 - 130 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.1%70 - 130 108%70 - 130 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.4%70 - 130 141%70 - 130 Benzene 1.8%70 - 130 109%70 - 130 Trichloroethylene 5.6%70 - 130 104%70 - 130 Toluene 3.3%70 - 130 104%70 - 130 Tetrachloroethene 7.0%70 - 130 107%70 - 130 Chlorobenzene 2.5%70 - 130 111%70 - 130 Ethylbenzene 4.3%70 - 130 105%70 - 130 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene 0.5%70 - 130 96%70 - 130 Gasoline Range Organics (C4-C12)2.2%70 - 130 Surrogate Recovery: Dibromofluoromethane 60 - 140 101%60 - 140 Toluene-d₈60 - 140 104%60 - 140 4-Bromofluorobenzene 60 - 140 110%60 - 140 63% 86% 94% 101% VOC4-071917-CHECKS 104% 95% 95% 81% 108%105% JEL Ref. No.: Torrance, CA 90501 Physical State: CLEAN SOIL MS Recovery (%) MSD Recovery (%) 103% 100% 100% 113% 98% Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. Report date: 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Samantha Fujita JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Client Ref. No.: EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics 071917-V4MS1 071917-V4MSD1 102% MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD = Relative Percent Difference; Acceptability range for RPD is ≤ 15% MS = Matrix Spike 108% 110% 105% 109% 104% Date Sampled: Anaheim, CA 92801 Date Received: West Lincoln Avenue Date Analyzed: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 100%94% 99%95% 57% 106% 145%139% 106% 11 of 23 Client: 7/24/2017 Client Address:ST-10930 16-177713.2 Attn:7/18/2017 7/19/2017 Project:7/19/2017 Project Address:Soil Sample Spiked:GC#: JEL ID:072417-V1LCS Parameter RPD Acceptability Range (%)LCS Acceptability Range (%) Vinyl Chloride 4.2%60 - 140 114%70 - 130 1,1-Dichloroethylene 3.3%60 - 140 97%70 - 130 Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.3%70 - 130 124%70 - 130 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.2%70 - 130 99%70 - 130 Benzene 3.5%70 - 130 103%70 - 130 Trichloroethylene 0.7%70 - 130 95%70 - 130 Toluene 5.0%70 - 130 103%70 - 130 Tetrachloroethene 1.4%70 - 130 127%70 - 130 Chlorobenzene 1.8%70 - 130 105%70 - 130 Ethylbenzene 3.4%70 - 130 108%70 - 130 1,2,4 Trimethylbenzene 2.9%70 - 130 112%70 - 130 Gasoline Range Organics (C4-C12)3.7%70 - 130 Surrogate Recovery: Dibromofluoromethane 60 - 140 91%60 - 140 Toluene-d₈60 - 140 97%60 - 140 4-Bromofluorobenzene 60 - 140 111%60 - 140 MS = Matrix Spike MSD = Matrix Spike Duplicate RPD = Relative Percent Difference; Acceptability range for RPD is ≤ 15% 92%95% 98%102% 111%111% 111%107% 113%110% 111%107% 111%105% 134%132% 108%106% 132% 111%107% 111%107% 105%104% MS Recovery (%) MSD Recovery (%) 124%119% 104%101% 134% Anaheim, CA 92801 EPA 8260B by 5035 – Volatile Organics by GC/MS + Oxygenates/Gasoline Range Organics CLEAN SOIL VOC1-072417-CHECKS 072417-V1MS 072417-V1MSD Date Received: West Lincoln Avenue Date Analyzed: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Physical State: Torrance, CA 90501 Client Ref. No.: Samantha Fujita Date Sampled: JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. Report date: 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 JEL Ref. No.: 12 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:JEL ID: Result Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Analytes: Aroclor 1016 ND 1 8082_170720_01 7/20/2017 7/20/2017 0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1221 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1232 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1242 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1248 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1262 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1268 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg TCMX 116% Decachlorobiphenyl 117% EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 30 - 120 QC Limits West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Practical Quantitation Limit Anaheim, CA 92801 B8-4 ST-10930-22 ND = Not Detected Surrogate Recoveries: 30 - 120 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Units Samantha Fujita 13 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:JEL ID: Result Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Analytes: Aroclor 1016 ND 1 8082_170720_01 7/20/2017 7/20/2017 0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1221 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1232 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1242 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1248 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1262 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1268 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg TCMX 112% Decachlorobiphenyl 111% JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD Practical Quantitation Limit Units Surrogate Recoveries:QC Limits B8-12 ST-10930-24 30 - 120 30 - 120 ND = Not Detected 14 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:JEL ID: Result Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Analytes: Aroclor 1016 ND 1 8082_170720_01 7/20/2017 7/20/2017 0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1221 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1232 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1242 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1248 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1262 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1268 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg TCMX 98% Decachlorobiphenyl 115% ND = Not Detected 30 - 120 30 - 120 EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD Practical Quantitation Limit Units Surrogate Recoveries:QC Limits West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 B9-4 ST-10930-25 Samantha Fujita JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 15 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:JEL ID: Result Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Analytes: Aroclor 1016 ND 1 8082_170720_01 7/20/2017 7/20/2017 0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1221 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1232 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1242 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1248 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1262 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1268 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg TCMX 109% Decachlorobiphenyl 113% ND = Not Detected 30 - 120 30 - 120 EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD Practical Quantitation Limit Units Surrogate Recoveries:QC Limits West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 B9-12 ST-10930-27 Samantha Fujita JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 16 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil Sample ID:JEL ID: Result Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Analytes: Aroclor 1016 ND 1 8082_170720_01 7/20/2017 7/20/2017 0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1221 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1232 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1242 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1248 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1254 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1262 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg Aroclor 1268 ND 1 """0.050 mg/kg TCMX 121% Decachlorobiphenyl 134% ND = Not Detected 30-120 30-120 EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD Practical Quantitation Limit Units Surrogate Recoveries:QC Limits Method Blank MB-170720_01 Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 JONES ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY RESULTS Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 17 of 23 Client: Report date:7/24/2017 Client Address:JEL Ref. No.:ST-10930 Client Ref. No.:16-177713.2 Attn:Date Sampled:7/18/2017 Date Received:7/19/2017 Project:Date Analyzed:7/20/2017 Project Address:Physical State:Soil BATCH:Prepared:7/20/2017 Analyzed:7/20/2017 Result Spike Level Source Result % Recovery % RPD % Recovery Limits Units LCS: Aroclor 1016 600 500 ND 120%50 - 120 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 540 500 ND 108%50 - 120 mg/kg Surrogate Recovery: TCMX 117%30 - 120 Decachlorobiphenyl 122%30 - 120 LCSD: Analytes: Aroclor 1016 590 500 ND 118%1.7%50 - 120 mg/kg Aroclor 1260 580 500 ND 116%7.1%50 - 120 mg/kg TCMX 124%30 - 120 Decachlorobiphenyl 139%30 - 120 Samantha Fujita West Lincoln Avenue JONES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CONTROL INFORMATION Partner Engineering & Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 LCS-170720_01 RPD = Relative Percent Difference 8082_170720_01 EPA 8082 by 3546 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/ECD LCSD-170720_01 Surrogate Recoveries: 18 of 23 19 of 23 20 of 23 21 of 23 22 of 23 23 of 23 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix H Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) 1600 W Lincoln Avenue, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., September 2019 P RELIMINARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC i OWNER’S CERTIFICATION PROJECT OWNER’S CERTIFICATION Permit/Application No.: OTH2018-01083 Grading Permit No.: Pending Tract/Parcel Map and Lot(s)No.: APN 250-091-09,10, & 11 Building Permit No.: Pending Address of Project Site and APN: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue APN 250-091-09, 10, & 11 This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC by FUSCOE ENGINEERING, INC. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan , including the ongoing operation and maintenance of all best management practices (BMPs), and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non-point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. OWNER: Name: Title: Company: Development Advisors, LLC Address: 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800, Anaheim CA 92806 Email: Telephone #: 949.300.8501 I understand my responsibility to implement the provisions of this WQMP including the ongoing operation and maintenance of the best management practices (BMPs) described herein. Owner Signature: Date: P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC ii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I DISCRETIONARY PERMITS AND WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS ............................ 1 SECTION II PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 3 II.1 Project Description ....................................................................................................... 3 II.2 Potential Storm Water Pollutants .................................................................................... 5 II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern ................................................................................. 6 II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics .................................................................... 8 II.5 Property Ownership/Management ................................................................................. 8 SECTION III SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 9 III.1 Physical Setting ............................................................................................................ 9 III.2 Site Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 9 III.3 Watershed Description................................................................................................ 10 SECTION IV BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) ......................................................... 13 IV.1 Project Performance Criteria........................................................................................ 13 IV.2 Site Design and Drainage Plan .................................................................................... 14 IV.2.1 Site Design BMPs ................................................................................................ 14 IV.2.2 Drainage Management Areas .............................................................................. 15 IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis ................................................... 16 IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) ....................................................................... 16 IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs .................................................................................................. 17 IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs ..................................................... 18 IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs .............................................................................................. 19 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs .......................................................................... 20 IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs ......................................................................... 20 IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs ...................................................................................... 20 IV.3.8 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs..................................................................... 22 IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs ............................................................................ 24 IV.4 Alternative Compliance Plan ....................................................................................... 25 IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits .......................................................................................... 25 IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information ............................................................... 26 SECTION V INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR BMPs ................................... 27 SECTION VI SITE PLAN AND DRAINAGE PLAN ................................................................... 35 SECTION VII EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS ............................................................................ 37 APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................... 38 P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC iii TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES Appendix A ............................................................................................... Supporting Calculations Appendix B ................................................................................. Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Appendix C .................................................................................................. Educational Materials Appendix D .................................................................. BMP Maintenance Supplement / O&M Plan Appendix E .................................................................... Conditions of Approval – Pending Issuance Appendix F ..................................................................................................... Geotechnical Report Appendix G .................................................................................... Hydromodification Calculations EXHIBITS & BMP DETAILS (INCLUDED IN SECTION VI) ▪ Vicinity Map ▪ Site Plan ▪ Preliminary WQMP Exhibit ▪ Typical Cross Sections ▪ INF-5 Drywell Fact Sheet ▪ TRT-2 Contech Stormfilter ▪ Bioclean Modular Wetlands System (PENDING) EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS (See Appendix C) ▪ The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door ▪ Household Tips ▪ Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste ▪ Recycle Waste Oil in North OC ▪ Tips for Landscaping and Gardening ▪ Responsible Pet Care ▪ Tips for Pool Maintenance ▪ Tips for Protecting your Watershed ▪ DF-1 Drainage System Maintenance ▪ R-5 Proper Pet Waste Removal ▪ R-6 Disposal of Green Waste ▪ R-8 Water Conservation ▪ SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning ▪ SD-12 Efficient Irrigation ▪ SD-13 Storm Drain Signage P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 1 DISCRETIONARY PERMITS & WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS SECTION I DISCRETIONARY PERMITS AND WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS PROJECT INFORMATION Permit/Application No.: OTH2018-01083 Grading or Building Permit No.: Pending Address of Project Site (or Tract Map and Lot Number if no address) and APN: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue APN 250-091-09, 10, & 11 WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE Discretionary Permit(s): Prefile Application # DEV2017-000128 Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance applied to this project: (Please list verbatim.) Pending – to be provided in Final WQMP CONCEPTUAL WQMP Was a Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan previously approved for this project? This report serves as the Preliminary WQMP for the project. WATERSHED-BASED PLAN CONDITIONS P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 2 DISCRETIONARY PERMITS & WATER QUALITY CONDITIONS Applicable conditions from watershed - based plans including WIHMPs and TMDLs: The Los Angeles RWQCB has adopted TMDLs for the San Gabriel River that apply to the portions of Orange County that drain to Coyote Creek: ▪ Metals (Copper, Lead, Zinc) ▪ Indicator Bacteria Section XII.D5 of the Santa Ana Region MS4 Permit (Order No. R8- 2009-0030) requires Watershed Infiltration and Hydromodification Master Plan (WIHMPs) to be developed by the County of Orange for San Diego Creek and other watersheds within the North Orange County permit area. Each WIHMP must include maps to identify areas susceptible to hydromodification, and a hydromodification tool. A Model WIHMP has been developed for the San Gabriel River / Coyote Creek Watershed, and was submitted to the Santa Ana RWQCB on May 23, 2011 (currently under review). The WIHMP includes information related to infiltration feasibility and hydromodification susceptibility at the watershed and sub-watershed scale to aid in BMP selection and design for priority projects. The information provided in the WIHMP was referenced as part of the feasibility analyses conducted for this project, and are discussed further in Section IV.3 of this WQMP. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SECTION II PROJECT DESCRIPTION II.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed 1600 W Lincoln project site encompasses approximately 5.28 acres in the City of Anaheim. The project site is bounded by Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, West Pampas Lane to the south, and Euclid Street to the west. As part of the proposed Project, an 8’ dedication/street widening along the frontage of Lincoln Avenue and a corner dedication at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue & Loara Street will be completed, totaling approximately 0.12 acres. These areas will be treated in accordance with EPA Green Street standards. A Vicinity Map is included in Section VI. Under existing conditions, the project site is an existing commercial site. Adjacent land uses include commercial sites to the north and east, an elementary school and commercial to the south, and multi- family attached residential and commercial to the west. The table below summarizes the proposed project. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Development Category (Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or 7.11-3): Category 8 All significant redevelopment projects, where significant redevelopment is defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site. Redevelopment does not include routine maintenance activities that are conducted to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, original purpose of the facility, or emergency redevelopment activity required to protect public health and safety. Project Area (ft2): 229,997 ft2 (5.28 acres) # of Dwelling Units: 315 SIC Code: TBD in Final WQMP Narrative Project Description: The proposed project is a redevelopment of an existing commercial area into a mixed-used 4 story development wrapped around a 5 story parking structure. The project will consist of 315 attached-residential units, with 10,500 ft2 of retail space. The parking structure will be in the center of the development with driveway entrances off both Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. As part of the project, an 8’ street widening on Lincoln Avenue and corner dedication at Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street will also be completed, totaling approximately 5,234 ft2 (0.12 acres). Project Area: Pervious Area Pervious Area Percentage Impervious Area Impervious Area Percentage Pre-Project Conditions: 0.26 ac 5% 5.02 ac 95% P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT Post-Project Conditions: 0.79 ac 15% 4.49 ac 85% Drainage Patterns/ Connections: Under existing conditions, runoff from the northern half of the project site flows in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue and then continues in a westerly direction along the street. Flows from the southern half drain in a southerly direction towards Pampas Lane and continue in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue along Euclid Street. All flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street, and discharge out to Carbon Canyon Creek via public storm drain lines. Runoff flows eventually drain to the Pacific Ocean via San Gabriel River. The project will maintain existing drainage patterns. Under proposed conditions, runoff will generally drain towards the perimeter of the site, where new on-site storm drain facilities will collect low flows and convey them to one of three detention systems. From the detention system, runoff will flow into one of three adjacent drywells that will infiltrate runoff back into the site. High flows will be diverted from the detention system and sheet flow to adjacent roadways, similar to existing conditions. PROJECT FEATURES Building Summary: Residential # BR Unit SF Qty. % Total SF Studio 614 44 14% 26,996 1BR 748 164 52% 122,612 2BR 1,054 107 34% 112,784 TOTAL Avg. 773 315 100% 243,448 Commercial A total of 10,500 ft2 of retail space is proposed at the northeast corner of the project site at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street. Total retail units TBD in the Final WQMP. Amenities: The proposed project will include a fitness center, leasing office, and retail. There will be one main recreation courtyard and 3 additional courtyards throughout the development. Landscaping will be provided through the project site. Details are subject to change and will be provided in subsequent Final WQMPs. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT FEATURES Landscaped Areas: Landscaping will be located in the courtyard common areas and perimeter of the building. Landscaping will consist of a mix of turf areas for recreational activities as well as planters and setbacks for passive uses. At this stage of development, approximately 15% of the project site will be landscaped, subject to change upon finalization of the project site. Parking Facilities: The project site will include a 5-story parking structure within the wrap-around development that will provide approximately 800 parking spots. Details are subject to change and will be provided in subsequent Final WQMPs. Other Project Features: The property will include four trash rooms within the parking structure. Trash will be properly disposed of on a weekly schedule. The site will not have any outdoor storage areas, loading dock, vehicle/ community car wash racks, vehicle/equipment wash areas, or commercial kitchens/food preparation areas. Outdoor Activities: Outdoor areas throughout the site will be used for recreational and open space purposes. The recreation areas and amenities are subject to change and will be provided in subsequent Final WQMPs. All other outdoor areas will be used for walkways, common areas and landscaping, and other recreational purposes. Materials Stored: Materials anticipated to be stored on-site include those associated with residential, commercial retail, and pool maintenance (i.e. cleaning products, storage, etc.); however, no hazardous wastes will be stored on-site. No outdoor storage of materials is anticipated (materials will be stored indoors). Wastes Generated: The project is not anticipated to generate any wastes other than landscape clippings, typical trash, debris and refuse from the tenants. Outdoor trash receptacles will be provided throughout the common areas of the site for the tenants to dispose of their refuse in a proper manner, and property maintenance will provide trash and waste material removal to maintain a trash- free property. All wastes shall be collected and properly disposed of off-site. II.2 POTENTIAL STORM WATER POLLUTANTS The table below, derived from Table 2 of the Countywide Model WQMP Technical Guidance Document (May 2011), summarizes the categories of land use or project features of concern and the general pollutant categories associated with them. Priority Project Categories and/or Features: Attached Residential Development, Parking Lots, Commercial Development P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN Pollutant E = Expected to be of concern N =Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended Solid/ Sediment E Erosion from coastal winds and rain Nutrients E Fertilizers, trash and debris, and eroded soils 303(d) listed impairment for downstream receiving waters Heavy Metals E Includes cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc typically associated with building materials and automotive products TMDL & 303(d) listed impairment for downstream receiving waters Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E Commonly found in transport of animal or human feces from watershed TMDL & 303(d) listed impairment for downstream receiving waters Pesticides E Landscape maintenance areas 303(d) listed impairment for downstream receiving waters Oil & Grease E Vehicles leaking, oils, waxes, fats, petroleum hydrocarbon products Toxic Organic Compounds E Includes organic compounds pesticides, solvents, hydrocarbons, cleaning fluids 303(d) listed impairment for downstream receiving waters Trash & Debris E Common in urban landscape/developments II.3 HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF CONCERN The purpose of this section is to identify any hydrologic conditions of concern (HCOC) with respect to downstream flooding, erosion potential of natural channels downstream, impacts of increased flows on natural habitat, etc. As specified in Section 2.3.3 of the 2011 Model WQMP, projects must identify and mitigate any HCOCs. A HCOC is a combination of upland hydrologic conditions and stream biological and physical conditions that presents a condition of concern for physical and/or biological degradation of streams. In the North Orange County permit area, HCOCs are considered to exist if any streams located downstream from the project are determined to be potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts and either of the following conditions exists: P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ▪ Post-development runoff volume for the 2-yr, 24-hr storm exceeds the pre-development runoff volume for the 2-yr, 24-hr storm by more than 5 percent or ▪ Time of concentration (Tc) of post-development runoff for the 2-yr, 24-hr storm event exceeds the time of concentration of the pre-development condition for the 2-yr, 24-hr storm event by more than 5 percent. If these conditions do not exist or streams are not potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts, an HCOC does not exist and hydromodification does not need to be considered further. In the North Orange County permit area, downstream channels are considered not susceptible to hydromodification, and therefore do not have the potential for a HCOC, if all downstream conveyance channels that will receive runoff from the project are engineered, hardened, and regularly maintained to ensure design flow capacity, and no sensitive habitat areas will be affected. Is the proposed project potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts? Yes No (show map) According to Figure XVI-3a within the Technical Guidance Document, the proposed project is in an area that is susceptible to hydromodification impacts. However, the preliminary hydrologic analysis showed that the post-development 2-yr, 24-hr storm runoff volume is not greater than 5%, and in fact runoff volume and peak flows decrease under proposed conditions. The results indicate the 2-year time of concentration (Tc) increases by 8.8% as compared to existing conditions; however, the TGD recognizes that increases in Tc are acceptable, as a longer Tc is generally associated with natural conditions and nearly universally results in lower concerns for hydromodification impacts (TGD, Section 2.2.3.1, footnote 4). Therefore, the project complies with the hydromodification requirements and allowable discharge provisions. Calculations are provided in Appendix G. 2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM SUMMARY Condition Acreage Tc Peak Runoff Volume Pre-development 5.28 ac 12.01 min 06.8 0.73 ac-ft Proposed 5.28 ac 13.07min 0.6.4 0.69 ac-ft Difference 0 + 1.06 min -0.40 - 0.04 ac-ft % Change +8.8% -5.9% - 5.5% P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 8 PROJECT DESCRIPTION II.4 POST DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS Under proposed conditions, runoff will drain generally towards the perimeter of the site, where new on-site storm drain facilities will collect low flows and convey them to one of three detention systems. From the detention system, runoff will flow into one of three adjacent drywells that will infiltrate runoff back into the site. High flows will be diverted from the detention system and sheet flow to adjacent roadways, similar to existing conditions. II.5 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP/MANAGEMENT PROPERTY OWNERSHIP/MANAGEMENT Private Streets Development Advisors, LLC Landscaped Areas: Development Advisors, LLC Open Space: Development Advisors, LLC Buildings: Development Advisors, LLC Structural BMPs: Development Advisors, LLC The Owner, Development Advisors, LLC shall assume all BMP maintenance and inspection responsibilities for the proposed project. Inspection and maintenance responsibilities are outlined in Section V of this report. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 9 SITE DESCRIPTION SECTION III SITE DESCRIPTION III.1 PHYSICAL SETTING Planning Area/ Community Name: 1600 W Lincoln Address: 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Project Area Description: The project site is bounded by Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, West Pampas Lane to the south, and Euclid Street to the west. Land Use: General Commercial Zoning: Existing: C-G General Commercial Proposed: Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone Acreage: 5.28 ac Predominant Soil Type: HSG Type B (see TGD Figure XVI-2a in Appendix A) Impervious Conditions: Existing Impervious: 95% (5% Pervious) Proposed Impervious: 85% (15% Pervious) III.2 SITE CHARACTERISTICS Precipitation Zone: 0.9 inches (see TGD Figure XVI-1 in Appendix A) Topography: The project site is relatively flat (approx. 0.5% grade), and generally drains in a northerly direction. Existing Drainage Patterns/ Connections: Under existing conditions, runoff from the northern half of the project site flows in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue and then continues in a westerly direction along the street. Flows from the southern half drain in a southerly direction towards Pampas Lane and continue in a northerly direction towards Lincoln Avenue along Euclid Street. All flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street, and discharge out to Carbon Canyon Creek via public storm drain lines. Runoff flows eventually drain to the Pacific Ocean via San Gabriel River. Proposed Drainage Patterns/ Connections: The project will maintain existing drainage patterns. New on-site storm drain facilities will be constructed to convey low flows to a detention system and then to adjacent drywells that will infiltrate onsite. High flows will bypass the detention system and sheet flow to adjacent roadways, similar to existing conditions. Flows are then intercepted by catch basins at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Street, and at the corner of Loara Street and Broadway, and discharge out to Carbon Canyon Creek via public storm drain lines. Runoff flows will eventually drain to the Pacific Ocean via San Gabriel River. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 10 SITE DESCRIPTION Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties: Based on a geotechnical report prepared by Albus Keefe on May 8, 2018, six boring holes were drilled to a depth ranging from 15 to 51.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). Artificial fill was encountered to depths of 4 feet bgs, and alluvium consisting of sand and silty sand was encountered at the remaining depths of the boring holes. Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions: Groundwater was not encountered at the boring hole depths of 51.5 feet bgs. Historic high groundwater levels are estimated to be greater than 50 feet bgs, with results showing a groundwater level of approximately 100 feet bgs based on a subsurface investigation of a nearby site (1631 W Lincoln Avenue). Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration): Infiltration tests were performed in 2017 on the project site and found that soils were favorable for infiltration. Two of the six total borings were dug to a depth of 25 feet (B-1) and 15 feet (B-4), and measured infiltration rates were approximately 3.27 in/hr and 68.23 in/hr, respectively (See Appendix F). Applying a safety factor of 2.5, the design infiltration rates are 1.31 in/hr and 27.29 in/hr. Since rates exceeded the 0.3 in/hr minimum outlined in the OC TGD, infiltration is considered feasible for the project site. Off-Site Drainage: The project site does not receive any off-site storm water flows onto the property. Utility and Infrastructure Information: Dry and wet utilities will be incorporated into the proposed project and will tie into existing facilities associated with the existing development. III.3 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION Receiving Waters: Carbon Canyon Creek, Coyote Creek, San Gabriel River Reach 1, San Gabriel River Estuary, Alamitos Bay, San Pedro Bay 303(d) Listed Impairments: ▪ Carbon Canyon Creek: None ▪ Coyote Creek: Ammonia, Dissolved Copper, Diazinon, Indicator Bacteria, Lead, Toxicity, pH ▪ San Gabriel River Reach 1: Coliform Bacteria, pH ▪ San Gabriel River Estuary: Copper, Dioxin, Nickel, Dissolved Oxygen ▪ Alamitos Bay: Indicator Bacteria ▪ San Pedro Bay Near/Offshore Zones: Chlordane, DDT (tissue & sediment), PCBs, Sediment Toxicity Applicable TMDLs: San Gabriel River & Coyote Creek Watersheds (Region 4): Metals (Copper, Lead & Zinc) P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 11 SITE DESCRIPTION Pollutants of Concern for the Project: Per Section II.2 with respect to receiving water impairments: ▪ Nutrients ▪ Heavy Metals ▪ Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) ▪ Pesticides ▪ Toxic Organic Compounds Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOCs): The project site is located in an area identified as “potential areas of erosion, habitat, & physical structure susceptibility” and therefore is susceptible to hydromodification, however peak flows and runoff volumes are anticipated to decrease under proposed conditions. Refer to section II.3 for further information. Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Significant Areas: There are no Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) or Areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) within the project site or within the project’s vicinity. Existing Water Quality Conditions: The SWRCB’s GeoTracker website indicated one former Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) site has been identified within 250 feet of the project site. Geotracker records indicate that the LUST was removed in 1990 and the case was closed A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the project site in 2017. The Phase II investigation consisted of a geophysical survey of the site as well as soil sampling. None of the analyzed soil samples contained detectable concentrations of TPH-cc or PCBs above the laboratory practical quantification limits (PQLs), and the PQLs did not exceed the Maximum Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or Residential Screening Levels (RSLs). Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were detected in two of the analyzed soil samples (B1-5 and B7-5) at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs. The detected concentrations were below the residential and commercial/industrial RSLs. The remaining VOCs were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs, and the PQLs did not exceed residential or commercial/industrial RSLs. Although the report noted a de minimus release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface in the vicinity of the two older clarifiers onsite, it does not appear to be a concern to human health or the environment at this time and will be removed according to state and/or local regulations upon redevelopment of the property. Since the proposed infiltration BMPs will not be located in the vicinity of the former USTs or clarifiers on-site, infiltration of runoff is not expected to impact groundwater quality. In addition, infiltration will occur via drywells, with the majority of infiltration occurring below a depth of 18 feet below ground surface (see Appendix F for details), well below the locations of where previous contaminates were observed. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 12 SITE DESCRIPTION P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 13 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SECTION IV BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs) IV.1 PROJECT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub- regional basis? Yes No PROJECT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Hydromodification Control Performance Criteria: (Model WQMP Section 7.II-2.4.2.2) If a hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC) exists, priority projects shall implement onsite or regional hydromodification controls such that: ▪ Post-development runoff volume for the two-year frequency storm does not exceed that of the predevelopment condition by more than five percent, and ▪ Time of concentration of post-development runoff for the two-year storm event is not less than that for the predevelopment condition by more than five percent. Where the Project WQMP documents that excess runoff volume from the two-year runoff event cannot feasibly be retained and where in-stream controls cannot be used to otherwise mitigate HCOCs, the project shall implement on-site or regional hydromodification controls to: ▪ Retain the excess volume from the two-year runoff event to the MEP, and ▪ Implement on-site or regional hydromodification controls such that the post-development runoff two-year peak flow rate is no greater than 110 percent of the predevelopment runoff two-year peak flow rate. LID Performance Criteria: (Model WQMP Section 7.II-2.4.3) Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter, the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (Design Capture Volume). LID BMPs must be designed to retain, on-site, (infiltrate, harvest and use, or evapotranspire) storm water runoff up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency. Treatment Control BMP Performance Criteria: (Model WQMP Section 7.II-3.2.2) If it is not feasible to meet LID performance criteria through retention and/or biotreatment provided on-site or at a sub-regional/regional scale, then treatment control BMPs shall be provided on-site or offsite prior to discharge to waters of the US. Sizing of treatment control BMP(s) shall be based on either the unmet volume after claiming applicable water quality credits, if appropriate. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 14 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROJECT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA LID Design Storm Capture Volume: DCV = C × d × A × 43560 sf/ac × 1/12 in/ft Where: DCV = design storm capture volume, cu-ft C = runoff coefficient = (0.75 × imp + 0.15) Imp = impervious fraction of drainage area (ranges from 0 to 1) d = storm depth (inches) A = tributary area (acres) Imp = 85% d = 0.90 inches A = 5.28 acres DCV = (0.75 x 0.85 +0.15) x 0.90 inches x 5.28 ac x 43560 sf/ac x 1/12 in/ft = 13,593 Refer to Section IV.2.2 for specific Drainage Manage Area (DMA) breakdown and Appendix A for detailed calculations (Worksheet B). IV.2 SITE DESIGN AND DRAINAGE PLAN The following section describes the site design BMPs used in this project and the methods used to incorporate them. Careful consideration of site design is a critical first step in storm water pollution prevention from new developments and redevelopments. IV.2.1 Site Design BMPs Minimize Impervious Area Impervious surfaces have been minimized by incorporating landscaped areas throughout the site surrounding the proposed building. Landscaping will be provided throughout the site within the common areas as well as around the perimeter and in the courtyards. Maximize Natural Infiltration Capacity Infiltration is deemed feasible based on the geotechnical study performed by Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. Refer to section IV.3.2 for details. Preserve Existing Drainage Patterns and Time of Concentration Runoff from the site will continue to flow similar to existing conditions. Low flows and first-flush runoff will drain to detention systems and infiltrate through drywells for water quality treatment via infiltration. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 15 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Disconnect Impervious Areas Landscaping will be provided adjacent to sidewalks and between the proposed buildings. Low flows and first-flush runoff will drain to detention systems and infiltrate through drywells from water quality treatment via infiltration. Refer to section IV.3.2 for further details. Protect Existing Vegetation and Sensitive Areas, and Revegetate Disturbed Areas There are no existing vegetated or sensitive areas to preserve on the project site. All disturbed areas will either be paved or landscaped. Xeriscape Landscaping Xeriscape is not proposed for the project. However, native and/or tolerant landscaping will be incorporated into the site design consistent with City guidelines. IV.2.2 Drainage Management Areas In accordance with the MS4 permit and the 2011 Model WQMP, the project site has been divided into Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) to be utilized for defining drainage areas and sizing LID and other treatment control BMPs. DMAs have been delineated based on the proposed site grading patterns, drainage patterns, storm drain and catch basin locations. The design capture volumes (DCV) and treatment flow rates (QDesign) for each DMA are summarized in the table below. These have been derived utilizing the “Simple Method” in accordance with the TGD Section III.1.1. Actual BMP sizing requirements, including 80 percent capture design volumes, flow rates, depths, and other design details for the specific BMPs proposed are provided in Section IV.3.2 and IV.3.7 below. Locations of DMAs and associated LID and treatment BMPs are identified on the exhibits in Section VI. Additional calculations and TGD Worksheets are provided in Appendix A. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 16 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREAS (DMAs) DMA/ Drainage Area ID(1) Tributary Drainage Area (ft2) Tributary Drainage Area (ac) % Imp. Design Storm Depth(2) (in) Estimated Tc (min) Rainfall Intensity(3) (in/hr) Simple Method DCV(4) (ft3) QDesign (5) (cfs) DMA A (A1-A2) 61,855 1.42 85 0.9 5 0.26 3,656 0.291 DMA B (B1-B4)) 140,699 3.23 85 0.9 5 0.26 8,315 0.662 DMA C (C1) 27,443 0.63 85 0.9 5 0.26 1,622 0.129 Street Widening Area(6) 5,234 0.12 100 0.9 5 0.26 353 0.028 Notes: 1. Refer to exhibits in Section VI for locations of each DMA. 2. Per Figure XVI-1 of the Technical Guidance Document, dated May 19, 2011. See also Appendix A. 3. Per Figure III.4 of the Technical Guidance Document, dated May 19, 2011. See also Appendix A. 4. Per Section III.1.1 of the Technical Guidance Document. 5. Per Section III.3.3 and Worksheet D of the Technical Guidance Document. 6. Estimated area of street widening may change with final design and may increase. Final calculations will be provided in Final WQMP. IV.3 LID BMP SELECTION AND PROJECT CONFORMANCE ANALYSIS Low Impact Development (LID) BMPs are required in addition to site design measures and source controls to reduce pollutants in storm water discharges. LID BMPs are engineered facilities that are designed to retain or biotreat runoff on the project site. The 4th Term MS4 Storm Water Permit (Order R8-2009-0030) requires the evaluation and use of LID features using the f ollowing hierarchy of treatment: infiltration, evapotranspiration, harvest/reuse, and biotreatment. The following sections summarize the LID BMPs proposed for the project in accordance with the permit hierarchy and performance criteria outlined in Section IV.1. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) Hydrologic source controls (HSCs) can be considered to be a hybrid between site design practices and LID BMPs. HSCs are distinguished from site design BMPs in that they do not reduce the tributary area or reduce the imperviousness of a drainage area; rather they reduce the runoff volume that would result from a drainage area with a given imperviousness compared to what would result if H SCs were not used. HYDROLOGIC SOURCE CONTROLS ID Name Included? HSC-1 Localized on-lot infiltration P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 17 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES HYDROLOGIC SOURCE CONTROLS ID Name Included? HSC-2 Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) HSC-3 Street trees (canopy interception) HSC-4 Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) HSC-5 Green roofs/Brown roofs HSC-6 Blue roofs HSC-7 Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) HSC’s were not incorporated into the project’s design at this stage in the project’s development. Any HSC’s will be accounted for during final design and the cumulative volume of the HSC’s will eb subtracted from the required treatment volume in the Final WQMP. IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Infiltration BMPs are LID BMPs that capture, store and infiltrate storm water runoff. These BMPs are engineered to store a specified volume of water and have no design surface discharge (underdrain or outlet structure) until this volume is exceeded. Examples of infiltration BMPs include infiltration trenches, bioretention without underdrains, drywells, permeable pavement, and underground infiltration galleries. INFILTRATION ID Name Included? INF-3 INF-4 Bioretention Without Underdrains Rain Gardens Porous Landscaping Infiltration Planters Retention Swales INF-2 Infiltration Trenches INF-1 Infiltration Basins INF-5 Drywells INF-7 Subsurface Infiltration Galleries P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 18 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INFILTRATION ID Name Included? -- French Drains INF-6 Permeable Asphalt Permeable Concrete Permeable Concrete Pavers Other: The results in the preliminary infiltration tests found infiltration rates of 68.23 in/hr and 3.27 in.hr in the eastern portion of the site. These rates combined with type B soils deemed infiltration feasible. After discussion with the geotechnical engineers conducting the percolation tests, the peak static flow of 0.29 ft3/sec was instructed as a viable rate to use for drywell design with the appropriate safety factor applied. Three (3) Maxwell IV drywell systems are proposed, one to be located within the drive aisle in the northwest corner of DMA A, one within the drive aisle in the southwest corner of DMA B, and one in the southeast corner of DMA C. Each drywell will be a total of 20 feet deep, with the lower 2 feet consisting of the infiltrating drywell, and the upper 18 feet a concrete settling chamber with weepholes for additional infiltration. The Maxwell IV system incorporates pre-treatment of runoff through a settling chamber that traps trash, floating debris, oil and grease, and large sediment. Pre- treated flows are then diverted to the drywell and surrounding soil. With the incorporation of pretreatment and infiltration, drywells have high removal effectiveness for all storm water pollutants of concern (See Section VI for drywell details). In order to maximize infiltration with the drywells, underground detention systems will be located upstream of the drywells. These systems will temporarily detain the DCV and provide const ant head to the drywells during the drawdown process. A detention gallery system (Contech CMP or equivalent) is proposed to provide detention capacity in addition to the storage capacity of the drywell settling chambers (See Section VI for detention details). The detention galleries prior to the drywells in DMA A, DMA B, and DMA C will have a total storage capacity of 3,336 ft3, 8,030 ft3, and 1,301 ft3, respectively. The total amount of storage including the storage provided by the drywells is approximately 3,686 ft3, 8,380 ft3, and 1,651 ft3 which exceeds the simple method DCV (refer to Section IV.2.2 for the Simple Method DCV). Refer to Appendix A for calculations on drywell and preliminary detention system sizing. Further design details will be provided in the Final WQMP. Runoff from three drainage areas will sheet flow to the perimeter of the site. Low flows will be collected and diverted to pretreatment and detention galleries prior to drywell infiltration. High flows will continue sheet flow off-site to adjacent roadways similar to existing drainage patterns. See Section IV.3.7 for pre-treatment details. IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration & Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Evapotranspiration (ET) BMPs are a class of retention BMPs that discharges stored volume predominately to ET, though some infiltration may occur. ET includes both evaporation and P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 19 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES transpiration, and ET BMPs may incorporate one or more of these processes. BMPs must be designed to achieve the maximum feasible ET, where required to demonstrate that the maximum amount of water has been retained on-site. Since ET is not the sole process in these BMPs, specific design and sizing criteria have not been developed for ET-based BMPs. EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ID Name Included? -- HSCs, see Section IV.3.1 -- Surface-based infiltration BMPs -- Biotreatment BMPs, see Section VI.3.4 Other: Harvest and use (aka. Rainwater Harvesting) BMPs are LID BMPs that capture and store storm water runoff for later use. These BMPs are engineered to store a specified volume of water and have no design surface discharge until this volume is exceeded. Harvest and use BMPs include both above - ground and below-ground cisterns. Examples of uses for harvested water include irrigation, toilet and urinal flushing, vehicle washing, evaporative cooling, industrial processes and other non-potable uses. HARVEST & REUSE / RAINWATER HARVESTING ID Name Included? HU-1 Above-ground cisterns and basins HU-2 Underground detention -- Other: Since infiltration will be utilized for retaining the design capture volume on -site, evapotranspiration BMPs were not incorporated into the project’s design. IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Biotreatment BMPs are a broad class of LID BMPs that reduce storm water volume to the maximum extent practicable, treat storm water using a suite of treatment mechanisms characteristic of biologically active systems, and discharge water to the downstream storm drain system or directly to receiving waters. Treatment mechanisms include media filtration (though biologically -active media), vegetative filtration (straining, sedimentation, interception, and stabilization of particles resulting from shallow flow through vegetation), general sorption processes (i.e., absorption, adsorption, ion- exchange, precipitation, surface complexation), biologically-mediated transformations, and other processes to address both suspended and dissolved constituents. Examples of biotreatment BMPs P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 20 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES include bioretention with underdrains, vegetated swales, constructed wetlands, and proprietary biotreatment systems. BIOTREATMENT ID Name Included? BIO-1 Bioretention with underdrains Storm Water planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains BIO-5 Constructed wetlands BIO-2 Vegetated swales BIO-3 Vegetated filter strips BIO-7 Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems BIO-4 Wet extended detention basin BIO-6 Dry extended detention basins -- Other: Infiltration BMPs will be utilized for retaining the design capture volume on-site. The proposed street widening on Lincoln Avenue and the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street will be treated pursuant to EPA Green Street Standards using a Bioclean Modular Wetlands System with associated underground infiltration, vegetated parkway swale, parkway bioretention, or equivalent. Final street widening footprint, treatment volume, and BMP sizing will be provided as part of the Final WQMP. Based on the proposed widening footprint of 5,234 square feet, a MWS-L-4-4 or 228 square feet of bioretention with 6 inches of ponding and 3.5 feet of media will provide sufficient treatment. Final BMP selection will be based on a City-approved design. IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Not applicable. Refer to Section II.3 for further information. IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Not applicable. LID BMPs (infiltration) will be utilized for water quality treatment on-site in accordance with the MS4 Permit hierarchy identified at the beginning of this Section. IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment control BMPs can only be considered if the project conformance analysis indicates that it is not feasible to retain the full design capture volume with LID BMPs. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 21 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TREATMENT CONTROL BMPs ID Name Included? TRT-1 Sand Filters TRT-2 Cartridge Media Filter PRE-1 Hydrodynamic Separation Device PRE-2 Catch Basin Insert Other: The most important part of all drywell systems is the incorporation of proper upstream pre-treatment to remove solids and fines from entering the final infiltration chamber. The MaxWell IV drywell system itself includes a pretreatment settling chamber and slotted inlet to provide treatment prior to entering the infiltration chamber. However, in order to provide additional pre-treatment and filtration of runoff prior to infiltrating, the detention systems will include upstream pre-treatment devices (Contech StormFilter or equivalent) The Stormfilter unit has been certified for effectiveness as an enhanced pretreatment device by the Washington Department of Ecology Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology (TAPE) program. A StormFilter Unit is a pre-cast vault storm drain insert system that uses passive, siphon-activated media-filled cartridges that trap and adsorb particulates and pollutants. Runoff flows through the filter cartridges containing media and collects in the center of the cartridge for discharge, and flow separators trap floating debris and material. Using a variety of sustainable media and passive filtration, the StormFilter effectively removes TSS, soluble heavy metals, oil and grease, total nutrients, as well as pathogens. Media types include perlite, zeolite, granular activated carbon, and MetalRxTM. Each 18” high cartridge can treat 15 gpm (0.033 cfs). PRETREATMENT BMP SIZING DMA/ Drainage Area ID(1) BMP Tributary Drainage Area (ac) % Imp. QDesign (2) (cfs) BMP Capacity (cfs) DMA A Stormfilter Vault 6’ x 12’, with 9 18” cartridges 1.42 85 0.291 0.297 DMA B Stormfilter Vault 8’ x 16’ with 21 18” cartridges 3.23 85 0.662 0.693 DMA C Stormfilter Vault 6’ x 12’, with 4 18” cartridges 0.63 85 0.129 0.132 Notes: 1 Refer to exhibits in Section VI for locations of each DMA. Per Section Worksheet D of the Technical Guidance Document. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 22 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IV.3.8 Non-Structural Source Control BMPs The table below indicates all BMPs to be incorporated in the project. For those designated as not applicable (N/A), a brief explanation why is provided. NON-STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs ID Name Included? Not Applicable? If Not Applicable, Provide Brief Reason N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants N2 Activity Restrictions N3 Common Area Landscape Management N4 BMP Maintenance N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) No hazardous materials N6 Local Water Quality Permit Compliance Not an industrial facility N7 Spill Contingency Plan No hazardous materials N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance No underground storage tanks are proposed N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance Hazardous materials will not be stored on-site N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation No hazardous materials N11 Common Area Litter Control N12 Employee Training N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks No loading docks are proposed N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection No catch basins are proposed N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets No retail gasoline outlets are proposed N1, Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Educational materials will be provided to tenants, including brochures and restrictions to reduce pollutants from reaching the storm drain system. Examples include tips for pet care, household tips, P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 23 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES and proper household hazardous waste disposal. Tenants will be provided with these materials by the property management prior to occupancy, and periodically thereafter. Refer to Section VII for a list of materials available and attached to this WQMP. Additional materials are available through the County of Orange Stormwater Program website (http://ocwatersheds.com/PublicEd/) and the California Stormwater Quality Association’s (CASQA) BMP Handbooks (https://www.casqa.org/resources/bmp-handbooks). N2, Activity Restrictions The Owner shall develop ongoing activity restrictions that include those that have the potential to create adverse impacts on water quality. Activities include, but are not limited to: handling and disposal of contaminants, fertilizer and pesticide application restrictions, litter control and pick-up, and vehicle or equipment repair and maintenance in non-designated areas, as well as any other activities that may potentially contribute to water pollution. N3, Common Area Landscape Management Management programs will be designed and implemented by the Owner to maintain all the common areas within the project site. These programs will cover how to re duce the potential pollutant sources of fertilizer and pesticide uses, utilization of water-efficient landscaping practices and proper disposal of landscape wastes by the owner/developer and/or contractors. N4, BMP Maintenance The Owner will be responsible for the implementation and maintenance of each applicable non- structural BMP, as well as scheduling inspections and maintenance of all applicable structural BMP facilities through its staff, landscape contractor, and/or any other necessary maintenance contractors. Details on BMP maintenance are provided in Section V of this WQMP, and the O&M Plan is included in Appendix D. N11, Common Area Litter Control The Owner will be responsible for performing trash pickup and sweeping of littered common areas on a weekly basis or whenever necessary. Responsibilities will also include noting improper disposal materials by the public and reporting such violations for investigation. N12, Employee Training All employees of the Owner and any contractors will require training to ensure that employees are aware of maintenance activities that may result in pollutants reaching the storm drain. Training will include, but not be limited to, spill cleanup procedures, proper waste disposal, housekeeping practices, etc. N14, Common Area Catch Basin Inspection All on-site catch basin inlets and drainage facilities shall be inspected and maintained by the Owner at least once a year, prior to the rainy season, no later than October 1st of each year. N15, Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots The Owner shall be responsible for sweeping all on-site drive aisles within the project on a quarterly basis. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 24 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs The table below indicates all BMPs to be incorporated in the project. For those designated as not applicable (N/A), a brief explanation why is provided. STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs ID Name Included? Not Applicable? If Not Applicable, Provide Brief Reason S1 SD-13 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage S2 SD-34 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction No outdoor storage areas are proposed. S3 SD-32 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction No outdoor trash storage areas are proposed. Trash will be managed indoors within the parking structure. S4 SD-12 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation There are no slopes or channels on the project site. S6 SD-31 Properly Design: Dock areas No loading docks are proposed. S7 SD-31 Properly Design: Maintenance bays No maintenance bays are proposed. S8 SD-33 Properly Design: Vehicle wash areas No vehicle wash areas are proposed. S9 SD-36 Properly Design: Outdoor processing areas No outdoor processing areas are proposed. S10 Properly Design: Equipment wash areas No equipment wash areas are proposed. S11 SD-30 Properly Design: Fueling areas No fueling areas are proposed. S12 SD-10 Properly Design: Hillside landscaping Project is not located in a hillside area. S13 Properly Design: Wash water control for food preparation areas No food preparation areas are proposed. S14 Properly Design: Community car wash racks No community car wash racks are proposed. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 25 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES S1/SD-13, Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage The phrase “NO DUMPING! DRAINS TO OCEAN”, or an equally effective phrase approved by the City, will be stenciled on all major storm drain inlets within the project site to alert the public to the destination of pollutants discharged into storm water. Stencils shall be in place prior to release of certificate of occupancy. Stencils shall be inspected for legibility on an annual basis and re-stenciled as necessary. S4/SD-12, Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart c ontrollers, and source control The Owner will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all common landscape areas utilizing similar planting materials with similar water requirements to reduce excess irrigation runoff. The Owner will be responsible for implementing all efficient irrigation systems for common area landscaping including, but not limited to, provisions for water sensors and programmable irrigation cycles. This includes smart timers, rain sensors, and moisture shut-off valves. The irrigation systems shall be in conformance with water efficiency guidelines. Systems shall be tested twice per year, and water used during testing/flushing shall not be discharged to the storm drain system. IV.4 ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE PLAN IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Local jurisdictions may develop a water quality credit program that applies to certain types of development projects after they first evaluate the feasibility of meeting LID requirements on-site. If it is not feasible to meet the requirements for on-site LID, project proponents for specific project types can apply credits that would reduce project obligations for selecting and sizing other treatment BMPs or participating in other alternative programs. WATER QUALITY CREDITS Credit Applicable? Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. Brownfield redevelopment, meaning redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real property which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which have the potential to contribute to adverse ground or surface water quality if not redeveloped. Higher density development projects which include two distinct categories (credits can only be taken for one category): those with more than seven units per acre of development (lower credit allowance); vertical density developments, for example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance) P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 26 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WATER QUALITY CREDITS Credit Applicable? Mixed use development, such as a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that can demonstrate environmental benefits that would not be realized through single use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic with the potential to reduce sources of water or air pollution). Transit-oriented developments, such as a mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; similar to above criterion, but where the development center is within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such projects would not be able to take credit for both categories, but may have greater credit assigned Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). Developments with dedication of undeveloped portions to parks, preservation areas and other pervious uses. Developments in a city center area. Developments in historic districts or historic preservation areas. Live-work developments, a variety of developments designed to support residential and vocational needs together – similar to criteria to mixed use development; would not be able to take credit for both categories. In-fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. Not applicable. Water quality credits will not be applied for the project. LID BMPs will be utilized for water quality treatment on-site in accordance with the MS4 Permit hierarchy identified at the beginning of this Section. IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Not applicable. LID BMPs (infiltration) will be utilized for water quality treatment on-site in accordance with the MS4 Permit hierarchy identified at the beginning of this Section. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 27 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE SECTION V INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR BMPs It has been determined that Development Advisors, LLC shall assume all BMP inspection and maintenance responsibilities for the 1600 W Lincoln project. Contact Name: To be provided in Final WQMP Title: Company: Development Advisors, LLC Address: 2400 East Katella Avenue, Suite 800, Anaheim CA 92806 Phone: Fax: 949.300.8501 Email: Should the maintenance responsibility be transferred at any time during the operational life of Anaheim, such as when an HOA or POA is formed for a project, a formal notice of transfer shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim at the time responsibility of the property subject to this WQMP is transferred. The transfer of responsibility shall be incorporated into this WQMP as an amendment. The Owner shall verify BMP implementation and ongoing maintenance through inspection, self- certification, survey, or other equally effective measure. The certification shall verify that, at a minimum, the inspection and maintenance of all structural BMPs including inspection and performance of any required maintenance in the late summer / early fall, prior to the start of the rainy season. A form that may be used to record implementation, maintenance, and inspection of BMPs is included in Appendix D. The City of Anaheim may conduct verifications to assure that implementation and appropriate maintenance of structural and non-structural BMPs prescribed within this WQMP is taking place at the project site. The Owner shall retain operations, inspections and maintenance records of these BMPs and they will be made available to the City or County upon request. All records must be maintained for at least five (5) years after the recorded inspection date for the lifetime of the project. Long-term funding for BMP maintenance will be provided by Development Advisors, LLC. The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan can be found in Appendix D. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 28 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party INFILTRATION BMPs INF-5 Drywell Performed in accordance with manufacturer specifications. Typical maintenance includes conducting routine inspections for accumulation and cleaning /pollutant removal as necessary from the pre-treatment settling chamber. Quarterly inspections will help maintain optimal performance and to determine typical accumulation levels during both dry-weather and wet-weather flows. The pretreatment settling chamber shall be cleaned when sediment accumulation is at or above the “cleanout line” marked inside of the chamber, and at a minimum of once per year, prior to the start of the storm season. Care should be taken to prevent spills during pollutant removal and cleaning. Oil and other hydrocarbons shall be cleaned out of the settling chamber as needed, once per year at a minimum. See Appendix D for additional maintenance information provided by the manufacturer. Quarterly Inspections Cleanout Annually Owner P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 29 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party CMP (or similar) Detention System The underground detention system shall be inspected annually and after major storm events, and cleaned at a minimum of once per year, prior to the start of the rainy season (October 1st). Cleaning and maintenance will be performed per manufacturer specifications and will typically include removal of any trash and debris and excess sediment within the pipes. Sediment shall be removed when deposits approach within 6 inches of the invert heights of the structures. See Appendix D for additional maintenance information provided by the manufacturer. Annually Owner TRT-2 Contech Stormfilter (Or equivalent) To ensure the functionality of the StormFilter Unit, monitoring and maintenance measures for the project will include: ▪ During the rainy season (October 1 to April 30), the unit should be inspected monthly or prior to a target storm, and annually in May, and cleaned out once per year at a minimum ▪ More frequent inspection throughout the first year of installation are essential to determine the annual loading patterns and confirm suggested maintenance schedule. ▪ Cartridges should be replaced on an as-needed basis, typically every 2 to 3 years. Manufacturer’s specifications may recommend additional maintenance. Per Manufacturer’s Recommendation Owner P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 30 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party TBD Modular Wetlands System with Underground Infiltration, parkway swale, or equivalent treatment approved by the City The proposed BMP to treat the street widening will be maintained in accordance with manufacturer specifications and the Orange County TGD. TBD TBD NON-STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Educational materials will be provided to tenants, including brochures and restrictions to reduce pollutants from reaching the storm drain system. Examples include tips for pet care, household tips, and proper household hazardous waste disposal. Tenants will be provided with these materials by the property management prior to occupancy, and periodically thereafter. Upon first occupancy, Annually thereafter Owner N2 Activity Restrictions The Owner will prescribe activity restrictions to protect surface water quality, through lease terms or other equally effective measure, for the property. Restrictions include, but are not limited to, prohibiting vehicle maintenance or vehicle washing. Ongoing Owner P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 31 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party N3 Common Area Landscape Management Maintenance shall be consistent with City requirements. Fertilizer and/or pesticide usage shall be consistent with County Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers (OC DAMP Section 5.5). Maintenance includes mowing, weeding, and debris removal on a weekly basis. Trimming, replanting, and replacement of mulch shall be performed on an as-needed basis to prevent exposure of erodible surfaces. Trimmings, clippings, and other landscape wastes shall be properly disposed of in accordance with local regulations. Materials temporarily stockpiled during maintenance activities shall be placed away from water courses and storm drains inlets. Monthly Owner N4 BMP Maintenance Maintenance of structural BMPs implemented at the project site shall be performed at the frequency prescribed in this WQMP. Records of inspections and BMP maintenance shall be kept by the Owner and shall be available for review upon request. Ongoing Owner N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) Not Applicable N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance Not Applicable N7 Spill Contingency Plan Not Applicable N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance Not Applicable N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance Not Applicable P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 32 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation Not Applicable N11 Common Area Litter Control Litter patrol, violations investigations, reporting and other litter control activities shall be performed on a weekly basis and in conjunction with routine maintenance activities. Weekly Owner N12 Employee Training The Owner shall educate all new employees/ managers on storm water pollution prevention, particularly good housekeeping practices, prior to the start of the rainy season (October 1). Refresher courses shall be conducted on an as needed basis. Materials that may be utilized on BMP maintenance are included in Appendix D. Annually Owner N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks Not Applicable N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Catch basin inlets and other drainage facilities shall be inspected monthly. Inlets and other facilities shall be cleaned when the sump is 40% full and annually at a minimum. Annually, prior to start of rainy season on October 1 Owner N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots On-site parking lots, drive aisles, and the parking structure basement level will be swept on a monthly basis, at minimum. Monthly Owner N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets Not Applicable STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 33 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party S1 SD-13 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage Storm drain stencils shall be inspected for legibility, at minimum, once prior to the storm season, no later than October 1st each year. Those determined to be illegible will be re-stenciled as soon as possible, once every 5 years at minimum. Annually Owner S2 SD-34 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Not Applicable S3 SD-32 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Not Applicable S4 SD-12 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control In conjunction with routine maintenance, verify that landscape design continues to function properly by adjusting systems to eliminate overspray to hardscape areas and to verify that irrigation timing and cycle lengths are adjusted in accordance to water demands, given the time of year, weather, and day or nighttime temperatures. System testing shall occur twice per year. Water from testing/flushing shall be collected and properly disposed to the sewer system and shall not discharge to the storm drain system. 2x per year Owner S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation Not Applicable S6 SD-31 Properly Design: Dock areas Not Applicable S7 SD-31 Properly Design: Maintenance bays Not Applicable P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 34 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Inspection/Maintenance Activities Minimum Frequency Responsible Party S8 SD-33 Properly Design: Vehicle wash areas Not Applicable S9 SD-36 Properly Design: Outdoor processing areas Not Applicable S10 Properly Design: Equipment wash areas Not Applicable S11 SD-30 Properly Design: Fueling areas Not Applicable S12 SD-10 Properly Design: Hillside landscaping Not Applicable S13 Properly Design: Wash water control for food preparation areas Not Applicable S14 Properly Design: Community car wash racks Not Applicable Any waste generated from maintenance activities will be disposed of properly. Wash water and other waste from maintenance activities is not to be discharged or disposed of into the storm drain system. Clippings from landscape maintenance (i.e. prunings) will be collected and disposed of properly off-site, and will not be washed into the streets, local area drains/conveyances, or catch basin inlets. P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 35 SITE PLAN & DRAINAGE PLAN SECTION VI SITE PLAN AND DRAINAGE PLAN The exhibits provided in this section are to illustrate the post construction BMPs prescribed within this WQMP. Drainage flow information of the proposed project, such as general surface flow lines, concrete or other surface drainage conveyances, and storm drain facilities are also depicted. All structural source control and treatment control BMPs are shown as well. EXHIBITS ▪ Vicinity Map ▪ Site Plan ▪ Preliminary WQMP Exhibit BMP DETAILS & FACT SHEETS ▪ Typical Cross Sections ▪ INF-5 Drywell ▪ TRT-2 Contech Stormfilter ▪ Bioclean Modular Wetlands System (PENDING) P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 36 SITE PLAN & DRAINAGE PLAN VICINITY MAP 134 134 1 3 6 1 3 4 1 3 4 132132132132132132130130130 1 3 2 132 1 3 2 C O N C . 12'X20'LOADINGAREAMOVE-INMOVE-IN ( L ) ( L ) ( L ) S T O P STOP COURTYARD #1 M A I N R E C R E A T I O N C O U R T Y A R D C O U R T Y A R D # 3 C O U R T Y A R D # 2 M O T O R C O U R T Y A R D F I R E L A N E SERVICE LANE F I T N E S S C L U B T R A S H R O O M T R A S H R O O M T R A S H R O O M R E T A I L S P A C E L E A S I N G M A I L R O O M PARKING STRUCTURE T R A S H R O O M SSSSFW FWDWFWSSDWDW DW S S S S SS D W S S S c a l e : 1 " = 8 0 ' E x h i b i t D a t e : 0 9 / 2 7 / 2 0 1 9 1 6 0 0 W L I N C O L N P R E L I M I N A R Y A N A H E I M , C A L E G E N D P R O P E R T Y L I N E P R O P O S E D S T O R M D R A I N P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G S T R E E T S W E E P I N G P R I V A T E S T R E E T S & P A R K I N G L O T S D I R E C T I O N O F S U R F A C E F L O W W Q M P www.fuscoe.com tel 949.474.1960 fax 949.474.5315 Irvine, California 92606 16795 Von Karman, Suite 100 NGIENEERING C A T C H B A S I N S T E N C I L I N G & M A I N T E N A N C E B M P D R A I N A G E A R E A B O U N D A R Y P R O P O S E D D R Y W E L L D R A I N A G E M A N A G E M E N T A R E A A N D A C R E A G E P R O P O S E D U N D E R G R O U N D D E T E N T I O N P R O P O S E D C O N T E C H S T O R M F I L T E R P R O P O S E D L A N D S C A P I N G P R O P O S E D P O O L / S P A / F O U N T A I N P R O P O S E D S T R E E T W I D E N I N G A R E A IN S I D E V A U L T H E I G H T 6' [ 1 8 2 9 ] T Y P I C A L HY D R A U L I C D R O P (H ) I N L E T I N V . TO O U T L E T I N V . PERMANENT POOL ELEV. STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE FLOW KIT STEP CONTRACTOR TO GROUT TO FINISHED GRADE GRADE RING/RISERS (NOT BY CONTECH) INLET PIPE SECTION A-A ALTERNATE PIPE LOCATION (TYP.) 6' - 0 " [ 1 8 2 9 ] 12'-0" [3658] STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE FILTRATION BAY OUTLET BAY PLAN VIEW VAULT STYLE: INLET BAY - OUTLET BAY INLET BAY FLOW INLET OUTLET 6" [152] CONCRETE WALL WIDTH MAY VARY REGIONALLY TOP SLAB ACCESS OF (TYP. OF 2) SEE FRAME AND COVER DETAIL OUTLET PIPE FRAME AND COVER (DIAMETER VARIES) NOT TO SCALE www.ContechES.com ® www.ContechES.com ® 800-338-1122 513-645-7000 513-645-7993 FAX 9025 Centre Pointe Dr., Suite 400, West Chester, OH 45069 SF0612 STORMFILTER VAULT STANDARD DETAIL \\ A D . C O N T E C H - C P I . C O M \ R O O T \ C O M M O N \ C A D \ T R E A T M E N T \ 1 0 S T O R M F I L T E R \ 4 0 S T A N D A R D D R A W I N G S \ S F V A U L T \ D W G \ S F 0 6 1 2 - D T L . D W G 6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 1 : 1 9 A M GENERAL NOTES 1.CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2.DIMENSIONS MARKED WITH ( ) ARE REFERENCE DIMENSIONS. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY. 3.FOR SITE SPECIFIC DRAWINGS WITH DETAILED VAULT DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC REPRESENTATIVE. www.ContechES.com 4.STORMFILTER WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING. 5.STRUCTURE SHALL MEET AASHTO HS20 LOAD RATING, ASSUMING EARTH COVER OF 0' - 5' [1524] AND GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AT, OR BELOW, THE OUTLET PIPE INVERT ELEVATION. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CONFIRM ACTUAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION. CASTINGS SHALL MEET AASHTO M306 AND BE CAST WITH THE CONTECH LOGO. 6.FILTER CARTRIDGES SHALL BE MEDIA-FILLED, PASSIVE, SIPHON ACTUATED, RADIAL FLOW, AND SELF CLEANING. RADIAL MEDIA DEPTH SHALL BE 7-INCHES. FILTER MEDIA CONTACT TIME SHALL BE AT LEAST 38 SECONDS. 7.SPECIFIC FLOW RATE IS EQUAL TO THE FILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY (gpm [L/s]) DIVIDED BY THE FILTER CONTACT SURFACE AREA (sq ft [sq m]). 8.STORMFILTER STRUCTURE SHALL BE PRECAST CONFORMING TO ASTM C-857 AND AASHTO LOAD FACTOR DESIGN METHOD. INSTALLATION NOTES A.ANY SUB-BASE, BACKFILL DEPTH, AND/OR ANTI-FLOTATION PROVISIONS ARE SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. B.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT LIFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT AND SET THE STORMFILTER VAULT. C.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN ALL VAULT SECTIONS AND ASSEMBLE VAULT. D.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE, INSTALL, AND GROUT PIPES. MATCH OUTLET PIPE INVERT WITH OUTLET BAY FLOOR. E.CONTRACTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PROTECT CARTRIDGES FROM CONSTRUCTION-RELATED EROSION RUNOFF. www.contechES.com STORMFILTER DESIGN NOTES · STORMFILTER TREATMENT CAPACITY VARIES BY CARTRIDGE COUNT AND LOCALLY APPROVED SURFACE AREA SPECIFIC FLOW RATE. PEAK CONVEYANCE CAPACITY TO BE DETERMINED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. · A 6' x 12' [1829 mm x 3658 mm] STANDARD VAULT STYLE STORMFILTER IS SHOWN WITH THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES (14) AND IS AVAILABLE IN A RIGHT INLET (AS SHOWN) OR A LEFT INLET CONFIGURATION. OTHER CONFIGURATIONS ARE AVAILABLE. · ALL PARTS AND INTERNAL ASSEMBLY PROVIDED BY CONTECH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CARTRIDGE SIZE (in. [mm])27 [686]18 [457]LOW DROP RECOMMENDED MINIMUM HYDRAULIC DROP (H, ft. [mm])3.05 [930]2.3 [701]1.8 [549] SPECIFIC FLOW RATE (gpm/sf [L/s/m2])2 [1.36]1.67* [1.13]*1 [0.65]2 [1.36]1.67* [1.13]*1 [0.68]2 [1.36]1.67* [1.13]*1 [0.68] CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE (gpm [L/s])22.5 [1.42]18.79 [1.19]11.25 [0.71]15 [0.95]12.53 [0.79]7.5 [0.47]10 [0.63]8.35 [0.53]5 [0.32] * 1.67 gpm/sf [1.13 L/s/m2] SPECIFIC FLOW RATE IS APPROVED WITH PHOSPHOSORB® (PSORB) MEDIA ONLY SITE SPECIFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS STRUCTURE ID WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE (cfs [L/s]) PEAK FLOW RATE (cfs [L/s]) RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW (yrs) CARTRIDGE FLOW RATE CARTRIDGE SIZE (27, 18, LOW DROP (LD)) MEDIA TYPE (PERLITE, ZPG, PSORB) NUMBER OF CARTRIDGES REQUIRED FILTER BAY RIM ELEVATION PIPE DATA:INVERT MATERIAL DIAMETER INLET PIPE 1 INLET PIPE 2 OUTLET PIPE NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: SF0612 STORMFILTER VAULT STANDARD DETAIL \\ A D . C O N T E C H - C P I . C O M \ R O O T \ C O M M O N \ C A D \ T R E A T M E N T \ 1 0 S T O R M F I L T E R \ 4 0 S T A N D A R D D R A W I N G S \ S F V A U L T \ D W G \ S F 0 6 1 2 - D T L . D W G 6/ 3 / 2 0 1 9 1 1 : 1 9 A M THIS PRODUCT MAY BE PROTECTED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING U.S. PATENTS: 5,322,629; 5,524,576; 5,707,527; 5,985,157; 6,027,639; 6,649,048; RELATED FOREIGN PATENTS, OR OTHER PATENTS PENDING. ITEM NUMBERS The MaxWell IV Drainage System Detail And Specifications 2' ES T I M A T E D T O T A L D E P T H W I T H 1 0 ' P E N E T R A T I O N I N T O P E R M E A B L E S O I L S SE T T L I N G C H A M B E R D E P T H OV E R F L O W H E I G H T Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com CALIFORNIA 661-947-9836 ARIZONA 602-268-0785 NEVADA 702-366-1234 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4, ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080, C-42, HAZ. NV Lic. 0035350 A - NM Lic. 90504 GF04 U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 - TM Trademark 1974, 1990, 2004 1 153 2 18 17 8 7 5 16 9 6 11 12 10 14 12 13 1. MANHOLE CONE - MODIFIED FLAT BOTTOM. 2. BOLTED RING & GRATE - DIAMETER AS SHOWN. CLEAN CAST IRON WITH WORDING "STORM WATER ONLY" IN RAISED LETTERS. BOLTED IN 2 LOCATIONS AND SECURED TO CONE WITH MORTAR. RIM (/(9$7,21 2)3/$16 3. GRADED BASIN OR PAVING (BY OTHERS). 4. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE SLEEVE, MIRAFITM/ 140 NL. 0,1)7+(/'$3352;)((72))7+( BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION. 5. PUREFLO DEBRIS SHIELD - ROLLED 16 GA. STEEL X 24" LENGTH WITH VENTED ANTI-SIPHON AND INTERNAL .265" MAX. SWO FLATTENED EXPANDED STEEL SCREEN X 12" LENGTH. FUSION BONDED EPOXY COATED. 6. PRE-CAST LINER - 4000 PSI CONCRETE 48" ID. X 54" OD. CENTER IN HOLE AND ALIGN SECTIONS TO MAXIMIZE BEARING SURFACE. EIGHT (8) PERFORATIONS PER FOOT, 2 ROWS MINIMUM. 7.0,1 '5,//('6+$)7. 8. SUPPORT BRACKET - FORMED 12 GA. STEEL. FUSION BONDED EPOXY COATED. 9. OVERFLOW PIPE - SCH. 40 PVC MATED TO DRAINAGE PIPE AT BASE SEAL. 10. DRAINAGE PIPE - ADS HIGHWAY GRADE WITH TRI-A COUPLER. SUSPEND PIPE DURING BACKFILL OPERATIONS TO PREVENT BUCKLING OR BREAKAGE. DIAMETER AS NOTED. 11. BASE SEAL - GEOTEXTILE OR CONCRETE SLURRY. 12. ROCK - WASHED, SIZED BETWEEN 3/8" AND 1-1/2" TO BEST COMPLEMENT SOIL CONDITIONS. 13. FLOFAST DRAINAGE SCREEN - SCH. 40 PVC 0.120" SLOTTED WELL SCREEN WITH 32 SLOTS PER ROW/FT. 120" OVERALL LENGTH WITH TRI-B COUPLER. 14.0,1 6+$)7 - DRILLED TO MAINTAIN PERMEABILITY OF DRAINAGE SOILS. 15. FABRIC SEAL - U.V. RESISTANT GEOTEXTILE - TO BE REMOVED BY CUSTOMER AT PROJECT COMPLETION. 16. ABSORBENT - HYDROPHOBIC PETROCHEMICAL SPONGE. MIN. 128 OZ. CAPACITY. TYPICAL, TWO PER CHAMBER. 17. FREEBOARD DEPTH VARIES WITH INLET PIPE ELEVATION. INCREASE SETTLING CHAMBER DEPTH AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN ALL INLET PIPE ELEVATIONS ABOVE OVERFLOW PIPE INLET. 18. STABILIZED BACKFILL - TWO-SACK SLURRY MIX. 19. INLET PIPE (BY OTHERS). 6 18 4 4 IN L E T P I P E I N V E R T 19 30" TB D TB D 18 20 6" Manufactured and Installed Exclusively by Torrent Resources Incorporated Please see reverse side for additional information U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 ™Trademark 1974, 1987, 2004 11/04 DRAINAGE SYSTEM Product Information and Design Features MaxWell ™ IV The MaxWell™IV,as manufactured and installed exclusively by Torrent Resources Incorporated, is the industry standard for draining landscaped developments and paved areas. This patented system incorporates the latest refinements in pre-treatment technology. PROVEN DESIGN Since 1974, over 40,000 MaxWell Systems have proven their value as a cost-effective solution in a wide variety of drainage applications. They are accepted by state and municipal agencies and are a standard detail in numerous drainage manuals. ADVANCED PRE-TREATMENT Industry research, together with Torrent Resource’s own experience, has shown that initial storm drainage flows have the greatest impact on system performance. This “first flush” occurs during the first few minutes of runoff and carries the majority of sediment and debris. This results in the need for effective processing of runoff from landscaped and paved surfaces. In the MaxWell IV, preliminary treatment is provided through collection and separation in a deep, large-volume chamber where silt and other heavy particles settle to the bottom. The standard MaxWell IV system has over 1,500 gallons of capacity to contain sediment and debris carried by incoming water. Floating trash, paper, pavement oil, etc. is effectively stopped by the PureFlo™Debris Shield on top of the overflow pipe. Water is drained from the system by rising up to the top of the overflow pipe and under the Debris Shield. The solid metal shields are equipped with an internal screen to filter suspended matter and are vented to prevent siphoning of floating surface debris. The drainage assembly returns the cleaned water to the surrounding soil through the FloFast™Drainage Screen. ABSORBENT TECHNOLOGY To provide prompt removal of pavement oils, MaxWell IV settling chambers are equipped with an absorbent sponge. These floating pillow-like devices are 100% water repellent and literally wick petrochemical compounds from the water.Each sponge has a capacity of over 128 ounces to accommodate effective, long-term treatment. The absorbent is completely inert and will safely remove rainbow sheens which are typically one molecule thick. SECURITY FEATURES MaxWell IV Systems include bolted, theft-resistant, cast iron gratings and covers as standard security features. Special inset castings that are resistant to loosen- ing from accidental impact are available for use in landscaped applications. Machined mating surfaces and “Storm Water Only” wording are standard. THE MAXWELL FIVE-YEAR WARRANTY Innovative engineering, quality materials and exacting construction are standard with every MaxWell system produced and installed by Torrent Resources Incorporated. The MaxWell Drainage Systems warranty is the best in the industry and guarantees against failures due to workmanship or materials for a period of five years from date of completion. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS The Stormwater Management StormFilter ® Contech is your partner in stormwater management solutions Your Contech Team Contech is the leader in stormwater solutions, helping engineers, contractors and owners with infrastructure and land development projects throughout North America. With our responsive team of stormwater experts, local regulatory expertise and flexible solutions, Contech is the trusted partner you can count on for stormwater management solutions. The experts you need to solve your stormwater challenges STORMWATER CONSULTANT It’s my job to recommend the best solution to meet permitting requirements. STORMWATER DESIGN ENGINEER I work with consultants to design the best approved solution to meet your project’s needs. REGULATORY MANAGER I understand the local stormwater regulations and what solutions will be approved. SALES ENGINEER I make sure our solutions meet the needs of the contractor during construction. Contech is your partner in stormwater management solutions Your Contech Team ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS As stormwater quality regulations become more stringent, engineers need a filtration device that can tackle the most challenging pollutants and provide the flexibility to meet the needs of a variety of sites. The Stormwater Management StormFilter® is an underground stormwater treatment device comprised of one or more structures that house rechargeable, media-filled cartridges that trap particulates and adsorb pollutants from stormwater runoff such as total suspended solids, hydrocarbons, nutrients, metals, and other common pollutants. With media options to target multiple or specific pollutants, multiple system configurations, and field and laboratory performance verified by the most stringent stormwater technology evaluation organizations; the StormFilter provides engineers the most flexible and most reliable manufactured treatment technology available. An 8’ x 24’ Stormwater Management StormFilter with 60 cartridges is used to remove pollutants from runoff at Surfers Point Beach in Ventura, California. Flexible Stormwater Filtration Technology Design flexibility to meet your unique site requirements During a storm, runoff passes through the filtration media and starts filling the cartridge center tube. The air inside the hood is purged through a one-way check valve as the water rises. When water reaches the top of the float, buoyant forces pull the float free and allow filtered water to exit the cartridge. A siphon is established within each cartridge that draws water uniformly across the full height of the media bed ensuring even distribution of pollutants and prolonged media longevity. After the storm, the water level in the structure starts falling. A hanging water column remains under the cartridge hood until the water level reaches the scrubbing regulators at the bottom of the hood. Air then rushes through the regulators, breaking the siphon and creating air bubbles that agitate the surface of the filter media, causing accumulated sediment to settle on the treatment bay floor. This unique surface-cleaning mechanism prevents surface blinding and further extends cartridge life. How the StormFilter Treats Stormwater Learn More: www.ContechES.com/stormfilter The StormFilter has a 20+ year history of successful installations and over 200,000 cartridges installed worldwide. FEATURE BENEFIT Siphon actuated, high surface area media cartridges Stormwater is drawn evenly through the filter media providing efficient, effective stormwater treatment Multiple cartridge heights Flexibility to meet site-specific hydraulic needs and reduce system size and costs Multiple media options Ability to target specific pollutants of concern including TSS, phosphorus, heavy metals, and hydrocarbons Internal peak bypass and multiple configurations Design flexibility to meet your unique site requirements Maintenance intervals of one to five years Fewer maintenance events and reduced long-term ownership costs Performance verified by both the WA DOE and NJ DEP Superior pollutant capture with confidence Arrives to the jobsite fully assembled Factory build ensures quality and a simple, fast installation onsite CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KLM KLM KLM 18 DATEAPPCK'DDESCRIPTIONREV. DRN. BY:DES. BY:CK'D. BY: DATEPRINCIPAL ENGINEER EXP. 6-30-1037064 DATER.C.E. NUMBER SPEC. NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER2008-016 93959 SHEET OF 29 FILE NO.2008-D-016 SU R F E R ' S P O I N T A California Corporation | Victor Montgomery, Architect #C11090 | Jerry Michael, PE #36895, LS #6276 | Jeff Ferber, LA #2844P: (805) 543-1794 | F: (805) 543-4609 | www.rrmdesign.com3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 JOE MCDERMOTT Note: Indicated media are most effective for associated pollutant type. Other media may treat pollutants, but to a lesser degree. ZPG™ media is a proprietary blend of zeolite, perlite, and GAC, and is also available. Design flexibility to meet your unique site requirements PH O S P H O S O R B CS F ZP G PE R L I T E Sediments ✓✓✓✓ Oil and Grease ✓✓✓✓ Soluble Metals ✓✓✓ Organics ✓✓ Nutrients ✓✓✓ Total Phosphorus ✓ StormFilter Media Options Cartridge Options Flexibility to target site-specific pollutants ... PhosphoSorb® is a lightweight media built from a Perlite-base that removes total phosphorus (TP) by adsorbing dissolved-P and filtering particulate-P simultaneously. CSF® Leaf Media is created from deciduous leaves processed into granular, organic media. CSF is most effective for removing soluble metals, TSS, oil and grease, and buffering acid rain. Perlite is naturally occurring puffed volcanic ash. Effective for removing TSS, oil, and grease. Zeolite is a naturally occurring mineral used to remove soluble metals, ammonium, and some organics. GAC (Granular Activated Carbon) has a micro-porous structure with an extensive surface area to provide high levels of adsorption. It is primarily used to remove oil and grease and organics such as PAHs and phthalates. Flexibility to reduce size and costs ... Every site is different, and one size does not fit all. Multiple cartridge heights give you design flexibility to design the StormFilter specifically for your site and reduce the cost of the system for the owner. 27” cartridge – Capitalizing on sites with at least 3.05 feet of available driving head, media surface area is maximized to allow the greatest treatment rate per cartridge; best for sites with footprint constraints 18” cartridge - The original StormFilter cartridge size provides a middle ground and operates with 2.3 feet of driving head Low Drop – Provides filtration treatment with only 1.8 feet of headloss; best for sites with limited by hydraulic constraints ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS footprint/system size Small Low DropFootprint 1.8 ft 2.3 ft 3.05 ft hy d r a u l i c dr o p CARTRIDGE FLOW RATES Cartridge Height 2 gpm/ft2 1.67* gpm/ft2 1 gpm/ft2 12” LD 10 gpm 8.35 gpm 5 gpm 18”15 gpm 12.53 gpm 7.5 gpm 27”22.5 gpm 18.79 gpm 11.25 gpm MASS LOAD CAPACITY Cartridge Height 2 gpm/ft2 1.67* gpm/ft2 1 gpm/ft2 12” LD 15 lbs 18 lbs 24 lbs 18”22.5 lbs 27 lbs 36 lbs 27”33.8 lbs 40.45 lbs 54 lbs * For use with Phosphosorb media as per WA DOE GULD approval.* For use with Phosphosorb media as per WA DOE GULD approval. Washington State Department of Ecology (TAPE) GULD – Basic, Phosphorus New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJ DEP) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) Maryland Department of the Environment (MD DOE) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VA DEQ) Maine Department of Environmental Protection (ME DEP) St. Louis Metropolitan Sewer District Configurations Select StormFilter Approvals The StormFilter has been verified by some of the most stringent stormwater technology evaluation organizations in North America, including: Flexibility to accommodate flows, project footprints, and hydraulics ... The structures that house the filter cartridges can be constructed in a variety of ways to accommodate a wide range of flows, project footprints, and variable hydraulic conditions. Standard configurations include catch basin, manhole, vault, curb inlet, and linear grate. The Peak Diversion StomFilter provides treatment and high flow bypass in one precast vault, eliminating the need for an external bypass or junction structures. The Volume StormFilter is designed to meet volume-based treatment regulations and can be combined with upstream storage to treat and drawdown the water quality volume within the required drain down time. The Cast-in-Place StormFilter structures allow the highest degree of flexibility and are available for installations within buildings or other areas where precast structures cannot be accommodated. On-site Contractor assistance is provided to ensure the finished product meets Contech’s standards for fit and function. Verified by some of the most stringent organizations CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KLM KLM KLM 18 DATEAPPCK'DDESCRIPTIONREV. DRN. BY:DES. BY:CK'D. BY: DATEPRINCIPAL ENGINEER EXP. 6-30-1037064 DATER.C.E. NUMBER SPEC. NUMBER PROJECT NUMBER2008-016 93959 SHEET OF 29 FILE NO.2008-D-016 SU R F E R ' S P O I N T A California Corporation | Victor Montgomery, Architect #C11090 | Jerry Michael, PE #36895, LS #6276 | Jeff Ferber, LA #2844P: (805) 543-1794 | F: (805) 543-4609 | www.rrmdesign.com3765 South Higuera St., Ste. 102, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 JOE MCDERMOTT StormFilter Maintenance APPLICATION TIPS • Clogging is a major factor in the failure of filter systems. Look for systems that offer mechanisms that prevent clogging, extend service life, and reduce life-cycle cost. • A compact design reduces construction, installation, and life-cycle cost, so look for systems that offer the most flexibility in design and construction. • All media filters will eventually need to be replaced. Look for filters that have lightweight cartridges and provide easy access for maintenance. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS An easy-to-access treatment system can make all the difference in maintenance expenses. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Verified by some of the most stringent organizations ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Every manufactured filtration device will eventually need routine maintenance. The question is how often and how much it will cost. Proper evaluation of long-term maintenance costs should be a consideration when selecting a manufactured treatment device. The StormFilter has been optimized to reduce long-term maintenance costs with proven, repeatable performance in the laboratory and in the field. Reduce Life Cycle Costs - StormFilter has been designed for predictable maintenance intervals ranging from 1 to 5 years, resulting in fewer maintenance events and reduced life-cycle costs compared to other filtration devices. Easy to maintain - All StormFilter structures provide access for inspection, media replacement, and washing of the structure. Visual indicators for maintenance are observable from the surface. Cartridge replacement program provides refurbished cartridges that are shipped to your site ready to install. Contech arranges for empty cartridges to be picked up and shipped back, reducing cartridge costs and environmental impact. Maintenance support - Contech has created a network of Certified Maintenance Providers to provide StormFilter maintenance at the lowest possible cost. Few companies offer the wide range of high- quality stormwater resources you can find with us — state-of-the-art products, decades of expertise, and all the maintenance support you need to operate your system cost-effectively. Get social with us: 800-338-1122 | www.ContechES.com NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A WARRANTY. APPLICATIONS SUGGESTED HEREIN ARE DESCRIBED ONLY TO HELP READERS MAKE THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS AND DECISIONS, AND ARE NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTIES OF SUITABILITY FOR ANY APPLICATION. CONTECH MAKES NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RELATED TO THE APPLICATIONS, MATERIALS, COATINGS, OR PRODUCTS DISCUSSED HEREIN. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED BY CONTECH. SEE CONTECH’S CONDITIONS OF SALE (AVAILABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION. © 2019 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC, a QUIKRETE Company All Rights Reserved. Printed in the USA., ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS A partner you can rely on THE CONTECH WAY Contech® Engineered Solutions provides innovative, cost-effective site solutions to engineers, contractors, and developers on projects across North America. Our portfolio includes bridges, drainage, erosion control, retaining wall, sanitary sewer and stormwater management products. TAKE THE NEXT STEP For more information: www.ContechES.com STORMWATER SOLUTIONS PIPE SOLUTIONS STRUCTURES SOLUTIONS P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 37 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS SECTION VII EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS The educational materials included in this WQMP are provided to inform people involved in future uses, activities, or ownership of the site about the potential pitfalls associated with careless storm water management. “The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door” provides users with information about storm water that is/will be generated on site, what happens when water enters a storm drain, and its ultimate fate, discharging into the ocean. Also included are activities guidelines to educate anyone who is or will be associated with activities that have a potential to impact storm water runoff quality, and provide a menu of BMPs to effectively reduce the generation of storm water runoff pollutants from a variety of activities. The educational materials that may be used for the proposed project are included in Appendix C of this WQMP and are listed below. EDUCATION MATERIALS Residential Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Attached Business Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Attached The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) (https://www.casqa.org/resources/b mp-handbooks) Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) DF-1 Drainage System Operation & Maintenance Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) R-1 Automobile Repair & Maintenance Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) R-2 Automobile Washing Tips for Maintaining Septic Tank Systems R-3 Automobile Parking Responsible Pest Control R-4 Home & Garden Care Activities Sewer Spill R-5 Disposal of Pet Waste Tips for the Home Improvement Projects R-6 Disposal of Green Waste Tips for Horse Care R-7 Household Hazardous Waste Tips for Landscaping and Gardening R-8 Water Conservation Tips for Pet Care SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning Tips for Pool Maintenance SD-11 Roof Runoff Controls Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains SD-12 Efficient Irrigation Tips for Projects Using Paint SD-13 Storm Drain Signage Tips for Protecting Your Watershed SD-31 Maintenance Bays & Docs Other: Children’s Brochure SD-32 Trash Storage Areas P RELIMI NARY W ATER Q UALITY M ANAGEMENT P LAN (WQMP) 1600 W LINCOLN AVENUE SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 DEVELOPMENT ADVISORS, LLC 38 APPENDICES APPENDICES Appendix A ............................................................................................... Supporting Calculations Appendix B ................................................................................. Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Appendix C .................................................................................................. Educational Materials Appendix D .................................................................. BMP Maintenance Supplement / O&M Plan Appendix E .................................................................... Conditions of Approval – Pending Issuance Appendix F ..................................................................................................... Geotechnical Report Appendix G .................................................................................... Hydromodification Calculations APPENDIX A SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS DRYWELL SIZING CALCULATIONS Date: July 13, 2018 Project: 1600 W Lincoln, Anaheim CA Job: 1267-001-01 Design Capture Volume (DCV) In accordance with Section III.1.1 and Worksheet B of the TGD, the project DCV is calculated as follows: 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷=𝐷𝐷 × 𝑑𝑑 × 𝐴𝐴 × 43,560 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎× 112 𝑠𝑠𝑓𝑓/𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝐷𝐷=(0.75 × 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 +0.15) Where: DCV = design capture volume, in ft3 C = runoff coefficient Imp = impervious fraction of drainage area d = storm depth per Figure XVI-1, in inches A = tributary area, in acres Refer to Worksheet B for DCV calculations for the individual DMAs. Drywell Design for Water Quality Volume Given for each Drywell: Drywell Settling Chamber Depth 18 ft Drywell Settling Chamber Radius 3 ft Drywell Infiltrating Depth (h) 2 ft Drywell Total Depth 20 ft Drywell Infiltrating Radius (r) 2 ft Drywell Dead Storage Volume (V Drywell ) 349.3 ft3 Drywell Infiltrating Surface Area 188.5 ft2 Infiltration Rate 0.29 cfs Safety Factor (S total ) 2.5 Design Infiltration Rate 0.1 cfs Per the geotechnical engineer, each drywell has an infiltrating flow rate of 0.29 cfs. After accounting for a safety factor of 2.5, each drywell has the capacity to infiltrate 0.1 cfs at a constant rate. The total volume infiltrated in 48 hours by each drywell is calculated as follows: 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎𝑇𝑇 𝐷𝐷𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝐼𝐼𝑖𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑖𝑇𝑇𝑓𝑓𝐼𝐼𝑎𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑 (𝐷𝐷48 )= 0.1 𝑎𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 × 3,600 𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎ℎ𝐼𝐼× 48 ℎ𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠 =0.1 𝑎𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 × 3,600 𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎ℎ𝐼𝐼× 48 ℎ𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠 =17,280 𝑠𝑠𝑓𝑓3 In order to calculate the additional storage volume needed to adequately capture the DCV for infiltration over 48 hours by the drywell, the storage volume of the drywell is compared with the required DCV for each DMA. 𝐷𝐷𝑉𝑉𝑓𝑓𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑇𝑇𝑖𝑖 𝐷𝐷𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝑅𝑅𝑉𝑉𝑅𝑅𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝐼𝐼𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑=𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷−𝐷𝐷𝐼𝐼𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝐷𝐷𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝐷𝐷 A detention system is then sized in order to capture the required detention volume, and the time for the drywell to infiltrate the detained volume is calculated as follows: 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑓𝑓𝑎𝑎𝑇𝑇 𝐷𝐷𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 𝑆𝑆𝑓𝑓𝑇𝑇𝐼𝐼𝑉𝑉𝑑𝑑 (𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆)=𝐷𝐷𝑉𝑉𝑓𝑓𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑇𝑇𝑖𝑖 𝐷𝐷𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 (𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷)+𝐷𝐷𝐼𝐼𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 𝐷𝐷𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝑖𝑖𝑉𝑉 �𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷� 𝐷𝐷𝐼𝐼𝑎𝑎𝐷𝐷𝑑𝑑𝑇𝑇𝐷𝐷𝑖𝑖 (ℎ𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝐼𝐼𝑠𝑠)=𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑄𝑄𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑆𝑆𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷÷ 3,600 𝑠𝑠𝑉𝑉𝑎𝑎1 ℎ𝑇𝑇𝑉𝑉𝐼𝐼 Refer to Section VI and Appendix F for drywell design details and supporting information provided by the manufacturer and the geotechnical consultant. Further details on the proposed BMP design including pipe sizes and inverts are provided in the Final WQMP. DRYWELL DESIGN SUMMARY DMA(1) DCV(2) (ft3) Volume Stored in Drywells (V Drywell , ft3) Minimum Volume to Store Upstream (V Detention , ft3) Volume Stored Upstream (V Detention , ft3) Time to Drawdown Volume Stored @ Constant Head (hours) Time to Drawdown Drywell @ Variable Head (hours) Total Volume Infiltrated in 48 hours @ Constant Head (ft3) Total Drawdown Time (hours) A 3655.6 349.3 3,306.3 3,310(3) 10.2 3 17,280 13.2 B 8,315.3 349.3 7,966.0 8,000(4) 23.2 3 17,280 26.2 C 1,621.9 349.3 1,272.5 1,300(5) 4.6 3 17,280 7.6 Notes: 1) Refer to exhibits in Section VI for locations of each DMA. 2) Per Section III.1.1 and Worksheet B of the Technical Guidance Document dated December 20, 2013. See Appendix A for detailed calculations and worksheets. 3) Consists of one row of 72-inch diameter CMP storage pipe with a length of 118 feet per row. Pending final design. 4) Consists of two rows of 72-inch diameter CMP storage pipes with a total length of 142 feet per row. Pending final design. 5) Consists of one row of 72-inch diameter CMP storage pipe with a length of 46 feet per row. Pending final design. Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Project: 1600 W. Lincoln Date: 7/13/2018 DMA = Total Site DMA A DMA B DMA C 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches)d= 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC=0000inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, d remainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder=0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 inches 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP(s), A (acres)A= 5.28 1.42 3.23 0.63 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 85% 85% 85% 85% % 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 4 Calculate runoff volume, V design = (C x d remainder x A x 43560 x (1/12))Vdesign=13,592.8 3,655.6 8,315.3 1,621.9 cu-ft 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, K measured (in/hr) (Appendix VII)Kmeasured= 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, S final (unitless)Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, K design = K measured / S final Kdesign= 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), D max = K design x T x (1/12) Dmax=feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), A min = V design / d max Amin=sq-ft See attached drywell calcualtions Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the DCV Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 0.29 cfs 2.50 0.1 cfs F:\Projects\1267\002\_Support Files\Reports\WQMP\Preliminary WQMP\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_2018-07-06; B-1 7/13/2018 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Project: 1600 W. Lincoln Date: 7/13/2019 DMA A DMA B DMA C 1 Enter the time of concentration, T c (min) (See Appendix IV.2)Tc=5.0 5.0 5.0 min 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (T c) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I 1 I1=0.26 0.26 0.26 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC=0 0 0 inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y 2 (Worksheet A)Y2=0% 0% 0% % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (T c) achieves the upstream capture efficiency (Y2), I 2 I2=0 0 0 in/hr 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, I design = I 1 - I 2 Idesign=0.260 0.260 0.260 in/hr 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP(s), A (acres)A= 1.420 3.230 0.630 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 85.0% 85.0% 85.0% % 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C = (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.788 0.788 0.788 4 Calculate design flowrate, Q design = (C x i design x A)Qdesign=0.291 0.662 0.129 cfs Describe System: Media Filtration Pre-Treatment Unit Size / Model =Stormfilter 18" Cartridge Stormfilter 18" Cartridge Stormfilter 18" Cartridge Unit Size / Model Treatment Capacity = 0.0 0.0 0.0 cfs Number of Units Needed = 9 21 4 Total Treatment Provided = 0.3 0.7 0.13 cfs Provide time of concentration assumptions: Assumed = 5 minutes for conservative estimate Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate Supporting Calculations F:\Projects\1267\002\_Support Files\Reports\WQMP\Preliminary WQMP\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_2018-07-06; D-1 (filter)7/11/2019 Project: 1600 W. Lincoln Date: 7/13/2018 Factor Description Assigned Weight (w) Factor Value (v) Product (p) p = w x v Soil assessment methods 0.25 2 0.5 Predominate soil type 0.25 1 0.25 Site soil variability 0.25 1 0.25 Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 1 0.25 1.25 Tributary area size 0.25 2 0.5 Level of pretreatment/ expected sediment loads 0.25 2 0.5 Redundancy 0.25 3 0.75 Compaction during construction 0.25 1 0.25 2 Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms: Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate Worksheet 2.50 Combined Safety Factor, STOT = SA x SB Measured Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KM (corrected for test-specific bias)0.29 cfs Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = STOT / KM 0.1 cfs Factor Category A Suitability Assessment Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = Σp BDesign Design Assessment Safety Factor, SB = Σp Supporting Data For all high concerns, assign a factor value of 3, for medium concerns, assign a factor value of 2, and for low concerns assign a factor value of 1. Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. See Appendix F for geotechnical engineer recommendations for drywell design for this preliminary phase of hte project. Although the locations tested differ slightly than the currently proposed infiltration BMPs, the infiltration rates are anticipated to be similar throughout the site. During the final deisgn, infiltration rates and safety factors may be adjusted after any additional testing be conducted on-site. Any changes will be reflected in the Final WQMP. F:\Projects\1267\002\_Support Files\Reports\WQMP\Preliminary WQMP\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_2018-07-06; H-Safety Factors 7/13/2018 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Project: 1600 W Lincoln Date: 9/27/2019 Street Widening 1 Enter the time of concentration, T c (min) (See Appendix IV.2)Tc=5.0 min 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (Tc) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I 1 I1=0.260 in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, d HSC (inches) (Worksheet A)dHSC=0 inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y 2 (Worksheet A)Y2=0% % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency (Y2), I 2 I2=0 in/hr 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, I design = I 1 - I 2 Idesign=0.260 in/hr 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP(s), A (acres)A= 0.120 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 100.0% % 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C = (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.900 4 Calculate design flowrate, Q design = (C x i design x A)Qdesign=0.028 cfs Describe System: Proprietary BioTreatment (BIO-7): Unit Size / Model = MWS-L-4-4 Unit Size / Model Treatment Capacity = 0.052 cfs Number of Units Needed = 1 Total Bio-treatment Provided = 0.052 cfs Provide time of concentration assumptions: 5.0 min Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate Supporting Calculations P:\Library\Watershed_Library\Report Templates\Fuscoe_North OC WQMP 2013\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_blank; D-1 (MWS)9/26/2019 Figure III.4. Capture Efficiency Nomograph for Off-line Flow-based Systems in Orange County P:\Library\Watershed_Library\Report Templates\Fuscoe_North OC WQMP 2013\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_blank; D-1 (MWS)9/26/2019 Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors Table VII.4: Design Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors F:\Projects\1267\002\_Support Files\Reports\WQMP\Preliminary WQMP\Appendices\Appendix A_Calcs & worksheets\WQ Calcs Worksheets_2018-07-06; H-Safety Factors 7/13/2018 Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 1 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk for groundwater related concerns? Refer to Appendix VII (Worksheet I) for guidance on groundwater-related infiltration feasibility criteria. X Provide basis: See Worksheet I for details. 2 Would Infiltration BMPs pose significant risk of increasing risk of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level? (Yes if the answer to any of the following questions is yes, as established by a geotechnical expert): The BMP can only be located less than 50 feet away from slopes steeper than 15 percent The BMP can only be located less than eight feet from building foundations or an alternative setback. A study prepared by a geotechnical professional or an available watershed study substantiates that stormwater infiltration would potentially result in significantly increased risks of geotechnical hazards that cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level. X Provide basis: 3 Would infiltration of the DCV from drainage area violate downstream water rights? X Provide basis: Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) Partial Infeasibility Criteria Yes No 4 Is proposed infiltration facility located on HSG D soils or the site geotechnical investigation identifies presence of soil characteristics which support categorization as D soils? X Provide basis: 5 Is measured infiltration rate below proposed facility less than 0.3 inches per hour? This calculation shall be based on the methods described in Appendix VII. X Provide basis: 6 Would reduction of over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: There is no historical land use to suggest that contaminated groundwater exists in the immediate vicinity of the project. 7 Would an increase in infiltration over predeveloped conditions cause impairments to downstream beneficial uses, such as change of seasonality of ephemeral washes or increased discharge of contaminated groundwater to surface waters? X Provide citation to applicable study and summarize findings relative to the amount of infiltration that is permissible: Based on the geotechnical study performed by Albus Keefe and Associates, no groundwater was encountered to 51.5 bgs during site-specific borings. Based on the depth of groundwater in the area, increasing infiltration over predeveloped conditions will not result in any adverse effects. Infiltration Screening Results (check box corresponding to result): Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table 2.7: Infiltration BMP Feasibility Worksheet (continued) 8 Is there substantial evidence that infiltration from the project would result in a significant increase in I&I to the sanitary sewer that cannot be sufficiently mitigated? (See Appendix XVII) Provide narrative discussion and supporting evidence: At this time there is no evidence that infiltration will result in an increase in inflow to the sanitary sewer. The proposed drywells will infiltration below utility layers. 9 If any answer from row 1-3 is yes: infiltration of any volume is not feasible within the DMA or equivalent. Provide basis: Infiltration is feasible for the project 10 If any answer from row 4-7 is yes, infiltration is permissible but is not presumed to be feasible for the entire DCV. Criteria for designing biotreatment BMPs to achieve the maximum feasible infiltration and ET shall apply. Provide basis: 11 If all answers to rows 1 through 11 are no, infiltration of the full DCV is potentially feasible, BMPs must be designed to infiltrate the full DCV to the maximum extent practicable. Full infiltration is feasible for the project X Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria 1 Is project large or small? (as defined by Table VIII.2) circle one Large Small 2 What is the tributary area to the BMP? A acres 3 What type of BMP is proposed? 4 What is the infiltrating surface area of the proposed BMP? A BMP sq-ft 5 What land use activities are present in the tributary area (list all) Residential, commercial/retail, parking lots 6 What land use-based risk category is applicable? L M H 7 If M or H, what pretreatment and source isolation BMPs have been considered and are proposed (describe all): Pre-treatment will be provided, targeting trash, debris, sediment and hydrocarbons prior to infiltration. Further details will be provided in the Final WQMP. 8 What minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater applies to the proposed BMP? See Section VIII.2 (circle one) 5 ft 10 ft 9 Provide rationale for selection of applicable minimum separation to seasonally high mounded groundwater: 10 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to seasonally high groundwater? SHGWT >50 ft 11 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to mounded seasonally high groundwater? Mounded SHGWT >50 ft 12 Describe assumptions and methods used for mounding analysis: Groundwater depth per geotechnical study in Appendix F. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria 13 Is the site within a plume protection boundary (See Figure VIII.2)? Y N N/A 14 Is the site within a selenium source area or other natural plume area (See Figure VIII.2)? Y N N/A 15 Is the site within 250 feet of a contaminated site? Y N N/A 16 If site-specific study has been prepared, provide citation and briefly summarize relevant findings: A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the project site in 2017. The Phase II investigation consisted of a geophysical survey of the site as well as soil sampling. None of the analyzed soil samples contained detectable concentrations of TPH-cc or PCBs above the laboratory practical quantification limits (PQLs), and the PQLs did not exceed the Maximum Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) or Residential Screening Levels (RSLs). Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were detected in two of the analyzed soil samples (B1-5 and B7-5) at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs. The detected concentrations were below the residential and commercial/industrial RSLs. The remaining VOCs were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples at concentrations exceeding the laboratory PQLs, and the PQLs did not exceed residential or commercial/industrial RSLs. Although the report noted a de minimus release of petroleum hydrocarbons to the subsurface in the vicinity of the two older clarifiers onsite, it does not appear to be a concern to human health or the environment at this time and will be removed according to state and/or local regulations upon redevelopment of the property. 17 Is the site within 100 feet of a water supply well, spring, septic system? Y N N/A 18 Is infiltration feasible on the site relative to groundwater- related criteria? Y N Provide rationale for feasibility determination: Since the proposed infiltration BMPs will not be located in the vicinity of the former USTs or clarifiers on- site, infiltration of runoff is not expected to impact groundwater quality. In addition, infiltration will occur via drywells, with the majority of infiltration occurring below a depth of 18 feet below ground surface (see Appendix F for details), well below the locations of where previous contaminates were observed. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table VIII.1: Recommendations/Requirements for BMP Selection to Minimize Groundwater Quality Impacts Tributary Area Risk Category Narrative Description of Category Example Land Use Activities BMP Selection Requirements Low Runoff Contamination Potential BMP receives runoff from a mix of land covers that are expected to have relatively clean runoff; significant spills in tributary area are unlikely. Rooftops with roofing material and downspouts free of copper and zinc Patios, sidewalks, and other pedestrian areas Mixed residential land uses with applicable source controls Institutional land uses with applicable source controls Driveways and minor streets Any infiltration BMP type may be used Pretreatment for sediment is strongly recommended, as applicable, to mitigate clogging Moderate Runoff Contamination Potential BMP receives runoff from a mix of land covers, more than 10 percent of which have the potential to generate stormwater pollutants at levels that could potentially contaminate groundwater; there is potential for minor spills in the tributary area. Roadways greater than 5,000 ADT but less than 25,000 ADT Commercial and institutional parking lots Commercial land uses Light industrial that does not include usage of chemicals that are mobile in stormwater and groundwater Trash storage areas Any infiltration BMP type may be used Pretreatment shall be used The type of pretreatment shall be selected to address potential groundwater contaminants potentially found in stormwater runoff. High Runoff Contamination Potential BMP receives runoff from a mix of land covers, more than 10 percent of which have significant unavoidable potential to generate stormwater pollutants in quantities that could be detrimental to groundwater quality; and/or there is significant potential for major spills that could drain to BMPs. Roads greater than 25,000 ADT Heavy and light industrial pollutant source areas, including areas with exposed industrial activity and high use industrial truck traffic, and any areas that cannot be isolated these areas. Does not include lower risk source sources areas within industrial zones (e.g., roofs, offices, and parking areas) that are hydrologically isolated from industrial pollutant source areas Automotive repair shops Car washes Fleet storage areas Nurseries, agriculture, and heavily managed landscape areas with extensive use of fertilizer Fueling stations (infiltration prohibited under all conditions) Infiltration is prohibited unless advanced pretreatment and spill isolation can be feasibly used and enhanced monitoring and inspection are implemented. Large projects* must evaluate feasibility of advanced pretreatment and spill isolation. Small projects may consider infiltration to be infeasible with narrative discussion * See Table VII.2 for definition of “Large” and “Small” projects. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table VIII.2: Definition of Project Site Categories Residential Commercial, Institutional Industrial Small Projects Less than 10 acres and less than 30 DU Less than 5 acres and less than 50,000 SF Less than 2 acres and less than 20,000 SF Large Projects Greater than 10 acres or greater than 30 DU Greater than 5 acres or greater than 50,000 SF Greater than 2 acres or greater than 20,000 SF VIII.2. Depth to Groundwater and Mounding Potential Minimum separation between the infiltrating surface (bottom of infiltration facility) and seasonally high mounded groundwater shall be observed in the design of infiltration BMPs, depending on BMP type. • If the depth to unmounded seasonally high groundwater is greater than 15 feet, the depth to groundwater does not constrain infiltration • If separation to unmounded seasonally high groundwater is greater than 10-feet and the infiltration area is less than 2,000 sq-ft, the depth to groundwater does not constrain infiltration. • The separation between the infiltrating surface and the seasonally high mounded groundwater table shall not be less than 5 feet for all BMP types. BMPs for which 5-foot minimum separation applies include: o Rain gardens and dispersion trenches (small, residential applications) o Bioretention and planters o Permeable Pavement o Similar BMPs infiltrating over an extensive surface area and providing robust pretreatment or embedded treatment processes. • Separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater shall be at least 10 feet for infiltration devices that inject water below the subsurface and surface infiltration BMPs with tributary area and land use activities that are considered to pose a more significant risk to groundwater quality. BMPs for which the 10-foot separation applies include: o Dry wells o Subsurface infiltration galleries or vaults o Surface Infiltration Basins o Infiltration Trenches o Other functionally similar devices or BMPs. © 2007 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Project Summary Date:7/12/2018 Project Name:1600 W Lincoln City / County:Anaheim/Orange State:CA Designed By: Company:Enter Information in Telephone:Blue Cells Corrugated Metal Pipe Calculator Storage Volume Required (cf):3,310 Limiting Width (ft):10.00 Effective Depth Below Asphalt (ft):10.00 Solid or Perforated Pipe:Solid Shape Or Diameter:72 28.27 ft2 Pipe Area Spacing between Barrels (ft):3.00 Stone Width Around Perimeter of System (ft):0 Depth A: Porous Stone Above Pipe (in):0 Depth C: Porous Stone Below Pipe (in):0 Stone Porosity (0 to 40%):0 System Sizing Use Custom Layout (at right) for layout adjustment Custom Layout Pipe Storage:3,336 cf To adjust layout, enter desired barrel length in the light blue boxes below. Porous Stone Storage:0 cf Excess Footage = 0 Total Storage Provided:3,336 cf 100.8%Of Required Storage Number of Barrels:1 barrels Barrel 12 0 Number Of Barrels Exceed Graph LimitationsLength Per Barrel:118.00 ft Barrel 11 0 Rectangular Footprint (W x L):6. ft x 118. ft Barrel 10 0 Barrel 9 0 CONTECH Materials Barrel 8 0 Total CMP Footage:118 ft Barrel 7 0 Approximate Total Pieces:5 pcs Barrel 6 0 Approximate Coupling Bands:4 bands Barrel 5 0 Approximate Truckloads:3 trucks Barrel 4 0 Construction Quantities**Barrel 3 0 Total Excavation:263 cy Barrel 2 0 Porous Stone Backfill For Storage:0 cy Stone Barrel 1 118 Backfill to Grade Excluding Stone:139 cy Fill **Construction quantities are approximate and should be verified upon final design 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 140120100806040200 For design assistance,drawings, and pricing send completed worksheet to: dyods@contech-cpi.com © 2007 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Project Summary Date:7/12/2018 Project Name:1600 W Lincoln City / County:Anaheim/Orange State:CA Designed By: Company:Enter Information in Telephone:Blue Cells Corrugated Metal Pipe Calculator Storage Volume Required (cf):8,000 Limiting Width (ft):20.00 Effective Depth Below Asphalt (ft):7.00 Solid or Perforated Pipe:Solid Shape Or Diameter:72 28.27 ft2 Pipe Area Spacing between Barrels (ft):3.00 Stone Width Around Perimeter of System (ft):0 Depth A: Porous Stone Above Pipe (in):0 Depth C: Porous Stone Below Pipe (in):0 Stone Porosity (0 to 40%):0 System Sizing Use Custom Layout (at right) for layout adjustment Custom Layout Pipe Storage:8,030 cf To adjust layout, enter desired barrel length in the light blue boxes below. Porous Stone Storage:0 cf Excess Footage = 0 Total Storage Provided:8,030 cf 100.4%Of Required Storage Number of Barrels:2 barrels Barrel 12 0 Number Of Barrels Exceed Graph LimitationsLength Per Barrel:142.00 ft Barrel 11 0 Rectangular Footprint (W x L):15. ft x 142. ft Barrel 10 0 Barrel 9 0 CONTECH Materials Barrel 8 0 Total CMP Footage:284 ft Barrel 7 0 Approximate Total Pieces:12 pcs Barrel 6 0 Approximate Coupling Bands:10 bands Barrel 5 0 Approximate Truckloads:6 trucks Barrel 4 0 Construction Quantities**Barrel 3 0 Total Excavation:553 cy Barrel 2 142 Porous Stone Backfill For Storage:0 cy Stone Barrel 1 142 Backfill to Grade Excluding Stone:256 cy Fill **Construction quantities are approximate and should be verified upon final design 142 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 160140120100806040200 For design assistance,drawings, and pricing send completed worksheet to: dyods@contech-cpi.com © 2007 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Project Summary Date:7/12/2018 Project Name:1600 W Lincoln City / County:Anaheim/Orange State:CA Designed By: Company:Enter Information in Telephone:Blue Cells Corrugated Metal Pipe Calculator Storage Volume Required (cf):1,300 Limiting Width (ft):10.00 Effective Depth Below Asphalt (ft):10.00 Solid or Perforated Pipe:Solid Shape Or Diameter:72 28.27 ft2 Pipe Area Spacing between Barrels (ft):3.00 Stone Width Around Perimeter of System (ft):0 Depth A: Porous Stone Above Pipe (in):0 Depth C: Porous Stone Below Pipe (in):0 Stone Porosity (0 to 40%):0 System Sizing Use Custom Layout (at right) for layout adjustment Custom Layout Pipe Storage:1,301 cf To adjust layout, enter desired barrel length in the light blue boxes below. Porous Stone Storage:0 cf Excess Footage = 0 Total Storage Provided:1,301 cf 100.0%Of Required Storage Number of Barrels:1 barrels Barrel 12 0 Number Of Barrels Exceed Graph LimitationsLength Per Barrel:46.00 ft Barrel 11 0 Rectangular Footprint (W x L):6. ft x 46. ft Barrel 10 0 Barrel 9 0 CONTECH Materials Barrel 8 0 Total CMP Footage:46 ft Barrel 7 0 Approximate Total Pieces:2 pcs Barrel 6 0 Approximate Coupling Bands:1 bands Barrel 5 0 Approximate Truckloads:1 trucks Barrel 4 0 Construction Quantities**Barrel 3 0 Total Excavation:103 cy Barrel 2 0 Porous Stone Backfill For Storage:0 cy Stone Barrel 1 46 Backfill to Grade Excluding Stone:55 cy Fill **Construction quantities are approximate and should be verified upon final design 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50403020100 For design assistance,drawings, and pricing send completed worksheet to: dyods@contech-cpi.com ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 2 a _ H y d r o S o i l s _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGURE XVI-2aJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP02/09/11 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY INFILTRATION STUDY ORANGE CO.CANRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUPS SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N Source: Soils: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Soil Survey - soil_ca678, Orange County & Western Riverside Date of publication: 2006-02-08 !I 03 . 6 7 . 2 1. 8 Mi l e s 05 1 0 2. 5 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND City Boundaries Hydrologic Soil Groups A Soils B Soils C Soils D Soils http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm PR O J E C T S I T E P: \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ S u c e p t a b i l i t y M a p s _ 2 0 1 0 0 5 0 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ S a n G a b r i e l C o y o t e C r e e k S u s c e p t i b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 0 0 4 3 0 . m x d Anaheim Bay-Huntington HarborWatershed Newport Bay-Newport CoastalStreams Watershed Santa River Watershed Los Angeles County Channel inRetarding Basin Los AlamitosNaval AirStation Seal BeachNaval WeaponsStation FullertonAirport HillcrestParkReservoir OrangeCounty La JollaRechargeBasin KraemerBasin FullertonReservoir FullertonReservoirBrea CreekReservior HumbleReservoir ValenciaReservoir FullertonReservoir MillerRetardingBasin CypressRetardingBasin Los AlamitosRetardingBasin PlacentiaRetardingBasin RaymondRetardingBasin GilbertRetardingBasin CrescentRetardingBasin Loftus DiversionChannelDesilting Basin RossmoorRetardingBasin 1 JO B TI T L E SC A L E 1" = 8 0 0 0 ' DE S I G N E D DR A W I N G CH E C K E D BM P 04 / 3 0 / 1 0 DA T E JO B N O . 95 2 6 - E THTH OR A N G E C O U N T Y WA T E R S H E D MA S T E R P L A N N I N G OR A N G E C O . CA SU S C E P T I B I L I T Y A N A L Y I S SA N G A B R I E L - C O Y O T E C R E E K !I 0 8,000 16,000Feet Susceptibility Potential Areas of Erosion, Habitat, &Physical Structure Susceptibility Channel Type Earth (Unstable) Earth (Stabilized) Stabilized Tidel Influence <= Mean High Water Line (4.28') Water Body Basin Lake Reservoir Other Lands Airport/Military SUSCEPTIBILITY MAP UPATE (FEB 2013) PROJECT SITE ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y RIVE R S I D E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y ORA N G E C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y SAN B E R N A R D I N O C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y OR A N G E C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y LO S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y O R A N G E C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y L O S A N G E L E S C O U N T Y 1. 0 5 0. 7 1 0.95 0.9 0.85 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.95 0 . 7 0 . 9 0. 9 0.75 P : \ 9 5 2 6 E \ 6 - G I S \ M x d s \ R e p o r t s \ I n f i l t r a t i o n F e a s a b i l i t y _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 \ 9 5 2 6 E _ F i g u r e X V I - 1 _ R a i n f a l l Z o n e s _ 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 5 . m x d FIGUREJOBTITLESCALE1" = 1.8 miles DESIGNED DRAWING CHECKEDBMP04/22/10 DATE JOB NO.9526-E TH THORANGE COUNTY TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ORANGE CO.CARAINFALL ZONES SU B J E C T T O F U R T H E R R E V I S I O N 03 . 6 7 . 2 1. 8 Mi l e s 06 1 2 3 Ki l o m e t e r s LEGEND Orange County Precipitation Stations 24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches)24 Hour, 85th Percentile Rainfall (Inches) - Extrapolated City Boundaries Rainfall Zones Design Capture Storm Depth (inches)0.65"0.7 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.10"Note: Events defined as 24-hour periods (calendar days) with greater than 0.1 inches of rainfall. For areas outside of available data coverage, professional judgment shall be applied.XVI-1 PR O J E C T S I T E APPENDIX B NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF RESPONSIBILITY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1600 W Lincoln APN 250-091-09, 10, & 11 Submission of this Notice Of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City of Anaheim that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”) for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/her agent) of the site (or a portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Previous Owner/ Previous Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual Name: Contact Person: Street Address: Title: City: State: ZIP: Phone: II. Information about Site Transferred Name of Project (if applicable): Title of WQMP Applicable to site: Street Address of Site (if applicable): Planning Area (PA) and/ or Tract Number(s) for Site: Lot Numbers (if Site is a portion of a tract): Date WQMP Prepared (and revised if applicable): III. New Owner/ New Responsible Party Information Company/ Individual Name: Contact Person: Street Address: Title: City: State: ZIP: Phone: IV. Ownership Transfer Information General Description of Site Transferred to New Owner: General Description of Portion of Project/ Parcel Subject to WQMP Retained by Owner (if any): Lot/ Tract Numbers of Site Transferred to New Owner: Remaining Lot/ Tract Numbers Subject to WQMP Still Held by Owner (if any): Date of Ownership Transfer: Note: When the Previous Owner is transferring a Site that is a portion of a larger project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP, as opposed to the entire project/parcel addressed by the WQMP, the General Description of the Site transferred and the remainder of the project/ parcel no transferred shall be set forth as maps attached to this notice. These maps shall show those portions of a project/ parcel addressed by the WQMP that are transferred to the New Owner (the Transferred Site), those portions retained by the Previous Owner, and those portions previously transferred by Previous Owner. Those portions retained by Previous Owner shall be labeled as “Previously Transferred”. V. Purpose of Notice of Transfer The purposes of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility are: 1) to track transfer of responsibility for implementation and amendment of the WQMP when property to which the WQMP is transferred from the Previous Owner to the New Owner, and 2) to facilitate notification to a transferee of property subject to a WQMP that such New Order is now the Responsible Party of record for the WQMP for those portions of the site that it owns. VI. Certifications A. Previous Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am no longer the owner of the Transferred Site as described in Section II above. I have provided the New Owner with a copy of the WQMP applicable to the Transferred Site that the New Owner is acquiring from the Previous Owner. Printed Name of Previous Owner Representative: Title: Signature of Previous Owner Representative: Date: B. New Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am the owner of the Transferred Site, as described in Section II above, that I have been provided a copy of the WQMP, and that I have informed myself and understand the New Owner’s responsibilities related to the WQMP, its implementation, and Best Management Practices associated with it. I understand that by signing this notice, the New Owner is accepting all ongoing responsibilities for implementation and amendment of the WQMP for the Transferred Site, which the New Owner has acquired from the Previous Owner. Printed Name of New Owner Representative: Title: Signature: Date: APPENDIX C EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Household Tips Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle Waste Oil in North OC Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Responsible Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Protecting your Watershed DF-1 Drainage System Maintenance R-5 Proper Pet Waste Removal R-6 Disposal of Green Waste R-8 Water Conservation SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning SD-12 Efficient Irrigation SD-13 Storm Drain Signage Resident Educational Materials can be found here: http://www.ocwatersheds.com/publiced/resources/resbrochures Municipal Activity Educational Materials can be found here: http://www.ocwatersheds.com/documents/bmp/municipalactivities Residential Activity Educational Materials can be found here: http://www.ocwatersheds.com/documents/bmp/residentialactivities Storm Drain Educational Materials can be found here: http://www.ocwatersheds.com/documents/bmp/newdevsignificantredev APPENDIX D BMP MAINTENANCE SUPPLEMENT / O&M PLAN OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) PLAN Water Quality Management Plan For 1600 W Lincoln 1600 W Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 APN 250-091-09, 10, & 11 This page intentionally left blank O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 3 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility NON-STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs Yes N1. Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Educational materials will be provided to tenants annually. Materials to be distributed are found in Appendix C. Tenants will be provided these materials by the HOA prior to occupancy and periodically thereafter. Frequency: Annually Owner Yes N2. Activity Restrictions The owner and/or developer will prescribe activity restrictions to protect surface water quality, through lease terms or other equally effective measure, for the property. Restrictions include, but are not limited to, prohibiting vehicle maintenance or vehicle washing. Frequency: Ongoing Owner O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 4 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Yes N3. Common Area Landscape Management Maintenance shall be consistent with City requirements. Fertilizer and/or pesticide usage shall be consistent with County Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers (OC DAMP Section 5.5) as well as local requirements. Maintenance includes mowing, weeding, and debris removal on a weekly basis. Trimming, replanting, and replacement of mulch shall be performed on an as-needed basis to prevent exposure of erodible surfaces. Trimmings, clippings, and other landscape wastes shall be properly disposed of in accordance with local regulations. Materials temporarily stockpiled during maintenance activities shall be placed away from water courses and storm drain inlets. Frequency: Monthly Owner Yes N4. BMP Maintenance Maintenance of structural BMPs implemented at the project site shall be performed at the frequency prescribed in the O&M Plan included in this WQMP (Appendix D). Records of inspections and BMP maintenance shall be kept by the owner/developer and shall be available for review upon request. Frequency: Ongoing Owner No N5. Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply)Not Applicable No N6. Local Industrial Permit Compliance Not Applicable O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 5 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility No N7. Spill Contingency Plan Not Applicable No N8. Underground Storage Tank Compliance Not Applicable No N9. Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance Not Applicable No N10. Uniform Fire Code Implementation Not Applicable Yes N11. Common Area Litter Control Litter patrol, violations investigations, reporting and other litter control activities shall be performed on a weekly basis and in conjunction with routine maintenance activities. Frequency: Weekly Owner Yes N12. Employee Training Educate all new employees/ managers on storm water pollution prevention, particularly good housekeeping practices, prior to the start of the rainy season (October 1). Refresher courses shall be conducted on an as needed basis. Frequency: Annually Owner No N13. Housekeeping of Loading Docks Not Applicable Yes N14. Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Catch basin inlets and other drainage facilities shall be inspected after each storm event and once per year. Storm drain inlets and other drainage facilities shall be cleaned prior to the rainy season, by October 1 each year. Frequency: Annually Owner O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 6 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Yes N15. Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Private streets and parking lots will be swept on a quarterly basis, at minimum. Frequency: Quarterly Owner N16. Retail Gasoline Outlets Not Applicable STRUCTURAL SOURCE CONTROL BMPs Yes S1. Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage Storm drain stencils shall be inspected for legibility, at minimum, once prior to the storm season, no later than October 1 each year. Those determined to be illegible will be re- stenciled as soon as possible. Frequency: Annually Owner No S2. Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Not Applicable No S3. Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Not Applicable O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 7 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Yes S4. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control In conjunction with routine maintenance activities, verify that landscape design continues to function properly by adjusting properly to eliminate overspray to hardscape areas, and to verify that irrigation timing and cycle lengths are adjusted in accordance with water demands, given time of year, weather, and day or night time temperatures. System testing shall occur twice per year. Water from testing/flushing shall be collected and properly disposed to the sewer system and shall not discharge to the storm drain system. Frequency: 2x per year Owner No S5. Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation Not Applicable No S6. Dock areas Not Applicable No S7. Maintenance bays Not Applicable No S8. Vehicle wash areas Not Applicable No S9. Outdoor processing areas Not Applicable No S10. Equipment wash areas Not Applicable No S11. Fueling areas Not Applicable No S12. Hillside landscaping Not Applicable O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 8 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility No S13. Wash water control for food preparation areas Not Applicable No S14. Community car wash racks Not Applicable O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 9 of 13 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT BMPs Infiltration BMP # 1: Maxwell Plus Drywell (or similar) Performed in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. Typical maintenance includes conducting routine inspections for accumulation and cleaning/pollutant removal as necessary from the pre-treatment settling chamber. Quarterly inspections will help maintain optimal performance and to determine typical accumulation levels during both dry-weather and wet-weather flows. The pretreatment settling chamber shall be cleaned when sediment accumulation is at or above the “cleanout line” marked inside of the chamber, and at a minimum of once per year, prior to the start of the storm season. Care should be taken to prevent spills during pollutant removal and cleaning. Oil and other hydrocarbons shall be cleaned out of the settling chamber as needed, once per year at a minimum. See attached for additional maintenance information provided by the manufacturer. Frequency: 2X per year Owner O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 11 of 14 BMP INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Pre-Treatment BMP # 1 Contech StormFilter System To ensure the functionality of the StormFilter Unit, monitoring and maintenance measures for the project will include: ▪ During the rainy season (October 1 to April 30), the unit should be inspected monthly or prior to a target storm, and annually in May, and cleaned out once per year at a minimum ▪ More frequent inspection throughout the first year of installation are essential to determine the annual loading patterns and confirm suggested maintenance schedule. ▪ Cartridges should be replaced on an as- needed basis, typically every 2 to 3 years. ▪ Manufacturer’s specifications may recommend additional maintenance. Frequency: Per Manufacturer Recommendation Owner O PERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE P LAN Page 11 of 13 Required Permits Permits are not required for the implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. Forms to Record BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection The form that will be used to record implementation, maintenance, and inspection of BMPs is attached. Recordkeeping All records must be maintained for at least five (5) years and must be made available for review upon request. Waste Management Any waste generated from maintenance activities will be disposed of properly. Wash water and other waste from maintenance activities is not to be discharged or disposed of into the storm drain system. Clippings from landscape maintenance (i.e. prunings) will be collected and disposed of properly off- site, and will not be washed into the streets, local area drains/conveyances, or catch basin inlets. RECORD OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, AND INSPECTION Today’s Date: Name of Person Performing Activity (Printed): Signature: BMP Name (As Shown in O&M Plan) Brief Description of Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Activity Performed RECORD OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, AND INSPECTION Today’s Date: Name of Person Performing Activity (Printed): Signature: BMP Name (As Shown in O&M Plan) Brief Description of Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Activity Performed OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF MaxWell® DRYWELL The Operation and Maintenance Format will include the following key components: 1.) Inspection Guidelines: New installations Newly installed systems should receive a thorough visual examination following the first several significant rainfall events. This assessment will assure that there is no standing water, and that runoff or nuisance water flows are being eliminated within the allowable 48 hour draw-down timeframe. Ongoing Operations At a minimum, the drainage structures should be inspected annually, and within 48 hours following a significant storm event to ensure that there is no standing water in the chambers. 2.) Maintenance Format: After the first 12-months of entering service, it is recommended that an initial cleaning be undertaken. This will help to establish the amount of accumulated particulate matter and debris to be expected on a yearly basis. Thereafter, the systems should receive inspection at least annually, and cleaning should be undertaken when the evaluation reveals that 15% or more of the original chamber volume is occupied by silt and sediment. During the maintenance operation, all screens and filters should be serviced and the floating absorbent blankets replaced, along with the geo-textile fabric at the bottom of the chambers. Should repair be needed, descriptions of deficiencies and estimated costs for suggested corrections should be provided. The above information shall be submitted in writing to the Owner at the conclusion of the maintenance service. Replacement is recommended for drywells that no longer dispose of ponded water within 48 hours after cleaning. 3.) Maintenance Records: A written log shall be kept on-site of all inspections and maintenance performed on the drainage systems. StormFilter Inspection and Maintenance Procedures ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS In addition to these two activities, it is important to check the condition of the StormFilter unit after major storms for potential damage caused by high flows and for high sediment accumulation that may be caused by localized erosion in the drainage area. It may be necessary to adjust the inspection/ maintenance schedule depending on the actual operating conditions encountered by the system. In general, inspection activities can be conducted at any time, and maintenance should occur, if warranted, during dryer months in late summer to early fall. Maintenance Frequency The primary factor for determining frequency of maintenance for the StormFilter is sediment loading. A properly functioning system will remove solids from water by trapping particulates in the porous structure of the filter media inside the cartridges. The flow through the system will naturally decrease as more and more particulates are trapped. Eventually the flow through the cartridges will be low enough to require replacement. It may be possible to extend the usable span of the cartridges by removing sediment from upstream trapping devices on a routine as-needed basis, in order to prevent material from being re-suspended and discharged to the StormFilter treatment system. The average maintenance lifecycle is approximately 1-5 years. Site conditions greatly influence maintenance requirements. StormFilter units located in areas with erosion or active construction may need to be inspected and maintained more often than those with fully stabilized surface conditions. Regulatory requirements or a chemical spill can shift maintenance timing as well. The maintenance frequency may be adjusted as additional monitoring information becomes available during the inspection program. Areas that develop known problems should be inspected more frequently than areas that demonstrate no problems, particularly after major storms. Ultimately, inspection and maintenance activities should be scheduled based on the historic records and characteristics of an individual StormFilter system or site. It is recommended that the site owner develop a database to properly manage StormFilter inspection and maintenance programs.. 2 3 Maintenance Guidelines The primary purpose of the Stormwater Management StormFilter® is to filter and prevent pollutants from entering our waterways. Like any effective filtration system, periodically these pollutants must be removed to restore the StormFilter to its full efficiency and effectiveness. Maintenance requirements and frequency are dependent on the pollutant load characteristics of each site. Maintenance activities may be required in the event of a chemical spill or due to excessive sediment loading from site erosion or extreme storms. It is a good practice to inspect the system after major storm events. Maintenance Procedures Although there are many effective maintenance options, we believe the following procedure to be efficient, using common equipment and existing maintenance protocols. The following two-step procedure is recommended:: 1. Inspection • Inspection of the vault interior to determine the need for maintenance. 2. Maintenance • Cartridge replacement • Sediment removal Inspection and Maintenance Timing At least one scheduled inspection should take place per year with maintenance following as warranted. First, an inspection should be done before the winter season. During the inspection the need for maintenance should be determined and, if disposal during maintenance will be required, samples of the accumulated sediments and media should be obtained. Second, if warranted, a maintenance (replacement of the filter cartridges and removal of accumulated sediments) should be performed during periods of dry weather. 2 3 Inspection Procedures The primary goal of an inspection is to assess the condition of the cartridges relative to the level of visual sediment loading as it relates to decreased treatment capacity. It may be desirable to conduct this inspection during a storm to observe the relative flow through the filter cartridges. If the submerged cartridges are severely plugged, then typically large amounts of sediments will be present and very little flow will be discharged from the drainage pipes. If this is the case, then maintenance is warranted and the cartridges need to be replaced. Warning: In the case of a spill, the worker should abort inspection activities until the proper guidance is obtained. Notify the local hazard control agency and Contech Engineered Solutions immediately. To conduct an inspection: Important: Inspection should be performed by a person who is familiar with the operation and configuration of the StormFilter treatment unit. 1. If applicable, set up safety equipment to protect and notify surrounding vehicle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 3. Open the access portals to the vault and allow the system vent. 4. Without entering the vault, visually inspect the inside of the unit, and note accumulations of liquids and solids. 5. Be sure to record the level of sediment build-up on the floor of the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the cartridges. If flow is occurring, note the flow of water per drainage pipe. Record all observations. Digital pictures are valuable for historical documentation. 6. Close and fasten the access portals. 7. Remove safety equipment. 8. If appropriate, make notes about the local drainage area relative to ongoing construction, erosion problems, or high loading of other materials to the system. 9. Discuss conditions that suggest maintenance and make decision as to weather or not maintenance is needed. Maintenance Decision Tree The need for maintenance is typically based on results of the inspection. The following Maintenance Decision Tree should be used as a general guide. (Other factors, such as Regulatory Requirements, may need to be considered) 1. Sediment loading on the vault floor. a. If >4” of accumulated sediment, maintenance is required. 2. Sediment loading on top of the cartridge. a. If >1/4” of accumulation, maintenance is required. 3. Submerged cartridges. a. If >4” of static water above cartridge bottom for more than 24 hours after end of rain event, maintenance is required. (Catch basins have standing water in the cartridge bay.) 4. Plugged media. a. If pore space between media granules is absent, maintenance is required. 5. Bypass condition. a. If inspection is conducted during an average rain fall event and StormFilter remains in bypass condition (water over the internal outlet baffle wall or submerged cartridges), maintenance is required. 6. Hazardous material release. a. If hazardous material release (automotive fluids or other) is reported, maintenance is required. 7. Pronounced scum line. a. If pronounced scum line (say ≥ 1/4” thick) is present above top cap, maintenance is required. Important: Care must be used to avoid damaging the cartridges during removal and installation. The cost of repairing components damaged during maintenance will be the responsibility of the owner. C. Set the used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. D. Continue steps a through c until all cartridges have been removed. Method 2: A. This activity will require that maintenance personnel enter the vault to remove the cartridges from the under drain manifold and place them under the vault opening for lifting (removal). Disconnect each filter cartridge from the underdrain connector by rotating counterclockwise 1/4 of a turn. Roll the loose cartridge, on edge, to a convenient spot beneath the vault access. B. Unscrew the cartridge cap. C. Remove the cartridge hood and float. D. At location under structure access, tip the cartridge on its side. E. Empty the cartridge onto the vault floor. Reassemble the empty cartridge. F. Set the empty, used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. G. Continue steps a through e until all cartridges have been removed. 4 5 Maintenance Depending on the configuration of the particular system, maintenance personnel will be required to enter the vault to perform the maintenance. Important: If vault entry is required, OSHA rules for confined space entry must be followed. Filter cartridge replacement should occur during dry weather. It may be necessary to plug the filter inlet pipe if base flows is occurring. Replacement cartridges can be delivered to the site or customers facility. Information concerning how to obtain the replacement cartridges is available from Contech Engineered Solutions. Warning: In the case of a spill, the maintenance personnel should abort maintenance activities until the proper guidance is obtained. Notify the local hazard control agency and Contech Engineered Solutions immediately. To conduct cartridge replacement and sediment removal maintenance: 1. If applicable, set up safety equipment to protect maintenance personnel and pedestrians from site hazards. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 3. Open the doors (access portals) to the vault and allow the system to vent. 4. Without entering the vault, give the inside of the unit, including components, a general condition inspection. 5. Make notes about the external and internal condition of the vault. Give particular attention to recording the level of sediment build-up on the floor of the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the internal components. 6. Using appropriate equipment offload the replacement cartridges (up to 150 lbs. each) and set aside. 7. Remove used cartridges from the vault using one of the following methods: Method 1: A. This activity will require that maintenance personnel enter the vault to remove the cartridges from the under drain manifold and place them under the vault opening for lifting (removal). Disconnect each filter cartridge from the underdrain connector by rotating counterclockwise 1/4 of a turn. Roll the loose cartridge, on edge, to a convenient spot beneath the vault access. Using appropriate hoisting equipment, attach a cable from the boom, crane, or tripod to the loose cartridge. Contact Contech Engineered Solutions for suggested attachment devices. B. Remove the used cartridges (up to 250 lbs. each) from the vault. 4 5 8. Remove accumulated sediment from the floor of the vault and from the forebay. This can most effectively be accomplished by use of a vacuum truck. 9. Once the sediments are removed, assess the condition of the vault and the condition of the connectors. 10. Using the vacuum truck boom, crane, or tripod, lower and install the new cartridges. Once again, take care not to damage connections. 11. Close and fasten the door. 12. Remove safety equipment. 13. Finally, dispose of the accumulated materials in accordance with applicable regulations. Make arrangements to return the used empty cartridges to Contech Engineered Solutions. Related Maintenance Activities - Performed on an as-needed basis StormFilter units are often just one of many structures in a more comprehensive stormwater drainage and treatment system. In order for maintenance of the StormFilter to be successful, it is imperative that all other components be properly maintained. The maintenance/repair of upstream facilities should be carried out prior to StormFilter maintenance activities. In addition to considering upstream facilities, it is also important to correct any problems identified in the drainage area. Drainage area concerns may include: erosion problems, heavy oil loading, and discharges of inappropriate materials. Material Disposal The accumulated sediment found in stormwater treatment and conveyance systems must be handled and disposed of in accordance with regulatory protocols. It is possible for sediments to contain measurable concentrations of heavy metals and organic chemicals (such as pesticides and petroleum products). Areas with the greatest potential for high pollutant loading include industrial areas and heavily traveled roads. Sediments and water must be disposed of in accordance with all applicable waste disposal regulations. When scheduling maintenance, consideration must be made for the disposal of solid and liquid wastes. This typically requires coordination with a local landfill for solid waste disposal. For liquid waste disposal a number of options are available including a municipal vacuum truck decant facility, local waste water treatment plant or on-site treatment and discharge. Inspection Report Date: Personnel: Location: ————————————System Size: ——————————————————————————————————— System Type: Vault Cast-In-Place Linear Catch Basin Manhole Other Sediment Thickness in Forebay: ——————————————————————————————————————————— Sediment Depth on Vault Floor: ——————————————————————————————————————————— Structural Damage: ———————————————————————————————————————————————— Estimated Flow from Drainage Pipes (if available): ———————————————————————————————————— Cartridges Submerged: Yes No Depth of Standing Water: —————————————————————— StormFilter Maintenance Activities (check off if done and give description) Trash and Debris Removal: ——————————————————————————————————————————— Minor Structural Repairs: ———————————————————————————————————————————— Drainage Area Report ————————————————————————————————————————————— Excessive Oil Loading: Yes No Source: ——————————————————————— Sediment Accumulation on Pavement: Yes No Source: ——————————————————————— Erosion of Landscaped Areas: Yes No Source: ——————————————————————— Items Needing Further Work: ———————————————————————————————————————————— Owners should contact the local public works department and inquire about how the department disposes of their street waste residuals. Other Comments: ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Review the condition reports from the previous inspection visits. Date: StormFilter Maintenance Report Date: —————————————Personnel: ———————————————————————————————————— Location: ————————————System Size: ——————————————————————————————————— System Type: Vault Cast-In-Place Linear Catch Basin Manhole Other List Safety Procedures and Equipment Used: —————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— System Observations Months in Service: Oil in Forebay (if present): Yes No Sediment Depth in Forebay (if present): ———————————————————————————————————————— Sediment Depth on Vault Floor: ——————————————————————————————————————————— Structural Damage: ———————————————————————————————————————————————— Drainage Area Report Excessive Oil Loading: Yes No Source: ————————————————————————— Sediment Accumulation on Pavement: Yes No Source: ————————————————————————— Erosion of Landscaped Areas: Yes No Source: ————————————————————————— StormFilter Cartridge Replacement Maintenance Activities Remove Trash and Debris: Yes No Details: —————————————————————————— Replace Cartridges: Yes No Details: —————————————————————————— Sediment Removed: Yes No Details: —————————————————————————— Quantity of Sediment Removed (estimate?): Minor Structural Repairs: Yes No Details: ————————————————————————— Residuals (debris, sediment) Disposal Methods: —————————————————————————————————————— Notes: —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— 800.338.1122 www.conteches.com NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN EXPRESSED WARRANT Y OR AN IMPLIED WARRANT Y OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR AN Y PARTICULAR PURPOSE . SEE THE CONTECH STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SALE (VIEWABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM /COS ) FOR MORE INFORMATION . Contech Engineered Solutions LLC provides site solutions for the civil engineering industry. Contech’s portfolio includes bridges, drainage, sanitary sewer, stormwater and earth stabilization products. For information on other Contech division offerings, visit contech-cpi.com or call 800.338.1122. Support • Drawings and specifications are available at www.conteches.com. • Site-specific design support is available from our engineers. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS ©2016 CONTECH ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS LLC. 800-338-1122 www.ContechES.com All Rights Reserved. Printed in the USA. StormFilter Inspection and Maintenance Procedures 8/2016 APPENDIX E CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PENDING ISSUANCE APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT May 8, 2018 J.N.: 2623.00 Mr. Josh Haskins Development Advisors, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Suite 800 Anaheim, California 92806 Subject: Infiltration Study for Proposed Water Quality Improvements, Proposed Multi- Family Residential Development and Parking Structure, 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California. Dear Mr. Haskins, Pursuant to your request, Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. has completed an infiltration study for proposed water quality improvements. The scope of this investigation consisted of the following: Exploratory drilling, soil sampling and test well installation Field percolation testing Laboratory testing of selected soil samples Engineering analysis of the data Preparation of this report SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Site Location and Description The site is located at 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue, within the city of Anaheim, California. The property is irregular in shape and comprises approximately 5.3 acres of land. The location of the site is depicted on Figure 1. The site is currently occupied by an auto dealership with an auto mechanics shop. The site is bordered by West Lincoln Avenue to the north, South Loara Street to the east, Loara Elementary School, a single family residence, and commercial development to the south, and a multi-family residential community to the west. At the time of this evaluation, the southern portion of the site was occupied by two buildings that house an automotive body shop and RV repair facility; the northern portion of the site is currently occupied by a used car dealership. A paved parking lot occupies the remainder of the property. Free standing walls were located along the perimeter of the property except on the northern portion of the site. The north is bordered by planters and sidewalks. The site is relatively level with elevations, based on GoogleEarth 2018, varying from approximately 129 feet above mean sea level (MSL) to 135 feet above MSL. Drainage at the site appears to be directed as sheet flow towards the east within the southern portion of the site and to the north within the norther portion. Vegetation at the site consists of a few palm trees and shrubs along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. © 2017 Google SITE LOCATION MAP N The Olson Company Proposed Multi-Family Residential Development and Parking Structure 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, California NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1 SITE Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 3 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Proposed Development We understand the site will be developed for residential use. We anticipate the proposed site development will consist of 35 three-story townhomes and either a four- or five-story apartment building with a six- to seven-level parking structure. We also anticipate that all proposed structures will be constructed on grade (i.e. no subterranean elements). Associated interior driveways, perimeter/retaining walls, underground utilities and a storm water infiltration system are also anticipated. No grading or structural plans were available in preparing of this report. However, we anticipate that minor rough grading of the site will be required to achieve future surface configuration and we expect the proposed residential dwellings will be wood-framed structures with concrete slabs on grade yielding relatively light foundation loads. The multi-level parking structure is anticipated to be a concrete and masonry block supported by conventional foundations. SUMMARY OF FIELD AND LABORATORY WORK Subsurface Investigation Subsurface exploration for this investigation was conducted on July 18, 2017, and consisted of drilling six (6) soil borings to depths ranging from approximately 15 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted, continuous flight, hollow-stem-auger drill rig. Representatives of Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. logged the exploratory borings. Visual and tactile identifications were made of the materials encountered, and their descriptions are presented in the Exploration Logs in Appendix A. The approximate locations of the exploratory excavations completed by this firm are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Bulk, relatively undisturbed and Standard Penetration Test (SPT) samples were obtained at selected depths within the exploratory borings for subsequent laboratory testing. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a 3-inch O.D., 2.5-inch I.D., California split-spoon soil sampler lined with brass rings. SPT samples were obtained from the boring using a standard, unlined SPT soil sampler. During each sampling interval, the sampler was driven 18 inches with successive drops of a 140-pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler was recorded for each six inches of advancement. The total blow count for the lower 12 inches of advancement per soil sample is recorded on the exploration log. Samples were placed in sealed containers or plastic bags and transported to our laboratory for analyses. The borings were backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion of sampling. Borings B-1 and B-4 were converted into percolation test wells (P-1 and P-2) at the completion of drilling. Two-inch-diameter casings were installed in each boring for subsequent percolation testing. The locations of the percolation wells are depicted on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. Well screens having a length of approximately 10 feet where installed at the bottom of the percolation wells with solid pipe extending the remainder of the distance to the ground surface. The annular space of the well screen sections was filled with sand. Subsequent to completion of testing, the well casings were removed and the boring was refilled with drill cuttings. Percolation Testing Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 4 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation testing was performed on July 18, 2017, in general conformance with the constant-head test procedures outlined in the referenced Well Permeameter Method (USBR 7300-89). A water hose attached to a water source on site was connected to an inline flow meter to measure the water flow. The flow meter is capable of measuring flow rates up to 10 gallons per minute and as low as 0.1 gallons per minute. A valve was connected in line with the flow meter to control the flow rate. A filling hose was used to connect the flow meter and the test wells. Water was introduced by the filling hose near the bottom of the test wells. A water level meter with 1/100-foot divisions was used to measure the depths to water surface from the top of well casings. Flow to the wells was terminated upon either completion of testing of all the pre-determined water levels or the flow rate exceeded the maximum capacity of the flow meter. Measurements obtained during the percolation testing are provided on Plates C-1 and C-2. Laboratory Testing Selected soil samples of representative earth materials were tested to assist in the formulation of conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. Tests consisted of grain-size analysis. Laboratory testing relevant to percolation characteristics are presented in Appendix B. ANALYSIS OF DATA Subsurface Conditions The subsurface soils observed within the site are comprised of up to approximately 4 feet of artificial fill overlying alluvial deposits. The artificial fill is comprised of loose to medium dense silty sand. The alluvial deposits are comprised of loose to dense interlayers of silty sand and sand with variable amounts of gravel. Some discontinuous layers and lenses comprised of sandy silt were occasionally observed within the alluvium. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during this firm’s subsurface explorations to a maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. A review of the CDMG Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03 indicates that historical high groundwater levels for the general site area have been estimated to be greater than 50 feet below the existing ground surface. Based on the referenced Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report for the property, the groundwater depth is inferred to be approximately 100 feet below ground surface (bgs) based on the subsurface investigation conducted on a nearby property (1631 West Lincoln Avenue and Closed Case #083004014T). Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 5 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Percolation Data Analyses were performed to evaluate permeability using the flow rate obtained at the end of the constant-head stage of field percolation testing for the data obtained from percolation test well P-1 and P-2. These analyses were performed in accordance with the procedures provided in the referenced USBR method as presented on Plates C-4 through C-6 and summarized below in Table 1. TABLE 1 Summary of Back-Calculated Permeability Coefficient from Constant Head Test Location Total Depth of Well (ft) Depth to Water in Well (ft) Height of Water in Well (ft) Static Flow Rate (gal./min.) Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr.) P-1 (B-1) 25 20 5 2.0 3.27 P-2 (B-4) 15 13.5 1.5 6.25 68.23 Using the Kozeny-Carman equation, we estimated permeability rates based on laboratory testing consisting of particle-size analyses. The estimated permeability based on correlations with particle- size analyses are summarized in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Estimated Permeability Coefficient Based on Gradation Location USCS Classification Depth (ft) Dry unit weight (pcf) Specific Gravity Estimated Permeability, ks (in/hr) B-1 SM 20 - 2.65 2.71 B-4 SP 10 99.1 2.65 61.6 Design of Dry Well Infiltration in a dry well was modeled using the software Seep/W, version 2007, by Geo-Slope International. The program allows for modeling of both partially-saturated and saturated porous medium using a finite element approach to solve Darcy’s Law. The program can evaluate both steady- state and transient flow in planer and axisymmetric cases. Boundaries of the model can be identified with various conditions including fix total head, fix pressure head, fix flow rate, and head as a function of flow. Soil conductivity properties can be modeled with either Fredlund et al (1994), Green and Corey (1971), or Van Genuchten (1980). The Van Genuchten parameters were selected for use in our models and were based on test results of particle-size analyses and estimated in-place densities. The saturated conductivities for the infiltration zones were selected based on the results obtained from back-calculation of the percolation tests. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 6 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. A Seep/W model was setup with the bottom of the dry well at a depth of 20 feet below ground surface. The total depth of the dry well was assumed to be 6 feet in diameter and contain a settling chamber 18 feet in depth, have an inside diameter of 4 feet, and an outside diameter of 4.5 feet. Annular space around the chamber and below the chamber is assumed to consist of gravel. A more detailed model of the dry well design can be found on Plate 2. The model consisted of three zones of material to represent the general soil profile. The upper zone (Material # 1) was modeled to be relatively impermeable to represent artificial fill and to ignore contributions from this layer. The second zone (Material No. 2) was modeled to represent the poorly- graded sands encountered during our subsurface investigation that extend to the depth of 17 feet near Borings 1 and 4. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back-analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. The conductivity of the bottom zone (Material No. 3) was modeled to represent the interbedded sands and silty sands that were encountered during our subsurface investigation below a depth of 17 feet. The conductivity of this zone is based on the back- analyzed percolation tests as well as results of correlations with lab testing. A summary of the properties for each zone is provided in Table 2. TABLE 2 Summary of Characteristic Curve Parameters Material No. Depth (ft) USCS Ks (in/hr) Van Genuchten Parameters a (1/cm) n m Sat. Water Content Residual Water Content 1 Impermeable Soils 0.001 0.0001 1.22 0.18 0.42 0.01 2 Sand 50.0 59.63 1.25 0.20 0.31 0.025 3 Silty Sand & Sand 3.0 3.00 1.36 0.27 0.33 0.025 Steady state analyses were performed to estimate the maximum inflow that a well can accommodate. The water head was set at 5 feet below the ground surface in the well. Using the well configuration described above, we obtain a peak static total flow of 0.29 ft³/sec. A plot depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors for the model are provided on Plate C-5. To evaluate the time required to empty the well once no more water is introduced, the model was reanalyzed with a variable head condition that was dependent upon the volume of water leaving the well. As water infiltrates into the surrounding soil, the volume of water remaining in the well is reduced as well as the resulting water head. A graph of the well head versus exit volume for the well configuration is provided in Figure 2. The function assumes a void ratio of 0.4 within the zones occupied by gravel. If some other well configuration is used, then the analyses will require updating. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 7 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Figure 2 –Well Head Function The analyses were performed as a transient case over a total time of approximately 4 hours. The water is evacuated from the chamber portion of the well in approximately 3 hours assuming the well utilizes a chamber 18 feet in depth. Plots depicting the resulting pressure head contours and flow vectors at selected times during the drawdown phase is provided in Appendix C on Plates C-6 through C-10. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on results of our testing, infiltration of storm water at the site is feasible using a shallow chamber system such as Stormtech chambers or dry wells. Recommendations pertinent to each type of system is provided below. The use of shallow chamber systems or dry wells is not anticipated to result in worsening any adverse conditions or hazards that may be present for the proposed site development or adjacent properties including subsidence, landsliding, or liquefaction. As discussed above, the groundwater is approximately 100 feet deep and is anticipated to remain below a depth of 50 during the design life of the project. Therefore, chambers systems founded within the upper 10 feet and a dry well having a total depth of 20 will maintain the minimum clearance of 10 feet above groundwater as required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Shallow System The infiltration rate of a shallow chamber system will be dependent upon the depth and width of the system as well as the depth of water contained in the chambers. For purposes of developing an infiltration rate, we have conservatively assumed a negligible ponding depth in the chambers. Since the soil profile consists of a higher permeability layer (SP) over a lower permeability layer (SM), the overall infiltration rate will depend essentially on the vertical clearance of the chamber bottom from the lower SM soil layer and the width of the system. We have assumed the infiltration rate can be 80 85 90 95 100 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 To t a l H e a d ( f t ) Volume (ft3) Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. estimated by using a weight average of the permeabilities of the upper SP layer with a permeability of 50 in/hr. and lower SM layer with a permeability of 3 in/hr. depending upon the depth and width of the system. The weighting is based on the giving full weight to the upper layer when the clearance is 3 times the system width. Where the clearance is less than 3 times the system width, the permeabilities are weighted according to the ratios of the permeabilities to 3 times the system width. The results of weighting of these two factors is summarized in Table 3 below. TABLE 3 Summary of Measured Infiltration Rates for Shallow Chamber Systems Depth to Bottom of Chamber System Width (ft) 6 ft 8 ft 10ft 10 20 in/hr. 17 in/hr. 14 in/hr. 20 12 in/hr. 10 in/hr. 9 in/hr. 30 9 in/hr. 8 in/hr. 7 in/hr. The system width should be based on the total minimum dimension across the chamber area regardless of how many individual chambers are used or the spacing between chambers. The project civil engineer should incorporate an appropriate factor of safety to the measured values indicated in Table 3 to develop the design infiltration rate. Excavation bottoms should be observed by the geotechnical consultant to verify that appropriate soils are present. Any soils that do not meet the anticipated minimum infiltration rate should be excavated and replaced with a granular material that meets or exceeds a permeability rate of 50 in./hr. Such a material may consist of a Caltrans Class II permeable base or other material approved by the geotechnical engineer. Chambers should be placed at least 20 feet horizontally from any building or property line. Once WQMP plans and calculations are developed, they should be reviewed by this office to confirm the intent of this report has been properly incorporated into the project. We also recommend that a representative of this office be present during construction to confirm the exposed soil conditions are as anticipated and to provide recommendations in the event they differ. Dry Well Results of our work indicate a storm water disposal system consisting of dry wells is feasible at the site. Based on results of percolation testing and analyses, a well configuration as depicted on Plate 2 may utilize an unfactored peak flow rate of 0.29 ft³/sec. in proximity to the infiltration test well locations (B-1 and B-4) indicated on Plate 1. An appropriate factor of safety should be applied to the flow rate as required by the governmental authority. Wells with differing diameters or lengths will result in differing infiltration rates. As such, this value should not be used for evaluation of other well configurations. The wells should be located at least 15 feet horizontally from any habitable structure or property line. Should you require multiple dry wells across the site, the wells should be spaced at least 70 feet, center Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 9 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. to center, to avoid cross influence. Provided the recommendations above are incorporated into the design of the drywell, permanent groundwater mounding is not anticipated to occur. The actual flow capacity of the dry well could be more or less than the estimated value. As such, provisions should be made to accommodate excess flow quantities in the event the dry well does not infiltrate the anticipated amount. The design also assumes that sediments will be removed from the inflowing water through an upper chamber or other device. Sediments that are allowed to enter the dry well will tend to degrade the flow capacity by plugging up the infiltration surfaces. In general, the dry well may consist of a concrete inner chamber surrounded by ½-inch open graded gravel. The concrete chamber should have perforations to allow the chamber to drain. The holes should be sized to prevent piping of the gravel into the chamber. A sand/cement slurry should be used as backfill outside the entire diameter of the drilled shaft within the upper 5 feet of the wells to restrict water from entering the upper 5 feet. A general diagram of the dry well is provided on Plate 2. In general, the dry well shaft is anticipated to be prone to sloughing and caving due to the layers of granular materials encountered during the subsurface investigation. We anticipate that casing will be required to install the well. Workers should not enter the shaft unless the excavation is laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements. The placement and compaction of backfill materials, including the gravel should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant. LIMITATIONS This report is based on the geotechnical data as described herein. The materials encountered in our boring excavations and utilized in our laboratory testing for this investigation are believed representative of the project area, and the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are presented on that basis. However, soil and bedrock materials can vary in characteristics between points of exploration, both laterally and vertically, and those variations could affect the conclusions and recommendations contained herein. As such, observations by a geotechnical consultant during the construction phase of the storm water infiltration systems are essential to confirming the basis of this report. This report has been prepared consistent with that level of care being provided by other professionals providing similar services at the same locale and time period. The contents of this report are professional opinions and as such, are not to be considered a guaranty or warranty. This report should be reviewed and updated after a period of one year or if the site ownership or project concept changes from that described herein. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Development Advisors to assist the project consultants in the design of the proposed development. This report has not been prepared for use by parties or projects other than those named or described herein. This report may not contain sufficient information for other parties or other purposes. This report is subject to review by the controlling governmental agency. Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 10 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you should have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Principe David E. Albus Staff Engineer Principal Engineer G.E. 2455 Enclosures: Plate 1- Geotechnical Map Plate 2 – Typical Dry Well Exhibit Appendix A - Exploratory Logs Appendix B - Laboratory Testing Appendix C - Percolation Testing and Analyses Development Advisors, LLC May 8, 2018 J.N. : 2623.00 Page 11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. REFERENCES Publications California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Report 03, “Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles County, California”, 1998. State of California, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim and Newport Beach Quadrangle, dated April 17, 1997. Procedure for Performing Field Permeability Testing by the Well Permeameter Method, by United States Department of The Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR 7300-89). Saxton, K.E., W.J. Rawls, J.S. Romberger, and R.I. Papendick. 1986. Estimating generalized soil- water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50(4):1031-103 Reports Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, 1600 West Lincoln, 1600 West Lincoln Avenue, City of Anaheim, California, prepared by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., dated April 28, 2017 (Partner Project No. 16-177713.1). W. LINCOLN AVE. S. LOARA ST. P R O J E C T L I M I T B - 2 B-3 B - 6 B - 5 B - 1 / P - 1 B - 4 / P - 2 W. PAMPAS LN. A L B U S - K E E F E & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . G E O T E C H N I C A L C O N S U L T A N T S G E O T E C H N I C A L M A P 2 6 2 3 . 0 0 J o b N o . : P l a t e : 1 D a t e : 0 5 / 0 8 / 1 8 Google 2017 E X P L A N A T I O N ( L o c a t i o n s A p p r o x i m a t e ) - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g B - 6 - E x p l o r a t o r y B o r i n g & P e r c o l a t i o n T e s t B o r i n g B - 1 / P - 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 A P P R O X . S C A L E : 1 " = 1 0 0 ' CALCULATINGMAXWELLIVREQUIREMENTS Thetypeofproperty,soilpermeability,rainfallintensityandlocaldrainageordinancesdeterminethenumberanddesignofMaxWellSystems.Forgeneralapplicationsdrainingretained stormwater, use one standard MaxWell IV per the instructions below for up to 3 acres of landscaped contributory area, and up to 1 acre of paved surface. For larger paved surfaces, subdivisiondrainage,nuisancewaterdrainage,connectingpipeslargerthan4"Øfromcatchbasinsorundergroundstorage,orotherdemandingapplications,refertoour MaxWell ®Plus System.Forindustrialdrainage,includinggasolineservicestations,our Envibro®System mayberecommended.Foradditionalconsiderations,pleasereferto “DesignSuggestionsFor RetentionAndDrainageSystems”orconsultourDesignStaff. COMPLETINGTHEMAXWELLIVDRAWING Toapplythe MaxWellIV drawingtoyourspecificproject,simplyfillintheblueboxesperinstructionsbelow.Forassistance,pleaseconsultourDesignStaff. DRAINAGEPIPE Thisdimensionalsoappliestothe PureFlo®DebrisShield,the FloFast®DrainageScreen, and fittings. The size selected is based upon system design rates, soil conditions, and the need for adequate venting. Choices are 6", 8",or 12" diameter. Refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems” for recommendations on which size best matches your application. BOLTEDRING&GRATE Standard models are quality cast iron and available to fit 24" Ø or 30" Ø manhole openings. All units are bolted in two locations with wording “Storm Water Only” in raised letters. For other surface treatments, please refer to “Design Suggestions for Retention and Drainage Systems.” INLET PIPE INVERT Pipesupto4"indiameterfromcatchbasins,undergroundstorage,etc.maybeconnected into the settling chamber. Inverts deeper than 5 feet will require additional settling chamber depth to maintain effective overflow height. "Ø "Ø "Ø ® TORRENT RESOURCES (CA) INCORPORATED phone 661~947~9836 CA Lic.886759 A, C-42 www.TorrentResources.com An evolution of McGuckin Drilling The referenced drawing and specifications are available on CAD either through our office or web site. This detail is copyrighted (2004) but may be used as is in construction plans without further release. For information on product application, individual project specifications or site evaluation, contact our DesignStaffforno-charge assistanceinanyphaseofyourplanning. 1. ManholeCone -ModifiedFlatBottom. 2. MoistureMembrane -6Mil.Plastic.Appliesonlywhen nativematerialisusedforbackfill.Placemembrane securelyagainsteccentricconeandholesidewall. 3. Bolted Ring & Grate - Diameter as shown. Clean cast iron withwording “StormWaterOnly”inraisedletters.Bolted in2locations andsecuredtoconewithmortar.Rimelevation ±0.02'ofplans. 4. GradedBasinorPaving (byOthers). 5. CompactedBaseMaterial - 1-SackSlurryexceptin landscapedinstalltionswithnopipeconnections. 6. PureFlo ®DebrisShield -Rolled16ga.steelX24"length withventedanti-siphonandInternal.265"Max.SWO flattened expanded steel screen X 12" length.Fusion bondedepoxycoated. 7. Pre-castLiner -4000PSIconcrete 48"ID.X54"OD.Center inhole andalignsections tomaximizebearingsurface. 8. Min.6'Ø DrilledShaft. 9. SupportBracket -Formed12Ga.steel.Fusionbonded epoxycoated. 10. OverflowPipe -Sch.40PVCmatedtodrainagepipeat baseseal. 11. DrainagePipe -ADShighwaygradewithTRI-Acoupler. Suspendpipe duringbackfilloperationstoprevent bucklingorbreakage.Diameterasnoted. 12. BaseSeal -Geotextileorconcreteslurry. 13.Rock -Washed,sizedbetween3/8"and1-1/2"to best complementsoilconditions. 14. FloFast ®DrainageScreen -Sch.40PVC0.120"slotted wellscreenwith32slotsperrow/ft.Diametervaries120" overalllengthwithTRI-Bcoupler. 15. Min.4'Ø Shaft -Drilledto maintainpermeability of drainagesoils. 16. FabricSeal -U.V.resistantgeotextile-toberemoved bycustomer atprojectcompletion. 17. Absorbent–HydrophobicPetrochemicalSponge. Min.to128oz.capacity. 18. FreeboardDepth Varieswithinletpipeelevation.Increase settlingchamberdepthasneededtomaintainallinlet pipeelevationsaboveoverflowpipeinlet. 19. Optional Inlet Pipe (Maximum 4", by Others). Extend moisture membraneandcompactedbasematerialor 1sackslurrybackfillbelowpipeinvert. ITEM NUMBERS MAXWELL®IVDRAINAGESYSTEMDETAILANDSPECIFICATIONS Thewatermarkfordrainagesolutions.®1/12 Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 ®Manufactured and Installed by TORRENT RESOURCES An evolution of McGuckin Drilling www.torrentresources.com ARIZONA 602/268-0785 NEVADA 702/366-1234 CALIFORNIA 661/947-9836 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4, ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080, C-42, HAZ. NV Lic. 0035350 A - NM Lic. 90504 GF04 U.S. Patent No. 4,923,330 - TM Trademark 1974, 1990, 2004 ® 114188a:084318a1 1/10/12 8:17 AM Page 2 20 ft 20 f t 20 feet ESTIMATED TOTAL DEPTH The Estimated Total Depth is the approximate depth required to achieve 10 continuous feet of penetration into permeable soils. Torrent utilizes specialized “crowd” equipped drill rigs to penetrate difficult, cemented soils and to reach permeable materials at depths up to 180 feet. Our extensive database of drilling logs and soils information is available for use as a reference. Please contact our Design Staff for site-specific information on your project. 18 feet SETTLING CHAMBER DEPTH On MaxWell IV Systems of over 30 feet overall depth and up to 0.25cfs design rate, the standard Settling Chamber Depth is 18 feet . For systems exposed to greater contributory area than noted above, extreme service conditions, or that require higher design rates, chamber depths up to 25 feet are recommended. ' OVERFLOW HEIGHT The Overflow Height and Settling Chamber Depth determine the effectiveness of the settling process. The higher the overflow pipe, the deeper the chamber, the greater the settling capacity. For normal drainage applications, an overflow height of 13 feet is used with the standard settling chamber depth of 18 feet. Sites with higher design rates than noted above, heavy debris loading or unusual service conditions require greater settling capacities TORRENT RESOURCES INCORPORATED 1509 East Elwood Street, Phoenix Arizona 85040~1391 phone 602~268~0785 fax 602~268~0820 Nevada 702~366~1234 AZ Lic. ROC070465 A, ROC047067 B-4; ADWR 363 CA Lic. 528080 A, C-42, HAZ ~ NV Lic. 0035350 A ~ NM Lic. 90504 GF04 18 ft 15 m i l M E M B R A N E D E P T H ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX A EXPLORATORY LOGS Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G W a t e r C o r e B u l k 5 10 15 20 EXPLANATION Solid lines separate geologic units and/or material types. Dashed lines indicate unknown depth of geologic unit change or material type change. Solid black rectangle in Core column represents California Split Spoon sampler (2.5in ID, 3in OD). Double triangle in core column represents SPT sampler. Solid black rectangle in Bulk column respresents large bag sample. Other Laboratory Tests: Max = Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content EI = Expansion Index SO4 = Soluble Sulfate Content DSR = Direct Shear, Remolded DS = Direct Shear, Undisturbed SA = Sieve Analysis (1" through #200 sieve) Hydro = Particle Size Analysis (SA with Hydrometer) 200 = Percent Passing #200 Sieve Consol = Consolidation SE = Sand Equivalent Rval = R-Value ATT = Atterberg Limits Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/18/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-1 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 25 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inches Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inches ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Brown, damp to moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qoal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, Micaceous, Trace Fine gravel Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp to moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous @ 10 ft, trace fine to coarse gravel, decreased fines Silty Sand (SM): Pale brown, moist, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, Micaceous Boring ended at 25ft. No groundwater was encountered. Boring was converted into percolation test well (P-1) 18 17 18 16 12 11 13 2.5 2.9 8.5 4.8 98.3 101.7 91.9 94 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-1 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch Asphalt Concrete (AC): 2 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 2 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp to moist, loose, fine grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, medium dense, increased fines, few pinhole pores @ 15 ft, loose, decreased fines, grades to sand in tip @ 20 ft, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, decreased fines 13 12 10 11 25.4 22.7 15.3 16.6 95.1 97.6 Dist. 101.1 Consol Consol Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-3 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 35 40 45 @ 25 ft, Sample grades to sandy silt then back to silty sand @ 30 ft, loose Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 40 ft, dense, fine to medium grained sand @ 45 ft, fine to coarse grained sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide stains 14 8 22 26 34 11.5 19.7 12 16.8 Dist. Dist. Dist. Dist. Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-4 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-2 131.2 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 51.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 17 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-5 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-3 129.5 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): 1 inch Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): 4 inch ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, moist, loose, fine grained sand, trace construction debris (i.e.:clay pipe fragments) ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, moist, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceaous Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous, Iron oxide stains, grades to dark brown fine sand in tip Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous, trace iron oxide, trace pinhole pores Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Pale gray, damp, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 20 ft, Brown Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 14 10 12 12 9 25.1 4.4 20 96.9 97.5 98 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-6 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-4 132.0 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 ALLUVIUM (Qal) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, some palm tree roots @ 4 ft, medium dense, some small sand lenses Sand (SP): Pale brown, dry to damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous, no roots present @ 10 ft, damp, medium dense Boring ended at 15 feet. No groundwater encountered. Converted into percolation test well (P-2). 18 12 10 15 9 2.7 7.2 10.9 2.2 99.1 92.3 98.5 93.7 Hydro 200 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-7 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Olive brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Light brown, damp to moist, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, medium dense, fine to coarse grained sand, micaceous, trace amounts of fine gravel @ 10 ft, fine to coarse gravel, thin sandy silt lens @ 15 ft, medium to coarse grained sand, no silt lenses, no gravel @ 20 ft, dense, trace fine to coarse gravel Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, medium stiff, fine grained sand, micaceous. trace iron oxide staining 16 35 11 24 7 16 10.4 2.2 21.8 15.1 2.6 95.9 100.3 96.6 101.7 93.6 Max EI SO4 DS pH Resist Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-8 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-5 134.8 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 30 @ 30 ft, Olive brown, very moist, very stiff Sand (SP): Light brown, moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 31.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 6 15 Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-9 Project: Address: Job Number: Drill Method: Client: Driving Weight: Location: Elevation: Date: Logged By: Depth (feet) Lith- ology Blows Per Foot Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Other Lab Tests Laboratory TestsSamples Material Description E X P L O R A T I O N L O G 1600 W Lincoln Ave, Anaheim, CA 92801 2623.00 7/8/2017 AJAHollow-Stem Auger Development Advisors, LLC B-6 133.1 W a t e r C o r e B u l k 140 lbs / 30 in 5 10 15 20 Asphalt Concrete (AC): Crushed Aggregate Base (CAB): ARTIFICIAL FILL (Af) Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous ALLUVIUM (Qal) Sand (SP): Pale brown, damp, loose, medium to coarse grained sand, thin silty sand lense in tip Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sand (SP): Brown, damp, medium dense, medium to coarse grained sand, micaceous @ 10 ft, same Sand with Silt (SP-SM): Brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous @ 15 ft, Silty Sand (SM): grades to silty sand Silty Sand (SM): Dark brown, damp, loose, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Sandy Silt (ML): Dark brown, moist, very stiff, fine to medium grained sand, micaceous Boring ended at 21.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. Backfilled with cuttings. Patched with cold patch asphalt concrete. 5 6 18 10 14 22 2.7 2 19.2 3.1 97.4 95.1 98.7 95.4 Consol Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc.Plate A-11 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING 6" 3 " 1 . 5 " 3 / 4 " 3 / 8 " 4 1 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 U. S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E S I Z E S 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 Plate No: B-1 Job No: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION GR A V E L S A N D SI L T A N D C L A Y CO A R S E F I N E ME D I U M UN I F I E D S O I L C L A S S I F I C A T I O N CO A R S E FI N E CO B B L E S CL A S S I F I C A T I O N PI LL SY M B O L SA M P L E LO C A T I O N 0.0001 0. 0 0 1 0. 0 1 0. 1 1 10 10 0 GR A I N S I Z E I N M I L L I M E T E R S 1009080706050403020100PERCENT RETAINED 0102030405060708090 10 0 P E R C E N T P A S S I N G ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPENDIX C PERCOLATION TESTING AND ANALYSES Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 25 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 134.8 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal.) 0 10:22 20 7.00 0.00 5 10:27 20 4.00 27.50 10 10:32 20 3.50 55.00 15 10:37 20 3.00 73.75 20 10:42 20 3.00 90.00 25 10:47 20 2.50 105.00 30 10:52 20 2.50 118.75 40 11:02 20 2.00 143.75 50 11:12 20 2.00 166.25 60 11:22 20 2.00 186.25 70 11:32 20 2.00 206.25 90 11:52 20 2.00 246.25 Constant Head Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head 7/18/2017 P-1 Development Services 0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 300.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-1 Client:Job. No.: 2623.00 Date Tested:Test by: MP Location: Top of Casing to Bottom of Well (ft): 15 Elev. of Ground Surface (ft): 132 Diam. of Test Hole (in): 6 Diam. of Casing (in): 2 Ht. to Top of Casing (ft): 0 Water Tempurature (C°): 21 Elapsed Time Depth to H2O Flow Rate Total H2O used (minutes)(ft)(gal./min.) (gal) 0 12:55 13 6.25 0.00 10 13:05 13 6.25 62.50 20 13:15 13 6.25 125.00 30 13:25 13.2 6.25 187.50 40 13:35 13.3 6.25 250.00 50 13:45 13.4 6.25 312.50 60 13:55 13.5 6.25 375.00 70 14:05 13.5 6.25 437.50 80 14:15 13.5 6.25 500.00 90 14:25 13.5 6.25 562.50 Time Field Percolation Testing - Constent Head Development Services 7/18/2017 P-2 Constant Head 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 0 102030405060708090100 Ac c u m u l a t e d Fl o w ‐ Ga l l o n s Time ‐Minutes ALBUS-KEEFE ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-2 J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐1 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 25 feet 20 feet 5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required: 1243.8 Gal. 2 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 4.54E‐03 ft/min. 3.27 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-3 Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Low Water Table High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Depth to Water (h₂): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. Temperature (T): (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: J.N.: 2623 Client: Development Services Well No.: P‐2 Condition 1 Condition 2 Condition 3 Units: 1 15 feet 13.5 feet 1.5 feet 3.0 Inches Minimum Volume Required:81.3 Gal. 6.25 Gal/min. 21 Celsius 0.9647 ft^3/min. Ignore Tᵤ 1 9.48E‐02 ft/min. 68.23 in./hr. ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.Plate C-4 Temperature (T): Depth to Water (h₂): Enter Condition (1, 2 or 3): Ground Surface to Bottom of Well (h₁): Height of Water in the Well (h₁‐h₂=h): Radius of Well (r): Discharge Rate of Water Into Well for Steady‐State Condition (q): The presence or absence of a water table or impervious soil layer within a distance of less than three times that of the water depth in the well (measured from the water surface) will enable the water table to be classified as Condition I, Condition II, Condtion III. Low Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table, or to an impervious soil layer which is considered for test puposes to be equivalent to a water table, is greater than three times the depth of water in the well, classify as Condition I. High Water Table‐When the distance from the water surface in the test well to the ground water table or to an impervious layer is less than three times the depth of water in the well, a high water table condition exists. Use Condition II when the water table or impervious layer is below the well bottom. Use Condition III when the water table or impervious layer is above the well bottom. (Viscosity of Water @ Temp. T) / (Viscosity of water @ 20° C) (V): Unsaturated Distance Between the Water Surface in the Well and the Water table (Tᵤ): Factor of Safety: Coefficient of Permeability @ 20° C (k₂₀): Design k₂₀: High water Table with Water Above the Well Bottom High Water Table & Water Below Bottom of Well Low Water Table INFILTRATION WELL DESIGN Constant Head USBR 7300‐89 Method Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-5 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. STEADY STATE FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 95 feet Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 4 8 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-6 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 15 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 3 . 2 5 h r ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-7 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 45 minutes FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -10 -6 -2 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-8 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 1.5 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 0 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-9 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 2.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Soil No. 3 - Silty Sand & Sand Soil No. 1 - Imperm. Soil No. 2 - Sand -8 -4 -2 ALBUS-KEEFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PLATE C-10 Contours are Pressure Head in Feet. TRANSIENT @ 3.25 hours FLOW ANALYSIS OF 20 ft DEEP, 6 ft DIAMETER DRY WELL Arrows indicate direction of flow and relative magnitude of velocity. Radius (ft) 0 102030405060 El e v a t i o n ( f t ) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 APPENDIX G HYDROMODIFICATION CALCULATIONS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1355 Analysis prepared by: Fuscoe Engineering 16795 Von Karman Suite 100 Irvine CA 92606 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Existing Condition Hydrograph - Entire Site 2-year storm event ============================================================================ *** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 5.28 10.00 32.(AMC II) 0.400 0.801 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 5.28 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.040 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.199 ============================================================================ Problem Descriptions: 1600 West Lincoln Avenue Existing Condition Hydrograph - Entire Site 2-year storm event (calibration coefficient = 0.773) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.77 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 5.28 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.040 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.199 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 9.28 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.58 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.32 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.07 0.0003 0.10 Q . . . . 0.22 0.0016 0.10 Q . . . . 0.38 0.0030 0.11 Q . . . . 0.53 0.0043 0.11 Q . . . . 0.69 0.0057 0.11 Q . . . . 0.84 0.0071 0.11 Q . . . . 1.00 0.0084 0.11 Q . . . . 1.15 0.0098 0.11 Q . . . . 1.31 0.0112 0.11 Q . . . . 1.46 0.0126 0.11 Q . . . . 1.62 0.0141 0.11 Q . . . . 1.77 0.0155 0.11 Q . . . . 1.93 0.0169 0.11 Q . . . . 2.08 0.0184 0.11 Q . . . . 2.23 0.0198 0.11 Q . . . . 2.39 0.0213 0.11 Q . . . . 2.54 0.0228 0.12 Q . . . . 2.70 0.0242 0.12 Q . . . . 2.85 0.0257 0.12 Q . . . . 3.01 0.0272 0.12 Q . . . . 3.16 0.0288 0.12 Q . . . . 3.32 0.0303 0.12 Q . . . . 3.47 0.0318 0.12 Q . . . . 3.63 0.0334 0.12 Q . . . . 3.78 0.0350 0.12 Q . . . . 3.94 0.0365 0.12 Q . . . . 4.09 0.0381 0.13 Q . . . . 4.25 0.0397 0.13 Q . . . . 4.40 0.0413 0.13 Q . . . . 4.55 0.0430 0.13 Q . . . . 4.71 0.0446 0.13 Q . . . . 4.86 0.0463 0.13 Q . . . . 5.02 0.0479 0.13 Q . . . . 5.17 0.0496 0.13 Q . . . . 5.33 0.0513 0.13 Q . . . . 5.48 0.0530 0.13 Q . . . . 5.64 0.0548 0.14 Q . . . . 5.79 0.0565 0.14 Q . . . . 5.95 0.0583 0.14 Q . . . . 6.10 0.0601 0.14 Q . . . . 6.26 0.0619 0.14 Q . . . . 6.41 0.0637 0.14 Q . . . . 6.57 0.0655 0.14 Q . . . . 6.72 0.0674 0.15 Q . . . . 6.87 0.0692 0.15 Q . . . . 7.03 0.0711 0.15 Q . . . . 7.18 0.0731 0.15 Q . . . . 7.34 0.0750 0.15 Q . . . . 7.49 0.0769 0.15 Q . . . . 7.65 0.0789 0.16 Q . . . . 7.80 0.0809 0.16 Q . . . . 7.96 0.0829 0.16 Q . . . . 2 8.11 0.0850 0.16 Q . . . . 8.27 0.0871 0.16 Q . . . . 8.42 0.0892 0.17 Q . . . . 8.58 0.0913 0.17 Q . . . . 8.73 0.0934 0.17 Q . . . . 8.89 0.0956 0.17 Q . . . . 9.04 0.0978 0.17 Q . . . . 9.19 0.1001 0.18 Q . . . . 9.35 0.1023 0.18 Q . . . . 9.50 0.1046 0.18 Q . . . . 9.66 0.1070 0.18 Q . . . . 9.81 0.1093 0.19 Q . . . . 9.97 0.1118 0.19 Q . . . . 10.12 0.1142 0.19 Q . . . . 10.28 0.1167 0.20 Q . . . . 10.43 0.1192 0.20 Q . . . . 10.59 0.1218 0.20 Q . . . . 10.74 0.1244 0.21 Q . . . . 10.90 0.1271 0.21 Q . . . . 11.05 0.1298 0.21 Q . . . . 11.21 0.1326 0.22 Q . . . . 11.36 0.1354 0.22 Q . . . . 11.51 0.1383 0.23 Q . . . . 11.67 0.1412 0.23 Q . . . . 11.82 0.1442 0.24 Q . . . . 11.98 0.1473 0.24 Q . . . . 12.13 0.1507 0.29 .Q . . . . 12.29 0.1545 0.31 .Q . . . . 12.44 0.1585 0.32 .Q . . . . 12.60 0.1626 0.32 .Q . . . . 12.75 0.1668 0.33 .Q . . . . 12.91 0.1711 0.34 .Q . . . . 13.06 0.1755 0.35 .Q . . . . 13.22 0.1800 0.36 .Q . . . . 13.37 0.1847 0.37 .Q . . . . 13.53 0.1895 0.38 .Q . . . . 13.68 0.1945 0.40 .Q . . . . 13.83 0.1996 0.41 .Q . . . . 13.99 0.2050 0.43 .Q . . . . 14.14 0.2106 0.45 .Q . . . . 14.30 0.2165 0.48 .Q . . . . 14.45 0.2228 0.50 .Q . . . . 14.61 0.2294 0.53 . Q . . . . 14.76 0.2363 0.55 . Q . . . . 14.92 0.2437 0.60 . Q . . . . 15.07 0.2516 0.63 . Q . . . . 15.23 0.2603 0.72 . Q . . . . 15.38 0.2699 0.78 . Q . . . . 15.54 0.2800 0.80 . Q . . . . 15.69 0.2911 0.93 . Q . . . . 15.85 0.3061 1.42 . Q . . . . 16.00 0.3280 2.00 . Q . . . . 16.15 0.3812 6.32 . . . Q . . 16.31 0.4287 1.11 . Q . . . . 16.46 0.4408 0.79 . Q . . . . 16.62 0.4501 0.67 . Q . . . . 16.77 0.4581 0.58 . Q . . . . 16.93 0.4651 0.52 . Q . . . . 17.08 0.4714 0.47 .Q . . . . 17.24 0.4770 0.42 .Q . . . . 17.39 0.4822 0.39 .Q . . . . 3 17.55 0.4870 0.36 .Q . . . . 17.70 0.4915 0.34 .Q . . . . 17.86 0.4958 0.33 .Q . . . . 18.01 0.4999 0.31 .Q . . . . 18.17 0.5035 0.25 Q . . . . 18.32 0.5066 0.24 Q . . . . 18.47 0.5095 0.23 Q . . . . 18.63 0.5123 0.22 Q . . . . 18.78 0.5151 0.21 Q . . . . 18.94 0.5177 0.20 Q . . . . 19.09 0.5202 0.19 Q . . . . 19.25 0.5227 0.19 Q . . . . 19.40 0.5250 0.18 Q . . . . 19.56 0.5273 0.18 Q . . . . 19.71 0.5296 0.17 Q . . . . 19.87 0.5318 0.17 Q . . . . 20.02 0.5339 0.16 Q . . . . 20.18 0.5360 0.16 Q . . . . 20.33 0.5380 0.16 Q . . . . 20.49 0.5400 0.15 Q . . . . 20.64 0.5419 0.15 Q . . . . 20.79 0.5438 0.15 Q . . . . 20.95 0.5456 0.14 Q . . . . 21.10 0.5474 0.14 Q . . . . 21.26 0.5492 0.14 Q . . . . 21.41 0.5510 0.14 Q . . . . 21.57 0.5527 0.13 Q . . . . 21.72 0.5544 0.13 Q . . . . 21.88 0.5560 0.13 Q . . . . 22.03 0.5577 0.13 Q . . . . 22.19 0.5593 0.12 Q . . . . 22.34 0.5608 0.12 Q . . . . 22.50 0.5624 0.12 Q . . . . 22.65 0.5639 0.12 Q . . . . 22.81 0.5654 0.12 Q . . . . 22.96 0.5669 0.12 Q . . . . 23.11 0.5684 0.11 Q . . . . 23.27 0.5698 0.11 Q . . . . 23.42 0.5713 0.11 Q . . . . 23.58 0.5727 0.11 Q . . . . 23.73 0.5741 0.11 Q . . . . 23.89 0.5754 0.11 Q . . . . 24.04 0.5768 0.11 Q . . . . 24.20 0.5775 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1447.7 10% 102.1 20% 27.8 30% 18.6 40% 9.3 50% 9.3 60% 9.3 70% 9.3 4 80% 9.3 90% 9.3 5 SC02EX ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2016 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 23.0 Release Date: 07/01/2016 License ID 1355 Analysis prepared by: Fuscoe Engineering 16795 Vona Karman Suite 100 Irvine CA 92606 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * 1600 W. LINCOLN AVENUE (SAGECREST) * * EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP * * 2-YEAR STORM EVENT * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: SC02EX.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 14:40 06/19/2018 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 8.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 11.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< Page 1 SC02EX >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 132.80 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 8.086 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.718 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.82 0.40 0.100 17 8.09 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.24 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.82 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.24 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 11.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 132.80 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 132.50 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 75.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = 0.0040 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 10.00 "Z" FACTOR = 50.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = 0.016 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 3.00 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.588 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL A 0.60 0.40 0.100 17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 1.66 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.05 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.10 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.19 Tc(MIN.) = 9.28 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.60 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.84 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.42 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.98 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.11 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.14 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 12.00 = 405.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 12.00 TO NODE 12.00 IS CODE = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ Page 2 SC02EX **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 13.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 132.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 7.917 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.739 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 1.67 0.40 0.100 17 7.92 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 2.55 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.67 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.55 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 13.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 51 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE TRAPEZOIDAL CHANNEL FLOW<<<<< >>>>>TRAVELTIME THRU SUBAREA (EXISTING ELEMENT)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 132.50 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 131.30 CHANNEL LENGTH THRU SUBAREA(FEET) = 355.00 CHANNEL SLOPE = 0.0034 CHANNEL BASE(FEET) = 10.00 "Z" FACTOR = 50.000 MANNING'S FACTOR = 0.013 MAXIMUM DEPTH(FEET) = 3.00 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.367 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN COMMERCIAL A 1.56 0.40 0.100 17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 TRAVEL TIME COMPUTED USING ESTIMATED FLOW(CFS) = 3.49 TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA BASED ON VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.43 AVERAGE FLOW DEPTH(FEET) = 0.14 TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 4.12 Tc(MIN.) = 12.04 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.56 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.86 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.23 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.2 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.86 END OF SUBAREA CHANNEL FLOW HYDRAULICS: DEPTH(FEET) = 0.15 FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 1.47 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 14.00 = 685.00 FEET. Page 3 SC02EX **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 14.00 TO NODE 14.00 IS CODE = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 16.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.30 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 133.60 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 8.869 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.629 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 0.63 0.40 0.100 17 8.87 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.90 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.63 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.90 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.00 TO NODE 16.00 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.90 8.87 1.629 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 0.6 15.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 15.00 TO NODE 16.00 = 330.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.98 9.28 1.588 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 1.4 10.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 16.00 = 405.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.84 8.87 1.629 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 2.0 15.00 2 2.86 9.28 1.588 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 2.1 10.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 Page 4 SC02EX COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.86 Tc(MIN.) = 9.277 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 16.00 = 405.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 16.10 TO NODE 16.10 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.84 8.87 1.629 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 2.0 15.00 2 2.86 9.28 1.588 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 2.1 10.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 16.10 = 405.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.86 12.04 1.367 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 3.2 10.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 16.10 = 685.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 6.25 8.87 1.629 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 4.4 15.00 2 6.32 9.28 1.588 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 4.5 10.00 3 6.31 12.04 1.367 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 5.3 10.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.32 Tc(MIN.) = 9.277 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.54 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.10 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 10.00 TO NODE 16.10 = 685.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 TC(MIN.) = 9.28 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.54 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.04 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.100 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 6.32 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 6.25 8.87 1.629 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 4.4 15.00 2 6.32 9.28 1.588 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 4.5 10.00 Page 5 SC02EX 3 6.31 12.04 1.367 0.40( 0.04) 0.10 5.3 10.00 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 6 134 13 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 134 13 4 13 4 1 3 4 13 4 13 4 1 3 6 1 3 6 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 13 2 130 130 13 0 1 3 2 132 1 3 2 13 2 1 3 2 1 3 4 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1470, Los Angeles, California 90017 tel 213.988.8802 fax 213.988.8803 www.fuscoe.com GNIREENEIGN LEGEND NTS ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS ============================================================================ (C) Copyright 1989-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1355 Analysis prepared by: Fuscoe Engineering 16795 Von Karman Suite 100 Irvine CA 92606 **************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Problem Descriptions: 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Proposed Condition Hydrograph - Entire Site 2-year storm event ============================================================================ *** NON-HOMOGENEOUS WATERSHED AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE (Fm) AND LOW LOSS FRACTION ESTIMATIONS FOR AMC I: TOTAL 24-HOUR DURATION RAINFALL DEPTH = 2.05 (inches) SOIL-COVER AREA PERCENT OF SCS CURVE LOSS RATE TYPE (Acres) PERVIOUS AREA NUMBER Fp(in./hr.) YIELD 1 4.15 20.00 32.(AMC II) 0.400 0.712 2 1.13 10.00 32.(AMC II) 0.400 0.801 TOTAL AREA (Acres) = 5.28 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOSS RATE, Fm (in./hr.) = 0.071 _ AREA-AVERAGED LOW LOSS FRACTION, Y = 0.269 ============================================================================ Problem Descriptions: 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Proposed Condition Hydrograph - Entire Site 2-year storm event (calibration coefficient = 0.82) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- RATIONAL METHOD CALIBRATION COEFFICIENT = 0.82 TOTAL CATCHMENT AREA(ACRES) = 5.28 SOIL-LOSS RATE, Fm,(INCH/HR) = 0.071 LOW LOSS FRACTION = 0.269 TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 10.81 SMALL AREA PEAK Q COMPUTED USING PEAK FLOW RATE FORMULA ORANGE COUNTY "VALLEY" RAINFALL VALUES ARE USED RETURN FREQUENCY(YEARS) = 2 5-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.19 30-MINUTE POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.40 1-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.53 3-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 0.89 6-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 1.22 24-HOUR POINT RAINFALL VALUE(INCHES) = 2.05 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL CATCHMENT RUNOFF VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.56 TOTAL CATCHMENT SOIL-LOSS VOLUME(ACRE-FEET) = 0.34 **************************************************************************** TIME VOLUME Q 0. 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (HOURS) (AF) (CFS) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.15 0.0008 0.10 Q . . . . 0.33 0.0023 0.10 Q . . . . 0.51 0.0038 0.10 Q . . . . 0.69 0.0053 0.10 Q . . . . 0.87 0.0069 0.10 Q . . . . 1.05 0.0084 0.11 Q . . . . 1.23 0.0100 0.11 Q . . . . 1.41 0.0116 0.11 Q . . . . 1.59 0.0132 0.11 Q . . . . 1.77 0.0148 0.11 Q . . . . 1.95 0.0164 0.11 Q . . . . 2.13 0.0180 0.11 Q . . . . 2.31 0.0197 0.11 Q . . . . 2.49 0.0213 0.11 Q . . . . 2.67 0.0230 0.11 Q . . . . 2.85 0.0247 0.11 Q . . . . 3.03 0.0264 0.11 Q . . . . 3.21 0.0281 0.12 Q . . . . 3.39 0.0298 0.12 Q . . . . 3.57 0.0316 0.12 Q . . . . 3.75 0.0333 0.12 Q . . . . 3.93 0.0351 0.12 Q . . . . 4.11 0.0369 0.12 Q . . . . 4.29 0.0387 0.12 Q . . . . 4.47 0.0405 0.12 Q . . . . 4.65 0.0424 0.12 Q . . . . 4.83 0.0442 0.13 Q . . . . 5.01 0.0461 0.13 Q . . . . 5.19 0.0480 0.13 Q . . . . 5.37 0.0499 0.13 Q . . . . 5.55 0.0519 0.13 Q . . . . 5.73 0.0538 0.13 Q . . . . 5.91 0.0558 0.13 Q . . . . 6.09 0.0578 0.14 Q . . . . 6.27 0.0598 0.14 Q . . . . 6.45 0.0619 0.14 Q . . . . 6.63 0.0640 0.14 Q . . . . 6.81 0.0661 0.14 Q . . . . 6.99 0.0682 0.14 Q . . . . 7.17 0.0703 0.15 Q . . . . 7.35 0.0725 0.15 Q . . . . 7.53 0.0747 0.15 Q . . . . 7.71 0.0769 0.15 Q . . . . 7.89 0.0792 0.15 Q . . . . 8.07 0.0815 0.15 Q . . . . 8.25 0.0838 0.16 Q . . . . 8.43 0.0862 0.16 Q . . . . 8.61 0.0886 0.16 Q . . . . 8.79 0.0910 0.16 Q . . . . 8.97 0.0935 0.17 Q . . . . 9.15 0.0960 0.17 Q . . . . 2 9.33 0.0985 0.17 Q . . . . 9.51 0.1011 0.18 Q . . . . 9.69 0.1038 0.18 Q . . . . 9.87 0.1065 0.18 Q . . . . 10.05 0.1092 0.19 Q . . . . 10.23 0.1120 0.19 Q . . . . 10.41 0.1148 0.19 Q . . . . 10.60 0.1177 0.20 Q . . . . 10.78 0.1207 0.20 Q . . . . 10.96 0.1237 0.20 Q . . . . 11.14 0.1267 0.21 Q . . . . 11.32 0.1299 0.21 Q . . . . 11.50 0.1331 0.22 Q . . . . 11.68 0.1364 0.22 Q . . . . 11.86 0.1398 0.23 Q . . . . 12.04 0.1433 0.24 Q . . . . 12.22 0.1473 0.30 .Q . . . . 12.40 0.1517 0.30 .Q . . . . 12.58 0.1563 0.31 .Q . . . . 12.76 0.1610 0.32 .Q . . . . 12.94 0.1658 0.33 .Q . . . . 13.12 0.1708 0.34 .Q . . . . 13.30 0.1760 0.35 .Q . . . . 13.48 0.1813 0.36 .Q . . . . 13.66 0.1869 0.38 .Q . . . . 13.84 0.1926 0.39 .Q . . . . 14.02 0.1986 0.42 .Q . . . . 14.20 0.2050 0.44 .Q . . . . 14.38 0.2118 0.48 .Q . . . . 14.56 0.2191 0.50 .Q . . . . 14.74 0.2268 0.54 . Q . . . . 14.92 0.2350 0.57 . Q . . . . 15.10 0.2439 0.63 . Q . . . . 15.28 0.2536 0.68 . Q . . . . 15.46 0.2641 0.74 . Q . . . . 15.64 0.2754 0.77 . Q . . . . 15.82 0.2902 1.22 . Q . . . . 16.00 0.3127 1.79 . Q . . . . 16.18 0.3706 5.98 . . . Q . . 16.36 0.4220 0.92 . Q . . . . 16.54 0.4342 0.73 . Q . . . . 16.72 0.4441 0.60 . Q . . . . 16.90 0.4524 0.52 . Q . . . . 17.08 0.4597 0.46 .Q . . . . 17.26 0.4661 0.40 .Q . . . . 17.44 0.4719 0.37 .Q . . . . 17.62 0.4772 0.35 .Q . . . . 17.80 0.4822 0.33 .Q . . . . 17.98 0.4869 0.31 .Q . . . . 18.16 0.4911 0.26 .Q . . . . 18.34 0.4947 0.23 Q . . . . 18.52 0.4980 0.22 Q . . . . 18.70 0.5011 0.21 Q . . . . 18.88 0.5042 0.20 Q . . . . 19.06 0.5071 0.19 Q . . . . 19.24 0.5098 0.18 Q . . . . 19.42 0.5125 0.18 Q . . . . 19.60 0.5151 0.17 Q . . . . 19.78 0.5176 0.17 Q . . . . 19.96 0.5201 0.16 Q . . . . 20.14 0.5224 0.16 Q . . . . 3 20.32 0.5247 0.15 Q . . . . 20.50 0.5269 0.15 Q . . . . 20.68 0.5291 0.14 Q . . . . 20.86 0.5312 0.14 Q . . . . 21.04 0.5333 0.14 Q . . . . 21.22 0.5353 0.13 Q . . . . 21.41 0.5373 0.13 Q . . . . 21.59 0.5393 0.13 Q . . . . 21.77 0.5412 0.13 Q . . . . 21.95 0.5430 0.12 Q . . . . 22.13 0.5449 0.12 Q . . . . 22.31 0.5466 0.12 Q . . . . 22.49 0.5484 0.12 Q . . . . 22.67 0.5501 0.12 Q . . . . 22.85 0.5518 0.11 Q . . . . 23.03 0.5535 0.11 Q . . . . 23.21 0.5552 0.11 Q . . . . 23.39 0.5568 0.11 Q . . . . 23.57 0.5584 0.11 Q . . . . 23.75 0.5599 0.10 Q . . . . 23.93 0.5615 0.10 Q . . . . 24.11 0.5630 0.10 Q . . . . 24.29 0.5638 0.00 Q . . . . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TIME DURATION(minutes) OF PERCENTILES OF ESTIMATED PEAK FLOW RATE: (Note: 100% of Peak Flow Rate estimate assumed to have an instantaneous time duration) Percentile of Estimated Duration Peak Flow Rate (minutes) ======================= ========= 0% 1448.5 10% 97.3 20% 32.4 30% 10.8 40% 10.8 50% 10.8 60% 10.8 70% 10.8 80% 10.8 90% 10.8 4 LINPR2.RES ____________________________________________________________________________ **************************************************************************** RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY COMPUTER PROGRAM PACKAGE (Reference: 1986 ORANGE COUNTY HYDROLOGY CRITERION) (c) Copyright 1983-2014 Advanced Engineering Software (aes) Ver. 21.0 Release Date: 06/01/2014 License ID 1355 Analysis prepared by: Fuscoe Engineering 16795 Von Karman Suite 100 Irvine CA 92606 ************************** DESCRIPTION OF STUDY ************************** * 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue * * Proposed Condition Hydrology * * 2-year storm event * ************************************************************************** FILE NAME: LINPR2.DAT TIME/DATE OF STUDY: 14:34 07/06/2018 ============================================================================ USER SPECIFIED HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC MODEL INFORMATION: ============================================================================ --*TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION MODEL*-- USER SPECIFIED STORM EVENT(YEAR) = 2.00 SPECIFIED MINIMUM PIPE SIZE(INCH) = 6.00 SPECIFIED PERCENT OF GRADIENTS(DECIMAL) TO USE FOR FRICTION SLOPE = 0.90 *DATA BANK RAINFALL USED* *ANTECEDENT MOISTURE CONDITION (AMC) I ASSUMED FOR RATIONAL METHOD* *USER-DEFINED STREET-SECTIONS FOR COUPLED PIPEFLOW AND STREETFLOW MODEL* HALF- CROWN TO STREET-CROSSFALL: CURB GUTTER-GEOMETRIES: MANNING WIDTH CROSSFALL IN- / OUT-/PARK- HEIGHT WIDTH LIP HIKE FACTOR NO. (FT) (FT) SIDE / SIDE/ WAY (FT) (FT) (FT) (FT) (n) === ===== ========= ================= ====== ===== ====== ===== ======= 1 30.0 20.0 0.018/0.018/0.020 0.67 2.00 0.0312 0.167 0.0150 GLOBAL STREET FLOW-DEPTH CONSTRAINTS: 1. Relative Flow-Depth = 0.00 FEET as (Maximum Allowable Street Flow Depth) - (Top-of-Curb) 2. (Depth)*(Velocity) Constraint = 6.0 (FT*FT/S) *SIZE PIPE WITH A FLOW CAPACITY GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO THE UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY PIPE.* *USER-SPECIFIED MINIMUM TOPOGRAPHIC SLOPE ADJUSTMENT NOT SELECTED **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 21.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 133.50 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 9.692 Page 1 LINPR2.RES * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.548 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.51 0.40 0.200 17 9.69 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.67 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.51 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.67 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 21.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 131.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 129.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 221.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 9.0 INCH PIPE IS 4.2 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.29 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 9.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 0.67 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.12 Tc(MIN.) = 10.81 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 22.00 = 551.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 10.81 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.454 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN APARTMENTS A 0.91 0.40 0.200 17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.91 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.13 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 1.42 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.4 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.76 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 22.00 TO NODE 22.00 IS CODE = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 1 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 24.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 136.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 135.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 Page 2 LINPR2.RES SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 9.862 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.533 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) COMMERCIAL A 1.13 0.40 0.100 17 9.86 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.100 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.52 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 1.13 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.52 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 24.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 132.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 129.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 616.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 12.0 INCH PIPE IS 7.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 3.19 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 12.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 1.52 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 3.22 Tc(MIN.) = 13.08 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 25.00 = 946.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 24.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 13.08 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.304 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN APARTMENTS A 1.20 0.40 0.200 17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 1.20 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 1.32 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.33 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.06 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.3 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.61 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 1 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 13.08 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.30 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.06 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.15 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.33 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 2.33 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 2.61 Page 3 LINPR2.RES **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 27.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 134.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 10.511 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.478 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.54 0.40 0.200 17 10.51 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.68 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.54 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.68 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 27.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 31 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>COMPUTE PIPE-FLOW TRAVEL TIME THRU SUBAREA<<<<< >>>>>USING COMPUTER-ESTIMATED PIPESIZE (NON-PRESSURE FLOW)<<<<< ============================================================================ ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 130.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 129.00 FLOW LENGTH(FEET) = 192.00 MANNING'S N = 0.013 DEPTH OF FLOW IN 9.0 INCH PIPE IS 5.0 INCHES PIPE-FLOW VELOCITY(FEET/SEC.) = 2.67 ESTIMATED PIPE DIAMETER(INCH) = 9.00 NUMBER OF PIPES = 1 PIPE-FLOW(CFS) = 0.68 PIPE TRAVEL TIME(MIN.) = 1.20 Tc(MIN.) = 11.71 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 26.00 TO NODE 25.00 = 522.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 27.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 81 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>ADDITION OF SUBAREA TO MAINLINE PEAK FLOW<<<<< ============================================================================ MAINLINE Tc(MIN.) = 11.71 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.389 SUBAREA LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN APARTMENTS A 0.36 0.40 0.200 17 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 SUBAREA AREA(ACRES) = 0.36 SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.42 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 0.90 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.9 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 1.06 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>DESIGNATE INDEPENDENT STREAM FOR CONFLUENCE<<<<< Page 4 LINPR2.RES >>>>>AND COMPUTE VARIOUS CONFLUENCED STREAM VALUES<<<<< ============================================================================ TOTAL NUMBER OF STREAMS = 2 CONFLUENCE VALUES USED FOR INDEPENDENT STREAM 2 ARE: TIME OF CONCENTRATION(MIN.) = 11.71 RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.39 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 EFFECTIVE STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.90 TOTAL STREAM AREA(ACRES) = 0.90 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) AT CONFLUENCE = 1.06 ** CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.61 13.08 1.304 0.40( 0.06) 0.15 2.3 23.00 2 1.06 11.71 1.389 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.9 26.00 RAINFALL INTENSITY AND TIME OF CONCENTRATION RATIO CONFLUENCE FORMULA USED FOR 2 STREAMS. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.55 11.71 1.389 0.40( 0.07) 0.17 3.0 26.00 2 3.60 13.08 1.304 0.40( 0.07) 0.17 3.2 23.00 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 3.60 Tc(MIN.) = 13.08 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 3.23 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.17 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 3.2 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 25.00 = 946.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 25.00 TO NODE 25.00 IS CODE = 10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>MAIN-STREAM MEMORY COPIED ONTO MEMORY BANK # 2 <<<<< ============================================================================ **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 29.00 IS CODE = 21 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>RATIONAL METHOD INITIAL SUBAREA ANALYSIS<<<<< >>USE TIME-OF-CONCENTRATION NOMOGRAPH FOR INITIAL SUBAREA<< ============================================================================ INITIAL SUBAREA FLOW-LENGTH(FEET) = 330.00 ELEVATION DATA: UPSTREAM(FEET) = 135.00 DOWNSTREAM(FEET) = 134.00 Tc = K*[(LENGTH** 3.00)/(ELEVATION CHANGE)]**0.20 SUBAREA ANALYSIS USED MINIMUM Tc(MIN.) = 10.511 * 2 YEAR RAINFALL INTENSITY(INCH/HR) = 1.478 SUBAREA Tc AND LOSS RATE DATA(AMC I ): DEVELOPMENT TYPE/ SCS SOIL AREA Fp Ap SCS Tc LAND USE GROUP (ACRES) (INCH/HR) (DECIMAL) CN (MIN.) APARTMENTS A 0.63 0.40 0.200 17 10.51 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS LOSS RATE, Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 SUBAREA AVERAGE PERVIOUS AREA FRACTION, Ap = 0.200 Page 5 LINPR2.RES SUBAREA RUNOFF(CFS) = 0.79 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 0.63 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 0.79 **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 0.00 TO NODE 0.00 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 1 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 0.79 10.51 1.478 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 0.6 28.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 28.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 330.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 1 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 1.76 10.81 1.454 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 1.4 20.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 551.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.53 10.51 1.478 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 2.0 28.00 2 2.54 10.81 1.454 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 2.1 20.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 2.54 Tc(MIN.) = 10.810 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 2.05 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.08 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.20 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 2.1 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 551.00 FEET. **************************************************************************** FLOW PROCESS FROM NODE 0.00 TO NODE 0.00 IS CODE = 11 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>CONFLUENCE MEMORY BANK # 2 WITH THE MAIN-STREAM MEMORY<<<<< ============================================================================ ** MAIN STREAM CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 2.53 10.51 1.478 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 2.0 28.00 2 2.54 10.81 1.454 0.40( 0.08) 0.20 2.1 20.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 20.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 551.00 FEET. ** MEMORY BANK # 2 CONFLUENCE DATA ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 3.55 11.71 1.389 0.40( 0.07) 0.17 3.0 26.00 2 3.60 13.08 1.304 0.40( 0.07) 0.17 3.2 23.00 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 946.00 FEET. ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 5.93 10.51 1.478 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 4.7 28.00 Page 6 LINPR2.RES 2 5.98 10.81 1.454 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 4.8 20.00 3 5.97 11.71 1.389 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 5.0 26.00 4 5.85 13.08 1.304 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 5.3 23.00 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 COMPUTED CONFLUENCE ESTIMATES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.98 Tc(MIN.) = 10.810 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.81 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR) = 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.18 TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 LONGEST FLOWPATH FROM NODE 23.00 TO NODE 0.00 = 946.00 FEET. ============================================================================ END OF STUDY SUMMARY: TOTAL AREA(ACRES) = 5.3 TC(MIN.) = 10.81 EFFECTIVE AREA(ACRES) = 4.81 AREA-AVERAGED Fm(INCH/HR)= 0.07 AREA-AVERAGED Fp(INCH/HR) = 0.40 AREA-AVERAGED Ap = 0.181 PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) = 5.98 ** PEAK FLOW RATE TABLE ** STREAM Q Tc Intensity Fp(Fm) Ap Ae HEADWATER NUMBER (CFS) (MIN.) (INCH/HR) (INCH/HR) (ACRES) NODE 1 5.93 10.51 1.478 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 4.7 28.00 2 5.98 10.81 1.454 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 4.8 20.00 3 5.97 11.71 1.389 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 5.0 26.00 4 5.85 13.08 1.304 0.40( 0.07) 0.18 5.3 23.00 ============================================================================ ============================================================================ END OF RATIONAL METHOD ANALYSIS Page 7 1 3 4 13 4 13 4 1 3 6 1 3 6 134 134 134 134 134 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 13 2 130 130 13 0 1 3 2 13 2 1 3 2 600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1470, Los Angeles, California 90017 tel 213.988.8802 fax 213.988.8803 www.fuscoe.com GNIREENEIGN LEGEND NTS 1600 W. Lincoln Avenue Project Appendix I Preliminary Hydrology Report, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., July 2019 PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT 1600 West Lincoln Avenue City of Anaheim, CA 92801 Prepared For: Development Advisors, LLC 2400 E. Katella Avenue, Ste. 800 Anaheim, CA 92806 Prepared By: Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 600 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1470 Los Angeles, California 90017 213.988.8802 www.fuscoe.com Project Manager: Brittany Knott, PE C-76502 1st Submittal: July 2018 2nd Submittal: July 2019 Job Number: 1267-002-01 PR E L I M I N A R Y H Y D R O L O G Y R E P O R T 16 0 0 W e s t L i n c o l n A v e n u e A n a h e i m , C A J u l y 2 0 1 9 PR E L I M I N A R Y H Y D R O L O G Y R E P O R T 16 0 0 W e s t L i n c o l n A v e n u e A n a h e i m , C A J u l y 2 0 1 9 PR E L I M I N A R Y H Y D R O L O G Y R E P O R T 16 0 0 W e s t L i n c o l n A v e n u e A n a h e i m , C A J u l y 2 0 1 9 1267.002.01 1267.002.01 1267.002.01 PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue City of Anaheim, CA PREPARED BY: Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1470 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 988-8802 Project Number: 1267-002-01 1600 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE Anaheim, CA Supervising Engineer: Brittany Knott, P.E. Date Prepared: July 2019 PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue City of Anaheim, CA Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Geographic Setting ...........................................................................................3 1.2 Project Description ............................................................................................4 1.3 Purpose of This Report .......................................................................................4 1.4 References .......................................................................................................4 2.0 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC & HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS 5 2.1 Existing Topography ..........................................................................................5 2.2 Existing Drainage and Soil Type ..........................................................................5 3.0 PROPOSED ON-SITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES 6 4.0 HYDROLOGY STUDY 7 4.1 Storm Frequency ...............................................................................................7 4.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................7 4.3 Master Plan of Drainage ....................................................................................7 5.0 SECONDARY OVERFLOW 8 5.1 Criteria ............................................................................................................8 5.2 Ponding Exhibit .................................................................................................8 6.0 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 9 7.0 APPENDICES 10 Appendix 1 Site Plan Appendix 2 FEMA Map Appendix 3 Soils Information Appendix 4 Existing Condition Hydrology Calculations Appendix 5 Proposed Condition Hydrology Calculations Appendix 6 Existing & Proposed Condition Hydrology Maps Appendix 7 Master Plan of Drainage Excerpts PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 3 City of Anaheim, CA 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 GEOGRAPHIC SETTING The project site, known as “1600 West Lincoln Avenue”, encompasses approximately 5.3 acres, and is located in the City of Anaheim at the southwest corner of W. Lincoln Avenue and S. Loara Street. The property is bounded on the north by W. Lincoln Avenue, on the east by S. Loara Street, on the west by commercial auto and residential development, and on the south by Loara Elementary School and industrial office. Interstate-5 (I-5) Freeway is to the north of the site, Euclid Street is to the west, and W. Broadway is located to the south. The easterly end of the W. Pampas Lane cul-de-sac is at the southwest corner of the site. The site is presently occupied by an active auto dealership. A Vicinity Map is included as Figure 1, below. Figure 1 – Vicinity Map PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 4 City of Anaheim, CA 1.2 Project Description The proposed construction consists of redevelopment of the existing dealership into a mixed-use 4-story Type V-A residential building, along with 10,500 square feet of retail, surrounding a 6-level Type I-A parking structure. A total of 315 residential units are proposed. Driveways will provide access to the property from W. Lincoln Avenue and S. Loara Street. A Site Map of the proposed development has been prepared by Architects Orange, is included in Appendix 1 of this report. 1.3 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT The purpose of this report is to accomplish the following objectives: • To determine pre-development and post-developed storm water discharges generated within the project area for determination of design feasibility, detention requirements, constructability and impact on existing facilities. • To establish that there are no significant impacts to the surrounding facilities and properties because of this proposed development. • To determine site detention requirements, if any, for the project. 1.4 REFERENCES • AES Computer Software • Orange County Hydrology Manual, 1986 • Web Soil Survey (prepared by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Custom Soil Resource) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • Infiltration Study prepared by Albus-Keefe & Associates, Inc. (May 8, 2018) • City of Anaheim Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area (September 2010) PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 5 City of Anaheim, CA 2.0 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC & HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS 2.1 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY The project site is relatively flat, with grades ranging from 0.5% to 1%. The site drains in three directions, and the stormwater discharges from the property at the following three locations: • Approximately 25% of site (1.42 acres; Q10=3.7 cfs) discharges to W. Lincoln Avenue, as sheet-flow; • Approximately 12% of the site (0.63 acre; Q10=1.6 cfs) discharges to S. Loara Street, as sheet-flow; • Approximately 63% of the site (3.23 acres; Q10=7.3 cfs) discharges to the end of the W. Pampas Lane cul-de-sac, through a parkway culvert. 2.2 EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SOIL TYPE The site is within Zone X (shaded), as shown on Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Number 06059C0129J (dated December 3, 2009), which depicts areas within the 0.2-percent chance (500-year) flood hazard. A CLOMR/LOMR will not be required. A copy of the site-specific FEMA Map is included as Appendix 2. The entire site is within hydrologic soil group “B”. A copy of the Orange County Hydrologic Soil Type Map showing project site is included in this report as Appendix 3. Based on our review, there are no underground drainage facilities within the site. The drainage leaving the site is conveyed southerly and westerly within the adjacent roadways to downstream storm drain infrastructure. In addition, there are no public storm drain facilities in the vicinity of the project site. The nearest catch basin in Lincoln Avenue (length = 7 feet) is 700 feet westerly, before Euclid Street. The nearest catch basin in Loara Street (length = 21 feet) is 600 feet southerly, before Broadway. There is no catch basin in Pampas Lane; there is an existing parkway culvert at the easterly end of the cul de sac, which accepts a portion of the drainage from the project site. The drainage is conveyed westerly in Pampas Lane, and then turns southerly in Euclid, where it continues toward Broadway where is intercepted by a catch basin (length = 21 feet) before Broadway. The site is currently 95% impervious. The proposed development will result in a site that is 85% impervious. PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT July 2019 1600 West Lincoln Avenue 6 City of Anaheim, CA 3.0 PROPOSED ON-SITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES The developed project will be designed to mimic the drainage patterns of the existing conditions. There will be three discharge locations as follows: • Approximately 25% of site (1.42 acres; Q10=3.4 cfs) discharges to W. Lincoln Avenue, as sheet-flow; • Approximately 12% of the site (0.63 acre; Q10=1.5 cfs) discharges to S. Loara Street, as sheet-flow; • Approximately 63% of the site (3.23 acres; Q10=6.8 cfs) discharges to the end of the W. Pampas Lane cul-de-sac, through a parkway culvert. Onsite drainage will be collected and conveyed to proposed drywells for water quality purposes using a low-flow subdrain system. Preliminary analyses show that the proposed condition discharge rates (Q’s) to the three discharge locations will be less than those of the existing condition for the 2-, 10-, 25-, and 100-year storm events. Drywells are anticipated to be utilized for water quality treatment, and would be installed at each of the three discharge locations. Additional percolation testing will be required at each of the proposed locations.