Loading...
31 (083) Susana Barrios From:nagood6099@gmail.com Sent: 23 AM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Opposition to Development at Deer Canyon \[You don't o?en get email from Learn why this is important at h?ps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIden?fica?on \] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open a?achments unless you recognize the sender and are expec?ng the message. I am wri?ng in strong opposi?on to the proposed development at Deer Canyon in Anaheim Hills. First and foremost, the proposed ac?ons impede the health and safety of Anaheim residents, which were inappropriately dismissed by the majority of the planning commission, who do not reside near the proposed development and who even made remarks during their recent mee?ng that it is ?me for the people of Anaheim Hills to also bear the burden of development, as other residents in Anaheim have had to do. Unfortunately these type of comments fail to recognize that the proposed development is an area that has and con?nues to have a history of natural fire hazards, unlike other areas of Anaheim. No other residents of Anaheim have had to flee their homes during wildfires only to be faced with gridlocked traffic as they try to escape to safety. The proposed development will make this type situa?on even more precarious, significantly increasing evacua?on ?mes during a wildfire, and poten?ally cause catastrophic loss of life. We get it. Traffic and development is a fact of life throughout the city and Anaheim Hills should not and is not exempt from this. Our streets already experience major gridlock as commuters try to find alterna?ves to the 91 freeway. Each area of the city has different nuances, however, and the wildfire dangers in Anaheim Hills are unique and should not be ignored or pushed aside to accommodate this development. The fire department and police department both recommend against this development for a reason. Unfortunately most of the planning commission comprised of individuals vested in the needs of cons?tuents who do not reside in Anaheim Hills failed to heed the recommenda?ons of these experts. The City Council has a moral and legal obliga?on to its residents to do be?er than the planning commission. Surely you do not want to be negligent in going against the recommenda?ons of the experts in the Fire and Police departments and risk the health, safety, and poten?ally lives of Anaheim residents? Sincerely, Naomi Goodwin Concerned Anaheim Hills resident 1