Attachment 3a - ISND AppendicesATTACHMENT NO. 3a
Appendix
Air Quality Modeling
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
3.3. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
1 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
2/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
5.2. Off -Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
5.5. Architectural Coatings
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
3/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
5.7. Construction Paving
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
4/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
5/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
6/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Project Name
Construction Start Date
Operational Year
Lead Agency
Land Use Scale
Analysis Level for Defaults
Windspeed (m/s)
Precipitation (days)
Location
County
City
Air District
Air Basin
TAZ
EDFZ
Electric Utility
Gas Utility
App Version
1.2. Land Use Types
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard
11 /1 /2023
2024
Project/site
County
1.80
21.2
1477 N Jefferson St, Anaheim, CA 92807, USA
Orange
Anaheim
South Coast AQMD
South Coast
5701
7
City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department
Southern California Gas
2022.1.1.14
7/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Parking Lot 7.75 Acre 7.75 0.00 10,000
1.3. User -Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
Unmit. 1.09 4.89 7.96 10.9 0.01 0.39 0.23 0.62 0.36 0.05 0.41 -
Average - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daily
(Max)
Unmit. 0.06 0.26 0.44 0.61 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 0.02 -
Annual - - - - - - - - - - - -
(Max)
Unmit. 0.01 0.05 0.08 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 -
2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
Daily - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
1,783 1,783 0.07 0.03 0.03 1,793
99.4
99.4
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.03
100
16.5
16.5
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
16.6
8/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
2024
1.09
4.89
7.96
10.9
0.01
0.39
0.23
0.62
0.36
0.05
0.41 -
1,783
1,783
0.07
0.03
0.03
1,793
2025
0.22
4.88
1.01
1.95
< 0.005
0.03
0.23
0.25
0.03
0.05
0.08 -
399
399
0.01
0.02
0.03
405
Average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Daily
2024
0.06
0.12
0.44
0.61
< 0.005
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.02
< 0.005
0.02 -
99.4
99.4
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.03
100
2025
0.01
0.26
0.05
0.10
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.01
0.01
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
21.3
21.3
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.02
21.6
Annual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
-
2024
0.01
0.02
0.08
0.11
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.01
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
16.5
16.5
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
16.6
2025
< 0.005
0.05
0.01
0.02
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
3.52
3.52
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
3.57
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Unmit.
0.77
0.21
9.20
4.23
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.86
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,667
7,667
0.67
1.11
14.2
8,030
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Winter
(Max)
Unmit.
0.76
0.20
9.55
4.27
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,670
7,670
0.67
1.11
0.37
8,020
Average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Daily
(Max)
Unmit.
0.77
0.21
9.63
4.25
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,668
7,668
0.67
1.11
6.15
8,023
Annual
(Max)
Unmit.
0.14
0.04
1.76
0.78
0.01
0.02
0.32
0.34
0.02
0.09
0.10
0.00
1,270
1,270
0.11
0.18
1.02
1,328
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
9/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and GHGs (lb/dav for dailv. MT/vr for annual
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Summer
(Max)
Mobile
0.77
0.16
9.20
4.23
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.86
0.10
0.48
0.57
-
6,906
6,906
0.60
1.10
14.2
7,264
Area
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
Energy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
-
759
759
0.07
0.01
-
764
Water
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
1.78
Waste
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
Total
0.77
0.21
9.20
4.23
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.86
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,667
7,667
0.67
1.11
14.2
8,030
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Winter
(Max)
Mobile
0.76
0.15
9.55
4.27
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
-
6,909
6,909
0.60
1.11
0.37
7,254
Area
-
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Energy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
-
759
759
0.07
0.01
-
764
Water
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
1.78
Waste
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
Total
0.76
0.20
9.55
4.27
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,670
7,670
0.67
1.11
0.37
8,020
Average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Daily
Mobile
0.77
0.15
9.63
4.25
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
-
6,907
6,907
0.60
1.10
6.15
7,258
Area
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
Energy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
-
759
759
0.07
0.01
-
764
Water
-
-
-
-
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
1.78
Waste
-
-
-
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
Total
0.77
0.21
9.63
4.25
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57
0.00
7,668
7,668
0.67
1.11
6.15
8,023
Annual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Mobile
0.14
0.03
1.76
0.78
0.01
0.02
0.32 0.34
0.02
0.09 0.10
- 1,144
1,144
0.10
0.18 1.02
1,202
Area
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
- 0.00
0.00
- 0.00
- 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
Energy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
- 0.00
0.00
- 0.00
- 126
126
0.01
< 0.005 -
126
Water
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
0.00 0.29
0.29
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
0.29
Waste
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
Total
0.14
0.04
1.76
0.78
0.01
0.02
0.32 0.34
0.02
0.09 0.10
0.00 1,270
1,270
0.11
0.18 1.02
1,328
3. Construction Emissions Details
3.1. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Onsite
Daily, -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
Daily, -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
Off -Road 0.17
0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 - 0.03 0.03 - 0.03 - 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 - 134
Equipment
Architect -
4.70 - - - -
ural
Coatings
Onsite 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
truck
Average -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daily
Off -Road < 0.005
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 < 0.005 - < 0.005 - 0.52 0.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 - 0.52
Equipment
11 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Architect
-
0.02
-
-
-
-
- -
ural
Onsite
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
truck
Annual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Off -Road
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
< 0.005 -
Equipment
Architect
-
< 0.005
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
ural
Coatings
Onsite
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
truck
Offsite
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Winter
(Max)
Worker
0.07
0.06
0.07
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.05
0.05 -
Vendor
0.01
< 0.005
0.07
0.04
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.02
0.02
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.01 -
Hauling
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
Average
-
-
-
-
-
-
Daily
Worker
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.00
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Vendor
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Hauling
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
Annual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Worker
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.00
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Vendor
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Hauling
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
12/37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.09
0.09
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
0.09
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
206
206
< 0.005
0.01
0.02
209
64.8
64.8
< 0.005
0.01
< 0.005
67.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.82
0.82
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.83
0.25
0.25
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.14
0.04
0.04
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
3.3. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) �I
Onsite
Daily, -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Summer
(Max)
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off -Road 0.15
0.13
0.88
1.14
< 0.005
0.03 -
0.03
0.03 -
0.03 -
134
134
0.01
< 0.005 -
134
Equipment
Architect -
4.70
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
ural
Coatings
Onsite 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
truck
Average -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Daily
Off -Road 0.01
0.01
0.05
0.06
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
< 0.005 -
7.06
7.06
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
7.08
Equipment
Architect -
0.25
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
ural
Coatings
Onsite 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
truck
Annual -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Off -Road < 0.005
< 0.005
0.01
0.01
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
< 0.005 -
1.17
1.17
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
1.17
Equipment
Architect -
0.05
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
ural
Coatings
13/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -
truck
Offsite
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.05 -
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 -
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -
Average - - - - - -
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 -
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 -
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -
Annual - - - - - - - - - - - -
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 -
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 -
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -
3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Onsite - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
202
202
< 0.005
0.01
0.02
204
63.8
63.8
< 0.005
0.01
< 0.005
66.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.8
10.8
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.02
11.0
3.37
3.37
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
3.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.79
1.79
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
1.82
0.56
0.56
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.58
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Daily, -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Winter
(Max)
Off -Road 1.01
0.85
7.81
10.0
0.01
0.39
-
0.39
0.36
-
0.36 -
Equipment
Paving -
1.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Onsite 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
truck
Average -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Daily
Off -Road 0.06
0.05
0.43
0.55
< 0.005
0.02
-
0.02
0.02
-
0.02 -
Equipment
Paving -
0.06
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Onsite 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
truck
Annual -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Off -Road 0.01
0.01
0.08
0.10
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
< 0.005
< 0.005
-
< 0.005 -
Equipment
Paving -
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Onsite 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
truck
Offsite -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Daily, -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Summer
(Max)
Daily, -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.07
0.06
0.07
0.83
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.00
0.05
0.05 -
Vendor 0.01
< 0.005
0.07
0.04
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.02
0.02
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.01 -
Hauling 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
Average -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Daily
15/37
1,512
1,512
0.06
0.01 -
1,517
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
82.8
82.8
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
83.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
13.7
13.7
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
13.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
206
206
< 0.005
0.01
0.02
209
64.8
64.8
< 0.005
0.01
< 0.005
67.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
Annual - - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.00
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/dav for dailv. ton/vr for annual) and
GHGs (lb/dav
for
dailv. MT/vr for
annual)
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Parking
0.77
0.16
9.20
4.23
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.86
0.10
0.48
0.57 -
Lot
Total
0.77
0.16
9.20
4.23
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.86
0.10
0.48
0.57 -
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
Winter
(Max)
Parking
0.76
0.15
9.55
4.27
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57 -
Lot
Total
0.76
0.15
9.55
4.27
0.06
0.10
1.76
1.87
0.10
0.48
0.57 -
Annual
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
11.5
11.5
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.02
11.6
3.55
3.55
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
3.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.90
1.90
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
1.92
0.59
0.59
< 0.005
< 0.005
< 0.005
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,906
6,906
0.60
1.10
14.2
7,264
6,906
6,906
0.60
1.10
14.2
7,264
6,909
6,909
0.60
1.11
0.37
7,254
6,909
6,909
0.60
1.11
0.37
7,254
16/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Parking 0.14 0.03 1.76 0.78 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.34 0.02 0.09 0.10 -
Lot
Total 0.14 0.03 1.76 0.78 0.01 0.02 0.32 0.34 0.02 0.09 0.10 -
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
Parking - - - - - - - - - - -
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
Parking - - - - - - - -
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
Annual
Parking - - - - - - - - - - -
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
1,144
1,144
0.10
0.18
1.02
1,202
1,144
1,144
0.10
0.18
1.02
1,202
- 759
759
0.07
0.01 -
764
- 759
759
0.07
0.01 -
764
- 759
759
0.07
0.01 -
764
- 759
759
0.07
0.01 -
764
- 126
126
0.01
< 0.005 -
126
- 126
126
0.01
< 0.005 -
126
17/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
Lot
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
Dail - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
y.
Winter
(Max)
Parking
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
Lot
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
Annual
Parking
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
Lot
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - -
Summer
(Max)
Consum - 0.03 - - - - - - - - -
er
Products
Architect - 0.03 - - - - - - - - -
ural
Coatings
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
18/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Landsca
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
pe
Equipme
Total
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
Daily,
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Winter
(Max)
Consum
-
0.03
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
er
Products
Architect
-
0.03
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
ural
Coatings
Total
-
0.05
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Annual-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
Consum
-
< 0.005
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
er
Products
Architect
-
< 0.005
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
ural
Coatings
Landsca
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
pe
Equipme
nt
Total
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
0.00 -
0.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 -
0.00
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
19/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
- -
-
Summer
(Max)
Parking - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
1.78
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
1.78
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
Winter
(Max)
Parking - - - - - - -
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
1.78
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00
1.77
1.77
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
1.78
Annual
Parking - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00
0.29
0.29
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
0.29
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00
0.29
0.29
< 0.005
< 0.005 -
0.29
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Parking - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
Lot
Total - - - - - - - - - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
Daily, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Winter
(Max)
20/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Parking — — — — — —
Lot
Total — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual
Parking — — — — — — — — — — —
Lot
Total — — — — — — — — — — —
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
TotI
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 —
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 —
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 —
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 —
0.00
a— — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — —
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
21 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Daily, — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — —
Daily, — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — —
Total — — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Daily, — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — —
Annual — — — — —
Total — — — — —
22/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Total— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
23 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual)
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — —
ered
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — —
24/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ered
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
d
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ered
Subtotal
Remove
d
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5. Activity Data
5.1. Construction Schedule
25 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/30/2024 1/27/2025 5.00 20.0 -
Paving Paving 12/1 /2024 12/29/2024 5.00 20.0 -
5.2. Off -Road Equipment
5.2.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower E.
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36
Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
5.3. Construction Vehicles
5.3.1. Unmitigated
Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
Worker
16.0
18.5
LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating
Vendor
2.00
10.2
HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating
Hauling
0.00
20.0
HHDT
Architectural Coating
Onsite truck
-
-
HHDT
Paving
-
-
-
-
Paving
Worker
16.0
18.5
LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving
Vendor
2.00
10.2
HHDT,MHDT
Paving
Hauling
0.00
20.0
HHDT
Paving
Onsite truck
-
-
HHDT
26 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.4. Vehicles
5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.5. Architectural Coatings
Architectural Coating 0.00
5.6. Dust Mitigation
5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
M
Paving 0.00 0.00
5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non -applicable. No control strategies activated by user.
5.7. Construction Paving
Parking Lot 7.75
5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors
kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
0.00 0.00 20,255
0.00 0.00 7.75
100%
2024 0.00 1,040 0.09 0.01
2025 0.00 1,040 0.09 0.01
27 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Parking Lot 150 150
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
I
54,750 1,922 1,922 1,922 701,384
0 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,255
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N20 and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Parking Lot 295,729 937 0.0856 0.0123 0.00
28 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Parking Lot 0.00 129,604
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Parking Lot 0.00 —
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off -Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
29 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type -1
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
30 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal -Adapt midcentury 2040-2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG
emissions will continue to rise strongly throuqh 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Temperature and Extreme Heat 13.1 annual days of extreme heat
Extreme Precipitation 4.30 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm
Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed
historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal -Adapt, 2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about'/4 an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full
day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different
increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal -Adapt (2040-2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate,
vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make
different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature
possibilities (MIR005). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Temperature and Extreme Heat
0
0
0
N/A
Extreme Precipitation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sea Level Rise
0
0
0
N/A
Wildfire
0
0
0
N/A
Flooding
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Drought
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Snowpack Reduction
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Air Quality Degradation
0
0
0
N/A
31 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Temperature and Extreme Heat
1
1
1
2
Extreme Precipitation
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Sea Level Rise
1
1
1
2
Wildfire
1
1
1
2
Flooding
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Drought
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Snowpack Reduction
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Air Quality Degradation
1
1
1
2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest
exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the
greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Exposure Indicators
AQ-Ozone
53.7
32 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
AQ-PM
AQ-DPM
Drinking Water
Lead Risk Housing
Pesticides
Toxic Releases
Traffic
Effect Indicators
CleanUp Sites
Groundwater
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators
Impaired Water Bodies
Solid Waste
Sensitive Population
Asthma
Cardio-vascular
Low Birth Weights
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators
Education
Housing
Linguistic
Poverty
Unemployment
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A
87.9
85.9
56.2
10.6
0.00
100.0
91.5
99.9
82.6
99.9
0.00
95.0
63.3
43.7
95.2
76.3
6.27
38.1
19.6
score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions co
to other census tracts in the state.
33/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Economic —
Above Poverty —
Employed —
Median HI —
Education —
Bachelor's or higher —
High school enrollment —
Preschool enrollment —
Transportation —
Auto Access —
Active commuting —
Social —
2-parent households —
Voting —
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability —
Park access —
Retail density —
Supermarket access —
Tree canopy —
Housing —
Homeownership —
Housing habitability —
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden —
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden —
Uncrowded housing —
Health Outcomes —
34/37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Insured adults
Arthritis
98.8
Asthma ER Admissions
68.7
High Blood Pressure
98.7
Cancer (excluding skin)
98.2
Asthma
80.2
Coronary Heart Disease
98.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
97.7
Diagnosed Diabetes
96.7
Life Expectancy at Birth
0.0
Cognitively Disabled
99.4
Physically Disabled
97.6
Heart Attack ER Admissions
71.1
Mental Health Not Good
57.3
Chronic Kidney Disease
95.6
Obesity
65.8
Pedestrian Injuries
0.0
Physical Health Not Good
85.2
Stroke
98.4
Health Risk Behaviors
—
Binge Drinking
1.2
Current Smoker
59.6
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity
65.6
Climate Change Exposures
—
Wildfire Risk
0.0
SLR Inundation Area
0.0
Children
14.1
35 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
Elderly
94.7
English Speaking
0.0
Foreign -born
0.0
Outdoor Workers
57.2
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity
—
Impervious Surface Cover
9.6
Traffic Density
0.0
Traffic Access
54.9
Other Indices
—
Hardship
0.0
Other Decision Support
—
2016 Voting
0.0
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 79.0
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) —
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes
Project Located in a Low -Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No
Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
36 / 37
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Detailed Report, 6/20/2023
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Construction: Construction Phases
Construction: Trips and VMT
Operations: Vehicle Data
Operations: Fleet Mix
Only striping and minor paving.
Based on applicant provided information.
Based on VMT memo for project. Net trips.
100% heavy-duty trucks assumed.
37 / 37
Appendix B
VMT Screening Analysis
VMT SCREENING MEMORANDUM
To: Mr. Brian Wong Date: March 21, 2023 ,
NP Jefferson, LLC
Engineers &Planners
From: Keil D. Maberry, P.E., Principal LLG Ref: 2.21.4381.1 Traffic
Zawwar Saiyed, P.E., Associate Principal Transportation
Linscott, Law and Greenspan, Engineers Parking
Subject: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis for the Proposed
Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim
As requested, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Assessment Technical Memorandum for
the proposed Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard project (herein after referred to as
"Project") in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. This Screening
Memorandum presents the VMT screening criteria, analysis methodology and the
conclusion. It should be noted that the approach and methodology outlined in this
Technical Memorandum is consistent with the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact
Analysis Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020),
which provides additional detail on the language and analysis procedures described
in this VMT Screening Memorandum.
The following sections of this VMT Screening Memorandum summarize the Project
description, present City of Anaheim's VMT screening criteria, analysis
methodology and conclusion.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Project site consists of an abandoned 7.75-acre terminal fuel storage
facility at 1477 N. Jefferson Street on the west side of Jefferson Street between
Orangethorpe Avenue and Miraloma Avenue. Figure 1 presents a Vicinity Map that
illustrates the general location of the Project site and surrounding street system.
Figure 2 presents the historical/entitled site aerial, which shows the historical truck
trailer storage capacity configuration, entitled truck fueling facility, and entitled
office building along Jefferson Street. Specifically, there were 95 truck trailer spaces
in the northwest portion of the site, three (3) truck fueling positions in the central
portion, and 2,670 square -foot (SF) office building in the southeast portion.
The proposed Project will consist of a trailer storage yard with up to 200 trailer
parking/storage spaces as well as up to 29 vehicular parking spaces. Access for the
Project site will be provided via two (2) gated access driveways along Jefferson
Street with a minimum of 80 feet of throating between the back of sidewalk and each
gate. Figure 3 presents the proposed site plan for the Project, prepared by Herdman
Architecture + Design.
Linscott, Law &
Greenspan, Engineers
2 Executive Circle
Suite 250
Irvine, CA 92614
949.825.6175 T
949.825.5939 F
www.Ilgengineers.com
Pasadena
Irvine
San Diego
Philip M. Linscott, PE(ts2a-2000)
William A. Law, PE (1921-2018)
Jack M. Greenspan, PE (Rat)
Paul W. Wilkinson, PE (Rat.)
John P. Keating, PE (Rat)
David S. Shender, PE
John A. Boarman, PE
Clare M. Look -Jaeger, PE (Rat.)
Richard E. Barretto, PE
Keil D. Mabeny, PE
Kalyan C. Yellapu, PE
Dave Roseman, PE
Shankar Ramakrishnan, PE
An LG2WB Company Founded 1966
Mr. Brian Wong
March 21, 2023
Page 2
PROJECT SCREENING CRITERIA
Under the VMT methodology, screening is used to determine if a project will be
required to conduct a detailed VMT analysis. The following section discusses the
various screening methods outlined in the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis
Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) for land
use projects and outlines whether the Project will screen -out, either in its entirety, or
partially based on individual land uses.
Type 1: Transit Priori . Area (TPA) Screening
The City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California
Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) states:
"Projects located within a TPA' may be presumed to have a less than
significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. This
presumption may NOT be appropriate if the project:
1. Has a total Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;
2. Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the
project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the
project to supply parking);
3. Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as
determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning
Organization); or
4. Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate -
or high -income residential units. "
Based on Figure 4 (Attachment A of Guidelines), which presents the Transit Priority
Areas (TPAs) in Anaheim, the proposed Project will not screen -out since it is not
located within a TPA.
Type 2: Low VMT Area Screening
The City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California
Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) states:
' A TPA is defined as a half mile area around an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high -quality
transit corridor per the definitions below.
■ Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 - `Major transit stop' means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry
terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes
with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.
• Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 - For purposes of this section, a `high -quality transit corridor' means a corridor with
fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.
N:\4300\2214381 - Jefferson Street Logistics Yard, Anaheim\VMT\2214381 - Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim - VMT Memo (03-21-23).docx
Mr. Brian Wong
March 21, 2023
Page 3
"Residential and office projects located within a low VMT-generating area
may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary. "
Based on Figure 5 (Attachment B of Guidelines), which presents a map of low VMT-
generating zones in Anaheim as compared to the County2I the proposed Project will
not screen -out since it is not located in a low VMT-generating area.
Type 3: Project Type Screening
The City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for California
Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) provides additional
recommendations on when the presumption of less than significant impacts may be
appropriate, in addition to the formally recommended screening criteria described
above. It states:
"Some project types are presumed to have a less than significant
transportation impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary as their uses
are local serving in nature. Local serving retail generally improves the
convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle
travel. The following uses can be screened from project -level assessment as
they are presumed to have a less than significant impact due to their local
serving nature:
■ Local -serving K-12 schools
■ Pocket, neighborhood and community parks as defined by the General
Plan
■ Day care centers
■ Local -serving retail uses less than 50, 000 square feet3, 4 including:
o Alcoholic Beverage Sales (Off -Sale and On -Sale)
o Animal -Grooming and Animal -Boarding
o Automotive Washing
o Automotive -Parts Sales
o Automotive -Repair and Modification (Major and Minor)
o Automotive -Service Stations
o Business & Financial Services
o Commercial Retail Centers (Large and Small)
z Attachment B was created with outputs from the Base Year (2016) OCTAM Version 5 in May of 2020. As OCTA updates
OCTAM versions, this attachment should be periodically updated to represent the latest information.
s The City of Anaheim may require a full VMT assessment if discretionary action is required.
° Typically uses consistent with Anaheim Municipal Code 18.36.040 Non -Residential Primary Use Classes. Uses may be excluded
and/or other uses may be included as determined by the Planning and Building Director.
N:\4300\2214381 - Jefferson Street Logistics Yard, Anaheim\VMT\2214381 - Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim - VMT Memo (03-21-23).docx
Mr. Brian Wong
March 21, 2023
Page 4
o Computer Internet & Amusement Facilities
o Convenience Stores
o Dance & Fitness Studios (Large and Small)
o Drive -Through Facilities
o Equipment Rental (Large and Small)
o Group Care Facilities
o Gym
o Markets (Large and Small)
o Personal Services -General
o Plant Nurseries
o Restaurants (Full Service, General and Outdoor dining)
o Retail Sales (General, Kiosks, Outdoor and Used
Merchandise)
o Self -Storage
o Wine Bar
■ Student housing projects on or adjacent to college campuses
■ Community and Religious Assembly Uses
■ Public Services
■ Local -serving community colleges that are consistent with the
assumptions noted in the RTPISCS
■ Affordable or supportive housing
■ Convalescent & Rest Homes
■ Senior housing (as defined by HUD)
■ Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips5
Table 1, attached, summarizes the trip generation rates used in forecasting the peak
hour and daily vehicular trips generated by the historical/entitled uses on the site as
well as the proposed Project. As shown in the middle portion of Table 1, the
proposed Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard Project is forecast to generate 227
daily vehicle trips, with 15 vehicle trips (7 inbound, 8 outbound) produced in the AM
peak hour and 12 vehicle trips (6 inbound, 6 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour
5 This threshold ties directly to the OPR technical advisory and notes that CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing
facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public
infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive
area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).) Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with
building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract
an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to
conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact.
N:\4300\2214381 - Jefferson Street Logistics Yard, Anaheim\VMT\2214381 - Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim - VMT Memo (03-21-23).docx
Mr. Brian Wong
March 21, 2023
Page 5
on a "typical" weekday. Furthermore as shown in Table I below the proposed
Project, the historical/entitled uses were forecast to generate 152 daily vehicle trips,
with 12 vehicle trips (7 inbound, 5 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 13
vehicle trips (5 inbound, 8 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a "typical"
weekday.
Lastly, review of the bottom portion of Table I indicates that the proposed Jefferson
Street Trailer Storage Yard Project is forecast to generate +75 net daily vehicle trips,
with +3 net vehicle trips (0 inbound, 3 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and
-1 net vehicle trips (1 inbound, -2 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a
"typical" weekday.
Using the criteria above, the City presumes that projects that are local serving in
nature tend to shorten trips and reduce VMT to create a less than significant
transportation impact. Similarly, the proposed Project's major trip purposes consist of
commute trips and local -serving truck trips and a logical way to evaluate this type of
facility is to consider the major trip purpose of the site in terms of their trip length and
frequency. Given the Project description, two types of trips were broadly considered
for this development given its context: (1) employee commute trips and (2) local -
serving truck trips. The commute trips will include a limited amount of staffing
necessary to maintain the Project site since the Project does not propose any habitable
structures nor does the Project propose any services or sales. As such, automobile
commute trips to this facility are expected to be nominal. It is anticipated that the
commute trips would most likely occur regardless of whether this location was
developed as it is in response to a likely existing demand for storage of excess truck
trailers.
Further, the local -serving truck trips would exist as a result of the proposed Project
use to store excess truck trailers for nearby warehouses or fulfillment centers that
need extra storage capacity during high -demand seasons. Although the end user of
this facility is unknown at this time, it is reasonable to assume that the ultimate end
user will select this site, at least in part, as to how it affects their transportation costs,
which will likely result in a sensitivity transportation cost analysis and their relative
proximity to customers and suppliers. Accordingly, it is reasonable to assume that
trailer drop lots are often located in a manner to reduce VMT and as a result, these
trips are assumed to be local -serving truck trips.
Based on the above and discussions with City staff, the proposed Project will screen -
out since the proposed Project is forecast to generate less than I10 net daily trips and
since it operates as a local -serving use that would not generate new demand but will
meet existing demand that would shorten the distance that road users would
N:\4300\2214381 - Jefferson Street Logistics Yard, Anaheim\VMT\2214381 - Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim - VMT Memo (03-21-23).docx
Mr. Brian Wong
March 21, 2023
Page 6
otherwise travel. It should be further noted that while not explicitly indicated in the
City Guidelines, OPR Technical Advisory indicates consistent with CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.3, subdivision (a), "For the purpose of this section, `vehicle miles
traveled' refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a
project", where "automobile" refers to on -road passenger vehicles, specifically cars
and light trucks. Therefore, given that the proposed Project will consist almost
entirely of heavy trucks, except for minimal employee trips, this Project's VMT is
negligible.
CONCLUSION
Consistent with the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for
California Environmental Quality Act Analysis (June 2020) and based on the VMT
screening methodology and findings outlined in this Screening Memorandum, the
proposed Project is forecast to generate less than 110 net daily trips, is assumed to be
a local serving use given the tripmaking characteristics of this truck trailer storage
facility, which will include nominal employee trips and local -serving truck trips
associated with a local end user, and consists primarily of heavy truck traffic, which
does not technically apply to VMT analyses based on CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.3, subdivision (a). Therefore, in accordance with the City of Anaheim's
guidelines and OPR guidance, the proposed Project is exempt from the preparation of
any further VMT analysis and may be presumed to have a less than significant CEQA
related transportation impact.
* * * * * * * * * * *
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this Technical Memorandum. Should you
have any questions regarding the memorandum, please contact us at (949) 825-6175.
Attachments
cc: File
R� S
� rR
N TR. 2525 a
,�E.P6/30/23 J
N:\4300\2214381 - Jefferson Street Logistics Yard, Anaheim\VMT\2214381 - Jefferson Street Trailer Storage Yard, Anaheim - VMT Memo (03-21-23).docx
Jiuiieu .-�L;iiuui uiauiLi •
ro
Apartment Hurries
q
delCurio
plvd Merrick Apartinonts 9
4 Uribn Place Apartments
De
D
21
EI Caminin Real 1
Meals
High Schocl
U aitd States
Ash si
Postal Service o
E OrangethiDrpe Ave o
All Ford. Auto Salvage
„ o
Atwood
;:
< F] ive gf N
n el
r Waste manayeme,nt -
Parque, d-e Los Ninon
�oCal Curbside Service
o
a
v�
Vinceile dive
Corporation -Placentia
g
J
RWC Buildirg Q La Pal❑maAae
Products - Placentia 7 a
Lnwry's 9 Sierra Madre
a
Business Park �
.,ie:ra M:;dre Cir a:
v
E
Manhelm
California
o
Hoorn Collision Repair
Hardy Window's
i
ape
SiieOne
& Auto Painting
Yo r
9ti
La d's
Supply
Mlral9m 3.Arr
Mur-80ma AYi
y
THE MOTOiLE
CV5
GUYSSALVAGE
o
European Auto Scurce
N
v
9 ECOna ite
Scott English
PleawednnCt m
w
CableCem Plum ing Inc
Pacific 5unwear9
1
2 CabIretry Inc
Tustin Avenue
Lease All La Palma � a
Business Park
Business Park
0
0
s
M
J
C
J
SOURCE: GOOGLE
LINSCOTT KEY FIGURE 1
(tNO
r— � = PROJECT SITE
GREENSPA SCALE
VICINITY MAP
JEFFERSON STREET TRAILER STORAGE YARD, ANAHEIM
SOURCE: GOOGLE
LINSCOTT I�NO
FIGURE 2
GREENSPAN SCALE
HISTORICAL/ENTITLED SITE AERIAL
JEFFERSON STREET TRAILER STORAGE YARD, ANAHEIM
-- �_. ' - - - -'- CONTROL CHANNEL
N NO SCALE
SOURCE: HERDMAN ARCHITECTURE
no. moros[omnc[x
xiaxixc srusn iei *oru
xnv nwx�rt
1..
�_...
axomxsiwc ww
z.�
w
xEw �xrex
�
y
�
z
LL
g
LL
FIGURE 3
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
JEFFERSON STREET LOGISTICS YARD, ANAHEIM
M
w
ri I Hw
z
d
o
3
�
d
W Orangethorpe Av 1
1.
......................
�..
La Palma Av
o
W m
m Lo
.1 °
Katella AV
-2
tmanAv
L Anaheim
Metrolink Stations
HQT Bus Stops Buffer(0.5 mile)
�kNO SCALE
SITE
sPj"� Rom'• �
3.
P a`a� ou"
,aria .
w•w•�
...'~�.
U
y �
2
Villa Parka
m
0
East Chapman AV 3
z
L
� a
p o
, E
17th5t �
SOURCE: OCTA
n
R
FIGURE 4
® TRANSIT PRIORITY AREAS (TPAs) IN ANAHEIM
JEFFERSON STREET LOGISTICS YARD, ANAHEIM
J. AL
} 1 /A
PROJECT SITE
.J ■Ike
t
i i L
�+ • Q
Ilk A ;
-wl
L�..�..�.. 1 _.p,
R
0
1. ! Anaheim City No Service Population 0 to -15% below the Orange County Average
<-15% below the Orange County Average = Higher than the Orange County Average
H vtnc
Rnnrh O
SOURCE: OCTA
LINSCOTT FIGURE 5
GREENSPAN (tNO SCALE
® TRANSIT PRIORITY AREAS (TPAs) IN ANAHEIM
JEFFERSON STREET LOGISTICS YARD, ANAHEIM
TABLE 1
PROJECT TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES AND FORECAST'
JEFFERSON STREET TRAILER STORAGE, ANAHEIM
ITE Land Use Code /
Daily
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Enter
Exit
Total
Enter
Exit
Total
Project Description
2-Way
Trip Generation Rates:
■ Truck Trailer Storage (TE/Parking space) 2
0.946
0.029
0.033
0.062
0.025
0.027
0.052
■ 712: Small Office Building (TE/TSF)
14.39
82%
18%
1.67
34%
66%
2.16
Proposed Project Trip Generation Forecast.
■ Jefferson Street Trailer Storage (240 Trailer parking spaces)
227
7
8
15
6
6
12
Proposed Project Trip Generation
227
7
8
15
6
6
12
Historical/Entitled Trip Generation Forecast.
■ Truck Trailer Storage (95 Trailer parking spaces)
90
3
3
6
2
3
5
■ Office Building (2,670 SF)
38
3
1
4
2
4
6
■ Truck Fueling Facility (3 fueling positions) 3
24
1
1
2
1
1
2
Total Historical/Entitled Trip Generation
152
7
5
12
5
8
13
Net Project Trip Generation Forecast
75
0
3
3
1
(2)
(1)
(Proposed Project vs. Historical/Entitled)
Notes:
■ TE/TSF = trip end per 1,000 SF
Source: Trip Generation, I Ith Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Washington, D.C. (2021).
Based on empirical data collected at three (3) existing truck trailer storage facilities:
Daily
2-Way
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Enter
Exit
Total
Enter
Exit
Total
Derived Site Trip Generation Rates (trios per trailer parkin space)
1.538
0.050
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.100
Vernon Site (5607 Santa Fe Avenue)
Carson Site (2315 E. Dominguez Street)
0.411
0.009
0.018
0.027
0.009
0.009
0.018
Torrance Site(20502 Denker Avenue)
0.888
0.029
0.029
0.058
0.016
0.021
0.037
Average of3 Sitesl
0.946
1 0.029
0.033
0.062
0.025
0.027
0.052
Conservatively assumes one (1) truck fueled per hour between 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM.