57R-3725
-.
,-.,
RESOLUTION NO. 3725.
r-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 693.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owners of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, more particularly described and
set forth in said Petition for Zoning Variance, Application
No. 693, and in Resolution No. 149 -- Series 1956-57 of the
City Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon
said petition on February 4, 1957, notices of which said
public hearing were duly given as required by law and the
provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports of-
fered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No.' 149 __
Series 1956-57, hereinabove referred to, recommending to
the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Variance No.
693 be granted upon the conditions stated in said resolution;
and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, written appeals
were filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim pro-
testing the action of the City Planning Commission granting
said variance, and said appeals were set for public hearing
on the 12th day of March, 1957, at 7:00 Of clock P.M., in the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public
hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions
of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of
all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the
City Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied the sub-
Ject property.
2. It appears that the subject proparty can
be adequately developed and used under the
present zone.
r
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission granting Variance No. 693, requesting permission
to erect a BOWLING ALLEY and RESTAtmANT on the property
described in said Petition for Zoning Variance, Application
No. 693, be, and the same is hereby, disapproved, and that
Variance No. 693 be, and the same is hereby, denied.
-1-
,-.-
..-..
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed
by me this 12th day of March. 1957.
r--
,,'-I "'
rJA<ii:i~a~
~- ~." .
C ' LER(~ T~6~~IM.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORAJlKTE s 5 .
CITY OF ANAHE 1M
I. DENE M. WILLIAMS. City Clerk of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was introduced and adovted at a regular meeting, provided
by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held
on the 12th day of March, 1957, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Schutte
and Wi sser.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNC ILMEN: Fry.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the
City of Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on
the 12th day of March, 1957.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
12th day of March, 1957.
L /)n.
CITY ~LERK ~. c~~{M:~
(SEAL)
",-..
-2-