90-289 RESOLUTION NO. 90R- 289
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM APPROVING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS RELATING TO SPECIFIC PLAN 90-2 FOR
DOWNTOWN ANAHEIM-EAST CENTER STREET.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.93 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a
request for approval of a specific plan for the proposed Downtown
Anaheim East Center Street Development (hereinafter Downtown
Anaheim-East Center Street Specific Plan) to provide for the
development of 390 residential dwelling units (single-family and
multiple-family) and 6,600 square feet of commercial uses (in a
mixed commercial/residential use development) and 2.61 acres of
public open space including a train station/community facility.
Also incorporated within the Specific Plan is a Public Facilities
Plan which consists of maps and text setting forth the location of
proposed utilities and facilities. Subject property consists of
23.68 acres bounded by Cypress Street to the north, Center Street
and Broadway to the south, Olive Street and Philadelphia Street to
the west and the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe railroad
right-of-way to the east (downtown Anaheim), and the legal
description is contained in City Council Resolution No. 90R-pnn
in which the City Council adopted Specific Plan No. 90-2; and -
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said application, notices of which public hearing were
duly given as required by law; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC90-160 recommending the
adoption of Specific Plan No. 90-2, including a public facilities
plan and Resolution No. PC90-161 recommending approval of the
zoning and development standards for Specific Plan 90-2; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
the City Council caused the review of said Planning Commission
action at a duly noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the
same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find, after careful
consideration of the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing
concerning the zoning and development standards, that:
1. That the property proposed for the Specific Plan has
unique site characteristics such as topography, location or
surroundings which are enhanced by special land use and development
standards.
2. That the Specific Plan is consistent with the goals
and policies of the General Plan and with the purposes, standards
and land use guidelines contained therein and as £ollows:
(a) That the Specific Plan document provides
information to establish consistency between the
Specific Plan proposal and the General Plan
policies concerning Land Use, Community Services
and Infrastructure, Redevelopment, Circulation,
Mousing, Open Space/Conservation, Safety,
Seismicity and Noise.
(b) That the proposed residential densities for Parcel
14S (18.0 du/ac for the single-family attached
condominium product) are in conformance with the
Low-Medium Density Residential land use designation
which permits up to 18 dwelling units per acre and
the proposed residential densities for Parcels 14N
(35.11 du/ac for the apartment product), 4d (44.7
du/ac for the apartment product integrated with a
commercial/retail component), and 22 (4.74 du/ac
for the single-family detached product and 8.59
du/ac for the single-family attached product) are
in conformance with the Medium Density Residential
land use designation which, given the location of
the Specific Plan project area within the
"Downtown" area of Anaheim (as defined in the
Redevelopment Element), permits densities exceeding
the maximum 36 dwelling units per acre.
(c) That the commercial/retail component on Parcel 4d
would serve as a limited extension of the General
Commercial designation of properties immediately to
the west of the site and also as a transition to
the Medium Density Residential land use designated
for Parcel 4d.
(d) That the open space designation along Center Street
is implemented by a pedestrian oriented esplanade
and the open space designations for the easterly
portion of the Specific Plan area are implemented
by a private park on the north side of Lincoln
Avenue and by a public park on the south side of
Lincoln Avenue.
3. That the Specific Plan results in development of
desirable character which will be compatible with existing and
proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; the Specific
Plan creates an approval mechanism for the City which addresses
-2-
downtown planning issues and provides the necessary standards and
guidelines to achieve a development plan with product types
compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; the specific plan
establishes development standards to govern the types of
residential and commercial uses within the Specific Plan area and
develop the downtown ar~a so it will serve as a commercial,
cultural and social focus for City residents.
4. That the Specific Plan contributes to a balance of
land uses within the City by:
(a) Providing a balanced mix of housing types with a
mix of uses which ensure active use of the downtown
area during and after work hours and on weekends.
(b) Providing a variety of community support facilities
including public open space and a train station/day
care center.
(c) Providing employment opportunities, including
retailing, financial, business services, offices
and food service facilities.
5. That the Specific Plan respects environmental and
aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities.
AND WHEREAS, the City Council does further find, after
careful consideration of the action of the City Planning Commission
and all evidence and reports offered at said public hearing before
the City Council regarding said specific plan, that all of the
conditions set forth in Section 18.95.040 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code as they apply to zoning and development standards are present;
and
WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, Final Subsequent Environmental Impact
Report No. 189, together with the accompanying addendum, including
a Mitigation Monitoring Program (collectively "FSEIR No. 189") was
prepared and submitted in connection with Specific Plan No. 90-2
for the proposed development of the property referred to as
Downtown Anaheim-East Center Street, and City Council certified
said FSEIR No. 189.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the approval of, and exercise
of any rights under, the Specific Plan Zoning and Development
Standards as herein adopted or under the Zoning and Development
Standards ordinance as hereinafter adopted shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of the first building permit, a phasing
plan for construction of the street, sewer and storm drain
improvements shall be submitted to the City Engineer for
review and approval. The plan shall include a proposed
development schedule.
-3-
2. That prior to issuance of the first building permit, street,
sewer and storm drain improvement plans shall be submitted to
the Subdivision Section for review and approval. The
improvement plans shall be in conformance with the circulation
plan and the utilities and services plan contained in the
Specific Plan.
3. That prior to final building and zoning inspection for each
development area, the street, storm drain and sewer
improvements shall be completed in accordance with the phasing
plan approved by the City Engineer.
4. That grading and drainage of subject property shall conform to
Chapter 17.04 "Grading, Excavations, Fills and Water Courses"
of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate
traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of
Anaheim in an amount as established by City Council resolution.
6. That gates shall not be installed across any (driveway in a
manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the
adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall
conform to Engineering Standard Plan No. 402 and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic
Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer for
his review and approval showing conformance with the latest
revision of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 402, 436 and 601
pertaining to parking standards. Subject property shall
thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said
plans.
8. That all driveways in the Specific Plan No. 90-2 Development
Area shall be constructed with ten (10) foot radius curb
returns as required by the City Engineer in conformance with
Engineering Standards.
9. That both parking spaces in each pair of tandem spaces shall
be assigned to the same dwelling unit.
10. That guest parking shall be clearly marked "guest parking
only" and shall be readily accessible to motorist from
contiguous streets and/or accessways.
11. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire
hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
approved by the Fire Department.
12. That all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gate
shall be equipped with "knox box" devices as required and
approved by the Fire Department.
-4-
15. That fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by the
Fire Department.
14. That an adequate, unobstructed fire truck turn-around areas,
as required and approved by the Fire Department, shall be
specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Said turn-around area shall be permanently marked and
maintained to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.
1S. That street lighting facilities along Olive Street and Cypress
Street shall be installed as required by the Utilities General
Manager in accordance with specifications on file in the
Office of the Utilities General Manager; or that security in
the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit,
or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
satisfactory completion of the above-mentioned improvements.
Said security shall be posted with the City of Anaheim prior
to issuance of a building permit. The above-required
improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy.
16. That all lots within subject project area authorized by this
resolution shall be served by underground utilities.
17. That the legal property owner/developer shall install
underground conduits and substructures and shall pay a fee to
the City of Anaheim Public Utility for removing existing
overhead 69KV, 12KV and 4KV street lighting, secondary
conductors and related facilities, and converting said
facilities to the underground system.
18. That the legal owner/developer of subject property(s) shall
provide and install underground conduits, substructures, and
related facilities, as shown on a City of Anaheim Electrical
Engineering Drawing, to accommodate the conversion of overhead
electrical lines and related facilities to underground
electrical system.
19. That the legal owner/developer of subject property(s) shall
pay a fee in accordance with the City of Anaheim Rules, Rates,
and Regulations for the removal of existing overhead power
lines, related facilities, and the installation of underground
cables, switches, pad mounted switches, transformers,
capacitors, and related facilities to complete the underground
electrical systems in the developer-provided
conduit/substructure systems.
20. That the legal owner/developer of subject property(s) shall
pay fees in accordance with the City of Anaheim Rules, Rates,
Regulations, and Electrical Engineering Construction Standards
for the installation of an in-tract electrical system to
provide service to each unit.
21. That the legal owner shall provide a fifty (S0) X seventy (70)
foot parcel for a future City groundwater well site.
22. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a
location acceptable to the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division and in accordance with approved plans on file with
said division. Such information shall be specifically shown
on the plans submitted for building permits.
25. That plans for the collection of solid waste shall be
submitted to the Maintenance Department for review and
approval.
24. That all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located
on the exterior of the building shall be fully screened by
architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials;
and, further, such information shall be specifically shown on
the plans submitted for building permits.
25. That an unsubordinated covenant shall be recorded with the
office of the Orange County Recorder agreeing to provide the
renter and/or buyer of each dwelling unit with written
information obtained from the School District(s) pertaining to
possible overcrowded conditions and busing status of the
school(s) serving the dwelling unit. A copy of the covenant
shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney prior
to recordation. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be
submitted to the Zoning Division.
26. That prior to the introduction ordinances rezoning subject
properties, a preliminary title report shall be furnished to
the Zoning Division showing the legal vesting of title, a
legal description and containing a map of the specific
property to be rezoned.
27. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City
of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with
the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 69;
provided, however, that minimum eighteen (18) foot long
driveways shall be provided in front of all "front-on" garages.
28. That a lease agreement between the legal owner/developer and
the Redevelopment Agency shall be entered into to provide
seventy-four (74) additional parking spaces within the Center
Street public parking structure, owned by the Redevelopment
Agency, in order to ensure the required number of parking
spaces in conformance with current City of Anaheim codes. A
copy of the executed and recorded Lease Agreement shall be
provided to the Zoning Division prior to the issuance of
building permits.
-6-
29. That prior to issuance of a building permit Condition Nos. 1,
2, 5, 6, 7, 14, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 28,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for
further time to complete said conditions may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
30. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition
Nos. 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 22 and 27, above-mentioned,
shall be complied with.
31. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the
proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the
Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City,
State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any
action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request
regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
52. That the legal owner/developer shall be responsible for any
direct costs associated with the monitoring and/or reporting
required as set forth by Section 21081.6 of the Public
Resources Code to ensure implementation of those mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which
have been incorporated as conditions of approval for subject
property. A copy oE the Mitigation Monitoring Program is
attached to this resolution and labeled Attachment "A".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Anaheim does hereby find and determine that the adoption of this
Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with
each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any
condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then
this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 24th day of July , 1990.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
SJM:kh
3812L
072390
-7-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N, SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 90R-289 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 24th day of July, 1990, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 90R-289 on the 25th day of July, 1990.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 25th day of July, 1990.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 90R-289, duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on July 24, 1990.
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTACHMENT A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
This mitigation monitoring program for the Lincoln Village Project has been
prepared in compliance with Assembly Bill 3180 (California Public Resources
Code Section 21081.6) which became State Law on January 1, 1989. The
program includes mitigation measures for the project that the City of Anaheim
will adopt or make conditions of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid
significant and adverse effects on the environment. The program has been
designed to ensure compliance during project implementation.
1. MONITORING CHECKLIST
Project mitigation measures, identified to mitigate or avoid significant and
adverse effects on the environment, have been incorporated into a checklist.
Each mitigation measure is listed separately on the checklist with appropriate
spaces for monitoring the progress of implementation of each mitigation measure.
This checklist is the basis for the monitoring program. Any information provided
to the City by the applicants for individual development projects must be kept
with the checklist in the project file for that project for the purpose of
verification. The checklist is included at the end of this section.
2. MONITORING PROGRAM
Mitigation monitoring for the Lincoln Village project will be managed through
the City's development review process. Many mitigation measures can be
monitored through the City's plancheck process. As City staff reviews the project
plan, the plans will be checked for compliance with each mitigation measure.
The project specific measures are divided into project design and on-going
measures. Each category and sub-category requires different monitoring
techniques, but will be monitored using the checklist.
2.1 Project Design Mitigation Measures
A project design mitigation measure is a measure that will be incorporated into
the project design (for example: provision of a retention basin or construction of
an acoustical barrier). Such measures will normally be shown on the building
and/or grading plans. These plans will be reviewed for each mitigation measure,
and each mitigation measure shown on the plans will be noted on the checklist
and signed off. If a mitigation measure is not shown, the plans will be sent for
corrections. Plans will not be approved until each mitigation measure has been
incorporated into the project design. After the plans are approved, and before
the final inspection of the project, the project proponent will submit proof that
each mitigation measure shown on the pl~n~ has been installed or incorporated
into the constructed project. Installation or incorporation of mitigation measures
will be verified with a letter of verification from the Director of Community
Development. Verification of compliance will then be noted on the monitoring
checklist and signed off, thereby completing the process for that particular
monitoring measure.
2.2 Ongoing Mitigation Measures
An ongoing mitigation measure is a measure that is associated with the project
over a period of time, such as dust control or landscape maintenance.
Monitoring of this type of measure will be similar to that described in Section
2.1, except that the status of each mitigation measure will be noted at various
times on the checklist, until monitoring is no longer needed. The project
proponent may be required to submit periodic reports to the City on the status of
this type of mitigation measure.
3. OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS
For cases in which compliance with a mitigation measure cannot be verified
through the plancheck process or the City.established inspe~on process, or
which require specialized expertise, an outside consultant m~y be hired. The
project proponent may hire outside consultants subject to the City's approval, or
the City will do so. Should the City hire consultants, the City will collect a
deposit from the project proponent for the consultant services, as described in
Section 6 of this program.
4. OTHER AGENCIES
Monitoring mitigation measures requested by other agencies will be the
responsibility of the requesting agency. The City will notify these agencies which
mitigation measures requested by these agencies have been included in project
approval. The agencies will then submit a proposed monitoring program to the
City. These agencies will inform the City in writing when monitoring is
complete.
5. MONITORING PROGRAM RECORDS
The overall program monitoring checklist will be maintained by the
Redevelopment Agency and City pl~nnlng Department The completed
mitigation monitoring checklist for each development project will be kept in the
project £de in the Planning Deparunent These records will be available for
ppUbllc insoection upon request Any information provided to the City by the
a pllcant ~r other agencies for the purpose of veritication must be kept with the
checklist in the project file.
2
6. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FEES
6.1 Processing Fee .
The City may charge a project applicant for the actual cost to the City of
monitoring all mitigation measures for a specific development project as
described in this program.
A deposit may be required by the City to be applied toward this fee. Any
unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to the project applicant.
6.2 Consultant Fee
The cost associated with services of outside consultants will be paid by the
project applicant. A deposit may be required by the City to be applied toward
the consultant services. Any unused portion of the deposit will be refunded to
the project applicant.
7. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AGREEMENT
The City may require an agreement from the project applicant specifying the
applicant's responsibility for the monitoring program, including manner of
payment, penalties for noncompliance and financial security arrangements. The
project applicant's responsibilities for monitoring and reporting on the status of
implementation of specific mitigation n, easures will also be included in this
agreement, as will any other relevant issues identified by the City.
8. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
In the event of a disagreement between the City and a project applicant
regarding the monitoring program, including manner of payment, penalties for
noncompliance and f'mancial security arrangements, the following procedure will
be followed:
8.1 The Environmental Coordinator for the City shall attempt to
resolve the disagreement. If the disagreement cannot be resolved,
the Environmental Coordinator shall prepare a report documenting
the source of the dispute and the City's position.
8.2 The Environmental Coordinator will take the report before the
Planning Commission, which will determine the resolution of the
disagreement.
8.3 The Project Applicant shall be allowed to apl~eal the decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council~ The decision of the
City Council shall be final.
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PLAN
CEQA Action: Notice of Determination of Adequacy of Previously Certified
Environmental Impact Report # 189 for Project Alpha Redevelopment Plan~
Project Description: The proposed development for the Specitic Plan Area
encompasses the eastern end of the new Center Street "Esplanade", terminating
at Atchison Street. Future development plans by the Redevelopment Agency will
extend the Center Street improvements to the west to connect to the Civic
Center facilities and a proposed commercial center west off Anaheim Boulevard.
The land uses envisioned in the Plan provide for retail services to be developed
at the ground level of Center Street west of Olive. The principal land use,
however, will be residential, providing a wide range of new housing types
including: detached and attached (paired) single family units, townhouses, and
multiple-family apartments. To buffer the residential neighborhoods from the
ATSF Railroad fight.of-way, a new public park is proposed that will help meet
the recreational needs of the new residents of Downtown. Proposed land uses by
parcel are shown on the table below, and their location is indicated on Figure 1.
Owner/Applicant: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
300 S. Harbor Blvd., Suite 900
Anaheim, CA 92805
Agent: Lincoln Property Development Company N.C., Inc.
17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 1400
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Project Location: Generally bounded by Cypress Street, the ATSF right-of-way,
Atchison Street, Center Street, and Olive Street (refer to
attached map of project area).
City Action: Approval of Disposition and Development Agreement;
Resolution Number:
O) The mitigation measures for this program are from the following reports and
memos: "Subsequent Environmental Impact Report", November 1976;
"Downtown Anaheim East Center Street Development Draft Specific Plan", April
1990; "Preliminary Noise Assessment and Noise Control Recommendations,
Parcels 22, 14N and 4D, City of Anaheim", April 19, 1990; Memos from Wilbur
Smith Associates dated April 6, 1990, February 6, 1990 and August 4, 1990
regarding traffic in the project area; and "Sewer System Analysis for Lincoln
Properties Development in the City of Anaheim", April 1990. Where additional
measures have been included over and above those provided in the preceding
reports, these measures are indicated by an *
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
SPECIFIC PI.~
PROPOSED LAND USE BY PARCEL
LINCOLN VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN
Number of Dwellin~
Land Use Units/Squar~ Feet Parcel #
Condominium 28 du 14S
Multiple-Family 184 du 14N
101 du 4D
Paired Units 46 du 22
Single-Family 31 du 22
Retail 6,600 sq. ft. 4D
Total Dwelling Units: 390
Source: Downtown Anaheim East Center Street Development Draft Specific
Plan, April 1990.
6
m~'~'~, Project
SOURCE: Sadway Cooke A$~ooiate$ 4190
North .~ ~oa ~o~ ,oa Uncoln Village
.Figure 1
Project Area
..~ J'~ ~. -- -- ~t~ _:{ Reserved
~' --,~-- -- -- I -I For UsaDie
U : I'~] Open Space
enter Street
~,~' ~ t ? ~ XTS~ ~OW
.....
Designation (D.U. / Net Acre) Ty~oe -
~ow-,~m ~Jl~[]][.. ~o a~,. F.,~/~=:hed 0.~. s~c, ~ ~ ~,~
Re~denti~ ~ ;.,.::~8 - 10~ F~ A~ Pai~ ~ ~ Es~a~de
M~ium Density 16 - ~ ~ F~ ~ T~ Ho~
Res~dena~
~ ~y ~e ~ 4~
~ North. ~.. ~e~ [o~ ._ ,o~ ~o~ V~ge
Figure 2
Proposed Land Use
8
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
Land Use Prior to issuance of All relocation activity shall Redevelopment Agency
building permits be conducted in compliance
with California Rolocation
Assistance Law (Government
Code Section 7260 et seq.),
the State Guidelines thereto,
and the Relocation Rules and
Regulations adopted by the
Agency.
Air Quality Prior to issuance of Increase the number and Planning
building permits and tyFes of full grown plant
certificate of occupancy species to be introduced in
to ensure installation the area.
During construction Compliance with SCAQMD Planning, SCAQMD
Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust
Emissions)*
During construction Incorporate energy Planning
conservation mcasure~ which
meet or exceed
requirements of Title 24.*
9
¢
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area TiBiaS Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise Prior tO issuance of The exterior noise 1c¥cl on Planning
building permits and the project site shall not
certificate of occupancy exceed a community noise
to ensure installation equivalent level (CNEL) of
65 dS. This will bc
accomplished with the
following measures:
For Parcel 22, a harrier 13
ft. in height will be
constructed along the
northern, eastern, and
southern property lines in
the ~icinity of the railroad as
indicated in Figure 3.
Barriers, 5 ft. to 7 ft. high
shall also be built which
enclose the rear and side
yards of lots with line of
sight to Lincoln Avenue, as
shown in Figure 3.
10
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
AlTa Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise -The bar[lets shall bc
(continued) continuous st[uctu[es
without gaps or gates, and
will be constructed of a
material that is impervious to
noise (e.g.concrctc block.
concrete panels, stucco-on-
wood, earthen betre, 1/4-
inch tempered plate glass, or
any combination of these
materials).
11
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise -Balconies in Parcels 14N
(continued) and 4D which have line-of-
sight to either Lincoln
Avenue or the railroad will
need perimeter walls :5 ft. to
5.5 ft. high. Refer to
Figures 4 and 5 for the
location and heights of the
balcony walls. These walls
will also be continuous
structures, without gaps or
gates and shall be
constructed of a material that
is in, pervious to noise (e.g.
stucco-on-wood, 1/4-inch
plate glass, or any
combination of these
materials). Refer to Figure 6
for a typical construction
detail of the balcony walls.
12
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Nols~ -The precise height of the
(continued) precise height of Ihc sound
barriers will be determined
as part of the final
engineering design.
Prior to issuance of The following measures will Planning
building permit and be implemented to ensure
certificate of occupancy that the 45 dB CNEL
to ensure installation interior standard is met:
-All windows and sliding
glass in the project will be
av. il fitted, well
weatherstripped and sound
rated assemblies. Sound
transmission class (STC)
ratings as high as 32 may be
needed at buildings adjacent
to the proposed sound
barriers. The actual ratings
needed will be determined as
part of the final engineering
design of the project.
13
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
lapact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Nnl~e -Sound transmission class
(continued) (STC) is per American
Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM)
Designations E-90 or E-366
and Eo413.
-Bathrooms are not
considered to be habitable
spaces had, therefore, do not
require sound rated windows.
This applies only to
bathrooms which have a
tif, Lt fitting door between
adjacent living spaces.
-Windows are required to be
kept closed in order to meet
the interior standard;
therefore, mechanical
ventilation and cooling will
be provided to maintain a
habitable environment. The
system will supply two air
changes per hour to each
habitable room including
20~ (one-fifth) fresh
14
MITIGATION MONITORING CllECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Ar~n Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Noise make-up air obtained
(continued) directly from the outdoors.
The fresh air inlet duct
should bc of sound
attenuating construction, and
will consist of a minimum of
ten feet of straight or curved
duct. or six feet plus one
sharp 90 degree hand.
NOTE: Wall mounted air
conditioners will not be
placed on an elevation facing
Lincoln Avenue or the
ra~!:oad for those units in
the vicinity of the noise
$OUFCgS.
-All exterior walls will
include one layer of R-11
insulation between the studs
and one thickness of 1/2-
inch or 5/8-inch gypsum
wallboard on the interior
side of the wall. The
exterior surface will be
constructed with ?/8-inch
stucco or siding~on-
sheafhing.
15
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monllor Date Completed
Noise -There will be no direct
(continued) openings (such as mail slots
or vents) in exterior walls or
doors with direct line-of-
sight to the railroad or
Lincoln Avenue.
-Entry doors will be well
weatherstripped, solid core.
1-3/4-inch thick assemblies.
-The roof system of the
proposed buildings will
consist of at least one layer
1/'2-inch plywood to form a
well sealed assembly.
Insulation as required by the
State Enelrgy Insolation
Standards will be placed in
the attic. if such a space is
provided.
Large (12-inch by 14-inch)
attic vents will not be placed
on elevations facing either
the railroad or Lincoln
Avenue. [f this is not pos-
sible, then an attic
16
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitnr Date Completed
Noise muffler will be used, as
(continued) indicated in Figure 7.
Light and Glare Prior to issuance of Light sourccs from retail Planning
certificate of occupancy uses will bc shicldcd from
rcsidcntial uses.
Cultural Reseurces Prior to issuance of The existing historic train Planning
building permits depot will be relocated by
the applicant to a location
within the public open space
adjacent the ATSF right-of-
way.
Prior to issuance of in order to blend with Planning
building permits adjacent historic
neighborhoods, the
architecture of the project
will draw on the "craftsman"
style as described in the
"Downtown Anaheim East
Center Street Development
Draft Specific Plan".
17
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Socloeeou®mic Prior t9 issuance of The agency will make all Redevelopment Agency
building permits reasonable efforts in scc that
all persons or businesses
displaced as a result of
development are relocated Io
suitable locations either
within or outside the project
area, and that businesses
compatible with the
provisions of the
Redevelopment Plan are
relocated within the
revitalized and redevelopcd
Prior to issuance of In order to minimize the Planning
building permits possible adverse impacts
from acquisition, demolition
shall be timed so as to
minimize the time a
structure will remain
unoccupied. In order to
effectively accomplish
appropriate scheduling, the
shortening of time as much
as possible between
reincation of the occupant
and the demolition of the
18
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Soelee¢omomle building will be encouraged.
(continued) An alternative mitigation
measure would p[ovide
adequate boa[ding up and
installation of security
fencing around unoccupied
buildings.
Prior to issuance of The rclocation of existing Redevelopment Agency
building permits businesses to locations within
the redeveloped area or
within reasonable dislance o[
the downtown area to
m~imize loss of employment
will be encouraged.
Prior to issuance of Of the approximately 700 Planning/
building permits units proposed to be built or Redevelopment Agency
acquired within the
downtown area,
approximately 300 senior
citizens and 300 family units
are to be provided within the
Residential area designated
south of the realigned
Lincoln Avenue and west of
the railroad tracks. The
remalninS 100 units will
19
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Aren Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
Socloeconomlc occur predominately in the
(continued) area designated Residential
south of Lincoln Avenue and
west of East Street. in the
event in-kind housing cannot
be provided within the
downtown area, the Agency
will construct housing
elsewhere in the City.
Police Protection Prior to issuance of Commercial facilities will Police Department
building permits and provide their own security
prior to issuance of gr~rd surveillance systems
certificate of occupancy and residential areas will be
to ensure installation easily accessible.
Fire Protection Prior to issuance of Construction materials and Fire Department
building permits and fire protection devices will
prior to issuance of be selected to minimize the
certificate of occupancy possibility of any type of
to ensure installation fire or fire hazard.
Additional fire protection
services will be
accommodated at the main
fire station on Broadway, if
necessary.
2O
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
!mimct Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Coraltiered
Schools Before i.~uancc of The Anaheim City School Redevelopment
Certificate of District will receive a pass- Agency/School District
Occupancy through from the Project
Alpha Redevelopment Area
to be used for expansion of
an existing school or for
purchase of a new school
site.
Water Prior to issuance of Landscaped areas will be Planning
building permits and watered during early morn-
prior to issuance of ing hours or during the
certificate of occupancy evening. If included as part
of ~he project, water
amenities will recycle water
within the ~ acer supply
system for these amenities.
To reduce_ the impact on the
fresh water supply, the use
of reclaimed water for
irrigation is encouraged.
Prior to issuance of Construction of additional Public Works
certificate of occupancy storm drain facilities serv-
ing the project area will be
completed as described in
the City's Master Plan for
Drainage.
21
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
Water Prior to issuance of The following water conset- Planning
(continued) building permits and vation measures will be
prior to issuance of implemented as required by
certificate of occupancy State law: installation of
to ensure installation low-flush toilets, showers
and faucets; insulation of hot
water lines in water recircu-
lating systems; and the pro-
ject will comply with the
watcf conservation provision
of the appropriate Plumbing
Code.
Sewage Prior to issuance of Im~.lementation of water Public Works
building permits and conservation measures, and
prior to issuance of flow reduction techniques
certificate of occupancy will be incorporated into
to ensure installation project d0sign.*
Solid Waste Prior to issuance of Adequate storage bins and Planning Not applicable. Project
building permits and trash compactors for solid will conform with City
prior to issuance of waste shall be installed on- ordinance regarding
certificate of occupancy site. solid waste reduction.
to ensure installation
22
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Ar~u Timing Measure to Monitor Date Completed
:Solid Waste Ptlor to issuance of Individual tenants ot Ihc Planning Not applicable - the
(continued) building permits and office buildings will bc project will not include
ongoing during encouraged to introduce office buildings.
operation techniques to reduce and to
recycle waste materials (i.e.
paper); and businesses will
use trash compactors to
reduce volume and thereby
trips to a disposal site.
Natnral Gas Prior to issuance of Incorporate energy Public Works
building permits conservation techniques into
project design to reduce
natural gas consumption.
23
MITIGATION MONITORING CIIECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible Agency
Area Timing Measure to Monitor Dote Completed
Aesthetics Prior to issuance of Specific development plans Redevelopment Agency
building permits for the proposed p~ojcct
shall be submitted to the
Redevelopment Agency for
determination of consistency
with Redevelopment Project
Alpha. Open space will he
provided in amounts
consistent with the Open
Space Element of the
General Plan. and will be
landscaped. Architectural
and landscaping plans will be
rcvi.~wcd and approved by
the Agency prior to
construction.
Prior to issuance of If the Church of the Holy Planning Photographic Survey
building permits Presence is to be demolished, completed in 1985.
photographic records of the
exterior and interior of the
building will be developed.
preserved, and included in a
public record.
24
( (
MITIGATION 54ONITORING CHECKLIST FOR LINCOLN VILLAGE
Impact Responsible AKeucy
Area TlmiBg Meanure ~o Moultor Dire Cnmpleled
Traffic Prior to issuance of Maintain the right-angle Public Works
occupancy permits turn at Atchison Street and
Ccnter Street to minimize
vehicular conflict and
impedance of traffic flow.
Prior to issuance of Provide two entrance/exit Planning/Public Works
certificate of occupancy points on Olive Street for the
proposed apartment building
on Parcel 4D.
Prior to issuance of The plan shall show that Planning
building permit parking spaces will be
pr.~vided as follows:
Parcel 14N - 2.125 spaces
per dwelling unit
Parcel 14S - 2.42 spaces per
dwelling unit
Parcel 4D - 2.125 spaces per
dwelling unit/5.5 spaces per
1,000 square feet retail space
Parcel 22 = 5.71 spaces per
dwelling unit (single-
family)/5.37 spaces per
25
SOURCE: J.J. V~m I-Iou~n & Associates, Inc. 4/19/90- ~
?~ North Li~co~ Village
Figure 3
Location and Heights of Proposed
Sound Barrier WalLs for Parcel 22
[~ First FIO~' - 5~5'. $___~o~1_ Floor - 5'
E~] Firs! Flora - 5', Second Floor - 5'
SOURCE: J.J. Van Houlen & AssOciates, Ino. 4/*19/90 . ~
~ North Lincoln Village
Figure 4
Location and Heights of Proposed First and
Second Floor Balcony Walls for Parcel 14N
I
SO.F_: J,,J. Van ~ & Associates. In~. 4/19/90
?~ North. L~o~n Village
Figure 5
Location of Proposed First and Second
Floor 5' Balcony Wall for Parcel 4D
--<---- 1/4" STATIONARY GLASS
~..,-
2" X 4" STUD
STUCCO WALL
t
BALCONY FLOOR
Van ~ & ^,,~ocietes, Inc. 4119/90
I. In¢oln ViSage
Figure 6
Cross Section of the Prol~osed Balcony
Sound Barrier Walls for Parcels 14N and 4 D
SOURCE: J~J. Van. Horton & A~o¢lates, Inc. 4/19/90
I.~ooln VEage
Figure 7
Attic Vent InstaXation with
Acoustic Baffle for Noise Control