71R-350
RESOLUTION NO. 71R-350
-............
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIl,l MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED
AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHM~GED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did hold a public hearing in Reclassification Proceed-
ings No. 70-71-59 to consider an amendment to
Title 18 ot-the Anaheirnf1un'rclpal Code relating to zoning, and
to consider a change in the boundaries of the zone or zones
hereinafter mentioned and described, and at said hearing did
receive evidence and reports from persons interested therein
and from its staff; and
WHEREAS, within a period of forty days following said
hearing the Planning Commission did duly adopt a resolution
containing a report of its findings, a summary of the evidence
presented at said hearing, and a recommendation that the pro-
posed amendment be adopted by the City Council and that a
certain zone or zones be changed as hereinafter set forth: and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said resolution, summary of
evidence, report of findings and recommendation of the City
Planning Commission the City Council did fix the 3rd day
of August , 19 71 as the time, and the City Council
Chambers in the-C"ity Halr 'of the City of Anaheim as the place
for a public hearing upon said proposed amendment to Title 18
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the exclusion of said
property, hereinafter described, from the zone or zones in
which it is now situated and the incorporation thereof in the
zone or zones hereinafter set forth, and did give notice there-
of in the manner and form as provided in said Title 18 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for' said public
hearing the City Council did hold and conduct such public
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an oppor-
tunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports, and
did thereupon consider the summary of evidence presented at
said public hearing before the Planning Co~ssion, its report
of findings and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Cou~cil does find and determine
that the amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim MuniCipal Code
should be adopted and that the property hereinafter described
should be excluded from the zone or zones in which it is now
situated and incorporated in the zone or zones as hereinafter
set forth.
NOW I THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Ci ty Council
of the City of Anaheim that Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code be, and the same is hereby, amended and that the following
described property, situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, to wit:
-1-
70-71-59
PARCEL 1 OF 2:
.----.,
Lots 1 to 13 inclusive of the ilAdobe Wall Vineyard",
as shown on a map filed in Case No. 1978 of the Seven-
teenth Judicial District Court in and for the County
of Los Angeles, and marked ther.eon as "Diagram C".
PARCEL 2 OF 2:
That portion of the land a10tted to prudencio Yorba
and to M. J. Y. De Scully according to a map attached
to and made a part of the Decre.e of Partition of the
Rancho Canon De Santa Ana, in the County of Orange,
State of California, rendered in Case No. 1978 of the
17th Judicial District Court of California, a certified
copy of which is recorded in Book 28 page 158 of Deeds,
in the Office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles
County, located in the County of Orange, State of
California.
,.-~.
Beginning at the most southeasterly corner of said allot-
ment, said point being Station 7 of said prudencio Yorba's
first class land; thence North 780 00' 00" West along the
southerly line of said allotment to Station 6; thence
North 20 45' 0011 East along the westerly line of said
allotment to Station 5~ thence East to Station 4, said
station being on the southwesterly line of the Adobe Wall
Vineyard in said Rancho~ thence South 240 451 00" East to
Station 3; thence North 690 45' 00" East along the south-
easterly line of said Adobe Wall Vineyard to Station 2;
being the most easterly corner of said Adobe Wall Vineyard:
thence East along the northerly line of said allotment to
Station "1; thence South along the easterly line of said
allotment to Station 9; thence South 860 IS' 00" West to
Station 8j thence South 50 00' 00" West along the easterly
line of said allotment to the northwest corner of the
land a110ted to Maria De Jesus Yorba De Scully in Decree
of Partition of the Rancho Canon De Santa Ana in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California rendered
in Case No. 1978 of the 17th Judicial District Court of
California, a certified copy of which was recorded February
8, 1874 in Book 28 page 158 of Deeds of Los Angeles County,
California, thence South 79051' 0011 East 235.60 feet';
thence South 50 00' 00" West 591.40 feet to a 2" x 4"
post from which an old 2" x 4" post mark.ing the northeast
corner of the Rancho Rivas Tract of third class land in
said Rancho bears South 790 00' 00" East 472.44 feet;
thence North 790 00' DO" liest 235.61 feet to the point
of beginning.
Except therefrom a strip of land 120 feet in width, the
southerly line being described as the northerly line of
the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad right of way
as described in a deed recorded July 6, 1908 in Book 158
page 355 of Deeds.
Also except therefrom all the land included within the
Yorba Annexation No. 116 per Ordinance No. 1777 recorded
in Orange County August 13, 1964.
-2-
Also except that portion thereof described as follows:
,,...-..
Beginning at said Station Ii thence North 890 10' 15"
West 19.26 feet along the north line of said land, thence
South 250 22' 16" East 43.61 feet to the East line of said
land; thence North 00 49' 4511 East 39.13 feet to the point
of beginning.
Also exceot any portion thereof lying within the Santa
Fe Railroad as described in a deed recorded July 6, 1908
in Book 158 page 355 of Deeds of Orange County.
be excluded from the County of Orange A-I, GENERAL AGRICULTURAL
DISTRICT and incorporated in the City of Anaheim R-A, AGRICULTURAL
ZONE subject to the following condition:
1. That these reclassification proceedings are granted
subject to the completion of annexation of subject
property to the City of Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney be, and
he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit to
the City Council an ordinance amending Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to accomplish the objects herein found and
determined to be necessary and proper.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 3rd day of August, 1971.
ATTEST
. ..........
........
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
.~
I, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso~ution No. 71R-350 was
passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the 3rd day of August , 1971 , by the following
vote of the members thereof: ---
AYES:
COUNCILMEN: Roth, Pebley and stephenson
NOES:
COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Thom and Dutton
Pro-Tem
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor/of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 3rd day of
August , 19...lL.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 3rd day of
August ___, 19 71 .
Lfi.LJ~ .
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 7lR-350 duly
passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on August 3, 1971.
L ),r.LJ~
City Clerk
---.....