57R-4196
--
RESOLUTION NO. 419'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A VARIANCE. (>>0. 852).
<.~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Ana-
heim did receive a petition from the property owner ---~~--
of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, Oounty of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Tke S.uth one-halt ot the Northeast quarter ot
the >>oriheaet ([uarter ot the Southeast quarter
ot Section 18, TownsDip 4 South, Baac. 19 West,
11l the RaRea. Los Co;rot.s, Clt;r ot Jaaaela,
Oouat;r ot 9.raage, State ot Oallfera1a, as per
MP reoorded ill ...k 51 pace 10 et K1soell.....u
Kapa, in the ettloe ot the OOWlt;r Record-or ot
aald O.unt;r.
B:XOBPT tae Horth 212.00 t.et tller.ot.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pub-
lic hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said peti-
tion on Dote.er 21, 1957 , notices of which said publio
hearings were duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Seotion 9200.17 of the Anaheim Munioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiga-
tion and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due
consideration of all evidenoe and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt its Resolution No. 92 ,recommending to the City Ooun-
oil of the City of Anaheim that Varianoe No. ai2 be granted upon
the conditions stated in said resolution; an
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the sarne vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied to the property in
question.
,.~
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not ad-
versely affect the comprehensive general zoning
plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the
same is hereby granted to OARL MAXWELL, 11452 Barclay Drive, Gardea
Grove, Oalitornla, to erect &ad operate a Xotel, with .vt.alag poel,
store bu1141ags &ad oottee shop on tae propert;r hereiaa.ove desorlbed,
sUDJect te the tollowlng condltlo.s:
-1-
."'~
1. The erection of the buildings in conformity with the plans
presented to the City Council and on 'file with the City;
except that the living rooms shall be enlarged to 12 feet
by 14 feet.
Z. That the owner of subject property deed to the City of
Anaheim a strip of land 57 feet in width, from the center
line of the street, along Brookhurst Street, for street
widening purposes.
). That the building set-back on Brookhurst Street be a minimum
of 50 feet from the property line.
4, That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim,
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and
paving, drainage facilities or other pertinent work be
oomplied with as required by the City Engineer.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such
variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner &kK~~_~_ his
heirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the AnaheimlMunicipal
Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is
granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code unless
otherwise specified herein.
5th
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
day of Noveaber
is signed and approved by me this
, 19 1]7 .
?~
& .. A~I1'-
4;;T'
'------ .... t,
'i-L ! /( ..::.-- dA, ~'-
CLEFfK ot Tlrt cfTY Or ANAHEfM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF ANAHEIM
)
) se.
)
I, DiNE M, WILLIAMS , City Clerk of the City of Ana-
heim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was introduced
and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting provided by law,
of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the I]th day
of November , 19-iZ-, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNOILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Sohutte and
Wisser.
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNOILMEN: None.
--
And I further certify that the Mayor of the Oity of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the 5th day of November
19...2l..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand' and affixed
the official seal of the Oi ty of Anaheim this 5th day of November
19 57
'-
(SEAL)
--.. .
):_~L ~-'- )A ~ ./~n><--
01 Y OLERK OF Tm: I. 0 ANAHEIM
-2-