58R-4632
-
RESOLUTION NO. 4632
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE VARIANCE
NO. 986.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as follows:
Lot 2, in Block A, Anaheim Villa Tract, as per
map recorded in Book 14, at Page 44 of Miscel-
laneous Records of Los Angeles County, California.
(Said property is located at 918 West Center Street,
Anaheim. )
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon
said petition on June 16, 1958, notices of which said public
hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions
of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, in-
vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 286 -- Series 1957-58,
recommending to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that
Variance No. 986 be granted upon the conditions therein set
forth; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by
the City Planning Commission in granting said variance and
did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 15th day of
July, 1958, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall in the City
of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given
as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hear-
ing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did
thereupon consider the recommendations of the City Planning
Commiss ion; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of
all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied the subject
property.
2. It appears that the subject property can
be adequately developed and used under
the present zone.
-1-
c__
-,
r--
PAR.C~ 3: The North 5 acres of the East half of the Northeast
quar er of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 4 South,
lange 11 West, S.B.B. & M.;
EXCEPT that portioa sold to t he State of California for road
purposes.
be changed from R-A RE~IDENTLAL-AGRlCULtuRAL ZONE. to the following zoaesl
.pon the conditions hereinafter set forth:
That the northeast corner of Parcel 3 for a depth of 330 feet
from the center line of Lincoln Avenue, and more particularly
described as the East 1.4 acres of the North 5 acres of the
East half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of
Section 14, Township 4 South, Range 11 West, S.B.B. & M., he
changed to C-3, HEAVY-CQWIERCIAL ZONE; and
That the reaalnder of suhj~ct property he changed to C-l,
IfEIGHBORII:lOD-CONMERClAL ZOJlE,
upon the following conditions:
1. That the owners of subject property place of record standard
City of Anaheim C-l aad- C-3 Deed Restrictions, approved by
the City Attora~, covering the respective areas.
2. That this reclassification of subject property to C-l and C-3
shall not beco.e effective until precise plans for the de-
velopment of the property have beea presented to the City
Council and approved by it. c
3. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along
Lincoln and Stanton Avenues, such as curbs and ~tt.rs, side-
walks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities or other
pertineat work he complied with as required by the City Engineer
within 90 days after the approval of precise plans fer the de~
velopment of subject property, or a bond, approved by the City
Attorney, posted with the City in an amount sufficient to
cover the cost of said improvements as required by the City
Engineer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney be, and he is
herehy,authorlzed and directed to prepare and submit to the City
Council an amendment to Article IX, Chapter 2 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code to amend said Anaheim Municipal Code to accomplish the object
herein found and determined to be necessary and proper.
15ta
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me th~s
day of JulY l> 19 58 0
;I:ST'
.. .. il~~-~ ?'~IM.
).' \ //1
&'/-- . / J /_.../
~~.~~
,"-"-
-2-