Loading...
58R-4944 ,- RESOLUTION NO. 4944 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGH- WAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF HASTER STREET. WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim desires to improve Haster Street, from Orangewood Avenue to 1300', more or less, Northerly; and WHEREAS, Haster Street is an important artery in the County of Orange and of general County interest; and WHEREAS, Article 2 and Article 3, Chapter 9, Division 2 of the Streets and Highways Code authorizes a County, if it so desires, to expend funds apportioned to it out of the California Highway Users Tax Fund for aid to any City in the improvement, construction or repair of a street within a City; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors intends to, by ap- propriate action, provide in the County budget of the Special Road Improvement Fund for the Fiscal Year 1959-60 a sum of money for the improvement of streets within the incorporated cities of the County in accordance with the Orange County Arterial Highway Finan- e ing Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Counc i1 of the City _of Anah~~im_heTe'px.requests the Board of Supervisors of the County-of Orange to allocate to said City from County Funds the amount of $5,000, said amount to be matched by funds from said City, to be used to aid said City in the improvement of Haster Street, from Orangewood Avenue to 1300', more or less, Northerly, and for the acquisition of necessary rights of way; said improve- ments and acquisition of rights of way to be in accordance with the attached project statement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby requested to find that said work and acquisition of rights of way on Haster Street, in the manner provided, is in the general County interest. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, by this Resolution, the City of Anaheim agrees with the basic concepts of the Arterial Highways Financing Program; and further agrees that its share of the cost of improvements and rights of way will be available for the fiscal year 1959-60. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, and a certified copy to the County Surveyor and Road Commissioner, Court House Annex, Santa Ana, California ,- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 23rd day of December, 1958. >~) /~? /' /../ -....) '-..... C ...:-/ /7 -e~.. MAYO 0 AHEIM ATTEST: Cft~ctERK ~j' THE 1::In/'~FANAHEIM " STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORAKGi; ) 5 5 . CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DINE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing ResGlutian was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Couficil of the. Ci trof Anaheim, held on the 23rd day of December, 1958, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Borden, Fry, Schutte and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None AND I FURTHER CBITIFY that the Mayor of theC1ty' af Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution on the 23rd day of December, 1958. IN-WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto Set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City Of Ananeim t~is23rd day of December, 1958. I.., I.., " ' ?...... ..~ ..#. . 'c<;tt~LE:: OF .f~ ~~Lb;-r;NAHEiM (SEAL ) " ~~, PRELIMINARY PROJECT STATEMENT ARTERIAL HIGftlAY FI~ING PROGRAM CITY OF ANAHEIM Committee Use Only M_P_S_O_ AD! Funds FY No. Arterial Classif. SECONDARY , Name of St:reet Limits of Improvement HASTER Orangewood to 1300' N1v. Length . 25 mi. A. EXISTING STREET MTA 1. Right of Way Min. ~8 ft. ::fB8 ~~ Max 60 l~: ~ ~g ~ 2. Pavement Wiath Min. ft. Max ?O 3. Curb from CIL Min. 0 ft. 0 ~a Max 0 ft. 0 ~ 4. ADT '~;'t.'(.' Estimated ~ 04/ Counted Date. Trucks ~ 5. Minimum o. Traffic Lanes .2 Width 10 ft. 6. Parking a Diagonal - One Side Parallel .. One Side None - One Side Two Sides e Two Sides) Two Sides B. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT 7. Minimum Right of Way 60 ft.a Ultimate R/w . 90 ft. B. Minimum Width of Pave_nt 24 ft.. Ultimate Width 64 ft. 9. Curbs from CIL Street None ft.a Ultimate Dist. 32 ft. 10. Est. ADT 10 yrs. Trucks ~ 11. Traffic Lanes 4 Width 12 ft. 12. Parking. None One Side e Two Sides) Part Time C. PROJECT DATA 13. Survey and Plans 14. Right of Way 15. Construction 16. Inspection 17. Total Estimated Cost Est. Cost $ Est. Cost $ Est. Cost $ Est. Cost $ of Project $ City City City City 10.000 Work by Worlt by Work by Work by County County County County x D. SClJRCE OF J:UNDS (Explain under Relllarks) City County other Total Survey and Plana Riah~ ~~ W~ Cons r.. ti. Insoection TOTAL $5.000 $5.000 ~10.000 $510.0.0 $5.600 $10.000 1959-60 (Explain below) lB. Earliest date City will have funds available 19. Is this stage construction Yes X No. No. of yr.. 20. Remarks: ,ro"';"';' /1' ~~A~~ City Official Thornton Piersall, ( , City Enaineer T1 Ue NOTE: Draw Typical Section on Back of Sheet. no......o.mha-r 10, 10"R Date ,,,.,~.,,_'-"-'..-~. ............... "'~ ,.~---"'"'_..^~.---""',..=----,~.,.. ~ I .1. I .. , ! !--- 45' ~f' 4~' ~ ~ :1 i I ---j ~ ~ - .. 2.. c.' r;" ... ".- 'a-l \~ i , "'"! i ! it . 1\ '-~' PM";:,.