Resolution-PC2026-021RESOLUTION NO. PC2026-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 2017-05927 TO ALLOW PUBLIC ACCESS TO
THE HOTEL ROOFTOP RESTAURANT/BAR AND
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT TO PERMIT FEWER PARKING
SPACES THAN REQUIRED BY THE CODE AND MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2026-00029)
(1601 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to amend to Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 to allow public
access to The Viv Hotel rooftop restaurant/bar and an administrative adjustment to permit fewer
parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") (collectively, the
"Proposed Project") on certain real property located at 1601 South Anaheim Boulevard in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 3.18 acres in area and is developed with an
existing 12-story, 326-room hotel and a four -level, 347-space parking structure. The Property is
designated for General Commercial land uses in the General Plan and is located in the "C-G" General
Commercial Zone and the Regional Commercial District of the South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor
(" SABC") Overlay Zone, subject to the development standards and regulations set forth in Chapter
18.08 (Commercial Zones) and Chapter 18.24 (South Anaheim Boulevard Corridor Overlay Zone)
of the Code; however, pursuant to Chapter 18.24, the provisions of the SABC Overlay Zone do not
apply to parcels developed entirely under the "C-G" Zone, as is the case with the existing
development; and
WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2018-
026, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 (DEV2017-00035) to allow the development
of a 12-story, 326-room hotel and four -level, 347-space parking structure at a greater floor area ratio
and building height than permitted by the Code, and Variance No. 2018-05106 for fewer trees along
the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5); and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the environmental
impacts of the project (DEV2017-00035) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Planning Commission adopted Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 352 by Resolution No. PC2018-025; and
WHEREAS, the hotel was subsequently developed and currently operates as The Viv Hotel
and includes a restaurant/bar located on the rooftop of the hotel. Conditions of approval imposed in
connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 limit access to the rooftop restaurant/bar to
registered hotel guests; and
WHEREAS, the original approval was subject to mitigation measures incorporated into
Resolution No. PC2018-026 as conditions of approval pursuant to the applicable environmental
review. The mitigation measures were applicable to grading and construction activities associated
with the original project and have been fully implemented and satisfied. The mitigation measures did
not impose continuing operational requirements and are not applicable to the modifications approved
by this resolution. Accordingly, the mitigation measures are not included as conditions of approval
of this amendment.
WHEREAS, amendments to the conditions of approval imposed in connection with
Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 adopted by Resolution No. PC2018-026, are considered a
major amendment to the conditional use permit, subject to approval by the Planning Commission
pursuant to Subsection .030 of Section 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval). The Proposed
Project does not include an amendment to Variance No. 2018-05106; and
WHEREAS, Section 18.60.080 (Planning Director Reviews) of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures)
of the Code provides that, when an application is made in conjunction with, and as part of, a project
that requires Planning Commission action, the application shall be made to the Planning Commission
in accordance with Chapter 18.60, and because the Proposed Project includes a major amendment to
the conditional use permit that requires Planning Commission action, the administrative adjustment
for parking is being processed concurrently before the Planning Commission as the granting
authority; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
"CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental
documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on September 21, 2026 at 5:00 p.m., with notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures)
of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate
and make findings and recommendation in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the effects of the Proposed Project are
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301 — Existing Facilities. The Class 1 Exemption consists of the
operation, repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or
facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use, where no physical changes
occur which are not otherwise exempt. The Proposed Project is a request to amend a conditional use
permit for an existing hotel to allow public access to the rooftop restaurant/bar and to permit fewer
parking spaces than required by the Code. The amendment would not result in physical expansion of
the existing hotel or rooftop restaurant/bar and would formalize an existing operational condition in
which the rooftop restaurant/bar is serving members of the public. The proposed modifications would
remain consistent with the historic level of operations on the subject property and would therefore be
- 2 - PC2026-021
consistent with this type of exemption. Pursuant to Sections 15301 and 15300.2 of the CEQA
Guidelines, no exceptions to the exemption apply, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to
the Proposed Project that would cause a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the
Proposed Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit amendment, does find and determine
the following facts:
1. The proposed amendment to the conditions of approval for an existing hotel is
properly one that will serve a use for which a conditional use permit is authorized within the General
Commercial Zone under Subsection .040 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial
Zones) of the Code.
2. The proposed amendments will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located, as they will formalize the
existing operations of an established hotel by allowing public access to the existing rooftop
restaurant/bar. The amendment to the conditional use permit will not expand the existing building
footprint, increase restaurant seating capacity, or otherwise alter the physical development of the site.
The hotel has historically operated in conjunction with the surrounding land uses, and the proposed
modification will allow the existing hotel and restaurant/bar to continue operating in a manner that
will not adversely affect adjoining properties or the continued growth and development of the
surrounding area.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner that will not be detrimental to the surrounding area or
public health and safety, as the hotel and rooftop restaurant/bar already exist. The proposed
amendment will not expand the existing building footprint or restaurant/bar seating capacity; rather,
it will formalize the existing public access to the restaurant/bar. The hotel will continue to provide
on -site security and maintain measures to ensure the safety of hotel guests and restaurant customers,
and the Proposed Project is conditioned restrict access to the rooftop pool area and guestroom levels
to registered hotel guests through a key card access system or other controlled -access system deemed
appropriate.
Additionally, a parking study was prepared to evaluate whether the existing parking supply is
adequate to accommodate the peak parking demand associated with the hotel and rooftop
restaurant/bar. The parking surveys were conducted while the hotel and rooftop restaurant/bar were
reasonably occupied and were representative of peak conditions. The analysis identified an observed
peak parking demand of 276 occupied parking spaces with 347 parking spaces provided,
demonstrating that the existing parking supply is adequate to accommodate the demand associated
with the proposed amendment.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry traffic in the area. The hotel and restaurant/bar
are existing uses, and although the conditions of approval limit access to the restaurant/bar to hotel
- 3 - PC2026-021
guests, the restaurant/bar has been in operation and serving members of the public. The proposed
amendment will permit this existing practice and will not introduce a new use, expand the
restaurant/bar or seating capacity, or substantially intensify operations on the site. The surrounding
street and highway network currently accommodates the existing traffic associated with the hotel and
restaurant/bar; therefore, approval of the amendment is not expected to substantially increase traffic
volumes in the area.
5. The granting of the amendment to the conditional use permit under the conditions
imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because
the request will remove the operational limitations of an existing hotel to allow members of the public
to access the existing rooftop restaurant/bar. The amendment will not introduce a new use or
potentially harmful activity at the site; rather, it will allow the existing rooftop restaurant/bar to
continue operating as an amenity serving hotel guests and members of the public. The restaurant/bar
will continue operating within the existing facility and remain subject to the applicable conditions of
approval and City requirements intended to protect public health and safety; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing
with respect to the request for administrative adjustment, does find and determine the following facts:
SECTION 18.62.040.020.0202.01 Minimum Number of Parking Spaces
(394 spaces required; 347 spaces proposed)
1. The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code because
the reduced parking requirement will continue to provide adequate parking to accommodate the
parking demand generated by the site. Although allowing the restaurant/bar to serve members of the
public will require additional Code -required parking, the parking study demonstrates that the parking
demand generated by the existing hotel and rooftop restaurant/bar operations will remain below the
number of parking spaces available on -site. The site will provide 347 parking spaces, resulting in a
Code -required parking deficiency of 47 spaces, or a 12% reduction, which is below the allowed 20%
parking requirement deviation. While the requested adjustment will allow a reduction from the Code -
required parking, an adequate parking supply to serve the existing hotel and rooftop restaurant/bar
operations will be maintained;
2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code
that do not require the adjustment. The site is fully developed with an existing hotel, restaurant/bar,
parking structure, and associated improvements with no available area for expansion. Complying
with the applicable parking requirement will require adding 47 parking spaces. Given the existing
development and site configuration, accommodating the additional required parking will require
substantial site modifications or removal of existing improvements. Therefore, there are no other
provisions of the Code that will achieve the same or similar result without the requested adjustment;
3. The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the
neighborhood because the existing operations will be consistent with the existing day-to-day
operations of the restaurant/bar and the visitor -serving nature of a hotel property. The property is
fully developed with an existing hotel and rooftop restaurant/bar that already serves hotel guests and
- 4 - PC2026-021
visitors in the area. Formalizing the restaurant/bar to serve the public will not alter the site's physical
character or change how the restaurant operates. Restaurant customers, whether hotel guests or
members of the public, will use the same existing facilities and amenities and will be subject to the
restaurant's existing seating capacity and operational limitations. The adjustment will not increase
the restaurant's overall capacity or introduce an activity that is incompatible with the existing property
or surrounding neighborhood. Lastly, Condition of Approval No. 19 will ensure the owner and
operator will monitor on -site parking and establish a Parking Management Plan if future problems
arise.
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes
substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the
facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony
received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report, and all materials in the project
files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that negate the findings made in this
Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented
and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, this Planning
Commission does hereby approve the conditional use permit amendment and administrative
adjustment contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property for which the conditional use permit is applicable in
order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with
Section 18.60.170 (Extension of Time to Comply With Conditions of Approval) of the Code. Timing
for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning and Building Director
upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original
intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the
applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved
development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution
as Exhibit B amend and hereby replace in their entirety the previous conditions of approval adopted
by Resolution No. PC2018-026, for Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 for the hotel and
therefore shall control and govern the Property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification, or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Sections 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval)
and 18.60.200 (Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with
each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof,
be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction,
then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
- 5 - PC2026-021
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that approval of this application constitutes approval of the
proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State
and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or
approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
September 21, 2026. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
ATTEST:
Vl 111L t.11 1 l/1 1-1-L-4 1L:11V1
L-it I-, �
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2026-021
EXHIBIT `A`
g£V NO. 20 6- n0 9
AFN: -
082 220 16 � \
«220-17
y22$l6 ! .
� . !
\
§
*2
�
«�
�
PC20 6 0 I
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT
(DEV2026-00029)
Resolution No. PC2018-026
Conditions of approval from Conditional Use Permit No. 2017-05927 that remain applicable to
the Project are carried forward and identified by reference as [Condition of Approval No. #,
Resolution No. PC2018-026].
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF EACH GRADING PERMIT
The legal property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to
Public Works,
the City of Anaheim an additional 7-ft. easement from the
Development Services
1
existing right-of-way along Anaheim Blvd for road, public
Division
utilities, and other public purposes. [Condition of Approval No.
4, Resolution No. PC2018-026].
The legal property owner shall abandon the remnant parcel
Public Works,
described as portion of segment 7 of highway right of way in the
Development Services
2
City of Anaheim per Grant Deed No. 2011000129726 and Quit
Division
Claim No. 2016000018417. [Condition of Approval No. 5,
Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
The OWNER shall obtain the required coverage under
Public Works,
California's General Permit for Stormwater Discharges
Development Services
associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the
Division
3
Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources
Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the
issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number.
[Condition of Approval No. 11, Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
The owner shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Public Works,
(SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be
Development Services
4
available for Public Works Development Services Division
Division
review upon request. [Condition of Approval No. 12,
Resolution No. PC2018-026].
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF EACH BUILDING PERMIT
Landscape plans shall indicate non -deciduous clinging vines,
Planning and Building
5
planted on three-foot centers, on the freeway -facing side of the
Department, Planning
soundwall. [Condition of Approval No. 22, Resolution No.
Services Division
PC2018-026].
Applicant shall submit for final approval a Solid Waste
Public Works,
6
Management Plan (SWMP). [Condition of Approval No. 29,
Sanitation Operations
Resolution No. PC2018-026].
PC2026-021
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside
Public Utilities,
of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all
Water Engineering
public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently
installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current
standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be
7
installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division
outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from
all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering
and Cross Connection Control Inspector. [Condition of
Approval No. 31, Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire
Public Utilities,
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments
Water Engineering
of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines,
8
shall be coordinated and permitted through the Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. [Condition of Approval No. 32, Resolution No.
PC2018-026].
All existing water services and fire services shall conform to
Public Utilities,
current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water
Water Engineering
service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall
9
be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the
existing service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall
be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water
service or fire line. [Condition of Approval No. 33, Resolution
No. PC2018-0261.
The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of
Public Utilities,
Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above -ground
Water Engineering
water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide
easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a
twenty (20)- foot -wide easement for all water service mains and
service laterals, all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering
Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water
Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department's
10
standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include
language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring
any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving,
including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers,
stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls, or landscaping
that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair, or
replacement of City -owned water facilities. Provisions for the
repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface
improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the
PC2026-021
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the
Master CC & Rs for the project. [Condition of Approval No.
34, Resolution No. PC2018-026].
The developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities
Public Utilities,
Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the
Water Engineering
maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water
demands for the project. This information will be used to
11
determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide
the estimated water demands. Any off -site water system
improvements required to serve the project shall be done in
accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates,
Rules, and Regulations. [Condition of Approval No. 35,
Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
Unless otherwise approved by Water Engineering, the following
Public Utilities,
minimum clearances shall be provided around all existing and
Water Engineering
proposed water facilities (including service laterals, hydrants,
meters, backflow devices, etc.):
• 10 feet minimum separation from structures, footings,
12
walls, stormwater BMPs, electrical transformers, power
poles, street lights, and trees.
5 feet minimum separation from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb
returns, and all other utilities (e.g., storm drain pipes and
manholes, gas, electric duct banks and vaults, sewer laterals and
manholes, etc.). [Condition of Approval No. 36, Resolution
No. PC2018-026].
No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed
Public Utilities,
13
in private alleys or paseo areas. [Condition of Approval No. 37,
Water Engineering
Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
No public water mains or laterals allowed under driveways,
Public Utilities,
14
parking stalls, or parking lots. [Condition of Approval No. 38,
Water Engineering
Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
ON -GOING DURING PROJECT OPERATIONS
Key card access is required between the parking structure and
Police Department
15
the hotel's ground floor recreation area and amenities to require
non -guests to pass through the hotel lobby. [Condition of
Approval No. 39, Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
The rooftop pool area, as depicted on the project plans, shall be
Planning and Building
for the exclusive use of registered hotel guests. Access to the
Department, Planning
16
rooftop pool area and guestroom levels shall be restricted to
Services Division
registered hotel guests through a key card access system or other
controlled -access system deemed appropriate by the Planning
PC2026-021
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
and Building Director. [Modified Condition of Approval No.
45, Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
Any tree planted within the setbacks shall be replaced in a timely
Planning and Building
17
manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or
Department, Planning
dead. [Condition of Approval No. 46, Resolution No. PC2018-
Services Division
026].
Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any
Planning and Building
18
adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed
Department, Code
or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. [Condition of
Enforcement Division
Approval No. 47, Resolution No. PC2018-0261.
The Property Owner and Operator shall monitor on -site parking
Planning and Building
conditions to ensure that all parking demand generated by the
Department, Planning
approved uses is accommodated on -site. If the City determines,
Services Division
based on complaints, field observations, code enforcement
activity, or other substantial evidence, that parking demand
regularly exceeds the available on -site parking supply, that
vehicles associated with the approved uses are parking on public
streets or adjacent private property, or that on -site circulation is
19
adversely affected, the Property Owner shall submit a Parking
Management Plan within 30 days of written notice from the
Planning and Building Director. The Parking Management Plan
shall identify corrective measures, which may include
appointment scheduling controls, tenant operational changes,
employee parking management, valet or attendant parking, lease
restrictions, or other measures acceptable to the Planning and
Building Director. The approved Parking Management Plan
shall be implemented within the timeframe specified by the City.
GENERAL
The subject Property shall be developed substantially in
Planning and Building
accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City
Department,
20
of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with
Planning Services
the Planning and Building Department, and as conditioned
Division
herein. [Condition of Approval No. 48, Resolution No.
PC2018-0261.
The business shall be operated in accordance with the Project
Planning and Building
Request and Justification Letter submitted as part of this
Department,
application. Any changes to the business operation as described
Planning Services Division
21
in these documents shall be subject to review and approval by
the Planning and Building Director to determine substantial
conformance with these documents, to determine that adequate
parking shall continue to be provided for onsite uses, and to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses.
PC2026-021
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
Landscaping shall be replaced by the applicant in a timely
Planning and Building
manner if it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. All
Department,
22
new landscaping shall be installed by the owner/developer in
Planning Services Division
conformance with Chapter 18.46 "Landscape and Screening" of
the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in
perpetuity.
The Applicant/Owner shall defend, indemnify, and hold
Planning and Building
harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and
Department,
agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as
Planning Services Division
"Indemnitees") from any and all claims, actions or proceedings
brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void,
or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit
or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or
23
made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness,
legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The
Applicant's indemnification is intended to include, but not be
limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or
incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation,
including without limitation attorneys' fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection
with such proceeding.
The Applicant/Owner is responsible for paying all charges
Planning and Building
related to the processing of this discretionary case application
Department,
within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the
Planning Services Division
24
issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs
first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the
issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of
the approval of this application.
PC2026-021
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, Madeleine Pineda-Campos, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on September 21, 2026, by the following
vote of the members thereof:
AYES: Chairperson Castro and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Kelly, and Tran-Martin
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT: Vice Chairperson Walker and Commissioners Lieberman and Perez
2026.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21s' day of September
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
PC2026-021