56R-3280
~
,F -
RESOLUTION NO. 3280
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIl1 DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 528.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 16 of Tract No. 601.
(Said property is located at
401 West North Street.)
AND WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission did hold
a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
April 16, 1956, notices of Which said public hearing were
duly given, as required by law and the prOVisions of Section
9200.17 of the Anaheim Munioipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in
its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 166
Series 1955-56 recommending that Variance No. 528 be granted;
and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the
date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was
filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission granting said
variance, and said ap-peal was set for public hearing on May 8,
1956, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said publio
hearing, the City Council d.id duly hold and oonduct suoh
hearing and did give all persons interested therein an oppor-
tunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports and
did thereupon close said hearing and declare that the matter
would be further considered on J1ay 15, 1956; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf. and after due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find and determine that:
1. There is no substantial property right
possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied the subject
property.
;-
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the
present zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
-1-
--
t~
Commission granting Variance No. 528, requesting permission
to complete and use the area over the present garage looated
on the-above-described property for an apartment, be, and the
Same is hereby Qisapproved, and tr~t Variance No. 528 be, and
the same is hereby, denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 15th day of May, 1956.
-. '/')'
. /
(<_-~-/-- //--:1 .-._
MAy"cifor~~---ygF ANAHEll1
ATTEST:
0' . , ~
~"kC )?( /,V --<~~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIlJl
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE 1'1.
Anaheim, do hereby
was introduced and
by law of the City
on the 15th day of
WILLIAY~, City Clerk of the City of
certify that t~~J.oreE9ing resolution
adopted at ~~W'Trleeting provided
Council of the City of Anaheim, held
May, 1956, by the following vote:
AYES: OOUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons and Wisser.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
NEUTRAL: COUNCILl~N: Fry.
ABSENT: COUNCIL~~N: Schutte.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City
of Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 15th
day of May, 1956.
IN \'fITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this
15th day of May, 1956.
L ~,-,,+ '
t~N{ ///. J(../~,<,f--/'-<'4--~-
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
( SEAL)
----
-2-