57R-4074
.-
RESOLUTION NO. 4074
....-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 797.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, described as follows:
The South 325.07 feet of the East half (E!>
of the Southeast quarter (SEt> of the Southwest
quarter (ail> of Section 14, Township 4 South,
Range 11 West, S.B.B.&M. in the County of Orange,
State of California; EXCEPT the North 162.53 feet
thereof, also EXCEPT the West 530.60 feet thereof;
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 5, 1957, notices of which said public hearing were
duly given, as required by law and the provisions of Seotion
9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection. investigation and studies made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 2~
Series 1957-58, recommending that Variance No. 797 be granted
upon the conditions therein set forth; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim pro-
testing the action of the City Planning Commission granting
said variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on
the 3rd day of September, 1957, at 7:00 o'clock P. M., in the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such publio
hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such public
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportun-
ity to be heard; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find that:
-
1. There is no substantial property
right possessed by other property
in the same vicinity and zone and
denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property
can be adequately developed and used
under the present zone.
-1-
.~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission granting Variance No. 797 requesting permission to
use the property hereinabove described for an automobile
repair shop and residence be, and the same is hereby disapproved,
and that Variance No. 797 be, and the same is hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this )rd day of September, 1957.
/ / ""
~y~~;~7@5F~~
ATTEST:
L~ -~.
aITY CLE~F ~/'6~o' MiEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF ANAHEIM
)
) ss.
)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was introduced and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting
provided by law of the City Council of the City of Anaheim,
held on the )rd day of September, 1957, by the following
vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry and
Wisser
NOES:
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNCILMEN: Schutte.
ABSENT:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 3rd
day of September, 1957.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
]rd day of September, 1957.
~ " c.Y'
/~atE~t ~~~HEIM
.~
-2-