31 (080)
Susana Barrios
From: Jen McCool <
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2024 8:07 AM
To: Public Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net>
Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] Re: Salt
\[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification \]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless
you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Also here are some pictures from the fire that swept through. Was not able to take any while the flames with high
wind from the fire was outside and burned by my neighborhood. It was a sheer panic moment but I do have these
top of weir canyon.
1
2
3
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 27, 2024, at 12:23 PM, Jen McCool < wrote:
>
> I am very concerned about this project or any in the direct area.
> The impact is not accurately studied and it’s not realizing most of traffic is IE commuters.
> The impact report stating an extra 20 plus min added to the already ridiculous 2 hour evacuation was based on
traffic from last fire and now traffic is 10x as bad.
> The suggestion of road expansion is a nightmare idea in the sense it only creates more traffic for people coming
through and will relive 91 traffic into our streets.
> The school situation has not been addressed for god knows how many new students.
> Disappointed in comments that were out of line made my planning commission.
> Police and fire and having a difficult time responding in traffic as is.
> Residents, fire and police all realize we are in a high fire zone where people are not even able to get insured,
aside from that we can not control the IE traffic which is probably 75 percent of the issue.
> Please refer to Savi Ranch area two complexes were build here and right after three things happened. One traffic
impossible to get in and out. 2 businesses suffered from this and most have closed and 3 it has turned red on the
crime map and become a not so great abandoned area with the exception on Costco and Home Depot, which is
guarded by police a lot of the time.
> It is unfair to be able to walk to destination quicker then driving it is unfair to any sort of re zoning that puts
residents at risk. Even state housing man Tate will not build in a location the puts people at risk or in danger and
this is both.
> It’s unfair to re zone for profit not considering the aftermath or even caring. Let’s stick to the plan and the zones
and our master planned community where people have also heavily invested and sacrificed so much to live. We
have suffered enough
> Sent from my iPhone
4