57R-3787
-
-
RESOLUTION NO.
]787
./""'"
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COOJIICIL OF THE CITY
OF AJIIAI1EIII DEJllYUfG VARI.A1fCE NO. 694.
WHEREAS, the City Planni$g Co~ission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition from the property owners
and/or agent of certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as follows:
The West 170 feet of the North 171 feet of the
Northwest quarter (NWi) of the Northwest quarter
(NWi) of the Northeast ~arter (NEi) of Section
23, Township 4 South, Rartge 11 West, in Rancho
Los Coyotes, County of Orange, State of Cali-
fornia, as per map recor.ed in Book 51, Page 11
of lIiscellaneous Records on file in the Office
of the County Recorder of said County.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
upon said petition on February 18, 1957, notices of which
said public hearing were duly given as requir ed by law and
the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim lIunicipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, said Co~ission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports of-
fered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. 155 --
Series 1956-57, recommending that Variance No. 694 be dented;
and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adopticm of said resolution, a writt.nap-
peal was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim
protesting the action of.1h e City Planning Commission deny-
ing said variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing
on the 26th day of March, 1957, at 7:00 P.II., in the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hear-
ing was duly. given as required by law and the provisions of
Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim lIunicipal Code; and
,-....
~
,~
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of
all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council did close said hearing and did order the matter held
over to April 9, 1957 to allow for further investigation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the saae
vicinity and zone and denied the subject
property.
2. It appears that the subject property can
be adequately developed and used under
the present zone.
-1-
-.
-
r
NOlI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESf?LVED by the City Counc 11
of the City of Anaheim that the actiton of the City Planning
Co~ission denying Variance No. 69~, requesting per~ission
to construct, opera~e and maintain a service station on the
property hereinabove described, be, and the same is hereby,
sustained, and that VAR~ NO. 694 be, and the same is
hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 9th day of April, 1957.
~. ' thfiii?
. " c. '-. -
, . " -- :' .
~T:
~- /
- ~<F 1~IJw!E1lI.
STATE OF CALIFClUUA )
COUIITY OF ORAlfGE ) s s.
C I'I'Y OF AHAHE III )
I, DENE M. WILL~, City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was inttoduced and adopted at a regular meeting, provided
by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held
on the 9th day of Apr 11 , 1957,by the followi~ vote:
AYES: COUNC IIJIEN: pear.on, Coons, Sehu t te
and"llisser.
NOES: COUNC ILMEN : Fry.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
.AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anah.im approved and signed said resolution on the 9th
day of April, 1957.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
9th day of Apr 11, 1957.
L ~.
CITY c:;;;r OF. Of~DI.
(SEAL)
",-...
-2-