Loading...
7 (030) Susana Barrios From:Bulmaro Vicente <boomer@chispaoc.org> Sent:Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:29 AM To:Public Comment Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] Public Comment Item 7 - Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Attachments:4.21.26 Chispa Item 7 - Letter of Opposition.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi, Please find Chispa's letter of opposition for Item 7 In Solidarity, Boomer Policy and Political Director | Chispa e: boomer@chispaoc.org c: 1505 E 17th Street Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501c4 non-profit organization. 1 April 21, 2026 Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of City Council City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitkens and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Chispa, we write to express our strong opposition to Item #07, which proposes expanding the City of Anaheim’s (City) Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third-party vendors and regional data-sharing platforms introduces real and well-documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country.1 Anaheim has experienced large-scale immigration enforcement actions over the past year, where we have seen ICE abduct members of our community. We appreciate the City’s efforts to support residents through initiatives such as the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo. However, expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City’s immigrant families at greater risk. Investing in surveillance technology not only sends the wrong message to residents, particularly immigrant communities, who are already vulnerable but it is at odds with the City’s values. At a time when immigrant communities are facing heightened fear due to increased enforcement activity, this item risks deepening harm,eroding trust between residents and local government, and being used as a tool by outside agencies like ICE. We urge the City Council to reject Item #07 and instead prioritize community-based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents. Best, Bulmaro Vicente, Policy and Political Director 1 Khari Johnson and Mohamed Al Elew, “California Police Are Illegally Sharing License Plate Reader Data with ICE and Border Patrol,” CalMatters, June 13, 2025, https://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/06/california-police-sharing-license-plate-reader-data/ (accessed April 21, 2026).