Loading...
56R-3164 RESOLUTION NO. 3164 r A RE30LU~ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING A VARIANCE (NO. 492). WHEREAS, the City- Planning Commission of the City of ~~aheim did receive a petition from the property owner and/or agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of OranGe, State of California, described as follows: 'That portion of the hereinafter d.escribed land lying Northeast of the Northeast line of the 40 foot ,3trip of land conveyed to the State of C;alifornia, for the ,')urposes of a freelmy, by Document No. , Cert~fic8te of Title No. 13900: I t q~'... Beginning at a 4" x 4" post standing at a point 20 chains South of the quarter section corner on the North boundary of Section 22, Township 4 South, cLange 10 West, S.B.3.&M.; thence South parallel uith the East and West boundary lines of said Section, 10 chains, 30~ links; thence East parallel with the South boundary of said Section, 10 chains; thence North (at 3.535 chains intersect the center- line of the track of the S.P.R.R. Co.) 10 chains ::,O~ links; thence ~lest o:>arallel with the said North boundary of said Section, (at 5.82 chains intersect center of track of said Railroad Co.) 10 chains to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM all abutter's rights of access in and to said freeway appurtenant to the land abutting said freeway, over and aoross the Northeasterly line of said 40 foot strip of land. Containing 0.441 of an acre of land, more or less. The property is further described as Lying on the east side of South Palm Street and l:id\.;ay Drive. AND~'i}EREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Ci t;'{ Hall in the Ci tj' of Anahe im upon said petition on February 20, 1956, notices of which said public hearing ,,;ere duly [:i ven as rec;ulred. b;y law and the provisions of Section 9200.17 of the Anaheim l,runicipal Code; and i\~EREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, in- vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due conslctera tion of all eviclence ano. reports offered at said he <:'cring , did ado.1t its ResoL1.tion No. 125 recommending tothe City Council of the City of Anaheim that Variance No. 492 be granted upon the conditions stated in said resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council does find that: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the property in- volved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the propert;'{ or class of use in the same vicinit;'{ and zone. /- 2. That such a variance is necessary for the pre- servation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicin- ity and zone and denied to the property in question. -1- 3. That the granting of such variance will not be ma.terially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property ie located. ,--- 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general zoning plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the aotion of the City Planning Commis- sion granting Variance No. 492, requestln~ permission to cut the above described property into thirty-,two (32) R-3, MULTIPLE FM1ILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, be and the same is hereby, sustained, and that Variance No. 492 be, and the same is hereby, granted to JOSEPH A.ABANDONATO, 200 Orange Avenue, Huntington Beach, California, upon the following conditions: 1. The erection of one-story units only on the north tier of the lots. 2. The erection of a suitable fenoe agreeable to the residents living on Winston Road in Tract No. 2637 and the subdivider, between Traot No. 2637 and the subject property. ' J. That the buildings be constructed aocording to plans submitted, entitled, "The Bungalowcraft Co. Dwellings No.2" -- Plans Nos. D-138 and D-146. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner or his heirs, successors or assigns to comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is granted for the term presoribed by the Anaheim Muni- cipal Code unless otherwise specified herein. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 28th day of February, 1956. c. '. / ~) ._, . ~) /:- ~~Y'-O~ ~F ~~ C~T11)FC kN~iE1i'f ATTE ST : ~ / '-- '--, ';,' . / ..};; J/ " ./ . rf~RK 6;; 1tftf ~IM r-. -2- - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) (DUNTY OF OAANGE ) s s. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) -..... I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the for.egoi~g resol~tion was introduced and ~dopted at regular meeting p~vided by law of the City Council of the Ci ty ,of Anaheim neld on the 28th day of Fe}>r.uary, 1956, by the following vot.. AYES. COUNCILMEN. . Pearson, .Fry, Schutte, and Wisser NOES. OOUNCILMEN. None ABSENT. (DUNCI-l.MElh Van Wagol!ler AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed. said resolution on th~ 28th day of February, 1956. IN WIDlESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my Rand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 28th day of February, 1956. ~~taK)t( TIi~~~;~'~; / .---