Resolution-PC 2022-062
- 1 - PC2022-062
RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-062
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2020-
00002 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND SRB
MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
(DEV2020-00127A)
(2000 EAST GENE AUTRY WAY)
WHEREAS, Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section
65864) of the Government Code of the State of California (herein referred to as the “Statute”)
authorizes a city to enter into a contract which is called a development agreement in order to
establish with certainty what regulations will govern the construction of a development; and
WHEREAS, on November 23, 1982, the City, as a charter City, enacted Ordinance No.
4377 on November 23, 1982, which makes City of Anaheim (the “City”) subject to the
Development Agreement Statute (the “Enabling Ordinance”), and adopted Resolution No. 82R-
565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which establishes procedures and requirements for the
consideration of development agreements; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement entered into by the City
and SRB Management Company, LLC (the “Developer”) and dated December 20, 2019, as
amended by that certain Letter Agreement dated May 12, 2020 and by that certain First
Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement considered by City Council concurrently herewith
(as amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), the Developer will purchase from the City the
approximately 152 acres of land located at 2000 East Gene Autry Way and 2200 East Katella
Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on
the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property");
and
WHEREAS, the Property is located within the Platinum Triangle area, and is currently
improved with an approximately 45,500 seat stadium known as “Angel Stadium of Anaheim”
(“Angel Stadium”), an approximately 1,700 person capacity performance venue known as “City
National Grove of Anaheim” (the “Grove”), and associated surface parking lots; and
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the
confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City,
generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57
Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit.
The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National
Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), and
surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks,
distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and
- 2 - PC2022-062
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council has approved several actions relating to the area
encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on July 9, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR) No. 320 (State Clearinghouse No. 95041029) and adopted Area Development Plan No.
120 for the portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development.
Area Development Plan No. 120 permitted up to 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums,
750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a
150,000 square foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-
site parking spaces. The Grove, the renovated Angel Stadium, and the Stadium Gateway Office
Building were developed/renovated under this plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan (MLUP). The boundaries for the Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP were
generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that this MLUP included
15 acres adjacent to I-5 that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of
the approval process for the Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP, the City Council also certified FEIR
No. 321 (State Clearinghouse No. 9611041) and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106. Development within the Anaheim Stadium Area was implemented through the Sports
Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone, which permitted existing uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased
land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of
491,303 square feet of industrial space and an increase of 1,871,285 square feet of new office
space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects
that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate
Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle
from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-
High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing
uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update
also established the overall maximum development intensity for the Platinum Triangle to be up to
9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial
uses, industrial development at a maximum floor-area ratio (“FAR”) of 0.50, and institutional
development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seating allocated to the
existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan
No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use land use designation. Final
Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (“FEIR No. 330,” State Clearinghouse No. 2003041105),
which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed
the above development intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring
programs, including an Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 for the
Platinum Triangle; and
- 3 - PC2022-062
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004, in order to provide the implementation tools necessary
to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the Anaheim
Stadium Area MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the “PTMLUP”),
replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone (the “PTMU
Overlay Zone”), approved the form of the Standardized Platinum Triangle Development
Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under these updated zoning
regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions are
required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council adopted and certified the Final
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 (“FSEIR No. 332,” State Clearinghouse No.
2004121045), including an Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to
provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and associated actions, which used the certified
FEIR No. 321 and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. The land use actions associated with
FSEIR No. 332 collectively increased the allowable development intensity within the Platinum
Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet
of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two
addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity
by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of
commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the
allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable
development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550
square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General
Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development
Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities
within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial
uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the
"Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of
Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of a series of
actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, following the approval of FSEIR No. 334, a lawsuit was filed by the Citizens
for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development and the Orange County Communities
Organized for Responsible Development challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City
Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project FSEIR No.
334 and various related actions and directed staff to prepare a new subsequent Environmental
Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
- 4 - PC2022-062
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan, the PTMLUP and
the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522
square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of
institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City
Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project,
including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to
herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved eight addenda to address modifications to the
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. In addition to the eight addenda that the Anaheim
City Council has approved, two additional addenda are currently under preparation; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 2012 (“Addendum No. 1”)
was adopted by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/Interstate 5 Undercrossing
Improvement Project, which included widening of Katella Avenue at the undercrossing with I-5
between Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue and creating a fourth through lane of traffic in
each direction of travel. Maintain dual left-turn pockets at both intersections; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 2012 (“Addendum No.
2”) was adopted by the City Council in connection with the development of a four-story wrap-
style residential building with 399 dwelling units, a five-story parking structure, and a public park
on a 7.01-acre parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue (“Platinum Gateway
Project”). This project included amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP to increase the
total number of dwelling units to 18,988 dwelling units, reduce the commercial square footage to
4,795,111 square feet, reduce the office square footage to 14,131,103 square feet, and maintain the
same square footage for institutional uses at 1,500,000 square feet; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 (“Addendum No. 4”)
was adopted by the City Council in connection with the development of a five-story wrap - style
residential apartment building with 389 units and a six-story parking structure on a 4.13-acre parcel
commonly known as 1005-1105 East Katella Avenue (“Platinum Vista Project”). This project
included amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP to allow up to 19,027 dwelling units,
reduce the commercial square footage to 4,735,111 square feet, and maintain the same square
footage of office uses and institutional uses at 14,131,103 square feet and 1,500,000 square feet
respectively; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 (“Addendum No.
5”) was adopted by the City Council in connection with the revisions to a master planned mixed-
use project on a 43.1-acre property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit
between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial
uses, two public parks and a network of local streets ("A-Town Project"). This project amended
the PTMU Overlay Zone to modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market
Street, clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union
Street, and expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised
- 5 - PC2022-062
project design for the A-Town Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of
Gene Autry Way; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated June 2016 (“Addendum No. 5”)
was adopted by the City Council in connection with the development of a mixed-use community
with 1,079 residential apartments (including 12 live/work units), 14,600 sf of retail uses, and a
1.11-acre public park on a 17.5-acre property located at the southwest corner of State College
Boulevard and Gene Autry Way (“Jefferson Stadium Park Project”). This project included
amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP to relocate and combine two park sites into one
park site and designate previous park site to a mixed-use designation, reconfigure internal streets,
and to reduce the allowable residential units to 18,909, increase the allowable commercial uses to
4,909,682 square feet, increase the allowable offices uses to 14,340,522 square feet, and maintain
the allowable institutional uses at 1,500,000 square feet; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to FSEIR No. 339, dated September 2016 (“Addendum No.
6”) was adopted by the City Council in connection with the development of a mixed-use project
with 405 dwelling units, 433,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 200-room hotel, and 77,000
square feet of office uses on a 14.8-acre property located on the northeast corner of Orangewood
Avenue and State College Boulevard (“LT Platinum Center Project”). This project included
amendments to the General Plan and the PTMLUP to revise the district boundaries to change the
LT Platinum Center Project site from the Gateway District to the Stadium District and created
three Sub-Areas for the Stadium District, including placing the Property into Sub-Area A and
changed the allowable development intensity on the Project Site (Sub-Area A) to 5,175 dwelling
units, 3,095,000 square feet commercial development, 2,832,300 square feet office development
and stadiums with up to 119,543 seats. The Addendum also studied the modification of density
provisions in the Platinum Triangle Area, designated for mixed-use land uses, to reduce the
maximum dwelling units to 17,348 units, increase the maximum commercial uses to 4,782,243
square feet, reduce the maximum office space to 9,180,747 square feet, and remove the designation
of a public park from the site. The Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) was updated as a
result of the transfer of land use density and the General Plan Build-out Year traffic volumes were
reanalyzed. The Platinum Triangle Improvement Plan was updated as a result of this analysis; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 to FSEIR No. 339, dated March 2017 (“Addendum No. 7”)
was adopted by the City Council in connection with the widening of Gene Autry Way from four
lanes to six lanes with medians and storm drain and stormwater improvements; widening of the
west side of State College Boulevard between the Gateway Office and Artisan Court to
accommodate a southbound right-turn lane and a third through lane; making improvements to the
east side of the intersection of State College Boulevard at Gene Autry Way, which is the west
entrance to Angel Stadium; and constructing a new intersection on Gene Autry Way at Union
Street to provide access to planned development areas; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 8 to FSEIR No. 339, dated March 2018 (“Addendum No. 8)
was adopted by the City Council in connection with the widening of Orangewood Avenue from
State College Boulevard to Dupont Drive and from Dupont Drive to the Santa Ana River,
respectively, from four lanes to six lanes with the addition of right-turn lanes. The project also
included improvements on State College Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and Artisan
Court; and
- 6 - PC2022-062
WHEREAS, The Zoning Code Section 18.20.200.020 requires that the City and the
property owner to enter into a development agreement for development projects in the Platinum
Triangle; and
WHEREAS, the Purchase Agreement conditions the City’s agreement to sell the Property
and the Developer’s agreement to purchase the Property on, among other things, a Disposition and
Development Agreement (the “DDA”), to develop the Property not to exceed the development
intensities authorized by PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and SEIR No. 339, and to serve as the
Code required development agreement for the development of the Property; and
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2020, the City Council of City of Anaheim (the "City
Council") approved Development Agreement No. 2020-00002 to provide for development of the
project site with a mixed-use community consisting of up to 5,175 residential dwelling units,
1,750,000 square feet of commercial uses (including up to 943 hotel rooms and the City National
Grove), 2,700,000 square feet of office uses, a 7-acre “Community Benefit Park”, private mini
parks, a site for future development of a fire station, the retention and maintenance of the existing
45,500-seat Angel Stadium, with an option to replace the existing stadium with a replacement
stadium of the same, or lesser, size and seating capacity and a Master Site Plan that provided the
framework for future development of the project site as described in that certain Purchase and Sale
Agreement entered into by the City and SRB Management Company, LLC; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition for Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement
No. 2020-00002 to implement the terms of the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment dated April 26,
2022, by and between the City of Anaheim and the People of the State of California for the
development of the Property; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 to Disposition and Development Agreement No. 2020-
00002 is proposed in conjunction with (i) Tentative Tract Map Mo. 19146 to permit the subdivision
and redevelopment of the Angel Stadium of Anaheim property by creating lots for future mixed-
use development areas, the stadium, public park sites, private street system, condominium air space
for individual ownership of residential or commercial units and common ownership of associated
landscape, private recreation, and parking and access drive areas; (ii) Conditional Use Permit No.
2021-06111 to permit the continued operation of the Angel Stadium of Anaheim property,
including events within the stadium and on the property, sale and consumption of alcoholic
beverages, and a coordinated sign program; and (iii) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06116 to
permit the continued operation of the City National Grove of Anaheim, including concerts and
events, sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages, and a coordinated sign program, herein
collectively referred to as the "Proposed Project";
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 7 - PC2022-062
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual,
the City prepared a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (the “SCEA,” State
Clearing House No. 2020079026) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Code Section 21155.2
(b)) based on an Infill Project Checklist (PRC Section 21094.5 and State CEQA Guidelines
Section 15183.3 and Appendices M and N) for the Proposed Project to evaluate the environmental
impacts of the proposed project and determine that an Appendix N Initial Study Checklist in
connection with SEIR No. 339 is the appropriate environmental documentation, and further
determining that the project is in substantial conformance with the project which was previously
analyzed under the SCEA. The document reviews the analysis in prior EIRs certified by the City
for the Platinum Triangle area (“City prior EIRs” as that term is defined in the SCEA and as
described in the Recitals set forth above) and the Southern California Association of Governments’
(“SCAG”) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Program
EIR (“RTP/SCS PEIR”) to determine if the proposed project would result in new project specific
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts identified in the City prior
EIRs and RTP/SCS PEIR, and whether mitigation measures or uniformly applicable development
policies would substantially mitigate these impacts. The SCEA is used to specifically analyze new
project-specific effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts identified in
the City prior EIRs and RTP/SCS PEIR that are not substantially mitigated by uniformly applicable
development policies. The SCEA identifies previously approved mitigation measures that were
required for previous entitlements; and
WHEREAS, the SCEA concluded that the Proposed Project would not result in substantial
revisions requiring recirculation or the need to prepare an environmental impact report; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation
Monitoring Plan was previously approved for the Previous Project (herein referred to as "Updated
and Modified MMP No. 106D"). A complete copy of Updated and Modified MMP No. 106D is
attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the SCEA as the environmental
documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure
Manual for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic
Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on May 9, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear consider the SCEA and to hear and consider
evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation
and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing with respect to Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2020-
00002, does hereby find and determine that proposed Development Agreement Amendment meets
all of the standards and requirements set forth in the Procedures Resolution, which was adopted by
the City Council on November 23, 1982, that is:
- 8 - PC2022-062
1. The Proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan and with the goals, policies,
programs and objectives specified in the General Plan as the Proposed Project is a mixed-use
development with residential, commercial (including hotels), office, and entertainment uses. The
General Plan designates the project site for Mixed-Use Urban Core land uses, which provides for
mix of residential, commercial, services, hotel and professional offices uses in a high-quality
environment. The Proposed Project also supports the following General Plan goals:
o Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to
address the City’s diverse housing needs.
o Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image
and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations.
o Goal 3.2: Maximize development opportunities along transportation routes.
o Goal 5.1: Create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of
Anaheim residents, employees and visitors.
o Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through
strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development.
o Goal 7.1: Address the jobs-housing relationship by developing housing near job
centers and transportation facilities;
2. The Proposed Project is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations
prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the Project is and will be located as a
mixed-use development is a permitted use within the PTMU Overlay Zone;
3. The Proposed Project is compatible with the orderly development of property in the
surrounding area as the proposed project consists of a mixed-use development at a density that is
consistent with the maximum density allowed for the Project Site and is compatible with the
surrounding commercial, light industrial, and residential land uses in the vicinity;
4. The Proposed Project is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens
of the City of Anaheim as it provides for additional public benefits such as a public park and
affordable housing beyond that required by the Zoning Code, requiring labor agreements for
certain types of projects, and, obtaining a commitment that the Angels will remain in the City until
at least 2050;
5. The Project Site is physically suitable for the Proposed Project and density of
development proposed under Amendment No. 1 to Disposition and Development Agreement No.
2020-00002, as the Proposed Project is within the maximum development densities allowed for
the Project Site, as authorized by the PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and City prior EIRs
PTMLUP;
6. The Proposed Project is not likely to cause serious public health problems as all
environmental impact has been analyzed by the SCEA;
- 9 - PC2022-062
7. The Proposed Project constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power
and authority under, is entered into pursuant to, and is in compliance with the City’s charter
powers, the requirements of Section 65867 of California Government Code and the Procedures
Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that
negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it
considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all
evidence presented to it.
NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve
Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2020-00002, contingent upon and subject to
the approval of (1) Tentative Tract Map No. 19146; (2) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06111;
(3) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06116, now pending, are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction,
then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
- 12 - PC2022-062