RES-2026-014RESOLUTION NO. 2 0 2 6 - 014
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT
FOR A REDUCTION IN CODE -REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE
WYNDHAM HOTEL AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2024-00058)
(515 WEST KATELLA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") did receive
a verified petition for a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Administrative
Adjustment from Union Investments USA, LLC ("Applicant") to increase the number of hotel
rooms at the Wyndham Hotel from the previously -approved 78 rooms to 107 rooms, and changes
to 6,394 square feet of accessory use areas (the "Project") on certain real property located at 515
West Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally
depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the
"Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property consists of a 0.97-acre parcel currently developed with a four-
story hotel. The Property is designated for Commercial Recreation land uses in Figure LU-5 with
special density limitations as described in Table LU-4 of the General Plan. The property is also
located in the SP92-2 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) ("ARSP") zone; and,
WHEREAS, the Project includes the following land use entitlements:
An Amendment to Table LU-4 of the General Plan Land Use Element to create a
new density category, "Medium Density (Modified B)" for the ARSP.
2. Amendment No. 18 to Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP) to create a new density
category "Medium Density (Modified B)" to include in ARSP Exhibit 3.3-2 (Commercial
Recreation (C-R) Development Density Plan) and depict the new designation on the subject
property. The amendment would amend the text in ARSP Section 3.3.2 (Commercial Recreation
(C-R) District Development Density) and Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.116.060.020,
Table 116-B (Hotel/Motel Room Density) to add the "Medium Density (Modified B)" category.
3. An Administrative Adjustment to allow a 28% reduction in the number of parking
spaces required by the Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
"CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental
documents for the Project; and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study in support of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) was prepared in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines to evaluate the
physical environmental impacts of the Project. The IS/MND was circulated for a 20-day
public/responsible agency review on October 15, 2025 and again on November 7, 2025, and was
also made available for review on the City's website. A complete hard copy of the IS/MND is on
file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First
Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The complete copy of the IS/MND was also
available on the Office of Planning and Research's CEQAnet database; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring
Program has been prepared for the Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to
the Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 395"). A complete copy of MMP No. 395 is on file
and can be viewed in the Planning Services Division of the City; and
WHEREAS, the IS/MND and errata or other corrections, clarifications, and/or additions
which do not alter the conclusions of the IS/MND shall be referred to herein collectively as the
"Mitigated Negative Declaration" and together with MMP No. 395 prepared for the Project
constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA, and the CEQA
Guidelines and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic
Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on December 1, 2025, at 5:00 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and
testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the
Project, and to investigate and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing and based upon its independent review, analysis, and
consideration of the environmental information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration,
including MMP No. 395 (MMP No. 395), the Planning Commission found substantial evidence in
the record to support its actions and did adopt its Resolution No. PC2025-041 finding and
recommending that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
MMP No. 395, and determine that (i) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the
Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and all applicable CEQA Guidelines; (ii)
the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City;
(iii) the Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the Project satisfying the requirements of CEQA; and (iv) no further
environmental documentation needs to be prepared for CEQA for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself, and in its behalf, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing relating to the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC2025-043 and recommended that the City Council approve an administrative adjustment for a
28% reduction in Code required spaces, in the form presented at the meeting at which this
Resolution is adopted and incorporated herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to
-2-
the adoption by the City Council of (1) an ordinance approving Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 and the Zoning and Development Standards (Chapter 18.116 of
Title 18) to create a new density category of "Medium Density (Modified B)"; and (2) a resolution
approving a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Element for The Wyndham Hotel; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said Resolution Nos. PC2025-041 and PC2025-043, summary
of evidence and report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City
Council did fix the 240, day of February, 2026, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the
Civic Center as the place for a public hearing for the purpose of considering the Project, Mitigated
Negative Declaration and MMP No. 395, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided
by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, the City Council did hold and conduct such public
hearing, give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and receive evidence and
reports and did consider the Project, including recommendations of the Planning Commission,
potential environmental impacts addressed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No.
395; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2026-012, considered and approved by the City Council
on February 24, 2026, concurrently with but prior in time to consideration of this Resolution, and
based upon its independent review, analysis, and consideration of the environmental information
contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with the Project, the City
Council has heretofore approved and adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP No.
395, and determining that (i) the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the requirements of CEQA and all applicable CEQA Guidelines; (ii) the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and MMP No. 395 are adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental
determination for the Project; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be
prepared for CEQA for the Project; and
WHEREAS, this City Council, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing
with respect to the Project, specifically, with respect to the request for this administrative
adjustment, does hereby find and determine as follows:
1. The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code. The
Code permits a deviation of up to 50% from the Code -required parking for hotels within The Resort
through an administrative adjustment if designated loading spaces are provided for TNC vehicles.
Based on the proposed increase in the number of hotel rooms and accessory uses, 137 spaces are
required per Code while 98 spaces are provided, representing a 28% reduction in Code -required
spaces. The hotel provides for loading and unloading space in the surface stalls located directly
adjacent to the hotel entrance, and includes designated space for TNC vehicle parking and loading.
Therefore, the request for the administrative adjustment for a 28% reduction is consistent with the
purpose and intent of the Zoning Code.
2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning
Code that do not require adjustment. Due to existing improvements on the property, additional
-3-
parking cannot be achieved on -site. The hotel is an existing permitted use, and with the approval
of the Specific Plan Amendment for increased density, the hotel will be consistent with the
allowable use for the site.
3. The proposed administrative adjustment will not produce a result that is out of
character or detrimental to the neighborhood. The applicant conducted a parking survey at the
project site on Monday, March 3, 2025; Friday, March 7, 2025; and Saturday, March 8, 2025,
between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m. The maximum number of spaces used at any one time
was 79 spaces, which occurred at 10 p.m. on Saturday, March 8, 2025, which is less than the 98
spaces provided. The parking survey was conducted when the hotel was already operating with the
increase in hotel rooms and accessory uses under normal conditions. Therefore, adequate parking
is provided on -site for the existing mix of uses. Lastly, staff has not received any complaints
regarding parking from the surrounding business owners. The hotel has been operating with the
additional rooms and accessory uses for several years, and therefore, it can be assumed that
adequate parking is provided on -site and the reduction in required parking will not be detrimental
to the neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, this City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes
substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the
facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including
testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials
in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the
findings made in this Resolution. This City Council expressly declares that it considered all
evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to
it; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the findings approved and
adopted by the Planning Commission in its Resolution No. PC2025-043 on December 1, 2025, the
data and analysis set forth in the staff report and associated documents presented to it, testimony
for and against the Project and the entitlements and comments by members of the City Council,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, investigation and
study made by its and the above findings, the City Council of Anaheim hereby approve the
administrative adjustment to allow for a reduction in Code required parking for the Wyndham
Hotel, contingent upon and subject to (1) the adoption by the City Council of an ordinance
approving Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 and the Zoning and
Development Standards (Chapter 18.116 of Title 18) to create a new density category of "Medium
Density (Modified B)"; (2) the adoption by the City Council of resolutions approving a General
Plan Amendment to amend Table LU-4 to reflect the "Medium Density (Modified B)" density
category and an administrative adjustment for a 28% reduction in Code -required parking; and (3)
the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B ("Conditions of Approval") attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby find and determine
that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
-4-
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction,
then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim this 24 day of February , 2026, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius,
Rubalcava, Kurtz, Plaahs and Meeks
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
01
CITY OF ANAHEIM
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-5-
APN: 082-271 05
EXHIBIT "A"
DES' \ O.202.1-00058
W KATELLA AVE
O° 29 so Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS.
vPlease note the accuracy is +/- two to five feet.
EXHIBIT • B•
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT
(DEV2024-00058)
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
I
I lie legal omier shall subinit an application iur a Subdivision
Public \ orks Department.
Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works
Development Services
Department. The Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by
the City Surveyor and recorded in the Office of the Orange
County Recorder.
2
All private improvements encroaching onto the public right of
Public Works Department,
way shall require the applicant to enter into an Encroachment
Development Services
License Agreement with the City as approved by the Director of
Public Works.
3
All CBC and CFC requirements shall be followed for permit
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
issuance. Any fire permits which includes fire sprinklers, fire
alarm, etc., shall be submitted directly to Anaheim Fire
Prevention Department.
4
Divided rooms shall be provided with required fire alarm
Anaheim Fire & Rescue
notification devices and have the fire sprinkler system modified
in order to meet NFPA 13 coverage andspacing requirements.
5
The Property Owner shall be required to submit plans to the
Planning and Building
Planning & Building Department for the modifications that were
Department
conducted to the internal and exterior room connections, and
accessory use square footage on the first floor. These plans shall
be reviewed and approved by the Building Official and shall
meet the latest requirements of the Unified Building Code.
GENERAL
6
The Applicant/Owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold
Planning and Building
harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and
Department,
agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as
Planning Services Division
"Indemnitees") from any and all claims, actions or proceedings
brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void,
or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit
or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done,
or made prior to the decision, or to determine the
reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached
thereto. The Applicant's indemnification is intended to include,
but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys' fees and other
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in
connection with such proceeding.
7
The Applicant/Owner shall be responsible for compliance with,
Planning and Building
and any direct costs associated with the monitoring and
Department,
reporting of all mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation
Planning Services Division
Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 395 adopted for the project,
established by the City of Anaheim as required by Section
21081.6 of the Public Resources Code to ensure implementation
of those identified mitigation measures within the timeframes
identified in the measure. MMP No. 395 is made part of these
conditions of approval by reference.
8
Should the Planning and Building Director determine that on-
Planning and Building
site parking is no longer sufficient, the Applicant/Owner shall
Department,
be required to submit plans to the City demonstrating how the
Planning Services Division
issue would be resolved. This may include, but is not limited to,
introduction of valet parking and/or off -site parking.
9
The Applicant/Owner is responsible for paying all charges
Planning and Building
related to the processing of this discretionary case application
Department,
within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the
Planning Services Division
issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs
first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the
issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of
the approval of this application.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the
original Resolution No. 2026-014 adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim
City Council held on the 241h day of February, 2026 by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Kurtz, Rubalcava
Maahs and Meeks
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of February, 2026.
CITY (XtRK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)