04/15/1930-034r
IN THE MATTER OF PAVING SOUTH PALM STREET
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
, ION 0 ' AWARD OF CONTRACT
WHEREAB, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did, in
p # Y p pl`Cly open
open session on the 8tt da` of A pr il `` 1.938 , examine
and declare all' seed proposal.k `or bide for ding 4 the f6l'16ii ng work
in said city, to -wi
All that certai work and 'improvement ', bet forth In Resoluti
of Intention No , . p eed' acid , °adepted .by e aity Ooumoil of said
city on the 11th dap of`February, 1930 which Resolution of Intention
is on file in' the , ne °O'lty Ole k `df- 01 ®i'by, "A -I a --hereby
referred to :for a A ti +a ' °of said work- and- i rovemeat arid..
also for a description of the assessment 'dibtAet -1 able is he. assessed
therefor, and for rt'nei < `particiAite:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE80LP by `saidl ity' Co uncil that it
reject, and ii "does : horel6t reject; all of'' said proposals or bids
except that neat herein mentioned, and hereby °!d►t rich the contract` for
doing said work an c improvement `to the'lowest responsible `bidder,' `
to -wit: _.
!7 Soiq a4 d RkI s at the prices named in
ra
0
0
04
i!
a
ai
�Clr p roposal dated April 8 a*
y
The City Clerk of said city is hereby _'��i "reoted to publish a.
hotice of this award twice in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper
published and circulated in said city and hereby designated for that
purpose by said City Council. And return bonds to the unsuccessful bidders
The foregoing Resolution is approved and signed this /-S
day of 1930,
— Ta'yorof the City 01 Anan elm.
Attest:
City Clerk of the Ci of Anaheim.
4
n
At a meeting of representatives of the
municipalities of Anaheim, Beverly Hills, Burbank,
Colton, Fullerton, Glendale, Newport, Pasadena,
Riverside, San Bernardino and Santa Ana, with
Northcutt Ely, Executive Assistant to the Secretary
of the Interior, on April 7, 1930, at 10,a. m., in
the offices of The Metropolitan Water District, the
following action was taken:
1. Pursuant to resolution unanimously
adopted March 31, 1930, which allocated Boulder Dam
primary energy available to the above municipalities
( of the total generated) among them in proportion
to their 1929 consumption, and which directed a
committee I consisting of representatives of Pasadena,
Beverly Hills and San Bernardino to determine the
respective figures for the eleven municipalities
1929 consumption, this committee, under the chair-
manship of Mr. B. F. DeLanty of Pasadena, reported
as follows:
I
f
O w '
Fly
P, CH -q O !
P a +a o o
,
'd O u) O
0 W
Q
0
Q
O
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
G
0
Q
0
0'
C3
C7
Q) 4-- w
4-: •H W 0
Q
"14
0
CO
to
C)
CO
6 i
C�
tom-
tf�
(3)
In
«u
rn
O
C,
(7
�? C7
C J
C7
(D
Q0
m
Ci)
to
C)
to
dt
0
to
L4.)
LrJ
CZ}
f7' '
0
4- Q CI O;
w
.r
is {
U! �
a' rd v° {
F Lo,
W
to
V)
co
r :)
Ln
r
to
o i
t`
H9
r
O
'd .a i -v,
��
O
C�
Cis
1
d�
c1Z
d
6
CO
to
:,'.)
L-
trJ
:Q
t`
CO
cD
t`
r.P
(Q
C.0
CO'
cD
t.0
Ok
'd U'
to
C;,
H
to
nl
L`)
,-i
w� ,
w
C
fll r4 J
Gl
V it
-F,,•
o
�t
O4-:
? r I }
CO
a)
1
L .
L`
if)
cD
v+
C1�
cn
CC.1
`N
C1
to
-14
V)
r
Lam•
N
C)
O
ir
w
w
w
w
w.
�,
I
C`
'4
C
cf)
t "
t Q
r.�)
C?
,-1
r i r
G'
r''
M
•
`
111`
O •
�- 1 ,
Q-1 (D
F 0 O
li r-{
U')
to
C -
CO
CAI
r - i
Cl-
Q)
CO
r-4
G))
aj
LO
0)
n?
i
r�_
O
M
C)
•rt
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
tl • .<
G
r
.Q CiS C i
r 4 O1
11�
r-i
C�
C'Z
C"
ch
4
('1
H
N
r-f
i
LO
►�:
~t
CO
.N 4,
f t O
CQ
:Li
CQ
G)
r-I
n
CO
0
Cla
<J
0
u7
r I
L') {
d
CH
vil
A
c-4
to
a 01
r-I
Ct?
r-
H
O
•A '
4 d -
P - F�
cc; `
r
O
O
d
O
C3
0
0
r^I
.
1:7
Lo
L`-
r\7
to
O
U�
G�
�Ffi •{-
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w�
w
• cif
C1 �' + }
n
%m
U
Lam-
tD
r-{
E-
�)
C)
G')
O
00
C
r
O
co
,
�N
• X1.1 + '
• {-
w
(�•3
w
( S/
w
1_S J
t:`r)
�. 2
y
t ,. J
t�
co m
`�J
l 0))
0 )
('� t
C�2
w
w
n
w»
c
w
r
w
r-•1
w
ca
wr,
C
w
e}1
r"{
L(,
O
td
z'
Oj
Q)
LAS
W
ry
0
•r!
�f
L�
rte
rU
F,
c0
tj
N
O
ct)
r'il
v
0
e
b
b
H
0
r-A
4
0
a
pq
I
f
The'Corhm.ittee explained that the last coluAm,` referring to
pro rata of cost of fide City of Los l.�.nge."Les trails-mission line, was a
rough estimate.
It was moved, seconded and unanimously carried that the
proposed allocation as presented by this corar. be approved.
2. The following resolution was unanimously adopted:
"RESOLVED, that the allocation reported (full
text attached hereto) be adopted; that is, of the
power allocated to the eleven municipalities, each
receive as follows:
City
Percentage
of Tot
Burbank.
6.12
San Bernardino
11.76
Pasadena
26.82
Glendale
16.09
Riverside
9.91
Santa Ana
6.65
Newport
. 73
Beverly Hills
10.01
Colton
5.50
An ahe im
3,.11
Fullerton
3.30
100.00
-3-
11 FURTIMi R k]SOLVE D, that generation of
Boulder Canyon power for the municipalities
be performed by the City of Los Angeles, and
that the municipalities designate the City
of Los Angeles as the agent for transmitting
any Boulder Canyon power for which they con-
tract over the main transmission lines con-
structed by the City for carrying Boulder
Canyon power, subject to the understanding
that, if ' on further investigation before
April 15, 1932, it shall prove to be material-
ly more economical for any municipality to
make a different arrangement, it may do so;
and,
"FURTHER RESOLVED, that in case of any
disagreement over the question of cost of
transmission of Boulder Canyon power, such
disagreement will be adjusted by the Secretary
of the Interior; and,
s'FUBTI'H -R RESOLV`�D, that any municipality
desiring to reserve the right to contract with
the United States for power, in accordance with
the allocation approved April 7th, shall take
formal action indicating such desire on or bib-
fore May 15 1930, and shall transmit advice of
such action to the Secretary and to a committee
consisting of the General Manager of the Light
Department of the City of Pasadena, who shall
transmit such advice to the other municipalities.
Thereafter, on or before April 15, 1931, such
municipality shall enter into a final contract
with the government. Any power allocated to a
municipality, but not reserved or contracted for
under the two foregoing time limitations, shall
be included in the allocations to those munici-
palities who do make such reservation and con-
tract, in the ratio that their present alloca-
tions bear to each other; and,
14 FURTHER RESOLVED, that these municipalities
pledge their cooperation to make the Boulder
Canyon Project a success in all its phases."
-4-
-5_
%
q ,
In attendance
were the following representatives:
H.
H.
Coffman
Supervisor
Burbank
J.
H.
McCambridge
Supt. Public Service
i
A.
H.
Lowe
City Engineer
San Bernardino
M.
W.
Edwards
Dr. Elec. Engr.
Pasadena
Paul
E. Schwab
Mayor
Beverly Hills
Arthur Taylor
Cons. Engr.
91 94
J.
W.
Price
City Manager
Anaheim
Grover
L. Walters
Supt. Water & Lighting
Fullerton
L.
E.
Miller
Mayor
.Anaheim
J.
L.
McBride
Council
Santa Ana
C.
A.
Hutchinson
City Engr.
Colton
J.
W.
Charleville
City Manager
Glendale
C.
E.
Kimlin
Mayor
Glendale
P.
Diederich
Supt. Light Water Depts.
Glendale
R.
L.
Boulden
Supt. Elec. Dept.
Riverside
Joseph S. Long
Mayor
Riverside -
B.
F.
DeLanty
Gen. Mgr. Lt. & Pr. Dept.
Pasadena
John
L. Bacon
Chrmn. Col. Riv. Comm.
San Diego
E.
F.
Scattergood
Chief Elec. Engr.
Los Angeles
VT.
C.
Mullendore
Vice - President
So.Cal.Edison Co.
W.
B.
Mathews
Attorney
Los Angeles
S.
H.
Finley
Dir. Met. Water District.
Santa Ana
-5_