Loading...
General (03)Date:11/7/2025 5:04:50 PM From:"Craig A Durfey" To: " Subject:[EXTERNAL] Study Finds One Parenting Trait Strongly Reduces Risk of Inte rne t Addiction Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachme nts unle ss you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Study Finds One Parenting Trait Strongly Reduces Risk of Internet Addiction - https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/study-finds-one-parenting-trait-strongly-reduces-risk-of-internet-addiction/ar-AA1Ke3fs? ocid=socialshare Date:11/13/2025 6:11:11 PM From:" Subject:[EXTERNAL] EDUCATION E-BIKE SAFETY PROGRAM WITH SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL INCREASE USAGE. Attachment: SVUSD PRA Response 10.10.25 - Durfey (e-bike).pdf;E Bike PRA Elem slide s.pdf;E Bike PRA Elementary E-Bike Survey - Google Forms.pdf;E Bike PRA Roll Out 24.pdf;E Bike PRA Sticke r Slides.pdf;E-Bike Letter Home 24.25.pdf;E-Bike Letter Home 25.26.pdf;E-Bike Permission Slip 24.25.pdf;E-Bike Permission Slip 25.26.pdf;SVUSD Responsive Records - Durfey (e-bike) (1).zip;SVUSD Responsive Records - Durfe y (e-bike).zip;Subje ct Important Information Regarding E-Bike Safety and Regulations.pdf;201520160AB902_Asse mbly Floor Analysis (6).pdf;201520160AB902_Assembly Floor Analysis (5).pdf;201520160AB902_Assembly Transportation (5).pdf;, E- bikes Friend or Foe. P.pdf; Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachme nts unle ss you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. (P.R.D.D.C.)(P.R.D.D.C.) PARENTS F OR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDRENPARENTS F OR THE RIGHTS OF DEVEL OPMENTAL LY DISABL ED CHIL DREN CRAIG A. DURF EY F OUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C.CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. P.O.BOX 2001 GARDEN GROVE, CA 928 42P.O.BOX 20 01 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92 84 2 SOCIAL EMOTIONALPAWS.COMSOCIALEMOTIONALPAWS.COM FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEYFACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2 40 4 - HONORING U .S. H OU SE OF CON GRESS H2 40 4 - HONORING CRAIG CRAIG DURFEYDURFEY FOR HIS F IG HT AGAINST AU TISM ... Ms. F OR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM ... Ms. L ORETTALORETTA SANCHEZSANCHEZ of California. of Californ ia. h ttps://www.g ovin fo .go v/co nte nt/p kg /CREC-2 00 3-0 3-2 7/p df/CREC-2 00 3-0 3-2 7.p dfhttps://www.go vinfo.g ov/content/pkg/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2 00 3-0 3-2 7.p df new website new website socialemotionalpaws.orgsocialemotionalpaws.org Assembly Transportation CommitteeAssembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Suite 1121020 N Street, Suite 112 Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 PhonePhone (916) 319-2093(916) 319-2093 Senate Transportation CommitteeSenate Transportation Committee State Capitol, Room 405State Capitol, Room 405 Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 651-4121Phone: (916) 651-4121 Senator Tony StricklandSenator Tony Strickland 1021 O Street1021 O Street Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 651-4036(916) 651-4036 Senate Education CommitteeSenate Education Committee 1021 O Street, Room 67401021 O Street, Room 6740 Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 SEDN.committee@senate.ca.govSEDN.committee@senate.ca.gov Phone: (916) 651-4105Phone: (916) 651-4105 Senate Health CommitteeSenate Health Committee 1021 O Street, Room 33101021 O Street, Room 3310 Sacramento , CA 95814Sacramento , CA 95814 SHEA.Committee@senate.ca.govSHEA.Committee@senate.ca.gov Phone: (916) 651-4111Phone: (916) 651-4111 Assembly Education CommitteeAssembly Education Committee AddressAddress 1020 N Street, Room 1591020 N Street, Room 159 Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 PhonePhone (916) 319-2087(916) 319-2087 Assembly Health CommitteeAssembly Health Committee AddressAddress 1020 N Street, Room 3901020 N Street, Room 390 Sacramento, CA 95814Sacramento, CA 95814 PhonePhone (916) 319-2097(916) 319-2097 OCTA BoardOCTA Board 550 S. Main Street550 S. Main Street Orange, CA 92868Orange, CA 92868 (714) 560-6282(714) 560-6282 Assemblyman Tri TaAssemblyman Tri Ta 1021 O Street, suite 5540,1021 O Street, suite 5540, Sacramento CA 95814Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 319-2070(916) 319-2070 Assemblymember Josh LowenthalAssemblymember Josh Lowenthal 1021 O Street, suite 8320,1021 O Street, suite 8320, Sacramento CA 95814Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 319-2069(916) 319-2069 Craig DurfeyCraig Durfey Mayor Stephanie KlopfensteinMayor Stephanie Klopfenstein City of Garden GroveCity of Garden Grove 11222 Acacia Parkway11222 Acacia Parkway Garden Grove, CA 92840Garden Grove, CA 92840 To Whom it may concern.To Whom it may concern. DearDear Mayor Mayor Stephanie KlopfensteinStephanie Klopfenstein Submitting a letter to address E-Bike ,scooter safety education grand jury report E-Bike safetySubmitting a letter to address E-Bike ,scooter safety education grand jury report E-Bike safety opportunity to create school education programs, increase activity Safe opportunity to create school education programs, increase activity Safe Route to School Route to School SafeSafe Routes to School ProgramRoutes to School Program that can provide many additional benefits. Below documentationthat can provide many additional benefits. Below documentation represents examples how implementation can archive change with CA State AB-902 Trafficrepresents examples how implementation can archive change with CA State AB-902 Traffic violations: diversion programs.(2015-2016)violations: diversion programs.(2015-2016) Bicyclists with traffic tickets can now get their fines waived at Southern California’s first bicycleBicyclists with traffic tickets can now get their fines waived at Southern California’s first bicycle traffic safety school in El traffic safety school in El Monte Monte Bicyclists with traffic tickets can now get their fines waived atBicyclists with traffic tickets can now get their fines waived at Southern California’s first bicycle traffic safety school in El Monte – Orange County RegisterSouthern California’s first bicycle traffic safety school in El Monte – Orange County Register .CA State.CA State legislation is required to bring change with school districts to require E-bike training on goinglegislation is required to bring change with school districts to require E-bike training on going activity to include safe route to school increase education mandatory to address the growingactivity to include safe route to school increase education mandatory to address the growing density mobility from housing density limits parking to density mobility from housing density limits parking to increase health improve education fromincrease health improve education from more physical activity .more physical activity . With OTS funding combination a fee attaches to sales from bikes can help offset the increase costWith OTS funding combination a fee attaches to sales from bikes can help offset the increase cost for more education funding, K to purchase fourth grade all kids bike program for more education funding, K to purchase fourth grade all kids bike program teach without biketeach without bike peddles to provide many important benefits such as bike safetypeddles to provide many important benefits such as bike safety Home - All Kids BikeHome - All Kids Bike CA State law AB 902 2015-2016 has had very little attention as no awareness the cost for a ticketCA State law AB 902 2015-2016 has had very little attention as no awareness the cost for a ticket is high requires greater action to offer a diversion education with the is high requires greater action to offer a diversion education with the growing demand places lawgrowing demand places law enforcement resources creating education will offset bad habits providing the cities increaseenforcement resources creating education will offset bad habits providing the cities increase infrastructure separation.infrastructure separation. SB 932 will accelerate green cities, and active transportation will also create an annual grantSB 932 will accelerate green cities, and active transportation will also create an annual grant program to award funding to help cities implement timely and effective short-term program to award funding to help cities implement timely and effective short-term efforts toefforts to mitigate bicycle, pedestrian, and other active transportation. The Act mandates that cities andmitigate bicycle, pedestrian, and other active transportation. The Act mandates that cities and counties begin to implement those plans within two years after the adoption of the new circulationcounties begin to implement those plans within two years after the adoption of the new circulation element.element. https://alcl.assembly.ca.gov/sites/alcl.assembly.ca.gov/files/SB%20932%20%28Portantino%29.pdfhttps://alcl.assembly.ca.gov/sites/alcl.assembly.ca.gov/files/SB%20932%20%28Portantino%29.pdf Mayor Stephanie concerns about the current traffic commissions seems to be cancelled to oftenMayor Stephanie concerns about the current traffic commissions seems to be cancelled to often this been ongoing issues request the council ought to increase this been ongoing issues request the council ought to increase council reports to the Medal ofcouncil reports to the Medal of Honor Bike Trail Pedestrian Trail Park has no signage.Honor Bike Trail Pedestrian Trail Park has no signage. In the upcoming 2025-2026 school year, secondary students who plan to ride e-bikes, bicycles,In the upcoming 2025-2026 school year, secondary students who plan to ride e-bikes, bicycles, scooters and skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This involves scooters and skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This involves completing ancompleting an application form with a parent/guardian, reviewing a safety PowerPoint presentation, and passingapplication form with a parent/guardian, reviewing a safety PowerPoint presentation, and passing an assessment with 100% accuracy. Upon successful completion, students will receive a parkingan assessment with 100% accuracy. Upon successful completion, students will receive a parking permit sticker that must be prominently displayed on permit sticker that must be prominently displayed on their mode of transportation. Helmet use istheir mode of transportation. Helmet use is mandatory, and students must walk their mode of transportation while on school grounds andmandatory, and students must walk their mode of transportation while on school grounds and adjacent sidewalks. The permit process aims to educate students and parents about safety. Byadjacent sidewalks. The permit process aims to educate students and parents about safety. By following these measures, we following these measures, we can ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for all students usingcan ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for all students using these modes of transportation.these modes of transportation. https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikeshttps://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikeshttps://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes https://resources.finalsite.net/videos/t_video_mp4_480/v1725468749/svusdorg/ascfqrnpa1opt7mjxqihttps://resources.finalsite.net/videos/t_video_mp4_480/v1725468749/svusdorg/ascfqrnpa1opt7mjxqi q/SVUSDEBikeSafetyCourse.mp4q/SVUSDEBikeSafetyCourse.mp4 https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikeshttps://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikeshttps://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikeshttps://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes The Temecula Valley Unified School District "Safe Riders" safety course is designed to teachThe Temecula Valley Unified School District "Safe Riders" safety course is designed to teach students the fundamentals of safety and the rules of the road for bicycles, students the fundamentals of safety and the rules of the road for bicycles, electric bicycles (E-electric bicycles (E- Bikes), electric scooters (E-Scooters), and other micromobility devices. Participants will acquireBikes), electric scooters (E-Scooters), and other micromobility devices. Participants will acquire essential riding skills, including emergency maneuvers and proper handling techniques.essential riding skills, including emergency maneuvers and proper handling techniques. The course also covers California laws and regulations specific to bicycles, E-Bikes, E-Scooters,The course also covers California laws and regulations specific to bicycles, E-Bikes, E-Scooters, and micromobility devices, helping students understand their responsibilities and micromobility devices, helping students understand their responsibilities as riders. Throughas riders. Through engaging lessons and practical tips, students will gain the knowledge needed to make informedengaging lessons and practical tips, students will gain the knowledge needed to make informed decisions while riding. By the end of the course, participants will be equipped with the tools to ridedecisions while riding. By the end of the course, participants will be equipped with the tools to ride responsibly and safely in various environments responsibly and safely in various environments https://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/safety-and-security/e-bike-https://www.tvusd.k12.ca.us/safety-and-security/e-bike- safetysafety AB 902, Bloom. Traffic violations: diversion programs.AB 902, Bloom. Traffic violations: diversion programs. Existing law specifies the penalties for a violation of the Vehicle Code or an ordinance or resolutionExisting law specifies the penalties for a violation of the Vehicle Code or an ordinance or resolution adopted under the Vehicle Code, including the imposition of fines, adopted under the Vehicle Code, including the imposition of fines, fees, and forfeitures, andfees, and forfeitures, and imprisonment, as specified. Existing law also specifies procedures related to the imposition ofimprisonment, as specified. Existing law also specifies procedures related to the imposition of those penalties and the disposition of fees, fines, and forfeitures. Existing law provides that a localthose penalties and the disposition of fees, fines, and forfeitures. Existing law provides that a local authority may not allow a person authority may not allow a person who has committed a traffic violation under the Vehicle Code towho has committed a traffic violation under the Vehicle Code to participate in a driver awareness or education program as an alternative to the imposition of thoseparticipate in a driver awareness or education program as an alternative to the imposition of those penalties and procedures, unless the program is a diversion program for a minor who commits penalties and procedures, unless the program is a diversion program for a minor who commits anan infraction not involving a motor vehicle and for which no fee is charged.infraction not involving a motor vehicle and for which no fee is charged. This bill would instead allow any person of any age who commits an infraction not involving aThis bill would instead allow any person of any age who commits an infraction not involving a motor vehicle to participate in a diversion program that is sanctioned by motor vehicle to participate in a diversion program that is sanctioned by local law enforcement.local law enforcement. The bill would eliminate the requirement that such a program charge no fee. The bill would makeThe bill would eliminate the requirement that such a program charge no fee. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changesother technical, nonsubstantive changes The people of the State of California do enact as follows:The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 42005.3 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:SECTION 1. Section 42005.3 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read: 42005.3. (a) A local authority shall not allow a person who is alleged to have committed a traffic42005.3. (a) A local authority shall not allow a person who is alleged to have committed a traffic offense in violation of this code, or an ordinance or resolution adopted offense in violation of this code, or an ordinance or resolution adopted under this code, tounder this code, to participate in a driver awareness or education program or in any other diversion program as anparticipate in a driver awareness or education program or in any other diversion program as an alternative to the procedure required to be followed under this code for alleged violations of thisalternative to the procedure required to be followed under this code for alleged violations of this code.code. (b) This section does not apply to a diversion program sanctioned by local law enforcement for a(b) This section does not apply to a diversion program sanctioned by local law enforcement for a person who committed an infraction not involving a motor vehicle.person who committed an infraction not involving a motor vehicle. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB902https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB902 Grand Jury Re ports | Orange County Grand Jury The Orange County Grand Jury has released several reports, including the 2023-2024 report titled "E-bikes Friend or Foe," which scrutinizes e- bike regulations and safety measures across Orange County. The report highlights the need for consistent ordinances and common- sense rules for the regulation and enforcement of safe E- bike use in all Orange County cities, school districts, parks, and unincorporated areas. The report also emphasizes the importance of education an d safety regulations to mitigate the higher risks of accidents and injuries associated with E-bikes compared to conventional bicycles. Grand Jury Orange County+2 The Grand Jury's findings and recommendations include the establishment of specific regulations, the creation of reporting mechanisms for e- bike accidents and injuries, and the implementation of research and educational programs focused on safe e- bike operation. The report calls for immediate action to strengthen city oversight of E-bike usage, given the recent surge in E- bike usage and the need for comprehensive public safety measures. Grand Jury Orange County+2 For more detailed information and to view the Grand Jury reports, you can visit the Orange County Public Law Library located in the Civic Center Plaza, building #32. electricbikeexplorer.com 11637 The Grand Jury's findingsThe Grand Jury's findings Orange County Grand Jury Blasts Uncoordinated Regulation of E-BikesOrange County Grand Jury Blasts Uncoordinated Regulation of E-Bikes Orange County Grand Jury Blasts Uncoordinated Orange County Grand Jury Blasts Uncoordinated Regulation of E-Bikes Regulation of E-Bikes Anaheim Takes Action: Response to OCAnaheim Takes Action: Response to OC Grand Jury’s E-Bike ReportGrand Jury’s E-Bike Report By Kristina August 29, 2024By Kristina August 29, 2024 The City of Anaheim has officially responded to the Orange County Grand JuryThe City of Anaheim has officially responded to the Orange County Grand Jury (OCGJ)’s 2023-2024 report titled “Friend or Foe,” which scrutinizes e-bike regulations(OCGJ)’s 2023-2024 report titled “Friend or Foe,” which scrutinizes e-bike regulations and safety measures across Orange County. This response was authorized at the cityand safety measures across Orange County. This response was authorized at the city council meeting on August 20, marking a significant step in addressing the issuescouncil meeting on August 20, marking a significant step in addressing the issues raised by the grand jury.raised by the grand jury. Findings and Recommendations from the Grand JuryFindings and Recommendations from the Grand Jury The OCGJ’s report, delivered to Anaheim Mayor Ashleigh Aitken on June 13,The OCGJ’s report, delivered to Anaheim Mayor Ashleigh Aitken on June 13, highlighted three main findings:highlighted three main findings: 1. Confusion Due to Lack of E-Bike Ordinances: A notable inconsistency in e-bike1. Confusion Due to Lack of E-Bike Ordinances: A notable inconsistency in e-bike regulations across cities.regulations across cities. 2. Inconsistent Training and Education: A lack of uniformity in e-bike safety2. Inconsistent Training and Education: A lack of uniformity in e-bike safety education.education. 3. Need for Tracking E-Bike Incidents: Insufficient data on e-bike-related deaths3. Need for Tracking E-Bike Incidents: Insufficient data on e-bike-related deaths and injuries.and injuries. The grand jury made three key recommendations for improving e-bike safety andThe grand jury made three key recommendations for improving e-bike safety and regulation by December 1:regulation by December 1: 1. Establish Specific Regulations: All Orange County cities should develop and1. Establish Specific Regulations: All Orange County cities should develop and implement clear e-bike regulations.implement clear e-bike regulations. 2. Create Reporting Mechanisms: Develop systems for reporting e-bike accidents2. Create Reporting Mechanisms: Develop systems for reporting e-bike accidents and injuries.and injuries. 3. Develop Research and Educational Programs: Implement research and training3. Develop Research and Educational Programs: Implement research and training programs focused on safe e-bike operation.programs focused on safe e-bike operation. Anaheim’s ResponseAnaheim’s Response In her letter dated August 21, addressed to Presiding Judge Maria Hernandez, MayorIn her letter dated August 21, addressed to Presiding Judge Maria Hernandez, Mayor Aitken agreed with all the grand jury’s findings and outlined the city’s plans toAitken agreed with all the grand jury’s findings and outlined the city’s plans to Table of ContentsTable of Contents 1. Findings and Recommendations from the Grand Jury1. Findings and Recommendations from the Grand Jury 2. Anaheim’s Response2. Anaheim’s Response 3. Broader Context: OC Cities’ E-Bike Policies3. Broader Context: OC Cities’ E-Bike Policies 4. UCI’s Approach to E-Bike Safety4. UCI’s Approach to E-Bike Safety 5. Looking Forward5. Looking Forward 5.0.1. Kristina5.0.1. Kristina address the recommendations:address the recommendations: 1. Regulations and Policy Development: The Anaheim Police Department (APD)1. Regulations and Policy Development: The Anaheim Police Department (APD) Traffic Section will collaborate with the Southern California Traffic Officers’Traffic Section will collaborate with the Southern California Traffic Officers’ Association and OCTA to draft a municipal code. This draft is expected to beAssociation and OCTA to draft a municipal code. This draft is expected to be reviewed by the city attorney’s office by the end of August.reviewed by the city attorney’s office by the end of August. 2. Traffic Reporting and Training: The APD will update its traffic reporting policy2. Traffic Reporting and Training: The APD will update its traffic reporting policy to include e-bike violations and document accidents. A training bulletin outliningto include e-bike violations and document accidents. A training bulletin outlining these changes will be distributed to staff by December 1.these changes will be distributed to staff by December 1. 3. Educational Outreach: The city has already begun implementing educational3. Educational Outreach: The city has already begun implementing educational outreach programs. This includes social media campaigns and communityoutreach programs. This includes social media campaigns and community meetings focused on safe e-bike use. Additional efforts will include hosting safemeetings focused on safe e-bike use. Additional efforts will include hosting safe riding clinics and continuing community engagement initiatives.riding clinics and continuing community engagement initiatives. Broader Context: OC Cities’ E-Bike PoliciesBroader Context: OC Cities’ E-Bike Policies The grand jury’s report reveals significant variation in e-bike regulations across the 34The grand jury’s report reveals significant variation in e-bike regulations across the 34 cities within Orange County. The report notes that e-bike usage has surged as a cost[1]effectivecities within Orange County. The report notes that e-bike usage has surged as a cost[1]effective alternative to cars, highlighting the need for comprehensive public safetyalternative to cars, highlighting the need for comprehensive public safety measures. Issues such as riding on sidewalks, against traffic, speeding, andmeasures. Issues such as riding on sidewalks, against traffic, speeding, and unauthorized modifications to bikes have been identified as potential risks.unauthorized modifications to bikes have been identified as potential risks. Survey results from the grand jury show that half of the responding cities do not trackSurvey results from the grand jury show that half of the responding cities do not track e-bike-related injuries or deaths, and all cities acknowledged the lack of posted speede-bike-related injuries or deaths, and all cities acknowledged the lack of posted speed limits for e-bikes. Moreover, only a fraction of cities offer training for e-bike riders,limits for e-bikes. Moreover, only a fraction of cities offer training for e-bike riders, with safety education remaining sporadic.with safety education remaining sporadic. UCI’s Approach to E-Bike SafetyUCI’s Approach to E-Bike Safety In a related note, the University of California, Irvine (UCI) has specific rules forIn a related note, the University of California, Irvine (UCI) has specific rules for motorized scooters and electric skateboards on campus. Students are required tomotorized scooters and electric skateboards on campus. Students are required to walk these devices through the campus core and adhere to an 8 mph speed limit forwalk these devices through the campus core and adhere to an 8 mph speed limit for bikes. Helmets are recommended to reduce head injury risks. The UCI Policebikes. Helmets are recommended to reduce head injury risks. The UCI Police Department (UCIPD) is also active in enforcing these rules and addressing recklessDepartment (UCIPD) is also active in enforcing these rules and addressing reckless usage and speeding.usage and speeding. Looking ForwardLooking Forward The city of Anaheim’s commitment to addressing the OCGJ’s recommendations is aThe city of Anaheim’s commitment to addressing the OCGJ’s recommendations is a positive step toward improving e-bike safety and regulation. As other Orange Countypositive step toward improving e-bike safety and regulation. As other Orange County cities work to align their policies and educational programs with thesecities work to align their policies and educational programs with these recommendations, the goal is to create a safer and more consistent environment forrecommendations, the goal is to create a safer and more consistent environment for e-bike users throughout the region.e-bike users throughout the region. What Do You Think of Anaheim’s New E-Bike Measures?What Do You Think of Anaheim’s New E-Bike Measures? We want to hear your thoughts! Do you agree with the city’s approach to addressingWe want to hear your thoughts! Do you agree with the city’s approach to addressing e-bike safety and regulations? Share your opinions in the comments below, and let’se-bike safety and regulations? Share your opinions in the comments below, and let’s discuss how these changes might impact the community.discuss how these changes might impact the community. If you found this update useful, help spread the word by sharing this article withIf you found this update useful, help spread the word by sharing this article with friends and family. Let’s keep the conversation going and stay informed aboutfriends and family. Let’s keep the conversation going and stay informed about important local developments!important local developments! RELATED CONTENTRELATED CONTENT The Ultimate Guide to Electric Bike Commuting: Tips, Tricks, and GearThe Ultimate Guide to Electric Bike Commuting: Tips, Tricks, and Gear RecommendationsRecommendations Master Your Ebike Ride with Controller TuningMaster Your Ebike Ride with Controller Tuning Is it Legal to Ride an E-bike in Coeur d’Alene?Is it Legal to Ride an E-bike in Coeur d’Alene? The Rise of Pedal Electric Bikes: Revolutionizing the Way We RideThe Rise of Pedal Electric Bikes: Revolutionizing the Way We Ride Affordable Electric Bikes Under $500Affordable Electric Bikes Under $500 Anaheim Takes Action: Response to OC Grand Jury’s E-Bike Report - Electric Anaheim Takes Action: Response to OC Grand Jury’s E-Bike Report - Electric Bike ExplorerBike Explorer City of Anaheim responds to OC Grand Jury e-bike report City of Anaheim responds to OC Grand Jury e-bike report | New University | UC Irvine| New University | UC Irvine The California Office of Traffic Safety’s mission is to deliver traffic safety programs to preventThe California Office of Traffic Safety’s mission is to deliver traffic safety programs to prevent people from being killed and seriously injured in California.people from being killed and seriously injured in California. https://www.ots.ca.gov/https://www.ots.ca.gov/ Safe Routes to School ProgramSafe Routes to School Program Safe Routes to School ProgramSafe Routes to School Program Biking in Palo Alto: A Safe Routes to School History LessonBiking in Palo Alto: A Safe Routes to School History Lesson Biking in Palo Alto: A Safe Routes to School History LessonBiking in Palo Alto: A Safe Routes to School History Lesson Looking Toward the Future with Palo Alto Safe Routes to SchoolLooking Toward the Future with Palo Alto Safe Routes to School Looking Toward the Future with Palo Alto Safe Routes to SchoolLooking Toward the Future with Palo Alto Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to School in East Palo AltoSafe Routes to School in East Palo Alto (16159) Safe Routes to School in East Palo Alto - YouTube(16159) Safe Routes to School in East Palo Alto - YouTube SB 932 will accelerate green cities and active transportationSB 932 will accelerate green cities and active transportation Sacramento, CA – Today, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 932, the Plan for the FutureSacramento, CA – Today, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 932, the Plan for the Future Bill.Bill. SB 932 requires a county or city to identify high-injury streets and intersections in its General PlanSB 932 requires a county or city to identify high-injury streets and intersections in its General Plan and prioritize safety improvements to reduce traffic collisions.and prioritize safety improvements to reduce traffic collisions. SB 932 will also create an annual grant program to award funding to help cities implement timelySB 932 will also create an annual grant program to award funding to help cities implement timely and effective short-term efforts to mitigate bicycle, pedestrian, and other and effective short-term efforts to mitigate bicycle, pedestrian, and other active transportation.active transportation. The Act mandates that cities and counties begin to implement those plans within two years afterThe Act mandates that cities and counties begin to implement those plans within two years after the adoption of the new circulation element.the adoption of the new circulation element. Though California has been leading efforts to create safer streets, traffic deaths have dramaticallyThough California has been leading efforts to create safer streets, traffic deaths have dramatically increased in recent years. In some cities, the most dangerous streets increased in recent years. In some cities, the most dangerous streets and corridors have beenand corridors have been identified, but no plans exist to remedy these deadly situations. In other cases, safety measuresidentified, but no plans exist to remedy these deadly situations. In other cases, safety measures detailed in General Plans are never built.detailed in General Plans are never built. “By putting active transportation safety and access at the center of local planning, SB 932 will“By putting active transportation safety and access at the center of local planning, SB 932 will create more livable communities in California,” said Jared Sanchez, CalBike create more livable communities in California,” said Jared Sanchez, CalBike Senior PolicySenior Policy Advocate. “And mandating planning for safe active transportation is essential to meetingAdvocate. “And mandating planning for safe active transportation is essential to meeting California’s emissions reduction goals,”California’s emissions reduction goals,” The bill’s author, Senator Portantino, said, “This bill is not just about cyclists; it’s about the safetyThe bill’s author, Senator Portantino, said, “This bill is not just about cyclists; it’s about the safety of everyone who ventures into the public right of way. SB 932 of everyone who ventures into the public right of way. SB 932 is an effective way to mitigateis an effective way to mitigate injuries and fatalities. The Governor’s signature on this important public safety bill will yieldinjuries and fatalities. The Governor’s signature on this important public safety bill will yield positive change for our communities.”positive change for our communities.” Marc Vukcevich, Co-Director of State Policy at Streets for All, said, “SB 932 is a transformativeMarc Vukcevich, Co-Director of State Policy at Streets for All, said, “SB 932 is a transformative policy that will require cities and counties to plan for biking and walking policy that will require cities and counties to plan for biking and walking as transportation. This billas transportation. This bill will also have cities address their high injury networks of streets in a time when roadway fatalitieswill also have cities address their high injury networks of streets in a time when roadway fatalities of both drivers and pedestrians are at an all-time high.”of both drivers and pedestrians are at an all-time high.” CalBike and Streets for All are sponsors of Senator Portantino’s Plan for the Future Bill.CalBike and Streets for All are sponsors of Senator Portantino’s Plan for the Future Bill. https://www.calbike.org/governor-signs-sb-932-plan-for-the-future-bill/https://www.calbike.org/governor-signs-sb-932-plan-for-the-future-bill/ SUBJECT: General plans: circulation element: bicycle and pedestrian plans and traffic calmingSUBJECT: General plans: circulation element: bicycle and pedestrian plans and traffic calming plans.plans. SUMMARY: Requires the circulation element of a general plan to include specified contentsSUMMARY: Requires the circulation element of a general plan to include specified contents related to bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans, and provides that failure torelated to bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans, and provides that failure to implement the plans creates a cause of action for victims of traffic violence. Specifically, thisimplement the plans creates a cause of action for victims of traffic violence. Specifically, this bill:bill: 1) Requires the legislative body of a city or county, upon the next substantive revision of the1) Requires the legislative body of a city or county, upon the next substantive revision of the circulation element occurring on or after June 30, 2024, to develop or update the plan for acirculation element occurring on or after June 30, 2024, to develop or update the plan for a balanced, multimodal transportation network, as specified, and to ensure that the planbalanced, multimodal transportation network, as specified, and to ensure that the plan includes bicycle plans, pedestrian plans and traffic calming plans for any urbanized area, asincludes bicycle plans, pedestrian plans and traffic calming plans for any urbanized area, as defined, within the scope of the county or city general plan.defined, within the scope of the county or city general plan. 2) Requires a city or county to begin implementation of the plan within two years of the date of2) Requires a city or county to begin implementation of the plan within two years of the date of adoption of the modified circulation element that includes the bicycle, pedestrian and trafficadoption of the modified circulation element that includes the bicycle, pedestrian and traffic calming plans.calming plans. 3) Requires the modified circulation element to address or include all of the following:3) Requires the modified circulation element to address or include all of the following: a) Use evidence-based strategies intended to eliminate traffic fatalities, with an emphasis ona) Use evidence-based strategies intended to eliminate traffic fatalities, with an emphasis on fatalities of bicyclists, pedestrians, and users of any other form of human-poweredfatalities of bicyclists, pedestrians, and users of any other form of human-powered transportation.transportation. b) Identify safety corridors and any land or facility that generates high concentrations ofb) Identify safety corridors and any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, as defined, and include safety measures specific to those areas.bicyclists or pedestrians, as defined, and include safety measures specific to those areas. c) Establish traffic calming measures around schools and parks, and within business activityc) Establish traffic calming measures around schools and parks, and within business activity districts, as defined.districts, as defined. 4) Requires a city or county to complete implementation of the plan for a multimodal4) Requires a city or county to complete implementation of the plan for a multimodal transportation network and the construction of any related infrastructure within 20 years oftransportation network and the construction of any related infrastructure within 20 years of the date of adoption of the modified circulation element.the date of adoption of the modified circulation element. 5) Provides that a city or county shall have an additional 10 years to complete implementation if5) Provides that a city or county shall have an additional 10 years to complete implementation if the circulation element contains measures that decrease traffic fatalities by at least 20 percentthe circulation element contains measures that decrease traffic fatalities by at least 20 percent within the first 5 years of its implementation period, and the city or county implements thosewithin the first 5 years of its implementation period, and the city or county implements those measures within those 5 years.measures within those 5 years. 6) Provides that a city or county shall not be required to comply with the requirements of the6) Provides that a city or county shall not be required to comply with the requirements of the bill upon making a written finding based on substantial evidence that its failure to complybill upon making a written finding based on substantial evidence that its failure to comply with the requirements of the bill are the result of unforeseen circumstances outside of thewith the requirements of the bill are the result of unforeseen circumstances outside of the control of the city or countycontrol of the city or county Provides that, from January 1, 2024 through January 1, 2028, the failure by a city or countyProvides that, from January 1, 2024 through January 1, 2028, the failure by a city or county to comply with the requirements of the bill creates a cause of action for bicyclists,to comply with the requirements of the bill creates a cause of action for bicyclists, pedestrians and users of any other form of human-powered transportation injured within thepedestrians and users of any other form of human-powered transportation injured within the right of way in a collision with a motor vehicle in a high injury area in any of the followingright of way in a collision with a motor vehicle in a high injury area in any of the following https://alcl.assembly.ca.gov/sites/alcl.assembly.ca.gov/files/SB%20932%20%28Portantino%29.pdfhttps://alcl.assembly.ca.gov/sites/alcl.assembly.ca.gov/files/SB%20932%20%28Portantino%29.pdf Thank youThank you Craig DurfeyCraig Durfey AB 902 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 902 (Bloom and Chiu) As Amended March 26, 2015 Majority vote Committee Votes Ayes Noes Transportation 15-0 Frazier, Achadjian, Baker, Bloom, Campos, Chu, Daly, Dodd, Eduardo Garcia, Gomez, Kim, Linder, Medina, Melendez, O'Donnell SUMMARY: Removes the age limitation on the use of locally adopted diversion programs for Vehicle Code infractions not involving a motor vehicle, allowing such programs to be offered to adults. EXISTING LAW: 1) Prohibits a local authority from allowing a person who is alleged to have committed a traffic offense to participate in a driver awareness or education program or any other diversion program as an alternative to the procedure required to be followed under the Vehicle Code for alleged violations of the Vehicle Code. 2) Exempts from the above prohibition diversion programs for minors who commit infractions not involving a motor vehicle and for which no fee is charged. 3) Specifies the penalties for violations of the Vehicle Code or an ordinance or resolution adopt ed under the Vehicle Code, including the imposition of fines, fees, and forfeitures, and imprisonment. FISCAL EFFECT: None COMMENTS: Under current law, local authorities can establish diversion programs for minors who are charged with moving violations not involving a motor vehicle (e.g., running a stop sign on a bicycle). These programs typically involve waiving or reducing the applicable fine and instead providing education to violators on bicycle and traffic laws, as well as best practices for safe bicycling. Many local governments and police departments have expressed interest over the years in establishing diversion programs for all bicyclists, regardless of age, only to find that current law stands in the way. This bill would remove the limitatio n that these diversion programs only be used for minors. According to the author, "Ticketed cyclists should be allowed to attend a 'bicycle traffic school' class and have their fine reduced, which would turn a purely monetary penalty into a valuable educat ional opportunity, especially for people who would be unlikely to attend a bicycle safety class on their own volition. These programs would also enable bicycling advocates and educators to work directly with local police departments to help clear up common misconceptions about bicycle law and provide guidance on what types of violations should be targeted to have the biggest positive impact on safety." AB 902 Page 2 A recent report from the Governor's Highway Safety Association on bicycle safety found that bicyclist fatalities increased 16% nationwide between 2010 and 2012. California had the highest number of fatalities of any state during that time period at 338. The report additionally noted that in the past 37 years, adult bicycle fatalities have increased from 21% of the total number of fatalities to 84%. Among other recommendations for reducing bicyclist/motor vehicle collisions and the resulting injuries and fatalities, the report recommends "education of bicyclists and motorists about lawful and otherwise appropriate behavior regarding motorist/bicycle interactions." Diversion programs would provide an opportunity for this type of education. Analysis Prepared by: Anya Lawler / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0000191 AB 902 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 902 (Bloom and Chiu) As Amended July 6, 2015 Majority vote ASSEMBLY: 77-0 (April 23, 2015) SENATE: 38-0 (August 20, 2015) Original Committee Reference : TRANS. SUMMARY: Removes the age limitation on the use of locally adopted diversion programs for Vehicle Code infractions not involving a motor vehicle, allowing such programs to be offered to adults. The Senate amendments : 1) Require a diversionary program used by a person to be sanctioned by a local law enforcement entity. 2) Permit a fee to be charged for the enrollment into a diversionary program. EXISTING LAW: 1) Prohibits a local authority from allowing a person who is alleged to have committed a traffic offense to participate in a driver awareness or education program or any other diversion program as an alternative to the procedure required to be followed under the Vehicle Code for alleged violations of the Vehicle Code. 2) Exempts from the above prohibition diversion programs for minors who commit infractions not involving a motor vehicle and for which no fee is charged. 3) Specifies the penalties for violations of the Vehicle Code or an ordinance or resolution adopted under the Vehicle Code, including the imposition of fines, fees, and forfeitures, and imprisonment. FISCAL EFFECT: None COMMENTS: Under current law, local authorities can establish diversion programs for minors who are charged with moving violations not involving a motor vehicle (e.g., running a stop sign on a bicycle). These programs typically involve waiving or reducing the applicable fine and instead providing education to violators on bicycle and traffic laws, as well as best practices for safe bicycling. Many local governments and police departments have expressed interest over the years in establishing diversion programs for all bicyclists, regardless of age, only to find that current law stands in the way. This bill would remove the limitation that these diversion programs only be used for minors. According to the author, "Ticketed cyclists should be allowed to attend a 'bicycle traffic school' class and have their fine reduced, which would turn a purely monetary penalty into a valuable educationa l opportunity, especially for people who would be unlikely to attend a bicycle safety class on their own volition. These programs would also enable bicycling advocates and educators to work directly with local police departments to help clear up common AB 902 Page 2 misconceptions about bicycle law and provide guidance on what types of violations should be targeted to have the biggest positive impact on safety." A recent report from the Governor's Highway Safety Association on bicycle safety found that bicyclist fatalit ies increased 16% nationwide between 2010 and 2012. California had the highest number of fatalities of any state during that time period at 338. The report additionally noted that in the past 37 years, adult bicycle fatalities have increased from 21% of the total number of fatalities to 84%. Among other recommendations for reducing bicyclist/motor vehicle collisions and the resulting injuries and fatalities, the report recommends "education of bicyclists and motorists about lawful and otherwise appropriate behavior regarding motorist/bicycle interactions." Diversion programs would provide an opportunity for this type of education. Analysis Prepared by: Manny Leon / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093 FN: 0001265 Elementary Leadership Meeting 9/18/25 E-Bike Permits ●Currently at the secondary level ●Committee for implementation at the elementary level ●Please complete this e-bike survey 1. Mark only one oval. Yes No 2. Mark only one oval. Yes No 3. Mark only one oval. Yes No 4. Elementary E-Bike Survey Complete the survey below. * Indicates required question Do you currently have students who ride e-bikes or motorized scooters to school?* Are you interested in having your students obtain a permit prior to riding their e- bike to school? * Are you interested in participating in a committee for establishing e-bike permits at the elementary level elementary? * If you are interested in participating in the committee, include your name below. 10/23/25, 1:43 PM Elementary E-Bike Survey https://docs.google.com/forms/d/16aFnxo82q5Kae5rGdxkuVQe1C-ByvZUb1AtJDiEP4r8/edit 1/2 This content is neither created nor endorsed by Google.  Forms 10/23/25, 1:43 PM Elementary E-Bike Survey https://docs.google.com/forms/d/16aFnxo82q5Kae5rGdxkuVQe1C-ByvZUb1AtJDiEP4r8/edit 2/2 AP Supervision Meeting March 7, 2024- Los Alisos Intermediate School Agenda -Welcome Francis Dizon -Health Services -Scenario -Hot Topics -CHKS Overview for new users -New Expulsion Referral and Administrative Statement -E-Bike Permit Party E- Bike Permit Time! -beginning in the 2024-25 school year all secondary students who ride on wheels to school independently will need a permit to park their vehicle on a school site. - List of potential items needed: 1.Letter to Parents via Parent Square this spring and over the summer. 2.Training for students 3.Assessment for students 4.Application for permit 5.Set of regulations for students to follow- heavy lift 6.Permit Stickers AP Supervision August 8, 2024- Welcome Back! Agenda -Breaking the ice -Summer Fun! -Updated Docs -Data -IDT Supplemental Agreements -E–Bike Permits -Handbook Plan -Update SRO List -MTSS SEB -Intake Meetings / Plans for Tier 3 Issues -504 -Committees -Violation Codes E-Bike Permits Sticker Codes La Paz- P001-P100 Los Alisos- A001-A100 RSM-R001-R200 Serrano- S001-S100 ETHS- E001-E250 LHHS- L001-L100 MVHS- M001-M100 SHS- V001-V035 THHS- T001-T450 Dear Students and Parents/Guardians, For the 2024-2025 school year, secondary students who plan to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This permit is a requirement for all secondary students, and it involves several steps to ensure safety of riders. First, students must complete an application form with a parent/guardian. This form signifies an understanding of the rules and expectations regarding the use of these modes of transportation on school grounds. Additionally, students are required to review a safety PowerPoint presentation, and complete an assessment with 100% accuracy. All of the needed information can be found at: https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes Upon successful completion of the application process, students will receive a parking permit sticker. This sticker must be prominently displayed on their mode of transportation. Please note that wearing a helmet is mandatory for all students using these modes of transportation, and they must walk their bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards while on school grounds, including sidewalks adjacent to the school. We emphasize that the primary goal of this permit process is to educate both students and parents about the importance of safety when using these modes of transportation. We strongly encourage parents and students to complete the safety quiz together to reinforce these essential safety practices. It is important to understand that possessing a parking permit is a privilege, not a right. Failure to adhere to the safety rules and behavior expectations may result in consequences outlined in our three-step approach: Violation 1: A verbal warning will be issued by site administration, and parental contact will be made. Violation 2: Loss of permit for 1 week. Violation 3: Loss of permit for 60 days. Students will be required to retake the educational component and assessment before the permit can be reissued. Similar to high school parking permits, these transportation permits will need to be renewed annually. There is no fee associated with obtaining the parking permit, and only one permit per student will be provided. Students may begin to obtain their permits starting Monday, September 9th, and must have completed the process not later than Monday, September 30th. Your school site will be communicating with you when and where the permits will be issued at each specific site. Thank you for your attention to these important safety measures. By working together, we can ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for all students who choose to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school. Sincerely, Justin Stanfield Director, Student Services Dear Students and Parents/Guardians, For the 2025-2026 school year, secondary students who plan to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This permit is a requirement for all secondary students, and it involves several steps to ensure safety of riders. First, students must complete an application form with a parent/guardian. This form signifies an understanding of the rules and expectations regarding the use of these modes of transportation on school grounds. Additionally, students are required to review a safety PowerPoint presentation, and complete an assessment with 100% accuracy. All of the needed information can be found at: https://www.svusd.org/departments/student-support-services/student-services/e-bikes Upon successful completion of the application process, students will receive a parking permit sticker. This sticker must be prominently displayed on their mode of transportation. Please note that wearing a helmet is mandatory for all students using these modes of transportation, and they must walk their bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards while on school grounds, including sidewalks adjacent to the school. We emphasize that the primary goal of this permit process is to educate both students and parents about the importance of safety when using these modes of transportation. We strongly encourage parents and students to complete the safety quiz together to reinforce these essential safety practices. It is important to understand that possessing a parking permit is a privilege, not a right. Failure to adhere to the safety rules and behavior expectations may result in consequences outlined in our three-step approach: Violation 1: A verbal warning will be issued by site administration, and parental contact will be made. Violation 2: Loss of permit for 1 week. Violation 3: Loss of permit for 60 days. Students will be required to retake the educational component and assessment before the permit can be reissued. Similar to high school parking permits, these transportation permits will need to be renewed annually. There is no fee associated with obtaining the parking permit, and only one permit per student will be provided. Students may begin the application process on Wednesday, July 30th and must have completed the process no later than Tuesday, September 30th. Your school site will communicate with you when and where the permits will be issued at each specific site. Thank you for your attention to these important safety measures. By working together, we can ensure a safe and enjoyable experience for all students who choose to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school. Sincerely, Erin Spillane Director, Student Services SVUSD School Transportation Permit Permission Slip- 2024/25 School Year Student Name: _______________________________ Grade: _______________ School Name: _______________________________ Permit Number: ___________________ In the upcoming 2024-2025 school year, secondary students who plan to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This permit is a requirement for all students and involves several steps to ensure safety on campus. Steps to Obtain a Permit: 1. Complete Application Form: ○ Both the student and parent/guardian must complete and sign the application form, indicating an understanding of the rules and expectations regarding the use of these modes of transportation on school grounds. 2. Review Safety Materials: ○ Students are required to review a safety presentation and watch a safety video. 3. Complete Safety Assessment: ○ Students must complete an assessment with 100% accuracy. Upon successful completion of the application process, students will receive a parking permit sticker. This sticker must be prominently displayed on their mode of transportation at all times while on campus. Important Safety Rules: ● Wearing a helmet is mandatory for all students using these modes of transportation. ● Students must walk their bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards while on school grounds, including sidewalks adjacent to the school. Consequences for Violations: 1. Violation 1: ○ A verbal warning will be issued by site administration, and parental contact will be made. 2. Violation 2: ○ Loss of permit for 1 week. 3. Violation 3: ○ Loss of permit for 60 days. Students will be required to retake the educational component and assessment before the permit can be reissued. By signing below, we acknowledge and agree to follow the rules and expectations outlined above. Student Signature: _______________________________ Date: ______________________ Parent/Guardian Signature: _______________________________ Date: _______________ SVUSD School Transportation Permit Permission Slip 2025/2026 School Year Student Name: ID#: School: Grade: In the upcoming 2025-2026 school year, secondary students who plan to ride bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards to school must apply for a permit. This permit is a requirement for all students and involves several steps to ensure safety on campus. Steps to Obtain a Permit: 1. Complete Application Form: ○ Both the student and parent/guardian must complete and sign the application form, indicating an understanding of the rules and expectations regarding the use of these modes of transportation on school grounds. 2. Review Safety Materials: ○ Students are required to review a safety presentation and watch a safety video. 3. Complete Safety Assessment: ○ Students must complete an assessment with 100% accuracy. Upon successful completion of the application process, students will receive a parking permit sticker. This sticker must be prominently displayed on their mode of transportation at all times while on campus. Important Safety Rules: ● Wearing a helmet is mandatory for all students using these modes of transportation. ● Students must walk their bikes, E-bikes, scooters, or skateboards while on school grounds, including sidewalks adjacent to the school. Consequences for Violations: Violation 1: ○ A verbal warning will be issued by site administration, and parental contact will be made. Violation 2: ○ Loss of permit for 1 week. Violation 3: ○ Loss of permit for 60 days. Students will be required to retake the educational component and assessment before the permit can be reissued. By signing below, we acknowledge and agree to follow the rules and expectations outlined above. Student Signature: Date: Parent/Guardian Signature: Date: OFFICE USE ONLY Permit Number: ___________________ Vehicle Type: ___________________ Color: ___________________ Brand: ___________________