Loading...
19 (5) Susana Barrios From: K Clark < Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 6:31 AM To: Scott Koehm <SKoehm@anaheim.net>; Jose M. Barriga <JMBarriga@anaheim.net> Cc: Ashleigh Aitken <AAitken@anaheim.net>; Norma C. Kurtz <NKurtz@anaheim.net>; Natalie Rubalcava <NRubalcava@anaheim.net>; Jose Diaz <JoDiaz@anaheim.net>; Carlos A. Leon <CLeon@anaheim.net>; Stephen Faessel <SFaessel@anaheim.net>; Natalie Meeks <NMeeks@anaheim.net>; Berenice Ballinas <BBallinas@anaheim.net>; Nicholas J. Taylor <NJTaylor@anaheim.net> Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] OPPOSITION to the draft Report on Cemeteries at Gypsum Canyon in Anaheim Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. The following is a statement of OPPOSITION to the draft Report on Cemeteries at Gypsum Canyon in Anaheim, from a local resident in Orange County for inclusion in the public record of the Anaheim City Planning Commission To: City of Anaheim Principal Planner Mr. Scott Koehm To: Mr. Jose M. Barriga, Associate Planner, Planning and Building Department Cc: Anaheim Mayor Ashleigh Aitken Cc: Mayor Pro Tem Norma Campos Kurtz Cc: Anaheim City Council Cc: Ms. Berenice Ballinas, Chief of Staff to Mayor Aitken Cc: Mr. Nick Taylor, Senior Planner, Planning and Building Department July 24, 2024 Statement of OPPOSITION to the draft Report on Cemeteries at Gypsum Canyon in Anaheim Dear Messrs. Koehm and Barriga, Dear Anaheim Planning Commission: This is a statement of OPPOSITION to the draft Report on Cemeteries at Gypsum Canyon in Anaheim for inclusion in the public record of the Anaheim City Planning Commission. Despite hundreds of objections emails from the local residents that the Anaheim City Council and the Planning Commission have received earlier this year, the Planning Commission has incorrectly concluded that the planned civilian cemetery at Gypsum Canyon will not have a negative impact on the 1 environment, nearby residents, and traffic in surrounding areas. Below are the major flaws of the draft of the Report that the Planning Commission is going to discuss and will attempt to approve during its meeting on June 17, 2024. 1. The Environmental Impact Report that California law requires before any approval is 19-years-old and was done for a totally different project. Here is a link to the most recent (May 17, 2024) report titled ``Focused Technical Review and Feasibility Assessment of the Proposed Veterans Cemetery Gypsum Canyon Site, Anaheim, California'' by Geosyntec Consultants, a renowned consulting and engineering firm: https://irvine.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id Regards, K. Kuklinski Summit Court Anaheim Hills, CA. 92808 2