Loading...
1955-2822RESOLUTION NO. 2822 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 362. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a petition from the owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: (1) Lots 1 to 67, inclusive, of Tract No, 1769, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 66, pages 45 and 46, Miscellaneous Maps, in the Of- fice of the County Recorder of said Orange County; (2) Lots 1 to 94, inclusive, of Tract No. 2286, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 66, Pages 43 and 44 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. (Said property is further described as: Bounded on the north by the Southern California Edison Co, right of way, on the east by South West Street, on the south by Katella Avenue and on the west by Walnut Street, and consists of approximately 40 acres.) AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on the 13th day of June, 1955, notices of which said public hearing were duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 184 Series 1954 -55, denying Variance No. 362 requesting permission to construct a Major Commercial Development, for the reasons set forth in said resolution; and WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty (20) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim re- questing a review of the action taken by said Planning Com- mission, and said appeal was set for public hearing on June 28, 1955 at the hour of 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WH,REAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does find that: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. -1- 2. Such a variance is necessary for the preserva- tion and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property in question. The granting of such a variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. That the granting of such variance will not ad- versely affect the comprehensive general zoning plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the same is hereby, gri ted to MANLEY -KUHNS CORPORA'ION, 512 NORTH LA BREA AVENUE, LOS ANGELES 36, CALIFORNIA, for the construction and use of a Major Commercial Development on the above described property, as requested in Application No. 362, upon the following conditions: 1. That a P -L, PARKING LANDSCAPING ZONE, approxi- mately LSO feet in width, be established along Walnut Street. 2. That the shopping center shall be constructed in accordance with the specific plans submitted to the City Council on June 28, 1955. 3. All engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim shall be complied with, and shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. 4.. A reduction in the number of entrances from Walnut Street, to be determined by the City and the architect employed by Manley -Kuhns Corporation. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner or its heirs, successors or assigns to comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations, and the conditions herein. Said variance is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code unless otherwise specified herein, THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 28th day of June, 1955. ATTEST CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. MAYOR 0r THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SS. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of AnaHeim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted upon a final reading at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 28th day of June, 1955, by the follow- ing vote of the members thereof: AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 28th day of June,`1955. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of June, 1955. (SEAL) AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte, Wisser, and Van Wagoner. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM