Loading...
PC 2022/07/06.pdf City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, July 6, 2022 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Natalie Meeks • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Dave Vadodaria • Commissioners: Lucille Kring, LuisAndres Perez, Steve White, David Heywood, Michael Mouawad • Call to Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Roll Call • Items of Public Interest Oath or Affirmation of Allegiance – Swearing in of Planning Commissioner Michael Mouawad • Planning Commission Reorganization • Public Comments • OC Vibe Workshop • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website (www.anaheim.net/planningcommission) no later than 72 hours prior to the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 7 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Planning Commission Reorganization Appointment of a Planning Commission Chairperson (Motion) Appointment of a Planning Commission Chairperson Pro-Tempore (Motion) Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. OC Vibe Workshop July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 1 (Continued from June 6, 2022) DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 Location: 1442 North Dale Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval for an 18- unit, two-story, single-family attached residential development with 10-percent of the units affordable to moderate income buyers, with an affordable housing development incentive, and a density bonus. The request includes the following land use entitlements: i) a conditional use permit for a single-family attached residential development with modified development standards; and ii) a tentative tract map to establish a 1- lot, 18-unit condominium subdivision. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development) Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2020-00248 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-00536 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2021-00336 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06097 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19141 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Location: This property is located on north side of Broadway, approximately 275 feet east of Euclid Street (1661-1673 West Broadway). Request: The applicant requests approval of the following zoning entitlements: 1) A General Plan amendment to amend the land use designation from Office – Low to Mid Density Residential; Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 7 2) A zoning reclassification from the C-G (General Commercial) zone to the RM-3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone; 3) A conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the construction of a 34-unit, attached single-family residential project with modified development standards; 4) A tentative tract map to permit a 1-lot, 34 unit subdivision for condominium purposes; and 5) A development agreement to permit a voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06125 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00126 Location: 1100 North Tustin Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to demolish an existing 15,372 square foot two-story office building and construct an approximately 6,500 square foot drive through car wash with associated office space and sixteen self-service onsite vacuuming stations. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Elizabeth Yee eyee@anaheim.net July 6, 2022 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. 4 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131 Location: This approximately 4.3-acre property (Lot 5, Tract No. 17703) is located approximately 380 feet south of the intersection of East Katella Avenue and South Metro Drive, in an area of the City of Anaheim known as the Platinum Triangle. Request: The applicant requests approval of the final site plan for a multiple-family development with 73- residential dwelling units (for sale) and a conditional use permit to allow for above ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior setback and to allow for ground-floor private residential patios to encroach into the required setback between buildings. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 and associated Addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Lisandro Orozco LOrozco@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00022 Location: 1426 South Allec Street Request: The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an existing vehicle towing facility and automotive impound yard. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), (Common Sense). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Thomas Gorham tgorham@anaheim.net July 6, 2022 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NO. 6 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00017 Location: 2951 West Ball Road Request: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a 3,300-square foot indoor recreational facility located on the second floor of an existing commercial building. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Ivan Orozco IOrozco@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, July 18, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. July 6, 2022 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 5:00 p.m. June 30, 2022 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: _____________________________ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 8:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 8:00 de la mañana un día hábil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 LOCATION: 1442 North Dale Avenue (approximately 225 feet east of the northern terminus of Dale Avenue) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Chris Segesman of Bonanni Development, and the property owner is Judy Maria Boisseranc Gentry. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: 1. A conditional use permit for a 18 single-family attached dwelling units (townhomes) with modified development standards, which would include the following non-discretionary items: a five percent density bonus and Tier One development incentive for reduced interior lot line setbacks with two units affordable to moderate income households; 2. A tentative tract map to establish a one-lot, 18-unit condominium subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000- 15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; and: 1. Approve the attached draft resolution for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06121 (Attachment 1); and 2. Approve the attached draft resolution for Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 (Attachment 2) Development Permit No. 2021-00188, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 4 BACKGROUND: This item was presented to the Planning Commission at its meeting on June 6, 2022. The Chair opened the public hearing and received testimony from the project applicant and members of the public. Issues discussed included density, noise, perimeter wall design, parking, utility service, maintenance and security of private streets and private common areas, and trash collection. All correspondence received prior to the publishing of this report has been included as Attachment 8, including a presentation from the applicant. DISCUSSION: • Density: The proposed project meets the density permitted within the Low-Medium Density Residential land use designation, with the application of a five percent density bonus allowed per California Government Code Section 65915. The designation permits a maximum of up to 18 dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac), which equates to 16 dwelling units allowed on the 0.93-acre project site. The proposed project is providing 10 percent of the 18 units for moderate income households (two units). Based on the proposed level of affordability, the proposed project would qualify for a five percent density bonus per Section 65915, which equates to an additional two dwelling units (or 19.4 dwelling units per acre as proposed). • Noise: The applicant has prepared a noise study demonstrating compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) standards related to development within close proximity to a highway. Average outdoor noise would be 63 decibels where up to 65 decibels would be allowed for outdoor common areas. Interior noise levels would be reduced to less than the permitted 45 decibels with the incorporation of insulated windows as required by the California Building Code (CBC). The noise study is provided as Attachment 4. • Perimeter Wall Design: The Code allows up to an 8-foot tall wall, although a wall is not required when separating multiple-family residential zones. Staff supports any height of wall 8-feet or less in compliance with Code. • Parking: State law and the City’s Housing Incentives Ordinance allow reduced parking ratios for qualifying developments. The table below compares the amount of parking required for a Density Bonus Housing Development and the proposed number of parking spaces provided. No. of Bedrooms Units Parking Ratio Total Parking Spaces Two- Bedroom 7 units 2 spaces/unit 14 Three- Bedroom 11 units 2 spaces/unit 22 Total Parking Required 36 Total Parking Provided 41 Development Permit No. 2021-00188, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 4 Accordingly, the project would comply with Code required parking and provide a surplus of five spaces. The City does not have the authority to require additional parking spaces; however, staff has recommended a condition of approval requiring residents to use designated parking spaces only for the parking of vehicles. Further, the applicant has revised the CUP Justification Letter to include language for the CC&Rs to address parking rules (Attachment 5). • Utility Service: The applicant has provided a sewer study to Public Works demonstrating that there would be adequate capacity to serve the new development within the private sewer mainlines. In addition, the applicant has provided written confirmation from the City of Buena Park that there is capacity within the public sewer mainlines serving this development. • Maintenance and Use of Private Property: At the prior hearing, the City Attorney opined that the Planning Commission should not weigh-in on private financing related to private parties. The applicant intends to engage in additional discussions with the Parkdale HOA regarding this matter to find an agreeable solution between the two parties. The applicant has provided an updated letter regarding outreach efforts that have occurred since the first public hearing (Attachment 6). • Trash Service: The project has been designed to include trash bins that will be stored in the garages of the units and serviced by a truck that can circulate within the community. There would also be a designated area for bulky item pickup. The proposal has been approved by Public Works Streets & Sanitation staff. Housing Accountability Act (HAA): Pursuant to Government Code Section 65589.5: “When a proposed housing development project complies with applicable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and criteria, including design review standards, in effect at the time that the application was deemed complete, but the local agency proposes to disapprove the project or to impose a condition that the project be developed at a lower density, the local agency shall base its decision regarding the proposed housing development project upon written findings supported by a preponderance of the evidence on the record that both of the following conditions exist: (A) The housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety unless the project is disapproved or approved upon the condition that the project be developed at a lower density. As used in this paragraph, a “specific, adverse impact” means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. (B) There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact identified pursuant to paragraph (1), other than the disapproval of the housing development project or the approval of the project upon the condition that it be developed at a lower density.” Development Permit No. 2021-00188, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Should the Planning Commission decide to deny the project or require development at lesser density, it must make written findings pursuant to the text above, citing a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions, as prescribed by State Law. CONCLUSION: The June 6, 2022 staff report is provided as Attachment 3 and contains the complete project analysis. Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is compatible with surrounding land uses and designed in a manner to provide a quality living environment for its future residents and valuable amenities and resources for the surrounding community. In addition, the proposed project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs, would provide affordable housing in furtherance of the City’s Housing Element, and is consistent with the City Council’s policy identifying affordable housing as a priority. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP Scott Koehm, AICP Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Draft Tentative Tract Map Resolution 3. Planning Commission Staff Report June 6, 2022 (without attachments) 4. Noise Study 5. Revised Conditional Use Permit Justification Letter 6. Updated Public Outreach Summary 7. Project Plans 8. Correspondence 9. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00188) (1442 NORTH DALE AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121 to permit the construction of an 18-unit attached, single-family residential project with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in the interior landscape setback and building-to-building setback requirements of the "RM-3" Multiple-Family Residential Zone, for that certain real property generally located 225 feet east of the northern terminus of Dale Avenue and commonly referred to as 1442 North Dale Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121 is proposed in conjunction with and a tentative tract map to permit a 1-lot, 18 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes, which is designated as "Tentative Tract Map No. 19177", and Development Permit No. 2021-00188 for a five percent Density Bonus and a Tier One development incentive for interior setbacks. Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, and Development Permit No. 2021-00188 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.93 acres in size and is currently developed with a single-family home, detached garage, and two accessory structures. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low Medium density residential land uses. The Property is located in the “T” Transition zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property, and pursuant to the provisions of the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, single-family, attached dwelling developments within the RM-3 (Multiple- Family Residential) zone are subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Table 6-A of Section 18.06.030 (Uses). Pursuant to subsection .030 of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), the minimum setbacks set forth in Section .090 of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) may be modified in order to achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If approved, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121 will permit the reduction in building-to- building setbacks and interior landscape setback; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on June 6, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to - 2 - PC2022-*** hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to July 6, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .030 (Modification of Other Standards) of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121: 1. The uses within the project are compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area. The proposed buildings are single-family attached, two-story residential project at a density and scale that is compatible with the surrounding single-family-attached, two-story residential uses in the vicinity. 3. Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate because the project entry has been designed in accordance with City standards and new stop signs will be installed adjacent at the project entry. 4. The Project is consistent with any adopted design guidelines applicable to the Property because the project has been designed to include quality architecture, sound attenuation, common recreational areas, and sufficient building setback buffers from the existing Parkdale townhome community. 5. The size and shape of the site proposed for the Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area because the project has been designed to include Code compliant parking and recreational areas, sufficient building setbacks from the surrounding townhome community, and new pedestrian paths within the neighborhood. - 3 - PC2022-*** 6. The traffic generated by the project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the Project and infrastructure has been designed to sufficiently accommodate traffic generated by the project. 7. The Project will comply with the General Plan and zoning for the property because the project will provide for the development of a quality single-family attached living environment with design amenities, such as private open space or common recreation areas. The permitted density range under the Low-Medium density residential designation is from zero to 18 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed project will have a density of 19.4 dwelling units per acre. 8. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve and adopt Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption by the Planning Commission of a resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, which entitlements are now pending; and (2) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent - 4 - PC2022-*** jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2022-*** - 7 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121 (DEV2021-00188) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 The owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 2 The owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 3 The owner/developer shall ensure all required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 4 The owner/developer shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services 5 The owner/developer shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services 6 The owner/developer shall Submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control Public Works, Development Services - 8 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. 7 The owner/developer shall submit a Preliminary Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 8 The owner/developer shall submit a copy of the approved permit and/or other form of approval of the project from the following agency: Caltrans Public Works, Development Services 9 At the time of grading plan submittal, a Fire Master Plan (Fire access plan) shall be submitted by the owner/developer to Anaheim Fire & Rescue for review. Anaheim Fire & Rescue PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 10 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, plans shall be submitted by the owner/developer showing four-way stop control at the project access/Peppertree Drive intersection. Stop signs shall be installed and stop legends shall be painted prior to final building and zoning inspection. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 11 The owner/developer shall record Tract Map No. 19177 pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Code. Provide a duplicate photo Mylar of the recorded map to the City Engineer's office. Public Works, Development Services 12 The owner/developer shall provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 13 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained by the owner/developer from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 14 The owner developer shall ensure that all Landscape plans comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Public Works, Development Services 15 The owner/developer shall submit plans demonstrating the following: Access to Rescue Windows and Other Required Openings All buildings equipped with openings, as required by the Fire and Building Code shall be provided with an approved direct access route from the fire access road to accommodate fire department operations. The access route shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in width and be designed to accommodate a twenty-one (21) foot fire department ladder. A clear area of at least eight (8) feet in width shall be maintained free of permanent obstructions below all required rescue windows to allow for fire department ladder placement. This shall be covered in the Fire Master Plan. Anaheim Fire & Rescue - 9 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 16 The owner/developer shall ensure that all California Building Code and California Fire Code requirements are followed for permit issuance. Any fire permits which includes fire sprinklers, fire alarm, etc shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire Department. Anaheim Fire & Rescue PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 17 Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections, the owner/developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an amendment to the CC&R’s approved by the City Engineer, Planning Director and the City Attorney's office shall be recorded. Gates, if any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 18 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, fire lanes shall be posted by the owner/developer with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 19 If fire hydrants for proposed project are private hydrants serving this site, the owner/developer shall submit CC&R’s to Anaheim Fire & rescue for review and approval covering the private fire hydrants (if applicable). Anaheim Fire & Rescue 20 All public improvements shall be constructed by the owner/developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 21 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full by the owner/developer. Public Works, Development Services 22 The owner/developer shall set all Monuments in accordance with the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 23 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works, Development Services 24 The owner/developer shall ensure that each individual residence or unit is clearly marked with its appropriate number and address. These shall be positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular and pedestrian Police Department - 10 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT pathways throughout the complex. Main building numbers shall be a minimum height of 12” and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers shall be illuminated during hours of darkness. 25 The owner/developer shall ensure: • All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. • The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece. • Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device shall be designed into all dwelling-unit front doors and all solid doors where exterior visibility is compromised. Police Department 26 The owner/developer shall ensure: • Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. • Adequate lighting of parking lots and associated carports, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to residences shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department GENERAL 27 The owner/developer shall contact the Yorba Linda Water District, Engineering at (714) 701-3100 regarding all applicable Water Standards and Fees. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 28 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” signs shall be posted by the owner/developer at the entrances of parking areas and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2” lettering. All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owner’s/manager’s request. Police Department 29 The owner/developer shall ensure: • Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of Police Department - 11 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. • Trees shall not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. 30 Residential buildings/units shall be pre-wired by the owner/developer for the future installation of an alarm system. Police Department 31 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: 1. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles. 2. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the Association or City of Anaheim staff. 3. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Planning Director or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. 4. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 32 Prior to final map approval, the Developer shall execute and record against the Property a Density Bonus Housing Agreement in a form and substance acceptable to the Planning Director and the City Attorney, and if required by the Density Bonus Housing Agreement, a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (“CC&R’s”) that sets forth the terms and conditions of approval of said Density Bonus. The Density Bonus Housing Agreement/CC&R’s shall be binding on the Developer and all future owners and successors in interest thereof. The Density Bonus Housing Agreement shall require the Density Bonus units to be offered for sale to the initial buyer of the Density Bonus units at an affordable housing cost to moderate income households and shall include the requirement for an equity sharing agreement, whereby the initial buyer of each Density Bonus unit shall enter into an agreement with the City requiring each such initial buyer to pay to the City upon the initial resale of each Density Bonus unit Community and Economic Development Department - 12 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT the City's proportional share of appreciation in accordance with paragraph .0105 (For-Sale Housing) of subsection .010 (Approval) of Section 18.52.040 (General Density Bonus) of the Code. 33 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 34 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 35 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00188) (1442 NORTH DALE AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 to establish an 18-unit subdivision for attached single-family homes for that certain real property generally located 225 feet east of the northern terminus of Dale Avenue, commonly referred to as 1442 North Dale Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 is proposed in conjunction with approval of a conditional use permit to permit the construction of 18 attached single-family residences. Development Permit No. 2021-00188 including Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.93 acres in size and is currently developed with a single-family home, detached garage, and two accessory structures. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low Medium density residential land uses. The Property is located in the “T” Transition zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property, and pursuant to the provisions of the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387); and - 2 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, on June 6, 2022, 5:00 p.m. the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to July 6, 2022, at 5:00 p.m.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed subdivision of the Property is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the Low Medium density residential land use designation which provides for development up to 18 dwelling units per acre. 2. The proposed design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim including street and utility improvements. 3. The proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the “RM-3” Multiple-Family Residential zone, which is the implementing zone for the Low-Medium density land use designation as required pursuant to California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California Government Code. 4. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project in that the 0.93-acre site allows for the development of the 18-unit attached single-family residential subdivision in compliance with the RM-3 zone and Housing Incentives development standards. 5. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. 6. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 7. The design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, or the proposed improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares - 3 - PC2022-*** that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19177, contingent upon and subject to the adoption of a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121, now pending; and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6 , 2022. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section 17.08.170 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 (DEV2021-00188) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP 1 All existing structures in conflict with the future property lines shall be demolished by the owner/developer. The owner/developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division prior to any demolition work. Public Works, Development Services 2 The vehicular access rights to Dale Avenue shall be restricted and relinquished by the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim. Public Works, Development Services 3 The owner/developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 4 The final map shall be submitted by the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works, Development Services 5 The owner/developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 6 The owner/developer shall vacate all existing easement in conflict with proposed improvements. Public Works, Development Services 7 The owner/developer shall provide a Monumentation bond in an amount specified in writing by a Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works, Development Services 8 The owner/developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 9 The existing public storm drain easement located along the northerly end of the project site shall be adjusted by the owner/developer so that the easement boundaries encompasses the existing public storm drain infrastructure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 10 The owner/developer shall apply for an Encroachment License for all improvements proposed over the existing public storm drain easement located along the northerly side of the project site. Proposed improvements are limited to fences with intermediate posts, low lying plants, and nonstructural site concrete pavement as approved by the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 11 The owner/developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, Planning and Building Department, - 7 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Services Division 12 Prior to final map approval, the owner/developer shall execute and record against the Property a Density Bonus Housing Agreement in a form and substance acceptable to the Planning Director and the City Attorney, and if required by the Density Bonus Housing Agreement, a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (“CC&R’s”) that sets forth the terms and conditions of approval of said Density Bonus. The Density Bonus Housing Agreement/CC&R’s shall be binding on the Developer and all future owners and successors in interest thereof. The Density Bonus Housing Agreement shall require the Density Bonus units to be offered for sale to the initial buyer of the Density Bonus units at an affordable housing cost to moderate income households and shall include the requirement for an equity sharing agreement, whereby the initial buyer of each Density Bonus unit shall enter into an agreement with the City requiring each such initial buyer to pay to the City upon the initial resale of each Density Bonus unit the City's proportional share of appreciation in accordance with paragraph .0104 (For-Sale Housing) of subsection .010 of Section 18.52.040 (General Density Bonus) of the Code. Community and Economic Development Department 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JUNE 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 LOCATION: 1442 North Dale Avenue (approximately 225 feet east of the northern terminus of Dale Avenue) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Chris Segesman of Bonanni Development, and the property owner is Judy Maria Boisseranc Gentry. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: 1.A conditional use permit for a 18 single-family attached dwelling units (townhomes) with modified development standards, which would include the following non-discretionary items: a five percent density bonus and Tier One development incentive for reduced interior lot line setbacks with two units affordable to moderate income households; 2.A tentative tract map to establish a one-lot, 18-unit condominium subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Class 32 – In-Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000- 15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; and: 1. By motion, adopt the attached draft resolution for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06121 (Attachment 1); and 2. Adopt the attached draft resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 (Attachment 2) ATTACHMENT 3 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 2 of 7 BACKGROUND: The property is 0.93 acres and is designated for Low Medium Density Residential land use in the General Plan, and is located in the Transition “T” zone. The property is developed with a 1,910 square-foot single-family home, 930 square-foot detached garage, 900 square-foot concrete pad, and two accessory structures. The property is currently accessible by an existing private alley from Dale Avenue, north of Peppertree Drive. The property is surrounded by townhomes (Parkdale Community) to the south, east, and west. A landscaped slope of State Route (SR)-91 borders the project site to the north. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct an 18-unit attached, single-family residential development (townhomes) using the RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential zone development standards. The units would be in three two-story buildings, ranging from five to eight units per building. The units would consist of an attached two-car garage, with three different plan types of two to three bedrooms, and ranging in size from 1,045 to 1,560 square feet. There would be 41 parking spaces, including 36 garage spaces and five open spaces. The project would provide over 6,400 square feet of recreation-leisure area, including a passive landscaped community area and private patios. Two of the units would be designated as affordable to moderate income households. Landscape Plan The project would be accessed from Dale Avenue on Pepper Tree Drive via an existing access easement through the Parkdale Community as shown on the encumbrance map below. The northerly access easement would not be used for the proposed project. DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 3 of 7 Encumbrance Map Design: The buildings would be two stories tall with a maximum height of 28 feet. Varying wall planes and rooflines would articulate the front façade of each building. Exterior design finishes would include a variety of complementary accent colors and materials including asphalt shingles, painted stucco, cement plaster, board and batten fiber cement siding, and vinyl shutters to articulate the façades. With the exception of the entry driveway along Peppertree Drive, the entire project site would be enclosed by a six-foot tall wall consisting of tan, vinyl fencing along the northern boundary and a six-foot tall tan concrete masonry along the western, southern, and eastern boundaries. Looking Northeast from the Parkdale Community FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested entitlement action: Conditional Use Permit: Pursuant to the State of California’s Housing Accountability Act (HAA), most recently amended in 2019, properties with a General Plan designation that allows for residential uses, but that have a zoning designation that does not allow for residential uses, are not required to reclassify the property’s zoning to be consistent with the General Plan when residential DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 4 of 7 uses are proposed. Rather, the property may be developed for residential uses in accordance with the density prescribed by the General Plan land use designation. In this instance, the General Plan designates the subject property for Low Medium Density land uses, which allows residential density at 18 dwelling units per acre, and the property’s zoning is Transition. Therefore, pursuant to the HAA, the property would be subject to the RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential zone development standards, which is the implementing zone for the Low Medium Density General Plan designation, and would not require a zoning reclassification. Before the Planning Commission may approve the conditional use permit for a multiple-family planned unit development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The uses within the project are compatible; 2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing buildings conform with the provisions of this title; 3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; 5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7) The project complies with the General Plan and any applicable zoning or specific plan; and 8) The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The project complies with the development standards of the RM-3 zone and “Housing Incentives” specified in Chapter 18.52 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC), with the exception of the building-to-building and interior landscape setback. In the RM-3 zone, development standards including setbacks, may be modified as part of a conditional use permit as described below. The project would be at an overall greater density than the Parkdale Community (19 du/ac versus 11 du/ac); however, both are within the Low Medium Density General Plan designation. Although development standards would allow for three-story development in this area, the applicant has proposed two-story buildings providing compatibility with the surrounding Parkdale Community design, including scale, massing, bulk, and orientation. Further, the project would have a less than significant impact to nearby roadways and intersections, as concluded in the Trip Generation Memo provided within Attachment 5; therefore, the project would not impose an undue burden, and the existing streets are designed sufficiently to carry the traffic in the area. Building-to-Building Setback: The applicant requests to modify the minimum required setbacks to 24-feet, where the Municipal Code requires a 30-foot separation between two-story buildings with parallel walls that are designated as “primary” walls. Primary walls are building walls that contain an entrance and/or windows opening into living areas. Setbacks for projects in the RM-3 zone may be modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The proposed project would provide reduced building-to-building setbacks of 24-feet at the narrowest point, and this is consistent with modifications granted previously to similar projects. The two-story primary building elevations with a reduced setback would be DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 5 of 7 separated by drive aisles for garages, and would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. The applicant has designed elevations with offset second story windows, and enhanced and articulated architecture with quality design features. The proposed modification would help achieve a functional design with larger private patios on the elevations opposite the garages to provide for a high-quality living environment. Interior Setback: The applicant requests to modify the interior landscape setback along a 78-foot portion of the west property line. The Code identifies a five-foot landscape setback, and 3’-3” would be provided. The reduced setback would provide for adequate ingress and egress for the property, as well as an additional parking space. The reduced landscape area would include a six- foot tall property line wall to serve as a buffer between the two properties. Although an additional parking space is not required by Code as described in the parking analysis below, staff believes the additional space would be beneficial to the project. Further, the reduced setback would provide good design that would ensure compatibility with the surrounding community and would meet the intent of the interior setback requirement by providing an adequate buffer between the two communities. Parking: State law and the City’s Housing Incentives Ordinance allow reduced parking ratios for qualifying developments. The table below compares the amount of parking required for a Density Bonus Housing Development and the proposed number of parking spaces provided. No. of Bedrooms Units Parking Ratio Total Parking Spaces Two-Bedroom 7 units 2 spaces/unit 14 Three-Bedroom 11 units 2 spaces/unit 22 Total Parking Required 36 Total Parking Provided 41 Accordingly, the project would comply with Code required parking and provide a surplus of five spaces. Density Bonus: The proposed project meets the density permitted within the RM-3 zone, with the application of a five percent density bonus allowed per California Government Code Section 65915. The RM-3 zone permits a maximum of up to 18 dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac), which equates to 16 dwelling units allowed on the 0.93-acre project site. The proposed project is providing 10 percent of the 18 units for moderate income households (two units). Based on the proposed level of affordability, the proposed project would qualify for a five percent density bonus per Section 65915, which equates to an additional two dwelling units (or 19.4 dwelling units per acre as proposed). Housing Incentives: Pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.52.090 (Development Incentives), development incentives for affordable housing development are categorized as “Tier One” and “Tier Two” incentives. Tier One incentives are not subject to discretionary review or DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 6 of 7 denial. The project qualifies for one Tier One incentive and would implement a 10-foot interior lot line setback accordingly. Affordable Housing: The City Council has adopted a policy emphasizing the importance of affordable housing, and the applicant has proposed a 10-percent affordable housing project as described previously. Accordingly, the applicant has executed a Memorandum of Understanding with City staff (Attachment 6), and the project would be conditioned to require the applicant to enter into a Density Bonus Housing Agreement with the City. Tentative Parcel Map: Pursuant to AMC Section 17.08.100 – Advisory Agency Duties, before the Planning Commission may approve the tentative tract map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and applicable specific plan; 2) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and applicable specific plan; 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development; 4) That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; 5) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; 6) That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 7) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Tentative Tract Map No. 19177 is proposed to create a one lot subdivision by for 18 condominium units. The proposed density of 19.4 dwelling units per acre for the affordable housing project would be permitted with the proposed density bonus as previously described. The project would comply with applicable development standards (except for the modified standards subject to approval of a conditional use permit described above), would not cause any environmental impacts (discussed below), would not create any public health impacts, and would not conflict with easements acquired by the public. The project would comply with all subdivision requirements, and staff recommends approval of the tentative tract map request. Community Outreach and Correspondence: The applicant held a community meeting with the Parkdale Homeowners’ Association (HOA) on September 7, and November 3, 2021, with the applicant reporting that approximately 80-100 residents attended the second meeting. The applicant conducted other meetings and calls to coordinate with various parties related to the HOA. The applicant has provided a summary of the community outreach as Attachment 4. Environmental Impact Analysis: The Project qualifies for a Class 32 – In -Fill Development Project Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15332 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). Based on the analysis in the CEQA Class 32 Categorical Exemption Environmental Checklist (Attachment 5), staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00188, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06121, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19177 June 6, 2022 Page 7 of 7 requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further environmental review is required. CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is compatible with surrounding land uses and designed in a manner to provide a quality living environment for its future residents and valuable amenities and resources for the surrounding community. In addition, the proposed project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs, would provide affordable housing in furtherance of the City’s Housing Element, and is consistent with the City Council’s policy identifying affordable housing as a priority. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP Niki Wetzel, AICP Senior Planner Deputy Planning and Building Director Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Draft Tentative Tract Map Resolution 3. Conditional Use Permit Justification Letter 4. Public Outreach Summary 5. Class 32 Checklist 6. Density Bonus Memorandum of Understanding 7. Project Plans 8. Aerial Map 9. Vicinity Map CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE PAGE 1 NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT 18 ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1442 DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING & BUILDING PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION 200 ANAHEIM BOULEVARD, #145 ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92805 REPORT PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 2211 S. HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 92240 JUNE 21, 2022 ANAH 007 ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE PAGE 2 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE PAGE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Project Site Location and Setting .......................................................................................................... 5 3. Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 7 4. Noise Analysis ........................................................................................................................................ 7 5. Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 11 CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 4 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 5 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the exterior and interior noise levels for a future residential development that is proposed at 1442 Dale Avenue in the City of Anaheim. B onanni Development is proposing to construct an 18-unit single-family, attached residential development in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project site is located adjacent to and south of the Artesia Freeway (S tate Route 91). A more detailed description of the proposed pro ject site and the proposed development are provided in Sections 2 and 3. This report consists of the following sections: ● Section 1 - Introduction, provides an overview of the report’s format and content. ● Section 2 - Project Site Location and Setting, describes the project location and environmental setting. ● Section 3 - Project Description, includes an overview of the proposed development. ● Section 4 - Noise Analysis, discusses the potential noise exposure impacts. ● Section 5 – Conclusions, include a summary of the analysis and presents the findings of the analysis. 2. PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND SETTING The 0.9-acre project site is located in the northwestern portion of the City of Anaheim. The City of Anaheim, located approximately 20 miles southeast of Downtown Los Angeles and is bounded on the north by Fullerton, Placentia, and Yorba Linda; on the east by Corona and unincorporated Orange County; on the south by Orange, Stanton, and Garden Grove; and on the west by Cypress, Buena Park, and Cerritos. Regional access to the City of Anaheim is provided by three area highways: Interstate 5 (I-5), which extends in a southeast to northwest orientation going through the City; State Route 91 (SR-91), which traverses the northwestern portion of the City in an east to west orientation; and State Route 57, which traverses the central-western portion of the City in a north to south orientation.1 The project site is located at 1442 Dale Avenue, just south of the SR-91 Freeway. The location of the site is shown in an aerial photograph provided in Exhibit 1. The project site is developed as single-family residential and the surrounding area is developed as multiple- family residential. The surrounding land uses are described below:2 ● North of the site. The Artesia Freeway (SR 91) extends along the project site’s north side. The freeway is elevated approximately 25 feet from the ground level near Dale Avenue. The freeway right-of-way (ROW) is set back approximately 10 feet from the project site’s north property line. ● West of the site. Residential land uses are located to the west of the project site. Dale Avenue is located further west. 1 Google Maps and City of Anaheim Zoning Map. Website accessed on June 17,2022. 2 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site survey. Survey was conducted on June 18, 2022. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 6 EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT LOCATION Source: Google Maps Noise Measurement Location Project Site SR-91 Freeway CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 7 ● East of the site. Residential land uses are located to the east of the project site. ⚫ South of the site. Peppertree Lane extends along the project site’s south side. Residential development is located further south, south of the aforementioned roadway.3 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a request to construct an 18-unit multiple-family residential development within the 0.9-acre site. Of the total number of units, seven units will consist of two bedrooms and eleven units will contain three bedrooms. The three-bedroom units will have an exterior private yard. The proposed development will also have a common open space recreation area in the site’s southeastern corner. The proposed project’s site plan is illustrated in Exhibit 2. 4. NOISE ANALYSIS CHARACTERISTICS OF NOISE Sound is mechanical energy transmitted by pressure waves through the air and is characterized by various parameters that include sound frequency, the speed of propagation, and the pressure level or energy content (amplitude). Noise is most often defined as unwanted sound. Noise levels may be described using a number of methods designed to evaluate the "loudness" of a particular noise. The most commonly used unit for measuring the level of sound is the decibel (dB). Zero on the decibel scale represents the l owest limit of sound that can be heard by humans. At the other extreme, the hearing may be severely damaged at 140 dB. The human ear can detect changes in sound levels greater than 3.0 dBA under normal ambient conditions. Changes of less than 3.0 dB are noticeable to some people under quiet conditions while changes of less than 1.0 dB are only discernible by a few people under controlled, extremely quiet conditions. In general, an increase of between 3.o dB and 5.o dB in the ambient noise level is considered to represent the threshold for human sensitivity. Noise levels may also be expressed as dBA where an “A” weighting has been incorporated into the measurement metric to account for increased human sensitivity to noise. The A - weighted measurements correlate well with the perceived noise levels at lower frequencies. Noise levels associated with various activities are shown in Exhibit 3. Noise may be generated from a point source, such as machinery, or from a line source, such as a roadway segment containing moving vehicles. Because the area of the sound wave increases as the sound gets further and further from the source, fewer energy strikes any given point over the surface area of the wave. This phenomenon is known as “spreading loss.” Due to spreading loss, noise attenuates (decreases) with distance. Stationary, or point, noise subject to spreading loss experiences a 6.0 dBA reduction for every doubling of the distance beginning with the initial 50-foot distance.4 Noise emanating from traveling vehicles, also referred to as a line source, decreases by approximately 3.0 dBA 50 feet from a source over a hard, unobstructed surface such as asphalt, and by approximately 4.5 dBA over a soft surface, such as vegetation. For every doubling of distance thereafter, noise levels drop another 3.0 dBA over a hard surface and 4.5 dBA over a soft surface.5 3 Google Earth. Website Accessed June 17, 2022. 4 United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Report dated September 2018. 5 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 8 EXHIBIT 2 PROJECT SITE PLAN Source: Bonanni Development CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 9 165 160 155 150 145 140 sonic boom 135 130 125 jet take off at 200 ft. 120 115 music in night club interior 110 motorcycle at 20 ft. 105 power mower 100 95 freight train at 50 ft. 90 food blender 85 electric mixer, light rail train horn 80 75 70 portable fan, roadway traffic at 50 ft. 65 60 dishwasher, air conditioner 55 50 normal conversation 45 refrigerator, light traffic at 100 ft. 40 35 library interior (quiet study area) 30 25 20 15 10 rustling leaves 5 0 Serious Injury Pain Discomfort Physical Injury Threshold of Hearing EXHIBIT 3 TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS SOURCE: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Noise Levels – in dBA CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 10 Time variation in noise exposure is typically expressed in terms of the average energy over time (called Leq), or alternatively, as a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. For example, the L50 noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 50% of the time. Half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level. Other values that are typically noted during a noise survey include the L min and Lmax that represent the minimum and maximum noise levels obtained over a given period, respectively. EXISTING AMBIENT NOISE ENVIRONMENT An Extech Model 407730 Digital Sound Meter was used to conduct the noise measurements. A series of 100 discrete intervals were recorded at a location that was located 100 feet from the nearest SR-91 freeway travel lane (refer to Exhibit 1). The measurements were taken on a Saturday morning at 11:00 AM. Table 1 indicates the variation in noise levels over time during the measurement period. The ambient noise environment was dominated by vehicular traffic travelling on the adjacent SR-91 Freeway. Table 1 summarizes the results of the noise measurement survey. The average noise levels during the measurement period were 63.1 dBA. Table 1 Noise Measurement Results Noise Metric Noise Level (dBA) for Location 1 Lmax (Maximum Noise Level) 76.1 dBA L99 (Noise levels <99% of time) 75.1 dBA L90 (Noise levels <90% of time) 65.7 dBA L75 (Noise levels <75% of time) 64.3 dBA L50 (Noise levels <50% of time) 62.5 Lmin (Minimum Noise Level) 45.6 dBA Average Noise Level 63.1 dBA Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. REGULATORY SETTING Since the entire development site is located between approximately 65 feet and 250 feet from the nearest travel lane of the SR 91 Freeway, specific protocols must be adhered to ensure that interior and exterior noise exposure standards are adhered to. The distance between the nearest north-facing building elevation and the closest freeway ROW would be 10 feet. The distance between the property line and the freeway’s nearest travel lane is approximately 60 feet. Noise level regulations related to freeway noise exposure for both interior and exterior noise, are governed by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 18.40.090 as follows: ● Interior Noise – The City’s interior noise standard for the nearest habitable room is 45 dB. The maximum potential exposure involves five units located in the northwestern portion of the site and three units in the northeastern portion of the site. The north-facing elevations are located approximately 15 feet from the northern property line. ● Exterior Noise – The City’s exterior noise standard for the nearest outside yard areas is 65 dBA. The maximum potential exposure involves the rear yards for five units in the northwestern portion CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 11 and three units in the northeastern portion. These rear yard areas abut the northern property lin e and are located approximately 75 feet south of the freeway’s nearest travel lane. 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS Presently, noise levels on-site would not exceed 45 dBA given the exterior noise levels of 63.1 dB and taking into account a 20 dB reduction when for noise attenuation. Roadway noise emanating from the SR-91 Freeway will be reduced by complying with the California Green Building code, which requires the use energy-efficient windows and insulation. Insulation will be placed between the joists and studs and will serve as an additional buffer which when combined with stucco and drywall, will reduce interior noise levels by a minimum of 10.0 dBA.6 Noise reductions of up to 20 dBA are possible with closed windows.7 Therefore, roadway noise emanating from the freeway will be attenuated by an additional 20 dBA, bringing average interior noise levels below the 45 dBA threshold established in the City’s Municipal Code. EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS A majority of the exterior noise that will impact the project site will continue to originate from the adjacent freeway travel lanes. The existing vegetation and the elevational differences between the project site and the freeway travel lanes, will continue to contribute to some reduction in traffic noise levels where a direct line of sight will be partially obstructed. In addition, the spreading loss will result in a further reduction in noise levels. The maximum potential exposure area involves the rear yards for five, three-bedroom units located in the northwestern portion of the project. These rear yard areas abut the northern property line and are located approximately 75 feet south of the freeway’s nearest travel lanes. However, the ambient noise levels measured at these locations were found to average 63.1 dBA which is below the exterior threshold level of 65 dBA. As a result, the exterior noise levels from freeway traffic will not exceed the 65 dBA threshold outlined in the City’s municipal Code. 6 California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol – Table 7-1 FHWA Building Noise Reduction Factors. Report dated 2013. 7 Ibid. CITY OF ANAHEIM ● NOISE STUDY BONANNI DEVELOPMENT ● 1442 DALE AVENUE AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, AND NOISE STUDY ● Page 12 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. Public Outreach Communication Log 1442 N Dale Avenue Updated Communication - Post June 6, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing: June 7th – 17th Emails to Meridith Gill (HOA Manager) Emails were sent to Meridith Gill on June 7th, June 9th, June 15th, June 16th, and June 17th in efforts to try and schedule a meeting and/or address any further concerns the Parkdale Community needed answered. On June 16th we were able to schedule a Zoom call (zoom call was requested by Parkdale) for June 29th at 6:00pm. Previous Communication is listed below: September 7, 2021 Attendees: Meridith Gill (Diversified Association) – Association Manager (Parkdale HOA), (3) HOA board members, and (1) resident. Time: 11:30am I reached out to Meridith to schedule a meeting that took place on Tuesday, September 7, 2021. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce myself, start the dialogue about the proposed project, discuss the future perimeter wall, show the main site entrance and to answer any questions. I brought a colored site plan along with two pages showing proposed elevations. This material was left with Meridith after the meeting concluded. Comments from the meeting were as follows: 1.The proposed site plan showed a 3ft. wall along the Peppertree driveway. They made it clear that their preference would be that the entire site be surrounded by a 6ft. block wall. They want the proposed development to be totally separated. 2.Parking was discussed. As a community they will be moving towards a parking decal system for their residence. A community patrol service would be utilized to ticket/tow any vehicle that does not have a required decal. 3.We discussed the proposed development would be two-story in nature to fit in with the existing community. 4.The community expressed interest in having me attend one of their monthly meetings to discuss the project and answer any questions from their community. I let them know that I was available at any time to attend. ATTACHMENT 6 Wednesday, October 6, 2021 Phone Call w/ Tary Loomis – Attorney for Parkdale Community Tary Loomis reached out on behalf of the Parkdale HOA to inquire about the project and gather information. On the phone we briefly discuss the September 7th onsite meeting. Tary informed me that she has been the Parkdale Community since the inception. And, recently, due to the proposed development, she was brought on to look into the shared easements that give access to our project at 1442 N Dale Avenue. I took the time to explain the easement situation on Peppertree Lane along with the back alley adjacent to the Caltrans right-of-way. Tary asked if I could send over the Preliminary Title Report for her viewing. On Thursday, October 7th @ 11:15am I sent Tary Loomis and Meridith Gill a copy of the Preliminary Title Report and Encumbrance Map (Prepared by Walden & Associates – Civil Engineer for Bonanni Development). November 3, 2021 Parkdale Monthly HOA Meeting 7:00pm @ Parkdale Club House In coordination with Meridith Gill, I was asked to attend the November 3rd monthly Parkdale HOA meeting to discuss the Dale Project and answer any questions from the current residence. The meeting took place at the Parkdale Club House, which sits directly across from the 1442 N. Dale site. Approximately 80-100 people were in attendance. To better educate the community, I printed on a poster board the shared easement information and diagram, along with the site plan. Opening the meeting, I explained the two shared access easements that are recorded documents and in place for both communities. Then, discussed the overall project vision. Some key points that were discussed are: (1) The proposed townhome community will all be 2-stories and not the standard 3-story. (2) The enhanced landscaping and new block wall that will be built. (3) Garage space will be monitored by the HOA association to make sure garages are used only for vehicle parking only and not storage. (4) The new community will be self-contained and run by its own HOA. Most residence at the meeting attended to gain an understanding about the overall project. Overall, the concerns were parking, density, ingress/egress, homelessness on the Caltrans property, and making sure the community was completely separated. There were two requests that came out of the meeting in which we will make sure are incorporated. The first request was making sure before demo rodent control is to be conducted. There was concern over rodent infestation once the site is graded. The Second, a stop sign be added at the community exit, before making a right-handed turn onto Peppertree. Meeting approximately ended at 8:00pm. It was made clear to the residence and Meredith that I would be available any month moving forward if there are further questions. Thursday, January 20, 2022 Zoom meeting with City of Anaheim staff and Mer idith The list of questions below were provided by Mer idith Gill and were covered at the meeting. My quick notes are in red. Below is the list of question I had when we met last. These questions are the maj ority of what the homeowners have expressed at meetings held prior with the board and with the developer. 1. Concerns Regarding Access to the Community (private property). Only one access in and out of the community. This is directly through Parkdale THOA. Excessive amount of traffic will now impact Parkdale THOA. This will include trash pickups. Legally there is a shared easement on Peppertree Lane that allows for ingress and egress. We covered the easement language, so everyone has a clear understanding. Fire and emergency services only have one way in and out. The development has incorporated a fire hammerhead turnaround that meets the requirements set forth by Anaheim Fire. The hammerhead design has been approved by Anaheim Fire. This was explained and shown to Meredith. Concerns regarding common area usage, dumpster usage, and pool area usage as well. Parkdale will be forced to have a walking guard to remove trespassers as there are no boundaries. Explained that development has been approved by Anaheim Trash and each unit would have three trash bins, per code. The community will consist of individual trash service. 2. Drainage Parkdale THOA is requesting a written plan of proposed drainage and how this will impact drainage into the Parkdale THOA. Dave Bacon from Walden & Associates participated in the call and reviewed the drainage plan, sewer plan, and water plan. Explained to Meredith that everything is being designed to City standards. 3. Parking Parkdale is requesting a Parking Impact report from the City. Nick Taylor from the City of Anaheim addressed this portion. Explained that a Parking Study is not required for the development because there is an affordability component making parking by-right. New community is only proposing five total parking spaces. One is handicap, the other is for electric vehicles. This is not enough parking and will impact Parkdale and the City street parking. Explained the proposed development is by-right parking and meets the standards. Concerns regarding the homeowners of the new condo project parking within Parkdale THOA. This will affect parking within Parkdale. Parkdale will be forced to have a permit system that will requ ire a significant cost increase for patrols, such as requiring 24-hour permit enforcement. Cost impact for this community will be significant. Discussed how the new development will monitor garage space in making sure garages are used for vehicle parking only. Also, stated, like Parkdale is responsible for their parking management, the new developments HOA would also be faced with the same concerns. Both communities are open without an enclosed gate entrance. 4. Perimeter Wall Parkdale requesting non-root invasive trees be planted along the fence line. The Landscape Plan accounts for this request. Parkdale requesting the perimeter fence line be 8 feet for privacy. It was stated that this request is fine, pending review by City staff. 5. Construction Homeowners have concerns regarding the construction noise and mess. What will the hours be, and dates of construction? How will the developers ensure Parkdale will not be inundated with dust in their community from construction? Stated that construction woul d be under the rules and regulations set forth by the City of Anaheim. The construction team would work closely with Meredith and her team to ensure dust management is in place. Homeowners are requesting a copy of the Environmental Impact Report. The project is Category Exempt. EIR is not needed because the development is designed to city zoning code standards. Homeowner concerns regarding safety during new construction. Will the lot be monitored 24/7 until construction is completed? There is a large homeless population along CALTRANS. It was stated that security would be added in the PM hours, if needed. Hope this helps and see you tomorrow. Thank you, Meridith Gill Senior HOA Manager Diversified Association Management 180 E. Main St., Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92780 Office: (714)544-7755 ext. 114 January 21, 2022 -Email to Meridith from the Civil Engineer To maintain open communication, Marcos from Walden & Associates was instructed to send the Utility Plan over to Meredith. Good morning Meridith, Allow me to reintroduce the Walden team. We are the Civil Engineers working for Chris (Bonanni) and were also on the virtual meeting yesterday. Dave Bacon was doing the talking as I was in the background. As requested, attached is the Utility plan that was presented. Thank you for the very productive meeting. Please feel to reach out if you have any additional questions. Thank you Marcos F. Padilla, P.E. Walden & Associates 2552 White Road, Suite B Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 660-0110 (949) 660-0418 fax mpadilla@waldenassociates.net January 25, 2022 -Email communication string with Meridith post City meeting. Thank you. I will let you know when the Board meeting is next week if there are any questions as well. Thanks, Meridith Gill Senior HOA Manager Diversified Association Management 180 E. Main St., Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92780 Office: (714)544-7755 ext. 114 Information contained in this communication may be confidential and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination distribution, or copying of this communication or any of its contents is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error please return it to the sender and contact: Diversified Real Property Management at 714.544.7755 On Jan 25, 2022, at 3:35 PM, Chris <chris@bonannidevelopment.com> wrote: Hi Meridith, If you need anything from us or have any further questions, let me know. Have a wonderful night! Chris Segesman Bonanni Development 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Suite 120 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone: (714) 892-0123 www.bonannidevelopment.com From: Meridith Gill <meridith@diversifiedhoa.com> Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 2:36 PM To: Marcos Padilla <mpadilla@waldenassociates.net> Cc: Chris <chris@bonannidevelopment.com>, Dave Bacon <dbacon@waldenassociates.net> Subject: Re: Dale Project-Diversified HOA Good afternoon. It was a very productive meeting, I appreciate it, and the utility plan. Please let me know when Buena Park reaches out to you for any agreement needed from Parkdale as well. Have a great day, Meridith Gill Senior HOA Manager Diversified Association Management 180 E. Main St., Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92780 Office: (714)544-7755 ext. 114 February 24, 2022 - Email from Meredith to the City of Buena Park and Walden & Associates From: Meridith Gill <meridith@diversifiedhoa.com> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2022 5:11 PM To: Marcos Padilla <mpadilla@waldenassociates.net> Cc: Kim, Kenneth <kkim@buenapark.com>; McGee, Mike <MMcgee@buenapark.com>; Moore, Frank <FMoore@buenapark.com>; Dave Bacon <dbacon@waldenassociates.net>; Chris <chris@bonannidevelopment.com> Subject: Re: Dale Project and Diversified/Parkdale HOA Coordination Good afternoon, I meet with the HOA and Board next Wednesday. I will follow up with any questions/concerns they may have further. If the City of Buena Park can reach out to me asking what specificities they need from the HOA to move forward that would be helpful and appreciated. Thanks, Meridith Gill Senior HOA Manager Diversified Association Management 180 E. Main St., Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92780 Office: (714)544-7755 ext. 114 CS1 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA PROJECT TEAM Developer Bonanni Development 5500 Bolsa Avenue, Ste 120 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 714-892-0123 Contact: Chris Segesman Civil Engineer Walden & Associates 2552 White Road Irvine, CA 92614 949-660-0110 Contact: David Bacon Architect WHA. 3767 Worsham Avenue, Long Beach, CA, 90808 949-250-0607 Contact: Eric Scott, Rick Aiken Landscape Architect Studio PAD 23276 S. Pointe Dr., Ste. 103 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 949-770-8530 Contact: Peter Duarte SHEET INDEX CS1 Cover Sheet CS2 Project and Zoning Information Landscape Architecture L-1 Schematic Landscape Plan L-2 Schematic Wall Plan L-3 Schematic Planting Plan L-4 Schematic Open Space Plan L-5 Schematic Lighting Plan Architecture A1.10 Architectural Site Plan A1.11 Conceptual Renderings A1.20 Fire Access Site Plan A1.21 Refuse Pickup and Staging A2.10 Building Type ‘A’ - Building Plans A2.11 Building Type ‘A’ - Building Plans A2.12 Building Type ‘A’ - Elevations A2.20 Building Type ‘B’ - Building Plans A2.21 Building Type ‘B’ - Elevations A2.30 Building Type ‘C’ - Building Plans A2.31 Building Type ‘C’ - Building Plans A2.32 Building Type ‘C’ - Elevations A3.11 Unit Plans - Units 2A A3.12 Unit Plans - Units 3A A3.13 Unit Plans - Units 3B A4.10 Color and Material Board Civil TT-1 Tentative Tract Map C1.1 Preliminary Grading Plan C1.2 Preliminary Utility Plan C1.3 Existing Site Plan PROJECT SUMMARY Land Use Designation Low-Medium Density Zoning (Current) T (Transitional) Zoning (Implementing Zone) RM-3 (Multi-Family Residential) Total Site Area: 0.929 Acres (40,485 S.F.) Total Units: 18 Dwelling Units Density (Gross): 19.4 du/acre (2,247 s.f./du) Parking: 41 Spaces Garage:36 Spaces Open (off-street):5 Spaces HW Y 5 HWY 91 LA PALMA AVEBEACH BLVDSTANTON AVEDALE STDALE AVEPEPPERTREE MAGNOLIA STPROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT NO. 7 ZONING INFORMATION / PROJECT SUMMARY TABULATIONS PROJECT INFORMATION / ZONING COMPLIANCE ZONING NOTES Zoning Conformance Matrix SUBJECT CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED Land Use Designation Low-Medium Density Low-Medium Density Zoning Zoning Map T (Transitional)RM-3 (Multi-Family Residential) (Implementing Zone) Density AMC 18.06.040, 18.52.040 (Density Bonus) 1 du/ 2,400 S.F. Lot Area (Maximum) 1 du/ 2,285* S.F. Lot Area = 18 DU (17.70 du allowed to round up per 18.52.040.0203) (*5% Bonus allowed with 10% Mod. Inc. Affordable) 18 Dwelling Units (1 du/ 2,248 S.F. Lot Area) Affordable Housing AMC Chapter 18.52 Not Required 2 Moderate Income Affordable DU provided on-site Parking AMC 18.52.100 36 Spaces ( 7) 2-Bedroom x 2.0 Sp = 14 Spaces (11) 3-Bedroom x 2.0 Sp = 22 Spaces Guest: None Req’d 41 Spaces Garage: 36 Spaces Open (off-street): 5 Spaces Accessible = 1 Space (5 x 5%) Open Space AMC 18.06.100 6,300 s.f. 350 s.f./unit x 18 unit = 6,300 s.f. 6,409 s.f. (see Landscape Plans) 4,215 s.f. Common + 2,194 s.f. Patio Site Coverage AMC 18.06.080 45% Max Coverage (40,458 s.f. x .45 = 18,206 s.f.) 43.3% Coverage (17,530 s.f. / 40,458 s.f.) Setback Minimums AMC 18.06.090, 18.40.040, 18.52.090 Structural Setback (Private Street) 15 feet Structural Setback (Interior*) 10 feet* Structural Setback (Freeway) 10 feet *Setback Reduction per 18.52.090, Table 52-G Note: Cornices, eaves, belt courses, sills,...may encroach into a required setback along an interior property line not more than four (4) inches for each one (1) foot of the width of the interior setback, and may encroach into a required street setback not more than thirty (30) inches Structural Setback (Private Street) 15 feet Structural Setback (Interior*) 10 feet* Structural Setback (Freeway) 10 feet Projections (Interior and Street) 30 inches Building Height AMC 18.06.060 3 Story, 40 Feet Max.2 Story, 28 Feet Landscape Setback AMC 18.06.090 5 Feet Minimum at Interior Lot Lines and Private Streets 3 Feet Minimum Parking Standards (Standard 470) Stall Size (90°) 8.5 ft x 18 f t Garage 10 ft x 20 f t per space Two-Way Aisle Width (Backout) 24 ft Site Coverage Calcs Bldg 1 8,015 S.F. Bldg 2 4,210 S.F. Bldg 3 5,305 S.F. Total 17,530 S.F. CS2 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA Unit Tabulation Unit Name Unit Type Count Unit Area Total Unit Area Unit 2A 2 Bed/ 2.5 Ba 4 Units 1,155 S.F. 4,620 S.F. Unit 2B 2 Bed/ 2.5 Ba 3 Units 1,045 S.F. 3,135 S.F. Unit 3B 3 Bed/ 2.5 Ba 11 Units 1,560 S.F. 17,160 S.F. TOTAL 18 Units 24,915 S.F. Land Use Designation Low-Medium Density Zoning (Current) T (Transitional) Zoning (Implementing Zone) RM-3 (Multi-Family Residential) Total Site Area: 0.929 Acres (40,485 S.F.) Total Units: 18 Dwelling Units* 2-Bedroom Units 7 Units (38.9%) Unit 2A 4 Units Unit 2B 3 Units 3-Bedroom Units 11 Units (61.1%) Unit 3B 11 Units *10% of total units are Moderate Income Affordable per AMC Chapter 18.52 Density (Gross): 19.4 du/acre (2,247 s.f./du) Parking Provided: 41 Spaces Garage: 36 Spaces Open (off-street): 5 Spaces Required Accessible (5 x 5%) = 1 Spaces (Unassigned Open) Open Space Total Open Space Provided: 6,409 S.F. Total Common Open Space: 4,215 S.F. Total Private Open Space (Patios): 2,194 S.F. Building Tabulation Bldg # Bldg Type Unit 2A Unit 2B Unit 3B Total Bldg 1 Type A 0 2 6 8 Bldg 2 Type B 4 1 0 5 Bldg 3 Type C 0 0 5 5 Total 4 3 11 18 Schematic Landscape Plan 1 L-1 Community open space area with real turf for passive usage and canopy shade trees. Two community cluster mailboxes and one parcel locker, per USPS review and approval. Proposed wall, pilaster, gate or fence, per Wall & Fence Plan. Proposed tree, per Planting Plan. 4' wide community natural colored concrete sidewalk, with light top-cast finish and saw-cut joints. Accessible parking stall and striping, per Civil plans. EV charging station, to be coordinated with Electrical Engineer's plans. Guest parking stall. Private patio / yard area, homeowner maintained. Common area landscape, builder installed and HOA maintained. Property line. Enhanced vehicular paving at project entry. Proposed sidewalk within private property, for accessibility and connectivity, per coordination with Civil Engineer. Transformer to be screened with landscape, quantity and final locations to be determined. Proposed AC condenser locations, per Architecture plans. Evergreen buffer/hedge planting. Public storm drain easement, per Civil Engineer's plans. 12. 11. 10. 5. 9. 8. 7. 6. 4. 3. 2. 1. LEGEND 4 *Conceptual images (provided herein are conceptual and subject to change) 8'0 16'32' Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0'' 1442 Dale Avenue - Anaheim, CA Bonanni Development Project No.: BD04 Date: March 31, 2022 4th City Submittal 13. 14. 15. 16. 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 55 5 55 76 8 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 16 16 12 17. 17 17 12 Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement. Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement. STOPSTOP STOPSTOP2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) 3B 3B #1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C' PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT PRIVATE ALLEY GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 VIEW TRIANGLE PER STD. 115-B PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PARCEL "C" PARCEL "A" Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work P E P P E R T R E E D R I V E WALL LEGEND 6'-0" High (on sides) 8'-0" high (north) vinyl fence (tan color). 6'-0" High precision CMU wall, with rolled cap (tan blended color). 3'-6" High precision CMU patio wall, with rolled cap (tan blended color). 6'-6" High (16"sq.) precision block pilaster, with 18" sq. [2'' high] precision cap (tan blended color). 6'-0" High vinyl swing gates (tan color). 3'-6" High metal patio gate (black color). ± 5' High landscape evergreen screen / hedge. ADA Path of Travel Schematic Wall & Fence Plan 1 L-2 1442 Dale Avenue - Anaheim, CA Bonanni Development Project No.: BD04 Date: March 31, 2022 4th City Submittal 2 3 4 5 6 8'0 16'32' Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0'' 10ft min. patio dimension, per City requirements. See Sheet L-4 (Schematic Open Space Plan) for patio dimensions and square footages. Orco Tan Blended Color Option 1: Tuscany Orco Tan Blended Color Option 2: Borrego 2 3 4 2 3 4 67 1 5 7 Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement.Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement. (2) CMU mailboxes and (1) parcel locker unit ADA Path of Travel connecting to ROW, mailboxes, common space area, and accessible parking.10ft min.Min. 10ft clearance required between STOP bar and property wall. No landscaping shall exceed 24'' in height within this zone . STOP STOPSTOP2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) 3B 3B #1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C' PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT PRIVATE ALLEY GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 VIEW TRIANGLE PER STD. 115-B PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PARCEL "A" Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work P E P P E R T R E E D R I V E Type/Form PLANTING LEGEND Symbol Specimen Street Trunk Single Single Botanical Name (Common Name) Suggestions Tristania conferta (Brisbane Box) Ulmus parvifolia 'True Green' (Chinese Elm 'True Green') Size 24" Box 15 G/24'' Box TREES Canopy Single 15 G/24'' Box Deciduous Medium Medium Qty. Platanus racemosa (California Sycamore)Medium (R3) 1 7 3 Lagerstroemia i.x f. 'Natchez' (Crape Myrtle)Deciduous SingleFlowering 15 Gal Medium 7 Wucols TOTAL = 40 Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cajeput Tree) Single 15 G/24'' Box 8MediumPodocarpus gracilior (Fern Pine Tree)Buffer Low Prunus Bright N' Tight (Bright N' Tight Carolina Laurel)Columnar Single 15 Gal Medium 14 Schematic Planting Plan NOTES: 1. Irrigation (including spray and/or drip) will be provided, in the Construction Document phase, and to be installed per local California water regulations (AB1881) . 2. Transformers, back-flow preventers & other above-ground utilities to be screened with landscape as permitted per local codes & regulations. 3. The plant palette listed provides a list of plant material to select from when preparing final landscape construction documents for this project. However, substitutions may be required due to availability, soils tests, or other conditions. 4. All trees within 5' of hardscape to be installed with deep root barriers. 5. All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). 6. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. 7. Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. 8. Only low groundcover planting to be planted within the public storm drain easement. No trees allowed within public storm drain easement. L-3 1442 Dale Avenue - Anaheim, CA Bonanni Development Project No.: BD04 Date: March 31, 2022 4th City Submittal 8'0 16'32' Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0'' VINES & ESPALIERS Bougainvillea 'Monka' Bougainvillea Macfadyena unguis-cati Cat's Claw Vine (Oo-La-La® Bougainvillea) Antigonon leptopus Coral Vine Low Low Low Ligustrum japonicum "Texanum" SHRUBS and GROUND COVER Agave sp. Aloe sp. Bougainvillea sp. Carissa m. 'Green Carpet' Lavandula stoechas 'Larkman Hazel' Rosmarinus p. 'Huntington Carpet' Chamaerops humilis Xylosma congestum 'Compact' Anigozanthos Carex divulsa Nassella pulchra Muhlenbergia rigens Kalanchoe thyrsiflora Delosperma cooperi Callistemon citrinus 'Little John' Dasylirion longissimum Westringia sp. Iris sp. Dianella revoluta 'Little Rev' Yucca gloriosa Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low WUCOLS (R3) Japanese Privet Agave Aloe Bougainvillea Dwarf Natal Plum Hazel™ Spanish Lavender Groundcover Rosemary Mediterranean Fan Palm Compact Xylosma Kangaroo Paw Berkeley Sedges Purple Needlegrass Deer Grass Flapjack Paddle Plant Trailing Ice Plant Dwarf Bottlebrush Mexican Grass Tree Westringia Iris Little Rev™ Flax Lily Spanish Dagger WUCOLS (R3) Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement. Public storm drain utility easement. No trees allowed within easement.10ft min.Min. 10ft clearance required between STOP bar and property wall. No landscaping shall exceed 24'' in height within this zone . STOPSTOP STOPSTOP2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) 3B 3B #1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C' PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT PRIVATE ALLEY GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 VIEW TRIANGLE PER STD. 115-B PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PARCEL "C" PARCEL "A" Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work P E P P E R T R E E D R I V E OTHER COMMON OPEN SPACE [Builder installed, HOA maintained] Takeoff: 5,276 sf USABLE COMMON OPEN SPACE [Builder installed, HOA maintained; 10 ft min. dimension] Takeoff: 4,215 sf PRIVATE OPEN SPACE [Builder installed, homeowner maintained] [Min. 200 sq. ft. area with min. 10ft dim.] Takeoff: 2,194 sf UNCOUNTED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE [Builder installed, homeowner maintained] [Under 200 sq. ft. in area with less than 10ft. min. dimesnion] Takeoff: 266 sf Schematic Open Space Plan L-4 1442 Dale Avenue - Anaheim, CA Bonanni Development Project No.: BD04 Date: March 31, 2022 4th City Submittal 8'0 16'32' Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0'' OPEN SPACE (HSSP III-20): Required: 6,300 S.F. (350 S.F. total per unit) (Common = 10ft min. dimension, shall not include required street or landscape setbacks) Provided: (Includes usable common open space and private open space) TOTAL: 6,409 S.F.15'-8"17'-6"14'-6"10'-7"9'-4"15'-7"15'-7"13'-9"13'-8"20'-7"20'-8"10 ft. min.10 ft. min.10 ft. min.10 ft. min.10 ft. min.208 S.F.208 S.F.200 S.F.200 S.F.311 S.F.311 S.F. 208 S.F.248 S.F.311 S.F. 146 S.F.120 S.F.12'13'-9"10'-7"11'-10"11'-10"10'-4"10'-4"16'-10"16'-10"10ft min. patio dimension, per City requirements. 10ft min. patio dimension, per City requirements. STOPSTOP STOPSTOP2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) 3B 3B #1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C' PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT PRIVATE ALLEY GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 VIEW TRIANGLE PER STD. 115-B PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PARCEL "C" PARCEL "A" Limit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of WorkLimit of Work Limit of WorkLimit of Work P E P P E R T R E E D R I V E T T SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY FX Luminaire FB Fits well into tight spaces. Order code: FB, Aluminum Alloy, (BZ) Bronze Metallic, Adjustable Lamp: FB-3LED, 4.5W, 2700K, Beamspread: Spot Accessories: (GM-SS) Gutter Mount w 1/2" thread for Accent Lights 2 SVE-3 - Pole Light Area Pole Light, HID - Direct Lighting Sales, Model San Vicente #SVE-3 Cast Aluminum, Textured Bronze, RA21 Radius Lamp: Per Elec. Eng., Per Elec. Eng., Per Elec. Eng. Accessories: On DBC-1 Base & 10` round pole. 5 PX - 300 - TPC - BZ Low-voltage transformer - FX luminair. model #PX - 300 - TPC - BZ. Cast Aluminum, Metallic Bronze., Wall, Install with Mechanical Transformer Timer (#15557BK & P 300W 2 FX Luminaire PM Modern path light with powder-coated finish. 2.5" Dia x 14.0" H. PM-XT for Extra Tall 18.5". Order code: PM, Aluminum Alloy, (FB) Flat Black, Deck Mount for PM Lamp: PM-1LED, 2W 2.4VA, 2700K, Beamspread: Very Wide Flood 2 T LIGHTING SCHEDULE Schematic Lighting Plan L-5 1442 Dale Avenue - Anaheim, CA Bonanni Development Project No.: BD04 Date: March 31, 2022 4th City Submittal 8'0 16'32' Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0'' SITE PLAN SUMMARY See Sheet CS2 for more information Total Site Area: 0.929 Acres 40,458 S.F. Total Units: 18 Dwelling Units 2-Bedroom Units 7 Units (38.9%) Unit 2A 4 Units* Unit 2B 3 Units 3-Bedroom Units 11 Units (61.1%) Unit 3B 11 Units *2 Units are accessible (See Sheet CS2 for Affordable Unit Calculations) Density: Allowed: (per RM-3 Zoning) 16 DU 1 du/2,400 S.F. = 16.8 du Allowed with Bonus: 18 DU (5% bonus for 10% affordable, 16.8 DU + 5% = 17.64 DU, round up per AMC 18.52.040) Provided: 18 DU Parking: Required*: 36 Spaces 2-Bed = 2 Space/Unit 3-Bed = 2 Space/Unit Guest = None Required *(AMC 18.52.100, By-Right Reduction) Provided: 41 Spaces Garage: 36 Spaces Open (off-street): 5 Spaces Required Accessible = 1 Space Unassigned Open (5 x 5%) Open Space (AMC 18.06.100): Open Space Required: 6,300 S.F. Open Space Provided: 6,409 S.F. Site Coverage (AMC 18.06.080): Maximum Allowed: 45.0% Provided Site Coverage: 43.3% (17,530 S.F. Total Coverage / 40,458 S.F. Site) Required Setbacks (AMC 18.06.090/18.40.040/18.52.090): Structural Setback (Private Street) 15 feet Structural Setback (Interior*) 10 feet* Structural Setback (Freeway) 10 feet *Setback Reduction per 18.52.090, Table 52-G Legend Adaptable Unit Per CBC 1102A.3 (2 Units Total) Affordable Unit Locations (2 Units Total) 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'10'-0" 2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 5'-0"15'-0"10 ' - 0 "10'-0"10'-0" 10'-0"5'-0"24'-0" 25'-0" 28'-6" 3B 3B 26'-0"24'-0"#1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C'1'-0"1'-0"10'-0"10'-0"1 0 ' - 0 " 10'-0"28'-0"34'-6"8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 9'-0" 8'-0" 9'-0"18'-0"2'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0"8'-0"3'-3"3'-11"LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENTPRIVATE ALLEY TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED STOP SIGN EXISTING STOP SIGN PROPOSED STOP SIGN PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO EXISTING SIDEWALK LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'10'-0" 2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 5'-0"15'-0"1 0 ' - 0 "10'-0"10'-0" 10'-0"5'-0"24'-0" 25'-0" 28'-6" 3B 3B 26'-0"24'-0"#1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C'1'-0"1'-0"10'-0"10'-0"1 0 ' - 0 " 10'-0"28'-0"34'-6"8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6" 9'-0" 8'-0" 9'-0"18'-0"2'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0"8'-0"3'-3"3'-11"LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENTPRIVATE ALLEY TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED STOP SIGN EXISTING STOP SIGN PROPOSED STOP SIGN PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO EXISTING SIDEWALK LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'10'-0" 2B 2B 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 5'-0"15'-0"10 ' - 0 "10'-0"10'-0" 10'-0"5'-0"24'-0" 25'-0" 28'-6" 3B 3B 26'-0"24'-0"#1 TYPE 'A' #2 TYPE 'B' #3 TYPE 'C'1'-0"1'-0"10'-0"10'-0"1 0 ' - 0 " 10'-0"28'-0"34'-6"8'-6"8'-6"8'-6"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"18'-0"2'-0" 10'-0" 30'-0"8'-0"3'-3"3'-11"LANDSCAPE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY PRIVATE DRIVE SETBACK (AMC 18.06.090) 2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITH AFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306) FREEWAY SETBACK (AMC 18.40.040) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 40" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802)2-STORY INTERIOR SETBACK WITHAFFORDABLE REDUCTION (AMC 18.52.0306)UTILITY EASEMENT PEPPERTREE LANE (PRIVATE DRIVE)VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENTPRIVATE ALLEY TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER GARAGE OFFSET PER STD. 481 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE SETBACK PROPOSED STOP SIGN EXISTING STOP SIGN PROPOSED STOP SIGN PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO EXISTING SIDEWALK LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN LINE OF SIGHT FROM PROPOSED STOP SIGN A1.10 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN CONCEPTUAL RENDERINGS VIEW B - PEPPERTREE LN VIEW A - DRIVE ENTRY B A1.11 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA KEYPLAN A FIRE ACCESS PLAN N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' A1.20 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION 107' HOSE PULL 145' HOSE PULL 137' HOSE PULL149' HOSE PULL132' HOSE PULL137' HOSE PULL 20' -0 " R1 7 ' - 6 " EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION FIRE LANE EXISTING FIRE LANE EXISTING FIRE LANE24'-0"24'-0"R17'-6" H.H.R17'-6 " H .H . PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION 5'-0"40'-0" HAMMERHEAD 28'-0" HAMMERHEAD 28'-0" HAMMERHEAD28'-0"HAMMERHEAD40'-0"HAMMERHEAD40'-0"HAMMERHEADLEGEND HOSE PULL FIRE LANE / STAGING AREA HAMMERHEAD PER ANAHIEM FD "SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS" CODE NOTESFIRE SPRINKLERSALL BUILDING AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH ANFPA 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2019 CBC 903.3.1.3AND 903.2.18.CBC SECTION 302 - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS OCCUPANCY GROUP DESCRIPTION R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) DWELLING UNITS U PRIVATE GARAGES CBC SECTIONS 504.3 AND 504.4 - ALLOWABLE HEIGHTS TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION, NFPA 13D SPRINKLER OCCUPANCY GROUP R-3 U MAX HEIGHT 40 FT 60 FT MAX STORIES 2 2 PROPOSED HEIGHT 25 FT 10 FT PROPOSED STORIES 2 1 ALLOWABLE AREA (PER STORY) UNLIMITED 16,500 S.F. (TABLE 506.2) ALLOW AREA (PER BLDG) UNLIMITED 33,000 S.F. (EQN. 5-3) CBC SECTIONS 508.2.4 AND 508.4- OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS OCCUPANCY GROUPS DESCRIPTION R-3/R-3 1-HOUR DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION R-2/U 1-HOUR CBC SECTION 601 - FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION BUILDING ELEMENT TYPE VB (R-3/U) PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME 0-HOUR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR 0-HOUR EXTERIOR 0-HOUR NON-BEARING WALLS INTERIOR 0-HOUR EXTERIOR 0-HOUR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 0-HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION 0-HOUR CBC SECTION 602 - RATING FOR EXTERIOR WALLS FIRE SEPARATION DIST RATING (R-3/U, TYPE VB) X < 3 FT 1 HOUR 5 < X FT 0 HOUR (NOTE i) CBC SECTION 705 - ALLOWABLE OPENINGS FIRE SEPARATION DIST ALLOWABLE AREA 0 TO < 3 FT NOT PERMITTED (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) 3 TO < 5 FT 25% (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) (NOTE d) 5 OR GREATER NO LIMIT (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) (NOTE f) 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION 107' HOSE PULL 145' HOSE PULL 137' HOSE PULL149' HOSE PULL132' HOSE PULL137' HOSE PULL 20' -0 " R1 7 ' - 6 " EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION FIRE LANE EXISTING FIRE LANE EXISTING FIRE LANE24'-0"24'-0"R17'-6" H.H.R17'-6 " H .H . PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION 5'-0"40'-0" HAMMERHEAD 28'-0" HAMMERHEAD 28'-0" HAMMERHEAD28'-0"HAMMERHEAD40'-0"HAMMERHEAD40'-0"HAMMERHEADLEGEND HOSE PULL FIRE LANE / STAGING AREA HAMMERHEAD PER ANAHIEM FD "SPECIFICATIONS & REQUIREMENTS" CODE NOTES FIRE SPRINKLERS ALL BUILDING AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH A NFPA 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2019 CBC 903.3.1.3 AND 903.2.18. CBC SECTION 302 - OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS OCCUPANCY GROUP DESCRIPTION R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) DWELLING UNITS U PRIVATE GARAGES CBC SECTIONS 504.3 AND 504.4 - ALLOWABLE HEIGHTS TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION, NFPA 13D SPRINKLER OCCUPANCY GROUP R-3 U MAX HEIGHT 40 FT 60 FT MAX STORIES 2 2 PROPOSED HEIGHT 25 FT 10 FT PROPOSED STORIES 2 1 ALLOWABLE AREA (PER STORY) UNLIMITED 16,500 S.F. (TABLE 506.2) ALLOW AREA (PER BLDG) UNLIMITED 33,000 S.F. (EQN. 5-3) CBC SECTIONS 508.2.4 AND 508.4- OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS OCCUPANCY GROUPS DESCRIPTION R-3/R-3 1-HOUR DWELLING UNIT SEPARATION R-2/U 1-HOUR CBC SECTION 601 - FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION BUILDING ELEMENT TYPE VB (R-3/U) PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME 0-HOUR BEARING WALLS INTERIOR 0-HOUR EXTERIOR 0-HOUR NON-BEARING WALLS INTERIOR 0-HOUR EXTERIOR 0-HOUR FLOOR CONSTRUCTION 0-HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION 0-HOUR CBC SECTION 602 - RATING FOR EXTERIOR WALLS FIRE SEPARATION DIST RATING (R-3/U, TYPE VB) X < 3 FT 1 HOUR 5 < X FT 0 HOUR (NOTE i) CBC SECTION 705 - ALLOWABLE OPENINGS FIRE SEPARATION DIST ALLOWABLE AREA 0 TO < 3 FT NOT PERMITTED (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) 3 TO < 5 FT 25% (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) (NOTE d) 5 OR GREATER NO LIMIT (UNPROTCTD, SPINKLER) (NOTE f) REFUSE PICKUP AND STAGING N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' TRASH NOTES Bulk Item Staging: Per Anaheim Public Works, Residents will be allowed to place bulky items out for collection next to their regular carts on service day LEGEND 96 Gallon Refuse Car t Staging Location 96 Gallon Refuse Car t Storage Location A1.21 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'TRASH TURN-AROUND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 161718 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 161718 15 7 15 14 8 13 12 25'-0"29'-0"20'-0"25'-0"25'-6"24'-0"R 3 7 ' - 0 " TURNING RADIUS PER STD. 416 205.01'130.00'60.00'175.00'45.00'90.00'27.00'27.00'44.07'TRASH TURN-AROUND12345678 910111213141617181234569101116171815715148131225'-0"29'-0"20'-0"25'-0"25'-6"24'-0"R37'-0"TURNING RADIUSPER STD. 416 BUILDING TYPE A Total Units 8 Units Unit 2B (2-Bed, 1,045 s.f.) 2 Units Unit 3B (3-Bed, 1,560 s.f.) 6 Units Keynotes 1. Potential Photovoltaic Panel Layout. (Assumes 7 Panels per 2-Bedroom Unit, 8 Panels per 3-Bedroom Unit, 350 watt per panel, per CEC Equation 150.1-C) 2. Patio Wall per Landscape 3. Mechanical Condenser Unit at Grade 2B2B 3B3B3B3B3B3B 2B2B3B3B3B3B3B3B UTILITIESUTILITIES173'-2"61'-3"168'-7"61'-3"2 3 3 1'-0"PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT, 30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC 18.06.090.0802) A2.10 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' BUILDING TYPE A I BUILDING PLANS LEVEL 1 KEYPLAN LEVEL 2 Keynotes 1. Potential Photovoltaic Panel Layout. (Assumes 7 Panels per 2-Bedroom Unit, 8 Panels per 3-Bedroom Unit, 350 watt per panel, per CEC Equation 150.1-C) 2. Patio Wall per Landscape 3. Mechanical Condenser Unit at Grade A2.11 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA BUILDING TYPE A 1'-6" TYP.RAKE1'-6" TYP. EAVE 168'-7" 1 N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' BUILDING TYPE A I BUILDING PLANS ROOF PLAN KEYPLAN 2B2B3B3B3B3B3B3B A2.12 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA BUILDING TYPE A I ELEVATIONS FRONT RIGHT LEFT REAR EXTERIOR FINISHES 1. Asphalt Shingle Roof 2. Board and Batten Siding, Smooth 3. Exterior Cement Plaster Finish 4. Fibercement Trim 5. Exterior Cement Plaster Trim 6. Vinyl Window N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' 11 1 1 22 44 33 3 3 55 5 5 66 6 6 KEYPLAN N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' 1'-6" TYP. EAVE 1'-6" TYP. RAKE 2A 2A 2A 2A 2B 2A 2A 2A 2A 2B UTILITIES107'-8"40'-0"105'-4"40'-0" 1 3 1'-0"PROJECTION ABOVE, 12" ENCROACHMENT,30" ENCROACHMENT ALLOWED (AMC18.06.090.0802)LEVEL 1LEVEL 2ROOF PLAN BUILDING TYPE B Total Units 5 Units Unit 2A (2-Bed, 1,155 s.f.) 4 Units Unit 2B (2-Bed, 1,045 s.f.) 1 Units Keynotes 1. Potential Photovoltaic Panel Layout. (Assumes 7 Panels per 2-Bedroom Unit, 8 Panels per 3-Bedroom Unit, 350 watt per panel, per CEC Equation 150.1-C) 2. Patio Wall per Landscape 3. Mechanical Condenser Unit at Grade A2.20 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA BUILDING TYPE B I BUILDING PLANS KEYPLAN BUILDING TYPE B I ELEVATIONS FRONT RIGHT LEFT REAR N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' 2A2A2A2A2B 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 A2.21 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA EXTERIOR FINISHES 1. Asphalt Shingle Roof 2. Board and Batten Siding, Smooth 3. Exterior Cement Plaster Finish 4. Fibercement Trim 5. Exterior Cement Plaster Trim 6. Vinyl Window KEYPLAN N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' BUILDING TYPE C Total Units 5 Units Unit 3B (3-Bed, 1,560 s.f.) 5 Units3'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" WHA-64 WHA-64-TITLE-3 WHA-64-TITLE-2 WHA-64-TITLE-1 X 1 AAD2.2 1 AAD2.2 3B3B 3B3B3B 3B3B 3B3B3B 107'-8"60'-0"UTILITIES2 105'-4"57'-0"3 KEYPLAN Keynotes 1. Potential Photovoltaic Panel Layout. (Assumes 7 Panels per 2-Bedroom Unit, 8 Panels per 3-Bedroom Unit, 350 watt per panel, per CEC Equation 150.1-C) 2. Patio Wall per Landscape 3. Mechanical Condenser Unit at Grade A2.30 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA BUILDING TYPE C I BUILDING PLANS KEYPLAN LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' BUILDING TYPE C 1'-6" TYP.RAKE1'-6" TYP.EAVE1 105'-4" KEYPLAN Keynotes 1. Potential Photovoltaic Panel Layout. (Assumes 7 Panels per 2-Bedroom Unit, 8 Panels per 3-Bedroom Unit, 350 watt per panel, per CEC Equation 150.1-C) 2. Patio Wall per Landscape 3. Mechanical Condenser Unit at Grade A2.31 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA BUILDING TYPE C I BUILDING PLANS KEYPLAN ROOF PLAN BUILDING TYPE C I ELEVATIONS FRONT RIGHT LEFT REAR N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' 3B3B3B3B3B 11 1 1 2 433 3 3 55 5 5 66 6 6 A2.32 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA EXTERIOR FINISHES 1. Asphalt Shingle Roof 2. Board and Batten Siding, Smooth 3. Exterior Cement Plaster Finish 4. Fibercement Trim 5. Exterior Cement Plaster Trim 6. Vinyl Window KEYPLAN 40'-0"21'-0" 10'-10"11'-812"W/D BED 2 BATH 26'-812"GARAGE 40'-0"21'-0"6'-012"3'-10"4'-8"7'-21 2"12'-11"12'-1"7'-412"BED 1 BATH 1 W.I.C. KITCHEN PWDR LIVING 3'-11 2"9'-6"4'-0"3'-012"3'-8"3'-912"12'-312"16'-11" 12'-11" x 12'-0" 16'-7" x 13'-9" 10'-6" x 11'-2" WINDOW AT END UNITS 17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGE 40'-0"21'-0"10'-10"11'-812"W/DBED 2BATH 26'-812"GARAGE40'-0"21'-0"6'-012"3'-10" 4'-8"7'-212"12'-11"12'-1"7'-412"BED 1BATH 1W.I.C.KITCHENPWDRLIVING3'-112"9'-6"4'-0"3'-012"3'-8"3'-912"12'-312"16'-11"12'-11" x 12'-0"16'-7" x 13'-9"10'-6" x 11'-2"WINDOW ATEND UNITS17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGEN 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' Legend Overhead Storage Rack, 100 Cu. Ft. Min. per AMC 18.06.100.030 ((2) 4’x8’x2’ 64 cuft) Racks Proposed at Each Unit, Min Headheight clearance 7’ from Finish Floor) A3.11 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA UNIT 2A I UNIT PLANS UNIT 2A 2 Bedrooms + 2.5 Bath Adaptable Unit Unit Floor Area 1,155 S.F. Level 1 385 S.F. Level 2 770 S.F. LEVEL 2LEVEL 2 (END UNIT) LEVEL 1 40'-0"21'-0"10'-10"11'-812"W/DBED 2BATH 26'-812"GARAGE40'-0"21'-0"6'-012"3'-10" 4'-8"7'-212"12'-11"12'-1"7'-412"BED 1BATH 1W.I.C.KITCHENPWDRLIVING3'-112"9'-6"4'-0"3'-012"3'-8"3'-912"12'-312"16'-11"12'-11" x 12'-0"16'-7" x 13'-9"10'-6" x 11'-2"WINDOW ATEND UNITS17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGELegend Overhead Storage Rack, 100 Cu. Ft. Min. per AMC 18.06.100.030 ((2) 4’x8’x2’ 64 cuft) Racks Proposed at Each Unit, Min Headheight clearance 7’ from Finish Floor) A3.12 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA37'-6"21'-0"37'-6"21'-0"4'-6"3'-6"2'-9"3'-6"6'-8"12'-11"10'-5"6'-912"16'-71 2"10'-3"5'-212"10'-61 2" 12'-10"3'-6"GARAGE BED 2 BATH 2 W/DWIC KITCHEN LIVING BATH 1 BED 1 PWDR 13'-2" 5'-8"3'-0"4'-2"9'-0"3'-6"6'-0"10'-8"11'-1"5'-11 2" 16'-7" x 12'-0" 12'-11" x 10'-5" 10'-6" x 10'-3" WINDOW AT END UNITS18'-9"17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGE N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' UNIT 2B I UNIT PLANS UNIT 2B 2 Bedrooms + 2.5 Bath Unit Floor Area 1,045 S.F. Level 1 330 S.F. Level 2 715 S.F. LEVEL 2LEVEL 2 (END UNIT) LEVEL 1 40'-0"21'-0"10'-10"11'-812"W/DBED 2BATH 26'-812"GARAGE40'-0"21'-0"6'-012"3'-10" 4'-8"7'-212"12'-11"12'-1"7'-412"BED 1BATH 1W.I.C.KITCHENPWDRLIVING3'-112"9'-6"4'-0"3'-012"3'-8"3'-912"12'-312"16'-11"12'-11" x 12'-0"16'-7" x 13'-9"10'-6" x 11'-2"WINDOW ATEND UNITS17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGELegend Overhead Storage Rack, 100 Cu. Ft. Min. per AMC 18.06.100.030 ((2) 4’x8’x2’ 64 cuft) Racks Proposed at Each Unit, Min Headheight clearance 7’ from Finish Floor) A3.13 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA UNIT 3B 3 Bedrooms + 2.5 Bath + Den Unit Floor Area 1,560 S.F. Level 1 590 S.F. Level 2 970 S.F. Private Open Space Varies* *See Landscape Plans for Patio Info 51'-6"21'-0"25'-1"13'-1112"KITCHEN DINING PWDR LIVING 10'-81 2"10'-0"13'-4"11'-9"14'-8" 4'-6"3'-6"10'-5"3'-4"7'-612"5'-0"5'-51 2" GARAGE 21'-0"48'-6"13'-912"14'-01 2"11'-11"9'-312"10'-1012"BED 1 BATH 1 WIC BED 2 BED 3 BATH 2 DEN 6'-61 2" 6'-4" 11'-91 2"9'-412"10'-5"10'-7"3'-0"5'-7"3'-10"4'-0" 6'-0" 3'-41 2" LINEN STOR W/D 4'-0"10'-5" x 13'-8" WINDOW AT END UNITS WINDOW AT END UNITS 14'-8" x 11'-9" 13'-9" x 13'-4" 11'-9" x 9'-4" 10'-1" x 10'-5"10'-0" x 10'-5" 17'-0"18'-0"OVERHEAD STORAGE OVERHEAD STORAGE N 0'20'40'60'80' SCALE: 1" = 20' 0'16'32'48'64' SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 0'8'16'24'32' SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0'4'8'12'16' SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0'30'60'90'120' SCALE: 1" = 30' 0'40'80'120'160' SCALE: 1" = 40' 0'10'20'30'40' SCALE: 1" = 10' 0'5'10'15'20' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0'4' SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 8'12'16' UNIT 3B I UNIT PLANS LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 Vinyl Windows White Board and Batten Siding (Smooth) Fiber Cement Paint: Per Elevations Asphalt Shingle Roof Color: Moire Black Garage Door: BrownTrim 1 Paint SW 9154 (Perle Noir) Trim 2 Paint SW 6540 (Starry Night) Field 1 Paint SW 7005 (Pure White) Field 2 Paint SW 6277 (Special Gray) Accent 1 Paint SW 7603 (Poolhouse) Accent 2 Paint SW 6192 (Coastal Plain) A3.14 SECOND CITY SUBMITTALWHA I 3767 WORSHAM AVENUE I LONG BEACH, CA 90808 I 949.250.0607 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. 2021213.00 | 04-01-2022 1442 N DALE AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA FROM STAFF 1 OF 1ATTACHMENT NO. 8 1442 N DALE AVENUE PLANNING COMMISION – JULY 6, 2022 @ 5:00pm APPLICANT PRESENTATION COMMUNITY OUTREACH •SEPTEMBER 7, 2022: Onsite meeting with Meridith Gill, HOA Board Members, and 1-2 Residence •OCTOBER 6, 2022: Conference Call with Tary Loomis (Attorney for Parkdale HOA) •NOVEMBER 3, 2022: Attended Parkdale Monthly HOA Meeting @ 7:00pm •JANUARY 20, 2022: Zoom Meeting with City of Anaheim Staff, Meridtih Gill and HOA Board Members •JANUARY 21, 2022: Walden & Associates sent the Utility Plan to Meridith Gill via email •JANUARY 25, 2022: Email communication from Meridith Gill stating ”I will let you know when the next board meeting is and if there are any questions.” •FEBRUARY 24, 2022: Email communication from Meridith Gill stating ”I meet with the HOA Board next Wednesday. I will follow-up with any questions/concerns they may have further.” •JANUARY 11, 2022 –APRIL 11, 2022: Meridith Gill was included on the email stream with the City of Buena Park regarding Sewer & Water •MAY 23, 2022: Email sent to Meridith Gill alerting her that the Planning Commission date was scheduled for June 6TH @ 5:00PM •JUNE 29, 2022 Zoom meeting with the Parkdale Community @ 6:00pm PARKING REQUIRMENTS -CC&Rs •Each Unit is assigned an attached two car side-by-side garage. There are no additional parking spaces in the Project for Occupants;therefore, all vehicles owned or operated by a resident of a Unit shall be parked in the garage associated with that Unit. Garage space shallnot be converted into any use (such as a recreational room or storage room) that would prevent its use as parking for the number ofvehicles the space was designed to contain. •There are a total of 5 guest parking spaces in the Project. Guest parking spaces are intended for use by guests of Occupants only; may not tobe used by the Occupants; and may not be used for long-term (more than 48-hours) or routine basis by guests. Movement of a vehicle fromone guest parking space to another shall not constitute a break in the 48-hour restriction. •All owners will be required to sign a disclosure (or CC&Rs) that specifies that only the parking of vehicles will be permitted in the designatedparking areas and garages. •The HOA management will be responsible for enforcement for quarterly inspections to ensure that no personal items are being stored inthe garage parking spaces. •Prohibited Vehicles. The following vehicles are prohibited within the Property: recreational vehicles (e.g. motorhomes, travel trailers,camper vans, boats, etc.), commercial-type vehicles (e.g., stakebed trucks, tank trucks, dump trucks, step vans, concrete trucks, etc.), busesor vans designed to accommodate more than ten (10) people, vehicles having more than two (2) axles, trailers, inoperable vehicles or partsof vehicles, aircraft, other similar vehicles or any vehicle or vehicular equipment deemed a nuisance by the Board (collectively, "ProhibitedVehicles"). •All applicable provisions of the California Vehicle Code will be enforced on any private streets on the Property in accordance with CaliforniaVehicle Code Section 22658 (or any successor statute regarding removal of parked cars and required warning signs). The Associ ation mayestablish "Parking" and "No Parking" areas within the Common Area, in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 22658 (orsuccessor statute). •The Association has the right and obligation to enforce all parking restrictions and to remove any violating vehicles in accordance with theCalifornia Vehicle Code, or other applicable laws. EASEMENT LEGAL RIGHTS SEWER –EXISTING SEWER LATERAL PERIMETER BLOCK WALL STOP SIGNS PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS •CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN ZONING AT 18DU/AC (SAME AS SURROUNDING COMMUNITY). •EXCEEDS REQUIRED PARKING BY 5 SPACES. •PARKING MANAGEMENT REGULATED BY CC&Rs & HOA. •EXTENSIVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH •PROVIDE ADDITIONAL NEW HOUSING FOR ANAHEIM RESIDENTS. •10% OF PROJECT AFFORDABLE UNITS. •DESIGNED TO BE COMPATABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY (ZONING, 2 – STORY, ENHANCED LANDSCAPING, NEW WALLS). FROM KELLY BROGDON 1 Nicholas J. Taylor From:Greg Bird Sent:Sunday, June 5, 2022 10:53 PM To:Nicholas J. Taylor Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: 1442 Dale Ave Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you  recognize the sender and are expecting the message.        Hello,    I am a resident of Parkdale HOA in Anaheim. I have read your documents and I take extreme issue with your calculation  for parking. Parking is already an issue in our Association and many residents must already park 2 tenths of a mile from  their homes. This is difficult for older residents. Already, a significant number of people in the complex park on Dale to  the point where Dale is full up to Boiseranc park on most nights.    Your planning says that this development contains 5 more parking slots than required (41 spots with 36 being in two car  garages.) Of those 5 spots one is EV charging, limiting that spot and the other is labeled for Handicapped. There are only  3 real open spaces beyond garages for 18 families!    A cursory search of data for the US Department of Energy shows that 25% of people with 2 car garages don’t park even a  single car in them and 33% only park 1 car in them. The National average for each family is 2 cars. So while your  calculations of needing 36 parking spots is correct, your calculations of how many spots are provided and the impact it  will have on the community is vastly underrepresented.    25% of 18 is 4.5, so 4 units will likely not park a single car in their garage. 33% of 18 is 6, so 6 units will likely park only  one car in the garage. That means of those 36 garage spaces, based on known usage patterns a cross the US, 14 cars will  now need a parking spot. Most likely 3‐4 of them will park in the outside spaces provided but maybe 5 if one of them  happens to have a placard. This doesn’t account for these 18 families ever having guests or visitors.    Here’s the crux of the issue. The area, already impacted parking‐wise, now must find a way to support 9‐11 more  vehicles! And that is just on a normal day. On the weekend, when people are most likely to have guests visit, the parking  will be even worse. This will force Parkdale HOA to implement parking permits or other measures for its parking issues.  Parkdale will likely need to increase towing to enforce these new permits. The animosity between associations will grow  and who knows where this all leads.    This project is ill conceived and requires more consideration for parking. I recommend a new plan be drawn up to either  increase the number of parking spots in the new association, to account for these additional 9 vehicles, or decrease the  number of units to a more reasonable level for parking.    Sincerely,  Greg Bird      Anaheim, CA 92801  2 I implore you to ensure that this does not happen.    Also at issue are the following:  1. Parking will be an issue because the new owners may or may not use the designated garages, may  have more than two cars per condo, or may have multiple visitors necessitating more parking. At  Parkdale we will have to issue parking permits to ensure new owners will not park on the Parkdale  property. Additionally, this may cause parking issues on Dale and the flower tract housing nearby.  2. Safe entrance and exit into new condos from Peppertree drive. Currently there are no stop signs in this  area and there will have to appropriate stop signs for merging into any traffic from the new entry way  onto Peppertree.  3. Please ensure that new utilities are created for the new development that DOES NOT TIE INTO THE  CURRENT PARKDALE SUPPLY.  I will be attending the Anaheim meeting on June 6, 2022 but wanted to ensure that you had access to these  major concerns prior to the meeting. I am hoping that you will be able to review and respond to this email.      Thank you in advance for your consideration.        Christina Russo    Anaheim , Ca., 92801  2 use veficles (file, police, paramedics). Also the alley is where A/C units get installed on to the roof top via crane as well as  deliveries for wash/dryers, freezers etc.   The aforfementioned was liely not considered when the easement was put into place and I continue to implore the City  Council and the builder to not use the alley way as an access point for all of the above reasons.    The residents of Parkdale including myself ar worriend about the following:    1. Use of Parkdale existing utilities electric and Buena Park water. It would be great to have the new development  have its own water and electricity lines for a multitude of reasons  such as wear nd tear and financial responsi  bilirt for repair and to ensur eeach property is charged correctly.  .      2.   Issue with refuse pick‐up at the new location and lenksuring that the new units will be charged accordingly  3. Environmental impact study with respect to noise (measured in decibels) and density of this number of units in a  space that is less than 1 acre and multiple more vehicles adding to the smog and air quality in the area. Has  there been a noise study to include the noise decibels emanating from the freeway, new a/c units for the condo,  and the condo units. Please advise if you can.  4. Cap the current well and receive documented paperwork that  this has been completed prfoperly from an  environmental perspective.  5. Remove properly the septic tank that is currently in place  without leaving sewage in the area – documenttation  that the builder has accomplished this safely and satisfactorily would be great.           Although I initially wanted an 8 foot brick fence surrounding the community and especially in the Peppertree alley it  seems reasonable now to agree that 6 foot concrete as a division for the new community would be satisfactory (along  with the 4 way stop) that was already agreed to on Peppertree drive.    Please forward to the City Council members for review including the pictures of the alley in the back.  Thank you again  for all of your assistance and support to ensure Parkdale residents have their concerns heard and hopefully supported.      FIRST EMAIL PREVIOUSLY SENT TO YOU  Hello Mr. Taylor,    I am emailing about the 1442 N. Dale project for 18 new condos. There are some concerns with this  construction however there is one that is the most salient and   critical.    I reside at  which is the townhouse and garage closest to the entry of the current fence  (rear) which is directly next to the fence that can currently open. Hence, I am concerned with the Peppertree  alley where eight townhomes are along the alley way. I have seen the plans and I am aware that they can  change. Currently there is no access  for the cndos to exit via the Peppertree alley by vehicle and I hope this  will not change and there will be an 8 or 10 foot block wall along the new community. The residents whose  garages go through the Peppertree alley are quite concerned that there will be no access for the new condos  via the alley for the following reasons:  1. Alley is very narrow and when a resident backs out from the garage it takes about 90% of the way for a  subcompact car to exit the garage. There is no room for 2 way traffic. To allow the condos to enter and  exit this access via a car would likely lead to many many accidents. When backing out of a garage there  is no way to see anyone else coming or going until one is in the midst of the alley. Hence, exiting like  this is in terms of the Parkdale residents along this alley is blind and will lead to accidents. I am  attaching a picture of my car backing out so that you will see how narrow the alley is. Additionally  because of the location of the 5 freeway (behind Peppertree alley) many times a cars unfamiliar with  3 the area will drive down Dale street looking for the entrance to the freeway and will turn into and go  down the Peppertree alley looking for the freeway and will have to turn around and go back to Dale.  2. There is a fire zone (red curb) so that firemen can access the rear of the garages for all current  Peppertree homeowners. Currently in Parkdale all alley ways have the ability for fire access ensuring  safety for the community residents.   3. Another major issue to ensure that the new planned community will not have an approved car access  is for the delivery of items such as water heaters, washer and dryer, new air conditioners (goes onto  roof), and delivery of a jacuzzi to the backyard .  I have lived here for 30 years and   have needed to use  this alley for delivery of items by crane.  4. The alley width was primarily made this narrow as there were only eight townhomes and the  farmhouse residents to use this access. The alley way was not designed to support increased traffic  with 18 condos who may each have two to four vehicles per condo.  I implore you to ensure that this does not happen.    Also at issue are the following:  1. Environmental issues – Is there a documengted study for the environment inpact noise and desity with  this number of \ units in a less than 1 acre space. Parking will be an issue because the new owners may  or may not use the designated garages, may have more than two cars per condo, or may have multiple  visitors necessitating more parking. At Parkdale we will have to issue parking permits to ensure new  owners will not park on the Parkdale property. Additionally, this may cause parking issues on Dale and  the flower tract housing nearby.  2. Safe entrance and exit into new condos from Peppertree drive. Currently there are no stop signs in this  area and there will have to appropriate stop signs for merging into any traffic from the new entry way  onto Peppertree.  3. Please ensure that new utilities are created for the new development that DOES NOT TIE INTO THE  CURRENT PARKDALE SUPPLY.  I will be attending the Anaheim meeting on June 6, 2022 but wanted to ensure that you had access to these  major concerns prior to the meeting. I am hoping that you will be able to review and respond to this email.      Thank you in advance for your consideration.        Christina Russo    Anaheim , Ca., 92801  CP Sent from Mail for Windows    PARKDALE THOA OPPOSITION / REQUESTS FOR REVIEW 1442 DALE Historical Landmark The farm home at 1442 Dale was considered an historical property by Parkdale THOA and its residents as is has significant history for over 50 years with the City of Buena Park and Anaheim. Many residents purchased their homes in Parkdale thinking this home could not be demolished or developed on. It was believed to be protected by the City of Anaheim and the Buena Park Historical Society. The development of this property has an impact on the homeowners who purchased their properties with this belief. Air Quality and Traffic Noise Analysis Report Parkdale THOA homeowners in years prior have requested sound survives and air quality impact reports from CALTRANS as they live within 500 feet of two major freeways. Harmful levels of vehicle pollution effects are a concern for Parkdale THOA homeowners. California air quality regulators warn against building 500 or even 1,000 feet from a freeway. Traffic pollution is high, which brings concerns for asthma, cancer, heart attacks, strokes, reduced lung function, pre-term births and a growing list of other health problems. Parkdale THOA is requesting 1442 Dale obtain an air quality report and a noise analysis report prior to approval of building. Parkdale THOA is requiring reports obtained by 1442 Dale are shared with the homeowners of Parkdale THOA. Easement The easement was neglected by the owner of 1442 Dale. The owner has not contributed prior or currently to the maintenance, budgeting, and costs for the streets or utilities within this easement. A large portion of the easement has not been used by this property since 1975 and Parkdale considered it abandon by 1442 Dale. 1442 Dale used the alleyway on Pepper Tree Drive exclusively and only to access their property. The circumstances that existed at the time of the easement conveyance did not give the implication that future development(s) would create a burden upon Parkdale THOA. 1442 Dale has well water and a septic system. Parkdale has private sewer and water lines on this easement. Parkdale lines are older and at almost life expectancy that an upgrade could not accommodate. An over burden of these lines will cause a negative impact to Parkdale THOA. Utilities 1. Parkdale THOA requests the developer of 1442 Dale does NOT access Parkdale THOA private sewer lines and water lines. 2. Alternatively, Parkdale THOA requests written proof the new installation will not in any way impact Parkdale THOA. The burden of proof is to be provided by the developer from the City of Buena Park and Anaheim. 3. And, further, if 1442 is permitted to connect to Parkdale THOA utilities in the easement area, then 1442 will be required to upgrade all the utilities in order to guarantee that the use by 1442 will not in any way impact Parkdale THOA; and further, all costs got any improvements to any of the system, including but not limited to, said upgrades will be the sole responsibility of the developer. PARKING AND COMMON AREAS 1. Parkdale THOA requests the new property at 1442 Dale be a subassociation, Parkdale THOA to be the master associations. Dues payments would be required for the usage of parking, pool area, clubhouse, common area landscaping, and streets. 2. If a subassociation is not agreed upon, Parkdale THOA requests the new property at 1442 Dale record in their CC&Rs they are NOT a subassociation of Parkdale THOA and therefore all common areas and amenities are restricted for use at all times. Access to their public streets, parking, pool area, clubhouse, and common area landscaping are for the use of Parkdale THOA residents only. 3. Parkdale THOA requests the new property at 1442 Dale have written into their CC&Rs garages are exclusively for parking of vehicles only and required. 4. Parkdale THOA requests that it be made clear, that there to be no parking by 1442 Dale owners, residents, and guests (invitees). This is to be recorded/addendum added to the deed, as well as in the CC&Rs. The easement and private streets may not be parked upon and limited driving use only. 5. The above provisions, which are to be added to the CC&Rs, will not be subject to amendment.  1LFKRODV-7D\ORU )URP9HJD9LFWRU2 6HQW7KXUVGD\-XQH$0 7R1LFKRODV-7D\ORU 6XEMHFW5(>(;7(51$/@3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ3XEOLF+HDULQJ-XQH 'ŽŽĚŵŽƌŶŝŶŐEŝĐŬ  /ĂƉƉƌĞĐŝĂƚĞƚŚĞĐĂůů͕ƐŽƚŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĨŽƌƚŚĂƚ͘  /ǁŽƵůĚƐĂLJŵLJŽŶůLJĐŽŵŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŝƐƚŚĂƚ/ďĞůŝĞǀĞƚŚĞƌĞƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŵŽƌĞŐƵĞƐƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞ ŶĞǁĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘KƵƌŽǁŶĐŽŵƉůĞdžŚĂƐĂϮͲĐĂƌŐĂƌĂŐĞĂŶĚĂŐƵĞƐƚƐƉĂĐĞƉĞƌƵŶŝƚ͕ďƵƚďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞǁĂLJƚŚŝŶŐƐĂƌĞ ŶŽǁ͕ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶŽƵƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞŝƐƐƚŝůůŚĂƌĚƚŽĨŝŶĚĂƚƚŝŵĞƐ͘ƵĞƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐŝŶƌĞŶƚƐĂŶĚŵŽƌƚŐĂŐĞƐ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŵŽƌĞ ƉĞŽƉůĞůŝǀŝŶŐƉĞƌŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚǁŚŝĐŚŵĞĂŶƐŵŽƌĞĐĂƌƐƉĞƌŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ͘Ɛ/ŵĞŶƚŝŽŶĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŽŶĂůĞŝƐĂŶŽƉƚŝŽŶ ďƵƚǁŚĞŶƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĞǀĞŶƚƐĂƚŽŝƐƐĞƌĂŶĐWĂƌŬŽƌƚŚĞǁĞĞŬůLJƐƉŽƌƚůĞĂŐƵĞŐĂŵĞƐ͕ŝƚŐĞƚƐƌĞĂůůLJďĂĐŬĞĚƵƉ͘dŚŝƐƉĂƐƚ ĂƐƚĞƌ͕ƉŽůŝĐĞŚĂĚƚŽĐŽŵĞŽƵƚƚŽĐŽŶƚƌŽůƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶĂůĞďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞŚƵŶĚƌĞĚƐƚŚĂƚƐŚŽǁĞĚƵƉĨŽƌƚŚĞĨĞƐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͘ ,ĂǀŝŶŐŵŽƌĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƌŽǁŶĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁŽƵůĚŚĞůƉĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƚŚĞŝƌŽǁŶƐƚƌĞƐƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐůĞƐƐĂĨĨĞĐƚŝŶƚŚĞ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͘  dŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĨŽƌLJŽƵƌƚŝŵĞ͕  Victor Vega Sr. Procurement Buyer, DPA  91 FREEWAY W PAR K D A L E D R W PEPPER TREE DR N GREENHAVEN LNW PARLD A L E D R N WEEPING WILLOW LNW PEPPER TREE DR . ORANGETHORPE AVE S. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVE1442 North Dale Avenue DEV No. 2021-00188 Subject Property APN: 070-741-01 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 RM-3PARKDALE TOWNHOMES160 UNITSRM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS RM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS T SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-3PARKDALE TOWNHOMES160 UNITSRM-3PARKDALE TOWNHOMES160 UNITSRM-3PARKDALE TOWNHOMES160 UNITSRM-3 PARKDALE TOWNHOMES 160 UNITS . ORANGETHORPE AVE S. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVE144 2 No r t h D ale A ven u e D E V N o. 2 0 2 1 -0 0 1 8 8 Subject Property APN: 070-741-01 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Ph oto: May 20 21 T SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DEV2021-00188 From:Nathaniel Hyman To:Planning Commission Cc:Dylan Casey Subject:[EXTERNAL] 18-Unit Housing Development at 1442 North Dale Avenue Date:Friday, July 1, 2022 10:13:25 AM Attachments:1442 North Dale Avenue Planning Commission HAA Letter.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Attached is our letter informing the Anaheim Planning Commission of its obligations under the Housing Accountability Act with regard to the 18-unit Housing Development at 1442 North Dale Avenue. Thank you, Nathaniel Hyman July 1, 2022 City of Anaheim Planning Commission 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA, 92805 Re: 18-Unit Housing Development at 1442 North Dale Avenue Dear City of Anaheim Planning Commission The California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund (CaRLA)submits this letter to inform the Anaheim Planning Commission that they have an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the 1442 North Dale Avenue 18-Unit condominium project.The Housing Accountability Act (Gov.Code Section 65589.5)requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant projects, such as this one,unless findings can be made regarding specific,objective,written health and safety hazards.These impacts must be unmitigable,and must be established through a preponderance of evidence.As indicated in the StaReport prepared for the June 6th Planning Commission Meeting,the proposed development would comply with all of the city’s objective zoning and general plan standards,and no evidence of adverse health and safety impacts exists. As you are well aware,California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage.New housing such as this is a public benefit.It will bring increased tax revenue,new customers to local businesses,decarbonization in the face of the climate crisis,but most importantly,it will reduce the displacement of existing residents into homelessness or carbon-heavy car commutes.The laws cited in this letter are designed to allow and require cities to approve of new homes over the objection of a small minority of neighbors.Research indicates that the anti-housing voices frequent in public hearings are disproportionately white,higher-income,and homeowners.These voices do not represent the best interests of Anaheim or the1 broader community.Approving developments like this one over these vocal objections is a step towards racial,economic,environmental,and social justice.We urge Anaheim to approve of this project because it is the right decision for the City and is required by state law. 1 Einstein, Palmer, and Glick,Who Participates in Local Government? Evidence from Meeting Minutes,Perspectives on Politics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2019 https://www.dropbox.com/s/k4kzph3ynal3xai/ZoningParticipation_Perspectives_Final.pdf?d l=0 CaRLA is a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels,including low-income households.The proposed project will provide badly needed housing, support long-term economic stability,and encourage nearby commercial development.In addition,the proposed project will improve the streetscape and incorporate design elements that support residential use.While no one project will solve the regional housing crisis,the proposed 1442 North Dale Avenue development is the kind of housing Anaheim needs to mitigate displacement,provide shelter for its growing population,and arrest unsustainable housing price appreciation.You may learn more about CaRLA at www.carlaef.org. Sincerely, Dylan Casey Executive Director California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund - hi@carlaef.org 360 Grand Ave #323, Oakland, CA 94601 1442 N DALE AVENUE PLANNING COMMISION –JULY 6, 2022 @ 5:00pm COMMUNITY OUTREACH •SEPTEMBER 7, 2021: Onsite meeting with Meridith Gill, HOA Board Members, and 1-2 Residence •OCTOBER 6, 2021: Conference Call with Tary Loomis (Attorney for Parkdale HOA) •NOVEMBER 3, 2021: Attended Parkdale Monthly HOA Meeting @ 7:00pm •JANUARY 20, 2022: Zoom Meeting with City of Anaheim Staff, Meridtih Gill and HOA Board Members •JANUARY 21, 2022: Walden & Associates sent the Utility Plan to Meridith Gill via email •JANUARY 25, 2022: Email communication from Meridith Gill stating ”I will let you know when the next board meeting is and if there are any questions.” •FEBRUARY 24, 2022: Email communication from Meridith Gill stating ”I meet with the HOA Board next Wednesday. I will follow-up with any questions/concerns they may have further.” •JANUARY 11, 2022 –APRIL 11, 2022: Meridith Gill was included on the email stream with the City of Buena Park regarding Sewer & Water •MAY 23, 2022: Email sent to Meridith Gill alerting her that the Planning Commission date was scheduled for June 6TH @ 5:00PM •JUNE 29, 2022 Zoom meeting with the Parkdale Community @ 6:00pm June 29, 2022 –Zoom Meeting w/ Parkdale Community •Zoom meeting started at 6:00pm & ended around 7:00pm. •Roughly 12 people were on the call. Topics Discussed: •Parking -Added additional parking mitigation measures into the CC&Rs. •Block Wall -A block wall 8-feet or less is supported. Lean on the conversation and direction of Planning Commission. •Easement Maintenance Agreement -Committed to future discussions to find a reasonable and agreeable solution. PARKING REQUIRMENTS -CC&Rs •Each Unit is assigned an attached two car side-by-side garage. There are no additional parking spaces in the Project for Occupants; therefore, all vehicles owned or operated by a resident of a Unit shall be parked in the garage associated with that Unit. Garage space shall not be converted into any use (such as a recreational room or storage room) that would prevent its use as parking for the number of vehicles the space was designed to contain. •There are a total of 5 guest parking spaces in the Project. Guest parking spaces are intended for use by guests of Occupants only; may not to be used by the Occupants; and may not be used for long-term (more than 48-hours) or routine basis by guests. Movement of a vehicle from one guest parking space to another shall not constitute a break in the 48-hour restriction. •All owners will be required to sign a disclosure (or CC&Rs) that specifies that only the parking of vehicles will be permitted in the designated parking areas and garages. •The HOA management will be responsible for enforcement for quarterly inspections to ensure that no personal items are being stored in the garage parking spaces. •Prohibited Vehicles. The following vehicles are prohibited within the Property: recreational vehicles (e.g. motorhomes, travel trailers, camper vans, boats, etc.), commercial-type vehicles (e.g., stakebed trucks, tank trucks, dump trucks, step vans, concrete trucks, etc.), buses or vans designed to accommodate more than ten (10) people, vehicles having more than two (2) axles, trailers, inoperable vehicles or parts of vehicles, aircraft, other similar vehicles or any vehicle or vehicular equipment deemed a nuisance by the Board (collectively, "Prohibited Vehicles"). •All applicable provisions of the California Vehicle Code will be enforced on any private streets on the Property in accordance with California Vehicle Code Section 22658 (or any successor statute regarding removal of parked cars and required warning signs).The Association may establish "Parking" and "No Parking" areas within the Common Area, in accordance with California Vehicle CodeSection 22658 (or successor statute). •The Association has the right and obligation to enforce all parking restrictions and to remove any violating vehicles in accordance with the California Vehicle Code, or other applicable laws. EASEMENT LEGAL RIGHTS SEWER –EXISTING SEWER LATERAL PERIMETER BLOCK WALL STOP SIGNS @ ENTRANCE & EXIT PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS •CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN ZONING AT 18DU/AC (SAME AS SURROUNDING COMMUNITY) •EXCEEDS REQUIRED PARKING BY 5 SPACES •PROVIDE ADDITIONAL NEW HOUSING FOR ANAHEIM RESIDENTS •AFFORDABLE UNITS -10% OF PROJECT (2 UNITS) –ADDING TO REQUIRED RHNA NUMBERS •DESIGNED TO BE COMPATABLE WITH THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY •PARKING MANAGEMENT REGULATED BY CC&Rs & HOA •EXTENSIVE COMMUNITY OUTREACH 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2020-00248 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-00536 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2021-00336 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06097 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19141 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT LOCATION: This property is located on north side of Broadway, approximately 275 feet east of Euclid Street (1661-1673 West Broadway). APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC, represented by Kim Prijatel. The property owner is Best Western Summit Inn Inc., represented by Allen Liou. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following zoning entitlements: 1) A General Plan amendment to amend the land use designation from Office – Low to Mid Density Residential; 2) A zoning reclassification from the C-G (General Commercial) zone to the RM-3.5 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone; 3) A conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the construction of a 34- unit, attached single-family residential project with modified development standards; 4) A tentative tract map to permit a 1-lot, 34 unit subdivision for condominium purposes; and 5) A development agreement to permit a voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 11 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1) By motion, recommend that the City Council approve the attached resolution determining that the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the proposed project is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Attachment 1); 2) Approve the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 (Attachment 2); 3) By motion, recommend that the City Council introduce and adopt the attached draft ordinance for Reclassification No. 2021-00336 (Attachment 3); 4) By motion, recommend that the City Council approve the attached draft resolution for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 (Attachment 4); 5) By motion, recommend that the City Council approve the attached draft resolution for Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 (Attachment 5); and, 6) Approve the attached resolution recommending City Council approval of a Development Agreement (Development Permit No. 2020-00248 (Attachment 6)). BACKGROUND: This item was on the Planning Commission agenda for June 20, 2022; however, that meeting was cancelled due to lack of a quorum and this item was noticed again for the July 6 , 2022 meeting. This 1.55-acre property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone and is developed with three multi-tenant office buildings. The site is designated for Office – Low land uses by the General Plan. Multiple-family residential land uses are adjacent to the property to the north and across Broadway to the south, a religious assembly use is adjacent to the east, and commercial and community and religious assembly uses are adjacent to the west. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct 34 attached, single-family residences using the RM-3.5 zone development standards. The units would be in five, three-story buildings, consisting of two to four bedroom units with attached two-car garages. The units would contain between 1,062 and 1,633 square feet of living area. Vehicle access would be provided from a driveway on Broadway. One hundred parking spaces would be provided with 68 spaces in garages and 32 open spaces. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 11 Plan Type Number of Units Square Footage Bedrooms Plan 1 6 1,062 2 Plan 2a 4 1,342 2 Plan 2b 4 1,342 3 Plan 3 10 1,317 3 Plan 4 10 1,633 4 Plan Type Matrix The project would have a modern contemporary architectural design with a variety of materials including stucco, stone veneer, metal awnings, and fiber cement sidings. The color palette would include a mix of whites, greys, blues, with yellows. The first story would include stucco with stone veneer accents. The second and third stories would be painted white and contrasting grays, and would incorporate stucco and fiber cement siding in white, gray, blue, and ochre. Townhomes with second-story decks would have contrasting metal railings. The project architecture and design would also incorporate façade variations to provide further articulation. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 11 Typical Elevation Recreational-Leisure Area: A total of 9,480 square feet of common recreational area is proposed, and 9,350 square feet is required. The common area amenities would include a social gathering area with accent paving and specimen trees, and there would be landscaped paseos with decorative pottery. Private areas would include decks and ground floor patios at some of the units. Development Agreement: The applicant proposes to enter into a voluntary Development Agreement with the City to contribute $1,000 per residential unit ($34,000) towards the City’s affordable housing programs. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested entitlement action: General Plan Amendment: The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan is the guide for the City’s future development. It designates the distribution and location of specific land uses and establishes the permitted densities for each land use designation. The applicant is requesting a General Plan amendment in order to redesignate the property from the Office – Low land use to the Mid Density Residential land use. Before the Planning Commission may recommend approval of a General Plan amendment, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; 2) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; 3) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and 4) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. The Land Use Element describes the Mid Density Residential designation as providing for the development of a wide range of residential uses, including detached, small-lot single-family General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 5 of 11 homes, attached single-family homes, patio homes, zero lot line homes, duplexes, townhouses, and mobile home parks. The permitted density range is from zero to 27 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed project would have a density of 21.9 dwelling units per acre. The proposed modification to the General Plan also supports the following General Plan policies intended to provide a variety of quality infill housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs and promote development integrated with surrounding land uses: o Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. o Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations. o Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses. o Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development. o Goal 7.1: Address the jobs-housing relationship by developing housing near job centers and transportation facilities. o Goal 9.1: West Anaheim: Establish and maintain a uniquely identifiable well- balanced community that is an attractive and safe place to live, work, visit, learn and retire, supported by quality, family oriented neighborhoods and businesses. The project site is adjacent to, and across the street from, existing multiple-family residential land uses, which have a Medium Density Residential land use designation. There are also commercial and community and religious assembly land uses adjacent to the site. Staff believes that the requested Mid Density Residential land use designation would be compatible with and complementary to these surrounding land uses because the proposed amendment would maintain internal consistency of the General Plan by furthering the Goals identified above. Further, the project would not be detrimental to public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the amendment would result in residential development opportunities that would be compatible with the existing residential land uses within the immediate vicinity of the project, as well as commercial and community and religious assembly uses; the project would maintain the balance of land uses within the City because the amendment would provide quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs and would be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses; and the property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed map amendment, including access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding residential land uses. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested General Plan amendment. Reclassification: The property is zoned “C-G” General Commercial. The project includes a proposed General Plan amendment to Mid Density Residential as described above, and the implementing zone for this General Plan designation would be “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential. Accordingly, the applicant proposes to reclassify the property and staff supports this General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 6 of 11 request because the proposed RM-3.5 zone would comply with and implement the proposed Mid Density Residential land use designation. Conditional Use Permit: With the proposed Reclassification, the project would be subject to the “RM-3.5” Multiple Family Residential zoning requirements. In this zone, development standards, including setback and building separation requirements, may be modified as part of a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications serve to achieve a high quality project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. Before the Planning Commission may recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a planned unit development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The uses within the project are compatible; 2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing buildings conform with the provisions of this title; 3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate; 4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; 5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area; 6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; 7) The project complies with the General Plan and any applicable zoning or specific plan; and 8) The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Building-to-Building Setback: The applicant requests to modify the minimum required setbacks to 20’-6”, where the Municipal Code requires a 40-foot separation between two-story buildings with parallel walls that are designated as “primary” walls. Primary walls are building walls that contain an entrance and/or windows opening into living areas. Setbacks for projects in the RM- 3.5 zone may be modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The proposed project would provide reduced building-to-building setbacks of 20’-6” at the narrowest point, and this is consistent with modifications granted previously to similar projects. The three-story primary building elevations would be separated by attractive landscaped paseos, common area landscape, or drive aisles for garages, and would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. The elevations would also be enhanced and articulated with quality design features. The proposed modification would help achieve a functional, pedestrian-friendly design and provide for a high-quality living environment. Interior Structural Setback: The applicant requests to modify the interior setbacks along the east and north property lines adjacent to the religious assembly use and carports for the multiple-family residential use. The Code identifies structural setback requirements based on building height and building wall categories. As previously stated, primary building walls contain entrances and exits and/or windows opening into living spaces where most activity occurs, such as dining rooms, living rooms, family rooms, kitchens and bedrooms. Secondary building walls contain windows opening into bathrooms, closets, stairwells and corridors. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 7 of 11 Buildings are proposed with three-story primary walls adjacent to the south and north property lines setback a minimum of 15 feet where the Code requires 20 feet. Though defined as a primary wall because it would include windows for bedrooms and other living spaces, the project design would include only clerestory windows on these elevations for the entries, great rooms, and bedrooms, as shown below. A clerestory (or sometimes called clear story) are windows that are set high on the wall, above eye level. Since the clerestory windows would limit visibility from these areas and these buildings would be adjacent to carports and a religious assembly use, staff believes the reduced setback would provide good design that is compatible with existing development and meets the intent of the interior setback requirement. Site Plan Window Analysis Interior Landscape Setback: The applicant requests to modify the interior landscape setback along portions of the west property line. The Code requires a five-foot setback, and the project would provide a zero setback to accommodate existing power poles along the property line. The project would include the required six-foot tall property line wall separating the project from the adjacent commercial and community and religious assembly uses. While a five-foot landscape setback would be provided where there are no power poles, there would be five-foot projections into the setback to accommodate the masonry wall providing required clearance around the pole for maintenance, as shown below. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 8 of 11 Power Pole Area Plan Staff believes the reduced setback would provide a design that is compatible with the adjacent uses with the required six-foot masonry wall allowing necessary access for maintenance of the poles. The applicant has also proposed climbing vines on the interior side of the wall pop outs for screening where there is room to accommodate planting, depicted in the elevation and section below. West Property Line Wall Elevation and Section (Typical) Street Setback: The applicant requests a 10-foot setback from ground floor patios where 12-feet would be required. Although less than a 20-percent reduction is eligible for an Administrative Adjustment, the request shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission when associated with other discretionary entitlements. The two-foot encroachment into the required setback for patios would allow larger private patios and create a private space separating the units from the public sidewalk along Broadway, while still maintaining pedestrian connectivity with walkways and gates leading to the private patios. Staff believes this design would add to the livability and privacy of the proposed residences. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 9 of 11 Parking Requirements: The Municipal Code requires 100 parking spaces for the proposed project. The project has been designed to provide the required number of parking spaces in 68 garaged spaces and 32 open spaces, thereby meeting the Code requirement. Tentative Tract Map: Before the Planning Commission may recommend approval of the tentative tract map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation proposed as part of General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, now pending. 2) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, including their design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone proposed as part of Reclassification No. 2021-00336, now pending, with the exception of the reduced setback being proposed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project. 4) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. 5) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. A tentative tract map is proposed to create a 1-lot condominium subdivision for the 34 “airspace” condominium units. All common areas, including driveways, recreational areas, paseos and sidewalks would be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association. The proposed density of 21.9 dwelling units per acre is permitted under the Mid Density Residential land use designation, which allows up to 27 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the project does not conflict with easements acquired by the public and complies with all subdivision requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the tentative tract map request. Affordable Housing: In 2018, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-106, which is a policy statement that encourages a dialogue between City staff and residential developers to consider options and approaches for addressing the City’s affordable housing needs. Pursuant to the resolution, City staff and the applicant discussed potential options to support the creation of affordable housing. Although the applicant does not propose on-site affordable units, the applicant has offered to provide a voluntary financial contribution in an amount of $34,000 to assist in the General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 10 of 11 City’s affordable housing programs which will be secured through approval of the proposed development agreement. Such funding would be used to fund the City’s affordable housing programs such as the recently created Senior Safety Net program, which is a pilot program that offers emergency financial help, assistance paying monthly rent, and counseling and service referrals to prevent housing challenges among seniors. Details of this voluntary financial contribution is included in the proposed development agreement (Attachment 6a). Development Agreement: A development agreement is a contract for development which provides a property owner or developer a vested right to proceed with an approved development, securing the entitlement along with established regulations and fees, in exchange for the City obtaining benefits beyond what would otherwise be required by existing regulations and ordinances. State law allows cities and project applicants to enter into a development agreement for their mutual benefit. The proposed development agreement would provide the applicant with the certainty desired to develop the project and, in return, would provide funding for the City’s affordable housing programs. In 1982, the City Council approved a resolution establishing procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements. This resolution identifies four items necessary for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council. These items are: 1) The proposed development agreement is consistent with the General Plan; 2) The proposed development agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the proposed project is and will be located; 3) The proposed development agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; and 4) The proposed development agreement is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Staff believes that the proposed project and development agreement meet the requirements listed above. As described in this report, the proposed project is consistent with the proposed General Plan designation, is compatible with the surrounding uses, and meets the development standards of the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone, allowing for orderly development. Also, the proposed development agreement would serve to provide surety for the developer and includes benefits to the City by providing funding for affordable housing programs. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending approval of the development agreement to the City Council. Community Outreach: The applicant hosted a virtual community outreach meeting in July 2021. The applicant provided a summary of the meeting, included as Attachment 10. Environmental Impact Analysis: An Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to identify necessary mitigation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On May 5, 2022, staff circulated the IS/MND for a 20-day public review period. Staff General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and Development Permit No. 2020-00248 July 6, 2022 Page 11 of 11 posted the IS/MND on the City’s web page, made hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and uploaded it digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database. Staff prepared a joint Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the IS/MND and Notice of Public Hearing, which was mailed to potentially affected public agencies and interested parties, as well as property owners and tenants within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project. Staff also posted the notice on site and with the OC Clerk-Recorder in addition to publication in The Anaheim Bulletin. The City received one comment letter during the comment period. Attachment 11 provides the comment letter and the associated response to any CEQA-related issues. None of the comments received resulted in the need to recirculate the IS/MND or to prepare an environmental impact report. Mitigation measures have been identified in the IS/MND to mitigate project impacts to biological resources, cultural and tribal resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, and hydrology and water quality. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, staff recommends the adoption of these mitigation measures as conditions of approval in the attached draft resolution for the approval of the proposed project. With implementation of these measures, the IS/MND concluded that project impacts will be reduced to levels considered less than significant and there would be no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is designed in a manner that will provide a quality living environment for its future residents and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. In addition, the proposed project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. Staff recommends approval of the proposed request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor, AICP Scott Koehm, AICP Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft City Council MND Resolution 2. Draft Planning Commission General Plan Amendment Resolution 3. Draft City Council Reclassification Ordinance 4. Draft City Council Conditional Use Permit Resolution 5. Draft City Council Tentative Tract Map Resolution 6. Draft Planning Commission Development Agreement Resolution a. Draft Development Agreement 7. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration a. Appendices 8. Project Description 9. Project Plans 10. Applicant Community Outreach Summary 11. Comments Received and Response to IS/MND Comments 12. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMNENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-00536, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2021-00336, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06097, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19141 AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DEV2020-00248) (1661-1673 WEST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive a verified petition for General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021- 00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and a Development Agreement to construct a residential development consisting of 34 single-family attached residential units with modified development standards (the "Proposed Project"), on that certain real property located at 1661-1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for Office – Low land uses by the General Plan. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project contingent upon approval of Reclassification No. 2021-00336, now pending; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Project is to construct a residential development consisting of 34 single-family attached residential units with modified development standards subject to approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 18.06.030 (Uses), of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Code; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 is to amend the General Plan Land Use designation from Office – Low to Mid Density Residential; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2021-00336 is to reclassify the property from the “C- G” General Commercial zone to “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone; and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement proposes to provide the developer a vested right to develop the Proposed Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2021- 00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs; and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 proposes to construct a residential development consisting of 34 single-family attached residential units with modified development standards; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City’s web page, with hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and it was uploaded digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMRP No. 381"). A complete copy of MMRP No. 381 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City of Anaheim on July 6 , 2022 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by its motion, and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to this Resolution and contained in MMRP No. 381, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP No. 381; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ____________day of __________, 2022, as the time, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including MMRP No. 381 and the comments received to date and the responses prepared, the City Council does find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures and, together with MMRP No. 381, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project; 3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impacts upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMRP No. 381 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council; and WHEREAS, this City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the evidence received to date, does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) based on the findings and determinations as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures and, together with MMRP No. 381, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMRP No. 381 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council; 3. That the City Council hereby approves and adopts Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP No. 381; and 4. That the City Council authorizes and directs City staff to file with the Clerk of the County of Orange a Notice of Determination in accordance with Section 15075(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ___ day of ________, 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR PRO TEM OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: ______________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXHIBIT B NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program #381 for the West Broadway Townhome Project Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Prepared for: City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.5238 Contact: Andy Uk, Associate Planner Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 250 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92602 714.508.4100 Contact: Glenn Lajoie, AICP, Project Director Cecilia So, Project Manager Report Date: April 15, 2022 City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Preface FirstCarbon Solutions 2 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx PREFACE Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 requires a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) whenever it adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) in conjunction with a project approval. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures occurs during project implementation. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the West Broadway Townhome Project concluded that project implementation could result in potentially significant effects on the environment and mitigation measures were incorporated into the proposed project or are required as a condition of project approval that would reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. This MMRP documents how and when the mitigation measures adopted by the lead agency would be implemented and confirms that potential environmental impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels as identified in the MND. This document does not discuss those subjects that the environmental analysis demonstrates would result in less than significant impacts and for which no mitigation was proposed or necessary. City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 3 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Table 1: City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial 2.4 Biological Resources MM BIO-1: Protection of Active Bird Nests (includes pre- construction survey and implementation of avoidance buffer, if found). 1. The removal of trees and vegetation shall be avoided during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31), if feasible. If avoidance of tree and vegetation removal during the nesting season is infeasible, then the following measures shall be required: a. If ground-disturbing or vegetation-removing construction activities occur during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within 72 hours prior to scheduled tree removal, to determine whether or not active nests are present in the construction zone. b. If an active nest is located during pre-construction surveys, a qualified Biologist shall determine an appropriately sized avoidance buffer based on the species and anticipated disturbance level. A qualified Biologist shall delineate the avoidance buffer using Environmentally Sensitive Area fencing, pin flags, and or yellow caution tape. The buffer zone shall be maintained around the active nest site(s) until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. No construction activities or construction foot traffic is allowed to occur within the avoidance buffer(s). c. The qualified Biologist shall monitor the active nest during construction activities to prevent any potential impacts that may result from the construction of the proposed project, until the young have fledged. Confirm receipt of qualified Biologist’s pre- construction survey and review submittal of survey documents; confirm on-site monitoring by the qualified Biologist if active nests are present. Prior to issuance of grading permit and during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31) City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 4 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial 2.5 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources MM CUL-1: An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology shall perform an inspection of the site for potential archaeological resources once grubbing, ground clearing, and demolition are complete, and prior to any grading or project-related ground disturbance. In the event exposed soils indicate cultural materials may be present, this may be followed by regular or periodic archaeological monitoring as determined by the Archaeologist, but full-time archaeological monitoring is not required at this time. It is always possible that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown, buried cultural resources. In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project area should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria. If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA The owner/developer shall provide documentation that a site inspection was completed by a qualified Archaeologist. If archaeological materials are encountered, confirm archaeological monitoring is conducted. Confirm compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 permit(s) and confirm receipt of DPR forms; review qualified Archaeologist’s submittal of findings and documentation. Prior to any grading or project-related ground disturbance City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 5 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeological Monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study. MM CUL-2: In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken: 1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendant (MLD) may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the If human remains encountered, confirm proper notification occurs. If human remains are encountered, confirm compliance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, confirm the County Coroner contacts the NAHC within 24 hours. During project- related earthmoving ground disturbance; prior to construction; during construction City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 6 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Section 5097.98, or 2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance: • The NAHC is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission. • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. 2.5 Tribal Cultural MM TCR-1: Retention of a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall coordinate with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation Native American tribe in retention of a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground- disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall Confirm retention of a Native American (Tribal Monitor) from the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation Native American tribe by receipt of a copy of the executed contract. Confirm receipt of daily monitoring logs. Prior to commencement of any grading and/or construction activity; during construction activities City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 7 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on- site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects Upon discovery of any archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Section Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery If buried cultural resources encountered, confirm construction activities have ceased. If buried cultural resources encountered, confirm the development of appropriate avoidance and treatment measures. During construction activities upon discovery of any archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 8 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. MM TCR-3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the owner/developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The owner/developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, if the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the owner/developer to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity shall cease until consultation with the MLD is complete regarding recommendations pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. Discovery of human remains shall also follow CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. If human remains are uncovered, confirm construction activities have ceased and the County Coroner has been contacted. If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, confirm the MLD and NAHC have been contacted. If human remains are uncovered, confirm compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. During ground- disturbing activities, if human remains are uncovered City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department MM TCR-4: Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall retain Confirm retention of a Native American (Tribal Prior to the commencement of City of Anaheim Planning and City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 9 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Upon discovery of any archaeological or TCRs, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines SS 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate Monitor) by receipt of a copy of the executed contract. Confirm receipt of daily monitoring logs. Upon discovery of any archaeological or TCRs, confirm construction activities cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. If the resources are Native American in origin, confirm coordinate with the Tribal Representative and the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. any grading and/or construction activity Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 10 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the project developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The project developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the project developer to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity shall cease until consultation with the MLD is complete regarding recommendations pursuant to Public Resources City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 11 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial Section 5097.98. Discovery of human remains shall also follow CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. 2.7 Geology and Soils MM GEO-1: The owner/developer would be required to implement the recommendations provided on Page 14 through Page 32 in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta), on January 4, 2021. The Geotechnical recommendations that are explained in detail on Page 14 through Page 32 of the Geotechnical Investigation shall be implemented. These include general earthwork requirements for site preparation, removal of unsuitable soils, over-excavation of building pads, compaction standards, groundwater and seepage, documentation, treatment of removal bottoms, fill placement, moisture content, mixing, import soils, utility trenches, back-cut stability, storm water infiltration systems, and boundary conditions. Additionally, these include requirements related to structural design, foundation design, foundation systems, slabs, moisture barriers, seismic design, walls, footing excavations, slabs and walkways, concrete design, corrosion, pavement design, as well as lot maintenance, and future plan reviews. The Geotechnical Investigation included in Appendix D is incorporated herein by reference as fully set forth in this mitigation measure. Confirm recommendations from the Geotechnical Investigation have been incorporated into project construction documents. Conduct on-site inspection. Prior to ground- disturbing activities and during construction activities City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department MM GEO-2: If it is determined that fossil-bearing sediments are present on-site, a qualified Monitor shall be required to be present during any ground-disturbing activities during the project. In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction activities, excavations within a 100-foot radius of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted, and the owner/developer shall retain a qualified Paleontologist to examine the discovery. The Paleontologist If it is determined that fossil -bearing sediments are present on-site, confirm a qualified Monitor and/or Paleontologist is present on-site during ground- disturbing activities. During ground- disturbing activities City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 12 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial shall document the discovery in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The Paleontologist shall determine procedures that would be followed before construction activities are allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the owner/developer determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of construction activities on the discovery. The plan shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim for review and approval prior to implementation, and the owner/developer shall adhere to the recommendations in the plan. If avoidance is not feasible, review and approve an excavation plan. 2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials MM HAZ-1: The owner/developer shall conduct a comprehensive, pre-demolition asbestos-containing materials (ACM) survey in accordance with the sampling protocol of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) prior to any activities with the potential to disturb building materials, in order to determine whether ACMs are present. The owner/developer shall submit the ACM survey to the City prior to issuance of a demolition permit. In the event that ACMs are detected, the proper removal and disposal, consistent with existing regulations, of the building materials would occur prior to any activities with the potential to disturb them. Review and approve comprehensive, pre- demolition ACM survey. In the event that ACMs are detected, confirm the proper removal and disposal of the building materials, and compliance with existing regulations. Prior to any activities with the potential to disturb building materials City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department 2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality Implement MM GEO-1. See MM GEO-1. See MM GEO-1. See MM GEO-1. 2.20 Mandatory Findings of Significance Implementation of MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, MM TCR-4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1. See MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR -3, MM TCR-4, MM See MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, See MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, City of Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program FirstCarbon Solutions 13 H:\REPORTS\Planning Commission\2022 PC Meetings\PC 07-06-2022\Item 2 DEV2020-00248 Anaheim A Broadway Condos njt\Attachments\ATT No. 1 Draft City Council MND Resolution.docx Mitigation Measures Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible for Verification Verification of Completion Date Initial GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1, above. MM TCR-4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1, above. MM TCR-4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1, above. [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-00536 (DEV2020-00248) (1661-1673 WEST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536") for certain real property generally located on the north side of Broadway, approximately 275 feet east of Euclid Street and commonly referred to as 1661-1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), for the purpose of allowing the applicant to construct 34 attached, single-family residences ; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size and is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project subject to approval of Reclassification No. 2021-00336, now pending. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for "Office – Low uses; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 proposes to amend "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate the Property from the "Office – Low" to the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City’s web page, with hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and it was uploaded digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that - 2 - PC2022-*** are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 381"). A complete copy of MMP No. 381 is on file and can be viewed in the Planning Services Division of the City; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, this Planning Commission found and determined and recommended that the City Council also find and determine that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP No. 381 and that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No. 381; and WHEREAS, this request was advertised and noticed for a Planning Commission public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on June 20, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 2022 was cancelled due to a lack of quorum; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on July 6, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find: 1. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan, as the proposed modifications to the General Plan are consistent with Goals 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, 6.1, 7.1, and 9.1 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities, to pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations, to address the City’s diverse housing needs, to promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land uses, to enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development, to address the jobs-housing relationship by developing housing near job centers and transportation facilities and to establish and maintain a uniquely identifiable well-balanced community that is an attractive and safe place to live, work, visit, learn and retire, supported by quality, family oriented neighborhoods and businesses. - 3 - PC2022-*** 2. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed amendment to the Anaheim General Plan would result in residential development opportunities that would be compatible with the existing residential development the vicinity of the project. 3. That proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 would maintain the balance of land uses within the City because the proposed amendment would provide quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs and would be would be compatible with and complementary to these surrounding land uses. 4. That the Property to be re-designated by proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2021- 00536 is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses because the project is designed to complement the surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Anaheim approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 pertaining to amending "Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan to re-designate the Property from the "Office – Low" to the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation as set forth in Exhibit “B” to this Resolution. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: - 4 - PC2022-*** SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - 1 - ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2021-00336) (DEV2020-00248) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive a verified petition to rezone or reclassify that certain real property located at 1661-1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") to reclassify the property from “C-G” General Commercial zone to “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone, which reclassification is designated as Reclassification No. 2021-00336; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size, and is currently developed with commercial office buildings. The project site is located in the “C-G” Transition zone, and is designated for “Office – Low” land uses by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2021-00336 is proposed in conjunction with a request for (i) General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536; (ii) approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 to permit the construction of a residential development consisting of 34 single-family attached residential units with modified development standards; (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 to permit a 1-lot, 34 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes, and (iv) approval of a Development Agreement to provide the Developer a vested right to develop the Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2021- 00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and the Development Agreement, and the Project shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and - 2 - was also made available for review on the City’s web page, with hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and it was uploaded digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMRP No. 381"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City of Anaheim on July 6 , 2022 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by its motion, and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures contained in MMRP No. 381, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP No. 381; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to Proposed Project, the Planning Commission, by motion, recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Reclassification No. 2021-00336, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to the adoption by the City Council of (1) a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map no. 19141; and, (2) an ordinance approving the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ___ day of _____, 2022, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and - 3 - WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find and determine as follows: 1. Reclassification of the Property to from “C-G” General Commercial zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone is consistent with the Property’s proposed Mid Density land use designation in the General Plan. 2. The proposed reclassification of the Property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community and is compatible with the neighboring properties, which are developed with residential and commercial uses. 3. The proposed reclassification of the Property does properly relate to the zone and its permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the Property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community in that surrounding properties include commercial and multiple-family residential uses in “C-G” General Commercial and “RM- 4” Multiple-Family Residential zones; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Ordinance, that the facts stated in this Ordinance are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Ordinance. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Zoning Map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended by rezoning and reclassifying the subject Property, as described above, to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone from the “C-G” General Commerical zone of the City of Anaheim. SECTION 2. The City Zoning Map shall be, and the same is hereby, amended and the above-described Property shall be excluded from the zone in which it is now situated and incorporated in and made a part of the zone or zones as above set forth, and said City Zoning Map, as amended, is hereby adopted and the Planning Department is hereby directed to prepare a sectional zoning map to be added to the City Zoning Map showing the changes hereby approved and adopted. - 4 - SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim, and thirty (30) days from and after its final passage, it shall take effect and be in full force. - 5 - THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2022, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM _________________________________ MAYOR PRO TEM OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: _____________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - - 7 - EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06097 (DEV2020-00248) (1661-1673 WEST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 to permit the construction of a residential development consisting of 34 single-family residential units with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in the building to building setbacks, interior structural and landscape setbacks, and street setbacks of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential zone, on that certain real property located at 1661-1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 is proposed in conjunction with (i) General Plan Amendment 2021-00536 to change the land use designation from “Office – Low” to “Mid Density Residential,” (ii) Reclassification No. 2021-00336 to reclassify the property from “C-G” General Commercial zone to “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 to permit a 1-lot, 34 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes, and (iv) approval of a Development Agreement to provide the Developer a vested right to develop the Project in accordance with General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, and the Development Agreement, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, a single-family attached residential development within the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential zone is subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection .010 of Section 18.06.030 (Uses). Pursuant to Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), the minimum setbacks set forth in Section 18.06.0090 (Structural Setbacks) of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) may be modified in order to achieve a high quality project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If approved, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 will permit the reduction in minimum building to building setbacks, interior structural and landscape setbacks, and street setbacks of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential zone; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size, and is currently developer with commercial office buildings. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for Office – Low land uses by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City’s web page, with hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and it was uploaded digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMRP No. 381"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by motion, the Planning Commission found and determined that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures contained in MMRP No. 381, and recommended that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMRP No. 381; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to Proposed Project, the Planning Commission, by motion, recommended that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to the adoption by the City Council of (1) a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No 2021-00536; (2) an ordinance approving and adopting Reclassification No. 2018-00316; (3) a resolution approving Tentative Tract map No. 19141; and (4) an ordinance approving Development Agreement No. 2020-00003; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission recommendation, made by motion, the City Council did fix the ___ day of _____, 2022, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .030 (Modifications of Other Standards) of Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), this City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby find and determine the following facts with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097: 1. The uses within the project are compatible with the surrounding land uses. 2. New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area. The proposed buildings are single-family attached, three-story residential project at a density and scale that is compatible with the surrounding multiple-family residential, commercial, and community and religious assembly uses in the vicinity. 3. Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate because the project entry has been designed in accordance with City standards. 4. The Project is consistent with any adopted design guidelines applicable to the Property because the project has been designed to include quality architecture, sound attenuation, common recreational areas, and sufficient building setback buffers from the existing surrounding uses. 5. The size and shape of the site proposed for the Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area because the project has been designed to include Code compliant parking and recreational areas, sufficient building setbacks from the surrounding townhome community, and new pedestrian paths within the neighborhood. 6. The traffic generated by the project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the Project and infrastructure has been designed to sufficiently accommodate traffic generated by the project. 7. The Project will comply with the General Plan and zoning for the property because the project will provide for the development of a quality single-family attached living environment with design amenities, such as private open space or common recreation areas. The permitted density range under the Mid density residential designation is from zero to 27 dwelling units per gross acre. The proposed project will have a density of 21.9 dwelling units per acre. 8. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the City Council does hereby approve and adopt Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, contingent upon and subject to: (1) adoption of a resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536; (2) the adoption by the City Council of an ordinance approving and adopting Reclassification No. 2021-00336; (3) adoption of a resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19141; and (4) adoption of an ordinance approving the Development Agreement, all of which entitlements are now pending; and the mitigation measures set forth in MMRP 381, and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR PRO TEM OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: ______________________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06097 (DEV2020-00248) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 1 The owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 The owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The owner/developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of any permits. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 The owner/developer shall ensure that all required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer in State of California. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 The owner/developer shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 The owner/developer shall submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use Public Works Department, Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the storm water runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. 7 The owner/developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities Water Engineering 8 MM BIO-1: Protection of Active Bird Nests (includes pre-construction survey and implementation of avoidance buffer, if found). 1. The removal of trees and vegetation shall be avoided during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31), if feasible. If avoidance of tree and vegetation removal during the nesting season is infeasible, then the following measures shall be required: a. If ground-disturbing or vegetation-removing construction activities occur during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within 72 hours prior to scheduled tree removal, to determine whether or not active nests are present in the construction zone. b. If an active nest is located during pre-construction surveys, a qualified Biologist shall determine an appropriately sized avoidance buffer based on the species and anticipated disturbance level. A qualified Biologist shall delineate the avoidance buffer using Environmentally Sensitive Area fencing, pin flags, and or yellow caution tape. The buffer zone shall be maintained around the active nest site(s) until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. No construction activities or construction foot traffic is allowed to occur within the avoidance buffer(s). The qualified Biologist shall monitor the active nest during construction activities to prevent any potential impacts that may result from the construction of the proposed project, until the young have fledged. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 MM CUL-1: An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology shall perform an inspection of the site for potential archaeological resources once grubbing, ground clearing, and demolition are complete, and prior to any grading or project-related ground disturbance. In the event exposed soils indicate cultural materials may be present, this may be followed by regular or periodic archaeological monitoring as determined by the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Archaeologist, but full-time archaeological monitoring is not required at this time. It is always possible that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown, buried cultural resources. In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project area should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria. If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeological Monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study. 10 MM TCR-1: Retention of a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall coordinate with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation Native American tribe in retention of a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). 11 MM TCR-4: Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall retain a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Upon discovery of any archaeological or TCRs, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines SS 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the project developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The project developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the project developer to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity 12 MM GEO-1: The owner/developer would be required to implement the recommendations provided on Page 14 through Page 32 in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta), on January 4, 2021. The Geotechnical recommendations that are explained in detail on Page 14 through Page 32 of the Geotechnical Investigation shall be implemented. These include general earthwork requirements for site preparation, removal of unsuitable soils, over- excavation of building pads, compaction standards, groundwater and seepage, documentation, treatment of removal bottoms, fill placement, moisture content, mixing, import soils, utility trenches, back-cut stability, storm water infiltration systems, and boundary conditions. Additionally, these include requirements related to structural design, foundation design, foundation systems, slabs, moisture barriers, seismic design, walls, footing excavations, slabs and walkways, concrete design, corrosion, pavement design, as well as lot maintenance, and future plan reviews. The Geotechnical Investigation included in Appendix D is incorporated herein by reference as fully set forth in this mitigation measure. Public Works Department, Development Services Division PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS 13 Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red by the owner/developer to prohibit parallel parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on building plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 14 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner/developer shall submit draft Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are prepared by Public Works Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: a. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles. b. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the Association or City of Anaheim staff. c. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Planning Director or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. d. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. Traffic Engineering Division 15 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided by the owner/developer and shown on plans submitted by the owner/developer to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 16 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537- 537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the owner/developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 17 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground by the owner/developer in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 18 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated by the owner/developer and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 19 The owner/developer shall ensure all existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall Public Utilities Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Water Engineering Division 20 The owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic aboveground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the owner/developer to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 21 The owner/developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 22 Water improvement plans shall be submitted by the owner/developer to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 23 Individual water service and/or fire line connections shall be provided by the owner/developer for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 24 The owner/developer shall record Tract Map No. 19141 pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Code. Provide a PDF copy of the recorded map to the City Engineer’s office. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 25 The owner/developer shall provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 26 The owner/developer shall design per City Standards full improvements for all impacted public streets/facilities in accordance with City Code, Public Works Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Standards and Specifications. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited to the following: driveways closures with new curb and gutter and sidewalk, commercial driveway approach, parkway landscaping with irrigation along Broadway, storm drain lateral connection and manhole, sewer lateral connection. Development Services Division 27 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained by the owner/developer from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 28 The owner/developer shall ensure all Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Public Works Department, Development Services Division 29 The owner/developer shall submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 30 The owner/developer shall pay cash in lieu fee for the construction of the required ultimate public improvements along the project frontage of Broadway per City Std. No. 160-A with Class II Bike Lane. The improvements include but not limited to the following items: street widening, new pavement section, utilities relocation, concrete curb & gutter, landscaped parkway with irrigation, driveway approach, street light, and other appurtenances. An exhibit and cost estimate shall be submitted to Public Works, Development Services to determine the cash in lieu fee amount for review and approval. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 31 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the owner/developer shall submit draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: 1. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles. 2. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the Association or City of Anaheim staff. 3. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Planning Director or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. 4. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area and Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. 32 MM HAZ-1: The owner/developer shall conduct a comprehensive, pre- demolition asbestos-containing materials (ACM) survey in accordance with the sampling protocol of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) prior to any activities with the potential to disturb building materials, in order to determine whether ACMs are present. The owner/developer shall submit the ACM survey to the City prior to issuance of a demolition permit. In the event that ACMs are detected, the proper removal and disposal, consistent with existing regulations, of the building materials would occur prior to any activities with the potential to disturb them. Planning and Building Department PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 33 All public improvements shall be constructed by the owner/developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Damages to existing public improvements due to utility installation shall be removed and reconstructed in accordance with City standards and specifications. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 34 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full by the owner/developer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 35 The owner/developer shall set all Monuments in accordance with the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 36 The owner/developer shall record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 37 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the owner/developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an amendment to the CC&R’s approved by the City Engineer, Planning Director and the City Attorney's office shall be recorded. Gates, if any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 38 The owner/developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 39 MM CUL-2: In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken: 1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendant (MLD) may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Section 5097.98, or 2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance: • The NAHC is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission. • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. 40 MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects Upon discovery of any archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Section Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 41 MM TCR-3: Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the owner/developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The owner/developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, if the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the owner/developer to determine proper Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity shall cease until consultation with the MLD is complete regarding recommendations pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. Discovery of human remains shall also follow CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. 42 MM GEO-2: If it is determined that fossil-bearing sediments are present on-site, a qualified Monitor shall be required to be present during any ground-disturbing activities during the project. In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction activities, excavations within a 100-foot radius of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted, and the owner/developer shall retain a qualified Paleontologist to examine the discovery. The Paleontologist shall document the discovery in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The Paleontologist shall determine procedures that would be followed before construction activities are allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the owner/developer determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of construction activities on the discovery. The plan shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim for review and approval prior to implementation, and the owner/developer shall adhere to the recommendations in the plan. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division ON-GOING DURING OPERATIONS 43 All new landscaping shall be installed by the owner/developer in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 44 The owner/developer shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities, Water Engineering GENERAL 45 The following minimum horizontal clearances shall be maintained by the owner/developer between proposed water main and other facilities: a. 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals Public Utilities, Water Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT b. 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities, including storm drains, gas, and electric c. 6-feet minimum separation from curb face d. 10-feet minimum separation from structures, footings, and trees. The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): a. 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, storm water BMPs, power poles, streetlights, and trees. b. 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. 46 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed by the owner/developer in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 47 No public water mains or laterals allowed by the owner/developer under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 48 The owner/developer shall ensure all fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 49 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed by the owner/developer on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 50 The owner/developer shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 51 The owner/developer shall ensure the following: Addressing: a. Each individual building and unit should be clearly marked with its appropriate building number and address. These should be positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular and pedestrian pathways throughout the complex. Main building numbers should be a minimum height of 12” and illuminated during the hours of darkness. b. Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be illuminated during hours of darkness. c. Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. Police Department 52 The owner/developer shall ensure the following: Doors: a. All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. b. The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece. c. Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be designed into all dwelling-unit front doors and all solid doors where exterior visibility is compromised. Police Department 53 The owner/developer shall ensure the following: Lighting: a. Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of darkness. b. Adequate lighting of parking lots and associated carports, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 54 The owner/developer shall ensure the following: Landscaping: a. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Shrubbery or ground cover should not generally exceed three feet in height and tree branches should not descend below six feet from the ground. b. Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. Police Department [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 5 RESOLUTION NO. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19141 (DEV2020-00248) (1661-1673 WEST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 to establish a 1-lot, 34-unit attached residential subdivision for that certain real property located 275 feet east of Euclid Street and commonly referred to as 1661- 1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 is proposed in conjunction with a request (i) to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to re-designate the Property from "Office – Low" to "Mid Density Residential" land uses, which amendment to the General Plan is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, (ii) approval of Reclassification No. 2021-00336 to reclassify the property from the “C-G” General Commercial zone to the “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential Zone, (iii) approval of a conditional use permit to permit the construction of 34 attached single-family residences with modified development standards, which is designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097" and (iv) approval of a Development Agreement to provide the developer a vested right to develop the Proposed Project, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs. General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Development Agreement No. 2021-00001, and Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size and is currently developed with commercial office buildings, and is located in the "C-G" General Commercial zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Office – Low land uses; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City’s web page, with hard copies available at City Hall and the Anaheim Public Library, and it was uploaded digitally with the Office of Planning and Research’s CEQAnet database; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2022, 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a summary of evidence and a report of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council did fix the ____day of ____ 2022, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and for the purpose of considering evidence for and against the Proposed Project, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, this City Council finds and determines and recommends that the City Council also find and determine that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMRP 381 and that the City Council approve and adopt MMRP 381; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the "Mid Density Residential" land use designation proposed as part of General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536, now pending. 2. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the "RM-3.5" Multiple Family Residential Zone contained in Chapter 18.06) of the Code. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project. 4. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified. 5. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. and; WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the City Council City of Anaheim does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption by the City Council of (i) a resolution approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536; (ii) an ordinance approving and adopting Reclassification No. 2021-00336, (iii) approval of a conditional use permit to permit the construction of 34 attached single-family residences with modified development standards, which is designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097" and (iv) approval of a Development Agreement to provide the developer a vested right to develop the Proposed Project, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs, all of which entitlements are now pending; the mitigation measures set forth in MMRP 381; and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this ____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM MAYOR PRO TEM OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: _____________________________________ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19141 (DEV2020-00248) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO MAP RECORDATION 1 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim public easement for emergency services and solid waste/trash collection access, along the interior private drive aisles, as shown on the TTM. Public Works, Development Services 2 All existing structures in conflict with the future property lines shall be demolished by the owner/developer. The owner/developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division prior to any demolition work. Public Works, Development Services 3 The vehicular access rights to Broadway shall be released and relinquished by the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim, except at approved driveway openings, as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. Public Works, Development Services 4 The owner/developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 5 The owner/developer shall submit improvement plans for the construction of required public improvements along the project frontage of Broadway to the Public Works Development Services Division for review, approval, and to determine the bond amounts. Improvements shall conform to the City Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 6 The final map shall be submittedby the owner/developer to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works, Development Services 7 The owner/developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 8 The owner/developer shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit shall be in accordance to City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 9 The owner/developer shall provide a Monumentation bond in an amount specified in writing by a Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works, Development Services NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 The owner/developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code Public Works, Development Services 11 The owner/developer shall provide non-interference letter for any improvements encroaching into existing 5-foot utility easement along the west side of the subject project that will remain on the subdivision lot from the affected easement owner. Public Works, Development Services [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 6 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVE AND ADOPT A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ANAHEIM 1 INV, LLC (DEV2020-00240) (1661-1673 WEST BROADWAY) WHEREAS, Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division 1 of Title 7 (commencing with Section 65864) of the Government Code of the State of California (herein referred to as the “Statute”) authorizes a city to enter into a contract which is called a development agreement in order to establish with certainty what regulations will govern the construction of a development; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “City Council”), as a charter city, enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the “Enabling Ordinance”), making the City subject to the Statute; and WHEREAS, pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 65865 of the Statute, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 on November 23, 1982 (herein referred to as the “Procedures Resolution”), establishing procedures and requirements for consideration of development agreements by the City upon receipt of an application therefor; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for a Development Agreement (“Development Project No. 2020-00240), for that certain real property located at 1661-1673 West Broadway in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), for the purpose of allowing the applicant to construct a residential development consisting of 34 single – family attached residential units (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement is proposed in conjunction with a request for (i) General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536 to amend the land use designation from Office – Low to Mid Density Residential; (ii) Reclassification No. 2021-00336 to reclassify the property to “RM-3.5” Multiple-Family Residential zone from the “C-G” General Commercial zone; (iii) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097 to permit a residential development consisting of 34 single-family attached residential units with modified development standards; and (iv) Tentative Tract Map No. 19141 to permit a 1-lot, 34 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for condominium purposes. General Plan Amendment 2021-00536, Reclassification No. 2021-00336, Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, the Development Agreement, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.55 acres in size. The project site is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone, and is designated for Schools land uses by the General Plan. - 2 - PC2022-*** The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project, subject to approval of Reclassification 2021-00336 , now pending; and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement is proposed to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights for the term of the Development Agreement, and in return the developer would provide funding for City’s affordable housing programs; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's CEQA Procedures to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on May 5, 2022, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard., Anaheim, California; at the Anaheim Public Library, Central Library at 500 West Broadway, Anaheim, California. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMRP No. 381"); and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, this request was advertised and noticed for a Planning Commission public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on June 20, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The Planning Commission meeting of June 20, 2022 was cancelled due to a lack of quorum; and - 3 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and based upon, all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the Development Agreement, does hereby further find and determine that proposed Development Agreement meets all of the standards and requirements set forth in the Procedures Resolution, which was adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982, that is: 1. The proposed Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in the General Plan; 2. The proposed Development Agreement No. is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the Project is and will be located, upon adoption of Reclassification No. 2021-00336, now pending; 3. The proposed Development Agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; 4. The proposed Development Agreement is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as it will provide funding to the City’s affordable housing programs; and 5. The proposed Development Agreement constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under, is entered into pursuant to, and is in compliance with the City’s charter powers, the requirements of Section 65867 of California Government Code and the Procedures Resolution, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve the Development Agreement, in the form presented at this meeting, contingent upon and subject to the approval of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00533, (2) Reclassification No. 2021- - 4 - PC2022-*** 00336, (3) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097, Tentative Tract Map No. 19141, (4) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 381 for the Project; and (5) the conditions of approval associated with Conditional Use Permit No. 2021- 06097, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susanna Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTACHMENT NO. 6a RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND, WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Anaheim P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92805 (SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2020-00248) BETWEEN CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ANAHEIM 1 INV, LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i 1. DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................... 2 2. PROPERTY, PURPOSE AND INTENT .................................................................................. 6 2.1 Property Description ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 City Objectives .............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Developer Objectives .................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Mutual Objectives ......................................................................................................... 7 3. AGREEMENT AND ASSURANCES ...................................................................................... 7 3.1 Agreement and Assurance on the Part of Developer .................................................... 7 3.2 Agreement and Assurances on the Part of the City ...................................................... 7 3.2.1 Entitlement to Develop ..................................................................................... 7 3.2.2 Changes in Applicable Rules ............................................................................ 7 3.2.3 Agreed Changes and Other Reserved Powers .................................................. 8 3.2.4 Subsequent Development ................................................................................. 8 3.2.5 Effective Development Standards .................................................................... 8 3.2.6 Timing and Sequencing of Development ......................................................... 9 3.3 Processing Fees; Extraordinary Processing Consultant Charges and Environmental Review .................................................................................................. 9 3.3.1 Processing Fees and Charges............................................................................ 9 3.3.2 Environmental Review ..................................................................................... 9 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN .......................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Vested Right to Develop Property ................................................................................ 9 5. ANNUAL REVIEW; REIMBURSEMENT; DEFAULT; SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Annual Review ............................................................................................................ 10 5.2 Reimbursement of Costs ............................................................................................. 10 5.3 Default by Developer .................................................................................................. 10 5.3.1 Default ............................................................................................................ 10 5.3.2 Notice of Default ............................................................................................ 10 5.3.3 Termination for Failure to Cure Default ........................................................ 10 5.3.4 Specific Performance...................................................................................... 10 5.3.5 Damages ......................................................................................................... 11 5.4 Default by City ............................................................................................................ 11 5.4.1 Notice of Default ............................................................................................ 11 6. PUBLIC BENEFITS ............................................................................................................... 11 6.1 Increase in Property Taxes .......................................................................................... 11 6.2 Affordable Housing Payment...................................................................................... 11 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS ...................................................................................................... 12 7.1 Date Agreement Becomes Effective ........................................................................... 12 7.2 Term ............................................................................................................................ 12 7.2.1 Basic Term...................................................................................................... 12 7.2.2 Early Termination of Agreement .................................................................... 12 7.2.3 Automatic Termination of Agreement ........................................................... 12 ii 7.2.4 Effect of Termination ..................................................................................... 12 7.3 Force Majeure: Extension of Time of Performance ................................................... 12 7.4 Applicable Law ........................................................................................................... 13 7.5 Amendments ............................................................................................................... 13 7.6 Assignment ................................................................................................................. 13 7.6.1 Right to Assign ............................................................................................... 13 7.7 Mortgage Rights .......................................................................................................... 14 7.7.1 Encumbrances on the Property and this Agreement ....................................... 14 7.7.2 Mortgagee Protection ..................................................................................... 14 7.7.3 Mortgagee Not Obligated ............................................................................... 14 7.7.4 Notice of Default to Mortgagee: Right of Mortgagee to Cure ...................... 14 7.7.5 Bankruptcy ..................................................................................................... 15 7.7.6 Termination Subject to Mortgagee Rights ..................................................... 15 7.7.7 No Cancellation .............................................................................................. 15 7.7.8 Reserved ......................................................................................................... 15 7.7.9 Separate Agreement........................................................................................ 15 7.7.10 Material Notices ............................................................................................. 15 7.7.11 Mortgagee Right to Assign ............................................................................. 16 7.8 Covenants .................................................................................................................... 16 7.9 Implementation ........................................................................................................... 16 7.10 Relationship of the Parties .......................................................................................... 16 7.11 Cooperation in the Event of Third Party Litigation .................................................... 16 7.12 Notices ........................................................................................................................ 17 7.13 Recordation ................................................................................................................. 17 7.14 Developer Hold Harmless ........................................................................................... 17 7.15 Successors and Assigns ............................................................................................... 18 7.16 Severability ................................................................................................................. 18 7.17 Waiver ......................................................................................................................... 18 7.18 Third Party Beneficiaries ............................................................................................ 18 7.19 Expedited Processing .................................................................................................. 18 7.20 Requests for Payment ................................................................................................. 18 7.21 Entire Agreement ........................................................................................................ 19 7.22 Conflict of Laws ......................................................................................................... 19 7.23 Legal Advice; Neutral Interpretation; Headings and Table of Contents..................... 19 7.24 Counterparts ................................................................................................................ 19 7.25 Organization and Standing of Developer .................................................................... 19 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. _________ BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND _________ THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. _________ (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of this _____ day of ________ 2021 (the “Date of Agreement”), by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a charter city and a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of California (“City”), and __________________, __________ (“Developer”), pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 65867 of the California Government Code, and the general authority set forth in section 65864 et seq. of the Government Code (the “Development Agreement Act”), the City’s inherent power as a charter city, and the Development Agreement Act implementing procedures adopted by the City in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”). The definitions contained in Section 1 shall apply to the entire Agreement, including the following RECITALS. RECITALS A. Developer has proposed development of the Project, as defined below and depicted on the Site Map (Exhibit A to this Agreement). B. The City and Developer recognize that development of the Project will provide redevelopment of a commercial area with much needed housing for the City and the region; and C. The Project will provide a Mid Density residential development, which will provide new General Fund revenues intended to offset incremental City costs associated with such uses; and D. The Project will provide development fees which will provide City-wide benefits, certain public infrastructure, private parking and amenities needed to support the Project, as well as funding for off-site affordable housing programs and projects; and E. Developer, in consideration of City entering into this Agreement and of the benefits and opportunities provided to Developer by the Existing Approvals and the cooperation and assistance of the City in connection therewith, agrees to pay to City the “Affordable Housing Payment” (as defined below) and will further provide assurances to the City that the public infrastructure, amenities and design features of the Project are implemented in a timely manner as set forth in the Existing Approvals and; F. In order to provide certainty and render development of the Project more feasible in light of the large capital investment and time necessary to coordinate and implement the Project, Developer requires assurance from the City that the land use entitlements in the Existing Approvals shall, to the extent specified herein, not be amended or supplemented; and G. Developer also recognizes and agrees that in extending these benefits to Developer, the City must retain the Reserved Powers; and H. Concurrently with or prior to approval of this Agreement, the City has approved the following other Project Approvals applicable to the Project, which are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Existing Approvals”: 2 1) General Plan Amendment No. 2021-00536; 2) Zoning Reclassification No. 2021-00336; 3) Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06097; and 4) Tentative Tract Map No.19141. I. City and Developer desire to enter into this Agreement to provide for the Affordable Housing Payment and to assure development of the Property in accordance with the Existing Approvals and provide for vesting of same for the Term of the Agreement, to assure the City of installation of the public infrastructure, including parking facilities, amenities and design features of the Project in accordance herewith and as described in the Existing Approvals; and J. On ______________, 2022, the Planning Commission, held a duly noticed public hearing regarding this Agreement and environmental documentation related thereto, and at the conclusion of such hearing, and after consideration of evidence and testimony submitted by City staff, the Developer and all interested parties, adopted a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Agreement; and K. The City hereby finds that this Agreement and the Existing Approvals are consistent with the City’s General Plan and the Anaheim Municipal Code, and that the MND satisfies all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State CEQA Guidelines with respect to this Agreement and the Project; and L. On ______________, 2022, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing regarding this Agreement and, at the conclusion of the hearing, and after considering the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the evidence and testimony submitted by City staff, the Developer and all other interested parties, introduced Ordinance No. _____ approving this Agreement on ______________, 2022, and adopted Ordinance No. _____ authorizing execution of this Agreement on ______________, 2022 (the “Authorizing Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, for the foregoing reasons, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual promises and covenants herein contained and other valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1 “Affordable Housing Payment” means payments to be made by Developer to City as set forth in Section 6.2 of this Agreement. 1.2 “AMC” means the Anaheim Municipal Code. 1.3 “Annual Review” means the annual review process as described in Section 5.1 of this Agreement. 1.4 “Applicable Rules” means (subject to the qualifications set forth herein with respect to Fees and excluding the Reserved Powers) the rules, regulations, ordinances and officially adopted 3 plans and policies of the City in force as of the Effective Date governing the use and development of real property and which, among other matters, govern the permitted uses of land, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, parking requirements, setbacks, development standards, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes, and the design improvements applicable to the development of the Property, including without limitation, the Existing Approvals. 1.5 “CEQA” means the California Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.), the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code of Regs., Title 14, section 15000 et seq.) and City CEQA Guidelines. 1.6 “City Agency” means each and every agency, department, board, Commission, authority, employee, and/or official acting under the authority of the City that have permit, entitlement or approval authority or jurisdiction over the Project, including, without limitation, the City Council and the Planning Commission. 1.7 “City Attorney” means the City Attorney of the City. 1.8 “City Council” means the City Council of the City. 1.9 “City Manager” means the City Manager of the City. 1.10 “Conditions of Approval” means those conditions of approval for the Project adopted in connection with the granting of the Existing Approvals. 1.11 “Discretionary Action” means an action which requires the exercise of judgment, deliberation or a decision on the part of the City and/or any City Agency in the process of approving or disapproving a particular activity, as distinguished from Ministerial Permits and Approvals, as defined below, and any other activity which merely requires the City and/or any City Agency to determine whether there has been compliance with statutes, ordinances or regulations. Discretionary Actions shall not include any Ministerial Permits and Approvals. 1.12 “Effective Date” means the effective date of the Authorizing Ordinance. 1.13 “Existing Approvals” means those approvals described in Recital H. 1.14 “Fees” means any fees or charges imposed or collected by the City as of the Effective Date other than (i) Impact Fees, Processing Fees and Charges and (ii) fees collected and/or imposed by the City for the benefit of public agencies other than the City. 1.15 “General Plan” means the General Plan of the City. 1.16 “Housing Fund” means that certain fund created and maintained by City pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 2018-106. 1.17 “Impact Fees” means impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, fair share charges or other similar impact fees or charges imposed on and in connection with new development on a city-wide basis by the City pursuant to rules, regulations, ordinances and policies of the City in full force and effect as of the Effective Date. Impact Fees shall not include Processing Fees and Charges, the Affordable Housing Payment, taxes or special assessments. 4 1.18 “Inspections” means all field inspections and reviews by City officials during the course of construction of the Project and the processing of certificates of occupancy (permanent or temporary). 1.19 “Institutional Lender” means any of the following institutions having assets or deposits in the aggregate of not less than One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000.00): a California chartered bank; a bank created and operated under and pursuant to the laws of the United States of America; an “incorporated admitted insurer” (as that term is used in Section 1100.1 of the California Insurance Code); a “foreign (other state) bank” (as that term is defined in Section 1700(1) of the California Financial Code); a federal savings and loan association (Cal. Fin. Code Section 8600); a commercial finance lender (within the meaning of Sections 2600 et seq. of the California Financial Code); a “foreign (other nation) bank” provided it is licensed to maintain an office in California, is licensed or otherwise authorized by another state to maintain an agency or branch office in that state, or maintains a federal agency or federal branch in any state (Section 1716 of the California Financial Code); a bank holding company or a subsidiary of a bank holding company which is not a bank (Section 3707 of the California Financial Code); a trust company, savings and loan association, insurance company, investment banker; college or university; pension or retirement fund or system, either governmental or private, or any pension or retirement fund or system of which any of the foregoing shall be trustee, provided the same be organized under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof; and a Real Estate Investment Trust, as defined in Section 856 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, provided such trust is listed on either the American Stock Exchange or the New York Stock Exchange. 1.20 “Key People” means Scott Homan 1.21 “Legal Description” means the legal description of the Property attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference. 1.22 “Litigation” means any lawsuit (including a cross-action) filed against the City and/or Developer which challenges the validity, implementation or enforcement of, or seeks any other remedy directly relating to, all or any part of the Existing Approvals or this Agreement. 1.23 “MND” means the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Project. 1.24 “Ministerial Permits and Approvals” means the nondiscretionary permits, approvals, plans, inspections, certificates, documents and licenses required to be taken, issued or approved by the City in order for Developer to implement, develop and construct the Project and the Mitigation Measures, including without limitation, building permits, and other similar permits and approvals. 1.25 “Mitigation Measures” means those Mitigation Measures set forth in that certain Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. ___ for the Project. 1.26 “Mortgage” means an instrument or instruments securing one or more financings by the Developer with respect to the construction, development, use or operation of the Project, and includes whatever security instruments are used in the locale of the Project, including, without limitation, mortgages, deeds of trust, security deeds, and conditional deeds, as well as financing statements, security agreements and other documents required pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code. 5 1.27 “Mortgagee” means one or more Institutional Lenders holding a beneficial interest and secured position under any Mortgage which have notified City, in writing, of its request for notice under the provision of Section 7.7 hereof. 1.28 “Official Records” means the Official Records of Orange County, California. 1.29 “Parties” means collectively the Developer and the City. 1.30 “Party” means any one of the Developer or the City. 1.31 “Plaintiff’ means any party seeking relief or compensation through Litigation, whether as plaintiff, petitioner, cross-complainant or otherwise. 1.32 “Planning Commission” means the Planning Commission of the City. 1.33 “Planning Director” means the Planning and Building Director of the City. 1.34 “Processing Fees and Charges” means all processing fees and charges required by the City including, but not limited to, fees and charges for land use applications, Project permits, building applications, building permits, grading permits, encroachment permits, tract or parcel maps, lot line adjustments, air right lots, street vacations, certificates of occupancy and other similar permits. 1.35 “Project” means the development on the Property of 112 residential townhomes (for- sale) units with approximately 65,840 square feet of resident amenity space, approximately 3,413, as more specifically described in the Existing Approvals and as shown on the Site Map. 1.36 “Project Architect” means the architect designated by the Developer as responsible for the design and construction supervision of the Project. 1.37 “Property” means that real property Developer owns, which is legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto. 1.38 “Public Improvements” means the facilities to be improved, constructed and dedicated to (and, upon completion in accordance with this Agreement, accepted by) the City by the Developer. Public Improvements include sidewalks, all public utilities within the streets (such as electricity and water, but excluding any non-municipal utilities), paths in the public right-of-way, off-site intersection improvements (including but not limited to curbs, curb ramps, medians, signaling, traffic controls devices, signage, and striping), and all other improvements delineated on street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer for the Project during the pendency of the Project. 1.39 “Reserved Powers” means the rights and authority excepted from this Agreement’s restrictions on the City’s police powers which are reserved to the City, including without limitation the establishment of new fees and, commencing with the fourth (4th) anniversary of the Effective Date, applying the then-applicable Impact Fees adopted by the City to the Project. The Reserved Powers supersede the Applicable Rules to the extent of any inconsistency and include the power to enact and implement rules, regulations, ordinances and policies after the Effective Date that may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules, which: (1) prevent or remedy conditions which the City has found to be injurious or detrimental to the public health or safety and are generally applicable on a City-wide basis; (2) are Uniform Codes; (3) are necessary to comply with state and federal laws, rules and regulations (whether enacted previous or subsequent to the Effective Date) as provided in Section 3.2.2.3, or to 6 comply with a court order or judgment of a state or federal court; (4) are agreed to or consented to by Developer; (5) involve the formation of assessment districts, Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts, special districts, maintenance districts or other similar districts formed in accordance with applicable laws provided, however, that Developer shall retain all its rights with respect to such districts pursuant to all applicable laws; or (6) are Processing Fees and Charges. 1.40 “Section” means the indicated section or subsection number of this Agreement. 1.41 “Site Map” means the map of the Property which is attached thereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 1.42 “Term” means the period of time during which this Agreement shall be in effect and shall bind the City and Developer as provided in Section 7.2 of this Agreement. 1.43 “Transfer” means: (i) a sale of the Property, portion thereof, or interest therein (excepting to another entity directly or beneficially owned by Developer or of which Developer is the manager or general partner, and excluding any portion of the Property dedicated to City in connection with the implementation of development of the Property as well as the granting of normal and customary utility easements); (ii) a ground lease of the Property or portion thereof; or (iii) the change in the Developer eliminating one or more of the Key People. 1.44 “Uniform Codes” means those building, electrical, mechanical, fire and other similar regulations which are applicable throughout the City, including, but not limited to, the California Building Standards Codes, as adopted by the City Council and codified in Chapter 15.03 (Building Standards Codes and Administrative Provisions Pertaining to Building and Construction) of Title 15 (Buildings and Housing) of the AMC, and the California Fire Code, as adopted by the City Council and codified in Chapter 16.08 (California Fire Code) of Title 16 (Fire) of the AMC, as the same may be amended from time to time by the City. 2. PROPERTY, PURPOSE AND INTENT. 2.1 Property Description. The Property is shown on the Site Map and described in the Legal Description. 2.2 City Objectives. The City desires that the Property be developed as provided for in the Existing Approvals to: (i) provide for the payment by the Developer to the City of the Affordable Housing Payment, (ii) provide a fully integrated and coordinated development based on comprehensive planning principles; and (iii) to the extent Developer proceeds with the Project, to assure that the Project will be developed as described in the Existing Approvals. The City further desires to encourage the generation of private payments to the Housing Fund, including without limitation the payment by the Developer of the Affordable Housing Payment. 2.3 Developer Objectives. This Agreement is necessary to assure Developer that (i) the Project will not be reduced in density, intensity or use; and (ii) the Project will not be subjected to new rules, regulations, ordinances, or official policies or delays which are not permitted by this Agreement. 2.4 Mutual Objectives. Development of the Project in accordance with this Agreement will provide the assurances required for the development of the Project in accordance with the goals and objectives set forth in the General Plan. Moreover, this Agreement provides additional assurance 7 to the City and Developer that, should Developer proceed with the Project, the installation of necessary improvements will occur in the manner set forth in the Existing Approvals and otherwise achieve the goals and purposes for which the Development Agreement Act was enacted. The Parties believe that such an orderly, coordinated development of the Project will provide many public benefits to the City, including without limitation: delivery by the Developer to the City of the Affordable Housing Payment, and development of under-utilized properties and uses. 3. AGREEMENT AND ASSURANCES. 3.1 Agreement and Assurance on the Part of Developer. In consideration for the City entering into this Agreement, and as an inducement for the City to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in order to effectuate the purposes and intentions set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement, should Developer proceed with the Project, Developer hereby agrees to (i) develop the Project consistent with the Existing Approvals, subject to 3.2.6 of this Agreement and Force Majeure; and (ii) deliver to the City the Affordable Housing Payment, by the time set forth therefor in Section 6.2 of this Agreement. 3.2 Agreement and Assurances on the Part of the City. In consideration for Developer entering into this Agreement and delivery of the Affordable Housing Payment and provision of other public benefits, as further set forth in Section 6 below, and as an inducement for Developer to obligate itself to carry out the covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the City hereby agrees during the term as follows: 3.2.1 Entitlement to Develop. Developer has a vested right to develop the Project in accordance with the Existing Approvals subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Applicable Rules and the Reserved Powers. City shall not revoke or modify the Existing Approvals. Developer’s vested rights under this Agreement shall include, without limitation, the right to remodel, renovate, rehabilitate, redevelop, rebuild or replace the Project or any portion thereof throughout the applicable Term for any reason, including, without limitation, in the event of damage, destruction or obsolescence of the Project or any portion thereof, subject to the Applicable Rules, Existing Approvals and Reserved Powers, provided that Developer shall have paid to City not less than Thirty-Four Thousand Dollars ($34,000.00) as the Affordable Housing Payment. 3.2.2 Changes in Applicable Rules. 3.2.2.1 Non-Application of Changes in Applicable Rules. Any change in, or addition to, the Applicable Rules, including, without limitation, any change in any applicable general or specific plan, zoning ordinance or building regulation adopted or becoming effective after the Effective Date, including, without limitation, any such change by means or ordinance, City Charter amendment, initiative, referendum, resolution, motion, policy, order or moratorium, initiated or instituted for any reason whatsoever and adopted by the City Council, Planning Commission or City Agency, or by the electorate, as the case may be, which would, absent this Agreement, otherwise be applicable to the Project and which would conflict with the Applicable Rules, Existing Approvals or this Agreement, shall not be applied to the Project unless such changes represent an exercise of the City’s Reserved Powers or are otherwise expressly allowed by this Agreement or consented to in writing by Developer. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Agreement and the Applicable Rules, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. 8 3.2.2.2 Changes in Uniform Code. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, construction of the Project shall comply with changes occurring from time to time in the Uniform Codes pursuant to the Reserved Powers. 3.2.2.3 Changes Mandated by Federal or State Law. This Agreement shall not preclude the application to the Project of changes in, or additions to, the Applicable Rules. In the event state or federal laws or regulations prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, such provisions shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such state or federal laws or regulations. 3.2.2.4 Special Taxes and Assessments. Developer shall have the right, to the extent permitted by law, to protest, oppose and vote against any and all special taxes, assessments, levies, charges and/or fees imposed with respect to any assessment districts, Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts, maintenance districts or other similar districts which would include the Property or the Project. 3.2.3 Agreed Changes and Other Reserved Powers. This Agreement shall not preclude application to the Project of rules, regulations, ordinances and officially adopted plans and policies otherwise in conflict with the Applicable Rules if (i) agreed to in writing by Developer, or (ii) result from the Reserved Powers. City agrees that Developer may, in its sole discretion, give the City written notice of its election to have any subsequent change in the Applicable Rules applied to some portion or all of the Project or the Property as it may own, in which case such subsequent changes in the Applicable Rules shall be deemed to be contained within the Applicable Rules insofar as that portion of the Property is concerned. 3.2.4 Subsequent Development. The City shall not require Developer to obtain any approvals or permits for the development of the Project other than those permits or approvals which are required by the Applicable Rules or the Reserved Powers. 3.2.5 Effective Development Standards. The City agrees that with respect to the Project it is bound to permit development of the Project in accordance with the Existing Approvals including without limitation, the uses, intensity and density as permitted by the Existing Approvals, subject to the Applicable Rules, Reserved Powers and this Agreement. Moreover, the City hereby agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold any Discretionary Action which must be issued by the City in order for the Project to proceed, provided that Developer reasonably and satisfactorily complies with all City-wide standard procedures and policies of the City for processing any such Discretionary Action and pays any applicable Processing Fees and Charges. The City shall accept and timely process, in the normal manner for processing such matters as may then be applicable, all applications for further approvals with respect to the Project called for or required under this Agreement, 3.2.6 Timing and Sequencing of Development. Developer anticipates that the Project will be completed in three construction phases, including all general grading, site preparation, utility lines and infrastructure, and residential construction. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement or the AMC, the Parties expressly agree that there is no requirement that Developer initiate or complete development of the Project or any particular phase of the Project within any particular period of time, and City shall not impose such a requirement on any of the Existing Approvals. The Parties acknowledge that Developer cannot at this time predict when or the rate at which the Property will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Developer, such as market demand, interest rates, competition and other similar factors. Because the 9 California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 455, that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the Parties’ intent to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that Developer shall have the right to develop the Property, or to not develop the Property, in such order and such rate and at such time as Developer deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment in its sole and absolute discretion; provided, however, that upon commencement of any work related to the development or construction of the Project, or any portion thereof, the Developer shall diligently prosecute the same to completion without substantial interruption in accordance with applicable permits and requirements under this Agreement, subject to Force Majeure. In the event an ordinance, resolution or other measure, referendum, or initiative is enacted, whether by action of the City or otherwise, which relates to the rate, amount, timing, or sequencing of the development or construction of the Project on all or any part of the Property or the implementation or construction of the Mitigation Measures, City agrees, to the maximum extent permitted by law, that such ordinance, resolution or other measure shall not apply to the Project, the Property or this Agreement, unless such changes are adopted pursuant to the City’s exercise of its Reserved Powers or other applicable provisions of this Agreement. 3.3 Processing Fees; Extraordinary Processing Consultant Charges and Environmental Review. 3.3.1 Processing Fees and Charges. Developer shall pay all Processing Fees and Charges for Ministerial Permits and Approvals and Inspections at the rate in effect at the time they are sought. 3.3.2 Environmental Review. In compliance with CEQA, the City has conducted an environmental review of the Project and has adopted the MND and Mitigation Measures. The City intends that Ministerial Permits and Approvals are not actions subject to requirements for further environmental review pursuant to CEQA. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLAN. 4.1 Vested Right to Develop Property. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Developer shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to receive the benefits set forth and provided in, the Existing Approvals. In the absence of a default by Developer, City shall not revoke, rescind, impede or thwart any of the Existing Approvals or this Agreement. 5. ANNUAL REVIEW; REIMBURSEMENT; DEFAULT; SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. 5.1 Annual Review. During the Term and so long as this Agreement is in effect, Developer shall initiate and the City shall conduct an Annual Review of Developer’s compliance with this Agreement and the Procedures Resolution. Such Annual Review shall be limited in scope to determining good faith compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. The Annual Review shall be initiated and conducted in accordance with the Procedures Resolution. 5.2 Reimbursement of Costs. Developer shall pay to City in advance, the Application Fee for Annual Review required by the City’s Procedures Resolution on each occasion that Developer submits its evidence for the Annual Review. Developer shall also reimburse the City for its actual costs, reasonably and necessarily incurred or any legal or financing consultant cost necessary to 10 accomplish review of amendments pursuant to Section 7.5 of this Agreement. Such reimbursement shall be due within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice from the City. 5.3 Default by Developer. 5.3.1 Default. In the event the City reasonably determines that Developer has failed to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement, or that any such obligations are not performed in a timely manner, the City may pursue only those remedies expressly provided for in this Agreement; provided, however, that the City’s right to compel specific performance of the obligations of Developer under this Agreement shall be subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.3.4. Further, the City shall have no right to monetary damages except as set forth in Section 5.3.5. 5.3.2 Notice of Default. In the event the City reasonably determines that Developer is in default of any of its obligations under this Agreement, the City shall send a notice of such alleged default(s) to Developer in which the allegations of default shall be set forth in sufficient detail to enable Developer to ascertain the specific actions necessary to cure the alleged default(s). Upon receipt of a notice of default, Developer shall promptly commence to cure the identified default(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of such notice but in no event more than thirty (30) days after receipt of notice and shall complete the cure of (i) any monetary default(s) not later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of such notice of default, and (ii) any non-monetary default(s) not later than ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice of default or such longer period as necessary to cure default as agreed to by City in its sole discretion. The Parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the time periods set forth in this Section. 5.3.3 Termination for Failure to Cure Default. If after the cure period provided for in Section 5.3.2 has lapsed and the Planning Director reasonably finds and determines that Developer remains in default, the Planning Director shall make a report to the City Council concerning such default and the City Council may thereafter proceed to modify or terminate this Agreement in accordance with the Procedures set forth in Sections 7.2 and 7.3 of the Procedures Resolution. 5.3.4 Specific Performance. Except as provided in this Section 5.3.4, the City shall have no right under this Agreement to seek a remedy of specific performance with respect to the Project in the event of an abandonment of the Project. In in the interest of public safety and the valid exercise of its police power, the Parties agree that the City has the right to direct Developer, at the election of the City in its sole discretion, to complete or make safe and secure any uncompleted improvements located on the Property with the choice of whether to demolish, complete or secure such improvements and the method of such demolition, completion and securing of such improvements to be selected by Developer in its sole discretion. Nothing in this Section 5.3.4 shall limit the City’s enforcement of all applicable provisions of the Applicable Rules, Existing Approvals, Mitigation Measures, and Uniform Code for any portion of the Project then or thereafter constructed (e.g., requiring Developer to build sewer laterals required under Applicable Rules to serve the Project actually completed), termination of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions hereof notwithstanding. 5.3.5 Damages. The City shall have the right to recover damages equal to the amount to the required Affordable Housing Payment to the extent less than all of the Affordable Housing Payment of Thrity-four Thousand Dollars ($34,000.00) has been received by City from Developer. Any damage remedy of Developer against City shall be limited to the amount of actual damages sustained by Developer and caused by wrongful actions of City, but in no event to exceed the amounts theretofore paid by Developer to City as the Affordable Housing Payment. 11 5.4 Default by City. 5.4.1 Notice of Default. In the event the Developer reasonably determines that the City is in default of any of its obligations under this Agreement, the Developer shall send a notice of such alleged default(s) to the City in which the allegations of default shall be set forth in sufficient detail to enable the City to ascertain the specific actions necessary to cure the alleged default(s). Upon receipt of written notice of default from Developer, the City shall promptly commence to cure the identified default(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of the notice of default and shall complete the cure of such default(s) not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice of default or such longer period as necessary to cure default as agreed to by the Developer in its sole discretion. The Parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the time periods set forth in this Section. Developer shall have all rights and remedies provided herein or by applicable law, which shall include but not be limited to compelling the specific performance of the City’s obligations under this Agreement provided that Developer, as the case may be, has first complied with the notice procedures in this Section. No part of this Agreement shall be deemed to abrogate or limit any immunities or defenses the City may otherwise have with respect to claims for monetary damages. 6. PUBLIC BENEFITS. 6.1 Increase in Property Taxes. The Project will generate significant additional property taxes. 6.2 Affordable Housing Payment. The Affordable Housing Payment is due as of the sixtieth (60th) day after the Date of Agreement; provided that, at its election, Developer may make payments in two installments as follows: (i) an initial payment, which shall be in the amount of Seventeen Thousand Dollars ($17,000.00) shall be paid by Developer to City on or before the first to occur of: (a) the issuance of a precise grading permit as to all or any portion of the Property; (b) the commencement of grading activity on all or any portion of the Property; (c) the issuance of a building permit for construction on all or any portion of the Property; (d) the commencement of construction on the Property or any portion thereof; or (e) a Transfer of the Property or portion thereof; and (ii) a second payment, which shall be in the amount of Seventeen Thousand Dollars ($17,000.00) shall be paid by Developer to City on or before the first to occur of: (a) the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for improvements to the Property or any portion thereof; (b) the issuance by City, at its election, of a temporary certificate of occupancy for improvements to the Property or any portion thereof; or (c) a Transfer of the Property or any portion thereof. Execution and recording of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a lien in favor of City (as beneficiary), with rights to enforce collection, as to the Affordable Housing Payment. Upon receipt by City of the Affordable Housing Payment, City will cause such Affordable Housing Payment to be kept in the Housing Fund until used by the City for purposes consistent with City Resolution No. 2018-106; provided that the manner in which the City deploys moneys in the Housing Fund is not a matter of concern to the Developer. 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 7.1 Date Agreement Becomes Effective. This Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date. 12 7.2 Term. 7.2.1 Basic Term. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and shall extend, modified for a period of seven (7) years after the Effective Date, unless extended or earlier terminated as provided herein. City delegates authority to the City Planning Commission to extend the Term, at its election, for an additional period of up to three (3) years after the initial seven (7) year term. Following the expiration or termination of this Term, this Agreement shall terminate and be of no further force and effect. 7.2.2 Early Termination of Agreement. This Agreement is terminable: (i) by mutual written agreement of the Parties; or (ii) by either Party following an uncured default by the other Party under this Agreement, subject to the procedures and limitations set forth in this Agreement; or (iii) upon the occurrence of the entry of a final judgment or issuance of a final order, after all appeals have been exhausted, directed to the City as a result of any lawsuit filed against the City to set aside, withdraw or abrogate the approval of the City Council of this Agreement; or (iv) if termination occurs pursuant to the provisions of the Procedures Resolution and such termination is so intended thereby. 7.2.3 Automatic Termination of Agreement. If not already terminated by reason of any other provision in this Agreement, or for any other reason, this Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect upon completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and any further amendments thereto and the issuance of all occupancy permits and acceptance by the City of all dedications and improvements as required by the development of the Project. 7.2.4 Effect of Termination. Following expiration of the Term, early termination pursuant to Section 7.2.2 above, or automatic termination pursuant to Section 7.2.3, this Agreement shall be of no further force and effect, except for any provisions which, by their express terms, survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7.3 Force Majeure: Extension of Time of Performance. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, whenever a period of time is designated within which either Party hereto is required to do or complete any act, matter or thing, both the time for the doing or completion thereof and the Term of this Agreement and the specific obligation hereunder shall be extended by a period of time equal to the number of days which such Party is prevented from, or is unreasonably interfered with the doing or completion of such act, matter or thing because of the following causes, which causes are beyond the reasonable control of the Party to be excused including: war, terrorist acts, insurrection; strikes; walk-outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; unavoidable casualties; acts of God; epidemics, pandemics; Litigation and administrative proceedings which are brought against the Project by a third party (not including any administrative proceedings contemplated by this Agreement in the normal course of affairs such as the Annual Review); restrictions imposed or mandated by other governmental entities (“Governmental Restrictions”); enactment of conflicting state or federal laws or regulations (“Conflicting Laws”); or similar bases for excused performance which is not within the reasonable control of the Party to be excused (financial inability excepted). This Section shall not be applicable to, bankruptcy or receivership initiated by or on behalf of Developer or, if not dismissed within ninety (90) days, by any third parties against Developer. A Party wishing to invoke this Section shall notify in writing the other Party of that intention within thirty (30) days of the commencement of any such cause for delay and shall, at that time, specify the reasons therefor, the provisions of this Agreement that will be delayed as a result, and the period of such extension, if known, or, if not known, the party’s best estimate thereof. The failure to so notify the other Party within that period as to the cause for 13 delay shall constitute a waiver of any right to later rely upon this Section with respect to that cause. In the event any such extension continues for more than one hundred eighty (180) days, any Party not then in Default of its obligations hereunder, shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other and, in that event, the Parties shall have no further obligations hereunder. 7.4 Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and the venue for any legal actions brought by any Party with respect to this Agreement shall be the County of Orange, State of California, for state actions, and the Orange County Division of the Central District of California for any federal actions. 7.5 Amendments. This Agreement may be amended from time to time in writing in accordance with Government Code section 65868 and the Procedures Resolution. 7.6 Assignment. 7.6.1 Right to Assign. Provided that Developer has made all payments required to be made as of such time pursuant to Section 6.2, Developer shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer this Agreement, and any and all of its rights, duties and obligations hereunder, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement, provided that any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer must be pursuant to a sale, assignment or other transfer of the interest of Developer in the Property (or a portion thereof), which, prior to Developer’s acquisition of fee title to the Property shall mean and refer to Developer’s equitable interest in the Property. In the event of any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, (a) Developer shall notify the City of such event and the name of the transferee, together with the corresponding entitlements being transferred to such transferee and (b) the agreement between Developer and such transferee shall provide that the transferee shall be liable for the performance of all obligations of Developer pursuant to this Agreement and the Existing Approvals with respect to Developer’s interest in the Property (or portion thereof) so transferred. Upon the express written assumption of any and all of the obligations of Developer under this Agreement by such transferee, the transfer shall, without any act of or concurrence by the City, relieve Developer of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Agreement with respect to Developer’s interest in the Property (or portion thereof), so transferred, except to the extent Developer is in default under the terms of this Agreement. Any transaction of activity that constitutes a Transfer shall be subject to the remaining provisions of this Agreement, including without limitation Section 6.2. 7.7 Mortgage Rights. 7.7.1 Encumbrances on the Property and this Agreement. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Developer, in any manner, at Developer’s sole and absolute discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvements thereon with any Mortgage. Developer is hereby given the express right, in addition to any other rights herein granted, to grant a Mortgage on its interests in this Agreement or any part or parts thereof, under one or more Mortgages and to assign this Agreement as collateral security for any such Mortgage. 7.7.2 Mortgagee Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior to the lien of any Mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value, and any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof, or to this Agreement, by a Mortgagee (whether pursuant to foreclosure, lease termination or 14 otherwise) shall upon written election by the Mortgagee within sixty (60) days after receipt of such right, title or interest, be subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any such Mortgagee who takes title to the Property or any portion thereof, or to this Agreement, shall also be entitled to the rights and obligations arising under this Agreement. 7.7.3 Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.7, a Mortgagee will not have any rights, obligations or duties pursuant to the terms set forth in this Agreement to perform the obligations of Developer or other affirmative covenants of Developer hereunder or to guarantee such performance, unless such Mortgagee expressly assumes the rights and obligations of the Developer and except that (i) the Mortgagee shall upon written election by the Mortgagee within sixty (60) days after receipt of such right, title or interest, have no right to develop the Project without fully complying with the terms of this Agreement, and (ii) to the extent that any covenant to be performed by Developer is a condition to the performance of any covenant by the City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to the City’s performance hereunder. Although not obligated to do so, upon written election by the Mortgagee within sixty (60) days after receipt of such right, title or interest, any Mortgagee may do any act or thing required by Developer hereunder, and do any act or thing which may be necessary and properly done in the performance and observance of the agreements, covenants and conditions hereof to prevent termination of this Agreement in accordance with Section 7.7.4. Any Mortgagee and its agents and contractors shall have full access to the Property for purposes of accomplishing any of the foregoing. Any of the foregoing done by any Mortgagee shall be as effective to prevent a termination of this Agreement as if the same would have been done by the Developer. 7.7.4 Notice of Default to Mortgagee: Right of Mortgagee to Cure. Each Mortgagee shall, upon written request to City be entitled to receive written notice from the City of the result of the Annual Review and of any default by Developer of its obligations set forth in this Agreement simultaneously with the delivery of such notices to the Developer. Each Mortgagee shall have the right, but not an obligation, to cure such default within ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice or, if such default can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession of the Property, such Mortgagee shall have the right to seek or obtain possession with diligence and continuity through a receiver or otherwise, and to remedy or cure such default within ninety (90) days after obtaining possession, and, except in case of emergency or to protect the public health or safety as determined by the City in its reasonable discretion, City may not exercise any of its remedies set forth in this Agreement until expiration of such ninety (90) day period whether commencing upon receipt of notice or upon obtaining possession of the interests covered by a Mortgage, as applicable; provided, however, that in the case of a default which cannot with diligence be remedied or cured or the remedy or cure of which cannot be commenced within such ninety (90) day period, the Mortgagee shall have such additional time as is reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default. Any notice of termination delivered in violation of this Section 7.7.4 shall be rendered void. In any case where, sixty (60) days after receipt by the Mortgagee of the notice of the Developer’s default, the holder of any Mortgage creating a lien or encumbrance upon the Property, or any part thereof, has not exercised the option to cure, or, if it has exercised the option, is not proceeding diligently with the cure, the City may proceed with termination of this Agreement and any further obligations of City hereunder. 7.7.5 Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 7.7, if any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof by any injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving Developer, the times specified in Section 7.7.4 for commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall 15 be extended for the period of the prohibition. In addition, if this Agreement is rejected or otherwise terminated in connection with any such proceeding, then upon the request of any mortgagee, a new development agreement upon the same terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement may be entered into between such Mortgagee and City. 7.7.6 Termination Subject to Mortgagee Rights. All rights of the City to terminate this Agreement, vis-a-vis the Mortgagee, as a result of the occurrence of any default shall be subject to, and conditioned upon, the City having first given to each Mortgagee written notice of the default as required under Section 7.7.4 above, and all Mortgagees having failed to remedy such default or acquire Developer’s interests hereunder, or having failed to commence foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof as set forth in Section 7.7.4 above. 7.7.7 No Cancellation. There shall be no cancellation, surrender or modification of this Agreement by joint action of the Parties without a minimum of ninety (90) days prior written notice to each Mortgagee who has requested such notice. 7.7.8 Reserved. 7.7.9 Separate Agreement. The City shall, upon request, execute, acknowledge and deliver to each Mortgagee an agreement prepared at the sole cost and expense of the Developer (including related legal fees incurred by the City), in form satisfactory to each Mortgagee and City, between City, Developer and the Mortgagee(s), confirming all of the provisions hereof and/or such other documents containing terms and provisions customarily required by Institutional Lenders in connection with such financing, provided, however, the City shall not be obligated to approve any terms that would impair or adversely affect the rights and obligations of the City, or otherwise amend this Agreement and/or the obligations of the Developer as set forth in this Agreement 7.7.10 Material Notices. The Developer shall give all Mortgagees notice of any Litigation and the parties hereby consent to intervention in such Litigation by the Mortgagee. In the event any Mortgagee shall not elect to intervene or become a party to the proceedings, such Mortgagee shall be provided notice and a copy of any award or decision made in connection therewith. 7.7.11 Mortgagee Right to Assign. Foreclosure of any Mortgage, or any sale thereunder, whether by judicial proceedings or by virtue of any power contained in the Mortgage, or any conveyance of the interest of Developer hereunder to any Mortgagee or its designee through, or in lieu of, foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof, shall not require the consent of the City or constitute a breach of any provision of or a default under this Agreement; and upon such foreclosure, sale or conveyance, the City will recognize the purchaser or other transferee in connection therewith as the Developer hereunder, provided that City has received full payment of Thirty-Four Thousand Dollars ($34,000.00) as the Affordable Housing Payment. 7.8 Covenants. The provisions of this Agreement shall constitute covenants which run with the land comprising the Property for the benefit thereof and as a burden thereon, and the burdens and benefits hereof shall bind and inure to the benefit of all assignees, transferees and successors to the parties. 7.9 Implementation. Upon satisfactory completion by Developer of all required applications and payment of applicable Processing Fees and Charges, including the fee for processing this Agreement, if Developer proceeds with the Project, the City and Developer shall commence and 16 diligently process all required steps necessary for the implementation of this Agreement and development of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Developer shall, in a timely manner, provide the City with all documents, plans and other information necessary for the City to carry out its processing obligations hereunder. 7.10 Relationship of the Parties. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither Party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each Party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. The only relationship between the City and the Developer is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private property. Further, the City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form of joint venture or partnership between them and agree that nothing herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City and Developer joint venturers or partners. 7.11 Cooperation in the Event of Third Party Litigation. In the event legal action is instituted by a third party, including any other governmental entity or official challenging the validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement, or the Existing Approvals vested pursuant to this Agreement, other actions taken pursuant to CEQA, or any other action by either Party in properly performing hereunder, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate with each other in defending said action and the validity of each provision of this Agreement; provided, however, that Developer agrees to and shall defend, indemnify, save and hold the City and its elected and appointed representatives, boards, commissions, offices, agents, employees, consultants and attorney’s (collectively, the “City” in this Section 7.11) harmless from any and all claims, costs and liability, including without limitation, court costs and attorneys’ fees awarded to any party, to the extent they result from any such Litigation, and shall reimburse the City for its actual costs in defense of the action or proceeding, including, but not limited to the time and expenses of the City Attorney’s Office and any consultants. As the indemnifying Party and provided that Developer demonstrates to City, to City’s reasonable satisfaction, that Developer has the financial wherewithal to indemnify the City hereunder at the time of any such Litigation, Developer shall at all times retain final authority and control over all documents to be filed in such Litigation and notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7.11, the City shall be deemed to have waived its rights to be indemnified hereunder if the City settles any Litigation, in whole or in part, or files any documents in such Litigation without Developer’s prior written approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. This section shall survive any judgment invalidating all or any part of this Agreement. The Developer shall be entitled to choose legal counsel to defend against any such legal action and shall pay any attorneys’ fees awarded against the City or the Developer, or both, resulting from any such legal action. The Developer shall be entitled to any award of attorneys’ fees arising out of any such legal action. 7.12 Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between the City and Developer must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested or by overnight courier. If given by registered or certified mail, the same shall be deemed to have been delivered and received on the first to occur of (i) actual receipt by any of the addresses designated below as the Party to whom notices are to be sent, or (ii) five (5) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If personally delivered or delivered by courier, a notice shall be deemed to have been delivered when received by the Party to whom it is addressed. Any Party hereby may at any time, by giving ten (10) day’s written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the address, or any additional address, to which such notice or communication 17 shall be given. Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below: If to City: City Clerk City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor With a copy to: City Attorney City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Blvd., Suite 356 Anaheim, CA 92805 If to Developer: Anaheim 1 Inv, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 3121 Michelson, Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92612 7.13 Recordation. The City’s Clerk shall record a copy of this Agreement with the Registrar-Recorder of Orange County within ten (10) business days following the later to occur of (i) execution by both parties, or (ii) the Effective Date of the Authorizing Ordinance. To the extent that the Property consists of property under Lease by Developer, this Agreement shall encumber only the leasehold interest and shall not constitute an encumbrance upon the estate in fee. 7.14 Developer Hold Harmless. Developer hereby agrees to and shall indemnify, save, hold harmless and defend the City, and its elected and appointed representatives, boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees, consultants and attorneys (collectively, the “City” in this Section 7.14), from any and all claims, costs, and liability of any kind which may arise, directly or indirectly, from any of Developer’s acts or omissions under, related to, or in any respect connected with this Agreement and/or the development, of the Property and/or the Project, and/or Developer’s activities on the Property (or the activities of the Developer’s employees, contractors, subcontractors, agents, representatives, or independent contractors on the Property), including without limitation the construction of the Project. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to mean that Developer shall hold the City harmless and/or defend it to the extent that such claims, costs or liability arise from the negligent acts, or negligent failure to act, on the part of the City. City agrees that it shall fully cooperate with Developer in the defense of any matter in which Developer is defending and/or holding the City harmless and at no cost to City. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement which is or appears to be to the contrary, the obligations set forth herein shall survive the Term, termination or earlier expiration of this Agreement. 7.15 Successors and Assigns. Subject to the limitations on transfer set forth in this Agreement, all of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties, and their respective successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise), assigns and transferees, and all persons or entities acquiring the Property or any portion thereof or any interest therein, whether by sale, operation of law, or in any manner whatsoever. 7.16 Severability. If any provisions, conditions, or covenants of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any circumstances of either Party, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision, condition, or covenant to persons or 18 circumstances other than those as to whom or which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 7.17 Waiver. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought and such waiver refers expressly to the Section containing the waived provision. No waiver of any right or remedy in respect of any occurrence or event shall be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect of any other occurrence or event. 7.18 Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement and this Agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed to benefit or be enforceable by any other persons or entities other than the Parties. 7.19 Expedited Processing. Developer and City agree to cooperate in the expedited processing of any legal action seeking mandamus, specific performance, declaratory relief or injunctive relief, to set court dates at the earliest practicable date(s) and not cause delay in the prosecution/defense of the action, provided such cooperation shall not require any Party to waive any rights. 7.20 Requests for Payment. Except for the Affordable Housing Payment, with respect to any requests by the City for payment of amounts due under this Agreement, Developer retains its right to review any invoices or requests for payments submitted by the City pursuant to this Agreement. Developer shall review and reasonably approve such invoices or requests for payment or shall identify any disputed amounts within thirty (30) days after receipt. At Developer’s request, the City shall provide Developer with reasonable information or back-up materials supporting such invoices or requests for payment at City offices, with reasonable notice, during business hours. In the event of any disputed invoices or requests for payment, Developer shall timely pay all amounts not disputed. 7.21 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the documents, agreements and exhibits referenced herein or attached hereto set forth and contain the entire understandings and agreements of the parties, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein and no testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings, or covenants shall be admissible in any proceedings of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the provisions or conditions of this Agreement. 7.22 Conflict of Laws. With the exception of the Force Majeure provisions set forth in Section 7.3 hereof, it is agreed by the Parties that the obligations and conditions contained in the Applicable Rules, Existing Approvals and Mitigation Measures govern the development of the Property. To the extent that any provisions of this Agreement may conflict with any of the obligations, conditions or mitigations imposed on Developer pursuant to the Existing Approvals and Mitigation Measures, the Existing Approvals and Mitigation Measures shall govern. 7.23 Legal Advice; Neutral Interpretation; Headings and Table of Contents. Each Party has received independent legal advice from its attorneys with respect to the advisability of executing this Agreement and the meaning of the provisions hereof. The provisions of this Agreement shall be construed as to their fair meaning, and not for or against any Party based upon any attribution to such Party as the source of the language in question. The headings and table of contents used in this Agreement are for the convenience of reference only and shall not be used in construing this Agreement. 19 7.24 Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in six duplicate originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. 7.25 Organization and Standing of Developer. Developer is a limited liability company duly organized, qualified and validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, and has all requisite power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. All consents or approvals of Developer’s officers or directors required in connection with the execution and delivery by the Developer of this Agreement will have been obtained and delivered to the City. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures appear on next page.] S-1 143269 / LHM IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written below. “CITY” CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation and charter city By: ATTEST: THERESA BASS, CITY CLERK By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Robert Fabela City Attorney S-2 “DEVELOPER” Anaheim 1 Inv, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: ______________________________ Scott Homan Its: CFO, COO A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) On _____________________________ , before me, _______________________________ , Notary Public, (Print Name of Notary Public) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer ___________________________________________________________ Title(s) ___________________________________________________________ Title Or Type Of Document Partner(s) Limited General Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Other:_____________________________________ Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Number Of Pages ___________________________________________________________ Date Of Documents ___________________________________________________________ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) On _____________________________ , before me, _______________________________ , Notary Public, (Print Name of Notary Public) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer ___________________________________________________________ Title(s) ___________________________________________________________ Title Or Type Of Document Partner(s) Limited General Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Other:_____________________________________ Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Number Of Pages ___________________________________________________________ Date Of Documents ___________________________________________________________ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) On _____________________________ , before me, _______________________________ , Notary Public, (Print Name of Notary Public) personally appeared who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form. CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT Individual Corporate Officer ___________________________________________________________ Title(s) ___________________________________________________________ Title Or Type Of Document Partner(s) Limited General Attorney-In-Fact Trustee(s) Guardian/Conservator Other:_____________________________________ Signer is representing: Name Of Person(s) Or Entity(ies) ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Number Of Pages ___________________________________________________________ Date Of Documents ___________________________________________________________ Signer(s) Other Than Named Above A-1 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, DISTANT NORTH 88° 58' 15" EAST 865.95 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 0° 21' 00" WEST 666.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88° 58' 07" EAST 225.70 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO A POINT SOUTH 88° 58' 07" WEST 230.60 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 0° 18' 10" EAST 666.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING DISTANT SOUTH 88° 58' 15" WEST 1548.50 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88° 58' 15" WEST 225.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ALL OIL, OIL RIGHTS, MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN THAT MAY BE WITHIN OR UNDER THE LAND, TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND OPERATING THEREFOR AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM SAID LAND OR ANY OTHER LAND, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND MINE FROM LAND OTHER THAN THAT HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, OIL OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS, INTO, THROUGH, OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF THE LAND, AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES, WITHOUT, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE AND OPERATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE UPPER 500 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE AS EXCEPTED IN DEED FROM ELIZABETH ANN RALSTON, A MARRIED WOMAN, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS ELIZABETH ANN CARROLL, RECORDED JULY 28, 1960 IN BOOK 5349, PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 2: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 18, DISTANT NORTH 88° 58' 15" EAST 1091.10 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 0° 18' 10" WEST 666.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88° 58' 07" EAST 230.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 0° 08' 25" EAST 666.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88° 58' 15" WEST 228.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT ALL OIL, OIL RIGHTS, MINERALS, MINERAL RIGHTS, NATURAL GAS, NATURAL GAS RIGHTS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBONS BY WHATSOEVER NAME KNOWN THAT MAY BE WITHIN OR UNDER THE LAND TOGETHER WITH THE PERPETUAL RIGHT OF DRILLING, MINING, EXPLORING AND OPERATING THEREFOR AND REMOVING THE SAME FROM SAID LAND OR ANY OTHER LAND, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO WHIPSTOCK OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILL AND MINE FROM LAND OTHER THAN THOSE HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, OIL OR GAS WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS, INTO, THROUGH, OR ACROSS THE SUBSURFACE OF THE LAND, AND TO BOTTOM SUCH WHIPSTOCKED OR DIRECTIONALLY DRILLED WELLS, TUNNELS AND SHAFTS UNDER AND BENEATH OR BEYOND THE EXTERIOR LIMITS THEREOF, AND TO REDRILL, RETUNNEL, EQUIP, MAINTAIN, REPAIR, DEEPEN AND OPERATE ANY SUCH WELLS OR MINES, WITHOUT, HOWEVER, THE RIGHT TO DRILL, MINE, EXPLORE AND OPERATE THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE UPPER 500 FEET OF THE SUBSURFACE AS EXCEPTED IN DEED FROM MORRIS CARROLL, A SINGLE MAN, RECORDED JULY 28, 1960 IN BOOK 5348, PAGE 547 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. APN: 127-051-43 NORTH AMERICA | EUROPE | AFRICA | AUSTRALIA | ASIA WWW.FIRSTCARBONSOLUTIONS.COM DRAFT West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Prepared for: City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.5238 Contact: Andy Uk, Associate Planner Prepared by: FirstCarbon Solutions 250 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92602 714.508.4100 Contact: Glenn Lajoie, AICP, Project Director Cecilia So, Project Manager Report Date: April 29, 2022 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents FirstCarbon Solutions iii Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations .......................................................................................................... vii Section 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 - Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 - Project Location ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 - Environmental Setting ................................................................................................... 1 1.4 - Project Description........................................................................................................ 2 1.5 - Required Discretionary Approvals ................................................................................. 5 1.6 - Intended Uses of this Document ................................................................................... 5 Section 2: Environmental Checklist and Environmental Evaluation ................................................ 23 2.1 Aesthetics .............................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ........................................................................ 27 2.3 Air Quality .............................................................................................................. 30 2.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................... 42 2.5 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................... 47 2.6 Energy .................................................................................................................... 57 2.7 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................... 64 2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ..................................................................................... 69 2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................... 74 2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................................. 79 2.11 Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................... 86 2.12 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................. 88 2.13 Noise...................................................................................................................... 90 2.14 Population and Housing ......................................................................................... 99 2.15 Public Services ..................................................................................................... 101 2.16 Recreation ............................................................................................................ 107 2.17 Transportation...................................................................................................... 109 2.18 Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................................ 113 2.19 Wildfire ................................................................................................................ 122 2.20 Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................................... 124 Section 3: List of Preparers ........................................................................................................... 127 Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, and Noise Supporting Information A.1 - Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Report A.2 - Noise Report Biological Resources Supporting Information B.1 - Database Searches B.2 - Field Notes and Site Photographs B.3 - Special-status Species Table Cultural and Tribal Resources Supporting Information C.1 - Cultural and Tribal Record Search C.2 - Historical Resources Evaluation Report C.3 - Paleontological Records Search Results Geotechnical Investigation City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Table of Contents Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration iv FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments Hydrology and Water Quality Supporting Information F.1 - Preliminary Hydrology Study F.2 - Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Public Services Letters Traffic Impact Analysis H.1 - Traffic Impact Analysis Report H.2 - Vehicle Miles Screening Memorandum List of Tables Table 1: Required Parking .................................................................................................................. 3 Table 2: Parking Provided ................................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Project-Generated Regional Construction Emissions ........................................................... 34 Table 4: Operational Regional Pollutants .......................................................................................... 35 Table 5: Comparison of Construction LSTs and Project Construction Emissions ................................. 37 Table 6: Comparison of Operational LSTs and Project Operational Emissions(Unmitigated) .............. 38 Table 7: Proposed Project Compliance with General Plan Energy Conservation Policies .................... 62 Table 8: Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions ............................................................. 72 Table 9: Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Homes ....................................................................... 91 Table 10: Existing Year Traffic Noise Contributions ........................................................................... 93 Table 11: Opening Year Project Traffic Noise Contributions .............................................................. 94 Table 12: General Plan Buildout Project Traffic Noise Contributions ................................................. 94 Table 13: Proposed Townhomes Private Patio Areas Roadway Noise Levels ...................................... 96 Table 14: Proposed Townhomes Interior Noise Levels from Roadway Noise ..................................... 96 Table 15: City of Anaheim Fire Service Facilities ............................................................................. 102 Table 16: Proposed Project Trip Generation ................................................................................... 110 Table 17: City of Anaheim Water Supply and Demand Assessment................................................. 116 Table 18: Orange County Sanitation District Sewer Treatment Availability ...................................... 118 Table 19: Orange County Landfill Availability .................................................................................. 119 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Regional Location Map ....................................................................................................... 7 Exhibit 2: Local Vicinity Map .............................................................................................................. 9 Exhibit 3: General Plan Land Use...................................................................................................... 11 City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Table of Contents FirstCarbon Solutions v Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Exhibit 4: Zoning .............................................................................................................................. 13 Exhibit 5: Site Plan ........................................................................................................................... 15 Exhibit 6: Landscaping ..................................................................................................................... 17 Exhibit 7a: Conceptual Elevations .................................................................................................... 19 Exhibit 7b: Conceptual Elevations .................................................................................................... 21 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Acronyms and Abbreviations FirstCarbon Solutions vii Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS µg/m3 micrograms per cubic meter AB Assembly Bill ACM asbestos-containing material ADA Americans with Disabilities Act ADT Average Daily Traffic AFY acre-feet per year AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act APN Assessor’s Parcel Number APU Anaheim Public Utilities ARB California Air Resources Board AQMD Air Quality Management District BAU business-as-usual BERD Built Environment Resource Directory BGS below ground surface BMP Best Management Practice BPP Basin Production Percentage C-G Commercial-General CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code CAL/OSHA California Division of Occupational Safety and Health CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Caltrans California Department of Transportation CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CBC California Building Standards Code CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act cfs cubic feet per second CH4 methane CMP Congestion Management Plan CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CNPSEI California Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory CO carbon monoxide City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Acronyms and Abbreviations Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration viii FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx CO2 carbon dioxide CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent CPHI California Points of Historical Interest CPS Connector Pipe Screen CRHR California Register of Historical Resources CUP Conditional Use Permit CWA Clean Water Act DAMP Drainage Area Management Plan dB decibels dBA A-weighted decibels DCV Design Capture Volume DOC California Department of Conservation DPM diesel particulate matter DPR California Department of Parks and Recreation DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances du/acre dwelling unit per acre EIR Environmental Impact Report ESA Environmental Site Assessment EOP Emergency Operations Plan EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency EV electric vehicle FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG greenhouse gas GP General Plan GPA General Plan Amendment GPCD gallons per capita per day GPD gallons per day GPD/du gallons per day per dwelling unit GPPP General Plan Plus Project HCM Highway Capacity Manual HFC hydrofluorocarbons HOA Homeowner’s Association HRA Health Risk Assessment ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Acronyms and Abbreviations FirstCarbon Solutions ix Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers kBTU kilo-British Therman Unit KSF thousand square feet kW kilowatt kWh kilowatt-hour LBP lead-based paint lbs pounds Leq equivalent sound level LID Low Impact Development LOS Level of Service LRA Local Responsibility Area LST localized significance threshold MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act Metropolitan Metropolitan Water District of Southern California MGD million gallons per day MLD Most Likely Descendant MM Mitigation Measure mph miles per hour MRZ Mineral Resource Zone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MT metric tons MWS Modular Wetland System N2O nitrous oxide NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NIMS National Incident Management System NOX nitrogen oxides NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System NRHP National Register of Historic Places OC Basin Orange County Groundwater Basin OCFCD Orange County Flood Control District OCP organochlorine pesticide OC San Orange County Sanitation District OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority OCWD Orange County Water District OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration OY Opening Year City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Acronyms and Abbreviations Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration x FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx OYPP Opening Year Plus Project PDF Project Design Feature PFC perfluorocarbon PM particulate matter PM10 particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns ppm parts per million PPV peak particle velocity PV photovoltaic RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model REC Recognized Environmental Condition RHNA Regional Housing Needs Assessment RM-1 Multiple-Family Residential (3,350 square feet minimum lot area) RM-2 Multiple-Family Residential (3,000 square feet minimum lot area) RM-3 Multiple-Family Residential (2,400 square feet minimum lot area) RM-3.5 Multiple-Family Residential (1,600 square feet minimum lot area) RM-4 Multiple-Family Residential (1,200 square feet minimum lot area) RSL Regional Screening Level RTP Regional Transportation Plan SB Senate Bill SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center SCS Sustainable Communities Survey SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SLF Sacred Land File SoCAB South Coast Air Basin SOX sulfur oxides SP service population SRA State Responsibility Area SRRE Source Reduction and Recycling Element STC Sound Transmission Class SUBTM Subdivision Tentative Tract Map SWIS Solid Waste Information System SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TAC toxic air contaminant TCR Tribal Cultural Resources TIA Traffic Impact Analysis City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Acronyms and Abbreviations FirstCarbon Solutions xi Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx TPA Transit Priority Area USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service UWMP Urban Water Management Plan V/C volume to capacity VHFSZ Very High Fire Severity Zone VHFHSZ Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC volatile organic compounds WAWPSS West Anaheim Water Plan of Sanitary Sewers WQMP Water Quality Management Plan YMCA Young Men’s Christian Association ZEV Zero-Emission Vehicles THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Introduction FirstCarbon Solutions 1 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 - Purpose The purpose of this Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) is to identify any potential environmental impacts that would result from implementation of the West Broadway Townhomes Project (proposed project) in the City of Anaheim (City), in Orange County, California. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15367, the City has discretionary authority over the proposed project and is the Lead Agency in the preparation of this Draft IS/MND and any additional environmental documentation required for the proposed project. The intended use of this document is to analyze the proposed project pursuant to the requirements of CEQA and to provide the basis for input from public agencies, organizations, and interested members of the public. The remainder of this section provides a brief description of the project location and the primary project characteristics. Section 2 includes an environmental checklist that provides an overview of the potential impacts that may result from project implementation, elaborates on the information contained in the environmental checklist, and provides justification for each checklist response. Section 3 contains the List of Preparers. 1.2 - Project Location The project site is located at 1661 to 1673 West Broadway, in the City of Anaheim, in Orange County, California (Exhibit 1). The approximately 1.55-acre project site consists of two parcels, Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 250-101-08 and 250-101-09. The project site is immediately north of Broadway, an east–west oriented roadway, and is approximately 0.56 mile west of Interstate 5 (I-5), the Santa Ana Freeway. As shown in Exhibit 2, the project site is in the western/central portion of the City. Regional access to the project site is from I-5 via Broadway, Lincoln Avenue, and Euclid Street exits. 1.3 - Environmental Setting Land Uses and Zoning The proposed project would demolish the existing buildings and improvements on the project site, which consist of three single-story multi-tenant office buildings and a shared asphalt parking lot. The tenants of the office buildings include various medical and dental offices, dental labs, a former pharmacy, an acupuncture practice, and a massage establishment. The project site also includes an illegal cannabis dispensary that has been reported to City of Anaheim Community Preservation Division for appropriate code enforcement action. From at least the 1930s until the early 1960s, the project site was an orchard. By 1963, the development on the project site consisted of one rectangular structure on the western portion of the project site. By 1972, the project site had been developed with all three existing structures and an asphalt parking lot. City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Introduction Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The General Plan currently designates the project site for Office–Low land use (Exhibit 3).1 The proposed project would require a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to modify the land use designation from Office–Low to Mid Density Residential. The Mid Density Residential land use designation provides for a wide range of residential uses, including detached, small-lot single-family homes, attached single-family homes, patio homes, zero lot line homes, duplexes, and townhouses. The Multiple-Family Residential Zones (RM-1, RM-2, RM-3, and RM-3.5) are the typical implementing zones for this land use designation. The permitted density range is from zero up to 27 dwelling units per gross acre (du/acre); the maximum density of the Mid Density Residential designation is 27.0 du/acre.2 The project site is within the “C-G” General Commercial Zone (Exhibit 4). The proposed project would require a zone change from the C-G Zone to the RM-3.5 Zone. The intent of the RM-3.5 Zone is to provide an attractive, safe, and healthy environment consisting of multiple-family units with a minimum building site area per dwelling unit of 1,600 square feet. This zone implements the Mid Density Residential and the Medium Density Residential land use designations in the General Plan. Buildings in the RM-3.5 Zone are limited to 40 feet in height. The proposed project would require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit 34 single-family attached dwellings in the Residential Planned Unit Development with modified setbacks between buildings, interior landscape setbacks, and street setbacks. Surrounding Land Uses North Residential 2-story apartment buildings in the “RM-4” Multiple-Family Residential zone. South Residential 1-story, 2-story and 3-story apartment buildings and condominiums in the RM-4 Zone across Broadway. East Residential 2-story apartments in the RM-4 Zone, Passion Bread of Life Christian Church in the Transitional (T) Zone. West A strip mall with retail stores, hair salon, and laundromat; Shalom Mission Baptist Church; and the Anaheim Family Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) in the C-G Zone. 1.4 - Project Description The applicant, City Ventures Homebuilding, LLC, is proposing to develop 34 attached townhomes on an approximately 1.55-acre project site (Exhibit 5). The proposed project would include demolition of the three existing buildings and the parking lot on-site and the construction of five residential buildings, roadways, sidewalks, and associated improvements on the project site. Each building would include either six townhomes or eight townhomes. The proposed project would include the following floor plan variations: • Six 1,062-square-foot, 2-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom townhomes (Plan 1). • Four 1,342-square-foot, 2-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom townhomes with a loft (Plan 2a). 1 City of Anaheim. 2004. City of Anaheim General Plan, Land Use Element. Figure LU-4, Land Use Plan. Revised March 9, 2021. Website: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/9522. Accessed July 29, 2021. 2 Ibid. City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Introduction FirstCarbon Solutions 3 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx • Four 1,342-square-foot, 3-bedroom, 2.5-bathroom townhomes (Plan 2b). • Ten 1,317-square-foot, 3-bedroom, 3-bathroom townhomes (Plan 3). • Ten 1,633-square-foot, 4-bedroom, 4-bathroom townhomes with an optional den (Plan 4). The proposed project would provide private roadways and parking, pedestrian walkways, common space, and landscaping. In the RM-3.5 Zone, required street setback for ground-floor patios is 12 feet; required interior structural setbacks are 20 feet for primary elevations of a 3-story building, and 5 feet for interior landscape setbacks. The required building-to-building setback between 3-story primary elevations is 40 feet. The proposed project’s setbacks would be 10 feet for the ground-floor patios street setback, 15 feet for interior structural setbacks, 1-foot 4-inches for interior landscape setbacks, and 20 feet and 6 inches for setbacks between buildings. Density on the project site would be 21.93 dwelling units per acre, which would not exceed the maximum density of the proposed Mid Density Residential land use designation of 27 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project would provide a covered and gated trash enclosure on the west side of the project site. The project applicant would request a GPA from Office-Low to Mid Density Residential, Zoning Reclassification from C-G to RM-3.5, Tentative Tract Map to create a 1-lot subdivision for condominium purposes, a CUP to modify setback standards, and a development agreement to provide a voluntary contribution to the City’s affordable housing programs. Parking and Circulation Vehicles would access the project site via one main driveway entry from Broadway, located at the southwest corner of the project site. An internal private roadway system would provide two-way access to the surface parking lots and to the attached parking garages. The new roadway system would include a Fire Department turnaround per Anaheim Fire & Rescue standards. The proposed project would have 100 on-site parking spaces, consisting of 32 open parking spaces on the west side of the project site and 68 garage spaces, resulting in 2.94 spaces per home. The proposed parking spaces would meet the Code requirement of 100 spaces as shown in the tables below. Parking would include two accessible parking spaces. One parking space would be electric vehicle (EV) ready. Pedestrians would circulate within the proposed project via internal pedestrian walkways and sidewalks located throughout the site. Table 1 shows the required parking for the proposed project, and Table 2 shows the parking that would be provided as part of the proposed project. Table 1: Required Parking Unit Type Unit Count Required parking per unit Required Spaces 2-bedroom 10 2.25 22.5 3-bedroom 14 3.0 42 4-bedroom 10 3.5 35 TOTAL 34 2.94 100 City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Introduction Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 4 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 2: Parking Provided Parking Space Type Spaces Provided Garage 68 Head-In 30 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)-compliant 2 TOTAL 100 Open Space and Landscaping The proposed project would provide 9,480 square feet of recreation-leisure area, which exceeds the Code requirement to provide 9,350 square feet. Recreation-leisure area would include 7,499 square feet of common areas and 1,981 square feet of private open space. The private open space would include 1,281 square feet of ground-level patios and 700 square feet of second-floor deck areas. The proposed project would provide amenities that include interior community gathering areas with decorative paving and large trees. The total landscaped area, including landscape setbacks and deck areas, would be 11,782 square feet and would consist of street shade trees, screening trees, parking lot shade trees, landscape hedging around trash enclosures, décor pottery, patios, and common areas. Tree species to be planted would include species with low to medium irrigation needs, such as little gem magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora “Little Gem”), western sycamore (Platanus racemose), jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia), southern live oak (Quercus virginiana), marina strawberry tree (Arbutus unedo “Marina”), and Hercules aloe (Aloe “Hercules”). Shrubs and groundcover would include species with very low to medium irrigation needs, such as desert spoon (Dasylirion wheeleri), brake lights red yucca (Hesperaloe parviflora “Brake Lights”), agave (Agave spp.), French lavender (Lavandula dentata), green cloud Texas sage (Leucophyllum f. “Green Cloud”), and star jasmine (Trachelospermum jasminoides) (Exhibit 6). Approval of the proposed project would include a condition of approval requiring a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) to own and maintain all common area landscaping within the project site. Building Design The proposed project would include five plans. All homes would be three stories tall, or 38 to 40 feet in height, and would include attached 2-car side-by-side or tandem garages on the ground-level floor. The living spaces of the townhomes would be located on the second and third floors, and Plan 4 would include a bedroom on the first floor. Each townhome would have private patios or decks. The front exterior building material would consist of cement siding or fiber cement siding and stucco finish, with horizontal metal railings for the decks, vinyl window and door trim, and a decorative front entry door, as shown in Exhibit 7a and Exhibit 7b. Infrastructure and Utilities The proposed project would connect to existing water and sanitary lines on Broadway and would install stormwater drainage systems on-site. A transformer would be to be located in proximity to City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Introduction FirstCarbon Solutions 5 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx the main driveway entry along Broadway. The proposed project would connect to existing water and sanitary lines on Broadway and would include the installation of stormwater management systems on-site. The entire site would be all electric and solar, therefore, there would be no gas usage on- site. Construction The applicant anticipates that construction the proposed project would begin September/October 2022 and the duration of construction would last between 18 to 24 months. Construction activities would include demolition of the existing paved surfaces and structures, site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coatings, and paving. Construction of the proposed project would require 400 cubic yards of imported soil/fill material. 1.5 - Required Discretionary Approvals As mentioned previously, the City of Anaheim has discretionary authority over the proposed project and is the CEQA Lead Agency for the preparation of this Draft IS/MND. In order to implement the project, the City would need to secure the following permits/approvals: • Development agreement to permit a voluntary financial contribution to support the City’s affordable housing programs • General Plan Amendment for a land use designation change from Office – Low to Mid Density Residential. • Zoning Map Amendment (Reclassification) from the C-G Zone to the RM-3.5 Zone. • Tentative Tract Map (SUBTM) to create a 1-lot subdivision for condominium purposes. • CUP to permit 34 Single-Family Attached Dwellings in the Residential Planned Unit Development with modified standards, including: - Setback between buildings, where 40 feet would be required, and 20 feet 6 inches would be provided. - Interior structural setbacks, where 20 feet would be required, and 15 feet would be provided. - Interior landscape setbacks, where 5 feet would be required, and 1-foot 4-inches would be provided. - Street setback for ground-floor patios, where 12 feet would be required, and 10 feet would be provided. 1.6 - Intended Uses of this Document This Draft IS/MND has been prepared to determine the appropriate scope and level of detail required in completing the environmental analysis for the proposed project. This document will also serve as a basis for soliciting comments and input from members of the public and public agencies regarding the proposed project. CEQA Guidelines Section 15073(d) states, “Where one or more state agencies will be a responsible agency or a trustee agency or will exercise jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Introduction Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 6 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx project, or where the project is of Statewide, regional, or areawide environmental significance, the Lead Agency shall send copies of the proposed negative declaration or mitigated negative declaration to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to state agencies.” Because the proposed project is not of Statewide, regional, or areawide environmental significance and there are no responsible or trustee agencies involved, the City will circulate the Draft IS/MND for a minimum of 20-day public review period. The public may provide comments concerning the analysis contained in the Draft IS/MND to: Andy Uk, Associate Planner City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Email: Auk@Anaheim.net ! s Orange C ounty S an B ernardino C ounty Orange County Los Angeles County ·|}þ91 ·|}þ83 ·|}þ91 ·|}þ55 ·|}þ57 ·|}þ241 ·|}þ261 ·|}þ241 !"#$405 !"#$5 Or a n g e Co u n t yRi v e r s i d e Co u n t y ·|}þ60 ·|}þ110 %&'(710 %&'(5 %&'(605 %&'(10 %&'(5 %&'(405 ·|}þ22 ·|}þ133 ·|}þ1 ·|}þ1 ·|}þ210 Pacific Ocean Cleveland National Forest San Dimas CovinaAlhambra El Monte Pomona OntarioEast Los Angeles Walnut ChinoCommerce Whittier Norwalk Yorba LindaFullerton Anaheim Orange Long Beach Garden Grove Seal Beach Santa Ana Fountain Valley Huntington Beach Costa Mesa Irvine Lake Forest Newport Beach Laguna Hills Laguna Niguel San Juan Capistrano Bell Chino Hills UplandClaremont Montclair Laguna Woods Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map ! Text Project Site Source: Census 2000 Data, The California Spatial Information Library (CaSIL). I CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 00550087 • 10/2021 | 1_regional.mxd Project Site 5052.5 Miles City of Anaheim THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 • 08/2021 | 2_local_vicinity.mxd Exhibit 2Local Vicinity Map Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. CITY OF ANAHEIMWEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECTINITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Legend Project Site 1,000 0 1,000500 Feet THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 08/2021 | 3_general_plan_land_use.cdr• Source: City of Anaheim General Plan, Adopted May 25, 2004; Revised March 9, 2021. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 3 General Plan Land Use Map Project Site THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 08/2021 | 4_zoning.cdr• Source: City of Anaheim Zoning, Adopted June 8, 2004; Revised April 22, 2021. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 4 Zoning Map Project Site THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 04/2022 | 5_site_plan.cdr• Source: WHA Architects, Planners, Designers, 03/22/2022. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 5 Site Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 04/2022 | 6_landscape_plan.cdr• Source: C2|Collaborative, Landscape Architecture, 03/17/2022. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 6 Landscape Plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 10/2021 | 7a_conceptual_elevations.cdr• Source: WHA Architects, Planners, Designers, 06/21/2021. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 7a Conceptual Elevations THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 00550087 10/2021 | 7b_conceptual_elevations.cdr• Source: WHA Architects, Planners, Designers, 06/21/2021. CITY OF ANAHEIM WEST BROADWAY TOWNHOME PROJECT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Exhibit 7b Conceptual Elevations THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 23 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx SECTION 2: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities and Services Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measure based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Date: Signed: May 4, 2022 Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.1 Aesthetics Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a State Scenic Highway? c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Environmental Evaluation Setting The City’s General Plan discusses the City’s ridgelines, views, and vistas in the Green Element. Although most of the western, northern, and southern areas of the City are built out, the Hill and Canyon area in the eastern portion of the City contains a significant amount of open space and borders on major open space resources, including the Chino Hills State Park, the Cleveland National Forest, and the Santa Ana River. Scenic highways are discussed in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The intent of the California Scenic Highway program is to enhance the State’s natural beauty and protect California’s economic and social resources. Scenic Highways are transportation corridors where visual intrusions would impact views of natural beauty from the highway. State highways nominated for scenic designation must be included on the list of highways eligible for scenic designation in the State Scenic Highway System. Scenic highways are typically located within an unspoiled native habitat that showcases the unique aspects of the landscape. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less than significant impact. Views and vistas of the natural contours of the Hill and Canyon area and the Santa Ana Mountains ridgeline are considered the primary aesthetic resource in the City. Other visual resources such as golf courses and the Santa Ana River also provide visual relief from the urban environment. The project site is approximately 11 miles west of the Hill and Canyon area City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 25 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx and approximately 10.5 miles northwest of the Santa Ana Mountains. The closest golf course to the project site is the Dad Miller Golf Course, approximately 1.4 miles west. Additionally, the Santa Ana River is approximately 4 miles east of the project site. The project site is characterized as flat and fully developed and is surrounded by mature trees and residential and commercial uses. Therefore, there are no scenic views available at the project site of any of the aesthetic resources identified in the General Plan. Partial views of the Santa Ana Mountains are available from the East Broadway right-of-way; however, those views would not be affected by the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly affect public viewpoints of scenic vistas, there would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a State Scenic Highway? Less than significant impact. Within the City, State Route (SR) 91, between SR-55 and Weir Canyon Road is officially designated as a Scenic Highway. The portion of SR-91 east of Weir Canyon is designated as an eligible Scenic Highway. However, neither of these scenic highways are within the project vicinity according to the General Plan Circulation Element Figure C-3, Scenic Highways.3 The project site is located approximately 6.2 miles west of the SR-91 and approximately 7.2 miles west of the eligible Scenic Highway, the portion of SR-91 east of Weir Canyon. Additionally, there are no scenic resources located on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not damage scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway, there would be no impact and no mitigation is required. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than significant impact. The proposed project is within a built-up, urbanized area. Presently, the project site is developed with three single-story multi-tenant office buildings with a shared asphalt parking lot and is zoned C-G. The proposed project consists of the development of 34 attached townhomes on the approximately 1.55-acre project site and would include a zone change from C-G to RM-3.5 Zone. This zone change would allow for multiple-family units with a minimum building site area per dwelling of 1,600 square feet. The development of the proposed project would result in a building site area per dwelling of approximately 1,985 square feet with is consistent with the zoning requirement for RM-3.5 Zone. The proposed project building heights would be 38 to 40 feet consistent with the RM-3.5 Zone building height limit of 40 feet.4 The area surrounding the site does not otherwise contain any regulations governing scenic quality. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 3 City of Anaheim. 2004. Circulation Element. May. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/9520/D-0-Circulation- Element?bidId=. Accessed February 25, 2022. 4 City of Anaheim. 2022. Anaheim Municipal Code. February. Website: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/anaheim/latest/anaheim_ca/0-0-0-65724. Accessed: February 25, 2022 Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 26 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would develop 34 attached townhomes on an approximately 1.55-acre project site where the existing improvements, three single-story multi- tenant office buildings and a shared asphalt parking lot, would be demolished. The existing site includes exterior lighting on the existing buildings, but it does not include overhead lighting in the parking lot. Because the project site is previously developed, the increase in light and glare would not be substantially greater than the existing lighting at the project site. Additionally, the proposed project would comply with the City’s Building Standards Code and would be designed to ensure that exterior lighting would have zero direct-beam illumination that would leave the project site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 27 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the State’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Environmental Evaluation In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation (DOC) as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) regarding the State’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board (ARB). Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 28 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Setting Information and analysis for Agricultural and Forest Services impacts are based on the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element and the DOC Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by CAL FIRE regarding the State’s inventory of forest land. Such information includes the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project, and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the ARB. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? No impact. The project area is classified as Urban and Built-Up Land and is not adjacent to any farmlands, according to the DOC FMMP of the California Resources Agency.5 The nearest farmland is classified as Unique Farmland and is located 1.5 miles south of the project site adjacent to the Union Pacific railroad. Additionally, there is farmland classified as Unique Farmland located 2.3 miles west of the project site near the intersection of Orange Avenue and South Sherill Street. The proposed project would not create impacts on any of these farmlands and would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to nonagricultural uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to farmland conversion, and no impacts would occur. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? No impact. The project site is currently zoned as C-G and would be rezoned as RM-3.5 (Exhibit 4: Zoning).6 The project site is not currently zoned for agricultural uses, nor is it currently in agricultural production. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any existing zoning for agricultural use. According to the DOC, the City of Anaheim does not contain Williamson Act Contract Land.7 Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to potential conflicts with existing agricultural zoning or a Williamson Act Contract. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? 5 California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2016. Important Farmland Finder. Website: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. Accessed August 8, 2021. 6 City of Anaheim. 2021. Zoning Title 18. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1871/Zoning-Map?bidId=. Accessed August 8, 2021. 7 California Department of Conservation (DOC). Division of Land Resource Protection. 2017. State of California Williamson Contract Land. Website: https://planning.lacity.org/eir/HollywoodCenter/Deir/ELDP/(E)%20Initial%20Study/Initial%20Study/Attachment%20B%20Reference s/California%20Department%20of%20Conservation%20Williamson%20Map%202016.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2021. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 29 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx No impact. The project site is currently zoned as C-G and would be rezoned as RM-3.5 (Exhibit 4).8 The project site is not zoned as forest land or timberland and is not zoned for Timberland Production. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for Forest Land, Timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The proposed project would have no impacts related to forest land and timberland. d) Resu lt in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No impact. The project site is currently developed with office buildings and a parking lot and is located in an urbanized area. The project site does not currently contain forest land or agricultural land. Areas zoned as C-G or as RM-3.5 are not intended for forest uses. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to loss or conversion of agricultural or forest land. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No impact. As discussed throughout this section, the proposed project would not result in impacts to farmland or forest land. The proposed project would not result in any other changes that could result in the conversion of farmland to non-agriculture uses or the conversion of forest land to non- forest uses. Therefore, there would be no impacts. Mitigation Measures None required. 8 City of Anaheim. 2021. Zoning Title 18. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/1871/Zoning-Map?bidId=. Accessed August 8, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 30 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.3 Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors or) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Environmental Evaluation Where available, the significance criteria established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Setting This analysis is partly based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis West Broadway Townhomes Project, Vista Environmental, March 4, 2022, included in Appendix A. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than significant impact. To evaluate whether or not a project conflicts with or obstructs the implementation of the applicable air quality plan (2016 Air Quality Management Plan [AQMP] for the South Coast Air Basin [SoCAB]), the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook states that there are two key indicators. These indicators are identified by the criteria discussed below. 1. Indicator: Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2. Indicator: According to Chapter 12 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, the purpose of the General Plan consistency findings is to determine whether a project is inconsistent City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 31 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx with the growth assumptions incorporated into the air quality plan, and thus, whether it would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with federal and California air quality standards. Considering the recommended criteria in the SCAQMD’s 1993 Handbook, this analysis uses the following criteria to address this potential impact: Step 1: The project’s contribution to air quality violations (SCAQMD’s first indicator) Step 2: Assumptions in AQMP (SCAQMD’s second indicator) Step 3: Compliance with applicable emission control measures in the AQMPs Step 1: The Proposed Project’s Contribution to Air Quality Violations According to the SCAQMD, a project is consistent with the AQMP if the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.9 If a project’s emissions do not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOX), or particulate matter (PM10 or PM2.5), it follows that the project’s emissions would not exceed the allowable limit for each project in order for the region to attain and maintain ambient air quality standards, which is the primary goal of air quality plans. As shown in Impact 2.3(b) below, the proposed project’s regional construction and operational emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Furthermore, as described in Impact 2.3(c) below, the proposed project ’s lo calized construction and operational emissions would not exceed the project location- specific SCAQMD localized construction and operational analyses use localized significance thresholds (LSTs). Considering this information, the proposed project’s construc tion and operational emissions would not contribute substantially to potential air quality violations and thus would comply with the applicable air quality plan. Step 2: Assumptions in the Air Quality Management Plan The development of emission burdens used in AQMPs to demonstrate compliance with ambient air quality standards is based, in part, on land use patterns contained within local general plans. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that if a project is consistent with the applicable general plan land use designation, and if the general plan was adopted prior to the applicable AQMP, then the growth of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and/or population generated by said project would be consistent with the growth in VMT and population assumed within the AQMP. The City of Anaheim adopted its General Plan in 2004, which is prior to the adoption of the AQMP in 2016. The City adopted its General Plan Land Use Map in 2004 and has revised it as recently as March 2019. As previously discussed, the project site is currently designated as Office-Low (O-L) in the General Plan Land Use Plan and is zoned General Commercial (C-G). The proposed project consists of the development of 34 townhomes on 1.55 net acres, which would result in a density of 22 dwelling units per acre. As such, the project applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment and Zoning 9 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April. Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993). Accessed March 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 32 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Amendment to redesignate and rezone the project site to Mid Density Residential, which allows for up to 27 dwelling units per acre, and to rezone the project site to RM-3.5, which allows a minimum building site area per dwelling unit of 1,600 square feet. The proposed project would require a GPA to modify the land use designation from Office–Low to Mid Density Residential and a zone change from the C-G Zone to the RM-3.5 Zone. The proposed townhomes would be a compatible use to the existing multi-family residential uses that are located to the north, northeast, and south sides of the project site, and would provide housing in close proximity to the existing commercial uses to the west and the church and school to the east, which would promote a walkable community. The project site is also close to the Euclid-Broadway Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA ) bus stop that is located 350 feet west of the project site. Furthermore, the majority of the project trips and associated emissions associated with the project site would have been accounted for in the AQMP as trips and emissions associated with the existing Office-Low development. As further described in the Land Use and Planning section of this document, implementation of the proposed project would not cause any significant adverse effects associated with land use and planning. Emissions associated with the current allowable land use and the proposed use of the project site would be comparable. As described later in this document, under Population and Housing, impacts associated with the project ’s potential to induce substantial unplanned population growth was found to be less than significant. Considering the project’s less than significant impacts related to land use and population, growth supported by the proposed project is reasonably accounted for in the AQMP. Step 3: Control Measures The AQMP contains a number of control measures, which are enforceable requirements through the adoption of rules and regulations. Applicable rules and regulations are listed in Appendix A. The proposed project would comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations. Therefore, the project complies with applicable emission control measures in the AQMPs. Summary In summary, the proposed project would not exceed the growth assumptions in the AQMP. The proposed project would not result in a regional or localized exceedance of criteria air pollutants and would comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations. Accordingly, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plans, therefore, this impact would be less than significant. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard? Less than significant impact. This impact is related to the cumulative effect of a project’s regional criteria pollutant emissions. As described above, the region is currently in nonattainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. By its nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact resulting from emissions generated over a large geographic region. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development within the SoCAB, and this regional impact is a cumulative impact. In other words, new development projects (such as the proposed project) within the SoCAB would City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 33 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx contribute to this impact only on a cumulative basis. No single project would be sufficient in size, by itself, to result in nonattainment of regional air quality standards. Instead, a project’s emissions may be individually limited, but cumulatively considerable when taken in combination with past, present, and future development projects. All new development that would result in an increase in air pollutant emissions above those assumed in regional air quality plans would contribute to cumulative air quality impacts. The cumulative analysis focuses on whether a specific project would result in cumulatively considerable emissions. According to Section 15064(h)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, the existence of significant cumulative impacts caused by other projects alone does not constitute substantial evidence that a project’s incremental effects would be cumulatively considerable. Rather, the determination of cumulative air quality impacts for construction and operational emissions is based on whether a project would result in regional emissions that exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for construction and operations on a project level. Projects that generate emissions below the SCAQMD significance thresholds would be considered consistent with regional air quality planning efforts and would not generate cumulatively considerable emissions. The proposed project ’s regional construction and operational emissions, which include both on- and off-site emissions, are evaluated separately below. Construction and operational emissions from the proposed project were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2020.4.0. A detailed description of the assumptions used to estimate emissions and the complete CalEEMod output files are contained in Appendix A. Cumulative Construction Emissions Construction emissions are described as “short-term” or temporary in duration; however, they have the potential to represent a significant impact with respect to air quality. Construction of the proposed project would result in the temporary generation of VOCs, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from construction activities such as demolition, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and asphalt paving. Fugitive PM dust emissions are primarily associated with earth disturbance and grading activities and vary as a function of soil silt content, soil moisture, wind speed, acreage of disturbance area, and miles traveled by construction vehicles on-site and off-site. Construction-related NOX emissions are primarily generated by exhaust emissions from heavy-duty construction equipment, material and haul trucks, and construction worker vehicles. VOC emissions are mainly generated by exhaust emissions from construction vehicles, off-gas emissions associated with architectural coatings, and asphalt paving. Table 3 presents the proposed project ’s maximum daily construction emissions for each construction activity and during the entire construction duration using the worst-case summer or winter daily construction-related criteria pollutant emissions for each construction phase. All construction activities would comply with applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations, including Rule 403, to minimize fugitive PM dust emissions. For detailed assumptions, methodologies, and models used to estimate emissions, please refer to Appendix A, Section 8, Modeling Parameters and Assumptions. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 34 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 3: Project-Generated Regional Construction Emissions Construction Activity Regional Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day)1 VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 1.77 17.96 14.76 0.03 1.68 0.95 Site Preparation 1.35 14.92 7.45 0.02 3.20 1.78 Grading 1.62 18.63 10.01 0.03 3.82 2.11 Building Construction—2022 1.78 12.96 14.04 0.03 1.05 0.69 Combined Building Construction - 2023, Paving and Architectural Coatings 32.27 19.65 25.05 0.04 1.57 1.03 Project Maximum Daily Emissions 32.27 19.65 25.05 0.04 3.82 2.11 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: CO = carbon monoxide NOX = oxides of nitrogen PM10 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District SOX =sulfur oxides VOC = volatile organic compounds 1 Assumes compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Source of emissions: CalEEMod Output (see Appendix A). Source of thresholds: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2015. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project ’s regional daily construction emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in construction emissions, and this impact would be less than significant. Cumulative Operational Emissions Following construction of the proposed project, long-term operational emissions would be generated from day-to-day project operations. Operational emissions for land use development projects are typically distinguished as mobile-, area-, and energy-source emissions. Mobile-source emissions are those associated with automobiles that would travel to and from a project site. Area- source emissions are those associated with natural gas combustion for space and water heating, landscape maintenance activities, and periodic architectural coatings. Energy-source emissions are those associated with electricity consumption and are more pertinent for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than for air quality pollutants. For detailed assumptions, methodologies, and models used to estimate emissions, please refer to Appendix A, Section 8, Modeling Parameters and Assumptions. As described in Appendix A, the proposed project would demolish and remove the existing office buildings and associated driveways. Emissions from the existing office buildings and driveways were estimated according to the parameters presented in Appendix A and were included in the baseline City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 35 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx emissions when determining net project operational emissions. Table 4 presents the proposed project ’s maximum daily operational emissions between summer and winter seasons. Table 4: Operational Regional Pollutants Operational Activity Regional Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day)1 VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 Area 1.49 0.03 2.80 <0.00 0.02 0.02 Energy 0.02 0.14 0.06 <0.00 0.01 0.01 Mobile 0.66 0.66 6.09 0.01 1.53 0.41 Total Net Project Daily Emissions 2.17 0.84 8.95 001 1.55 0.44 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: VOC = volatile organic compounds NOX = oxides of nitrogen CO = carbon monoxide SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District SOX = sulfur oxides PM10 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns 1 Emissions shown represent the maximum daily emissions from summer and winter seasons for each operational emission source and pollutant. Therefore, total daily operational emissions represent maximum daily emissions that could occur throughout the year. Source of emissions: CalEEMod Output (see Appendix A). Source of thresholds: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2015. As shown in Table 3, the proposed project’s net daily operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance. Considering that the proposed project ’s net long-term operational emissions would not exceed any significance thresholds, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of operational emissions. The cumulative impact from long-term operation of the proposed project would therefore be less than significant. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than significant impact. This impact evaluates the potential for the proposed project ’s construction and operational emissions to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration. Sensitive receptors are defined as those individuals who are sensitive to air pollution, including children, the elderly, and persons with preexisting respiratory or cardiovascular illness. For purposes of CEQA, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24 hours, such as residences, hospitals, or convalescent facilities.10 Commercial and industrial facilities are not included in the definition because employees do not 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). (2006). Final –Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds. October. Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized- significance-thresholds/particulate-matter-(pm)-2.5-significance-thresholds -and-calculation- methodology/final_pm2_5methodology.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed March 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 36 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx typically remain on-site for 24 hours. However, when assessing the impact of pollutants with 1-hour or 8-hour standards (such as NO2 and CO), commercial and/or industrial facilities would be considered sensitive receptors. The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are residents at the multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet north of the project site. The nearest school is Loara Elementary School, which is located as near as 135 feet east of the project site. This analysis evaluates the potential for construction- and operational-related criteria air pollutant, ozone precursor, and toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions to impact sensitive receptors. Localized Significance Threshold Analysis—Criteria Pollutants The localized construction and operational analyses use thresholds (i.e., LSTs) represent the maximum emissions for a project that would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard.11 LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the Source Receptor Area where a project is located, the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor, and the size of the project site, all of which are the primary factors that influence pollutant concentrations. If a project’s construction or operational emissions are under those thresholds, it follows that the project would not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the standard and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Localized Construction Analysis As discussed in Section 8 of the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report (Modeling Parameters and Assumptions; see Appendix A), the LST Methodology only applies to on-site emissions and states that “off-site mobile emissions from the project should not be included in the emissions compared to LSTs.” Therefore, for purposes of the construction LST analysis, only on-site emissions are compared with the applicable LSTs. As outlined in Appendix A, Section 9.2, Thresholds of Significance, the project site is located in Air Monitoring Area 17, which covers the central portion of Orange County. The Lookup Tables provided in the LST Methodology include project site acreage sizes of 1-acre, 2-acres, and 5-acres. Since the project site is 1.55 acres, the 1-acre and 2-acre project sites shown in the Lookup Tables were interpolated in order to calculate the 1.55-acre threshold that has been utilized in this analysis. According to the SCAQMD, Southern California is divided into 41 Source Receptor Areas. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors are residents at the multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet (15 meters) north of the project site. According to LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25-meter thresholds. Table 4 presents the proposed project ’s maximum daily on-site emissions compared with the applicable LSTs. Emissions estimates account for implementation of SCAQMD Rule 403, which is required for all projects regardless of significance. 11 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). (2006). Final –Methodology to Calculate Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 and PM 2.5 Significance Thresholds. October. Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized- significance-thresholds/particulate-matter-(pm)-2.5-significance-thresholds -and-calculation- methodology/final_pm2_5methodology.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed March 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 37 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 5: Comparison of Construction LSTs and Project Construction Emissions Activity Maximum On-site Emissions (pounds per day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 16.79 14.06 1.42 0.88 Site Preparation 14.66 7.14 3.08 1.75 Grading 17.19 9.32 3.55 2.03 Building Construction—2022 12.56 12.89 0.65 0.58 Combined Building Construction, Paving and Architectural Coatings – 2023 20.10 23.58 1.08 0.95 Maximum Daily Construction Emissions 20.10 23.58 3.55 2.03 Construction Localized Significance Threshold1 100 12 5 7 Exceed Threshold? No No No No Notes: CO = carbon monoxide NOX = nitrogen oxides PM10 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns Phases are assumed to not overlap; therefore, the maximum daily emissions are from the highest representative phase. PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are from the mitigated output to reflect compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403—Fugitive Dust. 1 The nearest off -site sensitive receptors to the project site are multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet (15 meters) north of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25-meter threshold. Source of emissions: CalEEMod Output (Appendix A). Source of thresholds: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2009, for Source Receptor Area 17, 25 meters, 5-acre site. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project ’s maximum daily on-site emissions would not exceed any of the applicable SCAQMD LSTs. Therefore, the proposed project ’s construction activities would not cause or contribute substantially to an existing or future ambient air quality standard violation. Accordingly, the proposed project ’s construction-related criteria air pollutant and ozone precursor concentrations would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. This impact would be less than significant. Localized Operational Analysis Similar to the construction LST analysis above, the applicable operational LSTs were obtained for a project located in Source Receptor Area 17. As described above, the LST Methodology recommends that only on-site emissions are evaluated using LSTs. Because a majority of the proposed project ’s mobile-source emissions would occur on the local and regional roadway network away from the project site, only the on-site area-, energy-, and mobile-source emissions were included in this analysis. Table 6 presents the proposed project’s maximum daily on-site emissions compared with the applicable LSTs. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 38 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 6: Comparison of Operational LSTs and Project Operational Emissions(Unmitigated) Operational Activity On-site Emissions (pounds per day)1 NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 Area 0.03 2.80 0.02 0.02 Energy 0.14 0.06 0.01 0.01 Mobile 0.02 0.15 0.04 0.01 Maximum On-site Daily Emissions 0.19 3.02 0.06 0.04 Operations Localized Significance Threshold 100 612 2 1 Exceed Threshold? No No No No Notes: CO = carbon monoxide NOX= nitrogen oxides PM10 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 = particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District Unmitigated results were used to calculate totals. 1 The nearest off -site sensitive receptors to the project site are multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet (15 meters) north of the project site. According to SCAQMD methodology, all receptors closer than 25 meters are based on the 25- meter threshold. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Lookup Tables for one and two acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. As shown in Table 5, the proposed project ’s maximum daily on-site operational emissions would not exceed any of the applicable SCAQMD LSTs. Therefore, the proposed project ’s operational activities would not cause or contribute substantially to an existing or future ambient air quality standard violation. Accordingly, the proposed project ’s operational criteria air pollutant and ozone precursor concentrations would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. This impact would be less than significant. Toxic Air Pollutants—On-site Workers A variety of state and national programs protect workers from safety hazards, including high air pollutant concentrations, according to the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).12 On-site workers are not required to be addressed through this Health Risk Assessment (HRA) process. A document published by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, indicates that on-site receptors are included in risk assessments if they are persons not employed by the project.13 Persons not 12 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2012. Healthy Housing Reference Manual, Chapter 5: Indoor Air Pollutants and Toxic Materials. Website: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/publications/books/housing/cha05.htm. Accessed March 16, 2022. 13 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2009. Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects. Website: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 39 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx employed by the proposed project would not remain on-site for any significant period. Therefore, an HRA for on-site workers is not required or recommended. Toxic Air Pollutants—Construction Construction activities associated with the proposed project are anticipated to generate TAC emissions from diesel particulate matter (DPM) associated with the operation of trucks and off-road equipment and from possible asbestos in the structures to be demolished. Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions The greatest potential for TAC emissions would be related to DPM emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of “individual cancer risk.” “Individual cancer risk” is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of TACs over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology. It should be noted that the most current cancer risk assessment methodology recommends analyzing a 30-year exposure period for the nearby sensitive receptors.14 Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment, the varying distances that construction equipment would operate to the nearby sensitive receptors, and the short-term construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 30 or 70 years) substantial source of TAC emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. In addition, California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 regulates emissions from off-road diesel equipment in California. This regulation limits idling of equipment to no more than 5 minutes and requires equipment operators to label each piece of equipment and provide annual reports to ARB of their fleet’s usage and emissions. This regulation also requires systematic upgrading of the emission Tier level of each fleet, and currently no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 0 or Tier 1 equipment, and by January 2023 no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 2 equipment. In addition to the purchase restrictions, equipment operators need to meet fleet average emissions targets that become more stringent each year between years 2014 and 2023. As of January 2019, 25 percent or more of all contractors’ equipment fleets must be Tier 2 or higher. Therefore, no significant short-term TAC impacts from DPM emissions would occur during construction of the proposed project. Asbestos Emissions It is possible that the existing on-site structures to be demolished contain asbestos. According to SCAQMD Rule 1403 requirements, prior to the start of demolition activities, the existing structures located on-site shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of asbestos by a person that is certified by Cal/OSHA for asbestos surveys. Rule 1403 requires that the SCAQMD be notified a minimum of 10 days before any demolition activities begin with specific details of all asbestos to be removed, start and completion dates of demolition, work practices and engineering controls to be used to contain the asbestos emissions, estimates on the amount of asbestos to be removed, the name of the waste disposal site where the asbestos will be taken, and names and addresses of all contractors and 14 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. February. Website: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 40 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx transporters that will be involved in the asbestos removal process. Therefore, through adherence to the asbestos removal requirements, detailed in SCAQMD Rule 1403, a less than significant asbestos impact would occur during construction of the proposed project. As such, construction of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Toxic Air Pollutants—Operations Common sources of TACs include high-traffic freeways, distribution centers, large gas-dispensing facilities, and dry cleaners. The proposed project would not include those uses and therefore would not emit TACs. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The analysis provided in Appendix A, Section 10.3, Impact Analysis, shows that no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of off-site sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from On -site Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the proposed project would occur from on-site sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and on-site usage of natural gas appliances. The analysis provided in Appendix A, Section 10.3, Impact Analysis, found that the operation of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOX, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Appendix A, Section 9.2, Thresholds of Significance. Therefore, the ongoing operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations-related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions, and no mitigation would be required. Operations-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition prepared by the ARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde, have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Because of the nominal number of diesel truck trips that are anticipated to be generated by the ongoing operation of the proposed townhomes, a less than significant TAC impact would be created from the ongoing operations of the proposed project, and no mitigation would be required. d) Result in other emission (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less than significant impact. Odors can cause a variety of responses. The impact of an odor is dependent on interacting factors such as frequency (how often), intensity (strength), duration (in City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 41 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx time), offensiveness (unpleasantness), location, and sensory perception. While offensive odors rarely cause any physical harm, they still can be very unpleasant, leading to considerable distress and often generating citizen complaints to local governments and regulatory agencies. Odor-related symptoms reported in a number of studies include nervousness, headache, sleeplessness, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, loss of appetite, stomachache, sinus congestion, eye irritation, nose irritation, runny nose, sore throat, cough, and asthma exacerbation.15 The SCAQMD’s role is to protect the public’s health from air pollution by overseeing and enforcing regulations. The SCAQMD’s resolution activity for odor compliance is mandated under California Health and Safety Code Section 41700, and falls under SCAQMD Rule 402. This rule states, “A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.” Construction-related Odors Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include exhaust from diesel construction equipment. However, because of the temporary nature of these emissions, the intermittent nature of construction activities, and the highly diffusive properties of DPM exhaust, nearby receptors would not be affected by diesel exhaust odors associated with project construction. Odors from these sources would be localized and generally confined to the immediate area surrounding the project site. The proposed project would utilize typical construction techniques, and the odors would be typical of most construction sites and temporary in nature. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational-related Odors The proposed project would develop multi-family residential uses that would not be considered typical odor-generating land uses. Land uses typically considered associated with odors include wastewater treatment facilities, waste disposal facilities, or agricultural operations. Minor sources of odors, such as exhaust from mobile sources, are not typically associated with numerous odor complaints, but are known to have temporary and less concentrated odors. The vehicle trips generated by the proposed project would occur throughout the day, so the exhaust would not be heavily concentrated for extended periods. Considering the low intensity of potential odor emissions, the proposed project ’s operational activities would not expose receptors to objectionable odor emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None required. 15 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).2007 Air Quality Management Plan. June. Website: https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan/2007-air-quality-management-plan. Accessed March 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 42 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.4 Biological Resources Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan? Environmental Evaluation Setting The findings of this section are based, in part, on the results of the site visit conducted on August 2, 2021, by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS) Biologist Kimberly Gibson, and are included in Appendix B. The project site is located in highly developed and urbanized area of the City of Anaheim. The project site consists of office buildings and a parking lot, with most currently in operations as doctor offices and pharmacies. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 43 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Vegetation present is entirely ornamental with several jacaranda trees (Jacaranda mimosifolia) and palms trees present as well as ornamental shrubs and plotted plants in front of some of the operational buildings. There are several of patches of lawn grasses with lavender (Lavandula sp.), pothos (Epipremnum aureum), agave (Agave sp.), and heavenly bamboo (Nandina domestica). Wildlife activity during the site visit was low and consisted entirely of avian species. Species observed included rock pigeons (Columba livia), Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), and house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus). Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. An FCS Biologist reviewed the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), a special- status species and plant community account database, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system, and the California Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI) of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California database for the Anaheim, California USGS 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle Map and its eight neighboring quads.16,17,18 The literature search found that 43 special-status plant species and 45 special-status animal species have been recorded within the regional vicinity of the project site. Of these species, eight special- status plants and 17 special-status animal species have been recorded within 5 miles of the project site (Appendix B). The overwhelming majority of these species are not expected to occur due to the lack of suitable habitat on the project site, the project site being situated outside of their known geographic range or have been have locally extirpated due to extensive urbanization and habitat modification of the surrounding area. No special-status plant species are expected to occur due the lack of natural vegetation communities and lack of suitable natural substrate present on-site. The project site is entirely developed and contains little suitable habitat for most special-status animal species. The site does contain over a dozen of ornamental trees of sufficient size to provide suitable nesting locations for native migratory or resident birds that are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and/or CDFW Code. Additionally, smaller birds could nest within the eaves of the existing buildings or on top of the several light posts and telephone poles found on- site. Suitable nesting trees are present on properties immediately adjacent the project site as well. As a result, there is still potential, albeit very low potential, that special-status birds may choose to nest on-site or within the immediate vicinity. 16 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2021. CNDDB RareFind 5 California Natural Diversity Database Query for Special- Status Species. Website: https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind/view /RareFind.aspx. Accessed May 6, 2021. 17 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021 Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC). Website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed May 6, 2021. 18 California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2020. California Native Plant Society Rare and Endangered Plant Inventory (CNPSEI). Website: http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. Accessed May 6, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 44 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The development of the proposed project has the potential to impact protected bird nests due to the removal of this vegetation or indirectly harm birds though the generation of noise, lights, and other man-made disturbances that could result in the abandonment of eggs or young. Compliance with the regulatory requirements of the federal MBTA and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, which protect active nests of avian species including common raptor species. As per MM BIO-1, removal of trees and vegetation shall be avoided during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31). If site preparation activities are proposed during the nesting/breeding season, a qualified Biologist shall prepare a pre-construction survey within 72 hours prior to vegetation removal to determine whether active nests of species protected by the MBTA or the CDFW Code are present in the construction zone. With implementation of MM BIO-1 impacts related to candidate, sensitive, or special-status species would be less than significant. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service? No impact. The project site is entirely developed and surrounded by extensive urban development in all directions. The site does not contain any naturally occurring vegetation communities that could be considered as sensitive such as riparian or coastal sage scrub habitats. Therefore, no impact would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No impact. The project site is entirely developed and no wetlands or other hydrological features that meet criteria as waters of the United States or waters of the State are present within the proposed project site. Additionally, the project site is not located adjacent to any known potentially jurisdictional water body. No impact would occur. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? Less than significant impact. The project site is entirely developed and is surrounded in all directions by extensive urban development, including roadways and other man-made structures that serve as barriers to wildlife movement. Therefore, no impact would occur. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation p olicy or ordinance? No impact. The project site contains 19 ornamental trees including 12 Mexican fan palms (Washingtonia robusta), two queen palms (Syagrus romanzoffiana), two jacaranda trees (Jacaranda mimosifolia) and three beaked yuccas (Yucca rostrata). All 19 trees would need to be removed to accommodate the proposed project. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 45 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx FCS reviewed the Anaheim Municipal Code regarding any applicable ordinances regarding tree preservation. 19 The project site is not located within the Scenic Corrdior Overlay Zone where additional tree preservation ordinances would apply.20 The project site does not contain any “Landmark Trees” as defined by the Anaheim Municipal Code. None of the trees present on-site are located along the planting strip bordering Broadway and therefore likely do not meet the City’s definition as a “Street Tree” and be subject to the City’s Street Tree Ordinance.21 Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to conflicts with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State Habitat Conservation Plan? No impact. The proposed project lies within boundaries the OCTA Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan, but it is not applicable to the proposed project.22 This plan only applies to highway improvement and does not apply to mixed use developments such as the proposed project. Therefore, no impact would occur. Mitigation Measures MM BIO-1 Protection of Active Bird Nests (includes pre-construction survey and implementation of avoidance buffer, if found). 1. The removal of trees and vegetation shall be avoided during the nesting season (generally February 1 to August 31), if feasible. If avoidance of tree and vegetation removal during the nesting season is infeasible, then the following measures shall be required: a. If ground-disturbing or vegetation-removing construction activities occur during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31), pre-construction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within 72 hours prior to scheduled tree removal, to determine whether or not active nests are present in the construction zone. b. If an active nest is located during pre-construction surveys, a qualified Biologist shall determine an appropriately sized avoidance buffer based on the species and anticipated disturbance level. A qualified Biologist shall delineate the avoidance buffer using Environmentally Sensitive Area fencing, pin flags, and or yellow caution tape. The buffer zone shall be maintained around the active nest site(s) until the young have fledged and are foraging independently. No construction activities or construction foot traffic is allowed to occur within the avoidance buffer(s). 19 Anaheim Municipal Code. 2021. City of Anaheim. Website: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/anaheim/latest/overview. Accessed May 6, 2021. 20 Anaheim Municipal Code. 2021. Chapter 18.18.040 Tree Preservation. City of Anaheim. Website: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/anaheim/latest/anaheim_ca/0-0-0-66504. Accessed April 14, 2021. 21 Anaheim Municipal Code. 2021. Chapter 13.12 STREET TREES*. City of Anaheim. Website: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/anaheim/latest/overview. Accessed April 14, 2021. 22 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2020. NCCP Plan Summaries. Website: https://wildlife.ca.gov/conservation/planning/nccp/plans. Accessed April 6, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 46 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx c. The qualified Biologist shall monitor the active nest during construction activities to prevent any potential impacts that may result from the construction of the proposed project, until the young have fledged. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 47 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.5 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as pursuant to Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: d) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or e) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Environmental Evaluation Setting This section describes the existing cultural resources and Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) setting and potential impacts from project implementation. The descriptions and analysis in this section are based, in part, on information provided by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), California Historical Landmarks list, California Points of Historical Interest list (CPHI), California Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for Orange County. Relevant non-confidential records search results, NAHC correspondence, and paleontological reports are provided in Appendix C. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 48 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx South Central Coastal Information Center A records search and literature review were conducted on September 23, 2021, at the SCCIC located at California State University, Fullerton for the project site and the 0.5-mile radius surrounding the project site. The purpose of this review was to access existing cultural resource survey reports, archaeological site records, historic aerial photographs, and historic maps and evaluate whether any previously documented prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, cultural landscapes, or other resources exist within or near the project site. The results from the records search indicated that there are 10 historical resources recorded within the 0.5-mile search radius, none of which are located within the project site. In addition, eight area- specific survey reports are on file with the SCCIC for the 0.5-mile search radius, none of which are within the project site itself, suggesting that the project site has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources. A records search map identifying the project boundaries and a 0.5-mile search radius along with relevant non-confidential records search results can be found in Appendix C. Pedestrian Survey and Site Visit On October 6, 2021, FCS Staff Archaeologist, Natalie Adame conducted a pedestrian survey for unrecorded cultural resources at the project site. The survey covered the subject property in its entirety, beginning in the northeast corner of the project site and moving west, using north–south transects spaced at standard 15-meter intervals whenever possible. The project site is entirely developed, consisting of several medical offices, a residential unit and minor associated landscaping elements. Visibility of native soils was therefore very poor, less than 5 percent, and only in areas of minor landscaping. Soils in sections of poor visibility were intermittently inspected using a hand trowel. Observed soils consisted of yellowish-brown silty sand (Munsell 10YR 5/6). Survey conditions were documented using digital photographs and field notes. During the survey, Ms. Adame examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., fire-affected rock, milling tools, flaked stone tools, tool-making debris, ceramics), soil discoloration and depressions that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human osteological remains, and features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., postholes, standing exterior walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, metal, ceramics). Particular attention was paid to the built environment and recording buildings and structures that appeared to be over 45 years of age. A review of historic aerials indicates that there are two structures over the age of 45 located within the project boundaries that have not been previously evaluated. All areas of the project site were closely inspected for culturally modified soils or other indicators of potential historic or prehistoric resources. No prehistoric cultural resources or raw materials commonly used in the manufacture of tools (e.g., obsidian, Franciscan chert) were observed. Native American Heritage Commission On July 29, 2021, FCS sent a request to the NAHC on behalf of the City of Anaheim in an effort to determine whether any sacred sites are listed on its Sacred Lands File (SLF) for the project site and its 0.5-mile search radius, and to receive a consultation list of any tribal representatives who may be interested in consulting on the project pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 52. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 49 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx A response was received on August 27, 2022, indicating that the SLF search results did not locate the presence of Native American cultural resources in the immediate project area. The NAHC included a list of 17 tribal representatives available for consultation. To ensure that all Native American knowledge and concerns over potential TCRs that may be affected by the project are addressed, FCS sent a letter containing project information and requesting any additional information to each Tribal Representative on September 2, 2021. On November 23, 2021, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested full-time monitoring during all ground-disturbing activities and that their recommendations be included as mitigation measures within the CEQA document. On December 20, 2021, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians requested full-time monitoring during ground disturbance in native soil. The tribe also provided recommendations that have been included as mitigation measures within the CEQA document. Historic Built Environment Assessment In California, the term “historical resource” includes but is not limited to “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California” (California Public Resources Code [PRC] § 5020.1(j)) The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR (enumerated below) were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP. According to California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c) (1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (1) retains “substantial integrity,” and (2) meets at least one of the following criteria: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Two built environment resources more than 45 years old were identified within the project site: 1661 West Broadway constructed circa 1958 and 1673 West Broadway constructed circa 1963. The buildings were recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Forms in consideration of CRHR and City designation criteria and integrity requirements (Appendix C). The property was found ineligible under all designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No historical resources were identified within the project site as a result of this study. Cultural Resources Would the project: Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 50 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 defines “historic resources” as resources listed in the CRHR, a local register, determined significant by the Lead Agency, or determined to be eligible by the California Historical Resources Commission for listing in the CRHR. The criteria for eligibility are generally set by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, which established the NRHP, and which recognizes properties that are significant at the national, State, and local levels. To be eligible for listing in the NRHP and CRHR, a district, site, building, structure, or object must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association relative to American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture. In addition, unless the property possesses exceptional significance, it must be at least 50 years old to be eligible. The records search conducted at the SCCIC for the project site determined that 10 historical resources have been recorded within the 0.5-mile search radius, none of which are located the project site. Additionally, the pedestrian survey identified two potentially historic structures, which was evaluated by South Environmental, included in Appendix C, and was found ineligible under all designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. No other potential resources were identified during the pedestrian survey; however, it is possible that earthmoving activities associated with project construction could encounter previously undiscovered historical resources. Historical resources can include but are not limited to stone, bone, or wood artifacts or features, or sites including privies, standing structures, or fences. Damage or destruction of these resources would be a potentially significant impact; thus, implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-1 would establish a procedure for handling historical resources that may be discovered prior to and during project construction. Therefore, impacts associated with historical resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines defines significant archaeological resources as resources that meet the criteria for historical resources, as discussed above, or resources that constitute unique archaeological resources. A project-related significant adverse effect could occur if a project were to affect archaeological resources that fall under these categories. The records search conducted at the SCCIC for the project site and its 0.5-mile surrounding radius, failed to identify any archaeological resources. In addition, the results of the pedestrian survey did not locate or identify any archaeological resources. Nevertheless, it is possible that earthmoving activities associated with project construction could encounter previously undiscovered archaeological resources. Archaeological resources can include but are not limited to stone, bone, wood or shell artifacts or features, including hearths and structural elements. Damage or destruction of these resources would be a potentially significant impact. Implementation of MM CUL-1 would ensure that this potential impact is reduced to a less than significant level. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 51 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. No human remains or cemeteries are known to exist within or near the project site. Although human remains within the project site are unlikely, there is always the possibility that earthmoving activities associated with project construction could potentially damage or destroy previously undiscovered human remains. This would be a potentially significant impact. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.94 and 5097.98 must be followed. MM CUL-2 further specifies the procedures to follow in the event human remains are uncovered. Along with compliance with these guidelines and statutes, implementation of this mitigation would reduce potential impacts related to human remains to a less than significant level. Tribal Cultural Resources Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: d) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The records search conducted at the SCCIC, which included a search of the CRHR, did not identify any listed or eligible TCR s that would be adversely affected by the proposed project. Additionally, the NAHC SLF’s search results did not identify any TCRs in the project vicinity. Should any undiscovered TCRs be encountered during project construction, implementation of MM CUL-1 and MM CUL-2, would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. e) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. No TCRs significant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 have been identified by the Lead Agency. FCS conducted tribal outreach with the 17 tribal representatives identified by the NAHC. In compliance with AB 52, the City distributed letters to Native American tribes that have previously requested notification for AB 52 consultation, notifying each tribe of the opportunity to consult with the City regarding the proposed project. Consultation letters were mailed on September 2, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 52 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx On November 23, 2021, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested full-time monitoring during all ground-disturbing activities and that their recommendations be included as mitigation measures within the CEQA document. On December 20, 2021, the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians requested full-time monitoring during ground disturbance in native soil. The tribe also provided recommendations to be included as mitigation measures within the CEQA document. To reduce potential impacts, and consistent with input from tribal representatives, should any undiscovered TCRs be encountered during project construction, implementation of MM CUL-1 and CUL-2, in addition to the MM TCR-1 through MM TCR-3 provided by the Juaneño Band of Mission Indians and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation, would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures MM CUL-1 An Archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Archaeology shall perform an inspection of the site for potential archaeological resources once grubbing, ground clearing, and demolition are complete, and prior to any grading or project-related ground disturbance. In the event exposed soils indicate cultural materials may be present, this may be followed by regular or periodic archaeological monitoring as determined by the Archaeologist, but full-time archaeological monitoring is not required at this time. It is always possible that ground-disturbing activities during construction may uncover previously unknown, buried cultural resources . In the event that buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project area should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria. If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeological Monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds. No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 53 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study. MM CUL-2 In the event of an accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project- related earthmoving begins and if there is accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken: 1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendant (MLD) may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Section 5097.98, or 2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance: • The NAHC is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission. • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner. Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures MM TCR-1 Retention of a Native American Monitor Prior to Commencement of Ground-Disturbing Activities Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall coordinate with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians–Kizh Nation Native American tribe in retention of a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 54 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx that involve ground-disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). MM TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects Upon discovery of any archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Section Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 55 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx MM TCR-3 Procedures for Burials and Funerary Remains In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the owner/developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The owner/developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the owner/developer to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity shall cease until consultation with the MLD is complete regarding recommendations pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. Discovery of human remains shall also follow CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. MM TCR-4 Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, the owner/developer shall retain a Native American Monitor (Tribal Monitor) and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Tribal Monitor shall only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground- disturbing activities within undisturbed native sediments. Ground-disturbing activities may include, but are not limited to, demolition of existing structures, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project site. The Tribal Monitor shall complete daily monitoring logs that shall provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Tribal Monitor have indicated that the project site has a low potential for impacting archaeological or Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs). Upon discovery of any archaeological or TCRs, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological and/or TCRs unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Archaeologist and Tribal Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribal Representative shall coordinate with the owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe shall request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines SS 15064.5(f)). If a resource is determined by the qualified Archaeologist to Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 56 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, the Copper Center, or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. In the event that human remains are uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, the project developer shall cease ground-disturbing activities and contact the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist to inform of the discovery. The project developer shall coordinate and consult with the County Coroner, Tribal Monitor, and Archaeologist for advisory on the matter, protocol, and any applicable mitigating requirements. Additionally, If the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Most Likely Descendant (MLD), as the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be contacted by the project developer to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains. To protect the area in which the Native American human remains are present, development activity shall cease until consultation with the MLD is complete regarding recommendations pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. Discovery of human remains shall also follow CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; Public Resources Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Section 5097.98. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 57 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.6 Energy Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Environmental Evaluation Setting A significant energy use impact would occur if the proposed project would result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction or operational activities. The proposed project would be determined to conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency if construction and operation of the buildings and appliances would not adhere to the energy use reduction measures included in the California Green Building Code or required by the City of Anaheim. This analysis is partly based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis West Broadway Townhomes Project, Vista Environmental, March 4, 2022, included in Appendix A. Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less than significant impact. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project would result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy. The proposed project would impact energy resources during construction and operation. Energy resources that would be potentially impacted include electricity, natural gas, and petroleum-based fuel supplies and distribution systems. This analysis includes a discussion of the potential energy impacts of the proposed project, with particular emphasis on avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. A general definition of each of these energy resources are provided below. Electricity, a consumptive utility, is a man-made resource. The production of electricity requires the consumption or conversion of energy resources, including water, wind, oil, gas, coal, solar, geothermal, and nuclear resources, into energy. The delivery of electricity involves a number of system components, including substations and transformers that lower transmission line power Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 58 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx (voltage) to a level appropriate for on-site distribution and use. The electricity generated is distributed through a network of transmission and distribution lines commonly called a power grid. Conveyance of electricity through transmission lines is typically responsive to market demands. In 2019, the City of Anaheim Public Utilities provided 2,085.89 Gigawatt-hours per year of electricity to the City.23 Natural gas is a combustible mixture of simple hydrocarbon compounds (primarily methane) that is used as a fuel source. Natural gas consumed in California is obtained from naturally occurring reservoirs, mainly located outside the State, and delivered through high-pressure transmission pipelines. The natural gas transportation system is a nationwide network and, therefore, resource availability is typically not an issue. Natural gas satisfies almost one-third of the State’s total energy requirements and is used in electricity generation, space heating, cooking, water heating, industrial processes, and as a transportation fuel. Natural gas is measured in terms of cubic feet. In 2020, Orange County consumed 594.63 million therms of natural gas.24 Petroleum-based fuels currently account for a majority of the California’s transportation energy sources and primarily consist of diesel and gasoline types of fuels. However, the State has been working on developing strategies to reduce petroleum use. Over the last decade California has implemented several policies, rules, and regulations to improve vehicle efficiency, increase the development and use of alternative fuels, reduce air pollutants and GHG emissions from the transportation sector, and reduce VMT. Accordingly, petroleum-based fuel consumption in California has declined. In 2017, 1,382 million gallons of gasoline and 61 million gallons of diesel was sold in Orange County.25 The following section calculates the potential energy consumption associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and provides a determination if any energy utilized by the proposed project is wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Construction Energy The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the three existing office buildings and associated driveways and parking lots on the project site; site preparation and grading of the 1.55-acre project site; construction of the townhomes; paving of the on-site roads and parking areas, sidewalks, and hardscapes; and application of architectural coatings. The proposed project would consume energy resources during construction in three general forms: • Petroleum-based fuels used to power off-road construction vehicles and equipment on the project site, construction worker travel to and from the project site, as well as delivery and haul truck trips (e.g., hauling of demolition material to off-site reuse and disposal facilities); 23 California Energy Commission. 2016. Electricity Consumption by Entity. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyutil.aspx. Accessed March 16, 2022. 24 California Energy Commission. 2016. Gas Consumption by County. Website: http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx. Accessed March 16, 2022. 25 California Energy Commission. 2019. Gasoline Listing. Website: https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/. Accessed March 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 59 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx • Electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power; and, • Energy used in the production of construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass. Construction-Re lated Electricity During construction, the proposed project would consume electricity to construct the new structures and infrastructure. Electricity would be supplied to the project site by Anaheim Public Utilities and would be obtained from the existing electrical lines in the vicinity of the project site. The use of electricity from existing power lines rather than temporary diesel or gasoline powered generators would minimize impacts on energy use. Electricity consumed during project construction would vary throughout the construction period based on the construction activities being performed. Various construction activities include electricity associated with the conveyance of water that would be used during project construction for dust control (supply and conveyance) and electricity to power any necessary lighting during construction, electronic equipment, or other construction activities necessitating electrical power. Such electricity demand would be temporary, nominal, and would cease upon the completion of construction. Overall, construction activities associated with the proposed project would require limited electricity consumption that would not be expected to have an adverse impact on available electricity supplies and infrastructure. Therefore, the use of electricity during project construction would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Since the project site already has electrical service, it is anticipated that only nominal improvements would be required to Anaheim Public Utilities distribution lines and equipment with development of the proposed project. Where feasible, the new service installations and connections would be scheduled and implemented in a manner that would not result in electrical service interruptions to other properties. Compliance with City’s guidelines and requirements would ensure that the proposed project fulfills its responsibilities relative to infrastructure installation, coordinates any electrical infrastructure removals or relocations, and limits any impacts associated with demolition, grading, construction, and development. Construction of the project’s electrical infrastructure is not anticipated to adversely affect the electrical infrastructure serving the surrounding uses or utility system capacity. Construction-Related Natural Gas Construction of the proposed project typically would not involve the consumption of natural gas. Natural gas would not be supplied to support construction activities, thus there would be no demand generated by construction. Since the project site is adjacent to roads that currently have natural gas lines, construction of the proposed project would be limited to installation of new natural gas connections within the project site. Development of the proposed project would likely not require extensive infrastructure improvements to serve the project site. Construction-related energy usage impacts associated with the installation of natural gas connections are expected to be confined to trenching in order to place the lines below surface. In addition, prior to ground Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 60 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx disturbance, the proposed project would notify and coordinate with SoCalGas to identify the locations and depth of all existing gas lines and avoid disruption of gas service. Therefore, construction-related impacts to natural gas supply and infrastructure would be less than significant. Construction-Related Petroleum Fuel Use Petroleum-based fuel usage represents the highest amount of transportation energy potentially consumed during construction, which would be utilized by both off-road equipment operating on the project site and on-road automobiles transporting workers to and from the project site and on- road trucks transporting equipment and supplies to the project site. The off-road construction equipment fuel usage was calculated through use of the off-road equipment assumptions and fuel use assumptions shown in Appendix A, Section 8.2, Energy Use Calculations, which found that the off-road equipment utilized during construction of the proposed project would consume 32,033 gallons of fuel. The on-road construction trips fuel usage was calculated through use of the construction vehicle trip assumptions and fuel use assumptions shown in Appendix A, Section 8.2, Energy Use Calculations, which found that the on-road trips generated from construction of the proposed project would consume 7,875 gallons of fuel. As such, the combined fuel used from off-road construction equipment and on-road construction trips for the proposed project would result in the consumption of 39,908 gallons of petroleum fuel. This equates to 0.003 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed annually in Orange County. As such, the construction-related petroleum use would be nominal when compared to current countywide petroleum usage rates. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be required to adhere to all State and SCAQMD regulations for off-road equipment and on-road trucks, which provide minimum fuel efficiency standards. As such, construction activities for the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Impacts regarding transportation energy would be less than significant. Development of the project would not result in the need to manufacture construction materials or create new building material facilities specifically to supply the proposed project. It is difficult to measure the energy used in the production of construction materials such as asphalt, steel, and concrete; however, it is reasonable to assume that the production of building materials such as concrete, steel, etc., would employ all reasonable energy conservation practices in the interest of minimizing the cost of doing business. Operational Energy The ongoing operation of the proposed project would require the use of energy resources for multiple purposes including, but not limited to heating, ventilating, air conditioning (HVAC), refrigeration, lighting, appliances, and electronics. Energy would also be consumed during operations related to water usage, solid waste disposal, landscape equipment and vehicle trips. Operations-Related Electricity Operation of the proposed project would result in consumption of electricity at the project site. As detailed in Appendix A, Section 8.2, Energy Use Calculations, the proposed project would consume 58,953 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year of electricity. This equates to 0.0028 percent of the electricity City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 61 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx consumed annually by Anaheim Public Utilities. As such, the operations-related electricity use would be nominal when compared to current electricity usage rates in the City. It should be noted that the proposed project would be required to meet the 2019 Title 24, Part 6 building energy efficiency standards that have been developed to meet the State’s goal of zero net energy use for new homes. The zero net energy use would be achieved through a variety of measures to make new homes more energy efficient and by also requiring installation of photovoltaic (PV) systems of adequate size to generate enough electricity to meet the zero-net energy use standard. The size of the PV system required for the project pursuant to the 2019 Title 24 standards was calculated above in Section 8.1, CalEEMod Model Input Parameters, which found that the proposed project would need to install at least 43.3 kilowatts (kW) of PV panels within the proposed project. Although, the CalEEMod model found that with implementation of the 2019 Title 24 Part 6 standards, that the proposed project would continue to utilize a nominal amount of power, it should be noted that the electricity usage and emission rates utilized by the CalEEMod model are based on regional average usage rates for existing homes, which were not all built to the most current Title 24 Part 6, standards, so the CalEEMod model provides a conservative or worst-case analysis of electricity use from the proposed project. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize electricity use and that existing and planned electricity capacity and electricity supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s electricity demand. Thus, impacts with regard to electrical supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations-Related Natural Gas Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of natural gas at the project site. As detailed in Appendix A, Section 8.2, Energy Use Calculations, the proposed project would consume 561 kilo-British Thermal Unit (kBTU) per year of natural gas. This equates to 0.0009 percent of the natural gas consumed annually in Orange County. As such, the operations-related natural gas use would be nominal, when compared to current natural gas usage rates in the County. It should be noted that the proposed project would comply with all federal, State, and County requirements related to the consumption of natural gas, which includes California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen). California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 and Part 11 standards require numerous energy efficiency measures to be incorporated into the proposed structures, including enhanced insulation as well as use of efficient natural gas appliances and HVAC units. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize natural gas use and that existing and planned natural gas capacity and natural gas supplies would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s natural gas demand. Thus, impacts with regard to natural gas supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. Operations-Related Vehicular Petroleum Fuel Usage Operation of the proposed project would result in increased consumption of petroleum-based fuels related to vehicular travel to and from the project site. As detailed Appendix A, Section 8.2, Energy Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 62 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Use Calculations, the proposed project would consume 19,159 gallons of petroleum fuel per year from vehicle travel. This equates to 0.0013 percent of the gasoline and diesel consumed in Orange County annually. As such, the operations-related petroleum use would be nominal, when compared to current petroleum usage rates. It should be noted that, the proposed project would comply with all federal, State, and City requirements related to the consumption of transportation energy that includes CALGreen that require the proposed project to include EV charging spaces on the project site as well as providing preferred Clean Air vehicle parking spaces. The proposed project would also be located next to the existing Euclid-Broadway OCTA bus stop, which would encourage the use of public transportation. Therefore, it is anticipated the proposed project would be designed and built to minimize transportation energy through the promotion of the use of electric-powered vehicles and it is anticipated that existing and planned capacity and supplies of transportation fuels would be sufficient to support the proposed project’s demand. Thus, impacts with regard transportation energy supply and infrastructure capacity would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. In conclusion, the proposed project would comply with regulatory compliance measures outlined by the State and City related to air quality, GHG emissions, transportation/circulation, and water supply. Additionally, the proposed project would be constructed in accordance with all applicable City Building and Fire Codes. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. The applicable energy plan for the proposed project is the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, adopted May 2004. The proposed project’s consistency with the energy conservation policies from the General Plan are shown in Table 7. Table 7: Proposed Project Compliance with General Plan Energy Conservation Policies General Plan Policy Proposed Project Implementation Actions Continue to maintain and update energy conservation programs and information provided on the City’s website. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable to City Staff for maintain the City’s website. Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling, effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). Consistent. The proposed project would be required to provide a minimum of 43.3 kilowatts (kW) of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels in order to meet the Title 24 Part 6 rooftop solar PV requirements. In addition, the proposed project has been designed to orient buildings to maximize exposure to cooling and the landscape plan has been designed to locate landscaping to shade structures. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 63 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx General Plan Policy Proposed Project Implementation Actions Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. Not Applicable. The proposed project consists of the demolition of the existing structures on the project site and construction of new buildings. No existing structures would remain on-site that could be retrofitted. Continue to provide free energy audits for the public. Not Applicable. The policy is only applicable for the City as a service that the City provides. Source: City of Anaheim 2004. As shown in Table 7, the proposed project would be consistent with all applicable energy conservation policies from the General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 64 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.7 Geology and Soils Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Environmental Evaluation Setting The analysis in this section is based, in part, on the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta), on January 4, 2021, included in Appendix D of this document. Alta conducted a subsurface investigation on December 10, 2020, consisting of the excavation, logging and select sampling of four hollow-stem auger borings up to a maximum depth of 31 feet City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 65 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx and the installation of two five-foot-deep wells for infiltration testing. Laboratory testing was performed on bulk and ring samples obtained during the field investigation. Based on Alta’s findings during the subsurface investigation, the laboratory test results, and previous experience in the area, it is Alta’s opinion that the development of the site is feasible from a geotechnical perspective. Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less than significant impact. The project site is located in Southern California, which is seismically active. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the project site is located in the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province, which characterizes the southwest portion of Southern California where there are major active fault zones. The project site is located in an area that is characterized by a series of parallel, northwest trending faults that exhibit right lateral dip-slip movement. Several large, active fault systems including the Elsinore-Whittier, Newport-Inglewood, and the San Andreas Fault occur in the region surrounding the site. The nearest known active faults (defined by movement occurring less than 11,700 years ago) are the Puente Hills Fault, located 3.2 miles from the project site; the Newport-Inglewood Fault, located 7 miles from the project site; the Elsinore Fault, located 8 miles from the project site; the San Joaquin Hills Fault, located 9.1 miles from the project site; the San José Fault, located 12.2 miles from the project site; and the Palos Verdes Fault, located 16.1 miles from the project site. The project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone.26 The Geotechnical Investigation determined that active faults are not known to exist within the project site, and the site is not within a California State designated earthquake fault zone. Accordingly, the potential for fault surface rupture on the subject site is very low. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less than significant impact. The proposed project could be at risk of strong seismic ground shaking hazards caused by earthquakes along other active regional faults. The 2019 California Building Standards Code (CBC) requires use-modified spectral accelerations and velocities for most structural designs. The proposed project would comply with the seismic design parameters using soil profile types identified in the 2019 CBC, which would minimize the risk of adverse effects from strong seismic ground shaking. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 26 Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta). 2021. Geotechnical Investigation. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 66 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less than significant impact. Seismic agitation of relatively loose saturated sands, silty sands, and some silts can result in a buildup of pore pressure. If the pore pressure exceeds the overburden stre sses, a temporary quick condition known as liquefaction can occur. Liquefaction effects can manifest in several ways including: (1) loss of bearing; (2) lateral spread; (3) dynamic settlement; and (4) flow failure. Lateral spreading has typically been the most damaging mode of failure. In general, the more recent that a sediment has been deposited, the more likely it would be susceptible to liquefaction. Other factors that must be considered are groundwater, confining stresses, relative density, and the intensity and duration of seismically-induced ground shaking. Groundwater was not encountered during Alta’s subsurface investigation to a depth of 31 feet below ground surface (BGS). The seismic hazard zone report for the area indicates that historic high groundwater elevation is greater than 50 feet below the existing ground surface. The site is not located in a liquefaction zone per the seismic hazard map. Based on the depth to groundwater, the Geotechnical Investigation concluded that the potential for liquefaction to occur on-site is considered minimal. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. iv) Landslides? Less than significant impact. According to the Safety Element of the General Plan, landslides have occurred in the steep slopes of the Hill and Canyon area .27 Figure S-2 of the General Plan, which shows area of landslide potential, indicates that the project site is not in an area that has potential for earthquake-induced landslides. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Res ult in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. Grading and construction of the project could expose large amounts of soil and could result in soil erosion if effective erosion control measures are not used. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control are required under National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (CWA ). NPDES requirements for construction projects 1 acre or more in area are set forth in the General Construction Permit issued by the California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ). Furthermore, the proposed project’s land clearing, grading, and construction activities would be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 403 and 403.2 regulating fugitive dust emissions, thus minimizing wind erosion from ground-disturbing activities. The Geotechnical Investigation for the project site also provided recommendations for the site, which are provided in Appendix D and incorporated in MM GEO-1. MM GEO-1 would require the applicant to implement the recommendations related to site preparation and grading, which would minimize soil erosion. Therefore, with implementation of the NPDES requirements and MM GEO-1, the proposed project would not generate substantial erosion. Impacts would be less than significant. 27 City of Anaheim. 2004. City of Anaheim General Plan, Safety Element. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/Doc umentCenter/Home/View/2039. Accessed November 19, 2021. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 67 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Based on the literature review and subsurface investigation conducted as part of the Geotechnical Investigation, the site is underlain by undocumented artificial fill and alluvium. The Geotechnical Investigation determined that the potential for collapse at the project site is minimal and would be minimized with implementation of MM GEO-1, which contains recommendations related to the removal of unsuitable soils. According to Figure S-2 of the General Plan, which shows areas of liquefaction potential, the project site is not in an area that has potential for liquefaction.28 Figure S-2 also indicates that the project site is not at an area that is at risk of landslides. Therefore, impacts related to liquefaction and landslides would be less than significant. Furthermore, the undocumented artificial fill upper portions of young alluvial fan deposits at the project site are considered compressible and unsuitable to support the proposed improvements. Recommended removal depths presented in the Geotechnical Investigation would be implemented pursuant to MM GEO-1. With implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts related to the potential for on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse would be less than significant. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less than significant impact. Expansive soils shrink or swell as the moisture content decreases or increases, which can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the samples taken from the project site were tested to determine the potential for expansion on the project site. Based on the results, it is anticipated that the majority of materials on-site are “very low” to “low” in expansion potential. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No impact. The proposed project would connect to the existing sewer system operated by the City of Anaheim. Septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems would not be used. Therefore, no impact would occur. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less than significant impact with mitigat ion incorporated. As part of the cultural resources assessment, a paleontological records search request was submitted to the Natural History Museum 28 City of Anaheim. 2004. City of Anaheim General Plan, Safety Element. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/Home/View/2039. Accessed November 19, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 68 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx of Los Angeles County and results were received August 5, 2021, and are included in Appendix C. The paleontological record search for this project focused on the Anaheim quadrangle. Only three invertebrate and one microfossil localities are recorded; no significant paleontological resources have been found in the quadrangle. The results indicate that the project site and its surrounding 0.5- mile search area are on Holocene deposits. Holocene deposits are too young to be fossiliferous and therefore have no paleontological potential or sensitivity. Thus, project-related excavations are not expected to disturb any older deposits. However, it is possible that potentially significant prehistoric remains could be found on the project site since buried fossils often go undetected during a walkover survey. Because the potential for paleontological resources exists within the project site and has not yet been examined, MM GEO-2, which provides precautions for incidental findings of paleontological resources on-site, is required. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measures MM GEO-1 The owner/developer would be required to implement the recommendations provided on Page 14 through Page 32 in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Alta California Geotechnical, Inc. (Alta), on January 4, 2021. The Geotechnical recommendations that are explained in detail on Page 14 through Page 32 of the Geotechnical Investigation shall be implemented. These include general earthwork requirements for site preparation, removal of unsuitable soils, over-excavation of building pads, compaction standards, groundwater and seepage, documentation, treatment of removal bottoms, fill placement, moisture content, mixing, import soils, utility trenches, back-cut stability, stormwater infiltration systems, and boundary conditions. Additionally, these include requirements related to structural design, foundation design, foundation systems, slabs, moisture barriers, seismic design, walls, footing excavations, slabs and walkways, concrete design, corrosion, pavement design, as well as lot maintenance, and future plan reviews. The Geotechnical Investigation included in Appendix D is incorporated herein by reference as fully set forth in this mitigation measure. MM GEO-2 If it is determined that fossil-bearing sediments are present on-site, a qualified Monitor shall be required to be present during any ground-disturbing activities during the project. In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction activities, excavations within a 100-foot radius of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted, and the owner/developer shall retain a qualified Paleontologist to examine the discovery. The Paleontologist shall document the discovery in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The Paleontologist shall determine procedures that would be followed before construction activities are allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the owner/developer determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of construction activities on the discovery. The plan shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim for review and approval prior to implementation, and the owner/developer shall adhere to the recommendations in the plan. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 69 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Environmental Evaluation Setting This analysis is partly based on the Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact Analysis West Broadway Townhomes Project, Vista Environmental, March 4, 2022, included in Appendix A. Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are referred to as GHGs. The effect is analogous to the way a greenhouse retains heat. Common GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFC), perfluorocarbons (PFC), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). There have been significant legislative and regulatory activities that directly and indirectly affect climate change and GHGs in California. The primary climate change legislation in California is AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, focusing on reducing GHG emissions in California. The proposed project would generate a variety of GHG emissions during construction and operation, including several defined by AB 32, such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. To describe how much global warming a given type and amount of GHG may cause, the carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is used. The calculation of the CO2e is a consistent methodology for comparing GHG emissions since it normalizes various GHG emissions to a consistent reference gas, CO2. For example, CH4’s warming potential of 25 indicates that CH4 has 25 times greater warming effect than CO2 on a molecule-per-molecule basis. A CO2e is the mass emissions of an individual GHG multiplied by its global warming potential. SCAQMD GHG Thresholds The project site is located within the City of Anaheim and is within the SoCAB, which is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD formed a working group in 2008 to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SoCAB. The working group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document—Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold (Interim GHG Thresholds) that could be applied by lead agencies. The working group has not provided additional guidance since Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 70 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own thresholds. The current interim thresholds consist of the following tiered approach: • Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not a project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. • Tier 2 consists of determining whether a project is consistent with a GHG Reduction Plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG Reduction Plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions. • Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, a project’s impacts are considered less than significant: - All land use types: 3,000 metric tons (MT) CO2e per year. - Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MT CO2e per year; commercial: 1,400 MT CO2e per year; or mixed use: 3,000 MT CO2e per year. • Tier 4 has the following options: - Option 1: Reduce business-as-usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined. - Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures. - Option 3: 2020 target for service population (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MT CO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MT CO2e/SP/year for plans. - Option 3: 2035 target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MT CO2e/SP/year for plans. • Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold. The SCAQMD provided substantial evidence in support of its threshold approach. The SCAQMD discusses its draft thresholds in the following excerpt:29 The overarching policy objective with regard to establishing a GHG significance threshold for the purposes of analyzing GHG impacts pursuant to CEQA is to establish a performance standard or target GHG reduction objective that will ultimately contribute to reducing GHG emissions to stabilize climate change. Full implementation of the Governor’s Executive Order S-3-05 would reduce GHG emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels or 90 percent below current levels by 2050. It is anticipated that achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap GHG concentrations at 450 parts per million (ppm), thus stabilizing global climate. 29 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2008. Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October. Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 71 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx As described below, staff’s recommended interim GHG significance threshold proposal uses a tiered approach to determining significance. Tier 3, which is expected to be the primary tier by which the AQMD will determine significance for projects where it is the lead agency, uses the Executive Order S-3-05 goal as the basis for deriving the screening level. Specifically, the Tier 3 screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects. A 90 percent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to some type of CEQA analysis, including a negative declaration, a mitigated negative declaration, or an environmental impact. In summary, the SCAQMD’s draft threshold uses the Executive Order S-3-05 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate. In 2010, the SCAQMD Tier 3 threshold was expanded to include non-industrial projects, as explained in the minutes from the most recent working group meeting.30 To determine whether the proposed project would have a significant impact with respect to the generation of GHG emissions, this analysis utilizes the SCAQMD’s draft local agency Tier 3 threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e per year for al projects. The City of Anaheim has not adopted a Climate Action Plan or GHG reduction strategy that would be applicable to the proposed project; therefore, the second CEQA Checklist question (Criterion b) is evaluated by assessing the proposed project for its consistency with the ARB’s adopted Scoping Plan and with the ARB’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less than significant impacts. The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The proposed project would consist of a residential development with 34 townhomes. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The City of Anaheim has adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, July 2015, that details measures for the City that includes new development within the City to implement in order to meet the State’s 2030 GHG emission reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 baseline levels. In order to show consistency with the GHG Reduction Plan, quantification of the proposed project’s GHG emissions is not required. As such, the proposed project’s GHG emissions have been provided for 30 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2010. Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15. September 28. Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting -15-minutes.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 72 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx informational purposes only. The project’s GHG emissions have been calculated with the CalEEMod model based on the construction and operational parameters detailed in Appendix A, Section 8.1, CalEEMod Model Input Parameters. A summary of the results is shown below in Table 8, and the CalEEMod model run is provided in Appendix A. Table 8: Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) CO2 CH4 N3O CO2e Area 0.57 <0.00 <0.00 0.59 Energy 71.22 <0.00 <0.00 71.46 Mobile 169.46 0.01 0.01 17.93 Solid Waste 1.59 0.09 <0.00 3.93 Water and Wastewater 26.91 0.06 <0.00 28.81 Construction 12.50 0.17 <0.00 12.61 Total GHG Emissions 282.25 0.17 0.01 289.32 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance 3,000 Notes: CH4 = methane CO2 = carbon dioxide CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent GHG = greenhouse gas N3O = nitrous oxide SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District Sources: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. The data provided in Table 8 shows that the proposed project would create 289.32 MT CO2e per year. For reference purposes Table 8 also shows, the SCAQMD’s draft threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e, which the proposed project would be within this threshold. In addition, as detailed below in Impact 2.8(b), the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable measures in the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, a less than significant generation of GHG would occur from development of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Anaheim Public Utilities adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), July 2015. The GHG Reduction Plan was prepared to assist the City’s power supplies in conforming to the GHG emissions reductions as mandated under AB 32. The GHG Reduction Plan provides a utilities GHG emission reduction targets of 20 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2020 and a 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The Plan provides reduction targets for energy usage, PV rooftop installations, and use of EVs . City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 73 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx For energy usage, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of a 15 percent reduction by 2020 and a 30 percent reduction by 2030 of the energy utilized by homes in the City of Anaheim. This target would be met through application of State regulations including California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6. The 2019 Title 24 Building Standards went into effect on January 1, 2020, and are required to be met for the proposed project’s structures. Homes built with the 2019 Standards will use about 7 percent less energy than the current 2016 Standards. It should also be noted that the 2016 Title 24 Standards included new energy efficiency requirements that resulted in new homes being 15 percent more efficient than the 2013 Title 24 Part 6 Standards that were in effect at the time of the preparation of the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the proposed project would meet the energy use reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. For PV rooftop installations, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 27,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2020 and 37,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2030. This target would be met through application of State regulations including Title 24, Part 6 that requires the proposed project to install a minimum of 43.3 kilowatts of photovoltaic solar panels onto the proposed townhomes. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations the proposed project would assist the City in meeting the PV rooftop installation targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. For EV, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of 2,000 low- or Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV) by 2020 and 5,000 low- or ZEVs by 2030. As detailed on the site plan for the proposed project, the proposed project would provide at least one EV charging station. Therefore, development of the proposed project would assist the City in meeting the EV usage targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. As detailed above, development of the proposed project would meet the targets outlined in the GHG Reduction Plan. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with the GHG Reduction Plan reduction targets and would not conflict with the applicable plan for reducing GHG emissions. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 74 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Environmental Evaluation Setting The analysis in this section is based, in part, on the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) and Phase II ESA prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. (Stantec), on October 23, 2020, included as Appendix E of this document. Based on historical documents, the project site was formerly used for agricultural purposes until the early 1960s. Therefore, the historical use of the project site for agricultural purposes can be a potential environmental concern due to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides containing heavy metals used to prohibit the growth of weeds. Accordingly, Stantec advanced six shallow borings to 3 feet BGS on October 8, 2020, to collect soil City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 75 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx samples for chemical analysis to determine whether pesticides and heavy metals associated with herbicides were present at levels that represent a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) or that are of concern to residential development. Soil samples were collected at the 0.5-1.0-foot interval, 1.5-2.0-feet interval, and the 2.5-3.0-feet interval. The shallow soil sample (0.5-1.0-foot) from the borings were analyzed for organochlorines pesticides (OCPs) by United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test method 8081A and the metals arsenic and lead by EPA test method 6010B. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than significant impact. Construction of the proposed project would include the transport, use, and disposal of limited quantities of hazardous materials necessary for construction, including fuel and solvents. The use of these hazardous materials would be short-term and would be handled in accordance with standard construction practices, as well as with applicable federal, State, and local regulations. The primary regulatory requirements include SCAQMD Rule 1166 volatile organic compound emissions) and Rule 1466 (fugitive dust-toxic air contaminants). The proposed project would include residential development that would not involve hazardous materials, substances, or waste during operation of the proposed project. The proposed project could involve the use of materials associated with routine maintenance of the project site, such as cleaning and landscaping. These uses would not involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of quantities of hazardous materials that could create a significant hazard to the public or environment. These hazardous materials would be stored, handled, and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. Thus, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials with compliance with the regulatory requirements. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. As discussed above, the Phase I ESA and Phase II ESA determined that the project site was previously used for agricultural purposes until the 1960s. Therefore, Stantec identified the possible use of pesticides as a potential REC and collected soil samples for testing. Only one detection of OCPs was detected in one soil sample; however, it was below the EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) residential screening level. No additional OCPs were detected in any of the soil samples. Lead was detected in all six soil samples; however, all of the detections were well below the DTSC residential screening level for lead. Additionally, arsenic was detected in all six soil samples, which are above the EPA RSL for residential use, but within the Southern California regional background levels for arsenic. Based on these results, historical agricultural use does not represent a REC or a human health risk in contemplation of the proposed project. Additionally, as discussed in the Phase I ESA and Phase II ESA, environmental records search conducted for the proposed project identified no RECs, HRECs or de minimis conditions at or near the project site. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 76 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Given the ages of the existing buildings on the project site (circa 1960s), the Phase I ESA and Phase II ESA identified the presence of asbestos -containing materials (ACMs) and lead-based paint (LBP) as probable. Therefore, as detailed in MM HAZ-1, a comprehensive, pre-demolition ACM survey in accordance with the sampling protocol of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) would be conducted prior to any activities with the potential to disturb building materials, in order to determine whether ACM are present. Further, in the event ACM is detected, proper removal and disposal of the materials identified would occur prior to any demolition. In addition, any LBP at the project site would be removed in accordance with all applicable laws, including Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. As such, impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of MM HAZ-1. As discussed in Impact 2.9(a), federal, State, and local laws, regulations address the storage, use, handling, and disposal of any hazardous materials that might be used during construction. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations would reduce the risk of hazardous material incidents during construction to a less than significant level. Therefore, project construction activities would not create a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. During operation, the proposed project would not generate or facilitate the generation of hazardous materials. The proposed project could involve the transport and use of materials associated with routine maintenance of the project site, however, the types and quantities of materials used and stored on-site would not be of a significant quantity to create a reasonably foreseeable upset or accident. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required for operations of the proposed project. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would be located at 1661 to 1673 West Broadway, in the City of Anaheim. The nearest schools to the project site would be the Montessori Education Center (1658 West Broadway), approximately 300 feet across the street from the project site, and Loara Elementary School (1601 West Broadway), approximately 0.15 mile east of the project site. As discussed in Impact 2.9(a), construction of the proposed project would include limited use of hazardous materials, such as fuel and solvents, to operate construction activity. However, use of these hazardous materials would be in compliance with all applicable local, State, and federal regulations. During operation of the proposed project, limited use of hazardous materials would likely be used for building maintenance. Similarly, these hazardous materials would be stored, handled, and disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations. Thus, the proposed project does not propose any uses, which could potentially generate hazardous materials in significant quantities that would have an impact to surrounding schools. Therefore, the schools in close proximity to the project site would not be affected by hazardous emission or materials. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is necessary. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 77 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Less than significant impact. Government Code Section 65962.5 refers to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List, commonly known as the Cortese List, maintained by the DTSC. The Cortese List contains hazardous waste and substance sites as well as hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action; historic Cortese sites; and sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program. The proposed project would not be located on a site which is included on a hazardous materials site list compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5. The closest sites recognized by the Cortese List are approximately 0.25 mile north of the project site are an active Voluntary Cleanup site located at 1687 West Lincoln Avenue and the After 5 Tux Shop, which is classified as a State Response site and is being further evaluated by DTSC for site cleanup.31 None of the activities occurring at these sites would be close enough to the project site to have an impact. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact would occur, and not mitigation is required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? No impact. The proposed project would be located at 1661 to 1673 West Broadway, in the City of Anaheim. The nearest airports to the project site would be Fullerton Municipal Airport, approximately 3.6 miles northwest of the project site, the Joint Forces Training Base Los Alamitos, approximately 7 miles southwest of the project site, and the Long Beach Airport, approximately 12 miles west of the project site. The project site is not within the Airport Influence Areas of these two airports and is not located within an airport land use plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people working or residing at the project site. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than significant impact. The City’s Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), adopted in 2017, establishes a comprehensive framework of policy and guidance for emergency and disaster response operations.32 The EOP provides comprehensive policy and guidance for emergency and response operations, and details the responsibilities of residents, organizations, and City-departments. The City uses Anaheim Alert to contact residents immediately during emergencies to provide information regarding evacuations. However, the EOP does not contain specific evacuation routes. During construction of the proposed project, construction activities would not require the complete closure of West Broadway or any other public or private streets and would be temporary in nature. Thus, construction of the proposed project would not impede the use surrounding roadways for 31 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2022. Envirostor Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List Map. Accessed January 14, 2022. Available: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?global_id=15280010. 32 City of Anaheim. 2017. Emergency Operation Plan. Accessed January 17, 2022. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/21657/City-of-Anaheim-EOP-2017. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 78 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. Operation of the proposed project would not interfere with roadways and would provide internal circulation for emergency vehicle access. Therefore, the proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? No impact. CAL FIRE has mapped fire threat potential throughout California and ranks fire threats on a scale of no fire threat, moderate, high, and very high fire severity. According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone Map Viewer, the project site is located within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA). Land within an LRA is either located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) or a non- VHFHSZ. The project site is designated as a non-VHFHSZ. Further, the project site is in a developed, built-up urban area that is not adjacent to any Very High Fire Hazard Zone (VHFHZ) or wildland areas. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures MM HAZ-1 The owner/developer shall conduct a comprehensive, pre-demolition asbestos- containing materials (ACM) survey in accordance with the sampling protocol of the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) prior to any activities with the potential to disturb building materials, in order to determine whether ACMs are present. The owner/developer shall submit the ACM survey to the City prior to issuance of a demolition permit. In the event that ACMs are detected, the proper removal and disposal, consistent with existing regulations, of the building materials would occur prior to any activities with the potential to disturb them. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 79 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.10 Hydrology and Water Quality Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Environmental Evaluation Setting The analysis in this section is based, in part, on the Preliminary Hydrology Study and the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan for the proposed project prepared by C & V Consulting, Inc., in July 2021, included in Appendix F of this document. Presently, the project site contains approximately 88 percent impervious coverage. Drainage at the project site generally flows in the southern direction toward the West Broadway right-of-way. Stormwater entering West Broadway continues to flow west through catch basins and into an existing City of Anaheim public 42-inch reinforced concrete Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 80 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx storm drainpipe. This drainage facility conveys runoff west to the Carbon Creek Channel at South Dale Avenue. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. The proposed project would include the development of 34 attached, multi-family townhomes with associated resident and guest parking areas and recreational areas. Construction of the proposed project would include the demolition of existing buildings at the project site and grading. The project site would be graded to convey stormwater as surface flow to one proposed curb inlet catch basin near the southern property line of the site on W Broadway. The proposed catch basin would convey low flows to a proposed infiltration system designed to infiltrate the entire Design Capture Volume (DCV), the volume of the stormwater runoff based on design capture storm depth. During storm events that produce a larger runoff volume than the DCV, stormwater could pond in the proposed catch basin and into a proposed storm drainpipe that would convey the overflow into a junction structure and then into the existing 42-inch public storm drainpipe in West Broadway. Emergency (secondary) overflow could pond around the proposed catch basin and sheet flow into the right-of-way of Broadway over the proposed driveway. Upon entering the public storm drain, site runoff would follow the historic drainage pattern and drain to Carbon Creek Channel. During construction, impacts to water quality could occur during demolition and grading when erosion could occur. As discussed under Section 3.8, Geology and Soils, construction of the proposed project could expose large amounts of soil and could result in soil erosion. The proposed project would be subject to the General Construction Permit, NPDES requirements, and the requirements contained within the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), which require the use of BMPs to reduce the project’s impact on water quality. The DAMP contains guidelines on structural and nonstructural BMPs for meeting the NPDES goals, and the General Construction Permit requires the project to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is required to include erosion control BMPs. BMPs include erosion controls, sediment controls, wind erosion controls, tracking controls, non-stormwater management, and waste and materials management. Further, the proposed project would comply with MM GEO-1 requires the applicant to implement the measures related to site preparation and grading contained within the Geotechnical Investigation, which would minimize soil erosion. The Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD), the County of Orange, and the City of Anaheim discharge pollutants from their Municipal Separate Storm sewer System (MS4s). The County’s Low Impact Development (LID) Ordinance requires projects comply with NPDES MS4 Permit water quality requirements. Thus, all new developments and redevelopments that would have at least one acre of impervious surfaces are required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including the proposed project. The Preliminary WQMP for the proposed project is included in Appendix F. Further, the City requires that all significant redevelopment projects, defined as projects that add or replaces 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surfaces, to comply with Orange County’s LID requirements. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 81 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The proposed project would redevelop the existing project site, which contains approximately 8,125 square feet of pervious surface and approximately 59,579 square feet of impervious surfaces, to develop approximately 67,704 square feet of impervious surfaces. Thus, the proposed project would comply with the County’s LID requirements and implement infiltration BMPs to treat the required stormwater runoff volume. Biotreatment BMPs would also be utilized as a form of pre-treatment prior to entering the proposed infiltration systems. The proposed development would utilize one a BioClean Urban Pond system to retain and infiltrate the entire DCV. The Urban Pond system is an underground infiltration gallery with several rectangular modules with an offset 3-legged design with two narrow legs running parallel and one wider leg running perpendicular. The proposed Urban Pond would have an open bottom and would be underlain by a gravel bed for infiltration. In addition, one Modular Wetland System (MWS) Biofiltration vault would be utilized to provide pre- treatment of street runoff prior to entering the infiltration system. The MWS Biofiltration vault utilizes a 3-phase treatment train by collecting the stormwater runoff in a Pre-Treatment Chamber, Planting or “Wetland” Chamber and Discharge Chamber. The proposed project would also include an on-site catch basin, which would be equipped with a Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) device sized for the 1-year 1-hour storm event for the area tributary to the catch basin. The system would be designed to provide enough static volume to retain 100 percent of the DCV, and the gravel bed surface area would provide sufficient surface area infiltrate this entire volume within 48 hours. Therefore, with implementation of the described BMPs, compliance with the applicable permits and plans, and MM GEO-1, the proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? Less than significant impact. As discussed previously, the proposed project would connect to existing water and sanitary lines on Broadway and would install stormwater drainage systems on- site. According to City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the City relies on a combination of imported water, local groundwater, and a small amount of recycled water to meet its water needs. The City works together with two primary agencies, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) and Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure a reliable water supply that would continue to serve the City in periods of drought and shortage. The City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin (OC Basin). The City has historically relied on approximately 70 percent groundwater (previous 10-year average) and 30 percent imported water from Metropolitan to supply its customers. The City has historically operated 18 active groundwater wells to supply potable water to its customers; however, recently the City has taken 14 wells out of service due to water quality concerns related to contaminants known as polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS ). The City is implementing a new Groundwater Treatment Program that would allow the City to remove PFAS to acceptable State mandated levels.33 33 City of Anaheim. 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=. Accessed February 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 82 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx OCWD regulates groundwater levels in the OC Basin by regulating the annual amount of pumping. The regulation is based on establishing the Basin Production Percentage (BPP), the percentage of each producer’s total water supply that comes from groundwater pumped from the OC Basin. The BPP is set based on groundwater conditions, availability of imported water supplies, and basin management objectives.34 The project site is located on the OC Basin. The proposed project would affect groundwater supplies if the basin recharge would be impacted. Typically, basin recharge occurs through either the natural percolation of rainwater through the ground or the artificial recharge that occurs at spreading grounds, modular wetlands, etc., which results in the percolation of that captured water into the ground. Presently, the existing project site is composed of 12 percent pervious surfaces (approximately 8,125 square feet) and 88 percent impervious surfaces (approximately 59,579 square feet). The proposed project would ultimately result in 100 percent impervious surfaces (approximately 67,704). Thus, the increase in impervious area at the project site would reduce the amount of pervious area available for groundwater recharge through the percolation of rainwater. However, as discussed above, the proposed project would include one BioClean Urban Pond system, one MWS Biofiltration vault, and one on-site catch basin, which would retain and infiltrate stormwater as artificial recharge of groundwater. Further, as discussed in the UWMP, groundwater levels are managed within a safe basin operating range to protect the long-term sustainability of the OC Basin and to protect against land subsidence. OCWD regulates groundwater levels in the OC Basin by regulating the annual amount of pumping. Thus, the proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the proposed project would impede the basins’ sustainable groundwater management. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would : (i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. As discussed in Impact 2.10(a), the proposed project could result in erosion and siltation during construction demolition and grading. However, the proposed project would comply with the General Construction Permit, NPDES requirements, and DAMP requirements, which require the use of BMPs to reduce the project’s impact on water quality. Thus, the proposed project would prepare a SWPPP and implement erosion controls, sediment controls, wind erosion controls, tracking controls, non-stormwater management, and waste and materials management. Further, the proposed project would comply with MM GEO-1 requires the applicant to implement the recommendations related to site preparation and grading contained 34 City of Anaheim. 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=. Accessed February 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 83 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx within the Geotechnical Investigation, which would minimize soil erosion. Thus, impacts to erosion and siltation would be less than significant with the implementation of MM GEO-1. (ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; Less than significant impacts. According to the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Carbon Creek Channel Tributary Area, the project site is located within Drainage Basin 8. Drainage Basin 8 has a tributary drainage area of approximately 1100 acres consisting of two drainage areas. The project site is located within the Drainage Area 8-1, which is defined by the City to drain into an existing storm drain that conveys runoff to Carbon Creek. Stormwater runoff entering Broadway continues to flow west into an existing City of Anaheim public 42-inch reinforced concrete storm drainpipe that turns into a 90-inch reinforced concrete storm drain pipe slightly east of the intersection of West Broadway and S outh Gilbert Street. At Magnolia Avenue, runoff continues into a 96-inch reinforced concrete pipe where it eventually enters the Carbon Creek Channel at South Dale Avenue. The Carbon Creek Channel eventually confluences with the San Gabriel River and ultimately outlets into the Pacific Ocean at San Pedro Bay. The storm drain line that runs in Broadway has a capacity of 455 cubic feet per second (cfs) which is equivalent to 45 percent of the 10-year storm event. As discussed above, the proposed drainage system would collect and convey stormwater runoff to the proposed infiltration system designed to retain and infiltrate the entire DCV within a drawdown time of 48 hours. During larger storm events and when the infiltration system is at capacity, stormwater would overflow within the proposed on-site catch basin and be conveyed off-site via junction structures into the existing public 42-inch storm drain in Broadway. The proposed on-site catch basin would be equipped with a CPS device for certified full capture system requirements and storm drain signage would be implemented. Thus, the proposed project would not contribute to any on or off-site flood, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. (iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or Less than significant impact. As discussed in Impact 2.10(c)(ii) above, the proposed drainage runoff would be collected by a series of area drains and by a proposed sump curb inlet catch basin within the proposed private drive aisle and conveyed to a BioClean Urban Pond infiltration system designed to retain and infiltrate the entire DCV. Pre-treatment of the roof and street surface runoff DCV would be provided by proposed MWS Biofiltration vault prior to entering the infiltration system. During storm events that produce a runoff volume greater than the DCV, stormwater would overflow within the proposed catch basin and be conveyed off-site through a junction structure to the existing public City 42-inch storm drain in West Broadway. The proposed drainage pattern matches the existing historical drainage pattern from the site. Runoff from this area historically flows in the westerly direction and ultimately enters Carbon Creek Channel which flows in the southeasterly direction toward the Pacific Ocean. Thus, the proposed project would not contribute to runoff that exceeds the stormwater drainage system as it would be designed to accommodate the entire DCV. In fact, the results from this Preliminary Hydrology Study, included in Appendix F, demonstrate that the Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 84 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx proposed project would generate a slightly lower volume to Broadway than the existing condition. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. (iv) impede or redirect flood flows? Less than significant impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 06059C0129J, the project site is located within Zone X, which indicates 0.2 percent annual chance of flood hazards; areas of 1 percent annual chance of flood with average depths less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than 1 square mile.35 In other words, this designation identifies a low chance of flood hazard and that the project site is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area. Additionally, the proposed project includes project features that would be designed to accommodate the entire DCV and would generate a slightly lower volume of stormwater to Broadway than the existing condition. Therefore, the proposed project is not in a flood hazard area and would not contribute to flooding on-site. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? Less than significant impact. As described in Impact 2.10(c)(iv) above, the proposed project is not located in a flood hazard area and would have less than significant impacts related to flood hazard. Further, the City’s General Plan Dam Inundation Map indicates that the project site it outside the general limits of the flood impact zone associated with Prado Dam failure, Carbon Canyon Dam failure, and Walnut Canyon Reservoir dam failure. Tsunamis are sea waves that are generated in response to large-magnitude earthquakes. When these waves reach shorelines, they sometimes produce coastal flooding. Seiches are the oscillation of large bodies of standing water, such as lakes, which can occur in response to ground shaking. According to the California Tsunami Hazard Area Map, the project site is located outside a Tsunami Hazard Area.36 Further, the project site is approximately 10.85 miles from the Pacific Ocean, which is the closest large body of standing water, therefore, the chance of seiche is low. Given this information, the opportunity for project inundation is extremely low, and thus, impacts related to release of pollutants during inundation is less than significant. No mitigation is required. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would develop 34 dwelling units, resulting an estimated 116 new residents. According to the UWMP, the City uses a methodology of 51.1 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) for new development. Therefore, the proposed project would generate a water demand of 5,927.6 gallons per day (GPD) or approximately 6.6 acre-feet per year (AFY). 35 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2020. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette, 06059C0129J. Available: https://msc.fema.gov/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisjobs/nfhl_print/mscprintb_gpserver/j444eeb2108664ccbb74593a45c5552a3/scr atch/FIRMETTE_93b9d572-5338-4a9c-b707-9250f6774b71.pdf. Accessed February 16, 2021. 36 California Department of Conservation. 2022. California Tsunami Maps and Data. Available: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps. Accessed February 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 85 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx As discussed above in Impact 2.10(b), the City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the OC Basin, which is managed by OCWD. The City does not have its own Groundwater Management Plan; however, the OCWD maintains a Groundwater Management Plan, which was most recently updated in 2015. According to the OCWD Groundwater Management Plan, OCWD regulates groundwater levels in the OC Basin by regulating the annual amount of pumping. The primary mechanism used by OCWD to manage pumping is the BPP. The BPP is a percentage of each producer’s water supply that comes from groundwater pumped from the basin. The BPP is set on an annual basis and is uniform for all Producers. Groundwater pumping above the BPP is assessed an additional charge that creates a disincentive for over-producing. The proposed project is expected to be operational by 2025. According to the UWMP, by 2025 the BPP for the City would be 82 percent. However, the City’s 2025 water supply and demand forecast in the UWMP projected the local groundwater supply as the amount needed to meet projected demands after subtracting the available supply from Metropolitan (14,000 AFY) and recycled water supply (120 AFY), rather than using the amount of groundwater available to the City based on the BPP. The City would utilize local groundwater supplies first and supplement with imported water as needed to meet demands. Given this information, water supply from groundwater is expected to be approximately 48,182 AFY in 2025, which is approximately 77 percent of the total water supply for the City, which approximately 62,302 AFY. For the same year, the City’s total demand is expected to be 58,878 AFY. The proposed project would create an additional demand of approximately 6.6 AFY, which is approximately 0.01 percent of the total demand. Thus, there is excess groundwater supply available for the City, and the water supply demanded by the proposed project would be negligible. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures Implement MM GEO-1. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 86 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.11 Land Use and Planning Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Environmental Evaluation Setting Information and analysis for Land Use and Planning impacts are based on the City of Anaheim’s General Plan Land Use Element and Anaheim Municipal Code. The proposed project would include the development of 34 attached townhomes on an approximately 1.55-acre project site. The proposed project would include demolition of all the existing buildings and parking areas on-site and the construction of five residential buildings, roadways, sidewalks, and associated improvements. The project site is currently designated for Office–Low land use by the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element and would require a GPA to change the land use to Mid Density Residential. The project site is currently located within the C-G Zone and would be rezoned RM-3.5 as part of the proposed project. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Less than significant impact. The project site is in a highly developed and urbanized area. Surrounding land uses include multi-family residential buildings and religious institutions to the north, south, and east, and a strip mall to the west. Surrounding properties are in the RM-4, C-G, and T zones. The proposed project would meet all development standards of the RM-3.5 zone with approval of a CUP. The project site is located within an urbanized area in the City Anaheim and is not large enough or otherwise configured in such a way that would create a physical barrier within an established community. A typical example of such a barrier would be a project that involved a continuous right- of-way, such as a roadway, which would divide a community and impede access between parts of the community. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not disrupt the surrounding land uses or divide the physical arrangement of the established communities to the north, south, and east of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not physically divide an established community, and impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 87 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would include a GPA to change the General Plan land use designation from Office–Low to Mid Density Residential and reclassify the property from the C-G Zone to the RM-3.5 Zone. As described above, the land uses to the north, south, and east of the project site are designated by the General Plan for multi-family residential land uses. As such, the proposed GPA would be consistent with the existing surrounding land uses, and with approval of these changes, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. Impacts are therefore considered less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 88 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.12 Mineral Resources Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Environmental Evaluation Setting The information and analysis for Mineral Resources impacts is based on the City of Anaheim General Plan EIR, Mineral Resources Section, and the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element. The project site is located in an urbanized area in the City of Anaheim, and no known mineral resources are present on-site. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? No impact. According to the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, mineral resources are located in the northeastern part of the City, especially along the northern side of the Santa Ana River, and are mapped as Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ-2). The General Plan identifies this area as a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area.37 The MRZ-2 designation represents, “areas where adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that a high likelihood for their presence exists.” The project site is located in the western portion of the City and is not located in either of these zones; therefore, project implementation would not affect any known mineral deposits. Additionally, the project site is currently zoned C-G and would be rezoned RM-3.5. The C-G Zone and the RM-3.5 Zone do not permit mineral extraction; therefore, project implementation would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. Thus, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. 37 City of Anaheim. 2020. Anaheim General Plan Green Element Figure G-3, Mineral Resource Map. Website: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/9521. Accessed August 4, 2021. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 89 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No impact. The City of Anaheim General Plan currently designates the project site as G-C, and the proposed project would include a rezoning of the site to RM-3.5. These zones do not permit mineral extraction. Furthermore, the project site is in an urbanized area consisting of residential and office uses and does not support mineral extraction operations; therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 90 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.13 Noise Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Environmental Evaluation Setting The following analysis is based on the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Vista Environmental, March 14, 2022, and included in its entirety in Appendix A. Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The following section calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the temporary construction activities and long-term operations of the proposed project and compares the noise levels to the City standards. Construction-Related Noise The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the three existing office buildings and associated driveways and parking lots on the project site; site preparation and grading of the 1.55-acre project site; construction of the townhomes; paving of the on-site roads and parking areas, sidewalks and hardscapes; and application of architectural coatings. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 91 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residents at the multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet north of the project site. There are also multi-family homes located as near as 110 feet south of the project site, and a church located as near as 20 feet east of the project site. Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code exempts construction noise that occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from the stationary noise standard of 60 decibels (dB) at the nearby residential property lines. All construction activities associated with the proposed project would occur during the allowable hours for construction activities as detailed in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities and even with adherence to the City standards; the resultant construction noise levels may result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby residents. In order to determine whether the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA ) construction noise criteria thresholds detailed in Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis Section 4.1, Federal Regulations, have been utilized, which shows that a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeds 80 A-weighted decibel (dBA) equivalent sound level (Leq) over an 8-hour period during the daytime at the nearby homes or exceeds 85 dBA Leq over an 8-hour period during the daytime at the church to the east, which is considered a commercial use. Construction noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors have been calculated through use of the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and the parameters and assumptions detailed in Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis Section 6.1, Construction Noise, of this report, including Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors. The results are shown below in Table 9. Table 9: Construction Noise Levels at Nearby Homes Construction Phase Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) at: Multi-family Homes to the North1 Multi-family Homes to the South2 Church to the East3 Demolition 73 71 78 Site Preparation 72 70 77 Grading 72 70 77 Building Construction 72 70 77 Paving 0 68 76 Painting 6 59 66 FTA Construction Thresholds4 80 80 85 Exceed Threshold? No No No Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 92 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Construction Phase Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) at: Multi-family Homes to the North1 Multi-family Homes to the South2 Church to the East3 Notes: FTA = Federal Transit Administration 1 The multi-family homes to the north are located as near as 220 feet from the center of the project site. 2 The multi-family homes to the south are located as near as 280 feet from the center of the project site. 3 The church to the east is located as near as 120 feet from the center of the project site. 4 FTA Construction Noise Thresholds obtained from Appendix D, Table A above. Source: Roadway construction Noise Model (RCNM) Federal Highway Administration (FTA) 2006. Table 9 shows that the greatest noise impacts would occur during the demolition phase, with a noise level as high as 73 dBA Leq at the multi-family homes to the north, 71 dBA Leq at the multi-family homes to the south, and 78 dBA Leq at the church to the east. The calculated construction noise levels shown in Table 9 are within the FTA daytime construction noise standard of 80 dBA at the nearby homes and within the 85 dBA noise standard at the church to the east. Therefore, through adherence to the allowable construction times detailed in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code, the proposed project would not create a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels from construction of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational-Related Noise The proposed project would consist of a residential development with 34 townhomes. Potential noise impacts associated with the operations of the proposed project would be from project- generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways. In addition, the proposed development would be adjacent to Broadway, which may create exterior and interior noise levels in excess of City standards at the proposed townhomes. The noise impacts to the nearby existing homes and proposed townhomes have been analyzed separately below. Roadway Vehicular Noise Impact to Nearby Homes Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed project would not require a substantial number of truck trips and would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway. The proposed project’s potential off-site noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that could occur with development of the proposed project. Policy 3 under Goal 2.I of the General Plan Noise Element requires new development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in noise to noise-sensitive land uses to provide appropriate mitigation. However, since the General Plan does not define what increase in roadway noise would be considered significant, the noise increase thresholds detailed in the General Plan EIR has been utilized in this analysis. The General Plan EIR utilized a mobile-source noise threshold of a 5 dBA increase threshold where the Without Project roadway noise levels are below 65 dBA CNEL at the nearest homes; or a 3 dBA increase threshold where the Without Project roadway noise levels are 65 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or higher. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 93 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The potential off-site traffic noise impacts created by the ongoing operations of the proposed project have been analyzed through utilization of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA ) model and parameters described in Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis, Section 6.2, Operations-Related Noise, and the FHWA model traffic noise calculation spreadsheets are also provided in Appendix A. The proposed project’s potential off-site traffic noise impacts have been analyzed for the existing year and opening year and General Plan Buildout scenarios that are discussed separately below. Existing Year Conditions The proposed project’s potential off-site traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the Existing scenario to the Existing Plus Project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 10. Table 10: Existing Year Traffic Noise Contributions Roadway Segment dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Existing Existing Plus Project Project Contribution Euclid Street South of West Broadway 66.1 66.1 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway West of Euclid Street 67.4 67.4 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway East of Euclid Street 65.0 65.0 0.0 +3 dBA Building Construction East of Project Driveway 65.0 65.0 0.0 +3 dBA Notes: CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A-weighted decibel 1 Distance to nearest residential use shown in Table D, does not take into account existing noise barriers. 2 Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan Goal 2.1, Policy 3 detailed above in Section 4.3. Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Table 10 shows that the proposed project’s permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the allowable noise increase thresholds detailed above. The proposed project would only increase the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes by a maximum of 0.71 percent; therefore, the project-related roadway noise increase is negligible, as shown in Table 10. A minimal increase in traffic on a busy roadway often results in no measurable increase in traffic noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the existing conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. Opening Year Conditions The proposed project’s potential off-site traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the Opening Year scenario to the Opening Year With Project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 11. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 94 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 11: Opening Year Project Traffic Noise Contributions Roadway Segment dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Existing Existing Plus Project Project Contribution Euclid Street South of West Broadway 66.2 66.2 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway West of Euclid Street 67.5 67.5 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway East of Euclid Street 65.1 65.1 0.0 +3 dBA Building Construction East of Project Driveway 65.1 65.1 0.0 +3 dBA Notes: CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A-weighted decibel 1 Distance to nearest residential use shown in Table D, does not take into account existing noise barriers. 2 Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan Goal 2.1, Policy 3 detailed above in Section 4.3. Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Table 11 shows that the proposed project’s permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the FTA’s allowable increase thresholds detailed above. The proposed project would only increase ADT volumes by a maximum of 0.71 percent; therefore, the project-related roadway noise increase is negligible, as shown in Table 11. A minimal increase in traffic on a busy roadway often results in no measurable increase in traffic noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the opening year conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. General Plan Buildout Conditions The proposed project’s potential off-site traffic noise impacts have been calculated through a comparison of the General Plan Buildout scenario to the General Plan Buildout With Project scenario. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 12. Table 12: General Plan Buildout Project Traffic Noise Contributions Roadway Segment dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Existing Existing Plus Project Project Contribution Euclid Street South of West Broadway 67.5 67.5 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway West of Euclid Street 67.7 67.7 0.0 +3 dBA West Broadway East of Euclid Street 65.4 65.4 0.0 +3 dBA Building Construction East of Project Driveway 65.4 65.4 0.0 +3 dBA City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 95 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Roadway Segment dBA CNEL at Nearest Receptor1 Increase Threshold2 Existing Existing Plus Project Project Contribution Notes: CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A-weighted decibel1 Distance to nearest residential use shown in Table D, does not take into account existing noise barriers. 2 Increase Threshold obtained from General Plan Goal 2.1, Policy 3 detailed above in Section 4.3. Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model FHWA-RD-77-108. Table 12 shows that the proposed project’s permanent roadway noise increases to the nearby homes from the generation of additional vehicular traffic would not exceed the FTA’s allowable increase thresholds detailed above. The proposed project would only increase the ADT volumes by a maximum of 0.71 percent; therefore, the project-related roadway noise increase is negligible, as shown in Table 12. A minimal increase in traffic on a busy roadway often results in no measurable increase in traffic noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels for the General Plan Buildout conditions. Impacts would be less than significant. Roadway Noise Impacts to the Proposed Townhomes The proposed project would consist of a residential development with 34 townhomes. Goal 1.1 Part 5 of the General Plan discourages the siting of new homes in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL without appropriate mitigation. Section 18.40.090.050 of the Municipal Code requires that exterior noise within common recreation areas of multiple-family dwelling projects be attenuated to a maximum of 65 dBA CNEL and requires the interior of new multiple-family units to be attenuated to 45 dBA CNEL. It is anticipated that the primary source of noise impacts to the project site would be traffic noise from Broadway that is adjacent to the south side of the project site. The FHWA traffic noise prediction model parameters used in this analysis are discussed in detail in Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis, Section 6.2, Operations-Related Noise, and the FHWA model printouts are also provided in Appendix A. The exterior and interior noise impacts to the proposed townhomes have been analyzed separately below. Exterior Noise Impacts Table 13 shows the calculated roadway noise levels at the private patio areas of the proposed townhomes. It should be noted that this provides for a more conservative analysis than what is required from Section 18.40.090.050 , which only requires the common recreation areas to meet the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard. The proposed project includes Project Design Feature (PDF) NOI-1, which provided a required 3-foot-high fence that is located on the south side of Building 1 patios as depicted on the Wall Plan (see Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis) to be constructed of solid material that has a minimum 15 Sound Transmission Class (STC ) rating or higher, which would reduce noise impacts. The roadway noise levels were calculated at the private patio areas of the proposed townhomes with implementation of PDF NOI-1, and the results are shown in Table 13. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 96 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 13: Proposed Townhomes Private Patio Areas Roadway Noise Levels Building 1 Unit Roadway Exterior Noise Levels at Private Patio Areas (dBA CNEL) Exceed City’s 65 dBA CNEL Exterior Noise Standard? 1 West Broadway 63.4 No 4 West Broadway 64.8 No 6 West Broadway 64.8 No Notes: CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A-weighted decibel 1 Calculated noise levels account for solid patio wall as depicted in PDF NOI-1. Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) RD-77-108 Model. Table 13 shows that with application of PDF NOI-1, the roadway noise levels at the private patio areas would be reduced to within the City’s 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard. Exterior noise impacts to the proposed townhomes would be less than significant. Interior Noise Impacts For the interior noise levels of the proposed townhomes, Table N-3 of the General Plan details that the interior noise level for homes with closed windows and mechanical ventilation would provide a minimum of 20 dBA exterior to interior noise level reduction. PDF NOI-1 has been included in this analysis to ensure that each townhome has a forced air mechanical ventilation system so that windows may be kept in the closed position. The anticipated noise levels have been calculated at the first, second, and third floor façades and interior of the nearest proposed townhomes to Broadway, and the results are shown below in Table 14. Table 14: Proposed Townhomes Interior Noise Levels from Roadway Noise Building 1 Unit Number Floor Road Noise Level at façade of Townhomes (dBA CNEL) Townhomes Interior Noise Level1 (dBA CNEL) Exceed City’s 45 dBA CNEL Interior Noise Standards? 1 First 61.6 41.6 No Second 64.5 44.5 No Third 64.2 44.2 No 2 First 63.3 43.3 No Second 64.5 44.5 No Third 64.2 44.2 No 3 First 63.6 53.6 No Second 64.5 44.5 No Third 64.2 44.2 No Notes: City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 97 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Building 1 Unit Number Floor Road Noise Level at façade of Townhomes (dBA CNEL) Townhomes Interior Noise Level1 (dBA CNEL) Exceed City’s 45 dBA CNEL Interior Noise Standards? CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA = A-weighted decibel 1 Interior noise level based on a 20 dB exterior to interior noise reduction rate (City of Anaheim, 2004) Source: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) RD-77-108 Model. Table 14 shows that the interior noise levels at the proposed townhomes that are adjacent to Broadway would be within the Section 18.40.090.050 of the Municipal Code interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Therefore, the roadway noise impacts at the interior of the proposed townhomes would be less than significant. b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than significant. The proposed project would not generate or expose persons to excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The following section analyzes the potential vibration impacts associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project. Construction-Related Vibration Impacts The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the three existing office buildings and associated driveways and parking lots on the project site; site preparation and grading of the 1.55-acre project site; construction of the townhomes; paving of the on-site roads and parking areas, sidewalks and hardscapes; and application of architectural coatings. Vibration impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would typically be created from the operation of heavy off-road equipment. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are residents at the multi-family homes located as near as 50 feet north of the project site. There are also multi-family homes located as near as 110 feet south of the project site and a church located as near as 20 feet east of the project site. Since neither the General Plan nor the Municipal Code provide a quantifiable vibration threshold for construction equipment, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) guidance that is detailed in Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis, Section 4.2, State Regulations, has been utilized, which defines the threshold of perception from transient sources at 0.25 inch per second peak particle velocity (PPV). The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. From Appendix A, Noise Impact Analysis, a large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.089 inch per second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest off-site structure that may contain sensitive receptors (a church 20 feet to the east) would be 0.11 inch per second PPV. The vibration level at the nearest off-site structure with sensitive receptors would be below the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above. Therefore, a less than significant vibration impact is anticipated from construction of the proposed project. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 98 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Operations-Related Vibration Impacts The proposed project would consist of the development of a residential community. The ongoing operation of the proposed project would not include the operation of any known vibration sources other than typical on-site vehicle operations for a residential development. Therefore, a less than significant vibration impact is anticipated from operation of the proposed project. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less than significant. The proposed project may expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft. The nearest airport is Fullerton Municipal Airport, which is located as near as 3.5 miles northwest of the project site. The project site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of this airport. Therefore, the proposed project would not be exposed to excessive aircraft noise. Impacts would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures None required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 99 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.14 Population and Housing Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Environmental Evaluation Setting According to the U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts page, the City has an estimated population of 346,824 people as of April 2020. The approximate persons per household as of 2020 is estimated to be 3.39 persons. Given that the proposed project would develop 34 dwelling units, the proposed project is estimated to generate approximately 116 new residents.38 Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less than significant impact. As described above, the proposed project would generate 116 new residents, which is approximately 0.03 percent, a negligible increase, of the City’s total population in 2020. Additionally, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Demographics and Growth Technical Report, included as part of the 2020-2045 Connect SoCal Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) forecasts that the City’s population would increase to 416,800 persons and 122,700 households by 2045.39 Therefore, this population growth of 116 persons is not considered unplanned. Additionally, the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the 6th Cycle planning period identifies the future housing need of 17,411 units. The proposed project would contribute 34 dwelling units to the future housing need for the 6th Cycle planning period. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the City, either through new housing or proposing new businesses or indirectly 38 U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. City of Anaheim Quickfacts. Available: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/anaheimcitycalifornia. Accessed February 16, 2022. 39 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020. Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report. Available: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_demographics-and-growth - forecast.pdf?1606001579. Accessed February 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 100 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx through extension of roads or other infrastructure. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No impact. The existing project site consists of three single-story multi-tenant office buildings and a shared asphalt parking lot and does not contain any residential dwelling units. Therefore, the proposed project would not displace any people or housing. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 101 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.15 Public Services Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? Environmental Evaluation Setting The information in this section is based, in part, on correspondence with City of Anaheim public service providers, included as Appendix G of this report. Correspondence consisted of responses to an inquiry sent via email to public service providers on Friday, August 6, 2021. Responses were provided to FCS between August 17 and August 19, 2021. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? Less than significant impact. Anaheim Fire & Rescue provides fire protection services to the project site. Anaheim Fire & Rescue is a full service organization designed to provide essential public safety and emergency services to the community and its visitors. Currently 11 engines, six trucks, two battalion chiefs, and two medic units (assigned to the Disneyland Resort 14 hours per shift) are staffed daily by 71 members from 11 fire stations. Anaheim Fire & Rescue operates a 3-shift system and has established a minimum staffing of 71 suppression personnel per shift, per day. This includes two battalion chiefs and the personnel assigned, under contract, to the Disneyland Resort. Anaheim Fire & Rescue maintains a minimum of four firefighters on 13 front-line companies and three firefighters on three front-line companies. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 102 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Anaheim Fire & Rescue has adopted and follows the expectations of the National Incident Management System (NIMS), a program used in the United States to coordinate emergency preparedness and incident management among various federal, State, and local agencies.40 Table 15: City of Anaheim Fire Service Facilities Station Address Equipment Downtown Station 1 500 East Broadway Street Paramedic Engine 1, Truck 1, Type 3-301, Ambulance 1, and Rehab-1 Brookhurst Station 2 2141 West Crescent Avenue Paramedic Engine 2 and Truck 2 US&R two Ambulance 2 Resort Station 3 1717 South Clementine Street Paramedic Engine 3, Truck 3, Type 3-309, Paramedic 3 (Disney), Ambulance 3, and Light Air 3 Orange Station 4 2736 West Orange Avenue Paramedic Engine 4 La Palma Station 5 2540 La Palma Paramedic Engine 5 Type 3-305, MMRS 1 and Ambulance 5 Euclid Station 6 1330 South Euclid Street Paramedic Engine 6, Truck 6, Battalion 2, Ambulance 6, and Hazmat 6 Paramedic 6 (Disney) Stadium Station 7 2222 East Ball Road Paramedic Engine 7 Riverdale Station 8 4555 East Riverdale Avenue Battalion 1, Paramedic Engine 8, Truck 8, Type 6-601, and Type 3- 308 Anaheim Hills Station 9 6300 East Nohl Ranch Road Paramedic Engine 9, Type 6-602 Water Tender 1 and Ambulance 9 Weir Canyon Station 10 8270 East Monte Vista Road Paramedic Truck 10, Type 3-310 Twila Reid Station 11 3078 West Orange Avenue Paramedic Engine 11 OES Engine 414, Ambulance 11, and OES Type 3-1211 Source: Anaheim Fire & Rescue 2021. Fire stations are strategically located in the City of Anaheim to ensure an efficient demand response to all risk hazards and to maintain recommendations for response times. National response time standards require the first engine to respond within 5 minutes to 90 percent of all incidents and within 8 minutes to the remaining 10 percent. Anaheim Fire & Rescue also requires a truck company to respond within a maximum of 10 minutes to 100 percent of all incidents. The site is currently served by Anaheim Fire & Rescue via the existing infrastructure. Current response times average 3 minutes and 37 seconds for all calls. Additionally, both automatic and mutual aid agreements exist with surrounding jurisdictions. 40 Young, Lindsey. Interim Fire Marshal, Anaheim Fire and Rescue. Personal communication: e mail. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 103 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The first responding station to the proposed project would be Station 6, located 1.1 miles south of the project site. According to Anaheim Fire & Rescue, there is no anticipated reduction in service level due to the proposed project, and the proposed project is compliant with all currently adopted codes and standards at the time of plan submittal. Development fees would include Fire Department plan check at $137 per hour, and inspection at $68 per hour. Additional fees for fire protection systems vary by system type and size and can be found on the City of Anaheim’s website.41 Because the proposed project would not reduce service levels and would comply with the required development fees, impacts associated with fire protection services would be less than significant. b) Police protection? Less than significant impact. The Anaheim Police Department provides law enforcement and crime prevention services to the project site. Officers operate out of four stations and patrol an area of 49.7 square miles, divided into four districts—West, Central, South, and East. The police stations are located as follows: • Main Station, located at 425 South Harbor Boulevard • East Station, located at 8201 East Santa Ana Canyon Road • West Station, located at 320 South Beach Boulevard • South Station, located at 198 South West Place Police services provided include patrol, investigations, traffic enforcement, traffic control, vice and narcotics enforcement, airborne patrol, crime suppression, community policing, tourist-oriented policing, and detention facilities. The Anaheim Police Department currently employs approximately 386 sworn officers, a support staff of over 170. The ratio of sworn police officers is approximately 2.59 officers per 1,000 population. Based on consultation with the Anaheim Police Department, the proposed project would not generate demand for additional staffing. However, in the future if additional police staff are needed, funding for any new personnel needed to maintain acceptable service levels would come from the City of Anaheim’s General Fund. Property taxes and other fees assessed for the property would contribute to the General Fund revenues. The existing uses on the site are currently served by An aheim Police Department. The nearest police station to the project site is the Main Station, located 1.4 miles east of the project site. Existing Police Department facilities would be sufficient to serve the additional demand associated with the proposed project along with the existing demand of the area. For these reasons, the proposed project would not result in a need for new or expanded police protection facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Schools? Less than significant impact. The proposed project is within the Anaheim Elementary School District boundary. Elementary school aged children would be serviced by Loara Elementary School, located 41 Young, Lindsey. Interim Fire Marshal, Anaheim Fire & Rescue. Personal communication: email. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 104 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx at 1601 West Broadway. Loara Elementary School is located approximately 0.2 mile from the project site. The current district-wide enrollment is 15,252 students; current capacity is 17,725. Loara Elementary School is home to approximately 516 students in grades kindergarten through sixth grade and has a housing capacity of 575 seats. Current student generation factors used by the Anaheim Elementary School District are 0.23 per unit for single-family attached homes, and 0.15 per unit for multi-family units. Based on the higher generation rate of 0.23 students per unit for a more conservative estimate, the proposed project would generate eight students in grades K-6. The school district does have the ability to accommodate the demand of the proposed project as part of the existing facilities, as the Loara Elementary School is below enrollment capacity. The increase of students as a result of the proposed project would not cause the school to exceed the enrollment capacity; therefore, the proposed project would not significantly impact school services. The proposed project would pay the required school district development fees of $2.04 per square- foot for single-family and multi-family attached housing. Payment of the fees would satisfy the requirements of AB 2926 and SB 50 to offset impacts to school services. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. According to correspondence with the Anaheim Elementary School District, closure of traffic lanes and sidewalks could have an impact on school vehicle, bus, and pedestrian traffic during construction of the proposed project.42 However, any closures related to project construction would be temporary and would comply with applicable City guidelines, regarding partial closures and detours. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. d) Parks? Less than significant impact. See Section 2.16 for further discussion. The City of Anaheim’s Citywide standard of parkland is 2 acres per 1,000 residents. The current provision of parkland acreage is 1.05 acres per 1,000 residents. According to the Anaheim General Plan, Green Element Figure G-1, the project site is not located within a Park Deficiency Area.43 The park that would serve the proposed project is Chaparral Park, located at 1770 West Broadway, which is 0.3 mile west of the project site. Chaparral Park was developed around 1971, and the majority of the recreational amenities are in need of upgrades. Amenities including the restrooms, an abandoned wading pool, and a play area. The amenities and park facilities, including irrigation and electrical facilities, need improvements. Additionally, future residents of the proposed project would use the Downtown Community Center located at 250 East Center Street, which is located 1.9 miles east of the project site. The Downtown Community Center was dedicated in 1998 and has a 4,200-square-foot assembly hall, a senior center, and an art gallery.44 The buildings at the Downtown Community Center have served and 42 Chavarria, Jesse. Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Services, Anaheim Elementary School District. Personal communication: email. August 18, 2021. 43 City of Anaheim. 2020. General Plan Green Element. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/9521#:~:text=he%20Green%20Element%20combines%20Anaheim’s,philosophy %20is%20broad%20and%20inclusive. Accessed March 11, 2022. 44 Anaheim Community Services. 2021. Downtown Anaheim Community Center. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/1018/Downtown-Community-Center. Accessed November 2, 2021. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 105 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx continue to serve many residents since it opened and are also currently in need of upgrades.45 Additionally, the proposed project would offer amenities such as interior community gathering areas, which would provide an alternative to public community gathering areas for residents of the proposed project. Furthermore, the proposed project is located approximately 500 feet from Loara Elementary School, which provides additional recreational opportunities and community space through formal and informal joint use agreements with the City.46 The proposed project would bring new residents, which would create additional demand on park and recreational facilities. The City of Anaheim has adopted a park in lieu fees resolution. The proposed project would comply with the impact fees of $183,196.76 for 34 residential units.47 Pursuant to the Quimby Act and Anaheim Municipal Code Section 17.34.010, which requires park in lieu fee for projects with 50 or fewer units, the proposed project would be subject to its fair share of in lieu fees based on the number and type of dwelling units. According to the City of Anaheim Development Impact Fee Justification Study, impact fees are used for the acquisition, installation, and construction of public facilities identified on a needs lists and appropriate administrative costs to mitigate the direct and cumulative impacts of new development in the City. Fees are based on an equivalent development unit method to fairly allocate costs to new development and determine the appropriate fee levels that would provide a source of funds to pay for the proposed facilities.48 With payment of the required fees, impacts would be less than significant. e) Other public facilities? Less than significant impact. The Anaheim Public Library system includes a central library and six branch libraries, along with the Anaheim Heritage Center, Books on the Go! (self-service kiosk at Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center), and a mobile library. The Anaheim Public Library system has 308,223 library card holders, with 1.3 million annual visits in Fiscal Year 2018/2019. Central Library, which is located at 500 West Broadway, would serve the proposed proj ect. Central Library is located 1.3 miles east of the project site. Additionally, Euclid Library is 1.1 miles south of the project site. Population growth affects online library resources because the basis for licensing fees for databases, e-Books, and other digital resources are generally the population of the library’s service area. With additional residents to serve, the proposed project would reduce the overall availability per capita of books, media, computers, and library public service space. Therefore, in order to maintain current per capita levels and licensing agreements, the City would need to provide additional physical and virtual resources to the Anaheim library system. The proposed project’s impacts to the overall availability per capita of books, media, computers, and library public service space would not result in significant physical or environmental impacts. 45 Jimenez, JJ. Principal Project Planner, Community Services Department, City of Anaheim. Personal communication: email. August 24, 2021. 46 City of Anaheim. 2020. General Plan Green Element. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/9521#:~:text=he%20Green%20Element%20combines%20Anaheim’s,philosophy %20is%20broad%20and%20inclusive. Accessed March 11, 2022. 47 Ibid. 48 David Tausig & Associates, Inc. 2017. Development Impact Fee Justification Study. September. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/21273/Development-Impact-Fee-Study. Accessed March 11, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 106 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Therefore, project-related impacts to library facilities would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required. Mitigation Measures None required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 107 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.16 Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Environmental Evaluation Setting The City of Anaheim owns and operates nearly 50 developed parks totaling almost 700 acres. Park facilities include neighborhood, community, and special use parks. Furthermore, the City has over 50 miles of developed and proposed riding and hiking trails. The City currently maintains park dedication standards that require new development in the City to ensure that 2 acres of parkland would be developed for each 1,000 residents. Depending on the magnitude of residential development, the dedication may be in the form of direct dedication of improved land, the payment of fees in lieu of dedication, or a combination of both. The City has a park dedication ordinance, and every year the City Council adopts a resolution setting park dedication fee. The current provision of parkland acreage is 1.05 acres per 1,000 residents. The park that would serve the proposed project is Chaparral Park, located at 1770 West Broadway. Chaparral Park was developed around 1971, and the majority of the recreational amenities in need of upgrades. Amenities including the restrooms, an abandoned wading pool, and a play area. The amenities and park facilities, including irrigation and electrical facilities, need improvements. Additionally, future residents of the proposed project would use the Downtown Community Center located at 250 East Center Street. The Downtown Community Center was dedicated in 1998 and has a 4,200-square-foot assembly hall, a senior center, and an art gallery.49 The buildings at the Downtown Community Center have served and continue to serve many residents since it opened and are also currently in need of upgrades.50 49 Anaheim Community Services. 2021. Downtown Anaheim Community Center. Website: https://www.anaheim.net/1018/Downtown-Community-Center. Accessed November 2, 2021. 50 Jimenez, JJ. Principal Project Planner, Community Services Department, City of Anaheim. Personal communication: email. August 24, 2021. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 108 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Less than significant impact. As previously discussed, the development of the proposed project would result in 116 new residents to the City, which would increase the demand on existing neighborhood and regional parks. Given the City’s park dedication standards, the proposed project would be required to develop approximately 0.23 acre of parkland, approximately 10,019-square- feet or pay in lieu fees. The proposed project would provide 9,525 square feet of open space. Open space on the project site would include 7,544 square feet of common areas and 1,981 square feet of private open space. The private open space would include 1,281 square feet of ground-level patios and 700 square feet of second-floor deck areas. However, the proposed project would not develop additional parks. Therefore, as discussed previously in Impact 2.15(d), the proposed project would be required to pay the City’s adopted park in lieu fees, which would be approximately $183,196.76 for 34 residential units.51 With payment of the required fees, and inclusion of the proposed project’s 9,525 square feet of open space, impacts would be less than significant. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No impact. As discussed above, although the project includes open space, the project does not propose the construction or expansion of public recreational facilities. The proposed project would result 116 new residents, which would place additional demand on the existing parks. The proposed project would comply with the City’s park dedication standard and pay in lieu fees to the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in adverse physical impacts associated with such facilities. Thus, no impact would occur and no mitigation is required Mitigation Measures None required. 51 Jimenez, JJ. Principal Project Planner, Community Services Department, City of Anaheim. Personal communication: email. August 24, 2021. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 109 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.17 Transportation Would the project: a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Environmental Evaluation Setting The analysis contained in this section is partially based on the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by TJW Engineering, Inc. in October 2021, included in Appendix H. Changes to the CEQA Guidelines were adopted in December 2018 to implement SB 743. CEQA Guideline 15064.3, which describes criteria for evaluating a project's transportation impacts, provides that VMT is generally "the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts," and that except for roadway capacity projects, a project's effect on traffic delays "shall not constitute a significant environmental impact." These provisions went into effect July 1, 2020. Therefore, the VMT analysis evaluated the applicable City of Anaheim screening thresholds to determine whether the proposed project would be expected to create impacts related to VMT. Trip generation represents the amount of traffic, both inbound and outbound, produced by the proposed project. Determining trip generation for a proposed project is based on projecting the amount of traffic that the specific land uses being proposed would produce. Industry standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual trip generation rates were used to determine trip generation of for most of the proposed project land uses. Table 16 summarizes the projected AM peak-hour, PM peak-hour and daily trip generation of the proposed project. The proposed project is projected to generate 229 daily trips, 14 AM peak-hour trips, and 17 PM peak- hour trips. The existing uses on the project site generate 338 daily trips. Therefore, the proposed project would result in 159 fewer total daily trips than the existing uses. The proposed project would result in 18 fewer AM peak-hour trips and 24 fewer PM peak-hour trips than existing uses. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 110 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Table 16: Proposed Project Trip Generation Proposed Land Use Qty Daily Trips (ADTs) AM Peak-hour PM Peak-hour Rate Volume Rate In:Out Split Volume Rate In:Out Split Volume In Out Total In Out Total Existing Medical Offices (720) 6.22 KSF 36.00 224 3.10 79:21 15 4 19 3.93 30:70 7 17 24 General Offices (712) 7.93 KSF 14.39 114 1.67 82:18 11 2 13 2.16 34:66 6 11 17 Subtotal 338 26 6 32 13 28 41 Proposed Multi-family Housing (Mid-Rise) (221) 34 DU 5.44 185 0.36 26:74 3 9 12 0.44 61:39 9 6 15 Net Total -109 -23 5 -18 -2 -22 -24 Notes: ADT = Average Daily Traffic DU = dwelling unit KSF = thousand square feet Source: TJW Engineering, Inc., 2021. Regional access to the project site is from I-5 via Broadway, Lincoln Avenue, and Euclid Street exits. Site access is planned via one full access driveway along Broadway. The proposed project is anticipated to be built and generating trips in 2022. Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than significant impact. The TIA determined that implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with applicable programs or plans related to circulation. The findings indicate that the proposed project does not warrant improvements to the study intersection because impacts would be less than significant. The roadway analysis results indicate that impacts to roadway segments would also be less than significant (see Appendix A, Noise Report, and Appendix H, Traffic Impact Analysis). Therefore, the proposed project is anticipated to be consistent with the General Plan. Thus, the proposed project would comply with the applicable programs and plan applicable to transportation. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 111 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx The proposed project would include a pedestrian-friendly design including sidewalks and streetlights for pedestrians. The sidewalks would connect to the existing sidewalks along Broadway. Furthermore, a Class II bicycle lane is proposed along Broadway and an existing Class II bicycle lane is located along South Euclid Street, approximately 382 feet west of the project site. The nearest bus stop is located approximately 382 feet west of the project site near the intersection of South Euclid Street and Broadway. This bus stop provides service to OCTA Ro ute 37. Approximately 0.25-mile north of the project site is another bus stop which provides service to OCTA Route 42. The proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts to public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? Less than significant impact. Based on the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020), some project types are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact, as their uses can be considered local serving in nature. Among the list of various uses, projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips can be presumed to have a less than significant impact. The proposed project is projected to generate 229 total daily trips. The existing uses on the project site generate 338 daily trips. Therefore, the proposed project would result in 159 fewer total daily trips than the existing uses. As such, the proposed project will generate less than 110 daily vehicle trips. Furthermore, the proposed project would result in 18 fewer AM peak-hour trips and 24 fewer PM peak-hour trips. Therefore, the proposed project can be presumed to have a less than significant impact under Type 3: Project Type Screening per the City’s Guidelines for VMT analysis. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would replace existing driveway access to the project site on Broadway with a new driveway off Broadway to the project site. The driveway would provide full access onto Broadway. The proposed project would also include internal roadways to provide circulation within the development. The project driveway and internal roadways would be developed to comply with the City Building Division and Fire & Rescue Department standards. The proposed project would develop 34 townhomes and would not include the use of any incompatible vehicles or equipment, such as farm equipment. The proposed project is surrounded by a residential uses to the north, south, and east; churches to the east and west; and commercial uses to the west. Therefore, the proposed project’s residential development would be compatible with the surrounding uses. Thus, the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to design or incompatible uses. Thus, impacts are less than significant, and no mitigation is required. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? Less than significant impact. As previously discussed, the proposed project would provide site access via a driveway on Broadway, which is required to be compliant with City Building Division and Fire & Rescue Department standards. This compliance includes that the project driveways and Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 112 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx internal circulation would accommodate standard fire lane turning radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers. To ensure compliance, the Anaheim Fire & Rescue would review project plans for final approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Further, it is not anticipated that construction of the proposed project would require the closure of any public roadways. Temporary construction activities would not impede the use of the road for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. Thus, impacts are less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 113 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.18 Utilities and Service Systems Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Environmental Evaluation Setting According to the City’s UWMP, the City relies on a combination of imported water, local groundwater, and a small amount of recycled water to meet its water needs. The City works together with two primary agencies, Metropolitan and the OCWD, to ensure a reliable water supply that would continue to serve the City in periods of drought and shortage. The City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the OC Basin. The City has historically relied on approximately 70 percent groundwater (previous 10-year average) and 30 percent imported water from Metropolitan to supply its customers. The same water supply mix is anticipated to be available to the City through 2040. The City’s Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Division is responsible for maintenance of the City’s sewer and storm drain lines. The proposed project is within the West Anaheim Water Plan of Sanitary Sewers (WAWPSS), adopted in June 2019. The WAWPSS study area consists of approximately 7,450 acres in gross area and approximately 870,000 linear feet of sewer pipelines Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 114 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx that serve a population of approximately 140,500 people. The area is essentially fully developed and designated as a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial land uses. A majority of the wastewater from the WAWPSS study area drains into one of the Orange County Sanitation District (OC San) trunk sewers for further treatment and final discharge. OC Sans trunk sewers within the WAWPSS study area are located on Knott Avenue, Western Avenue, Orange Avenue, Magnolia Avenue and Euclid Avenue. The remainder of the wastewater flows into neighboring cities including Buena Park, Stanton, and Garden Grove. The Anaheim Public Utilities (APU) Department’s Electrical Division currently provides electricity to residents and business industry. The distribution system consists of approximately 1,200 circuit miles of transmission and distribution lines, over 700 miles of which are underground. In order to facilitate the safe and efficient transfer of electricity to residences and businesses, 13 distribution substations are located throughout the City. Anaheim obtains its electric supply from its resources located in or near Anaheim and across the western United States. To round out its electric supply, the City of Anaheim participates in seasonal power exchanges as well as additional market purchases where necessary.52 Telecommunication services are provided to the City through various companies including AT&T, Spectrum, Cox Communications, and Frontier. Although the project site is currently developed, to provide a more conservative analysis no deductions have been made to account for existing development demands on utilities in this section. Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less than significant impact. The proposed project would develop 34 attached townhomes on an approximately 1.55-acre project site. The proposed project would connect to existing water and sanitary lines on Broadway and would install stormwater drainage systems on-site. A transformer would be to be located in proximity to the main driveway entry along Broadway. The proposed project’s water needs would be met by the City. The proposed project would connect to existing water lines in Broadway and would not require additional water infrastructure to be built of expanded. Further, as described previously in Impact 2.10(d), the proposed project is estimated to result in 116 new residents. Using the UWMP methodology,53 the proposed project would generate a water demand of 5,927.6 GPD or approximately 6.6 AFY. This demand constitutes approximately 0.01 percent of the total demand. Therefore, the proposed project does not require and would not result in the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required 52 City of Anaheim. 2004. Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR. Available: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2195/513-Public-Services-and-Facilities?bidId=. Accessed February 17, 2022. 53 City of Anaheim. 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=. Accessed February 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 115 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx As discussed above, the City’s Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Division is responsible for maintenance of the City’s sewer and storm drain lines. The project site is currently developed and the proposed project is within the WAWPSS. The proposed project would connect to the existing sewer lines in Broadway. The proposed project would ultimately result in a land use designation of Mid Density Residential. According to the WAWPSS land use categories and flow factors, the adjusted flow rates for townhouses for buildout condition would be approximately 215 gallons per day per dwelling unit (GPD/du).54 Therefore, the proposed project would generate approximately 7,310 GPD. Using the office use generation factor of 1,650 GPD/acre , the existing site generates approximately 2,558 GPD. Therefore, the proposed project would represent an increase in flow of approximately 4,752 GPD. However, according to the WAWPSS , the City’s expects an increase in residential demands on the sewer system and that the household growth would remain stable. Further, the deficient pipelines identified by WAWPSS are not located within the project’s vicinity. Thus, the proposed project would not require, or result in, the construction of new sewer facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. As previously discussed, the proposed project would include on-site stormwater capture infrastructure. The proposed project would implement infiltration BMPs to treat the required stormwater runoff volume. Biotreatment BMPs would also be utilized as a form of pre-treatment prior to entering the proposed infiltration systems. The proposed development would utilize one a BioClean Urban Pond system to retain and infiltrate the entire DCV. The Urban Pond system is an underground infiltration gallery with several rectangular modules with an offset 3-legged design with two narrow legs running parallel and one wider leg running perpendicular. The proposed Urban Pond would have an open bottom and would be underlain by a gravel bed for infiltration. In addition, one MWS Biofiltration vault would be utilized to provide pre-treatment of street runoff prior to entering the infiltration system. The MWS Biofiltration vault utilizes a 3-phase treatment train by collecting the stormwater runoff in a Pre- Treatment Chamber, Planting or “Wetland” Chamber and Discharge Chamber. The proposed project would also include an on-site catch basin, which would be equipped with a CPS device sized for the 1- year 1-hour storm event for the area tributary to the catch basin. The system would be designed to provide enough static volume to retain 100 percent of the DCV, and the gravel bed surface area would provide sufficient surface area infiltrate this entire volume within 48 hours. Thus, the proposed project would not require new or expanded stormwater treatment facilities. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The APU Department’s Electrical Division currently provides electricity to residents and business industry. The project entire site would be powered by electric and solar, therefore, there would be no gas usage on-site. The proposed project would be located in an urbanized area and connect to existing electric and telecommunication infrastructure; no off-site infrastructure improvements would be required. The proposed project would not substantially increase service demand for utility providers through substantial unplanned population growth and existing capacity would be sufficient to support project residents. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required 54 City of Anaheim. 2019. West Anaheim Mater Plan of Sanitary Sewers. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/27618/West-Anaheim-MPSS-2019. Accessed February 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 116 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Less than significant impact. As discussed previously, the City relies on a combination of imported water, local groundwater, and a small amount of recycled water to meet its water needs. The City works together with two primary agencies, Metropolitan and OCWD to ensure a safe and reliable water supply that would continue to serve the community in periods of drought and shortage. The City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the OC Basin. The City has historically relied on approximately 70 percent groundwater (previous 10-year average) and 30 percent imported water from Metropolitan to supply its customers. Metropolitan’s principal sources of water are the Colorado River via the Colorado River Aqueduct and the Lake Oroville watershed in Northern California through the State Water Project. Storage is also a major component of Metropolitan’s dry year resource management strategy. Metropolitan’s likelihood of having adequate supply capability to meet projected demands is highly dependent on its storage resources. The proposed project would develop 34 dwelling units, resulting an estimated 116 new residents. According to the UWMP, the City uses a methodology of 51.1 GPCD for new development. Therefore, the proposed project would generate a water demand of 5,927.6 GPD or approximately 6.6 AFY. The proposed project is expected to be operational by 2025. According to the UWMP, the total water supply for the City is approximately 62,302 AFY. For the same year, the City’s total demand is expected to be 58,878 AFY. The proposed project would create an additional demand of approximately 6.6 AFY, which is approximately 0.01 percent of the total demand. Thus, there is water supply available for the City, and the water supply demanded by the proposed project would be negligible. The UWMP describes the City’s plans to meet full service demands under all foreseeable hydrologic conditions, meeting single dry year and multiple dry year reliability. Table 17 shows the comparison between the supply and demand for projected years between 2025 and 2045 for different hydrologic scenarios. Table 17: City of Anaheim Water Supply and Demand Assessment Supply and Demand Assessment 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison Supply totals 62,302 65,436 66,648 67,954 68,418 Demand totals 58,878 62,700 64,178 65,771 66,337 Difference 3,424 2,736 2,470 2,183 2,081 Single Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison Supply totals 64,952 68,258 69,537 70,915 71,404 Demand totals 62,110 66,142 67,701 69,382 69,979 Difference 2,842 2,116 1,836 1,533 1,425 City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 117 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Supply and Demand Assessment 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Multiple Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison First Year Supply totals 63,169 66,359 67,593 68,923 69,395 Demand totals 59,936 63,826 65,331 66,953 67,529 Difference 3,233 2,533 2,262 1,970 1,866 Second Year Supply totals 64,036 67,283 68,539 69,892 70,373 Demand totals 60,993 64,953 66,484 68,134 68,721 Difference 3,043 2,330 2,055 1,758 1,652 Third Year Supply totals 63,940 67,180 68,433 69,784 70,264 Demand totals 60,876 64,828 66,356 68,003 68,588 Difference 3,064 2,352 2,077 1,781 1,676 Fourth Year Supply totals 62,253 65,384 66,595 67,900 68,364 Demand totals 58,819 62,637 64,114 65,705 66,271 Difference 3,434 2,747 2,481 2,195 2,093 Fifth Year Supply totals 62,783 65,949 67,173 68,492 68,961 Demand totals 59,466 63,326 64,819 66,428 66,999 Difference 3,317 2,623 2,354 2,064 1,962 Source: City of Anaheim UWMP, 2020. City demands are projected to be met with groundwater, imported water, and recycled water supplies with available Metropolitan surplus supplies. The proposed project’s water demand would be accommodated in multiple dry year scenarios. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less than significant impact. The City’s Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Division is responsible for maintenance of the City’s sewer and storm drain lines. The proposed project is within the WAMPSS study area, which consists of approximately 7,450 acres in gross area and approximately 870,000 linear feet of sewer pipelines. A majority of the wastewater from the WAMPSS study area drains into one of the OC Sans trunk sewers for further treatment and final discharge. OC Sans trunk sewers within the WAWPSS study area are located on Knott Avenue, Western Avenue, Orange Avenue, Magnolia Avenue and Euclid Avenue. The remainder of the wastewater flows into neighboring cities including Buena Park, Stanton, and Garden Grove. OC Sans would serve the project site.55 OC Sans has two operating facilities that treat wastewater from residential, 55 Orange County Sanitation District (OC San). 2022. About Us, Service Area web page. Available: https://www.ocsan.gov/about- us/general-information/service-area. Accessed February 16, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 118 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx commercial, and industrial sources, including Plant 1, located at 10844 Ellis Avenue in Fountain Valley, and Plant 2 located at 22212 Brookhurst Street in Huntington Beach. Plant 1 has a current capacity of 144 million gallons per day (MGD) and Plant 2 has a current capacity of 108 MGD. These capacities are expected to expand to 204 MGD for Plant 1 and 144 MGD for Plant 2.56 According to OC Sans, the estimates average daily flow of wastewater received is approximately 118 MGD at Plant No. 1 and 64 MGD at Plant No. 2 for a total of 182 MGD.57 The proposed project would connect to the existing sewer lines in Broadway. The proposed project would ultimately result in a land use designation of Mid Density Residential. According to the WAMPSS land use categories and flow factors, the adjusted flow rates for townhouses for buildout condition would be approximately 215 GPD/du.58 Therefore, the proposed project would generate approximately 7,310 GPD. Using the office use generation factor of 1,650 GPD/acre, the existing site generates approximately 2,558 GPD. Therefore, the proposed project would represent an increase in flow of approximately 4,752 GPD. Table 18 below describes the availability of sewer treatment at the OC Sans plants for the proposed project. Table 18: Orange County Sanitation District Sewer Treatment Availability Plant 2020-2021 Average Daily Flow (mgd) Total Capacity (mgd) Remaining Capacity (mgd) Project Average Daily Flow (mgd) Project’s Percentage of Remaining Capacity (mgd) Plant No. 1 118 144 26 0.009 0.035% Plant No. 2 64 108 44 0.009 0.02% Total 182 252 70 – – Source: California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) 2022. As shown in the table above, there would be adequate treatment capacity for the proposed project’s sewer flows. Additionally, as demonstrated in Appendix G, Sewer Capacity, there is adequate sewer capacity available to accommodate the additional sewer flows from the proposed project, and off- site improvements would not be required Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 56 City of Anaheim. 2004. Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update EIR. Available: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2195/513-Public-Services-and-Facilities?bidId=. Accessed February 17, 2022. 57 Orange County Sanitation District (OC San). 2022. Regional Sewer Service, Facts and Key Statistics web page. Available: https://www.ocsan.gov/services/regional-sewer-service. Accessed February 17, 2022. 58 City of Anaheim. 2019. West Anaheim Mater Plan of Sanitary Sewers. Available: https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/27618/West-Anaheim-MPSS-2019. Accessed February 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 119 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less than significant impact. Republic Services is a private recycling and nonhazardous solid waste hauler and provides solid waste services to the City. Republic Services collects solid waste for all residential, commercial, and industrial waste and recycling services. Solid waste is disposed of in Orange County landfills. Currently, there are three active landfills that are owned and operated by the County, including Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, Olinda Alpha Landfill in Brea, and Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano. In order to ensure that the maximum permitted daily tonnage at a particular landfill is not exceeded, refuse trucks may have to transport material to one or the other.59 The majority of this waste is taken to the Olinda Alpha Sanitary Landfill, which is located in the City of Brea. The Olinda Alpha Landfill is the closest facility to the City and would likely be the solid waste facility most often receiving waste from the project site.60 According to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Solid Waste Information System (SWIS), the landfills that serve the City have the following capacities, as described in Table 19. Table 19: Orange County Landfill Availability Landfill Landfill Address Closure Date Maximum Daily Permitted Throughput (tons per day) Maximum Permitted Capacity (cubic yards) Remaining Capacity (cubic yards) Frank R. Bowerman 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road, Irvine CA 92618 2053 11,500 266,000,000 205,000,000 Olinda Alpha 1942 North Valencia Avenue, Brea CA 92823 2036 8,000 148,800.000 17,500,000 Prima Deshecha 32250 Avenida La Pata, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 2102 4,000 172,100,000 134,300,000 Source: California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Facility Search, 2022. The proposed project would replace existing uses to develop 34 dwelling units, or households. CalRecycle provides a solid waste generation factor to estimate the amount of solid waste generated by residential projects. Using the generate rate of 12.23 pounds (lbs) per household per day for residential development, the proposed project would generate approximately 416 lbs per day of solid waste, or approximately 0.19 tons per day. Therefore, the proposed project would represent approximately 0.002 percent of the maximum daily permitted throughput for the Olinda Alpha Landfill, which would likely receive the most solid waste from the project site. Therefore, the existing 59 City of Anaheim. 2004. Anaheim General Plan/Zoning C ode Update EIR. Available: http://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/2195/513-Public-Services-and-Facilities?bidId=. Accessed February 17, 2022. 60 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2022. Solid Waste Information System (SWIS). Available: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2750?siteID=2085. Accessed February 17, 2022. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 120 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx landfills have sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project and solid waste generated during construction and operations would represent a negligible increase compared to the daily permitted tonnage at landfills. Additionally, the proposed project would also include recycling programs to reduce solid waste and comply with all applicable regulations for solid waste. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. e) Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than significant impact. The City complies with all Federal, State and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Regulations specifically applicable to the proposed project include the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), Senate Bill (SB) 2202, SB 1016, 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Section 4.408, and AB 341, which requires multiple-family residential development and commercial uses to implement recycling programs In 1989, the Legislature adopted the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), in order to “reduce, recycle, and re-use solid waste generated in the state to the maximum extent feasible.” AB 939 established a waste management hierarchy and required that each county prepare a new Integrated Waste Management Plan and each city prepare a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) by July 1, 1991. The SRRE is required to identify how each jurisdiction would meet the mandatory State waste diversion goal of 50 percent by and after the year 2000. SB 2202 made a number of changes to the municipal solid waste diversion requirements under AB 939. These changes included a revision to the statutory requirement for 50 percent diversion of solid waste to clarify that local governments shall continue to divert 50 percent of all solid waste on and after January 1, 2000. SB 1016 introduced a per capita disposal measurement system that measures the 50 percent diversion requirement using a disposal measurement equivalent. The Bill repealed the State Water Board’s 2-year process, requiring instead that the State Water Board make a finding whether each jurisdiction was in compliance with the Act’s diversion requirements for calendar year 2006 and to determine compliance for the 2007 calendar year and beyond, based on the jurisdiction’s change in its per capita disposal rate. The State Water Board is required to review a jurisdiction’s compliance with those diversion requirements in accordance with a specified schedule, which is conditioned upon the State Water Board finding that the jurisdiction complies with those requirements or has implemented its SRRE and household hazardous waste element. The Bill requires the State Water Board to issue an order of compliance if the State Water Board finds that the jurisdiction has failed to make a good faith effort to implement its SSRE or its household hazardous waste element, pursuant to a specified procedure. The per capita disposal rate is a jurisdiction-specific index, which is used as one of several “factors” in determining a jurisdiction’s compliance with the intent of AB 939 and allows CalRecycle and jurisdictions to set their primary focus on successful implementation of diversion programs. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 121 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx CALGreen Section 4.408 requires preparation of a Construction Waste Management Plan that provides an overview of ways in which the applicant would recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris. During the construction phase, the proposed project would be required to comply with CALGreen through the recycling and reuse of at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition debris from the project site. Participation in the City’s recycling programs during project construction and operation, including CalRecycle’s requirements, would ensure that the proposed project would not conflict with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. Additionally, solid waste would be disposed of at existing Orange County Waste and Recycling landfills. Disposal of solid waste would comply with all federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. During operation, the proposed project would include receptacles for recyclables and garbage. Thus, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 122 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.19 Wildfire If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Environmental Evaluation Setting According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone Map, the project site is not within a State Responsibility Area (SRA). The project site is in a Non- VHFHSZ zone within a LRA.61 Would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No impact. As discussed in Setting, the proposed project is not located in or near an SRA or land classified as VHFHSZ. Therefore, no impact would occur. According to the City’s Know Your Way Evacuation Zones web page, the project site is located outside of the evacuation zones area and the streets surrounding the proposed project would not be used for this evacuation program.62 Further, project construction would not require the complete closure of any public or private streets or roadways during construction. Temporary construction 61 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). 2022. Fire Hazard Severity Zone online viewer. Available: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed February 16, 2022. 62 City of Anaheim. 2022. Know Your Way Evacuation Zone web page. Available: https://anaheim.net/6063/Know-Your -Way - Evacuation-Zones. Accessed February 16, 2022. City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 123 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx activities would not impede use of the road for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in inadequate emergency access. No impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? No impact. As discussed above and in Setting, the project site is not within or near an SRA or land classified as VHFHSZ. Furthermore, the project site does not have features with the potential to exacerbate wildfire. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Thus, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No impact. As discussed above and in Setting, the project site is not within or near an SRA or land classified as VHFHSZ. Furthermore, the project site does include the installation of infrastructure that would exacerbate wildfire risk. The proposed project is in an urbanized area and would connect to the existing infrastructure. Therefore, the proposed project would not exacerbate fire risk. Thus, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? No impact. As discussed above and in Setting, the proposed project is not located in or near an SRA or land classified as VHFHSZ. Therefore, no impact would occur related to loss, injury, or death as a result of exposure to wildfires. The proposed project does not have other features with the potential to exacerbate wildfire, downstream flooding, or landslide risks. Because the proposed project is located in an urbanized area, it would not require the installation of maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or result in ongoing impacts to the environment. Further, as discussed in Section 2.10, the proposed project is not located in an area subject to flood hazards, and the proposed project would not contribute to runoff or flooding. Thus, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is required. Mitigation Measures None required. Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 124 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less than Significant Impact No Impact 2.20 Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Environmental Evaluation a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. Based on the analysis provided in Section 2.4, Biological Resources, the proposed project’s impacts related to special-status species would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Because there is a potential for protected bird’s nests to occur on the project site, MM BIO-1 would be implemented. Implementation of MM BIO-1, which would require pre-construction surveys and avoidance measures, would reduce impacts to special-status species. With implementation of MM BIO-1, the proposed project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, reduce fish or wildlife habitat, reduce fish or wildlife populations below self-sustaining levels, eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Based on the analysis provided in Section 2.5, Cultural Resources, the proposed project’s impacts related to California history or prehistory would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. While there are no known historic resources on the project site, it is possible that earthmoving City of Anaheim–West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Checklist and Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Evaluation FirstCarbon Solutions 125 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx activities associated with construction could encounter previously undiscovered historic resources. Implementation of MM CUL-1 would establish a procedure for handling historical resources that may be discovered prior to and during project construction and ensure that potential impacts on historic resources are reduced to a less than significant level. Additionally, there are no known archaeological resources on the project site, but there is always a possibility that earthmoving activities associated with construction could encounter previously undiscovered archaeological resources. Implementation of MM CUL-1 would ensure that potential impacts on archaeological resources are reduced to a less than significant level. Additionally, there is a low potential that earthmoving activities associated with project construction could potentially damage or destroy previously undiscovered human remains. MM CUL-2 specifies the procedures to follow in the event human remains are uncovered. In addition to compliance with required guidelines and statutes, implementation of MM CUL-2 would reduce potential impacts on human remains to a less than significant level. MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, and MM TCR-4 In addition to reducing impacts on historic and prehistoric resources, implementation of MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, and MM TCR-4 would also reduce any impacts on TCRs. Based on the discussion provided above, compliance with required guidelines and statutes and implementation of the mitigation measures, the proposed project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with incorporation of MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, and MM CUL-2. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than significant impact. The analysis presented in this Draft IS/MND includes a review of proposed project's potential impacts related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise, and transportation, among other environmental issue areas. Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would comply with federal, State, and local regulations, including building codes and planning documents, to avoid adverse effects to resources or mitigate for significant impacts to these resources. No cumulative impacts were identified in any topical area. Moreover, as presented throughout this Draft IS/MND, the proposed project’s incremental contribution to cumulative impacts would either be less than significant with mitigation incorporated, less than significant, or there would be no impacts. Section 2.3, Air Quality, analyzed cumulative impacts related to pollutants and determined that regional daily construction emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance, and that net daily operational emissions and net long-term operational emissions would not exceed any of SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance. Therefore, proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of operational emissions, and there would be no cumulative Environmental Checklist and City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Environmental Evaluation Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 126 FirstCarbon Solutions Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx impacts related to air quality. As demonstrated throughout this Draft IS/MND, the proposed project would not result in other cumulative impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would cause less than significant cumulative impacts, and no mitigation is required. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated. Based on the discussion provided in the Project Description and the analysis presented in Sections 2.1 through 2.19 of this Draft IS/MND, the proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the project’s potential impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. Therefore, with implementation of MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, MM TCR-4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1, the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Mitigation Measures Implementation of MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2, MM TCR-3, MM TCR- 4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1. City of Anaheim –West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration List of Preparers FirstCarbon Solutions 127 Https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN-JN)/0055/00550087/Checklist/00550087 Anaheim West Broadway Townhome Project Checklist.docx SECTION 3: LIST OF PREPARERS FirstCarbon Solutions 250 Commerce, Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92602 Phone: 714.508.4100 Project Director ....................................................................................................... Glenn Lajoie, AICP Project Manager................................................................................................................... Cecilia So Assistant Project Manager ....................................................................................... Rachel Krusenoski Environmental Analyst............................................................................................ Stephanie Shepard Biologist .......................................................................................................................Alec Villanueva Archaeologist ............................................................................................................... Stefanie Griffin Publications Manager ........................................................................................................ Susie Harris Word Processor .......................................................................................................... Melissa Ramirez GIS/Graphics ........................................................................................................... Karlee McCracken Vista Environmental—Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, and Noise Subconsultant Greg Tonkovich, Secretary and Senior Analyst 1021 Didrickson Way Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Phone: 949.510.5355 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Attachment No. 7a West Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendices https://www.anaheim.net/6250/ Project Description  Proposed Residential Project at 1161‐1673 W. Broadway, Anaheim, CA  The proposed residential project includes 34 single family attached homes on 1.55 acres (21.93  du/acre).  All homes are proposed to be for‐sale at market rate.  The requested entitlements for  the project include a General Plan Amendment to Mid‐Density Residential, Zoning  Reclassification to RM‐3.5 (Multiple‐Family Residential), Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional  Use Permit with modified development standards, and a Development Agreement for a  voluntary contribution to the City’s affordable housing program.    The proposed townhome units will have attached two‐car garages with a mix of tandem and  side‐by‐side configurations as well as private decks and patios (private open space).  The homes  range in size from 1,062 sf to 1,633 square feet with 2‐4 bedrooms and 2.5‐4 bathrooms.  The units will be served by a private drive aisle accessed from Broadway Street.  The private  drive aisle as well as all common open space, private utilities serving the project, and building  exteriors (including roofs) will be maintained by a Homeowner’s Association.    In addition to 68 garage parking spaces, there will be 32 guest parking spaces on site including  two ADA.  To ensure the garage parking spaces remain open for the use of residential parking,  all owners will be required to sign a disclosure (or CC&Rs) that specifies that only the parking of  vehicles will be permitted in the designated parking areas and garages. In no instance shall  items be stored in garages so as to impede the parking of two vehicles. Furthermore, the  tandem spaces will be in a private, attached garage assigned to the same unit. The HOA  management will be responsible for enforcement for quarterly inspections to ensure that no  personal items are being stored in the garage parking spaces.  The project site currently contains a 14,144 square foot office building and associated parking  lot that will be demolished as part of the proposed project.  The site is surrounded by churches  to the east and west and multi‐family residential to the north and south.     ATTACHMENT NO. 8 2020291 | 06-07-22 City Ventures Contact: Kim Prijatel 3121 Michelson Drive, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92612 949.258.7540 | www.CityVentures.com WHA. Architects . Planners . Designers . Contact: Nick Manea 680 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300, Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.250.0607 | www.WHAinc.com First City Submittal Submittal Log File No.: 02/22/2021 06/21/2021 10/25/2021 12/14/2021 Second City Submittal Third City Submittal Fourth City Submittal ARCHITECTURE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN .................................................SP-1 CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN .....................................SP-2 SITE PLAN WINDOW ANALYSIS ........................................SP-3 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-1 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-2 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-3 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-4 BUILDING 201 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-5 BUILDING 201 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-6 BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-7 BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-8 BUILDING 301 | Conceptual Floor Plans ............................A-9 BUILDING 301 | Conceptual Elevations .............................A-10 TRASH ENCLOSURE|Conceptual Floor Plan & Elevations ....A-11 SHEET LIST: LANDSCAPE Existing Landscape Condition ...........................................L-1 Conceptual Landscape Plan ..............................................L-2 Transformer Landscape Screening Exhibit ..........................L-3 Design Imagery ................................................................L-4 Conceptual Irrigation Master Plan ......................................L-5 Conceptual Wall And Fence Plan .......................................L-6 Conceptual Master Plant Palette ........................................L-7 CIVIL Title Sheet ....................................................................... C -1 Preliminary Site Plan ........................................................C -2 Preliminary Grading Plan ..................................................C -3 Sections ..........................................................................C -4 Preliminary Utility Plan .....................................................C -5 Preliminary Fire Access & Hydrant Location Plan ...............C -6 Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials and Application May Vary. 1661 - 1673 W BROADWAY Anaheim, CA C2 Collaborative Contact: Niki Wu 100 Avenida Miramar, San Clemente, CA 92672 949.366.6624 | www.c2collaborative.com C&V Consulting Contact: Joy Hendricks 9830 Irvine Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92618 949.916.3800 | www.cvc-inc.net 03/22/2022 06/07/2022 Planning Commission Submittal Planning Commission Submittal ATTACHMENT NO. 9 SP-11661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN W Broadway Existing RM-4: 2-Story Apartments Existing T - Transitional Zone: Passion Bread of Life Christian Church Existing C-G - General Commercial: Shalom Mission Baptist Church Existing C-G - General Commercial: Strip Mall Existing RM-4: 2-Story Apartments 5 Bldg 201 4 Bldg 200 3 Bldg 301 2 Bldg 300 1 Bldg 100 Zoning Summary Existing General Plan:Office - Low Proposed General Plan: Mid Density Existing Zoning: C-G - General Commercial Proposed Zoning: RM-3.5 - Multiple-Family Residential Max. Density: 27 Homes per Acre Building Setbacks: Front Yard: 20' Interior Side Yard: 15' Street Side Yard: 15' Rear Yard: 15' Building Separation: Varies Max. Building Height: 40' and 3 Stories Max. Lot Coverage: 50% Notes: 1. Site plan is for conceptual purposes only. 2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance. 3. Base information per civil engineer. 4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information 5. Building Footprints might change due to the final design elevation style. 6. Open space area is subject to change due to the balcony design of the elevation. 7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. | 2020291 | 03-22-22C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1661 BROADWAY SITE ANAHEIM, CA CONCEPT STUDY Project Summary Total Site Area:+ 1.55 Acres (+ 67,693 SF) Total Units:34 Homes ▪(6) Plan 1: + 1,062 SF, 2 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath ▪(4) Plan 2a: + 1,342 SF, 2 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, Loft ▪(4) Plan 2b: + 1,342 SF, 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath ▪(10) Plan 3: + 1,317 SF, 3 Bedroom, 3 Bath ▪(10) Plan 4: + 1,633 SF, 4 Bedroom, 4 Bath, Opt. Den Density:21.93 Homes per Acre Parking: Required: 100 Spaces (2.94 spaces per home) ▪(10) 2 Bedroom x 2.25 Spaces = 22.5 Spaces ▪(14) 3 Bedroom x 3.0 Spaces = 42 Spaces ▪(10) 4 Bedroom x 3.5 Spaces = 35 Spaces Provided: 100 Spaces (2.94 spaces per home) ▪Garage: 68 Spaces ▪Head In: 30 Spaces (8.5' x 18'; includes 1 Future EV space) ▪ADA: 2 Spaces (9' x 18') Open Space: Required: 9,350 SF Total (275 SF per home) ▪Common: xx SF (10' min. dim.) ▪Private: xx SF (10' min. dim. ground, 7' min. dim deck) Provided: 9,480 SF Total (+ 279 per home) ▪Common: 7,499 SF (10' Min. Dimension) ▪Private: 1,981 SF - Ground: 1,281 SF (10' Min. Dimension) - Deck: 700 SF (7' Min. Dimension) Lot Coverage:23,084 SF (34.1% of site) Fire turnaround per Anaheim Fire Department Dead-end turn around space Common trash, bulky item pickup area, and mailbox location Proposed transformer location Accessible path of travel Clear story window at living room on 2nd floor. Small secondary windows at 3rd floor bedroom. Clear story windows at kitchen and living room on 2nd floor and bedroom on 3rd floor. Clear story windows at kitchen and living room on 2nd floor and bedroom on 3rd floor.Reduced landscape setback at end of parking stalls and drive aisle. Proposed sign to read, " NO TURNAROUND. RESIDENT ONLY PARKING BEYOND THIS POINT." SP-2 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN 1661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA W Broadway Existing RM-4: 2-Story Apartments Existing T - Transitional Zone: Passion Bread of Life Christian Church Existing C-G - General Commercial: Shalom Mission Baptist Church Existing C-G - General Commercial: Strip Mall Existing RM-4: 2-Story Apartments 5 Bldg 201 4 Bldg 200 3 Bldg 301 2 Bldg 300 1 Bldg 100 Notes: 1.Site plan is for conceptual purposes only. 2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance. 3. Base information per civil engineer. 4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information 5. Building Footprints might change due to the final design elevation style. 6. Open space area is subject to change due to the balcony design of the elevation. 7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. | 2020291 | 03-22-22C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN 1661 BROADWAY SITE ANAHEIM, CA CONCEPT STUDY Zoning Summary Existing General Plan: Office - Low Proposed General Plan: Mid Density Existing Zoning: C-G - General Commercial Proposed Zoning: RM-3.5 - Multiple-Family Residential Max. Density: 27 Homes per Acre Building Setbacks: Front Yard: 20' Interior Side Yard: 15' Street Side Yard: 15' Rear Yard: 15' Building Separation: Varies Max. Building Height: 40' and 3 Stories Max. Lot Coverage: 50% Project Summary Total Site Area:+ 1.55 Acres (+ 67,693 SF) Total Units:34 Homes ▪(6) Plan 1: + 1,062 SF, 2 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath ▪(4) Plan 2a: + 1,342 SF, 2 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath, Loft ▪(4) Plan 2b: + 1,342 SF, 3 Bedroom, 2.5 Bath ▪(10) Plan 3: + 1,317 SF, 3 Bedroom, 3 Bath ▪(10) Plan 4: + 1,633 SF, 4 Bedroom, 4 Bath, Opt. Den Density:21.93 Homes per Acre Parking: Required: 100 Spaces (2.94 spaces per home) ▪(10) 2 Bedroom x 2.25 Spaces = 22.5 Spaces ▪(14) 3 Bedroom x 3.0 Spaces = 42 Spaces ▪(10) 4 Bedroom x 3.5 Spaces = 35 Spaces Provided: 100 Spaces (2.94 spaces per home) ▪Garage: 68 Spaces ▪Head In: 30 Spaces (8.5' x 18'; includes 1 Future EV space) ▪ADA: 2 Spaces (9' x 18') Open Space: Required: 9,350 SF Total (275 SF per home) ▪Common: xx SF (10' min. dim.) ▪Private: xx SF (10' min. dim. ground, 7' min. dim deck) Provided: 9,480 SF Total (+ 279 per home) ▪Common: 7,499 SF (10' Min. Dimension) ▪Private: 1,981 SF - Ground: 1,281 SF (10' Min. Dimension) - Deck: 700 SF (7' Min. Dimension) Lot Coverage:23,084 SF (34.1% of site) SP-31661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 W Broadway 5 Bldg 201 4 Bldg 200 3 Bldg 301 2 Bldg 300 1 Bldg 100 Notes: 1.Site plan is for conceptual purposes only. 2. Site plan must be reviewed by planning, building, and fire departments for code compliance. 3. Base information per civil engineer. 4. Civil engineer to verify all setbacks and grading information 5. Building Footprints might change due to the final design elevation style. 6. Open space area is subject to change due to the balcony design of the elevation. 7. Building setbacks are measured from property lines to building foundation lines. | 2020291 | 09-17-21C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 0 15 30 60 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1661 BROADWAY SITE ANAHEIM, CA CONCEPT STUDY 0 15 30 60 SITE PLAN WINDOW ANALYSIS 1 NOTE: All windows into primary use rooms are clear story windows to mitigate the reduced setback at property line. WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Living Room 3. Master Bath 4. Bath 2 WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Stairway 4. Stairway 5. Bath 3 6. Bath 2 7. Stairway 8. W.I.C. WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Stairway 4. Stairway 5. Bath 3 6. Bath 2 7. Stairway 8. W.I.C. BUILDING 200 BUILDING 301 BUILDING 300 BUILDING 100 1 2 4 3 2 1 7 5 4 6 2 1 7 5 4 6 WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Bath 3 4. Bath 2 5. Master Bath 6. Master Bedroom WINDOW DESCRIPTION 1. Entry 2. Great Room 3. Bath 3 4. Bath 2 5. Master Bath 6. Master Bedroom BUILDING 201 3 3 2 2 1 1 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 8 8 3 A-11661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Floor Plans A-21661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 100 | Conceptual Elevations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding Deck Accents: Horizontal Metal Railing Window & Door Trim: Vinyl Entr y Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors A-31661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Floor Plans HYBRIDW/H EVSECHSUP 17R (U.N.O.)16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORFX1860 6020 SL HYBRIDW/H 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR EVSECHSFX18 60 3668UP 17R (U.N.O.) HYBRIDW/H 28SC68EVSEELEC 30SC80BI-PASS40682468 2668C HSCHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*6050 SL28 6830SC80ELECEVSE W/H HYBRIDUP 17R(U.N.O.)*6050 SL 286830SC80ELECEVSE W/H HYBRIDUP 17R(U.N.O.)*60 50 SL HYBRIDW/H 28SC68EVSEELEC 30SC80BI-PASS406824 682668C HSCHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*60 50 SLTEMP. GL.60 20SLTEMP. .3020L30 80FR. DOORT.G.246828 68 TEMP. GL. 30 20 SL 7050 SL 6050 SL UP 17R DN 17R TEMP. GL.3020SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.246828 68 TEMP. GL. 30 20 SL 7050 SL 6050 SL UP 17R DN 17R246826 68 24 68 24 68 VC 60 50 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.C HS C HS UP 17R DN 17R 60 50 SL24 68 26 68 24 68 24 68 VC 6050 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.C HS C HS UP 17R DN 17R 6050 SL 26 6824 6824 68C HS C HSC HS UP 17R DN 18R BI-PASS5068 30 80FR. DOORT.G.6050 SL TEMP. GL.60 50SLTEMP. GL.20 40SHTEMP. GL.20 40SHTEMP. GL. 60 50 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.FXTEMP. GL.6020TEMP. GL.2040SH26 68246824 68C HS C HSC HS UP 17R DN 18R BI-PASS5068 60 50 SL 11'-6"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 13'-7"11'-9"x MASTER BEDROOM BATH 2 LIN. DN Plan 4 4 Bdrm / 4 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,573 SF Plan 3 3 Bdrm / 3 Ba 2 Car Tandem Garage +/-1,320 SF 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 3 M.BATH M.BATH 11'-1"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM BATH 2 12'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 2 DN W.I.C. W.I.C.W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. 12'-0"12'-6"x MASTER BEDROOM W.I.C. 10'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 BATH 3 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 W.I.C. 10'-0"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 M.BATH DN PWDR 11'-7"9'-0"x DINING KITCHEN 10'-3"7'-2"x DECK 5'-9"15'-1"x DECK 5'-1"15'-1"x DECK KITCHEN KITCHEN DN DN DN UP UP UP 16'-6"13'-9"x LIVING 16'-6"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY CTS CTS CTS 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. 2-CAR TANDEM 10'-0" x 36'-0" CLR. UP UP UP 12'-0"10'-3"x BEDROOM 4 BATH 4 D.S. SL. SL.SL. 0.25:120.25:12 0.25:12 D.S.D.S.SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL. 0.25:12 SL.0.25:12D.S.SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12Plan 2 3 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,338 SF W.I.C. 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. S W LIN S STORAGE AREA 4'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (128.6 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 6'-10" X 3'-4" X 8'-0" (181.9 CU. FT.) STORAGE AREA 3'-11" X 4'-4" X 8'-0" (135.8 CU. FT.) D BI-PASS4068 2040 SH 30 50SH3050 SH 7050 SL24 682880246824 68 OPTIONAL BI-PASS506826 682668 24 68 DN 17R 6050SLBI-PASS4068 2040 SH 3050SH3050 SH 7050 SL 60 50SL24 682880246824 68 OPTIONAL BI-PASS506826 6826 6824 68 DN 17R26 68 24 68 24 6821068 VC VC24 68 246828682468+24" SHELF VC 26 68 OPTIONAL TEMP. GL.2040SHTEMP. GL. SLIDER6860 DN 17R 6050 SL 26 68 24 68 24 6821068 VC VC2468 24682868 24 68 +24" SHELF VC 26 68 OPTIONAL TEMP. GL.20 40SHTEMP. GL. SLIDER6860 DN 17R 60 50 SL TEMP. GL. 20 40 SH 2468 246824 6828 68 24 6826 68 2468 2868CHS VC C HS 17R +24" SHELF 26 68 OPTIONAL DN 6050 SL TEMP. GL.60 50 SLTEMP. GL.20 40SHTEMP. GL.60 50 SL24 68TEMP. GL.2040SHFX2020TEMP. GL. 2040 SH 24 6824 6828 68 246826 68 2468 2868CHS VC C HS 17R +24" SHELF 26 68 OPTIONAL DN 60 50 SL | 2020291 | 03-10-22C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM A ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 200 First Floor NOTE: 1. SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2. FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. Second FloorThird Floor Occupancy: R2 Construction: VB Sprinkler System: FULL 13 Roof Plan Clerestory Window Clerestory Window A-41661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 200 | Conceptual Elevations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding Deck Accents: Horizontal Metal Railing Window & Door Trim: Vinyl Entr y Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT A-51661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 201 | Conceptual Floor Plans 12'-2"10'-1"x BEDROOM 2 11'-6"11'-9"x MASTER BEDROOM BATH 2 LIN.DN Plan 4 4 Bdrm / 4 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,573 SF Plan 3 3 Bdrm / 3 Ba 2 Car Tandem Garage +/-1,320 SF 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3 M.BATH 11'-1"11'-10"x MASTER BEDROOM BATH 2 11'-6"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 DN W.I.C. W.I.C.W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. 12'-2"12'-6"x MASTER BEDROOM W.I.C. 10'-0"9'-11"x BEDROOM 3 BATH 3 BATH 3 10'-0"10'-1"x BEDROOM 3W.I.C. 10'-4"10'-0"x BEDROOM 2 BATH 2 M.BATH DN PWDR 11'-7"9'-0"x DINING KITCHEN 10'-8"7'-5"x DECK 4'-7"15'-9"x DECK 4'-9"15'-1"x DECK KITCHEN DN DN DN UP UP UP 16'-6"13'-7"x LIVING 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM 16'-10"15'-5"x GREAT ROOM ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR.2-CAR TANDEM 10'-0" x 36'-0" CLR. UP UP UP BATH 4 Plan 2 3 Bdrm / 2.5 Ba 2 Car Garage +/-1,338 SF W.I.C. 2-CAR GARAGE 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLR. S W S STORAGE AREA 3'-11" X 4'-4" X 8'-0" (135.8 CU. FT.) D D.S.SL.SL.SL.0.25:120.25:120.25:12D.S.D.S.SL.0.25:12SL.0.25:12SL.0.25:12SL.0.25:12D.S.SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12SL.0.5:12HYBRIDW/HEVSECHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOORFX18606020SLHYBRIDW/H16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOREVSECHSFX18 603668UP 17R(U.N.O.)28 6830SC80ELECEVSE W/H HYBRIDUP 17R(U.N.O.)*6050 SL HYBRID W/H EVSEELEC 30SC80CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*6050 SL3068306844"X60" CLEAR 36"X48" CLEAR 42"X54" CLEAR 54"X60" CLEAR 42"X48" CLEAR 30"X48" CLEAR 54"X48" CLEAR HYBRID W/H EVSEELEC 30SC80CHSUP 17R(U.N.O.)*60 50 SL3068306844"X60" CLEAR 36"X48" CLEAR 42"X54" CLEAR 54"X60" CLEAR 42"X48" CLEAR 30"X48" CLEAR 54"X48" CLEAR 28 6830SC80ELECEVSE W/H HYBRIDUP 17R(U.N.O.)*60 50 SL FX60 20TEMP. .3020L30 80FR. DOORT.G.246828 68TEMP. GL.3020SL7050SL60 50SLUP 17RDN 17RTEMP. GL.3020SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.246828 68TEMP. GL.3020SL7050SL60 50SLUP 17RDN 17R30 80FR. DOORT.G.TEMP. GL.6050 SL24 6826 68 2468 2468 VC C HS C HS UP 17R DN 17R 6050 SL TEMP. GL. 6050 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.26 6824 6824 68C HS C HSC HS UP 17R DN 18R BI-PASS5068 6050 SL TEMP. GL. 6050 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.26 6824 6824 68C HS C HSC HS UP 17R DN 18R BI-PASS5068 6050 SL FX6020TEMP. GL.2040SH24 6826 68 24 68 24 68 VC C HS C HS UP 17R DN 17R 6050 SL TEMP. GL.6050 SL30 80FR. DOORT.G.BI-PASS406824 682880246824 68OPTIONALBI-PASS506826 68266824 68DN 17RBI-PASS406824 682880246824 68OPTIONALBI-PASS506826 6826 6824 68DN 17R26 68 24 68 24 6821068 VC VC2468 286824 68 +24" SHELF VC 26 68 OPTIONAL TEMP. GL.20 40SHDN 17R 60 50 SL TEMP. GL. 20 40 SH 24 6824 6828 68 24 6826 68 2468 2868CHS VC C HS 17R +24" SHELF 26 68 OPTIONAL DN 60 50 SL 2468 TEMP. GL. SLIDER6860 TEMP. GL. 20 40 SH 246824 6828 68 24 6826 68 2468 2868CHS VC C HS 17R +24" SHELF 26 68 OPTIONAL DN 6050 SL 2468 TEMP. GL. SLIDER6860 TEMP. GL.2040SHTEMP. GL.20 40SH26 68 24 68 24 6821068 VC VC24 68246828682468+24" SHELF VC 26 68 OPTIONAL TEMP. GL.20 40SHDN 17R 6050 SL TEMP. GL.6050SLFX6020M.BATH BATH 2 KITCHEN | 2020291 | 03-10-22C 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. ANAHEIM A ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 Conceptual Floor Plans|Building 201 First Floor NOTE: 1. SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION. 2. FURTHER FLOOR PLAN COORDINATION NEEDED TO REFLECT CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION DESIGN. Second FloorThird Floor Occupancy: R2 Construction: VB Sprinkler System: FULL 13 Roof Plan A-61661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 201 | Conceptual Elevations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations BUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding Deck Accents: Horizontal Metal Railing Window & Door Trim: Vinyl Entr y Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT A-71661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 300 | Conceptual Floor Plans A-81661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 301 | Conceptual Elevations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsBUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding Deck Accents: Horizontal Metal Railing Window & Door Trim: Vinyl Entr y Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT A-91661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 301 | Conceptual Floor Plans A-101661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA 0 4 8 16 CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 BUILDING 301 | Conceptual Elevations Note: Artist’s conception, colors, materials and application may vary. Refer to Landscape Drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locationsBUILDING MATERIAL Roof: Flat with Parapet Exterior: Stucco Finish, Fiber Cement Siding Deck Accents: Horizontal Metal Railing Window & Door Trim: Vinyl Entr y Door: Decorative Front Entry Door Garage Door: Sectional Garage Doors FRONT RIGHT REAR LEFT A-111661 - 1673 W BROADWAY ANAHEIM, CA CITY SUBMITTAL © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. | 2020291 | 06-07-22 0 2 4 8 TRASH ENCLOSURE | Conceptual Floor Plan & Elevations Rear Elevation Front Elevation Floor Plan Left Elevation Right Elevation Roof Plan W. BROADWAY03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-1 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - EXISTING LANDSCAPE CONDITION Washingtonia robusta Syagrus romanzoffiana Jacaranda mimosifolia Yucca rostrata Mexican Fan Palm Queen Palm Jacaranda Beaked Yucca To be removed To be removed To be removed To be removed 3’ to 20’ BTH 16’ BTH 18” Dia 3 to 5 Multi-trunks SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COMMENT EXISTING TREE SCHEDULE: 4,578 sf EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS: 0 8’ 16’ 32’ Scale: 1/16”= 1’-0” A B B2.4’2.37’3.5’3.5’2.11’W. BROADWAY03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-2 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 8’ 16’ 32’ Scale: 1/16”= 1’-0” V:\CTV145- Anaheim Broadway\C2\'P' (Production)\BL-CTV145-P.dwg, 2/19/2021 11:41:17 AM, DWG To PDF.pc3 LEGEND LANDSCAPE TREATEMENT (N.T.S) POWER POLE AREA PLAN (N.T.S.) Street Trees at 20’ o.c. maximum Decor Pottery at Internal Paseo Entry Low Patio Fence/Gate Social Gathering Area with Accent Paving and Specimen Tree Pedestrian Connection Screening Tree Landscape Hedge around the Transformer/Trash Enclosure Parking lot shade trees Sight Triangle Power Pole Fence 6 3 4 7 5 8 9 10 10 2 1 Accessible Route/Path of Travel *Total square footage of proposed landscape area: 11,782 sf. BLDG 1 BLDG 2 BLDG 3 BLDG 4 BLDG 5 1 7 7 88 5 6 6 4 4 5 3 3 3 9 9 2 2 Elevation A Section B-B CL CL 3.5’2.11’ to 2.4’3.5’ 3.5’3.5’3.5’3.5’ 12” Planter Pocket 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-3 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - PEDESTRIAN VIEW 1 PEDESTRIAN VIEW 2 W. BROADWAYKEYMAP 05.17.21ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-1 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE -UTILITY EQUIPMENT SCREENING STUDY TRANSFORMER LANDSCAPE SCREENING EXHIBIT 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-4 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - DESIGN IMAGERY W. BROADWAY03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-5 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - CONCEPTUAL IRRIGATION MASTER PLAN 0 8’ 16’ 32’ Scale: 1/16”= 1’-0” Hydrozone:Eto: KL LA Sq. Ft. Conversion SLA Sq. Ft. MAWA Landscaped Area 49.7 0.55 11,782        0.62 NA 199,678                  MAWA= Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) 0.50= Evapotraspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) 1.0= ETAF for Sprcial Landscaped Area LA= Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) 0.3= the additional ET adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area (1.0‐ 0.7= 0.3) SLA= Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Applicant to fill in boxes below: Eto (Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C inches per year) Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Hydrozone:Eto: KL Sq. Ft. Conversion IE EAWU Low Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.2 8,048          0.62 0.80 61,998                    Medium Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.5 2,630          0.62 0.85 47,671                    High Water Use (Rotor)49.7 0.8 1,104          0.62 0.70 38,878                    High (Water Feature)49.7 1.0 ‐              0.62 1.00 ‐                           Total EAWU:11,782        148,547                  EAWU= Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) KI= Landscape Coefficient LA= Landscaped Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) IE= Irrigation Efficiency= IME X DU (See definication in Appendix E for exmaplne IE percentages) IME= Irrigation Management Efficiency (90%) DU= Distribution Uniformity of Irrigation Head KI= Ks x Kc x Kmc Ks= species factor (range 1.0‐ 0.9) (see WUCOLS list for values) Kd= density factor (range 0.5‐ 1.3) (see WUCOLS list for density value) Kmc= microclimatic factor (range 0.5‐ 1.4) (see WUCOLS) Table A‐ PF (Plant Factor) Cool Season Turf= 0.8 Warm Season Turf= 0.7 High Water Use Plants= 0.7 (can be between 0.7‐0.9) Moderate Water Use Plants= 0.5 (can be between 0.4‐0.6) Low Water Use Plants= 0.3 (can be between 0.1‐0.3) Very Low Water Use Plants= 0.1 IE (Irrigation Efficiency)‐ Appendix E Pop‐up Stream Rotor= 0.75 Rotor Head= 0.75 Microspray= 0.75 Bubblers= 0.8 Drip Emitters= 0.85 Subsurface Irrigation= 0.9 Project Name:  1661 W. Broadway, Anaheim, CA WATER EFFICIENT WORK SHEET Total EAWU = (Eto x KL x LA in Sq.ft. / IE)= Gallons per Year 49.7                           11,782  0 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) Estimated Annual Water Use: Total MAWA = (Eto x 0.50 x LA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)+(Eto x 1.0 x SLA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)= Gallons per year for LA + SLA Date:  Dec 02, 2021 r3 Irrigation Note: 1. All planting areas shall have a fully automatic irrigation system. Utilization water conserving features such as low-precipitation rate heads; low-flow micro sprays or drip irrigation, water sensors and multi-program controllers with weather station capability and drip circuit features. “Water Efficient Landscapes” irrigation system, scheduling and water use WELO calculations shall be designed to meet the requirements of the specifications of the City of Anaheim. 2. Irrigation shown are diagrammatic. Irrigation mainline and lateral shall be installed in shrub beds where allows- lateral piping shall be installed 12” min. below grade and mainline 18” min. below grade, and provide sleeves under all hardscape areas. All irrigation valve boxes shall be located in planting areas- setback from front edge of each valve box to be a minimum of 1’ from the edge of paving or turf areas. 3. All utility infrastructure and other potential conflicts including off site and below-grade that could affect irrigation design considered. IRRIGATION LEGEND High Water Use Medium Water Use Low Water Use SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION GATE VALE QUICK COUPLING VALVE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION 120 VOLT POWER REQUIRED. DRAWS 4 AMPS EACH. PEDESTAL MOUNTED WITHIN LANDSCAPE WATER METER 1" ASSUMED PSI AT METER IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION EQUIPMENT. RPPA BACKFLOW, MASTER VALVE AND FLOW SENSOR IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 IRRIGATION ROADWAY SLEEVE BANK CONSISTING OF 1-4" AND 2-2" SCH 40 PVC SLEEVES IRRIGATION ROADWAY SLEEVE BANK CONSISTING OF 2-2" SCH 40 PVC SLEEVES TREE SPRAY MICRO NOZZLE ON POP-UP, (2) PER TREE C B IRRIGATION_SCHEDULE BUILDING 5 BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 W. BROADWAY03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-6 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - CONCEPTUAL WALL AND FENCE PLAN 0 8’ 16’ 32’ Scale: 1/16”= 1’-0” Patio Fence, 36” ht. Pedestrian Gate, match height of adjacent wall/fence LEGEND METAL PATIO GATE Color: Per Colorist METAL PATIO FENCE Color: Per Colorist 03.17.22ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA L-7 1661 W. BROADWAY SITE - CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANT PALETTE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WUCOLS SHRUB SCHEDULE: Agave spp. Aloe spp. Asparagus densiflorus ‘Myers Fern’ Bougainvillea ‘La Jolla’ Dianella revoluta ‘Little Rev’ Dasylirion wheeleri Hesperaloe parviflora ‘Brake Lights’ Lavandula dentata Leucophyllum f. ‘Green Cloud’ Ligustrum japonicum ‘Texanum’ Lomandra longifolia Prunus caroliniana ‘Bright n Tight’ Rhaphiolepis i. ‘Clara’ Rhaphiolepis i. ‘Majestic Beauty’ Rosa spp. Agave spp. Aloe spp. Myers Fern Asparagus La Jolla Bougainvillea Little Rev Flax Lily Desert Spoon Brake Lights Red Yucca French Lavender Green Cloud Texas Sage Waxleaf Privet Spiny-headed Mat Rush Cherry Laurel Clara Indian Hawthorn Majestic Beauty Hawthorn Rose spp. 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 15 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 15 gal 5 gal 5 gal 5 gal 36” o.c. 30” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 24” o.c. 48” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 30” o.c. 30” o.c. 36” o.c. 36” o.c. 24: o.c. 36” o.c. 30” o.c. L L M L L VL VL L L M L M L L M BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE FORM WUCOLS TREE SCHEDULE: Street Trees Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Platanus racemosa Accent Trees Jacaranda mimosifolia Quercus virginiana Patio Trees Arbutus unedo ‘Marina’ Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’ Screen Trees Podocarpus macrophyllus Tristania conferta Vertical Trees Aloe ‘Hercules’ Podocarpus macrophyllus Little Gem Magnolia Western Sycamore Jacaranda Southern Live Oak Marina Strawberry Tree Bradford Pear Yew Pine Brisbane Box Hercules Aloe Yew Pine 36” min 24” min 36” min 24”min 24” min 36” min 24” min 24” min 24” min 24” min Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard M M M M L M M M L M BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WUCOLS GROUNDCOVER SCHEDULE: Bulbine frutescens ‘Tiny Tangerine’ Carissa macrocarpa ‘Green Carpet’ Lantana montevidensis Senecio mandraliscae Trachelospermum jasminoides Tiny Tangerine Bulbine Green Carpet Natal Plum Trailing Lantana Kleinia Star Jasmine 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 18” o.c. 24” o.c. 24” o.c. 18” o.c. 24” o.c. L L L L M Note: 1. Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows. Shrubbery or ground cover should not generally exceed three feet in height and tree branches should not descend below six feet from the ground. 2. Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult. 0 SCALE: 1" = 40' 20 40 80 C-1 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 DRIVEWAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED PER STD 115-B. 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE C-2 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE C-3 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE C-4 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE C-5 0 SCALE: 1" = 30' 15 30 60 FIRE LANE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE C-6 ATTACHMNT NO. 9 ATTCHMENT NO. 10 UNITED STATES  T +1 888 826 5814  T +1 714 508 4100  F +1 714 508 4110  E info@fcs‐intl.com  Irvine  250 Commerce  Suite 250  Irvine, CA 92602  Bay Area  1350 Treat Boulevard  Suite 380  Walnut Creek, CA 94597  Central Valley  7726 N. First Street  #413  Fresno, CA 93720  Inland Empire  967 Kendall Drive  #A‐537  San Bernardino, CA 92407  Sacramento Valley  2351 Sunset Boulevard  Suite 170‐301  Rocklin, CA 95765  Utah  2901 Bluegrass Boulevard  Suite 200‐62  Lehi, UT 84043  Connecticut  2 Corporate Drive  Suite 450  Shelton, CT 06484  New York  10 Monument Street  Deposit, NY 13754  56 Broome Corporate Parkway  Conklin, NY 13748  CANADA  UNITED KINGDOM  PORTUGAL  FRANCE  KENYA  AUSTRALIA  PHILIPPINES  CHINA  MALAYSIA  SINGAPORE  ii  Cover Letter  June 6, 2022  Andy Uk, Associate Planner  Anaheim Planning & Building Department  200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162  Anaheim, CA 92805   Subject: West Broadway Townhome Project, Anaheim – Responses to Comments  Dear Mr. Uk:   FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS) is pleased to submit this Response to Comments letter for the  proposed West  Broadway Townhome Project (project) in the City of Anaheim.  To  date, the following letter has been received with regard to the proposed project:  Letter #1: Letter from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 12, dated May 25, 2022. Although a Lead Agency is not required to provide written responses to comments on  Negative Declarations or Mitigated Negative Declarations under the California Environmental  Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Anaheim has evaluated the comments received on the West  Broadway Townhome Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and has  elected to provide responses to comments.  None of the comments received resulted in the  need to recirculate the IS/MND or to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).  This letter includes a list of the comments and responses to comments on the Draft IS/MND.  A copy of the letter received regarding the Draft IS/MND is included in Attachment A.  Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.  Sincerely,  Cecilia So, Senior Project Manager  FirstCarbon Solutions  250 Commerce, Suite 250  Irvine, CA 92602  Enc: Attachment A: Comment Letter  ATTACHMENT NO. 11   1    Proposal  RESPONSE TO COMMENTS  The comment letter is included in Attachment A of this memo and summarized below.  A list of public  agencies, organizations, and individuals who commented on the Draft IS/MND is presented below.  Each  comment has been assigned a code.  Individual comments within each communication have been  numbered so comments can be cross‐referenced with responses.  Following this list, the text of the  communication is reprinted and followed by the corresponding response.  Author Code  Caltrans, District 12 ......................................................................................................................... CALTRANS    Letter from Caltrans, District 12 Dated May 25, 2022  Comment CALTRANS-1  The proposed project is outside of State right of way, however, a discussion of any potential impacts to  state on‐ramp and off‐ramp intersections as a result of the proposed project should be identified in the  project documentation.  Response to CALTRANS-1  As discussed in the Traffic  Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by TJW  Engineering, Inc. dated October 29,  2021, and included as Appendix K of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed project is anticipated to generate  15 PM peak‐hour trips. Conservatively, the TIA did not take trip credit for the existing uses on the project  site that would be demolished as part of project implementation. Thus, the project’s contributions to the  I‐5 Freeway ramps would be nominal.  Comment CALTRANS-2  The project is to develop residential housing, which may increase traffic congestion and number of Single  Occupancy Vehicle  (SOV) trips. As Caltrans seeks to promote safe, accessible multimodal transportation,  consider including a discussion on potentially improving multimodal transportation (i.e., walking, biking,  and transit) options as part of the project development. Providing improved multimodal connections to  the project site that can encourage residents to utilize alternative transportation options, thus reducing  GHG emissions, congestion, and VMT. This also improves public health. Also, please consider including a  discussion on general transportation safety improvements, especially for vulnerable road users such as  bicyclists and pedestrians.  Response to CALTRANS-2  As discussed in Section 2.17, Transportation, of the Draft IS/MND, the proposed project would include a  pedestrian‐friendly design including sidewalks and streetlights for pedestrians. The sidewalks would  connect to the existing sidewalks along Broadway. Furthermore, a Class II bicycle lane is proposed along    2    Proposal  Broadway and an existing Class II bicycle lane is located along South Euclid Street, approximately 382  feet west of the project site. The nearest bus stop is located approximately 382 feet  west of the project  site near the intersection of South Euclid Street and Broadway. This bus stop provides service to OCTA  Route 37. Approximately 0.25‐mile north of the project site is another bus stop which provides service to  OCTA Route 42. The proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts to public transit, bicycle,  or pedestrian facilities.  Comment CALTRANS-3  Caltrans encourages the design of Complete Streets that include high‐quality pedestrian, bicycle, and  transit facilities that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. Improvements may  include providing secure bicycle parking, pedestrian‐oriented LED lighting, and comfortable connections  to nearby active transportation and/or transit facilities. Complete Streets improvements also promote  regional connectivity, improve air quality, reduce congestion, promote improved first‐/last‐mile  connections, and increase safety or all modes of transportation.  Response to CALTRANS-3  Comment noted.   Comment CALTRANS-4  In the event of any work within Caltrans right of way discretionary review and approval by Caltrans and  an encroachment permit will be required prior to construction. Additional information regarding  encroachment permits may be obtained by contacting the Caltrans Permits Office at (657) 328‐6553. For  specific details on Caltrans Encroachment Permits procedure and any future updates regarding the  application process and permit rates, please visit the Caltrans Encroachment Permits homepage at  https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic‐operations/ep.  Response to CALTRANS-4  It is not anticipated that the proposed project will involve any work within Caltrans right of way or in  close enough proximity that an Encroachment Permit would be required.  However, the applicant will be  made aware of this requirement and will comply with the Encroachment Permit requirements, if  applicable.        Proposal  Attachment A:   Caltrans Comment Letter  “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” STATE OF CALIFORNIA—CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 12 ൬൲൰൫ EAST ൯TH STREET, SUITE ൬൫൫ SANTA ANA, CA ൴൭൲൫൰ PHONE (൱൰൲) ൮൭൳-൱൫൫൫ FAX (൱൰൲) ൮൭൳-൱൰൭൭ TTY ൲൬൬ www.dot.ca.gov/caltrans-near-me/district12 Making Conservation California Way of Life. May 25, 2022 Mr. Andy Uk City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite162 Anaheim, CA 92805 File: IGR/CEQA SCH#:2022050092 LDR LOG #2022-01964 I-5 Dear Mr. Uk, Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the review of Notice of Intent (NOI) for a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Broadway Townhome Project. The project proposes the development of 34 attached townhomes in five residential buildings and associated improvements on 1.55 acres in two parcels. All homes would be three stories tall and would include attached 2-car side-by-side or tandem parking garages on the ground-level floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via one main driveway entry from West Broadway. The project site is approximately 0.56 mile west of Interstate 5 (I-5), the Santa Ana Freeway. The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. Caltrans is a responsible agency on this project and has the following comments: Traffic Operations 1. The proposed project is outside of State right of way, however, a discussion of any potential impacts to state on-ramp and off-ramp intersections as a result of the proposed project should be identified in the project documentation. Mr. Andy Uk May 25, 2022 Page 2 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” System Planning 2. The project is to develop residential housing, which may increase traffic congestion and number of Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) trips. As Caltrans seeks to promote safe, accessible multimodal transportation, consider including a discussion on potentially improving multimodal transportation (i.e., walking, biking, and transit) options as part of the project development. Providing improved multimodal connections to the project site that can encourage residents to utilize alternative transportation options, thus reducing GHG emissions, congestion, and VMT. This also improves public health. Also, please consider including a discussion on general transportation safety improvements, especially for vulnerable road users such as bicyclists and pedestrians. 3. Caltrans encourages the design of Complete Streets that include high- quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that are safe and comfortable for users of all ages and abilities. Improvements may include providing secure bicycle parking, pedestrian-oriented LED lighting, and comfortable connections to nearby active transportation and/or transit facilities. Complete Streets improvements also promote regional connectivity, improve air quality, reduce congestion, promote improved first-/last-mile connections, and increase safety or all modes of transportation. Encroachment Permit 4. In the event of any work within Caltrans right of way discretionary review and approval by Caltrans and an encroachment permit will be required prior to construction. Additional information regarding encroachment permits may be obtained by contacting the Caltrans Permits Office at (657) 328-6553. For specific details on Caltrans Encroachment Permits procedure and any future updates regarding the application process and permit rates, please visit the Caltrans Encroachment Permits homepage at https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ep. Mr. Andy Uk May 25, 2022 Page 3 “Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” Please continue to coordinate with Caltrans for any future developments that could potentially impact State transportation facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Maryam Molavi, at (657) 328-6280 or Maryam.Molavi@dot.ca.gov. Sincerely, Scott Shelley Branch Chief, Regional-IGR-Transit Planning District 12 S EUCLID STW BROADWAY W PAMPAS LN S QUADRILATERAL WAYW RHOMBUS LN W TRAPEZOID DR W. B R O A D W A Y W. S. EUCLID ST W. LINCOLN AVE S . M A N C H E S T E R A V E S. WALNUT STN. EUCLID STW. LINCOLN AVE W.LINCOLN AVE 1661-1673 W Broadway DEV No. 2020-00248 Subject Property APN: 250-101-09 250-101-08 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 12 C-G DEV 2020-00248 MEDICAL OFFICE RM-4 GEI LING APARTMENTS 41 DUC-G RETAIL T LOARA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C-G SERVICE STATION RM-4 HAWAIIAN APTS 30 DU C-G (MU) RETAIL RM-4 PAMPAS APARTMENTS 77 DU RM-4 PARK PLACE APTS 20 DU RM-4 PAMPAS LANE APARTMENTS 40 DUC-G CAR WASH C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-4 CHAUMONT VILLAS APARTMENTS 60 DU T NURSING HOME T NURSING HOME C-G NURSING HOME RM-4 BELAGE MANOR APARTMENTS 180 DU RM-4 LE CHATEAU APTS 77 DU C-G SERVICE STATION RM-3 Single Family Residence C-G OFFICES C-G SERVICE STATION C-G RETAIL O-L RETAIL RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL C-G RELIGIOUS USE C-G RELIGIOUS USE C-G COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY S EUCLID STW BROA DWAY W PAM PA S LN S QUADRILATERAL WAYW TRAPEZOID DR W. BROADWAY W. S. EUCLID STW. LINCOLN AVE S . M A N C H E S T E R A V E S. WALNUT STN. EUCLID STW. LINCOLN AVE W.LINCOLN AVE 1 6 6 1 -1 6 7 3 W Br o a d w a y D E V N o . 2 0 2 0 -0 0 24 8 Subject Property APN: 250-101-09 250-101-08 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to: May 20 21 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06125 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00126 LOCATION: 1100 North Tustin Avenue APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and owner is Soojae Cho of JSB Investment Group. The agent is Anthony Koo of AK DBM, Inc. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to demolish an existing 15,372 square foot two-story office building and construct an approximately 6,500 square foot drive through car wash with associated office space and sixteen self- service onsite vacuuming stations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15303 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; and adopt the attached resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125. BACKGROUND: This item was on the Planning Commission agenda for June 20, 2022; however, that meeting was cancelled due to lack of a quorum and this item was noticed again for the July 6 , 2022 meeting. The approximately 0.73-acre property is located at the northeast corner of Tustin Avenue and La Palma Avenue and is developed with a 15,372 square foot two-story office building. The project site is located in Development Area No. 1 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (SP 2015-1), and is designated for Industrial land uses in the General Plan. The project site is bordered by industrial office buildings to the north and east, a gas station and retail uses across Tustin Avenue to the west, and a bank and insurance office across La Palma Avenue to the south. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to demolish the existing office building and construct an approximately 6,500 square foot drive through car wash with associated office space located on the second floor, and sixteen self-service onsite vacuuming stations. The proposed car wash building would be located in the middle of the site with dual drive though queuing lanes located along the west property line adjacent to Tustin Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 7 Avenue. A total of 16 parking/vacuum spaces would be located along the east property line. The car wash would be accessed from an entrance only driveway from northbound Tustin Avenue where vehicles would enter the dual queuing lanes and pay stations before entering the carwash tunnel. Vehicles would exit the carwash tunnel and turn right onto the one-way drive aisle located on the east side of the property in a southerly direction. Customers would either park and use the vacuums or exit the property from an exit only driveway onto westbound La Palma Avenue. Signs indicating “Right Turn Only”, “Do Not Enter”, and “Wrong Way”, would be installed at the driveway on La Palma Avenue as well as a right turn arrow on the pavement. Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 7 In addition to the 16 parking/vacuum spaces, there would be two parking spaces and a loading space without vacuums for a total of 19 on-site parking spaces. The parking/vacuum spaces would be located under an approximate 10-foot high perforated metal canopy structure. The proposed carwash would operate between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM seven days per week. The carwash would operate with two or three employees on site during the week depending on the high demand periods. Employees would park on-site in the two designated employee parking spaces that would not contain a vacuum. When a third employee is on-site, one of the vacuum spaces would be reserved for the additional employee parking. The proposed carwash building would include the carwash tunnel, a breakroom and office, restroom, equipment rooms, and storage areas on the first floor; and an office, restroom, and storage areas on the second floor. The car wash tunnel portion of the building would be approximately 18 feet high. The second floor office area and architectural tower element would be 32 feet high. The proposed exterior building finishes would consist of contemporary stucco, glass, and metal elements and have a color palette of white, silver, crème, and red. A metal structural canopy is proposed to extend from the carwash building westerly over the two entry queuing lanes. The vacuum canopy would consist of red perforated metal with white vacuum structural beams and elements to match the building colors. A 10-foot high trash enclosure and vacuum equipment room would be located along the east property line and have the same exterior building finishes as the carwash. A 9-foot high block wall would be located along the northern property line abutting the exit to the carwash tunnel. A 7-foot high block wall would be located along the north and east property lines. Site landscaping would consist of 3,882 square feet of trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The proposed landscaping would be placed along the project frontage to the west and south property lines, and within the parking lot and along the eastern side of the project site. Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 7 LANDSCAPE PLAN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 5 of 7 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) permits a carwash use in Development Area No. 1 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. An analysis of development standards, parking, noise, and traffic/queuing is described in more detail below. Development Standards: As designed, the project complies with the applicable development standards of Development Area No. 1 of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan as illustrated in the table below. Development Standard Required/Allowed for DA1 Proposed Front Setback 15 Feet Required 15 Feet Rear Setback 0 Feet 0 Feet Side Setback 0 Feet 0 Feet Floor Area Ratio 0.50 Maximum 0.25 Structure Height 60-feet Maximum 32 feet Wall Height Same as structure height (60 ft. max) 7 feet - 9 feet Parking: The AMC does not have an established parking standard for a carwash use; rather, the AMC requires a parking demand study or a parking justification letter to be prepared. The applicant has provided a parking analysis (Attachment 5), which analyzed the parking count for four carwash facilities located in Anaheim to determine the appropriate number of parking spaces needed for the proposed use. The table below outlines the parking for the four sampled carwash facilities as well as the parking proposed for the proposed car wash: Name Location Parking Spaces Patrons Employee Total Drive Through Express Carwash 590 N Magnolia Ave 16 0 16 Anaheim Express Wash 210 N Euclid Way 19 2 21 Anaheim Express Carwash 2961 W Ball Road 26 0 26 Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 S Brookhurst St 15 0 15 Proposed Carwash 1100 N Tustin Avenue 16 2 +1 loading 19 Based on the data collected from the four similar facilities, the minimum peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking spaces was 12 and occupied employee parking spaces was two. The average peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking spaces was 15 and occupied employee Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 6 of 7 parking spaces was three. The maximum peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking spaces was 22 and occupied employee parking spaces was three. The parking analysis determined that if the proposed carwash provides at least the average peak vehicle drying/vacuuming parking spaces and employee parking spaces, that it should adequately accommodate patrons and employees at the proposed carwash facility. When all vacuum parking spaces are occupied by customers, and no vacuum spaces are available on site, patrons will leave the site via the one-way driveway without vacuuming. The proposed project will provide 16 vehicle drying/vacuuming parking spaces, two employee parking spaces and one loading stall. For drying/vacuuming parking spaces, this exceeds the minimum and average peak observed occupied parking space requirements. For employee parking spaces, this equals the minimum peak observed occupied parking space requirements. Based on this analysis, staff believes that adequate parking will be provided for the proposed carwash use. Noise: To determine potential noise impacts generated by the carwash use, the applicant has provided a Noise Impact Analysis (Attachment 6) in compliance with AMC requirements. The AMC limits noise at any point on properties to 60 decibels. The project site was analyzed for noise impacts potentially generated from the proposed carwash, dryer and vacuums. The Noise Impact Analysis determined that noise levels emanated from the property would not exceed 59.4 decibels. As previously mentioned, the proposed project includes a 9-foot high wall, which would be placed along the northern property line directly outside of the dryer tunnel to reduce the sound of the dryer, and the remainder of the property includes 7-foot high walls along the northern and the eastern property line. The proposed walls would minimize blower and vacuum station noise levels to 60 decibels or less at the adjacent property lines. The Noise Impact Analysis concludes that with the wall design proposed for the project would comply with AMC noise attenuation standards. Traffic/Queuing: The applicant has provided a Trip Generation (Attachment 7) and Queuing Analysis (Attachment 8) which analyzed the potential traffic impacts and on-site circulation for the carwash use. Based on the trip generation comparison to existing use, the proposed development is projected to generate 15 new trips during the morning peak hour and 51 new trips during the evening peak hour. The Trip Generation Analysis concluded that no further traffic analysis is required based on the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. The carwash queuing lanes can accommodate 13 vehicles to queue on site. Based on field surveys conducted from four separate carwash facilities located in the City of Anaheim, the Queuing Analysis concluded that an average of six vehicles were in the queuing lanes during the weekday observation period and an average of eight vehicles were observed in the queuing lane during the weekend observation period. The project could accommodate 13 vehicles in the queuing lanes, which was more than the average number of vehicles waiting in the queuing lane(s) for the observed car wash facilities during the weekdays and weekends. In the event that the vehicle queue reaches the public right-of-way on Tustin Avenue, the site operator would need to make necessary arrangements for staff to position at the end of the on-site queue near the project entrance to direct traffic. This measure shall be implemented for a short timeframe, as needed, until the queue dissipates. This requirement is included in the proposed conditions of approval in the resolution. Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 July 6, 2022 Page 7 of 7 Environmental Impact Analysis: The Project qualifies for a Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15303 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387). Class 3 consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies for up to four commercial buildings that comprise a total of 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is for a 6,500 square foot express carwash. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and as further described in this staff report, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that, as designed and with the proposed conditions, the carwash use would be developed and operated in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed project would be consistent with the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Development Area 1, zoning for the property, and the project would be designed to ensure that the vehicle circulation, parking, and noise generated by the carwash operations would not impact surrounding properties. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the conditional use permit request for the new carwash facility. Prepared by, Submitted by, Elizabeth Yee Scott Koehm, AICP Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Project Plans 3. Letter of Request 4. Letter of Justification 5. Parking Analysis 6. Noise Study 7. Trip Generation 8. Queuing Analysis 9. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -1- PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06125 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2021-00126) (1100 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 to construct a new express carwash facility (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") on that certain real property located at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), pursuant to Section 18.60.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, the 0.73-acre Property is currently developed with 15,372 square foot two- story office building located within the “SP2015-1” Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan zone in Development Area 1 (DA1), and is designated for Industrial land uses in the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 3 consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies for up to four commercial buildings that comprise a total of 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is for a 6,500 square foot express carwash. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and as further described in this staff report, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within Development Area 1 (DA1) of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (SP2015-1), zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.120.040 (Uses) of Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (SP 2015-1) 2. The Proposed Project would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area because the project would comply with the applicable development, landscaping, and parking standards and through the incorporation of the proposed 9-foot block wall, would reduce noise generated by the carwash tunnel to a noise level that meets Code requirements and would not significantly affect the neighboring industrial properties. The design of the Proposed Project would also be compatible with the primarily industrial designated properties, which border the site through the incorporation of contemporary metal, glass, and stucco design elements and would not have an adverse effect on adjacent properties. 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area nor to the health and safety of the public because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets. Further, the Proposed Project will incorporate operational methods that will provide adequate on-site parking, queuing, and traffic flows to reduce any potential impacts. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the Proposed Project would significantly improve the overall appearance of the project site, and is compatible with the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the conditions contained herein; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2021-06125 at the Property, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this - 3 - PC2022-*** reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6 , 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “A” (DEV2021-00126) - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2021-06125 (DEV2021-00126) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Water Engineering PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 2 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 3 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 4 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works, Development Services 5 Submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the storm water runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined Public Works, Development Services - 7 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT BMPs. Submit PDF via GoPost and a plan checking deposit to the Public Works/Development Services for consideration and approval. 6 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Works, Development Services PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY) sign, R5-1(DO NOT ENTER) sign, R5-1a (WRONG WAY) sign, and right-turn arrow pavement legend at the exit-only driveway. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 8 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, street improvement plans shall be submitted showing R6-1(R) (ONE-WAY) sign on the median directly in front of the exit-only driveway for review and approval. Sign shall be installed prior to the first building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 9 The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the right-of-way easements described below: • 1 foot in width on Tustin Ave • 7 feet in width on La Palma Ave • Corner cut on Tustin Ave and La Palma Ave Public Works, Development Services 10 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 11 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 12 Design per City Standards full improvements for all impacted and interior streets/facilities in accordance with City Code, Standards and Specifications. Such improvements may include, but not be limited to the following: all driveways shall comply with standard 115-B Public Works, Development Services 13 The legal owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Development Services Division. The Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works, Development Services - 8 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 14 Submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works, Development Services 15 Water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 16 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 17 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 18 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 19 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic aboveground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 9 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT the repair, replacement, and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. 20 The car wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions. Public Utilities, Water Engineering PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 21 All public improvements shall be constructed by the developer, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Public Works, Development Services 22 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services 23 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works, Development Services 24 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 25 Ongoing during project operation, should the vehicle queue reach the public right-of-way on Tustin Avenue, staff members shall be positioned at the end of the on-site queue near the project entrance to direct traffic. This measure shall be implemented as needed, until the queue dissipates. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 26 Ongoing during project operation, vehicle deliveries including loading and unloading shall be performed on site during non- business hours. Delivery vehicles shall not block any park of the public right of way. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 27 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 10 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. GENERAL CONDITIONS 28 Vehicle gates shall not be installed across the project driveways or access roads without providing a vehicle turnaround area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 29 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals • 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities, including storm drains, gas, and electric • 6-feet minimum separation from curb face • 10-feet minimum separation from structures, footings, and trees. The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, storm water BMPs, power poles, streetlights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 30 No public water mains or laterals allowed under driveways, parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities Water Engineering 31 This project shall require a fire sprinkler system (NFPA 13). This building exceeds the 5,000 sf threshold to provide fire sprinklers to new buildings per AFD municipal code amendment. Please contact water engineering to get further information regarding public works requirements for backflow, tapping into existing city main. Fire Department - 11 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 32 All CBC and CFC requirements shall be followed for permit issuance. Any fire permits shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Department 33 Hours of Operation for the carwash facility shall be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. seven days a week. Any changes to the facility’s hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 34 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 35 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 36 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 37 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the Planning and Building, - 12 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Services Division : 1100 N. Tustin Ave. Anaheim, CA 92807 : ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS------2019 TILE 24APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES : EXPRESS CAR WASH WITH SELF VACUUM STATIONS BUILDING ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION CBC/CPC/CEC/CMC/CFC/CGBSC ----------2019 : DA 2 (INDUSTRIAL)ZONING : B (EXPRESS CAR WAHS)OCCUPANCY GROUP : REQUIRED (THE BUILDING IS OVER 5,000 SF.) SPRINKLER : 0.5 ( Buildable area-12,808 Sq.ft.)FAR Anaheim Express Carwash 1100 N.Tustin Ave. Anaheim, CA 92807 : TWO STORY / 35' MAXSTORIES / BUILDING HEIGHT : II - B CONSTRUCTION TYPE N N AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807: 60'HEIGHT LIMITTUNNELOFFICE&UTILITY4,050 sq.ft.VACUUM RM. 276 sq.ft. TRASH ENCLOSURE: 180 sq.ft. UTILITY 494 sq.ft. OFFICE/STORAGE 1,245 sq.ft. PATIO 328 sq.ft. STAIR 155 sq.ft. 2ND FLOOR: 1,728 sq.ft. 1ST FLOOR: 5,000 sq.ft. LOT AREA 27,616 sq.ft LOT AREA 27,616 sq.ft Project Site 1100 N. Tustin Ave. **GROSS AREA: 6,728 sq.ft. NET AREA: g-01 COVER G - 01 COVER PAGE G - 02 RENDERING G - 03 SITE PHOTOGRAPHIC V - 01 TOPO / UTILITY SURVEY C - 1 GRADING / DRAINAGE PLAN C - 2 BMP PLAN C - 3 DETAIL L - 1 PLANTING PLAN L - 2 TREE REMOVE SCHEDULE L - 3 WATER USE PLAN L - 4 PARKING AREA CALCULATION A - 01 SITE PLAN A - 02 CIRCULATION PLAN A - 03 FLOOR PLAN A - 04 ROOF EQUIPMENT PLAN / SECTION A - 05 ELEVATION A - 06 MATERIAL BOARD SU SITE PLAN CUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 C - 3 DETAIL 4 259.5 sq.ft.3,378.5 sq.ft.590.5 sq.ft.1,017 sq.ft. 4,504.5 sq.ft.1,500 sq.ft. 6,004.5 sq.ft. 5,521.5 sq.ft. ( EXCLUDE STAIR & PATIO/ 483 sq.ft.) JANITOR 1 22 22 18 18 24A 25 2625 6 4 27 21 7 7 16 2 14 14 12 12 12 ENTER 3 1319 15 15 5 8 9 11A 32 29 25 25 11B 11D 29 17 23B 23A 23C 33 3310'8' EXIT ONLYENTER ONLYTRASH ENCLOSURE REST.RM. RIGHT TURN ONLY M M (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B TRASH TRUCK ACCESS AND TURNING CLEARANCE. (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B 5' RADIUS AT DRIVEWAY. DEVIATION REQURIED. POC. (IRRIGATION WATER METER /2") (E)2" lateral and water main off La Palma Ave. Service will be abandoned per City Standards.ADAEMPLOYEELOADINGEVCLEANAIR EVADA12 12 VCC.01VCC.02VCC.03VCC.04VCC.05VCC.07VCC.08VCC.09VCC.10VCC.11VCC.12VCC.13VCC.14VCC.15VCC.1601VACUUM. RM.OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMPOC. (DOMESTIC WATER METER /2") POC. (FIRE SERVICE WATER ) *REUSE (E) 2" SERVICE OFF TUSTIN AVE.VCC.06CLEANAIRCLEANAIRPROPOSED 2-STORY EXPRESS CARWASH BLDG.EMPLOYEE02POC. (SEWER /6")Q-01Q-02Q-03Q-04Q-05Q-06Q-07Q-08Q-09Q-1 0 Q-11 Q-12Q-1320 21 11D 11D 20 **Electrical transformers, backflow prevention devices, and double check detector assemblies shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line, except in single-family zones, and shall be screened with live landscaping if located within a required structural setback area abutting any public or private street. The landscaping must fully screen the equipment within one year of planting and shall be fully maintained at all times. 18.38.160.030 EX 10" V.C.P. EX 10" WATER CROSSWALK CROSSWALKBUS STOP (E)EDISON VOLT 24B 24C LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUE(N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE R6-1(R) / ONE WAY AT MEDIAN R5-1A WRONG WAY R3-5(R) RIGHT TURN ONLY (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B ATTACHMENT NO. 2 AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807VIEW-B VIEW-A VIEW-C VIEW-A VIEW-BVIEW-C CUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 g-02 RENDER- ING g-02 RENDER- ING VIEW REGEND AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807V.1 V.2 V . 3V.4V.5V.1 V.4V.3 V.5 V.2 G-03 SITE PHOTOCUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807V-01 SURVEYN 89° 52' 30" W 145.95'N 87° 43' 30" W 120.85'N 02° 16' 30" E 163.70'N 02° 16' 30" E 194.18'N 42° 43' 30" W 35.36'N 87° 43' 30" W 500.00'LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN STREETN 02° 16' 30" E 386.72'72'65'P.P.P.P.F.H.CLCLPARCEL 1RS MAP 68 - 24244.0 FFPOINT ENGINEERING. 10201 RESEDA BLVD #116 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 TEL. 213-258-84511100 N TUSTIN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92807 PROJECT TITLE SHEET TITLE PROJECT ADDRESS REVISIONS BYDATE TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW TH08/09 MAY 20, 2021 DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: BENCH MARK ELEVATION: 241.32' BENCH MARK: 2A-88 (CITY OF ANAHEIM) DATUM: NAVD 1988 BRASS CAP MKD C OF A BM IN, THE TOP OF CURB AT THE NE BCR. GRAPHIC SCALE 05'10'30' SCALE 1" = 10' T-BUR T-BUR W CUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 811 GRAPHIC SCALE 05'10'30' SCALE 1" = 10' LEGEND ;N 88° 40' 39" W 500.00'LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUE N 1° 19' 21" E 386.72'ADAADAW W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W S SSSSSSSSSSCONSTRUCTION NOTES ; 1 2 3 4 5 9 6 7 8 10 DRAINAGE PIPE 1-6" P.V.C. SCH40. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB WALL PER DETAIL 1 / C-3 DRAINAGE 12" W PARKWAY DRAIN PER CITY STD. PLAN 151-1 CURB DRAIN PER CITY STD. PLAN 151-1 GRADE BREAK CONSTRUCT TRENCH DRAIN W / FLO-GARD FF-TDPC 600 PER DETAIL 2 / C-3 SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED CONSTRUCT 24" S.Q.CATCH BASIN W/ TRAFFIC GRATE5'-6" D.P.PER DETAIL 6 / C-3 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL, PARKING, AND DETAIL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN 13 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 NEW LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPING PLAN CONSTRUCT 24" W V-GUTTER PER DETAIL 3 / C-3 CONSTRUCT FENCE WALL PER STRUCTURAL PLAN 19 20 CONSTRUCT 4' DEPTH INFILTRATION BASIN PER DETAIL 7 / C-3 DISTRIBUTION PIPE, 12" DIA PERFORATED PVC SCHEDULE 40 PAY STATION PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CONSTRUCT WHEEL STOPS FOR 18' LONG PARKING SPACES. CONSTRUCT 4" THK ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH 4" CLASS II BASE PER DETAIL 5 / C-3 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO REMOVE CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. PLAN 115-B GRADING / DRAINAGE PLANC-1 SCALE; 1" = 10'-0"WWWWWW21 22 4" D.I. FOR FIRE WATER LINE W/ MECHANICAL CONNECTION EXISTING 2" D.I. TO REMAIN FOR IRRIGATION WATER LINE FOR CITY STD. HOT TAP 2" D.I. FOR DOMESTIC WATER LINE PER CITY STD, 24.0'W, 10' CURB RADIUS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN 23 CONSTRUCT 12" S.Q.CATCH BASIN W/ FGP12F8 FILTER W/ NON-TRAFFIC GRATE12" D.P.PER DETAIL 6 / C-3 INSTALL CARTRIDGE MEDIA FILTERS , FLO-GARD PERKFILTER, 8' WIDE CONCRETE VAULT, 33-18" CARTRIDGE DETAIL 1 / C-4 24 INSTALL RECLAIMED WATER TANK (AWWA STANDARD C111) PER CITY STD. 25 ABANDON EXISTING WATER SERVICE LINE AND METER 26 INSTALL BACK-FLOW PREVENTION PER CITY STD. 27 INSTALL 6" SEWER LATERAL LINE PER CITY STD. 222-1 28 INSTALL FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION PER CITY STD. REVISIONS ELEVATION: 241.32' BENCH MARK: 2A-88 (CITY OF ANAHEIM) DATUM: NAVD 1988 BRASS CAP MKD C OF A BM IN, THE TOP OF CURB AT THE NE BCR. 1100 N TUSTIN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92807 1" = 10'F.S.E.K. 41POINT ENGINEERING, INC. 9227 RESEDA BLVD #111 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 TEL. 213-258-8451 No 67288 9/30/22ExpHOSANGKI M CIV I L FORPDERETSIGE RS T ATE REENIGNELA NOISSE OFCAL I F O R N IAC-1 N 88° 40' 39" W 500.00'LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUE N 1° 19' 21" E 386.72'ADAADAGRAPHIC SCALE 05'10'30' SCALE 1" = 10' BMP PLANC-2 SCALE; 1" = 10'-0" BMP SUMMARY TABLE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ; 1 2 3 4 5 9 6 7 8 10 DRAINAGE PIPE 1-6" P.V.C. SCH40. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB WALL PER DETAIL 1 / C-3 DRAINAGE 12" W PARKWAY DRAIN PER CITY STD. PLAN 151-1 CURB DRAIN PER CITY STD. PLAN 151-1 GRADE BREAK CONSTRUCT TRENCH DRAIN W / FLO-GARD FF-TDPC 600 PER DETAIL 2 / C-3 SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED CONSTRUCT 24" S.Q.CATCH BASIN W/ TRAFFIC GRATE5'-6" D.P.PER DETAIL 6 / C-3 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL, PARKING, AND DETAIL PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN 13 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 NEW LANDSCAPING PER LANDSCAPING PLAN CONSTRUCT 24" W V-GUTTER PER DETAIL 3 / C-3 CONSTRUCT FENCE WALL PER STRUCTURAL PLAN 19 CONSTRUCT 4' DEPTH INFILTRATION BASIN PER DETAIL 7 / C-3 DISTRIBUTION PIPE, 12" DIA PERFORATED PVC SCHEDULE 40 PAY STATION PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CONSTRUCT WHEEL STOPS FOR 18' LONG PARKING SPACES. CONSTRUCT 4" THK ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH 4" CLASS II BASE PER DETAIL 5 / C-3 EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO REMOVE CONSTRUCT NEW DRIVEWAY PER CITY STD. PLAN 115-B 24.0'W, 10' CURB RADIUS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN CONSTRUCT 12" S.Q.CATCH BASIN W/ FGP12F8 FILTER W/ NON-TRAFFIC GRATE12" D.P.PER DETAIL 6 / C-3 23 INSTALL CARTRIDGE MEDIA FILTERS , FLO-GARD PERKFILTER, 8' WIDE CONCRETE VAULT, 33-18" CARTRIDGE DETAIL 1 / C-4 REVISIONS ELEVATION: 241.32' BENCH MARK: 2A-88 (CITY OF ANAHEIM) DATUM: NAVD 1988 BRASS CAP MKD C OF A BM IN, THE TOP OF CURB AT THE NE BCR. 1100 N TUSTIN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92807 1" = 10'F.S.E.K. 42POINT ENGINEERING, INC. 9227 RESEDA BLVD #111 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 TEL. 213-258-8451 No 67288 9/30/22ExpHOSANGKI M CIV I L FORPDERETSIGE RS T ATE REENIGNELA NOISSE OFCAL I F O R N IAC-2 C-3 INFILTRATION BASIN NOT TO SCALE 7 NOTES: 12" PERORATED PIPE PROVIDE END CAP ON ALL PIPE END TO AVOID ROCKS 2 1/2" WASHED GRAVEL GETTING INTO THE PIPE (ASTM #2 AGGREGATE) NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEE NOTE 1 HEREON C-3 CONCRETE CURB WALL NOT TO SCALE 1 NOTE ; 1. PROVIDE TOOLED SCORE LINES EVENLY SPACED THROUGHOUT CURB NOT TO EXCEED 20' O.C.. PROVIDE TOOLED SCORE LINES AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURVED SECTIONS. 2. FINISH CURBS WITH A STEEL TOWLED FINISH ON ALL EXPOSED SURFACES. 3 WHEN CONC. CURB IS INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EXISTING A.C. PAVING, THE EXISTING A.C. PAVING SHALL BE SAWCUT 12" FROM EDGE OF CONC. AND NEW ASPHALT CONCRETE PLACED AFTER CURB IS IN PLACE. 4" REBAR @ 18" O.C.HORIZONTAL 4" REBAR @ 18" O.C.VERTICAL, TIE TO HORIZ.REBAR (MIN 3) FINISH GRADE VARIES COMPACTED SUBGRADE ORUNDISTURBED NATURAL GRADE CURB WALL SCHEDULE C F 0" TO 6" 6" 6" TO 1' 1' 1' TO 1'6" 1'-6" 1'6" TO 2' 2' ELEV - 232.10GRATE & FRAME 4" P.V.C. PLAN SECTION OUTLET PIPESEE PLAN SCREEN C-3 TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 NOTES: 1. 1. Flo-gard TM trench drain filter insert for flat grated inlet model #FF-TDPC600. CLR1 1/2"4" THK. CONCRETE SIDEWALK #4@16" O.C.EW TYP.SCARIFY AND RECOMPACTTOP 12" OF SUBGRADE TO95% RELATIVE COMPACTION 1/4"R EDGE SIDETURF WHEREOCCURS NOTES; 1. PROVIDE EDGED CONTROL JOINTS @ 10' O.C. & EDGED EXPANSION JOINTS @ 30' O.C. SEE PLANS FOR SIDEWALK WIDTHS. 2. PAVING SHALL HAVE A MEDIUM SALT (MEDIUM BROOM) FINISH ON ALL SURFACES LESS THAN 6% AND A SLIP RESISTANT (HEAVY BROOM) FINISH ON ALL SURFACES GREATER THAN 6%. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING FOR PATTERN, COLOR AND TEXTURE. 3. CONCRETE, fc'=2500 psi @ 28 DAYS PER SSPWC. 4. CONTROL JOINT SHALL BE ON EVERY 15' SPACING MAX. EACH WAY FOR PVC PIPE SEE NOTE 3 BELOWDRAINAGE STRUCTURE ADAPTER LAP HOOP MINIMUM OF 12". TIE TO #4 REBAR#4 REBAR HORIZONTAL HOOP AT 12" O.C., VERT AT MAXIMUM OF 12" O.C. SIZE AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN.TOP OF PVC DRAINAGE PIPE, RELATIVE COMPACTION.COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 90% WITH TRAFFIC GRATE INSTALL 24" SQUARE CB MFD. BY ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY (626) 289-4294 TYPICAL AT PERIMETER. 1/4" WASH AT TOP RIM, 1/2" TOOLED RADIUS ALL AROUND. CONCRETE OR ASPHALTPAVINGWHEN INDICATED ON PLAN. NOTES; 1. PIPE TO CONVEY RUNOFF TO EXISTING OR NEW STORM DRAIN, SWALE OR OTHER OUTLET AS INDICATED ON PLAN. 2. TOP OF GRATE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS SHALL BE AS PER INDICATED ON PLAN. 3. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ADAPTER AS MANUFACTURED BY GPK PRODUCT, INC., SUPPLIER: STAR PIPE, RIVERSIDE, CA (909) 248-1281 4. SET TOP OF PIPE AT MIN OF 6" BELOW BOTTOM OF CATCH BASIN INSERT. 5. INSTALL FRAME MOUNT SEDIMENT LINER AND FILTER MEDIUM IN CATCH BASIN. FLOGARD+PLUS TM FILTER INSERT FOR FLAT GRATED INLET MODEL #FGP-24F8 BY KRISTAR ENTERPRISES, INC. (800) 579-8819, OR APPROVED EQUAL. FILTER INSERTCATCH BASIN SEE NOTE 4 C-3 CATCH BASIN DETAIL6 CL 1/2" TOOLED RADIUS, TYPICAL FLOWLINE. ELEVATIONS AS INDICATED ON PLAN,AT CENTER LINE. CONCRETE SWALE,REINFORCE WITH 2-#4 REBAR 10 X 10 X 6" X 6" W.W.M. NOTE 1. FINISH SWALE WITH A FINE HAIR BROOM PERPENDICULAR TO THE RUN OF THE SWALE EXCEPT FOR 1 1/2" EACH SIDE OF THE FLOWLINE WHICH SHALL BE A STEEL TROWL FINISH. 2. PLACE TOOLED SCORELINES MINIMUM OF 3/4" DEEP OR PLASTIC CONTROL JOINTS AT 10' ON CENTER. LAY OUT CONTROL JOINT C-3 CONCRETE SWALE NOT TO SCALE 3 C-3 CON'C PAVEMENT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4 JET SEAL 2-2" LIFTS OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE SCORE CURB PER N.T.C. @ 5' O.C. INSTALL EDGE RESTRAINT TYP. FOR ALL EDGES : CLASS II BASE SUB GRADE - COMPACT TO MINIMUM90% RELATIVE COMPACTION (RET. WALL, MOW STRIP, IF NONE SPEC"D,CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL PLASTIC HEADER) 4X4 CROSS-SECTION C-3 ASPHALT PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 5 2 1/2" WASHED GRAVEL (ASTM #2 AGGREGATE) 4" THK ASPHALT PAVEMENT 12" PERFORATED PIPE @ 2.5' O.C. NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SEE NOTE 1 HEREON REVISIONS ELEVATION: 241.32' BENCH MARK: 2A-88 (CITY OF ANAHEIM) DATUM: NAVD 1988 BRASS CAP MKD C OF A BM IN, THE TOP OF CURB AT THE NE BCR. 1100 N TUSTIN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92807 1" = 10'F.S.E.K. 43POINT ENGINEERING, INC. 9227 RESEDA BLVD #111 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 TEL. 213-258-8451 No 67288 9/30/22ExpHOSANGKI M CIV I L FORPDERETSIGE RS T ATE REENIGNELA NOISSE OFCAL I F O R N IAC-3 REVISIONS ELEVATION: 241.32' BENCH MARK: 2A-88 (CITY OF ANAHEIM) DATUM: NAVD 1988 BRASS CAP MKD C OF A BM IN, THE TOP OF CURB AT THE NE BCR. 1100 N TUSTIN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92807 1" = 10'F.S.E.K. 44POINT ENGINEERING, INC. 9227 RESEDA BLVD #111 NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324 TEL. 213-258-8451 No 67288 9/30/22ExpHOSANGKI M CIV I L FORPDERETSIGE RS T ATE REENIGNELA NOISSE OFCAL I F O R N IAC-4 OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMVACUUM.RM.REST.RM.TRASHENCLOSUREVENDING JANITORREST.RM.ENTERTRASH TRUCK ACCESSAND TURNINGCLEARANCE. EMPLOYEELA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN STREET20'-0"TYPICALTREE SPACING IRRIGATION BACKFLOW DEVICE;12"x30"x24"h ENCLOSURE CAGEFIRE BACKFLOW DEVICE;POTABLE BACKFLOW DEVICE;IRRIGATION WATER METERPOTABLEWATER METER20'-0" TYPICAL TREESPACINGSTABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITEMAINTENANCE STRIP2'-0"POWER TRANSFORMERFDCN330 Arden Avenue, Ste 130Glendale, CA 91203323-491-3808PLANTINGPLANAK.DBM 1100 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92807L-1 PLANTINGDETAILSAK.DBM 1100 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92807330 Arden Avenue, Ste 130Glendale, CA 91203323-491-3808L-2N 89° 52' 30" W 145.95'N 87° 43' 30" W 120.85'N 02° 16' 30" E 163.70' N 02° 16' 30" E 194.18'N 42° 43' 30" W 35.36'N 87° 43' 30" W 500.00'LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN STREETN 02° 16' 30" E 386.72'72'65'P.P.P.P.CLCL DEMO.TYPE V-N12,500 sq.ftOFFICE BUILDING(E) QUEEN PALMTO BE REMOVED(E) QUEEN PALMTO BE REMOVED(E) QUEEN PALMTO BE REMOVED(E) QUEEN PALMTO BE REMOVEDTREE REMOVE SCHEDULENSCALE: 1 / 16" = 1'-0"1 OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMVACUUM.RM.REST.RM.TRASHENCLOSUREVENDING JANITORREST.RM.ENTERTRASH TRUCK ACCESSAND TURNINGCLEARANCE. EMPLOYEELA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN STREETN330 Arden Avenue, Ste 130Glendale, CA 91203323-491-3808WATER USEPLANL-3AK.DBM 1100 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92807 PRELIMINARY WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE WORKSHEET #1 - LOW .2 DRIP.77 0.26 3,080.9 800.2 24,410.3 #2 - MOD.5 BUBBLER .77 0.65 801.7 520.6 15,879.9x0.34 3,882.6 1,320.83,882.61,320.840,290.2 GAL53,295.7 GALMAWA = (ETo)(0.62)[(ETAFxLA)+((1-ETAF)xSLA)]ETo = 49.2ETAF = .45LA = 3,882.61100 N. TUSTIN AVENUE, ANAHEIMJeffrey W. Maxwell, RLA3/10/20225774330 Arden Avenue, Ste 130 Glendale, CA 91203323-491-3808jeff@jmd-la.com3/10/2022 OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMVACUUM.RM.REST.RM.TRASHENCLOSUREVENDING JANITORREST.RM.ENTERTRASH TRUCK ACCESSAND TURNINGCLEARANCE. EMPLOYEELA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN STREETN330 Arden Avenue, Ste 130Glendale, CA 91203323-491-3808PARKING LOTDIAGRAML-4AK.DBM 1100 N. TUSTIN AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92807 JANITOR 1 22 22 18 18 24A 25 2625 6 4 27 21 7 7 16 2 14 14 12 12 12 ENTER 3 1319 15 15 5 8 9 11A 32 29 25 25 11B 11D 29 17 23B 23A 23C 33 3310'8' EXIT ONLYENTER ONLYTRASH ENCLOSURE REST.RM. RIGHT TURN ONLY M M (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B TRASH TRUCK ACCESS AND TURNING CLEARANCE. (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B 5' RADIUS AT DRIVEWAY. DEVIATION REQURIED. POC. (IRRIGATION WATER METER /2") (E)2" lateral and water main off La Palma Ave. Service will be abandoned per City Standards. ADAEMPLOYEELOADINGEVCLEANAIR EVADA12 12 VCC.01VCC.02VCC.03VCC.04VCC.05VCC.07VCC.08VCC.09VCC.10VCC.11VCC.12VCC.13VCC.14VCC.15VCC.1601VACUUM. RM.OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMPOC. (DOMESTIC WATER METER /2") POC. (FIRE SERVICE WATER ) *REUSE (E) 2" SERVICE OFF TUSTIN AVE.VCC.06CLEANAIRCLEANAIRPROPOSED 2-STORY EXPRESS CARWASH BLDG.EMPLOYEE02POC. (SEWER /6")Q-01Q-02Q-03Q-04Q-05Q-06Q-07Q-08Q-09Q- 1 0 Q-11 Q-12Q-1320 21 11D 11D 20 **Electrical transformers, backflow prevention devices, and double check detector assemblies shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the property line, except in single-family zones, and shall be screened with live landscaping if located within a required structural setback area abutting any public or private street. The landscaping must fully screen the equipment within one year of planting and shall be fully maintained at all times. 18.38.160.030 EX 10" V.C.P. EX 10" WATER CROSSWALK CROSSWALKBUS STOP (E)EDISON VOLT 24B 24C LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUE(N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE R6-1(R) / ONE WAY AT MEDIAN R5-1A WRONG WAY R3-5(R) RIGHT TURN ONLY (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B 1 TRASH ENCLOSURE / PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STANDARD 2 TRASH TRUCK ACCESS 4 3 PATH OF TRAVEL TO TRASH ENCLOSURE 5 EMPLOYEE PARKING / MAX. 2 EMPLOYERS PER SHIFT KEY NOTE 6 TRANS FORMER PAD (8' x 10') 7 SECURITY CAMERA 8 REST. ROOM /ADA 9 VENDING MACHINES 10 CAR WASH TUNNEL SEE THROUGH WINDOW 11A ADA PARKING W/ VAN ACCESS 12 PARKING LIGHT POST 13 LANDSCAPE SET BACK (15') 14 PATH OF TRAVEL/ PEDESTRIAN ACCEDSS 15 POWER POLE 16 PAY STATION WITH CANOPY 17 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (SEPARATE PERMIT) BOLLARD 11B 11C 11D ADA EV. PARKING W/ VAN ACCESS EV. PARKING CLEAN AIR VEHICLE 18 FIRE HYDRANT (FIRE FLOW TEST REQUIRED) 19 20 ROLL UP GATE 21 WALL PACK LIGHT 22 TRENCH DRAIN 23A BACK-FLOW PREVENTION (DOMESTIC) 24A (N)WATER METER (DOMESTIC) 25 PROPERTY WALL - 7' HEIGHT 26 PROPERTY WALL - 9' HEIGHT 27 STRIP ON PAVING 28 PAY-STATION: PAD, KIOSK, ARM GATE 29 30 TRIANGULAR CLEAR ZONE: 7' x 50' GATE: REMAIN OPEN DURING THE BUSINESS HOUR STRUCTURAL COLUMN 31 RECLAIMED WATER TANK DETECTABLE WARNING TRUNCATE DOMES32 23B BACK-FLOW PREVENTION (IRRIGATION) 23C BACK-FLOW PREVENTION (FIRE SERVICE) 24B (E)WATER METER (IRRIGATION) TRAFFIC SGINAL33 24C (N)FIRE SERVICE WATER CONNECTION HATCH LEGEND PATH OF TRAVEL LAND SCAPE TRIANGULAR VISION CLEARANCE ZONE AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807SITE PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 16" = 1'-0"1 A-01 SITE PLANCUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 JANITORENTER10'8' TRASH ENCLOSURE REST.RM. LOADING VACUUM. RM.OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMPROPOSED 2-STORY EXPRESS CARWASH BLDG.LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUEFIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUS FIRE APPARATUSFIREAPPARATUSFIREAPPARATUSFIREAPPARATUS(N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE JANITORENTER10'8' EXIT ONLYENTER ONLYTRASH ENCLOSURE REST.RM. RIGHT TURN ONLY TRASH TRUCK ACCESS AND TURNING CLEARANCE. (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B 5' RADIUS AT DRIVEWAY. DEVIATION REQURIED. ADAEMPLOYEELOADINGEVCLEANAIR EVADAVCC.01VCC.02VCC.03VCC.04VCC.05VCC.07VCC.08VCC.09VCC.10VCC.11VCC.12VCC.13VCC.14VCC.15VCC.1601QUEUING - AVCC.06CLEANAIRCLEANAIRPROPOSED 2-STORY EXPRESS CARWASH BLDG.EMPLOYEE02CROSSWALK CROSSWALKBUS STOP QUEUING - BQUEUING - CR6-1(R) / ONE WAY AT MEDIAN R5-1A WRONG WAY R3-5(R) RIGHT TURN ONLY R5-1 DO NOT ENTER TRAFFIC SIGNAL TRAFIC SIGNAL LA PALMA AVENUETUSTIN AVENUE(N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINE (N) PROPERTY LINE (E) PROPERTY LINEQ-01Q-02Q-05Q-06Q-07Q-08Q-09Q- 1 0 Q-11 Q-12Q-13(N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B (N) DRIVEWAY PER STANDARD 115-B QUEUING - A : 93'-0" QUEUING - B : 93'-0" QUEUING - C : 110'-0" TOTAL LENGTH: 296'- 0" QUEUING LANE SUMMARY TOTAL QUEUING: 296'/20' = 14.8' 13 SUITABLE QUEUING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE.AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 16" = 1'-0"1 CIRCULATION PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 16" = 1'-0"2 A-02 CIRCULA- TIONCUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 OFFICE MECHANICAL RM. STORAGE CONTROL. RM. ELEC. RM WASHING TUNNELJANITOR REST.RM. F.D. F.D. F.D. 123456 A B C E F G H1 H2 D OFFICE STORAGE PATIO HALLWAYSTORAGE F.D. F.D. NONE ACCESSIBLY ROOF 12345 A B C E F G D 6 H1 H2 AK.DBM828 W. Florida AVE.City of Hemet, CA 92543GROUND FLOOR PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"1 2ND FLOOR PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"2 A-03 FLOOR PLANCUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 HVAC. EQUIPMENT ROOF EQUIPMENT SCREEN WALL 8' HEIGHT FROM THE ROOF LEVEL ROOF ACCESS LADDER. PATIO PAY STATION CANOPY NONE ACCESSIBLY ROOF NONE ACCESSIBLY ROOFNONE ACCESSIBLY ROOF PARAPET 30" HEIGHT PARAPET 30" HEIGHT ROOF - Bh = 22'-6"AREA : 436 SQFT. ROOF - Ch = 15'-6"AREA : 1,944 SQFT. ROOF - Dh = 15'-6"AREA : 570 SQFT. ROOF - Ah = 24'-6"AREA : 542 SQFT. ROOF - Eh = 13'-0"AREA : 667 SQFT. 12345 A B C E F G D 6 H1 H2 OFFICEMECHANICALRM.STORAGECONTROL.RM.ELEC.RMOFFICESTORAGEBATH RM.ABFEDCCAR WASH TUNNELSTORAGEHALLWAY TRENCHAB FEDCCAR WASH TUNNELOFFICE REST.RM. PATIO OFFICE PAY STATION TRENCH 123456 AK.DBM828 W. Florida AVE.City of Hemet, CA 92543ROOF EQUIPMENT PLAN NSCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"1 SECTION_03 SCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"3 SECTION_02 SCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"2 SECTION_04 SCALE: 1 / 8" = 1'-0"4 A-04 ROOF PLANCUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 9280718'-0"69'-4" 41'-2"32'-0"12'-0"14 10 16 09 07 08 06 09 08 65'-8" ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING EAST ELEVATION13'-0"10'-0"17'-4" 38'-0" 26'-2" 07 08 0603 02 05 13 02 12 SOUTH ELEVATION18'-0"73'-5" 44'-3"32'-0"05 08 07 08 09 10 07 09 13'-0"25'-10" 12 14 63'-10" 43'-0"02 02 43'-0" WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 02 03 037'0"12'0"32'-0"13'-0"10'-0"18'-0"18'-4" 38'-2"11'-6"38'-2" 27'-7" 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 07 08 09 13 17'-4" 08 02 CUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 A -05 ELEV. TRASH ENCLOSURE 01 ROLL UP GATE 02 03 PAY STATION CANOPY 04 05 VACUUM CANOPY 06 PATIO GUARD RAIL 07 STUCCO - 01 08 STUCCO - 02 09 STUCCO - 03 10 POLL LIGHT 11 12 TRASH ENCLOSURE 13 PROPERTY WALL ( 7' HEIGHT ) 14 PROPERTY WALL ( 9' HEIGHT ) FUTURE SIGNAGE VACUUM ROOM NOT USE VIEW FROM WEST VIEW FROM SOUTH AK.DBM1100 N. TUSTIN AVE.Anaheim, CA 92807WINDOW MULLION ( MT_04 ) PT_01 PT_01 PT_03 PT_02 MT_00 PT_03 PT_02 PT_02 PT_03 MT_01 PT_03PT_01 PT_01 PT_02 MT_01 MT_01 MT_01 PT_03 MT_04 MT_04 MT_03MT_03 PT_02 PT_02 PT_03 PT_02 PT_03 PT_01 PT_02 PT_03 MT_00 PT_02 MT_04 MT_04 ANTI-GRAFFITI COATING PT_01 PT_01 PT_03 MT_04 PT_02 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION CUP REVIEW_INITIAL SUBMITTAL 10/12/2021CUP REVIEW_1ST REVISION 12/21/2021 CUP REVIEW_2ND REVISION 03/15/2022 03/15/2022 MT_03 EXTERIAIOR BUILDING MATERIAL VACCUM CANOPY ( MT_01 ) ROLL UP GATE ( MT_00 ) PATIO GUARD RAIL ( MT_02 ) METAL SCREEN ( MT_03 )WINDOW MULLION ( MT_04 ) STUCCO ( PT_03 ) STUCCO ( PT_02 ) STUCCO ( PT_01 ) LOUVER (MT_03) Project Name: 2Clean Express Car Wash Location: 1100 N. Tustin Ave., Anaheim, CA 92807 TO: Elizabeth Yee, City Planner FROM: Soojae Cho, | Owner DATE: March-15, 2022 RE: Proposed Express Car Wash | 1100 N. Tustin Avenue The following is a summary of the proposed development at 1100 N. Tustin Avenue, which I request approval on CUP. The proposed project is an express carwash facility that includes an approximately 6,500 square foot 2-story structure. This facility comprises a mechanical wash equipment structure, a trash enclosure, 16 self-service vacuum stations with two employee parking space and one loading space, and the existing 15,372 square foot 2-story office building will be demolished. A typical car wash facility gets one small truck delivery every few days. These deliveries occur outside of the operation hours of the car wash; therefore, I do not believe a designated loading area is required for this project. The hours of operation will be from 7 am to 8 pm, 7days per week, with two employees per shift. As currently proposed, customer vehicles will enter from North Tustin Avenue into the car wash queuing lanes. Upon passing through the washing tunnel and self-service vacuum stations, vehicles will exit the facility only by turning right onto La Palma Avenue. This one-way circulation pattern will minimize the traffic impact caused by the development. The construction is anticipated to begin in the third quarter of 2022 and be completed early in the first quarter of 2024, and the proposed project shall be consistent with the City’s development standards and be compatible with the surrounding community. Owner March 15, 2022 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Preparer’s Signature Title Date ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Page 1 Soojae Cho 1100 N Tustin Ave. Suite 200 Anaheim CA 92807 (714)231-3674 March 15, 2022 Anaheim Planning Department 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim CA 92805 PROJECT JUSTIFICATION Applicant: Soojae Cho Location: 1100 North Tustin Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807 Request: The proposed project is an express car wash facility at 1100 North Tustin Avenue requiring a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) per the Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030 and a City Variance for a nine foot wall on the north side of the property to buffer neighboring properties from any noise impacts. Background: The project is located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan area. Anaheim Canyon is a commerce and employment center for the City and the region. The project will assist in meeting overarching goals for Anaheim Canyon by supporting a successful business climate, providing environmentally sustainable operations, contributing to a comprehensive business vision, and promoting employment growth. Anaheim Canyon is envisioned as a prominent innovation zone that attracts businesses that take full advantage of new technologies. The car wash facility that is planned offers the most advanced equipment available. On the north the site is adjacent to Home Comfort USA that provides professional heating and air conditioning services. On the east the site is adjacent to PDC Interior, a design and contracting firm specializing in kitchen, bath and full home scope home remodeling. Currently located on the property is an undistinguished vacant office that previously served financial service businesses. There is minimal, outdated landscaping. The building will be removed to allow the new facility to be built and the entire property to be visually improved with an attractively designed building of approximately 6,500 sq. feet with new drought tolerant landscaping. Proposal: The proposed project consists of an express car wash facility with a vehicle queuing area, express car wash tunnel, vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls and employee parking stalls. The hours of operation will be 7:00 am to 8:00 pm making it available to customers before and after the typical work day. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Page 2 The project will provide 19 parking spaces consisting of 16 vehicle drying/vacuuming stalls, two employee stalls, and one Loading space. The parking analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc., a respected traffic engineering and transportation planning company, concluded that the drying/vacuuming parking stalls exceed the minimum and average peak requirements. This was based on the survey information gathered from four existing express car washes with similar hour and operating characteristics. During shift changes, special circumstances, and/or high demand periods a third employee may be on site in which case one of the drying/vacuuming spaces will be made available for employees. It is important that the staffing levels are sufficient to meet demand so customers are well served and are able to move efficiently through the wash, drying and vacuuming cycles thereby reducing congestion on- site and preventing any off site street congestion. The proposed carwash will provide 13 vehicle queuing positions. Also, based on data from similar facilities, the engineering study concluded that the maximum number of queuing station needed would be 16 and the average number of cars using the facilities at one time would be seven. Therefore, the proposed facility provides more than adequate vehicle queuing positions. While these details may not seem important, we want to assure the City of Anaheim knows that all operations and site planning are being analyzed in detail to make sure that the project contributes to the business vitality of the area and will not negatively impact surrounding neighbors. Additionally, car washes must be convenient if they are to be successful in replacing the “home car wash” with the more environmentally friendly option of an express wash. Home car washing contributes to storm drain contamination that can end up contaminating beaches and oceans. Efficiently operated express car washes such as the one being proposed for 1100 North Tustin, use recycled water that is fully contained on site. Nothing is dumped into the storm drains. All water will be discharged into the sanitary sewer system where it can be transported to a treatment facility. The noise study will include a recommended mitigation plan which will include constructing a nine foot wall along some portions of the north side of the property. Whatever additional mitigations the noise study recommends will be fully implemented to make sure impacts, if any, are minimal. It is important to be a good neighbor and we take pride in being good neighbors wherever we operate. Each of the tunnel dryers will be equipped with a state-of-the-art Power-Lock noise reducing air valve that reduces energy use by preventing airflow between vehicles and minimizing peak load charges. This will reduce noise levels and reduce the need for additional drying on some vehicles. The all-aluminum construction incorporates noise reduction materials. The Power Lock will save up to 30 percent on electric use, reduce noise frequencies by three to five decibels and stop dirty water or debris from being blown out of pick-up trucks into other vehicles of the bay resulting in a quieter, safer and more environmentally friendly facility. We are paying specific attention to the design of the facility so that it blends into the area with the look of a low rise office facility. The proposed building height of 32 feet is well below the allowed 60 feet height limit. The goal of the design is to respect the modern design context of the adjacent commercial area. Page 3 The landscaping plan is also a critical part of making sure the property presents well from both North Tustin and East La Palma Avenues. In consultation with the City, the landscaping will be comprised of drought tolerant California species, grown to appropriate heights that will not block drivers’ site lines and will be maintained at all times. Our overall goal is to make the project the most attractive commercial property in the area. CUP Findings: A. Indicate how the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. The proposed carwash at 110 North Tustin Avenue is the type of environmentally sustainable, economically productive, and technically advanced business the imagined by the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan. Additionally, the unique design of the facility and the new landscaping will improve the look of the corner at North Tustin and East La Palma Avenues. B. Explain how the site proposed for the use is large enough to accommodate anticipated growth of the development and allow the continued operation without causing a detriment to the particular area or to health and safety. The site provides sufficient space to include 19 parking space (two for employees, one for Loading, and 16 for drying/vacuuming stalls which may be interchanged as needed) and 13 vehicle queuing positions. Detailed studies of parking and queuing using real world data concluded that proposed parking and queuing spaces exceed the expected demand such that there will be no spillover effects on adjacent properties or city streets. Additionally, the selection of low noise dryers with the implementation of a noise mitigation plan will assure there is no excess noise emanating from the facility as is sometimes the case with less environmentally designed carwashes. C. Indicate how the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the roads designed and constructed to handle the traffic in the area. A trip generation study has been completed by Kunzman Associates. Based on the Trip Generation Analysis, the proposed project will not generate significant traffic and is not likely to impact the study area intersections. The proposed project site is presumed to have a less than significant Vehicle Miles of Travel impact to the study area. The one-way circulation has been carefully designed to eliminate any potential for on-site traffic congestion as well as prevent any congestion at the intersection of North Tustin and La Palma Avenues. Access to the site is only off of North Tustin Avenue. Upon entering the site, drivers will turn right directly into the tunnel queue. When they have finished washing and drying, drivers will exit onto La Palma Avenue. D. Indicate how approval of the Conditional Use Permit with any conditions of approval, will not harm the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Page 4 Approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit for this project will improve the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim by offering an environmentally superior option for washing cars over home washing or older car wash facilities, creating jobs that add to the economic vitality of the City; and improving the visibility of the property located at 1100 North Tustin Avenue. Anaheim has adopted development standards that are intended to protect public health and safety. This project will meet all the development standards of the City except for a request for a nine foot wall along portions of the northern property boundary – two feet higher than the seven feet limit per the Anaheim Municipal Code. The increased height is requested to mitigate sound and add additional noise protection for the surrounding area. We are excited about becoming a member of the Anaheim’s business community and look forward to telling you more about our facility as we move though the Conditional Use Permit and other City processes. Sincerely, 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 # Orange, CA 92868 Telephone: (714) 904-2821 # E-mail: bill @ traffic-engineer.com Web: www.traffic-engineer.com March 4, 2022 Soojae Cho c/o KNL Associates, Attn: Justin Kim 3055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 405 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Dear Mr. Cho: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates is pleased to submit this parking analysis for the 1100 North Tustin Avenue Express Car Wash project in the City of Anaheim. Kunzman Associates has been asked to prepare this analysis to determine if adequate parking and queuing on-site. This letter summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is located north of La Palma Avenue and east of Tustin Avenue at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim. Figure 1 shows the project location map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of an express car wash facility. The facility is composed of a vehicle queuing area, an express car wash tunnel, vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls, and employee parking stalls. From a traffic engineering point of view, this project is a single tunnel express car wash facility. Figure 2 contains the proposed project site plan. The proposed project is proposing to provide 19 parking spaces. The 19 parking spaces is made up of 16 vehicle drying/vacuuming stalls, 2 employee stalls, and 1 loading stall. ATTACHMENT NO. 5   EXPRESS CAR WASH SURVEYS In order to calculate the vehicle queuing demand for the proposed project, four similar facilities were surveyed within the City of Anaheim. In order to qualify as a similar facility, they needed to be in the City of Anaheim, have one car wash tunnel, provide on-site queuing, provide on-site vacuum stalls, and be SIMILAR in operations. From our experience, these types of express car wash facilities are all very similar. Engineering judgment has been used in the selection of similar facilities. Based on our experience with express car wash facilities, the peak periods are Friday from 12:00 Noon to 6:00 PM and Saturday from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Each facility is surveyed every 15 minutes. During each survey, the number of parked vehicles for drying/vacuuming and employees are counted. Also, the queue is observed. The queue includes all vehicles in line between the entrance and the tunnel entrance. Table 2 shows the selected similar facilities, the summary of the surveys, and Appendix B provides the complete survey data sets. Drive Thru Express Car Wash located at 590 North Magnolia Avenue was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. Anaheim Express Wash located at 210 North Euclid Way was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. Anaheim Express Car Wash located at 2961 West Ball Road was surveyed on 8-13-2021 and 8-14-2021. Cruizers Express Car Wash located at 1725 South Brookhurst Street was surveyed on 8-13-2021 and 8-14-2021. PARKING ANALYSIS Based on the data collected from four similar facilities, the minimum peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls of 12 and occupied employee parking stalls is 2 was observed, the average peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls of 15 and occupied employee parking stalls is 3 was observed, and the maximum peak occupied vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls of 22 and occupied employee parking stalls is 3 was observed. It is reasonable to assume that if the proposed facility provides at least the average peak vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls and employee parking stalls, that it should adequately accommodate patrons and employees at the express car wash facility. The proposed express car wash should provide at least provides at least the 15 vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls and 3 employee parking stalls. The proposed project will provide 16 vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls, 2 employee parking stalls, and 1 loading stall. For drying/vacuuming parking stalls, this exceeds the minimum and average peak observed occupied parking stall requirements. For employee parking stalls, this equals the minimum peak observed occupied parking stall requirements. Based on discussions with the applicant, they will only have two on-site employees at any given point in time. During a shift change or under special circumstances when more than two employees are on-site, employees can park in a drying/vacuuming parking stall.   The proposed facility provides adequate on-site employee parking space. CONCLUSION The proposed project site is located north of La Palma Avenue and east of Tustin Avenue at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project consists of a single tunnel express car wash facility. The proposed project will provide 16 vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls, 2 employee parking stalls, and 1 loading stall. The proposed facility provides adequate on-site employee parking space. It should be noted that express car wash facilities maximum usage is dictated by the efficiency of the automated car wash and the number of vacuum/drying parking spaces. Much like a gasoline service station, patrons will tend to not wait very long. They will either go to another car wash or they will come back later. Express car washes are a convenience. If it is not convenient, patrons will not utilize the service. It has been a pleasure to service your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 904- 2821. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES Lisa D Kunzman Robert W Kunzman Associate Senior Associate KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES William A Kunzman, P.E. Principal #10073a-6 Patrons Employee Total Friday Saturday Friday SaturdayDrive Thru Express Car Wash 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 16 0 16 12 15 3 3Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 19 2 2112 13 3 2Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 26 0 26 19 22 3 3Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 15 0 15 15 15 2 21See Appendix B for raw survey data.Patrons EmployeesTable 1Name LocationParking SpacesMaximum Occupied SpacesExpress Car Wash Survey Summary   APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS   GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out).   CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper.   HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles.   PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip-ends. A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles.   UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles.   APPENDIX B EXPRESS CAR WASH VEHICLE PARKING SURVEYS Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 8 1 10:15 AM 2 6 2 10:30 AM 2 13 1 10:45 AM 3 14 2 11:00 AM 2 12 1 11:15 AM 2 15 1 11:30 AM 3 8 4 11:45 AM 3 9 3 12:00 PM 2 5 1 2 7 1 12:15 PM 2 7 2 2 13 1 12:30 PM 2 7 3 2 15 2 12:45 PM 2 9 3 2 13 2 1:00 PM 2 6 3 2 12 3 1:15 PM 2 7 1 2 9 3 1:30 PM 2 6 1 2 10 3 1:45 PM 2 4 1 2 6 3 2:00 PM 2 8 2 2 8 2 2:15 PM 2 6 3 2 11 1 2:30 PM 2 7 3 2 15 4 2:45 PM 2 9 2 2 14 2 3:00 PM 2 5 2 2 12 3 3:15 PM 2 7 2 2 13 3 3:30 PM 2 9 3 2 14 2 3:45 PM 2 11 4 2 6 2 4:00 PM 2 10 1 2 8 1 4:15 PM 2 12 2 4:30 PM 2 9 1 4:45 PM 2 11 2 5:00 PM 2 12 2 5:15 PM 3 8 1 5:30 PM 2 10 1 5:45 PM 2 5 1 6:00 PM 2 9 1 Drive Thru Express Car Wash 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 8/06/2021, 8/07/2021 Day Time Queue Friday Parked Vehicles Parked Vehicles Queue Saturday Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 5 3 10:15 AM 2 4 1 10:30 AM 2 7 1 10:45 AM 2 6 2 11:00 AM 2 9 1 11:15 AM 2 5 1 11:30 AM 2 4 1 11:45 AM 2 8 1 12:00 PM 2 9 2 2 9 1 12:15 PM 2 8 3 2 11 2 12:30 PM 2 4 2 2 4 3 12:45 PM 2 5 2 2 10 2 1:00 PM 2 4 2 2 7 1 1:15 PM 2 4 2 2 7 1 1:30 PM 2 5 1 2 9 2 1:45 PM 2 6 3 2 10 1 2:00 PM 2 10 3 2 13 2 2:15 PM 2 10 3 2 5 3 2:30 PM 2 8 3 2 7 3 2:45 PM 2 4 2 2 11 4 3:00 PM 3 7 2 2 11 3 3:15 PM 3 8 1 2 7 4 3:30 PM 3 6 3 2 10 3 3:45 PM 3 6 2 2 9 1 4:00 PM 3 9 2 2 7 2 4:15 PM 3 12 3 4:30 PM 3 3 1 4:45 PM 3 5 2 5:00 PM 3 5 2 5:15 PM 2 6 2 5:30 PM 2 6 1 5:45 PM 2 6 1 6:00 PM 2 7 3 Queue Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 8/06/2021, 8/07/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 3 10 1 10:15 AM 3 12 1 10:30 AM 3 15 2 10:45 AM 3 18 0 11:00 AM 3 22 1 11:15 AM 3 20 0 11:30 AM 3 22 0 11:45 AM 3 19 1 12:00 PM 3 7 0 3 8 3 12:15 PM 3 9 0 3 9 3 12:30 PM 3 8 0 3 14 4 12:45 PM 3 8 1 3 21 2 1:00 PM 3 8 1 3 17 4 1:15 PM 3 6 0 3 19 4 1:30 PM 3 7 3 3 15 6 1:45 PM 3 11 0 2 14 0 2:00 PM 2 11 0 2 13 0 2:15 PM 2 9 0 2 14 0 2:30 PM 2 7 0 3 13 1 2:45 PM 2 9 2 3 9 1 3:00 PM 2 9 0 3 14 2 3:15 PM 2 9 0 3 8 0 3:30 PM 2 7 0 3 7 1 3:45 PM 2 11 2 3 11 0 4:00 PM 2 13 0 3 15 1 4:15 PM 2 14 3 4:30 PM 2 15 2 4:45 PM 2 16 0 5:00 PM 2 16 5 5:15 PM 2 17 4 5:30 PM 2 19 0 5:45 PM 2 11 0 6:00 PM 2 12 0 Queue Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 8/13/2021, 8/14/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 14 8 10:15 AM 2 15 12 10:30 AM 2 15 15 10:45 AM 2 15 14 11:00 AM 2 15 10 11:15 AM 2 15 7 11:30 AM 2 13 8 11:45 AM 2 15 10 12:00 PM 2 10 9 2 15 16 12:15 PM 2 12 11 2 12 10 12:30 PM 2 15 7 2 13 14 12:45 PM 2 15 9 2 15 10 1:00 PM 2 14 4 2 15 11 1:15 PM 2 13 8 2 14 7 1:30 PM 2 14 11 2 14 8 1:45 PM 2 13 10 2 15 11 2:00 PM 2 14 4 2 13 8 2:15 PM 2 11 3 2 14 9 2:30 PM 2 14 7 2 15 11 2:45 PM 2 15 12 2 15 10 3:00 PM 2 13 10 2 14 6 3:15 PM 2 11 7 2 15 8 3:30 PM 2 15 10 2 13 7 3:45 PM 2 14 8 2 15 9 4:00 PM 2 15 3 2 14 4 4:15 PM 2 15 1 4:30 PM 2 12 3 4:45 PM 2 10 4 5:00 PM 2 12 5 5:15 PM 2 9 2 5:30 PM 2 8 0 5:45 PM 2 12 2 6:00 PM 2 8 1 Queue Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 8/13/2021, 8/14/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim Prepared for: JSB Investment Group Attention: Soojae Cho 1100 North Tustin Avenue, 2nd Floor Anaheim, California 92807 Prepared by: Eilar Associates, Inc. 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, California 92025 Phone: 760-738-5570 info@eilarassociates.com Job # S210712.2 March 7, 2022 AATTACHMENT NO. 6 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Introduction 1 2.1 Project Description 2.2 Project Location 2.3 Applicable Noise Regulations 3.0 Environmental Setting 2 3.1 Existing Noise Environment 3.2 Future Noise Environment 4.0 Methodology and Equipment 3 4.1 Methodology 4.2 Measurement Equipment 5.0 Noise Impacts 4 6.0 Conclusion 5 7.0 Certification 5 8.0 References 6 Figures 1.Vicinity Map 2.Assessor’s Parcel Map 3.Satellite Aerial Photograph Showing Noise Measurement Location 4.Topographic Map 5.Satellite Aerial Photograph Showing Site Plan, Equipment Noise Contours, and Source, Receiver, and Barrier Locations Appendices A.Project Plans B.Applicable Noise Regulations C.Manufacturer Data Sheets D.CadnaA Analysis Data and Results Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 1 1.0 Executive Summary The proposed project, Express Car Wash – Anaheim, consists of the demolition of existing on-site structures and the construction of a new car wash facility. The project site is located at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California. The purpose of this report is to assess noise impacts from proposed equipment at the facility and to determine if project design features are necessary and feasible to reduce project-related noise impacts to meet applicable noise limits. Noise limits specified within the City of Anaheim Municipal Code must be met at neighboring noise-sensitive property lines. Calculations show that, with the proposed property line sound walls in place, equipment noise levels are expected to meet applicable noise limits of the City of Anaheim at all surrounding property lines, assuming the proposed property line barrier is constructed to the minimum standards and configuration detailed herein. 2.0 Introduction This acoustical analysis report is submitted to satisfy the noise requirements of the City of Anaheim. Its purpose is to assess noise impacts from on-site project-related mechanical noise sources and to determine if project design features are necessary to reduce the noise impacts to be compliant with applicable noise limits. All noise level or sound level values presented herein are expressed in terms of decibels (dB), with A-weighting, abbreviated "dBA," to approximate the hearing sensitivity of humans. Time-averaged noise levels are expressed by the symbol “LEQ.” Unless a different time period is specified, “LEQ” is implied to mean a period of one hour. Some of the data may also be presented as octave-band-filtered and/or A-octave-band-filtered data, which are a series of sound spectra centered about each stated frequency, with half of the bandwidth above and half of the bandwidth below each stated frequency. This data is typically used for machinery noise analysis and barrier calculations. Sound pressure is the actual noise experienced by a human or registered by a sound level instrument. When sound pressure is used to describe a noise source, the distance from the noise source must be specified in order to provide complete information. Sound power, on the other hand, is a specialized analytical metric used to provide information without the distance requirement, and may be used to calculate the sound pressure at any desired distance. 2.1 Project Description The proposed project, Express Car Wash – Anaheim, consists of the demolition of existing on-site structures and the construction of a new car wash facility with 17 vacuum stations. The proposed hours of operation for the car wash facility are 7 a.m. to 9 p.m., seven days a week. The proposed car wash equipment is the primary focus of this analysis, as it is expected to generate the most noise on site; however, vacuum hose, intercom equipment, and rooftop HVAC equipment noise impacts were also evaluated in this analysis. For additional project details, please refer to the project plans, provided in Appendix A. Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 2 2.2 Project Location The project site is located at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California. The Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) for the site is 346-142-04. The project site currently contains a commercial structure, to be demolished. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south, east, and west. For a graphical representation of the site, please refer to the Vicinity Map, Assessor’s Parcel Map, Satellite Aerial Photograph, and Topographic Map provided as Figures 1 through 4, respectively. 2.3 Applicable Noise Regulations The City of Anaheim Municipal Code specifies noise level limits at surrounding property lines. Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code states that noise impacts to off-site receivers should not exceed 60 dBA. Pertinent sections of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code are provided as Appendix B. 3.0 Environmental Setting 3.1 Existing Noise Environment The primary noise source in the vicinity of the project site is traffic noise on North Tustin Avenue and East La Palma Avenue. No other noise source is considered significant. 3.1.1 Measured Noise Level An on-site inspection and a traffic noise measurement were made on the morning of Tuesday, August 3, 2021. The weather conditions were as follows: sunny skies, moderate humidity, and temperature in the low 70s, with calm winds. A noise measurement was made near the southwest corner of the project site, at approximately 98 feet north of the East La Palma Avenue median and approximately 75 feet east of the North Tustin Avenue median. The primary source of noise during the measurement was traffic noise. The microphone was placed at approximately five feet above the existing grade. After a 15-minute continuous sound level measurement, no changes in the LEQ were observable and results were recorded. The measured noise level and related weather conditions are shown in Table 1, and the noise measurement location is shown in Figure 3. Table 1. On-Site Noise Measurement Conditions and Results Date Tuesday, August 3, 2021 Time 7:43 a.m. – 7:58 a.m. Conditions Sunny skies, calm winds, temperature in the low 70s, with moderate humidity Measured Noise Level 72.6 dBA LEQ 3.2 Future Noise Environment The future noise environment in the vicinity of the project site will be primarily a result of the same noise sources, as well as the noise generated by the proposed mechanical equipment on site, which includes car wash tunnel equipment, vacuum hoses, intercom equipment, and rooftop HVAC equipment. The car wash dryers are expected to be the primary project-related noise source on site. As the central vacuum motor units are Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 3 expected to be located indoors, they are not expected to generate high levels of noise, and were therefore excluded from the analysis. The car wash tunnel is proposed to include twelve 15HP Tech 21 Dryers, manufactured by MacNeil, which will be located near the exit of the tunnel. Each of the tunnel dryers is proposed to be equipped with PowerLock noise-reducing air valves in the closed position. Noise levels of the proposed car wash dryer equipment were provided by the manufacturer. Additionally, the noise impacts from each individual vacuum station hose were analyzed. Eilar Associates conducted measurements of comparable vacuum hose units at an existing car wash in Vista, California, to obtain accurate information to incorporate into calculations. The proposed intercom systems are expected to be equivalent to those manufactured by HME. The HME Intercom System is documented to have a maximum noise level of 84 dBA at one foot from the speaker post. The exact unit of the proposed rooftop HVAC equipment is currently unknown; however, it is expected to be equivalent to the 5-ton 50HCQA06 unit, manufactured by Carrier. For further details on proposed on-site equipment, please refer to Appendix C: Manufacturer Data Sheets. Noise levels of the proposed car wash dryers, vacuum, and HVAC equipment are shown in Table 2. As the noise levels for the car wash dryers were provided in broadband sound pressure levels at a specified distance, sound pressure levels were converted to sound power levels using the reference distance given, and a standard frequency spectrum typical of car wash dryers was applied. Table 2. Sound Power Level of Proposed Mechanical Equipment Equipment Sound Power Level at Octave Band Frequency (dB) Total (dBA) 31.5 63 125 250 500 1K 2K 4K 8K 15HP Tech 21 Dryer -- 91 95 92 92 93 91 89 86 98 Vacuum Station 73 73 69 67 69 74 78 80 83 86 Carrier 50HCQA06 -- 58 67 69 73 75 71 66 63 78 4.0 Methodology and Equipment 4.1 Methodology Modeling of the outdoor noise environment is accomplished using CadnaA Version 2021, which is a model- based computer program developed by DataKustik for predicting noise impacts in a wide variety of conditions. CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement) assists in the calculation, presentation, assessment, and alleviation of noise exposure. It allows for the input of project information such as noise source data, barriers, structures, and topography to create a detailed model and uses the most up-to-date calculation standards to predict outdoor noise impacts. Noise standards used by CadnaA that are particularly relevant to this analysis include ISO 9613- 2 (Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors). CadnaA provides results that are in line with basic acoustical calculations for distance attenuation and barrier insertion loss. Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 4 4.2 Measurement Equipment The following equipment was used at the site to measure existing noise levels: Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 Sound Level Meter, Serial # 4085 Larson Davis Model CA200 Type 1 Calibrator, Serial # 16455 Digital camera, tripod, microphone with windscreen The sound level meter was field-calibrated immediately prior to the noise measurement and checked afterward to ensure accuracy. All sound level measurements conducted and presented in this report, in accordance with the regulations, were made with a sound level meter that conforms to the American National Standards Institute specifications for sound level meters (ANSI S1.4). All instruments are calibrated and maintained per the manufacturers’ standards. 5.0 Noise Impacts Noise levels of the proposed on-site mechanical equipment were calculated using CadnaA at surrounding properties. These receivers represent the nearest affected noise-sensitive locations, and therefore, any other potential receivers would be exposed to lower noise levels as they will receive additional attenuation due to distance and shielding from intervening structures. Equipment noise levels were calculated considering shielding provided by the proposed buildings on site. Additionally, calculations consider the proposed property line sound walls along the north and east property lines, and with a small return along the south boundary of the southeastern vacuum station (see Figure 5), which ranges in height from seven to nine feet. Receivers were calculated at a height of five feet above grade. For a worst-case analysis, all on-site equipment was evaluated as being in constant operation. Results of the analysis are shown in Table 3 below. Equipment noise contours and receiver locations are shown in Figure 5. Additional information is shown in Appendix D. As shown above, with the proposed property line sound wall along the north and east property lines, equipment noise levels are expected to meet applicable noise limits of the City of Anaheim at all surrounding noise-sensitive receivers. In order to be effective, the sound barrier should be solid and constructed of masonry, wood, plastic, fiberglass, steel, or a combination of those materials, with no cracks or gaps through or below the wall. The wall should be constructed as shown in Figure 5, with a minimum height ranging from seven to nine feet as indicated within this graphic. Any seams or cracks must be filled or caulked. If wood is used, it can be tongue and groove and must be at least 7/8-inch thick or have a surface density of at least 3½ pounds per square foot. If visibility is a specific concern, glass or clear plastic may be used. Sheet metal of 18-gauge (minimum) may be used if it meets Table 3. Calculated Noise Levels for Proposed Equipment Receiver Receiver Location Noise Limit (dBA LEQ) Equipment Noise Level (dBA LEQ) R1 North Property Line 60 56.9 R2 East Property Line – North 60 50.2 R3 East Property Line – South 60 54.0 R4 South Property Line 60 59.4 Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 5 the other criteria and is properly supported and stiffened so that it does not rattle or create noise itself from vibration or wind. If an access door is required, the access door should be equipped with appropriate acoustical seals. By equipping the door with all-around weather-tight seals and an airtight threshold closure at the bottom, a loss of up to 10 STC points can be prevented. Additionally, any windows proposed in the wall of the car wash tunnel should be appropriately sealed with acoustical sealant. As shown above, with the proposed property line sound wall in place, proposed mechanical noise levels are expected to comply with the applicable noise limits at all nearby property lines, assuming the proposed property line wall is constructed to the minimum standards and configuration listed herein. Any other noise-sensitive receivers are located at a greater distance from proposed equipment and will be exposed to lesser noise levels due to distance attenuation and shielding provided by intervening structures. 6.0 Conclusion Calculations show that, with the proposed property line sound walls in place, equipment noise levels are expected to meet applicable noise limits of the City of Anaheim at all surrounding property lines, assuming the proposed property line barrier is constructed to the minimum standards and configuration detailed herein. This analysis is based upon a current worst-case scenario of anticipated equipment noise levels. Substitution of equipment with higher noise emission levels may invalidate the recommendations of this study. These conclusions and recommendations are based on the best and most current project-related information available at the time this study was prepared. 7.0 Certification All recommendations for noise control are based on the best information available at the time our consulting services are provided. However, as there are many factors involved in sound and impact transmission, and Eilar Associates has no control over the construction, workmanship, or materials, Eilar Associates is specifically not liable for final results of any recommendations or implementation of the recommendations. The findings and recommendations of this acoustical analysis report are based on the information available and are a true and factual analysis of the potential acoustical issues associated with the Express Car Wash – Anaheim project, to be located at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California. This report was prepared by Mo Ouwenga and Amy Hool. Mo Ouwenga, INCE Amy Hool, INCE Acoustical Consultant President/CEO Eilar Associates, Inc. Acoustical and Environmental Consulting Services Acoustical Analysis Report for Express Car Wash – Anaheim • Job # S210712.2 • March 7, 2022 Page 6 8.0 References City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Adopted April 25, 2006. DataKustik, CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement), Version 2021. Figures Project Location 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Eilar Associates, Inc. 760-738-5570 Escondido, California 92025 Job #S210712.2 Vicinity Map Figure 1 N Orange County Assessor’s Parcel Number: 346-142-04 Job # S210712.2 Assessor’s Parcel Map Figure 2 760-738-5570 Eilar Associates, Inc. 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, California 92025 N Project Location www.ocgis.com/ocpw/landrecords N Noise Measurement Location Project Location Satellite Aerial Photograph Showing Noise Measurement Location Job # S210712.2 Figure 3210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, California 92025 760-738-5570 Eilar Associates, Inc. Project Location N Job # S210712.2 Topographic Map Figure 4 Eilar Associates, Inc. 760-738-5570 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, California 92025 ≥ 60 dB ≥ 65 dB ≥ 70 dB ≥ 75 dB ≥ 80 dB Receiver Location Car Wash Dryer Vacuum Hose Station Drive Through Intercom Rooftop HVAC Equipment NR2 R3 R4 R1 Proposed 7-foot Property Line Wall Proposed 7-foot Property Line Wall Proposed 9-foot Property Line Wall Escondido, California 92025 760-738-5570 Eilar Associates, Inc. 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Figure 5 Site Plan, Mechanical Equipment Satellite Aerial Photograph Showing and Barrier Locations Noise Contours, and Source, Receiver, Job # S210712.2 Appendix A Project Plans Appendix B Applicable Noise Regulations Chapter 6.70 SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS Sections: 6.70.010 Established. 6.70.020 Violations and penalties. 6.70.030 Enforcement. 6.70.010 ESTABLISHED. Sound produced in excess of the sound pressure levels permitted herein are hereby determined to be objectionable and constitute an infringement upon the right and quiet enjoyment ofproperty in this City. No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces asound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response. The sound level measuring microphone shall be placed at any point on the property line, but not closer than three (3) feet from any wall and not less than three (3) feet above the ground, where the above listed maximum sound pressure level shall apply. At any point the measured level shall be the average of not less than three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source’s ofthe alleged objectionable sound are not operating. Sound pressure levels shall be measured with a sound level meter manufactured according to American Standard S1.4- 1961 published by the American Standards Association, Inc., New York City, New York. Traffic sounds sound created by emergencyactivities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official. (Ord. 2526 § 1 (part); June 18, 1968; Ord. 3400 § 1; February 11, 1975: Ord. 6020 § 1; April 25, 2006.) 6.70.020 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. The first violation of this chapter by any person shall be punishable as an infraction in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Penal Code and the California Government Code. The second and all subsequent violations of said chapter committed by such person shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. (Ord. 5929 § 9; July 27, 2004.) 6.70.030 ENFORCEMENT. The Code Enforcement Manager of the City of Anaheim shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 5812 § 25; June 11, 2002.) Appendix C Manufacturer Data Sheets MacNeil Wash Systems Limited •90 Welham Road •Barrie,Ontario,Canada L4N 8Y4 Tel:(800)361-7797 or (705)722-7649 •Fax:(705)722-0582 •www.macneilwash.com •info@macneilwash.com OCT / 07 POWERLOCK SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS Individual Fan Study 10HP Tech 21 Dryer 10HP at 1 meter without PowerLock = 92DB 10HP at 1 meter with PowerLock open = 88DB 10HP at 1 meter with PowerLock closed = 85DB 15HP Tech 21 Dryer 15HP at 1 meter without PowerLock = 96DB 15HP at 1 meter with PowerLock open = 92DB 15HP at 1 meter with PowerLock closed = 87DB On average, a site will appreciate a 30-50% sound reduction, depending on its dryer package, valve cycling, and wash area. Bob MacNeil R&D Memo Re: Drive-Thru Sound Pressure Levels From the Menu Board or Speaker Post The sound pressure levels from the menu board or speaker post are as follows: 1. Sound pressure level (SPL) contours (A weighted) were measured on a typical HME SPP2 speaker post. The test condition was for pink noise set to 84 dBA at 1 foot in front of the speaker. All measurements were conducted outside with the speaker post placed 8 feet from a non-absorbing building wall and at an oblique angle to the wall. These measurements should not be construed to guarantee performance with any particular speaker post in any particular environment. They are typical results obtained under the conditions described above. 2. The SPL levels are presented for different distances from the speaker post: Distance from the Speaker (Feet) SPL (dBA) 1 foot 84 dBA 2 feet 78 dBA 4 feet 72 dBA 8 feet 66 dBA 16 feet 60 dBA 32 feet 54 dBA 3. The above levels are based on factory recommended operating levels, which are preset for HME components and represent the optimum level for drive-thru operations in the majority of the installations. Also, HME incorporates automatic volume control (AVC) into many of our Systems. AVC will adjust the outbound volume based on the outdoor, ambient noise level. When ambient noise levels naturally decrease at night, AVC will reduce the outbound volume on the system. See below for example: Distance from Outside Speaker Decibel Level of standard system with 45 dB of outside noise without AVC Decibel level of standard system with 45 dB of outside noise with AVC active 1 foot 84 dBA 60 dBA 2 feet 78 dBA 54 dBA 4 feet 72 dBA 48 dBA 8 feet 66 dBA 42 dBA 16 feet 60 dBA 36 dBA If there are any further questions regarding this issue please contact HME customer service at 1-800-848-4468. Thank you for your interest in HME’s products. © 2019 Carrier Corporation Form 50HCQ-4-12-07PD Rev. A Product Data WeatherMaster® Single Packaged Rooftop Heat Pump Units 3 to 10 Nominal Tons 50HCQ 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 12 with Puron® (R-410) Refrigerant 5 * Minimum electric heat CFM exceptions: LEGEND NOTES: 1. Outdoor sound data is measure in accordance with AHRI standard 270. 2. Measurements are expressed in terms of sound power. Do not compare these values to sound pressure values because sound pressure depends on specific environmental factors which nor- mally do not match individual applications. Sound power values are independent of the environment and therefore more accurate. 3. A-weighted sound ratings filter out very high and very low frequen- cies, to better approximate the response of “average” human ear. A-weighted measurements for Carrier units are taken in accor- dance with AHRI standard 270. MINIMUM - MAXIMUM AIRFLOWS (CFM) COOLING AND ELECTRIC HEAT UNIT COOLING ELECTRIC HEATERS Minimum CFM Minimum CFM 2-Speed Fan Motor (at High Speed) Minimum CFM 2-Speed Fan Motor (at Low Speed) Maximum CFM Minimum CFM Maximum CFM 50HCQA04 900 N/A N/A 1500 900 1500 50HCQA05 1200 N/A N/A 2000 1200 2000 50HCQA06 1500 N/A N/A 2500 1500 2500 50HCQA07 1800 N/A N/A 3000 1800 3000 50HCQD07 1800 1800 1200 3000 1800 3000 50HCQD08 2250 2250 1500 3750 2250* 3750 50HCQD09 2550 2873 1915 4250 2252* 4250 50HCQD12 3000 3380 2253 5000 3000* 5000 UNIT UNIT VOLTAGE HEATER kW UNIT CONFIGURATION REQUIRED MINIMUM CFM 50HCQD08 50HCQD09 575 17.0 Horizontal or Vertical 2800 34.0 2350 50HCQD12 230 50.0 Vertical 3550 50.0 Horizontal 3420 43.5 Horizontal or Vertical 3040 575 50.0 Vertical 3150 33.5 Vertical 3520 33.5 Horizontal 3420 26.5 Vertical 3610 SOUND PERFORMANCE 50HCQ UNIT OUTDOOR SOUND (dB) AT 60 Hz A-Weighted 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 A04 76 51.8 69.0 64.6 67.8 70.7 63.8 60.9 59.0 A05 79 56.1 69.6 68.7 72.5 72.8 68.9 65.0 61.2 A06 79 57.7 66.6 68.7 72.9 74.5 71.1 67.6 62.6 A07 81 86.7 82.7 79.1 78.4 75.4 71.2 67.8 62.9 D07 81 86.7 82.7 79.1 78.4 75.4 71.2 67.8 62.9 D08 83 87.3 81.6 79.7 80.6 79.0 73.5 69.2 66.1 D09 87 61.7 74.7 77.4 82.6 84.9 81.9 78.8 75.9 D12 83 61.0 67.3 75.1 77.7 78.1 75.5 71.2 66.7 dB — Decibel Appendix D CadnaA Analysis Data and Results S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Eilar Associates, Inc. 210 South Juniper Street, Suite 100 Escondido, California 92025-4230 Phone: (760) 738-5570 Date: 07 Mar 2022 Calculation Configuration Configuration Parameter Value General Country (user defined) Max. Error (dB)0.00 Max. Search Radius (#(Unit,LEN))2000.00 Min. Dist Src to Rcvr 0.00 Partition Raster Factor 0.50 Max. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1000.00 Min. Length of Section (#(Unit,LEN))1.00 Min. Length of Section (%)0.00 Proj. Line Sources On Proj. Area Sources On Ref. Time Reference Time Day (min)960.00 Reference Time Night (min)480.00 Daytime Penalty (dB)0.00 Recr. Time Penalty (dB)6.00 Night-time Penalty (dB)10.00 DTM Standard Height (m)0.00 Model of Terrain Triangulation Reflection max. Order of Reflection 0 Search Radius Src 100.00 Search Radius Rcvr 100.00 Max. Distance Source - Rcvr 1000.00 1000.00 Min. Distance Rvcr - Reflector 1.00 1.00 Min. Distance Source - Reflector 0.10 Industrial (ISO 9613) Lateral Diffraction some Obj Obst. within Area Src do not shield On Screening Excl. Ground Att. over Barrier Dz with limit (20/25) Barrier Coefficients C1,2,3 3.0 20.0 0.0 Temperature (#(Unit,TEMP))10 rel. Humidity (%)70 Ground Absorption G 0.50 Wind Speed for Dir. (#(Unit,SPEED))3.0 Roads (TNM) Railways (Schall 03 (1990)) Strictly acc. to Schall 03 / Schall-Transrapid Aircraft (???) Strictly acc. to AzB Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Receivers Name M.ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates Day Night Day Night Type Auto Noise Type X Y Z (dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(dBA)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) R1 56.9 56.9 60.0 0.0 5.00 r 496.00 460.08 5.00 R2 50.2 50.2 60.0 0.0 5.00 r 570.74 450.00 5.00 R3 54.0 54.0 60.0 0.0 5.00 r 568.32 316.43 5.00 R4 59.4 59.4 60.0 0.0 5.00 r 489.58 137.16 5.00 Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Point Sources Name M.ID Result. PWL Lw / Li Correction Sound Reduction Attenuation Operating Time K0 Freq.Direct.Height Coordinates Day Evening Night Type Value norm.Day Evening Night R Area Day Special Night X Y Z (dBA)(dBA)(dBA)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)dB(A)(ft²)(min)(min)(min)(dB)(Hz)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) Rooftop HVAC Unit 78.1 78.1 78.1 Lw AC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)3.00 g 476.42 362.62 13.50 Drive Through Intercom 1 84.5 84.5 84.5 Lw DT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500 (none)4.00 r 464.32 346.54 4.00 Drive Through Intercom 2 84.5 84.5 84.5 Lw DT 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 500 (none)4.00 r 450.63 346.90 4.00 Vac Station 1 +86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.13 288.81 4.00 Vac Station 2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.26 300.26 4.00 Vac Station 3 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.39 312.67 4.00 Vac Station 4 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.76 324.82 4.00 Vac Station 5 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.72 336.71 4.00 Vac Station 5.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 563.77 348.33 4.00 Vac Station 6 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 564.51 383.42 4.00 Vac Station 7 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 564.91 395.09 4.00 Vac Station 8 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 564.93 407.21 4.00 Vac Station 9 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 565.51 419.24 4.00 Vac Station 10 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 565.79 431.34 4.00 Vac Station 10.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 565.65 443.08 4.00 Vac Station 11 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 511.99 431.94 4.00 Vac Station 12 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 511.95 420.16 4.00 Vac Station 13 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 511.58 408.12 4.00 Vac Station 14 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 511.44 396.06 4.00 Vac Station 14.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 511.56 384.18 4.00 Vac Station 15 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 516.09 378.54 4.00 Vac Station 15.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 515.93 367.61 4.00 Vac Station 16 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 516.05 361.39 4.00 Vac Station 16.2 86.2 86.2 86.2 Lw V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)4.00 r 515.78 350.44 4.00 Dryer 1 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)3.00 r 488.57 413.22 3.00 Dryer 2 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 491.99 413.22 5.00 Dryer 3 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)8.00 r 495.33 413.22 8.00 Dryer 4 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 498.86 413.22 5.00 Dryer 5 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)3.00 r 502.71 413.22 3.00 Dryer 6 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)3.00 r 488.57 408.87 3.00 Dryer 7 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 491.99 408.87 5.00 Dryer 8 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)8.00 r 495.33 408.87 8.00 Dryer 9 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 498.86 408.87 5.00 Dryer 10 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)3.00 r 502.71 408.87 3.00 Dryer 11 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 491.99 404.35 5.00 Dryer 12 98.0 98.0 98.0 Lw D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (none)5.00 r 498.86 404.35 5.00 Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Barriers Name M.ID Absorption Z-Ext.Cantilever Height left right horz.vert.Begin End (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 7ft P.L. Wall + CW 1 18.00 r CW 2 18.00 r CW 3 10.00 CW 4 +8.00 CW 5 23.50 0.00 CW 6 +23.50 0.00 Return +7.00 r Trash +6.00 r Geometry - Barriers Name M.ID Absorption Z-Ext.Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz.vert.Begin End x y z Ground (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) 7ft P.L. Wall +567.01 287.29 7.00 0.00 570.16 459.79 7.00 0.00 524.17 458.78 7.00 0.00 524.12 458.79 9.00 0.00 474.40 458.15 9.00 0.00 474.37 458.15 7.00 0.00 440.72 457.95 7.00 0.00 CW 1 18.00 r 489.15 424.54 18.00 0.00 484.24 424.60 18.00 0.00 482.58 334.05 18.00 0.00 487.69 333.99 18.00 0.00 CW 2 18.00 r 501.29 424.41 18.00 0.00 507.04 424.36 18.00 0.00 505.72 333.76 18.00 0.00 499.80 333.82 18.00 0.00 CW 3 10.00 482.58 334.05 18.00 0.00 487.69 333.99 18.00 0.00 499.80 333.82 18.00 0.00 505.72 333.76 18.00 0.00 CW 4 +8.00 484.24 424.60 18.00 0.00 489.15 424.54 18.00 0.00 501.29 424.41 18.00 0.00 507.04 424.36 18.00 0.00 CW 5 23.50 0.00 507.04 424.36 18.00 0.00 505.72 333.76 18.00 0.00 CW 6 +23.50 0.00 484.24 424.60 18.00 0.00 482.58 334.05 18.00 0.00 Return +7.00 r 567.01 287.29 7.00 0.00 559.44 287.29 7.00 0.00 Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Name M.ID Absorption Z-Ext.Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz.vert.Begin End x y z Ground (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) Trash +6.00 r 551.63 459.29 6.00 0.00 551.53 444.87 6.00 0.00 569.82 444.88 6.00 0.00 Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Buildings Name M.ID RB Residents Absorption Height Begin (ft) Vacuum Room 0 8.00 r Office 0 35.00 r Restroom 0 10.00 r Stair 0 25.00 r Mechanical Room 0 10.50 r Geometry - Buildings Name M.ID RB Residents Absorption Height Coordinates Begin x y z Ground (ft)(ft)(ft)(ft)(ft) Vacuum Room 0 8.00 r 554.20 378.14 8.00 0.00 554.05 358.31 8.00 0.00 568.31 358.32 8.00 0.00 568.67 378.01 8.00 0.00 Office 0 35.00 r 482.68 318.57 35.00 0.00 466.86 318.82 35.00 0.00 467.40 359.84 35.00 0.00 472.31 359.83 35.00 0.00 483.18 359.59 35.00 0.00 482.57 336.21 35.00 0.00 Restroom 0 10.00 r 525.78 332.78 10.00 0.00 511.76 333.33 10.00 0.00 511.97 350.07 10.00 0.00 526.07 349.79 10.00 0.00 Stair 0 25.00 r 511.76 333.33 25.00 0.00 511.54 318.06 25.00 0.00 517.33 317.87 25.00 0.00 517.08 312.05 25.00 0.00 525.38 311.97 25.00 0.00 525.78 332.78 25.00 0.00 Mechanical Room 0 10.50 r 483.17 359.59 10.50 0.00 484.24 424.60 10.50 0.00 473.60 424.83 10.50 0.00 472.31 359.83 10.50 0.00 Eilar Associates, Inc. S210712.2 Express Car Wash - Anaheim Sound Level Spectra Name ID Type 1/3 Oktave Spectrum (dB)Source Weight.31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 A lin 15HP Tech 21 - PowerLocks Closed D Lw (c)90.8 94.8 91.8 92.2 93.3 91.4 88.9 85.7 98.0 100.8 Manufacturer Double Vacuum Station V Lw (c)72.7 73.4 69.1 67.3 69.1 74.2 78.0 80.3 83.4 86.2 86.8 Measurement Carrier 50HCQA06 5-ton RTU AC Lw 57.7 66.6 68.7 72.9 74.5 71.1 67.6 62.6 78.1 79.1 Manufacturer Drive-Through Intercom DT Lw (c)A 84.5 84.5 87.7 Manufacturer Eilar Associates, Inc. 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 # Orange, CA 92868 Telephone: (714) 904-2821 # E-mail: bill @ traffic-engineer.com Web: www.traffic-engineer.com March 10, 2022 Soojae Cho c/o KNL Associates, Attn: Justin Kim 3055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 405 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Dear Mr. Cho: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates is pleased to submit this trip generation memo for the 1100 North Tustin Avenue Express Car Wash project in the City of Anaheim. Kunzman Associates has been asked to prepare this analysis to determine the trip generation for the proposed project and to determine if the project could impact any intersections on the City of Anaheim Congestion Management Plan intersection list. This letter summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is located north of La Palma Avenue and east of Tustin Avenue at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim. Figure 1 shows the project location map. The project site currently is occupied by a 15,372 square foot general office building. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of an express car wash facility. The facility is composed of a vehicle queuing area, an express car wash tunnel, vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls, and employee parking stalls. From a traffic engineering point of view, this project is a single tunnel express car wash facility. Figure 2 contains the proposed project site plan. ATTACHMENT NO. 7   EXISTING TRIP GENERATION – INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major change in these variables may affect trip generation rates. Trip generation rates were determined for evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land use. By multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic volumes are determined. Table 1 exhibits the traffic generation rates and peak hour volumes and project daily traffic volumes. The traffic generation rates are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the existing development generates approximately 228 daily vehicle trips, 33 of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 35 of which will occur during the evening peak hour. PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION – INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are predicated on the assumption that energy costs, the availability of roadway capacity, the availability of vehicles to drive, and our life styles remain similar to what we know today. A major change in these variables may affect trip generation rates. Trip generation rates were determined for evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land use. By multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantity, the traffic volumes are determined. Table 2 exhibits the traffic generation rates and peak hour volumes and project daily traffic volumes. The traffic generation rates are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the proposed development is projected to generate approximately 78 vehicle trips during the evening peak hour. PROPOSED TRIP GENERATION – SIMILAR SITE SURVEYS In order to calculate the trip generation rate for the proposed project, four similar facilities were surveyed within the City of Anaheim. In order to qualify as a similar facility, they needed to be in the City of Anaheim, have one car wash tunnel, provide on-site queuing, provide on-site vacuum stalls, and be SIMILAR in operations. From our experience, these types of express car wash facilities are all very similar. Engineering judgment has been used in the selection of similar facilities.   Table 3 shows the selected similar facilities, the summary of the surveys, and Appendix B provides the complete survey data sets. The Drive Thru Express Car Wash located at 590 North Magnolia Avenue was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. The Anaheim Express Wash located at 210 North Euclid Way was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. The Anaheim Express Car Wash located at 2961 West Ball Road was surveyed on 8-13- 2021 and 8-14-2021. Cruizers Express Car Wash located at 1725 South Brookhurst Street was surveyed on 8-13-2021 and 8-14-2021. Based on the similar site surveys, the proposed development is projected to generate approximately 851 daily vehicle trips, 48 of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 86 of which will occur during the evening peak hour. TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Table 4 shows the existing and proposed project trip generation. Based on the trip generation comparison, the proposed development is projected to generate approximately 623 new daily vehicle trips, 15 of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 51 of which will occur during the evening peak hour. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figures 3 and 4 contain the directional distributions of the project traffic for the proposed land use. To determine the traffic distributions for the proposed project, peak hour traffic counts of the existing directional distribution of traffic for existing areas in the vicinity of the site, and other additional information on future development and traffic impacts in the area were reviewed. PROJECT TRIP CONTRIBUTION Figure 5 shows the project trip contributions based on the project trip generation and project trip distribution. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MONITORED INTERSECTIONS Based on the Congestion Management Program list of monitored intersections, there are no Congestion Management Program intersections within the study area that could possibly be impacted. REQUIREMENTS FOR FURTHER ANALYSIS A written analysis, meeting the requirements outlined in the “Traffic Study Content and Format” section of the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, will be required prior to approval in the following cases:   1. When the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicles trips from the proposed development. 2. Project on the Congestion Management Program Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips or adjacent to Congestions Management Program Highway System which generate 2,400 Average Daily Trips. 3. Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the AM of PM peak hours at any Congestion management Program intersection. 4. Any project where variations from the standards and guidelines provided in this manual are being proposed. The project is projected to generate a maximum of 51 new peak hour vehicle trips. No further analysis is required. The project is projected to generate a maximum of 623 daily vehicle trips. No further analysis is required. The project is not projected to contribute 51 or more trips during the peak hours to any Congestion Management Program listed intersection. No further analysis is required. This project does not vary from the guideline standards. No further analysis is required. CONCLUSION The proposed project site is located north of La Palma Avenue and east of Tustin Avenue at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim. The project site currently is occupied by a 15,372 square foot general office building. The proposed project consists of a single tunnel express car wash facility. Based on the trip generation comparison, the proposed development is projected to generate approximately 623 new daily vehicle trips, 15 of which will occur during the morning peak hour and 51 of which will occur during the evening peak hour. Based on the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, no further traffic analysis is required for this project.   It has been a pleasure to service your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 904- 2821. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES Lisa D Kunzman Robert W Kunzman Associate Senior Associate KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES William A Kunzman, P.E. Principal #10073a-4 Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound TotalTrip Generation RatesGeneral Office 1.000 TSF 1.89 0.26 2.15 0.39 1.89 2.28 14.81Trips GeneratedGeneral Office 15.372 TSF 29 4 33 6 29 35 228 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021, Land Use Category 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet.Table 1Existing Development Trip Generation - Institute of Transportation Engineers1Land Use Quantity Units2Peak HourDailyMorning Evening Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound TotalTrip Generation RatesAutomated Car Wash 1 TNL NANANA38.75 38.75 77.50 NATrips GeneratedAutomated Car Wash 1 TNL NANANA39 39 78 NA 1 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition, 2021, Land Use Category 2 TNL = Tunnel.Table 2Proposed Project Trip Generation - Institute of Transportation Engineers1Land Use Quantity Units2Peak HourDailyMorning Evening In Out Total In Out TotalDrive Thru Express Car Wash 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 25 25 50 43 43 86 908Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 16 1531 29 28 57 580Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 151530454590721Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 40 39 79 55 55 110 1,19624 24 48 43 43 86 851Average1Similar sites in the City of Anaheim were surveyed to determine the project trip generation.2Surveyed site data was obtained in September of 2021.Table 3Proposed Project Trip Generation Calculations - Similar Site Surveys1Name AddressPeak Hour2Daily2Morning Evening Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Existing Development1 -29 -4 -33 -6 -29 -35 -228 Proposed Development2 24 24 48 43 43 86 851 Difference -5 20 15 37 14 51 623 1 See Table 1. 2 See Table 3. Table 4 Trip Generation Comparison Description Peak Hour Daily Morning Evening   APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS   GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out).   CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper.   HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles.   PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two trip-ends. A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles.   UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles.   APPENDIX B SIMILAR FACILITY VEHICLE COUNTS Inbound Outbound Total 12:00 AM to 12:15 AM 0 0 0 12:15 AM to 12:30 AM 0 0 0 12:30 AM to 12:45 AM 0 0 0 12:45 AM to 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1:00 AM to 1:15 AM 0 0 0 1:15 AM to 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1:30 AM to 1:45 AM 0 0 0 1:45 AM to 2:00 AM 0 0 0 2:00 AM to 2:15 AM 0 0 0 2:15 AM to 2:30 AM 0 0 0 2:30 AM to 2:45 AM 0 0 0 2:45 AM to 3:00 AM 0 0 0 3:00 AM to 3:15 AM 0 0 0 3:15 AM to 3:30 AM 0 0 0 3:30 AM to 3:45 AM 0 0 0 3:45 AM to 4:00 AM 0 0 0 4:00 AM to 4:15 AM 0 0 0 4:15 AM to 4:30 AM 0 0 0 4:30 AM to 4:45 AM 0 0 0 4:45 AM to 5:00 AM 0 0 0 5:00 AM to 5:15 AM 0 0 0 5:15 AM to 5:30 AM 0 0 0 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM 0 0 0 5:45 AM to 6:00 AM 0 0 0 6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 0 0 0 6:15 AM to 6:30 AM 1 0 1 6:30 AM to 6:45 AM 2 0 2 6:45 AM to 7:00 AM 0 0 0 7:00 AM to 7:15 AM 1 1 2 7:15 AM to 7:30 AM 3 2 5 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM 5 5 10 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM 5 5 10 8:00 AM to 8:15 AM 6 6 12 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM 6 6 12 8:30 AM to 8:45 AM 8 7 15 8:45 AM to 9:00 AM 5 6 11 9:00 AM to 9:15 AM 4 4 8 9:15 AM to 9:30 AM 11 10 21 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM 7 8 15 9:45 AM to 10:00 AM 5 5 10 10:00 AM to 10:15 AM 10 9 19 10:15 AM to 10:30 AM 10 10 20 10:30 AM to 10:45 AM 12 12 24 10:45 AM to 11:00 AM 6 7 13 11:00 AM to 11:15 AM 12 11 23 11:15 AM to 11:30 AM 7 8 15 11:30 AM to 11:45 AM 8 7 15 11:45 AM to 12:00 PM 8 8 16 12:00 PM to 12:15 PM 7 8 15 12:15 PM to 12:30 PM 8 7 15 12:30 PM to 12:45 PM 12 12 24 12:45 PM to 1:00 PM 9 9 18 1:00 PM to 1:15 PM 10 10 20 1:15 PM to 1:30 PM 8 8 16 1:30 PM to 1:45 PM 15 14 29 1:45 PM to 2:00 PM 11 12 23 2:00 PM to 2:15 PM 10 10 20 2:15 PM to 2:30 PM 11 11 22 2:30 PM to 2:45 PM 14 13 27 2:45 PM to 3:00 PM 9 10 19 3:00 PM to 3:15 PM 7 8 15 3:15 PM to 3:30 PM 10 9 19 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM 9 9 18 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM 8 8 16 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 5 6 11 4:15 PM to 4:30 PM 9 8 17 4:30 PM to 4:45 PM 13 12 25 4:45 PM to 5:00 PM 11 12 23 5:00 PM to 5:15 PM 10 10 20 5:15 PM to 5:30 PM 9 9 18 5:30 PM to 5:45 PM 10 10 20 5:45 PM to 6:00 PM 12 12 24 6:00 PM to 6:15 PM 11 11 22 6:15 PM to 6:30 PM 15 14 29 6:30 PM to 6:45 PM 14 14 28 6:45 PM to 7:00 PM 17 17 34 7:00 PM to 7:15 PM 6 8 14 7:15 PM to 7:30 PM 4 4 8 7:30 PM to 7:45 PM 4 4 8 7:45 PM to 8:00 PM 2 3 5 8:00 PM to 8:15 PM 2 2 4 8:15 PM to 8:30 PM 0 1 1 8:30 PM to 8:45 PM 0 1 1 8:45 PM to 9:00 PM 0 1 1 9:00 PM to 9:15 PM 0 0 0 9:15 PM to 9:30 PM 0 0 0 9:30 PM to 9:45 PM 0 0 0 9:45 PM to 10:00 PM 0 0 0 10:00 PM to 10:15 PM 0 0 0 10:15 PM to 10:30 PM 0 0 0 10:30 PM to 10:45 PM 0 0 0 10:45 PM to 11:00 PM 0 0 0 11:00 PM to 11:15 PM 0 0 0 11:15 PM to 11:30 PM 0 0 0 11:30 PM to 11:45 PM 0 0 0 11:45 PM to 12:00 AM 0 0 0 454 454 908 Time Period Daily 9/2/2021 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 Drive Thru Express Car Wash Inbound Outbound Total 12:00 AM to 12:15 AM 0 0 0 12:15 AM to 12:30 AM 0 0 0 12:30 AM to 12:45 AM 0 0 0 12:45 AM to 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1:00 AM to 1:15 AM 0 0 0 1:15 AM to 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1:30 AM to 1:45 AM 0 0 0 1:45 AM to 2:00 AM 0 0 0 2:00 AM to 2:15 AM 0 0 0 2:15 AM to 2:30 AM 0 0 0 2:30 AM to 2:45 AM 0 0 0 2:45 AM to 3:00 AM 0 0 0 3:00 AM to 3:15 AM 0 0 0 3:15 AM to 3:30 AM 0 0 0 3:30 AM to 3:45 AM 0 0 0 3:45 AM to 4:00 AM 0 0 0 4:00 AM to 4:15 AM 0 0 0 4:15 AM to 4:30 AM 0 0 0 4:30 AM to 4:45 AM 0 0 0 4:45 AM to 5:00 AM 0 0 0 5:00 AM to 5:15 AM 0 0 0 5:15 AM to 5:30 AM 0 0 0 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM 0 0 0 5:45 AM to 6:00 AM 0 0 0 6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 0 0 0 6:15 AM to 6:30 AM 1 0 1 6:30 AM to 6:45 AM 1 0 1 6:45 AM to 7:00 AM 1 0 1 7:00 AM to 7:15 AM 0 0 0 7:15 AM to 7:30 AM 3 2 5 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM 0 1 1 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM 4 3 7 8:00 AM to 8:15 AM 0 1 1 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM 7 6 13 8:30 AM to 8:45 AM 3 3 6 8:45 AM to 9:00 AM 3 3 6 9:00 AM to 9:15 AM 3 3 6 9:15 AM to 9:30 AM 1 2 3 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM 5 4 9 9:45 AM to 10:00 AM 2 3 5 10:00 AM to 10:15 AM 4 3 7 10:15 AM to 10:30 AM 6 6 12 10:30 AM to 10:45 AM 4 4 8 10:45 AM to 11:00 AM 6 6 12 11:00 AM to 11:15 AM 6 6 12 11:15 AM to 11:30 AM 6 6 12 11:30 AM to 11:45 AM 6 6 12 11:45 AM to 12:00 PM 5 5 10 12:00 PM to 12:15 PM 7 7 14 12:15 PM to 12:30 PM 4 4 8 12:30 PM to 12:45 PM 4 4 8 12:45 PM to 1:00 PM 12 11 23 1:00 PM to 1:15 PM 9 9 18 1:15 PM to 1:30 PM 8 8 16 1:30 PM to 1:45 PM 7 8 15 1:45 PM to 2:00 PM 14 12 26 2:00 PM to 2:15 PM 8 9 17 2:15 PM to 2:30 PM 8 8 16 2:30 PM to 2:45 PM 2 4 6 2:45 PM to 3:00 PM 8 6 14 3:00 PM to 3:15 PM 11 11 22 3:15 PM to 3:30 PM 6 7 13 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM 6 6 12 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM 9 8 17 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 3 4 7 4:15 PM to 4:30 PM 4 4 8 4:30 PM to 4:45 PM 5 5 10 4:45 PM to 5:00 PM 12 11 23 5:00 PM to 5:15 PM 1 3 4 5:15 PM to 5:30 PM 7 6 13 5:30 PM to 5:45 PM 9 8 17 5:45 PM to 6:00 PM 4 5 9 6:00 PM to 6:15 PM 6 6 12 6:15 PM to 6:30 PM 10 9 19 6:30 PM to 6:45 PM 8 8 16 6:45 PM to 7:00 PM 9 9 18 7:00 PM to 7:15 PM 3 4 7 7:15 PM to 7:30 PM 5 5 10 7:30 PM to 7:45 PM 4 4 8 7:45 PM to 8:00 PM 0 1 1 8:00 PM to 8:15 PM 0 1 1 8:15 PM to 8:30 PM 0 2 2 8:30 PM to 8:45 PM 0 0 0 8:45 PM to 9:00 PM 0 0 0 9:00 PM to 9:15 PM 0 0 0 9:15 PM to 9:30 PM 0 0 0 9:30 PM to 9:45 PM 0 0 0 9:45 PM to 10:00 PM 0 0 0 10:00 PM to 10:15 PM 0 0 0 10:15 PM to 10:30 PM 0 0 0 10:30 PM to 10:45 PM 0 0 0 10:45 PM to 11:00 PM 0 0 0 11:00 PM to 11:15 PM 0 0 0 11:15 PM to 11:30 PM 0 0 0 11:30 PM to 11:45 PM 0 0 0 11:45 PM to 12:00 AM 0 0 0 290 290 580 Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 9/2/2021 Time Period Daily Inbound Outbound Total 12:00 AM to 12:15 AM 0 0 0 12:15 AM to 12:30 AM 0 0 0 12:30 AM to 12:45 AM 0 0 0 12:45 AM to 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1:00 AM to 1:15 AM 0 0 0 1:15 AM to 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1:30 AM to 1:45 AM 0 0 0 1:45 AM to 2:00 AM 0 0 0 2:00 AM to 2:15 AM 0 0 0 2:15 AM to 2:30 AM 0 0 0 2:30 AM to 2:45 AM 0 0 0 2:45 AM to 3:00 AM 0 0 0 3:00 AM to 3:15 AM 0 0 0 3:15 AM to 3:30 AM 0 0 0 3:30 AM to 3:45 AM 0 0 0 3:45 AM to 4:00 AM 0 0 0 4:00 AM to 4:15 AM 0 0 0 4:15 AM to 4:30 AM 0 0 0 4:30 AM to 4:45 AM 0 0 0 4:45 AM to 5:00 AM 0 0 0 5:00 AM to 5:15 AM 0 0 0 5:15 AM to 5:30 AM 0 0 0 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM 0 0 0 5:45 AM to 6:00 AM 0 0 0 6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 2 0 2 6:15 AM to 6:30 AM 0 0 0 6:30 AM to 6:45 AM 0 0 0 6:45 AM to 7:00 AM 2 2 4 7:00 AM to 7:15 AM 0 0 0 7:15 AM to 7:30 AM 1 1 2 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM 2 2 4 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM 4 3 7 8:00 AM to 8:15 AM 5 5 10 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM 2 3 5 8:30 AM to 8:45 AM 3 2 5 8:45 AM to 9:00 AM 5 5 10 9:00 AM to 9:15 AM 4 4 8 9:15 AM to 9:30 AM 8 7 15 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM 6 7 13 9:45 AM to 10:00 AM 14 12 26 10:00 AM to 10:15 AM 7 9 16 10:15 AM to 10:30 AM 6 6 12 10:30 AM to 10:45 AM 5 5 10 10:45 AM to 11:00 AM 4 4 8 11:00 AM to 11:15 AM 9 8 17 11:15 AM to 11:30 AM 0 2 2 11:30 AM to 11:45 AM 6 5 11 11:45 AM to 12:00 PM 5 5 10 12:00 PM to 12:15 PM 4 4 8 12:15 PM to 12:30 PM 6 6 12 12:30 PM to 12:45 PM 5 5 10 12:45 PM to 1:00 PM 9 8 17 1:00 PM to 1:15 PM 9 9 18 1:15 PM to 1:30 PM 3 4 7 1:30 PM to 1:45 PM 6 6 12 1:45 PM to 2:00 PM 13 11 24 2:00 PM to 2:15 PM 9 10 19 2:15 PM to 2:30 PM 4 5 9 2:30 PM to 2:45 PM 10 9 19 2:45 PM to 3:00 PM 10 10 20 3:00 PM to 3:15 PM 13 12 25 3:15 PM to 3:30 PM 8 9 17 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM 8 8 16 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM 11 11 22 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 7 8 15 4:15 PM to 4:30 PM 5 5 10 4:30 PM to 4:45 PM 12 11 23 4:45 PM to 5:00 PM 12 12 24 5:00 PM to 5:15 PM 15 14 29 5:15 PM to 5:30 PM 6 8 14 5:30 PM to 5:45 PM 11 10 21 5:45 PM to 6:00 PM 11 11 22 6:00 PM to 6:15 PM 11 11 22 6:15 PM to 6:30 PM 7 8 15 6:30 PM to 6:45 PM 8 7 15 6:45 PM to 7:00 PM 8 8 16 7:00 PM to 7:15 PM 14 13 27 7:15 PM to 7:30 PM 3 5 8 7:30 PM to 7:45 PM 1 2 3 7:45 PM to 8:00 PM 1 1 2 8:00 PM to 8:15 PM 0 2 2 8:15 PM to 8:30 PM 0 1 1 8:30 PM to 8:45 PM 0 0 0 8:45 PM to 9:00 PM 0 0 0 9:00 PM to 9:15 PM 0 0 0 9:15 PM to 9:30 PM 0 0 0 9:30 PM to 9:45 PM 0 0 0 9:45 PM to 10:00 PM 0 0 0 10:00 PM to 10:15 PM 0 0 0 10:15 PM to 10:30 PM 0 0 0 10:30 PM to 10:45 PM 0 0 0 10:45 PM to 11:00 PM 0 0 0 11:00 PM to 11:15 PM 0 0 0 11:15 PM to 11:30 PM 0 0 0 11:30 PM to 11:45 PM 0 0 0 11:45 PM to 12:00 AM 0 0 0 360 361 721 Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 9/2/2021 Time Period Daily Inbound Outbound Total 12:00 AM to 12:15 AM 0 0 0 12:15 AM to 12:30 AM 0 0 0 12:30 AM to 12:45 AM 0 0 0 12:45 AM to 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1:00 AM to 1:15 AM 0 0 0 1:15 AM to 1:30 AM 0 0 0 1:30 AM to 1:45 AM 0 0 0 1:45 AM to 2:00 AM 0 0 0 2:00 AM to 2:15 AM 0 0 0 2:15 AM to 2:30 AM 0 0 0 2:30 AM to 2:45 AM 0 0 0 2:45 AM to 3:00 AM 0 0 0 3:00 AM to 3:15 AM 0 0 0 3:15 AM to 3:30 AM 0 0 0 3:30 AM to 3:45 AM 0 0 0 3:45 AM to 4:00 AM 0 0 0 4:00 AM to 4:15 AM 0 0 0 4:15 AM to 4:30 AM 0 0 0 4:30 AM to 4:45 AM 0 0 0 4:45 AM to 5:00 AM 0 0 0 5:00 AM to 5:15 AM 0 0 0 5:15 AM to 5:30 AM 0 0 0 5:30 AM to 5:45 AM 0 0 0 5:45 AM to 6:00 AM 0 0 0 6:00 AM to 6:15 AM 1 0 1 6:15 AM to 6:30 AM 2 0 2 6:30 AM to 6:45 AM 0 0 0 6:45 AM to 7:00 AM 0 0 0 7:00 AM to 7:15 AM 5 4 9 7:15 AM to 7:30 AM 7 7 14 7:30 AM to 7:45 AM 6 6 12 7:45 AM to 8:00 AM 9 8 17 8:00 AM to 8:15 AM 11 11 22 8:15 AM to 8:30 AM 12 12 24 8:30 AM to 8:45 AM 8 8 16 8:45 AM to 9:00 AM 3 4 7 9:00 AM to 9:15 AM 6 6 12 9:15 AM to 9:30 AM 10 9 19 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM 13 12 25 9:45 AM to 10:00 AM 14 14 28 10:00 AM to 10:15 AM 11 12 23 10:15 AM to 10:30 AM 14 13 27 10:30 AM to 10:45 AM 14 14 28 10:45 AM to 11:00 AM 5 7 12 11:00 AM to 11:15 AM 12 11 23 11:15 AM to 11:30 AM 14 13 27 11:30 AM to 11:45 AM 13 13 26 11:45 AM to 12:00 PM 11 12 23 12:00 PM to 12:15 PM 13 12 25 12:15 PM to 12:30 PM 10 11 21 12:30 PM to 12:45 PM 14 13 27 12:45 PM to 1:00 PM 10 11 21 1:00 PM to 1:15 PM 13 12 25 1:15 PM to 1:30 PM 14 14 28 1:30 PM to 1:45 PM 11 12 23 1:45 PM to 2:00 PM 12 12 24 2:00 PM to 2:15 PM 14 13 27 2:15 PM to 2:30 PM 11 12 23 2:30 PM to 2:45 PM 11 11 22 2:45 PM to 3:00 PM 14 13 27 3:00 PM to 3:15 PM 14 14 28 3:15 PM to 3:30 PM 12 13 25 3:30 PM to 3:45 PM 13 12 25 3:45 PM to 4:00 PM 14 14 28 4:00 PM to 4:15 PM 13 13 26 4:15 PM to 4:30 PM 15 15 30 4:30 PM to 4:45 PM 12 13 25 4:45 PM to 5:00 PM 13 12 25 5:00 PM to 5:15 PM 15 15 30 5:15 PM to 5:30 PM 11 12 23 5:30 PM to 5:45 PM 10 10 20 5:45 PM to 6:00 PM 12 12 24 6:00 PM to 6:15 PM 13 12 25 6:15 PM to 6:30 PM 13 13 26 6:30 PM to 6:45 PM 16 16 32 6:45 PM to 7:00 PM 9 10 19 7:00 PM to 7:15 PM 14 13 27 7:15 PM to 7:30 PM 11 12 23 7:30 PM to 7:45 PM 14 13 27 7:45 PM to 8:00 PM 6 8 14 8:00 PM to 8:15 PM 0 1 1 8:15 PM to 8:30 PM 0 0 0 8:30 PM to 8:45 PM 0 3 3 8:45 PM to 9:00 PM 0 0 0 9:00 PM to 9:15 PM 0 0 0 9:15 PM to 9:30 PM 0 0 0 9:30 PM to 9:45 PM 0 0 0 9:45 PM to 10:00 PM 0 0 0 10:00 PM to 10:15 PM 0 0 0 10:15 PM to 10:30 PM 0 0 0 10:30 PM to 10:45 PM 0 0 0 10:45 PM to 11:00 PM 0 0 0 11:00 PM to 11:15 PM 0 0 0 11:15 PM to 11:30 PM 0 0 0 11:30 PM to 11:45 PM 0 0 0 11:45 PM to 12:00 AM 0 0 0 598 598 1196 Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 9/2/2021 Time Period Daily 1111 Town & Country Road, Suite 34 # Orange, CA 92868 Telephone: (714) 904-2821 # E-mail: bill @ traffic-engineer.com Web: www.traffic-engineer.com March 4, 2022 Soojae Cho c/o KNL Associates, Attn: Justin Kim 3055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 405 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Dear Mr. Cho: INTRODUCTION The firm of Kunzman Associates is pleased to submit this queuing analysis for the 1100 North Tustin Avenue Express Car Wash project in the City of Anaheim. Kunzman Associates has been asked to prepare this analysis to determine if adequate queuing is provided on-site. This letter summarizes our methodology, analysis, and findings. Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary of terms is provided within Appendix A. PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is located north of La Palma Avenue and east of Tustin Avenue at 1100 North Tustin Avenue in the City of Anaheim. Figure 1 shows the project location map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of an express car wash facility. The facility is composed of a vehicle queuing area, an express car wash tunnel, vehicle drying/vacuuming parking stalls, and employee parking stalls. From a traffic engineering point of view, this project is a single tunnel express car wash facility. Figure 2 contains the proposed project site plan. The proposed project is proposing to provide 13 vehicle queuing positions. ATTACHMENT NO. 8   EXPRESS CAR WASH SURVEYS In order to calculate the vehicle queuing demand for the proposed project, four similar facilities were surveyed within the City of Anaheim. In order to qualify as a similar facility, they needed to be in the City of Anaheim, have one car wash tunnel, provide on-site queuing, provide on-site vacuum stalls, and be SIMILAR in operations. From our experience, these types of express car wash facilities are all very similar. Engineering judgment has been used in the selection of similar facilities. Based on our experience with express car wash facilities, the peak periods are Friday from 12:00 Noon to 6:00 PM and Saturday from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Each facility is surveyed every 15 minutes. During each survey, the number of parked vehicles for drying/vacuuming and employees are counted. Also, the queue is observed. The queue includes all vehicles in line between the entrance and the tunnel entrance. Table 2 shows the selected similar facilities, the summary of the surveys, and Appendix B provides the complete survey data sets. Drive Thru Express Car Wash located at 590 North Magnolia Avenue was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. Anaheim Express Wash located at 210 North Euclid Way was surveyed on 8-6-2021 and 8-7-2021. Anaheim Express Car Wash located at 2961 West Ball Road was surveyed on 8-13-2021 and 8-14-2021. Cruizers Express Car Wash located at 1725 South Brookhurst Street was surveyed on 8-13-2021 and 8-14-2021. QUEUING ANALYSIS Based on the data collected from four similar facilities, the minimum peak vehicle queue of 3 was observed, the average peak vehicle queue of was observed, and the maximum peak vehicle queue of 16 was observed. The proposed express car wash should provide 8 vehicle queuing spaces. This exceeds The proposed project will provide 13 vehicle queuing positions. 8 the average observed vehicle queuing requirements. observed vehicle queuing requirements.   either go to another car wash or they will come back later. Express car washes are a convenience. If it is not convenient, patrons will not utilize the service. It has been a pleasure to service your needs on this project. Should you have any questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 904- 2821. Sincerely, KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES Lisa D Kunzman Robert W Kunzman Associate Senior Associate KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES William A Kunzman, P.E. Principal #10073a-7 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 TotalDrive Thru Express Car Wash 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 4 2 0 6 4 4Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 16 3 019 3 4Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 855185 6Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 5 0 0 5 12 1612 6 81See Appendix B for raw survey data.Table 1Name LocationQueue CapacityCountMaximum QueueFriday SaturdayExpress Car Wash Survey SummaryAverage N JN 10073a Figure 1 Project Location Map Kunzman Associates Over 40 Years of Excellent ServiceTustin AvenueLa Palma Avenue Site   APPENDIX A GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS   GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AC: Acres ADT: Average Daily Traffic Caltrans: California Department of Transportation DU: Dwelling Unit ICU: Intersection Capacity Utilization LOS: Level of Service TSF: Thousand Square Feet V/C: Volume/Capacity VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled TERMS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of days in a year. Usually, only weekdays are included. BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a signal progression. BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that can proceed downstream from its location. CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles that can be reasonably expected to pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period. CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all- red interval after the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval. CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other items are counted (in and out).   CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle. CUL-DE-SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions for turning around. DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway. DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle. DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic-actuated signal. DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile. DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting impulse to the signal controller. DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed. DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time. DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion. FORCED FLOW: Opposite of free flow. FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and travel is unimpeded by other traffic. GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to front bumper.   HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, front bumper to front bumper. INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to achieve signal progression. LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort and convenience, and operating costs. LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure when passed over by a vehicle. MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge. MULTI-MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid transit, and bicycle transportation modes. OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection. PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind. ORIGIN-DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the point of destination for a given vehicle trip. PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car Equivalent than empty trucks. PEAK HOUR: The 60 consecutive minutes with the highest number of vehicles.   PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions. Also, fixed time signal. PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through several signalized intersections. SCREEN-LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted, normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models. SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of signal indications. SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic movements. STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection. TRAFFIC-ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors. TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another (destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one. TRIP-END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e., each trip has two trip-ends. A trip-end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or from a vehicle. TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quantity of trips produced and/or attracted by a specific land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square feet of floor space. TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two axles.   UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom balanced in an urban area. VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles.   APPENDIX B EXPRESS CAR WASH VEHICLE QUEUING SURVEYS Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 8 1 10:15 AM 2 6 2 10:30 AM 2 13 1 10:45 AM 3 14 2 11:00 AM 2 12 1 11:15 AM 2 15 1 11:30 AM 3 8 4 11:45 AM 3 9 3 12:00 PM 2 5 1 2 7 1 12:15 PM 2 7 2 2 13 1 12:30 PM 2 7 3 2 15 2 12:45 PM 2 9 3 2 13 2 1:00 PM 2 6 3 2 12 3 1:15 PM 2 7 1 2 9 3 1:30 PM 2 6 1 2 10 3 1:45 PM 2 4 1 2 6 3 2:00 PM 2 8 2 2 8 2 2:15 PM 2 6 3 2 11 1 2:30 PM 2 7 3 2 15 4 2:45 PM 2 9 2 2 14 2 3:00 PM 2 5 2 2 12 3 3:15 PM 2 7 2 2 13 3 3:30 PM 2 9 3 2 14 2 3:45 PM 2 11 4 2 6 2 4:00 PM 2 10 1 2 8 1 4:15 PM 2 12 2 4:30 PM 2 9 1 4:45 PM 2 11 2 5:00 PM 2 12 2 5:15 PM 3 8 1 5:30 PM 2 10 1 5:45 PM 2 5 1 6:00 PM 2 9 1 Drive Thru Express Car Wash 590 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801 8/06/2021, 8/07/2021 Day Time Queue Friday Parked Vehicles Parked Vehicles Queue Saturday Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 5 3 10:15 AM 2 4 1 10:30 AM 2 7 1 10:45 AM 2 6 2 11:00 AM 2 9 1 11:15 AM 2 5 1 11:30 AM 2 4 1 11:45 AM 2 8 1 12:00 PM 2 9 2 2 9 1 12:15 PM 2 8 3 2 11 2 12:30 PM 2 4 2 2 4 3 12:45 PM 2 5 2 2 10 2 1:00 PM 2 4 2 2 7 1 1:15 PM 2 4 2 2 7 1 1:30 PM 2 5 1 2 9 2 1:45 PM 2 6 3 2 10 1 2:00 PM 2 10 3 2 13 2 2:15 PM 2 10 3 2 5 3 2:30 PM 2 8 3 2 7 3 2:45 PM 2 4 2 2 11 4 3:00 PM 3 7 2 2 11 3 3:15 PM 3 8 1 2 7 4 3:30 PM 3 6 3 2 10 3 3:45 PM 3 6 2 2 9 1 4:00 PM 3 9 2 2 7 2 4:15 PM 3 12 3 4:30 PM 3 3 1 4:45 PM 3 5 2 5:00 PM 3 5 2 5:15 PM 2 6 2 5:30 PM 2 6 1 5:45 PM 2 6 1 6:00 PM 2 7 3 Queue Anaheim Express Wash 210 North Euclid Way, Anaheim, CA 92801 8/06/2021, 8/07/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 3 10 1 10:15 AM 3 12 1 10:30 AM 3 15 2 10:45 AM 3 18 0 11:00 AM 3 22 1 11:15 AM 3 20 0 11:30 AM 3 22 0 11:45 AM 3 19 1 12:00 PM 3 7 0 3 8 3 12:15 PM 3 9 0 3 9 3 12:30 PM 3 8 0 3 14 4 12:45 PM 3 8 1 3 21 2 1:00 PM 3 8 1 3 17 4 1:15 PM 3 6 0 3 19 4 1:30 PM 3 7 3 3 15 6 1:45 PM 3 11 0 2 14 0 2:00 PM 2 11 0 2 13 0 2:15 PM 2 9 0 2 14 0 2:30 PM 2 7 0 3 13 1 2:45 PM 2 9 2 3 9 1 3:00 PM 2 9 0 3 14 2 3:15 PM 2 9 0 3 8 0 3:30 PM 2 7 0 3 7 1 3:45 PM 2 11 2 3 11 0 4:00 PM 2 13 0 3 15 1 4:15 PM 2 14 3 4:30 PM 2 15 2 4:45 PM 2 16 0 5:00 PM 2 16 5 5:15 PM 2 17 4 5:30 PM 2 19 0 5:45 PM 2 11 0 6:00 PM 2 12 0 Queue Anaheim Express Car Wash 2961 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92804 8/13/2021, 8/14/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles Employees Patrons Employees Patrons 10:00 AM 2 14 8 10:15 AM 2 15 12 10:30 AM 2 15 15 10:45 AM 2 15 14 11:00 AM 2 15 10 11:15 AM 2 15 7 11:30 AM 2 13 8 11:45 AM 2 15 10 12:00 PM 2 10 9 2 15 16 12:15 PM 2 12 11 2 12 10 12:30 PM 2 15 7 2 13 14 12:45 PM 2 15 9 2 15 10 1:00 PM 2 14 4 2 15 11 1:15 PM 2 13 8 2 14 7 1:30 PM 2 14 11 2 14 8 1:45 PM 2 13 10 2 15 11 2:00 PM 2 14 4 2 13 8 2:15 PM 2 11 3 2 14 9 2:30 PM 2 14 7 2 15 11 2:45 PM 2 15 12 2 15 10 3:00 PM 2 13 10 2 14 6 3:15 PM 2 11 7 2 15 8 3:30 PM 2 15 10 2 13 7 3:45 PM 2 14 8 2 15 9 4:00 PM 2 15 3 2 14 4 4:15 PM 2 15 1 4:30 PM 2 12 3 4:45 PM 2 10 4 5:00 PM 2 12 5 5:15 PM 2 9 2 5:30 PM 2 8 0 5:45 PM 2 12 2 6:00 PM 2 8 1 Queue Cruizers Express Car Wash 1725 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, CA 92804 8/13/2021, 8/14/2021 Time Day Friday Saturday Parked Vehicles Queue Parked Vehicles E LA PALMA AVE N TUSTIN AVEE LA PALMA AVE N TUSTIN AVEE EAGLE DR N OSPREY CIRE MELVILLE WAY N LINKN JEFFERSON FRONTAGE RD E. MIRALOMA AVEN.TUSTI NA V EN. M ILLER STE.LAPA L M A AVE E .R I V E R D A L E A V E E. LA PAL M A A V E 1100 North Tustin Avenue DEV No. 2021-00126 Subject Property APN: 346-142-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 SP 2015-1 DA1 DEV 2011-00125 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA1 CANYON GATE PLAZA SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 RETAIL SP 2015-1 DA1 SERVICE STATION SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA1 SIMON GREEN LEAR EXECUTIVE OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA6 O.C.F.C.D. SP 2015-1 DA3 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA3 OFFICES SP 2015-1 DA3 PACIFIC CENTER SP 2015-1 DA3 Fa st Food Restaurant SP 2015-1 DA3 Fa st Food Restaurant SP 2015-1 DA3 Retail SP 2015-1 DA1 CANYON GATE PLAZA SP 2015-1 DA1 CANYON GATE PLAZA SP 2015-1 DA1 CANYON GATE PLAZASP 2015-1 DA1 CANYON GATE PLAZA SP 2015-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 2015-1 DA6 O.C.F.C.D. SP 2015-1 DA6 O.C.F.C.D. SP 2015-1 DA3 OFFICES E LA PALMA AVE N TUSTIN AVEE LA PALMA AVE N TUSTIN AVEE EAG LE DR N OSPREY CIRE MELVILLE WAY N LINKE. MIRALO MA AVEN.TUSTI NA V EN. MI LLER STE.LAPA L M A AVE E .R I V E R D A L E A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E 1 1 0 0 No r t h Tu s t in Ave n u e D E V N o . 2 0 2 1 -0 0 12 6 Subject Property APN: 346-142-04 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Pho to: May 20 21 ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131 (FINAL SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) LOCATION: The subject property is approximately 4.3 acres, located at the southeast corner of South Union Street and East Park Street (A-Town Development Area F). APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is PT Metro, LLC represented by Vivian Extale, and the agent is Ted Frattone from Hunsaker and Associates. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a final site plan to construct 73 residential dwelling units (for-sale) in Development Area F of the Lennar A-Town development in the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior structural setback and to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach into the required setback between buildings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions, determining that the previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 and associated Addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, and approving Development Permit No. 2021-00131. BACKGROUND: The 43.1-acre A-Town Metro Project (A-Town) site is located in the Industrial (I) Zone and the PTMU Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates this property for Mixed Use and Park land uses. The subject property is surrounded by vacant land to the north; office uses and vacant land to the east; industrial uses to the south; and park uses to the west. A-Town was originally approved by the City Council on October 25, 2005. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 9 The A-Town project was revised and subsequently approved by the City Council on October 20, 2015. The revised project permits development of between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units and between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks, and a network of local streets within the eight Development Areas. Final site plans for five of the eight A-Town Development Areas have been approved by the Planning Commission in recent years, with one Development Area completed, two under construction, and two in plan check. The final two Development Areas will be presented to the Planning Commission for review at a future date. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing a single-family attached development in Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan. The proposed development would consist of 73 residential dwelling units within 17 single-family attached residential buildings. The project will consist of three-story buildings in an attached townhome design. There will be two building types in the project with the first consisting of four units and the second consisting of five units. Each building type will include three and four-bedroom units. The overall project unit mix will consist of 39 three-bedroom units and 34 four-bedroom units. Residential dwelling units will range in size from approximately 1,675 square feet to 2,399 square feet. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 9 The project will provide 217 vehicular parking spaces within enclosed garages and on-site surface parking spaces. Of these spaces, 146 parking spaces will be provided within private two- car garages and 71 parking spaces will be on-site surface spaces, including four ADA parking spaces. Vehicular access to the project site will be provided with three driveways, two along Park Street and a third along Union Street. All three driveways connect to the project site's main private access drive, which provides access to all of the open and enclosed parking spaces. Seven residential buildings along the perimeter of the project site will have direct garage access from the main private access drive. Ten residential buildings, located at the interior of the project site, will have access from five smaller alley drives off the primary drive. The applicant is proposing four different building elevations with two distinct architectural styles to distinguish the project site and provide its own unique features within the A-Town Project. The structures fronting Union Street and Park Street consist of landscaping, front-yard patios, raised entry stoops, and balconies to maintain active street frontages and provide for a walkable urban environment. The building design includes façade articulation, architectural details, varied rooflines, and different building materials and colors. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 9 The proposed project includes ground-mounted utility facilities within the interior five-foot structural setback along the southerly property line. These facilities include a fire department connection and a combined domestic water meter and backflow prevention device for water supply. The PTMU Overlay Zone allows modifications to these setback requirements through the approval of a CUP. Staff further describes and analyzes this request in the “Findings and Analysis” section of this staff report. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Master Site Plan: The City Council approved the A-Town Master Site Plan in 2015 in conjunction with its approval of the amended and restated development agreement. The Master Site Plan established eight Development Areas (A through H) in the plan. The Code requires review and approval of final site plans to implement the individual mixed-use or residential projects within each Development Area of the Master Site Plan. The Planning Commission must review and approve these final site plans at noticed public hearings prior to the issuance of building permits. The Master Site Plan includes a minimum and maximum development range for the build-out of the A-Town Metro project. This range allows the development of a minimum of 1,400 residential units and a maximum of 1,746 residential units within the eight Development Areas. Each Development Area has a target density range for the minimum and maximum number of residential units permitted. Each Development Area can develop within that density range, provided the total units in the Master Site Plan does not go below the minimum or above the maximum number of units. The density range for Area F is 70-132 dwelling units. The proposed project (73 units) is within this density range. Parking: Parking for the proposed project will comply with the Code requirements that were in place at the time the Council approved the development agreement for the A-Town Master Site Plan. The Code at that time required a minimum of 217 parking spaces for the residential units, and the project will provide 217 residential parking spaces. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 5 of 9 The City Council has subsequently adopted higher parking requirements for the Platinum Triangle that are consistent with the parking requirements for multiple-family housing throughout the City; however, the approved development agreement “locks in” the Code requirements in place at the time of the approval of the development agreement. Final Site Plan: Before the Planning Commission may approve a final site plan application, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the development standards of the applicable zoning district, and any special area guidelines or policies; 2) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood; 4) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants, visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained; and 5) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed final site plan was designed to be consistent with the General Plan, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and the A-Town Master Site Plan. The project's site design incorporates the following features to comply with the design standards of the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, and the A-Town Master Site Plan and to provide a vibrant walkable community with high quality landscaping and architecture: • The proposed project includes a privately operated pocket park with an open lawn area, benches, and a decorative trellis structure with tables at the corner of Union Street and Park Street. This pocket park will provide additional open space for residents of the project as well as nearby residents and will complement the City park space at Aloe Greens Park. • The proposed project will include architectural features along the street frontage that will further activate the street to create a vibrant, urban, and walkable environment. This includes private patios, raised unit entryways, balconies, and street facing windows. • The proposed project will provide a private recreation center with amenities for the residents of the project to enjoy active recreation and a space to host parties as well as informal gatherings. The recreation center will include a pool, spa, sun deck, restrooms, and a parcel room. • The proposed project will include a distinct building at the corner of Meridian Street and Union Street that will serve as view termination for Meridian Street, as required by the A- Town Master Site Plan. The distinct building massing will include additional height, larger DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 6 of 9 windows, varying colors, and a mid-century modern architectural style. This building will complement the view termination provided at the opposite end of Meridian Street by the existing apartment project within Development Area A. The layout of the development is compatible with the street configuration of the A-Town Master Site Plan and with the adjacent residential to the west and future residential properties to the north. The project's architectural style is compatible with the surrounding environment and development, while distinguishing the site with its own unique features to create a sense of place within the Platinum Triangle. Staff believes that this residential project would not interfere with the use or enjoyment of the neighboring existing and future developments and would create additional homeownership opportunities within the Platinum Triangle. For these reasons staff recommends approval of the final site plan. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior structural setback along the southern property line and to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach into the required setback between buildings. The utility facilities include a fire department connection and a combined domestic water meter and backflow prevention device for water supply. The Code requires a minimum structural setback along the interior property line of five feet. The applicant is proposing to locate the utility facilities with zero setback from the property line. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach one additional foot into the required setback between buildings to accommodate larger private patio areas for the residents. The Zoning Code allows for five-foot ground-floor private residential patios between buildings and the applicant is proposing six-foot ground-floor private residential patios. These ground-floor private residential patios are located interior to the site along the primary pedestrian entry to the residential units. Before the Planning Commission may approve a CUP, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a CUP is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the CUP under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 7 of 9 Additionally, pursuant to Code section 18.20.090.050 (Modifications) the approval of a modification to prescribed setbacks requires the following finding of fact: 1) The proposed use meets the minimum landscape requirements. The following figure depicts the proposed modification to allow ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior structural setback: Setback Modification at Interior Property Line In accordance with the required findings for a CUP, staff believes that the proposed utility encroachments would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, as the encroachments are not adjacent to an existing building and will be landscaped. Locating the utility facilities along the southerly property line allows for the full development of the site and would not be detrimental to the health or safety of the residents. The utility encroachments would not have any effect on the traffic generated by the proposed project and would not impose a burden on the streets in the development. Staff believes that the proposed utility encroachments would further the objectives of the PTMU Overlay Zone by locating large utility devices away from the primary street frontage and within an underutilized portion of the property. This further contributes to an attractive and walkable urban environment by locating utility facilities in areas away from heavy pedestrian traffic. Landscaping will also be provided between the utility devices and the street frontage along Union Street. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior structural setback. DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 8 of 9 The following figure depicts the proposed modification to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach one additional foot into the required setback between buildings to accommodate larger private patio areas for the residents: Private Patio Setback Modification between Buildings In accordance with the required findings for a CUP, staff believes that the private patio encroachments would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, as the encroachments are limited to open private patio areas and there will be no enclosed structures. The private patio encroachment allows for the full development of the site and would not be detrimental to the health or safety of the residents. The private patio encroachments would not have any effect on the traffic generated by the proposed project and would not impose a burden on the streets in the development. Staff believes that the proposed private patio encroachments would further the objectives of the PTMU Overlay Zone by providing larger private patio areas for the residents while maintaining the balance of landscape and architecture by providing enhanced landscaping within the remaining landscaped area. The Code requires 40% of the setback between buildings to be landscaped. While the expanded private patios reduce the overall landscaped area, the plans indicate the remaining landscape area provides the minimum 40% required by Code. The finding can be made that the proposed modification meets the minimum landscape requirements. For these reasons, staff recommends DEV2021-00131 (AREA F) July 6, 2022 Page 9 of 9 approval of the conditional use permit to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach one additional foot into the required setback between buildings. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 and associated Addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request. An environmental checklist (Attachment No. 6) was prepared to determine that the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339, and subsequent addenda, adequately analyzed the anticipated effects of the proposed project; and, that the approved mitigation measures are appropriate for the project. CONCLUSION: The proposed development is a carefully designed and planned project that addresses the current and projected market conditions while continuing the implementation of the A-Town Master Site Plan. The project also conforms to the PTMLUP and PTMU Overlay Zone, and staff believes that the proposed development would be an appropriate addition to the Platinum Triangle. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Lisandro Orozco Scott Koehm Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Final Site Plan Resolution 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Final Site Plan Exhibit 4. Letter of Request 5. FSEIR No. 339 and Addenda 6. Environmental Checklist For EIR 339 - Area F 7. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A FINAL SITE PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT AREA 'F' OF THE MASTER SITE PLAN APPROVED IN CONNECTION WITH THAT CERTAIN AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008C, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131) (FINAL SITE PLAN) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet - 2 - PC2022-*** of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, also on October 25, 2005 and in response to the application of Lennar Platinum Triangle, LLC (“Original Developer”), Don H. Watson, Trustee of the Don H. Watson Family Trust, Julius Realty Corporation, Traffic Control Services, Inc., Joselito D. Ong and Renee Dee Ong, Roger C. Treichler and Vicki Treichler, as Co-Trustees of the Treichler Family Trust, the Robert Stovall Family Partnership, L.P. and Jennifer Leonard and Linda Gaffney, as tenants in common (collectively referred to herein, along with the Original Developer, as the "Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of up to 2,681 residences with a mix of housing types, including high rise residential towers, street townhomes, podium townhomes and lofts, with 150,000 square feet of street-related retail commercial development, public park space - 3 - PC2022-*** and associated infrastructure to be developed in four phases (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 43 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the south, and Katella Avenue on the north (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 332, a revision to the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to add new mitigation measure MM 5.10-7 thereto, and an Addendum to FSEIR No. 332, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 138, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00434, to amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to re-designate an approximately 10.4-acre site from the "Office-High" land use designation to the "Mixed-Use" land use designation; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00111 to amend the PTMLUP to incorporate an approximately 10.4-acre site into the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone; (3) Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00116 to rescind, in part, City Council Resolution No. 2004-00008 pertaining to Reclassification No. 2004-00127; (4) Reclassification No. 2005- 00164, to reclassify an approximately 10.4-acre site from the "I" Industrial Zone to the PTMU Overlay Zone, meaning that the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone shall apply to the Property in addition to and, where inconsistent therewith, shall supersede any regulations of the "I" Industrial Zone; (5) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2005-00042, to incorporate an approximately 10.4-acre site into the Platinum Triangle; (5) Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-04999, permitting residential tower structures up to 400 feet in height on a portion of the Property; (6) Development Agreement No. 2005-0008; and (7) Tentative Tract Map No. 16859 for condominium purposes (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about November 8, 2005, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on December 13, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005000992876 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, in reliance on the Original Development Approvals, the Original Developer constructed certain improvements on and about the Property in accordance with the design of Tract Map No. 16859; and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and - 4 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years and for revisions to the "Term Extension Milestones" was approved by the City Council on December 16, 2008. Accordingly, on or about January 21, 2009, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on February 23, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009000081175 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and - 5 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005- 11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to PT Metro, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to the Existing Entitlements for a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A- Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and - 6 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to Amendment No. 1 of the Original Development Agreement to correspond with the changes to the Existing Entitlements was approved by the City Council on October 20, 2015. Accordingly, on or about October 27, 2015, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-00008, which was recorded in the Official Records on November 13, 2015 as Instrument No. 2015000586936 (“Amended and Restated Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement to amend the Exhibit “G” Term Extension Milestones relative to the timing and completion of residential units within the 5-year and 7.5-year anniversary periods was approved by the City Council on June 12, 2018. Accordingly, on or about June 21, 2018, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on May 3, 2019 as Instrument No. 2019000148064 (“Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement, Amendment No. 1, Amended and Restated Development Agreement, and Amendment No.1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement, the Original Development Approvals, General Plan Amendment No. 2013-00490, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00598, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2013-00112, Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005- 00008C, the Master Site Plan, and Tentative Tract Map No. 17703, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated June 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 17.5-acre (approximate) property located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way to permit 1,079 residential units, including 12 live/work units; 14,600 square feet of commercial space; a 1.1-acre public park; and, local streets (the "Jefferson Stadium Park Project"). On June 21, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6373 to approve a Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. to develop the Jefferson Stadium Park Project with a (1) General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use, Green and Circulation Elements of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the proposed public park and proposed street alignment, (2) amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to reconfigure internal streets, reflect the relocation of a proposed park, and designate areas currently assigned for park use for mixed-use development, and (3) a tentative parcel map to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and a public park to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2016 ("Addendum No. 6"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with a proposed master planned mixed-use project on a 14.8-acre (approximate) property located at the northeast corner of State College Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue to permit 405 residential units; 77,000 square feet of office; and 583,000 square feet of commercial uses including a 200-room hotel (the "LT Platinum Center Project"). On October 25, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6387 to - 7 - PC2022-*** approve a Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and LTG Platinum LLC, to develop the LT Platinum Center Project with a (1) General Plan Amendment to revise Table LU- 4, General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City, to modify the density provisions for properties within the Platinum Triangle area that are designated for mixed-use land use, to reduce the maximum number of dwelling units from 19,027 to 17,348 units; to increase the maximum square feet of commercial space from 4,735,111 to 4,782,243; and, to reduce the maximum of amount of office space from 9,652,747 to 9,180,747 square feet. In addition, modifications to the Land Use Plan (Figure LU-4), Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities (Figure C-5) and Green Plan (Figure G‐5) of the Anaheim General Plan are required in order to remove the designation of a public park on the project site, (2) amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to revise the district boundaries for the Stadium and Gateway Districts; allow a reduction, conversion and transfer of unused development intensity from the Gateway, Gene Autry, Katella, and Orangewood Districts to the Stadium District; revise development intensities consistent with the transfers and reductions described above, and modify the park and street locations consistent with the proposed project, (3) a conditional use permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages at various venues within the LT Platinum project; (4) a tentative tract map to subdivide the project site into two parcels that correspond to the two Development Areas shown on the proposed Master Site Plan for the project; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 to FSEIR No. 339, dated March 2017 (“Addendum No. 7”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard Improvement Projects to widen Gene Autry Way from four lanes to six lanes with medians and storm drain and stormwater improvements; widen the west side of State College Boulevard between Gateway Office and Artisan Court to accommodate a southbound right‐turn lane and a third through‐ lane; make improvements to the east side of the intersection of State College Boulevard at Gene Autry Way, which is the west entrance to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; and construct a new intersection on Gene Autry Way at Union Street to provide access to planned development areas; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 8 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 10, 2018, (“Addendum No. 8”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project which included roadway improvements specified in the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP). The Approved Project included the widening of Orangewood Avenue from a four‐lane divided primary arterial to a six‐lane divided primary arterial between State College Boulevard and State Route 57 (SR‐57). It also included an extension of the Class II Bikeway on Orangewood Avenue from east of State College Boulevard to the eastern City limit (via West Dupont Drive and private properties); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 9 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 17, 2022, (“Addendum No. 9”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the widening of Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access; incorporate an additional westbound through lane; and widen the existing Orangewood Avenue bridge structure over the Santa Ana River. It also included a change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, and amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map, Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary; and WHEREAS, Section 18.20.200 (Implementation) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires final site plans to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing to ensure - 8 - PC2022-*** conformance with the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan prior to issuance of building permits; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified petition for a final site plan (Development Permit No. 2021-00131) to construct a for-sale single- family attached development with 73-residential dwelling units at Lot 5, Tract No. 17703, located approximately 380 feet south of the intersection of East Katella Avenue and South Metro Drive in Development Area F of the Lennar A-Town development in the Platinum Triangle in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, in connection with the final site plan, and environmental checklist review was prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 Addendum No. 4 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. The analysis in the environmental checklist review did not identify any changes in circumstances involving the final site plan; therefore, the final site plan would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on human beings would occur because of the final site plan, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. FSEIR No. 339, and Addenda, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321 for the Existing Entitlements collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures relating to the Existing Entitlements and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on July 6 , 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the proposed final site plan and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, this Planning Commission finds and determines the following: 1. That Addendum No. 4 together with the CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the final site plan; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in this resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the final site plan and, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 321, should be approved and adopted; and - 9 - PC2022-*** 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the final site plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does find and determine that the request for a final site plan for the Proposed Project should be approved for the following reasons: 1. Subject to compliance with the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, the final site plan, including its design and layout, complies with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone and is consistent with the zoning and development standards of said Zone, as described in Chapter 18.20 of the Code. 2. The design and layout of the final site plan will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the final site plan is compatible with the character of the surrounding residential and industrial development located within the land area of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. 4. The design of the final site plan will provide a desirable environment for its residents, the visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained. 5. The final site plan will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the proposed final site plan, Addendum No. 4, the CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, the Planning Commission does hereby approve the final site plan, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, contingent upon and subject to the approval of the associated (1) conditional use permit, now pending, (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321; and (3) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. - 10 - PC2022-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth relating to the propose Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-00008C. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6 , 2022. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -12- PC2022-*** -13- PC2022-*** EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FINAL SITE PLAN (DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 1 The property owner/developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 2 The property owner/developer shall prepare and submit an import/export plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall include, but not limited to, total haul quantity, number of estimated truck trips, estimated truck trips per day, duration of hauling activities, haul hours, haul route with detail on how trucks will enter and exit the site, and haul site(s). As part of the hauling operations: • A stop sign conforming to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual of Traffic Control Devices shall be posted at the entrance of the access road. • An advance warning sign must be posted a minimum of 400 feet, or as required per WATCH, on both sides of the access intersection, carrying the words “Truck Crossing”. The advance warning sign shall be covered or removed when the access intersection is not in use. • Traffic control devices and/or flagmen may be required by the City of Anaheim Public Works, Traffic Engineering 3 The property owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control, slope easements, and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services Division 4 The property owner/developer shall prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services Division -14- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 5 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer. Public Works, Development Services Division 6 The property owner/developer shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services Division 7 The property owner/developer shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Development Services Division review upon request. Public Works, Development Services Division 8 The property owner/developer shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. Public Works, Development Services Division 9 The property owner/developer shall submit a Preliminary Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services Division 10 Condition Numbers 37 through 40 of PC2015-069 for the original approval of the A-Town Master Site Plan shall apply to this permit. Public Works, Development Services Division 11 The property owner/developer shall process and record a private access easement for the proposed reciprocal access between Development Area F and Development Area E, as shown on the Final Site Plans. The property owner/developer shall provide conforming copy of the recorded easement document to the Public Works Development Services. Public Works, Development Services Division 12 The property owner/developer shall process and record a private utility easement for the proposed shared utilities between Development Area F and Development Area E, as shown on the Final Site Plans. Public Works, Development Services Division -15- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 13 The property owner/developer shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) document. The document shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with conforming deed, in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Submit recorded copies to Public works Development Services. Public Works, Development Services Division 14 The property owner/developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on the property prior to the issuance of any permits. Public Works, Development Services Division 15 At the time of grading plan submittal, a Fire Master Plan (fire access plan) shall be submitted to the Anaheim Fire Prevention Department for review. Fire & Rescue Community Risk Reduction Division PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 16 Condition Numbers 42 through 64 and 66 through 86 of PC2015-069 for the original approval of the A-Town Master Site Plan shall apply to this permit. Various City Departments 17 All buildings equipped with openings, as required by the Fire and Building Code shall be provided with an approved direct access route from the fire access road to accommodate fire department operations. The access route shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in width and be designed to accommodate a twenty-one (21) foot fire department ladder. A clear area of at least eight (8) feet in width shall be maintained free of permanent obstructions below all required rescue windows to allow for fire department ladder placement. This will be covered in the Fire Master Plan. Fire & Rescue Community Risk Reduction Division 18 If there are private fire hydrants serving this site, the property owner/developer shall provide CC&R’s submitted to the Anaheim Fire Prevention Department for review and approval covering the private fire hydrants. Fire & Rescue Community Risk Reduction Division 19 All CBC and CFC requirements shall be followed for permit issuance. Any fire permits, which includes fire sprinklers, fire alarm, etc., shall be submitted directly to the Anaheim Fire Prevention Department. Fire & Rescue Community Risk Reduction Division 20 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 21 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection, domestic water, and irrigation shall be provided and shown on plans Public Utilities, Water Engineering -16- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. 22 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section 537-537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the property owner/developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 23 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 24 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 25 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 26 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad and (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement, and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the Public Utilities, Water Engineering -17- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project. 27 The property owner/developer shall submit a water system master plan, including a hydraulic distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval. The master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed on-site water system to meet the project’s water demands and fire protection requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 28 The property owner/developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off- site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 29 Water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 30 The property owner/developer shall provide individual water service and/or fire line connections for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 31 The property owner/developer shall contact Water Engineering for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape construction plans. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 32 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall shall submit draft Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by the City Engineer, Planning and Building Director, and City Attorney, which will generally provide for the following: a. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles. b. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by the Association or City of Anaheim staff. c. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer, Public Works, Traffic Engineering -18- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Planning and Building Director or designee, and shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid. d. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan, and internal parking. 33 The property owner/developer shall provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services Division 34 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the public Easement (PUE) along the following streets: Union Street, Park Street, and Metro Drive. Public Works, Development Services Division 35 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works, Development Services Division 36 The property owner/developer shall submit an interim soils report indicating pad compaction and site stability prepared by the project's Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The pad compaction report needs to include a site plan showing the compaction testing locations. Public Works, Development Services Division 37 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim, public easement for emergency services and solid waste/trash collection access, along the interior private drive aisles and alley ways, as shown on the Final Site Plan. Public Works, Development Services Division 38 The property owner/developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to the following: private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Exhibit sheets shall be submitted with maintenance covenant to illustrate the above mentioned items. Public Works, Development Services Division -19- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 39 No decorative pavement will be permitted within the public utility easements (PUEs) limits. Public Works, Development Services Division PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION 40 Condition Numbers 87 through 99 of PC2015-069 for the original approval of the A-Town Master Site Plan shall apply to this permit. Various City Departments 41 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 42 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 43 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setbacks, except as permitted through approval of a conditional use permit, in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 44 Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive aisles. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Traffic Engineering 45 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Traffic Engineering 46 All public improvements shall be completed by the property owner/developer, inspected, and accepted by Construction Services prior to final building and zoning inspection. Damages to existing public improvements due to utility installation shall be removed and reconstructed in accordance with City standards and specifications. Public Works, Development Services Division 47 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services Division 48 The property owner/developer shall set all monuments in accordance with the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services Division -20- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 49 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department of Public Works, Development Services Division. Public Works, Development Services Division 50 The property owner/developer shall provide rooftop address/unit numbers for the police helicopter at a minimum size of 4 feet in height and 2 feet in width. The lines of the numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches thick. Numbers shall be spaced 12 inches to 18 inches apart. Numbers shall be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers shall face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers shall not be visible from ground level. Police Department, Planning & Research Unit 51 The property owner/developer shall provide individual building addressing positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular and pedestrian pathways throughout the complex. Main building numbers shall be a minimum height of 12” and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Police Department, Planning & Research Unit 52 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the owner/developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an amendment to the CC&R’s approved by the City Engineer, Planning Director and the City Attorney's office shall be recorded. Gates, if any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Public Works Traffic Engineering ONGOING DURING PROJECT OPERATION 53 The property owner/developer shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities, Water Engineering GENERAL -21- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 54 Condition Numbers 111 through 128 of PC2015-069 for the original approval of the A-Town Master Site Plan shall apply to this permit. Various City Departments 55 All conditions of approval and mitigations measures approved in conjunction with the Development Agreements for the Master Site Plan for the A-Town Development shall apply to this final site plan approval. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services 56 The following minimum horizontal clearances shall be maintained between proposed water main and other facilities: • 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals • 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities, including storm drains, gas, and electric • 6-feet minimum separation from curb face • 10-feet minimum separation from structures, footings, and trees. The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 57 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 58 No public water mains or laterals shall be installed under parking stalls, parking lots, or driveways. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 59 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 60 The property owner/developer shall provide a minimum of two connections to the public water mains and water looping inside the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 61 The property owner/developer shall be responsible for compliance with and any direct costs associated with the monitoring and reporting of all mitigation measures set forth in the attached Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) No. 321, established by the City of Anaheim as required by Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code to ensure implementation of those identified mitigation measures within the timeframes identified in the measure. MMP No. 321 is made a part of these conditions of approval by reference. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division -22- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 62 Vehicle gates shall not be installed across the project driveways or access roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, gates shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 63 The property owner/developer shall shall pay all applicable fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services Division 64 All proposed onsite sewer and storm drain system shall be private and privately maintained. Public Works, Development Services Division 65 The property owner/developer shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services Division 66 The project is expressly conditioned upon the applicants' indemnifying and holding harmless the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their members and the City Council from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of the foregoing individuals or entities, the purpose of such litigation being to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the application or related decision, or the adoption of any environmental documents which relates to the approval of the Proposed Actions. This indemnification shall include, but is not limited to, all reasonable damages, costs, expenses, attorney fees or expert witness fees that may be awarded to the prevailing party, and costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses arising out of or in connection with the approval of the application or related decision, whether or not there is concurrent, or passive negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their members and the City Council. The property owner/developer shall have the right to select legal counsel. The City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and the applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the City in the course of the defense. No later than 30 (thirty) days following the City Council's adoption of the Ordinance adopting Development Agreement No. 2005- 00008, the legal property owner shall provide a letter to the City satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office memorializing the foregoing. Planning and Building Department / City Attorney’s Office [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DEVELOPMENT AREA 'F' OF THE MASTER SITE PLAN APPROVED IN CONNECTION WITH THAT CERTAIN AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2005-00008C, AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131) (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under - 2 - PC2022-*** the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, also on October 25, 2005 and in response to the application of Lennar Platinum Triangle, LLC (“Original Developer”), Don H. Watson, Trustee of the Don H. Watson Family Trust, Julius Realty Corporation, Traffic Control Services, Inc., Joselito D. Ong and Renee Dee Ong, Roger C. Treichler and Vicki Treichler, as Co-Trustees of the Treichler Family Trust, the Robert Stovall Family Partnership, L.P. and Jennifer Leonard and Linda Gaffney, as tenants in common (collectively referred to herein, along with the Original Developer, as the "Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of up to 2,681 residences with a mix of housing types, including high rise residential towers, street townhomes, podium townhomes and lofts, with 150,000 square feet of street-related retail commercial development, public park space and associated infrastructure to be developed in four phases (the "Original Project") on certain real - 3 - PC2022-*** property consisting of approximately 43 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the south, and Katella Avenue on the north (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 332, a revision to the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to add new mitigation measure MM 5.10-7 thereto, and an Addendum to FSEIR No. 332, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 138, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project. The Property is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00434, to amend Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to re-designate an approximately 10.4-acre site from the "Office-High" land use designation to the "Mixed-Use" land use designation; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00111 to amend the PTMLUP to incorporate an approximately 10.4-acre site into the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone; (3) Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00116 to rescind, in part, City Council Resolution No. 2004-00008 pertaining to Reclassification No. 2004-00127; (4) Reclassification No. 2005- 00164, to reclassify an approximately 10.4-acre site from the "I" Industrial Zone to the PTMU Overlay Zone, meaning that the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone shall apply to the Property in addition to and, where inconsistent therewith, shall supersede any regulations of the "I" Industrial Zone; (5) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2005-00042, to incorporate an approximately 10.4-acre site into the Platinum Triangle; (5) Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-04999, permitting residential tower structures up to 400 feet in height on a portion of the Property; (6) Development Agreement No. 2005-0008; and (7) Tentative Tract Map No. 16859 for condominium purposes (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about November 8, 2005, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on December 13, 2005 as Instrument No. 2005000992876 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, in reliance on the Original Development Approvals, the Original Developer constructed certain improvements on and about the Property in accordance with the design of Tract Map No. 16859; and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial - 4 - PC2022-*** uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years and for revisions to the "Term Extension Milestones" was approved by the City Council on December 16, 2008. Accordingly, on or about January 21, 2009, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on February 23, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009000081175 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and - 5 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005- 11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to PT Metro, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to the Existing Entitlements for a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A- Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to Amendment No. 1 of the Original Development Agreement to correspond with the changes to the Existing Entitlements was approved by the City Council on October 20, 2015. Accordingly, on or about October 27, 2015, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-00008, which was recorded in the Official Records on November 13, 2015 as Instrument No. 2015000586936 (“Amended and Restated Development Agreement”); and - 6 - PC2022-*** WHEREAS, the Developer's request for an amendment to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement to amend the Exhibit “G” Term Extension Milestones relative to the timing and completion of residential units within the 5-year and 7.5-year anniversary periods was approved by the City Council on June 12, 2018. Accordingly, on or about June 21, 2018, the City and Developer entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on May 3, 2019 as Instrument No. 2019000148064(“Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement, Amendment No. 1, Amended and Restated Development Agreement, and Amendment No.1 to the Amended and Restated Development Agreement shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement, the Original Development Approvals, General Plan Amendment No. 2013-00490, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00598, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2013-00112, Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005- 00008C, the Master Site Plan, and Tentative Tract Map No. 17703, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated June 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 17.5-acre (approximate) property located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way to permit 1,079 residential units, including 12 live/work units; 14,600 square feet of commercial space; a 1.1-acre public park; and, local streets (the "Jefferson Stadium Park Project"). On June 21, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6373 to approve a Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. to develop the Jefferson Stadium Park Project with a (1) General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use, Green and Circulation Elements of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the proposed public park and proposed street alignment, (2) amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to reconfigure internal streets, reflect the relocation of a proposed park, and designate areas currently assigned for park use for mixed-use development, and (3) a tentative parcel map to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and a public park to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2016 ("Addendum No. 6"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with a proposed master planned mixed-use project on a 14.8-acre (approximate) property located at the northeast corner of State College Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue to permit 405 residential units; 77,000 square feet of office; and 583,000 square feet of commercial uses including a 200-room hotel (the "LT Platinum Center Project"). On October 25, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6387 to approve a Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and LTG Platinum LLC, to develop the LT Platinum Center Project with a (1) General Plan Amendment to revise Table LU- 4, General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City, to modify the density provisions for properties within the Platinum Triangle area that are designated for mixed-use land use, to reduce the maximum number of dwelling units from 19,027 to 17,348 units; to increase the maximum square feet of commercial space from 4,735,111 to 4,782,243; and, to reduce the maximum of amount of office space from 9,652,747 to 9,180,747 square feet. In addition, - 7 - PC2022-*** modifications to the Land Use Plan (Figure LU-4), Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities (Figure C-5) and Green Plan (Figure G‐5) of the Anaheim General Plan are required in order to remove the designation of a public park on the project site, (2) amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to revise the district boundaries for the Stadium and Gateway Districts; allow a reduction, conversion and transfer of unused development intensity from the Gateway, Gene Autry, Katella, and Orangewood Districts to the Stadium District; revise development intensities consistent with the transfers and reductions described above, and modify the park and street locations consistent with the proposed project, (3) a conditional use permit to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages at various venues within the LT Platinum project; (4) a tentative tract map to subdivide the project site into two parcels that correspond to the two Development Areas shown on the proposed Master Site Plan for the project; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 to FSEIR No. 339, dated March 2017 (“Addendum No. 7”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard Improvement Projects to widen Gene Autry Way from four lanes to six lanes with medians and storm drain and stormwater improvements; widen the west side of State College Boulevard between Gateway Office and Artisan Court to accommodate a southbound right‐turn lane and a third through‐ lane; make improvements to the east side of the intersection of State College Boulevard at Gene Autry Way, which is the west entrance to Angel Stadium of Anaheim; and construct a new intersection on Gene Autry Way at Union Street to provide access to planned development areas; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 8 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 10, 2018, (“Addendum No. 8”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project which included roadway improvements specified in the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP). The Approved Project included the widening of Orangewood Avenue from a four‐lane divided primary arterial to a six‐lane divided primary arterial between State College Boulevard and State Route 57 (SR‐57). It also included an extension of the Class II Bikeway on Orangewood Avenue from east of State College Boulevard to the eastern City limit (via West Dupont Drive and private properties); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 9 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 17, 2022, (“Addendum No. 9”) was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the widening of Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian access; incorporate an additional westbound through lane; and widen the existing Orangewood Avenue bridge structure over the Santa Ana River. It also included a change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, and amendments to the General Plan, Zoning Map, Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary; and WHEREAS, Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires conditional use permits to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing to make a finding of fact, by resolution, to verify compliance with Section 18.66.060 (Findings) of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified petition for a conditional use permit to allow for ground-mounted utility facilities within the interior structural setback and to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach into the required setback between buildings in Development Area F of the Lennar A-Town development in the Platinum Triangle in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as - 8 - PC2022-*** generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, in connection with the conditional use permit, and environmental checklist review was prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 Addendum No. 4 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. The analysis in the environmental checklist review did not identify any changes in circumstances involving the conditional use permit; therefore, the conditional use permit would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on human beings would occur because of the conditional use permit, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. FSEIR No. 339, and Addenda, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321 for the Existing Entitlements collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures relating to the Existing Entitlements and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2022, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, this Planning Commission finds and determines the following: 1. That Addendum No. 4 together with the CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the final site plan; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in this resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the conditional use permit and, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 321, should be approved and adopted; and 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the conditional use permit. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to permit the conditional use permit on the Property does find and determine the following facts: - 9 - PC2022-*** 1. The proposed request to permit the conditional use permit is an allowable use within the "PTMU" Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone under subsection .060 of Section 18.20.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone) of the Code, subject to the zoning and development standards of the "PTMU" Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone; and 2. The proposed request to permit the conditional use permit would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the conditional use permit will continue to further the vision of the Platinum Triangle by contributing to an overall urban design framework ensuring that the appearance and effects of buildings, improvements, and uses are harmonious with the character of the area in which they are located; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the conditional use permit in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the site will accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. Additionally, the plans indicate landscaping between the street and the ground-mounted utility facilities as required by Code; and 4. That the conditional use permit will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the request to allow for ground-mounted utility facilities within the interior structural setback will not produce any additional traffic beyond what was analyzed and approved in FSEIR No. 339 and Addenda and what was approved in the Existing Entitlements; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the conditional use permit would further the objectives of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, subject to compliance with the conditions contained herein. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the proposed conditional use permit, Addendum No. 4, the other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, does hereby approve and recommends that the Planning Commission approve the conditional use permit, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, contingent upon and subject to the approval of the associated (1) final site plan, now pending, (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321; and (3) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use - 10 - PC2022-*** of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth relating to the propose Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2005-00008C. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6 , 2022. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -11- PC2022-*** -12- PC2022-*** EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2021-00131) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL 1 The project landscape frontage along Union Street shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner, which plans are on file with the Planning Division, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department Planning Services Division 2 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 The project is expressly conditioned upon the applicants' indemnifying and holding harmless the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their members and the City Council from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of the foregoing individuals or entities, the purpose of such litigation being to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the application or related decision, or the adoption of any environmental documents which relates to the approval of the Proposed Actions. This indemnification shall include, but is not limited to, all reasonable damages, costs, expenses, attorney fees or expert witness fees that may be awarded to the prevailing party, and costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses arising out of or in connection with the approval of the application or related decision, whether or not there is concurrent, or passive negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their members and the City Council. The property owner/developer shall have the right to select legal counsel. The City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and the applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the City in the course of the defense. No later than 30 (thirty) days following the City Council's adoption of the Ordinance adopting Development Agreement No. 2005-00008, the legal property owner shall provide a letter to the City satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office memorializing the foregoing. Planning and Building Department / City Attorney’s Office 4 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division -13- PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 5 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the Applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. 5 PLEX ‘A’ | CONTEMPORARY Scheme 3 4 PLEX ‘C’ | MID CENTURY MODERN Scheme 4 4 PLEX ‘A’ | CONTEMPORARY Scheme 1 4 PLEX ‘B’ | TRANSITIONAL Scheme 2 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET | 2021068 | 07-06-22 C2 COLLABORATIVE Contact: BLAINE SHEARER 100 AVENIDA MIRAMAR SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672 949-366-6624 | BSHEARER@C2COLLABORATIVE.COM HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. Contact: TED FRATTONE 3 HUGHES IRVINE, CA 92618 949-768-2541 | TFRATTONE@HUNSAKER.COM OUR TEAM Lennar Homes Contact: Vivian Gianetti Extale 15131 Alton Parkway, Suite 365 Irvine CA 92618 949-349-8123 | www.lennar.com WHA. Architects . Planners . Designers . Contact: Mike Cantrell 680 Newport Center Dr Newport Beach CA 92660 949.250.0607 | www.WHAinc.com SHEET INDEX: A1.0 Architectural Site Plan A1.1 4 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - First Level A1.2 4 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - Second Level A1.3 4 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - Third Level A1.4 4 PLEX I ‘A’ Contemporary Exterior Elevations A1.5 4 PLEX I ‘B’ Floor Plans - First Level A1.6 4 PLEX I ‘B’ Floor Plans - Second Level A1.7 4 PLEX I ‘B’ Floor Plans - Third Level A1.8 4 PLEX I ‘B’ Transitional Exterior Elevations A1.9 4 PLEX I ‘C ’ Floor Plans - First Level A1.10 4 PLEX I ‘C ’ Floor Plans - Second Level A1.11 4 PLEX I ‘C ’ Floor Plans - Third Level A1.12 4 PLEX I ‘C ’ Mid Century Modern Exterior Elevations A2.1 5 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - First Level A2.2 5 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - Second Level A2.3 5 PLEX I ‘A’ Floor Plans - Third Level A2.4 5 PLEX I ‘A’ Contemporary Exterior Elevations A3.1 Unit Plan 1 A3.2 Unit Plan 1 | Sections A3.3 Unit Plan 2 A3.4 Unit Plan 2 | Sections A3.5 Unit Plan 3 A3.6 Unit Plan 3 | Sections A3.7 Unit Plan 4 A3.8 Unit Plan 4 | Sections CM-1 Colors and Materials CM-2 4 PLEX / 5 PLEX | Color Studies CM-3 4 PLEX / 5 PLEX | Color Studies C -1 SITE PLAN C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN C-3 PRELIMINARY WET UTILITY PL AN C-4 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN C-5 FIRE ACCES S PLAN L-1 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PLANT LIST L-2 REC CENTER ENL ARGEMENT L-3 POCKET PARK ENLARGEMENT L-4 IRRIGATION PLAN L-5 RECREATION LEISURE PLAN L-6 RESIDENTIAL ALLEY DESIGN L-7 ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES SCREENING EXHIBIT EP-10 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PL AN EP-20 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PL AN UNION STREET ATTACHMENT NO. 3 © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET | 2021068 | 07-06-22 0 7.5 15 30 A-1.0************************WH A4 FFFFHSS A3A4A3 HSS A3 HSS A3 HSS A4A4A3A3 HSS A4HSSA4HSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCA4HSSFFFFFFFFFFFFD D D D D D A3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSS1 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 1 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 2 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 3 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 4 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 5 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 9 2 10BR PLAN 1A - - UNIT 8 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 7 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 6 3 10A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 10 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 11 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 12 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 13 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 17 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 16 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 15 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 14 4 10AR 5 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 18 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 19 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 20 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 21 6 20AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 26 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 25 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 24 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 23 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 22 13 10BR PLAN 4A - - UNIT 56 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 55 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 54 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 53 12 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 48 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 49 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 50 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 51 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 52 11 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 43 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 44 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 45 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 46 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 47 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 42 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 41 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 40 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 39 10 10AR 9 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 35 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 36 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 37 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 38 8 10ARPLAN 4 - - UNIT 34 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 33 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 32 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 31 7 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 27 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 28 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 29 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 3014 10BR PLAN 4A - - UNIT 60 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 59 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 58 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 57 17 10AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 73 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 72 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 71 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 70 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 61 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 62 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 63 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 64 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 65 15 20A PLAN 3A - - UNIT 66 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 67 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 68 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 6916 10BR DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 11/09/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703CITY SUBMITTAL - 2021.11.09DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTYWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C 1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN NORTH 1 10 BUILDING NUMBER SITE LEGEND PLAN TYPE(NOTE: "M" DENOTES REVERSE OR MIRROR FLOOR PLAN) BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBER (ARE PARK STREET ADRESSES) RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER "ADDRESS" UNIT 1 1629 101 BUILDING TYPE(NOTE: "R" DENOTES BUILDING REVERSE) 1 RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER (1-115) 1" = 30'-0" ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1' = 40'-0" - 21068_A0-41 A0.41 POOL POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM M W PARK STREET UNION STREETUNION STREETPARK STREET MERIDIANSTREET (PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)*********************METRO(PRIVATE)DRIVE1 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 1 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 2 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 3 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 4 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 5 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 9 2 10BR PLAN 1A - - UNIT 8 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 7 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 6 3 10A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 10 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 11 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 12 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 13 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 17 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 16 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 15 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 14 4 10AR 5 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 18 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 19 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 20 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 21 6 20AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 26 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 25 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 24 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 23 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 22 13 10BR PLAN 4A - - UNIT 56 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 55 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 54 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 53 12 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 48 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 49 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 50 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 51 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 52 11 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 43 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 44 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 45 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 46 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 47 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 42 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 41 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 40 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 39 10 10AR 9 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 35 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 36 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 37 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 38 8 10ARPLAN 4 - - UNIT 34 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 33 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 32 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 31 7 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 27 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 28 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 29 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 3014 10CR PLAN 4B - - UNIT 60 PLAN 1B - - UNIT 59 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 58 PLAN 3B - - UNIT 57 17 10AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 73 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 72 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 71 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 70 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 61 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 62 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 63 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 64 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 65 15 20A PLAN 3A - - UNIT 66 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 67 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 68 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 6916 10BR DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: JO MC - 2021068 05/16/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 177032022.05.16_VE SET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY ATHIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C 1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN NORTH 1" = 30'-0" ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1' = 40'-0" - 21068_A0-41 A0.41 WH CONTROLLERCLEARANCE CHEMICAL POOLFILTER SANDTR-140CHEATERCR-407ASERVICECLEARANCESPA PANELCLEARANCEELECTRICALPOOL ANDA4 FFFFHSS A3 A4A3 HSS A3 HSS A3 HSS A4A4A3A3 HSS A4HSSA4HSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCA4HSSFFFFFFFFFFFFD D D D D D A3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA3HSS1 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 1 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 2 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 3 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 4 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 5 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 9 2 10BR PLAN 1A - - UNIT 8 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 7 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 6 3 10A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 10 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 11 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 12 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 13 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 17 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 16 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 15 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 14 4 10AR 5 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 18 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 19 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 20 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 21 6 20AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 26 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 25 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 24 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 23 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 22 13 10BR PLAN 4A - - UNIT 56 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 55 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 54 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 53 12 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 48 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 49 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 50 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 51 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 52 11 20A PLAN 4 - - UNIT 43 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 44 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 45 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 46 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 47 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 42 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 41 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 40 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 39 10 10AR 9 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 35 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 36 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 37 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 38 8 10ARPLAN 4 - - UNIT 34 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 33 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 32 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 31 7 10B PLAN 4A - - UNIT 27 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 28 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 29 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 3014 10BR PLAN 4A - - UNIT 60 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 59 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 58 PLAN 3A - - UNIT 57 17 10AR PLAN 4 - - UNIT 73 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 72 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 71 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 70 PLAN 4 - - UNIT 61 PLAN 1 - - UNIT 62 PLAN 2 - - UNIT 63 PLAN 2A - - UNIT 64 PLAN 3 - - UNIT 65 15 20A PLAN 3A - - UNIT 66 PLAN 2B - - UNIT 67 PLAN 1A - - UNIT 68 PLAN 4A - - UNIT 6916 10BR DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 07/20/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. #DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - PROGRESS SET 07-20-2021DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHERPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENTOF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C 1ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN NORTH 110 BUILDING NUMBERSITE LEGENDPLAN TYPE(NOTE: "M" DENOTES REVERSE OR MIRROR FLOOR PLAN)BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBER (ARE PARK STREET ADRESSES) RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER "ADDRESS" UNIT 11629 101 BUILDING TYPE(NOTE: "R" DENOTES BUILDING REVERSE) 1 RESIDENTIAL UNIT NUMBER (1-115) 1" = 30'-0" ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1' = 40'-0" - 21068_A0-41 A0.41 POOL POOL EQUIPMENT ROOM M W PARK STREET UNION STREETARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 10 C | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-1.1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 4 PLEX A | FLOOR PLANS First Level | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-1.2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 4 PLEX A | FLOOR PLANS Second Level | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-1.3 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 4 PLEX A | FLOOR PLANS Third Level Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.4 Rear3 I 2 I 1 I 4 4 I 1 I 2 I 3 3 4 Right Left Front | Scheme 1 MATERIALS: Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Fascia: 2X Wood Fascia Barge: Wood Barge Board Exterior: Stucco & Siding Window: 2” Recess Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door w/ Trim Surround Garage Door: Decorative Metal Roll-Up Garage Door 4 PLEX | ‘A’ CONTEMPORARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS+ 38’-0” 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.5 4 PLEX B | FLOOR PLANS First Level 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.6 4 PLEX B | FLOOR PLANS Second Level 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.7 4 PLEX B | FLOOR PLANS Third Level Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.8 Rear3 I 2 I 1 I 4 4 I 1 I 2 I 3 3 4 Right Left Front MATERIALS: Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Fascia: 2X Wood Fascia Barge: Wood Barge Board Exterior: Stucco & Siding Window: 2” Recess Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door w/ Trim Surround Garage Door: Decorative Metal Roll-Up Garage Door 4 PLEX | ‘B’ TRANSITIONAL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS | Scheme 2+ 38’-0” 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.9 4 PLEX C | FLOOR PLANS First Level PLAN 4 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.10 4 PLEX C | FLOOR PLANS Second Level PLAN 4 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.11 4 PLEX C | FLOOR PLANS Third Level PLAN 4 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 3 Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-1.12 Rear3 4 Right Left Front MATERIALS: Exterior: Stucco & Siding Window: 2” Recess Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door w/ Trim Surround Garage Door: Decorative Metal Roll-Up Garage Door 4 PLEX | ‘C’ MID CENTURY MODERN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS | Scheme 4 3 I 2 I 1 I 4 4 I 1 I 2 I 3+ 38’-0” | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-2.1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 5 PLEX | FLOOR PLANS First Level | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-2.2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 5 PLEX | FLOOR PLANS Second Level | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-2.3 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 5 PLEX | FLOOR PLANS Third Level Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. 0 4 8 16 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA PLANNING COMMISSION SET A-2.4 Rear3 I 2 I 2 I 1 I 43 4 I 1 I 2 I 2 I 34 Right Left Front MATERIALS: Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Fascia: 2X Wood Fascia Barge: Wood Barge Board Exterior: Stucco & Siding Window: 2” Recess Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door w/ Trim Surround Garage Door: Decorative Metal Roll-Up Garage Door 5 PLEX | ‘A’ CONTEMPORARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS | Scheme 3+ 38’-0” NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 1 FIRST LEVEL 244 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 699 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 732 SQ. FT. TOTAL 1675 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 486 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 70 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 1 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)3 BATH(S)2.5 21'-0"39'-0"21'-0"39'-0"17'-0"4'-0"10'-10"15'-6"1'-9"16'-0"2'-6" 6'-2"2'-6"16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP 16R 24 68 2'-4"3'-6"5'-0" 4046 SL 30SC80MT 28SC80MT2'-8"12'-10"2'-8"12'-8"23'-8"5"5"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE FAMILY RM 9'-0" CLG.H.S. ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG.4'-0"9" 2'-2"4'-10"4'-0"3'-1112"8'-812"3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.4'-0"15'-8"8'-0"3'-6"11"11"T R C 35 gal95 gal95 gal 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 325 305305 308308 410 005005 309309 114 002002 007007422 444 TYP. ABV. 8'-6" 410 251 252 CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. COMPOSTCONTAINER DECK VENTILATION (PLAN 1) PER C.B.C. 1203.12.2.6, THE NET VENTILATING AREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/150 OF THE AREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED. DECK AREA: 21 S.F. (3,024 SQ. IN.) MIN. REQUIRED VENTILATION: 20 SQ. IN. NET FREE AREA (1) 2"X96" GAF "LSV8" SOFFIT VENTILATION VENTS OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDED: AT 68 SQ. IN. EA. =68 SQ. IN. > 20 SQ. IN. * SEE DECK VENTILATION 61 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 70 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.5' W x 3.5' L x 7' H 61 CUBIC FEET 21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"4'-0"18'-0"17'-0" 3'-11"10'-2"7'-10"UP16R DN16R 24685'-6"14'-9"3'-10"7'-2"5'-6"4'-6"24682040 SH 2'-2"1'-9" 4'-1"3080FR. DOORT.G.24685046 SL 9" 5'-6"9'-3"26'-2"1'-3"9'-3"2'-4"3050 SH 3050 SH 3'-01 2"3'-6"2'-11" 9'-0" DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG. H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG.PLI-DEK TECH. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CL. 8'-4" CLG.3'-4"4'-6"1'-6"1'-6"10'-6"11'-412"4'-312"8'-0"4'-1"10'-1"1'-6"3'-0"6'-0"5'-6"6'-2"6"6"3'-10"3'-0"3'-41 2"5'-0"3'-8" 4'-1"10'-111 2"1'-111 2"4'-0"444 TYP.325 TYP. ABV. 329 TYP. ABV. 351 467 442 2x6 451451451 359 355 360 453 471 401 8'-0"454 460 457 401 8'-0" 422 8'-6" 329 329 464 442 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"40'-6"22'-6"4'-0"18'-0"17'-0" DN16R 10'-4"10'-8"10'-6"2668266810'-6"2'-4"2'-4"BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068 5'-2"5'-2" 3050 SH 5'-2"5'-6" 2468 4'-3"5'-5"28682468 28683'-6"16'-8"7'-6"5'-1"12'-11"5'-2"11'-10" 3050 SH 3050 SH 3'-6"5'-5"2'-11" 2040 SH 2'-0"3'-2" 2468 BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG.CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPETCHSCHS BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 24683'-8" 6'-10" 3'-2" 3'-10"3'-6"6'-10" 3'-8"3'-2"4'-5"12'-3"7'-6"1'-9"7'-3"3'-7"3'-4"4'-3"3'-4"7"3'-0"2'-6" 11"2'-5"6'-1" 2'-5"1'-1"4'-1" 4'-1"3'-6" 3050 SH 401 8'-0" 462 390 48"x50" 387 416 322322 374 335335 341341 380 32"x60" 441 462462 329 44" 382 461 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTYWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 1 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.10 1PLAN 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 1 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 1 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SHTEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 ANDVENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKING MECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUPR-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICALDRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 14" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHESMINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVELFLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THE DOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1.C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES.D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DONOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 1 NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 1 FIRST LEVEL 244 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 699 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 732 SQ. FT. TOTAL 1675 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 486 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 70 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 1 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)3 BATH(S)2.5 21'-0"39'-0"21'-0"39'-0"17'-0"4'-0"10'-10"15'-6"1'-9"16'-0"2'-6" 6'-2"2'-6"16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP 16R 24 68 2'-4"3'-6"5'-0" 4046 SL 30SC80MT 28SC80MT2'-8"12'-10"2'-8"12'-8"23'-8"5"5"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE FAMILY RM 9'-0" CLG.H.S. ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG.4'-0"9" 2'-2"4'-10"4'-0"3'-1112"8'-812"3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.4'-0"15'-8"8'-0"3'-6"11"11"T R C 35 gal95 gal95 gal 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 325 305305 308308 410 005005 309309 114 002002 007007422 444 TYP. ABV. 8'-6" 410 251 252 CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. COMPOSTCONTAINER DECK VENTILATION (PLAN 1)PER C.B.C. 1203.12.2.6, THE NET VENTILATINGAREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/150 OF THEAREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED.DECK AREA: 21 S.F. (3,024 SQ. IN.) MIN. REQUIRED VENTILATION: 20 SQ. IN. NET FREE AREA (1) 2"X96" GAF "LSV8" SOFFIT VENTILATION VENTS OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDED: AT 68 SQ. IN. EA. =68 SQ. IN. > 20 SQ. IN. * SEE DECK VENTILATION 61 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 70 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.5' W x 3.5' L x 7' H 61 CUBIC FEET 21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"4'-0"18'-0"17'-0" 3'-11"10'-2"7'-10"UP16R DN16R 24685'-6"14'-9"3'-10"7'-2"5'-6"4'-6"24682040 SH 2'-2"1'-9" 4'-1"3080FR. DOORT.G.24685046 SL 9" 5'-6"9'-3"26'-2"1'-3"9'-3"2'-4"3050 SH 30 50 SH 3'-01 2"3'-6"2'-11" 9'-0" DINING 9'-0" CLG. H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG. PLI-DEK TECH. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CL. 8'-4" CLG.3'-4"4'-6"1'-6"1'-6"10'-6"11'-412"4'-312"8'-0"4'-1"10'-1"1'-6"3'-0"6'-0"5'-6"6'-2"6"6"3'-10"3'-0"3'-41 2"5'-0"3'-8" 4'-1"10'-111 2"1'-111 2"4'-0"444 TYP.325 TYP. ABV. 329 TYP. ABV. 351 467 442 2x6 451451451 359 355 360 453 471 401 8'-0"454 460 457 401 8'-0" 422 8'-6" 329 329 464 442 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 21'-0"40'-6"21'-0"40'-6"22'-6"4'-0"18'-0"17'-0" DN16R 10'-4"10'-8"10'-6"2668266810'-6"2'-4"2'-4"BI-PASS5068 BI-PASS5068 5'-2"5'-2" 3050 SH 5'-2"5'-6" 2468 4'-3"5'-5"28682468 28683'-6"16'-8"7'-6"5'-1"12'-11"5'-2"11'-10" 3050 SH 30 50 SH 3'-6"5'-5"2'-11" 2040 SH 2'-0"3'-2" 2468 BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG.CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPETCHSCHS BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 24683'-8" 6'-10" 3'-2" 3'-10"3'-6"6'-10" 3'-8"3'-2"4'-5"12'-3"7'-6"1'-9"7'-3"3'-7"3'-4"4'-3"3'-4"7"3'-0"2'-6" 11"2'-5"6'-1" 2'-5"1'-1"4'-1" 4'-1"3'-6" 3050 SH 401 8'-0" 462 390 48"x50" 387 416 322322 374 335335 341341 380 32"x60" 441 462462 329 44" 382 461 1 A-3.2 1 A-3.2 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHERPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENTOF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 1 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.10 1PLAN 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 1 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 1 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SH TEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 AND VENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKINGMECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERSYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATEDGALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 1 4" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHES MINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THEDOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1. C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES. D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOTSWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DO NOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"W.I.C. COATS CLOSET 2-BAY GARAGE DINING KITCHEN BEDROOM 3HALL 8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT FIN. FLOOR7'-9"7'-1"2'-10"3'-6" MIN.2'-10"T.O.HANDRAIL T.O.HANDRAILOPEN TO ENTRY T.O. GUARD 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD 2'-10"2'-10"3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD T.O.HANDRAIL 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"W.I.C. COATS CLOSET 2-BAY GARAGE DINING KITCHEN BEDROOM 3HALL 8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT FIN. FLOOR7'-1"2'-10"3'-6" MIN.T.O.HANDRAILOPEN TO ENTRY T.O. GUARD 7'-9"2'-10"T.O.HANDRAIL 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD 2'-10"2'-10"T.O.HANDRAIL DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 11/09/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703CITY SUBMITTAL - 2021.11.09DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY ATHIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C UNIT SECTIONS PLAN 1 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.12 1PLAN 1 2PLAN 1 | 2021068 | 11-09-21© 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL A-3.2 UNIT PLAN 1 | SECTIONS GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL WINDOW JAMB INSULATION WHERE OCCURS CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT PER PLAN 4-1/2'' MIN. DBL. 2x6 SILL PLATES 2X6 FRAMING SL. SL. WINDOW HEAD NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT AND CERTIFY THAT EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WEATHER-RESISTANT PER CRC SECTION R703.1, FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING. NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/AD2.1 FOR APPLICATION RECESSED WINDOW INSTALLATION - 2X6 WALL AT STUCCO 3"=1'-0" 3C-WI-WINR2-STO1-00PER ELEV.4-1/2'' MIN.STUCCO PER PLAN 6'' MIN. GYP. BD.6" MIN. PER ELEV.VERIFY WITH STRUCT.GYP. BD. TRANSOM AT WINDOW WINDOW MULLION WINDOW FRAME BOTH SIDES 2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME WINDOW FRAME 1/4"TYP.INSULATION WHERE OCCURS HEADER PER STRUCT. GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME SLOPE FOAM TO DRAIN (WHERE OCCURS) - TYP. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS GYP. BD.2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 2x6 FRAMING (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 1/4" TYP. 1/4" TYP. STUCCO FLASHING MEMBRANE (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. STUCCO HEADER PER STRUCT. FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT14"TYP.CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT NOTE: SEE L.A.P. LIST ON SHEET D0.1 12" STRIP OF ELASTOMERIC S.A.M (1) LAYER OF W.R.B.2"MIN.W.R.B. BIBB 1/2" CANT STRIP (3) 2x4 SILL PLATES WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS 1 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 1 | SECTIONS 1x4 FOAM TRIM. 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 2 FIRST LEVEL 299 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 761 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 806 SQ. FT. TOTAL 1865 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 497 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 85 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 2 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)3 BATH(S)2.540'-0"22'-4"40'-0"1'-9"16'-0"2'-6" 5'-0"17'-4"36'-6"3'-6"21'-0" 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACEUP 16R 246830SC80MT 5'-0"12'-4" 3'-7"2'-8"2'-4"28SC80MT 12'-10"23'-8"5"5"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE FAMILY RM 9'-0" CLG.H.S. ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG.23'-8"12'-8"2'-8"9"1'-0"2'-6"2'-6" 3'-6"2'-9"2'-6"8'-812"3'-1112"3'-11"4'-11"3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.4'-0"30 50 SH 3050 SH4'-0"8'-0"3'-6"11"11"15'-8"TRC 35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.4 325 305305 308308 309309 114 002002 TYP. ABV. 410 007007 422 8'-6" 410 410 ABV.329 444 8'-0" 005005 401 8'-0" 251252 115 111 COMPOSTCONTAINER CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. DECK VENTILATION (PLAN 1)PER C.B.C. 1203.12.2.6, THE NET VENTILATINGAREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/150 OF THEAREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED.DECK AREA: 36 S.F. (5,184 SQ. IN.) MIN. REQUIRED VENTILATION: 35 SQ. IN. NET FREE AREA (1) 2"X96" GAF "LSV8" SOFFIT VENTILATION VENTS OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDED: AT 68 SQ. IN. EA. =68 SQ. IN. > 35 SQ. IN. * SEE DECK VENTILATION 101 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.75' W x 5.25' L x 7' H 101 CUBIC FEET41'-6"21'-0"41'-6"17'-2"39'-0"21'-0"7'-0"10'-0"11'-0" UP16RDN16R 246824686'-0"5'-7"19'-8"2'-8"24685'-1"4'-5"9'-4" 5046 SL 1'-4"13'-6"9"17'-0"3080FR. DOORT.G.30 50 SH 3050 SH 3'-7"3'-6"3'-11" 20 40 SH 4'-10"5'-2" 2'-8"2'-2" 101 2"9'-0"1'-11 2" DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG.PLI-DEK KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG. H.S. PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CL. 7'-8" CLG. 3'-3" 2'-6"1'-0"2'-8"1'-6"1'-6"1'-0"3'-3"3'-1112"11'-412"4'-4"4'-0"3'-9"4'-0"3'-5"2'-2"2'-1"3'-0"6'-0"3'-3"2'-9" 3'-0"3'-5"7'-4"1'-3" 4'-3"1'-9" TECH 9'-0" CLG.H.S. 6" TYP.7'-11"2'-8"422 8'-6" 471 355 359 467 401 329 360 453 351 442 329 2x6 ABV. 451451451 444 454 458 427 TYP. 442 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.441'-6"21'-0"41'-6"1'-6"39'-0"21'-0" DN16R 14'-6" 5050 SH 3050 SH 7'-3"3'-7"3'-3"3'-3"11'-2"10'-6"2'-5"2668BI-PASS5068 2668BI-PASS5068 28 683'-9"17'-4"6'-9"246824682468 9'-9"3'-4"12'-10"246828687'-21 2"13'-91 2" 30 50 SH 3050 SH 2'-0" 20 40 SH BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG. CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG. H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG.CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG. CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HSCHSCHS 1'-8"6'-6" 3'-8" 3'-6"2'-0"1'-6"1'-0"1'-0"3'-9"4'-1"2'-10"3'-3"3'-0"4'-1"3'-712"9'-0"1'-6"2'-7"3'-10"3'-612"3'-10"2'-3"11'-3"5'-7"1'-7"9'-3"3'-0"3"3"2'-71 2"4'-0"6'-101 2"3'-81 2"3'-91 2" 2'-6"1'-81 2"3'-0"4'-41 2"7'-6"1'-11"1'-4" 1'-6" 6" TYP. 1'-11" 1'-2" 427 462 462 374 341341 335335 416 444 322322 380 32"x60" 462 390 387 329 329 382 52"x54" 461 401 8'-0" TYP. 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.4 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHERPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENTOF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 2 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-20 A2.20 1PLAN 2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 2 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SH TEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 AND VENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKINGMECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERSYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATEDGALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 1 4" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHES MINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THEDOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1. C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES. D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOTSWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DO NOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 2 FIRST LEVEL 299 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 761 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 806 SQ. FT. TOTAL 1865 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 497 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 85 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 2 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)3 BATH(S)2.540'-0"22'-4"40'-0"1'-9"16'-0"2'-6" 5'-0"17'-4"36'-6"3'-6"21'-0" 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACEUP 16R 246830SC80MT 5'-0"12'-4" 3'-7"2'-8"2'-4"28SC80MT 12'-10"23'-8"5"5"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE FAMILY RM 9'-0" CLG.H.S. ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG.23'-8"12'-8"2'-8"9"1'-0"2'-6"2'-6" 3'-6"2'-9"2'-6"8'-812"3'-1112"3'-11"4'-11"3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.4'-0"30 50 SH 3050 SH4'-0"8'-0"3'-6"11"11"15'-8"TRC 35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.4 325 305305 308308 309309 114 002002 TYP. ABV. 410 007007 422 8'-6" 410 410 ABV.329 444 8'-0" 005005 401 8'-0" 251252 115 111 COMPOSTCONTAINER CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. DECK VENTILATION (PLAN 1) PER C.B.C. 1203.12.2.6, THE NET VENTILATING AREA SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/150 OF THE AREA OF THE SPACE VENTILATED. DECK AREA: 36 S.F. (5,184 SQ. IN.) MIN. REQUIRED VENTILATION: 35 SQ. IN. NET FREE AREA (1) 2"X96" GAF "LSV8" SOFFIT VENTILATION VENTS OR APPROVED EQUAL PROVIDED: AT 68 SQ. IN. EA. =68 SQ. IN. > 35 SQ. IN. * SEE DECK VENTILATION 101 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.75' W x 5.25' L x 7' H 101 CUBIC FEET41'-6"21'-0"41'-6"17'-2"39'-0"21'-0"7'-0"10'-0"11'-0" UP16RDN16R 246824686'-0"5'-7"19'-8"2'-8"24685'-1"4'-5"9'-4" 5046 SL 1'-4"13'-6"9"17'-0"3080FR. DOORT.G.30 50 SH 3050 SH 3'-7"3'-6"3'-11" 2040 SH 4'-10"5'-2" 2'-8"2'-2" 101 2"9'-0"1'-11 2" DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG.PLI-DEK KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CL. 7'-8" CLG. 3'-3" 2'-6"1'-0"2'-8"1'-6"1'-6"1'-0"3'-3"3'-1112"11'-412"4'-4"4'-0"3'-9"4'-0"3'-5"2'-2"2'-1"3'-0"6'-0"3'-3"2'-9" 3'-0"3'-5"7'-4"1'-3" 4'-3"1'-9" TECH 9'-0" CLG.H.S. 6" TYP.7'-11"2'-8"422 8'-6" 471 355 359 467 401 329 360 453 351 442 329 2x6 ABV. 451451451 444 454 458 427 TYP. 442 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.441'-6"21'-0"41'-6"1'-6"39'-0"21'-0" DN16R 14'-6" 5050 SH 3050 SH 7'-3"3'-7"3'-3"3'-3"11'-2"10'-6"2'-5"2668BI-PASS5068 2668BI-PASS5068 28 683'-9"17'-4"6'-9"246824682468 9'-9"3'-4"12'-10"246828687'-21 2"13'-91 2" 30 50 SH 3050 SH 2'-0" 20 40 SH BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG. CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG. CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG. CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HSCHSCHS 1'-8"6'-6" 3'-8" 3'-6"2'-0"1'-6"1'-0"1'-0"3'-9"4'-1"2'-10"3'-3"3'-0"4'-1"3'-712"9'-0"1'-6"2'-7"3'-10"3'-612"3'-10"2'-3"11'-3"5'-7"1'-7"9'-3"3'-0"3"3"2'-71 2"4'-0"6'-101 2"3'-81 2"3'-91 2" 2'-6"1'-81 2"3'-0"4'-41 2"7'-6"1'-11"1'-4" 1'-6" 6" TYP. 1'-11" 1'-2" 427 462 462 374 341341 335335 416 444 322322 380 32"x60" 462 390 387 329 329 382 52"x54" 461 401 8'-0" TYP. 1 A-3.4 1 A-3.4 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTYWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 2 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-20 A2.20 1PLAN 2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 2 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 2 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SHTEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 ANDVENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKING MECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUPR-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICALDRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 14" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHESMINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVELFLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THE DOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1.C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES.D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DONOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.3 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 2 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"COATS PANTRY BEDROOM 2 2-BAY GARAGE POWDER CLOSET SERV.HALL W.I.C.7'-0"CLR.7'-0"CLR.7'-0"7'-0"8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT FIN. FLOOR 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL OPEN TO ENTRY2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"COATS PANTRY BEDROOM 2 2-BAY GARAGE POWDER CLOSET SERV.HALL W.I.C.7'-0"CLR.7'-0"CLR.7'-0"7'-0"8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT FIN. FLOOR 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL OPEN TO ENTRY2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 11/09/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703CITY SUBMITTAL - 2021.11.09DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY ATHIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C UNIT SECTIONS PLAN 2 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.23 1PLAN 22 PLAN 2 | 2021068 | 11-09-21© 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL A-3.4 UNIT PLAN 2 | SECTIONS GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL WINDOW JAMB INSULATION WHERE OCCURS CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT PER PLAN 4-1/2'' MIN. DBL. 2x6 SILL PLATES 2X6 FRAMING SL. SL. WINDOW HEAD NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT AND CERTIFY THAT EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WEATHER-RESISTANT PER CRC SECTION R703.1, FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING. NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/AD2.1 FOR APPLICATION RECESSED WINDOW INSTALLATION - 2X6 WALL AT STUCCO 3"=1'-0" 3C-WI-WINR2-STO1-00PER ELEV.4-1/2'' MIN.STUCCO PER PLAN 6'' MIN. GYP. BD.6" MIN. PER ELEV.VERIFY WITH STRUCT.GYP. BD. TRANSOM AT WINDOW WINDOW MULLION WINDOW FRAME BOTH SIDES 2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME WINDOW FRAME 1/4"TYP.INSULATION WHERE OCCURS HEADER PER STRUCT. GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME SLOPE FOAM TO DRAIN (WHERE OCCURS) - TYP. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS GYP. BD.2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 2x6 FRAMING (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 1/4" TYP. 1/4" TYP. STUCCO FLASHING MEMBRANE (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. STUCCO HEADER PER STRUCT. FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT14"TYP.CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT NOTE: SEE L.A.P. LIST ON SHEET D0.1 12" STRIP OF ELASTOMERIC S.A.M (1) LAYER OF W.R.B.2"MIN.W.R.B. BIBB 1/2" CANT STRIP (3) 2x4 SILL PLATES WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS 1 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.4 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 2 | SECTIONS 1x4 FOAM TRIM. 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 3 FIRST LEVEL 399 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 833 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 879 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2110 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 512 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 91 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 3 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)4 BATH(S)3.5 24'-0"40'-0"24'-0"39'-0"22'-0"11'-8"18'-6"2'-0" 2'-3"16'-0"3'-0" 5'-0"5'-6"13'-6" 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP16R 24683'-6"2'-0"30SC80MT 2'-6"4'-9" 2'-9"10'-9"12'-8"19'-8"2'-8"5'-0"3080 11'-6"BI-PASS406830SC80MT 2'-0"FLUSHFLUSH9'-3"2'-3"30682-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE BDRM. 4 9'-0" CLG.CARPET ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CHS CHSBA. 3 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG. 9"4'-0"8'-10"3'-6" 3'-10"1'-2"1'-0"7'-7"4'-51 2"4'-3"4'-3"8'-812"3'-1112"8'-11"3'-11"3'-1"3'-1"5'-4"2'-7"10'-9" 3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.2040SH3050 SH 3050 SH 3'-51 2" 3'-6"11"11"8'-0"3'-8"TRC35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 325 305305 308308 005005 309309 114 002002 TYP. ABV. 410 444 410 007007 422 8'-6" 020020 321321321 TYP. 401 8'-0" 251 252 111 CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. COMPOSTCONTAINER 111 105 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.5' W x 6' L x 7' H 105 CUBIC FEET 24'-0"41'-6"24'-0"40'-6"11'-8"20'-4"2'-0" 10'-6"13'-6"20'-4"UP16R DN16R 24682'-2"24685'-6"3'-2"6'-0"5'-4"5'-8"19'-10"5'-2"2'-2"5'-4"10'-0"1'-4"7'-0"5'-6"1'-6"20 40 SH 2'-9"2'-7"2'-7"2'-6"3050SH3050SH3050SH3'-6"4'-0"4'-0"3'-6"DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG. PLI-DEK PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CL. 7'-8" CLG.3080FR. DOORT.G.3050 SH 3050 SH 6'-6"3'-6"3'-6"24682650SH5'-4"6'-0" 5'-0"3'-0"2046 SH 2650SH20 46 SH 5'-0"6'-0" 22'-0" 20 46 SH 2'-6" 16'-0" 3'-6" 4'-0"1'-2"1'-0"1'-6"1'-6"3'-6"6'-0"7'-6"5'-8"5'-4"3'-8"12'-4"3'-10"2'-2"4'-0"11'-1012"3'-1112"4'-6"7'-0"4'-0"2'-4"4'-2"5"ABV.329 TYP. 360 467 401 355359 451451451 442 2X6 351 329 444 422 8'-6" 471 427 TYP. 442 1 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 6'-0"41'-6"24'-0"40'-6"24'-0"13'-2"27'-4"2'-0"16'-0"1'-6"39'-0"DN16R 16'-0" 2468 4'-1"6'-6"13'-5"10'-11"2'-0"5'-7"14'-3"6'-3"9'-4"BI-PASS5068 2668 10'-10"2'-4"BI-PASS506826688'-0"5'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-4"4'-0"BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 14'-10"28 68 SPA 9'-0" CLG.H.S.286824681'-6"2'-2"2'-2"1'-4"10'-6"3'-8" BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S.SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG. CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG. CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET CHS C HS CHS 2'-10"1'-0"2'-11"1'-2"2'-6"7'-5"3'-6"2'-1"2'-3"2'-10" 4'-4" 7'-6" 3'-2" 3'-6"3'-9" 3'-0" 7'-3" 3'-2"4'-1" 4'-10" 9'-6" 4'-8" 3'-11"6'-6" 2'-0"4'-6" 4'-1"2'-2"1'-10"1'-4"7'-2"2'-4"10'-10"11'-1"3'-0"9"2'-4"3'-612"4'-7"6'-5"3'-1012"10'-412"24682468 5050 SH 3050 SH 2040SH2050SH2650SH3050 SH 3050 SH 2650SH20 40 SH 462 462 416 380 32"x60" 329 TYP. 52"x54" 387 401 8'-0" 441 44" 322322 390 372 373 341341 335335 462 457 382 4614611 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHERPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENTOF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-30 A2.30 1PLAN 3 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 3 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 3 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SH TEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 AND VENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKINGMECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERSYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATEDGALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 1 4" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHES MINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THEDOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1. C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES. D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOTSWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DO NOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 3 FIRST LEVEL 399 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 833 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 879 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2110 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 512 SQ. FT. COVERED DECK 91 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 3 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)4 BATH(S)3.5 24'-0"40'-0"24'-0"39'-0"22'-0"11'-8"18'-6"2'-0" 2'-3"16'-0"3'-0" 5'-0"5'-6"13'-6" 16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP16R 24683'-6"2'-0"30SC80MT 2'-6"4'-9" 2'-9"10'-9"12'-8"19'-8"2'-8"5'-0"3080 11'-6"BI-PASS406830SC80MT 2'-0"FLUSHFLUSH9'-3"2'-3"30682-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE BDRM. 4 9'-0" CLG.CARPET ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. CHS CHSBA. 3 9'-0" CLG.H.S. COATS 7'-8" CLG. 9"4'-0"8'-10"3'-6" 3'-10"1'-2"1'-0"7'-7"4'-51 2"4'-3"4'-3"8'-812"3'-1112"8'-11"3'-11"3'-1"3'-1"5'-4"2'-7"10'-9" 3RD FLR. 3RD FLR.2040SH3050 SH 3050 SH 3'-51 2" 3'-6"11"11"8'-0"3'-8"TRC35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 325 305305 308308 005005 309309 114 002002 TYP. ABV. 410 444 410 007007 422 8'-6" 020020 321321321 TYP. 401 8'-0" 251 252 111 CONC STEPS AND RISERS REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. COMPOSTCONTAINER 111 105 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 2.5' W x 6' L x 7' H 105 CUBIC FEET 24'-0"41'-6"24'-0"40'-6"11'-8"20'-4"2'-0" 10'-6"13'-6"20'-4"UP16R DN16R 24682'-2"24685'-6"3'-2"6'-0"5'-4"5'-8"19'-10"5'-2"2'-2"5'-4"10'-0"1'-4"7'-0"5'-6"1'-6"20 40 SH 2'-9"2'-7"2'-7"2'-6"3050SH3050SH3050SH3'-6"4'-0"4'-0"3'-6"DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DECK 9'-0" CLG. PLI-DEK PANTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. POWDER 9'-0" CLG. H.S. CL. 7'-8" CLG.3080FR. DOORT.G.3050 SH 3050 SH 6'-6"3'-6"3'-6"24682650SH5'-4"6'-0" 5'-0"3'-0"2046 SH 2650SH20 46 SH 5'-0"6'-0" 22'-0" 2046 SH 2'-6" 16'-0" 3'-6" 4'-0"1'-2"1'-0"1'-6"1'-6"3'-6"6'-0"7'-6"5'-8"5'-4"3'-8"12'-4"3'-10"2'-2"4'-0"11'-1012"3'-1112"4'-6"7'-0"4'-0"2'-4"4'-2"5"ABV.329 TYP. 360 467 401 355359 451451451 442 2X6 351 329 444 422 8'-6" 471 427 TYP. 442 1 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 6'-0"41'-6"24'-0"40'-6"24'-0"13'-2"27'-4"2'-0"16'-0"1'-6"39'-0"DN16R 16'-0" 2468 4'-1"6'-6"13'-5"10'-11"2'-0"5'-7"14'-3"6'-3"9'-4"BI-PASS5068 2668 10'-10"2'-4"BI-PASS506826688'-0"5'-0"3'-0"3'-0"4'-4"4'-0"BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 14'-10"28 68 SPA 9'-0" CLG. H.S.286824681'-6"2'-2"2'-2"1'-4"10'-6"3'-8" BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S.SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG. CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG. CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET CHS C HS CHS 2'-10"1'-0"2'-11"1'-2"2'-6"7'-5"3'-6"2'-1"2'-3"2'-10" 4'-4" 7'-6" 3'-2" 3'-6"3'-9" 3'-0" 7'-3" 3'-2"4'-1" 4'-10" 9'-6" 4'-8" 3'-11"6'-6" 2'-0"4'-6" 4'-1"2'-2"1'-10"1'-4"7'-2"2'-4"10'-10"11'-1"3'-0"9"2'-4"3'-612"4'-7"6'-5"3'-1012"10'-412"24682468 5050 SH 3050 SH 2040SH2050SH2650SH3050 SH 3050 SH 2650SH20 40 SH 462 462 416 380 32"x60" 329 TYP. 52"x54" 387 401 8'-0" 441 44" 322322 390 372 373 341341 335335 462 457 382 4614611 A-3.6 1 A-3.6 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTYWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-30 A2.30 1PLAN 3 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 3 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 3 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SHTEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 ANDVENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKING MECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUPR-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICALDRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 14" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHESMINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVELFLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THE DOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1.C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES.D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DONOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.5 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 3 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"COATS KITCHEN BEDROOM 2 2-BAY GARAGE POWDER CLOSET BA. 2 HALL PANTRY SPA 7'-0"CLR.7'-0"CLR.7'-0"7'-0"8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL 2'-10"2'-10"2'-10"OPEN TO ENTRY FIN. FLOOR9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"7'-0"CLR.7'-0"8'-4"BOT. OF SOFFIT 3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"OPEN TO ENTRY FIN. FLOOR COATS KITCHEN BEDROOM 2 2-BAY GARAGE POWDER CLOSET BA. 2 HALL PANTRY SPA 7'-0"CLR.7'-0"3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD2'-10"T.O. HANDRAIL2'-10"2'-10"951 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 11/09/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703CITY SUBMITTAL - 2021.11.09DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY ATHIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C UNIT SECTIONS PLAN 3 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.32 1PLAN 3 2PLAN 3 | 2021068 | 11-09-21© 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL A-3.6 UNIT PLAN 3 | SECTIONS GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL WINDOW JAMB INSULATION WHERE OCCURS CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT PER PLAN 4-1/2'' MIN. DBL. 2x6 SILL PLATES 2X6 FRAMING SL. SL. WINDOW HEAD NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT AND CERTIFY THAT EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WEATHER-RESISTANT PER CRC SECTION R703.1, FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING. NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/AD2.1 FOR APPLICATION RECESSED WINDOW INSTALLATION - 2X6 WALL AT STUCCO 3"=1'-0" 3C-WI-WINR2-STO1-00PER ELEV.4-1/2'' MIN.STUCCO PER PLAN 6'' MIN. GYP. BD.6" MIN. PER ELEV.VERIFY WITH STRUCT.GYP. BD. TRANSOM AT WINDOW WINDOW MULLION WINDOW FRAME BOTH SIDES 2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME WINDOW FRAME 1/4"TYP.INSULATION WHERE OCCURS HEADER PER STRUCT. GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME SLOPE FOAM TO DRAIN (WHERE OCCURS) - TYP. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS GYP. BD.2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 2x6 FRAMING (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 1/4" TYP. 1/4" TYP. STUCCO FLASHING MEMBRANE (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. STUCCO HEADER PER STRUCT. FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT14"TYP.CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT NOTE: SEE L.A.P. LIST ON SHEET D0.1 12" STRIP OF ELASTOMERIC S.A.M (1) LAYER OF W.R.B.2"MIN.W.R.B. BIBB 1/2" CANT STRIP (3) 2x4 SILL PLATES WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS 1 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.6 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 3 | SECTIONS 1x4 FOAM TRIM. 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 4 FIRST LEVEL 589 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 1109 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 700 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2399 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 457 SQ. FT. DECK 235 SQ. FT. UTILITIES CLOSET (ELECTRICAL AND FIRE)39 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 4 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)4 BATH(S)3.5 30'-0"39'-0"30'-0"39'-0"26'-0"21'-2"4'-0" 1'-0"17'-10"1'-0"19'-0"2'-0"12'-0"1'-10"16'-0"1'-9"8'-0"4'-0"2'-0"16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP16R 512"3'-8"14'-2"MT5"5"30SC802'-0"2'-0"5"13'-0"28SC68MT 2'-1"246824685'-7"PR. 36706'-0"4'-0"3'-0"29'-3"9" 4'-9" 4046 SL 7'-11"2'-10"10'-3"3'-6"9'-2"2'-10"ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. P. PWDR. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. UTIL. 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE 2 4 68COATS 9"4'-0"26703'-7" PR. 3670 FIRERISER 9'-0" CLG.2'-9"10'-3"5'-7"2'-5"5'-6"7'-6"3'-10"14'-2"9"3'-3"4'-1"13'-6" 2"13'-4" 7'-5"1'-0"3'-8"4'-6"6'-0"3'-0"6'-3" 101 2"3'-0"3"3'-51 2" 3RD FLR.3040SH3050 SH 3050 SH 20 40 SH 4'-0"12'-812"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETETRC35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 002002 410 305305 308308 309309 325 TYP. ABV. 251 252 115 444 005005 114 007007 422 8'-6" 401 8'-0" 360 355359 451451451 442 2X6 467 401 ABV.329 TYP. 453 351 321321321 201201 111 RISER REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. 401 8'-0" 43.75 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 60 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 3' W x 4' L x 5' H 60 CUBIC FEET2.5' W x 2.5' Lx 7' H43.75CUBIC FEET30'-0"40'-6"30'-0"40'-6"14'-0"21'-2"4'-0"17'-10"10'-0"1'-6"UP16R DN16R 2 4 6824683'-8"266811'-10"2'-4"3040SH8'-0"2040SH2040SH9'-0"2'-10"2'-012"3'-11"2'-012"4'-4"4'-10"13'-6"9'-9"2'-3"24 68 28683'-9"6'-4"6'-9"28685'-3"3'-6"5'-3"246826 40 SH 3'-10"6'-2"2'-0"2'-0" TECH. 9'-0" CLG. H.S. BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG. H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG.CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS CHSCHS LIN. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BI-PASS5068 24682468 2668CHS 14'-2"12'-2"6'-0"11'-10" 2'-10"3'-6"5'-10"3'-9"3'-6"4'-7" 26 6 8 26682040SH2'-0" 20 40 SH 5'-11"6'-11 2"3'-6" 1'-61 2"1'-61 2"2'-11"1'-612"5'-312"1'-7"3'-5"2'-61 2"3'-4"6'-0"3'-4"3'-9"4'-51 2"2'-4"11'-10"2'-4"2'-6"4'-2"3'-10"2'-4"812"3'-0"2'-7"3'-9"1'-6"6'-912"3'-11"14'-0" 41 2"13'-11 2"6" 8'-1" 1'-3"3'-10"1'-6" 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH3050SH FXTEMP. GL.20402'-1112"1'-1012"1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 401 8'-0" 390 387 42"X54"382 373372 335335 457 461 461 462 454 444 462 462 461 380 32"X60" 392 TYP. 341341 464 30'-0"40'-6"30'-0"39'-0"10'-0"21'-2"4'-0"17'-10"21'-0"9'-0" 14'-0" DN16R 24682'-0"2'-0" 13'-3"BI-PASS60682668 30 50 SH 3050 SH 5'-10"3'-6"3'-11"2'-10"2040SHFX204024687'-0"7'-0" 3'-3"3'-3"25'-0"11'-2"1'-4"1'-4"BDRM. 4 9'-0" CLG.CARPET DECK 9'-0" CLG.PLI-DEK BA. 3 9'-0" CLG.H.S. FAMILY ROOM 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS LIN. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 5'-5"2'-4"24689'-2"5'-0"3'-8"14'-0"SLIDING DOOR9080 TEMP GL.2040SH3'-6" 2'-0" 3'-6"3'-6"1'-6"4'-0"1'-6"1'-6"3'-9"5'-0"1'-4"1'-4"9'-8"5'-0"7'-8"1'-4"10'-3"10'-3"2'-3"5'-2"4'-0"5'-0"3'-10"3'-10"13'-2" 51 2"12'-81 2"21'-0"4:128"1'-4" 30 50 SH3050SH 3050 SH 1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 441 44" 322322 416 444 471 445 410 TYP.TYP. ROOF 380 32"X60" 462 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHERPROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENTOF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 4 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-40 A2.40 1PLAN 4 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 4 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 4 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SH TEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 AND VENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKINGMECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERSYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATEDGALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 1 4" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHES MINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THEDOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1. C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES. D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOTSWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DO NOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 4 FIRST LEVEL 589 SQ. FT. SECOND LEVEL 1109 SQ. FT. THIRD LEVEL 700 SQ. FT. TOTAL 2399 SQ. FT. 2-BAY GARAGE 457 SQ. FT. DECK 235 SQ. FT. UTILITIES CLOSET (ELECTRICAL AND FIRE)39 SQ. FT. DWELLING PLAN SUMMARY - PLAN 4 ROOM TYPE QUANTITY BEDROOM(S)4 BATH(S)3.5 30'-0"39'-0"30'-0"39'-0"26'-0"21'-2"4'-0" 1'-0"17'-10"1'-0"19'-0"2'-0"12'-0"1'-10"16'-0"1'-9"8'-0"4'-0"2'-0"16'-0" x 7'-0" SECT. GAR. DOOR 20'-0" x 20'-0" CLEAR SPACE UP16R 512"3'-8"14'-2"MT5"5"30SC802'-0"2'-0"5"13'-0"28SC68MT 2'-1"246824685'-7"PR. 36706'-0"4'-0"3'-0"29'-3"9" 4'-9" 4046 SL 7'-11"2'-10"10'-3"3'-6"9'-2"2'-10"ENTRY 9'-0" CLG.H.S. DINING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. LIVING 9'-0" CLG.H.S. KITCHEN 9'-0" CLG.H.S. P. PWDR. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. UTIL. 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETE 2 4 68COATS 9"4'-0"26703'-7" PR. 3670 FIRERISER 9'-0" CLG.2'-9"10'-3"5'-7"2'-5"5'-6"7'-6"3'-10"14'-2"9"3'-3"4'-1"13'-6" 2"13'-4" 7'-5"1'-0"3'-8"4'-6"6'-0"3'-0"6'-3" 101 2"3'-0"3"3'-51 2" 3RD FLR.3040SH3050 SH 3050 SH 20 40 SH 4'-0"12'-812"2-BAY GARAGE 9'-0" CLG.CONCRETETRC35 gal 95 gal 95 gal 1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 002002 410 305305 308308 309309 325 TYP. ABV. 251 252 115 444 005005 114 007007 422 8'-6" 401 8'-0" 360 355359 451451451 442 2X6 467 401 ABV.329 TYP. 453 351 321321321 201201 111 RISER REFER TO CIVL DWG'S. 401 8'-0" 43.75 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 60 CU. FT. STORAGE SPACE PER ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE 18.20.130.20 3' W x 4' L x 5' H 60 CUBIC FEET2.5' W x 2.5' Lx 7' H43.75CUBIC FEET30'-0"40'-6"30'-0"40'-6"14'-0"21'-2"4'-0"17'-10"10'-0"1'-6"UP16R DN16R 2 4 6824683'-8"266811'-10"2'-4"3040SH8'-0"2040SH2040SH9'-0"2'-10"2'-012"3'-11"2'-012"4'-4"4'-10"13'-6"9'-9"2'-3"2468 28683'-9"6'-4"6'-9"28685'-3"3'-6"5'-3"246826 40 SH 3'-10"6'-2"2'-0"2'-0" TECH. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. BDRM. 2 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BA. 2 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SERV. 9'-0" CLG.H.S. SPA 9'-0" CLG.H.S. OWNER'S SUITE 9'-0" CLG.CARPET W.I.C. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BDRM. 3 9'-0" CLG.CARPET HALL 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS CHSCHS LIN. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET BI-PASS5068 24682468 2668CHS 14'-2"12'-2"6'-0"11'-10" 2'-10"3'-6"5'-10"3'-9"3'-6"4'-7" 26 6 8 26682040SH2'-0" 20 40 SH 5'-11"6'-11 2"3'-6" 1'-61 2"1'-61 2"2'-11"1'-612"5'-312"1'-7"3'-5"2'-61 2"3'-4"6'-0"3'-4"3'-9"4'-51 2"2'-4"11'-10"2'-4"2'-6"4'-2"3'-10"2'-4"812"3'-0"2'-7"3'-9"1'-6"6'-912"3'-11"14'-0" 41 2"13'-11 2"6" 8'-1" 1'-3"3'-10"1'-6" 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH3050SH FXTEMP. GL.20402'-1112"1'-1012"1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 401 8'-0" 390 387 42"X54"382 373372 335335 457 461 461 462 454 444 462 462 461 380 32"X60" 392 TYP. 341341 464 30'-0"40'-6"30'-0"39'-0"10'-0"21'-2"4'-0"17'-10"21'-0"9'-0" 14'-0" DN16R 24682'-0"2'-0" 13'-3"BI-PASS60682668 30 50 SH 3050 SH 5'-10"3'-6"3'-11"2'-10"2040SHFX204024687'-0"7'-0" 3'-3"3'-3"25'-0"11'-2"1'-4"1'-4"BDRM. 4 9'-0" CLG.CARPET DECK 9'-0" CLG.PLI-DEK BA. 3 9'-0" CLG.H.S. FAMILY ROOM 9'-0" CLG.CARPET C HS LIN. 9'-0" CLG.CARPET 5'-5"2'-4"24689'-2"5'-0"3'-8"14'-0"SLIDING DOOR9080 TEMP GL.2040SH3'-6" 2'-0" 3'-6"3'-6"1'-6"4'-0"1'-6"1'-6"3'-9"5'-0"1'-4"1'-4"9'-8"5'-0"7'-8"1'-4"10'-3"10'-3"2'-3"5'-2"4'-0"5'-0"3'-10"3'-10"13'-2" 51 2"12'-81 2"21'-0"4:128"1'-4" 30 50 SH3050SH 3050 SH 1 A-3.8 1 A-3.8 441 44" 322322 416 444 471 445 410 TYP.TYP. ROOF 380 32"X60" 462 FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTES Name NOTE 002 CONCRETE DRIVE (BY OTHERS) 005 CONCRETE GARAGE SLAB - SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOT MINIMUM IN DIRECTION INDICATED 007 CONCRETE STOOP - SLIGHT 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM TO DRAIN IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF NOT LESS THEN 44"; WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 NEED NOT EXCEED 36" (U.N.O.) PER C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.6. 020 AT ADAPTABLE/ ACCESSIBLE UNITS, THRESHOLDS AT THE PRIMARY ENTRY AND REQUIRED EXIT DOORS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 1/2". THRESHOLDS AT SECONDARY EXTERIOR DOORS, INCLUDING SLIDING DOOR TRACKS, SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 3/4". THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT OF NOT MORE THAN 1/4" MAY BE VERTICAL, AND THRESHOLDS WITH A CHANGE IN HEIGHT BETWEEN 1/4" AND 3/4" SHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NO GREATER THAN 50-PERCENT PER C.B.C. 1132A.4. THE FLOOR OR LANDING AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED MANEUVERING CLEARANCE SHALL BE LEVEL AND CLEAR PER C.B.C. 1126A.3. REFER TO DWELLING UNIT ACCESSIBILITY SHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 111 THE PRIVATE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE DWELLING UNIT AND ITS ATTIC AREA BY MEANS OF GYPSUM BOARD, NOT LESS THAN 1/2" IN THICKNESS, APPLIED TO THE GARAGE SIDE PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 114 GARAGES BENEATH HABITABLE ROOMS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM ALL HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE BY NOT LESS THAN A 5/8" TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD OR EQUIVALENT AND 1/2" GYPSUM BOARD APPLIED TO STRUCTURES SUPPORTING THE SEPARATION FROM HABITABLE ROOMS ABOVE THE GARAGE PER C.B.C. SECITON 406.3.4.1. 115 DOOR OPENINGS BETWEEN A PRIVATE GARAGE AND THE DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EITHER A SOLID WOOD DOORS, OR SOLID OR HONEYCOMB CORE STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THEN 1-3/8" IN THICKNESS, OR 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED DOORS. DOORS SHALL BE SELF CLOSING AND SELF LATCHING PER C.B.C. SECTION 406.3.4.1. 201 UTILITY EQUIPMENT & SERVICE PANELS - VERIFY LOCATION 251 TRASH WASTE CONTAINER 252 RECYCLING WASTE CONTAINER 305 TANK LESS WATER HEATER - INSTALLATION PER MFR'S. INSTRUCTIONS 308 TANKLESS WATER HEATER TERMINATION CAP - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS (CO-AXIAL VENT INTAKE & EXHAUST DIRECTLY FROM OUTSIDE) 309 TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE. DISCHARGE LINE TO THE OUTSIDE PER C.P.C. SECTION 608.5. 321 AIR CONDITIONING CONDENSER LOCATION - PAD SUPPORTING COMPRESSOR/ CONDENSER SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3" ABOVE GRADE PER C.M.C. SECTION 1105.2. 322 FORCED AIR UNIT (FAU) ATTIC INSTALLATION 325 PLUMBING FIXTURE ABOVE (TYP.) SEE UPPER FLOOR PLAN 329 DUCT CHASE 335 5" DIA. G.I. DRYER VENT WITH APPROVED LINT TRAP - VENT TO OUTSIDE 341 18"X8" MAKE-UP AIR VENT ABOVE DOOR (100 SQ. IN. MIN.) 351 REFRIGERATOR SPACE WITH RECESSED COLD WATER BOX 355 SINK WITH GARBAGE DISPOSER 359 DISHWASHER 360 SLIDE-IN RANGE/OVEN AND MICRO WITH VENT/LIGHT COMBINATION (EXHAUST VENT TO OUTSIDE). PROVIDE 24" CLEAR ABOVE RANGE/OVEN TO UNDERSIDE OF MICROWAVE VENT. 372 WASHER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 373 DRYER SPACE 374 STACKED WASHER/DRYER SPACE WITH RECESSED WATER BOX AND DRAIN PAN 380 TUB/SHOWER - SIZE PER PLAN. VERIFY UNIT DIMENSIONS WITH MANUFACTURE PRIOR TO FRAMING. PROVIDE FURRING AS NECESSARY 382 TEMPERED GLASS SHOWER DOOR/ ENCLOSURE 387 SHOWER - HOT MOP - SIZE PER PLAN 390 18" HIGH SHOWER SEAT - SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM 398 14" WIDE x 20" TALL RECESSED TILE SOAP NICHE AT 48" A.F.F., HORIZ. VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD 401 INTERIOR SOFFIT(S)/ DROPPED CEILING(S): HEIGHT PER PLAN 410 LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 411 LINE OF FLOOR BELOW 416 30"x30" ATTIC ACCESS - DIMENSIONS ARE CLEAR. PER CEnC 150.0(a)1, ATTIC ACCESS DOORS SHALL HAVE PERMANENTLY ATTACHED INSULATION USING ADHESIVE OR MECHANICAL FASTENERS AND THE ATTIC ACCESS SHALL BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. SEE DETAIL 2/D5.1. 422 STUCCO SOFFIT: HEIGHT PER PLAN 427 STUCCO SOFFIT OVER WATERPROOFED STUCCO SHELF - SLOPE FRAMING FOR DRAINAGE (1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM). 441 GYP. BD. LOW WALL - WIDTH AND HEIGHT PER PLAN. HEIGHT AT 42" MIN. A.F.F. 442 GUARD METAL RAIL OVER 2X PONY WALL - RAIL AND WALL HEIGHT PER PLAN 444 +34"- +38" HANDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 5/D5.1) 445 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (SEE DETAIL 22/D4.3) 451 KITCHEN ISLAND - PROVIDE APPROVED UNDERGROUND CONDUIT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO ISLAND 453 PANTRY 454 DESK 456 LINEN (UPPER AND LOWER) 457 LINEN (LOWER ONLY) 458 LINEN (UPPER ONLY) 461 DOUBLE SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLES 44" & 88" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY 462 SHELF AND POLE - LOCATE POLE 66" A.F.F., PROVIDE 2X6 BLOCKING WITHIN STUD BAY AT EACH END & AT CENTER OF POLE FOR HARDWARE. VERIFY SHELF BRACKET LOCATIONS & PROVIDE CONCEALED 2X BLOCKING ACCORDINGLY. 464 SHELF (OR SHELVES) 467 CABINET (BASE & UPPER) 471 ELASTOMERIC WATERPROOF DECKING SYSTEM - INSTALL PER MFR. INSTRUCTIONS. SLOPE FRAMING 1/4" PER FOOT MINIMUM FOR DRAINAGE. SHEET FLOW DRAINAGE IN DIRECTION INDICATED. SEE DET. 3&5/D4.3 DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 03/07/2022A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTYWITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY A THIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C PLAN 4 FLOOR PLANS 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-40 A2.40 1PLAN 4 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN2PLAN 4 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN3PLAN 4 - THIRD FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN LEGEND ELEMENT DESCRIPTION 2x4 STUD WALL 2x6 STUD WALL LIMIT OF SOFFIT ABOVE SL HSC FLOOR MATERIAL TRANSITION D B C A INTERIOR ELEVATION KEY ROOM NAME FLOORING CLG_HT ROOM LABEL DOOR / WINDOW SIZE & TYPE PER PLAN # A2.50 (*) INDICATES WINDOW REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOW TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC 1030.2.3080 SC3050 SHTEMP. GL. SLAB/FLOOR ELEVATION CHANGE PER CIVIL/STRUCTURAL PLANSX" SLOPE TO DRAIN - 1/4" PER FOOT MAX.; CRICKET AS REQUIRED REFER TO SHEET A6.03 FOR TEMPERED GLAZING REQUIREMENTS, DOOR NOTES, WINDOW NOTES AND EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. UNIT FLOOR PLAN NOTES REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SYMBOL LEGEND ON THE COVER SHEET A0.00 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1.ATTICS: ACCESS PER CBC SECTION 1208, DRAFTSTOPS PER CBC SECTION 718.3 & 718.4 ANDVENTILATION PER CBC SECTION 1202. 2.EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS PER CBC SECTION 1030. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 3.MEANS OF EGRESS PER CBC SECTION 1010. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES /TYPES, SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 4.GLAZING PER CBC SECTION 2406. GLAZING IN DOORS, OR WITHIN 40" OF ANY LOCKING MECHANISM, SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY GLAZING. REFER TO WINDOW & DOOR NOTES ON SHEET A6.03, FOR ADDITIONAL INFO. 5.COMBUSTION AIR TO FORCED AIR UNIT PER CMC CHAPTER 7. 6.COMBUSTION AIR TO WATER HEATER PER CPC SECTION 507.0. 7.ENVIRONMENTAL AIR DUCTS PER CMC SECTION 504. 8.MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATION AND PROTECTION AGAINST DAMAGE PER CMC SECTION 305 & 308. 9.MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLIANCES PER CEnC SECTION 110.1. 10.PER ITEM 1 OF C.B.C. 1006.2.1, IN GROUP R-2 OCCUPANCIES, ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS PERMITTED WITHIN AND FROM INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITH A MAX. OCCUPANT LOAD OF 20 WHERE THE DWELLING UNIT IS EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 AND THE COMMON PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL DOES NOT EXCEED 125 FEET. PER ITEM 4 OF C.B.C. SECTION 1006.3.3, GROUPR-3 OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE PERMITTED TO HAVE ONE EXIT OR ACCESS TO A SINGLE EXIT. 11.BATHROOMS, LAUNDRY ROOMS, WATER CLOSETS COMPARTMENTS AND SIMILAR ROOMS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VENTILATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CMC. REFER TO MECHANICALDRAWINGS. 13.FASTENERS IN CONTACT WITH PRESERVATIVE-TREATED WOOD USED IN EXTERIOR APPLICATIONS OR WET/DAMP LOCATIONS, SHALL BE OF HOT-DIPPED ZINC-COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, SILICON BRONZE, OR COPPER. 14.THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE TO DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A DOOR BUZZER, BELL, CHIME OR EQUIVALENT MOUNTED A MAXIMUM OF 48 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND CONNECTED TO PERMANENT WIRING. 15.ALL WOOD DOORS SHALL BE SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH MIN. THICKNESS OF 1-3/4", OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN 9/16" THICK. 16.PROVIDE LEVEL FLOOR OR LANDING ON EACH SIDE OF ALL DOORS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRWAYS PER CBC SECTIONS 1010.1.6 & 1011.6. A.EXTERIOR LANDINGS ARE PERMITTED TO SLOPE AT 14" PER FOOT MAX.B.LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR OR STAIRWAY AND SHALL HAVE A LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 44 INCHESMINIMUM, EXCEPT IN GROUP R-3 OCCUPANCIES AND U AND WITHIN INDIVIDUAL UNITS OF GROUP R-2 IT SHALL NOT EXCEED 36 INCHES. AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS, THE LEVELFLOOR OR LANDING AT THE ENTRY DOOR SHALL EXTEND OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF THE DOOR SWING AT LEAST 48 INCHES AT A PUSH SIDE APPROACH PER CBC SECTION 1126A.3.2.1.C.DOORS OPENING ONTO A STAIRWAY LANDING SHALL NOT REDUCE THE LANDING TO LESS THAN ONE-HALF THE REQUIRED WIDTH. DOORS IN THE FULLY OPEN POSITION SHALL NOT REDUCE A REQUIRED LANDING DIMENSION BY MORE THAN 7 INCHES.D.A DOOR SERVING INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS IN GROUPS R-2 AND R-3 IS PERMITTED TO OPEN AT THE TOP STEP OF AN INTERIOR FLIGHT OF STAIRS, PROVIDED THE DOOR DOES NOT SWING OVER THE TOP STEP. (C.B.C SECTION 1010.1.5 EXCEPTION 1.1) 17.THRESHOLDS AT DOORWAYS SHALL NOT EXCEED 3 4-INCH IN HEIGHT ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR OR LANDING FOR SLIDING DOORS OR 12-INCH ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR AT OTHER DOORS. THRESHOLDS AND FLOOR LEVEL CHANGES GREATER THAN 14-INCH AT DOORWAYSSHALL BE BEVELED WITH A SLOPE NOT GREATER THAN 1:2 (50% SLOPE.) THRESHOLDS AT SLIDING AND SIDE-HINGED EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UP TO 73 4-INCHES IFTHE DOOR IS NOT PART OF THE REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS, IS NOT PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AND IS NOT PART OF AN ADAPTABLE OR ACCESSIBLE DWELLING UNIT. (C.B.C. SECTION 1010.1.7) 18.STAIRWAYS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS COMPLYING WITH C.B.C. SECTION 1014. STAIRWAYS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE A HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, AND CHANGES IN ROOM ELEVATIONS OF THREE OR FEWER RISERS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS IN GROUP R-3 DONOT REQUIRE HANDRAILS (C.B.C. SECTION 1011.11 EXCEPTIONS 2 & 4) 19.REFER TO SHEETS A6.01 & A6.02 FOR ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS AT ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNITS. 20.INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS APPLIED TO WALLS AND CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CBC SECTION 803 AND TABLE 803.11. 21. ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE OUTLETS ON BRANCH CIRCUITS OF 30 AMPERES OR LESS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED NO MORE THAN 48 INCHES MEASURED FROM TOP THE TOP OF THE RECEPTACLE OUTLET BOX TO THE LEVEL OF THE FINISHED FLOOR OR WORKING PLATFORM. IF THE REACH IS OVER A PHYSICAL BARRIER OR AN OBSTRUCTION (SUCH AS KITCHEN BASE CABINETS), RECEPTACLES SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REACH RANGES SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1138A.3. PHYSICAL BARRIER AND OBSTRUCTION SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 25 INCHES FROM THE WALL BENEATH THE RECEPTACLE. 22. WINDOWS SHALL HAVE CLEAR GLAZING, (PANES OR SHEETS OF GLASS) OR LIGHTLY TINTED GLAZING e.g., LOW EMISSIVITY, SOLAR OR SPANDREL GLAZING (OPAQUE GLASS FOR CONCEALING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ). OTHER TYPES OF MIRROR GLAZING (INCLUDING TINTED OR OPAQUE GLASS) ARE NOT PERMITTED. SKID WALL - REFER TO DETAIL 9/AAD1.1 * | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.7 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 4 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"ENTRY P. TECH LINEN LINENFAMILY ROOM COATS DECK 7'-0"CLR.7'-9"8'-4"7'-0"CLR.951 2'-10"T.O.HANDRAIL 2'-10"3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD T.O. HANDRAIL 9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"ENTRY P. TECH LINEN LINENDECKFAMILY ROOM COATS7'-0"CLR.7'-9"8'-4"7'-0"CLR.2'-10"T.O.HANDRAIL 2'-10"3'-6" MIN.T.O. GUARD T.O. HANDRAIL DATE REVISIONS NO.DESCRIPTION PROJECT MANAGER : DESIGNER : DRAWN BY : REVIEWED BY : 1ST BLDG. DEPT. SUBMITTAL : ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION : JOB NUMBER : CAD FILE NAME : DATE:SHEET: SHEET SCALE: GC MC - 2021068 11/09/21A TOWN - PARCEL FATTACHED DWELLING UNITSANAHEIM, CALENNARIRVINE, CALIFORNIATRACT NO. 17703CITY SUBMITTAL - 2021.11.09DO NOT SCALE PLANS 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA WHA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BEREPRODUCED, CHANGED, OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO A THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF WHA IN THE EVENT OF UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OF THESE PLANS BY ATHIRD PARTY, THE THIRD PARTY SHALL HOLD WHA HARMLESS. C UNIT SECTION PLAN 4 1/4" = 1'-0" - 21068_A2-10 A2.42 1PLAN 4 1PLAN 4 | 2021068 | 11-09-21© 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 FINAL SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL A-3.8 UNIT PLAN 4 | SECTIONS GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME WINDOW SILL WINDOW JAMB INSULATION WHERE OCCURS CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT PER PLAN 4-1/2'' MIN. DBL. 2x6 SILL PLATES 2X6 FRAMING SL. SL. WINDOW HEAD NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT AND CERTIFY THAT EXTERIOR OPENINGS EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER SHALL BE FLASHED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MAKE THEM WEATHER-RESISTANT PER CRC SECTION R703.1, FLASHING AND COUNTER FLASHING. NOTE: SEE DETAIL 1/AD2.1 FOR APPLICATION RECESSED WINDOW INSTALLATION - 2X6 WALL AT STUCCO 3"=1'-0" 3C-WI-WINR2-STO1-00PER ELEV.4-1/2'' MIN.STUCCO PER PLAN 6'' MIN. GYP. BD.6" MIN. PER ELEV.VERIFY WITH STRUCT.GYP. BD. TRANSOM AT WINDOW WINDOW MULLION WINDOW FRAME BOTH SIDES 2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME WINDOW FRAME 1/4"TYP.INSULATION WHERE OCCURS HEADER PER STRUCT. GYP. BD. WINDOW FRAME SLOPE FOAM TO DRAIN (WHERE OCCURS) - TYP. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT INSULATION WHERE OCCURS GYP. BD.2x FRAMING WINDOW FRAME STUCCO (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 2x6 FRAMING (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. 12" FLASHING MEMBRANE 1/4" TYP. 1/4" TYP. STUCCO FLASHING MEMBRANE (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS (2) LAYERS OF W.R.B. STUCCO HEADER PER STRUCT. FLASHING MEMBRANE CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT14"TYP.CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT CONTINUOUS BEAD OF POLYURETHANE SEALANT NOTE: SEE L.A.P. LIST ON SHEET D0.1 12" STRIP OF ELASTOMERIC S.A.M (1) LAYER OF W.R.B.2"MIN.W.R.B. BIBB 1/2" CANT STRIP (3) 2x4 SILL PLATES WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS WHERE OCCURS- SIZE AND SHAPE OF DECORATIVE TRIM PER ELEVATION. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUCTIONS 1 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA 0 2 4 8 A-3.8 PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNIT PLAN 4 | SECTIONS 1x4 FOAM TRIM. 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) 1x4 FOAM (MIN) A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES August 12, 2021 | 2021068 PAGE 1 OF 14 Exterior Color & Materials REVISIONS: Number Date Description 1 8/27/2021 Scheme 2, accent color revised. Application revisions per graphics. 2 2/4/2022 Scheme 4 added per ‘C’ building type. SCHEME 1 OF 14 ‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY Material Color Manufacturer Roofing: Concrete Slate Tile 4634 Kings Canyon Blend Ref: .13 Emi: .94 A.SRI: 16 CRRC: 0918-0044 Eagle Vinyl Windows (factory finish)White Milgard or equal Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish)Bronze RGS Stucco #1 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7566 Westhighland White) Omega Stucco #2 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7016 Mindful Gray) Omega Siding Color (applied to): Corner Boards Lap Siding 1Trim @ Siding SW 2836 Quartersawn Oak Sherwin Williams Trim Color #1 (applied to): Barge Boards 1Beam Eaves Fascia Garage Doors Kickers Outlookers 1Posts SW 7041 Van Dyke Brown Sherwin Williams Trim Color #2 (applied to): 1Stucco Trim @ ‘A’ Elevations SW 7642 Pavestone Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #3 (applied to): Stucco Trim @ ‘B’ Elevations SW 7566 Westhigland White Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #4 (applied to): Metal Railing Secondary Doors SW 7048 Urbane Bronze Sherwin Williams Accent Color (applied to): Unit Doors SW 2810 Rookwood Sash Green Sherwin Williams 1Mechanical Doors Match Adjacent Stucco Color Sherwin Williams Deck Coating TBD Pli-Dek Garage Door Weatherstrip (factory finish)Match Garage Door Color Wayne Dalton NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase. Contact Judith Martinez (949) 250-0607. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES August 12, 2021 | 2021068 PAGE 2 OF 14 Exterior Color & Materials REVISIONS: Number Date Description 1 8/27/2021 Scheme 2, accent color revised. Application revisions per graphics. 2 2/4/2022 Scheme 4 added per ‘C’ building type. SCHEME 2 OF 14 ‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY Material Color Manufacturer Roofing: Concrete Slate Tile 4883 Hillsborough Blend Ref: .17 Emi: .94 A.SRI: 20 CRRC: 0918-0098 Eagle Vinyl Windows (factory finish)White Milgard or equal Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish)Bronze RGS Stucco #1 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7008 Alabaster) Omega Stucco #2 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7506 Loggia) Omega Siding Color (applied to): Corner Boards Lap Siding 1Trim @ Siding SW 6257 Gibraltar Sherwin Williams Trim Color #1 (applied to): Barge Boards 1Beam Eaves Fascia Garage Doors Kickers Outlookers 1Posts SW 7645 Thunder Gray Sherwin Williams Trim Color #2 (applied to): 1Stucco Trim @ ‘A’ Elevations SW 7633 Taupe Tone Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #3 (applied to): Stucco Trim @ ‘B’ Elevations SW 7008 Alabaster Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #4 (applied to): Metal Railing Secondary Doors SW 7048 Urbane Bronze Sherwin Williams Accent Color (applied to): Unit Doors 1SW 2838 Polished Mahogany Sherwin Williams 1Mechanical Doors Match Adjacent Stucco Color Sherwin Williams Deck Coating TBD Pli-Dek Garage Door Weatherstrip (factory finish)Match Garage Door Color Wayne Dalton NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase. Contact Judith Martinez (949) 250-0607. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES August 12, 2021 | 2021068 PAGE 3 OF 14 Exterior Color & Materials REVISIONS: Number Date Description 1 8/27/2021 Scheme 2, accent color revised. Application revisions per graphics. 2 2/4/2022 Scheme 4 added per ‘C’ building type. SCHEME 3 OF 14 ‘A’ & ‘B’ ELEVATIONS ONLY Material Color Manufacturer Roofing: Concrete Slate Tile SCB 8827 Tacoma Blend Ref: .15 Emi: .92 A.SRI: 17 CRRC: 0918-0047 Eagle Vinyl Windows (factory finish)White Milgard or equal Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish)Bronze RGS Stucco #1 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7562 Roman Column) Omega Stucco #2 (16/20 sand finish) TBD (Similar to Sherwin Williams SW 7051 Analytical Gray) Omega Siding Color (applied to): Corner Boards Lap Siding 1Trim @ Siding SW 7622 Homburg Gray Sherwin Williams Trim Color #1 (applied to): Barge Boards 1Beam Eaves Fascia Garage Doors Kickers Outlookers 1Posts SW 7034 Status Bronze Sherwin Williams Trim Color #2 (applied to): 1Stucco Trim @ ‘A’ Elevations SW 7045 Intellectual Gray Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #3 (applied to): Stucco Trim @ ‘B’ Elevations SW 7562 Roman Column Sherwin Williams 1Trim Color #4 (applied to): Metal Railing Secondary Doors SW 7048 Urbane Bronze Sherwin Williams Accent Color (applied to): Unit Doors SW 6118 Leather Bound Sherwin Williams 1Mechanical Doors Match Adjacent Stucco Color Sherwin Williams Deck Coating TBD Pli-Dek Garage Door Weatherstrip (factory finish)Match Garage Door Color Wayne Dalton NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase. Contact Judith Martinez (949) 250-0607. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. Exterior Color & Materials REVISIONS: Number Date Description 1 8/27/2021 Scheme 2, accent color revised. Application revisions per graphics. 2 2/4/2022 Scheme 4 added per ‘C’ building type. SCHEME 4 OF 14 A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES February 4, 2022 | 2021068 PAGE 4 OF 14 ‘C’ ELEVATIONS ONLY Material Color Manufacturer TPO Roofing (factory finish) White Ref: .79 Emi: .85 A.SRI: 83 CRRC: 0608-0008 Firestone Vinyl Windows (factory finish)TBD TBD Gutters & Downspouts (factory finish)TBD TBD Brick (standard raked joints)Ebony Black - Utility Belden Mortar @ Brick TBD TBD Stucco Color #1 SW 7551 Greek Villa Sherwin Williams Stucco Color #2 SW 7017 Dorian Gray Sherwin Williams Siding Color (applied to): Horizontal Siding SW 6236 Grays Harbor Sherwin Williams Trim Color #1 (applied to): French Doors Garage Doors Unit Doors SW 2807 Rookwood Medium Brown Sherwin Williams Trim Color #2 (applied to): Metal Railing SW 6258 Tricorn Black Sherwin Williams Mechanical Doors Match Adjacent Stucco Color Sherwin Williams Deck Coating TBD Pli-Dek Garage Door Weatherstrip (factory finish)Match Garage Door Color TBD NOTE: Notify WHA if any variation occurs between these schemes and the construction documents prior to purchase. Contact Judith Martinez (949) 250-0607. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA. SCHEME 1 For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA ROOFING FASCIA A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES February 4, 2022 | 2021068 ‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only STUCCO #1 TRIM #3 LAP SIDING @ ‘A’ ELEVATIONS ONLY ACCENT COLOR STUCCO#2 TRIM COLOR #1 TRIM #2 TRIM COLOR #4 SCHEME 2 For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA ROOFING FASCIA A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES February 4, 2022 | 2021068 ‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only STUCCO #1 TRIM #3 LAP SIDING @ ‘A’ ELEVATIONS ONLY ACCENT COLOR STUCCO#2 TRIM COLOR #1 TRIM #2 TRIM COLOR #4 SCHEME 3 For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA ROOFING FASCIA A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES February 4, 2022 | 2021068 ‘A’ & ‘B’ Elevations Only STUCCO #1 TRIM #3 LAP SIDING @ ‘A’ ELEVATIONS ONLY ACCENT COLOR STUCCO#2 TRIM COLOR #1 TRIM #2 TRIM COLOR #4 SCHEME 4 For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F Anaheim, California LENNAR HOMES February 4, 2022 | 2021068 BRICK GARAGE DOORS UNIT DOORS METAL RAILING HORIZONTAL SIDING STUCCO COLOR #2 ‘C’ Elevations Only STUCCO COLOR #1 | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA CM-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES SCHEME 1 4 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color SCHEME 1 4 PLEX - ‘B’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color SCHEME 1 5 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES SCHEME 2 4 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #4 Accent ColorTrim Color #3 SCHEME 2 4 PLEX - ‘B’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color SCHEME 2 5 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA CM-2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 4 PLEX / 5 PLEX | COLOR STUDIES Note: Artist’s Conception; Colors, Materials And Application May Vary. © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color 5 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCHEME 3 Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES SCHEME 3 4 PLEX - ‘A’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #2 Trim Color #4 Accent Color Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right © 2021 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. | 2021068 | 08-27-21 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Roofing Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color Trim Color #1 Trim Color #4 Accent ColorTrim Color #3 SCHEME 3 4 PLEX - ‘B’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right COLOR STUDY For exact color refer to manufacturer actual samples. © 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA | 2021068 | 02-04-22 A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIALENNAR HOMES Stucco #1 Stucco #2 Siding Color BrickTrim Color #2Trim Color #1 SCHEME 4 4 PLEX - ‘C’ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Note: Artist’s conception; colors, materials and application may vary. Front Rear Left Right | 2021068 | 07-06-22© 2022 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. DBA WHA A TOWN PARCEL F - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES ANAHEIM, CA CM-3 PLANNING COMMISSION SET 4 PLEX / 5 PLEX | COLOR STUDIES 152.46 Light Pole152.63 Traf Sig Vault151.85 Irrig Box151.81 Irrig Box151.31 Sign151.40 SD MH Cover151.70 Tel MH Cover151.86 Light Pole151.92 Traf Sig Vault152.14 Water Meter152.11 Water Meter152.02 Light Pole151.80 CATV Box151.42 SD MH Cover151.52 Sign151.68 Irrig Box151.77 Light Pole151.80 Traf Sig Vault152.08 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.00 Conc Edge152.01 Conc Edge151.87 Vent Riser148.50 FH148.76 SD MH Cover149.32 Light Pole149.38 Traf Sig Vault151.53 Water Meter152.13 Traf Sig Vault151.95 Light Pole152.69 FH153.69 Sign154.21 Irrig Box154.23 Irrig Box153.83 Light Pole154.03 Traf Sig Vault153.73 Irrig Box153.01 Irrig Box153.05 Irrig Box153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.95 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.98 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.75 Water Meter152.80 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.81 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.90 Elec Riser152.89 Elec Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.54 Elec Meter151.87 SD MH Cover151.84 Sign151.78 Elec Meter151.49 SD MH Cover151.81 Water Meter152.02 Irrig Box152.19 Irrig Box152.14 Irrig Box152.06 Sign152.00 Light Pole152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.14 FH152.13 Conc Edge152.15 Conc Edge152.11 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.11 Elec Meter152.10 Elec Meter152.06 Vent Riser151.87 Vent Riser151.84 Irrig Box151.93 Elec Vault151.91 Elec Vault152.00 Elec Vault152.02 Elec Vault151.98 Elec MH151.85 Sign151.83 Elec Vault151.72 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Vault151.84 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Meter151.77 Vault151.73 Vault151.78 Vault151.80 Vault151.81 Traf Sig Vault151.40 SD MH Cover151.89 Sign151.60 Light Pole151.72 Irrig Box151.75 Irrig Box151.79 Traf Sig Vault152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.83 Irrig Box152.80 Irrig BoxUNION STREET PARK STREETMERIDIANSTREET(PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)*********************METRO (PRIVATE) DRIVE************************************WHC-1SITE PLANSHEETFINAL SITE PLANA-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA FLOT 5, TRACT 17703City of AnaheimDATE:07/06/22*PLANNING COMMISSION SET WHUNION STREET PARK STREETMERIDIANSTREET(PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)*********************METRO (PRIVATE) DRIVE152.46 Light Pole152.63 Traf Sig Vault151.85 Irrig Box151.81 Irrig Box151.31 Sign151.40 SD MH Cover151.70 Tel MH Cover151.86 Light Pole151.92 Traf Sig Vault152.14 Water Meter152.11 Water Meter152.02 Light Pole151.80 CATV Box151.42 SD MH Cover151.52 Sign151.68 Irrig Box151.77 Light Pole151.80 Traf Sig Vault152.08 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.00 Conc Edge152.01 Conc Edge151.87 Vent Riser148.50 FH148.76 SD MH Cover149.32 Light Pole149.38 Traf Sig Vault151.53 Water Meter152.13 Traf Sig Vault151.95 Light Pole152.69 FH153.69 Sign154.21 Irrig Box154.23 Irrig Box153.83 Light Pole154.03 Traf Sig Vault153.73 Irrig Box153.01 Irrig Box153.05 Irrig Box153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.95 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.98 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.75 Water Meter152.80 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.81 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.90 Elec Riser152.89 Elec Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.54 Elec Meter151.87 SD MH Cover151.84 Sign151.78 Elec Meter151.49 SD MH Cover151.81 Water Meter152.02 Irrig Box152.19 Irrig Box152.14 Irrig Box152.06 Sign152.00 Light Pole152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.14 FH152.13 Conc Edge152.15 Conc Edge152.11 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.11 Elec Meter152.10 Elec Meter152.06 Vent Riser151.87 Vent Riser151.84 Irrig Box151.93 Elec Vault151.91 Elec Vault152.00 Elec Vault152.02 Elec Vault151.98 Elec MH151.85 Sign151.83 Elec Vault151.72 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Vault151.84 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Meter151.77 Vault151.73 Vault151.78 Vault151.80 Vault151.81 Traf Sig Vault151.40 SD MH Cover151.89 Sign151.60 Light Pole151.72 Irrig Box151.75 Irrig Box151.79 Traf Sig Vault152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.83 Irrig Box152.80 Irrig Box************************************62'31'10'21'Setback3'Possible 3' UseEncroachment(Refer to PTMUOverlay Zone)10'SECTION 3-313'8'31'10'21'Setback3'Possible 3' UseEncroachment(Refer to PTMUOverlay Zone)10'13'8'Parallel ParkingResidentialResidentialLandscape AreaLandscape AreaSidewalk with Tree wellsParallel ParkingParkway or Parkway Trees in Tree GratesSidewalk5'5'(PRIVATE)*PORTION OF UNION STREETLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENTLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENT*Refer to Notes regarding Private Street Easements62'31'10'21'Setback3'Possible 3' UseEncroachment(Refer to PTMUOverlay Zone)10'SECTION 1-113'8'31'10'21'Setback3'Possible 3' UseEncroachment(Refer to PTMUOverlay Zone)10'13'8'Parallel ParkingResidentialResidentialLandscape AreaParkway or Parkway Trees in Tree GratesLandscape AreaSidewalkParallel ParkingParkway or Parkway Trees in Tree GratesSidewalk5'5'5'5'PARK STREET(PRIVATE)**Refer to Notes regarding Private Street Easements54'31'10'Setback3'Possible 3' UseEncroachment(Refer to PTMUOverlay Zone)PORTION OF UNION STREET 13'13'8'Park SiteSECTION 2-2FROM MERIDIAN ST. TO PARK ST.Residential5'23'5'10'10' Sidewalk8' Parkway5' Sidewalk5' ParkwayLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENTLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENTLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENTLIMITS OFPRIVATE ST.EASEMENT(PRIVATE)*UP TO MERIDIAN STREET INTERSECTION*Refer to Notes regarding Private Street EasementsSECTION B-BN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION A-AN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION C-CN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION D-DN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION E-EN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION F-FN.T.S.(PRIVATE)SECTION G-GN.T.S.SECTION H-HN.T.S.SECTION I-IN.T.S.SHEETFINAL SITE PLANA-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA FLOT 5, TRACT 17703City of AnaheimDATE:07/06/22SITE STREET SECTIONSEXISTING PRIVATE STREETSC-2PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN*PLANNING COMMISSION SET UNION STREET PARK STREETMERIDIANSTREET(PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)METRO (PRIVATE) DRIVE************************************G G G G GGGGGGGGGG GGG GFWH SHEETFINAL SITE PLANA-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA FLOT 5, TRACT 17703City of AnaheimDATE:07/06/22C-3PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLANPLANNING COMMISSION SET WHUNION STREET PARK STREETMERIDIANSTREET(PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)METRO (PRIVATE) DRIVE152.46 Light Pole152.63 Traf Sig Vault151.85 Irrig Box151.81 Irrig Box151.31 Sign151.40 SD MH Cover151.70 Tel MH Cover151.86 Light Pole151.92 Traf Sig Vault152.14 Water Meter152.11 Water Meter152.02 Light Pole151.80 CATV Box151.42 SD MH Cover151.52 Sign151.68 Irrig Box151.77 Light Pole151.80 Traf Sig Vault152.08 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.00 Conc Edge152.01 Conc Edge151.87 Vent Riser148.50 FH148.76 SD MH Cover149.32 Light Pole149.38 Traf Sig Vault151.53 Water Meter152.13 Traf Sig Vault151.95 Light Pole152.69 FH153.69 Sign154.21 Irrig Box154.23 Irrig Box153.83 Light Pole154.03 Traf Sig Vault153.73 Irrig Box153.01 Irrig Box153.05 Irrig Box153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.95 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.98 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.75 Water Meter152.80 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.81 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.90 Elec Riser152.89 Elec Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.54 Elec Meter151.87 SD MH Cover151.84 Sign151.78 Elec Meter151.49 SD MH Cover151.81 Water Meter152.02 Irrig Box152.19 Irrig Box152.14 Irrig Box152.06 Sign152.00 Light Pole152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.14 FH152.13 Conc Edge152.15 Conc Edge152.11 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.11 Elec Meter152.10 Elec Meter152.06 Vent Riser151.87 Vent Riser151.84 Irrig Box151.93 Elec Vault151.91 Elec Vault152.00 Elec Vault152.02 Elec Vault151.98 Elec MH151.85 Sign151.83 Elec Vault151.72 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Vault151.84 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Meter151.77 Vault151.73 Vault151.78 Vault151.80 Vault151.81 Traf Sig Vault151.40 SD MH Cover151.89 Sign151.60 Light Pole151.72 Irrig Box151.75 Irrig Box151.79 Traf Sig Vault152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.83 Irrig Box152.80 Irrig Box************************************SHEETFINAL SITE PLANA-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA FLOT 5, TRACT 17703City of AnaheimDATE:07/06/22C-4WASTE MANAGEMENTPLANNING COMMISSION SET WHUNION STREET PARK STREETMERIDIANSTREET(PRIVATE)UNION STREET(PRIVATE)(PRIVATE)*********************METRO (PRIVATE) DRIVE152.46 Light Pole152.63 Traf Sig Vault151.85 Irrig Box151.81 Irrig Box151.31 Sign151.40 SD MH Cover151.70 Tel MH Cover151.86 Light Pole151.92 Traf Sig Vault152.14 Water Meter152.11 Water Meter152.02 Light Pole151.80 CATV Box151.42 SD MH Cover151.52 Sign151.68 Irrig Box151.77 Light Pole151.80 Traf Sig Vault152.08 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.00 Conc Edge152.01 Conc Edge151.87 Vent Riser148.50 FH148.76 SD MH Cover149.32 Light Pole149.38 Traf Sig Vault151.53 Water Meter152.13 Traf Sig Vault151.95 Light Pole152.69 FH153.69 Sign154.21 Irrig Box154.23 Irrig Box153.83 Light Pole154.03 Traf Sig Vault153.73 Irrig Box153.01 Irrig Box153.05 Irrig Box153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve153.02 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.95 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.98 Water-Dbl Det Ck Valve152.75 Water Meter152.80 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.81 Water Riser152.82 Water Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.90 Elec Riser152.89 Elec Riser152.92 Elec Riser152.54 Elec Meter151.87 SD MH Cover151.84 Sign151.78 Elec Meter151.49 SD MH Cover151.81 Water Meter152.02 Irrig Box152.19 Irrig Box152.14 Irrig Box152.06 Sign152.00 Light Pole152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.14 FH152.13 Conc Edge152.15 Conc Edge152.11 Conc Edge152.09 Conc Edge152.11 Elec Meter152.10 Elec Meter152.06 Vent Riser151.87 Vent Riser151.84 Irrig Box151.93 Elec Vault151.91 Elec Vault152.00 Elec Vault152.02 Elec Vault151.98 Elec MH151.85 Sign151.83 Elec Vault151.72 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Vault151.84 Elec Vault151.73 Elec Meter151.77 Vault151.73 Vault151.78 Vault151.80 Vault151.81 Traf Sig Vault151.40 SD MH Cover151.89 Sign151.60 Light Pole151.72 Irrig Box151.75 Irrig Box151.79 Traf Sig Vault152.30 Traf Sig Vault152.83 Irrig Box152.80 Irrig Box153.19 Irrig Box************************************SHEETFINAL SITE PLANA-TOWN DEVELOPMENT AREA FLOT 5, TRACT 17703City of AnaheimDATE:07/06/22C-5FIRE ACCESS PLANPLANNING COMMISSION SET Rhaphiolepis sp./ Indian Hawthorne (L) Rosa floribunda ‘Iceberg’/ Iceberg Rose (M) Rosmarinus sp./ Rosemary (L) Salvia greggii/Autumn Sage (L) Westringia sp./ Rosemary (L) Xylosma congestum/ Shiny Xylosma (L) Yucca sp./ Yucca (L/VL) LEGEND Pocket Park - Refer to Sheet L-3 Existing Off-site Streetscapes Private Patio Rec Center - Refer to Sheet L-2 Existing Block Wall at Property Line Perimeter Wall (6’-8’ Ht. Decorative Masonry Wall) Screening Hedge Canopy Trees Loading Area AC Screening Fence Removable Screening Fence 3 7 4 8 9 10 11 2 6 4 1 5 LIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK LIMIT OF WORK 8 8 6 3 5 83 2 1 1110 2 7 2 3 3 10 11 9 PALM TREES TREES SHRUBS SHRUBS (CONTINUE) GROUNDCOVER VINES / ESPALIERS CANOPY TREES VERTICAL ACCENT VERTICAL EVERGREEN FLOWERING ACCENT SPECIMEN TREE PROPOSED PLANTING LIST Cercidium ‘Desert Museum’ / Desert Museum Palo Verde (VL) Cinnamomum camphora / Camphor Tree (M) Cupaniopsis anacardiodes / Carrotwood Tree (M) Magnolia grandiflora / Southern Magnolia (M) Platanus acerifolia / London Plane Tree (M) Prosopis alba / Mesquite (L) Quercus virginiana / Southern Live Oak (M) Rhus lancea / African Somac (L) Ulmus parvifolia / Chinese Elm (M) Phoenix dactylifera / Date Palm (L) Washingtonia robusta / Mexican Fan Palm (L) Botanical Name / Common Name (WUCOLS) (WUCOLS) (WUCOLS) (WUCOLS)(WUCOLS) Botanical Name / Common Name Botanical Name / Common Name Botanical Name / Common Name Botanical Name / Common Name Bambusa sp. / Bamboo (Clumping variaties only) (M) Tristania conferta / Brisbane Box (M) Pinus canariensis / Canary Island Pine (L) Pinus halepensis / Afghan Pine (L) Pinus pinea / Stone Pine (L) Bauhinia variegata / Purple Orchid Tree (M) Jacaranda mimosifolia / Jacaranda (M) Lagerstroemia indica / Crape Myrtle(M) Pyrus calleryana / Bradford Pear (M) Cercidium ‘Desert Museum’ / Desert Museum Palo Verde (VL) Erythrina caffra / Coral Tree(L) Olea europea / Olive (L) Bougainvillea sp./ NCN (L) Calliandra haematocephala/ Pink Powder Puff (M) Pandorea jasminoides/ Bower Vine (M) Podocarpus gracilor/ Fern Pine (M) Stephanotis floribunda/ Madagascar Jasmine (M) Trachelospermum jasminoides/ Star Jasmine (M) Bougainvillea sp./ NCN (L) Carex divulsa/ Berkeley Sedge (L) Carissa m. ‘Green Carpet’/ Natal Plum (L) Dianella revoluta ‘Little Rev’/ Dianella(L) Festuca sp./ Fescue (L) Lantana sp./ Lantana(L) Lonicera j. ‘Halliana’/ Honeysuckle (L) Myoporum ‘Pacificum’/ NCN (L) Rosmarinus o. ‘Prostratus’/ Prostrate Rosemary (L) Senecio sp./ NCN (M) Trachelospermum jasminoides/ Star Jasmine (M) NOTE: WUCOLS Region 3 (South Coastal) Agapanthus sp./ Lily of the Nile (M) Agave sp./ Agave (VL) Aloe sp./ Aloe (L) Anigozanthos sp./ Kangaroo Paw (M) Bougainvillea sp./Bougainvillea (L) Buxus sp./ Boxwood (M) Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’/ Dwarf Callistemon (L) Carissa macrocarpa ‘Tuttle’/ Dwarf Natal Plum (L) Ceanothus ‘Frosty Blue’/ California Lilac (L) Cistus x. purpureus/ Orchid Rockrose (L) Cordyline sp./ NCN (M/L) Dianella sp./ Flax Lily (L) Dietes sp./ Fortnight Lily (L) Dodonaea v. purpurea/ Purple Hopseed Bush (L) Euonymus sp./ Euonymus (M) Festuca mairei/ Atlas Fescue (L) Hemerocallis sp./ Daylily (M) Hesperaloe parviflora/ Red Yucca (VL) Heteromeles arbutifolia/ Toyon (VL) Laurus nobilis/ Sweet Boy (L) Lavandula sp./ Lavender (L) Leucophyllum sp./ Purple Sage (L) Ligustrum j. ‘Texanum’ / Texas Privet (M) Lomandra sp./ NCN (M/L) Muhlenbergia sp/ Deer Grass (M/L) Nassella tenuissima/ Mexican Feather Grass (L) Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’/ Little Ollie Olive (L) Osmanthus fragrans/ Osmanthus (M) Philodendron sp./ Philodendron (M) Phormium sp./ New Zealand Flax (L) Photinia x. fraseri/ Fraser’s Photinia (M) Pittosporum sp./ Mock Orange (M) Podocarpus macrophyllus/ Yew Pine (M) PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTYUNION STREET0 15’30’60’ Scale: 1”= 30’-0” KEYMAP (N.T.S.) 22’ ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-1 PLANNING COMMISSION SET CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN AND PLANT LIST 6’-0”6’-0”REC CENTER Pool Building with Restrooms, Showers and Pool/Spa Equipment Rec Center Entry Portal Pool (44’x16’, 704 sf) Spa (16’x9’, 144 sf) Spa Backdrop Wall with Decorative Spillways Pool Safety Fence Date Palm Chaise Lounges Dining Table Soft Seating SCALE: 3/4”=1’-0” Stucco finish. Color to match pool building. SCALE: 1/2”=1’-0” SCALE: 3/4”=1’-0”SCALE: 3/4”=1’-0” 3 6 7 8 9 10 2 5 1 3 1 4 10 9 6 6 8 7 5 4 2 PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTY UNION STREETKEYMAP (N.T.S.) 0 4’8’16’ Scale: 1/8”= 1’-0” ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-2 PLANNING COMMISSION SET REC CENTER ENLARGEMENT 6’ POOL GLASS FENCE 6’ POOL GLASS GATE 6’ POOL ENCLOUSRE WALL POOL DECK OPTIONS ACCENT TILE OPTIONSSPA ACCENT WALL Davis Colors - Pebble #64, Topcast #05 Davis Colors - San Diego Buff #5237, Topcast #05 POCKET PARK Open Lawn Area Large Tree Bench Overhead Trellis with Tables Accent Tree Screen Hedge Existing Off-site Streetscape3 6 7 2 51 4 PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTY UNION STREETKEYMAP (N.T.S.) 1 7 4 5 2 3 6 7 PARK STREET UNION STREET0 4’8’16’ Scale: 1/8”= 1’-0” ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-3 PLANNING COMMISSION SET POCKET PARK ENLARGEMENT DOG PLAY PICNIC TABLE CORNHOLE OVERHEAD STRUCTURE WITH DECORATIVE PANNEL 6510 W 91st Ave, Suite 100Westminster, CO 80031(303) 589-4524hello@parasoleil.comwww.parasoleil.comDublevey (DUB)©The first iteration of this pattern was called Victorian Arms, but proved, after testing, to be less thanstructural. Dublevey abstracts the core elements of that pattern and creates modern canvas that floatswith a repeated collection of a dozen similar shapes. Use on its own or as an accent. Shade Score 6/10 Privacy Score 7/10 Biomimicry Score 6/10 Structural Strength Score 9/10 Small Hole Size Score 5/10 MESH Score 1/10 Openness 14% Open ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Guardrail Compliant (4" sphere)• All Parasoleil patterns, products, and designs are copyright/trademark/patent protected. Any unauthorized use, including representation, production, or manufacturing, is prohibited under law. IRRIGATION DATA LEGEND Pool/Spa Water Use High Water Use Medium Water Use Low Hydrozone:Eto: KL LA Sq. Ft. Conversion SLA Sq. Ft. MAWA Landscaped Area 49.7 0.55 34,216        0.62 NA 579,883                  MAWA= Maximum Applied Water Allowance (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) 0.50= Evapotraspiration Adjustment Factor (ETAF) 1.0= ETAF for Sprcial Landscaped Area LA= Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) 0.3= the additional ET adjustment Factor for Special Landscape Area (1.0‐ 0.7= 0.3) SLA= Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Applicant to fill in boxes below: Eto (Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C inches per year) Landscaped Area includes Special Landscape Area (square feet) Speical Landscape Area (square feet) Hydrozone:Eto: KL Sq. Ft. Conversion IE EAWU Low Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.2 16,443        0.62 0.80 126,669                  Medium Water Use Shrubs (Drip)49.7 0.5 15,343        0.62 0.85 278,105                  High Water Use (Rotor)49.7 0.8 1,582          0.62 0.70 55,712                    High (Water Feature)49.7 1.0 848             0.62 1.00 26,130                    Total EAWU:34,216        486,616                  EAWU= Estimated Applied Water Use (gallons per year) Eto= Reference Evapotranspiration from Appendix C (inches per year) KI= Landscape Coefficient LA= Landscaped Area (square feet) 0.62= Conversion Factor (to gallons per square foot) IE= Irrigation Efficiency= IME X DU (See definication in Appendix E for exmaplne IE percentages) IME= Irrigation Management Efficiency (90%) DU= Distribution Uniformity of Irrigation Head KI= Ks x Kc x Kmc Ks= species factor (range 1.0‐ 0.9) (see WUCOLS list for values) Kd= density factor (range 0.5‐ 1.3) (see WUCOLS list for density value) Kmc= microclimatic factor (range 0.5‐ 1.4) (see WUCOLS) Table A‐ PF (Plant Factor) Cool Season Turf= 0.8 Warm Season Turf= 0.7 High Water Use Plants= 0.7 (can be between 0.7‐0.9) Moderate Water Use Plants= 0.5 (can be between 0.4‐0.6) Low Water Use Plants= 0.3 (can be between 0.1‐0.3) Very Low Water Use Plants= 0.1 IE (Irrigation Efficiency)‐ Appendix E Pop‐up Stream Rotor= 0.75 Rotor Head= 0.75 Microspray= 0.75 Bubblers= 0.8 Drip Emitters= 0.85 Subsurface Irrigation= 0.9 Project Name:  A‐Town Development Area F, Lot 5, Tract 17703, Anaheim, CA WATER EFFICIENT WORK SHEET Total EAWU = (Eto x KL x LA in Sq.ft. / IE)= Gallons per Year 49.7                           34,216  0 Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) Estimated Annual Water Use: Total MAWA = (Eto x 0.50 x LA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)+(Eto x 1.0 x SLA in Sq.ft. x 0.62)= Gallons per year for LA + SLA Date:  Nov 09, 2021 Irrigation Note: All planting areas shall have a fully automatic irrigation system. Utilization water conserving features such as lowprecipitation rate heads; low-flow micro sprays or drip irrigation, water sensors and multi-program controllers with weather station capability and drip circuit features. “Water Efficient Landscapes” irrigation system, scheduling and water use WELO calculations shall be designed to meet the requirements of Chapter 10.19 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ordinance No. 6355.LIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTYUNION STREETKEYMAP (N.T.S.) ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-4 PLANNING COMMISSION SET IRRIGATION PLAN 0 15’30’60’ Scale: 1”= 30’-0” RECREATION-LEISURE AREA SUMMARY TOTAL AREA PROVIDED: 29,036 SQ.FT. LEGEND Common Recreation-Leisure Area Private Balcony Area Common Recreation-Leisure Area (Minimum dimension of 10 feet) 20,336 sq.ft. Private Balconies* (Located above the ground floor/ Minimum 70 sq.ft. with minimum dimension of 7 feet) 8,700 sq.ft. Required: 73 DUs x 200 sf =14,600 sf * Refer to Architecture Plans for Percise Location and Dimension Information: - Plan 1 – sheet A-3.1 - Plan 2 – sheet A-3.3 - Plan 3 – sheet A-3.5 - Plan 4 – sheet A-3.7 LEGENDTYPICAL LANDSCAPING AREA BETWEEN STRUCTURES STUDY Scale: 1/8”=1’-0”Planting Area Between Structures Total Area Between Structures Total Area Between Structures: 1,846 sf 40% Required Landscape: 738 sf Provided Landscaping:740sfLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORKLIMIT OF WORK PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTYUNION STREETRec Center 7699 sq.ft. Pocket Park 4154 sq.ft. KEYMAP (N.T.S.)20’-0”Setback6’-0”Patio6’-0”Patio48”48”42” PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTY UNION STREETAPPLICABLE LOCATION ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-5 PLANNING COMMISSION SET RECREATION-LEISURE PLAN 0 15’30’60’ Scale: 1”= 30’-0” TYPICAL LANDSCAPING AREA BETWEEN STRUCTURES STUDY Canopy Tree Hedge Shrub Accent Shrub Vine Flowering Groundcover Low Groundcover Vertical Accent Tree Flowering Accent Tree 48”48”42” 2 3 14 Decorative Panel Accent Shrub Hedge Background Canopy Tree Pattern: Herrigbone 3x9 Color: Buff (30%) Tan (70%) Tan Buff 3 4 2 1 Magnolia grandiflora / Southern Magnolia (M) Arbutus unedo / Strawberry Tree (M) Lagerstroemia indica / Crape Myrtle(M) Jacaranda mimosifolia / Jacaranda (M) Pyrus calleryana / Bradford Pear (M) Podocarpus macrophyllus/ Yew Pine (M) Podocarpus elongatus ‘Ice Blue’ / Blue Ice Yellowwood (M) Dianella revoluta ‘Little Rev’/ Dianella(L) Festuca sp./ Fescue (L) Lantana sp./ Lantana(L) Senecio sp./ NCN (M) Trachelospermum jasminoides/ Star Jasmine (M) Bougainvillea sp./ NCN (L) Carissa m. ‘Green Carpet’/ Natal Plum (L) Lonicera j. ‘Halliana’/ Honeysuckle (L) Myoporum ‘Pacificum’/ NCN (L) Rosmarinus o. ‘Prostratus’/ Prostrate Rosemary (L) Agapanthus sp./ Lily of the Nile (M) Agave sp./ Agave (VL) Aloe sp./ Aloe (L) Anigozanthos sp./ Kangaroo Paw Dianella sp./ Flax Lily (L) Dietes sp./ Fortnight Lily (L) Hemerocallis sp./ Daylily (M) Hesperaloe parviflora/ Red Yucca (VL) Lavandula sp./ Lavender (L) Buxus sp./ Boxwood (M) Heteromeles arbutifolia/ Toyon (VL) Laurus nobilis/ Sweet Boy (L) Leucophyllum sp./ Purple Sage (L) Ligustrum j. ‘Texanum’ / Texas Privet (M) Olea europaea ‘Little Ollie’/ Little Ollie Olive (L) Bougainvillea sp./ NCN (L) Calliandra haematocephala/ Pink Powder Puff (M) Pandorea jasminoides/ Bower Vine (M) Podocarpus gracilor/ Fern Pine (M) Stephanotis floribunda/ Madagascar Jasmine (M) Trachelospermum jasminoides/ Star Jasmine (M) PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTY UNION STREETAPPLICABLE LOCATION ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-6 PLANNING COMMISSION SET Artisan Panel Alley Accent View Patio Area View Accent Shrub Ligustrum Hedge Background AC SCREENING FENCE REMOVABLE SCREENING FENCE VEHICULAR PAVING RESIDENTIAL ALLEY DESIGN ALLEY ACCENT WITH DECORATIVE PANELS LEGEND PLANTING LEGEND UNION STREETUNION ST R E E T U N I O N S T R E E T A B 22’-0”22’-0” 22’- 0 ” LEGEND Fire Department Connection Screening Hedge Canopy Tree Domestic Water Meter and Backflow Prevention Device 3 2 1 1 4 1 22 2 4 2 3 3 3 PARK STREET SO CAL GAS PROPERTY UNION STREETKEYMAP (N.T.S.) 4 4 2 36”36”24”24”A ANAHEIM, CA PARCEL F - 07.06.2022 L-7 PLANNING COMMISSION SET ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES SCREENING AND SIGHT TRIANGLE STUDY View A View B Entry Elevation A Scale: 1/8”=1’-0” LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGENDELECTRICAL DEVICE LEGENDJUNCTION BOXWR RATED - GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLEW/ IN USE WEATHERPROOF COVERWPJELECTRICAL PANELSINGLE POLE SWITCHELECTRICAL KEY NOTESJUNDERGROUND PULL BOXTRANSFORMERTLANDSCAPING18" MINNONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT)LOW VOLTAGE (>30V)LANDSCAPE LIGHTINGDIRECT BURIAL CABLE6" MINSTREETS, HIGHWAYS,ROADS ALLEYS,DRIVEWAYS, ANDPARKING LOTS24" MINNONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT),RIGID METAL CONDUITAND DIRECT BURIAL CABLESRIGID METAL CONDUITOR INTERMEDIATEMETAL CONDUITMINIMUM COVER REQUIREMENTS2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITINDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL)3 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT2 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITIRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMPIRRIGATION CONTROLLERBP1.EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING CONDUCTORS TO BE # 12 THHN/THWN-2 CU IN 3/4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MINIMUM COVER PER NEC 300.5(A) (SEE THIS SHEET)2.UNDERGROUND PULL BOXES ARE TO BE SIZE 3-1/2. ADDITIONAL PULL BOXES MAY BE NEEDED THANCURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO HELP IN PULLING THE CONDUCTORS DURING INSTALLATION. THECOVER OF THE PULL BOXES ARE TO BE MARKED WITH "ELECTRIC".3.SPLICES AND TAPS SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES OR POLE BASE HAND HOLES ONLY.4.REFER TO THE DRY UTILITY CONSULTANT PLANS OR SERVING UTILITY PLANS TO CONFIRM THE SERVICELOCATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UNDERGROUND WORK.5.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 3/16" MIN. PULL ROPE IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS OR SLEEVES.6.UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS LOCAL CODES OR THE SOILS REPORTREQUIRE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONDUIT.7.THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST NEVER HAVE A GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE (WALL LIGHT, POLELIGHT, BOLLARD, ETC.) WIRED AFTER AN ACCENT LIGHT SUCH THAT IF THE ACCENT LIGHT WAS REMOVEDOR DAMAGED IT WOULD AFFECT THE GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE'S POWER.8.THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST FLIP THE CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OFF BEFORE ANY MAINTENANCE ORREPLACEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL FIXTURE, LAMP, DEVICE OR CONTROLLER.9.IF GATES FOR PEDESTRIANS AND/OR VEHICLES ARE TO BE INSTALLED; THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ISTO COORDINATE WITH THE GATE CONTRACTOR(S) TO MAKE SURE ANY NECESSARY CONDUITS, CIRCUITSOR WIRING ARE TO BE INSTALLED OTHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ALSO, LOW VOLTAGECONDUIT MAY ALSO BE NEEDED FOR ACCESS CONTROL. COORDINATE ON LOCATION AND REQUIREMENTSFOR KNOX BOX, PROVIDE EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED.10. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALLDESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASEDUPON A 40-AMPERE MINIMUM BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED.11. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVEDEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITHCALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE.ELECTRICAL PANEL IDENTIFICATIONHP1H..-XCIRCUIT IDENTIFIERCIRCUIT NUMBERPANEL IDENTIFICATIONVD=X.X%VOLTAGE DROPH..-X212H..-X310H..-X210ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTALEXTERIOR SITE ELECTRICAL NOTESA215W. LED 36" TALL BOLLARDTYPE II DISTRIBUTION3500 DEGREE K LAMPKIM# CBXX-15L-35K-UV-FINISH OTHERXX-36" TALLC(1) 4" SLEEVE WITH PULL ROPEA1ELECTRICAL HOUSE METER & MASTER HOUSE PANELREMOTE HOUSE PANEL FEEDERREFER TO SINGLE LINE DIGRAMS ON SHEET E0-30B4DISTRIBUTION TO BE PARALLEL WITHWALKWAYOR EQUAL14FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE II)USA# DSTPB1-II-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PM10FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV)USA# DSTPB1-IV-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PM3500° K. WITH SOLID TOP AND BOTTOM LENSBOTTOM EDGE OF FIXTURE12W. LED WALL LIGHT - (1200 LUMEN MIN.)TO BE AT OR ABOVE +7'-0"LOCATIONS. DOES NOT OCCUR AT EVERY UNIT.REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION.SAME AS WALL LIGHT ABOVE AT UNIQUEB210FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IIUSA# DSTPB1-II-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PMA414FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV)USA# DSTPB1-IV-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PMELECTRICAL KEY NOTES4 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITINDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL)2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT2 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITH..-X212H..-X210H..-X4101FUTURE EV CHARGER LOCATIONAIM AT POOL DECK IN FRONT OF SPA.2FRONTSIDELED BULLET LIGHT ON TRELLISHADCO# BL9-D-W-*WITH SMALL ROUND CANOPY MOUNT* FINISH TO MATCH TRELLIS COLORDFFFFLED BULLET LIGHT ON TREE RINGHADCO# BL9-D-W-*AURA# SQR-D-4X4-L30-SO-**-CE-STD**FINISH BY OWNERELED BULLET LIGHTHADCO# BL9-D-W-*ON PERMA POST4 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITH..-X412(1) 1.5" CONDUIT TO ELECTRICAL PANELWITH PULL ROPE.0.70.90.70.80.80.81.50.60.20.10.30.80.60.70.60.40.40.40.60.60.40.20.30.81.82.31.50.90.70.91.62.11.40.70.60.82.82.42.11.92.12.42.81.81.11.42.12.02.12.22.12.02.11.71.31.11.21.41.51.61.61.41.41.41.21.01.01.60.80.91.11.11.00.90.90.90.80.60.60.90.91.01.11.11.00.91.01.10.90.60.71.61.21.51.41.41.51.21.71.80.90.81.02.12.62.51.00.91.82.21.40.90.70.91.81.10.80.60.70.80.90.80.80.80.51.61.20.90.60.71.01.31.31.31.10.61.61.30.80.60.71.21.61.41.41.20.71.91.40.60.50.52.11.20.60.51.42.21.40.60.50.72.31.40.70.61.40.60.51.80.50.51.50.71.60.71.50.81.10.40.50.60.60.70.60.70.60.70.60.60.60.50.40.40.61.10.71.20.71.10.71.00.70.80.90.70.50.40.51.40.40.52.00.50.50.70.52.91.70.80.63.42.00.80.43.71.90.70.53.32.00.80.72.81.60.80.60.60.71.41.80.50.51.40.81.50.71.50.71.51.41.30.40.70.60.60.70.60.70.60.70.60.70.70.50.40.40.61.00.81.10.71.10.71.10.70.90.70.40.40.40.80.70.90.70.81.11.30.91.10.90.91.81.30.80.90.80.90.50.70.50.70.50.70.60.70.60.60.70.50.70.90.60.90.50.50.40.40.40.40.30.30.30.30.30.90.90.60.40.50.90.70.60.50.80.81.11.71.61.51.31.01.61.31.62.22.01.91.31.02.01.61.61.70.80.60.82.11.51.21.11.40.61.02.31.71.20.90.80.70.60.81.11.00.91.60.71.21.21.41.30.70.60.81.50.71.30.80.60.71.30.71.40.80.60.81.20.61.30.52.10.90.71.61.70.11.01.21.51.21.11.32.22.72.31.41.10.40.71.40.52.61.61.42.30.80.81.33.60.31.33.41.30.50.70.70.60.60.61.01.31.21.31.00.20.42.10.30.41.10.80.52.00.72.21.32.20.61.61.40.60.70.91.11.32.00.62.10.60.90.70.50.60.61.01.31.62.22.21.50.70.91.22.02.82.93.13.63.03.22.61.81.21.03.62.00.92.61.21.91.41.01.11.22.13.22.92.51.91.71.82.42.52.31.51.00.70.71.31.31.20.90.32.60.60.40.70.70.91.30.72.10.61.82.23.22.82.31.51.91.92.22.02.32.61.41.00.80.71.41.92.22.01.92.12.01.41.80.40.40.70.30.20.70.91.01.92.52.36.64.38.78.77.611.52.63.01.71.72.32.52.31.41.31.52.02.02.62.72.32.01.81.52.12.32.92.82.62.32.1A4FFF FHSSA3A4A3HSSA3HSSA3HSSA4A4A3A3HSS A4 HSS A4 HSS CCCCCC C C CC CCCCCCCC CCCC A4 HSSFFFFFFFFFFFFDDDDDDA3 HSS ANAHEIM, CA LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING27201 Calle JuanitaDana Point, CA 92624Ph. 949.201.1333candelaengineering.comCLIENT:STAMP:REVISIONS:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:A TOWN - PARCEL FPROJECT #: X1-070ATTACHED DWELLING UNITSLENNAR15135 Alton Parkway, Suite 365Irvine, California 92618Tel: 949.349.8000DATE: 07/06/2022SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"PHOTOMETRICSITE PLANEP-10MATCHLINE SEE SHEET EP-20PLANNING COMMISSION SET - DATE: 04-22-22 LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGENDELECTRICAL DEVICE LEGENDJUNCTION BOXWR RATED - GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLEW/ IN USE WEATHERPROOF COVERWPJELECTRICAL PANELSINGLE POLE SWITCHELECTRICAL KEY NOTESJUNDERGROUND PULL BOXTRANSFORMERTLANDSCAPING18" MINNONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT)LOW VOLTAGE (>30V)LANDSCAPE LIGHTINGDIRECT BURIAL CABLE6" MINSTREETS, HIGHWAYS,ROADS ALLEYS,DRIVEWAYS, ANDPARKING LOTS24" MINNONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT),RIGID METAL CONDUITAND DIRECT BURIAL CABLESRIGID METAL CONDUITOR INTERMEDIATEMETAL CONDUITMINIMUM COVER REQUIREMENTS2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITINDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL)3 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT2 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITIRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMPIRRIGATION CONTROLLERBP1.EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING CONDUCTORS TO BE # 12 THHN/THWN-2 CU IN 3/4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUITUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MINIMUM COVER PER NEC 300.5(A) (SEE THIS SHEET)2.UNDERGROUND PULL BOXES ARE TO BE SIZE 3-1/2. ADDITIONAL PULL BOXES MAY BE NEEDED THANCURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO HELP IN PULLING THE CONDUCTORS DURING INSTALLATION. THECOVER OF THE PULL BOXES ARE TO BE MARKED WITH "ELECTRIC".3.SPLICES AND TAPS SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES OR POLE BASE HAND HOLES ONLY.4.REFER TO THE DRY UTILITY CONSULTANT PLANS OR SERVING UTILITY PLANS TO CONFIRM THE SERVICELOCATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UNDERGROUND WORK.5.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 3/16" MIN. PULL ROPE IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS OR SLEEVES.6.UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS LOCAL CODES OR THE SOILS REPORTREQUIRE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONDUIT.7.THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST NEVER HAVE A GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE (WALL LIGHT, POLELIGHT, BOLLARD, ETC.) WIRED AFTER AN ACCENT LIGHT SUCH THAT IF THE ACCENT LIGHT WAS REMOVEDOR DAMAGED IT WOULD AFFECT THE GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE'S POWER.8.THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST FLIP THE CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OFF BEFORE ANY MAINTENANCE ORREPLACEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL FIXTURE, LAMP, DEVICE OR CONTROLLER.9.IF GATES FOR PEDESTRIANS AND/OR VEHICLES ARE TO BE INSTALLED; THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR ISTO COORDINATE WITH THE GATE CONTRACTOR(S) TO MAKE SURE ANY NECESSARY CONDUITS, CIRCUITSOR WIRING ARE TO BE INSTALLED OTHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ALSO, LOW VOLTAGECONDUIT MAY ALSO BE NEEDED FOR ACCESS CONTROL. COORDINATE ON LOCATION AND REQUIREMENTSFOR KNOX BOX, PROVIDE EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED.10. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALLDESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASEDUPON A 40-AMPERE MINIMUM BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED.11. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVEDEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITHCALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE.ELECTRICAL PANEL IDENTIFICATIONHP1H..-XCIRCUIT IDENTIFIERCIRCUIT NUMBERPANEL IDENTIFICATIONVD=X.X%VOLTAGE DROPH..-X212H..-X310H..-X210ELECTRICAL METER PEDESTALEXTERIOR SITE ELECTRICAL NOTESA215W. LED 36" TALL BOLLARDTYPE II DISTRIBUTION3500 DEGREE K LAMPKIM# CBXX-15L-35K-UV-FINISH OTHERXX-36" TALLC(1) 4" SLEEVE WITH PULL ROPEA1ELECTRICAL HOUSE METER & MASTER HOUSE PANELREMOTE HOUSE PANEL FEEDERREFER TO SINGLE LINE DIGRAMS ON SHEET E0-30B4DISTRIBUTION TO BE PARALLEL WITHWALKWAYOR EQUAL14FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE II)USA# DSTPB1-II-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PM10FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV)USA# DSTPB1-IV-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PM3500° K. WITH SOLID TOP AND BOTTOM LENSBOTTOM EDGE OF FIXTURE12W. LED WALL LIGHT - (1200 LUMEN MIN.)TO BE AT OR ABOVE +7'-0"LOCATIONS. DOES NOT OCCUR AT EVERY UNIT.REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION.SAME AS WALL LIGHT ABOVE AT UNIQUEB210FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IIUSA# DSTPB1-II-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PMA414FT POLE (4" DIA.)3000° K LAMP53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV)USA# DSTPB1-IV-48LED-WW-120-XBZ-PMELECTRICAL KEY NOTES4 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITINDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL)2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT2 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITH..-X212H..-X210H..-X4101FUTURE EV CHARGER LOCATIONAIM AT POOL DECK IN FRONT OF SPA.2FRONTSIDELED BULLET LIGHT ON TRELLISHADCO# BL9-D-W-*WITH SMALL ROUND CANOPY MOUNT* FINISH TO MATCH TRELLIS COLORDFFFFLED BULLET LIGHT ON TREE RINGHADCO# BL9-D-W-*AURA# SQR-D-4X4-L30-SO-**-CE-STD**FINISH BY OWNERELED BULLET LIGHTHADCO# BL9-D-W-*ON PERMA POST4 #12 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #12 CU-GNDIN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUITH..-X412(1) 1.5" CONDUIT TO ELECTRICAL PANELWITH PULL ROPE.0.61.31.10.71.60.91.81.02.00.91.70.71.71.60.81.51.51.51.11.01.30.81.30.71.30.31.21.31.61.51.31.30.90.50.50.40.40.30.20.20.40.50.40.60.40.60.50.60.50.60.50.40.70.51.62.02.22.22.11.81.00.50.50.50.40.40.30.40.40.50.40.40.40.40.40.50.40.40.40.40.40.51.81.51.21.01.11.00.91.01.00.90.90.80.90.80.80.80.90.80.91.61.21.71.72.02.01.81.92.01.81.81.61.71.91.81.51.81.81.51.82.01.71.70.81.11.62.12.02.02.01.91.92.22.31.30.60.90.90.60.80.90.60.81.10.60.91.10.60.80.80.60.71.00.61.11.40.71.21.00.60.80.80.60.81.20.71.21.50.71.30.90.60.80.70.60.71.30.71.31.50.71.30.80.60.70.80.60.81.20.61.31.40.61.30.20.30.40.40.30.30.50.90.82.32.01.92.01.30.70.71.90.52.30.61.00.60.70.60.60.41.32.02.32.31.90.72.70.30.32.50.90.31.00.42.30.72.31.61.42.32.02.12.02.32.41.80.90.70.70.70.80.91.82.42.32.02.12.12.32.41.70.90.81.51.71.31.61.31.51.91.11.31.51.71.31.61.31.51.91.11.3UNION STREET (PUBLIC)CCCCCCCCCCCA3HSSA3 HSS A3 HSS A3 HSS A3 HSS ANAHEIM, CA LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING27201 Calle JuanitaDana Point, CA 92624Ph. 949.201.1333candelaengineering.comCLIENT:STAMP:REVISIONS:SHEET TITLE:SHEET NUMBER:A TOWN - PARCEL FPROJECT #: X1-070ATTACHED DWELLING UNITSLENNAR15135 Alton Parkway, Suite 365Irvine, California 92618Tel: 949.349.8000DATE: 07/06/2022SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"PHOTOMETRICSITE PLANEP-20MATCHLINE SEE SHEET EP-10PLANNING COMMISSION SET - DATE: 04-22-22 May 31, 2022 Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner, Planning & Building Department CITY OF ANAHEIM 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Subject: Project Description for Final Site Plan Application A-Town Development Area F DEV2021-00131 Lot 5, Tract No. 17703 The Platinum Triangle Anaheim, CA Dear Lisandro: On behalf of the property owner, PT Metro, LLC, and the applicant, Lennar, Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc. is submitting a Final Site Plan application for the City of Anaheim’s review of a proposed residential development for Development Area F (Lot 5, Tract No. 17703) of the A-Town Master Site Plan, in The Platinum Triangle area of the City of Anaheim. The proposed development will consist of 73 dwelling units in 17 multi-family residential buildings, along with associated infrastructure and common area improvements including a recreation center and pocket park for the community’s residents. Existing Site Conditions The approximate 5.1-acre project site, known as Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan, is located at the southeast corner of Union Street and Park Street. The project site is part of A-Town’s Master Site Plan entitlements and is allocated for residential development within the range of 70 to 132 total dwelling units (16-30 dwelling units per acre). The existing land use consists of a vacant mass graded pad with some construction equipment being staged temporarily. The property’s surrounding land uses consist of the Aloe Greens Park and multi-family residential development within A-Town Development Area G (Alia) to the west beyond Union Street, future mixed use development within A-Town Development Areas C and D to the north beyond Park Street, future multi-family development within A-Town Development Area E to the east and the existing SoCal Gas office campus to the east and an existing industrial office building (George T. Hall Company) to the south. Proposed Project The proposed development will consist of 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units with associated infrastructure and common area improvements including a recreation center with a pool, spa and community room and pocket park for the residents’ use and leisure. Units will range in size from approximately 1,675 square feet to 2,399 square feet. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 2 Architecture The project’s architecture will consist of two three-story building types, Building Type 1 includes 4 units and Building Type 2 includes 5 units. Each building type will consist of a mix of 3 and 4 bedroom units. The 17 total residential buildings combine for 73 total dwelling units. The unit mix will consist of 39 – 3-bedroom townhomes and 34 - 4-bedroom townhomes. The project’s architectural style is compatible with the surrounding development and is designed to front on Park Street and Union Street to create an attractive and active streetscene with front-yard patios, entry stoops, balconies, building articulation, architectural details, and varied rooflines and building materials and colors. The spirit and intent of the project’s architecture is to meet and exceed the established design standards of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone and the A-Town Master Site Plan. The project’s architectural style is compatible with the surrounding environment and development, while distinguishing the site with its own unique features to create a sense of place in the A-Town district. The elevation design for the project is sensitive to the pedestrian scale to help create a unique integrated, walkable urban environment that encourages pedestrian activity. The building elevations attempt to be visually elegant and tectonically well composed with a sensibility for human scale, and curb appeal. Lastly, the building design works to create a balance of landscape and architecture by providing sufficient planting space for a very pleasant urban pedestrian experience along the street setback areas and internal common areas, courtyards and walkways. Site Design & Landscaping The project’s site design incorporates the following features to comply with the design standards of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), the PTMU Overlay Zone and the A-Town Master Site Plan and to provide a vibrant walkable community with high quality landscaping and architecture.  Pedestrian walkways will be provided throughout the project site to connect residents to perimeter connector streets (Union Street and Park Street) and to the Aloe Greens Park, as well as to the on-site recreation center, pocket park and other residential buildings.  Architectural features will include private patios with raised stoop entrances, and balconies fronting on perimeter connector streets (Union Street and Park Street) to activate the adjacent street parkways and park areas.  Common areas with water-wise landscaping and trees will provide shaded walkways and will create visual interest as well as complement the buildings’ architecture.  A recreation center with pool, spa, sun deck and community building for the residents, will provide a focal amenity to enjoy active recreation and a space to host parties as well as informal gatherings.  A pocket park will be located on the corner of Union Street and Park Street to create community focal point and amenity for the residents with passive recreation features. Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 3 Above Ground Utility Facility Locations As part of the project a Conditional Use Permit application is being requested to allow for above ground utility facilities (fire double detector check, domestic water service meter and backflow prevention device), to be located within the interior property line setback area along the southern property line near Union Street as a permitted encroachment. The proposed utility locations are due to site constraints associated with the development of 17 multi-family residential buildings with several required utility services and there is limited space to locate all of these utilities outside of the required setback areas. Summarized below is a detailed description of the project site constraints, which require the proposed use of the interior property line setback area for locating above ground water facilities, with proper landscape screening and treatment. Site Constraints 1. Several above ground utility facilities are required to serve the proposed residential units as required by City of Anaheim standards and policies.  Two electric vaults  Three electrical transformers to serve the proposed development  Two fire double detector checks  Three proposed fire hydrants  Two Domestic Water Service Meters and Backflow Prevention Devices 2. The project’s perimeter streets (Union Street and Park Street) have been designed to be activated with residential patios, which limits opportunities to locate and conceal above ground utilities in areas outside of the required setback areas. To mitigate the location of the proposed fire double detector check, domestic water service meter, and backflow prevention device in the southern interior property line setback area, the following landscaping and site planning features have been incorporated into the design to ensure an attractive streetscene is maintained. 1. Landscape screening techniques will be utilized, including the use of dense hedges behind the public sidewalk, to minimize the aesthetics of the fire double detector check, domestic water service meter, and backflow prevention device in the setback area. 2. The proposed fire double detector check, domestic water service meter, and backflow prevention device will be located along the entry drive off Union Street along the southern property line, not activated with pedestrian traffic from Union Street. Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 4 3. This area within the interior property line setback provides sufficient space for the proposed fire double detector check, domestic water service meter, and backflow prevention device with proper landscape treatment/screening and convenient access for emergency services. Consequently, the southern interior property setback provides the best opportunity to successfully screen the above ground utility facilities and allow the project to accommodate all required utility services and other essential project components for the successful operation of the proposed multifamily residential development. Please refer to the Preliminary Utility Plan (Sheet C-3), Conceptual Landscape Plan (L-1), Above Ground Utilities Screening Exhibit (L-7) and Final Site Plan exhibits for illustration of proposed above ground utility locations, landscape screening treatments and site design considerations previously described. Private Patio Encroachment As part of the project’s Conditional Use Permit application is a request to allow 18 private patios to encroach six (6) feet into the required 20-foot building to building setback area where only a five (5) foot encroachment is permitted. The proposed patio areas are located between buildings 2 and 3, 4 and 5, and 8 and 9 as shown on the Technical Site Plan (Sheet C-1). The proposed increased patio encroachments will help accommodate a larger private patio space for the residents to support overall livability and quality of life. It should be noted, that with the proposed 6-foot patio encroachments, the minimum forty percent (40%) landscape requirement will still be met in the building to building setback areas as shown on Sheets L-5 and L-6 of the Landscape Plan. To mitigate the proposed 6-foot patio encroachments, the following landscaping and site planning features have been incorporated into the design to ensure an attractive paseo area is maintained between the residential buildings. 1. To maximize landscape opportunities along the central walkways in the paseos, Plan 4 units will not have front patios to provide significant landscaping upon entering the paseos to soften the buildings and create a sense of place. 2. 40% landscape area in the paseos will be provided in between the buildings as required by code. 3. Patio walls, landscape hedges and dense planting will be provide along the central walkways in the paseos to transition and buffer the patio interface and help create privacy while being aesthetically pleasing. 4. Approximately 50 feet of the 100-foot building frontage in the paseos will provide patio space along the central walkways to minimize the potential for any corridor effect. Therefore, the combination of landscape treatments, patio walls and patio locations create a design for the paseo areas to help soften the buildings and provide an attractive walkway, while allowing for ample private outdoor space for the community’s residents. Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 5 Circulation Vehicular access to the site will be provided off Park Street with an entry, approximately 210 feet east of Union Street. There will also be an entry provided off Union Street with an entry approximately 420 feet south of Meridian Street. Both entries connect to the project’s main private access drive, which provides vehicular access to all of the residential buildings’ garages. Seven residential buildings, along the perimeter of the site, have direct garage access from the main private access drive. Ten residential buildings, located at the interior of the site, will have access from five smaller alley drives, which branch out from the main access drive. Solid waste collection trucks will be able to access the site from the emergency access road along the site’s easterly boundary with A-Town Development Area E and from the entry off of Union Street to service the site without any turnarounds. Pedestrian circulation is also a vital component of the project’s site design. Walkways are provided throughout the site connecting all residential buildings to the recreation center, pocket park, surface parking and the adjacent connector streets (Union Street and Park Street), as well as linking to the Aloe Greens Park. In addition to on-site circulation, the project has great access to the city’s arterial highway system, being located off of the adjacent arterial street, Gene Autry Way, with close proximity to State College Boulevard and Katella Avenue for easy connection to the 5, 57 and 22 freeways. Together with the site’s circulation, location and access to public transportation, the proposed development provides a convenient place to live with great access to job centers and entertainment hubs in both Orange and Los Angeles counties. Parking Parking for the proposed project will be provided to comply with code requirements for residential uses in the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone with two garage spaces per unit and additional surface parking (on-site) based on the units’ bedroom counts. The following summary tables list the project’s required and provided on-site parking. Required Parking Plan No. Number of Units Unit Type/ Bedroom Count Parking Required (Spaces/Unit) Total Required Parking 1A 17 3 Bedroom 2.5 42.5 2A 22 3 Bedroom 2.5 55 3A 17 4 Bedroom 3.5 59.5 4A 17 4 Bedroom 3.5 59.5 Total Required Parking 217 Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 6 Parking Provided Type of Parking Provided Number of Parking Spaces Garage Spaces (2 Spaces per Unit) 146 On-site Surface Parking Spaces 67 ADA Parking Spaces 4 Total Parking Spaces 217 In addition to the on-site surface parking, on-street open parking spaces (2-hour time limit) will be available for visitors and residents of A-Town on both Union Street and Park Street per the A-Town Parking Management Plan. Requested Entitlements The following entitlements are requested as part of the proposed project. 1. Final Site Plan demonstrating that the proposed design for the site layout, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, parking, landscaping, common areas, building elevations and floor plans, building materials, grading and utility connections for the proposed residential development is in compliance with the requirements of the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone. 2. Conditional Use Permit: To allow above ground utility facilities (fire department connection, domestic water service meter, and backflow prevention device) to be located within the southern interior property line setback due to site constraints, with proper landscape screening and treatment to ensure an attractive street scene. To allow 18 private patios to encroach six (6) feet into the required 20 foot setback between two buildings where only a five (5) foot encroachment is permitted (one (1) foot beyond what the code permits for patio encroachments) due to site constraints and unit livability. Additionally, the project will also meet the minimum forty percent (40%) landscaping of the required 20 foot setback area between buildings. Additionally, the project’s CEQA analysis is covered by Addendum No. 4 for Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project along with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321, approved with the A-Town Amended Master Site Plan per Resolution No. 2015-265 on October 6, 2015. Thank you for your consideration of the Final Site Plan application for the development of Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan. We look forward to working with the City of Anaheim on this exciting project. Mr. Lisandro Orozco Senior Planner CITY OF ANAHEIM May 31, 2022 Page 7 Should you have any questions regarding the submittal package or need additional information please do not hesitate to give me a call at (949) 283-2294 or email to tfrattone@hunsaker.com. Sincerely, HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. Ted D. Frattone Project Manager, Planning & Entitlements TF:tl Attachments: cc: Vivian Extale, Lennar Ryan Gatchalian, PT Metro, LLC Maria Korkosz, PT Metro, LLC Niki Wu, C2 Collaborative Mike Cantrell, WHA Ed Mandich, H&A W.O. 3916-66 (f\c\wo\3916\ 66 L05-tf.docx) FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339 AND ADDENDA On October 26, 2010, the City Council City Council certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" (FSEIR No. 339) in conjunction with its approval of amendments to the General Plan, Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overla y Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone to allow up to 18,909 residential units; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; and, 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Three addenda to EIR No. 339 have been subsequently approved in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 undercrossing improvements and revisions to the Platinum Gateway and Platinum Vista projects. These projects included changes to the maximum permitted development intensity, which now permits up to 19,027 residential uses; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; 4,735,111 square feet of commercial uses; and, 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339 has been prepared to determine whether the environmental impacts of the proposed A-Town Development Area B Project were fully-disclosed b y FSEIR No. 339 or if a subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary for this project. The analysis in FSEIR No. 339 included anticipated build-out of the previously-approved A-Town Metro Project. As more thoroughl y described in the Addendum, the proposed A-Town Project is considered to be a refinement of the development assumptions analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 and will not require any major revisions to the Final EIR. FSEIR No. 339 and its Addenda, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 321 for the proposed A- Town Project, are available on the City’s website at: http://www.anaheim.net/1075/Report- Number-339. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CITY OF ANAHEIM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2021-00131 ADDRESS: Area F: Lot 5, Tract No. 17703 APN: Area F: 232-121-34 LOCATION: Area F: Southeast corner of Union Street and Park Street ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. R Aesthetics £ Agricultural & Forest Resources R Air Quality £ Biological Resources R Cultural Resources £ Geology / Soils R Greenhouse Gas Emissions R Hazards & Hazardous Materials R Hydrology/Water Quality R Land Use / Planning £ Mineral Resources R Noise R Population / Housing R Public Services R Recreation R Transportation / Traffic R Utilities / Service Systems R Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: £ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. £ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions on the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. £ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. £ I find the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. R I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Andy T. Uk, Associate Planner Printed Name, Title _ Date (714) 765-4958 Phone Number 06/22/2022 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used, or individuals contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section. 3) Response column heading definitions: a) Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. c) Less Than Significant Impact applies where the Project creates no significant impacts, only “Less Than Significant impacts”. d) No Impact applies where a Project does not create an impact in that category. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one proposed (e.g., the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (§ 15063(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the Project. 5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., the General Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 6) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. A-Town Development -Area B and E Project Initial Study Page 1 Project Setting The Project Site includes the development of one area of the A-Town Master Site Plan: Development Area F (Lot 5, Tract No. 17703), approximately 4.3-acres. Development Area F is the “Project Site” in this document. Development Area F is located at the southeast corner of South Union Street and East Park Street. The Project Site is part of the A-Town Master Site plan approved by City Council in 2015 that permitted development of between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, and between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses. Development Area F is entitled for residential development within the range of 70 to 132 dwelling units (16-30 dwelling units per acre). The Project Site is currently undeveloped but has been “rough-graded” and the Property Owner/Developer has completed the majority of the infrastructure within the A-Town Master Site Plan. The following describes the surrounding uses of each development area: North: East Park Street and undeveloped A-Town Development Areas C and D; East: Undeveloped A-Town Development Area E and Southern California Gas Company office campus; South: Existing industrial building; and West: South Union Street, multiple family residential in A-Town Development Area G, and Aloe Greens Park. Project Background In May 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update that established a new vision for the Platinum Triangle as a dynamic mixed-use urban district. This update created new land use designations within the Platinum Triangle that provide opportunities for existing, largely industrial, uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. This General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which at that time permitted up to 9,175 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, and 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses. In August 2004, the City Council adopted the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) and the Platinum Triangle Master Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone to implement this new vision for the Platinum Triangle. Under these updated zoning regulations, an approved Final Site Plan and a Development Agreement between property owners and the City are required for all development utilizing the PTMU Overlay Zone. On October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 (FSEIR No. 332) in conjunction with its approval of amendments to the General Plan, PTMLUP and Zoning Code and related reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses. On October 25, 2005, immediately following the certification of FSEIR No. 332 and approval of the related actions, the City Council approved an application from Lennar Platinum Triangle, LLC to construct the A- Town Metro Project. The original project consisted of up to 2,681 residential units; 150,000 square feet of commercial uses; two public parks; and, a network of local streets. An addendum to FSEIR 332 was A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 2 prepared and approved as part of the A-Town Metro Project. On November 8, 2005, City Council approved a Development Agreement for the A-Town Metro Project. On December 13, 2005, the City recorded the A-Town Metro Project’s Development Agreement. On December 16, 2008, City Council approved an amendment to the Development Agreement to allow additional time to complete certain milestones. On February 23, 2009, the City recorded the amended Development Agreement. On October 26, 2010, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (FSEIR No. 339) in conjunction with its approval of amendments to the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; and, 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Subsequent amendments and addenda to FSEIR No. 339 have analyzed and revised the maximum development intensities to up to 17,501 residential units; 134,490,233 square feet of office uses; 4,782,243 square feet of commercial uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. On October 20, 2015, the City Council approved Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339 in conjunction with its approval of amendments to the General Plan, PTMLUP, and PTMU Overlay Zone, and an amended and restated development agreement, tentative tract map and final site plan for the revised A-Town Metro Project. This revised project permitted development of between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, and between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks, and a network of local streets within the A-Town Metro Project area (Refer to Figure I-1, A-Town Metro Project). The City Council also approved the Final Site Plan for the first phase of the A-Town Metro Project for a 400-unit apartment project with a 6-story parking structure in Development Area A. Figure I-1 A-Town Metro Project Source: Hunsaker & Associates, December 2013. REMNANT GENE AUTRY WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED( 2,487 SF/0.05 AC) CONNECTOR STREETSMARKET STREET A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 4 Project Description The applicant is proposing multiple family uses in Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan. The proposed development will consist of 17 multiple family residential buildings with a total of 73 residential dwelling units. The number of residential units is consistent with the development allocation for Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site plan of 70 to 132 residential dwelling units. The Project will have a residential density of 16.8 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the development allocation of 16 to 30 dwelling units per acre for Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan. Figure I-2, Proposed Site Plan-Development Area F, shows the proposed site plan. The Project will consist of three-story buildings in an attached townhome design. There will be two building types in the Project with the first consisting of four units and the second consisting of five units. Each building type will include three and four bedroom units. The overall Project unit mix will consist of 39 three-bedroom units and 34 four-bedroom units. Residential dwelling units will range in size from approximately 1,675 square feet to 2,399 square feet. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for above ground-mounted utility facilities to be located within the interior five-foot structural setback along the southerly property line. The applicant is also requesting a conditional use permit to allow ground-floor private residential patios to encroach one additional foot into the required setback between buildings to accommodate larger private patio areas for the residents. The Zoning Code allows for five-foot ground-floor private residential patios between buildings and the applicant is proposing six-foot ground-floor private residential patios. These 18 ground- floor private residential patios are located interior to the site along the primary pedestrian entry to the residential units. Common area improvements for residents will include a recreation center with a pool, spa, sun deck, and a community building. The Project will also include private recreation space within ground-floor patios and balconies. In addition, a pocket park will be located on the corner of South Union Street and East Park Street that will provide passive common recreation area with amenities for the residents. The applicant is proposing four different building elevations with two distinct architectural styles to distinguish the Project Site and provide its own unique features within the A-Town Project. The structures fronting South Union Street and East Park Street consist of landscaping, front-yard patios, raised entry stoops, and balconies to maintain active street frontages and provide for a walkable urban environment. The building design includes façade articulation, architectural details, varied rooflines, and different building materials and colors. The Project will provide 217 vehicular parking spaces within enclosed garage parking spaces and on-site surface parking spaces. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) requires a minimum of 217 parking spaces for the proposed 73 residential units. The Project will provide 146 parking spaces within private two-car garages, 67 on-site surface parking spaces, and four ADA parking spaces for a total of 217 parking spaces. Figure I-2 Conceptual Site Plan - Area F Source: WHA, July 2021. A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 6 Vehicular access to the Project Site will be provided with three driveways, two along East Park Street and a third along South Union Street. All three vehicular driveways connect to the Project Site's main private access drive, which provides vehicular access to all of the open and enclosed parking spaces. Seven residential buildings along the perimeter of the Project Site will have direct garage access from the main private access drive. Ten residential buildings, located at the interior of the Project Site, will have access from five smaller alley drives that have access from the primary drive. Solid waste collection trucks will access the Project Site using the main private access drive to service the Project Site. Previously Certified Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 This environmental document is a checklist to identify whether Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (SEIR No. 339), including its subsequent addenda (see description of addenda and Table 1 below), adequately analyzed the potential impacts of the Project pursuant to the requirements of CEQA and that no further environmental review is necessary. SEIR No. 339 was prepared to address the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP) and discretionary approvals associated with the Approved Project: General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471, amendments to the PTMLUP, amendments to the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, Zoning Reclassification No. 2008-00222, and the Platinum Triangle Water Supply Assessment. SEIR No. 339 addressed the potential impacts associated with aesthetics, air quality, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, utilities and service systems, and greenhouse gas emissions. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address significant and unavoidable impacts resulting from the implementation of the Approved Project. Nine Addenda have been previously adopted to address modifications to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Table 1, SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table, provides a brief summary for each project within the Platinum Triangle for which the City Council approved an addendum. The City Council approved amendments to the land use assumptions in Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, in conjunction with Addendum No. 2-6, through the approval of amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, the PTMLUP, and PTMU Overlay Zone. These documents, as amended, currently permit development of up to 17,501 residential units; 4,782,243 square feet of commercial uses; 13,659,103 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone. In addition, in 2020, the City Council approved a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) for the Stadium District Sub-Area A Project. This project creates the framework for the development of Sub-Area A of the Stadium District of the PTMU Overlay Zone pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the Applicant and a Master Site Plan; refer to Table 2, SCEA Summary Table. Table 1 SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table Addendum Title Project Summary Addendum 1: Katella Avenue/ Interstate 5 Undercrossing Improvements Project April 2012 Widen Katella Avenue at the undercrossing with the I‐5 between Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue and to create a fourth through lane of traffic in each direction of travel. Maintain dual left‐turn pockets at both intersections. The project area spans approximately 1,000 feet along Katella Avenue, with an area of disturbance encompassing approximately1.95 acres. A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 7 Table 1 SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table Addendum Title Project Summary Addendum 2: Platinum Gateway Project December 2012 Develop a 4‐story wrap‐style residential building with 399 dwelling units, a 5‐ story parking structure, and public park on 7.01 acres. Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP to increase the total number of dwelling units to 18,988 dwelling units; reduce the commercial square footage to 4,795,111 square feet; reduce the office square footage to 4,131,103 square feet; and no change to institutional uses: 1,500,000 square feet. Addendum 3: Platinum Vista Apartments Project October 2014 Develop a 5‐story wrap‐style residential apartment building with 389 units and a 6‐story parking structure (including one subterranean parking level). Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP to allow up to19,027 dwelling units; 4,735,111 square feet of commercial uses; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Addendum 4: Amended A‐Town Metro Master Site Plan August 2015 Construct eight neighborhood Development Areas ranging in size from 3.1 acres to 5.6 acres on the 43.2‐acre site. Develop between 1,400 and 1,746 residential dwelling units; up to 50,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses; and two public parks. Addendum 5: Jefferson Stadium Park Project June 2016 Develop a mixed‐use community with 1,079 residential apartments; 14,600 square feet of retail uses; and a 1.11‐acre public park. Building 1is a 5‐story wrap‐style building with 370 units; Building 2 is a 5‐storywrap‐style building with 376 units; Building 3 is a 4‐story podium building with 333 units and 14,600 square feet of retail space. Amend the Anaheim General Plan to relocate and combine two park sites into one park site. Amend the PTMLUP to allow for 18,909 dwelling units; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Addendum 6: LT Platinum Center Development Project September 2016 Mixed‐use development with 405 dwelling units; 433,000 gross square feet of commercial uses; a 200‐room hotel; 77,000 gross square feet of office uses. Amend the Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP to revise the district boundaries to change the LT Platinum Center site from the Gateway District to the Stadium District; reduce the maximum dwelling units to 17,348 units; increase the maximum commercial uses to 4,782,243 square feet; reduce the maximum office space to 9,180,747 square feet; and remove the designation of a public park from the site. Addendum 7: Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard Improvements Project March 2017 Widen Gene Autry Way from four lanes to six lanes with medians and storm drain and stormwater improvements; to widen the west side of State College Boulevard between Gateway Office and Artisan Court to accommodate a southbound right‐turn lane and a third through‐lane; and to make improvements to the east side of the intersection of State College Boulevard at Gene Autry Way, which is the west entrance to Angel Stadium of Anaheim (Angel Stadium). Additionally, a new intersection on Gene Autry at Union Street would be constructed to provide access to planned development areas. Addendum 8: Orangewood Avenue Improvements (From State College Boulevard to the Santa Ana River) and Eastside of State College Boulevard Improvements (From Orangewood Avenue to Artisan Court) Widen Orangewood Avenue from State College Boulevard to Dupont Drive and from Dupont Drive to the Santa Ana River from four lanes to six lanes with the addition of right-turn lanes. Widen State College Boulevard to four lanes between Orangewood Avenue and Artisan Court; north of Artisan Court, the outside lane would become a right-turn pocket into the Angel Stadium of Anaheim parking lots. Road widening to add a new northbound right-turn lane at the Orangewood Avenue Intersection with Rampart Street. Roadway A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 8 Table 1 SEIR No. 339 Addenda Summary Table Addendum Title Project Summary March 2018 improvements (sidewalk, relocated utilities, landscape planters, block walls, etc.) that were not considered in SEIR No. 339 are also analyzed. Addendum 9: Orangewood Avenue Improvements (From the Santa Ana River to East of SR-57) December 2021 & May 2022 Widen Orangewood Avenue from a five‐lane roadway to a six‐lane divided facility to provide expanded bicycle and pedestrian access from the Santa Ana River to just east of State Route 57 (SR-57) at the SR-57/Orangewood Avenue interchange. The Proposed Project would also include a water pipeline connection in Orangewood Avenue right-of-way, generally beginning at Rampart Street and ending to the east at Eckhoff Street. In addition, the Proposed Project includes a change to the jurisdictional boundaries between the City of Anaheim and the City of Orange, west of the western levee of the Santa Ana River, north and south or Orangewood Avenue. This proposed reorganization includes amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP, and other related documents to reflect the new City boundary and potential future use of the affected property. Addendum 10: 710 E. Katella General Plan, Zoning Map and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) Amendments (under preparation) Amend the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP to allow the development of up to 120 dwelling units at 710–818 East Katella Avenue and 1815 South Lewis Street. Development of the project site would be subject to the requirements of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, including but not limited to, subsequent City Council approval of a Development Agreement. Addendum 11: OC Vibe Project General Plan, Zoning Map and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) Amendments (under preparation) Amend the Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Zoning Map, and PTMLUP to allow the development of proposed new homes, shopping, dining, entertainment, parks and open spaces around Honda Center and ARTIC transit center. Table 2 SCEA Summary Table Addendum Title Project Summary SCEA: Stadium District Sub-Area A Project September 2020 The Stadium District Sub-Area A Project creates the framework for the development of Sub-Area A of the Stadium District of the PTMU Overlay Zone pursuant to a Disposition and Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the Applicant and a Master Site Plan to allow development of Sub- Area of the Stadium District with up to the development intensities described. Land Use Stadium District Sub-Area A Project Residential (dwelling units) 5,175 Commercial (square feet) 1,750,000 Office (square feet) 2,700,000 Stadium (seats) 45,500 Public Parks (acres) 10-13 Fire Station One station on 1.5 acres A-Town Development - Area F Project Initial Study Page 9 I. AESTHETICS – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? £ £ £ R £ b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, limitation trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? £ £ £ R £ c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? £ £ £ R £ d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. The Platinum Triangle area is highly urbanized with industrial, commercial, and recreational uses, which do not exhibit any significant geographic features or visual resources of importance. Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 339 determined that the overall boundaries of the Platinum Triangle do not contain any natural or undisturbed areas that provide undisturbed or unique vistas, and/or that are officially recognized by a local, State, or federal agency. SEIR No. 339 determined that no officially recognized local, State, or federal‐level scenic resources are located in the Platinum Triangle. The only Officially Designated State Scenic Highway located close to the Platinum Triangle is State Route 91 (SR‐91) from State Route 55 (SR‐55) to east of the City limits, SEIR No. 339 concluded that the Platinum Triangle would not be easily visible due to distance and sound walls. As there are no scenic resources located in the Platinum Triangle area, proposed development on Area F would not directly impact a scenic resource. In addition, Area F development, which would be two- to three-stories, would not obscure views of distant scenic resources due to intervening buildings and topography. Additionally, Area F development would not be visible from the Officially Designated Scenic Highway segment of SR‐91, which is located over three miles to the north, due to obstruction by nearby development and sound walls surrounding the highway. For these reasons, no impacts to scenic resources would occur and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts to the visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings associated with the proposed development in the Platinum Triangle, including the changes in residential and nonresidential land uses and modifications to the existing circulation system. Findings in SEIR No. 339 confirmed that compliance with provisions of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) would result in the creation of individual projects that are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 discussed impacts related to shade and shadows, including shade and shadows potentially generated by the medium‐ to high‐rise structures allowed in the Platinum Triangle with a typical building height of 100 feet, with some exceptions. The SEIR concluded that impacts to the visual character or quality of the Platinum Triangle would be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 1‐1, which require, prior to Final Site Plan approval, analysis of shade on properties sensitive to shadows for individual projects proposed within the Platinum Triangle. The proposed buildings for Area F would be approximately 38 feet in height and would be within the expected limits of the analysis provided in SEIR No. 339. Many iconic buildings and structures exist in the area surrounding the Project Area that provide landmarks to orient residents and visitors and provide the City with a visual image and aesthetic. Two examples provided in SEIR No. 339 include the large “A” outside Angel A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 10 Stadium of Anaheim and the Honda Center. Due to distance with intervening structures and topography, the proposed buildings for Area F would not create barriers to viewing or obscure visibility of prominent local landmarks from the Project Area. SEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts related to the creation of light and glare. The buildout of the area would introduce many new sources of nighttime illumination related to buildings, pedestrian walkways, parking areas, roadways, and parks. The proposed development for Area F is consistent with the development allocation of the A-Town Metro Master Site Plan density of 16 to 30 dwelling units per net acre. The developments include common area improvements such as landscape walkways, recreation courtyards, passive courtyards, pools, spas, sun decks and lounge areas. According to SEIR No.339, the light and glare impacts would be minimized through compliance with the PTMLUP. Furthermore, the majority of lighting associated with the proposed development on Area F would be directed internal to the Project Site itself, away from neighboring land uses. Therefore, interior and exterior lights on the Project Site would not shine directly onto light-sensitive uses and would not result in light trespass. No changes in circumstances involving the proposed development at Area F have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts associated with aesthetics would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES – In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation (DOC) as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? £ £ £ R £ b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act Contract? £ £ £ R £ c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12222(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? £ £ £ R £ d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? £ £ £ R £ e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? £ £ £ R £ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 11 Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that there are no areas designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance in the Platinum Triangle or surrounding vicinity, including Area F. SEIR No. 339 concluded that the buildout of the PTMLUP would have no impact on agricultural resources and no mitigation was necessary. The 2014 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program designates the Project Area F as Urban and Built‐Up Land. Additionally, there are no active farming activities within Project Area F. Therefore, the development of Area F, which has been substantially altered as a result of grading and past development, would not affect any Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance due to the extent of urbanization in the area. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339, and no mitigation is required. SEIR No. 339 determined that no areas zoned for agriculture exist in the Platinum Triangle or surrounding vicinity. Additionally, no lands covered by existing Williamson Act contracts are located within the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 concluded that the buildout of the PTMLUP would have no impact on these agricultural resources. There are no areas zoned for agriculture or covered under Williamson Act contracts within Project Area F. Therefore, the Project would not impact land zoned for agricultural use or covered by a Williamson Act contract and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 did not contain a section analyzing the loss, conversion, or rezoning of forestland. The Platinum Triangle is substantially developed and is not suitable for forestry and/or timber resources. There is no zoning for forest land in the City of Anaheim and no areas within the City classified as forest or timberland as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526. The City of Anaheim has no land zoned for forest or timberland, including Area F and the surrounding area. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any existing zoning for forest or timberland and would not cause rezoning of any forest or timberland. No impacts to forest or timberland would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 did not contain a section analyzing the loss or conversion of forestland. However, the Platinum Triangle does not support forestry and/or timber resources. The Project Site is in a highly urbanized area and not zoned for forest or timberlands. Therefore, the development of Area F would not conflict with existing forest or timberland and would not cause loss or conversion of any forest or timberland. No impacts to forest land would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No important farmland, agricultural activity, or forest/timberlands are present in the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 determined that no areas zoned for agriculture or utilized for agricultural activities exist in the Platinum Triangle or surrounding vicinity. Additionally, no existing Williamson Act contracts cover land within the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 concluded that the buildout of the PTMLUP would have no impact on these agricultural resources. No areas zoned for agriculture or utilized for agricultural activities exist in the Platinum Triangle or surrounding vicinity. Therefore, the Project would not impact agricultural practices or any agriculturally zoned lands within Project Area F and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the conversion of Area F, a vacant, undeveloped property to residential uses would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts associated with agricultural and forest resources would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 12 III. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? £ £ £ R £ b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? £ £ £ R £ c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? £ £ £ R £ d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. The Platinum Triangle is in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which encompasses all of Orange County (County) and portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The SCAB regional emissions inventory is compiled by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SEIR No. 339 states that the development of the PTMLUP would result in overall increased trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the Platinum Triangle area due to increased density of development. Although there would be an increase in trips and VMT locally, the development of the PTMLUP would provide a net benefit to the SCAG region because it creates mixed‐ use residential development closer to employment centers. This decreases average trip length because employment, services, and housing would all be in close proximity to each other. This also reduces the need for the residents to travel long distances for commercial and entertainment centers. The Adopted PTMLUP was determined to be consistent with SCAG’s strategies to reduce VMT in the region and was determined to be consistent with the 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which was applicable to the PTMLUP. Therefore, the impacts relative to project consistency with the AQMP are considered less than significant in SEIR No. 339. SCAQMD has thresholds which are used to evaluate a project’s emissions and determine if there would be a potential significant impact related to construction or operation of the project. SCAQMD suggests that lead agencies evaluate both regional and localized impacts for a project. The City uses the thresholds established by the SCAQMD in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993, as updated in 2015). SEIR No. 339 determined that implementation of the PTMLUP would potentially violate air quality standards or contribute to existing or future air quality violations. The construction and operational activities associated with the buildout of the PTMLUP, including 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units on Area F, would result in a substantial increase in short‐ and long‐term air pollutants. SEIR No. 339 included Mitigation Measures 2‐1, 2‐2, 2‐3, 2‐4, 2‐5, 2‐6, 2‐7, 2‐8, and 2‐9 to reduce the potential air quality impacts during construction and operation of future Platinum Triangle projects. The mitigation measures focus on improving the efficiency of vehicles and require the use of materials in responsible ways to limit the release of pollutants that may violate existing air quality standards for the Platinum Triangle area and the County during construction and operation. However, even with these mitigation measures, impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable, and the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the PTMLUP would potentially result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of the criteria pollutants for which the project region is in non‐attainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards (ozone [O3], particulate matter less than 10 microns in size [PM10], and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size [PM2.5]). SEIR No. 339 found that the construction and operational activities associated with the PTMLUP would create short‐ and long‐term pollutants exceeding the regional significance thresholds established by SCAQMD, including PM10, PM2.5, volatile organic compounds (VOC), A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 13 nitrogen oxides (NOX), and sulfur oxides (SOX) from construction, and carbon monoxide (CO), NOX, VOC, PM10, and PM2.5 from operations. As explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro, based on the proposed modified land use plan, would result in a decrease in the number of vehicles and vehicle miles traveled. Therefore, the amount of pollutants emitted into the air basin associated with long‐term, operations would be less than the emissions originally anticipated to occur, which would result in approximately 49 percent more (long‐term) pollutant emissions compared to the proposed Revised A‐Town Metro project because there would be substantially less traffic. Potential impacts would be less when compared to the prior analysis of cumulative air quality impacts; nonetheless, Project implementation would contribute to the significant cumulative air quality impacts. Therefore, the SEIR No. 339 required incorporation of Mitigation Measures 2‐1, 2‐2, 2‐3, 2‐4, 2‐5, 2‐6, 2‐7, 2‐8, and 2‐9 would be implemented to reduce significant impacts as stated above. Even with Mitigation Measures 2‐1, 2‐2, 2‐3, 2‐4, 2‐5, 2‐6, 2‐7, 2‐8, and 2‐9, however, the air quality impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable; therefore, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. SEIR No. 339 determined that the implementation of the PTMLUP had the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. During construction, projects within the Platinum Triangle would create temporary emissions of CO, NOX, VOC, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5. SCAQMD developed Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs) for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, PM10, and PM2.5 based on the ambient pollutant concentration of each pollutant and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. The sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the Area F are the occupants of multiple‐family residential dwelling units located west of Union Street. Pollutants resulting from project implementation would occur during the construction phase and following completion and occupancy/use of the Site. The emissions would comprise mostly of dust and particulate materials during the construction phase that would be dispersed in the area of operations. Such emissions would be controlled through the implementation of standard conditions and rules prescribed by the SCAQMD and SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 2‐1, 2‐2, 2‐3, 2‐4, 2‐ 5, 2‐6, 2‐7, 2‐8, and 2‐9. In addition, during the operation of the PTMLUP, sensitive land uses, including residential and recreational uses, would be located near major pollutant sources, including Interstate 5 (I‐5) and State Route 57 (SR‐57). However, the A‐Town Metro Master Land Use Plan project area is located beyond the 500‐foot freeway buffer area. Furthermore, there is a direct relationship between traffic/circulation congestion and CO impacts since exhaust fumes from vehicular traffic are the primary source of CO, which is a localized gas that dissipates very quickly under normal meteorological conditions. As explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro based on the proposed modified land use plan would result in a decrease in the number of vehicles generated at local intersections within the vicinity of Area F. Further, the proportion of project‐related vehicle trips is small in relation to the volume of traffic at local intersections. Therefore, CO concentrations at the critical intersections would not be exceeded based on buildout of the Platinum Triangle as previously approved and because vehicle trips would be reduced, the development of Area F would also not contribute to a CO concentration exceedance at the key study intersection and would not, therefore, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations at those intersections. SEIR No. 339 concluded that the odors generated during construction would dissipate before reaching sensitive receptors. An occasional “whiff” of diesel exhaust from passing equipment and trucks on public roadways may result; however, SEIR No. 339 concluded that these impacts would be less than significant. In addition, the industrial land uses within the Platinum Triangle would generally be non‐ odorous. Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 402, “Nuisance,” would safeguard the community from any odors from food preparation in restaurants and the residential uses. Land uses that result in or create objectionable odors typically include agriculture (e.g., livestock and farming), wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, etc. Some industrial uses are located west of the A‐Town Metro; including a gas station located northeast of Area F. However, as indicated in SEIR No. 339, odors generated by land uses within the Platinum Triangle must comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which prohibits the generation of odors that cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to a considerable number of persons or which endanger the comfort, repose, health, or safety of people. SEIR No. 339 found that odor impacts from placement of new residential land uses near existing odor generators would be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure 2‐10, which requires odor assessment for projects that would be located within 1,000 feet of an existing industrial facility. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new air quality impacts would occur as a result of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 14 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulation, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? £ £ £ R £ b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? £ £ £ R £ c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? £ £ £ R £ d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? £ £ £ R £ e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? £ £ £ R £ f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle is a built‐out environment with no natural resources and no native biological resources reside within the area, including on Area F. Although the Project Site is currently undeveloped, it was previously developed with commercial uses and paved parking lots that have been removed. At the present time, the Site area is devoid of any native plant or animal species. SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with candidate, sensitive, or special‐ status species would occur, and no mitigation was necessary. The Project Area is urban and developed and does not contain habitat for candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species. Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts related to biological resources identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle area does not contain riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts associated with riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities would occur and no mitigation was necessary. No new significant biological resources are identified in the Anaheim General Plan for the Site or for the immediate A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 15 Project Area, which is highly urbanized. Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle area does not contain wetlands. SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts associated with federally protect wetlands would occur and no mitigation was necessary. The Project Area is urban and developed and does not contain federally protected wetlands. Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation is necessary. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle area does not contain areas associated with wildlife corridors or nursery sites. Area F is in an area of the City that is extensively urbanized and devoid of natural habitat and/or native species. The Site has been significantly altered and previously supported commercial land uses and paved parking lots, which have since been removed in anticipation of buildout of the Platinum Triangle and, specifically, the development of the A‐Town Metro land use plan. SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with migratory wildlife corridors and native wildlife nursery sites would occur, and no mitigation was necessary. The Project would not expand the area of the Platinum Triangle or be located outside the original Project Area. In addition, the Project Area does not provide suitable native wildlife nursery habitat. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP was not subject to a tree preservation ordinance or other local regulation protecting biological resources. As indicated above, no new significant or important biological resources, including native trees, exist on Area F. While the existing remnant landscaping would be eliminated as a result of project implementation (i.e., construction of the up to 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units), the landscape concept plans prepared for the Project would offset the loss of any existing non‐native landscape species. Similarly, the Project would be designed to accommodate landscaping that complements the proposed residential development, as well as the existing character of the surrounding neighborhood. SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would occur, and no mitigation was necessary. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle is not within a plan area of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP); Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP); or other adopted local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with an HCP; NCCP; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan would occur, and no mitigation was necessary. The Project Area is not within a plan area of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other adopted local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. No impacts to an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other adopted local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan would occur, and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on biological resources would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to in §15064.5? £ £ £ R £ b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? £ £ £ R £ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 16 c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle does not contain any historical resources as defined by State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The Platinum Triangle is not located within the Anaheim Colony Historic District and none of the structures within the Platinum Triangle were identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan. Area F is currently undeveloped and does not support any existing structures; there are no above‐ground historic resources located within the Project Site, although two historic resources were identified within a one‐half mile radius of the A‐Town Metro area. Neither the Project Site nor the surrounding properties are identified as historic resources in the City’s General Plan. Furthermore, no known historic archaeological sites within the Platinum Triangle were identified. SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts would occur, and no mitigation was necessary. Although Area F has been previously developed with commercial uses and paved parking lots, it is possible that previously unidentified archaeological artifacts could be present within the area, each future project considered for approval within the Platinum Triangle area, by the City would be required to protect these resources as required under the mitigation measures. The discovery of buried resources within the Project Site would not contribute cumulatively to potential archaeological resources impacts in the region. Consequently, impacts to tribal cultural resources would not be cumulatively considerable. SEIR No. 339 determined that no defined historical resources or structures exist in the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F. The Project would not impact new locations with potential historical resources or structures beyond those analyzed in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no impacts to historical resources would occur and no mitigation is required. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle does not contain any known archaeological resources, including Area F. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area of the City of Anaheim and have been previously graded and developed/improved. Any near‐ surface archaeological resources that may have existed at one time have likely been disturbed and/or destroyed by prior development activities. SEIR No. 339 did not identify any impacts to prehistoric or historic archaeological resources, and no mitigation was required. The Project would not impact new locations with the potential to contain archaeological resources beyond those analyzed for the PTMLUP. The Project Area has already been disturbed, and the potential for any subsurface cultural resources to be discovered during construction is remote. Nonetheless, consistent with existing regulatory requirements outlined in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 14, Part 15064.5(f), and Public Resources Code Section 20182, in the unlikely event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find would immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether or not additional study is warranted. Depending on the significance of the find, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. Compliance with existing regulatory requirements would ensure that impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on historical resources or structures would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. VI. ENERGY – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary £ £ R £ £ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 17 consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? £ £ R £ £ Narrative Summary: Less-than-significant Impact. SEIR No. 339 did not analyze Energy as the City Council certified the document before the 2019 updated CEQA checklist became the new standard. Regulatory Framework California State Building Regulation California Building Code: Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Energy conservation standards for new residential and non- residential buildings were adopted by the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (now the CEC) in June 1977 and most recently revised in 2019 (Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Title 24 requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. The CEC adopted the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which went into effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 Standards continues to improve upon the previous 2016 Standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and nonresidential buildings. The 2019 standards work to achieve zero net energy for newly constructed residential buildings throughout California. The 2019 standards move towards cutting energy use in new homes by more than 50 percent and require installation of solar photovoltaic systems for single-family homes and multi-family buildings of three stories and less. Four key areas the 2019 standards focus on include 1) smart residential photovoltaic systems; 2) updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to exterior and vice versa); 3) residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements; 4) and nonresidential lighting requirements. Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings will be 30 percent more energy efficient compared to the 2016 standards while single-family homes will be seven percent more energy efficient. When accounting for the electricity generated by the solar photovoltaic system, single-family homes would use 53 percent less energy compared to homes built to the 2016 standards. California Building Code: CALGreen. On July 17, 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (24 CCR, Part 11, known as “CALGreen”) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code. CALGreen established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. The mandatory provisions of CALGreen became effective January 1, 2011, and were last updated in 2019. The 2019 CALGreen became effective on January 1, 2020. Senate Bill 350. Senate Bill 350 (de Leon) was signed into law in September 2015. SB 350 establishes tiered increases to the RPS of 40 percent by 2024, 45 percent by 2027, and 50 percent by 2030. SB 350 also set a new goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas through energy efficiency and conservation measures. SB 100. On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed SB 100, which replaces the SB 350 requirement of 45 percent renewable energy by 2027 with the requirement of 50 percent by 2026 and raises California’s RPS requirements for 2050 from 50 percent to 60 percent. SB 100 also establishes RPS requirements for publicly owned utilities that consist of 44 percent renewable energy by 2024, 52 percent by 2027, and 60 percent by 2030. Furthermore, the bill also establishes an overall state policy that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of all retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045. Under the bill, the state cannot increase carbon emissions elsewhere in the western grid or allow resource shuffling to achieve the 100 percent carbon-free electricity target. Local Regulation The City’s Green Element outlines goals and policies conserve energy during the construction and operation of buildings. Key goals and policies from the Green Element regarding new construction are: • Goal 15.2: Continue to encourage site design practices that reduce and conserve energy. Policy 15.2(1): Encourage increased use of passive and active solar design in existing and new development (e.g., orienting buildings to maximize exposure to cooling effects of prevailing winds and locating landscaping and landscape structures to shade buildings). A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 18 Policy 15.2(2): Encourage energy-efficient retrofitting of existing buildings throughout the City. • Goal 17.1: Encourage building and site design standards that reduce energy costs. Policy 17.1(1): Encourage designs that incorporate solar and wind exposure features such as daylighting design, natural ventilation, space planning and thermal massing. During construction, the Project would utilize main forms of available energy supply: electricity, natural gas, and oil. Construction of the Project in Area F would result in energy consumed in the form of electricity associated with the conveyance of water used for dust control, powering lights, electronic equipment, or other construction activities that require electrical power. Construction activities typically do not involve the consumption of natural gas. However, construction activities would also consume energy in the form of petroleum-based fuels associated with the use of off- road construction vehicles and equipment, round-trip construction worker travel to the Project Site, and delivery and haul truck trips. Construction activities would comply with CARB’s “In-Use Off- Road Diesel Fueled Fleets Regulation”, which limits engine idling times to reduce harmful emissions and reduce wasteful consumption of petroleum-based fuel. Compliance with local, state, and federal regulations would reduce short-term energy demand during the Project’s construction to the extent feasible, and Project construction would not result in a wasteful or inefficient use of energy. Therefore, during construction no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. The Area F Project is a residential project. The Site intensity and uses have been considered in SEIR No. 339 and would be implemented pursuant the A-Town Metro Master Site Plan. The Project would comply with State and Local regulations, in compliance with building codes, as they pertain to energy efficiency, therefore during operation, a less-than-significant impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the Project? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving? i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? £ £ £ R £ ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? £ £ £ R £ iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? £ £ £ R £ iv. Landslides? £ £ £ R £ b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? £ £ £ R £ c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction £ £ £ R £ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 19 or collapse caused in whole or in part by the project’s exacerbation of the existing environmental conditions? d. Be located on expansive soil, as identified in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? £ £ £ R £ e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? £ £ £ R £ f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? £ £ £ R £ This section utilizes the following technical study in its analysis: • Geotechnical Recommendations Parcel “F” A-Town Metro Project, 1404 E. Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, Group Delta Consultants, Inc., August 27, 2021 (Appendix A) Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 found that the Alquist‐Priolo Fault Zoning Map does not delineate any known earthquake faults within the A‐Town Metro property, which includes Area F. SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts associated with earthquake fault rupture would occur and no mitigation was necessary. The Project Area is not within an Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. In addition, any known active faults do not underlie the Project Area. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project proposed in Area F would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that development pursuant to the PTMLUP might expose occupants to impacts from earthquakes, including strong seismic ground shaking. The closest faults are the Puente Hills and San Joaquin Hills Thrust Faults located at distances of about 9.1 and 9.3 miles from the A‐Town Metro property, respectively. Newport‐Inglewood and Whittier Fault Zones are located at distances of about 10.7 and 9.6 miles from the Project Site, respectively. Due to the large distances of active faults from the Site, ground surface rupture is not a significant hazard. SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking were less than significant with compliance with building standards during final engineering of proposed projects within the Platinum Triangle. As with all Southern California, the Area F has the potential for strong seismic shaking. Design of the Project would adhere to any applicable regulations contained in the California Building Code, the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the Uniform Building Code. Therefore, seismic‐related impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. The Project proposed for Area F would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts associated with seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction, would be less than significant. There is no groundwater that goes to a depth greater than 11.5 feet below the surface within the Platinum Triangle area and the probability for liquefaction impacts is low. Because impacts related to seismic‐related ground failure were less than significant, no mitigation was required. The A‐Town Metro property, including Area F, is not within an area with liquefaction potential in the Safety Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan (Figure S‐3, Seismic and Geologic Hazards). In addition, groundwater was not encountered in subsurface, from the investigation completed by Group Delta Consultants, to the maximum depth explored of 20½ feet below ground surface (bgs). According to groundwater information obtained through the California Geological Survey (CGS) and presented in the Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim Quadrangle (CGS, 1997), the historically shallowest groundwater depth in the vicinity of the Project Site is greater than 50 feet bgs. Based on prior explorations performed at the overall A-Town site in 2005, groundwater was encountered at the Project Site at a depth of approximately 82½ feet bgs. Additionally, groundwater was encountered in 2006 at a depth of 76 feet. Therefore, there is a low probability for liquefaction impacts to occur and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that the Platinum Triangle, which includes the A‐Town Metro property, does not contain any major slopes on or in the immediate vicinity and concluded that no impacts associated with landslides would occur and no mitigation was necessary. There are no major hillsides or slopes within the Project Area. Area F is not within an area with earthquake‐ induced landslide potential in the A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 20 Safety Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan (Figure S‐3, Seismic and Geologic Hazards). Therefore, no impacts related to landslides would occur and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 concluded that soils in the Platinum Triangle have a slight erosion potential. Adherence to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction General Permit including the preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for erosion control, grading, and soil remediation during the grading and construction phase and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that also identifies measures to minimize the long‐term potential for erosion and loss of soil would reduce erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Because impacts related to erosion were less than significant, no mitigation was required. Construction of the Project would adhere to the requirements of the Construction General Permit. The SWPPP that would be prepared for the Project would identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control erosion and pollutant transport during the construction phase. Similarly, BMPs prescribed in the WQMP would also minimize potential erosion and pollutant transport following development of Area F, as proposed. Compliance with the Construction General Permit and implementation of construction BMPs would ensure that impacts related to erosion and loss of topsoil would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that the geologic composition of the Platinum Triangle is relatively stable because the soil units underlying the Platinum Triangle are generally medium‐dense, fine, and fine‐to‐medium sand with occasional traces of gravel and infrequent seams of silt. By following the Anaheim Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code, and the recommendations contained in these site‐specific geotechnical studies, the soils would be stable for building and risks of incident would be low. For this reason, the impacts associated with a geologic unit or unstable soil in SEIR No. 339 were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was required. Certified engineered fill of variable thickness overlying Quaternary-age young alluvial fan deposits currently underlie Area F. The most recent limited field investigation encountered clayey sand and silty sand at the upper 5 feet, and silty sand and poorly graded sand below 5 feet to a maximum explored depth of 20.5 feet bgs. The materials were generally medium dense to very dense in consistency, with the exception of one boring, where loose sands were encountered at a depth of 5 feet bgs. This boring was located in an area of the Project Site, northeastern corner, where mass grading was not previously performed. Only the northwestern portion of Area F was included during mass grading of the Platinum Triangle area. This indicates that loose sandy materials are present up to a depth of approximately 6 feet, in portions of Area F where mass grading did not occur. Also, a basin has been excavated near the northwestern corner of Area F, which likely has disturbed soils in part of the previously graded areas. Therefore, remedial grading including removal and recompaction of the upper 6 feet of the subsurface soils would be required in areas where mass grading has not previously been performed, or where subsequent excavations may have disturbed the near‐surface soils. The soils for Area F are generally of low compressibility. Therefore, due to the nature of the soils and historic groundwater table that is 50 feet or great below ground surface, liquefaction potential is considered to be low for Area F. Furthermore, the Site is devoid of steep slopes that would be subject to failure. Project design and construction would comply with the requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the Uniform Building Code, and the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report. Compliance with these requirements would ensure the soils would be stable for building and risks of incident would be low. For this reason, the impacts associated with soil instability would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. As identified in SEIR No. 339, the near‐surface soils within the Platinum Triangle area, which includes Area F, are generally medium‐ dense, fine, and fine‐to‐medium sand with occasional traces of gravel and infrequent seams of silt. The expansion potential for these soils is considered low. However, for Area F, although variance in expansion potential of on-site fill (certified and undocumented) soil does exist at the Project Site, expansive soils are not anticipated to impact the proposed construction. Additional testing should be performed upon completion of Site grading and excavation to confirm the expansion potential. Additionally, any design or construction for projects in the Platinum Triangle would adhere to the California Building Code and the Anaheim Municipal Code, thereby decreasing the risk associated with development on expansive soils. SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant. Zones of medium dense clean sands are presented above the water table and as such seismic compaction may result in settlement of about 0.5 inch at the Site. Area F has no known history of subsidence and is generally level. Design of the Project would adhere to any applicable regulations contained in the California Building Code, the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the Uniform Building Code, as well as the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Report. Compliance with these requirements would ensure the soils would be stable for building and risks of incident would be low. For this reason, the impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts over those identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 concluded that projects within the Platinum Triangle would not utilize septic tanks or alternative sewer systems. There would be no impact for soils supporting septic tanks or alternative waste disposal systems and no mitigation was required. Area F and A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 21 environs are currently served by a sanitary sewer system, which would continue to serve the Project. The Project would not add septic tanks or other alternative waste disposal systems to the Project Area. Therefore, no impacts related to alternative wastewater disposal systems would occur and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts relative to geology and soils would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? £ £ £ R £ b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would create a substantial increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from existing conditions. The SEIR identified mitigation measures for solid waste: 2‐3, 10‐18, 10‐19, 10‐20; transportation and motor vehicles: 2‐5, 9‐1, 9‐2, 9‐12, 9‐14; energy efficiency: 2‐6, 10‐21, 10‐22, 10‐24; and water conservation and efficiency: 10‐7, 10‐9, 10‐12, 10‐13, 10‐ 14. These mitigation measures would reduce GHGs to the greatest extent feasible; however, the PTMLUP would still generate a substantial increase in GHG emissions when compared to existing conditions. Therefore, the GHG emission generated by the PTMLUP were determined to be significant and unavoidable, requiring the City Council to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address significant and unavoidable impacts resulting from the implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Area F Project would consist of 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units. The A-Town Metro Master Site Plan for Development Area F allows for a range of 70 to 132 dwelling units. Along with the multi-family residential buildings and associated infrastructure, common area improvements would include a recreation center with a pool, spa and community room and pocket park for the residents' use and leisure. Addendum No. 4, which includes revisions to Area F, involves an overall decrease in the number of residential units and no retail/commercial floor area when compared to the approved Master Plan for the subject property. Specifically, implementation of the Addendum No. 4 would result in the development of a maximum of 132 condominiums and apartment units, which equates to a reduction of 146 dwelling units based on the maximum of 278 dwelling units approved for the same A‐Town Metro area when the PTMLUP was adopted. In addition, the Addendum No. 4 would not allow retail/commercial floor area, which is a change from the 19,000 square feet currently permitted, under the approved Master Plan. The revised A-Town Metro Master Plan, as described in Addendum No. 4, would generate a total of 13,746 trips per day compared to the 26,855 trips per day generated by the approved A-Town Metro Master Site Plan in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, GHG emissions from vehicle trips would be reduced by approximately 49 percent. In addition, the revised A-Town Metro Master Site Plan, which includes Area F, would generate less demand for utilities, including natural gas, electricity, and water. This decrease in both vehicular trips and demand for utilities would result in a reduction in GHG emissions. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 22 SEIR No. 339 determined that full implementation of the California Air Resources Board’s (ARB) Scoping Plan measures would reduce emissions produced by the PTMLUP by 35 percent. Implementing these measures along with the statewide GHG reduction measures for electricity producers, vehicles, fuel, and the cap‐and‐trade program would reduce the project emissions consistent with the GHG 30 percent reduction goals identified in Assembly Bill (AB) 32, as described in the statewide GHG emissions reduction strategy outlined in the Scoping Plan. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would not conflict with applicable regulations and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Implementation of the Project would result in a substantial reduction of GHG emissions as a result of the reduction in overall residential dwelling units and commercial development, compared to the approved A‐Town Metro Master Land Use Plan, which would further reduce the total Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan emissions presented in SEIR No. 339. Furthermore, the Project would follow the same regulations and plan measures for GHG reduction of at least 30 percent. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with applicable regulations and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts from GHG generation would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? £ £ £ R £ b. Create significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? £ £ £ R £ c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? £ £ £ R £ d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would exacerbate the current environmental conditions so as to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? £ £ £ R £ e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or £ £ £ R £ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 23 excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? £ £ £ R £ g. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 identified that many businesses that operate within the Platinum Triangle use various hazardous materials. The PTMLUP would continue to allow the use of hazardous materials in the operation of these businesses, as the Anaheim General Plan designates the northern part of the Platinum Triangle for industrial land use. All businesses in the area must seek permits for hazardous materials and maintain records of hazardous material storage, use, and disposal. Implementation of the PTMLUP would not result in a change in the frequency of use of hazardous materials in the Platinum Triangle and would result in less than significant impacts. No mitigation was required. Area F Project, a residential development, would not contribute to additional hazardous material usage during construction and operation. During construction, hazardous and potentially hazardous materials typically associated with construction activities would be routinely transported and used in the Project Area. These hazardous materials could include gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricants, and other products used to operate and maintain construction equipment. The transport, use, and handling of these materials would be a temporary activity coinciding with project construction. Equipment maintenance and disposal of vehicular fluids is subject to existing regulations, including the NPDES. In addition, trash enclosures are required to be maintained with covered bins and other measures to prevent spillage and/or seepage of materials into the ground. Given the nature of the Project in terms of scope and size, it is anticipated that normal storage, use and transport of hazardous materials would not result in undue risk to construction workers on the Site or to persons on surrounding areas. The use and disposal of any hazardous materials on the Site and in conjunction with the Project would be in accordance with existing regulations. With the exception of small quantities of pesticides, fertilizers, cleaning solvents, paints, etc., that are typically used to maintain residential properties, on‐going operation of Area F for the planned land uses within the Project Site would not result in the storage and/or use of hazardous materials that would rise to the level of creating a potentially significant adverse impact. SEIR No. 339 identified that development within the Platinum Triangle would not create a significant hazard to the environment through the release of hazardous materials into the environment. In addition, existing federal and State regulations that govern hazardous material and waste management help to minimize the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The impact was determined to be less than significant SEIR No. 339 relied on the database record searches for the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) No. 321 in 1999 and FSEIR No. 332 in 2005 to identify properties that had potential to pose environmental hazards inside the Platinum Triangle and nearby areas. Most of these properties were classified as “closed” action status and required no further remediation, and some were undergoing remediation at the time of analysis. Furthermore, any identified hazardous materials would be handled in a manner consistent with California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. FSEIR No. 332 included mitigation measure 5.4-6 requiring development projects to provide a Phase 1 Site Assessment, Phase II if required, and comply with any applicable oversight agency requirements prior to the issuance of grading permits. Addresses associated with the Project Site were identified in the database records utilized by FSEIR No. 322. The Project Site formerly contained an underground storage tank (UST). In February 1997, the UST, located at 1880 South Chris Lane, was removed under the oversight of the Anaheim Fire Department (AFD). No evidence of contamination was noted at the time of removal. In addition, the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works verified that no soil contamination was discovered after removal and that there were no regulatory records regarding contamination at the Site. A Phase I was prepared in January 2005 and recommended a soil assessment to determine if soil contamination exists in the vicinity of the former UST. A Phase II was prepared in May 2005 and included analytical results for four direct push probes advanced in the vicinity of the former UST. The samples were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) carbon chain distinction by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) method 8015M, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by USEPA method 8310 and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by USEPA method 8260. The Phase II testing concluded that TPH, PAH and VOC-affected soil A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 24 was present in the vicinity of the former UST. The report recommended that soil remediation take place in the vicinity of the former UST. Remedial soil excavation was conducted in March 2006 per the report’s recommendation. Subsequently, soil samples were collected at the base of the excavated area and no concentrations of TPH, and VOCs were detected. Concentrations of metals were detected; however, all were below residential preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) for contamination as set forth by the USEPA. In 2005, soil samples were collected and analyzed for VOCs around the former tetrachloroethene (PCE) drum storage area located at 1900 South Chris Lane. Trace levels of PCE were identified, but were below the USEPA PRG for residential soil in effect at the time of the investigation. As such, a closure letter/report for the Project Site was prepared recommending “no further action be required for the areas excavated.”1 In 2006, following an investigation at 1880 South Chris Lane, in the area of the former fuel dispenser, impacted soil was excavated and confirmation samples collected from the bottoms of the excavations. Analytical results were reported below USEPA Region 9 residential PRGs and established cleanup goals for TPH in effect at the time of the investigation. Soil samples collected in the area of the former spray booth at 1880 South Chris Lane were found to contain VOCs below laboratory detection limits and were not investigated further. In 2006, the sump at 1870 South Chris Lane and the sumps at 1800/1810 Talbot Way were removed, triple rinsed, and disposed of, along with adjacent soil (some of the soil was also used as backfill). With the exception of arsenic (which was attributed to background conditions), analytical results for the confirmation samples collected from the bottoms of each of the excavations were below USEPA Region 9 residential PRGs and established cleanup goals for TPH in effect at the time of the investigation. In 2007, a Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) was conducted at the Site. It was concluded that “results of the HHRA indicate that vapor diffusion to indoor air does not represent a significant threat to human health - meaning there is less than one in one million incremental increases in the risk of contracting cancer, and that no adverse, non-carcinogenic health risks are expected from occupational or residential use at the Site.” On August 17, 2007, the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department issued a no further action letter to the Site owner confirming the completion of Site investigation and remedial action at the Site. In May 2019, as part of due diligence activities conducted by a potential purchaser of the Site, soil and soil vapor samples were collected by GSI Environmental Inc. (GSI). Soil samples were collected and analyzed, and the only VOCs detected in soil vapor were PCE and trichloroethylene (TCE). In July 2019, Ramboll (on behalf of P. T. Metro LLC) conducted an additional soil and soil vapor investigation to further evaluate the vertical and lateral distribution of VOCs reported at the Site and to evaluate the potential for offsite vapor encroachment. Although concentrations of PCE, toluene, and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethene were reported in soil, concentrations did not exceed their respective residential screening levels. PCE was the primary VOC detected in soil vapor and exceeded its residential primary screening level (PSL). In November 2019, initial monitoring wells were installed on site with active monitoring and screening of both groundwater and soil. Although concentrations of PCE were reported in the soil, concentrations did not exceed their respective residential screening levels. VOCs, including PCE, were not reported in groundwater. In January 2020, P.T. Metro LLC entered into a standard voluntary cleanup agreement (VCA) with the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), identified as Docket No. HAS-FY 19/20-088, for the Site. The VCA establishes the regulatory oversite pursuant to FSEIR No. 332. Through the VCA process, the DTSC will review and approve a Remedial Action Work Plan (RAW) for the Project Site which will establish applicable investigation and remediation/removal details in addition to any methods that will be employed during cleanup and/or construction to protect the health and safety of workers and the public. If required, the RAW will describe any proposed long-term operation and maintenance requirements.2 Under the VCA with DTSC, Area F Project, would not create a significant hazard to the environment through the release of hazardous materials and impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that state and federal rules regulating the use and handling of hazardous materials would ensure that users comply with permitting programs and restrict the use of unauthorized hazardous materials. The PTMLUP would not result in adverse effects to the school population because new hazardous materials would not be introduced into the environment. SEIR No. 339 determined that hazardous waste impacts to schools were less than significant, and no mitigation was required. Specific to Area F, although the Paul Revere Elementary School at 140 W. Guinida Lane (northwest of the Project Site) is within the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan area, this school is not located within one‐quarter mile of the Project Area. Additionally, the Anaheim City Unified School District operates the Family Oasis at 131 W. Midway Drive and the Facilities and Operations Center at 1411 South Anaheim 1 Human Health Risk Assessment and Closure Report, TRC, May 9, 2007 2 https://dtsc.ca.gov/removal-action-work-plan-raw-quick-reference-guide/ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 25 Boulevard. These facilities, which are operated by the school district, are also beyond one‐quarter mile of the Project Site. Nonetheless, as indicated previously, use or handling of hazardous materials or substances within the Project Area would comply with appropriate state and federal rules and regulations through the requisite permitting process. No unauthorized use of hazardous materials would be allowed. Furthermore, with the reduction in the amount of future development as outlined in Addendum No. 4 for the A‐Town Metro component of the Platinum Triangle, construction‐related pollutant emissions, including particulates and related contaminants, would also be reduced. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 identified that the Platinum Triangle is not within the adopted Airport Land Use Plan for the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport. Therefore, no impacts related to airport land use plans would occur and no mitigation was required. There are two public airports in Orange County: John Wayne Airport (JWA), located approximately 11.5 miles south of the site and Fullerton Municipal Airport (FMA), which is located 7.5 miles to the northwest. Based on the location of the airports, the subject property is not located within a two‐mile radius of either airport and, therefore, is neither subject to nor affected by an adopted airport land use plan. Therefore, no safety hazard impacts related to an airport would occur and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 identified two heliports located at the University of California, Irvine Medical Center and the North Net Training Center. In addition, the Anaheim Police Department (APD) conducts helicopter training exercises in the parking lot of Angel Stadium of Anaheim. The flight paths for all these sites are located away from the Platinum Triangle, including Area F; therefore, SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would present a less than significant impact to the heliports and no mitigation was required. The Project would not include any tall structures that could interfere with flight paths of the nearby heliports. Therefore, no impacts associated with private airport safety hazards would occur and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 identified that the City’s emergency preparedness plan complied with State law and interfaced with other cities and counties within Southern California. The City also participates in the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services administers SEMS and coordinates multi‐agency responses to disasters. SEIR No. 339 noted that the PTMLUP would intensify development densities in the area. As outlined in Addendum No. 4 for the A‐Town Metro component of the Platinum Triangle, Project implementation would result in a reduction in development densities within the Project Area. Regardless, new development would be required to accommodate emergency vehicles in addition to other measures prescribed in to ensure adequate emergency response and operation. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 identified that the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F, contains no undeveloped wildland areas within its boundaries or in adjacent areas. The PTMLUP would not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Because no impacts related to wildlands would occur, no mitigation was required. The areas within and adjacent to the Project Area are urban and developed. No wildland areas susceptible to fires exist in the Project Area or adjacent areas. No impacts related to wildland fires would occur and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts regarding hazardous materials would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 26 a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? £ £ £ R £ b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? £ £ £ R £ c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: £ £ £ R £ i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; £ £ £ R £ ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; £ £ £ R £ iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or £ £ £ R £ iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? £ £ £ R £ d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? £ £ £ R £ e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? £ £ £ R £ This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Geotechnical Recommendations Parcel “F” A-Town Metro Project, 1404 E. Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, Group Delta Consultants, Inc., August 27, 2021 (Appendix A) • Hydrology Analysis For A-Town Tract 17703, Lot 5 – Area F, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc., October 19, 2021 (Appendix B) • Project Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, A-Town – Development Area “F”, Tract No. 17703, Lot 5, Permit No. OTH2021-01391, Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc., August 27, 2021 (Appendix C) Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would not substantially increase the amount of impervious surface. During grading and construction activities, there would be a potential for surface water runoff to carry sediment and small quantities of pollutants into the stormwater runoff. However, SEIR No. 339 noted that the PTMLUP would comply with current water quality regulations, including the City Grading Ordinance, the Construction General Permit, the County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit, the City of Anaheim’s Local Implementation Plan, and the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), as required by Mitigation Measure 3‐2. This would include preparation of an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, a SWPPP, and a WQMP and implementation of construction and operational BMPs to reduce potential water quality impacts to a less than significant level. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 27 SEIR No. 339 found that the increased development intensities within the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, would result in additional demands on groundwater supplies. To meet projected water demand, the City would upgrade the initial production rate of a previously proposed new water well in the Platinum Triangle and would drill an additional new well at a location to be determined. SEIR No. 339 concluded that construction of an additional groundwater well in Anaheim would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies due to the location of the new water well in relation to the Orange County Water District (OCWD) Groundwater Basin. SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts related to groundwater supplies would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval. In addition, an updated 2009 Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was prepared by Psomas that assessed the availability of domestic water since the approval of the PTMLUP. Since preparation of the 2009 WSA, the OCWD has completed the expansion of its Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) from 75 to 100 million gallons per day. This expansion increases the reliability of the Orange County Basin of which Anaheim has historically obtained approximately 70 percent of its water supply. Furthermore, groundwater is anticipated to be greater than 50 feet below existing surface. Based on soils investigation conducted for the overall A-Town improvements, which includes Area F, groundwater is estimated at depths greater than 65’ below ground surface. The Project would not be excavating to depths greater than 50 feet below existing surface and would not interfere with groundwater. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 noted that the PTMLUP involved redevelopment of existing land uses and would not substantially increase the amount of impervious surface area. As a result, the runoff rates were expected to remain approximately the same as under existing conditions. SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with the design requirements of the City and the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) would ensure that property owners/developers would properly convey and discharge runoff. Furthermore, no stream or river exists within the limits of the A‐Town Metro Master Plan, including Area F. As previously indicated, the existing Site has been significantly altered in order to support commercial development that previously existed. Although project implementation would result in the conversion of the property from an undeveloped Site to a residential development on Area F and would result in alterations that would affect existing drainage conditions, it is anticipated that the existing surface drainage conditions and characteristics would generally be maintained. Although additional grading and landform alteration necessary to prepare the Site for development could result in some erosion during that phase of construction, BMPs would be implemented pursuant to a SWPPP in order to prevent downstream transport of sediments resulting from site grading. BMPs are required pursuant to the NPDES and also prescribed by the City and reflected in SEIR No. 339. Furthermore, Grading Plans prepared for proposed development must include an approved drainage and erosion control plan to minimize the impacts from erosion and sedimentation during grading. Additionally, development sites that encompass an area of 1.0 acre or greater would be subject to compliance with the NPDES program’s General Construction Permit requirements and consequently the development and implementation of an SWPPP as prescribed by the City of Anaheim. In addition, the Project would be in compliance with the City’s grading and excavation ordinance, which would ensure minimal topsoil loss from potential erosion. As stipulated in that document, the property owner/developer has prepared a WQMP to submit to the RWQCB, in accordance with the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (refer to Appendix C). The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, describes the structural and nonstructural BMPs that would be implemented during construction (short‐term) within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long‐term operation of the Project Area. Long‐term measures include, but may not be limited to, street sweeping, trash collection, proper materials storage, designated wash areas connected to sanitary sewers, filter and grease traps, and clarifiers for surface parking areas. Implementation of the BMPs ensure that potential erosion and siltation would not be transported downstream and, therefore, would not adversely affect downstream drainage features. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Because SEIR No. 339 determined that these impacts were less than significant, no mitigation was required. SEIR No. 339 noted that the PTMLUP involved redevelopment of existing land uses and would not substantially increase the amount of impervious surface area. As a result, the runoff rates were expected to remain approximately the same as under existing conditions. SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with the design requirements of the City and the OCFCD would ensure that property owners/developers properly convey and discharge runoff as appropriate. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 determined that impacts would be less than significant. It should be noted that the A‐Town Metro property, which includes Area F, has been extensively altered as a result of past grading and development that occurred on the Site. No natural drainage course exists due to the extent of alteration to the Site and surrounding area within the drainage area. In the pre‐project condition, runoff from the graded pad areas is contained within each paid and allowed to infiltrate into underlying soils. Runoff from Area F is retained on-site and any overflows discharging to the existing storm drain system in Park Street and Union Street and conveyed to the existing storm drain facility in Gene Autry Way and then conveyed approximately one mile south to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel (County Facility No. C05) and Haster Retarding Basin (County Facility No. C05B02). Further downstream receiving waters include Bolsa Chica Wetlands, Huntington Harbour and Anaheim Bay. The conditions do not change the conclusion of SIER No. 339 regarding runoff at the Project Site. As discussed in the WQMP for the Project (refer to Appendix C), the Project would be responsible for incorporating Low Impact Development (LID) principles and BMPs into design features and evaluating LID measures in the following treatment hierarchy: infiltration, evapo‐transpiration, harvest/reuse and bio‐treatment. The proposed Project Site drainage pattern is consistent with existing drainage patterns, with all flows conveyed south to Gene Autry Way. Time of concentration for the Project’s runoff is anticipated to A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 28 decrease due to the proposed residential land use, in comparison to the pre-project condition. The Project will minimize impervious area by providing all multi-level structures and incorporating landscaping within the Project’s opens space areas, parkways, areas between residential buildings and other suitable landscaping areas to minimize the Project’s impervious footprint, thereby reducing runoff generated during rain events. As discussed in more detail below, first flush flows produced from the Area F would be collected in the proposed inlets throughout the Site, then diverted in the proposed diversion structures to drain to proposed Modular Wetland Systems. Treated flows are then stored in the proposed storage vaults. Area F LID measures propose to retain water quality flows (non-storm water flows and the Design Capture Volume) on-site for the Project Site Drainage Management Areas (DMA) (refer to Appendix C for details). To meet the trash capture requirements of the Ocean Plan, Area F’s on-site catch basins would be equipped with automatic retractable screens and connection pipe screens constructed of corrosion resistant materials and meeting the “Full Capture” design criteria. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that compliance with the established regulations (e.g., the local grading ordinance, the State General Construction Permit, and the County MS4 Permit) would ensure that effects are less than significant. Compliance with the State General Construction Permit was specified in Mitigation Measure 3‐2 from SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 concluded that development would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation was required. Furthermore, pursuant to the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Title 10, Chapter 09, Section 030.010, the Project proposed for Area F is subject to the requirements of New Development and Significant Redevelopment projects to control urban runoff, in accordance with County of Orange Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). As indicated above, Project implementation would not result in a significant increase in either the volume or velocity of surface water resulting from the increase in impervious surfaces. The Project’s drainage patterns design would maximize opportunities to convey stormwater to areas that would maximize the effectiveness of the LID BMPs prescribed in the WQMP. It is important to note that the new NPDES permits impose more stringent BMPs. As a result, water quality impacts would be expected to be much less that what was previously envisioned in the SEIR No. 339. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that compliance with the established regulations (e.g., the local grading ordinance, the State General Construction Permit, and the County MS4 Permit) would ensure that effects would be less than significant. Compliance with the State General Construction Permit was specified in Mitigation Measure 3‐2 from SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 concluded that development would not create or contribute runoff water that would substantially degrade water quality. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation was required. Although conversion of the Site as proposed would not result in any unique or unusual water quality impacts, site preparation, grading and construction could result in some erosion potential and the potential for a discharge of silt and other pollutants associated with the proposed development into the surface waters. However, as indicated above, it would be necessary to implement a SWPPP, WQMP and related BMPs, to ensure that water quality impacts that may occur during grading and construction are minimized. Implementation of the BMPs prescribed in the SWPPP would avoid potentially significant water quality impacts during the construction phase of Area F. As a result, project‐related construction impacts to water quality would be less than significant and remain within the analysis and conclusion of SEIR No. 339. In addition, non‐structural and structural BMPs included in the WQMP would ensure that potential long‐term, post‐development water quality impacts are also avoided or reduced to a less than significant level and would remain within the analysis and conclusion of SEIR No 339. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. According to SEIR No. 339, the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, is located within Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zones A99 and X. The design of all aboveground structures would be at least 3 feet higher than the 100‐year flood zone unless otherwise required by the City Engineer, and all structures below this level are required to be flood‐proofed. Therefore, impacts related to the placement of housing within a 100‐year flood zone were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was required. According to SEIR No. 339, the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, is located within FEMA Flood Zones A99 and X. Because the Project Area is not located within the 100‐year flood zone and protected by a levee, the Project Site is not subject to flooding associated with a 100‐year storm and future residential development would not be subject to a significant flood hazard. The existing levee that provides flood protection in the area is maintained by the OCFCD and is regularly inspected to ensure that failure of the levee does not occur. Therefore, impacts related to the placement of structures within a 100‐year flood zone were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was required. According to SEIR No. 339, the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, is located within FEMA Flood Zones A99 and X. Although the Project Area, including Area F, is protected from flooding by a levee as indicated above, Project implementation would not expose either people or structures to flood hazards as a result of the failure of either a dam or levee. The existing levee that provides flood protection in the area is maintained by the OCFCD and is regularly inspected to ensure that failure of the levee does not occur. Nonetheless, in the event of a failure that may result in flooding within the Project Area, the City would implement emergency operation procedures A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 29 necessary to protect the public health and welfare. Therefore, impacts related to flooding were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation was required. SEIR No. 339 found that the topography within the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, is flat and not subject to mudflow. According to the City’s General Plan, no enclosed bodies of water are in the immediate vicinity of the Site; therefore, no impacts from seiches are anticipated as a result of Project implementation. The City of Anaheim is located well inland, away from the Orange County coastline. Due to the elevation and the distance from the coastline, tsunami hazards do not exist for the Project Site and vicinity. Similarly, the Site is essentially flat and devoid of steep slopes (either natural or manmade) that could be undermined by seismic activity or other instability to cause mud. Therefore, no impacts associated with inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would occur, and no mitigation was required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts related to hydrology and water quality would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Physically divide an established community? £ £ £ R £ b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. According to SEIR No. 339, the PTMLUP would increase the adopted development intensities and expand the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, which would not physically divide an established community by creating physical or perceived barriers to movement within a community. Across from the Area F, to north along Park Street, are the future A-Town Development Areas C and D. To the east of the Area F is the future A-Town Development Area E and the Southern California Gas Company office campus. To the south of the Area F is Gene Autry Way and an existing industrial office building, the George T. Hall Company. To the west of the Area F is Union Street, A-Town Development Area G, comprised of multi-family residential uses, and a public park, the Aloe Greens Park. Although the use of the Area F would change from its present undeveloped condition, Project implementation would not divide or otherwise adversely affect or change and established community because the development located adjacent to the Site is comprised of a variety of land uses. The future development of Area F would be compatible with the adjacent and nearby land uses. Furthermore, Area F does not contain any features or elements (e.g., roadways, channels, incompatible development, etc.) that would physically divide the existing residential neighborhoods in the Project vicinity. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts related to division of an established community would occur and no mitigation was required. Area F would include development of 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units. The proposed number of dwelling units is consistent with the development allocation of the A-Town Metro Master Site Plan for Development Area F, which allows for a range of 70 to 132 dwelling units. Future development proposed within the Project Site would be consistent with all the applicable goals and policies of the General Plan, Land Use, Economic Development, and Community Design Elements as reflected in Table 5.4‐1 in SEIR No. 339. The Project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and would comply with applicable design guidelines. Furthermore, any potential impacts previously identified in SEIR No. 339 would be avoided or lessened through the implementation of the mitigation measures applicable A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 30 to the A‐Town Metro project prescribed in SEIR No. 339. Finally, development within the A‐Town Metro Master Plan area would provide housing and employment opportunities within the City, consistent with the long‐range goals and objectives. As a result, the Project would continue to achieve the goals, objectives, and policies of the relevant adopted plans and programs of the Anaheim General Plan. SEIR No. 339 also concluded that the PTMLUP would be inconsistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Public Services and Facilities Element Goal 8.1 because high‐rise residential towers proposed as part of the A‐Town Metro Project could potentially interview with an existing Southern California Gas Company (SCG) microwave tower. No feasible mitigation was available to minimize the potential conflict with the microwave tower’s telecommunication function; therefore, impacts were concluded to be significant and unavoidable. This potential impact required the City Council to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address significant and unavoidable impacts resulting from the implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Although Addendum No. 4 includes a provision that would limit the maximum building height within the A‐Town Metro Master Plan area to 100 feet, due to the location, elevation, and height of the SCG microwave tower, the reduction in the maximum building height proposed would not lessen or eliminate that significant unavoidable adverse impact. Area F development would have a maximum building height of 38 feet. Thus, the inconsistency (and significant unavoidable impact) previously cited in SEIR No. 339 would not change as a result of the Project. As previously concluded in SEIR No. 339, this conflict would remain significant and unavoidable; however, it is neither a new impact nor would it result in a more severe impact than previously identified. In addition to the consistency determinations related to the Anaheim General Plan, the Project would also be consistent with other applicable regional plans and programs, including Compass/Growth visioning principles identified in SCAG’s Compass Blueprint 2% Strategy, and SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan. According to SEIR No. 339, the Approved Project would not affect an HCP or an NCCP because the Platinum Triangle is not a part of either of these plans. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts to HCPs or NCCPs would occur, and no mitigation was required. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts conflicting with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulations would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XII. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? £ £ £ R £ b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that no mineral resources were in the Platinum Triangle, including Area F. No loss of mineral resources would occur, and no mitigation was required. The City of Anaheim General Plan (Figure G‐3, Mineral Resource Map) does not identify the Project Area as a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area or within Mineral Resource Zone 2 (MRZ‐2). The Project would not A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 31 result in impacts to mineral resources and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that the City of Anaheim General Plan does not identify the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, as a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area. SEIR No. 339 concluded that no loss of mineral resources would occur, and no mitigation was required. The Project Area is not identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan (Figure G‐3, Mineral Resource Map) as a Regionally Significant Aggregate Resource Area or within MRZ‐2. Therefore, the Project would not result in impacts to locally important mineral resource recovery sites and no mitigation is required. The Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XIII. NOISE – Would the Project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? £ £ £ R £ b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? £ £ £ R £ c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? £ £ £ R £ This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Final Acoustical Report, A-Town Metro Master Land Use Plan Project – Parcel F, City of Anaheim, California, LSA, August 2021 (Appendix D) The Project Site and their vicinities are located within an urban area that is developed with a variety of land uses, including single‐ and multiple‐family residential, commercial, institutional, sports, transportation‐related, and other land uses. The primary existing ambient noise sources in the Project Area are transportation facilities. Traffic on South State College Boulevard, East Katella Avenue, Interstate- 5 (I-5), and other adjacent roadways is a steady source of ambient noise. Construction noise in the Project vicinities was also observed. Lastly, the Project Site is located between two event and entertainment centers that have regular firework shows during typical, non- pandemic conditions. Disneyland, located approximately 1.77 miles northwest of the Project Site, has nightly firework shows around 9:30 p.m. Located approximately 0.48 miles to the east of the Project Site, Angel Stadium has a firework show at the end of Saturday night baseball games which occur March through September. It is also possible that other events at Angel Stadium throughout the year may have firework shows, but those are not regularly scheduled. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 32 Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP had potential to expose people to noise levels in excess of City of Anaheim General Plan and Noise Ordinance standards. The noise would primarily be derived from vehicular traffic, especially on Gene Autry Way from I‐5 to State College Boulevard and on State College Boulevard from Orange Avenue to Gene Autry Drive. In addition, SEIR No. 339 found that noise‐sensitive residential uses may be exposed to mobile and stationary‐source noise levels exceeding State and/or City standards. Further, building facades exposed to greater than 69 A‐weighted decibels (dBA) would need to be improved architecturally to achieve a 45 dBA community noise equivalent interior noise level limit. SEIR No. 339 included Mitigation Measures 5‐1, 5‐2, 5‐3, 5‐4, 5‐5, 5‐7, 5‐8, 5‐9, and 5‐10 to reduce noise impacts by requiring noise reduction improvements for residences and disclosure of abnormal noise levels prior to approval of project construction, and restrictions on hours of operations for construction activities, as well as construction equipment maintenance requirements. Even with these measures, the noise impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable, and the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. The Project would require construction activities which would create temporarily increased noise levels for the surrounding areas. Noise impacts during construction of the Project were previously addressed in SEIR No. 339 at a programmatic level. According to the City’s Noise Ordinance, noise sources associated with construction are exempt from the City’s Noise Ordinance standards between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. While the City exempts construction noise from the City noise standards at the property line when construction occurs during these hours, construction noise would have the potential to generate noise levels well above the existing ambient noise levels. The property owner/developer would implement Mitigation Measures 5‐7, 5‐8, 5‐9, and 5‐10 to reduce impacts related to increased noise levels by requiring construction vehicles and equipment to operate at certain times of the day and with proper operating procedures. The Project does not include an expansion of the roadway improvements previously identified in SEIR No. 339. Area F development would include development of 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units with a residential density of 14 dwelling units per acre, which is below the development allocation of 16 to 30 dwelling units per acre for Development Area F of the A- Town Master Site Plan. Along with the residential buildings and associated infrastructure, common area improvements would include a recreation center with a pool, spa, and community room and pocket park for residents to use. As explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro based on the proposed modified land use plan would result in a decrease in the number of vehicles and vehicle miles traveled. Therefore, although Project implementation would result in a reduction in project‐ related traffic, both on a daily and peak hour basis, it is anticipated that potential noise impacts would be similar, albeit slightly reduced, as the noise level projections along the roadway segments identified previously. Therefore, the Project is not expected to generate additional traffic noise beyond what was assumed in SEIR No. 339. Mitigation Measure 5‐1 in SEIR No. 339 would reduce impacts associated with operational noise produced by the Project. With implementation of Mitigation Measures 5‐1, 5‐7, 5‐8, 5‐9, and 5‐10, any improvements associated with the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts beyond those analyzed in SEIR No. 339. Because residential development is proposed along the Park Street in the northern limits of the property as well as existing residential development along Union Street, to the west, these sensitive land uses would be subject to virtually the same noise level exposure as identified and described in SEIR No. 339. Furthermore, other sensitive land uses along those same roadway segments would also be adversely affected by the high roadway noise levels. Because the traffic generated by the Project would not result in an increase in noise levels but rather result in a potential decrease, the Project as currently proposed would not result in any new significant impacts; the potential impacts identified and described in SEIR No. 339 would not change significantly. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would potentially create excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The vibration and noise would be created by construction activities in the vicinity of vibration‐sensitive land uses and could also impact any housing located near the Amtrak/Metrolink Orange County Line. SEIR No. 339 included Mitigation Measure 5‐5 to reduce groundborne noise and vibration impacts from pile driving and Mitigation Measure 5‐6 to reduce the impacts created by groundborne vibration and noise to vibration‐sensitive land uses in close proximity to the Orange County Line. However, even with these mitigation measures, the impacts remained significant and unavoidable, and the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. Groundborne vibration would be generated by construction equipment during construction activities for the Project, primarily during the demolition, grading, and foundation phases of such development within the Area F. Unless there are extremely large generators of vibration, such as pile drivers, or receptors in close proximity to construction equipment, vibration is generally only perceptible at structures when vibration rattles windows, picture frames, and other objects. The maximum levels of vibration that would be experienced at vibration‐sensitive structures located 25 feet from the construction equipment would vary from about 60 VdB to over 110 VdB. Adequate mitigation measures were prescribed to ensure that potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Project implementation would not result in any new potentially significant noise impacts and no additional mitigation measures are required. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 33 SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would result in a substantial, permanent increase in the ambient traffic noise levels in the vicinity of existing noise‐sensitive receptors. SEIR No. 339 established mitigation measures to reduce the impacts on ambient noise levels; however, the impacts remain significant and unavoidable, and the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. As explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro, based on the proposed modified land use plan, would result in a decrease in the number of vehicles and vehicle miles traveled. Therefore, it would be anticipated that some noise levels projected within the Project Area, including Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard, would be reduced to some degree based on the reduction in traffic. However, the noise levels throughout the Project Area would not be significantly reduced and the potentially significant adverse noise impacts would remain despite the reduction in traffic associated with the Project. Therefore, where applicable, the Project would be subject to the same mitigation measures identified in SEIR No. 339. Project implementation would not result in any new potentially significant impacts and no additional mitigation measures are required. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP could result in a substantial temporary increase in noise levels created by construction near existing noise‐sensitive receptors. SEIR No. 339 included Mitigation Measures 5‐7, 5‐8, 5‐9, and 5‐10 to reduce the temporary impacts on ambient noise levels; however, the impacts remain significant and unavoidable, and the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when SEIR No. 339 was certified. Construction activities would temporarily increase noise levels in the vicinity of Area F. Noise impacts during construction of the Project were previously addressed in SEIR No. 339 at a programmatic level. There are existing residences west of Area F which could experience a temporary construction noise nuisance. A construction noise mitigation plan must be developed and implemented for activity occurring within 200 feet of these residences. The use of smaller equipment and notification of potentially affected residents of the duration of adjacent heavy equipment operations can reduce construction noise. In order to reduce short‐term construction‐related noise impacts, several mitigation measures were prescribed in SEIR No. 339, including MM 5‐7 through MM 5‐10. MM 5‐7 requires that the developer ensure that noise levels at the property boundary not exceed 60 dBA between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., limit the hours of use of equipment that generates excessive noise levels to 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., and properly maintain and employ muffler systems on all construction equipment. The other measures include proper maintenance and tuning of all construction equipment (MM 5‐8), location of all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators, compressors, etc.) away from noise‐sensitive receptors (MM 5‐9), and restricting material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing to the hours set forth in Section 6.70 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (MM 5‐10). As concluded in SEIR No. 339, construction‐related noise impacts would remain significant and unavoidable despite the implementation of mitigation measures; however, the proposed reduction in residential and commercial development would not result in any new or more severe construction‐related noise impact than those identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, is not located in an area with an airport land use plan for the Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport. The people living in the Platinum Triangle would not be exposed to excessive noise levels from air operations. SEIR No. 339 determined that no impacts related to airport land use plans would occur and no mitigation was required. The Project Area is not located in a zone that is regulated by an airport land use plan. The Project would not create additional exposure of people to excessive air traffic noise. No impacts related to airport noise would occur and no mitigation is required. Therefore, the Project would not result in new significant impacts or increase the severity of impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that no private airstrips are located within the City; however, two heliports are located near the Platinum Triangle, including Area F. In addition, APD conducts helicopter training exercises in the parking lot of Angel Stadium of Anaheim. Although implementation of the Project would place more people in the vicinity of heliport noise, the Project would not contribute to an increase in noise from these sources. SEIR No. 339 determined that the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation was required. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning noise impacts would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. No mitigation is applicable. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 34 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? £ £ £ R £ b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would directly induce population growth by allowing additional residential development and indirectly induce population growth by allowing additional nonresidential development in the Platinum Triangle. Area F development would include development of 17 multi-family residential buildings for a total of 73 dwelling units with a residential density of 14 dwelling units per net acre, which is below the development allocation of 16 to 30 dwelling units per acre for Development Area F of the A-Town Master Site Plan. Along with the residential buildings and associated infrastructure, common area improvements would include a recreation center with a pool, spa, and community room and pocket park for residents to use. Overall, as explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro based on the proposed modified land use plan, implementation of the Project would result in a reduction in the total number of dwelling units within the A‐Town Metro property when compared to the impact analysis of the SEIR No. 339. The buildout of A‐Town Metro under Addendum No. 4 would allow for a maximum, of 1,746 apartments and condominiums, compared to 2,681 high density residential dwelling units currently approved for the same area. The reduction of 935 dwelling units would reduce the total number of dwelling units permitted in the Platinum Triangle to 17,974 dwelling units. As a result, the total population estimated for the Platinum Triangle would be reduced to 26,961 residents, compared to 28,364 estimated for the 18,909 approved dwelling units. In addition, the potential employment generated within the A‐Town Metro area would also be reduced based on the reduction of 100,000 square feet of retail/commercial development, resulting in a maximum of 50,000 square feet for A‐Town Metro. The total number of jobs estimated for the Platinum Triangle would also be reduced from 300 to 100 as a result of the reduction in the retail/commercial floor area currently proposed. Further, SEIR No. 339 concluded that buildout of the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F, would result in a jobs/housing ratio more balanced when compared to the existing conditions in the area. No impacts were identified, and no mitigation was required. SEIR No. 339 determined that implementation of the PTMLUP would not displace any units of housing. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 determined that no impacts related to housing displacement would occur and no mitigation was required. The Project Site does not support housing at the present time. Project implementation includes the conversion of existing vacant property to a high-density residential development for Area F, albeit at lower development intensities than previously approved for A‐Town Metro. Implementation of the Project would not result in the elimination of any existing residential dwelling units and would not require the provision of any replacement housing. Therefore, no new significant impacts to the City’s existing housing inventory would occur and no mitigation measures are required. SEIR No. 339 determined that the PTMLUP would not displace any people and no construction of replacement housing would be required. As indicated above, Project implementation would not result in the elimination of any existing residential dwelling units, and therefore, would not displace any residents in the City of Anaheim. Although the Project would result in a reduction in the number of dwelling units previously approved by the City for the A‐Town Metro property, the Project does include the development of up to 73 apartments that would be added to the City’s inventory of housing, which would increase the City’s housing stock. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that no impacts related to displacement of people would occur and no mitigation was required. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 35 No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning loss of existing housing resources would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XV. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objective for any of the following public services: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Fire Protection? £ £ £ R £ b. Police Protection? £ £ £ R £ c. Schools? £ £ £ R £ d. Parks? £ £ £ R £ e. Other Public Facilities? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. Fire Protection: SEIR No. 339 determined that the higher‐density population and increased population capacity resulting from the PTMLUP would delay Anaheim Fire District’s (AFD) response time for first engine response, increase demand for other services of the AFD, and require additional fire facilities. As discussed in Addendum No. 4, no fire stations currently exist within the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Area, however, the two nearest fire stations are located approximately one‐half mile from the Project Area. Stadium Station #7 is located at 2222 East Ball Road, and Resort Station #3 is located at 1717 South Clementine. AFD has a plan to construct three new fire stations to serve the Project Area. The first station, the Battalion Headquarters Station would be located along Santa Cruz Street north of Orangewood Avenue, the second station would be in the north central area of the Platinum Triangle, and the third station would be located at an undetermined location. Additional property taxes would be collected from the new residential projects in the Platinum Triangle, including the development on Area F, and these would be used to cover the additional staffing needs. In addition, the Public Safety Impact Fee would be collected at the time of issuance of building permits for development projects within the Platinum Triangle, which would provide funds for the construction of new fire facilities. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with fire protection facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measures 7‐1 and 7‐2, which require installation of fire sprinklers on new buildings and payment of impact fees as identified in the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC), Chapter 17.36. Police Protection: SEIR No. 339 determined that the higher‐density population and increased population capacity resulting from the PTMLUP would require an increase in police facilities and staffing by APD. The two nearest police facilities are Main Station, located 3.5 miles west of the Platinum Triangle at 425 South Harbor Boulevard and South Station, located 3.6 miles west of the Platinum Triangle at 1520 Disneyland Drive. SEIR No. 339 determined that a Public Safety Impact Fee, which would be applicable to the Project, would assist with the generation of funds for facilities and equipment for police activities. Additionally, the increase in property taxes collected from the new developments, including Area F, would be expected to cover staffing needs for the law enforcement. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with police protection facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measures 7‐3, 7‐4, 7‐ A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 36 5, 7‐6, and 7‐7, which require APD to review plans for new developments and for property owners/developers to pay associated police fees. Schools: SEIR No. 339 concluded that residential development within the Platinum Triangle would create approximately 4,018 additional elementary and middle school students in the Anaheim City School District (ACSD) and approximately 1,549 additional high school students in the Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD). Area F would be within the attendance boundaries of Paul Revere Elementary School, South Junior High School, and Katella High School. As discussed in Addendum No. 4, a demographic consultant for the ACSD conducted a survey of current student generation rates for residential projects in Southern California that are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the Platinum Triangle, including Area F, and found the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate fewer students than the number of students expected to be generated from the traditional housing type. Additionally, the serving elementary school is located outside the boundaries of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Area; therefore, Project implementation would create a need for additional buses and supporting services. However, the SEIR No. 339 found that developer payment of school fees levied by ACSD and AUHSD would reduce potential school‐ related impacts to a less than significant level. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with schools to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 7‐8 and 7‐9, which require coordination with schools and payment of school fees. Parks: SEIR No.339 determined that the increase in residential development associated with the PTMLUP would increase demand for parks and other recreational facilities. As mentioned above, Area F development would be comprised of 73 dwelling units. Common areas are proposed for Area F, along with a recreation center with a pool, spa, and community room and pocket park for residents to use. Though the Project would provide open space and recreational facilities, it is expected that residents would use local parks. Therefore, implementation of the Project would increase wear and tear on park facilities and require greater maintenance for park facilities. SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with Section 18.20.110.010 of the AMC, establishing recreational space requirements for the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, would ensure that adequate recreational space would be provided to support the population growth in the Platinum Triangle area, including Area F. With compliance with this regulation and incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 8‐1, 8‐2, and 8‐3, which would require the acquisition and construction of park areas in adequate amounts for the development, SEIR No. 339 determined the impacts to be less than significant. Other Public Facilities: SEIR No. 339 identified that the PTMLUP could potentially affect the library system in the local area. The Anaheim library system includes a central library and six branch libraries along with the Anaheim Heritage Center, Founders Park, Books on the Go! (self-service kiosk at Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center), and mobile library services including a mobile library and STEAM Van. Increased population would increase demand for these facilities and the services they provide. As discussed in Addendum No. 4, the nearest library facility to the Project Area is the Sunkist Branch Library located at 901 South Sunkist Avenue. A joint use library facility with the Anaheim Elementary School District (AESD) is located at 2135 South Mountain View Avenue. The Project Area is also served by virtual Anaheim Library services through the network at the Central Library located at 500 West Broadway. Population growth affects online resources because the basis for licensing fees for these databases, eBooks, and other digital resources are generally the population of the library’s service area. With additional residents to serve, the Project would reduce the overall availability per capita of books, media, computers, and library public service space. Therefore, in order to maintain current per capita levels and licensing agreements, the City would need to provide additional physical and virtual resources to the Anaheim library system. Mitigation Measure 7‐10 requires the payment of developer fees to assist with providing additional materials and services at the libraries servicing the population within the Platinum Triangle, which would include Area F. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with library facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 7‐10. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning public services would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 37 XVI. RECREATION – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? £ £ £ R £ b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 determined that the increase in residential development associated with the PTMLUP would increase demand for parks and other recreational facilities. This would increase wear and tear on park facilities and require greater maintenance efforts. However, as discussed in Addendum No. 4, the revised A‐Town Metro land use plan would result in the future development of a maximum of 1,746 dwelling units, which is approximately 35 percent fewer units than the original A‐Town Metro land use plan. In addition, the A‐ Town Metro land use plan has been redesigned to relocate and reconfigure the parks/recreational facilities that were approved for the same area. The approved land use plan for the A‐Town Metro area includes two parks encompassing 3.0 acres and 0.5 acre. With the reduction in residential density with the A‐Town Metro land use plan, these parks would be replaced and reconfigured with a 1.2‐acre public park and a 0.6‐acre public linear park extending from Meridian Street as an extension of Market Street south to Gene Autry Way. The 1.8 acres of public parks included in the revised A‐Town Metro land use plan complies with the mini‐park requirement to provide 44 square feet of parkland for each dwelling unit. SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with Section 18.20.110.010 of the AMC, establishing recreational space requirements for the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, would ensure recreational space in an amount that supports the population growth in the Platinum Triangle. Therefore, with compliance with this regulation along with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 8‐1, 8‐2, and 8‐3, which would require the acquisition and construction of park areas in adequate amounts for each development, SEIR No. 339 determined the impacts to be less than significant. SEIR No.339 determined that the increase in residential development associated with the PTMLUP would increase demand for parks and other recreational facilities. However, as discussed in Addendum No. 4, the revised A‐Town Metro land use plan would result in the development of 1,746 residential dwelling units, which is 935 fewer units than the original A‐Town Metro Master Land Use Plan. The reduction in the number of dwelling units, would create a reduced demand for recreation amenities in the City. Furthermore, such facilities included in the revised A‐Town Metro Plan are consistent with those previously approved for the area and would not, therefore, result in the expansion of recreational facilities that could adversely affect the environment. The SEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance with Section 18.20.110.010 of the AMC, establishing recreational space requirements for the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone, would ensure recreational space in an amount that supports the population growth in the Platinum Triangle. With compliance with this regulation along with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 8‐1, 8‐2, and 8‐3, which would require the acquisition and construction of park areas in adequate amounts for each development, SEIR No. 339 determined the impacts to be less than significant. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning recreational facilities would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. No mitigation measures from SEIR No. 339 are applicable. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 38 XVII. TRANSPORTATION – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? £ £ £ R £ b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? £ £ £ R £ c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? £ £ £ R £ d. Result in inadequate emergency access? £ £ £ R £ This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Transportation Analysis for A-Town Parcel F, LSA, August 24, 2021 (Appendix E) Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 analyzed transportation and traffic impacts related to the implementation of the PTMLUP. The California Natural Resources Agency adopted revised CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018. Among the changes to the guidelines was the removal of vehicle delay and Level of Service (LOS) from consideration for transportation impacts under CEQA. The adopted guidelines, evaluates transportation impacts based on a project’s effect on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Lead agencies were allowed to continue using their current impact criteria until June 30, 2020, or to opt into the revised transportation guidelines. In late 2019, State courts stated that under section 21099, subdivision (b)(2), existing law is that “automobile delay, as described solely by level of service or similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion shall not be considered a significant impact on the environment” under CEQA, except for roadway capacity projects. SEIR No. 339 determined that the Approved Project would conflict with the LOS for the roadway system within the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 required Mitigation Measures 9‐1, 9‐2, 9‐3, 9‐4, 9‐5, 9‐6, 9‐7, 9‐8, 9‐9, 9‐10, 9‐11, 9‐12, 9‐ 13, 9‐14, and 9‐15, which would enhance existing facilities and require the development of alternative forms of transit to minimize the LOS impacts on roadway systems in the Platinum Triangle. Even with the incorporation of these mitigation measures, impacts to the roadway system remained significant and unavoidable and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council when SEIR No. 339 was certified. On June 23, 2020, the City of Anaheim City Council adopted the VMT Thresholds of Significance for purpose of analyzing transportation impacts and also approved the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for CEQA Analysis. Per the City’s TIA Guidelines, certain projects that meet specific screening criteria are presumed to have a less than significant impact with respect to CEQA Section 15064.3 absent substantial evidence to the contrary.3 There are three project-screening types that lead agencies can apply to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment. A project only needs to fulfill one of the screening types below to qualify for screening. These screening types are summarized below: Type 1: Transit Priority Area Screening. A Transit Priority Area is defined as a half-mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor. Projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) may have a less than significant VMT impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project has a total floor area ratio of less than 0.75, includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction, 3 City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis, June 2020. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 39 Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy, or replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units. Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening. A low VMT-generating area is an area that has a VMT per service population metric that is 15% below the County average. Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area may have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Other employment-related and mixed-use projects within a low VMT-generating area may also be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the project can reasonably be expected to generate a VMT per service population metric similar to the existing land uses in the low VMT area. Type 3: Project Type Screening. Some project types are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature. Projects that are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their local serving nature include local-serving K-12 schools, neighborhood and community parks, day care centers, certain local-serving retail uses less than 50,000 square feet, student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses, community and religious assembly uses, public services, local-serving community colleges, affordable or supportive housing, convalescent and rest homes, senior housing, and projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips. Area F is located in a TPA. ARTIC is the train station for the Amtrak national train service and Metrolink commuter rail and also serves as a bus transfer station and a link to the Santa Ana River Trail off‐street bike path. While ARTIC is located more than 0.5 mile from the Project Site, other transit options connect the Project Site to this major transit stop. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) operates fixed‐route bus service in Orange County, including Anaheim. Within the vicinity of the Project Site, two OCTA routes qualify as high‐quality transit corridors. Route 50 operates primarily along Katella Avenue and has a stop at ARTIC, while Route 57 operates primarily along State College Boulevard. Because Area F is within a transit priority area and meets the Type 1 screening criteria for a less than significant VMT impact under the City’s Guidelines, the Project would result in a less than significant impact, and a project‐level VMT quantified analysis is not required under the City’s Guidelines. While the revised CEQA Guidelines prohibit a Lead Agency from using vehicle delay and LOS to evaluate a Project’s transportation impact, the following analysis provides the development of Area F’s consistency with these policies, as well as the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies for informational purposes. The Project for Area F is comprised of 73 townhome dwelling units (39 three‐bedroom units and 34 four‐bedroom units) in a total of 17 buildings. The Trip Generation Memo conducted by LSA determined that the Project would generate approximately 534 new daily trips, with approximately 34 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and approximately 41 new trips during the p.m. peak hour. The trip distribution for the Master Site Plan traffic analysis showed 15 percent of traffic destined northbound on I‐5 and 10 percent of traffic destined westbound on Katella Avenue. Since 25 percent of Project traffic is distributed toward the CMP intersections of the I‐5 ramps with Katella Avenue, a maximum of 10 trips (25 percent x 41 p.m. peak‐hour trips) could potentially travel through these intersections. The trip distribution for the Master Site Plan traffic analysis showed 15 percent of traffic destined northbound on SR‐57 and 5 percent of traffic destined eastbound on Katella Avenue. Since 20 percent of Project traffic is distributed toward the CMP intersections of the SR‐ 57 ramps with Katella Avenue, a maximum of 8 trips (20 percent x 41 p.m. peak‐hour trips) could potentially travel through these intersections. Because Development Area F is anticipated to generate fewer than 100 peak‐hour trips and contribute fewer than 51 trips to any CMP intersection, the Project trip generation is below the threshold established for analysis by the City’s traffic study guidelines. As explained in Addendum No. 4, the buildout of A‐Town Metro, based on the proposed modified land use plan, would result in an overall decrease in the number of vehicles and vehicle miles traveled. Furthermore, the Project would not result in any impacts beyond those identified in the previously certified EIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP would not create sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or any other hazardous design features. Future projects within the Platinum Triangle, including development on Area F, would be required to dedicate land, including construction easements, for the ultimate arterial highway rights‐of‐way to maintain LOS and access to the Platinum Triangle area (Mitigation Measure 9‐14). Therefore, SEIR No. 339 found the impacts related to the design of hazardous project features to be less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures 9‐14 and 9‐15. SEIR No. 339 determined that the property owner/ developer and/or the City would design and improve vehicle access within the Platinum Triangle in accordance with the requirements of the City to reduce any emergency access impacts from buildout of the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F. Development projects, including the Project for Area F, would be reviewed and approved by the AFD prior to issuance of building permits to ensure that sufficient accessibility for emergency vehicles is provided during all phases of construction. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with emergency access to be less than significant with implementation of existing regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, and no mitigation was required. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 40 No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts concerning transportation would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1 (k)? £ £ £ R £ ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant, pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. According to the initial study prepared for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project that was analyzed in SEIR No. 339, no cultural resources are known to exist on the proposed Platinum Triangle area, which includes Area F. During the preparation of SEIR No. 339, a letter requesting consultation with Native American representatives was sent out by the City of Anaheim on March 27, 2014. No responses from any of the Native American representatives contacted were received. No potentially significant impacts are anticipated to occur, due to the nature and extent of surface and subsurface alteration that has occurred as a result of development that has occurred on the Site and in the Project Area. Furthermore, the A‐Town Metro property, which includes Area F, is not known to be utilized by any Native Americans for religious or other culturally important rites and no important cultural resource sites have been identified within the Project Area. Additionally, no formal cemeteries are located on the A‐Town Metro property or in the Project A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 41 environs and no human remains are known to exist in the Project Area. Although Project implementation would require grading and excavation to implement the proposed improvements (i.e., mixed use development), the discovery of human remains is not anticipated. Nonetheless, the Project must comply with applicable laws when human remains are encountered during grading and construction to ensure that no significant impacts to tribal cultural resources, including human remains. In the event that human remains are discovered, construction activities must be halted or diverted until the provisions of §7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and §5097.98 of the Public Resources Code have been implemented. As a result, Project implementation would not result in any new significant impacts and no additional mitigation measures are required. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on tribal cultural resources would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? £ £ £ R £ b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years? £ £ £ R £ c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? £ £ £ R £ d. Generate solid waste in excess of State and local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? £ £ £ R £ e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? £ £ £ R £ This section utilizes the following technical studies in its analysis: • Solid Waste Management Plan, A-Town Development Area F, Lot 5, Tract 17703, Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc., November 2021 (Appendix F) Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 42 Water: SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP would require the addition of new water facilities. Rule 15‐D of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rules, Rates, and Regulations specifies the water facility improvements required to accommodate the projected land use water demands within Anaheim, including within the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F. SEIR No. 339 determined that Water Rule 15‐D of the City’s Water Rules, Rates and Regulations (Plan No. W2524C) would ensure that adequate water facilities are provided to serve the Platinum Triangle area. Furthermore, as discussed in Addendum No. 4, the demand for the Revised A‐Town Master Land Use Plan would be approximately 39 percent lower than the approved plan due to the proposed reduction in development intensity. Finally, based on the water system hydraulic analysis prepared for the A‐Town project, domestic water would be provided by the City of Anaheim through an existing 16‐inch waterline located in Katella Avenue and an existing 12‐inch main located in Gene Autry Way.4 The proposed water system consists of 12‐inch water mains, which are connected to the City’s existing mains. The proposed water system provides pressures greater than 45 pounds per square inch (psi) for all nodes during peak hour demands and pressures greater than 20 psi during maximum day demands as well as 4,000 gallons per minute (gpm) fire flow evens as required by the City. The minimum residual pressure experience for the “worst case” 4,000 gpm fire flow event was 27 psi for the Site. As indicated in the Water System Hydraulic Analysis, all domestic water meters would require individual pressure reduction devices to reduce the pressure to a maximum of 80 psi for each dwelling unit building within the Project Site. As a result, water supply and facilities are adequate to serve the future development with the Project Area. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with new or expanded water treatment facilities to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 10‐1, 10‐2, 10‐3, 10‐4, 10‐5, 10‐6, 10‐7, 10‐8, 10‐9, 10‐10, 10‐11, 10‐12, 10‐13, 10‐14, 10‐15, and 10‐16. SEIR No. 339 determined that based on the Water Supply Assessment for the PTMLUP, surplus water would be available through the 20‐year planning period. SEIR No. 339 impacts associated with water supplies were determined to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 10‐7, 10‐8, 10‐9, 10‐10, 10‐11, 10‐12, 10‐13, 10‐14, 10‐15, and 10‐16. Furthermore, the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan provides water supply planning for a 25-year planning period in five (5)-year increments and identifies water supplies needed to meet existing and future demands. The demand analysis must identify supply reliability under three hydrologic conditions: a normal year, a single-year, and multiple dry years. In its most recent UWMP, the City determined that it would have reliable supplies to meet single-and multiple dry-year demands from 2020 through 2045. Demand would be met through diversified supply and water conservation measures. The UWMP also includes a Water Shortage Contingency Plan that describes policies that MWD and the City have in place to respond to catastrophic interruption and reduction in water supply. Moreover, in May 2015, the City adopted Ordinance No. 6332 amending Chapter 10.18 of the Municipal Code in response to the State Water Resources Control Board's emergency regulations. The Ordinance specifies voluntary and mandatory water conservation measures that can be implemented depending on the level of water shortage. The Project would not exceed water supplies or result in a significant increase in water demand. As discussed in Addendum No. 4, implementation of the Project would result in an overall decrease of water consumed by the residential and commercial development when compared to the Approved A‐Town Master Land Use Plan land uses due to a proposed reduction in development intensity. In addition, as previously noted the Project Site is within the Mixed-Use Overlay Zone of the PTMLUP. This designation allows residential in either a standalone or mixed-use configuration. Therefore, the Project would not result in any impacts beyond those identified in the previously certified SEIR No. 339. Wastewater: SEIR No. 339 determined that buildout of the PTMLUP would require sewer improvements. Wastewater from the City sewer system is conveyed to OCSD’s trunk and interceptor sewers to regional treatment and disposal facilities. The Project Area is served by the Newhope‐Placentia Trunk (State College Avenue), the Olive Subtrunk, the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, and the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line. With implementation of sewer system improvements, the sewer system, including sewer treatment facilities, was anticipated to be adequate for development associated with the PTMLUP, which includes serving Area F. Further, it was determined that the potential for sewer spills during a 10‐year storm event would be low and would not create a significant impact. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with wastewater treatment requirements to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 10‐1, 10‐2, 10‐3, 10‐4, 10‐5, and 10‐6. Stormwater: SEIR No. 339 noted that the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area identified that the existing storm drainage system was deficient under the existing conditions in the Platinum Triangle at the time the SEIR was prepared. SEIR No. 339 concluded that construction of storm drain facilities would occur in compliance with engineering standards and regulations and would not result in a significant environmental effect. Grading Plans prepared for proposed development must include an approved drainage and erosion control plan to minimize the impacts from erosion and sedimentation during grading. Additionally, development sites that encompass an area of 1.0 acre or greater would be subject to compliance with the NPDES program’s General Construction Permit requirements and consequently the development and implementation of an SWPPP as prescribed by the City of Anaheim. In addition, compliance with the City’s grading and excavation ordinance will also ensure that potential erosion and loss of topsoil is minimized. Further, on-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the proposed site work on Area F would be required to meet the City’s and OCFCD flood control criteria including design discharges, design/construction 4 Water System Hydraulic Analysis; Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc.; December 2014. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 43 standards and maintenance features. The Project would result in less imperviousness that would generate a decreased peak runoff volume and flowrate. The Project Site would be graded to convey stormwater as surface flow towards proposed curb‐inlet catch basins, located at relative low points on‐site. The catch basins would convey flows to proposed MWS for water quality treatment through a proposed underground storm drain system. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Project, the Project applicant would have to comply with all applicable regulations and obtain a NPDES stormwater permit to indicate that the Project features BMPs. As such, the Project would not violate water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or stormwater NPDES standards, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impacts associated with stormwater drainage facilities were determined to be less than significant with incorporation of Mitigation Measure10‐17 identified in SEIR No. 339. Electrical Power: SEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation of the PTMLUP would increase the electrical load on existing facilities and would require both upgrades to the existing 12‐kilovolt distribution systems and construction of a new electrical substation. In addition, the Project would be required to comply with the State energy efficiency standards (CCR Title 24), as specified in Mitigation Measures 10‐21, 10‐22, 10‐23, and 10‐24. SEIR No. 339 concluded that with implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts on electrical service would be less than significant. With the necessary system upgrades and facility improvements, SCG would be able to service the Platinum Triangle, which includes Area F, with natural gas. Therefore, SEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts to natural gas would be less than significant. Natural Gas: SEIR No. 339 states that implementation of the PTMLUP would increase the natural gas demand in the Project Area and would require an additional 1.5 miles of gas transmission pipelines; placement of at least two additional pressure limiting stations; and alteration of at least three miles of existing gas mains in the area to increase capacity. With necessary system upgrades and facility improvements, Southern California Gas Company (SCG) would be able to service the PTMLUP, including Area F, with natural gas, which would be provided in accordance with SCG’s policies and extension rules on file with the Public Utilities Commission when the contractual arrangements are made. Although the PTMLUP was found to create additional demands on natural gas supplies and distribution infrastructure, the increased demands would be within the service capabilities of SCG, provided necessary improvements are made in coordination with SCG. SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the PTMLUP would not result in any unavoidable adverse impacts to natural gas service or resources. Telecommunications: AT&T and Time‐Warner provide telephone and cable television service to the PTMLUP, respectively. According to SEIR No. 339, no impacts related to telephone service systems or cable television service was identified. Consequently, SEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to telephone service systems or cable television service. The Project Site is located within an urbanized area within the City of Anaheim, and would be adequately served by telecommunications facilities. The Project would include on-site connections to off-site telecommunication services and facilities in the immediate area of the Project Site. Additionally, facilities and infrastructure for the various telecommunication providers are adequate to serve the needs of the Project. The Project would not result in or require the construction of new or expanded telecommunication facilities. The Project would result in a less than significant impact, and no mitigation measures are required. Solid Waste: SEIR No. 339 determined that the Olinda Alpha Landfill is the closest facility to the Platinum Triangle area and would be the solid waste facility most often receiving waste from the Platinum Triangle, including Area F. The PTMLUP would increase the service demand for solid waste disposal beyond existing conditions for the Olinda Alpha Landfill. As discussed in Addendum No. 4, implementation of the Project would result in an overall decrease of solid waste generated by the residential and commercial development when compared to the approved A‐Town Master Land Use Plan land uses due to a proposed reduction in development intensity. The SEIR concluded that there would be available landfill capacity in the Orange County landfill system to accommodate the anticipated solid waste stream generated by implementation of the PTMLUP. SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with landfill capacity to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 10‐18, 10‐19, and 10‐20. SEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation of the PTMLUP would generate increased construction and operational solid waste in the area. Each development project in the Platinum Triangle, including the project proposed for Area F, would be required to submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and the City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Program, as administered by the City of Anaheim. Area F Trash Management Plans show compliance with AB 939 (1989) requiring 50 percent diversion levels, AB 341 (2008) requiring all business generating four cubic yards of waste per week to actively implement and participate in recycling programs, and AB 1826 (2014) mandating businesses divert organics (refer to Appendix F) for details). SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with solid waste statutes and regulations to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 10‐18, 10‐19, and 10‐20. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 44 No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts associated with solid waste would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? £ £ £ R £ b. Due to the slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? £ £ £ R £ c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risks or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? £ £ £ R £ d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope stability, or drainage changes? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No 339 did not analyze Wildfire as it was previously approved before the 2019 updated CEQA checklist became the new standard. According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone Map for the City of Anaheim, the Project Site is not within a State Responsibility Area. The Project Site is in a Non-Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) zone within a local responsibility area. The Project Site is flat and does not have a slope or other features that could exacerbate wildfire risks. The Project would tie into existing infrastructure that currently serves the Project Site. Project implementation would not result in the new construction, installation, or maintenance of new infrastructure that would exacerbate fire risk. The Project’s construction would not require the complete closure of any public or private streets or roadways during construction. Temporary construction activities would not impede use of the road for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. The Project are in a developed, urbanized area, and surrounded primarily by commercial and residential uses. There are no slopes or hills near the Project Site that would have the potentially expose people or structures to significant risks as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Therefore, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 45 XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact Impacts analyzed in Add. No. 4 No New Impact No Impact a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? £ £ £ R £ b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? £ £ £ R £ c. Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? £ £ £ R £ Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 339/No new impacts. SEIR No. 339 found that the PTMLUP would not degrade the quality of the environment related to biological and cultural resources because the Platinum Triangle is already developed and approved for redevelopment. In addition, the resulting increase in development intensities would not further degrade the quality of the environment. No impact related to degradation of the quality of the environment would occur and no mitigation was required. As discussed, and analyzed in this document, the Project for Area F would not degrade the quality of the environment. As discussed in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, the Project for Area F would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self‐sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Further, as discussed in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the Project Area does not contain any important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and no impacts to such resources would occur. Therefore, the Project for Area F would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that the PTMLUP would result in cumulatively considerable air quality, GHG, noise, and traffic impacts. As a result of these findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council. As discussed, and analyzed in this document, the Project for Area F would not increase the severity or result in new impacts identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, the Project for Area F would not increase the severity of a previous cumulative impact or result in any new cumulative impacts not already analyzed in SEIR No. 339. SEIR No. 339 found that the PTMLUP would result in significant unavoidable air quality, land use, noise, traffic, and GHG impacts. As a result of these findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council. No changes in circumstances involving the Project have occurred; therefore, the Project would not result in new impacts or impacts of greater severity than those previously identified in SEIR No. 339. No new information of substantial importance is available now which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time of the certification of SEIR No. 339. No new mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously determined to be infeasible are now feasible. Therefore, no new impacts on human beings would occur because of the Project, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. A-Town Development -Area F Project Initial Study Page 46 E KATELLA AVE E GENE AUTRY WAY S STATE COLLEGE BLVDS UNION STS UNION STE PARK ST S UNION STS MARKET STE MERIDIAN ST S METRO DRE. KATELLA AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVES. LEWIS STS . M A N C H E S T E R A V E S. STATE COLLEGE BLVDS.DOUGLASSRDS.LEWISSTApproximately 380 feet South of the intersection of East Katella Avenue and South Metro Drive. DEV No. 2021-00131 Subject Property APN: 232-121-34 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 I (PTMU) DEV 2021-00131 VACANT I (PTMU) Katella Sub-Area B TOWNHOMES/MIXED USE I (PTMU) Katella Sub-Area B I (PTMU) VACANT I (PTMU) VACANT I (PTMU) SERVICE STATION I (PTMU) TOWNHOMES I (PTMU) PARK I (PTMU) VACANT I (PTMU) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY OFFICES I (PTMU) INDUSTRIAL I (PTMU) JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK I (PTMU) JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK I (PTMU) JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PR (PTMU) ANGEL STADIUM OF ANAHEIM E KATELLA AVE E GENE AUTRY WAY S STATE COLLEGE BLVDS UNION STS UNION STE PARK ST S UNION STS MARKET STE MERIDIAN ST S METRO DRE. KATELLA AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVES. LEWIS STS . M A N C H E S T E R A V E S. STATE COLLEGE BLVDS.DOUGLASSRDS.LEWISSTApprox im a t el y 380 f e e t S o u t h of t h e i n t e rsec tion o f E a st K a tel la A venue a n d S o u th Metro Dr ive . D EV N o . 2 0 2 1 -0 0 1 3 1 Subject Property APN: 232-121-34 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 From:Rev. Nathan Biornstad To:Lisandro Orozco Subject:[EXTERNAL] Development Project No: 2021-00131 Date:Wednesday, July 6, 2022 9:05:21 AM Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, I fully support the development project on Lot 5, Track No. 17703. I only wish that they were building more units and building the project taller. In case you need this information, my address is , Anaheim CA 92805 How can I tell if this project has been approved? All the best, Nathan Biornstad 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00022 LOCATION: 1426 South Allec Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is California Roadside Services represented by Dennis DeSnoo; and the property owner is Capital Investment Group. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to permit an existing vehicle towing facility and automotive impound yard. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Common Sense Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; adopt the attached resolution approving Development Permit No. 2022-00022 BACKGROUND: The subject 41,064 square foot project site is developed with approximately 2,020 square feet of office area, 5,670 square feet of indoor storage area, and an approximately 9,002 square foot service yard and service vehicle parking area. The project site is located in the “I” Industrial zone, and is designated for Industrial land uses by the General Plan. The property is located approximately 680 feet north of East Cerritos Avenue and is surrounded on all sides by various industrial and warehouse uses. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to permit the continued use of a vehicle towing facility and automotive impound yard at the subject site. California Roadside Services has been located at the site since 2017 and provides towing services to AAA, the California Highway Patrol, and local law enforcement. The facility consists of a manager’s office, a maintenance building for the company’s tow trucks and equipment, and a temporary storage building for vehicles that have been involved in crimes, potential crimes, or at the request of law enforcement. Most towed vehicles towed go directly to area repair shops, or in some instances, directly to vehicle recycling centers. Development Permit No. 2022-00022 July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 4 The facility is open to Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for office and maintenance staff, and 24 hours a day, seven days a week for tow truck operators. The business has 20 employees, with approximately 10 on site Monday through Friday and fewer than 10 on Saturdays and Sundays. SITE PLAN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a Conditional Use Permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; Development Permit No. 2022-00022 July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 4 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) permits vehicle towing facilities by right, and automotive impound yard uses in the “I” Industrial zone subject to approval of a CUP to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area and uses. As noted above, the subject business has been in operation at this location since 2017 with a valid business license as a towing facility. However, a CUP was never granted for the impound yard portion of the use. The facility’s contract with the California Highway Patrol requires them to have all applicable land use permits. Therefore, the applicant submitted this CUP application to approve the impound yard use. Operations: The facility would continue to operate as it has since 2017. Minor upgrades to the site proposed as part of this application include restriping the parking area to comply with current City standards. There would be no new construction or other physical improvements to the site. All vehicle loading and unloading is done on site. No off-loading of vehicles would occur on neighboring property, parking lots, or in the public street. All vehicles are stored behind the fenced and secured storage yard. No more than five service vehicles are parked on-site at any one time. There are typically 1-2 customers/public coming to the site each day to retrieve their personal belongings from an impounded vehicle. Law enforcement may be required to be on-site once a week. Traffic/Circulation: The proposed use was reviewed by the City’s Traffic Engineering Section. It was determined that the facility would not have a significant impact on traffic. No further traffic impact analysis is required per the current City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. In addition, fire truck and emergency service access was deemed adequate by the Fire Department. Based on the above, the traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area. Parking: The AMC parking requirements for a vehicle towing facility use classification is 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office floor area; 1.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet of indoor storage area; and 0.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of outdoor storage areas. The automotive impound yards use classification requires a parking demand study or parking justification letter to determine the required number of parking spaces for the use. The applicant has provided a parking justification letter (Attachment No. 3). As outlined in the table below, a total of 18 parking spaces are required for the towing facility and 20 spaces are provided on site. In addition, the tow truck parking area can accommodate up to 10 service vehicles. The parking justification letter demonstrates that on average 12 parking spaces are needed per day for non-service vehicles. Based on this analysis, the parking provided on site meets code requirements and exceeds the daily requirements of the parking survey. Development Permit No. 2022-00022 July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Towing Facility Required Parking Proposed Parking Office Floor Area: 2,020 sf @ 4 per 1000 = 8 spaces required 8 Indoor Storage Area: 5,670 sf @ 1.55 per 1000 = 8 spaces 8 Outdoor Storage Area: 4,416 sf @ 0.4 per 1000 = 2 spaces 4 Total Required = 18 Total Provided = 20 spaces Compatibility: The towing facility and impound yard business would not adversely impact adjoining industrial and warehouse land uses because the proposed use would not be more intensive than most industrial and warehouse uses in the vicinity. In addition, staff has visited the site and observed the operations to be non-disruptive and compatible with uses in the vicinity. The proposed use would provide adequate parking, on-site circulation, access, and screening to minimizing any potential impacts to adjoining land uses. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption. The proposed project is located in an industrial area and does not include any new construction and/or ground disturbances, and is therefore covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. CONCLUSION: The request to approve a vehicle towing facility and impound yard would be compatible with the surrounding warehouse and industrial land uses. The project would meet the AMC required number of parking spaces, traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area, and adequate on-site circulation and access would be provided. Under the conditions imposed, the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Based on the analysis included in this report, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the conditional use permit for the proposed towing facility and impound yard. Prepared by, Submitted by, Thomas Gorham Scott Koehm, AICP Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Project Plans 3. Applicant Letter of Operations/Parking Justification 4. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2022-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00022 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2022-00022) (1426 South Allec Street) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Development Permit No. 2022-00022 for a conditional use permit to permit the continued use of an existing vehicle towing facility and automotive impound yard (the “Proposed Project”), at a certain real property located at 1426 South Allec Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is 41,064 square feet in area and is developed with approximately 2,020 square feet of office area, 5,670 square feet of indoor storage area, and an approximately 9,002 square foot service yard and service vehicle parking area. The project site is located in “I” Industrial zone, and is designated for Industrial land uses by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”), to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Development Permit No. 2022-00022 and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures , the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption. The proposed project does not include any new construction and/or ground disturbances, and is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports - 2 - PC2022-*** offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Development Permit No. 2022-00022, does find and determine the following: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within the "I" Industrial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.10.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "I" Industrial Zone; and 2. That the proposed vehicle towing facility and automotive impound yard business would not adversely impact adjoining industrial and warehouse land uses because the proposed use would not be more intensive than most industrial and warehouse uses in the vicinity; and would not adversely affect the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located, because it will be using existing office and storage buildings and an outdoor service yard area, with no new construction or expansion of the existing buildings or service yard. Further, the project would meet the Code required number of parking spaces, traffic generated by the proposed use would not impose an undue burden on streets and highways in the area, and adequate on-site circulation and access would be provided. 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the proposed use would occupy an existing building and service yard without any expansion, and accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets. 5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim in that any potential impacts on the surrounding uses would be minimal; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Permit No. 2022-00022, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Development - 3 - PC2022-*** Permit No. 2022-00022 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2022-*** - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00022 (DEV2022-00022) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL 1 Ongoing during project operations, loading and unloading of all deliveries including vehicle deliveries shall be performed on site. Loading and unloading of vehicle transport trucks/tow-trucks shall not be in the public right of way. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 2 Parking stall dimensions and drive aisle widths shall conform to City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 470 and shall be installed per the approved plans. The subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 3 The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Request submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in that document shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 The applicant shall comply with the following operations conditions: A. Public streets or parking lots shall not be used for outdoor storage, storage of trailers or non-motorized vehicles, automobile washing or detailing, vehicle repair or maintenance, storage of inoperable vehicles, or advertising on vehicles or trailers. B. The outdoor vehicle storage area shall be screened from view from any adjacent public right-of-way. C. There shall be no advertising of vehicles for sale or auction. D. There shall be no outdoor repair and/or maintenance of vehicles. E. There shall be no display of service vehicles or towed/impounded vehicles on public streets. F. All vehicles shall be stored within the storage buildings or within the adjacent storage yard. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 5 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 7 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division 8 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning and Building Department. Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division CERRITOS AFE.A N A H E IM B L V D .E. BALL RD.S. LEWIS ST.S. ALLEC ST.DEBRA LN.5 FWYPROJECT SITE 1426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 928056' - 8"2' - 0"TYPICAL16 GA. GALV. STL. SIGN PAINTEDOSHA BLUE INCL. FASTENERS9 1/2" HIGH ISA SYMBOL AND "MINIMUM FINE $250" PAINTED W/ WHITE REFLECTORIZED PAINT1" R., TYP.1/2" WIDE BORDER PAINTED W/ WHITEREFLECTORIZED PAINTFINISH GRADE OR SLAB, REF. PLAN2" x 2" GALV. STEEL PIPE POSTPARKING ONLY1' - 0"MINIMUM FINE $2506' - 8"2' - 0"TYPICAL16 GA. GALV. STL. SIGN PAINTEDOSHA BLUE INCL. FASTENERS9 1/2" HIGH ISA SYMBOL AND 2 1/4" HIGH "VAN ACCESSIBLE" AND "MINIMUM FINE $250" PAINTED W/ WHITE REFLECTORIZED PAINT1" R., TYP.1/2" WIDE BORDER PAINTED W/ WHITEREFLECTORIZED PAINTFINISH GRADE OR SLAB, REF. PLAN2" x 2" GALV. STEEL PIPE POSTVANACCESSIBLE1' - 0"MINIMUM FINE $250SIGN SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CBC SECTION 1129B.40' -2"2' - 8"0' - 2"0' - 2"2' - 8"0' - 2"WHITE TRAFFIC PAINTSYMBOL & BORDERBLUE BACKGROUND COLOR EQUAL TO 15090 PER FED. STD 595BACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL3' - 0"3' - 0"3' - 0"2' - 0"GA. GALV. STL. SIGN PAINTEDOSHA BLUE INCL. FASTENERS1" HIGH WHITE REFLECTORIZED PAINTED GRAPHICS AS FOLLOWS:NO PARKINGUNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES SUBJECT TOTOW-AWAY AT OWNER'S EXPENSECVC 22658-AMC 14.32.220ANAHEIM POLICE TELEPHONE (714) 765-1900(Ord. 4289 & (part); December 1,1981)1" R., TYP.FINISH GRADE OR SLAB, REF. PLANGALV. STEEL PIPE POST1' - 6"80" MIN.ALONG WALKS6'-0" LONG PRECASTCONCRETE WHEEL STOP(2) #3 BARSA.C. PAVING OR SLAB,SEE PLAN#4 X 24" GALV. BARS @ 24" O.C., MINIMUM 30' - 3"0' - 2 1/2"0' - 2 1/2"0' - 2 1/2"0' - 2 1/2"0' - 7 1/2"0' - 5 1/2"3' - 0"4" WIDE PAINTED BOARDER STRIPES, TYP. (BLUE COLOR) EQUAL TO 15090 PER FED. STD 595B4" WIDE BLUE PAINT STRIPES @36" O.C. AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE135.00°ScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberPREPARED BY:VIVIAN TEETER19390 APPLEWOOD CT.LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530(909) 730-9216As indicated6/20/2022 6:17:52 PMCSCOVERSHEETCALIFORNIA ROADSIDE SERVICECheckerAuthor05/09/2222-01311426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 92805CALIFORNIA ROADSIDE SERVICESHEET INDEX1426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 92805VICINITY MAPNo. Description DatePROJECT SCOPE & INFORMATIONPROJECT SCOPE:CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXISTING TOWING SERVICE / IMPOUND YARD ADDRESS: 1426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 92805LOT SIZE 41,064 SFTOTAL EXISTING BUILDING SF 7,690SFSTORAGE YARD AREA 9,002 SFNUMBER OF STORIESSINGLE STORYZONING1G -INDUSTRIAL GENERAL ZONEOCCUPANCYB, S1APPLICABLE CODESCalifornia Building Code (CBC) 2019California Electrical Code (CEC) 2019California Mechanical Code (CMC) 2019California Plumbing Code (CPC) 2019California Energy Code 2019California Fire Code (CFC) 2019California Green Building Code 2019BUILDING INFORMATION: SCALE1/2" = 1'-0"ACC PRKG SIGN1SCALE1/2" = 1'-0"VAN PRKG SIGN2SCALE1/2" = 1'-0"ISA SYMBOL3SCALE1/2" = 1'-0"PRIVATE PROPERTY SIGN4SCALE3" = 1'-0"CONCRETE WHEEL STOP6SCALE1/4" = 1'-0"CROSSWALK STRIPING5CSCOVER SHEETA-1.1EXISTING SITE PLANA-1.2PROPOSED SITE PLANATTACHMENT NO. 2 1PLPLPL172.76'40.00'85.50'90.00'81.33'1 6 0 .0 0 '203.82'6' - 6"13' - 0"18' - 0"GATE16' - 0"GATE16' - 0"21' - 0"EXISTING STORAGE BUILDING OCCUPANCY - S13200 SF / 300 = 10.67 OCCUPANTSEXISTING STORAGE BUILDINGOCCUPANCY - S12080 SF / 300 = 7 OCCUPANTS41' - 6"37' - 0"37' - 0"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"8' - 2"3' - 0"80' - 0"21' - 5"26' - 5"47' - 10"83' - 0"72' - 1"66' - 4"(E) OFFICE OCCUPANCY - B1,470 SF / 150 = 10OCCUPANTS40' - 0"PLPLPLPL860' - 0"11' - 4"5' - 0"18' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"6' - 11"ROLLING GATE22' - 0"ROLLING GATE20' - 0"GATE24' - 0"24' - 0"(E) DRIVEWAYTO S. ALLEC ST.(E) OFFICE550 SF / 1504 OCCUPANTS55' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"20' - 5"6' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 6"10' - 0"TOW-TRUCK PARKING AREAEXISTING STORAGE 390 SF2 OCCUPANTSEXISTING COVEREDPARKINGEXISTING STORAGEAREA1578 SFEXISTING STORAGEAREA1578 SFEXISTING STORAGEAREA1260 SFEXISTING PARKINGAREAEXISTING PARKINGAREA1415' - 8"001026003008008TYP009TYPTYPEXISTING COVEREDSTORAGEFIRE ACCESS20' - 0"17' - 6"FIRE ACCESS20' - 0"TYPTYP54' - 3"75' - 8"79' - 0"60' - 8"58' - 0"17' - 6"010030002002PROPERTY LINE4' X 4' ADA PARKING STALLACCESSIBLE EXIT(E) EXISTINGScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberPREPARED BY:VIVIAN TEETER19390 APPLEWOOD CT.LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530(909) 730-9216As indicated6/20/2022 6:17:49 PMA-1.1EXISTINGSITE PLANCALIFORNIA ROADSIDE SERVICECheckerV. TEETER05/09/2222-01311426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 92805SCALE1/16" = 1'-0"EXISTING SITE PLAN1No. Description Date001 (E) DOUBLE DETECTOR AND BACK FLOW PREVENTOR002 (E) ASPHALT PAVING003 (E) CMU FENCE WALL008 (E) PLANTER & LANDSCAPING009 (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ SLATS010 (E) STANDARD 8'6" X 18' PARKING SPACES, PER CITY STANDARD 470026 (E) GATE KEYPAD030 TRASH DUMPSTERKEY NOTESSITE LEGEND PLPLPL172.76'40.00'85.50'90.00'81.33'1 6 0 .0 0 '203.82'6' - 6"13' - 0"18' - 0"GATE16' - 0"GATE16' - 0"21' - 0"41' - 6"37' - 0"37' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"3' - 0"80' - 0"21' - 5"28' - 8"50' - 0"83' - 0"69' - 11"64' - 1"40' - 0"PLPLPLPL62' - 2"11' - 4"5' - 0"18' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"6' - 11"ROLLING GATE22' - 0"GATE24' - 0"24' - 0"(E) DRIVEWAYTO S. ALLEC ST.55' - 0"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"8' - 6"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"12' - 0"18' - 1"18' - 0"24' - 6"10' - 0"29' - 10"37' - 2"(E) WAREHOUSESTORAGE 3200 SF(E) WAREHOUSESTORAGE 2080 SF(E) OFFICE OCCUPANCY - B1,470 SF / 150 = 10OCCUPANTS(E) OFFICE550 SF / 1504 OCCUPANTSTOW-TRUCK PARKING AREA3,708 SFEXISTING STORAGE 390 SFEXISTING COVEREDPARKINGEXISTING STORAGEAREA1578 SFEXISTING STORAGEAREA1578 SFEXISTING STORAGEAREA1260 SFEXISTING COVEREDSTORAGE001026008008TYPTYP17' - 6"010030009TYPFIRE ACCESS20' - 0"17' - 6"FIRE ACCESS20' - 0"TYP58' - 0"00200258' - 0"75' - 8"59' - 10"ROLLING GATE20' - 0"79' - 0"0031391142018' - 0"5' - 0"6 0 .0 0 °20' - 0"20' - 0"035040035040035042035040GATE TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURSGATE TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURS8' - 6"PROPERTY LINE4' X 4' ADA PARKING STALLACCESSIBLE EXIT(E) EXISTINGScaleDateDrawn ByChecked ByProject NumberPREPARED BY:VIVIAN TEETER19390 APPLEWOOD CT.LAKE ELSINORE, CA 92530(909) 730-9216As indicated6/20/2022 6:17:49 PMA-1.2PROPOSEDSITE PLANCALIFORNIA ROADSIDE SERVICECheckerAuthor05/09/2222-01311426 S. ALLEC ST.ANAHEIM, CA 92805No. Description DatePARKING REQUIREMENTS:4 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF BUILDING GFA0.4 SPACES PER 1,000 SF OF GFA OF OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREABUILDING 2,020 SFOFFICE SPACE = 2,020 / 1,000 = 2.02 x 4 = 8 SPACESWAREHOUSE/STORAGE SPACE 5,670 SFWAREHOUSE SPACE = 5,670 / 1000 = 5.67 X 1.5 = 8 SPACESEQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA = 4,416 / 1,000 = 4.4 X 0.4 = 2 SPACES18STALLS REQUIRED20PROVIDEDCBC TABLE 11B-208.2 1 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED LEGENDSCALE1/16" = 1'-0"PROPOSED SITE PLAN1001 (E) DOUBLE DETECTOR AND BACK FLOW PREVENTOR002 (E) ASPHALT PAVING003 (E) CMU FENCE WALL008 (E) PLANTER & LANDSCAPING009 (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ SLATS010 (E) STANDARD 8'6" X 18' PARKING SPACES, PER CITY STANDARD 470026 (E) GATE KEYPAD030 TRASH DUMPSTER035 (N) STANDARD 8'6" X 18' PARKING SPACES, PER CITY STANDARD 470040 (N) CONCRETE WHEEL STOPS PER DETAIL 6/C042 (N) 9'X 18' ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND SIGNAGE, CBC SECTION 11B-502.6.4 ANDSTRIPING PER CITY STANDARD 470KEY NOTES DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net California Roadside Services 1426 Allec Street Letter of Operations and Parking Justification Letter California Roadside Services California Roadside Services provides towing services to AAA, the California Highway Patrol, and local law enforcement. The company’s operation center at 1426 Allec Street consists of the manager’s office, a maintenance building for the company’s tow trucks and equipment, and a temporary storage building for vehicles that have been involved in crimes, potential crimes or at the request of law enforcement. California Roadside Services does not tow vehicles from private property, unless requested to do so by law enforcement. Most vehicles towed by their trucks go directly to area repair shops, or, in some instances, directly to vehicle recycling centers. California Roadside Services- Operations: Number of Employees: Total of 20 employees, at most 10 are on site Monday through Friday and fewer than 10 on Saturday. Hours of Operation: Open to the Public: 8am to 5pm Monday through Friday. Office Staff: 8am to 5 pm Monday through Friday Tow truck operators and other off-site services: 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. (This is almost exclusively AAA services for battery and other vehicle related issues) Company Vehicles: Tow Trucks: 14, Service trucks: 10 There are generally 4 to 5 total trucks at any time on-site during the day. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net Parking: Parking is provided for the general public, office workers and others in the area adjacent to the office. Parking for non-office employees, tow trucks and service vehicles is in the work area adjacent to the shop and storage building. The special parking section for the tow trucks and service vehicles is located behind the gates. These gates are open during business hours but are closed, except for service vehicles entering and exiting, after the end of the business day. Ingress-Egress to the site: There is only one entry/exit. Other Items of Interest: All Vehicle Load and Uploading is done on site. No off-loading of vehicles occurs on neighboring property or parking lots. Number of Customers/Public coming to the site each day: 1 per day. (This number might seem low, but California Roadside Services is primarily a AAA vendor. As such, AAA customers are serviced off site and the customer either receives a jump, battery replacement or their vehicle is towed to a repair shop. The only members of the public visiting the site would be there to retrieve their personal belongings from an impounded vehicle. As it relates to some of these visits, law enforcement may be required to be on-site once a week. A traffic survey, conducted from May 3, 2022, through May 7, 2022 is attached. DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net California Roadside Services 1426 Allec Street Traffic Survey A Traffic Survey was conducted by the on-site manager of California Roadside Services from Tuesday May 3, 2022 through Saturday, May 7, 2022. Methodology: Each vehicle entering the property from 8:00am until 5:00pm was counted on the census form provided at the end of this report. Vehicles were divided into five categories: Customers/General Public Office Staff Mechanical Staff Tow Trucks (all types) Others (primarily drivers) In order to show the need for tow truck parking, tow trucks were counted coming in and going out of the parking lot. Results were tabulated, and an average daily traffic flow was created. This was achieved by dividing the total vehicles, by the number of days in the survey (5). The tabulations, averaging, and the census worksheets are attached. Results: The average number of vehicles per day were: Customers/General Public: 0.2 Office Staff: 2.2 Mechanical Staff: 5 Tow Trucks (all types): 7.4 Others: 4.6 DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net Conclusions: The survey demonstrated that the average total number of non-service vehicles per day requiring parking was 12. The average total number for the tow trucks and service vehicles was 7.4. The actual parking provided is 20 for non-service vehicles, plus 10 spaces for the service vehicles, for a total of 30 spaces. The proposed provided parking exceeds the daily requirements and will not impact any neighboring facilities. DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net CENSUS SUMMARY 1426 S. Allec Street Traffic Survey Total Vehicles by Type Date Customers Office Staff Mechanical Staff Others Total non -service Tow Trucks In Tow Trucks Out Tuesday May 3, 2022 1 3 5 5 14 9 15 Wednesday May 4, 2022 0 3 5 3 11 10 12 Thursday May 5, 2022 0 2 5 2 9 8 11 Friday May 6, 2022 0 3 5 11 19 6 11 Saturday, May 7, 2022 0 0 5 2 7 4 1 Total 5 Days 1 11 25 23 60 37 50 Average 5 Days 0.2 2.2 5 4.6 12 7.4 10 DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net CENSUS WORK SHEETS DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net DeSnoo & DeSnoo Arts, Letters & Politics Since 1982 PO Box 11426 Santa Ana, California 92711 Telephone (714) 921-1181 Fax line (714)921-1186 E-mail desnooanddesnoo@sbcglobal.net # S LEWIS STE CERRITOS AVES ALLEC STE S SALVATION PLE. BALL RD S. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVES.ANAHEI MBLVDS. STATE COLLEGE BLVDS.SUNKISTSTW. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE E. KATELLA AVE W. DI S N E Y W A Y S . M A N C H E S T E R A V E 1426 South Allec Street DEV No. 2022-00022 Subject Property APN: 082-542-40 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 I DEV 2022-00022 EIR 81 INDUSTRIAL I ICE RINK I INDUSTRIAL I RAILROAD I SALVATION ARMY I AUTO DEALERSHIP I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I CITY OF ANAHEIM ELEC. SUBSTATION I INDUSTRIAL I ICE RINK I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL S LEWIS STE CERRITOS AVES ALLEC STE S SALVATION PLE. BALL RD S. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVES.ANAHEI MBLVDS. STATE COLLEGE BLVDS.SUNKISTSTW. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE E. KATELLA AVE W. DISNEY WAY S . MA N C H E S T E R A V E 1 4 2 6 S o u t h A ll e c S t r e e t D EV N o . 2 0 2 2 -0 0 0 2 2 Subject Property APN: 082-542-40 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JULY 6, 2022 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00017 LOCATION: 2951 West Ball Road, Units 200 & 210 (Terminus Escape Room) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Terminus Escape Room, represented by William Shaw and the property owner is Bens Equity LLC. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to permit an indoor entertainment facility, known as an “escape room”, within two existing commercial tenant spaces. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that a Class 1 – Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15301 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request; and adopt the attached resolution approving Development Permit No. 2022-00017. BACKGROUND: This 2.29-acre property is developed with one multi-tenant commercial building and is part of a larger commercial complex known as “East-West Shopping Center”. The property is located in the Neighborhood Commercial (N-C) Development Area of the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan “SP 2017-01”. The General Plan designation for the property is Neighborhood Center Commercial (C-NC) which encourages a diverse blend of commercial land uses. Surrounding land uses include retail uses to the south across Ball Road, a carwash and service station to the west, single-family residential to the east, and multi-family residential to the north. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to permit a 3,500-square foot indoor entertainment facility, known as the Terminus Escape Room. The operation of the escape room will be located in two existing suites, both on the second floor of the commercial building. The facility will include two escape rooms, two rooms for virtual reality stations, a reception lobby, and Boba counter. No changes to the exterior of the building are proposed. Development Permit No. 2022-00017 July 6, 2022 Page 2 of 4 The Terminus Escape Room experience is a combination of different interactive activities. A virtual reality component with be created into eight separate stations, one customer per station, which will use specialized equipment to play first-person or role-playing video games. The tenant will also provide two escape rooms. The escape room component is an interactive gaming facility where participants use communication, team building, and problem solving to decipher puzzles and clues to “escape” a room before time runs out. The facility includes a “set” consisting of rooms and doorways created for an immersive customer experience. The Terminus Escape Room would offer two unique experiences, each entertaining a group of 2-10 people. Escape rooms are typically used by groups and for team building exercises. Every room would be equipped with security cameras, emergency exits, and two-way communication between customers and employees. Terminus will also have a small counter where customers can order Boba drinks and teas. This counter is intended solely for patrons and would not operate as a separate business operation. The virtual reality stations will require patrons to arrive 15 minutes before the appointment time for briefing and equipment set up. Guests will be designated to one station each with a headset that staff will set up properly to begin the game. Guests can choose between 30, 60, or 120-minute intervals for the virtual reality games. The escape room experiences would take approximately 60 minutes. There is a 15-minute reset time for players to debrief in the lobby area, take pictures, and exit the facility, while the next group of participants is informed of the safety rules. The hours of operation for the business would be from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. seven days a week and would be operated by 2-4 employees at any given time. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Development Permit No. 2022-00017 July 6, 2022 Page 3 of 4 A conditional use permit is required to permit indoor recreation facilities in this zone in order to determine compatibility with the surrounding area. Staff believes that the use would be compatible with other businesses in the surrounding area because entertainment activities would occur entirely within the commercial units and adequate parking for the use would be provided as described in the parking analysis below. Furthermore, the peak operating hours would occur after normal business hours for the shopping center. With the conditions imposed, such as restricting the operation to those outlined in the attached Letter of Request (Attachment No. 2) and limiting the sessions to 10 participants each, the establishment of this use would not impact the operations of other nearby commercial businesses or be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Parking: Due to the different types of indoor recreation, the Code does not identify a parking ratio for this use. Instead, a parking demand study is required to determine the demand for the use. The applicant submitted a letter of operation, which details the number of escape rooms, virtual reality space, and the Boba counter. There would be a maximum of 40 guests at any time, with four employees. Two other escape rooms have been permitted in the city and a parking demand study was conducted for each of these businesses. The previous demand studies determined that on average the vehicle occupancy is two guests per vehicle and one vehicle per employee. Based on these studies and the applicant’s letter, the peak parking demand for this use would be 24 parking spaces. The peak parking demand for the indoor entertainment use is in the evening and on weekends, which is during the off-peak hours of the other office and retail uses within the commercial center. There are 163 parking spaces in the commercial center and the remaining uses require 97 spaces. The combined demand for the commercial center and the Terminus Escape Room would be 121 spaces, which leaves a surplus of 42 parking spaces. Based on the applicant’s letter of operation and staff’s analysis of previously approved escape room locations, staff believes the 24 parking spaces required for the escape room is appropriate and that the 163 parking spaces provided would accommodate all of the businesses in the commercial center. Environmental Impact Analysis: The Project qualifies for a Class 1 – Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Sections 21000-21189.57) as set forth in Sections 15301 and 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000- 15387). Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is within an existing multi-tenant commercial building and is part of a larger commercial complex. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and as further described in this staff report, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the conditions exist for Planning Commission to make the required findings to approve this request. The proposed indoor recreation facility is compatible with the on-site retail, office, and restaurant uses in the surrounding area. The number of parking spaces provided is adequate to accommodate the indoor recreation facility and the existing uses in the commercial center. Staff recommends approval of this request. Development Permit No. 2022-00017 July 6, 2022 Page 4 of 4 Prepared by, Submitted by, Ivan Orozco Scott Koehm Associate Planner Principal Planner, AICP Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Applicant’s Letter of Request 3. Project Plans 4. Aerial and Vicinity Maps [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2018-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022- 00017 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2022-00017) (2951 WEST BALL ROAD, SUITES 200 AND 210) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Development Application No. 2022- 00017 to permit a commercial indoor recreation facility known as the Terminus Escape Room, (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") for premises located at 2951 West Ball Road, Suites 200 and 210 in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.29 acres in size and is currently developed with one multi-tenant commercial building. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Neighborhood Center Commercial (C-NC) land uses. The Property is located in the Neighborhood Commercial (N-C) Development Area of the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan “SP 2017-01”. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.122 (Beach Boulevard Specific Plan No. 2017-1) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the General Plan designation for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Development Application No. 2022-00017, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Class 1 consists of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use - 2 - PC2022-*** beyond that existing at the time of this determination. The proposed project is within an existing multi-tenant commercial building and is part of a larger commercial complex. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, and as further described in this staff report, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project would be categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Development Application No. 2022-00017, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed request to permit a commercial indoor recreation facility within an existing commercial building is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under the classes of allowable uses set forth in Section No. 18.122.050 of the Code. 2. The proposed conditional use permit to permit a commercial indoor recreation facility, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the building is surrounded by compatible buildings and uses; and, the commercial indoor recreation facility would be located within an existing building with no adverse effects to adjoining land uses. 3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the commercial indoor recreation facility in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the facility would be located within an existing commercial building that is surrounded by other commercial uses. 4. The traffic generated by the commercial indoor recreation facility will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets and adequate parking will be provided to accommodate the use. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land use will continue to be integrated with the surrounding commercial area and would not pose a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 3 - PC2022-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Development Permit No. 2022-00017, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the property under Development Permit No. 2022-00017 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2022-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on July 6, 2022, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of July, 2022. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2018-*** - 6 - PC2022-*** EXHIBIT “B” DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 2022-00017 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the business owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement Division 2 The operator of the business shall not permit, and shall take all steps necessary, to prevent its patrons from consuming alcoholic beverages on the premises. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 The entertainment use shall take place indoors. There shall be no outdoor storage of game props or materials. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Request submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in that document shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 5 Escape room game session shall have a cumulative maximum of 20 participants at any time (2 rooms at maximum with 10 participants each). Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 6 The applicant will obtain all required Building Permits, inspections, and approvals prior to any occupancy. This includes but is not limited to any changes to the floor plan, construction of any walls, installation of any locks or locked doors that would impede egress at any time, installation or removal of any electrical items, and other alterations to the site. The applicant will allow the Building Division to perform periodic, on-the-spot inspections throughout the use to ensure that no unpermitted alterations have been performed. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Building Division - 7 - PC2022-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 7 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 8 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees, and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees, and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim, or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 9 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 10 The Subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Letter of Request and Operation City of Anaheim: To whom it may concern, This letter of request is for a city permit and business license to operate a family friendly entertainment business in the city of Anaheim at 2951 W Ball Rd, Anaheim. This location is close enough to local theme parks to offer more entertainment options in this city so they don’t travel elsewhere. There are few virtual reality gaming offerings in Orange County and we would like to offer a premier offering specializing in Escape Rooms. In addition we would like to create one physical escape room for visitors to challenge themselves as well. I love to travel and experience new games and adventures. For the many experiences I have tried we know we can create an experience people from afar will travel to give it a try. We will focus on local and tourism for growth of our business. Looking forward to this opportunity to start our future in Anaheim. Property Details Property size: 2.29 acres Current Land Use: Retail Current Zoning: Beach Boulevard Specific Plan (SP 2017-1), Neighborhood Commercial Applicant Name: William Wynn Shaw Project: Terminus Escape VR Location: 2951 W Ball Rd Suite #200 - #210, Anaheim, Ca 92804 Project Proposal: The Premises shall be used for virtual reality gaming & Escape Room, business office and administrative uses, as permitted by law. Background: My name is William Shaw and I would like to open a Virtual Reality Lounge & Escape Room that offers non-alcoholic beverages for its patrons. I have worked in the hospitality industry all my life since I was a dishwasher working my way up to department head level operating multi-outlet revenue food and beverage operations. What it has taugh t me is that with a vision, strong image, clean look and excellent customer service you can bring light to everyone’s lives through entertainment with stellar service. My most recent project was at King’s Eye Escape room located in Westminster down the road as builder and operator it ATTACHMENT NO. 2 opened up a whole new world of family friendly fun for customers, my staff and my family. Building the two escape rooms & axe throwing lounge inspired me to bring more offerings to those visitors. Love seeing the excitement, reaction and smiling faces that leave after every experience they try out. This will be a clean, family friendly entertainment environment that will keep visitors coming back. Operations (Terminus Entertainment): This will be open to the public as a gaming and software design office. Patrons will be invited by reservation only to come experience a pay to play offering of various entertainment activities. These include First Person Shooters, Role Playing Games, Escape Rooms, Challenges, Team Building that is focused on corporate bookings which also allows transient guests to experience the offerings. Guests will make a reservation online, arrive 15 minutes before their reservation to check in with an associate. They will be provided with the necessary equipment to be able to experience the activity they have chosen and be provided an introduction. Guests will be designated one at each station and will have one headset to put over their heads. This allows them to teleport virtually into another world. They can choose 30 minutes, 60 minutes or 120-minute intervals for their experience and then leave the premises. Other services include a Café to unwind, relax, wait their turn and/or watch their friends and family on the big screen inside the game. There will be a video feed what they look like inside these experiences. We will also offer merchandise such as T-shirts, Coffee cups, hats, stickers with our brand to allow patrons a choice to remember and take a piece of their experience at our establishment home with them to enjoy. This is located inside the Virtual Reality lounge in suite #200. The Escape room also at this location will allow 2-10 players to play a 60 minute room solving a series of puzzles to gather keys to open containers to find more clues to get to the next puzzle. Players have 60 minutes to get as far as they can or Escape the game and leave the rooms. This is an adventure family friendly game great for all ages , skill levels and creates stronger family & team bonding. Services we will offer:  Soft Drinks, tea, water, soda, boba milk tea, coffee, energy drinks and more non - alcoholic beverages.  Merchandise for sale such as T-shirts, hats, stickers, coffee cups, VR accessories and more.  Virtual Reality Escape Room experiences  Virtual Reality gaming and educational experiences  Birthday Parties, corporate events, team building  Two escape rooms with family friendly adventure puzzle rooms  Gift cards and players card for repeat customers How many groups will be in attendance per session or appointment? This location will open in phases as it builds out. An escape room does not pop up overnight as some have taken 3 months up to 4 years to build various levels of immersion and quality. We plan to take 6 months for each Escape Room minimum to build and only plan on building two at this location. Please see below phases of opening and attendance per group. Phase #1: Opening Summer/Fall 2022  8x Virtual Reality Stations with one guest at each station. Maximum 8x players per hour.  14x sit down guests maximum per hour in café. Phase #2: Fall/Winter 2022  8x Virtual Reality Stations with one guest at each station. Maximum 8x players per hour.  14x guests maximum per hour in café.  *NEW* one Escape Room located in Suite #210. Occupancy 2-10 people. Phase #3: Spring/Summer 2023  8x Virtual Reality Stations with one guest at each station. Maximum 8x players per hour.  14x guests maximum per hour in café.  One Escape Room located in Suite #210. Occupancy 2-10 people.  *NEW* one Escape Room located in back of suite 200. Occupancy 2-10 people. Details on Occupancy Levels/Employee levels after all phases are complete:  Minimum/Maximum Occupancy per hour – Number of Employees on shift  6 customers minimum / 42 customer maximum / 2 staff minimum / 4 staff maximum o Boba Café – 1/14 customer per hour / 1 staff min/2 staff max per hour o Virtual Reality Stations – 1/8 customer per hour / 1x staff minimum & maximum o Escape Room #1 – 2/10 customer per hour / 1x staff minimum & maximum o Escape Room #2 – 2/10 customer per hour / 1x staff minimum & maximum Please describe the schedule of appointments and whether the appointment times have been adjusted depending on the demand for the escape room hours. There are only a certain number of openings available per hour, depending on the staffing levels. At this location we will have two staff members running two escape rooms a 1:1 ratio so there is support and control of each game. Each escape room start time is staggered as there is an orientation for rules & safety of the game, a waiver is signed by each guest that decides to play the game. How to open locks, enter and exit doors, ask for help, location of restrooms. This process takes 10-15 minutes including story introduction to explain their objectives for the game they are about to play. The next group comes in 15 minutes later so the groups do not run into each other for a easy efficient flow. Once the reservation ends, 5-10 minutes is spent with the group to go over questions, take pictures and say goodbye. Game is re-set, cleaned and ready for next group. An example of a booking schedule runs likes this below: SLOT #1 – Escape Room #1 – 12noon SLOT #2 – Escape Room #2 – 12:30pm SLOT #3 – Escape Room #1 – 1:30pm SLOT #4 – Escape Room #2 – 2:00pm Operations (Local Example): A. Location selected is at Mission Escape Room – Anaheim a. 400 Disney Way #313, Anaheim, Ca 92802 B. Hours of Operations: a. Monday – 11:30am – 11pm b. Tuesday – 11:30am – 11pm c. Wednesday – 11:30am – 11pm d. Thursday – 11:30am – 11pm e. Friday – 11:30am – 11pm f. Saturday – 10am – 11pm g. Sunday – 10am – 11pm C. Peak hour parking demands based on services provided a. b. D. Schedule of appointments and whether the appointments times have been adjusted depending on the demand for the escape room hours. a. There are only a certain number of slots available per hour, depending on the staffing levels, if 2 of 4 rooms are booked. Typically the other two available slots are automatically blocked by the system to prevent over-booking. If the location is fully staffed, they could run 2-10 people in each room. In this location they only have 4x total games. At maximum capacity they would have 40 people per 1.5 hours. Average booking numbers would typically be four players per game which would average 24 players per hour. E. Size of groups and services provided. a. This location only offers escape room experiences and it is reservation based booking system comparable to Terminus Entertainment system. Walk-In’s are only accepted on availability. # of Employees:  1x manager(myself), 6x associates. Hours of Operations:  Monday – 11am – 11pm  Tuesday – 11am – 11pm  Wednesday – 11am – 11pm  Thursday – 11am – 11pm  Friday – 11am – 11pm  Saturday – 11am – 11pm  Sunday – 11am - 11pm Property Tenant List: 1. 2951 (1st Floor) Unit #100 – Southwestern National Bank 2. 2951 (2nd Floor) Unit #200 & #210 (2nd floor) – Terminus Escape VR (approval pending) 3. 2951 (2nd Floor) Unit #230 – Vacant 4. 2951 (2nd Floor) Unit #250 – Office - Ammar Professional Services 5. 2947-2949 – Restaurant – Al Tannour (Mediterranean Food restaurant) 6. 2955 – Restaurant – Saivam Café (Vegan food Restaurant) 7. 2945 – Retail – Premium Barbers 8. 2943 – Retail - Tobacco’s Best 9. 2941 – Restaurant – AM Thai Fusion Cuisine 10. 2939 – Retail - Asahi Beauty Salon 11. 2937 – Restaurant – Teddy’s Red Tacos 12. 2935 – Vacant 13. 2929-33 – Office - Access (Extended School operated by OC School District) A. Indicate how the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. This unit is located on the 2nd floor with no outside space for employees or customers. The parking lot already built and currently in use will not be expanded as it is large enough for an average of 12 customers, 4x employees per hour that would occupy this unit. It will not adversely affect the future development of the adjoining areas as a parking lot separates adjoining areas that is already in place. B. Explain how the site proposed for the use is large enough to accommodate anticipated growth of the development and allow the continued operation without causing a detriment to the particular area or to health and safety. The 4,512 sq ft provided is being designed to fit up to 12 guests and 2 employees maximum at a given time. We will be opening with only 6 guests per hour with 2 employees and have enough space to grow up to 42 guests and 6x employees in the future. The remaining space on the 2nd floor of this building also is rentable for expansion of this enterprise. So, there would be no new construction if expanding is needed. When it is time to expand no new construction will be needed as well. C. Indicate how the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the roads designed and constructed to handle the traffic in the area. The space on the 1st floor used to be a Hookah lounge and was approved by the city for its use and traffic flow with numerous guests at various times. Now Southwestern Bank in established in this location with a dramatic decreased in traffic flow. This enterprise will add a maximum of 20 guests per hour to the already established parking spaces available. This unit will also have 10x dedicated parking spaces for its patrons that visit its establishment. D. Indicate how approval of this Conditional Use Permit or Minor Conditional Use per any conditions of approval, will not harm the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The approval of this Minor Conditional Use Permit will add happiness and enjoyment of all ages to residents and visitors to the city of Anaheim. This will be a safe, friendly and fun place to go on adventures in this great city. Proposed TerminusVR EscapeBARBERVACANTFirst FloorBank(4,807 SQ.FT.)On Ground Floorof 2 Story Office Building1,813PROJECT #ISSUE DESCRIPTIONDATESCALESHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEDRAW BYREVISIONS:ISSUES:1Scale132"-1'0"A1.0Site PlanN.XScale: 1/32"-1'0"Site Plan1April 27th, 2022132" - 1'0"1310AM - 7PM2951 #200 - 210 (2nd Floor)4452424ATTACHMENT NO. 3 117'-10"63'-11"25'-3"19'-10"18'-10"20'-11"5'-5"38'-1"36'-10"8'-5"8'-2" 105'-10" 12'-7"14'-1"25'-3"31'-2"7'-8"7'-5"7'-10"63'-11"23'-3"17'-10"22'-11"PROJECT # ISSUE DESCRIPTION DATE SCALE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE DRAW BY REVISIONS: ISSUES: 1scale 116"-1'0" Terminus Proposed Floor PlanA1 Terminus Proposed Floor Plan NICHOLE XA April 28, 2022 116"- 1'0"1 A2 CITY STAMP DESIGN FIRM Scale: 1/16"-1'0" Terminus Proposed Floorplan1 Key A B A B C D E G K J I F H Waiting Lounge Reception Desk C E Virtual Reality Lounge #1 Boba Corner/Kitchen F Employee Powder Room D Virtual Reality Lounge #2 I J Unisex Restroom Male Restroom Female Bathroom Escape Room #1 N.I.C N.I.C G Escape Room #2 H Electrical Room K L L G G L L W BALL RDS BEACH BLVDS BEACH BLVDS GAYMONT STW LYNROSE DR W ELMLAWN DR W RAVENSWOOD DR W LYNROSE DR W. B A L L R D W. O R A N G E A V E S. DALE AVE. CERRITOS AVE S. MAGNOLIA AVES. WESTERN AVES. BEACH BLVD2951 West Ball Road DEV No. 2022-00017 Subject Property APN: 126-261-30 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 N-C DEV 2022-00017 RETAIL RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-2 CONDOS 9 DU N-C CAR WASHN-C SERVICE STATION T RELIGIOUS USE N-C RELIGIOUS USE R-M COBBLESTONE APARTMENTS 30 DU R-M TRAVEL INN MOTEL R-M SHADOW PARK INN & SUITES RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R-M RAINBOW INN R-M ANAHEIM LODGE R-M SAHARA MOTEL R-M ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER R-M ROBIN HOOD MOTEL MU- M RETAIL N-C RETAIL N-C RETAIL N-C PICK YOUR PART AUTO RECYCLER N-C RETAIL N-C TRAILS END MOBILEHOME PARK N-C RETAIL RM-4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N-C RETAIL N-C RETAIL R-M LYNROSE MANOR APARTMENTS 72 DU R-M LYNROSE MANOR APARTMENTS 72 DU RM-4 FRENCH COUNTRY APARTMENTS 33 DU R-M COBBLESTONE APARTMENTS 34 DU RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N-C RETAIL R-M LYNROSE MANOR APARTMENTS 72 DU MU- M APARTMENTS 49 DU W BALL RDS BEACH BLVDS BEACH BLVDS GAYMONT STW LYNROSE DR W ELMLAWN DR W RAVENSWOOD DR W LYNROSE DR W ELMLAWN DR W. BALL RD W. ORANGE AVE S. DALE AVE. CERRITOS AVE S. MAGNOLIA AVES. WESTERN AVES. BEACH BLVD2 9 5 1 Wes t B a ll Road D EV N o . 2 0 2 2 -0 0 0 1 7 Subject Property APN: 126-261-30 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2021