11/13/2024ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 2024
The regular meeting of November 13, 2024 was called to order at 3:01 p.m. in the Council Chamber
of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and
related material were duly posted on November 7, 2024.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953, Subdivision (b), the regular meeting included
teleconference participation by Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Member Stephen Faessel from
Tampa Marriott Water Street, Meeting Room 3 (Second Floor), 505 Water Street, Tampa, FL 33602.
The Notice and Agenda were posted at the teleconference location. Public comments from the
teleconference location was allowed pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Norma Campos Kurtz and Council Members Jose Diaz,
Carlos A. Leon, and Natalie Meeks.
Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Member Stephen Faessel (via
teleconference).
Council Member Rubalcava joined the meeting during Closed Session.
STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and
City Clerk Theresa Bass
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Robert Fabela reported that Closed
Session Item No. 1 has been removed from the agenda and Item No. 3 relates to a potential
settlement with JW Marriott regarding a Transient Occupancy Tax dispute.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: No in -person speakers and no public
comments from the teleconference location. No electronic public comments were received related to
the Closed Session agenda.
CLOSED SESSION: At 3:02 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz recessed to Closed Session for
consideration of the following:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of
California Government Code Section 54956.9): One Potential Case
(A copy of the claim against the City is included in the agenda packet and available for review
by contacting the City Clerk's Office and on-line electronically with the agenda
at: )
Item No. 9 was withdrawn from the Closed Session agenda.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
(Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code)
Name of Case: Grandma's House of Hope v. City of Anaheim, et al, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 30-2022-01241823
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of
California Government Code Section 54956: One Potential Case
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 2 of 26
4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
(Section 54956.8 of the California Government Code)
Assessor Parcel Number: 234-121-25: 514-522 East Vermont Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92805
Agency Negotiators: Jim Vanderpool, City Manager, Rudy Emami, Director of Public Works
and Randy Saldana, Public Works Real Property Analyst
Negotiating Parties: City of Anaheim and Anaheim East Vermont, LLC
Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
At 5:00 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz reconvened the Anaheim City Council.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Pro Tem Norma Campos Kurtz and Council Members Jose Diaz,
Carlos A. Leon, Natalie Rubalcava, and Natalie Meeks.
Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Member Stephen Faessel (via
teleconference).
INVOCATION: Pastor Erica Flora, Eastside Christian Church
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Norma Campos Kurtz
PRESENTATION: Recognizing Oliver Cortez's Artwork throughout the City
Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz recognized Oliver Cortez's talent, vision, and artwork that have brought color,
inspiration, and a unique perspective to the City. She noted that he has been an integral part of the
City's art scene. She shared that he has used City landmarks, streets, parks, and public spaces as
inspiration, including a mural at Little People's Park in recognition of Chicano Heritage Month. She
noted that his work has established a deep sense of connection to the City and represents the City's
shared history, diverse culture, and collective identity. She recognized Mr. Cortez's aesthetic, social,
educational, and emotional impacts on the City.
Mr. Cortez thanked everyone in attendance for their support of his artwork. He thanked his family, his
girlfriend, his mother, and his sisters for their support. He expressed his passion for making a positive
impact in the community and motivating others to achieve success regardless of their background,
and inspiring the next generation.
ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS(To be presented at a later date):
Recognizing October 6 —12, 2024, as Code Enforcement Officers Appreciation
Week
Recognizing October 20 — 26, 2024, as National Friends of the Library Week
Bonne Stevens, Treasurer for the Friends of the Anaheim Public Library, accepted the recognition
and thanked the City Council. She shared that it is the 601h Anniversary of the group's incorporation.
She noted that the Friends of the Library have raised over $1.8 million for the Anaheim Public Library
system. She shared that they continue to raise funds, particularly through their book sales, which are
held every third Friday of each month. She noted that their next sale will be on November 15th. with
half-price DVDs and books for 25 cents, and children's books available for ten cents. She reported
that the funds raised will contribute to summer and winter reading programs, the Big Read, the
Heritage Center, and other projects. She shared that the Friends of the Library have donated toward
the newly renamed Friends Garden at the Central Library and are collecting donations toward the
Maker Center at the Haskett Library. She reported that Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz, Congressman Lou
Correa, and representatives from State Senator Tom Umberg and Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 3 of 26
Silva's offices attended their 60th Anniversary celebration. She noted that it is their pleasure to work
with the Library to keep the organization going for years to come.
Recognizing October 20 — 26, 2024, as Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention
Week
Recognizing November 14, 2024, as Law Enforcement Records and Support
Personnel Day
Chief of Police Rick Armendariz and Records and Support Personnel Staff accepted the recognition.
Chief Armendariz reported that during Law Enforcement Records and Support Personnel week, the
Department recognized an exceptional group of staff in the Records Bureau who operate behind the
scenes to manage and organize the Department's essential records. He shared that their hard work
and attention to detail are vital to the Department's functions. He reported that in 2023, the Records
Bureau processed over 36,000 police reports. He noted that their dedication makes the Police
Department stronger each day.
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: City Clerk Theresa Bass noted that for Consent
Calendar Item No. 12, Ordinance No. 6596 regarding the approval of the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement with Anaheim Real Estate Partners, LLC, a memo was distributed to City
Council from the City Attorney's Office to reflect that their office inserted previously omitted
information and deleted redundant Condition No. 87 included in Exhibit L of the Amended and
Restated Development Agreement. The insertions and correction to the Conditions of Approval were
part of the record of the public hearing and the action before Council includes replacing Exhibit B of
the Ordinance. The memorandum was distributed to Council as well as posted on the City's website
and made publicly available.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items, except Public Hearin, sPrior to receipt of public
comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of
translation services, and a brief decorum.
City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of 30 public comments were received electronically prior
to 1:00 p.m. related to City Council agenda items and matters within the jurisdiction of the Anaheim
City Council. [A final total of 30 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City
Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix.
Paul Hyek, addressing Item No. 13, requested that the City Council review the City of Ventura's e-
bike policy. He noted the dangers of a -bikes to handicapped individuals, their high rates of speed,
and that they are often operated by children as young as 13.
Mark Richard Daniels, addressing Item No. 13, highlighted the dangers of e-bikes. He shared that his
brother, who uses a wheelchair, has been struck several times by a -bikes or scooters. He explained
that the situation could escalate to the point where someone is seriously injured or even killed.
Cecil Jordan Corkern requested that the City Council review reports on Disney. He requested that
reports from the City's channel be provided to him for review. He mentioned he will be monitoring the
homeless situation and security.
Matthew Duncan shared his experience attending Anaheim public libraries as a child. He shared that
a librarian had gone above and beyond and expressed his appreciation for library staff. He continued
his comments from the previous meeting on the City's use of banned rodenticides. He highlighted
Rebecca Dmytryk with Humane Wildlife Control, who focuses on sanitation and rodent exclusion. He
shared that Ms. Dmytryk had contacted the City Council to offer her services.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 4 of 26
Marc Herbert complimented Council Member Rubalcava for reporting a discussion that took place at
the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) Transportation Committee meeting. He expressed
concern that staff on the Board did not alert the public to that conversation. He requested clarification
if the public is allowed to attend the meetings, after being informed that the public was not. He
emphasized the Committee's importance and oversight. He suggested a review of ATID's funding
and public participation at the meetings.
Mayor Aitken reported no public comments from the teleconference location.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Council Member Leon thanked everyone who joined him at 85 Degrees Bakery Cafe last month for
the Cafecito event in partnership with Assembly Member Valencia. He stated that it was a great
opportunity to connect with neighbors, discuss key issues in neighborhoods, and how to work
together to make positive changes in the community. He thanked the Brookhurst Jr. High School
Project S.A.Y. students for taking the time on a Saturday morning to get involved and engaged on
key issues that are important to them and the City. Council Member Leon highlighted and shared
photographs of events he attended including the Second Annual Trunk or Treat event at the Anaheim
Elementary Key Campus. He thanked all the community partners including the Anaheim Elementary
School District, the Brown Descents Car Club, Naranjeros Car Club, Anaheim Car Club, and
everyone who stopped by to make it such a fun event. He congratulated all the volunteers and City
staff for their efforts with the 100th Anniversary of the Halloween Parade. He congratulated Public
Works for their trophy. Council Member Leon recognized all the amazing Dia de Los Muertos events
that took place across the City with vibrant decorations and heart -felt alters. He attended celebrations
at Savanna High School, Peter Marshall Elementary, and the City's event at Center Greens. He also
recognized Veterans Day and all the veterans in the community who served in the military. He
thanked all veterans for their bravery, sacrifice, and strength to protect everyone's freedom. Council
Member Leon invited everyone to an upcoming Turkey Giveaway on Sunday, November 24 from
10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Brookhurst Community Center. He stated he was honored to continue
supporting Frank Garcia and his Thanksgiving tradition of giving thanks and giving back to the
community. He stated the event will not be the traditional Thanksgiving event at the Honda Center,
but in partnership with Frank Garcia, he will be distributing 200 turkeys to families in the community.
The drive-thru event will be first come, first served. Council Member Leon congratulated Mr. Z Noodle
House, the October Restaurant of the Month. Mr. Z Noodle House is a family -owned small business
that has been serving authentic Chinese flavors in District 2, located at Euclid Street and Crescent
Way. They serve tasty noodles, savory stir -fries, and fresh dim sum. He stated that their dedication to
traditional cooking shines through in every bite, and he encouraged everyone to support the
restaurant as they continue to grow in our community. Council Member Leon congratulated 1 Stop
Flooring Supply, the October Business of the Month. 1 Stop Flooring Supply has a location in
Anaheim off Euclid Street and Broadway and a location in the City of Artesia. They have been
providing top-notch flooring materials including hardwood, vinyl, and laminate. They have been in
business for over 20 years and Andy the manager at the Anaheim location, and his father started the
company even before he could speak English, showing how hard work and dedication can build
something great. Council Member Leon stated that it is immigrants like Andy's father who play a vital
role in the economy. He wished 1 Stop Flooring Supply continued success.
Council Member Rubalcava shared that she had the opportunity to speak to a class at Chapman
University on local politics and congratulated Mayor Pro Tern Campos Kurtz on the recent election.
Council Member Rubalcava stated that it was an honor to be able to speak to many students about
governing a local municipality and making budget decisions for public safety and other things like
that. She shared that K&A Cafe and Catering, a local small business in Anaheim, will be hosting their
annual Christmas Eve Community Brunch. Council Member Rubalcava stated that she will be
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 5 of 26
requesting assistance again this year from the Anaheim Police Department, Fire and Rescue, and
Anaheim Public Utilities. Approximately 800 individuals attended the event last year and received
toys for their families and were also treated to a complimentary brunch. The event will take place on
Christmas Eve, December 241h from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. on Center Street. She noted that toy
donations are being accepted at this time for kids of all ages including teens who are usually left out.
Toy donation boxes are located at K&A Cafe and wrapping paper donations are also being accepted.
Council Member Rubalcava noted that she attended Anaheim High School, Class of 1996, and she
congratulated the football team who is currently in the CIF playoffs. They are playing this Friday, and
she stated she is sending them fierce vibes for a win on Friday. Council Member Rubalcava stated
that the Veterans Day event honoring many veterans in the City, including some Public Works
employees who are also veterans, was held in District 3. Council Member Rubalcava requested
adjourning the meeting in memory of Jacob Anthony Maldonado. Jake was born on January 23,
2002, and he passed away on August 13, 2024. He was a talented logistics specialist, admired by his
colleagues for his dedication and work ethic. Outside of his professional life, he had a deep passion
for basketball and music. He enjoyed playing basketball and was a devoted fan. She stated that he
also loved the Dodgers, and although she is an Angels fan, she congratulated the Dodgers on their
recent World Series win. Jacob is also remembered, not only for his skills on the court and his
musical taste, but also for his infectious sense of humor and quick wit. Jake had a unique ability to
bring joy to those around him, making every moment brighter. He is survived by his loving parents,
her brother and sister-in-law, and his siblings Regina, Steven, and Jada. His presence will be deeply
missed.
Mayor Aitken shared that she and Council Member Faessel had no Council Communications to
report.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz highlighted and shared photographs of events she attended including two
Halloween celebrations. She thanked Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento for donating hundreds of
pumpkins to the Ponderosa Family Resource Center. Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz along with Mayor Aitken
and Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento distributed the pumpkins to very excited families. She also
thanked Community Services for their assistance. Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz also distributed pumpkins at
the Golden Skies Mobile Home Park. She thanked Bharat Patel from Castle Inn & Suites and Tina
Riley from Wincome Hospitality who helped make that possible. She attended the Friends of the
Anaheim Public Library event and highlighted the importance of their work in raising funds for books
for the Mobile Family Resource Center. Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz attended the Veterans Day celebration
and expressed pride in her husband, a Vietnam War veteran, and the overall success of the Veterans
Day celebration.
CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE: None
CONSENT CALENDAR: At 5:46 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Council
Member Leon pulling Item No. 2 and Council Member Meeks pulling Item No. 13 for separate
discussion and consideration.
MOTION: Council Member Leon moved to waive reading of all ordinances and resolutions and adopt
the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and
recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL
CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel,
and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried.
B105 1. Receive and file minutes of the Public Utilities Board meetings of August 28, 2024 and
September 25, 2024.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 6 of 26
D128 3. Approve the 2025 Investment Policy for the City of Anaheim.
D128 4. Approve carryover expenditure appropriations of $120,540,934 from Fiscal Year 2023124 to
Fiscal Year 2024/25 for projects previously approved by the City Council but not completed.
5. Determine, on the basis of the evidence submitted by Good Hope International, that the
AGR-10188.1 property owner has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of Development
Agreement No. 2016-00001 for the 2024 review period for the eight -story, 580-room hotel
project located at 1700 South Harbor Boulevard in The Anaheim Resort.
6.
Approve the agreement with Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd, dba NCE, in the amount of
AGR-15107
$532,840 inclusive of a 10% contingency for as -needed extra work for the completion of
services, for engineering services to provide the Citywide Pavement Management Plan
Update for the Arterial Highway System and Local Street System from Fiscal Year 2025 to
Fiscal Year 2029; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the
agreement and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and
administer the agreement.
7.
Approve a Master Agreement with eight contractors and such other pre -qualified contractors
AGR-15108
as may be pre -qualified by the City during the term of the Master Agreement, each in an
AGR-15109
amount not to exceed $1,000,000 per work order package or request for emergency response
AGR-15110
services, for park facility maintenance, demolition, repair, replacement and emergency
AGR-15111
response services each for a five year period with up to two two-year optional extensions;
AGR-15112
authorize the Director of Community Services, or designee, to execute the agreements and to
AGR-15113
take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreements, including any
AGR-15114
extensions; determine that the projects to be performed under the Master Agreement shall be
AGR-15115
categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Sections 15301, 15302,
15303, and/or 15304 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize de
minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Master
Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney's Office [Academy Electric, Inc.; Carmody
Construction Company; Evolution Landscaping, Inc.; PALP, Inc. dba Excel Paving Company;
Hardy & Harper, Inc.; Leighton Consulting, Inc.; New Dimension General Construction, Inc.;
and RAMCO General Engineering Contractors, Inc.].
8.
Approve the Renewable Power Purchase and Sale Agreement with Energy Development &
AGR-15116
Construction Corporation, dba EDCC, by which EDCC will own, operate, and maintain a wind
farm generating facility (Project) and sell to the City all Project -generated energy and
renewable attributes including a right of first refusal to all of the Project's future potential
products, at an approximate annual cost of $1,800,000 during the initial term, which may be
increased once at any time by up to 17% if EDCC elects to repower the Project to expand its
generating capacity, for an initial term of ten years with up to two ten-year optional extensions;
authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the Agreement and
any associated documents; execute any amendments or restatements to the Agreement,
including the optional term extensions, that are cost-neutral/reducing or would involve only
minor administrative cost increases; execute any documents needed to carry out the
transaction as contemplated by the Agreement, such as collateral assignment agreements,
power scheduling agreements, and scheduling coordinator agreements; and to take the
necessary actions to implement and administer the Agreement.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 7 of 26
9. Approve the Grace Orchard Solar Project Power Sales Agreement with Southern California
AGR-15117 Public Power Authority (SCPPA) by which SCPPA will sell to the City energy and associated
renewable attributes generated by the Grace Solar Project, at an annual cost not to exceed
$13,300,000, for a twenty year term; authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or
designees, to execute the Agreement and associated documents; execute any amendments
or restatements to the Agreement that are cost-neutral/reducing or would involve only minor
administrative cost increases; execute any documents needed to carry out the transaction as
contemplated by the Agreement; and to take the necessary actions to implement and
administer the Agreement.
10. Approve a First Amendment to Allocation Agreement Resettlement of Injunctive Claims with
AGR-9987.1 Anaheim Arena Management, LLC (AAM), increasing the final reimbursable amount payable
to AAM by approximately $139,000, from $1,300,000 to $1,439,000, for work performed by
AAM related to the completion of certain architectural remedial work at the Honda Center
pursuant to the previously authorized settlement of lawsuits filed under the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990; and authorize the Executive Director of the Convention, Sports &
Entertainment Department to execute the amended agreement and to take the necessary
actions to implement the agreement.
M142 11. ORDINANCE NO. 6594 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM amending Section 1.04.310 and adding Section 1.04.312 of Chapter 1.04 of Title
of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to the procurement of certain equipment, materials,
supplies and services for the Public Utilities Department to address emergency repairs,
operations, maintenance, and construction of electric and water utility infrastructure [up to
$3,000,000 per procurement award; introduced at the Council meeting of October 29, 2024,
Item No. 26].
Determine that the ordinance relates to organizational or administrative activities of
governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and
therefore is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378(b).
12. ORDINANCE NO. _ 6595 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
AGR-13774.A ANAHEIM amending Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) and
C430 Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (DEV2023-00050) [Amendment No.1 to the OCVIBE Master Site Plan; introduced at the
Council meeting of October 29, 2024, Public Hearing Item No. 30].
ORDINANCE NO. 6596 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting the Amended and Restated
Development Agreement No. 2020-00004 by and between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim
Real Estate Partners, LLC and making certain findings related thereto (DEV2023-00050)
[Amendment No.1 to the OCVIBE Master Site Plan; introduced at the Council meeting of
October 29, 2024, Public Hearing Item No. 30].
Ordinance No. 6596 includes inserted previously omitted information and deleted redundant
Condition No. 87 included in Exhibit L of the Amended and Restated Development Agreement
and replacement of Exhibit 8 of the Ordinance.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 8 of 26
M142 14. Receive and file the Anaheim Police Department's Annual (2023) Military Equipment Report.
ORDINANCE NO. 6598 _ (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM renewing, with modifications, Ordinance No. 6561 approving the Anaheim Police
Department's Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy 705) pursuant to California Government
Code Section 7071
M142 15. ORDINANCE NO. 6599 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM amending Section 13.08.020 of Chapter 13.08 of Title 13 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (Public Parks - Prohibited Conduct Generally) [includes determination that ordinance is
not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections
15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result in a direct or
reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment as there is no possibility it
will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a " project', as defined in Section
15378 of State CEQA Guidelines].
BUSINESS CALENDAR:
D116 2. Approve recognitions recognizing Mike Rubin's retirement as a Board Member with the
Anaheim Community Foundation; 2024 Anaheim Tech Scholar Recipients; Anaheim Fall
Festival Committee's efforts in the 100th Anniversary of the Fall Festival; the 50th Anniversary
of West Anaheim Girl Scout Troop 3702; and the 40th Anniversary of GBS Linens.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Leon requested to update the recognition for the Anaheim Fall
Festival Committee to include the City Departments that participated in the parade.
MOTION: Council Member Leon moved to approve recognitions recognizing Mike Rubin's retirement
as a Board Member with the Anaheim Community Foundation; 2024 Anaheim Tech Scholar
Recipients; and Anaheim Fall Festival Committee's and the City's efforts in the 100th Anniversary of
the Fall Festival; the 50th Anniversary of West Anaheim Girl Scout Troop 3702; and the 40th
Anniversary of GBS Linens, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7
(Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel, and Meeks); NOES — 0.
Motion carried.
M142 13. ORDINANCE NO. 6597 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adding Chapter 14.72 to Title 14 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code regarding the operation of motorized wheeled conveyances in the City of
Anaheim [including E-Bike regulations].
DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks highlighted the importance of establishing rules for E-Bikes to
educate users to address current issues.
In response to Council Member Meeks, Chief of Police Rick Armendariz defined public pathways as
streets, roads, highways, bicycle paths, and bicycle lanes.
Council Member Meeks inquired if that includes a multi -use trail for bicycles and pedestrians. Chief
Armendariz reported that those trails fall into a different category for paved trails, which have a 10-
mile-per-hour limitation.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 9 of 26
Council Member Meeks referenced the exception for motorized tricycles and quadricycles necessary
for mobility -challenged people. She expressed concern that a speed limit was not proposed for those
vehicles. She requested additional information on the regulations and guidelines that govern those
conveyances. Chief Armendariz explained that the intent of the exemption was for individuals with
limited mobility who need assistance.
Officer Tyler Raabe explained that the maximum speed for electric wheelchairs is five to ten miles per
hour for individuals to move around. He added that the intent was for safety and to allow individuals
to use wheelchairs and not the typical motorized conveyances.
Council Member Meeks inquired if Park Rangers can enforce the regulations in parks and on trails.
Chief Armendariz reported that sworn officers typically enforce the regulations.
Director of Community Services Sjany Larson -Cash explained that Park Rangers can advise, but they
do not have enforcement capabilities. She noted that challenges include individuals driving away from
Park Rangers. She shared that Park Rangers advise anyone riding motorized conveyances in the
parks.
In response to Council Member Meeks, Director Larson -Cash confirmed that staff can work with the
Police Department to enforce the regulations for immediate needs. She shared that staff can work
with the Community Policing Team for any recurring issues.
Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for bringing the ordinance forward. She inquired if the
proposed ordinance was modeled after other cities. Chief Armendariz reported that staff evaluated
the 34 Orange County cities, OC Parks, and the County for unincorporated areas.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz stated that no cities in Orange County
require a license to operate because the State does not require one.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz reported that E-Bike complaints have
been increasing. He shared that between 2019 and 2022, E-Bike sales increased by 269%, with an
average of one million E-Bikes sold each year. He noted that E-Bike accidents have increased from
2019 to 2023, with increases each year.
Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on the recent approval of a School
Resource Officer at El Rancho Charter School, in response to E-Bike complaints. Chief Armendariz
shared that an additional officer was requested in response to community concerns. He reported that
a staff member at El Rancho had mentioned that a majority of the youth involved with E-Bike
violations are students from the school.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Armendariz explained that the APD's Traffic Unit
continues to educate patrol officers on current and future laws. He noted that the School Resource
Officers will continue to receive education and provide education to school staff, students, and
parents. He explained that when dealing with traffic concerns, APD focuses on education,
enforcement, and engineering.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed her support for the ordinance. She requested the
implementation of stronger laws around how youth are utilizing E-Bikes or requiring a license to go
over a certain speed limit.
Council Member Faessel inquired if all trails, including ones that are not paved, would be covered
under the proposed ordinance. Chief Armendariz explained that the proposed ordinance defines
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 10 of 26
unsafe operations as operating on unpaved trails meant for hiking, equestrian use, or walking. He
clarified that E-Bikes would be prohibited on unpaved trails.
Council Member Diaz expressed his support for the ordinance.
MOTION: Council Member Diaz moved to introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6597
(INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adding
Chapter 14.72 to Title 14 of the Anaheim Municipal Code regarding the operation of motorized
wheeled conveyances in the City of Anaheim [including E-Bike regulations], seconded by Council
Member Meeks.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava inquired if there will be comprehensive outreach to the
community regarding the ordinance.
Chief Communications Officer Mike Lyster commended the APD for educating the public on the
different types of vehicles and regulations that apply to them. He shared that the Communications
Team can partner with the APD to provide outreach to the community.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz requested that motorized scooters be included as part of the communications
to the community.
MOTION: Council Member Diaz moved to introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6597
(INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adding
Chapter 14.72 to Title 14 of the Anaheim Municipal Code regarding the operation of motorized
wheeled conveyances in the City of Anaheim [including E-Bike regulations], seconded by Council
Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz,
Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. Ordinance introduced.
D112 16. ORDINANCE NO. (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM adding Section 1.11.085 (Gift Restrictions), to Chapter 1.11 (Sunshine Provisions)
of Title 1 (Administration) of the Anaheim Municipal Code [Prohibiting gifts from restricted
resources over fifty dollars ($50)].
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Artin Berjikly reported that at the October 8, 2024 City Council
meeting, the City Council directed the City Attorney's Office to bring back for the Council's
consideration an ordinance that would strengthen the City's laws with respect to the acceptance of
gifts from restricted sources to ensure that Anaheim's City officials that file Statements of Economic
Interest (Form 700's) cannot accept gifts above fifty dollars ($50) from these sources in a calendar
year. He explained that restricted sources include lobbyists or a person who is conducting business
before the City in one of many ways. He shared that the proposed ordinance adds Section 1.11.085
to the Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC).
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly summarized concepts included in the proposed
ordinance, which defines a gift as any payment that confers a personal benefit upon a recipient,
including monetary goods or services. He reported that the State allows for receipt of gifts up to $590
from reportable sources. He explained that under the proposed ordinance, the City would allow for
Form 700 filers to accept gifts up to $50 from certain restricted sources. He clarified that all other
reportable sources would remain at the $590 State limit.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly defined restricted sources as a person seeking a City
contract within the past 12 months, or currently under contract with the City, and for 12 months after
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 11 of 26
the contract has ended; a person seeking a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, or having
sought one in the past 12 months and for 12 months thereafter; registered lobbyists or those requiring
to be registered under City law; and any person lobbying, influencing or advocating the City that
would have a personal financial impact over the past 12 months or 12 months thereafter. He clarified
that the restricted sources represent two groups: registered lobbyists or those required to be
registered, or those having business before the City.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly reported that under the proposed ordinance, there
should be no solicitation of a gift from a restricted source by a City official. He added that City officials
should not accept gifts of more than $50 in a calendar year from any restricted source and should not
accept gifts from an unknown source. He explained that the unknown source would be when a City
official does not know where the gift is coming from. He added that a City official would be required to
make a reasonable effort to determine whether a gift giver is a restricted source. He reported that for
the gift giver, there should be no intentional or knowing gift giving to a City official, and a gift giver
should make a reasonable effort to inform a City official if they are a restricted source.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly reported that enforcement would have an emphasis on
compliance with the chance to correct a violation within the State's 30-day period. He explained that
California allows for a 30-day cure period to return the gift, pay for the gift, or donate the gift to
charity. He noted that the City would mirror the State's 30-day cure period to allow for compliance and
not to punish the City official or gift giver. He shared that the law is specific about how the issues can
occur. He explained that if there is intentional or knowing behavior by a City official or a gift giver, or if
a gift is not cured by one of the processes, penalties include personnel discipline, censure,
admonishment, termination of employment, or an infraction.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly reported that staff focused on detailing the definitions
section, particularly restricted sources and prohibitions. He shared that Section 1.11.085.030 would
outline violations and enforcement. He emphasized that the goal of the ordinance is compliance and
curing, and not seeking punishment against a City official or gift giver. He stated that the restricted
sources would be individuals with the most potential for influence upon a City official. He added that
gifts from nonrestricted sources can still be made up to the $590 State level. He explained that the
proposed ordinance is a local restriction designed to lower the State's current limit. He reported that
by using the word restricted, staff are not implying that a gift is not allowed. He explained that the
implication is that a gift from a restricted source may be made only when it does not exceed $50. He
added that gift exceptions, such as gifts provided to the City in limited circumstances or under the
Ticket Policy guidelines, or other State exceptions, would still be applicable under the proposed
ordinance. He expressed his support for the item.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Faessel expressed support for a control on gifts and his support for
hiring an Ethics Officer. He explained that the $50 limit will be difficult for officials to manage and
suggested that the limit be increased to $100. He reported that officials attend various receptions
where food is served, and trying to determine what is valued at $50 would be difficult. He explained
that because officials are required to file Form 700s for anything over $50, the $100 limit would be
reasonable.
Council Member Leon expressed his support for the item and expressed appreciation for the Ethics
Officer and City Attorney for their work on the proposed ordinance, and Council Member Diaz for his
input. He explained that the ordinance is crucial to preserve the integrity of public office and maintain
the trust of the community. He added that moving forward will provide clarity, reinforce the City's
commitment to ethical governance, and provide transparency to the community. He shared that the
proposed ordinance creates clear boundaries for elected officials and City officials to remove any
uncertainty about what is acceptable. He explained that the clarity protects officials from any ethical
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 12 of 26
dilemmas, potential legal issues, and creates a straightforward standard to follow and simplifies
compliance. He addressed Council Member Faessel's suggestion to raise the limit to $100; he
expressed his interest in maintaining the $50 limit but requested additional advice from the Ethics
Officer. He shared that the $50 limit adds clarity, and anything under $50 does not have to be
reported per State law.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that the $50 limit was established as a
median point between what other jurisdictions have established. He shared that the limit would avoid
confusion due to the State's requirement to report anything over $50 on a Form 700.
In reference to Council Member Faessel's comments, City Attorney Robert Fabela requested
clarification from Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly on how the Fair Political Practices
Commission (FPPC) would value food for non -ticketed events or conferences.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that for ticketed events, the value would be
what is included on a ticket or pass. He reported that for invitation -only events, the value would be
determined by adding up the cost of food, drinks, and entertainment at the event, and dividing by the
number of attendees. He shared that if the gift is from a restricted source, under the proposed
ordinance, if the value exceeds $50, it would be prohibited unless the official paid for the event at or
below $50. He explained that an exception would be for nonprofit fundraisers, which are not
considered gifts.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained
that elected officials are at the highest disclosure level for gifts.
Council Member Rubalcava requested additional clarification on reporting for various Form 700s.
Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that future discussions can be held to clarify rules or restrictions.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed her support for the ordinance.
Council Member Diaz expressed his support for the ordinance. He explained that the proposed
ordinance communicates to lobbyists and people doing business with the City to refrain from
providing gifts to City officials. He noted that the provision for gifts received 12 months prior to and 12
months after is similar to the Levine Act.
Mayor Aitken expressed her support for the ordinance. She explained that the City is seeking
transparency and trying to provide good service to the people of Anaheim. She thanked Council
Member Leon and Council Member Diaz for their work on the ordinance.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz, Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that gift
laws are evaluated case by case. He noted that the State provides exceptions, but within those
exceptions, they are case by case. He shared that if gifts are passed through or distributed to other
people, it would not qualify as a gift.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz requested clarification on whether an entrance fee for a parade would be
considered a gift.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that it would fall under a ceremonial role,
which is an exception by the State.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 13 of 26
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz, Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that the
gift is related to a particular instance. He clarified that if a gift is from the same source, the amount
accumulates for a calendar year.
Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz inquired if the proposed ordinance would apply to labor union events.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly clarified it would depend on what the event is and what
the official's role is. He explained that if it is for a ceremonial role or fundraiser, it would not apply. He
added that generally, if it does not fall under those exceptions, it would be considered a gift.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz, Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly clarified that a
non-profit would be considered a 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(6).
Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz requested that the restriction be placed on lobbyists to inform officials on the
value of attending an event before an invitation is accepted.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that the 30-day cure period is included for
officials to make a determination on whether they decide to pay the value in full or pay the value
down. He explained that determining the value before the event would place more of a responsibility
on the City official and gift provider in determining a value as soon as possible.
Council Member Rubalcava inquired if behested payments are included. She provided an example of
requesting a business to support an event she is holding, and if that would be considered a gift.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly confirmed that it would generally be considered a gift.
Council Member Rubalcava requested additional review of the inclusion of behested payments. And
requested that the $50 limit not apply to events where officials work with non -profits. She suggested
additional training and clarification on behested payments.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly confirmed additional training could be provided. He
explained that the full intention is to inform and educate the public.
Council Member Rubalcava explained that labor unions are not defined as lobbyists under the City's
lobbying ordinance. She requested additional information on how they apply to the proposed
ordinance.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly explained that a lobbyist would be a restricted source
and apply to gifts and not campaign contributions. He explained that the proposed ordinance is to
limit gifts from certain individuals to limit the potential for undue influence.
Council Member Rubalcava suggested an exclusion for behested payments because they are
already included in State law.
Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly shared that staff can use the same definition for a gift as
the State, which would include exceptions. He explained that the proposed ordinance is evaluating
gifts that do not fall under any State exception or exemption or are from restricted sources.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Assistant City Attorney/Ethics Officer Berjikly confirmed
that the language for behested payments can be included in the ordinance.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 14 of 26
Council Member Faessel suggested that the item be continued to address concerns raised by
Council Members.
MOTION: Council Member Faessel moved to continue the item.
DISCUSSION: City Attorney Fabela clarified that the request would be to continue the item.
MOTION: Council Member Faessel moved to continue the item, seconded by Mayor Aitken.
DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Faessel, City Attorney Fabela added that the
continuance can be for a future meeting and not a date certain.
Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz expressed concern about the behested payments. She expressed her interest
in continuing to work with businesses to hold various events and programs.
City Attorney Fabela requested clarification on whether the continuance would be to a date certain or
a date that can be decided at a later point.
Council Member Faessel clarified that the item can be continued to a date to be determined once
there are answers to the questions raised.
Council Member Leon expressed concern about postponing the item. He mentioned that starting
January 1, the City Council will have new reporting requirements in place and potential new members
of the City Council. He requested an amendment to continue the item to the next City Council
meeting.
Council Member Faessel expressed concern that there would not be enough time to address the
concerns raised for the next meeting.
Council Member Rubalcava agreed with Council Member Leon's concerns and suggested that the
committee working on the ordinance meet to discuss the concerns.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the City Council agenda for the November 19, 2024 meeting will
be posted the following day. He explained that if Council Members Diaz and Leon have spoken to a
third member about the topic that is not Council Member Rubalcava, it would prevent Council
Member Rubalcava from participating at a future date.
Council Member Faessel suggested that the item be addressed before the end of the year.
City Attorney Fabela explained that the motion will be interpreted as a continuance to a future
meeting with no set date.
Mayor Aitken echoed Council Member Faessel's comments. She explained that the rules will affect
new members of the City Council who may want to provide input on the item.
Council Member Leon requested to bring the item forward at the December 10th meeting. Council
Member Faessel suggested taking a vote on the current motion.
City Clerk Bass explained that the December 1011 meeting will include an item to certify the results of
the election. She explained that the November 19th meeting will be adjourned to 3 p.m. on December
10th to certify the results, and at 5 p.m., the Oath Ceremony will be held at The River Arena.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 15 of 26
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz, City Clerk Bass reported that the next meeting following
December 10th will be December 171h and will include the newly elected Council Members. She
explained that the second reading for the ordinance could be agendized for the first meeting in
January and the ordinance would become effective 30 days from that date.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed her support for the ordinance. She explained that she
requested additional clarification on the behest of payment. She explained that she will not be
supporting a continuance. She suggested that the City Council support the introduction of the
ordinance with the added clarification.
Council Member Diaz acknowledged the Mayor's comments on receiving the new Council Members'
input. He explained that he and Council Member Leon have worked on the ordinance and made it
simple to follow.
In response to Council Member Diaz, City Attorney Fabela confirmed that a vote is required for the
action.
Council Member Diaz shared that the item can be voted upon and introduced and then Council
Members can ask additional questions at the next meeting.
Council Member Meeks explained that she will support a continuance to address the questions
raised. She requested additional clarification on how the gift value for events is determined before
moving forward with the item.
Council Member Leon expressed his appreciation for his colleagues and their input. He explained
that the purpose of the item is to take a step towards a government built on transparency,
accountability, and public trust. He echoed Council Member Diaz's comments that the item is
intended to provide clarity and a standard beyond the State's requirements. He added that the item is
intended to remove any potential influence from restricted sources, lobbyists, those required to
register as lobbyists, and those who have business before the City. He explained that the intent is to
set a high ethical standard and reassure the community that decisions are made transparently and in
the best interests of the community. He added that there will be endless scenarios and hypotheticals.
He explained that the Ethics Officer and City Attorney are available to answer questions at any time
without having to wait until an issue is brought up. He requested to introduce the ordinance.
City Attorney Fabela explained that substitute motions are not allowed under the City's Rules of
Order. He explained that to continue, Council Member Faessel would need to withdraw his motion
that is on the table or vote on the current motion and make another motion at that time.
Council Member Faessel requested to withdraw the question.
City Attorney Fabela explained that it requires a two-thirds vote, however, he explained that if there
are no objections, the Mayor Pro Tern can call the question.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz, City Attorney Fabela clarified that the question can be called
without objection from the Council.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Attorney Fabela explained that a 'no' vote would not
support the continuance.
In response to Council Member Leon, City Attorney Fabela clarified that a motion on the floor cannot
be replaced with another motion according to the City of Anaheim's Rules of Order.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 16 of 26
In response to Council Member Leon, City Attorney Fabela clarified that the City Council may have
previously proposed friendly amendments but not substitute motions.
In response to Council Member Faessel, City Attorney Fabela explained that if Council Member
Faessel were to withdraw his motion, the motion on the floor would be to introduce the ordinance.
City Attorney Fabela clarified that the current motion is to continue the item to a future date.
MOTION: Council Member Faessel moved to continue the item to a future meeting date, seconded by
Mayor Aitken. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 4 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Faessel,
and Meeks); NOES — 3 (Council Members Diaz, Leon, and Rubalcava). Motion carried.
D116 17. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM requesting the State of California take action to mitigate the impacts of
Senate Bill 357 [SB 357 — "Safer Streets For All Act"].
Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia reported that the item is for consideration of a resolution that
requests the State to help mitigate the impacts of Senate Bill (SB) 357. He explained that at the
October 29, 2024, City Council meeting, Council Member Diaz requested a resolution urging the
State of California to take action to mitigate the impacts of Senate Bill 357, also known as the "Safer
Streets for All Act" (SB 357). He shared that SB 357 took effect in 2023 and repealed a law that
criminalizes loitering with the intent to engage in sex work. He explained that the intent of the law was
to prevent discrimination and reduce harassment in public spaces. He reported that there have been
significant concerns over the broader implications for cities like Anaheim, where prostitution and
human trafficking have had a measurable impact on residents' quality of life, public health, and local
businesses.
Assistant City Manager Garcia reported that since SB 357 took effect, there has been an increase in
visible prostitution in the area, especially in West Anaheim, and the law has hampered law
enforcement's ability to prevent prostitution activity occurring on the streets and to initiate human
trafficking investigations. He added that while SB 357 addresses critical issues related to the
criminalization of vulnerable populations, the State should take additional steps to mitigate the
potential impacts of this law on local jurisdictions like Anaheim. He explained that if approved, the City
would transmit the proposed resolution to the State's delegation in Sacramento.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Diaz explained that SB 357 legalized the solicitation of prostitution.
He shared that SB 357 directly impacts the City's efforts to clean up Beach Boulevard and restricts
the Police Department's ability to address human trafficking. He added that the law contradicts itself
by legalizing the solicitation of prostitution while maintaining that prostitution is illegal. He explained
that the community would like to remain safe. He urged his Council colleagues to support the
resolution. He explained that criminals need to be responsible for their actions and there need to be
consequences for breaking the law.
MOTION: Council Member Diaz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-115 A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM requesting the State of
California take action to mitigate the impacts of Senate Bill 357 [SB 357 — "Safer Streets For All Act"],
seconded by Council Member Rubalcava.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 17 of 26
DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks thanked Council Member Diaz for bringing the item forward.
She explained that the intent is for public safety and to protect the women being trafficked. She
added that SB 357 was intended to protect vulnerable populations, however, it does not allow law
enforcement to help victims of human trafficking. She expressed her support for the item.
Mayor Aitken echoed her Council colleagues' comments.
Council Member Faessel concurred.
Council Member Leon thanked Council Member Diaz for his work and advocacy, especially regarding
Beach Boulevard and West Anaheim. He expressed his support for the item.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz thanked Council Member Diaz for bringing the item forward.
MOTION: Council Member Diaz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-115 _ A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM requesting the State of
California take action to mitigate the impacts of Senate Bill 357 [SB 357 — "Safer Streets For All Act"],
seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council
Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried.
18. RESOLUTION NO. 2024-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
AGR-1490.V CITY OF ANAHEIM, authorizing the execution and delivery of a schedule to the Master
AGR-15118 Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement for the acquisition, financing and leasing of certain
equipment for the public benefit within the terms provided herein; authorizing the execution
and delivery of other documents required in connection therewith; and authorizing all other
actions necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Resolution
[for three emergency transport ambulances and various equipment for a total principal amount
not to exceed $1,500,000].
Approve Contract Number MA#106-498218 with Republic EVS LLC., in an amount not to
exceed $688,088.59, for the purchase of three (3) Emergency Transport Ambulances.
Director of Finance Debbie Moreno reported that the item before Council is to seek approval for the
purchase of three ambulances through the City's Master Lease with Banc of America. She explained
that in July 2020, the City Council approved the transition to an Anaheim Emergency Transportation
Model. She noted that under the model, ambulance services previously provided by CARE
Ambulance were replaced with in-house ambulance services. She reported that overtime and with
the added demands placed on safety personnel to help address the complexities around
homelessness, the need for additional ambulances has become necessary to maintain transportation
coverage and response time standards. She explained that there is an immediate need for three (3)
ambulances at a cost of $700,000. She explained that Fire Operations would be poised to take
advantage of the remaining funds of approximately $800,000. She added that should the need arise
for additional equipment throughout the year, the City Council would have to approve. She reported
that the approximate annual payments for the three ambulances are approximately $150,000 over the
next five years at an interest rate of 4% per year.
Council Member Faessel and Mayor Aitken confirmed they did not have comments on the item.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 18 of 26
MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-116 A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, authorizing the execution and
delivery of a schedule to the Master Equipment Lease/Purchase Agreement for the acquisition,
financing and leasing of certain equipment for the public benefit within the terms provided herein;
authorizing the execution and delivery of other documents required in connection therewith; and
authorizing all other actions necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Resolution [for three emergency transport ambulances and various equipment for a total principal
amount not to exceed $1,500,000] and approve Contract Number MA#106-498218 with Republic
EVS LLC., in an amount not to exceed $688,088.59, for the purchase of three (3) Emergency
Transport Ambulances, seconded by Council Member Diaz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor
Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion
carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
C350 19. INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) AND
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN NO. 391
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO.2023-00042 (DEV2023-000421
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 19290
OWNER: Lumberyard Was Here, LLC, 709 Randolph Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626
APPLICANT: MLC HOLDINGS, LLC (Meritage Homes), 5 Peters Canyon Road Suite 310,
Irvine, CA 92606
PROJECT LOCATION: The approximately 2.05-acre site consists of two properties located at
275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street at the northwest and northeast corners of Philadelphia
Street and Santa Ana Street.
REQUEST: The applicant requests to construct a new residential development consisting of
56 for -sale 3-story condominium townhomes. Ten percent of the units would be for moderate -
income buyers. The project requires the following entitlements: (i) a General Plan Amendment
to change the land use designation of the project site from Low Medium Density Residential to
Medium Density Residential and (ii) a Tentative Tract Map to create a one -lot condominium
map to construct 56 townhomes.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will determine whether to approve
and adopt the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Plan No. 391 as the appropriate environmental documentation for the project.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Recommended City Council approval
of the project and approved Resolution Nos. PC2024-025 (Recommended City Council
approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 391
for the project), PC2024-026 (Recommended City Council approve and adopt proposed
General Plan Land Use Element Amendment), and PC2024-027 (Approved Tentative Tract
Map No. 19290, as amended with a new Condition No. 3, subsequent renumbering thereafter,
and revisions to Condition No. 44 renumbered as No. 45). VOTE: 7-0 (Chairperson Walker
and Commissioners Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, Perez, Tran-Martin, and Kring voted yes).
(Planning Commission meeting of September 23, 2024).
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 391 for Development Application No. 2023-00042 (275 and 301 East
Santa Ana Street).
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 19 of 26
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan of the City of Anaheim (DEV2023-00042)
(275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street).
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19290 and making certain findings in
connection therewith (DEV2023-00042) (275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street).
Acting Director of Planning and Building Heather Allen reported that the item for consideration is
approval of a development application for The Mill, a request to construct a new residential townhome
development and associated improvements. She explained that the property is approximately 2 acres
in size and is located at the northeast and northwest corners of Santa Ana Street and Philadelphia
Street. She added that Philadelphia Street divides the middle of the project area, creating two
separate blocks. She shared that the project site is in the Industrial Zone, the Residential Opportunity
(RO) Overlay Zone, and the South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor Overlay Zone. She reported that the
site is designated for Low Medium Density Residential land uses in the General Plan. She explained
that the proposed project, the RO Overlay Zone, is the applicable zoning classification on the
property.
Acting Director Allen reported that the request includes a General Plan Amendment to change the
land use designation of the project site from Low Medium Density Residential to Medium Density
Residential, a Tentative Tract Map to create a one -lot condominium map, and an Initial
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program to serve as the
environmental documents for the request. She shared that the project site was formerly used as a
lumber yard and mill and is entirely paved or covered by structures that are remnants of the previous
lumber yard use. She reported that the surrounding land uses include single-family and multi -family
residential uses to the north, Industrial uses across Santa Ana Street to the south, Single-family and
multi -family residential uses across Olive Street to the east, and Commercial and retail uses,
including the Packing House, across Claudina Street to the west.
Acting Director Allen reported that the applicant proposes a complete redevelopment of the site,
demolishing existing buildings to construct 56 new, for -sale, three-story townhomes ranging in size
from about 1,200 to 1,800 square feet, with 24 two -bedroom and 32 three -bedroom units. She noted
that the proposed density is 27.3 dwelling units per acre, well within the 36-unit per acre limit set by
the Medium Density Residential land use designation. She added that six units, or 10% of the total,
are designated as affordable, priced for moderate -income households. She reported that vehicular
access is provided by four driveways along the alley to the north, while internal private motor courts
with decorative pavers allow two-way access to residences and garages. She noted that pedestrian
movement is facilitated by internal walkways and sidewalks along the street frontages.
Acting Director Allen reported that recreational -leisure amenities include private patios, common
amenity areas, and various landscaping elements. She noted that two central open space courtyard
areas that open to East Santa Ana Street would include passive recreational amenities such as
seating areas, barbecues, open lawns for lawn games, and fireplaces for residents to gather and
socialize. She shared that the existing parkway landscaping and mature trees along East Santa Ana
Street would remain and the front setback area along East Santa Ana Street would include various
landscape elements as well as decorative walls and public art. She explained that new sidewalks and
parkways with new street trees would be installed along the other three public streets to provide
shade and promote a comfortable, attractive walking environment.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 20 of 26
Acting Director Allen reported that the architectural styles blend both modern and traditional design
features and materials. She added that the project complies with the Multiple Family Residential Zone
(RM-4) development standards. She noted that to physically accommodate the number of units
proposed by the project, waivers are requested to reduce the minimum street setback from 15 feet to
7 feet for Santa Ana Street, 11 feet for Claudina Street, Philadelphia Street, and Olive Street, and 5
feet for the alley.
Acting Director Allen reported that the provision of the 10% moderate -income units also qualifies the
project for reduced parking ratios of 1.5 parking spaces per unit requirement. She added that the
proposed project would require a total of 84 parking spaces, however, the proposed project provides
two -car garages for each residential unit, resulting in 112 parking spaces. She added that 20 guest
surface parking spaces would be provided for a total of 132 on -site parking spaces, 48 more parking
spaces than required by the reduced parking code requirement. She reported that conditions of
approval require that residents shall use designated parking areas, including garages, only for the
parking of vehicles. She noted that the 20 guest parking spaces shall be maintained on -site at all
times and residents shall not be permitted to park in the designated guest spaces.
Acting Director Allen reported that an Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed project and to
identify necessary mitigation pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
She shared that the environmental analysis was circulated to public agencies and interested parties.
She noted that the City received two (2) comment letters, and a response to the comments was
included as attachments to the material provided to the City Council. She shared that mitigation
measures have been identified in the IS/MND to mitigate project impacts to cultural resources,
geology and soils, and tribal cultural resources. She explained that with the implementation of these
measures, the IS/MND concluded that project impacts will be reduced to levels considered less than
significant, and there would be no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the
project.
Acting Director Allen reported that staff and the Planning Commission considered the project and
found that it is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and that the necessary
findings exist to approve the General Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map. She added that the
proposed project is compatible with surrounding land uses and is designed in a manner to provide a
quality living environment for its future residents. She shared that the proposed project meets the
goals of the General Plan to continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address
the City's diverse housing needs, would provide affordable housing in furtherance of the City's
Housing Element through the implementation of the Residential Opportunity Overlay Zone, and is
consistent with the City Council's policy identifying affordable housing as a priority.
DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava shared that the project is located in District 3. She
thanked the developer, Meritage Homes, for meeting with her and hosting events in the community.
She acknowledged that the project includes more parking than required, given that the project is
located in a parking -impacted area. She expressed concern about the setback, particularly the 7-foot
setback on Santa Ana Street. She inquired if staff anticipates safety concerns by accommodating the
setback from 15 feet to 7 feet.
Acting Director Allen noted that Public Works reviewed the project and did not express concerns with
the setback.
Council Member Rubalcava requested that staff conduct a traffic study on Santa Ana Street. She
explained that she has received several complaints from residents at Colony Park. She shared that
Colony Park residents are also required to park in their garages, however, the residents may not be
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 21 of 26
utilizing the space that is accounted for parking. She requested that staff maintain enforcement in the
area. She reported that residents residing across from the Packing House have complained about the
unhoused population congregating in their green spaces. She requested that staff consider
minimizing the green space due to District Ts park -rich nature, the lack of security for the property, to
reduce added calls to the Anaheim Police Department, and include additional parking. She expressed
her appreciation for the Planning Commission's support and that the properties are for -sale units. She
reiterated her request for a traffic study.
Council Member Meeks expressed appreciation for the project, including more parking spaces than
required. She inquired how the guest parking spaces would be monitored to prevent Packing House
customers from parking in those spaces.
Acting Director Allen reported that the Planning Commission requested that a condition of approval
was included to require that guest spaces be reserved for the project and for guests.
Council Member Rubalcava requested that the developer consider an in -lieu fee for the project. She
noted that the City Council recently adopted the inclusionary housing policy requiring 15% of projects
to be affordable or an in -lieu fee to be provided. She explained that although the policy does not
apply to for -sale, it would still be a good faith effort by the developer, considering the proposed
development is moderate housing.
Council Member Faessel stated that he did not have any comments or questions.
Mayor Aitken mentioned that she met with the developer and several residents on the project. She
highlighted two commitments, including the heightened level of onsite parking and the affordable
units. She thanked the developer for their goodwill gesture to include affordable units, although they
were not required to follow the City's inclusionary housing policy. She noted that the developer had
mentioned that they were going to be assisting financially to obtain parking permits for residents on
Olive Street if they obtained the required signatures for permit parking.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz requested that the City Council disclose any ex parte communications.
Council Member Diaz reported that he met with the developer.
Council Member Leon disclosed that he met with the developer.
Council Member Rubalcava reported that she met with the developer.
Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz disclosed that she met with the developer.
Council Member Faessel reported that he did not meet with the developer.
At 7:08 p.m., Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz opened the public hearing.
Johanna Crooker thanked the City Council for consideration of the project and staff for their work
during the process. She shared that Meritage Homes is the fifth largest home builder in the Country
by number of closings. She reported that the company has been in business for over 38 years and
during that time has built over 190,000 homes. She added that they are active in 21 markets across
the United States and are actively selling in 16 communities in Southern California. She noted that
Meritage is a recipient of the Avid Award for homebuilders, which measures customer satisfaction.
She added that they have won the Energy Star Partner of the Year award over the past 13 years for
their participation in providing high-energy homes. She highlighted the developer's humanitarian and
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 22 of 26
philanthropic efforts, including winning the Hearthstone BUILDER Humanitarian Award and their
operation of Homefront, which provides homes to veterans in need.
Ms. Crooker reported that Meritage focuses on market -rate homes specifically designed for first-time
home buyers and first move -up buyers. She shared that Meritage focuses on efficient design and
construction that allows them to keep price points at a low level, infill housing, low maintenance
amenities to keep homeowner association (HOA) costs low, and financial attainability by design. She
added that the proposed project is designated for 56 units and would help to fulfill the City's Regional
Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) numbers. She highlighted the developer's energy initiatives, noting
that all of the homes include solar and Energy Star appliances. She shared that all of the garages are
Electric Vehicle (EV) ready and the attics are spray foamed for thermal regulation. She reported that
Meritage is efficient with water through irrigation and plumbing fixtures, which contributes to energy
efficiency. She highlighted the upgraded filters and low -volatile organic compounds (VOCs) materials
to focus on indoor air quality.
Ms. Crooker reported that the proposed project includes feedback from staff and community
stakeholders. She highlighted the public outreach that Meritage conducted, including flyers distributed
to the public with facts about the project. She shared that the developer met with the Historic
Committee to ensure the proposed site includes a blend of the historic features and maintains the
industrial legacy of the site. She added that the air conditioning units were moved off of Santa Ana
Street to ensure that the streetscapes remain walkable. She noted that the alleys were screened and
that the existing trees remained planted.
Ms. Crooker reported that the developer focused on improving the alley to make it more front -door
friendly. She shared that the area is intended to become a shared pedestrian space and would
encourage traffic to slow down. She added that the front doors will have cameras installed to ensure
accountability. She noted that patio space was added along the side streets to engage Philadelphia
Street and Claudina. She highlighted the use of salvaged materials from the site; however, due to the
condition, they were not functional. She shared that the developer incorporated industrial features in
open space areas to include the wood and lumber elements of the site. She added that design
elements from the Packing House were incorporated into the design of the project.
Ms. Crooker highlighted the various community meetings held for the project. She shared that the
radius was 500 feet, with 10 attendees, with a favorable response for the project. She shared that the
primary concerns were crime, parking, and traffic. She reported that the project includes more parking
than required. She explained that the parking at the Packing House is not part of the proposed
project. She shared that four -bedroom units were not included based on parking issues in the area.
She added that although the City may not be able to enforce the Covenants, Conditions, &
Restrictions (CC&Rs), the City can enforce Zoning Code requirements for parking. She confirmed the
request from neighbors to assist with adding a parking district and paying the fees necessary. She
explained that there will be changes to the traffic signal to address traffic concerns. She noted that
the project will clean up the area significantly to help reduce crime and discourage criminal activity.
She shared that the developer is committed to installing doorbell cameras for each unit and installing
surveillance monitoring in common open space areas.
City Clerk Theresa Bass reported a total of two (2) public comments were received electronically
related to Public Hearing Item No. 19. [A final total of two (2) public comments were received
electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix.
Marc Herbert noted issues with public engagement for the project. He shared that the project did not
list any affordable units in the Housing Element. He explained that the Housing Element Update
Committee has not met in over three years. He referenced the Hills Preserve project and the
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 23 of 26
community's ability to gather legal resources to challenge the project. He explained that inaccurate
information is being presented in the Housing Element, and he will be providing the information to the
State.
Mayor Aitken confirmed there were no public comments from the teleconference location.
Ms. Crooker concluded that the developer has no control over the Housing Element. She shared that
the developer is willing to offer an in -lieu fee on top of the affordable units included in the project.
At 7:42 p.m., Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz closed the public hearing.
Council Member Diaz highlighted the project, the project location, the design features, and the
project's ability to improve the area. He shared that the project would help residents purchase homes
with additional parking than required, and affordable housing opportunities.
Council Member Meeks expressed her support for the project. She shared that the project will
improve the neighborhood and provide a quality experience for residents. She highlighted the
opportunities the project will provide for new homeowners. She expressed concern over access to
guest parking if other residents or Packing House customers use the spaces.
Ms. Crooker explained that the HOA will be enforcing the guest parking requirements, and there will
be signage. She shared that parking passes can be issued to residents for guests. She added that
the developer can work with staff to find solutions.
Council Member Meeks encouraged the developer to work with staff on finding best practices and
incorporating the solutions into the CC&Rs.
Ms. Crooker confirmed the developer will work with staff to find solutions.
Council Member Rubalcava thanked the developers for being good partners to the community and
staff. She echoed Council Member Diaz's comments about the project enhancing the area. She
expressed appreciation that the developer is willing to work with residents on the parking permit
process.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chris Bennett with LAB, shared that the empty site has
been used through entitlement to find a plan for overflow valet parking. He shared that LAB has
agreements for off -site parking if the project is approved for development.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern about the partnership with the community to address
parking and trash concerns.
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Mr. Bennett mentioned that although valet parking is not
a requirement, it was added to alleviate the overflow parking. He shared that there are other parking
sites available that may not be the most convenient for customers. He explained that the valet
service, although expensive, was implemented to address parking and traffic concerns. He added
that LAB takes pride in its properties and strives to be a good neighbor in the community.
Council Member Rubalcava reported that she received feedback from residents who were offered to
park in public parking on Anaheim Boulevard and are now being towed. She requested that the
operators find solutions for the parking issues. She requested that the operator work with the
community to be a better partner
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 24 of 26
In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director of Public Works Rudy Emami shared that Public
Works has been working to reduce speeds on Santa Ana Street. He added that there are bulb -outs,
lane markings, and crosswalk markings on the street. He noted that every time a new development or
business comes in, Public Works will continue to conduct additional monitoring as part of the
environmental study, to implement any mitigation measures, as part of the approval of the project.
Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern over the driveway and safety issues for pedestrians
and individuals using the sidewalks. Director of Public Works Emami explained that a line of sight
analysis is conducted anytime a new driveway or development is being presented to ensure safety for
pedestrians, vehicles, and bicyclists. He clarified that the ordinance considered for E-Bikes was to
address speed concerns.
Council Member Rubalcava mentioned that she will follow up regarding the speed of vehicles on
Santa Ana and an in -lieu fee contribution.
Council Member Faessel expressed his appreciation for the additional 36% of parking. He noted that
the project will improve the neighborhood and that the units will be sold at lower rates than the typical
market rates.
Mayor Aitken confirmed that she did not have any comments or questions.
Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz highlighted the project. She thanked Public Works for monitoring speeding on
Santa Ana Street.
MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2024-117 A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 391 for Development Application
No. 2023-00042 (275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street); RESOLUTION NO. 2024-118 A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan of
the City of Anaheim (DEV2023-00042) (275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street); and RESOLUTION NO.
2024-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
approving Tentative Tract Map No. 19290 and making certain findings in connection therewith
(DEV2023-00042) (275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street), seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz. ROLL
CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel,
and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried.
13137.1 20. This is a public hearing under the requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act
and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to consider a resolution approving the
issuance of the California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Bonds, in an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed $37,000,000, for the purpose of financing and refinancing the
cost of the acquisition, construction, renovation, equipping and furnishing of healthcare
facilities and other related and appurtenant facilities for the benefit of Benevolence Industries
Incorporated, dba Benevolence Health Centers, a California nonprofit public benefit
corporation, located at: 1010 Crenshaw Boulevard, Suite 100, Torrance, California 90501; 303
North East Street, Anaheim, California 92805 (Anaheim Facility); 1126 East South Street,
Long Beach, California 90805; 505-515 North Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, California
92401; 3631 Crenshaw Boulevard, Suite 109, Los Angeles, California 90016; and 12610
Glenoaks Boulevard (also known as 14040 Hubbard Street), Sylmar, California 91342, and
providing the terms and conditions for such Bonds and other matters relating thereto.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 25 of 26
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the issuance of revenue bonds pursuant to a plan of finance by
the California Enterprise Development Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $37,000,000 for the purpose of financing and refinancing the cost of the acquisition,
construction, renovation, equipping and furnishing of certain healthcare facilities for the benefit
of Benevolence Industries Incorporated and/or a related or successor entity, providing the
terms and conditions for such bonds, and other matters relating thereto.
Director Moreno reported that the California Enterprise Development Authority (Authority) requested
that the City hold a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) hearing on behalf of
Benevolence Industries Incorporated, as required by the Internal Revenue Code. She explained that
in order to issue revenue bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $37 million for the
purpose of financing and refinancing health care facilities, including improvement at the Benevolent
Health Centers, Anaheim Facility. She shared that the revenue bonds are issued by the Authority and
not by the City and will be payable solely by the borrower. She explained that the City's role is to
satisfy the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code by holding the public hearing within the
jurisdiction of the project.
Council Member Faessel and Mayor Aitken confirmed they did not have any questions related to the
public hearing.
At 7:59 p.m., Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz opened the public hearing.
City Clerk Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing
Item No. 20.
Marc Herbert requested clarification on the City's responsibility through the bond process. He
suggested including additional information for the public on the bonds. He shared that upon review,
the bonds were not included in the upcoming budget. He highlighted financial issues around deficits,
including the $42 million deficit that will be covered by bonds issued during the pandemic. He shared
that the forecasted deficits may not be covered by those bonds. He referenced the Tampico Housing
Development and the proposed budget for the Housing and Community Development Department.
He added that the proposed budget did not account for recent labor contracts. He requested that the
City Council consider the bond obligations.
Mayor Aitken confirmed that there were no in -person speakers from the teleconference location.
At 8:05 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Kurtz closed the public hearing.
In response to Council Member Diaz, Director Moreno confirmed that the legislative body in the
jurisdiction is required to hold a public hearing for tax-exempt bonds. She noted that the City is
merely facilitating the process and is not obligated to pay the bonds.
MOTION: Council Member Diaz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. _ 2024-120 _ A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the issuance of
revenue bonds pursuant to a plan of finance by the California Enterprise Development Authority in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $37,000,000 for the purpose of financing and refinancing
the cost of the acquisition, construction, renovation, equipping and furnishing of certain healthcare
facilities for the benefit of Benevolence Industries Incorporated and/or a related or successor entity,
providing the terms and conditions for such bonds, and other matters relating thereto, seconded by
Council Member Faessel. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz,
Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried.
City Council Minutes of November 13, 2024
Page 26 of 26
REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela reported that for
Closed Session Item No. 2, the City Council, by a vote of 4 to 3 (AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council
Members Diaz, Kurtz, and Faessel; NOES: Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, and Meeks), directed
the City Attorney to dismiss the pending appeal.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (non -agenda items): None
COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING:
Council Member Rubalcava asked when the new Mayor Pro Tern appointment will be on the agenda.
City Clerk Theresa Bass responded on December 17, 2024.
ADJOURNMENT: At 8:08 p.m., Mayor Pro Tern Kurtz adjourned the City Council in memory of
Jacob Anthony Maldonado.
Res p tfu ly submitted,
Theresa Bass, CIVIC
City Clerk
From: Tino Rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 1:39 PM
To: Public Comment; Thomas Gorham; Tino Rodriguez;
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Development Application No. 2023-00042 - Rodriguez Comments
Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I received notice that the City Planning Commission intends to recommend approval of the subject
development project. There was no information presented on how the City plans to mitigate the parking
situation. I moved to this area in 2023 because of the great potential that I saw. I truly believe that the
downtown Anaheim area has great potential if planning is done carefully.
The current parking situation needs the attention of the City as is (before this project). I live in the Domain
condominiums and there is an extreme parking problem from Thursday evening to Sunday afternoon. Any
guests or family that visit us in this time frame have an extremely difficult time finding parking. I know this
is not news to anyone. But, it is surprising that the City has not addressed this situation in any way that I
have knowledge of. The subject project property is currently used for overflow parking (Valet parking) on
Fridays and/or Saturdays. Based on my observations, there are usually 40 to 80 cars in that lot. Now with
this option potentially gone and the introduction of 55 additional vehicles (one guest per unit), that's
potentially over 100 cars that need a parking spot. There are two serious concerns. One is that visitors to
the Packing House and Farmers Park area will be discouraged from returning as the parking situation has
left a "bad taste in their mouth" and the whole experience becomes a negative one. I myself have avoided
some top rated places due to the bad parking situation associated with those places. This can hurt the
local businesses. The other concern is for the local residents. We should be entitled to have guests visit
us at our homes without a project like this making the parking situation too bad to bear.
If this project is approved without the City mitigating the parking situation, its easy to foresee the
unfortunate negative impact that it will have on our quality of life and potential property value losses.
Please reconsider the approval of this project or build a parking structure nearby to fix the parking
situation first, then approve the condos after the parking structure is fixed.
Anaheim Domain Condos Resident
Tino Rodriguez
From: Joshua and Jessica Johnso
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9:32 PM
To: Thomas Gorham <TGorham(@anaheim.net>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] THE MILL - PROPOSED FOR -SALE TOWNHOMES LOCATED AT 275 and 375 E. SANTA ANA ST.
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Hello Thomas,
Please see our attached letter for support for The Mill townhomes that are being proposed.
We apologize that we could not sign the letter. Our printer is not working at this time.
Thank you,
Jessica and Joshua Johnson
November 12, 2024
Thomas Gorham
Contract Planner
Planning and Building Department I Planning Services
City of Anaheim
200 South Anaheim Boulevard I Suite 162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Phone: (714) 765-4947
Email: tgorham@anaheim.net
RE: THE MILL -PROPOSED FOR -SALE TOWNHOMES LOCATED AT 275 and 375 E. SANTA ANA ST.
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council members:
We want to express our support for the proposed for -sale townhomes located at 275 and 375 East
Santa Ana Street. Josh is an employee in the city of Anaheim, and we are interested in purchasing
a home, yet affordability is a serious issue for many families like ours. This for -sale project offers
10% of the homes affordable to homebuyers at moderate income levels, which provides a unique
opportunity for us and other families to fulfill the dream of homeownership in a community that
we work in and wish to call home. As such, we encourage you to approve this project.
Thank you,
Jessica & Josh (and Silas) Johnson
From: Matt Nordeman
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 5:53 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Afternoon traffic in Anaheim Hills near 91
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Hello,
I live in Anaheim Hills off of Serrano. I am hoping the city can address the ridiculous traffic of commuters cutting through
Anaheim Hills to get onto the freeway at Weir Canyon. I've lived here for 10 years and I've never seen it this bad.
Commuters have also been cutting through neighborhoods as well. This creates an unpleasant, unsafe and poor quality
of life for the residents.
Please let me know if there is anything I can do as a taxpayer, or anything I can do to help.
Thank you!
Matthew Nordeman
Sent from my iPhone
From: Bill Kerr
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 8:09 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon Apartment Project
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Subject: Deer Canyon Apartment Project
Dear Anaheim City Council,
I am writing to express my urgent concerns regarding the proposed 498-unit Deer Canyon apartment complex
in Anaheim Hills. While I recognize the need to address Southern California's housing challenges, this
particular development on the 76-acre wilderness area off Santa Ana Canyon Road raises several critical
issues that would negatively impact our community and environment.
1. Increased Traffic, Noise, and Pollution: The proposed development would significantly increase traffic on
Santa Ana Canyon Road, directly affecting families who live along or near the route. Currently, the noise and
smog from the nearby 91 Freeway already impact residents, and this additional traffic burden would exacerbate
the issue, diminishing our community's quality of life. Our neighborhoods cannot endure the worsening
conditions that this development would impose.
2. Destruction of Local Wildlife Habitat: The Deer Canyon area is home to various wildlife species, whose
habitats would be destroyed by this speculative project. This natural area serves as a vital sanctuary for these
species, and the proposed development would result in the irreversible loss of biodiversity and disrupt the
ecological balance of the region.
3. Loss of Vegetation Benefiting Air Quality: The vegetation in Deer Canyon plays an essential role in filtering
the air, helping mitigate smog from the 91 Freeway. When freeway congestion increases, many vehicles,
including heavy trucks, exit on Imperial Highway and take the winding route through our area to bypass traffic,
adding even more pollution. Removing this vegetation would have direct, adverse effects on air quality for
Anaheim Hills residents.
4. Increased Safety Risks in a High -Risk Zone: Adding nearly 500 units in Anaheim Hills raises serious safety
concerns. Our area sits near the San Andreas Fault, increasing the risk of structural failure and significant
danger during earthquakes.
Additionally, Anaheim Hills is at high risk for wildfires, and the increased population density would complicate
evacuation during emergencies, putting lives at risk! Developing in a high -risk area like this is simply not
prudent, as it would likely result in complex and potentially hazardous evacuation scenarios
In light of these concerns, I urge the City Council to reconsider the Deer Canyon apartment project. The long-
term impacts on traffic, environmental stability, air quality, and resident safety in Anaheim Hills should be
prioritized over speculative real estate interests. Rather than contribute to overdevelopment in a sensitive area,
I hope the Council will focus on sustainable, well -considered solutions that genuinely address the housing crisis
without compromising the integrity of our community.
Thank you for considering these comments. I appreciate your commitment to listening to the voices of Anaheim
residents.
Sincerely,
Bill Kerr
29 year Anaheim Hills resident
From: Grace McGee
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 11:34 AM
To: Public Comment; Ashleigh Aitken; Natalie Meeks; Nicholas J. Taylor; Stephen Faessel;
Natalie Rubalcava; Jose Diaz
Subject: [EXTERNAL] THANK YOU for voting against the Deer Canyon Development
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I want to sincerely say Thank You to all of you on our City Council, and also very much to City Staff, for recognizing the
many fire evacuation safety concerns of the SALT development project in our very high fire severity zone.
Thank You for putting the safety of residents first and foremost. It means so very much that you have put the safety of
your neighbors, family and friends in the area as your top priority, and ahead of other possible objectives.
We are so appreciative of all of your difficult work on this, and so proud that our City Officials know to do 'the right
thing'.
Most sincerely,
Grace McGee
Sent from my iPhone
From: Christopher Raser
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 2:29 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] NO Deer Canyon Development
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I wanted to let you know that as a resident of Orange, I oppose SALT Development's proposed project to
build in Deer Canyon.
I'm a cyclist, and ride through Deer Canyon all the time. It's an absolutely beautiful place and part of
what makes our community such a great place to live.
I'm not opposed to development, but the idea of this beautiful park becoming an apartment complex just
breaks my heart. Surely there must be somewhere else SALT Development can build.
-Christopher Raser
Orange, CA
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
You don't often get email from
Jake Steen
Wednesday, October 30, 2024 3:31 PM
Public Comment
[EXTERNAL] Save Deer Canyon
Learn whV this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Hello,
My name is Jake Steen, a 28 year resident of Anaheim Hills.
I wanted to express my opposition to the large development being considered in Deer Canyon.
There's already enough traffic along santa ana canyon road, and additional multi -unit housing
neighborhoods would only add to the congestion and safety issues.
From: Jean Brow
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 6:43 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear city council,
Have you ever been on Santa Ana canyon road between 7 to 9 in the morning and 4 to 6 in the afternoon? It's so
congested! That is the main reason to not support the Deer Canyon project but it's also will reduce the little wild life
that's left in the area.
Please vote no. Thank you.
Jean Brown
From: SUNNY R HARRISON
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2024 4:20 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: ANAHEIM HILLS DEER CANYON SALT PROPOSED PROJECT
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I am unable to attend the hearing in person as I do not generally drive at night. I grew up in Anaheim, am an Anaheim
High School graduate, married and raised my kids in Anaheim Hills and they all attended public school here. I have lived
in my current home for almost 40 years. We have come close to evacuation several times, had "ash" from fires rain on
our yard previously, dealt with very bad air quality from fires as well as earthquake damage and experienced Santa Ana
winds which can be quite strong.
The schools in this area are overcrowded. Not enough parks for the children's sports leagues. We have a part-time
police substation and the fire department will not be sufficient to take care of this project or the one that is 400 units
under consideration by Festival Center less than two miles away.
The amount of grading, retaining walls needed and removal of 70 full grown trees is alarming — it is beyond belief that
there will not be anything unforeseen from that alone. When the 55 freeway was widened there was a slope failure.
We've had some other slope failures in the past in this area. It is a high fire danger area and the winds can be very bad
which should be considered. Santa Ana Canyon Road curves just beyond the planned development which has had its
own traffic problems (speeding teenagers from area for one) that a traffic light will not help.
This is an ill conceived project for that particular parcel of land. Please do not approve the rezoning.
Thank you.
From: Dong Vu
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 11:26 PM
To: Public Comment; Ashleigh Aitken; Natalie Meeks; donald.wagner@ocgov.com
Cc: Jalene Pham
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Appreciation for Denying the Salt Development Project and Prioritizing
Community Safety
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my appreciation for your decision to deny the Salt Development project. Your courage and
dedication to preserving Anaheim's natural resources reflect a deep commitment to our community's long-term well-being
and safety.
In addition to safeguarding this precious, preserved land, your decision is critical in protecting Anaheim Hills residents
from potential wildfire hazards. The project's proposed location would have obstructed essential evacuation routes, posing
a catastrophic risk to residents during emergencies. By prioritizing community safety, you have demonstrated remarkable
foresight and responsibility in preventing what could have been a devastating impact on lives.
Thank you once again for your leadership, integrity, and commitment to Anaheim residents' safety and quality of life. We
sincerely appreciate your efforts to protect our environment and our community.
Sincerely,
Dong Vu
From: Barbara Higgins
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 10:59 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Canyon
[You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I I do not feel comfortable looking at what is in my future. If all this development happens. I'm concerned I would not be
able to evacuate as I would like to or will have to. I love where I live. I love how I live. Please keep it.
Sent from my iPhone
From: Tim Tynan
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2024 11:27 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] No Development in Deer Canyon
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I vote no on the Deer Canyon development project.
The plan fails to take into account extra access on Santa Ana Canyon Road in front of the project. Early morning and late
afternoon. The roads are crowded as well as the freeway in an emergency as in the last big fire center and Canyon was
reduced to one lane each way. I personally spent an hour and a half going 1 mile trying to evacuate. The city cannot put
it citizens in danger without significant improvements to Santa Ana Canyon Road prior to future development in the area.
Anyone that votes in favor of this project as it is currently written will be voted against in the next election. I personally
will make it my ambition to take out of office anyone that votes in favor of this its current state.
Tim Tynan - Anaheim Foothills Association resident
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
You don't often get email from
Joseph Conway
Friday, November 1, 2024 9:40 AM
Public Comment
[EXTERNAL] RE: Please vote NO tonight!
Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I want to thank the City Council for doing the right thing for the citizens of Anaheim Hills. It is
greatly appreciated. I am sure it was a very difficult decision. Thank you from all of us!
Joseph W. Conway, AIF°
President
CA Insurance License #OA34370
Diversified Investment Services, Inc.
180 N. Riverview Dr., Suite 220
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
email: iconway@disinc.com
phone: (714)974-4500
fax: (714)974-7943
www.disinc.com
r�.
DIV rrF4 IrIFia
The greatest compliment I can receive is the referral of family, friends or colleagues.
1
The financial professionals of Diversified Investment Services are registered representative and investment adviser representatives with and offer
securities and advisory services through Commonwealth Financial Network, Member FINRA/SIPC, a Registered Investment Adviser.
We recommend that you never send via email any instructions pertaining to a securities transaction, such as buying or selling an investment, or
making a deposit or withdrawal from your account. Instead, please telephone our office and speak with someone personally. Due to the
limitations of technology, as well as privacy concerns, for your own protection, we cannot accept orders via email or voicemail.
This message is confidential and intended for the private use of the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and
inform me of this transmission error.
When evaluating investments, please note that past performance cannot guarantee future results. Furthermore, investment returns and principal
values fluctuate, so that an investor's shares, on redemption, may be worth more or less than original cost. Please be sure to read the investment
prospectus carefully as it contains information you should know regarding charges, expenses, investment objectives and risk factors.
From: Joseph Conway
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 8:57 AM
To: publiccomment@anaheim.net
Subject: Please vote NO tonight!
I have been a resident of Anaheim Hills for over 40 years and live off of Santa Ana Canyon
Road. It is already a nightmare every single day with traffic. It is a death trap already when we
have another fire. Please Vote No against the Deer Canyon
Project. Those who comment on the project and live in other parts of Anaheim have no
idea what we are talking about with the congestion on Santa Ana Canyon Road..
Joe and Vickie Conway
Anaheim Hills, Ca. 92808
Joseph W. Conway, AIF°
President
CA Insurance License #OA34370
Diversified Investment Services, Inc.
180 N. Riverview Dr., Suite 220
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
email: iconway@disinc.com
phone: (714)974-4500
fax: (714)974-7943
www.disinc.com
,+
si��ib is
',6 ra,'O- .t f,n,e��.,�,� rwo,' ?rrr f err
The greatest compliment I can receive is the referral of family, friends or colleagues.
The financial professionals of Diversified Investment Services are registered representative and investment adviser representatives with and offer
securities and advisory services through Commonwealth Financial Network, Member FINRA/SIPC, a Registered Investment Adviser.
We recommend that you never send via email any instructions pertaining to a securities transaction, such as buying or selling an investment, or
making a deposit or withdrawal from your account. Instead, please telephone our office and speak with someone personally. Due to the
limitations of technology, as well as privacy concerns, for your own protection, we cannot accept orders via email or voicemail.
This message is confidential and intended for the private use of the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and
inform me of this transmission error.
When evaluating investments, please note that past performance cannot guarantee future results. Furthermore, investment returns and principal
values fluctuate, so that an investor's shares, on redemption, may be worth more or less than original cost. Please be sure to read the investment
prospectus carefully as it contains information you should know regarding charges, expenses, investment objectives and risk factors.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Craig A Durfey
Friday, November 1, 2024 9:42 AM
[EXTERNAL] Fwd: = Norway put the brakes on social media.
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Protect Young Eyes <chris _protectyoungeyes.com>
Date: Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 9:25 AM
Subject: Norway put the brakes on social media.
To:
The PYE Download: November 1, 2024
1
Hello! Every three weeks or so, we share the latest digital news that impacts
your family, update you on what the Protect Young Eyes team is up to, and
end with a quick note from Chris.
We hope our research helps you feel informed and confident, and that our
work with schools, churches, and non -profits is motivating.
The latest news:
• A smartwatch boom amid phone -free policies. This means worried
parents aren't letting go. Here's our Apple Watch Guide —enable
"Schooltime" during the day!
• Roblox is a "pedophile hellscape." Hindenburg Research reported
unsettling findings from its test accounts. Roblox responded with
more parental controls instead of removing the issues. It's a typical
big tech, "Not our problem" response.
• Can Al be blamed for a teen's suicide? This is the question before
a FL court after 14-year-old Sewell developed a deeply personal
relationship with an Al chatbot. Have you talked to your kids
about Al? Here's our Instagram post with thoughts.
• 10S 18 allows FaceTime contacts to "remote access" your phone.
This means anyone in your contacts, on a FaceTime call, can
request access to your phone. Prevent with: "Communication
Limits," toggle off "Allow Contact Editing" and ensure your child's
contacts are the right ones.
• Internal documents show Snapchat had 10,000 monthly sextortion
reports. This was uncovered in discovery because of a New
Mexico child safety lawsuit. Snapchat is tough on teen brains and
in some, easily exploits vulnerabilities.
• Norway is raising the minimum social media age to 15. "These are
big tech giants pitted against the brains of small children," says
Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store.
4
• Linkedln is training Al without our permission. The default setting is
"on." Opt -out by logging into Linkedln, clicking your headshot, and
opening Settings. Then, select "Data privacy," and turn off the
option under "Data for generative Al improvement."
• High school is a cesspool of deepfake images. A Center for
Democracy and Education report uncovers the depth of
nonconsensual image sharing among teens. Is it too late to reign
in Al? Some think so.
• YouTube is social media. Similar features, highly engaging,
comments, likes, followers (subscribers). Stay on top of it with our
ultimate guide!
What PYE is up to:
MtIECRRF��
Masterclass - Roblox,
Fortnite, & Minecraft
Three of the most popular and
problematic gaming platforms. On
November 14, PYE will hold a free,
55-minute deep dive into the risks
and controls in these critical games.
rRe:gi!sMteMrToda3
We're rebuilding the PYE website from the bottom up! I can't wait for you to
see it. Look for our "Delay Manifesto'' as part of the launch. We hope you'll
sign it.
Pass #KOSA now: regardless of who wins the November 5 election, the lame
duck period could see significant activity (the final six weeks of the
legislative session). Stay connected to our social accounts for more details!
3
Global Guide
Most posts talk about amazing kid -
safe phones like Bark and Gabb.
But outside of the USA, there are
few options. This is why we explain
flip phones, old iPhones, and other
more typical options in our Global
Kid Phone Guide.
Where we speak over the next month:
(PYE Master Calendar)
• Nov. 2, Providence Classical Christian School, GA
• Nov. 6, Excel Charter Academy, MI
• Nov. 6, Hilltown Baptist Church Moms, PA
• Nov. 7, Souixland Modern Media Committee, IA
• Nov. 7-8, St. Joseph School, WI
• Nov. 10, Christ Church, MI
• Nov. 11, Sunshine Community Church, MI
• Nov. 12, Liberty Classical Academy, MN
• Nov. 12-13, Conestoga Christian School, PA
• Nov. 12-13, Juniper Serra High School, CA
• Nov. 13-14, St. Michael Lutheran, MI
• Nov. 14, Ada Christian, MI
• Nov. 17, Brenneman Missionary Church, IN
• Nov. 18-19, Word of Life Lutheran School, MO
• Nov. 19-20, Liberty Christian School, TX
• Nov. 20, Holy Name Catholic School, MI
• Nov. 21, Waushara County Anti -Trafficking Committee, WI
• Nov. 21, Jonathan Edwards Classical Academy, TN
• Nov. 25, Grand Rapids Christian Middle School, MI
• Nov. 26, Holy Name Catholic School, MI
• Email Michele right here to bring us to your community!
A note from Chris:
4
Recently, I asked my son, who is 13, to get out of the house for some fresh
air. So, while I was out running errands, he took off on his bike.
We live in the country and there's a path to our small, rural town, so I figured
that's where he went, but he didn't take his Gabb phone with him, so I
wasn't sure.
had no idea where he was. And I started to worry.
Then 2 thoughts hit me.
Thought #1 was "Wait - this is what parenting in the 1980s was like all
summer. My parents had a general idea of where I was - at the park, or at
Mark's house down the road. And that was enough!"
Then, thought #2 was, "What if all this tracking and tech and algorithm -
driven bad news have conditioned me to worry?"
BOOM. I've been groomed to know exactly where he is. And when I don't,
I've been conditioned to worry. We all have.
Now he's a good kid. He knows how to get home. Having his Gabb phone
with him wouldn't stop anyone from kidnapping him.
So, yeah, we're the ones who worry - a lot. We fight against phone -free
school policies because of mostly illogical things. Like safety during an
active shooter situation, which doesn't make sense. Like needing to pepper
our kids with texts all day. Which actually contributes to their anxiety.
It's us. It's us. It's us!
Now he made it home just fine. Will I have him take his phone when he
takes the next bike ride? You bet. There aren't pay phones on corners
anymore if he needs something. But my big realization is that when he's out,
I need to check less.
Parenting with you,
Chris & PYE
#delayistheway
113 Cherry St #92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2205
Unsubscribe - Preferences
5
From:
KATHY CHANCE
Sent:
Friday, November 1, 2024 2:04 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] Request removal of Chief of Police RICK ARMENDARIZ (no control of
illegal fireworks on 4th of July 2024)
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I respectfully request the removal of Anaheim Chief of Police, Rick
Armendariz. Chief Armendariz had no control over the City of
Anaheim on the 4th of July 2024, even after several months of
planning, and caused our city to be placed into dangerous and fire -
hazardous conditions. I request his removal immediately. His
team, after months of prep and training for the 4th of July 2024,
along with Anaheim Fire, failed our city and placed all of us in
danger.
I am in receipt, and have reviewed, the 20 PAGES (est 30-40 calls per page) of Fireworks
Complaint Calls for the ENTIRE city of Anaheim to Anaheim Police from WED 7/3 - SUN
7/7, 2024. All Calls from my tract in District 1, 92804 to Anaheim Police Dispatch were
CANCELED, other than one of which officer(s) stated they saw nothing (July 4th).
Anaheim Police and Anaheim Fire ignored all of the pre-4th illegal fireworks concerns that
were placed online on their website devoted to this issue. Yet now the Anaheim Fire
Department has no records, not even the concerns added to their own website? As well,
the majority of Fireworks call complaints throughout the entire city were CANCELED!
On July 18, 2024 Anaheim Deputy City Attorney, Bryn M. Morley, responded to me in
writing via a USPS-mailed letter. The letter states that my public request for records
pertaining to illegal fireworks had been received but, "Despite a diligent search, the
Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department was unable to locate records that fall within the
scope of your (my) request. "
ered surveillance footage of what had occurred directly around my home, but APD never
requested to view my videos. I placed a Code Complaint and also offered copies of the
videos showing proof of what transpired and was told by Code since it is after the fact,
there is no action which they can take.
I off
1
I request the City Council to ask for an investigation and agendize for the Chief of Police
and the Anaheim Fire Chief to explain WHY they had absolutely NO CONTROL on the 4th
of July 2024, during a city council meeting! Of 20 PAGES, with an estimated 30-40
complaints per page of city-wide complaints, APD issued only 28 citations!!!!!!!
I would like to know WHO funded the illegal fireworks website that apparently no one was
monitoring. Was this also at the taxpayer's expense? WHO funded all of this so-called
months and months of training and prep for APD and Anaheim Fire to be prepared to
handle illegal fireworks on the 4th of July, us taxpayer's?
It appears this city, police and fire continue to abuse our taxpayer funds. Where is all of
our money going????
N
From:
KATHY CHANCE
Sent:
Friday, November 1, 2024 2:06 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] Request removal of Chief of Police RICK ARMENDARIZ (no control of
illegal fireworks on 4th of July 2024)
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I respectfully request the removal of Anaheim Chief of Police, Rick
Armendariz. Chief Armendariz had no control over the City of
Anaheim on the 4th of July 2024, even after several months of
planning, and caused our city to be placed into dangerous and fire -
hazardous conditions. I request his removal immediately. His
team, after months of prep and training for the 4th of July 2024,
along with Anaheim Fire, failed our city and placed all of us in
danger.
I am in receipt, and have reviewed, the 20 PAGES (est 30-40 calls per page) of Fireworks
Complaint Calls for the ENTIRE city of Anaheim to Anaheim Police from WED 7/3 - SUN
7/7, 2024. All Calls from my tract in District 1, 92804 to Anaheim Police Dispatch were
CANCELED, other than one of which officer(s) stated they saw nothing (July 4th).
Anaheim Police and Anaheim Fire ignored all of the pre-4th illegal fireworks concerns that
were placed online on their website devoted to this issue. Yet now the Anaheim Fire
Department has no records, not even the concerns added to their own website? As well,
the majority of Fireworks call complaints throughout the entire city were CANCELED!
On July 18, 2024 Anaheim Deputy City Attorney, Bryn M. Morley, responded to me in
writing via a USPS-mailed letter. The letter states that my public request for records
pertaining to illegal fireworks had been received but, "Despite a diligent search, the
Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department was unable to locate records that fall within the
scope of your (my) request. "
I offered surveillance footage of what had occurred directly around my home, but APD
never requested to view my videos. I placed a Code Complaint and also offered copies of
the videos showing proof of what transpired and was told by Code since it is after the fact,
there is no action which they can take.
I request the City Council to ask for an investigation and agendize for the Chief of Police
and the Anaheim Fire Chief to explain WHY they had absolutely NO CONTROL on the 4th
1
of July 2024, during a city council meeting! Of 20 PAGES, with an estimated 30-40
complaints per page of city-wide complaints, APD issued only 28 citations!!!!!!!
I would like to know WHO funded the illegal fireworks website that apparently no one was
monitoring. Was this also at the taxpayer's expense? WHO funded all of this so-called
months and months of training and prep for APD and Anaheim Fire to be prepared to
handle illegal fireworks on the 4th of July, us taxpayer's?
It appears this city, police and fire continue to abuse our taxpayer funds. Where is all of
our money going?????????????????????????????????????????
This is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE!
COMPLETE FAIL!
Kathy Chance
34+ homeowner, 92804
N
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Craig A Durfey
[EXTERNAL] Utah students receive Hope Squad's mental health support
training
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
https://www.kst.com/article/5l l 65752/utah-students-receive-hope-squads-mental-health-support-
training?utm_source=email_share&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=news&utm_content=health
From: Barbara Dutcher
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2024 6:21 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon
You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
This will be a nightmare for traffic and safety in the event of a fire evacuation!
Please stop this project!!!!
B Dutcher
From: Joanne Munro
Sent: Sunday, Novem"erM0224:53 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition to Deer Canyon
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Anaheim City Council, I am writing to express my serious concerns regarding the proposed 498-unit Deer
Canyon apartment complex in Anaheim Hills. While I recognize the need to address Southern California's
housing challenges, this particular development on the 76-acre wilderness area off Santa Ana Canyon Road
raises several critical issues that would negatively impact our community and environment. 1. Increased
Traffic, Noise, and Pollution: The proposed development would significantly increase traffic on Santa Ana
Canyon Road, directly affecting families who live along or near the route. Currently, the noise and smog from
the nearby 91 Freeway already impact residents, and this additional traffic burden would exacerbate the issue,
diminishing our community's quality of life. Our neighborhoods cannot endure the worsening conditions that
this development would impose. 2. Destruction of Local Wildlife Habitat: The Deer Canyon area is home to
various wildlife species, whose habitats would be destroyed by this speculative project. This natural area
serves as a vital sanctuary for these species, and the proposed development would result in the irreversible
loss of biodiversity and disrupt the ecological balance of the region. 3. Loss of Vegetation Benefiting Air
Quality: The vegetation in Deer Canyon plays an essential role in filtering the air, helping mitigate smog from
the 91 Freeway. When freeway congestion increases, many vehicles, including heavy trucks, exit on Imperial
Highway and take the winding route through our area to bypass traffic, adding even more pollution. Removing
this vegetation would have direct, adverse effects on air quality for Anaheim Hills residents. 4. Increased
Safety Risks in a High -Risk Zone: Adding nearly 500 units in Anaheim Hills raises serious safety concerns. Our
area sits near the San Andreas Fault, increasing the risk of structural failure and significant danger during
earthquakes. Additionally, Anaheim Hills is at high risk for wildfires, and the increased population density
would complicate evacuation during emergencies, putting lives at risk. Developing in a high -risk area like this is
simply not prudent, as it would likely result in complex and potentially hazardous evacuation scenarios. In light
of these concerns, I urge the City Council to reconsider the Deer Canyon apartment project. The long-term
impacts on traffic, environmental stability, air quality, and resident safety in Anaheim Hills should be
prioritized over speculative real estate interests. Rather than contribute to overdevelopment in a sensitive
area, I hope the Council will focus on sustainable, well -considered solutions that genuinely address the
housing crisis without compromising the integrity of our community. Thank you for considering these
comments. I appreciate your commitment to listening to the voices of Anaheim residents.
Sincerely,
Dr. Joanne Munro
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world: Indeed it's the only thing that ever
has. "
Margaret MeadI
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
You don't often get email from
Michael Clark
Sunday, November 3, 2024 1:27 PM
Public Comment
[EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon Project
Learn whV this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Am writing to lend our voices opposing the Deer Canyon Project.
As two reasons, noted at the City Council meeting last week, the overwhelming and unmanageable traffic issues, and the
danger
to Anaheim Hills current residents that would occur during a mandatory fire and/or natural disaster evacuation,
far outweigh any benefits.
Linda and Michael Clark
Anaheim Hills 92807
From: Joe Abbey
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2024 7:24 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon Apartments Project
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Anaheim city council members!
I am writing you to express my extreme opposition of the deer canyon apartments being built. I am a resident of
Anaheim hills for over 30 years and am currently raising my young family here after having grown up here my whole life.
This is not the neighborhood for luxury apartments and is more well suited for downtown Anaheim. This is a quiet town
for folks who want a quiet safe area to raise their families. It's already so tough exiting when there are fire scares. I would
also be concerned with the increased risk of our safety with that many added people and losing part of the beauty that
makes Anaheim hills Anaheim hills. I can assure you if this project gets approved I will be moving my family to Yorba
Linda. Thanks for the opportunity to share my concerns and I praying you make the right choice to pass on this project
for a community it doesn't belong in. Thanks!
Joseph Abbey
From: Priscilla Tagle
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2024 11:31 PM
To: Public Comment
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Save Deer Canyon - PLEASE Preserve Deer Canyon
You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Anaheim City Council,
We kindly request each member of the Anaheim City Council to reconsider and vote "NO" to the SALT
Development of
an 8 Storey Luxury Apartment complex along the Santa Ana Canyon Road near the Deer Canyon. As it is,
traffic has
been getting heavier and heavier in the area and this proposal will add more congestion along Santa Ana
Canyon and
its surrounding neighborhood. And most of all, in a current worst case scenario, will add an additional 24
minutes to the
3 hours of evacuation in the area.
Please, we beg you to reconsider and VOTE "NO" to this proposal.
Thankyou so much for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Priscilla Tagle and Family of Anaheim Hills
November 3, 2024
From:
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2024 7:17 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] PLEASE STOP Deer Canyon project
You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I like to say I oppose this as a serious risk to the whole AH community. I have lived at
_for 10yrs and have experienced two fires in that time. This added traffic would be a huge
danger to us all.
Tommy Breen
From: Grace Au
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2024 11:27 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
City Council,
I live in the Westridge area of Anaheim Hills. I am concerned about the Deer Canyon project regarding fire safety. I
helped out at the Lahaina fires and first-hand saw burn victims who could not escape. Many had been stuck in their
vehicles and many had been on foot trying to escape. The magnitude of that fire was unimaginable and I cannot imagine
a repeat of that here in our own neighborhood. People told me how roads were blocked from traffic and they could
barely find their way out amidst the fire storm thatjumped from area to area for miles. I can only imagine those who
could not tell their stories because they were stuck in traffic in their vehicle trying to escape. Please seriously consider
the ramifications of making this area even more densely populated. Just ask anyone who lived through Lahaina and they
will tell you this is deadly idea.
Grace
From: Mary
Sent: Monday, November 4, 2024 3:49 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I oppose the proposed building in Deer Canyon. If there is a fire fueled by the wind. Many people could loose their lives.
Mary Hovland
Sent from my iPhone
From: Lea Malki
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 8:49 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment on the Proposed Deer Canyon Apartment Project
You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear Anaheim City Council, I am writing to express my serious concerns regarding the proposed 498-unit Deer
Canyon apartment complex in Anaheim Hills. While I recognize the need to address Southern California's
housing challenges, this particular development on the 76-acre wilderness area off Santa Ana Canyon Road
raises several critical issues that would negatively impact our community and environment. 1. Increased Traffic,
Noise, and Pollution: The proposed development would significantly increase traffic on Santa Ana Canyon
Road, directly affecting families who live along or near the route. Currently, the noise and smog from the nearby
91 Freeway already impact residents, and this additional traffic burden would exacerbate the issue, diminishing
our community's quality of life. Our neighborhoods cannot endure the worsening conditions that this
development would impose. 2. Destruction of Local Wildlife Habitat: The Deer Canyon area is home to various
wildlife species, whose habitats would be destroyed by this speculative project. This natural area serves as a
vital sanctuary for these species, and the proposed development would result in the irreversible loss of
biodiversity and disrupt the ecological balance of the region. 3. Loss of Vegetation Benefiting Air Quality: The
vegetation in Deer Canyon plays an essential role in filtering the air, helping mitigate smog from the 91
Freeway. When freeway congestion increases, many vehicles, including heavy trucks, exit on Imperial Highway
and take the winding route through our area to bypass traffic, adding even more pollution. Removing this
vegetation would have direct, adverse effects on air quality for Anaheim Hills residents. 4. Increased Safety
Risks in a High -Risk Zone: Adding nearly 500 units in Anaheim Hills raises serious safety concerns. Our area
sits near the San Andreas Fault, increasing the risk of structural failure and significant danger during
earthquakes. Additionally, Anaheim Hills is at high risk for wildfires, and the increased population density would
complicate evacuation during emergencies, putting lives at risk. Developing in a high -risk area like this is simply
not prudent, as it would likely result in complex and potentially hazardous evacuation scenarios. In light of these
concerns, I urge the City Council to reconsider the Deer Canyon apartment project. The long-term impacts on
traffic, environmental stability, air quality, and resident safety in Anaheim Hills should be prioritized over
speculative real estate interests. Rather than contribute to overdevelopment in a sensitive area, I hope the
Council will focus on sustainable, well -considered solutions that genuinely address the housing crisis without
compromising the integrity of our community. Thank you for considering these comments. I appreciate your
commitment to listening to the voices of Anaheim residents. Sincerely, Lea Malki
From: Debbie Swiontek
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 7:23 AM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer canyon project
[You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I have lived in Anaheim Hills for over 35 years and watched the traffic increase every year to the point of complete
congestion in the streets and on the 91 freeway. It took me two hours to get off the hill during our last wild fire. We
cannot handle any more residences.
Debbie Swiontek
Anaheim Hills
From: michaelmavrovounioti
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 6:50 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CITY COUNCIL, GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Dear fellow citizens, are county facilities still operating under COVID restrictions? The
answer may surprise you.
Sure, county government won't ADMIT that it's keeping some COVID restrictions in
place. It's just calling them something else.
In 2020, OC Animal Care (the county animal shelter under contract to this fair city)
suspended public access. Visits were only by appointment. A lot of shelters did that... but
then returned to normal operation in 2022.
OC Animal Care kept the restrictions in place. It said they made the shelter
safer. Wrong. Read in Voice of OC:
https://voiceofoc.org/2023/11 /mavrovouniotis-the-oc-animal-shelter-lied-about-its-
safety-record-it-needed-an-excuse-to-keep-the-kennels-off-limits-and-ditch-its-strategic-
plan/
Then it changed its tune and said that these restrictions help adoptions. Weird. And
wrong. Read this research study:
https://jsmcah.org/index.php/jasv/article/view/85
For the full report click on the PDF button or:
https://jsmcah.org/index.php/jasv/article/view/85/134
OC Animal Care now open for walk-through visitors for just HALF the hours.
Your city pays the shelter's bills. Your city council can press OC Animal Care for a
complete return to pre-COVID practices.
County government has made a mess of the shelter and keeps you in the
dark. Incompetent managers don't like public scrutiny. Stay informed on OCShelter.com
From: gmose
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:27 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] city council comment on OC animal shelter
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
The city uses the county animal shelter (OC Animal Care), and the taxpayers pay dearly for
the privilege.
The shelter has a Strategic Plan that taxpayers cost the taxpayers $400,000. Is it using
it? No, it's thrown it out of the window:
https://voiceofoc.org/2023/09/mavrovouniotis-how-to-fix-oc-animal-care-use-the-
strategic-plan/
Instead, it wants YOU, the taxpayer to pay a few hundred thousand dollars for a new
one. It's already put this out to bid. Any day now they'll approve a wasteful contract, and
you'll be on the hook.
The city council shouldn't let this happen. They should tell the shelter that the city
ALREADY PAID for a Strategic Plan, and the shelter should just use it.
This is all just an excuse to cover up the misdeeds of incompetent county managers:
https://voiceofoc.org/2024/09/mavrovouniotis-the-oc-animal-shelter-director-is-all-
image-and-no-substance/
Better yet, we should get a non-profit humane society to run the shelter. That's what this
OC Register column says, and I agree with it:
https://www.ocregister.com/2024/09/24/county-managers-failed-our-animal-shelter/
And that's not the half of it. Here's a complete rundown of the shelter's problems:
https://www.ocregister.com/2024/09/24/county-managers-failed-our-animal-shelter/
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Craig A Durfey
[EXTERNAL] Fwd: You are the heart of our work
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Song for Charlie <realtalkObsongforcharlie.orp
Date: Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 2:17 PM
Subject: You are the heart of our work
To:
1
Dear Craig A,
As we enter the season of gratitude and
giving, we want to take a moment to
express how truly thankful we are for you —
our dedicated community of compassionate
supporters. Your unwavering commitment
helps drive our mission every single day.
Together, we reach millions of teens,
families, and communities across the
nation, ensuring they are equipped and
empowered to keep their loved ones safe.
Click below to hear a special message from
our Founders, Ed and Mary Ternan, as they
share their heartfelt appreciation for the
many of you who courageously share your
stories.
You fuel our mission everyday, and we are
so grateful.
Warmly,
Kaila Sassano
Chief Development Officer
M
Im
P.S. Make your Giving Tuesday gift early. Every donation helps young people and families
learn about the dangers of fentanyl and fake pills and how to keep their loved ones safe.
CONNECT WITH US
Z
�FIKXWinj[oJZ�]
Changed your mind? You can unsubscribe any time.
Q
From: Carol Lovato
Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2024 3:19 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Deer Canyon Project
[You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ]
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
Please help us protect our fire evacuation routes from further congestion and dangerous traffic conditions from the
extensive fallout routes surrounding the 91 Freeway in our area. Please prayerfully represent the families who live in this
impacted area.
CarolLovato
Anaheim.92808
From:
Barbara Wahlbrink
Sent:
Monday, November 11, 2024 9:50 PM
To:
Public Comment
Subject:
[EXTERNAL] Thank you City Council Members
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important
Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message.
I am writing to thank the Anaheim City Council for the recent vote against the SALT Project in Anaheim
Hills.
You listened to our very real concerns regarding safety issues as well as our current traffic overload in the
area.
Although the architectural plans were impressive, the facts remain that this location cannot support a
project of this size. Without considerable traffic access improvements, further projects should not be
approved.
Your commitment to serving us is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Barbara Wahlbrink
(Anaheim Hills resident for 39+ years)
Sent from my iPhone