91-189 RESOLUTION NO. 91R-189
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1991/92.
WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1977,
added Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various
limitations on the appropriations of the state and local
governments; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the State Constitution
provides that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1991/92 is
calculated by adjusting the 1990/91 fiscal appropriations limit
for changes in the cost of living and population except as
otherwise provided in said Article XIII B; and
WHEREAS, the information necessary for making these
adjustments is attached in Exhibits A through G; and
WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has complied with all the
provisions of Article XIII B of the State Constitution in
determining the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1991/92.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the appropriations limit for fiscal year
1991/92 be established in the amount of $274,805,434.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and selects that, with regard
to fiscal year 1991/92 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in the cost of living" for
purposes of Section 8(e) (2) of Article XIII B of the Constitution
of the State of California shall mean the percentage change in
the local assessment roll from the preceding year for the City of
Anaheim due to the addition of local nonresidential new
construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and chooses that, with regard
to fiscal year 1991/92 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in population" for purposes of
Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California and
Division 9 of Article 1 of the Government Code of the State of
California shall mean the change in population within the city of
Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit
herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by
resolution of the City Council.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 18th day of
MAYOR,OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST: ~'~-~ '~
JLW: lm
-2-
I:\DOCS\ORDRES\LIMIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 91R-189 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 18th day of
June, 1991, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 91R~189 on the 19th day of June, 1991.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 19th day of June, 1991.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. $OHL, City Clerk of the city of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 91R-189, duly passed and
adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on June 18, 1991.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1991 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1992
EXHIBIT A
1991/92 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
CALCULATIONS AND COMPARISON OF APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT
FY 1990/91 Adopted Appropriations Limit $218,809,283
Adjustment Factor 1.2559
FY 1991/92 Appropriations Limit $274,806,434
FY 1991/92 Appropriations Limit $274,805,434
FY 1991/92 Appropriations Subject To Limit 127,615,750
FY 1991/92 Appropriations Limit Margin $147,189,683
FY 1991/92 Appropriations Limit Margin, As a Percent of Limit 53.6%
EXHIBIT B
1991/92 APPIIOPBIATIONS LIMIT
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
POPULATION - Selected Factor: City Population Growth
Population count provided by the
State Finance Department 273,491 -
Population percent change pursuant
to Sections 2227 and 2228 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code 10.36%
CHANGE IN COST OF LIVING -
Selected Factor: Change Due to the Addition of
Local Nonresidential New Construction
A) Dolla~ Change in Local Non-Residential New
Construction Valuation 115,505,364
B) Dollar Change in Total Assessed Valuation 836,770,899
Percent Change ((A/B) X 100) 13.80%
POPULATION AND PRICE FACTOR
CONVERTED TO AN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
A) Population - City, Converted to a factor 1.1036
B) Cost of Living - Non-Residential New Const.,
Converted to a factor 1.1380
Ratio of change: A X B = 1.2559
GANCTY92/BUD DOG
EXHIBIT C
1991/92 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT CALCULATION
~" Totals
Total All Revenues $592,451,600
Reduce by Non-Proceeds of Taxes 454,717,967 $137,733,633
Add User Fees in Excess of Costs 0 137,733,633
Add User Fees in Replacement of Taxes 3,013,210 140,746,843
Subtract Revenues Supporting
Federal Mandates (FLSA) 370,695 140,376,148
Subtract Gas Tax 2105 Revenues 938,500 139,437,648
Subtract Qualified Capital Projects 11,056,750 128,380,898
Subtract Debt Service Appropriations 765,148 $127,615,750
Total All Appropriations $592,451,600
Reduce by Non-Proceeds of Taxes 454,717,967 $137,733,633
Subtract Debt Service Appropriations 765,148 136,968,485
Subtract Revenues Supporting
Federal Mandates (FLSA) 370,695 136,597,790
Subtract Gas Tax 2105 Revenues 938,500 135,659,290
Subtract Qualified Capital Projects 11,056,750 124,602,540
Add User Fees in Excess of Costs 0 124,602,540
Add Appropriations for Functions
Formerly Tax Supported 3,013,210
'ppropriations Subject to Limit $127,615,750
GANCTY92/BUD DOC
EXHIBIT D
1991/92 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
PROCEEDS OF TAXES CALCULATION
PROCEEDS NON-PROCEEDS
OF TAXES OF TAXES TOTAL
Taxes $103,146,368 $103,146,358
State Subventions 22,367,375 22,367,375
Service Charges 1,360,900 36,432,897 37,793,797
Permit Fees 7,317,809 7,317,809
~'Fines and Forfeitures 3,063,634 3,063,634
Rentals 39,562,743 39,562,743
Sales 9,559,000 242,014,173 ,251,573,173
Refunds and Reimbursements 13,467,704 13,467,704
Internal Service Charges 81,866,226 81,866,226
Federal and County Subventions 6,147,473 6,147,473
Contributions 8,846,408 8,846,408
Subtotal $136,433,633 $438,719,067 $575,152,700
Interest 1,300,000 15,998,900 17,298,900
Total All City Revenues $137,733,633 $454,717,967 $592,451,600
Use of (Contribution to) Fund Balances 27,403,234
Mello-Roos CFDs (Seperate Limits) 9,877,635
Redevelopment Agency 59,689,704
Housing Authority 19,478,834
~.~rand Total 708,901,007
I0,00~
1,l¢1,100
406,000
211,351
$,152,045
~0,000
20~43e
$30,000
1,~0,05~
38,500
3,000
26,501
10,OOO
0
0
105,000
1,159,27~
11,11l,$85
30,000
3,OO§
f,OO0
~OZ,~ZO
4,61~,836
0
iO,SO0
$0,000
SO0,000
150,OOO
TEXT OF GANN SPENDIN(I-IAMITATION INITIATIVE EX~TB'I'T F
LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS, INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAl,
AMENDMENT. Establishes and define.'; annual appropriation limits on state and local
governmental entities based on annual appropriations for prior fiscal year. Requires
adjustments for changes in cost of living, population and other specified factors.
Appropriation limits may be established or temporarily changed by electorate. Requires
revenues received in excess of appropriations permitted by this measure to be returned by
revision of tax rates or fee schedules within two fiscal years next following year excess
created. With exceptions, provides for reimbursement of local governments for new
programs or higher level of services mandated by state. Financial Impact:
lndeterminable.
ARTICLE XIII B.
Sec. I. The total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and of each
local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government
for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as
otherwise provided in this Article.
Sec. 2. Revenues received by any entity of government in excess of that amount
which is appropriated by such entity in compliance with this Article during the fiscal year
shall be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the next two
subsequent fiscal years.
Sec. 3. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year pursuant to See. 1 shall be
adjusted as follows:
(a) In the event that the financial responsibility of providing services is
transferred, in whole or in part, whether by annexation, incorporation or otherwise, from
one entity of government to another, then for the year in which such transfer becomes
effective the appropriations limit of the transferee entity shall be increased by such
reasonable amount as the said entities shall mutually agree and the appropriations libnit of
the transferor entity shall be decreased by the same amount.
(b) in the event that the financial responsibility of providing services }s
transferred, in whole or in part, from an entity of government to a private entity, or the
financial source for the provision of services }s transferred, in whole or in part, from other
revent,es of an entity of government, to regulatory licenses, user charges or user fees,
then for the year of such transfer the appropriations limit of such entity of government
shall be decreased accordingly.
(c) In ti{e event of an emergency, the appropriation limit may be exceeded
provided that the appropriation limits in the following three years are reduced accordingly
to prevent an aggregate increase in appropriations resulting from the emergency.
Sec. 4. The appropriations limit imposed on any new or existing entity of
government by this Article may be established or changed by the electors of such entity,
subject to nod in conformity with constitutional and sta.tutory voting requirements. The
duration of any such change shall be as determined by said electors, but shall in no event
exceed four years from the most recent vote of said electors creating or continuing such
change.
1of 3
EXHIBIT F
Sec. 5. Each entity of goverNmer,~ may esta~)lish such eontingen¢!y, ~merk~ency,
unemployment, re~erv~. retirement, 5inklug fired, trust. or minibit funds us il shah deem
reasonable and proper. Contribatior, s %o ~)y such fiJ~, to, 1he extent th~,t surh
contributions are derived from :he proceeds Of ~axes, shall for purposes of this Art)ele
constitute appropriations ~ubjeet to limitali(,), i), 1hc year o~ contribution. Neither
withdrawals from soy such fund, nor expenditares ()t (or autl)orizations to c~pend) :;uch
w~thdruwals, nor trundlers between or among such fun(is, shall for purposes of this Artie)e
e()nstilute appropriations subject to hmitation.
See. 6. Whenever the Legislature or any sta(e agency mandates a new program or
higher level of service on an~' local government, the state shall provide a subvention of
/tinds to reimburse sueb local government for the eosts of such program or increased level
of serv~;~e, except that the Legislature ~ney, bui need not, provide such subvention of
fun~ for the following mandate~;:
(a) Legislative mandates requested by the local agency affected;
(b) 'L~gislation defining a new crime or changing an existing definition of a
crime; or
(e) Legislative mandates enacted Drier to January 1, 1975, or exeeutivc orders
or regulations initially implementing legislation enacted prior to January 1, 1975.
See. 7. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to impair the ablility of the state
or of any local government to meet its obligations with respect to existing or future
bonded indebtedness.
See. 8. As ,sed in this Article and except us otherwise expressly provided herein:
(a) "Appropriations subject to hm~tation" of the state shall mean any
autl~orization to ex~nd during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for the
state, exclusive of state subventions for the use and operation of local government (other
than subventions made persunni Io Section 6 of this Article) and further exclusive of
refunds of taxes, benefit payments from retirement, unemployment insurance and
disability insurance funds;
(b) "Appropriations subject to limitation" of an entity of local government
shall mean any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by
or for that entity and the proceeds of state subventions to that entity (other than
subventions made pursuant to Section 6 of this Article) exclusive of refunds of taxes;
(e) "Proceeds of taxes" shall include, but not be restricted to, all tax revenues
and the proceeds to an entity of government, from (i) regulatory licenses, user charges,
and user fees to the extent that such proceeds exeeed the costs reasonably borne by such
entity in providing the regulation, product, or service, and (ii) the investment of tax
revenues. With respect to any local government, "proceeds of taxes" shall include
~ubventions received from the state, other than pursetoni to Section 6 of this Attic)e, and,
with respect to the state, proceeds of taxes shall exclude such subventions;
fd) "Local gow~rnment" shall mean soy eity,.eounty, city and county, sel~ool
district, specml district, autl~ority, or other political subdivision of or withiu the state;
((:) "Cost o1' living" ~:ball mean the Consumer Price Index for tbc United States
aS reported by the Unilc~l States I)epartment of Laboc, or sueeessor ageacy of the baited
~tates Govern~ent; provided, bowever, Ihat for purposes of Section 1, the eh~mge irm cost
of living from the peeeeding yenr sh~ll in no event exceed the change in Cnlifornin per
capita personal income from said preceding ye~r;
2of 3
EXHIBIT P
(f) "Population" of any entity of goverulncnt, other lhun u school district, allall
be determined by a method prescribed by the Lt!gi.',h~turu, provided that such
determination shall be revised, ils necessary, to reflect the [)triodie census (.undueted by
the United States I)epartment of Com~neree, or suce~.ssor ~cncy of the United States
(;overnmeni. The population of any school dislriet shall I)e sl~ch school district's average
daily attendance as determined by a {nethod prescribed by the l.egisluture;
(g) "Debt service" allall mean appropriations required to pay tile cost of
interest and redemption charges, including the funding of any reserve or sinking fund
required in connection therewith, on indebtedness existing or legally authorized as of
January 1, 1979 or on bonded indebtedness thereafter approved according to law by a vote
of the electors of the issuing entity voting in an election for such purpose.
(h) The "appropriations limit" of each entity of government for each fiscal
year shall be that amount which total annual appropriations subject to limitation may not
exceed under'~eetion 1 and Section 3; provided, however, that the "appropriations limit"
of each entity of government for fiscal year 1978-79 shall be the total of the
appropriations subject to limitation of such entity for that fiscal year. For fiscal year
1978-79, state subventions to local governments, exclusive of federal grants, shall be
deemed to have been derived from the proceeds of state taxes.
(i) Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, "appropriations subject to
limitation" shall not include local agency loan funds or indebtedness funds, investment (or
authorizations to invest) funds of the state, or of an entity of local government in
aceousts at banks or savings and loan associations or in liquid securities.
See. 9. "Appropriations subject to limitation" for each entity of government shall
not include:
(a) Debt service.
(b) Appropriations required for purposes of complying with mandates of the
courts or the federal government which, without discretion, require an expenditure for
additio,ml services or which unavoidably make the providing of existing services more
costly.
(e) Appropriations of any special district which existed on January 1, 1978,
and which did not as of tile 1977-78 fiscal year levy an ad valorem tax on property in
excess of ]2~ cents per $100 of assessed value; or the appropriations of any special
district then existing or thereafter created by a vote of the people, which is totally funded
by other than the proceeds of taxes.
Sec. 10. This Article Mlall be effective commencing with the first day of the fiscal
year following its adoption.
Sec. II. If any appropriation category shall be added to or relnoved from
appropriations subject to lilnit,,tion, pnrsuant to final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction and uny appeal therefrom, tile approp'riations limit shall be adjusted
accordingly. If any section, part, clause or phrase in this Article is for any reason held
invalid or tanconstitutional, tile remaining portions of this Article shall not be affected but
shall remain in full force and effect.
3of 3
EXHIBIT G
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON, Goyemor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE .~
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 9~14,.49cJ8
May 14, 1991
POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIHATES
The enclosed Summary Reports (E-5 PRELIM) provide estimates of population and
housing data for the cities, the unincorporated area, and the total county as
of January 1, 1990 and 1991. The 1990 census is the benchmark for the estimates
of housing and population. A copy of the April 1, 1990 census data is also
enclosed.
The following information for your city/county has been sent to your fiscal
officer:
1. The percent change in population minus exclusions from January 1,
1990 to January 1, 1991, and other information required to calculate
the Article XIIIB appropriation limit for fiscal year I991-1992.
2. The January 1, 1991 total population estimate and information
concerning certification.
If you have any questions regarding these population and housing estimates,
please telephone the Demographic Research Unit at {916} 322-4651.
Estimates Staff
Demographic Research Unit
915 L Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-3701
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEEXHIBIT G DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 34 JANUARY ~, ]990 O5/O3/91
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS~ ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
~ANAHEIM 264641 260503 4138 92522 87]88 5.77 2.988
BREA 32944 32831 113 12652 12238 3.27 2.683
BUENA PARK 68398 67989 409 23154 22097 4.57 3.077
COSTA MESA 95528 93278 2250 39392 37167 5.65 2.510
CYPRESS 42694 42557 137 14705 14272 2.94 2.982
DANA POINT 31368 31017 351 ]4554 12488 14.20 2.484
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 53827 53517 310 18013 17416 3.31 3.O73
FULLERTON 113861 ]11894 ]967 42880 40796 4.86 2.743
GARDEN GROVE 142141 1401OO 2041 45747 44323 3.11 3.]61
HUNTINGTON BEACH 181346 180612 734 72621 68733 5.35 2.628
IRVINE 109815 107633 2182 42]53 40031 5.03 2.689
LAGUNA BEACH 23172 23021 151 12833 11086 13.61 2.077
LAGUNA NIOUEL 43016 42996 20 18277 16622 9.06 2.587
LA HABRA 50959 50660 299 18637 18017 3.33 2.812
LA PALMA 15387 15385 2 4930 4808 2.47 3.200
LOS ALAMITOS 11549 11308 241 4284 4123 3.76 2.743
MISSION VIEJO 72089 71860 229 26084 24858 4.70 2.891
NEWPORT BEACH 66626 65930 696 34763 30829 11.32 2.]39
ORANGE 110165 106168 3997 37849 36625 3.23 2.899
PLACENTIA 41319 41051 268 ]3730 13368 2.64. 3.O71
SAN CLEMENTE 40766 40675 91 18605 16584 10.86 2.453
~.$AN JUAN CAPISTRANO 25927 25772 ]55 9551 8937 6.43 2.884
SANTA ANA 292077 28~564 7513 74972 71568 4.54 3.976
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE EXHIBIT G DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 35 JANUARY 1, 1990 O5/O3/91
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS~ ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
~'SEAL BEACH 25110 2~8h7 263 1~O7 13369 7.20 1.859
STANTON 30339 29906 433 107~O 10267 ~.40 2.913
TUSTIN 50621 ~8665 )956 ~9276 ]8311 5.O] 2.658
VILLA PARK 6288 6286 2 1967 1895 3.66 3.317
WESTMINSTER 78005 7763O 375 25834 25059 3.DO 3.O98
YORBA LINDA 51883 51819 64 17176 16583 3.45 3.125
TOTAL INCORPORATED 2171861 21~O~7~ 31387 782308 739658 5.45 2.894
UNINCORPORATED 226527 220891 5636 88~O9 83711 5.53 2.639
COUNTY TOTAL 2398388 2361365 37023 870917 823369 5.46 2.868
* HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE FROM THE 1990 CENSUS HAVE NOT BEEN RELEASED.
WE EXPECT THEM TO BE AVAILABLE FOR THE 1992 E-5 REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE EXHIBIT G
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNit
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 34 APRIL l, 199o o5/o3/91
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS~ ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
m~m.,,~NAHEIM 266406 262222 4184 93177 87588 6.o0 2.994
BREA 32873 32760 113 12648 12224 3.35 2.680
BUENA PARK 68784 68374 410 23200 22210 4.27 3.079
COSTA MESA 96357 94050 2307 396li 37467 5.41 2.510
CYPRESS 42655 42520 135 14715 14279 2.96 2.978
DANA POFNT 31896 31545 351 14666 12701 13.40 2.484
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 53691 53381 310 18019 17407 3.40 3.067
FULLERTON 114144 112183 1961 42956 40872 4.85 2.745
........ ~I)miI ........... ~(~ ....... ~ .... ~))))mm ..... ~ .............. ~ .........
GARDEN GROVE 143050 141OO4 2046 45984 44538 3.14 3.166
HUNTINGTON BEACH 181519 18O757 762 72736 68879 5.30 2.624
IRVINE 110330 108156 2174 42221 40257 4.65 2.687
LAGUNA BEACH 23170 23019 151 12846 11087 13.69 2.076
........ II)~(~(~IIII .... I~II(ll~ .... II)I(I(II ............... I~)))I ...... II~I ..........
LAGUNA NIGUEL 44400 44380 20 18892 17172 9.10 2.584
LA HABRA 51266 50967 299 18670 18112_ 2.99 2.814
LA PALMA 15392 15390 2 4935 4815 2.43 3.196
........ I)IlIIIlll(lIIIII;IiIIIII() ........... llI)~l~ ........ IiI~ ........ Iill ..........
LOS ALAMITOS 11676 11276 400 4279 4113 3.88 2.742
MISSION VIEJO 72820 72591 229 26393 25174 4.62 2.884
NEWPORT BEACH 66643 65941 702 34861 30860 11.48 2.137
ORANGE 110658 106691 3967 38018 36791 3.23 2.900
PLACENTIA 41259 4099l 268 13733 13369 2.65~ 3.066
SAN CLEMENTE 41100 41009 91 18726 16701 10.81 2.455
~AN JUAN CAPISTRANO 26183 26027 156 9612 9015 6.21 2.887
SANTA ANA 293742 286229 7513 74973 71611 4.48 3.997
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE EXHIBIT G DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 35 APRIL l, 1990 O$/O3/9I
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS~ ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
~,SEAL BEACH 25098 24836 262 14407 13370 7.20 1.858
STANTON 30491 30058 433 10755 10306 4.17 2.917
TUSTIN 50689 48813 1876 19300 18332 5.02 2.663
VILLA PARK 6299 6297 2 1966 1907 3.00 3.302
WESTMINSTER 78118 77745 373 25852 25077 3.00 3.100
YORBA LINDA 52422 52358 64 17341 16774 3.27 3.121
TOTAL INCORPORATED 2183131 2151570 31561 785492 743008 5.41 2.896
UNINCORPORATED 227425 221807 5618 89~80 84058 6.16 2.639
COUNTY TOTAL 2410556 2373377 37179 875072 827066 5.49 2.870
* HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE FROM THE 1990 CENSUS HAVE NOT BEEN RELEASED.
WE EXPECT THEM TO BE AVAILABLE FOR THE 1992 E-5 REPORT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE EXHIBIT G DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 34 JANUARY 1, 199! o5/o3/91
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS~ ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD Q, UARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
ANAHEIM 273491 269171 4320 94705 88898 6.13 3.028
BREA 32950 32841 109 12784 12244 4.22 2.682
BUENA PARK 69804 69390 414 23396 22397 4.27 3.098
COSTA MESA 97437 95002 2435 39790 37631 5.43 2.525
CYPRESS 42628 22525 103 14743 1429I 3.07 2.976
DANA POINT 32760 32410 350 14888 13009 12.62 2.491
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 53699 53388 311 18035 17447 3.26 3.O60
FULLERTON 115563 113619 1944 43308 41097 5.11 2.76~
GARDEN GROVE 145016 142956 2060 46076 44707 2.97 3.198
HUNTINGTON BEACH 182783 181939 844 732~8 69336 5.30 2.624
IRVINE 111418 108697 2721 42464 40373 4.92 2.692
LAGUNA BEACH 23448 23296 152 12879 11170 13.27 2.O86
LAGUNA NIGUEL 47699 47679 20 20248 18417 9.04 2.589
LA HABRA 51617 51315 302 18673 18120 2.96 2.832
LA PALMA 15437 15435 2 4953 4824 2.60 3.200
LOS ALAMITOS 11643 11326 317 4295 4122 4.03 2.748
MISSION VIEJO 73724 73495 229 26775 25571 4.50 2.874
NEWPORT BEACH 67268 66547 721 35275 31114 11.80 2.139
ORANGE 112709 108832 3877 38704 37305 3.61 2.917
PLACENTIA 41375 41107 268 13798 13403 2.86. 3.067
SAN CLEMENTE 42164 42073 91 19055 16990 10.84 2.476
~$AN JUAN CAPISTRANO 26745 26585 160 9749 9125 6.40 2.913
SANTA ANA 300256 292743 7513 75027 71739 4.38 4.O81
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE cAn~xl ~
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH UNIT
REPORT E-5 PRELIM ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION AND HOUSING ESTIMATES PRINTED
PAGE 35 JANUARY 1. 1991 O5/O3/91
CONTROLLED ....... POPULATION ............ HOUSING UNITS* ..... PERSON
PER
HOUSE- GROUP PERCENT HOUSE-
CITY TOTAL HOLD QUARTER TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT HOLD
~SEAL BEACH 25095 24877 218 14403 1336~ 7.21 1.861
STANTON 30818 30385 433 10775 10323 4.19 2.943
TUST1N 52145 50357 1788 19639 18704 4.76 2.692
VILLA PARK 6279 6277 2 1980 1917 3.18 3.27~
WESTMINSTER 78803 78438 365 25917 25114 3.1o 3.123
YORBA LINDA 53878 53814 64 17767 17219 3.08 3.125
TOTAL INCORPORATED 2218652 2186519 32133 793319 749971 5.46 2.915
UNINCORPORATED 234625 229394 5231 92~10 86658 6.43 2.647
COUNTY TOTAL 2~53277 2415913 37364 885929 836629 5.56 2.888
* HOUSING UNITS BY TYPE FROM THE 1990 CENSUS HAVE NOT BEEN RELEASED.
WE EXPECT THEM TO BE AVAILABLE FOR THE 1992 E-5 REPORT