56R-3506
--
RESOLUTION NO. 3506
A RESOLUTION DB' THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'l'HE
CITY OF AN~qEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 605
I"'""'
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as follows:
That property previously occupied by the Walt
Taylor Lumber Company at 125 North Manchester
Avenue. This property extends southeasterly
from the South line of applicant's present auto
wrecking plant, 240 feet along l'.Ianchester Ave-
nue and is approximately 265 feet deep, extend-
ing Westerly from Manchester, and is more
particularly described as follows:
PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 1 of Helen and Lynch's
Subdivision, as per map thereof recorded in Book
442, at page 158 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles
County, California, bounded and described as fol-
lows:
3eginning at a point in the Southwesterly line
of the State Highway as described in Parcel I in
deed recorded September 23, 1935, in Book 78, at
Page 108, of Official Records in the office of
the County Recorder of said Orange County, dis-
tant thereon North 4r39'06" West 24.61 feet from
the intersection of said Southwesterly line by
the Easterly line of said Lot 1, and running
thence South 77059' West 130 feet; thence North
47039'06" West, parallel with said Southwesterly
line, 120 feet; thence North 77059' East 130 feet
to said Southwesterly line of the State Highway;
thence South 4r39'06" .c<.:ast, along said South-
westerly line, 120 feet to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 2: That portion of Lot 1 of Helen and Lynch's
Subdivision, in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, as s~own on a map
thereof recorded in Book 442, at page 158 of Deeds,
records of Los Angeles County, California, bounded
and described as follows:
~
Beginning at a point in the Southwesterly line of
the State Highway, as described in Parcel 1 in
deed recorded September 23, 1935, in Book 780, at
page 108 of Official Records, in the office of the
County Recorder of said Orange County, distant
thereon North 47039'06" West 144.61 feet from the
intersection of said Southwesterly line by the
Easterly line of said Lot 1, and running thence
South 77059' West 130.00 feet; thence North 470
39'06" West, parallel with said Southwesterly
line, 120.00 feet; thence North 77059' East 130.00
feet to said Southwesterly line; thence South 470
39'06" East along said Southwesterly line 120 feet
to the point of beginning.
PARCEL 3: Beginning at a point in the North line of
that certain property described in deed recorded in
Book 109, page 162 deed records of Orange County,
California; said point being located 130.00 feet
-1-
-
.~
South 77059' ;,vest from the intersection of the
Southwesterly line of the State Highway as des-
cribed in Parcel 1 in Deed recorded September
25, 1935, in Book 780, page 108 of Official
Records of Orange County, California, with the
West boundary line of the City of Anaheim run-
ning from said point of beginning South 77059' _
West 15L~.35 feet to the Northeasterly right of
way line of the Southern Pacific Railway; thence
North 5r09 130" West lL~6 .69 feet along said right
of Ha}" line; thence North 0020 '30" West 113.89
to a point; thence North 77059' East 81.71 feet
to the Westerly corner of that certain parcel of
land conveyed to Edward Jt.Jagner and wife by deed
recorded September 5, 1946, in Book 1432, page
296 of Official Records of Orange County, Calif-
ornia; thence South 47~39'06" East 264.61 feet
to the point of beginning.
Reserving therefrom for egress and ingress the
right of way over the Southeasterly and South-
westerly 20 feet thereof.
Bein~ a part of Lot 1, Helen and Lynch Sub-
division.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearin7 at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
August 6, 1956, notices of which said public hearing Were duly
given, as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17
of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
~{EREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due in-
spection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due considerction of all evidence, and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 24, Series
1956-57 recommending that Variance No. 605 be denied for the
reasons therein stated; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the
date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was
filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denying said vari-
ance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on September
11, 1956, at 7:00 o'clock P.N., at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as re-
quired by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Ana-
heim Municipal Code; and
\~~EREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
heari.ng the Ci ty Council did duly }-lOld and conduct such public
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportu-
nity to be heard and did consider evidence and reports, and did
thereupon continue the matter to September 25, 1956, to allow
time for working out conditions to be established for this type
of business and for inspection of the premises; and
,.-..
WHEREAS, the Oi ty Council cid on September 25, 1956,
agree to grant said variance upon certain conditions hereinafter
set forth and did again continue the matter for a further period
to enable said applicant to submit plans to be passed upon by
the City Council; and
-2-
-
-.
WHEREAS, the City Council does ~ind that:
,----
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary cir-
cumstances or conditions applicable to the
property involved or to the intended use of
the property that do not apply generally to
the property or class of use in the same
vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substan-
tial property right possessed by other pro-
perty in the same vicinity and zone and
denied to the property in question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not
be materially detrimental to the public wel-
fare or injurious to the property or improve-
ments in such vicinity and zone in which the
property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not
adversely affect the comprehensive general
zoning plan.
NOW, Th~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and
the smne is hereby granted to Kenneth E. Clark, 137 North Man-
chester Avenue, Anaheim, California, to expand his automobile
wrecking yard to include the property hereinabove described,
upon the ~ollowing conditions:
1. That bla~topped off-street parking for
customers only be provided.
2. That the parking area be marked for stalls,
as per drawing submitted and on file with
the City o~ Anaheim.
3. That the property be surrounded with an eight-
foot corrugated iron or aluminum fence, to be
kept in good repair.
4. That a concrete block fence be installed where
shown on the drawing on file with the City of
Anaheim.
5. rfhat no materials be stacked so that they are
visible from the highway.
6. That signa shall be limited to one double-~aced
neon sign on poles as covered by the Building
Code; and one other sign parallel to the building,
which sign shall not exceed 2' x 8' in size.
,.,-
7. That said applicant shall ~lrnish to the City
of Anaheim a faith~ul perfDrmance bond in an
amount of $10,000.00 to assure proper upkeep
and compliance with conditions herein set forth.
8. That the buildings now located on the property
shall be brought up to and comply with building
code standards.
-3-
...-
-
".....
9. That all construction, alterations, etc.
shall be in accordance with plans and
drawings submitted and on file with the
Ci ty of Anaheim.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner or
his heirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim
Municipal Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said
variance is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Muni-
cipal Code unless otherwise specified herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION
this 9th day of October, 1956.
ATTEST:
~~-?f' ~~~&f l'NmIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Ana-
heim, do hereby certify that the ~oregoing resolution was intro-
duced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 9th day of
October, 1956, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson.
ABSENT: COUNCI~lliN: None.
And I further certify that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 9th day of
October, 1956.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal or the City of Anaheim this 9th day
of October, 1956.
, . '?/='
,"- I
,,~~.)/f ~ - . ,
ITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ~IM
(SEAL)
r"
-4-