Item No. 3 - DEV2021-00180 Lincoln Sunkist Townhomes
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2022
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2021-00180
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
LOCATION: This property is located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and
Sunkist Street (2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue).
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is KB Home, represented by
John Abboud. The property owner is Albert & Sons Real Estate I, LLC., represented
by Tracy Muller. The agent is Sagecrest Planning+Environmental represented by
Laurel Reimer.
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following entitlements:
1) A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow the construction of an 83-unit,
attached single-family residential project with modified development
standards (Attachment 1);
2) A Tentative Tract Map (TTM No. 19237) to permit a 1-lot 83-unit subdivision
for condominium purposes (Attachment 2).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions,
determining that streamlined review pursuant to Section 15183.3 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines is the appropriate environmental
documentation for the proposed project, and approving the Conditional Use Permit
and Tentative Tract Map No. 19237.
BACKGROUND: This 4-acre property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial
and Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zones and is developed with two multi-
tenant office buildings. The site is designated for Medium Density land uses by the
General Plan. Single-family residential land uses are adjacent to the property to the
south and across Lincoln Avenue to the north, commercial uses including a service
station and car wash are located to the east across Sunkist Street, and multi-family
residential uses are adjacent to the west.
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 2 of 7
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit and a tentative tract
map to construct 83 single-family attached townhomes (Residential Planned Unit Development)
with modifications of development standards. The units would be divided throughout 10 buildings
on the site with three of the buildings fronting Lincoln Avenue, one building facing Sunkist Street,
and the remaining six spread out throughout the property. The project includes five floor plans
consisting of two, three, and four-bedrooms. Depending on the placement, design, and orientation
of the townhome, the front door would either face a common courtyard, pedestrian walkway, or
public street. The street-facing units are designed with a stooped entrance that would lead to the
front door or a private patio area.
The project site would provide two vehicular access points from private drives that connect to
Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. The Lincoln Avenue driveway is located adjacent to the west
property line. The second driveway is located near the southeast corner of the property. All units
would include an attached two-car garage, and surface parking spaces would be provided along
the south and east property lines. The units would contain between 1,415 and 1,834 square feet of
living area. A total of 238 parking spaces would be provided for the project.
Site Plan
The common courts or alleyways have been designed to provide enhanced landscaping throughout
the development. The main entrance to each of the units would also provide small planters that
help soften the hardscape and create a formal entryway. A wide pathway is provided from each
unit to the project’s pathways and sidewalks for safe and attractive pedestrian access. Four of the
five common courts feature multi-colored pavement in a wave design to provide an extension of
common open space areas. While this area is not counted towards the recreation-leisure area, the
enhanced common courts provide over 10,000 square feet of additional area for residents to use.
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 3 of 7
Plan Type Number of Units Square Footage Bedrooms/Bathrooms
Plan 1 34 1,415 2/2.5
Plan 2 14 1,460 3/2.5
Plan 3 10 1,800 3/3.5
Plan 4 8 1,761 4/3.5
Plan 5 17 1,834 4/3.5
Plan Type Matrix
The project would feature attractive and enhanced architectural elements including façade
articulation, height variation, contrasting colors and materials, and dense landscaping in the
setback and pedestrian access areas. The color palette would include a mix of whites, greys, and
beiges, with red and brown accents. The first story would include stucco with stone veneer accents.
Townhomes with second-story decks would have contrasting metal railings.
Typical Elevation
Lincoln Avenue Elevation
Recreational-Leisure Area: The project exceeds the required amount of recreation-leisure space
with 24,852 square feet including 15,627 square feet of common recreation-leisure area. Based on
the unit count and a minimum of 275 square feet per unit, a total of 22,285 square feet is required.
The common area amenities would include a tot lot, community barbeques, seating areas, a dog
park, and a community garden. Private areas would include decks and ground floor patios at some
of the units.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each
requested entitlement action:
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 4 of 7
General Plan Housing Element: The Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan is the guide for
the City’s future development. It designates the distribution and location of specific land uses and
establishes the permitted densities for each land use designation.
The General Plan designation of the project site Medium Density, and the zoning designation is
C-G with a Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone. The purpose of the Residential
Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone is to provide “by-right” housing development opportunities
consistent with a property’s residential General Plan land use designation. This Overlay Zone is
intended to be applied to properties that are currently zoned and/or developed with non-residential
uses, but designated for multiple-family residential uses by the City’s General Plan. The Overlay
Zone is further intended to serve as an implementation tool of the City’s Housing Element of the
General Plan by facilitating residential development on identified “housing opportunity sites.”
This property is currently developed with commercial office uses, is designated in the General
Plan for Medium Density Residential land uses, and qualifies for residential development under
the RO Overlay Zone.
Conditional Use Permit: The development of residential uses through implementation of the RO
Overlay Zone must be in accordance with the uses and requirements set forth in the Zoning Code
for Multiple-Family Residential Zones. Specifically, the project would be subject to the “RM-3.5”
Multiple-Family Residential Zone requirements. Residential Planned Unit Developments of
single-family attached units require a conditional use permit in the RM-3.5 Zone. Before the
Planning Commission may recommend approval of the conditional use permit for the Residential
Planned Unit Development, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that
all of the following conditions exist:
1) The uses within the project are compatible;
2) New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass, bulk,
and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area, provided the existing
buildings conform with the provisions of this title;
3) Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate;
4) The project is consistent with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City;
5) The size and shape of the site proposed for the use are adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area;
6) The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets
and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area;
7) The project complies with the General Plan and any applicable zoning or specific plan; and
8) The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City
of Anaheim.
Modification of Development Standards: Setbacks for projects in the RM-3.5 Zone may be
modified in conjunction with a conditional use permit when it is determined that the modifications
achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. The
applicant requests to modify the minimum required setbacks between buildings to permit a 15-foot
distance where the Zoning Code requires a 40-foot separation between three-story buildings with
parallel walls that are designated as “primary” walls. Primary walls are building walls that contain
an entrance and/or windows opening into living areas. The proposed project would provide
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 5 of 7
reduced building-to-building setbacks of 15 feet at the narrowest point. The three-story primary
building elevations would be separated by enhanced landscaped paseos and area landscape and
would have adequate separation to ensure a quality living environment. The elevations would
provide off-setting window locations for the upper floors while the first floor would have a solid
wall where the garage and entry areas are located. The proposed modification would help achieve
a functional, pedestrian-friendly design and provide for a high-quality living environment. This
building-to-building setback request applies to the separation between Building E and Building F
on the Lincoln Avenue Street frontage.
Elevation Building E Window Placement
The applicant is also requesting a 10-foot setback from ground floor patios where 20 feet would
be required. The 10-foot encroachment into the required setback would allow for semi-private
access to the front door of the units, thereby separating the units from the public sidewalk along
Sunkist Street, while still maintaining adequate street connectivity, which would add to the
livability and privacy of the proposed residences. Furthermore, staff believes this design would
allow for a higher level of design around the grade difference that currently exists along the Sunkist
frontage to the interior lot area.
Staff believes that the findings can be met to approve the Residential Planned Unit Development.
The use of the project site includes only single-family attached residences designed in a manner
that the buildings are compatible with each other. The project is compatible with the scale, mass,
bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area as the project has been designed
so that the buildings are setback from the adjacent residential uses and buffered with landscaping,
parking spaces, and drive aisles. The project includes adequate vehicle and pedestrian access, is
consistent with the design guidelines, and the property is of a size that is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area. Traffic
generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and the project
complies with the General Plan and the RO Overlay Zone. Staff believes that the granting of the
conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and recommends that the Planning
Commission approve this request.
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 6 of 7
Parking Requirements: The Municipal Code requires 237 parking spaces for the proposed project.
The project has been designed to exceed the required number of parking spaces with 166 spaces
located in garages and 72 surface spaces for a total of 238 parking spaces.
Tentative Tract Map: Before the Planning Commission may recommend approval of the tentative
tract map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following
conditions exist:
1) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, including its design and
improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more
particularly with the "Medium Density Residential" land use designation.
2) That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract
Map No. 19237, including their design and improvements, is consistent with the
zoning and development standards of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential
Zone, with the exception of the reduced building-to-building setback and street
setback being proposed in conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit.
3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed Project.
4) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on the proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 19237, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental
habitat has been identified.
5) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on the proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 19237, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health
problems.
6) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map No.
19237, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision.
A tentative tract map is proposed to create a 1-lot condominium subdivision for the 83 “airspace”
condominium units. All common areas, including driveways, recreational areas, paseos, and
sidewalks would be owned and maintained by the homeowner’s association. The proposed density
of 20.75 dwelling units per acre is permitted under the Medium Density Residential land use
designation, which allows up to 36 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the project does not conflict
with easements acquired by the public and complies with all subdivision requirements. Therefore,
staff recommends approval of the tentative tract map request.
Community Outreach: The applicant hosted a community outreach meeting on October 18, 2022,
from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Abraham Lincoln Elementary School. Additionally, the
applicant also attended the District 5 Community Meeting on October 19, 2022, at the Anaheim
United Methodist Church. The applicant provided a summary of each meeting, included as
Attachment 6.
Environmental Impact Analysis: A streamlined environmental review checklist was prepared
pursuant to Section 15183.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines to determine
Development Application No. 2021-00180
December 5, 2022
Page 7 of 7
whether the proposed project would have any significant effects that the City, as Lead Agency, did
not previously disclose in Environmental Impact Report Nos. 330 and 346 pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21094.5. No new mitigation measures are being recommended to the
Planning Commission as a result of this project. Several existing mitigation measures do apply to
this project and are reflected in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 385, included with the checklist
and reflected in the recommended conditions of approval. With implementation of these measures,
and uniformly applicable development policies or standards, the project will not cause any new or
more significant effects than previously disclosed by Environmental Impact Report Nos. 330 and
346 and no additional environmental review is required.
CONCLUSION: Staff has carefully considered the proposed project and believes that it is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and is designed in a manner that will provide a quality
living environment for its future residents and the surrounding community. In addition, the proposed
project meets the goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing
opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs, would provide housing in furtherance of
the City’s Housing Element through the implementation of the Residential Opportunity (RO)
Overlay Zone which is consistent with the City Council’s policy that identifies additional sites
throughout the property for housing development opportunities.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Ivan Orozco Scott Koehm, AICP
Associate Planner Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Draft Tentative Tract Map Resolution
3. Infill Streamlining Checklist
4. Project Description
5. Project Plans
6. Applicant Community Outreach Summary
7. Aerial and Vicinity Maps
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2022-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2021-00180)
(2420-2450 EAST LINCOLN AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction
of an 83-unit attached, single-family residential project with modified development standards, i.e.,
a reduction in the street landscape setback and building-to-building setback requirements of the
"RM-3.5" Multiple-Family Residential Zone, for that certain real property generally located at the
southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street and commonly referred to as 2420-2450
East Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally
depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the
"Property"); and
WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is proposed in conjunction with a tentative tract
map to permit a 1-lot, 83 unit attached single-family residential subdivision of the Property for
condominium purposes, which is designated as "Tentative Tract Map No. 19237", and
Development Permit No. 2021-00180. A Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Tract Map No. 19237,
and Development Permit No. 2021-00180 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed
Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 4.0 acres in size and is currently developed with
two commercial office buildings. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates
the Property for Medium Density residential land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G”
General Commercial zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapters 18.34
(Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone) and 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of
the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent with the
General Plan designation for the Property; and
WHEREAS, single-family, attached dwelling developments within the RM-3.5 (Multiple-
Family Residential) zone are subject to the approval of a conditional use permit by the Planning
Commission pursuant to Table 6-A of Section 18.06.030 (Uses). Pursuant to subsection .030 of
Section 18.06.160 (Residential Planned Unit Development), the minimum setbacks set forth in
Section .090 of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) may be modified in order to
achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and compatibility with surrounding uses. If
approved, the Conditional Use Permit will permit the reduction in building-to-building setbacks
and street landscape setback; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the
- 2 - PC2022-***
City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for
the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, in May 2004, the City Council certified the General Plan and Zoning Code
Update Program EIR No. 330 (EIR 330), which evaluated impacts associated with implementation
of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update and created a Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 122 to mitigate those impacts. The Property was designated for Low-Medium
Density Residential land use as a part of the update; and
WHEREAS, in September 2013, the City Council certified Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report No. 346 (SEIR 346) for the Anaheim Housing Opportunities Site Rezoning. The
City approved Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A as part of SEIR 346. SEIR 346
supplemented EIR 330 in the areas of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and
transportation and traffic. The Rezoning implemented a key strategy of the City’s 2006-2014
General Plan Housing Element by rezoning the properties identified as Housing Opportunities
Sites in the Housing Element. The proposed rezoning of these approximately 166 sites allowed
“by-right” housing development at these locations by applying one of two overlay zones to these
properties: the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone or the Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone.
The Property was reclassified to the “RO” Overlay Zone as a part of the Rezoning Project; and
WHEREAS, a streamlined review checklist was prepared pursuant to Section 15183.3 of
the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines to determine whether the project would have
any significant effects that the City, as Lead Agency, did not previously disclose in Environmental
Impact Report Nos. 330 and 346 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21094.5; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures
from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A that are specific to the Proposed Project mitigation
measures are reflected in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 385 (herein referred to as "MMP 385").
A complete copy of the Infill Streamlining Checklist including Appendices and MMP 385 is on
file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on December 5, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code,
to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate
and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, after examining the Infill Streamlining Checklist, and pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures, this Planning
Commission finds and determines and that with implementation of MMP 385 and uniformly
applicable development policies and standards, the Proposed Project will not cause any new
specific effects or more significant effects and no additional environmental review is required; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection .050 (Findings) of Section 18.06.160 (Residential
Planned Unit Development), this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection,
investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said hearing, including the plans submitted by the applicant, does hereby
find and determine the following facts with respect to the conditional use permit:
- 3 - PC2022-***
1. The uses within the project are compatible with the surrounding land uses.
2. New buildings or structures related to the project are compatible with the scale, mass,
bulk, and orientation of existing buildings in the surrounding area. The surrounding buildings
include single-family and multi-family residential. The proposed three-story buildings will have a
maximum height of 39’-6” and be setback 55’ from the adjacent single-family zone and 37’ from
the adjacent multiple-family zone. The placement of 83 new dwelling units will be compatible
with the surrounding residential structures and with neighborhood-scale businesses.
3. Vehicular and pedestrian access are adequate because the project entry has been
designed in accordance with City standards. Additionally, a 24-foot-wide drive aisle will encircle
the project and provide garage access for 42 units. Five 20-foot wide alleyways will provide garage
access for 41 units. An accessible path of travel will provide connectivity to all community
amenities and both public streets. The project is designed to adjust the existing sidewalks away
from the street, provide a new landscaped parkway, and provide stooped entries to contribute to
the pedestrian orientation of the area, encourage walkability, and promote community interaction.
4. The Project is consistent with any adopted design guidelines applicable to the Property
because the project will consist of 10 buildings and five product types with two architectural styles.
The project incorporates a variety of rooflines, wall articulation, porches, balconies, window
treatments, and varied colors and building materials on all elevations. The buildings will have a
maximum height of 39’-6” and be set back 55’ from the adjacent single-family residential zone
and 47’ from the adjacent multiple-family residential zone. Common open space amenities will
include a tot lot, community barbeques, seating area, dog park, and community garden. Private
open space amenities will include balconies and patios.
5. The size and shape of the site proposed for the Project is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area because the
project property has a gross lot size of 4.0-acres, which would allow for up to 144 dwelling units
under the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay. The proposed project provides 83 larger family
dwelling units and meets the parking requirements. With the exception of building setbacks, the
development will comply with all other development standards of the RM-3.5 zone.
6. The traffic generated by the project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets
and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because, in addition to the
studies done under EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346, a trip generation memo was prepared for the
project, reviewed, and approved by the City’s Public Works Department. The trip generation
memo demonstrated that the proposed project will not exceed the thresholds to require a Traffic
Impact Study. Projects that are below the threshold are not considered to create generate vehicle
traffic that would impact the local roadways. Additionally, the site is zoned General Commercial
but will be developed with a residential use, which has a lower traffic generation rate than
commercial uses.
7. The Project will comply with the General Plan and zoning for the property because the
site is zoned for General Commercial land uses but has a General Plan Land Use designation of
Medium Density Residential with the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone. Both the RO
Overlay Zone and State law relieves applicants from rezoning property when the General Plan
allows the density proposed. Housing can be built “by-right” provided the project meets the site
- 4 - PC2022-***
development standards of the RM-3.5 Zone. Alternatively, Section 18.06.160 Residential Planned
Unit Development of the Code allows developers to apply for a conditional use permit to modify
development standards from the applicable zone.
8. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the project will
provide 83 new townhomes towards much-needed family housing, the majority of which will have
three or four bedrooms that can accommodate larger families. The high-quality development will
provide an attractive attached single-family community for Anaheim residents with well-designed
common and private open space amenities. The project is compatible with the existing surrounding
uses and careful consideration was given to the landscaping and pedestrian activities. The project
will not generate hazardous materials, noise or pollution. Approval of the conditional use permit
will not harm the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares
that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all
evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, as the "lead agency" under CEQA, the
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed
Project, the Infill Streamlining Checklist, EIR 330, SEIR 346, and the evidence received to date,
does determine as follows:
1. That the Infill Streamlining Checklist was prepared in compliance with the
requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA Procedures .
2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis
included in the Infill Streamlining Checklist, no additional environmental review is required as the
Proposed Project will not cause any new specific effects or more significant effects, or uniformly
applicable development policies and standards will substantially mitigate such effects;
specifically:
(a) There have not been any substantial changes in any of the entitlements that were
analyzed in EIR 330 and SEIR 346 that require major revisions of EIR 330 or SEIR 346
because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects;
(b) There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of EIR 330 and SEIR
346 due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
- 5 - PC2022-***
(c) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could
not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time EIR 330 and
SEIR 346 were certified as complete and adopted, that shows any of the following:
(i) The Proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in
EIR 330 and SEIR 346;
(ii) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in EIR 330 and SEIR 346;
(iii) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would
in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the Proposed Project, but the proponents of the Proposed Project decline to adopt
the mitigation measures or alternatives; or
(iv) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in EIR 330 and SEIR 346 would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the proponents of the Proposed Project
decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the Planning
Commission determines that EIR 330 and SEIR 346, together with the Infill Streamlining
Checklist, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed
Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has reviewed and
considered MMP 385, which was prepared for the Proposed Project and reflects mitigation
measures from EIR 330 and SEIR 346 that are specific to the Proposed Project, and, in accordance
with the requirements of CEQA, finds and determines that, with the imposition of identified
mitigation measures and uniformly applicable development policies and standards, the Proposed
Project will not cause any new specific effects or more significant effects .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings and Section
18.06.160.010 of the Code, this Planning Commission does hereby approve this conditional use
permit, contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption of a resolution approving Tentative Tract
Map No. 19237, which entitlements are now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set forth in
MMP 385, and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibits B and C attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with
conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause
provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the
condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated
significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
- 6 - PC2022-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval)
and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 5, 2022. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
PC2022-***
PC2022-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(DEV2021-00180)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
WITHIN 30 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
1 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention
assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property,
behind the property line and building setback in accordance with the
Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division
requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT
2 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property
owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to
establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system
plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and
related technical drawings and specifications.
Public Utilities, Electrical
Engineering
3 Prior to the connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall
provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities Easement with
dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan.
Public Utilities, Electrical
Engineering
4 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall
submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical
Engineering
5 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for
Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in
determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to
the project.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
6 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints,
pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls,
erosion control, slope easements and other pertinent information in
accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California
Building Code, latest edition.
Public Works,
Development Services
7 Prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including
supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim
for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend
changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying
off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-
out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall
identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and
sizes of catchments and system connection points and all
downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited
to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities.
Public Works,
Development Services
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
8 The developer shall execute a Save Harmless Agreement with the
City of Anaheim for any storm drain connections to a City storm
drain system. The agreement shall be recorded by the applicant on
the property prior to the issuance of any permits.
Public Works,
Development Services
9 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a Registered
Professional Engineer in State of California.
Public Works,
Development Services
10 The OWNER shall obtain the required coverage under California’s
General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent
(NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a
copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) number.
Public Works,
Development Services
11 Submit Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for
review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the
requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/
Significant Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of
pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the
proposed project that could affect the quality of the stormwater
runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and
Treatment Control (if applicable) best management practices
(BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the
surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address
the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined
BMPs. Submit three (3) copies and a plan checking deposit to the
Public Works/Development Services for consideration and
approval.
Public Works,
Development Services
12 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development
Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include
any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP.
Public Works,
Development Services
13 At the time of grading plan submittal, a Fire Master Plan (Fire access
plan) shall be submitted by the owner/developer to Anaheim Fire &
Rescue for review.
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
14 The owner/developer shall ensure the following: During
construction, construction contractors shall comply with South
Coast Air Quality Management District’s (South Coast AQMD’s)
Rules 402 and 403 to minimize construction emissions of dust
particulates. South Coast AQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
emissions of dust and particulates. South Coast AQMD Rule 402
requires that air pollutant emissions not be a nuisance off site. Rule
402 prohibits the discharge from any source whatsoever such
quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury,
detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of
persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose,
health, or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause,
or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or
property.
SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with
Best Available Control Measures so that the presence of such dust
does not remain visible beyond the property line of the emission
source. This rule is intended to reduce PM10 emissions from any
transportation, handling, construction, or storage activity that has
the potential to generate fugitive dust. This requirement shall be
included as notes on the contractor specifications. Table 1 of Rule
403 lists the Best Available Control Measures that are applicable to
all construction projects. The measures include, but are not limited
to, the following:
a. Portions of a construction site to remain inactive longer than
a period of three months will be seeded and watered until
grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized.
b. All on-site roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered
periodically or chemically stabilized.
c. All material transported off site will be either sufficiently
watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of
dust.
d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earthmoving, or
excavation operations will be minimized at all times.
Where vehicles leave a construction site and enter adjacent public
streets, the streets will be swept daily or washed down at the end of
the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved surface.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
15 A private water system with separate water service for fire
protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans
submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
16 Per California Water Code, Division 1, Chapter 8, Article 5, Section
537-537.5) as amended by Senate Bill 7, water submetering shall be
furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water
submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the
ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and
recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project.
17 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of
the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public
streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a
vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large
water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the
Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a
manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said
information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by
Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
18 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of
existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be
coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of
the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
19 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current
Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or
fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if
continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no
longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the
costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
20 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of
Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water
meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement
around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20)
foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals
all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The
easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the
Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The
easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be
responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other
than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete,
bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or
landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or
replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair,
replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other
than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and
included and recorded in the Master CC&Rs for the project.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
21 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities
Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the
maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water
demands for the project. This information will be used to determine
the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required
to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1
of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations.
22 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required
for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule
18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
23 The existing 8-inch backflow prevention device on the fire service
serving the property is substandard and must be replaced per Public
Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
24 That prior to the issuance of a building permit, street improvement
plans shall be submitted showing R6-1(R) (ONE-WAY) sign on the
median directly in front of project driveway for review and approval.
Sign shall be installed prior to the first building and zoning
inspection.
Public Works, Traffic
Engineering
25 That the project driveway on Lincoln Avenue shall be a right-turn
in/out only driveway. That prior to the issuance of a building permit,
plans shall be submitted showing R3-5(R) (RIGHT-TURN-ONLY)
sign and right-turn arrow pavement legend at the project driveway.
Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in
conformance with said plans.
Public Works, Traffic
Engineering
26 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit
draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are
prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by
the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will
generally provide for the following:
• A requirement that residents shall use designated parking
area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles.
• A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection by
the Association or City of Anaheim staff.
• A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the
CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City Engineer,
Planning Director or designee, and shall be approved by the
City Attorney prior to the amendment being valid.
• A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the
CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to enforce
any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to common area
and utility maintenance, Water Quality Management Plan,
and internal parking.
Public Works, Traffic
Engineering
27 The owner/developer shall record Tract Map No. 19237 pursuant to
the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Code.
Provide a duplicate photo Mylar of the recorded map to the City
Engineer's office.
Public Works,
Development Services
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
28 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying
that the building pad has been completed in accordance with the City
of Anaheim Municipal Code. Submit a pad compaction report
prepared by the project's Geotechnical-Soil Engineer of Record.
Public Works,
Development Services
29 Design per City Standards full improvements for all impacted public
streets/facilities in accordance with City Code, Standards and
Specifications. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited
to the following: Curb widening, new curb and gutter, new curb
return at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street,
traffic signal relocation and modification, new commercial
driveway approaches, new sidewalk, landscape parkway with
irrigation and relocation of existing utility boxes and appurtenances.
Public Works, Development
Services
30 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the
Development Services Division for all work performed in the public
right-of-way.
Public Works,
Development Services
31 The owner/developer shall ensure that all California Building Code
and California Fire Code requirements are followed for permit
issuance. Any fire permits which include fire sprinklers, fire alarm,
etc. shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire Department.
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
32 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention
assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property,
behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public
Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
33 Prior to Final Building and Zoning Inspections, the owner/developer
shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an
unsubordinated declaration of Covenants Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the City
Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which restricts the
installation of vehicle gates across the project driveways or access
roads as the site design does not allow any such gates to conform to
City of Anaheim Engineering Standard Detail 475 pertaining to gate
set back distance, turnaround area, guest phone, separate lane for
guest access, and minimum width for ingress/egress as required by
the Fire Department. Should gates be desired in the future, an
amendment to the CC&Rs approved by the City Engineer, Planning
Director and the City Attorney's office shall be recorded. Gates, if
any, shall comply with the current version of City of Anaheim
Engineering Standard Detail 475 and are subject to approval by the
City Engineer.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
34 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, fire lanes shall be
posted by the owner/developer with “No Parking Any Time.” Said
information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for
building permits.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
35 If fire hydrants for proposed project are private hydrants serving this
site, the owner/developer shall submit CC&Rs to Anaheim Fire &
rescue for review and approval covering the private fire hydrants (if
applicable).
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
36 All public improvements shall be constructed by the
owner/developer, inspected and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final building and zoning inspection.
Public Works,
Development Services
37 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department
must be paid in full by the owner/developer.
Public Works,
Development Services
38 The owner/developer shall set all Monuments in accordance with
the final map and submit all centerline ties to Public Works
Department. Any monuments damaged as a result of construction
shall be reset to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Public Works,
Development Services
39 Record Drawings and As-Built Plans shall be submitted by the
owner/developer for review and approval to the Department of
Public Works, Development Services Division.
Public Works,
Development Services
40 The owner/developer shall ensure that each individual residence or
unit is clearly marked with its appropriate number and address.
These shall be positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular
and pedestrian pathways throughout the complex. Main building
numbers shall be a minimum height of 12” and illuminated during
the hours of darkness.
Address numbers shall be positioned to be readily readable from the
street. Numbers shall be illuminated during hours of darkness.
Police Department
41 The owner/developer shall ensure:
• All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.,
deadbolt locks.
• The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and
deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the
inside doorknob/lever/turn piece.
• Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device shall be
designed into all dwelling-unit front doors and all solid doors
where exterior visibility is compromised.
Police Department
42 The owner/developer shall ensure:
• Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during
hours of darkness.
• Adequate lighting of parking lots and associated carports,
circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds
Police Department
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
contiguous to residences shall be provided with lighting of
sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make
clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the
premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe,
secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles
on-site.
GENERAL
43 The design of the on-site private sewer system shall be submitted
to the Anaheim Building Division for review, approval, permit
issuance and inspection in accordance with the Building Code and
Plumbing Code requirements.
Public Works, Development
Services
44 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-
way, public utility easement or City easement area including but
not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete,
walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes
damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City
owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said
special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded
Master CC&Rs for the project and the City easement deeds.
Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
45 A minimum of two connections to public water mains and water
looping inside the project are required. Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
46 The following minimum horizontal clearances shall be
maintained between proposed water main and other facilities:
• 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside
wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals
• 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities,
including storm drains, gas, and electric
• 6-feet minimum separation from curb face
• 10-feet minimum separation from structures, footings,
and trees.
The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all
new and existing public water facilities (e.g., water mains, fire
hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow
devices, etc.):
• 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater
BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees.
• 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all
other utilities (e.g., storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or
above ground facilities.
Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
47 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed
in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
48 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or
parking lots. Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
49 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL
listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator
Register, no equals.
Public Utilities, Water
Engineering
50 Townhouses shall require NFPA 13D fire sprinkler systems. Any
change in type of R occupancy shall require an additional analysis
for fire protection system(s).
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
51 All drivable surfaces - Permanent, temporary, and phased
emergency access roads shall be designed and maintained to
support an imposed load of 78,000 lbs. and surfaced to provide all-
weather driving capabilities.
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
52 An adequate water supply capable of providing minimum fire flow
requirements for fire hydrants and a fire sprinkler system shall be
available for the future, proposed condominiums.
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
53 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” signs shall be posted by the
owner/developer at the entrances of parking areas and located in
other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall
size, with white background and black 2” lettering.
All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs
per 22658(a) C.V.C. to assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owner’s/manager’s request.
Police Department
54 The owner/developer shall ensure:
• Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to
maximize observation while providing the desired degree
of aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged
along fence and property lines and under vulnerable
windows.
• Trees shall not be planted close enough to the structure to
allow easy access to the roof or should be kept trimmed to
make climbing difficult.
Police Department
55 Residential buildings/units shall be pre-wired by the
owner/developer for the future installation of an alarm system. Police Department
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
56 All open parking areas shall maintain a minimum recommended
lighting level of 0.5 foot-candles, measured at the parking surface,
with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 15:1.
Police Department
57 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit
draft Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) that are
prepared by an authorized professional for review and approval by
the City Engineer, Planning Director, and City Attorney, which will
generally provide for the following:
1. A requirement that residents shall use designated parking
area, including garages, only for the parking of vehicles.
2. A provision that parking garages are subject to inspection
by the Association or City of Anaheim staff.
3. A provision requiring that proposed amendments to the
CC&Rs shall be submitted for review to the City
Engineer, Planning Director or designee, and shall be
approved by the City Attorney prior to the amendment
being valid.
4. A provision that the City is a third-party beneficiary to the
CC&Rs and has the right, but not the obligation, to
enforce any of the provisions of the CC&Rs relative to
common area and utility maintenance, Water Quality
Management Plan, and internal parking.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
58 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant, which plans are on file with the Planning Department,
and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
59 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter
18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code
and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced
in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged,
diseased, and/or dead.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
60 The owner/applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days
of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of
building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to
pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required
permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this
application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
61 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any
and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees
to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the
Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts
or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other
costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection
with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
62 The property owner/developer shall be responsible for compliance
with and any direct costs associated with the monitoring and
reporting of all mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation
Monitoring Plan (MMP) No. 385, established by the City of
Anaheim as required by Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources
Code to ensure implementation of those identified mitigation
measures within the timeframes identified in the measure.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
PC2022-***
EXHIBIT “C”
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Terms and Definitions: 1. Property Owner/Developer – Owner or developer of KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes project. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Division, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed "environmental equivalent/timing" and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission or City Council. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be done by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Implementation Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsible Monitoring Party – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit – For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building.
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Air Quality
MM 5.2-1: Prior to the issuance of grading
permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall
include a note on all grading plans, which
requires the construction contractor to
implement following measures during grading.
These measures shall also be discussed at the
pre-grade conference.
• Use low emission mobile construction
equipment.
• Maintain construction equipment
engines by keeping them tuned.
• Use low sulfur fuel for stationary
construction equipment.
• Utilize existing power sources (i.e.,
power poles) when feasible.
• Configure construction parking to
minimize traffic interference.
• Minimize obstruction of through-traffic
lanes. When feasible, construction
should be planned so that lane closures
on existing streets are kept to a
minimum.
• Schedule construction operations
affecting traffic for off-peak hours.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division, Traffic and
Transportation Division
Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
• Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic
flow interference from construction
activities (the plan may include advance
public notice of routing, use of public
transportation and satellite parking
areas with a shuttle service).
Biological Resources
MM 5.3-3: If construction activity is timed to
occur during the nesting season (typically
between March 1 and July 1), developers will be
required to provide focused surveys for nesting
birds pursuant to California Department of Fish
and Game requirements. Such surveys shall
identify avoidance measures taken to protect
active nests.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading Plan Check
Biological Resources MM 5.3-4: Removal of non-native trees shall be
permitted only outside the nesting season.
Ongoing during
construction
activities
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Construction Site
Inspection
Hydrology and Water
Quality
MM 5.7-3: Prior to issuance of the grading
permit, the City shall require that new
developments and/or significant
redevelopments prepare a Final Water Quality
Management Plan to be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer and conform to the City’s
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) related requirements to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Public Services
MM 5.11-1: Future projects will be reviewed by
the City of Anaheim on an individual basis and
will be required to comply with requirements in
effect at the time building permits are issued
(i.e., impact fees, etc.) or if an initial study is
prepared and the City determines the impacts
to be significant, then the project will be
required to comply with appropriate mitigation
measures (i.e., fire station sites, etc.).
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division; Fire
Department; Police
Department
Building Plan Check
Transportation
MM 5.15-5: Prior to issuance of each building
permit, appropriate Transportation Impact and
Improvement Fees shall be paid by the property
owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in
amounts determined by the City Council
Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of
the building permit with credit given for City-
authorized improvements provided by the
Property Owner/Developer; and participate in
all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Public Works
Department/Traffic and
Transportation Division;
Planning
Department/Building
Division
Building Plan Check
Transportation
MM 5.15-6: Prior to approval of the first final
subdivision map or issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first, and subject to
nexus requirements, the property
owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for
dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements,
the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown in the
Circulation Element of the Anaheim General
Plan adjacent to their property.
Prior to
approval of the
first final
subdivision
map or issuance
of the first
building permit,
whichever
occurs first.
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading and/or
Subdivision Map Plan
Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Transportation
MM 5.15-8: The General Plan Circulation
Element and associated Planned Roadway
Network Map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan),
identifies those roadways that are planned to
accommodate current development and future
growth established by the Land Use Element.
Roadways will be constructed as development
occurs and as funding becomes available. In
addition to the roadways identified on the
Planned Roadway Network Map, the
improvements identified in Table 5.4-7 will be
necessary to maintain acceptable levels of
service within the anticipated theoretical
buildout identified in the General Plan.
Ongoing
Public Works
Department/Traffic and
Transportation Division;
Planning
Department/Zoning
Division, Advanced
Planning Division
Ongoing Project
Management
Tribal Cultural
Resources
MM 5.4-3 All archaeological resources shall be
subject to the provisions of CEQA (Public
Resources Code) Section 21083.2.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading Plan Check
Utilities and Service
Systems
MM 5.13-1: Prior to issuance of building
permits, future projects shall demonstrate
compliance with the following water
conservation measures to the satisfaction of the
Anaheim Public Utilities Department:
• Install a separate irrigation meter when
the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500
square feet. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such
as drip irrigation systems and automatic
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Building Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
systems that include moisture sensors.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures)
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in the
irrigation system. (City of Anaheim
Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of water-conservation landscape
plant materials, wherever feasible. (City
of Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures)
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and
equipment including low flush toilets
and urinals. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of cooling tower and waterway
recirculation systems. (City of Anaheim
Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of water efficient ice machines,
dishwashers, clothes washers, and
other water using appliances. (City of
Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures).
Existing Policies and Procedures
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-1: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with all provisions of Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 13.12 related to tree preservation.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, Federal Endangered Species Act, the
California Endangered Species Act, and the
Central/Coastal Subregion (NCCP/HCP) for
protection of Federal or State listed species.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-3: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with Section 1601-1603 of the Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Geology and Soils
PPP Geo-1: All grading operations will be
conducted in conformance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code, Title 17 – Land Development
and Resources.
During
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works Site
Inspection
Geology and Soils
PPP Geo-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall
submit for approval to the State Water
Resources Control Board, a Notice of Intent to
be covered under the Storm Water Permit, in
compliance with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.
In addition, future projects shall be required to
develop and implement a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which
incorporates Best Management Practices
(BMPs).
During project
permitting
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading and Building
Plan Check
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
PPP Haz-1: The Proposed Project shall comply
with all relevant local, State, and federal
regulations related to hazardous materials.
Ongoing
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works and
Building Site
Inspection and Plan
Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
PPP Haz-2: Prior to structural
demolition/renovation activities, a Certified
Environmental Professional shall confirm the
presence or absence of asbestos containing
materials (ACMs). Should ACMs be present,
demolition materials containing ACMs shall be
removed and disposed of at an appropriate
permitted facility. Asbestos removal shall be
performed by a State certified asbestos
containment contractor in accordance with the
South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rule 1403.
Prior to site
demolition
activities
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Hydrology and Water
Quality
PPP HYD-1: The Property Owner/Developer
shall comply with all applicable local, State, and
federal regulations relating hydrology and water
quality. During
permitting and
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works and
Building Plan Check
Noise
PPP NOI-1: The following Best Management
Practices, included as Conditions of Approval,
would reduce any noise level increases produced
by the construction equipment to the nearby
noise-sensitive residential land uses:
• Prior to approval of grading plans and/or
issuance of building permits, the Property
Owner/Developer shall include a note on
the plans indicating that noise-generating
Project construction activities shall only
occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. on any day (City of Anaheim
Municipal Code, Section 6.050.010). The
Project construction supervisor shall
Prior to grading
permit issuance
and during
construction
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading and Building
Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
ensure compliance with the permitted
construction hours.
• The Property Owner/Developer shall post
a construction site notice near the
construction site access point or in an
area that is clearly visible to the public.
The notice shall include the following: job
site address; permit number, name, and
phone number of the contractor and
owner; dates and duration of
construction activities; construction hours
allowed; and the City of Anaheim and
construction contractor phone numbers
where noise complaints can be reported
and logged.
• Ongoing during construction, the
Construction Contractors shall do all of
the following:
o All construction equipment
whether fixed or mobile, will be
equipped with properly operating
and maintained mufflers,
consistent with manufacturer
standards.
o All stationary construction
equipment will be placed so that
emitted noise is directed away
from the noise sensitive
receptors nearest the project site.
o As applicable, shut off all
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
equipment when not in use.
o To the degree possible,
equipment staging will be located
in areas that create the greatest
distance between construction-
related noise and vibration
sources, and sensitive receptors
surrounding the project site.
o Jackhammers, pneumatic
equipment, and all other portable
stationary noise sources will be
directed away and shielded from
existing residences in the vicinity
of the project site. Either one-
inch plywood or sound blankets
can be utilized for this purpose.
They should reach up from the
ground and block the line of sight
between equipment and existing
residences. The shielding should
be without holes and cracks.
o No amplified music and/or voice
will be allowed on the project
site.
o Haul truck deliveries will not
occur outside of the hours
presented as exempt for
construction per City’s Municipal
Code Section 6.70.010.
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Noise
PPP NOI-2: A best management practice limiting
the use of a vibratory roller within 20 feet or a
large bulldozer within 12 feet of the existing
residential structures to the south and west of
the project site will be implemented to avoid
significant impacts.
During
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works Site
Inspection
Public Services
PPP PS-1: The Property Owner/Developer would
pay school impact fees pursuant to Senate Bill
50 (Government Code Section 65995).
During project
permitting
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Recreation
PPP REC-1: Prior to issuance of building permits,
the Property Owners/Developers shall comply
with Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.250,
which requires the provision of parkland and/or
the payment of fees, consistent with the Quimby
Act.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Project Design Features
Noise
PDF NOI-1: Windows and sliding glass doors on
building elevations that will be exposed to
exterior noise levels that exceed 65 dBA CNEL,
will be upgraded to ensure that vehicle noise
does not result in interior noise levels that exceed
45 dBA CNEL inside the residence.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
PC2022-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on December 5, 2022, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of December 2022.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2022-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2022-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 19237 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2021-00180)
(2420-2450 EAST LINCOLN AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the “Planning
Commission”) did receive a verified petition for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 19237
to establish a one-lot subdivision and 83“airspace” condominium lots for that certain real property
generally located on the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street and commonly
referred to as 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 19237 is proposed in conjunction with a
request for a conditional use permit to permit the construction of an 83-unit single-family attached
residential project with modified development standards, i.e., a reduction in the street landscape
setback and building-to-building setback requirements of the "RM-3.5" Multiple-Family
Residential Zone. Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map No. 19237, shall be referred
to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 4.0 acres in size and is currently
developed with two commercial office buildings. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General
Plan designates the Property for Medium Density residential land uses. The Property is located in
the “C-G” General Commercial zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapters
18.34 (Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone) and 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential
Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Proposed Project consistent
with the General Plan designation for the Property, and pursuant to the provisions of the State of
California’s Housing Accountability Act codified in Section 65589.5 of the California
Government Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Sections 15000-15387) (herein
referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead
agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed
Project; and
WHEREAS, in May 2004, the City Council certified the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program EIR No. 330 (EIR 330), which evaluated impacts associated with
implementation of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update and created a Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 122 to mitigate those impacts. The Property was designated for Medium
Density Residential land use as a part of the update; and
- 2 - PC2022-***
WHEREAS, in September 2013, the City Council certified Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report No. 346 (SEIR 346) for the Anaheim Housing Opportunities Site
Rezoning. The City approved Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A as part of SEIR 346. SEIR
346 supplemented EIR 330 in the areas of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and
transportation and traffic. The Rezoning implemented a key strategy of the City’s 2006-2014
General Plan Housing Element by rezoning the properties identified as Housing Opportunities
Sites in the Housing Element. The proposed rezoning of these approximately 166 sites allowed
“by-right” housing development at these locations by applying one of two overlay zones to these
properties: the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone or the Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone.
The Property was reclassified to the “RO” Overlay Zone as a part of the Rezoning Project; and
WHEREAS, a streamlined review checklist was prepared pursuant to Section
15183.3 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines to determine whether the project
would have any significant effects that the City, as Lead Agency, did not previously disclose in
Environmental Impact Report Nos. 330 and 346 pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
21094.5; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation
measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A that are specific to the Proposed Project
mitigation measures are reflected in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 385 (herein referred to as
"MMP 385"). A complete copy of the Infill Streamlining Checklist including Appendices and
MMP 385 is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on December 5, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, after examining the Infill Streamlining Checklist, and pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual,
this Planning Commission finds and determines and that with implementation of MMP 385 and
uniformly applicable development policies and standards, the Proposed Project will not cause any
new specific effects or more significant effects and no additional environmental review is required;
and that; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection,
investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence
and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to approve Tentative Tract Map No.
19237, does find and determine and recommends that the City Council so find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative
Tract Map No. 19237, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General
Plan of the City of Anaheim, and more particularly with the Medium Density land use
designation, because the Proposed Project will consist of a maximum density of 20.75
dwelling units per acre (townhomes) which is permitted under the Medium Density land use
designation, which allows up to 36 dwelling units per acre.
- 3 - PC2022-***
2. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative
Tract Map No. 19237, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning
and development standards of the "RM-3.5" Zone contained in Chapter 18.06 of the Code,
because the project will comply with applicable development standards including the
modified development standards as permitted in Chapter 18.06.160 of the code, for a reduced
building-to-building setback and reduced street setback, now pending.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Proposed
Project.
4. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 19237, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has
been identified, because the previously approved EIR No. 330 and FEIR No. 346 are the
appropriate environmental documentation for the project and that there will be no significant
impacts to the environment as a result of the Proposed Project, furthermore analyzed through
a project-specific initial study checklist.
5. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 19237, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
6. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 19237, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the
public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, as the "lead agency" under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, based upon a thorough review of the
Proposed Project, the Infill Streamlining Checklist, EIR 330, SEIR 346, and the evidence received
to date, does determine as follows:
1. That the Infill Streamlining Checklist was prepared in compliance with the
requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure
Manual;
2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included
in the Infill Streamlining Checklist, no additional environmental review is required as the Proposed
Project will not cause any new specific effects or more significant effects, or uniformly applicable
development policies and standards will substantially mitigate such effects; specifically:
- 4 - PC2022-***
(a) There have not been any substantial changes in any of the entitlements that were
analyzed in EIR 330 and SEIR 346 that require major revisions of EIR 330 or SEIR 346
because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects;
(b) There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under
which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of EIR 330 and SEIR
346 due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
(c) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could
not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time EIR 330 and
SEIR 346 were certified as complete and adopted, that shows any of the following:
(i) The Proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in
EIR 330 and SEIR 346;
(ii) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in EIR 330 and SEIR 346;
(iii) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the Proposed Project, but the proponents of the Proposed Project decline to adopt
the mitigation measures or alternatives; or
(iv) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in EIR 330 and SEIR 346 would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects on the environment, but the proponents of the Proposed Project
decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the Planning
Commission determines that EIR 330 and SEIR 346, together with the Infill Streamlining
Checklist, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed
Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has reviewed and
considered Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 385 ("MMP 385"), which was
prepared for the Proposed Project and reflects mitigation measures from EIR 330 and SEIR 346
that are specific to the Proposed Project, and, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, finds
and determines that, with the imposition of identified mitigation measures and uniformly
applicable development policies and standards, the Proposed Project will not cause any new
specific effects or more significant effects.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing with respect to the request to establish a subdivision for conveyance purposes, does find
and determine the following facts:
- 5 - PC2022-***
1. The proposed subdivision, including its design and improvements, and with the
conditions imposed herein is consistent with the Medium Density Residential land use designation
in the Anaheim General Plan and the development standards contained in the “RM-3.5” Multiple-
Family Residential Zones in that the proposed tract map will create “airspace” lots which do not
grant any future development potential. The proposed lots are consistent with the proposed zoning
and the existing General Plan land use designation.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and size of the proposed subdivision
in that the conveyance map would not grant any future development potential.
3. The design of the subdivision, with the conditions imposed, is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or
their habitat because no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified on the site in that no
environmental impacts are anticipated.
4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems, since any new structures and associated site improvements will be
constructed on the property in compliance with the conditions imposed and other related Code
requirements in that the future demolition, removal of structures, and future development will be
subject to all City code requirements for demolition and construction.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision in that the tract map is conditioned to be submitted for review and approval
to the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Surveyor and then shall be recorded in the Office
of the Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of building permits.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings
and determinations, the Planning Commission does approve Tentative Tract Map No. 19237,
contingent upon and subject to: (1) the adoption of a resolution approving a conditional use
permit, which entitlements are now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set forth in MMP
385, and the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibits B and C attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City
of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s),
(ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
- 6 - PC2022-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of December 5, 2022. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Section 17.08.104 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City
Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
PC2022-***
PC2022-***
EXHIBIT “B”
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
(DEV2021-00180)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL MAP
1 The legal property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the
City of Anaheim, for road, public utilities and other public purposes, the
right-of-way easements along as shown on TTM No.19237 and in locations
listed below:
• Variable width dedication along Lincoln Avenue frontage (4’ to
11’) to achieve the ultimate half street width of 64 feet from street
centerline at the right turn lane and transitioning into 53 feet from
street centerline west of the proposed right turn lane, as shown on
TTM19237.
• A corner cutoff dedication at the southwest corner of Lincoln
Avenue and Sunkist Street.
Public Works,
Development Services
2 The legal property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to
the City of Anaheim public access easements for emergency services and
solid waste/trash collection along the interior private drives/aisles, as
shown on the TTM19237.
Public Works,
Development Services
3
All existing structures in conflict with the future property lines shall be
demolished. The developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the
Building Division prior to any demolition work.
Public Works,
Development Services
4 The vehicular access rights to public streets shall be released and relinquished
to the City of Anaheim, except at approved driveway openings, as shown on
the Tentative Tract Map.
Public Works,
Development Services
5
The owner/developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees
required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Move to prior to building
issuance.
Public Works,
Development Services
6 The Owner/developer shall submit improvement plans and cost estimate for
the construction of required public improvements along the project
frontages Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street to the Public Works
Development Services Division for review, approval, and to determine the
bond amounts. Such improvements shall include, but not be limited to the
following: street widening, new curb and gutter, new curb return at the
intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street, traffic signal relocation
and modification, new commercial driveway approaches, new sidewalk,
new landscape parkway with irrigation, and relocation of existing utility
boxes and appetences.
Public Works,
Development Services
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
7 The final map shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim, Public Works
Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for
technical correctness review and approval.
Public Works,
Development Services
8 The Developer/Owner shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City
of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City
attorney for all private improvements including, but not be limited to the
following: landscape lot, private utilities, drainage devices, parkway
landscaping and irrigation, private drives, common courts, private lights,
common ingress/egress, common facilities, parking areas, etc. In addition
to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management
Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded
concurrently with the Final Map.
Public Works,
Development Services
9 The Developer/Owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit
security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee
construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit
shall be in accordance with City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The
agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map.
Public Works,
Development Services
10 Provide a Monumentation bond in an amount specified in writing by a
Licensed Land Surveyor of Record. Public Works,
Development Services
11 Comply with all applicable requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works,
Development Services
12 The developer shall design all public improvements in accordance with City
standards and specifications. Public street improvements shall meet all City
standards and requirements.
Public Works,
Development Services
13 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant, which
plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
14 The owner/applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for
this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of
the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
15 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its
officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit
or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior
to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of
any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended
to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
PC2022-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including
without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses
incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding.
16 The property owner/developer shall be responsible for compliance with and
any direct costs associated with the monitoring and reporting of all
mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) No.
385, established by the City of Anaheim as required by Section 21081.6 of
the Public Resources Code to ensure implementation of those identified
mitigation measures within the timeframes identified in the measure.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
PC2022-***
EXHIBIT “C”
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Terms and Definitions: 1. Property Owner/Developer – Owner or developer of KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes project. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Division, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed "environmental equivalent/timing" and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission or City Council. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be done by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Implementation Timing – This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsible Monitoring Party – Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit – For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building.
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Air Quality
MM 5.2-1: Prior to the issuance of grading
permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall
include a note on all grading plans, which
requires the construction contractor to
implement following measures during grading.
These measures shall also be discussed at the
pre-grade conference.
• Use low emission mobile construction
equipment.
• Maintain construction equipment
engines by keeping them tuned.
• Use low sulfur fuel for stationary
construction equipment.
• Utilize existing power sources (i.e.,
power poles) when feasible.
• Configure construction parking to
minimize traffic interference.
• Minimize obstruction of through-traffic
lanes. When feasible, construction
should be planned so that lane closures
on existing streets are kept to a
minimum.
• Schedule construction operations
affecting traffic for off-peak hours.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division, Traffic and
Transportation Division
Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
• Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic
flow interference from construction
activities (the plan may include advance
public notice of routing, use of public
transportation and satellite parking
areas with a shuttle service).
Biological Resources
MM 5.3-3: If construction activity is timed to
occur during the nesting season (typically
between March 1 and July 1), developers will be
required to provide focused surveys for nesting
birds pursuant to California Department of Fish
and Game requirements. Such surveys shall
identify avoidance measures taken to protect
active nests.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading Plan Check
Biological Resources MM 5.3-4: Removal of non-native trees shall be
permitted only outside the nesting season.
Ongoing during
construction
activities
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Construction Site
Inspection
Hydrology and Water
Quality
MM 5.7-3: Prior to issuance of the grading
permit, the City shall require that new
developments and/or significant
redevelopments prepare a Final Water Quality
Management Plan to be reviewed and approved
by the City Engineer and conform to the City’s
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) related requirements to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Public Services
MM 5.11-1: Future projects will be reviewed by
the City of Anaheim on an individual basis and
will be required to comply with requirements in
effect at the time building permits are issued
(i.e., impact fees, etc.) or if an initial study is
prepared and the City determines the impacts
to be significant, then the project will be
required to comply with appropriate mitigation
measures (i.e., fire station sites, etc.).
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division; Fire
Department; Police
Department
Building Plan Check
Transportation
MM 5.15-5: Prior to issuance of each building
permit, appropriate Transportation Impact and
Improvement Fees shall be paid by the property
owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in
amounts determined by the City Council
Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of
the building permit with credit given for City-
authorized improvements provided by the
Property Owner/Developer; and participate in
all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Public Works
Department/Traffic and
Transportation Division;
Planning
Department/Building
Division
Building Plan Check
Transportation
MM 5.15-6: Prior to approval of the first final
subdivision map or issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first, and subject to
nexus requirements, the property
owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for
dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements,
the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown in the
Circulation Element of the Anaheim General
Plan adjacent to their property.
Prior to
approval of the
first final
subdivision
map or issuance
of the first
building permit,
whichever
occurs first.
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading and/or
Subdivision Map Plan
Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Transportation
MM 5.15-8: The General Plan Circulation
Element and associated Planned Roadway
Network Map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan),
identifies those roadways that are planned to
accommodate current development and future
growth established by the Land Use Element.
Roadways will be constructed as development
occurs and as funding becomes available. In
addition to the roadways identified on the
Planned Roadway Network Map, the
improvements identified in Table 5.4-7 will be
necessary to maintain acceptable levels of
service within the anticipated theoretical
buildout identified in the General Plan.
Ongoing
Public Works
Department/Traffic and
Transportation Division;
Planning
Department/Zoning
Division, Advanced
Planning Division
Ongoing Project
Management
Tribal Cultural
Resources
MM 5.4-3 All archaeological resources shall be
subject to the provisions of CEQA (Public
Resources Code) Section 21083.2.
Prior to
issuance of a
grading permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading Plan Check
Utilities and Service
Systems
MM 5.13-1: Prior to issuance of building
permits, future projects shall demonstrate
compliance with the following water
conservation measures to the satisfaction of the
Anaheim Public Utilities Department:
• Install a separate irrigation meter when
the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500
square feet. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such
as drip irrigation systems and automatic
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Building Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
systems that include moisture sensors.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures)
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in the
irrigation system. (City of Anaheim
Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of water-conservation landscape
plant materials, wherever feasible. (City
of Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures)
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and
equipment including low flush toilets
and urinals. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of cooling tower and waterway
recirculation systems. (City of Anaheim
Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of water efficient ice machines,
dishwashers, clothes washers, and
other water using appliances. (City of
Anaheim Water Conservation
Measures).
Existing Policies and Procedures
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-1: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with all provisions of Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 13.12 related to tree preservation.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, Federal Endangered Species Act, the
California Endangered Species Act, and the
Central/Coastal Subregion (NCCP/HCP) for
protection of Federal or State listed species.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Biological Resources
PPP Bio-3: The Property Owner/Developer shall
comply with Section 1601-1603 of the Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act.
Ongoing
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Geology and Soils
PPP Geo-1: All grading operations will be
conducted in conformance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code, Title 17 – Land Development
and Resources.
During
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works Site
Inspection
Geology and Soils
PPP Geo-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall
submit for approval to the State Water
Resources Control Board, a Notice of Intent to
be covered under the Storm Water Permit, in
compliance with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program.
In addition, future projects shall be required to
develop and implement a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which
incorporates Best Management Practices
(BMPs).
During project
permitting
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Grading and Building
Plan Check
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
PPP Haz-1: The Proposed Project shall comply
with all relevant local, State, and federal
regulations related to hazardous materials.
Ongoing
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works and
Building Site
Inspection and Plan
Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Hazards and
Hazardous Materials
PPP Haz-2: Prior to structural
demolition/renovation activities, a Certified
Environmental Professional shall confirm the
presence or absence of asbestos containing
materials (ACMs). Should ACMs be present,
demolition materials containing ACMs shall be
removed and disposed of at an appropriate
permitted facility. Asbestos removal shall be
performed by a State certified asbestos
containment contractor in accordance with the
South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) Rule 1403.
Prior to site
demolition
activities
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Hydrology and Water
Quality
PPP HYD-1: The Property Owner/Developer
shall comply with all applicable local, State, and
federal regulations relating hydrology and water
quality. During
permitting and
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works and
Building Plan Check
Noise
PPP NOI-1: The following Best Management
Practices, included as Conditions of Approval,
would reduce any noise level increases produced
by the construction equipment to the nearby
noise-sensitive residential land uses:
• Prior to approval of grading plans and/or
issuance of building permits, the Property
Owner/Developer shall include a note on
the plans indicating that noise-generating
Project construction activities shall only
occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. on any day (City of Anaheim
Municipal Code, Section 6.050.010). The
Project construction supervisor shall
Prior to grading
permit issuance
and during
construction
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Grading and Building
Plan Check
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
ensure compliance with the permitted
construction hours.
• The Property Owner/Developer shall post
a construction site notice near the
construction site access point or in an
area that is clearly visible to the public.
The notice shall include the following: job
site address; permit number, name, and
phone number of the contractor and
owner; dates and duration of
construction activities; construction hours
allowed; and the City of Anaheim and
construction contractor phone numbers
where noise complaints can be reported
and logged.
• Ongoing during construction, the
Construction Contractors shall do all of
the following:
o All construction equipment
whether fixed or mobile, will be
equipped with properly operating
and maintained mufflers,
consistent with manufacturer
standards.
o All stationary construction
equipment will be placed so that
emitted noise is directed away
from the noise sensitive
receptors nearest the project site.
o As applicable, shut off all
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
equipment when not in use.
o To the degree possible,
equipment staging will be located
in areas that create the greatest
distance between construction-
related noise and vibration
sources, and sensitive receptors
surrounding the project site.
o Jackhammers, pneumatic
equipment, and all other portable
stationary noise sources will be
directed away and shielded from
existing residences in the vicinity
of the project site. Either one-
inch plywood or sound blankets
can be utilized for this purpose.
They should reach up from the
ground and block the line of sight
between equipment and existing
residences. The shielding should
be without holes and cracks.
o No amplified music and/or voice
will be allowed on the project
site.
o Haul truck deliveries will not
occur outside of the hours
presented as exempt for
construction per City’s Municipal
Code Section 6.70.010.
KB Homes Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 385
Impact Category Mitigation Measure Implementation
Timing
Responsible Monitoring
Party
Monitoring/Reporting
Method
Noise
PPP NOI-2: A best management practice limiting
the use of a vibratory roller within 20 feet or a
large bulldozer within 12 feet of the existing
residential structures to the south and west of
the project site will be implemented to avoid
significant impacts.
During
construction
Public Works
Department/Engineering
Division; Planning
Department/Building
Division
Public Works Site
Inspection
Public Services
PPP PS-1: The Property Owner/Developer would
pay school impact fees pursuant to Senate Bill
50 (Government Code Section 65995).
During project
permitting
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Recreation
PPP REC-1: Prior to issuance of building permits,
the Property Owners/Developers shall comply
with Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.250,
which requires the provision of parkland and/or
the payment of fees, consistent with the Quimby
Act.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
Project Design Features
Noise
PDF NOI-1: Windows and sliding glass doors on
building elevations that will be exposed to
exterior noise levels that exceed 65 dBA CNEL,
will be upgraded to ensure that vehicle noise
does not result in interior noise levels that exceed
45 dBA CNEL inside the residence.
Prior to
issuance of a
building permit
Planning
Department/Building
Division, Advanced
Planning Division;
Zoning Division
Building Plan Check
PC2022-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Susana Barrios, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on December 5, 2022, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of December 2022.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
APPENDIX N CHECKLIST
Prepared for:
The City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
Contact: Heather Allen, Principal Planner
Applicant:
KB Home
9915 Mira Mesa Boulevard, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92131
Contact: John Abboud
Prepared By:
27128 Paseo Espada, Suite 1524
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(714) 931-9655
Contact: Laurel Reimer, AICP
November 2022
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
This page is intentionally left blank.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Purpose of the Appendix N: Environmental Checklist ............................................................................ 1
1.2 Content and Format of an Appendix N: Environmental Checklist .......................................................... 2
2 PROJECT SETTING .......................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Existing Land Uses and Designation of the Project Site .......................................................................... 3
2.3 Surrounding Land Uses............................................................................................................................ 3
2.4 Environmental Background ..................................................................................................................... 3
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................. 7
3.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................. 7
3.2 Proposed Project ..................................................................................................................................... 7
3.3 Construction and Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 8
4 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS ........................................................................................ 9
5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ........................................................................... 15
5.1 Satisfaction of Appendix M Performance Standards ............................................................................ 17
5.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected: ........................................................................................ 21
5.3 Determination: ...................................................................................................................................... 21
5.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Infill Project ........................................................................... 23
5.4.1 Aesthetics ..............................................................................................................26
5.4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources........................................................................29
5.4.3 Air Quality ..............................................................................................................31
5.4.4 Biological Resources ..............................................................................................39
5.4.5 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................44
5.4.6 Energy....................................................................................................................47
5.4.7 Geology and Soils ...................................................................................................51
5.4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................................56
5.4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ..........................................................................59
5.4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality .................................................................................64
5.4.11 Land Use and Planning ...........................................................................................70
5.4.12 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................72
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
ii
5.4.13 Noise .....................................................................................................................74
5.4.14 Population and Housing .........................................................................................80
5.4.15 Public Services .......................................................................................................82
5.4.16 Recreation .............................................................................................................86
5.4.17 Transportation .......................................................................................................89
5.4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .......................................................................................95
5.4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ..................................................................................98
5.4.20 Wildfire ................................................................................................................ 104
5.4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................................... 106
6 LIST OF PREPARERS ................................................................................................... 109
7 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 109
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 – Regional Vicinity Map .................................................................................................5
Figure 2 – Local Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................6
Figure 3 – Conceptual Site Plan .................................................................................................10
Figure 4 – Typical Building Elevations ........................................................................................11
Figure 5 – Conceptual Landscape Plan .......................................................................................12
Figure 6 – Open Space Plan .......................................................................................................13
Figure 7 – Conceptual Lighting Plan ...........................................................................................14
Figure 8 – Proximity to High Quality Transit Corridor Map.........................................................19
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Proposed Development ................................................................................................7
Table 2 - Construction-Related Regional Pollutant Emissions ....................................................34
Table 3 - Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions ...................................................................35
Table 4 - Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors ..............................................36
Table 5 - Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................57
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
iii
APPENDICES
Appendix A – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact
Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., November 21, 2022.
Appendix B – Results of a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study for the 2420
East Lincoln Avenue Project, APNs 083-731-18 and -19, Orange County, California, Brian F. Smith
and Associates, Inc., rev. November 18, 2022.
Appendix C – Geotechnical Exploration and Due Diligence Study, Proposed Residential
Development at 2420 and 2450 East Lincoln Avenue, City of Anaheim, California, NMG
Geotechnical, Inc., September 3, 2021.
Appendix D – Phase I Environmental Assessment, 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Hillman Consulting, August 31, 2021.
Appendix D-1 – Hazardous Materials Inspection, 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Hillman Consulting, September 1, 2021.
Appendix E – Santa Ana Region Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), 2420
East Lincoln Avenue, October 4, 2022.
Appendix F – Drainage Study for 2420 East Lincoln Avenue Project, Rick Engineering Company,
October 3, 2022.
Appendix G – Sewer Study – 2420-2450 E. Lincoln Avenue, PSOMAS, July 20, 2022.
Appendix H – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Noise Impact Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc.,
November 21, 2022.
Appendix I – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Project Trip Generation Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc.,
August 23, 2022.
Appendix J – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Project Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Assessment,
Ganddini Group, Inc., August 23, 2022.
Appendices available for review at https://www.anaheim.net/876/Environmental-Documents and at
the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
iv
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
Acronyms/Abbreviation Definition
ADT Average Daily Traffic
Applicant KB Home
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ASTs Above ground storage tanks
BMPs Best Management Practices
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CARB California Air Resources Board
CBC California Building Code
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
cfs Cubic feet per second
CGS California Geologic Survey
CHSC California Health and Safety Code
City City of Anaheim
CMP Congestion Management Program
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Value
CO Carbon monoxide
County Orange County
CRPR California Rare Plant Rank
CWA Clean Water Act
dB Decibel
dBA A-weighted decibels
EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Environmental Site Assessment
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program
GHG Greenhouse gas
gpd Gallons per day
HCM Highway Capacity Manual
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
v
Acronyms/Abbreviation Definition
ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization
IS Initial Study
Leq Equivalent sound level
LBP Lead-based paint
LOS Level of service
LSTs Localized Significant Thresholds
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
mgd Million gallons per day
MLD Most likely descendent
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
MSL Mean sea level
MTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NCCP Natural Communities Conservation Plan
NO2 Nitrogen dioxide
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PM2.5 Fine particulate matter
PM10 Respirable particulate matter
ppm Parts per million
PPV Peak particle velocity
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
SLF Sacred Lands File
SO2 Sulfur dioxide
SR-91 State Route 91
SWCRB State Water Resources Control Board
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
TAC Toxic air contaminant
TMDLs Total maximum daily loads
USTs Underground storage tanks
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
V/C Volume-to-capacity
VOC Volatile organic compound
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 1
1 INTRODUCTION
KB Home (Applicant) is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map
from the City of Anaheim (City) for the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of an 83-unit residential townhouse project on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and
155 at 2420 and 2450 E. Lincoln Avenue (Proposed Project).
The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project. The Lead Agency will utilize this
document as evidence that the Proposed Project qualifies for the Infill Streamlining Provisions
provided by Senate Bill 226 (Simitian 2011), which is further described below. This document
utilizes analysis from Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 330 for the 2004 City of Anaheim
General Plan and Zoning Code Update and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No.
346 prepared for the 2014-2021 Housing Opportunity Site Rezoning Project certified by the
Anaheim City Council on September 13, 2013.
1.1 Purpose of the Appendix N: Environmental Checklist
This Appendix N: Infill Environmental Checklist (Appendix N Checklist) has been prepared in
accordance with the following:
• California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Public Resources Code Sections
21000 et seq.).
• California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 (State CEQA Guidelines,
Sections 15000 et seq.), specifically Sections 15060 and 15183.3.
The infill streamlining provisions of CEQA were adopted in compliance with Senate Bill 226
(Simitian 2011) (“SB 226”). SB 226 was developed by the California State Legislature to address
uncertainty and delay by creating a new streamlining mechanism in CEQA for infill projects that
promote a specific set of environmental policy objectives. The broad purposes of SB 226 are two-
fold:
1. Provide flexibility in project design by basing eligibility on environmental performance
rather than prescribing specific project characteristics; and
2. Allow infill projects to avoid repetitive environmental analysis of environmental effects
that were previously analyzed in a prior Environmental Impact Report for a planning-level
decision.
In order to qualify for the infill streamlining provision, a project site must either be in a developed
urban area or adjoin existing qualified urban uses on 75 percent of the site perimeter.
Appendix M of the CEQA Guidelines includes a set of performance standards required by SB 226,
which a qualifying project must satisfy in order to be eligible for infill streamlining. The Proposed
Project meets these performance standards, as further detailed in Section 5.1, Satisfaction of
Appendix M Performance Standards.
Compliance with the Appendix M performance standards leads to the next step in the infill
streamlining process, which is completion of the Appendix N Checklist in the CEQA Guidelines.
The Appendix N Checklist provides a tool to evaluate a development project and document its
eligibility to use the infill streamlining process. The Appendix N Checklist also assists the lead
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 2
agency in identifying and summarizing project-specific effects and how those effects are or are
not addressed in a prior programmatic level document or by uniformly applicable development
policies:
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur as a
result of an infill project, then the checklist answers must indicate whether that impact
has already been analyzed in a prior EIR. If the effect of the infill project is not more
significant that what has already been analyzed that effect of the infill project is not
subject to CEQA. The brief explanation accompanying this determination should include
page and section references to the portions of the prior EIR containing the analysis of that
effect. The brief explanation shall also indicate whether the prior EIR included any
mitigation measures to substantially lessen that effect and whether those measures have
been incorporated into the infill project.
Background of the prior environmental analysis is provided in Section 2.4, Environmental
Background.
Project Design Features (PDFs) and Standard Conditions/Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies
(PPPs)
The Appendix N Checklist references 1) Applicant-initiated Project Design Features (PDFs), 2)
existing Standard Conditions applied to all development on the basis of federal, State, or local
law, and 3) Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies currently in place which effectively reduce
environmental impacts. Standard Conditions and Existing Plans, Programs, or Policies are
collectively identified in this document as PPPs. Where applicable, PDFs and PPPs are listed to
show their effect in reducing potential environmental impacts. Where the application of these
measures does not reduce an impact to below a level of significance, applicable General Plan and
Zoning Code Update Program Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (EIR No. 330) and
Supplemental EIR No. 346 (EIR No. 346) (collectively referred herein as the Certified EIRs), are
identified. The City would include these PDFs and PPPs along with applicable Certified EIRs
mitigation measures (MMs) as Conditions of Approval of the Proposed Project.
1.2 Content and Format of an Appendix N: Environmental Checklist
This Appendix N Checklist includes the following sections:
Section 1: Introduction: This section provides information about CEQA, its requirements for
environmental review, and explains the Appendix N Checklist that evaluates the potential
impacts of the Proposed Project to the physical environment.
Section 2: Project Setting: This section provides information about the Proposed Project’s
location, the Project Site, and background.
Section 3: Project Description: This section provides a description of the Proposed Project’s
physical features and construction and operational characteristics.
Section 4: Discretionary Approvals: This section describes anticipated approvals and permits
needed for implementation of the Proposed Project.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 3
Section 5: Environmental Checklist: This section includes the Appendix N Checklist and evaluates
the Proposed Project’s potential to result in significant adverse effects to the physical
environment.
2 PROJECT SETTING
2.1 Project Location
The Proposed Project is located at 2420 and 2450 E. Lincoln Avenue, the southwest corner of E.
Lincoln Avenue and S. Sunkist Street in the City of Anaheim. The Project Site consists of two
parcels, identified as assessor’s parcel number (APN) 083-731-18 and 083-731-19, totaling 4.0
acres (Figure 1 – Regional Vicinity Map and Figure 2 – Local Vicinity). The parcel is trapezoidal in
shape and is bounded by Lincoln Avenue to the north, Sunkist Street to the east, existing single-
family residential to the south, and existing multi-family residential to the west.
2.2 Existing Land Uses and Designation of the Project Site
The Project Site is occupied by 56,274 square feet of commercial office buildings with associated
surface parking lot and landscaping. The existing General Plan land use designation on the Project
Site is Residential-Medium, which allows a density of up to 36 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
Existing zoning for the entire site is General Commercial (C-G), which provides for a range of
commercial and office land uses. However, a Residential Opportunity (RO) overlay zone is present
across the Project Site, which allows “by-right” housing development opportunities consistent
with residential General Plan designations on sites that are zoned or developed with non-
residential uses.
2.3 Surrounding Land Uses
The site is bound by the following land uses:
NORTH: Lincoln Avenue, with single-family residential neighborhood beyond
EAST: Sunkist Street, with multi-family residential development beyond
SOUTH: Single-family residential neighborhood
WEST: Multi-family residential development
2.4 Environmental Background
In May 2004, the Anaheim City Council certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 330,
prepared as a Program EIR for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330
evaluated impacts associated with implementation of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code
Update and created Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122 (MMP No. 122) to mitigate those
impacts. In September 2013, the Anaheim City Council certified Supplemental EIR No. 346 (SEIR
No. 346), as a supplemental EIR to EIR No. 330, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15163. SEIR
No. 346 was prepared to serve as environmental documentation for the Housing Opportunities
Sites Rezoning Project. The City approved Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A (MMP No.
122A) as part of SEIR No. 346. SEIR No. 346 supplemented EIR No. 330 in the areas of air quality,
greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation and traffic.
The Rezoning Project implemented a key strategy of the City’s 2006-2014 General Plan Housing
Element by rezoning 166 Housing Opportunities Sites identified in the Housing Element. The
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 4
rezoning included the application of an overlay zone to each property: either the Residential
Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone or the Mixed Use (MU) Overlay Zone. Both overlay zones allow
“by-right” housing development. The Housing Element identified the Project Site as Housing
Opportunity Sites 154 and 155, which received the RO Overlay Zone as a part of the Rezoning
Project.
One of the City’s goals in the Rezoning Project was to provide updated community-level
environmental review to facilitate redevelopment. The Rezoning and application of overlay zones
provides the opportunity for applicants to utilize Public Resources Code Section 21159.24, which
allows for an exemption from further CEQA review for urban infill residential development that
meets certain criteria. Properties designated as Housing Opportunity Sites by the General Plan
would quality for a Statutory Infill Housing Exemption, as defined by Public Resources Code
Section 21159.20. The City also intended for future projects consistent with the Certified EIRs
and Approved Project to be able to utilize CEQA’s streamlining provisions, including those
identified in SB 266, and implemented through CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.3, Streamlining
for Infill Projects.
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 122A (adopted in conjunction with the certification of S EIR
No. 346) applies to projects approved under the Program EIR for the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 1: Regional Location
Source: Anaheim GIS
Not to Scale
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 2: Local Vicinity
Source: Google Earth 2022
Not to Scale
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 7
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Project Background
The Project Site appears to have originally been vacant prior to 1902 and then developed with
a single residential structure by 1935. Between 1938 and 1972, the property was developed with
a residence and agricultural orchards. From 1975 to present, the property has been developed
with commercial uses. A Ralph’s grocery store was constructed in 1975 at 2420 E. Lincoln Avenue
and was subsequently replaced in 1989 by the existing office building and associated parking
and landscaping. The existing office building at 2450 E. Lincoln Avenue was constructed in 1975.
The Project Site was reclassified to the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone as a part of the
Rezoning Project and identified as Housing Opportunity Sites 154-155. The maximum buildout of
Housing Opportunity Sites 154-155, as listed in Table 3-2 of SEIR No. 346, is 139 residential units.
3.2 Proposed Project
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of an 83-unit residential townhouse project on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and
155. The proposed mix of residential units is summarized in Table 1 - Proposed Development and
shown in Figure 3 - Conceptual Site Plan, and Figure 4 - Typical Building Elevations.
Table 1 - Proposed Development
Model Number Number of Units Floor Plan Unit Size (SF)
Plan 1 34 2 bed/2.5 bath 1,415
Plan 2 14 3 bed/2.5 bath 1,460
Plan 3 10 3 bed/3.5 bath 1,800
Plan 4 8 4 bed/3.5 bath 1,761
Plan 5 17 4 bed/3.5 bath 1,834
Total 83 131,816
Architecture
The single-family attached homes would be located in ten three-story buildings along the
northern and eastern edges and in the center of the Project Site, with between six and ten units
per building. The architectural style of the proposed buildings is contemporary with Spanish
Colonial design details, including tile roof, stucco siding, decorative gable medallions, and
decorative metal balcony railings. Buildings would be 39’ and 39’-6” in height from grade to peak
of the gable roofline. Floorplans would range from two to four bedrooms and contain between
1,415 and 1,834 square feet.
Parking
Each unit would have an attached private two-car garage. Additional resident and guest surface
parking spaces are provided along the south and west property lines. A total of 238 parking
spaces would be provided to serve the residents and guests on the site.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 8
Landscape and Open Space
Landscaping would include the required 20-foot-wide landscape setback along E. Lincoln Avenue,
a 10-foot-wide landscape setback along S. Sunkist Street and the south property line, and 5-foot-
wide setback along the west property line, in addition to interior Project site landscaping
provided along walkways and in common areas. The Proposed Project would include the
installation of trees with low to medium irrigation needs, such as date palm, queen palm,
yellowwood, and palo verde. All grasses, shrubs, and groundcover included in the landscaping
plan would have low or medium irrigation needs. These landscape types would include ground
covers such as star jasmine and shrubs such as bottle brush, hopseed bush, yucca, and Japanese
privet. See Figure 5 – Landscape Plan, for details on specific landscape planting details.
The Proposed Project would provide 9,225 square feet of private open space features consisting
of individual patios and decks. In addition, common recreational areas totaling 15,627 square
feet include a dog park, community garden, and tot lot. Refer to Figure 6 - Open Space Plan, for
details on the open space and recreational facilities.
Lighting
Site lighting consists primarily of low-level lighting to prevent light intrusion into the residential
units, including a mix of bollards and targeted landscape lights. Tall light standards are also
utilized to light surface parking areas along the south property line. Refer to Figure 7 – Conceptual
Lighting Plan, for details on the type and placement of major site lighting features.
Site Circulation
Vehicular access to the Project Site would be from a two-way driveway entry on E. Lincoln Avenue
to the north and a two-way driveway entry from Sunkist Street to the east. Both entries are right
turn in-out only to conform to the existing street development pattern. Neither of the entries
would be signalized or gated. Pedestrian access is provided from Lincoln Avenue, along sidewalks
on the private roads and pedestrian walkways, connecting across the Project Site to Sunkist
Street.
The project will require between 4 feet and 11 feet of dedication along Lincoln Avenue to achieve
the ultimate right-of-way width. It will also require reconstruction of all sidewalks and the
addition of a 5-foot-wide landscaped parkway.
Utilities and Infrastructure
The Proposed Project would connect to existing water utility infrastructure in Sunkist Street,
including a 16-inch water line, an 8-inch sewer line, and a 48-inch storm drain. The Proposed
Project includes curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements along Lincoln Avenue and E. Sunkist
Street. Water and electrical service will be provided by Anaheim Public Utilities and sanitation
services will be provided by Republic Services as contracted through the City of Anaheim.
3.3 Construction and Schedule
The Proposed Project is anticipated to be fully operational in 2026. The Proposed Project is
anticipated to be built in multiple phases with demolition of the existing office buildings and
associated landscape and hardscape beginning in May 2023, grading beginning in June 2023, and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 9
vertical construction beginning in October 2023. A net import of 10,000 cubic yards of soil is
identified on the conceptual grading plan. It is anticipated that the first building would be
completed in February 2024, with the last building being completed in February 2026.
Construction activities include demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction,
architectural coatings, and paving.
4 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS
The Applicant requests City of Anaheim Planning Commission approval of the following
discretionary actions to implement the Proposed Project (DEV2021-00180):
• Conditional Use Permit to allow a residential planned unit development and attached
single-family units.
• Tentative Tract Map to establish lot subdivision for condominium purposes and right-of-
way dedication along Lincoln Avenue.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 3: Conceptual Site Plan
Source: Summa Architecture
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 4: Typical Building Elevations
Source: Summa Architecture
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 5: Conceptual Landscape Plan
Source: Summa Architecture
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 6: Open Space Plan
Source: Summa Architecture
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 7: Conceptual Lighting Plan
Source: Visual Concepts Lighting
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 15
5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
The Appendix N Checklist assists the Lead Agency in the evaluation of potential environmental
impacts of the Proposed Project. Project Design Features (PDFs), Standard Conditions/Existing
Plans, Programs, or Policies (PPPs), and mitigation measures from the Certified EIRs that are
applicable to the Proposed Project are included in the discussion for each topic area.
As discussed in Section 2.4, Environmental Background, the Project Site was analyzed in SEIR No.
346 as a housing opportunity site and is eligible for infill streamlining pursuant to Section 15183.3
of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21094.5 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), adopted per SB
226. SB 226 eliminates repetitive analysis of effects of a project that were previously analyzed in
a programmatic EIR for a planning-level decision or that are substantially mitigated by uniformly
applied development policies. The Appendix N Checklist determined that the Proposed Project
would not have effects that either have not been analyzed in the Certified EIRs or are more
significant than described in the Certified EIRs.
The Project Site allows a density of up to 36 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Existing zoning for
the entire site is General Commercial (C-G), which provides for a range of commercial and office
land uses. However, a Residential Opportunity (RO) overlay zone is present across the Project
Site, which allows “by-right” housing development opportunities consistent with residential
General Plan designations on sites that are zoned or developed with non-residential uses.
1. Project Title: KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
2. Lead Agency name and address: City of Anaheim, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92805
3. Contact person and phone number: Heather Allen, Principal Planner, 714-765-4958
4. Project Location: Southwest corner of E. Lincoln Avenue and S. Sunkist Street
5. Project sponsor’s name and address: KB Home, 9915 Mira Mesa Boulevard, Suite 100, San
Diego, CA 92131
6. General Plan and designation: Medium Density Residential
7. Zoning: General Commercial (C-G), within the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone
8. Prior Environmental Documents Analyzing the Effects of the Infill Project (including State
Clearinghouse Number if Assigned):
• Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330,
SCH No. 2003041105 (May 2004)
• City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report No. 346, SCH No. 2003041105 (September 2013)
9. Location of Priority Environmental Documents Analyzing the Effects of the Infill Project:
200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92805
10. Description of project: The Applicant is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a
Tentative Tract Map from the City for demolition of two commercial office buildings and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 16
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155,
including associated on-site and off-site improvements. See Section 3, Project Description.
11. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings, including
any prior uses of the project site, or, if vacant, describe the urban uses that exist on at least
75% of the project’s perimeter: The Project Site is bound by Lincoln Avenue and single-
family residential the north; Sunkist Street and multi-family residential to the east, single-
family residential to the south, and multi-family residential to the west. The Project Site is
currently developed with 56,274 square feet of commercial office building and associated
site development. Access to the Project Site is available directly from E. Lincoln Avenue and
S. Sunkist Street. Topography of the Project Site is predominantly a flat developed site with
existing paved parking lot and associated landscape planters. The Project Site previous uses
included agricultural orchards, residential, and commercial office. The existing General Plan
designation on the Project Site is Residential-Medium, which allows a density of up to 36
dwelling units per acre (du/ac). Existing zoning for the entire site is General Commercial (C-
G), which provides for a range of commercial and office land uses. However, a Residential
Opportunity (RO) overlay zone is present across the Project Site, which allows “by-right”
housing development opportunities consistent with residential General Plan designations on
sites that are zoned or developed with non-residential uses.
12. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement): None
13. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the
project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1?
If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of
significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality,
etc.?
Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead
agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify
and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the
potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public
Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California
Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code
section 5097.94 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered
by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources
Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
The Appendix N Checklist is not a type of CEQA document subject to the tribal consultation
requirements under PRC Section 21080.3.1. As part of the Certified EIRs, the City of Anaheim,
acting as Lead Agency, initiated consultation with California Native American tribes in
accordance with Senate Bill 18 (SB 18). No tribal cultural resources were identified as a result
of the consultation. No additional consultation is required in accordance with the
requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 17
5.1 Satisfaction of Appendix M Performance Standards
Provide the information demonstrating that the infill project satisfies the performance standards
in Appendix M. For mixed-use projects, the predominant use will determine which performance
standards apply to the entire project.
1. Does the non-residential infill project include a renewable energy feature? If so, describe
below. If not, explain below why it is not feasible to do so.
The Proposed Project is a residential infill project and is therefore not required to include an
on-site renewable energy feature. However, pursuant to Title 24 of the California Building
Code, the Proposed Project would include Energy Star rated appliances for all residential
units.
2. If the project site is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the
Government Code, either provide documentation of remediation or describe the
recommendations provided in a preliminary endangerment assessment or comparable
document that will be implemented as part of the project.
The Project Site is not identified as having Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs),
Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs), or Controlled Recognized
Environmental Conditions (CRECs). An analysis is included in Section 5.4.8, Hazards and
Hazardous Materials.
3. If the infill project includes residential units located within 500 feet, or such distance that
the local agency or local air district has determined is appropriate based on local
conditions, a high-volume roadway or other significant source of air pollution, as defined
in Appendix M, describe the measures that the project will implement to protect public
health. Such measures may include policies and standards identified in the local general
plan, specific plans, zoning code or community risk reduction plan, or measures
recommended in a health risk assessment, to promote the protection of public health.
Identify the policies or standards, or refer to the site-specific analysis, below. (Attach
additional sheets if necessary.)
The Proposed Project is not located within 500 feet of a rail line or a high-volume roadway
(SR-57) and therefore a health risk assessment (HRA) is not required.
4. For residential projects, the project satisfies which of the following?
☐ Located within a low vehicle travel area, as defined in Appendix M. (Attach VMT map.)
☒ Located within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along high-
quality transit corridor. (Figure 8 – Proximity to High Quality Transit Corridor Map)
☐ Consists of 300 or fewer units that are each affordable to low-income households.
(Attach evidence of legal commitment to ensure the continued availability and use of
the housing units for lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the
Health and Safety Code, for a period of at least 30 years, at monthly housing costs, as
determined pursuant to Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code.)
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 18
The Project Site is within 0.5 mile of an existing bus stop on Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) Route 57 on State College Boulevard (Exhibit 8), which has AM and PM
peak-hour headways of 15 minutes or less, which allows the Project Site to qualify as a
high-quality transit corridor.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Figure 8: Proximity to High Quality Transit Corridor
Source: City of Anaheim, SCAG
Not to Scale
OCTA Route 57
Bus Stop
Project Site
High Quality Transit Stops Buffer (1/2 mile)
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 20
This page is intentionally left blank.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 21
5.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by the Proposed Project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist
on the following pages.
☐ Aesthetics ☐ Agriculture & Forestry Resources ☐ Air Quality
☐ Biological Resources ☐ Cultural Resources ☐ Energy
☐ Geology/Soils ☐ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ☐ Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
☐ Hydrology/Water Quality ☐ Land Use/Planning ☐ Mineral Resources
☐ Noise ☐ Population/Housing ☐ Public Services
☐ Recreation ☐ Transportation ☐ Tribal Cultural Resources
☐ Utilities/Service Systems ☐ Wildfire ☐ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
5.3 Determination:
Based on this initial evaluation:
☒
I find that the proposed infill project WOULD NOT have any significant effects on the
environment that either have not already been analyzed in a prior EIR or that are more
significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21094.5,
CEQA does not apply to such effects. A Notice of Determination (Section 15094) will be
filed.
☐ I find that although the proposed infill project will have effects that either have not been
analyzed in a prior EIR, or are more significant than describe in the prior EIR, and that no
uniformly applicable development policies would substantially mitigate such effects. With
respect to those effects that are subject to CEQA, I find that such effects WOULD NOT be
significant and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION, or if the project is a Transit Priority Project a
Sustainable Communities Assessment, will be prepared.
☐ I find that the proposed infill project will have effects that either have not been analyzed
in a prior EIR, or are more significant than describe in the prior EIR, and that no uniformly
applicable development policies would substantially mitigate such effects. I find that
although those effects could be significant, there will not be a significant effect in this case
because revisions in the infill project have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, or if the project is a Transit Priority
Project a SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, will be prepared.
☐ I find that the proposed infill project would have effects that either have not been
analyzed in a prior EIR, or are more significant than described in the prior EIR, and that no
uniformly applicable development policies would substantially mitigate such effects. I find
that those effects WOULD be significant, and an infill ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required to analyze those effects that are subject to CEQA.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 22
_____________________________________________ _______________________
Signature Date
Heather Allen, Principal Planner _______________________
Printed Name/Title Phone
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 23
5.4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of Infill Project
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one
involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.
the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific
screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as
on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as
well as operational impacts.
3. For the purposes of this checklist, “prior EIR” means the environmental impact report
verified for a planning level decision, as supplemented by any subsequent or
supplemental environmental impact reports, negative declarations, or addenda to those
documents. “planning-level decision” means the enactment or amendment of a general
plan, community plan, specific plan, or zoning code. (Section 15183.3(e).)
4. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur as a
result of an infill project, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact
has already been analyzed in a prior EIR. If the effect of the infill project is not more
significant than what has already been analyzed, that effect of the infill project is not
subject to CEQA. The brief explanation accompanying this determination should include
page and section references to the portions of the prior EIR containing the analysis of that
effect. The brief explanation shall also indicate whether the prior EIR included any
mitigation measures to substantially lessen that effect and whether those measures has
been incorporated into the infill project.
5. If the infill project would cause a significant adverse effect that either is specific to the
project site and was not analyzed in a prior EIR or is more significant than what was
analyzed in a prior EIR, the lead agency must determine whether uniformly applicable
development policies or standards that have been adopted by the lead agency, or city or
county, would substantially mitigate that effect. If so, the checklist shall explain how the
infill project’s implementation of the uniformly applicable development policies will
substantially mitigate that effect. That effect of the infill project is not subject to CEQA if
the lead agency makes a finding, based upon substantial evidence, that the development
policies or standards will substantially mitigate that effect.
6. If all effects of an infill project were either analyzed in a prior EIR or are substantially
mitigated by uniformly applicable development policies or standards, CEQA does not
apply to the project, and the lead agency shall file a Notice of Determination.
7. Effects of an infill project that either have not been analyzed in a prior EIR, or that
uniformly applicable development policies or standards do not substantially mitigate, are
subject to CEQA. With respect to those effects of the infill project that are subject to
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 24
CEQA, the checklist shall indicate whether those effects are significant, less than
significant with mitigation, or less than significant. If there are one or more “Significant
Impact” entries when the determination is made, an infill EIR is required. The infill EIR
should be limited to analysis of those effects determined to be significant. (Sections
15128, 15183.3(d).)
8. “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures will reduce an effect of an infill project that is subject to CEQA from
“Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe
the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how those measures reduce the effect to a
less than significant level. If the effects of an infill project that are subject to CEQA are less
than significant with mitigation incorporated, the lead agency may prepare a Mitigated
Negative Declaration. If all of the effects of the infill project that are subject to CEQA are
less than significant, the lead agency may prepare a Negative Declaration.
9. The analysis of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold used to evaluate each question; and
b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than
significance.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 25
This page intentionally left blank.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 26
5.4.1 Aesthetics
Would the project:
EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State
scenic highway?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
c) In non-urbanized areas,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of the
site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that
are experienced from a
publicly accessible vantage
point). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the
project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic
quality?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare
which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the
area?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the aesthetic impacts related to the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.1.4 concluded that buildout of the General Plan
would result in less than significant impacts related to scenic resources, scenic vistas, visual
character, and light and glare upon implementation of General Plan goals and policies, and
existing codes and regulations. No mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122.
Supplemental EIR No. 346, Chapter 7, page 7-3 and Appendix A, page 27 concluded that buildout
of the Housing Opportunity Sites would not result in new impacts or impacts greater than those
identified in EIR No. 330. No new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Aesthetic resources and scenic vistas within the City are protected through implementation of
the Green Element and Community Design Element of the General Plan. The purpose of the
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 27
Green Element is to combine all of Anaheim’s open space, conservation, recreation, and
landscaping resources into one comprehensive, integrated document. The Green Element
considers not only existing parks and open space, but also potential recreational opportunities
and enhancements to the appearance of existing areas through enhanced landscaping of
Anaheim’s corridors, community edges, and City entryways. The Community Design Element
provides policy guidance for the built environment to recognize the importance of community
appearance and identity to its vitality, economic health, and overall quality of life.
A 4.5-mile portion of SR-91 is an officially designated State Scenic Highway from SR-55 to Weir
Canyon Road. The freeway runs along the banks of the Santa Ana River and views include
mountain ridgelines, rolling hills, canyons, intermittent riparian and chaparral vegetation, and
residential and commercial development. The Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone in the Anaheim
Municipal Code enforces this designation, and any impacts are less than significant.
The City of Anaheim is largely built out. Major open space features are in the eastern part of
the City within the Hill and Canyon Areas. 7,788 acres of land are designated for Open
Space/Recreation, including golf courses, parks, open space, and water uses. The preservation
of landforms within the Hill and Canyon areas as part of The Irvine Ranch Land Reserve and the
Cypress Canyon addition to the Chino Hills State Park will result in a substantial open space
preservation area that includes the highest elevation and thus most visible portions of the City.
As a result, potential impacts to scenic vistas are less than significant.
Development that occurs based on the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code
Update may introduce additional lighting to provide nighttime street and building illumination,
as well as security lighting, nighttime traffic, and light associated with future development. The
Community Design and Green Elements call for comprehensive corridor landscape programs
and use of trees, hedges, and berms as screening measures along roadways, and design
guidelines for specific areas of the City will reduce the impacts of light and glare to a level of
less than significant.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155,
which would have a maximum height of 39 feet 6 inches at the highest point on the three-story
buildings. The existing two-story commercial office buildings on the Project Site are of
contemporary architectural style with simplified Spanish Colonial design elements, including a
tile roof, stucco walls, and applied arched window and door moldings. The Proposed Project
has a similar architectural vernacular, but with an expanded material palette and articulated
massing. Replacing nondescript office buildings with residential buildings of varied architectural
style and mass would improve the visual character and quality of the Project Site by providing
more visual architectural interest along the Lincoln Avenue corridor, as well enhanced
landscaping in the property setback areas. See Figure 4 - Typical Building Elevations and Figure
5 – Conceptual Landscape Plan.
EIR No. 330 identifies SR-91 east of SR-55, located over three miles to the northeast of the
Project Site, as a scenic highway. EIR No. 330 also identifies the open space features of Anaheim
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 28
Hills, over five miles to the east, as scenic vistas. Due to the distance and intervening urban
development between the Project Site and the scenic highway and vistas in Anaheim Hills, the
Proposed Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on these scenic resources.
Residential uses on the Project Site would result in less than significant increases in nighttime
light or glare as the Proposed Project is replacing an existing commercial office use in an
urbanized neighborhood. The Proposed Project would use typical residential construction
materials such a wood, stucco, and glass, and would not use reflective materials that would
result in glare. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Proposed Project would be subject
to building code requirements that include an assessment of exterior lighting plans to ensure
lighting fixtures are shielded to prevent light spillage. With the residential nature of the
Proposed Project and the approval of lighting plans, there would be no new or increase in
significant impacts related to lighting and glare. Therefore, a less than significant impact will
occur, and no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.1, Aesthetics, Pages 5-1 to 5-12.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-3 and Appendix A, Initial Study, Page 27.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 29
5.4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
No Impact ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning
for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
No Impact ☐ ☒
c) Conflict with existing zoning
for, or cause rezoning of,
forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by
Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland
zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
No Impact ☐ ☒
d) Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
No Impact ☐ ☒
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which,
due to their location or
nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to
non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to
non-forest use?
No Impact ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts.
Program EIR No. 330 concluded that buildout of the General Plan would result in no potential
impacts to agricultural and forest resources and no mitigation measures were required in MMP
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 30
No. 122. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites
would result in no new or increased significant impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and
no new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
No Impact (a – e). The majority of the City of Anaheim is built out and does not have any large
areas which are currently in agricultural production. However, the General Plan continues to
allow use of easements for limited agricultural production including nursery crops. There is no
unique, prime or farmland of statewide importance located within the City. There are no
Williamson Act contracts within the project area. No impacts would occur.
The Proposed Project is currently developed with commercial office uses, is not located on a site
designated as unique, prime or farmland of statewide importance, and does not have a
Williamson Act contract. Current zoning is General Commercial (C-G), which provides for a range
of commercial and office land uses, with a Residential Opportunity (RO) overlay zone. Therefore,
the Proposed Project would not conflict with zoning for forest land, timberland, or result in the
loss or conversion of forest land.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 8, Impacts Found Not Significant, Page 11-1 and Appendix
A, Initial Study and NOP.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-2 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 27-28.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 31
5.4.3 Air Quality
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Less than Significant ☐ ☒
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is
non- attainment under an
applicable federal or State
ambient air quality
standard?
Significant Unavoidable
Adverse Impact ☐ ☒
c) Expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
Less than Significant
After Mitigation ☐ ☒
d) Result in other emissions
(such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
Less than Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330, Section 5.2.4 addressed the air quality impacts associated with implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. It concluded that buildout of the General Plan
would generate emissions in excess of the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s
(SCAQMD) regional thresholds for carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen
oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM10). However, the General Plan is consistent with the Air
Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and other regional plan strategies to reduce the number and
length of trips in the region and would improve the balance between jobs and housing at the sub-
regional level. While mitigation measures included in the EIR would reduce emissions, the impact
would remain significant and unavoidable. Impacts associated with potential obstruction of
applicable air quality plans, violation of air quality standards, exposure of sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations, and odors were all less than significant without the need
for mitigation.
SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Approved Project would remain significant and
unavoidable with regard to regional thresholds for criteria pollutants. Impacts associated with
exposing sensitive receptors to major sources of air pollution were found to be less than
significant with the addition of a new mitigation measure: MM 5.2-7. MM 5.2-7 requires the
preparation of a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) for certain projects in order to reduce the air
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 32
quality land use compatibility impacts of the Approved Project to less than significant. All other
impacts were found to be less than significant.
EIR No. 330 acknowledges that though planned development within the City would ultimately be
market driven, for modeling purposes, the Air Quality analysis assumed that all allowable uses
would be implemented by the year 2025 and emissions are based on this horizon.
Construction activity would cause temporary, short-term emissions of various air pollutants.
Though information regarding specific development projects, soil types, and the locations of
receptors would be needed in order to quantify the level of impact, it is reasonable to conclude
that given the amount of development that the General Plan and Zoning Code Update could
accommodate, some major construction activities could be occurring at any given time which
could exceed SCAQMD’s adopted significance thresholds. Actual significance would be
determined on a project-by-project basis as development applications are submitted.
Operational impacts could result from local and regional vehicle emissions generated by future
traffic growth, as well as direct emissions due to the use of on-site utilities and consumer goods
associated with the proposed land uses. Regarding emissions from mobile sources, because of
more stringent emission standards and improved technology related to newer vehicles, future
emissions generated within the City would be less than current levels. Emissions from various
industrial and commercial processes allowed under the General Plan and Zoning Code Update
are controlled at the local and regional level through permitting and would be subject to further
study and health risk assessment prior to the issuance of any necessary air quality permits and
are not further addressed in the analysis. However, even after the application of Goals and
Policies, as well as Mitigation Measures to reduce air quality impacts, cumulative mobile source
and area source emissions related to future growth would exceed the daily SCAQMD thresholds
for CO2, NOx, ROG, and PM10 in the SCAB region, which is a federal non-attainment area. This is
considered a significant and unavoidable adverse impact, and the Anaheim City Council adopted
a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
Although implementation of development consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Code
Update will result in significant regional air quality impacts, it is consistent with the AQMP and
other regional plan strategies to reduce the number of trips and the length of trips in the region,
and to improve the balance between jobs and housing at the sub-regional level. The General Plan
and Zoning Code Update facilitates the development of housing opportunities in close proximity
with regional employment and transportation centers. Therefore, the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update is consistent with the AQMP, and this is not considered to be a significant impact.
Projected CO2 concentrations at build out are below the State and Federal 1-hour and 8-hour
standards, therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
Future residential and commercial development would involve minor odor-generating activities,
such as backyard barbeque smoke, lawn mower exhaust, application of exterior paints from
home improvement, etc. These types and concentrations of odors are typical of residential
communities and are not considered significant air quality impacts.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 33
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units and 238 parking spaces on Housing Opportunity
Sites 154 and 155. The following analysis is based on the Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and
Energy Impact Analysis report prepared by Ganddini Group, dated November 21, 2022 (Appendix
A). Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including
land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be
analyzed for consistency with the AQMP". Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually
not required. A Proposed Project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it
furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook
identifies two key indicators of consistency:
(1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air
quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air
quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.
(2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based
on the year of project buildout and phase.
Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections.
Criteria 1 – Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations
Based on the air quality modeling analysis prepared for the Proposed Project, short-term
construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and
local thresholds of significance. This Air Analysis also found that, long-term operations impacts
will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of
significance.
Therefore, the Proposed Project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air
pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first
criterion.
Criteria 2 – Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?
Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the
Proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure
that the analyses conducted for the Proposed P roject are based on the same forecasts as the
AQMP. The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy prepared by
SCAG (2020) includes chapters on: the challenges in a changing region, creating a plan for our
future, and the road to greater mobility and sustainable growth. These chapters currently
respond directly to federal and State requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 34
required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable
regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Anaheim Land Use Plan defines the
assumptions that are represented in the AQMP.
The Project Site has a current land use designation of Residential Medium Density on the City of
Anaheim General Plan Land Use Map. The Residential Medium Density land use designation
allows residential uses at density of up to 36 du/ac. The Proposed Project includes 83, 3-story
townhome dwelling units on approximately 4 acres, at a density of approximately 21 du/ac.
Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the
Project Site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion.
Based on the above, the Proposed Project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD
AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur, and no further environmental analysis
is required.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality
standard?
Within the SCAQMD, this impact relates to regional criteria pollutant impacts, determined by the
comparison of the Proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions to SCAQMD’s
regional significance thresholds. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version
2022.1 calculated emissions associated with the Proposed Project. Detailed modeling
assumptions and methodology are contained in the Air Analysis. Table 2 and Table 3 below
provide the results of the modeling.
Table 2 - Construction-Related Regional Pollutant Emissions
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 1, 2 19.70 34.60 35.90 0.07 8.10 4.29
SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Notes:
Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1
1. On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads.
Demolition, site preparation, and on-site grading PM-10 and PM-2.5 emissions show mitigated
values for fugitive dust for compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403.
2. Grading, construction, painting, and paving phases may overlap.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 35
Table 3 - Regional Operational Pollutant Emissions
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 5.84 3.77 23.80 0.06 1.91 0.50
Reduction from existing
office uses to be removed
-3.95 -2.24 -21.50 -0.05 -1.58 -0.33
Total 1.89 1.53 2.30 0.01 0.33 0.17
SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Notes:
Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1; the higher of either summer or winter emissions
As shown, construction and operational emissions are far below SCAQMD regional emissions
thresholds of significance for any pollutant. EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346 determined that there
would be a significant and unavoidable impact related to cumulatively considerable increase in
criteria pollutants. As illustrated above, the Proposed Project would result in less than significant
impacts related to criteria pollutants and would not introduce impacts that have not already been
analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously analyzed,
or that the application of uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially
mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
The SCAQMD has developed Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) in addition to the regional
thresholds described above to address localized impacts of criteria pollutants. The LSTs depend
on the location of the Proposed Project, overall size of the Project Site and distance of existing
sensitive receptors from the Project Site. The nearest sensitive receptors to the Proposed Project
include the existing single-family residential uses with property lines located adjacent to the
south and approximately 100 feet (~30 meters) to the north and the existing multi-family
residential uses with property lines located adjacent to the west and approximately 270 feet (~82
meters) to the northeast and 75 feet (~23 meters) to the southeast of the project site; therefore,
to be conservative, the 25 meter threshold was used.
According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a project
if the Proposed Project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources (such as heavy-
duty trucks) that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site, such as industrial
warehouse/transfer facilities. The Proposed Project is the development of the site with
residential uses and does not include such uses. Therefore, due the lack of stationary source
emissions, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is warranted.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 36
Table 4 - Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors
On-Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 27.30 23.50 2.95 1.37
Site Preparation 26.90 24.30 1.23 3.76
Grading 20.00 19.70 3.70 2.21
Building Construction 11.80 13.20 0.55 0.51
Paving 6.52 8.84 0.29 0.26
Architectural Coating 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
SCAQMD Thresholds 115 715 6 4
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No
Notes:
Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables 2 acre at a distance of 25 meters in SRA 17
Central Orange County.
As shown, the Proposed Project would not exceed the LSTs for construction and operation for
any pollutants and the impacts would be less than significant for localized criteria pollutants. The
Proposed Project would not introduce impacts that have not already been analyzed in EIR No.
330 and SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly
applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate; therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
d) Result in other emission (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
Construction-Related Odor Impacts
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of
materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the
construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease
upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Due to the short-term nature and
limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors
would occur during construction of the proposed project. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be
emitted during construction of the project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions
would disperse rapidly from the Project Site and therefore should not reach an objectionable
level at the nearest sensitive receptors.
Operations-Related Odor Impacts
Potential sources that may emit odors during the ongoing operations of the P roposed Project
would include odor emissions from the intermittent diesel delivery truck emissions and trash
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 37
storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the Project Site and through
compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402 no significant impact related to odors would occur during
the ongoing operations of the proposed project.
The Proposed Project would not introduce impacts that EIR 330 and SEIR 346 have not already
analyzed or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable
development policies would not substantially mitigate; therefore, no further environmental
analysis is required.
The analysis concluded that the Proposed Project would not result in regional emissions
exceeding SCAQMD thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutant, exceed localized
significance thresholds for any criteria pollutant, or generate objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people.
Likewise, air quality impacts of the Proposed Project would not exceed any threshold of
significance for criteria pollutants and would not increase the development intensity reflected in
the General Plan; therefore, the analysis concluded the Proposed Project would not conflict with
the SCAQMD AQMP.
Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, construction material
use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from
construction activities. Construction-source odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and
intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect substantial
numbers of people. Therefore, potential construction-source odor impacts are less than
significant.
The air quality analysis found that the Proposed Project would generate a net decrease of
emissions of VOCs, CO, SOx, PM-10, and PM-2.5, and generate a net decrease of NOx compared
to existing conditions (Appendix A, Table 9). The analysis substantiates that the Proposed Project
would not result in a carbon monoxide hotspot or generate objectionable odors. Therefore, a
less than significant impact will occur, and no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.2-1: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Property Owner/Developer shall include
a note on all grading plans, which requires the construction contractor to implement following
measures during grading. These measures shall also be discussed at the pre-grade conference.
• Use low emission mobile construction equipment.
• Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned.
• Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment.
• Utilize existing power sources (i.e., power poles) when feasible.
• Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 38
• Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. When feasible, construction should be
planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum.
• Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours.
• Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities
(the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and
satellite parking areas with a shuttle service).
Sources:
Appendix A – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact
Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., November 21, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.2, Air Quality, Page 5-13 through 5-34.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 5.1, Air Quality, Page 5.1-1 through
5.1-25; Chapter7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page 7-4 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP,
pages 28-29.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 39
5.4.4 Biological Resources
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, or NOAA Fisheries?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural
community identified in local or
regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse
effect on State or federally
protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 40
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase in
Impact Severity
e) Conflict with any local policies
or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
f) Conflict with the provisions of
an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat
conservation plan?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 addressed the potential impacts to biological resources associated with implementation of
the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.3.4 concluded that the
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts to biological resources
upon implementation of General Plan goals and policies, existing codes and regulations, and
MMs 5.3-1 through 5.3-9 in MMP No. 122. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded that the buildout
of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased significant impacts than
those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
The sensitive vegetation communities in the City of Anaheim include coastal sage scrub, coast
live oak/walnut woodland, riparian areas, and wetlands primarily in the Hill and Canyon Area.
The area is also home to a number of sensitive animal species, and it provides important foraging,
dispersal, migratory, and wildlife corridors. The areas along the Santa Ana River and the eastern
portion of the City contain riparian habitat that may be impacted by development and
recreational uses in these areas. Implementation of development consistent with the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update could result in both direct and indirect significant adverse impacts
to wildlife and habitat occurring in the Hill and Canyon Area and in the Santa Ana River. The
Project site is not proximate to these areas.
Several areas within the Hill and Canyon Area of the City and its Sphere-of-Influence are utilized
as migratory corridors for the movement of wildlife. Development within the Hill and Canyon
Area could cause an increase in both vehicular traffic levels and nighttime light levels. Both of
these factors have been found to deter the movement of many animals. The Project site is not
proximate to these areas.
To minimize these impacts, the General Plan and Zoning Code Update establishes goals and
policies related to the protection of open space and wildlife habitat and migratory corridors, as
well as tree preservation in accordance with the City of Anaheim Street Tree Ordinance. The
majority of impacts will occur as a result of project-specific activities and development proposals
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 41
would be assessed for potential impacts pursuant to CEQA and associated State and federal
regulations at that time. Mitigation measures may be required at the project level to minimize
the impacts of development. Implementation of the adopted NCCP/HCP, the General Plan Goals
and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and mitigation measures will reduce all biological
impacts to a level of insignificance.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States
Fish and Wildlife Service?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and ancillary structures and has non-
native trees, shrubs, and turf along the property boundaries. The Project Site contains no
potential native species habitat areas.
Consistent with the analysis of impacts in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346, the development of the
Proposed Project has the potential to impact protected bird nests due to the removal of
ornamental vegetation or indirectly harm birds though the generation of noise, lights, and other
man-made disturbances that could result in the abandonment of eggs or young. Nesting habitat
for birds and raptors is protected by California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Code
Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513. The loss of an active nest would be considered a potentially
significant impact. The implementation of MM 5.3-3 and MM 5.3-4 from Program EIR No. 330
would reduce any of these potential impacts by requiring pre-construction surveys for nesting
birds and limiting tree removal to outside the nesting season, respectively. Through the
implementation of these mitigation measures, the Proposed Project would not have any
significant impacts related to candidate, sensitive, or special status species that either EIR has
not already analyzed or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly
applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate; therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or United States Fish and Wildlife Service?
The Project Site is entirely developed and surrounded by extensive urban development. The
Project Site does not contain any naturally occurring vegetation communities that could be
considered as sensitive such as riparian or coastal sage scrub habitats. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not have any significant impacts related to riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community that EIR No. 330 or SEIR No. 346 have not already analyzed or that are more
significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not
substantially mitigate; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 42
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
The Project Site is entirely developed and no wetlands or other hydrological features that meet
criteria as waters of the United States or waters of the State are present on the Project Site.
Additionally, the Project Site is not located adjacent to any known potentially jurisdictional water
body. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to wetlands
that EIR No. 330 or SEIR No. 346 have not already analyzed or that are more significant than
previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially
mitigate; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of wildlife nursery sites?
The Project Site is entirely developed and is surrounded on all sides by urban development,
roadways and other man-made structures that serve as barriers to wildlife movement. Therefore,
the Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community that EIR No. 330 or SEIR No. 346 have not already analyzed or that
are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
The Proposed Project may be subject to the street tree ordinance based upon the City of Anaheim
Director of Community Services review. If applicable, a tree replacement plan would be required
and submitted to the Director of Community Services for review and approval pursuant to
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 13.12 as identified in PPP Bio-1.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
The Project Site is entirely developed and surrounded by urban development. There is no
applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan affecting the
Project Site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to
conflicts with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources that EIR No. 330 or SEIR
No. 346 have not already analyzed or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that
uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate; therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP Bio-1: The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with all provisions of Anaheim Municipal
Code Section 13.12 related to tree preservation.
PPP Bio-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with the provisions of the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, Federal Endangered Species Act, the California Endangered Species Act, and the
Central/Coastal Subregion (NCCP/HCP) for protection of Federal or State listed species.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 43
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.3-3: If construction activity is timed to occur during the nesting season (typically between
March 1 and July 1), developers will be required to provide focused surveys for nesting birds
pursuant to California Department of Fish and Game requirements. Such surveys shall identify
avoidance measures taken to protect active nests.
MM 5.3-4: Removal of non-native trees shall be permitted only outside the nesting season.
Sources:
Appendix B – Results of a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study for the 2420 East
Lincoln Avenue Project, APNs 083-731-18 and -19, Orange County, California, Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., rev. November 18, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page 7-4 and Appendix A, Initial
Study and NOP, Pages 29-30.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013. Pages 2-4.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 44
5.4.5 Cultural Resources
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a historical
resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant
to §15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
c) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 addressed the potential impacts to cultural resources associated with implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.4.4 concluded that the
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impact to cultural resources with
the implementation of the General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and
MM 5.4-1, 5.4-2 and 5.4-3 required in MMP No. 122. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded that
the buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased significant
impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were required in
MMP No. 122A.
The City of Anaheim has a number of identified historic structures and sites that are eligible for
National Register of Historic Resources listing, particularly in the Anaheim Colony area, which
may be vulnerable to development activities accompanying revitalization. The City, along with
many of its citizens, has taken a key role in the preservation and enhancement of its historic
resources. The General Plan and Zoning Code Update supports and expands upon those efforts.
Policies within the General Plan Community Design Element establish specific measures that the
City and its citizens will take to continue to enhance its historic buildings and districts.
Archival research indicates a prehistoric resource area (CA-Ora-303) is located in the Hill and
Canyon Area and a 1970 registry of artifacts comprised of manos, hammerstones, choppers, lithic
flakes, and faunal bones was assigned to locations within north-facing rock shelters within this
area. Subsequent field surveys failed to reveal additional artifacts.
Implementation of the General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and
mitigation measures will reduce all cultural resource impacts to a level of insignificance.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 45
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
and
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to Section 15064.5?
and
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping.
MM 5.4-1 requires the Applicant document the presence/absence of historic resources for areas
with documented or inferred resource presence. Based on the records search performed for
preparation of Appendix B, the Project Site has been continually occupied since at least 1910.
The property was used primarily as a citrus grove, with a single residence, until circa 1965. In
1975, the citrus grove was graded, a Ralph’s was constructed, and a parking lot was paved. The
presence of the citrus grove since at least 1910 indicates that the Project Site has been highly
disturbed. However, early twentieth century refuse associated with the Paulus family, and
possibly subsequent farmers, could be located underneath the structures and parking lot. It is
unlikely, however, that any historic refuse deposits would be intact, given the construction and
demolition which occurred periodically from the 1970s through the 1980s. Additionally, as the
residence was removed as early as 1965, and the Ralph’s was constructed in 1975, it is unlikely
that there are any previously recorded cultural resources located within the Project Site.
The Project Site is not located within a designated historic district and does not contain any
known or documented cultural resources eligible for listing on the California Register of Historic
Places or the National Register of Historic Places.
As required by MM 5.4-2, the Applicant conducted Cultural and Paleontological Resources
Records Searches (Appendix B). The consultant reviewed available historic USGS maps and aerial
photographs for the Project Site, in addition to the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(Appendix D) and available easement deeds.
The records search for the Project Site was also requested from the South Central Coastal
Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on August 13, 2021 and results
were received on October 5, 2021. The records search results indicate that no previously
recorded sites or reports are recorded within or crossing the Project Site.
As addressed above, with the implementation of mitigation, the Proposed Project would result
in less than significant cultural resources impacts and would not introduce impacts that have not
already been analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously
analyzed, or that the application of uniformly applicable development policies would not
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 46
substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.4-1: City staff shall require property owners/developers to provide studies to document
the presence/absence of historic resources for areas with documented or inferred resource
presence. On properties where resources are identified, such studies shall provide a detailed
mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,
based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
The requirement for historic resources documentation set forth in this mitigation
measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Cultural and Biological Due
Diligence Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix B). Consequently, no
further action is required.
MM 5.4-2: City staff shall require property owners/developers to provide studies to document
the presence/absence of archaeological and/or paleontological resources for areas with
documented or inferred resource presence. On properties where resources are identified, such
studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery
and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
The requirement for archaeological and paleontological resources documentation set
forth in this mitigation measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Cultural
and Biological Due Diligence Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix B).
Consequently, no further action is required.
MM 5.4-3: All archaeological resources shall be subject to the provisions of CEQA (Public
Resources Code) Section 21083.2.
Sources:
Appendix B – Results of a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study for the 2420 East
Lincoln Avenue Project, APNs 083-731-18 and -19, Orange County, California, Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., rev. November 18, 2022.
Appendix D – Phase I Environmental Assessment, 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Hillman Consulting, August 31, 2021.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.4, Cultural Resources, Pages 5-49 through 5-59.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-2 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 30.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013. Pages 2-7 to 2-11.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 47
5.4.6 Energy
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
a) Result in potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?
Less Than Significant ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with or obstruct a
State or local plan for
renewable energy or
energy efficiency?
Less Than Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330, prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Project did not explicitly evaluate
energy impacts because this impact area was not included in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G
checklist until 2019, and the City did not have adopted energy policies at the time of preparation.
Supplemental EIR No. 346, as prepared for the Housing Opportunity Sites Rezoning Project,
discussed energy efficiency and energy policy in conjunction with analysis of greenhouse gas
emissions (GHG), summarized in Section 5.4.8. SEIR No. 346 concluded that GHG impacts would
be less than significant after mitigation. No potentially significant energy impacts were identified.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. Compliance with
California Building Standards Code Title 24 energy efficiency requirements (CALGreen), are
considered demonstrable evidence of efficient use of energy.
In addition to the findings required in Appendix G, Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines states
that the means of achieving the goal of energy conservation includes the following:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas and oil; and
• Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.
Appendix A analyzed potential construction phase and operational phase energy demands.
Information from the CalEEMod 2022.1 Output contained within the same report and utilized for
air quality and GHG analyses, was also utilized for this analysis. The CalEEMod outputs detail
project-related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy
demands.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 48
Construction Energy Demands
The construction schedule is anticipated to occur over 33 months, between the beginning of May
2023 and the beginning of February 2026. Staging of construction vehicles and equipment will
occur on the approximately four-acre site.
The total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Proposed
Project is estimated to be approximately $10,309.33. Furthermore, Anaheim Public Utilities’
general service rate schedule (GS-1) is approximately $0.18 per kWh of electricity. As shown in
Table 15 of the Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis report by Ganddini
Group (Appendix A), the total electricity usage from project construction related activities is
estimated to be approximately 58,509 kWh.
Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over
the course of P roject construction. Proposed Project construction activities would consume an
estimated 87,111 gallons of diesel fuel. As stated previously, Project construction would
represent a “single-event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on-going or permanent
commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.
It is assumed that construction worker trips are from light duty autos, light duty truck 1, and light
duty truck 2 at a mix of 25 percent/50 percent/25 percent, respectively, along area roadways.
With respect to estimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT), the construction worker trips would
generate an estimated 373,915 VMT. Data regarding project-related construction worker trips
were based on CalEEMod 2022.1 model defaults. An estimated 14,698 gallons of fuel would be
consumed for construction worker trips.
With respect to estimated VMT, the vendor and hauling trips would generate an estimated
52,241 VMT. Data regarding project-related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod
2022.1 model defaults.
Construction equipment used over the approximately 33-month construction phase would
conform to California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations and California emissions standards
and is evidence of related fuel efficiencies. There are no unusual project characteristics or
construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy
intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current
emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the
project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
Operational Energy Demands
The Proposed Project is estimated to generate a total of 598 trips per day and the existing office
uses to be removed by the Proposed Project generate 610 trips per day. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would have a net decrease of 12 trips per day after the reduction from the removal of
existing office uses. The vehicle fleet mix was used from the CalEEMod output. Table 20 of the
Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis Report (Ganddini Group,
Appendix A) shows that an estimated 72,258 gallons of fuel would be consumed per year for the
operation of the Proposed Project. However, the existing offices uses to be removed by the
Proposed Project consume approximately 86,339 gallons of fuel per year. Therefore, assuming
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 49
the reduction of existing uses, operation of Proposed Project would result in a net decrease of
approximately 14,082 gallons of fuel consumption per year.
Trip generation and VMT generated by the Proposed Project are consistent with other similar
single-family townhome projects of similar scale and configuration as reflected respectively in
the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021). That
is, the Proposed Project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in
excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy
consumption. Furthermore, the State of California consumed approximately 4.2 billion gallons of
diesel and 15.1 billion gallons of gasoline in 2015.47,48 Therefore, the increase in fuel
consumption from the Proposed Project is insignificant in comparison to the State’s demand.
Therefore, project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient,
wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
Building operation and site maintenance (including landscape maintenance) would result in the
consumption of electricity (provided by Anaheim Public Utilities) and natural gas (provided by
Southern California Gas Company). After the reduction from existing office use being removed
as part of the project, the estimated electricity demand for the Proposed Project is a net decrease
of approximately 405,795 kWh per year. In 2020, the residential sector of the Orange County
consumed approximately 7,765 million kWh of electricity. In addition, after the reduction from
existing office use being removed as part of the Proposed Project, the estimated natural gas
consumption for the Proposed Project is approximately 1,755,487 kBTU per year. In 2020, the
residential sector of the County consumed approximately 387 million therms of gas. Therefore,
the increase in both electricity and natural gas demand from the Proposed Project is insignificant
compared to the County’s 2020 residential sector demand.
Energy use in buildings is divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy
consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building such as in plug-in
appliances. In California, the California Building Standards Code Title 24 governs energy
consumed by the built environment, mechanical systems, and some types of fixed lighting. Non-
building energy use, or “plug-in” energy use can be further subdivided by specific end-use
(refrigeration, cooking, appliances, etc.). The proposed project would be required to comply with
Title 24 standards.
Furthermore, the Proposed Project energy demands in total would be comparable to other
residential projects of similar scale and configuration. Therefore, the Proposed Project facilities’
energy demands and energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or
otherwise unnecessary.
Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency
Regarding federal transportation regulations, the Project Site is located in an already developed
area. Access to/from the Project Site is from existing roads. These roads are already in place so
the Project Site would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct any future intermodal
transportation plans or projects in the project area.
Regarding the State’s Energy Plan and compliance with Title 24 California Code of Regulations
(CCR) energy efficiency standards, the Applicant is required to comply with the California Green
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 50
Building Standard Code requirements for energy efficient buildings and appliances as well as
utility energy efficiency programs implemented by Anaheim Public Utilities and Southern
California Gas Company.
Regarding AB 1493 regulations, an individual project does not have the ability to comply or
conflict with these regulations because they are intended for agencies and their adoption of
procedures and protocols for reporting and certifying GHG emission reductions from mobile
sources. However, the vehicles associated with the Proposed Project would be required to
comply with federal and State fuel efficiency standards.
Regarding the State’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, the Proposed Project would be
required to meet or exceed the energy standards established in the California Green Building
Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen). CALGreen Standards require that new buildings
reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system
efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish
materials.
The Proposed Project would provide for, and promote, energy efficiencies required under other
applicable federal and State standards and regulations, and in so doing would meet or exceed all
California Building Standards Code Title 24 standards. Energy consumed by the Proposed
Project’s operation is calculated to be comparable to, or less than, energy consumed by other
residential uses of similar scale and intensity that are constructed and operating in California. On
this basis, the project would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption
of energy. Impacts are considered to be less than significant and no further environmental
analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and No. 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Appendix A – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact
Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 5.2, Chapter 5.2, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, Pages 5.2-1 to 5.2-28.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 51
5.4.7 Geology and Soils
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Directly or indirectly cause
potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or
based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines
and Geology Special
Publication 42.
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
ii. Strong seismic ground
shaking?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
iii. Seismic-related ground
failure, including
liquefaction?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
iv. Landslides?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
c) Be located on a geologic unit or
soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a
result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-
site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 52
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase in
Impact Severity
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or property?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the use
of septic tanks or alternative
waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available
for the disposal of waste water?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a
unique paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature?
Less Than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the geotechnical and soils impacts related to the implementation of the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.5.4 concluded that buildout of the
General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to geology and soils upon
implementation of General Plan goals and policies, existing codes and regulations, and MM
5.5-1 in MMP No. 122.
No areas of the City are identified on an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. However,
build-out of the General Plan has the potential to expose future residents to the effects of
geological hazards including ground shaking, seismically induced surface rupture, liquefaction,
and slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides. EIR No. 330 concluded that potential
impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be reduced to less than significant levels with
compliance with the General Plan Goals and Policies; the applicable requirements listed in the
Anaheim Municipal Code; and with conformance to the California Building Code.
As noted in EIR No. 330, although the majority of the City and its Sphere-of-Influence has flat
topography and minimal potential for erosion impacts and landslides. Although the Hill and
Canyon Area exhibits hilly terrain that is more susceptible to soil erosion and landslides, this area
of the City is not proximate to the Project Site. Development would be subject to local and State
codes and requirements for erosion control and grading. In addition, project sites encompassing
an area of one or more acres would require compliance with a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit and consequently the development and implementation of a
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). With adherence to these codes and regulations
and implementation of the General Plan Goals and Policies, Title 17 – Land Development and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 53
Resources, and the most recent version of the Uniform Building Code, impacts would be reduced
to below a level of significance.
With the exception of the Hill and Canyon Area, soils observed and encountered throughout the
remainder of the City range from “Low” to “High” in expansion potential (Expansivity Potential
of Soils and Rock Units in Orange County, California, 1976). Proposed structures should be
designed for the appropriate expansion potential and impacts would be less than significant.
Impacts to paleontological features was previously discussed in the Cultural Resources section of
EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346. One geologic formation – the Topanga Formation – has a high
potential for yielding paleontological material and grading there, as well as in other formations,
would be closely monitored. Buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant
impacts related to paleontological resources with the implementation of MM 5.4-2 in MMP No.
122. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded the buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would
result in no new or increased significant impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330. No new
mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping.
Geologically, the surficial sediments across the Proposed Project are mapped as Holocene and
late Pleistocene young alluvial fan deposits, consisting of unconsolidated silty, sandy alluvium
(Morton and Miller 2006). Holocene deposits are estimated to be approximately 130 feet thick
in the area of the Proposed Project (Sprotte et al., 1980). During the Holocene, activity of the
Santa Ana River points to widespread sheet flooding and wandering, as indicated by extensive
and continuous “younger” sand and silt deposits (Greenwood and Pridmore 2001).
As required by MM 5.5-1, the Applicant prepared a Geotechnical due diligence study (Appendix
C). The study confirmed that the Project Site is underlain by alluvial deposits which predominately
consist of fine to medium grained sand with trace fines in the upper 50 feet. Groundwater was
not encountered during exploration at depths of 50 feet below existing grade.
The Project Site is not located within a fault-rupture hazard zone as defined by the Alquist-Priolo
Special Studies Zones Act (CGS, 2018). Also, based on mapping by the State, there are no active
faults mapped at the site. The closest major Quaternary-age faults include the Peralta Hills Fault
located 1.4 miles to the east and the Yorba Linda Fault located 1.7 miles north of the site. The
closest active faults are the Puente Hills Blind Thrust and the Whittier Faults located 5 and 7 miles
north of the site, respectively. These faults along with numerous other regionally active faults are
capable of producing strong ground shaking at the Project Site.
The Project Site is not located within a mapped potential liquefaction hazard zone per the
California Division of Mines and Geology Seismic Hazard Maps for the Anaheim Quadrangle
(California Division of Mines and Geology, 1998). Based on the site-specific geotechnical
exploration and considering the absence of groundwater in the upper 50 feet, the potential for
liquefaction at the Project Site is considered very low.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 54
Tsunami and seiche are not considered hazards at the Project Site due to the flat elevation and
the distance of the site from the ocean. No confined bodies of water are located immediately
adjacent to the site.
The anticipated settlements depend upon the loads from the building, the type of building
foundation and the geotechnical properties of the supporting subgrade. Per the laboratory test
results and the blow counts within the subsurface soils, the seismically induced settlement as a
result of strong ground shaking is anticipated to be minor and less than ½-inch.
The loss or gain of volume (shrinkage or bulking, respectively) of excavated materials compacted
as fill varies according to earth material/type and location. This volume change is represented as
a percentage of shrinkage (for volume loss) or bulking (for volume gain) after recompaction of a
unit volume. The near-surface undocumented fill and native alluvium on the Project Site are
anticipated to have approximately 5 to 15 percent shrinkage. Subsidence is anticipated to be on
the order of 0.1 foot across the site.
The Proposed Project will connect to existing City water, sewer, and stormwater systems. The
use of a septic or alternative wastewater system is not proposed.
Appendix C provides recommendations for site preparation activities based on the results of field
observations and exploratory borings. Among the recommendations are over-excavation and
compaction of existing soils below footings; on-site soils were found to be suitable for reuse as
engineered fill. The Project Site’s soils were found to have very low expansion potential and low
sulfate content and were determined to be mildly corrosive to buried ferrous metals.
As required by MM 5.4-1, the Project Site was also evaluated for paleontological resources in
Appendix B. The paleontological sensitivity of the Holocene alluvial sediments in the drainage
valleys is low, based upon the general lack of fossils preserved in these types of deposits, and
their young geologic age. Within the coastal plains of Orange County, young alluvial fan
sediments rarely produce terrestrial vertebrate fossils. Young alluvial fan sedimentary deposits,
such as those at the project, are typically assigned a low paleontological sensitivity.
As addressed above, the Proposed Project would result in less than significant geological and
paleontological impacts with the implementation of standard City requirements and mitigation
measures and would not introduce impacts that have not already been analyzed in EIR No. 330
and SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that the application of
uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no
further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP Geo-1: All grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code, Title 17 – Land Development and Resources.
PPP Geo-2: The Property Owner/Developer shall submit for approval to the State Water
Resources Control Board, a Notice of Intent to be covered under the Storm Water Permit, in
compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. In
addition, future projects shall be required to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which incorporates Best Management Practices (BMPs).
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 55
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.4-2: City staff shall require property owners/developers to provide studies to document
the presence/absence of archaeological and/or paleontological resources for areas with
documented or inferred resource presence. On properties where resources are identified, such
studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery
and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
The requirement for archaeological and paleontological resources documentations set
forth in this mitigation measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Cultural
and Biological Due Diligence Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix B).
Consequently, no further action is required.
MM 5.5-1: The City shall require geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential
seismic or geologic hazards as part of the environmental or development review process. All
grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in
the applicable geotechnical investigation.
The requirement for a geotechnical investigation set forth in this mitigation measure
has been satisfied by the completion of the Geotechnical Exploration and Due Diligence
Study (Appendix C). Proof of intent to comply with these operations, such as applicable
notes on plans, shall be provided by the property owner/developer prior to issuance of
grading permits.
Sources:
Appendix B – Results of a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study for the 2420 East
Lincoln Avenue Project, APNs 083-731-18 and -19, Orange County, California, Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc., rev. November 18, 2022.
Appendix C – Geotechnical Exploration and Due Diligence Study, Proposed Residential
Development at 2420 and 2450 East Lincoln Avenue, City of Anaheim, California, NMG
Geotechnical, Inc., September 3, 2021.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.5, Geology and Soils, Pages 5-57 to 5-84.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-5 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 31.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 56
5.4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
• Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
Potentially New or
Increased
Significant Effect
☐ ☒
• Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for
the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Potentially New or
Increased
Significant Effect
☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330, prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Project, did not evaluate greenhouse
gas (GHG) emissions impacts because this impact area was not included in the CEQA Guidelines
Appendix G checklist and the City did not have adopted GHG thresholds at the time of
preparation.
In 2013, the Anaheim City Council certified Supplemental EIR No. 346 as a supplemental EIR to
EIR No. 330. S EIR No. 346 was prepared to serve as environmental documentation for the
Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project. In accordance with the amendments to the CEQA
Guidelines, inventories were compiled to forecast GHG emissions generated by the General Plan
and Zoning Code Update Project (analyzed by EIR No. 330), as well as the Housing Opportunities
Sites Rezoning Project (analyzed by Supplemental EIR No. 346).
As identified in Section 5.2 of Supplemental EIR No. 346, the GHG emissions associated with
build-out of the General Plan as described by the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Project
and the Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project would exceed the SCAQMD’s GHG
efficiency threshold. Mitigation measures from EIR No. 330 along with new mitigation measures
prepared for Supplemental EIR No. 346 were proposed to reduce these impacts to the extent
feasible; however, even with mitigation the impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.
The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this
potential impact.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. The Applicant
prepared a Greenhouse Gas analysis (Appendix A).
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 57
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
Ganddini Group analyzed the net increase of GHG emissions, which results in 1,189.14 metric
tons per year, which is below the interim screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year
recommended by SCAQMD for non-industrial projects and a net decrease of 27.14 metric tons
per year from the existing office use. As illustrated in Table 5, the Proposed Project would not
exceed the SCAQMD’s significance thresholds for GHG emissions for residential developments.
As previously noted, SEIR No. 346 determined that the buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites
would result in significant and unavoidable impacts related to GHG emissions. As illustrated
above, the Proposed Project would not result in a significant impact when related to the
applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. As such, the Proposed Project would not introduce
impacts that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed or that are more significant than
previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially
mitigate; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing
the emissions of greenhouse gases? Supplemental EIR No. 346 compared emissions to the CARB
Table 5 - Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)
Bio-CO2 NonBio-
CO2 CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Maximum Annual
Operations 2.95 1,127.00 1,130.00 0.37 0.03 1,151.00
Construction1 0.00 37.7.81 37.81 0.00 0.00 38.14
Subtotal Emissions 2.95 1,164.81 1,167.81 0.37 0.03 1,189.14
Reduction from
existing office uses to
be removed
-7.84 -1,120.00 -1,128.00 -0.87 -0.04 -1,162.00
Total Emissions -4.89 44.81 39.81 -0.50 -0.01 27.14
SCAQMD Draft
Screening Threshold 3,000
Exceeds Threshold? No
Notes:
Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1 for Opening Year 2026.
(1) Construction GHG emissions CO2e based on a 30-year amortization rate.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 58
Climate Change 2008 Scoping Plan as the most current plan at the time of publishing in 2013.
CARB updated the Scoping Plan in 2017. As demonstrated in the consistency analysis provided in
the Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis prepared by Ganddini Group,
the proposed project would comply with all applicable portions of the 2017 Scoping Plan Update.
Table 12 of the Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact Analysis (Appendix A)
provides further details on the proposed project’s compliance with the 2017 Scoping Plan.
SEIR No. 346 determined that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would not conflict with
any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. As
illustrated above, the Proposed P roject would not result in a conflict with the 2017 Scoping Plan,
the applicable GHG emission reduction plan. As such, the Proposed Project would not introduce
impacts that SEIR No. 346 has not already analyzed or that are more significant than previously
analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate;
therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
See MMs 5.2-1 and 5.2-6 in Section III, Air Quality.
Sources:
Appendix A – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Air Quality, Global Climate Change, and Energy Impact
Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 5.2, Chapter 5.2, Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, Pages 5.2-1 to 5.2-28.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 59
5.4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
a) Create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment
through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment
through reasonably
foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving
the release of hazardous
materials into the
environment?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
c) Emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an
existing or proposed school?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) Be located on a site which is
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a
significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
e) For a project located within an
airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the
project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in
the project area?
Less than
Significant After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 60
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
f) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
g) Expose people or structures,
either directly or indirectly, to
a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland
fires?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the hazards and hazardous materials impacts related to the implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. Overall, the General Plan and Zoning Code
Update decreases the area of land designated for heavy industrial uses and therefore reduces
the future number of potential emitters or handlers of hazardous materials, substances, or waste
throughout the City. EIR No. 330, Section 5.6.4 concluded that buildout of the General Plan would
result in less than significant impacts with mitigation related to hazards and hazardous materials
upon implementation of General Plan goals and policies, existing codes and regulations, and
MMs
5.6-1 through 5.6-3 in MMP No. 122. SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing
Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased significant impacts than those identified
in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping.
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
and
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared (Appendix D). The Phase I ESA did
not identify any Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), Historical Recognized
Environmental Conditions (HRECs),or Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs)
associated with the Project Site in accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. A
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 61
separate hazardous materials inspection (Appendix D-1) was performed to identify potential
hazardous materials on site that would be disturbed as part of the demolition of the existing
commercial office buildings. Materials identified include asbestos-containing materials (ACM),
lead containing paint, fluorescent light tubes, and electronics such as computers, which require
handling or disposal practices outside of conventional solid waste. Only individuals and/or
contractors who have undergone all required training, licensing, and certifications in accordance
with all applicable federal, State, and local rules and regulations should be utilized for handling
and/or removal of the identified materials as addressed in PPP Haz-1.
During construction, limited quantities of hazardous substances, including oils, gasoline, diesel
fuels, automotive chemicals, and other substances would be used on the project site. However,
the use of these materials would be limited to the construction period. The handling, transport,
and disposal of such substances must comply with all local, State, and federal laws and
regulations (PPP Haz-1). Any hazardous materials utilized during the construction of the
residences and other site improvements would be managed in accordance with State and local
regulations, as implemented through grading and building permit requirements. This includes
preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to avoid pollution of surface
water during storm events. During the operational phase of the residential development, no
significant quantities of hazardous materials would be used, and no hazardous emissions would
be generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, impacts associated with the transport, use,
and disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant and no further environmental
analysis is required.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,
or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
The nearest school to the project site is Sunkist Elementary School, located at 500 N. Sunkist
Street, Anaheim, approximately 0.6 mile north of the Project Site. The use of hazardous materials
would be limited to the construction period, and the handling, transport, and disposal of such
substances must comply with all local, State, and federal laws and regulations. Therefore, impacts
would be less than significant and no further environmental analysis is required.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
The Project Site is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the
Government Code.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in
a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
The Proposed Project is not in the vicinity of any airport or airstrip. The nearest airport is Fullerton
Municipal Airport, located approximately 5.5 miles from the Project Site. The Project Site is not
located within an air influence or hazard planning area associated with Fullerton Municipal
Airport, and there are no foreseeable hazards for people residing at the Project Site related to
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 62
airport safety hazards or noise. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no further
environmental analysis is required.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
The Proposed Project is subject to building code and fire code requirements, including the
requirement for fire sprinklers, and access roads are subject to Anaheim Fire and Rescue
Department design review for emergency response and evacuation needs. Therefore, the
Proposed Project would not impair or interfere with emergency response or evacuation.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no further environmental analysis is
required.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
The proposed project is located in an urbanized area in the central portion of Anaheim and is not
adjacent to or near the Hill or Canyon areas or other wildland areas that are susceptible to
wildfires. The project site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as determined
by Program EIR No. 330. Furthermore, the proposed project is subject to building code and fire
code requirements, including the requirement for fire sprinklers, and the project would be
subject to Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department design review. The proposed project would not
have any significant impacts related to wildland fires that EIR No. 330 and SEIR 346 have not
already analyzed, nor would the proposed project have any impacts that are more significant
than previously analyzed, or that the application of uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP Haz-1: The Proposed Project shall comply with all relevant local, State, and federal
regulations related to hazardous materials.
PPP Haz-2: Prior to structural demolition/renovation activities, a Certified Environmental
Professional shall confirm the presence or absence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs).
Should ACMs be present, demolition materials containing ACMs shall be removed and disposed
of at an appropriate permitted facility. Asbestos removal shall be performed by a State certified
asbestos containment contractor in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403.
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Appendix D – Phase I Environmental Assessment, 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Hillman Consulting, August 31, 2021.
Appendix D-1 – Hazardous Materials Inspection, 2420-2450 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim,
California 92806, Hillman Consulting, September 1, 2021.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 63
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Pages
7-5 to 7-6 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 32-33.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 64
5.4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Violate any water quality standards
or waste discharge requirements
or otherwise substantially degrade
surface or ground water quality?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater
recharge such the project may
impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream
or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would:
i. result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site;
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
ii. substantially increase the rate
or amount of surface runoff in
a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite;
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
iii. create or contribute runoff
water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted
runoff; or
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
iv. impede or redirect flood flows? Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche
zones, risk release of pollutants
due to project inundation?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 65
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the hydrology and water quality impacts related to the implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.7.4 concluded that with
implementation of General Plan goals and policies, existing codes and regulations, and MMs
5.7-1 through 5.7-3 in MMP No. 122, buildout of the General Plan would result in less than
significant impacts related to hydrology and water quality. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded
that the buildout of the Housing Opportunity Site would not result in new or greater significant
impacts than those identified in Program EIR No. 330. No new mitigation measures were required
in MMP No. 122A.
According to EIR No. 330, implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update would
potentially impact the quantity of runoff and other pollutant loadings to receiving waters.
Impacts may be significantly greater during the region’s rainy season, which was generally
defined as October through May. Policies included in the General Plan and Zoning Code Update
would ensure compliance with federal standards by ensuring adequate storm drainage and
maintaining adequate water and waste distribution capacity.
The City receives up to three-fourths of its drinking water from local groundwater; therefore, it
is critical to protect the Orange County Groundwater Basin. This groundwater basin underlies the
northern half of Orange County, covering approximately 310 square miles, and has a recharge
area which extends north and east of the SR-57/SR-91 interchange to the SR-91 and Imperial
Highway interchange. The recharge area represents two-thirds of the total groundwater recharge
in Orange County. Implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update would not
potentially increase the demand on groundwater supplies. To protect the City’s groundwater and
the Orange County Groundwater Basin, the General Plan and Zoning Code Update contains
policies directing the City to reduce pollution, enforce water quality management regulations,
and conserve water.
Increased development throughout Anaheim and its Sphere-of -influence, especially on currently
undeveloped properties, will increase the number of impervious surfaces, thereby increasing the
amount and speed of runoff. Increased runoff volumes and speeds may create nuisance flooding
in areas without adequate drainage facilities. Mitigation measures related to the maintenance of
flood control facilities and minimizing stormwater and urban runoff will avoid or substantially
lessen potentially significant impacts to a less-than-significant level.
Pollution associated with storm water and urban runoff affects the groundwater of Anaheim, as
well as neighboring jurisdictions, throughout the region. The problem is particularly acute at the
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 66
beginning of a heavy rainstorm but can be a problem at any time due to the improper disposal
of products associated with home, garden, and automotive maintenance. However, the General
Plan incorporates various goals and policies which would limit potential impacts relating to water
quality. The General Plan and Zoning Code Update seeks to protect water quality by requiring
residents and businesses to engage in water quality management practices and pollution control
measures. The General Plan Goals and Policies also direct the City to monitor water quality and
provide water service that meets or exceeds health standards.
Build-out in accordance with the General Plan could potentially expose more people and
habitable structures to potential flooding and flood hazards. Increased exposure could occur
through development of lands within flood zones. The policies contained in the General Plan seek
to protect structures and residents within flood zones by requiring all development proposals to
undergo an evaluation process to determine flood risks and ensure compliance with local State
and Federal regulations.
There is a low-to-moderate potential for flooding due to seiche hazards affecting properties
adjacent to the Walnut Canyon Reservoir, an enclosed body of water in the Anaheim Hills. The
Project Site is not proximate to this area. The City of Anaheim is not located close enough to the
coast to be subject to possible impacts from a tsunami.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
The Proposed Project would be subject to standard regulatory requirements that would minimize
impacts related to hydrology and water quality, including preparation of a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for
operations, each of which would contain best management practices (BMPs).
MM 5.7-2 requires that the Applicant conduct a drainage study to identify potential deficiencies
in an existing storm drain facility or discharges into an existing deficient facility. The Applicant
has prepared a Drainage Study (Appendix F), which found that the Proposed Project can be
constructed and meet all requirements of the County of Orange to manage flooding for a 25-year
storm event and that all impacts would remain less than significant.
MM 5.7-3 requires that the Applicant prepare a WQMP to conform with the City’s NPDES
requirements. The Applicant has prepared a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan
(PWQMP) (Appendix E). The Project Site is developed with approximately 86 percent impervious
surfaces and 14 percent pervious surfaces. Build-out of the Proposed Project, as shown in Figure
3, Conceptual Site Plan, would result in approximately 82 percent impervious surfaces and 18
percent pervious landscaped areas, which would enhance on-site infiltration of storm water and
reduce off-site storm flows from the current condition.
The proposed site condition will have similar drainage patterns to the exiting condition except
for a portion of runoff conveyed into a proposed BMP feature and infiltrated into the substrata.
For the majority of the Project Site, runoff generated would be directed into ribbon gutters and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 67
curb and gutters and conveyed into a number of storm drain inlets. A storm drain network is
proposed to convey the runoff from the inlets into a subsurface StormTech infiltration system
(BMP 1). The storm drain network is design such that flows in excess of the StormTech BMP
capacity would be conveyed directly to the existing curb inlet located adjacent to the Project Site
along Lincoln Avenue. Runoff from approximately the front half of the structures along Lincoln
Avenue and Sunkist Avenue (i.e., the half of the structure facing Lincoln Avenue or Sunkist Street)
would be collected in a storm drain network and conveyed into either a subsurface StormTech
chamber system (BMP 2) or bioretention basins (BMPs 3 and 4). Runoff in excess of the capacities
of BMPs 2, 3, and 4 would be conveyed to the existing curb inlet adjacent to the Project Site along
Lincoln Avenue. The above-mentioned BMP system is designed to capture and infiltrate the 85th
percentile rainfall on the project. As addressed above, the Proposed Project would result in less
than significant water quality impacts with the implementation of standard City requirements
and mitigation measures and would not introduce impacts that have not already been analyzed
in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that the
application of uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate.
Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
The Project Site is developed and does not represent a substantial groundwater recharging area.
Anaheim Public Utilities would provide water supply to the Project Site through the City’s
municipal water distribution system. Although groundwater would be used for water supply, the
Proposed Project would not require on-site extraction of groundwater during operation. The
Proposed Project would comply with the policies and goals of the General Plan and the
development standards of the Zoning Code, except as requested for modification by the
Proposed Project, which would ensure that the Proposed P roject would not increase demand on
groundwater supplies beyond those analyzed in the Certified EIRs. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would not have any significant impacts related to groundwater recharge or groundwater
supplies that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project result
in more significant or more severe impacts that uniformly applicable development policies could
not substantially mitigate. No further environmental analysis is required.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner
which would:
(i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site;
The Project Site is not near any natural waterway and would not cause erosion or siltation due
to a change in the course of a stream. According to the Drainage Study prepared for the Proposed
Project (Appendix F), the site currently contains approximately 86 percent impervious surfaces
and 14 percent pervious surfaces. Buildout of the Proposed Project would provide approximately
82 percent impervious surfaces and 18 percent pervious surfaces. The Proposed Project would
not have any significant impacts related impacts related to erosion or siltation that the Certified
EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project result in more significant or more
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 68
severe impacts that could not be substantially mitigated by the application of uniformly
applicable development policies. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
(ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site;
and
(iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;
and
(iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
According to the Drainage Study prepared for the Proposed Project (Appendix F), the existing site
hydrologic condition was analyzed to determine the peak flow rates associated with 10-, 25- and
100-year storm events. The 25-year storm event results indicate the Proposed Project will result
in a slight increase in peak flow rate (13.5 cfs compared to 11.8 cfs) in the post-project condition
in comparison to the existing condition. Therefore, as a part of the Proposed Project, on-site
detention consisting of a system of 24 StormTech SC-310 units with a total storage of 1,120 cubic
feet would be provided to preclude 25-year storm event peak flow impacts. The Proposed Project
would not have any significant impacts related to runoff or flood flows that EIR No. 330 has not
already analyzed, nor would the P roposed Project result in more significant or more severe
impacts than previously analyzed, or that the application of uniformly applicable development
policies would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is
required.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
The Project Site is also not within a 100-year flood hazard area or area affected by seiche,
tsunami, or mudflow due to the elevation and the distance of the site from the ocean. No
confined bodies of water are located immediately adjacent to the site. The Proposed Project
would not have any significant impacts related to flood hazards, tsunami, or seiches that the
Certified EIRs have not already analyzed has not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed
Project result in more significant or more severe impacts that uniformly applicable development
policies could not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is
required.
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
The Proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality
control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. The Proposed Project would comply
with the applicable General Plan Goals and Policies and mitigation measures. The Proposed
Project would not have any significant impacts related to a water quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater management plan that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed,
nor would the Proposed Project result in more significant or more severe impacts that uniformly
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 69
applicable development policies could not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP HYD-1: The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with all applicable local, State, and
federal regulations relating hydrology and water quality.
Applicable MM No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.7-2: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the City shall require that new developments
conduct a drainage study and mitigate its drainage impacts if the development creates a
deficiency in an existing storm drain facility or discharges to an existing deficient facility.
The requirement for a drainage study set forth in this mitigation measure has been
satisfied by the completion of the project-specific drainage study (Appendix F).
MM 5.7-3: Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the City shall require that new developments
and/or significant redevelopments prepare a Final Water Quality Management Plan to be
reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and conform to the City’s National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) related requirements to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
The requirement for a Water Quality Management Plan set forth in this mitigation
measure has been conditionally satisfied by the completion of the project-specific
Preliminary WQMP (Appendix E).
Sources:
Appendix E – Santa Ana Region Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), 2420
East Lincon Avenue, October 4, 2022.
Appendix F – Drainage Study for 2420 East Lincoln Avenue Project, Rick Engineering Company,
October 3, 2022.
Appendix G – Sewer Study – 2420-2450 E. Lincon Avenue, PSOMAS, July 20, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.7, Hydrology and Water Quality, Pages 5-105 to 5-131.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-2 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 33-35.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 70
5.4.11 Land Use and Planning
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Physically divide an established
community?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any
land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental
effect?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the land use impacts related to the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.8.4 concluded that buildout of the General Plan
would result in less than significant impacts related to land use and planning upon
implementation of General Plan goals and policies and existing codes and regulations. No
mitigation measure were required in MMP No. 122. SEIR 346 concluded that buildout of the
Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased significant impacts than those
identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.The
General Plan Land Use Plan (Figure LU-4 of the General Plan Land Use Element), along with the
General Plan Goals and Policies, strive to preserve, revitalize, and ensure land use compatibility
throughout the City. The General Plan identifies areas for smaller lot, multi-family, and mixed-
use development by strategically locating these uses and limiting designations within and
adjacent to single-family neighborhoods, as well as providing additional guidance under the
Community Design Element to ensure quality development and integration with surrounding
areas.
The Land Use Plan provides the basis for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and
represents a guide for the City future development. The land use patterns and areas identified
are intended to provide the basis for more detailed land use designations, densities and
development standards established in the Zoning Code. The Land Use Plan provides enough
dwelling unit, population, and employment capacity to exceed the OCP-2000 census-based
projections for the year 2025. In addition, the General Plan complies with the provisions of the
NCCP/HCP for the Central/Coastal Sub-region.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 71
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
and
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. The Project Site is
developed with a commercial use and redevelopment would not divide an established
community. The Project Site was reclassified to the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone in
the Rezoning Project, which as analyzed in SEIR No. 346. The Rezoning Project was a part of the
City’s effort to facilitate development on properties identified as Opportunity Sites in the Housing
Element. The Proposed Project’s land use is consistent with the Project Site’s existing Medium
Density Residential General Plan designations and implements the RO Overlay Zone. The
Proposed Project would also implement the City’s vision for this Opportunity Site by adding more
housing to the southeast area of the City. There is no applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan affecting the Project Site.
The Proposed Project does not have any significant effects on the environment that either have
not already been analyzed in the Certified EIRs or that are more significant than previously
analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate,
therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.8, Land Use and Relevant Planning, Pages 5-133 to 5-158.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-7 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 35.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 72
5.4.12 Mineral Resources
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the mineral resources impacts related to the implementation of the General Plan
and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.9.4 concluded that buildout of the
General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to mineral resources upon
implementation of General Plan goals and policies and existing codes and regulations. No impacts
were identified, and no mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122. SEIR No. 346
concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased
significant impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were
required in MMP No.122A.
The State of California designates one MRZ-20 area and three specific areas of regionally
significant mineral resources within the City. These areas are not proximate to the Project Site.
Changes in land use resulting from implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update
would not significantly impact mineral resources in the MRZ-2 area because land in this area is
largely built out or already planned for development.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the State?
and
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of a commercial office site and construction of 83
residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. There are no regionally
significant mineral resource areas on or proximate to the Project Site. The Proposed Project
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 73
would not impact any parcels other than those analyzed in the Certified EIRs and would therefore
not have the potential to impact mineral resources beyond those previously analyzed.
The Proposed Project does not have any significant effects on the environment that either have
not already been analyzed in the Certified EIRs or that are more significant than previously
analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate,
therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.9, Mineral Resources, Pages 5-159 to 5-164.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-2 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 35-36.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 74
5.4.13 Noise
Would the project result in: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in
EIR No.
330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Generation of a substantial
temporary or permanent increase
in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other
agencies?
Significant
Unavoidable Adverse
Impact
☐ ☒
b) Generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
Less than Significant ☐ ☒
c) For a project located within the
vicinity of a private airstrip or an
airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
Less than Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the noise impacts related to the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.10.4 concluded that short-term construction noise
as well as other long-term operational noise sources such as events, railroad and aircraft activity
would not result in significant noise and vibration impacts. However, the EIR No. 330 noise
analysis concluded that noise sensitive uses along several roadways would experience a
substantial noise increase in excess of 65 dBA CNEL. Mitigation measures required by MMP No.
122 would reduce these potential noise impacts. Implementation of the proposed General Plan
goals and policies, existing codes and regulations, and mitigation measures would reduce all
potential short-term and long-term noise impacts to the extent feasible. However, even with
implementation of mitigation measures and General Plan goals and policies, many roadways
within the City would generate significant noise impacts. As a result, in locations where these
roadways are adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the impacts related to traffic noise would
remain significant. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for this
impact.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 75
Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would not
result in new or greater significant impacts than those identified in Program EIR No. 330. No new
mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Short-term noise impacts are impacts associated with demolition, site preparation, grading, and
construction of the proposed land uses. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during
construction. First, the transport of workers and movement of materials to and from the Project
Site could incrementally increase noise levels along local access roads The second type of short-
term noise impact is related to noise generated at the job site during demolition, site preparation,
grading, and/or physical construction.
The major source of noise in the City is from traffic traveling on its various roadways and
freeways, including the I-5, SR-91, SR-55, SR-57, SR-241, Beach Boulevard (SR-39), and Imperial
Highway (SR-90). Vehicles traveling on these routes have the potential to produce noise impacts
on future development within the City of Anaheim. Implementation of the General Plan Goals
and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and mitigation measures will reduce potential short-
term and long-term noise impacts to the extent feasible. However, many of the roadways in the
City are expected to generate noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. In locations where these
roadways are adjacent to existing sensitive land uses, the impacts are anticipated to remain
significant. This is considered a significant and unavoidable adverse impact, and the Anaheim City
Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
An aspect of construction is its accompanying vibration. Excessive groundborne vibration is
typically caused by activities such as blasting or the use of pile drivers during construction.
However, these impacts would be assessed at the time specific development applications are
submitted.
The Fullerton Municipal Airport is located approximately 2 miles away from Anaheim. In the most
current data available, the airport projected a maximum of 265,500 total operations for year
2000. However, the 65 CNEL Noise Contour for Fullerton Airport does not extend into the City of
Anaheim and no significant impacts are anticipated. Several heliports within the City of Anaheim
are utilized for helicopter take-off and landing. There are no private airstrips within the City.
Implementation of the General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and
mitigation measures will reduce potential noise impacts from these sources.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Result in the generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise
levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. The Applicant has
prepared a Noise Impact Analysis (Appendix H). The analysis concluded the Proposed Project
would result in no new significant impacts and no new mitigation measures were identified.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 76
Off-Site Traffic Noise Analysis
The Proposed Project includes demolition of 56,274 square feet of existing office uses and
redevelopment of the Project Site with 83 three-story townhome dwelling units. The Trip
Generation Analysis prepared for the Proposed Project by Ganddini Group (August 23, 2022)
showed that the Proposed Project, when compared to traffic generated by the existing office
uses, would result in a net decrease of approximately 12 vehicle trips per day with a net decrease
of 46 trips during the AM peak hour and a net decrease of 34 trips during the PM peak hour.
Typically, a doubling of traffic volumes is required to result in an increase of 3 dBA, which is
considered to be a barely audible change. At a net decrease of 12 daily vehicle trips, the project-
generated trips will not result in a doubling of traffic volumes along any affected road segment.
This impact would be less than significant. No mitigation is required.
Exterior Noise Analysis
The City of Anaheim General Plan Noise Element (N-8) identifies exterior noise levels between
65 and 70 dBA CNEL as “conditionally acceptable” in private patios or balconies that are greater
than 6 feet deep of single-family attached and multi-family residential units. The General Plan
Noise Element (Page N-8) notes that exterior noise levels are to be attained in “habitable”
exterior areas and need not encompass the entirety of a property. Special consideration should
be given in the case of infill projects located along the City’s arterial corridors or railroad lines for
exemption from the requirements of the exterior noise level standards (Table N-3), in order to
achieve an appropriate balance between providing a quality living environment and attractive
project design. Three proposed buildings have exterior patios facing Lincoln Avenue. Exterior
noise levels at these patios will range between 69 and 70 dBA CNEL and would comply with the
“normally acceptable” ambient noise levels adopted in the General Plan Noise Element. The
Project would also be required to comply with the requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code
Section 18.40.090 related to interior and exterior noise levels and required attenuation.
Per Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.40.090.050, exterior noise within common recreation
areas of any single-family attached or multi-family dwelling project must be attenuated to a
maximum of 65 dB CNEL. Common recreation areas proposed for active outdoor use are provided
in between the proposed buildings and will not be exposed to noise levels that exceed 65 dBA
CNEL. Impacts related to exterior noise levels at the Project Site would be less than significant.
Interior Noise Analysis
The General Plan Noise Element interior noise level standard is 45 dBA CNEL. Future traffic noise
levels are expected to reach 71 dBA CNEL at the façade of the closest proposed residential
dwelling units to Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. For proposed windows and sliding glass
doors that would be exposed to exterior noise levels that exceed 65 dBA CNEL, upgraded
windows would be utilized to ensure that vehicle noise does not result in interior noise levels
that exceed 45 dBA CNEL. Implementation of the design measure below will avoid significant
impacts related to interior noise levels.
Construction Noise
Construction noise represents a short-term increase on the ambient noise levels. Construction-
related noise levels are expected to create temporary and intermittent high-level noise
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 77
conditions at sensitive receptors surrounding the Project Site. Modeled unmitigated construction
noise levels reached up to 71.5 dBA Leq at the nearest multi-family residential property line to
the west, 73.5 dBA Leq at the nearest single-family residential property line to the north, 66.7
dBA Leq at the nearest multi-family residential property line to the northeast, 69.1 dBA Leq at
the nearest multi-family residential property line to the southeast, and 78.5 dBA Leq at the
nearest single-family residential property line to the south of the Project Site.
Construction noise sources are regulated within the City of Anaheim under Section 6.70.010 of
the City’s Municipal Code which exempts construction activities from the noise standards
between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM.
The City of Anaheim has not adopted a numerical threshold that identifies what a substantial
increase would be. For purposes of this analysis, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit
Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (2018) criteria would be used to establish significance
thresholds. For residential uses, the daytime noise threshold is 80 dBA Leq averaged over an 8-
hour period (Leq (8-hr); and the nighttime noise threshold is 70 dBA Leq (8-hr). For commercial
uses, the daytime and nighttime noise threshold is 85 dBA Leq (8-hr). In compliance with the
City’s Code, construction would not occur during the noise-sensitive nighttime hours. Impacts
would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required.
As addressed above, the Proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts related to
noise and would not introduce impacts that have not already been analyzed in EIR No. 330 and
SEIR No. 346 or that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that the application of
uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no
further environmental analysis is required.
b) Result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the
equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures, and soil type. peak particle
velocity (PPV) level of 0.3 in/sec is generally accepted as the threshold at which there is a risk to
“architectural” damage to older residential structures and a PPV level of 0.5 in/sec as the
threshold at which there is a risk to “architectural” damage to modern industrial/commercial
buildings. If a vibratory roller is used within 20 feet of an existing structure or if a large bulldozer
is used within 12 feet of an existing structure, there would be some potential for this equipment
to result in architectural damage and significant impacts (California Department of
Transportation, 2020). A best management practice limiting the use of a vibratory roller within
20 feet or a large bulldozer within 12 feet of the existing residential structures to the south and
west of the Project Site would be implemented to avoid significant impacts.
Groundborne vibration becomes strongly perceptible to sensitive receptors at a level of 0.1 PPV.
Operation of a vibratory roller may result in groundborne vibration levels of up to 0.1 PPV at a
distance of 41 feet and a large bulldozer at a distance of 23 feet. Therefore, project construction
could cause annoyance to the residential uses to the south and west of the Project Site. However,
annoyance would be short-term and will occur only during site grading and preparation which
would be limited to daytime hours. Vibration impacts would be less than significant and no
further environmental analysis is required.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 78
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
As previously addressed, the 65 CNEL Noise Contour for Fullerton Airport does not extend into
the City of Anaheim and no impacts are anticipated. Several heliports within the City of Anaheim
are utilized for helicopter take-off and landing. There are no private airstrips within the City.
Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur, and no further environmental analysis is
required.
Project Design Feature:
PDF NOI-1: Windows and sliding glass doors on building elevations that will be exposed to
exterior noise levels that exceed 65 dBA CNEL, will be upgraded to ensure that vehicle noise does
not result in interior noise levels that exceed 45 dBA CNEL inside the residence.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP NOI-1: The following Best Management Practices, included as Conditions of Approval, would
reduce any noise level increases produced by the construction equipment to the nearby noise-
sensitive residential land uses:
• Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, the Property
Owner/Developer shall include a note on the plans indicating that noise-generating
Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00
p.m. on any day (City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.050.010). The Project
construction supervisor shall ensure compliance with the permitted construction hours.
• The Property Owner/Developer shall post a construction site notice near the
construction site access point or in an area that is clearly visible to the public. The notice
shall include the following: job site address; permit number, name, and phone number
of the contractor and owner; dates and duration of construction activities; construction
hours allowed; and the City of Anaheim and construction contractor phone numbers
where noise complaints can be reported and logged.
• Ongoing during construction, the Construction Contractors shall do all of the following:
o All construction equipment whether fixed or mobile, will be equipped with
properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturer
standards.
o All stationary construction equipment will be placed so that emitted noise is
directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project Site.
o As applicable, shut off all equipment when not in use.
o To the degree possible, equipment staging will be located in areas that create
the greatest distance between construction-related noise and vibration sources,
and sensitive receptors surrounding the Project Site.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 79
o Jackhammers, pneumatic equipment, and all other portable stationary noise
sources will be directed away and shielded from existing residences in the
vicinity of the Project Site. Either one-inch plywood or sound blankets can be
utilized for this purpose. They should reach up from the ground and block the
line of sight between equipment and existing residences. The shielding should
be without holes and cracks.
o No amplified music and/or voice will be allowed on the Project Site.
o Haul truck deliveries will not occur outside of the hours presented as exempt for
construction per City’s Municipal Code Section 6.70.010.
PPP NOI-2: A best management practice limiting the use of a vibratory roller within 20 feet or a
large bulldozer within 12 feet of the existing residential structures to the south and west of the
Project Site will be implemented to avoid significant impacts.
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Appendix H – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Noise Impact Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc., November
21, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.10, Noise, Pages 5-165 to 5-198.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 5.3, Noise, Page 5.3-1 through 5.3-
22; Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 36-37.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 80
5.4.14 Population and Housing
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Induce substantial unplanned
population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing people or housing,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR
No. 330 analyzed the population and housing impacts related to the implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.12.4 concluded that
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to population
and housing upon implementation of General Plan goals and policies, and existing codes and
regulations. No impacts were identified, and no mitigation measures were required in MMP
No. 122. SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in
no new or increased significant impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new
mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 112A.
Implementation of the General Plan provides opportunities to construct units housing units
within one of the State’s largest employment concentrations. Areas anticipated for additional
residential development include The Platinum Triangle and The Colony and Downtown Area.
The close proximity of the future housing units and employment opportunities responds
directly to the City’s jobs/housing balance policies.
Implementation of the General Plan, combined with other cumulative development in the area,
will result in a potential cumulative impact on employment, housing, and population. This
potential impact is considered substantial, but not adverse, in light of the Proposed Project’s
contribution to improved jobs/housing balance and transportation demand management
promoted by SCAG’s regional policies. Therefore, there are no significant unavoidable adverse
impacts related to population and housing.
The Project Site is identified as Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155 in the City’s 5th Cycle
(2014-2021) Housing Element with a maximum buildout of 139 residential units. The City of
Anaheim is currently seeking certification of the 6th Cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element. The
Proposed Project is included in the 6th Cycle Housing Element as Pipeline Project P-71.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 81
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
and
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction
of replacement housing elsewhere?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of a commercial office site and construction of
83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The General Plan
land use designation of the Project Site is Medium Density Residential. The Project Site is zoned
for General Commercial “C-G” uses and is within the Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay Zone.
The RO Zone provides “by-right” housing development opportunities consistent with a
property’s residential General Plan land use designation. The RO Overlay Zone is intended to
be applied to properties that are currently zoned and/or developed with non-residential uses
but designated for multiple-family residential uses by the City’s General Plan. The Overlay Zone
is further intended to serve as an implementation tool of the City’s Housing Element of the
General Plan by facilitating residential development on identified “housing opportunity sites.”
The maximum buildout of the Project Site, as listed in Table 3-2 of SEIR No. 346, is 139
residential units. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not induce population growth in the
area to a greater degree than was evaluated in the Certified EIRs. Removal of the existing
industrial use would not displace any people or housing.
The Proposed Project does not have any significant effects on the environment that either have
not already been analyzed in the Certified EIRs or that are more significant than previously
analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate,
therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.12, Population and Housing, Pages 5-203 to 5-212.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-7, and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 37.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 82
5.4.15 Public Services
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Police protection?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
c) Schools?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
d) Parks? Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
e) Other public facilities? Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the impacts on public services related to the implementation of the General Plan
and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330 determined development of the project area
would have a substantial demand for fire and police protection services and would indirectly
result in the demand for school services, parks, and libraries. EIR No. 330, Section 5.11.4
concluded that buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts to police
and fire protection upon implementation of MM 5.11-1 in MMP No. 122. EIR Section 5.13.4
concluded that buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts to school
services upon payment of school fees pursuant to SB 50 and implementation of MM 5.13-1; less
than significant impacts to recreational facilities through continued compliance with the City of
Anaheim Park Dedication Ordinance; and less than significant impacts to library and no mitigation
measures are required in MMP No. 122. SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing
Opportunity Sites would result in no new impacts than were identified in EIR 330 and no new
mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Police and Fire
Implementation of the General Plan would increase the overall demand on fire and police
protection services in the City of Anaheim. There would also be an increase in the number of
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 83
responses within the City which would increase the demand for existing apparatus, equipment,
and personnel. Therefore, the City of Anaheim's costs to maintain equipment and apparatus and
to train and equip personnel would also increase. In addition, the redistribution of the population
into areas where there are currently no residences, could necessitate the reassignment of certain
kinds of resources pertaining to fire and police services. However, the additional personnel and
materials costs may be offset through the increased revenue, and fees, generated by future
development.
School Services
While the City acknowledged that future growth will result in increased need for school facilities,
the City is precluded per SB 50 to consider this a significant impact for the purposes for CEQA.
The payment of development fees will offset the costs to each school district of providing
educational facilities to these students. In addition, the General Plan Goals and Policies for the
Community Development Department to work with school districts to identify sites for new
schools and school expansions in West and Central Anaheim and the Platinum Triangle area will
further reduce potential impacts.
Parks
Development in accordance with the General Plan and Zoning Code Update will increase
demands on existing recreational facilities. Implementation of the Green Element Goals and
Policies and compliance with the City's Park Dedication Ordinance reduces any impacts to
recreational facilities to a less-than-significant level.
Library Services
Any increase in the population or employee population of the City of Anaheim is anticipated to
have an impact on Library Services. However, the projected growth of the City has been included
in the Library Facilities' Master Plan and would meet the need for library building space.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives
for any of the public services:
a-e) Fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. The maximum
buildout of Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155, as listed in Table 3-2 of S EIR No. 346, is 139
residential units. Therefore, based on a reduction in the number of anticipated residential units
on the Project Site, the demand for public services generated by the Proposed Project would be
less than those of 139 residential units evaluated in the Certified EIRs.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 84
The Project Site will continue to be primarily served by Fire Station #5, located at 2540 E. La Palma
Avenue, and the Police Department Main Station, located at 425 S. Harbor Blvd. In order to
provide adequate emergency vehicle access, the Proposed Project would have one driveway on
Lincoln Avenue and one driveway on Sunkist Street with widths consistent with the 24 feet
minimum requirement in the Anaheim Municipal Code. The Applicant would also comply with
MM 5.11-1 to pay police and fire impact fees at the time of issuance of building permits. These
fees will help cover costs for any additional personnel, apparatus, equipment, and materials
associated with the Project. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur, and no further
environmental analysis is required.
The Project Site is within the Anaheim Union High School District with a district-wide enrollment
of 29,828 and the Anaheim Elementary School District with current district-wide enrollment of
15,252 students and current capacity of 17,725. Students will attend Juarez Elementary,
Sycamore Junior High, and Katella High School. Juarez Elementary School has 777 enrolled
students, Sycamore Junior High has 1,325 enrolled students, and Katella High has 2,720
students.
Current student generation factors used by the Anaheim Elementary School District are 0.23
per unit for single-family attached homes, and 0.15 per unit for multi-family units. Current
student generation factors used by the Anaheim Union High School District are 0.0806 per unit
for junior high schools and 0.1548 per unit for high schools. Based on these generation factors,
the project would generate a total of 39 students consisting of 19 elementary students, 7 junior
high students, and 13 high school students.
Table 5.13-14 in EIR No. 330 used multi-family student generation rates of 0.116 per unit for
elementary, 0.013 per unit for junior high, and 0.032 per unit for high school. SEIR No. 346
assumed these same generation rates. Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155 were assumed
to have 139 multi-family units. Therefore, the student capacity analyzed in SEIR No. 346
assumed a total of 24 students consisting of 17 elementary students, 2 junior high students,
and 5 high school students. This increase of 15 students would not cause the school districts to
exceed their respective enrollment capacities.
The Applicant would be required to pay school impact fees pursuant to Senate Bill 50 (SB 50,
codified in Government Code Section 65995), which was enacted in 1988 to address how schools
are financed and how development projects may be assessed for associated school impacts. SB
50 provides three ways to determine funding levels for school districts. The default method
allows school districts to levy development fees to support school construction necessitated by
that development and receive a 50 percent match from State bond money. The payment of
development fees would offset the costs to each District of providing educational facilities to
these students. Therefore, the Proposed Project would be required to pay the current
development impact fees for residential development. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant and no further environmental analysis is required.
As indicated in EIR No. 330, the projected growth of the City, including the Project Site, has
been included in the Library Facilities’ Master Plan and would meet the need for library building
space. Impacts to library service would remain less than significant and no further
environmental analysis is required.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 85
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP PS-1: The Property Owner/Developer would pay school impact fees pursuant to Senate Bill
50 (Government Code Section 65995).
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.11-1: Future projects will be reviewed by the City of Anaheim on an individual basis and
will be required to comply with requirements in effect at the time building permits are issued
(i.e., impact fees, etc.) or if an initial study is prepared and the City determines the impacts to
be significant, then the project will be required to comply with appropriate mitigation measures
(i.e., fire station sites, etc.).
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.11, Police and Fire, Pages 5-199 to 5-202 and 5.13; Public
Services and Facilities, Pages 5-213 to 5-250; and Chapter 5.14, Recreation, Pages 5-259 to 5-262.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-7 an d Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 37.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2022.
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/index.asp. Accessed November 21, 2022.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 86
5.4.16 Recreation
Would the Project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial Increase
in Impact Severity
a) Would the project increase the use
of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration
of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the impacts to recreation and recreational facilities related to the implementation
of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.14.4 concluded that
buildout of the General Plan would increase demand for parks in the City overall, and specifically
in areas where residential uses would be permitted where no such uses existed at the time.
Residential developments in the City are required to dedicate land for parkland and/or pay in-
lieu fees to offset impacts on demands for parks. Impacts were less than significant after
compliance with the City’s park dedication ordinance and no mitigation measures were required
in MMP No. 122. SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would
result in no new or increased significant impacts than those identified in Program EIR No. 330
and no new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Development in accordance with the General Plan and Zoning Code Update will increase
demands on existing recreational facilities. However, continued compliance with the City of
Anaheim park dedication ordinance would mitigate any potential impacts to recreational
facilities. Implementation of the Green Element Goals and Policies and compliance with the City's
park dedication ordinance reduces any impacts to recreational facilities to a less-than-significant
level.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 87
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. Community residents
would have access to common recreational amenities including a dog park, community garden,
and tot lot., in addition to private patios and balconies. Private open space and common
recreational areas serving apartment residents would total over 24,852 square feet, which
exceeds the code requirements for open space by nearly 2,000 square feet. Refer to previous
Figure 5, Open Space Plan.
In addition to the private common recreational amenities serving the Proposed Project, future
residents would have access to public parks located within walking distance. The closest public
park, Pioneer Park, 2565 E. Underhill Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806, is 0.6 mile, or a 12-minute
walk, northeast of the Project Site. It is a 15.8-acre park and includes a children’s play area, picnic
tables, fitness zone, and sports fields. Juarez Park is located 0.8 miles south of the Project Site, at
841 S. Sunkist Street, Anaheim, CA 92806. It is a 9.5-acre park and includes a children’s play area,
picnic tables, and sports fields. Other parks and recreation amenities within a one-mile radius of
the Project Site include Boysen Park, Rio Vista Park and Anaheim Coves Trail. With ample public
parks in the Project vicinity, the Proposed Project would not increase the use of any an existing
park such that substantial physical deterioration would occur.
The maximum buildout of the Project Site, as listed in Table 3-2 of SEIR No. 346, is 139 residential
units. The Proposed Project includes 83 residential units. Therefore, the Proposed Project would
not induce population growth in the area to a greater degree than was evaluated in SEIR No. 346.
With implementation of PPP REC-1 the Proposed Project does not have any significant impacts
related to recreation that either have not already been analyzed in the Certified EIRs or that are
more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate, therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
PPP REC-1: Prior to issuance of building permits, the Property Owners/Developers shall comply
with Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.250, which requires the provision of parkland
and/or the payment of fees, consistent with the Quimby Act.
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.14, Recreation, Pages 5-250 to 5-262.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-7 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 37-38.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 88
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 89
5.4.17 Transportation
Would the project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Conflict with a program, plan,
ordinance, or policy addressing
the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Would the project conflict or be
inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
☐ ☒
c) Substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) Result in inadequate emergency
access?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the transportation and traffic impacts related to the implementation of the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.15.3, which concluded that
buildout of the General Plan would result in significant traffic impacts at seven intersections. With
implementation of MM 5.15-1 through 5.15-8, Program EIR No. 330 identified traffic impacts at
three intersections as significant and unavoidable. Program EIR No. 330 also identified impacts
at one Congestion Management Program intersection, Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road, as
significant and unavoidable. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations
related to this impact. Buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts
to air traffic levels and air traffic patterns; roadway design hazards; emergency access; and
parking capacity. No mitigation measures related to these impacts were required in MMP No.
122.
SEIR No. 346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in significant
traffic impacts at 20 intersections. With implementation of new MM 5.15-8, Supplemental EIR
No. 346 identified traffic impacts at seven of the intersections as significant and unavoidable due
to physical adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations related to this impact. Buildout of
the Housing Opportunity Sites would not result in new or greater significant impacts than those
identified in EIR No. 330 related to roadway design hazards, emergency access, or alternative
transportation. No new mitigation measures were required in MMP No. 122A.
Implementation of the General Plan and Zoning Code Update is anticipated to result in roadways
citywide accommodating a modest amount of growth from the existing baseline to the future
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 90
scenario. Several arterial highways within the City are projected to accommodate a significant
amount of growth in daily traffic. The General Plan and Zoning Code update would result in 25 of
the 250 study intersections operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS E or F) during at
least one of the peak periods. Four of the intersections would operate at unacceptable levels in
both the AM and PM peak periods. Mitigation measures will ensure that the Proposed Project
contributes to planned roadway improvements on a "fair-share" basis. The planned roadway
improvements are feasible and avoid or substantially lessen potentially significant traffic and
circulation impacts to a less-than-significant level. However, necessary improvements to the
Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road intersection could impact adjacent land uses. As a result, a significant
unavoidable adverse impact would remain if the City Council decides not to implement the
necessary improvements to the Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road intersection. The Anaheim City
Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
Criteria for Preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis
The City of Anaheim require traffic studies to assess a project’s effect on LOS and other
operational standards established by the City for General Plan consistency. Preparation of a
traffic impact study in accordance with the requirements outlined in the City of Anaheim Criteria
for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (“the City TIS Guidelines”) is required in the following
cases:
• When the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips
from the proposed development.
• Projects on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Highway System which
generate 1,600 average daily trips (ADT) or adjacent to the CMP Highway System which
generate 2,400 ADT.
• Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either the AM or PM peak hours to any
monitored CMP intersection.
• Any project where variations from the standards and guidelines provided in this manual
are being proposed.
The Proposed Project is forecast to generate fewer than 100 net new trips during the AM or PM
peak hours. Additionally, the Proposed Project is not located on the CMP Highway System and
would not exceed the CMP trip contribution thresholds of 2,400 ADT or 51 trips to a CMP-
monitored intersection during the AM or PM peak hours. Therefore, the Proposed Project does
not meet any of the City-established thresholds requiring the preparation of a traffic impact study
for LOS analysis based on the net trip generation forecast and further analysis is not warranted.
Trip Generation Analysis
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. The
Project Site contains commercial buildings, parking areas, and landscaping. Ganddini Group
prepared a Trip Generation Analysis for the proposed project on August 23, 2022 (Appendix I).
Based on the estimated trip generation, the Proposed Project would generate less than 100
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 91
weekday peak hour vehicle trips and no further traffic impact analysis is required in accordance
with the City of Anaheim Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
The Proposed Project VMT screening evaluation was performed in accordance with guidance
from the City of Anaheim Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental
Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) [“City VMT Guidelines”], which were developed based on
guidance from the OPR Technical Advisory. The City VMT Guidelines establish three types of
project screening that can apply to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment. A
project only needs to fulfill one of the following three screening types to qualify for screening.
These screening criteria are:
• Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
• Low VMT-generating Area Screening
• Project Type Screening
Some project types are presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact absent
substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses are local serving in nature. Local serving retail
generally improves the convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing
vehicle travel. The City VMT Guidelines identify the following uses that can be screened from
project-level assessment as they are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their
local serving nature. One category includes projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips.
The Proposed Project is forecast to result in a net decrease of approximately 12 daily trips
compared to the existing land use. Therefore, the Proposed Project satisfies the City-established
project type screening criteria for projects generating less than 110 daily trips.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Ganddini Group prepared a Trip Generation Analysis (August 23, 2022, Appendix I), which
forecast the Proposed Project would result in a net decrease of approximately 12 fewer daily
trips compared to the existing land use, including 46 fewer trips during the AM peak hour and 34
fewer trips during the PM peak hour.
Pedestrian facilities, including sidewalks and crosswalks are available in the project vicinity.
Internal pedestrian connectivity would be provided by walkways that connect the common open
space amenities and connect to the existing City sidewalks along Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist
Street. The Proposed Project would also be located near various alternative transportation
modes and routes, include transit stops for OCTA Routes 42, 57 and 153. The Proposed Project
would not have any significant impacts related to conflicts with a program plan, ordinance, or
policy addressing the circulation system that the Certified EIRs has not already analyzed and
would not result in more significant or more severe impacts than those analyzed in the Certified
EIRs. No further environmental analysis is required.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 92
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
The State of California adopted changes to the CEQA Guidelines in December 2018, which require
all lead agencies to adopt VMT as a replacement for automobile delay-based Level of Service
(LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This
statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. Ganddini Group prepared a Vehicle Miles
Traveled Screening Assessment for the proposed project on August 23, 2022 (Appendix J). The
VMT analysis evaluated the applicable screening thresholds in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact
Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) to determine
whether the Proposed Project would create impacts related to VMT. Some project types are
presumed to have a less than significant transportation impact, as their uses can be considered
local serving in nature. Among the list of various uses, projects generating less than 110 daily
vehicle trips can be presumed to have a less than significant impact. According to the VMT
analysis, the existing office use to be removed is estimated to generate approximately 610 daily
trips, including 86 trips during the AM peak hour and 81 trips during the PM peak hour. The P
Proposed Project is forecast to generate approximately 598 daily trips, including 40 trips during
the AM peak hour and 47 trips during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the Proposed Project is
forecast to result in a net decrease of approximately 12 fewer daily trips compared to the existing
land use, including 46 fewer trips during the AM peak hour and 34 fewer trips during the PM peak
hour. As such, the Proposed Project will generate less than 110 daily vehicle trips. Therefore, the
Proposed Project can be presumed to have a less than significant impact under Type 3: Project
Type Screening per the City’s Guidelines for VMT analysis. Thus, impacts would be less than
significant, and no mitigation is required. No further environmental analysis is required.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
The Proposed Project would replace an existing driveway access to the project site on Lincoln
Avenue and Sunkist Street with new driveways on Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street. The
driveways would provide right turn in and right turn out access to both streets. The Proposed
Project would also include an internal roadway to provide circulation within the development.
The Proposed Project driveways and internal roadway would be developed to comply with the
City Building Division and Fire & Rescue Department standards. The Proposed Project would
develop 83 townhomes and would not include the use of any incompatible vehicles or
equipment, such as farm equipment. The Proposed Project is surrounded by residential uses;
therefore, the Proposed Project’s residential development would be compatible with the
surrounding uses. The Proposed Project would not substantially increase hazards due to design
or incompatible uses. The Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to
hazardous design features that the Certified EIR has not already analyzed and would not result in
more significant or more severe impacts than those analyzed in the Certified EIR. No further
environmental analysis is required.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
As previously discussed, the Proposed Project would provide site access via a driveway on Lincoln
Avenue and a driveway on Sunkist Street, which are required to be compliant with City Building
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 93
Division and Fire & Rescue Department standards. This compliance includes that the Proposed
Project driveways and internal circulation would accommodate standard fire lane turning
radiuses and hammerhead turnaround maneuvers. To ensure compliance, the Anaheim Fire &
Rescue would review project plans for final approval prior to issuance of a building permit.
Further, it is not anticipated that construction of the Proposed Project would require the closure
of any public roadways. Temporary construction activities would not impede the use of the public
roads for emergencies or access for emergency response vehicles. The Proposed Project would
not have any significant impacts related to emergency access that the Certified EIRs have already
analyzed and would not result in more significant or more severe impacts than those analyzed in
the Certified EIRs. No further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.15-5: Prior to issuance of each building permit, appropriate Transportation Impact and
Improvement Fees shall be paid by the property owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in
amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the
building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the Property
Owner/Developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which
have been established.
MM 5.15-6: Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first, and subject to nexus requirements, the property owner/
developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including
necessary construction easements, the ultimate right(s)-of-way as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan adjacent to their property.
Applicable MMP No. 122A Mitigation Measure:
MM 5.15-8: The General Plan Circulation Element and associated Planned Roadway Network
Map (Figure C-1 of the General Plan), identifies those roadways that are planned to
accommodate current development and future growth established by the Land Use Element.
Roadways will be constructed as development occurs and as funding becomes available. In
addition to the roadways identified on the Planned Roadway Network Map, the improvements
identified in Table 5.4-7 will be necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service within the
anticipated theoretical buildout identified in the General Plan.
Sources:
Appendix I – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Project Trip Generation Analysis, Ganddini Group, Inc.,
August 23, 2022.
Appendix J – KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Project Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Assessment,
Ganddini Group, Inc., August 23, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.15, Traffic and Circulation, Pages 5-263 to 5-322.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 94
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 5.2, Transportation/Traffic, Page
5-13 through 5-34; Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, pages 39-40.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 95
5.4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in
Impact Severity
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☒
b) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead
agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 and SEIR No. 346 did not explicitly evaluate tribal cultural resources because this impact area
was not included in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist until 2014. However, they did
address the potential impacts to cultural resources associated with implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.4.4 concluded that the
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impact to cultural resources with
the implementation of the General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and
MM 5.4-1, 5.4-2 and 5.4-3 required in MMP No. 122. Supplemental EIR No. 346 concluded that
the buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased significant
impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were required in
MMP No. 122A.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and
that is:
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 96
(i.) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or
(ii.) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native American tribe.
The following analysis is based on a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study
prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (Appendix B).
As discussed in the Cultural Resources section, the project site is not listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as
defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k). Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) requires lead
agencies to conduct a formal consultation process with California Native American Tribes to
identify potential significant impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs), as defined in Public
Resources Code Section 21074, as part of CEQA. The Proposed Project is exempt from CEQA as
documented in this Appendix N Checklist.
A Sacred Lands File search was requested from the NAHC for the project to identify any sacred,
religious, or ceremonial sites recorded within the area of the subject property, which returned
negative results. The property records search from the South Central Coastal Information Center
(SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton indicate that no previously recorded sites or
reports are recorded within or crossing the Project Site. There are no previously documented
prehistoric archaeological sites or ethnographically documented camps within or near the project
site—indicating a low probability for TCRs to exist. Past development that has occurred on the
project site and surrounding area, including grading, further decrease the probability of any tribal
resources. Impacts would be less than significant and no further environmental analysis is
required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.4-1: City staff shall require property owners/developers to provide studies to document
the presence/absence of historic resources for areas with documented or inferred resource
presence. On properties where resources are identified, such studies shall provide a detailed
mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,
based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
The requirement for historic resources documentations set forth in this mitigation
measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Cultural and Biological Due
Diligence Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix B). Consequently, no
further action is required.
MM 5.4-2: City staff shall require property owners/developers to provide studies to document
the presence/absence of archaeological and/or paleontological resources for areas with
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 97
documented or inferred resource presence. On properties where resources are identified, such
studies shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery
and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
The requirement for archaeological and paleontological resources documentation set
forth in this mitigation measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Cultural
and Biological Due Diligence Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix B).
Consequently, no further action is required.
MM 5.4-3 All archaeological resources shall be subject to the provisions of CEQA (Public
Resources Code) Section 21083.2.
Sources:
Appendix B – Results of a Cultural and Biological Resources Due Diligence Study for the 2420
East Lincoln Avenue Project, APNs 083-731-18 and -19, Orange County, California, Brian F. Smith
and Associates, Inc., rev. November 18, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.4, Cultural Resources, Pages 5-49 through 5-59.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-2 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page 30.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013. Pages 2-7 to 2-11.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 98
5.4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded
water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power,
natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
b) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project and
reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and
multiple dry years?
Less than
Significant
After
Mitigation
☐ ☒
c) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) Generate solid waste in excess of
State or local standards, or in excess
of the capacity of local infrastructure,
or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
e) Comply with federal, State, and local
management and reduction statutes
and regulations related to solid
waste?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the impacts to utilities and service systems related to the implementation of the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update Program. EIR No. 330, Section 5.12.4 concluded that
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to utilities and
service systems, including water services, sewer services, solid waste, natural gas, telephone and
cable services, with implementation of MM 5.13-3 and 5.13-6 in MMP No. 122. Supplemental EIR
346 concluded that buildout of the Housing Opportunity Sites would result in no new or increased
significant impacts than those identified in EIR No. 330 and no new mitigation measures were
required in MMP No. 122A.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 99
According to the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, the City relies on a combination of
imported water, local groundwater, and a small amount of recycled water to meet its water
needs. The City works together with two primary agencies, Metropolitan and the Orange County
Water District (OCWD), to ensure a reliable water supply that would continue to serve the City in
periods of drought and shortage. The City’s main source of water supply is groundwater from the
Orange County Groundwater Basin. The City has historically relied on approximately 70 percent
groundwater (previous 10-year average) and 30 percent imported water from Metropolitan to
supply its customers. The same water supply mix is anticipated to be available to the City through
2040.
The City’s Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Division is responsible for maintenance of the
City’s sewer and storm drain lines. The Proposed Project is within the Combined Central Anaheim
Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (CCAAMPSS), adopted in December 2017. The CCAAMPSS
study area consists of approximately 10,627 acres in gross area and serves a population of
approximately 134,000 people. The area is essentially fully developed with a mix of residential,
commercial, and industrial land uses.
The Anaheim Public Utilities currently provides electricity to residents and business industry. The
distribution system currently consists of over 1,200 circuit miles of transmission and distribution
lines, over 700 miles of which are underground. In order to facilitate the safe and efficient
transfer of electricity to residences and businesses, 14 distribution substations are located
throughout the City. Anaheim obtains its electric supply from its resources located in or near
Anaheim and across the western United States. To round out its electric supply, the City of
Anaheim participates in seasonal power exchanges as well as additional market purchases where
necessary. Telecommunication services are provided to the City through various companies
including AT&T, Spectrum, Cox Communications, and Frontier.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater
treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Water Services
The total average water demand projection for build out of the General Plan is 112,043 AFY or
approximately 100 mgd. These projections are consistent with the City of Anaheim's current
water demand projections. The Proposed Project would connect to existing water lines and
would not require additional water infrastructure to be built of expanded. According to the 2020
Urban Water Management Plan, the City anticipates being able to meet water demand with
adequate supplies through the year 2045 under normal, dry, and multiple dry year conditions.
The plan’s Drought Risk Assessment shows no water shortages are projected if a drought were
to occur over the next five years. The maximum buildout of the Project Site, as listed in Table
3-2 of Supplemental EIR No. 346, is 139 residential units. Because the Proposed Project would
have fewer residential units than analyzed in Supplemental EIR No. 346 and the Project Site is
currently developed, water demand would be less than analyzed in the Certified EIRs. With the
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 100
implementation of MM 5.13-1, the proposed project would not have significant impacts related
to water facilities that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed
Project have any impacts that are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly
applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further analysis
is required.
Wastewater Services
The sewage flow projection for build-out of the General Plan totals approximately 72 mgd. This
citywide sewage flow would be spread out over many tributary basins and would not constitute
a significant impact. To mitigate potential impacts, each new development project is reviewed to
determine if it is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities. If so, a property
owner/developer will conduct a sanitary sewer study and mitigate any identified deficiencies and
participate in the Infrastructure Improvement Fee Program, if one is adopted for the area.
The Proposed Project involves the demolition of two commercial office buildings and
construction of 83 residential townhouse units on Housing Opportunity Sites 154 and 155. As
required by MM 5.13-4, the Applicant prepared a Sewer Study (Appendix G). The proposed flow
factor for townhome units is 240 gpd/du. The Proposed Project demolition of two commercial
office buildings would result in a total flow decrease from the existing commercial site of 8,718
gpd. The proposed flow increase for the Proposed Project to Sunkist Street is 19,920 gpd, for a
total net average daily flow increase to the downstream tributary sewer collection system of
11,202 gpd. The project flow is proposed to discharge into an 8-inch line on Sunkist Street,
approximately 250 feet south of Lincoln Avenue. The sewer study demonstrates that the
Proposed Project would not increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the Combined
Central Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (CCAAMPSS) and that adequate sewer
flows would be maintained with implementation of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project
would not have any significant impacts related to wastewater treatment that the Certified EIRs
has not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project have any impacts that are more
significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not
substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further analysis is required.
Stormwater
As discussed in Section 5.4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, site runoff will have similar drainage
patterns to the existing condition, and the Proposed Project would convey stormwater to a
subsurface StormTech chamber system or bioretention basins during flooding events.
Additionally, the proposed project’s BMPs and landscaping plan, which would include water-
efficient irrigation systems and water conservation measures, would comply with MM 5.13-1.
The proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to runoff and stormwater
drainage that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project result
in more significant or more severe impacts that that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
The Project Site is an urban infill site served by existing electricity, natural gas, and
telecommunication facilities. Impacts associated with electricity, natural gas, and
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 101
telecommunications facilities would not be greater than those analyzed in the Certified EIRs. The
proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to telecommunications facilities
that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project result in more
significant or more severe impacts that could not be substantially mitigated. Therefore, no
further environmental analysis is required.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
As previously discussed, the City of Anaheim’s projected water supplies are able to meet future
water demands. Additionally, the maximum buildout of the project site, as listed in Table 3-2 of
the SEIR No. 346, is 139 residential units. The Proposed Project would result in the construction
of 83 townhomes. Because the Proposed Project would have fewer residential units than
analyzed in Supplemental EIR No. 346 and the Project Site is currently developed with office uses,
water demand would be lesser than those analyzed in the Certified EIRs, and impacts associated
with water facilities would not be greater than those analyzed in the Certified EIRs. The Proposed
Project’s water demand would be within the projected water supply availability. The Proposed
Project would not have any significant impacts related to water supply availability that the
Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the proposed project have any impacts that
are more significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further analysis is required.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition
to the provider’s existing commitments?
According to the Sewer Study prepared for the Proposed Project, the sewer collection system has
sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional flow generated by the P roposed Project. The
Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to wastewater that the Certified
EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project result in more significant or more
severe impacts that uniformly applicable development policies would not substantially mitigate.
Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of
local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Solid Waste Services
The population projections associated with build out of the General Plan are consistent with the
Orange County Integrated Waste Management District (IWMD) projections and the Regional
Landfill Options for Orange County (RELOOC) program. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated provided IWMD continues to expand landfill capacity consistent with adopted County
growth projections.
The maximum buildout of the project site, as listed in Table 3-2 of the Supplemental EIR No. 346,
is 139 residential units. The Proposed Project would result in the construction of 83 townhomes.
Because the Proposed Project would have fewer residential units than analyzed in Supplemental
EIR No. 346, solid waste generation would be lesser than those analyzed in the Certified EIRs. The
proposed project would not have any significant impacts related to solid waste that the Certified
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 102
EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project have any impacts that are more
significant than previously analyzed, or that uniformly applicable development policies would not
substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further analysis is required.
e) Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
The Proposed Project would comply with all federal, State, and local requirements related to
solid waste. The Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related to solid waste
statutes and regulations that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the
Proposed Project result in more significant or more severe impacts that could not be substantially
mitigated. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 Mitigation Measures:
MM 5.13-1: Prior to issuance of building permits, future projects shall demonstrate compliance
with the following water conservation measures to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Public Utilities
Department:
• Install a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square
feet. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation systems and automatic systems
that include moisture sensors. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in the irrigation system. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of water-conservation landscape plant materials, wherever feasible. (City of Anaheim
Water Conservation Measures)
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals. (City of
Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
• Use of cooling tower and waterway recirculation systems. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures)
• Use of water efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using
appliances. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures).
MM 5.13-4: Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to
determine if it is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities or the Proposed
Project, with peak flows provided by the property owner, will create a deficiency in an existing
sewer line. If the City Engineer determines that either condition exists, the property
owner/developer shall conduct a sanitary sewer study to be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate
master plan sewer study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 103
sewer system or will create a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall
be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the
impacts of the proposed development based upon the applicable sewer deficiency study, prior
to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning
inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted
for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, or a combination thereof.
The requirement for City Engineer review of sewer facilities serving each project set
forth in this mitigation measure has been satisfied by the completion of the Sewer Study
prepared for the project by PSOMAS., which has been reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer.
Sources:
Appendix G – Sewer Study – 2420-2450 E. Lincon Avenue, PSOMAS, July 20, 2022.
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.13, Public Services and Facilities, Pages 5-213 to 5-250.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Page
40-41.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
City of Anaheim 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2021. Available at
https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=.
Accessed November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim Central Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers. December 2017. Available at
https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/20610/CAMPSS_12182017_FINAL-revised.
Accessed November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim About Electric Services. https://www.anaheim.net/2104/About-Electric-
Services. Accessed November 21, 2022.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 104
5.4.20 Wildfire
Would the project:
EIR No.
330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant Impact
Not Identified in
EIR No. 330/346
No New Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in Impact
Severity
a) Substantially impair an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or
the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
c) Require the installation or
maintenance of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources,
power lines or other utilities) that
may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the
environment?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including
downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope instability,
or drainage changes?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the impacts to wildfires related to the implementation of the General Plan and
Zoning Code Update Program in the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the report. Refer
to EIR No. 330, Section 5.6. Development in accordance with the General Plan and Zoning Code
Update was determined to have a less than significant impact on hazards related to wildfire and
no mitigation measures were required.
EIR No. 346 affirmed the finding of less than significant impacts and stated that there were no
new impacts identified requiring additional analysis as a result of implementation of the Housing
Opportunity Sites Rezoning Project.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of Anaheim bordered by urban development. The
Project Site is not located adjacent to areas or lands classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity
Zone. In addition, the Project Site is an urban infill site that is not intermixed with wildlands. As
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 105
such, the Proposed Project would not subject people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death because of exposure to wildfires. The Proposed Project does not have other
features with the potential to exacerbate wildfire, downstream flooding, or landslide risks.
Because the Proposed Project is located in an urbanized area, it would not require the installation
of maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or result in ongoing
impacts to the environment. The Proposed Project would not have any significant impacts related
to wildfires that the Certified EIRs have not already analyzed, nor would the Proposed Project
result in more significant or more severe impacts that uniformly applicable development policies
would not substantially mitigate. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Existing Programs and Policies:
None
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
None
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004. Chapter 5.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Pages 5-100 to 5-
104.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013. Chapter 7, CEQA Mandated Sections, Page
7-7 and Appendix A, Initial Study and NOP, Pages 37-38.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, September 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 106
5.4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Does the Project: EIR No. 330/346
Determination
Potentially
Significant
Impact Not
Identified in EIR
No. 330/346
No New
Impact/No
Substantial
Increase in
Impact Severity
a) Does the project have the
potential to substantially degrade
the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of
a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major
periods of California history or
prehistory?
Less than
Significant ☐ ☒
b) Does the project have impacts
that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental
effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other
current projects, and the effects
of probable future projects)?
New information
Showing
Potentially New or
Increased
Significant Effects
☐ ☒
c) Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
New information
Showing
Potentially New or
Increased
Significant Effects
☐ ☒
Narrative Summary: Impacts analyzed in EIR No. 330 and SEIR No. 346/No new impacts. EIR No.
330 analyzed the project’s impacts related to the implementation of the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update Program.
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project:
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 107
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal,
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
As described in Section 5.4.4, Biological Resources, Program EIR No. 330 determined that
buildout of the General Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to nesting birds
with implementation of MM 5.3-3 and MM 5.3-4. These mitigation measures would require
focused surveys to identify avoidance measures to protect active nests and restricting removal
of nonnative trees to protect nesting birds. With implementation of these mitigation measures,
it was determined that there would be no significant impacts related to the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the environment, reduce fish or wildlife habitat, reduce fish
or wildlife populations below self-sustaining levels, eliminate a plant or animal community, or
reduce the number or range of a rare or endangered plant or animal.
As described in Section 5.4.5, Cultural Resources, Program EIR No. 330 determined that impacts
related to cultural resources would be less than significant with the implementation of the
General Plan Goals and Policies, existing codes and regulations, and MM 5.4-1, 5.4-2 and 5.4-3
required in MMP No. 122. As such, there would be no significant impacts related to the potential
for elimination of important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
EIR No. 330 identified cumulatively considerable impacts related to air quality, noise, and traffic.
Mitigation measures MM 5.2-1 through MM 5.2-6 (air quality), MM 5.10-1 and MM 5.10-2
(noise), and MM 5.15-1 through MM 5.15-8 (traffic) were required to mitigate impacts to these
analysis areas. SEIR No. 346 identified cumulatively considerable impacts related to air quality,
greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and traffic. Mitigation measures MM 5.2-1, MM 5.2-6, and MM
5.2-7 (air quality and greenhouse gas emissions); MM 5.10-1 (noise); and MM 5.15-4, MM 5.15-
5, MM 5.15-6, and MM 5.15-8 (traffic) were required to mitigate impacts to these analysis areas.
Based on the analysis provided in Section 5.4.3, Air Quality; Section 5.4.13, Noise, and Section
5.4.17, Transportation, the Proposed Project would not substantially increase cumulative
impacts related to these analysis areas. No new mitigation measures would be required. As
presented throughout this Appendix N Checklist, the Proposed Project has not been found to
generate new or substantially more severe environmental effects than those previously analyzed
in EIR No. 330 or SEIR No. 346; therefore, there is no likelihood of the Proposed Project causing
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, beyond that which was
previously analyzed in the Certified EIRs.
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Based on the descriptions and analysis presented in Sections 5.4.1 through 5.4.20 of this
Appendix N, the Proposed Project would not generate new or substantially more severe
environmental effects than those previously analyzed in Program EIR No. 330 or Supplemental
EIR No. 346. With implementation of MM BIO-1, MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM TCR-1, MM TCR-2,
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 108
MM TCR-3, MM TCR-4, MM GEO-1, MM GEO-2, and MM HAZ-1, the Proposed Project would not
result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. Therefore, there is no likelihood of the
Proposed Project causing substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly, beyond that which was previously analyzed in the Certified EIRs. Impacts would be
consistent with what the Certified EIRs analyzed.
Existing Programs and Policies:
As identified in this analysis.
Applicable MMP No. 122 and 122A Mitigation Measures:
As identified in this analysis.
Sources:
Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, The
Planning Center, May 2004.
City of Anaheim Housing Opportunities Sites Rezoning Project Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report, The Planning Center/DC&E, July 2013.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 109
6 LIST OF PREPARERS
Sagecrest Planning+Environmental
Laurel Reimer, Senior Project Manager
Kelly Ribuffo, Project Manager
Subconsultants
Katie Wilson, M.S. – Ganddini Group
Catherine Howe, M.S. – Ganddini Group
Brian F. Smith – Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
Reza Saberi, GE – NMG Geotechnical, Inc.
Terri Wright, CEG - NMG Geotechnical, Inc.
Shilpa Sunil – Hillman Consulting, LLC
Ryan Terwilliger – Millman Consulting, LLC
Joshua Williams – Hillman Consulting, LLC
Davis Tang – Hillman Consulting, LLC
Jayne Janda-Timba – Rick Engineering
Mike Swan - PSOMAS
Roma Stromberg, INCE, M.S. – Ganddini Group
Perrie Ilerchil, PE – Ganddini Group
Giancarlo Ganddini – Ganddini Group
City Staff
Planning Services Division
Heather Allen, Principal Planner
Public Works Development Services Division
Naiim Khoury, Consultant
7 REFERENCES
Assembly Bill 32: Global Warming Solutions Act. 2006. Available at:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm.
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). CEQA & Climate Change. January
2008.
California Department of Conservation (DOC). Agricultural Preserves 2010 Status Report,
Williamson Act Parcels, Orange County, California. Available at:
http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/lca/stats_reports/Documents/2010%20Williamson%20A
ct%20Status%20Report.pdf
DOC. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Map for Orange County.
DOC. Seismic Hazard Zones Map, Orange 7.5-Minute Quadrangle. April 15, 1998.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 110
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Natural Community Conservation Plan and
Habitat Conservation Plan for the County of Orange Central and Coastal Sub-region. 1996.
Available at: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP/Plans/Orange-Coastal.
California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Cortese List. Available at:
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm. Accessed November 20, 2022.
California Department of Transportation. Eligible (E) and Officially Designated (OD) [Scenic
Highway] Routes. Available at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/cahisys.htm.
California Geologic Survey. Special Publication 117A, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating
Seismic Hazards in California.
City of Anaheim. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2021. Available at
https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/37199/Anaheim-2020-UWMP?bidId=.
Accessed November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim. About Electric Services. https://www.anaheim.net/2104/About-Electric-
Services. Accessed November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim. Anaheim Outdoors Connectivity Plan. April 2013.
City of Anaheim. Central Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers. December 2017. Available at
https://www.anaheim.net/DocumentCenter/View/20610/CAMPSS_12182017_FINAL-revised.
Accessed November 21, 2022.
City of Anaheim. Citywide Historic Preservation Plan. May 2010. Available at:
http://www.anaheim.net/planning/aRT/PlanCouncil-May2010.pdf.
City of Anaheim. Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies.
City of Anaheim. General Plan
Circulation Element
Green Element: Mineral Resource Map
Noise Element. Pg. N-9
City of Anaheim. General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report No. 330.
May 25, 2004.
City of Anaheim. Municipal Code. 1974; updated as recently as February 2013.
City of Anaheim. Sewer Capacity Map.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2022.
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/index.asp. Accessed November 21, 2022.
Orange County Public Works. Drainage Area Management Plan. 2003.
Orange County Transportation Authority. Orange County Congestion Management Plan. 2011.
Senate Bill 375: Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008. 2008. Available
at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-
0400/sb_375_bill_20080930_chaptered.pdf.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Appendix N Checklist
Page | 111
Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2007 Air Quality Management
Plan. Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-
plan/2007-air-quality-management-plan.
SCAQMD. Rule 403, Fugitive Dust. Amended June 3, 2005. Available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/rule-iv/rule-403.pdf?sfvrsn=4.
State of California, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. CEQA and Climate Change:
Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. June
19, 2008. Pg. 4.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Federal Water Pollution Control Act
(known as the Clean Water Act). November 27, 2002.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes Project
Project Description
Location: 2420 and 2450 Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92806
APNs: 083-731-18, 083-731-19
Applicant: KB Home
Attn: John Abboud
9915 Mira Mesa Blvd, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92614
Phone: (858) 877-4267
Email: jabboud@kbhome.com
Representative: Sagecrest Planning+Environmental
Attn: Laurel Reimer
27128 Paseo Espada, Suite 1524
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Phone: 714-783-1863
Email: lreimer@sagecrestplanning.com
Owner: Albert & Sons Real Estate I, LLC
P.O. Box 12738
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Project Request:
The request is for a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map to allow the construction of a
multi-family, for-sale residential townhome community. While Chapter 18.34 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code allows for by-right housing development in the Residential Opportunity (RO)
Overlay Zone, a Conditional Use Permit is requested as allowed under AMC 18.06.160.030 to reduce
the setbacks along Sunkist Avenue and to reduce the building-to-building setbacks.
Site Description:
The site is located at the southwest corner of East Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street with a street
address of 2420 and 2450 Lincoln Avenue (Project Site). The site consists of two parcels with
Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 083-731-18 and -19. The trapezoid shaped site totals 4.01 acres
in size and measures approximately 615’ wide and varies from roughly 345’ to 182’ deep. The site
is improved with two office buildings formerly occupied by the Employment Development
Department of the State of California. The site is zoned for General Commercial but has a General
Plan Land Use designation of Residential-Medium with a Residential Opportunity (RO) Overlay.
Single family homes are located immediately south of the site and across Lincoln Avenue to the
north. A two-story multifamily development is located immediately to the west. A Mobil gas station
and one- and two-story multifamily developments are located to the east across Sunkist Street.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Lincoln Avenue is designated as a Primary Arterial and Sunkist Street is a Secondary Arterial by the
Circulation Element of the General Plan.
Proposal:
KB Home proposes to demolish all existing site improvements in order to construct 83 for-sale, 3-
story townhomes at a density of 21.3 dwelling units/acre. The project will consist of 10 buildings
and five product types. The project’s unit breakdown is as follows:
Product Type # of Units Bed/Bath Size (SF) Total Size (SF)
Plan I 34 2/2.5 1,415 48,110
Plan 2 14 3/2.5 1,460 20,440
Plan 3 10 3/3.5 1,800 18,000
Plan 4 8 4/3.5 1,761 14,088
Plan 5 17 4/3.5 1,834 31,178
Total: 83 Units and 131,816 SF
The project will implement the development standards set forth in the Multiple Family (RM-3.5)
Residential Zone:
Development Standard RM 3.5 Requirement Provided Comments
Density 0-27.2 du/acre 21.3 du/acre
Building Height 40’ 39’-6”
Minimum Floor Area 2-Bedroom = 825 SF
3-Bedroom = 1,000 SF
4-Bedroom = 1,200 SF
2-Bedroom = 1,415 SF
3-Bedroom = 1,460 SF
4-Bedroom = 1,761 SF
Site Coverage 50% 33%
Structural Setbacks North = 20’
South = 55’
East = 20’
West = 20’
North = 15’ – 38’
South = 55’
East = 10’
West = 47’
Provides 23’ average
Modification requested
Building to Building 40’ 15’ Modification requested
Recreation Area 275 SF/unit = 22,825 SF 24,852 SF
Storage Area 100 SF/unit 100 SF/unit
Parking 237 238
Each townhome will be provided with an attached two-car garage with overhead storage space. An
additional 72 surface parking stalls along the interior property lines will bring the total on-site
parking to 238 parking spaces. The project will provide a total of 24,852 square feet of recreation-
leisure area, including 15,627 square feet of common open space featuring a tot lot, community
barbeques, seating area, dog park, and community garden. The remainder of the common open
space will be provided in landscaped areas and walkways. In addition to the common open space,
each unit will have a private deck varying from 70 to 90 square feet in size and 19 units will have
private patios. In total, the project will provide 9,225 square feet of private open space.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
The four buildings with frontages along Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street will have a height of 39’-
6” and the six interior buildings will have a height of 39’. The unit entryways along Lincoln Avenue
and Sunkist Street will have a grade differential to create a stoop-type entry. The entryways along
Lincoln will also include a 3’-tall fence to create an additional buffer from the street.
Site access will be provided by one driveway on Lincoln Avenue and one driveway on Sunkist Street.
A 24-foot-wide drive aisle will encircle the project and provide garage access for 42 units. Four 20’-
wide and up to 140.7’-deep alleyways will provide garage access for 41 units. The alleyways will
feature landscaping and multi-colored pavement in a wave design.
The project will require between 4 feet and 11 feet of dedication along Lincoln Avenue to achieve
ultimate right-of-way width. It will also require reconstruction of all sidewalks and the addition of a
5’-wide landscaped parkway.
Modification Requests
The project proposes to reduce the structural setbacks along the Sunkist Street frontage from 20’
to 10’. Additionally, the project proposes to reduce the setback between buildings from 40’ to 15’.
These adjustments are being requested pursuant to AMC § 18.06.160.030, which allows
modifications to be approved in order to achieve a good project design, privacy, livability, and
compatibility with surrounding uses.
Pedestrian orientation and increased walkability are hallmarks of livable communities. The project
will eliminate the existing large parking lot and out-of-scale box buildings with a new residential
development. The project will adjust the sidewalks away from the street, provide a new landscaped
parkway, and provide stooped entries to contribute to the pedestrian orientation of the area,
encourage walkability, and promote community interaction.
Reducing the setbacks will allow for an enhanced project design that includes large open space
areas, walkable paths between the buildings, and a site layout that accommodates forward
movement of all vehicles throughout the property. Accommodation for pedestrian safety and
unobstructed vehicle movement has been taken into consideration. Reduction of the Sunkist Street
setback allows the buildings to be placed further from the adjoining residential developments along
the southern and western property lines. The use of enhanced landscaping along these property
lines will minimize any potential privacy impact that the project would have on adjoining neighbors.
The buildings will feature attractive and enhanced architectural elements including façade
articulation, height variation, contrasting colors and materials, and dense landscaping in the setback
and pedestrian access areas. The alleyways providing garage access for 41 of the units will feature
landscaping and multi-colored pavement in a wave design to give the impression that the alleys are
an extension of the common open space. While not counted towards the open space requirement,
these enhanced alleyways will provide over 10,000 square feet of additional common space for
neighbors to play, socialize and engage with each other.
KB Home Lincoln & Sunkist Townhomes
Additionally, reducing the setbacks will allow the development to incorporate larger bedroom
counts. These 4-bedroom dwelling units will accommodate the needs of larger families and reduce
incidents of overcrowding in the existing housing stock.
Surrounding land uses include single-family and multiple-family dwelling units. The primary
exception is the gas station with mini mart, located on the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and
Sunkist Street, and the quick lube and car wash located on the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue
and Sunkist Street. These types of businesses are intended to be at a neighborhood scale and serve
those who live and work in the immediate vicinity. The placement of 83 new dwelling units will not
only be compatible with surrounding residential uses, but with the neighborhood scale businesses.
We respectfully request review of this application. Should you have any questions regarding this
request, please feel free to contact me at (714) 931-9655 or lreimer@sagecrestplanning.com.
Sincerely,
Laurel Reimer
Senior Project Manager
Sagecrest Planning+Environmental
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:NOVEMBER 8, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESSHEET INDEXA-1 COVER SHEETA-2 SITE PLANA-3 CIRCULATION EXHIBITA-4 TRASH EXHIBITA-5 FIRE EXHIBITA-6 OPEN SPACE EXHIBITA-7 SHADOW STUDYA-8 UNIT PLANSA-9 UNIT PLANSA-10 UNIT PLANSA-11 UNIT PLANSA-12 BUILDING AA-13 BUILDING A ELEVATIONSA-14 BUILDING BA-15 BUILDING B ELEVATIONSA-16 BUILDING CA-17 BUILDING C ELEVATIONSA-18 BUILDING DA-19 BUILDING D ELEVATIONSA-20 BUILDING EA-21 BUILDING E ELEVATIONSA-22 BUILDING FA-23 BUILDING F ELEVATIONSA-24 PERSPECTIVESA-25 PERSPECTIVESCOVER SHEETA-1ATTACHMENT NO. 5
LINCOLN AVENUES SUNKIST STREET TOT LOTCOMMUNITY GARDENDOGPARK1F2E3E4E5A6D7B8A9A10CAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMU24.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLE15.0'15.0'55.0'SETBACK18.0'10.0'5.9'22.1'5.0'LANDSCAPEBUFFER18.0'20.0'REQ. AVG.SETBACK24.0'DRIVEAISLE11.0'103.0'13.0'28.0'18.0'10.0' LANDSCAPE BUFFER24.0'DRIVE AISLE70.5'64.0'140.7'20.0'ALLEY20.0'ALLEY17.5'24.2'15.0'38.0'15.0'30.4'23.1'20.0'ALLEYR20.0'R20.0'R20.0'R20.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLEBACKFLOWPREVENTERBACKFLOWPREVENTERFEV10.0'SETBACKMAILBOXES14.1'23.0'PROP. AVG.SETBACKEXISTINGWALL TOREMAINEXISTING WALL TO REMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE FORMORE DETAIL36" HT FENCE AT PATIOSALONG LINCOLN. TYP.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANSMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BESCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.42.6'32.1'R3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLYR3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLY33.7'GARAGESPEED BUMPS TYP. AT COURTS18.0'9.0'TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONSNOT TO SCALE9.0'9.0'2.0'PER STANDARD DETAIL 4702.0'2.0'2.0'4" STRIPING5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:NOVEMBER 8, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESCONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN0 15 30 60NA-2PROJECT SUMMARY3-STORY TH & CARRIAGESHOMES83 RESIDENCESAREA4.0 ACRESNET AREA3.9 ACRESDENSITY21.3 DU/ACLOT COVERAGE 33%PRODUCT MIXCARRIAGES34 PLAN 1 2B/2.4B 1,415 S.F.14 PLAN 2 3B/2.5B 1,460 S.F.10 PLAN 3 3B/3.5B 1,800 S.F.58 SUBTOTALTOWNHOMES 8 PLAN 4 4B/3.5B 1,761 S.F.17 PLAN 5 4B/3.5B 1,834 S.F.25 SUBTOTAL83 TOTAL UNITS PARKING REQUIRED2BD 34 X 2.25 77 SPACES3BD 24 X 3 72 SPACES4BD 25 X 3.5 88 SPACESTOTAL237 SPACESPARKING PROVIDEDGARAGES166ON SITE 72TOTAL238 SPACESEV PARKING238 SPACES X 10% = 24 FUTURE EV SPACESFRONT SETBACK ALONG LINCOLNREQUIRED20 FT AVERAGEPROVIDED23 FT AVERAGELEGENDBUILDING NUMBERBUILDING TYPE AMU ACCESSIBLE MULTISTORY UNIT FEV FUTURE EV SPACE8A7' X 50' SIGHT TRIANGLE25' X 25' SIGHT TRIANGLEDECORATIVE STAMPEDASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENTSPEED BUMP
LINCOLN AVENUES SUNKIST STREET TOT LOTCOMMUNITY GARDENDOGPARK1F2E3E4E5A6D7B8A9A10CAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMU*********24.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLE15.0'15.0'55.0'SETBACK18.0'10.0'5.9'22.1'5.0'LANDSCAPEBUFFER18.0'20.0'REQ. AVG.SETBACK24.0'DRIVEAISLE11.0'103.0'13.0'28.0'18.0'10.0' LANDSCAPE BUFFER24.0'DRIVE AISLE70.5'64.0'140.7'20.0'ALLEY20.0'ALLEY17.5'24.2'15.0'38.0'15.0'30.4'23.1'20.0'ALLEYR20.0'R20.0'R20.0'R20.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLEBACKFLOWPREVENTERBACKFLOWPREVENTERFEV10.0'SETBACKMAILBOXES14.1'23.0'PROP. AVG.SETBACKEXISTINGWALL TOREMAINEXISTING WALL TO REMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE FORMORE DETAIL36" HT FENCE AT PATIOSALONG LINCOLN. TYP.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANSMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BESCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.42.6'32.1'R3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLYR3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLY33.7'GARAGESPEED BUMPS TYP. AT COURTSPLANTERSTYP.DECORATIVECOLOREDCONCRETEUNITENTRYUNITENTRYUNITENTRYDRIVE AISLEBOLLARDSUNITENTRYUNITENTRYUNITENTRYAC UNITTYP.20.0'ALLEY20.0'OVERHANG35.3'GARAGE TO GARAGE28.5'GARAGE TO GARAGE21.5'OVERHANG29.5'OVERHANGUNITENTRYUNITENTRYUNITENTRYUNITENTRYAMU**AMUSPEEDBUMP5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:NOVEMBER 8, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESCIRCULATION EXHIBIT0 15 30 60NA-3LEGENDPATH OF TRAVELVEHICULAR CIRCULATIONPEDESTRIAN ACCESSACCESSIBLE THRESHOLD7' X 50' SIGHT TRIANGLE25' X 25' SIGHT TRIANGLE AMU ACCESSIBLE MULTISTORY UNIT 10% OF 83 DU = 9 UNITS (PLAN 3)DECORATIVE STAMPED ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENTSPEED BUMPBUILDING NUMBERBUILDING TYPETYPICAL COURT*8A
LINCOLN AVENUES SUNKIST STREET TOT LOTCOMMUNITY GARDENDOGPARK1F2E3E4E5A6D7B8A9A10C(54 BINS)(9 BINS)(12 BINS)(12 BINS)(12 BINS)(9 BINS)(12 BINS)(12 BINS)(6 BINS)(12 BINS)AMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMU24.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLE15.0'15.0'55.0'SETBACK18.0'10.0'5.9'22.1'5.0'LANDSCAPEBUFFER18.0'20.0'REQ. AVG.SETBACK24.0'DRIVEAISLE11.0'103.0'13.0'28.0'18.0'10.0' LANDSCAPE BUFFER24.0'DRIVE AISLE70.5'64.0'140.7'20.0'ALLEY20.0'ALLEY17.5'24.2'15.0'38.0'15.0'30.4'23.1'20.0'ALLEYR20.0'R20.0'R20.0'R20.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLEBACKFLOWPREVENTERBACKFLOWPREVENTERFEV10.0'SETBACKMAILBOXES14.1'23.0'PROP. AVG.SETBACKEXISTINGWALL TOREMAINEXISTING WALL TO REMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE FORMORE DETAIL36" HT FENCE AT PATIOSALONG LINCOLN. TYP.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS(57 BINS)(15 BINS)
(15 BINS)
(12 BINS)MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BESCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.42.6'32.1'R3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLYR3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLY33.7'GARAGESPEED BUMPS TYP. AT COURTS5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:NOVEMBER 8, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESTRASH EXHIBIT0 15 30 60NA-4LEGENDRED CURB FOR TRASH PICK UPTRASH BINS - STORAGE LOCATIONTRASH BINS - COLLECTION LOCATIONTRASH TRUCK ROUTETRASH SUMMARY83 RESIDENCES X 3 BINS = 249 TOTAL TRASH BINS
LINCOLN AVENUES SUNKIST STREET TOT LOTCOMMUNITY GARDENDOGPARK1F2E3E4E5A6D7B8A9A10CAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMUAMU24.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLE15.0'15.0'55.0'SETBACK18.0'10.0'5.9'22.1'5.0'LANDSCAPEBUFFER18.0'20.0'REQ. AVG.SETBACK24.0'DRIVEAISLE11.0'103.0'13.0'28.0'18.0'10.0' LANDSCAPE BUFFER24.0'DRIVE AISLE70.5'64.0'140.7'20.0'ALLEY20.0'ALLEY17.5'24.2'15.0'38.0'15.0'30.4'23.1'20.0'ALLEYR20.0'R20.0'R20.0'R20.0'24.0'DRIVEAISLEBACKFLOWPREVENTERBACKFLOWPREVENTERFEV10.0'SETBACKMAILBOXES14.1'23.0'PROP. AVG.SETBACKEXISTINGWALL TOREMAINEXISTING WALL TO REMAINREFER TO LANDSCAPE FORMORE DETAIL36" HT FENCE AT PATIOSALONG LINCOLN. TYP.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANSMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BESCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.42.6'32.1'R3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLYR3-5(R) SIGNAGERIGHT TURN IN/OUT ONLY33.7'GARAGESPEED BUMPS TYP. AT COURTS5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:NOVEMBER 8, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRE EXHIBIT0 15 30 60NA-5LEGENDVEHICULAR CIRCULATIONFIRE ACCESS ROADFIRE HYDRANT
21'-0" x 20'-0"GARAGE24'-312"24'-1012"TRR100 CU FT
HANGING
STORAGE
8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE17'-0"18'-0"ORGDECK22'-0" x 13'-0"GREAT ROOM7'-0"10'-3"29'-10"24'-1012"12'-0" x 14'-0"KITCHENPDR24'-1012"29'-10"11'-0" x 15-0"MSTR BDRM11'-6" x 12'-6"BEDROOMW/DBABA26'-4"21'-9"20'-0" x 20'-0"GARAGETRR100 CU FT
HANGING
STORAGE
8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE17'-0"18'-0"ORG30'-7"24'-7"12'-0" x 15'-0"KITCHEN21'-0" x 14'-0"GREAT ROOMPDRDECK8'-412"8'-4"30'-7"24'-7"10'-6" x 13-0"MSTR BDRM11'-0" x 10'-6"BEDROOM10'-0" x 10'-0"BEDROOMBABAW/DPLAN 1: 2BD/2.5BA1ST FLR - 51 S.F.2ND FLR- 648 S.F.3RD FLR- 716 S.F.TOTAL 1,415 S.F.DECK 72 S.F.GARAGE 509 S.F.PLAN 2: 3BD/2.5BA1ST FLR - 67 S.F.2ND FLR- 664 S.F.3RD FLR- 729 S.F.TOTAL 1,460 S.F.DECK 70 S.F.GARAGE 486 S.F.5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORUNIT PLANSA-8FIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOOR0 4 8 12
22'-0" x 20'-0"GARAGE9'-6" x 11'-0"BEDROOM33'-112"22'-11"TRR100 CU FT
HANGING STORAGE
17'-0"18'-0"8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACEORGPLAN 3: 3BD/3.5BA1ST FLR - 295 S.F.2ND FLR- 803 S.F.3RD FLR- 702 S.F.TOTAL 1,800 S.F.DECK 70 S.F.GARAGE 469 S.F.PDR24'-0" x 14'-0"GREAT ROOM12'-0" x 12'-0"KITCHEN25'-10"36'-0"DECK9'-412"7'-6"W/D11'-0" x 12'-6"BEDROOM13'-6" x 11-6"MSTR BDRMBAMSTR BA25'-10"29'-10"5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORUNIT PLANSA-90 4 8 12
12'-0" x 10'-0"BEDROOM37'-7"20'-8"20'-0" x 20'-0"GARAGETRR100 CU FTHANGING STOR.8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE
8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE
17'-0"18'-0"ORGBAPLAN 4: 4BD/3.5BA1ST FLR - 298 S.F.2ND FLR- 715 S.F.3RD FLR- 748 S.F.TOTAL 1,761 S.F.DECK 90 S.F.GARAGE 461 S.F.DECKPDRW/D16'-0" x 13'-0"LIVING16'-0" x 9'-0"DINING16'-0" x 9'-0"KITCHEN20'-8"40'-1"
7'-0"13'-912"11'-0" x 12-6"MSTR BDRM10'-0" x 11'-0"BEDROOM10'-0" x 10'-0"BEDROOM20'-8"40'-1"BABA5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORUNIT PLANSA-100 4 8 12
12'-0" x 10'-0"BEDROOM20'-8"39'-6"
37'-7"
1'-11"20'-0" x 20'-0"GARAGETRR100 CU FT HANGING STOR.8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE
8.5' X 18' CLEAR PARKING SPACE
17'-0"18'-0"ORGBAPLAN 5: 4BD/3.5BA1ST FLR - 316 S.F.2ND FLR- 743 S.F.3RD FLR- 775 S.F.TOTAL 1,834 S.F.DECK 86 S.F.GARAGE 461 S.F.10'-0" x 15'-0"KITCHEN10'-0" x 14'-0"DINING16'-0" x 16'-0"LIVINGPDRDECK20'-8"41'-6"
7'-912"10'-11"40'-1"
1'-11"
5B WINDOW LOCATIONS
OCCURS ONLY AT END CONDITIONS
5C WINDOW LOCATIONS
OCCURS ONLY AT END CONDITIONS
15'-0"SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGSPLAN 5AINTERIOR CONDITIONPLAN 5BEND CONDITIONPLAN 5CEND CONDITIONW/D12'-0" x 14-0"MSTR BDRM10'-0" x 11'-6"BEDROOM10'-0" x 10'-0"BEDROOMLINEN20'-8"39'-7"40'-1"BABA15'-0"SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS5B WINDOW LOCATIONSOCCURS ONLY AT END CONDITIONS5C WINDOW LOCATIONSOCCURS ONLY AT END CONDITIONSPLAN 5AINTERIOR CONDITIONPLAN 5BEND CONDITIONPLAN 5CEND CONDITION5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORUNIT PLANSA-110 4 8 12
PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 2PLAN 2130'-1112"49'-4"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 2PLAN 2VALLEYRIDGE4:12VALLEYVALLEY4:12HIP HIP5:12 5:125:12SOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 7,944 SF X 15% = 1192 SFPROVIDED = 1200 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING AA-120 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-0"162873916287395416287395415287394MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT8 DECORATIVE FOAM EAVE9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING(CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)GARAGEGARAGEGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMBEDROOMBEDROOM9'-1"8'-1"9'-1"100 CU FTHANGINGSTORAGE100 CU FTHANGINGSTORAGE7'-0"5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING A ELEVATIONSA-130 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2120'-412"52'-10"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2RIDGE4:12 VALLEYHIPHIPVALLEYVALLEYVALLEY4:12 5:125:125:125:12 SOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 7,925 SF X 15% = 1188 SFPROVIDED = 1200 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING BA-140 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-0"1528739416287395416287395415287394MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT8 DECORATIVE FOAM EAVE9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING(CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)9'-1"8'-1"9'-1"GARAGEGARAGEGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMBEDROOMBEDROOM5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING B ELEVATIONSA-150 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3141'-612"49'-4"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3PLAN 3RIDGE4:12VALLEYVALLEY4:12 HIPHIP5:125:12SOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLARREADYAREA600 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 7,962 SF X 15% = 1195 SFPROVIDED = 1200 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING CA-160 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-0"162873912873954128739541628739MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT8 DECORATIVE FOAM EAVE9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING(CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)GARAGEGARAGEGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMBEDROOMBEDROOM9'-1"8'-1"9'-1"100 CU FTHANGINGSTORAGE100 CU FTHANGINGSTORAGE7'-0"5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING C ELEVATIONSA-170 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1 PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 295'-4"52'-10"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"3'-812"4'-312"3'-812"4'-312"PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 1PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2PLAN 2RIDGE4:12 VALLEYHIPHIPVALLEYVALLEYVALLEY4:125:125:125:125:12 SOLARREADYAREA500 SFSOLARREADYAREA500 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 6,384 SF X 15% = 957 SFPROVIDED = 1000 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING DA-180 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-0"1528739416287395416287395415287394MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT8 DECORATIVE FOAM EAVE9 EXTERIOR LIGHTING(CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)9'-1"8'-1"9'-1"GARAGEGARAGEGREAT ROOMGREAT ROOMBEDROOMBEDROOM5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING D ELEVATIONSA-190 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
PLAN 5APLAN 4PLAN 4PLAN 5APLAN 5BPLAN 5C39'-6"124'-8"PLAN 5CPLAN 5APLAN 5APLAN 5BPLAN 4PLAN 4PLAN 5BPLAN 5APLAN 5APLAN 5CPLAN 4PLAN 4RIDGE4:12 4:124:12 4:124:12 RIDGERIDGEVALLEY VALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEY SRA80 SFSRA335 SFSRA335 SFSRA80 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 5,490 SF X 15% = 824 SFPROVIDED = 830 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING EA-200 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-6"1528739461112MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE AWNING8 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT9 DECORATIVE RAFTER TAILS10 DECORATIVE METAL GRILLE11 DECORATIVE CORBEL12 EXTERIOR LIGHTING (CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)128396128396152839411129'-1"9'-1"9'-1"GARAGEGREAT ROOMBEDROOM5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING E ELEVATIONSA-210 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
PLAN 5APLAN 4PLAN 4PLAN 5APLAN 5BPLAN 5C39'-6"145'-6"PLAN 5APLAN 5CPLAN 5APLAN 5APLAN 5BPLAN 4PLAN 4PLAN 5APLAN 5BPLAN 5APLAN 5APLAN 5CPLAN 4PLAN 4PLAN 5ARIDGE4:12 4:124:12 4:124:12 RIDGERIDGEVALLEY VALLEYVALLEYVALLEYVALLEYSRA270 SFSRA630 SFSRA80 SFSOLAR READY AREAREQUIRED = 6,383 SF X 15% = 957 SFPROVIDED = 980 SF5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFIRST FLOORSECOND FLOORTHIRD FLOORBUILDING FA-220 8 16 24 ROOF PLANSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"
39'-6"15287394612MATERIAL SCHEDULE1 ROOF - CONCRETE TILE2 FASCIA - 2X RESAWN WOOD3 WALL - STUCCO4 TRIM - 2X STUCCO OVER5 METAL RAILING6 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS7 DECORATIVE AWNING8 DECORATIVE GABLE ACCENT9 DECORATIVE RAFTER TAILS10 DECORATIVE METAL GRILLE11 DECORATIVE CORBEL12 EXTERIOR LIGHTING (CHATHAM 89273BLE-46)12839612839615283941112GARAGEGREAT ROOMBEDROOMBEDROOMBEDROOM9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"100 CU FTHANGING STOR7'-0"5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESFRONTBUILDING F ELEVATIONSA-230 8 16 24 LEFTREARRIGHTTYPICAL SECTION
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESBUILDING APERSPECTIVESA-24BUILDING F - LINCOLN AVEALLEY - NORTHALLEY - SOUTH
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404Bonsall, CA 92003760.724.1198ARCHITECTURESCALE:SEPTEMBER 9, 2022KB HOME9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100SAN DIEGO, CA 92131858.877.4256ANAHEIM, CALINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMESBUILDING E - LINCOLN AVEPERSPECTIVESA-25COMMON AREAALLEY - NORTHALLEY - SOUTH
W
S
G
E
562
OHE
FO
T
AC AC AC AC AC AC
ACAC
ACACACACACACACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
ACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC AC AC AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
ACEVERTLR
TRACT BOUNDARY
TRACT BOUNDARY
TRACT BOUNDARYTRACT BOUNDARY
L=36.11'
R=25.00°
|=82°45'49"
L=17.02'
R=2625.09°
|=0°22'17"
N 01°03'43"E ~ 0.23'
NO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 60'
KEY MAP
CIVIL ENGINEER:
ARCHITECT:UTILITY PURVEYORS:
OWNER/ DEVELOPER:
WATER
SEWER
ELECTRICITY
PHONE/INTERNET
(714) 765-3300
CITY OF ANAHEIM, PUBLIC WORKS
(714) 765-3300
CITY OF ANAHEIM, PUBLIC WORKS
SHEET INDEX
1
2
3
4
5
TITLE SHEET
6
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
BASIS OF BEARINGS
VESTED OWNER
DATUM STATEMENT
BENCHMARK STATEMENT
55
E
L
INCOLN
AVE
E SOUTH ST
E SUNKIST STDR
E WESTPORT
S PEREGRINE STW WESTPORT DR
STATE COLLEGE BLVDSITE
PROJECT
W
S
560
RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED
EXISTING
TOP OF GRATE
FINISHED FLOOR
ASPHALT CONCRETE
INVERT ELEVATION
CENTERLINE
FINISH GRADE
PAD ELEVATION
HIGH POINT
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE
EXISTING GROUND
CURB FACE
GARAGE FLOOR FRONT
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY
FINISH SURFACE
FLOW LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
BOTTOM
TOP OF PIPE
PROP
RW
FG
FL
TG
FF
AC
IE
CL
FS
PE
HP
PCC
EG
EX/EXIST
CF
GFF
GSWC
OCFA
FH
BOT
TP
ABBREVIATIONS
PROPOSED EASEMENT
CENTER LINE
PROPOSED WATER
PROPOSED SEWER
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
PROPOSED CURB
PROJECT BOUNDARY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONCRETE
PROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETE
PROPOSED WATER VALVE
PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTER
PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
PROPOSED SEWER CLEANOUTPROPOSED SEWER SERVICE LATERAL
PROPOSED WATER SERVICE LATERAL
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED CURB INLET
DETENTION CHAMBERS
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
LEGEND
(714) 765-5158
CITY OF ANAHEIM, PUBLIC UTILITES
VERIZON (469) 886-4238
AT&T (714) 507-3526
SYSTEM (CCS 83), ZONE VI, NAD 83, (2017.50 EPOCH)
COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE
AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL = 191.00'
MAY BE OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES BY .99999282
DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES
ELEVATION 189.276' (NAVD 88)
BM = 1K-34-06
ORANGE COUNTY VERTICAL CONTROL
SECTIONSSUNKIST STREETE
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
UNIT 75UNIT 82
UNIT 81UNIT 76
UNIT 77UNIT 80
UNIT 79UNIT 78
UNIT 74UNIT 83
UNIT 64UNIT 73
UNIT 72UNIT 65
UNIT 66UNIT 71
UNIT 67UNIT 70
UNIT 69UNIT 68 UNIT 58UNIT 59
UNIT 60UNIT 57
UNIT 56UNIT 61
UNIT 55
UNIT 54UNIT 63
UNIT 62
UNIT 44UNIT 53
UNIT 52UNIT 45
UNIT 46UNIT 51
UNIT 47UNIT 50
UNIT 49 UNIT 48
UNIT 36UNIT 43
UNIT 42UNIT 37
UNIT 38UNIT 41
UNIT 40 UNIT 39
UNIT 26UNIT 35
UNIT 34UNIT 27
UNIT 28UNIT 33
UNIT 32UNIT 29
UNIT 30UNIT 31
UNIT 20
UNIT 21
UNIT 22
UNIT 23
UNIT 24
UNIT 25
UN
IT
19
UN
IT
18
UN
IT
17
UN
IT
16
UN
IT
15
UN
IT
14
UN
IT
13
UN
IT
12
UN
IT
11
UN
IT
10
UN
IT
9
UN
IT
8
UN
IT
1
UN
IT
2
UN
IT
3
UN
IT
4
UN
IT
5
UN
IT
6
UN
IT
7
MAPPING
ALBERT & SONS REAL ESTATE 1, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
SITE SUMMARY:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
COUNTY SURVEYOR.
AS SHOWN HEREON. SAID GPS RECORDS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE ORANGE
N 77°58'46" W PER RECORDS ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF LINCOLN AVENUE
GPS 5249 N=2253183.52 E= 6063915.11, 2017.50 EPOCH. SAID BEARING BEING
HORIZONTAL CONTROL STATION GPS 5248 N=2252622.81 E= 6066548.42 AND
THE BEARING SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE BEARING BETWEEN OCS
LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD.
DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE, AND AREAS PROTECTED BY
1% CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH
ZONE X IS DEFINED AS AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, AREAS OF
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 06059C0134J DATED DECEMBER 3, 2009.
ENTIRE PROJECT AREA IS WITHIN FEMA DESIGNATED FLOOD ZONE X PER
CONTACT: DAMIAN TAITANO
BONSALL, CA 92003
5256 S MISSION RD, SUITE 404
SUMMA ARCHITECTURE
STORM DRAIN
GAS
(714) 765-3300
CITY OF ANAHEIM, PUBLIC WORKS
SO. CAL. GAS COMPANY (800) 427-2200
CONTACT: JOHN O'MALLEY
TEMECULA, CA 92590
28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202
WEILAND DESIGN GROUP, INC
PHONE: (949) 588-0707
CONTACT: BARRY J. COWAN, PE
IRVINE, CA 92618
36 DISCOVERY, SUITE 240
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
EXISTING WATER
EXISTING SEWER
EXISTING STORM DRAIN
EXISTING GAS
EXISTING ELECTRIC
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED FENCE
PROPOSED GUTTER
PROPOSED DRAINAGE SWALE
PROPOSED AIR RELEASE VALVE
PROPOSED BLOW-OFF
EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
EXISTING FIBER OPTIC
EXISTING TELEPHONE
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
IN THE OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY RECORDER.
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2018000253764, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS,
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED JULY 11, 2018
NO. LLA-0000770, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
PARCELS A AND B DESCRIBED IN LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
THE LAND REFERED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED
SITE PLAN
GRADING PLAN
UTILITY PLANL=182.05'R=2715.09°|=3°50'30"N89°13'50"W 615.13'N1°04'18"E 344.90'N
7
7
°58
'46
"W
613
.22
'
FIRE SERVICE LINE FS
PROPOSED POST INDICATOR VALVE
7 FIRE PLAN
BUILDING 10 BUILDING 9 BUILDING 8 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 6
BUILDING 5 BUILDING 4
BU
ILD
ING
3
BU
ILD
ING
2
BU
ILD
ING
1
S
PIV
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
(APN 083-731-18 & 083-731-19)
2420-2450 EAST LINCOLN AVENUE
TITLE SHEET
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL, INC
21 DU/AC NET:
20 DU/ACGROSS:DENSITY:
= 10 BUILDINGS (83 UNITS) TOTAL
+ 5 BUILDINGS (10 UNITS EACH)
+ 1 BUILDING (8 UNITS)
+ 1 BUILDING (7 UNITS)
PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS: 3 BUILDINGS (6 UNITS EACH)
3.93 ACRES (171,037 SF) NET:
SITE AREA: GROSS: 4.02 ACRES (175,118 SF)
PROPOSED: 1
EXISTING: 2NO. OF LOTS:
PROPOSED: RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUM
EXISTING: RESIDENTIAL-MEDIUMGENERAL PLAN:
OVERLAY ZONE R-O (RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY)
PROPOSED: C-G (GENERAL COMMERICAL) &
OVERLAY ZONE R-O (RESIDENTIAL OPPORTUNITY)
ZONING: EXISTING: C-G (GENERAL COMMERICAL) &
PROPOSED: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LAND USE: EXISTING: OFFICE USE
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (APN): 083-731-18 & 19
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CA 92806
SITE ADDRESS: 2420 & 2450 EAST LINCOLN AVENUE
INSTRUMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT.
BE REVEIWED, APPROVED, AND RECORDED BY SEPARATE
EGRESS RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. EASEMENTS SHALL
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE INCLUDING INGRESS AND
DEDICATED PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AND
INTERIOR DRIVE AISLES, AS INDICATED ON PLAN, SHALL BE
PROPOSED EASEMENTS:
LOT 1
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
1
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:37
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_01_Title.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/2022XS
XS
XS
XSNO PARKINGNO PARKINGVPIV
COX
COX
X
X
X
X
EVX
MHX
EV
COX
COX
COX
X
X
X
X
X
X
EV
EVX
XSVAR
XEVXERTLRV
XTPB
X
TLRXEVX
EVX
XTPB
XTPBUVXWX
TLRX
EVX
XTPBEVX
WX
EVX
XTPB
EV
X
X
XT
P
B UVXT
X
UVX
XT
PB
E
V
X
EVXX
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:37
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_02_Maping.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/20222
PLOTTED
ON LINCOLN AVE.
RIGHT OF WAY
30' HALF WIDTH
ORIGINAL
AS SHOWN HEREON
OF LINCOLN AVENUE
SUNKIST AND A PORTION
RIGHT OF WAY ON
AS SHOWN HEREON
OF LINCOLN AVENUE
A PORTION
RIGHT OF WAY ON
PLOTTED
PLOTTED
PLOTTED
PLOTTED
NO.ITEM DATARECORD DESCRIPTION REMARKS
DEEDS OF85
PAGE 275,BOOK
AS 1915 7,MAY
UTILITYPUBLIC
AND ROAD FOREASEMENT
RECORDS
OFFICIALOF
218 PAGE8437,
BOOK AS1967
15,NOVEMBER PIPELINES FOREASEMENT
RECORDSOFFICIAL
OF 1116PAGE
11057, BOOKAS
1974 15,JANUARY
UTILITYPUBLIC
AND ROAD FOREASEMENT
RECORDS
OFFICIAL OF465
PAGE 11417,BOOK
AS 1975 30,MAY
UTILITYPUBLIC
AND ROAD FOREASEMENT
RECORDSOFFICIAL
OF 968PAGE
11677, BOOKAS
1976 18,MARCH
UTILITES
PUBLC FOREASEMENT
UTILITYPUBLIC
AND ROAD FOREASEMENT
DEDICATE TOOFFER
RECORDSOFFICIAL
OF89-705384
NO.RECORDING
AS1989
29,DECEMBER
FACILITIESWATER
FOR EGRESS ANDINGRESS
INCLUDINGUTILITY
PUBLIC FOREASEMENT
EGRESSAND
INGRESSFACILITIES,
COMMUNICATION
UNDERGROUND
FOREASEMENT
TOPOGRAPHY NOTE
OFFICIAL RECORD
89-072800 OF
RECORDING NO.
1989 AS
FEBRUARY 10,
OFFICIAL RECORDS
2001-0106330 OF
RECORDING NO.
2001 AS
FEBRUARY 27,
PARCEL A
PARCEL B
INST. NO. 2018000253764 O.R.
RECORDED JULY 11, 2018
LLA-0000770
INST. NO. 2018000253764 O.R.
RECORDED JULY 11, 2018
LLA-0000770
3
6
6
9
10
2
5
4
NO. 80-235
PARCEL MAP
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 1
267.70'(N 00°10'16" E 267.71 R1)MM 169/ 11-12
TRACT NO. 4717RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, M.M. 5/10PORTION OF SECTION 12,T .4 S., R. 10 W.4
(N 89°52'20" E 615.10' R1 AND R2)(N
78
°52
'36
" W
6
13
.22
' R
1
AND
R
2
)R=2715.09'L=182.05'|=350'30"&MR1&(RR2)L1
(N 89°52'20" E 660.10' R1 AND R2)(N 00°10'28" E 398.88' R1 AND R2)382'53'30'23'20'
45'
ESTABLISHED BY INTERSECTION
SHEET NO. 5248 AND R2.
GPS HORIZONTAL CONTROL DATA
LINCOLN AND SUNKIST PER O.C.
ACCEPTED AS CL INTERSECTION
FD. 2" BRASS DISK IN WELL
50'5'20'AND DISTANCE PER R1 AND R2.
ESTABLISHED RECORD ANGLE
40'20'PARCEL 2
LINE
EASTERLY23'7'10'8
R1 AND R2N85°59'14"W PCC(RAD.)
N85°05'24"W PCC(RAD.)
N85°29'18"W PRC(RAD.)
R1 AND R2
N86°21'31"W PRC(RAD.)C2
MAPPING
L
C
L
INCOLN
AV
ENU
E
LRECORD DISTANCE PER R1 AND R2.
ESTABLISHED ON LINE AT
FOLLOWING ARE EXCEPTIONS THERE TO:
REPORT ORDER NO. 00150903-987-OC1-K27, DATED APRIL 22, 2021. THE
REFERENCE IS MADE TO CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY PRELIMINARY TITLE
R5 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RSB 87/26.
MM 10/38.
R4 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL MAP
MM 372/15-16.
R3 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT NO. 8910
MAP NO. 80-235, MM 150/48.
R2 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER PARCEL
NO. 2018000253764 O.R.
RECORDED JULY 11, 2018 AS INST.
R1 INDICATES RECORD DATA PER LLA-0000770
MAP REFERENCES
X
SNF
FD.
LEGEND
C
3C
4C4 4°52'59" 310.00' 26.42'
C3 4°52'59" 540.00' 46.02'
C2 82°31'05" 25.00' 36.01' (R1 AND R2)
C2 82°45'49" 25.00' 36.11'
C1 0°22'17" 2625.09' 17.02' (R&M R1 AND R2)
---- ----------- --------- --------
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
CURVE TABLE
L1 N 0°10'16" E 0.23' (R1 AND R2)
L1 N 1°03'43" E 0.23'
---- ---------------- ---------
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
LINE TABLE
EXISTING LOT LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
PROPOSED
INTERVAL IS ONE FOOT.
GROUND SURVEY METHODS ON SEPT. 01, 2021. THE CONTOUR
THE TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN HEREIN WAS COMPILED FROM
(N 00°10'28" E 344.90' R1 AND R2)0
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 30'
1530 30 60 90C1EXISTING EASEMENTS
INDICATES SEARCH NOTHING FOUND.
INDICATES FOUND
INDICATES TITLE REPORT ITEM
INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED.
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
INDICATES BOUNDARY
PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION AREA
TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
AREA TO BE DEDICATED11'45'
45'C SUNKIST STREET
NOT TO SCALE
(FF PER PLAN)
FINISHED FLOOR
(SOUTH SIDE)
BUILDING FACE 42'
18'
PARKING
24'
DRIVE AISLE
CL
NOT TO SCALE
16'
103'
50'53'
35'34'
8'
8'
SDWK
EX R/W
NORTHERLY LINCOLN AVENUE
EXISTING
5'
10'
TYPICAL SECTION: LINCOLN AVENUE
5'
NOT TO SCALE
CL
13'13'
TYPICAL SECTION: SUNKIST STREET
90'
SITE
PROJECT
SITE
PROJECT
STA 1+75.00 TO STA 2+98.00 STA 1+88.00 TO STA 3+68.00
10'5'
58'
2%
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
2%
2%
6" CURB
EX R/W
SOUTHERLY
EX R/W
EASTERLY
EX R/W
WESTERLY
6'
MAX
3'
SECTION C-C
NOT TO SCALE
2%
EXISTING GROUND
SECTION B-B
PARKING
18'
42'
DRIVE AISLE
24'5'4'
55'
(WEST SIDE)
BUILDING FACE
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
0" CURBPROP. C&G 2%
MAX
3'
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION A-A
CL
53'
SDWK
LINCOLN AVENUE
EXISTING
5'
10'
5'
EX R/W
SOUTHERLY
1.5%
25'
MAX
1'
(NORTH SIDE)
BUILDING FACE
4" STEP
2%
4.5'
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
(FF PER PLAN)
FRONT DOOR
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION D-D
CL
5'5'
6'11'
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION D-D
CL
64'
LINCOLN AVENUE
EXISTING
EX R/W
SOUTHERLY
2%
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
2 :1
R/W
PROP
PROP RETAINING WALL
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
DRAINANGE SWALE
2%
NOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALE
SECTION E-E
20'
SETBACK
11.5 13.5
55'
SETBACK
(NORTH SIDE)
BUILDING FACE
1%
0" CURB
1%
MAX
2'
(FF PER PLAN)
FRONT DOOR
24'
DRIVE AISLE
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
2%SDWK
NOT TO SCALE
SECTION F-F
MAX
4.25'
MAX
4.25'
2.0% MAX
0.5% MIN -
VARIES
2.0% MAX
0.5% MIN -
VARIES
PKWY
LS
NEW
PKWY
LS
NEW
PKWY
LS
NEW
EX. CMU SCREEN WALL
2%
EXIST SDWK
5'
PKWY
LS
NEW
SDWK
NEW
12.5'
EXIST SDWK
REMOVE
EXIST SDWK
SDWK
NEW
9.5'
SDWK
EXIST
REMOVE
8'
TO REMAIN.
EXIST C&G
32'
45'
32'
45'
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
STAIRS
33'
2.5'
TO REMAIN.
EXIST C&G
BOUNDARY
TRACT
BOUNDARY
TRACT
MEDIAN
RAISED
EXIST
TO BE REMOVED.
EXIST C&G
DEDICATION
R/W
51'
54'
3'
NEW C&G
4'
SECTIONS
3
BUILDING FACE
BUILDING FACE
(GFF PER PLAN)
GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR (GFF PER PLAN)
GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR
(GFF PER PLAN)
GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR
(GFF PER PLAN)
GARAGE FINISHED FLOOR
EXIST CMU SCREEN WALL
EXIST CMU SCREEN WALL
NEW C&G
DRIVE AISLE
20'
14.25' (MIN)14.25' (MIN)
CL
(ALLEY)
COURT
COMMON
NOTE:
**
**
**
**
NOTE ON TITLE SHEET.
AND EGRESS RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. SEE EASEMENT
AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES INCLUDING INGRESS
TO BE DEDICATED PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS
WHERE SHOWN IN SECTION THIS SHEET:
TO REMAIN.
EXIST C&G
SUNKIST STREET
EXISTING
53'
CL
NOT TO SCALE
114'
50'53'
54'34'8'
SDWK
EX R/W
NORTHERLY LINCOLN AVENUE
EXISTING
11'
4'4'
5'5'
SDWK
R/W
PROP
DEDICATION
R/W
TYPICAL SECTION: LINCOLN AVENUE
SITE
PROJECT
STA 2+98.00 TO STA 5+83.00
EX R/W
SOUTHERLY
2%
PKWY
LS
NEW
TO BE REMOVED.
EXIST C&G
SDWK
EXIST
REMOVE
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
NEW C&G
*
FROM STA 2+98 TO 4+63.
TRANSITIONS FROM 43' TO 54'
*
EXIST RAISED MEDIAN
43'9.5'
CL
NOT TO SCALE
114'
50'53'
54'34'8'
SDWK
EX R/W
NORTHERLY
LINCOLN AVENUE
EXISTING
11'
4'4'
5'5'
SDWK
R/W
PROP
DEDICATION
R/W
TYPICAL SECTION: LINCOLN AVENUE
SITE
PROJECT
STA 5+83.00 TO STA 7+22.00
EX R/W
SOUTHERLY
2%
PKWY
LS
NEW
TO BE REMOVED.
EXIST C&G
NEW C&G
*
EXIST RAISED MEDIAN
*51'*
FROM STA 5+83 TO 6+34.
TRANSITIONS FROM 43' TO 51'
(4" THICK)
NEW SIDEWALK
*
SDWK
EXIST
REMOVE
9'
IMPROVEMENTS.
WIDENING
LIMIT OF STREET
FROM EXISTING C&G.
SAWCUT LINE 1-FOOT
IMPROVEMENTS.
WIDENING
LIMIT OF STREET
FROM EXISTING C&G.
SAWCUT LINE 1-FOOT
3'
1'
11'
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:38
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_03_Sections.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/2022
X
X
X
X
MHX
EV
X
X
X
X
X
X
EV
XSVAR
XEVXERTLRV
XTPB
X
TLRXEVX
EVX
XTPB
XTPBUVXWX
TLRX
EVX
XTPBEVX
XTPB
EV
X
X
XT
P
B UVXT
X
UV
X
XT
PB
E
V
X
EVXEVXER
TLRAC AC AC AC AC AC
ACAC
ACACACACACACACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
ACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC AC AC AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
191
192 193PROJECT BOUNDARYPROJECT BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAY
SETBACK
EXIST SCREEN WALLEXIST SCREEN WALLSETBACK
R3-5 (R) SIGN
R3-5 (R) SIGN
R6-1 (R) SIGN
L=36.11'
R=25.00°
|=82°45'49"
L=17.02'
R=2625.09°
|=0°22'17"
S
IGH
T
TR
IANG
LE
SIGHT TRIANGLESIGHT TRIANGLECOUNT
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
EX
IST
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
PROP
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
TO REMAIN.
AT&T CEV STRUCTURE
SEWER LIFT STATION
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:38
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_04_SitePlan.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/2022XS
XS
XS
XSNO PARKINGNO PARKINGVPIV
4
E
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
SUNKIST STREET103'24'18'90'24'11'24'
24'18'
24'
B B
1+00
2+00
3+
00
4+
00
5+00
6+00
7+
00
1+002+003+0010'24'18'10'24'9'
18'18'9'10'21.5'4'1
5'
15'
20'4'5'10.39'103'50'53'16'34'35'10'8'5'5'53'50'34'8'4'54'45'
45'
13'32'32'13'
C
A
20'20'20'
UN
IT
1
UN
IT
2
UN
IT
3
UN
IT
4
UN
IT
5
UN
IT
6
UN
IT
7
UN
IT
8
UN
IT
9
UN
IT
10
UN
IT
11
UN
IT
12
UN
IT
13
UN
IT
14
UN
IT
15
UN
IT
16
UN
IT
17
UN
IT
18
UN
IT
19
UNIT 20
UNIT 21
UNIT 22
UNIT 23
UNIT 24
UNIT 25
UNIT 26
UNIT 27
UNIT 28
UNIT 29
UNIT 30UNIT 31
UNIT 32
UNIT 33
UNIT 34
UNIT 35
UNIT 39
UNIT 36
UNIT 37
UNIT 38
UNIT 40
UNIT 41
UNIT 42
UNIT 43UNIT 44
UNIT 45
UNIT 46
UNIT 47UNIT 50
UNIT 51
UNIT 52
UNIT 53UNIT 54
UNIT 55
UNIT 56
UNIT 57
UNIT 58UNIT 59
UNIT 60
UNIT 61
UNIT 62
UNIT 63UNIT 64
UNIT 65
UNIT 66
UNIT 67
UNIT 68UNIT 69
UNIT 70
UNIT 71
UNIT 72
UNIT 73
UNIT 74
UNIT 75
UNIT 76
UNIT 77
UNIT 78UNIT 79
UNIT 80
UNIT 81
UNIT 82
UNIT 83
15
'
9'9'11.5'10'UNIT 48UNIT 49
3' (TYP.)
7'64'7'7'10'55'15'21.4' MIN
35.3' MIN
28.5' MIN
20' MIN
28.5' MIN
20' MIN
36.5' MIN
28' MIN 23.5' MIN
30.2' MIN 30.4'37.7'9'4'4'
PROPOSED ASPHALT CONCRETE
PROPOSED CONCRETE
REQUIRED SETBACK
TRACT BOUNDARY
LEGEND
9
9
10
87
10
10
9
D
5'
D
A
E
E
C
18'9'18'9'18'9'NEW DWY24'NEW
DWY
24
'
N89°13'50"W 615.13'
N
77
°58
'46
"W
613
.22
'
F F L=182.05'R=2715.09°|=3°50'30"N1°04'18"E 344.90'SITE PLAN11'S
IGH
T
TR
IANG
LE
0
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 30'
1530 30 60 90
BU
ILD
ING
1
BU
ILD
ING
2
BU
ILD
ING
3
BUILDING 4BUILDING 5
BUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 10
A A
A AAA
AA
A
7'70.5'TYPTYPTYPTYP TYP TYP TYP TYP2.5'2.5'24'4'2.5'24'4'DOG PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN8'9'9'10.5'
24'4'4'4'5'5'5'5'5'4'4'4'UNIT #UNIT NUMBER
BUILDING NUMBER
#
ACCESSIBLE UNIT
AC CONDENSER UNIT
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
BUILDING #
A
OPEN PARKING STALL
DECORATIVE STAMPED ASPHALT CONCRETE
R/W DEDICATIONPROPOSEDSETBACK20'TOT LOT 5'FFFF F F
E E
4'
E E
NOTE:
**
**
**
****************NOTE ON TITLE SHEET.
AND EGRESS RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. SEE EASEMENT
AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES INCLUDING INGRESS
TO BE DEDICATED PUBLIC EASEMENTS FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS
WHERE SHOWN IN PLAN THIS SHEET:
5'8'51'43'54'10'WIDENING IMPROVEMENTSLIMIT OF STREETWIDENING IMPROVEMENTSLIMIT OF STREETWIDENING IMPROVEMENTSLIMIT OF STREETCL TO EX CURBCL TO NEW CURB3'11'LOT 1
AND ELECTRICAL PANEL
SEWER LIFT STATION
EVXER
TLRX
X
X
X
MHX
EV
X
X
X
X
X
X
EV
XSVAR
XEVXERTLRV
XTPB
X
TLRXEVX
EVX
XTPB
XTPBUVXWX
TLRX
EVX
XTPBEVX
WX
XTPB
EV
X
X
XT
P
B UVXT
X
UV
X
XT
PB
E
V
X
EVXAC AC AC AC AC AC
ACAC
ACACACACACACACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
ACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC AC AC AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
EVX
XTPB
EVX
TLRX
X
XTPB
191
192 193R/WR
/W
R/WBOUNDARY
PROJECT
BOUNDARY
PROJECT
SWALE @ 0.4%
SWALE @ 0.4%TO REMAINEXISTING CURB & GUTTERNEW CURB & GUTTERTO BE RELOCATED
FIRE HYDRANT
STRUCTURE TO REMAIN
EXIST AT&T CEV
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
NEW CURB RAMP.
EXIST R/W
EXIST C&G
NEW C&G
PROPOSED R/W
CONTROLLER CABINET TO REMAIN.
EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL
RELOCATE TYPE 1-A SIGNAL POLE.
RELOCATE TYPE 1-A SIGNAL POLE.
EXIST R/W
P
R
OP
OSE
D
R/W(SHADED AREA)
25'x25' LINE OF SIGHT CLEAR ZONE
TO REMAIN.
EXIST CURB & GUTTER
TO REMAIN.
FIRE HYDRANT
POLE TO REMAIN.
EXIST TYPE 26A-3-100 SIGNAL
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN.
EXISTING TYPE 26A-3-100 SIGNAL POLE TO REMAIN.
EXIST EASEMENT (MWD)
EXIST EASEMENT (CITY)SAWCUT LINESAWCUT LINENEW C&G
0
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 30'
1530 30 60 90
5SUNKIST STREETE
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
103'90'24'24'18'5'53'50'45'
45'10'11'11'11'12'11'11'13'4'7'2'13'
13'32'32'
191.20 FL
191.70 TC
193.24 FL
193.74 TC
0
.
5%
(191.71) EG
(192.01) EG
(192.23) EG
(191.74) EG
(191.85) EG
(191.85) EG
(191.79) EG
(190.50) EG
(193.57) EG(194.48) EG(194.32) EG(194.07) EG(193.84) EG(193.73) EG(193.69) EG(193.44) EG(193.06) EG(192.97) EG(192.65) EG(192.51) EG(192.06) EGFS190.70195
.00
FF
194
.2
5
G
F
F1%FS-4"194.70E
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
0" CF
194.26 TC
0" CF
193.53 TC
193
.75
G
FF2%194
.80
FF
0" CF
193.53 TC
0" CF
194.13 TC
0" CF
194.83 TC
195
.7
0
FF
1%194
.90
G
FF FS192.50FS-4"195.40194
.4
0
G
F
F1%195
.2
0
FF
0" CF
194.23 TCFS191.93FS-4"194.90FS191.20FS-6"194.30193
.7
5
G
F
F2%1
94
.80
F
FFS-6"194.30FS191.301
9
4
.25
G
FF1%1
9
5
.0
0
FF FS-4"194.70FS191.83FS190.75FS190.82FS190.95FS191.11FS191.34FS191.52FS191.56FS191.74FS192.33193.98 FL
194.48 TC
194.88 FS
195.38 TC
194.30 FL
194.80 TCFS192.20FS192.15194
.2
5
G
FF
1
9
4
.2
5
G
FF
1
9
4
.2
5
G
F
F
193
.75
G
FF
1
93
.75
G
F
F
193
.7
5
G
FF
194
.2
5
G
FF
194
.2
5
G
FF
194
.2
5
G
FF
194
.90
G
FF
194
.90
G
FF
1
9
4
.9
0
G
FF
194
.90
G
FFFS-6"194.30FS-6"194.302%1
9
4
.80
FF
2%194
.80
FF
1%195
.00
F
FFS-4"194.70FS-4"194.70FS-4"194.701%1
95
.0
0
FF
1%195
.0
0
F
F FS-4"194.70FS192.02FS-4"195.40FS-4"195.40FS-4"195.40FS-4"195.401
9
5
.7
0
FF
1%195
.70
F
F
1%195
.7
0
F
F
1%1
9
5
.70
FF
1%FS-6"194.30195.30GFF1%
196.10
FF
195.10
FF
1%194.80GFF195.60
FF195.20GFF1%195.10GFF1%
195.60
FF195.00GFF1%
195.60
FF
194.90GFF1%
195.60
FF195.30GFF1%194.80GFF1%195.30GFF1%194.80GFF2%
195.45
FF
195.70
FF
195.05GFF194.95GFF195.20GFF1%195.10GFF1%195.00GFF1%
1%194.50GFF195.30
FF
193.60GFF2%
194.80
FF
193.00GFF1%193.20GFF1%193.30GFF1%193.40GFF1%193.50GFF1%194.50GFF1%194.30GFF1%193.50GFF1%
2%193.50GFF1%193.40GFF1%193.30GFF1%193.20GFF2%193.00GFF193.90GFF2%
194.80
FF
194.80
FF
193.80
FF
193.80
FF 193.80GFF1%193.70GFF1%193.60GFF1%193.40GFF1%
193.80
FF
194.80
FF
194.80
FF
193.90GFF2%194.30GFF1%
1%1%
1%1%
1%
2%193.80GFF1%
1%194.20GFF193.80GFF194.10GFF194.00GFF193.40GFF193.70GFF193.60GFF194.30GFF1%194.20GFF1%194.10GFF1%194.00GFF1%193.80GFF194.70GFF1%
1%
1%
1%194.60GFF194.50GFF194.40GFF194.20GFF194.60GFF195.00GFF194.90GFF1%194.80GFF1%194.60GFF1%194.50GFF1%194.40GFF1%194.20GFF1%
193.86 FL
194.36 TCFS-4"194.70FS-4"194.70195
.0
0
FF
1%195
.0
0
FF
1%1
95
.00
FF
1%194
.8
0
F
F
2%24'0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%193.57 FL
194.07 TC
194.10 FS
194.51 TC
1.0%194.55 FS
195.13 FL
195.20GFF195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.70
FF
1%
1%
1%
194.50 FL
194.83 TC FS-4"195.80FS-4"195.30FS-4"194.80FS-4"195.30FS-4"195.30FS-4"195.30191.25 FL
191.75 TC
0.5%
0.5%1.0%0.5%0.5%0.5%
24'1.0%2.0%0
.5%
0
.5%
0
.5%0.5%1.0%1.0%1.0%193.08 FL
193.58 TC
193.72 FL
194.22 TC
191.90 FL
192.40 TC FS(190.70)FS(190.50)6.1%5.0%
192.10 FL
192.60 TC
193.30 FL
193.80 TC4.5%0.5%193.50 FL
194.00 TC
191.60 FL 1.0%1.0%0.5%194.26 FS
194.76 TC1.5%
191.96 FL
192.46 TC
0" CF
194.26 TC
0" CF
192.48 TC
0" CF
192.95 TC
192.68 FS
8" CF
193.27 TC
8" CF
193.09 TC
193.39 FL
FL
193.80
2.0%193.80
FF
2.0%194.20
FF
194.20
FF
193.89 FL
2.0%194.60
FF
194.60
FF
1%2%
194.90
FF
194.90
FF
194.21 FL
194.54 TC
195.20
FF
195.00
FF
195.00
FF
195.20
FF
195.00
FF
2%1%
195.70
FF
191.05 FL
FL
194.20
1
2
3
4
6
5
7 PAINT PARKING STALL STRIPING.
CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC CONCRETE SIDEWALK (WIDTH PER PLAN).
CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER (TYPE A2-6) PER SPPWC STD 120-2 (W=1.5').
CONSTRUCT 6" PCC CURB (TYPE A1-6) PER SPPWC STD 120-2.
CONSTRUCT 3' WIDE PCC RIBBON GUTTER PER SPPWC STD PLAN 122-2.
CONSTRUCT 0" PCC CURB (TYPE A1-6) PER SPPWC STD 120-2.
GRADING CONSTRUCTION NOTES GRADING CONSTRUCTION NOTES
6
6
3
3
12 4 4
4 4
6
4 4
2
4
6
4
5
4
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4 4
2
:1
2
:1 FS192.594.9%194.22 FS
1.5%19419
4
1
9
3
19219
3
19419
2191
193
5.0%1
1 1 1 1
1
1
1
1
1
GRADING PLAN
1
3
3
3NEW DWYNEW
DWY
8 8 8
8
194.44 FS
193.53 FS
193.09 FS
7
(TYP)
7
(TYP)
193.22 FL
193.72 TC
192.75 FL
193.25 TC
192.36 FL
192.86 TC
192.30 FL
192.80 TC191.62 FL
192.12 TC
192.77 FL
193.27 TC
193.49 FS
192.65 FL
193.15 TC
193.74 FL
194.24 TC
193.43 FS
190.90 FL
191.98 FL
192.48 TC 193.42 FL
193.92 TC
5
(193.37) TC
(193.08) TC
(192.80) TC
(192.63) TC(192.31) TC(192.14) TC(191.93) TC(191.60) TC(191.16) TC(190.99) TC(190.63) TC(190.51) TC2
:1
2
6
9
9
8
9
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS.
CONSTRUCT 4" AC OVER 6" AB PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION PER
SCORING PER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S PLAN.
SECTION PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. COLOR &
CONSTRUCT 6" THICK REINFORCED PCC CONCRETE PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL
CONSTRUCT 4" ROLLED CURB.
10 CONSTRUCT PCC DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY OF ANAHEIM STD PLAN 115-B.
10
10(190.82) TCDETAIL: CURB RETURN AREA
(SW CORNER LINCOLN & SUNKIST)
SCALE: 1"=10'
32'32'1941
9
4
194
194193192
1945
5
5
5
5
11 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE DITCH.43'43'43'51'10'10'10'54'10'54'3'2.0%
CONSTRUCT 8" PCC CURB (TYPE A1-8) PER SPPWC STD 120-2.12
13 CONSTRUCT TRAFFIC SPEED BUMP.
13 1313
13
XS
XS
XS
XSNO PARKINGNO PARKINGVPIV
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:38
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_05_PrelimGrd.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/20223'
EVXER
TLREVXX
X
X
X
MHX
EV
X
X
X
X
X
X
XSVAR
XEVXERTLRV
XTPB
X
TLRXEVX
EVX
XTPB
XTPBUVXWX
TLRX
EVX
XTPBEVX
WX
XTPB
EV
X
X
XT
P
B UVXT
X
UVX
XT
PB
E
V
X
EVXAC AC AC AC AC AC
ACAC
ACACACACACACACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
ACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC AC AC AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
EV
X
X
XTPB
XTLR
UVXUVX
XT
P
B
T
X
X
X
E
V
X
XT
PB
X
EVX
TLRX
XTPB
X
TPB
X
X
X
EVX
XTPB
EVX
XTPB
TLRX
TX
XS
X
X
X
PROJECT BOUNDARYPROJECT BOUNDARYR
IGH
T
OF
WAY
RIGHT OF WAY
EX
IST
8
" C
IP
WATE
R
EXIST GAS
EX
IST
TELE
PHON
E
EX
IST
ELE
CTR
ICEX
IST
16
" D
IP
WATE
R
EXIST 16" CCP WATER
EX
IST
48
" STORM
DRA
IN
EXIST 8" VCP SEWER
AREA= 124 SF
BIOINFILTRATION W/O UNDERDRAIN
BMP #4
AREA= 89 SF
BIOINFILTRATION W/O UNDERDRAIN
BMP #3
85" WSP WATER
TO BE RELOCATED
FIRE HYDRANT
OPT
IC
CABLE
EX
IST
F
IBER
VENT TO BE RELOCATED (MWD)
EXIST AIR RELEASE VALVE (MWD) TO REMAIN.
STRUCTURE TO REMAIN
EXIST AT&T CEV
EX
IST
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
PROP
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
PANEL
CONTROL
0
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 30'
1530 30 60 90
6
1
2
4
22
4" WATER VALVE6
7
11
12
21
5 END CAP
23
3 4" DOMESTIC WATER MAIN AWWA C900 PVC PIPE
13
14 CLEAN-OUT
22
21
13
13
12
12
3
2
22
5
14
14
31
15 MANHOLE
15
15103'24'90'24'24'
23'
5'
24'
24'
E
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
SUNKIST STREET32
33
34
CURB INLET
CLEAN OUT
10'11'24'24'14
2
2 2
23'15'4'5'11'7'6'
5'11'11'6'7'12'7'23'
5'
11'5'
11'11'
12
12
12
12
12
0.5%
1.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%2.0%0.5
%15" SD
190.38 FL
18" SD
189.11 FL
18" SD
188.00 FL
18" SD
186.87 FL
18" SD
188.09 FL
12" SD
185.66 FL
1
.0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5
%0.5%0
.5%
31
46
46
33
33
33
33
34
34
3
0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%0.5%320.5%
0
.5%
0
.5%
0.
5
%0.5%12" SD
187.10 FL
32
32
32
32
32
14
46
46
46
43
45
8 WATER AIR RELEASE VALVE
43
35 2424 BROOKS BOX
35
35
35
35
36 6.25'x18.5' MC-3500 STORM TECH
37
36 37
(SUNTREE TECHNOLOGIES MODEL NO: NSBB-HVT-2-4)
PRETREATMENT NUTRIENT SEPARATING BAFFLE BOX
(SUNTREE TECHNOLOGIES MODEL NO: NSBB-HVT-3-6)
PRETREATMENT NUTRIENT SEPARATING BAFFLE BOX38
39
INSTALLED INSIDE GRATE INLET.
TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE (BIO CLEAN HYDRA CP- U-3.7)
39
196.10
FF
195.60
FF
195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.20
FF
195.70
FF 195.10
FF
195.60
FF
195.60
FF
195.60
FF195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.70
FF
195.20
FF
195.70
FF
195.00
FF
195.00
FF
194.60
FF
194.60
FF
194.20
FF
194.20
FF
194.80
FF
194.80
FF
193.80
FF
193.80
FF
194.80
FF
194.80
FF
193.80
FF
193.80
FF
195.30
FF
194.80
FF
1
95
.0
0
FF
195
.00
F
F
195
.00
F
F
195
.00
FF
1
9
4
.80
FF
1
94
.8
0
FF
1
94
.80
FF
1
94
.8
0
F
F
1
9
4
.8
0
F
F
1
9
5
.0
0
FF
195
.0
0
FF
195
.0
0
FF
1
95
.00
FF
195
.2
0
FF
1
9
5
.7
0
FF
195
.70
F
F
195
.7
0
F
F
1
9
5
.70
FF
195
.7
0
FF
12" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE
16
4
7'11'6'
33
UTILITY PLAN
SEWER NOTES (PRIVATE)
STORM DRAIN NOTES (PRIVATE)
WATER NOTES (PRIVATE)
21
10
16
23
23
23
38
POST INDICATOR VALVE
(186.41) IE
(193.82) RIM
EX SEW MH
188.41 IE
SEW CO
11
TYP1
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
1
TYP
11
TYP
15" SD
188.25 FL
12" SD
186.60 FL
EXIST INLET
CONNECT TO
186.90 FL
12" SD
190.56 FL
12" SD
190.72 FL
191.83 FL
194.50 TG
191.59 FL
194.50 TG
186.85 FL
190.82 TG
188.48 FL
192.62 TG
189.04 FL
192.36 TG
180.40 IE
194.29 RIM
SEW MH
185.64 IE
191.99 RIM
SEW MH
181.04 IE
193.99 RIM
SEW MH
183.75 IE
194.78 RIM
SEW MH
183.11 IE
195.10 FS
SEW CO
184.45 IE
194.49 FS
SEW CO185.33 IE
194.08 FS
SEW CO
186.18 IE
193.68 FS
SEW CO
187.40 IE
193.34 FS
SEW CO
187.69 FL
35
189.81 FL
193.40 TG
(OUT)
182.10 FL
185.30 FL
192.40 TG
35
186.66 IE
SEW CO
16
35
189.22 FL
192.70 TG
0
.5%
0
.5%32
35
191.80 FL
194.50 TG
4
4'
8
13
1.5" BACKFLOW PREVENTER
11'4'4'4'
18" SD
185.56 FL
WATER BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY
2" COPPER WATER MAIN
1" COPPER WATER SERVICE LATERAL AND 1" METER
TO A SINGLE 4" WATER MAIN.
2-2" SERVICE LATERAL & METER MANIFOLDED17
WATER NOTES (PUBLIC)
20 6" FIRE SERVICE LATERAL.
20
20
17
17
3
1.5" IRRIGATION LATERAL AND METER.9
4" BACKFLOW PREVENTER
4" SEWER HOUSE LATERAL
6" FIRE SERVICE MAIN AWWA C900 PVC PIPE
6" DCDA BACKFLOW PREVENTER
FIRE HYDRANT (PRIVATE)
21
3
3
14 14 14
2
2
2 2 2
2
12
14
23 21
15
15
12
12
12
14
24 RELOCATE MANHOLE VENT (METROPOLITION WATER DISTRICT)
24
1
.0%
14
188.05 IE
SEW CO
2
2
9
10
15.8'x70.8' MC-3500 STORM TECH
40 TRENCH DRAIN
40
40
41 4" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE
418'11'7'42
42
SC-310 STORM TECH (24 CHAMBERS).
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM.
34
15" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE43
4315" SD
189.00 FL
44
44
INVERT OF PLATE OPENING TO MATCH INVERT OF 15' OUTLET.
INSTALL PLATE ON 15" OUTLET WITH 14.5" DIAMETER OPENING.
7
45
OUTLET PIPE TO CONNECT TO CURB INLET STRUCTURE.
6" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE. DETENTION SYSTEM UNDERDRAIN
15" SD
189.00 FL
6" SD
188.50 FL
6" SD
188.20 FL
46 18" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE
32 32 32
32
43
46
18" SD
188.96 FL
18" SD
188.55 FL
18" SD
189.35 FL
35
190.84 FL
194.45 TG
35
189.83 FL
193.52 TG35
189.44 FL
193.13 TG
35
189.03 FL
192.72 TG
195.70
FF
195.45
FF
195.00
FF
195.20
FF
194.90
FF
194.90
FF
16 SEWER LIFT STATION
1.0%
1.0%
177.40 BOT
180.00 IE (IN)
194.60 RIM
SEWER LIFT STATION
6" SEWER MAIN
8" SEWER MAIN
XS
XS
XS
XS VPIV
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:38
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_06_PrelimUtl.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/2022
X
X
X
X
MHX
EV
X
X
X
X
X
X
EV
XSVAR
XEVXERTLRV
XTPB
X
TLRXEVX
EVX
XTPB
XTPBUVXWX
TLRX
EVX
XTPBEVX
XTPB
EV
X
X
XT
P
B UVXT
X
UV
X
XT
PB
E
V
X
EVXEVXER
TLRAC AC AC AC AC AC
ACAC
ACACACACACACACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
ACAC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC AC AC AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC
AC
AC
AC
AC
AC AC AC
AC
AC
AC
191
192 193PROJECT BOUNDARYPROJECT BOUNDARYRIGHT OF WAY
EXIST SCREEN WALLEXIST SCREEN WALLTO BE RELOCATED
FIRE HYDRANT
EXIST 16" CCP WATER
85" WSP WATER
TO REMAIN
EXISTING FH
EX
IST
16
" D
IP
WATE
R
EX
IST
8
" C
IP
WATE
R
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
EX
IST
R
IGH
T
OF
WAY
6" DCDA
PROPOSED
6" DCDA
PROPOSED
EXIST RIGHT OF WAY
TO REMAIN.
FIRE HYDRANT
INIT.DATE DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE
SHEET OF
SITE ADDRESS:
SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:
PREPARED BY:OWNER OR DEVELOPER:
SOILS ENGINEER:
REVISIONS
NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
STAT
EOF CALIFORNIAREGISTEREDPROFESSIONAL
E
NGI
NEERNo.46568
A R A
BRY C
OWNJGH JGH
02-NOV-2022 14:38
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\ORN CorpStds 2005.dscript
C:\RICK\Projects\C19000\19467_KB-Lincoln\Civil\PlanSets\Entitlement Plans\19467_07_Fire.dgn
J-19467
AS NOTED
7
DATE:
PHONE: (949) 442-2442
CONTACT:
IRVINE, CA 92614
17991 FITCH
NMG GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
PHONE: (858) 877-4262
CONTACT: JESSE KLEIST
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD, SUITE 100
KB HOME COASTAL
2420-2450 E. LINCOLN AVENUE, ANAHEIM, CA 92806
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19237
DATE: 11/2/2022XS
XS
XS
XSNO PARKINGNO PARKINGVPIV
7
E
. L
INCO
LN
AV
ENU
E
SUNKIST STREET103'24'18'90'24'11'24'
24'
24'24'1+00
2+00
3+
00
4+
00
5+00
6+00
7+
00
1+002+003+0010'24'18'10'24'18'10'21.5'1
5'
15'
20'10.39'103'50'53'16'34'8'53'50'34'8'4'55'45'
45'
13'32'
32'13'
20'20'20'
24'
UN
IT
1
UN
IT
2
UN
IT
3
UN
IT
4
UN
IT
5
UN
IT
6
UN
IT
7
UN
IT
8
UN
IT
9
UN
IT
10
UN
IT
11
UN
IT
12
UN
IT
13
UN
IT
14
UN
IT
15
UN
IT
16
UN
IT
17
UN
IT
18
UN
IT
19
UNIT 20
UNIT 21
UNIT 22
UNIT 23
UNIT 24
UNIT 25
UNIT 26
UNIT 27
UNIT 28
UNIT 29
UNIT 30UNIT 31
UNIT 32
UNIT 33
UNIT 34
UNIT 35
UNIT 39
UNIT 36
UNIT 37
UNIT 38
UNIT 40
UNIT 41
UNIT 42
UNIT 43UNIT 44
UNIT 45
UNIT 46
UNIT 47UNIT 50
UNIT 51
UNIT 52
UNIT 53UNIT 54
UNIT 55
UNIT 56
UNIT 57
UNIT 58UNIT 59
UNIT 60
UNIT 61
UNIT 62
UNIT 63UNIT 64
UNIT 65
UNIT 66
UNIT 67
UNIT 68UNIT 69
UNIT 70
UNIT 71
UNIT 72
UNIT 73
UNIT 74
UNIT 75
UNIT 76
UNIT 77
UNIT 78UNIT 79
UNIT 80
UNIT 81
UNIT 82
UNIT 83
15
'11.5'10'UNIT 48UNIT 49 20'21.4' MIN
35.3' MIN
28.5' MIN
20' MIN
28.5' MIN
20' MIN
36.5' MIN
28' MIN 23.5' MIN
30.2' MIN 30.4'37.7'TRACT BOUNDARY
UNIT #UNIT NUMBER
LEGEND
FIRE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENT
BUILDING NUMBER
R=20'
R=40'NEW DWY24'NEW
DWY
24
'
FIRE PLAN11'PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS
DESIGNATED FIRE LANE
FIRE SERVICE LINE
POST INDICATOR VALVE
FS
FIRELANE
24'0
GRAPHIC SCALE 1" = 30'
1530 30 60 90
BU
ILD
ING
1
BU
ILD
ING
2
BU
ILD
ING
3
BUILDING 4BUILDING 5
BUILDING 6BUILDING 7BUILDING 8BUILDING 9BUILDING 10
BUILDING #
AA
PIV
2) BUILDINGS 1-4 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER NFPA 13D.
3) BUILDINGS 5-10 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER NFPA 13.
4) ON-SITE FIRE LINE AND APPURTENANCES ARE PRIVATE AND PER NFPA 24.15'5' NEW SDWKSETBACKR/W DEDICATIONPROPOSEDFIRE LANEFIRE LANEFIRE LANEFIRE LANE55' SETBACKFIRE LANE
FIRE LANE
FIRE LANEFIRE LANE LOAD OF 78,000 LBS AND SURFACED TO PROVIDE ALL-WEATHER ACCESS.
5) ALL ON-SITE DESIGNATED FIRE LANES WILL BE DESIGNED TO SUPPORT A
FIRE NOTES
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.
1) ALL BUILDINGS ARE 3-STORY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH AUTOMATIC
TRAVEL PATH FROM FIRE HYDRANT
DISTANCE
300'
110'
250'
300'
300'
300'
300'
260'
250'10'5'5'33'270'
300'
LINCOLN
A
V
E
.S. SUNKIST STREET1
2
3
456789
10
A A
A
A A A A A A
40'31'PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE
STREET & PARKING TREES
BOTANICAL NAMESYMBOL COMMON NAME
PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR
KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA
PISTACIA CHINENSIS
PINUS CANARIENSIS
MAGNOLIA SPP.
FERN PINE
GOLDENRAIN TREE
CHINESE PISTACHE 4
CANARY ISLAND PINE 13
MAGNOLIA
JACARANDA SPP.
OLEA 'WILSONII'
MAGNOLIA G. 'RUSSET'
MULTI TRUNK TREES (36" - 48" BOX
JACARANDA SPP. 8
OLIVE SPP.
RUSSET MAGNOLIA
THEME / SCREEN TREES (15 GAL - 24" BOX)
MONDEL PINE
BOTTLE TREE
BRISBANE BOX 25
PINUS ELDARICA
BRACHYCHITON POPULNEUS
LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS
ACCENT TREES (24" - 36" BOX)
ARBUTUS HYBRID
PALO VERDE 13
AFRICAN SUMAC
ORNAMENTAL PEAR
FLOWERING PLUM 31
ARBUTUS 'MARINA'
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’
RHUS LANCEA
PYRUS C. 'CHANTICLEER'
PRUNUS C. 'KRAUTER VESUVIUS'
PALM TREES (24" - 36" BOX)
QUEEN PALM 21
DATE PALM
SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANUM
PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA
VERTICAL ACCENT TREES (15 GAL - 24" BOX)
JUNIPER SPP.
CYPRESS SPP. 5
LONG LEAFED
YELLOWWOOD
JUNIPERUS SPP.
CUPRESSUS SPP.
PODOCARPUS 'HENKELII'
(COLUMNAR)
RHAPHIOLEPIS I. 'MAJESTIC BEAUTY'
PHOTINIA FRASERI
PRUNUS C. 'BRIGHT N TIGHT'
PATIO ACCENT TREES (100% - 15 GAL)
INDIAN HAWTHORN 25
N.C.N.
FLOWERING PLUM VAR. 26
CANARY ISLAND PINE (7)
CALIFORNIA PEPPER (1)
SUNKIST STREET TREES (2)
EXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN IF POSSIBLE)
QTY.
TURF - MARATHON IIe SOD
AGAVE SPP.
ARBUTUS UNEDO 'COMPACTA'
BOUGAINVILLEA SPP.
BUXUS SPP.
CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN'
DIANELLA
DIETES SPP.
DIOSMA PULCHRUM
DODONEA V. 'PURPUREA'
ELAEAGNUS P. VARIEGATA
GAZANIA SPP.
GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS
GREVILLEA LANIGERA
GREWIA OCCIDENTALIS
HEMEROCALLIS SPP.
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA
JUNIPERUS SPP.
LANTANA 'YELLOW'
LEONOTIS LEONORUS
LIGUSTRUM J. 'TEXANUM'
PHORMIUM SPP.
PITTOSPORUM SPP.
RAPHIOLEPIS SPP.
ROSA ICE BERG SPP.
ROSMARINUS SPP.
SALVIA SPP.
SEDUM SPP.
SENECIUM MANDRALISCAE
TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES
COMMON H.O.A. AREA SHRUBS / VINES / GROUNDCOVER
(40% 5 gal, 60% 1 gal. min, with flatted groundcover) such as:
AGAVE
DWARF STRAWBERRY TREE
BOUGAINVILLEA - N.C.N.
BOXWOOD SPP.
BOTTLE BRUSH SPP.
FLAX LILY
FORTNIGHT LILY
BREATH OF HEAVEN
HOPSEED BUSH
N.C.N.
GAZANIA - N.C.N.
CAROLINA JESSAMINE
GREVILLEA - N.C.N.
LAVENDER STARFLOWER
DAYLILY SPP.
YUCCA
JUNIPERUS SPP.
NEW GOLD LANTANA
LION'S TAIL
JAPANESE PRIVET
NEW ZEALAND FLAX SPP.
PITTOSPORUM SPP.
RAPHIOLEPIS - N.C.N.
FLORIBUNDA ROSE
ROSEMARY SPP.
SAGE SPP.
STONECROP
BLUE CHALKSTICKS
STAR JASMINE
A A
AA
0
SCALE - 1" = 30'-0"
15' 30' 60' 90'NORTH
COMMUNITY GARDEN
SEE SEPARATE ENLARGEMENT PLAN
COMMUNITY DOG PARK
SEE SEPARATE ENLARGEMENT PLANEXISTING PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT
EXISTING MASONRY
WALL ON WEST P.L.
TO REMAIN
HANDICAPPED PARKING
STALL - TYP.
TOT-LOT & FITNESS AREA
COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE AREA
SEE ENLARGEMENT SHEET
DRIVE LANE W/
ENHANCED PAVING - TYP.
ENHANCED ENTRY PAVING - TYP.
(STAMPED ASPHALT BY STREET PRINT)
15' - 20' SETBACK LINEA
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404
Bonsall, CA 92003
760.724.1198ARCHITECTURE
FEBRUARY 11, 2022KB HOME
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
858.877.4256
ANAHEIM, CA LINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMES
28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202
TEMECULA, CA 92590
P (844) WEILAND, XT 701 F (619) 675-3426
EMAIL - KLONIGRO@W-D-G.COM
CORPORATE OFFICE
291 SIERRA WAVE SWALL MEADOWS, CA 93514
OVERALL LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN
LC-01
3' HEIGHT VINYL FENCE AT PRIVATE FRONT YARDS - TYP.
(BLDG.'S 1, 2, 3 AND 5)
STREET TREES - TYP.
ACCENT/ THEME TREES - TYP.
3' HT. VINYL FENCE
HANDICAPPED PARKING
STALL - TYP.
ENHANCED ENTRY PAVING - TYP.
(STAMPED ASPHALT BY STREET PRINT)
ENHANCED ASPHALT PAVING - TYP.
(STAMPED ASPHALT BY STREET PRINT)
EXISTING AND PROPOSED R.O.W. -TYP.
EXISTING AND
PROPOSED R.O.W. -TYP.
EXISTING AND
PROPOSED R.O.W. -TYP.
EXISTING AND
PROPOSED R.O.W. -TYP.
ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE PUBLIC R.O.W.
THROUGHOUT THE SITE (SEE ARCH. PLANS SHT. A-3)
ENHANCED 'STREET PRINT'
PATH OF TRAVEL - TYP.
PROPOSED MAILBOX AND
PARCEL BOX LOCATIONS
SEE ENLARGEMENT SHEET
15' - 20' SETBACK LINE
7'x50' L.O.S. (CITY DET. 115-B) CLEAR ZONE
LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT EXCEED THE 24" MAX.
HEIGHT LIMITATION (BOTH ENTRIES)
25'x25' L.O.S. CLEAR ZONE AT
INTERSECTION FROM ULTIMATE
ROW. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT
EXCEED THE 24" HEIGHT LIMITATION
ENHANCED METAL VINE TRELLIS
(PAINTED DARK BROWN) WITH
5 GAL. VINE - TYP.
(SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS)
ENHANCED METAL VINE TRELLIS
(PAINTED DARK BROWN) WITH
5 GAL. VINE - TYP.
(SEE ARCHITECTURE PLANS)
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
AT PARKING EDGE - TYP.
UNDERGROUND STORM
DRAIN FILTRATION TANKS
PER CIVIL PLANS
EXISTING AT&T CABINET
AND CONCRETE PAD TO
REMAIN PER CIVIL PLANS
7'x50' L.O.S. (CITY DET. 115-B) CLEAR ZONE
LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT EXCEED THE 24"
MAX. HEIGHT LIMITATION (BOTH ENTRIES)
ADA UNIT - 9 TOTAL
PROPOSED CONCRETE OVERFLOW
SWALE PER CIVIL PLANS
PROPOSED CONCRETE OVERFLOW
SWALE PER CIVIL PLANS
WATER QUALITY BASIN
- TYP.
OVERFLOW WATER QUALITY
TANKS PER CIVIL PLANS
PROPOSED 1.5" IRRIGATION SERVICE LINE, WATER METER &
BACKFLOW PREVENTER - SEE CIVIL UTILITY PLAN NUMBER 9 & 10
31' TO EXISTING
CANARY ISLAND PINE
UTILITY SCREENING EXHIBIT SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
WATER AIR RELEASE VALVE - TYP.
SCREEN W/ LANDSCAPE
A/C SCREEN - 3' VINYL LATTICE SCREEN
ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE - TYP.
MEDIUM HT. SHRUB LANDSCAPE SCREENING - TYP.
(A/C UNITS & ADDITIONAL ABOVE-GROUND
UTILITIES - COORD. W/ CIVIL)
W/ LANDSCAPE SCREENING
40' TREE CLEARANCE
PER CITY STD. 530-A
Rev. 8/18/22, 9/13/22
EXISTING MASONRY
WALL ON SOUTH P.L.
TO REMAIN
COMMUNITY DOG PARK COMMUNITY GARDEN
COMMUNITY OPEN-SPACE AREA
BENCH SEATING & TRASH
RECEPTACLES - TYP.
RAISED GARDEN BOXES - TYP.
MULCH BINS - TYP.
CONCRETE WALK
ARTIFICIAL TURF
TUBULAR STEEL FENCE WITH GATE
DOGGY BAG PEDESTAL
BENCH SEATING & TRASH
RECEPTACLES - TYP.
OPEN-SPACE LAWN
COMMUNITY SEATING AREA W/
LOUNGING FURNITURE OVER
SYNTHETIC TURN.
COMMUNITY OPEN-SPACE AREA WITH
GAS/ PROPANE BBQ AND SHADE
STRUCTURE WITH TABLE AND CHAIRS
SEATING
TOT-LOT & FITNESS AREA WITH BENCH SEATING
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404
Bonsall, CA 92003
760.724.1198ARCHITECTURE
FEBRUARY 11, 2022KB HOME
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
858.877.4256
ANAHEIM, CA LINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMES
28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202
TEMECULA, CA 92590
P (844) WEILAND, XT 701 F (619) 675-3426EMAIL - KLONIGRO@W-D-G.COM
CORPORATE OFFICE
291 SIERRA WAVE SWALL MEADOWS, CA 93514
ENHANCED STAMPED
ASPHALT PAVING AT
COMMON AREAS - TYP.
CONCRETE MOW CURB - TYP.
ENLARGEMENT CONCEPT PLAN
LC-02
0 5' 10' 20' 30'
SCALE - 1" = 10'-0"
NORTH
CONCRETE WALK THROUGH
COMMON AREA - TYP.CONCRETE WALK THROUGH
COMMON AREA - TYP.
COMMUNITY MAILBOX AREA
(2'X21' CONCRETE PAD) WITH
20 MIN. GREEN CARRIER &
RESIDENCE PARKING - TYP.WALL-MOUNTED VINE TRELLIS - TYP.
(FINAL LOCATIONS PER ELEVATIONS)
ENTRY WALK WITH ADA RAMP
ENTRY WALK WITH ADA RAMP
ENHANCED STAMPED ASPHALT PAVING AT
COMMON AREAS - TYP.
MULTI-TRUNK SPECIMEN
TREES - TYP.
SPECIMEN PALM TREES - TYP.
CURVED SEAT WALLS - TYP.
OVERFLOW WATER QUALITY
TANKS PER CIVIL PLANS
Rev. 8/18/22, 9/13/22
CANOPY TREE
VERTICAL PALM
VERTICAL TREES
ACCENT TREE
ACCENT SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS
HEDGE SHRUBS
LOW - MEDIUM SHRUBS
VINES
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404
Bonsall, CA 92003
760.724.1198ARCHITECTURE
FEBRUARY 11, 2022KB HOME
9915 MIRA MESA BLVD., STE 100
SAN DIEGO, CA 92131
858.877.4256
ANAHEIM, CA LINCOLN & SUNKIST TOWNHOMES
28924 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, SUITE 202TEMECULA, CA 92590
P (844) WEILAND, XT 701 F (619) 675-3426
EMAIL - KLONIGRO@W-D-G.COM
CORPORATE OFFICE
291 SIERRA WAVE SWALL MEADOWS, CA 93514
PLANT PALETTE
LC-03
Rev. 8/18/22, 9/13/22
Luminaire ScheduleTypeSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLLFDescriptionLum. LumensLum. WattsTotal WattsA110ANP EQ111 T3 (Post Top Light)Single0.920LIGHT: EQ111-1-E030LD-T3-30K-HSS150-1-FM3-72POLE: BD3STLS12-7-BDC-72340330300A22ANP EQ111 T5 (Post Top Light)Single0.920LIGHT: EQ111-1-E030LD-T5-30K-HSS150-1-FM3-72POLE: BD3STLS12-7-BDC-7232763060B111ANP EQ BL0121 (Bollard)Single0.920BL0121-CL-A018LD4-T2-30K-72165818198T14Teron Chaparral (Trellis Light)Single0.920CHL-L5.3-120/277-MFL-BZ-30K4835.321.2W1133Typical Building LightSingle0.920MAXIM 65753 (Placeholder)39181064Calculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinVEHICLE HARDSCAPEIlluminanceFc0.562.40.15.60COMMON SPACEIlluminanceFc3.9525.20.139.50LINCOLN & SUNKIST LIGHTING CONCEPTUAL PLAN Feb 07, 202201of 05SUMMARIES AND SCHEDULESSHEET INDEX1 SUMMARIES & SCHEDULES2 LIGHTING PLAN3 SPECIFICATION: SITE LIGHT4 SPECIFICATION: BOLLARD LIGHT5 SPECIFICATION: TRELLIS LIGHTSITE LOCATIONANAHEIM, CAKEy MAPNʒTʒSʒLINCOLN AVES SUNKIST STREETSHEET 2MAKE: TERON LIGHTINGMODEL: CHAPARRAL BULLET LIGHT ˫ ɾʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 4wATTAGE: 5ʒ3SPEC: SHEET 05MAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: BL0121 BOLLARD ˫ 3ʒ5ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 11wATTAGE: 1ɾ ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 04MAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: EX111 POST TOP ˫ 14ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 12wATTAGE: 30 ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 03
0.43.51.50.30.74.40.40.21.810.915.13.00.30.21.712.517.63.00.51.62.07.611.33.00.50.54.725.210.00.8 0.3 2.514.413.32.20.41.47.812.03.20.50.32.614.912.72.00.30.86.519.45.90.80.40.10.40.40.30.50.60.10.30.20.20.20.20.20.20.55.91.40.30.20.31.10.86.63.40.60.10.11.04.05.94.32.63.11.21.83.13.31.07.92.34.18.20.4 1.0 1.8 1.2 1.8 1.2 0.61.2 1.8 1.2 1.9 1.20.3 0.3 0.6 1.4 1.7 1.4 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.20.2 0.4 1.1 1.8 1.2 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.30.2 0.2 0.5 1.3 1.8 1.2 1.8 1.0 0.40.3 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.50.9 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.90.3 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.10.2 0.3 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.30.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.4 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.40.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.60.60.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.40.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.81.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.2 0.2 0.41.0 0.6 0.60.5 0.3 0.30.5 0.3 0.30.7 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.50.5 0.3 0.31.8 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.20.2 0.3 0.71.5 0.5 0.82.1 0.4 0.62.4 0.5 0.50.4 0.3 0.3 0.81.4 0.4 0.51.2 1.3 0.6 0.30.4 0.3 0.81.0 0.5 0.71.1 0.5 0.61.1 0.5 0.50.2 0.3 0.81.0 0.4 0.41.8 1.3 0.6 0.40.6 0.4 0.91.1 0.5 0.71.3 0.5 0.71.4 0.5 0.60.20.3 0.81.1 0.4 0.61.1 0.8 0.4 0.30.7 0.4 0.60.6 0.4 0.50.7 0.4 0.50.8 0.4 0.40.1 0.2 0.50.6 0.3 0.40.5 0.4 0.3 0.30.8 0.4 0.60.8 0.3 0.50.9 0.4 0.51.3 0.4 0.40.1 0.2 0.50.8 0.3 0.60.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.5 0.3 0.50.6 0.3 0.40.7 0.4 0.40.7 0.4 0.40.1 0.2 0.40.6 0.3 0.40.2 0.2 0.2 0.20.7 0.4 0.70.9 0.4 0.61.1 0.4 0.61.7 0.5 0.50.1 0.2 0.70.9 0.4 0.50.3 0.2 0.2 0.30.5 0.4 0.71.0 0.4 0.61.1 0.4 0.61.6 0.5 0.60.1 0.2 0.70.9 0.4 0.40.6 0.5 0.3 0.30.9 0.4 0.60.8 0.4 0.60.9 0.4 0.50.9 0.4 0.50.1 0.2 0.60.7 0.4 0.51.4 1.0 0.5 0.40.8 0.4 0.71.0 0.4 0.61.2 0.5 0.71.4 0.5 0.40.2 0.1 0.2 0.71.0 0.4 0.41.8 1.4 0.7 0.40.7 0.4 0.60.7 0.3 0.50.8 0.4 0.61.0 0.4 0.20.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.50.7 0.3 0.51.3 1.4 0.7 0.40.8 0.3 0.60.7 0.3 0.40.8 0.3 0.52.3 0.4 0.20.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.60.7 0.3 0.51.8 1.2 0.6 0.40.6 0.3 0.30.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.10.2 0.50.9 0.6 0.4 0.30.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.50.3 0.3 0.2 0.21.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.7 0.60.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.70.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.90.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.50.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.71.6 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.51.6 1.4 0.60.3 0.30.30.4 0.5 0.61.5 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.51.6 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.10.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.10.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.20.3 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.31.5 1.0 0.41.6 1.3 0.61.4 1.3 0.6LINCOLN & SUNKIST LIGHTING CONCEPTUAL PLAN Feb 07, 202202of 05LIGHTING PLAN PRIVATE STREETLINCOLN AVENUES SUNKIST STREETANy CHANGE OR DEVIATION FROM THE LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONSON PLAN SHALL INVALIDATE THIS PHOTOMETRIC ANALySISʒNOTE:0(IN FEET)20 1020 401 INCH = 20 FEETPRIVATE STREETPROPERTY LINEMAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: BL0121 BOLLARD ˫ 3ʒ5ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 11wATTAGE: 1ɾ ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 04MAKE: TERON LIGHTINGMODEL: CHAPARRAL BULLET LIGHT ˫ ɾʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 4wATTAGE: 5ʒ3SPEC: SHEET 05MAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: EX111 POST TOP ˫ 14ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 12wATTAGE: 30 ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 03
LINCOLN & SUNKIST LIGHTING CONCEPTUAL PLAN Feb 07, 202203of 05SPECIFICATION: SITE LIGHTMAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: EX111 POST TOP ˫ 14ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 12wATTAGE: 30 ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 03
LINCOLN & SUNKIST LIGHTING CONCEPTUAL PLAN Feb 07, 202204of 05SPECIFICATION: BOLLARD LIGHTMAKE: ANP LIGHTINGMODEL: BL0121 BOLLARD ˫ 3ʒ5ʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 11wATTAGE: 1ɾ ˫ 3000KSPEC: SHEET 04
LINCOLN & SUNKIST LIGHTING CONCEPTUAL PLAN Feb 07, 202205of 05SPECIFICATION: TRELLIS LIGHTMAKE: TERON LIGHTINGMODEL: CHAPARRAL BULLET LIGHT ˫ ɾʖ AʒFʒGʒXTy: 4wATTAGE: 5ʒ3SPEC: SHEET 05
Summary of the community meetings:
KB Home held a community meeting on Tuesday, October 18th from 6-8PM at Abraham Lincoln
Elementary School. The meeting was open house style with several display boards set up on easels.
Team members in attendance included representatives from KB Home, the architect, the civil engineer,
and myself. Drinks and pastries were available for attendees. Mailers were sent to all addresses within a
2,000 foot radius of the project site. About a dozen people (12-15) attended the meeting, the majority
of whom were from the neighborhoods north of Lincoln. Two people were from the residential
neighborhood just south of the project site and one person was from a neighborhood further south on
Sunkist. The comments we heard are summarized as follows:
•Parking – Nearly every community member shared a concern about the existing parking
situation on their neighborhood streets. Some people were satisfied that the project will satisfy
the code-required parking, but some people were not convinced that enough parking would be
provided and firmly believe that more people in the area will mean more cars parking on their
streets. Most people were bothered by the impact of the existing apartments and renters
overflowing into their streets for parking. We found that it was helpful to tell people that the
project will provide nearly a 1:1 ratio of bedrooms (240) to parking spaces (237). One person
was adamant that one parking space per bedroom will not be sufficient and firmly believes
there will be several people living in each bedroom.
•Just Looking – Second to parking, the majority of people were simply interested to see what
was going to be built. They have been living near a vacant site for a few years and many just
liked the idea of anything going in that would help make the site look better. People did not
object to the three-story townhomes, although some people felt that it was “a lot of
stairs”. We shared unit count, height, SF of homes, bed/bath/parking. Most people were happy
with the housing product, even though some would not personally live in that type of product.
All were complementary of the aesthetics of the design and we did not hear anyone voice a
direct concern about “how the community looked.”
•Price – Several people inquired about home prices. They also voiced that they felt the project
would increase/strengthen their property value. Those that asked about affordable housing
were pleased that there would not be affordable housing within the community. They were also
glad to hear the townhomes will be for sale and not rentals.
•Timing – Many wanted to know the timing of when development/construction will begin.
•Traffic – A few people shared concerns about traffic, mostly detailing how they deal/navigate
traffic today. Most were pleased that the right turn lane on eastbound Lincoln will be
lengthened. Many were pleased that the community will be right out only at the exits, which
helps the northbound traffic on Sunkist approaching Lincoln. One person voiced frustration with
traffic due to proximity to the 57 ramps, saying he’s tried to bring up his concerns with the city
before only to hit a dead end once he gets referred to public works.
•Amenities – A couple people asked about the amenities in the community and they seemed to
like the dog park area on the south. A couple people wanted to know if the site was gated.
•One person who owns a home that is immediately adjacent to the property inquired about the
wall height on the southern boundary.
•One person really enjoyed reviewing/studying the plans and asked questions as she went along
from a range of topics including those listed above but also road width, circulation, and fencing.
•One person mentioned recent issues with a homeless population congregating around the gas
station at the southeast corner of Lincoln and Sunkist. They seemed encouraged that the
project might help clear that up (as opposed to the current/vacant state of the site).
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
I attended the District 5 Community Meeting on October 19th at the Anaheim United Methodist Church.
Jason Perez with Neighborhood Services introduced me as the last item on the agenda and let attendees
know that I would be available for questions after the meeting. I spoke with eight people and their
comments were as follows:
• Four people expressed concern about the existing left turn on green arrow from westbound
Lincoln onto southbound Sunkist. They said it’s common to wait through a few light cycles to
make the turn during rush hour. They expect this left turn on green arrow to become more
impacted with the project. They asked if the left turn arrow will have a longer light cycle or if left
turns will be allowed on green, not just on green arrow.
• Most people asked about the on-site parking, but none expressed concern over the number of
parking spaces proposed. They seemed satisfied with each unit being provided a two-car garage,
plus additional surface parking.
• One person was concerned that left turns out of the project site would be allowed and they
were happy to hear that both driveways will be restricted to right turn in, right turn out.
• A few people were relieved to hear it is a for-sale project instead of an apartment project.
• One person asked about the setbacks along Lincoln and wanted to make sure landscaping would
be provided along Lincoln.
• One person asked about the open space provided on site and liked the idea of a community
garden.
• Two people asked if a traffic study was completed and they believe the site will have more
traffic than the former EDD buildings.
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
RM-4
BARKLEY APARTMENTS
161 DU
RM-4
THE CORSICAN
APARTMENTS
124 DU
RM-4
HAMPSHIRE SQUARE II
APARTMENTS
209 DU
C-G
CAR WASH
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
C-GDEV2021-001 80STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELO PMENT DEPARTMENT
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
C-G
SERVICE
STATION
S SUNKIST STE LINCOLN AVE
E PARAD ISE RD
S PEREGRINE STS COLT STE WA RD TER
E P OWHATA N AVE
E WESTPORT DR
E WESTPORT CIRS PARADISE LNE. LINCOLN AVE
E. SOUTH ST S. SUNKIST STS. RIO VISTA STE. LA PALMA AVE
E . B R O A D W A Y N. RIO VISTA ST57 FWY57 FWYPr o j e c t L o c a t i o n : 2 4 2 0 - 2 4 5 0 E a st L in c o ln Av e n u e
D E V N o . 2 0 2 1 -0 0 1 8 0
Subject Property
APN: 083-731-18
083-731-19
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph oto :
Ma y 2 02 1