1967-489
-
'-
RESOLUTION NO.
67R-489
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARlANC~ NO. 1900 .
,~
,I
WHEREAS, the City Planning ~ommission of the City of
did receive a petition for zo' ing variance from Walter
I c c sse
cer.ta n rea property s tuate in e ty 0 a eim, ounty
Orange, State of California, described as follows:
All that portion of Lot 1 of Tract No. 3313, in the City
of Anahe~, County of Orange, State of California, as per
map recorded in Book 107, pages 3~ through 37, inclusive, .
of Miscellaneous Maps, in the Off~ce of the County Recorder
of said County, lying northerly of a line which is parallel
with, and distant southerly 200.00 feet measured at right
angles, from the most northerly line of said Lot 1.
ALSO all that portion of the land. conveyed to John E.
Kilroy by deed recorded August 20, 1959 in Book 4849,
page 291 of Official Records of said County, (indicated
on map of said Tract No. 3313 as "not a part" and also
shown on a map recorded in Book 35, page 34 of Record of
Surveys, records of said county) lying southerly of the
most northerly line of said Lot 1 produced westerly to its
intersection with the east line of Los Angeles Street
100.00 feet wide.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commdssion did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in th~ City of Anaheim upon said
petition on July 31, 1967 , notice of which said public
hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anahei~ Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning, Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies'made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Re~olution No. PC67-170 iIeri-e&-
i~ , recommending that Variance No. 1900 be denied
; and
.",,-...
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denvin~ said
variance, and said appeal was set for. Qublic hearing on
A~ust 29 , 19 67 , at 11:30 oOc10ck P.M. at the City
Hall n the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing
was duly given as required by law and, the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that:
-1-
,."..
-
.~
1.
There are exceptional or extr~ordinary circum-
stances or conditions applica*le to the property
involved or to the intended u~e of the property
that do not apply generally t~ the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
.,..-..
2. That such a variance is neces~ary for the preser-
vation and enjoyment of a sub~tantial property
right possessed by other prop~rty in the same
vicinity and zone and denied to the property in
question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the 'public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not
adversely affect the compreherlsive general zoning
plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
city of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the same
is hereby granted permitting the erection of two roof signs, with
waivers of the following Anaheim Munici.a1 Code requirements or
l:1aitations:
m
(d)
Number of roof signs permitted;
HiD~ distance between fre,-standing and roof signs;
Permitted roof sign location$; and
Aggregate sign area,
on the property hereinbefore described, subject to the following
condition:
That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and spec~fications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked 'Exhibit No.1. If
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner, his
.eirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim MUnicipal
Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance is
Iranted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code
an1ess otherwise specified herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 29th day of August, 1967.
ArI'EST:
,~
~~ ~..~
..... . ~L--;F .. ' -~OfAiWmIH
-2-
.",.
,~
-
-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CQIIlY OF 0Jl~ )
CITY 0' AlWEII )
SSe
.~
I, DEllE M. WILLIAJI$, City Clerks' f tiae City of Analleill, do
herdy certify that tile foregolag a.solutio Ie. 671..... _I intr" ced
and adopt_ at a replar .ati.. provided la., of tile City Council
of tlte Cl ty of Analleia, beld 011 tIl. 29th da of AlIglIat, 1967, by tile
following yote of the ....rs ther.of:
AYES: COlE I1JEII. KreiD, $chtatt., Chandler, and
Peltley
HCES. CCUJ; IIJlElla NOlle
AIIIDIT . C~I1.IIEII. Dutton
AID I FURDIIR CElllIFY tJaat the =+= of tile City of AnaJula
approved a.d sllDed said aesolution. .0. 67. ... the 29t1l day of
....st, 1967.
the officia~ I:!~:S ~~:' 0: :::e::r=:o~: :, a.:~ A=.:~f=;.
C .:Ix, "2k/..~~
~ ~TIIl~AIWImI
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of th~ City of Anabeim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing is theor~gll'lal of Resolution No.
67R-489 duly passed and adopted by the Anah.i. City Council on August
29, 1967.
~ ')x. ~t"'+.--'
. . City Clerk
~
~
-