72R-100
~
RESOLUTION NO. 72R-IOO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 1244. IN PART.
WHEREAS. the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit
from CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS
CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, 10 South Main, Room 214, Salt Lake
City, Utah, 84111, mmer; SHm'lCASE HOI'lES, 14482 Beach Boulevard,
suite W, westminster, California, 92683, agent, to establish a
47-unit planned residential condominium development on the follow-
ong described property:
The North 5.00 acres of the South 10.00 acres of the
West half of the Northwest quarter of the Southwest
quarter of Section 28, Township 4 South, Range 10
West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, partly in the City of
Anaheim and partly in the City of Garden Grove, in the
County of Orange, State of California, as per map
recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in
the office of the County Recorder of said County.
EXCEPT that portion t~ereof described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said North 5.00
acres; thence North 00 56' 10" West 84.43 feet along
the West line of said sec,tion; thence North 890 IS' 37"
East 248.00 feet parallel with the South line of said
North 5.00 acres; thence South 00 56' 10" East 84.43
feet parallel with said West line to said South line;
thence South 890 15 I 37" I'Jest 248.00 feet to the point
of beginning.
,{"""-
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City o~ Anaheim upon
said application on --f:ehrl1J'Jry 7 ,19 72, notices of '
which said public heilring were duly given as required by law
and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim
MUnicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, in-
vestigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing did adopt its Resolution ~o. PC j2-1l Series
, iJcmyi ng Conditioaal Use erm t No. 1244
and
-1-
,..-.
Y!mEm~AS, t{lcreafter, 'vi thin twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its mm motion, to review the action of the
City Planning ConL~ission in denying said conditional use permit
and did therew.Jon fix the 7th day of [.1arci1, 1972, and continued
to the 21st day of March, 1972, as the time and the Council
Chamber in t11e City Hall of the City of Anaheim as the place for
a public hearing upon said conditional use permit, and notices
of such public hearing were duly given as r~quired by law and
the provisions of Title 18., Chanter 18.76 of the Anaheim Hunicipal
Code; and
~~EREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
WHEP~AS, the City Council finds, after careful considera-
tion of the recommendations of the City Planning Coramission and
all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a
conditional use permit is authorized by the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development
of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the
use is adequate to allow the full development of
the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways
designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under
the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of
the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Com-
mission denying said conditional use permit be, and the same
is hereby disa~proved and that Conditional Use Permit No. 1244
be, and the s~~ is hereby granted, in part, permitting the
establishment of a 47-'unit planned residential condominium
development on the property hereinbefore described, with waivers
of the following Anaheim Municipal Code provisions:
SECTION 18.08.440
Requirement that a lot have
frontage on a dedicated street
(proposed condominium lots would
not have access or frontage on
a dedicated public street)
,:t'~.
-2-
"~
,;-
vlPH: hI
SECTION 18.28.050(1-a)
!'linimum building site area (7200
square feet required; 1609 square
feet to 2248 square feet proposed)
That said conditional use permit be granted subject to the
following conditions:
1. That this conditional use permit is granted subject
to the completion of Reclassification No. 70-71-56 and Tentative
Map of Tract No. 7439, now pending.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall
be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be
recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
3. Prior to filing of the final tract map, the
Applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or
denial a complete synopsis of t~e proposed functioning of the
operating corporation, including but not limited to the articles
of incorporation, by-laws, proposed methods of management,
bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings,
and SUC_l oth2r information as the City Attorney may desire to
protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the pro-
ject.
4. 'rhat t:16 covenants, conditions, and restrictions
shall be submitted to and a:9proved by the City Attorney's Office
prior to City Council approval of the final tract map, and,
further, that the apDroved covenants, conditions, and restrictions
shall be r0.corded concurrently ',vitll the final tract map.
:). That sui::j,,,,ct pro")erty shall be developed substan-
tlally in accordance with plans and specifications on file with
tile Ci t? of Anaheim marked Ex::i~:!i ts Nos. 1, 2, 3; 4 I 5, 6 I 7 I
3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15, 17 and 18.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such
Conditional Use Permit for aood cause or failure of said owner,
its successors or assiqns tC; comnl\! with the Anaheim Hunicioal Code
." - -'-
and regulations and the conditions herein.
1'HE FOREGOIllG RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
thlS 21st day of March, 1972.
ATTEST:
OF ANAHEIM
-3--
J,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORfu~GE ) 55.
CITY OF ANAHEI1'1 )
-
I, DENE ~1. DAOUST , City C1er;<;: of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 72R-IOO was
paased and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held
on the 21st day of March , 1972 , by the following
vote of the members thereof: ---
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and
Dutton
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said resolution on the 21st day of
March , 19 72 .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 21st day of
March , 19 72 .
ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
1, DENE M. DAOUST, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do
h~reby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No.
7~~-100 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
M4rch 21, 1972.
~)t~
City Clerk
-
-,\