Loading...
RES-2023-079RESOLUTION NO.2023-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS -GENERAL USE CONSISTING OF A TRANSITIONAL KINDERGARTEN THROUGH 8TH GRADE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO.2021-00218) (2780 EAST WAGNER AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for a conditional use permit to establish an Educational Institutions -General use for a public charter school with up to 480 students between Transitional Kindergarten (TK) to 8th Grade, including the remodel of existing buildings for classroom and school administration use, the construction of a new 5,633 square foot two-story classroom building, and various ancillary site modifications and landscaping improvements (the "Proposed Project"), on certain real property located at 2780 East Wagner Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Educational Institutions -General uses are subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection .010 of Section 18.14.030 (Uses) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.93 acres in area and is currently developed with a church and day care facility. The Property is designated for Low Density Residential Uses in the General Plan. The Property is located in the "T" Transitional Zone and is subject to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special -Purpose Zones) and Subsection .040 of Section 18.40.040 (Uses Adjacent to Residential Zones or Residential Uses) of the Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as "CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 17, 2023, at 5:00 p.m., with notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to permit the Proposed Project on the Property, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2023-021 finding and determining that the Proposed Project was categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities); Section 15302, Class 2 (Replacement or Reconstruction); and Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and approving Development Application No. 2021-00218 subject to certain conditions of approval described in said Resolution; and WHEREAS, on July 25, 2023, and within the time prescribed by Section 18.60.10 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, an appeal of the Planning Commission's action was filed by Cecilia Flores (the "Appellant"); and WHEREAS, in the appeal, Appellant claimed the Proposed Project will increase air pollution, traffic congestion, and noise levels in the neighborhood. The Appellant also claimed that the Proposed Project will impact the available parking and create congestion for users of the Rio Vista Trail; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2023-021 approving Development Permit No. 2021-00218, a summary of evidence and a report of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, and the appeal, the City Council did set the matter for a de novo hearing, which public hearing was noticed in the matter provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 12, 2023, at 5:30 p.m. and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the recommendations and action of the Planning Commission pursuant to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit, finds that not all of the criteria set forth in Section 18.66.060 (Findings) of Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Code can be made; and does find and determine the following: 1. That the findings necessary to support the granting of a conditional use permit cannot be made because the size and shape of the Property are inadequate to support the proposed 480-student school in a manner that would not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood. The Property is inadequate in size to provide adequate queuing and on -site vehicular circulation to accommodate pick-up and drop-off in a manner that does not affect the adjoining streets and adjoining residential properties; the vehicular queuing is located too close to the adjacent residential property lines; the Property lacks adequate emergency vehicular circulation during pick-up and drop-off times; and, proposed conditions are infeasible and do not adequately address potential negative effects from the Proposed Project, including noise, as proposed. Because of -2- these concerns, the Proposed Project as proposed will be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, this City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report, and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this Resolution. This City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, this City Council does hereby deny Development Application No. 2021-00218. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which a rehearing must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City Council Resolution No. 79R-524. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 12th day of September 2023, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Rubalcava, Leon, Kurtz and Meeks NOES: Council Member Diaz ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Council Member Faessel (recusal) ATTEST: F CIT CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITY OF ANAHEIM -3- EXHIBIT „Are DEV NO.2021-00218 APN; 253414-12 & 253451-06 LL-Li I E UZBETH AVE Q Fc E WAGNER AVE a,= e--] 173, E MAVERICK AVE q E NORMC PL �� v Source: Recorded Tract Maps atiftr City GIS. Please note the accuracy 8s +J- two to five feet. CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Resolution No. 2023-079 adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 12�1 day of September. 2023 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Rubalcava, Leon, Kurtz, Meeks NOES: Council Member Diaz ABSTAIN: Council Member Faessel (recusal) ABSENT: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 271 day of September. 2023. L4CITYLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL)