59R-5416
.-,
RESOLUTION NO. 5h16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A VARIANCE (NO. 1133).
"'~.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from the prop-
erty owners ~~I~xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx of certain real prop-
erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follows:
Lots 24 to 34, both inclusive, of Tract No. 2489; and
Lots 35 to 39, both inclusive, of Tract No. 2489, as
shown on a map recorded in Book 83, Pages 5, 6 and 7
of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder of Orange County, California.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pub-
lic hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said peti-
tion on June 29. 1959 , notices of which said public
hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiga-
tion and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt its Resolution No. 2~O , recommending to the City Coun-
cil of the City of Anaheim that ariance No. 1133 be granted .,..x
IK.X..K.III...X.IXI..XI.XXX..x....l.ll..; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied to the property in
question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
/.-......
4. That the granting of such variance will not ad-
versely affect the comprehensive general zoning
plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the
same is hereby granted to NIGEL INVEST~ffiNT CO. and MARGO INVESTMENT
CO., 144 South La Brea Avenue, Los Angeles 36, California, permitting
an .8 foot adjustment in the widths of Lots 24 to 39, both inclusive,
of Tract No. 2489 hereinabove described.
-1-
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such
variance permit ror good cause or railure or said owner~, their
~-..~ successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim Municipal
Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is
granted ror the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code unless
otherwise speciried herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this
11th day or Auoust , 19 S9 .
MAYoflJ~I~.Jte
AT~ST:
~ -~ --.. ~, - .
cITlCtERK OF THir--;;~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk or the City or Anaheim, do
hereby certiry that the roregoing resolution was introduced and
adopted at a reoular meeting provided by law, of
the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 11th day of
Auoust , 19 S9 ., by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Borden, Coons, Fry, Pearson and Schutte.
NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
And I rurther certiry that the Mayor or the City or Ana-
heim approved and signed said resolution on the 11th day of
AUQust, 19 S'9 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal or the City of Anaheim this llthday of AUQust
19 Sg .
>>
~~~~F' ~~ff'OF~ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
-2-
...."---"."~.- -__.o~'''''.,.~'''.''' -. "'<f
-, ~""~'''^''-'-''';''~''~''"--''''~--'.'.._''~~'___b"____