1985-261RESOLUTION NO. 85R-261
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2660.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit
from C C & F LA PALMA INVESTMENT COMPANY, owner, to permit an
industrially-related two-story office complex upon certain real
property located within the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, legally described as:
PARCEL 2: THE SOUTH 61.34 FEET OF THAT PART LYING
WEST OF THE EAST 764.79 FEET OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 36 OF
THE YORBA LINDA TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 5, PAGES 17 AND 18 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST 25 FEET.
PARCEL 3: LOT 11 IN BLOCK 36 OF THE YORBA LINDA
TRACT, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGES 17
AND 18 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 30 FEET AND THE EAST
39.79 FEET.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A 2/3RDS INTEREST IN AND TO
THE WATER WELL AND PUMPING PLANT LOCATED ON SAID LOT
11, AS DESCRIBED IN AGREEMENTS BETWEEN GEORGE H.
SCHROEDER AND OTHERS RECORDED JUNE 30, 1934 IN BOOK
688, PAGE 37 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND IN BOOK 683,
PAGE 256 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing upon said application at the City Hall in the City of
Anaheim, notices of which public hearing were duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection,
investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and
after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC85-118 denying
Conditional Use Permit No. 2660; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion,
caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a duly
noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City Council did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds, after careful consi-
deration of the recommendations of the City Planning Commission
and all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, that:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by the Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoin-
ing land uses and the growth and development of the area in which
it is proposed to be located.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace,
health, safety and general welfare.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and
improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the
conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that, for the reasons hereinabove stated, the
action of the City Planning Commission denying said conditional
use permit be, and the same is hereby, reversed and that
Conditional Use Permit No. 2660 be, and the same is hereby,
granted permitting an industrially-related two-story office
complex on the hereinabove described real property, subject to
the following conditions:
1. That the owner
offer to dedicate to the
thirty-two feet (32') in
along Richfield Road and
centerline of the street
widening purposes.
of subject property shall irrevocably
City of Anaheim a strip of land
width from the centerline of the street
fifty-three feet (53') in width from the
along La Palma Avenue for street
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of
Anaheim along Richfield Road and La Palma Avenue, including
preparation of improvement plans and installation of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water
facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage
facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and
that security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit,
letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to
the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee
-2-
the satisfactory completion of said improvements. Said security
shall be posted with the City prior to issuance of building
permits, to guarantee the installation of the above-required
improvements prior to occupancy.
~"° 3. That street lighting facilities along Richfield Road and
La Palma Avenue shall be installed as required by the Utilities
General Manager in accordance with specifications on file in the
Office of Utilities General Manager, and that security in the form
of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be
posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of
the above-mentioned improvements. Said security shall be posted
with the City of Anaheim prior to issuance of building permits.
The above-required improvements shall be installed prior to
occupancy.
4. That prior to issuance of a building permit, primary
water main fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim, in an amount
as determined by the Office of the Utilities General Manager.
5. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the
appropriate traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City
of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council for new
industrial buildings and office buildings.
6. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the owner of
subject property shall pay the appropriate drainage assessment fees
to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City
Engineer.
7. That all driveways shall be constructed to accommodate
ten (10) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Traffic
Engineer.
8. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in
a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer.
9. That subject property shall be served by underground
utilities.
10. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire
hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined
to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
11. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained
in accordance with approved plans on file with the Street
Maintenance and Sanitation Division.
12. That fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by
the City Fire Marshall.
13. That all air conditioning facilities and other roof and
ground-mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view.
-3-
14. That the proposal shall comply with all signing
requirements of the ML(SC) Zone, unless a variance allowing sign
waivers is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council.
15. That the proposed office
be limited to the following listed
reviewed and approved by the City
said uses shall be recorded in the
Recorder, a copy of which shall be
Department:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
uses for subject property shall
uses and that a covenant
attorney's Office so limiting
Office of the Orange County
presented to the Planning
Accounting - Bookkeeping, CPA Firms or Temporary
CPA Firms
Advertising
Appraisers
Banks
Brokers - Real Estate, Business Opportunities, etc.
Business System Companies
Communication Consultant
Credit Reporting Agency
Designer - Industrial, Interior, Graphic
Development Companies
Insurance Companies/Agencies
Inventory Services
Leasing Companies
Management Consultants/Companies
Marketing Research
Personnel Agency
Sales Office (outside, as it relates
industrial)
Secretarial Services
Any use permitted under Zoning Code
18.61.020, subject to all conditions
section.
to the
Section
of said
Each individual use shall require the approval of the
Planning Department prior to occupancy which approval shall only be
given when it is demonstrated by the applicant that such use is
either an expressly permitted use in such zone or meets the
criteria of Section 18.61.050.605 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
16. That subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of
Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 10.
17. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized
under this resolution, or prior to issuance of a building permit,
or within a period of one year from the date of this resolution,
whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 15,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further
time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with
Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
-4-
18. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized
under this resolution, or final building and zoning inspections
whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13 and 17,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
19. That prior to commencement of the activity herein
approved or issuance of any occupancy permit for any of the uses
identified in Condition No. 15, preceding, the property owner(s)
shall record the covenant described in Condition 15 above.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the
conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or
any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final
judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed
null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 25th day of June, 1985.
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANA M
ATTEST:
~.___
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JLW:fm
3879M
070585
-5-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) ~'
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 85R-261 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 25th day of June, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 85R-261 on the 25th day of June, 1985.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 25th day of June, 1985.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 85R-261 duly passed and
adopted by the Anaheim City Council on June 25, 1985.
CITY CLERK