91-326 RESOLUTION NO. 91R-326
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2963 AS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO.
88R-14, AS AMENDED.
WHEREAS, the city Council of the City of Anaheim
heretofore adopted Resolution No. 88R-14 approving Conditional Use
Permit No. 2963, subject to certain conditions specified therein;
and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval of said Conditional
Use Permit No. 2963 have heretofore been amended by Resolution No.
89R-468 and further amended by Resolution No. 90R-451; and
WHEREAS, the permittee has now requested a further
amendment to certain of said conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the city Council held a duly noticed public
hearing on December 3, 1991, at which hearing the city Council did
receive and consider evidence, both oral and documentary, relating
to said request; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines
that the amendment of said conditions of approval is not reasonably
necessary to protect the public peace, health, safety or general
welfare, or necessary to permit reasonable operation under said
Conditional Use Permit No. 2963 for the following reasons:
1. Said Condittional Use Permit No. 2963 was granted
for a limited period of time (or term) which
original term was subsequently twice extended
permitting a total of four years of operation for
said use; and
2. Any further amendment to the conditions of approval
to authorize an additional extension of the term of
such use is not in the public interest and is
contrary to the public health, refer and general
welfare since such premises have been the subject of
recent criminal activity related, in whole or part,
to the sale and consumtion of alcoholic beverages on
the premises.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that the conditions of approval heretofore imposed
in Conditional Use Permit No. 2963 as approved by Resolution No.
88R-14, as amended by Resolutions No. 89R-468 and 90R-451, be, and
the same is hereby, denied for the reasons hereinabove set forth.
CUP #2963
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said petition to amend said
conditions of approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2963 be, and
the same is hereby, denied for the reasons hereinabove set forth.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 3~4 day of December, 1991.
JLW:dnl
R34C2963.12
120991
- 2 -
CUP #2963
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 91R-326 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 3rd day of
December, 1991, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Pickler, Daly and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 91R-326 on the 4th day of December, 1991.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 4th day of December, 1991.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 91R-326 duly passed and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on December 3, 1991.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM