The URL can be used to link to this page

Attachment 4 - Trip Generation Memo3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92103 619-795-6086 www.CRAmobility.com TO: Kelly Rocha; Que Bonito Coffee FROM: Jonathan Sanchez, PE, TE, PTOE; CR Associates DATE: September 28, 2023 RE:Que Bonito Coffee – Trip Generation Analysis Technical Memorandum The purpose of this technical memorandum is to document the results of a trip generation analysis conducted for the Que Bonito Coffee project (the “Project”). Project Description The Que Bonito Coffee project (the “Project”) proposes to construct a coffee shop without a drive- through window on a site currently occupied by an office building, located at 700 South Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim. The Project will keep the two existing access points to the property which consist of a driveway on West Alomar Avenue and through the alley located immediately east of the property which intersects with West Alomar Avenue. No roadway or intersection geometry is proposed to be modified as a result of the project.Figure 1 displays the existing facility and location.Figure 2 displays the project site plan. Trip Generation The Proposed Project is anticipated to increase vehicular mobility in the area. Therefore, a trip generation analysis to compare both the Project and the existing office space was conducted. The project’s trip generation was estimated using trip rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. It is important to note that ITE’s Trip Generation Manual does not provide weekday (ADT) trip generation rates for a Coffee/Donut Shop without a Drive-Through Window (LU 936). Therefore, the ADT trip generation rate for a Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window (LU 937) was utilized to estimate the ADT for the Project. Additionally, pass-by trip rate information is not available in ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition) for LU 936. Therefore, weekday and peak hour pass-by trip rates were obtained from the most similar land uses found in the handbook which were Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating land use (LU 938) and Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window land use (LU 934).Table 1 displays a comparison between the existing office building and the Proposed Project. Excerpts from ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition and ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook (3rd Edition) can be found in Attachment A. Table 1 -Project Trip Generation Land Use Units Trip Rate ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Split In Out Trips Split In Out Existing Small Office Building (712) 1,547 sq.ft.1 14.39 / KSF 22 4 60:40 2 2 5 42:58 2 3 Proposed Project Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window (936) 1,240 sq.ft. 533.37 / KSF2 662 120 51:49 61 59 41 50:50 20 21 Pass-by Trips (83% of daily trips, 49% AM, 50% PM)3 --549 59 51:49 30 29 21 51:49 10 11 Net Total +91 +57 -+29 +28 +15 -+8 +7 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. CR Associates (2023) Notes: 1 Approximate size of office building measured using aerial imagery via Google Earth Pro and Nearmap. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Que Bonito Coffee Trip Generation Memorandum Page 2 Figure 1 - Project Location W Alomar Avenue S Euclid Street Figure 2 Site Plan Que Bonito Coffee Trip Generation Memorandum 6+((7127(6*(1(5$/ 6((*(1(5$/127(66+((7*6((6+((7*)25$%%5(9,$7,216$1'/(*(1'6((6+((76127(6:+(5(2&&856$//)($785(66+2:1+(5(,1$5((;,67,1*725(0$,181/(66127('27+(5:,6($1'6+28/'%(9(5,),(',17+(),(/'72&21),50(;7(176$1'',0(16,216$//(<6(8&/,'67*5$66 *5$66 7851/$1(+$/):$/. 3523/,1(7<3 3523/,1(7<3675((7&(17(5/,1(:$/20$5$9(+$/)2)52: 52:72&(17(5/,1( :$/.:$/.3523/,1(7<3 *5$66 3523/,1(7<3 '5,9(:$<&85%&87 %,.(/$1( 75$)),&/$1( 75$)),&/$1( %,.(/$1(675((7&(17(5/,1( '5,9(:$<&85%&87$//(<3523/,1(7<3 3523/,1(7<3 3523/,1(7<3 $'-$&(17%8,/',1* 13$5.,1* 13$5.,1* 13$5.,1* 13$5.,1* 1$&&(66,%/(9$13$5.,1* 1$&&(66,%/(9$1/2$',1* 6(7%$&.7<3 6(7%$&.7<3 6(7%$&.7<3 0,1'5,9($,6/(%$&.83 67$// 3$5.,1*&$/&8/$7,21 6)*5266 6)3$5.,1*63$&(6 5281'8372 3$5.,1*67$//5(48,5('3$5.,1*67$//63529,'(',1&/8',1*9$1$&&(66,%/(127(67$//6,)$/775$6+$&&(37(' $0& 6(7%$&. 13$5.,1* 13$5.,1* 253266,%/(75$6+ (1&/2685(7+,66327237,21% 167$,55$03 1%,.(5$&. 13266,%/(75$6+$5($237,21$ 3523/,1(7<3 1%2//$5'7<3 1/$1'6&$3( 287'2256($7,1*$5($6) 8/7,0$7(52:)8785( )6(7%$&.3$676(7%$&.)52: )6(7%$&. )%$&.2):$/.)((7%$&.83 3529,'(' $//(< 5(,1)25&(''5,9$%/(*5$66 $ $ $ $ 6,*+775,$1*/(126,*16 6,*+775,$1*/(126,*16 6,*+775,$1*/(126,*16 VI VI VI 5HQHZDO'DWH/,&(16 ('$5&+,7 (&767$7 ( 2)&$/,)2 51,$'$1,(: $5(7 7& 6/ 6&$/( 352-(&7180%(56(7,668$1&(12'$7(6+((77,7/(6+((77,7/( 127) 2 5& 2 16758 &7, 21 &,7<3/$1&+(&.12 7%'+7736&'%$5&+,7(&76&203+($0(5,*($9()8//(5721&$&21&(37'(95(9,(:&21&(37'(95(9( ' & % ( ' & % $ ) ) $ 48(%21,72&2))((6(8&/,'67$1$+(,0&$$VLQGLFDWHG 30$ 6,7()/2253/$1352326(' (8&/,'2)),&(%/'*6,7()/2253/$1352326('6(8&/,'67$1$+(,0&$6+((7127(6 .(<('127(6 .(<12.(<127('(6&5,37,21 .(<127(6 6,7()/2253/$1/(9(/(;,67,1* 352326(' 5,*+7785121/<5(9,1',9,'8$/6+((7,668$1&('$7( Que Bonito Coffee Trip Generation Memorandum Page 4 Conclusion As shown in the table, the Project is anticipated to generate a total of 662 daily trips, with 120 trips (61-in/59-out) during the AM peak hour and 41 trips (20-in/21-out) during the PM peak hour. However, because the existing site is currently occupied by an office building, the net increase of daily trips would be 640 daily trips, including an additional 116 (59-in/57-out) trips during the AM Peak Hour and 36 (18-in/18-out) trips more during the PM peak hour. Sincerely, Jonathan Sanchez, PE, TE, PTOE Lic. No. 2957 Que Bonito Coffee Trip Generation Memorandum Attachments Attachment A -ITE Trip Generation Manual Excerpts 214 Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition Table E.32 Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, PM Peak Period Land Use Code 934—Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window SEATS SIZE (1,000 SQ. FT. GFA)LOCATION WEEKDAY SURVEY DATE NO. OF INTERVIEWS TIME PERIOD PASS- BY TRIP (%) NON-PASS-BY TRIPS (%) ADJ. STREET PEAK HOUR VOLUME SOURCEPRIMARYDIVERTEDTOTAL —~2.6 Minn-St. Paul, MN 1987 50 3:00–7:00 p.m.25 27 48 75 —— —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 80 3:00–6:00 p.m.38 ——62 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 100 3:00–6:00 p.m.55 ——45 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 159 3:00–6:00 p.m.56 ——44 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 225 3:00–6:00 p.m.48 ——52 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 88 3:00–6:00 p.m.35 ——65 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock —<5.0 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 84 3:00–6:00 p.m.44 ——56 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock 88 1.3 Louisville area, KY 1993 —4:00–6:00 p.m.68 22 10 32 2,055 Barton- Aschman Assoc. 120 1.9 Louisville area, KY 1993 33 4:00–6:00 p.m.67 24 9 33 2,447 Barton- Aschman Assoc. 87 4.2 New Albany, IN 1993 —4:00–6:00 p.m.56 25 19 44 1,632 Barton- Aschman Assoc. 150 3.0 Louisville area, KY 1993 —4:00–6:00 p.m.31 31 38 69 4,250 Barton- Aschman Assoc. —3.1 Kissimmee, FL 1995 28 2:00–6:00 p.m.71 ——29 —TPD Inc. —3.1 Apopka, FL 1996 29 2:00–6:00 p.m.38 ——62 —TPD Inc. —2.8 Winter Springs, FL 1995 47 2:00–6:00 p.m.66 ——34 —TPD Inc. —4.3 Longwood, FL 1994 304 2:00–6:00 p.m.62 ——38 —TPD Inc. —3.2 Altamonte Springs, FL 1996 202 2:00–6:00 p.m.40 39 21 60 —TPD Inc. —2.9 Winter Park, FL 1996 271 2:00–6:00 p.m.41 41 18 59 —TPD Inc. —3.3*several 1996 varies 4:00–6:00 p.m.62 ——38 — Oracle Engineering *Average of several combined studies. Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 50 “—” means no data were provided 213Appendix E: Database on Pass-By, Diverted, and Primary Trips Table E.31 Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, AM Peak Period Land Use Code 934—Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window SEATS SIZE (1,000 SQ. FT. GFA)LOCATION WEEKDAY SURVEY DATE NO. OF INTERVIEWS TIME PERIOD PASS-BY TRIP (%) NON-PASS-BY TRIPS (%)ADJ. STREET PEAK HOUR VOLUME SOURCEPRIMARYDIVERTEDTOTAL —<5 Chicago suburbs, IL 1987 84 7:00–9:00 a.m.44 ——56 —Kenig, O’Hara, Humes, Flock 88 1.4 Louisville area, KY 1993 —7:00–9:00 a.m.62 22 16 38 1,407 Barton-Aschman Assoc. 100 3.6 Louisville, KY 1993 —7:00–9:00 a.m.32 47 21 68 437 Barton-Aschman Assoc. 87 4.2 New Albany, IN 1993 —7:00–9:00 a.m.46 23 31 54 1,049 Barton-Aschman Assoc. 150 3.0 Louisville area, KY 1993 —7:00–9:00 a.m.43 14 43 57 2,903 Barton-Aschman Assoc. —3.3 varies 1996 —6:00–9:00 a.m.68 ——32 —Oracle Engineering Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 49 “—” means no data were provided 216 Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition Table E.33 Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday Land Use Code 938—Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating (Coffee/Espresso Stand) SIZE (1,000 SQ. FT. GFA)LOCATION WEEKDAY SURVEY DATE NO. OF INTERVIEWS TIME PERIOD PASS-BY TRIP (%) NON-PASS-BY TRIPS (%) SOURCEPRIMARYDIVERTEDTOTAL 0.1 Vancouver, WA Nov. 1997 69 6:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.83 ——17 Kittelson & Associates Inc. “—” means no data were provided Table E.34 Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday Land Use Code 938—Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window and No Indoor Seating (Coffee/Espresso Stand) EMPLOYEES LOCATION WEEKDAY SURVEY DATE NO. OF INTERVIEWS TIME PERIOD PASS-BY TRIP (%) NON-PASS-BY TRIPS (%) SOURCEPRIMARYDIVERTEDTOTAL 1 Vancouver, WA Nov. 1997 70 6:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.83 ——17 Kittelson & Associates Inc. 1 Woodburn, OR Feb. 1998 109 6:00 a.m.–6:00 p.m.95 ——5 Kittelson & Associates Inc. 1 Vancouver, WA Feb. 1998 83 6:00 a.m.–1:00 p.m.89 ——11 Kittelson & Associates Inc. Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 89 “—” means no data were provided Table E.35 Pass-By and Non-Pass-By Trips Weekday, AM Peak Period Land Use Code 944—Gasoline/Service Station SIZE (1,000 SQ. FT. GFA) VEHICLE FUELING POSITIONS LOCATION WEEKDAY SURVEY DATE NO. OF INTERVIEWS TIME PERIOD PASS-BY TRIP (%) NON-PASS-BY TRIPS (%)ADJ. STREET PEAK HOUR VOLUME SOURCEPRIMARYDIVERTEDTOTAL 2.3 6 Gaithersburg, MD 1992 37 7:00–9:00 a.m.32 41 27 68 2,080 RBA 2.1 6 Bethesda, MD 1992 26 7:00–9:00 a.m.58 23 19 42 2,080 RBA 1.7 6 Wheaton, MD 1992 21 7:00–9:00 a.m.67 14 19 33 900 RBA 2.0 8 Gaithersburg, MD 1992 46 7:00–9:00 a.m.87 13 0 13 2,235 RBA 1.2 6 Damascus, MD 1992 21 7:00–9:00 a.m.43 28 29 57 870 RBA 0.3 12 Wheaton, MD 1992 36 7:00–9:00 a.m.61 8 31 39 3,480 RBA Average Pass-By Trip Percentage: 58 “—” means no data were provided