56R-3422
~~~-,
/~
-
RESOLUTION NO.-2422
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A VARIANCE. (NO;:586)
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition from the property owner and/or
of certain real property situated in the-City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows: . h
Beginning at a point ~n t e center line of Broadway
748.)0 feet from its intersection withthe center line of
Bond Street; thence N 150 201 JOn W, 140.00 feet to a point;
thence N 740)6140" E, 120.86 feet to a point; thence
S 150201)0" E, 84.01 feet to the beginning of a curve concave
westerly having a radius of 15 feet; thence through a central
angle of 89057'1011 and a length of 2).55 feet to a point;
thence S 15020'30" E, 40.00 feet to a point in the center line
of Broadway; thence S 74036140" W, 105.87 feet along said
center line of Broadway to the point of beginning.
Subject to an easement over the South 40.00 feet
thereof for Street purposes.
and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said petition
on July 2nd, 1956 ,notices of which said public hearings
were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section
9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invest-
igation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due
consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
did adopt its Resolution No. 239 recommending to the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that Variance No. 586 be granted upon the
conditions stated in said resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the pro~erty in-
volved or to the intended use of the property that
do not apply generally to the property or class of
use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the pre-
servation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same vicinity
and zone and denied to the property in question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or in-
jurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not
adverselYJaffect the comprehensive general zoning plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
:~:e Ci;y h~;e~~~;;~t;~a~o a~~o~~i ~~~~;l~O~3~ }i~~~~~~e D~iye~~n~:1m,
California, , ,1lrmJdmB:.1!1_~~"!~"I.I~<T for the
following purposes: To cut two lote from the above described property
containing less than the minimum area required by the City of Anaheim,
Subject to the following conditions:
-1-
-
1. That sidewalks be installed in front of the lots.
f.........
2. That the owner of subject property pay into the Park and
Recreation Site Fund the sum of $25 per lot.
3. That the owner of subject property file with the City
of Anaheim and with the County of Orange a Record of
Survey Map covering said lots.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner
or their heirs, successors or assigns to comply with the Anaheim
Municipal Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said
variance is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Munici-
pal Code unless otherwise specified herein.
THE FOREGOING R=SOLUTION is signed and approved by me
this lu.th day of AUQust , 19 56
~~~
!{AYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
1T
/ /)~~ hi ?u~ ~ .a.~ --'Zj
CITY CLEP~ OF THE CITY OP ANAHEIM
.""0 Tilt"'"
3TATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) S8.
SITY OF ANAHEIM )
DENE M. WILLIAMS
I, ~"I~~~., City Clerk of the City of Ana-
heim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was intro-
duced and adopted at a reaular , meeting provided by
law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 14th
day of Auaust . 19 56 . by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEN: Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser.
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNCILMEN: Pearson
Pro Tem
And I further certify that the Mayor/or the City of Anaheim
approved and signed said resolution on the lu.th day of AUQust
, 19 ~6 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 14th day of
----...AIa.gJuL___ ___.____, 19_22..._.
/'
t ' ~-) 'J \J.'
.K.>';" 7'-"- /;Jf. /t.( ....u!~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
...-
-2-