Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1950-1718
1I 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9~ RESOLUTION TdO. ~x A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AI~IAHEIr~ ACKNOT~~~LEDC7ING RECEIPF.C OF A PETITION FOF. 1I'~~ Ai~;I'?EXATION OH' CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO TI-IE CT Y OF .~'~AHETP~I GIVING TdOTTCE OF SUCH PROPOSED ANN~XATTUN, DESCRIBIPSG TIIE I3ULINDARIES OF THE TERRITORY PROPOSED 10 BE AP?i~?EXED Ai~D GIVING- r~SOTICE OF '~i'HE DAY, HOUR AND PLACE VdHEP~E Ai~iD ~,TI~EN ANY PERSON O~~,NTivG READ PROPERTY ?^~TTIiTN SUCH TERFtTTORY SO PROPOSED TO BE Ai~tNEXED T~IAY APPEA}~~ BEFORE THE CITY COU?vCIL ATrD SHG~~T CAUSE T':HY SUCH TERRITO~.Y SHOULD NOT BE ANNEXED TO THE CI`!'Y. OF AI°TAHr~IIl1. ~StHr,I~~AS, the City Council of file City of Anaheim cid the loth day of January, 1954, receive a wrj.tten petition as'~.ing t la II 11 I2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 certain neu~ territory described in said ~:aetition be annexed to the Citsr of An~,.heim, and ~;'IiE~ EAS, said territory proposed to be anr:exed to said City of Anaheim is situated in the County of Orange, State of Cali- forma, and is contiguous to the City o" Anaheir>i a.nd is uninhabited territory, ~vnd said ;_,etition contained a description of ~>~id terri- tory in ;,~rords and figures as hereino.fter in this --Y~:esolution de- scribec_, and T~IHEREAS, the Gity Council finds from evidence and re- ports received that at tl~e time of the ~'i13ng and receipt of said petition, it s~.as aizd ~-~o u~1 is si~,:.ed by o~~~ners of not less than one- fourth (~: } of the area and not less than one-fourth (~) of the assessed valuation of the lan~_ in ~uc11 territory proposed to be ~,~nnexed, ~~.ecordin~; to the last preceding equalized county assessmen ~ roll , <nd Z7HE`-~;EAS, the Cit,r C~~uncil ~'inas front evidence and repo t s received and from so.ic_ petition ;;h~.t C.t the time o-`' the 'ilin~~; ~-~nd ~aresentation of said ~~etition that said near territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim aid r_ot foY'Iil apart of any munici- x~al corporation ~,nd that said territory w~~~s uninh~-~:pited and is Conti E uous to the City of An~~heim, ~a.nd ?~;HEREAS, the City Council finds from said petition and eviaer~ee and reports received that the bound~;~,ries of ti~te territory -1- 1~ 2 3 4i 5 6 7 8 9 ZO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 so proposed to 'rye ~ry~nnexed to t.le City of Anaheim are as follot,~rs, to T.rit A tract of l~.nd including a portion of Lot 2~ of Anaheim Extension, as shown on a ;nap of a survey :m~.de by r~~rilliam Hamel in 1868 and filed in Book j, pages 162 - 164 of Maps, f~ecords of Los Angeles County, ~.lso a portion of South Los An~_;eles Street, otherwise knoUrn as~ U. S. High- way 101, a portion of East Vermont Avenue (formerly Froad Street) and a portion of South Olive Street also known ~.s the Soutr.ern Pacific Railro~;.d right-of-~r~ray, in the County of" Orange, State of Calif'orni~y., and more ;~ar- ticul<:.rly described ws follotrrs: Beginning at the corner of the present city limits of tree City of Anaheim on the northerly line of East Ver- mont Avenue and tree easterly line of South Olive Street; thence westwardly ~.1ong ti_e preset city lirrlit line and along the north line of East l,~ermont A~-enue to the nortn.- -~rest corner of to:e intersection of said East Ve?°~:iont Avenue an~~ South Los Angeles Street, otherwise known as U. S. High~ray 101; tl~enee Sout'n.y~rardly along t~.e westerly line o~' saiu. South Los Angeles Street to t:rie s outh6•,rest corner of the intersection of s~~.id Los Angeles Street arld East ~f eriront Avenue; thence continuing South~~~ardly along t?e westerly line of saki.. South Los An~,e1_es Street, othert~ise r~~no„-n as U. S. T~iighway 101, a distance of 107'x.35 :.Feet, more or less to a point; thence N-74°-1~'- 4;"-E along; the sout?~_erly line of the northerly 30 acres of` Jail i:ot 2j a dista~.ce of 1231.45 feet, mare or less, to a point on the easterly lire of South Olive Street also known as the Southern P~~.cific "=.ailroad ri`•ht-of-Dray; the=ice T~lorth.nr~~rdly J.lor~~~ t•he easterly line of said South Olive Street a distance of 11~1.3~ feet, more or less, to the point of ~beginnin~;. NOUT, THEPuEFOT~~E IIE IT nESOLVED BY ~'HE CITY COUNCIL OF 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 THE CITY OF Ai~GAHEIT~I: That such ~~roposed annexation be designated as SOUTH LOS AI'LTGELES STF~EET ANNEXATION and tT~at notice of such proposed annexation be and the s~~me is ::~:~.ereby Liven, and BE IT FUT~.THER ?ESOLVED that the 14th day of February, 1850, at the hour of 8:00 o'clock P. ICI., at the City Council ChaMber in the City Hall of t'r_e City af' A~~a.heim, be end tl~~e same is hereby fixed ~,.s ty:e day, hour and place T~~hen ar~d where any per- son ovrr~ing real property >rithin said.. territory so proposed to be annexed, and. having.; ~~ny ob jeetiona to the proposed annexation, c~ay appear before the City Council of the City of Arsaheim and show cause ~~rhy such territory should not ae so ~.nnexed; that ~:~11 pe-rsons -2- 11 2~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I5 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? 28 29 30 31 32 r?avin~ any objections to such prooosed annexation are hereby notifi to appear on s~.id d~:.y at sai.c~. hour and nlaee to shay; cause, if any they have, v~hy such territory should. not ~~e so annexed, and BE IT F`URTi~ET~ F~ESOLVED that the City Cle~~~h. be and he is hereby ~Guthorized <~.nd directed to i~ublish or cause a copy of thi Resolution to be ~,_~ublished at least once a ti~eeTi. f'or t~~o successive weesLs =:~rior to the lath dewy of ~'ebru~•~ry, 195, in the Ar:~,heim i3ulletin, ~. ne~tifspaoer of ~;encral circulation, x~ublis}red in the City of An~.hei~, County of Oran~-~` , State o~' Cali;'orni<r.. THE ~~'OREGOITJG ~.ESOLUTION i s sunned and ap ~~ roved berme tnis /~ day of January, 190. _~ ATTEST: CTT RK Ul4 Ta+~ C Or A11Ai~EITUT i '- 1I 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I2 I3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 '. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COU~;TY OF' GRAivGE ) ss. CITY GF A~VAFEIR~ ) I, CHArZLES E. GRIFFITH, City CIerI~ of the City of Anah im, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution eras ;:gassed and adoptea. at a regular meeting of tl~~e City Council. of th.e Cit~T of Anaheim, h©I c.+ on the 10th day of January, IgjO, by the f'olloTftirin~; vote of tl~ie members thereof AYES: COUNCILiEi~; Pee,rson, Heying and Boney NOES: COUNCILT~i7EN: None ABSEI`ST: COtJ1ICILIs1ES~: Pace and Va.n 1'~'aganer Ant I further certify that the ~•3ayor o~~' t.Cie C-! ty of An~~heim signed anti approved said Resolution on the 10th c~~.y of January, 1~,~0. IN s~~ITTSESS ~^TI-iERL1~~OF, I have hereunto set my hand~.nd affix>ed tine se~.l of said City of Arzs,heim tr~is i0th d~vy of January, ~.~; j0. ~. C.~T E OF w'I~E ~ GF A~~iAHEIM -~-