11 (28)
Susana Barrios
From: tonycabanilla <
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2024 8:42 PM
To: Ashleigh Aitken <AAitken@anaheim.net>; Norma C. Kurtz <NKurtz@anaheim.net>; Natalie Rubalcava
<NRubalcava@anaheim.net>; Jose Diaz <JoDiaz@anaheim.net>; Carlos A. Leon <CLeon@anaheim.net>; Stephen Faessel
<SFaessel@anaheim.net>; Natalie Meeks <NMeeks@anaheim.net>
Cc: Berenice Ballinas <BBallinas@anaheim.net>; Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net>; Jose M. Barriga
<JMBarriga@anaheim.net>; t.deutsch@orccd.com; maribel@maribelmarroquin.com; k.rivers@orccd.com;
Cynthia@Ward-Associates.net; nhatch@fea.net
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] PUBLIC COMMENT: Opposition to accepting 19-years old EIR No. 331 with recent Addendum in lieu
of current and full EIR of the proposed cemetery at Gypsum Canyon that is required by CEQA
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
The following is a statement of OPPOSITION to accepting 19-years old Environmental Impact Report No.
331 with recent Addendum in lieu of current and full Environmental Impact Study and Review of the
proposed cemetery at Gypsum Canyon that is required by California Environmental Quality Act, from a
local resident in Orange County for inclusion in the public record of the Anaheim City Council Public
Hearings, item 11 of the posted Agenda of the Council meeting of July 23, 2024.
To: Anaheim Mayor Ashleigh Aitken
To: Mayor Pro Tem Norma Campos Kurtz
To: Council Member Natalie Meeks (District 6)
To: Anaheim City Council
Cc: Ms. Berenice Ballinas, Chief of Staff to Mayor Aitken
Cc: Mr. Nick Taylor, Senior Planner, Planning and Building Department
Cc: Jose M. Barriga, Associate Planner, Planning and Building Department
1
Cc: General Manager Tim Deutsch, Orange County Cemetery District
Cc: Board of Trustees, Orange County Cemetery District
Cc: Managers, Orange County Cemetery District
Re: Opposition to accepting 19-years old EIR No. 331 with recent Addendum in lieu of current and full EIR
of the proposed cemetery at Gypsum Canyon that is required by CEQA
Dear Mayor Aitken, Dear Mayor Pro Tem Rubalcava, Dear Council Member Natalie Meeks, and Dear
Members of Anaheim City Council:
I am OPPOSED to accepting 19-years old Environmental Impact Report No. 331 with recent Addendum in
lieu of current and full Environmental Impact Study and Review of the proposed cemetery at Gypsum
Canyon that is required by California Environmental Quality Act.
Please, DO NOT accept the 19-years old EIR No. 331 with its recent Addendum in lieu of full and new
Environmental Impact Study and Review for the current cemeteries at Gypsum Canyon project, and,
please, DO REQUIRE that a full and new Environmental Impact Study and Review be completed and
submitted to public scrutiny and challenges, instead, as required by the law and other regulations, in
particular, CEQA.
Best regards,
Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device
2