57R-3829
-
HESOLUTION NO. 3829
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VAHIANCE NO. 725.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition from the authorized agent of the
property owner of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follo.ors:
Lot 94, Tract 165 and approximately 180 feet
of frontage on Placentia Avenue adjoining Lot
94, Tract 165 (residual portion of the original
Teasdale Hanch).
(Said property is located at the Southwest cor-
ner of Placentia Avenue and Anaheim-Olive Hoad.)
ANDVlHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon
said petition on March 18, 1957, notices of which said public
hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200. J.7 of t:ne Anaheim };lunicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, in-
vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. 190 -- Series 1956-57,
recommending that Variance No. 725 be denied; and
vffiEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was foiled wi th the Oi ty Council of the City of Anaheim protest-
ing the action of the City Planning Commission denying said
variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on the
23rd day of April, 1957, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., in the City Hall
in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was
duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17
of the Anaheim 1.1unicipal Code; and
\1HEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied the subject
property.
.r-
2. It appears that the subject property can
be adequately developed and used under the
present zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
-1-
-
,..-.
r-,..
f
Commission denying Variance No. 725, requesting permission to
establish, maintain and operate a drive-in restaurant facility
on the property hereina~ove described, be, and the same is
hereby, sustained, and that Variance No. 725 be, and the same
is hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION i$ approved and signed by
me this 2)rd day of April, 1957.
~
~~ .
. c~ OF T~IM
STATE OF CAL IFORNIA.
COUNTY OF ORANGE s s .
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the toregoing resolution
was introduoed and adopted at a regular meeting, provided
by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on
the 23rd day of April, 1957, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Cooas and Wisser
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Fry
ABSENT: COUNCILl>IEN: Hone
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 2Jrd
day of April, 1957.
IN WITNESS \VHEREOF, I ha,ve hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
23rd day of April, 1957.
~ ;;?;~'
~ OF THE ~~IM
(SEAL)
,-
-2-