Loading...
63-0104WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 28 would be a legislative mandate compelling local agencies to enter into a contract not deemed by them to be mutually beneficial but designed for the primary benefit of only one party, to wit, the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District; and WHEREAS, such attempted legislative mandate would be an unwarranted invasion into home rule; and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District has an adequate and proper method of relieving its water situation by joining the Metropolitan Water District; and WHEREAS, the voters of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District have elected not to join the Metropolitan Water District and relieve their water situation,such action is a mandate of the people to accept the reduction in available water; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill No. 28 would in effect provide the facilities of the Metropolitan Water District to the use of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District without their joining and participating in the Metropolitan Water District in violation of the terms of the Metropolitan Water District Act and as such would operate as an unfair and unjust enrichment to the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, a non member of the Metropolitan Water District,to the detriment of all members of the Metropolitan Water District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anaheim does hereby express its unequivocal opposi- tion to Assembly Bill No. 28 and does respectfully request that the California Legislature vote solidly in opposition to this measure or any modification thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all Cities in Orange County and all members of the Metropolitan Water District be sent copies of this resolution and that they be urged to voice their opposi- tion to this Assembly Bill. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resolu- tion be sent to the Honorable John A. Murdy, Jr., State Senator, and to the Honorable William E. Dannemeyer, the Honorable James E. Whetmore, and the Honorable Robert E. Badham, State Assembly- men from Orange County. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 5th day of February, 1963. ATTEST: CITY'CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RESOLUTION NO. 63R 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 28. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 63R -104 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 5th day of February, 1963, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None AND 1 FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 63R -104 on the 5th day of February, 1963. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 5th day of February, 1963. (SEAL) CITY'CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM