63-0777RESOLUTION NO. 63R- 777
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE
18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL, CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUND-
ARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim has heretofore duly passed and adopted a resolution
recouuuending denial of a change in the boundaries of the zone
or zones hereinafter mentioned and described, after having
fixed a time and place for the holding of a public hearing
thereon in the manner and as prescribed in Title 18 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, and after having duly held and conducted
such public hearing to consider said proposed change of zone
or zones, and after having received evidence and reports from
persons interested therein; and.
WHEREAS, within a period of forty (40) days following
the hearing thereon, the Planning Commission did duly announce
by formal resolution its findings of facts and declare its
opinions and reasons for recommending denial of said proposed
change in the boundaries of the zone or zones hereinafter
mentioned and described; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said resolution, summary of
evidence, report of findings and recommendation of the City Plan-
ning Commission, the City Council did fix the 17th day of
September, 1963, as the time, and the City Council Chambers in
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim as the place for a public
hearing upon said proposed amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, and the exclusion of said property, hereinafter
described, from the zone in which it is now situated and the
incorporation thereof in the zones hereinafter set forth; and did
give notice thereof in the manner and foiui as provided in said
Title 18 of said Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did hold and conduct such public
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity
to be heard and did receive evidence and reports and did there-
upon consider the summary of evidence presented at said public
hearing before the Planning Commission, its report of findings
and recommendations; and.
WHEREAS, the City Council did find and determine the
following specific matters, to wit:
1. That the Northeast Industrial Area should be
retained as an area limited to industrial uses
and industrially related uses and should not be
developed for residential purposes.
2. That the exact boundaries for development of
the industrial area have never been established
but rather only general areas and boundaries
have been indicated for the industrial area.
3. That the subject property is in the general area
of the Northeast Industrial Area but is on the
62 -63 -112
periphery thereof, and that the subject prop-
erty is isolated from other properties in the
Northeast Industrial Area in the following
particulars, to wit:
(a) The property is bounded on the north by
Placentia -Yorba Boulevard, plus a raised
railroad track bed north of said Placentia
Yorba Boulevard which separates the prop-
erty from any industrially utilized
property in the City of Placentia.
(b) The property is separated on the west by
Dowling Avenue, a secondary highway, and
the property on the west side of said
Dowling Avenue, though considered generally
in the industrial area, is all zoned and
projected for commercial recreational
development.
(c) The subject property is separated at the
south by Orangethorpe Avenue, a primary
highway, plus a flood control channel run-
ning southerly of Orangethorpe Avenue and
approximately 100 feet to the south of
said Orangethorpe Avenue.
(d) The subject property, plus a small segment
of additional property easterly of subject
property, is bounded on the east by the
intersection of Orangethorpe Avenue and
Placentia -Yorba Boulevard, just south of
the raised railroad tracks.
4. That the peculiar circumstances of this property
with its location and topography do not lend them-
selves to an integrated industrial development and
are physically separated from other properties in
the industrial area so as to be impracticable for
development as an integrated project with other
properties in the Northeast Industrial Area.
5. That the utilization of this property for residential
purposes would not affect the development of the
Northeast Industrial Area for industrial purposes and
would not constitute an intrusion of residential
development in the Northeast Industrial Area which is
designated for industrial development.
AND WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine that
the amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code should be
adopted and that the property hereinafter described should be
excluded from the zone or zones in which it is now situated, and
incorporated in the zone or zones as hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and
the same is hereby amended, and that all of the property and area
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
Commencing at a point on the North line of Block G of
the Kraemer Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 12,
pages 87 and 88 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles
-2-
County, California, South 67 East 1867.4 feet from
a stone at the Northwest corner of said Block G;
thence South 87 East 811 feet; thence South 7 East
955 feet, more or less, to a point on the South
boundary of said Block G• thence South 73 32' West
811 feet; thence North 7 West 1227 feet, more or less,
to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 2:
A strip 10 feet wide along and adjoining the Westerly
side of the following described real property:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said. Block G,
said point of beginning being South 87 East 2678.4
feet from a stone at the Northwest corner of said.
Block G, and likewise being the Northeast corner of
that real property described in Registrar's Certificate
of Title No. 840; thence South 7 East 955 feet, more
or less, to a point in the South boundary line of said
Block G; thence North 73 32' East 551 feet, more or
less, to a point, said point being the Southwest corner
of land deeded. to Joseph Pauchon and. Rosalie Pauchon by
instrument recorded in Book 187, page 293 of Deeds,
records of Orange County, California; thence North 7
West 768.7 feet, more or less, to the North line of
said. Block G; thence North 87 West 550.31 feet, more
or less, to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 3:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said Block G
said point of beginning being South 87 East 2678.4
feet from a stone at the Northwest corner of said Block
G and likewise being the Northeast corner of that real
property described in Registrar's Certificate of Title
No. 840; thence South 7 East 955 feet, more or less,
to a point in the South boundary line of said. Bloc, G;
thence North 73 32' East 551 feet, more or less, to a
point, said point being the Southwest corner of the
land deeded. to Joseph Pauchon and Rosalie Pauchon by
instrument recorded in Book 187, page 293 of Deeds, of Orange County, California; thence North 7
West 768.7 feet, more or less, to the North line of
said Block G; thence North 87 West 550.31 feet, more
or less to the point of beginning.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Westerly 10 feet thereof.
now is R -A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL ZONE, and that it be excluded
from said zone and incorporated. in R -3, MULTIPLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONE, upon the following conditions:
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property shall
be recorded in the office of the Orange County
ecord.er.
2. That the completion of these reclassification pro
ceedings is contingent upon the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit.
3. That subject property shall be developed substan-
tially in accordance with plans and specifications
on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibits
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
and. 15" stubrnitted to and approved by the City
Council this date.
-3-
4. That the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
submitted by the applicants shall be approved
by the City Attorney and shall be recorded in
the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior
to or concurrently with the, recordation of an
approved Final Tract Map of subject property.
5. That tree wells shall be provided at approxima-
tely 40 -foot intervals in the Orangethorpe and
Dowling Avenues and Placentia -Yorba Boulevard
parkways abutting subject property, in both park-
ways of the collector streets on the east end of
subject property, and in the parkways of all
streets proposed to be developed within the
interior of said property; that plans for said
tree wells and the landscaping therein, shall be
submitted to and approved by the Superintendent
of Parkway Maintenance; and that said tree wells
shall be planted prior to final building
inspection.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Attorney be, and
he is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and submit to
the City Council an ordinance amending Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to accomplish the objects herein found and deter-
mined to be necessary and proper.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 1st day of October, 1963.
ATTEST:
Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
MAYOR OF CITY OF NAHE M
PRO TEM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, GENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 63R -777 was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of
the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the lst day of
October, 1963, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Coons
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor Pro Tem of the
City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 63R -777
on the 1st day of October, 1963.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim, this lst day
of October, 1963.
(SEAL)
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM