The URL can be used to link to this page

10/28/2025ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 285 2025 The regular meeting of October 28, 2025 was called to order at 3:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on October 23, 2025, with a revised agenda posted on October 24, 2025. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Natalie Meeks, Ryan Balius, and Norma Campos Kurtz. Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Natalie Rubalcava, and Kristen M. Maahs joined the meeting during Closed Session. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Jim Vanderpool, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None CLOSED SESSION: At 3:31 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to Closed Session for consideration of the following: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 54956.9): One potential case (A copy of the claim against the City is included in the agenda packet and available for review by contacting the City Clerk's Office and on-line electronically with the agenda at: www. anaheim. net/councilagendas.) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR (Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Management (IBEW) At 5:04 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Natalie Meeks, Ryan Balius, Carlos A. Leon, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, and Kristen M. Maahs INVOCATION: Pastor Tim Eaton, Zion Lutheran Church FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Natalie Rubalcava City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 2 of 32 Without objection, Mayor Aitken took the presentations out of order and requested to move forward with the presentation by Orange County Board of Supervisors Doug Chaffee. PRESENTATIONS: Presentation by Orange County Board of Supervisors Doug Chaffee Supervisor Doug Chaffee with the -Orange County Board of Supervisors provided a presentation on the third Gun Buyback Program. He shared that the first was held in the City of Placentia, the second in Anaheim, and the third would be held in Garden Grove and sponsored by himself and Supervisors Vicente Sarmiento and Janet Nguyen. He reported that the event will take place on Saturday, November 8th, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. He explained that individuals would transport their unwanted weapons in the trunks of their vehicles, enter the drive-thru and open their trunks, and an officer would remove the weapon and inspection. He added that individuals receive gift cards for their weapons and receive a free gun lock. He noted that there is a separate program dedicated to distributing gun locks. He shared that residents can visit to request a lock. He presented a video showing the buyback program that took place in Anaheim. He explained that $300 gift cards are issued for assault weapons and $100 for other weapons offered. Supervisor Chaffee reported that 757 weapons were collected from the first two buybacks. He shared that Attorney General Rob Bonta attended one of the buybacks. He thanked the Mayor and City Council for their support and the Police Department for their work at last year's event. Council Member Balius inquired about the process for individuals turning in illegal assault weapons and if they would be questioned. Supervisor Chaffee reported that the event is anonymous and the weapons would be destroyed. Recognizing the 25th Anniversary of Country Family Cafe Mayor Aitken recognized the 251h Anniversary of Country Family Cafe, located in West Anaheim. She shared that they are known for their warm hospitality and home -style cooking. She highlighted founders Javier Torres and Blanca Camacho de Torres, who were later joined by Ricardo Camacho Nunez. She shared that the cafe continues to honor Mr. Torres' legacy by serving comfort food and kindness in every meal. Jimena Torres and family accepted the recognition. Ms. Torres, on behalf of her family, expressed her gratitude for the recognition. She shared that following her father's passing, the community continued to support the cafe and keep her father's legacy alive. She explained that the recognition is proof that her father's hard work and her family's dedication has not been forgotten. She expressed her pride for growing up in the restaurant and recognized the effort and sacrifice her family put into the restaurant. She thanked the City of Anaheim and the whole community for supporting the restaurant. Recognizing the 40th Anniversary of the Girl Scouts Troop at Orange County Buddhist Church and its founding leader, Judy Koyama Mayor Aitken recognized the Girl Scouts Troop at Orange County Buddhist Church for 40 years of leadership, creativity, empowerment, volunteerism, and confidence. She shared that the values continue to shape strong, young women each year. She recognized the Girl Scouts of Orange County, the Girl Scouts, their families, and the dedicated leaders who guide them. Judy Koyama, Founder of the Girl Scouts Troop at Orange County Buddhist Church, accepted the recognition. On behalf of the Orange County Buddhist Church Girl Scouts, Ms. Koyama thanked the City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 3 of 32 City Council. She highlighted Girl Scouts of Orange County CEO Vikki Shep, parents, and the Girl Scouts for the troop's success. CEO of Girl Scouts of Orange County Vikki Shep highlighted the celebration at the church site and the legacy and leadership of the troop. She shared that the troop has a high number of Gold Award Girl Scouts. She thanked the City Council for the recognition. Recognizing October 2025, as National Community Planning Month Mayor Aitken recognized October 2025 as National Community Planning Month, a time to recognize and celebrate the vital role planning professionals play in shaping the future of the City. She highlighted the work of the Planning and Building Department. She noted that their work extends to creating spaces that improve the quality of life in Anaheim, from facilitating growth and expanding businesses. On behalf of the City Council, she thanked the Planning and Building Department for its dedication and service. She noted that the team was recently recognized by National Planning Associations. Director of Planning and Building Heather Allen recognized the team of talented and dedicated professionals for planning services and business licenses. She introduced the new Deputy Director of Planning and Building, Joanne Hwang, who would be leading the Planning Services division. Recognizing the Anaheim Housing Authority's 50th Anniversary Mayor Aitken reported that the Anaheim Housing Authority has stood at the heart of the City's commitment to helping neighbors find safe, stable, and affordable housing. She noted that the work is about the people and families that are assisted. She shared that the Anaheim Housing Authority has helped thousands of Anaheim residents find homes, thanks to the dedication of the Housing Authority's team, along with community partners, landlords, and developers. She thanked staff, past and present, who served the mission with kindness and compassion, and community partners. Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter thanked the Mayor and the City Council, past and present, for supporting the Housing Authority's work. She shared that the Housing Authority's story is the story of the people. She explained that staff have shown what it means to serve with compassion, passion, and resilience. She added that housing work involves listening, problem -solving, advocacy, and providing a steady presence for families experiencing difficult times. She shared that employees show up each day with commitment, empathy, and determination. She thanked the Housing and Community Development team, past and present, for their dedication, which has shaped thousands of lives that have benefited from the programs and strengthened the fabric of Anaheim. She thanked those who have served on the Anaheim Housing Authority Board, past and present, and the City Council for their support and innovation in funding opportunities. Presentation by OC Family Justice Center Tracy Theodore, Executive Director, OC Family Justice Center, reported that the Family Justice Center is located in Anaheim and provides resources for survivors of family violence, including child abuse, domestic violence, sexual assault, and elder and dependent adult abuse. She shared that October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. She reported that there are 15 agencies at the Center, including the Anaheim Police Department. She expressed gratitude for the Police Department's leadership and their continued support and the City Council's for providing important resources to those experiencing difficult traumas. She reported that there are 15 agencies on -site that provide various resources from therapy and counseling to financial support to emergency housing assistance. She shared that the collaboration makes the work possible and provides a cohesive place City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 4 of 32 and support for survivors. She introduced new Lieutenant at the Family Justice Center, Daniel Gonzalez, who will be leading efforts. She shared that the Center hosts two resource fairs to encourage the community to learn. She added that another fair would be held in April for Child Abuse Awareness Month, as well as Sexual Assault Awareness Month. She shared that the Center is hoping to partner with the City Council for resource events moving forward. She announced that December 18th is the Center's Annual Adopt a Family event, from 2 p.m. to 7 p.m., and invited the public to attend. She noted that there are 120 families and over 550 individuals that the Center would be adopting. She thanked the City Council for its support. Mayor Aitken requested a flyer for the event to share on social media. ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS To be presented at a later date): Recognizing October 19 - 25, 2025, as County of Orange Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week Recognizing October 19 — 25, 2025, as National Friends of the Library Week ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA: City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that staff requested to continue Public Hearing Item No. 28 to the Council meeting of December 9, 2025. PUBLIC COMMENTS all agenda items. including Agenda Item No. 26, regarding the proposed modification to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District): Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of fourteen (14) public comments were received electronically prior to 1:30 p.m. related to City Council agenda items and matters within the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Council. [A final total of fourteen (14) public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official record]. — See Appendix. Duane Roberts shared his quote from a July 2015 article on a gate tax for Disney Parks admissions, which he concluded would not be used for parks, housing, or social services. He explained that his prediction has come true, with most new revenue funding the expansion of the Anaheim Police Department, including a proposed $350 million new Police headquarters. He suggested that the Council work toward raising minimum wage or adopt a rent control ordinance that would improve the lives of residents compared to a gate tax. R. Joshua Collins criticized the City's homeless situation and the waitlist for Section 8 vouchers. He shared that 3,000 households are on the waitlist, and over 4,000 households are specifically waiting for affordable housing options. He reported that on October 11th, City Net informed him that there were no beds available and increased seniors on the streets. He requested that the City Council agendize a discussion to prevent seniors from ending up on the street. He read a bible verse and encouraged the City Council to prioritize basic needs. Sabrina Lockhart, Executive Director of the California Attractions and Parks Association, urged the City Council to reject the gate tax proposal. She explained that the proposed measure is short- sighted and risks crippling economic growth in the City. She shared that the Disneyland Resort is a long-standing partner and economic engine, generating $279 million in annual tax revenue and supporting 36,000 jobs in the City. She reported that Visit California has forecasted a decline in visitation since the pandemic due to the rising cost of living. She explained that a gate tax puts the State at a competitive disadvantage. She shared that long-term fiscal stability demands policies that encourage investment and not penalize it. She added that the tax does not only impact visitors, with City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 5 of 32 1/3 of Anaheim residents visiting the park. She shared that the City's past strategic investments have delivered results, and requested that the City Council continue the visionary leadership that prioritized economic growth and strengthened tourism. Justin Hart, General Manager of the Sheraton Park Hotel at the Anaheim Resort, thanked the City Council for its leadership in advancing the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District's (ATID) affordable housing initiative. He requested the Council's consideration regarding the funding formula and encouraged the Council to consider a 50/50 distribution between the marketing fund and the transportation fund. He explained that the marketing fund is essential to generating the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and the ATID, along with a return of investment of 40 to 1. Vern Nelson expressed his support for the gate tax proposal. He shared that the tax is a tourism tax and Anaheim residents should be exempt, adding that residents would be more supportive if they were exempt. He explained that residents endure the nightly fireworks, noise, traffic, and pollution. He added that residents have subsidized Disney and should not pay a tourism tax. He reported that the threshold of 20,000 attendees would only apply to Disney and suggested that the threshold apply to venues of 10,000. He urged the City Council to place the item on the ballot. Gabby Sutter, Executive Director of the Anaheim Police Association, provided background on the Disneyland Resort expansion and taxpayer financed parking structure for Disney. She shared that in return for the parking structure, Disney built a second theme park, Downtown Disney, and new hotels. She explained that although the City attracts more than 30 million visitors a year, more than 40% of visitors do not stay in Anaheim. She added that funding from hotels does not cover public safety or other General Fund needs. She reported that funds from 1 % sales tax are diverted from the General Fund to pay toward the expansion. She shared the Police Association's support of Item No. 27, allowing Anaheim voters to decide, and urged the City Council to place the item on the ballot. Breana V. Castro, Anaheim Police Officer, thanked Council Member Rubalcava for requesting Item No. 27. She explained that residents were promised that when the Disneyland and Resort expanded, taxes from tourism would fund City services instead of residents. She explained that the public is not anti -Disney or anti -visitor, but the benefits to the Resort are not equal with residents. She shared that the Anaheim Police Department is severely understaffed and other public service programs require funding. She urged the City Council to place the item on the ballot and allow residents to vote on a gate tax. Tony Lee, Vice President of the Anaheim Police Association, noted how City services are impacted by supporting the Resort District. He explained that the Disneyland Resort requires a level of public service unlike any other city, and is pulling resources away from neighborhoods and residents. He shared that Anaheim Police Officers worked more than 90,000 hours at the Disneyland Resort property in 2024. He added that those hours do not include staff time at Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the Convention Center, and other venues throughout the Resort District. He reported that the Police Department is severely understaffed and continuously covers Resort demands through mandatory overtime, resulting in officers becoming overworked, weary, stressed, and fatigued. He emphasized that the Police Department is committed to protecting residents, neighborhoods, businesses, and the City's visitors. He concluded that the Anaheim Police Association strongly supports placing the tax measure on the ballot for the voters. Cesar Aguilar, Anaheim Police Officer, echoed previous comments about the toll understaffing takes on officers. He shared that the Anaheim Police Association supports Item No. 27 to place an admission tax on the ballot. He reported that only a small portion of the 30 million annual visitors stay in the City. He shared that estimates suggest that 10 million visitors generate $0 for Anaheim. He noted that a tourism tax would not drive away visitors, as rising prices have not affected the park's attendance. He cited an article that only 75,000 Anaheim residents visit the park annually and a gate City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 6 of 32 tax would largely impact visitors. He urged the City Council to let Anaheim residents vote on the measure. Mike Robbins reported a history of staffing concerns at the Police Department. He commented on the City's financial concerns including repeated budget deficits and use of one-time funds. He shared that a 3% tax on Disneyland prices and parking fosters the potential for a balanced budget and increased infrastructure. He compared the number of fire stations and emergency response times in Anaheim to those in other cities. He added that the City's park score is 81 out of 100 among large cities. He explained that a 3% tax would support public safety, City services, and balance the City's budget. Jeanine Robbins commented on recent news articles alleging corruption among City staff. She referenced past allegations of corruption and mismanagement, highlighting the lack of accountability. She requested additional oversight and review on Finance Department items. She criticized the Mayor's article on the proposed gate tax. She explained that the City is in a budget deficit and relied on borrowed money to balance the budget. She emphasized that residents have the right to vote on the measure. Ivon Pena, Interim Co -Executive Director at OCCORD, urged the City Council to place the proposed admissions and parking tax measures on the November 2026 ballot and allow residents the opportunity to vote. She shared that corporations have benefited from City resources while parks have not been repaired, and housing has become less affordable. She highlighted potential revenues of $160 million each year from gate and parking taxes. She reported that OCCORD's support of the measure urges the Council to allocate new revenue to the community for housing, green spaces and parks, libraries, and infrastructure improvements. She noted that the cities of Seattle, Cleveland, and Chicago have adopted similar taxes. She urged the City Council to place the measures on the 2026 ballot. Angeles Ochoa, Digital Organizer at OCCORD, reported that families feel the strain of the City budget failing to meet basic needs. She emphasized the importance of an admission and parking tax. She explained that Anaheim's largest entertainment venues benefit from the City's roads, public safety, and everyday labor of residents. She shared that revenues from a gate tax and parking tax could generated $160 million per year in revenue. She emphasized that potential funds should be invested into the community for housing, public spaces, and strong youth programs over policing. She added that while opponents argue tax measures would lead to higher ticket prices, ticket costs have already been increasing. She noted that the cities of Seattle, Cleveland, and Chicago have adopted similar taxes. She urged the City Council to place the measures on the 2026 ballot. Randy Wetmur expressed his opposition to the admissions tax due to rising costs of living. He stated that people would choose to visit other areas to save on costs. He encouraged the City to work with Disney to find an alternative. Henry Hillebrecht, representing 1,100 plumbers and steamfitters in Southern California and Orange County, expressed opposition to the proposed gate tax. He shared that the union partners with Disney and will not support the gate tax. James McDaniel, with Aimbridge Hospitality, urged the City Council to oppose a gate tax. He explained that the employees of the Clementine Hotel and Suites rely on visitors and tourists. He shared that a gate tax would result in families choosing to vacation elsewhere, resulting in fewer visitors, less Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT), and sales tax. He encouraged the City Council to oppose the gate and parking tax measures. Erika Gomez, General Manager at the Cortona Inn & Suites, urged the City Council to oppose a gate tax. She explained that a gate tax would make visiting the City more costly. She shared that City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 7 of 32 Cortona's employees depend on tourism and that new taxes would jeopardize jobs and result in lower TOT revenues. Danny Fierro, with the Orange County Hotel and Lodging Association, spoke in opposition to Item No. 27. He explained that a gate tax would impact the Resort and set a precedent for future increases. He added that a gate tax would impact hotels because visitors would be inclined to save on hotel rooms and stay in neighboring cities. He urged the City Council to oppose the item. Doug Mangione, on behalf of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Local 441 expressed opposition to a proposed gate tax. He shared that IBEW has partnered with the Disneyland Resort since 1956 and represents over 200 ride maintenance workers. He noted that the tax targets one company although it is advertised as Citywide. He questioned whether one company is responsible for Citywide safety and services. He requested that the City Council reconsider the item. Wes Jones encouraged the Mayor and City Council to investigate accusations alleged by a former City employee. He urged the City Council to place a gate tax measure on the ballot for voters to decide. William O'Connell, Visit Anaheim Board Member, encouraged the City Council to support a 50/50 split distribution between the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) Marketing Fund and the Transportation Fund. He shared that the Resort community commends the Council's leadership in modifying the funding formula to provide resources for Resort workers without increasing visitor costs. He reported that Visit Anaheim is open to collaborating with the City on solutions, but cautioned against imposing long-term taxes to address short-term shortfalls. He explained that with new projects like Disneyland Forward and OCVIBE, the City would see significant financial benefits in the upcoming budget years. He stated that an additional tax will cause further tourism fluctuations and cause investors and travelers to reconsider Anaheim. He urged the City Council to oppose the proposed tax measures. Cindy Marquez reported that Disneyland Resort workers would be the most affected by a gate tax. She explained that park visitation is down, causing staffing reductions and shortened work hours. She urged the City Council to oppose a gate tax. Charlie Carnow with UNITE HERE! Local 11 urged the City Council to oppose Item No. 15. He explained that the City should not create exemptions or promise public resources to private interests. He challenged the financial benefits the Olympics would have on Anaheim and cited a fiscal impact study from the City of Santa Monica. He questioned the reimbursement rates and levels of service, which were not outlined in the agreement or staff report. He added that the agreement prevents Anaheim from taking legal action against the Olympic Committee, the City of Los Angeles, and the State for appropriate reimbursement. Andrea Romero with UNITE HERE! Local 11 questioned whether workers would choose to work in Anaheim for the Olympic Games due to labor standards. She added that the agreement does not include local hire requirements. She encouraged the City Council to oppose the agreement. Austin Lynch with UNITE HERE! Local 11 highlighted two employees from the Convention Center and Angel Stadium, with over 55 years of combined service. He spoke in support of the contract renewal with Aramark to continue providing services at the Convention Center. He highlighted the strong partnership with Aramark and a contract that provides family health care, pension benefits, and a legal plan. He urged the City Council to support Item No. 14 City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 8 of 32 Elizabeth Galindo with UNITE HERE! Local 11, (translation: Spanish), urged the City Council to oppose the Olympic Games agreement. She explained that the agreement does not include information on reimbursement and questioned the fiscal impact on the City. S. Mercadante commented on the City's $60 million budget deficit compared to Disney's annual revenue. She shared that a 10% on the Mickey and Friends parking structure would generate $15 million per year for public services, including parks, libraries, and public safety. She referenced the City of Avalon's 4% entertainment tax and encouraged the City to implement a tax with an exemption for Anaheim residents. She commented on the proposal's exclusion of the Honda Center and the influence of private interests. She expressed concern over the Mayor's op-ed on the proposed taxes and potential conflicts of interest. She urged the City Council to approve the gate tax. Jose Duran, President of the Anaheim Police Association, expressed support for placing entertainment tax and parking tax measures on the ballot. He cited the high daily demand for public safety and infrastructure and understaffing in the Police Department. He stated that despite receiving TOT from hotel stays, many park visitors do not stay overnight and therefore do not contribute to the TOT. He stated that the tax measures would support residents, safer streets, parks, improved infrastructure, and housing resources. He urged the City Council to vote in support of placing the measures on the November 2026 ballot. John Baca with IBEW, Local 47, urged the City Council to place the measures on the ballot for the voters to decide. Kenneth Batiste commented on the City's financial deficit compared to the Angels and Disney. He argued that special interests have been prioritized over residents. He stated that the proposed gate tax should be applicable to venues of 10,000 or more, to include the Honda Center and Angel Stadium. Amanda Walsh, Vice President of Government Affairs at the Orange County Business Council (OCBC), shared the OCBC's opposition to the proposed admissions and parking tax measures. She shared that new taxes would increase the costs for families and visitors. She explained that additional taxes would make Anaheim less competitive compared to neighboring destinations. She urged the City Council to oppose both measures. Mark Richard Daniels encouraged the City Council to place the entertainment and parking tax measures on the November 2026 ballot. He requested that the Mayor excuse herself from the item's consideration. He addressed the claims that visitors would stay in other cities, noting that, despite the pandemic, Disneyland has record profits. He added that the Convention Center should be included as a venue for the admissions tax. Arthur Castillo shared his history of assisting with issues regarding produce trucks and vendors and working with the Police Department and Code Enforcement. He requested one-on-one meetings with the Council to explain the history and improve communication. Bryan Kaye thanked the City Council for the recent updates to coyote management policies. He urged the City Council to show similar compassion when addressing public speakers. Mazatl Tepehyolotzin thanked Council Member Rubalcava for her presence at Indigenous People's Day and Council Member Kurtz for attending a Dia de Los Muertos event. He highlighted the native desert plants near OCVIBE. He commented on the removal of the Anaheim High School Colonist mascot. He expressed support for Item No. 27. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 9 of 32 Steven reported an altercation involving himself and a federal agent. He shared that Anaheim Police Department (APD) officers were present and did not intervene or report the incident. He called upon the City Council and APD leadership to publicly release all body camera footage and patrol camera footage, launch a full investigation, and disclose APD policies and agreements with federal agencies Marc Herbert shared that Girlie Bloomquist, who spoke at the September 23rd meeting, is still waiting for assistance. He commented on the City's shortage of affordable housing units. He shared that benefits are often fast -tracked for private interests over residents and called for leadership to change that pattern. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: Council Member Kurtz highlighted the Anaheim Fall Festival and Parade that took place at Center Greens Park. She thanked City staff who worked to ensure safety on the parade route and that the entertainment continued at the park throughout the event. She thanked the Anaheim Fall Festival Committee who volunteer their time to coordinate vendors, food, and build the floats. Council Member Kurtz announced workshops offered by the Housing and Community Development Department on the First -Time Homebuyer Program. She thanked Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter and her team for hosting the workshops. She shared that the workshop held the weekend prior was well attended and included presentations from realtors and mortgage lenders. She reported that the applications would open in mid -November. Council Member Maahs shared photos from her outreach visit to the Hoover Dam and Colorado River with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. She explained that the visit provided valuable insight into the extensive planning, engineering, and coordination to ensure a safe and reliable water supply for Anaheim residents and businesses. She shared that Anaheim Public Utilities plays a vital role in that effort to ensure local water continues to meet the highest quality and safety standards in the nation. She reported that Anaheim's water is carefully treated, continuously tested, and reliably delivered to homes and businesses every day. She emphasized the importance of using water wisely given unpredictable climate patterns. Council Member Maahs reported that Anaheim Public Utilities offers several programs and rebates for residents and businesses and encouraged the public to visit Anaheim.net/savewater for more information. She thanked the Metropolitan Water District and Director Steve Faessel for the invitation. Council Member Maahs shared that she attended the Strides for Disability event hosted by Easterseals of Southern California at Angels Stadium. She noted that the event brings families, friends, and organizations together to celebrate disability, pride, and inclusion while raising awareness and support for the important services that the Easterseals provide to the City and region. She highlighted the Rollette's performance, DJ Joe Maestro, and the attendance of Wild Wing. She recognized the first responders who ensured that the public could enjoy the event safely and showing up for the community. She thanked the Easterseals of Southern California for their ongoing work supporting Anaheim families, from early childhood programs, autism services, and employment opportunities for adults with disabilities. She announced that for additional information, please visit socal.easterseals.com. Council Member Maahs reported that she visited Edison Park with Kaiser Permanente employees for a cleanup. She shared that volunteers from across Southern California joined together to help. She added that a group of Ballet Folklorico dancers were also practicing ,in the park, which highlighted family and culture coming together in the City's public spaces. She thanked the volunteers and City staff for identifying the park for clean-up services. Council Member Maahs highlighted the Oak Canyon Nature Center's Acorn Festival, which included dances, crafts, vendors, and food provided by local caterer and District 5 resident, Ryan, who operates Smoke and Grill. She acknowledged City staff members, Anaheim Sporn, Liz Hernandez, and Nikki Sandusky for organizing the event each year. She shared that the event creates a sense of place for the public. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 10 of 32 She shared that a woman of native descent, on the trail, who was not aware of the event, had connected with someone who provided her information on how to learn about her family history. She thanked staff for their hard work and for cultivating a trusting relationship with local tribes. Council Member Maahs thanked the Fall Festival volunteers and staff for the event. She expressed pride in the artistry in Anaheim. She announced that on November 15, South Junior High will be hosting a Run for Sharks event to raise awareness for the ocean and bring ocean awareness to Anaheim kids. She expressed her excitement as a sponsor and invited everyone to attend. Council Member Leon thanked those who attended and provided public comments. He acknowledged the concerns that were raised and shared that the City Council has the responsibility to take any and all concerns seriously. He explained that Anaheim residents deserve full confidence that taxpayer dollars are being managed responsibly and noted that the City Manager would have additional information to provide. Council Member Leon reported that he attended the Loara Band Review and shared his excitement to support local high school bands. He added that the event is a great opportunity to showcase and highlight the City and welcome students and parents from across the region. He thanked the Anaheim Police Department for keeping everyone safe during the event and thanked Anaheim Public Utilities for their additional support to students. He shared that he marched alongside the Boys and Girls Club of Anaheim, Savanna High School parents, and District 2 residents in the Anaheim Halloween parade. He echoed his Council colleagues and thanked the organizers, volunteers, and all City staff and families who made the tradition a success. Council Member Leon highlighted the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department for stopping by a District 2 neighborhood and interacting with the community, building relationships, and inspiring the next generation of first responders. Council Member Leon congratulated Chef Bruno Serato and shared that he joined Caterina's Club to celebrate its 20th Anniversary. He shared that the organization continues to make a difference across Anaheim. He highlighted the Housing and Community Development Department for the workshop held at the Brookhurst Community Center. He explained that the workshop is an important step to helping Anaheim families achieve homeownership and build generational stability in the City. He shared that the next workshop would be held on November 1, and additional information is available on the City website. Council Member Leon reported that the first District 2 Open House was held and brought together residents and City departments to discuss neighborhood priorities and ways to improve services and address issues in the neighborhood. He thanked Magnolia High School for opening its new cybersecurity building and hosting the event. He thanked residents for attending and Anaheim Public Utilities employees Jimmy and Manny for helping a resident replace their Dusk -to - Dawn lights. Council Member Leon invited the community to attend the third annual Trunk or Treat event. He shared that his office is collaborating with the Anaheim Elementary School District and different car clubs including Naranjeros, Brown Descents Car Club, and the Anaheim Car Club. He added that the Police Department, Fire and Rescue Department, Public Utilities, and Public Works would be in attendance. He reported that the event is a fun, family -friendly event featuring decorated trunks, raffle prizes, candy, and Halloween spirits. He shared that the event will take place on Thursday, October 30, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. at Key Elementary. Council Member Rubalcava shared that she is a fourth -generation Anaheim resident and thanked all who attended the meeting to express their position on a tourism tax and parking assessment in the City. She announced that she is a supporter of labor, all unions, including Unite Here Local 11, and trades. She explained that the intention behind the tax is not to hurt businesses or hurt anybody within the trades. She mentioned that she voted to approve the Disneyland Forward project which would generate tremendous work for residents. Council Member Rubalcava added that the City Council championed a Community Workforce Agreement which eliminated the project list, limiting work for labor contractors, and created a $700,000 threshold. She explained that the initiative would generate more jobs within the City that are not limited to private sector businesses. She mentioned City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 11 of 32 that the City's businesses have increased their admission taxes by 88% over the last ten years, which has not hindered or had negative impacts on the local economy. Council Member Rubalcava explained that she was elected by the people of Anaheim to not only ensure that the City budget is funded properly, but also create safe neighborhoods and address all quality -of -life issues created by the tourism economy. She shared that when she was a child, there was only one hotel and parking lot and the area was not considered the Resort District. She explained that the City has allowed Disney to continue to thrive in the community and grow to generate the most jobs in the State. She added that it is time to consider an opportunity for residents to benefit from the thriving economy. Council Member Rubalcava reported that she respects the public commenters supported by Disney. She shared that she hopes to have a robust conversation about the benefits of a tourism tax for residents and employees who serve the City. She added that the tax would be applicable to large businesses over 20,000 within the City who utilize the City's infrastructure. Council Member Balius highlighted the Fall Festival. He shared that many residents attended the event on Friday and Saturday and had a fantastic time. He thanked all those who contributed to the event. He shared that Los Novillos Market held a grand opening at Beach and Ball in District 1. He welcomed them to the community and encouraged the public to visit. He added that they have a nice fresh fruit selection, a meat counter, a salsa bar, and sell Porto's cakes. He announced that on December 5, the West Anaheim Organization will be hosting the Twila Reid Tree Lighting event. He added that he will mention the event at the next Council meeting. CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE: City Manager Vanderpool addressed a recent news story, stating that the City disagrees with the characterization of the coverage and the claims made. It defies years of reliable, responsible financial management at the City of Anaheim, something attested to in yearly financial audits by KPMG LLP and recognized by the Government Finance Officers Association. He stated that he needs to respect all involved by not speaking directly to the specific claim, but the nature of any claim is that anything can be said, verified or unverified, and that is the right of someone filing a claim. City Manager Vanderpool urged caution on this and all claims. He stated that the City has safeguards in place for procurement contracts, purchasing cards, and other financial and workplace matters. He stated that the City's initial review does not suggest fraud or warrant the characterizations seen in the coverage of the claim. City Manager Vanderpool shared that the City stands by its purchases of ambulances now serving the community, and by the handling of purchasing cards and computers. City Manager Vanderpool stated that the City welcomes and takes all concerns seriously. He shared that before this coverage, an independent review by an outside law firm had already been commissioned and is several weeks underway. City Manager Vanderpool stated that he looks forward to gaining a better understanding of the facts and what the next steps may be, as the process plays out. He stated that everyone can continue to place trust in the professionalism of City staff and the high ethical standards the organization operates by. The community can continue to hold confidence in the City's budget and stewardship of public money. City Manager Vanderpool shared that he attended the Cal Chiefs Conference. He stated that he was happy to welcome fire chiefs and other fire leaders from around the state to Anaheim for their annual Cal Chiefs Conference. City Manager Vanderpool had the privilege of speaking at the conference, highlighting the importance of the Fire Department's role in responding to medical emergencies, fires, accidents, and rescues. He thanked the Anaheim Fire and Rescue team and Police Department for their dedication and professionalism, especially on National First Responders Day City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 12 of 32 CONSENT CALENDAR: At 7:37 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Council Member Kurtz pulling Item No. 13, Council Member Balius pulling Item No. 10, and Council Member Rubalcava pulling Item No. 15. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Meeks moved to waive reading of the ordinance and resolutions and adopt the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Meeks, Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES - 0. Motion carried. B105 1. Receive and file the Library Board Report regarding the Anaheim Public Library System for Fiscal Year 2024/25 dated October 13, 2025; and the minutes of the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District Advisory Board meetings of April 17, 2025 and July 17, 2025, the Community Services Board meeting of July 10, 2025; the Library Board meeting of September 8, 2025; the Older Adults Commission meetings of June 19, 2025 and August 21, 2025; and the Sister City Commission meeting of September 22, 2025. D116 2. Ratify a proclamation recognizing Judy Koyama as a founding leader of the Orange County Buddhist Church Girl Scouts Troop; and approve a proclamation recognizing November 1, 2025, as Extra Mile Day, and a certificate recognizing Anaheim High School's Football Team. D116 3. Receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for September 2025. D128 4. Approve carryover expenditure appropriations of $156,224,252 from Fiscal Year 2024/25 to Fiscal Year 2025/26 for projects previously approved by the City Council but not completed. D155 5. Approve the Anaheim Workforce Development Board Recertification Request for Program Years 2025-2027 under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, and direct staff to submit the Recertification Request to the State of California. D155 6. Approve an application designating the City of Anaheim as an Adult and Dislocated Worker Career Services Provider for the Anaheim Local Area under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and authorize staff to submit the application to the State of California. AGR-15678 7. Approve Contract MA# 106-498866 with Golden Buckeye, Inc. DBA Burnett Printing and Graphics for as -needed citywide printing services of envelopes, letterhead and business cards, with a first -year amount of $78,435, which reflects the bid amount along with applicable taxes and a 40% contingency, for a cumulative not to exceed amount of $568,435, effective upon contract execution for a period of one year, with four one-year optional renewals; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all necessary contractual documents related to the contract in accordance with Bid #9864. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 13 of 32 AGR-15679 8. Approve Contract MA# 106-498872 with California Health and Safety, Inc. in a cumulative contract amount not to exceed $290,125, inclusive of all applicable taxes and a 35% contingency, for Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) testing, maintenance and repair for the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department, for a one year period with four one-year optional renewals; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all necessary contractual documents related to the contract all in accordance with Bid #9858. AGR-15680 9• Approve Contract MA# 106-498849 with Turnout Maintenance Company, LLC, in a cumulative contract amount not to exceed $150,555 inclusive of all applicable taxes and a 35% contingency, for repair and alteration services of turnout gear for the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Department, for a one year period with four one-year optional renewals; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all necessary contractual documents related to the contract in accordance with Bid #9857. AGR-15682 11. Approve Subscription Agreement with West Publishing Corporation, a Thomson Reuters business, at a monthly rate of $6,017, for online legal research, publications, and legal forms for a one year period with two one-year optional renewals with a three percent (3%) increase in years two and three; authorize the City Attorney to execute the agreement, and authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue the Purchase Order. AGR-15683 12. Approve four Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) between the City of Anaheim and the AGR-15684 Anaheim Workforce Development Board, and the State of California Employment AGR-15685 Development Department, the State of California Department of Rehabilitation, the County of AGR-15686 Orange Social Services Agency, and North Orange Continuing Education, for the Anaheim One -Stop Delivery System, for the term beginning on July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2028; and authorize the Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, to execute and administer the MOUs and any corresponding license agreements. AGR-15688 14. Approve the Services Agreement with Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC (Aramark) granting Aramark the exclusive right to provide food and beverage services at the Anaheim Convention Center (ACC) for a term of seven years with the option to extend for an additional three (3) years, one year at a time, by providing written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to the end of the current term; Net revenues from the food and beverage operations at the ACC will be retained by the City, with the City paying Aramark an annual management fee of $450,000 for their services, and Aramark being eligible to receive annual Incentive Fees up to an additional 30% of the base management fee, contingent upon established performance criteria; Aramark will pay to the City a Capital Investment in the amount of $2,500,000, for equipment, retail, small wares, tableware, and other miscellaneous items; and authorize and direct the Executive Director of the Convention, Sports & Entertainment Department to execute the agreement and any other related documents, including all actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement. AGR-15690 16. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Henkels & McCoy West, LLC, in the not to exceed amount of $4,988,294, plus a 10% contingency for as -needed extra services, for inspection services of underground and surface -mounted electric and fiber optic systems, with a two-year term with an option to extend up to one additional year; authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designee, to execute the agreement and any related documents, including any cost -neutral amendments of the agreement and any documents contemplated City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 14 of 32 by the agreement, and to take such necessary or advisable actions to implement, fund, and administer the agreement; and determine that the inspection services of underground and surface -mounted electric and fiber optic systems and any related activities associated therewith are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. AGR-15691 17. Approve the cooperative agreement with the City of Orange to implement traffic signal synchronization on Ball Road -Taft Avenue from the intersection of Knott Avenue in the City of Anaheim to Tustin Street in the City of Orange, for a term through December 31, 2030, with two one-year extensions. AGR-15692 18. Approve the Electric Facilities Cost Sharing Agreement between the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City of Anaheim for installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of traffic signals and safety lighting at shared intersections. AGR-15693 19. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., in the amount estimated at $10,030,000, for funding, design, and construction of the Katella Avenue Widening as part of the Resort Area Sanitary Sewer and Roadway Widening Improvement Project, and authorize the Director of Public Works or designee, to execute the agreement and any related documents, and to take any and all actions as are necessary to implement and administer the agreement; and increase the Department of Public Works revenue and expenditure budget by $750,000. AGR-15694 20. Approve a Right of Way Contract and a Highway Easement and Temporary Construction Easement Deeds (individually "Easement" and collectively "Easements"), in substantial form, with the Orange County Transportation Authority for portions of property along East Frontera Street to support the State Route 91 Segment No. 2 Improvement Project; authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Agreement or Easements, as determined by the City Attorney's Office; authorize the City Clerk to release the Easements to the Orange County Transportation Authority; and authorize the acceptance of a payment in the amount of $99,155. AGR-15695 21 Approve the Agreement for Sale of Credits with Land Veritas Corp (Bank Sponsor) (Project ProponeFEnt), in the amount of $177,000, for the purchase of 0.46 acres of 1600 Ephemeral Riparian Enhancement credits from the Soquel Canyon Mitigation Bank to satisfy compensatory mitigation requirements for the Orangewood Avenue Bridge Widening Project over the Santa Ana River; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the Agreement for Sale of Credits, and authorize a payment in the amount of $177,000 to Land Veritas Corp. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 15 of 32 AGR-1666.T 22. RESOLUTION NO. 2025-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving a Cooperative Fire Protection Agreement with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, and authorizing the Anaheim Fire Chief to execute the Operating Plan and any other documents required in connection with that agreement [term of July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026; not to exceed amount of $211, 331.84]. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Fire Programs Local Responsibility Area wildland Protection Reimbursement Agreement No. 3CA07262. D175 23. RESOLUTION NO. ._._. 2025-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM certifying that Anaheim has the resources to fund the projects submitted for inclusion in the FY 2026/27 - 2031/32 Transportation Improvement Program and affirming its commitment to implement all of the projects submitted in the program. 24. RESOLUTION NO. _ 2025-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE D154.4 CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by the Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local No. 2899; and superseding Resolutions Nos. 2022-135 and 2025-010 [effective June 20, 2025 through June 19, 2027]. Amend the Fire & Rescue Department's Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget by $5,671,810. M142 25. Receive and file the Anaheim Police Department's Annual (2024) Military Equipment Report. ORDINANCE NO. 6616 _ (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM renewing, with modifications, Ordinance No. 6598 approving the Anaheim Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy pursuant to California Government Code Section 7071 [Anaheim Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy 7051. BUSINESS CALENDAR: AGR-15681 10. Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Servitek Electric Inc., in the amount of $3,572,988 for the Advanced Dilemma Zone and left turn signal phasing modification project at seven locations (Brookhurst Street at Ball Road, Brookhurst Street at La Palma Avenue, Euclid Street at Crescent Avenue, Lincoln Avenue at Harbor Boulevard, Magnolia Avenue at Lincoln Avenue, Broadway at Magnolia Avenue, and Knott Avenue at Ball Road); authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and any other related documents, and to take such actions as are necessary to implement and administer the contract; find that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 2, Section 15302 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions. DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius highlighted the intersections being upgraded with a dedicated turn -lane in District 1, including Magnolia Avenue and Lincoln Avenue, Broadway at Magnolia Avenue, and Knott Avenue and Ball Road. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 16 of 32 Council Member Leon requested additional information regarding the upgrades. Director of Public Works Rudy Emami explained that the traffic signals are being upgraded to include a protected left -turn signal for safer operations. He added that recent projects have taken up to nine months to a year. Council Member Leon highlighted the project and the four intersections shared between Districts 1 and 2. He expressed his gratitude for the Public Works team and anticipation for the project to move forward. MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Servitek Electric Inc., in the amount of $3,572,988 for the Advanced Dilemma Zone and left turn signal phasing modification project at seven locations (Brookhurst Street at Ball Road, Brookhurst Street at La Palma Avenue, Euclid Street at Crescent Avenue, Lincoln Avenue at Harbor Boulevard, Magnolia Avenue at Lincoln Avenue, Broadway at Magnolia Avenue, and Knott Avenue at Ball Road); authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and any other related documents, and to take such actions as are necessary to implement and administer the contract; find that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 2, Section 15302 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions, seconded by Council Member Leon. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Meeks, Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15687 13. Approve modifications to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Guidelines, in substantial form; waive City Council Policy 4.1 for procurement of services and approve a Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant Subrecipient Agreement with John Sottek, doing business as, Housing Programs, in the amount of $50,000, for Residential Rehabilitation Program administration services, for an initial one year term from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 with two additional one-year options for a total maximum compensation amount not to exceed $150,000; and authorize the Housing and Community Development Director, or designee, to execute all agreements, de minimis updates to operating guidelines and attachments, and other documents necessary to implement and administer the grant activities, provided that the maximum compensation authority is not increased. DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz expressed her support for the item and requested additional information on the program. Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter reported that the program is advertised through libraries, mobile resource centers, and throughout the community. She shared staff attended District Council meetings to provide information about the program to residents. In response to Council Member Kurtz, Deputy Director of Housing and Community Development Sandra Lozeau shared that the Housing team meets with Code Enforcement and provided marketing and advertisements through the previous provider. She noted that the marketing will continue with the new provider. She reported that residents can contact the Housing and Community Development Department via telephone to enroll on the waiting list. Director Ruiz-Stepter added that the program and Code Enforcement are funded through the Community Development Block Grant. She explained that the grant funds are for enforcement and potential mitigation. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 17 of 32 MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve modifications to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Guidelines, in substantial form; waive City Council Policy 4.1 for procurement of services and approve a Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant Subrecipient Agreement with John Sottek, doing business as, Housing Programs, in the amount of $50,000, for Residential Rehabilitation Program administration services, for an initial one year term from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 with two additional one-year options for a total maximum compensation amount not to exceed $150,000; and authorize the Housing and Community Development Director, or designee, to execute all agreements, de minimis updates to operating guidelines and attachments, and other documents necessary to implement and administer the grant activities, provided that the maximum compensation authority is not increased. DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Leon, Director Ruiz-Stepter shared that the program is for lower -income homebuyers, who require minor repairs to their home. She explained that there are three components to the program: the first is for single-family homes or condos, eligible for $15,000 in the form of a forgivable loan after ten years, the second is for major repairs for up to a $100,000 loan with a 3% interest, and a $15,000 for mobile homes. She added that mobile homes are treated differently from single or primary properties due to their appreciation value. Council Member Rubalcava expressed her appreciation for the inclusion of mobile home parks, noting District 3 includes a mobile home park with residents on fixed incomes. She inquired about the Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) and the longevity of the funds. Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that the CDBG funds are federal. She shared that the program has been authorized and would be available through 2026. She noted that the CDBG has experienced strong support from the federal government, and staff remain hopeful that the program will continue. She added that if the funds were not available, staff would return to Council to seek direction. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Ruiz-Stepter stated that staff would attempt to identify alternative funding sources and, if unsuccessful, would return to the City Council to report their findings and confirm funding sources, likely from the General Fund. Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for their responsiveness to residents in the City and for developing programs to help lower -income residents escape homelessness. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve modifications to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Guidelines, in substantial form; waive City Council Policy 4.1 for procurement of services and approve a Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant Subrecipient Agreement with John Sottek, doing business as, Housing Programs, in the amount of $50,000, for Residential Rehabilitation Program administration services, for an initial one year term from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 with two additional one-year options for a total maximum compensation amount not to exceed $150,000; and authorize the Housing and Community Development Director, or designee, to execute all agreements, de minimis updates to operating guidelines and attachments, and other documents necessary to implement and administer the grant activities, provided that the maximum compensation authority is not increased, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken inquired about the volunteer programs with the new program administrator. Director Ruiz-Stepter responded that due to CDBG requirements, the program is administered by a licensed contractor. Deputy Director Lozeau added that applicants not eligible for the program are referred to other non -profits that partner with the City. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 18 of 32 Mayor Aitken suggested that the City speak with additional non -profits, including the building trades and the Orange County Business Council, to assist applicants who are not eligible or qualify for the program. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve modifications to the Residential Rehabilitation Program Guidelines, in substantial form; waive City Council Policy 4.1 for procurement of services and approve a Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Community Development Block Grant Subrecipient Agreement with John Sottek, doing business as, Housing Programs, in the amount of $50,000, for Residential Rehabilitation Program administration services, for an initial one year term from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026 with two additional one-year options for a total maximum compensation amount not to exceed $150,000; and authorize the Housing and Community Development Director, or designee, to execute all agreements, de minimis updates to operating guidelines and attachments, and other documents necessary to implement and administer the grant activities, provided that the maximum compensation authority is not increased, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Meeks, Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15689 15. Approve the Games Agreement, in substantial form, with the Los Angeles Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games 2028 dba OCOG (OCOG) to formalize the terms and relationship between the City and OCOG in preparation of the City and Honda Center hosting indoor volleyball during the upcoming 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games (the 2028 Games); and authorize the City Manager to execute the Games Agreement and any other related documents and take such actions as are necessary, required or advisable to implement and administer the Games Agreement, and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Games Agreement, as determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney's Office. Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment Tom Morton reported that in September 2016, in connection with the City of Los Angeles' candidature for the 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games, Anaheim, as a proposed venue City, provided a letter outlining certain governing principles and commitments as part of the submitted application questionnaire. He shared that in September 2017, Los Angeles was awarded the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games by the International Olympic Committee. He stated that the City and the Honda Center were announced as the setting for all Olympic indoor volleyball for the 2028 Olympic Games. He reported that following the announcement, the City and LA28 have met regularly and worked collaboratively to complete negotiations on the terms and conditions of the Games Agreement. Executive Director Morton reported that the Games Agreement establishes Anaheim as a venue city and the principles and commitments for the City's participation, including specific terms and conditions to provide a collaborative framework for the City and LA28 during the events. He outlined key elements of the agreement, including the City's role for delivery of standard and enhanced public services and reimbursement of the City's expenses, which would be negotiated through future supplemental agreements. He added that the enhanced City standard and public services would be formalized through an Enhanced City Resources Master Agreement. He stated that a Venue Services Agreement would specify the enhanced resources and logistics for the City requirements at and near the Honda Center. He shared that both agreements would be presented for City Council approval in October 2026 and 2027 respectively. Executive Director Morton announced that the City would provide normal and customary public services for the Games at the City's expense and additional public services at the Games' expense, and would be outlined in the Enhanced City Resources Master Agreement. He reported that a Venue City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 19 of 32 Services Agreement will be executed to detail the venue's enhanced City resources cost and access rights. He added that the City would assist in the facilitation of discussions between LA28 and its media operators. He announced that for new hotel development applications, following the effective date of the Games Agreement, the City would require developers to allow LA28 to purchase up to 90% of the hotel's inventory for use by Games -related stakeholders during the Games. Executive Director Morton reported that the City agreed not to subject the Games and/or ticket buyers to any future admission taxes, parking taxes, or related taxes, provided that the City takes any action legally required for a voter -initiated petition. He shared that LA28 and the International Olympic Committee would be encouraging and supporting responsible concern for environmental issues. He announced that the City would ensure that laws and regulations for unauthorized street trading within the vicinity of the Games would be enforced. He added that the City would work in collaboration with LA28 and local, regional, and national business trade and service organizations to promote and encourage the charging of regular and customary prices for goods and services for attendees. Executive Director Morton reported that the City would support LA28 and applicable partners, including the Honda Center, to streamline and provide a timely review of all permitting and zoning needs for the Games. He added that following approval of the Games Agreement, the City would be required to enter into an Enhanced City Resources Agreement by October 1, 2026 which would establish terms, service levels, unit costs, rates, repayment timelines, and audit rights for City services at LA28's expense. He reported that a separate Venue Services Agreement would be required for specific enhanced City resources required for the Honda Center and the surrounding games footprint area and associated costs for reimbursement. DISCUSSION: In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton explained that the Games Agreement sets the standards for the City's obligations without the Honda Center event. He added that the enhanced components of the agreement have not been fully developed. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on potential reimbursement, operating costs, and a timeline for reimbursement. Executive Director Morton announced that there would be 15 days of activity around the Honda Center. He explained that the economic impact is based on the visitor activity, including hotel stays, and restaurant visits. He reported that Visit Anaheim has already secured a room block for 4,000 rooms during the Olympics. He added that the room block does not include other countries buying out hotels compared to staying at the Olympic Village. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton explained that room blocks include attrition for insurance purposes. He stated that safeguards for cancellations on rooms outside of the room block would be at the property level. Council Member Rubalcava inquired about a plan to support increases to the City's infrastructure if the City would not hire additional police officers. Executive Director Morton explained that the City would maximize its current resources and seek assistance from neighboring cities, with the costs reimbursed by LA28. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Executive Director Morton stated that the enhanced services would be reimbursed. Mayor Aitken highlighted Executive Director Morton for assisting her in organizing a collaboration with County partners, State partners, hoteliers, the Resort area, business leaders, and transportation City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 20 of 32 partners for the Olympics. She announced that Visit Anaheim has been working on community watch programs to provide access to view the events if individuals are unable to purchase tickets or not located in the area. Mayor Pro Tem Meeks expressed her excitement over Anaheim as a host city for the Olympics. She suggested using fun zones in the community for areas near the event for watch parties, demonstrations, and interactions with the athletes. MOTION: Council Member Balius moved to approve the Games Agreement, in substantial form, with the Los Angeles Organizing Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games 2028 dba OCOG (OCOG) to formalize the terms and relationship between the City and OCOG in preparation of the City and Honda Center hosting indoor volleyball during the upcoming 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games (the 2028 Games); and authorize the City Manager to execute the Games Agreement and any other related documents and take such actions as are necessary, required or advisable to implement and administer the Games Agreement, and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the Games Agreement, as determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney's Office, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Meeks, Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES — 0. Motion carried. T108 26. Presentation during a public meeting regarding the proposed modification to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) relating to expanding ATID boundaries; adding housing related activities and improvements that can be funded with ATID funds; changing allocation of assessment funds; establishing a housing committee; and adding newly constructed or converted vacation ownership resort/timeshare units to businesses subject to the assessment, pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-088 (Resolution of Intention) adopted by the City Council on September 23, 2025 [public testimony on this item will be taken during the Public Comments portion of the meeting] [Informational Item]. Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia reported that the City Council approved a Resolution of Intent in September to set a public hearing to consider the proposed ATID modifications. He stated that State law required the City to hold a public meeting and a presentation to allow for additional public testimony during the meeting's public comment period. He explained that the modifications include establishing a dedicated and ongoing funding allocation for workforce housing, expanding the ATID boundaries to incorporate the existing VIV hotel and potential hotels along or near Anaheim Boulevard up to Ball Road, eliminating an existing exemption for vacation ownership or time share units, updating the revenue split between marketing and transportation funds, updates to the Management Plan, and establishing a Housing Committee. He outlined the proposed funding allocation, noting that 9% would be allocated toward workforce housing programs with 75% of the remaining revenues dedicated to marketing and promotion, and 25% for transportation. He provided an overview of the ATID's boundaries, noting the requested expansion to include the VIV hotel and potential hotels along or near Anaheim Boulevard. He reported that the Municipal Code, the Management Plan, and the ATID boundary maps would be amended. He announced that the public hearing is scheduled for November 18th to introduce an ordinance, the Management Plan, and related items, and tabulate any protests on the proposed modifications. He explained that if the protest votes constitute over 50% of the assessed facilities, the item would not move forward. He added if the protests do not meet a majority and the ordinance is introduced, the second reading would take place on December 9th, with funding for housing programs commencing in February 2026. Informational item; no formal action taken by the City Council. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 21 of 32 E127 27. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA ordering the submission of a general tax measure set forth in a proposed ordinance adding Chapter 2.15 (Tourism Tax) to Title 2 (Taxes) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to establish a three percent (3%) tourism tax on patrons of privately owned or operated theme parks and entertainment and sporting events/venues with a capacity of over 20,000 people to the qualified voters of the City of Anaheim at the General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 [includes determination that the general tax measure relates to organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378(b)]. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA ordering the submission of a general tax measure set forth in a proposed ordinance adding Chapter 2.16 (Parking Tax) to Title 2 (Taxes) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to establish a ten percent (10%) tax on patrons who park at parking facilities with a capacity to park over 1,500 vehicles to the qualified voters of the City of Anaheim at the general municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 [includes determination that the general tax measure relates to organizational or administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, and therefore is not a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15378(b)]. City Attorney Robert Fabela reported that the proposed measures would establish a 3% tourism tax on large entertainment and sporting venues and a 10% parking tax on privately operated parking facilities in Anaheim. He stated that at the September 231 Council meeting, Council Member Rubalcava requested that staff prepare potential ballot measures for Anaheim voters' consideration to support essential City services. He explained that if approved, the measures would appear on the November 3, 2026, General Municipal Election ballot. He added that revenues from the taxes would be deposited into the General Fund and could be used for any lawful municipal purpose. City Attorney Fabela reported that a tourism tax would impose a 3% tax Citywide on the admission price paid by patrons of privately owned or operated theme parks and entertainment or sporting venues with a capacity of more than 20,000 people. He added that the tax would apply to tickets for Disneyland, Disney's California Adventure, and Angel Stadium. He shared that the proposed measure would generate an estimated $89 million to $134 million annually. He stated that the proposed ballot question, regulated by State statute, would read "Shall the City of Anaheim impose a tax equal to 3% of the admission (ticket) price on patrons of privately owned or operated large (capacity exceeding 20,000 people) theme parks and sports and entertainment events/venues, generating $89 million to $134 million annually to be used for general City services such as parks, street maintenance, police, fire and emergency response, youth/senior services and affordable housing, until ended by the voters?" City Attorney Fabela stated that the second measure would create at 10% tax on parking fees at privately owned or operated facilities with 1,500 or more parking spaces. He explained that the tax would be paid by the operator of the vehicle, with the operator of the lot or structure collecting and remitting the tax to the City. He reported that the tax would generate approximately $19 million to $30 million per year in new General Fund revenue. He stated that the ballot question would read "Shall the City of Anaheim establish a parking tax equal to 10% of the parking fee/charge on people who park at privately owned or operated large (capacity exceeding 1,500 vehicles) parking facilities, generating $19 million to $30 million annually to be used for general City services such as parks, street maintenance, police, fire and emergency response, youth/senior services, affordable housing City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 22 of 32 and other quality of life services, until ended by the voters?" He added that parking structures at hotels that are already subject to the City's Transient Occupancy Tax would be exempt to avoid double taxation. City Attorney Fabela noted that there are contractual considerations tied to the proposed measures, including the City's lease agreement with the Angels, which included a clause providing that any revenues from tax measures would be applied as a credit to the lease amount. He explained that potential revenues for Angels Stadium were not included in the estimated tax projection. He added that the development agreements with DisneylandForward and OCVIBE allowed the City to impose Citywide taxes that apply generally to categories of development as long as the tax is not directed solely at those projects. He advised that it is the City's belief that both proposed taxes meet those tests; however, the City would not be immune from defending lawsuits arguing otherwise. He stated that the City's proposed Host Agreement with the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Committee requires that no admissions or parking taxes apply to Olympic events. He noted that the proposed ordinances included exemptions for Olympic events held in Anaheim, consistent with the contract. He added that for approval, the City Council must approve the resolutions with five affirmative votes, per the City Charter. If approved, he reported that staff would work with the Orange County Registrar of Voters to prepare the ballot materials for the November 2026 election, prepare arguments in support or against, and the timing of the City Attorney's Impartial Analysis. He added that there would be opportunities for community education and voter outreach, explaining the proposed measures and their impacts. Director of Finance Deborah A. Moreno provided an overview of the adopted General Fund Five -Year Forecast. She noted that the City's budget was balanced with the use of one-time money, including the balance of working capital bond proceeds, $10 million previously set -aside for the repayment of debt, and proceeds from the Hilton parking structure sale. She added that the Lease Payment Measurement Revenues (LPMR) would be paid off in April 2027; however, there are risks that could upset the balance of the Five -Year Forecast, including labor agreements and economic recessions. Director Moreno reported that the General Fund is the main repository of tax revenues and discretionary sources of funding. She noted that the City's "Big 3" revenues, (Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), Sales and Use, and Property Taxes) make up 74% of General Fund revenue sources. She added that TOT is the highest revenue source at 39%. Sales and Use Tax make up 18% and Property taxes make up 17%, with Business License, Fees and Permits, Other Revenues, and Transfers from Other Funds making up the remaining revenue. She stated that the adopted TOT budget for FY 2025/26 is approximately $247 million, or 39% of the General Fund's operating sources. She noted that the Resort area accounts for 97% or $238.3 million of all TOT revenue received. She reported that visitors to Anaheim pay a 15% tax on hotel, motel, and short-term rental stays of 30 days or less. She noted that the revenues support services to the community that would otherwise need to be funded by taxes on Anaheim residents. Director Moreno stated that the adopted FY 2025/26 Sales and Use Tax budget is $115 million or 18% of General Fund operating sources. She noted that the Resort area accounts for 28% or $32.5 million of all Sales Tax revenue received. She explained that Sales and Use Tax is a tax applied to the sale of tangible personal property and that Anaheim's tax rate is 7.75% of retail sales. She reported that the City received 1 cent of every dollar spent in Anaheim. She noted that 30% of the revenues are from general retail and the remaining 70% is shared almost equally among the food, transportation, construction and business -to -business categories. Director Moreno reported that the adopted FY 2025/26 budget is $111 million, or 17% of the General Fund operating sources, with the Resort area accounting for about 15% or $16.4 million of all Property Tax revenue received. She explained that all real and tangible personal property in the State City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 23 of 32 is subject to a property tax equal to 1 % of the value. Our share is approximately 20%. She added that the balance is shared among other local taxing entities, including the County, schools, and special districts. Director Moreno reported that 64% of expenditures go toward keeping the City safe, which includes Police and Fire, and is typical of local government. She noted that labor expenditures of $378.1 million compose nearly 70% of the General Fund budget and includes full and part-time salaries, overtime, Fire minimum staffing, and all associated employee benefit costs, including mental, dental, workers' compensation and retirement. Director Moreno stated that the Five -Year Forecast does not contemplate the threat of recession or other risks that would cause the deficit to grow and fund balances to dip below the minimum policy level. She added that any revenue loss associated with a recession could compromise the projected payoff of the LPMR revenue bonds. She noted that the Citywide classification and compensation study and expiring memoranda of understanding with several labor groups add risk to the Five -Year Forecast. She noted that the Five -Year Forecast does not include any salary adjustments beyond what is contractually obligated in the current agreements. She mentioned that in addition to revenue losses associated with a potential recession, increasing labor costs related to the Citywide classification and compensation study, or expiring labor agreements, there are risks of Federal spending cuts that would directly impact the City. Director Moreno provided an overview of the Five -Year Forecast including Dispatcher salary increases, the Anaheim Firefighters' Association labor agreement, and the SAFER grant revenue. She noted that the City strives to maintain a minimum unrestricted balance of 7-10% of General Fund budgeted expenditures to moderate any revenue losses and maintain core services during times of economic hardships. She stated that while the City maintains minimum reserves at 7-10% of ongoing expenditures, the Government Finance Officers Association recommended that "governments that are more dependent on volatile revenue sources may need to maintain a higher level of unrestricted fund balance." She explained that the pandemic exposed the City's reliance on TOT; however, the impact was mitigated by the LPMR transfer. She added that with the payoff of the Resort bonds, the volatility of TOT becomes a greater risk to the City's financial health and a reevaluation of the City's minimum fund balance policy. Director Moreno reported that more than $302.8 million, or approximately 63% of the City's General Fund tax revenues, is expected to flow into the Anaheim Resort, and is comprised of TOT taxes, Sales & Use taxes, Property taxes, and Business License taxes. She noted that the surplus of more than $140.8 million generated by the Anaheim Resort represents 27% of the City's General Fund ongoing expenditure budget which is available to provide core services across the City. Director Moreno outlined the remaining LPMR payments assuming a payoff in Spring 2027. She provided an overview of the remaining General Fund debt after the Resort bonds are retired. She added that repayment of the debt obligations would free up to $24 million per year to provide resources to the community. Director Moreno stated that addressing deferred maintenance, expanding infrastructure and adding amenities are priorities in the Strategic Plan. She reported that a new Senior Center or Community Center each could cost between $10 million and $25 million, depending on the size of the facility, with annual operating costs of at least $800,000 per year. She added that a new pool or aquatic center would cost approximately $20 million to $25 million with ongoing operating costs. She noted that Corridor beautification and pavement improvement is estimated at $40 million per year combined, and deferred maintenance would require an initial $50 million investment and $10 million per year thereafter. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 24 of 32 Director Moreno reported that under the goal of Promoting Public Safety, and in alignment with the City Council's top priorities, Fire Station 13 was included. She shared that the estimated cost of the station is approximately $20 million, with ongoing operational expenses of $3.8 million annually. She added that the cost could include a fire and ambulance company, totaling $3.8 million annually, and one-time costs of $1.5 million to purchase and upfit the apparatus. She reported that a new Police Headquarters is estimated at $350 million, with annual debt service costs of $35 million. She stated that costs were included to add an additional ten officers to support the City's goal of maintaining a safe City, which would be about $3.2 million per year with one-time costs of $800,000 for vehicles and equipment. Director Moreno provided an overview of revenue opportunities. She reported that staff reviewed current admission prices for entertainment venues and the published attendance rates, including a 20% margin of error. She stated that a 3% tax on admissions could generate between $89 million and $134 million annually. She reported that a parking tax could generate between $19 million and $30 million. DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for their work on the item. She shared her responsibility as a policymaker to ensure that the General Fund is properly funded for residents and City staff. She stated that staff did explore other revenue options, including a sales tax and utility tax. She highlighted potential impacts to residents on additional sales taxes and a utility tax. She explained that the intention for an admissions tax is not to harm any businesses, but to leverage the City's local economy that is driving development. She added that the tax is intended for the consumer to avoid direct negative impacts on companies. She explained that if the tax were a business tax, companies would be required to pay the City a fee regardless of attendance. She reported that the tax is structure similar to the TOT and would be funded by the consumer. She mentioned her previous requests for Disney to work with the City on an assessment of the parking structure, which was not initiated. She encouraged her Council colleagues to consider all of the impacts that the measures would have on the City. She reiterated that the proposal is not personal and strictly business. She added that she is open to flexibility on the percentages for the taxes. In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Moreno explained that the City has a structural deficit that would be resolved with the LPMR payoff. Council Member Kurtz inquired if there were discussions to decrease programming, community center and library hours, or consider layoffs and hiring freezes. City Manager Vanderpool confirmed that none of those options are being considered. In response to Council Member Kurtz, Council Member Rubalcava confirmed that the Council has not considered additional options. She explained that she presented the measures due to potential negative impacts on residents and businesses with other options. Council Member Kurtz stated that discretionary spending is one of the first items impacted by a recession, which would dramatically impact the Resort area and sales tax. She inquired about the impacts on the General Fund if the measures were adopted. Director Moreno reported that 70% to 80% of the General fund would be reliant on the Resort once the LPMR is paid off. Mayor Pro Tem Meeks stated that based on the excess revenue from the Resort area, the Resort has paid its share and enhanced maintenance for the City. She noted that the Resort area contributes City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 25 of 32 significantly to the General Fund. She explained that TOT was implemented to fund the bonds issued for the Resort area and not impact residents directly through taxes. She shared that the City's policies should encourage growth, new hotels, and visitors to the Resort area. She added that the proposed measures do not encourage growth for the City. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Meeks, Director Moreno confirmed that the projections did not include growth from the OCVIBE and Disneyland Forward projects because of the tentative timing. Mayor Pro Tem Meeks explained that policies encouraging growth would increase the City's revenues and budget projections. She thanked Council Member Rubalcava for bringing the item forward. She inquired about long-term impacts and budget allocations once the bonds have been paid. She encouraged exploring options for enhanced revenues and enhancements to diversify revenue streams. She stated that she would not support the item but welcomed discussion on the budget and future outlook. She requested additional information on annual overtime hours for the Police Department. Director Moreno responded that the Police Department has used over 100,000 hours of overtime in the General Fund. Mayor Pro Tem Meeks requested to discuss hiring policies for the Police officers and reducing overtime hours. Council Member Maahs shared her belief that the City should govern based on the best needs for the residents, short-term and long-term. She requested additional information on how the threshold was determined for admission. Council Member Rubalcava reported that the 20,000 threshold was determined to impact patrons visiting larger businesses. She explained that many local residents attend Ducks games and concerts at the Honda Center, and are burdened with many additional fees. She noted that Ticketmaster increases ticket costs by 60%. In response to Council Member Maahs, Council Member Rubalcava shared her interest in exploring options to exclude Anaheim residents from the proposed taxes. Council Member Maahs expressed her interest in exploring creative solutions for budget challenges. She shared her interest in diversifying revenue streams, particularly attracting businesses to the Anaheim Canyon. She expressed concern that the proposed measures would hinder development. She added that the Disney company can consider investments at other parks. Council Member Rubalcava confirmed that the City has 2,700 employees and compared the number to 2010. She noted that the number of employees has only increased 8%, residents have increased by 1 %; however, visitors have increased by 29%. She expressed her gratitude for the Resort area, however, noted challenges with hotel occupancy. She shared that the proposed measures are a diversified revenue stream since TOT only applies to hotels. She explained that the tax would apply to patrons visiting the City for the day and utilizing the City's infrastructure and services. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Moreno confirmed that after the LPMR bonds are retired, the City would have a positive budget. She added that only under a 5% scenario would there be a structural deficit in 2029. Council Member Rubalcava inquired about employee wages and a potential lack of funding for quality of services. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 26 of 32 In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Moreno reported that 97% of TOT, 28% of Sales Tax, 15% of Property Tax, and 16% of Business License Tax originate from the Resort. She added that staff applied the debt service cost for the current year and estimated that the LPMR and other debt was $128 million. She stated that staff reviews public safety costs in the Resort compared to other areas in the City, and 6% in general government supporting services. She explained that the uses are dedicated to debt service and keeping the City safe. Council Member Rubalcava clarified that the remaining balance would be $140.8 million in the General Fund. She explained that the proposed measures would provide a diversified revenue stream that is not reliant on hotels. She added that there has been limited movement for hotel occupancies. She requested clarification on the allocation of funds after the LPMR is paid off. Director Moreno reported that the current estimated deficit is $72 million. She clarified that the deficit is attributed to expenses. Council Member Rubalcava explained that the expenses are contributed to Council policies and priorities for the City to thrive. She reiterated that the measures are diversified revenue streams and supported residents' ability to vote on the issue. She outlined Council priorities and initiatives identified in the Strategic Plan. She mentioned the Corridor Beautification Program and the importance of corridor appearances for visitors. She expressed her gratitude for the Resort area as an economic engine; however, disputed the potential impacts the measures would have on development and business. She explained that, regardless of Council opinion on revenue streams, the voters should have the opportunity to decide on the measures. She welcomed other alternatives for revenue streams and the urgency to avoid layoffs or reduced services. She clarified that the proposed measure is an increase in the non -burdened admissions ticket or parking. In response to Council Member Balius, Director Moreno confirmed that there would be no tourism tax revenue if Disney were not included. Council Member Balius requested additional information on revenue estimates and if the 20% margin of error was included in the $89 million to $130.4 million estimates. Director Moreno reported that staff used publicly available documents to draft the estimates. She noted that the 20% was included and deducted from the admissions tax estimates. She added that staff used current ticket pricing, including single -day park -hopper tickets and Magic Key passes. In response to Council Member Balius, Director Moreno confirmed that attendance information was based on the most recent publicly available information from 2023. She confirmed that estimates for passholders were based on the pass value and available pricing information. She explained that the figures were based on staffs most reasonable estimate. Council Member Balius stated that the City Council also needs to consider City budget expenses in addition to a revenue stream. He provided examples of City expenses that could be potential revenue streams, including credit card bank transaction fees and a new phone system. In response to Council Member Kurtz, City Attorney Fabela reported that collection would be determined later. He added that provisions in the 1996 lease would also determine collection. Council Member Kurtz explained that the measures would only impact Disney and not the Angels. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 27 of 32 City Attorney Fabela advised that further discussion can be discussed in Closed Session. He explained that it would not be reasonable to include revenues from Angel Stadium as revenues for the City. Council Member Kurtz inquired if State law prohibits the City from taxing a single entity. City Attorney Fabela advised that the agreements with OCVIBE and Disneyland Forward require applicable taxes to be Citywide. He added that arguments could be raised and disputed during that time. Council Member Leon requested additional information on annual debt service. Director Moreno explained that if the City built another community center, it could choose to pay for the community center at one time or use a bond and assume annual debt service, which could be 10% of total costs. She noted that costs would include programming, staffing, and maintenance. In response to Council Member Leon, Director Moreno explained that actions are based on the City Council's policy decisions. Council Member Leon requested additional information on the financial situations of other cities. Assistant City Manager Garcia reported that many cities are experiencing rising costs and structural deficits. He noted that other cities are not in a similar situation with the LPMR payoff and a reversal on the structural deficit. In response to Council Member Leon, Director Moreno reported that there would be approximately $60 million in surplus after the LPMR bonds are paid. Council Member Leon inquired about how the surplus funds would be spent. City Manager Vanderpool reported that funding opportunities would be discussed during the Strategic Plan discussion at the November 18th Council meeting. In response to Council Member Leon, City Attorney Fabela clarified that the funds would be deposited into the General Fund. He added that the ballot language is similar to other measures by explaining what the General Fund dollars could be used for. He explained that if the funds become applicable to specific purposes, the tax would be considered a special tax, and require a 2/3 vote. In response to Council Member Leon, City Attorney Fabela confirmed that potential revenues from the taxes would be at the discretion of the City Council. He explained that since the measures are general taxes, the revenue would be deposited into the General Fund. He added if the funds were used for specific purposes, the tax would be considered a special tax, requiring the 2/3 voter turnout approval. Mayor Aitken requested clarification on taxes applicable to Angel Stadium. City Attorney Fabela explained that the lease agreement covers parking and admissions taxes. In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela explained that the admissions tax would apply to the Angels Stadium with a caveat, and to Disneyland and California Adventure. He added that the taxes would only apply to privately owned or operated businesses, which excludes the Convention Center. He mentioned that OCVIBE does not apply because it does not fulfill the 20,000-capacity threshold. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 28 of 32 Mayor Aitken expressed her concern that during the Disneyland Forward approval, the City Council had requested investments in parks and housing. She explained that in good -faith for bargaining and as a supporter of the unions, the proposed measures could violate labor agreements. She disagreed that the measures apply Citywide if only one business would be subject to the taxes. She shared that the proposed measures would not align with the Development Agreement and could impact the City's reputation. She explained that she would not support the item. She expressed her support for diversifying the City's tax base and attracting new businesses. She encouraged continued collaboration with the City's partners, the Resort community, and business leaders to attract investment. Council Member Rubalcava explained that companies thrive in the City compared to the residents. She encouraged Mayor Aitken to make amendments to the proposal. She requested additional information on potential deficits in 2029. Assistant City Manager Garcia explained that following the LPMR payoff, the City would have a surplus of funds. He explained that the presentation included information on rising labor costs with a potential structural deficit in 2030. He stated that many factors would need to be considered for a potential deficit. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Moreno explained that 70% of the City's budget is spent on services to residents. She noted that reserves support the City during difficult times and adjust the budget. She added that the City's bond rating increases with more reserves; however, it could be dependent on additional factors. She stated that the City's bond rating is in the A category. Council Member Rubalcava supported Council Member Balius' suggestion to review expenses. She noted that during each budget cycle, the City Council reviews different expenses that can be eliminated. She explained that the measures presented a solution for revenues and encouraged her colleagues to present different ideas. She mentioned that the tax rates could be adjusted from 3% to 1 % on the parking measure. She requested to continue the item to conduct an economic impact study that would review different revenue options and implementation MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item and request staff to conduct an economic impact study on different revenue options and implementation. DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava clarified that an economic impact study could elaborate on the impacts of the measures and review the impacts of a potential sales tax initiative. City Attorney Fabela explained that the item can be agendized for the next meeting. Council Member Rubalcava reported that the state of Florida includes sales tax on all admissions tickets without any impact. She explained that businesses would not leave the City due to additional taxes. She explained that the taxes would fund capital improvement projects that could generate jobs for local trades and residents. Council Member Maahs shared that she has spoken with the City Manager on attracting film production in the City and digitizing billboards for revenue streams. She added that a vote against the measures is not in opposition to a senior center or community center. She explained that she views taxes as a last resort for the City. She suggested collaborating with health plans or foundations to fund a senior center. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 29 of 32 Council Member Leon thanked the public who spoke on the item and Council Member Rubalcava or presenting the item. He stated that the City's priority is to find solutions that work for everyone, especially residents. He explained that he wants to ensure that the City's employees, police officers, firefighters, and Public Works are the highest paid and supported in the region. He expressed his support for the Resort and the tourism industry. He noted that the Resort District is a lifeline that provides opportunities for the City. He emphasized the City's responsibility for core obligations to continue to maintain public safety, parking, and essential services that impact residents' daily lives. He shared his interest in exploring other options and alternatives to keep the community safe, for the Resort District to thrive, and invest in the community. He explained that the surplus from the LPMR bonds have not yet been allocated and expressed support in developing a transparent plan that benefits residents, neighborhoods, and employees. He shared his responsibility to constituents to make decisions that help the City meet its financial needs and obligations without placing an undue burden on residents. Council Member Balius explained his concerns that the City would be solely dependent on entertainment and Disneyland as a revenue stream. He reported that his intent was to explore diversified revenue streams. He stated that he could not request that residents and key economic partners take on costs before the City explored other options. He shared that the City and City Council must demonstrate that it is managing the existing resources that residents and businesses have entrusted as efficiently as possible. He requested a comprehensive Citywide review across all departments to evaluate any expenditure reductions and streamline operations. He explained that the reductions should be smart and strategic and would not significantly impact service levels for residents and businesses. He reported that the City needs to conduct studies for options that would create additional or increase potential revenue streams that would not rely on new taxes. He provided an example of increasing redevelopment and service fees to market rate to generate meaningful revenue without burdening the public. He explained that he is not opposed to finding new revenue solutions while considering expenditures and opportunities for efficiencies. Council Member Rubalcava thanked her Council colleagues for taking the opportunity to review the item. She reported that she -would not be requesting a motion on the item. She expressed her interest in continuing the item until further notice. She acknowledged that the item appears to not have the support to continue as presented. She acknowledged the potential to explore other options for revenue sources and cutting expenditures. Mayor Aitken requested clarification on whether the item could be continued to a date uncertain or tabled. City Attorney Fabela advised that a motion is required to continue the item to a date uncertain or to table. He explained that the Council Member making the motion can continue to a specified date, an uncertain date, or to table. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Attorney Fabela explained that if the item is tabled, it would need to be brought back during the current meeting. He explained that the item would need to be re-agendized to another meeting if the item is not brought back during the meeting. He added that pursuant to Council Policy, unless the City Council makes an exception, there is a six-month waiting period before the item can be brought back for further action. He explained if further discussion is requested, the item can be continued. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional clarification on the waiting period. City Attorney Fabela explained that a continuation is acceptable. He clarified if the item is tabled and not discussed again during the meeting, the item could not be discussed within six months. City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 30 of 32 MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a date uncertain. DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tern Meeks inquired if the item could be presented in a revised form to discuss revenues. City Attorney Fabela explained that the requesting Council Member can make revisions. In response to Council Member Kurtz, City Attorney Fabela explained that a continuation would not constitute a vote on the substance of the item. He explained that the same information could be presented. He added if the intent is to present a different proposal, the item would be agendized differently. Mayor Pro Tern Meeks expressed her interest in continuing the discussion to discuss revenue options. City Attorney Fabela explained that the item could be continued with the Council's majority approval and understanding that the item may be updated. Council Member Rubalcava stated that exploring potential revenue sources could be included in the continued item. City Attorney Fabela explained that the item could be continued to allow discussion on other possible revenue sources and alternative options. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, City Attorney Fabela confirmed the motion can include a discussion on potential revenue sources. He explained that the resolutions may not be presented for approval, however, they could be included with the staff report. MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a date uncertain to diversify the tax base and explore alternative revenue options, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Meeks. DISCUSSION: Council Member Balius noted the upcoming Strategic Plan discussion. Mayor Pro Tern Meeks added that the discussion would cover the financial portion. Mayor Aitken expressed concern about the lack of clarity on the motion. City Attorney Fabela advised that the motion could include a continuation with certain conditions. He added that the City Council would clarify the conditions, and the item could be continued to another date. He reported that the alternative is to agendize an item under Council Agenda Setting. MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a date uncertain to diversify the tax base and explore alternative revenue options, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Meeks. DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Meeks stated that the Strategic Plan discussion would set the Council's priorities. She requested that staff return with funding options or strategies after the priorities are defined. D175 City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 31 of 32 MOTION: Council Member Rubalcava moved to continue the item to a date uncertain to diversify the tax base and explore alternative revenue options, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 5 (Mayor Pro Tem Meeks and Council Members Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES — 2 (Mayor Aitken and Council Member Balius). Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING: 28. Staff request to continue the public hearing to the Council meeting of December 9, 2025. Public Hearing to consider the proposed vacation/abandonment of two segments of Santa Ana Street right-of-way situated between Philadelphia Street and Olive Street; and between Claudina Street and Philadelphia Street. Continue the public hearing to the Council meeting of December 9, 2025. MOTION: Mayor Aitken moved to continue the public hearing to the Council meeting of December 9, 2025, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Meeks, Balius, Leon, Rubalcava, Kurtz, and Maahs); NOES — 0. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS (non -agenda items): None COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING: Council Member Maahs requested that staff explore the feasibility of hosting a Construction Jobs and Trades Fair, including an analysis of potential costs, funding sources, and possible venue locations. Council Member Balius requested a discussion and possible action item on the process and rules for placing an item on the City Council agenda, as well as the amount of staff time allocated to assist with individual Council Member requests. City Attorney Fabela requested clarification whether the item would be for discussion or include possible action. Council Member Balius responded that the item would include discussion and possible action. Mayor Aitken requested that links to the contracts executed by the City Manager and Visit Anaheim contracts be included on the City Council agenda to allow the ability to download and review the contracts. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela stated there was no reportable action. ADJOURNMENT: Council at 9:54 p.m. With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City City Council Minutes of October 28, 2025 Page 32 of 32 Respectfully submitted, d Tj3e sa Bass, CIVIC Cit Jerk From: Bulmaro Vicente <boomer@chispaoc.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 2:04 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] 10.28.25 Public Comment - Chispa Letter of Opposition Item 25 Attachments: 10.28.25 Chispa Opposition Letter Item 25.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi, Please find Chispa's Letter of Opposition for Item 25. In Solidarity, Boomer Policy and Political Director I Chispa e: boomernchispaoc.org c: 1505 E 17th Street Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501c4 non-profit organization. Chispa October 28, 2025 Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of the City Council City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Opposition to Item 25 — ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE REPORT AND ORDINANCE RENEWING THE ANAHEIM POLICE DEPARTMENT'S MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE POLICY Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Chispa, we write in strong opposition to Item 25, the Anaheim Police Department's (APD) 2024 Military Equipment Report and the renewal of its Military Equipment Use Policy. The City of Anaheim (City) must reject the further militarization of local police and ensure transparency and accountability. We appreciate that APD has complied with Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) and prepared a well -detailed report outlining its inventory, costs, and policy framework. However, we are concerned that the public -engagement process did not meet the spirit or intent of the law. The staff report notes that the Department presented its inventory and policy at the Anaheim Police Review Board's October 23, 2025 meeting. Although this was technically a public meeting, it was not well -publicized, nor did it provide an opportunity for members of the general public to ask questions, engage in discussion, or provide input as AB 481 requires. This procedural gap undermines both transparency and community trust —the very principles AB 481 was intended to uphold. Military -grade equipment in local policing carries significant implications for community safety, civil rights, and public accountability. The City Council should not move forward with approving or renewing the Police Department's Military Equipment Use Policy until a meaningful public forum is held, where residents can directly engage, ask questions, and provide feedback. Furthermore, the Department's report seeks justification for the proposed acquisition of 50 Geissele Automatics Super Duty Mod 1 SBR 11.4" rifles, at a cost of $1,504.78 per unit. Anaheim residents deserve a clear and transparent explanation for why additional tactical weaponry is necessary, especially when there is no demonstrated public safety justification for such purchases. Our communities are already living with heightened fear due to ongoing ICE raids and the reality that federal immigration enforcement holds the largest militarized police budget in U.S. history. Adding more tactical weapons to our local police department only deepens that fear and raises the risk of these tools being used against vulnerable residents, particularly immigrant families who already experience disproportionate surveillance and harm. Chispa Anaheim residents have consistently called for investments in housing, youth programs, and mental health —not more militarization. True public safety comes from meeting community needs, not expanding police arsenals. For these reasons, Chispa strongly urges the City Council to vote NO on Item 25. Sincerely, A V Bulmaro Vicente Policy and Political Director Chispa From: Liz Gonzales <liz@balancebpr.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 9:22 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment Submission — Balance Public Relations Letter re: ATID Reforms (October 28 Council Meeting) Attachments: Final Ltr Balance to Anaheim Council Oct 28 Meeting.pdf You don't often get email from liz@balancebpr.com. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear City Clerk and Honorable Council Members, On behalf of Dean Florez and Elaine Howie, Principals of Balance Public Relations, please find the attached public comment letter regarding the proposed amendments to AMC § 2.14 and the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) Management Plan, scheduled for Council consideration at the October 28, 2025 meeting. Given Balance's role assisting the Anaheim Chamber during the 2023 State Audit, the letter offers recommendations intended to strengthen transparency, prevent duplicative assessments, and ensure compliance with the Brown Act. We respectfully request that this correspondence be entered into the public record and distributed to the Mayor and City Council prior to deliberation. We believe this letter meets the 1:30p.m PDT deadline for public comment. Respectfully, Liz Liz Gonzales I Relationship Director I Executive Assistant to Senator Dean Florez, Ret Balance Public Relations, Inc. (dl) 916.800.9710 1 Email: lizCo)balancebgr.com 0 Balance October 28, 2025 Mayor Ashleigh Aitken Mayor Pro Tem Natalie Meeks Members of the Anaheim City Council City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 7th Floor Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Public Comment on Proposed Amendments to AMC § 2.14 and the ATID Management Plan Dear Mayor Aitken and Honorable Members of the City Council, We submit this letterjointly as Dean Florez, former Majority Leader of the California State Senate and President of Balance Public Relations, and Elaine M. Howle, former California State Auditor and senior advisor to Balance Public Relations, in response to the proposed amendments to AMC § 2.14 and the associated reforms to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) Management Plan. As you know, Balance Public Relations previously assisted the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce during the 2023 State Audit (Audit #2023-133), which addressed significant deficiencies in the City's contractual oversight of Visit Anaheim, particularly around the handling of ATID funds. The State Auditor's report identified key concerns —several of which remain "pending" —including lack of performance metrics, inadequate fund segregation, and deficient subcontractor oversight . These findings were not abstract: they reflected patterns that raise constitutional and statutory red flags across California's network of Tourism Improvement Districts. We write today to express our support for many of the reform elements proposed in the October 28 draft correspondence prepared by the Chamber, particularly the elimination of double -billing practices, mandatory Brown Act compliance, and statutory recognition of assessed hotel members as dues -exempt participants in any public -funded service or benefit. It is critical that the Council consider adopting stronger language around: 1. Prohibiting duplicate assessments for transportation services where mitigation or private contributions already satisfy obligations. No assessed business should ever be required to pay twice for the same service —once through a public assessment and again through private dues. This practice is inconsistent with Article XIII C of the California Constitution, which bars duplicative levies for identical public benefits. Anaheim must codify a clear prohibition against any "double dip" in both the ordinance and management plan. Such language not only protects hotel operators from inequitable treatment but also shields the City from future audit findings and potential legal challenge under California's Unfair Competition Law. 2. Ensuring all ATID-funded services are equally available to assessed entities, regardless of whether they pay additional private dues to the Contracting Entity. Every business paying the ATID assessment is entitled to the full and fair benefit of those funds —without condition, favoritism, or additional payment. We strongly recommend adding explicit language recognizing all assessed entities as members in good standing of the contracting entity and barring any requirement for additional dues or sponsorship fees. This simple reform will align Anaheim with statewide standards for public -benefit districts and prevent the perception that access to City -subsidized programs can be privately purchased. 3. Requiringformal approvalof allATID componentfund budgets in publicly noticed meetings, with full Brown Act compliance across marketing, housing, and transportation committees. While recent amendments add public transparency for the Transportation and Housing components, the Marketing Component remains insulated from open -meeting requirements. This omission contradicts both the spirit and the letter of the Ralph M. Brown Act, which applies to any body entrusted with the expenditure of public funds. The City should require that all ATID component budgets —Marketing, Housing, and Transportation —be publicly noticed, deliberated, and approved in open session. Anything less perpetuates the opacity the State Auditor explicitly warned against. As former public officials with direct oversight experience in both legislative and auditing capacities, we respectfully urge the Council to view this moment not as a routine contract update, but as an opportunity to set a statewide standard for tourism district accountability. Anaheim has the chance to lead —not follow —in advancing public integrity and restoring trust in how millions in assessments are levied, managed, and disclosed. Anaheim now stands at a crossroads. The City can either reaffirm the integrity of its public finance system or risk repeating the same governance failures that drew statewide scrutiny in 2023. The proposed reforms, if strengthened as recommended above, would elevate Anaheim as a model for Lawful, transparent, and equitable district management —one that both the public and the tourism industry can trust. We appreciate the Council's attention to these issues and remain available to provide any further technical assistance or clarification regarding the audit findings or statutory framework. We are available to provide additional clarification or technical support if needed. Thank you for your attention to these serious and timely issues. Respectfully, Dean Florez President, Balance Public Relations Former Senate Majority Leader, California State Senate Elaine M. Howle Strategic Advisor, Balance Public Relations California State Auditor (Retired) <�' 111,i> ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE October 28, 2025 The Honorable Anaheim City Council 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, 7th Floor Anaheim, California 92805 RE: Agenda Item 26 —Public Meeting on Proposed Modifications to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention Dear Mayor Aitken, Mayor Pro Tern Meeks, and Members of the City Council: On behalf of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, I write in regard to the proposed modifications to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District (ATID) ordinance and management plan. Double -Billing for Transportation Services We urge that there be a prohibition against assessed facilities being required to make duplicate transportation payments/assessments for the same service or circulation system. Transportation Component Funds should not be used to offset or replace existing private or contractual mitigation requirements under any development agreement, conditional use permit, or traffic mitigation measure nor should they be used to impose or continue duplicative obligations on assessed payees. Hotels or developments that have previously satisfied circulation or parking mitigation requirements through private payment, in -lieu fees, or direct service provision should be deemed to have met their obligation for equivalent transportation benefit under the ATID and should not be charged twice through assessment participation. This ensures the ATID Transportation Fund remains a public benefit mechanism, not a revenue replacement vehicle for prior private agreements, and would fulfill the intent of AB 2097 (California Government Code §65863.2) regarding parking or mitigation mandates. These hotels and developments should not be penalized for having simply moved swiftly to reach agreements with the City prior to the January 1, 2023, effective date of AB 2097. Accordingly, we propose that the following be added to the Anaheim Municipal Code as §2.14.110.030: Transportation Component Funds shall not be used to subsidize or duplicate transportation services for which any Assessed Facility is already obligated to pay under a development agreement, mitigation measure, or private service contract, 100 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 345A, Anaheim, CA 92805 T (714) 758-0222 AnaheimChamber.org Anaheim City Council October 28, 2025 Page 2 of 4 including those entered California Government double assessment. into prior to the adoption of Section 65863.2 of the Code. Such duplication constitutes an impermissible We propose that the following be added to Management Plan Section 014 under the "Transportation Activities, Improvements Services and Programs" portion: Transportation Component Funds may not fund ongoing operational costs of any transit operator except for defined public circulation routes serving Assessed Facilities and visitor destinations. Assessed Facilities with pre-existing circulation or mitigation payment obligations shall not be charged duplicatively under this Plan. We propose that the following be added to Management Plan Section 016 under the "Allocation" portion: Transportation Component expenditures shall expressly exclude any project or service for which an Assessed Facility is obligated to pay under a development agreement or mitigation program established prior to the adoption of Section 65863.2 of the California Government Code. We further propose that our proposed Municipal Code §2.14.110.030 be incorporated into Management Plan Section 021 under the "Transportation Component" portion. Double-Billina for Marketina Services Visit Anaheim is engaging in a practice of double -billing the hotels in the ATID. Marketing and promotion services are required to be provided for the ATID. However, Visit Anaheim charges member dues to ATID assessment payers to provide similar services. Hotels that do not pay the member dues are not receiving those services despite paying the ATID assessment. The City should not permit Visit Anaheim to collect private funds to provide services that it already receives for public funding for. Of note, the modifications to the ATID management plan would have Visit Anaheim provide "Advertising and marketing programs supporting the Anaheim Convention Center and Assessed Facilities" and "International and national promotion of tourism, the Assessed Facilities, the Anaheim Convention Center..." The modifications to the ordinance adds to the list of ATID activities to include: "Other activities, services and programs provided for the purpose of conferring specific benefit upon Assessed Facilities located in the district." These amendments to the ordinance and management plan need to require that these services must be provided to ATID payees fairly without regard to whether the payees are paying private member dues to the contracting entity, and/or require that if ATID payees pay private member dues to the contracting entity, then the contracting entity must provide those dues payers specific services that are not already paid for by ATID funds. We propose that the following be added to the Anaheim Municipal Code as §2.14.110.020: Anaheim City Council October 28, 2025 Page 3 of 4 If the Contracting Entity is organized as a nonprofit membership corporation under Section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, all Assessed Facilities paying the assessment shall be considered members in good standing for the term of the assessment. The Contracting Entity shall not charge additional dues, sponsorship fees, membership or participation fees, or access payments for activities, services, or programs funded by the assessment. We further propose that our proposed Municipal Code §2.14.110.020 be incorporated into Management Plan Section 021 under the "Marketing Component" portion. Brown Act and ATID Expenditures We applaud that the management plan modifications create the Housing Committee that will provide recommendations to the City Manager to develop the annual budget of the Housing Component ATID funds for approval by the City Council. We note that the management plan currently has the Transportation Committee approving the annual Transportation Component Funds budget. The management plan designates the City Manager to administer the Transportation Component Funds, and the proposed modifications would similarly designate the City Manager to administer the Housing Component Funds. However, uniquely among the three component funds, the City Manager does not administer the Marketing Component Funds, and no Brown Act body is required to approve the annual budget of the Marketing Component Funds. The ATID Advisory Board (on marketing component funds) has less responsibilities and oversight than either the Transportation Committee or Housing Committee despite the fact that the marketing component is the only one of the three component funds that are not administered by the City. We would urge the City Council to adopt a standard for oversight and approval of the expenditure of ATID Marketing Component Funds that is at least equal to that of the Transportation and Housing Components, rather than the lower standard currently proposed in the modifications to the management plan. The Transportation Committee approves the annual Transportation Component Funds budget in a noticed public meeting under the Brown Act. The City Council approves the annual Housing Component Funds budget in a noticed public meeting under the Brown Act. The management plan ought to require that the Marketing Component Funds be approved in a noticed public meeting under the Brown Act. We propose that the following be added to the Anaheim Municipal Code as §2.14.050.025: The management plan shall include provisions for open public oversight of expenditures and shall require that all component fund budgets be subject to City Council approval at a properly noticed public meeting in accordance with the requirements of Section 54954.6 of the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code Sections 54950-54963). Anaheim City Council October 28, 2025 Page 4 of 4 Public Records Act In the past, many people operated under the theory that the ATID assessment were not public funds. As such, ATID-related records were not considered in the context of the California Public Records Act. It is important to remind Visit Anaheim that the ATID assessment funds are public funds and therefore ATID-related records are subject to the California Public Records Act, and as such, Visit Anaheim is responsible for both records retention and prompt disclosure of records to any person requesting such records related to ATID. Conclusion We urge the City Council to take these above matters into account when approving the modifications to the ATID ordinance and management plan. This is the opportunity to ensure proper responsibility, oversight, and transparency with these public funds. Sincerely, Dara M leki President and Chief Executive Officer From: Emma Burrows <emma@ochotels.org> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 3:55 PM To: City Clerk Cc: Danny Fierro Subject: [EXTERNAL] Orange County Hotel and Lodging Association Letter to Mayor Aitken and City Council Attachments: OCHLA Letter to Anaheim City Council.pdf You don't often get email from emma@ochotels.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. • Good afternoon, • Please find attached a letter from Executive Director Danny Fierro, submitted on behalf of the Orange County Hotel & Lodging Association, for the City Clerk's records. • Best, • Emma Burrows Emma Burrows Director of Member Services i an e Count Hotel & Lodging Association W ORANGECOUNTY HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION 1 AtORANGE COUNTY HOTEL &LODGING ASSOCIATION October 22, 2025 Anaheim City Council c/o City Clerk's Office City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council: On behalf of the Orange County Hotel & Lodging Association, I write to respectfully express our opposition to the proposed parking and entertainment taxes, or "gate taxes", in Anaheim. While we recognize the City's fiscal challenges, adopting new, long-term taxes to address short-term budget gaps would mark a sharp departure from Anaheim's proven, pro -investment approach and risk slowing the very economic engine that drives the City's success. The Anaheim Resort Area is the cornerstone of Anaheim's economy and one of the most important tourism hubs in California. It supports more than 102,000 direct and indirect jobs across Southern California — nearly 75 % of them in Orange County — and sustains hundreds of local businesses through tens of millions of dollars in annual vendor and supplier spending. The Resort Area also serves as the City's single largest funding source, projected to generate approximately $302 million in 2025-26, or 63% of Anaheim's General Fund. Anaheim's success story is built on thoughtful, forward -looking leadership that has cultivated a pro -business environment. This Council has carried on that legacy through initiatives such as DisneylandForward, OCVIBE, and the revitalization of West Anaheim — projects that will deliver lasting financial benefits and community investment in the years ahead. The results of this strategy are clear: Anaheim's transient occupancy (hotel) tax revenue grew from $57.9 million in 2000-01 to $247.6 million in 2023-24 — a more than 400% increase — while the City's population grew only about 5%. When Anaheim encourages investment, the entire community benefits through stable revenues, good jobs, and enhanced public services. Imposing a gate tax now would undercut that momentum. These measures would make Anaheim less competitive with peer destinations like Orlando, San Diego, and Seattle, which ORANGE COUNTY HOTEL AND LODGING ASSOCIATION 8583 IRVINE CENTER DR #476 IRVINE, CA 92618 continue to invest in visitor affordability and experiences. Travelers are increasingly price -sensitive; adding new taxes on visits and experiences risks dampening demand, discouraging future investment, and reducing the very revenues the City depends upon. Moreover, the idea that these taxes would only impact visitors is inaccurate. Data show that more than one-third of Anaheim residents attend events at major venues that would be subject to the proposed entertainment tax — meaning local families would feel the burden directly. If our shared goal is to grow Anaheim's tax base and fund essential services, the proven path is clear: keep Anaheim attractive for investment and visitation. By continuing to support an environment that encourages business growth and tourism, Anaheim can ensure stable revenues without jeopardizing jobs, competitiveness, or community vitality. We urge the Council to reject the proposed parking and/or entertainment taxes and continue pursuing the kind of creative, community -driven solutions — like recent improvements to the Anaheim Tourism Improvement District funding formula — that strengthen our city without increasing the cost of a visit or the burden on residents. Thank you for your leadership and your continued commitment to maintaining Anaheim as a world -class destination and a model for economic growth. Respectfully, Danny Fierro Executive Director From: Cindy Marquez Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 7:37 PM To: City Clerk Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition letter to Agenda Item 27 Attachments: Anaheim Agenda 27.pdf You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To whom it may concern, Please see attached! Cindy Marquez Local 83 1 Omzh" ; �'�ctc'�, �Gacco ��o�em 12631 E. Imperial Hwy., B-109, Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 484-0377 0 Fax: (562) 484-0379 City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Opposition to agenda item 27 parking and entertainment tax in Anaheim Dear Mayor Aitken and councilmembers, BAKERY CONFECTIONEJ BC TOBACCO WORK& GRAINMILE On behalf of BCTGM Local 83, we are writing our opposition to AGENDA ITEM 27, the proposed parking and entertainment tax in Anaheim. We applaud your leadership in putting Anaheim working families first. Over the last couple of years, the council approved historic agreements like the OC VIBE, Disneyland Forward, and a renewal of the city's Community Workforce Agreement. These projects benefit our local community, provide good union jobs, support public safety, and strengthen the city budget. Together, we have made Anaheim a model for Orange County. This council has upheld Anaheim's vision for a high quality of life for residents, a thri\ 111�, environment for business. iiid a welcoming atmosphere for visitors by fostering growth :niid investment. The proposed parking and entertainment tax puts our progress at risk. This proposal jeopardizes Anaheim's economic future, puts an extra financial burden on working families, slows investment in the city, and puts our jobs at risk. At a time of economic uncertainty, we must work together to bolster our local economy. Disneyland Resort, Angels Baseball, the OC VIBE, and several resort area businesses employ union workers, and are key to Anaheim's economic engine working successfully. Our goal is to keep Anaheim a city where working families continue to thrive; services are fully funded, and our economic base remains stable. We support your commitment to working families and unions in Anaheim. We stand ready to work with you in continuing our progress. We respectfully urge you to reject the proposed tax and continue the policies that have delivered jobs, opportunities, and reliable revenue for Anaheim. Sincerely, CiM dZ6 MaU LAR ,- --Financial Secretary Treasurer/Business Agent From: Alexander Rossitto <aj@calodging.com> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 11:54 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] CA Hotel + Lodging Assn. - Comment Letter - ITEM 27 - OPPOSE Attachments: Anaheim Gate Tax Opposition Letter - 10.27.2025.pdf You don't often get email from aj@calodging.com. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Anaheim Mayor and City Council, Please see the attached letter from the California Hotel + Lodging Association opposing Item 27 — the gate and parking tax proposal. Respectfully, A.J. Rossitto Advocacy Director Direct: 916 554-2677 California Hotel + Lodeine Association 414 29th St., Sacramento, CA 95816 1 LYNN S. MOHRFELD President + CEO OFFICERS CHAIR CORMAC O'MOOHRAIN Sunstone Hotel Investors Aliso Viejo VICE CHAIR KRISTI ALLEN Ensemble Investments Long Beach SECRETARY/TREASURER TOM PATTON Ramada by Wyndham Santa Barbara PAST CHAIR DHRUV PATEL Ridgemont Hospitality Oakland Protecting the rights and interests of the California hotel industry 414 29TH STREET ..SACRAMENTO.,.CA. 95816-3211 916.444.5780 www.calodging.com October 27, 2025 Anaheim City Council 200 S Anaheim Boulevard 7th Floor Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: ITEM 27 — OPPOSE — Placement of a Tourism Tax Measure and Parking Tax Measure on the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election Ballot Dear Mayor Aitken and City Councilmembers: On behalf of the members of the California Hotel + Lodging Association, CHLA respectfully expresses our OPPOSITION to AGENDA ITEM 27, the proposed parking and entertainment tax in Anaheim. While we understand the City's fiscal challenges, imposing a long-term tax which raises prices and thereby decreases demand could slow the economic engine that drives Anaheim's success. Currently, hotels in Anaheim are already experiencing softening demand and are hosting less visitors year-to-date than last year compared to the entire state, which has seen a slight increase in demand through September. The Anaheim Resort Area (ARA) is one of the main economic engines of the City's economy and supports more than 102,000 direct and indirect jobs across Southern California — nearly 75% of them in Orange County. In the fiscal year 2025-26, the Resort Area alone is projected to generate $302 million in tax revenue, approximately 63% of Anaheim's General Fund. This extraordinary figure has grown substantially as businesses continue to invest in the Resort Area. Further, by driving tourism demand from around the world, ARA sustains hundreds of small businesses which are directly involved in hospitality or support the operation of the region's tourism industry by offering goods and services, construction and development support, transportation services, and more. The value of these benefits total tens of millions of dollars in local supplier and vendor spending each year. This new tax proposal represents a sharp departure from Anaheim's long-standing and successful pro -investment policies whereby the city invests in demand development and instead substitutes a growth -inhibitor which risks weakening the city's competitiveness as a premier travel and entertainment destination. Other cities that are competitors to Anaheim continue to invest in demand development via refinement of the visitor experience, infrastructure development, and affordability programs. Adding new taxes in Anaheim would risk shifting group bookings, conventions, and family travel to those markets, reducing visitation and undercutting immediate downstream spending and future tax revenues. We respectfully urge the Council to reject the proposed parking and entertainment taxes and continue the policies that have made Anaheim a model for economic growth and a pillar of California's tourism economy. Sincerely, Lynn S. Mohrfeld President + CEO California Hotel + Lodging Association From: Cyntia Pena Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 2:36 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Tourism Tax and Parking Tax You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear City Council, I think the residents should vote whether or not we impose a new tax. I support the Anaheim Tourism Tax because the Disney resort area has a lot of traffic. It needs proper maintenance, traffic control, and security so the high traffic doesn't negatively affect the residents who live in the area. The language of new taxes should be transparent and clear. We want to know where the tax money is going towards. And have a committee that watches how the money is spent. The money should be used to improve the residents lives. Don't need to give more to law enforcement. They have plenty. This money should be for residents. Cyntia Pena Please consider the environment before printing this message. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, including attachments, contains information that is considered confidential. The information is intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not an addressee, your disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and then delete this entire message. Thank you. From: Angeles Ochoa Carmona <aochoa@occord.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 2:36 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] 10/28/25 Council Meeting Item #27 Public Comment Attachments: Item 27 Public Comment - 10_28 Council Meeting.pdf You don't often get email from aochoa@occord.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good afternoon, Please see attached. Angeles Ochoa Carmona Digital Organizer aochoaCd)occord.org V CC V n D www.occord.org BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER 1505 E 17th St, Suite 122, Santa Ana, CA 92705 1 October 28, 2025 Agenda Item #27 Public Comment Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, I am writing as the Digital Organizer with OCCORD to express my strong support for Item 27 — the Tourism and Parking Tax measures. Through my work, I work closely with Anaheim residents in our Neighborhood Unions — families in the Guinida, Pauline Street, and Ponderosa neighborhoods — who are fighting for safer streets, affordable housing, and stronger community services. Every day, these families feel the strain of a city budget that struggles to meet basic needs. We need a budget that reflects the people who make Anaheim run — residents, workers, and neighborhood leaders — so they can finally share in the prosperity they help create. That's why the Tourism and Parking Tax measures matter. Right now, Anaheim's largest entertainment venues — Disneyland, the Honda Center, and Angel Stadium -- benefit from our roads, public safety, and the everyday labor of our residents. Yet Anaheim collects no ticket or parking tax from these venues. Disneyland alone attracts over 27 million visitors a year, and the City receives revenue only from sales tax on food and merchandise — not from ticket sales. Meanwhile, our neighborhoods face broken sidewalks, aging parks, and rising rents. The proposed Tourism and Parking Taxes would change that — by adding a modest 3% on ticket sales and 10% on paid parking at major venues. Together, these measures could generate up to $160 million every year for Anaheim's General Fund — without raising costs for residents. A 3% tax adds only $4.50 to a $150 Disneyland ticket — barely noticeable to visitors, but transformative for Anaheim neighborhoods. But let me be clear: This revenue must go into community needs — not into expanding policing. Residents already see how much of our General Fund is consumed by police spending, while community services and programs fall behind and families face increasing instability. Real safety comes from stable housing, safe public spaces, and strong youth programs — not from over -policing our neighborhoods. In 2022, when Anaheim considered a 2% gate tax, opponents raised concerns that the tax could force ticket price increases. Yet even without any tax, Disneyland has continued to raise ticket prices year after year, and the City still receives no revenue from admission sales —meaning residents bear the costs while the companies benefit. These types of taxes are not new — and they work. Seattle collects a 5% admissions tax to support arts and culture. Cleveland's 8% and Chicago's 9% taxes fund essential public services. Anaheim's 3% proposal is far more modest by comparison, but because of the scale of our tourism economy, it would still deliver extraordinary benefits. And to be clear, this is not a vote to impose a tax tonight. It is a vote to let Anaheim voters decide whether corporations should finally contribute their fair share. This is about fairness, transparency, and democratic accountability. Our Neighborhood Unions expect to see a city that invests in them as much as it invests in tourism. On their behalf, I urge you to move these measures to the November 2026 ballot so residents — not special interests — have the final say. Let's ensure Anaheim's economic strength lifts everyone — not just the few at the top. Thank you, Angeles Ochoa Carmona Digital Organizer Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD) From: Ivon Pena <ipena@occord.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 2:53 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment- Item 27 Attachments: Public Comment for Item 27 Gate Tax Ivon Pena, Interim Co -Executive Director, OCCORD 10_28_2025.pdf You don't often get email from ipena@occord.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please find my public comment for tonight's council meeting attached below. Thank you. Best, Ivon Ivon Pena Interim Co -Executive Director /"� n ipenaCa)occord.or Vg CCOR D https://www.occord.org/ BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER 1505 E 17th St. Suite 122, Santa Ana, CA 92705 1 Item 27 Public Comment — Ivon Pena, Interim Co -Executive Director, OCCORD Anaheim City Council Meeting — October 28, 2025 Good evening, Mayor and Councilmembers. My name is Ivon Pena, and I serve as the Interim Co -Executive Director of OCCORD (Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development.) For nearly twenty years, OCCORD has worked alongside Anaheim families to ensure that the people who make this city run, our residents, workers, and neighborhood leaders, also share in its prosperity. Tonight, I'm here to urge you to place the proposed Tourism and Parking Tax measures on the November 2026 ballot and give Anaheim voters —not corporations —the right to decide. Every day, our communities feel the strain of a city budget stretched thin. Parks go unrepaired, housing becomes less affordable, and youth programs disappear, all while billion -dollar entertainment corporations like Disneyland, the Honda Center, and Angel Stadium benefit from city resources without paying an admissions or parking tax and continue to raise prices. That's why this measure matters. It's about fairness, accountability, and community reinvestment. A modest 3% Tourism Tax on ticket sales and a 10% Parking Tax on large private lots could generate up to $160 million each year for Anaheim's General Fund. But let's be clear —our support for this measure comes with a call for responsibility: This new revenue must go back to the community, not to expand already oversized police budgets. Anaheim residents deserve to see these funds invested in: • Affordable housing and pathways to homeownership, • Green spaces and parks that families can safely enjoy, • Youth programs and libraries that strengthen our neighborhoods, and • Infrastructure improvements that make our city more livable and sustainable. We know what happens when new revenue comes in— it is often claimed by departments that already receive the largest share of the budget. As community advocates, we will continue to ensure that this money uplifts working families, not deepens inequality. A 3% tax would add just $4.50 to a $150 Disneyland ticket —a small amount for visitors, but a transformational investment for our residents/communities. Cities like Seattle, Cleveland, and Chicago already use similar taxes to reinvest in people and neighborhoods. Anaheim deserves the same. And to be clear, this is not a vote to impose a tax tonight —it is a vote to let the people of Anaheim decide in 2026 whether corporations that profit most from this city should finally contribute their fair share. On behalf of OCCORD and the communities we serve —from Guinida to Pauline Street to Ponderosa —I urge you to move these measures forward. Let's ensure Anaheim's economic engine works for everyone —not just a few corporations —and that the revenue it generates truly comes home to the people. Thank you. Ivon Pena, Interim Co -Executive Director, OCCORD From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey Wednesday, October 15, 2025 5:57 PM [EXTERNAL] CBS News: New study on social media and test scores -- CBS News Live News Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. WATCH: New study on social media and test scores https://www.cbsnews.com/video/study-reveals-connection-between-kids-social-media-usage-lower- test-scores/ See more CBS News video, a free live news stream featuring original CBS News reporting: https://www.cbsnews.com/live/ From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey Thursday, October 16, 2025 4:07 PM [EXTERNAL] School screen -time limit hailed as device cost queried Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: School screen -time limit hailed as device cost queried - https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/austratia/primary-school-students-to-get-90-minute- screen-limit/ar-AA1 Oy8J8?ocid=socialshare From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey Saturday, October 18, 2025 8:56 AM [EXTERNAL] Opinion: Teens, screens, pressures, parenting - and prevention Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Opinion: Teens, screens, pressures, parenting - and prevention - https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/opinion-teens-screens- pressures-parenting-and-prevention/ar-AA1 N2laQ?ocid=socia[share From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey [EXTERNAL] Fwd: ScreenShots: Al & Kids, Free 0-5 Guide, and "What We're Reading" Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Children and Screens<screenShots(o)childrenandscreens.org> Date: Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:08 AM Subject: ScreenShots: Al & Kids, Free 0-5 Guide, and "What We're Reading" To: Children Screens Institute of Digital Media and Child Development SCREENSHOTS 1 r he Desk Mr.,.. Al, Kids, and Safety Artificial intelligence is leaping from labs into nurseries, classrooms, and living rooms, often outpacing essential childhood development research. I'm proud to live in California, a state leading with safer -by -design rules, transparency, and stronger protections. Such policies are essential as Al reaches younger audiences, while long-term child development research is still underway. Kris Perry, Executive Director 0�1 Listen C��Mentions • Parents increasingly recognize how family screen time shapes child development - but that awareness can bring guilt or shame when digital devices creep into daily life. In episode "The Stricter the Cellphone Policy, the Happier the Teacher, Research Finds." EdSurge, October 2025. 21 of Screen Deep, Media, Stress, and the Parent -Child Relationship, leading researcher Lara Wolfers, PhD talks with host Kris Perry about when guilt can be constructive versus when it can be harmful to the parent -child relationship. She offers suggestions for navigating societal pressures and daily demands, and encourages parents to practice self -compassion. Missed earlier episodes? Visit the Screen Deep archive. Children and Screens filed formal comments urging the FTC to make children's privacy and safety a core priority in its 2026-2030 "Many teens are turning to Al chatbots for friendship and emotional support." American Psychological Association, October 2025. "Al is coming for our babies — putting their brains at risk." The New York Post, September 2025. "Here's how to help kids deal with current events and the sometimes violent imagery they bring." The Associated Press, September 2025. From the Outdoor Play Canada published its 2025 Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play, breaking down the benefits of outdoor play for 3 Strategic Plan - calling for stronger COPPA enforcement with dedicated child -safety staff, outcome -based measures for harm reduction, closer scrutiny of deceptive marketing to kids, and proactive guidance on emerging tech like Al chatbots. We also cited recent enforcment cases to underscore why robust oversight matters for families. people, communities, environments, and the planet. The statement was co -signed by Children and Screens. Fairplay released Teen Accounts, Broken Promises: How Instagram is Failing to Protect Minors, documenting the shortfalls of Instagram's safety features for teen accounts on its platform. The New Essential Resource for Parents and Children Ages 0-5 New for Parents of Children 0-5: Free Science -Based Guide to Screens in Early Childhood Raising little ones in an always online world is tough. Our free, "Early Child Development and Media Use" guide brings together clear, research -backed advice from leading experts to help you build healthy habits from infancy through preschool. 4 Whab -WADING We're IL "Screen Time and Standardized Academic Achievement Tests in Elementary School." JAMA Network Open, October 2025. "Structure and stability of internet gaming disorder from childhood to late adolescence: A 5-wave birth cohort study." Addiction, September 2025. "Parental Internet -Specific Rules and the Onset of Adolescents' Problematic Social Media Use: Prospective Study Testing Potential Moderators." Journal of Medical Internet Research, September 2025. Updates It's been an eventful month in Washington, D.C. On October 1, the federal government shut down, but not before Senate hearings examined the harms of Al chatbots and fresh Meta whistleblower claims, prompting our call for more transparent, independent research on technology and digital media. Meanwhile, several key state actions advanced: updates to pending child safety legislation and bills signed into law establishing stronger Al guardrails and safety protocols for developers and Al companions used by minors. 5 WEBINAR SHORT: Sharenting, Age, and Child Privacy From the #AskTheExperts webinar "Overshare? What You Need To Know About Parent Sharenting and Child Privacy." In this webinar, Stacey Steinberg, JD (Legal Skills Professor, University of Florida, Levin College of Law) discussed how a child's age and developmental stage should guide what parents post about them online - and shared simple tips to ask for consent from children of different ages. • Our Work Your gift ensures that groundbreaking science doesn't stay in the lab -it reaches families, educators, and decision -makers who need it most. By donating today, you'll fuel future convenings, free educational resources, and collaborative research that drives real -word change. Every contribution strengthens our nonpartisan mission to safeguard children's health and well-being in the digital age. Together, we can turn knowledge into action and build a healthier digital future for kids everywhere. P Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development 1 276 5th Avenue Suite 704, Box #900 1 New York, NY 10001 US h.-.,rihl. I IA o+r. nr.,+;In f- +o n+ f-ran++ no+o 1\I+i_r. CC;Constant Contact Try email marketing for free today! 7 From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] Watch "#hey dude you're a dud! Good Vibes all right okay No Satisfaction alright, ok Right ladies" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] LEWD act ! HUH? LOU Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Thursday, October 16, 2025 4:18 PM [EXTERNAL] Watch "#prejudice is still alive Fullerton California" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] #playing games with my items stealing them putting them back Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Sunday, October 19, 2025 4:34 PM [EXTERNAL] these people are going to bring the heat on themselves Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] stealing items for my car Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] this is how ignorant you people are ! Anaheim City Council Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. these are the kind of people you got in government jobs City officials just like Fred Jung the mayor of Fullerton ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(cbooglemail.com> Date: Mon, Oct 20, 2025, 6:30 AM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: Address not found Your message wasn't delivered to confirmations@godaddy.com because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail. LEARN MORE AThis link will take you to a third -party site The response from the remote serverwas: 550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. For more information see https://aka.ms/EXOSmtpErrors[CHIPEPFOOOOAD81.namprd04.prod.outlook.com 2025-10- 20T13:30:59.531Z 08DEOD9739EC93EF] Bcc: Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:30:47 -0700 Subiect: Anaheim Dublic comment mocking me From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2025 1:35 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bringing your tax dollars back to you —even during the shutdown Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. LOU CORREA ; DOWN70wN ��ti?►� (iEtANGE C iIC REPRESENTATIVE CALIFORNIA'S 46 " DISTRICT it r Dear Neighbor, This week marked the second week of the longest ever total government shutdown. Millions of Americans nationwide are continuing to be impacted by this shutdown, and I am standing with each and every one of you. Here at home, I was thrilled to celebrate the federal tax dollars I secured for Anaheim's Sustainable Education Center's workforce development programs. As I bring your stories to the halls of Congress, I wanted to take a moment to show you what I've been working on. I also celebrated the opening of the City of Anaheim Sustainability Education Center (SEC) for Education and Workforce Development. Thanks to $3,000,000 in community project funding I secured for the City of Anaheim, the SEC will help students enter the 21 st century job market. This funding supports workforce development to open pathways to engineering, environmental studies, construction, and resource planning. I'll keep fighting for long term solutions that set up Orange County's next generation of workers for success. 1 Congressman Correa celebrated $3 million in community project funding he secured for workforce development I also wanted to update you all on upcoming changes to health care premium rates.Orange County families can expect to see significant increases to their health care premium rates starting in 2026. 1 voted against the GOP's One Big Ugly Bill, because included historic cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and did not extend enhanced premium tax credits under the Affordable Care Act. Congressional Democrats have continued pressing to protect the Affordable Care Act enhanced premium tax credits, which ensure that 23,000 CA-46 residents are covered. I wanted to reach out to you and see if you or a loved one are affected by the upcoming health care premium cost changes, you can submit your story LOU -a RREAa�W�, RE PBe3EhhTlil4f n.CA4.ii 6fi Nik S;V-0hiTRICT qqE %!tin FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: OClobei 16. 2325 LOCK OUT_ ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE PREMIUMS SET TO INCREASE DUE TO BIG UGLY BILL Correa seated agarnsr the ArXrninesirar+o i s s: -':_ .ng n ,, Mat •nc�jdecll isloac curs to aeafrn care onwims tax credrts rarrrlhes,n Orange Cowley noWcan exnr:r:r :;'r ; ..r 'Wes by thousands each "err - SANTA ANA. Calif. —Orange County families can expect to == �: gnifican l increases to Sher hearth care premium rates starling in 2028 because pf 1he Trump Adminis'ra• ,D l a <�w ft Ugry a3trf which passed Congress earri this summer and incuded hislohc cuts to Medicare Medicaid. and did not extend enhanced premium lax credits under the Aftdrea: S,P Act —hat Congressman Lou Correa SCA 46;i voted against V,4b1 markMoface open enro!imenl t:e,:;,,,.,ng in November. Correa is raising ararms about signirttant premium InUaaSaS that could t451 f.wl of in 0-' -.1 morn thaA S7 200 Path year. `T$uc8n7pCvi'I[A'LV77rt481'-^.^.,"C?n••r•-. -' ,,.a:'e rhea Car9.'la#rAm@f.rAa4 f was seah.Tr6lMwopCp'n to make a driVeue In my C ,? :': Sbee i ` ead l4ft-1 These rate rcreases go into e-rect. many fam,bes4vhrseuna t�.:: .Qaflen ;y%,,sureC klrp.Correa sald. On ocwter 151h.. Caillumla released the hearh 'n ra1e5!: , r",e Olreuming 2f}26 yeer While rate increases may vary fromhousehgdd to household. Rr a..Me homily �F,, 461h 051flO could see then rages increase by nearly $607 0CII month, tdtaling to o,.e, each ;s::. "•Ith markeloiate ripen enrdrnenl beginning on November 1. families are no%vable It n ore,�I— -RIPS .,•ill charge in the upcoming year Eaeause Congress was unable to pass an appropr'.A:w, soiulion to keep the government funded. the federal goveirnM ili had been Shut d&rM to' :_a'id C.orlgrP>S 3Gnal Oemotral5 have Continued preS 111010 protect the AfrCT'4a't�e Care AcrenhanCeo WY ni lax. Credits, Y,,hlCli ensure Mal..23.000 CA-46 residents are covered. YMAL, some rav+makers have been ocsnurp for the passage of a three week continuing resolurron. Correa is askPlg vrhy Congress needs another continuing resolution. -INB Ve Jean Mcummg ACA G. nemnums For a ery WV Gina reds Z rite rr.7Ad Nw tar av Amerrcar�s a�nas etc roes guh•emmenr snuidblan. Correa sa+0. •a.!r rtarzr saparnri9 raxGay�rB ueser<�e ro gee rraf care they nesolss ',r . e ea ung me Jank 7emem ler nlea3ea+ 4++os are," roe reason dmencans 6,v; far raanerM�ancy ;, .: - - _ _..re;5 xu,.raeresl roar rhe come rnerand da whams pesrfa-a�drrrencarA1, Correa Skid. To See Y.hal _'7 ..:i ;ale increase vrill look like, diCkHERE. No I also celebrated Orange County's Children's Therapeutic Arts Center's 25th anniversary. OCCTAC has served Santa Ana and Orange County, prioritizing those with disabilities from diverse backgrounds. Through non-traditional therapies, OCCTAC has successfully helped countless families across our communities. Our neurodivergent neighbors deserve therapies that work, keep up the good work! C;ongressman C;orrea celeDratect UC;C; IAC; s Z,)M Anniversary Are you looking for a new position, or maybe your first job? Does working for a state or local agency, nonprofit organization, or small business sound like an exciting opportunity? Consider joining my team on Friday, October 24th at our Job Fair to build connections and find your next role. Registration is required, so use the QR code on the flier or click to reserve your spot. If you have any questions about this event, please don't hesitate to reach out to my Santa Ana office at (714) 559-6190. LUU Q 19RH REPRESENTATIVE/&vCALIFORNIA'S 46T" ICIR IPA I� A'W "4 Avelino Valencia I Sharon Quirk -Silva E-q)' ASSEMBLVWDMAN, DISTRICT 67 REGISTRATION REQUIRED SCAN: QR CODE 0 PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS: • FEDERAL AGENCIES • STATE AGENCIES • NONPROFITS • COMPANIES • SMALL BUSINESSES 9DCorrea.house.gov�& @RepLouCorrea lu I0 As always, I am committed to serving you, advocating for issues that matter to our community, and connecting you to important resources. If you are experiencing any issues with a federal agency, my office is here to help. Give us a call at (714) 559-6190. 5 Sincerely, OKI Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! Sign U ! " CfZyZoZ�7 Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. 2082 Rayburn House Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Office Building Community College Building Washington, DC 20515 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2025 10:00 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Share your Health Care Story Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. r DOWNTOWNOU CRREA! ;A ORANG~ COUNTY 1' REPRESENTATIVE/,wCALIFORNIA'S 46" DISTRICT q! Dear Neighbor, As you may already know, the federal government is currently shut down because Congress is unable to agree on affordable health care. The fight in Washington today is whether to extend federal health care tax credits. Starting in January, millions of Americans will see their health care premiums increase. Here in Central Orange County, people receive federal health care subsidies and will be impacted directly I wanted to reach out to you and see if you or a loved one are affected by the upcoming health care premium cost changes. You can submit your story Americans deserve a functioning government that doesn't neglect health care. As we consider this topic in Congress, I want to hear from you. �OMIMITS101[91NO Will the upcoming health care premium cost increases impact your family? Yes I01re, Taking this survey will sign you up for future news and updates from our office. 1 Throughout the shutdown, my office will remain open and my staff stands ready to assist all of our constituents with matters dealing with federal agencies. If you have any questions, or need assistance, you can call my office directly at: (714) 559-6190. As I work with my colleagues in Congress to protect health care, I will keep your thoughts in mind. My job is to bring your voice to Washington, and I want to continue hearing from you as Congress considers taking action. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! �rOo Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. 1039 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. Q From: Jim Hankins Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2025 2:36 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Protesting the fatal shooting of Rudy Anthony Martinez II by Anaheim police You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I object in the strongest possible terms to the killing of Rudy Anthony Martinez II outside of John Marshall Elementary School in Anaheim. This fatal police shooting was carried out on Sept. 15, 2025 while children were inside the school, literally a stone's throw away from the intersection of Falmouth and Holly streets. The bullets fired by the police officer were not only a danger to the children in the school but also a threat to the residents of the surrounding neighborhood. The shooting took place in a densely populated urban area. It's well known that bullets fired from guns can travel long distances and penetrate the walls of homes, killing people inside. It was not necessary to kill Mr. Martinez to protect the children in the school or the surrounding community. The school could have been locked down. The neighbors in the immediate vicinity could have been warned to stay inside and lock their doors. Strictly speaking, even the police officer who fired the fatal shots did not need to use his gun in self- defense because no one forced him to approach Mr. Martinez, who was reportedly "armed" with a shovel and possibly carrying a brick. There is no reason that the officer could not have just kept driving or stayed inside his vehicle. Police could have cordoned off the area and kept themselves and the public safe while waiting for Mr. Martinez to calm down. They could have summoned mental health professionals or even sought out Mr. Martinez's family members to appeal to him to peacefully surrender. Firing bullets and endangering hundreds of lives was not the only option. James Hankins Anaheim resident From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2025 12:56 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Has your travel been impacted by the government shutdown? Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. r DOWNTOWNOU CRREA! ;A ORANG~ COUNTY 1. REPRESENTATIVE/,wCALIFORNIA'S 46 " DISTRICT W. 1: Dear Neighbor, As you may already know, the federal government is currently shut down. During the shutdown, federal employees including air traffic controllers, TSA workers, and other airport personnel are required to work without pay. Since the shutdown, airports across the nation have experienced from staffing shortages. I wanted to reach out to you and see if your travel has been affected by the government shutdown. You can submit your story Americans deserve a functioning government that keeps airports moving so that travel runs smoothly. As we consider this topic in Congress, I want to hear from you. I WANT YOUR OPINION: Has your travel been impacted by the government shutdown? Yes No Taking this survey will sign you up for future news and updates from our office. 1 Throughout the shutdown, my office will remain open and my staff stands ready to assist all of our constituents with matters dealing with federal agencies. If you have any questions, or need assistance, you can call my office directly at: (714) 559-6190. I will keep your thoughts in mind. My job is to bring your voice to Washington, and I want to continue hearing from you as Congress considers taking action. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! � O o Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. 1039 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. Q From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 1:49 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Medicare's open enrollment period is open! Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. r DOWNTOWNOU CRREA! ;A ORANG~ COUNTY 1' REPRESENTATIVE/,wCALIFORNIA'S 46" DISTRICT W.1: q! Dear Anaheim, Important healthcare news: Medicare's open enrollment period started this month. From now until December 7th, those already enrolled in Medicare can make changes to their current health plan, so it's important to review which plans best fit your health needs. The right Medicare plan puts you in control of your health —and it can mean big savings if you take insulin and or need a vaccine. If your plan sends you an " " (ANOC), make sure to review these to ensure you're still satisfied with your coverage. You can get started by comparing plans . Even if you are not changing your plan, it's important to make sure your information is up to date —especially if you experienced any big life changes, such as marriages or divorces. If you are eligible to join Medicare, now is the time to review all of the different plans offered. You could even qualify for "Extra Help" if you make less than $23,475 per year ($31,725 for married couples). This program could cut your Medicare Part D drug costs to no more than $4.90 for generic prescriptions and $12.15 for brand -name drug prescriptions. More information on this program is available But please remember: Medicare will never call to ask for your Medicare Number, unless you contact Medicare first. If an unknown caller contacts you during the Medicare open enrollment period and 1 asks for your Medicare Number, hang up and call 1-800-MEDICARE. You can find more information on what to do if you suspect Medicare fraud It's important to have a health plan and prescription drug coverage that suits your needs —don't forget to take advantage of this open enrollment period to review your plans. If my office can be of service to you or your family, or if you have any questions about the ongoing Medicare open enrollment period, please do not hesitate to call my Santa Ana office at (714) 559-6190. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! :fZyZoZ�7 Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. 1039 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. Q