Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05/08/1906-003
__ _ _ ~'" ~..y t i( 9 ~ _ Resolution No. Resorted by th® ~3+oard ~f Trustees of the Cite` df pnahe+ 1!'hese~s, at the P®al election' held in th~-C`~tY of ,Axsahe3~: Coixrity of Qrge, ~ta~e of California°; an: thee. 141. day of April, 17the: tats vote aset thereat i3~ pursuat~~e o Ordinance 2to. n19o6 , ~~~ ~: ~t8~ ~~`~ ~tnd ~. ~, r:,:~, ,: :w~er~~s•"Propos~,''iori ~~s`%' 1, to=~it:y j 1, ; nll the City of Anaheim incur. abond- ~ to pay the coat of , 000 . oil i tetlness of $°3, in~p ' `meat of, and the construction of ad- WorkQ and distrib~ +~ ~~ '' . diti o, the City. Water ~ item of said- City i ~ uY n ~B~ z,~'f 'y'gt~~,t ; , ~ i ~~~=: ~ ~~'~~=~ ~ ,.vt~t~ee for ite ~~ption~and g7 votes against ~ ~, received ~,~ ~- ~ ~ to-grit : its adoption; and Proposition No. <, ,- Sha11 the City of Anaheim incur abond- i ~indebtednesa of $25,000 topay the eoatof , the construction of ad- ~ and ment of ' ~ . , irnve 'one to,' the ('i.ty llectric Light Plant and. ~; ~ ' ~ ~ rihutina._system nf~ dai~i E`i~! ~ z 3 ~c _ gr 3, ;x, -. , gat e~ti~st its ad~P- ° a ~`toi~ a , ~~ _ reaeived 194 votes ~~ tion; s.nd Fropositioi~ No. 3, to-Wit . +~ ~ ', 3 Shall t11e City of ~Anaheimineur a bond- ' {~ ~ ~i~lebtedness of ~15,0(?0 to pay the cost ; ". Ge e~P.t3'n1i plant and ~ }~ lass i ~ . nf~_.~ trYxAt~'net ~_,.., ; ributin~ a3°~tem xn aair~ ~`i~3~'B ~a ~ ' w ~. ' ~, o~ against its ad- ~ ~ .~. I ~, reoe3.ved~ l~9 ~ot~~ .;.'Y. .: ~ ," option; ~nct Pro`posi~~.on, Ro. #, to-wit: Shall the City of Anaheim incur a band- i ~${. ' 4 , a eil indebtedness of $3,040 to 1?ay the cost of i ~~oustruetine `Concrete cross-walks at the in• bf street crossings in said City4 ~.~' ti , ons tersec ve 176 votes ~~tl~ a~~t i~ ~~. vot ens against its adap- Pecei d ~ lion; and. Propo'siti~ Ito. 5, to-grit e ~. . 5. ShaII the City o-f Anaheim incur a bond- 0!10 to pay the cost of f $3 s e r ` ~'~`; ~, q , o s ] indebtedn 'e oiling of the pnlSlic streets of said City2 Y ~~ g9 votes against ~' reeeiv~. 173 vot ~~ ~ ;~ ~ - , its adoption; and ~; the ~~lber of votes in favor` of ~naurring the 3rLdebt- ~~' ~~ vhereRe, s s ecified 3.n the aforesaid P~~pogitio N'wabers 1 and ~ was P i~ ednea -thirds of all the votes oast at such $pecsial election; t wo amore than f votes in favor of inourring the indebtedness 8peci- end th® number o fled in Prop©siti~-ts ~, Z and 5 >~a was less than two-thirds of all the votes oast at said speoial election; therefore be it ~;, ;{ _, . ~Y< ~