1967-456
RESOLUTION NO, 67R-456
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1895
-".--
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from Jane Marie
C enter,and Howard Roseman Friess and Rosemar Elizabeth Fr1ess,owners
o certa~n rea property s~tuated in t e ~ty 0 na e m, ounty
of Orange, State of California, described as follows~
The South 241.00 feet of the North 491.00 feet
of the East 122.40 feet of that portion of
Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10 West,
in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana,
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, shown as Lot 5 on a map filed in
Book 1, page 55 of Record of Surveys, in the Office
of the County Recorder of said County.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said
petition on July 6~ 1967 , notice of which said
public hearing was duly given as required by law and the pro-
visions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim MUnicipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No.PC67-152 , ~~~
~ , recommending that Variance No. 1895 be aranted.
subiect to the conditions therein set forth ; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council
did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by
the City Planning Commission in granti~ said variance and
did set a public hearing thereon to be eld on the 8th day of
A~ust , 19 67 , at 7:00 o~clock P.M. in the City Hall
in t e City of Anaheim and notice of such public hearing was
duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that:
-1-
-
l. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
,..-
2. That such a variance is necessary for the preser-
vation and enjoyment of a substantial property
right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone and denied to the property in
question.
3. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not
adversely affect the comprehensive general zoning
plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
city of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the same
is hereby granted permitting the division of the hereinbefore
described property, which now consists of two lots, into four lots,
with waivers of the minimum lot width and minimum area require-
ments of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Section 18.24.030(4-a)),
subject to the following conditions:
1.
That this variance is granted subject to the
completion of Reclassification Proceedings No.
67-68-4 now pending.
That sidewalks shall be installed along Cherry Way, as
required by the City Engineer and in accordance with
standard plans and specifications on file in the Office
of the City Engineer, prior to final building inspection.
That the owners of subject ~roperty shall pay to the
City of Anaheim the sum of ~25.00 per dwelling unit,
to be used for park and recreation purposes, said
amount to be paid at the time the building permit
is issued.
2.
3.
That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit No.1."
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owners,
their heirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim
Municipal Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said
variance is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal
Code unless otherwise specified herein.
4.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 8th day of August, 1967.
~.
,
ATTEST:
~crJtrOF ~'6nRAIlInM
-2-
-
-
lum Of CALIPQDIIA )
C*'Y OF ~E )
Cln OF AIWEDI )
f:::)rL:T
.1
ss.
, :) fi fl :.~! ::::
()'i/ (~i
r::, CLJ
I, DElE M. WILLIAIIS, Cl ty Clerk ~f the City of Al'laheia,
do Iter.by certify tat tM for..-1ag Re,olujtlDll 110. 671-46 .8
inUod\tced and acl.,tecl at I relJu11r ..eting! prerided by law, of
til. Cl ty Couacll of tM CIty of ....Ileia, "'~d Oft the 8th day of
.....st, 1967, it, the fellowiag, yet. of tile .....rs tIl.re.fa
AYiSa Cw.: ILMD a Dutton, lr.iA, Scautte, Cllandler
aAd P.bley
NOESa Ca.;~a NOlle
AlSDTa CaDI:;~a NOAe
~ I 'PIITMII CllTIfY that tJae ~yor of the City of AnaJleia
approved aAd sit... said Reso111ti.R No. 67R~e6 Oft tile 8th day of
AulUst, 1967.
II WI"lWSS 1IIiUOf, I have laere..-to set ay band lad af fixe.
the official ..al of the City Of Anaheia, ~ls 8th day of .....st, 1967.
~~~i,~
( SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the Clty of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution
No. 67R-456 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on
August 8, 1967.
~~.~---
City Clerk
~
..-......
-~
-