Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 2022/05/23
City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, May 23 , 2022 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Natalie Meeks • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Dave Vadodaria • Commissioners: Lucille Kring, LuisAndres Perez, Steve White, David Heywood • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Roll Call • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, May 19, 2022, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 05-23-2022 Page 2 of 5 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 05-23-2022 Page 3 of 5 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 1 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00157 Location: 145 South Vista Grande Request: The applicant requests an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to add a new access point on Santa Ana Canyon Road, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2021-177 to subdivide an existing 3.48 acre property into two parcels. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether an Addendum to the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR No. 330) and Housing Opportunity Sites Rezoning Project (SEIR No. 346) is the appropriate environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Request for continuance to the July 18, 2022 meeting. Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E (DEV2020- 00016) Location: 8712-8729 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Request: The applicant proposes to amend an existing Conditional Use Permit to expand a current church operation in a two-phase scope of work. Phase 1: Relocate 3 modular buildings within the upper campus area, demolish one small structure and wings (911 square feet.) at the existing auditorium building, construction of open “mini-plazas”, new trellis structure, pave and restripe remodeled parking lot, new trash enclosure, and add new 105 space “turf” parking lot by filling existing pond (approx. 32,000 square feet). Phase 2: Renovation and 2,793 square feet (net) addition to existing sanctuary/auditorium bldg.; add 4 new modular buildings (+7,020 square feet), construct a new parking lot with landscape pathways, and repaving/restripe existing parking lots. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Ivan Orozco iorozco@anaheim.net 05-23-2022 Page 4 of 5 Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Kindred Church Expansion (Proposed Project) in compliance with Sections 15070 to 15075 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Adjourn to Monday, June 6, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. 05-23-2022 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 5:00 p.m. May 19, 2022 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: _____________________________ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 8:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 8:00 de la mañana un día hábil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 23, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00157 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2021-177 LOCATION: This property is generally located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road approximately 150 feet west of Avenida Margarita (145 South Vista Grande). PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: The owner and applicant is Harry Sidhu, and the agents are Laurel Reimer and David Blumenthal of Sagecrest Planning and Environmental. REQUEST: The applicant requests an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to add a new access point on Santa Ana Canyon Road, and approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2021-177 to subdivide an existing 3.48 acre property into two parcels. BACKGROUND: The applicant submitted a request to continue the public hearing for this item to the Planning Commission meeting of July 18, 2022 (Attachment 1). Staff also received one email in opposition to the project (Attachment 2). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the public hearing for this request to the meeting of July 18, 2022. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP Niki Wetzel, AICP Senior Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachment: 1. Continuance Request 2. Correspondence 1 Nicholas J. Taylor From:David Blumenthal <dblumenthal@sagecrestplanning.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 18, 2022 3:27 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Cc:Amy Vazquez; Ted White Subject:[EXTERNAL] 145 S Vista Grande - Continuance Request Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Nick, The applicant is requesting the City continue the public hearing to July 18, 2022 to provide additional time to examine project details. DAVID BLUMENTHAL, AICP Senior Project Manager (714) 313‐3713 dblumenthal@sagecrestplanning.com www.sagecrestplanning.com 27128 Paseo Espada, Suite 1524, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Attachment 1 1 Nicholas J. Taylor From: Sent:Saturday, May 14, 2022 2:07 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:[EXTERNAL] May 23 Planning Commission Hearing Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Regarding the request for an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to add a new access point on Santa Ana Canyon Road for the project site located at 145 S. Vista Grande, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2021-177: We oppose the requested amendment to the Circulation Element. All tracts, both south and north of Santa Ana Canyon Road in this area have minimal access points to Santa Ana Canyon Road--Royal Oak/Pinney, Avenida Margarita, and Maude Lane. The two parcels, when developed (or if remaining as currently zoned) should access Santa Ana Canyon through existing routes through Quail Ridge Terrace and/or South Vista Grande. Tracts throughout the hill and canyon area of Anaheim are designed with minimal access points, per policies of the Circulation Element. What is different here? The Circulation Element's policies that support safe and efficient movement of people are demonstrated by current tracts. This proposal should not be an exception to policies in place. Mohinder and Sonja Grewal PO Box 17224 Anaheim, CA 92817 Attachment 2 NEW CORRESPONDENCE ITEM NO. 1 Craig Barkhouse May 23, 2022 Dear City of Anaheim Planning Commission, Residents of the Anaperalta Home Owners Association (HOA) have recently been made aware that Mr. Sidhu has proposed to the City of Anaheim a subdivision of current acreage located at 145 S. Vista Grande, Anaheim, CA 92807 into two parcels of land. His proposal includes installing new sewage/drainage lines, an extension of current utility lines and development of a new ingress/egress point from Santa Ana Canyon to the second parcel of land. We strongly oppose this action as stated below. In 2011, Mr. Sidhu proposed a similar project where he was intending to separate the current acreage and build three different homes on the property. At that time, he was proposing that the access for said properties would have been through the private streets of the Anaperalta HOA, namely Vista Grande. It should be noted that Mr. Sidhu, nor any of his current tenants pay into the Anaperalta HOA dues which go towards maintaining our private streets, sewage lines and entry/exit gates. The first objection to the said proposed building/developing of the 145 S. Vista Grande property is that the Anaperalta residents has had to bear the financial burden of mitigating damage from a slipping slope and compromised wall at the north end of the HOA property lining Santa Ana Canyon. Several geological companies have assessed the damage to the wall and soil behind it and suggest it is still unstable and may fail. The HOA residents believe that the wall integrity and soil could be further compromised due to the added weight from any additional structures and/or personnel or construction vehicles that would have to access the land to develop additional housing. Given that the original land development hydrology study did not identify the probability of soil slippage, the current knowledge of that defect would likely make Mr. Sidhu and the City of Anaheim responsible for any future slippage if the subdivision is approved. Secondly, since there is currently no access to the property located at 145 S. Vista Grande from Santa Ana Canyon, it can only be assumed that the initial phases of construction will have to access the property through the Vista Grande entrance/exit. This will cause an undue hardship to the residents of the Anaperalta HOA due to numerous large construction vehicles having to drive through our privately owned streets and gates to access the property. Inherently, any large vehicles such as dump trucks or excavator type machines will only damage our newly slurry sealed roads. Again, since Mr. Sidhu and his residents do not pay into the HOA membership, we as residents would be responsible for the repairs to damage caused by the heavy machinery. Regarding a proposed access point on Santa Ana Canyon is that the construction of said access point would have to remove/reroute or otherwise interfere with the current walking/horse trail that runs along the south side of Santa Ana Canyon. This proposal also exacerbates the potential for traffic accidents/congestion along the east bound lanes of Santa Ana Canyon between Royal Oak and Avenida Margarita. Currently there is no break in the median separating east and west bound lanes of Santa Ana Canyon which means that any access to the property would have to be made by making a u-turn at Royal Oak. The current speed limit is 45 MPH on Santa Ana Canyon and where the current access is proposed is less than 50 feet from where Santa Ana Canyon extends from two lanes to three lanes. Construction projects create noise, dust, debris and traffic congestion from large construction vehicles. This will directly affect several of our neighbors, some of which have small children under the age of three, members of the community who have current ongoing health issues which would directly affect their health by the increase in airborne pollution caused by the construction and the overall peace and tranquility that our residents have grown accustomed to over the last 25 years will be significantly eroded by the proposed subdivision. Lastly, several of our residents would also be directly affected by the newly built homes, namely their right to privacy and peace. By adding several homes and roads to the property, often times within feet of the property line, these long time Anaheim residents could potentially lose their views from their property and could potentially be looking into a neighbor’s backyard or at their side of the newly built housing. This is unfair to not only the residents affected by this, but for the new residents who are moving to the desirable community to enjoy real privacy. As a resident of the Anaperalta Community, I ask at this point in time that Mr. Sidhu’s proposed project be tabled for a future planning commission hearing pending Mr. Sidhu providing a current geological survey of the proposed development of the area and how it would affect the potentially compromised wall and soil in the area, a traffic survey of the proposed access from Santa Ana Canyon and how it will affect traffic patterns/congestion, a full detailed plan of exactly what is to be built such as homes (square footage, height, location, etc), where the proposed property lines would be, a full report on the sewage/water/power/cable would be placed and how that would directly affect us, theAnaperalta HOA residents. To avoid a conflict of interest due to the influential nature of Mr. Sidhu’s role as mayor of the City of Anaheim, we kindly request that an Anaperalta HOA Board be allowed to select a geological survey company at Mr. Sidhu’s expense. Please accept this letter as formal communication to the Anaheim Planning Commission that residents of Anaperalta community currently oppose the proposed construction project at this current time of the Sidhu property located at 145 S. Vista Grande and how it has been proposed. Thank you for your time and understanding in this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Craig Barkhouse 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 23, 2022 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2020-00016 LOCATION: 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road (Kindred Community Church) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Kindred Community Church, represented by Doug McAllister and the property owner is Kindred Community Church. The agent is Shelley Thompson of Elements Architecture. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of an amendment to a conditional use permit to modify the church campus. Improvements include the relocation of several modular buildings, an expansion of the main auditorium building, a new trellis structure, a new trash enclosure, and a revitalization of the parking areas. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) By motion, approve the attached resolution determining that the initial study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the proposed project is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Attachment 1); 2) By motion, approve the attached draft resolution for Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E (Attachment 2); BACKGROUND: This property is developed with a church, including modular buildings, a parsonage, a biblical theme garden, a water feature, and an outdoor chapel. The property is located in the SP88-1 (Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan), Development Area 9 (Single-Family Residential) zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates this property and properties to the south, east, and west for Open Space uses. The properties to the southwest are designated for Low-Density Residential land uses, and the SR-91 freeway is located to the north, across Santa Ana Canyon Road. Conditional Use Permit No. 4033 was approved by the Planning Commission in June 1998 and permitted a 29,503 square foot church with an accessory daycare center, fellowship hall, and a multi-purpose building in conjunction with eight modular buildings. In 2004, the Planning Commission approved an amendment to the permit to allow an additional four modular buildings. There are now a total of 12 modular buildings, each used for a variety of purposes, including office space, Sunday school classrooms, and restrooms, on the property. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E May 23, 2022 Page 2 of 5 PROPOSAL: The applicant requests to amend Conditional Use Permit 4033E to allow for site improvements in two phases as described and rendered below. As part of the improvements and changes to the on-site services, the main administrative office operation will be relocated to another office building located within the City of Anaheim which is also owned by Kindred Community Church. Phase One: 1. Relocation of three modular buildings within the campus; 2. Demolition of the existing wings at the existing auditorium building; 3. Construction of a new trellis structure; 4. Construction of a new trash enclosure; 5. Construction of two new mini-plazas adjacent to the auditorium buildings; and 6. Addition of a new “turf” parking lot. Phase Two: 7. Addition of four (4) new modular buildings; 8. Re-pavement and restriping of lower parking lots; and 9. Renovation and expansion of the existing auditorium building by constructing two new wings, a new foyer, storage rooms, and increasing seating capacity from 440 to 620 seats. PHASE 1 AND PHASE 2 N 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 9 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E May 23, 2022 Page 3 of 5 Parking: The church property currently provides 519 parking spaces. To accommodate proposed improvements, 56 existing parking spaces will be removed. A new turf parking lot is proposed to provide 105 new parking spaces. With the new turf parking lot, a total of 575 parking spaces will be provided onsite for all church uses. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan designates this site as a “garden church” facility and states that a church within this portion of the specific plan would be subject to a conditional use permit. The proposed modular units would be compatible with the other structures currently on-site and installed appropriately to meet all State Building Code requirements. Classrooms that are accessory to a church, and not part of a private school, do not require additional parking. The site is well maintained, and there are no outstanding code violations on this property. Parking: The City of Anaheim Municipal Code does not currently have a specific parking rate for community and religious assembly uses, but requires the preparation of a Parking Demand Study. A Parking Demand Study was prepared for the Kindred Community Church expansion project, which included peak hours for both Sunday services and weekday functions. Parking generation rates were then compared to church parking rates for other cities. Once the auditorium expansion is complete, the new seating arrangements will accommodate a total of 620 seats. With the proposed improvements, overall parking for the site will increase from 519 spaces to 575 spaces. Compared to other cities’ rate of 0.333 parking spaces per auditorium seat, the proposed parking ratio for Kindred Community Church is 0.9 parking spaces per seat, which is almost triple the required parking rate for other cities. Traffic/Circulation: A Trip Generation Evaluation (Appendix H to the IS/MND which is included as Attachment 3) was prepared to assess any potential impacts that the campus expansion project may generate. The analysis concluded that there will be an additional three weekday AM peak hour trips and six weekday PM peak hour trips, which is far less than the City threshold of 100 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E May 23, 2022 Page 4 of 5 AM or PM peak hour weekday trips for preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis. In addition, the evaluation concluded that the project would generate an additional 99 Sunday peak trips. City of Anaheim Traffic Engineering staff evaluated the results of the Trip Generation Evaluation and concluded that no further analysis is required. Compatibility: The subject property has operated as a church use since 1998 when the original conditional use permit was approved. The proposed project, including relocation of several modular buildings, expansion of the existing auditorium, and parking lot improvements, are consistent with the originally approved entitlement. Adequate parking, on-site circulation, and access to the site would be provided minimizing any potential impacts to adjoining land uses and would not be detrimental to the health and safety of the surrounding area. Environmental Impact Analysis: An Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to identify necessary mitigation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On March 24, 2022, staff circulated the IS/MND for a 30-day public review period. Staff posted the IS/MND on the City’s web page and uploaded it digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database. A complete hard copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard and the Reference Desk in the Anaheim Public Library located on the Second Floor at 500 West Broadway. Staff prepared a joint Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the IS/MND and Notice of Public Hearing, which was mailed to potentially affected public agencies and interested parties, as well as property owners and tenants within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project. Staff also posted the notice on site and with the Orange County Clerk-Recorder in addition to publication in The Anaheim Bulletin. Attachment 5 provides these comment letters and the associated responses to any CEQA-related issues. None of the comments received resulted in the need to recirculate the IS/MND or to prepare an environmental impact report. Mitigation measures have been identified in the IS/MND to mitigate project impacts relating to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and tribal cultural resources. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, staff recommends the adoption of these mitigation measures as conditions of approval in the attached draft conditional use permit resolution for the approval of the proposed project. With the implementation of these measures, the IS/MND concluded that project impacts will be reduced to levels considered less than significant and there would be no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E May 23, 2022 Page 5 of 5 CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the proposed amendment to the conditional use permit to permit the relocation of existing modular buildings and placement of new modular buildings, additions to the existing auditorium building and several on-site improvements such as parking lot improvements are compatible with the existing and surrounding uses and recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Ivan Orozco Niki Wetzel, AICP Associate Planner Deputy Director of Planning and Building Attachments: 1. Draft MND Resolution 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration with Appendices 4. Project Plans 5. Comments Received and Response to IS/MND Comments [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -1- PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E (DEV2020-00016) (8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E to modify an existing church campus through a two-phase expansion project scope. Improvements include the relocation of several modular buildings, an expansion and renovation of the main auditorium building, a new trellis structure, a new trash enclosure, and a revitalization of the parking areas. (the "Proposed Project") located on that certain real property located at 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 39.57 acres in size and is developed with a church and accessory daycare center. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Open Space land uses. The Property is located in the SP88-1 (Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan), Development Area 9 (Single-Family Residential) zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.102 (Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan No. 88-1) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30-day public/responsible agency review on March 24, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete hard copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard -2- PC2022-*** and the Reference Desk in the Anaheim Public Library located on the Second Floor at 500 West Broadway. The complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was also available on Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database at https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 380"). A complete copy of MMP No. 380 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including MMP No. 380 and the comments received to date and the responses prepared, the Planning Commission, based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related documents and the evidence received concerning the Mitigated Negative Declaration, does find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s CEQA Procedures and, together with MMP No. 380, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project. 2. That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project. 3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impacts upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 380 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. -3- PC2022-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the evidence received to date, does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) and find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures and, together with MMP No. 380, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 380 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; 3. That the Planning Commission approve and adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 380; and 4. That the Planning Commission authorize and direct City staff to file with the Clerk of the County of Orange a Notice of Determination in accordance with Section 15075(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. -4- PC2022-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -5- PC2022-*** I, Stephanie Rodriguez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 23, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of May, 2022. ____________________________________ SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit B -6- KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 Terms and Definitions 1. Property Owner/Developer Any owner or developer of real property within the Kindred Church Expansion Project site. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Timing This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -7- Mitigation Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MM BIO-1 During construction To avoid impacts to nesting birds and raptors, construction should be scheduled between September 1 and February 14, which is outside the peak nesting season. If construction and/or vegetation removal must occur during the peak nesting season (i.e., February 15– August 31), a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within seven days prior to the start of Project construction activities. If the Biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to the construction area, the Biologist will identify an appropriate protective buffer zone around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species, the nature of the construction activity, and the amount of existing disturbance in the vicinity. In general, the Biologist shall designate a buffer between 10 to 300 feet for common nesting birds, between 200 to 500 feet for common nesting raptors, and a minimum of 500 feet for any nesting special status bird species. No construction activities shall be allowed within the buffer until the nest is deemed to be no longer active by the Biologist to ensure compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. Planning and Building Department MM BIO-2 During construction To avoid impacts on maternity roosting bats, tree removal shall occur outside the bat maternity season (i.e., April through August) to the extent feasible. In addition, a preconstruction roost emergence survey shall be conducted no more than one year prior to the start of Project vegetation removal associated with construction by a qualified biologist. Trees and/or structures that are being used by roosting bats and those within 100 feet of an active roost may not be removed during the maternity season to avoid impacts on an active maternity roost, which may include juvenile bats that cannot fly. Planning and Building Department CULTURAL RESOURCES Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -8- Mitigation Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and during construction Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City that the applicant has retained an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary. The archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance within previously undisturbed soils, and shall establish, in cooperation with the applicant, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. If archaeological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the archaeologist and City shall be notified immediately. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the archeologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. Planning and Building Department GEOLOGY AND SOILS RR CUL-1 During construction If human remains are found during ground-disturbing activities, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The County Coroner shall be notified of the discovery immediately. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, s/he shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours of the discovery. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site by the City. The City would meet and confer with the most likely descendant regarding their recommendations prior to disturbing the site by further construction activity. Planning and Building Department Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -9- MM GEO-1 During construction In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the contractor shall contact the City immediately. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find, and in consultation with the City, determine an appropriate course of action. If the paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. Planning and Building Department Mitigation Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RR HAZ-1 Ongoing during project construction and operations Activities at the Project site shall comply with existing federal, State, and local regulations regarding hazardous material use, storage, disposal, and transport to prevent Projectrelated risks to public health and safety. All on-site generated waste that meets hazardous waste criteria shall be stored, manifested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22) and in a manner to the satisfaction of the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), as applicable. Any hazardous materials removed from the Project site shall be transported only by a Licensed Hazardous Waste Hauler, who shall be in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act) and Title 40, Section 263 (Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) of the Code of Federal Regulations; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards; and Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) standards. Planning and Building Department TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -10- MM TCR-1 Prior to the commencement of grading and/or construction, and during construction Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes on Planning and Building Department Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -11- Mitigation Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes MM TCR-2 Prior to the commencement of grading and/or construction, and during construction Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Planning and Building Department Kindred Church Expansion Project KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 380 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\MMP\Kindred-Church_MMP-032122.docx Mitigation Monitoring Program -12- Mitigation Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2020-00016) (8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E to modify an existing church campus through a two-phase expansion project scope. Improvements include the relocation of several modular buildings, an expansion and renovation of the main auditorium building, a new trellis structure, a new trash enclosure, and a revitalization of the parking areas. (the "Proposed Project"), located on that certain real property located at 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 39.57 acres in size and is developed with a church and accessory daycare center. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Open Space land uses. The Property is located in the SP88-1 (Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan), Development Area 9 (Single-Family Residential) zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.102 (Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan No. 88-1) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property; and WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 30-day public/responsible agency review on March 24, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete hard copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard and the Reference Desk in the Anaheim Public Library located on the Second Floor at 500 West - 2 - Broadway. The complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration was also available on Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database at https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .060 (Findings) of Section 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E: 1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code because the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) allows community and religious uses subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area because the project site is currently operating as a church facility and has done so since 1998. Furthermore, the church use is compatible with the surrounding single-family residential and commercial land uses in the vicinity. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use are adequate to allow the proposed church expansion project, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the Project will enhance on-site vehicle circulation and pedestrian connectivity between buildings. The Proposed Project will provide similar-type buildings that are adequately setback from the surrounding developments to which have been compatible with surrounding neighborhoods since the church use was originally approved in 1998. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed church expansion project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways. City staff has reviewed a Trip Generation Evaluation Report and has determined that the increase in vehicle trips does not require additional traffic analysis for this project per the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will continue to provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED t that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim does approve Conditional Use Permit No. 4033E the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with - 3 - conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon the applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) - 4 - I, Stephanie Rodriguez, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 23, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of May, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4033E, (DEV2020-00016) - 6 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City that the applicant has retained an Orange County- certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary. The archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance within previously undisturbed soils, and shall establish, in cooperation with the applicant, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. If archaeological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the archaeologist and City shall be notified immediately. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the archeologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. (MM CUL-1, MMP No. 380) Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 The Owner/Developer shall prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 3 The Owner/Developer shall prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 4 The developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of any permits. Public Works, Development Services 5 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 6 The OWNER shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services - 7 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 The owner shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services 8 The Owner/Developer shall submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term ongoing maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Public Works, Development Services 9 The Owner/Developer shall submit a Preliminary Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 10 Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. (MM TCR-1, MMP No. 380) 11 Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground- disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 9 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. (MM TCR- 2, MMP No. 380) 12 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 13 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim the following easements: An easement to establish a 49-foot half street width from the NEW street centerline of Santa Ana Canyon Road per City standard 170. Public Works, Development Services 14 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right- of-way. Public Works, Development Services 15 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim’s adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works, Development Services - 10 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 16 Submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works, Development Services 17 All proposed structures shall not be in conflict with existing easements. Construction within all easements shall be approved by the easement holder. Public Works, Development Services 18 A cash-in-lieu payment based on the project engineer’s cost estimate, in an amount determined by the City Engineer to be sufficient to pay for future street widening along Santa Ana Canyon Road, shall be paid to the City of Anaheim. Public Works, Development Services PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 19 If human remains are found during ground-disturbing activities, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The County Coroner shall be notified of the discovery immediately. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, s/he shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours of the discovery. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site by the City. The City would meet and confer with the most likely descendant regarding their recommendations prior to disturbing the site by further construction activity. (RR CUL-1, MMP No. 380) Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 20 In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth- disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the contractor shall contact the City immediately. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find, and in consultation with the City, determine an appropriate course of action. If the paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. (MM GEO-1, MMP No. 380) Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 21 Activities at the Project site shall comply with existing federal, State, and local regulations regarding hazardous material use, storage, disposal, and transport to prevent Project- related risks to public health and safety. All on- site generated waste that meets hazardous waste criteria shall be stored, manifested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22) and in a manner to the satisfaction of the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), as applicable. Any hazardous materials removed from the Project site shall be transported only by a Licensed Hazardous Waste Hauler, who shall be in compliance with all Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 11 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT applicable State and federal requirements, including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act) and Title 40, Section 263 (Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) of the Code of Federal Regulations; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards; and Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) standards. (RR HAZ-1, MMP No. 380) 22 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to the final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 23 All remaining fees/deposits required by the Public Works Department shall be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services 24 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted by the Applicant for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works, Development Services GENERAL 25 To avoid impacts to nesting birds and raptors, construction should be scheduled between September 1 and February 14, which is outside the peak nesting season. If construction and/or vegetation removal must occur during the peak nesting season (i.e., February 15– August 31), a pre construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within seven days prior to the start of Project construction activities. If the Biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to the construction area, the Biologist will identify an appropriate protective buffer zone around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species, the nature of the construction activity, and the amount of existing disturbance in the vicinity. In general, the Biologist shall designate a buffer between 10 to 300 feet for common nesting birds, between 200 to 500 feet for common nesting raptors, and a minimum of 500 feet for any nesting special status bird species. No construction activities shall be allowed within the buffer until the nest is deemed to be no longer active by the Biologist to ensure compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. (MM BIO-1, MMP No. 380) Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 26 To avoid impacts on maternity roosting bats, tree removal shall occur outside the bat maternity season (i.e., April through August) to the extent feasible. In addition, a pre- construction roost emergence survey shall be conducted no more than one year prior to the start of Project vegetation removal associated with construction by a qualified biologist. Trees and/or structures that are being used by roosting bats and those within 100 feet of an active roost may not be removed during the maternity season to avoid impacts on an active maternity roost, which may include juvenile bats that cannot fly. (MM BIO-2, MMP No. 380) Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 27 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the Planning and Building Department, - 12 - NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning Services Division 28 The Owner/Developer is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 29 The Applicant/Owner/Developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant/Owner/Developer’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 30 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 23 Ongoing during project operations, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site. Delivery vehicles shall not block any part of the public right of way. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 24 Vehicle gates shall not be installed across the project driveways or access roads without providing a vehicle turnaround area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Traffic Engineering Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Kindred Church Expansion Project Development Project Number: DEV2020-00016 Prepared for Planning Services Division City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by Psomas 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300 Santa Ana, California 92707-8794 March 2022 Attachment 3 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of The Initial Study.................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Summary of Findings .............................................................................. 1-1 1.3 Public Review ......................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Report Organization................................................................................ 1-2 Section 2.0 Project Location, Background, and Environmental Setting ......................... 2-1 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Project site Conditions .............................................................. 2-1 2.3 Surrounding Land Uses .......................................................................... 2-2 Section 3.0 Project Description .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Physical Characteristics .......................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Phase 1 ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Phase 2 ....................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Discretionary Actions .................................................................. 3-5 Section 4.0 Environmental Checklist.................................................................................. 4-1 Section 5.0 Environmental Evaluation ............................................................................... 5-1 I. Aesthetics ............................................................................................... 5-1 II. Agriculture and Forest Land Resources ................................................. 5-4 III. Air Quality ............................................................................................... 5-5 IV. Biological Resources ............................................................................ 5-19 V. Cultural Resources ............................................................................... 5-22 VI. Energy .................................................................................................. 5-25 VII. Geology and Soils................................................................................. 5-28 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 5-33 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................... 5-38 X. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ 5-42 XI. Land Use and Planning ........................................................................ 5-45 XII. Mineral Resources ................................................................................ 5-47 XIII. Noise .................................................................................................... 5-48 XIV. Population and Housing ........................................................................ 5-57 XV. Public Services ..................................................................................... 5-58 XVI. Recreation ............................................................................................ 5-61 XVII. Transportation....................................................................................... 5-62 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx ii Table of Contents XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources ..................................................................... 5-63 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................... 5-67 XX. Wildfire .................................................................................................. 5-70 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................... 5-72 Section 6.0 Preparers ........................................................................................................... 6-1 Section 7.0 References ........................................................................................................ 7-1 TABLES Table Page 1 Project Construction Schedule ....................................................................................... 3-5 2 California and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................................... 5-6 3 Air Quality Monitoring Data from the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Monitoring Station .......... 5-8 4 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin............................ 5-9 5 South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Significance Thresholds ..... 5-10 6 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions ..................................................... 5-13 7 Localized Significance Threshold Construction Emissions .......................................... 5-14 8 Peak Daily Operational Emissions ............................................................................... 5-15 9 Energy Use During Construction .................................................................................. 5-27 10 Transportation Energy (Gallons/year) .......................................................................... 5-28 11 Energy from Utilities ..................................................................................................... 5-28 12 Estimated GreenHouse Gas Emissions from Construction.......................................... 5-36 13 Estimated Annual GreenHouse Gas Emissions from Project Operation ...................... 5-36 14 Estimated Total Project Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................... 5-37 15 Typical Noise Levels .................................................................................................... 5-48 16 Land Use Compatibility for Noise Exposure ................................................................. 5-52 17 Monitored Noise Levels ................................................................................................ 5-53 18 Construction Noise Levels at Noise-Sensitive Uses .................................................... 5-54 19 Vibration Levels Per Construction Equipment .............................................................. 5-55 20 Vibration Annoyance Criteria at Sensitive Uses ........................................................... 5-56 21 Building Damage Criteria at Sensitive Uses ................................................................ 5-56 22 City of Anaheim Fire Services Facilities ....................................................................... 5-59 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx iii Table of Contents EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page 1 Vicinity Map .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2 Aerial Photograph .......................................................................................................... 2-1 3 Existing Site Photographs .............................................................................................. 2-1 4 Overall Site Plan ............................................................................................................ 3-1 5 Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 1 ........................... 3-1 6 Demolition Plan for Upper Plaza .................................................................................... 3-1 7 Demolition Plan for Auditorium ....................................................................................... 3-1 8 Upper Plaza Materials and Finishes .............................................................................. 3-1 9a Sheet Index Plan from Grading Plan .............................................................................. 3-2 9b Section Details and Notes from Grading Plan ................................................................ 3-2 10 Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 2 ........................... 3-2 11 Proposed Site Plan for Lower Portion of Site with Implementation of Phase 2 .............. 3-2 12 Auditorium Renovation Plan ........................................................................................... 3-3 13 Auditorium Elevations .................................................................................................... 3-3 14 Auditorium Materials and Finishes ................................................................................. 3-3 15 Internal Circulation and Parking Improvements ............................................................. 3-3 16a–c Conceptual Landscape Plan .......................................................................................... 3-4 17 Water Quality Best Management Practices ................................................................... 3-4 18 Noise Monitoring Locations .......................................................................................... 5-53 APPENDICES Appendix A Air Quality Calculations B Biological Resources Constraints Analysis C Energy Calculations D Soils Report E EDR Radius Map Report F Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) G Construction Noise Calculations H Trip Generation Memorandum I Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Memorandum Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx iv Table of Contents This page intentionally left blank Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 1-1 Introduction SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and its Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §15000 et seq.), this Initial Study (IS) has been prepared as documentation for a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Kindred Church Expansion Project (Project). This IS includes a description of the Project; location of the Project site; evaluation of the potential environmental impacts; findings from the environmental review; and proposed mitigation measures to lessen or avoid environmental impacts on the environment. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim (City) is the lead agency for the Project. The lead agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project. The City, as the lead agency, shall have the authority for project approval and adoption of the accompanying environmental documentation. The purpose of this document is to evaluate the Project relative to each of the environmental topic areas contained in the CEQA Guidelines. Overall, the Project consists of the expansion of the existing Kindred Community Church. The Project would be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would include partial demolition of an existing auditorium structure; relocation of modular buildings and a multipurpose fabric structure; development of two mini-plazas; establishment of an upper plateau campus area within the existing church footprint; the addition of outdoor lighting and landscaping; and the addition of a new parking lot. Phase 2 would include the remodeling and expansion of the existing auditorium with two new wings to provide additional seating and back- of-house areas; four new modular buildings; parking lot improvements, and addition of a monument sign, landscaping, outdoor lighting, and a pedestrian pathway. A more detailed project description is provided below in Section 3.0. 1.2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Based on the environmental checklist form prepared for the Project (included in Section 4.0, Environmental Checklist) and supporting environmental analysis (provided in Section 5.0, Environmental Evaluation), the Project would have no impact or a less than significant impact on the environmental impact areas listed below. Aesthetics; Agriculture and Forest Resources; Air Quality; Energy; Greenhouse Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and Planning; Mineral Resources; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Recreation; Transportation; Utilities and Service Systems; and Wildfire Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 1-2 Introduction The Project has the potential to have significant impacts to the environmental impact areas listed below: Biological Resources; Cultural Resources; Geology and Soils; and Tribal Cultural Resources However, this IS identifies recommended mitigation measures that would reduce identified potential impacts, to less than significant, when incorporated into the Project. According to the State CEQA Guidelines, it is appropriate to prepare an MND for the Project because implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would eliminate or reduce potentially significant environmental impacts of the Project to a less than significant level. 1.3 PUBLIC REVIEW The public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) in accordance with Section 15073(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines is March 24, 2022 to April 25, 2022. The City has mailed the Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt a MND for the Project by mail to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the Project site pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.60.100 (Notice of Public Hearing). This noticing is in accordance with Section 15072 (a) and (b) of the CEQA Guidelines. The IS/MND is available for public review on the City of Anaheim website (www.anaheim.net); the Anaheim Planning and Building Department (200 South Anaheim Boulevard); the Anaheim Central Library (500 West Broadway) and the East Anaheim Branch Library (8201 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road). In reviewing the IS/MND, the reviewer should focus on the sufficiency of the document in identifying and analyzing the potential impacts of the Project on the environment and the ways in which the potentially significant effects are avoided or mitigated. Comments on the analysis contained herein may be sent to: Mr. Andy T. Uk, Associate Planner City of Anaheim Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Email: auk@anaheim.net Following receipt and evaluation of comments from agencies, organizations and/or individuals, the City will determine whether these comments have raised any substantial new environmental issues. If not, or if the new issues do not provide substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, the Planning Commission and City Council will consider the approval of the Project and environmental documentation. 1.4 REPORT ORGANIZATION This document has the following sections: Section 1 – Introduction. This section includes a discussion of the purpose of this IS, as well as a summary of findings, and a discussion of the public review process. Section 2 – Project Location, Background, and Environmental Setting. This section provides an overview of the Project location, as well as a description of existing on-site and surrounding land uses. Section 3 – Project Description. This section identifies key characteristics of the Project and includes a list of anticipated discretionary actions. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 1-3 Introduction Section 4 – Environmental Checklist. The completed City of Anaheim Environmental Checklist Form provides an overview of the potential impacts that may or may not result from the Project. Section 5 – Environmental Evaluation. This section contains an analysis of environmental impacts identified in the environmental checklist. As necessary, mitigation measures (MMs) have been included following the environmental analysis for each resource topic. Section 6 – Report Preparers. This section identifies those individuals responsible for preparing the IS/MND. Section 7 – References. This section identifies resources used to prepare this document. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 1-4 Introduction This page intentionally Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 2-1 Project Location, Background, and Environmental Setting SECTION 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION, BACKGROUND, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The Project site encompasses approximately 14.79 acres and is located at 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, approximately 1.1 miles east of Weir Canyon Road, and approximately 0.71-mile west of Gypsum Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim in Orange County. The Project site consists of a portion of Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 354-321-01, as well as all of APNs 514-101-28 and 514-091-25. The Project would also construct off-site improvements consisting of a storm drain pipe and two underground stormwater infiltration chambers within a portion of APN 354- 321-03, which is downslope and adjacent to the Project site. The Project site is depicted in a vicinity map, which is provided as Exhibit 1. 2.2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS Kindred Community Church is currently located on the Project site. The General Plan designates the Project site for Open Space land use. The majority of the property is located within the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) Zone; however, a small portion (approximately two acres) is located within The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) Zone, and 3.61 acres within the “T” Transition zone. The entire property is within the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone. SP88-1 designates this site as a “garden church” facility; however, SP88-1 does not include detailed standards or procedures for the development of a church within any development area in the specific plan. The specific plan does state that a church within this portion of the specific plan would be subject to a separate entitlement process, which was satisfied through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The City originally approved the church in 1988 as a semi- enclosed “garden church” by CUP 3032. In 1998, the City subsequently approved the existing church by CUP 4033. This CUP permitted a 29,503-square foot church with accessory day care center, fellowship hall, and multi-purpose building in conjunction with existing modular buildings. The City subsequently amended the CUP in 1998 to add a parsonage home, in 2004 to allow additional 5,611 square feet to the fellowship hall, and in 2008 to add three modular units for Sunday school classrooms. The existing church facilities include a 29,503-square foot worship center, a day care center, a fellowship hall, a multi-purpose building, modular buildings, four parking lots containing a total of 376 parking spaces1, a welcome tent, an amphitheater/outdoor chapel, an artificial lake, a mechanical building, a modular residence with garage, a garage/maintenance building, and outdoor lighting. A County fire road is located in the northeastern portion of the Project site. There are two easements for a storm drain and a water main, which run parallel through the southern portion of the Project site. The northwestern portion of the Project site is undeveloped with the exception of a dirt road that leads to a cross at the top of the hill. The aerial photograph provided as Exhibit 2 depicts the Project site and its immediate surroundings. Photographs of existing conditions within the Project site are depicted in existing site photographs provided in Exhibit 3. 1 An additional 143 parking spaces are located off-site to the northeast within APN 354-321-03, for a total of 519 parking spaces. UV91 UV241 La Palma A v e de BryantS e r r a n o A v eWei r C a n y o n R d Santa Ana Canyon Rd Kodiak Mountain DrGypsum Canyon RdWei r C a n y o n R d At and SF Ra i l r o a d Chino Hills State Park Chino Hills State Park Featherly Regional Park Featherly Regional Park Toyon Park East Side Community Park Sycamore Park Box Canyon Park Brush Canyon Park Weir Canyon Regional Park Jean Woodard Park Bryant Ranch Elementary School Running Springs Elem School D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\ISMND\ex_Vicinity_20220105.mxd² Seal Beach Project Location §¨605 ST241 ST90 ST261 ST142ST72 ST60 ST71 ST55 ST57 ST241 Los AngelesOrange BeachHuntington West Covina Buena Park Yorba Linda Costa Mesa Irvine Westminster Santa Ana Santa Corona Rancho Margarita Whittier Ontario Vicinity Map Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Exhibit 1 (Rev: 01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Vicinity.pdf 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet Project Boundary Aerial Photograph Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Exhibit 2 (Rev: 01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Aerial.pdf ParkingLot 1 ParkingLot 2 ParkingLot 3 ParkingLot 4 ParkingLot 5 Santa Ana Canyon Rd EWindso n g Dr C e d a r P o i n t Dr CrownviewWay G a rd e n V ie w D rE F o x h o l l o w Dr UV91 D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\ex_Aerial_20210505.mxd300 0 300150 Feet² Aerial Source: Esri, Maxar 2020 Project Boundary Off-site Stormwater Improvements Source: Elements Architecture, 2021M. Steven CampLOOKING EAST TOWARD SITE ENTRYEXISTING MONUMENT SIGN AT SITE ENTRYDRIVEWAY TO OVERFLOW PARKING LOT #7PEDSTRIAN PATH FROM SITE ENTRY LOOKING SOUTHPARKING LOT #6 LOOKING NORTHPARKING LOT #5 LOOKING SOUTHPARKING LOT #1 LOOKING WESTMAIN AUDITORIUM AND FABRIC BUILDING LOOKING WESTPARKING LOT #2 LOOKING EASTPARKING LOT #4 LOOKING EASTEXISITNG POND / FUTURE PARKING LOT #3 LOOKING NORTHAERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Existing_SitePhotos.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Existing_SitePhotos_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Existing Site Photographs Exhibit 3 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 2-2 Project Location, Background, and Environmental Setting 2.3 SURROUNDING LAND USES The General Plan designates the properties located adjacent to the Project site for Open Space and Low Density Residential land use. The properties include the following existing land uses: East Santa Ana Canyon Road and State Route (SR) 91 to the north; A vacant, previously developed parcel (APN 354-321-03) to the northeast; Two open space parcels with stormwater brow ditches upslope to the south; Undeveloped land (APN 514-012-18) to the east; Undeveloped land (APN 354-251-02) to the west; and Single-Family Residential to the southwest Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-1 Project Description SECTION 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The Project consists of two phases to expand the existing Kindred Community Church. The Project’s proposed total additional square footage is 9,839 square feet with an increase of 180 seats in seating capacity within the auditorium. An overall site plan showing both phases of development is provided as Exhibit 4. 3.1.1 PHASE 1 Phase 1 of the Project includes the relocation of modular structures, demolition of portions of the auditorium building, relocation of an existing fabric tent, the establishment of a centralized campus at the top of the Project site, and the addition of a new parking lot, as further described below and as depicted in Exhibit 5, Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 1. Relocation of Modular Structures The Project would relocate three existing modular structures to a consolidated location adjacent to the auditorium building, in a campus separated from vehicular traffic. Interior tenant improvements would also be completed for these three modular structures consisting of fire sprinklers, finishes, and lighting. Structures that would be relocated are identified in Exhibit 6, Demolition Plan for Upper Plaza. Demolition of Portions of the Auditorium Building The Project would demolish two wings of the auditorium building totaling approximately 911 square feet to prepare for Phase 2 additions. This portion of the Project would also include the demolition of one small modular structure, located east of the existing fabric tent and auditorium building. These modifications are depicted in Exhibit 7, Demolition Plan for Auditorium. Relocation of Existing Fabric Tent The Project would relocate an existing 22-foot tall, 4,512-square foot multi-purpose fabric structure used as a fellowship hall to the northeast portion of the site. Structures that would be relocated are identified in Exhibit 6, Demolition Plan for Upper Plaza. Establishment of an Upper Plateau Campus The Project would create a campus area within the upper plateau of the Project site. This would include development of two “mini-plazas” in the upper plateau area that the church would use as fellowship areas for children and adult ministry activities. The Project would also update this portion of the Project site to include a new “front porch” trellis structure that would encourage fellowship at the front edge of the plateau looking out over the Project site. The trellis structure would be 14-foot 6-inches high, and constructed of a 6-inch steel tube frame with a rust-colored powder coat finish. The Project would install decorative, semi-enclosed lattice screening structures up to 17 feet in height around the relocated fabric structure as well as around one of the “mini-plazas” to screen and define the various use areas. In addition, the Project would add a seating area around an existing tree located in a central location of the upper plateau area. The Project would also include modifications to the existing driveway leading to the on-site residence; and demolition and replacement of a trash enclosure. Materials and finishes for the “mini-plazas” and trellis structure are depicted in Exhibit 8, Upper Plaza Materials and Finishes. Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Overall_SitePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Overall_SitePlan_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Overall Site Plan Exhibit 4:&***SITE PLAN AT LOWER PARKING LOTSPROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA:&2*:&*)*PHASE 1PHASE 2 91 FREEWAY SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD EXISTING RENOVATED AUDITORIUM WITH NEW ADDITIONS NEW TRELLIS STRUCTURENEW & RELOCATED MODULAR STRUCTURES TO CREATE CONSOLIDATED AND SAFE CAMPUSNEW PARKING LOTEXISTING RE-STRIPED & LANDSCAPED PARKING LOTNEW DECORATIVE SCREENEXISTING TRANSFORMERAPN 354-251-0137.12 ACRESAPN 354-321-03APN 354-321-03EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997M. Steven Camp1" = 80'-0"NORTHAREA TABULATIONSTOTAL AREA644,252 SFPERVIOUS AREAEXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 325,435 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA50.5% -37,846 SFPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 287,589 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA44.6%IMPERVIOUS AREAEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA318,817 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA49.5% +37,846 SFPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA356,663 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA55.4% Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_UpperPlaza.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_UpperPlaza_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 1Exhibit 5EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 3EXISTING RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING(FELLOWSHIP HALL)NEW "TURF" PARKING LOTENLARGED PARKING LOT WITH NEW PAVING & STRIPINGMODIFIED ACCESS TO UPPER RESIDENCEMODIFIED PARKING LOT WITH NEW STRIPINGNEW CIRCULAR DECORATIVE SCREENNEW TRELLIS STRUCTURENEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND AISLESEXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 2EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 1TRELLIS100' - 0"TRELLIS60' - 0"62' - 0"12' - 1"62' - 0"38' - 0"NEW CIRCULAR WOOD SEATING AT TREE, TYP. OF (2):&*/*:&*/+66' - 6"60' - 0"22' - 8"EXISTING AUDITORIUMPARKING LOT 3PARKING LOT 2(65 STALLS)PARKING LOT 1(78 STALLS):&*/,EXISTING RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT14'-6" H15'-6" H(3) STALLS31,835 SF(105 STALLS)*) A4+%,./L?*) A4+%,./L?++ A4*)%-./L?:IIKHQ++ A4-%.*+L?:IIKHQ*) A4*%/*+L?NEW DECORATIVE SCREEN AT RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING (HEIGHT = 17''-0")NEW TRASH ENCLOSURENEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO FUTURE MODULARSRE-STRIPED EXISTING PARKING STALLSRE-STRIPED EXISTING PARKING STALLS(1-WAY)12' - 0"25' - 0"2 5 ' - 0 " (6 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A . @ 8'-6" EA.(3) STALLS(8 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A .(8) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA. @ 8'-6" EA.(7) STALLS@ 8'-6" EA.(6) STALLS(8) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.26' - 10"@ 8'-6" EA.(6) STALLSNEW CONCRETE WALK (260 SF)NOTE: RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDINGSHALL FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PERMANENT STRUCTURE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE1 8 ' - 0 "TYP.18' - 0"TYP.9' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"18' - 0"16'-4" @ 30 DEG.TYP18' - 0"TYP9' - 0"TYP5' - 0"8' - 0"(9) STALLS AT +/- 9'-5" EA.86' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"EXISTING STORM DRAIN -PROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING WATER MAIN25' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 3 7 ' - 0 "TRASH TRUCK CIRCULATION -SHOWN DASHED25' - 0"(4 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A .EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997WOOD SLAT BENCH WITH ACCESSIBLE WHEELCHAIR TRANSFER CLEAR SPACE, TYP. EXISTING RELOCATED BACKFLOW DEVICE25' - 0"2' - 0"NEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS 1 & 2, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFO5' - 6"?'?'6+ &):;HO>@K:=>?'?'6+ &):;HO>@K:=>?'?'6+ &/:;HO>@K:=>(7 ) S T A L L S (7 ) S T A L L S(4) STALLS(9 ) S T A L L S(7 ) S TAL L S(8) STALLS(4) STALLS(9 ) S TA LLS(5) STALLSEXISTING FOUNTAIN24' - 0"60' - 1"2' - 0"27' - 9"30' - 2":&++*ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANNEW FIRE HYDRANTM. Steven CampNORTH1" = 30'-0"NOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTSPHASE 1DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK• RELOCATE (4) EXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS• MODIFY EXISTING "UPPER PLAZA" INCLUDING CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING• ADD TRELLIS STRUCTURE, (2) DECORATIVE SCREENS, AND VARIOUS SITE FURNITURE & LIGHTING ELEMENTS AT "UPPER PLAZA"• MODIFY BOUNDARY OF, RE-PAVE & STRIPE PARKING LOTS 1 & 2 -SEE PARKING PLAN FOR MORE INFO• ADD NEW TURF PARKING LOT 3 -SEE PARKING PLAN FOR MORE INFOTOTAL ADDED BUILT AREA(NONE) Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_DemoPlan_UpperPlaza.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_DemoPlan_UpperPlaza_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Demolition Plan for Upper Plaza Exhibit 6AAAAAAAA2A2 A 2 A2AA2AA2A2AAAAEEEBEEEAAC45191919BFDWM2'DN3'DN4.8'DNEX. SD LINE EX. SD LINEEX. SD LINE AA AAABBBBBA A BBBBBBA 2A 2A BBBBBEXISTING AUDITORIUMEXISTING MODULAR BUILDING TO REMAIN, TYP. U.N.O.EXISTING FABRIC BUILDING TO BE RELOCATEDEXISTING DRIVEWAY TO RESIDENCE BE RE-CONFIGUREDEXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS TO BE RE-LOCATEDEXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE EXTENDED, RE-PAVED AND RE-STRIPEDEXISTING LANDSCAPING & POND TO BE REMOVED; FOR FUTURE PARKING LOTEXISTING LANDSCAPED AREA & PLAYGROUND TO REMAINEXISTING PAVILIONS AT AUDITORIUM TO BE REMOVED FOR FUTURE ADDITIONSEXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE PARTIALLY RE-PAVED AND RE-STRIPEDEXISTING UPPER PLAZA TO BE ENLARGED, WITH CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING -EXTENTS SHOWN WITH RED HATCHEXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING AT UPPER PLAZA TO BE MODIFIED -SEE PROPOSED PLANS FOR MORE INFOEXISTING CHILDREN'S CLASSROOM BUILDINGS:IIKHQ*)&*+ A4/%*-+L?MHM:EEXISTING ADULT CLASSROOM BUILDINGS:IIKHQ*) A4/%,+-L?MHM:E++ A4*)%-./L?EXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 138 SPACES)EXISTING NURSERY BUILDING :IIKHQ*, A4,%0--L?EXISTING ELECTRICAL ROOMEXISTING STORAGEEXISTING STORAGEAPPROX 10' H; 1,863 SF APPROX 10' H; 1,755 SF EXISTING GARAGEEXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALL FABRIC STRUCTURE:IIKHQ++ A4-%.*+L?E X I S T I N G M E D I A B UI L D I N G :I I K H Q 1 A 4 *%))1 L ?EXISTING STORM DRAIN -PROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 60 SPACES)EXISTING UPPER PLAZA TO BE ENLARGED, WITH CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING -EXTENTS SHOWN WITH RED HATCHDEMO EXIST TRASH ENCLOSUREEXISTING STALLS TO BE RE-STRIPEDEXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAINEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATEDEXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997EXISTING BACKFLOW DEVICE TO BE RELOCATED2.44M. Steven Camp1" = 30'-0"NORTHNOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTS Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_DemoPlan_Auditorium.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_DemoPlan_Auditorium_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Demolition Plan for Auditorium Exhibit 7REAR EXTERIOR WALL & SLAB TO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FOR NEW BACK OF HOUSE ADDITIONEXISTING PLATFORM TO BE REPLACEDEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO BE MODIFIED FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO BE MODIFIED FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED HVAC EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN -TYP.OPENINGS AT EXISTING ENTRY FEATURE TO BE MADE LARGEREXISTING INTERIOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE INCREASED VISIBILITY TO PLATFORM -TYP.EXISTING AUDIO-VISUAL CONTROL BOOTH TO BE REPLACEDAUDITORIUMWOMENMENVESTIBULECRY ROOMKITCHENSTORAGEELECT.MECHMECH.EXISTING INTERIOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE LARGER FOYER SPACE AND WELCOME KIOSKRISEREXISTING PAVILION TO BE REMOVED IN COMPLETE, FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING PAVILION TO BE REMOVED IN COMPLETE, FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING RESTROOMS TO BE RENOVATED440 SEATSM. Steven CampTOTAL EXISTING AREA:TOTAL DEMOLISHED AREA: 10,456 SF -911 SF AREA TABULATIONS Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Materials_UpperPlaza.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Materials_UpperPlaza_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Upper Plaza Materials and Finishes Exhibit 8AAABCCBM. Steven CampSHERWIN WILLIAMS POWDURA POWDER-COAT "PRB2-C0001 RUST"METAL FINISH14'-6" HIGH, 6" TUBE STEEL FRAME WITH POWDER-COATED FINISH DECORATIVE METAL LATTICE WITH POWDER-COATED FINISH SEATING ELEMENT AT TREEREFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL INFORMATION CONCERNING LANDSCAPE & HARDSCAPE MATERIALSTRELLIS STRUCTURECIRCULAR SCREENLAYERED BRICK BENCH CONSTRUCTIONSOLID WOOD PLANK AT BENCH SEATLAYERED BRICKCEDAR PLANK123MATERIALS & FINISHES Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-2 Project Description Retaining Wall The Project would include construction of a two-foot retaining wall on a portion of the southern edge of the Project site that would range from 1.5 feet to 4 feet in height. West of the sanctuary, an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ramp with retaining walls would be constructed. A new 3.5-foot to 4-foot block retaining wall would be constructed in the parking lot located west of auditorium. New retaining walls are shown in Exhibit 9a, Sheet Index Plan from Grading Plan and Exhibit 9b, Section Details and Notes from Grading Plan. Phase 1 Parking Area Improvements During Phase 1, Parking Lot Number 1 (see Exhibit 2, Aerial Photograph) would be partially re- paved and re-striped and a new fire hydrant would be added. Parking Lot Number 2 would be expanded, re-paved and re-striped. An existing backflow preventer and fire hydrant would be relocated within Parking Lot Number 2, the existing trash enclosure would be removed, and a new trash enclosure would be constructed. The existing lower pond and associated landscaping would be replaced by a temporary, permeable turf parking lot, which would be referred to as Parking Lot Number 3. New sections would be added to an existing concrete walkway that connects the proposed Parking Lot Number 3 and the upper plateau area. The temporary permeable parking lot (e.g., Parking Lot Number 3) would be paved and striped in Phase 2, as detailed below. Tree Removals There are approximately 83 trees within the Project site, most of which would be protected in place and retained as part of the Project. A total of 29 trees would be removed, consisting of a variety of ornamental species, with the exception of one Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia). The Project would include the planting of 88 new trees over phases 1 and 2. Lighting The Project would replace existing pole mounted light fixtures within the Project site with modern, downcast fixture heads. The Project would also add pole-mounted lights with new light fixture heads in parking lots and other circulation areas. The Project would install bollard pathway lights throughout the Project site, post-mounted accent lights at the circular screen and tree seating areas, and trellis-mounted micro-profile lighting fixtures to the new trellis structure. 3.1.2 PHASE 2 Phase 2 of the Project would construct a remodeled auditorium with two new wings providing additional seating and back-of-house areas; four new modular buildings; a remodeled parking lot; and, addition of a monument sign, landscaping, and a pedestrian pathway, as further described below and as depicted in Exhibit 10, Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 2, and Exhibit 11, Proposed Site Plan for Lower Portion of Site with Implementation of Phase 2. Additional Modular Structures The Project would install an additional four modular structures totaling 5,594 square feet that would be located east and northeast of the fabric tent and auditorium. The proposed structures would include installation of fire sprinklers and additional ADA requirements where applicable, such as modified and new ramps and/or stairs to access elevated modular structures; general accessibility to interiors including door push/pull clearances; clear floor space and reach range Source: Anacal Engineering, 2022050100200Feet(02/11/2022 JVR) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_SheetIndex_GradingPlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_SheetIndex_GradingPlan_20220211.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Sheet Index Plan from Grading Plan Exhibit 9aFFRIVERSIDE FREEWAY 91 Source: Anacal Engineering, 2022(02/11/2022 JVR) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_SectionDetails_GradingPlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_SectionDetails_GradingPlan_20220211.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Section Details and Notes from Grading Plan Exhibit 9bSANTA ANA CANYON ROADCITY TYPICAL SECTION 170 FROM 3300' E/O WIER CANYON ROAD TO 1600' W/O GYPSUM CANYON ROADSECTION 'A'EASEMENT NOTESSECTION 'B-B'SECTION 'D-D'SECTION 'E-E'SECTION 'F-F'SECTION 'C-C'SECTION 'H-H'SECTION 'I-I'MANHOLE DETAILSECTION G-G Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_UpperPlaza_Ph2.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_UpperPlaza_Ph2_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 2 Exhibit 10RENOVATED AUDITORIUM(N) ADDITION25' H(N) ADDITION25' H(N) ADDITION25' H:&*1*PROPOSED AUDITORIUM RENOVATION & ADDITIONNEW MODULAR BUILDING DNEW MODULAR BUILDING ANEW ASPHALT PAVING & STRIPING AT EXISTING TURF LOT10' H, 1440 SF10' H, 1440 SFPARKING LOT 3105 STALLS31,835 SF(13) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.110' - 6"(12) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.102' - 0"(10) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.85' - 0"(9) STALLS @ 8'6" EA.76' - 6"24' - 0"24' - 0"4 2 ' - 0 "60' - 0"60' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"1 8 ' - 0 "2 4 ' - 0 "NEW MODULAR BUILDING C10' H, 1440 SFNEW MODULAR BUILDING B10' H, 1440 SFNEW STRIPING AT EXISTING LOTEXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 3EXISTING RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING(FELLOWSHIP HALL)EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 2EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 1(13) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.(12) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.102' - 0"(20) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.170' - 0"(16) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.NEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFO?'?'6+ &):;HO>@K:=>?'?'6) &):;HO>@K:=>8' - 0"?'?'6+ &):;HO>@K:=>NEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFO10' - 0"24' - 0"60' - 0"24' - 0"10' - 0"60' - 0"13' - 10"10' - 0"24' - 0"9' - 0"24' - 0"60' - 0"6' - 6"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"3' - 8"5' - 0"2' - 0"6' - 6"2' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"M. Steven CampENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA - PHASE 21" = 30'-0"NOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTSNORTHTOTAL ADDED BUILT AREAMODULARS-MODULAR A1,440 SF-MODULAR B1,440 SF-MODULAR C1,440 SF-MODULAR D1,440 SF TOTAL5,760 SFAAUUDDIITTOORRIIUUMM RREENNOOVVAATTIIOONN && AADDDDIITTIIOONN-DEMOLISHED AREA -911 SF-ADDITION AREA3,704 SF TTOOTTAALL ((NNEETT))22,,779933 SSFFPHASE 2DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK• ADDITION OF (4) MODULAR BUILDINGS• INTERIOR RENOVATION OF EXISTING AUDITORIUM, PLUS (3) NEW WING ADDITIONS• FULLY PAVE & STRIPE PARKING LOT #3 (PREVIOUSLY ON TURF IN PHASE 1)• RE-STRIPE EXISTING PARKING LOTS #4 & #5TOTAL ADDED AREA8,553 SF Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_Lower_Ph2.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Proposed_SitePlan_Lower_Ph2_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Proposed Site Plan for Lower Portion of Site with Implementation of Phase 2 Exhibit 11AAAAAAAAE E WA Y 9 1CANYON R O AD BBBA 2A A 2BAPARKING LOT 4EXISTING STALLS TO BE RE-STRIPED WITH NEW STRIPING PER CITY STANDARD, TYP.141 STALLS48,531 SF24' - 0"(16) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.@ 8'-6" EA.(5) STALLSEXISTING MONUMENT SIGN TO BE REPLACED, AND RE-LOCATED OUT OF CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. .NOTE: SIGNAGE MODIFICATION WILL BE SUBMTITED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLYFUTURE CITY OF ANAHEIM RIGHT-OF-WAYSANTA ANA CANYON ROAD91 FREEWAYEXISTING PARKING LOT PAVING TO REMAIN24' - 0"NEW LANDSCAPING -SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MORE INFO18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"APN 354-321-03APN 354-321-03(5 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " EA .18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 4"18' - 0"(15) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.127' - 6"(14) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.119' - 0"(13) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.110' - 6"(5) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.42' - 6"EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLAND, TYP.(15) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.127' - 6"(3 ) S T A L L S A T 8 '-6 " E A .(20) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.170' - 0"(12) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.16' - 5"4' - 5"(17 STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.)144' - 6"EXISTING GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING LOT TO REMAINEXISTING PAVED OVERFLOW PARKING LOT TO REMAIN50' - 0"7' - 0"FUTURE CURB & GUTTER PER CIVIL PLANSSIGHT DISTANCE AREA -TO BE CLEAR OF ANY OBSTRUCTION ABOVE 24" IN HEIGHTM. Steven CampENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT LOWER PARKING LOTS - PHASN1" = Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-3 Project Description requirements; new and modified restrooms; and new tactile signage. Additional modular structures are depicted in Exhibit 10, Proposed Site Plan for Upper Plaza with Implementation of Phase 2. Remodel of Existing Auditorium The Project would remodel the existing auditorium building to include two new wings totaling 2,146 square feet for additional seating, as well as a back-of-house area behind the stage as depicted in Exhibit 12, Auditorium Renovation Plan. The auditorium additions would consist of metal building additions with clerestory windows, metal panel roofing, and parapet walls up to 25 feet high to screen rooftop equipment. The back-of-house addition of 2,099 square feet would consist of a hallway, prayer room, green room, restroom, information technology room, and a storage room with a roll-up access door. Remodeling of the auditorium would also include the addition of an entry foyer with new entry doors, removal of internal partition walls, relocation of exterior doors, modifications to exterior walls and a storefront, relocation of an audiovisual control booth, and replacement of the auditorium’s platform. The back-of-house addition would include an exterior wall-mounted trellis with vines. The exterior materials would include corrugated metal panels in galvanized finish, fluted metal panels in grey finish, and new clerestory windows with dark bronze anodized framing and tinted glazing. The Project would repaint the exterior of the existing auditorium building in white and grey-blue tones. Elevations depicting the Auditorium exterior are provided as Exhibit 13. Exterior materials and finishes proposed for the Auditorium are shown in Exhibit 14. Phase 2 Parking Area Improvements During Phase 2, the Project would fully pave, stripe, and landscape Parking Lot Number 3, which the Project would construct during Phase 1. The Project would also re-stripe and install curbed planters in Parking Lot Number 4 during this phase. Internal circulation and parking improvements are depicted in Exhibit 15. Circulation Improvements Internal roadways, curbs, and gutters within the Project site would be realigned to account for the revised design of the church campus. The Project would modify the existing one-way loop road within the Project site to allow for incoming and outgoing traffic on the eastern internal roadway, while maintaining traffic movement along the western internal roadway similar to the existing conditions. Entry Monument Signage, Hardscape and Landscaping Enhancements to the Project site’s entrance along East Santa Ana Canyon Road would include removal of the existing monument sign and curbed island that are located within the City right-of- way. These enhancements would replace the existing monument sign with a new monument sign2, located outside of the City right-of-way. The enhancements would also include the installation of landscaping around the entry monument sign. The landscaping near the entry monument would include new tree species such as Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) Engelmann oak (Quercus englemanii). California Black Walnut (Juglans californica), and Western Sycamore (Platanus racemose), as well as drought-adapted shrub and grass species. Additional trees and other landscaping is proposed across the Project site including within the site’s Upper Plaza and parking lots. Overall, the Project would plant approximately 88 new trees 2 All signage modifications would be submitted under a separate permit. Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_RenovationPlan_Auditorium.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_RenovationPlan_Auditorium_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Auditorium Renovation Plan Exhibit 12(E)AUDITORIUM016374 SFWING A121047 SFWING B131049 SFSTORAGE14662 SFSPEAKER'SGREENROOM19185 SFTECHPRODUCTIONSUITE15175 SFRESTROOM1863 SFI.T.ROOM1751 SFB.O.H.1135 SFHALLWAY20208 SFFOYER02701 SFMOM'SROOM0366 SF(E)KITCHEN07549 SF(E)ELECT.09100 SF(E)STORAGE0888 SFWOMEN05353 SFMEN04192 SF(E) RISER0617 SFNEW PLATFORM NEW WALLS WITH ENTRY DOORS AT FOYER SPACENEW CANOPY POSTS -SEE ELEVATIONNEW ROOF ACCESS LADDERNEW WALL-MOUNTED TRELLIS WITH VINES -SEE ELEVATION82' - 6":&+)*:&+),:&+)+:&+)-2' - 0"NEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR EXTRA SEATINGNEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR EXTRA SEATINGNEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR CHURCH BACK-OF-HOUSE FUNCTIONSAUDIO-VISUAL BOOTHEXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 36" H HEDGES -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 36" H HEDGES -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 42" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.EXISTING ROOF ACCESS LADDERPLATFORM10929 SFEXISTING RENOVATED RESTROOMSMUSICIAN'SGREENROOM16189 SF25' - 0"NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP TO REPLACE EXISTING2' - 0"2' - 0"11' - 1"39' - 4"11' - 1"39' - 4"25' - 0"M. Steven CampAUDITORIUM RENOVATION PLAN1/8" = 1'-0NORTHTOTAL EXISTING AREA:TOTAL DEMOLISHED AREA: TOTAL PROPOSED ADDITION:NAMEAREA(E) AUDITORIUM6,374 SFHALLWAY208 SFTECH PRODUCTION SUITE 175 SFSPEAKER'S GREEN ROOM 185 SFRESTROOM63 SFI.T. ROOM51 SFSTORAGE662 SFFOYER701 SF(E) KITCHEN549 SFMOM'S ROOM66 SFMEN192 SFWOMEN353 SF(E) RISER17 SFWING A1,047 SFWING B1,049 SF(E) STORAGE88 SF(E) ELECT.100 SFB.O.H.35 SFPLATFORM929 SFMUSICIAN'S GREEN ROOM 189 SF13,035 SF 10,456 -911 +3,70413,249 SFTOTAL:TOTAL AREA:AREA TABULATIONSROOM SCHEDULECODE ANALYSISCONSTRUCTION TYPE:VB, SPRINKLEREDOCCUPANCY TYPE: A-3ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:60'ALLOWABLE AREA:24,000 SFGENERAL NOTES1. THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE EXTENDED THROUGHOUT THE AUDITORIUM ADDITION AREAS AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND NFPA 13.2. A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT ALL AREAS OF THE AUDITORIUM AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3. BECAUSE OCCUPANT LOAD EXCEEDS 1,000 IN THIS BUILDING, FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF EMERGENCY VOICE EVACUATION FUNCTIONALITY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND NFPA 72.4. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN VHFSZ. AUDITORIUM BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL THEREFORE COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC CHAPTER 7A AND 2019 CFC CHAPTER 49 620 TOTAL SEATSTOTAL EXISTING SEATS:440 TOTAL ADDED SEATS:180TOTAL # OF SEATS:62013,249 SF Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Elevations_Auditorium.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Elevations_Auditorium_20220105.aiNEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHWALL-MOUNTED STAINLESS STEEL TRELLIS FOR VINE GROWTHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZE22' - 0" (EXISTING)3' - 0"25' - 0"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGEXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZE25' - 0"NEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING ROOF LADDER3' - 0"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 60" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZENEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZING25' - 0"22' - 0"15' - 0"EXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS WITH SIDELIGHT AND TRANSOM, WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHNEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGNEW WALL-MOUNTED CANOPY WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW WALL SCONCE, TYP.NEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.10' - 0"3' - 0"EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 60" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.12' - 0"25' - 0"EXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME, PAINTED TO MATCH WALL FINISHNEW WALL-MOUNTED CANOPY WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISH8' - 6"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.NEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZING16' - 6"12' - 0"NEW ROLL-UP DOOR WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISH2' - 0"25' - 0"M. Steven CampAUDITORIUM ELEVATION1GHKMA>E>O:MBHG2>:LM>E>O:MBHG3LHNMA>E>O:MBHG4P>LM>E>O:MBHGGENERAL NOTES1.ALL EXISTING AND NEW BUILDING HEIGHTS COMPLY WITHMAXIMUM HEIGHT PER CODE, WHICH IS 35' PER 18.18.090.2.ANY WALL-MOUNTED SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER ASEPARATE PERMITKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Auditorium Elevations Exhibit 13 Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Materials_Auditorium.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Materials_Auditorium_20220105.aiAABCDEFABBCDDDEEFFM. Steven CampREAR ADDITION WALL-MOUNTED SYSTEM: STAINLESS STEEL CABLE BY "JAKOB ROPE"PAINT COLOR AT BUILDING "WINGS""WING" ADDITION EXTERIOR CLADDING, TYP: MBCI "AVP" FLUTED METAL PANEL IN "SLATE GRAY"VINE TRELLISFLUTED METAL PANELCORRUGATED METAL PANELREAR ADDITION EXTERIOR CLADDING & ENTRY CANOPY, TYP: MBCI "PBC" HORIZONTAL CORRUGATED METAL PANEL IN "GALVALUME"(PANEL TEXTURE)(PANEL COLOR)(PANEL TEXTURE)(PANEL COLOR)STOREFRONTDARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING WITH TINTED LOW-E INSULATED GLAZING-TINT TO MATCH EXISTINGVIEW FROM NORTHWEST CORNERVIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNERPAINT COLOR AT MAIN BUILDING "SHELL"EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURESAT WING ADDITIONS: OCL "VEGA"; DARK BRONZE FINISHAT MAIN ENTRY POINTS: SONNEMAN "FOLD"; DARK BRONZE FINISHKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Auditorium Materials and FinishesExhibit 14 Source: Elements Architecture, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Circulation_Parking.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Circulation_Parking_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Internal Circulation and Parking Improvements Exhibit 15PARKING LOT 1PARKING LOT 2PARKING LOT 3PARKING LOT 4PARKING LOT 5(EXISTING PAVED PARKING TO BE RE-STRIPED)(EXISTING PAVED PARKING LOT TO BE RE-STRIPED & LANDSCAPED)(PROPOSED; PERMEABLE IN PHASE 1; FULLY PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 2)(MODIFIED, PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 1)(MODIFIED, PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 1)C A VC AVC A VC A VC A VC A V C A V C A V C A V CAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVE V E V E V E V E V E V EVEVEVEVEVEVPARKING LOT 6(EXISTING TO REMAIN)PARKING LOT 7(EXISTING TO REMAIN)C A VCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAV CAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVC A V EVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVC A V EV<BK<NE:MBHGE>@>G=EXISTING VEHICLE CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELEXISTING PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELPROPOSED VEHICLE CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELPROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVEL0' - 4"18' - 0"1' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"DOUBLE-STRIPING PER CITY OF ANAHEIM ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 470, TYP.(ADJACENT LANDSCAPING, CURB OR CONC. WALK)24' -0" TYP. DRIVE AISLE U.N.O.2' - 0"M. Steven CampDESCRIPTION:QTY:LOT 177LOT 265LOT 3105LOT 4141LOT 543TOTAL PARKING431ACCESSIBLE STALL 6STANDARD STALL 71TOTAL 77ACCESSIBLE STALL 6STANDARD STALL 59TOTAL 65STANDARD STALL 105STANDARD STALL 141ACCESSIBLE STALL 2STANDARD STALL 4143ACCESSIBLE STALL14(MIN. 2% OF TOTAL PARKING)ACCESSIBLE VAN STALL4(1 FOR EVERY 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)IKHIHL>=I:KDBG@>QBLMBG@I:KDBG@DESCRIPTION:QTY:LOT 1141LOT 254LOT 4129LOT 583TOTAL PARKING407MRIB<:EI:KDBG@LM:EELMKBIBG@CLEAN AIR VEHICLE STALL 52*(MIN. 12% OF TOTAL PARKING)MIN. 2 ACCESSIBLE -*1 ACCESS.; 1 VAN ACCESS.TOTAL43 376130141EVCS VEHICLE STALL 44*(MIN. 10% OF TOTAL PARKING)MIN. 2 ACCESSIBLE -*1 ACCESS.; 1 VAN ACCESS.EVCS REQUIRED PER CBC TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1: (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE(1) ACCESSIBLE(1) AMBULATORY* SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONSOVERFLOW STALL 64OVERFLOW STALL 79OVERFLOW (LOTS 6&7) 143TOTAL PARKING WITH OVERFLOW 575OVERFLOW (LOTS 6&7) 143TOTAL PARKING WITH OVERFLOW 51943262 (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE EVCS(1) ACCESSIBLE EVCS(1) AMBULATORY EVCS Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-4 Project Description across the Project site during phases 1 and 2. Also, new concrete paving, decomposed granite, and permeable unit pavers would be installed as part of the creation of an Upper Plaza portion of the Project site. Landscaping and hardscape improvements are depicted in Exhibits 16a, 16b, and 16c. Stormwater In the existing condition, the majority of the Project site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing City storm drain that traverses the Project site, which was constructed to serve the adjacent residential development to the south. The Project would redirect stormwater flows from throughout the Project site to a new 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). The RCP would collect and convey flows downslope to an underground infiltration system, which would consist of two underground stormwater infiltration chambers within a portion of APN 354-321-03. In the event of stormwater exceeding the design capture volume for the underground infiltration chamber, excess water would be rerouted to the existing City storm drain through an 18-inch RCP overflow pipe. Prior to flowing into the 18-inch RCP, at least 50 percent of stormwater would be pre-treated for sediment, debris, and hydrocarbons using Filterra stormwater biofiltration units. Catch basins would be installed with FloGard filters to capture trash and debris. These improvements are depicted in Exhibit 17, Water Quality Best Management Practices and described in more detail in the Project’s Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) (Anacal Engineering 2021). Utility Relocations To accommodate the revised church campus layout, the Project includes a variety of utility relocations within the Project site, including the relocation of a water vault box, relocation of potable water main line, relocation of an existing fire hydrant, installation of a new fire hydrant, and relocation of an existing fire water vault box with backflow prevention device. Grading The Project would require grading work, which would result in approximately 300 cubic yards of cut and 2,900 cubic yards of fill. The Project would require the import of 2,600 cubic yards of fill from off-site. Proposed fill activities would primarily be required to fill the existing artificial lake on the Project site for the development of Parking Lot Number 3 at the same location. Grading would largely maintain existing grades with maximum depth of cuts of approximately one foot in depth and maximum depth of fill up to three feet in depth. Project grading is depicted in Exhibits 9a, Sheet Index Plan from Grading Plan and 9b, Section Details and Notes from Grading Plan. Construction Details The Applicant anticipates that construction of the Project would last approximately ten months and would begin in 2022 and end in 2023, as outlined in Table 1, below. Source: Lane Goodkind + Associates, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan_A_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 16aMUH REVMUH RIGNOL PARSPO AIRRIB INDRHA LEARIB INDRHA LEAART DOUART DOUBOT BARLEY CONBOT BAR24-SPO AIRART DOURAF65-SPO AIRSPO AIRMUH RIGART DOUSFILLES FILBOT BARBER NEVLEY CONSAL WINRIB INDRIB INDPER ARBLEY CONPER ARBLEY CONBER NEVLEY CONSAL WINART DOUMUH REVMUH RIGNOL PARSPO AIRLEY CONBAC PILPER ARBENC FARMUH REVMUH RIGNOL PARSPO AIRMUH REVMUH RIGNOL PARSPO AIRMUH RIGSPO AIRPER ARBENC FARBER NEVBAC PILLEY CONSAL WINRhu intBOT BARLEY CONRIB INDRHA LEAQUE AGRJUG CALJUG CALJUG CAL02040 FTEXISTING WATERLINE EASEMENTPER M.M.748/23-27EXISTINGEASEMENT TOBALDWINBUILDERSFORSTORMDRAINPURPOSESINST.19970643589 REC 12/16/1997Plant ListIDQtyCategoryLatin NameCommon NameSpacingSizeWater UseART DOU144PerennialsArtemisia douglasianaDouglas Mugwort3'0"1gallowBAC PIL10GroundcoverBaccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'Dwarf Coyote Bush6'0"1galLowBER NEV9ShrubBerberis 'Nevinii'Nevin Barberry8'0"5gallowBOT BAR247GrassesBothriocloa barbinodisBluestem Grass3'0"1gallowLES FIL100GroundcoverCorethrogyne 'Smart Aster'Carmel Aster3'0"1gallowENC FAR195PerennialEncelia farinosaBrittle Brush2'6"1gallowLEY CON496grassLeymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'Canyon Prince Wildrye2'0"1gallowMUH REV302grassMuhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’Undaunted Ruby Muhly2'6"1gallowMUH RIG154grassMuhlenbergia rigensDeer Grass3'0"1gallowNOL PAR29cacti-succulentsNolina nelsoniiParry's Nolina5'0"5gallowPER ARB186CategoryPeritoma arboreaBladderpod4'0"1GALlowRHA LEA13ShrubRhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'California Coffee Berry5'0"5GALlowRhu int1ShrubsRhus integrifoliaLemonadeberry10'0"5galLowRIB IND78ShrubsRibes indecorumWhite Flowering Currant5'0"5gallowSAL WIN27ShrubsSalvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'Winifred Gillman Sage4'0"1gallowSPH AMB42CategorySphaeralcea ambiguaDesert Mallow5'2 1/4"1gallowSPO AIR501grassSporobolus airoidesSacaton2'6"1gallowLOW-LYING AREAS AND BIO-PLANTERSART DOU - Artemisia douglasianaBOT BAR - Bothriocloa barbinodisCAR SPI - Carex spissaJUN PAT - Juncus patens 'Elk Blue'LEY CON - Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'SOL CAL - Solidago californicaDRY GRASSLANDS & BIO-PLANTER EDGESMUH REV - Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’SPO AIR - Sporobolus airoidesENC FAR - Encelia farinosaMUH RIG - Muhlenbergia rigensLES FIL - Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster'EPI CAT - Epilobium 'Catalina'UPLAND SAGE-SCRUB/CHAPARRALARC HOW - Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn'BAC PIL - Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'SAL WIN - Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'RIB IND - Ribes indecorumRHA LEA - Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'CEA OLI - Ceanothus oliganthusBER NEV - Berberis 'Nevinii'QUE AGR - Quercus agrifoliaQUE ENG - Quercus englemaniihet arb - Heteromeles arbutifoliaJUG CAL - Juglans californicaPLA RAC - Platanus racemosaCONCRETE PAVINGEXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TOREMAINDECOMPONSED GRANITEPERMEABLE UNIT PAVERS Source: Lane Goodkind + Associates, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan_B_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 16bN.58°19'18"E.650.22'QUE AGR02040 FTPlant ListIDQtyCategoryLatin NameCommon NameSpacingSizeWater UseART DOU144PerennialsArtemisia douglasianaDouglas Mugwort3'0"1 gallowBAC PIL10GroundcoverBaccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'Dwarf Coyote Bush6'0"1 galLowBER NEV9ShrubBerberis 'Nevinii'Nevin Barberry8'0"5 gallowBOT BAR247GrassesBothriocloa barbinodisBluestem Grass3'0"1 gallowLES FIL100GroundcoverCorethrogyne 'Smart Aster'Carmel Aster3'0"1 gallowENC FAR195PerennialEncelia farinosaBrittle Brush2'6"1 gallowLEY CON496grassLeymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'Canyon Prince Wildrye2'0"1 gallowMUH REV302grassMuhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’Undaunted Ruby Muhly2'6"1 gallowMUH RIG154grassMuhlenbergia rigensDeer Grass3'0"1 gallowNOL PAR29cacti-succulentsNolina nelsoniiParry's Nolina5'0"5 gallowPER ARB186CategoryPeritoma arboreaBladderpod4'0"1 GALlowRHA LEA13ShrubRhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'California Coffee Berry5'0"5 GALlowRhu int1ShrubsRhus integrifoliaLemonadeberry10'0"5 galLowRIB IND78ShrubsRibes indecorumWhite Flowering Currant5'0"5 gallowSAL WIN27ShrubsSalvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'Winifred Gillman Sage4'0"1 gallowSPH AMB42CategorySphaeralcea ambiguaDesert Mallow5'2 1/4"1 gallowSPO AIR501grassSporobolus airoidesSacaton2'6"1 gallowLOW-LYING AREAS AND BIO-PLANTERSART DOU - Artemisia douglasianaBOT BAR - Bothriocloa barbinodisCAR SPI - Carex spissaJUNPAT-Juncuspatens'ElkBlue'LEY CON - Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'SOL CAL - Solidago californicaDRY GRASSLANDS & BIO-PLANTER EDGESMUH REV - Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’SPO AIR - Sporobolus airoidesENC FAR - Encelia farinosaMUH RIG - Muhlenbergia rigensLES FIL - Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster'EPI CAT - Epilobium 'Catalina'UPLAND SAGE-SCRUB/CHAPARRALARC HOW - Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn'BAC PIL - Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'SAL WIN - Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'RIB IND - Ribes indecorumRHA LEA - Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'CEA OLI - Ceanothus oliganthusBER NEV - Berberis 'Nevinii'QUE AGR - Quercus agrifoliaQUE ENG - Quercus englemaniihet arb - Heteromeles arbutifoliaJUG CAL - Juglans californicaPLA RAC - Platanus racemosaCONCRETE PAVINGEXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TOREMAINDECOMPONSED GRANITEPERMEABLE UNIT PAVERS Source: Lane Goodkind + Associates, 2021(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_Concept_LandscapePlan_C_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 16c Source: Anacal Engineering, 2021080160 320Feet(01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_WaterQuality_BMP.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\ISMND\ex_WaterQuality_BMP_20220105.aiKindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim)Water Quality Best Management PracticesExhibit 17CATCH BASIN DETAIL Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-5 Project Description TABLE 1 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Phase Project Activity Duration or Timing Construction Begins Summer 2022 Phase 1 Relocation of Modular Structures and Fabric Tent, Demolition of Portions of the Auditorium 10 weeks Establishment of Upper Plateau Campus, Installation of Retaining Wall, and Development of Temporary Permeable Parking Lot 6 weeks Phase 2 Install Additional Modular Structures, Remodel Auditorium 20 weeks Paving, Striping, and Landscaping of Parking Lots 2 weeks Architectural Coatings to New Structures 2 weeks Project Completed Spring 2023 Source: Elements Architecture 2021. 3.1.3 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS The following discretionary actions would be required: Amendment to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Community and Religious Facility (Kindred Church) (CUP 4033E). Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 3-6 Project Description This page intentionally left blank Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-1 Environmental Checklist SECTION 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CITY OF ANAHEIM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM Form Revision Date: 1/16/2019 PROJECT AND CASE NUMBERS: DEV2020-00016, CEQA2021-00009, CUP4033E SITE ADDRESS: 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California 92808 PROJECT NAME: Kindred Church Expansion Project LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS: City of Anaheim, 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162, Anaheim, California 92805 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER: Mr. Andy T. Uk, Associate Planner City of Anaheim Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Phone: 714-765-5238 Email: auk@anaheim.net PROJECT LOCATION: Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-2 Environmental Checklist PROJECT SPONSOR’S NAME AND ADDRESS: Kindred Community Church 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim, California 92808 Contact: Doug McAllister Email: dmcallister@kindredchurch.org GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Open Space (OS) ZONING: Zoning Classification Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) Zone for APN 354-321-01; and The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) Zone for APN 514-091-25 and 514-101- 28. Overlay Zones Planned Community (PC) Overlay Zone Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of two phases to expand the existing Kindred Community Church. The Project’s proposed total additional square footage is 9,839 square feet with an increase of 180 seats in seating capacity within the auditorium. PROJECT SETTING AND SURROUNDING LAND USES: The Project site encompasses approximately 14.79 acres and is located at 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim in Orange County. Kindred Community Church is currently located on the Project site. The existing church facilities include a 29,503-square foot worship center, a day care center, a fellowship hall, a multi-purpose building, modular buildings, four parking lots containing a total of 376 parking spaces3, a welcome tent, an amphitheater/outdoor chapel, an artificial lake, a mechanical building, a modular residence with garage, a garage/maintenance building, and outdoor lighting. The General Plan designates the properties located adjacent to the Project site for Open Space land use. Existing land uses adjacent to the site include East Santa Ana Canyon Road and State Route (SR) 91 to the north; a vacant and previously developed parcel to the northeast; two open space parcels with stormwater brow ditches upslope of the Project site to the south; undeveloped land to the east; and undeveloped land to the west. OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED: Not Applicable 3 An additional 143 parking spaces are located off-site to the northeast within APN 354-321-03, for a total of 519 parking spaces. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-3 Environmental Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agricultural & Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required. ____________________________________ _________________ Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date ____________________________________ _________________ Printed Name/Title Phone No. March 22, 2022 Andy Uk, Associate Planner 714-765-5238 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-4 Environmental Checklist EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section. 3) Response Column Heading Definitions: a) Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. c) Less Than Significant Impact applies where the project creates no significant impacts, only Less Than Significant impacts. d) No Impact applies where a project does not create an impact in that category. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed (e.g., the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15062(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., the General Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 6) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-5 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES -- In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? III. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-6 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (April 15, 2010)? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? VI. ENERGY -- Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-7 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Section 1803.5.3 of the California Building Code (2010), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-8 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-9 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XII. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XIII. NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XV. PUBLIC SERVICES -- Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XVI. RECREATION -- a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-10 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XVII. TRANSPORTATION -- Would the project: a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b)Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section §21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section §5020.1(k), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5024.1. In applying criterial set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section §5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form)? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-11 Environmental Checklist Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact f) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? g) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? h) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? i) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? XX. WILDFIRE -- If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 4-12 Environmental Checklist Fish and Wildlife Determination Per Section 21089(b) of the Public Resources Code, all project applicants and public agencies subject to CEQA shall pay a Fish and Wildlife filing fee for each Project that would adversely affect wildlife resources.* Based on the responses contained in this Environmental Checklist, there is no evidence that the project has a potential for a change that would adversely affect wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Has the presumption of adverse effect set forth in 14 CCR 753.5(d) been rebutted by substantial evidence? ___ Yes (Certificate of Fee Exemption and County Administrative fee required) _X_ No (Pay fee) *Note: California Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)(2)(A) states that projects that are Categorically Exempt from CEQA are also exempt from filing fee. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-1 Environmental Evaluation SECTION 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. AESTHETICS Question A: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The Project is located on a site that has been previously developed with a community church. The church is developed on graded pads that were integrated into a hillside as a series of terraces, which trend downslope to the north towards East Santa Ana Canyon Road. Areas to the north of the Project site include East Santa Ana Canyon Road and State Route (SR) 91. The existing uses to the south, east, and west of the Project site are undeveloped. According to the Green Element of the City’s General Plan (Anaheim 2020a) the contours of the Hill and Canyon Area of the City, as well as the Santa Ana Mountains are visible scenic vistas. Other scenic amenities such as golf courses and the Santa Ana River also provide visual relief and are important visual amenities and landmarks. The Project site is located in the Hill and Canyon Area of the City, however the Project would not impede any public views of the Santa Ana Mountains, Santa Ana River, golf courses, or other visual resources. The Project would occur on a previously graded site and does not require major grading. Also, the Project does not include construction or modification of structures at or near the top of any ridgelines or hilltops that could affect views of these vistas. Therefore, the Project would have no impact on a scenic vista, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Anaheim General Plan, a 4.5-mile segment of SR-91 is an officially designated State Scenic Highway from SR-55 to west of the Weir Canyon Road interchange, approximately 2.25 miles to the west of the Project site. This designation is enforced through the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone contained in the Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.18. SR- 91 runs along the banks of the Santa Ana River. Views include mountain ridgelines, canyons, rolling hills, intermittent riparian and chaparral vegetation, and residential and commercial development. Also, the stretch of SR-91 east of Weir Canyon, near the Project site, is an eligible State Scenic Highway, but it is not officially designated as a Scenic Highway (Anaheim 2020a, Caltrans 2021). The Project site is located within the City’s SC Overlay Zone, which is defined as the area of the City located east of the intersection of the SR-55 and SR-91 Freeways; west of the Orange County line; south of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way; and north of the present or any future south city limits of the City of Anaheim (Anaheim 2021a). The SC Overlay Zone was established to provide for and promote orderly growth in an area of the City considered to have distinctive, scenic importance. Section 18.18.040 of the City’s Municipal Code contains policies and procedures for tree preservation within the SC Overlay Zone, as well as policies pertaining to the removal of trees in this zone. The Project requires the removal of 29 trees within the Project site; however, no rock outcroppings, or historic buildings, or other significant scenic resources would be removed as part of the Project. Given the Project consists of the redevelopment of an existing campus, the Project would retain much of the existing vegetation on the Project site, which would avoid potential visual impacts to views from areas within the scenic corridor. Trees removed would be replaced with Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-2 Environmental Evaluation other vegetation throughout the Project site as shown in the Project’s landscaping plan provided as Exhibits 16a, 16b, and 16c, which would include species such as Coast Live Oak, Engelmann oak, California Black Walnut, and Western Sycamore, which would minimize visual impacts. The net number of trees and landscaped area would increase with the Project when compared to existing conditions, including enhanced landscaping at the Project site entrance, which would improve views from SR-91 and East Santa Ana Canyon Road. Overall, 29 trees would be removed and 88 new trees would be planted within the Project site. Given that the current property owner (e.g., the Project Applicant) originally planted all trees within the Project site that would be removed, the removal of these trees is exempt from the requirements for a Specimen Tree Removal Permit, pursuant to the conditions contained in Section 18.18.040 of the City’s Municipal Code. As described above, the Project would require vegetation removal within the City’s SC Overlay Zone on a Project site that is visible from an eligible state scenic highway. As discussed in more detail above, views of the Project site would be minimally affected by the tree removal and other improvements proposed as part of the Project. Furthermore, the Project would be developed consistent with the Municipal Code policies related to the SC Overlay Zone and underlying SP88- 1 and SP88-2 zoning classifications for the Project site. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result from the Project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question C: In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an urbanized area, as defined by Section 21071 of the CEQA Statute; therefore, the analysis for this threshold focuses on whether the Project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. The majority of the property is located within the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) Zone; however, a small portion (approximately two acres) is located within The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) Zone. The Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) identifies the Project site as a future church with an underlying Open Space land use; however, SP88-1 does not include any detailed standards or procedures for the development of the church. SP88-1 includes a brief discussion that an 11- acre church is planned in the northeast portion of the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan area. SP88- 1 notes that the details of the proposed church would be addressed in a subsequent application (Anaheim 1988a). SP88-1 states that the standards of the Open Space Zone in Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special Purpose Zones) of the City’s Municipal Code shall apply for the areas shown as open space on the Sycamore Canyon Development Plan Map, such as the Project site. Pursuant to Chapter 18.14 of the City’s Municipal Code, the existing church and proposed expansion of the church under the Project would be conditionally permitted uses. In addition to the City-wide sign requirements codified in Chapter 18.44 of the City’s Municipal Code, SP88-1 also includes requirements for signage in the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan in Section 18.102.150 of the Municipal Code. These requirements have been incorporated into the relocated monument signage, which will be reviewed and approved by the City as part of a future and separate discretionary action. The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) similarly identifies the Project site as a future church with an underlying Open Space land use in mapping but does not include any detailed Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-3 Environmental Evaluation standards or procedures for the development of the church (Anaheim 1988b). As outlined in the Open Space Standards for the Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan, which are codified in Section 18.104.080 of the City’s Municipal Code, the existing church and proposed expansion of the church under the Project are conditionally permitted uses. SP88-2 includes additional requirements for signage; however, none of the Project signage would occur within any parcels zoned as SP88-2, so these policies are not applicable. The City originally approved a CUP for the church in 1988 as a semi-enclosed “garden church” by CUP 3032. In 1998, the City subsequently approved the existing church by CUP 4033. This CUP permitted a 29,503-square foot church with accessory day care center, fellowship hall, and multi-purpose building in conjunction with existing modular buildings. The City subsequently amended the CUP in 1998 to add a parsonage home; in 2004 to allow 5,611 addition to the fellowship hall; and, in 2008 to add three modular units for Sunday school classrooms. As described above under threshold I(B), the entire property is within the SC Overlay Zone, and the Project has been designed to be consistent with the requirements for this zone. As part of the City’s design review process and amendment to the CUP for the Project site, the Project has been reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with applicable regulations related to scenic quality, including maximum building heights, signage, and tree removal. Given that the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from existing church uses on the Project site; street lights along East Santa Ana Canyon; Road; lighting from passing vehicles along East Santa Ana Canyon Road and SR-91; and lighting from residential uses located south of the Project site. New lighting would be added to the exterior of the auditorium, including wall sconces along walls and at the building entrances. Also, pole-mounted lighting would be provided near parking lots and bollard lighting would be provided along pedestrian paths within the Project site. The circular screen and tree seating area within the upper campus would be lit with new accent lighting and the relocated fabric tent would be retrofitted to include micro-profile light fixtures. These additional sources of light would occur within a Project site that is already subject to nighttime lighting, and this lighting would be downcast and would not leave the property. Installation of lighting for the Project would not be a substantial increase in lighting in the area and would not adversely affect nighttime views. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-4 Environmental Evaluation II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST LAND RESOURCES Question A: Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Question B: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Question C: Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined in Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Question D: Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Question E: Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. According to mapping prepared by the California Department of Conservation (DOC 2021a), the Project site is designated as “Urban and Built Up Land”, and does not contain any land designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Local Importance. Also, it is not zoned for agricultural use and there are no Williamson Act contracts applicable to the Project site (Anaheim 2020a). The Project site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as “land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits”, nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. No impacts related to agricultural and forest land resources would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-5 Environmental Evaluation III. AIR QUALITY Air Quality Background Information and Regulatory Conditions The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) defines seven “criteria” air pollutants, as described below. These pollutants are called criteria pollutants because the USEPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the concentrations of these pollutants (USEPA 2021a). The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has also established standards for the criteria pollutants, known as California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), and the State standards are generally more restrictive than the NAAQS. Ozone (O3) is a nearly colorless gas that is formed by photochemical reaction of nitrogen dioxide and volatile organic compounds with sunlight. Ground-level O3 exposure can cause a variety of health problems, including lung irritation, wheezing, coughing, pain when taking a deep breath, and breathing difficulties during exercise or outdoor activities; permanent lung damage; aggravated asthma; and increased susceptibility to respiratory illnesses. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless and odorless toxic gas which, in the urban environment, is associated primarily with the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels in motor vehicles. CO combines with hemoglobin in the bloodstream and reduces the amount of oxygen that can be circulated through the body. High CO concentrations can lead to headaches, aggravation of cardiovascular disease, and impairment of central nervous system functions. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are yellowish-brown gases, which at high levels can cause breathing difficulties. NOx are formed when nitric oxide (a pollutant from internal combustion processes) combines with oxygen. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur-containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and difficulty in breathing for children. Respirable Particulate Matter 10 (PM10) and Fine Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5) refer to particulate matter equal to or less than ten microns and two and one-half microns in diameter, respectively. Particulates of this size cause a greater health risk than larger- sized particles since fine particles can more easily cause irritation. Particulate matter includes both aerosols and solid particles. An example of particulate matter is fugitive dust. Short-term exposure to high PM2.5 levels is associated with premature mortality and increased hospital admissions and emergency room visits. Long-term exposure to high PM2.5 levels is associated with premature mortality and development of chronic respiratory disease. Short-term exposure to high PM10 levels is associated with hospital admissions for cardiopulmonary diseases, increased respiratory symptoms, and possible premature mortality. Lead is a metal found naturally in the environment and in manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been mobile and industrial sources. Lead is a stable compound that persists and accumulates both in the environment and in animals. In humans, it affects the body’s blood-forming, nervous, and renal systems. In addition, lead has been shown to affect the normal functions of the reproductive, endocrine, hepatic, cardiovascular, immunological and gastrointestinal systems, although there is significant individual variability in response to lead exposure. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-6 Environmental Evaluation The NAAQS and CAAQS are shown in Table 2 below. TABLE 2 CALIFORNIA AND FEDERAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS Pollutant Averaging Time California Standards Federal Standards Primarya Secondaryb O3 1 Hour 0.09 ppm (180 µg/m3) – – 8 Hour 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) 0.070 ppm (137 µg/m3) Same as Primary PM10 24 Hour 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 Same as Primary AAM 20 µg/m3 – Same as Primary PM2.5 24 Hour – 35 µg/m3 Same as Primary AAM 12 µg/m3 12.0 µg/m3 15.0 µg/m3 CO 1 Hour 20 ppm (23 mg/m3) 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) – 8 Hour 9.0 ppm (10 mg/m3) 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) – 8 Hour (Lake Tahoe) 6 ppm (7 mg/m3) – – NO2 AAM 0.030 ppm (57 µg/m3) 0.053 ppm (100 µg/m3) Same as Primary 1 Hour 0.18 ppm (339 µg/m3) 0.100 ppm (188 µg/m3) – SO2 24 Hour 0.04 ppm (105 µg/m3) – – 3 Hour – – 0.5 ppm (1,300 µg/m3) 1 Hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3) 0.075 ppm (196 µg/m3) – Lead 30-day Avg. 1.5 µg/m3 – – Calendar Quarter – 1.5 µg/m3 Same as Primary Rolling 3-month Avg. – 0.15 µg/m3 Visibility Reducing Particles 8 Hour Extinction coefficient of 0.23 per km – visibility ≥ 10 miles (0.07 per km – ≥30 miles for Lake Tahoe) No Federal Standards Sulfates 24 Hour 25 µg/m3 Hydrogen Sulfide 1 Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3) Vinyl Chloride 24 Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3) O3: ozone; ppm: parts per million; µg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter; PM10: respirable particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; AAM: Annual Arithmetic Mean; –: No Standard; PM2.5: fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; CO: carbon monoxide; mg/m3: milligrams per cubic meter; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide; km: kilometer. a National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, within an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health. b National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. Note: More detailed information in the data presented in this table can be found at the CARB website (www.arb.ca.gov). Source: CARB 2016 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-7 Environmental Evaluation CARB, a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA), is responsible for coordinating and administering both the federal and State air pollution control programs in California. In this capacity, CARB conducts research, sets the CAAQS (as shown in Table 2), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, oversees local programs, and prepares the State Implementation Plan (SIP). For regions that do not attain the CAAQS, CARB requires the air districts to prepare plans for attaining the standards. These plans are then integrated into the SIP. CARB establishes emissions standards for (1) motor vehicles sold in California, (2) consumer products (e.g., hair spray, aerosol paints, barbecue lighter fluid), and (3) various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which includes: Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emissions sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary (area and point), mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs), which are included in the California SIP. Existing Air Quality Conditions The nearest air quality monitoring to the Project site is the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Monitoring Station located approximately 12.5 miles west of the Project site. Pollutants measured at this monitoring station include O3, PM10, PM2.5, NO2, CO. Monitoring data from the years 2017–2019 are shown in Table 3. Federal and State air quality standards are presented with the number of times those standards were exceeded. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-8 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 3 AIR QUALITY MONITORING DATA FROM THE ANAHEIM-PAMPAS LANE MONITORING STATION Pollutant California Standard National Standard Year Max. Levela State Standard Days Exceededb National Standard Days Exceededb, c O3 (1 hour) 0.09 ppm None 2017 0.09 0 NA 2018 0.112 1 NA 2019 0.096 1 NA O3 (8 hour) 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm 2017 0.076 4 4 2018 0.071 1 1 2019 0.082 1 1 PM10 (24 hour) 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 2017 128 17 (5%) 0 2018 129 13 (4%) 0 2019 127 13 (4%) 0 PM10 (AAM) 20 µg/m3 None 2017 26.3 NA NA 2018 27.2 NA NA 2019 21.9 NA NA NO2 (1 Hour) 0.18 ppm 0.100 ppm 2017 0.0812 0 0 2018 0.066 0 0 2019 0.0594 0 0 NO2 (AAM) 0.030 ppb 0.053 ppb 2017 14.2 -- -- 2018 13.7 -- -- 2019 12.7 -- -- CO (1 hour) 20.0 ppm 35.0 ppm 2017 2.5 0 0 2018 2.3 0 0 2019 2.4 0 0 CO (8 hour) 9.0 ppm 9.0 ppm 2017 2.1 0 0 2018 1.9 0 0 2019 1.3 0 0 PM2.5 (24 Hour) None 35 µg/m3 2017 53.9 NA 3 (0.9%) 2018 54.1 NA 3 (0.8%) 2019 36.1 NA 3 (0.9%) PM2.5 (AAM) 12 µg/m3 15 µg/m3 2017 11.39 NA NA 2018 11.02 NA NA 2019 9.32 NA NA O3: ozone; ppm: parts per million; PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less; µg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter; AAM: annual arithmetic mean; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; CO: carbon monoxide; PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less “–” indicates that the data are not reported or there is insufficient data available to determine the value. N/A indicates that there is no applicable standard. a California maximum levels were used. b For annual averaging times, a “Yes” or “No” response is given if the annual average concentration exceeded the applicable standard. c PM is measured once every 6 days. Where 2 values are shown for PM10 and PM2.5, the first is for the measured value, and the second is the percent of samples exceeded. Source: CARB 2021a When a region has air quality that fails to meet the standards, the USEPA and the CARB designate the region as “nonattainment” and the regional air quality agency must develop plans Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-9 Environmental Evaluation to attain the standards. These attainment designations are shown in Table 4. As identified in Table 4, Orange County is a nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5. TABLE 4 ATTAINMENT STATUS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS IN THE SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN Pollutant State Federal O3 (1 hour) Nonattainment No standards O3 (8 hour) Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance PM2.5 Nonattainment Serious Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment/Maintenance NO2 Attainment/Nonattainmentb Attainment/Maintenance SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment/Nonattainmenta All others Attainment/Unclassifiedc No standards O3: ozone; PM2.5: respirable particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; CO: carbon monoxide; NO2: nitrogen dioxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide; SoCAB: South Coast Air Basin. a Los Angeles County is classified nonattainment for lead; the remainder of the SoCAB is in attainment of the State and federal standards. b The near-road portion of CA-60 in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties is classified as nonattainment for NO2; the remainder of the SoCAB is in attainment of State standards. c “Unclassified” designation indicates that the air quality data for the area are incomplete and do not support a designation of attainment or nonattainment. Source: CARB 2021b, USEPA 2021b, SCAQMD 2016 Sensitive Air Quality Receptors Sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, children, the elderly, persons with preexisting respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise. These sensitive receptors include, but are not limited to, schools, parks, hospitals, high-density residential areas, and convalescent homes. The nearest sensitive air quality receptors to the Project site are single family homes on the north side of East Foxhollow Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the Project site. East Foxhollow Drive is approximately 100 feet higher in elevation than the Project site. Impact Analysis Thresholds of Significance Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district may be relied upon to make significance determinations. The South Coast AQMD has established significance thresholds to assess the regional and localized impacts of Project-related air pollutant emissions; Table 5 presents the current significance thresholds. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-10 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 5 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AIR QUALITY SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS Mass Daily Thresholdsa Pollutant Construction Operation NOx 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM10 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day PM2.5 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day SOx 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day CO 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day Lead 3 lbs/day 3 lbs/day TACs, Odor, and GHG Thresholds TACs (including carcinogens and non- carcinogens) Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk ≥ 10 in 1 million Cancer Burden > 0.5 excess cancer cases (in areas ≥ 1 in 1 million) Chronic & Acute Hazard Index ≥ 1.0 (project increment) Odor Project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to South Coast AQMD Rule 402 GHG 10,000 MT/yr CO2e for industrial facilities Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutantsb, c NO2 1-hour average annual arithmetic mean The South Coast AQMD is in attainment; the Project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: 0.18 ppm (State) 0.03 ppm (State) and 0.0534 ppm (federal) PM10 24-hour average annual average 10.4 µg/m3 (construction)c & 2.5 µg/m3 (operation) 1.0 µg/m3 PM2.5 24-hour average 10.4 µg/m3 (construction)c & 2.5 µg/m3 (operation) SO2 1-hour average 24-hour average 0.25 ppm (State) & 0.075 ppm (federal – 99th percentile) 0.04 ppm (State) Sulfate 24-hour average 25 µg/m3 (State) CO 1-hour average 8-hour average South Coast AQMD is in attainment; project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: 20.0 ppm (State) and 35 ppm (federal) 9.0 ppm (State/federal) Lead 30-day average Rolling 3-month average 1.5 µg/m3 (State) 0.15 µg/m3 (federal) NOx: nitrogen oxides, lbs/day: pounds per day, VOC: volatile organic compound, PM10: respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less, PM2.5: fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less, SOx: sulfur oxides, CO: carbon monoxide, TACs: toxic air contaminants, GHG: greenhouse gases, MT/yr CO2e: metric tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalents, NO2: nitrogen dioxide, ppm: parts per million, µg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter; South Coast AQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District a Source: South Coast AQMD CEQA Handbook (South Coast AQMD 1993) b Ambient air quality thresholds for criteria pollutants based on South Coast AQMD Rule 1303, Table A-2 unless otherwise stated c Ambient air quality threshold is based on South Coast AQMD Rule 403 Source: SCAQMD 2019 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-11 Environmental Evaluation Question A: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a project and applicable General Plans (GPs) and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the Project is the SCAQMD’s AQMP, which is discussed below. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that “New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP”. Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A project should be considered consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated for the Project, as shown below. With respect to the first criterion, based on the air quality modeling analysis conducted for the Project (see the discussion provided below under thresholds III (B) and III (C)), construction and operation of the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance and consequently would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations nor cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions in the AQMP. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the first criterion. With respect to the second criterion, the Project was assessed as to whether it would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. The SCAQMD’s current air quality planning document is the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP). The SCAQMD adopted the 2016 AQMP on March 3, 2017 (SCAQMD 2021). The 2016 AQMP is a regional and multi-agency effort among the SCAQMD, CARB, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and USEPA. The 2016 AQMP includes an analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures. The purpose of the 2016 AQMP is to set forth a comprehensive program that would promote reductions in criteria pollutants, greenhouse gases, and toxic risk and efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement. The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including SCAG’s 2016–2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS); updated emission inventory methods for various source categories; and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts (SCAG 2016). The 2016 AQMP includes strategies and measures necessary to meet the NAAQS. The AQMP is based on projections of energy usage and vehicle trips from land uses within the SoCAB. The City of Anaheim approved a CUP for the Project site approving its use as a church in 1988, with subsequent CUP amendments in 1998, 2004, and 2008 further expanding and modifying the church use. Furthermore, SP88-1 and SP88-2 acknowledged that a church would be built on the Project site. Therefore, it may be assumed that the current use is incorporated in the City’s planning documents which provide source data for the RTP/SCS and the AQMP. The Project Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-12 Environmental Evaluation would not change the use but would generate additional vehicle trips and associated air pollutant emissions. However, the emissions would be substantially less than the significance thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD as detailed in the emissions analyses in response to threshold III (B) below. As such, the Project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Project site and would be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Therefore, the Project would not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD’s 2016 AQMP. Less than significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact. Orange County is a nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5, as shown in Table 4. The Project would generate PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and O3 precursors (NOx and VOC) during short-term construction and long-term operations. Construction Impacts Construction-Related Regional Impacts A project may have a significant impact where project-related emissions would exceed federal, State, or regional standards or thresholds, or where project-related emissions would substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. A project with daily emission rates below the SCAQMD’s established air quality significance thresholds (shown in Table 5) would have a less than significant effect on regional air quality. Project emissions were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0 computer program (CAPCOA 2021). CalEEMod is designed to model construction and operational emissions for land development projects and allows for the input of project- and County-specific information. Project construction is planned to begin in 2022 and end in 2023. The CalEEMod input for construction emissions was based on the Project’s construction assumptions and default assumptions derived from CalEEMod. Demolition would include approximately 1,300 square feet of buildings, consisting of one small modular structure and portions of the auditorium. The Project would require grading work, which would result in approximately 300 cubic yards of cut and 2,900 cubic yards of fill. The Project would require the import of 2,600 cubic yards of fill from off-site, which would result in approximately 163 round-trip truckloads. Table 6 presents the estimated maximum daily emissions occurring both on-site and off-site during construction of the Project and compares the estimated emissions with the SCAQMD’s daily regional emission thresholds. As shown in Table 6, all criteria pollutants are below the SCAQMD’s respective thresholds. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-13 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 6 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Year Emissions (lbs/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 2021 2 18 11 <1 4 2 2022 17 16 12 <1 4 2 Maximum Emissions 17 18 12 <1 4 2 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds (Table 5) 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds SCAQMD Thresholds? No No No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compound; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; SOx: sulfur oxides; PM10: respirable particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. Source: SCAQMD 2019 (thresholds); see Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Data, for CalEEMod model outputs. Localized Criteria Pollutants from On-Site Construction In addition to the mass daily emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, short-term local impacts to nearby sensitive receptors from on-site emissions of NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 are examined based on SCAQMD localized significance threshold (LST) methodology. To assess local air quality impacts for development projects without complex dispersion modeling, the SCAQMD developed screening (lookup) tables to assist lead agencies in evaluating impacts. The LST method is limited to projects that are five acres or less. Given there would be active construction on only approximately one acre at a time within the Project site, this LST method is applicable to the Project. For the purposes of an LST analysis, the SCAQMD considers receptors where it is possible that an individual could remain for 1 hour for NO2 and CO exposure and 24 hours for PM10 and PM2.5 exposure. The emissions limits in the lookup tables are based on the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Significance Thresholds and CARB’s 1-hour NO2 AAQS. (SCAQMD 2008a). The closest off-site sensitive receptors to the Project Site are single family homes on the north side of Foxhollow Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the Project site. Table 7 shows the maximum daily on-site emissions for construction activities compared with the SCAQMD LSTs. The emissions thresholds are applicable for receptors within 91 meters (300 feet) of the Project site and a disturbance area of one acre per day; the thresholds for receptors farther away would be higher and the Project emissions would be a smaller fraction of the thresholds. The Project’s maximum daily on-site emissions of NOx would occur during the demolition phase; maximum on-site CO emissions would occur during the paving phase; and the maximum on-site emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 would occur during the grading phase. As shown in Table 7, the local emissions from the Project would be below the thresholds; therefore, no significant impacts would result and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-14 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 7 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Emissions and Thresholds Emissions (lbs/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Project maximum daily on-site emissions 16 10 4 2 SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholda 95 1,061 25 8 Exceed threshold? No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter. a Data is for SCAQMD Source Receptor Area 17, Central Orange County, 1 acre site, receptor at 300 feet (91 meters). Source: SCAQMD 2009 (thresholds); see Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Data, for CalEEMod outputs. Cumulative Construction Impacts Construction activities associated with the Project would result in less than significant construction-related regional and localized air quality impacts, as quantified above in Table 6 and Table 7. Short-term cumulative impacts related to air quality could occur if construction of the Project and other projects in the surrounding area were to occur simultaneously. In particular, with respect to local impacts, the consideration of cumulative construction particulate (PM10 and PM2.5) impacts is limited to cases when projects constructed simultaneously are within a few hundred yards of each other because of: (1) the combination of the short range (distance) of particulate dispersion (especially when compared to gaseous pollutants), and (2) the SCAQMD’s required dust-control measures, which further limit particulate dispersion from the Project site, including Rule 402 (Nuisance) and Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust). There are no known projects where concurrent construction would occur that could result in cumulative construction emissions with the Project. SCAQMD’s policy with respect to cumulative impacts associated with the above-referenced pollutants and their precursors is that impacts that would be directly less than significant on a project level would also be cumulatively less than significant (SCAQMD 2003). Because the Project’s construction emissions are below the SCAQMD’s regional and local significance thresholds, local construction emissions would not be cumulatively considerable, and the impact would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required. Operational Impacts Operational emissions are comprised of area, energy, and mobile source emissions. Because the church does not have natural gas service, there would be no energy-related emissions that is quantified within the CalEEMod model. The principal source of VOC, NOx, and CO emissions associated with the Project would result from vehicle trips. Area source emissions are based on CalEEMod assumptions for the specific land uses and size. Mobile source emissions are based on estimated Project-related trip generation forecasts, as contained in the Project traffic impact analysis. The Project would generate 80 daily trips and 272 Sunday trips4 (AGA 2021). The peak day operational emissions for VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions that would be created from the Project’s long-term operation have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 8. 4 The Trip Generation Memorandum analyzed trip generation for the Project using two methods. The higher trip generation estimate is presented and analyzed in this section to provide a worst-case scenario for the purposes of operational air quality impacts. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-15 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 8 PEAK DAILY OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS Source Emissions (lbs/day)* VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Area sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy sources 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile sources 1 <1 6 <1 1 <1 Total Operational Emissions* 1 <1 6 <1 1 <1 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds (Table 5) 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No lbs/day: pounds per day; VOC: volatile organic compound; NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; SOx: sulfur oxides; PM10: respirable particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. * Values are the higher of summer or winter. Source: SCAQMD 2019 (thresholds); see Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Data, for CalEEMod model outputs. The data provided in Table 8 shows that emissions of the analyzed criteria pollutants would be substantially less than the operational emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Project and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Operational Impacts As shown in Table 8, operational emissions of VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 would be below the SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds. Consistent with the approach described above (under Cumulative Construction Impacts), SCAQMD’s policy with respect to cumulative impacts associated with the above-referenced pollutants and their precursors is that impacts that would be directly less than significant on a project-level would also be cumulatively less than significant. Therefore, because the Project’s operational emissions are less than the respective SCAQMD daily operational thresholds, the Project’s operations phase activities would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable net increase of a pollutant for which the SoCAB is in nonattainment. Emissions of nonattainment pollutants or their precursors would not be cumulatively considerable and would be less than significant; no mitigation would be required. Cumulative Health Impacts The SoCAB is designated as nonattainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, which means that the background levels of those pollutants are, at times, higher than the ambient air quality standards. The air quality standards were set to protect public health, including the health of sensitive individuals (the elderly, children, and the sick). Therefore, when the concentrations of those pollutants exceed the standard, it is likely that some sensitive individuals in the population would experience health effects. These health effects are not identified for specific individual receptors nor does the analysis identify the magnitude of health effects. The regional analysis detailed above found that the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5. As such, the Project would result in a less than significant cumulative health impact. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-16 Environmental Evaluation Question C: Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur when a project would generate pollutant concentrations to a degree that would significantly affect sensitive receptors, which include populations that are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. Exposure of sensitive receptors is addressed for construction and operation of the Project in the sections below. Construction Criteria Pollutants from On-Site Construction Local impacts from on-site construction emissions of criteria pollutants were analyzed in threshold III(B) above. As shown in Table 8 and the accompanying text, emissions would be less than significant. Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions from On-Site Construction Construction activities would result in short-term, project-generated emissions of diesel particulate matter (DPM) from the exhaust of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment used for site preparation (e.g., demolition, excavation, and grading); paving; building construction; and other miscellaneous activities. CARB identified DPM as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) in 1998. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the duration of exposure to the substance. Thus, the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual (MEI) are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer time period. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), health risk assessments—which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions—should be based on a 40-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the Project. There would be relatively few pieces of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment in operation, and the total construction period would be relatively short when compared to a 40-year exposure period. Combined with the highly dispersive properties of DPM and additional reductions in particulate emissions from newer construction equipment, as required by USEPA and CARB regulations, construction emissions of TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Operational Criteria Pollutants and Toxic Air Contaminants from On-site Operations Operational criterial pollutants and TACs may be generated by industrial and commercial land uses (e.g., gas stations, bus terminals, and dry cleaners). Church land uses do not generate substantial quantities of criteria pollutants or TACs. On-site emissions associated with the operation of the church would involve diesel truck exhaust related to deliveries of supplies and to a lesser extent, passenger vehicles. However, the low frequency of occurrence, the low quantity of vehicles and the brevity of exposure would result in very low levels of emissions from the Project site. As such, the impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-17 Environmental Evaluation Exposure to Off-Site Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions The CARB “Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective” provides guidance concerning land use compatibility with TAC sources (CARB 2005). While not a law or adopted policy, the handbook offers advisory recommendations for siting sensitive receptors near uses associated with TACs (such as freeways and high-traffic roads, commercial distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, dry cleaners, gasoline stations, and industrial facilities) to help keep children and other sensitive populations out of harm’s way. CARB identifies sensitive land uses as schools, schoolyards, parks and playgrounds, daycare centers, nursing homes, hospitals and residential communities. Projects of concern for mobile sources of TACs are typically those located within 500 feet of the following types of facilities that emit significant quantities of DPM: urban roads with more than 100,000 vehicles per day; freeways or roads with a high heavy truck concentration; and/or near rail yards, ports, and/or distribution centers. The Project site is not within 500 feet of urban roads with more than 100,000 vehicles per day, freeways or roads with a high heavy-truck concentration, or near a railyard, port and and/or a distribution center. The Project site is located approximately 600 feet from the SR-91 freeway, which is greater than the 500-foot vicinity identified in the Handbook. With respect to proximity to emissions from railroad sources, CARB recommends avoiding siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard; the Project site is not located within 1,000 feet of this type of facility. CARB recommends avoiding siting residences within 300 feet of a large gas station or within 500 feet of dry-cleaning operations with two machines using perchloroethylene. The Project does not propose residential uses and there are no large gas stations within 300 feet of the Project site or dry cleaners within 500 feet of the Project site. As such, the Project will not result in significant impacts related to the exposure of church staff or attendees to excessive levels of TACs. Carbon Monoxide Hotspot In an urban setting, vehicle exhaust is the primary source of CO. Consequently, the highest CO concentrations generally are found close to congested intersections. Under typical meteorological conditions, CO concentrations tend to decrease as the distance from the emissions source (e.g., a congested intersection) increases. Therefore, for purposes of providing a conservative worst- case analysis, CO concentrations typically are analyzed at congested intersection locations. If impacts are less than significant close to congested intersections, impacts also would be less than significant at more distant sensitive-receptor and other locations. An initial screening procedure is provided in the “Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol” (CO Protocol) to determine whether a project has the potential to generate a CO hotspot (Niemeier et al. 1997). The key criterion is whether the Project would worsen traffic congestion at any signalized intersections operating at level of service (LOS) E or F. If a project is determined to pose a potential for a CO hotspot, a quantitative screening would then be required. The Project would generate 80 daily trips and 272 Sunday trips5 (AGA 2021). Given the low quantity of trips generated by the Project, the Project would not generate sufficient traffic to worsen traffic conditions and pose a potential for a CO hotspot. The impact would be less than significant and no mitigation is required related to this threshold. 5 The Trip Generation Memorandum analyzed trip generation for the Project using two methods. The higher trip generation estimate is presented and analyzed in this section to provide a worst-case scenario for the purposes of operational air quality impacts. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-18 Environmental Evaluation Question D: Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than Significant Impact. Project construction would use equipment and activities that could result in other emissions, such as those leading to odors. Potential construction odors include on-site construction equipment’s diesel exhaust emissions as well as roofing, painting, and paving operations. There may be situations where construction activity odors could be noticed. However, these odors would be temporary and would dissipate rapidly from the source with an increase in distance. These odors would not be of such magnitude that they would constitute a public nuisance. Therefore, the impacts would be short-term; would not affect a substantial number of people; and would be less than significant. According to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, sewer treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding (SCAQMD 1993). The Project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors, and therefore, would not likely produce objectionable odors. The nature of activities associated with churches would not result in the generation of odors that would generate a public nuisance. There would be a less than significant impact and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program The Project was found to result in less than significant air quality impacts from the construction and operations phases and consequently no mitigation measures are required or recommended. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-19 Environmental Evaluation IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The information in this section is derived from the Biological Resources Constraints Analysis prepared for the Project by Psomas, which is provided as Appendix B (Psomas 2021). Question A: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. No native vegetation types or suitable habitat for any special status plant or wildlife species occurs on the Project site. No direct impact to any special status species is anticipated as a result of the Project. The following federally- and/or State-listed Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate wildlife species have potential to occur adjacent to the Project site and could be subject to indirect impacts (such as noise and vibration) associated with the Project: coastal California gnatcatcher, a federally-listed Threatened species. Any impact to federally-listed Threatened species are typically considered significant; however, potential indirect impacts to coastal California gnatcatcher would already be mitigated under the Federal Endangered Species Act per the take coverage provided in the terms of the Central/Coastal National Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP). The Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP does not provide take coverage of active bird nests under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. Potential impacts to nesting CAGN and other nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant levels by implementing mitigation measure (MM) BIO-1, which requires that a nesting bird survey be conducted if construction and/or vegetation clearing need to occur during the nesting bird season. If any active coastal California gnatcatcher nests are found, they would be protected by a minimum 500-foot buffer until inactive. The following California Species of Special Concern (SSC) have potential to occur adjacent to the Project site and could be subject to indirect impacts associated with the Project: coast range newt, coastal whiptail, red-diamond rattlesnake, coast patch-nosed snake, coastal cactus wren, grasshopper sparrow, pallid bat, and western mastiff bat. Cooper’s hawk, an additional SSC, has potential to nest both on and adjacent to the Project site. Impacts to any bird species during its nesting activities, including coastal cactus wren, grasshopper sparrow, and Cooper’s hawk, would be a violation of the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code and would be considered significant. Impacts to nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant by implementing MM BIO-1 which requires nesting bird and raptor surveys and avoidance if active nests are found. Potential indirect impacts to SSC not otherwise addressed by bird nesting measures are considered less than significant because the Project would not reduce the populations of these species below self-sustaining levels or substantially remove habitat for these species. Potential indirect impacts to any special status plant species adjacent to the Project site resulting from dust accumulation would be less than significant. No impacts to any federally designated Critical Habitat or to habitat of any other special status plant or wildlife species would occur as a result of the Project. No additional measures are recommended. Question B: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-20 Environmental Evaluation Question C: Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. A drainage feature that is potentially jurisdictional under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) extends along the eastern boundary of the Project site. The limits of jurisdiction for USACE and/or Santa Ana RWQCB are restricted to the bed and banks for this feature which generally occur outside of the Project site boundaries and no impacts are anticipated. The limits of jurisdiction for CDFW, however, includes the coast live oak forest which extends into the Project site boundaries. No tree or vegetation removal within any area associated with this coast live oak forest or associated drainage feature would occur as part of the Project and no impacts are anticipated. A roadside drainage ditch also occurs along the south side of East Santa Ana Canyon Road (along the northern boundary of the Project site). This feature does not contain any wetland or riparian vegetation, but has potential to be considered jurisdictional by the USACE, Santa Ana RWQCB, and CDFW due to potential connectivity to other drainage features, and ultimately to the Santa Ana River. This feature occurs outside the impact boundary of the Project and no impacts would occur. Therefore, the Project would have no impact to any wetlands or other jurisdictional areas pursuant to the USACE, Santa Ana RWQCB, or CDFW. No mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The existing developed conditions at the Project site, including physical buildings, lighting, and human activity, currently limit or deter wildlife movement between the open space land uses to the west and east of the Project site. Regardless, the Project consists of the redevelopment of an existing developed Project site consistent with the existing land uses on the Project site. Aspects of the Project that could further constrain wildlife movement including the addition and relocation of structures, removal of vegetation, and the addition of lighting throughout the Project site. Any of these new effects to wildlife movement resulting from the Project would not likely result in a significant effect to regional wildlife movement. Impacts to wildlife movement corridors would be less than significant. The vegetation on and adjacent to the Project site provides suitable nesting habitat for bird species protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. A routine construction practice to avoid impacts is to schedule tree and vegetation removal outside of the breeding season and to instead conducting vegetation removal during the non-nesting bird season (i.e., September 1 to February 14). If construction or vegetation removal activities must occur during the nesting season, impacts to actively nesting bird species protected under the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code could occur. Therefore, implementation of MM BIO-1, which requires a pre-construction nesting bird survey and avoidance of active nests, and MM BIO-2, which requires avoidance of vegetation removal during the bat maternity season, a pre-construction bat survey, and the avoidance of bat roosts during the maternity season, would ensure the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to wildlife movement and native nursery sites. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-21 Environmental Evaluation Question E: Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would require vegetation removal, including the removal of approximately 29 trees, within the City’s SC Overlay Zone. The Project has been designed consistent with the applicable Municipal Code policies related to the SC Overlay Zone as codified Chapter 18.18 of the City’s Municipal Code (Anaheim 2021). However, the Project is exempt from tree preservation requirements, including the need to obtain a tree removal permit, given that all of the trees proposed for removal were originally planted by the property owner and the trees are not located in an area highly visible from a public or private right-of-way. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result from Project activities related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question F: Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located within the boundaries of the Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP; however, it is not within a Reserve Area or Special Linkage Area as designated within the NCCP/HCP and no direct impacts to Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP would result from the Project. The eastern boundary of Project site is immediately adjacent to two parcels that are protected within conservation easements. These parcels are part of the Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP reserve area. Indirect impacts of the Project on the function of the conservation easement areas would result potentially from additional human activity on the Project site as well as additional noise, which would be less than significant. Also, the Project’s proposed night lighting has the potential to affect the function of this conservation easement area. However, the Project design identifies that all new and replaced pole mounted light fixtures would consist of downcast, shielded lighting. This would focus new Project lighting on-site and would minimize illumination of the adjacent conservation easement. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant due to the Project’s design and no mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Program The following mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts to less than significant levels and will be incorporated into the Mitigation Program for this IS/MND. MM BIO-1 To avoid impacts to nesting birds and raptors, construction should be scheduled between September 1 and February 14, which is outside the peak nesting season. If construction and/or vegetation removal must occur during the peak nesting season (i.e., February 15–August 31), a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within seven days prior to the start of Project construction activities. If the Biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to the construction area, the Biologist will identify an appropriate protective buffer zone around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species, the nature of the construction activity, and the amount of existing disturbance in the vicinity. In general, the Biologist shall designate a buffer between 10 to 300 feet for common nesting birds, between 200 to 500 feet for common nesting raptors, and a minimum of 500 feet for any nesting special status bird species. No construction activities shall be allowed within the buffer until the nest is deemed to be no longer active by the Biologist to ensure compliance with the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-22 Environmental Evaluation MM BIO-2 To avoid impacts on maternity roosting bats, tree removal shall occur outside the bat maternity season (i.e., April through August) to the extent feasible. In addition, a pre-construction roost emergence survey shall be conducted no more than one year prior to the start of Project vegetation removal associated with construction by a qualified biologist. Trees and/or structures that are being used by roosting bats and those within 100 feet of an active roost may not be removed during the maternity season to avoid impacts on an active maternity roost, which may include juvenile bats that cannot fly. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Information in this section is based on records searches and literature reviews of information available from the South-Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) that were conducted in 2021. Due to the previously disturbed nature of the Project site, a field survey was not warranted. IMPACT ANALYSIS Question A: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? No Impact. A cultural resources records search was conducted on March 22, 2021 by the South- Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton. The SCCIC is a designated branch of the California Historical Resources Information System and houses records regarding archaeological and historic resources recorded in San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties. The 2021 review consisted of an examination of the U.S. Geological Survey’s 7.5-minute Black Star Canyon Quadrangle to determine if any sites are recorded or if any cultural resources studies have been conducted on or within a ½-mile radius of the Project site. Data sources consulted at the SCCIC include archaeological records, Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (DOE), historic maps, and the Historic Property Data File (HPDF) maintained by the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The HPDF contains listings for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and/or the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI). The records search and literature review conducted for the Project revealed that 32 cultural resource studies have been conducted within ½-mile of the Project site. The studies consisted of archaeological field studies (surface surveys and excavations), literature reviews and record searches, and management and planning documents. Eleven of the 32 prior studies occurred within the Project site between 1979 and 2013. These studies include eight archaeological field studies (OR-00622, OR-00752, OR-02383, OR-02534, OR-02883, OR-03029, OR-03037, and OR-03344), one analysis of a literature review and records search (OR-00305), one cultural resource mitigation monitoring report (OR-01030), and one management/planning document (OR-02225). Three cultural resources are identified within the ½-mile search radius of the Project site. These include one prehistoric lithic scatter (P-30-000303), one prehistoric lithic scatter and associated rock shelter (P-30-001710), and one built environment resource (P-30-161876). One of the three cultural resources (P-30-161876), the built environment resource, was identified by the SCCIC as being located within the Project site. P-30-161876 is recorded as a modern ranch house (Circle C Horse Ranch) with an adjoining barn. The ranch dates to the 1920s and was remodeled in approximately 1954. According to site records, after careful inspection, investigation, and evaluation, George Case of PBO&D (1991) concluded that the property does not appear to be Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-23 Environmental Evaluation eligible for individual listing in the National Register and California Register, or eligible for local designation as a Historically Significant Structure due to a lack of significance through survey evaluation. The ranch structures have since been demolished. Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search The City submitted a request to the NAHC to review the Sacred Lands File (SLF) database regarding the possibility of Native American cultural resources and/or sacred places in the Project vicinity that are not documented on other databases. The results from the NAHC were received on February 24, 2021. The SLF search did not identify any known resources or sacred lands within the Project site. However, the NAHC recommends that the City contact tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area. The City contacted the tribes listed on their consultation list on March 16, 2021 as part of the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) tribal consultation process. The tribal consultation results are discussed under threshold XVIII (Tribal Cultural Resources). A significant impact could occur if the Project were to disturb historic resources that presently exist within the Project site. Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines generally defines a historic resource as a resource that is (1) listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register); (2) included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code); or (3) identified as significant in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code). Additionally, any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript that a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register. The California Register automatically includes all properties listed in the NRHP and those formally determined to be eligible for listing in the National Register. As discussed above, the SCCIC record search and literature review identified three cultural resources within a ½-mile radius of the Project. One of the cultural resources (P-30-161876), the Circle C Horse Ranch was documented within the Project site but was determined to not be eligible for individual listing in the National Register and California Register, or eligible for local designation as a Historically Significant Structure due to a lack of significance through survey evaluation. Furthermore, the building in question has since been demolished and is no longer a standing structure within the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource subject to CEQA. The Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A significant impact would occur if grading or excavation activities associated with the Project were to disturb archaeological resources that presently exist within the Project site. The SCCIC record search and literature review identified three resources located within a half-mile of the Project site. These resources consist of two prehistoric archaeological sites (lithic scatters and a rock shelter) and one historic-era building and associated structures that establish prehistoric and historic-era land use within the generalized area. As described above, one resource, P-30-161876, the Circle C Horse Ranch was documented within the Project site and has since been demolished/removed from the site. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-24 Environmental Evaluation As such, there is the possibility that undiscovered intact archaeological resources may be present below the surface in native (alluvial) sediments. These potential effects would be mitigated to a less than significant level with the implementation of MM CUL-1, which requires archaeological monitoring when excavations are required in native sediment. Question C: Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact. A significant adverse effect could occur if grading or excavation activities associated with the Project were to disturb previously interred human remains. The Project site is located within a developed area that has been subject to earth-moving activities in the past, and no known burial sites are located on or adjacent to the Project site. In the unlikely event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains in the Project site during construction, the California Health and Safety Code and the California Public Resources Code require that any activity in the area of a potential find be halted and the Orange County Coroner be notified, as described in regulatory requirement (RR) CUL-1. Implementation of RR CUL-1 would ensure impacts related to this threshold are less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program Regulatory Requirement RR CUL-1 If human remains are found during ground-disturbing activities, no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The County Coroner shall be notified of the discovery immediately. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are or believed to be Native American, s/he shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours of the discovery. In accordance with Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The descendants shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site by the City. The City would meet and confer with the most likely descendant regarding their recommendations prior to disturbing the site by further construction activity. Mitigation Measure MM CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide written evidence to the City that the applicant has retained an Orange County-certified archaeologist to observe grading activities within previously undisturbed soils, and to salvage and catalogue archaeological resources as necessary. The archaeologist shall be present at the pre-grade conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance within previously undisturbed soils, and shall establish, in cooperation with the applicant, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate. If archaeological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the archaeologist and City shall be notified immediately. If the archaeological resources are found to be significant, the archeologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-25 Environmental Evaluation salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. VI. ENERGY Energy efficiency is a priority for both the State of California and the City of Anaheim. The following are regulatory targets and requirements that have been adopted at the State and local level. State The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]) were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The current 2019 Standards, effective January 1, 2020, are projected to result in a 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency for nonresidential buildings over the 2016 standards. The 2019 standards require photovoltaic solar systems on single-family residences and on multifamily residential structures of three stories or less. Single-family homes built to the 2019 standards would be about 7 percent more efficient than homes built to the 2016 standards without considering the required solar systems; and about 53 percent more efficient after factoring in the solar systems (CEC 2018). The 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (24 CCR, Part 11), also known as the CALGreen code, contains mandatory requirements and voluntary measures for new residential and nonresidential buildings (including buildings for hotel, retail, office, public schools and hospitals) throughout California (CBSC 2019). The development of the CALGreen Code is intended to improve public health, safety, and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the following construction practices: (1) planning and design; (2) energy efficiency; (3) water efficiency and conservation; (4) material conservation and resource efficiency; and (5) environmental quality (CBSC 2019). In short, the code is established to reduce construction waste; make buildings more efficient in the use of materials and energy; and reduce environmental impact during and after construction. The Anaheim Municipal Code adopts the CALGreen Code by reference with specific amendments. The Project would promote building energy efficiency through compliance with energy efficiency standards (Title 24 and CALGreen). City of Anaheim General Plan The following policies of the City of Anaheim’s General Plan are relevant to energy efficiency and generation. Green Element Policy 15.1.1: Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and information provided on the City’s website. Policy 15.2.1: Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). Policy 15.2.2: Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. Policy 15.2.3: Continue to provide free energy audits for the public. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-26 Environmental Evaluation Policy 17.1.1: Encourage designs that incorporate solar and wind exposure features such as daylighting design, natural ventilation, space planning and thermal massing. Public Services and Facilities Element Policy 3.1.1: Encourage the development and use of renewable energy resources. Municipal Code The 2019 California Energy Code (CCR Title 24 Part 6), which includes the Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings, is adopted, with specified amendments, as Anaheim Municipal Code Section 15.03.10.0106. The 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CCR Title 24 Part 11) is adopted, with specified amendments, as Anaheim Municipal Code Section 15.03.10.0109. Anaheim Public Utilities Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan The Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD)’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHGRP), was approved in 2015 and updated in 2020. The GHGRP identifies renewable energy and energy conservation targets for APUD for the years 2020, 2030 and 2045. The GHGRP identifies renewables portfolio targets for increasing the APUD power supply generated from renewable sources up to 33 percent by year 2020, 60 percent by year 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. As of 2020, 34,000 kilowatt (kW) of photovoltaic systems were installed, and 50,000 kW and 75,000 kW of photovoltaic systems will be installed by 2030 and 2045, respectively. The GHGRP also establishes transportation-related goals for APUD to convert its fleet vehicles to result in emissions reductions of 500 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) in 2020, 1,200 MTCO2e in 2030 and 32,000 MTCO2e in 2045 (APUD 2020). Question A: Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less than Significant Impact. Construction Energy Use Project construction would require the use of construction equipment for demolition, grading, hauling, and building activities. Construction would also include the use of vehicles for construction workers and vendors traveling to and from the Project site and on-road haul trucks for the export of materials from demolition activities, as well as the import of soil for grading. Off-road construction equipment use was calculated using the equipment data (vehicle types, hours per day, horsepower, load factor) provided in the CalEEMod construction output files included in Appendix A. The total horsepower hours for construction equipment used for the Project was then multiplied by fuel usage rates to obtain the total fuel usage for off-road equipment. Fuel consumption from construction worker, vendor, and delivery/haul trucks was calculated using the trip rates and distances provided in the CalEEMod construction output files. Total vehicle miles traveled (VMT) was then calculated for each type of construction-related trip and divided by the fuel consumption factor from California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) EMission FACtors (EMFAC) 2017 model. EMFAC provides the total annual VMT and fuel consumed for each vehicle type. Construction vendor and delivery/haul trucks were assumed to be heavy-duty diesel trucks. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-27 Environmental Evaluation As shown in Table 9, the Project would consume an estimated total of 5,009 gallons of diesel fuel and 4,716 gallons of gasoline during construction. TABLE 9 ENERGY USE DURING CONSTRUCTION Source Gasoline - gallons Diesel Fuel - gallons Off-road Construction Equipment 17 3,981 Worker commute 3,964 16 Vendors 734 10 On-road haul 1 1,002 Total 4,716 5,009 Sources: CalEEMod, Offroad and EMFAC2017. Fuel energy consumed during construction would be temporary in nature and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. Construction equipment would conform to applicable CARB emissions standards, which promote equipment fuel efficiencies. Construction contractors would be required to comply with the provisions of California Code of Regulations Title 13 Sections 2485, which prohibit diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles and off-road diesel vehicles from idling for more than 5 minutes and would minimize unnecessary fuel consumption. It should be noted that fuel efficiencies are improving for on- and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements. Construction energy consumption would represent a “single-event” demand and would not require ongoing or permanent commitment of energy resources. Furthermore, there are no unusual Project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy-efficient than comparable equipment at construction sites in other parts of the State. Therefore, the proposed construction activities would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary fuel consumption and a less than significant impact would occur. Operations Phase Energy Use Energy consumption associated with operation of the Project consists of electricity for lighting, electronic devices, and for space heating. Electricity estimates were calculated by the CalEEMod model. Transportation related energy consumption of gasoline and diesel fuel was calculated based on the quantity of vehicles, average travel distance, vehicle class and fuel efficiency of each vehicle class as provided by the EMFAC model. Energy consumption calculations are included in Appendix C. The CalEEMod based estimates that Project-generated traffic would use 129 gallons of diesel fuel and 10,530 gallons of gasoline per year, as shown in Table 10 below. Fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips generated by the Project are not substantial and would assist local communities with meeting their religious worship needs. With the increasing adoption of electric vehicles in Southern California, the average fuel efficiency for transportation will continue to increase. As such, the Project’s transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-28 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 10 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY (GALLONS/YEAR) Source Gasoline Fuel Diesel Fuel Project 10,530 129 Sources: CalEEMod, EMFAC2017 As shown in Table 11, anticipated electricity consumption for the Project is estimated to be 152,255 kilowatts-hours per year (kWh/yr). These energy estimates are based on the 2016 Title 24 standards incorporated into the CalEEMod model. The Project would follow the 2019 Title 24 standards, which would result in less electricity than presented in Table 11. Development of buildings that comply with the latest energy efficiency standards adopted by the State would not result in inefficient, wasteful and unnecessary consumption of energy. Operationally, there would be a small increase in vehicle trips compared to current operations. New energy requirements would be minimal, primarily lighting, heating, and air conditioning for the enlarged auditorium and additional modular structures. Operational energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary and a less than significant impact would occur. TABLE 11 ENERGY FROM UTILITIES Source Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Electricity (kWh/yr) Project 0 152,255 Sources: CalEEMod Question B: Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? No Impact. The Project would be required to comply with the State of California’s Title 24 Building Standards where applicable. As discussed previously, the latest building standards incorporate the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) building energy efficiency standards which would reduce energy consumption for the Project by over 30 percent compared to the existing Title 24 Building Standards. The Project would also comply with applicable CALGreen standards. Because the operation of the Project would result in a minimal increase in energy consumption, and because the Project would be constructed consistent with State and local renewable energy and energy efficiency plans, the Project would have no impact related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS The following analysis is partially based on the Percolation Testing Results for WQMP, Pavement Design, and Building Expansion Foundation Recommendations, Kindred Church, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California (soils report), which was prepared by TGR Geotechnical, Inc. in November 2020 (Appendix D). Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-29 Environmental Evaluation Question A: Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site and the entire Southern California region are subject to secondary effects from earthquakes. The California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application (EQ Zapp) is an interactive map that shows earthquake fault zones and seismic hazard zones in relation to any parcel in California. According to a review of EQ Zapp, the Project site is not located within a mapped Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (DOC 2021b). Furthermore, there are no known Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within the City limits, although there are active and potentially active faults located close to the City. The City is situated between two active fault zones: the Newport-Inglewood zone located to the southwest and the Whittier-Elsinore fault zone located to the northeast. Other potentially active faults in close proximity to the Project site are the El Modeno, Peralta Hills, and Norwalk faults (Anaheim 2004). The potential for ground rupture due to fault movement is generally considered related to the seismic activity of known fault zones (Tulane 2016). Due to the distance of the closest active fault, ground rupture is not considered a significant hazard at the Project site. Implementation of the Project would be consistent with existing codes and regulations, including the Uniform Building Code, the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim 2021a), and the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act (California Public Resources Code §§2621 et seq.). Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to rupture of a known earthquake fault, and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site, as with the entire Southern California region, is subject to secondary effects from earthquakes. The site is located proximate to several active faults; therefore, during the life of the Project, the property would likely experience similar moderate to occasionally high ground shaking from these fault zones as well as some background shaking from other seismically active areas in the Southern California region. Implementation of the Project would not change the intensity of ground shaking that would occur on the Project site during a seismic event, but it would increase exposure to people through the addition of modular buildings and capacity within the auditorium building. The proposed buildings would be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building Code (CBC) (CBSC 2019). The CBC contains minimum standards regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, retaining walls, and other building elements to control the effects of seismic ground shaking and adverse soil conditions. The CBC includes provisions for earthquake safety based on factors such as occupancy type, the types of soil and rock on-site, and the strength of ground motion that may occur at the Project site. Project implementation would also occur consistent with the recommendations outlined in the Project’s soils report (TGR Geotechnical, Inc., 2020). Based on the findings of the soils report, the Project is geotechnically feasible provided that the recommendations in the soils report are incorporated during the Project’s final design and construction phase. Seismic design parameters have been included in the soils report based on the seismic zone, soil profile, and proximity of known faults to the Project Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-30 Environmental Evaluation site, which provide the minimum design procedures necessary to avoid significant damage to the structure. Compliance with the applicable regulations and design recommendations from the soils report as part of Project design and construction would ensure that any impacts resulting from strong seismic ground shaking at the Project site would be less than significant. Question A: Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact. As shown in the Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Black Star Canyon Quadrangle map, (California Geological Survey 2001), lower elevations within the Project site (e.g., areas to the north) are mapped as areas where there have been historical occurrences of liquefaction, or areas where local geological, geotechnical, and ground water conditions indicate a potential for permanent ground displacements. However, as noted in the soils report, the Project site was previously mass graded associated with a neighboring residential development. The Project site is generally underlain with compacted artificial fill overlaying landslide debris and/or debris fill. Additionally the auditorium building was constructed on compacted artificial fill overlaying bedrock. Furthermore, according to the Project’s PWQMP, groundwater is at least 18.5 feet below the Project site (Anacal Engineering 2021). Given the soils on the Project site are not susceptible to liquefaction, groundwater levels are low, and the soils were previously compacted, no impact would occur related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (iv) Landslides? Less Than Significant Impact. Earthquake-induced land sliding often occurs in areas where previous landslides have moved and in areas where the topographic, geologic, geotechnical, and subsurface groundwater conditions are conducive to permanent ground displacements. There are four occurrences of landslides (e.g., scarps) in the Project vicinity according to the California Landslide Inventory maintained by the Department of Conservation, which provides record of landslides mapped by the California Geological Survey (CGS) over the past 50 years (DOC 2021c). None of these four scarps occur within the Project site. Also, as shown in the Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Black Star Canyon Quadrangle map (California Geological Survey 2001), the Project site is located adjacent to hillsides that are designated as Earthquake-Induced Landslide Zones. These hillsides are west of the Project site, generally south of East Santa Ana Canyon Road and west of the Project’s driveway and entry road. Given that no structures or outdoor gathering areas are proposed within or adjacent to areas susceptible to landslides, less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Project construction would expose soils on the site, which could result in soil erosion and the loss of topsoil if not implemented consistent with regulatory requirements. A primary source of erosion and topsoil loss is uncontrolled drainage during Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-31 Environmental Evaluation construction. As discussed in more detail in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into “waters of the U.S.”. Construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with the statewide NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with the Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No 2012- 0006-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002), adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) on July 17, 2012. In compliance with the NPDES permit, erosion potential during construction of the Project would be managed with Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented on the Project site as part of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities in accordance with NPDES requirements. Also, once built the Project would increase impervious surface coverage on the Project site, which could lead to erosion and loss of topsoil if stormwater is not conveyed and dissipated appropriately. The Project site is already partially developed; however, the Project would increase impervious surface area by approximately 17 percent (Anacal Engineering 2021). A PWQMP has been prepared for the Project, which specifies preliminary measures to mitigate potential water quality impacts that might result from Project operations (Anacal Engineering 2021). In the existing condition, the majority of the Project site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing City storm drain that traverses the Project site, which was constructed for the adjacent residential development to the south. However, as part of the Project and as specified in the PWQMP, stormwater flows would be redirected from throughout the Project site to a new 18-inch RCP. The RCP would collect and convey flows downslope to an underground infiltration system, which would consist of two underground stormwater infiltration chambers within a portion of APN 354-321-03. In the event of stormwater exceeding the design capture volume for the underground infiltration chamber, excess water would be rerouted to the existing City storm drain through an 18-inch RCP overflow pipe. Prior to flowing into the 18-inch RCP, at least 50 percent of stormwater would be pre-treated for sediment, debris, and hydrocarbons using Filterra stormwater biofiltration units. Catch basins would be installed with FloGard filters to capture trash and debris. These improvements are depicted in Exhibit 17 and described in more detail in the Project’s (PWQMP (Anacal Engineering 2021). With implementation of a SWPPP during construction as well as construction and maintenance of the BMPs specified in the grading plan and construction of a new drainage and infiltration system, impacts related to erosion would be less than significant. Question C: Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Threshold VII(a)(iv) above, the Project would not be significantly impacted by on- or off-site landslides. Lateral spreading, a phenomenon associated with liquefaction, is a function of ground shaking and may occur during an earthquake. As discussed under the analysis of Threshold VII(a)(iii) above, impacts from seismic-related ground failure related to liquefaction for the Project would be less than significant. Similarly, there would be less than significant impacts related to lateral spreading. Land subsidence and collapse can occur due to the loss of surface elevation from the removal of subsurface support, usually due to the withdrawal of groundwater, oil, or natural gas. The Project involves no activities which would increase risk of soil collapse. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result from the Project related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-32 Environmental Evaluation Question D: Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Section 1803.5.3 of the California Building Code (2010), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated in the soils report (Appendix D), the Project site contains soils that possess a medium expansion potential (TGR Geotechnical, Inc. 2020). The recommendations provided in the soils report account for the expansion potential of the on-site soils, particularly related to concrete flatwork, which is any poured surface that moves along a horizontal plane such as patios, walkways, sidewalks, foundations, driveways and any other flat surface. Specifically, due to the presence of medium expansive soils, more than normal movement of the flatwork installed as part of the Project is anticipated. This will be limited through Project design, which has incorporated a thickened edge on flatwork (minimum of 12-inches) and/or 6-inches of base under the flatwork. Also, the slab-on-grade foundation used for Project structures shall comply with Section 1808.6.2 of the CBC (2019). Alternatively, the soils report allows for the slab-on-grade to instead be supported on a minimum 2 feet of non-expansive soil to reduce the impact of expansive soils. With implementation of recommendations from the soils report, any potential effects related to expansive soils would be minimized. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result from the Project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question E: Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. An existing septic tank and leach line system exists within the Project site, which is used to treat and dispose of sewer water that is generated by the existing church. The Project would not require any upgrades to the existing system or any new septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question F: Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A paleontological records search was requested from the Natural History Museum (LACM) of Los Angeles County, Vertebrate Paleontology Department and results were received on April 9, 2021. The results indicate that there are no fossil localities that lie directly within the Project site; however, there are fossil localities nearby from the same sedimentary deposits that occur in the Project site, either at the surface or at depth. Therefore, the Project would not impact known paleontological resources; however, surface sediments at and surrounding the Project site consists of Alluvium (Pleistocene) to unknown formations (Pleistocene, sands) (silty fine-grained & massive sandstone). Deep excavation that involves disturbance of native soils could result in the disturbance and/or destruction of paleontological resources that may be present in deeper Pleistocene alluvial deposits that underlie the Project site. Implementation of MM GEO-1 related to paleontological resources would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Program The following mitigation measures are required to reduce impacts to less than significant levels and they will be incorporated into the Mitigation Program for this IS/MND. MM GEO 1 In the event that paleontological resources are inadvertently unearthed during excavation activities, the contractor shall immediately cease all earth-disturbing Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-33 Environmental Evaluation activities within a 100-foot radius of the area of discovery and the contractor shall contact the City immediately. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the find, and in consultation with the City, determine an appropriate course of action. If the paleontological resources are found to be significant, the paleontologist, in consultation with the City, shall determine appropriate actions for exploration and salvage. After the find has been appropriately avoided or mitigated, work in the area may resume. VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Greenhouse Gas Emissions Background Information and Regulatory Conditions Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate (e.g., average temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns) over a period of time. Climate change may result from natural factors, natural processes, and human activities that change the composition of the atmosphere and alter the surface and features of the land. Significant changes in global climate patterns have recently been associated with global warming, which is an average increase in the temperature of the atmosphere near the Earth’s surface; this is attributed to an accumulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the atmosphere. GHGs trap heat in the atmosphere which, in turn, increases the Earth’s surface temperature. Some GHGs occur naturally and are emitted to the atmosphere through natural processes, while others are created and emitted solely through human activities. The emission of GHGs through fossil fuel combustion in conjunction with other human activities appears to be closely associated with global warming. GHGs, as defined under California’s AB 32, include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). General discussions on climate change often include water vapor, atmospheric ozone, and aerosols in the GHG category. Water vapor and atmospheric ozone are not gases that are formed directly in the construction or operation of development projects, nor can they be controlled in these projects. Aerosols are not gases. While these elements have a role in climate change, they are not considered by regulatory bodies, such as CARB, or climate change groups, such as the California Climate Action Registry, as gases to be reported or analyzed for control. Therefore, no further discussion of water vapor, atmospheric ozone, or aerosols is provided. Regulatory Background On June 1, 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order (EO) S-3-05, which calls for a reduction in GHG emissions to the year 2000 level by 2010, to year 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The principal overall State plan and policy adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is Assembly Bill (AB) 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006). AB 32 establishes regulatory, reporting, and market mechanisms to achieve quantifiable reductions in GHG emissions and establishes a cap on statewide GHG emissions. AB 32 recognizes that California is the source of substantial amounts of GHG emissions. The statute states the following: Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-34 Environmental Evaluation environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. In order to avert these consequences, AB 32 establishes a State goal of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020, codifying the goal of EO S-3-05. CARB approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan as required by AB 32 in 2008; this plan is updated every five years as required. The Climate Change Scoping Plan proposes a “comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall carbon GHG emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health” (CARB 2008). The Climate Change Scoping Plan has a range of GHG-reduction actions which include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives, voluntary actions, market- based mechanisms such as a cap-and-trade system, and an AB 32 implementation regulation to fund the program. On February 10, 2014, CARB released the Draft Proposed First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2014). The board approved the final First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan on May 22, 2014. The first update describes California’s progress towards AB 32 goals, stating that “California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as required by AB 32” (CARB 2014). The latest update occurred in January 2017 and incorporates the 40 percent reduction to 1990 emissions levels by 2030. The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, Senate Bill (SB) 375, established a process to coordinate land use planning, regional transportation plans, and funding priorities in order to help California meet the GHG reduction goals established in AB 32. SB 375 required SCAG to incorporate a “sustainable communities strategy” (SCS) into its regional transportation plans (RTPs) that will achieve GHG emission reduction targets though several measures, including land use decisions. SCAG’s SCS is included in Connect SoCal, the SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS (SCAG 2020). The goals and policies of the RTP/SCS that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) focus on transportation and land use planning that include building infill projects; locating residents closer to where they work and play; and designing communities so there is access to high quality transit service. On April 29, 2015, Governor Brown signed EO B-30-15, which ordered an interim statewide GHG emission reduction target to reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 to ensure California meets its target of reducing GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Five key goals for reducing GHG emissions through 2030 include (1) increasing renewable electricity to 50 percent; (2) doubling the energy efficiency savings achieved in existing buildings and making heating fuels cleaner; (3) reducing petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent; (4) reducing emissions of short-lived climate pollutants; and (5) managing farms, rangelands, forests and wetlands to increasingly store carbon. EO B-30-15 also directs CARB to update the Climate Change Scoping Plan to express the 2030 target in terms of million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. On September 8, 2016, the Governor signed Senate Bill 32 (SB 32) to codify the GHG reduction goals of EO B-30-15, requiring the State to reduce GHG emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (Health and Safety Code Section 38566). As stated above, this goal is expected to keep the State on track to meeting the goal set by EO S-3-05 of reducing GHG emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 197 was signed at the same time to ensure that the SB 32 goals are met by requiring CARB to provide annual reports of GHGs, criteria pollutants, and TACs by facility, City and sub-county level, and sector for stationary sources and at the County level for mobile sources. It also requires Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-35 Environmental Evaluation the CARB to prioritize specified emission reduction rules and regulations and to identify specified information for emission reduction measures (e.g., alternative compliance mechanism, market- based compliance mechanism, and potential monetary and nonmonetary incentive) when updating the Scoping Plan. SB 350, signed October 7, 2015, is the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015. SB 350 is the implementation of some of the goals of EO B-30-15. The objectives of SB 350 are as follows: 1. To increase from 33 percent to 50 percent, the procurement of our electricity from renewable sources 2. To double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses of retail customers through energy efficiency and conservation. The text of SB 350 sets a December 31, 2030, target for 50 percent of electricity to be generated from renewable sources. SB 350 also requires the State to double statewide energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas end uses by 2030. Additionally, SB 350 sets requirements for large utilities to develop and submit integrated resources plans (IRPs), which detail how utilities would meet their customers’ resource needs, reduce GHG emissions, and integrate clean energy resources (CEC 2021a). On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed SB 100, the 100 Percent Clean Energy Act of 2018. SB 100 requires renewable energy and zero-carbon resources to supply 100 percent of electric retail sales to end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve state agencies by December 31, 2045. This policy requires the transition to zero-carbon electric systems that do not cause contributions to increase of GHG emissions elsewhere in the western electricity grid (CEC 2021b). SB 100 also creates new standards for the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) goals established by SB 350 in 2015. Specifically, the bill increases required energy from renewable sources for both investor-owned utilities and publicly owned utilities from 50 percent to 60 percent by 2030. Further, on September 10, 2018, Governor Brown also signed California EO B-55-18, which sets a new statewide goal of carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045 and achieve net negative emissions thereafter. EO B-55-18 was added to the existing Statewide targets of reducing GHG emissions, including the targets previously established by Governor Brown of reducing emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (EO B-30-15 and SB 32), and by Governor Schwarzenegger of reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2040 (EO S-3-05). SCAQMD Significance Criteria On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board presented the staff proposal for a tiered threshold approach wherein Tier 1 determines if a project qualifies for an applicable CEQA exemption, Tier 2 determines consistency with GHG reduction plans, and Tier 3 proposes a numerical screening value as a threshold. At their September 28, 2010, meeting, the Working Group suggested a Tier 3 threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year for all land use types (SCAQMD 2010). Tier 4 determines if the project meets performance standards. Tier 4 has three options: Option 1—percent emission reduction target; Option 2—early implementation of applicable measures, and Option 3—sector-based standard. Tier 5 determines mitigation for CEQA offsets. The SCAQMD recommended 3,000 MTCO2e threshold for non-industrial uses is used for this analysis. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-36 Environmental Evaluation The City of Anaheim has not officially adopted any GHG CEQA significance threshold. The City defers to assessment methods and significance thresholds developed by the SCAQMD. This impact analysis evaluates consistency with regulatory programs designed to reduce GHG emissions and that contribute to the achievement of AB 32’s and SB 32’s goals as the primary significance criterion. In addition, this impact analysis also evaluates the Project’s estimated emissions compared to the SCAQMD threshold (as discussed above). Question A: Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. Based on the Project’s construction activities, the principal source of construction-phase GHG emissions would be internal combustion engines of construction equipment, on-road construction vehicles, and workers’ commuting vehicles. GHG emissions from construction activities were calculated with the CalEEMod model and are described above in response to the air quality thresholds. The estimated construction GHG emissions for the Project would be 180 MTCO2e, as shown in Table 12. TABLE 12 ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM CONSTRUCTION Year Emissions (MTCO2e) 2021 59 2022 121 Total 180 MTCO2e: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Notes: Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A. Operational GHG emissions would come primarily from vehicle trips. Other sources of operational GHG emissions would include purchased electricity; water supply and treatment; solid waste disposal; and fossil-fueled landscaping and maintenance equipment. Table 13 shows the annual GHG emissions from Project’s operations. TABLE 13 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT OPERATION Source Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Area <1 Energy 72 Mobile 103 Waste 21 Water 7 Total Operational Emissions 205 MTCO2e/yr: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding variances. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-37 Environmental Evaluation Because impacts from construction activities occur over a relatively short period of time, they contribute a relatively small portion of the overall lifetime project GHG emissions. In addition, GHG emission reduction measures for construction equipment are relatively limited. The SCAQMD recommends that construction emissions be amortized over a 30-year project lifetime so that GHG reduction measures address construction GHG emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies (SCAQMD 2008b). Therefore, construction and operational emissions are combined by amortizing the construction and operations over an assumed 30-year project lifetime. This combination is shown in Table 14 using the Project’s amortized construction and operational emissions. TABLE 14 ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Source Emissions (MTCO2e/yr) Construction (Amortized) 6a Operations (Table 13) 205 Totalb 211 SCAQMD-Recommended Threshold) 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No MTCO2e/yr: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year a Total derived by dividing construction emissions (see Table 12) by 30. b Total annual emissions are the sum of amortized construction emissions and operational emissions. The SCAQMD has proposed, but not adopted, a threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for non- industrial land use projects. As shown, the estimated GHG emissions from the Project would be less than ten percent of the suggested threshold. Therefore, the Project would have less than significant impacts related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. The principal State plan and policy adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions is the AB 32 Scoping Plan. The goals of AB 32 include reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and adapting to climate change. There are a number of GHG reduction plans that have been adopted on the State and regional level. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, known as Connect SoCal, for the six-county region including Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties (SCAG 2020). The RTP/SCS seeks to improve the mobility, sustainability and economies of this region. This Plan demonstrates how the region would reduce transportation emissions to comply with Senate Bill 375 (SB 375). This is achieved by numerous transportation related programs and projects which seek to improve the operational efficiency of the transportation network, promote mass transit and non-automobile forms of transportation, and fulfill the requirements for the SCS to reduce GHG emissions. The City of Anaheim has not adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP), and the SCAQMD has not adopted standards for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD) has also outlined a plan to transition their Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) to clean energy resources and has increased the procurement of renewable resources since 2003 through its Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), approved by City Council and the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 2018 (Anaheim 2021). The IRP established goals such Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-38 Environmental Evaluation as a 50 percent RPS by 2030, which is consistent with the requirements of SB 350, which requires all California electric utilities to increase the use of renewable resources to serve customer load to 50 percent by 2030. Senate Bill (SB) 100, enacted on September 10, 2018, expanded the renewable procurement target from 50 percent to 60 percent by 2030. Anaheim has performed an initial assessment of the new requirement and will incorporate the full-scale portfolio analysis into the next update to the IRP, which is due in 2023. Additionally, APUD prepared a GHG Reduction Plan in 2020 to update the City’s 2015 GHG Reduction Plan and outline new GHG reduction targets (APUD 2020). The 2020 GHG Reduction Plan set targets for 2020, 2030 and 2045, which are consistent with the targets of SB 350 and SB 100 for increased RPS standards. Although APUD’s reduction goals are not directly applicable to the Project, APUD’s GHG reductions would also reduce the Project’s GHG emissions because APUD is the utility provider for the Project. Project related emissions would be substantially less than the SCAQMD-recommended screening threshold, as shown in Table 14, and would result in less than significant impacts. The Project would continue to meet the religious needs of the local community that it serves with additional capacity at the Project site. GHG emissions associated with vehicle travel to Project site is anticipated to continue to be reduced with the increasing adoption of electric vehicle usage in Southern California. As discussed previously, utility related GHG emissions from electricity consumption from the Project would also decrease over time in compliance with SB 350 and SB 100. Electricity related emissions from utilities produced to fuel electric vehicles would likewise decrease. As such, the SCAQMD does not consider the Project to result in a significant quantity of GHG emissions. The Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of State, regional, or local agencies and the impact would be less than significant. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS The information in this section is partly derived from the Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Radius Map Report with GeoCheck that was prepared for the Project by EDR in 2021 (Appendix E). Question A: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would not involve the routine use, transport, handling, or storage of hazardous materials on-site. The proposed land use for the Project is a community church. The Project would result in the on-site handling of materials that are common in similar developments, such as commercial cleansers, solvents, and other janitorial or industrial-use materials; paints; and landscape fertilizers/pesticides. While these common materials are technically labeled as “hazardous”, the presence of such materials is common in most proposed developments and their transport and use is considered a less than significant impact with implementation of RR HAZ-1, which requires compliance with existing federal, State, and local regulations regarding hazardous material use, storage, disposal, and transport. The proposed land use would not generate hazardous emissions, nor would daily church operations involve hazardous materials that would create a hazard to the public or environment. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-39 Environmental Evaluation Question B: Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. Project construction activities routinely involve the use and handling of limited volumes of commonly used hazardous materials, such as petroleum (fuel), paints, adhesives, and solvents. During construction, there is a limited risk of spills and/or accidental release of hazardous materials that are used for the operation and maintenance of construction equipment. The on-site temporary handling, storage, and usage of these materials would be subject to applicable local, State, and/or federal regulations. As required by RR HAZ-1, any hazardous materials used during construction would also be transported, used, stored, and disposed of according to any applicable local, State, and/or federal regulations. The structures within the Project site that would be remodeled, removed, or otherwise altered by the Project were all developed since 1988, when the church was first established. Asbestos- containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP) were generally no longer utilized commonly in building materials after 1978. Therefore, ACMs and LBP are not likely to be present within interior and/or exterior materials and surfaces. With implementation of RR HAZ-1, the Project would have less than significant impacts related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is approximately 0.25-mile from Running Springs Elementary School, which is located southwest of the Project site at 8670 Running Springs Drive. The Project involves the expansion of a community church and does not include any features that would result in hazardous emissions during operation. The Project would not develop land uses that involve the use, storage, or transport of hazardous materials that represent a significant hazard to the public or the environment. During Project operations, the Project would result in the routine on-site handling of materials that are common in similar developments, such as commercial cleansers, solvents, and other janitorial or industrial-use materials; paints; and landscape fertilizers/pesticides. Less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. Section 65962.5 requires the development of a hazardous waste and substances site list, also known as the Cortese List, which provides the location of known hazardous materials release sites. Based on a review of the EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck prepared for the Project site by EDR in 2021, the following facilities were listed adjacent to the site. Search parameters were based on a one-mile radius of the Project site and consisted of a search of federal, State, local, tribal, and other databases. The complete list of databases and additional information regarding the identified sites can be found in Appendix E. The Industrial Asphalt Plant (former) and Owl Rock New Star sites are located at 9010 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is approximately 0.42-mile east of the Project site at a lower elevation. That property’s past uses have resulted in soil contamination with hydrocarbon solvents. The property owner has implemented a voluntary cleanup program on that site. A report of a leaking Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-40 Environmental Evaluation underground storage tank (LUST), which leaked diesel fuel into the soil, also occurred on this property. The Industrial Asphalt Plant/Robertson’s Ready Mix site is separately listed at 24000 Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is 0.31-mile east of the Project site, at a lower elevation relative to the Project site. Soil contamination is recorded at that site from a LUST, including diesel fuel oil and additives, as well as leaded and unleaded gasoline. Also, the Project site is approximately 0.25-mile from Running Springs Elementary School, which is located southwest of the Project site at 8670 Running Springs Drive at a higher elevation that the Project site. Running Springs Elementary School is listed in the EnviroStor database. The records are related to ongoing monitoring of the site that occurred as part of the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP). No contaminants were found as part of these investigations. According to the EDR Radius Map, no hazardous materials sites were identified within the boundaries of the Project site. Of the hazardous materials sites identified in the project vicinity, none of the identified sites pose a hazard to the Project site. No impacts related to known hazardous materials sites would occur, and no mitigation is required. Question E: For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The Project site is not located within an adopted Airport Land Use Plan or in the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport, or helistop. The nearest airport is Corona Municipal Airport located in the City of Corona, approximately 6.75 miles northeast of the Project site. Implementation of the Project would not impact the airport facilities or their operation; no mitigation would be required. Question F: Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The City of Anaheim’s Emergency Operations Plan was adopted by the Anaheim City Council on May 9, 2017 (Anaheim 2017). This plan provides an overview of potential hazards affecting the City, as well as general policy-level guidance related to future development within the City. The Project does not conflict with the Emergency Operations Plan. Furthermore, the Project would not physically affect or interfere with the evacuation routes identified on the City’s “Know Your Way Page”, which provides guidance on developing primary and secondary evacuation routes in case of wildfire, flood, or earthquake events. The “Know Your Way Page” shows westbound East Santa Ana Canyon Road as a major route west connecting evacuees to Weir Canyon Road and ultimately to westbound SR-91 (Anaheim 2021b). The Project site is located along East Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is a primary arterial in the City. Construction activity would be confined to the Project site and would not interfere with vehicle movement or emergency access along the roadway. The Project does not include characteristics that would physically impair or otherwise interfere with emergency response or evacuation in the vicinity of the Project. As detailed in Section XVII, Transportation, any impacts related to increased vehicular traffic resulting from the Project would be less than significant; therefore, the Project would not interfere with the movement of emergency vehicles or those evacuating along local roadways. The Project would not conflict with the City’s Emergency Operations Plan or any other applicable emergency response or evacuation plan, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-41 Environmental Evaluation Question G: Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located entirely within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) as identified in the California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer using data provided by California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE 2021). A Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) is a mapped area that designates zones, based on factors such as fuel, slope, and fire weather, with varying degrees of fire hazard ranging including, moderate, high, and very high. FHSZ maps evaluate wildfire hazards, which are physical conditions that create a likelihood that an area will burn over a 30- to 50-year period. The Project involves the expansion of an existing church within a Project site that has been previously graded and developed. As such, people (e.g., congregants, staff) and structures within the Project site are already susceptible to wildfire risks. The Project would add buildings and additional capacity to the existing church activities, which would result in the potential for more people and structures to be exposed to wildfire risk. According to the Applicant, no existing fuel modification requirements exist for the Project site (e.g., the existing church). However, Chapter 6.16 of the City Municipal Code requires that all property owners across the City abate noxious vegetation on their properties, which applies to vegetation that might pose a wildfire risk. Furthermore, the Project site is located within a Special Protection Area of the City as designated by the Fire Department. The City continues to refine procedures and processes to minimize the risk of fire hazards in the Special Protection Area including: requiring new development to utilize fire-resistant building materials; incorporating fire sprinklers as appropriate; incorporating defensible space requirements; requiring compliance with Anaheim Fire Department Fuel Modification Guidelines; requiring development to use plant materials that are compatible with surrounding natural vegetation; and providing wet or irrigated zones when required. With implementation of City requirements related to weed abatement as well as the provision of fire sprinklers on all new and relocated structures, less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program Regulatory Requirement RR HAZ-1 Activities at the Project site shall comply with existing federal, State, and local regulations regarding hazardous material use, storage, disposal, and transport to prevent Project-related risks to public health and safety. All on-site generated waste that meets hazardous waste criteria shall be stored, manifested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22) and in a manner to the satisfaction of the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), as applicable. Any hazardous materials removed from the Project site shall be transported only by a Licensed Hazardous Waste Hauler, who shall be in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act) and Title 40, Section 263 (Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) of the Code of Federal Regulations; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards; and Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) standards. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-42 Environmental Evaluation X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Question A: Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. This section discusses the Project’s potential construction- and operational-related water quality impacts. Construction-Related Water Quality Impacts The Project could result in short-term construction impacts to surface water quality from demolition, grading, and other construction-related activities. Stormwater runoff from the Project site during construction could contain soils and sediments from these activities. Also, spills or leaks from heavy equipment and machinery, construction staging areas, and/or building sites can also enter runoff and typically include petroleum products such as fuel, oil and grease, and heavy metals. The SWRCB has issued the Statewide NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with the Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No 2012-0006-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002, adopted by the SWRCB on July 17, 2012). Under this Construction General Permit, individual NPDES permits or Construction General Permit coverage must be obtained for discharges of stormwater from construction sites with a disturbed area of one or more acres. Since the Project site is 14.79-acres, coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity is required. To obtain coverage, the Developer must retain the services of a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer to prepare a SWPPP for the Project. The Developer, or the contractor if specifically delegated, would electronically submit permit registration documents prior to beginning construction activities in the Storm Water Multi-Application Report Tracking System, which would consist of a Notice of Initiation, Risk Assessment, Post-Construction Calculations, a site map, the SWPPP, a signed certification statement, and the first annual fee. Project construction would also adhere to the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 402 (Nuisance) and Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) to avoid and minimize dust from leaving the site. Construction activities are not anticipated to directly encounter groundwater, as levels are anticipated to be more than 18.5 feet below ground surface at the Project site (Anacal Engineering 2021), which is well below the depth of proposed excavation. Adherence to applicable regulatory requirements would ensure that Project short-term impacts to surface water quality during construction would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Operational Water Quality Impacts The Project is located in the Santa Ana River Basin. Specifically, the Project Site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing City storm drain, which traverses the Project site and flows north to the Santa Ana River. The SWRCB maintains the 303(d) List of Impaired Water Bodies, which identifies water bodies where water quality indicators exceed acceptable thresholds. The Project site drains directly to the Santa Ana River, which is a 303(d)-listed impaired water body for indicator bacteria (Anacal Engineering 2021). The Santa Ana RWQCB develops and implements total maximum daily loads to address water quality impairments and help achieve water quality standards. Water quality is also governed through NPDES stormwater Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-43 Environmental Evaluation discharge permits issued to municipalities, construction sites, and industrial facilities to control non-point-source pollutants in stormwater discharges to surface waters. According to the PWQMP that was prepared for the Project, general pollutants that may result from Project operations, which are also known as project priority pollutants of concern, include suspended solids/sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens (bacteria/virus), pesticides, oil and grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris (Anacal Engineering 2021). In the existing condition, the majority of the Project site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing City storm drain that traverses the Project site, which was constructed to serve the adjacent residential development to the south. Instead, the Project would redirect stormwater flows from throughout the Project site to a new 18-inch RCP. The RCP would collect and convey flows downslope to an underground infiltration system, which would consist of two underground stormwater infiltration chambers within a portion of APN 354-321-03. In the event of stormwater exceeding the design capture volume for the underground infiltration chamber, excess water would be rerouted to the existing City storm drain via an 18-inch RCP overflow pipe. Prior to flowing into the 18-inch RCP, at least 50 percent of stormwater would be pre-treated for sediment, debris, and hydrocarbons using Filterra stormwater biofiltration units. Catch basins would be installed with FloGard filters to capture trash and debris. These improvements are depicted in Exhibit 17, Water Quality Best Management Practices, and described in more detail in the Project’s PWQMP (Anacal Engineering 2021). These drainage improvements have been incorporated into the Project design based on the recommendations of the PWQMP to minimize impacts related to stormwater quality and increased stormwater volumes generated from Project implementation. Therefore, construction and operation of these basins would adequately treat stormwater runoff and a less than significant impact would occur; no mitigation would be required. Question B: Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is currently served by two wells, which would continue to provide water for the Project. The Project would result in a minor increase in demand for groundwater above what is currently required for the existing church; however, this increase in demand would not be substantial relative to the overall capacity of the Orange County Groundwater Basin (OCWD 2015). Additionally, the Project would not interfere substantially with groundwater recharge as the Project has incorporated stormwater infiltration as required in the PWQMP, which would minimize impacts related to the Project’s minor increases in impervious surface coverage compared to pre-Project conditions (Anacal Engineering 2021). Therefore, the Project would have less than significant impacts related to groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. As described above in response to threshold X(a), the Project has the potential to result in erosion and siltation during construction. Development and implementation of a SWPPP for the Project would ensure potential effects related to erosion and siltation are reduced to less than significant levels during construction. Also, as discussed above under threshold X(a), appropriate drainage and stormwater improvements have been incorporated into the Project’s design, which would reduce potential for erosion and siltation Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-44 Environmental Evaluation during Project operations. Given these considerations, less than significant impacts would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would result in an increase of impervious surface coverage within the Project site of approximately 16.4 percent or 42,579 square feet (Anacal Engineering 2021). The addition of impervious surface has the potential to permanently increase appropriate drainage and stormwater improvements have been incorporated in the Project’s design which would convey, retain, and treat stormwater prior to it being conveyed off-site along natural drainage courses that exist in the pre-Project condition. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result related to these thresholds, and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? Less Than Significant Impact. According to a review of the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) Viewer maintained by FEMA, the Project site is located within FIRM Panel 06059C0180J. The entire Project site is outside the active 100- and 500-year floodplains. Also, the Project site is not located within the dam inundation zones established downslope of the Prado Dam, Carbon Canyon Dam, or Walnut Canyon Reservoir (Anaheim 2020a). The Project would provide drainage improvements to receive, convey, detain, and treat stormwater within the Project site consistent with the Project’s PWQMP (Anacal Engineering 2021). Therefore, the Project would provide adequate drainage and conveyance within the site and impacts to flood flows would be less than significant; no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less Than Significant Impact. As noted above in response to threshold X(c)(iv), the Project site is not within an active floodplain; therefore, there would be minimal risk of on- or off-site flooding that would result from the Project. The Project is not near the ocean or other water body with the potential to be at risk of seismically-induced tidal phenomena. Furthermore, the Project would not utilize, store, or otherwise contain pollutants that would be at risk of release if inundated. Therefore, hazards related to the potential release of pollutants due to inundation caused by a flood, tsunami, and/or seiche are considered to be negligible. A less than significant impact would result from the Project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-45 Environmental Evaluation Question E: Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Santa Ana RWQCB prepares and maintains the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (Basin Plan). The Basin Plan sets water quality standards in the Santa Ana River Basin by establishing beneficial uses for specific water bodies and designating numerical and narrative water quality objectives. The Basin Plan sets water quality objectives for the Project site and its surrounding areas. Water quality thresholds identified in the Basin Plan are intended to reduce pollutant discharge and ensure that water bodies are of sufficient quality to meet their designated beneficial uses. The Project would not conflict with the water quality standards outlined in the Basin Plan or worsen water quality conditions in any 303(d)-listed water body. As discussed above in response to threshold X(a), pollutant discharge during construction would be avoided through compliance with the Construction General Permit including the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP. Once the Project is constructed, the Project would consist of an expanded community church. Pollutants generated during Project operations would be treated using the best management practices identified in the Project’s PWQMP. Therefore, the Project would not be a source of pollutants for downstream water bodies and the Project would thereby not conflict with the Basin Plan. The Orange County Water District (OCWD) has adopted a Groundwater Management Plan for the sustainable management of the Orange County Groundwater basin (OCWD 2015). The Project would not interfere with any of the water supply monitoring efforts or infiltration areas outlined in the Groundwater Management Plan, nor would the Project impact any of the recharge facilities, groundwater replenishment processes, or seawater intrusion and barrier management activities that are listed in the plan. Therefore, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING Question A: Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. As shown in the aerial photograph provided as Exhibit 2, the Project site is currently developed with a church, which is physically isolated from other nearby development. The only public access point to the Project site is in the north at the property line with East Santa Ana Canyon Road. The Project would expand the existing church facilities. No impact would occur related to physically dividing an established community, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact. Kindred Community Church is currently located on the Project site, and the Project consists of the expansion of this existing use. The majority of the property is located within the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) Zone; however, a small portion (approximately two acres) is located within The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) Zone. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-46 Environmental Evaluation The Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1) identifies the Project site as a future church with an underlying Open Space land use; however, SP88-1 does not include any detailed standards or procedures for the development of the church. SP88-1 includes a brief discussion that an 11- acre church is planned in the northeast portion of the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan area. SP88- 1 notes that the details of the proposed church would be addressed in a subsequent application (Anaheim 1988a). SP88-1 states that the standards of the Open Space Zone in Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special Purpose Zones) of the City’s Municipal Code shall apply for the areas shown as open space on the Sycamore Canyon Development Plan Map, such as the Project site. Pursuant to Chapter 18.14 of the City’s Municipal Code, the existing church and proposed expansion of the church under the Project would be conditionally permitted uses. In addition to the City-wide sign requirements codified in Chapter 18.44 of the City’s Municipal Code, SP88-1 also includes requirements for signage in the Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan in Section 18.102.150 of the Municipal Code. These requirements have been incorporated into the relocated monument signage, which will be reviewed and approved by the City as part of a future and separate discretionary action. The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2) similarly identifies the Project site as a future church with an underlying Open Space land use in mapping but does not include any detailed standards or procedures for the development of the church (Anaheim 1988b). As outlined in the Open Space Standards for the Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan, which are codified at Section 18.104.080 of the City’s Municipal Code, the existing church and proposed expansion of the church under the Project are conditionally permitted uses. SP88-2 includes additional requirements for signage; however, none of the Project signage would occur within any parcels zoned as SP88-2, so these policies are not applicable. The City originally approved a CUP for the church in 1988 as a semi-enclosed “garden church” by CUP 3032. In 1998, the City subsequently approved the existing church by CUP 4033. This CUP permitted a 29,503-square foot church with accessory day care center, fellowship hall, and multi-purpose building in conjunction with existing modular buildings. The City subsequently amended the CUP in 1998 to add a parsonage home; in 2004 to allow 5,611 addition to the fellowship hall; and, in 2008 to add three modular units for Sunday school classrooms. The entire property is within the SC Overlay Zone, and the Project has been designed to be consistent with the requirements for this zone. As part of the City’s design review process and amendment to the CUP for the Project site, the Project has been reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with applicable plans, policies, and regulations. Given that the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-47 Environmental Evaluation XII. MINERAL RESOURCES Question A: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Question B: Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. The CGS provides information about California’s non-fuel mineral resources. The primary focus of the Mineral Resources Project administered by CGS is to classify lands throughout the State that contain regionally significant mineral resources as mandated by State law. According to the CGS, the Project site is not located within a Mineral Resource Zone or within any areas of the City identified as containing mineral resources of regional significance. The Project consists of the redevelopment of an existing church property, which has no substantial value to the State or region as a source of mineral resources. Therefore, development of the Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan as there are no known mineral resources or mineral resource recovery sites within the Project site. No related impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-48 Environmental Evaluation XIII. NOISE Noise Background Information and Regulatory Conditions Noise is typically defined as unwanted sound and is described in terms of a sound’s intensity or loudness, pitch, and duration. The ambient noise environment is comprised of stationary and mobile noise sources. Stationary noise sources occur in a single location and may be constant or short-term in nature; mobile noise sources are typically transportation-related and are generally not considered a constant noise source. The physical measure of sound, or sound level, is measured in decibels (dB), which are based on a logarithmic scale. Therefore, a doubling of the energy of a noise source, such as doubling of traffic volume, would increase the noise level by 3 dB; a halving of the energy would result in a 3 dB decrease. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud). The A-weighted decibel scale relates noise to human sensitivity. Common noise levels are measured in terms of the “A-weighted decibel”, abbreviated dBA. Table 15 provides examples of various noises and their typical A-weighted noise level. TABLE 15 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities 110 Rock Band Jet fly-over at 300 m (1,000 ft) 100 Gas Lawn Mower at 1 m (3 ft) 90 Diesel Truck at 15 m (50 ft), at 80 km/hr (50 mph) 80 Food Blender at 1 m (3 ft) Noisy Urban Area, Daytime Gas Lawn Mower at 30 m (100 ft) 70 Vacuum Cleaner at 3 m (10 ft) Commercial Area Heavy Traffic at 90 m (300 ft) 60 Normal speech at 1 m (3 ft) Quiet Urban Daytime 50 Large Business Office Dishwasher in Next Room Quiet Urban Nighttime 40 Theater, Large Conference Room Quiet Suburban Nighttime 30 Library Quiet Rural Nighttime 20 Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall 10 Broadcast/Recording Studio Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing 0 Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing dBA: A-weighted decibels; m: meter; km/hr: kilometers per hour; ft: feet; mph: miles per hour Source: Caltrans 2009. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-49 Environmental Evaluation Although human perception of sound is somewhat subjective, it is widely accepted that the average healthy ear (1) can barely perceive an increase or decrease of 3 dBA; (2) can perceive a change of 3 dBA in outdoor environments; and (3) can notice that an increase of 10 dBA sounds twice as loud. Noise, or sound over a period of time, can be measured using a number of methods. The two most common methods are the community noise equivalent (CNEL) and the equivalent sound level (Leq). The average noise levels over a period of minutes or hours is expressed as dBA Leq. Leq can be measured for any time period. The CNEL scale represents the average of 24 hourly noise measurements and adjusts or penalizes the dBA during certain sensitive time periods to account for increased noise sensitivity during the evening and nighttime periods. The evening time period (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM) penalizes noises by 5 dBA, while nighttime (10:00 PM to 7:00 AM) noises are penalized by 10 dBA. Regulatory Setting State of California Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also known as the California Building Standards Code, establishes building standards applicable to all occupancies throughout the State (CBSC 2019). Section 1207.11.2 requires that residential structures, other than detached single-family dwellings, be designed to prevent the intrusion of exterior noise so that the interior noise attributable to exterior sources shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL in any habitable room. This requirement is most applicable to the expanded community church use. Section 1207.12 states, “if interior allowable noise levels are met by requiring that windows be unopenable or closed, the design for the structure must also specify a ventilation or air-conditioning system to provide a habitable interior requirement. The ventilation system must not compromise the dwelling unit or guest room noise reduction.” City of Anaheim The following sections of the City of Anaheim’s Municipal Code apply to the Project: 6.70.010 ESTABLISHED. Sound produced in excess of the sound pressure levels permitted herein are hereby determined to be objectionable and constitute an infringement upon the right and quiet enjoyment of property in this City. No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response. The sound level measuring microphone shall be placed at any point on the property line, but not closer than three (3) feet from any wall and not less than three (3) feet above the ground, where the above listed maximum sound pressure level shall apply. At any point the measured level shall be the average of not less than three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the sources of the alleged objectionable sound are not operating. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-50 Environmental Evaluation Sound pressure levels shall be measured with a sound level meter manufactured according to American Standard S1.4-1961 published by the American Standards Association, Inc., New York City, New York. Traffic sounds sound created by emergency activities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official. (Ord. 2526 § 1 (part); June 18, 1968; Ord. 3400 § 1; February 11, 1975: Ord. 6020 § 1; April 25, 2006.) 6.72.010 PURPOSE. This City Council enacts this legislation for the sole purpose of securing and promoting the public health, comfort, safety, and welfare of its citizenry. While recognizing that certain uses of sound-amplifying equipment are protected by the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and assembly, the City Council, nevertheless, feels obligated to reasonably regulate the use of sound-amplifying equipment in order to protect the correlative constitutional rights of the citizens of this community to privacy and freedom from public nuisance of loud and raucous noise (Ord. 4059 § 1 (part); October 9, 1979; Ord. 5941 § 1 (part); September 14, 2004.) 6.72.020 REGULATION OF AMPLIFIED SOUND. Notwithstanding the provisions of Chapter 6.70 of this code, it shall be unlawful for any person to use or operate, or cause to be used or operated, within the City of Anaheim any sound-amplifying equipment in a fixed or movable position, or mounted upon any vehicle, except when used or operated in compliance with the following provisions: .010 In all residential zones and within two hundred feet of any boundary thereof, no sound-amplifying equipment shall be operated or used for commercial purposes, except sound-amplifying equipment may be used for commercial purposes upon a moving vehicle between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to announce the presence of such vehicle in an area or location for commercial purposes; provided that such sound-amplifying equipment shall not be used during periods that the vehicle is stopped, parked or otherwise in a stationary position.. .020 In all residential zones and within two hundred feet of any boundary thereof, no sound-amplifying equipment shall be operated or used for noncommercial purposes between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of the following day. .030 In all non-residential zones, except such portions thereof as may be included within two hundred feet of the boundary of any residential zone, the operation or use of sound-amplifying equipment for commercial purposes is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. of the following day. .040 In all non-residential zones, except such portions thereof as may be included within two hundred feet of the boundary of any residential zone, the operation or use of sound-amplifying equipment for noncommercial purposes is prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of the following day. .050 Sound emanating from sound-amplifying equipment shall not be audible to a person of normal hearing acuity within an enclosed building (other than a building within Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-51 Environmental Evaluation which the sound emanate) at a distance in excess of two hundred feet from the sound- amplifying equipment. .060 In no event shall the sound-amplifying equipment be unreasonably loud, raucous, jarring or disturbing to a person of normal sensitiveness within the area of audibility, or disturb the peace or quiet of any neighborhood. .070 It shall be unlawful for any person to operate or use any sound-amplifying equipment within, upon or adjacent to the premises of any hospital, school, or publicly owned or operated arena, stadium, convention center or auditorium, while in use, in a manner which disturbs, disrupts or interferes with the conduct of any event, business or activity of any nature then occurring within such building or premises. Nothing contained in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit any conduct which is otherwise prohibited by California Penal Code Sections 302 or 403, or any other provision of State law. (Ord. 4059 § 1 (part); October 9, 1979; Ord. 5781 § 1; September 25, 2001; Ord. 5941 § 1 (part); September 14, 2004.) 6.73.020 NOISE RESTRICTIONS. It shall be unlawful and constitute a public nuisance for any owner or responsible person to conduct or allow to be conducted any party or similar event from which loud and unreasonable noise originates between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Continuation of any activity prohibited by this section after written notification by a peace officer as provided in Section 6.73.030 that the activity is disturbing the comfort, health, peace, safety, quiet enjoyment or repose of one or more other persons shall be prima facie evidence of willful intent within the meaning of Section 6.73.010.010.(Ord. 5337 § 1 (part); October 20, 1992: Ord. 6259 § 1 (part); November 20, 2012.) In the City of Anaheim General Plan Noise Element, the City adopted land use-noise compatibility standards shown in Table 16. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-52 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 16 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NOISE EXPOSURE Land Use Category Community Noise Exposure Ldn or CNEL, dB 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 Residential – Low-Density Single-Family, Duplex, Mobile Homes Residential – Multiple-Family Homes Transient Lodging - Motels, Hotels Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture Normally Acceptable Conditionally Acceptable Normally Unacceptable Clearly Unacceptable Specified land use is satisfactory based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal, conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements. New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features are included in the design. Conventional construction, but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning, will normally suffice. New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Outdoor areas must be shielded. New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Construction costs to make the indoor environment acceptable would be prohibitive, and the outdoor environment would not be acceptable. Ldn: day-night noise level; CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level; dB: decibels Source: Anaheim 2004 Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-53 Environmental Evaluation The Noise Element, Goal 1.1, includes the following policies applicable to the Project: 4) Require mitigation where sensitive uses are to be placed along transportation routes to ensure that noise levels are minimized through appropriate means of mitigation, thereby maintaining quality of life standards. 7) Require that site-specific noise studies be conducted by a qualified acoustic consultant utilizing acceptable methodologies while reviewing the development of sensitive land uses or development that has the potential to impact sensitive land uses. Existing Noise Levels The existing noise environment in and near the Project site is primarily influenced by traffic noise on SR-91 and to a much lesser extent from East Santa Ana Canyon Road. Psomas conducted ambient noise monitoring at the Project site on March 11, 2021. Noise level measurements were taken using a Larson Davis Laboratories SoundTrack LxT sound level meter (LD LxT). These noise measurements were located proximate to each of the Project site’s property lines, approximately 5 feet above the ground. Exhibit 18, Noise Monitoring Locations, shows the noise monitoring locations relative to the Project site boundaries. The noise level measurements were collected at each of the Project site boundaries. The energy average (Leq), maximum noise level (Lmax), and minimum noise level (Lmin) values taken at each ambient noise measurement location are shown in Table 17 below. TABLE 17 MONITORED NOISE LEVELS Noise Monitoring Locations Minimum Leq (Average) Maximum Location 1 (near south property line) 52.1 55.8 59.5 Location 2 (near west property line) 54.7 61.6 67.6 Location 3 (near east property line) 57.1 60.8 64.8 Location 4 (near north property line and SR-91) 72.1 77.6 80.7 Source: Psomas 2021. Impact Analysis Question A: Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Long-term (Permanent) Impacts Impacts to Off-Site Land Uses Less Than Significant Impact. Daily operation of the Project has the potential to result in an increased ambient noise level in the vicinity of the Project through the addition of stationary sources of noise as well as vehicular trips associated with the Project. Stationary sources of noise include heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) noise from the four new modular structures and the renovations to the auditorium. Noise associated with HVAC usage is required to comply with Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, which limits noise levels to 60 dBA Leq at the Project’s property line. Compliance with the noise limits within the Municipal Code would result in noise Noise Monitoring Locations Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Exhibit 18 (Rev: 01/05/2022 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\ISMND\ex_Noise_Monitoringl.pdf ParkingLot 1 ParkingLot 2 ParkingLot 3 ParkingLot 4 ParkingLot 5 Santa Ana Canyon Rd EWindso n g Dr C e d a r P o i n t Dr CrownviewWay G a rd e n V ie w D rE F o x h o l l o w Dr UV91 Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\ex_Aerial_20210505.mxd300 0 300150 Feet² Aerial Source: Esri, Maxar 2020 Project Boundary Off-site Stormwater Improvements Noise Monitoring Location Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-54 Environmental Evaluation levels that are acceptable to the City and would result in less than significant impacts related to these stationary sources of noise. The Project would generate 80 daily trips and 272 Sunday trips6 (AGA 2021). Vehicle trips generated at the Project site would have access along East Santa Ana Canyon Road which is adjacent to the SR-91 and SR-241 interchange. East Santa Ana Canyon Road has traffic volumes of approximately 4,900 trips per day (Anaheim 2008). The addition of up to 272 daily trips from the Project to 4,900 trips per day along East Santa Ana Canyon Road would not result in a perceptible change in noise levels. A doubling of traffic results in a 3 dBA increase in noise levels. Because the Project would only increase traffic volumes by 6 percent from existing conditions, less than a 1 dB change in noise levels would occur. As such, Project-related traffic noise increases would be below the 3 dBA noise increase threshold and would not be perceptible or substantial. The impact on traffic noise levels would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Short-Term Construction Impacts Less Than Significant Impact. Short-term construction noise would be generated on-site by construction equipment during demolition, excavation, site preparation, and building construction activities. The degree to which noise-sensitive receptors are affected by construction activities depends heavily on their proximity. Estimated noise levels that would result from Project construction are shown in Table 18. Construction noise calculations are provided in Appendix G. TABLE 18 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT NOISE-SENSITIVE USES Construction Phase Noise Levels (Leq dBA) Recreational Vehicle Park North of Project Site Residential Uses South of Project Site Residential Uses West of Project Site Max (380 ft) Avg (1,040 ft) Max (240 ft) Avg (680 ft) Max (700 ft) Avg (1,260 ft) Ground Clearing/Demolition 65 57 69 60 60 55 Excavation 53 45 57 48 48 43 Foundation Construction 59 51 63 54 54 49 Building Construction 54 46 58 49 49 44 Paving and Site Cleanup 56 48 60 51 51 46 Leq dBA: Average noise energy level; Max: maximum; avg: average; ft: feet Note: Noise levels from construction activities do not take into account attenuation provided by intervening structures. Source: USEPA 1971. Table 18 shows both the maximum average and typical average noise levels. Maximum noise levels represent the noise levels from construction occurring near the property boundary closest to the noise sensitive use/receptor. Average noise levels represent the noise exposure to sensitive uses based on the distance to the center of all components of the Project. For the closest off-site land use to the Project site, noise levels from general construction activities related to the Project would range from 57 to 69 dBA Leq for the maximum noise levels when construction activities are occurring at the closest point to off-site receptors and 48 to 60 dBA Leq for the average noise levels when construction activities are occurring at the center of the Project site. 6 The Trip Generation Memorandum analyzed trip generation for the Project using two methods. The higher trip generation estimate is presented and analyzed in this section to provide a worst-case scenario for the purposes of operational noise impacts. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-55 Environmental Evaluation As per Municipal Code Section 6.70.010, the City exempts construction noise that occurs between 7 AM and 7 PM. Short-term construction noise also would be generated on local roadways by workers commuting to and from the job site and delivering construction materials. It is estimated that a maximum of approximately 54 worker trips, 21 vendor trips, and 10 haul truck trips would occur on a daily basis. Existing traffic volumes along East Santa Ana Canyon Road are approximately 4,900 average daily trips. The increase in volume of traffic and change in vehicular mix would result in less than 1 dBA increase in noise levels along East Santa Ana Canyon Road due to the infrequent and low volume of Project-related traffic. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Because construction would only occur during the least noise sensitive portion of the day (daytime hours), and would represent a short-term, temporary impact, the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. Question B: Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Groundborne vibration, expressed as peak particle velocity (ppv), consists of oscillatory waves that propagate from the source through the ground to adjacent structures. Vibration of building components can also take the form of an audible, low-frequency rumbling noise, which is referred to as groundborne noise. Vibration energy spreads out as it travels through the ground, causing the vibration level to decrease with the distance from the source. Groundborne vibration and noise can be generated during construction activities and is generally highest during impact pile driving, blasting, and demolition-related activities. The Project would require some minimal demolition-related activities. Because the City does not have regulatory standards for construction or operational vibration sources, thresholds for potential structural damage and human annoyance associated with vibration are based on the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) vibration limits. For purposes of this analysis, a threshold of 0.9 ppv is used as the threshold of significance related to human perception because this level of vibration represents a level that is strongly perceptible. A vibration level of 0.3 ppv is used for residential and commercial buildings, respectively, as the threshold of significance for structural damage, as this is the point at which continuous or frequent vibrations would begin to damage buildings. Table 19 summarizes typical vibration levels measured during construction activities for various vibration-inducing pieces of equipment at a distance of 25 feet. TABLE 19 VIBRATION LEVELS PER CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment ppv at 25 ft (in/sec) Vibratory roller 0.210 Caisson drill 0.089 Large bulldozer 0.089 Small bulldozer 0.003 Jackhammer 0.035 Loaded trucks 0.076 ppv: peak particle velocity; ft: feet; in/sec: inches per second. Source: FTA 2018. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-56 Environmental Evaluation As shown in Table 20, vibration decibel levels would not exceed the criteria threshold under maximum conditions when activities are closest to affected uses. As such, vibration generated by the Project’s construction equipment would not result in a significant impact related to vibration induced annoyance prior to mitigation. TABLE 20 VIBRATION ANNOYANCE CRITERIA AT SENSITIVE USES Equipment Vibration Level (ppv) Recreational Vehicle Park North of Project Site Residential Uses South of Project Site Residential Uses West of Project Site (ppv @ 380 ft) (ppv @ 240 ft) (ppv @ 700 ft) Vibratory Roller 0.00 0.01 0.00 Large bulldozer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Small bulldozer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Jackhammer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Loaded trucks 0.00 0.01 0.00 Criteria 0.9 0.9 0.9 Exceeds Criteria? No No No ppv: peak particle velocity; ft: feet Table 21 shows the ppv levels relative to structural damage to sensitive uses from vibration activities. TABLE 21 BUILDING DAMAGE CRITERIA AT SENSITIVE USES Equipment Vibration Levels (ppv) Recreational Vehicle Park North of Project Site Residential Uses South of Project Site Residential Uses West of Project Site (ppv @ 380 ft) (ppv @ 240 ft) (ppv @ 700 ft) Vibratory Roller 0.00 0.01 0.00 Large bulldozer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Small bulldozer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Jackhammer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Loaded trucks 0.00 0.01 0.00 Criteria 0.3 0.3 0.3 Exceeds Criteria? No No No ppv: peak particle velocity; ft: feet As shown in Table 21, all ppv levels would be below the structural damage threshold at all analyzed locations proximate to the Project site. As such, no building damage is anticipated related to construction activities associated with the Project. The nature of daily operation of a hotel use does not involve activities that would create significant operational vibration impacts. Therefore, there would be no long-term vibration-related impacts, and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-57 Environmental Evaluation Question C: For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan how not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The Project site is not located within an adopted Airport Land Use Plan or in the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport, or helistop. The nearest airport is the Corona Municipal Airport which is approximately 6.75 miles to the northeast of the Project site (Google Earth 2021). Therefore, the Project site would not be subject to excessive noise levels related to aircraft or airport operations from either facility. No impact would occur related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING Question A: Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. As of January 2020, the City of Anaheim has a population estimate of 353,468 persons (DOF 2021). The Project consists of the expansion of an existing church. The Project would not provide additional housing, and the Project does not involve construction of habitable structures; therefore, it would not induce substantial population growth directly. The Project is anticipated to create limited short-term construction jobs. Construction jobs for a Project of this scale would typically be filled by existing residents of the region and would not induce housing demand near the construction site due to the temporary nature of construction jobs. Therefore, the temporary increase in construction jobs would result in an insignificant increase in new jobs when compared to the total existing and projected jobs in the City. Additionally, the temporary construction staff for the Project would not create a significant change in demand for goods and services that may induce business investment, growth, or development in the area. Further, the Project site is currently served by existing roads and utility infrastructure, and no extension of roads or infrastructure is proposed by the Project such that would indirectly induce growth. The Project consists of the expansion of an existing church that would serve existing and planned populations within the City. Thus, the Project would not result in substantial unplanned population growth, directly or indirectly. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. As stated in Section 2.2, Existing Project Site Conditions, the Project site is currently developed with a church. There are no residents that would be displaced by the Project. Furthermore, implementation of the Project would not require the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-58 Environmental Evaluation Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. XV. PUBLIC SERVICES Question A: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire Protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Anaheim Fire Department (Fire Department) is a full- service organization designed to provide essential public safety and emergency services to the community and its visitors. Currently 10 engines, 6 trucks, 2 battalion chiefs, and 2 medic units (assigned to the Disneyland Resort 14 hours per shift) are staffed daily by 67 members from 11 fire stations. A summary of the Fire Protection resources in the City is provided in Table 22. The Fire Department operates a 3-shift system and has established a minimum staffing of 67 suppression personnel per shift, per day, at least 95 percent of the time. This includes 2 battalion chiefs and the personnel assigned, under contract, to the Disneyland Resort. The Fire Department maintains a minimum of 4 firefighters on 13 front-line companies and 3 firefighters on three front-line companies (Young 2021). The Fire Department has adopted and follows the expectations of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), a program used in the United States to coordinate emergency preparedness and incident management among various federal, State, and local agencies (Anaheim 2017). Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-59 Environmental Evaluation TABLE 22 CITY OF ANAHEIM FIRE SERVICES FACILITIES Station Station Address Equipment Downtown Station 1 500 East Broadway Street Paramedic Engine 1, Truck 1, Type-3301 and Ambulance 1, Rehab 1 Brookhurst Station 2 2141 West Crescent Avenue Paramedic Engine 2 and US&R 2 Ambulance 2 Resort Station 3 1717 South Clementine Street Paramedic Engine 3, Truck 3, Type 3-309 Paramedic 3 (Disney), Ambulance 3, and Light Air 3 Orange Station 4 2736 West Orange Avenue Paramedic Engine 4 La Palma Station 5 2540 East La Palma Avenue Paramedic Engine 5 Type 3-305, MMRS 1 and Ambulance 5 Euclid Station 6 1330 South Euclid Street Paramedic Engine 6, Truck 6, Battalion 2, Ambulance 6, and Hazmat 6 Paramedic 6 (Disney) Stadium Station 7 2222 East Ball Road Paramedic Engine 7 Riverdale Station 8 4555 East Riverdale Avenue Battalion 1, Paramedic Engine 8, Truck 8, Type 6-601 and Type 3-308 Anaheim Hills Station 9 6300 East Nohl Ranch Road Paramedic Engine 9, Type 6-602 Water Tender 1 and Ambulance 9 Weir Canyon Station 10 8270 East Monte Vista Road Paramedic Engine Truck 10, Type 3-310 Twila Reid Station 11 3078 West Orange Avenue Paramedic Engine 11 OES Engine 414 and Ambulance 11, OES Type 3-1211 USAR: Urban Search and Rescue; Hazmat: hazardous materials unit Source: Young 2021. Fire stations are strategically located to ensure an efficient demand response to all risk hazards and to maintain recommendations for response times (Anaheim 2004). National response time standards for emergency response requires first engine response within 5 minutes to 90 percent of all incidents and 8 minutes to the remaining 10 percent. The Fire Department also requires a maximum of 10 minutes for truck company response to 100 percent of all incidents (Young 2021). Current response times average 3 minutes and 37 seconds for all calls (Young 2021). The first responding station to the Project site is Weir Canyon Station 10. Additionally, Orange County Fire Authority Station Number 53 is located near the Project site within the City of Yorba Linda. The Project involves the expansion of the existing Kindred Community Church. Based on correspondence with Anaheim Fire and Rescue, the Project would not affect the Fire Department’s ability to maintain acceptable response times. In addition, the Project would not require the construction of new facilities, the expansion of existing facilities, or additional personnel or equipment to maintain acceptable response times (Young 2021). Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Police Protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Law enforcement and crime prevention services are provided by the Anaheim Police Department (APD). Officers operate out of four stations and patrol an area of Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-60 Environmental Evaluation 49.7 square miles, divided into four districts (West, Central, South, and East). The police stations are located as follows: Main Station, located at 425 South Harbor Boulevard; East Station, located at 8201 East Santa Ana Canyon Road; and, West Station, located at 320 South Beach Blvd. Police services provided include patrol, investigations, traffic enforcement, traffic control, vice and narcotics enforcement, airborne patrol, crime suppression, community policing, tourist-oriented policing, and detention facilities. The APD currently employs approximately 385 sworn officers, a support staff of over 195, and a 4-person Reserve Officer Detail. The ratio of sworn police officers is approximately 1.1 officers per 1,000 population. Based on consultation with the APD (Berger 2021), the Project would not generate demand for additional staffing. However, in the future if additional police staff are needed, funding for any new personnel needed to maintain acceptable service levels would come from the City’s General Fund. Property taxes and other fees assessed for the property would contribute to the General Fund revenues. Existing Police Department facilities would be sufficient to serve the additional demand associated with the Project along with the existing demand of the area; therefore, a significant impact would not occur related to the construction of law enforcement facilities and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Schools? No Impact. The Project does not involve the construction of new dwelling units. Therefore, no direct impacts would result from the Project related to schools and services provided by the Orange Unified School District, which provides educational services to residents near the Project site. Development of the Project is not expected to result in the need for additional employees as the Project involves an expansion of an existing use. Therefore, no impacts would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Parks? No Impact. The nearest parks to the Project site are Featherly Regional Park, Ronald Reagan Park, and Sycamore Park. The Project would not result in direct or indirect population growth. Therefore, no additional demand for parks or recreational facilities would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. Question A: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-61 Environmental Evaluation acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Other Public Facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. Other public facilities covered by this threshold include libraries. The Anaheim Public Library system includes a network of seven library branches serving the City of Anaheim and surrounding communities, a Mobile Library (Bookmobile), a book vending machine at the ARTIC transportation center and the Anaheim Heritage Center. The closest library branch to the Project site is the East Anaheim Branch located at 8201 East Santa Ana Canyon Road (Anaheim 2021c). Given the Project would not result in direct or indirect population growth, no impact would result related to this threshold and no mitigation would be required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. XVI. RECREATION Question A: Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Question B: Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. As discussed above in Section XV, Public Services, no direct or indirect increase in demand for City parklands or recreational facilities would result from implementation of the Project because the Project consists of the expansion of an existing church. As such, the Project would not result in direct or indirect population growth. No impact would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-62 Environmental Evaluation XVII. TRANSPORTATION The following responses are partially based on the Trip Generation Memorandum prepared for the Project by AGA Engineers, Inc. in February 2021, which is provided as Appendix H. Responses are also partially based on the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Memorandum prepared for the Project by Elements Architecture in November 2020, which is provided as Appendix I. Question A: Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian? Less than Significant Impact. The Project’s consistency with programs, plans, ordinances, and policies related to the circulation system is evaluated below. General Plan Circulation Element The Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan provides overview information on the City’s transportation system and identifies goals and policies related to circulation (Anaheim 2020a). As discussed in the Trip Generation Memorandum prepared for the Project by AGA Engineers, Inc. in February 2021, the Project would generate a minimal number of new trips and, based on correspondence with the City, a traffic study is not required. The Project would not directly conflict with any of the goals or policies contained in the Circulation Element since the Project does not propose any improvements to East Santa Ana Canyon Road or other public roads, and since the Project would not result in a substantial increase in vehicle trips. The Project would support the City’s achievement of Goal 1.1, Policy 9, which is to: “consider aesthetics, including the provision of appropriate landscaping, in the development of arterial highways”. The Project would include landscaping improvements along the Project site’s frontage with East Santa Ana Canyon that would beautify this portion of the Project site when compared to existing conditions. The Project would also promote the achievement of Goal 8.1 of the Circulation Element, which is to protect and encourage pedestrian travel. Specifically, the Project’s internal pedestrian improvements between the parking areas and worship areas would support achievement of Goal 8.1, Policy 1, which is to “encourage and improve pedestrian facilities that link development to the circulation network and that serve as a transition between other modes of travel.” Furthermore, the Project would not impact any existing transit facilities, such as bus stops, and would not conflict with any transit-related policies from the City’s Circulation Element. Bicycle Master Plan The City’s Bicycle Master Plan was adopted by the City to guide implementation of citywide bicycle facilities, and is intended to improve bicycling safety, comfort, and accessibility (Anaheim 2020c). The Bicycle Master Plan identifies a network of existing and proposed bicycle facilities that will improve multi-modal connectivity and increase bicycle mode share, especially for short trips. The Bicycle Master Plan designates existing Class II bicycle lanes as occurring along East Santa Ana Canyon adjacent to the Project site. The Project does not include any improvements within East Santa Ana Canyon Road and would not otherwise impact existing or proposed bicycle lanes. Conclusion As discussed above, the Project would not conflict with any circulation-related programs, plans, ordinances, or policies. The Project would result in less than significant impacts relative to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-63 Environmental Evaluation Question B: Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA analysis requires an evaluation of project impacts related to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts for various land use projects. In accordance with the project screening methodologies listed in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis dated June 2020, a series of analytical steps for SB 743 compliance should be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the Transportation Department. There are three types of project screening that lead agencies can apply to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment. The project only needs to fulfill one of the screening types below to qualify for screening. The City has determined that the Project meets the criteria of “Type 3: Project Type Screening”, which explicitly includes “community and religious assembly uses”. Furthermore, the Project would redevelop the existing church and would not substantially increase trips to/from the Project site as demonstrated in the Trip Generation Memorandum prepared for the Project. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact related to VMT and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? Less Than Significant Impact. All project circulation improvements have been designed and constructed to City standards; and, therefore, would not result in design hazards The Project involves no improvements to the existing access driveway and minor restriping and reconfiguration of the internal roads and parking lots within the Project site. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project’s internal roadways and parking lots have been designed in accordance with all applicable design and safety standards required by adopted fire codes, safety codes, and building codes established by the City’s Engineering and Fire Departments. The Project would not increase delays on street segments substantially; therefore, the Project would not result in inadequate emergency access, and the Project impact is considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Methodology As discussed in Section V of this IS/MND, the NAHC conducted a SLF search for the project. The search results are negative. Consistent with requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA and AB 52 (required for projects subject to CEQA analyses), the City has sent letters to tribes that have expressed an interest in being consulted regarding Native American resources for the projects being undertaken by City. Letters were sent to interested tribal organizations on March 16, 2021. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-64 Environmental Evaluation IMPACT ANALYSIS Question A: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). No Impact. For purposes of impact analysis, a tribal cultural resource is considered a site, feature, place, cultural landscape, sacred place, or object which is of cultural value to a California Native American Tribe and is either eligible for the CRHR or a local register. As indicated in Section V of this IS/MND, based on a 2021 SCCIC record search results there are no resources on the Project Site that are currently listed on the CRHR. Therefore, the Project would not have an impact on a tribal cultural resource that is listed or eligible for listing on the CRHR or a local register. No significant impacts were identified, and mitigation is not required. Question B: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation. Based on information available through the record searches at the SCCIC and the NAHC, and the long-term past use of the Project site as a church, there is no information available that indicates there are significant tribal resources within the Project area that would be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1. However, as noted above, the City conducted tribal consultation for the Project to determine if any local tribes had additional information or additional concerns regarding the Project’s potential for impacts to tribal cultural resources. Certified letters were sent to tribal organizations on March 16, 2021. The City received two responses from interested tribal representatives, as summarized below: On March 10, 2021, Andy Salas (the Tribal Chair), for the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation: Mr. Salas requested consultation regarding the Project. Consultation between the City and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation was conducted by email and telephone. Consultation between the City and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation was completed on April 7, 2021. On March 11, 2021, Joyce Perry of Belardes/Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation: Belardes requested consultation regarding the Project. Consultation between the City and Belardes/Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation was conducted by email and completed on April 19, 2021. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-65 Environmental Evaluation Consultation between the City and the tribal representatives of both Belardes/Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation, and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation, did not identify tribal cultural resources within the Project site. However, it was identified that this area of Orange County was settled by the ancestors of the Juaneño and Gabrieleno/Tongva and continues to be inhabited by their descendants today. Therefore, there is a potential that undiscovered intact cultural resources, including tribal cultural resources eligible for the CRHR or a local register, may be present below the surface in native sediments. In consultation with the tribes, MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2 have been incorporated as part of the Project, which require Native American monitoring during Project grading and ground disturbance. With implementation of MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2, the Project would have less than significant impacts related to potential tribal cultural resources encountered during Project construction. Mitigation Program The following mitigation measure is required to reduce impacts to less than significant levels and they will be incorporated into the Mitigation Program for this IS/MND. MM TCR-1 Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation- Belardes and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation-Belardes will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-66 Environmental Evaluation and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. MM TCR-2 Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) acceptable to the to the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project site. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or tribal cultural resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological or tribal cultural resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior standards and a Tribal monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Monitor from a recognized California Native American tribe culturally and traditionally affiliated with the area shall coordinate with the City and Project Applicant regarding treatment and curation of these resources. The City and Project Applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation on the disposition and treatment of any Tribal Cultural Resource encountered during all ground disturbing activities. Typically, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5[f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be provided by the Project Applicant. A treatment plan would be prepared for the resources, which would be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and PRC Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-67 Environmental Evaluation interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Question A: Would the project require or result in the construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Question C: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is self-sufficient related to water and wastewater services, as described in more detail below. Water Less Than Significant Impact. Water service is provided to the Project site from two private water wells located within the Project site just south of East Santa Ana Canyon Road. The Project would result in a minor increase in demand for water with the additional structures and landscaping; however, water supplied by the existing wells is expected to be adequate to accommodate these new demands and no new wells are expected to be required. Therefore, impacts related to existing water infrastructure would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Wastewater No Impact. An existing septic tank and leach line system exists within the Project site, which is used to treat and dispose of sewer water that is generated by the existing church. The Project would not require any upgrades to or displacement of the existing system or any new septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal system. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to wastewater and no mitigation is required. Stormwater Less Than Significant Impact. In the existing condition, the majority of the Project site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing City storm drain that traverses the Project site, which was constructed for the adjacent residential development to the south. Instead, the Project would redirect stormwater flows from throughout the Project site to a new 18-inch RCP. The RCP would collect and convey flows downslope to an underground infiltration system, which would consist of two underground stormwater infiltration chambers within a portion of APN 354- 321-03. In the event of stormwater exceeding the design capture volume for the underground infiltration chamber, excess water would be rerouted to the existing City storm drain through an 18-inch RCP overflow pipe. Prior to flowing into the 18-inch RCP, at least 50 percent of stormwater would be pre-treated for sediment, debris, and hydrocarbons using Filterra stormwater biofiltration units. Catch basins would be installed with FloGard filters to capture trash and debris. These improvements are depicted in Exhibit 17 and described in more detail in the Project’s PWQMP (Anacal Engineering 2021). With implementation of drainage improvements that are identified in Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-68 Environmental Evaluation the PWQMP, no additional off-site stormwater improvements would be required. Therefore, the Project’s proposed stormwater improvements would result in less than significant environmental impacts and no mitigation is required. Electricity Less Than Significant Impact. Southern California Edison (SCE) would provide electricity for the Project. SCE’s distribution system consists of aboveground and underground transmission and distribution lines. SCE maintains and operates the transmission and distribution infrastructure necessary to provide electricity to end users throughout its entire service area. SCE provides electricity to approximately 15 million people, 180 cities and communities in 50,000 square miles of service area, encompassing 15 counties in central, coastal and southern California. Electricity can be generated from a combination of natural gas, hydroelectric, nuclear or renewable sources (wind and solar). SCE facilities include hydroelectric, nuclear, and coal power plants. The Project involves minimal expansion of an existing use, which is already served by existing SCE facilities. Given the minimal expansion, less than significant impacts would result from the Project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Natural Gas No Impact. The Project would not require natural gas as all power would be electric. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project related to natural gas, and no mitigation is required. Telecommunication Facilities No Impact. The Project would not require any additional connections to telecommunication facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project related to telecommunication facilities and no mitigation is required. Question B: Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form)? No Impact. Given that the Project site obtains its water from two existing wells that have operated consistently for decades, it is anticipated that there would be sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project, which would consist of minimal expansion of the existing community church land use. Less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would involve demolition of existing structures, relocation and modification of existing structures, and construction of new structures and facilities. These construction activities would result in demolition and construction materials waste that would need to be disposed of at a landfill. Also, the increased capacity of the church that would be facilitated by the Project would result in additional operational waste being generated on the Project site above existing levels. OC Waste & Recycling has indicated that solid waste generated by the Project would go to the Olinda Alpha Landfill located at 1942 North Valencia Avenue in the City of Brea and that adequate capacity is available within the Orange County landfill system to Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-69 Environmental Evaluation serve the Project (Halligan 2021). The County of Orange maintains 15-years of countywide solid waste landfill capacity, as required by AB 939 (Halligan 2021). Therefore, a less than significant impact related to landfill capacity would result from the Project, and no mitigation is required. Question E: Would the project comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. Solid waste practices in California are governed by multiple federal, State, and local agencies that enforce legislation and regulations to ensure that landfill operations minimize impacts to public health and safety and the environment. OC Waste & Recycling is obligated to obtain a Solid Waste Facilities Permit, a Storm Water Discharge Permit, and a permit to construct and operate gas management systems and meet Waste Discharge Requirements. The Local Enforcement Agency, the SCAQMD, and the California Water Resources Control Board enforce landfill regulations related to health, air quality, and water quality, respectively. The Project would not inhibit OC Waste & Recycling’s compliance with the requirements of each of these governing bodies, and no impact would occur. Question F: Would the project result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? Less Than Significant Impact. As noted above, SCE would provide electricity for the Project. The Project involves minimal expansion of an existing use, which is already served by existing SCE facilities. Given the minimal expansion, less than significant impacts would result from the Project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question G: Would the project result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? No Impact. The Project would not require natural gas as all power would be electric. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project related to natural gas and no mitigation is required. Question H: Would the project result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? No Impact. The Project does not involve any uses that would require additional telephone service. Therefore, no impact would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Question I: Would the project result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? No Impact. The Project does not involve any uses that would require additional television service or reception. Therefore, no impact would result related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-70 Environmental Evaluation XX. WILDFIRE If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Question A: Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project site is located entirely within a VHFHSZ as identified in the California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer using data provided by CALFIRE (2021). The Project involves the expansion of an existing church within a Project site that has been previously graded and developed. As such, people (e.g., congregants, staff) and structures within the Project site are already susceptible to wildfire risks. The Project would add buildings and additional capacity to the existing church activities, which would result in the potential for more people and structures to be exposed to wildfire risk. According to the Applicant, no existing fuel modification requirements exist for the Project site (e.g., the existing church). However, Chapter 6.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that all property owners across the City abate noxious vegetation on their properties, which applies to vegetation that might pose a wildfire risk. Furthermore, the Project site is located within a Special Protection Area of the City as designated by the Fire Department. The City continues to refine procedures and processes to minimize the risk of fire hazards in the Special Protection Area including: requiring new development to utilize fire-resistant building materials; incorporating fire sprinklers as appropriate; incorporating enhanced defensible space requirements (20 feet brush clearance to the identified fire access roadway); requiring compliance with Fire Department Fuel Modification Guidelines; requiring development to use plant materials that are compatible with surrounding natural vegetation; and providing wet or irrigated zones when required. With implementation of City requirements related to weed abatement as well as the provision of fire sprinklers on all new and relocated structures, less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. The City of Anaheim’s Emergency Operations Plan was adopted by the Anaheim City Council on May 9, 2017 (Anaheim 2017). This plan provides overview information hazards affecting the City, as well as general policy-level guidance related to future development within the City. The Project does not conflict with the Emergency Operations Plan. Furthermore, the Project would not physically affect or interfere with the evacuation routes identified on the City’s “Know Your Way Page”, which provides guidance on developing primary and secondary evacuation routes in case of wildfire, flood, or earthquake events. The “Know Your Way Page” shows westbound East Santa Ana Canyon Road as a major route west connecting evacuees to Weir Canyon Road and ultimately to westbound SR-91 (Anaheim 2021b). The Project site is located along East Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is a primary arterial in the City of Anaheim. Construction activity would be confined to the Project site and would not interfere with vehicle movement or emergency access along the roadway. The Project does not include characteristics that would physically impair or otherwise interfere with emergency response or evacuation in the vicinity of the Project. As detailed in Section XVII, Transportation, any impacts related to increased vehicular traffic resulting from the Project would be less than significant; therefore, the Project would not interfere with the movement of emergency vehicles or those evacuating along local roadways. The Project would not conflict with the City’s Emergency Operations Plan or any other applicable emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore, no impact would occur related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-71 Environmental Evaluation Question B: Would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would result in additional visitors/congregants on- site at times and additional structures on a Project site that is located in an area susceptible to wildfires due to vegetation, topography, and Santa Ana wind patterns. However, it is anticipated that Project users would evacuate from the Project site during a wildfire event and would thereby not be exposed to pollutant concentrations or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire. Furthermore, the Fire Department will review the Project’s plans as part of the City’s design review process to ensure that emergency access to the site and surrounding areas would be maintained in compliance with applicable City requirements. Less than significant impacts would result related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Question C: Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. The Project would not be required to install or maintain any roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities or infrastructure that would have the potential to exacerbate fire risk or that would result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Question D: Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post- fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would result in additional visitors/congregants on- site at times and additional structures on a Project site that is located in an area susceptible to wildfires. The Project site is located upslope of East Santa Ana Canyon Road and SR-91, which are both north of the Project site. The Project is not anticipated to result in any additional off-site flooding given that the Project consists of the redevelopment of an existing church campus. Therefore, much of the existing vegetation on the Project site would be retained, and drainage improvements are proposed that would capture and infiltrate much of the stormwater that occurs on the Project site. Also, as discussed under threshold VII(A)(iv) in the Geology and Soils section, the Project is not anticipated to result in any significant impacts related to landslides since only a minimal amount of grading is proposed and because the Project site is not susceptible to landslides. Therefore, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Program No mitigation is required. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 5-72 Environmental Evaluation XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Question A: Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The Project would result in significant impacts related to biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, and tribal cultural resources. During construction, the Project has the potential to indirectly impact nesting birds. Potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels by implementing MM BIO-1, which requires a pre-construction nesting bird survey and avoidance of active nests. Also, there is potential for impacts to bats during tree and vegetation removal. Therefore, MM BIO-2 has been incorporated in the Project, which requires avoidance of vegetation removal during the bat maternity season, a pre-construction bat survey, and the avoidance of bat roosts during the maternity season. There is the possibility that undiscovered intact archaeological resources may be present below the surface in native (alluvial) sediments. These potential effects would be mitigated to a less than significant level with the implementation of MM CUL-1, which requires archaeological monitoring when excavations are required in native sediment. Also, deep excavation that involves disturbance of native soils could result in the disturbance and/or destruction of paleontological resources that may be present in deeper Pleistocene alluvial deposits that underlie the Project Site. Implementation of MM GEO-1 related to paleontological resources would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. There is a possibility that undiscovered intact cultural resources, including tribal cultural resources eligible for the CRHR or a local register, may be present below the surface in native sediments. TCR-1 and MM TCR-2 have been incorporated as part of the Project. MM TCR-1 and MM TCR-2 require Native American monitoring during Project grading and ground disturbance. Question B: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would not have adverse environmental impacts at a significant level for any resource topics. All potential significant impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures. No significant cumulative effects are anticipated because no resources would be adversely affected by the Project, or the Project effects would be localized and of limited extent. A less than significant impact would occur in relation to cumulatively considerable effects. Question C: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in more detail in the sections above, the Project would result in less than significant impacts related to air quality, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and public services. Therefore, the Project would not cause significant adverse effects to human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Project would result in less than significant impacts related to this threshold. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 6-1 Preparers SECTION 6.0 PREPARERS City of Anaheim, Planning and Building Department Associate Planner ............................................................................................ Andy T. Uk Psomas Senior Project Manager .............................................................................. Jennifer Marks Project Manager .................................................................................. Sean Noonan, AICP Environmental Planner .................................................................................... Janet Powell Air Quality/Noise/Greenhouse Gas Analyses .................................................. Tin Cheung Biological Resources ...................................................................................... Steve Norton Cultural/Paleontological Resources Analyses ......................................... Charles Cisneros GIS/Graphics .................................................................................................... Mike Deseo Word Processor ............................................................................................. Sheryl Kristal Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 6-2 Preparers This page is intentionally left blank Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 7-1 References SECTION 7.0 REFERENCES AGA Engineers, Inc. 2021 (February). Trip Generation Evaluation for the Kindred Community Church Improvement Project. Fullerton, CA: AGA. Anacal Engineering Co. 2021 (December 21). Preliminary City of Anaheim Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP). Anaheim, CA: Anacal Engineering. Anaheim, City of. 2021a (April 5, date accessed). Municipal Code. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/anaheim/latest/overview. ———.2021b (March 25, date accessed). Integrated Resource Plan. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim.. https://www.anaheim.net/4864/Integrated-Resource-Plan. ———. 2020a (September, last updated). City of Anaheim General Plan. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. http://www.anaheim.net/712/General-Plan. ———. 2020b (June). City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/32774/City-of-Anaheim-TIA-Guidelines- for-CEQA-Analysis-62020. ———. 2020c (July 17, date amended). Bicycle Master Plan. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/33379/2020-Bicycle-Master-Plan-and- Appendices. ———. 2017 (May 9). Emergency Operations Plan. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/21657/City-of-Anaheim-EOP-2017, ———. 2008 (December 2021 accessed). Average Daily Traffic Volume Map. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/410/Daily-Traffic-Counts ———. 2004 (May, certified). Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330. Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/932/EIR-No-330-Volume-I-FEIR ———.1988a (March, as amended). Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan (SP88-1). Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/1059/Sycamore-Canyon. ———.1988b (September). The Summit of Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP88-2). Anaheim, CA: Anaheim. https://www.anaheim.net/1058/Summit-of-Anaheim-Hills. Anaheim Public Utilities (APUD). 2020 (May). Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Anaheim, CA: APUD. https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/7987/Greenhouse-Gas- Reduction-Plan?bidId=. Berger, Mark. 2021 (May 11). Email correspondence regarding City Police Department staffing and capacity. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2021. California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)TM Version 2020.4.0, Developed by Breeze Software. Sacramento, CA: CAPCOA. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 7-2 References California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2021a (April 9, last accessed). Top 4 Summary: Anaheim—Pampas Lane Monitoring Station. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfourdisplay.php. ———. 2021b. (accessed March 5), Maps of Current State and Federal Area Designations. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations. ———. 2016 (May 4). Ambient Air Quality Standards. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. ———. 2014 (February). Proposed First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/draft_proposed_first_update.pdf. ———. 2008 (December). Climate Change Scoping Plan—Pursuant to AB 32. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/adopted_scoping_plan.pdf. ———. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. California Building Standards Commission (CBSC). 2019. 2019 California Green Building Standards Code. https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Resources/Page-Content/Building- Standards-Commission-Resources-List-Folder/CALGreen. California Department of Forestry And Fire Protection. 2021 (January 13, last accessed). Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) Mapper. Sacramento, CA: CALFIRE. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021a (April 11, last accessed). Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act—SB 350. Sacramento, CA: CEC. https://www.energy.ca.gov/rules-and-regulations/energy-suppliers-reporting/clean- energy-and-pollution-reduction-act-sb-350. ———. 2021b (April 11, last accessed). SB 100 Joint Agency Report. Sacramento, CA: CEC. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sb100. ———. 2018 (March) “2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions”. Sacramento, CA: CEC. https://www.energy.ca.gov/media/3452. California Geological Survey. 2001 (January 17). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Black Star Canyon Quadrangle. Sacramento, CA: California Geological Survey. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/. California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2021a (April 5, access date). California Important Farmland Finder. Sacramento, CA DOC. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/ ———. 2021b (April 6, access date). California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application (EQ Zapp). Sacramento, CA: DC. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ ———. 2021c (April 6, access date). California Landslide Inventory. Sacramento, CA: DOC. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/lsi/app/. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 7-3 References California Department of Transportation. 2021 (April 5, access date). List of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans. https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community- livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. EDR. 2021 (March 9). EDR Radius Map Report with GeoCheck for the Kindred Church Expansion Project. Shelton, CT: EDR. Federal Transit Administration. 2017. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Washington, DC: FTA. https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research- innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no- 0123_0.pdf Google Earth. 2021. Aerial Imagery and Street Views. Mountain View, CA: Google Earth. Halligan, Aimee (Environmental Planner). 2021 (May 20). Email correspondence related to landfill capacity. Niemeier, Debbie A., Douglas Eisinger, Tom P. Kear, Daniel P. Chang, Yu Meng. 1997. Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-21. Psomas. 2021. Noise Technical Analyses. Santa Ana, CA: Psomas. Orange County Water District. 2015 (June 17). Orange County Water District Groundwater Management Plan 2015 Update. Fountain Valley, CA: OCWD. https://www.ocwd.com/media/3622/groundwatermanagementplan2015update_2015062 4.pdf. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).2021 (April 9, last accessed). Final 2016 AQMP and Related SIP Submittals. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/final-2016- aqmp. ———. 2019 (April, Revision). SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. ———. 2016 (February). National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air- plans/air-quality-management-plans/naaqs-caaqs-feb2016.pdf?sfvrsn=2. ———. 2010 (September 28). Minutes for the GHG Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. ———. 2009. Localized Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis- handbook/localized-significance-thresholds ———. 2008a (July, as revised). Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/LST/ Method_final.pdf. Kindred Church Expansion Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\Initial Study\Kindred-Church_Initial-Study-032122.docx 7-4 References ———. 2008b (December 5). PROPOSAL: Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd. gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/ghgboardsynopsis.pdf?sfvrsn=2. ———. 2003 (August). White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts from Air Pollution. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/Agendas/Environmental-Justice/cumulative- impacts-working-group/cumulative-impacts-white-paper.pdf. ———. 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020 (September 3, adoption date). Connect SoCal: The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG. https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan-adopted-final-plan. ———. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability, and a High Quality of Life. Los Angeles, CA: SCAG. http://scagrtpscs.net/Pages/FINAL2016RTPSCS.aspx. State of California, Department of Finance. 2021. E-1 Population Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State — January 1, 2020 and 2021. Sacramento, CA: DOF. https://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-1/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2021a (accessed February 8). NAAQS Table. Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants/naaqs-table. ———. 2021b (February 28, current as of). Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants (Green Book). Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.epa.gov/green-book. ———. 1971 (December 31). Noise From Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances. Washington, DC: USEPA. https://www.placer.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8267/EPA-1971-Bolt-Baranek-and- Newman-PDF. TGR Geotechnical, Inc. 2020 (November). Percolation Testing Results for WQMP, Pavement Design, and Building Expansion Foundation Recommendations, Kindred Church, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California. Santa Ana, CA: TGR Geotechnical, Inc. Young, Lindsey (Interim Fire Marshall). 2021 (March 24). Email correspondence regarding City Fire Department staffing and capacity. Appendix A Air Quality Calculations Kindred Church Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - From APUD Land Use - Building size estimated for painting Parking lot for 3 lots to be paved Non-asphalt surfaces are new plazas 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Place of Worship 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.75 Acre 0.75 32,670.00 0 Parking Lot 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2022Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1047.47 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 1 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Construction Phase - Schedule by owner Demo includes site prep for plazas and moving modulars Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Trip rates based on Trip Generation letter Energy Use - No gas service Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Trips and VMT - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 30.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 2 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 100.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 6.86 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.90 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,600.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 1047.47 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.99 18.13 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 27.63 18.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.95 5.33 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 3 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.0535 0.5532 0.3623 6.5000e- 004 0.0559 0.0281 0.0840 0.0255 0.0259 0.0513 58.2556 0.0166 8.7000e- 004 58.9306 2022 0.1477 0.5793 0.5400 1.3200e- 003 0.0997 0.0247 0.1244 0.0399 0.0228 0.0626 119.3600 0.0231 4.5100e- 003 121.2830 Maximum 0.1477 0.5793 0.5400 1.3200e- 003 0.0997 0.0281 0.1244 0.0399 0.0259 0.0626 119.3600 0.0231 4.5100e- 003 121.2830 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 0.0535 0.5532 0.3623 6.5000e- 004 0.0278 0.0281 0.0560 0.0122 0.0259 0.0381 58.2556 0.0166 8.7000e- 004 58.9305 2022 0.1477 0.5793 0.5400 1.3200e- 003 0.0670 0.0247 0.0916 0.0239 0.0228 0.0467 119.3599 0.0231 4.5100e- 003 121.2829 Maximum 0.1477 0.5793 0.5400 1.3200e- 003 0.0670 0.0281 0.0916 0.0239 0.0259 0.0467 119.3599 0.0231 4.5100e- 003 121.2829 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 4 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39.07 0.00 29.18 44.79 0.00 25.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 10-4-2021 1-3-2022 0.6102 0.6102 2 1-4-2022 4-3-2022 0.3426 0.3426 3 4-4-2022 7-3-2022 0.3117 0.3117 4 7-4-2022 9-30-2022 0.0602 0.0602 Highest 0.6102 0.6102 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.1000e- 004 72.5137 Mobile 0.0614 0.0688 0.5631 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 101.4072 8.0300e- 003 5.0000e- 003 103.0970 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 17.3557 1.0257 0.0000 42.9981 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Total 0.1315 0.0688 0.5633 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 198.0310 1.0512 5.8100e- 003 226.0428 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 5 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.1000e- 004 72.5137 Mobile 0.0614 0.0688 0.5631 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 101.4072 8.0300e- 003 5.0000e- 003 103.0970 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.6779 0.5129 0.0000 21.4990 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Total 0.1315 0.0688 0.5633 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 189.3531 0.5384 5.8100e- 003 204.5438 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/4/2021 12/13/2021 5 50 2 Grading Grading 12/14/2021 1/25/2022 5 30 3 Building Construction Building Construction 1/26/2022 6/14/2022 5 100 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.38 48.79 0.00 9.51 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 6 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4 Paving Paving 6/15/2022 6/28/2022 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/29/2022 7/12/2022 5 10 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 0 0.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 0 0.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 0 0.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 0 0.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 22,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 7,500; Striped Parking Area: 6,795 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 15 Acres of Paving: 2.6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 7 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0410 0.4248 0.2759 4.6000e- 004 0.0221 0.0221 0.0204 0.0204 40.0217 0.0129 0.0000 40.3453 Total 0.0410 0.4248 0.2759 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0221 0.0226 7.0000e- 005 0.0204 0.0204 40.0217 0.0129 0.0000 40.3453 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 4.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 325.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 3 54.00 21.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 11.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 8 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.1294 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.1357 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 2.7900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 7.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.6000e- 004 2.3722 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3944 Total 9.6000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8500e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.5016 8.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 2.5301 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0410 0.4248 0.2759 4.6000e- 004 0.0221 0.0221 0.0204 0.0204 40.0216 0.0129 0.0000 40.3452 Total 0.0410 0.4248 0.2759 4.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 0.0221 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 0.0204 0.0204 40.0216 0.0129 0.0000 40.3452 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 9 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.1294 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.1357 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.5000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 2.7900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8100e- 003 7.4000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.6000e- 004 2.3722 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 2.3944 Total 9.6000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 2.8300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8500e- 003 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.5016 8.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 2.5301 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0505 0.0000 0.0505 0.0241 0.0000 0.0241 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1116 0.0698 1.2000e- 004 5.7800e- 003 5.7800e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 10.2698 3.3200e- 003 0.0000 10.3528 Total 0.0108 0.1116 0.0698 1.2000e- 004 0.0505 5.7800e- 003 0.0563 0.0241 5.3200e- 003 0.0294 10.2698 3.3200e- 003 0.0000 10.3528 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 10 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.0000e- 004 0.0153 3.3600e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.2000e- 004 4.8114 2.5000e- 004 7.6000e- 004 5.0451 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.6512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6573 Total 7.6000e- 004 0.0155 6.2000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.0700e- 003 1.8000e- 004 2.2400e- 003 5.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 5.4626 2.7000e- 004 7.8000e- 004 5.7024 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0227 0.0000 0.0227 0.0108 0.0000 0.0108 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1116 0.0698 1.2000e- 004 5.7800e- 003 5.7800e- 003 5.3200e- 003 5.3200e- 003 10.2698 3.3200e- 003 0.0000 10.3528 Total 0.0108 0.1116 0.0698 1.2000e- 004 0.0227 5.7800e- 003 0.0285 0.0108 5.3200e- 003 0.0162 10.2698 3.3200e- 003 0.0000 10.3528 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 11 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 5.0000e- 004 0.0153 3.3600e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 003 1.7000e- 004 1.4700e- 003 3.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.2000e- 004 4.8114 2.5000e- 004 7.6000e- 004 5.0451 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.1000e- 004 0.6512 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6573 Total 7.6000e- 004 0.0155 6.2000e- 003 6.0000e- 005 2.0700e- 003 1.8000e- 004 2.2400e- 003 5.6000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 5.4626 2.7000e- 004 7.8000e- 004 5.7024 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0596 0.0000 0.0596 0.0291 0.0000 0.0291 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1121 0.0804 1.4000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 5.5600e- 003 5.1100e- 003 5.1100e- 003 12.4749 4.0300e- 003 0.0000 12.5757 Total 0.0108 0.1121 0.0804 1.4000e- 004 0.0596 5.5600e- 003 0.0651 0.0291 5.1100e- 003 0.0342 12.4749 4.0300e- 003 0.0000 12.5757 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 12 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.2000e- 004 0.0163 3.6300e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.7000e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.6877 3.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 004 5.9642 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 3.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 0.7661 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7728 Total 7.1000e- 004 0.0165 6.7800e- 003 7.0000e- 005 2.5100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 2.6400e- 003 6.9000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 6.4537 3.2000e- 004 9.2000e- 004 6.7370 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0268 0.0000 0.0268 0.0131 0.0000 0.0131 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0108 0.1121 0.0804 1.4000e- 004 5.5600e- 003 5.5600e- 003 5.1100e- 003 5.1100e- 003 12.4749 4.0300e- 003 0.0000 12.5757 Total 0.0108 0.1121 0.0804 1.4000e- 004 0.0268 5.5600e- 003 0.0324 0.0131 5.1100e- 003 0.0182 12.4749 4.0300e- 003 0.0000 12.5757 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 13 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.2000e- 004 0.0163 3.6300e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.7000e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.6877 3.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 004 5.9642 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 3.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 0.7661 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.7728 Total 7.1000e- 004 0.0165 6.7800e- 003 7.0000e- 005 2.5100e- 003 1.2000e- 004 2.6400e- 003 6.9000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 6.4537 3.2000e- 004 9.2000e- 004 6.7370 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0310 0.3349 0.2625 5.2000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0142 0.0142 45.8441 0.0148 0.0000 46.2147 Total 0.0310 0.3349 0.2625 5.2000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0142 0.0142 45.8441 0.0148 0.0000 46.2147 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 14 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0500e- 003 0.0540 0.0179 2.1000e- 004 6.6200e- 003 4.9000e- 004 7.1100e- 003 1.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 20.0506 6.7000e- 004 2.8900e- 003 20.9292 Worker 9.2500e- 003 7.7100e- 003 0.1001 2.7000e- 004 0.0296 1.9000e- 004 0.0298 7.8600e- 003 1.8000e- 004 8.0400e- 003 24.3335 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 24.5492 Total 0.0113 0.0617 0.1180 4.8000e- 004 0.0362 6.8000e- 004 0.0369 9.7700e- 003 6.5000e- 004 0.0104 44.3841 1.3700e- 003 3.5600e- 003 45.4784 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0310 0.3349 0.2625 5.2000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0142 0.0142 45.8440 0.0148 0.0000 46.2147 Total 0.0310 0.3349 0.2625 5.2000e- 004 0.0155 0.0155 0.0142 0.0142 45.8440 0.0148 0.0000 46.2147 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 15 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0500e- 003 0.0540 0.0179 2.1000e- 004 6.6200e- 003 4.9000e- 004 7.1100e- 003 1.9100e- 003 4.7000e- 004 2.3800e- 003 20.0506 6.7000e- 004 2.8900e- 003 20.9292 Worker 9.2500e- 003 7.7100e- 003 0.1001 2.7000e- 004 0.0296 1.9000e- 004 0.0298 7.8600e- 003 1.8000e- 004 8.0400e- 003 24.3335 7.0000e- 004 6.7000e- 004 24.5492 Total 0.0113 0.0617 0.1180 4.8000e- 004 0.0362 6.8000e- 004 0.0369 9.7700e- 003 6.5000e- 004 0.0104 44.3841 1.3700e- 003 3.5600e- 003 45.4784 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 4.7100e- 003 0.0467 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.2500e- 003 2.2500e- 003 7.7550 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8165 Paving 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.1300e- 003 0.0467 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.2500e- 003 2.2500e- 003 7.7550 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8165 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 16 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.6759 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6819 Total 2.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.6759 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6819 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 4.7100e- 003 0.0467 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.2500e- 003 2.2500e- 003 7.7550 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8165 Paving 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.1300e- 003 0.0467 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.2500e- 003 2.2500e- 003 7.7550 2.4600e- 003 0.0000 7.8165 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 17 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.6759 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6819 Total 2.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.7800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.6759 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.6819 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0853 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0200e- 003 7.0400e- 003 9.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2787 Total 0.0863 7.0400e- 003 9.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2787 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 18 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.4957 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5001 Total 1.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.4957 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5001 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0853 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0200e- 003 7.0400e- 003 9.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2787 Total 0.0863 7.0400e- 003 9.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.2766 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2787 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 19 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.4957 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5001 Total 1.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 0.4957 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.5001 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 20 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0614 0.0688 0.5631 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 101.4072 8.0300e- 003 5.0000e- 003 103.0970 Unmitigated 0.0614 0.0688 0.5631 1.1000e- 003 0.1080 9.6000e- 004 0.1090 0.0288 9.0000e- 004 0.0297 101.4072 8.0300e- 003 5.0000e- 003 103.0970 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Place of Worship 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Total 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Place of Worship 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 95.00 5.00 64 25 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 21 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Place of Worship 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.1000e- 004 72.5137 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.1000e- 004 72.5137 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 22 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 23 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 24 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 28205.1 13.4009 3.7000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 13.4331 Place of Worship 124050 58.9392 1.6300e- 003 3.4000e- 004 59.0806 Total 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.2000e- 004 72.5137 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 25 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 28205.1 13.4009 3.7000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 13.4331 Place of Worship 124050 58.9392 1.6300e- 003 3.4000e- 004 59.0806 Total 72.3401 2.0000e- 003 4.2000e- 004 72.5137 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 26 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Unmitigated 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 8.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0615 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Total 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 27 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 8.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0615 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Total 0.0701 0.0000 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 28 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Unmitigated 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0.469334 / 0.734086 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Total 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 29 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0.469334 / 0.734086 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Total 6.9274 0.0155 4.0000e- 004 7.4337 Mitigated 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 30 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 8.6779 0.5129 0.0000 21.4990 Unmitigated 17.3557 1.0257 0.0000 42.9981 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 85.5 17.3557 1.0257 0.0000 42.9981 Total 17.3557 1.0257 0.0000 42.9981 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 31 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 42.75 8.6779 0.5129 0.0000 21.4990 Total 8.6779 0.5129 0.0000 21.4990 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 32 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:49 PMPage 33 of 33 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Kindred Church Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - From APUD Land Use - Building size estimated for painting Parking lot for 3 lots to be paved Non-asphalt surfaces are new plazas 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Place of Worship 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.75 Acre 0.75 32,670.00 0 Parking Lot 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2022Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1047.47 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 1 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Construction Phase - Schedule by owner Demo includes site prep for plazas and moving modulars Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Trip rates based on Trip Generation letter Energy Use - No gas service Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Trips and VMT - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 30.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 2 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 100.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 6.86 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.90 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,600.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 1047.47 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.99 18.13 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 27.63 18.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.95 5.33 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 3 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 1.6470 18.0462 11.2532 0.0247 6.8635 0.8687 7.7142 3.4506 0.7992 4.2341 2,481.532 7 0.5659 0.1229 2,532.293 7 2022 17.2971 15.0369 12.2874 0.0245 6.8635 0.6682 7.5317 3.4506 0.6152 4.0658 2,458.638 7 0.5652 0.1195 2,508.385 2 Maximum 17.2971 18.0462 12.2874 0.0247 6.8635 0.8687 7.7142 3.4506 0.7992 4.2341 2,481.532 7 0.5659 0.1229 2,532.293 7 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 1.6470 18.0462 11.2532 0.0247 3.2544 0.8687 4.1050 1.5977 0.7992 2.3811 2,481.532 7 0.5659 0.1229 2,532.293 7 2022 17.2971 15.0369 12.2874 0.0245 3.2544 0.6682 3.9225 1.5977 0.6152 2.2129 2,458.638 7 0.5652 0.1195 2,508.385 2 Maximum 17.2971 18.0462 12.2874 0.0247 3.2544 0.8687 4.1050 1.5977 0.7992 2.3811 2,481.532 7 0.5659 0.1229 2,532.293 7 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 4 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.58 0.00 47.35 53.70 0.00 44.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 5 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.7119 0.6991 6.2637 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9400e- 003 0.3352 1,280.047 7 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.724 6 Total 1.0959 0.6992 6.2655 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,280.051 6 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.728 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.7119 0.6991 6.2637 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9400e- 003 0.3352 1,280.047 7 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.724 6 Total 1.0959 0.6992 6.2655 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,280.051 6 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.728 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 6 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/4/2021 12/13/2021 5 50 2 Grading Grading 12/14/2021 1/25/2022 5 30 3 Building Construction Building Construction 1/26/2022 6/14/2022 5 100 4 Paving Paving 6/15/2022 6/28/2022 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/29/2022 7/12/2022 5 10 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 0 0.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 22,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 7,500; Striped Parking Area: 6,795 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 15 Acres of Paving: 2.6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 7 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 0 0.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 0 0.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 0 0.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 4.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 325.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 3 54.00 21.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 11.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 8 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 2.7200e- 003 0.0000 2.7200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.8678 0.8678 0.7984 0.7984 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Total 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.0179 0.8678 0.8857 2.7200e- 003 0.7984 0.8011 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 5.3000e- 004 0.0153 3.5300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5948 2.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 5.8665 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0376 0.0288 0.4312 1.0600e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 106.6845 3.1500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 107.5760 Total 0.0381 0.0440 0.4347 1.1100e- 003 0.1132 9.5000e- 004 0.1141 0.0300 8.8000e- 004 0.0309 112.2793 3.4400e- 003 3.6200e- 003 113.4425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 9 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 8.0700e- 003 0.0000 8.0700e- 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.8678 0.8678 0.7984 0.7984 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Total 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 8.0700e- 003 0.8678 0.8759 1.2200e- 003 0.7984 0.7996 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 5.3000e- 004 0.0153 3.5300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5948 2.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 5.8665 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0376 0.0288 0.4312 1.0600e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 106.6845 3.1500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 107.5760 Total 0.0381 0.0440 0.4347 1.1100e- 003 0.1132 9.5000e- 004 0.1141 0.0300 8.8000e- 004 0.0309 112.2793 3.4400e- 003 3.6200e- 003 113.4425 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 10 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5621 0.0000 6.5621 3.3690 0.0000 3.3690 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 0.8259 0.8259 0.7598 0.7598 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Total 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 6.5621 0.8259 7.3880 3.3690 0.7598 4.1288 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0715 2.0697 0.4774 6.9300e- 003 0.1896 0.0240 0.2136 0.0520 0.0230 0.0750 757.6334 0.0397 0.1201 794.4268 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0376 0.0288 0.4312 1.0600e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 106.6845 3.1500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 107.5760 Total 0.1091 2.0984 0.9086 7.9900e- 003 0.3014 0.0248 0.3262 0.0816 0.0237 0.1053 864.3178 0.0428 0.1229 902.0028 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 11 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9530 0.0000 2.9530 1.5160 0.0000 1.5160 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 0.8259 0.8259 0.7598 0.7598 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Total 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 2.9530 0.8259 3.7788 1.5160 0.7598 2.2758 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0715 2.0697 0.4774 6.9300e- 003 0.1896 0.0240 0.2136 0.0520 0.0230 0.0750 757.6334 0.0397 0.1201 794.4268 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0376 0.0288 0.4312 1.0600e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 106.6845 3.1500e- 003 2.7300e- 003 107.5760 Total 0.1091 2.0984 0.9086 7.9900e- 003 0.3014 0.0248 0.3262 0.0816 0.0237 0.1053 864.3178 0.0428 0.1229 902.0028 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 12 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5621 0.0000 6.5621 3.3690 0.0000 3.3690 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 0.6539 0.6539 0.6016 0.6016 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Total 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 6.5621 0.6539 7.2161 3.3690 0.6016 3.9706 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0505 1.8195 0.4242 6.7300e- 003 0.1896 0.0135 0.2031 0.0520 0.0129 0.0649 737.5069 0.0392 0.1170 773.3567 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3936 1.0200e- 003 0.1118 7.2000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.6000e- 004 0.0303 103.3442 2.8200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 104.1603 Total 0.0851 1.8447 0.8178 7.7500e- 003 0.3014 0.0142 0.3156 0.0816 0.0136 0.0952 840.8511 0.0420 0.1195 877.5169 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 13 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9530 0.0000 2.9530 1.5160 0.0000 1.5160 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 0.6539 0.6539 0.6016 0.6016 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Total 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 2.9530 0.6539 3.6069 1.5160 0.6016 2.1176 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0505 1.8195 0.4242 6.7300e- 003 0.1896 0.0135 0.2031 0.0520 0.0129 0.0649 737.5069 0.0392 0.1170 773.3567 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0346 0.0253 0.3936 1.0200e- 003 0.1118 7.2000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.6000e- 004 0.0303 103.3442 2.8200e- 003 2.5000e- 003 104.1603 Total 0.0851 1.8447 0.8178 7.7500e- 003 0.3014 0.0142 0.3156 0.0816 0.0136 0.0952 840.8511 0.0420 0.1195 877.5169 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 14 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Total 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0413 1.0287 0.3527 4.1100e- 003 0.1345 9.8000e- 003 0.1443 0.0387 9.3700e- 003 0.0481 441.9694 0.0148 0.0637 461.3178 Worker 0.1868 0.1364 2.1253 5.5200e- 003 0.6036 3.8600e- 003 0.6075 0.1601 3.5600e- 003 0.1636 558.0586 0.0152 0.0135 562.4654 Total 0.2282 1.1651 2.4780 9.6300e- 003 0.7381 0.0137 0.7518 0.1988 0.0129 0.2117 1,000.028 0 0.0300 0.0772 1,023.783 2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 15 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Total 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0413 1.0287 0.3527 4.1100e- 003 0.1345 9.8000e- 003 0.1443 0.0387 9.3700e- 003 0.0481 441.9694 0.0148 0.0637 461.3178 Worker 0.1868 0.1364 2.1253 5.5200e- 003 0.6036 3.8600e- 003 0.6075 0.1601 3.5600e- 003 0.1636 558.0586 0.0152 0.0135 562.4654 Total 0.2282 1.1651 2.4780 9.6300e- 003 0.7381 0.0137 0.7518 0.1988 0.0129 0.2117 1,000.028 0 0.0300 0.0772 1,023.783 2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 16 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Paving 0.4847 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4259 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0519 0.0379 0.5904 1.5300e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 155.0163 4.2200e- 003 3.7500e- 003 156.2404 Total 0.0519 0.0379 0.5904 1.5300e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 155.0163 4.2200e- 003 3.7500e- 003 156.2404 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 17 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Paving 0.4847 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4259 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0519 0.0379 0.5904 1.5300e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 155.0163 4.2200e- 003 3.7500e- 003 156.2404 Total 0.0519 0.0379 0.5904 1.5300e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 155.0163 4.2200e- 003 3.7500e- 003 156.2404 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 18 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 17.0545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 17.2590 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0381 0.0278 0.4329 1.1200e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 113.6786 3.1000e- 003 2.7500e- 003 114.5763 Total 0.0381 0.0278 0.4329 1.1200e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 113.6786 3.1000e- 003 2.7500e- 003 114.5763 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 19 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 17.0545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 17.2590 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0381 0.0278 0.4329 1.1200e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 113.6786 3.1000e- 003 2.7500e- 003 114.5763 Total 0.0381 0.0278 0.4329 1.1200e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 113.6786 3.1000e- 003 2.7500e- 003 114.5763 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 20 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.7119 0.6991 6.2637 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9400e- 003 0.3352 1,280.047 7 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.724 6 Unmitigated 0.7119 0.6991 6.2637 0.0126 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9400e- 003 0.3352 1,280.047 7 0.0949 0.0581 1,299.724 6 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Place of Worship 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Total 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Place of Worship 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 95.00 5.00 64 25 11 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 21 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Place of Worship 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 22 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 23 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 24 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Unmitigated 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Total 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 25 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Total 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 26 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:45 PMPage 27 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Kindred Church Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - From APUD Land Use - Building size estimated for painting Parking lot for 3 lots to be paved Non-asphalt surfaces are new plazas 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Place of Worship 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.75 Acre 0.75 32,670.00 0 Parking Lot 1.85 Acre 1.85 80,586.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 2022Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1047.47 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 1 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Construction Phase - Schedule by owner Demo includes site prep for plazas and moving modulars Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Off-road equipment by Applicant Off-road Equipment - Demolition - Grading - Vehicle Trips - Trip rates based on Trip Generation letter Energy Use - No gas service Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Waste Mitigation - Trips and VMT - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Vehicle Emission Factors - Fleet Mix - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 30.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 2 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.0 Emissions Summary tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 100.00 tblEnergyUse NT24NG 6.86 0.00 tblEnergyUse T24NG 13.90 0.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 2,600.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1543.28 1047.47 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 5.99 18.13 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 27.63 18.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.95 5.33 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 3 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 1.6488 18.1312 11.2174 0.0246 6.8635 0.8687 7.7142 3.4506 0.7992 4.2341 2,475.959 1 0.5658 0.1231 2,526.780 8 2022 17.2998 15.1134 12.2390 0.0244 6.8635 0.6682 7.5317 3.4506 0.6152 4.0658 2,453.391 0 0.5652 0.1197 2,503.199 2 Maximum 17.2998 18.1312 12.2390 0.0246 6.8635 0.8687 7.7142 3.4506 0.7992 4.2341 2,475.959 1 0.5658 0.1231 2,526.780 8 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2021 1.6488 18.1312 11.2174 0.0246 3.2544 0.8687 4.1050 1.5977 0.7992 2.3812 2,475.959 1 0.5658 0.1231 2,526.780 8 2022 17.2998 15.1134 12.2390 0.0244 3.2544 0.6682 3.9226 1.5977 0.6152 2.2129 2,453.391 0 0.5652 0.1197 2,503.199 2 Maximum 17.2998 18.1312 12.2390 0.0246 3.2544 0.8687 4.1050 1.5977 0.7992 2.3812 2,475.959 1 0.5658 0.1231 2,526.780 8 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 4 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52.58 0.00 47.35 53.70 0.00 44.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 5 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.6957 0.7534 6.2015 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,225.966 1 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.557 6 Total 1.0797 0.7534 6.2033 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9600e- 003 0.3352 1,225.969 9 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.561 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Energy 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mobile 0.6957 0.7534 6.2015 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,225.966 1 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.557 6 Total 1.0797 0.7534 6.2033 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9600e- 003 0.3352 1,225.969 9 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.561 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 6 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 10/4/2021 12/13/2021 5 50 2 Grading Grading 12/14/2021 1/25/2022 5 30 3 Building Construction Building Construction 1/26/2022 6/14/2022 5 100 4 Paving Paving 6/15/2022 6/28/2022 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/29/2022 7/12/2022 5 10 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 0.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 0 0.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 22,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 7,500; Striped Parking Area: 6,795 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 15 Acres of Paving: 2.6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 7 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 0 0.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 0 0.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 0 0.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 4.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 325.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 3 54.00 21.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 11.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 8 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.0179 0.0000 0.0179 2.7200e- 003 0.0000 2.7200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.8678 0.8678 0.7984 0.7984 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Total 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.0179 0.8678 0.8857 2.7200e- 003 0.7984 0.8011 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 5.2000e- 004 0.0159 3.5900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5955 2.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 5.8672 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0401 0.0318 0.3953 1.0000e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 101.0263 3.1800e- 003 2.9200e- 003 101.9747 Total 0.0406 0.0477 0.3989 1.0500e- 003 0.1132 9.5000e- 004 0.1141 0.0300 8.8000e- 004 0.0309 106.6218 3.4700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 107.8419 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 9 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.2 Demolition - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 8.0700e- 003 0.0000 8.0700e- 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 1.2200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 0.8678 0.8678 0.7984 0.7984 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Total 1.6082 16.6587 10.8185 0.0179 8.0700e- 003 0.8678 0.8759 1.2200e- 003 0.7984 0.7996 1,730.052 4 0.5595 1,744.040 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 5.2000e- 004 0.0159 3.5900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 1.8000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 5.5955 2.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 5.8672 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0401 0.0318 0.3953 1.0000e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 101.0263 3.1800e- 003 2.9200e- 003 101.9747 Total 0.0406 0.0477 0.3989 1.0500e- 003 0.1132 9.5000e- 004 0.1141 0.0300 8.8000e- 004 0.0309 106.6218 3.4700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 107.8419 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 10 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5621 0.0000 6.5621 3.3690 0.0000 3.3690 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 0.8259 0.8259 0.7598 0.7598 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Total 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 6.5621 0.8259 7.3880 3.3690 0.7598 4.1288 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0704 2.1517 0.4856 6.9300e- 003 0.1896 0.0240 0.2137 0.0520 0.0230 0.0750 757.7179 0.0396 0.1202 794.5152 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0401 0.0318 0.3953 1.0000e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 101.0263 3.1800e- 003 2.9200e- 003 101.9747 Total 0.1105 2.1834 0.8809 7.9300e- 003 0.3014 0.0248 0.3262 0.0816 0.0237 0.1053 858.7443 0.0428 0.1231 896.4899 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 11 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2021 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9530 0.0000 2.9530 1.5160 0.0000 1.5160 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 0.8259 0.8259 0.7598 0.7598 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Total 1.5380 15.9478 9.9709 0.0167 2.9530 0.8259 3.7788 1.5160 0.7598 2.2758 1,617.214 9 0.5230 1,630.290 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0704 2.1517 0.4856 6.9300e- 003 0.1896 0.0240 0.2137 0.0520 0.0230 0.0750 757.7179 0.0396 0.1202 794.5152 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0401 0.0318 0.3953 1.0000e- 003 0.1118 7.7000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 7.1000e- 004 0.0304 101.0263 3.1800e- 003 2.9200e- 003 101.9747 Total 0.1105 2.1834 0.8809 7.9300e- 003 0.3014 0.0248 0.3262 0.0816 0.0237 0.1053 858.7443 0.0428 0.1231 896.4899 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 12 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5621 0.0000 6.5621 3.3690 0.0000 3.3690 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 0.6539 0.6539 0.6016 0.6016 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Total 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 6.5621 0.6539 7.2161 3.3690 0.6016 3.9706 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0493 1.8933 0.4317 6.7300e- 003 0.1896 0.0136 0.2032 0.0520 0.0130 0.0650 737.7231 0.0391 0.1171 773.5826 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0370 0.0279 0.3614 9.7000e- 004 0.1118 7.2000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.6000e- 004 0.0303 97.8803 2.8500e- 003 2.6700e- 003 98.7483 Total 0.0863 1.9212 0.7931 7.7000e- 003 0.3014 0.0143 0.3157 0.0816 0.0136 0.0953 835.6034 0.0420 0.1197 872.3309 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 13 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.9530 0.0000 2.9530 1.5160 0.0000 1.5160 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 0.6539 0.6539 0.6016 0.6016 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Total 1.2695 13.1922 9.4566 0.0167 2.9530 0.6539 3.6069 1.5160 0.6016 2.1176 1,617.787 6 0.5232 1,630.868 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0493 1.8933 0.4317 6.7300e- 003 0.1896 0.0136 0.2032 0.0520 0.0130 0.0650 737.7231 0.0391 0.1171 773.5826 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0370 0.0279 0.3614 9.7000e- 004 0.1118 7.2000e- 004 0.1125 0.0296 6.6000e- 004 0.0303 97.8803 2.8500e- 003 2.6700e- 003 98.7483 Total 0.0863 1.9212 0.7931 7.7000e- 003 0.3014 0.0143 0.3157 0.0816 0.0136 0.0953 835.6034 0.0420 0.1197 872.3309 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 14 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Total 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0408 1.0711 0.3649 4.1100e- 003 0.1345 9.8300e- 003 0.1444 0.0387 9.4100e- 003 0.0481 442.1354 0.0147 0.0638 461.5071 Worker 0.2000 0.1507 1.9514 5.2300e- 003 0.6036 3.8600e- 003 0.6075 0.1601 3.5600e- 003 0.1636 528.5537 0.0154 0.0144 533.2411 Total 0.2408 1.2218 2.3163 9.3400e- 003 0.7381 0.0137 0.7518 0.1988 0.0130 0.2118 970.6891 0.0301 0.0782 994.7482 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 15 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Total 0.6201 6.6977 5.2493 0.0104 0.3089 0.3089 0.2842 0.2842 1,010.688 8 0.3269 1,018.860 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0408 1.0711 0.3649 4.1100e- 003 0.1345 9.8300e- 003 0.1444 0.0387 9.4100e- 003 0.0481 442.1354 0.0147 0.0638 461.5071 Worker 0.2000 0.1507 1.9514 5.2300e- 003 0.6036 3.8600e- 003 0.6075 0.1601 3.5600e- 003 0.1636 528.5537 0.0154 0.0144 533.2411 Total 0.2408 1.2218 2.3163 9.3400e- 003 0.7381 0.0137 0.7518 0.1988 0.0130 0.2118 970.6891 0.0301 0.0782 994.7482 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 16 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Paving 0.4847 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4259 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0556 0.0419 0.5421 1.4500e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 146.8205 4.2700e- 003 4.0100e- 003 148.1225 Total 0.0556 0.0419 0.5421 1.4500e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 146.8205 4.2700e- 003 4.0100e- 003 148.1225 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 17 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.5 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9412 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Paving 0.4847 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.4259 9.3322 11.6970 0.0179 0.4879 0.4879 0.4500 0.4500 1,709.689 2 0.5419 1,723.235 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0556 0.0419 0.5421 1.4500e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 146.8205 4.2700e- 003 4.0100e- 003 148.1225 Total 0.0556 0.0419 0.5421 1.4500e- 003 0.1677 1.0700e- 003 0.1687 0.0445 9.9000e- 004 0.0455 146.8205 4.2700e- 003 4.0100e- 003 148.1225 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 18 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 17.0545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 17.2590 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0407 0.0307 0.3975 1.0700e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 107.6684 3.1300e- 003 2.9400e- 003 108.6232 Total 0.0407 0.0307 0.3975 1.0700e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 107.6684 3.1300e- 003 2.9400e- 003 108.6232 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 19 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 17.0545 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 17.2590 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0407 0.0307 0.3975 1.0700e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 107.6684 3.1300e- 003 2.9400e- 003 108.6232 Total 0.0407 0.0307 0.3975 1.0700e- 003 0.1230 7.9000e- 004 0.1237 0.0326 7.2000e- 004 0.0333 107.6684 3.1300e- 003 2.9400e- 003 108.6232 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 20 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.6957 0.7534 6.2015 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,225.966 1 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.557 6 Unmitigated 0.6957 0.7534 6.2015 0.0120 1.2211 0.0107 1.2318 0.3253 9.9500e- 003 0.3352 1,225.966 1 0.0989 0.0608 1,246.557 6 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Place of Worship 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Total 79.95 271.95 271.95 287,515 287,515 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Place of Worship 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 95.00 5.00 64 25 11 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 21 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Parking Lot 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 Place of Worship 0.546774 0.061880 0.186704 0.127505 0.022909 0.005912 0.010702 0.008032 0.000940 0.000617 0.023937 0.000692 0.003397 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 22 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 23 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Place of Worship 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 24 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Unmitigated 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Total 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 25 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.3371 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 1.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Total 0.3840 2.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 3.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.1100e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 26 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 12/15/2021 2:52 PMPage 27 of 27 Kindred Church - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Appendix B Biological Resources Constraints Analysis 5 Hutton Centre Drive Suite 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel 714.751.7373 Fax 714.545.8883 www.Psomas.com May 19, 2021 Mr. Andy Uk VIA EMAIL Associate Planner auk@anaheim.net Planning and Building Development 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, California 92805 Subject: Results of a Biological Constraints Analysis for Kindred Church Expansion Project in the City of Anaheim, California Dear Mr. Uk: This Letter Report presents the findings of a biological constraints survey for the Kindred Church Expansion Project site (hereinafter referred to as the “project site”) located in the City of Anaheim, California. The purpose of this Letter Report is to document existing conditions and evaluate potential biological constraints on the project site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION The project site is located southwest of the intersection of State Route (SR) 91 with SR-241 (Exhibit 1). The site is approximately 11.5 acres with a 0.8-acre offsite percolation area, both specifically located at 8712–8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is a frontage road along the south-side of SR-91 (Exhibit 2). The project would expand the existing Kindred Church over two phases. Phase 1 would include demolition of an existing structure, relocation of modular buildings, and construction or development of mini-plazas, a remodeled parking lot, and a new temporary turf parking lot. Phase 2 would include a remodeled auditorium with two new wings providing additional seating and back-of- house areas; four new modular buildings; a remodeled parking lot; and addition of a monument sign, landscaping, and a pedestrian pathway. The project site is located on the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS’) Black Star Canyon 7.5-minute quadrangle map with an elevation of approximately 360 to 490 feet above mean sea level (Exhibit 3). Surrounding land uses include open space to the east and west, transportation to the north, and slope stabilization for residential development to the south. SURVEY METHODS Psomas Senior Biologist Steve Norton conducted a general plant and wildlife survey of the project site and a 100-foot buffer on March 11, 2021. Representative photographs of the project site are included in Attachment A. Plant species observed were recorded in field notes. Plant species were identified in the field or collected for subsequent identification using keys in the Jepson eFlora (Jepson Flora Project 2019). Nomenclature of plant taxa conform to the Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (CDFW 2021b) for special status species and the Jepson eFlora Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 2 (Jepson Flora Project 2019) for all other taxa. Nomenclature for native vegetation types generally matches those from the online edition of A Manual of California Vegetation (CNPS 2019). Wildlife species detected during the survey were documented in field notes. Active searches for reptiles and amphibians included lifting, overturning, and carefully replacing rocks and debris. Birds were identified by visual and auditory recognition. Surveys for mammals were conducted during the day and included searching for and identifying diagnostic sign, including scat, footprints, scratch-outs, dust bowls, burrows, and trails. Taxonomy and nomenclature for wildlife generally follows the Special Animals List (CDFW 2021c) for special status species. Nomenclature for other species follows Crother (2017) for amphibians and reptiles, the American Ornithological Society (AOS 2018) for birds, and the Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico (Bradley, et al. 2014) for mammals. Prior to the survey, a literature review was conducted to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats that have been reported to occur in the vicinity of the project site. Resources reviewed included the California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS’) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2021b) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW’s) California Natural Diversity Database (CDFW 2021a). Database searches included the USGS’ Black Star Canyon, Prado Dam, Orange, and Yorba Linda 7.5-minute quadrangles. EXISTING CONDITIONS Vegetation The project site is predominantly developed with stands of ornamental vegetation spread throughout. The ornamental vegetation is subject to regular landscaping activities and other disturbances associated with human activity onsite. The vegetation consists of ornamental shrubs, such as rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), in the parking lot medians; a large grove of comprised mostly of European olive (Olea europaea) trees with no vegetative understory along a manufactured footpath; and a large variety of landscaped ornamental trees and shrub species throughout the remainder of the site, including date palm (Phoenix sp.), pine (Pinus sp.), Peruvian pepper (Schinus molle), pampas grass (Cortaderia selloana), golden wattle (Acacia sp.), lavender (Lavendula sp.), etc. The areas adjacent to the project site (within the 100-foot buffer) are mostly undeveloped with the exception of East Santa Ana Canyon Road and SR-91 to the north and the manufactured slope developed for slope stabilization to the south. The vegetation on the manufactured slope is comprised of landscaped ornamental consistent with vegetation located on the project site. Open space land uses border the project site to the east and west. The vegetation types in the 100-foot buffer that occur in this open space include coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) forest to the east, lemonade berry (Rhus integrefolia) scrub in isolated stands to the east and southwest, and expansive fennel (Foeniculum vulgare) fields to the west. The coast live oak forest, which is located off-site to the east, is comprised of a dense tree canopy of mature coast live oak trees along the bottom of the valley that shows evidence of a drainage feature. The understory is mostly open with portions dominated either by leaf litter, English ivy (Hedera helix), or a mix of low-growing plant species including chilicothe (Marah macrocarpa), phacelia (Phacelia sp.), and non-native grasses (Bromus spp.). The vegetation along the boundary of the coast live oak forest is comprised of various native shrub species, including laurel sumac (Malosma laurina) and California sagebrush (Artemisia californica). The lemonade berry scrub, which is located off-site to the east and southwest, is comprised of a broad mix of native shrub species, including lemonade berry, laurel sumac, California sagebrush, California encelia Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 3 (Encelia californica), blue elderberry (Sambucus nigra ssp. caerulea), and scattered prickly pear (Opuntia sp.). The fennel fields, which are located off-site to the west, are comprised of large, continuous stands of non- native grasses and forbs, including fennel, mustard (Brassica sp.), and non-native grasses. Occurrences of native shrub species are sparsely scattered, including California sagebrush and California encelia. Wildlife Habitat The project site is composed of landscaped, ornamental vegetation and provides habitat for urban-tolerant wildlife species. The vegetation adjacent to the project site contains habitat suitable for less-urban tolerant wildlife species and some of those species likely have foraging ranges that extend onto the project site. Common wildlife species observed or expected to occur in the project site are discussed below. A shallow, man-made pond feature occurs in the portion of the project site that would be developed in the future as Parking Lot 3. This pond is regularly drained completely and treated with chlorine every few months (Pers comm. 2021). Evidence of these practices were observed during the site visit with the water levels exposing the pond bed and the aquatic vegetation appearing shriveled and discolored. No fish species were observed onsite and none are expected to occur. No amphibian species (adults, tadpoles, or eggs) were observed onsite. Because the ponded water onsite is chemically treated, no amphibian species are expected to breed onsite. No reptile species were observed during the survey. Common reptile species that likely occur in the project site include Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), western side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana elegans), southern alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata), and California gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer annectens). Bird species observed during the survey included mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), Nuttall’s woodpecker (Picoides nuttallii), northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos), California scrub-jay (Aphelocoma californica), blue-gray gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata), California towhee (Pipilo crissalis), song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus), wrentit (Chamaea fasciata), common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), spotted towhee (Pipilo maculatus), California thrasher (Toxostoma redivivum), and lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria). Desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii) was observed during the survey. Other small-sized mammal species expected to occur include California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi), eastern fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) and Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). Medium-sized mammal species expected to occur also include Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), common raccoon (Procyon lotor), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), and coyote (Canis latrans). Many of these mammal species are nocturnal and evidence of these species may not be observable during the day. Bat species are also nocturnal and occur throughout of Southern California. The large oak and pine trees present on the project site contain suitable roosting habitat for tree roosting bats such as hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), and the onsite buildings contain suitable habitat for crevice roosting bats such as Yuma myotis (Myotis yumanensis) and Mexican free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis). Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 4 Special Status Resources Special Status Vegetation Types Vegetation types may be considered special status by State and federal resource agencies, academic institutions, and various conservation groups (e.g., the CNPS). Local jurisdictions may also protect special status vegetation types through ordinances, codes, regulations, or planning policies. The lemonade berry scrub located inside the 100-foot buffer, but outside of the project site, is designated as a Sensitive Natural Community per definitions set by CDFW for the CEQA process (CDFW 2020). While the coast live oak forest, which is located within the survey buffer but outside of the project site, is not listed as a sensitive natural community, it’s associated with riparian vegetation and is potentially subject to CDFW jurisdiction under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. Jurisdictional Areas Drainages and associated vegetation types may be subject to regulatory oversight requiring permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the CDFW, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) pursuant to Sections 404 and 401of the federal Clean Water Act and Sections 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code. The USACE and RWQCB take jurisdiction over areas considered “waters of the U.S.” and wetlands. Jurisdictional waters are typically defined by the ordinary high water mark and other specific criteria. The limits of CDFW jurisdiction are often defined by the outer limits of riparian vegetation. A potentially jurisdictional drainage feature was identified during the survey along the eastern boundary of the project site. The limits of jurisdiction for USACE and/or RWQCB are restricted to the bed and banks for this feature which generally occur outside of the project site boundaries. The limits of jurisdiction for CDFW, however, include the outer drip line of the coast live oak forest, which extends into the project site boundaries. A small fountain and larger man-made pond are also present on the project site; however, neither are considered jurisdictional due to their lack of connectivity to other drainage features, lack of associated riparian or wetland vegetation, and due to these features being excavated wholly in upland areas not associated with traditional stormwater flows. A roadside drainage ditch is located along the south side of East Santa Ana Canyon Road (along the northern boundary of the project site). This feature did not contain any wetland or riparian vegetation, but has potential to be jurisdictional under the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW due to potential connectivity to other drainage features including the feature along the eastern boundary of the project site. Special Status Plant and Wildlife Species Plants or wildlife may be considered to have “special status” due to declining populations, vulnerability to habitat change, or restricted distributions. Certain special status species have been listed as Threatened or Endangered under State and/or federal Endangered Species Acts. Special Status Plants The project site is comprised development and heavily landscaped, ornamental areas. No suitable habitat for any special status plant species is anticipated to occur on the project site. Areas adjacent to the project site contain suitable habitat for several special status plant species; however, no further assessment is needed as no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated in these areas. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 5 Special Status Wildlife Several special status wildlife species are known to occur in the project region. No federally- or State-listed Threatened or Endangered species are anticipated to occur on the project site due to the extent of the existing development and frequency of landscaping activities. Areas within 100 feet of the project site, however, contain suitable habitat for several federally or State-listed Threatened or Endangered species. The lemonade berry scrub contains habitat suitable for the federally-listed Threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica). The lemonade berry scrub and fennel fields contain habitat suitable for Crotch’s bumblebee (Bombus crotchii), which is a candidate for State-listing as Endangered. The areas adjacent to the project site also contain habitat suitable for non-listed special status wildlife species, including California Species of Special Concern (SSC). While none of these species are expected to breed or roost on the project site, the following species have potential to forage onsite: coast range newt (Taricha torosa), coastal whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri), red-diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber), coast patch-nosed snake (Salvadora hexalepis virgultea), coastal cactus wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis), grasshopper sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum), pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), and western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus). Raptor species, including the SSC Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii), also have potential to nest in the ornamental trees or adjacent to the project site. Other Potential Biological Constraints Critical Habitat Critical habitat is designated for the survival and recovery of species listed as Threatened or Endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. The project site is not located in areas designated or proposed as Critical Habitat. Regional Conservation Planning The project site is located in the Central/Coastal Subregion of the Natural Communities Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) in Orange County. The purpose of this plan is to provide regional protection and recovery of multiple species and habitat while allowing compatible land use and appropriate development. The project applicant is not a participant in the NCCP/HCP and the terms of the NCCP/HCP Implementation Agreement do not explicitly apply to this project. Regardless, the NCCP/HCP has identified regional wildlife movement corridors and reserve areas, which are discussed in more detail below. Furthermore, the NCCP/HCP generally tracks populations of covered species and has developed a framework for surveying these species in the NCCP/HCP plan area sufficient to determine species presence or absence. Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone The project is located within the City’s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone (2020). The Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone was established to provide for and promote orderly growth in an area of the City considered to have distinctive, scenic importance. Section 18.18.040 of the City’s Municipal Code contains policies and procedures for tree preservation within the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, as well as policies pertaining to the removal of trees in this zone. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 6 The project requires the removal of 25 trees within the project site. The project has been designed to retain much of the existing vegetation on the project site, which avoids potential visual impacts to views from areas within the scenic corridor. Trees removed would be replaced with other vegetation throughout the project site as shown in the project’s landscaping plan. The net number of trees and landscaped area would increase with the project when compared to existing conditions, including enhanced landscaping at the project site entrance. Given that the current property owner (i.e. the project applicant) originally planted all trees within the project site, removal of these trees is exempt from the requirements for a Specimen Tree Removal Permit. Furthermore, the trees proposed for removal are not located in an area highly visible from a public or private right-of-way or in a commonly viewed slope that would result in damage to viewers from East Santa Ana Canyon Road, SR-91, or other public vantage points within the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Wildlife Movement Within large, open space areas where few or no man-made or naturally occurring physical constraints to wildlife movement are present, wildlife corridors may not yet exist. However, once open space areas become constrained and/or fragmented as a result of urban development or the construction of physical obstacles (e.g., roads and highways), the remaining landscape features or travel routes that connect the larger open space areas become corridors as long as they provide adequate space, cover, food, and water and do not contain obstacles or distractions (e.g., man-made noise, lighting) that would generally hinder wildlife movement. The project site is bordered to the east and west by large, naturally vegetated areas of open space. The open space area west of the project site is confined by residential development to the west and south, and by SR-91 to the north. The open space area east of the project site includes a conservation easement that is adjacent to the eastern boundary of the project site which ultimately connects to a larger Reserve Area included as part of the Central/Coastal HCP/NCCP reserve system (USFWS 2009). The ornamental landscaping on the project site may provide limited wildlife movement opportunities for more urban tolerant wildlife species; however, these opportunities are limited and the existing development (including street lighting) likely deter most movement across the site. Connectivity between the open space areas to the east and west of the project site is available via the approximately 300-foot wide, landscaped slope- stabilization north of the project site. This landscaped area may still limit movement of some native species because it lacks native vegetation or natural vegetation types. Nesting Birds and Raptors The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) protects migratory birds and their nests and eggs, both common and special status. Bird species protected under the provisions of the MBTA are identified by the List of Migratory Birds (50 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] §10.13, as amended). Since the 1970s, the MBTA has been interpreted to prohibit the accidental or “incidental” take of migratory birds. However, in December 2017, the acting Solicitor of the Department of the Interior issued a new memorandum disclaiming the interpretation of the MBTA as prohibiting incidental take of migratory birds (DOI 2017). In response to the federal changes in interpretation of the MBTA, the CDFW and the California Attorney General have issued an advisory affirming California’s protections for migratory birds (CDFW and Attorney General 2018). Multiple sections of California Fish and Game Code provide protection for nesting birds and raptors unless the California Fish and Game Code or its implementing regulations provide otherwise. Section 3503 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird. Section 3503.5 Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 7 specifically addresses raptors (i.e., birds of prey in the orders Falconiformes and Strigiformes) and makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy these birds or their nest or eggs. Section 3513 prohibits the take or possession of migratory non-game birds as designated by the MBTA or any part of such bird. Migratory birds and raptors (both common and special status) have the potential to nest in the vegetation on or adjacent to the project site. Take of active bird nests would be a violation of California Fish and Game Code. Roosting Bats The CDFW is increasingly recommending the use of pre-construction roosting bat surveys prior to impacts on mature vegetation to avoid and minimize impacts on these species, in compliance with Section 4150 of California Fish and Game Code. As discussed above, bats may roost in large, mature, ornamental trees on the project site as well as within onsite buildings that contain suitable crevices. CEQA IMPACT ANALYSIS Impact Question a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Response Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. No native vegetation types or suitable habitat for any special status plant or wildlife species occurs on the project site. No direct impact to any special status species is anticipated as a result of this project. The following federally- and/or State-listed Threatened, Endangered, or Candidate wildlife species have potential to occur adjacent to the project site and could be subject to indirect impacts (such as noise and vibration) associated with the proposed project: coastal California gnatcatcher and Crotch’s bumblebee. Any impact to these species would be considered significant. Potential impacts to these species would be reduced to less than significant levels by implementing the recommendations listed at the end of this report. The following SSC have potential to occur adjacent to the project site and could be subject to indirect impacts associated with the proposed project: coast range newt, coastal whiptail, red-diamond rattlesnake, coast patch-nosed snake, coastal cactus wren, grasshopper sparrow, pallid bat, and western mastiff bat. Cooper’s hawk, an additional SSC, has potential to nest both on and adjacent to the project site. Impacts to any bird species during its nesting activities, including coastal cactus wren, grasshopper sparrow, and Cooper’s hawk, would be a violation of the California Fish and Game Code and would be considered significant. Impacts to nesting birds would be reduced to less than significant by implementing the recommendations listed at the end of this report. Potential indirect impacts to SSC not otherwise addressed by bird nesting minimization measures are considered less than significant because the proposed project would not reduce the populations of these species below self-sustaining levels. Potential indirect impacts to any special status plant species adjacent to the project site resulting from dust accumulation would be less than significant and no additional measures are recommended. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 8 No impacts to any federally designated Critical Habitat or to habitat of any other special status plant or wildlife species would occur as a result of the project. Impact Questions b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Response No Impact. A drainage feature potentially jurisdictional under USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW extends along the eastern boundary of the project site. The limits of jurisdiction for USACE and/or RWQCB are restricted to the bed and banks for this feature which generally occur outside of the project site boundaries and no impacts are anticipated. The limits of jurisdiction for CDFW, however, includes the coast live oak forest which extends into the project site boundaries. No tree or vegetation removal within any area associated with this coast live oak forest or associated drainage feature would occur as part of the proposed project and no impacts are anticipated. A roadside drainage ditch also occurs along the south side of East Santa Ana Canyon Road (along the northern boundary of the project site). This feature did not contain any wetland or riparian vegetation, but has potential to be jurisdictional under the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW due to potential connectivity to other drainage features including the feature along the eastern boundary of the project site. This feature occurs outside the impact boundary of the proposed project and no impacts would occur. Therefore, to the project would have no impact to any wetlands or other jurisdictional areas pursuant to the USACE, RWQCB, or CDFW. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 9 Impact Question d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Response Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The existing conditions at the project site currently limit or deter wildlife movement between the open space land uses to the west and east of the project site. Regardless, the proposed project consists of the redevelopment of an existing developed project site consistent with the existing land uses applicable to the site. Aspects of the project that could further constrain wildlife movement include the addition and relocation of structures, removal of vegetation, and the addition of lighting throughout the project site. Any of these new effects to wildlife movement resulting from the proposed project would not likely result in a significant effect to regional wildlife movement. Impacts to wildlife movement corridors would be less than significant. The vegetation on and adjacent to the project site provide suitable nesting habitat for bird species protected under California Fish and Game Code. A routine construction practice to avoid impacts is to schedule tree and vegetation removal outside of the breeding season. This requires that all tree removal occur during the non-nesting bird season (i.e., September 1 to February 14). If vegetation removal activities are planned to occur during the nesting season, impacts to actively nesting bird species protected under the California Fish and Game Code could be impacted. Implementation of the recommendations below would ensure that impacts to nesting birds are reduced to less than significant levels. Impact Questions e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Response Less Than Significant Impact. The project would require vegetation removal within the City’s Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone on a project site that is visible from an eligible state scenic highway. As discussed above, views of the project site would be minimally affected by the removal of 25 trees associated with the project. Furthermore, the project would be developed consistent with the Municipal Code policies related to the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Therefore, less than significant impacts would result from the project related to this threshold, and no mitigation is required. Impact Questions f) Conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Response Less than Significant. The project site is located within the boundaries of the Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP; however, it is not within a Reserve Area or Special Linkage Area and no impacts to Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP are anticipated. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 10 The eastern boundary of project site borders a conservation easement. Proposed night lighting associated with the project has the potential to affect the function of this conservation easement area. However, the project design identifies that all new and replaced pole mounted light fixtures would consist of downcast, shielded lighting. This would focus new project lighting onsite and would minimize illumination of the adjacent conservation easement. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant and no additional measures are recommended beyond the project design. RECOMMENDATIONS The following measures are recommended to avoid and minimize impacts on biological resources: 1. Focused surveys for coastal California gnatcatcher are recommended to determine whether the species is present or absent in the adjacent lemonade berry scrub vegetation to minimize potential indirect impact. Per the survey methods outlined in the Central/Coastal NCCP/HCP, three focused survey visits by a permitted coastal California gnatcatcher biologist are recommended prior to any construction activities within 500 feet of any suitable habitat. The surveys can be conducted year-round; however, it is preferable to conduct the surveys between March 15 and June 30. If the coastal California gnatcatcher are determined to be absent and construction occurs within one year of survey completion, then no further measures are needed. If the adjacent habitat is determined to be occupied, vegetation removal and ground disturbance activities within 500 feet may only occur outside of the nesting season (i.e., September 1–February 14). 2. A pre-construction focused survey for Crotch’s bumble bee is recommended during the Crotch’s bumble bee active period (i.e., March to July) no more than one year prior to the start of construction. The survey will be a visual survey conducted by a Biologist. The Biologist will search for Crotch’s bumble bee activity and the presence of ground nests. If a ground nest is observed, it will be protected in place until it is no longer active as determined by a Biologist. 3. To avoid impacts to nesting birds and raptors, initiation of construction should be scheduled between September 1 and February 14, which is outside the peak nesting season. If construction and/or vegetation removal must occur during the peak nesting season (i.e., February 15– August 31), a pre-construction nesting bird survey should be conducted by a qualified Biologist within 7 days prior to vegetation removal activities. If the Biologist finds an active nest within or adjacent to the construction area, the Biologist will identify an appropriate protective buffer zone around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species, the nature of the construction activity, and the amount of existing disturbance in the vicinity. In general, the Biologist should designate a buffer between 10 to 300 feet for common nesting birds and between 200 to 500 feet for nesting raptors. No construction activities will be allowed within the buffer until the nest is deemed to be no longer active by the Biologist to ensure compliance with California Fish and Game Code. 4. To avoid impacts on maternity roosting bats, tree removal should occur outside the bat maternity season (i.e., April through August). A pre-construction roost emergence survey will be conducted no more than one year prior to the start of construction by a qualified biologist. Trees and/or structures that are being used by roosting bats and those within 100 feet of an active roost may not be removed during the maternity season to avoid impacts on an active maternity roost, which may include juvenile bats that cannot fly. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 11 If you have any questions or comments, please contact Steve Norton at Steve.Norton@Psomas.com or 714.751.7373. Sincerely, Steve Norton Senior Biologist Enclosures: Exhibit 1 – Project Vicinity Exhibit 2 – Aerial Photograph Exhibit 3 – USGS Topographic Map Attachment A – Site Photographs R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Technical Reports\Constraints\Bio Constraints_Kindred Church-051921.docx Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 12 REFERENCES American Ornithological Society (AOS). 2018 (October). Checklist of North and Middle American Birds (7th ed., as revised through 58th Supplement). Washington, D.C.: AOU. http://checklist.aou.org/. Bradley, RD, Ammerman, LK, Baker, RJ, Bradley, LC, Cook, JA, Dowler, RC, Jones, C, Schmidly, DJ, Stangl, Jr., FB, Van Den Bussche,RA, and Würsig, B. 2014 (October 2). Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, 2014. Texas Tech University Natural Science Research Laboratory, Occasional Papers (Number 327). Lubbock, TX: Museum of Texas Tech University. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2021a (March 10, date accessed). California Natural Diversity Database. Records of Occurrence for the USGS Black Star Canyon, Prado Dam, Orange, and Yorba Linda 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CDFW, Natural Heritage Division. ———. 2021b (April). Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Sacramento, CA: CDFW, Natural Heritage Division. ———. 2021c (April). Special Animals List. Sacramento, CA: CDFW, Natural Heritage Division. ———. 2020 (September). California Natural Communities List. Natural Communities List Arranged Alphabetically by Life Form (PDF). Sacramento, CA: CDFW Biogeographic Data Branch. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=153398&inline. California Department of Fish and Wildlife and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (CDFW and Attorney General). 2018 (November 29). Advisory Affirming California’s Protections for Migratory Birds. Sacramento, CA: CDFW. https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press- docs/20181129mbta-advisory3.pdf. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2021a (March 10, date accessed). A Manual of California Vegetation, Online Edition. Sacramento, CA: CNPS. http://www.cnps.org/cnps/vegetation/. ———. 2021b (March 10, date accessed). Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8- 03). Records of Occurrence for the USGS Black Star Canyon, Prado Dam, Orange, and Yorba Linda 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CNPS. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. Crother, B.I. (Ed.). 2017 (September). Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 43:1– 102. https://ssarherps.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/8th-Ed-2017-Scientific-and-Standard- English-Names.pdf Department of the Interior, Office of the Solicitor (DOI). 2017 (December 22). The Migratory Bird Treaty Act Does Not Prohibit Incidental Take. Washington, D.C.: DOI. https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/m-37050.pdf. Jepson Flora Project. 2019 (December, Revision 7). Jepson eFlora. Berkeley, CA: The Jepson Herbarium. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/. Andy Uk May 19, 2020 Page 13 Personal Communication (Pers. Comm.). 2021 (March 11). Onsite conversation with Dave Mitchell, Director of Facilities for Kindred Church. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Pacific Southwest Region. 2009 (December 31). Orange County Central Coastal NCCP/HCP. Conservation Biology Institute via Databasin website: https://databasin.org/datasets/ed49d8389c2349f2a0c9e56cfc7c48ef/ UV91 UV241 La Palma Av e de BryantS e r r a n o A v eWei r C a n y o n R d Santa Ana Canyon Rd Kodiak Mountain DrGypsum Canyon RdWei r C a n y o n R d At and SF Ra i l r o a d Chino Hills State Park Chino Hills State Park Featherly Regional Park Featherly Regional Park Toyon Park East Side Community Park Sycamore Park Box Canyon Park Brush Canyon Park Weir Canyon Regional Park Jean Woodard Park Bryant Ranch Elementary School Running Springs Elem School D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\Bio\ex_Vicinity_20210512.mxd² Seal Beach Project Location §¨605 ST241 ST90 ST261 ST142ST72 ST60 ST71 ST55 ST57 ST241 Los AngelesOrange BeachHuntington West Covina Buena Park Yorba Linda Costa Mesa Irvine Westminster Santa Ana Santa Corona Rancho Margarita Whittier Ontario Vicinity Map Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Exhibit 1 (Rev: 05/12/2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\ex_Vicinity.pdf 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet Project Boundary Aerial Photograph Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Exhibit 2 (Rev: 05/12/2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\ex_Aerial.pdf ParkingLot 1 ParkingLot 2 ParkingLot 3 ParkingLot 4 ParkingLot 5 Santa Ana Canyon Rd EWindso n g Dr C e d a r P o i n t Dr CrownviewWay G a rd e n V ie w D rE F o x h o l l o w Dr UV91 D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\ex_Aerial_20210505.mxd300 0 300150 Feet² Aerial Source: ESRI, Maxar 2020 Project Boundary Off-Site Percolation Area Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) PRADO DAM QUADRANGLE BLACK STAR CANYON QUADRANGLE D:\Projects\3ANA\009402\MXD\Bio\ex_USGS_20210512.mxd 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet² Source: USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Blackstar Canyon Township: 03S Range: 08W Section: 33 Project Boundary USGS Topographic Map (Rev: 5-12-2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\ex_USGS.pdf Exhibit 3 ATTACHMENT A SITE PHOTOGRAPHS Site Photographs Attachment A-1 Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Photo of the project site boundary on the west side of Parking Lot 2 facing south. The shrubby vegetation along in the center of the photograph and into the background is characteristic of the lemonade berry scrub stands adjacent to the project site. (05/12/2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\Att_SP.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\Bio\Att_SP1_20210512.aiPhoto of Parking Lot 1 facing west. The large, onsite, ornamental tree vegetation occurs throughout the site. The hills in the background are comprised of the fennel fields adjacent to the project site. Site Photographs Attachment A-2 Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Photo of the coast live oak forest and associated drainage feature located along the eastern boundary of the project site. This will not be impacted as part of the proposed project. (05/12/2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\Att_SP.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\Bio\Att_SP2_20210512.aiPhoto of Parking Lot 1 facing south. View of the ornamental vegetation on the manufactured slopes located south of the project site. Site Photographs Attachment A-3 Kindred Church Expansion Project (City of Anaheim) Photo of the roadside ditch located along the northern boundary of the project site south of East Santa Ana Canyon Road. (05/12/2021 MMD) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Graphics\Bio\Att_SP.pdfD:\Projects\3ANA\009402\GRAPHICS\Bio\Att_SP3_20210512.aiPhoto of the man-made pond located at Parking Lot 3 (feature to be removed). The feature is regularly drained and chlorinated. Appendix C Energy Calculations Energy Use Summary Construction Phase (gallons/construction period)Gasoline Diesel Construction Vehicles 17 3,981 Worker Trips 3,964 16 Vendor Trips 734 10 Haul Trucks 1 1,002 Total 4,716 5,009 Operations Phase (gallons/year) Gasoline Diesel Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Electricity (kWh/yr) Church 10,530 129 0 152,255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Land Uses 10,530 129 0 152,255 Operations Onroad Energy UseYear2022Vehicle TypesMPG by Fuel TypePopulation by Fuel TypeGAS DSL ELEC GAS DSL ELEC TotalLDA30.8 48.7 6,542,832 58,938 127,5336,601,770 LDT126.5 22.6 736,906 387 5,339737,293 LDT224.7 35.7 2,246,303 14,235 22,5902,260,537 LHDT1 10.5 21.6 175,903 119,381295,284 LHDT29.2 19.5 30,010 47,33677,346 MCY36.4295,960295,960 MDV20.0 27.4 1,579,640 33,349 11,6581,612,989 MH5.2 10.6 35,098 12,75947,857 MHDT5.1 10.7 25,445 123,310148,755 HHDT4.2 6.7 78 108,362108,440 OBUS5.0 8.5 5,959 4,27410,234 SBUS9.1 7.6 2,631 6,6319,262 UBUS4.9 6.0 952 14 17966 Trips/DayTrips/dayTrips/dayTrips/dayTotalVMT/dayVMT/dayVMT/dayTrip LengthLand UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayWeeklyWeekdaySaturdaySundayChurch 80.00 272.00 272.00944469 1,593 1,5935.86 Total80272272Fleet MixLand Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH TotalChurch0.6142150.0405860.2092520.12600500000.0015780.0012840.0050470.0010280.001005100.0%Vehicle TripsWeekday TripsLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHDT1LHDT2MHDTHHDTObusUbusMCYSbusMHTotalDaily VMTChurch49 3 17 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 468.57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Total493171000000000080Saturday TripsLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHDT1LHDT2MHDTHHDTObusUbusMCYSbusMHTotalDaily VMTChurch167 11 57 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 272 1,593.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Total167115734000000100272Sunday TripsLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHDT1LHDT2MHDTHHDTObusUbusMCYSbusMHTotalDaily VMTChurch167 11 57 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 272 1,593.14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Total167115734000000100272Gallons of FuelGasolineLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHDT1LHDT2MHDTHHDObusUbusMCYSbusMHTotalChurch 5,674 441 2,424 1,774 0 0 0 0 52 75 40 9 41 10,5300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05,674 441 2,424 1,774 0 0 0 0 52 75 40 9 4110,530Total Gallons GasolineDieselLDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV OBUS LHDT2 MHDT HHD Obus Ubus MCY Sbus MH TotalChurch32 0 11 27 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 28 7 1290 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 032 0 11 27 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 28 7129Total Gallons Diesel10,659Total Gallons of Diesel and Gasoline Offroad Construction Equipment Energy UsePhaseName OffRoadEquipmentTypeOffRoadEquipmentUnitAmountUsageHours HorsePower Load Factor Horsepower Category Num Days YearFuel Consumption Rate (gal/hour) Fuel TypeTotal Fuel Consumption (gal/construction period)Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 0 0 81 0.73 100 5020214.7 Gasoline 0Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 300 50 2021 4.5 Diesel 714Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 97 0.37 100 50 2021 1.6 Diesel 705Grading Graders0 0 187 0.41 175 30 2021 3.1 Diesel 0Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 247 0.4 300 30 2021 4.5 Diesel 429Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 97 0.37 100 30 2021 1.6 Diesel 370Building Construction Cranes1 8 231 0.29 300 100 2021 3.3 Diesel 763Building Construction Forklifts0 0 89 0.2 100 100 2021 2.0 Diesel 0Building Construction Generator Sets 0 0 84 0.74 100 100 2021 5.2 Gasoline 0Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6 97 0.37 100 100 2021 1.6 Diesel 705Building Construction Welders0 0 46 0.45 50 100 2021 2.4 Gasoline 0Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8 9 0.56 25 10 2021 0.4 Gasoline 17Paving Pavers1 8 130 0.42 100 10 2021 1.7 Diesel 58Paving Paving Equipment 1 8 132 0.36 100 10 2021 1.6 Diesel 47Paving Rollers2 8 80 0.38 100 10 2021 1.7 Diesel 103Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 97 0.37 100 10 2021 1.6 Diesel 47Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 78 0.48 100 10 2021 1.3 Diesel 38TotalGasoline17 TotalDiesel3,981 Onroad Construction Energy UseYear2021Vehicle TypesMPG by Fuel TypePopulation by Fuel TypeGASDSLELECGASDSLELECTotalLDA 30.0 47.56,444,755 55,086 107,4076,499,841 LDT1 25.8 22.3715,053 416 3,766715,469 LDT2 23.8 34.72,207,489 12,809 17,0832,220,298 LHDT1 10.4 21.2176,982 113,082290,064 LHDT2 9.1 19.229,883 44,61674,500 MCY 36.4286,161286,161 MDV 19.4 26.61,569,538 30,444 7,4471,599,981 MH5.1 10.535,587 12,38647,973 MHDT 5.0 10.425,313 122,609147,922 HHDT 4.0 6.682 106,417106,499 OBUS 5.0 8.25,971 4,25010,222 SBUS 9.1 7.52,479 6,5899,067 UBUS 4.8 6.0944 14 17958 InputGasoline ConsumptionDiesel ConsumptionPhase NameWorker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip LengthWorker Vendor Haul Worker Vendor HaulDemolition 10 0 4 14.7 6.9 20Grading 10 0 325 14.7 6.9 20Building Construction 54 21 0 14.7 6.9 20Paving 15 0 0 14.7 6.9 20Architectural Coating 11 0 0 14.7 6.9 20AdjustedDemolition 500 0 4 14.7 6.9 20 307 0 0 1 0 12Grading 300 0 325 14.7 6.9 20 184 0 1 1 0 989Building Construction 5400 2100 0 14.7 6.9 20 3,313 734 0 13 10 0Paving 150 0 0 14.7 6.9 20 92 0 0 0 0 0Architectural Coating 110 0 0 14.7 6.9 20 67 0 0 0 0 0Total3,964734116101,002 Appendix D Soils Report 3/16/2021, 9:18:25 AM OTH2020-01321 Cesar Morales November 10, 2020 Kindred Community Church 100 South Chaparral Court Anaheim, CA 92808 Geotechnical Environmental Hydrogeology Material Testing Construction Inspection Project No. 15-5382 Subject: Percolation Testing Results for WQMP, Pavement Design and Building Expansion Foundation Recommendations, Kindred Church, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California. In accordance with your request and authorization, TGR Geotechnical, Inc. (TGR) has completed a geotechnical investigation to provide infiltration rates from percolation testing, asphalt concrete pavement design and Fellowship Hall main church building expansion foundation recommendations at the subject site. It is our understanding that the proposed improvements consist of the expansion of the central and southern parking lots, installation of three infiltration basins and the expansion of the main church building. Based on our investigation the proposed improvements are feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations presented in this report are implemented during design and construction . SCOPE OF SERVICES Our scope of work included performing the following tasks : • Site reconnaissance. • Review of previous geotechnical reports for the subject site . • Percolation testing in three (3) locations to a depth of approximately 10.5 feet below existing grade. Percolation testing followed the Orange County Technical Guidance Document, Appendix VII. The borings were be backfilled with soil cuttings and soil was disposed on- site. • Sampling and logging two (2) hollow stem auger borings to a depth of approximately 5.5 feet below existing grade. The borings were backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion. Any excess soil was disposed onsite. • Laboratory testing of selected samples to include : in situ moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, shear, passing No. 200 sieve and R-Value. • Preparation of this report presenting the results of percolation testing, infiltration rate from the percolation testing, pavement design recommendations for the proposed parking lot and geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed church building expansion. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & 8(a ) firm 3037 S. HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA, CA92704 P 714.641 .7189 F 714.641.719□ www.lgrgeotech.com DEPARTMENT OF PUBllC WORKS DE.VELOPMEl.'IT SERVICES APPROVED Cesar Morales, Associate E ngineer 15-5382 Page 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION Field exploration was performed on October 13, 2020 by representatives from our firm who logged the borings and obtained representative samples , which were subsequently transported to the laboratory for further review and testing. The approximate locations of the borings are indicated on the enclosed Geotechnical Map (Plate 1 ). The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling , sampling, and logging two (2) borings with a truck mounted hollow stem drill rig to an approximate depth of five and one-half (5 .5) feet below existing grade and three (3) borings to ten and one-half (10.5) feet below existing grade for percolation testing. Subsequent to drilling, all borings were backfilled with soil cuttings and the surface was repaired with cold patch asphalt, where appropriate. The logs of borings presenting soil conditions and descriptions are provided as Plates 2 through 6. The drill rig was equipped with a sampling apparatus to allow for recovery of driven modified California Ring Sampler (CRS), 3-inch outside diameter, and 2.42-inch inside diameter samples. Driven samples and bulk samples of the earth materials encountered at selected intervals were recovered from the borings. The samples were driven using an automatic 140-pound hammer falling freely from a height of 30 inches. The blow counts for CRS were converted to equivalent SPT blow counts. Soil descriptions were entered on the logs in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The locations and depths of the soil samples recovered are indicated on the logs on Plates 2 through 6. PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation testing was performed at the subject site utilizing the Porchet Method. Presented below are the infiltration rates from the percolation tests performed at the subject site. These do not include any factor of safety. • P-1 at 0-10.5 feet • P-2 at 0-10.5 feet • P-3 at 0-10.5 feet 0.10 inches per hour 0.20 inches per hour 0.15 inches per hour The infiltration test rates were determined in general accordance with Orange County Public Works Technical Guidance Document (2011). LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples to verify the field classification of the recovered samples and to evaluate the geotechnical properties of the subsurface soils . The following tests were performed : • In-situ moisture content (ASTM D2216) and dry density (ASTM D7263); • Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D1557); • Direct Shear Strength (ASTM D3080); • Expansion Potential (ASTM D4829); • Passing No. 200 sieve (ASTM 1140); • R-Value Determination (CAL 301 ); and • Soluble Sulfate (CAL.417A). TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 3 Moisture and Density Determination Tests : Moisture content and dry density determinations were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings. The results of these tests are presented in the boring logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from "undisturbed" or disturbed samples. Maximum Density Tests : The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. The results of these tests are presented on Plate 7 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Maximum Dry Optimum Moisture Density (Pcf) Content(%) P-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 113.0 16.0 Direct Shear Tests : Direct shear test was performed on selected remolded and/or undisturbed sample , which was soaked for a minimum of 24 hours under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate for a period of approximately 1-hour prior to application of shearing force . The sample was tested under various normal loads , a motor-driven, strain-controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of less than 0.001 to 0.5 inches per minute (depending upon the soil type). The test results are presented on Plate 8 and in the table below: Sample Sample Description Friction Angle Apparent Location (degrees) Cohesion (psf) P-2 @ 0-5 feet Remolded Shear -Clayey Sand 26 462 Expansion Index Tests : The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, ASTM D4829 . Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Expansion Expansion Index Potential P-1 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 64 Medium Wash Sieve Test: Typical materials were washed over No. 200 sieve (ASTM Test Method D1140). The test results are presented below: TGR GEOTECHNICAL DB E & B(a) fi rm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com Sample Location % Passing No. 200 Sieve P-1 @4 feet 45 .5% P-1 @9 feet 46 .1% 15-5382 Page4 P-2@4 feet 53.0% P-2@9 feet 59.0% P-3@4 feet 33 .9% P-3@9 feet 43.5% R-Value : The resistance "R "-Value was determined by the California Materials Method No. 301 for sub-grade soils. For the representative sample exudation pressure and "R "-Value was determined. The graphically determined "R "-Value at exudation pressure of 300 psi is summarized on Plates 9 and 10 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample description R-Value P-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 12 Soluble Sulfates : The soluble sulfate content of selected sample was determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented on Plate 11 and in the table below: Sample Water Soluble Sulfate Exposure Location Sample Description Sulfate in Soil, Content Class* (% by Weight) (ppm) B-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 0.0173 173 so * Based on the current version of ACI 318-14 Build ing Code, Table No . 19.3.1.1; Exposure Categories and Classes. EXISTING SITE CONDITION The subject site consists of a Fellowship Hall church building and Workshop Center in the southeast portion of the property , a parking lot, nature walk and lake in the central portion of the property and Educational portable buildings in the southwest portion of the property. The Fellowship Hall and Workshop Center were constructed on compacted artificial fill overlaying bedrock, designated as structural areas , while the remaining portions of the site are underlain by compacted artificial fill overlaying landslide debris and/or debris fill. Total removals of landslide material were made in the area of the above-mentioned structural pad in order to provide a buttress for the ascending slope to the south of the site. The approximate depth of the landslide debris in this area appears to have been in the 60 to 100 feet range. The limits of the buttress fill key extend to the north of the structural pad area approximately 60 to 100 feet. It appears that the northern limits of the structural pad are based on a 1: 1 (horizontal : vertical) projection from the base of the landslide debris removals/toe of the fill key to the surface. The limits of the landslide debris removals and structural pad are presented on Plate 1. The thickness of the remaining landslide debris to the north of the structural pad area is unknown since the mass grading plan review report for the site and surrounding areas was not available for review. However, based on the estimated depth of the removals of landslide debris TGR GEOTECHNICAL DB E & B(a) fi rm 3037 S. HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 714 .641 .7189 F 7 14 .641 .7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 5 in the structural pad area we anticipate the thickness of the remaining landslide debris to the north to be similar in depth, ranging from 60 to 100 feet. The thickness of the landslide debris on the west side of the site is also unknown since the mass grading plan review report for the site and surrounding areas was not available for review. However, based on our review of the CDMG report, the landslides on the west side of the site are similar in size to the landslides on the south side of the side . As such, we would anticipate that the thickness of the landslide debris on the west side of the site to be similar to that of the landslide debris on the south side. The existing Fellowship Hall main church building was constructed in the structural fill area with foundations supported on two to three feet of remedially compacted engineered fill within the structural fill. FINDINGS Regional Geologic Setting The subject site is located in the Anaheim Hills region, south of the Santa Ana River, within the northwestern portion of the Black Star Canyon 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County, California. Per the geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' Quadrangles (Morton, 2006) the subject site is underlain by Quaternary alluvial deposits and possible mid- Miocene marine strata toward southern portions of the site (Figure 2). Existing Soil Based on our subsurface investigation, the subject site subsurface soils generally consist of tan to brown clayey sand and sandy clay in a moist condition to the maximum depth explored, 10.5 feet below existing grade. In the existing parking lot, in the vicinity of Borings 8-1 and 8-2, the clayey sand and sandy clay is underlain by blue grey and olive brown silty sand in a moist condition at a depth of 4 feet to 5.5 feet below existing grade. Detailed descriptions of the earth units encountered in our borings are presented in the log of the borings on Plates 2 through 6. Groundwater Subsurface water was not encountered during the exploration to a maximum depth of 10.5 feet below existing ground surface . Based on our review of available historical groundwater information for the Black Star Canyon 7.5-minute Quadrangle (CDMG, 2000) regional groundwater has been mapped in the general site area between approximately 20 to 40 feet below ground surface (Figure 3). Seasonal and long-term fluctuations in the groundwater may occur as a result of variations in subsurface conditions, rainfall, run-off conditions and other factors. Therefore, variations from our observations may occur. Static groundwater is not anticipated to impact the proposed development. Expansive Soil Onsite soils have an expansion index of 64 correlating to a "medium" expansion potential. The recommendations provided in this report account for the expansion potential of the onsite soils . TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page6 RECOMMENDATIONS Seismic Design Parameters When reviewing the 2019 California Building Code the following data should be incorporated into the design. Parameter Value Latitude (degree) 33.8635 Longitude (degree) -117.7224 Site Class D -Stiff Soil Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv N/A Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period, Ss 1.927 g Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period, S1 0.679 g Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period Adjusted for Site Class, SMs 1.927 g Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period Adjusted for Site Class , SM1 N/A Design Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period, Sos 1.284 g Design Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period, So1 N/A Site Specific Response Spectra The USGS Unified Hazard tool, the USGS RTGM Calculator and the USGS App for Deterministic Spectra Acceleration were utilized to develop site specific ground motion spectra . The analysis was performed utilizing the following attenuation relationships that are part of NGA as required by 2019 CBC code requirements. • Campbell & Bozorgnia (2014) • Boore, Stewart, Seyhan & Atkinson (2014) • Chiou & Youngs (2014) • Abrahamson, Silva & Kamal (2014) The results of the Site Specific Response Spectra are incorporated in Tables 1 through 3 and on Figure 1 in Appendix B. The results include deterministic spectra at 5% damping , maximum rotated component at 0.84 fractile and the probabilistic spectra , maximum rotated component at 5% damping for a return period of 2475 year and subsequently multiplied by risk coefficient to obtain the MCER probabilistic spectral acceleration. The Vs30 utilized was 260 mis. The above generated spectral accelerations were compared against the minimum code requirements in ASCE7-16 (Chapters 11 and 21) resulting in the final design response spectra which is presented in Table 1 and on Figure 1 in Appendix B. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 7 Based on Tables 1 through 3 and Figure 1, the recommended Site Specific Sos and So1 are as follows : Sos= 1.256 So1 = 1.102 The structural consultant should review the above parameters and the 2019 California Building Code to evaluate the seismic design . Conformance to the criteria presented in the above table for seismic design does not constitute any type of guarantee or assurance that significant structural damage or ground failure will not occur during a large earthquake event. The intent of the code is "life safety" and not to completely prevent damage of the structure , since such design may be economically prohibitive . Pavement Design Based on our field investigation and laboratory testing , presented below are the Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement design recommendations for the proposed new central parking lot the expansion of the southern parking lot. The pavement section recommendations are based on the tested R-value of 12 for the anticipated pavement subgrade soils and assumed traffic index. The traffic indices shall be approved by the project civil engineer and the reviewing agency . Assumed Asphalt Total Pavement Utilization Traffic Concrete Base (Inches) Thickness Index (Inches) (inches) Parking Stalls 4.5 3.0 8.0 11 .0 Drive Aisles 5.0 4.0 7.0 11.0 Aggregate base material for Asphalt Concrete Pavement should consist of CAB/CMB complying with the specifications in Section 200-2.2/200-2.4 of the current "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction " and should be compacted to at least ninety-five (95) percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). The surface of the aggregate base should exhibit a firm and unyielding condition just prior to the placement of asphalt concrete paving. The pavement subgrade should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM D1557) to a minimum depth of one (1) foot. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The R-value and the associated pavement section should be confirmed at the completion of site grading Church Building Expansion Foundation Design Recommendations The proposed Fellowship Hall expansions are located to the northeast and southwest of the existing structure within the area of structural fill , shown on Plate 1. The proposed main church building expansion may be supported on continuous and/or spread footings . Bearing capacity recommendations for shallow foundations are presented below. These recommendations assume that the footings will be supported on a minimum of one (1) foot of engineered fill. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 8 For foundations supported on one (1) foot of engineered fill with minimum ninety (90) percent relative compaction an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used in design. All shallow foundations should extend a minimum of twenty-four (24) inches below the lowest adjacent grade. The minimum recommended footing width is eighteen (18) inches for continuous footing and eighteen (18) inches for pad footing . A minimum reinforcement of two (2) No. 4 steel bar top and two (2) No . 4 steel bar bottom is required for continuous footings from a geotechnical viewpoint. Foundation design details such as concrete strength, reinforcements, etc should be established by the Structural Engineer. A one-third (1/3) increase on the aforementioned bearing pressure may be used in design for short-term wind or seismic loads . The total and differential static and seismic settlement is anticipated to be 1-inch and 0.5-inches over 30 feet or less. Resistance to lateral loads including wind and seismic forces may be provided by frictional resistance between the bottom of concrete and the underlying fill soils and by passive pressure against the sides of the foundations . A coefficient of friction of 0.33 may be used between concrete foundation and underlying soil. The recommended passive pressure of the engineered fill may be taken as an equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (2,500 psf max). Any footing excavation adjacent to existing continuous footings may require slot cutting (A-B-C slots). As an alternative, shoring or underpinning of existing footings is recommended. All foundations excavations shall be approved prior to placement of concrete by the geotechnical consultant. Additional recommendations may be provided if unusual conditions were observed/encountered during excavation Slab-On-Grade Slab-on-grade should be a minimum of 5-inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of No . 4 reinforcing bar on 12-inch centers in two horizontally perpendicular directions . Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The slab should not be structurally connected to the buildings. The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM 1557) to a minimum depth of two (2) feet. Prior to placement of concrete , the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The actual thickness and reinforcement of the slab shall be designed by the structural engineer and should include the anticipated loading condition and the anticipated use of the building. For moisture sensitive flooring, the floor slab should be underlain by minimum 15-mil impermeable polyethylene membrane (Stego Wrap, Moistop Plus, or any equivalent meeting the requirements of ASTM E1745 , Class A rating) as a capillary break. Sand/gravel/aggregate base may be placed above and below the impermeable polyethylene membrane at the discretion of the project structural engineer/concrete contractor for proper curing and finish of the concrete slab-on-grade and protection of the membrane and is considered outside the scope of geotechnical engineering. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 9 Due to the presence of medium expansive soils , more than normal movement of the flatwork is anticipated. This may be limited by placing a thickened edge (minimum 12-inches) and/or 6- inches of base under the flatwork. The slab-on-grade foundation shall comply with section 1808.6.2 of the CBC (2019) and shall be designed in accordance with WRI/CRSI Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundations. As an alternate the slab-on-grade shall be supported on minimum 2 feet of non-expansive soil to reduce the impact of expansive soils . Flatwork Flatwork should be a minimum of 4-inches thick should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 reinforcing bar on 18-inch centers in two horizontally perpendicular directions. Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM D1557) to a minimum depth of one (1) foot. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The actual thickness and reinforcement of the slab shall be designed by the structural engineer and should include the anticipated loading condition . Due to the presence of medium expansive soils, more than normal movement of the flatwork is anticipated. This may be limited by placing a thickened edge (minimum 12-inches) and/or 6- inches of base under the flatwork. Cement Type and Corrosion Concrete used should be designed in accordance with the provisions of ACI 318-14 , Chapter 19 for Exposure Class SO with a minimum unconfined compressive strength of 2,500 ps i. TGR does not practice corrosion engineering . If needed, a qualified specialist should review the site conditions and evaluate the corrosion potential of the site soil to the proposed improvements and to provide the appropriate corrosion mitigations for the project. Expansion Potential Soils onsite have an expansion index of 64, which correlates to a "medium" expansion potential. The slab-on-grade foundation shall comply with section 1808.6.2 of the CBC (2019) and shall be designed in accordance with WRI/CRSI Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundations. As an alternate the slab-on-grade shall be supported on minimum 2 feet of non-expansive soil to reduce the impact of expansive soils. Site Development Recommendations Earthwork and Demolition Within the proposed development and demolition area , all foundations , slab-on-grade , vaults , utility lines , surface vegetation, trash, demolition debris , asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete should be cleared and removed from the proposed site . Depressions resulting from the removal of objects encountered as mentioned above should be backfilled with properly compacted engineered fill under the testing and observation of the geotechnical consultant of record. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 10 During earthwork construction, all site preparation and the general procedures of the contractor should be observed, and the fill and base selectively tested by a representative of TGR. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered . Grading All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in the California Building Code (2019 edition), except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading, TGR's representative should be present at the pre-construction meeting to provide grading guidelines, if needed, and review any earthwork. At a minimum, the upper two (2) feet of soil under slab-on-grade, one (1) foot of soil under footings, flatwork and asphalt concrete pavement should be removed and replaced as engineered fill , compacted to minimum 90 percent relative compaction and moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content per ASTM D1557. Site soils could be reused as engineered fill provided the recommendations presented in this report are implemented. Exposed bottoms should be scarified a minimum of 8-inches, moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Subsequently, site fill soils should be re-compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction at 120 percent optimum moisture content. The depth of over-excavation should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant during the actual construction. Any subsurface obstruction buried structural elements, and unsuitable material encountered during grading, should be immediately brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Consultant for proper exposure, removal and processing, as recommended. Fill Placement Prior to any fill placement TGR should observe the exposed surface soils. The site soils may be re-used as engineered fill provided they are free of organic content and particle size greater than 4-inches. Fill shall be moisture-conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent in accordance with ASTM D1557 . Any import soils shall be non-expansive and approved by TGR Geotechnical Inc. Compaction Prior to fill placement, the exposed surface should be scarified to a minimum depth of eight (8) inches, fill placed in eight (8) inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Temporary Excavation and Shoring Temporary construction excavations may be anticipated during the proposed development. Site soils may be cut vertically without shoring to a depth of approximately four (4) feet below adjacent surrounding grade . For deeper cuts, the slopes should be properly shored or the entire excavation sloped back to at least 1.5H : 1 V (Horizontal : Vertical) or flatter. The exposed slope face should be kept moist (but not saturated) during construction to reduce local sloughing. No surcharge loads should be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut from the toe of excavation unless the cut is properly shored. Excavations that extend below an TGR GEOTECHNICAL DB E & B(a) fi rm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,64 1,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com 15-5382 Page 11 imaginary plane inclined at 45 degrees below the edge of any nearby adjacent existing site facilities should be properly shored to maintain foundation support at the adjacent structures. Any excavation adjacent to existing continuous footings may require slot cutting (A-B-C slots). Geotechnical Review of Plans All grading plans and specifications should be reviewed and accepted by the geotechnical consultant before they are finalized to determine if the geotechnical and/or geologic information have been properly implemented. If this firm is not granted the privilege of reviewing the plans and specifications, this firm is not responsible for misinterpretation of the recommendations given in this report. Geotechnical Observation/Testing During Construction Per sections 1705.6 and table 1705.6 of the 2019 California Building Code, periodic special inspection shall be performed to : • Verify materials below shallow foundations are adequate to achieve the design bearing capacity; • Verify excavations are extended to the proper depth and have reached proper material; • Verify classification and test compacted materials; and • Prior to placement of compacted fill, inspect subgrade and verify that the site has been prepared properly Per sections 1705.6 and table 1705.6 of the 2019 California Building Code, continuous special inspection shall be performed to : • Verify use of proper materials, densities and lift thickness during placement and compaction of compacted fill. The geotechnical consultant should also perform observation and/or testing at the following stages : • During any grading and fill placement; • During utility trench excavation and backfill; • After foundation excavation and prior to placing concrete; • During placement of aggregate base and asphalt paving; • When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during any construction operation subsequent to issuance of this report. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Kindred Community Church and their design consultants relative to developing the subject site. No portion of this report may be used by other parties or for other purposes. Unauthorized use of or reliance on this report constitutes an agreement to defend and indemnify TGR from and against any liability which may arise as a result of such use or reliance, regardless of any fault, negligence, or strict liability of TGR. TGR GEOTECHNICAL DB E & B(a) fi rm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 714 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com TGR GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 15-5382 Page 12 TGR considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this report. This report has not been prepared for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties. This report was necessarily based in part upon data obtained from a limited number of observances, site visits, soil and/or other samples, tests, analyses , histories of occurrences, spaced subsurface exploration and limited information on historical events and observations . Such information is necessarily incomplete. Variations can be experienced within small distances and under various climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. If you have any questions regarding this report , please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, I Sanjay Govil , PhD , PE , GE 2382 Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments : Figure 1 -Site Location Map Figure 2 -Regional Geology Map Edward L. Burrows , M.S, PG , CEG 1750 Principal Engineering Geologist Figure 3 -Historic High Groundwater Map Plate 1 -Geotechnical Map Plates 2 through 6 -Boring Logs Plate 7 -Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Plate 8 -Direct Shear Test Results Plates 9 and 10 -R-Value Test Results Plate 11 -Analytical Report for Soluble Sulfates Table 1 -Percolation Test Worksheet Appendix A -References Appendix B -Site Seismic Design and De-Aggregated Parameters Distribution : (1) Addressee TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com SITE LOCATION MAPKINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIAFIGURE 1PROJECT NO. 15-5382SITE Morton, D.M., and Miller, F.K., 2006, Geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' quadrangles, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report OF-2006-1217, scale 1:100,000.FIGURE 2PROJECT NO. 15-5382REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAPKINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIASITE FIGURE 3PROJECT NO. 15-5382Modified From: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 2000, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Black Star Canyon 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California, Report 046.HISTORIC HIGH GROUNDWATER MAPKINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIASITEONE MILE 18% "'""""~' D Environmental Hydrogeology Material Testing Constructlon Inspection I Boret,ole Si{€! ~ .Jo ~ Depth to !JfCJUnd wa.1"er in fee~ ~ Project GEOTECHNICAL MAPGEOTECHNICAL BORINGPERCOLATION BORINGP-3P-2P-1B-1B-2APPROXIMATE (PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, 1997)NON STRUCTURAL FILLNON STRUCTURAL FILLNON STRUCTURAL FILLTtQafQlsQafQlsQafQlsQafAPPROXIMATE FELLOWSHIP HALL EXPANSION..... ------:::.= Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled : Ground Elev: LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING B -1 15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 -10/13/20 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive wt & Drop: RA SG Hollow Stem 140Ibs / 30in Sheet 1 of 1 FIELD RESULTS LAB RESULTS Cl 0 ,:;: ...I C.2 .!:! Cl>~ ,:;: Cl a. e! Cl .... :.•:. • .. '. -5 _ _. .·.• .. ti ~-10 -::c (.) w ti w (!) a: (!) f- --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c < ~ ::c (.) a: ::, ::c (.) Cl w a: Cl z S2 ij "' . ·: .· ... ~.i ~- Q) z Q) !!::-C. C. 1/) C: E E ~~ cu cu 0 CU (J) (J) :c .2: .>' Q) I-::, "5 > a. g en ;§ (J) ~ -3. ~ 34 ~ 41 C: Q) a. (J) -c u Q) 1/) (J) ~~ ::> 0 a. SC SM ■ Shelby Tube ~ Modified ~ California ~ Standard 161 Split Spoon y_ Water Table -ATD Surface is 2 inches of asphalt over 12 inches of base. ~ No recovery Gravelly Sand-grey brown , moist, medium dense, fine to medium grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel. Sand and Clay-grey brown sand , blue grey clay , moist, dense, fine to coarse grained sand, some gravel and clasts . Silty Sand-blue grey and brown , moist, dense, fine grained sand with trace coarse. Total Depth : 5.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling . No caving observed . Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion . 15 117 14 118 ~ 1/) a>-,:;: 1/) -Q) 01- ~--------...... _ ...... ___ ......_ ________________________________________ --I ~ This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete ,:.• .. ~ geotechnical report . This Boring Log represents conditions observed p LATE 2 • o at the specific location and date indicated , it is not warranted to be ..: 'J a, (!) representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. TGR GE OTE CH NI CAL, IN C. g ________________________________________________ _ Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled : Ground Elev: LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING B -2 15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 -10/13/20 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive wt & Drop: RA SG Hollow Stem 140Ibs / 30in Sheet 1 of 1 FIELD RESULTS LAB RESULTS ,:;: C.2 Cl>~ Cl Cl 0 Q) ...I C. .!:! E ,:;: cu a. (J) e! .>' Cl "5 en :":\:.-- ·::- :.•:. • .. '. -5 -······- ti ~-10 -::c (.) w ti w (!) a: (!) f- --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c < ~ ::c (.) a: ::, ::c (.) Cl w a: Cl z S2 ij "' .·: ... ~.i ~- Q) z !!::-C. 1/) C: E ~~ cu 0 CU (J) :c .2: Q) I-::, > a. g ;§ (J) ~ -3. 25 27 C: Q) a. (J) -c u Q) 1/) (J) ~~ ::> 0 a. SC SM ■ Shelby Tube ~ Modified ~ California ~ Standard 161 Split Spoon y_ Water Table -ATD Surface is 3 inches over 4 inches of base. ~ No recovery Clayey Sand-brown , very moist, med ium dense, fine grained , some fine to coarse grained gravel. ... Same as above, blue grey clay. Silty Sand-olive brown , moist, medium dense, fine grained , some coarse. Total Depth : 5.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling . No caving observed . Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion . 18 113 14 115 ~ 1/) a>-,:;: 1/) -Q) 01- S04 ~-_ ...... ___________________________ ....,. _______ ....,. ___________________ .....__---I ~ This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete ,:.• .. ~ geotechnical report . This Boring Log represents conditions observed p LATE 3 • o at the specific location and date indicated , it is not warranted to be ..: 'J a, (!) representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. TGR GE OTE CH NI CAL, IN C. g ________________________ ......, _______ ......, _______________ _ LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P -1 Sheet 1 of 1 --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c < ~ ::c (.) a: ::::, ::c (.) Cl w a: Cl z S2 ij "' Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled : Ground Elev: 15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 -10/13/20 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive wt & Drop: RA SG Hollow Stem 140Ibs / 30in FIELD RESULTS Cl Q) z 0 Q) !!::-,:;: ...I C. C. 1/) C: C.2 .!:! E E ~~ Cl>~ ,:;: cu cu 0 CU Cl a. (J) (J) :c .2: e! .>' Q) I-::::, Cl "5 > a. g en ;§ (J) ~ -3. ).'\ fy_-. 46 53 C: Q) a. (J) -c u Q) 1/) (J) ~~ ::> 0 a. SC SC ■ Shelby Tube ~ Modified ~ California ~ Standard 161 Split Spoon y_ Water Table -ATD ~ No recovery Surface is a planter with 6 inches of mulch and topsoil. Clayey Sand with Gravel-tan, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand , fine to coarse grained gravel. Clayey Sand-tan brown , very moist, dense, some fine grained gravel and clasts, orange oxidation . ... Same as above, very dense, some blue grey sand . Organic Clay-black, moist, hard , some fine grained gravel, pieces of r-. organic material. Total Depth : 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. r LAB RESULTS ~ 1/) a>-,:;: 1/) -Q) 01- 18 110 -200= 45.5% 10 123 -200= 46.1% ~-------------------~-----------------------------------------1 ~ This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete ,:.• .. ~ geotechnical report . This Boring Log represents conditions observed p LATE 4 • o at the specific location and date indicated , it is not warranted to be ..: 'J a, (!) representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. TGR GE OTE CH NI CAL, IN C. g ________________________________________________ _ LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P -2 Sheet 1 of 1 ti Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled : Ground Elev: 15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 -10/13/20 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive wt & Drop: RA SG Hollow Stem 140Ibs / 30in FIELD RESULTS Cl Q) z 0 Q) !!::-...I C. C. 1/) C: .!:! E E ~~ .s::: cu cu 0 CU a. Cl) Cl) :c .2: e! .>' Q) I-::, Cl "5 > a. g en ;§ Cl) ~ -3. - 51 -5 -- v C: Q) a. Cl) -c u Q) 1/) Cl) ~~ ::> 0 a. :L-MI CLS ■ Shelby Tube ~ Modified ~ California ~ Standard 161 Split Spoon y_ Water Table -ATD Surface is a dirt and vegetation area. ~ No recovery Clayey Sand-tan , moist, medium dense, fine grained sand , fine to coarse grained gravel and clasts. Clayey Silt and Sand-tan silt, dark grey clay , moist, hard , very fine grained sand, orange oxidation . Clayey Sand-brown , moist, dense, fine grained sand , fine to coarse grained gravel. Sandy Clay-tan , very moist, dense, fine grained sand , orange oxidation . ~ -10 -· ~ 46 ::c (.) w ti w (!) a: (!) f- --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c < ~ ::c (.) a: ::, ::c (.) Cl w a: Cl z S2 ij "' Total Depth : 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing . Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. LAB RESULTS ~ 1/) a>-.s::: 1/) -Q) 01- Max , l~-ValuE , Shear, El 16 110 -200= 53.0% 18 106 -200= 59.0% ~--------...... _ ...... ___ ......_ ________________________________________ --I ~ This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete ,:.• .. ~ geotechnical report . This Boring Log represents conditions observed p LATE 5 • o at the specific location and date indicated , it is not warranted to be ..: 'J a, (!) representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. TGR GE OTE CH NI CAL, IN C. g ________________________________________________ _ LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P -3 Sheet 1 of 1 --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c < ~ ::c (.) a: ::::, ::c (.) Cl w a: Cl z S2 ij "' Project Number: 15-5382 Logged By: Project Name: Date Drilled : Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 -10/13/20 Project Engineer: Drill Type: RA SG Hollow Stem 140Ibs / 30in Ground Elev: FIELD RESULTS Cl Q) z 0 Q) !!::-C: ,:;: ...I C. C. 1/) C: Q) C.2 .!:! E E ~~ a. (J) Cl>~ ,:;: cu cu 0 CU -c u Cl a. (J) (J) :c .2: Q) 1/) (J) e! .>' Q) I-::::, ~~ ::> Cl "5 > a. g 0 en ;§ (J) ~ a. -3. ).'\ fy_-. ~ 22 SC ~ 29 SC ■ Shelby Tube ~ Modified ~ California Drive wt & Drop: ~ Standard 161 Split Spoon y_ Water Table -ATD Surface is a dirt and vegetation covered area. ~ No recovery Clayey Sand-tan, moist, medium dense, fine grained, fine to coarse pieces of caliche . ... Same as above, no caliche. Clayey Sand-light brown sand, blue grey clay, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel and clasts, orange oxidation . Total Depth : 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing . Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion. LAB RESULTS ~ 1/) a>-,:;: 1/) -Q) 01- 11 103 -200= 33 .9% 16 116 -200= 43.5% ~-------------------~-----------------------------------------1 ~ This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete ,:.• .. ~ geotechnical report . This Boring Log represents conditions observed p LATE 6 • o at the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to be ..: 'J a, (!) representative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. TGR GEOTECHNICAL , INC. g ________________________________________________ _ PLATE 7 0 li1 ~ ti (!) ::c u w ti w (!) a:: (!) f- --, Q. (!) ~ w ::c <( ~ ::c u a:: ::, ::c u Cl w a:: Cl z S2 ij "' z 0 ~ Q. ~ 0 u en ::, 135 130 125 120 115 110 '13 C. ► I- ci5 z 105 w 0 >-a:: 0 100 95 90 85 80 75 0 5 ... ~'jt, TGR GEOTECHNICAL, INC . \ ' \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Source of Material P - 2 0-5ft \ \ Description of Material Clayey Sand \ ' \ \ \ \ \ Test Method ASTM D1557 Method A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ .\ \ TEST RESULTS ■\ \ ' / \ \ \ Maximum Dry Density 113.0 PCF 41 • \ \ ' Optimum Water Content 16.0 % \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ ATTERBERG LIMITS \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LL PL Pl \ \ -- -- -- \ \ ' \ '\ \ \ \ \ Curves of 100% Saturation \ \ ' for Specific Gravity Equal to: \ \ \. \ \. 2.80 \ \ \ '\ \ 2.70 \ \ \. \ \ ' 2.60 \ \ \ \ ' \ '\ \. \ \ ' ' \ '\ \ \ ' \ ' \ '\ ' \ '\ \.. ' "-'\ .. \ \ ........ \ \ ....... ' "" \.. "" \ \.. \ \ \ \ \ 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 WATER CONTENT, % 3037 S. Harbor Blvd MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP Santa Ana, CA 92704 Project Number: 15-5382 Telephone: 714-641-7189 Fax: 714-641-7190 Project Name: Kindred Community Church, Anaheim PLATE 8 0 l3 a ti (.') ::c (.) ~ w (.') ct'. ~ -, a. (.') ::;; w ::c ~ <( ::c ~ ::, ::c (.) 0 w ct'. 0 z i2 !;j ~ ct'. uS ::c "' t; w ct'. i5 "' ::, 4,000 3,500 3,000 2 ,500 v· 'lii C. ::c I-/ (.!) z w 2 ,000 a:: V I-V (J) a:: <( w ::c: / (J) 1,500 1/ V 1,000 /' / 500v / 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 NORMAL PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 'Yct MC% C ♦ • P-2 0-5 Clayey Sand -Remolded -90% RC 102 16 462 26 3037 S. Harbor Blvd DIRECT SHEAR TEST ... ~'jt, Santa Ana , CA 92704 Project Number: 15-5382 Telephone: 714-641-7189 TGR GEOTEC HNIC A L, INC . Fax: 714-641-7190 Project Name: Kindred Community Church , Anaheim PLATE 9 LI\I\ LaBelle Marvi n PROJECT No. DATE: BORING NO. R -VALUE DATA SHEET 46558 10/16/2020 15-5382 Kindred Commu nity Chu rch SAMP LE DESCRIPTION: Brown Sa ndy Cl ay ---------'---'-------------- -------------------- Mold ID Number Water added, gr ams Init ial Test Water,% Compact Gage Pressure,ps i Exudation Pressure, ps i Height Samp le, Inches Gross Weight Mold, grams Tare Weight Mold, grams Sam pl e Wet We ight, grams Expa nsi o n, In ches x l0exp-4 Stabi l ity 2,000 lbs (160psi) Turns Displacement R-Value Uncorrected R-Value Corrected Dry Density, pcf Traffic In dex G.E. by Stability G. E. by Expa nsion Equilibrium R-Value Gf = R-VALUE TESTING DATA I CA TEST 301 SPECIMEN ID a b 16 17 70 17 20.8 15.1 45 170 225 458 2.67 2.47 305 1 3 008 1946 1940 1105 1068 23 92 63 / 143 33 I 81 4.28 3.61 6 40 7 40 103.8 113.8 DESIGN CALCULATION DATA Assumed: 4.0 1.25 0.95 0.77 12 by EXPANSION 4.0 0.61 3.07 Examined & Ch ecked: 0.0% Retained on the REMARKS: 3/4" Si eve. C 18 32 16.7 90 326 2.52 3027 1955 1072 62 40 I 101 3.88 27 27 110.4 4.0 0.75 2.07 10 /16/ 20 Th e data above is ba sed upon process ing and testing sa mpl es as r ece ived from the fi el d . Te st procedures in accordance with latest revi sions to Department of Transport ation, St ate of Ca li fornia, Materia ls & Research Test Method No. 301. LaBelle Marvin, In c. I 2700 South Grand Avenue I Santa Ana, CA 92705 I 714-546-3468 PLATE10LI\/\ R-VALUE GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION LaBelle Marvin PROJECT NO. DATE: BORING NO. 800 46558 10 /16/ 2020 REMARKS: 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 700 600 500 400 300 5.0 I l ! I 200 ·-·---]-: -1--;--+-+-·•·--+-+---1-4--··-i--'-f--'-+-•· 1---r·1 ; : -·! ' +--t--1--t-!..._ I l I 100 4.5 I _Ll _t_ i I I ~i --'--~--+-+--+--~• 4.0 ~I I =1-1+---+--:~ i I • j I 1 ! ' I -HJ, i ___ __J_J_;__ l l i I -±t·' I J+ 1-:-t-I . ·--rr--1 ~ ! -__L --+-+-t;: 3.5 +~-1 ·+1-.-~ ·+w i --··r·1·--t····t ; t-t-t-+ I I. I II I II I z 0 ~ C :::, 1:i 3.0 ,. "' ~ ~ w ~ 2.5 : ... "' w > 8 2.0 1.5 1.0 I I I I I I +-~H---+-f--·I·--'--+--'--~ I --I ·'-'--'---'--I -~ I • +--__L1 I -H-' i j --t-r·-i--0.5 ! ' ' f . j ' W-1 ~ ~ffi--'--t-+-t=j--t-4f¥j=; : l{K+-~-n1~_r.=_c_ • I I I "T"7 +i--,--, , · · T··t-ri ,-TT! I I j--1 l . ' ~ I I j ' !◄ ~'-, ~~1=i~c=.~1=r-=++=t==~+=+++:::;~c1=1=1~~a=i=:::::t11::11:::r• 0.0 IZ:==I:77 'I 1111 1111 I I 11I--rrr 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 COVER THICKNESS BY EXPANSION, FT. ■ EXUD. T vs. Expan. T ... R-VALUE vs. EXUD. PRES. 100 90 11 t I I z· 80 0 ~ C :::, 70 I I X "' z 0 .;; z ~ 1:i 60 I I ,. ., :a z "' V I I : 50 ... ffi > 11 0 V 40 30 20 10 0 "' ~ w• "' ~ "' .. "' 0 b "' ~ 8 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.1 20.1 21.1 MOISTURE(¾) AT FABRICAITON 5.0 .,.-.,..,-,..,.-.-"':1r_ t,rr _..,..,.+ ,t-i-r-t'_,_'~.r.r..-m,-T+, _-L-;! -!' +T+r .,..:-_,,_-+' +' .;_,-H'l-'+..c.,. +7:,-f-. +-,-h--+' +' _,.,.,1rr,,--,-;-,-,,rr,, I_J I I I I • t J i n71.:.m 1 1 1 __ , 1 .. l ·-+-1.L -h7'· 1 1 , 1 ,JJI "'·-'---...t..L 1.-LL 40 I I I f I I 1 ; I J 1 7"1 1, I Ii ! J , 1 ;fTl t • 1 : 1 I • .. 1 1 i .......LLL , 1 1 • t-H 1 1 i 1 1 _ 111.11--1..Lu.. 1 • : 1 1 1 -L _1-L~L 1.;p::[. __ Jl..L . .i+f-f+!-,-~ .. ,.:..c.L lil ,+:-J. r+-f I.W!TI . .J.J..IL I-L!...L J -L'-t:q::;:-J '--1-,+w..1.. ~-H++ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1~ -r i7 i 1 : -~ ~+7 , ... r++t-1+~+ rl--: ·H··;-t , 1 1 : 1 ,i+ 'I. l I I j ! f ! t; I t I i f I ! I I 1-L..Ll ~.J...Lf+!.J. __ j ' : I! .. t+i=' I ' J ... l.__ Li .. ' I • I I . ' . I ·'-Lh.l..LU ..j..,../..• N...L ,1' 1 ,,, , ,·f--t-1 .Ji ii " "· · lf"T ,.b:f ·r~µJj I ~r~ cL d::::r: ti4 ci_µ *' I ' ,J.J +1r:H 1I r.±H±t1 30 1111; ·11 Ii II 1m·1r T·1 ""1 t ---.1--;-I II r T/tl lT n r I 11T . ! I • l I : , "~ : : i I I l -f • : , 1+ H-H m r+ ++-rH++Y-f+t H+ . .. .. . . I 11..l.l'.LUJ ! Ll......l.!...L I 11 LI 11 Ucll 2.0 , ,~ : :'_,',.'~.:~~++.,_... .. ,.;.;................. hr ~f JH_~++i·-4++,·++F;..l'"c't.,1++....,c++++-1+-++-1-,..j H++'+++,-;+++ t--tt--t--tt-:-r ! ·!'·+f-i"" 1 I ·-++++L+-~;-,.....,,._. ·1r ! i I'. ! l ....._ ....... ...,.. ........... .__~....-~~ _J __ .l, 1.o t:ttt:ttttjj:ttH-t-tttH+H-+r.++t-L!~++r.:+:q:P::.~~m:::tn.irtt:tr:::tt:ct: o.o ....... ~.w...._c...yµ...Ll...Ll.il.LJ..!..l....l.LL□[JJII=ttµtrt:tt±j:±t±±:!:±:±±±h:!Jt8::J:tt±~~ft£ 14.1 15.1 16.1 17.1 18.1 19.l 20.1 21.1 MOISTURE(¾) •EXPANSION ■EXUDATION ANAHEIM TEST LAB, INC. 196 Technology Drive, Unit D Irvine, CA 92618 Phone (949)336-6544 TO: DATE: 10/20/2020 TGR GEOTECHNICAL 3037 S. HARBOR BLVD. P.O. NO: VERBAL SANTA ANA, CA. 92704 LAB NO: C-4184 SPECIFICATION: CTM-417 MATERIAL: Soil Project No.: 15-5382 Project: Kindred Community Church Sample ID: B2 @ 0-5’ ANALYTICAL REPORT SOLUBLE SULFATES per CT. 417 ppm 218 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ________________________________ WES BRIDGER LAB MANAGER PLATE 11 15-5382 Percolation Test Worksheet Table 1 Test Hole Total Depth (in) Initial Depth (in) Final Depth (in) DWater Level (in) Initial Time (min) Final Time (min) D Time (min) Initial Height of Water (in) Final Height of Water (in) Average Height of Water (in) Infiltration Rate (in/hr) P-1 126 3.5 5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 122.5 121 121.75 0.15 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 126 4 5 1 0.0 10.0 10.0 122 121 121.50 0.10 126 3.5 5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 122.5 121 121.75 0.15 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 P-2 126 3 7 4 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 119 121.00 0.39 126 6.5 8.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 119.5 117.5 118.50 0.20 126 5 7.5 2.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 121 118.5 119.75 0.25 126 5.5 7.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120.5 118.5 119.50 0.20 126 5.5 7.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120.5 118.5 119.50 0.20 126 6 8 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120 118 119.00 0.20 P-3 126 4.5 7 2.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 121.5 119 120.25 0.25 126 9 11 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 117 115 116.00 0.20 126 9.5 11 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 116.5 115 115.75 0.15 126 10.5 12 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 115.5 114 114.75 0.15 126 10 11.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 116 114.5 115.25 0.15 =Change in height t Infiltration Rate =Time interval ave Average Head Height over the time interval r = Radius t::.H(60r) It= ) l::.t(r + 2Havg AH At I H TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 714 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com APPENDIX A REFERENCES APPENDIX A References Allwest Geoscience , Inc., 1999, Remedial Grading Report for the Planned Garden Church Development, 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, Orange County, California, Job No. 98-1342GC-1 , dated December 20 , 1999. Bell/Knott & Associates, Kindred Community Church, Campus Design Development Giles Engineering Associates , Inc., 2014, Geotechnical Feasibility Study, Proposed Site Development, 8270 East Santa Ana Canyon Road , Anaheim Hills , California , Project No . 2G- 1402006, dated March 18, 2014. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 90-19, Landslide Hazards in the North Half of the Black Star Canyon Quadrangle, Orange and Riverside Counties , California , dated 1992. Pacific Soils Engineering , Inc., 1997a, Mass Grading Report, Garden Church Site , The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California , Work Order 101476G4, dated February 28, 1997. ____ , 1997b, Project Grading Report, Lots 3 through 25 incl., Tract 15125, Single- Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim , California , Work Order 101476G4, dated April 11, 1997. ____ , 1997c, Project Grading Report, Lots 1 and 2, Tract 15125, Single-Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim , California , Work Order 101476G4, dated April 28, 1997. ____ , 1997d, Project Grading Report, Lots 3 through 26 incl., Tract 15120, Single- Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California , Work Order 101476G4, dated May 6 , 1997. Sessions Consulting Engineers , 2015 , Aerial Topography Map , Kindred Community Church , 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim California , Project No. 01-227-1 , dated May 4, 2015 . TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 7 14 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com APPENDIX B SITE SEISMIC DESIGN AND DE-AGGREGATED PARAMETERS TGR GEOTECHNICAL DBE & B(a) firm 3037 S, HARBOR BLVD SANTAANA , CA92704 P 714 .641 .7189 F 7 14 ,641 ,7190 www.tgrgeotech .com SA Period (sec) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.75 1 2 3 4 5 Code Sds Code Sd1 To Ts TL Input Probabilistic Spectral Acceleration (g) Rotated Maximum 0.8943 1.5312 2.0383 2.2984 2.2725 1.9355 1.6770 0.9072 0.5950 0.4234 0.3225 1.285 1.132 0.18 0.88 8 TABLE 1 SITE SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION ANALYSIS 15-5382 Kindred Community Church Probabilistic Risk Spectral Coefficients Acceleration MCER (g) Rotated Maximum 0.911 0.8147 0.911 1.3949 0.911 1.8569 0.911 2.0938 0.911 2.0702 0.911 1.7632 0.911 1.5277 0.911 0.8265 0.911 0.5420 0.911 0.3857 0.911 0.2938 Crs = 0.911 Cr1 = 0.911 Code Fa= 1 Code Fv = 2.5 Is Largest Deterministic Deterministic Spectral Spectral Acceleration (g) Acceleration <1.5*Fa Rotated Maximum 84th Percentile 0.9730 1.4118 1.8899 2.3532 2.6825 2.5069 No 2.2904 1.3387 0.8861 0.6046 0.4415 Code Ss = 1.927 Code S1 = 0.679 Sms = 1.927 Sm1 = 1.6975 Deterministic MCER 0.9730 1.4118 1.8899 2.3532 2.6825 2.5069 2.2904 1.3387 0.8861 0.6046 0.4415 Site Specific MCER 0.8147 1.3949 1.8569 2.0938 2.0702 1.7632 1.5277 0.8265 0.5420 0.3857 0.2938 Site Specific 2/3 of Site 80% Specific Code Design Response MCER Design Spectrum 0.5431 0.4111 0.5431 0.9299 0.7611 0.9299 1.2379 1.0277 1.2379 1.3959 1.0277 1.3959 1.3801 1.0277 1.3801 1.1755 1.0277 1.1755 1.0185 0.9053 1.0185 0.5510 0.4527 0.5510 0.3614 0.3018 0.3614 0.2571 0.2263 0.2571 0.1959 0.1811 0.1959 Site Specific Sos = 1.256 Site Specific So1 = 1.102 0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.50 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (g)PERIOD (SEC)Site Specific Design Response SpectraProbabilistic SA (Rotated Max) MCERDeterministic SA (Rotated Max) MCERDeterministic MCERSite Specific MCER80% of Design CodeSite Specific Design Response SpectrumFIGURE 1 Site Specific Design Response Spectra 15-5382 Kindred Community Church -a- 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Max Direction RTGM (g)Period (sec) Probabilistic Response Spectra per ASCE 7-16 TABLE 2 Probabilistic Response Spectrum ASCE 7-16 Method 2 15-5382 Kindred Community Church Period UHGM RTGM Max Dir Max Dir RTGM (g) (g) (g) Scale factor (g) 0 0.842 0.813 1.1 0.894 0.1 1.432 1.392 1.1 1.531 0.2 1.881 1.853 1.1 2.038 0.3 2.136 2.043 1.125 2.298 0.5 2.067 1.934 1.175 2.272 0.75 1.687 1.564 1.2375 1.935 1 1.410 1.290 1.3 1.677 2 0.734 0.672 1.35 0.907 3 0.466 0.425 1.4 0.595 4 0.320 0.292 1.45 0.423 5 0.237 0.215 1.5 0.323 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Max Direction RTGM (g)Period (sec) Deterministic Response Spectra per ASCE 7-16 Period (g) 0.001 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.75 1 2 3 4 5 TABLE 3 Deterministic Response Spectrum ASCE 7-16 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 84th- Mean Sigma Percentile Max Dir Spectra Spectral (g) (g) Acceleration Scale factor (g) 0.538 0.497 0.885 1.1 0.754 0.532 1.283 1.1 1.044 0.498 1.718 1.1 1.242 0.521 2.092 1.125 1.271 0.586 2.283 1.175 1.074 0.634 2.026 1.2375 0.906 0.666 1.762 1.3 0.491 0.703 0.992 1.35 0.311 0.710 0.633 1.4 0.207 0.701 0.417 1.45 0.146 0.702 0.294 1.5 Max Dir Deterministic SA (g) 0.973 1.412 1.890 2.353 2.683 2.507 2.290 1.339 0.886 0.605 0.441 l\TC Hazards by Location Search Information Coordinates: Elevation: Timestamp: 33.8635 , -117 .7224 450 ft 2020-11-09T23 :39 :46 .837Z Deer 1nyon Park \?.:.I g -c Hazard Type: Seismic ANAHEIM HILLS J.f Reference Document: Risk Category: ASCE7-16 Ill Site Class: D Basic Parameters Name Value Ss 1.927 S1 0.679 SMs 1.927 SM1 * null Sos 1.284 So1 * null * See Section 11.4.8 Description MCER ground motion (period=0.2s) MCER ground motion (period=1 .0s) Site-modified spectral acceleration value Site-modified spectral acceleration value Numeric seismic design value at 0 .2s SA Numeric seismic design value at 1.0s SA -..Additional Information Name Value Description soc * null Seismic design category Fa 1 Site amplification factor at 0.2s Fv * null Site amplification factor at 1.0s CRs 0.911 Coefficient of risk (0.2s) CR1 0.911 Coefficient of risk (1.0s) PGA 0.816 MCEG peak ground acceleration FPGA 1.1 Site amplification factor at PGA PGAM 0 .897 Site modified peak ground acceleration TL 8 Long-period transition period (s) .,. Canyo1 450 ft ·k - ~ RMap data ©2020 SsRT 1.927 SsUH 2 .115 SsD 2 .336 S1RT 0 .679 S1UH 0 .745 S1D 0 .931 PGAd 0 .984 * See Section 11.4.8 Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (0 .2s) Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) Factored deterministic acceleration value (0 .2s) Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (1 .0s) Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) Factored deterministic acceleration value (1 .0s) Factored deterministic acceleration value (PGA) The results indicated here DO NOT reflect any state or local amendments to the values or any delineation lines made during the building code adoption process. Users should confirm any output obtained from this tool with the local Authority Having Jurisdiction before proceeding with design . Disclaimer Hazard loads are provided by the U.S . Geological Survey Seismic Design Web Services. While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, ATC and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in the report should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals . ATC does not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the report provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use . Use of the output of this website does not imply approval by the governing building code bodies responsible for building code approval and interpretation for the building site described by latitude/longitude location in the report. U.S. Geological Survey-Earthquake Hazards Program Unified Hazard Tool Please do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design code reference documents covered by the U.S. Seismic Design MaP-S web tools (e.g., the International Building Code and the ASCE 7 or 41 Standard). The values returned by the two applications are not identical. A Input Edition Spectral Period ._I _o_y_n_a_m_ic_:_c_o_n_te_r_m_i_n_o _us_u _.s_. _2_01_4_(_u_. _· . __ __.I I Peak Ground Acceleration Latitude Time Horizon Decimal degrees Return period in years ~I _33_._s6_3_s ___________ ~I I 2475 Longitude Decimal degrees, negative values for western longitudes 1-117.7224 Site Class 259 m/s (Site class D) A Hazard Curve Hazard Curves Uniform Hazard Response Spectrum 1..+0 3.0 le-1 QI le-2 u C: 2.5 QI le-3 "O QI QI le-4 u ill le-5 'o >, le-6 -Time Horizon 2475 years u C: -+ Peak Ground Acceleration QI le-7 -0.10 Second Spectral Acceleration ::, CT .....,. 0.20 Second Spectral Acceleration ~ le-8 LL ....,_. 0.30 Second Spectral Acceleration :§ 2.0 C: 0 :g :::;: 1.5 "O C: ::, 2 1.0 \!) -;;; le-9 .....,. 0.50 Second Spectral Acceleration ::, .....,. 0. 75 Second Spectral Acceleration C: le-10 C: .....,. 1.00 Second Spectral Acceleration <( ....,_ 2.00 Second Spectral Acceleration le-11 3.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.5 le-12 .....,. 4.00 Second Spectral Acceleration le-13 .....,. 5.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.0 le-2 le-1 le+O 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.S 4.0 4.5 5.0 Ground Motion (g) Spectral Period (s) Component Curves for Peak Ground Acceleration l..+0 le-1 QI le-2 u C: le-3 QI "O QI le-4 QI u ill le-5 'o le-6 >, u le-7 C: QI le-8 ::, CT ~ le-9 -;;; le-10 ::, C: le-11 -Time Horizon 2475 years C: <( le-12 ....... system -Grid le-13 .....,. Interface le-14 ....,_.Fault le-2 le-1 l..+0 Ground Motion (g) View Raw Data A Deaggregation Component Total LI) N •• •• • ••• •• •• .. • • • •• • • • ■ E = (-00 •• -2.5) ■ E= [-2.5 .. -2) ■ E= [-2 .. -1.5) 0 E= [-1.5 .. -1) 0 E = [-1..-0.5) 0 E= [-0.5 .. 0) 0 E= [0 .. 0.5) 0 E= [0.5 .. 1) ■ E= [1 .. 1.5) ■ E= [1.5 .. 2) ■ E= [2 .. 2.5) ■ E = [2.5 .. +oo) Summary statistics for, Deaggregation: Total Deaggregation targets Return period: 2475 yrs Exceedance rate: 0.0004040404 yr-1 PGA ground motion: 0.84246025 g Totals Binned: 100 % Residual: O % Trace: 0.04 % Mode (largest m-r bin) m: 6.48 r: 8.71 km Eo: 1.710 Contribution: 16.94 % Discretization r: min= 0.0, max= 1000.0, fl= 20.0 km m: min= 4.4, max= 9.4, fl= 0.2 E: min= -3 .0, max= 3 .0, fl= 0.5 o Recovered targets Return period: 2882 .8216 yrs Exceedance rate: 0.00034688237 yr-1 Mean ( over all sources) m: 6 .74 r: 7.57 km t:o: 1.43 o Mode (largest m-r-Eo bin) m: 7 .72 r: 2.48 km Eo: 0 .7 0 Contribution: 9 .86 % Epsilon keys EO: [-00 •• -2 .5) £1: [-2.5 .. -2.0) E2: [-2 .0 .. -1.5) E3: [-1.5 .. -1.0) t:4: [-1.0 .. -0.5) ES: [-0.5 .. 0.0) t:6: [0.0 .. 0.5) E7: [0.5 .. 1.0) £8: [1.0 .. 1.5) E9: [1.5 .. 2.0) £10: [2.0 .. 2.5) t:11: [2.s .. +00 l Deaggregation Contributors SourceSet L+ Source Type r m Eo Ion lat az o/o UC33brAvg_FM31 System 48.44 Whittier alt 1 [2] 2.10 7.29 0.91 117.712°W 33.876°N 33 .12 16.43 Chino alt 1 [3] 6.46 6.58 1.16 117.662°W 33 .910°N 46.95 11.72 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) rev [O] 12.89 6.51 2.26 117.590°W 33.829°N 107.43 5.24 Chino alt 1 [2] 6.64 6.24 1.29 117.669°W 33 .917°N 39.73 3.96 Chino alt 1 [1] 9.11 6.08 1.86 117.703°W 33.950°N 10.47 2.46 Whittier alt 1 [1] 2.49 6.80 1.08 117.702°W 33.874°N 58.72 2.34 Peralta Hills [O] 2.92 6.42 1.09 117.740°W 33.848°N 223 .82 2.01 UC33brAvg_FM32 System 36 .59 Whittier alt2 [2] 2.18 7.49 0.86 117.719°W 33 .878°N 9.51 14.00 Chino alt 2 [2] 7.57 6.85 1.22 117.658°W 33 .908°N 50 .26 7.36 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) rev [O] 12.89 6.50 2.27 117.590°W 33 .829°N 107.43 5.35 Chino alt 2 [1] 7.84 6.35 1.40 117.670°W 33 .92l°N 37 .27 2.75 Richfield [O] 8.71 6.33 1.88 117.803°W 33 .889°N 290 .83 1.69 Whittier alt 2 [1] 2.18 7.10 0.97 117.719°W 33 .878°N 9.51 1.30 UC33brAvg_FM32 (opt) Grid 7.66 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33 .904 6.89 5.57 1.79 117.722°W 33 .904°N 0.00 1.74 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33 .904 6.89 5.57 1.79 117.722°W 33 .904°N 0.00 1.74 UC33brAvg_FM31 (opt) Grid 7.32 PointSourceFinite: -117 .722, 33 .904 6.93 5.52 1.82 117.722°W 33 .904°N 0.00 1.51 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33 .904 6.93 5.52 1.82 117.722°W 33 .904°N 0.00 1.51 Appendix E EDR Radius Map Report FORM-LBE-KKT ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Kindred Church Expansion Project 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim, CA 92808 Inquiry Number: 6397650.2s March 09, 2021 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 9 Orphan Summary 33 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-18 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-20 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC6397650.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD ANAHEIM, CA 92808 COORDINATES 33.8647050 - 33˚ 51’ 52.93’’Latitude (North): 117.7229550 - 117˚ 43’ 22.63’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 433128.8UTM X (Meters): 3747196.0UTM Y (Meters): 413 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5636465 BLACK STAR CANYON, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5640938 PRADO DAM, CANorth Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140603Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 6397650.2s Page 2 6 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 24000 SANTA ANA CANY LUST, SWEEPS UST, Cortese, EMI, WDS, CIWQS, CERS Lower 1576, 0.298, ENE 5 RUNNING SPRINGS ELEM 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS ENVIROSTOR, SCH, CERS Higher 1510, 0.286, SSW B4 OWL ROCK NEW STAR 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN UST Lower 576, 0.109, ENE B3 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENVIROSTOR, LUST, VCP, Orange Co. Industrial Site,... Lower 576, 0.109, ENE A2 KINDRED CMNTY CHURCH 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN CIWQS TP A1 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN CIWQS TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD ANAHEIM, CA 92808 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN ANAHEIM, CA 92808 N/ACIWQS KINDRED CMNTY CHURCH 8712 E SANTA ANA CAN ANAHEIM, CA 92808 N/ACIWQS DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CERS HAZ WASTE CERS HAZ WASTE US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database CERS TANKS California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records UIC UIC Listing UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing CERS CERS NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) HWTS Hazardous Waste Tracking System MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/26/2020 has revealed that there are 2 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RUNNING SPRINGS ELEM 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.286 mi.) 5 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Facility Id: 30820003 Status: No Action Required PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) B3 10 Facility Id: 30320052 Status: No Further Action State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) B3 10 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0605901925 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 24000 SANTA ANA CANY ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.) 6 21 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 09/01/2020 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0605994052 Global ID: T0605901022 Facility Id: 89UT187 Facility Id: 91UT133 Facility Id: 90UT189 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ OWL ROCK NEW STAR 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) B4 18 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Facility Id: 403 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Facility Id: 4803 Facility Id: 7002 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/26/2020 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) B3 10 Status: No Further Action Facility Id: 30320052 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Other Ascertainable Records Cortese: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/22/2020 has revealed that there are 2 Cortese sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 9010 E SANTA ANA CAN ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) B3 10 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 24000 SANTA ANA CANY ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.298 mi.) 6 21 Cleanup Status: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC6397650.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 There were no unmapped sites in this report. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.607206 806 4 0 640 680 6406 4 0 66 406 0060 0 60 0 6 00 6 0065 6 0 5605 6 0 5 6 0 56036 0 4004404404404 0 0 4004 4 0 4 4 0 4 8 0 4 8 0 4804 8 0 4 8 0 520 520520520 5 2 0 4 4 0440 4 0 03 604 4 0 40 0 400 360 3 6 0 6009 2 0 84 0 8 8 08 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 00 4 0 0 5 6 0 84 0 560 800 800 760 760 7207 2 0 44 04404 4 0 440440 4 4 0 760 680760 760 4804804804 8 0 4 8 0 4804 8 0 4 804804 80960 9208809 2 0 8 8 0 1 1 60 52 05 2 0 520520520 5205 2 0 52052052 0 5 2 0 520520 520 11 20105605 65605 6 0560560560560560560560 560 5 6 0 600 6006 0 0 600600600600 6 0060060060 0 6 0 0 6 00 6 0 0 0 0 6 4 66406406 4 0 6 40640640640 6 4 0 640 6 404 0 6806 80 6 80 6 806 8 0680680 6 8 0 680 680720720 7207 20720720 7207201080 1080 7 60 7607 6 0 7607607 6076076076 0 800800 8008 00 8 0 0 8008000 8 0 0 84084084084084084084 0 4 0 88088 0880880880880 9209209209209209 2 0 92096096 0 960960 96010001000101000 1 0401040108011 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 360 360 600 56064 0 840 800 720 44 440440 480480 480520520 520 560560 6 0 0 600 600 640640 680 6 8 0 680 720 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-VSQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROLS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 2 NR 0 1 0 1 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500LUST TC6397650.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 1 NR NR 0 0 1 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS HAZ WASTE 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PFAS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SWEEPS UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HIST UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA FID UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CERS TANKS Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS TC6397650.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Orange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 2 NR NR 1 0 1 0.500Cortese TC6397650.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDR 2 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001 2CIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHWTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES MRDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 10 0 0 3 0 5 2- Totals -- TC6397650.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC6397650.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.722677Longitude: 33.866593Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: 01/01/1900Expiration/Review Date: 02/22/2002Termination Date: 09/23/1998Effective Date: 01/01/1900Adoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 30C309736WDID: 99-08DWOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: 8712 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd, Anaheim, CA 92808Agency Address: Garden ChurchAgency: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: 8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDName: CIWQS: Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Actual: 413 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92808 Target 8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD N/A A1 CIWQS8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD S121617930 Not reportedDesign Flow: 01/01/1900Expiration/Review Date: 07/05/2005Termination Date: 05/12/2004Effective Date: 01/01/1900Adoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 30C327514WDID: 99-08DWOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - OtherPlace/Project Type: 17853 Santiago Blvd Ste 107, Villa Park, CA 92861Agency Address: Kindred Community ChurchAgency: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: KINDRED CMNTY CHURCHName: CIWQS: Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Actual: 413 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92808 Target 8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD N/A A2 CIWQSKINDRED CMNTY CHURCH S121648620 TC6397650.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.722677Longitude: 33.866593Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: KINDRED CMNTY CHURCH (Continued) S121648620 514-012-08Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 514-012-008Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: IRVINE COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FORMER INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT PLANTAlias Name: SOIL, SOILPotential Description: hydrocarbons (PAHs Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes Benzene Lead Polynuclear aromatic Benzene 10009-NO Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsConfirmed COC: hydrocarbons (PAHs (PAHs Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes Benzene Lead Polynuclear aromatic * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS Benzene Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbonsPotential COC: RECYCLING - SCRAP METAL, MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: 514-012-008, 514-012-08APN: -117.7062Longitude: 33.86183Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Johnson AbrahamProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.13Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401036Site Code: 01/22/2007Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 30320052Facility ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 9010 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROADAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT PLANT (FORMER)Name: ENVIROSTOR: CERS CIWQS NPDES 576 ft.CorteseSite 1 of 2 in cluster B 0.109 mi.Orange Co. Industrial Site Relative: Lower Actual: 378 ft. < 1/8 VCPANAHEIM, CA 92807 ENE LUST9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD N/A B3 ENVIROSTORINDUSTRIAL ASPHALT S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2007Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fully executed voluntary cleanup agreementComments: 07/14/2006Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Former Industrial Asphalt Company. Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) or equivalent with the A Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) was signed to conduct aComments: 10/08/2002Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/22/2007Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: specified in the approval letter. DTSC conditionally approved the Workplan. The conditions areComments: 07/26/2006Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: that the site requires further action. DTSC completed review of the PEA equivalent report and determinedComments: 06/01/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30320052Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401036Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033615121Alias Name: APNAlias Type: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/11/1995Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901925Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 12/11/1995Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901925Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/23/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901925Global Id: LUST: 9513206375Phone Number: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901925Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITYOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901925Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: Not reportedFile Location: ANAHEIM CITYLocal Agency: 083002796TRB Case Number: ROWCase Worker: 03/27/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.7348398Longitude: 33.8697558Latitude: T0605901925Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605901925Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ANAHEIM CITYLead Agency: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: LUST: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation APNAlias Type: 514-012-008Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: IRVINE COMPANYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: FORMER INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT PLANTAlias Name: SOIL, SOILPotential Description: 30003,10009-NO,30019,30272,30550,30593,, ,30003,30013,30019Confirmed COC: 10009, 30003, 30019, 30272, 30550, 30593, 30003, 30013, 30019Potential COC: RECYCLING - SCRAP METAL, MANUFACTURING - OTHERPast Use: 514-012-008, 514-012-08APN: 33.86183 / -117.7062Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 01/22/2007Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 401036Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Johnson AbrahamProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2.13Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 30320052Facility ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 9010 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROADAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT PLANT (FORMER)Name: VCP: 03/27/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901925Global Id: 10/08/2001Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901925Global Id: 10/07/2001Status Date: Open - Reopen CaseStatus: T0605901925Global Id: 10/23/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901925Global Id: 12/11/1995Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901925Global Id: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2007Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Fully executed voluntary cleanup agreementComments: 07/14/2006Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Former Industrial Asphalt Company. Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) or equivalent with the A Voluntary Cleanup Agreement (VCA) was signed to conduct aComments: 10/08/2002Completed Date: Standard Voluntary AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/22/2007Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: specified in the approval letter. DTSC conditionally approved the Workplan. The conditions areComments: 07/26/2006Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: that the site requires further action. DTSC completed review of the PEA equivalent report and determinedComments: 06/01/2004Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30320052Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401036Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110033615121Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 514-012-08Alias Name: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: ConstructionRegulatory Measure Type: 8 30C331548WDID: Not reportedOrder Number: Not reportedPlace ID: Not reportedRegulatory Measure ID: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedRegion: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedFacility Status: ANAHEIM, CA 92805City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: STAR ROCK PLANTName: NPDES: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: T0605901925Global ID: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: CORTESE: FUEL WASTEReleased Chemical: Closure certification issuedClosure Type: CLOSED 11/22/2005Current Status: RO0003322Record ID: 04IC019Case ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: STAR ROCK PLANTName: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CoronaDeveloper City: PO Box 3600Developer Address: Robertsons Ready MixDeveloper: Private BusinessOperator Type: Not reportedOperator Contact Email: Not reportedOperator Contact Phone Ext: 949-720-2292Operator Contact Phone: Not reportedOperator Contact Title: Peter ChangalaOperator Contact: 92660Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: Newport BeachOperator City: 550 Newport Center DrOperator Address: Irvine Community Development Company LLCOperator Name: Not reportedContact Email: Not reportedContact Phone Ext: 951-830-4741Contact Phone: Not reportedContact Title: Dave DenneyContact: AcresPlace Size Unit: 300Place Size: 07/28/2006Status Date: TerminatedStatus: Not reportedProcessed Date: 05/09/2008Received Date: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30C331548WDID: Not reportedPlace ID: ConstructionRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder Number: 286872Regulatory Measure ID: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNPDES Number: NPDES as of 03/2018: 92660Operator Zip: CaliforniaOperator State: Newport BeachOperator City: 550 Newport Center DrOperator Address: Irvine Community Development Company LLCOperator Name: 07/28/2006Status Date: TerminatedStatus: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedDischarge Address: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: 01/01/1900Expiration/Review Date: 01/01/1900Termination Date: 01/01/1900Effective Date: 01/01/1900Adoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 30C331548WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - Industrial, Reconstruction, OtherPlace/Project Type: 550 Newport Center Dr, Newport Beach, CA 92660Agency Address: Irvine Community Development Company LLCAgency: ANAHEIM, CA 92805City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: STAR ROCK PLANTName: CIWQS: Not reportedTertiary Sic: Not reportedSecondary Sic: Not reportedPrimary Sic: 03-DEC-04Certification Date: EnvironmentalCertifier Title: Jodi KovalCertifier: Gypsum Creek Santa Ana RiverReceiving Water Name: Not reportedDir Discharge Uswater Ind: Not reportedConstype Water Sewer Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Ind: Not reportedConstype Utility Description: Not reportedConstype Transport Ind: Not reportedConstype Residential Ind: YConstype Recons Ind: YConstype Other Ind: Not reportedConstype Other Description: YConstype Industrial Ind: Not reportedConstype Gas Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Electrical Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Commertial Ind: Not reportedConstype Comm Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Cable Line Ind: Not reportedConstype Below Ground Ind: Not reportedConstype Above Ground Ind: 382Emergency Phone Ext: 951-830-4741Emergency Phone: Not reportedConstype Linear Utility Ind: Not reportedDeveloper Contact Title: Jodi KovalDeveloper Contact: 92878Developer Zip: CaliforniaDeveloper State: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 TC6397650.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: ANAHEIMAffiliation City: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: RICHARD O. WILSON - ANAHEIM CITYEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 9513206375Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RIVERSIDEAffiliation City: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ROSE SCOTT - SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0605901925CERS ID: 205819Site ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: CERS: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: 0Violations within 5 years: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)S108198169 OWL ROCK NEW STARName: -117.704864Longitude: 33.863139Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 403Facility ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD # BAddress: ROBERTSON’S READY MIX-STAR ROCKName: -117.704864Longitude: 33.863139Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 7002Facility ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD # AAddress: ROBERTSON’S READI MIXName: UST: 576 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B 0.109 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 378 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92808 ENE 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RD N/A B4 USTOWL ROCK NEW STAR U003989246 TC6397650.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.704864Longitude: 33.863139Latitude: Not reportedPermitting Agency: 4803Facility ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 9010 E SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STAR (Continued)U003989246 Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404171Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE USD-RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.7253Longitude: 33.85882Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 9Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404171Site Code: 11/03/2000Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 30820003Facility ID: ORANGE, CA 92868City,State,Zip: 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVEAddress: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName: ENVIROSTOR: 1510 ft. 0.286 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 751 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSORANGE, CA 92868 SSW SCH8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVE N/A 5 ENVIROSTORRUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S118756662 TC6397650.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Alternate NameAlias Type: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE USD-RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARYAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.7253Longitude: 33.85882Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 11/03/2000Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 37Senate: 68Assembly: 404171Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Javier HinojosaSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 9Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30820003Facility ID: ORANGE, CA 92868City,State,Zip: 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVEAddress: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLName: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: CRU Memo completedComments: 01/30/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/03/2000Completed Date: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S118756662 TC6397650.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: JAVIER HINOJOSAEntity Name: SupervisorAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: School InvestigationCERS Description: 30820003CERS ID: 371610Site ID: ORANGE, CA 92868City,State,Zip: 8670 RUNNING SPRINGS DRIVEAddress: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMName: CERS: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: CRU Memo completedComments: 01/30/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/03/2000Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30820003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404171Alias Name: RUNNING SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S118756662 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: ORANGE CO. LUST: CERS CIWQS 1576 ft.WDS 0.298 mi.EMI Relative: Lower Actual: 394 ft. 1/4-1/2 CorteseANAHEIM, CA 92807 ENE SWEEPS UST24000 SANTA ANA CANYON N/A 6 LUSTINDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 1/21/1997Close Date: 1/1/1965Enforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 11/7/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 11/4/1989Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901022Global ID: UNKLeak Source: OverfillLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: 91 FREEWAYCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001345TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK PRODUCTSName: LUST REG 8: RO0001418Record ID: 01/01/2003Date Closed: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D, 2-4Released Substance: 90UT189Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: R.F. WHITE COMPANY, INCName: RO0002780Record ID: 04/01/1991Date Closed: (motor gasoline and additives), leaded & unleaded Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D, 2-4; Gasoline-AutomotiveReleased Substance: 91UT133Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ANAHEIM, CA 92808City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK (STAR ROCK)Name: RO0001099Record ID: 12/19/1991Date Closed: Diesel fuel oil and additives, Nos.1-D, 2-D, 2-4Released Substance: 89UT187Facility Id: ORANGERegion: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605994052Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Other ground water affectedCase Type: 89UT187Local Case Num: Not reportedCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYONAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: WITH CLOSURE. FORMERLY INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (PREVIOUSLY CLOSED 12/20/91.) 10/17/96 LJA CONCUREDSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: UNNAMED BASINHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.7069891Longitude: 33.86064513Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 11/4/1989Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: 89UT187Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: AMCase Worker: 12/19/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.792744Longitude: 33.851515Latitude: T0605994052Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0605994052Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYONAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: LUST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 12/19/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/25/1989Discover Date: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-000-004803-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4803Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: SWEEPS UST: 12/19/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605994052Global Id: 10/25/1989Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605994052Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 10/25/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605994052Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/25/1989Date: OtherAction Type: T0605994052Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605994052Global Id: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605994052Global Id: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTank Status: 30-000-004803-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4803Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 5000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-000-004803-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4803Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-000-004803-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4803Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: 5Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02-29-88Created Date: 09-15-92Action Date: 09-30-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4803Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: 4Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PSTG: PETROLEUMTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-000-004803-000006SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 09-15-92Action Date: 09-30-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4803Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-000-004803-000010SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4803Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605994052Global ID: Not reportedEnvirostor Id: CORTESERegion: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYONAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: CORTESE: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-000-004803-000009SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 09-15-92Action Date: 09-30-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4803Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 2000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-000-004803-000008SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 09-15-92Action Date: 09-30-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4803Comp Number: ActiveStatus: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: OWL ROCK NEW STARName: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-000-004803-000007SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 7Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113474Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: ALL AMERICAN ASPHALTName: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 7Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113474Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: ALL AMERICAN ASPHALTName: EMI: Active OpenFile Name: Not reportedWaste Management Uit Name: Not reportedSolid Waste Id No: Not reportedWID Id: Not reportedRegion 2: Not reportedEffective Date: Not reportedWaste Discharge System No: Not reportedOrder No: activeFlag: Not reportedSwat R: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedOwner: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: COMPLETED - CASE CLOSEDCleanup Status: LUST CLEANUP SITESite/Facility Type: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 0SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 9096852200Agency Telephone: CRAIG PHILLIPSAgency Contact: CORONA 928781659Agency City,St,Zip: PO BOX 1659Agency Address: ROBERTSONS READY MIX-CORONAAgency Name: RICHARD TROESHFacility Contact: 9096852200Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I011160Facility ID: ANAHEIMCity: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: STAR BATCH PLANTName: WDS: 1.13Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.964Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.354SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 2.29NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 7.46Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.74Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1.7326Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2951SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 113474Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: ALL AMERICAN ASPHALTName: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ANTHONY MARTINEZ - ORANGE COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0605994052CERS ID: 213625Site ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYONAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALTName: CERS: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: 01/01/1900Expiration/Review Date: 08/31/2012Termination Date: 06/02/2008Effective Date: 01/01/1900Adoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 30C352120WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: ConstructionPlace/Project Type: PO Box 3600, Corona, CA 92878Agency Address: Robertsons Ready MixAgency: ANAHEIM, CA 92801City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: ROBERTSONS READY MIX STARName: CIWQS: dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation US EPA Air Emission Inventory System (EIS)CERS Description: 110001178207CERS ID: 473528Site ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92807City,State,Zip: 24000 SANTA ANA CANYON RDAddress: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT COAST ASPHName: 9517824903Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: RIVERSIDEAffiliation City: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: VALERIE JAHN-BULL - SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 7144336011Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SANTA ANAAffiliation City: INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT (Continued)1001611910 TC6397650.2s Page 32 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC6397650.2s Page 33 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC6397650.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC6397650.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators) RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2021 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC6397650.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC6397650.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/15/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6397650.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 07/21/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. TC6397650.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/23/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/11/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC6397650.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. TC6397650.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PFAS: PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing A listing of PFAS contaminated sites included in the GeoTracker database. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 05/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/06/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6397650.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 11/05/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing TC6397650.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 09/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Number of Days to Update: 574 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC6397650.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC6397650.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC6397650.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020 Number of Days to Update: 59 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 03/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 251 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 96 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC6397650.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 01/27/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020 Number of Days to Update: 151 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC6397650.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/14/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 03/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi Telephone: 202-693-9424 Last EDR Contact: 03/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC6397650.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 06/22/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/04/2020 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 05/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. TC6397650.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: South Coast Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 11/17/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Drycleaner Listing A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/28/2020 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 10/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 11/12/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/02/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/17/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 10/05/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 01/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/09/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/09/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 02/18/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/07/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDR: Waste Discharge Requirements Listing In general, the Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Program (sometimes also referred to as the "Non Chapter 15 (Non 15) Program") regulates point discharges that are exempt pursuant to Subsection 20090 of Title 27 and not subject to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Exemptions from Title 27 may be granted for nine categories of discharges (e.g., sewage, wastewater, etc.) that meet, and continue to meet, the preconditions listed for each specific exemption. The scope of the WDRs Program also includes the discharge of wastes classified as inert, pursuant to section 20230 of Title 27. TC6397650.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/07/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5810 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites TC6397650.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 12/04/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS ENF: Enforcement data No description is available for this data Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2497 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility. Date of Government Version: 10/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/14/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-324-2444 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCS: Permit Compliance System PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA, Office of Water Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015 Number of Days to Update: 120 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System Mineral Resources Data System TC6397650.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-6533 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives TC6397650.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 12/15/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2021 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 06/08/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/22/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan. Date of Government Version: 10/29/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Kern County Public Health Telephone: 661-321-3000 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/21/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2021 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2020 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 08/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: N/A Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2020 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2020 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 04/30/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-6973 Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES UST: Active & Inactive UST Inventory A listing of active & inactive underground storage tank site locations and underground storage tank historical sites, located in the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Los Angeles Fire Department Telephone: 213-978-3800 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SITE MIT LOS ANGELES: Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 07/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2020 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 01/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 11/16/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/3021 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 07/13/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2020 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/28/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 09/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/05/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 09/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2021 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 02/02/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 10/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 10/06/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC6397650.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/18/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2020 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 02/24/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2020 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 11/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/16/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 03/03/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC6397650.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 11/05/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/05/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/12/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/01/2021 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SANTA CLARA COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list TC6397650.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/20/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 02/22/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/06/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/26/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/16/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 02/16/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 12/03/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2021 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 12/15/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/16/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/23/2020 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 11/23/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 02/26/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/2021 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: TC6397650.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 08/11/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 10/14/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/20/2021 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/17/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 09/28/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. TC6397650.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 02/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/28/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2021 Number of Days to Update: 82 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 01/20/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2021 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 12/21/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/23/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 12/20/2020 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 01/26/2021 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2021 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC6397650.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 02/12/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/2021 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/11/2021 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2021 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 02/09/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2021 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/21/2021 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC6397650.2s Page GR-51 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: Endeavor Business Media Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Endeavor Business Media This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 TC6397650.2s Page GR-52 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6397650.2s Page GR-53 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC6397650.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5640938 PRADO DAM, CANorth Map: 2012Version Date: 5636465 BLACK STAR CANYON, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 413 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3747196.0UTM Y (Meters): 433128.8UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.722955 - 117˚ 43’ 22.64’’Longitude (West): 33.864705 - 33˚ 51’ 52.94’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ANAHEIM, CA 92808 8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC6397650.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 413 ft. North South West East929903919893842793636526462413380360364363394437501499532535496570620693821721723544413426524399560512418534523700General NEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapNOT AVAILABLE NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0090J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06059C0180J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: TertiarySystem: EoceneSeries: TeCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 12 6 7 1 5 9 2 3 11 9 4 5 2 13 7 8 8 10 9 14 8 9 8 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC6397650.2s Page A-6 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay11 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Moderately well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: MYFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-7 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: gravelly loamSoil Surface Texture: SOPERSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam79 inches64 inches 5 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay loam64 inches20 inches 4 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy clay loam20 inches11 inches 3 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-8 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular to loamy sand stratified sand59 inches 9 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: CORRALITOSSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered24 inches20 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported loam gravelly clay20 inches 3 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedgravelly loam 3 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-9 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: gravelly loamSoil Surface Texture: SOPERSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 5 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 1.4 Not reported Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay bedrock weathered18 inches14 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 1.4 Not reported Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayclay loam14 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: clay loamSoil Surface Texture: CALLEGUASSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-10 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 6 Max: Min: Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Not reported Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay bedrock weathered33 inches29 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Not reported Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly clay29 inches 9 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Not reported Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claygravelly loam 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-11 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedclay loam25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: clay loamSoil Surface Texture: ANAHEIMSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 7 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam to fine sandy stratified sand62 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-12 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: clay loamSoil Surface Texture: ANAHEIMSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 9 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered33 inches29 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported loam gravelly clay29 inches 9 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedgravelly loam 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: gravelly loamSoil Surface Texture: SOPERSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 8 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered29 inches25 inches 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-13 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered33 inches29 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported loam gravelly clay29 inches 9 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedloam 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: loamSoil Surface Texture: SOPERSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 10 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered29 inches25 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedclay loam25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-14 > 31 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: sandSoil Surface Texture: RIVERWASHSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 12 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reportedsilty clay loam68 inches55 inches 4 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reportedmuck55 inches20 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reported clay mucky silty20 inches 9 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reportedmucky clay 9 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 84 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Soil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: mucky claySoil Surface Texture: THAPTO-HISTIC FLUVAQUENTSSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 11 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-15 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 1.4 Not reported Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayclay14 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: claySoil Surface Texture: ALOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 13 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sandy loam coarse sand to stratified59 inches 5 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsand 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-16 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reported bedrock weathered29 inches25 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedclay25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: claySoil Surface Texture: ALOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 14 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 1.4 Not reported Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay bedrock weathered25 inches22 inches 3 Max: Min: Min: 0 Max: 1.4 Not reported Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayclay22 inches14 inches 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-17 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE3661 E20 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE3660 E19 1/2 - 1 Mile NECADWR0000032039 D18 1/2 - 1 Mile NECADWR8000005985 D17 1/2 - 1 Mile NECADPR0000002172 C16 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECAUSGSN00012250 B15 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECAUSGS000000957 B14 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADDW0000002531 B13 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADWR0000003511 B11 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADDW0000012867 B10 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADWR0000000013 B9 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADWR0000029973 8 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADWR8000005969 7 1/2 - 1 Mile ENECADWR0000022740 6 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADWR0000025152 5 1/2 - 1 Mile NNWCADWR0000002383 4 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NorthCADWR8000005975 3 0 - 1/8 Mile ENECADWR0000005982 A2 0 - 1/8 Mile ENECADWR0000014455 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile NEUSGS40000138720 C21 1/2 - 1 Mile ENEUSGS40000138686 B12 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC6397650.2s Page A-18 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.92 08 6008408 4 0 7607 2 0 720 6 8 0 68064080 0 80 07 76076 07720 7207206 6868 0 68068 0646 640 6 40 6 40 6 4 0 6406 406 006 0 0 6 006 006 0 0 6 0 0 600 6 0 0 6006006 0032 0 560560 5 5 6 0 5605 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0 5605603603604 00 400 40044 0 4 4 0 4404404404 404 0 0 4004 4 0 4 4 0480480480 4 8 0 4804 8 0 4 80520 520520 5 2 0 520 5 2 0520 520 5 2 0 5 20 4 4 0 4 0 0360440 40 0 400 6 0 360 360 9 20 8 80 8 40 8 8 08 40 400 4 0 0 4 0 0 4 00 4 00 400 805 6 0 840560800 800 760 760 7207 2 0 44 04404 4 0 440440 4 4 0 4404 4 0 0 76068 068 0 760 7604 0 4804804804 8 0 4 8 0 48048 0 4 8 0 48048 00 96 0 9208809 2 0 8 8 0880 1160 5205205 2 0 520520520 5205 2 0 52052052 0 5 2 0 520520520 1120 7 2076 0760 10001120 11601120 12 4096 0120092 011 6 0 1120 560 5605 6 0 5 6 0 560560560560560560560560560560 560 5 6 0 10 00 0600 600 6 0 0 6 0 0 6006 0 0 60 0600600600600600 6 0060060060 0 6 0 0 6 00 6 0 0 60 0 6 40 6 4 0 6 406406 4 0 6 46406406406 4 0 640640640640 6 4 0 640 6 406 40680680 68068 0 6 86806 80 6 80680680680680 6 8 0 680 68068 0 7 2 0 7 20720720 7 272072 0720720720720 7207207207201080 1 08076077 60760 77607 6 0 7607607607607607 6 0760 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 800 8008008 00 800800 80080080080 0 80 0 8 0 0 8008 40 8408408408408 4 0 8408408 4 0 8 408 4 0 840880880880880880880880 8809209209209209209 2 0 920960 9609609609609609609601000100010001000 1 000104010401040104010404000108010801120112011601160 CA TC6397650.2s Page A-20 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W33C001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W33C001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W33C001SWell ID: 4 NNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000002383CA WELLS Not ReportedWell Completion Rpt #: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin Name: 0Well Depth: UnknownWell Type: UnknownWell Use: Not ReportedWell Name: 25073Station ID: 03S08W33C001SState Well #: 3 North 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADWR8000005975CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W33K002S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W33K002SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W33K002SWell ID: A2 ENE 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher CADWR0000005982CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W33K001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W33K001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W33K001SWell ID: A1 ENE 0 - 1/8 Mile Higher CADWR0000014455CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-21 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34L001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34L001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34L001SWell ID: 8 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000029973CA WELLS 349300Well Completion Rpt #: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin Name: 66Well Depth: Single WellWell Type: IrrigationWell Use: SILV-YLWell Name: 4583Station ID: 03S08W34F003SState Well #: 7 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR8000005969CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34E001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34E001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34E001SWell ID: 6 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000022740CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34M001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34M001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34M001SWell ID: 5 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADWR0000025152CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-22 ftWell Hole Depth Units: 98Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 98Well Depth: 19690725Construction Date: Unconfined single aquiferAquifer Type: AlluviumFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070203HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 003S008W34G002SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: B12 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138686FED USGS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34G002S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34G002SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34G002SWell ID: B11 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000003511CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3000759-001&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 02 WESTOther Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3000759-001Well ID: B10 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000012867CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34F001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34F001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34F001SWell ID: B9 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000000013CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-23 Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=79701&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DPR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 79701Other Name: Department of Pesticide RegulationSource: UNKWell Type: 79701Well ID: C16 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADPR0000002172CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: amp_date=&global_id=&assigned_name=USGS-335210117422801&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=USGSNEW&sGroundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: USGS-335210117422801Other Name: United States Geological SurveySource: UNKWell Type: USGS-335210117422801Well ID: B15 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAUSGSN00012250CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: _date=&global_id=&assigned_name=CLABOC-20&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=USGS&sampGroundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: CLABOC-20Other Name: United States Geological SurveySource: MUNICIPALWell Type: CLABOC-20Well ID: B14 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CAUSGS000000957CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=3000759-002&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DHS&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: WELL 01 EASTOther Name: Department of Health ServicesSource: MUNICIPALWell Type: 3000759-002Well ID: B13 ENE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADDW0000002531CA WELLS Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 18.78Feet below surface: 1999-04-01Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 16.4Feet below surface: 2004-10-26Level reading date: 2Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-24 7.8e-002Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 2.06Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 6.5Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: Not ReportedArea serve: 1Connection:32Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92808Zip: CAState:ANAHEIMCity: 24001 SANTA ANA CANYON RD.Address:Not ReportedHqname: Canyon Rv ParkSystem nam:3000759System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:WEST END OF LOT 15Comment 1: AUStatus:3Precision: 1174220.0Longitude:335140.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation ty:WELL 02 WESTSource nam: GWater type:3000759System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3000759001Frds no: 03S/08W-34G01 SPrim sta c:3660Seq: E19 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 3660CA WELLS Not ReportedGeoTracker Data: date=&global_id=&assigned_name=03S08W34C001S&store_num= https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_Groundwater Quality Data: Not ReportedGAMA PFAS Testing: 03S08W34C001SOther Name: Department of Water ResourcesSource: UNKWell Type: 03S08W34C001SWell ID: D18 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR0000032039CA WELLS Not ReportedWell Completion Rpt #: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin Name: 0Well Depth: UnknownWell Type: UnknownWell Use: Not ReportedWell Name: 4582Station ID: 03S08W34C001SState Well #: D17 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADWR8000005985CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-25 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.85Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 235.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 235.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.6Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1130.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 0.41Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.2Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 690.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.322Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.47Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.48Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 5.35Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.485Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.4Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-26 MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 778.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 310.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 740.Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1120.Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 4.4Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 967.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 290.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 5.5Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.47Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 131.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 123.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 7.6Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 103.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 22.8Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 94.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 329.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-27 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 136.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 7.5Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 104.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 22.6Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 92.2Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 323.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.95Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 256.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 256.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1170.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 7.8Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 135.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 154.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 320.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-28 MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 820.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1260.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 818.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 109.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 23.5Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 96.2Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 337.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.81Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 248.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 248.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1180.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.18Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 776.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.18Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 156.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-29 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 31.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 128.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 449.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 2.02Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 352.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 289.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1510.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1090.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: UNITSReport units:COLORChemical: 5.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 858.Finding:28-SEP-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1280.Finding:28-SEP-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 864.Finding:28-SEP-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1290.Finding:28-SEP-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1230.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-30 PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228Chemical: 9.4e-002Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.38Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1920.Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 2750.Finding:15-JAN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 916.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 4.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 380.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BARIUMChemical: 105.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 5.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.39Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 248.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 149.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 8.7Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 126.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-31 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1110.Finding:26-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 6.8Finding:26-JUN-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1560.Finding:26-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1Finding:26-JUN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 6.3Finding:07-NOV-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.217Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RA-226 FOR CWS OR TOTAL RA FOR NTNC BY 903.0Chemical: 3.7e-002Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.253Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.3Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.17Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.47Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 4.98Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.41Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.498Finding:09-APR-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-32 UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 280.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 5.9Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.43Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 126.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 116.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 6.8Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 98.3Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 21.2Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 89.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 309.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.76Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 267.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 219.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.9Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 996.Finding:05-DEC-12Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 5.3Finding:26-JUN-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-33 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 2.38Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 7.6Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: Not ReportedArea serve: 1Connection:32Pop serv: Not ReportedZip ext:92808Zip: CAState:ANAHEIMCity: 24001 SANTA ANA CANYON RD.Address:Not ReportedHqname: Canyon Rv ParkSystem nam:3000759System no: Not ReportedComment 7: Not ReportedComment 6:Not ReportedComment 5: Not ReportedComment 4:Not ReportedComment 3: Not ReportedComment 2:ANAHEIMComment 1: AUStatus:3Precision: 1174220.0Longitude:335140.0Latitude: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation ty:WELL 01 EASTSource nam: GWater type:3000759System no: TEEUser id:08District: 30County:3000759002Frds no: 03S/08W-34G02 SPrim sta c:3661Seq: E20 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 3661CA WELLS 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1020.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: UNITSReport units:COLORChemical: 5.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2050.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.11Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.1Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 598.Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 4.1Finding:17-JUL-12Sample date: 100.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-34 MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 242.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.6Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1150.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 0.42Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.21Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.4Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 700.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 MDA95Chemical: 0.322Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.47Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.28Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.32Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 4.16Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.496Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.506Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 9.6e-002Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 226Chemical: 4.e-002Finding:04-JAN-18Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-35 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1200.Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 0.52Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 4.8Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 310.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 7.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.48Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 131.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 127.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 8.3Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 106.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 23.8Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 98.1Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 343.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.91Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 242.Finding:27-APR-17Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-36 Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1270.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.19Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 802.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 5.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 949.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 330.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 6.7Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 165.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1170.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.2Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1180.Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.3Finding:28-DEC-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 728.Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 949.Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 0.42Finding:04-APR-16Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-37 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.19Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 802.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 5.4Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 340.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 6.8Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 163.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 136.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 8.5Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 114.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 24.7Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 106.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 366.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.82Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 274.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 274.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-38 MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 346.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 284.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1320.Finding:27-JUL-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 806.Finding:27-JUL-15Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 997.Finding:27-JUL-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 138.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 8.4Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 112.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 24.6Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 105.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 363.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.84Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 274.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 274.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1260.Finding:28-OCT-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-39 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BROMIDEChemical: 0.22Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 886.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 4.6Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 380.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 6.5Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.4Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 247.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 152.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 8.8Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 128.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 30.3Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 128.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 446.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.79Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-40 PCI/LReport units:URANIUM MDA95Chemical: 0.3Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.11Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM (PCI/L)Chemical: 3.43Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.525Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1010.Finding:17-JUL-14Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 881.Finding:17-JUL-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.94Finding:17-JUL-14Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 950.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1220.Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8Finding:08-OCT-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1280.Finding:15-JAN-15Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.Finding:15-JAN-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: UNITSReport units:COLORChemical: 5.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1490.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1010.Finding:13-APR-15Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-41 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 765.Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2400.Finding:28-JAN-14Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 756.Finding:28-JAN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 9.2Finding:28-JAN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:URANIUM COUNTING ERRORChemical: 0.998Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 901.Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.61Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1190.Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 3.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHAChemical: 5.28Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.88Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 1.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228Chemical: 7.7e-002Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RADIUM, TOTAL, MDA95-NTNC ONLY, BY 903.0Chemical: 0.418Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RA-226 OR TOTAL RA BY 903.0 C.E.Chemical: 0.338Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr:PCI/LReport units: RA-226 FOR CWS OR TOTAL RA FOR NTNC BY 903.0Chemical: 0.399Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: PCI/LReport units:RADIUM 228 MDA95Chemical: 0.2Finding:19-JUN-14Sample date: 0.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-42 UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 7.9Finding:04-OCT-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1450.Finding:21-JAN-13Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 866.Finding:21-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1Finding:21-JAN-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.97Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1110.Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 7.3Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 752.Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 5.1Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1350.Finding:11-APR-13Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 811.Finding:01-JUL-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2Finding:01-JUL-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1640.Finding:01-JUL-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.66Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 7.4Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2030.Finding:07-OCT-13Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-43 3.Dlr: UG/LReport units:VANADIUMChemical: 5.4Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 693.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 100.Dlr: UG/LReport units:BORONChemical: 270.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: UG/LReport units:ARSENICChemical: 7.4Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.5Dlr: MG/LReport units:SULFATEChemical: 147.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CHLORIDEChemical: 120.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:POTASSIUMChemical: 7.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:SODIUMChemical: 96.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:MAGNESIUMChemical: 20.8Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:CALCIUMChemical: 93.6Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 783.Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2870.Finding:02-JUL-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1790.Finding:04-OCT-12Sample date: 20.Dlr: UG/LReport units:MANGANESEChemical: 756.Finding:04-OCT-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6Finding:04-OCT-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-44 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 910.Finding:03-JAN-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 3.1Finding:03-JAN-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: MG/LReport units:FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.42Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: UNITSReport units:COLORChemical: 8.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: USReport units:SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 1010.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: Not ReportedReport units:PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 217.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 265.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.3Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON (TOC)Chemical: 1.74Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 319.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.4Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 2270.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.1Dlr: NTUReport units:TURBIDITY, LABORATORYChemical: 0.2Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 2.Dlr: MG/LReport units:NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 8.5Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: 0.Dlr: MG/LReport units:TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 676.Finding:02-APR-12Sample date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-45 Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 14.20Feet below surface: 1977-01-12Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.33Feet below surface: 1978-10-18Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.35Feet below surface: 1978-11-03Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 8.72Feet below surface: 1979-02-01Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 9.19Feet below surface: 1979-04-30Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 9.79Feet below surface: 1979-07-30Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.65Feet below surface: 1979-11-13Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 5.30Feet below surface: 1980-02-05Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.67Feet below surface: 1980-06-12Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.96Feet below surface: 1980-08-25Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 13.07Feet below surface: 1980-10-30Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 13.17Feet below surface: 1981-02-04Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.98Feet below surface: 1981-05-05Level reading date: The well was destroyed (no water level is recorded).Note: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: Not ReportedFeet below surface: 1981-07-27Level reading date: 37Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: ftWell Hole Depth Units: 45Well Hole Depth: Not ReportedWell Depth Units: Not ReportedWell Depth: 19450101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 18070203HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 003S008W34C001SMonitor Location: USGS California Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-CAOrganization ID: C21 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138720FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-46 Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.40Feet below surface: 1972-12-26Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.40Feet below surface: 1973-02-23Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.70Feet below surface: 1973-05-08Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.80Feet below surface: 1973-06-29Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 13.10Feet below surface: 1973-08-27Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 12.60Feet below surface: 1973-10-30Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.00Feet below surface: 1974-01-02Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 9.80Feet below surface: 1974-03-12Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.80Feet below surface: 1974-04-29Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.40Feet below surface: 1974-06-26Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.60Feet below surface: 1974-08-27Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 12.50Feet below surface: 1974-10-21Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.80Feet below surface: 1975-01-09Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.70Feet below surface: 1975-02-28Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.90Feet below surface: 1975-05-06Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 12.10Feet below surface: 1975-06-24Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 11.40Feet below surface: 1975-08-25Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.20Feet below surface: 1975-11-10Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 9.90Feet below surface: 1976-03-12Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 10.00Feet below surface: 1976-05-10Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 13.40Feet below surface: 1976-11-01Level reading date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-47 Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 13.30Feet below surface: 1972-08-28Level reading date: Not ReportedNote: Not ReportedFeet to sea level: 12.90Feet below surface: 1972-10-26Level reading date: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC6397650.2s Page A-48 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.763 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 30 Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 03292808 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC6397650.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5577 The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects. Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. California Earthquake Fault Lines Source: California Division of Mines and Geology The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-210-8558 Radon Database for California TC6397650.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC6397650.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Appendix F Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) OTH 2020-01264 PRELIMINARY CITY OF ANAHEIM Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Project Name: KINDRED CHURCH MASTER PLAN 8712-8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD APN 354-321-01 & 354-321-03 Prepared for: KINDRED OUTREACH MINISTRIES, INC. 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim, CA 92808 (714) 282-9941 Prepared by: Anacal Engineering Co. 1211 N. Tustin Avenue Anaheim, CA 92807 (714) 774-1763 – dave@anacalengineering.com Original Prepared date: February 24, 2020 Revision Date(s): 1) April 28th, 2021 2)September 20th, 2021 3)November 15, 2021 4)December 16, 2021 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Owner’s Certification Page i This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for Kindred Church Outreach ministries, Inc., by Anacal Engineering Co. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan , including the ongoing operation and maintenance of all best management practices (BMPs), and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non-point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. Owner: Title Company Kindred Church Outreach Ministries, Inc. Address 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon, Anaheim, CA 92808 Email Telephone # (714) 282-9941 I understand my responsibility to implement the provisions of this WQMP including the ongoing operation and maintenance of the best management practices (BMPs) described herein. Owner Signature Date Project Owner’s Certification Planning Application No. (If applicable) OTH 2020-01264 Grading Permit No. Tract/Parcel Map and Lot(s) No. Building Permit No. Address of Project Site: 8712 – 8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon, Anaheim APN 354-321-01 & 354-321-03 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Table of Contents Page iii Contents Page No. Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance .......... 1 Section II Project Description .................................................................................. 3 Section III Site Description ........................................................................................ 8 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) ...................................................... 10 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ................................. 24 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) .......................................................................... 25 Section VII Educational Materials ............................................................................. 26 Attachments Attachment A. ……………………………………………….…...BMP Calculations & Worksheets Attachment B …………………………….………..2-Year Storm Event Hydrology Calculations Attachment C ………………………………………….………..Operations and Maintenance Plan Attachment D ……………………………………………………………………….………..Soil Report Attachment E …………………………………………Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Form Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan . Section I Page 1 Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Provide discretionary or grading/building permit information and water quality conditions of approval, or permit issuance, applied to the project. If conditions are unknown, please request applicable conditions from staff. Refer to Section 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) available on the OC Planning website (ocplanning.net). Project Infomation Permit/Application No. (If applicable) OTH 2020-01264 Grading or Building Permit No. (If applicable) Address of Project Site (or Tract Map and Lot Number if no address) and APN 8712 – 8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, CA APN 354-321-01 & 354-321-03 Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance applied to this project. (Please list verbatim.) Conceptual WQMP Was a Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan previously approved for this project? There is an existing WQMP on the project from the previous Sanctuary construction done in 2004 under OTH 2004-00165 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan . Section I Page 2 Watershed-Based Plan Conditions Provide applicable conditions from watershed - based plans including WIHMPs and TMDLS. Santa Ana River Watershed No WIHMPs established TMDLS established for Santa Ana River Reach 2 Indicator Bacteria 2021 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section II Page 3 Section II Project Description II.1 Project Description Provide a detailed project description including: Project areas; Land uses; Land cover; Design elements; A general description not broken down by drainage management areas (DMAs). Include attributes relevant to determining applicable source controls. Refer to Section 2.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for information that must be included in the project description. Description of Proposed Project Development Category (From Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or -3): Commercial Development / Parking Lot Project Area (ft2): 259,549 Number of Dwelling Units: 3 SIC Code: 8661 Project Area Pervious Impervious Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Pre-Project Conditions 130,024 50.1% 129,525 49.9% Post-Project Conditions 87,445 33.7% 172,104 66.3% Drainage Patterns/Connections The majority of the site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing city storm drain constructed for Tract 12990 which traverses the site. Flow is Northerly to the Santa Ana River. Off-site flows are directed to two culvert crossings also connected to drainage facilities connected to the Santa Ana River. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section II Page 4 Narrative Project Description: The project consists of the development of 2 existing parcels to be merged into a redeveloped master plan for an expansion of the existing sanctuary and parking lots additionally there are non-permanent canopy structures along with new and relocated classrooms. Proposed is the relocation of 3 modular buildings and the addition of 4 modular buildings adding an area of 5,688 s.f onto the existing sanctuary for a total new building area of approximately 11,448 s.f. The proposed parking lot areas include the replacement of the water feature with a new parking lot in the campus center, the realignment and reduction of the southeast parking area for new modular buildings and a fabric building, and the addition of new planters in the existing lot north of the water feature. Total new or replaced parking and drive area is approximately 42,579 s.f. Total new or replaced hardscape area is approximately 45,838 s.f. New landscape areas are provided within parking lots, sanctuary area and slopes totalling 22,651 s.f. Total disturbed area consisting of construction/replacing of new impermeable and permeable area equates to a total area of 2.81 ac. We plan to capture the areas that drain towards the respective DMA’s which include capturing of the areas surrounding the disturbed areas, as a sort of run-on. This is why the plans show more treatment and capture than the disturbed area of 2.81ac. We are to capture the required DCV from the 85th percentile, 24-hr storm which is to equal 12,507 ft3, approximately treating 259,549 sf or 5.96 AC. This is done using 6 DMA’s as shown on the WQMP site plan. We plan to capture the volume using a new storm drain system that is to reliably drain the site towards a proposed underground infiltration area located north of the site. Prior to capture, pre-treatment will be provided using filterra units by Contech to filter at least 50% of the required flow per City of Anaheim requirements prior to entering the storm drain system. This filter is designed for full capture of sediment, debris and hydrocarbons. Flowrate calculations can be found in Attachment A. In the event of overflow, water is to be rerouted and tied to the existing main stormdrain system. The trash enclosures are proposed in the rear of the facility and are to be walled with rain tight lids. Existing and proposed slopes are to be planted and irrigated to prevent erosion. Food preparation and dining shall be done in roofed structures. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section II Page 5 II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Determine and list expected stormwater pollutants based on land uses and site activities. Refer to Section 2.2.2 and Table 2.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for guidance. Pollutants of Concern Pollutant Check One for each: E=Expected to be of concern N=Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended-Solid/ Sediment E X N Nutrients E X N Heavy Metals E X N Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E X N Bacteria is a pollutant of concern for Santa Ana River Pesticides E X N Oil and Grease E X N Toxic Organic Compounds E X N Trash and Debris E X N Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section II Page 6 II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Determine if streams located downstream from the project area are potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts. Refer to Section 2.2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for North Orange County or Section 2.2.3.2 for South Orange County. No – Show map Yes – Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Runoff from each DMA area; G, 3I, IF and 2F along with the adjacent run-on is calculated using TR20 software for the pre-construction and post-construction conditions. The results are indicated in the table below. Area 2F is considered 0 for a more conservative approach. We plan to capture that area completely, since this almost all pervious space will become an impervious parking lot. Area 4G is not considered as it is an existing parking lot with construction limited to the addition of permeable planters. Area 3G is not considered as it is all existing area with no development to take place. The disturbed area of the site is 2.81 AC and the capture area for the 2-year 24hr storms is 5.1 AC of the 14.8 AC site Designation Area Pre-const. runoff TR20 Post-const. runoff TR20 Pre-Const. TC min. Post- Const. TC Pre-Const V (cf) Post-Const V (cf) 1G 2.43 AC 0.423 in. 0.708 in. 6.0 6.0 3,731 6,245 3I 0.90 AC 0.103 in. 0.334 in. 6.0 6.0 337 1,212 1F 0.80 AC 0.092 in. 0.29 in. 6.0 6.0 267 842 2F 1.3 AC 0 1.078 in. 0 13.4 0 2,856 4,335 11,155 Δ Q2 = 11,155 cf – 4,335 cf = 6,820 cf BMP capture volume = 12,871 cf Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section II Page 7 II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Describe post development drainage characteristics. Refer to Section 2.2.4 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Drainage from the proposed project area drains to an existing city-maintained storm drain constructed for Tract 12990 Plan SP-1949. The proposed development has been broken into 6 DMAs based on their connection to the existing public storm drain. DMA 5 consists of various existing and proposed re-development and new construction that consists mainly of new building and sidewalk hardscape. The existing parking lot is slightly disturbed by replace planters for the reconstruction. The area is collected in existing and proposed grate inlets and to existing storm drains that connect to the public storm drain at a location approximately 300 ft. south of the crossing at Santa Ana Canyon Road. DMA-1 consists of new developed hardscape that is to be built on the existing water feature. This new hardscape will server as a new parking lot with planters. The drainage from the parking lot will flow north towards a filterra unit then to the proposed catch basin. DMA-3 and DMA-2 consists of the 2 relocated modular along with a new hardscape that replaces existing hardscape. Run-off is to drain to grate inlets routed towards the proposed storm drain system. DMA-3 drainage is to tie into DMA -4 storm drain system while DMA-2 is designed to outlet onto DMA-1 where it will be collected and treated in the same Filterra unit prior to entering the drainage system. DMA-3 & DMA-4 run-off is collected through an inlet that is located near the edge of the proposed landscape and tied to the existing storm drain line. This line captures the drainage coming in from DMA 3, 4, 5, and 6. All DMA’s draining to the catch basins will have FloGard filters and are designed to capture 100% trash & debris. See WQMP Site Plan for locations of catch basins & Filters. All drainage converges through the main storm drain line and are routed via junction boxes and ultimately to the proposed infiltration chambers. Total proposed redevelopment is 122,516 sf. Total mitigated area is 259,549 sf. II.5 Property Ownership/Management Describe property ownership/management. Refer to Section 2.2.5 in the Technical Guidance Document The property is owned and maintained by: Kindred Outreach Ministries, Inc. 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim, CA 92808 (714) 282-9941 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section III Page 9 Section III Site Description III.1 Physical Setting Fill out table with relevant information. Refer to Section 2.3.1 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Name of Planned Community/Planning Area (if applicable) Anaheim Hills Location/Address 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim General Plan Land Use Designation Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan Zoning T – Transitional Zone Acreage of Project Site 14.8 AC total, area of new development/disturbed = 2.81 AC Predominant Soil Type Quaternary Alluvial Deposits, HGS C Soils, according to TGD. III.2 Site Characteristics Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone 0.90” Topography Site is a previously graded terraced areas partially developed Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section III Page 10 Drainage Patterns/Connections The majority of the site drains to existing grate inlets that are connected to an existing city storm drain constructed for Tract 12990 which traverses the site. Flow is Northerly to the Santa Ana River. Off-site flows are directed to two culvert crossings also connected to drainage facilities connected to the Santa Ana River. Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties Soil report TGR Geotechnical # 15-5382 dated August 10, 2016. Report indicates as having infiltration rates of 2.8in/hr. Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions Ground water was found at 18.5’ in borings mapped to be at approx. 20’. No contamination site within 250’. A water well is located at the Northeast and Northwest corners of property and used for irrigation water. See WQMP site plan for well locations. Infiltration shall be 100’ from well site. Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration) None determined Off-Site Drainage Off-site drainage is captured in existing drainage courses and gutters and conveyed to downstream facilities which consist of (3) 60” storm drains crossing the 91 freeway to the Santa Ana River. Only adjacent run-on to DMA areas are considered in BMP design. All other areas are routed away from the proposed DMAs per the existing conditions. Utility and Infrastructure Information Site is served currently by water and electricity available through public easements. Sewer is septic. III.3 Watershed Description Fill out table with relevant information and include information regarding BMP sizing, suitability, and feasibility, as applicable. Refer to Section 2.3.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Receiving Waters Drains to Santa Ana River 303(d) Listed Impairments Indicator Bacteria Applicable TMDLs Indicator Bacteria 2020 Pollutants of Concern for the Project Bacteria Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section III Page 11 Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Significant Areas N/A to City of Anaheim Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 12 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria Describe project performance criteria. Several steps must be followed in order to determine what performance criteria will apply to a project. These steps include: If the project has an approved WIHMP or equivalent, then any watershed specific criteria must be used and the project can evaluate participation in the approved regional or sub- regional opportunities. (Please ask your assigned planner or plan checker regarding whether your project is part of an approved WIHMP or equivalent.) Determine applicable hydromodification control performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II- 2.4.2.2 of the Model WQMP. Determine applicable LID performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP. Determine applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria. Refer to Section 7.II-3.2.2 of the Model WQMP. Calculate the LID design storm capture volume for the project. Refer to Section 7.II-2.4.3 of the Model WQMP. (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis? YES NO X If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. N/A to City of Anaheim Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 13 Project Performance Criteria If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification control performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) Subject to Hydromodification. Provide for capture of 2 year storm. Delta Q2=6,820 c.f. See attachment A for calculations List applicable LID performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.3 from MWQMP) Priority project: Priority project must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire or biotreat/biofilter the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (design capture volume). √ol. Req = 0.9” – d (HSC) x c x area (ac) x 43, 560 sf/ac x 1”/12”ft = (C.F.) Where: d (HSC) – Source control depth c – Runoff co-efficient List applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria (Section 7.II-3.2.2 from MWQMP) Priority project: Priority project must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire or biotreat/biofilter the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (design capture volume) Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project. DCV (Design capture volume) for the project is 12,507 C.F. Find LID DCV calcs in attachment A Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 13 IV.2. Site Design and Drainage Describe site design and drainage including A narrative of site design practices utilized or rationale for not using practices; A narrative of how site is designed to allow BMPs to be incorporated to the MEP A table of DMA characteristics and list of LID BMPs proposed in each DMA. Reference to the WQMP “BMP Exhibit.” Calculation of Design Capture Volume (DCV) for each drainage area. A listing of GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs. Refer to Section 2.4.2 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Site runoff is directed away from proposed buildings and to permeable areas where practical. Portions of roof and rear yard areas drain to private storm drain system via proposed swales and storm drain inlets located in DMA 3, 4 & 5. We plan capture DMA 3, DMA 4, and DMA 5 which includes new hardscapes, new/relocated modular, the building expansion, and reconstruction of planters. DMA-5 contains very minimal disturbance, which includes landscape, roof and sidewalk area along with some reconstruction of planters, but no hardscape work in the parking lot. Since this area includes roadways and per the city/s requirements, we will capture DMA-5 and effectively treat 50% of the design flow prior to entering the drainage system. As for DMA-3 and DMA-4, no pretreatment is required since all runoff is roof, landscape and sidewalk areas. As such, the areas are to be tied directly into the storm drain system and head towards the infiltration chambers. DMA-1 involves the development of a new parking lot replacing the previous water feature. DMA 2 involves some reconstruction of the planters and the construction of additional parking area where the modular were previously placed. DMA-2 is to be captured through catch basins and will spill onto DMA-1. From there, the run-off accumulated by both DMA-s will enter a filterra device to undergo the 50% treatment requirement. After pretreatment the runoff is to tie into the existing storm drain which routes downstream to a junction structure and then to the proposed underground infiltration system located at the base of the site. The existing parking lot located north of the water feature is only to receive new striping and reconstructed planters. We are not planning on capturing this area of our site since very minimal disturbance will take place here. We are capturing DMA-6 where no new construction is to take place and treating this area as well as other undisturbed areas to offset not capturing the existing parking lot and drive areas. Total disturbed area=2,680sf whereas the captured area in DMA-6 is 26,573s.f. Our overall capture areas of DMA-1 through DMA-6 equate to almost double our disturbed area. This capture will mitigate the effects of HCOC as well as our DCV which is found to be greater than the 24-hr storm, thus making it design option. *Per the city of Anaheim WQMP template, we are capturing and infiltrating the DCV which was calculated using the areas tributary to the BMP. For treatment, we are using filterra units to bio-treat the runoff to a minimum of 50% the required flow with bypass capabilities to mitigate 100% of the DCV. Any overflow will exit through the underground chambers and tie back into the main storm drain line. See the WQMP Site plan for further clarification. *Full Trash Capture BMPs will be installed in each catch basin* Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 14 Area HSC Type BMP DCV cf Capture Volume GPS Coords. DMA-1 None INF-7 underground chambers 2,425 33.864242° 117.723238° DMA-2 None INF-7 underground chambers 1,614 33.86366° 117.72359° DMA-3 None INF-7 underground chambers 732 33.86528° 117.72278° DMA-4 None INF-7 underground chambers 1,967 33.86353° 117.72301° DMA-5 None INF-7 underground chambers 5,391 33.86412° 117.72189° DMA-6 None INF-7 underground chambers 378 33.86441° 117.72260° Overall: 12,507 12,626 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 16 IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis Each sub-section below documents that the proposed design features conform to the applicable project performance criteria via check boxes, tables, calculations, narratives, and/or references to worksheets. Refer to Section 2.4.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for selecting LID BMPs and Section 2.4.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for conducting conformance analysis with project performance criteria. IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) If required HSCs are included, fill out applicable check box forms. If the retention criteria are otherwise met with other LID BMPs, include a statement indicating HSCs not required. Name Included? Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) Other: HSCs not used Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 17 HSCs not required, LID DCV is reliably retained in underground infiltration chambers. IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Identify infiltration BMPs to be used in project. If design volume cannot be met, state why. Name Included? Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: Other: Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Strom Capture Volume can be met with infiltration BMPs. If not, document how much can be met with infiltration and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with infiltration BMPs. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 17 DMA-1 | Area=1.28 AC, Imp = 57%, DCV = 2,425 cf DMA-2 | Area=0.76 AC, Imp = 67%, DCV = 1,614 cf DMA-3 | Area=0.38 AC, Imp = 58%, DCV = 732 cf DMA-4 | Area=0.86 AC, Imp = 73%, DCV = 1,967 cf DMA-5 | Area=2.06 AC, Imp = 87%, DCV = 5,391 cf DMA-6 | Area=0.61 AC, Imp = 5% , DCV = 378 cf Overall DCV=12,507 cf Underground Infiltration Storage=12,626 cf See attachment A for Bmp calculations IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, describe any evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs included. Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other: Other: Other: Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with evapotranspiration and/or rainwater harvesting BMPs in combination with infiltration BMPs. If not, document below how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 19 IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs If the full Design Storm Capture Volume cannot be met with infiltration BMPs, and/or evapotranspiration and rainwater harvesting BMPs, describe biotreatment BMPs included. Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other: Other: Show calculations below to demonstrate if the LID Design Storm Capture Volume can be met with infiltration, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting and/or biotreatment BMPs. If not, document how much can be met with either infiltration BMPs, evapotranspiration, rainwater harvesting BMPs, or a combination, and document why it is not feasible to meet the full volume with these BMP categories. Not applicable Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 19 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs Describe hydromodification control BMPs. See Section 5 of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). Include sections for selection, suitability, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Detail compliance with Prior Conditions of Approval (if applicable). Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description INF-7 underground Chambers Provide Contech underground chamber system for req. 6,820 cf V prov. 12,626 cf IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Describe regional/sub-regional LID BMPs in which the project will participate. Refer to Section 7.II- 2.4.3.2 of the Model WQMP. Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs Not applicable Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 21 IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment control BMPs can only be considered if the project conformance analysis indicates that it is not feasible to retain the full design capture volume with LID BMPs. Describe treatment control BMPs including sections for selection, sizing, and infeasibility, as applicable. Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description Contech’s Filterra Bio-filtration Units are to be installed in their respective DMAs prior to entering the private storm drain system. They are to treat 50% of the design flow. Used Capture Efficiency Method, worksheet D for treatment flow. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 22 IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs Fill out non-structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if non- structural source controls were not used. Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants N2 Activity Restrictions N3 Common Area Landscape Management N4 BMP Maintenance N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) No CCRs N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance No use requiring N7 Spill Contingency Plan No hazardous waste storage N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance None N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance None N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation N11 Common Area Litter Control N12 Employee Training N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks None N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets None Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 23 IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs Fill out structural source control check box forms or provide a brief narrative explaining if structural source controls were not used. Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage S2 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction None allowed S3 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction S4 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) Not in San Diego Region S6 Dock areas None S7 Maintenance bays None S8 Vehicle wash areas None S9 Outdoor processing areas None S10 Equipment wash areas None S11 Fueling areas None S12 Hillside landscaping S13 Wash water control for food preparation areas S14 Community car wash racks None Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 24 IV.4 Alternative Compliance Plan (If Applicable) Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.II 3.0 in the WQMP. Not applicable IV.4.1 Water Quality Credits Determine if water quality credits are applicable for the project. Refer to Section 3.1 of the Model WQMP for description of credits and Appendix VI of the Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for calculation methods for applying water quality credits. Description of Proposed Project Project Types that Qualify for Water Quality Credits (Select all that apply): Redevelopment projects that reduce the overall impervious footprint of the project site. Brownfield redevelopment, meaning redevelopment, expansion, or reuse of real property which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants, and which have the potential to contribute to adverse ground or surface WQ if not redeveloped. Higher density development projects which include two distinct categories (credits can only be taken for one category): those with more than seven units per acre of development (lower credit allowance); vertical density developments, for example, those with a Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) of 2 or those having more than 18 units per acre (greater credit allowance). Mixed use development, such as a combination of residential, commercial, industrial, office, institutional, or other land uses which incorporate design principles that can demonstrate environmental benefits that would not be realized through single use projects (e.g. reduced vehicle trip traffic with the potential to reduce sources of water or air pollution). Transit-oriented developments, such as a mixed use residential or commercial area designed to maximize access to public transportation; similar to above criterion, but where the development center is within one half mile of a mass transit center (e.g. bus, rail, light rail or commuter train station). Such projects would not be able to take credit for both categories, but may have greater credit assigned Redevelopment projects in an established historic district, historic preservation area, or similar significant city area including core City Center areas (to be defined through mapping). Developments with dedication of undeveloped portions to parks, preservation areas and other pervious uses. Developments in a city center area. Developments in historic districts or historic preservation areas. Live-work developments, a variety of developments designed to support residential and vocational needs together – similar to criteria to mixed use development; would not be able to take credit for both categories. In-fill projects, the conversion of empty lots and other underused spaces into more beneficially used spaces, such as residential or commercial areas. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section IV Page 25 Calculation of Water Quality Credits (if applicable) Not applicable IV.4.2 Alternative Compliance Plan Information Describe an alternative compliance plan (if applicable). Include alternative compliance obligations (i.e., gallons, pounds) and describe proposed alternative compliance measures. Refer to Section 7.II 3.0 in the Model WQMP. Not applicable Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section V Page 26 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Fill out information in table below. Prepare and attach an Operation and Maintenance Plan. Identify the funding mechanism through which BMPs will be maintained. Inspection and maintenance records must be kept for a minimum of five years for inspection by the regulatory agencies. Refer to Section 7.II 4.0 in the Model WQMP. BMP Reponsible Party(s) Inspection/ Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities N1 - Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Owner Provide literature and instruction pertaining to environmental awareness included in Section VII Educational Material to all employees and residences. Once yearly and for new employees N2 - Activity Restrictions Owner See Attachment D for restrictions. Report any violations relating to activity restrictions listed herein. Continuous N3 - Common Area Landscape management Owner Hire contractor familiar with Orange County guidelines for use of fertilizers and pesticides. Maintain all landscape equipment improper working order. Monthly N4 - BMP Maintenance Owner See Attachment D for maintenance required. Continuous N11 - Common Area Litter Control Owner Inspect parking and trash areas, clean and dispose of all litter. Report any violations to the owner. Weekly Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section V Page 27 N12 - Employee Training Owner Educate all employees on environmental awareness. Instruct on proper use of chemicals and cleanup procedures. Once yearly prior to storm season N14 - Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Owner Inspect catch basin, clean debris; replace filters as required by manufacturer’s specifications. Repaint “No dumping-drains to ocean” with faces 40%. Bi-monthly from April 15 – October 15; Monthly from October 15 – April 15 N15 - Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Owner Sweep parking and drive areas. No hosing down of areas is allowed. Dispose of debris offsite. Once every two months from October 15 – April 15 Irrigation Owner Inspect for siltation or debris washing out of planters. Sweep silt to planters and check amount of irrigation used and for properly functioning irrigation. Check irrigation system for leaks and over spray, provide maintenance as required. Monthly Landscape Owner Check for landscape to be in healthy conditions. Replace dead or barren areas with plants consistent with the approved landscape plans. Monthly Trash Container Area Owner Inspect for spills and trash. Wipe clean spills and dispose of trash. Bi-weekly Catch Basin Inserts Owner Inspect catch basin, clean debris. Replace filters as required by manufacturer’s recommendations. Once prior to rainy season October 15 and after significant rain event Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section V Page 28 Contech’s Filterra Bio-filtration Owner Activation and first year maintenance is included. After the first year of maintenance, maintenance responsibly falls on the owner. This included inspecting the surrounding area and removing any trash or debris. Add mulch to a depth of 3”. Replace Filterra grates if applicable. See manufactures recommendations on Owners Manuel for more details in Section VII. Maintenance performed once per year before the rainy season on Oct.15th. See Owners Manuel for more information. Underground chambers Owner Inspect for standing water 48 hours after rain storm. Vacuum sediment when reaches 1/3 capacity. Once prior to rainy season – October 15 and after significant rainfall. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section VI Page 29 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) VI.1 BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) Include a BMP Exhibit (Site Plan), at a size no less than 24” by 36,” which includes the following minimum information: Insert in the title block (lower right hand corner) of BMP Exhibit: the WQMP Number (assigned by staff) and the grading/building or Planning Application permit numbers Project location (address, tract/lot number(s), etc.) Site boundary Land uses and land covers, as applicable Suitability/feasibility constraints Structural BMP locations Drainage delineations and flow information Delineate the area being treated by each structural BMP GIS coordinates for LID and Treatment Control BMPs Drainage connections BMP details Preparer name and stamp Please do not include any areas outside of the project area or any information not related to drainage or water quality. The approved BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) shall be submitted as a plan sheet on all grading and building plan sets submitted for plan check review and approval. The BMP Exhibit shall be at the same size as the rest of the plan sheets in the submittal and shall have an approval stamp and signature prior to plan check submittal. VI.2 Submittal and Recordation of Water Quality Management Plan Following approval of the Final Project-Specific WQMP, three copies of the approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be submitted. In addition, these documents shall be submitted in a PDF format. Each approved WQMP (including BMP Exhibit, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan, and Appendices) shall be recorded in the Orange County Clerk-Recorder’s Office, prior to close-out of grading and/or building permit. Educational Materials are not required to be included. SANTA ANA CANYON ROADLC CATCH BASIN DETAILANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANYCIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYINGCivil Engineering and Land SurveyingE N G I N E E R I N GA N A C A LAnaheimREVISIONS GRAPHIC SCALE( IN FEET ) Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Kindred Church Master Plan Section VII Page 30 Section VII Educational Materials Refer to the Orange County Stormwater Program (ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. Please only attach the educational materials specifically applicable to this project. Other materials specific to the project may be included as well and must be attached. Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Filterra Owners Manuel Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint Filterra Owner’s Manual ® Bioretention Systems ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS This Owner’s Manual applies to all precast Filterra Configurations, including Filterra Bioscape Vault. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 3 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................4 Activation Overview .....................................................................4 Filterra Plant Selection Overview ...................................................6 Warranty Overview ......................................................................6 Routine Maintenance Guidelines...................................................6 Maintenance Visit Procedure .........................................................9 Appendix 1 – Activation Checklist ...............................................12 Appendix 2 – Planting Requirements for Filterra Systems ................13 Appendix 3 – Filterra Tree Grate Opening Expansion Procedure ....15 ® Bioretention Systems ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-11224 Introduction Thank you for your purchase of the Filterra® Bioretention System. Filterra is a specially engineered stormwater treatment system incorporating high performance biofiltration media to remove pollutants from stormwater runoff. The system’s biota (vegetation and soil microorganisms) then further breakdown and absorb captured pollutants. All components of the system work together to provide a sustainable long-term solution for treating stormwater runoff. The Filterra system has been delivered to you with protection in place to resist intrusion of construction related sediment which can contaminate the biofiltration media and result in inadequate system performance. These protection devices are intended as a best practice and cannot fully prevent contamination. It is the purchaser’s responsibility to provide adequate measures to prevent construction related runoff from entering the Filterra system. Included with your purchase is Activation of the Filterra system by the manufacturer as well as a 1-year warranty from delivery of the system and 1-year of routine maintenance (mulch replacement, debris removal, and pruning of vegetation) up to twice during the first year after activation. Design and Installation Each project presents different scopes for the use of Filterra systems. Information and help may be provided to the design engineer during the planning process. Correct Filterra box sizing (by rainfall region) is essential to predict pollutant removal rates for a given area. The engineer shall submit calculations for approval by the local jurisdiction. The contractor is responsible for the correct installation of Filterra units as shown in approved plans. A comprehensive installation manual is available at www.ContechES.com. Activation Overview Activation of the Filterra system is a procedure completed by the manufacturer to place the system into working condition. This involves the following items: • Removal of construction runoff protection devices • Planting of the system’s vegetation • Placement of pretreatment mulch layer using mulch certified for use in Filterra systems. Activation MUST be provided by the manufacturer to ensure proper site conditions are met for Activation, proper installation of the vegetation, and use of pretreatment mulch certified for use in Filterra systems. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 5 Minimum Requirements The minimum requirements for Filterra Activation are as follows: 1. The site landscaping must be fully stabilized, i.e. full landscaping installed and some grass cover (not just straw and seed) is required to reduce sediment transport. Construction debris and materials should be removed from surrounding area. 2. Final paving must be completed. Final paving ensures that paving materials will not enter and contaminate the Filterra system during the paving process, and that the plant will receive runoff from the drainage area, assisting with plant survival for the Filterra system. 3. Where curb inlets are included as part of the Filterra system, Filterra throat opening should be at least 4” in order to ensure adequate capacity for inflow and debris. An Activation Checklist is included on page 12 to ensure proper conditions are met for Contech to perform the Activation services. A charge of $500.00 will be invoiced for each Activation visit requested by Customer where Contech determines that the site does not meet the conditions required for Activation. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-11226 Filterra Plant Selection Overview A Plant List is available on the Contech website highlighting recommended plants for Filterra systems in your area. Keep in mind that plants are subject to availability due to seasonality and required minimum size for the Filterra system. Plants installed in the Filterra system are container plants (max 15 gallon) from nursery stock and will be immature in height and spread at Activation. It is the responsibility of the owner to provide adequate irrigation when necessary to the plant of the Filterra system. The “Planting Requirements for Filterra Systems” document is included as an appendix and discusses proper selection and care of the plants within Filterra systems. Warranty Overview Refer to the Contech Engineered Solutions LLC Stormwater Treatment System LIMITED WARRANTY for further information. The following conditions may void the Filterra system’s warranty and waive the manufacturer provided Activation and Maintenance services: • Unauthorized activation or performance of any of the items listed in the activation overview • Any tampering, modifications or damage to the Filterra system or runoff protection devices • Removal of any Filterra system components • Failure to prevent construction related runoff from entering the Filterra system • Failure to properly store and protect any Filterra components (including media and underdrain stone) that may be shipped separately from the vault Routine Maintenance Guidelines With proper routine maintenance, the biofiltration media within the Filterra system should last as long as traditional bioretention media. Routine maintenance is included by the manufacturer on all Filterra systems for the first year after activation. This includes a maximum of 2 visits to remove debris, replace pretreatment mulch, and prune the vegetation. More information is provided in the Operations and Maintenance Guidelines. Some Filterra systems also contain pretreatment or outlet bays. Depending on site pollutant loading, these bays may require periodic removal of debris, however this is not included in the first year of maintenance, and would likely not be required within the first year of operation. These services, as well as routine maintenance outside of the included first year, can be provided by certified maintenance providers listed on the Contech website. Training can also be provided to other stormwater maintenance or landscape providers. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 7 Why Maintain? All stormwater treatment systems require maintenance for effective operation. This necessity is often incorporated in your property’s permitting process as a legally binding BMP maintenance agreement. Other reasons to maintain are: • Avoiding legal challenges from your jurisdiction’s maintenance enforcement program. • Prolonging the expected lifespan of your Filterra media. • Avoiding more costly media replacement. • Helping reduce pollutant loads leaving your property. Simple maintenance of the Filterra is required to continue effective pollutant removal from stormwater runoff before discharge into downstream waters. This procedure will also extend the longevity of the living biofilter system. The unit will recycle and accumulate pollutants within the biomass, but is also subjected to other materials entering the inlet. This may include trash, silt and leaves etc. which will be contained above the mulch layer. Too much silt may inhibit the Filterra’s flow rate, which is the reason for site stabilization before activation. Regular replacement of the mulch stops accumulation of such sediment. When to Maintain? Contech includes a 1-year maintenance plan with each system purchase. Annual included maintenance consists of a maximum of two (2) scheduled visits. Additional maintenance may be necessary depending on sediment and trash loading (by Owner or at additional cost). The start of the maintenance plan begins when the system is activated. Maintenance visits are typically scheduled seasonally; the spring visit aims to clean up after winter loads including salts and sands while the fall visit helps the system by removing excessive leaf litter. It has been found that in regions which receive between 30-50 inches of annual rainfall, (2) two visits are generally required; regions with less rainfall often only require (1) one visit per annum. Varying land uses can affect maintenance frequency; e.g. some fast food restaurants require more frequent trash removal. Contributing drainage areas which are subject to new development wherein the recommended erosion and sediment control measures have not been implemented may require additional maintenance visits. Some sites may be subjected to extreme sediment or trash loads, requiring more frequent maintenance visits. This is the reason for detailed notes of maintenance actions per unit, helping the Supplier and Owner predict future maintenance frequencies, reflecting individual site conditions. Owners must promptly notify the maintenance provider of any damage to the plant(s), which constitute(s) an integral part of the bioretention technology. Owners should also advise other landscape or maintenance contractors to leave all maintenance to the Supplier (i.e. no pruning or fertilizing) during the first year. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-11228 Exclusion of Services Clean up due to major contamination such as oils, chemicals, toxic spills, etc. will result in additional costs and are not covered under the Supplier maintenance contract. Should a major contamination event occur the Owner must block off the outlet pipe of the Filterra (where the cleaned runoff drains to, such as drop inlet) and block off the throat of the Filterra. The Supplier should be informed immediately. Maintenance Visit Summary Each maintenance visit consists of the following simple tasks (detailed instructions below). 1. Inspection of Filterra and surrounding area 2. Removal of tree grate (where applicable) and erosion control stones 3. Removal of debris, trash and mulch 4. Mulch replacement 5. Plant health evaluation and pruning or replacement as necessary 6. Clean area around Filterra 7. Complete paperwork Maintenance Tools, Safety Equipment and Supplies Ideal tools include: camera, bucket, shovel, broom, pruners, hoe/rake, and tape measure. Appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) should be used in accordance with local or company procedures. This may include impervious gloves where the type of trash is unknown, high visibility clothing and barricades when working in close proximity to traffic and also safety hats and shoes. A T-Bar or crowbar should be used for moving the tree grates, where applicable (up to 170 lbs each). If tree grate opening expansion is necessary, safety glasses/goggles and a 3lb or greater mini sledgehammer are required. Most visits require minor trash removal and a full replacement of mulch. See below for actual number of bagged mulch that is required in each media bay size. Mulch should be a double shredded, hardwood variety. Some visits may require additional Filterra engineered soil media available from the Supplier. Media Bay Length Media Bay Width Filter Surface Area (ft²)Volume at 3” (ft³)# of 2 ft³ Mulch Bags 4 4 16 4 2 6 4 24 6 3 8 4 32 8 4 6 6 36 9 5 8 6 48 12 6 10 6 60 15 8 12 6 72 18 9 13 7 91 23 12 Other sizes not listed - 1 bag per 8 ft² of media. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 9 1. Inspection of Filterra and surrounding area • Record individual unit before maintenance with photograph (numbered). Record on Maintenance Report (see example in this document) the following: 2. Removal of tree grate (if applicable) and erosion control stones • Remove cast iron grates for access into Filterra box (if applicable). • Dig out silt (if any) and mulch and remove trash & foreign items. 3. Removal of debris, trash and mulch • After removal of mulch and debris, measure distance from the top of the Filterra engineered media soil to the top of the top slab. Compare the measured distance to the distance shown on the approved Contract Drawings for the system. Add Filterra media (not top soil or other) to bring media up as needed to distance indicated on drawings. Record on Maintenance Report the following: Standing Water yes | no Damage to Box Structure yes | no Damage to Grate (if applicable) yes | no Is Bypass Clear yes | no If yes answered to any of these observations, record with close-up photograph (numbered). Record on Maintenance Report the following: Silt/Clay yes | no Cups/ Bags yes | no Leaves yes | no Buckets Removed ________ Record on Maintenance Report the following: Distance to Top of Top Slab (inches) ________ Inches of Media Added ________ Maintenance Visit Procedure Keep sufficient documentation of maintenance actions to predict location specific maintenance frequencies and needs. An example Maintenance Report is included in this manual. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-112210 4. Mulch replacement • Add double shredded mulch evenly across the entire unit to a depth of 3”. • Refer to Filterra Mulch Specifications for information on acceptable sources. • Ensure correct repositioning of erosion control stones by the Filterra inlet to allow for entry of trash during a storm event. • Replace Filterra grates (if applicable) correctly using appropriate lifting or moving tools, taking care not to damage the plant. • Where applicable, if 6” tree grate opening is too close to plant trunk, the grate opening may be expanded to 12” using a mini sledgehammer. Refer to instructions in Appendix 3. 5. Plant health evaluation and pruning or replacement as necessary • Examine the plant’s health and replace if necessary. • Prune as necessary to encourage growth in the correct directions 6. Clean area around Filterra • Clean area around unit and remove all refuse to be disposed of appropriately. 7. Complete paperwork • Deliver Maintenance Report and photographs to appropriate location (normally Contech during maintenance contract period). • Some jurisdictions may require submission of maintenance reports in accordance with approvals. It is the responsibility of the Owner to comply with local regulations. Record on Maintenance Report the following: Height above top of Filterra Unit __________________(ft) Width at Widest Point __________________(ft) Health healthy | unhealthy Damage to Plant yes | no Plant Replaced yes | no www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 11 Maintenance Checklist Filterra Inspection & Maintenance Log Filterra System Size/Model: _____________________________Location: ____________________________________________ Drainage System Failure Problem Conditions to Check Condition that Should Exist Actions Inlet Excessive sediment or trash accumulation. Accumulated sediments or trash impair free flow of water into Filterra. Inlet should be free of obstructions allowing free distributed flow of water into Filterra. Sediments and/or trash should be removed. Mulch Cover Trash and floatable debris accumulation. Excessive trash and/or debris accumulation. Minimal trash or other debris on mulch cover. Trash and debris should be removed and mulch cover raked level. Ensure bark nugget mulch is not used. Mulch Cover “Ponding” of water on mulch cover. “Ponding” in unit could be indicative of clogging due to excessive fine sediment accumulation or spill of petroleum oils. Stormwater should drain freely and evenly through mulch cover. Recommend contact manufacturer and replace mulch as a minimum. Vegetation Plants not growing or in poor condition. Soil/mulch too wet, evidence of spill. Incorrect plant selection. Pest infestation. Vandalism to plants. Plants should be healthy and pest free.Contact manufacturer for advice. Vegetation Plant growth excessive. Plants should be appropriate to the species and location of Filterra. Trim/prune plants in accordance with typical landscaping and safety needs. Structure Structure has visible cracks. Cracks wider than 1/2 inch or evidence of soil particles entering the structure through the cracks. Vault should be repaired. Maintenance is ideally to be performed twice annually. Date Mulch & Debris Removed Depth of Mulch Added Mulch Brand Height of Vegetation Above Top of Vault Vegetation Species Issues with System Comments 1/1/17 5 – 5 gal Buckets 3” Lowe’s Premium Brown Mulch 4’Galaxy Magnolia - Standing water in downstream structure - Removed blockage in downstream structure www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-112212 Appendix 1 – Filterra® Activation Checklist Project Name: ________________________________________Company: ______________________________________________ Site Contact Name: _______________________________________Site Contact Phone/Email: ____________________________ Site Owner/End User Name: _________________________Site Owner/End User Phone/Email: ____________________________ Preferred Activation Date: ___________________________________(provide 2 weeks minimum from date this form is submitted) Site Designation System Size Final Pavement / Top Coat Complete Landscaping Complete / Grass Emerging Construction materials / Piles / Debris Removed Throat Opening Measures 4” Min. Height Plant Species Requested Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No N/A NOTE: A charge of $500.00 will be invoiced for each Activation visit requested by Customer where Contech determines that the site does not meet the conditions required for Activation. ONLY Contech authorized representatives can perform Activation of Filterra systems; unauthorized Activations will void the system warranty and waive manufacturer supplied Activation and 1st Year Maintenance. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Signature Date ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 13 Appendix 2 – Planting Requirements for Filterra® Systems Plant Material Selection • Select plant(s) as specified in the engineering plans and specifications. • Select plant(s) with full root development but not to the point where root bound. • Use local nursery container plants only. Ball and burlapped plants are not permitted. • For precast Filterra systems with a tree grate, plant(s) must not have scaffold limbs at least 14 inches from the crown due to spacing between the top of the mulch and the tree grate. Lower branches can be pruned away provided there are sufficient scaffold branches for tree or shrub development. • For precast Filterra systems with a tree grate, at the time of installation, it is required that plant(s) must be at least 6” above the tree grate opening at installation for all Filterra configurations. This DOES NOT apply to Full Grate Cover designs. • Plant(s) shall not have a mature height greater than 25 feet. • For standard 21” media depth, a 7 – 15 gallon container size shall be used. Media less than 21” (Filterra boxes only) may require smaller container plants. • For precast Filterra systems, plant(s) should have a single trunk at installation, and pruning may be necessary at activation and maintenance for some with a tree grate of the faster growing species, or species known to produce basal sprouts. Plant Installation • During transport protect the plant foliage from wind and excessive jostling. • Prior to removing the plant(s) from the container, ensure the soil moisture is sufficient to maintain the integrity of the root ball. If needed, pre-wet the container plant. • Cut away any roots which are growing out of the container drain holes. Plants with excessive root growth from the drain holes should be rejected. • Plant(s) should be carefully removed from the pot by gently pounding on the sides of the container with the fist to loosen root ball. Then carefully slide out. Do not lift plant(s) by trunk as this can break roots and cause soil to fall off. Extract the root ball in a horizontal position and support it to prevent it from breaking apart. Alternatively the pot can be cut away to minimize root ball disturbance. • Remove any excess soil from above the root flare after removing plant(s) from container. • Excavate a hole with a diameter 4” greater than the root ball, gently place the plant(s). • If plant(s) have any circling roots from being pot bound, gently tease them loose without breaking them. • If root ball has a root mat on the bottom, it should be shaved off with a knife just above the mat line. • Plant the tree/shrub/grass with the top of the root ball 1” above surrounding media to allow for settling. • All plants should have the main stem centered in the tree grate (where applicable) upon completion of installation. • With all trees/shrubs, remove dead, diseased, crossed/rubbing, sharply crotched branches or branches growing excessively long or in wrong direction compared to majority of branches. • To prevent transplant shock (especially if planting takes place in the hot season), it may be necessary to prune some of the foliage to compensate for reduced root uptake capacity. This is accomplished by pruning away some of the smaller secondary branches or a main scaffold branch if there are too many. Too much foliage relative to the root ball can dehydrate and damage the plant. • Plant staking may be required. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-112214 Mulch Installation • Only mulch that meets Contech Engineered Solutions’ mulch specifications can be used in the Filterra system. • Mulch must be applied to a depth of 3” evenly over the surface of the media. Irrigation Requirements • Each Filterra system must receive adequate irrigation to ensure survival of the living system during periods of drier weather. • Irrigation sources include rainfall runoff from downspouts and/or gutter flow, applied water through the top/tree grate or in some cases from an irrigation system with emitters installed during construction. • At Activation: Apply about one (cool climates) to two (warm climates) gallons of water per inch of trunk diameter over the root ball. • During Establishment: In common with all plants, each Filterra plant will require more frequent watering during the establishment period. One inch of applied water per week for the first three months is recommended for cooler climates (2 to 3 inches for warmer climates). If the system is receiving rainfall runoff from the drainage area, then irrigation may not be needed. Inspection of the soil moisture content can be evaluated by gently brushing aside the mulch layer and feeling the soil. Be sure to replace the mulch when the assessment is complete. Irrigate as needed**. • Established Plants: Established plants have fully developed root systems and can access the entire water column in the media. Therefore irrigation is less frequent but requires more applied water when performed. For a mature system assume 3.5 inches of available water within the media matrix. Irrigation demand can be estimated as 1” of irrigation demand per week. Therefore if dry periods exceed 3 weeks, irrigation may be required. It is also important to recognize that plants which are exposed to windy areas and reflected heat from paved surfaces may need more frequent irrigation. Long term care should develop a history which is more site specific. ** Five gallons per square yard approximates 1 inch of water Therefore for a 6’ by 6’ Filterra approximately 20-60 gallons of water is needed. To ensure even distribution of water it needs to be evenly sprinkled over the entire surface of the filter bed, with special attention to make sure the root ball is completely wetted. NOTE: if needed, measure the time it takes to fill a five gallon bucket to estimate the applied water flow rate then calculate the time needed to irrigate the Filterra. For example, if the flow rate of the sprinkler is 5 gallons/minute then it would take 12 minutes to irrigate a 6’ by 6’ filter. www.ContechES.com/filterra | 800-338-1122 15 Appendix 3 – Filterra® Tree Grate Opening Expansion Procedure The standard grates used on all Filterra configurations that employ Tree Grates are fabricated with a 6” opening that is designed with a breakaway section that can be removed, allowing the grate opening to be expanded to 12” as the tree matures and the trunk widens. The following tools are required to expand the opening: • Mini sledgehammer (3 lb. or greater) • Safety Glasses / Goggles The following guidelines should be followed to properly expand the tree opening from 6” to 12”: 1. Remove the grate from the Filterra frame, place it flat on a hard surface, and support the grate by stepping on the edge or using other weighted items such as a few mulch bags if this is being done during a Filterra maintenance event. Put on safety glasses/goggles. Align the mini sledgehammer as shown in the figure to the left. The head of the sledgehammer should be aimed just inside the wide cast iron bar between the larger grate section and the breakaway section. 2. Repeatedly hit the grate at this spot with the mini sledgehammer. 3. After several hits, the breakaway section should snap cleanly off of the larger grate section. Reinstall the grate into the Filterra grate frame. Recycle or dispose of the breakaway section per local guidelines. PDF 6/21 © 2021 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC, a QUIKRETE Company 9025 Centre Pointe Drive, Suite 400 West Chester, OH 45069 info@conteches.com | 800-338-1122 www.ContechES.com ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN THE USA. NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A WARRANTY. APPLICATIONS SUGGESTED HEREIN ARE DESCRIBED ONLY TO HELP READERS MAKE THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS AND DECISIONS, AND ARE NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTIES OF SUITABILITY FOR ANY APPLICATION. CONTECH MAKES NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RELATED TO THE APPLICATIONS, MATERIALS, COATINGS, OR PRODUCTS DISCUSSED HEREIN. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED BY CONTECH. SEE CONTECH’S CONDITIONS OF SALE (AVAILABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION. ® Bioretention Systems ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS _______________________________________ Attachment A _______________________________________ Kindred Community Church BMP Calculations & Worksheets Site: 8712‐8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. APN: 354‐321‐01 & 354‐321‐03 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-44 May 19, 2011 INF-7: Underground Infiltration Underground infiltration is a vault or chamber with an open bottom that used to store runoff and percolate into the subsurface. A number of vendors offer proprietary infiltration products that allow for similar or enhanced rates of infiltration and subsurface storage while offering durable prefrabricated structures. There are many varieties of proprietary infiltration BMPs that can be used for roads and parking lots, parks and open spaces, single and multi-family residential, or mixed-use and commercial uses. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Infiltration bains shall pass infeasible screening criteria to be considered for use. x Underground infiltration galleries pose a potential risk of groundwater contamination; pretreatment should be used. Opportunity Criteria x Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to provide an adequate infiltration rate. x Appropriate for sites with limited surface space. x Can be placed beneath roads, parking lots, parks, and athletic fields. x Potential for groundwater contamination can be mitigated through isolation of pollutant sources, pretreatment of inflow, and/or demonstration of adequate treatment capacity of underlying soils. x Infiltration is into native soil, or depth of engineered fill is ≤ 5 feet from the bottom of the facility to native material and infiltration into fill is approved by a geotechnical professional. x Tributary area land uses include mixed-use and commercial, sngle-family and multi-family, roads and parking lots, and parks and open spaces. High pollutant land uses should not be tributary to infiltration BMPs. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) □ Minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 10 feet shall be observed. □ Minimum pretreatment should be provided upstream of the infiltration facility, and water bypassing pretreatment should not be directed to the facility. □ Underground infiltration should not be used for drainage areas with high sediment production potential unless preceded by full treatment control with a BMP effective for sediment removal. □ Design infiltration rate should be determined as described in Appendix VII. □ Inspection ports or similar design features shall be provided to verify continued system performance and identify need for major maintenance. Also known as: ¾ Infiltration vault ¾ Recharge vault Underground Infiltration Source: http://www.contech-cpi.com TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-45 May 19, 2011 □ For infiltration facilities beneath roads and parking areas, structural requirements should meet H-20 load requirements. Computing Underground Infiltration Device Size Underground infiltration devices vary by design and by proprietary designs. The sizing method selected for use must be based on the BMP type it most strongly resembles. x For underground infiltration devices with open pore volume (e.g., vaults, crates, pipe sections, etc), sizing will be most similar to infiltration basins. x For underground infiltration devices with pore space (e.g., aggregate reservoirs), sizing will be most similar to permeable pavement. Additional References for Design Guidance x Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 5: http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 1.28 .57 0.58 2,425 2.8 48 DMA-1 2.63 1.06 4.24 572 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 0.76 67% .65 1,614 2.8 48 DMA-2 2.63 1.06 4.24 381 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 0.38 .58 .59 732 2.8 48 DMA-3 2.63 1.06 4.24 172 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 0.86 73% .70 1,967 2.8 48 DMA-4 2.63 1.06 4.24 464 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 2.8 48 DMA-5 0.87 0.80 5,391 2.06 2.63 1.06 4.24 1,271 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-16 May 19, 2011 Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured×Sfinal Kdesign= In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= sq-ft 0.9 ------ 0.9 2.8 48 0.61 .05 .19 378 DMA-6 2.63 1.06 4.24 90 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES VII-35 May 19, 2011 Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate and Worksheet Factor Category Factor Description Assigned Weight (w) Factor Value (v) Product (p) p = w x v A Suitability Assessment Soil assessment methods 0.25 Predominant soil texture 0.25 Site soil variability 0.25 Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = 6p B Design Tributary area size 0.25 Level of pretreatment/ expected sediment loads 0.25 Redundancy 0.25 Compaction during construction 0.25 Design Safety Factor, SB = 6p Combined Safety Factor, STOT= SA x SB Measured Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KM (corrected for test-specific bias) Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = STOT × KM Supporting Data Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms: Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.25 1.50 0.50 0.75 0.25 0.25 1.75 2.63 2.8 1.06 Percolation testing was done utilizing the Porchet Method by TGR Geotechnical, Reference Project No. 15-5382 . Infiltration test rates were determined in general accordance with Orange County Public Works technical guidance document. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES VIII-13 May 19, 2011 Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria 1 Is project large or small? (as defined by Table VIII.2) circle one Large Small 2 What is the tributary area to the BMP? A acres 3 What type of BMP is proposed? 4 What is the infiltrating surface area of the proposed BMP? ABMP sq-ft 5 What land use activities are present in the tributary area (list all) 6 What land use-based risk category is applicable? L M H 7 If M or H, what pretreatment and source isolation BMPs have been considered and are proposed (describe all): 8 What minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater applies to the proposed BMP? See Section VIII.2 (circle one) 5 ft 10 ft 9 Provide rationale for selection of applicable minimum separation to seasonally high mounded groundwater: 10 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to seasonally high groundwater? SHGWT ft 11 What is separation from the infiltrating surface to mounded seasonally high groundwater? Mounded SHGWT ft 12 Describe assumptions and methods used for mounding analysis: 13 Is the site within a plume protection boundary (See Figure Y N N/A 5.96 Inf-7: Underground Infiltraiton -Community Church -Commercial Use We plan to use Contech Filterra bio-retention system to help treat the run-off prior to entering the proposed storm drain system. Based on Soil Engineers findings, groundwater was encountered previously at a depth of 18.5 ft below existing grade. 18.5' Used the "simulation of groundwater mounding" worksheet from USGS, see following pages for inputs and results. 6,200 3.3' TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES VIII-14 May 19, 2011 Worksheet I: Summary of Groundwater-related Feasibility Criteria VIII.2)? 14 Is the site within a selenium source area or other natural plume area (See Figure VIII.2)? Y N N/A 15 Is the site within 250 feet of a contaminated site? Y N N/A 16 If site-specific study has been prepared, provide citation and briefly summarize relevant findings: 17 Is the site within 100 feet of a water supply well, spring, septic system? Y N N/A 18 Is infiltration feasible on the site relative to groundwater- related criteria? Y N Provide rationale for feasibility determination: Note: if a single criterion or group of criteria would render infiltration infeasible, it is not necessary to evaluate every question in this worksheet. N/A Due to a good infiltration rate and criteria in the TGD, infiltration is deemed to be feasible. use consistent units (e.g. feet & days or inches & hours)Conversion TableInput Valuesinch/hourfeet/day2.4800RRecharge (infiltration) rate (feet/day)0.67 1.330.200Sy Specific yield, Sy (dimensionless, between 0 and 1)56.00 K Horizontal hydraulic conductivity, Kh (feet/day)*2.00 4.0077.500 x 1/2 length of basin (x direction, in feet)10.000 y 1/2 width of basin (y direction, in feet)hoursdays10.000 t duration of infiltration period (days)36 1.5013.500 hi(0) initial thickness of saturated zone (feet)16.799h(max) maximum thickness of saturated zone (beneath center of basin at end of infiltration period)3.299Δh(max) maximum groundwater mounding (beneath center of basin at end of infiltration period)Ground‐water Mounding, in feetDistance from center of basin in x direction, in feet3.29903.256203.120403.009502.860602.655702.398802.149901.9471001.635120DisclaimerThis spreadsheet will calculate the height of a groundwater mound beneath a stormwater infiltration basin. More information can be found in the U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010‐5102 "Simulation of groundwater mounding beneath hypothetical stormwater infiltration basins".The user must specify infiltration rate (R), specific yield (Sy), horizontal hydraulic conductivity (Kh), basin dimensions (x, y), duration of infiltration period (t), and the initial thickness of the saturated zone (hi(0), height of the water table if the bottom of the aquifer is the datum). For a square basin the half width equals the half length (x = y). For a rectangular basin, if the user wants the water‐table changes perpendicular to the long side, specify x as the short dimension and y as the long dimension. Conversely, if the user wants the values perpendicular to the short side, specify y as the short dimension, x as the long dimension. All distances are from the center of the basin. Users can change the distances from the center of the basin at which water‐table aquifer thickness are calculated.Cells highlighted in yellow are values that can be changed by the user. Cells highlighted in red are output values based on user‐specified inputs. The user MUST click the blue "Re‐Calculate Now" button each time ANY of the user‐specified inputs are changed otherwise necessary iterations to converge on the correct solution will not be done and values shown will be incorrect. Use consistent units for all input values (for example, feet and days)In the report accompanying this spreadsheet (USGS SIR 2010‐5102), vertical soil permeability (ft/d) is assumed to be one‐tenth horizontal hydraulic conductivity (ft/d). Re‐Calculate Now0.0000.5001.0001.5002.0002.5003.0003.5000 20406080100120140Groundwater Mounding, in feet _______________________________________ Design Treatment Calculations _______________________________________ Filterra Infiltration Rate =175 (in/hr) Filterra Flow per Square Foot =0.0041 (ft3/sec/ft2) Filterra Flow Rate, Q =0.0032 ft3/sec x Filterra Surface Area Rational Method, Q =C x I x A Site Flowrate, Q =(C x DI x DA x 43560) / (12 x3600) OR DA =(12 x 3600 x Q) / (C x 43560 x DI) where Q =Flow (ft3/sec) DA =Drainage Area (acres) DI =Design Intensity (in/hr) C =Runoff coefficient (dimensionless) DI C C C 0.2 1.00 0.85 0.50 Filterra 100%Commercial Residential L W Filterra Surface Area Flow Rate, Q Imperv. DA max DA max DA (ft)(ft)(ft2)(ft3/sec)(acres)(acres)(acres) 4 4 16 0.0648 0.321 0.378 0.643 4.5 4 18 0.0729 0.362 0.425 0.723 6 4 24 0.0972 0.482 0.567 0.964 6.5 4 26 0.1053 0.522 0.614 1.045 8 4 32 0.1296 0.643 0.756 1.286 12 4 48 0.1944 0.964 1.134 1.928 6 6 36 0.1458 0.723 0.851 1.446 8 6 48 0.1944 0.964 1.134 1.928 10 6 60 0.2431 1.205 1.418 2.410 12 6 72 0.2917 1.446 1.702 2.893 13 7 91 0.3686 1.828 2.151 3.656 14 8 112 0.4537 2.250 2.647 4.500 16 8 128 0.5185 2.571 3.025 5.142 12 8 96 0.3889 1.928 2.269 3.857 14 8 112 0.4537 2.250 2.647 4.500 Available Filterra Box Sizes Filterra Sizing Spreadsheet Uniform Intensity Approach Storm Intensity = 0.20 in/hr 9/4/2020 Using 8X6 & 10X6 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-24 May 19, 2011 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (T c) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Provide time of concentration assumptions: 6 min 0.25 ------ 0.25 1.28 57% 0.58 0.18 Drainage is mainly on impervious surface and through storm drain pipes. ------ ------ DMA-1 Using Contech's Filterra Device to pre-treat 50% of treatment flow prior to entering the stormdrain system. Overflow will be collected and bypassed using a catch basin. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-24 May 19, 2011 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (T c) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Provide time of concentration assumptions: 6 min 0.25 ------ 0.25 0.76 67% 0.65 0.12 Drainage is mainly on impervious surface and through storm drain pipes. ------ ------ DMA-2 Using Contech's Filterra Device to pre-treat 50% of treatment flow prior to entering the stormdrain system. Overflow will be collected and bypassed using a catch basin. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-24 May 19, 2011 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter the time of concentration, Tc (min) (See Appendix IV.2) Tc= 2 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the estimated time of concentration (T c) achieves 80% capture efficiency, I1 I1= in/hr 3 Enter the effect depth of provided HSCs upstream, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= inches 4 Enter capture efficiency corresponding to dHSC, Y2 (Worksheet A) Y2= % 5 Using Figure III.4, determine the design intensity at which the time of concentration (Tc) achieves the upstream capture efficiency(Y2), I2 I2= 6 Determine the design intensity that must be provided by BMP, Idesign= I1-I2 Idesign= Step 2: Calculate the design flowrate 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 4 Calculate design flowrate, Qdesign= (C x idesign x A) Qdesign= cfs Supporting Calculations Describe system: Provide time of concentration assumptions: 6 min 0.25 ------ 0.25 2.06 87% 0.80 0.41 Using FloGard filters for catch basins as pretreatment of Underground Infiltration Gallery. Using FloGard Model FGP-24F with a filtered flow capacity of 1.5 cfs and bypass capacity of 6.1 cfs. Calculated through drainage study. Drainage path is all impervious untill it reaches catch basin. ------ ------ DMA-5 TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES III-25 May 19, 2011 Worksheet D: Capture Efficiency Method for Flow-Based BMPs Graphical Operations Provide supporting graphical operations. See Example III.7. _______________________________________ Attachment B _______________________________________ Kindred Community Church 2‐Year Storm Event Hydrology Calculations Site: 8712‐8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. APN: 354‐321‐01 & 354‐321‐03 HYDROMODIFICATION Kindred Community Church 8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Anaheim, CA Prepared by: Prepared for: Anacal Engineering Co. Kindred Community Church 1211 N Tustin Ave. 100 Chaparral Court Ste. 100 Anaheim, CA 92807 Anaheim, CA 92808 (714) 774-1763 Prepared under the supervisions of: ___________________________________ David C. Queyrel RCE 42812 Exp. 3/31/22 Table of Contents Purpose Conclusion TR20 CALCULATIONS DCV CALCULATIONS Exhibits Existing Hydrology Map A Proposed Hydrology Map B Off-site topography map C Existing City Storm Drain Plans D Purpose The purpose of this report is to provide a run-off study based on Orange County LID manual for hydromodification and DCV purposes. Stormchamber design tool is designed to size facilities to handle the required volume based on the criteria. Proposed is a master plan for new parking and relocatable classrooms. A existing city of Anaheim storm drain traverses the property and is designed to accept a portion of the project area. Additionally, there are two 60” culverts which drain the project area north to the Santa Ana River. Drainage from a portion of the existing parking lot and new parking areas are development with low impact criteria designed to infiltrate the design capture volume. Conclusion The study shows that runoff from the new development site can be infiltrated on-site in accordance with the current Orange county LID manual. The hydromodification criteria is achieved in accordance with the manual and concluded that the project has no detrimental effects on downstream drainage. WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA G PRE 0.004 0.423 9.95 0.60 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.688 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 9.732 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 9.776 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 9.820 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.32 9.864 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.50 9.909 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.59 0.59 0.60 9.953 0.60 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 9.997 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.56 10.041 0.54 0.52 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.41 0.38 10.085 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.27 10.130 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.23 10.174 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.218 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.262 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.306 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.351 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 10.395 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 10.439 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 10.483 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 10.528 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 10.572 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.616 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.660 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.704 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.749 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.793 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.837 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.881 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.925 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.970 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.014 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.058 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.102 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.146 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.191 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.235 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.279 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.323 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.368 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.412 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 11.456 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.500 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.544 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.589 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.633 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.677 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.721 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.765 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.810 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.854 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.898 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.942 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.986 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.031 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.075 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.119 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.163 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.208 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.252 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.296 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.340 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.384 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.429 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.473 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.517 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.561 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.605 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 12.650 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.694 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.738 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.782 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.826 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.871 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.915 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.959 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.003 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.048 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.092 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.136 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.180 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.224 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.269 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.313 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.357 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.401 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.445 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.490 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.534 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.578 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.622 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.666 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 8:39 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 13.711 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.755 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.799 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.843 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.888 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.932 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.976 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.020 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.064 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.109 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.153 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.197 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.241 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.285 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.330 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.374 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.418 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.462 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.506 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.551 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.595 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.639 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.683 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.728 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.772 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.816 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.860 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.904 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.949 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.993 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 15.037 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.081 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.125 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.170 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.214 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.258 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.302 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.346 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.391 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.435 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.479 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.523 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.568 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.612 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.656 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.700 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.744 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.789 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.833 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.877 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.921 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 15.965 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.010 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.054 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.098 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.142 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.186 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.231 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 16.275 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.319 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.363 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.408 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.540 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.584 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.629 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.673 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.717 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.761 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.805 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.850 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.894 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.938 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.982 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.026 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.071 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.115 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.159 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.203 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.248 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.292 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.336 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.380 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.424 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.469 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.513 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.557 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.601 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.645 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.690 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.734 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.778 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.822 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.866 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.911 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 17.955 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.999 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.043 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.088 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.132 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.176 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 4 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 18.220 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.264 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.309 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.353 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.397 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.441 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.485 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.530 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.574 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.618 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.662 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.706 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.751 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.795 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.839 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.883 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.928 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.972 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.016 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.060 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.104 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.149 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 19.193 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.237 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.281 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.325 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.370 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.414 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.458 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.502 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.546 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.591 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.635 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.679 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.723 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.768 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.812 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.856 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.900 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.944 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.989 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.033 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.077 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.121 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.165 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.210 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.254 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.298 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.342 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.386 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.431 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 5 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 6 9/18/2020 8:39:52 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 20.475 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.519 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.563 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.608 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.652 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.696 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.740 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.784 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.829 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.873 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.917 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.961 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.005 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.050 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.094 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.138 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.004 0.423 9.95 0.60 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.688 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 9.732 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 9.776 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 9.820 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.32 9.864 0.34 0.37 0.40 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.50 9.909 0.52 0.54 0.56 0.58 0.59 0.59 0.60 9.953 0.60 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 9.997 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.58 0.57 0.56 10.041 0.54 0.52 0.49 0.46 0.43 0.41 0.38 10.085 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.27 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 7 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 10.130 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.23 10.174 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.218 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.262 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.306 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.351 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 10.395 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 10.439 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 10.483 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 10.528 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 10.572 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.616 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.660 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.704 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 6 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.749 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.793 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.837 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.881 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.925 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.970 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.014 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.058 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.102 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.146 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.191 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 11.235 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.279 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.323 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 8 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 11.368 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.412 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.456 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.500 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.544 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.589 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.633 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.677 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.721 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.765 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.810 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.854 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.898 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.942 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.986 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.031 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.075 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.119 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.163 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.208 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.252 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.296 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.340 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.384 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.429 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.473 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.517 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.561 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 12.605 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 12.650 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.694 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.738 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.782 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.826 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.871 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.915 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 12.959 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 9 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 7 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 13.003 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.048 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.092 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.136 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.180 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.224 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.269 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 13.313 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.357 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.401 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.445 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.490 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.534 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.578 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.622 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.666 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.711 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.755 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.799 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.843 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 13.888 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.932 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.976 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.020 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.064 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.109 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.153 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.197 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.241 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 10 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 14.285 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.330 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.374 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.418 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.462 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.506 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.551 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.595 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.639 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.683 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.728 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.772 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.816 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.860 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.904 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.949 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 14.993 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.037 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.081 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.125 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.170 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.214 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 8 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 15.258 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.302 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.346 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.391 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.435 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.479 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 11 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 15.523 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.568 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.612 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.656 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.700 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.744 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.789 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.833 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.877 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.921 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 15.965 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.010 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.054 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.098 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.142 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.186 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.231 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.275 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.319 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.363 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.408 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.540 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.584 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.629 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.673 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.717 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.761 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.805 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.850 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.894 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.938 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 16.982 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.026 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.071 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.115 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.159 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 12 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 17.203 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 17.248 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.292 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.336 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.380 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.424 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.469 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 9 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 17.513 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.557 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.601 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.645 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.690 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.734 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.778 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.822 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.866 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.911 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.955 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 17.999 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.043 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.088 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.132 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.176 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.220 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.264 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.309 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.353 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.397 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 13 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 18.441 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.485 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.530 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.574 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.618 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.662 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.706 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.751 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.795 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.839 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.883 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.928 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 18.972 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.016 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.060 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.104 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.149 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.193 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.237 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.281 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.325 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.370 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.414 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.458 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.502 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.546 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.591 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.635 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.679 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.723 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 10 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 14 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 19.768 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.812 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.856 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.900 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.944 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 19.989 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.033 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.077 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.121 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.165 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.210 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.254 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.298 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.342 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.386 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.431 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.475 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.519 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.563 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.608 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.652 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.696 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.740 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.784 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.829 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.873 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.917 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 20.961 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.005 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.050 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.094 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 21.138 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 15 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 11 09/18/2020 8:39 KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA G PRE 0.004 0.60 OUTLET 0.004 0.60 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 16 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 17 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA G PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G PRE Outlet .0038 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 12 09/18/2020 8:39 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 18 9/18/2020 8:39:53 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: AREA G PRE Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA G-PRE.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA G PRE Outlet 2.43 77 0.1 Total area: 2.43 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA G PRE 0.60 REACHES OUTLET 0.60 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA G PRE 0.60 9.95 REACHES OUTLET 0.60 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G PRE 2.43 0.100 77 Outlet Total Area: 2.43 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G PRE SHEET 100 0.0200 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 240 0.0150 0.025 0.027 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA G PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G PRE Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .86 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A 1.57 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 2.43 77 ==== == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:41:14 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA G POST 0.004 0.708 9.94 1.19 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.178 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 9.222 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.267 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.311 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 9.355 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 9.399 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 9.443 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 9.488 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 9.532 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.576 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 9.620 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 9.665 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 9.709 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.34 9.753 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 9.797 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.55 0.58 0.61 9.841 0.65 0.69 0.74 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.94 9.886 0.98 1.03 1.07 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.18 9.930 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.14 9.974 1.13 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.07 10.018 1.06 1.04 1.02 0.99 0.94 0.90 0.84 10.062 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.60 0.57 0.54 10.107 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.46 0.44 0.43 0.42 10.151 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.37 10.195 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.35 10.239 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.33 10.283 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 10.328 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30 10.372 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28 10.416 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27 10.460 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 10.505 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 10.549 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 10.593 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.637 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.681 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.726 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 10.770 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.814 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.858 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.902 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.947 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 10.991 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 11.035 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 11.079 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 11.123 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.168 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.212 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.256 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.300 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.345 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.389 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.433 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.477 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.521 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.566 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.610 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.654 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.698 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.742 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.787 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.831 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.875 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.919 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.963 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 12.008 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 12.052 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 12.096 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.140 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.185 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.229 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.273 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.317 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.361 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.406 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.450 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.494 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.538 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.582 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.627 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.671 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.715 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.759 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.803 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.848 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.892 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.936 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.980 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 13.025 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.069 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.113 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.157 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 8:48 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 13.201 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.246 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.290 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.334 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.378 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.422 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 13.467 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.511 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.555 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.599 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.643 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.688 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.732 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.776 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.820 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.865 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.909 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.953 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.997 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.041 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.086 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.130 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.174 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.218 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.262 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.307 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.351 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.395 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.439 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.483 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 14.528 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.572 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.616 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.660 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.705 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.749 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.793 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.837 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.881 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.926 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.970 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.014 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.058 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.102 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 15.147 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.191 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.235 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.279 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.323 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.368 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.412 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 15.456 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.500 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.545 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.589 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.633 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.677 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.721 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 15.766 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.810 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.854 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.898 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.942 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.987 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.031 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.075 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.119 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.163 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.208 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.252 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.296 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.340 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.385 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.429 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.473 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.517 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.561 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.606 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.650 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.694 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.738 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.782 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.827 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.871 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.915 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.959 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.003 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.048 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.092 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.136 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.180 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.225 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.269 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.313 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.357 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 17.401 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 17.446 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.490 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.534 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.578 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.622 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.667 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 4 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 17.711 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.755 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.799 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.843 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.888 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.932 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.976 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.020 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.065 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.109 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.153 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.197 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.241 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.286 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.330 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.374 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.418 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.462 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.507 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.551 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.595 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.639 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 18.683 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.728 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.772 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.816 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.860 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.905 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.949 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.993 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.037 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.081 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.126 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.170 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.214 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.258 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.302 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.347 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.391 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.435 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.479 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.523 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.568 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.612 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.656 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.700 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.745 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.789 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.833 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.877 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.921 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 5 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 6 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 19.966 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.010 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.054 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.098 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.142 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.187 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.231 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.275 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.319 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.363 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.408 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.540 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.585 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.629 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.673 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.717 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.761 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.806 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.850 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.894 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.938 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.982 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.027 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.071 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.115 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.159 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.203 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.248 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.292 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.336 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.380 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.425 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.469 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.513 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.557 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 7 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 21.601 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.646 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.690 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.734 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.778 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.822 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.867 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.911 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.955 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.999 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.043 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.088 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.132 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.176 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 6 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 22.220 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.265 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.309 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.353 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.397 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.441 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.486 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.530 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.574 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.618 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.662 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.707 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.751 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.795 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 8 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 22.839 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.883 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.928 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.972 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.016 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.060 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.105 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.149 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.193 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.237 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.281 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.326 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.004 0.708 9.94 1.19 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.178 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 9.222 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.267 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.311 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 9.355 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 9.399 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 9.443 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 9.488 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 9.532 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.576 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 9.620 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.20 9.665 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 9.709 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.30 0.32 0.34 9.753 0.35 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 9 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 7 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.797 0.49 0.50 0.52 0.53 0.55 0.58 0.61 9.841 0.65 0.69 0.74 0.79 0.84 0.89 0.94 9.886 0.98 1.03 1.07 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.18 9.930 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.14 9.974 1.13 1.11 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.08 1.07 10.018 1.06 1.04 1.02 0.99 0.94 0.90 0.84 10.062 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.64 0.60 0.57 0.54 10.107 0.51 0.49 0.47 0.46 0.44 0.43 0.42 10.151 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.37 10.195 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.35 10.239 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.33 10.283 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 10.328 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.30 0.30 0.30 10.372 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.28 0.28 10.416 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.27 10.460 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 10.505 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 10.549 0.24 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 10.593 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.637 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.681 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 10.726 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 0.20 10.770 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.814 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 10.858 0.20 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.902 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.947 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 10.991 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 11.035 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 10 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 11.079 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 11.123 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.168 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.212 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.256 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.300 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.345 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.389 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.433 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 11.477 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.521 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.566 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.610 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.654 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.698 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.742 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 11.787 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.831 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.875 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.919 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 11.963 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 12.008 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 8 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.052 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 12.096 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.140 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.185 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.229 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.273 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 11 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 12.317 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.361 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.406 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.450 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.494 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.538 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 12.582 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.627 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.671 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.715 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.759 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.803 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.848 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.892 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.936 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 12.980 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 13.025 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.069 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.113 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.157 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.201 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.246 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.290 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.334 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.378 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 13.422 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 13.467 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.511 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.555 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.599 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.643 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.688 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.732 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.776 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 13.820 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.865 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.909 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 13.953 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 12 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 13.997 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.041 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.086 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.130 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.174 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.218 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.262 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 9 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 14.307 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.351 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.395 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.439 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.483 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.528 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.572 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.616 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.660 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.705 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.749 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.793 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.837 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.881 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.926 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 14.970 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.014 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.058 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 15.102 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 15.147 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.191 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 13 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 15.235 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.279 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.323 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.368 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.412 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.456 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.500 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.545 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.589 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.633 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.677 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.721 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.766 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.810 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.854 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.898 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.942 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 15.987 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.031 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.075 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.119 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.163 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.208 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.252 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.296 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.340 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.385 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.429 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.473 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.517 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 10 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 14 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 16.561 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.606 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.650 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.694 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.738 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.782 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.827 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.871 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.915 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 16.959 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.003 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.048 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.092 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.136 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.180 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.225 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.269 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.313 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 17.357 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 17.401 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.446 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.490 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.534 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.578 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.622 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.667 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.711 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.755 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.799 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.843 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.888 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.932 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 17.976 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.020 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.065 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.109 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 15 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 18.153 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.197 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.241 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.286 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.330 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.374 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.418 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.462 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.507 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.551 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.595 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.639 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.683 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.728 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.772 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 11 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 18.816 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.860 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.905 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.949 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 18.993 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.037 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.081 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.126 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.170 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.214 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 19.258 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.302 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.347 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 16 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 19.391 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.435 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.479 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.523 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.568 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.612 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.656 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.700 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.745 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.789 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.833 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.877 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.921 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 19.966 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.010 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.054 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.098 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.142 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.187 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.231 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.275 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.319 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.363 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.408 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.540 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.585 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.629 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.673 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.717 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.761 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.806 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.850 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.894 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.938 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 20.982 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.027 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 17 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 12 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 21.071 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.115 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.159 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.203 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.248 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.292 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.336 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.380 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.425 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.469 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.513 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.557 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.601 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.646 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.690 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.734 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.778 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.822 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.867 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.911 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.955 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 21.999 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.043 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.088 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.132 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.176 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.220 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.265 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 18 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 22.309 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.353 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.397 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.441 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.486 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.530 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 22.574 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.618 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.662 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.707 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.751 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.795 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.839 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.883 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.928 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 22.972 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.016 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.060 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.105 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.149 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.193 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.237 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 23.281 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 13 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 23.326 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 19 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 20 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 14 09/18/2020 8:48 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA G POST 0.004 1.19 OUTLET 0.004 1.19 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 21 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA G POSTOutlet .0038 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 15 09/18/2020 8:48 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 22 9/18/2020 8:49:21 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA G-POST.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA G POST Outlet 2.43 83 0.1 Total area: 2.43 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA G POST 1.19 REACHES OUTLET 1.19 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA G POST 1.19 9.94 REACHES OUTLET 1.19 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G POST 2.43 0.100 83 Outlet Total Area: 2.43 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G POST SHEET 100 0.0050 0.011 0.044 SHALLOW 240 0.0270 0.025 0.020 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA G POSTOpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .607 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A 1.82 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 2.43 83 ==== == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 8:49:56 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA 3I-PRE 0.001 0.103 9.95 0.22 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.782 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 9.826 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 9.871 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.19 9.915 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 9.959 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.003 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.20 10.048 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 10.092 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.136 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 10.180 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.224 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.269 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.313 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.357 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.401 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 10.445 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.490 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.534 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.578 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.622 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.666 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.711 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.001 0.103 9.95 0.22 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.782 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 9.826 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 9.871 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.19 9.915 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 9.959 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.003 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.20 10.048 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 9:25 KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.092 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.136 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 10.180 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.224 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.269 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.313 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.357 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.401 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 10.445 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.490 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.534 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.578 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.622 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.666 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.711 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 9:25 KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA 3I-PRE 0.001 0.22 OUTLET 0.001 0.22 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 9:25 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 6 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA I PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-PREOutlet .00141 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 7 9/18/2020 9:25:57 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: AREA I PRE Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA I-PRE.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA 3I-PRE Outlet 0.9 77 0.1 Total area: .90 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA 3I-PRE 0.22 REACHES OUTLET 0.22 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA 3I-PRE 0.22 9.95 REACHES OUTLET 0.22 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-PRE .90 0.100 77 Outlet Total Area: .90 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-PRE SHEET 100 0.0200 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 170 0.0150 0.025 0.019 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA I PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-PREOpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .315 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A .585 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .9 77 == == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:26:19 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-POSOutlet .00141 83. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA 3I-POS 0.001 0.334 9.94 0.44 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.589 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.633 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 9.677 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.721 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14 9.766 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.19 9.810 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.26 9.854 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.37 0.38 9.898 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 9.942 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.41 9.987 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.39 10.031 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.27 10.075 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 10.119 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 10.163 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 10.208 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.252 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.296 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.340 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.385 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.429 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.473 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.517 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.561 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.606 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.650 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.694 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.738 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.782 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.827 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.871 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.915 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.959 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.003 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.048 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.092 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 11.136 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.180 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.225 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.269 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.313 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 9:27 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 11.357 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.401 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.446 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.490 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.534 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.578 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.622 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.667 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.711 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.755 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.799 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.843 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.888 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.932 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.976 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.020 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.065 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.109 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.153 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.197 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.241 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.286 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.330 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.374 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.418 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.462 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.507 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.551 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.595 0.05 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.001 0.334 9.94 0.44 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.589 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.633 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 9.677 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.721 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14 9.766 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.19 9.810 0.19 0.20 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.26 9.854 0.28 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.37 0.38 9.898 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.43 0.44 0.44 0.44 9.942 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.43 0.42 0.42 0.41 9.987 0.41 0.41 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.39 0.39 10.031 0.38 0.37 0.35 0.33 0.31 0.29 0.27 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 9:27 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.075 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 10.119 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 10.163 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 10.208 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.252 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:35 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-POSOutlet .00141 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 10.296 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.340 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.385 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.429 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.473 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.517 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.561 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.606 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.650 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.694 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.738 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.782 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.827 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.871 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.915 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.959 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.003 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.048 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 11.092 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 11.136 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.180 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.225 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.269 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.313 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.357 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.401 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.446 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.490 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.534 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.578 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.622 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.667 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.711 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.755 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.799 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.843 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.888 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.932 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.976 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.020 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.065 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.109 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.153 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.197 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.241 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.286 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 9:27 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.330 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.374 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.418 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.462 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.507 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 12.551 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 9:27:35 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-POSOutlet .00141 83. .1 STREAM REACH: 12.595 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 4 09/18/2020 9:27 KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA 3I-POS 0.001 0.44 OUTLET 0.001 0.44 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 9:27:35 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA 3I-POSOutlet .00141 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 5 09/18/2020 9:27 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 9:27:35 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA I-POST.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA 3I-POS Outlet 0.9 83 0.1 Total area: .90 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA 3I-POS 0.44 REACHES OUTLET 0.44 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA 3I-POS 0.44 9.94 REACHES OUTLET 0.44 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-POS .90 0.100 83 Outlet Total Area: .90 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-POS SHEET 100 0.0200 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 170 0.0150 0.025 0.019 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 2YEAR HYDRO ANALYSIS Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA 3I-POSOpen space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .225 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A .675 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .9 83 == == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:27:59 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) 1F PRE 0.001 0.092 9.95 0.20 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.795 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 9.839 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 9.883 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 9.928 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 9.972 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.016 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.16 10.060 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 10.104 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 10.149 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.193 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.237 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.281 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.325 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.370 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.414 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.458 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 10.502 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 1F PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.001 0.092 9.95 0.20 157.31 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.795 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 9.839 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.12 0.13 9.883 0.14 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.18 9.928 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 9.972 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 10.016 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.16 10.060 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 10.104 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 10.149 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.193 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.237 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.281 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 9:31 KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.325 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.370 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.414 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.458 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 1F PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: 10.502 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 1F PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 9:31 KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 1F PRE 0.001 0.20 OUTLET 0.001 0.20 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 1F PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) 1F PRE STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 1F PRE Outlet .00125 77. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 9:31 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 6 9/18/2020 9:32:46 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: 1F PRE Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA 1F-PRE.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1F PRE Outlet 0.8 77 0.1 Total area: .80 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS 1F PRE 0.20 REACHES OUTLET 0.20 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS 1F PRE 0.20 9.95 REACHES OUTLET 0.20 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1F PRE .80 0.100 77 Outlet Total Area: .80 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1F PRE SHEET 100 0.0200 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 125 0.0200 0.025 0.012 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH 1F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1F PRE Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .28 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A .52 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .8 77 == == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 9:33:08 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00125 83. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA-AREA 1 0.001 0.290 9.94 0.39 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.620 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.665 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 9.709 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 9.753 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 9.797 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 9.841 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.31 9.886 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 9.930 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.38 9.974 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 10.018 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.28 10.062 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 10.107 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 10.151 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.195 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 10.239 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.283 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.328 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.372 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.416 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.460 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.505 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.549 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.593 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.637 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.681 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.726 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.770 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.814 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 10.858 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.902 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.947 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.991 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.035 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.079 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.123 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.168 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.212 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.256 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.300 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.345 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 10:43 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 11.389 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.433 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.477 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.521 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.566 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.610 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.654 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.698 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.742 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.787 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.831 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.875 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.001 0.290 9.94 0.39 314.33 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.620 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 9.665 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 9.709 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 9.753 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 9.797 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 9.841 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.31 9.886 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 9.930 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.38 9.974 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.35 0.35 10.018 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.32 0.31 0.29 0.28 10.062 0.26 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 10.107 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 10.151 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.195 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 10.239 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.283 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.328 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 10.372 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.416 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 10.460 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.505 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 10.549 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.593 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.637 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.681 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.726 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.770 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 10.814 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 10:43 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:06 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 1F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00125 83. .1 STREAM REACH: KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.858 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.902 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.947 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 10.991 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.035 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.079 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.123 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.168 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.212 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.256 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.300 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.345 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 11.389 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.433 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.477 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.521 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.566 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.610 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.654 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.698 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.742 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.787 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.831 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 11.875 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 10:47:06 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 1F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00125 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 10:43 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA-AREA 1 0.001 0.39 OUTLET 0.001 0.39 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 10:47:06 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 1F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00125 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 10:47:07 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 1F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00125 83. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 4 09/18/2020 10:43 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 10:47:07 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: 1F Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: AREA 1F POST Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA 1F-POST.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA-AREA 1 Outlet 0.8 83 0.1 Total area: .80 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA-AREA 1 0.39 REACHES OUTLET 0.39 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA-AREA 1 0.39 9.94 REACHES OUTLET 0.39 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1 .80 0.100 83 Outlet Total Area: .80 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1 SHEET 100 0.0200 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 125 0.0200 0.025 0.012 Time of Concentration 0.1 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM 1F KINDRED CHURCH AREA 1F POST Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) A .2 39 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways A .6 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number .8 83 == == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 10:47:44 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE SUB-AREA: DMA-AREA 1Outlet .00203 39. .226 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) DMA-AREA 1 0.002 0.0 24.00 0.0 0.0 OUTLET 0.002 0.0 24.00 0.0 0.0 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/19/2020 14:46 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) DMA-AREA 1 0.002 0.0 OUTLET 0.002 0.0 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/19/2020 14:46 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:47:13 PM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL ENG Date: 9/19/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: AREA 2F PRE Areal Units: Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: E:\Users\dave\AppData\Roaming\WinTR-55\19-155-AREA 2F-PRE.w55 --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DMA-AREA 1 Outlet 1.3 39 .226 Total area: 1.30 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr -Yr (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA-AREA 1 .00 REACHES OUTLET .00 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (cfs) (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS DMA-AREA 1 .00 n/a REACHES OUTLET .00 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Summary Table Sub-Area Drainage Time of Curve Receiving Sub-Area Identifier Area Concentration Number Reach Description (ac) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1 1.30 0.226 39 Outlet Total Area: 1.30 (ac) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Sub-Area Flow Mannings's End Wetted Travel Identifier/ Length Slope n Area Perimeter Velocity Time (ft) (ft/ft) (sq ft) (ft) (ft/sec) (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1 SHEET 100 0.0200 0.150 0.204 SHALLOW 200 0.0250 0.050 0.022 Time of Concentration .226 ======== WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM ANACAL ENG KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F PRE Orange County, California Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub-Area Hydrologic Sub-Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DMA-AREA 1Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) A 1.3 39 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 1.3 39 === == WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/19/2020 2:45:08 PM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: STORM ANALYSIS: 2-Yr 2.05 Type I 2 STRUCTURE RATING: GLOBAL OUTPUT: 2 0.05 YYYYN YYYYNN WinTR-20 Printed Page File End of Input Data List KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Name of printed page file: TR20.out STORM 2-Yr Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) 2F 0.001 1.078 9.92 0.99 855.15 Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 8.143 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 8.187 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 8.231 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.275 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.319 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.364 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.408 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.541 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.585 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.629 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.673 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.717 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.762 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.806 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.850 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.894 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.938 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 8.983 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.027 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.071 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 9.115 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 9.159 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 9.204 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.248 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.292 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 9.336 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 9.381 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 9.425 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 9.469 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 9.513 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 9.557 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 9.602 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 9.646 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 9.690 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 9.734 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 9.778 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 9.823 0.57 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.68 0.72 0.76 9.867 0.79 0.83 0.86 0.89 0.92 0.94 0.96 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 1 09/18/2020 11:23 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 9.911 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.96 9.955 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.84 0.83 9.999 0.82 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.71 10.044 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.45 10.088 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.31 10.132 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.26 10.176 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.23 10.221 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.265 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 10.309 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 10.353 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 10.397 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 10.442 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 10.486 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 10.530 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.574 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.618 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.663 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.707 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.751 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.795 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.839 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 10.884 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.928 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.972 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.016 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.061 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.105 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.149 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.193 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.237 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.282 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.326 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 11.370 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.414 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.458 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.503 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.547 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.591 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.635 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.679 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.724 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.768 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.812 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.856 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.901 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.945 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.989 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.033 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.077 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.122 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 2 09/18/2020 11:23 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 12.166 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.210 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.254 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.298 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.343 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.387 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.431 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.475 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.519 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.564 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.608 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.652 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.696 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.741 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.785 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.829 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.873 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.917 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.962 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.006 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.050 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.094 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.138 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.183 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.227 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.271 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.315 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.359 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.404 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.448 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 2 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: 13.492 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.536 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.581 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.625 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.669 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.713 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.757 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.802 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.846 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.890 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.934 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.978 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 14.023 0.05 0.05 Area or Drainage Rain Gage Runoff ------------ Peak Flow ------------ Reach Area ID or Amount Elevation Time Rate Rate Identifier (sq mi) Location (in) (ft) (hr) (cfs) (csm) OUTLET 0.001 1.078 9.92 0.99 855.15 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 3 09/18/2020 11:23 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 8.143 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 8.187 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 8.231 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.275 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.319 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.364 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 8.408 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 3 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: 8.452 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.496 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.541 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 8.585 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.629 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.673 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.717 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 8.762 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.806 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.850 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.894 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 8.938 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 8.983 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.027 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 9.071 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 9.115 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 9.159 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 9.204 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.248 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 9.292 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 9.336 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 9.381 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 9.425 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 9.469 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 9.513 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.17 9.557 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.20 9.602 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 9.646 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.30 9.690 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 9.734 0.37 0.38 0.40 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.47 9.778 0.49 0.50 0.51 0.53 0.54 0.55 0.56 9.823 0.57 0.59 0.62 0.65 0.68 0.72 0.76 9.867 0.79 0.83 0.86 0.89 0.92 0.94 0.96 9.911 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.96 9.955 0.94 0.92 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.84 0.83 9.999 0.82 0.80 0.79 0.78 0.76 0.74 0.71 10.044 0.68 0.64 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.45 10.088 0.42 0.39 0.37 0.35 0.34 0.32 0.31 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 4 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: 10.132 0.30 0.29 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.26 10.176 0.25 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.23 10.221 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22 10.265 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.20 10.309 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.19 10.353 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.18 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 4 09/18/2020 11:23 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 10.397 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.17 10.442 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 10.486 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 10.530 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 10.574 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.618 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.663 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 10.707 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.751 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.795 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 10.839 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 10.884 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.928 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.972 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 11.016 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.061 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.105 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.149 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.193 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.237 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.282 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 11.326 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 5 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: 11.370 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.414 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.458 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.503 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.547 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.591 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.635 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.679 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.724 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 11.768 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.812 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.856 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.901 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.945 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 11.989 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.033 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.077 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.122 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.166 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.210 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.254 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 12.298 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.343 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.387 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.431 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.475 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.519 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.564 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.608 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 5 09/18/2020 11:23 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Line Start Time ------------ Flow Values @ time increment of 0.006 hr ------------ (hr) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 6 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: 12.652 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.696 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.741 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.785 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.829 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.873 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.917 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 12.962 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 13.006 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.050 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.094 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.138 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.183 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.227 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.271 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.315 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.359 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.404 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.448 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.492 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.536 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.581 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.625 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 13.669 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.713 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.757 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.802 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.846 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.890 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.934 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 13.978 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 14.023 0.05 0.05 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 7 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 6 09/18/2020 11:23 KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Area or Drainage ----------- Peak Flow by Storm ----------- Reach Area Alternate 2-Yr Identifier (sq mi) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 2F 0.001 0.99 OUTLET 0.001 0.99 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 8 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 9 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-20 Printed Page File Beginning of Input Data List TR20.inp WinTR-20: Version 1.10 0 0 0.05 ED CHURCH (continued) AREA 2F POST STORM 2-Yr SUB-AREA: 2F Outlet .00116 97. .1 STREAM REACH: WinTR-20 Version 1.10 Page 7 09/18/2020 11:23 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 10 9/18/2020 11:26:41 AM WinTR-55 Current Data Description --- Identification Data --- User: ANACAL Date: 9/18/2020 Project: KINDRED CHURCH Units: English SubTitle: AREA 2F POST Areal Units: &Acres State: California County: Orange Filename: <new file> --- Sub-Area Data --- Name Description Reach Area(ac) RCN Tc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2F PARKING LOT Outlet 0.74 97 0.1 Total area: .74 (ac) --- Storm Data -- Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 11:27:05 AM ANACAL KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Orange County, California Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 5-Yr 10-Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1-Yr -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.05 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 Storm Data Source: User-provided custom storm data Rainfall Distribution Type: Type I Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: <standard> WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 11:27:05 AM ANACAL KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Orange County, California Watershed Peak Table Sub-Area Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS 2F 0.99 REACHES OUTLET 0.99 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 11:27:05 AM ANACAL KINDRED CHURCH AREA 2F POST Orange County, California Hydrograph Peak/Peak Time Table Sub-Area Peak Flow and Peak Time (hr) by Rainfall Return Period or Reach 2-Yr Identifier (hr) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBAREAS 2F 0.99 9.92 REACHES OUTLET 0.99 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.10 Page 1 9/18/2020 11:27:05 AM EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP L=470'S=0.10443.0FL395.8FLL=415'S=0.100451.0FLL=410'451.0FLEX 60"PUBLIC S.D.L=45'S=0.1012" EX. SDEX. 24"SD18"SDEX 12"SDPROP. 8" SDPROP. CURB DRAINPROP. 8" SDPROP. J.S. DIVERTQBMP TO INFILTRATIONPT BOVERFLOW446.1TG467.0FL447.1TG-GI24"SDL=330'S=0.059L=370'S=0.015PRIVATE DRAIN433.40FL418.0INVL=270'S=0.02451.0FLCivil Engineering and Land SurveyingE N G I N E E R I N GA N A C A LAnaheim PROPOSED HYDROLOGY MAP L=470'S=0.10443.0FL395.8FLL=230'S=0.173L=213'S=0.070467.0FL452.0FL433.40FL418.0INVL=270'S=0.02L=415'S=0.100L=340'S=0.015446.60TG-PT A451.0FLL=410'451.2FL446.50TGL=225'S=0.02506.0FL446.0FL451.0FLEX 60"PUBLIC S.D.POINT X-1S=0.1012" EX. SDEX. 24"SD18"SDEX 12"SDPROP. 8" SDPROP. CURB DRAINPROP. 8" SDPROP. J.S. DIVERTQBMP TO INFILTRATIONPT BOVERFLOWCivil Engineering and Land SurveyingE N G I N E E R I N GA N A C A LAnaheim _______________________________________ Attachment C _______________________________________ Kindred Community Church Operations and Maintenance Plan Site: 8712‐8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. APN: 354‐321‐01 & 354‐321‐03 Exhibit A, Operations and Maintenance Plan BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Inspection / Maintenance Activities Required Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Y N1. Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants Once yearly and for new employees Provide literature and instruction pertaining to environmental awareness included in Section VII, Educational Material to all Leassies. Owner Y N2. Activity Restriction Continuous Activities to be restricted on-site include: Prohibit discharges of fertilizers, pesticides, or animal wastes to streets or storm drains. Prohibit blowing or sweeping of debris (leaf litter, grass clippings, litter, etc.) into streets and storm drains. Prohibit vehicle maintenance or repair within common area or such that pollutants can enter streets or storm drains. Report any violations relating to activity restrictions listed herein. Owner Y N3. Common Area Landscape Management Bi-weekly Sweep silt and debris. Replace dead vegetation, maintain irrigation in proper working order Y N4. BMP Maintenance As indicated in WQMP Provide maintenance as instructed in all sections of this plan. Owner N N5. Title 22 CCR Compliance N N7. Spill Contingency Plan Exhibit A, Operations and Maintenance Plan Page 2 of 12 BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Inspection / Maintenance Activities Required Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility N N8. Underground Storage Tank Compliance N N9. Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance N N10. Uniform Fire Code Implementation Y N11. Common Area Litter Control Bi-weekly Keep grounds free of trash and debris Owner Y N12. Employee Training Upon hire Provide all employees with literature consistent with their activities Owner N N13. Housekeeping of Loading Docks Y N14. Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Once prior to rainy season October 15-April 15 Inspect catch basin storm drains and infiltration system clean and maintain in accordance with manufacturers recommendations Y N15. Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Once prior to rainy season October 15-April 15 Sweep parking and drive areas. No hosing down of areas is allowed. Dispose of debris offsite. Owner N N17. Retail Gasoline Outlets Structural Source Control BMPs Y Provide Storm Drain System Stenciling and Signage Once Yearly .Repaint when fades 50% Owner Exhibit A, Operations and Maintenance Plan Page 3 of 12 BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Inspection / Maintenance Activities Required Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility N Design and Construct Outdoor Material Storage Areas to Reduce Pollutant Introduction Y Design and Construct Trash and Waste Storage Areas to Reduce Pollutant Introduction Bi-weekly Keep lids closed at all times. Provide signage that prohibits dumping of toxic materials. Clean spills with minimal water and wipe clean Y Use Efficient Irrigation Systems & Landscape Design Inspect monthly Test for overspray, adjust , maintain and fix irrigation Owner N Protect Slopes and Channels and Provide Energy Dissipation N Loading Docks N Maintenance Bays N Vehicle Wash Areas N Outdoor Processing Areas N Equipment Wash Areas N Fueling Areas N Hillside Landscaping N Wash Water Controls for Food Preparation Areas Exhibit A, Operations and Maintenance Plan Page 4 of 12 BMP Applicable? Yes/No BMP Name and BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Procedures Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Frequency and Schedule Inspection / Maintenance Activities Required Person or Entity with Operation & Maintenance Responsibility N Community Car Wash Racks Low Impact Development (LID) and Treatment Control BMPs Y Infiltration Control BMP # 1 Infiltration in Underground Chambers By Contech After each significant storm event for the first year. At a minimum of once per year prior to rainy season Oct. 15 thereafter. Verify Chambers do Infiltrate within 48 hours after storm event. Remove trash and Inspect drain inlets and remove debris . If standing water persists flush system and replace gravel media if required. Owner Y Pre-Treatment control BMP #2 Filterra Bioretention System By Contech Inspections performed once or twice per year (spring and fall). Depending on the schedule made after first year of activation. Activation and first year maintenance is included. After the first year of maintenance, maintenance responsibly falls on the owner. This included inspecting the surrounding area and removing any trash or debris. Add mulch to a depth of 3”. Replace Filterra grates if applicable. See manufactures recommendations on Owners Manuel for more details in Section VII of the WQMP. Owner RECORD OF BMP IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, AND INSPECTION Today’s Date: Name of Person Performing Activity (Printed): Signature: BMP Name (As Shown in O&M Plan) Brief Description of Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection Activity Performed _______________________________________ Attachment D _______________________________________ Kindred Community Church Soil Report Site: 8712‐8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. APN: 354‐321‐01 & 354‐321‐03 August 10, 2016 Project No. 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 100 South Chaparral Court Anaheim, CA 92808 Attention: Mr. Mark Vaughan Subject: Percolation Testing, Lower Parking Area, Kindred Church, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California. References: Giles Engineering Associates, Inc., 2014, Geotechnical Feasibility Study, Proposed Site Development, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim Hills, California, dated March 18, 2014. Anacal Engineering, Topographic Survey. Mark, In accordance with your request and authorization, TGR Geotechnical, Inc. (TGR) has completed percolation testing at the subject site. The work was performed in accordance with our proposal dated August 8, 2016 and your subsequent authorization to proceed. During our field investigation, it was observed that the subsurface soils consist of brown, moist, silty fine sand to the depth explored. Presented below are the details of our investigation. Scope of Work The scope of work for this percolation testing included the following: Excavation of one (1) exploratory hand auger boring to an approximate depth of 5 feet below existing grade to evaluate the existing soil conditions at the subject site. Evaluation of infiltration rate by performing percolation testing within the boring. Preparation of this report summarizing our findings, conclusions, and recommendations. Field Investigation Field exploration was performed on August 10, 2016 by representatives from our firm who logged the boring and obtained representative samples, which were subsequently transported to the laboratory for further review and testing. The approximate location of the boring is indicated on the enclosed Boring Location Map (Plate 1). 15-5382 Page 2 The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling, sampling, and logging one (1) hand auger boring. The boring was advanced to approximately 5 feet below existing grade. Percolation testing took place within the boring. Subsequent to drilling, the boring was backfilled with cuttings. Groundwater No groundwater was encountered in our boring to a maximum depth of 5 feet below existing grade. Based on our review of available historical groundwater information (CDMG, 1998) regional groundwater is mapped approximately 20 feet below ground surface in the general site area. During a previous investigation (Giles Engineering Associates, 2014), groundwater was encountered in the general area at a depth of 18.5 feet below existing grade. Seasonal and long-term fluctuations in the groundwater may occur as a result of variations in subsurface conditions, rainfall, run-off conditions and other factors. Therefore, variations from these observations may occur. Percolation Testing Percolation testing was performed at the subject site. Presented below are the infiltration rates from the percolation tests performed at the subject site. These do not include any factor of safety. P-1 at 0-5 feet 2.8 inches per hour The infiltration test rates were determined utilizing the Orange County Technical Guidance Document (2011). If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, TGR GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Sanjay Govil, PhD, PE, GE 2382 Principal Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Plate 1 – Boring Location Map Distribution: (1) Addressee BORING LOCATION MAP KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH 8720 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA PLATE 1 PROJECT NO. 15-5382 P-1 P-1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PERCOLATION TEST November 10, 2020 Project No. 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 100 South Chaparral Court Anaheim, CA 92808 Subject: Percolation Testing Results for WQMP, Pavement Design and Building Expansion Foundation Recommendations, Kindred Church, 8720 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, California. In accordance with your request and authorization, TGR Geotechnical, Inc. (TGR) has completed a geotechnical investigation to provide infiltration rates from percolation testing, asphalt concrete pavement design and Fellowship Hall main church building expansion foundation recommendations at the subject site. It is our understanding that the proposed improvements consist of the expansion of the central and southern parking lots, installation of three infiltration basins and the expansion of the main church building. Based on our investigation the proposed improvements are feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations presented in this report are implemented during design and construction. SCOPE OF SERVICES Our scope of work included performing the following tasks: Site reconnaissance. Review of previous geotechnical reports for the subject site. Percolation testing in three (3) locations to a depth of approximately 10.5 feet below existing grade. Percolation testing followed the Orange County Technical Guidance Document, Appendix VII. The borings were be backfilled with soil cuttings and soil was disposed on- site. Sampling and logging two (2) hollow stem auger borings to a depth of approximately 5.5 feet below existing grade. The borings were backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion. Any excess soil was disposed onsite. Laboratory testing of selected samples to include: in situ moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, shear, passing No. 200 sieve and R-Value. Preparation of this report presenting the results of percolation testing, infiltration rate from the percolation testing, pavement design recommendations for the proposed parking lot and geotechnical design recommendations for the proposed church building expansion. 15-5382 Page 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION Field exploration was performed on October 13, 2020 by representatives from our firm who logged the borings and obtained representative samples, which were subsequently transported to the laboratory for further review and testing. The approximate locations of the borings are indicated on the enclosed Geotechnical Map (Plate 1). The subsurface conditions were explored by drilling, sampling, and logging two (2) borings with a truck mounted hollow stem drill rig to an approximate depth of five and one-half (5.5) feet below existing grade and three (3) borings to ten and one-half (10.5) feet below existing grade for percolation testing. Subsequent to drilling, all borings were backfilled with soil cuttings and the surface was repaired with cold patch asphalt, where appropriate. The logs of borings presenting soil conditions and descriptions are provided as Plates 2 through 6. The drill rig was equipped with a sampling apparatus to allow for recovery of driven modified California Ring Sampler (CRS), 3-inch outside diameter, and 2.42-inch inside diameter samples. Driven samples and bulk samples of the earth materials encountered at selected intervals were recovered from the borings. The samples were driven using an automatic 140-pound hammer falling freely from a height of 30 inches. The blow counts for CRS were converted to equivalent SPT blow counts. Soil descriptions were entered on the logs in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The locations and depths of the soil samples recovered are indicated on the logs on Plates 2 through 6. PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation testing was performed at the subject site utilizing the Porchet Method. Presented below are the infiltration rates from the percolation tests performed at the subject site. These do not include any factor of safety. P-1 at 0-10.5 feet 0.10 inches per hour P-2 at 0-10.5 feet 0.20 inches per hour P-3 at 0-10.5 feet 0.15 inches per hour The infiltration test rates were determined in general accordance with Orange County Public Works Technical Guidance Document (2011). LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed on representative samples to verify the field classification of the recovered samples and to evaluate the geotechnical properties of the subsurface soils. The following tests were performed: In-situ moisture content (ASTM D2216) and dry density (ASTM D7263); Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D1557); Direct Shear Strength (ASTM D3080); Expansion Potential (ASTM D4829); Passing No. 200 sieve (ASTM 1140); R-Value Determination (CAL 301); and Soluble Sulfate (CAL.417A). 15-5382 Page 3 Moisture and Density Determination Tests: Moisture content and dry density determinations were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained from the test borings. The results of these tests are presented in the boring logs. Where applicable, only moisture content was determined from "undisturbed" or disturbed samples. Maximum Density Tests: The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of typical materials were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557. The results of these tests are presented on Plate 7 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Maximum Dry Density (Pcf) Optimum Moisture Content (%) P-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 113.0 16.0 Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear test was performed on selected remolded and/or undisturbed sample, which was soaked for a minimum of 24 hours under a surcharge equal to the applied normal force during testing. After transfer of the sample to the shear box, and reloading the sample, pore pressures set up in the sample due to the transfer were allowed to dissipate fo r a period of approximately 1-hour prior to application of shearing force. The sample was tested under various normal loads, a motor-driven, strain-controlled, direct-shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of less than 0.001 to 0.5 inches per minute (depending upon the soil type). The test results are presented on Plate 8 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Friction Angle (degrees) Apparent Cohesion (psf) P-2 @ 0-5 feet Remolded Shear – Clayey Sand 26 462 Expansion Index Tests: The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, ASTM D4829. Specimens are molded under a given compactive energy to approximately the optimum moisture content and approximately 50 percent saturation or approximately 90 percent relative compaction. The prepared 1-inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimens are loaded to an equivalent 144 psf surcharge and are inundated with tap water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The results of these tests are presented in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Expansion Index Expansion Potential P-1 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 64 Medium Wash Sieve Test: Typical materials were washed over No. 200 sieve (ASTM Test Method D1140). The test results are presented below: Sample Location % Passing No. 200 Sieve P-1 @ 4 feet 45.5% P-1 @ 9 feet 46.1% 15-5382 Page 4 P-2 @ 4 feet 53.0% P-2 @ 9 feet 59.0% P-3 @ 4 feet 33.9% P-3 @ 9 feet 43.5% R-Value: The resistance “R”-Value was determined by the California Materials Method No. 301 for sub-grade soils. For the representative sample exudation pressure and “R”-Value was determined. The graphically determined “R”-Value at exudation pressure of 300 psi is summarized on Plates 9 and 10 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample description R-Value P-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 12 Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate content of selected sample was determined by standard geochemical methods. The test results are presented on Plate 11 and in the table below: Sample Location Sample Description Water Soluble Sulfate in Soil, (% by Weight) Sulfate Content (ppm) Exposure Class* B-2 @ 0-5 feet Clayey Sand 0.0173 173 S0 * Based on the current version of ACI 318-14 Building Code, Table No. 19.3.1.1; Exposure Categories and Classes. EXISTING SITE CONDITION The subject site consists of a Fellowship Hall church building and Workshop Center in the southeast portion of the property, a parking lot, nature walk and lake in the central portion of the property and Educational portable buildings in the southwest portion of the property. The Fellowship Hall and Workshop Center were constructed on compacted artificial fill overlaying bedrock, designated as structural areas, while the remaining portions of the site are underlain by compacted artificial fill overlaying landslide debris and/or debris fill. Total removals of landslide material were made in the area of the above-mentioned structural pad in order to provide a buttress for the ascending slope to the south of the site. The approximate depth of the landslide debris in this area appears to have been in the 60 to 100 feet range. The limits of the buttress fill key extend to the north of the structural pad area approximately 60 to 100 feet. It appears that the northern limits of the structural pad are based on a 1:1 (horizontal: vertical) projection from the base of the landslide debris removals/toe of the fill key to the surface. The limits of the landslide debris removals and structural pad are presented on Plate 1. The thickness of the remaining landslide debris to the north of the structural pad area is unknown since the mass grading plan review report for the site and surrounding areas was not available for review. However, based on the estimated depth of the removals of landslide debris 15-5382 Page 5 in the structural pad area we anticipate the thickness of the remaining landslide debris to the north to be similar in depth, ranging from 60 to 100 feet. The thickness of the landslide debris on the west side of the site is also unknown since the mass grading plan review report for the site and surrounding areas was not available for review. However, based on our review of the CDMG report, the landslides on the west side of the site are similar in size to the landslides on the south side of the side. As such, we would anticipate that the thickness of the landslide debris on the west side of the site to be similar to that of the landslide debris on the south side. The existing Fellowship Hall main church building was constructed in the structural fill area with foundations supported on two to three feet of remedially compacted engineered fill within the structural fill. FINDINGS Regional Geologic Setting The subject site is located in the Anaheim Hills region, south of the Santa Ana River, within the northwestern portion of the Black Star Canyon 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County, California. Per the geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30’ x 60’ Quadrangles (Morton, 2006) the subject site is underlain by Quaternary alluvial deposits and possible mid- Miocene marine strata toward southern portions of the site (Figure 2). Existing Soil Based on our subsurface investigation, the subject site subsurface soils generally consist of tan to brown clayey sand and sandy clay in a moist condition to the maximum depth explored, 10.5 feet below existing grade. In the existing parking lot, in the vicinity of Borings B-1 and B-2, the clayey sand and sandy clay is underlain by blue grey and olive brown silty sand in a moist condition at a depth of 4 feet to 5.5 feet below existing grade. Detailed descriptions of the earth units encountered in our borings are presented in the log of the borings on Plates 2 through 6. Groundwater Subsurface water was not encountered during the exploration to a maximum depth of 10.5 feet below existing ground surface. Based on our review of available historical groundwater information for the Black Star Canyon 7.5-minute Quadrangle (CDMG, 2000) regional groundwater has been mapped in the general site area between approximately 20 to 40 feet below ground surface (Figure 3). Seasonal and long-term fluctuations in the groundwater may occur as a result of variations in subsurface conditions, rainfall, run-off conditions and other factors. Therefore, variations from our observations may occur. Static groundwater is not anticipated to impact the proposed development. Expansive Soil Onsite soils have an expansion index of 64 correlating to a “medium” expansion potential. The recommendations provided in this report account for the expansion potential of the onsite soils. 15-5382 Page 6 RECOMMENDATIONS Seismic Design Parameters When reviewing the 2019 California Building Code the following data should be incorporated into the design. Parameter Value Latitude (degree) 33.8635 Longitude (degree) -117.7224 Site Class D – Stiff Soil Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv N/A Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period, Ss 1.927 g Mapped Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period, S1 0.679 g Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period Adjusted for Site Class, SMS 1.927 g Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period Adjusted for Site Class, SM1 N/A Design Spectral Acceleration at 0.2-sec Period, SDS 1.284 g Design Spectral Acceleration at 1.0-sec Period, SD1 N/A Site Specific Response Spectra The USGS Unified Hazard tool, the USGS RTGM Calculator and the USGS App for Deterministic Spectra Acceleration were utilized to develop site specific ground motion spectra. The analysis was performed utilizing the following attenuation relationships that are part of NGA as required by 2019 CBC code requirements. Campbell & Bozorgnia (2014) Boore, Stewart, Seyhan & Atkinson (2014) Chiou & Youngs (2014) Abrahamson, Silva & Kamal (2014) The results of the Site Specific Response Spectra are incorporated in Tables 1 through 3 and on Figure 1 in Appendix B. The results include deterministic spectra at 5% damping, maximum rotated component at 0.84 fractile and the probabilistic spectra, maximum rotated component at 5% damping for a return period of 2475 year and subsequently multiplied by risk coefficient to obtain the MCER probabilistic spectral acceleration. The Vs30 utilized was 260 m/s. The above generated spectral accelerations were compared against the minimum code requirements in ASCE7-16 (Chapters 11 and 21) resulting in the final design response spectra which is presented in Table 1 and on Figure 1 in Appendix B. 15-5382 Page 7 Based on Tables 1 through 3 and Figure 1, the recommended Site Specific SDS and SD1 are as follows: SDS = 1.256 SD1 = 1.102 The structural consultant should review the above parameters and the 2019 California Building Code to evaluate the seismic design. Conformance to the criteria presented in the above table for seismic design does not constitute any type of guarantee or assurance that significant structural damage or ground failure will not occur during a large earthquake event. The intent of the code is “life safet y” and not to completely prevent damage of the structure, since such design may be economically prohibitive. Pavement Design Based on our field investigation and laboratory testing, presented below are the Asphalt Concrete (AC) pavement design recommendations for the proposed new central parking lot the expansion of the southern parking lot. The pavement section recommendations are based on the tested R-value of 12 for the anticipated pavement subgrade soils and assumed traffic index. The traffic indices shall be approved by the project civil engineer and the reviewing agency. Pavement Utilization Assumed Traffic Index Asphalt Concrete (Inches) Base (Inches) Total Thickness (inches) Parking Stalls 4.5 3.0 8.0 11.0 Drive Aisles 5.0 4.0 7.0 11.0 Aggregate base material for Asphalt Concrete Pavement should consist of CAB/CMB complying with the specifications in Section 200-2.2/200-2.4 of the current “Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction” and should be compacted to at least ninety-five (95) percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). The surface of the aggregate base should exhibit a firm and unyielding condition just prior to the placement of asphalt concrete paving. The pavement subgrade should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM D1557) to a minimum depth of one (1) foot. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The R-value and the associated pavement section should be confirmed at the completion of site grading Church Building Expansion Foundation Design Recommendations The proposed Fellowship Hall expansions are located to the northeast and southwest of the existing structure within the area of structural fill, shown on Plate 1. The proposed main church building expansion may be supported on continuous and/or spread footings. Bearing capacity recommendations for shallow foundations are presented below. These recommendations assume that the footings will be supported on a minimum of one (1) foot of engineered fill. 15-5382 Page 8 For foundations supported on one (1) foot of engineered fill with minimum ninety (90) percent relative compaction an allowable bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot may be used in design. All shallow foundations should extend a minimum of twenty-four (24) inches below the lowest adjacent grade. The minimum recommended footing width is eighteen (18) inches for continuous footing and eighteen (18) inches for pad footing. A minimum reinforcement of two (2) No. 4 steel bar top and two (2) No. 4 steel bar bottom is required for continuous footings from a geotechnical viewpoint. Foundation design details such as concrete strength, reinforcements, etc should be established by the Structural Engineer. A one-third (1/3) increase on the aforementioned bearing pressure may be used in design for short-term wind or seismic loads. The total and differential static and seismic settlement is anticipated to be 1-inch and 0.5-inches over 30 feet or less. Resistance to lateral loads including wind and seismic forces may be provided by frictional resistance between the bottom of concrete and the underlying fill soils and by passive pressure against the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.33 may be used between concrete foundation and underlying soil. The recommended passive pressure of the engineered fill may be taken as an equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (2,500 psf max). Any footing excavation adjacent to existing continuous footings may require slot cutting (A-B-C slots). As an alternative, shoring or underpinning of existing footings is recommended. All foundations excavations shall be approved prior to placement of concrete by the geotechnical consultant. Additional recommendations may be provided if unusual conditions were observed/encountered during excavation Slab-On-Grade Slab-on-grade should be a minimum of 5-inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of No. 4 reinforcing bar on 12-inch centers in two horizontally perpendicular directions. Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The slab should not be structurally connected to the buildings. The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM 1557) to a minimum depth of two (2) feet. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The actual thickness and reinforcement of the slab shall be designed by the structural engineer and should include the anticipated loading condition and the anticipated use of the building. For moisture sensitive flooring, the floor slab should be underlain by minimum 15-mil impermeable polyethylene membrane (Stego Wrap, Moistop Plus, or any equivalent meeting the requirements of ASTM E1745, Class A rating) as a capillary break. Sand/gravel/aggregate base may be placed above and below the impermeable polyethylene membrane at the discretion of the project structural engineer/concrete contractor for proper curing and finish of the concrete slab-on-grade and protection of the membrane and is considered outside the scope of geotechnical engineering. 15-5382 Page 9 Due to the presence of medium expansive soils, more than normal movement of the flatwork is anticipated. This may be limited by placing a thickened edge (minimum 12-inches) and/or 6- inches of base under the flatwork. The slab-on-grade foundation shall comply with section 1808.6.2 of the CBC (2019) and shall be designed in accordance with WRI/CRSI Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundations. As an alternate the slab-on-grade shall be supported on minimum 2 feet of non-expansive soil to reduce the impact of expansive soils. Flatwork Flatwork should be a minimum of 4-inches thick should be reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 reinforcing bar on 18-inch centers in two horizontally perpendicular directions. Reinforcing should be properly supported to ensure placement near the vertical midpoint of the slab. "Hooking" of the reinforcement is not considered an acceptable method of positioning the steel. The subgrade material should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum laboratory dry density (ASTM D1557) to a minimum depth of one (1) foot. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade soils should be moistened to 120 percent optimum moisture content and verified by our field representative. The actual thickness and reinforcement of the slab shall be designed by the structural engineer and should include the anticipated loading condition. Due to the presence of medium expansive soils, more than normal movement of the flatwork is anticipated. This may be limited by placing a thickened edge (minimum 12-inches) and/or 6- inches of base under the flatwork. Cement Type and Corrosion Concrete used should be designed in accordance with the provisions of ACI 318-14, Chapter 19 for Exposure Class S0 with a minimum unconfined compressive strength of 2,500 psi. TGR does not practice corrosion engineering. If needed, a qualified specialist should review the site conditions and evaluate the corrosion potential of the site soil to the proposed improvements and to provide the appropriate corrosion mitigations for the project. Expansion Potential Soils onsite have an expansion index of 64, which correlates to a “medium” expansion potential. The slab-on-grade foundation shall comply with section 1808.6.2 of the CBC (2019) and shall be designed in accordance with WRI/CRSI Design of Slab-on-Ground Foundations. As an alternate the slab-on-grade shall be supported on minimum 2 feet of non-expansive soil to reduce the impact of expansive soils. Site Development Recommendations Earthwork and Demolition Within the proposed development and demolition area, all foundations, slab-on-grade, vaults, utility lines, surface vegetation, trash, demolition debris, asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete should be cleared and removed from the proposed site. Depressions resulting from the removal of objects encountered as mentioned above should be backfilled with properly compacted engineered fill under the testing and observation of the geotechnical consultant of record. 15-5382 Page 10 During earthwork construction, all site preparation and the general procedures of the contractor should be observed, and the fill and base selectively tested by a representative of TGR. If unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed by this office and if warranted, modified and/or additional recommendations will be offered. Grading All grading should conform to the guidelines presented in the California Building Code (2019 edition), except where specifically superseded in the text of this report. Prior to grading, TGR’s representative should be present at the pre-construction meeting to provide grading guidelines, if needed, and review any earthwork. At a minimum, the upper two (2) feet of soil under slab-on-grade, one (1) foot of soil under footings, flatwork and asphalt concrete pavement should be removed and replaced as engineered fill, compacted to minimum 90 percent relative compaction and moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content per ASTM D1557. Site soils could be reused as engineered fill provided the recommendations presented in this report are implemented. Exposed bottoms should be scarified a minimum of 8-inches, moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum 90 percent relative compaction. Subsequently, site fill soils should be re-compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction at 120 percent optimum moisture content. The depth of over-excavation should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant during the actual construction. Any subsurface obstruction buried structural elements, and unsuitable material encountered during grading, should be immediately brought to the attention of the Geotechnical Consultant for proper exposure, removal and processing, as recommended. Fill Placement Prior to any fill placement TGR should observe the exposed surface soils. The site soils may be re-used as engineered fill provided they are free of organic content and particle size greater than 4-inches. Fill shall be moisture-conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent in accordance with ASTM D1557. Any import soils shall be non-expansive and approved by TGR Geotechnical Inc. Compaction Prior to fill placement, the exposed surface should be scarified to a minimum depth of eight (8) inches, fill placed in eight (8) inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned to 120 percent optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Temporary Excavation and Shoring Temporary construction excavations may be anticipated during the proposed development. Site soils may be cut vertically without shoring to a depth of approximately four (4) feet below adjacent surrounding grade. For deeper cuts, the slopes should be properly shored or the entire excavation sloped back to at least 1.5H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical) or flatter. The exposed slope face should be kept moist (but not saturated) during construction to reduce local sloughing. No surcharge loads should be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut from the toe of excavation unless the cut is properly shored. Excavations that extend below an 15-5382 Page 11 imaginary plane inclined at 45 degrees below the edge of any nearby adjacent existing site facilities should be properly shored to maintain foundation support at the adjacent structures. Any excavation adjacent to existing continuous footings may require slot cutting (A-B-C slots). Geotechnical Review of Plans All grading plans and specifications should be reviewed and accepted by the geotechnical consultant before they are finalized to determine if the geotechnical and/or geologic information have been properly implemented. If this firm is not granted the privilege of reviewing the plans and specifications, this firm is not responsible for misinterpretation of the recommendations given in this report. Geotechnical Observation/Testing During Construction Per sections 1705.6 and table 1705.6 of the 2019 California Building Code, periodic special inspection shall be performed to: Verify materials below shallow foundations are adequate to achieve the design bearing capacity; Verify excavations are extended to the proper depth and have reached proper material; Verify classification and test compacted materials; and Prior to placement of compacted fill, inspect subgrade and verify that the site has been prepared properly Per sections 1705.6 and table 1705.6 of the 2019 California Building Code, continuous special inspection shall be performed to: Verify use of proper materials, densities and lift thickness during placement and compaction of compacted fill. The geotechnical consultant should also perform observation and/or testing at the following stages: During any grading and fill placement; During utility trench excavation and backfill; After foundation excavation and prior to placing concrete; During placement of aggregate base and asphalt paving; When any unusual soil conditions are encountered during any construction operation subsequent to issuance of this report. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Kindred Community Church and their design consultants relative to developing the subject site. No portion of this report may be used by other parties or for other purposes. Unauthorized use of or reliance on this report constitutes an agreement to defend and indemnify TGR from and against any liability which may arise as a result of such use or reliance, regardless of any fault, negligence, or strict liability of TGR. 15-5382 Page 12 TGR considered a number of unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this report. This report has not been prepared for use by other parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties. This report was necessarily based in part upon data obtained from a limited number of observances, site visits, soil and/or other samples, tests, analyses, histories of occurrences, spaced subsurface exploration and limited information on historical events and observations. Such information is necessarily incomplete. Variations can be experienced within small distances and under various climatic conditions. Changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, TGR GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Sanjay Govil, PhD, PE, GE 2382 Edward L. Burrows, M.S, PG, CEG 1750 Principal Geotechnical Engineer Principal Engineering Geologist Attachments: Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Regional Geology Map Figure 3 – Historic High Groundwater Map Plate 1 – Geotechnical Map Plates 2 through 6 – Boring Logs Plate 7 – Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content Plate 8 – Direct Shear Test Results Plates 9 and 10 – R-Value Test Results Plate 11 – Analytical Report for Soluble Sulfates Table 1 – Percolation Test Worksheet Appendix A – References Appendix B – Site Seismic Design and De-Aggregated Parameters Distribution: (1) Addressee SITE LOCATION MAP KINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA FIGURE 1 PROJECT NO. 15-5382 SITE Morton, D.M., and Miller, F.K., 2006, Geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' quadrangles, California: U.S. Geol ogical Survey, Open-File Report OF-2006-1217, scale 1:100,000. FIGURE 2 PROJECT NO. 15-5382REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAP KINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA SITE FIGURE 3 PROJECT NO. 15-5382 Modified From: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, 2000, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Black Star Canyon 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California, Report 046. HISTORIC HIGH GROUNDWATER MAP KINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD, ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA SITE Project No. 15-5382 PLATE 1 GEOTECHNICAL MAP KINDRED CHURCH, 8720 E. SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA B-2 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GEOTECHNICAL BORING P-3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PERCOLATION BORING P-3 P-2 P-1 B-1 B-2 APPROXIMATE AREA OF STRUCTURAL FILL (PACIFIC SOILS ENGINEERING, 1997) NON STRUCTURAL FILL NON STRUCTURAL FILL NON STRUCTURAL FILL Qaf Qls Tt Qaf Tt Qls Qaf Qls Qaf Qls Qaf ARTIFICAL FILL LANDSLIDE DEBRIS TOPANGA FORMATION MAP LEGEND APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED FELLOWSHIP HALL EXPANSION This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete geotechnical report. This Boring Log represents conditions observedat the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to berepresentative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Sheet 11 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS RA SG Hollow Stem 140lbs / 30in LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING B - 1 OtherTestsLAB RESULTS Dry Density,(pcf)Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled: Ground Elev: 117 PLATE 2 118 15 14 34 41 of SM Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive Wt & Drop: Surface is 2 inches of asphalt over 12 inches of base. Gravelly Sand- grey brown, moist, medium dense, fine to mediumgrained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel. Sand and Clay- grey brown sand, blue grey clay, moist, dense, fine to coarse grained sand, some gravel and clasts. Silty Sand- blue grey and brown, moist, dense, fine grained sand with trace coarse. Total Depth: 5.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion. SCDepth(ft)5 10 Graphic LogFIELD RESULTS SPT blows/ft(or equivalent N)USCSShelbyTube MoistureContent (%)15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 - 10/13/20 LOG OF BORING 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/21/20Pocket Pen(tsf)Bulk SampleDrive SampleNo recovery Water TableATDModifiedCalifornia StandardSplit Spoon This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete geotechnical report. This Boring Log represents conditions observedat the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to berepresentative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Sheet 11 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS RA SG Hollow Stem 140lbs / 30in LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING B - 2 OtherTestsLAB RESULTS Dry Density,(pcf)Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled: Ground Elev: S04 PLATE 3 SM 113 115 18 14 25 27 of SC Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive Wt & Drop: Surface is 3 inches over 4 inches of base. Clayey Sand- brown, very moist, medium dense, fine grained, some fine to coarse grained gravel. ...Same as above, blue grey clay. Silty Sand- olive brown, moist, medium dense, fine grained, some coarse. Total Depth: 5.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and sealed with cold patch asphalt upon completion.Depth(ft)5 10 Graphic LogFIELD RESULTS SPT blows/ft(or equivalent N)USCSShelbyTube MoistureContent (%)15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 - 10/13/20 LOG OF BORING 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/21/20Water TableATD Pocket Pen(tsf)Bulk SampleDrive SampleStandardSplit Spoon ModifiedCalifornia No recovery PLATE 4 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive Wt & Drop: ofSheet11 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS RA SG Hollow Stem 140lbs / 30in OtherTestsThis Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete geotechnical report. This Boring Log represents conditions observedat the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to berepresentative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times.Dry Density,(pcf)Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled: Ground Elev: -200= 45.5% LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P - 1 SC -200= 46.1% 110 123 18 10 46 53 SC Surface is a planter with 6 inches of mulch and topsoil. Clayey Sand with Gravel- tan, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel. Clayey Sand- tan brown, very moist, dense, some fine grained gravel and clasts, orange oxidation. ...Same as above, very dense, some blue grey sand. Organic Clay- black, moist, hard, some fine grained gravel, pieces of organic material. Total Depth: 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.Depth(ft)LAB RESULTS 5 10 Graphic LogFIELD RESULTS SPT blows/ft(or equivalent N)USCSShelbyTube MoistureContent (%)15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 - 10/13/20 LOG OF BORING 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/21/20Water TableATD Pocket Pen(tsf)Bulk SampleDrive SampleNo recoveryStandardSplit Spoon ModifiedCalifornia LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P - 2 Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive Wt & Drop: ofSheet11 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Total Depth: 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.OtherTestsPLATE 5This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete geotechnical report. This Boring Log represents conditions observedat the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to berepresentative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Max, R-Value, Shear, EIDry Density,(pcf)RA SG Hollow Stem 140lbs / 30in -200= 53.0% -200= 59.0% 110 106 16 18 51 46 CL-ML CLS Surface is a dirt and vegetation area. Clayey Sand- tan, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel and clasts. Clayey Silt and Sand- tan silt, dark grey clay, moist, hard, very fine grained sand, orange oxidation. Clayey Sand- brown, moist, dense, fine grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel. Sandy Clay- tan, very moist, dense, fine grained sand, orange oxidation. Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled: Ground Elev:Graphic Log5 10 Pocket Pen(tsf)USCSDepth(ft)FIELD RESULTS SPT blows/ft(or equivalent N)Water TableATD LAB RESULTS MoistureContent (%)15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 - 10/13/20 LOG OF BORING 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/21/20Bulk SampleShelbyTube StandardSplit Spoon Drive SampleModifiedCalifornia No recovery This Boring Log should be evaluated in conjunction with the complete geotechnical report. This Boring Log represents conditions observedat the specific location and date indicated, it is not warranted to berepresentative of subsurface conditions at other locations and times. Sheet 11 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS RA SG Hollow Stem 140lbs / 30in LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING P - 3 OtherTestsLAB RESULTS Dry Density,(pcf)Project Number: Project Name: Date Drilled: Ground Elev: -200= 33.9% PLATE 6 SC -200= 43.5% 103 116 11 16 22 29 of SC Logged By: Project Engineer: Drill Type: Drive Wt & Drop: Surface is a dirt and vegetation covered area. Clayey Sand- tan, moist, medium dense, fine grained, fine to coarse pieces of caliche. ...Same as above, no caliche. Clayey Sand- light brown sand, blue grey clay, moist, medium dense, fine grained sand, fine to coarse grained gravel and clasts, orange oxidation. Total Depth: 10.5 feet. No groundwater encountered during drilling. No caving observed. Boring utilized for percolation testing. Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.Depth(ft)5 10 Graphic LogFIELD RESULTS SPT blows/ft(or equivalent N)USCSStandardSplit Spoon MoistureContent (%)15-5382 Kindred Community Church, Anaheim 10/13/20 - 10/13/20 LOG OF BORING 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/21/20Water TableATD ShelbyTube Pocket Pen(tsf)Bulk SampleDrive SampleNo recovery ModifiedCalifornia 75 135 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 130 30 125 113.0 MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP TEST RESULTS Test Method DRY DENSITY, pcfWATER CONTENT, % ATTERBERG LIMITS 20 2.80 2.70 2.60 PL 16.0 Source of Material Description of Material 3037 S. Harbor Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92704 Telephone: 714-641-7189 Fax: 714-641-7190 Project Number: 15-5382 Project Name: Kindred Community Church, Anaheim US COMPACTION 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/16/20Curves of 100% Saturation for Specific Gravity Equal to: ASTM D1557 Method A 0 5 10 15 25 P - 2 0-5ft 35 40 45 Clayey Sand PI Optimum Water Content Maximum Dry Density PCF % LL PLATE 7 2,000 NORMAL PRESSURE, psfSHEAR STRENGTH, psf3,5003,0002,500 4,000 2,500 0 500 1,000 500 2,000 1,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 0 1,000 1,500 Clayey Sand - Remolded - 90% RC Classification 3037 S. Harbor Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92704 Telephone: 714-641-7189 Fax: 714-641-7190 Project Number: 15-5382 Project Name: Kindred Community Church, Anaheim US DIRECT SHEAR 15-5382 KINDRED CHURCH ANAHEIM.GPJ TGR GEOTECH.GDT 10/16/20160-5 c P - 2 102 MC% 462 26 Specimen Identification DIRECT SHEAR TEST PLATE 8 PLATE 9 PLATE 10 ANAHEIM TEST LAB, INC. 196 Technology Drive, Unit D Irvine, CA 92618 Phone (949)336-6544 TO: DATE: 10/20/2020 TGR GEOTECHNICAL 3037 S. HARBOR BLVD. P.O. NO: VERBAL SANTA ANA, CA. 92704 LAB NO: C-4184 SPECIFICATION: CTM-417 MATERIAL: Soil Project No.: 15-5382 Project: Kindred Community Church Sample ID: B2 @ 0-5’ ANALYTICAL REPORT SOLUBLE SULFATES per CT. 417 ppm 218 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ________________________________ WES BRIDGER LAB MANAGER PLATE 11 15-5382 Percolation Test Worksheet Table 1 Test Hole Total Depth (in) Initial Depth (in) Final Depth (in) DWater Level (in) Initial Time (min) Final Time (min) D Time (min) Initial Height of Water (in) Final Height of Water (in) Average Height of Water (in) Infiltration Rate (in/hr) P-1 126 3.5 5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 122.5 121 121.75 0.15 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 126 4 5 1 0.0 10.0 10.0 122 121 121.50 0.10 126 3.5 5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 122.5 121 121.75 0.15 126 3 4.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 121.5 122.25 0.14 P-2 126 3 7 4 0.0 10.0 10.0 123 119 121.00 0.39 126 6.5 8.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 119.5 117.5 118.50 0.20 126 5 7.5 2.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 121 118.5 119.75 0.25 126 5.5 7.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120.5 118.5 119.50 0.20 126 5.5 7.5 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120.5 118.5 119.50 0.20 126 6 8 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 120 118 119.00 0.20 P-3 126 4.5 7 2.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 121.5 119 120.25 0.25 126 9 11 2 0.0 10.0 10.0 117 115 116.00 0.20 126 9.5 11 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 116.5 115 115.75 0.15 126 10.5 12 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 115.5 114 114.75 0.15 126 10 11.5 1.5 0.0 10.0 10.0 116 114.5 115.25 0.15 ΔH =Change in height I t Infiltration Rate Δt =Time interval Have Average Head Height over the time interval r = Radius APPENDIX A REFERENCES APPENDIX A References Allwest Geoscience, Inc., 1999, Remedial Grading Report for the Planned Garden Church Development, 8712 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim, Orange County, California, Job No. 98-1342GC-1, dated December 20, 1999. Bell/Knott & Associates, Kindred Community Church, Campus Design Development Giles Engineering Associates, Inc., 2014, Geotechnical Feasibility Study, Proposed Site Development, 8270 East Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim Hills, California, Project No. 2G- 1402006, dated March 18, 2014. California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 90-19, Landslide Hazards in the North Half of the Black Star Canyon Quadrangle, Orange and Riverside Counties, California, dated 1992. Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., 1997a, Mass Grading Report, Garden Church Site, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California, Work Order 101476G4, dated February 28, 1997. __________, 1997b, Project Grading Report, Lots 3 through 25 incl., Tract 15125, Single- Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California, Work Order 101476G4, dated April 11, 1997. __________, 1997c, Project Grading Report, Lots 1 and 2, Tract 15125, Single-Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California, Work Order 101476G4, dated April 28, 1997. __________, 1997d, Project Grading Report, Lots 3 through 26 incl., Tract 15120, Single - Family Residential Development, The Summit, in the City of Anaheim, California, Work Order 101476G4, dated May 6, 1997. Sessions Consulting Engineers, 2015, Aerial Topography Map, Kindred Community Church, 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road, Anaheim California, Project No. 01-227-1, dated May 4, 2015. APPENDIX B SITE SEISMIC DESIGN AND DE-AGGREGATED PARAMETERS Probabilistic Spectral Acceleration (g) Risk Coefficients Probabilistic Spectral Acceleration MCER (g) Deterministic Spectral Acceleration (g) Is Largest Deterministic Spectral Acceleration <1.5*Fa Deterministic MCER Site Specific MCER 2/3 of Site Specific MCER 80% Code Design Site Specific Design Response Spectrum Rotated Maximum Rotated Maximum Rotated Maximum 84th Percentile 0 0.8943 0.911 0.8147 0.9730 0.9730 0.8147 0.5431 0.4111 0.5431 0.1 1.5312 0.911 1.3949 1.4118 1.4118 1.3949 0.9299 0.7611 0.9299 0.2 2.0383 0.911 1.8569 1.8899 1.8899 1.8569 1.2379 1.0277 1.2379 0.3 2.2984 0.911 2.0938 2.3532 2.3532 2.0938 1.3959 1.0277 1.3959 0.5 2.2725 0.911 2.0702 2.6825 2.6825 2.0702 1.3801 1.0277 1.3801 0.75 1.9355 0.911 1.7632 2.5069 2.5069 1.7632 1.1755 1.0277 1.1755 1 1.6770 0.911 1.5277 2.2904 2.2904 1.5277 1.0185 0.9053 1.0185 2 0.9072 0.911 0.8265 1.3387 1.3387 0.8265 0.5510 0.4527 0.5510 3 0.5950 0.911 0.5420 0.8861 0.8861 0.5420 0.3614 0.3018 0.3614 4 0.4234 0.911 0.3857 0.6046 0.6046 0.3857 0.2571 0.2263 0.2571 5 0.3225 0.911 0.2938 0.4415 0.4415 0.2938 0.1959 0.1811 0.1959 Code Sds 1.285 Crs =0.911 Code Ss =1.927 Site Specific SDS =1.256 Code Sd1 1.132 Cr1 =0.911 Code S1 =0.679 Site Specific SD1 =1.102 To 0.18 Code Fa =1 Sms =1.927 Ts 0.88 Code Fv =2.5 Sm1 =1.6975 TL 8 Input TABLE 1 SITE SPECIFIC GROUND MOTION ANALYSIS SA Period (sec) 15-5382 Kindred Community Church No FIGURE 1 Site Specific Design Response Spectra 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5SPECTRAL ACCELERATION (g)PERIOD (SEC) Site Specific Design Response Spectra Probabilistic SA (Rotated Max) MCER Deterministic SA (Rotated Max) MCER Deterministic MCER Site Specific MCER 80% of Design Code Site Specific Design Response Spectrum Period (g) UHGM (g) RTGM (g) Max Dir Scale factor Max Dir RTGM (g) 0 0.842 0.813 1.1 0.894 0.1 1.432 1.392 1.1 1.531 0.2 1.881 1.853 1.1 2.038 0.3 2.136 2.043 1.125 2.298 0.5 2.067 1.934 1.175 2.272 0.75 1.687 1.564 1.2375 1.935 1 1.410 1.290 1.3 1.677 2 0.734 0.672 1.35 0.907 3 0.466 0.425 1.4 0.595 4 0.320 0.292 1.45 0.423 5 0.237 0.215 1.5 0.323 TABLE 2 Probabilistic Response Spectrum ASCE 7-16 Method 2 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Max Direction RTGM (g)Period (sec) Probabilistic Response Spectra per ASCE 7-16 Period (g) Mean Spectra (g) Sigma (g) 84th- Percentile Spectral Acceleration (g) Max Dir Scale factor Max Dir Deterministic SA (g) 0.001 0.538 0.497 0.885 1.1 0.973 0.1 0.754 0.532 1.283 1.1 1.412 0.2 1.044 0.498 1.718 1.1 1.890 0.3 1.242 0.521 2.092 1.125 2.353 0.5 1.271 0.586 2.283 1.175 2.683 0.75 1.074 0.634 2.026 1.2375 2.507 1 0.906 0.666 1.762 1.3 2.290 2 0.491 0.703 0.992 1.35 1.339 3 0.311 0.710 0.633 1.4 0.886 4 0.207 0.701 0.417 1.45 0.605 5 0.146 0.702 0.294 1.5 0.441 TABLE 3 Deterministic Response Spectrum ASCE 7-16 15-5382 Kindred Community Church 0.000 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Max Direction RTGM (g)Period (sec) Deterministic Response Spectra per ASCE 7-16 Hazards by Location Search Information Coordinates:33.8635, -117.7224 Elevation:450 ft Timestamp:2020-11-09T23:39:46.837Z Hazard Type:Seismic Reference Document: ASCE7-16 Risk Category:III Site Class:D Basic Parameters Name Value Description SS 1.927 MCER ground motion (period=0.2s) S1 0.679 MCER ground motion (period=1.0s) SMS 1.927 Site-modified spectral acceleration value SM1 * null Site-modified spectral acceleration value SDS 1.284 Numeric seismic design value at 0.2s SA SD1 * null Numeric seismic design value at 1.0s SA * See Section 11.4.8 Additional Information Name Value Description SDC * null Seismic design category Fa 1 Site amplification factor at 0.2s Fv * null Site amplification factor at 1.0s CRS 0.911 Coefficient of risk (0.2s) CR1 0.911 Coefficient of risk (1.0s) PGA 0.816 MCEG peak ground acceleration FPGA 1.1 Site amplification factor at PGA PGAM 0.897 Site modified peak ground acceleration TL 8 Long-period transition period (s) 450 ft Report a map errorMap data ©2020 SsRT 1.927 Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (0.2s) SsUH 2.115 Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) SsD 2.336 Factored deterministic acceleration value (0.2s) S1RT 0.679 Probabilistic risk-targeted ground motion (1.0s) S1UH 0.745 Factored uniform-hazard spectral acceleration (2% probability of exceedance in 50 years) S1D 0.931 Factored deterministic acceleration value (1.0s) PGAd 0.984 Factored deterministic acceleration value (PGA) * See Section 11.4.8 The results indicated here DO NOT reflect any state or local amendments to the values or any delineation lines made during the building code adoption process. Users should confirm any output obtained from this tool with the local Authority Having Jurisdiction before proceeding with design. Disclaimer Hazard loads are provided by the U.S. Geological Survey Seismic Design Web Services. While the information presented on this website is believed to be correct, ATC and its sponsors and contributors assume no responsibility or liability for its accuracy. The material presented in the report should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability and applicability by engineers or other licensed professionals. ATC does not intend that the use of this information replace the sound judgment of such competent professionals, having experience and knowledge in the field of practice, nor to substitute for the standard of care required of such professionals in interpreting and applying the results of the report provided by this website. Users of the information from this website assume all liability arising from such use. Use of the output of this website does not imply approval by the governing building code bodies responsible for building code approval and interpretation for the building site described by latitude/longitude location in the report. Uni ed Hazard Tool Input U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program Please do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design code reference documents covered by the U.S. Seismic Design Maps web tools (e.g., the International Building Code and the ASCE 7 or 41 Standard). The values returned by the two applications are not identical. Edition Dynamic: Conterminous U.S. 2014 (u… Latitude Decimal degrees 33.8635 Longitude Decimal degrees, negative values for western longitudes -117.7224 Site Class 259 m/s (Site class D) Spectral Period Peak Ground Acceleration Time Horizon Return period in years 2475 Hazard Curve View Raw Data Hazard Curves Time Horizon 2475 years Peak Ground Acceleration 0.10 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.20 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.30 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.50 Second Spectral Acceleration 0.75 Second Spectral Acceleration 1.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 2.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 3.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 4.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 5.00 Second Spectral Acceleration 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 Ground Motion (g) 1e-13 1e-12 1e-11 1e-10 1e-9 1e-8 1e-7 1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 Annual Frequency of ExceedenceUniform Hazard Response Spectrum 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Spectral Period (s) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Ground Motion (g)Spectral Period (s): PGA Ground Motion (g): 0.8425 Component Curves for Peak Ground Acceleration Time Horizon 2475 years System Grid Interface Fault 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 Ground Motion (g) 1e-14 1e-13 1e-12 1e-11 1e-10 1e-9 1e-8 1e-7 1e-6 1e-5 1e-4 1e-3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 Annual Frequency of Exceedence Deaggregation Component Total ε = (-∞ .. -2.5) ε = [-2.5 .. -2) ε = [-2 .. -1.5) ε = [-1.5 .. -1) ε = [-1 .. -0.5) ε = [-0.5 .. 0) ε = [0 .. 0.5) ε = [0.5 .. 1) ε = [1 .. 1.5) ε = [1.5 .. 2) ε = [2 .. 2.5) ε = [2.5 .. +∞) 5 15 25 35 Closest Distance, rRup (km) 45 55 65 7598.587.5M agnitude (M w )76.565.554.5510% Contribution to Hazard1520255 15 25 35 45 Closest Distance, rRup (km) 55 65 75 98.587.576.5M agnitud e (M w )65.554.5 Summary statistics for, Deaggregation: Total Deaggregation targets Return period:2475 yrs Exceedance rate:0.0004040404 yr⁻¹ PGA ground motion:0.84246025 g Recovered targets Return period:2882.8216 yrs Exceedance rate:0.00034688237 yr⁻¹ Totals Binned:100 % Residual:0 % Trace:0.04 % Mean (over all sources) m:6.74 r:7.57 km ε₀:1.43 σ Mode (largest m-r bin) m:6.48 r:8.71 km ε₀:1.71 σ Contribution:16.94 % Mode (largest m-r-ε₀ bin) m:7.72 r:2.48 km ε₀:0.7 σ Contribution:9.86 % Discretization r:min = 0.0, max = 1000.0, Δ = 20.0 km m:min = 4.4, max = 9.4, Δ = 0.2 ε:min = -3.0, max = 3.0, Δ = 0.5 σ Epsilon keys ε0:[-∞ .. -2.5) ε1:[-2.5 .. -2.0) ε2:[-2.0 .. -1.5) ε3:[-1.5 .. -1.0) ε4:[-1.0 .. -0.5) ε5:[-0.5 .. 0.0) ε6:[0.0 .. 0.5) ε7:[0.5 .. 1.0) ε8:[1.0 .. 1.5) ε9:[1.5 .. 2.0) ε10:[2.0 .. 2.5) ε11:[2.5 .. +∞] Deaggregation Contributors Source Set Source Type r m ε0 lon lat az % UC33brAvg_FM31 System 48.44 Whittier alt 1 [2]2.10 7.29 0.91 117.712°W 33.876°N 33.12 16.43 Chino alt 1 [3]6.46 6.58 1.16 117.662°W 33.910°N 46.95 11.72 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) rev [0]12.89 6.51 2.26 117.590°W 33.829°N 107.43 5.24 Chino alt 1 [2]6.64 6.24 1.29 117.669°W 33.917°N 39.73 3.96 Chino alt 1 [1]9.11 6.08 1.86 117.703°W 33.950°N 10.47 2.46 Whittier alt 1 [1]2.49 6.80 1.08 117.702°W 33.874°N 58.72 2.34 Peralta Hills [0]2.92 6.42 1.09 117.740°W 33.848°N 223.82 2.01 UC33brAvg_FM32 System 36.59 Whittier alt 2 [2]2.18 7.49 0.86 117.719°W 33.878°N 9.51 14.00 Chino alt 2 [2]7.57 6.85 1.22 117.658°W 33.908°N 50.26 7.36 Elsinore (Glen Ivy) rev [0]12.89 6.50 2.27 117.590°W 33.829°N 107.43 5.35 Chino alt 2 [1]7.84 6.35 1.40 117.670°W 33.921°N 37.27 2.75 Richfield [0]8.71 6.33 1.88 117.803°W 33.889°N 290.83 1.69 Whittier alt 2 [1]2.18 7.10 0.97 117.719°W 33.878°N 9.51 1.30 UC33brAvg_FM32 (opt)Grid 7.66 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33.904 6.89 5.57 1.79 117.722°W 33.904°N 0.00 1.74 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33.904 6.89 5.57 1.79 117.722°W 33.904°N 0.00 1.74 UC33brAvg_FM31 (opt)Grid 7.32 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33.904 6.93 5.52 1.82 117.722°W 33.904°N 0.00 1.51 PointSourceFinite: -117.722, 33.904 6.93 5.52 1.82 117.722°W 33.904°N 0.00 1.51 _______________________________________ Attachment E _______________________________________ Kindred Community Church Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Form Site: 8712‐8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. APN: 354‐321‐01 & 354‐321‐03 Water Quality Management Plan Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Tracking No. Assigned by the City of Anaheim: Submission of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility constitutes notice to the City of Anaheim that responsibility for the Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”) for the subject property identified below, and implementation of that plan, is being transferred from the Previous Owner (and his/her agent) of the site (or a portion thereof) to the New Owner, as further described below. I. Previous Owner/Previous Responsible Party Information Contact Person: Title II. Information About Site Transferred Name of Project (if applicable) Title of WQMP Applicable to site: Street Address of Site (if applicable) 8712-8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road Planning Area (PA) and/or Tract Number(s) for Site Date WQMP Prepared (and revised if applicable) III. New Owner/New Responsibility Party Information Company/Individual Name Contact Person Street Address Title City State ZIP Phone IV. Information About Site Transferred General Description of Site Transferred to New Owner General Description of Portion of Project/Parcel Subject to WQMP Retained by Owner (if any) Lot/Tract Numbers of Site Transferred to New Owner Remaining Lot/Tract Numbers Subject to WQMP Still Held by Owner (if any) Date of Ownership Transfer Note: When the Previous Owner is transferring a Site that is a portion of a larger project/parcel addressed by the WQMP, as opposed to the entire project/parcel addressed by the WQMP, the General Description of the Site transferred and the remainder of the project/parcel not transferred shall be set forth as maps attached to this notice. These maps shall show those portions of a project/parcel addressed by the WQMP that are transferred to the New Owner (the Transferred Site), those portions retained by the Previous Owner, and those portions previously transferred by Previous Owner. Those portions retained by Previous Owner shall be labeled “Previous Owner,” and those portions previously transferred by Previous Owner shall be labeled as “Previously Transferred.” V. Purpose of Notice of Transfer The purposes of this Notice of Transfer of Responsibility are: 1) to track transfer of responsibility for implementation and amendment of the WQMP when property to which the WQMP is transferred from the Previous Owner to the New Owner, and 2) to facilitate notification to a transferee of property subject to a WQMP that such New Owner is now the Responsible Party of record for the WQMP for those portions of the site that it owns. VI. Certifications A. Previous Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am no longer the owner of the Transferred Site as described in Section II above. I have provided the New Owner with a copy of the WQMP applicable to the Transferred Site that the New Owner is acquiring from the Previous Owner. Printed Name of Previous Owner Representative Title Signature of Previous Owner Representative Date B. New Owner I certify under penalty of law that I am the owner of the Transferred Site, as described in Section II above, that I have been provided a copy of the WQMP, and that I have informed myself and understand the New Owner’s responsibilities related to the WQMP, its implementation, and Best Management Practices associated with it. I understand that by signing this notice, the New Owner is accepting all ongoing responsibilities for implementation and amendment of the WQMP for the Transferred Site, which the New Owner has acquired from the Previous Owner. Printed Name of New Owner Representative Title Signature Date Completed form shall be submitted to City of Anaheim, Engineering Division. OWNER SELF CERTIFICATION STATEMENT As the owner of APN 354-321-01 & 354-321-03 located at 8712-8720 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd., Anaheim, CA for which a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was approved by the City, I hereby certify under penalty of law that all Best Management Practices contained within the approved Project WQMP have been maintained and inspected in accordance with the schedule and frequency outlined in the approved Operation and Maintenance Plan. The maintenance activities and inspections conducted, as listed in the attached table, have been performed by qualified and knowledgeable individuals. To the best of my knowledge, the information submitted is true and accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and citations for violating water quality regulations. Upon transfer of ownership the new owner or HOA shall maintain an operating budget sufficient to fund ongoing BMP maintenance for the proposed BMPs. This amount shall be reflected in the HOA budget and CC&R, an estimated minimum value which the association is expected to fund shall be $1,400/year which shall include the routine maintenance of all common area landscape and BMPs. Signed: ____________________________________ Name: ____________________________________ Title: ____________________________________ Company: __________________________________ Address: __________________________________ Telephone Number: ___________________________ Date: _________________ Completed Statement shall be submitted annually by June 30th to City of Anaheim, Engineering Division. BMP Implementation Tracking Table BMP Activity Activity Completion Dates or Frequency Source Control BMPs (Structural and Nonstructural) Low Impact Development and Treatment Control BMPs Required Permits List any permits required for the implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. Possible examples are: None to state. Forms to Record BMP Implementation, Maintenance, and Inspection The form that will be used to record implementation, maintenance, and inspection of BMPs is attached. Recordingkeeping All records must be maintained for at least five (5) years and must be made available for review upon request, Appendix G Construction Noise Calculations Construction Generated Noise Building Type Industrial, Parking Garage, Religious, Amusement & Retail Distance (ft) Construction Noise at 50 Feet (dBA Leq)50 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use 1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 84 83 Excavation 89 71 Foundation Construction 77 77 Building Construction 84 72 Finishing and Site Cleanup 89 74 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)380 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 66 65 Excavation (Site Preparation)71 53 Foundation Construction 59 59 Building Construction 66 54 Paving 71 56 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)1,040 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use 1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 58 57 Excavation (Site Preparation)63 45 Foundation Construction 51 51 Building Construction 58 46 Paving 63 48 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)240 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 70 69 Excavation (Site Preparation)75 57 Foundation Construction 63 63 Building Construction 70 58 Paving 75 60 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)680 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use 1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 61 60 Excavation (Site Preparation)66 48 Foundation Construction 54 54 Building Construction 61 49 Paving 66 51 Maximum Construction Noise (dBA Leq)700 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use 1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 61 60 Excavation (Site Preparation)66 48 Foundation Construction 54 54 Building Construction 61 49 Paving 66 51 Average Construction Noise (dBA Leq)1,260 Construction Phase All Applicable Equipment in Use 1 Minimum Required Equipment in Use1 Ground Clearing/Demolition 56 55 Excavation (Site Preparation)61 43 Foundation Construction 49 49 Building Construction 56 44 Paving 61 46 Source: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, "Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances," prepared for the USEPA, December 31, 1971. Based on analysis for Office Building, Hotel, Hospital, School, and Public Works. Recreational Vehicle Park North of Project Site Residential Uses South of Project Site Residential Uses West of Project Site Construction Generated Vibration Recreational Vehicle Park North of Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 380 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS 66 73.000 Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.004 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.002 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.000 Jackhammer 0.035 0.001 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.001 Criteria 0.250 1700 Residential Uses South of Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 240 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.007 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.003 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.000 Jackhammer 0.035 0.001 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.003 Criteria 0.250 Residential Uses West of Project Site Closest Distance (feet): 700 Approximate RMS a Approximate RMS Velocity at 25 ft, Velocity Level, Equipment inch/second inch/second Vibratory roller 0.21 0.001 Large bulldozer 0.089 0.001 Small bulldozer 0.003 0.000 Jackhammer 0.035 0.000 Loaded trucks 0.076 0.001 Criteria 0.250 1. Determined based on use of jackhammers or pneumatic hammers that may be used for pavement demolition at a distance of 25 feet Notes: RMS velocity calculated from vibration level (VdB) using the reference of one microinch/second. Source: Based on methodology from the United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2006). Appendix H Trip Generation Memorandum AGA Engineers, Inc. 211 Imperial Highway, Suite 208, Fullerton, CA 92835 (714) 992-4592 Email: aga@agaengineersinc.com February 11, 2021 Steven Camp, AIA Elements Architecture 6B Liberty, #100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 RE: Trip Generation Evaluation for the Kindred Community Church Improvement Project Dear Mr. Camp: AGA Engineers, Inc. (AGA) is pleased to present to you the summary of the trip generation evaluation regarding the proposed improvement project for the Kindred Community Church, located at 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim. This analysis is based on the proposed improvements which involve four additional modular structures and improvements to the main church building. The proposed total additional square footage is 9,813 square feet and the seating capacity will be increased by 180 seats. The project is expected to be completed in Year 2022. The analysis evaluated how many new trips are expected based on the proposed improvements utilizing both the additional square footage and number of new seats. Although the proposed project is providing an increase in building size and parking, the weekday operations will be moved offsite and therefore there will be significantly less weekday church traffic. Attached are the proposed site plans. Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition uses thousands of studies across the nation to determine common trip generation characteristics by land use, assigning both inbound and outbound trips throughout the weekday AM and PM peak hours and Saturday/Sunday peak periods by proportion. Each vehicle accessing the project site would therefore be considered to generate two trips: one inbound trip when arriving and one outbound trip when departing. Using the Manual, the anticipated project trip generation was determined using parameters given by ITE Land Use Code #560, Church. The project’s trip generation was analyzed based on both the proposed additional square footage and number of new seats for both weekday and Sunday peak periods. Although the weekday operations will be moved offsite, the weekday trip generation was still evaluated. The trip generation calculation per square footage showed that there will be an additional three weekday AM peak hour trips, six weekday PM peak hour trips, and 99 Sunday peak hour trips. Tables 1a/1b show the trip generation analyses utilizing the additional square footage. Mr. Steven Camp February 11, 2021 Page 2 of 4 Table 1a – Weekday Project Trip Generation (per 1,000 square feet) In Out Total In Out Total 6.95 0.198 0.132 0.330 0.221 0.270 0.490 100%60%40%100%45%55%100% In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation 9,813 69 2 1 3 3 3 6 69 2 1 3 3 3 6 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed. (2017) New Project Trips Trip rates per 1,000 square feet Percentages Project Trip Generation - Weekday ITE Code 560: Church Additional Square Footage Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Trip Generation Rates1 - Weekday ITE Code 560: Church Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Table 1b – Sunday Project Trip Generation (per 1,000 square feet) In Out Total 27.63 4.80 5.19 9.99 100%48%52%100% In Out Total Trip Generation 9,813 272 48 51 99 272 48 51 99 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed. (2017) New Project Trips Trip rates per 1,000 square feet Percentages Project Trip Generation - Sunday ITE Code 560: Church Additional Square Footage Daily Sunday Peak Period ITE Trip Generation Rates1 - Sunday ITE Code 560: Church Daily Sunday Peak Period Mr. Steven Camp February 11, 2021 Page 3 of 4 The trip generation calculation per seat showed that there will be an additional two weekday AM peak hour trips, six weekday PM peak hour trips, and 98 Sunday peak hour trips. Tables 2a/2b show the trip generation analyses utilizing the additional number of seats. In Out Total In Out Total 0.44 0.005 0.005 0.010 0.012 0.018 0.030 100%50%50%100%40%60%100% In Out Total In Out Total Trip Generation 180 80 1 1 2 3 3 6 80 1 1 2 3 3 6 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed. (2017) ITE Trip Generation Rates1 - Weekday ITE Code 560: Church Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour New Project Trips Trip rates per seat Percentages Project Trip Generation - Weekday ITE Code 560: Church New Seats Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Table 2a – Weekday Project Trip Generation (per seats) Table 2b – Sunday Project Trip Generation (per seat) In Out Total 1.21 0.265 0.275 0.540 100%49%51%100% In Out Total Trip Generation 180 218 48 50 98 218 48 50 98 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Ed. (2017) Trip rates per seat ITE Trip Generation Rates1 - Sunday ITE Code 560: Church Daily Sunday Peak Period New Project Trips Percentages Project Trip Generation - Sunday ITE Code 560: Church New Seats Daily Sunday Peak Period Mr. Steven Camp February 11, 2021 Page 4 of 4 The project’s maximum Sunday peak hour trip generation based on the additional square footage is expected to be 99 trips, which is just less than the City of Anaheim’s threshold of 100 AM or PM peak hour trips. It should be noted that the City’s threshold typically accounts for weekday AM or PM peak hour where traffic conditions are significantly higher along the City’s arterials. This project is expected to actually generate less weekday traffic as the weekday operations will be moved offsite. City of Anaheim engineering staff have already evaluated the estimated trip generation analysis and stated that a traffic study will not be required. Per City staff, if any street improvements are conducted as part of this project and/or the project size will increase, then a traffic study may be required. The email from the City stating that a traffic study is not required is attached. Should you have any questions, please me or at the following email address. Greg@agaengineersinc.com, Respectfully submitted, ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES Greg Wong, P.E. Vice President ATTACHMENTS – Proposed Site Plans and City Email Kindred Community Church - Trip Generation Evalation (2-11-21).docx Appendix I Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Memorandum Vehicle Miles of Travel Screening Assessment Kindred Community Church: Master Plan & Site Renovation November 17, 2020 Eunice Lee City of Anaheim Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division 200 South Anaheim Blvd, Suite 276 Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Vehicle Miles of Travel Screening Assessment CUP4033E (DEV2020-00081) Kindred Community Church: Masterplan & Site Renovation 8712 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd., Anaheim, CA 92808 Dear Ms. Eunice Lee, This letter is in response to the plan check correction dated October 22, 2020, regarding the requirement of a Vehicles Miles of Travel (VMT) Screening Assessment. It is our belief that the proposed project would be sufficiently screened from project-level assessment, per Type 3 (Project Type Screening) as outlined in the City of Anaheim’s TIA Guidelines for CEQA, dated June 2020. The proposed scope of work, for Kindred Community Church, intends to relocate existing structures and consolidate all current ministry activities into a safe, efficiently-planned upper plaza campus. The project does not intend to increase church visitor or employee traffic, but to instead greatly improve the overall visiting and working experience for the existing population the campus serves. As defined in the TIA Guidelines, the project, being a Community and Religious Assembly Use, would have a less than significant transportation impact because of its local-serving nature. We ask that you please review this information and provide an appropriate determination. M. Steven Camp, AIA, Architect of Record PROJECT DIRECTORYPROJECT DATAKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON ROADANAHEIM, CA 92808CONTACT: JASON ERSELIUSEMAIL: jason@kindredchurch.orgELEMENTS ARCHITECTURE6B LIBERTY #100ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656CONTACT: M. STEVEN CAMP, AIATEL: (949) 488-0865 X111EMAIL: stevec@elementsarch.comANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY1211 N. TUSTIN AVENUEANAHEIM, CA 92807CONTACT: GLEN GWATNEY EMAIL: glen@anacalengineering.comTEL: (714) 774-1763 X106ARCHITECTURALLANDSCAPEL1.0 LANDSCAPE PLANL1.1 LANDSCAPE PLANL1.2 LANDSCAPE PLANCLIENTARCHITECT / APPLICANTCIVIL ENGINEERVICINITY MAPKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 E SANTA ANA CANYON ROADANAHEIM, CA 92808PROJECT ADDRESS514-091-25, 514-101-28,354-321-01, 354-321-03ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERSGENERAL PLAN LAND USEOPEN SPACE (OS)ZONING CLASSIFICATIONSYCAMORE CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 88-1)KEY PLANOVERALLA 2-PHASE RENOVATION PROJECT TO CREATE A SAFE AND EFFICIENTLY PLANNED CAMPUS THAT TAKES ADVANTAGE OF THE BEAUTIFUL SITE.PHASE 11.RE-LOCATE (3) EXISTING MODULAR STRUCTURES AND (1) FABRIC STRUCTURE TO A CONSOLIDATED LOCATIONNEAR THE AUDITORIUM BUILDING, IN A CAMPUS SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.2.CREATE AN UPPER PLATEAU CAMPUS, WHICH FEATURES:A.AN EXPANSIVE “FRONT PORCH”TRELLIS THAT ENCOURAGES FELLOWSHIP AT THE FRONT EDGE OF THEPLATEAU LOOKING OUT OVER THE PROPERTY.B.LANDSCAPE FEATURES THAT SOFTEN THE CAMPUS AND DEFINE GATHERING SPACESC.“MINI-PLAZAS”THAT DEFINE THE SEPARATE FUNCTIONAL GATHERING AREAS FOR CHILDREN’S MINISTRY,ADULT MINISTRIES, ETC.D.RE-LOCATED EXISTING MULTI-PURPOSE FABRIC STRUCTURE TO MAKE ROOM FOR THE MAIN PLAZAE.SEMI-ENCLOSED LATTICE STRUCTURES TO SCREEN THE VARIOUS STRUCTURES AND ACT AS UNIFYINGELEMENTS.3. PROVIDE A NEW TEMPORARY PERMEABLE (TURF) PARKING LOT(#3) AT EXISTING LOWER POND AREA4. DEMOLISH PORTIONS OF EXISTING AUDITORIUM BUILDING TOPREPARE FOR PHASE 2 ADDITIONS (-911 SF)PHASE 21.ADD (4) ADDITIONAL MODULAR STRUCTURES TO INCREASE MINISTRY SPACECAPACITY (+5,760 SF)2.REMODEL EXISTING AUDITORIUM BUILDING TO ADD TWO NEW WINGS FOR ADDITIONAL SEATING, PLUS A BACKOF HOUSE ADDITION (+2,793 NET SF)3.FULLY PAVE TURF PARKING LOT #3 ADDED IN PHASE 1, PLUS RE-STRIPE PARKING LOT #44.ENHANCEMENT OF THE STREET ENTRANCE WITH A NEW MONUMENT SIGN (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT)ANDLANDSCAPE FEATURESNOTE: ALL RELOCATED & NEW MODULAR BUILDINGS SHALL BE FIRE-SPRINKLERED AND MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS WHERE APPLICABLE.NORTHNORTHPROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT LOCATIONW EIR C AN YONE SANTA ANA CANYON91 FREEWAY241 FREEWAYS E R R A NO91 FREEWAY241 FREEWAYE SANTA ANA CANYONPROJECT SCOPEOVERLAY ZONEPLANNED COMMUNITY (PC); SCENIC CORRIDOR (SC)DEVELOPMENT AREA88-2DA204; 88-1DA9P10LOT SIZE42.77 ACRESLEGAL DESCRIPTIONREFER TO SHEET A-2CIVIL12345678 TITLE & NOTES SHEET INDEX PLAN SECTIONS DETAILS & NOTES CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN & DETAILS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN & DETAILS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN & DETAILS CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN & DETAIL CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLANLANE GOODKIND & ASSOCIATES658 S SAN MARCOS ROADSANTA BARBARA, CA 93111CONTACT: LANE GOODKINDEMAIL: lane@lanegoodkind.comTEL: (805) 845-5707LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021COVER SHEET & PROJECT INFOA-1SHEET INDEX (CUP)SHEET # SHEET NAMEA-1COVER SHEET & PROJECT INFOA-2OVERALL PROPERTY SITE PLANA-3OVERALL CONCEPT DIAGRAMSA-4EXISTING OVERALL SITE PLANA-5PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN (BOTH PHASES)A-6PROPOSED OVERALL SITE CIRCULATION & PARKING PLANA-7PROPOSED OVERALL CAMPUS PLUMBING ANALYSISA-8ENLARGED DEMOLITION SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZAA-9ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA - PHASE 1A-10ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA - PHASE 2A-11ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT LOWER PARKING LOTS - PHASE 2A-12EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE VIEWSA-13EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE VIEWS (CONT.)A-14ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING PLAN AT UPPER PLAZAA-15EXISTING SITE PHOTOSA-16PROPOSED SITE MATERIALS & FINISHES AT UPPER PLAZAA-17AUDITORIUM DEMOLITION PLANA-18AUDITORIUM RENOVATION PLANA-19AUDITORIUM ROOF PLANA-20AUDITORIUM ELEVATIONSA-21AUDITORIUM MATERIALS & FINISHESA-22TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILSA-23CONCEPTUAL FIRE CIRCULATION PLANAttachment 4 M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021OVERALL PROPERTY SITE PLANA-21" = 160'-0"LEGAL DESCRIPTIONREAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL B: LOT D OF TRACT NO. 15124, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOQ 749, PAGES 9 TO 12 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL C: LOT C OF TRACT NO. 15125, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 748, PAG $ 3 TO 27 INCLUSIVE OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL E: LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 12990, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 632, PAGES 47 AND 48 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING ALL MINERALS, OIL, GAS, PETROLEUM AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN OR UNDER OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCE FROM THE LAND WHICH UNDERLINES A PLANE PARALLEL TO AND FIVE HUNDRED FEET BELOW THE PRESENT SURFACE OF THE LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROSPECTING, FOR THE EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT, PRODUCTION, EXTRACTION, AND TAKING OF SAID MINERALS, OIL, GAS, PETROLEUM AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES FROM THE LAND BY MEANS OF MINES, WELLS, DERRICKS AND/OR OTHER EQUIPMENT FROM SURFACE LOCATIONS ON ADJOINING OR NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OR LYING OUTSIDE OF THE LAND, IT BEING UNDERSTOOD THAT THE OWNER OF SUCH MINERALS, OIL, GAS PETROLEUM AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AS SET FORTH ABOVE SHALL HAVE NO RIGHT TO ENTER UPON THE SURFACE OF THE LAND NOR TO USE ANY OF THE LANDOR ANY PORTION THEREOF ABOVE SAID PLANE PARALLEL TO AND FIVE HUNDRED FEET BELOW THE PRESENT SURFACE OF THE LAND FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER, AS RESERVED BY RICHARD ALLAN WALLACE, TRUSTEE OF THE RICHARD ALLAN WALLACE TRUST DATED APRIL 28, 1966, AND OTHERS IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 22, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-184833 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL F: BEGINNING AT A 6 X 8 REDWOOD POST MARKING THE ANGLE POINT IN THENORTHEAST LINE OF THE THOMAS YORBA ALLOTMENT IN PARTITION OF THERANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, AS INDICATED ON COMPROMISE BOUNDARY LINE, AS SHOWN ON A LICENSED SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 5 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 26°59'15" EAST 394.13 FEET ALONG SAID COMPROMISE BOUNDARY LINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THECENTER LINE OF THE OLD COUNTY ROAD, AS CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OFORANGE BY DEED RECORDED JULY 26, 1918 IN BOOK 325 PAGE 280 OF DEEDS; THENCE SOUTH 57°04'30" WEST 310.00 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE AND EXTENSION THEREOF TO IRON AXLE; THENCE NORTH 19°04'45" WEST 650.22 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY, AS SHOWN ON A DEED RECORDED MAY 29, 1934 IN BOOK 678, PAGE 203 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 83°13' EAST 102.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SAID COMPROMISE BOUNDARY LINE, AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2., PAGE 5 OF RECORDOF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 66°51'15" EAST 210.06 FEET ALONG SAID COMPROMISE BOUNDARY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.EXCEPTING THEREFROM THATPORTION OF SAID LAND AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR FREEWAY PURPOSES ON THE NORTH, BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1950 IN BOOK 212, PAGE 224 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROMTHAT PORTION OF SAID LAND, AS CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED JANUARY 3, 1952 IN BOOK 2270, PAGE 45 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING FROM SAID PARCELS THAT PORTION THEREOF ACQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR STATE HIGHWAY PURPOSES IN ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ACTION NO. 166646 BY JUDGMENT ENTERED JUNE 1, 1970 IN JUDGMENT BOOK NO. 9304, PAGE 753 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.APN: 514-091-25 (AFFECTS: PARCEL B), 514-101-28(AFFECTS: PARCEL C), 354-251-02 (AFFECTS: PARCEL D), 354-321-01 (AFFECTS: PARCEL E) AND 354-321-03 (AFFECTS: PARCEL F)NORTHTOTAL AREAAPN #AREA (ACRES)514-091-25 (PARCEL B) 1.47514-101-28 (PARCEL C)0.57354-321-01 (PARCEL E) 37.12354-321-03 (PARCEL F)3.61TOTAL 42.77 ACRESAPN 354-251-01SIZE: 15.78 ACRES(NOT A PART)APN 354-251-02SIZE: 27.6 ACRES(NOT A PART)APN 354-321-01SIZE: 37.12 ACRESAPN 354-321-03SIZE: 3.61 ACRESAPN 514-101-28SIZE: 0.57 ACRESAPN 514-091-25SIZE: 1.47 ACRESSANTA ANA CANYON ROAD M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021OVERALL CONCEPT DIAGRAMSA-3PHASE 1 -DEMOLITIONPHASE 2RENOVATE SANCTUARY BUILDING; ADD (2) NEW WING ADDITIONS AND(1) BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION ADD (4) NEW MODULAR BUILDINGSFULLY RE-PAVE, STRIPE AND LANDSCAPE LOWER PARKING LOTRELOCATE (3) EXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS AS SHOWNPAVE AND STRIPE REMODELED PARKING AREAADD NEW LOWER PERMEABLE TURF PARKING LOTCREATE NEW UPPER PLAZA, WITH BOTH LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTSADD "FRONT PORCH" PLAZA TO ENCOURAGE FELLOWSHIP AT PROPERTY ENTRY & OVERLOOKADD (2) "MINI-PLAZAS", FOR MORE INTIMIATE MINISTRY FELLOWSHIPDEMOLISH SMALL MODULAR STRUCTUREPHASE 1 -CONSTRUCTIONADD NEW TRASH ENCLOSURERE-STRIPE AND LANDSCAPE LOWER PARKING LOTRELOCATE EXISTING FABRIC STRUCTURE AS SHOWNDEMOLISH WINGS AT EXISTING AUDITORIUM BUILDING, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT NEW ADDITIONSRE-STRIPE MODIFIED PARKING AREA A-81ENLARGED DEMOLITION SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA 91 FREEWAY SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD 251.25'192.09'155.33'EXISTING PROPERTY LINE, TYP.EXISTING RESIDENCE TO REMAIN610.29'212.00'2 0 7 .8 1 '119.64' 6 7 .5 6 ' 3 9 .3 6 ' 5 2 .4 9 ' 26.17' 24.42' 75.65' 29.92' 3 2 .7 7 ' 155.99' 50.26' 1247.95' 961.99'27.42'41.20'11.69'71.45'112.29'114.75'119.29'123.52'29.22'22.60'43.52'102.91'116.79'35.39'42.82'60.32'EXISTING SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENTEXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTEXISTING STORM DRAIN TO REMAINEXISTING STORM DRAIN LINESEXISTING STORM DRAIN EASEMENTTYP. REAR SETBACKEXISTING SLOPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENTEXISTING PUBLIC STREET EASEMENTEXISTING ACCESS EASEMENTAPN 354-251-0137.12 ACRESAPN 354-321-033.61 ACRESAPN 514-091-251.47 ACRESAPN 514-101-280.57 ACRESEXISTING DRIVEWAYS TO REMAIN, TYP.EXISTING (TEMPORARY) NURSERY BUILDING APPROX 13' H; 3,744 SF (NOT IN SCOPE)EXISTING MEDIA BUILDING EXISTING ELECTRICAL ROOM & TRANSFORMERAPPROX 8' H; 1,008 SF (NOT IN SCOPE)EXISTING CHILDREN'S CLASSROOM BUILDINGSAPPROX 10-12' H; 6,142 SF TOTAL 3262 SF1440 SF1440 SFEXISTING RESTROOMSEXISTING STORAGE SHEDPLAYGROUNDEXISTING ADULT CLASSROOM BUILDINGSAPPROX 10' H; 6,324 SF TOTAL2 ,3 5 6 S F 1 ,6 1 2 S F 2,356 SF EXISTING GARAGEEXISTING (TEMPORARY) HIGH SCHOOL BUILDINGEXISTING (TEMPORARY) JUNIOR HIGH BUILDINGAPPROX 10' H; 1,863 SF (NOT IN SCOPE)APPROX 10' H; 1,755 SF (NOT IN SCOPE)3 8 ' - 1 0 "31' - 8"63' - 11"EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATEDEXISTING FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING WELL-WATER TANK(12,000 GALS)EXISTING PONDEXISTING PARKING LOT (140 SPACES)EXISTING BACKFLOW DEVICEEXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 60 SPACES)EXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 138 SPACES)EXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALL FABRIC STRUCTUREAPPROX 22' H; 4,512 SF EXISTING MONUMENT SIGNFUTURE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAYEXISTING WATER MAIN EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997EXISTING GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING LOTEXISTING PAVED OVERFLOW PARKING LOTM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021EXISTING OVERALL SITE PLANA-41" = 80'-0"NORTHNOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTS A-111SITE PLAN AT LOWER PARKING LOTSPROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZAA-91A-101PHASE 1PHASE 2 91 FREEWAY SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD EXISTING RENOVATED AUDITORIUM WITH NEW ADDITIONS NEW TRELLIS STRUCTURENEW & RELOCATED MODULAR STRUCTURES TO CREATE CONSOLIDATED AND SAFE CAMPUSNEW PARKING LOTEXISTING RE-STRIPED & LANDSCAPED PARKING LOTNEW DECORATIVE SCREENEXISTING TRANSFORMERAPN 354-251-0137.12 ACRESAPN 354-321-03APN 354-321-03EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021PROPOSED OVERALL SITE PLAN (BOTH PHASES)A-51" = 80'-0"NORTHAREA TABULATIONSTOTAL AREA644,252 SFPERVIOUS AREAEXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 325,435 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA50.5% -37,846 SFPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 287,589 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA44.6%IMPERVIOUS AREAEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA318,817 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA49.5% +37,846 SFPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA356,663 SFPERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AREA55.4% NORTHPARKING LOT 1PARKING LOT 2PARKING LOT 3PARKING LOT 4PARKING LOT 5(EXISTING PAVED PARKING TO BE RE-STRIPED)(EXISTING PAVED PARKING LOT TO BE RE-STRIPED & LANDSCAPED)(PROPOSED; PERMEABLE IN PHASE 1; FULLY PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 2)(MODIFIED, PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 1)(MODIFIED, PAVED AND STRIPED IN PHASE 1)C A VC A VC A VC AVC A VC A V C A V C A VC A V CAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVE V E V E V E V E V E V EVEVEVEVEVEVPARKING LOT 6(EXISTING TO REMAIN)PARKING LOT 7(EXISTING TO REMAIN)C A VCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAV CAVCAVCAVCAVCAVCAVC A V EVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVC A V EVCIRCULATION LEGENDEXISTING VEHICLE CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELEXISTING PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELPROPOSED VEHICLE CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVELPROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PATH OF TRAVEL0' - 4"18' - 0"1' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"DOUBLE-STRIPING PER CITY OF ANAHEIM ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAIL 470, TYP.(ADJACENT LANDSCAPING, CURB OR CONC. WALK)24' -0" TYP. DRIVE AISLE U.N.O.2' - 0"M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 4 - NOVEMBER 10, 2021PROPOSED OVERALL SITE CIRCULATION & PARKING PLANA-61" = 80'-0"DESCRIPTION: QTY:LOT 1 77LOT 2 65LOT 3 105LOT 4 141LOT 5 43TOTAL PARKING 431ACCESSIBLE STALL 6STANDARD STALL 71TOTAL 77ACCESSIBLE STALL 6STANDARD STALL 59TOTAL 65STANDARD STALL 105STANDARD STALL 141ACCESSIBLE STALL 2STANDARD STALL 4143ACCESSIBLE STALL 14(MIN. 2% OF TOTAL PARKING)ACCESSIBLE VAN STALL 4(1 FOR EVERY 6 ACCESSIBLE STALLS)PROPOSED PARKINGEXISTING PARKINGDESCRIPTION: QTY:LOT 1 141LOT 2 54LOT 4 129LOT 5 83TOTAL PARKING 407TYPICAL PARKING STALL STRIPINGCLEAN AIR VEHICLE STALL 52*(MIN. 12% OF TOTAL PARKING)MIN. 2 ACCESSIBLE -*1 ACCESS.; 1 VAN ACCESS.TOTAL43 376130141EVCS VEHICLE STALL 44*(MIN. 10% OF TOTAL PARKING)MIN. 2 ACCESSIBLE -*1 ACCESS.; 1 VAN ACCESS.EVCS REQUIRED PER CBC TABLE 11B-228.3.2.1: (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE(1) ACCESSIBLE(1) AMBULATORY* SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONSOVERFLOW STALL 64OVERFLOW STALL 79OVERFLOW (LOTS 6&7) 143TOTAL PARKING WITH OVERFLOW 575OVERFLOW (LOTS 6&7) 143TOTAL PARKING WITH OVERFLOW 51943262 (1) VAN ACCESSIBLE EVCS(1) ACCESSIBLE EVCS(1) AMBULATORY EVCS AAFDFDFDWH45567.86'BFD4.8'DN2 4 "4 "4 "6 "12 "2 4 "12 "12 "5 "4 0 "10 "7 2 "12 "6 "12 "6 "6 "10 "12 "6 "5 "10 "4 0 "4 4 "3 6 "WHAAC2C2C C2C276 INSTRUCTOR INSTRUCTOR M4MP1Literature/HandoutsKIDS CLASSROOMS3,886 SFFELLOWSHIPHALLM41,161 SFCLASSROOMM3-4641 SFCLASSROOMMB-1671 SFCLASSROOMM5-2284 SFSTORAGEM6-21,339 SFCLASSROOMM8188 SFSTORAGEM10-2(E)AUDITORIUM016384 SFWING B131087 SFWING A121059 SFSTORAGE14662 SF(E)KITCHEN07534 SFFOYER02721 SF289 SFELECT.M22759 SFMEDIASTORAGEM23118 SFSTOR.MSMAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO RESTROOMS = 206' < 500' MAX1,690 SFCLASSROOMM1-11,667 SFCLASSROOMM2-1178 SFSTORAGEM2-3177 SFGREENROOMM2-2MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO RESTROOMS = 278' < 500' MAXEXISTING DECKINGLowFixtures& WallsFENCEDPLAYGROUNDINFANTSNURSINGSTORAGE955 SFNURSERYMA-11,040 SFCLASSROOMM6-11,339 SFCLASSROOMM71,357 SFCLASSROOMMC-11,357 SFCLASSROOMMD-1MAX TRAVEL DISTANCE TO RESTROOMS = 215' < 500' MAX2,025 SFCLASSROOMM10-1SPEAKER'SGREENROOM19185 SFMUSICIAN'SGREENROOM16189 SFTECHPRODUCTIONSUITE15175 SFI.T.ROOM1751 SFM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021PROPOSED OVERALL CAMPUS PLUMBING ANALYSISA-71" = 40'-0"1PLUMBING ANALYSIS SITE PLANNORTH2738 "A3" OCCUPANTS =1369 WOMEN AND 1369 MENWATER CLOSETS URINALS LAVATORIES WOMENMEN5167710TOTAL REQUIREDWATER CLOSETS URINALS LAVATORIES WOMENMEN10228913TOTAL PROVIDEDTOTAL CAMPUS PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNTMENS RESTROOM1 WATER CLOSET, 1 URINAL, 1 SINKWOMENS RESTROOM4 WATER CLOSET, 2 SINKWOMEN'S RESTROOM5 WATER CLOSET, 3 SINKMEN'S RESTROOM3 WATER CLOSET, 2 URINAL, 3 SINKWOMEN'S RESTROOM4 WATER CLOSET, 3 SINKMEN'S RESTROOM2 WATER CLOSET, 2 SINKWOMEN'S RESTROOM1 WATER CLOSET, 1 SINKMEN'S RESTROOM1 WATER CLOSET, 1 URINAL, 1 SINKWOMEN'S RESTROOM7 WATER CLOSET, 4 SINKMEN'S RESTROOM2 WATER CLOSET, 3 URINAL, 2 SINKUNISEX RESTROOM1 WATER CLOSET, 1 URINAL, 1 SINKUNISEX RESTROOM1 WATER CLOSET, 1 SINK AAAAAAAA2A 2 A 2 A2AA2AA2A2AAAAEEEBEEEAAC45191919BFDWM2'DN3'DN4.8'DNEX. SD LINE EX. SD LINEE X. SD L INE AA AAABBBBBAABBBBBBA 2A 2A BBBBBEXISTING AUDITORIUMEXISTING MODULAR BUILDING TO REMAIN, TYP. U.N.O.EXISTING FABRIC BUILDING TO BE RELOCATEDEXISTING DRIVEWAY TO RESIDENCE BE RE-CONFIGUREDEXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS TO BE RE-LOCATEDEXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE EXTENDED, RE-PAVED AND RE-STRIPEDEXISTING LANDSCAPING & POND TO BE REMOVED; FOR FUTURE PARKING LOTEXISTING LANDSCAPED AREA & PLAYGROUND TO REMAINEXISTING PAVILIONS AT AUDITORIUM TO BE REMOVED FOR FUTURE ADDITIONSEXISTING PARKING LOT TO BE PARTIALLY RE-PAVED AND RE-STRIPEDEXISTING UPPER PLAZA TO BE ENLARGED, WITH CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING -EXTENTS SHOWN WITH RED HATCHEXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING AT UPPER PLAZA TO BE MODIFIED -SEE PROPOSED PLANS FOR MORE INFOEXISTING CHILDREN'S CLASSROOM BUILDINGSAPPROX 10-12' H; 6,142 SF TOTAL EXISTING ADULT CLASSROOM BUILDINGSAPPROX 10' H; 6,324 SF TOTAL22' H; 10,456 SF EXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 138 SPACES)EXISTING NURSERY BUILDING APPROX 13' H; 3,744 SF EXISTING ELECTRICAL ROOMEXISTING STORAGEEXISTING STORAGEAPPROX 10' H; 1,863 SF APPROX 10' H; 1,755 SF EXISTING GARAGEEXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALL FABRIC STRUCTUREAPPROX 22' H; 4,512 SF E X I S T I N G M E D I A B UI L D I N G A P P R O X 8 ' H ; 1 ,0 0 8 S F EXISTING STORM DRAIN -PROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING PARKING LOT(APPROX 60 SPACES)EXISTING UPPER PLAZA TO BE ENLARGED, WITH CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING -EXTENTS SHOWN WITH RED HATCHDEMO EXIST TRASH ENCLOSUREEXISTING STALLS TO BE RE-STRIPEDEXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAINEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE RELOCATEDEXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997EXISTING BACKFLOW DEVICE TO BE RELOCATED2.44M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021ENLARGED DEMOLITION SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZAA-81" = 30'-0"NORTHNOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTS EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 3EXISTING RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING(FELLOWSHIP HALL)NEW "TURF" PARKING LOTENLARGED PARKING LOT WITH NEW PAVING & STRIPINGMODIFIED ACCESS TO UPPER RESIDENCEMODIFIED PARKING LOT WITH NEW STRIPINGNEW CIRCULAR DECORATIVE SCREENNEW TRELLIS STRUCTURENEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND AISLESEXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 2EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 1TRELLIS100' - 0"TRELLIS60' - 0"62' - 0"12' - 1"62' - 0"38' - 0"NEW CIRCULAR WOOD SEATING AT TREE, TYP. OF (2)A-161A-16266' - 6"60' - 0"22' - 8"EXISTING AUDITORIUMPARKING LOT 3PARKING LOT 2(65 STALLS)PARKING LOT 1(78 STALLS)A-163EXISTING RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT14'-6" H15'-6" H(3) STALLS31,835 SF(105 STALLS)10' H; 2,356 SF 10' H; 2,356 SF 22' H; 10,456 SF APPROX 22' H; 4,512 SF APPROX 10' H; 1,612 SF NEW DECORATIVE SCREEN AT RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING (HEIGHT = 17''-0")NEW TRASH ENCLOSURENEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO FUTURE MODULARSRE-STRIPED EXISTING PARKING STALLSRE-STRIPED EXISTING PARKING STALLS(1-WAY)12' - 0"25' - 0"2 5 ' - 0 " (6 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A . @ 8'-6" EA.(3) STALLS(8 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A .(8) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA. @ 8'-6" EA.(7) STALLS@ 8'-6" EA.(6) STALLS(8) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.26' - 10"@ 8'-6" EA.(6) STALLSNEW CONCRETE WALK (260 SF)NOTE: RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDINGSHALL FOLLOW ALL APPLICABLE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PERMANENT STRUCTURE AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE1 8 ' - 0 "TYP.18' - 0"TYP.9' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"5' - 0"18' - 0"16'-4" @ 30 DEG.TYP18' - 0"TYP9' - 0"TYP5' - 0"8' - 0"(9) STALLS AT +/- 9'-5" EA.86' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"EXISTING STORM DRAIN -PROTECT IN PLACEEXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING WATER MAIN25' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 37' - 0"R 3 7 ' - 0 "TRASH TRUCK CIRCULATION -SHOWN DASHED25' - 0"(4 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " E A .EXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997WOOD SLAT BENCH WITH ACCESSIBLE WHEELCHAIR TRANSFER CLEAR SPACE, TYP. EXISTING RELOCATED BACKFLOW DEVICE25' - 0"2' - 0"NEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS 1 & 2, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFO5' - 6"F.F.= 2'-0" ABOVE GRADEF.F.= 2'-0" ABOVE GRADEF.F.= 2'-6" ABOVE GRADE(7 ) S T A L L S (7 ) S T A L L S(4) STALLS(9 ) S T A L L S(7 ) S TA L L S(8) STALLS(4) STALLS(9 ) STA LLS(5) STALLSEXISTING FOUNTAIN24' - 0"60' - 1"2' - 0"27' - 9"30' - 2"A-221ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE PLANNEW FIRE HYDRANTM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA - PHASE 1A-9NORTH1" = 30'-0"NOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTSPHASE 1DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK• RELOCATE (4) EXISTING MODULAR BUILDINGS• MODIFY EXISTING "UPPER PLAZA" INCLUDING CONCRETE PAVING & LANDSCAPING• ADD TRELLIS STRUCTURE, (2) DECORATIVE SCREENS, AND VARIOUS SITE FURNITURE & LIGHTING ELEMENTS AT "UPPER PLAZA"• MODIFY BOUNDARY OF, RE-PAVE & STRIPE PARKING LOTS 1 & 2 -SEE PARKING PLAN FOR MORE INFO• ADD NEW TURF PARKING LOT 3 -SEE PARKING PLAN FOR MORE INFOTOTAL ADDED BUILT AREA(NONE) RENOVATED AUDITORIUM(N) ADDITION25' H(N) ADDITION25' H(N) ADDITION25' HA-181PROPOSED AUDITORIUM RENOVATION & ADDITIONNEW MODULAR BUILDING DNEW MODULAR BUILDING ANEW ASPHALT PAVING & STRIPING AT EXISTING TURF LOT10' H, 1440 SF10' H, 1440 SFPARKING LOT 3105 STALLS31,835 SF(13) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.110' - 6"(12) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.102' - 0"(10) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.85' - 0"(9) STALLS @ 8'6" EA.76' - 6"24' - 0"24' - 0"42' - 0 "60' - 0"60' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"1 8 ' - 0 "2 4 ' - 0 "NEW MODULAR BUILDING C10' H, 1440 SFNEW MODULAR BUILDING B10' H, 1440 SFNEW STRIPING AT EXISTING LOTEXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 3EXISTING RELOCATED FABRIC BUILDING(FELLOWSHIP HALL)EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 2EXISTING RELOCATED MODULAR BUILDING 1(13) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.(12) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.102' - 0"(20) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.170' - 0"(16) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.NEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFOF.F.= 2'-0" ABOVE GRADEF.F.= 0'-0" ABOVE GRADE8' - 0"F.F.= 2'-0" ABOVE GRADENEW ELEVATED WALKWAY TO ACCESS MODULARS, WITH STAIRS AND FULLY-ACCESSIBLE RAMP -SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR MORE INFO10' - 0"24' - 0"60' - 0"24' - 0"10' - 0"60' - 0"13' - 10"10' - 0"24' - 0"9' - 0"24' - 0"60' - 0"6' - 6"24' - 0"18' - 0"9' - 0"3' - 8"5' - 0"2' - 0"6' - 6"2' - 0"2' - 0"2' - 0"M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 4 - NOVEMBER 10, 2021ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT UPPER PLAZA - PHASE 2A-101" = 30'-0"NOTE: ALL EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, OR TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED, HAVE BEEN PLANTED BY KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH AND THEREFORE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SCENIC OVERLAY CORRIDOR ZONE REQUIREMENTSNORTHTOTAL ADDED BUILT AREAMODULARS-MODULAR A1,440 SF-MODULAR B1,440 SF-MODULAR C1,440 SF-MODULAR D1,440 SF TOTAL5,760 SFAUDITORIUM RENOVATION & ADDITION-DEMOLISHED AREA -911 SF-ADDITION AREA3,704 SF TOTAL (NET)2,793 SFPHASE 2DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK• ADDITION OF (4) MODULAR BUILDINGS• INTERIOR RENOVATION OF EXISTING AUDITORIUM, PLUS (3) NEW WING ADDITIONS• FULLY PAVE & STRIPE PARKING LOT #3 (PREVIOUSLY ON TURF IN PHASE 1)• RE-STRIPE EXISTING PARKING LOTS #4 & #5TOTAL ADDED AREA8,553 SF AAAAAAAAE E W A Y 9 1 C A NYO N R O AD BBBA 2A A 2BAPARKING LOT 4EXISTING STALLS TO BE RE-STRIPED WITH NEW STRIPING PER CITY STANDARD, TYP.141 STALLS48,531 SF24' - 0"(16) STALLS @ 8'-6" EA.@ 8'-6" EA.(5) STALLSEXISTING MONUMENT SIGN TO BE REPLACED, AND RE-LOCATED OUT OF CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. .NOTE: SIGNAGE MODIFICATION WILL BE SUBMTITED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT; SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLYFUTURE CITY OF ANAHEIM RIGHT-OF-WAYSANTA ANA CANYON ROAD91 FREEWAYEXISTING PARKING LOT PAVING TO REMAIN24' - 0"NEW LANDSCAPING -SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MORE INFO18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"APN 354-321-03APN 354-321-03(5 ) S T A L L S @ 8 '-6 " EA .18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 4"18' - 0"(15) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.127' - 6"(14) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.119' - 0"(13) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.110' - 6"(5) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.42' - 6"EXISTING LANDSCAPED ISLAND, TYP.(15) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.127' - 6"(3 ) S T A L L S A T 8 '-6 " E A .(20) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.170' - 0"(12) STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.16' - 5"4' - 5"(17 STALLS AT 8'-6" EA.)144' - 6"EXISTING GRAVEL OVERFLOW PARKING LOT TO REMAINEXISTING PAVED OVERFLOW PARKING LOT TO REMAIN50' - 0"7' - 0"FUTURE CURB & GUTTER PER CIVIL PLANSSIGHT DISTANCE AREA -TO BE CLEAR OF ANY OBSTRUCTION ABOVE 24" IN HEIGHTM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 4 - NOVEMBER 10, 2021ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT LOWER PARKING LOTS - PHASE 2A-11NORTH1" = 30'-0" 1212M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE VIEWSA-121" = 80'-0"1KEY PLAN AT EXISTING PLAZA1" = 80'-0"2KEY PLAN AT PROPOSED PLAZAPRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ENTRY TO CAMPUS FROM LOWER PARKING AREAS. FACILITY USERS PASS THROUGH GENEROUS OPEN LANDSCAPED COURTYARDS FLANKED BY FELLOWSHIP PLAZAS.1VIEW INTO ONE OF TWO NEW FELLOWSHIP PLAZAS, THIS ONE DEFINED BY A LATTICE SCREEN MEANT TO EVOKE FORMS FOUND IN NATURE.2EXISTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPOSED 4343M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021EXISTING & PROPOSED SITE VIEWS (CONT.)A-131" = 80'-0"1KEY PLAN AT PROPOSED PLAZAVIEW PASSING UNDER NEW “FRONT PORCH”TRELLIS WITH THE REAR OF THE CHURCH PROVIDING A “GREEN WALL”BACKDROP. THIS IS THE MAIN TRANSITIONAL GATHERING AREA BETWEEN SERVICES.3NEW CANOPY TREES AND SITE FURNISHINGS ADDED BETWEEN EXISTING CAMPUS STRUCTURES ENHANCE THE SECURE PEDESTRIAN VILLAGE.41" = 80'-0"2KEY SITE PLAN AT EXISTING PLAZAEXISTINGEXISTINGPROPOSEDPROPOSED NOTE: ALL EXISTING SITE POLE LIGHTING AT DRIVEWAY & LOWER PARKING LOTS TO REMAIN, TYP. -HEADS TO BE REPLACED.SITE POLE-MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURES: BEACON "VIPER"TRELLIS-MOUNTED MICRO-PROFILE COVE LIGHT FIXTURE WITH INTEGRAL DRIVER: BOCA FLASHER "NANO-X"POST-MOUNTED AT CIRCULAR SCREEN & TREE SEATING ELEMENTS ACCENT LIGHT: BEACON "CADET"PATHWAY LIGHT: LUMUX "BL500-TALL"EXISTING SITE POLE-MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE -HEAD TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW BEACON "VIPER" HEADEXISTING SITE POLE-MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE -HEAD TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW KIM LIGHTING "BOUNCE" HEADM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021ENLARGED PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING PLAN AT UPPER PLAZAA-141" = 30'-0"SEE SHEETS A-19 & A-20 FOR PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES AT AUDITORIUM BUILDING EXTERIORNORTH M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021EXISTING SITE PHOTOSA-15LOOKING EAST TOWARD SITE ENTRYEXISTING MONUMENT SIGN AT SITE ENTRYDRIVEWAY TO OVERFLOW PARKING LOT #7PEDSTRIAN PATH FROM SITE ENTRY LOOKING SOUTHPARKING LOT #6 LOOKING NORTHPARKING LOT #5 LOOKING SOUTHPARKING LOT #1 LOOKING WESTMAIN AUDITORIUM AND FABRIC BUILDING LOOKING WESTPARKING LOT #2 LOOKING EASTPARKING LOT #4 LOOKING EASTEXISITNG POND / FUTURE PARKING LOT #3 LOOKING NORTHAERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST AAABCCBM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021PROPOSED SITE MATERIALS & FINISHES AT UPPER PLAZAA-16SHERWIN WILLIAMS POWDURA POWDER-COAT "PRB2-C0001 RUST"METAL FINISH14'-6" HIGH, 6" TUBE STEEL FRAME WITH POWDER-COATED FINISH DECORATIVE METAL LATTICE WITH POWDER-COATED FINISH SEATING ELEMENT AT TREEREFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ALL INFORMATION CONCERNING LANDSCAPE & HARDSCAPE MATERIALSTRELLIS STRUCTURECIRCULAR SCREENLAYERED BRICK BENCH CONSTRUCTIONSOLID WOOD PLANK AT BENCH SEATLAYERED BRICKCEDAR PLANK123MATERIALS & FINISHES REAR EXTERIOR WALL & SLAB TO BE COMPLETELY REMOVED FOR NEW BACK OF HOUSE ADDITIONEXISTING PLATFORM TO BE REPLACEDEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO BE MODIFIED FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO BE MODIFIED FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING EXTERIOR WALL AND STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED HVAC EQUIPMENT TO REMAIN -TYP.OPENINGS AT EXISTING ENTRY FEATURE TO BE MADE LARGEREXISTING INTERIOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE INCREASED VISIBILITY TO PLATFORM -TYP.EXISTING AUDIO-VISUAL CONTROL BOOTH TO BE REPLACEDAUDITORIUMWOMENMENVESTIBULECRY ROOMKITCHENSTORAGEELECT.MECHMECH.EXISTING INTERIOR WALLS TO BE REMOVED TO PROVIDE LARGER FOYER SPACE AND WELCOME KIOSKRISEREXISTING PAVILION TO BE REMOVED IN COMPLETE, FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING PAVILION TO BE REMOVED IN COMPLETE, FOR NEW "WING" ADDITIONEXISTING RESTROOMS TO BE RENOVATED440 SEATSM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021AUDITORIUM DEMOLITION PLANA-171/8" = 1'-0"NORTHTOTAL EXISTING AREA:TOTAL DEMOLISHED AREA: 10,456 SF -911 SF AREA TABULATIONS (E)AUDITORIUM016374 SFWING A121047 SFWING B131049 SFSTORAGE14662 SFSPEAKER'SGREENROOM19185 SFTECHPRODUCTIONSUITE15175 SFRESTROOM1863 SFI.T.ROOM1751 SFB.O.H.1135 SFHALLWAY20208 SFFOYER02701 SFMOM'SROOM0366 SF(E)KITCHEN07549 SF(E)ELECT.09100 SF(E)STORAGE0888 SFWOMEN05353 SFMEN04192 SF(E) RISER0617 SFNEW PLATFORM NEW WALLS WITH ENTRY DOORS AT FOYER SPACENEW CANOPY POSTS -SEE ELEVATIONNEW ROOF ACCESS LADDERNEW WALL-MOUNTED TRELLIS WITH VINES -SEE ELEVATION82' - 6"A-201A-203A-202A-2042' - 0"NEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR EXTRA SEATINGNEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR EXTRA SEATINGNEW BUILDING ADDITION FOR CHURCH BACK-OF-HOUSE FUNCTIONSAUDIO-VISUAL BOOTHEXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 36" H HEDGES -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 36" H HEDGES -TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 42" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.EXISTING ROOF ACCESS LADDERPLATFORM10929 SFEXISTING RENOVATED RESTROOMSMUSICIAN'SGREENROOM16189 SF25' - 0"NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP TO REPLACE EXISTING2' - 0"2' - 0"11' - 1"39' - 4"11' - 1"39' - 4"25' - 0"M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021AUDITORIUM RENOVATION PLANA-181/8" = 1'-0"NORTHTOTAL EXISTING AREA:TOTAL DEMOLISHED AREA: TOTAL PROPOSED ADDITION:NAME AREA(E) AUDITORIUM 6,374 SFHALLWAY 208 SFTECH PRODUCTION SUITE 175 SFSPEAKER'S GREEN ROOM 185 SFRESTROOM 63 SFI.T. ROOM 51 SFSTORAGE 662 SFFOYER 701 SF(E) KITCHEN 549 SFMOM'S ROOM 66 SFMEN 192 SFWOMEN 353 SF(E) RISER 17 SFWING A 1,047 SFWING B 1,049 SF(E) STORAGE 88 SF(E) ELECT. 100 SFB.O.H. 35 SFPLATFORM 929 SFMUSICIAN'S GREEN ROOM 189 SF13,035 SF 10,456 -911 +3,70413,249 SFTOTAL:TOTAL AREA:AREA TABULATIONSROOM SCHEDULECODE ANALYSISCONSTRUCTION TYPE:VB, SPRINKLEREDOCCUPANCY TYPE: A-3ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:60'ALLOWABLE AREA:24,000 SFGENERAL NOTES1. THE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE EXTENDED THROUGHOUT THE AUDITORIUM ADDITION AREAS AS REQUIRED BY THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND NFPA 13.2. A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED, INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT ALL AREAS OF THE AUDITORIUM AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3. BECAUSE OCCUPANT LOAD EXCEEDS 1,000 IN THIS BUILDING, FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE CAPABLE OF EMERGENCY VOICE EVACUATION FUNCTIONALITY AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE AND NFPA 72.4. PROJECT IS LOCATED IN VHFSZ. AUDITORIUM BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL THEREFORE COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC CHAPTER 7A AND 2019 CFC CHAPTER 49 620 TOTAL SEATSTOTAL EXISTING SEATS:440 TOTAL ADDED SEATS:180TOTAL # OF SEATS:62013,249 SF FDFDFDWHA-201A-203A-202A-204NEW WING A ADDITIONNEW WING B ADDITIONNEW BACK OF HOUSE ADDITIONNEW ENTRY CANOPYEXISTING BUILT-UP ROOFING, PARAPETS, AND ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS TO REMAIN, TYP.NEW ROOF ACCESS HATCH AND LADDERSCHEMATIC LOCATION FOR NEW ROOFTOP-MOUNTED MECHANICAL UNIT, TYP.19' - 9"19' - 2"19' - 9"14' - 10"14' - 11"22' - 0"22' - 0"T.O. (E) PARAPET WALL T.O. (E) PARAPET WALL (E)(E)(E)(E)(E)NEW BUILDING ADDITION WITH PARAPET WALLS TO SCREEN MECHANICAL UNITS2A-19NEW BUILDING ADDITIONNEW BUILDING ADDITION T.O. (N) PARAPET WALL 25'-0"T.O. (N) PARAPET WALL 25'-0"T.O. (N) PARAPET WALL 25'-0"82' - 4"SLO PE 1/4"/FTSLOPE 1/4"/FTSLOPE 1/4"/FTEXISTING ROOF LADDER16' - 6"T.O. (E) PARAPET WALL 8712PROVIDE NEW ADDRESS NUMBERS FLAT ON ROOF -PAINT IN CONTRASTING COLOR TO EXISTING ROOF COLOR.HEIGHT4' - 0"TYP. WIDTH2' - 0"12" - 18" SPACING6" THICK, TYP.EXISTING GRAVITY VENT, TYP. OF (2)NEW ROOF DRAIN & OVERFLOWNEW ROOF DRAIN & OVERFLOWNEW ROOF DRAIN & OVERFLOWNEW ROOF DRAIN & OVERFLOWSLOPE 1/4"/FT22' - 0" EXISTING PARAPETNEW REAR ADDITIONEXISTING AUDITORIUMSCHEMATIC LOCATION & SIZE OF ROOFTOP MECHANICAL UNITPARAPET WALL WITH VINE TRELLIS -SEE ELEVATIONROOFING ASSEMBLY 25' - 0" NEW PARAPETT.O. NEW ROOF19' -2" (LOW) - 20'-0" (HIGH)M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021AUDITORIUM ROOF PLANA-19NORTH1/8" = 1'-0"1/8" = 1'-0"2CONCEPTUAL SECTION @ ROOTFOP EQPMTGENERAL NOTES1. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF COLOR, AS REQUIRED PER MUNICIPAL CODE 18.18.090.02022. ANY ROOFTOP-MOUNTED ANTENNAS, DISHES, ETC. SHALL NOT EXCEED 6' IN DIAMETER OR DIGONAL LENGTH, PER MUNICIPAL CODE 18.18.090.030 NEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHWALL-MOUNTED STAINLESS STEEL TRELLIS FOR VINE GROWTHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZE22' - 0" (EXISTING)3' - 0"25' - 0"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGEXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZE25' - 0"NEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHEXISTING ROOF LADDER3' - 0"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 60" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. MULLIONS TO BE RE-PAINTED DARK BRONZENEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZING25' - 0"22' - 0"15' - 0"EXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS WITH SIDELIGHT AND TRANSOM, WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHNEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZINGNEW WALL-MOUNTED CANOPY WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW WALL SCONCE, TYP.NEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.10' - 0"3' - 0"EXISTING GROUND-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, FULLY-SCREENED BY 60" H PLASTERED PONY WALL -TYP.12' - 0"25' - 0"EXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW WING ADDITION WITH FLUTED METAL PANELS IN GRAY PAINTED FINISHEXISTING BUILDING WALLS TO RECEIVE NEW PAINT FINISHNEW BACK-OF-HOUSE ADDITION WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISHNEW HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME, PAINTED TO MATCH WALL FINISHNEW WALL-MOUNTED CANOPY WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISH8' - 6"NEW WALL SCONCE AT EXISTING ENTRY DOORSNEW UP-DOWN WALL SCONCE, TYP.NEW CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH DARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING AND LOW-E TINTED GLAZING16' - 6"12' - 0"NEW ROLL-UP DOOR WITH CORRUGATED METAL PANELS IN GALVANIZED FINISH2' - 0"25' - 0"M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021AUDITORIUM ELEVATIONSA-201/8" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION1/8" = 1'-0"2EAST ELEVATION1/8" = 1'-0"3SOUTH ELEVATION1/8" = 1'-0"4WEST ELEVATIONGENERAL NOTES1. ALL EXISTING AND NEW BUILDING HEIGHTS COMPLY WITH MAXIMUM HEIGHT PER CODE, WHICH IS 35' PER 18.18.090.2. ANY WALL-MOUNTED SIGNAGE SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT AABCDEFABBCDDDEEFFM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021AUDITORIUM MATERIALS & FINISHESA-21REAR ADDITION WALL-MOUNTED SYSTEM: STAINLESS STEEL CABLE BY "JAKOB ROPE"PAINT COLOR AT BUILDING "WINGS""WING" ADDITION EXTERIOR CLADDING, TYP: MBCI "AVP" FLUTED METAL PANEL IN "SLATE GRAY"VINE TRELLISFLUTED METAL PANELCORRUGATED METAL PANELREAR ADDITION EXTERIOR CLADDING & ENTRY CANOPY, TYP: MBCI "PBC" HORIZONTAL CORRUGATED METAL PANEL IN "GALVALUME"(PANEL TEXTURE)(PANEL COLOR)(PANEL TEXTURE)(PANEL COLOR)STOREFRONTDARK BRONZE ANODIZED FRAMING WITH TINTED LOW-E INSULATED GLAZING-TINT TO MATCH EXISTINGVIEW FROM NORTHWEST CORNERVIEW FROM SOUTHWEST CORNERPAINT COLOR AT MAIN BUILDING "SHELL"EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURESAT WING ADDITIONS: OCL "VEGA"; DARK BRONZE FINISHAT MAIN ENTRY POINTS: SONNEMAN "FOLD"; DARK BRONZE FINISH 16' - 0"8' - 0"0' - 6"5' - 6"2' - 0"0' - 6"6" HIGH CONC. SIDEWALK6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLIDA-222A-225A-223A-2244' - 0"3'-7" W X 5'-6" H MANGATE8'-0" W X 5'-6" H GATE WITH 180 DEGREE SWING6A-226" HIGH CONC. CURB#4 REBAR @ 24" O.C.2' - 0"2 1/2" X 2 1/2" X 1/4" TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR DOOR FRAME ATTACHMENT, TYP. BOTH SIDES2 1/2" X 2 1/2" X 1/4" TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR DOOR FRAME ATTACHMENT, TYP. BOTH SIDES4' - 0"6' - 0"8'-0" W X 5'-6" H PRE-FINISHED 18 GA. CORRUGATED METAL PANELS -BOTTOM OF DOOR SHALL CLEAR ADJACENT CURB2 1/2" X 2 1/2" X 1/4" TUBE STEEL COLUMN FOR DOOR FRAME ATTACHMENT, TYP. BOTH SIDESBAR WELDED TO INSIDE OF BOTH DOORS2 1/2" STL ANGLE DOOR FRAME, GALV & PAINTED3/4" SOLID SLIDE BOLT SYSTEM0' - 6"6' - 0"0' - 6"6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO PRECISION BLOCK IN "GRAY LW"6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO SPLIT FACE BLOCK IN "WHITE MW"5' - 6"0' - 6"6' - 0"6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO PRECISION BLOCK IN "GRAY LW"6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO SPLIT FACE BLOCK IN "WHITE MW"3'-7" W X 5'-6" H PRE-FINISHED 18 GA. CORRUGATED METAL PANELS -BOTTOM OF DOOR SHALL CLEAR ADJACENT CURBPANIC BAR AT INSIDE OF GATE6' - 0"0' - 6"2 1/2" STL ANGLE DOOR FRAME, GALV & PAINTED6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO PRECISION BLOCK IN "GRAY LW"6" X 6" X 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLID: ORCO SPLIT FACE BLOCK IN "WHITE MW"6' - 0"0' - 6"2' - 0"0' - 6"2' - 9"1' - 0"6" x 6" x 16" CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS; GROUT ALL CELLS SOLIDBOND BEAM#4 REBAR, TYP.2" X 2" X 3/16" ANGLE CURB GUARD, TYP.4" CONC. SLABM. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 3 - JULY 28, 2021TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILSA-221/2" = 1'-0"1ENLARGED TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN1/2" = 1'-0"2TRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION1/2" = 1'-0"3TRASH ENCLOSURE REAR ELEVATION1/2" = 1'-0"4TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION A1/2" = 1'-0"5TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION BNOTES:1. LOCATION, SIZE & NUMBER OF STRUCTURES WILL BE DETERMINED BY SANITATION INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT2. ALL HARDWARE TO BE CORROSION-RESISTANT1/2" = 1'-0"6TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTIONNORTH 150' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"24' - 0"20' - 0"24' - 0"20' - 0"24' - 0"R 17' - 6" TYP24' - 0"R 17 ' - 6 "R 17' - 6"20' - 0"2 0 ' - 0 "R 17' - 6"FIRE ACCESS ROAD, TYP. -20' MINIMUM WIDTH; 24' MINIMUM WIDTH AT OPEN PARKING SPACESHOSE PULL LENGTH (150' MAX), TYP.NEW FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEW FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION150' -0"< 150'-0"< 1 5 0 '-0 "NOTE: BUILDINGS AND ALL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC CHAPTER 7A AND 2019 CFC CHAPTER 49M. Steven Camp, Principal Architect6B Liberty #100, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 Tel. 949.488.0865, Fax. 949.488.0864www.elementsarch.comstevec@elementsarch.comARCHITECT:OWNER:PROJECT / LOCATION:8712 E Santa Ana Canyon RoadAnaheim, CA 92808Contact: Doug McAllisterdmcallister@kindredchurch.orgKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHKINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCH8712 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON RDANAHEIM, CA 92808CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE-SUBMITTAL 4 - NOVEMBER 10, 2021CONCEPTUAL FIRE CIRCULATION PLANA-23NORTH1" = 40'-0" SHEET INDEX APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION STAKING NOTICE UTILITY NOTE JOB SITE CONDITIONS UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES AND USES GENERAL NOTES FOR EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES FOR HILLSIDE GRADING PLANS WATER NOTES LEGEND UTILITY AGENCIES FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION ZONING INFORMATION LOCATION MAP REVISIONS SPECIMEN TREE NOTE LEGAL DESCRIPTION STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim ADDITIONAL NOTE LAND AREA FEEB BD DCCHHI IGGA A FRIVERSIDE FREEWAY 91SANTA ANA CANYON ROADLCREVISIONS ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 50 FT. ( IN FEET ) SHEET INDEX PAGE *SEE SHEET 3 FOR SECTIONS* SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD CITY TYPICAL SECTION 170 FROM 3300' E/O WIER CANYON ROAD TO 1600' W/O GYPSUM CANYON ROAD SECTION 'A' NTS REVISIONS ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim EASEMENT NOTES SECTION 'B-B' SECTION 'D-D'SECTION 'E-E' SECTION 'F-F'SECTION 'C-C' SECTION 'H-H' SECTION 'I-I' MANHOLE DETAIL SECTION G-G E E BBD D C C F ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim REVISIONS SEE SHEET 5 FOR CONTINUATIONSEE SHEET 5 FOR CONTINUATION *SEE SHEET 3 FOR SECTIONS* LEGEND F E BBHHIIF ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim REVISIONS SEE SHEET 6 FOR CONT INUAT ION SEE SHEET 4 FOR CONTINUATION SEE S H E E T 4 F O R C O N TI N U A TI O N SEE SHEET 6 FOR CONTINUATION *SEE SHEET 3 FOR SECTIONS* HII ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim REVISIONS SEE S H E E T 5 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN *SEE SHEET 3 FOR SECTIONS* SEE S H E E T 7 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N G GAARIVERSIDE F R E E W A Y 9 1 SANTA A N A C A N Y O N R O A D LC ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying E N G I N E E R I N G A N A C A L Anaheim REVISIONS SEE S H E E T 6 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN *SEE SHEET 3 FOR SECTIONS* · · DEVELOPMENT FEE NOTIFICATION NOTES ANACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING Civil Engineering and Land Surveying A N A C A L REVISIONS UTILITY NOTE UTILITY AGENCIES GRAPHIC SCALE 1 INCH = 20 FT. ( IN FEET ) 8712 E. SANTA ANA CANYON RD., ANAHEIM, CAS HE E T NU M BER date SCALE rev APPROVED BY issue d for Title 19-05 1" = 20'-0" All design, Ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Landscape Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to the commencement of work.KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHL1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT NUMBER DATEREV#ISSUED FOR DATEISSUE#ISSUED FOR P: 805-845-5707 C: 805-637-7905 info@lanegoodkind.com www.lanegoodkind.com L A N E G O O D KIN D + A S S O C IA T E S CCRENDS G R E ITC A LIFO R NIA APE A R C HLANE GOODKIND 2/28/2019 D ETISE A4375 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 7/29/21 CUP4 MUH REV MUH RIG NOL PAR SPO AIR RIB IND RHA LEA RIB IND RHA LEA ART DOU ART DOU BOT BAR LEY CON BOT BAR 24-SPO AIR ART DOU PER ARB ENC FAR 65-SPO AIR SPO AIR MUH RIG ART DOU LES FIL LES FIL BOT BAR BER NEV LEY CON SAL WIN RIB IND RIB IND PER ARB LEY CON PER ARB LEY CON BER NEV LEY CON SAL WIN ART DOU MUH REV MUH RIG NOL PAR SPO AIR LEY CON BAC PIL PER ARB ENC FAR MUH REV MUH RIG NOL PAR SPO AIR MUH REV MUH RIG NOL PAR SPO AIR MUH RIG SPO AIR PER ARB ENC FAR BER NEV BAC PIL LEY CON SAL WIN Rhu int BOT BAR LEY CON RIB IND RHA LEA QUE AGR JUG CAL JUG CAL JUG CAL 0 20 40 FTEXISTING WATER LINE EASEMENT PER M.M. 748/23-27EXISTING EASEMENT TO BALDWIN BUILDERS FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES INST. 19970643589 REC 12/16/1997Plant List ID Qty Category Latin Name Common Name Spacing Size Water Use ART DOU 144 Perennials Artemisia douglasiana Douglas Mugwort 3'0"1 gal low BAC PIL 10 Groundcover Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'Dwarf Coyote Bush 6'0"1 gal Low BER NEV 9 Shrub Berberis 'Nevinii'Nevin Barberry 8'0"5 gal low BOT BAR 247 Grasses Bothriocloa barbinodis Bluestem Grass 3'0"1 gal low LES FIL 100 Groundcover Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster'Carmel Aster 3'0"1 gal low ENC FAR 195 Perennial Encelia farinosa Brittle Brush 2'6"1 gal low LEY CON 496 grass Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'Canyon Prince Wildrye 2'0"1 gal low MUH REV 302 grass Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’Undaunted Ruby Muhly 2'6"1 gal low MUH RIG 154 grass Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 3'0"1 gal low NOL PAR 29 cacti-succulents Nolina nelsonii Parry's Nolina 5'0"5 gal low PER ARB 186 Category Peritoma arborea Bladderpod 4'0"1 GAL low RHA LEA 13 Shrub Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'California Coffee Berry 5'0"5 GAL low Rhu int 1 Shrubs Rhus integrifolia Lemonadeberry 10'0"5 gal Low RIB IND 78 Shrubs Ribes indecorum White Flowering Currant 5'0"5 gal low SAL WIN 27 Shrubs Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'Winifred Gillman Sage 4'0"1 gal low SPH AMB 42 Category Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert Mallow 5'2 1/4"1 gal low SPO AIR 501 grass Sporobolus airoides Sacaton 2'6"1 gal low LOW-LYING AREAS AND BIO-PLANTERS ART DOU - Artemisia douglasiana BOT BAR - Bothriocloa barbinodis CAR SPI - Carex spissa JUN PAT - Juncus patens 'Elk Blue' LEY CON - Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' SOL CAL - Solidago californica DRY GRASSLANDS & BIO-PLANTER EDGES MUH REV - Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’ SPO AIR - Sporobolus airoides ENC FAR - Encelia farinosa MUH RIG - Muhlenbergia rigens LES FIL - Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster' EPI CAT - Epilobium 'Catalina' UPLAND SAGE-SCRUB/CHAPARRAL ARC HOW - Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn' BAC PIL - Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt' SAL WIN - Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman' RIB IND - Ribes indecorum RHA LEA - Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf' CEA OLI - Ceanothus oliganthus BER NEV - Berberis 'Nevinii' QUE AGR - Quercus agrifolia QUE ENG - Quercus englemanii het arb - Heteromeles arbutifolia JUG CAL - Juglans californica PLA RAC - Platanus racemosa CONCRETE PAVING EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN DECOMPONSED GRANITE PERMEABLE UNIT PAVERS 8712 E. SANTA ANA CANYON RD., ANAHEIM, CAS HE E T NU M BER date SCALE rev APPROVED BY issue d for Title 19-05 1" = 20'-0" All design, Ideas, arrangements and plans indicated by these drawings and specifications are the property and copyright of the Landscape Architect and shall neither be used on any other work nor be disclosed to any other person for any use whatsoever without written permission. Written dimensions shall take precedence over scaled dimensions and shall be verified at the job site. Any dimensional discrepancy shall be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect prior to the commencement of work.KINDRED COMMUNITY CHURCHL1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN PROJECT NUMBER DATEREV#ISSUED FOR DATEISSUE#ISSUED FOR P: 805-845-5707 C: 805-637-7905 info@lanegoodkind.com www.lanegoodkind.com L A N E G O O D KIN D + A S S O C IA T E S CCRENDS G R E ITC A LIFO R NIA APE A R C HLANE GOODKIND 2/28/2019 D ETISE A4375 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 7/29/21 CUP4 N.58°19'18"E.650.22'QUE AGR 0 20 40 FT Plant List ID Qty Category Latin Name Common Name Spacing Size Water Use ART DOU 144 Perennials Artemisia douglasiana Douglas Mugwort 3'0"1 gal low BAC PIL 10 Groundcover Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt'Dwarf Coyote Bush 6'0"1 gal Low BER NEV 9 Shrub Berberis 'Nevinii'Nevin Barberry 8'0"5 gal low BOT BAR 247 Grasses Bothriocloa barbinodis Bluestem Grass 3'0"1 gal low LES FIL 100 Groundcover Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster'Carmel Aster 3'0"1 gal low ENC FAR 195 Perennial Encelia farinosa Brittle Brush 2'6"1 gal low LEY CON 496 grass Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince'Canyon Prince Wildrye 2'0"1 gal low MUH REV 302 grass Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’Undaunted Ruby Muhly 2'6"1 gal low MUH RIG 154 grass Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 3'0"1 gal low NOL PAR 29 cacti-succulents Nolina nelsonii Parry's Nolina 5'0"5 gal low PER ARB 186 Category Peritoma arborea Bladderpod 4'0"1 GAL low RHA LEA 13 Shrub Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf'California Coffee Berry 5'0"5 GAL low Rhu int 1 Shrubs Rhus integrifolia Lemonadeberry 10'0"5 gal Low RIB IND 78 Shrubs Ribes indecorum White Flowering Currant 5'0"5 gal low SAL WIN 27 Shrubs Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman'Winifred Gillman Sage 4'0"1 gal low SPH AMB 42 Category Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert Mallow 5'2 1/4"1 gal low SPO AIR 501 grass Sporobolus airoides Sacaton 2'6"1 gal low LOW-LYING AREAS AND BIO-PLANTERS ART DOU - Artemisia douglasiana BOT BAR - Bothriocloa barbinodis CAR SPI - Carex spissa JUN PAT - Juncus patens 'Elk Blue' LEY CON - Leymus condensatus 'Canyon Prince' SOL CAL - Solidago californica DRY GRASSLANDS & BIO-PLANTER EDGES MUH REV - Muhlenbergia reverchonii ‘Undaunted’ SPO AIR - Sporobolus airoides ENC FAR - Encelia farinosa MUH RIG - Muhlenbergia rigens LES FIL - Corethrogyne 'Smart Aster' EPI CAT - Epilobium 'Catalina' UPLAND SAGE-SCRUB/CHAPARRAL ARC HOW - Arctostaphylos 'Howard McMinn' BAC PIL - Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Pt' SAL WIN - Salvia clevelandii 'Winifred Gillman' RIB IND - Ribes indecorum RHA LEA - Rhamnus californica 'Leatherleaf' CEA OLI - Ceanothus oliganthus BER NEV - Berberis 'Nevinii' QUE AGR - Quercus agrifolia QUE ENG - Quercus englemanii het arb - Heteromeles arbutifolia JUG CAL - Juglans californica PLA RAC - Platanus racemosa CONCRETE PAVING EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING TO REMAIN DECOMPONSED GRANITE PERMEABLE UNIT PAVERS Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Responses to Comments Kindred Church Expansion Project Development Project Number: DEV2020-00016 Prepared for Planning Services Division City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by Psomas 5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 300 Santa Ana, California 92707 May 2022 Attachment 5 Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 1 Responses to Comments RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE KINDRED CHURCH EXPANSION PROJECT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the potential environmental effects of the proposed Kindred Church Expansion Project (Project) have been analyzed in an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) dated March 2022. The IS/MND was subject to a 30-day public review period which began on March 24, 2022 and ended on April 25, 2022. The City distributed a Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt an MND along with the IS. Three letters were received during the public review period from the following agencies: California Highway Patrol; Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation; and Orange County Parks (OC Parks). CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b) states that prior to approving a project, the lead agency must consider the proposed IS/MND together with any comments received during the public review process. Written responses to comments are not required; however, the City of Anaheim, as lead agency, has prepared a written response to the comment received for consideration by the City Council. The comment letter followed by the City’s response are attached. The number provided in the right margin of the comment letters corresponds to the response to the comment. Based on the evaluation in the IS/MND and the comment received, the City has determined that all potential impacts associated with the Project are less than significant with incorporation of identified mitigation measures (MMs). A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared and will be implemented for the Project. Therefore, the City of Anaheim has determined that an Mitigated Negative Declaration in accordance with CEQA is the appropriate environmental document for the Project. Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 2 Responses to Comments Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 3 Responses to Comments Response to Comment Letter A California Highway Patrol April 4, 2022 Response 1. The comment requests that the City forward future CEQA-related correspondence to the Special Projects Section of the California Highway Patrol. The comment is noted and the City’s CEQA distribution list has been updated accordingly. Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 4 Responses to Comments Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 5 Responses to Comments Response to Comment Letter B Juaneño Band of Mission Indians, Acjachemen Nation April 19, 2022 Response 1. The comment requests that the City provide the site records for the two prehistoric cultural resources in proximity to the Project site that are described in the Initial Study. The South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) did not provide the City with the site records for the two prehistoric cultural sites described in the Initial Study since they are outside of the Project site. Therefore, the City is not able to provide these records. However, the City is able to provide a spreadsheet that contains summary information on these resources. Response 2. The comment expresses approval of Mitigation Measures TCR-1 and TCR-2. The commenter’s support for these mitigation measures is noted. Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 6 Responses to Comments Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 7 Responses to Comments Kindred Church Expansion Project R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009402\Environmental Documentation\RTC\RTC_Kindred-Church-051222.docx 8 Responses to Comments Response to Comment Letter C Orange County Parks April 21, 2022 Response 1. This comment requests that the Project Applicant clearly define property lines and have a survey performed to demonstrate that the Project does not encroach on County property. A survey has been completed as part of the Project and can be provided to OC Parks if requested. Response 2. This comment requests that a barrier be included on the east edge of the parking lot adjacent to Santa Ana Canyon Road to delineate parking lot from the adjacent protected wildlands. This area of the Project site is near the overflow parking lots, which the Applicant had agreed with the City would not have any work occurring on it except for what is required to construct stormwater infiltration basins. Response 3. This comment requested that the Project include the removal of castor bean that exists along the property line in coordination with OC Parks. The Project includes the replacement of all landscape along the Project frontage, which will include castor bean removal. Response 4. This comment requests that the driveway be upgraded as part of the Project to accommodate the existing pedestrian and bikeway along Santa Ana Canyon Road and in foresight of the proposed Coal-Gypsum Canyon Trail. These improvements will be completed as part of a separate and future City project. The Applicant will fund a portion of these future City improvements along Santa Ana Canyon Road through a fee for future improvements. Response 5. This comment requests that appropriate signage for traffic ingress and egress be considered as part of the Project, in coordination with existing and likely future land uses along the road. The Project does not include off-site signage; however, the Applicant will fund a portion of future City improvements along Santa Ana Canyon Road, which will include signage improvements if required. Response 6. This comment states that the Applicant shall not allow any passage through park property or on unauthorized trails. This comment is noted. Response 7. This comment states that native plantings should be incorporated into the Project. This comment is noted. Native, low-maintenance, and severe-fire-hazard-zone-appropriate plantings would be planted as part of the Project, consistent with OC Parks’ comment.