1967-3221 c7; 322
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TLE
CITY OF ANAHLI DENYING VARIANCB NO. 1861.
WLEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City
of Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
LOTUS H. LOUDON and VICTORIA I. LOUDON, and ALVIN R. BAKER and
EVA M. BAKER, owners of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de-
scribed as follows:
The Westerly one-half of Original Building Lot No. 3
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, as :oer map recorded in Book 4, at page 629
and 630 of Deeds of Records of Los Angeles County.
That portion of Original Building Lot 4 of Anaheim, as
per map recorded in Book 4, Pages 629 and 630 of Deeds,
in the office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles
County, California described as follows: Beginning at
a point in the Westerly line of said Lot 4, distant 28-1/2
feet North of the Southwest corner of said lot; thence
Northerly along said. Westerly line, 50 feet, thence
Easterly, parallel with Sycamore Street, 3-1/2 rods to
the Easterly line of said lot; thence Southerly along
said Easterly line, 50 feet to a point 28-1/2 feet
Northerly of the Southeasterly corner of said lot; thence
Westerly 8-1/2 rods to the point of beginning.
The part of Original Building Lot 4, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as shown
on a Map of Anaheim, recorded in Book 4, pages 629 and
630 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California,
described as follows; Eeginning at the Southwesterly
corner of said lot; thence Northerly along the Westerly
line of said Lot 23-1/2 feet; thence Easterly and
parallel with Sycamore Street, 8-1/2 rods to the Easterly
line of said lot; thence Southerly along said Easterly
line 28-1/2 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said lot;
thence Westerly along the Southerly line of said lot
and parallel with said Sycamore Street 8-1/2 rods to the
point of beginning.
Also the part of Original Building Lot 8, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as shown
on a Nap of Anaheim, recorded in Book 4, pages 629 and
630 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California,
described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly
corner of said lot; thence Easterly along the Northerly
line of said lot and parallel with Sycamore Street 8-1/2
rods; thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said lot,
21-1/2 feet; thence Westerly and parallel with said Syca-
more Street 8-1/2 rods to the Westerly line of said lot;
thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said lot
21-1/2 feet to the point of beginning.
That part of Original Building Lot 6, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
shown on a map of Anaheim, recorded in Book 4, pages 629
and 630 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, Cali-
fornia, described as follows: Beginning at a point in
the westerly line of said lot 21-1/2 feet South of the
Northwest corner of said lot, thence Southerly along
said Westerly line 50 feet, thence Easterly and parallel
with Sycamore Street 3-1/2 rods to the Easterly line of
said lot, thence Northerly along said Easterly line 50
feet to a point 21-1/2 feet Southerly of the Northeasterly
corner of said lot;. thence Westerly 0-1/2 rods to the
point of beginning.
That portion of Original Building Lot 8, in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
shown on a map of Anaheim, recorded in Book 4, pages 629
and 630 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, Califor-
nia, described as follows; Coramencing on the Easterly
line of Lemon Street at a point 60 feet from the North-
east corner of Lemon and. Adele Streets, running thence
Northerly along the line of Lemon Street 50 feet, thence
Easterly 140 feet; thence Southerly 50 feet, thence
Westerly 140 feet to beginning.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dill hold a
public hearing at the City all in the City of Anaheim on
Zarch 27, 1967, notice of which said public hearing was duly
given as required by law and the provisions. of Title 12, Chapter
10.76 of the Anaheim 1junicipal Code; and
WHEET,AS, said City Plannind Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did aCopt Resolution No. PC67-31,
denying, by operation of law, Variance NO. 1361, and
rELaEAs, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) CLayzi from
the date of the adoption of sai resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protest-
ing the action of the City Planning Commission denying said
variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on June 13,
1967, at 7:00 o'clock P.N. at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 10.76
of the na1ei Nunicipai Code; anC
=E-;S, after Cue investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City
Council does find and determine that.
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the present
zone.
row, THEREFORE, 'n r. IT RESOLVED 1
,Ov��, ���_,�:;s:£'01�,, �1, I� :�',SO.�L:r�� by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning
Commission denying, by operation of law, Variance No. 1061,
be, and the same is hereby sustained; and that the petition of
Lotus H. and Victoria I. Loudon, and Alvin R. and Eva Y. Faker
for a zoning variance permitting the establishm=ent of a 17---
story high-rise apartment building for senior citizens, with
waivers of the following Anaheim _Iunicipal Code requirements
and limitations:
(a) :ii.inimum parking spaces (Section 13.28.050(10-a. c))
(b) JLinimum building site area per dwelling unit
(Section 13.32.050(2)),
(c) Ninimum floor area per dwelling unit
(Section 18.28.050(3-a));
(d) building height (Section 18.28.050(5-a)),
and
(e) r "inimum recreational floor area
Section 18.32.050 (4. -a))
on the property hereinbefore described, be, and the same is
hereby denied.
THE FO2EGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 13th day of June, 1967.
ATTEST:
CIi CLERX OF THE CITY OF A"iv''All _I
MAYO j± TL .E Y
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 67R -322 was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 13th day of June,
1967, by the following vote of the members thereof:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Krein, Schutte and Pebley
NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 67R -322 on the 13th
day of June, 1967.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 13th day of
June 1967.
C OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ITY LERK
CITY CLERK
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution
No. 67R -322 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
June 13th, 1967.