Loading...
1967-021 RESOLUTION NO. 67R- 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF M~ AGREE~lliNT WITH THE STA'l'E OF CALIFORNIA, DEPAR'rr'.lENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, WITH REFERENCE TO THE KATELLA AVENUE RAILROAD UNDERPASS. WHEREAS, pursuant to the prov~s~ons of Section 189 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Public utilities Commis- sion of the State of California established by Decision No. 70134, issued on December 21, 1965, a Priority List of Grade Separation Projects for the year of 1966; and WHEREAS, said Priority List includes a project pro- posed by the City of Anaheim for elimination of an existing crossing at grade of the track of The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, (hereinafter referred to as i1Railway") at Katella Avenue (Grade Crossing No. 2-170.5) in the City of Anaheim, Orange County; and WHEREAS, by Decision No. 71244, dated September 6, 1966, the Public utilities Commission authorized the construc- tion of said project, consisting of a railroad underpass to be identified as Crossing No. 2-l70.5-B and the abandonment and closure of existing Grade Crossing No. 2-170.5, and on Septem- ber 22, 1966, the City and Railway entered into an agreement for the construction of said project which agreement provides that Railway will contribute the sum of $21,980 as capitalized savings plus 10% of the cost of the structure as shown in red on attached print entitled Exhibit nAil; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that sufficient funds are available to finance the City's share of the project cost, and that all other matters prerequisite to awarding a construc- tion contract within a period of six months have been or will be taken care of within that time; and ~~EREAS, the California Highway Commission on October 19, 1966, allocated the sum of $384,470, which sum represents half the estimated cost of the participating portion of said project after deducting Railway's contribution, and will be used to finance the State's share of said cost, as required by Section 190 of the streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the City and the State desire to enter into an agreement with reference to the construction of said project by the City, to set forth the types of costs attributable to the participating project, and to provide for reimbursement to the City by the state of its share of said costs; and \rTrlEREAS, the State of California, Department of Public ~~orks, Division of Highways has tendered to the City a form of agreement to be made and entered into between the parties, which agreement the City Council finds would be for the benefit and best interest of the city and should be approved. NOW, THEHEFOHE, BE I'l' RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the agreement tendered to the City by the State of California, Department of Public \vorks, Division of Highways, to be made and entered into between the parties, -1- providing for the construction of said Katella Avenue railroad underpass and for reimbursement to the City by the State of its share of the costs, upon the terms and conditions and in the manner specified in said agreement, and as hereinafter set forth, be, and the same is hereby approved. The terms, conditions, etc. of said agreement read as follows: !II. City hereby certifies it :las sufficient funds available to finance its share of the project cost. 2. The costs attributable to the participating project are limited to the following: (a) Right of way: The cost of right of way shall include condemnation attorney fees, the actual pay- ment to property owners for right of way obtained, the right of way agent's time plus travel expense and normal payroll additives, and the cost of clearing the right of way, including utility relocation costs to the extent required by law, less the value of excess lands obtained in such transactions. (b) Engineering: Preliminary engineering shall include the actual time of engineers and designers plus travel expense and normal payroll additives. (c) Construction costs: The amounts actually paid to the contractor and the amounts directly expended for field supervision and inspection, including travel expense, normal payroll additives, laboratory tests, work by Railway forces and Western Union forces if any, shall constitute construction costs. (d) Direct incidental costs: Direct incidental costs shall be limited to cost of advertising for bids, and cost of insurance and performance bonds. (e) All additives, overhead, or administrative costs, other than those mentioned above, are excluded from the determination of the cost of the project. 3. City, in cooperation with Railway, will undertake said grade separation project, which project consists of acquisition and clearing of necessary rights of way, preliminary and construction engineering, work by Railway forces, and Western Union forces if any, and construction of said project. 4. As promptly as possible, and in any event within one year after the making of the allocation by the Highway Commission, City shall award a contract for construction of said project pursuant to the laws governing City in the advertising and award of public construction contracts, and in conformance with plans and specifications prepared by or on behalf of City. 5. Within 60 days after award of contract by City for construction of the project and upon being furnished with a copy of the executed contract and the plans and specifications, and an itemized statement from City showing expenditures actually and necessarily made by City prior to award of contract for preliminary -2- engineering and rights of way directly connected with the project, state will reimburse city for a portion of said expenditures equal to the product obtained by multiplying said expenditures by the ratio of State's estimated share of the total project cost to such total project costs. 6. Thereafter, as the work progresses, upon being furnished with copies of the ,contractor's progress estimates, or other proof satisfactory to state as to amounts actually paid the contractor and neces- sarily expended directly for field supervision and inspection, state will promptly reimburse City, up to the total amount allocated for the project by the Highway Commission, for a portion of the amount of said payments to the contractor, and the amounts expended by city directly for field supervision and inspection, equal to the product obtained by multi- plying said expenditures by the ratio of state's estimated share of the total project cost to such total project cost. 7. Within 60 days after completion of the work and acceptance-thereof by City, a detailed statement of the actual direct cost of the project will be prepared by City and furnished to State whereupon a final accounting will be made based on the actual direct cost of the work to the City (using the definitions of costs herein prov~ded). State's share of said actual cost will be equal to one-half of the actual direct cost of the State participating portion of the project, after deducting therefrom the amount of the Railway's contribution, whether in form of cash, or railroad work, or a combination thereof. state will at that time pay City the balance, if any, of state's share of said costs, not exceeding the total amount allocated for the project by the Highway Commission. If upon the final accounting it develops that state previously paid more than its share of said participating portion of the project cost, computed in said manner, City will refund to state the difference between state's share of said participating portion of the project cost, and the amount paid by State. 8. The total project limits and that Dortion for determination of state's participation are defined on Exhibit IIAII attached hereto and made a part hereof. II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk be and they are hereby authroized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the city of Anaheim. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this lOth day of January, 1967. ~(l7~~ bffiYOR OF THE CITY OF M~ EIM ATTEST: )x~ OF -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DENE 14. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 67R-2l was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the lOth day of January, 1967, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Chandler, and Krein NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 67R-21 on the lOth day of January, 1967. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the .official seal of the City of Anaheim this lOth day of January, 1967. ( SEAL) ~ fro ~4~ CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 67R-21 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on January 10, 1967. ~~~.;.~ City Clerk