56R-3281
RESOLUTION NO. 3281
,-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING
VARIANCE NO. 531.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of
oertain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
The West 349 feet of the South
10 acres of the Southwest * of
the Northwest t of Seotion 21,
T4S, R10W, S.B.B.& M. (Said
property is looated at 10422
Euclid Avenue, Anaheim.)
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did
hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on April 16, 1956, notioes of whioh said publio hearing were
duly given, as required by law and the provisions of Section
9200.17 of the Anaheim Munioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after
due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 169
-- Series 1955-56 recommending that Varianoe No. 531 be granted
upon the conditions therein set forth; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, written appeals
were filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protest-
ing the aotion of the City Planning Commission granting said
variance, and said appeals were set for publio hearing on May 8,
1956, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as
required by law and. the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the
Anaheim Munioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said
public hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an oppor-
tunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports and
did thereupon state that further investigation would be made
and the matter again considered at a meeting to be held on
May 15, 1956, and did close said hearing; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of
all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find and determine that:
~
1. There is no substantial property
right possessed by other property
in the same vicinity and zone and
denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property
can be adequately developed and used
under the present zone.
-1-
,,-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City
Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City
Planning Commission granting Variance No. 531, requesting
permission to use the above desoribed property for a retail
nursery for the sale of shade plants, potted shrubs, eto.,
be, and the same is hereby, disapproved, and that Variance
No. 531 be, and the same is hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and
signed by me this 15th day of May, 1956.
ATTEST:
~L& ot~~tfO~ ~AJlEIM
'. )
, '.. . >-~---
, -'.-' ;I -""' ""...... '
MEtb1.-~6r{i{c -co~~.
STATE OF CALIFOIDJIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s .
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. DENE M, WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City
of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution
was introduced and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting
provided by law of the City Council of the City of Anaheim,
held on the 15th day of May, 1956, by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry and Wisser
NOES:
C0UNCILMEN: None
AB SENT:
COUNCILMEN: Schutte
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the
City of Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the
15th day of May, 1956.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my
hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim
this 15th day of May, 1956.
~.. ......~ .
'.~ (./~
u RK1f 1liE CITY OF ANAHEIM
.-
A2-