1981-119RESOLUTION NO. 81R-119
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3192.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by CONRAD J. LETTER
and JOSEPHINE M. LETTER, owners, and WALTER K. BOWMAN, agent, was
received, a public hearing before the Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper notice, a result of
which Variance No. 3192 was denied covering the following described
property:
That portion of Lot 1 of the Anaheim extension as shown
on a map of Survey made by William Hamel and filed for
recording in the office of the County Recorder of Los
Angeles County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the North line of said lot
being in the South line of La Palma Avenue, distant
thereon 255.33 feet West of the Northeast corner of
said lot running thence West along the North line of
said Lot 79.91 feet, thence South parallel with the
Easterly line of said Lot 302.23 feet thence North 73°
54' 25" East 77 feet to a line which is parallel with
the Easterly line of said lot thru a point of beginning.
Thence Northerly along said lot mentioned parallel line
279.849 feet to the point of beginning. Said land is
shown on a licensed Surveyors Map _filed in Book 16,
Page 9 of Records of survey in the office of the County
Recorder of said County; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing,
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof, the
City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. That there are no special circumstances applicable to the
property which do not apply to other property in the same vicinity
and zone.
2. That strict application of the zoning code does not de-
prive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
same vicinity and zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
.w. the City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that notice is hereby given to the
applicant that the time within which judicial review of the afore-
said decision must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
-1-
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of March, 1981.
ATTEST:
CIT CLERK OF TH CITY OF ANAHEIM
JLW : fm
-2-
.'"'""
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 81R-119 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 17th day of March, 1981, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 81R-119 on the 17th day of March, 1981.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 17th day of March, 1981.
L.At~.-~~/,~.
CITY C ERK OF THE CI OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 81R-119 duly passed and adopted
by ttze Anaheim City Council on March 17, 1981.
CITY CLERK
"~~'.~*,