1967-256RESOLUTION NO. 67R -256
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1862.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
HUMBLE OIL COMPANY, owner of certain real property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
That portion of Lot 28 of Anaheim Extension as shown on
a Map by Wm. Hamel, a copy of which is shown in Book 3,
pages 162 to 164 inclusive of Los Angeles County Maps in
the office of the County Recorder of Orange County,
California, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly prolongation
of the North line of Ball Road with the intersection of the
center line of Harbor Boulevard, as described in deed to the
County of Orange, recorded March 28, 1930 in Book 372, page
67 of Official Records; thence North 89° 46' 30 East along
said Westerly prolongation of said North line of Ball Road,
a distance of 30 feet, more or less, to the East line of
said Harbor Boulevard; thence continuing along said North
line of Ball Road, 150 feet; thence North, at right angles
to said North line of Ball Road, to the North line of the
land described in deed to Edwin Emil Kettler and wife, re-
corded December 17, 1951 in Book 2264, page 590 of Official
Records; thence South 89° 46' 30" West along said North line
to said center line of Harbor Boulevard; thence South 11°
07' 30' West along said center line 158.48 feet to the point
of beginning.
Excepting any interest in the Southerly 20 feet thereof
conveyed to the City of Anaheim by need dated December 3,
1953 and recorded December 11, 1953 in Book 2632, page 187
of Official Records.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on March
27, 1967, notice of which said public hearing was duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. PC67 -63, deny-
ing Variance No. 1862; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty -two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denying said variance,
and said appeal was set for public hearing on May 9, 1967, at
700 o'clock P.M. at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, and
notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law
and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code; and
-1-
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that
1. There is no substantial property right possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the present
zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commis-
sion denying Variance No. 1862 be, and the same is hereby sus-
tained, and that the petition of Humble Oil Company for a zoning
variance permitting waivers of the following Anaheim Municipal
Code re- quirements or limitations:
(1) The maximum number of Free- Standing Signs
(Section 18.62.090- E(1));
(2) Maximum height of a Free- Standing Sign
(Section 18.62.090- B(2));
(3) Maximum area of a Free- Standing Sign
(Section 18.62.090- B(4)); and
(4) Location of a Free Standing Sign in relation to the
property line of an abutting parcel of property
(Section 18.62.090- B(5)),
on the property hereinbefore described, be, and the sane is
hereby denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 9th day of iay, 1967.
ATTEST:
CIT
CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACTING MAYOR PRO TEM OF THCITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 67R -256 was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 9th day of May,
1967, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCILMEN:
NOES: COUNCILMEN:
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the acting Mayor Pro Tem of
the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 67R -256
on the 9th day of May, 1967.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of
May, 1967.
(SEAL)
Dutton, Chandler, and Krein
None
Pebiey
Schutte
CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ,ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution
No. 67R -256 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
May 9, 1967.
City Clerk